19950122 Ver 1_Complete File_19960508

r State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
May 8, 1996
Memorandum
A4.17
AW=%ft000=%ftW0Pft )A
I D EHNR
To: Mike Bell
USACOE
From: Eric Galamb
Subject: Com=ments on the Mitigation Plan for the Casey Tract
Currituck County
The NC DOT will be impacting approxin..=_ely 2.36 acres of
coastal marsh wetlands with the widening o= NC 168 (=_-2228). A
draft mitiga=ion plan for the Casey Tract ;cas develoed to offset
the coastal -.arch impact. The Division c- .Dnvironme--a1
Management (DEM) has reviewed the April 2, -996 fina- mitigation
plan and offers the following comments:.
1) The first line on page ii of the Exec-:.-ive Summary is not a
complete sentence. How would the enca,ation of The PC field
significantly reduce infiltration losses (page --)?
2) The existing marsh has been invaded by PhragmiteS. This
species is not desirable since it colcnizes dis=urbed areas.
The lane disturbing activities may al-ow Phragm_tes to take
over the sawgrass plantings. An erad-cation plan should be
developed for the.preservation area i- addition to the
proposed creation site.
3) DOT is asing water table elevations from ground;6,ater
observa-ion wells that did not have a cement/be-tonite seal.
The ben-onite seal used had the consi-z-ency of ;".et
newspaper. The reason for using the -entonite seal was to
reduce cracking from a freeze/thaw. -he wells ,-,ere
installed in May. The probability of a freeze -n May is
extremely low. z marsh system will __rmally ha,.e a water
table near the surface with extended -eriods of inundation.
DOT is basing the elevation on the -_Reference Ecosystem
elevation coupled with the water table data col-'ected from
the wells in question. DEM is very c=ncerned a-out the data
collected from the wells.
C) A major reason for preparing a mitiga-ion plan is to
ascertain the quantity of water available to the site.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] f'AX 919-733-2496
An Equo; Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recyced/ 1 0% post-consimer paper

Mike Bell Memo
May 8, 1996
Page 2
The water budget calculated for this project has many
parameters that are not quantified. I-learly this plan does
not present data to show that enough :rater will be available
to create a marsh. Therefore, there is no assurance that
this site will function as proposed.
5) The elevation in the adjacent marsh around elevation 1.0
ft. above msl. The grading plan take:. the elevation to 2.0
ft. above msl. The plan states that -his will be the
highest elevation but the majority c= the elevations on
Figure 10 show 2.0 ft. above msl. Si-ce groundwater
elevations may not be accurate, the --eed to replicate the
existing marsh elevation is even more critical.
6) How can the measured water levels at
reference site be above the ground s
7) The description of the Ballance Far-
shou-.d be included in this document.
mitigation plan probably would not
Casey Tract inspection.
=he Ballance Farm
--face (page 22) ?
reference Ecosystem
The Ballance Farm
taken on-site for a
8) Italics or another method should be ---sed to highlight the
chances in the final plan-
DEM has provided these comments to aEsist DOT in developing
a successf-.7l mitigation plan. Please ca-- Eric Galamb at 733-
1786 if yc--: need clarification on any of =_-ese comments.
casey2.mit
cc: Steve Kroeger
David Robinson, DOT
-John Jorney
FAXED
MAY 0 8 1996
. M , .
*' J
United States Department of the Interior
,
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVIC
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
P11
February 4, 1996 FEB 19 1996
RE DIV r0- MGT
Colonel Robert Sperberg ?C C??VEQ '. R :. a'te`"w' G its
(Attn: Mike Bell, Washington Office)
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ? 1 19
Wilmington Field Office ROh 96
P.O. Box 1890 PC?4Z,9C
?F
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890 Ivc
Re: NC 168 From US 158 at Barco to the VA state line
Currituck County, North Carolina (TIP No. R-2228)
Dear Colonel Sperberg:
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the North Carolina Department of
Transportation's (NCDOT) draft mitigation plans for the above-referenced project.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed the November 14, 1995
revisions to the Casey Tract and Tucker Farm Mitigation Plans and offer the
following recommendations. This report is provided in accordance with provisions
of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 661-667d) and
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act).
This report also serves as comments to state resource agencies in their,
permitting and/or certification processes.
There is some confusion regarding the overall wetland impact acreage for the
entire project. The State Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant
Impact for R-2228 report that 26.5 acres of wetlands would be impacted by this
project. Subsequent documents report varying impact acreage figures. A letter
dated October 6, 1995 from the NCDOT to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
states that the impact acreage is 47.36 acres. Please clarify for the public j
record the wetland impact acreage for the entire project in addition to the J
acreage associated with each segment of the project.
It is our understanding that the widening of NC 168 is being implemented in three
segments and that the proposed mitigation plans were developed as partial
compensatory mitigation for losses associated with two of the segments (TIP Nos.
R-2228BB and R-2228A). We recommend that further permit authorizations be held
in abeyance until compensatory mitigation has been secured for wetland impacts
associated with all three segments of this project.
We have some concern regarding the portions of both mitigation sites that are
located within 150 feet of NC 168. It is unclear whether or not the NC 168
highway depicted in the blue lines portrays pre- or post-widening conditions.
Also, we question the extent of effective drainage of the highway ditches and/or
clearing right of ways on the mitigation area. Due to current or future widening
of NC 168 and/or extent of effective drainage or clearing right of ways it may
be appropriate to exclude the 150-foot zone adjacent to NC 168 from the
mitigation areas.
It is extremely important that permit applicants be able to ensure the protection
of compensatory mitigation sites in perpetuity. Both mitigation plans state that
NCDOT may or may not negotiate with other agencies to determine final management
of the mitigation areas once success is achieved. This degree of uncertainty as
__qw-
to the final dispensation of the mitigation properties is unacceptable to the
Service. The NCDOT must make arrangements to protect the property through
permanent conservation easement held by a third-party grantee such as a land
trust or donate the land to a non-profit entity or resource agency. Deed
restrictions are an inadequate means of protecting mitigation areas of this size.
Arrangements that ensure perpetual protection of these properties should be
clearing outlined in writing and prerequisite to approval of the mitigation plans
by permitting agencies.
The Service has not reviewed these mitigation areas in the field and may have
additional site specific comments at such time. Site visits have been scheduled
for February 6th and/or 7th at which point we can discuss issues further. The
Service has reviewed the November 9, 1995 comments of the N.C. Wildlife Resources
Commission and supports their recommendations. We would like to add and
reiterate a few points.
o After reviewing the photographs of the Tucker Farm site, we also recommend
that the area be preserved at a mitigation ratio of 20:1. The area
appears highly impacted by recent timbering operations and should not
receive the credit of a mature undisturbed stand of forested wetland.
o The success of reforestation at Tucker Farm site would be enhanced if
containerized stock was planted versus bare root stock. Mast-producing
species should be highly represented.
o Only those portions of the prior converted cropland restoration area that
are currently effectively drained should receive a mitigation ratio of
2:1. The remainder should receive enhancement credit at a ratio of 4:1.
o It is unclear what corrective measures would be employed to remove
undesirable or nuisance species from the mitigation areas. No herbicides
should be used within the mitigation areas unless specifically approved by
resource agencies.
o Please clarify whether hydric soils from impacted areas would or would not.
be stockpiled for use within the creation areas at the Casey Tract. Also
more discussion should take place regarding the hydrology associated with
extension of existing ditches through the marsh creation area. We are
concerned about the creation of stagnant water pockets and are unclear
about the proposal, i.e. if and/or how water would circulate through this
area.
o The success criteria for marsh creation at Casey Tract should be based on
at least 75 percent coverage of desired hydrophytic species surviving
after three years.
o We do not object to some credit being applied to the preservation of
mature, forested upland buffers within the mitigation areas.
We acknowledge and appreciate NCDOT's effort to provide in-kind, on-site
replacement of wetland functions and values. Please continue to advise us of the
progress towards resolution of these issues. If our office can supply any
additional information or clarification, please contact Katherine Doak, the
biologist reviewing this project, at (919)-856-4520, ext 19.
Sincerely yours,
Cherry Green
Acting Field Supervisor
CG/KHD/SMZ

CC: NCDEHNR-DEM
NCDEHNR-DCM
NCWRC
NMFS
NCDOT
FHWA
FWS/R4/KDoak/KHD:2-4-96/919-856-4520 ext 19/wp:R2228.MIT
FWS/R4/SZwicker/SMZ:12-11-95/919-856-4520 ext 16/wp:US13NC11.FON

?yy

Ecology and Control
of Reed
Canary Grass
(Phalaris arundinacea L.)
Stephen I. Apfelbaum
Charles E. Sams .
Applied Ecological Services, Inc.
N673 Mill Road
Juda, Wisconsin 53550
•
?G)
11,?
l?
J
ABSTRACT: Reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) is a problem grass in many
natural wetlands. This paper reviews the literature regarding the ecology and manage-
ment of reed canary grass and presents preliminary data that suggests reduced soil-seed
banks occur in wetland substrates containing a dense cover of this species. Chemical
methods usually provide poor long-term control of canary grass, and most effective
canary grass control techniques are not acceptable in natural areas. Because of the lack
of canary grass management information, we have established a field program of
control tests. Appended is a bibliography of the literature.
INTRODUCTION
Reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea
L) has been cultivated for forage (Piper
1924, Wilkins and Hugh 1932) and used
as silage or grass fodder for ruminant
livestock (Aare et al. 1977, Myhr et al.
1978, Hovin et al. 1980). The plant also
has invaded natural wetlands, necessitat-
ing costly control measures. The follow-
ing literature review outlines recent field
research on the ecology and management
of reed canary grass. Much of this infor-
mation has come from agricultural stud-
ies. While the findings may not always
directly relate to natural area steward-
ship, we feel they may provide insight for
persons attempting to control the spread
of this exotic species within protected
areas.
TAXONOMY AND ECOLOGY
Reed canary grass is one of fifteen spe-
cies of the genus Phalaris that is distrib-
uted throughout the world, except in
Antarctica -and Greenland (Anderson
1961). The center of diversity for the
genus is the Mediterranean region. Spe-
cies in this genus occur from wet to dry
habitats, from sea level to high mountain
elevations. Some species dominate the
native vegetation of an area; at least three
species have become undesirable weeds.
Phalaris arundinacea L. is considered
native to North America but is now more
widely represented through introductions
in agricultural areas (Anderson 1961).
Reed canary grass is 'a highly variable
species. Field observations by Balten-
sperger and Kalton (1958) indicate con-
siderable variability in height during an-
thesis, in the size and shape of inflores-
cence, and in overall coloration. These
authors showed that plant height, panicle
size, and shape could not be correlated
with geographic distribution or with each
other, suggesting a high degree of inher-
ent plasticity. Reed canary grass grows
as a perennial from scaly creeping rhi-
zomes, with culms usually from 0.5 m to
2.0 in in height and panicles varying from
7 cm to 40 cm in length (Baltensperger
and Kalton 1958).
Reed canary grass forms dense, highly
productive monocultures that spread ra-
dially. In a four-year experiment, the
species produced 30 percent more hay
than all other grasses tested (Wilkins and
Hughs 1932). Where the species invades
into short perennial grasses, such as red
top (Agrostis albs) or creeping red fescue
(Festuca rubra) (species typically
planted along irrigation ditches), it appar-
ently inhibits their growth within three to
five months, eventually eliminating
them. New canary grass plants rees-
tablish quickly from seeds in the soil
when chemical and mechanical control
treatments are used (Comes et al. 1981).
Because of its tenacity and rapid growth,
this species poses a major threat to many
wetland ecosystems. Preliminary data
suggest drastic declines of wetland and
wet prairie species after several years of
canary grass growth (Apfelbaum 1986).
Canary grass grows and spreads quickly,
forming dense monocultures not unlike
cattails (Apfelbaum 1984, Wilcox et al.
1985) and purple loosestrife (Lythrum
salicaria L.). The plant is capable of
producing dense rhizome growth in suit-
able habitat within one growing season.
Volume 7 (2); 1987 Natural Areas Journal 69
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
May 8, 1996
Memorandum
00a; to
ID FE F1
To: Mike Bell
USACOE
From: Eric Galamb,,:'Y-
Subject: Comments on the Mitigation Plan for the Casey Tract
Currituck County
The NC DOT will be impacting approximately 2.36 acres of
coastal marsh wetlands with the widening of NC 168 (R-2228). A
draft mitigation plan for the Casey Tract was developed to offset
the coastal marsh impact. The Division of Environmental
Management (DEM) has reviewed the April 2, 1996 final mitigation
plan and offers the following comments:
1) The first line on page ii of the Executive Summary is not a
complete sentence. How would the excavation of the PC field
significantly reduce infiltration losses (page ii)?
2) The existing marsh has been invaded by Phragmites. This
species is not desirable since it colonizes disturbed areas.
The land disturbing activities may allow Phragmites to take
over the sawgrass plantings. An eradication plan should be
developed for the preservation area in addition to the
proposed creation site.
3) DOT is using water table elevations from groundwater
observation wells that did not have a cement/bentonite seal.
The bentonite seal used had the consistency of wet
newspaper. The reason for using the bentonite seal was to
reduce cracking from a freeze/thaw. The wells were
installed in May. The probability of a freeze in May is
extremely low. A marsh system will normally have a water
table near the surface with extended periods of inundation.
DOT is basing the elevation on the Reference Ecosystem
elevation coupled with the water table data collected from
the wells in question. DEM is very concerned about the data
collected from the wells.
4) A major reason for preparing a mitigation plan is to
ascertain the quantity of water available to the site.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% past-consumer paper
0004
Mike Bell Memo
May 8, 1996
Page 2
The water budget calculated for this project has many
parameters that are not quantified. Clearly this plan does
not present data to show that enough water will be available
to create a marsh. Therefore, there is no assurance that
this site will function as proposed.
5) The elevation in the adjacent marsh is around elevation 1.0
ft. above msl. The grading plan takes the elevation to 2.0
ft. above msl. The plan states that this will be the
highest elevation but the majority of the elevations on
Figure 10 show 2.0 ft. above msl. Since groundwater
elevations may not be accurate, the need to replicate the
existing marsh elevation is even more critical.
6) How can the measured water levels at the Ballance Farm
reference site be above the ground surface (page 22)?
7) The description of the Ballance Farm Reference Ecosystem
should be included in this document. The Ballance Farm
mitigation plan probably would not be taken on-site for a
Casey Tract inspection.
8) Italics or another method should be used to highlight the
changes in the final plan.
DEM has provided these comments to assist DOT in developing
a successful mitigation plan. Please call Eric Galamb at 733-
1786 if you need clarification on any of these comments.
casey2.mit
cc: Steve Kroeger
David Robinson, DOT
John Dorney
FAXED
MAY 0 8 1996

?.a SCATe o
1
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GOVERNOR P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
April 4, 1996
Mr. Michael D. Smith, P.W.S.
Chief, North Section
Regulatory Branch
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
6512 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 105
Raleigh, NC 27615
Dear Mr. Smith:
GARLAND B. GARRETT JR.
SECRETARY
4p
U IR
,NT9C?e`FN??s
Re: Casey Tract Mitigation Plan
Action ID No. 199504770
We are pleased to transmit to you the Casey Tract Mitigation Plan and want to thank you and
your staff for all the constructive comments and suggestions which you have provided to us during
its preparation. This site provides a total of 3.58 mitigation credit acres, calculated as follows:
5.5 acres of marsh creation at 3:1 yielding 1.83 credits
11.9 acres of marsh preservation at 10:1 yielding 1.19 credits
4.0 acres of forested wetland preservation at 10:1 yielding 0.4 credits
2.4 acres of forested upland preservation at 15:1 yielding 0.16 credits
In combination with the Tucker Farm Mitigation Plan and the draft Ballance Farm
Mitigation Plan (transmitted to you under separate covers), there will be more than enough
mitigation credits to satisfy the requirements of the NC-168 widening project, R-2228, in Currituck
County.
It is our intent to begin implementation of this mitigation plan immediately. The first steps
are: (1) the establishment of a design team led by a member of the staff of the Roadway Design
Branch and (2) the development of an implementation schedule. Mr. Ted Devens of my staff will be
a member of this team and will be your principal contact for this mitigation project. He will be
responsible for communicating to you the progress of the project's design and implementation.
We look forward to the challenge of implementing the plan and to producing a successful
mitigation site.
Sincerely, %
David C. Robinson, Ph.D., P.E.
Permits and Wetland Mitigation Unit Head
Planning and Environmental Branch
Enclosure

4
Michael D. Smith
April 4, 1996
Page 2
cc: Mr. Dave Lekson, COE, Washington
Mr. Mike Bell, COE, DOT Coordinator, Washington
Mr. Lee Pelej, EPA, Atlanta
Mr. Roy Shelton, FHWA /
Mr. John Dorney, DEM, Water Quality Section ?
Mr. John Parker, DCM
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC
Mr. John Hefner, USFWS
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS
Mr. Don Morton, P.E., NCDOT, Highway Design
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P.E., NCDOT, Hydraulics Unit
Mr. W. D. Johnson, NCDOT, Roadside Environmental Unit
Mr. W. L. Moore, NCDOT, Geotechnical Unit
Mr. M. R. Turner, NCDOT, Division 1 Environmental Officer
Mr. D. R. Conner, P.E., NCDOT, Division 1, Division Engineer
Mr. T. E. Devens, P.E., NCDOT, Mitigation Coordinator
/ . ' V
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
Memorandum
To: Mike Be
USACOE
Through: John Do
From: Eric Ga
Subject: Comments on
Farm Site i
January 19, 1996
J&T?
dft
?EHNR
U (.,)
the Draft Mitigation Plan for the Tucker
n Currituck County
The NC DOT will be impacting approximately 13.08 acres of
forested wetlands with the widening of NC 168 (R-2228A). A draft
mitigation plan for the Tucker Farm site was developed to offset
the 13.08 acres of impact. The Division of Environmental
Management (DEM) has reviewed the November 14, 1995 draft
mitigation plan apd offers the following comments:
1) I do not. believe that timbered (from here on referred to as
cutover) wetlands should be part of the reference ecosystem
because of changes in evapotranspiration and other
environmental factors. The species composition from the
timbered area does not appear to be the same as the swamp
forest wetland.
2) Since the COE has determined the "reserved area,, in the
southeast portion of the site is jurisdictional wetlands,
DEM suggests that this area be identified for preservation
and included in the final plan. This area is 20.2 acres and
should qualify for 2.02 credits should the site be replanted
if the vegetation has been removed.
3) One important point stressed by the wetland Development and
Restoration course instructors is how critical monitoring
wells are to developing a successful mitigation plan. A
crack in the grout or not mounding the grout around the well
may lead to erroneous groundwater elevation data since
surface water can "leak" into the well. The consultants
used bentonite rather than cement/bentonite grout. The
wells should be refitted with a cement/bentonite grout to
obtain more accurate groundwater depths.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper

Mike Bell Memo
January 19, 1996
Page 2
4) I believe that a groundwater monitoring well should be
installed in the swamp forest wetland since that is the
wetland that DOT is attempting to duplicate/replicate.
5) The existing ditches that will not be filled in and the
proposed ditches will effectively lower the groundwater such
that adjacent land may no longer be wetlands. DEM requests
that the effect of these ditches on adjacent wetlands on and
off the Tucker property be quantified. The entire property
that DOT believes will be a jurisdictional wetland may not
be able to be successfully restored without this action.
The mitigation plan states on page 19, "Localized
groundwater flow toward the canal may occur during dry
periods". DEM believes that the flow will occur at all
times and not just during dry periods. Should DOT elect not
to examine the drainage effect from the ditches, groundwater
monitoring wells should be installed near (within 50 feet)
the ditches in order, to determine if the hydrology criteria
are satisfactorily met. Figure 5 shows the minimum depth of
the ditches. What is the maximu:? depth of the proposed
ditches?
6) DEM requests that DOT present the water budget information
in the following manner in addition to the narrative
presented irl the draft plan. The unknown value for the
drainage canal should be estimated.
Precipitation + 47.93 in/y-
-Evapotranspiration - 35.07 "
Surface loss - 5.29 (ditch plugs should slow some
of this loss but standing
:rater will have an increase
in evaporation)
Drainage canals - ????
Grand total + ???? in/yr
7) Cutover wetlands should not be given the standard
preservation ratio of 10:1 since the wetlands have been
impacted. If the timbered wetlands are revegetated, a 10:1
ratio would be acceptable.
8) DEM recommends that the Augusta soils not be used to block
the existing ditches because Augusta soils have the highest
permeability of the soils on-site.
9) The reference ecosystem has Nyssa biflora and Taxodium
distichum. Why are these species not proposed in the
planting scheme?
10) A minimum of six tree species should be planted with no more
Mike Bell Memo
January 19, 1996
Page 3
than 20% of any one species.
should be oaks.
In addition, not all species
11) To ensure that proper grading has occurred, an elevation map
should be drawn prior to planting. An as-built plan should
be submitted to DEM.
12) After the trees are planted, permanent random vegetative
monitoring plots should be staked in the field. To
establish the random plots, a standard ecological method
should be used.
13) DEM believes that the monitoring wells should be of the
continuous recording type. This will provide more data on
the water level and thus interpretation of success/failure
of the hydrology criteria will be easier. Furthermore, the
mitigation plan should have a discussion for hydrologic
monitoring in the Monitoring Time-Frame section on page 26.
14) After grading but prior to planting, an elevation map should
be created.
15) DEM requests that DOT negotiate the final management/
dispensation'of the site and include this information in the
final mitigation plan.
DEM.has provided these comments to assist DOT in developing
a successful mitigation plan. Please call Eric Galamb at 733-
1786 if you need clarification on any of these comments.
tucker.mit
cc: Steve Kroeger
David Robinson, DOT
,.. _ ,_j
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
January 24, 1996
Memorandum
IN 154A,
Adft
[D FE F1
To: Mike Bell
USACOE
Through: John Dorne+D
From: Eric Galam
Subject: Comments on the Draft Mitigation =tan for the Casey
Tract in Currituck County
The NC DOT will be impacting approxima=ely 1.44 acres of
coastal marsh wetlands with the widening of NC 168 (R-2228A). A
draft mitigation plan for the Casey Tract was developed to offset
the 1.44 acres of impact. The Division of Environmental
Management (DEM) Has reviewed the November _4, 1995 draft
mitigation plan axid offers the following co=ents:
1) I do not believe that runoff loss was correctly modeled
since it was modeled with woods-as the future wetlands type.
Since the area is to be a marsh it shc-;ld have a different
crop runoff coefficient.
2) The ditches on the site are to handle .rind driven hydrology.
Normally ditches drain wetlands. How can we be assured that
these ditches will not lower the water table?
3) One important point stressed by the We=land Development and
Restoration course instructors is how critical monitoring
wells are to developing a successful rL*tigation plan. A
crack in the grout or not mounding the grout around the well
may lead to erroneous groundwater elevation data since
surface water can "leak" into the well. This is
particularly true since there was standing water in the
swamps when groundwater elevation data was collected. The
consultants used bentonite rather than cement/bentonite
grout. The wells should be refitted v:_th a cement/bentonite
grout to obtain more accurate groundwater depths.
4) DOT is requesting credits for upland forest. Uplands should
receive credit when they are helping is protect important
wetland functions but the appropriate ratio is unclear.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
Mike Bell Memo
January 24, 1996
Page 2
Since wetland preservation ratio is generally 10:1, the
ratio should be higher for upland preservation. The ratio
DEM recommends is between 15-20:1 provided that the wetland
plan is successful.
5) The existing ditches that will not be filled in and the
proposed ditches will effectively lower the groundwater.
For these ditches', the adjacent land may no longer be
wetlands.. DEM requests that the effect of these ditches or
adjacent wetlands on and off the Casey property be
quantified. The entire area that DOT believes will be a
jurisdictional wetland may not be able to be successfully
restored without this action. Should DOT elect not to
examine the drainage effect from the ditches, groundwater
monitoring wells should be installed near (within 50 feet)
the ditches in order to determine if the hydrology criteria
are satisfactorily met. Figure 5 shows the minimum depth of
the ditches. What is the maximum depth of the proposed
ditches?
6) DEM requests that DOT present the water budget information
in the following tabular manner in addition to the narrative
presented in the draft plan. The unknown values of the
drainage canals and the creeks should be estimated.
Precipitation
Evapotranspiration
Surface loss
Drainage canals
Creeks
Grand total
+ 47.93 in/yr
- 40.46 "
- 3.39 "
+ ???? in/yr
(standing water has
increased evaporation)
7) Will the elevated road be graded down to the mitigation
elevation? Is it included in the credits or will it remain
as upland?
8) Please provide a clearer Figure 6. Zone 2 did not show up
well on my copy.
9) Clarification is needed regarding the statement found on
page 23, "Final site grades may be adjusted based upon
actual field conditions." DEM was under the impression than
the grading elevations have already been determined.
Therefore, what are the actual field conditions? There was
a discussion that hydric soils from the NC 168 project will
be placed on the site. The mitigation plan is unclear
whether the grading plan has already taken this additional
soil into consideration.

Mike Bell Memo
January 24, 1996
Page 3
10) To ensure that proper grading has occurred, an elevation map
should be drawn prior to planting. An as-built plan should
be submitted to DEM.
11) The section on the number of sample plots and vegetation
sampling should be clearer. The number of plots sampled
should reflect the size and heterogeneity of the area being
sampled. Five plots may be a minimum. The location of the
plots should not be "selected." They should be determined
in a random or stratified random manner after the area is
planted. To establish the random plots, a standard
ecological method should be used.
Determining species abundance for rhizomatous or multi-
stemmed herbaceous species can take considerable time.
Although abundance (or density) is an appropriate measure
for woody species, it is usually not determined for
herbaceous species. All species present in a sample plot
should be identified to the lowest taxonomic level possible.
Time spent counting stems of species such as grasses would
be better spent sampling additional plots. Species cover
can be estimated visually. Usually cover is estimated as
the percentage of ground surface covered by vegetation when
looking down from above. Cover represents the vertical
projection of plant parts (stems and leaves) onto the ground
and approximates the area over which a species exerts
influence. Cover of a species may range from 0 to 100% in
each plot. Because of species overlay, total cover for all
species may be greater that 100%. Therefore, the area of
ground not covered by vegetation should also be estimated.
Plot sizes of one meter square may be inadequate when
species are planted on two foot centers. There is no
definite suggestion on determining the best size sample
plot. We feel that one square meter is too small and
suggest a 1 x 2 meter sample plot.
kt?
Determining successucriteria can be more difficult for
herbaceous species &htrC for woody ones. It can be difficult
to determine survival rate if the species is able to spread
quickly through vegetative reproduction or is multi-stemmed.
We suggest that the frequency of plots in which a species
occurs and the cover of the species be used. An aerial
coverage of 50% at the end of three years is too low. A
cover of at least 75% is more appropriate, and could include
those wetland species that become established naturally.
12) Insert the word vegetation at the beginning of the sentence,
"Monitoring will take place..." on page 25.
13) DEM believes that the monitoring wells should be of the
Mike Bell Memo
January 24, 1996
Page 4
of the hydrology criteria will be easier. Furthermore, the
mitigation plan should have a discussion for hydrologic
monitoring in the Monitoring Time-Frame.
14) DEM believes that living vegetative cover should be at least
75% in order to be successful. A rate of 50% coverage is
too low.
15) DEM requests that DOT negotiate the final management/
dispensation of the site and include this information in the
final mitigation plan.
DEM has provided these comments to assist DOT in developing
a successful mitigation plan. Please call Eric Galamb at 733-
1786 if you need clarification on any of'these comments.
casey.mit
cc: Steve Kroeger
David Robinson, DOT

` KN North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Gordon Cashin
NCDOT, Planning and Environmental Branch
FROM: David Cox, Highway Project Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: November 9, 1995
SUBJECT: Comments on the wetland mitigation plan for the Casey Tract and Tucker Farm
Mitigation Sites in Currituck County, North Carolina.
Staff biologists with the N. C. Wildlife Resources Commission have reviewed the subject
mitigation plan and have the following comments. Our comments are provided in accordance
with certain provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16
U.S.C. 661-667d).
Our comments are as follows:
Casey Tract
1. We feel that the area of marsh creation may be subject to invasion by more
aggressive species that exist in the surrounding marsh. Disturbed areas such as the
excavations proposed on this site are more susceptible to colonization by
Phragmites australis and Typha latifolia. NCDOT should include a contingency plan
to deal with these invasive species.
2. After discussing the plan with persons whom have had experience with marsh
restoration, we feel that the distribution of the organic muck may not be necessary.
Other marsh restoration/creation sites have been established on mineral soils and
have been successful. The organic muck may also contain seeds and root stock
from undesirable species such as cattails and phragmites. We suggest that NCDOT
contact Dr. Steve Broome, in the Soil Science Department at N.C. State University
for more information.
Memo 2 November 9, 1995
3. NCDOT should discuss possible impacts to the hydrology of the swamp forest area
that may result from the excavation of the proposed channel.
4. The marsh area should be graded and planted prior to opening the channel to the
creek in order to establish the vegetation and allow sufficient time for the site to \b? \?,???
stabilize prior to being subjected to the washing actions of the tide.
5. We feel that the monitoring plan and success criteria are inadequate. We
recommend that survival of planted species be held to 75%. Furthermore, 50%
coverage in a marsh area over a 3 year period is unacceptable. Coverage should
also be 75% to meet the success criteria. Phragmites australis and Typha latifolia 3z ?? ?should not contribute to coverage success. `h
Tucker Farm Tract
1. The planting plan should specify the number of species that will be planted. We
recommend five or more species be planted. 'vim Q3
a-`i
2. A portion of the existing agricultural fields would likely meet wetland hydrology. We
feel that the portions that meet wetland hydrology and are to be "enhanced" by
plugging ditches and planting trees receive enhancement credits, (4:1). Areas that
currently do not meet wetland hydrology and which will have wetland hydrology
"restored" should receive restoration credit, (2:1).
3. We also question the normal preservation ratio of 10:1 for the cutover area. We do
not feel this area should receive the same mitigation credits as preservation of old
growth bottomland hardwoods. We fell that a ratio of 20:1 may be more appropriate.
Generally, we feel that the proposed mitigation plans, if successful, will provide some
measure of mitigation for the impacts associated with the widening of NC 168. However, some
further revisions will be necessary. When new information becomes available please provide
copies to the appropriate agencies for review.
We also request that prior to submittal of the final mitigation plans, NCDOT hold a site
visit to allow the commenting agencies an opportunity to view these mitigation sites.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this mitigation plan. If we can be of any
assistance please contact me at [phone].
cc: Eric Galamb, DEM Water Quality Section
Mike Bell, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Raleigh
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
February 4, 1996
Colonel Robert Sperberg
(Attn: Mike Bell, Washington Office)
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Field Office
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
Re: NC 168 From US 158 at Barco to the VA state line
Currituck County, North Carolina (TIP No. R-2228)
Dear Colonel Sperberg:
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the North Carolina Department of
Transportation's (NCDOT) draft mitigation plans for the above-referenced project.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed the November 14, 1995
revisions to the Casey Tract and Tucker Farm Mitigation Plans and offer the
following recommendations. This report is provided in accordance with provisions
of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 661-667d) and
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act).
This report also serves as comments to state resource agencies in their
permitting and/or-certification processes.
There is some confusion regarding the overall wetland impact acreage for the
entire project. The State Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant
Impact for R-2228 report that 26.5 acres of wetlands would be impacted by this
project. Subsequent documents report varying impact acreage figures. A letter
dated October 6, 1995 from the NCDOT to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
states that the impact acreage is 47.36 acres. Please clarify for the public
record the wetland impact acreage for the entire project in addition to the
acreage associated with each segment of the project.
It is our understanding that the widening of NC 168 is being implemented in three
segments and that the proposed mitigation plans were developed as partial
compensatory mitigation for losses associated with two of the segments (TIP Nos.
R-2228BB and R-2228A). We recommend that further permit authorizations be held
in abeyance until compensatory mitigation has been secured for wetland impacts
associated with all three segments of this project.
We have some concern regarding the portions of both mitigation sites that are
located within 150 feet of NC 168. It is unclear whether or not the NC 168
highway depicted in the blue lines portrays pre- or post-widening conditions.
Also, we question the extent of effective drainage of the highway ditches and/or
clearing right of ways on the mitigation area. Due to current or future widening
of NC 168 and/or extent of effective drainage or clearing right of ways it may
be appropriate to exclude the 150-foot zone adjacent to NC 168 from the
mitigation areas.
It is extremely important that permit applicants be able to ensure the protection
of compensatory mitigation sites in perpetuity. Both mitigation plans state that
NCDOT may or may not negotiate with other agencies to determine final management
of the mitigation areas once success is achieved. This degree of uncertainty as

to the final dispensation of the mitigation properties is unacceptable to the
Service. The NCDOT must make arrangements to protect the property through
permanent conservation easement held by a third-party grantee such as a land
trust or donate the land to a non-profit entity or resource agency. Deed
restrictions are an inadequate means of protecting mitigation areas of this size.
Arrangements that ensure perpetual protection of these properties should.-be
clearing outlined in writing and prerequisite to approval of the mitigation plans
by permitting agencies.
The Service has not reviewed these mitigation areas in the field and may have
additional site specific comments at such time. Site visits have been scheduled
for February 6th and/or 7th at which point we can discuss issues further. The
Service has reviewed the November 9, 1995 comments of the N.C. Wildlife Resources
Commission and supports their recommendations. We would like to add and
reiterate a few points.
o After reviewing the photographs'of the Tucker Farm site, we also recommend
that the area be preserved at a mitigation ratio of 20:1. The area
appears highly impacted by recent timbering operations and should not
receive the credit of a mature undisturbed stand of forested wetland.
o The success of reforestation at Tucker Farm site would be enhanced if
containerized stock was planted versus bare root stock. Mast-producing
species should be highly represented.
o Only those portions of the prior converted cropland restoration area that
are currently effectively drained should receive a mitigation ratio of
2:1. The remainder should receive enhancement credit at a ratio of 4:1.
o It is unclear what corrective measures would be employed to remove
undesirable or nuisance species from the mitigation areas. No herbicides
should be used within the mitigation areas unless specifically approved by
resource agencies.
o Please clarify whether hydric soils from impacted areas would or would not
be stockpiled for use within the creation areas at the Casey Tract. Also
more discussion should take place regarding the hydrology associated with
extension of existing ditches through the marsh creation area. We are
concerned about the creation of stagnant water pockets and are unclear
about the proposal, i.e. if and/or how water would circulate through this
area.
o The success criteria for marsh creation at Casey Tract should be based on
at least 75 percent coverage of desired hydrophytic species surviving
after three years.
o We do not object to some credit being applied to the preservation of
mature, forested upland buffers within the mitigation areas.
We acknowledge and appreciate NCDOT's effort to provide in-kind, on-site
replacement of wetland functions and values. Please continue to advise us of the
progress towards resolution of these issues. If our office can supply any
additional information or clarification, please contact Katherine Doak, the
biologist reviewing this project, at (919)-856-4520, ext 19.
Sincerely yours,
Cherry Green
Acting Field Supervisor
CG/KHD/SMZ

CC: NCDEHNR-DEM
NCDEHNR-DCM
NCWRC
NMFS
NCDOT
FHWA
FWS/R4/KDoak/KHD:2-4-96/919-856-4520 ext 19/wp:R2228.MIT
FWS/R4/SZwicker/SMZ:12-11-95/919-856-4520 ext 16/wp:US13NC11.FON
NCWRC,HCP,FALLS LAKE TEL:[phone] May 07'96 12:33 No.008 P.02
Norrlh. Caroms Wildlife Resources Commission P
512 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolinas 27604-1188,919,7333391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: H. Franklin Vick, Manager
Planning and Environmental Branch, NCDOT
FROM: David Cox, Highway project C tar
Habitat Conservation Pro
DATE: May 7, 1996
SUBJECT: Tucker Farm and Casey Tract Wetland Mitigation Plans
Staff biologists with North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have
reviewed the mitigation plans and our comments are provided in accordance with certain
provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661
et, seq.) and the Clear, Water Act of 1977 (33 U.S.C. 466 et seq).
We remain concerned about several aspects of the subject mitigation plans. General
information that needs to be, provided for both plans includes:
1. impact acreages should be corrected and provided as a supplement to both plans.
2. Both plans include the statement "Final planting scheme, planting methodology and
tinting, exact p1wit species, plant source, details on fertility testing and use of fertilizer will be,
included in the implementation plan to be prepared by NCDOT." We feel this statement is
misleading. It is our understanding that this is the fmi ail mitigation plan. Things such as plant
species, planting schedule, acid planting scheme should not be subject to revision. We
recommend that this statement be revised to indicate which aspects of the plan are indeed final.
We have the following comments can each specific plan.
NCWRC,HCP,FALLS LAKE TEL:[phone] May 07'96 12:33 No.008 P.03
Tucker Farm
1, Section 6.3 Referenoe Ecosystem. The reference ecosystem (RE) that has been
identified for the Tucker Farm site is unacceptable. The RE is on the proposed Ballancc Farm
Mitigation site. After reviewing the information provided in this document and the Rallance
Farm Mitigation plan we are convinced that the area identified as the RE for both sites has been
heavily impacted. There are existing ditches in close proximity to the RE and the vegetation
composition is indicative of a disturbed system. We feel that mitigation site hydrology should be
modeled after the RE and that this same hydrology should establish the success criteria. A better
RE must be identified.
2. Section 6.7 Monitoring Flan. (Evaluation and Recourse Action) A survival rate of
50% ("of plantings" should be specified) is acceptable, however, the purpose of 50% aerial
coverage is unclear. This criteria is more applicable to marsh creation and should be deleted
from this plan. Hydrologic success should be determined from the RE and should not be the
Corps of Engineers definition. Monitoring for 5 years is recommended for forested wetland
mitigation sites due to the slow growth of hardwood seedlings. At the cnd of three years the
hardwood seedlings have not become visible above the herbaceous species present on these sites.
At five years the trees have gained enough height to easily evaluate survival.
3. There is discussion of placing perimeter berms around the site to prevent surface
runoff, It may also be necessary to place berms in the interior of the site to more evenly
distribute the surface water as ponding is likely to occur with only perimeter berms.
Casey Tract
1. Section 5,8 Monitoring Plan. We agree with the survival rate of 50% of the planted
species and 75% aerial coverage at the end of three years. However, we do not agree with the
criteria that at least 50% of species present within the mitigation site be facultative wet or
obligate. This is a marsh creation site. Therefore, no species other than targeted marsh species
should contribute to the success of the site. Cattails and phragmites should not be included to
meet the success criteria. There is also no discussion of remedial action to control nuisance
vegetation.
We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the mitigation plans. If we can be of
further assistance please call me at [phone].
cc: Eric Galamb, DEM, Raleigh
Mikc Bell, USACOE, Washington
10 y r
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636-3726
February 4, 1996
Colonel Robert Sperberg
(Attn: Mike Bell, Washington Office)
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Field Office
P.O. Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
Re: NC 168 From US 158 at Barco to the VA state line
Currituck County, North Carolina (TIP No. R-2228)
Dear Colonel Sperberg:
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the North Carolina Department of
Transportation's (NCDOT) draft mitigation plans for the above-referenced project.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) has reviewed the November 14, 1995
revisions to the Casey Tract and Tucker Farm Mitigation Plans and offer the
following recommendations. This report is provided in accordance with provisions
of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 661-667d) and
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543) (Act).
This report also serves as comments to state resource agencies in their
permitting and/or certification processes.
There is some confusion regarding the overall wetland impact acreage for the
entire project. The State Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant
Impact for R-2228 report that 26.5 acres of wetlands would be impacted by this
project. Subsequent documents report varying impact acreage figures. A letter
dated October 6, 1995 from the NCDOT to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE)
states that the impact acreage is 47.36 acres. Please clarify for the public
record the wetland impact acreage for the entire project in addition to the
acreage associated with each segment of the project.
It is our understanding that the widening of NC 168 is being implemented in three
segments and that the proposed mitigation plans were developed as partial
compensatory mitigation for losses associated with two of the segments (TIP Nos.
R-2228BB and R-2228A). We recommend that further permit authorizations be held
in abeyance until compensatory mitigation has been secured for wetland impacts
associated with all three segments of this project.
4Ve have some concern regarding the portions of both mitigation sites that are
located within 150 feet of NC 168. It is unclear whether or not the NC 168
highway depicted in the blue lines portrays pre- or post-widening conditions.
Also, we question the extent of effective drainage of the highway ditches and/or
clearing right of ways on the mitigation area. Due to current or future widening.
of NC 168 and/or extent of effective drainage or clearing right of ways it may'`
be appropriate to exclude the 150-foot zone adjacent to NC 168 from the
mitigation areas.
It is extremely important that permit applicants be able to ensure the protection
of compensatory mitigation sites in perpetuity. Both mitigation plans state that
NCDOT may or may not negotiate with other agencies to determine final management
of the mitigation areas once success is achieved. This degree of uncertainty as
ft- -0 lb
to the final dispensation of the mitigation properties is unacceptable to the
Service. The NCDOT must make arrangements to protect the property through
permanent conservation easement held by a third-party grantee such as a land
trust or donate the land to a non-profit entity or resource agency. Deed
restrictions are an inadequate means of protecting mitigation areas of this size.
Arrangements that ensure perpetual protection of these properties should be
clearing outlined in writing and prerequisite to approval of the mitigation plans
by permitting agencies.
The Service has not reviewed these mitigation areas in the field and may have
additional site specific comments at such time. Site visits have been scheduled
for February 6th and/or 7th at which point we can discuss issues further. The
Service has reviewed the November 9, 1995 comments of the N.C. Wildlife Resources
Commission and supports their recommendations. We would like to add and
reiterate a few points.
o After reviewing the photographs of the Tucker Farm site, we also recommend
that the area be preserved at a mitigation ratio of 20:1. The area
appears highly impacted by recent timbering operations and should not
receive the credit of a mature undisturbed stand of forested wetland.
o The success of reforestation at Tucker Farm site would be enhanced if
containerized stock was planted versus bare root stock. Mast-producing
species should be highly represented.
o Only those portions of the prior converted cropland restoration area that
are currently effectively drained should receive a mitigation ratio of
2:1. The remainder should receive enhancement credit at a ratio of 4:1.
o It is unclear what corrective measures would be employed to remove
undesirable or nuisance species from the mitigation areas. No herbicides
should be used within the mitigation areas unless specifically approved by
resource agencies.
o Please clarify whether hydric soils from impacted areas would or would not
be stockpiled for use within the creation areas at the Casey Tract. Also
more discussion should take place regarding the hydrology associated with
extension of existing ditches through the marsh creation area. We are
concerned about the creation of stagnant water pockets and are unclear
about the proposal, i.e. if and/or how water would circulate through this
area.
o The success criteria for marsh creation at Casey Tract should be based on
at least 75 percent coverage of desired hydrophytic species surviving
after three years.
o We do not object to some credit being applied to the preservation of
mature, forested upland buffers within the mitigation areas.
We acknowledge and appreciate NCDOT's effort to provide in-kind, on-site
replacement of wetland functions and values. Please continue to advise us of the
progress towards. resolution of these issues. If our office can supply any
additional information or clarification, please contact Katherine Doak, the
biologist reviewing this project, at (919)-856-4520, ext 19.
Sincerely yours,
Cherry Green
Acting Field Supervisor
CG/KHD/SMZ
r'
CC: NCDEHNR-DEM
NCDEHNR-DCM
NCWRC
NMFS
NCDOT
FHWA
FWS/R4/KDoak/KHD:2-4-96/919-856-4520 ext 19/wp:R2228.M2T
FWS/R4/SZwicker/SMZ:12-11-95/919-856-4520 ext 16/wp:US13NC11.FON
'MEMO
TO:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
?AJOP
coo : fj Dry
ef 9
G ?4 p 75 ?7L G°6eo 1
01
rdav I/V,
STATt w C?un ' ?.- ?adr
*ko- ni? ew)-tu
1)
Z(Om -
dg')
aj wt R?
From*
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources g?? Printed on Recycled Paper
(MEMO
TO:t

4d

From:
DATE:
SUBJECT:

.L' 6
?`? srnrE
M?Y North Carolina Department of Environment,
o s ?a
Health, and Natural Resources gp 6 6
Printed on Recycled Paper
QUnM
.iii
x
`-4.
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
James B. Hunt, Jr„ Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
Roger N. Schecter, Director
Ms. Robin Little
Permits and Wetland Mitigation Unit
Planning and Environmental Branch
NC DOT
P.O. Box 25201
Raleigh, NC 27611-5201
May 3, 1996
Re: NC 168 Road Widening
Ballance, Casey and Tucker Mitigation Plans/Comments
Dear Ms. Little:
?oJTA` ?J996
This letter is in regard to the subject road project and the
corresponding proposed mitigation.
The projected impacts from this road project will impact
hardwood forested wetlands, freshwater wetlands and coastal marsh
wetlands, as well as some public trust waters. The Ballance and
Casey sites have been proposed to compensate for primarily coastal
wetland impacts, although significant amounts of 1404' wetland
compensation is proposed for these site. The Tucker site and Plan
have been proposed to compensate for 14041 wetland impacts from the
NC 168 road project.
As you are aware, on February 6, 1996, NC DOT conducted an on-
site review of the Ballance, Casey and Tucker Mitigation sites, all
located in Currituck County, near Sligo. This meeting was attended
by several resource agencies and was held prior to the completion
of the Ballance Site Mitigation Plan. The Ballance Plan and site,
along with the Tucker and Casey Mitigation Plans/sites, have been
proposed in part to comply with LAMA Major Permit No. 139-94
conditions and to compensate for wetland impacts which will occur
due to road up-grade activity by NC DOT along NC 168 in Currituck
County between the Virginia - North Carolina State Line and Barco,
North Carolina.
Prior to receiving the Ballance Mitigation Plan, NC DOT's
wetland consultant for this project, Resource Southeast, Ltd.
requested confirmation of their coastal wetland delineation of the
Ballance site. My confirmation regarding this wetland delineation
was provided to RSL in my March 19, 1996 letter to Ms. Lynn Stemmy.
The coastal wetland delineation confirmation for the Ballance and
Casey tracts was sent to you in my April 8, 1996 correspondence.
LT.
[DIEHNFZ
1367 U.S. 17 South, Elizabeth City, North Carolina 27909 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper

Ms. Robin Little
Ballance, Casey and Tucker Mitigation Plans/Comments
May 3, 1996
Page Two
The proposed sites are within the same drainage area as the
wetland areas which will be impacted by NC DOT's 168 road
improvements. It is my interpretation that these Plans commit to
preserving these mitigation sites into perpetuity and will also
provide for future mitigation needs.
I have reviewed copies of the subject plans. These Plans
include a review and analysis of existing data, wetland
delineations and Phase I Environmental Site Assessments for each of
the three sites.
Although these plans do not appear to include any direct
stream flow data for the adjacent public trust waters which will
either directly or indirectly provide the hydrology for these
sites, they do include analysis of existing soils, groundwater
modelling and water budgets, as well as overall proposed grading
and mitigation concept layouts. These mitigation layouts include
only the general wetland types but not the specific plant species.
The Plans do state that either obligate or facultative-wet plant
classification plant species will be used.
Through groundwater modelling, these current Plans document
that with drainage and grading modifications, these sites will
provide successful coastal and forested wetland mitigation sites.
These plans propose a 3:1 (or possibly better) compensation ratio
for coastal wetland impacts for the NC 168 road work. The Ballance
Plan proposes a total coastal wetland mitigation potential of 61
acres. As stated in these plans, final construction and planting
specifications for these sites will be prepared once these current
Plans are approved.
Although these Plans do not specify a specific plant schedule,
they do state that once approved, such details will be set forth in
an Implementation Plan for each site. I do not object to this
concept.
Although it is unclear at this time whether all or which of
these sites will be used for the required mitigation for CAMA Major
Permit No. 139-94, it is my understanding that the implementation
plan(s) will resolve this question. It is also my understanding
that the implementation plan(s) will specify detailed grading and
planting criteria including plant species types and alternatives,
plant sources, planting time, planting methods, site maintenance
and monitoring specifications. So long as these specifications are
provided in the future plan(s), I have no objections to these
current mitigation plans. I do believe these sites will provide
successful mitigation sites provided the drainage is modified as
such to provide enough hydrology to the site(s) and appropriate
plant stock and planting methods are utilized.

Ms. Robin Little
Ballance, Casey and Tucker Mitigation Plans/Comments
May 3, 1996
Page Three
It is my understanding, through our telephone conversation
yesterday, that the actual mitigation site work will not commence
until 1997. I would appreciate a time table on the completion of
the implementation plan(s) as soon as possible.
We appreciate your Departments efforts concerning this project
and look forward to reviewing the upcoming implementation plans.
sincerely,
Dennis W. Hawthorn
Field Representative
DCM Elizabeth City Office
cc: Preston Pate,
John Parker
Eric Lamb, NC
Mike Bell, US
M.R. Turner,
Jr.
DEM
COE
NC DOT
oa SUt?o
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR.
GOVERNOR
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
P.O. BOX 25201. RALEIGH. N.C. 27611-5201
April 4, 1996
Mr. Michael D. Smith, P.W.S.
Chief, North Section
Regulatory Branch
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
6512 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 105
Raleigh, NC 27615
Dear Mr. Smith:
Re: Tucker Farm Mitigation Plan
Action ID No. 199504770
GARLAND B. GARRETC J R.
SECRETARY
R6cFltl??
019
,M,,R01V 1996
We are pleased to transmit to you the Tucker Farm Mitigation Plan and want to thank you
and your staff for all the constructive comments and suggestions which you have provided to us
- --- during its preparation. This site provides a total of 13.41 mitigation credit acres calculated as
follows:
25.1 acres of pc restoration at 2:1 yielding 12.55 credits
2.8 acres of swamp forest preservation at 10:1 yielding 0.28 credits
8.7 acres of timbered wetland preservation at 15:1 yielding (.58 credits
In combination with the Casey Tract Mitigation Plan and the draft Ballance Farm Mitigation
Plan (transmitted to you under separate covers), there will be more than enough mitigation credits to
satisfy the requirements of the NC-168 widening project, R-2228, iri Currituck County.
It is our intent to begin implementation of this mitigation plan immediately. The first steps
are: (1) the establishment of a design team led by a member of the staff of the Roadway Design
Branch and (2) the development of an implementation schedule. Mr. Ted Devens of my staff will be
a member of this team and will be your principal contact for this mitigation project. He will be
responsible for communicating to you the progress of the project's design and implementation.
We look forward to the challenge of implementing the plan and to producing a successful
Y mitigation site.
Sincerely,
lick
David C. Robinson, Ph.D., P.E.
Permits and Wetland Mitigation Unit Head
Planning and Environmental Branch
Enclosure

,!'*4
OP April 4, 1996
Page 2
cc: Mr. Dave Lekson, COE, Washington
Mr. Mike Bell, COE, DOT Coordinator, Washington
Mr. Lee Pelej, EPA, Atlanta
Mr. Roy Shelton, FHWA
Mr. John Dorney, DEM, Water Quality Section V/
Mr. John Parker, DCM
Mr. David Cox, NCWRC
Mr. John Hefner, USFWS
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS
Mr. Don Morton, P.E., NCDOT, Highway Design
Mr. A. L. Hankins, P.E., NCDOT, Hydraulics Unit
Mr. W. D. Johnson, NCDOT, Roadside Environmental Unit
Mr. W. L. Moore, NCDOT, Geotechnical Unit
Mr. M. R. Turner, NCDOT, Division 1 Environmental Officer
Mr. D. R. Conner, P.E., NCDOT, Division 1, Division Engineer
Mr. T. E. Devens, P.E., NCDOT, Mitigation Coordinator

STATE OF NUR'Cti OROLINA
DEPARTMENT Of MIANSPORTATIO N
GARIAND B. c??? IP,
jAmts B. HUNT ]R. DM$iQN 01: HIC14WAYS SKBOAKY
C,OVCRNok P.0, BOX 25201. WEIGH, N.C. 27611.5201
PLANNING & t MRUNMB'NTAL BRANCft
FAX CoTR SMET
Date: jv.p,`t 22 l tst b
Number You Are Calling;
Please delinr the following pages to:
Name; tC Cerf?
Department andfor Firm: ?
Address or Room Number.
pE '""`?$ D
This TeleoVy is bung sent by.,
??1'T? GI?'r1p M t1N''t" 091'?11
Phone Mvmb?er: ?? c
Remarks:
N t - l 6 ?' rf?t ?{C?
Number of pages (Including Craver Sheen
IF Yor Do NOT RRCFJW ALL PAGES CLEARLY, Cwt (0i-9) 733-3141 AS
SOONASPOSSIBL&
pUWING & ENnRoIVMENT,IL BRANCH I'AX'NUMBER - [phone]
Awl%
Od EEL# _? :ON 131 Wd l f1N3 QN J 9N I NNU-1d :ET Q3M 96 , -E?--AI JW
a '
yy A? r
t
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT of TMNSPORTATION
JAmts B. HUNT JR. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
GOVERNOR P.O. 80X25201. RALEIGH, KC. 27611-5ZQI
May 22; 1996
Mr. Michael Bell
Washington Regulatory Field Office
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
P. D. Box 1000
Washington, NC 27889-1000
Dear Mr_ Sell:
Re: Tucker Farm and Casey Tract Mitigation Plans
I am responding to our telephone conversations of May 20 and May 22, 1996 regarding the
four remaining issues concerning the above plans, namely: (1) unacceptable reference site, (2) site
ownership and future disposition, (3) plant survival rate, and (4) length of monitoring period.
Item 12 Within one month of receiving the permits, we will initiate work with the various
review agencies to identify and document a more suitable reference site. We believe that an
additional period of four months Should be allowed to complete this task, since we will first need to
complete contractual arrangements with atir consultant prior to commencing work, then search for
sites, and finally get permission from the landowners to gain entry to the sitar, prior to heing able to
gather sufficient descriptive information about the sites to enable a selection to take place.
Item 2: At present, the Tucker Farm, the Casey Tract and the Bal lance Farm are owned by
the Department of Transportation. No definite plans have been made for turning the sites over to
another agency after the specified monitoring period is over (or earlier, once success is achieved),
but that will be worked on in the interim. If no agency Is willing to accept the sites, then the
Department will retain ownership and manage them in perpetuity.
Item-3! We are willing to accept your proposal regarding plant survival rate.
Item 4: We accept that the monitoring period for these sites will be at most five years, but
reyiieat it be less if success is achieved earlier to the satisfaction of the agencies.
I hope that this letter is sufficient for the permit to be issued for the NC 168 highway
improvement project.
Sincerely,
bl-64
cc: Robin Little
David Cox
Eric Ualamb
dOd dEL#
David C. Robinson
GARLAND B. Gna•RETr Jet.
SECRMAW

:ON X31 NOd I nN3 QNd 9N I NNd-1d : a I EE : € ti C13M 96 4 -EE-A
A. V .
Q'? A
'4an1/
STATE of NORTH AOLINA
DENRTMENT OF IW NSPORT TYO N RLWD 13. Gr tutr 3R.
JAMES B. HUNS' JP- ?? ))I I 1 ?E GHI NHC.?2 bi152Q1 SECK'tnaY
Gova"OFL
April 30,1996

MEMUMI.W 3M'1'O: Mike Heil
FROM: David Robinson D
SUB]ECT: Tucker Farm, Casey Tract, Ballance Farm Mit1gation Plans;
Request for Additional Information
Following up on your telephone call of April 29,• 1996 with Robin Little, the following
additional information should answer your questions: •
Application marsh
mpamt Forestod
lmvaci;:
1131196 p
R-2228A 1.44 acl 13.49 ae•
1131196 R-2228BA 0.89 8c. 8.09 ac.
10(6!95
101619 R-2228BB 0.0380.
A ditloaL_
-
The credits available at each of the sites arc as follows: .
y
s`?
(page 27) MRI'k11,t CrEdlts:
creation:
- 5.5 ac. @ 3:1 yields 1,83 credits
- presmatlon: 11.9 ac. @ 10:1 yields 1.19 credits
Cadits:

brest - upland buffer:
1.5:1 yields 0.16 credits
2.4 ac.
- preservation (wetland) 4.0 ac, @ 10:1 yields 0.40 credits
MWW-Ea
(page 28)
ForestForW Credits: .13. 1
- restoration:

25.1 am (a 2:1 yields 12.55 credits
- preservation (buffer) 2.$ ac. @ 10:1 yields 0.28 credits
@i 15:1 yields 0.58 credits
7 ac
9
- preservation (cutover) .
.
BAUWm .Etu'JSl
(page 51) 25.E
mhImdiIs.
creation:
61.0 ac. c@ 3:1 yields 20.33 credits
-
- preservation: 50.4 ac. as 10:1 yields 5.00 credits
Forest
- restoration: 236.0 aa. 2:1 yields 11810 credits

ioids 5.1 credits
10.1
- preservation: y
51.0 acl @
@ 1.5;1 yields 3.5 credits
3 ac
5
. Upland buffer: .
.

zOd 9LS# :ON 131 NOd I nN3 QNd
. - -1.
?]I NN61d : Q I 82 : S ti I?jj
Mike Bell
April 30, 1996
Page 2
A comparison of the impact acres of the highway prOJeots and the available credits at Casey
Tract, Tucker Farm, and Ballance Farm are as follows:
nh Impacts: 2.36 ac.
credits. 28.53
(3.02 at
a
t Ballance Farm)
25.31
1:9X= Impacts: 21.67 ac.
Credits: 140.57
(0.56 at Casey Tract,
13.41 at Tucker Farm, and .
126.6 at Ballance Farm)
it can be seen that 10,0 percent of the marsh impacts (2.36 acres) can be mitigated at the
Casey Tract, while about 65 percent (13.97 acres) of the forest impacts (21.67 acres) can be
mitigated at the Casey Tract and at Tucker Farim. The remaining 3 S portent of the forest impacts
(7.7 acres) are to be mitigated at the Ballance Farm_ At a 2:1 ratio, the credits needed from 13allante
Farm are 15 A, which is only 12 percent of the total amount available at Ballance.
Therefore, ire consideration of the fact that you already have the final plans for Tucker Farm
and the Casey Tract, and a draft plan for Ballance Farm which has been prepared taking your
comments on Casey and Tucker into consideration (as well as the additional information from this
end yesterday's memoranda), we request that you recommend issuance of the permits for hWh
projects for which this mitigation is proposed, namely R-2228A and R-2228HA.
In addition, I have attached the anticipated production scheduloe for the Tucker Farm and
Casey Tract (which will be combined into one project for construction purposes) and the Ballance
Farm. As you can see, construction activitles for all throe sites should commence in 1997, with
planting being complete by May 1998.'You will, of course, be invited to participate in progress
meetings on these projects, as well as site visits.
Incidently, the construction contract for this R-2228A and R-2228BA includes a provision
prohibiting mechanized land clearing in wetlands outside the toe of the slope.
Attachments (2)
oa: Robin Little
Mike Smith
€0d 9LS4
ON -131 NOdInNd dNU DNINNt:?1d:QI 61=:ST"I8i- - W
y ,
i
i
l r•?I ? i i i •: i
w
a-..---
1 E
r f 1 1 1
I
a.......IH,.n.,..
i
:
• ...„r.r•••+,a.u•ruw111.,.r.,1)•rr11...9
:•i •1? .w..a......
•?i 1 i . -. l ................ ... I i •..• y ... -.- ...
i i
*MEN
.•.•,....± ..... ....... .
• ^ -.......T ..................'?..•... .}.r.n .pl fy1.-,.u•, ?•,.r-.... ?.•uur......... 4 _
• • ! • 1 '
'.' r• ••. ...u.ur........i.••n....;•.•u.ur„Yrwu4r.-.••••L1 r.._...'...•••.. e...
• t ; ' 1 ?' ........ru.rQl,.u•„,•,... •.•.n•... _-....r....
1 i
R ' I FII i
• ......... ,... .... n .... I .... y?
!
:
r! I ... fX
. c l ! 1 : ? 1 1
w
14
"'? a
m N ?? a
r c
.a M a a a .`? 4
N P! V We
11
rod 9ZS# :ON -81 NOdInN3 QNd ONINNU"ld:QI 0b:ST Idd 96,-20-A44-
44
r
now
iw ... , ' _ ... . i.. u.... .?......-. e........,i. ,,...«...;u...u.,
?' ....._.i._......j...,...llr..ll.l..?i.... j 1, ..j...,n.,.?.. .,j... ...i.... .. '......,..:_....._
.r •,. ?.N 1
tfx1? . t . . i
.IIrItIt1%Illrrrn,:1.111tln.nrr,nnr•rrr•••••.••• ••. - ? . : ,•
r . i 1
1_... r_.. I ... FYV?I
i .
. • . 1 i r i 1........ .1N...nnl••lll....1. r...»j.._.. r- t.
? C r = i i 1 i _ ? 3 i
.1;11
?7 :. i.........i..,-.....t .............. _ .- i .......
.
e r 1 i.-....... •.._... .nY1N.IMn.?nn Yl.lin.n.n.
yr?? !
I i ? j { 4
y .r
!6 r •, r . 1
i .i._......i,.rry.. ... . .. i......-. ?........j......_.i._....
7? fY•lr I I raw M ................
i
1 I
......_.F.,...,,e,1. .;'...............11'x•.1.1.. 1... ..il. .. j... i
l!IIYYYY11??
i
wrl? <b ... .. !
• i i ' 1
M 1? e t .. ; ... ... j.._......
• . Ii11111•rr.i...??I. f??.r.rrn ..... i......... i.. .u . -?e.,?-... i
Sj
1
. ? ? 1 i 1 i i i .. • i i
$?Q C
,o
V yr
1 ?
+; g C
Is A
y
CL
Y fL w N n b rb N m d1 40. w Y w ,
Sod 9LS4 :ON X31 NDd I nN3 GNU 9N I NNU-1d : Q I T b : ST I dJ 96 , -20-J.dW
17111196

0
?Lq
VIRGINIA
PROJECT-
r
i

c
G
158
.,

c0lwmR
VICINITY MAP SHOWING LOCATION OF
STATE PROJECT 6.049009T

DIVISION 01F 1HIG11-11WAIS
Co"URRITUCIC C30UNTY
LOCATION: CASEY TRACT NORTHEAST OF THE INTERSECTION
OF NC 34 AND NC 168 AT SLIGO
T;V'PE OF WORK: GRADING, CLEARING & GRUBBING
MOWING & DISKING, AND EROSION CONTROL
1 L...-
?1 , 111:
COWELLS CR EEI? f l -' .\
DUCKSI(

n rs n n reaxT eercuxa xa ? nrt t ?rni.
_ _ uu el Rn]
N C IZ _2228WM
Hare ena.xn I.AIRa.xo. x'TMN
6.0490091 --
So'c Sl1x;l I-A (or Indox of Sl?ch,?
See St of 1-© For Convenlional Syn7bo1.
w I s TO COINJOCK
CASEY ?T C,[
TO MOYOCIC
SLIG®( f ?68
'
l
C l68' /.
L
-
GRAPHIC SCALES
50 25 0 50 100
PLANS
PRomc.r AREA
APPROXIMATELY 6+1- ACRES
FOR WETLAND MITIGATION
Prepared In ffc orrice or:
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
1995 STANDARD SPECIrIGA770N5 ?-
RIGHT OF WAY DATE. SUE FLOWERS
w? PROJECT ENGimirm
LETTING DATE LEE MCCRORY _
-M9?199.7 PROJE47 DESIGN ENGINERR
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
srrwflvxa: _ _ _
ROADWAY DESIGN
PA
SIGNATURE.

----------------------------------
I PRELIMINARY PLANS
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
DIVISION OF IIIGIII17AYS
STATE OF NORM CAROLINA
_ _ icrt
STAIR 111GNIVAS_ENGMITIC DESIGN _
DEPARTMENT 01' TRANSPORTATION
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
DI o-N ADAIINISnUTOR DA7EJJ
4 -SEP-1936 07:71
ISh
STATE, 01F NOlIt"IFT1 (CAIR011,111NA
]DIVISION (Olt' ITIG11-11WAYS
ROADS & RELATED ITEMS
Edge of Pavement .. _ _......._ -__---
Curb .- ...._ _......... ........ .
Prop. Slope Stakes Cut .--.........._ ............................... - -.- -
Prop. Slope Stakes Fill .. _.. r
Prop. Woven Wire Fence ....... ___E??_
Prop. Chain Link Fence ....... _E1 El
Prop. Barbed Wire Fence ...................... 0-
Prop. Wheelchair Ramp _ ... ......................
Exist. Guardrail _._........
Prop. Guardrail
Equality Symbol _._ ........ ....
Pavement Removal ---- .. _ .. ....... ..... . ............
CONVENTIONAL S"Y"MBOLS
MINOR
Head & End Wall ....... ...... .... ....... .___.........--------- CON/ „W\
Pipe Culvert .......
Footbridge...--.._ .. ...... _.... .... }------------{
Drainage Boxes. ...... ..... ...... ............. ............... 1:1 CB
Paved Ditch Gutter ..------------------------------ .-....-......... ---------
UTILITIES
Exist. Polo ...... .
Exist. Power Pole
Prop. Power P-1-
._- ..
f'. ... _ .......... ........
Exist Telephone Pole
RIGHT OF WAY
Right of Way Marker .._ .....................- --- -- .... .... .......... .
Exist. Right of Way Line NY/Marker .......
-
.
Prop. Right of Way Line
(Iron Pin & Cap, By Others)
Prop. Right of Way Line
(Standard Concrete Marker Set By Contract)..
Exist. Control of Access Line ,A)
Prop. Control of Access Line .............. _- ... _... (B
Exist. Easement Line ------ _ - _..__...._. _ . -E_------
Prop. Temp. Construction Easement Line ........... E
Prop. Temp. Drainage Easement Line .................. -TOE-
Prop. Perm. Drainage Easement line ....... ......... . POE_-
- ------- --- ---- -----------
Prop. Telephone Pole
Exist. Joint Use Pole
Prop. Joint Use Pole ........... ....... ...
Telephone Pedestal ......... ._....._..._ _ -._... _..
Cable TV Pedestal ---------- ---- ---------- .....__...__.._._.
Hydrant . _._.. .._ ...... ............. .__._
Satellite Dish
Exist. Water Valve .._.... ___......_................
Sewer Clean Out
Power Manhole ...... .........
.-
Telephone Booth --------- --_------- ._ ._.....
Water Manhole ------------------ _.. .. ...... .__............
Light Pole .............. ------------- .
HYDROLOGY H-Frame Pole -------------------- ---.... ........
Stream or Body of Water .._ Power Line Tower
Flow Arrow _ ..... ......... _. _...? Pole with Base
Disappearing Stream...... . ............... ............. ?..._ Gas Valve ......_. -------- .......... .... ..__....... .....................
Spring .. _.. - . ..............__... . ......... _. .? Gas Meter ......_.
Swamp Marsh,-..,. ......... .._........ .. -.-...._. Telephone Manhole ----- ------------------------------- _.__..__....
Shoreline .......... ..... __..... ------- _ -------- --- _..---- -------------- Power Transformer . ........
Falls, Rapids ,._,_ _ _ _ . . __ .._....... -.. ?..._ Sanitary Sewer Manhole .. ....._.
............
Prop Lateral, Tail, Head Ditches ......-
- - - ??? Storm Sewer Manhol
STR UCTURES
MAJOR
and End Wall ------------- e....... ..._._...
Bridge, Tunnel, or Box Culvert
Bridge Wing Wall, Head Wall
<-- raw
Tank; Water, Gas, Oil _.-........ ._ ..... .......................
...
Water Tank With Legs .... .... ....... __...... ..... __..
_--------- ........ L_ _CONC-_J Traffic Signal Junction Box .... .......... __..............-_..
)covc ww( Fiber Optic Splice Box ..............................................
......... ..... Television or Radio Tower ............ ........ .
................
b
-e-
-o-
-b-
0
b
0
0
rJ
0
e--e
z
0
0
0
C>
0
0
0
D
Utility Power Line Connects to Traffic Signal
Lines Cut Into the Pavement _-TS --TS---
Water Line .------- ----- ._........... __.. __._...... --W___„--
Sanitary Sewer .......... ._... .....
Sewer Force Main ---FSS -FSS ----
Gas Line
Storm Sewer... --s-s----
Power Line
Telephone Cable -T ----T
UG Telephone Conduit --.TG -TG
Unknown Utility -TOn 7OTE--
Television Cable --TV---TV----
Fiber Optics Cable FO---FO-
Exist. Water Meter 0
Drawn According to LkG Records.. oATUR
Abandoned According to WG Records AATOR
End Of Information .__..... E.O.I.
BOUNDARIES & PROPERTIES
State Line -___--
County Line --___---
Township Line -------.__._--
City Line _-. _ -1 -- -- -

.
Reservation Line _............
---___-.-
Property Line
Property Line Symbol ..... -__.... _ f'E
Exist. Iron Pin 0
E
Property Corner +
Property Monument _....
M
EC
Property Number ..._.. -.- IP
Parcel Number (CID
Fence Line ----------------------------- ..... .... ....._.... ... x --x
WW & ISBW
Existing Wetland Boundaries ------------- ..... _..__....__. ._-.__WCB--..--
CoastalMarsh Boundaries ------------- _._ .... ...... .... _ __cMO---
Proposed Wetland Boundaries ..__ __._ .....---- WEB_ __--
Existing Endangered Animal Boundaries -...... .... EAO --
Existing Endangered Plant Boundaries ----- ............ _ _- EPB
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
R-2226 M 1D
BUILDINGS & OTHER CULTURE
Buildings 9::?D
Foundations
Area Outline
Gate
Gas Pump Vent or WG Tank Cap .. ... ...
Church ... .......
School _
Park _ -----
Cemetery. r- t -
Dam -
Sign o
Well o
Small Mine - .. ....
_ x
Swimming Pool
TOPOGRAPHY
Loose Surface
Hard Surface -._--
Change in Road Surface _.-...-
Curb -
Right of Way Symbol Riw
Guard Post .. .... _ 0u,
Paved Walk
Bridge _ -(
Box Culvert or Tunnel ---------- -
------------ -----
Ferry ------ _
Culvert _ _. ...... ,._
Footbridge ._ ........ .......
Trail, Footpath _
Light House v4v
Single Tree
Single Shrub
Hedge
Woods Line.
Orchard
Vineyard
PEGETATION
0 0 C? C?
"'- - VINEYARD
RAILROADS
Standard Gauge- $1
rsx rnraswnmrox
RR Signal Milepost o
."Emsr f5
Switch
n
rMs'l
4-SEP-1996 01: 32
Ic?q.?1v,r Y,-p A,?,,,?„-AVJr.?•m. p ;h
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SHEET NO.
R-2228Wtd 2
ROADWAY DESIGN IIYDRAULICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
E LINE
' MIN. D
NATURAL GROUND
VARIABLE.SLOPE
AND DISTANCE
SEE X-SECTIONS
-ELEV. 2.0
SURVEY LINE
14'
, I ,I
ELEV. 0.4
ELEV. -0.3
*LIMITS OF
STAGING ING AREA
OR
** TOE OF FILL SLOPE
R-2228A CONSTRUCITON
MATCH FILL SLOPE
E
14'aVARIABLE.SLOP
AND DISTANCE **vP,-.-
SEE X-SECTIONS
,20 ELEV. 0.4-__ j' *NATURAL GROUND
-- -- - --------
ELEV. 2.0-'
TYPICAL CHANNEL SECTION
USE TYPICAL CHANNEL SECTION FROM
STA. 10+00 TO 22+62+l-
TRIBUTARY
FINISH GRADE FROM FINISH GRADE FROM
PROPOSED CHANNEL VAR.?? VAR. t? PROPOSED CHANNEL
VAR. ELEV.-VAR. ELEV.
ELEV. -0.3
TYPICAL TRIBUTARY SECTION
USE TYPICAL TRIBUTARY SECTION AT
VARIOUS LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON PLANS
FINISHED._ GRADE
A ______ --. _....__
FTER CHANNEL EXCAVATION
_ VAR. SLOPE
3:1 SEE X SECTIONS
LIMITS_.OF THIBUTARy ?. ___...._ TO CHANNEL-?
AS SHOWN ON PLANS 0% GRADE
(-0.3 EL.)
DETAIL OF TRIBUTARY GRADE
,PRBIAM1NA1t'Y PLANS
W NOT ,NN FOR IYINITItI:I'IIUN
13-NOV-1996 10:42

SHEARPOTNT DIAGRAM
PROJECT REVERENCE NO. Sill I- I NO.
_ R-2228WM 3-A
ROADWAY DESIGN NYDRAIJLICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
Ac,
4-
? ?\ Ch,Ffk
? Y
' \4:r\ -CMg\ I? ? L?, ? ? CMe` ?? .v,J? (V vs 2))_,r ?\
\ ?1tr srv1?
C
UIYJ / !0 IN( ????h ? Cl?1-)- 5
4111 0),
\ <' ?? I Z - C1dR w i rr y r t ' J J)
(i: ( LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION e 7}Lm n r vx n - IV D "IZ.Iro Tt(' c ?, 1
Jf ', - rr
-_-CMtl' ?.V1LG ??
-cm
`` PCCSia. 16.77.69
.. C?.1 Lr ? a >,.tir l{/J,art-IJ.UrAI rJJ?"tlti,.,Ir ?1'?1,?. ..v?:.I D, r'?lA??.a, tl, ?Art.l,.a J't.I 1 I? )J
t
PCCSto: l5 4931
--------- ---- j
------
,\V..? -\ \\\ f Ir/ __-__-\\\ ?jAJ-J.i'IJ,.,•I_AIJ_^n.Jr
1
o C h I l
Co
?( z I p I A
0 C ova ',
v ?T?, ?; I_ r ,Y7i? vrl'L1?4r Yt-n'v? I
OF CONSTRUCTION
j 14'00 -?-8 9 19.Od"t?• ?.':
7 0 Il' ??\ I ?;
I P , to. 13.5120
19.50
1 2 ?? 1 ?i
UMItS OF CONSTRUCTION m-71 13'5 Q } I ;END Cr(ANNEL h 'te r
/ I n _ 2p'Op I SIG. 2223 - 1
k__ 1211 / su ' - - I LREV J51o.449.84.14
ERRS o, '22.58 1 71.88' (tTl '
N.I.:41G-, 35.0 .21-62.10
L i
= 3'71W n' :I. c m, 1 to. 12,4961 L
uc _ 021 '00" I 2050 1 vul_
ro I ?' 6
R - li4E 11,1 0 5? I © ) {?i?
J BEGIN C?IA41L I ©
1 = UI)I9, ,J I Q3 I ?lA.11„ N :I O rJ3. I,fll ?.?' tId -'?.? '`Y
a 1 o I '
Sta. /01001-00
0.03 r I!I I I 12'00 10'
MNNTAIN EXISTING
-LREV- Std 450.2?J1
8338' (RTX I _ ELEVATION WITHIN 1 N 4' 42•
1 ?? 1 o PCStp?10.90.00 I LIMITS Of N 8 n(i° ,r T ??
\ ?? I o so O9 STAGING ARfA n ,lG
r'
?i u v v l v j S 88'45 536E ll _ 41 p't
18' NO'
1:y1 u,
I'll PIT
_a '_-RAW- DI
?. iR icP s RLI GI( w 4.J1
O 1
U01 Wl '? (D
15' RCP O
N 10 k-n
t --
I -- -- 111_ v X155
_ .? 111 s' -
to
\ - --.._.. _.--------? •'„ ,
CURVE DATA FOR\'CHANNEL r
P/ Sto 12-25.12\ P! Sta 14-89.96 PI SIo 1614.03 P! SIo' ?9,33.7?? 4 PI Sto 21.58!4
12T 55' 59.8' (LT) D • 103' 1!' 23.7' (RT) n 18' 22' 58.7' (RTA 1, p • 10!) 41' 462" (RT) Z 122'05'32.8(LT)
D • 76 23' 397' D • 52'05' 13.5' D 14'19'269 ;'.D 1'49' 513' D 76'23' 39.8'
L • 159.61' L • 198.11' L 12834' L :33 44.99' L • 159.82' ----------------------------------
T • 135J2' T • 138.76' T • 6472' T • 256JO' T • 135.56' 1 PRELIMINARY PLANS
R • 75.00' R • 110.00' R • 400.00' R • 180.00' R 75.00' ; Do NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
.....................................
---A-SEP-1996 07: 30
_-? ----_. ___.....:rrr,Jy/.
,., w.aCCnse/; ns?ty,530
y, )
Marl', (?? 4d
BUCKSKIN CRLEK
1 r

?'?:[ \ Ctir{? I ? .
S
4`? u
(
\i\
:(r
\. }
(e, )h?rri
rip t J
) yr ?? ? (C ?'-y? ? y.
j ? _ ?'by? ( ley ry
l C)\ 1 Y /`
L ? rr?s Z Me\ ?(
fl.
\ Jyy?'p_rf'rr
cl ((.
/-_WLO-?-_. i
-y- C
((\v - OIY,J ?/ ?9 lyia 2 ?r
r?
t?rti ??
t r
S
4 a
?? c

1
uMlrs OF CONSTRUCTION .?r? ??, y ?1?LM'(7 YY 1 1 ! Y v 1 I )ll Y r"1'1: ITV^ (( ?

C? -06„10- --
PCCSta.16.77,64 WLU._
1-403
1
11
PROJECT REFERENCE NO.
_ R-2.226VM -
ROADWAY DESIGN
ENGINEER
I.
SHUT NO.
HYDRAULICS
ENGINEER
7rULK??N
IL
\ /- - __ 7..,11/ \ \
X11. ,
i
PC-- l-4931 Z{A
?YI4 - __ __ __.--__-_----
(. cl
..?? \ ?rv ? / i ? ?v I rC OIM -?
I ,.
I I - U6+3S 01
= 3512'21' 1? 1.
Ul. 07 -15'() 0'
I = u6? ro
I, = Ii1L 1r91'
807.93,
e = 0.05 F r/rI
jJJJ(((
\ `r \ r I r-uc LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
l ( 1 ` ?(i, IATA_(,_
3 I -PROPOSED fU NJN EL PROPOSED TRTARIES )' 1
l I PCSta,13.51.20
UMIOF CONSTRUCTION- r-1 CIfANNCI
/ I ?,,? ? =-?? ?"?--_-? 7 I S.to 225223 • / I,,a ' - - ?-
L' I c - I LREV to. 449-84J4 ( I PRC$W: 258 r? ?J I 71.88' (IRT)
PSto, 21,e2.<0
W
m I PTSto.12-49.61
C? BEGIN CRANNL
ta.1000 MAINN?AIN ?X15TING
I ?( -LREV- Sio, 456.2 JI (' J \ J ELEVATION WITHIN I \ 84' 124 ' r
8338 fRT)\y I PCSta.10.90.00? I LIMITS OF N T
)I
T
STAGING AREA
I
r
1 r
'c-, irUNJ," l S-8895'53b'E_
R' RGr
18* Rcll
24' Ul 15' Rcp
Y? `-
?.-Yi Illll L11 _Il {. -f?f11 T -.?..
41i0 --
11 C I
1 JJ_.J- 1. l 1.-LL 1-1-:._1-.J. J 1' 1 t rt {l S'R6R
?- .-__.,I l -------- -- _ _I_ - _
CI7 74'111.1' '-_-' Itl'RI,P
CURVE DATA FOR CHANNEL
PI Sla 12'25.12
A • 12f 55' 59.8' (LT)
D • 76' 23' 39.7'
L • 159.61'
T • 135.12'
R 75.00'
Pt Sto 14'89.96
A • 103' 11' 23.7" (RT)
D 52' 05' 135'
L • 198.11'
T 138.76'
R II0.00'
PI Sta 16'14.03
p • 18' 22' 58.7" (RT)
D 14' 19' 26.6'
L 128.34'
T 64.72'
R 400.00'
PI Sta 19'33.74
A • 109'47' 46.2 (RT)
D 31' 49'51.3'
L 344,94'
T • 256JO'
R 180.00'
PI Sta 21'58.14
• 122' 05' 32.8" (LT)
D 76'25'39.8'
L 159.82'
T • 13556'
R • 75.00'
-----------------------------------
I PRELIMINARY PLANS
1 DO NOT USE fOR CONSTRUCTION
29-ULI-1996 09120
/usr/rdv/r2228Wm/C,3'
f I owors) ..............
_ ..................... ...............
0

a
c
L
U
N
0
U
E
MI
:YV
,JN
p? N
TLS
1L?
P7
P\

n
c
c
u
a
v
0
u
E
0
V
V
V
o`y
a
?1.

CT.
0
r?
-?
168 CP

"AT
r?l
Y'r
---- -1?!CIGS - - ---- TO COIIVJO
ro©
ld
d?
VIRGINIA 615
. 21, 60y0CK wry 1 /?
172; 't.. 1221 222
\.1215 716 211
i21 ?
\ 11,1"1715
\ 166
•, 1702 SLI00
\ 1202 1210
PROJECT. 34
`/ -
158
C6 "PiD,
? Gc?
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DIVISION CHIC 11-1111GI[=11WAIVS
E03"UTR RITUCA.r t?Gg11Y7CY
LOCATION: TUCKER TRACT APPROXIMATELY 0.66 MILES NORTHEAST
OF THE INTERSECTION OF NC 34 AND NC 168 NEAR SLIGO
TYPE OF WORK: GRADING, (CLEARING & GRUBBING
MOWING & DISKING, AND EROSION CONTROL
COADOCK

VICINITY ADIP SIi0F11711IG LOCATION OF
STATE PROJECT 6.049009T
GRAPHIC SCALES
50 25 0 50 100
PLANS
1h5 C E! 10 20
PROFILES(VERT.)
50 25 0 50 100
PROFILES(HORL)
PROJECT AREA
APPROXIMATELY 68.25+1- ACRES
FOR WETLAND MITIGATION
,I.TR Sr.T. !.dell R.. --I- Na I aT extAAl6 -.
-22C R28WM X
er.Te r.a,xa RAVRa.xa 6Rnx.imuu
6.049009T N E
Sec Slw:, I A for Index of S/xlels
Sec S/ac/ I - 8 For Conventional Symbols
---------------------
I PRELIMINARY PLANS
1 DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
DIVISION OF 111G)IM417S
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
HYDRAULICS ENGINEER
Prepared In me OrrIce or:
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
199S STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS
rE.
RIGHT OF WAY DATE. SUE FLOWERS
- FROJEGi MGMFrx ROADWAY DESIGN
LETTING DATE: LEE McCRORY
-,AY]L A V -1?? rilomcT DESIGN ENGINEER
LT PA
SSIGNAMM
STA7E MGlll{AY ENGINEER - DESIGN
DEPARTMENT OF TRANS11ORTA710N
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION
29-OCT-1996 00:23
/usr/r dy/r2226wrn/tucker/ Wcher. Ish
*S.U.E = SUBSURFACE UTILITY ENGINEER
ROADS & RELATED ITEMS
Edge of Pavement ........ ....... _ ...... ...........
-----
Curb .......... _._ ............. ... __._..._._ ............
Prop. Slope Stakes Cut _....
Prop. Slope Stakes Fill F
Prop. Woven Wire Fence -e -o-
Prop. Chain Link Fence ........... .._ ,_...... ..... -B 0--
Prop. Barbed Wire Fence _..... _...-_...... ......
-?-_
Prop. Wheelchair Ramp ._.... ....__ ... ....... _. c
Exist. Guardrail _ _..... __ _.` --
Prop. Guardrail __ _._.. -......
Equality Symbol ............ .__.....
_.....
.
Pavement Removal
RIGHT OI' WAY
Right of Way Marker ......
Exist. Right of Way Line w/Marlcer ._... -.-----
Prop. Right of Way Line
(Iron Pin & Cap, By Others) -
Prop. Right of Way Line
(Standard Concrete Marker Set By Contract).. -___-
Exist. Control of Access Line ...... ------
-` 1,.
Prop. Control of Access Line . __ ......_
Exist. Easement Line --- __ _ E-----_.
Prop. Temp. Construction Easement Line ........ E_.
Prop. Temp. Drainage Easement Line _TUE
Prop. Perm. Drainage Easement Line -_-POE
HYDROLOGY
Stream or Body of Water ....._ _ ...._._......... Flow Arrow .............. .......... . ._ ........ ... -- .... -...-...-3
Disappearing Stream --
Spring ...... ._.
Swamp Marsh. ..
Shoreline __.. --------------
Falls, Rapids., _ ..... .. _.-... ?_ _..._
Prop Lateral, Tail, Head Ditches ..... ..... ._ _.....
F- ruv
STRUCTURES
MAJOR
Bridge, Tunnel, or box Culvert ..- _- r---CONC --- I
Bridge Wing Wall, Head Wall
and End Wall ............. ----- )CONC WW(
STA"1C'1G 0111 NOIR"1['111[ l(_'AI 0II_ [N./k
ID11V1[SIOIN 101[4 11111(31[1[WAYS
(t..)NIVIENTIO'NAL zS`YMB(DX!z')
MINOR
Head & End Wall _ ....... ............ coN,,
Pipe Culvert ..... ....... ? _ _
Footbridge... ................-......_-.........__.................__.............- >-------------<
Drainage Boxes_..-------- -------- El cn
Paved Ditch Gutter -----_-__--
UTILHIES
Exist. Polo .............. ....... .----- -_...
Exist. Power Pole _ ...... . l
Prop. Power Pole
Exist. Telephone Pole ........
.-
Prop. Telephone Pole __.... . _.... .__...._ -0-
Exist. Joint Use Pole .._....... .... ._ -------------------- ... .__. -b-
Prop. Joint Use Pole _ _.......___. ..... ....... ._.. . -d-
Telephone Pedestal ..... _------- _.__-.... El
Cable TV Pedestal _ ------- EQ
Hydrant ._...__....... _.. .. {
Satellite Dish
Exist. Water Valve _ .....
Sewer Clean Out ...... __ ..
Power Manhole . _.....
Telephone Booth ... . . ........ . .._ m
Water Manhole ............ ._ __....... ..__ W
Light Pole a
H-Frame Pole . _.. _._......_ _ .... s-?
Power Line Tower ._ . ___. _
Pole with Base - . p
Gas Valve
Gas Meter.
Telephone Manhole..
Power Transformer ..__...... ..__.-......... _ _ .... E
Sanitary Sewer Manhole ...... _.._ ........
Storm Sewer Manhole.__ _...... ._.. Qs
Tank; Water, Gas, Oil ._....- _.-. _ .._ ...... ._._ 0
Water Tank With Legs ------ .. ___
Traffic Signal Junction Box ........... CS]
Fiber Optic Splice Box .............. __ .... ...... FF1
Television or Radio Tower _--------------------- ---- ---- ._ 0
Utility Power Line Connects to Traffic
Signal Lines Cut Into the Pavement. --....... -S-
Recorded Water Line ----.w-.--W---
Designated Water Line (S.U.E.*)
Sanitary Sewer --ss---ss----
Recorded Sanitary Sewer Force Main FSS ---FSS ----
Designated Sanitary Sewer Force Main(S.U.E.*) ..-FSS- -FSs
Recorded Gas Line c----c--
Designated Gas Line (S.U.E.*) -O_ _O -
Storm Sewer. --5--
Recorded Power Line P P -
Designated Power Line (S.U.E.*) P-- --P- -
Recorded Telephone Cable T----- T
Designated Telephone Cable (S.U.E.*) _T- __T_- .
Recorded UVIG Telephone Conduit __.T{__-TC-_
Designated LPG Telephone Conduit (S.U.E.*) __Tl___TC_ _
Unknown Utility (S.U.E.*) -?UT aun.-
Recorded Television Cable --TV---- TV --
Designated Television Cable (S.U.E.*) [V-- --TV_ ..
Recorded Fiber Optics Cable _FO----FO---
Designated Fiber Optics Cable (S.U.E.*) ro -ro-
Exist. Water Meter _ 0
LPG Test Hole (S.U.E.*) (2)
Abandoned According to WG Record ATTUR
End of Information F.O.I.
BOUNDARZIES & PROPERTIES
State Line - -------
County Line
Township Line --_-_---___--
City Line
Reservation Line
Property Line --
Property Line Symbol
Exist. Iron Pin
EIP
Properly Corner i-
Property Monument EcM
Property Number X23
Parcel Number `J
Fence Line x - Y_ _x -
WW 4 ISBW
Existing Wetland Boundaries _...... _.._WI.I,.__--._
Proposed Wetland Boundaries .__._------- ._------ _.. WLo__--
Existing Endangered Animal Boundaries..--..--.. Enu-.._
Existing Endangered Plant Boundaries __ ------ Ep,T
PROJECT REFERENCr. N0. SAFEI NO.
R-222NR'M - -- 111
BUILDINGS & OTHER CULTURE
Buildings ....__._ _.._ .............
............................... .

........... -
Foundations .....
L, ;
Area Outline -
Gate Nix
Gas Pump Vent or U/G Tank Cap
Church _
School LJ
Park .. ---,
Cemetery
t -. _I
Dam
Sign
Well o
Small Mine - XI
Swimming Pool - -- - l%i'I
TOPOGRA13IIY
Loose Surface
Hard Surface
Change in Road Surface ......
Curb - -
Right of Way Symbol
Guard Post
Paved Walk
Bridge
Box Culvert or Tunnel
Ferry
Culvert
Footbridge ....
Trail, Footpath
Light House
Single Tree
Single Shrub
Hedge
Woods Line
Orchard
Vineyard

VEGETATION

p
.. ............. .. VINE. AFW -
RAILROADS - -
Standard Gauge - --- - 1-1-T-1-1 -1-1-1-
rsx rnMSMIUA W
RR Signal Milepost o
Switch - C7
/usr/rd /r2PP8wM/tuok01-/1ym.Pah
F I owars I ..-.-.......
R/W
rl q
'
•
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. I SHEET NO.
Y DESIGN HYDRAULICS
INEER ENGINEER
NI
GRADF. TO
EL. 1.3
SURVEY LINE
ROAD
SURVEY LINE
BERM
/--NATURAL GROUND
t/-----------
mAue ? ELEVATION PER PLAN OR 0.5'MIN.
POINT WHICHEVER IS GREATER
I
-...---------
3;\
GRADE TO
DITCH EL. 1.3
COMPACTED FILL
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 3
10+00 TO 20+00
ELEVATION PER PLAN OR 1'MIN
WHICHEVER IS GREATER
NATURAL GROUND--N
\ --------- --------- --
GRADE TO ...
EL. 1.3
NATURAL GROUND--\
SURVEY LINE
ROAD
02
TYPICAL SECTION-_NO__2_
17+00 TO iiB - COMPACTED FILL
Air 'o
ELEVATION PI7R PLAN OR 0.5'MIN.
WHICHEVER IS GREATER
I/
31
GRADE TO
EL. 1.3
COMPACTED FILL
_TYPICAL _SECTION - NO. 4
20+50 TO 27+50
FILL EXISTING DITCHES
AT LOCATIONS SHOWN ON PLANS
GRADE TO ELEV. 1.30
TYPICAL SECTION NO. 5
------------ --j_
1'Pa10,1.1IN All, 111-ALNS
_DD Nwr USE FOR CONgrgprTION
29-OCT-1995 09!23
/Ysr/rdy/r2228wm/tuckor/IDcVcr,tyP
TYPICAL SECTION NO.
- 10+50 TO_10+75 (+/--) - -
SURVEY LINE
BERM
DETAIL OF DITCH BLOCK
?B
D1 = 5'
D2=3'
A EXISTING DITCH
---------------- A
--- --- -- '•--:_• _'.:._•.'.:;. _ ------------------`,, PROPOSED GRADE ELEVATION
1. •. ; : ?' r' - - - - - - -- EXISTING DITCH BOTTOM
:: • < ---
------------- r-,-;-.. - ------ ------------------------------
--------------------
.CLAY.•OR •BEN1`QNITE
MIX, P1 LiG__.
/ SECTION A-A
DITCH BLOCK / B DITCH BLOCK-/
PLAN VIEW OF EXISTING
DITCH WITH DITCH BLOCK
i
DITCH BLOCK'

SECTION B-B
D1 DENOTES LOCATIONS OF CENTRAL DITCH BLO(`KS
D2 DENOTES LOCATIONS OF FEEDER DITCH BLOCKS
Lw__ = 25'---- EXISTING DITCFL oc------.. D1 = 25'
D2 = 10' WIDTH D2 = 10'
PROJECT REFERENCE NO. SIII:ET 140.
R-2228 WM z = A
ROADWAY DESIGN HYDRAULIC,
ENGINEE ENGINEER
FIXELiMiN.A.RY d'1.,.,1NS
nn lour ucr, rmt ronxrrcrno?
29-OCT-1996 08:23
/usr/rdY/r2228.u/fucker/Iuc),^r.Ijp
f Inwnrs.
1 --
WIDI)
M ON PROJECT REFERENCE

__
NO. _IIEE 140.

T
. -..-----. _.-------.. ....__._._. __.. _.__._ _-.. _.._.__ _. ..-. __.. _..
_.. .. __._--'• ROADWAY O
SIUN S
N
I - -- -- -- -- .
JJ
J - __
_ - ----------_- ----- ---- ENGINEER NELR
ENCI
4 ?4.QL-1,V-?
?aL2iO
c POT Sta 10'00.00 ROAD
l
l
V 1
1
-l
^,
-..--.. ., _.-_....
-.....
_ .. .-.. . t,?
_ }l ut•IJIJ.?I.U.J,.,._Al 'll,,y-AI L.LJ..A-IfZAJ l.A
M.U:'I:I; i.is.U-c.A.l.l-V`V:T.!.;v'U,/l.??lt
- _.? .__ -. _.._1:J .
,tA
.
A 1 AA
?, Il
1,.A JJ
l• 4.l/. 1,
:J..A, U: •:A'' l,?,)a?:1;J,A?V -!.LV
1, ._,iA_l!I.AN.-1j-Ll
-

2ti 50.6`W_....I IIOUIL 11,11 _1 VARYINI, R/W

-----------------------------------
NC 168 13s)
- --- -- - - - -
I / -
- - -- -_- _. -_-- _ - _. - -:. - PCSto. 20'16.39 06 16
I RA I 1 °?) I.nl1-111 1, mwl?. rr v _rr .tiyi _ _ _ w 1 1 l IS ._. os,.L 1 M! I - 20
L_
PTSIG. 20.32.09
C
s i I ?_-----_ __=---- f ----
- - ------------N 8----.4 E-------- 10H j qQ ?cl
P,; ? C ,? I I j aI ilwY IA/w LINt: 4.. j -
1 PROPOSED BERM GAADINO LIMITS-
POI- SIC,t 0100,00 ESE M I I fl I I I`-FO
:j
84 j l j I I I i I I I Il
I
L--PROPOSED ACCESS HO ? 1 f4
SEE TYPICAL NO. 1 I I 1 .,
ANLi I IPON I 02
?. -x 14, ?uN LINr
}? 1 ?? ?, I-t DI I }I r i
PROPOSE DITCH BLOCKS
SEE SHEEP 2-A FOR BLOCK DETAILS I I .• I, 1•,
.1
_?11
q
I }?
l
IA -
J-lA e.? ')
J
3
'v
4} i
"I'll iY ',
I/
1.
Ulf <
i ?
i
I'
1.
j
-o_(
U
r
I
I
1_t'7 I
? I
?'? 'X= I
Ad' C
i
I- I I C K I IZ, W. L--1 AI
D.L. "?y C. l h
2' BASE DITCH-
SEE TYPICAL NO. 1
z
I
I
TIE PROPOSED CHANNEL
TO EXISTING DITCH
N8414'391 490.00: P/L C/I Oli6
I
I?
• IQ
m
I?
I?
I—GRADING
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
? I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
PCSfa. 16,
/ r
QO S 84'14'37.9W -_--50'R /
j /
----------------------
PCStP.19-84.00 PTSlo.I7.56.71 -
e-50 R
20.60.07
I
I
I
i
N'- PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD
! SEE TYPICAL 0. 2 i
I
P?
I.
?I D2
D1
a
GRADING LIMITS -?
I
FILL EXISTING

I {I ? icr
I
GRADING uMns_-? I
I I Ij
GRADE TO ELEV TION 1.3? '
I I I

D2 I'
D2

i? D2
0- 17M' D2 1

I?-------
-----I-- -FILL EXISTING DI J7 VI ?
1N
I
--
'
B
M- I
?
PROPOSED
ER i
I
I I
I i
f I I
I I

I
I.
it
I J
1

'A'
I '
I I
>
I I?IiUMSI-Y, NlJ „Ill
I ? I N1?.I J, )Oo III!. ':?L)

I,
i
I
II
?'I Pl/f
I I

D2 I
I
I
I' 11
1
GfCl D2 1 C'ID2
- jGOADING LIMITS -?
Frt6 nr:PA+
POT fq_26.28.63
a1 643 ----
-
31 13 - FILL EXISTING DITCH Ill
6G`24113' E 1
i? _-_-----___ I FUTURE MITIGATION '
r GRADE TO ` I r
ELEVATION 1.6 ) i LEGEND
qI? \ D1 - DENOTES LOCATIONS OF CENTRAL DITCH BLOCKS
I" D2 - DENOTES LOCATIONS OF FEEDER DITCH BLOCKS [ j r]
ill L1 1
APPROXIMATE GRADING LIMITS - (SEE SHEET 2-A FOR DETAIL OF DITCH BLOCKS)
I ?I ! I ------ ---- i ? 1
i
I
It h--GRADING LIMITS
FOR PROFILE OF "ROAD" SEE SKEET 6
MATCHLINE SEE SHEET 5
FOR PROFILE OF "BERM" SEE SHEET 7 ------ -- - - - -- --
G?lf+?:d?I,L?'G [h+1h?1(g`}1Y PILA.INS,
VU NO]' VNP, COM1'8'I'R)'1"PION
- -- --- -_..29 ?OCT-199608:24
.. _ _--?_--.-_--_-. ._ _ -- ----. - /usr/rdy/r2228wm/tucker/ fucker .s
----------------- --- -----
I I
J 5 I1 i? I I ---------
i ?Tr IGRADF TO FI F\/ATTnN 1 3

I I I ?
II I
C,
7:) t , I
Lxy
I
I I Q
I
I
I
I ro
I(j) i
^"'L .?I I rn
(
'I. I
h.,1
*
4 I ?GR DING LIMITS
.I. ?
0 -t--_,
°
'
"
:,
1 584
28
50.12
1Y
I
I
I
`f1 I I li
1 `I
I I
I I
II
I I I
PCSta.24.5868
ry1 30' R
PTSIo, 24'89.67

s
lr
?
END ROlUE:
L'
1 j
\` POTSto.26'10.4
I
N?
.............................
MATCHLINE
FOR PROFILE OF "ROAD" SEE SHEE-f 6
FOR PROFILE OF "BERM" SEE SHEET 7
SEE SHEET 4
PROJECT RETf R6NCE NO. SMELT NO.
_ R-2220WLI -5
ROADWAY DESIGN II'(DRAIII ICS
ENGINEER ENGINEER
III (r ?,?'?Bo
__.I NI J (I 14
NIIp ( \\ 1 °il

?!
? 1 v°I>
zl1 I >)?Iti 41-G1)R
I
1( 25 ACRES
?j???? 68
I ,

GRADING LIMITS
N?i.BpG.
G
'
/ ,
, <r y
??'s
a,GS
yl
W
-- -
------------ ------ -----

r
/GRADE TO
T
ELEVATION 1 .7
APPROXIMAT E GRADING LIMITS----- --- -

- ---
+,l't _vl
i?
It
f? r „rl rr ,-/1
nvlN I'nl _
"AV, pI :1NI -
It;nlr,'' _
'Sip iV 1
n Oo W
I]? fol. ?;" \?.. D2i D2
NT3
r /
I:
r _G
v - @ADIN?TS ----/
77
I
I
r°yl.
?yy?I?Y
Il) y) Y}lil\?

I
I

rr?
n.?lY?JYYl-.f(Yn 1 Jll^?-n
r11Y?l..f)'VY1 L. rir'rll.. i'i-", riill
r'i.11.. 1'•1.1 i' 10, nPII
.li YY?l ii"rtif L./i\'/( Yn r?',fYi^!r'f'/-I LJi yr liJir ?'I1 JrYI1111"Y-?)?
rtr'.
-
( t . M/Y 11..lYrl
Yl.
/
c
b '4'
Yi I I Nfl IY/II PIIJ

nxEL ?, 11 POWIA-L, I C.

U.B. 122, PG" /IG3

% 41-88 i1
N/I-
(
I
t(
(
S LEGEND
r
I ---- ---- -
- --
?
I( D4 DENOTES LOCATIONS OF CENTRAL D1TCH BLOCKS •)
/ T/.?,
` ^`I° D2 • DENOTES LOCATIONS OF FEEDER DITCH BLOCKS
$ f
a? ' ?t?lY rf" (SEE SHEET 2•A FOR DETAIL OF DITCH BLOCKS) -
r

Ttil? DPI( ll;dAM)[NAJR)' it-)iLANS
I)O NO1°'PSE FOR CONSFIW(' 'rioN
?29-OCT-1996 00124
/uSNrd?/r2228wm/tucker/1u.kcr,s5
3 I
1
m a ??-fvf-rr?n
N
M t7 Irl' ?// .Y',
2 rI / ,
----GRADING LIMITS r{ T •"), i
Iris .}?
1,?a.v'}.r,,:eJrt}7T
FIGATION-
w
i-UCf--1996 13:30
tu5f/r0Y/r"?2DwNtucker/ IusCer.Dfl
a
v
0
0
`u
s
u
E
-?!V
? t-
m s?
^_'U ?
i??
?-\ 0
O iV*
?]
m\
CL
v
0
0
`v
Y
U
E
>m
-rv
n Ti
nv v
-\ o
? nw
q\
n
0
D
0
v
Y
U
M
E
T
D
V
V
V
L-?
]11
DN
LS
1.?
J

n
v
0
0
v
Y
U
V
E
x
m
rv
?N
Yv
?..
?? n
!v v
u
?o
??-
??
0
a
v
0
0
v`
i
v
E
x
b
V
V
V
by
LS
\0
L?
J
}
a
x
i
0
u
Y
U
V
E
0
v
V
ou
?:
?o
i..
re.
0
n
i
v
v
Y
U
J
E
s
u
v
u
i
?n
nm
u
?o
0
0
n
E
N
d
N
Y
u
v'
E
bJ
'N
-N
?a
???Q
i?t
-\ 0
Jn
i]
a\
a
x
E
v
n
`v
Y
V
3
E
t
ko
'kV
-?N
0? N
n9 N
Ll
-\ o
5 ;il
Nk
i]
o\
M
? v
Mr. Mike Bell
May 17,1996
Page 3
typically associated with bottomland hardwood systems, and support a variety of vegetation typical of
the forested wetlands in this region. Vegetation in these areas includes black gum (Nyssa sylvatiea),
loblolly pine (Pinus taeda), sweet gum (Liquidambar Ayiraoiflua), red maple (Ater rubrum), wax myrtle
(Myrica cerifera), inkberry (ilex glabra), giant cane (Arundinaria gigantea), groundsel tree (Baccharia
halmifolia), red bay (Pemen borbonia) and soft rush (]uacus effusus).
In addition, two wetland areas were ldontificd by our wn*ultant in tho Ballance Farm Feasibility
Study (October, 1995) which contain vegetations similar to that which will be planted in the Tucker
mitigation area. An undisturbed area adjacent to the property (to the north) has vegetation consisting of
black gum, swamp chestnut oak (Quercus lyrata), red maple, black willow, sweet gum, oinnamon fern
(Osmunda cinnAmomea), marsh fern (Thelypteris thelypteroides), and netted chainfem (Woodwardia
arevlata). An area in the western portion of the property along the creek was also identified (adjacent to
the coastal marsh) which includes bald cypress (Taxodium distichiurn).
We agreed that the RE originally proposed for the Tucker Farm site was unacceptable in that it
was Oum-Cypress swamp because the proposed mitigation plantings consist of bottomland hardwoods.
The RE at Ballance Farm was proposed as an alternative and met little or no disagreement in the agency
review meeting on. February 7, 1996.
The existence of ditches near the RE is not relevant, since hydrology anticipated during the
monitoring period is strongly indicated by the water budget model to conform with that needed for the
successful establishment of a bottomland hardwood. The vegetative composition has been impacted by
logging in the past, but so has most of the region, with vary few cKooptions. If there were a regulatory
requirement that only pristine, mature habitat is acceptable for Reference Ecosystems, it would be very
difficult to ever find a suitable site. In out opinion, the RE should serve as a means of matching the
proposed planted vegetative community on the mitigation site to an existing community nearby, Which
has similar soils, hydrology and elevation.
Secondly, although we do intend to compare the mitigation site hydrology with that of the RE
after hydrological modifications are made, NCDOT strongly disagrees that the hydrology of the U
should be used to establish the success criteria for the hydrology of the mitigation site. Although the
post-mitigation hydrology of the RE is expected to exceed the minimum required for it to be called
jurisdictional wetland based on data provided by the water budget model, there is no regulatory guidance
stating that the site must exceed the m inimum criteria set forth in the 1987 COE Wetland Delineation
Manual. (See page 22, the average depth to groundwater on the entire site was 0.54 feet, which already
exceeds the minimum criteria.) Again, the responsibility for the implementation and suc 033 of this
mitigation site is NCDOT's, and if we believe the water budget model's prediction that the hydrology of
a bottomland hardwood will be adequately reinstated, we should be allowed to proceed on that basis, at
our risk.
COMMENT 2: Section 6.7 Monitoring Plan. (III. A. Evaluation and Recourse Action) Several
comments were combined and have been addressed in the order they are listed. Please refer to the
comment letter for the specific comments.
L ?-?lkiW
Z 0d PL94 :ON X31 NOd 1 nN3 GNU 9N I NN:nd: G I 02:9T IM
Mr. Mike Bell
May 17, 19'96
Page 4
RESPONSE 2: The addition of "of plantings" can be added to the first sentence in this section on page
26. The phrase "$01/9 of aerial coverage" can be omitted although it was meant to be plan view coverage
or density.
Hydrologic success will be measured against the COE definition as discussed earlier.
NCDOT maintains that monitoring for three years will be feasible if the original seedlings are tagged,
flagged or staked adequately to be accurately located and counted. Permanent tags will most likely be
used to Imam and label the trees for inventory purposes.
COMMENT 3: Concern that ponding might occur unless interior berms are added.
RESPONSE 3: NODOT is willittg to consider additional berms to prevent localized ponding during the
design phase of site implementation. The addition of berms will require further work on the water
budget model in order to calculate their effects.
COMMENT 1. Section 5.8 Monitoring Plan
RESPONSE 1: We agree to omit the statement that at least 50% of species present within the mitigation
site be facultative wet or obligate. See the first paragraph on page 25 for a discussion of remedial action
in the event of invasion by n,uisa ee, species. We will also add a discussion of remedial action to control
nuisance vegetation, in Section 5.8, Monitoring Plan, III. C., as follows:
"III.C. No invasion or minimal invasion by unwanted/nuisance species at each post-planting event - no
action necessary.
Unacceptable invasion by weedy species (affecting survival of planted species)
I . ]Discuss corrective measures with environmental review agencies.
2. Use of acceptable herbicides.
3. Physical removal of unwanted species"
COMMENT 1: "Incomplete sentence on page ii. blow would excavation of the PC field significantly
reduce infiltration losses (page ii)?"
RESPONSE 1: The first sentence on page ii will be corrected to read as follows:
"Existing tidal freshwater marsh occurs in the northern portion of the property along Buckskin
and Cowells Creek. This area has been designated as the Reference Ecosystem for the creation of coastal
-• EOd PL94 :ON T31 NDd I nN3 QNd 9N I NNUld : Q I TE : 5 T l d.3 9S i -L T-Ad
Mr. Mille Bell
May 17, 1996
Page 5
marsh on-site"
Excavation of the PC field will significantly reduce infiltration losses by removing the upland
soil profile through which rainfall would infiltrate. The newly excavated surface would receive the same
amount of rainfall and would also have wator table at or,naar the surface, thus infiltration would be
virtually eliminated.
COMMENT 2: Concern over Phragmites invasion in the existing marsh and on the mitigation site.
RESPONSE 2: NCDOT is willing to coordinate with NCDCM to discuss how this issue might be
addressed. Also see response to NCWRC Comment 2 on Tucker Farm. The same changes will also be
made to the Casey Tract Mitigation Plan.
COMMENT 3: Concern about Bentonite Seals on Monitoring Wells; concern over well data.
RESPONSE 3: Despite the visual inspection by DEM personnel, the NCDOT has complete confidence
in the validity of the well data. The wells were installed according to EPA criteria and in general
accordance with WES Guidance documents. Please refer to well construction description on page 13,
Section 43.1, second paragraph. Please note that this description includes reference to the mounding of
bentonitc and soil around the interface of the wellhead with the surface.
COMMENT 4: Concerts over Water Budget Summary (Table 3)
USPONSE 4: See revised Water Budget Summary that is attached. This table was added at the request
of DEM at the February 7, 1996 meeting, to assist their understanding of the findings of the post-
mitigation Water Budget. The revised table further elaborates on the assumptions or premises made in
order to provide discrete numbers for all inflow and outflows.
COMMENT 5: Congem over Existing Marsh Elevation
RESPONSE 5: The existing marsh ranges in elevation from 0.3 to 1.2 feet above mean sea level (rnsl)
while the mitigation site ranges from 0.3 to 2.0 feet above mal. The Reference Ecosystem ranges in
elevation from 0.6 to 1.2 feet above mss. The grading must start with the existing surface at 2.0 ft. =1
and slope downwards gradually. The proposed elevations of this site were designed in close
coordination with NCDCM and since the responsibility for the success of this site rests with, NCDOT, we
are satisfied that the proposed elevations will adequately create a functioning marsh ecosystem. X]esign
specifications will be reviewed in coordination with NCl]CM. (See FIG. 9, 10, 13)
20d PL94 :ON X31 NDd I nN3 QNU ON I NNd-1d : QI zE : SI I d3 96 i-Li-ArJW -""
Mr. Mike Hcil
May 17, 1996
Page 6
COMMENT 6: Comment about Ballaoce Pam Mitigations Site.
RESPONSE 6: This will be addressed when we receive comments on the Ballance Farm Draft
Mitigation Plan.
COMMENT 7: Need to include reference site description in plan.
RESPONSE 7: NCDOT will include a description and discussion of the reference site to be used for
Tucker Farm within the Tucker Farm Mitigation Plan, (See response to NCWRC Comment 1 on Tucker
Farm on page 2 of this letter.)
COMMENT 8: Need to make changes to reports in a way that DEM can easily find them. (i.e. italics or
other methods)
RESPONSE 8: This will be done starting with the Ballanoe, -farm Mitigation Plan.
Verbal comments received from you can May 9, 1996, include;
COMMENT 1: Comcer+r over the lack of definitive long-term disposition of the sites.
RESPONSE 1: NCDOT will manage the site for continued success through the monitoring period while
actively pursuing an appropriate entity to assume ownership and manage the site in perpetuity. A list of
potential future owners includes: NCWRC: Currituck Soil and Water Conservation District; the Natural
Resources Conservation Service (by conservation easement), and the ]north Carolina Coastal Land Trust.
In the past, small sites such as Casey and Tucker have been difficult to find long-term stewardship far.
While there is no prohibition against NCDOT retaining ownership of any of its mitigation sites, should
we choose to do so, deed restrictions would be established to protect the site and manage it in the future.
This will be arranged during the Implementation and monitoring of the site. However, until we have a
successful, functioning site, it seems premature to try to designate future ownership.
COMMENT 2: Concern over language in the second paragraph of Section 6.6 on page 25 in the Fucker
plan, -Acm it is stated that certain species ma be planted.
RESPONSE 2: The word "may" will be changed to "°will" on the understanding that it does not preclude
changes based on availability, as coordinated with the appropriate agencies. Please refer to the attached
Table which shows the "Tree Species to be planted on the Fucker Farm Mitigation Site".
POd VL94 :ON X31 NOd I nN3 QNd 9N I NNU ld : Q I 22 : S ti I dd 96 a -L 1-AdW
Mr. Mike Bell
May 17,1996
Page 7
We believe that our responses to the comments ought to be sufficient to allow the Tucker Fam
and Casey Tract mitigation sites to enter the implementation phase, and for required permits for the NC
168 project to be issued. We plan to include you in various meetings during the design phase of the sites,
as well as after contracts have been awarded for site preparation and vegetation planting. We are
committed to do everything in our power to produce functioning wetland mitigation sites at the Tucker
Farm and the Casey Tract.
Sincerely,

David C. Robinson
Permits and Wetland Mitigation Unit Head
Planning and Environmental Branch
Attachments
cc: H. Franklin Vi4, P.B.
B. J. O'Quinn, F.E.
Sod VL94 :ON 131 NOd I nN3 GNU ON I NNUi d: Q I VDS T I dJ 96 Lti-AUW
0;"10,'96 0:3,03 03 59SOUPC9 SOUTHEAST
TREE SPECIES TO BE PLANTIM
TUCKER FARM MITIGATION SITE
l Tulip poplar
(Doiddendran tullp(ora)
Cherry barb oak
(Quercus pagodoefolla)
Water oak
(Qwmus ttlgra)
Swamp chestnut oak
(Quercus lyrata)
2 Water oak
(&ercm nigra)
Swamp chestnut ook
(Quervis Irma)
Latirel oak
(Quorcus luurifolia)
Willow oak
(Quercus phellos)
Willow oak
(Qui"Oew phallos)
Ovexup oak
Quercus lyrata)
Tupelo gum
(Nyssa aquaHea)
omm ash
(Froximus ponnsylvanica)
Bald cypnom
(Taxodium distichiur)
NO. 46? Q07,70
• '" A minim n of six tree species will be planted in the mitigation a. -Mesa species will
include at least three .spedce in each zone.
60d 17L94 :ON 131 NOdInN9 UNd 9NINNU-1d:aI 62:ST Idj 96,-LT-Auw
05,/10.'96 03:04 RESOURCE SOUTHEAST NO. 467 005
DEVISED
TABLE 3
WATER BUDGET SUMMARY FOR MITIGATIONS E
INFLOWS AND OUTFLOWS
(inakea of waterlyew) PRE-MITIGATION POST MITIGATION
Precipitation + 47.93 inches + 47.93 inches
Evapotranspiration - 40.46 inches . 40.46 640*
Surface Runoff - 3.39 inches 0 inchos
Infiltration -13.00 inches 0 inches
Canal Evaporation, 0 i,nehes - 5.45 inches
Lek Mflows . 0 inches + 8,54 inches
GRAND TOTAL - 7,92 inches + 10.52 inches
NOTES: 11 Evapotranspiration losses for proposed wetland vegetation utilized for
both pre and post mitigation totals,
2. trifiltration estimated m 12 inches for existing gonditions as the site's
groundwater table is less than 12 inches below the surface.
3. Canal evaporation estimated at an annual evaporation rate of 34 inches per
you for the stnfaec area of the eels. Approximatcly 1.0 acre of water
surface present at high tide.
4. Creek inflow estimated as depth of main canal or 9,5 Inches.
0Td PL9# :ON T31 NONIM3 QNU 9NINNd-1d:0 Ob:Sti I8A 96.-Li-AUW
?,,;, r l"1 t `t96 O oT //• qg,,?-, ?+?w a CaSeti Tc..c- e./? T??.c,-fS
Gc?c\S v? w.?--h?5
c4o%.?7 agyu\os 4o ,JCItiry GonS4rvc?A a/? rJl?t.3 w•'T I?. /j . 4?'?a}?`? ?/?It,,.S
2 C.t??tT.J Go1?Ci@g' Edt?QC?iaR(? V+S: ?. ?j.rf,
3 ww4 ; ti,,???Ral?c,?2 response ?r? oc,?f.

T,.c,r? - 5,???.Q1' cans-?rZ,•c?.`on tl ,p?w.?'?? (trict?

A^ckrec, war [" ,\C
Se, - ail acres
20 ?e aly4inc
S?aS ?nQ c?J`2G. - U,Sec? •?J' S^?a rocg Cor?S'M??+ yn .M4u+b1 " c+.cc ers
-?o Pro t,r VA? 5kv.,O Stc?ra4SZ Greg ¢ oft,
??, SiwnRS Ma?S ACCQ$S
S e CGJee, slw?.?? /?,.?ar`n St`z cs r/1 cc/?4
c.se fez nacl s. Cj , i
t ,I
- - a. . ?h?'?h`? ??? -urea . _
be b7 p?cr¢s ,,s:, (LAi
s?
I
't?;{.+? ¢??1 or c?'GUvv?V? 7io? or\ ?v - ??CGG?o?TVe?t ?V?m,[R o
?o Alm l.-5
- - e,?CGVo:-?? ?5 - ?,,,: ?? ?? Co?.?fa?'W? _ r{ ?ayf - s wok- ?-t, ,
c6 of a,A,:.n
y 3 0 e?cc??eo? ,ivy ?.e?, a
000
G LAAZ: s or
- - I_ZSS ho c aJw1+??
Sa l (. z for ??r t-+'?rza.?.?n 1?1?+c?cJ(aSy '7 cq?(q¢,i`??C??1 co.-....t?
P? 1+n? 'tC0 S,,i 1 '1'tSTS (AC,n? co..V..+Man,-}-; t-v?SQ??
Svctt'Cl?O cl plc-? yY4rl) r,%-- Ce, e Cug
rAo o ko(`Q.. TkW\ C C1 ??c? rum f'e +f` f1? 5?

0
or c"r16V4le ctfw__i
tlM T

P? ? -? pia ?R??ess'es ?tex? ?,'?,-? ? o?? w•r ? ??n?? u?t?? s1?G'
?iv2 Gr Avr, n ?j i ;cum Ji- God fyv?,i
- i n (? lw•
SQQCAinq I-Q-1 k O AA,.,,` I-, e- or- we9 A (c'-A C x'41 a ?'? n?.wc a? ?

?' ? 5(v?QS I?¢cr ?oit?.lC ? S'I??'? c?rea
:l 5?ci(l? AQ-P-, CaO C G,rb A 5 A I,
a?
/riayr,AUw1 G1M0?++? RXce.vw7, tS ^' 02 F --
06T - 1rf can-W."- " Aeo A _TPFQ' -16 Can?ILC1O/' ?a? ?e ?i/tc k r"s
( POSQo? ? t V? TO tom- {?11Clc?i t?`ec.? /YeeA -`14 40 kL'? con-bc??r tnZ.grao? j f necers4?, A o T- cam, o s ?o
J
rvq?cA? ,?.?,y e _ n ec ,ra f?,s ptGeA
T4b? w: wl?kr all

55:+2 r sec%Ar: deer ?un J TQ,? bel"PAJ- DoT- ;s
e6rl wo?K; CW. s nr ?haW,?,
CeS?vJ1. oveC C?n?.i,W.?: Sr r2?w. o G31 ? ?T _ /\M"l
- _?AQ?'25.. C.??- (?Q?r?-??' corol?`?:av? ?:nd ?eStu¢.? _
I_ S•? 1 ?
Cow?UC?,`?^
or
G

4
MEMORANDUM:
TO: John R. Parker
FROM: Dennis W. Hawthorn
.
SUBJECT: NC 168 Mitigation Sites
DATE: February 7, 1996
Attached are my recommendations for the subject NC DOT mitigation documents for
coastal marsh impacts to be mitigated. This document does not comment on the 404 sites or
impacts and does not address the Balance site.
cc: Eric Galamb, DEM
Mike Bell, COE
Robin M. Little, NCDOT
Lynn Stemmy, Resource Southeast
Katherine Doak, USFWS
Chad Thomas, NCWRC
Kin Hodges, NCWRC
William Wescott, NCWRC
David Cox, NCWRC
Randy Turner, NCDOT
File
V
#6 a:\ncl68mit.com
MEMORANDUM
TO : John Parker, Brian Bledsoe
FROM Dennis W. Hawthorn
SUBJECT NC 168 Widening
Coastal Marsh Mitigation Plan,
Casey Tract Mitigation Site Draft Mitigation Plan,
Currituck County
DATE November 7, 1995
November 22, 1995 Revised
On November 6, 1994 DCM issued Major Permit # 139-94 to the
applicant concerning the first phase of work proposed on the
subject roadway project in Currituck County. Conditions on this
Permit included that future applications or permit issuance
concerning this proposed work would include a mitigation plan that
addressed the entire project impacts; and also that coastal wetland
impacts would be off-set by a coastal wetland creation mitigation
ratio of 1 to 3. The entire road-widening project is projected to
impact somewhere between 1.44 and 1.89 acres of coastal wetlands.
At the specified ratio. of 1 to 3, this would require that the
proposed mitigation provide somewhere between 4.32 and 5.67 acres
of constructive coastal wetlands. The draft Plan proposes to
create 5.5 acres of freshwater-tidal marsh and preserve 4.0 acres
of other existing wetlands. This memo does not concern the proposed
U.S. COE wetland mitigation site.
The applicant via Resources International, Inc. has prepared
mitigation plans for both freshwater (404) and coastal wetland
impacts for this road project. Our staff have reviewed the subject
draft coastal site mitigation plan in regard to the existing Permit
and the proposed Major Permit Application concerning the NC 168
roadway-widening project.
Positive points within the Plan include the proposed site is
within the drainage area where the impacts will actually occur and
coastal wetlands-are adjacent to the proposed mitigation area. The
proposed mitigation site is also within a watershed which has been
identified by natural resource managers as an important habitat
resource to fish and wildlife resources within the Currituck and
Albemarle Sounds.
Weaknesses identified in the draft Plan concern mostly site
preparation and planting methodologies. The draft Plan does not
elaborate on actual site preparation in regard to applying suitable
soils or the best time to complete site preparations and plantings.
r'
L
John Parker/Brian Bledsoe
November 7, 1995
Page Two
The following.comments concern these recommended revisions.
In our past experiences with mitigation planting, we have
learned that the two most important conditions necessary to
establish a successful constructive wetland are to provide to the
site sufficient hydrology and a suitable soil on the upper-most
soil horizon. Mitigation literature also stresses these conditions
for establishing successful constructive wetland sites.
As you know, hydrology can be provided by either excavation or
altering adjacent drainage (or a combination of the two). A
suitable soil should provide the right chemical make-up, texture
and nutrients as well as a seed source for desirable volunteer
wetland species.
To establish hydrology at the proposed coastal marsh
mitigation site, the draft plan proposes a combination of drainage
alteration and excavation. We concur with this proposed action.
The draft Plan recommends that excavated soils from disturbed
wetland areas elsewhere on the road project be used in the
constructed wetland to provide a suitable soil for establishing a
freshwater-tidal marsh. We assume freshwater-tidal marsh and
coastal marsh are synonymous. We concur with using excavated
wetland spoil from elsewhere on the project to provide a suitable
soil. However, where these soils will come from, how they will be
stockpiled, how and where they should be applied on the site have
not been sufficiently discussed in the draft Plan.
Soil testing at the excavated horizon at the mitigation site
should be conducted to see what amendments will be necessary at the
final grade. Areas along the road project where suitable excavated
soils are present should be identified. This work may have
already been conducted but is not clear in the draft Plan.
We feel that if a suitable soil is provided at the right time,
with the right hydrology, that the actual plantings could be
reduced or possibly, eliminated. We recommend the final Plan
include a more detailed methodology which identifies the actual
soil chemistry at the proposed "planting" horizon, as well as
identify actual soil sources along the project or elsewhere in the
NC DOT system which could be stockpiled for use at the mitigation
site.
Provisions for acquiring these soils and maintaining these
stockpiles should be included in the final Plan. The time frame or
season that the soil is applied and prepared should be discussed in
detail. Actual compaction of the applied soil and the specific
areas which need soil amendments should be outlined and should also
John Parker/Brian Bledsoe
November 71 1995
Page Three
be such as to best promote volunteer growth. It is conceivable
that the mitigation site could be almost entirely re-vegetated with
desirable volunteer coastal species from excavated wetland soil if
the imported soils were placed at the right places, the right way,
at the right time.
We believe that if the mitigation methodology included these
details referenced above regarding soil and hydrology, that actual
planting of coastal species could be reduced. If within the first
growing season, desirable volunteer coastal species can be
established at the site through the proper seed soil applications,
an even, random distribution of coastal marsh species plantings
would have difficulty competing with the volunteer plantings and
would likely be unnecessary. If at that time, it was desirable to
have additional species, these planted species would compete better
if they were more mature and planted in clusters or colonies.
These plantings, if necessary should occur in the second growing
season. This methodology would maximize the volunteer seed stock
and assure that the actual plantings not be choked out by the
volunteer plant species. Maintenance of this type of planting
would also be much easier. This methodology would reduce the
maintenance of planted species at the site but may require an
additional year of monitoring.
In summary, the final Plan should include a more detailed
methodology about preparing the site including details concerning
where to acquire desirable seed soil, how to stockpile this soil so
that it can be used at a later date, when and where to place it on
the mitigation site, and at what compaction rate.
If the above recommended conditions are utilized, the
proposed plantings could be revised to best assure their survival
with a minimum of maintenance.
We believe these refinements to the draft Plan would result in
a successful constructive mitigation site. These refinements may
also reduce the overall mitigation costs.

Page Four
ATTACHMENT 1
November 22, 1995
NC DOT 168 WETLAND MITIGATION PLAN SPECIFIC CONDITIONS
(1) Plan shall be written from a point of view which commits the
permittee to proceed and complete specific items within the Plan.
(2) Plan shall provide a commitment and / or mechanism (deed
restriction) which will require the mitigation site to remain in an
undeveloped conservation type land use suitable to sustain coastal
wetland species. In addition, the plan should stress that its goal
is to create coastal wetlands as opposed to freshwater-tidal
wetlands or other wetlands.
(3) Plan shall provide a time table which will specify a schedule
for site monitoring, preparation and planting.
(4) Plan shall establish criteria to measure the success of
hydrologic modifications to the site as well as success criteria
for site grading, seed-soils application and site re-vegetation.
(5) The Plan shall require the submittal of as-built reports
within thirty days of completion of each work item (ie. grading,
observation well monitoring, planting). Plan shall specify a
schedule for reporting observations in regard to site success
related to the above referenced success criteria.
(6) Plan shall identify.areas to be excavated from both aerial and
cross-sectional views.
(7) Plan shall specify placement of monitoring wells and
monitoring schedule for site water-table observations.
(8) Plan shall require monitoring of wind tides on the adjacent
creek(s) and drainage ways.
(9) Plan shall require a thorough soil study of the mitigation
site which adequately investigates sub-soil horizons where
excavation will occur to determine soil suitability at those
horizons and what soil amendments should be applied at the final
grade.
(10) Plan shall provide a procedure methodology for utilizing seed-
spoil including seed-spoil identification elsewhere on the project,
as well as it's collection, stockpiling and installation.
Installation details should address grade work, disking, soil
compaction and soil amendments.
(11) Plan shall address necessary site regrading and mechanisms for
controlling un-desirable plant species within the mitigation site.

Page Five
ATTACHMENT 1
NC 168 WETLAND MITIGATION PLAN SPECIFIC CONDITIONS
November 22, 1995
(12) Plan shall establish a 5 year monitoring schedule.
(13) Prior to planting, the Plan shall require that the Permittee
utilize and evaluate volunteer plant species found on the site
within the first year or growing season to determine if planting of
the entire mitigation site will be necessary in regard to
establishing a coastal wetland site.
(14) If mitigation planting is necessary to re-vegetate the site
with coastal wetland species, the Plan shall require planting of
coastal plant species best suited for survival within the Buckskin-
Cowells-Tulls Creek watersheds, in consultation with a DCM
representative. Plant size, spacing and maintenance should be such
that trans-plants will be able to establish a stable coastal
wetland marsh within the five year monitoring period. Monitoring of
trans-plants will include an evaluation to determine if re-planting
a second or additional time be required to establish a stable
coastal wetland marsh within the five year monitoring period.
(15) Plan shall require that the site be permanently marked with an
identification sign designating the area as a Coastal Wetland
Mitigation site and within the North Carolina Estuarine System AEC.
(16) Plan shall require permanent marking and maintenance of all
monitoring wells, gages and sample plots associated with the five
year site monitorng.
(17) Plan shall provide provisions for alternative hydrological
modifications, grading or plantings within the monitoring period.
These alternatives shall address or correct problems or short falls
identified during the five year monitoring period.
AAMM
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF 1P,,ANSPORTATION
JAMES B. HUNT JR. P.O. BOX 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201
GOVERNOR
August 14, 1998
Ms. Cyndi Bell
Division of Water Quality
4401 Reedy Creek Rd LV(,' 13 1998
Raleigh, NC 27607 1
WETLANDS CROUP
_ W;,TED DUALITY SECNON
Re: Casey Tract Wetland Mitigation Site, Currltuck C(
TIP Project No. R-2228 WM
Dear Ms. Bell:
E. NORRIS TOLSON
SECRETARY
Please find enclosed the As-Built Report for the Casey Tract Mitigation Site
located in Currituck County. The Resident Engineer responsible for this project, Mr.
Tom Brite has certified that the site was constructed according to construction plan
sheets, with any exceptions noted in this As-Built Report.
For completeness purposes, the following information has been included as part
of the As-Built Report: (1) Letter of Construction Compliance, (2) As-Built Plan
Sheet(s), (3) Planting Plan Sheets, (4) Well Location Map, (5) Contract Proposal, (6)
Summary of Costs, (7) Estimate of Quantities, and (8) Photos.
If you should have any questions or require additional information, please do not
hesitate to contact Phil Harris, Wetland Mitigation Coordinator, at 919-733-7844 (Ext.
301). Thank you once again for your continued support and cooperation.
Sincerely
David C. Robinson, Ph.D, P.E.
Assistant Branch Manager
Enclosures
cc: Mr. David Franklin, USACE
Dr. V. Charles Bruton, NCDOT
Mr. Phil Harris, P.E., NCDOT

E C CONST. 1@002
08/10198 08:10 '8'919 331 4862
. 4-W
•
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
JAIV.IES B. HUNT JR. P.O. Box 25201, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611-5201 E. NORRIS TOLSON
GovmNOR SECRETARY
LETTER OF CONSTRUCTION COMPLIANCE
PO Box 1405
Elizabeth City, NC 27909
July 6,1998
State Project Number: 6.049009T (R-2228 WM)
County: Currituck
Description: Casey Tract Mitigation Site AVG 10 1995
MEMORANllUIy? RWW OWNER
TO' ???. Tom Brite •'
Division 1 Resident Engineer
FROM: Mr. Phil Harris, P.E., Wetland Mitigation Coordinator
SUBJECT: Casey Tract Mitigation Site
Construction of the Casey Tract wetland mitigation site was monitored and inspected by
my office in conformity with constiuction plans prepared by NCDOT.
I hereby certify that the Casey Tract project has been constructed according to plan
sheets, except in the case of certain field revisions that are noted on attached plan sheets
and any narrative attachments to this letter.
Every effort was made to construct this site in accordance with the best information and
guidance that was availablc at the time. Please advise if you need any additional
information regarding this matter.
attachment(s)
cc: Mr. Phil Harris, P.E., Wetland Mitigation Coordinator
Ms. Kendra Williamson, Wetland Mitigation Engineering Assistant
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
*00M_N'4t?
DIVISION 1 DISTRICT 3
ONTR ACT PROPOSAL
WORK ORDER NUMBER: 6.049009T
COUNTY: u ck
ROUTE: "Tucker Farm" & "Casey Farm" Wetland Mitigation Sites are located
approximately 0.66 miles northeast of the intersection of NC 34 and
NC'168 near Sligo
DESCRIPTION: Forest Tree Planting & Marsh Grass Planting
BID OPENING: November 14 1997 at 10.00 A.M.
NOTICE:
ALL BIDDERS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE LAWS
REGULATING THE PRACTICE OF GENERAL CONTRACTING AS
CONTAINED IN CHAPTER 87 OF THE GENERAL STATUTES OF
NORTH CAROLINA WHICH REQUIRES THE BIDDER TO BE
LICENSED BY THE NC LICENSING BOARD FOR CONTRACTORS
WHEN BIDDING ON ANY NON-FEDERAL AID PROJECT WHERE
THE BID IS $30,000 OR MORE, EXCEPT FOR CERTAIN SPECIALTY
WORK AS DETERMINED BY THE LICENSING BOARD. BIDDERS
SHALL ALSO COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER APPLICABLE LAWS
REGULATING THE PRACTICES OF ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING,
HEATING AND AIR CONDITIONING AND REFRIGERATION
CONTRACTING AS CONTAINED IN CHAPTER 87 OF THE GENERAL
STATUTES OF NORTH CAROLINA.
N.C CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE NUMUER
NAME OF DIDDLR
N C. CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE NUMBER
NAMU OF BIDDER
RETURN BIDS TO: North Carolina Department Of Transportation
113 Airport Drive
Edenton, NC 27932
ATTN.: MR. D.R. Conner, PE
3 3 ??
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Instructions to Bidders
Standard ProVisionS

.....................................
l ........................1
...
.............................................
Genera
Contract Time & Liquidated Damages .................................. ...........................1
...............
.
i ...........................2
.
neer ..........................................
Authority of Eng
............
t ............................2
or ........................................
Supervision by Contrac
............
ti
' ............................2
on .......................................
s Compensa
Workmen
........................
:
I ...........................3
......................
nsurance ................
Liability
Coordination Between Contractors ...................................... ............................3
.................
t
f ............................3
.........................................
Contrac
Subletting o
....................
t ............................3
...........................................
Default of Contrac
..................
i ............................3
nage ........................................
Payment & Reta
CnPcial Provisions
Tucker Farm Forest Tree Planting ..............................•••••5
Casey Farm Marsh Grass Planting ...................................................................5
Minority and Women Business Enterprises .....................................................6
Prosecution and Progress ...:..............................................................................7
Vicinity Map (Tucker & Case 8
Vicinity Map (Casey Transplant Site) ............................................................
Division Contract Bid Form
W-9 Form
INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS
PLEASE READ ALL INSTRUCTIONS CAREFULLY
BEFORE PREPARING AND SUBMITTING YOUR BID.
All bids shall be prepared and submitted in accordance with the following requirements. Failure to comply
with any requirement shall cause the bid to be considered irregular and shall be grounds for rejection of the
bid.
1. The bid sheet furnished by NCDOT with the proposal shall be used and shall not be altered in any
manner. DO NOT SEPARATE THE BID SHEET FROM THE PROPOSAL!
2. All entries on the bid sheet, including signatures, shall be written in ink.
3. The Bidder shall submit a unit price for every item on the bid form. The unit prices for the various
contract items shall be written in figures.
4. An amount bid shall be entered on the bid sheet for every item. The amount bid for each item shall
be determined by multiplying each unit bid by the quantity for that item, and shall be written in
figures in the "Amount Bid" column of the sheet.
5. The total amount bid shall be written in figures in the proper place on the bid sheet. The total amount
shall be determined by adding the amounts bid for each item.
6. Changes in any entry shall be made by marking through the entry in ink and making the correct entry
adjacent thereto in ink. A representative of the Bidder shall initial the change in ink.
7. The bid shall be properly executed. All bids shall show the following information:
a. Name of individual, firm, corporation, partnership, or joint venture submitting bid.
b. Name of individual or representative submitting bid and position or title.
C. Name, signature, and position or title of witness.
d. Federal Identification Number.
8. Bids submitted by corporations shall bear the seal of the corporation.
9. The bid shall not contain any unauthorized additions, deletions, of conditional bids.
10. The Bidder shall not add any provision reserving the right to accept or reject an award, or to enter
into a contract pursuant to an award.
11. THE PROPOSAL WITH THE BID SHEET STILL ATTACHED SHALL BE PLACED IN A
SEALED ENVELOPE AND SHALL HAVE BEEN DELIVERED TO AND RECEIVED IN
THE NCDOT DIVISION 1 OFFICE AT 113 AIRPORT DRVIE EDENTON, NC 27932, ON
NOVEMBER 14, 1997.
12. The sealed bid must display the following statement on the front of the sealed envelope:
QUOTATION FOR FOREST TREE PLANTING (TUCKER & CASEY) TO BE OPENED ON
NOVEMBER 14, 1997 AT 10:00 A.M.
13. If delivered by mail, the sealed envelope shall be placed in another sealed envelope and the outer
envelope shall be addressed as follows:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
C/O MR. D.R. CONNER, PE
113 AIRPORT DRIVE
EDENTON, NC 27932
AWARD OF CONTRACT
The award of the contract, if it be awarded, will be made to the lowest responsible Bidder. The
lowest responsible will be notified that his bid has been accepted and that he has been awarded the
contract. NCDOT reserved the right to reject all bids.
DIVISION CONTRACT
Standard Provisions
GENERAL
This Contract is for approximately 25 acres of Forest Tree Planting at the Tucker
Farm Wetland Mitigation site and approximately 4.92 acres of the Marsh Grass Planting
at the Casey Farm Wetland Mitigation site. The Contractor may bid on the Tucker Site
(Option A), on the Casey Site (Option B) or both sites combined (Option C), as the
projects may be awarded separately or together.
All Work and materials shall be in accordance with the provisions of the General
Guidelines of this contract, the Project Special Provisions, the North Carolina Department
of Transportation Standard Specifications for Roads and Structures 1995, the North
Carolina Department of Transportation Roadway Standards Drawings, and the current
edition of the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD).
The Contractor shall keep himself fully informed of all Federal, State and local laws,
ordinances and regulations, and shall comply with the provisions of Section 107 of the
Standard Specifications.
CONTRACT TIME AND LIQUIDATED DAMAGES
The availability date for the Tucker Farm & Casey Farm plantings is December
15,1998.
The completion date for the Tucker Farm & Casey Farm plantings is March 13,
1998.
The contractor may begin work prior to this date upon approval of the Engineer or
his duly authorized representative. If such approval is given, and the Contractor begins
work prior to the date of availability, the Department of Transportation will assume no
responsibility for any delays caused prior to the date of availability by any reason
whatsoever, and such delays, if any, will not constitute a valid reason for extending the
completion date.
No work will be permitted and no purchase order will be issued until all prerequisite
conditions and certifications have been satisfied.
No extensions will be authorized except as authorized by Article 108-10 of Shy
Standard Specifications for Roads and Structures 1995
Liquidated damages for this (these) contract(s) are 300.00 dollars per calendar
day.
LIABILITY INSURANCE
The Contractor shall obtain from an insurance company, duly authorized to do
business in North Carolina, Public Liability and Property Damage Insurance to protect his
company and subcontractors performing work covered under this contract from claims
which may arise from operations under this contract. Insurance coverage shall be
maintained during the life of this contract and shall extend to operations performed by the
Contractor or his Subcontractors, and by anyone employed directly or indirectly by either
of them.
Public Liability Insurance shall be in an amount not less than one hundred thousand
dollars ($100,000.00) for injuries, including accidental death, to any on person, and
subject to the same limit for each person, in an amount not less than one hundred
thousand dollars ($100,000.00) on account of one accident.
Property Damage Insurance shall be in an amount not less than one hundred
thousand dollars.($100,000.00).
Proof of insurance shall be furnished to the Engineer prior to beginning work.
COORDINATION BETWEEN CONTRACTORS
The Contractor's attention is directed to Article 105-7 of the Standard
Specifications. There is a Roadway Construction Project adjacent to the area that will be
planted at the Tucker Farm and Casey Wetland Mitigation Sites.
The Contractor on these projects shall cooperate with the Contractor working
within or adjacent to the limits of this project to the extent that the work can be carried
out to the best advantage of all concerned.
SUBLETTING OF CONTRACT
The Contractor shall not sublet, sell, transfer, assign or otherwise dispose of this
contract of any portions thereof; or his right, title, or interest therein; without written
consent of the Engineer. Subletting of this contract or any portion of the contract shall
conform to the requirements of Article of 108-6 of the Standard S12, ; ications. The
Contractor will not be permitted to sublet more than 50% of the total contract amount.
DEFAULT OF CONTRACT
The Department of Transportation shall have the right to declare a default of contract
for breach by the Contractor of any material term of condition of the contract. Default of
contract shall be in accordance with the terms, conditions, and procedures of Article 108-
9 of the Standard Speditations.
PAYMENT AND RETAINAGE
The Contractor may submit a request for partial payment on a monthly basis, or other
interval as approved by the Engineer. The amount of partial payments will be based on
the work accomplished and accepted as the last day of the approved pay period. All
3
Special rovisions
z -
TUCKER FARM
FOREST TREE PLANTING (Approx. 25 ACRES)
The Department will furnish all seedlings (see enclosed Planting Plan). All
seedlings will be bare root. The Contractor will be required to pick up seedlings on a
daily basis from the North Carolina Forest Services'(NCFS) Office in Goldsboro and
transport them to the planting site. Only the number of seedlings scheduled to be planted
each day shall be secured. Other allowances will be made if the Contractor can provide
refrigerated facilities on the planting site.
Seedlings must be transported, stored, handled and planted using the utmost care,
observing industry standard criteria.
No planting shall be done when the temperature is below 32 degrees (F), when
soil to be excavated for the planting hole is frozen, when the bottom of the plant holes are
frozen, or when the soil is too wet.
All proposed planting areas will be clearly staked (or flagged on existing tree
lines) throughout the site, by the Engineer, according to the enclosed Planting Plan.
The method of planting shall be by means of a planting spade and not dibble bars.
The entire planting operation shall comply with section 1670 of the 5audard
?pPrifications.
Trees shall be planted as noted on the enclosed plans and shall be a random mix
spaced on 8 foot centers at a density of approximately 680 per acre. Random Sampling
will be performed by the Department to insure that proper planting techniques and tree
densities are present.
The Contractor shall selectively place certain species within each region as
represented on the planting plan or as directed by the Engineer. This is to ensure that the
actual on-site conditions match the growing conditions of certain species.
The quantity of planting, measured and accepted, will be paid for at the contract
unit bid price per acre for "Forest Tree Planting". All other items will be considered
incidental to the work and no separate payment will be made for such.
CASEY FARM
MARSH GRASS PLANTING (Approx. 4.92 ACRES)
The Contractor will be responsible for the collection and installation of plant
material for this site.
gJant Material To Be Collected and Transplanted (per planting plant
Zone 1: Juncus effusus (Common rush), Scirpus cyperinus (Woolgrass) (0.63 ac.)
Zone 2: Cladium Jamaicense (Saw-rass), Scripus americanus (Three-square) (2.13 ac.)
Zone 3: Spartina cynosuroides (Giant cordgrass) (2.16 ac.)
5
Resorts
The Contractor shall submit a statement with the final invoice to report all MB and
WB participation on the project. In the event the Contractor had no MB and WB
participation on the project, he is still required to submit a statement with the final
invoice reporting no participation. Where participation is from MB and WB Material
Suppliers of Manufacturers, the statement shall indicate the appropriate percentage (60%
for regular dealers, and 100% for manufacturers) of expenditures to be reported.
THE CONTRACTORS STATEMENT OF MB AND WB PARTICIPATION MUST BE
DELIVERED TO THE DEPARTMENT IN ORDER FOR THE FINAL INVOICE TO BE
PROCESSED FOR PAYMENT.
PROSECUTION AND PROGRESS
The Contractor shall pursue the work diligently with workmen in sufficient numbers,
abilities, and supervision, and with equipment, materials, and methods of construction as
may be required to complete the work described in the contract by the completion date
and in accordance with Section 108 of the Standard Specifications.
All work shall be pursued in a continual, progressive fashion such that all tasks in a
particular are totally completed before mobilizing to another location.
The Contractor's operations are restricted to daylight hours. No work may be
performed on Sundays and legal State holidays. Work shall only be performed when
weather and visibility conditions allow safe operations.
7
VICINITY MAP

Work Order Number: §,,.Q42DM
Description: "Tuck F -" °- "Casev Farm" Wetland Mitigation Sites located
. im tely 0.66 miles nnrthPaSt of the NC 34 & NC 168 intersection
near Sli o
County: QurritUc
BALANCE TRACT
(Trc?sPlant_Locatioo=for Casey Tract)
c.[? of.r ur • ?
\ ? CASEY TRACT li •? ?\ - `?~ .?-`_j;?? I
r 1
1 r j TUCKER TRACT
7
North Carolina Department of Transportation
DIVISION CONTRACT BID FORM
(OPTION A)
Work Order Number: 6.049009T
Description: "Tucker Farm" Wetland Mitigation Site located aR roximately 0.66 miles northeast of the NC 34
& NC 168 intersection near Sligo
County: a 'tuc
ITEM SECT DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT AMOUNT
PRICE BID
1 SP Forest Tree Planting (Tucker 25 Ac.
Farm Wetland Site)
TOTAL BID FOR PROJECT:
NOTE: THE CONTRACTOR MAY BID ON EITHER ONE OR BOTH OF THE PROJECTS LISTED ABOVE AS THEY
CAN BE AWARDED SEPARATELY OR TOGETHER.
CONTRACTOR
ADDRESS
Federal Identification Number
Authorized Agent
Signature
Witness
Signature
THIS SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT ATIQN
This bid has bees: reviewed in accordance with Article 103-1 of the Standard Specificatiotis for Roads and
Structures 1990. (date)
Reviewed by
Title
Date
Title
Date
Accepted by NCDOT Division En-ineer (elate)
North Carolina Department of Transportation
DIVISION CONTRACT BID FORM
(OPTION B)
Work Order Number: 6.049009T
Description: "Casey Farm" Wetland Mitigation Site located =proximately 0.66 miles northeast of the NC 34
& NC 168 intersection near Sliao
County: Currituck
ITEM SECT DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT AMOUNT
PRICE BID
2 SP Marsh Grass Transplanting 4.92 Ac.
(Casey Farm Wetland Site)
TOTAL BID FOR PROJECT:
., .?,- mTTr, nT?n TSf`TQ T Tc-rrn A TZAVF A.Q THF.V
NOTE: THE CONTRA(- TVx MA Y 151U V11 Gi 1 nr LI. vL. u v.. uv • •. ?. . ••? • _•? -- - _
CAN BE AWARDED SEPARATELY OR TOGETHER.
CONTRACTOR
ADDRESS
Federal Identification Number
Authorized Agent
Signature
Witness
Signature
Title
Title
Date
Date
THIS SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
This bid has been reviewed in accordance with Article 103-1 of the Standard Specifications for Roads and
Structures 1990.
Reviewed by (date)
Accepted by NCDOT
Division Engineer (date)
9
North Carolina Department of Transportation
DIVISION CONTRACT BID FORM
(OPTION C)
Work Order Number: 6.049009T
Description: "Tucker Farm" & "Casey Farm" Wetland Mitigation Sites located annroxmately 0 66 miles
northeast of the NC 34 & NC 168 intersection near Sligo
County: urrituck
ITEM SECT DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT
PRICE AMOUNT
BID

I SP Forest Tree Planting (Tucker 29.92 Ac.
Farm Wetland Site) & Marsh
Grass Transplanting (Casey
Farm Wetland Site)
TOTAL BID FOR PROJECT: ,
NOTE: THE CONTRACTOR MAY BID ON EITHER ONE OR BOTH OF THE PROJECTS LISTED ABOVE AS THEY
CAN BE AWARDED SEPARATELY OR TOGETHER.
ADDRESS
Federal Identification Number
Authorized Agent
Signature
Witness
Signature
Title
Date
Date
THIS SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
This bid has been reviewed in accordance with Article 103-1 of the Standard Specifications for Roads and
Structures 1990.
Reviewed by (date)
Accepted by NCDOT
Title
Division Enbineer -(date)
10
Form W-9
[Rev. 1-92; Rev. 10-94
for Division Contract Use]
Pursuant to Internal Revenue Service Regulations, vendors must furnish their Taxpayer Identification
Number (TIN) to the State. If this number is not provided, you maybe subject to a 3l% withholding on
each payment. To avoid this 31% withholding and to insure that accurate tax information is reported to
the Internal Revenue Service and the State, please use this form to provide the requested information
exactly as it appears on file with the IRS.
Legal Business Name
Address
9 Digit Taxpayer Identification Number
Social Security Number
Federal Employer Identification Number
Business Designation (Check One;;
Individual
Sole Proprietorship
Partnership
Estate/Trust
Corporation
Public Service Corporation
Govemmental/Non-Pro fit
(Requires SSN)
66
(Requires Federal Tax ID)
66
66
66
66
Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this request and to the best of my knowledge
and belief, it is true, correct, and complete. I have not been notified by the IRS that I am subject to,
backup withholding for failure to report income.
Name (Print o(Typc)
Title (Print of Type)
Signature Date Telephone Number

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
,? • z z 2y Lv/h
DIVISION ONE DISTRICT ONE
CONTRACT PROPOSAL
WORK ORDER NUMBER: 6.049009T PROPOSAL NUMBER: 9850990
ROUTE: US 168
COUNTY: Currituck
DESCRIPTION: Casey Tract Mitigation Site for Wetlands
DATE: July 30. 1997
BID OPENING: August 27.1997
NOTICE:
ALL BIDDERS SHALL COMPLY WTTH ALL APPLICABLE LAWS
REGULATING THE PRACTICE OF GENERAL CONTRACTING AS
CONTAINED IN CHAPTER 87 OF THE GENERAL STATUTES OF NORTH
CAROLINA WHICH REQUIRES THE BIDDER TO BE LICENSED BY THE NC
LICENSING BOARD FOR CONTRACTORS WHEN BIDDING ON ANY NON-
FEDERAL AID PROJECT WHERE THE BID IS $30,000 OR MORE, EXCEPT
FOR CERTAIN SPECIALTY WORK AS DETERMINED BY THE LICENSING
BOARD. BIDDERS SHALL ALSO COMPLY WITH ALL OTHER APPLICABLE
LAWS REGULATING THE PRACTICES OF ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING,
HEATING AND AIR CONDITIONING AND REFRIGERATION CONTRACTING
AS CONTAINED IN CHAPTER 87 OF THE GENERAL STATUTES OF NORTH
CAROLINA.
NAME OF BIDDER
NC CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE NUMBER
ADDRESS OF BIDDER
RETURN BIDS TO:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Division Engineer
P. O. Boa 850
Edenton NC 27932
[phone]
o ?
OF

a
CONTENTS
Instructions to Bidders .....................................................................................................
Standard Provisions
General ......... ....................:............................................................................... 3
Authority of the Engineer ................................................................................... 3
Materials and Testing ............................................................................... 3
Notifications of Operations ............................................................................... 3
Prosecution and Progress ................................................................................ 3
Supervision by Contractor ............................................................................:.. 4
Extension of Contract Time .............................................................................. 4
Subletting of Contract ............................................................................... 4
Contract Payment and Performance Bond ................................................. 4
Default of Contract ............................................................................................. 4
Bankruptcy ............................................................................................. 5
Payment and Retainage ............................................................... 5
Liability Insurance .............................................................................................. 5
Special Provisions
Note to Contractor ............................................................................................ 6
Contract Time and Liquidated Damages ............................................... 6
Floating Tubidity Curtain ............................................................................. 6
Minority and Women Business Enterprises ............................................... 7
General Specifications for the 'Grading Contract' of Wetland Mitigation Site
General Specifications ............................................................................ 10
Site Preparation prior to Grading Operations ..................................................... 10
Access Roads and Haul Roads ............................................................... :......... 10
Grading Operations ....................................................................................... 10
Discing ......................................................................................................... 11
Erosion Control ............................................................................................. 11
Traffic Control ................................................................................................ 11
Utility Easements .......................................................................................... 12
Cooperation Between Contractors .................................................................. 12
Seeding and Mulching .................................................................................... 13
Minority Form ........................................................................................................... 14
Division Contract Bid Form ............................................................................................ 15
INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS
PLEASE READ ALL INSTRUCTIONS CAREFULLY
BEFORE PREPARING AND SUBMITTING YOUR BID.
All bids shall be prepared and submitted in accordance with the following requirements. Failure to
comply with any requirement shall cause the bid to be considered irregular and shall be grounds for
rejection of the bid.
1. The bid sheet furnished by NCDOT with the proposal shall be used and shall not be altered in any
manner. Do not separate the bid sheet from the Proposal!
2. All entries on the bid sheet, including signatures, shall be written in ink.
3. The Bidder shall submit a unit price for every item on the bid form. The unit prices for the various
contract items shall be written in figures.
4. An amount bid shall be entered on the bid sheet for every item. The amount bid for each item shall
be determined by multiplying each unit bid by the quantity for that item, and shall be written in
figures in the "Amount Bid" column of the sheet.
5. The total amount bid shall be written in figures in the proper place on the bid sheet. The total
amount shall be determined by adding the amounts bid for each item.
6. Changes in any entry shall be made by marking through the entry in ink and making the correct entry
adjacent thereto in ink. A representative of the Bidder shall initial the change in ink.
7. The bid shall be properly executed. All bids shall show the following information:
a. Name of individual, firm, corporation, partnership, or joint venture submitting bid.
b. Name of individual or representative submitting bid and position or title.
c. Name, signature, and position or title of witness.
d. Federal Identification Number
e. Contractor's License Number
8. Bids submitted by corporations shall bear the seal of the corporation.
9. The bid shall not contain any unauthorized additions, deletions, or conditional bids.
10. The bidder shall not add any provision reserving the right to accept or reject an award, or to enter
into a contract pursuant to an award.
11. THE PROPOSAL WITH THE BID SHEET STILL ATTACHED shall be placed in a sealed envelope
and shall have been delivered to and received in the Division Engineer's Office at 113Airport Drive,
Edenton, NC at 10:30 AM on August 27. 1997 No Faxed bids will be excepted.
12. The sealed bid must display the following statement on the front of the .sealed envelope:
Quotation for Proposal #9850990 in Currituck County
to be opened at 10:30 AM on August 27,1997.
13. If delivered by mail, the sealed envelope shall be placed in another sealed envelope and the outer
envelope shall be addressed as follows:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Division Engineer
P. O. Boa 850
Edenton, NC 27932
AWARD OF CONTRACT
The award of the contract, if it be awarded, will be made to the lowest responsible Bidder. The
lowest responsible will be notified that his bid has been accepted and that he has been awarded the
contract. NCDOT reserves the right to reject all bids.
STANDARD PROVISIONS
GENERAL
This contract is for the work to be performed on the Casey tract mitigation site for wetlands along
US 168 in Currituck County, North Carolina. All work and materials shall be in accordance with the
provisions of the General Guidelines of this contract, the Project Special Provisions, the North Carolina
Department of Transportation Standard Specifications for Roads and Structures 1995, the North Carolina
Department of Transportation Roadway Standard Drawings, and the current edition of the Manual of
Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD).
The Contractor shall keep himself fully informed of all Federal, State and local laws, ordinances,
and regulations, and shall comply with the provisions of Section 107 of the Standard Specifications.
AUTHORITY OF THE ENGINEER
The Engineer for this project shall be the Division Engineer, Division One, Division of
Highways, North Carolina Department of Transportation, acting directly or through his duly authorized
representatives.
The Engineer will decide all questions which may arise as to the quality and acceptability of
work performed and as to the rate of progress of the work; all questions which may arise as to the
interpretation of the contract; and all questions as to the acceptable fulfillment of the contract on the part
of the Contractor. His decision shall be final and he shall have executive authority to enforce and make
effective such decisions and orders as the Contractor fails to carry out promptly.
MATERIALS AND TESTING
The Engineer reserves the right to perform all sampling and testing in accordance with Section
106 of the Standard SMifications and the Department's "Materials and Test Manual." However the
Engineer may reduce the frequency of sampling and testing where he deems it appropriate for the project
under construction.
The Contractor shall furnish the applicable certifications and documentation for all materials as
required by the Standard Specifications. Material which is not properly certified will not be accepted.
NOTIFICATION OF OPERATIONS
The Contractor shall notify the Engineer five (5) working days in advance of beginning work on
this project. The Contractor shall give the Engineer sufficient notice of all operations for any sampling,
inspection or acceptance testing required.
PROSECUTION AND PROGRESS
The Contractor shall pursue the work diligently with workmen in sufficient numbers, abilities,
and supervision, and with equipment, materials, and methods of construction as may be required to
complete the work described in the contract by the completion date and in accordance with Section 108 of
the Standard Specifications.
The Contractor's operations are restricted to daylight hours. No work may be performed on
Sundays and legal State holidays. Work shall only be performed when weather and visibility conditions
allow safe operations.
SUPERVISION BY CONTRACTOR
At all times during the life of the project the Contractor shall provide one permanent employee
who shall have the authority and capability for overall responsibility of the project and who shall be
personally available at the work site within 24 hours notice. Such employee shall be fully authorized to
conduct all business with the subcontractors, to negotiate and execute all supplemental agreements, and to
execute the orders or directions of the Engineer.
At all times that work is actually being performed, the Contractor shall have present on the
project one competent individual who is authorized to act in a supervisory capacity over all work on the
project, including work subcontracted. The individual who has been so authorized shall be experienced in
the type of work being performed and shall be fully capable of managing, directing, and coordinating the
work; of reading and thoroughly understanding the contract; and receiving and carrying out directions
from the Engineer or his authorized representatives. He shall be an employee of the Contractor unless
otherwise approved by the Engineer.
The Contractor may, at his option, designate one employee to meet the requirements of both
positions. However, whenever the designated employee is absent from the work site, an authorized
individual qualified to act in a supervisory capacity on the project shall be present.
EXTENSION OF CONTRACT TIME
Failure on the part of the Contractor to furnish bonds or certifications, or to satisfy preliminary
requirements necessary to issue the purchase order will not constitute grounds for extension of the
contract time. If the Contractor has fulfilled all preliminary requirements for the issuance of a purchase
order, and the purchase order authorization is not available by the date of availability, the Contractor shall
be granted an extension equal to the number of calendar days the purchase order authorization is delayed
after the date of availability.
SUBLETTING OF CONTRACT
The Contractor shall not sublet, sell, transfer, assign or otherwise dispose of this contract or any
portion thereof, or his right, title, or interest therein; without written consent of the Engineer. Subletting
of this contract or any portion of the contract shall conform to the requirements of Article of 108-6 of the
Standard Specifications.
CONTRACT PAYMENT AND PERFORMANCE BOND
A performance bond in the amount of one hundred percent (100%) of the contract amount,
conditioned upon the faithful performance of the contract in accordance with specifications and conditions
of the contract is required for contracts of $50,000 or more. Such bond shall be solely for the protection of
the North Carolina Department of Transportation and the State of North Carolina.
A payment bond in the amount of one hundred percent (100%) of the contract amount,
conditioned upon the prompt payment for all labor or materials for which the Contractor, or his
subcontractors, are liable is required for this project. The payment bond shall be solely for the protection
of persons or firms furnishing materials or performing labor for this contract for which the Contractor is
liable.
DEFAULT OF CONTRACT
The Department of Transportation shall have the right to declare a default of contract for breach
by the Contractor of any material term or condition of the contract. Default of contract shall be in
accordance with the terms, conditions, and procedures of Article 108-9 of the Standard Specifications.
4
BANKRUPTCY
The Department of Transportation, at its option, may terminate the contract upon the filing by
the contractor of any petition for protection under the provisions of the Federal Bankruptcy Act
PAYMENT AND RETAINAGE
The Contractor may submit a requests for partial payment on a monthly basis, or other interval as
approved by the Engineer. The amount of partial payments will be based on the work accomplished and
accepted as the last day of the approved pay period. All requests for payment shall be made on the form
furnished to the Contractor by the Department of Transportation. The form shall be completely and
legibly filled out with all appropriate information supplied and shall be signed by an authorized
representative of the Contractor. Minority Business (MB) and Women's Business (WB) participation
shall be listed in the appropriate spaces on all requests for payment. If there is no participation the word
"None" or the figure "0" shall be entered. An amount equal to five percent (5%) of the total amount due
on the partial pay estimate will be deducted and retained until after the final inspection. One hundred
percent (1001/o) payment shall be made after successful completion of the work as verified by the final
inspection.
LIABILITY INSURANCE
The Contractor shall obtain from an insurance company, duly authorized to do business in North
Carolina, Public Liability and Property Damage Insurance to protect his company and subcontractors
performing work covered under this contract from claims which may arise from operations under this
contract. Insurance coverage shall be maintained during the life of this contract and shall extend to
operations performed by the Contractor or his subcontractors, and by anyone employed directly or
indirectly by either of them.
Public Liability Insurance shall be in an amount not less than $1,000,000 for injuries, including
accidental death, to any one person, and subject to the same limit for each person, in an amount not less
than $1,000,000 on account of one accident. Property Damage Insurance shall be in an amount not less
than $1,000,000. Proof of insurance shall be furnished to the Engineer prior to beginning work.
SPECIAL PROVISIONS
NOTE TO CONTRACTOR
A planting project will follow completion of this project. Completion of the work
outlined in this bid proposal by the completion date is critical due to a planting season deadline
for the subsequent planting activities.
CONTRACT TIME AND LIQUIDATED DAMAGES
The date of availability, for this project is September 5 1997 . The Contractor may begin work prior to
this date upon approval of the Engineer or his duly authorized representative. If such approval is given,
and the Contractor begins work prior to the date of availability, the Department of Transportation will
assume no responsibility for any delays caused prior to the date of availability by any reason whatsoever,
and such delays, if any, will not constitute a valid reason for extending the completion date. No work will
be permitted and no purchase order will be issued until all required bonds and prerequisite conditions and
certifications have been satisfied. The completion date for this project is December 12, 1997. No
extensions will be authorized except as authorized by Article 108-10 of the Standard Specifications.
Liquidated damages for this contract are $500.00 (five hundred dollars) per calendar day.
Any claims for additional compensation and/or extensions of the completion date shall be
submitted to the Division Engineer with detailed justification within thirty (30) days after receipt of final
invoice payment. The failure of the Contractor to submit the claim(s) within thirty (30) days shall be a
bar to recovery.
Floating Turbidity Curtain
The Contractor shall install a floating turbidity curtain as detailed in the plans. The
curtain shall be constructed at locations shown on the plans as directed by the engineer to deter
silt suspension and movement of silt particles. The curtain material shall be made of a tightly
woven nylon, plastic or other non-deteriorating material meeting the following specifications:
Pro e
Grab Tensile Strength
Mullen Burst Strength
Trapezoid Tear Strength
Apparent Opening Size
Percent Open Area
Permittivity
unit
lbs
psi
lbs
US Standard Sieve
90
sec-1
Value
*370(MD), 250(CD)
480
-100(MD), 60(CD)
70(0.210 mm)
4
0.28
*MD - Machine Direction
*CD - Cross Machine Direction
In the event that more than one width of fabric is required, a six inch overlap of the material
shall also be required.
The curtain shall be supported by a floatation material having over 29 lbs/ft buoyancy.
The floating curtain shall have a 5/16 inch galvanized chain as a ballast, and dual 5/16 inch
galvanized wire ropes with a heavy vinyl coating as load lines.
The floating turbidity curtain shall be maintained in a satisfactory condition by the
contractor until its removal is requested by the engineer.
6
The quantity of floating turbidity curtain to be paid for under this item shall be the
actual number of square yards of curtain installed as specified and accepted.
The quantity of floating turbidity curtain as measured above will be paid for at the
contract unit price per square yard for the "Floating Turbidity Curtain". Such price and
payment will be full compensation for the work as described in the above paragraphs including,
but not limited to furnishing all materials, tools, equipment, and all incidentals necessary to
complete the work
NIINORITY AND WOMEN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES
Policy
It is the policy of the North Carolina Department of Transportation that minority and women business
enterprises shall have the maximum opportunity to participate in the performance of contracts financed by
Non-Federal Funds.
Obligation
The Contractor and any subsequent Subcontractor shall ensure that minority and women business
enterprises have the maximum opportunity to participate in the performance of the work included in this
contract. The Contractor and any subsequent contractor shall take all necessary and reasonable steps to
ensure that minority and business enterprises have the maximum opportunity to compete for and perform
a portion of the work included in the contract Failure on the part of the Contractor to carry out the
requirements set forth herein shall constitute a breach of contract and after proper notification, may result
in award disqualification, termination of the contract, disqualification from bidding, or other appropriate
remedy.
Goals
Pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 136-28.4, the following goals are
established for this contract:
Minimum Minority Business 5%
Minimum Women Business 2%
i
The Contractor shall exercise all necessary and reasonable steps to ensure that Minority Businesses (MB)
and Women Businesses (WB) participate in at least the percents of the contract as set forth above as goals
for this contract.
Listing of MB and WB Subcontractors
All bidders, at the time the bid proposal is submitted, must also submit a listing of MB and WB
participation on the appropriate form (or facsimile thereof) contained in this proposal in order for the bid
to be considered responsive.
Only those MB and WB firms with current certification by the Department will be considered acceptable
for listing in the bidder's submittal of MB and WB participation.
A listing of Minority Businesses (MB) and Women Businesses (WB) which have been certified as such by
the Department will be available from the Division Engineer upon request.
In the event the bidder has no MB and WB participation, he is still required to indicate this on the forms
by entering the word or number zero in order for the bid to be considered responsive.
The listing of an individual firm certified by the Department shall not be construed as an endorsement of
the firm's capability to perform certain work
The Contractor shall indicate on the form for the listing of MB and WB Subcontractors the
following required information:
1) The names of MB and WB firms committed to participate in the contract;
2) The contract item numbers and agreed upon unit prices of work to be performed by each MB and
WB firm; and
3) The total dollar amount to be paid to each MB and WB based on the agreed upon unit prices.
Failure to indicate the required information on the specified form may cause the bid to be
considered nonresponsive and it may be rejected.
The Department will not allow any substitutions, deletions, or other alterations to the listing of
firms committed for MB and WB participation and/or the respective listed contract item numbers
after the opening of bids. The Department will not allow adjustments to the total dollar amount
of MB and WB participation after the opening of bids which would result in the MB and WB
participation being less than the contract goal. The only exceptions to the requirements of this
paragraph will be: (1) to allow replacement of a MB or WB firm that had been decertified after
opening of bids, and (2) to allow alteration of the listed contract item numbers subject to the
Bidder submitting sufficient documentation to verify an obvious error in the initial submittal.
B. If the MB and WB participation submitted does not meet or exceed the MB and WB contract goals,
the apparent lowest responsive bidder must submit information to satisfy the North Carolina Department
of Transportation that sufficient reasonable efforts have been made to meet the contract goals. This
information must be received in the office of the Division Engineer no later than 12:00 noon of the sixth
day following the opening of the bids. Where the bidder fails to provide this information by the deadline,
the Department may impose the following sanctions:
1) Disqualify the Contractor and any affiliated companies from further bidding for a period of no more
than 90 days from the date of disqualification as established in notification by certified mail.
2) Disqualify the Contractor and any affiliated companies for award of all contracts for which bids have
been received and opened.
The following factors are what the Department will consider in judging whether or not the bidder
has made adequate good faith effort:
1) Whether the bidder attended any pre-bid meetings that were scheduled by the Department to
inform MBs and WBs of subcontracting opportunities.
2) Whether the bidder provided written notice to a reasonable number of specific MBs and WBs that
their interest in the contract is being solicited, and whether the firms solicited could have
reasonably been expected to quote the work in the contract.
3) Whether the bidder followed up initial solicitations of interests by contacting MBs and WBs to
determine with certainty whether they were interested.
4) Whether the bidder selected portions of the work to be performed by MBs and WBs in order to
increase the likelihood of meeting the contract goals.
5) Whether the bidder provided interested MBs and WBs with adequate information about the
plans, specifications and requirements of the contract.
6) Whether the bidder excluded interested MBs and WBs from the bidding process, not rejecting
them as unqualified without sound reasons based on a thorough investigation of their capabilities.
7) Whether quotations were received from interested MB and WB firms but rejected as unacceptable
without sound reasons why the quotations were considered unacceptable.
8) Whether the bidder made efforts to assist interested MBs and WBs in obtaining any required I
insurance or bonding that may be required by the bid proposal or by the bidder.
9) Whether the bidder specifically negotiated with Subcontractors to assume part of the
responsibility to meet the contract MB and WB goal when the work to be sublet includes potential for
MB and WB participation.
Where the apparent lowest responsive bidder fails to submit sufficient participation by MB and WB firms
to meet the contract goal, and upon a determination by the Engineer based upon the information
submitted that the apparent lowest responsive bidder failed to make adequate good faith efforts to meet the
contract goal, the Department may reject the bid.
In the event that the Department does not award the contract to the apparent lowest responsive bidder, the
Department reserves the right to award the contract to the next lowest responsive bidder that can satisfy
the Department that the contract goal can be met or that adequate good faith efforts have been made to
meet the goal.
Replacement of MBs and WBs
If any MB or WB Subcontractor indicated on the form for listing of MB and WB Subcontractors and
contained elsewhere in this proposal form does not perform satisfactorily to the extent indicated or
anticipated, the Contractor shall take all necessary, reasonable steps to replace the MB Subcontractor with
another MB Subcontractor and/or the Contractor shall take all necessary, reasonable steps to replace the
WB Subcontractor with another WB Subcontractor.
Any substitutions of MB or WB firms after award of the contract shall be approved by the Department.
The Contractor shall submit any requests for substitutions in writing to the Engineer and the request must
provide a valid basis or reason for the proposed substitution.
Failure of the Contractor to demonstrate reasonable efforts to replace a MB or WB firm that does not
perform as intended or anticipated, shall be just cause to disqualify the Contractor from further bidding for
a period of up to 6 months after notification by certified mail.
Counting MBA" Participation Toward Meeting MB/WB Goal
MB and WB participation shall be counted toward meeting the MB and WB goal in this contract as
follows:
1) If a firm is determined to be an eligible MB or WB firm and certified by the Department, the
total dollar value of the participation by the MB or WB will be counted toward the
appropriate MB or WB goal. The total dollar value of certified MB or WB will be based
upon unit prices agreed upon by the Prime Contractor and MB or WB Subcontractor.
2) A Contractor may count toward its MB or WB goal 60 percent of its expenditures for
materials and supplies required to complete the contract and obtained from MB or WB
regular dealer, and 100 percent of such expenditures to a MB or WB manufacturer.
Reports
The Contractor shall submit a statement with the final invoice to report all MB and WB participation on
the project. In the event the Contractor had no MB or WB participation on the project, he is still required
to submit a statement with the final invoice reporting no participation. Where participation is from MB
and WB Material Suppliers or Manufacturers, the statement shall indicate the appropriate percentage
(60% for regular dealers and 100% for manufacturers ) of expenditures to be reported.
THE CONTRACTOR'S STATEMENT OF MB AND WB PARTICIPATION MUST BE DELIVERED
TO THE DEPARTMENT IN ORDER FOR THE FINAL INVOICE TO BE PROCESSED FOR
PAYMENT.
9
General Specifications for the "Grading Contract"
of Casey Tract Wetland Mitigation Site
A. General Specifications
1. Contractor shall not utilize a borrow pit that is located within 112 mile of any boundary of a NCDOT
wetland mitigation site, if excavation in the borrow pit will fall below the highest elevation of the nearby
mitigation site.
2. No excavated material other than that shown in the plans shall be taken from the mitigation site unless
directed by the Engineer.
3. Any damage to existing installed monitoring wells, rain gauges, water level gauges, stream gauges, or
any other gauge type, to hydraulic control structures, or to prior vegetative plantings shall be remedied by
the contractor prior to completion of work, as directed by the Engineer.
4. There is no subsurface information available for this project. The contractor shall make his own
investigation of subsurface conditions.
5. Contractor is responsible for clearing any fallen trees that lie within construction limits, as directed by
the Engineer.
B. Site Preparation prior to Grading Operations
1. Clearing and Grubbing
a. Clearing and grubbing operations shall be performed to the limits shown on the plans and as
directed by the Engineer. Clearing and grubbing will be paid for at a contract unit price per
acre.
b. Burning restrictions:
1. On-site burning of clearing and grubbing material is allowed; the contractor is
responsible for obtaining all necessary permits.
2. Debris and waste material shall be disposed of off site at a location to be determined
by the contractor. A Reclamation Plan will be required in accordance with Section
802 of the Standard Specifications.
C. Access Roads and Haul Roads
1. Access to the project site shall be limited to the designated routes and locations that are depicted on the
plan sheets.
2. Damage to any existing access road shall be repaired to a condition which is at least as good as the
road condition before start of construction, as directed by the Engineer.
D. Grading Operations
1. The contractor shall perform grading as shown in the plans and attached cross-sections. Final grades
shall meet the grading plan and cross sections within a tolerance of + 1 inches.
2. Removal of organic material is not necessary in graded areas.
10
3. All work covered by the provision will be paid for at the contract unit price for "unclassified
excavation" and "drainage ditch excavation". Drainage ditch excavation covers the work involved in
constructing proposed tributaries to the main channel.
4. Compaction shall not be performed for graded areas unless otherwise directed by the Engineer.
G. Discim
1. Discina
Discing shall be performed in all areas as directed by the Engineer. The disc harrow equipment shall be
either a tandem disc harrow or an offset disc harrow with 20-inch blades (minimum) spaced a maximum
of 9 inches apart. The disc harrow shall have a minimum of 18 blades, and shall be of sufficient weight
and size to provide the eight (8) inch minimum cutting depth and mixing of vegetation debris. The
tractor used to perform this work shall be of sufficient size and horsepower capable of pulling this
implement to the minimum specifications stated above.
2. Method of Measurement
The quantity of discing to be paid for will be the actual number of acres, measured along the surface of the
ground, which have been disced.
3. Basis of Pavment
The quantity of discing, measured as provided for above, will be paid for at the contract unit price per
acre for "Discing."
Payment will be made under:
Discing ................................................................................... Acre
H. Erosion Control
The contractor will utilize an erosion control plan in accordance with details on plan sheets, as
directed by the Engineer. The Contractor shall exercise every reasonable precaution throughout the life of
the project to prevent erosion and siltation. Silt fence and erosion control measures shall be installed in
accordance with the plans for this project, Division 16 of the Standard Specifications, and in locations
directed by the Engineer or his representative. All erosion control items, except "Floating Turbidity
Curtain" shall be incidental to the cost of the project.
1. Traffic Control
1. Marking of Non-Disturbance Areas
To limit disturbance of soils on site, the Contractor shall restrict the movement of all construction
equipment to the allowable areas shown on plans. Prior to construction activities, the Contractor shall
identify the boundaries of all non-disturbance areas by using a highly visible tape, silt fencing, or orange
boundary fencing, and will stake the limits of where construction equipment is permitted to travel, as
directed by the Engineer.
2. Roadwav Traffic Concerns
The Contractor shall maintain traffic during construction and provide, install, and maintain all
traffic control devices in accordance with these project guidelines, the Project Special Provisions, North
Carolina Department of Transportation Standard Specifications for Roads and Structures 1995, the
Roadway Standard Drawings 1995. and the current edition of the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control
Devices (MUTCD).
The Contractor shall utilize complete and proper traffic controls and traffic control devices
during all operations. All traffic control and traffic control devices required for any operation shall be
functional and in place prior to the commencement of that operation. Signs for temporary operations
shall be removed during periods of inactivity. The Contractor is required to leave the project in a manner
that will be safe to the traveling public and which will not impede motorists. All signs shall be provided
and maintained by the Contractor as in Section 1105 of the Standard Specifications.
In situations where sight distance is limited, the Contractor shall provide additional means of
controlling traffic, including, but not limited to, two-way radios, pilot vehicles, or additional Faggers.
Flaggers shall be competent personnel, adequately trained in flagging procedures, and furnished with
proper safety devices and equipment, including, but not limited to, safety vests and stop/slow paddles.
All personnel when working in traffic areas or areas in close proximity to traffic shall wear an
approved safety vest, or shirt or jacket which meets the color requirements of the Manual of Uniform
Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD).
The Contractor shall comply with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, ordinances, and
regulations governing safety, health, and sanitation, and shall provide all safeguards, safety devices, and
protective equipment, and shall take any other needed actions, on his own responsibility that are
reasonably necessary to protect the life and health of employees on the job and the safety of the public,
and to protect property in connection with the performance of the work covered by the contram
Failure to comply with any of the requirements for safety and traffic control of this contract shall
result in suspension of work as provided in subarticle 108-7(2) of the Standard Specifications.
3. Payment
Payment of marking boundaries shall be incidental to the price of the contract.
I. Utility Easements
It shall be the responsibility of the Contractor to contact all affected utility owners and determine
the precise locations of all utilities prior to beginning construction. Utility owners shall be contacted a
minimum of 48 hours prior to the commencement of operations. Special care shall be used in working
around or near existing utilities, protecting them when necessary to provide uninterrupted service. In the
event that any utility service is interrupted, the Contractor shall notify the utility owner immediately and
shall cooperate with the owner, or his representative, in the restoration, of service in the shortest time
possible. Existing fire hydrants shall be kept accessible to fire departments at all times.
The Contractor shall adhere to all applicable regulations and follow accepted safety procedures when
working in the vicinity of utilities in order to insure the safety of construction personnel and the public.
K. Cooperation Between Contractors
In accordance with Section 105-7 of the Standard Specifications, the Department reserves the
right at any time to contract for and perform other or additional work on or near the work covered by the
contract. Widening of NC 168 adjacent to the wetland mitigation site is currently underway.
When separate or additional contracts are let within the limits of any one project, each Contractor
shall conduct his work so as not to interfere with or hinder the progress or completion of the work being
performed by other Contractors. Contractors working within the limits of the same project shall cooperate
with each other.
Each Contractor shall conduct his operations in such a manner as to avoid damaging any work
being performed by others or which has been completed by others.
When a project is let under more than one contract and the plans and/or special provisions
include a construction schedule, it shall be the responsibility of the Contractors to complete the various
phases of the project in accordance with the time limits specified such that the total contracts will be
completed by the completion date. This construction schedule will remain in effect until such time as the
12
a
Contractors at their option submit to the engineer a joint construction schedule meeting the approval of
the Engineer. This joint construction schedule shall be signed by authorized representatives of each firm
and upon the approval of the Engineer shall be binding on each Contractor and made a part of the
contract documents. Subsequent modificaitons to the joint construction schedule may be made during the
course of the work in the same manner.
Failure of the Contractor(s) to complete the various phases of work within the time limits set
forth in the construction schedule or latest approved joint construction schedule shall be just cause for
removing the Contractor(s) from the Department's list of qualified bidders. A Contractor disqualified
from bidding by reason of this provision will not be reinstated until such time as his progress is in
accordance with the latest approved construction schedule or until the project is completed and accepted,
whichever occurs first.
The Department will under no circumstances be liable for any claim for additional compensation
due to acts of one Contractor holding up the work of another.
The Department will under no circumstances be liable for any damages experienced by one
Contractor as a result of the presence and operations of other Contractors working within the limits of the
same project.
L. Seeding and Mulching
The normal Seeding and Mulching Specifications in Section 880 should be followed as directed
by the Engineer. But the kinds of seed and fertilizer, and the rates of application of seed, fertilizer, and
limestone, shall be as stated below. During periods of overlapping dates, the kind of seed to be used shall
be determined by the Engineer. All rates are in pounds per acre.
January 1 - December 31
20# Switchgrass
20# German or Browntop Millet
500# Fertilizer
4000# Limestone
Approved Tall Fescue Cultivars:
Waste and Borrow Locations:
Januarv 1 - December 31
75# Tall Fescue
50# Pensacola Bahiagrass
500# Fertilizer
4000# Limestone
Adventure Appache Appache II Arid Brookstone Bonanza
Bonanza II Chesapeake Chieftan Crosseire II Debutane Falcon
Finelawn Finelawn II Finelawn Petite Genesis Grande Guardian
Houndog Jaguar Jaguar III Kentucky 31 Mustang Olympic
Pacer Pyramid Rebel Rebel Jr. Rebel II Renegade
Safari Shenandoah Titan Tomahawk Tirbute Wrangler
Fertilizer shall be 10-20-20 analysis. Upon written approval of the Engineer, a different analysis of
fertilizer may be used provided the 1-2-2 ratio is maintained and the rate of application adjusted to
provide the same amount of plant food as a 10-20-20 analysis.
13

o z
0
rA
4- a N

m
O oo
A ?azoA?
°a
?v
? z
v
°
F

A
Wa
3

r7 'V'
G wl?WUWFT"
W
p E.,p?paa0
z
0
°
>a 3F?

d z
z3
U
04Z w

Wa
94
"?
W
W
W?
-1Q
9AW W
E'
=0 Z=zz

O
F

V1
W
A
?
H

z U U
F
'" a a
A
Op?gOW
?°3 ?HFF

O z
Z

' `
(
im o
o
A U A U
v w, rn

A Coco
c
oo
?z wwwW
aw
? oWoW
z d a
ww
?
aa
a
OAOA
A3A?
3
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT
(Division/Purchase Order Contracts)
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT NO: WORK ORDER NO: 6 .049009T
COUNTY: Currituck FEDERAL AID NO:
CONTRACTOR Michael D. Neal & Asso. , Inc. VENDOR NO:
CONTRACT NO. a1m nA9 PURCHASE ORDER NO.
1. Description, location, and justification for change:
rh?nno nnA Oho hxic of navmPnt•
Line
No.
Description
Unit Negotiated
Price
Quantity Amount
2 Marsh Grass On Casev AC 4.14 4
1 H rr won( Seeds o 0 Tilckp- d
7
98 5 0 7 5
I

I I
I I I
Total: 24,199.96
3. Extension of contract time (if applicable).
BASIS OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION AND THE CONTRACTOR
1. The Contractor agrees to perform the work described in the Supplemental Agreement in consideration of the
payment set out herein.
2. The terms and conditions of said contract are hereby ratified and remain in full force and effect except as modified
by such Supplemental Agreement(s) as may heretofore have been entered into between the Department and the
Contractor and as modified by this Supplemental Agreement.
3. All terms and conditions of this Supplemental Agreement are herein set out and there are no agreements relating
thereto not expressed herein.
4. This Supplemental Agreement shall not constitute a release or waiver of any lawful claims that the Contractor has or
may have against the Department under said contract pursuant to G. S. 136-29 except for the matters specifically
covered herein.
In witness whereof, the Department and the Contractor have caused this Supplemental Agreement to be
executed by their duly authorized representatives.
APPROVAL RECOMMENDED
BY: _Zr"
TITLE: i? . /Z
DATE: ? ?? - 7 S
APPROVAL GRANTED
DIVISION
ENGINEER
cc: CONLNERCIAL ACCOUNTS
August 1995
DATE:
Filename: SUPAGREE.DOC
CW-4
UW1TS Of C0lSTRUC77101-\\
CASEY T RACT
CW-2
MONITORING WELL LOCATIONS
X Y
GW-1 2860556.108 996680.427
GW-2 2860507.524 996604.215
GW-5 2860662.585 996572.276
I
GW-4 2860775.101 996607.842
GW-5 2860851.254 996599.858
caos?7 WVSUand moll Ullg)E Dom OHS
` \ m
-wLe -CMB
an)
J
LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
\ °2.16 ac.
M
\<r `? PCCSta
it
0.12 ac.
\, I
S
L1M1 S' OF CONSTRUCTION
-L- REV.
P.1. = 456 35.07
A = 35'12'21' RT. l ( 1.12 OC. T
Dc = 0215100' I
L = 1564.70' I
R = 2546.4791' BEGIN CHANNEL
T = 807.93
e = 0.03 FT/FT I I Sta. 10+00.00 = \
` -LREV- Sta.456+26X ((' C a
83J8'(RT)
8. ?cp
1 1 19'RCP ?- - R-71W _ r 2
_ 24' RCP p 46lr_ III Ilse = --- --- ------ -"Ice
-LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION j
? 0,67 ac.
_ o
NEIm
222 '

-r
rr4
P
w•

Wetland Plonting Plan
Zone l: Rush acJ
Common Rusn IJuncus fifususl
Woolgross (Scirpus Cyperlnus)
Zone 2 : U
Sawgrass (Cla lCladlum Jama/cense)
61an1 Cordgrass (Spar:i a Cynasuroldes)
i
15

CURVE (IATA FOR CHANNFI
P1 Sta 12+25J2 P1 Sto 14+89.96 PI Sto 16+14.03 PI Sto 19+33.74 PI Sto 21+58.14
= 12r155' 599' (LT) = IOM' 23.7' (RT) = 18',22' 58.7' (RT) = 102Y7 462' (RT ) = 122105' 329' QT)
D = 7523' 39.7' D = 5Z05'13-5' D = 14'19 265' D = 3x49' 51.3' D = 76 23' 399'
L = 159.61' L = 198.11' L = 128.34' L = 344.94' L = 15992'
T = 135J2' T = 138.76' T = 64.72' T = 256.10' T = 13556'
R = 75.00' R = 110.00' R = 400.00' R = 180.00' R = 750(Y
TI,T2,T3: Vegetation Monitoring Transects (30 ml
TG: Tide Guage
Pl)oto Points
E

??LL,,?r GMg ? ? M Ic 1"'i l\ -CMB?f! Bi ?? `W16? S?B?
VWl?O ACS ??P
A,UJ.rZA,v •J.rZ.I,? a\
V 0.09 cc.
aosCl 11 (SHEnd UlfU 000) E 00@R
I
[+ L W LI IJ U o ng NEE
IJ

\c
M
S\ m
l
e
\ \cMs

-Wla ?
\ ? c e\

I \ caF
4 \ ,? ; LIMITS OF
I CONSTRUCTION
216 0C.

\ \
0.12 ac. 3 "

m 4 -1 111 [i t-
P -
1/ 1"4 , 1 1 I
7

IJNIT5OF CONSTRUCTION

P.,. - 456.35.07
( r
4 - 35'12'21' RT.
Dc : 02'15'00'
/ 0,74 OC. ° i
L = 1564.70'
R = 2546.4791'
T = 807.93'

i

1

1 BEGIN CHANNEL I
}
e :0.03 FT/FT
SIC. 10.00.00 \
-LREV- SIC.456.26JI h'-J ;}
83
38' 1R
.
?

ACP

c
i 7 ACP -
T-
?
e a
P
46 ?? - -
??.
- - -
0

s<'4
•MB ?
i
c
0.09 aC.
1 7
r /
CvA / LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION
- Hy N?d
v "' 0.37 ac. ?
i'
ENANNELm i
a ? ta. •6223/? /
x•02 OC. t ' ; 9.8484 J
7L8 (RT).
's. .6i'r
0.42 cc. -?4CPi
141 1117
ss ro a
_ _ _ _ wr,nC'6eNrac s__oa_E : 450
--_
i I - -24'RCP---?18'ACP
1 _
-L-REV,
`_III II ? 455
PI
D
- (7lRVF DAT A FOR CHANNFI
o 12-25J2
PS5'596'lLTJ
'
' PI SIC
-/03*&2J;r/RTJ -18?5g1lRTJ - 1Ot?i$'46Z(RT) 8'QTJ
-122'05'J2
6
23
397
15961' D • 52'05' 135•
' D • 14'19' 266'
' D • J/495/-r .
D • 7623' J9e

135./2' L • 198JI
T • 13876' L • 128.34
T • 64.72' L 344-94'
T • 25610' L • 15962'
T • 13556'
75.01' R • 110.00' R • 400.00' R • 180.0' r
R . 75 cn'
Wetland- Planting Plan
OP Zone I: lObJ acl
Cammmn Rush rJurc s c'(fususl
woagrass l5clrpus Cyperirusl
Z 2 : (Cl a
Sa
Sawgross fCfaalu
/um Jamaianse)
Ttree-Square lSclrprs Aaerloanus!
Zorx 2 : x216 act
Giant Caragross (Sportlno C/nasurotaes)
NO.
?e
a a
PAYMENT REQUEST
VORK ORDER NO. 6.049009T PARTIAL M
fill To: N.C. Department of Transportation Purchase Order #:
PO Box 1405 , Elizabeth City, NC 27906 Requisition #:
,ontractor's Name and Mailing Address Pay Request No.
:ichael.D. Neal & Associates, Inc.
FINAL a
0 Box 37 Period from: 11-19-97 to 2-1-98
olerain, NC 27924
Contract Number: B301085
Con tract h$24,200.00
FUNC
CODE
LINE
ITEM DESCRIPTION CONTRACT
QUANTITY
UNIT PREVIOUS
QUANTITY CURRENT
QUANTITY TOTAL
QUANTITY UNIT
PRICE TOTAL
AMOUNT
2 Marsh Grass On _
Case Farm AC 0 4.06 4.06 5344. 14
1, 9T

Current Payment To: MB $
WB $
U
Contractor's Authorized Representati
Payment Recommended By:
0
1 oval AmounC LO LSCe 'D G 1 ,_ V 7/ • L 1
Less 0 "'o R etainacre
Less Previous Payments
AMO N D THIS P MENT $ F-21, 697; 21 -?
s?7
(Dale)
Page of
Revised 4/96
'.1
Payreq

CHARGE $151,037.04 To 43401-357-6.049009T-312
Y 4
?
PAYMENT QUE S PAYABLE UPON RECEIPT
RE
WORK ORDER NO. 6.049009T
Bill To: NCDOT P.O. Boa 1405
Elizabeth City, N. C. 27906-1405
Contractor's Name and Mailing Address
Barnhill Contracting Company
130d ITS 17 South
PARTIAL M FINAL
Purchase Order 953416
Requistion 9850990
Pay Request No.
0
1
Period from: Sept. 5, 1997 to Oct 13, 1997
Elizabeth City, North Carolina 27909 Contract Number X114
Contract Amount: $ 148,900.50
FUNC
CODE
LINE
ITEM DESCRIPTION CONTRACT
QUANTITY 1
1 Clearing & Grubbing
Unclassified Excavation 19,600
mina a Ditch Excavation 1.100
Incidental Stone 5
5 Seeding & Mulching I
emoval of Existing Buildings 1
7 iscin
8 loatin Turbidity Curtain 6

Current Payment 10: m" a V.vv
WB $ 0.00
Total Amount to Date $ 151,037.00
Less 0 % Retamage 0.00
Less Anticip. Liq. Dam. 0.00
AMOUNT DUE THIS PAYMENT $
$ is1, a37. 04
Contractor's Authorized Representative: (Date)
Payment Recommended By:
D-/Z? -97
(Date)
Page 1 of 1
Revised 4/96
PREVIOUS CURRENT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL
[NI QUANTITY QUANTITY QUANTITY PRIC AMOUNT
4 .4 500.0 1000.00
.cr .
1.621 1, 6 21 6.20 13 4.050.2()
1.100 1,100 6.20 6.820.00
64
30 0.64 18.50 566.84
n . 950.00 0.00
;a
1
1
800.0
6.800.00
;a 00
65 0.00
wr
,u ) 6 6 .
50.00 1.800.00
PAYRF.Q doc
?1i9198
eexekA I/
woll:-Ilel Ale /.Iaejx? 7<r'-, -10,.r 7??
a1a Con 741 7 7i4 11 "I'll' ? War Gt ?kirT?t /
,000 Gv2 Qr¢. /ID&A j -&t 604 4,OLd 0
TZ1' 7?r ?Ti? c.ar?
TaG?' Q?.aC T/?2 ?InG?Pl /laic C
f
fDK /Five ?iedonr/!? /fly a
1A
.
f -,r1? /P¢r??? ??/,Lec?
,!!{I?I,Pi,?
f! ie ,I I, i n I ?i?c , ??{I: I I?U? I!{:?;?? f!) ,.?In?.iJai u1t711! !l:,pn. ?
?(?
u?.oe???.(l?2?a1
G
.? , .:....,,;::u:::i;,:;,.:,
: .. yell e,.?:::..:-..
h ,i„
+I. .::, ':fr? : it "'.I. ,I,: .? L?.
. I :, ? ' ?:i: ? ?:?! q '. ? i'i ;::7 , k..,: i ?.:. ? rliai.?ii?rfirillva..::. ; ' ? 1 ? ?':?
s ?•?' +.:.II! I ly,:??k'au? d::l:.r:.l a.v? '..: I I lug iii ?k.U?;4!i If i I r.lla,?, i, ::. ?. IL,in:..?,mn.u, i:, ? : I i ? .: ?. ?..:: :. ...... .. .. ...... .... ..... ?:,1
I
r,
;r
..~,r,, ' n; ,
~1'AT[ ATATR PROJRt;T ~6rfitp,NCL N0. 8F~i1' TOTAL N0. 61Ri1'!
,r T , ~ T
• •
' r rrATY MtO1.NQ r,J*rr~oLNa . oae~xuraN
' 6 °049009T
P, E,
i
irk.°'. f.' , ~ '
, , f
f r.
I~,,I,.,<<' r ~ y. „
" :
,'1 r.: ~ a
' , 1)es •rin ion 1. ~f ~
t " , r . ,
1630,03 ~emporar SiIE ~iEch -
I' • , 1630.05 ~em orar
i' ~ - ~ TA
F p , ~ ~ 1605.01 Temporar Si~E Fence - r
, lb 22.01 ~emparar Berme and Slo f--~
• • Y pe Igraine
" ~ • s:;' 1630.01 SiIE Basin e A - 1P
r', • 1630.02 Si]E Basin e '
YP B---...-•-----..•..•------------------------
-'i; . ' 1633.01 Tem orar o • p y ~ ck SiIE Check ~ o YP
' il•, . I; 1633,02 ~em orar o
r^ P Y R ck Silc Check e rP
1634.01 'I'em o p rary Rock SedimenE I~am ~ e 1P
~ 1634.02 ~'e mporary Rock SedimenE I~am
, 7Pe"B-._..
~ ~ ~'r ~ 1635.01 'Rock pipe Inlay SedimenE rap ~ype'f~..•..--------•--•
~ 1635.02 ocd P'
:v • R ipe InleE Sedime nE rap ~'y e'$.----•- P w.
. a, , J 1 ~ 1636.01 Rock ' SiIE Screen
a ,i,~ ~ ' . 1 3 6 0.04 SE111
• ' ~ i ~ a ing 'Basin ~ '
BUCKSKIII~ It i I$ock In1eE SedimenE bra ' P°
. , cows c a , lU~.liK
1632,01 ~ e ~R••.• YP ~ ,
~ ~ a` t I , L a a
~ ' y a 1632.02 ~ o ~R•-- ' YP B
I, J= ; a ~ r
I' a f _ ~ .
'i.A ' 163 © 2,03 R YP C
r , ' ,
w11/ 7~ f 1, S'~ Z~2
ll ,l
lf' F ~?W` ll
J
~~~i ~ IY 1 I( ~ 4 1~ r•
~d ~'},w, ~'1 y,;ar , ~1 ~ F F r,v rl ~ k I , l -;1 a , ~ ~`,t, V ~ ~ ~ ~ .
' ~ ~IG ~ ,r I~~` d ~ I' r r 1~ i~~
t~ ~ ,~i~~ a.r I t(y~ f ~ ?Y t
I~~il~ ~ ~ a4w, 'i h ~ 1 ,r . • l k
I
,1.,' v , 1 '
• ' r h, ~ \ \ ~ C ra 1 , / .r - f , , G , . ~ r 1 1 r
f 1 ~ / \ / ~ \ ~ t y y ~ / ~ .
•
!n,
/ ~ i 1 I ~'yf, 4 I r \ r . ~ ,r . ,
I ~ 4 ~~l,°• I I
„ I ~ r ~ ~I ,
I.: • ~ ~
:d' ~ IMI
r., - i I . ` f • { { ~0 V ~
I I ~ Ixl
~ ~ 1 I L r', {
~ J I J
i•~! ''i ~ 1
~ ~ ,
1 '
.rI' , / I,r ~1'1• ~ I
J ;f i.:~: •f, . ;
r~%,:u' '~'Ir ~F
"1 1 - , ~ r I
rill I r' '
i7 G' ..~F lr r ''l~ I ~i• ~ ~li,r F IP. F ~
Pre red In t fl
r ~ •Pr}. i~ ra. ' ~ ~r.lr~ J4 ~ r ~ W he ~f ce of;
~ 1 ~ , ~ Wit.. ,
rc~ ~i ~•,''.u '.~i,t-~rf'}. "r' L- l ~ lv iti , r r A. _ f Lf~}[+/'#^,t,~'. >r,. Pa ',Ai,'ri~,~ ~ irL' r'r'r ~a t y 'y ` t - ~ ~ r . du ii' };f_ ~'k. T1 ~.r 4 ~~:rr J-y, 'fit, 4; R i , 4, ,hr:~: _ , •
"t' .!Y~1ti` h,l Iti~ ~.%f >~;'"r+ y' . ~ ~ Y~' f~- ~r ~ iM . ) .i'' , . r , IE(~ Y ~'i ~ ' ~ ~ Y~ 'llp r.^ ,.•t.:' I ,~N.'~ ;J. r rl r r . ~ : y .I~' ~ , .
f.a i 1 ,~t2. ;y., i. ,,.~y~,~p~' ~~j~',I,~, Ll.f .~'=•s. ~i rr r,: tii i:, I ' ~f - I ~f .,.r r~~.- '1~~ J;`" `i.r,t'`1{ ~'%;R ? a:A'. ~~I~'CI !r% ~7 r. .I r,t(t.p I y. J*. ;>Z„F ~r i~~ t, ~ r,~ ",l~ ~ J :1 l :ir7 $.:N: .bl'r`'hF i` if ti 1 71 .r. , ' ~ I -
,e r e, o. c. M' .C. 1 '+1 . '1~~ ~1' '1 a~\ p .c'i T' ' i ~ h 1 i.l. 1 .'t. a~ , t ~ [ x, r ..tit. +f~' 1 r, 'r ( . a :r ~ r r r't',~ t• ~ ~ .mot "'i" .r„,. .o' •7. t • ~ -l i • y ti~' "Y' ~ ~1 -n , l ~ 1 r' F 0 ,r. f ',1 i' r'r' t fir' f. •S t? 1r. •N. ~•r .f. Ir •K' ~.v• r_.v.'Ci. 'P r :,~d' >r, dr t~ .r, Y~' .a Y I r ~ ~ U~ ~f' M r l 1' 1 r.
~~'2.N'~ !~y n., .,r 'J , .r a ~ / : , . < J. . J,,. Via' i r'• , J it -e-. T t, r y ti~ y I• e ~ .t', I, 'j 1' r , e ~ l(~~ ':fir ~1. f~ ~~I 1.. i ~ t» l ;'ti 1•1~~ ~i~ a') .qi+' 3 • t +t' ~ h i ' ^,X JAI ~ "tn t ti ti I•'' , r S"' 7 ~ i • 'rv.'' y °w?~. •,r c 1~.~, w 1~ ` ~ r't + r f 1 / 1" J''S• ,J„ i Y~., ~'1 ,.l ,1 41 ~ I ~.J rw~ 7 r,r 1 •II .1 ~.J', II 1'. fit' it ;lr•i~ ti, ~ 7 ; ( ~ ~ i art.. '
i ~.+'V'j~' .t: •I h .{yJ.' L ,~~,.:~'Y. , M .t~T' ,i:.t. sd"., rl r.u~.. ,"v:4 'r )at r Yr -a: uf. 'irr tl -I r•~~. I ,I. v 'r F ,alk >r •q; ~ i. I 4. -nK~ .r., a.rr rqr ;.n .r,.,, ,(,Y Ir. ,a s• 1i -'A,. .r, r; -5•.• r x, r mot. h i, , r ` o. N~~ { f ~'.rn' 7.`' ~ 11. .,I . r r .'h'':,t •.i. ' T ' 1, ,y {..r r r~~ _f q a „1. I t i .;y; .a, Tr. r.~ J ` ( 1 I • 'I' 'i ~'r. 1 x} 1. s t~ '1 r'!: ~1 n' n~' . ~s•, ; 4•r l
1 1 I+a.e 1 r FI ~j ,I~ ' t r•. aJt•: ~ a l..! h X r ,'r4, ',-f f ~h y I J' 1 i! ~1 'r''. ll f ~ . P I lf' , .r d V r . i , ,k '4. . 't t c ~ ' t 0'I• , 4~` ~ ~~f 'Y ~ 1.t` rJ rs,,. ~{r 11 r I•,.. :.'4 'r..l (V. lr "i~. r. 1 , I~' r '-0 r' r1 I, •.t. -1. • I. I. , I" i~C. J. ' f't r q , f( Ll` .f .•I ,L' 1. fY °n ' Jp~ r . I y ~ 1 ; r ' Y r ] i r 1 ' cc t~'• 'L• 1.r 4 + ',`,~'•~'~I..jik~'. i~; 1' 't.- r'f ; ~•r '•T1, ~ r ~'r 1 I. J{. 1 ; r1 . ~f ,it T.'~' ~ r. r r rn'~ n ~A : - r, . rf.. . y,,, . +r~'', ".'J. • (r '7, ,l ,~'U.,..•:~. , N'' . 6r I L 1 1 -•rt i rV, A '•1 yr )k' 1 lfl y:. { r ~ ~ y ~ ~ , i r.j' y i~ ~ Y~ ''f ~,r 1~ r'',\ 1., ,.1, ,,•tir t... r` r \ 1 r:'7~t'• t.
~r ~ r 1. r }/p^:J I~,~ 7 '4Y, :v ~,'r••` o .t~.' Fr ;,e.• ) t,~„ I p, ,.i.' V r li. 9",'iF 'r t~ r- i ih.. , r ti p ~'1 '.`Y ..n r. .,f.... I .4' (+~tn1; E ,r:. l' I r'~ X'~.J.. 1'MJ, v~h f~"•r „i .T'. :-t:' r 1+ } ''r' ,r •I yl~ . n iG I ~ ~ ~ . T; ~ r . . l > ~ , .+uc"' J,~^r.. II , 1", . h ~ t ~ " r• °,I, / fL`r. ..,I ' v' r'r 1 ~ ~ rf ~ . •~`.4' 1 a, ~r'r~ . ,I. ~ , r'~' / :'r'7•',r' 1..+ - :Nf,r J'~ar, • - ,IV tr• ' ',It.,l , . E ~i 'y. , H ally ~ r ,+r` !Ma. ~S .,v ( 1~ r,,#'~ f`t q~~ 4 •Itr' ,.4A .~u1 , r . 'r`, rr : r... .4M, n. 'I ~ rrr '.y.. pr.h` '+/f1l',~~"r ~r• r~.., ,~~,,M' Sr•1.'h r."r L y„ r "'',~"I JJ .„~rcr a ~ ~ 4 kk t, F~ r `Y , n, ~ I S } r~ 1 ,4.~ IM' MG +1. nn 'v +~.3 ~ ~r a ~ , 1, ,Y,, ,r fl, ,,f. ~ I :'.tf. ~N~ l . ~M ~ 1 V. .r~. .O r. ~ r9f a~ .~,5-~,~ "..1< N !bN 'yl~ +t°, 1k~ .C„ , 1~~+:4, :I r ~Y'.: .a H. J~, 'i p;, 'S, ~tr M'., k;. 1. ~"~"r~j' q~~f Y c '>K.'~_y2~. . IC 'i r7 v•a~ ~ ~t ~.-c > ~r D~ j~'~7 ti''• r (r',1"' + i i V. i~' 'S;:.de~. •,L'~'v: ~ Nlk. ~t„ ',y ry yr, I r r r., w~~ ~ t :~a :F ',r ~ y, ° Yls!~,r u'. "~.~4 .t^
'Y' VR'h '1 - ~1 ~j b n.'W r '+'I` 4 r'^ r4 . , ~t.r p tN a 1 •t tw: +n. 3, ~,;tz ro .+nd , 1. ,t, ~ o r M r w ,f ~ ' I rf". .y , ' °•4 r' r s• iL`4~ r .L +'7 •~a r,• j '9, Ir ,•~„,I•~ '.J r. ~i, ~ ~f+~ x,,r,,, l,` :~Y. .r. 't .f~++ r' {t' 'y• ~ r.' ,1: v+lS 'ra `I 7 t s' f "i:' vi-t 'r, mot` rl' ~ tti~ ~ v r .t~ r. ^Y r. .,h; 7'.f•f • c i t c~ x t I y~ R 1~',. '1 l ',~f~ h 'r l'/," t'D ~ ~ C ~J.j Y ~ i +W-.I F' ~Y 1 W,...~1 t I I I,Y,'.~~ i'~"t'/I J, t-,' ".y, „V Lr ,.~'1-r. ) Il b d, nir ~ , k t 4 ~'1 tt''t. C . I r~'. "•ixY~ rt ,r„ r J r r•a. '11, L.f,r. i r Y SV:.,f , 1~~.. ,r r 1 v .a,,..,,'1"~ iS+', ~r > r ~ Jr t ,c I~ro . r, y• ~ c. ' . .h ~ 41+~rr. 4 +,,.r, 9 ri. Z: f . r. F a. .r-Ertl" ~ '`P , ~ r to ,,,~''!~.,,t °r).a .j ,t'at" ~~pp,, t? .i34 ..'~'D. l'•~. .J14i ~r r rl'' ,,~r :iy ~i , ¢ r L, .rr ,~rl'.'^~"t '9 f• .r M~'.• .S y .kr .y, r,~ Y `r„ 4 rIL*,..It.~F~11, , ~i .e o,' Y• >,r~,- h'~I~ .r . 1. t.. 1 SFt 1.J ~ ,Vr } , iv •r. ,t'. .r; ~r`•.-: r~}. , .~1 ~ ,•l (^r Y;~i f•, r ~ '1~ t '-~.f ti{4, -~.,5 L' 4 rr ' Y .y. Y'r',' 'S'.1' .1 i I'r~ . v' C 1. a: J ' 1 a,, •.4 t 'r J ~ ,Z,' •r r ' t 1, y:. ,i'. a .r A i. ,1,. ~ ~ ~ b `'ti ~ r- o r l ~n, ,I.I ~~h l+ t. r ::S ~ ,r'4 .4'. ,C:r `,t~ '=N-. ,~•iyrr~A 'i' 'S:'~', .e. °.r?,M^,b,n~:,h•/'S; ,L.~l.' r., ~y ~i~jn1 ~5, .r.,,r •'1' i '~o~ r .1 ,v'~ rr:~- .•ti r tlr ''F '1(`~ rt<'~ '1. ~~r..e:.•,r L'_,. ~~~••r.~ r t`.i- ,i'• .,$~.t K.!-^t%, :~1: , ~~••rr•-~rii'1 r~'.• 'r•- .f ,Ir ~i' rf ~ 7. 6?- r~ {r: 7J.{• ~1. t.g~ !.1 Sii,.~ Ir,' ) i r4 .h}:f'.~ at'. ..t ~;'y/ ,,y.
E,' .,H ~ ~-a f ~ .I1t ,S I ~ . , ~ '"°'J , , r . P{ r ~.tl.+. ~ h ~ 3, .4G~i , •fi fg .r a `d~ i I . jJ _ , ~7{,. Qt? 'ty" ~!Vi'~ . 1S r +1t.1,. ~IrY:), • f ~ C;. ~l( 'a,R ~~r ~Y' ,~1,1 ~ 4, r ~'Y r,,. ~J-~ I r~,,~~ r' '!r'; i Kti 2 r M , .~'t ! 1 . of 1' , 1 t. , ti,. J 1)) ' I rr i' ~'4:' 1; : "t j?,1. ~ , ; N' p , n , ~ '4 . . t'1~ Z 'f . ti`': u J , L' ~ %f w W , .r V.•t. •t ,p 3 . W'.. . T~'r •'r, P r 1~ •l'~ t r t •p ~ I .`y '~r f eY. V , .I' 1; 'hl.:~'f't"jJ .!rr t( •1 ~p6,. ~r'. s.'.1'i t~l~ 1' .S~ P•r,1. u. r 'il. '1' 'r.~, 7 k~ ,r~ ^r< 'f` ~ I v £`h ~,r. r.. I•,1f • d ( r.. Y.~'^ „b b.+ + h • r rte r 1 1 J e . ~ a a r d• . lb ,F r d~'' 7~,:w ;r'~ 3 y 55~~ ~ , .F ~ ,Ir r,~ 7', 1,y 1, ~ ,l '7:, 1;~ l M 5.~. +y,:l+i,. , •T ,J "n, ,t .r ) . ~ k ~'r:.. ~1, "V'. "~.~~'.IU ~ IN ~rl'.l .tM' c~,. .f I'. ri IJ •t n•. 11~ 3 l ~f .y,: .:Rti v,,, `,f.~.lj.. k~ A~] 4 .n ~.t.r' 'r •r '~1'i,,. P; r~' ,t k: i.; pi r''ti' ''t'., ,X•er~' ..'A. r; ..fi, a 1' , ~ { ,rj . Pv i• , J, . 1 x' , . A rfr ..4. .i') ,h• r \ a t ~ .tr, n , '1. ~{r ~ n. -~Ir '{'M a I. ~ / h rt -i .S'. 1-.. ~ .r r f.. , r `nr" k Y r 4.°~. o-~.'-~ ~,Ay'•1•; ~ ~ 'y„1~4,.} ,4( ;a ~Sy .r., Aj1Q C ~ 'vwt ,11 . 1 t ' rf ,y ';g ! ll;. l.\ t'. k• /h. ,T1,/ .^t~ ~ j4fr ,,li r ~ 1:.~"-r: T}r'r'. r 1 '4+ i•a `t~ ' w ~ 1 rlr ~ C 9,, ..i~k;~I' v a~. ~7: j . r I.' ~ y,s r 7 v ~ ~rn~rr r. it ! ,,II' ..N R', t>?.~ ^ d t r'dl'"{ ~ a .1 ' fit! \'tr ~ 1~ t ~.l'~r:a. Ri -,~T ° r~~ 1 i.,,,~.',}}1~1' S r~ , w wti '{y'.~_ ~i,~k t f' f, y,..ti . c !'.'S . h., J. T.r~y , c'r r i' i , I ' ; °i . f.,,,,', h ''t r. , l r:,. , '1'' 1u. 'i J,a
w r .yr .,.Y• .F~ •.~q•'/, '4F 'ti ~ 1}, w;:.. Y+4, r. ~ !r A't~' J ty~' rY~^rc,b r• i y5 y .,t a ~'1. ~5 ti},,.. yr G -,J 5•J' -.Z,,. 'Ci, I. •lr•7' 1• K Ti~w' ~y' t' h w 1C •r ~7_~,t J . 1 ~ r ~~7'+y I , 1 ' a 'E I It .4 P :C . Jr r r ~ , k • ,~i da 7•• r ;i ~r rr 'h: ~ 4r1, y b+ 1-F. r~ f J•, ,I,. • ~ ~ . ? ~p~7. [ 4 ;"M } r, aJ~ y,~~ d ~ty• M1!'t7F' p '~6!" o 'r~I S. c r'. , • ~Y r~.J. ,l,'. 1 1, ry' ..J. ~a1 .rl a. v a 1, 5 A 7'J(y}{,~ ,i f' 1,. Z l~'^r~, 11 ?~~y I, , y I k K ~:.L .4. k I~h, 1 ~f `'T'„4! I, ~ f p.-' r15 f fr ~ ~ .i'•v'. ' J~ f~ 1 ~ 'Vi.C 1, ri '1'4~.. 1 .r~ C Tr 'Tr. r I' i~,.;y{ , 'T!F i „ r,, r,yt, ` 1; ~ r 'Gr x ~ 'rp ,r" ~r e2r / ,N r,., f ,4 ,.t ;.o ~4• .'~'yy, i t? - ! '1~ .b~[~y -.'17 ^'v i, ~ s ~r ,r,,J .rr}f~-„ "r') 4r IJ I ~ i,,l: I ~!,1Sy1^ yfi „ r ` '/ryjt / ,fir/~; ,,7~, r p y 5' , ) IF G~ F p. 1„ i . , •r. (r M j•y11 r{!~~ { i'}l %~4'. f~ ~"t f. I ` ~J .:r ',1 .L N, -i t . ~ _rr;. } 'yr. ._1- ' e.i Jt'tl.• ,r, ?~~r t .fit .',J 'j,~l 'i. %7. {~`1"l~r G, fv , t. .r', ,r~, ,'S , + y;~ ".'1~, r +',:r'~',,' ,r - ~'4 t "'h,'J . ~'rf §;cti; 'J , r,,r,y- n ~ n . a.j. y . 719'. i'.~,i~pp, .L, , .f ~ 1r„ :r t~ ..gyp;. ~ rr,tit y ,-T.I : +p 'a'",i.,. i x, ..,-!'.J'r ir: [ J- '•r .k , Jt 1 r , r' . 5 f ,{'1~. ' q< <n.r , ~y ~~tt r.~,(, y~~ .I, f.af{~J,yn, .l ;H: ,?J, J' ':,1,~, ,t, rCr:' `Y,,4j,"'r,~,, 1 'ti.` „A .1N~, -l. ::.til It~j)( ~i / .•t,'• ~ r~ y~h;. ..1- ta,Y• 1 {7' y~'Y V°~,r" 5 i ,.IrG,~`e'4"',(1~,r~i'~' .T'?y~ ,~r~,7- ,R ' E t j r 1\,4~~, .4. d isk ~-u ~•f .r~"r ,+t 'Jd, 4 +7\AS,: ~•r v' :1H~' '4,:. r u'•,h rlCi, r
i" 7 r. 1 . ~ ~'I ~ ~tt'l.r ~ r ~.i ~1t 1 , 1 a. . i 4 4'..11:(' ~1F ,`M~r ;S.' ~ . ~ 1t~. h~ 51 ~ d ,r .r d' T' r F ~ o r4{ ~ +S ~t• ~ J' }.4 } ri ,a •i•. ~'1 . ~ . r ~a ~(,(~rryt p~j kr 't+ n~ft, .I r .r 4 •r , v ..r~ r•'4 `t {r,.-l' I;'It tt ~•J~U P A. .'I r ~r•MJ ,'v r(h 'A', .r h : r;~e 'I'~)I t11~Y'.• ~ ~rT 'I'~.T r r. ,V,'. .,r ".'L. i`r ~,lt ti' f 'P 't'I,'t4 j. a. ; r• r ~ L f , ~ ~ r h> ~ yi IF I t • ~R. + i t* f , ~ fj , ~1~~ ~ r ir, •l~ fir; ,k h +c; Y i c y.M1 yr ~',v+ .rd''' lpy~~}~',~,.~' 4,iX~ "7 Y~ cam., ,.~'7. :ub~t~ ` ~~r• S'''f r~, ,f ~ r,':'~6" y I!'t! " t.,ir''7.Lo r' f'. ppII ,A H +'<.r~ a it r2-lii...., 7 f ~EW 7~ f:. Ir~~'. ,,I`'tr Nw ~ o ~ t/~~~ •f,1. (,n •4 Y' ~ r'T4~` ~4( ~':1 ~ nr i ri 1 S e Yl',•'I1 .1'r, !I ~y.r. i'~ . y ~ .IM1'X` f' [ ' , 11 ' r µn~ R~.trr P ~~dd w ..~.V ,:,h" 9.~ + , „ 1 ^',r. dv r Ir.~ , l _ ~ , ~b, { .;ri,•'" ' :,;}r : !r ;S'~.1 rtr. .w .,M~l';.'~ , 1; Xj•r"•t ^~t k•. A .~y h' r ,.t~.'1'1 ; ~ 'Fr':Y / ,p 't i °.1,:' ,r r. 1. X' a{.~ .JS, j ,.i., ~R". U ; r t' r `f 1'{, t..l,l ++ri, ,y. r' •.r° •1 N rur eP a:~t,f y 1: :CI.. a~`~•~t.'. .~f~-,' l., a ~',n• a:,+) 'i-.,,-t 1~' ,1..a;./•. •.~r I r.T:~;, ~~r. ~'.c 1'• 9 'V•,~. S, ~,'tl „otiy ,1'1 ap~H, 11 ,d ."1 i .'pr1 y 1"1~ 1'',r r ~ ff'(• ,1~`l 7~'. ..nrS, ` Jn 4 .r r• , F~ ~ »I -i r r ~ 1 ~i j?I' rr r r r r' ,Yn , r , ' Fd,r, ,~q 1.. ''d 1 1 ~;;AW- 1«" ~ ~ -,1 r ,~y ,.if~rh, M.,:r•~tN'?7?rr/', 6 tq4 ~"n.tr, ~ 1 ,,,ir: 1.5.,1" d, ~a ( ° 1 )41dy'; ~ ,~,T'.'+.a _r -'p •ki t N~ - ,i^• t~ y, ,y~:c!Irt
~ , ~ ! ' a. f,• r w. 1 ~ 1.1 7+ i ' ll ^[~'•`^Ir , M f~l kr -Yrf r1 . ~`1 , fi . i'vl ir: ~I,A d 4 * ,t`.. r ~ . ~ r ,f+ 4. d,X_~ ~ t ~f:,,~,]; -,r~, r 'v 1~~0 I, lt. •,11,r"~k f~l.r f >~a~r'I`'`r'~' 1f*. .'lM1.rll:w` y 1 . Jr ..I 'F+I', ~ * L .t'v• H „ ~J, r 4r t~F,. Y't.'~.' ~ ua r.K.r K ;I~:f pti flyy}} ~y iJ. ~ r.', ti r . t}.Ir` ' ^1'. 'J~:, ~I;t ,.bM 4' 1'•;' f.~ F f J r 4R, ,h~ {':Y"h ~/•o' r.. 7 rCr I.~ri4!-''r}: 11 r'11~J' ~f~ I:al.i r~ r r~.tn'~, ''b, 4'I'f'~tl.l-~,`,r a. f Mr 1p J. , .r ~a].1M~In' r .;,.Y ~;•r'°~y,,' ' if, ?a' 1 i) •1 f• ,;1: , t l.r ~ t_,°f'~1P~!,•u ° y If} ~r %.l , r. ~ !~f 1-I F.;.LL tl; "',4.h.\• ti!~..~W~, a-17 '.V~~r lkf 'W~~r, r tr'i.,t d.., r,2 ,'H 4~r t' l r'. ,t'~~1! -~1 i~-~ r'+°~_\1 y.-,r 'rJ 1~, * .I x d. i' h r ~ , :7~ .r. .4. 1,, rF. .4 ,~.1 4!•..t ~rf,icr.°'+i• S; y y;-4r d.~ -t`.:N. .,','^{r ,".,'r,rl!`:r• •!i N~.,,k~':, ~t 1i t~ ~ i4 ~ ;tdr,~ ,);i•tt/' d >>~r Y1...1~-, rir tit; n.,t7}7:~ r t'C; m:. ,q~:~) •:a_ ~S ':1'i-., + ,fin, ."r!;~.,. ,~...~z~' t Y/ ~",d+ r a: ~{I'~.yf .~:r ,l'ti':.5i,•~, .1 } .t.,ft'k1,{. ''l i,5r~.. h.j'I, ~~f '.•4. .'G'~'~~ ,r-1~~ r.• C, ~ ~wt 'N.. ,~f fl A~ k-, ,.1?. I- rl°~. ~ 1. ,w\ ~i1N va~{~tr, `~~a lJf, rr ,.1~ r1. ..r'fi'.yl .°°t. 6. \ ~ N <t; r, -.A ' { ~ M y ~ a
Ij ::'t'~E4 1• ~'u,~ '~t ~ 1 ~ . Ui qrr ~ /'-'l:, ~s71' I ti A Tj1, rrl ! . tlt b ~ sdl 'I , r ~ ayL P.X V q,$r n11~, c~ G ~Y N ~~r~. S.'~)'`1 II @y~, 'Ir 1 'ha -y,r~, F'Y A , H Y i 1 ~ >t , ~ • ',,,.y•/ r~ t. r~• ~ 1, 'i . r. l e. 11',•t J r +J y J J{ '4'''rrl, 'F, , ,rl r.~ 1; d,•, ~ .I n. F r K r , r ~ 1 ,r ~y. ,S r•1 ~ r.d~l~ttr ,'C '(~~~h~~ I ~..f`"~",~, ~ i';~f" I( t i.<,+ ~,p~,." i• t( 1'` ' '6 y ~ 4y ' ~Ix1~.' '~1 1 .1 b' ~ ? ~ ,r ~il I f l., F.? ( ''c)'r ? t' ' k- •U ' 't'c^I 1,.~~,rf' r~ + t',. r ~ .(k, r E~1 'Y' ' ~'t. ~ • pp: r " ,a•~ t e'k~~~d~ I ~ i iti, ~ pp I ~4 +~t at+~ r,~E ,q ~ ) u. lr? , J - r. Y', r._ r.. ~ ~j i,' h U., , ~a,i' ~ ~ i, r . .1%1;>.hrl , 1r K r' t+, ''r 4,, .Yl. ; i~' r, ~ {"i C•,J. r:i,.(R ~l- ~tl!'"tit~'r4 ,o.,), ~.r,l ~r), lr ~-I .3i7Jr)`~ .1 r. ~ ~','f '':L. .T'~ Y. .4- 1 ~y;,~ •',.'i1ir~ r f q . Y :nt: y b r'• 1 w .Y I,.A / ~ J. ,f,. I. h. , 1 '4~vd 1., , tt 1r 't1~'~r . r. • V' a 1~ \ a . 'I+ t ti. Y' aS ~ 'J r.l ' •-T. :d! ~d r''• i 1 r\:" r< " r ' ~ .y, 4n, Ft .'i..'~'~• f r q , "~'4'ti 1 ~ °M T r„ h ,.I. .~I ~.•''V. y ~ r a E' R.'r .-ta. n+: 1, °°f'.'~,'. y, r' ~rr .'`.;°•.K.'~.'~,. ~~~rt •~,'iT ' a' 9. 1 J~,,~r r4 ,C•'1..,X ~„,;y; a''tt'i;~• ,ti ~u. 1 .•~„r',r..~i '.r ~k` t,ot'n4~ .~,Jv'ps'K!• d..t v,. ~,.y,~r .r Jr :•x{',: ~-ti...-:, t,..14•E.~~,~.
'y ~ ~ ~ , ( k yy w ~ I Jr ~ M k r i (~,~1}J' C ~ •,l ' d' {I, b h Q ,~di 1~p + r , 4u r' ~ ir1A :~ilr!a ~J{WM , , . 1"'r'4 a1~ ~(t,~~y ~ V II w~~ ,~P. ,1 Y ~ ' i k1, yrfy,[q~ r ~ 'J L. ~W ! 1 ! I.w W ~ 1 ~~qqlr~{, r HI'1 / I,• i~ IIY.~}, p I' '~~~jJ~ t~ J '~~}r~,'r "1~{ 1 1 ~ n1 ,l.~,r b..l',~~.".'Ii ~1~',yyh t' .dd~V /t~., ,/{'d?~~ Ih~1~ r1,(rl, 9';"",rI', 1 r. (yy~I. tl ~~t"f}d ~I ,1/, ~i .w l I r,'Q~,.'..r ~ r. .V~" , I• ~ll. 'T,' 1, ,r r~ ~ '"1 "1~ ~ I :,fry„ 1 I~Q~~ ~y-r tl+Tlv h r ,,'.V ~ 1'1`Ai l•e ~1 '{.R~ r '1 /I 1 .l r x" r Y i, .,y,~~ 4 , ri r!} b•$ , a , ,'its , i ',u . ',~,nro- ,ti., r r ~ ~ \ r•r; ` i. 1 .1~ r. i. L. ;Y. • *.~t`-'r: a 4.., t, • ,a . yL. dl' f rF ''1' ~ ~ , b',F ' •r. :'r 4i, ww. .,'s ~'i• r i• ,+1 ' y, ~"pl. yy. ?a, ~ ~'~,~r„ rL .~i! ai, ; ~ iit 1.,',• , , i~ T~. t k ' v', ,'~11 . r . , I wr ' l5 ~ CX ,i ~ ! r , ~ . {7 •lil ~ 4. ' k K ,u , i ~ t u: ~k•'4!''U• w i ~ , r ! X s" Y n ''4, , J$.( A' r. .w v y ~ 'w~rM, 7,'~, ,'.dtl 1: ~ 1~ M'}T7 r ',ti, 1a ~+,4r6 a., -r., T a.. Iq r F ,t rW ' I th"r~rMr 'r".~Y. ' 4~~ ,(r,t' :--ice:- ~n• :r '~ir' 4 !1 ~ ` • r t~ ~ e c , 4r y~4 , a t ~'4~ ,•r.4r~ 1; i ,r., u.~. ~~1 y~•, r i~. ~ Y ,4 n . ~ 1 I r .~r •'~l!' ~ . 4~It ~1- ~ml't' S~ W~ ~~I ~L'~ 1~. ~~°'~tr~r:~.i "~"9, Tr, ,~N~(,' fS:S l~,l~•'N~i.'_ _t{ 't"~. Y'-~5: r~ I y r ~ ~ f. ; f ;a. K J+Ii ~ . { .14 :i~, i f ,y ~.1, . \ . , , .,~d1(.S. ; Ft ' r { f..r ~ '•r. •P f ,A','~ tJ~'i, rr~ .v .v 7'i r~. ,r}`P ~~..v\ „ 'a' 1, r ,L. ; "tr ?
:I. I ~r~h ,7 ~f , t J. ,r, 1~f~r.,~41.1"IM" ,~j ,~}f f~ , JM.~ 4{~ ?r`I~ o- 1 ,r~, i }Y' ~ H !1' w-, { ti, 4 >r ~ J ~ N`c. .r., lr y 'fy;'F""} i.~ 'i~~ f ~ 1~+ L .v a, °i` ,'J+ •,L~• ~ .a'.,C, f~^, C .y i , ~r d / 3 -i ~r k' ~<S V' 4,r 1 1. N {{~~,,.A'^t .~'4;'1~`. „ ~ ti i:•/*'r .!1.'Z.' ~ ~ .J'W ~1. ~ ~r;•x r ')~.i~' ~~a.1.,r~, v r. ,1-' y rtt li'' ~1 ~ ~ .,t; ~,x'~', r`]~ ~*.~M.^ r 'r~", +.1! i?!''. r k r.J y':i -dn) • , r., r ) ,r r >r rrrhu:, 1 \ Y"",1' : y~~, f h t. t ' 'tP'Ir r, r +'t''~Y ~fi i ~Q,,j ~ 1 ju ?r' '1N.. , r,.. x. f• ytl'~'l ~tF, h ti. ~q7 1 . i'(. ??,,4r~~~ I{) !4~" a4y~1~1.. {;f, r, n r1'd'YiF r'1ll t.~ \;W' ;1jr m. .e ./r~.°.'S ,r~3' I~,;l ~r~h °.r ~.7°. r, J'{ ~,ti~'^r"~41i F.. :}r„`YN'~l'~'r,~~ v° .'pI• r r h4'. r ,r ~ 1. f;!,,t~ v rl . f ~~°~t '~1 'l.4\~} ..r ! l`~- , ~ f. ,4, Y, \ 1. r, ~ / ~'A . 9'~ y, M . , 1'~~. w,~ 1 ~4
1 r y ~ kt+u'.7~~ ri~ YS~4 ~ '~tydk4~ ~}ar';'F 1''J,.,~ Jj'1~ a{h' rti r .rr. , ,.t ''~v"eY, r.,•.., 3 ,II! ,~r ~ + ' r~ t',+ dl' J."' '~,,pp,A'~l~IC '~I.~ 1 '~~1,y ~i ` ,Y~ti , 6. .Jj ,r ~ S ~ r*', t •vy. r1 rl~r d' 1..r .f r. .ti h: L, .r 1{. ~+1',tri L~l,i-.~i~~i~,. ~{'.r 4"C'r-~~i :n. .•'J ~A~°: 1'+•~F )J. if ~'k~. ~'-1';la` ..IM ~~,r~r(,- y.Jt'r.~'Y•rr l;,..f ),•~.ih r, r ~~1 ')'th`~ 'II'r v/~,.'..~rn 'rX ~r ,.rte ~R~.,r ieGYX .6',n f~1.; 4 t ~v .t h k +1 N. . 1. / '-~?/~4~;,^>~i . ,1~.iU`•' \ } qt +•t:r~ u+ ,}r~,i'~ ~ .t.' i~j E»r 4 ~JAttl Vin, A ,`'rt'..i i f •!,N', ''r s'}, X,~. r. ,A,,. 1~, Yq'~f rXY'i'.'. r't ti ~~~i~~t yl':•~x y'. .1'e.r,S ',T ,.~1•.. F.u~ 1 S ~ R", r It , r .c . ,u r y~6rlrr r ~ h gyp"
I ~ ' R' r 1 ~ :14 ~f# f, ~ e:' 1` 9~ .3 'u'~,~ 9" J ~ I~Lti . J} ~s~ ,a1'r ? ; ~ r . ~ } ~ ' f ~ ' ~ ~1 JIB r~ 1 R" ~ 7 r Il".r'~:4+, :::ftl .w .'T. rt., t t w!lY,, ..~l,.ul. ~y f45~. .nrX, ,l.t~ '~'!::v11N..~99~...•lJ~l"~i'b . . , ~ 1•ll ~ v~'0 'F la r y u v r7 i!e l'' I r ' ~4 ":'11A' l , ' , ' ' 1. e I. ~ 5 - ;4~,`,;{.,1~ 4~,,~~r,y~, ± \ , N 4' ~I .S ~ ~ 2~r ~ 'ttt• •'n 'tU,tt {r ')rR{ir (°lr T4,!,:Jr1 rJY1~n~„{r'i ~1~,'4, !'G'i,,•i a~`tY:\ i '"''r °r .M ^d • X' v.r t, ~lr .7..,~ • . , 1 y~ ,,r •w' ti ~'^;i" t. t,: ~ 1~1{r t„A tt le t. `c«. J } J~ y~r ? rr• ~ - fir' . ,r ~ p pP{~ , a r,. r 'r , , i? 1 at . ra'y'Vr,;1.1 ,os4r ,r~""'~ a:'t ~+r , , ,,:yy ,j ; n, ~ ' ~~,,[~d~ t ~1 ~ . . ~ ,._.stl . h,,. i4 ~ , , I!.~ ~ R""'L" N~.. l~ ~~~~'1tM,r~r _,~~.,~..t.
:.y1:1i.~9T~...•I~"Sl•.~.r!~. J ,LA~XT..v; 1'l7rr r~~l' IrA, „nrt}I. A. • . . . , - - ~ ~ ~ J•. •f h`l.7 J.,. awt r. ~i ~Ibnfk' ~kL.! 1. r •L !,l'H n. 1•bn \ r_h ~.w, .btu r, (h.,''l. ~i C17.:,. ~ivt•,~A ?._•,~.:'~:.r~J', .rr:.k.l,.. r! : . , ~ : tY"„
r,; ~•,,w '?,'rdb 7''~'' ~~i I t: t', t lr in~uy~f.G ~.~,k!'
"Y~~f~ .SAX t';Mi . S.~•"t fy.~y~~Kf 't dt.,: ~ !~6- "N i',:~, S'l.. r ~.6 t r,1 , ~4,~,Jq , ~

i
i
I- r r . i
( I i
I I
I I
I 040397 i
I 29-JUL-1991 10:2 \ ase , I
c;\construction_pro,j r-2228wm\casey c y typ i divl I
I -o -v -o -o -v n m I 00 -o m , , a
-n cn -v m I ~ '0 .n N Vi t~ v 'D .D ~ , x ~ m .o ~ ~ c I x ~ ~ p 0 0 0 0 0 0 co
, ~ Q S ~ '0 0 , , p 0 N N~ to ~ N < CN+ 't3 't7 ~ '0 'D p- ~D
Q. ~ Q - • Q ~ ~ i ~ -f '0 Q 0- 'a to ~ p -p '0 '0 • ~
0 ~p ~p 0 'p n 7 I 3 0 co ~ ~ n I ~v ~ ~ - - co c~ c o T o o I
I ~ -a -o n o D 4. 74 p p Q W W ~D Q 0 0 tD ~ ~ o c T ~ o
~D N 0 t0 -i -p W D , Q W ~ , 3- 7~ 0 3 ~ -F ~ 0 ~ 0 * I T ~ ~ W tD W
c~ _ 3 c~ I 7- Q ~ Q. p Q '0 'a , 0 W 0 + Q. tD ~D 3 < ~ I ~ ~ a _ ~ o 0 3 a-
. 3 0 o N o 0 0 o ~ ~ O T 0 n to C
~ o von 3 I 0- p ~ Q D ~D rn
I _ s 3 0 - o a. o 0 0 - ~ ~ I o ~ ~ ~
I o ~ ~ o, o 0 0 ~ ~ , Q r' o 0 0 Q o ~ ~ ~ o o I fl cp t4 N II < ~ "'o - ~ ~ 70 'n I
I _Q - ~ ~ D ~ ~ c~ 0 Q Q n Q l - ~ 0 ~ n n 0 o c~ , 0 -n -n I
4 4 ~D n -o r ~ ~ _ ~ tQ C Q r- `C ~ W 0 r G ~ ,
o ~ 3 ~ = o o c~ ~ ~ N > > ~ W ~ O n I
tD Q 0 W I m 0 , W n c~ ~D ~ ~ i
~ Q- rn r Qo C n t~ Q r I Q. 0 p ~ ~ ~ ~ I
I C ~ ~ to N 3 Q - O ~ ~ C 7~ ~ ~ I 70
o o rn t~ o n a I ~ S T T W ~ ~ ~ 'n I
W ~ ~ ~ 0 0 fl ~ ~ ~ ~ , I D ~ to '0 , fl ~ ~ , D I
~ I = tD ~D D 7C' ~ n I ~ m
~ ~ W I 0 , ,
~ ~ ~ ~ I C
I 0 0 Q Q ~ N , 0 ~ -I I
W ~ ~ , ~D r W tD r I 0
a I
o , I
I , m
I ~ ~ , I Z I
G1 I
i I I
I ~ ~ I I Z rn I
I I rn I
r~ I I ~ I
u II I ~ I ~ ~ ~ I I I
I , ~ i~ I ~ , ~ m a ~ ID nl I
z I I ~ v o m I I I
I ~ z ' ICI ~ I I I
~ ~ II n I I I
i II ~ I ~ I
I LJ I
I -p -o v _ p 0
V1 N '0 w 'o = r 0 D _ , tD `C 0~ 0 0 0 N N < 0 0 p z
, Q o 0 o Q o_ i co o N a~ o _ ~ o- o' c~ -o ~ ~ ; * o a I
~ o o.. ~ v-
Q D , ~ ~ 7 c~ ~ o n I T ~ a C Q° 7 0 0 ~D 0 p 0 0
I n , ? r- 0 n o v - _ 0 lp ~
I 0~ Q to 3 W S 3 W D D tD v ~ 7 ~ ~D ~ ~ W rn 0 ~p '0 tD W ~
~ 0 Q Q W 0 W S ~ S ~ I -o C C S ~ 0 a.
W > > ~ N I to W 7C' N 0 3- W N 0 0 -p 'o x I
Q ~D 0 0 Q. , N - , 0 to 0 (D - 0 , ~D 0 W , fl. W ~ ~ W 7 0 -
~ -p tD 0 W O W 0 c~ a c~ o - c , t~ W 0~ ~ D I
Q ~ , C ~ C C I .-r 3 S 0 , ~ Q ~ Q T o ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ - N o ~ I o -o c~ - fl - ~
Q Q' v? D , _ - Q ~ Q- ~D W 0 ~ , - o 0 0 _ ~ ,
3 7 D , _ , ~ ~ , I 0 r cD , - W ~ ~ ~ I o o
n o0 0 ~ o 0 0 Q O S, I
I X 0 , 7 N W I
I 0 o ~ , ~ I
o ~ , I o o ~ , o I
I x ~ ~ ~ , -,o
I H ~ , Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ; I I
i < , ' ~ ~ , I
I oo ~ ~ ~ , I
I
I o, ~n i
~ , I
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , n I I
i I I
i I
i ~ ~ , i I
I I
i I I ~ , Y
I ~ if I I ~ II I
I I ' II o
~ Z i I ~ II ~ I
I ; II z ~ I
Y V V ? I
0 ~ ~ D + I ® ~ ~ ~ ~ ? I n , ~ , it I
oa I I ~ it I
I i ' II I
I 1
I I
I ~ v ~ v ~ N v ~ 7o v 7° d t~ i
I rn v ~ v ~ v ~ c v c~ ~ o c~ W 0 ~D 0 0 0 W ~ i W tD 0 3 W ~ n n cn n N
~D Q 0 O Q D N~ n N n n N O N N , 0 0~ p I
~ Q ~ C 0 y 0 N ~ N 'U 'p W Q ~p LQ 0 0 ifl ~ t~ to ~ ~ Q. ~ il. 7 Q.
~ ~ tD W r 0 Q- Q to.. 7 p 0 ~ fD ~D o N a~ a o~ a~ o o c~ I W 0 W 0~ n
Q 7 ~ - T r o W p O Q I cn ~ , fl 7 - 7 to to tD fl tD D ~ Q ~ ~ a . f. L).. Q.. a ~D
a a~ a ~ o 0 0 ~ 0 W 0 p,_ a a. a. a cn c~
a- Q C Q r- r- 0 W W Q. t;2. rn rn n Q 0 D_ _ , rn -o ~ a a ~ I C c~ o c~ Q
z ~ o c~ 3 r , i ~ o o ~ c~ o cD c 0 - rn ~ - W - `v fl ~ Q
a. Q_ o- , c~ c~ ~ ~ D 7 0 r W W ~D tD tD 0 fl .F D (4 (
0 tD 0 ~ Q n Q f0 W p ~4 0' ~
I ~ Q , , fD 0 N W , < ~ 0 ~ v, Z3 0 r 7 p ,r, I
Q. ~ 0 , , -i - ~ ~ ~ cn 0 to ~ > > r I T W O 0 r N ~D I
, n. C I c~ W ' a- ~ o c~ o -o o c -o ~
I a o. o o~~ rn ~ ~ ~ - ~ W T 7 to ~ ~ c~
c ~ ~ , o o ~ o ~ ~ o s o ~ I
I ~ ~ ~ n ~ D , _ c o n ~ ~ n to tT o o Q' N C c~ ,
~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ o 0 I o ~ ~ ~ n cp ~ c~ C ~ o' o c- C m 0 I
a. ° ~ ~ ~ I 3 , ~ Q - 3 . - ~ - ~ ~ • ~ rn I
0 , W ~ ~ - .W o o rn ~ o ~ 0 ~ {D * I
I GO N ~ - _ tD _ 0 tD ~ ~ N N 0 a Ili ~ I W
I C ~ N ~ ~ ~ , ~ I C
~ ~ C~ Q C ~ ~ ~ n ~ i
I Q n
~ ~ m C I ~ p _ m rn c ~ •
n- ~ ~ ~ ~ I n * ~
' ~ a~ t~ I ~ ~ ; ~ N - ~ N ~ ~ I ~ ~
I ~ ~ I C
N I • ~ C ~ I m I
• rn * I
i ~ ~ ~ ,
' ~ ~ ~ ~ , I ~ I
i I I I I
I i i I ~ ~ ~ ~ I N
I ~ ~ I I < I I I ~X i i I ° °
I I D I I i I I
I i~ I m i I I - m m I o O I N ~ -0 I I ~ ~ N I
I m D r- r_ W ~ I I ~ o o <
~ ~ ~ m cnX i I I I ~ ~ o < < r i I ( I I I
I ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ I I I ~ I
I I I ? X i I
I + I . I
I -n ao I n ~ -o cn ~
-n -0 7o n n = o0 00 ~ r -I n ~ ~ n ~ ~ N 0 , o c fi n= n S o
1 V~ N ~ 0 W 0 p ~ C s p 0 0 ~ ° ~ ~ c - ~ cc I S 10 ~D , T c N 0 - 7 ~ fD 10 7 d
~ o ~ o s < c~ ~ 0 fl - ~ ~ 0 a ~ - n 4.
n a ~ - ~ cp 7 ~ s c~ n ~ a m tG - 3' C 0 ~ ~ W
n N ~ a ~ c~ , p cn I a o c~ _ -n c ~ c~ c~ to 3 c - ~
s~ p o v+ p a - c I Q. p < C ~ '0 - hl
I a a ~ c W o ~ Q W N W _ to p p ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ 7 to
I 0 , 'p ~ ~ n c ~ ~ ~ n D ~ < W n ~ i
I G~ ~ ~ o ~ u' p 0 70 ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ I
I c s ~ N - ~ p , 0 ~I ~ - ~ I
co , -o c , 0 , Q- I
I , o ~ ~ ~ .
I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 , I C
I ~ ~ _ c I ~ ~ - I
p 0 ~ I
n n ~ ~ I ~ ,
I ~ tD , I ~ ~ , ~ ~ D I
~ ~ ~ , i ~ ~ ~ , 7 I
~ I
n
I o o
-o ~ , ~ _ ~ ,
1 I ~ ~ _ _ _ , ~ ~ I 1 J___. _J i i ~ ~ 1 _ - I ~
i ~ ~ ~ , ~ , , ~ ~ - i i ~ ~ ~ I _ , I I , ~ _ _ 1 I I I 1 1 1 I 1
m I ~ I
m ~ i
1 I 1 ~ 1 I m Z I
I 1 I 1 1 m
I
I ' 1 , 1 ~ ~ Z o I
I I Y rl ~ 1 I I
I 1 ' 1 1 I I 1 ' ~ ~ I -I I I ~
I ~ I ~ ~ I I I ~ ~ r-I ~ I o ~ L cn
n I ~ ~ ~ i i ~ I k ~ ; ~ ~ 1 I ~7'~ I I I I C I = I
fC Z ~ / i ~ I 1 1 ~ O T ~ I ~ y _ ~ ~ 1 1 I ~ ~n0 I ~ ~ ~ m I 0 I ~I m
cn ~ I ~ ~ ~ m L3 ~ t I I I ~ ~ II ~ ~ I L z i
Q n 1l~~ 0 (/1 ~ /J•~ I ~ 1 I 1 ~ I I i ~ $ D `tl ; ; , 1 1 , 1 I o i
O 4 ~ ~ 1 ; ~ I 1 1 1 ~ ~ I 1 1 I N ~ D U ~J ~ 1 1~ I 1 I
~ y ~ I ~ ' ' i I ~ 2 i ~ I I 1 1 I I I
to ~ I ~ ~ I ~-t ~ i ~ I
I ~
I
I
i
i

i
o ~ m-~~~~D=
e
II II II 11 II li II ~
~cclv~Ow-~ ~I ~ O (JI ~ N (J~ U1 ~7
~6~ CT1N 1
-nc~l~~0~ W~ I 1
~ . 0 - to ~ ~o ` ~ O
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ,
~ ~ ;
0 ~ ~
~rnrn , ~ ~ ~ I
~1 ~ ~ I O
I D ~ n ~ i ~ I ~ ~ i
~ I I
I I I n ~,e ~c ~
I I m I / ~ ~ i ~ -CMB- ~
L' . I - ~ ,
II J- 1 _ 1 I ~
~ _ ff- " II II II m ~ ,
'v C2, ,
II it -CMB- 6
II II
II II ~'1-
~ II II ~y opt II N
11 II .W~~ \ --WLB
`pct i~~No - ~ 1
v,~~~~, I N I ~ Ot~NUIN ~ m
1 ~ I ~ Q~ ~U?N i I ~ \ r i
~ ~ I ~ _ ~ ~ ~0 i '
~~t / I I SON. , I ~ I ~ '
~ ( I I C ~ / I ~ I ;
"1 I I ~ ~ WLB r ~ i WLB ~ ~
y I ~ I I ; C 1 1 1
I I I 0 ~ '
I I I 1 I ry1 I 1 1
I I I ^ r I I I `J I i '
opt I I I I o O I
~ i 9 I ~ m
OWE O I I I~ y n ~
O' : I I v p~ , I ~ ~ /C O ~ , Z / 1
4rn v, .oo I I ? ~ ~ i n ~ i .Z y
N O I I / W I ' ~ y
~A~rn I z V' R I 1 C / n /
I I I ~ ~ 1 I i ~
II I ~0 y C I II ' ur- r ZJ.I.I..,t1- O ~ ,
I I I r Z
II I - _ _ N Z~J.r'u~+ \ I I - ^ _ ~J.r' r
' I I I ~ ^ ~ ~ II I / I
opb I ; I I. I
~ ~ II • ~ O 456 2 l 10.00 ~ I II
rnN ~o I II ~oo~ y II I I ~ ~ rn ~ ~
OV~~N~ ~ II I N ~ ( I
Ib.p~ II ~ ~ b O~~ ~ I
4 N ~ ~ II I~ ~ n O II ~ ~ ~ I
of rn y w I, 45517 1 10+5 ~ i ~l ~ ~r
~ , I I ~ o o ~A~ o ~
b W N o ~ ~
i y~ ~ I b~ O ~ y ~ o 0 I s I ~ o O I I~ ~
o ~
~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ r
N ~ Op~ll o Rl o ,c~ o i ~
~~~opb ~ ~ ~I i c„ ~ y w I
6 , `y N N ~ 55b ~ o n ~ ~ I
t~ ~ _ _ b I
~ r
1 I I 1 1
• ? I ~ ~ tit l~ \ I t,~
+I tl I +I ~ , ~
i ~ ~ h I ~ ~ I I. o I ti ~ ~ ~ ' ' o I ~ ~
~ I I, ~ I r ^ O 11 v! ~
y I II p ~ ~ f~ I
I L O'~7C~~ I 6 I ~ ~
I 1. ~ I N .gl ~ ~ .9~
~ ~ OD ( II ~ 00
00 i ~ ~y~op~ I II c~ l S o
I II 1 I ~ v j M M\ M M II
t~,~~n\`~ I 11 I 1 vW Q~N~ II rn
~ _ _ ~ ~ o II _ r~- 05 9 ' ~ ~ I
tn~,~o, I 059 ~ ~ ~
v I II ~ m ` t~ °p I I I I
1,.~ ~ I , ~ ~ , v r ~fv~' ~ ~ I y ~ ' ~
I 11 f 00 ~ ~ C bo I ~ _ L , l7~pp i ~ ~
h m n I ~ m ~
r I < 2y ~ y r, I ' - ~ ~ 3 , ~ ~ ,
~ f I II ~ r 1 y ' ' I
1. f ~SO I ~I n ~ i Sp I I I 1
cv ~ . ~ . I 1. 11 b f I 1 I 1
1 bl I J , 1 I W I I / 1
u ~ ~ 1 KO 1
r 6'15 ~ / 1 0 s o ,I ~ o Vry I I 1 O 1 IC 1
1 I II 1 y II L ~ ~ i ^ I
~1 ~ s ~ 11 11
I , 1j II ~ N _ O ~ ~ 1
I 1 11 O I 11 ~7 r^ 1 ' I
1 ??j~Y vl 0 ~ , 11 ~ 11 ~ r ~ 1 ,I II ~j ~ 0 s 1
O
u II 1 O O
_ r' I -1 , 11 I
1 . II 1 -°4~ ,1 ~ ti '
1 ~ N I' ~ m n
~ I I I X11 I 11 I 1 ~ I
~ 1 II 1 I I I 11 ~ ti
1
I 5~ I 5 01 5p 1 0 II / ~ 1
. l i '
~ 1 ~ ' i ~ I
11 ~ ~ I
~ ~ttt t' ~ z 1 t' ~ -~~'Y~'~-' ~ ~ ; ~
1+ t' ~ ~ .zZ ~ ~ ~ 1~ ~ 00 N r ~ ~ n
~ ~
1 -rn ~ - ~ _ _ i l~ i N ~ ,
i t' ~ t 11 -H ,
~ . t~ ` N ~
1 t t?j~ 1
~ l - o m 9--_ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ 0
1 1 N ~ ,
~ 1 ~ ~ 0 t 1 1 oN ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~
` ~
~ ~ t ~ I r ~W~
` ~ CD O lfl~r 1 ~ ~
i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
1 t 1 L n t 1 -Q
1 1 t 1 ~
i ~ t t ~ ~ ' ~ 9~y \ 'i ~ ,
1 ` c ;
t ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 W . \ y
1 t ~ i~
1 t 1 ~ O t , 9w 2
, 0`~
1 1 ~ '8W~_, ~ti
1 1 1 ~ ~I 1 1 '2
1 1
~ 11
1 ~
1 t
~ 1 ~ ' ~ n ' 1
~ ~ t t t 1
o t t ~ ~ t
-Q 1 ~ 1 t ~
~ 1 t t 1
N 1 ,
~ ~ 1 1 t 1
~ t 1 ~ 1 1
t ~ '1 1
t 1 t ~ 1
1 ~ , W ~ - ;
1 ~ t 1 1 1 _ t
Q 1
~ = 1 1 1 ~ t
1 ~
,1 1 1 In ~ '
Q Q N , 1 N t 1 C ~ ~ ~ o o ,
< I 1~ t 1 1 ~~L ~ mo ~ ;
oc 1~ t 1 ~ r ` 1 1 ~ z f ; n ~ , ~ D~o~
~ i 1 t tt 1 Z z~ ,
~ mo N ~ , i ® m ~ ~m N ~
~ 1 t 1 ~ t ~ ~Nm
J 1 t 00 ~ ' 1 ~ ~ z
~ 1 1 t IN t 1 ~ z
~ ' l t m ,
1 t t z 0
'.1 t 1 ~
I . ~ N ~ 1 l~ t ~
N 1 t l / m zo
1 t 1 W U' t ` 1 1 1 1` ~ "D =
zc m m r' W m ,
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
0 ~ 1 1 1 t D v~ z ~ o
1 t \ t t ~ r
1 1 1 t 1
0
m

N
0
1 ` , 1 ` ~ 1 1 T
1 , 1',, ~ 1 ~ ' N
1 1 ~ ' 1 ~ , 1
o ' z ~ ` ` 1 ~
U~ ~ H ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 1 1 , , 1'•~ w
w ~ w ~ -r, N i 1 , ~ N
= a.-. 1 1 N srJ ~ ~ ~ N
~ L 1 ~ ~ 1 , 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ 1
= 1 \ 1 ` ~ , 1 ' •o
1 1 , 1 ~
~ ~ i Z 1 , ~ ~a ~ ~ 1 .V
1 w Y 1 ~ 1 00
U ~ ` 1 1
1 Z Z ~ 1 W C1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1 , 1 ~o ' ~ m~ 1 ~ , 1 mL
~ N i"~ C~ 1 1 ~
w fV~~wJ ~ N•°`~ ~ ` 1 ~c
1 ~ z Z 1 ~ r ~ 1 1~'~ ~o 1 'l ~ ~1 ~ r
~ C cJ ~ U 3Z ~ w p~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 ' ~ N 1
Q ~ 4j', 1 ~1 ~ - N U~ ~ m
O p ~ ~ J ~ 1 1 1 , 1
a. ~ 1 ~ , 1
, 1 1 O ,
~
1 1 ~n ,
` 1 en 1
1 ' ~ ,
5' 1 ~ 1`.
s~" 1 ~ ~ 1 ~
1 ~ ` , ' 1 ~
1 ~ ~ ~ Q , 1 1 +
1 ' , ~ , 1 1 ~ ~ C1'
1 1 1 , Cj
t ' 1 1 , ~
' 1 ~ ~~.J 1 ~ J
, ~ 1 U 1 1~ ~ ~
1 ,m 1 U
d ' l1 1 U ~ /
1 ~ 1' ,
,
, 1 Q 1 , 1
1 1 1
_.cs- ' - CM t ~ 8-_ 1 ~ ,
0 ' -C , 1~ ~ ~1 , 1
cM M 2 B~ M ~ ~ B~ 1 1
O ~ ~ 1 , ~ , 1~, Q
~ ~ ~ 1 'm III U 1 1 ~V \ td 1 ^V
~ V J ~ ~ ~ U ~ 1 1
0 ~ ~ ~ \ CM ` ~ a, 1 1 Q
~ ~ 1 1 , In\ ~
~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ 1 ' 1~ ~
v ~ 1 1 v~ 1 ~l
~ ~ a0 ~ ~ 1 M 1 1
o W~~' J ~ r ' '1'L~ m ~ 1 ' ~ O ~LJ'' ! ~ J ` ~ ~ 1
~ ~ ~ ~ zN Z ~ ~ 1 ~
' o ~ .4 N , 1
1 ~ ~ ~ Ali ~ ~ ~ i ~ N V~ 1 , Q
~ J v ~ ~ N N ~ ~ 1 ~ v J \ 1. , N ~ ~ - --1- ~ o 1
~6 ~ ~ O / v O ~
\ ~ J W ~ z o~°4 w , 1 ~1~J~ 1 ~ ~ 1
/ ~J l I~ 1 1N
1 I 1 ~ 1 ~ 1
/ r cV ~r ; fit- ~
1 I / 1
1 1 ,
II~ ' I 1 ~J.,Lu- 1 1
I ~ 1 ~
i _ "~J~' 1 1 I J ,
1 l ~ I . ~ 1 ~I I
,s , - 1 I I~
' ~ ~ i ~ l t, I I
1 ~ I I ,1 I ~
i~ ' I I cv 1 ~I '
' ~a 1 ~ I _ 1 ~l _ ~ ~ 1 1 _
1 II , 1 ~ ~ \ I~ ~ ~ - -
1. ~ I t l 1 ,i n
1 ~ l~
I ,t I 1 1 i~ 1 ~I II
1 I ~ W II ~1
1 ~ I 1 -l Z II II ~ 1~
~ 1 I 1 ~ ( L-~ 1 Y 1 1~- I ~ Q] O~~ II ~1 I ~ ~ II ,l
1 I ~ f h it
f~ U m ~ J U
~ ~ I s 1 ~ W I~ ' ~ v~ n
I 1 ~C~, X11 ~I I ,
1 a'?I 1~ ~I I 0 ~ ~ ~I
C t~ I W ~~1 U I1
I I ~ ` I I
I ~ i J ~ \ 1 ~ ~ o ~I
1
1 ~ I W 1 U Z
1 I I 1 1 ~ ~
' I Q ' ~ ~ ' i ~ ~ ~ J I ~ ~ ~'1
I V ~ 1 ~ ~ w ~I ,o N b
~ ' w .i 4 ~ N ~ ~I ~ ~ N ~o - ,I tv ~Q~ . ~ ~
1 ' / ~4 I w W ~ ~ I ~p ' ,I ~ ZDQ1M1 I ~ ~ ~
1 1 , 1 U I p W
1 \ ' ~ ~ ~ it ~
' / I O ' z o f o ~ ~ ~I QJf~~ ~ ~a ~ ~ it
' ~ O ' ~ ~ I ~ 1 ~ it ~
' ~ S ~ ~ V ~ 1 ~ v ~ ~ `I ~ * ~ it
4 m l F,
~ I 1 U ~1 r^~ J 1
1 1 ' / ~ { p 1 I m I ~ II
1 1 ~ ~ I N y ~ ~ ~
~ 1 ~ I ~ I ~ h ~ ~
' I ~ 1 ~ A^~ ~ ebb
1 I ~ J I \ ~j. ~ ~ ~~O IGj ~ ~ ~ l0
~ 1~
~ ~ ~ I pp~~N~O
' n 0 `I ~ 1 v ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~ r J ~ ~ ~ ~ r "
~ ~ ~I i 1 ~ i
v ~I ~ 1 y~ I ~ ~ wdo~~~
~I ~ N w I
' •I G ~ ~ I ~
I ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ I i Q o I
' U ~ ! vI Z ~ o v
rn I ~
I O ' ,i jam.
' 1 I ~ M .I ~p ~ o „ ~ O
i Im b cn
' 1~ i ' m ' v m : ~ ~rNo Q- ~ ~ ~.o ~ ~ NI , Q ~N~~~O
' ~ u ~ ~.N~ I ~ obo~N~
---I------ i- - ii (n ~ ~
~ i Q , I 1`~
/ i ii ~aQJ ~ I ~ i~
w ~ I ~
I '
' ~ ~ -mrn--ten gy m, i ~ ~ ~ ~ f-.
m z ~YL~ . ~m-~ ~ ~ i L ~ i ~ V ~ ~ 0 u
~ o , ~ . I ~ ' ~
' ~ ~
~ v ~ ~ J o A ~ O ~ 1 ~ I ~
i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~b / ~ I ~ ~i-. d ~ ~ O
' J J/ I O
~ Z , g1M-~ _ 1M--~ W ~ ~ , ~ pOtn~~~ 9 m ~ ao I , ~ i-
~ y p ~ ~ V / ~/1 v~ ~ 65
Z m ~ . ~~r~ 2 I I ~ I ~Q4
~ ~ c o ~ O I ~ I V I
~ ~ ~ ~ r C ~ I p ~ I
i ' I J ~ I
i ~ - ~ ~ ~ I I a
~ ~ I "`S ~ ~ I 1 N
i 0 ~ / ' ~ ~a1Q1 ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
s~ s ~G ~ ~ ~ Nl(1~. alb
m
i J \ ~ pN~tn~?t~
I II vJ M ~ M ~ 1
_ l'" _l \
91M \ w Qa,1~ ~
\ 0
~
I ~ ---9W~--- ~ I~ / V _ ~ 'T
~ I~ _ \
~ ~ ~ ~ i~ . ~ ~ r`
~ I - I I
I m ~ I U
~ -BW~- \ - I I I
~ 0~ I ~ ~ ~ a I U ,
i ~j' I ~ i
~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ I
~ ~ / i C
/ ~
~ ~ , ~
~ ~ 0 ~ ~
/ ~ ~ ~ O ~ - ~ ~
- O Imo- f L(7-'~O Q ALL
I'~l N ~
Who ~ ~`r~`O
~r~0`~~-~0~0
ti~ i n ii ii ~i n ii ii
i i
a ~
ti

t

' /
~ r ~ - ,r .
1 I ~ ' / ~ ` ~
~ ~ i ~
i
/ / f~l_ _ ~ `
0 ~ ~ ~ i .~n~Y~
. , I r, i _ _ / ,
it II II 11 II II 11 / S -ti 1 _ / ~
I - - / /
~ O Cif ~ N lJ1 (T~ ~ ~1 ~ ! ' Ql
~ w I. wtfl~~~N I ~1w~00rv~1 ` ~ %fi ,
-i ~ O I
\ _ ~ O / ,.r
~ ~ ~ C ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
.....I l ~ ~ ~-u ~ ~ ~ s~
1 ~ ~ ~
C ~ , ~ cc 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m
O I ~ ~ ~ 70 ~ I 4 ~ i ~ l ~ A~ ~S`~ / . I y -
I r I I - ~ f
I, ~ I _ i / z
_ I ~ I ~ ~ ~.t.. ~
`~I ~ I I - \ I \ / ~ ~ / ~ v
- - .~j / /7 L~-
~ x j i ~ ~ r~ ~
II ~ ~ ~ II I ~ ~ r
~ ( _ / I I ~ / ~ it
II ~ - i i ~ t'~ ~~-r.
11 ~ it - - ` ~ i i ~~r,
~yrpD~ i II y ~ I I ~ i y
h M ~ h 11 I I f~T I ~r
~ No II _ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - --W~F
rn - - ~ \
OfV ' ,i-- r ~ -t ' ~ r. ,i
~ I ~T ~ ~ ~ l,~ t11 ~ I ~ r
l~ ~ ~ ~ I N, ~ I ~ I .
~ ~ ~ .^t I ~ ,i~-. C , 1 ` ~ ~ ~
1 ~ ~ I ~ ~,r,- ' ~
I I I u~ ' ~ _ . _ - ,~~_~t, Uti ~ E. ~ 4 i v~ ~ E. ~ ~ ~ ~
~11 1. I r IJ I ~ Lsi~ I,.. f' I' ~ I 1 ~ ~~L_r~r--1~"~~
i O l ~ ~ ~ ri t Ni
~ r ~ ~ 1 ~~i~0 ~ I .i~ I I 1 I l- ~ 1
D , ~ M y n ~ ~ I ~ I ( ` ~ ~ y / ` Y
WVIO~ I I I~ I
p ~ / ~lp~~~ ~ 1 I ~ I ~ ~ ~r, ~ ~
L ~ I~ I ~ ~ _ O ~ ~
. ~ lJ1 Cb ~ j , I ) ~ ~ l,~ ~ ~ / C ~(V~ '~I ~ ~ I h O~ ~ ~ L Z - , _
~~ZD I ~I II ~ ~ ~ y V1
~ i~ I~. ~ ~O ~ ~ I 1 1 ~ ~ O n_ _ _ ,1;, O a, ~ I I ; yo _3 ~ y J ~ ~
C ,
y I C r I ~ ~ ~ t, . - Tyr ~ - , _ n ~ ~ _ 1
11 I ~ ~ ~~I-~ ~iJ ~~..1~-~_~~ ` 1_ ' r 'x.1.1..' I_r- O l
~ ` ~ ~ ~ I I i a I - ~ ",~-1~~ 1 ,1 ~ - 1 ~ r ~ ~
.J_~~i r~1
w \ I~ ' ' I ~ - - - _ - ~ ~ i~ ~~_1 ^l
it N II u O ~ ~ I I ! ~ ~ . ' ~ ( ~z
~ rnN"~ D O~~o~~o y , I~ ~ I I ,Y ` -
I. I ~ ~ ~ 1
N ~ ~ t ~ 11 ~ . _ ~ , -
~ f I~ l I ~ n O ~ II ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ - l`- r, I
rn. I I I~ ~ i~ ~ I l i V~ o ~ ~ R~ u
II I 7~ ~ _ . ~
~ O I. n , ~ ~ ~-v -n _ 1 ` i
I ~ ' ~ - rn ` I O ~ J '
~ ~ ~ o 1 II ~ - ~ 1 _
~ o _ ~ ~ IJ ! n
I I I ~It~ , ~ ~ - , ~ h l
~y~pp~ ~ ~ tir I I / ~0 n ~ ~ "l
I ~ -ir~ „ 11 it I [ ~ Ti ~ ~ ~ > 'v (s~ ~ ~ r
\ ~ ~ - _ ~~-Q~~~ ~ r ~ ~ i=" ~ I~ ~ s ~ ~ . i ~ j r i
~ f _
o;~~-~,,- ~ I I 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ / + 1' y
~
4, rn ~ ~ ~ II II W t ~ t~` , I ~ ~ r L r. ~
` ~ li ICI I ~ t ~
1 1j ~ r I y ~ ~ V i-' ~ ~ ~ - ` i
y I ~ / O I Ism I,
I ~ ,f i, 11 j~ o II ~ ; I ~ ~ ~f /
~ I~ r ` ~ / 1. i, ~ i i
~ N I ! , ~ ~ 11 _ ,r. A Y
~y~0 ~ ~ I 1. y I ~ ~ D, I ~ ~ I _ ~
11 II , ~ O T~ „ II h II f n ~ I ~ \ ~ ~ ~lJ rV ~
o I, I ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t'~' ~ o ~ ~ r T ~
X31• •N ~ ~ I Rl O ( ~
O~ N N _ ~ 'I to C11~ ~ ~ 11 ~i - O + ~i ~ ~ p O~N~ 1j , m V ~
O W i i i ~ ~-n- _ ~I > ~ ~ v I- _ ~ r- ~ ~ ~ ~ ,r ~
~ ~ ~ I I r I ~ I ~ ~ "`r
~ r Iii ~ ~ ~ 1
~ ' I ~ s - L ~ ~ - ~ D ~'~r ~ I I I ~ ~ I ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l1 '
r I ~ 1~ ~ ~ < r' Z y Z .I i 1 ~ s J 1 - i r'` ~ _ i
I 1. I I , O ~ ~ ~ r, 1 7
II 1~ ~ ~ rn r 1
t ~ ~ ~ \ ~ 1 ~ I. ter, ~ ~ ~ \ ~ \
~ II 11 1,~ Z ~ ~ `I ~ ~i `'r
T I I -l ~y ~_~I- ~ I 1 y ~ _ ~ \
1 4 II ~ ~ ~ I _--I I 11 ~Rl ~ ~ ) ~ I ~ a, ;
r - _ i ,
~i ~ ~ ~ u II ~ I ~ I~
II / ~ ~I 11 `~i y , , ~ ~y r -
I I , I p ~ ,Y I I 'I h 11 -i i~ 1 ~ ~r i S
~ ~ I I. 1 ~ '-C,. . ~ - i
1 ~ ~ I 11 I ~ ~ , l_ ~ ,-_"_l. ~
'I ,1 ~ 4 v ~ L, ,
-1 I II r'
_ I _ I 11 1 ! ~ ~ r ,
11 ~ -
~1 11 I II": i, j1 + L ' Q ~ ~
~ 11 , II 11 r ~ r 1 ~ 5
~ I r 1~ l l ~
,I n
1 1, j1 ~ l i 11 ~ j
i I ~ I II I I 1 ' ~ I 11 11 ~ a ~ ~ ~ I- 1
"v 11 11 1 T ~ - ~ ~ 11 Il I' 1 V ~ r-, ~ r. ~ ~ ~
Ali Il ~ - ~~r'~. ~ ~ '1 Z ~ ~ ( ~ 4 '
i ~II 11 ~ ~ ~ 1~~~ 1. 1 111 II ~ ~ r ~~'~~1^L. - ~ ~ I j ~ _ - ~ 7 1~1^~, ~ ~ ~ r ( r~ ~1
,I ~ '''I it I ~ ~ ! i 1 L~ r",--,~_ ~ ~ ~ ~ L- IRS ~ ~ J
1 1 Il ~ 1 V 1 1 1 1+ 1 ~ 1 / ~ ~ / 1_
,1 I 1 i 1, ~ Y .A L -~'~r- ~ ~ ' - . _ ~ ~ ~ 1 11 ' ! I , ~ >r , Rl - l ~ L}?,~, j ~ f ~(A; ~ ' 4
I r ,I ~1 I~ 1 ~ ~ 1
~1 11, I ~ N ~ r... l ~ yl 1~ ' 1 ~ 1~,^r i ~ r t 1 ~ /
~~I )1 ~ ,1 1 1 ` I ~ I ' ' r _ I 1
1 ~ I ~ ' ~~L' Z ~ r ~ Rl ~ J ~ . ~ i ~1 I l ~l~ ((yy,, Z ! ~ r 1 i 1 y ~ Z 4: ~ 1 ~ ~ 1' 1 _ r'4.l t' ~
~ I Q 1~ 1 ~ ~ W~ Q , ~r i I v' 11 If' 1 l ~ N i 4 ~ ~ t 1- ~ Qj ~ ~N ~"i ~
J ~ C" ~ ~ rim r
i ~ 1 ~ ~ I 1 ~ ~ I I i fir, ~
Ir 1 _ ~ oN y ` ~
O ~ 1 z N I~' 1 ~ r- -I~ Z to a h _ ~ ,
1 I 1 ~ tp I~ ,1 ~ 1 1~~ 1 ~ I 1 N O r~ ~ A.1
n . 1 'I 1 . 1 ~ Cp ~1 1 ly_ 1 C
1 ~ ~ IC ~ H. r
11 ' ~ ~ ~1 ~ ~ l ~ L ~
1 I 1 f 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ . r1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1 ~ ~
I 1~ 1 ~ V i 1 ~ ~ ~ ~1 I
~i~ ` l
1 ~ y1 1~ j t
~1 1~ . ~ 1 ~ , , r i ~ .1 ~
~ ~I It , 1 ~ t~~,. Z 1 1 1~ 1 ~ , i ~ 4~ ~ t
1 1 ~ c y
1 11 1 1 ~
1' i 1 1 1~ ~ , "i 1.-1_. V r~ /
i I ,i- ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 _ I S,
I, 1 ,t- , 1 r 'Tl n1 1 ~ 1 r ~ tJ~~ ~ ~ ~ /
1 It t, . l 1 i ~ ~ t ~ ~ s
J ~ 1 1 1 ~ 1~ II ~I ~ ~ ~ ~ /
( ^ ~ 1, ~ 11 1 y v) 1 1 ` I '1 T ~ ~
~ ~ 1 1 1 i T Q ~ 1 ~ / r _ ~ /
~ D ~ 11} I 1 ~ 1. 1{~ 1 11 ~ n 1 / 1 r' /
1 L 1 i ~ 1 1~ 1 I Itl 1 ~ r ~ / ~ / ~ /
' 1 ~ ~ v .ll .t 1 ~1 1 1 r /
O ~ 1 II' i Il 1 1.
~ ' 1 ~ 1 Il" 1 1 ~1 1 ~A ` ' I 1~ ~ 1 1 - I ~ 1
1 I 1. ~ N , i ~ 4 v
t ' ~ 1 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ li' 1 1 T I ~ ~ (N 1 i !
~ 1 1~- 1 1 1 ~ I ~ ~
_ w 1 ~ _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ l
1- 1 1 w ~ -1- , y `1 - t_
1 1 1 t~ 1 ~ ~ ~ J ~ I
~ 1 ~ 1 ~ 1 1 1 ~ 1 1~i ° / ~ ~
I 1 1 ~ 1 ' ' ~ i ~
. 1 1 1 i ~ 1~7 Y
1 1~ 1~ 1 ~ ~ 1 _ . 1 ~ ~Jf.. 1 L ~ 1 1 I j i~ ~ 1
1 1 1 1 ~ 1 I ~1 _ -i , ~
/ ~ ~J ~ ~ ~ O
1 1, 1 II ~ 1 1~~ ~ , ~ 1 , 1~ 1 1 ~7 j D ~
i I 1 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 , 11 1 11 1 r Z - - ~ ° ~ m
r ~ 1 1~, 1 _ i r ~ / ~~N~
. ~1 14 1 1 I 1 1 ~ , 7 r' ~ N m ti ~ ~ ~
t~ 1 1 1 l i 1 IH
i ~ } ~ ~ Z J-~ ~ ~ / m
t 1 1 l
1 1 ' 7 ~ 1 1 1~ ,''fir / / Z „ / o /
1 ~ ~1 ~ 1 1 1 1 /
1 1 1 1 1 t . ' ~ ) 1 1 ~ 1 ~ / % z / m m
CY 1 1 .r 1 , ~ / ~ ~
'1~ 1 1~ 1~ ~ 1 1 1 i ` ~ / ~ N N ~ / ~ ~ ~ z
1 1~ '1 1 ~ 1 1 1 1 I zc ~ J ~ ~ mr n m
1 ~ 1 1 1 ~ m _ o ~ ~ ~ ~ z
1 , ~ ~ - _ 1 11 1 . 1 1, ~ r N N Z
. - _ _ ~ - ~ i 1 1 1 r 1 1 1 1 , ~ ~ ~ _
f' f t ~ < ~
7 c

i
i i
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I 29-JUL-1997 10:29 c.\construction_pro,J\r-2228wm\casey\chnl.xpl I
I d~vl I
I ~ i i ~ j i
~ ~ -
~ _ -
I I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
- -
~ - -
I
I I
I
I
I
I I
i I
I
I I
- - 3 I
I I
I
I
I
I I I
I I
I I I
I I
I I
I
I I
I - I
I
I
i
I I
I I
I
I
I
I ~
I
I _ ~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I _ I
I
I I I
I I
I
I
I 1 ~
r ~
I
i ' I s
I
I I~ I I I
I
I
i { '
1
1
y
I i
I I t I
~ I i I
r ~
I I J
II
I -
I I 1
~ - II
I I ' I
I I
I i
I ~ - I I
I ~ _ - ~ 1 - I _ 1
I I 1
I - I . ~ I
I I
I i
i I
- I I
i ~ - I ~ 1
- - ~ I
ii I I !
i I
I i
-6'~t m I I I
I I
I _ ~
I 1 ~ I
I # - ~
- ~ I - - - ~
'
_ I
a. I
I 1 ' ;E _ - ~ - i • NIf1 _ _
I
I t _ _ I
I
I
_ I~
I I
~ _
I
I I r
1~
I I
I
I I ~ I
I ~ ~ + I
I
I ~ ~ I
I I
I ~ I
I ~ I 3
1 1
~ c i
f
I 1 1
I l_.~..J
' - I I _ _ N
~ - _ - ~T
I N ~1 { , rm
_ ~ r-n
I - , , ~ c-;~
I i~ rm
I - - z _ _ _ r ~ co
-
I
I I I ~
I i~ W~ - s
I rn I _ ~ ~ x rrn ~
_ ~ ~ i I ~
I - 1 I ! I Q I
I ~ ~ - f I
_ ~ ~
~ i ~ i ----I
I ~
I ~ I
I
I a_ - ~ ~ rn
I I
u„
I - -
I
i

-------1
I------------ 'r ~ i
i
I
I
i i 29-JUL-1997 10:28
I c:\construction_pro~\r-2228wm\cosey\chnl.xpl I II ~ I - -
d~vl - -~l i ~ _ _ _ i _ i
} - ~ ~ ~ I - - - - ' - - ~ T - - - - - - ~ _ - - I I ~ ~
- - . - ~ i _ L - 1 - - - ~ - - - ~ - - - - ~
~ - I -
_ - - - - - - I , _ l
w - I _ -
I - _
I - -
- i , _ ~ ~ I
- - - I
I
I I I
- _
I ~ I
1 I I
I
I 1 I
I 1 _ _ -
I R~ _ t - -
t I 1 -
I 1 - - f -
I - i
I
i - I - - - I
I ~ - - I
I _ - ~
- - - f I I
I ~ - - 4 II
_ F
I
i i
I - f
- -
I - - - - _ I ~
_ I'
I ~ - - I _ -
I
I ~ - ' ~
I
i ,
I ~
I -
I ~ II'
I ~ I
I
I
I I
i ~ -
{ 1
4 ~ i -
i _
I I'
~ t i
I ~ i
I
I i
t i I~
I ~ { i
} I
I
i
I t i I
~I
i
I
I I
i
i o I II
I - I~ I
i i
i ~ II • .I
I
i I - II
I i - -
I - - - i
~ I
i i, ~ I I
I - i I
I - -
i I
I I
I I I
I I I~
I ~
~ t
I ~ I I~
I I I~
~ ii ~
I Ii
' I II I
i i I 1~ I
i I! 11 I
i ~ ii fl I
i i I~
i I II I
i it I
i li I
i II ~I I i~
i - ~ I
i i II I
~i I I~ I
i ,i II I
i I
i it I I
i I I
i i I I
i I 1 I I
i i ~ I~ I
i I ~
i i I~ I
i I
i I I I
i !I I I
i I
i i I
i I
i I
i I I
i I
i I
i - I I
i I
i 1 ~ I _ ~ I
i I
i _ _ I
i I -
i I
i i _ L. ~ I
i _ - I - - ~ m I
i N ~ N m I
i N ~ co m I
i ~ Z i ~ ~
i _ m I
i z I
i o I
i I
i I
i i
i N I
i m I
i ~ I N I
i Z
i o I
i I
i I
i -i I o I
i i D I
i r
i N z I
i m I
i ~ I
i I
i
i
i

I i
i
i I
I 29-JUL-1997 10:26 c.\construction_pro~\r-2228Mm\cosey\chnl.xpl
I d~vl
i _T - _ iii
1 I ~ - I,-
I - i i i ~j I
liI i i I ~ -
_ i - - ~ - } 1
I - - - - 1 1
I _ - ~i -
I
- i
i i i
i i
I - - i -
i - I - i
I i -
I - I - - I
I
II I _
I - - - i _ ~
II - _ _ - -
I _ _
- -
I - - Q
I -7 I
1
I 1 I
I 4 I
I
I
i i. -
I
I
I i _
I I
I i
I I -
I - I
I I f i
i
I
I
I _
I - -
I _
( _ ~
I
I _ ii i
I
I ~ I
I _ I _ II
N
I ~ I I ~ i I
I I
I - 1 II
i I ~
I _ I - i ~
i I ~ i I
I I I I
I i I
I ! II I 1
I _ I
( I
I'
i`~ !I
I
_ -
I
I ii it
i ij
I~I _
I I
I I
I ~ li ~ !0 I
I I I
- ~ I i I ~ ~ I
i I
~ ~ I
i ~ r~ ~ i I ~ - ~ i I i P 6
i i ~ - - i
i ~ I I
I ~ I ii I 0
ii I i i.
i
I i _ ( - _ ~ _ ~ ~
I - i I I
ii I I
- - ii I I
~t~ ~ I I I
i I - - - i I - I
I i i II ~ _ ~
I 11 i
I - I
II I I
i i - I
I i ~ I
ii I
I - i - I i~
i ~ i II
~ - ~
1
I I I
- I
I - I 1
I I ~ I - I
I I
I
- - - - _ ~ i I - -
t - II
~ I - 1 I
I I _ - ~ -
I i _ ~ j -
I ~ I i
i li
I II
I
~ i - ~ _I - -
~ ~ _ ~ I
- _
~ i - - -r _ ~
- - - -
- - - - - -t - - - - - li
_ _ - I
I
~ _ _ - 1 -
.
~ _
j_ - - _ - - ~ _ - - -
~ 1 - - N - _
- N _ _ ~ - - N _ -
- _ - - _ _ ~ _ - _ _ ~ _ _ ~
~ _
~ o
I - _ X
~ _ _ I ~ ~ ~ - - - - W
i
I
I

i
i
~ ~
i
i
~ 29-JUL-1997 10:28 c:~construc~iv~n_pro~\r-2228wm\cesey\chnl.x pl
I i - - - -
I
I
I
I i
I
I I i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ~ I
I
I
I
I
~ I I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I - i _ i
I
I
I
i ~ i
i
I i
I i
f - i
I
I u
I
I
I i ii
I
I
i
I
I
I
1 ~
I
I i
I i
I
I
i
I
I
i i
~ z
i
i
i
i i i i
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ~
i

i ~ ~i
I ~ + I
i 1
i
i {
i
i
i
i
i
i
i i
i 1
I iN
I ~D
I
I - - O L
_ _ - - - ~ ~
~ m - N
I I - - m - _ - - - N ~
I I - _ co m
- ~ z _ ~ ~
I 1 - m
I ~ - z - - o - -
I ~ - ~ ~
I
I - - _ - m
I x m - ~
~ - - z
- - - - o
I
I ~
~ I ~
I 0 - - ~
D - r
I
I _ - - - m
I m _ - _ -
- ~

0--------------
30-JUL-1997 15,43
C:\COnStruCtlOfl_ r0 \r-2 ~ P ,1 228Wm\casey\lre,,.x l dial P
I ~
- - -
~ _ - - - - i
I
i
~ - - -
I -
~ -
i
I i
i t
I I I
I
i I
I
I
I
I
i
i
v
t ~ i t
f ,
t t
I
I
I
{
I ;I -
1 I
~

! I~
I
1
I I
I 1 I ~ I .
I 1 I
1 i I
I I _
1 ' 1 _
II' i i
I
I ~ I i _
I i 1
I I
I I ~ I I 1
I ~ _
I
t
t
' I
I R
I
I I - I
I
I I
~ t i

i I
I ~ f -
i - -
~ ~
I I
I
i
f -
~ -

_ -
~ r
r
I
~ _
- -
? - -
0
- ~ ~
I m N
q N ~ i N frl
7 9 ~ ~ I ~ m i
n ~ z n
m
I 7 1 1 z - o
j _ i
I
_ ~
I _ m
x m
- u, ~ z
0
~ _ _

o --i
D r
m
m
N