WQ0019753_Regional Office Historical File Pre 2016

North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
Pat McCrory Donald R. van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
September 23, 2015
Mr. Keith Tucker, Director of Public Works
Town of Madison
120 N. Market Street
Madison,NC 27025
SUBJECT: 2014 Annual Report Review
Town of Madison, Residuals Distribution Program
Permit No. WQ0019753
Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Tucker:
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) acknowledges receipt of your 2014 annual report for the subject
permit. A review of this report was conducted by DWR staff member Patrick Mitchell. Review of the
subject annual report reflects compliance with Permit No. WQ0019753.
An announced routine facility compliance inspection is planned to be scheduled within the next 12
months. If you or your staff have any questions, please contact Patrick Mitchell or me at 336-776-9800.
Sincerely,
C\\4kS2,— \) k),S1*'\
T.\*3•'
W. Corey Basinger, Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations
Division of Water Resources, NC DEQ
cc: J.Kevin Yates, Town of Madison, 120 N. Market Street, Madison, NC 27025
Rockingham County Environmental Health
DWR Central Office—Water Quality Permit File WQ0019753
Winston-Salem Regional Office
450 W Hanes Mill Rd.,Suite 300,Winston-Salem,NC 27105
Phone:[phone] Fax:[phone] Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
An Equal Opportunity\Affirmative Action Employer—Made in part by recycled paper

Permit; WQ0019753 Owner-Facility:Town of Madison
Inspection Date: 09/22/2015 Inspection Type:Annual Report Review Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
A review of the 2014 Annual Report has been conducted. No site visit was made as part of this inspection. The report
indicated that no residuals were distributed or land applied in 2014, and that residuals produced are in process of being
dried into a cake material which will be distributed/land applied when ready and conditions allow. *WSRO staff plans to
conduct inspection of the facility and these activities.*
The report reflects compliance with the permit.
Page: 2

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: WO0019753 Effective: 12/08/08 Expiration: 11/30/17 Owner: Town of Madison
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Town of Madison Residuals Distribution Program
County: Rockingham 403 Lindsey Bridge Rd
Region: Winston-Salem
Madison NC 27025
Contact Person: Robert T Branch Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
From US-158E:At Stokesdale continue on Belews Creek Rd.(NC-65),go 0.1 mi,turn lest on Ellisboro Rd.,go 7.5 mi,bear left on
Rierson Rd.,go 2.3 mi,turn right on Lindsey Bridge Rd.,cross the Dan River and WTP is on the right before reaching US 311.
System Classifications:
Primary ORC: Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On-Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 09/22/2015 Entry Time: 11:00AM Exit Time: 12:00PM
Primary Inspector: Patrick Mitchell Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Annual Report Review
Permit Inspection Type: Distribution of Residual Solids(503 Exempt)
Facility Status: Compliant Not Compliant
Question Areas:
II Miscellaneous Questions
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

RECEIVED
N.C.Dept of ENR
ANNUAL DISTRIBUTION AND MARKETING/SURFACE DISPOSAL CERTIFICATION AND SUMMARY FORA 1 5 2015
'ERMIT #: WQ0019753 FACILITY NAME: Town Of Madsion WTP
PHONE: [phone] COUNTY: Rockingham OPERATOR: J. Kevin Yates REGIONAL OFFICE
FACILITY TYPE (please check one): ❑ Surface Disposal(complete Part A (Source(s) and "Residual In" Volume only) and Part C)
o Distribution and Marketing(complete Parts A, B, and C)
Was the facility in operation during the past calendar year? ❑ Yes ❑No No If No skip parts A,B, C and certify form below
Part A*: Part B*:
Sources s include NPDES #if Volume(dry tons) Recipient Information
Month ( ) ( Amendment/ Volume (dry
applicable) Residual In Product Out Name(s) Intended use(s)
Bulking Agent tons)
January
February
March
April
Mne D ;c4) N 0.4- L 4 1\1 0 Api_) ) / O / 4/
July i
August
September
October
November
December
Totals: Annual (dry tons): 0 _ 0 0 0
Amendment(s) used:I Bulking Agent(s) used:I
* If more space than given is required, please attach additional information sheet(s). ❑ Check box if additional sheet(s)are attached
Part C:
Facility was compliant during calendar year with all conditions of the permit(including but not limited to items 1-3 below) issued by the
Division of Water Quality. ❑ Yes ❑ No If No, please provide a written description why the facility was not compliant.
1. All monitoring was done in accordance with the permit and reported for the year as required and three (3) copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
2. All operation and maintenance requirements were compiled with or, in the case of a deviation,prior authorization was received from the Division of Water
Quality.
3. No contravention of Ground Water Quality Standards occurred at a monitoring well.
"I certify, under penalty of law,that the above information is,to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete. I am aware
t here are significa 1 • •nalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
. /1.1-,.,� l % % /— 9-dots—
S. atu&of Permitte• Date Signature of Preparer** Date
• (if different from Permittee) **Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9(r)
DENR FORM DMSDF (11/2005)

sMt
et4RrER0`1
Town of Madison
120 N. Market Street
Madison,North Carolina 27025
[phone] • Fax: [phone]
www.townofmadison.org
January 9, 2015
To Whom It May Concern:
The Town of Madison has to lagoons. In June of 2014,the Town of Madison had the residuals moved
from lagoon#1 to lagoon#2 and isolated#2 so that the residuals can begin to dry and form a cake.
Lagoon#1 is now empty and should provide years of service before any further action is needed. Lagoon
#2 is approximately 2/3 full and has begun to dry. Because of the residual soils ability to support growth,
we plan to distribute the residuals onto land that the Town of Madison owns where it can be spread in
such a manner that we can seed and straw it. This has been our practice in the past with positive results
and has shown to be cost effective for our small town with a very limited budget.
If you have any questions, please contact Kevin Yates at 336-427-3971
Sincerely,
/ e-'1-4-11.---
J. Kevin Yates
Water Plant Superintendent/ORC
REEEIVEDIDENRIDWR
JAM 9 7315
PI aiaon

AVA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory John E. Skvarla, III
Governor Secretary
May 30, 2014
Mr. Michael Brandt, Town Manager
Town of Mayodan
210 West Main Street
Mayodan, NC 27027
SUBJECT: 2013 Annual Report Review
Town of Mayodan — Residuals Land Application Program
Permit No. WQ0002672
Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Brandt:
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) acknowledges receipt of your 2013 annual report
for the subject permit. A review of this report was conducted by Stephen Berry and reflects
compliance with Permit No. WQ0002672.
If you or your staff have any questions, please contact Stephen Berry at 336-771-5288.
Sincerely,
44,7 „y.
Sherri V. Knight, PE
Assistant Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations
Division of Water Resources, NCDENR
cc: Rockingham County Health Department
Non-Discharge Permitting Unit-Permit File WQ0002672
MOtaiiifil®pg,
585 Waughtown Street,Winston-Salem,North Carolina 27107
Phone:[phone]\Internet:www.ncdenr.gov
An Equal Opportunity\Affirmative Action Employer—Made in part by recycled paper

,4 c.irA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Pat McCrory Thomas A. Reeder John E. Skvarla, Ill
Governor Director Secretary
February 3, 2014
Keith Tucker, Director of Public Works
Town of Madison
120 N. Market Street
Madison, NC 27025
SUBJECT: 2013 Annual Report Review
Town of Madison
Town of Madison Residuals Distribution Program
Permit No: WQ0019753
Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Morrison:
The Division of Water Resources (DWR) acknowledges receipt of your 2013 annual report for the
subject permit. A review of this report was conducted by Stephen Berry and reflects compliance with
Permit No. WQ0019753.
Please note: While not required of residuals distribution permitees, it is recommended that you
provide an explanation of how the residuals were handled in the reporting year if residuals were
generated but not distributed.
If you or your staff have any questions, please contact Stephen Berry at 336-771-5288.
Sincerely,
Sherri V. Knight, P.E.
Asst. Regional Supervisor
cc: J. Kevin Yates, Town of Madison, 120 N. Market Street, Madison, NC 27025
Rockingham County Health Department
L 'cation Unit, Central Office- Permit File W00019753
WATER QUALITY REGIONAL OPERATIONS
585 Waughtown Street,Winston-Salem,North Carolina 27107
Phone:[phone] FAX:[phone] Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
Internet:www.ncwater.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

ANNUAL DISTRIBUTION AND MARKETING/SURFACE DISPOSAL CERTIFICATION AND SUMMARY FORM
PERMIT #: WQ0019753 FACILITY NAME: Town Of Madsion WTP
PHONE: [phone] COUNTY: Rockingham OPERATOR: J. Kevin Yates
FACILITY TYPE (please check one): ❑ Surface Disposal (complete Part A(Source(s) and "Residual In" Volume only) and Part C)
o Distribution and Marketing(complete Parts A, B, and C)
Was the facility in operation during the past calendar year? ❑ Yes ❑vo No If No skip parts A, B, C and certify form below
Part A*: Part B*:
Sources s include NPDES# if( Volume(dry tons) Recipient Information
Month ( ) ( Amendment/ Volume d
applicable) Residual In Product Out Name(s) )((dry Intended use(s)
Bulking Agent tons
January
February
March
April
J
May ` C���� ) 1.1
l 1. r,
June 'July - 3
ATy r,r.
August
- a
September Y
October --
November .;
December
Totals: Annual(dry tons): 0 0 0 0
Amendment(s) used:I Bulking Agent(s) used:I
* If more space than given is required,please attach additional information sheet(s). ❑ Check box if additional sheet(s) are attached
Part C:
Facility was compliant during calendar year with all conditions of the permit(including but not limited to items 1-3 below) issued by the
Division of Water Quality. ❑ Yes ❑ No If No, please provide a written description why the facility was not compliant.
1. All monitoring was done in accordance with the permit and reported for the year as required and three (3) copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
2. All operation and maintenance requirements were compiled with or, in the case of a deviation, prior authorization was received from the Division of Water
Quality.
3. No contravention of Ground Water Quality Standards occurred at a monitoring well.
"I certify, under penalty of law,that the above information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true,accurate and complete. I am aware
th there re significant 1 enalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Signature of Permitter Date Signature of Preparer** Date
(if different from Permittee) **Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9(r)
DENR FORM DMSDF (11/2005)

APS Event Data Sheet
Event# 3153
Section APS
Date 4/30/2013
Status Closed
Staff Derek Denard
Time Spent(Minutes) 15
First Name Kevin
Last Name Yates
Phone Number [phone]
Fax Number
_______------------
Street
City
County Rockingham
Event Category Residuals
Event Category Other
Event Affiliation Local Government
Event Affiliation Other non-ORC permit
Phone Call ❑�
Email/Fax ❑
Mail Ltr ❑
Referral ❑
Walk-In ❑
Meeting ❑
Comments Think I made same entry twice could not find Event#3152 to finish
information.
Kevin had question about the annual report review.
Tuesday,May 07,2013 Page 1 of 1

AVA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Pat McCrory Charles Wakild, P. E. John E. Skvarla, Ill
Governor Director Secretary
April 17, 2013
Michael O. Morrison, Director of Public Utilities
Town of Madison
120 N. Market Street
Madison,NC 27025
SUBJECT: 2012 Annual Report Review
Town of Madison
Town of Madison Residuals Distribution Program
Permit No: WQ0019753
Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Morrison:
Enclosed please find a copy of the Annual Report Review conducted on April 17,2013. The review was conducted by
Derek Denard of the Winston-Salem Regional Office. A copy of FORM DMSDF was received on February 18,
2013 indicating that no distribution or marketing occurred in 2012. The facility was found to be in compliance with
permit WQ0019753.
If you or your staff have any questions, please call Derek Denard at 336-771-5286.
Sincerely,
�.
f Sherri V.Knight,P.E.
Regional Supervisor, Aquifer Protection Section
cc: J. Kevin Yates, Town of Madison, 120 N. Market Street, Madison,NC 27025
Rockingham County Health Department
APS Central Office-Permit File WQ0019753
APS WSRO Files
Winston-Salem Regional Office
585 Waughtown Street Winston-Salem,North Carolina 27107 One
Phone:[phone] FAX:[phone] Customer Service:1-877-623-6748 North Carolina
Internet:http:llportal.ncdenr.orglweblwq Naturally
An Equal Opportunity\Affirmative Action Employer

fl L,CIVcu
N.C. Dept.of ENR
ANNUAL DISTRIBUTION AND MARKETING/SURFACE DISPOSAL CERTIFICATION AND SUMMARY Faall 8 2013
PERMIT #: WQ0019753 FACILITY NAME: Town Of Madsion WTP Winston-Saalem
PHONE: [phone] COUNTY: Rockingham OPERATOR: J. Kevin Yates Regional Office
FACILITY TYPE (please check one): ❑ Surface Disposal (complete Part A(Source(s) and "Residual In" Volume only) and Part C)
Ea Distribution and Marketing(complete Parts A,B,and C)
Was the facility in operation during the past calendar year? ❑ Yes No No If No skip parts A, B, C and certify form below
Part A*: Part B*:
Sources s (include NPDES#if Volume (dry:tons) Recipient Information
Month ( ) Amendment/ Volume (dry
applicable) Bulking Agent Residual In Product Out Name(s) tons) Intended use(s)
January
February
March
April (n'�
May c> .� Ct p 1 t,i
June 1 A
July
August
September
October
November
December
Totals: Annual(dry tons): 0 0 0 •
•.•....•.•........•.......•.•..•...... 0
Amendment(s) used:I Bulking_Agent(s)used:I
* If more space than given is required, please attach additional information sheet(s). ❑ Check box if additional sheet(s) are attached
Part C:
Facility was compliant during calendar year with all conditions of the permit(including but not limited to items 1-3 below) issued by the
Division of Water Quality. ❑ Yes ❑ No If No, please provide a written description why the facility was not compliant.
1. All monitoring was done in accordance with the permit and reported for the year as required and three (3) copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
2. All operation and maintenance requirements were compiled with or, in the case of a deviation,prior authorization was received from the Division of Water
Quality.
3. No contravention of Ground Water Quality Standards occurred at a monitoring well.
"I certify,under penalty of law,that the above information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete. I am aware
t : ere ar ignific enalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
Si a ature of Permi e Date Signature of Preparer** Date
(if different from Permittee) **Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9(r)
DENR FORM DMSDF (11/2005)

ANNUAL DISTRIBUTION AND MARKETING/SURFACE DISPOSAL CERTIFICATION AND SUMMARY FORM
RMIT#: WQ0019753 FACILITY NAME: Town Of Madsion WTP
PHONE: [phone] COUNTY: Rockinham OPERATOR: J. Kevin Yates
FACILITY TYPE (please check one): ❑ Surface Disposal (complete Part A (Source(s)and "Residual In" Volume only) and Part C)
® Distribution and Marketing(complete Parts A,B, and C)
Was the facility in operation during the past calendar year? ❑ Yes No No If No skip parts A,B,C and certify form below
Part A*: Part B*:
Sources s (include NPDES#if Volume(dry tons) Recipient Information
Month ( ) Amendment/ Volume(dry
applicable) Bulking Agent Residual In Product Out Name(s) tons) Intended use(s)
January
February
March
AprilMay 11 1
pply
(9017
June ;
July 1
August
September
October
November K
December
oW N b �
Totals: Annual(dry tons): 0 0 0 0 .~'... "..:3LI
. ..:.
Amendment(s)used:I Bulking Agent(s)used:I Z
* If more space than given is required, please attach additional information sheet(s). ❑ Check box if additional sheet(s)are attached
Part C:
Facility was compliant during calendar year with all conditions of the permit(including but not limited to items 1-3 below) issued-by-the
Division of Water Quality. ❑ Yes ❑ No If No,please provide a written description why the facility was not compliant.
1. All monitoring was done in accordance with the permit and reported for the year as required and three(3)copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
2. All operation and maintenance requirements were compiled with or, in the case of a deviation,prior authorization was received from the Division of Water
Quality.
3. No contravention of Ground Water Quality Standards occurred at a monitoring well.
"I certify, under penalty of law,that the above information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief,true, accurate and complete. I am aware
t re arg.signific. t enalties for submitting false information,including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
•
Si ature of Pe ' ee RECEIVEDfDE NRIDiate Signature of Preparer** Date
J, ,,,i s 4Jiz (if different from Permittee) **Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9(r)
DENR FORM DMSDF(11/2005)
Aniufor Protection Section

AA
RUDERit
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Charles Wakild, P.E. Dee Freeman
Governor Director RECEIVED Secretary
N.C.Dept.of ENR
June5, 2012 JUN 07 2012
Winston-Salem
CERTIFIED MAIL#7008 1300 0000 1106 5789 Regional Office
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Micheal O. Morrison
Town of Madison
120 N. Market Street
Madison,NC 27025
Subject: NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY (NOD-2012-PC-0069)
FAILURE TO SUBMIT ANNUAL REPORT
Permit No. WQ0019753
Town of Madison Residuals Distribution Program .
Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Morrison:
This Notice of Deficiency is being sent to you for failure to submit the 2011 annual report. One
of the requirements of your non-discharge permit is the submittal of an annual report to the
Division of Water Quality by March 1st of each year. As of this date, our records indicate that the
2011 annual report has not been submitted for the subject facility.
Failure to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of your permit may result
in a recommendation of enforcement action, in accordance with North Carolina General Statute
§143-215.6A.
Please respond to this Notice of Deficiency within 15 calendar days of its receipt, either by
submitting three copies of the annual report or records, indicating the report was submitted.
Submit to:
Ed Hardee
Division of Water Quality
Aquifer Protection Section
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,NC 27699-1636
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
1636 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1636
Location:512 N.Salisbury St,Raleigh,North Carolina 27604 One
Phone:[phone]\FAX:[phone] NO Carolina
Internet www.ncwaterqualitv.orq atura!!/
An Equal Opportunity\Affirmative Action Employer

Nothing in this letter should be taken as relieving from you the responsibility for failing to
submit the annual report in a timely manner. A decision as to the appropriateness of an
enforcement action will be made following the receipt of your response.
If you have any questions regarding this letter,please contact Ed Hardee of our Central Office
staff at(919) 807-6319.
Sincerely,
Jon Risgaard, Supervisor
Land Application Unit
cc:
Permit Files 9753

S Event Data Sheet
Event# 586
Section APS
Date 10/24/2011
Status Closed
Staff Derek Denard
Time Spent(Minutes) 10
First Name Kevin
Last Name Yates
Phone Number [phone]
Fax Number
Street
City
County Rockingham
Event Category Residuals
Event Category Other
Event Affiliation Other
Event Affiliation Other non ORC permit contact
Phone Call ❑�
Email/Fax ❑
Mail Ltr ❑
Referral ❑
Walk-In ❑
Meeting ❑
Comments He got a copy of the annual report review. Said he was not the WTP
ORC. Had a question about the annual reports being late. Told him they
were noted as late and that there was no violation for this. Talked to him
about submitting the cover page for Distribution and marketing Cert.
form.
Monday,October 24,2011 Page 1 of 1

PHONE LOG
Derek C. Denard
Environmental Specialist
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Division of Water Quality,Aquifer Protection Section
El Call Made Date: Time:
❑ Left Message Date: Time:
® Call or Message Received Date: 10/24/11 Time: -2:45pm
[' Call Returned Date: Time:
❑ Complaint El Non-Compliance Reporting ® Information Request El Inspection
Subject: Madison Recon Inspection
Facility: Madison WTP
Permit: WQ0019753
Name of Caller or Contact Person: Kevin Yates
Did caller ask to remain anonymous?YES ❑ NO El N/A
Affiliation: WTP operator
Mailing Address:
Site Address:
Phone(Work): 336-427-3971 Phone(Cell): Phone(Residence):
Complaint/Incident
Source of Pollution:
Nature of Complaint/Incident:
Surface Water Impact: YES ❑ NO ❑ N/A ❑
Amount Spilled:
Time/Date Begin:
Time/Date End:
Action Taken:
Referred to/Investigator:
Summary: He got a copy of the annual report review. Said he was not the WTP ORC. Had a
question about the annual reports being late. Told him they were noted as late and that there
was no violation for this. Talked to him about submitting the cover page for Distribution and
marketing Cert.form.

Aitrila
A d t kie
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
October 14,2011
Micheal 0 Morrison
Town of Madison
120 N Market St
Madison NC 27025
SUBJECT: Annual Report Review
Town of Madison
Town of Madison Residuals Distribution Program
Permit No: WQ0019753
Rockingham County
Dear Mr.Morrison:
Enclosed please find a copy of the Annual Report Review conducted on October 14,2011. The review was conducted by
Derek Denard of the Winston-Salem Regional Office. The Annual Report was reviewed for the years 2009 and 2010,
which were received on August 17, 2010 and June 20,2011. The facility was found to be in compliance with permit
WQ0019753. •
Please refer to the enclosed report form for additional observations and comments. If you or your staff have any
questions, please call Derek Denard at 336-771-5286.
Sincerely,
r
Sherri V. Knight,P.E.
�.�� d��, l Regional Supervisor,Aquifer Protection Section
cc: Kevin Yates,W RC
RockinghamCounty Health Department
APS Central Office-Permit File WQ0019753
IMP ha.
Winston-Salem Regional Office
585 Waughtown Street,Winston-Salem,North Carolina 27107 One
Phone:[phone] FAX:[phone] Customer Service:1-877-623-6748 NorthCarolina
Internet http://portal.ncdenr.orglweb/wq Naturally
An Equal Opportunity\Affirmative Action Employer

State of North Carolina O�OF W AT F9QG
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Purdue, Governor
Dee Freeman, Secretary
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Annual Report Review Distribution/Surface Disposal of Residuals
Facility Name: Town of Madison WTP Reporting Period: 2009&2010
Permit No.: WO0019753 Counties that land is permitted for:N/A
Maximum Dry Tons Per Year: 1,600 Dry tons distributed: 772
Acres permitted: N/A Acres applied on: N/A
Dry tons per acre applied: N/A
Number of fields in permit: N/A Number of fields applied on: N/A
Monitoring Frequency: <319(1/Year)0 z319—<1,650(1/Quarter)® z1,650—<16,500(1/60Days)0 z16,500(1/,Month)0
Monitoring Frequency for TCLP: Annually ® Permit Cycle ❑
Groundwater monitoring: DYes ❑No
1. Class A Annual Distribution and Marketing/Surface Disposal Certification Form
Was a certification form submitted? ®Yes ❑No DNA ONE
Was distribution conducted during the reported period? ZYes ❑No DNA ONE
Were the distributions with the permitted amount? ZYes ❑No DNA ONE
Were recipients information listed? ®Yes ❑No DNA ONE
Did it indicate compliance? ZYes ❑No DNA ONE
Was form complete? ZYes ❑No DNA LINE
Was it signed by the appropriate people? ZYes ❑No DNA ONE
Comments: No application occurred in 2010.
2. Monitoring
Were the analyses conducted at the required frequency? ®Yes ❑No DNA ONE
Was an analyses taken for each source that was distributed? ®Yes ❑No DNA ONE
Were the metals analyses reported on the Residual Sampling Summary Form? ZYes ❑No DNA ENE
Were the results reported in mg/kg? ZYes ❑No DNA ONE
Were the pH's 6.0 or greater for each residual sample? ®Yes ❑No DNA ONE
Were the heavy metals within ceiling concentration permit limits? ®Yes DNo DNA ONE
Were the lab analyses attached? ®Yes ❑No DNA ONE
Were all the required parameters tested? ZYes ❑No DNA ONE
Was TCLP analysis conducted? ®Yes ❑No DNA ONE
Were the TCLP contaminants within regulatory limits? ZYes ❑No DNA ONE
Was a corrosivity, ignitability, and reactivity analysis conducted? ZYes ❑No DNA ONE
Comments:
a: ,1
3. Pathogen and Vector Attraction Reduction .,.
Was a signed copy of the Pathogen and Vector Attraction Reduction Form submitted? "' Yes -❑No ZNA ONE
Did the form provide all the required information? Oyes ❑No . ®NA ENE
Was pathogen and vector attraction reduction documented? Dyes ❑No ®NA ENE
Was pathogen/vector demonstrated according to 40 CFR Part 503? ❑Yes ❑No ZNA ENE
Comments:
4. General
Was the report in the proper format? ®Yes ❑No DNA ONE
Was the annual report complete? ®Yes ❑No DNA ONE
Was the report submitted on time? Dyes ZNo DNA ONE
Comments: The 2009 and 2010 annual report were received on August 17,2010 and June 20, 2011, respectively.

RECEIVED —'
N.C.Dept.of ENR
ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION CERTIFICATION FORM
JUN 2 9 2011
Permit Number: WQ00019753 County: Rockingham Year: 2010 Winston-Salem
Facility Name (as stio\n on permit): Town of Madison WTP Regional Office
Land Application Operator: Precision Land Application, Inc. Phone#: [phone]
rr
Land application of residuals as allowed by the above permit occurred during the past calendar year
❑ YES ® NO. If NO,skip Part I and Part II and proceed to the certification. Also, if residuals were generated but r •R
land applied,please attach an explanation of how the residuals were handled. z B C
Partl o 5 0
• Total number of application fields inpermit: o
• Total number of fields land application occurred during the year: — u
• Total amount of dry tons applied during the year for all application sites: g
• Total number of acres land application occurred during the year:
Part II
Facility was compliant during calendar year with all conditions of the land application permit
(Including but not limited to items 1-12 below) issued by the Division of Water Quality
El YES El NO.
IF NO PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN DESCRIPTION WHY THE FACILITY WAS NOT COMPLIANT,THE DATES,AND
EXPLAIN CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN.
1. Only residuals approved for this permit were applied to the permitted sites.
2. Soil pH was adjusted as specified in the permit and lime was applied (if needed)to achieve a soil
pH of at least 6.0 or the limit specified in the permit.
3. Annual soils analysis was performed on each site receiving residuals during the past calendar
year and three (3) copies of laboratory results are attached.
4. Annual TCLP analysis was performed and three (3) copies of certified laboratory results are
attached.
5. All other monitoring was performed in accordance with the permit and reported during the year as
required and three (3) copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
6. The facility did not exceed any of the Pollutant Concentration Limits in Table 1 of 40 CFR Part
503.13 or the Pollutant Loading Rates in Table 2 of 40 CFR Part 503.13. (applicable to 4o CFR Part
503 regulated facilities)
7. All general requirements in 40 CFR Part 503.12 and management practices in 40 CFR Part
503.14 were complied with. (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503 regulated facilities)
8. All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with or, in the case of a
deviation, prior authorization was received from the Division of Water Quality.
9. No contravention of Ground Water Quality Standards occurred at a monitoring well or
explanations of violations are attached to include appropriate actions and remediations.
10.Vegetative cover as specified in the permit was maintained on this site and the crops grown were
removed in accordance with the crop management plan.
11. No runoff of residuals from the application sites into adjacent property or nearby surface waters
has occurred.
12.All buffer requirements as specified on the permit were maintained during each application of
residuals. .
"I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF LAW,THAT THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS,TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
AND BELIEF,TRUE,ACCURATE,AND COMPLETE. I AM AWARE THAT THERE ARE SIGNIFICANT PENALTIES FOR
SUBMITTING FALSE INFORMATION,INCLUDING THE POSSIBILITY OF FINES AND IMPRISONMENT FOR KNOWING
VILOATIONS." ,^
poLc4. Sc�+i-+ 17Lc7 n tit r1 e r /7///
Permittee Name and Title Si nature of Permittee "Date
�7i1� 6—/s-J 1
Signature f reparer Date Signature of Land Applier Date
(if different from Permittee) (If different from Permittee and Preparer)
Note: Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9(r) DEM FORM CF(10/94)

Alik. •
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
'y Eaves Perdue Coleen H.Sullins Dee Freeman
nor Director Secretary
RECEIVED
June 7, 2011 N.C.Dept.of ENR
JUN 14 2011
CERTIFIED MAIL # 7006 2150 0003 5466 8803 Winston-Salem
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Regional Office
Mr. Micheal O. Morrison
Town of Madison
120 North Market Street
Madison, NC 27025
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION (NOV-2011-PC-0342)
FAILURE TO SUBMIT ANNUAL REPORT
Permit No. W00019753
Town of Madison Residuals Distribution Program
Rockingham County
• Dear Mr. Morrison:
This Notice of Violation is being sent to you for failure to submit the 2010 annual report.
One of the requirements of your non-discharge permit is the submittal of an annual
report to the Division of Water Quality by March 1st of each year. As of this date, our
records indicate that the 2010 annual report has not been submitted for the subject
facility.
Failure to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of your permit
may result in the assessment of civil penalties of up to $25,000.00 per violation per day,
in accordance with North Carolina General Statute §143-215.6A.
Please respond to this notice of violation within 15 calendar days of its receipt, either by
submitting three copies of the annual report or records, indicating the report was
submitted. Submit to:
Ed Hardee
Division of Water Quality
Aquifer Protection Section
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
1636 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1636
Location:2728 Capital Boulevard.Raleigh,Nortn Carolina 27604
Phone.[phone] FAX [phone].FAX 2:919 715-6048 Customer Service, 1-877-623-674c Ott. t
interne::www.ncwateraualitv.org C)'"J1 �l" ) lli�`
car jai/l`r
An 5cua'Opoortunit Affirmative Aron Emniover

Nothing in this letter should be taken as relieving from you the responsibility for failing to
submit the annual report in a timely manner. A decision as to the appropriateness of an
enforcement action will be made following the receipt of your response.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Ed Hardee of our Central
Office staff at [phone].
Sincerely,
Jon Risgaard, Supervisor
Land Application Unit
JR:eh
cc: A Mr
Permit Files WQ0019753
Land Application Unit

4617A
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freemar
Governor Director Secretary
July 28, 2010
CERTIFIED MAIL # 7009 0820 0001 0529 8698
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Micheal O. Morrison
Town of Madison
120 North Market Street
Madison, NC 27025
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION (NOV-2010-PC-0892)
FAILURE TO SUBMIT ANNUAL REPORT
Permit No. WQ0019753
Town of Madison Residuals Distribution Program
Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Morrison:
This Notice of Violation is being sent to you for failure to submit the 2009 annual report.
One of the requirements of your non-discharge permit is the submittal of an annual
• report to the Division of Water Quality by March 1st of each year. As of this date, our
records indicate that the.2009 annual report has not been submitted for the subject
facility.
Failure to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of your permit
may result in the assessment of civil penalties of up to $25,000.00 per violation per day,
in accordance with North Carolina General Statute §143-215.6A.
•
Please respond to this notice of violation within 15 calendar days of its receipt, either by
submitting three copies of the annual report or records, indicating the report was
submitted. Submit to:
Ed Hardee
Division of Water Quality
Aquifer Protection Section
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
1636 Mai!Service Center,Raleigh,Nortn Caroline 27699-163•.
Location:2728 Capital Boulevard.Raleigh.Nortn Carolina 2760w One
Phone:[phone] FAX [phone]:FAX 2:919-715-604€`.Customer Berm:1-877-623-6748 North Carolina
Internet:www.ncwateroualitv.orq •
!/aturalll/
An Ecual Opportunity i Affirmative Mctior.Employer a

Nothing in this letter should be taken as relieving from you the responsibility for failing to
submit the annual report in a timely manner. A decision as to the appropriateness of an
enforcement action will be made following the receipt of your response.
If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Ed Hardee of our Central
Office staff at [phone].
Sincerely, (
Jon Risgaard, Supervisor
Land Application Unit
JR:eh
cc:
Permit Files WO0019753
Land Application Unit

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION CERTIFICATION FORM- 9Z
Permit#: WQ0019753 County: Rockingham 11 - Year: 2008
Facility Name(as shown on permit): Town of Madison WTP
Land Application Operator: Precision Land Application, Inc. Phone: [phone]
Land application of residual solids as allowed by the permit occurred during the past calender year?
❑ Yes ❑ No If No, skip Part A, and Part B and proceed to the certification. Also,if residuals were
generated but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the residuals were handled.
Part A:
Total number of application fields in permit:
Total number of fields land application occurred during the year:
Total amount of dry tons applied during the year for all application sites:
Total number of acres land application occurred during the year:
Part B:
Facility was compliant during calendar year with all conditions of the land application permit
(including but not limited to items 1-12 below) issued by the Division of Water Quality. ❑ Yes ❑ No
If no please, provide a written description why the facility was not compliant, the dates, and explain
corrective action taken.
1. Only residuals approved for this permit were applied to the permitted sites.
2. Soil pH was adjusted as specified in the permit and lime was applied (if needed) to achieve a soil pH of at
least 6.0 or the limit specified in the permit.
3. Annual soils analysis were performed on each site receiving residuals during the past calendar year and three
(3)copies of laboratory results are attached.
4. Annual TCLP analysis was performed and three(3) copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
5. All other monitoring was performed in accordance with the permit and reported during the year as required
and three (3)copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
6. The facility did not exceed any of the Pollutant Concentration Limits in Table 1 of 40 CFR Part 503.13 or the
Pollutant Loading Rates in Table 2 of 40 CFR part 503.13 (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503 regulated facilities).
7. All general requirements in 40 CFR Part 503.12 and management practices in 40 CFR Part 503.14 were
complied with(applicable to 40 CFR Part 503 regulated facilities).
1. All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with or, in the case of a deviation,
prior authorization was received from the Division of Water Quality. D[��' \\-''c
No contravention of Ground Water Quality Standards occurred at a monitoring we'il E4ELt46Es 0
violations are attached to include appropriate actions and remediations. N - 6 2009
Vegetative cover as specified in the permit was maintained on this site and the crops grown were removed
in or at n Processing Unit
in accordance with the crop management plan. 'w4Q/ROG
Jo runoff of residuals from the application sites onto adjacent property or nearby surface waters has occurred.
11 buffer requirements as specified on the permit were maintained during each application of residuals.
tify,under penalty of law,that the above information is,to the best of my knowledge and belief,true,
te,and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
ng the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
RECEIVE:.
N.C.Dept.of ENR
+ert F. Scott, Town Manager �� �.f
Name and Title (type or print) FEB 0 2 2009 Signature of Permittee Date
Winston-Salem
'Preparer* Date Signiture of Land Applier Date
rom Permittee) (if different from Permittee and Preparer)
fined in 40 CFR Part 503.9(r)
DENR FORM ACE(5;2003)

AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
Date: October 27, 2008 County: Rockingham
To: Aquifer Protection Section Central Office Permittee: Town of Mad 8n
Central Office Reviewer: Chonticha McDanielProject Name: Town of Madison Residuals
Distribution Program L AL4
Regional Login No: Application No.: WQ0019753
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
1. This application is (check all that apply): ❑New ® Renewal
® Minor Modification❑ Major Modification
❑ Surface Irrigation ❑ Reuse ❑ Recycle ❑ High Rate Infiltration❑ Evaporation/Infiltration Lagoon
❑ Land Application of Residuals ❑ Attachment B included ❑ 503 regulated ❑ 503 exempt
® Distribution of Residuals ❑ Surface Disposal
❑ Closed-loop Groundwater Remediation ❑ Other Injection Wells (including in situ remediation)
Was a site visit conducted in order to prepare this report? ❑ Yes or®No.
a. Date of site visit: October 21, 2008
b. Person contacted and contact information: Bob Branch, Branch Residuals & Soils,LLC, 8646 W. Market
St., Suite 111, Greensboro,NC 27408,phone: [phone]
c. Site visit conducted by: Derek Denard,APS WSRO
d. Inspection Report Attached: ❑ Yes or ®No.
2. Is the following information entered into the BIMS record for this application correct?
❑ Yes or❑No. If no, please complete the following or indicate that it is correct on the current application.
For Treatment Facilities:
a. Location: 403 Lindsey Bridge Road
b. Driving Directions: From US-158 E: At Stokesdale continue on BELEWS CREEK RD(NC-65) - go 0.1
mi. Turn Left on ELLISBORO RD - go 7.5 mi. Bear Left on RIERSON RD - go 2.3 mi. Turn Right on
LINDSEY BRIDGE RD. Cross the Dan River and WTP should be on the Right before reaching US
311.
c. USGS Quadrangle Map name and number: Mayodan,NC
d. Latitude: 36 22'45.53" Longitude: 79 59' 00.65"
e. Regulated Activities/Type of Wastes(e.g., subdivision, food processing, municipal wastewater):
For Disposal and Injection Sites:
(If multiple sites either indicate which sites the information applies to, copy and paste a new section into the
document for each site, or attach additional pages for each site)
a. Location(s): N/A
b. Driving Directions: N/A
c. USGS Quadrangle Map name and number: N/A
d. Latitude: N/A Longitude: N/A
FORM: Madison WQ0019753 APSRSR 0904.doc 1

AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
II. NEW AND MAJOR MODIFICATION APPLICATIONS(this section not needed for renewals or minor
modifications,skip to next section)
Description Of Waste(S)And Facilities
1. Please attach completed rating sheet. Facility Classification:
2. Are the new treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal system?
❑ Yes ❑No ❑N/A. If no, please explain:
3. Are the new site conditions (soils, topography, depth to water table, etc) consistent with what was reported by
the soil scientist and/or Professional Engineer? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑N/A. If no, please explain:
4. Does the application (maps, plans, etc.) represent the actual site (property lines, wells, surface drainage)? ❑
Yes ❑No ❑N/A. If no,please explain:
5. Is the proposed residuals management plan adequate and/or acceptable to the Division. ❑ Yes ❑ No El
N/A. If no,please explain:
6. Are the proposed application rates for new sites(hydraulic or nutrient)acceptable?
❑Yes ❑No ❑N/A. If no, please explain:
7. Are the new treatment facilities or any new disposal sites located in a 100-year floodplain?
❑ Yes ❑ No El N/A. If yes, please attach a map showing areas of 100-year floodplain and please explain
and recommend any mitigative measures/special conditions in Part IV:
8. Are there any buffer conflicts (new treatment facilities or new disposal sites)? ❑ Yes or❑No. If yes, please
attach a map showing conflict areas or attach any new maps you have received from the applicant to be
incorporated into the permit:
9. Is proposed and/or existing groundwater monitoring program (number of wells, frequency of monitoring,
monitoring parameters, etc.) adequate? El Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A. Attach map of existing monitoring well
network if applicable. Indicate the review and compliance boundaries. If No, explain and recommend any
changes to the groundwater monitoring program:
10. For residuals, will seasonal or other restrictions be required? El Yes El No ❑ N/A If yes, attach list of sites
with restrictions(Certification B?)
III. RENEWAL AND MODIFICATION APPLICATIONS(use previous section for new or major modification
systems)
Description Of Waste(S)And Facilities
1. Are there appropriately certified ORCs for the facilities? ❑ Yes or❑No.
Operator in Charge: N/A Certificate#:
Backup-Operator in Charge: N/A Certificate#:
FORM: Madison WQ0019753 APSRSR 0904.doc 2

AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
2. Is the design, maintenance and operation (e.g. adequate aeration, sludge wasting, sludge storage, effluent
storage, etc) of the treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal system? ❑ Yes or ❑No.
If no, please explain: YES
3. Are the site conditions (soils, topography, depth to water table, etc) maintained appropriately and adequately
assimilating the waste? ❑ Yes or❑No. If no, please explain: N/A
4. Has the site changed in any way that may affect permit (drainage added, new wells inside the compliance
boundary, new development, etc.)? If yes, please explain:N/A
5. Is the residuals management plan for the facility adequate and/or acceptable to the Division?
® Yes or❑No. If no, please explain:
6. Are the existing application rates (hydraulic or nutrient) still acceptable? ❑ Yes or ❑ No. If no, please
explain: N/A
7. Is the existing groundwater monitoring program (number of wells, frequency of monitoring, monitoring
parameters, etc.) adequate? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A. Attach map of existing monitoring well network if
applicable. Indicate the review and compliance boundaries. If No, explain and recommend any changes to the
groundwater monitoring program:
8. Will seasonal or other restrictions be required for added sites? ❑ Yes ❑No ®N/A If yes, attach list of sites
with restrictions (Certification B?)
9. Are there any buffer conflicts (treatment facilities or disposal sites)? ❑ Yes or ❑ No. If yes, please attach a
map showing conflict areas or attach any new maps you have received from the applicant to be incorporated
into the permit: N/A
10. Is the description of the facilities, type and/or volume of waste(s) as written in the existing permit correct?
Yes or❑No. If no, please explain:
11. Were monitoring wells properly constructed and located? ❑ Yes or ❑ No ® N/A. If no, please explain:
12. Has a review of all self-monitoring data been conducted (GW, NDMR, and NDAR as applicable)? ❑ Yes or
❑ No ❑N/A. Please summarize any findings resulting from this review: The Permittee received an NOV
on June 11, 2008 for a late or missing annual report. The annual report was received on June 14, 2008. No
distribution of solids had been done as far back as the 2002 annual report that is on file in the WSRO.
13. Check all that apply: ❑ No compliance issues; ® Notice(s) of violation within the last permit cycle; ❑
Current enforcement action(s) ❑ Currently under SOC; ❑ Currently under JOC; ❑ Currently under
moratorium. If any items checked, please explain and attach any documents that may help clarify
answer/comments (such as NOV,NOD etc): See response to question 12 above.
14. Have all compliance dates/conditions in the existing permit, (SOC, JOC, etc.) been complied with? ® Yes
❑ No ❑Not Determined ❑N/A.. If no, please explain:
15. Are there any issues related to compliance/enforcement that should be resolved before issuing this permit? ❑
Yes or®No ❑N/A. If yes, please explain:
FORM: Madison WQ0019753 APSRSR 0904.doc 3

AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
FORM: Madison WQ0019753 APSRSR 0904.doc 4

AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
IV. INJECTION WELL PERMIT APPLICATIONS(Complete these two sections for all systems that use injection
wells, including closed-loop groundwater remediation effluent injection wells, in situ remediation injection wells,and heat
pump injection wells.)
Description Of Well(S) And Facilities—New, Renewal,And Modification
1. Type of injection system:
❑ Heating/cooling water return flow(5A7)
❑ Closed-loop heat pump system(5QM/5QW)
❑ In situ remediation(5I)
❑ Closed-loop groundwater remediation effluent injection (5L/"Non-Discharge")
❑ Other(Specify:
2. Does system use same well for water source and injection? ❑ Yes ❑No
3. Are there any potential pollution sources that may affect injection?❑ Yes ❑No
What is/are the pollution source(s)? . What is the distance of the injection well(s)from the pollution
source(s)? ft.
4. What is the minimum distance of proposed injection wells from the property boundary? ft.
5. Quality of drainage at site: ❑ Good ❑ Adequate ❑ Poor
6. Flooding potential of site: ❑ Low ❑ Moderate ❑ High
7. For groundwater remediation systems, is the proposed and/or existing groundwater monitoring program
(number of wells, frequency of monitoring, monitoring parameters, etc.) adequate? ❑ Yes ❑No. Attach
map of existing monitoring well network if applicable. If No, explain and recommend any changes to the
groundwater monitoring program:
8. Does the map presented represent the actual site (property lines, wells, surface drainage)? ❑ Yes or❑ No. If
no or no map, please attach a sketch of the site. Show property boundaries,buildings, wells,potential pollution
sources, roads, approximate scale, and north arrow.
Injection Well Permit Renewal And Modification Only:
1. For heat pump systems, are there any abnormalities in heat pump or injection well operation(e.g. turbid water,
failure to assimilate injected fluid, poor heating/cooling)?
❑ Yes ❑No. If yes, explain:
2. For closed-loop heat pump systems,has system lost pressure or required make-up fluid since permit issuance
or last inspection? ❑ Yes ❑No. If yes, explain:
3. For renewal or modification of groundwater remediation permits(of any type),will
continued/additionaUmodified injections have an adverse impact on migration of the plume or management of
the contamination incident? ❑ Yes ❑No. If yes, explain:
4. Drilling contractor: Name:
FORM: Madison WQ0019753 APSRSR 0904.doc 5

AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
Address:
Certification number:
5. Complete and attach Well Construction Data Sheet.
FORM: Madison WQ0019753 APSRSR 0904.doc 6

AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
V. EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Provide any additional narrative regarding your review of the application.: Both storage lagoons were concrete
lined. A triangular shaped lagoon has a 0.47 million-galloon capacity for storage of backwash water. A
rectangular lagoon with a storage capacity of 0.41 is used to store and dewater solids. The rectangular lagoon
was over grown with vegetation and will have to be cleared before solids are removed for distribution. Water is
removed from black perforated pipes (-3 feet diameter)with holes throughout that have been placed vertically
into the solids down to the liner. This lagoon has nearly reach full capacity and needs to be cleaned out soon.
Modification request for 1600 dry tons should be adequate to remove these solids. The solids contained small
grains (<1mm) of Anthracite (coal) from the carbon filters in the WTP..
2. Attach Well Construction Data Sheet- if needed information is available
3. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes ®No. If yes, please explain
briefly.
4. List any items that you would like APS Central Office to obtain through an additional information request.
Make sure that you provide a reason for each item:
Item Reason
5. List specific Permit conditions that you recommend to be removed from the permit when issued. Make sure
that you provide a reason for each condition:
Condition Reason
6. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules that you recommend to be included in the permit when
issued. Make sure that you provide a reason for each special condition:
Condition Reason
7. Recommendation: ❑ Hold, pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office; ❑ Hold,
pending review of draft permit by regional office; ❑ Issue upon receipt of needed additional information;
Issue; ❑ Deny. If deny, please state reasons:
FORM: Madison WQ0019753 APSRSR 0904.doc 7

AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION REGIONAL STAFF REPORT
8. Signature of report re arer(s): C
P P
Signature of APS regional supervisor: G..�„ am. I-4_.
Date: %//)/1,f
ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS
FORM: Madison WQ0019753 APSRSR 0904.doc 8

AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION -
RECEIVED
APPLICATION REVIEW REQUEST FORM Dept of LW,
Date: October 8,2008
Regional Office
To: ❑ Landon Davidson,ARO-APS ❑ David May,WaRO-APS
❑ Art Barnhardt,FRO-APS ❑ Charlie Stehman,WiRO-APS
❑ Andrew Pitner,MRO-APS ® Sherri Knight, WSRO-APS
❑ Jay Zimmerman, RRO-APS
From: Chonticha McDaniel , Land Application Unit
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
A. Permit Number: WO0019753
B. Owner: Town of Madison
C. Facility/Operation: Town of Madison Residuals Distribution Program
❑ Proposed ® Existing ❑ Facility ® Operation
D. Application:
1. Permit Type: ❑ Animal ❑ Surface Irrigation ❑ Reuse ❑ H-R Infiltration
❑ Recycle ❑ I/E Lagoon ❑ GW Remediation(ND)
❑ UIC - (5QW)closed loop water only geothermal
For Residuals: ❑ Land App. ® D&M ❑ Surface Disposal
❑ 503 ® 503 Exempt ❑ Animal
2. Project Type: ❑ New ❑ Major Mod. ❑ Minor Mod. ❑ Renewal ® Renewal w/Mod.
E. Comments/Other Information: ❑ I would like to accompany you on a site visit.
Attached, you will find all information submitted in support of the above-referenced application for your
review, comment, and/or action. Within 30 calendar days,please take the following actions:
® Return a Completed Form APSARR.
❑ Attach Well Construction Data Sheet.
❑ Attach Attachment B for Certification by the LAPCU.
❑ Issue an Attachment B Certification from the RO*.
* Remember that you will be responsible for coordinating site visits, reviews, as well as additional
information requests with other RO-APS representatives in order to prepare a complete Attachment B for
certification. Refer to the RPP SOP for additional detail.
When you receive this request form, please write your name and dates in the spaces below, make a copy
of this sheet, and return it to the appropriate Central Office-Aquifer Protection Section contact person
listed above.
RO-APS Reviewer: e trek CA,.&-v Date: 13 o9 p
FORM: APSARR 02/06 Page 1 of 1

�pF W A 7F9P Michael F.Easley,Governor
William G.Ross Jr.,Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H.Sullins Director
Division of Water Quality
October 7,2008
Michael Morrison
Town of Madison
120 North Market Street
Madison,NC 27025
Subject: Acknowledgement of Application No. WQ0019753
Town of Madison Residuals Distribution Program
Distribution of Residual Solids(503 exempt)System
Rockingham
Dear Mr. Morrison:
The Aquifer Protection Section of the Division of Water Quality(Division)acknowledges receipt of your permit
application and supporting materials on September 24,2008.This application package has been assigned the number
listed above and will be reviewed by Chonticha McDaniel.
The reviewer will perform a detailed review and contact you with a request for additional information if necessary.
To ensure the maximum efficiency in processing permit applications,the Division requests your assistance in
providing a timely and complete response to any additional information requests.
Please be aware that the Division's Regional Office,copied below,must provide recommendations prior to final
action by the Division.Please also note at this time,processing permit applications can take as long as 60-90 days
after receipt of a complete application.
If you have any questions,please contact Chonticha McDaniel at 919-715-6188,or via e-mail at
[e-mail]. If the reviewer is unavailable,you may leave a message,and they will respond
promptly. Also note that the Division has reorganized.To review our new organizational chart,go to
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/documents/dwq orgchart.pdf.
PLEASE REFER TO THE ABOVE APPLICATION NUMBER WHEN MAKING INQUIRIES ON THIS
PROJECT.
Sincerely,
C . 600at
for Ted Bush,PE
Section Chief
cc:
Robert Branch(Branch Residuals&Soils,LLC-311 B South Westgate Drive,Greensboro,NC 27407)
Permit Application File WQ0019753 One
No,Naturally
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Internet:www.ncwaterqualitv.orq Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh,NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer-50%Recycled/10%Post Consumer Paper Customer Service: [phone]

PERMIT MODIFICATION FOR THE
DISTRIBUTION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
WQ0019753
TOWN OF MADISON
MADISON WATER
TREATMENT PLANT RESIDUALS
MADISON,NORTH CAROLINA
Prepared For:
Town of Madison
120 North Market Street
Madison,NC 27025
Prepared By:
#44(
Branch Residuals&Soils,LLC
311 B South Westgate Drive
Greensboro,North Carolina 27407
September,2008

rTh11' 4,2- 6* •44it
5f7r
,
)5--7
/e ,4
i 9 'I-

i10116, BRANCH RESIDUALS & SOILS, LLC
311 B South Westgate Drive • Greensboro,NC 27407
PHONE[phone] • FAX[phone]
September 23, 2008
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality/Aquifer Protection Section
Land Application Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1636
Attention: Mr. Jon Risgaard
Reference: PERMIT MODIFICATION DISTRIBUTION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
Permit WQ0019753
Town of Madison
Madison,North Carolina
BR&S Job No. 2008-75
Dear Mr. Risgaard:
Branch Residuals & Soils, LLC is under contract with the Town of Madison to renew and modify
Permit WQ0019753. This permit is significantly late for renewal but all fees have been kept
current. The Town of Madison plans to increase the dry tons limit from 100 to 1600 to account for
the current storage of alum residuals generated from the facility's water treatment plant. This
material will be given away as a soil amendment to local farmers, used as landfill cover, or used as
fill dirt. This material is generated from water treatment plant processes and has no domestic
wastewater components.
Please contact me immediately if you require additional information or have questions in the review
of the permit application.
Sincerely,
Robert T. Branch, L. S. S.
Project Manager
cc: Mr. Micheal O. Morrison—Town of Madison,Director Public Utilities

1478 - NC DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY, 058867
REFERENCE DATE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT DISCOUNT NET PAID
REQ. 8/29/08 08/29/08 245 . 00 0 . 00 245 . 00
30-830.4501 245 . 00
CHECK # DATE GROSS DISCOUNT CHECK AMOUNT
58867 09/02/08 245 . 00 0 . 00 245 . 00
MAo� 058867
F S FIRST CITIZENS BANK 66-30/531
i .. °Z TOWN OF MADISON MADISON,NC27025 688
3' :.i. Ili GENERAL ACCOUNT
0', "" ' Z 120 N.MARKET STREET
~ ,te f) MADISON,NC 27025
cy4ereREo�g�� DATE CHECK NO. CHECK AMOUNT
09/02/2008 58867 $245 . 00
PAY ****245 DOLLARS AND 00 CENTS **** i
(CASH WITHIN 180 DAYS
THIS DISBURSEMENT HAS BEEN APPROVED AS REQUIRED BY 3
THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BUDGET AND FISCAL CONTROL ACT.
PAY NC DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY, `
TO THE AQUIFIER SECTION
ORDER NANCE DIRECTOR
OF /
TREASURER
‘.... "'P./
1110 5886 ?II' 1:0 5 3 LOO 3001:00668 130 5 2 7911'

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section No. Title
I DISTRIBUTION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS APPLICATION FORM
II RESIDUALS SOURCE CERTIFICATION ATTACHMENT
HA Vicinity Map
IIB Process Flow Diagram and Narrative
HC Justification of Residuals Production Rate
HD Sampling Plan
HE Residual Analytical Reports
III MANAGEMENT PLAN
MA Overview of Process and Residual Solids Handling
IIIB Distribution Methods for Reuse
MC Transportation and Logistics
MD Monitoring and Recordkeeping
IIIE Leachate Collection
IV PRODUCT INFORMATION SHEET
V SPILL CONTROL PLAN
VI TOWN OF MADISON WATER PLANT RESIDUALS RECEIPT FORM
VII APPLICATION RATES

SECTION I
DISTRIBUTION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS APPLCIATION FORM

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
DISTRIBUTION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
(FORM: DRS 070807)
The Division of Water Quality will not accept this application unless all the instructions are followed. Plans
and specifications must be prepared in accordance with 15A NCAC 2T.1100,and good engineering practices.
Failure to submit all required items will lead to additional processing and review time.
For more information, visit our web site at:http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/lau/main.html
A. Application Form(All Application Packages):
I Submit one original and two copies of the completed application package. Any changes made to this form will result in
the application being returned. The Division of Water Quality will only accept application packages that have been fully
completed and all applicable items are addressed.
✓ The project name should be consistent on the plans,specifications,etc.
✓ The signing official must meet the criteria stipulated in 15A NCAC 2T.0106(b). An alternate person may be designated
as the signing official,provided that a delegation letter from a person who meets the referenced criteria is submitted. The
delegation letter does not have to be resubmitted if the signing official has not changed since the last permitting action
associated with this residuals land application program.
✓ If this project involves a modification of an existing permit,submit one copy of the existing permit.
✓ Please submit this application form at least 180 days prior to the expiration date on the existing permit,or 90 days prior
to operation of proposed facility(ies)for application packages involving new or changes to treatment and storage units.
B. Application Fee(New and Major Modification Application Packages):
✓ For new permits submit a check in the amount of$1,310 if over or equal 3,000 dry tons per year are generated for
disposal or$810 if less 3,000 dry tons per year are generated for disposal,made payable to:North Carolina Department
of Environment and Natural Resources(NCDENR). Major modification fee are$395 and$245,respectively.
C. Cover Letter(All Application Packages):
✓ Submit a cover letter, which lists all item and attachments included in the application package as well as a brief project
description.
✓ If necessary for clarity, include attachments to the application form. Such attachments will be considered part of the
application package and should be numbered to correspond to the section to which they refer.
D. Detailed Plans and Specifications(Application Packages Involving New or Changes to Treatment and Storage Units):
✓ Submit three sets of detailed plans and specifications signed, sealed, and dated by a NC Professional Engineer per 15A
NCAC 2T .1104(a). Specifications for standard equipment may only be omitted for municipalities with approved
standard specifications,but use of the standard specifications must be noted on each sheet of the plans.
✓ Plans must include the following minimum items:a general location map,a topographic map,plan and profile view of the
residuals treatment and storage units as well as the proximity of the residuals treatment and storage units to other utilities
and natural features within 500 feet of all treatment and storage facilities,and detail drawings of all items pertinent to the
residuals treatment and storage units. Depict minimum separations required in 15A NCAC 2T.1108(a)on the plans.
✓ Specifications must include, at a minimum, the following for all items pertinent to residuals treatment and storage units:
description of materials to be used, methods of construction, quality of construction testing procedures to ensure the
integrity of the final product in accordance with 15A NCAC 2T.1104(a)(2)(B),including leakage and pressure testing as
appropriate.
✓ Plans and specifications must not be labeled with preliminary phrases (e.g., FOR REVIEW ONLY, NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION,etc.)that indicate that they are anything other than final plans and specifications. However,the plans
and specifications may be labeled with the phrase:FINAL DESIGN—NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION.
E. Engineering Calculations(Application Packages Involving New or Changes to Treatment and Storage Units):
✓ Submit three copies of all design calculations signed, sealed, and dated by a NC Professional Engineer per 15A NCAC
2T.1104(a).
***INSTRUCTIONS CONTINUE ON NEXT PAGE***
FORM: DRS 070807 Page 1 of 6 Attachment Order 1

F. Environmental Assessments(May be Required—See 15A NCAC 1 C.0300):
✓ Submit one copy of the Findings of No Significant Impact (FONSI) or Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Also,
include information on any mitigating factor(s) from the Environmental Assessment(EA)that impact the construction of
the residuals treatment and storage facilities. An EA may also be required for private systems if any public funds and/or
lands are used for the construction of the subject facilities.
G. Residuals Source Information(All Application Packages):
✓ Attach FORM:RSCA(Residuals Source Certification Attachment)and all associated documentation.
✓ FORM:RSCA can be downloaded at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/lau/applications.html
FORM: DRS 10-06 Page 2 of 6 Attachment Order 1

RECEIVED/DENR
�te
DVVQ
State of North Carolina Aquifer Protection ction Section
Department of Environment and Natural Resoursgp 24 2008
Division of Water Quality
DISTRIBUTION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS
(FORM: DRS 070807)
(THIS FORM MAYBE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
Application Number: (to be completed by DWQ)
L OWNERSHIP INFORMATION:
1. Specify whether the process facility is owned by:
❑ County ❑ Federal: ® Municipal; ❑ State: 0 Non-Government
2. Owners name(please specify the name of the municipality,corporation,individual,etc).
Town of Madison
Mailing address: 120 North Market Street
City: Madison State: NC Zip: 27025
Physical address: 120 North Market Street
City: Madison State: NC Zip: 27025
Telephone number: ( 336 ) 427-0221 Facsimile number: ( 336 ) 427-2565
E-mail address: [e-mail]
3. Signing official's name and title:(See Instruction A)
Mr.Micheal O.Morrison,Director Public Utilities
Mailing address: 120 North Market Street
City: Madison State: NC Zip: 27025
Physical address: 120 North Market Street
City: Madison State: NC Zip: 27025
Telephone number: Facsimile number: ( 336 ) 427-2565
E-mail address: [e-mail]
IL PERMIT INFORMATION:
1. Application is for: ❑ new, ® modified, ® renewed permit(check all that apply).
2. Fee Submitted: $245.00 (See Instruction B)
3. If this application is being submitted to renew or modify an existing permit,provide the following:
Permit number WQ0019753 (please attach a copy of the existing permit).
Most recent issuance date March 4,2002 ,and the expiration date February 28,2007
FORM: DRS 10-06 Page 3 of 6 Attachment Order 1

I
III. FACILITY INFORMATION:
1. Name of facility where residuals are processed:
Town of Madison
Physical address: 403 Lindsey Bridge Road
City: Madison State: NC Zip: 27025
Telephone number ( 336 ) 427-3971 Facsimile number: ( )
County where facility is located: Rockingham
Latitude: 36°22'45.53"N Longitude: 79°59'00.65"W of residual process facility.
2. Facility contact(person familiar with residuals preparation):
Mr.Micheal O.Morrison,Director Public Utilities
Mailing address: 120 North Market Street
City: Madison State: NC Zip: 27025
Physical address: 120 North Market Street
City: Madison State: NC Zip: 27025
Telephone number: ( 336 ) 427-0221 Facsimile number: ( 336 ) 427-2565
E-mail address: [e-mail]
3. Program Contact person and/or consulting firm who prepared application(If different from the above):
Branch Residuals&Soils,LLC
Mailing address: 311 B South Westgate Drive
City: Greensboro State: NC Zip: 27407
Physical address: 311 B South Westgate Drive
City: Greensboro State: NC Zip: 27407
Telephone number: ( 336 ) 510-0340 Facsimile number: ( 336 ) 510-0341
E-mail address: [e-mail]
4. Is the residual process facility also the generator ® Yes ❑ No
5. If the residuals process facility is not the same as the generator,please specify delivery frequency and quantity of residual to
be processed: Not Applicable
6. Length of residuals storage at facility: 365+ days(the Division requires a minimum of 30 days storage in units
that are separate from treatment systems i.e.not in clarifiers,aeration basins,etc.
IV. RESIDUALS QUALITY INFORMATION:
1. Specify if residuals are regulated under(check one): ❑ 40 CFR Part 503 or ® 40 CFR Part 257.
FORM: DRS 10-06 Page 4 of 6 Attachment Order 1

2. Specify how these residuals will be distributed
❑ sold or given away in bags or other containers; ® lawn(bulk); ® home garden(bulk);
other; Landfill Cover and fill dirt
3. Complete the following if residuals are to be mixed with other materials:
Amounts to be added
Type of Materials per 1.0 dry ton of residuals(dry ton)
Not applicable
4. Approximate amounts of the final product to be distributed 1,600 dry tons per year.
5. Provide a description of the onsite storage management plan for the treated residuals(including estimated average and
maximum storage times prior to distribution): see Attached Documentation
V. ADDITIONAL REQUIRED INFORMATION:
1. Provide a narrative explaining the following:
a. How will the materials be handled and transported from where the residuals were produced to where it will be
treated?
b. How will the residuals be processed/treated(attach process flow diagram).
c. How will leachate collection be handled?
d. Where will the residuals be stored until processed?
e. How will the final product be distributed(packaging)?
2. Attach a marketability statement detailing destinations and approximate amounts of the final product to be distributed.
3. Provide either a label that shall be affixed to the bagged processed residual or an information sheet that shall be
provided to the person who receives the processed residual. The label or information sheet shall contain, at a
minimum,the following information:
a. The name and address of the person who prepared the residual that is sold or given away in a bag or other
container for application to the land.
b. A statement that application of the residual to the land is prohibited except in accordance with the instructions on
the label or information sheet.
c. A statement that the residuals shall not be applied to any site that is flooded,frozen or snow-covered.
d. A statement that adequate procedures shall be provided to prevent surface runoff from carrying any disposed or
stored residuals into any surface waters.
e. Information on all applicable setbacks in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T.1108(b).
f. A statement that the residuals shall be applied at agronomic rates and recommended rates for intended uses.
Professional Engineer's Certification:(Application Packages Involving New or Changes to Treatment and Storage Units)
FORM: DRS 10-06 Page 5 of 6 Attachment Order 1

REuEevF otEoRSe o4
Aq
SEP ;Dc
4 200�
Professional Engineer's Certification:(Application Packages Involving New or Changes to Treatment and Storage Units)
I, ,attest that this application for
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I further attest that to the best of my
knowledge the proposed design has been prepared in accordance with the applicable regulations. Although certain portions of
this submittal package may have been developed by other professionals, inclusion of these materials under my signature and seal
signifies that I have reviewed this material and have judged it to be consistent with the proposed design.
North Carolina Professional Engineer's Seal,Signature,and Date:
Applicant's Certification:
The applicant or any affiliate has not been convicted of an environmental crime, has not abandoned a wastewater facility
without proper closure, does not have an outstanding civil penalty where all appeals have been exhausted or abandoned, are
compliant with active compliance schedule,and do not have any overdue annual fees under Rule 2T.0105.
❑ Yes ® No,Explain:
1, Mr.Micheal O.Morrison,Director Public Works ,attest that this application for Town of Madison WTP
Marketing and Distribution Permit has been reviewed by me and is accurate
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of
this application are not completed and that if all required supporting information and attachments are not included, this
application package will be returned to me as incomplete.
Signature: �.�_. s % �JL4i Date: �72 cj/D-
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE,
INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND MATERIALS,
SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
AQUIFER PROTECTION SECTION
LAND APPLICATION UNIT
By U.S.Postal Service: By Courier/Special Delivery:
1636 MAIL SERVICE CENTER 2728 CAPITAL BOULEVARD
RALEIGH,NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1636 RALEIGH,NORTH CAROLINA 27604
TELEPHONE NUMBER: [phone]
FORM: DRS 070807 Page 6 of 6 Attachment Order

i
I
SECTION II
RESIDUALS SOURCE CERTIFICATION ATTACHMENT

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
IDivision of Water Quality
RESIDUALS SOURCE CERTIFICATION ATTTACHMENT
(FORM:RSCA 070807)
THIS FORMMAYBE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
The Division of Water Quality(Division)will not accept this attachment unless all the instructions are
followed. Failure to submit all required items will lead to additional processing and review time.
For more information, visit our web site at:http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/lau/main.html
INSTRUCTIONS TO THE APPLICANT:
A. Attachment Form:
I Do not submit this attachment form for review without a corresponding residuals program application
form(FORM:NDRLAP,FORM:DRS,or FORM:SDRS).
✓ Any changes to this attachment form will result in the application package being returned.
I For new residuals programs or renewed residuals programs, submit a separate attachment form for each
residuals source-generating facility to be certified for this residuals program.
✓ For modified residuals programs in which any modification to the certified residuals-source generating
facilities is proposed, submit a separate attachment form for only those residuals source-generating facilities
that are affected by the proposed modification.
I The attachment should be organized prior to submission in the following order(i.e.,by facility):
• Attachment Order 2: Residuals Source Certification Attachment(FORM:RSCA).
➢ Attachment Order 2-a: Vicinity map.
➢ Attachment Order 2-b: Process flow diagram and/or narrative.
➢ Attachment Order 2-c: Quantitative justification for residuals production rate.
➢ Attachment Order 2-d: Sampling plan.
➢ Attachment Order 2-e: Laboratory analytical reports and operational data.
B. Residuals Source-Generating Facility Information:
I Attach a vicinity map that shows the location of the facility and meets all of the criteria in the latest version of
the document entitled "Guidance for the Preparation of Vicinity/Buffer Maps for North Carolina Residuals
Permitting Programs."
I Attach a detailed narrative and/or process flow diagram that describes how the residuals are to be generated,
treated,processed,and stored at the facility.
I Attach a quantitative justification for the value provided in Item I. 8. Ensure that the amount of residuals listed
is the maximum amount expected to be generated by the facility for the life of the permit. In addition,ensure
that this amount is equivalent to that which is actually to be land applied, distributed, and/or disposed,
including any chemicals,amendments,or other additives that are added to the residuals during processing.
C. Residuals Quality Information:
I Attach a detailed sampling plan for the residuals source-generating facility. Ensure that the plan identifies
sampling points, sampling frequency, sample type, as well as the Division-certified laboratory to be used. In
addition, ensure that the plan details how the facility and/or the residuals are monitored for any applicable
pathogen reduction and vector attraction reduction requirements. Note that all sampling and monitoring must
be completed on the residuals as they are to be land applied,distributed,and/or disposed.
I Attach reports for all laboratory analyses used to complete this attachment form. Attach documentation that the
facility complies and/or the residuals comply with any applicable pathogen reduction and vector attraction
reduction requirements.
✓ Item II. 3. does not have to be completed for facilities that are less than 0.5 MGD in design flow that treat
100%non-municipal,domestic wastewater only.
✓ Item II. 3. does not have to be completed for facilities that are less than 0.5 MGD in design flow that treat
100%non-municipal,domestic wastewater only.
FORM:RSCA 070807 Page 1 of 8 Attachment Order 2

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
RESIDUALS SOURCE CERTIFICATION ATTTACHMENT
(FORM:RSCA 070807)
THIS FORM MAYBE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
Applicant's name: Town of Madison
Check all that apply: ❑ NEW RESIDUALS PROGRAM ® RENEWED RESIDUALS PROGRAM
® INCREASE ❑ DECREASE the maximum permitted annual dry tonnage for this residuals
source-generating facility certified for this residuals program.
Current: 100 Dry Tons/yr.and proposed: 1,600 Dry Tons/yr.
❑ ADD 0 DELETE this residuals source-generating facility to/from those certified for
this residuals program.
O OTHER Explain:
I. RESIDUALS SOURCE-GENERATING FACILITY INFORMATION(See Instruction B.):
1. Name of facility: Town of Madison—Water Treatment Plant
2. Facility permit holder: Town of Madison
Facility permit holder is(check one): ❑ federal, ❑ state, ® local government,or ❑ private.
Facility permit number. 02-79-030
Facility permit issued by(check one): ❑ Div.of Water Quality, ® Div.of Environmental Health,or
0 other(explain: ).
3. If the facility permit is not issued by the Div.of Water Quality,complete the following:
a. Facility contact person and title: Mr.Micheal O.Morrison,Director Public Utilities
Facility complete mailing address: 120 North Market Street
City: Madison State: NC Zip: 27025
Telephone number: ( 336 ) 427-0221 Facsimile number. ( 336 ) 427-2565
E-Mail address: [e-mail]
b. Facility complete location address: 403 Lindsey Bridge Road
City: Madison State: NC Zip: 27025
Latitude: 36°22'45.53"N and longitude: 79°59'00.65"W
4. County where facility is located: Rockingham
5. Purpose of the facility(check one):
❑ treatment of municipal wastewater, ❑ treatment of 100%domestic wastewater,
® treatment of potable water, ❑ treatment of 100%industrial wastewater,
❑ treatment of industrial wastewater mixed with domestic wastewater,or
(approximate percentages: %industrial and %domestic)
❑ other(explain: ).
FORM:RSCA 070807 Page 2 of 8 Attachment Order 2

6. Does the facility have an approved pretreatment program: ❑ yes ® no.
7. Facility permitted/design flow: 1.5 MGD and facility average daily flow: 0.7 MGD.
8. Average amount of residuals being generated at the facility: 100 dry tons per year.
9. Specify the following regarding treatment and storage volumes available at the facility:
Type and volume of residuals treatment: two lagoons—one triangular with 0.47 MG currently used for
liquids,one rectangular with 0.41 MG currently used for storage of solids.
Type and volume of residuals storage(i.e.,outside of residuals treatment units): None
IL RESIDUALS QUALITY INFORMATION(See Instruction C.):
1. Specify if residuals are regulated under(check one): ❑ 40 CFR Part 503 or ® 40 CFR Part 257.
2. Specify if residuals are intended for(check one):
® Land Application/Distribution(Class A or Equivalent).
Complete all items EXCEPT Items II.4b.,4c.,7b.,and 7c.
❑ Land Application(Class B or Equivalent).
Complete all items EXCEPT Items H.4a.,4c.,7a.,and 7c.
❑ Surface Disposal.
Complete all items EXCEPT Items II.4a.,4b.,5.,7a.,7b.,and 8.
***FORM:RSCA CONTINUES ON NEXT PAGE***
FORM:RSCA 070807 Page 3 of 8 Attachment Order 2

3. Hazardous Waste Determination:Complete the following to demonstrate that the residuals are non-
ha7ardous under RCRA:
a. Are the residuals are listed in 40 CFR§261.31-§261.33: ❑ yes ® no.
If yes,list the number(s):
b. Specify whether or not the residuals exhibit any of the characteristics defined by 40 CFR§261.21-§261.24:
0 yes ® no. Fill in the following tables with the results of the latest toxicity
characteristic leaching procedure(TCLP)analysis as well as those for corrosivity,ignitability,and
reactivity: laboratory: Primary Labs,Inc. and date of analysis: August 8,2008
Passed corrosivity test: ® yes 0 no. pH: 6.58 s.u.(2<pH< 12.5).
Passed ignitability test: ® yes ❑ no. Flashpoint: >140 °F(> 140°F).
Passed reactivity test: ® yes ❑ no. HCN: `1.0 mg/kg(<250)&H2S: <°'05 mg/kg(<25)
TCLP Parameter Limit Result TCLP Parameter Limit Result
(mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L) (mg/L)
Arsenic 5.0 <0.05 Hexachlorobenzene 0.13 <0.01
Barium 100.0 0.326 Hexachloro-1,3-Butadiene 0.5 <0.01
Benzene 0.5 <0.005 Hexachloroethane 3.0 <0.01
Cadmium 1.0 <0.01 Lead 5.0 <0.05
Carbon Tetrachloride 0.5 <0.005 Lindane 0.4 <0.0001
Chlordane 0.03 <0.0005 Mercury 0.2 <0.002
Chlorobenzene 100.0 <0.005 Methoxychlor 10.0 <0.0001
Chloroform 6.0 <0.005 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 200.0 <0.10
Chromium 5.0 <0.02 Nitrobenzene 2.0 <0.01
m-Cresol 200.0 <0.01 Pentachlorophenol 100.0 <0.05
o-Cresol 200.0 <0.01 Pyridine 5.0 <0.02
p-Cresol 200.0 <0.01 Selenium 1.0 <0.05
Cresol 200.0 <0.03 Silver 5.0 <0.02
2,4-D 10.0 <0.01 Tetrachloroethylene 0.7 <0.005
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 7.5 <0.01 Toxaphene 0.5 <0.002
1,2-Dichloroethane 0.5 <0.005 Trichloroethylene 0.5 <0.005
1,1-Dichloroethylene 0.7 <0.005 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 400.0 <0.01
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.13 <0.05 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 2.0 <0.01
Endrin 0.02 <0.0001 2,4,5-TP(Silvex) 1.0 <0.002
Heptachlor and its Hydroxide 0.008 <0.0001 Vinyl Chloride 0.2 <0.01
FORM:RSCA 070807 Page 4 of 8 Attachment Order 2

4. Metals Determination: Complete one of the following tables (i.e., as applicable) to demonstrate that the
residuals do not violate the ceiling concentrations for metals regulated under 15A NCAC 02T.1105:
a. For Class A or Class B: Fill in the following table with the results of the latest analyses(i.e.,on a dry
weight basis)for the following metal parameters: laboratory: A&L Eastern Agricultural Labs
and date of analysis: 8/5/08 Reprinted 9/10/08
Parameter Ceiling Concentration Monthly Average Result
Limits(Class A &Class Cencentration Limits
B) (For Class A Only)
(mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg)
Arsenic 75 41 5.60
Cadmium 85 39 <1.00
Copper 4,300 1,500 35.00
Lead 840 300 16.00
Mercury 57 17 <0.40
Molybdenum 75 n/a <5.00
Nickel 420 420 20.00
Selenium 100 100 <1.00
Zinc 7,500 2,800 72.00
c. For Surface Disposal: Fill in the following table with the results of the latest analyses(i.e.,on a dry
weight basis)for the following metal parameters: laboratory:
and date of analysis:
Closest Distance Arsenic Chromium Nickel
to Property Lines
(meters) (mg/kg) (mg/kg) (mg/kg)
>0 but<25 30 200 210
>25 but<50 34 220 240
>_50 but<75 39 260 270
>75 but< 100 46 300 320
> 100 but< 125 53 360 390
> 125 but< 150 62 450 420
>_ 150 73 600 420
FORM:RSCA 070807 Page 5 of 8 Attachment Order 2

5. Nutrient/Micronutrient Determination: Complete the following:
a. Total solids: 41.85 %.
b. Fill in the following table with the results of the latest analyses(i.e.,on a dry weight basis)for the
following nutrient and micronutrient parameters: laboratory: A&L Eastern Agricultural Labs
and date of analysis: 8/5/08 reprinted on 9/10/08
Result
Parameter (mg/kg, thy weight)
Aluminum 57,400.00
Ammonia-Nitrogen 200.00
Calcium 1,500.00
Magnesium 3,100.00
Nitrate-Nitrite Nitrogen 1.00
pH(Standard Unit) 6.58
Phosphorus 900.00
Potassium 2,300.00
Sodium 600.00
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen 2,500.00
c. Using the results listed in Item H.5b.above,calculate the sodium adsorption ration(SAR): 1.31 .
d. Specify the mineralization rate to be used in calculating the plant available nitrogen(PAN)of the
residuals: 40 %. This rate is a ® default value or ❑ actually established.
If the residuals are not generated from the treatment of municipal or domestic wastewater,explain or
provide technical justification as to why the selected default value is appropriate to be applied to these
residuals:
Calculate the PAN for the residuals(i.e.,on a dry weight basis)and list the results in the following table:
Application Method First Year Five-Year
PAN Maximum Adjusted
PAN
(mg/kg) (mg/kg)
Surface 1,021 1,481
Injection/Incorporation 1,121 1,581
e. Are the residuals are a registered fertilizer with the NC Department of Agriculture and Consumer
Services: ❑ yes ® no. If yes,provide date of registration approval:
the current registration number
and the fertilizer equivalent: %, %,and %.
FORM:RSCA 070807 Page 6 of 8 Attachment Order 2

6. Other Pollutants Determination: Specify whether or not there are any other pollutants of concern in the
residuals and list the results of the latest analyses:
7. Pathouen Reduction Determination: Specify which alternative(s)will be used to meet the pathogen
reduction requirements:
a. For Class A or Equivalent:
❑ A fecal coliform density that is demonstrated to be less than 1,000 MPN per gram of total dry solids.
OR
❑ A salmonella sp. density that is demonstration to be less than 3 MPN per 4 grams of total dry solids.
AND one of the following(except for residuals regulated under 40 CFR Part 257 that are to be distributed):
❑ Alternative 1 [40 CFR§503.32(a)(3)]-Time/Temperature Compliance.
❑ Alternative 2[40 CFR§503.32(a)(4)]-Alkaline Treatment.
El Alternative 3 [40 CFR§503.32(a)(5)]-Prior Testing for Enteric Virus/Viable Helminth Ova.
❑ Alternative 4[40 CFR§503.32(a)(6)]-No Prior Testing for Enteric Virus/Viable Helminth Ova.
❑ Alternative 5 [40 CFR§503.32(a)(7)]-Process to Further Reduce Pathogens(PFRP).
Specify one: ❑ composting, ❑ heat drying, ❑ heat treatment, El pasteurization,
❑ thermophilic aerobic digestion, ❑ beta ray irradiation,or ❑ gamma ray irradiation.
❑ Alternative 6[40 CFR§503.32(a)(8)]-PFRP-Equivalent Process.
Explain:
b. For Class B or Equivalent:
❑ Alternative 1 [40 CFR§503.32(b)(2)]-Fecal Coliform Density Demonstration.
El Alternative 2[40 CFR§503.32(b)(3)]-Process to Significantly Reduce Pathogens(PSRP).
Specify one: El aerobic digestion, El air drying, ❑ anaerobic digestion,
El composting,or ❑ lime stabilization.
❑ Alternative 3 [40 CFR§503.32(b)(4)]-PSRP-Equivalent Process.
Explain:
El Not Applicable-Regulated under 40 CFR Part 257 with NO Domestic Wastewater Contribution.
c. For Surface Disposal:
❑ Alternative for Surface Disposal Units Only[40 CFR§503.33 (b)(11)]-Soil/Other Material Cover.
❑ Select One of the Class A or Equivalent Pathogen Reduction Alternatives in Item II.la.above.
❑ Select One of the Class B or Equivalent Pathogen Reduction Alternatives in Item II.7b.above.
El Not Applicable-Regulated under 40 CFR Part 257 with NO Domestic Wastewater Contribution.
FORM:RSCA 070807 Page 7 of 8 Attachment Order 2

8. Vector Attraction Reduction Determination: Specify which alternative(s)will be used to meet the vector
attraction reduction requirements:
❑ Alternative 1 [40 CFR§503.33 (b)(1)]-38%Volatile Solids Reduction(Aerobic/Anaerobic Digestion).
❑ Alternative 2 [40 CFR§503.33(b)(2)]-40-Day Bench Scale Test(Anaerobic Digestion).
❑ Alternative 3 [40 CFR§503.33(b)(3)]-30-Day Bench Scale Test(Aerobic Digestion).
❑ Alternative 4[40 CFR§503.33(b)(4)]-Specific Oxygen Uptake Rate Test(Aerobic Digestion).
❑ Alternative 5 [40 CFR§503.33(b)(5)]- 14-Day Aerobic Processes.
❑ Alternative 6[40 CFR§503.33(b)(6)]-Alkaline Stabilization.
❑ Alternative 7 [40 CFR§503.33 (b)(7)]-Drying of Stabilized Residuals.
❑ Alternative 8 [40 CFR§503.33(bX8)]-Drying of Unstabilized Residuals.
O Alternative 9 [40 CFR§503.33(b)(9)]-Injection.
❑ Alternative 10[40 CFR§503.33(b)(10)]-Incorporation.
❑ Alternative for Surface Disposal Units Only[40 CFR§503.33(b)(11)]-Soil/Other Material Cover.
❑ Alternatives for Animal Processing Residuals Only:
Specify one: ❑ injection, ❑ incorporation,or ❑ lime addition to raise pH to 10.
® Not Applicable—Non-Biological Residuals with No Domestic Wastewater Contribution
9/11/2008 1:07 PM
FORM:RSCA 070807 Page 8 of 8 Attachment Order 2

&TAT Snut3TA

Nichols Co .�. , \ N
g ;:g bro Cobb m ��� carte tur :°
lii
m� Pem Collins . dy Ca Deca 3
O �_' -" MurphY
CO G
VC ? Mc9e�% Qecatur a m
Bass a
co o
n a '=
e Jaey ` Shady r ? Hunter °-
g.
Q\n i4, ? v
ee co m O m
�� eaver is/ Cr eel ?9, Sunset ? 5
m� Blossom 83 you\a
°^� Tony ce Galloy' ? Cahill
v o
Pt' dR`u�d co �oodlaq�
E
g AS!
Gibson , coo al
�� fern ya�a�a
ci ► si Gay
Pik co
Rflge r. ?.
06'6 a °� m Town of Madison WTP 3.
d' A
�° o Odell \aoAP e
o
°`�° Oro ^�° O �o� Gibson aye�� Ool\Y
T
0
�G'>; °m Todd
°6 Dan River
V\lendY
ten'Rives
ed
o
'reek co
o)
c
c
4)ee a rn
'm
C�ee* c
52'
Rierso,
scale: 1"=1500' Town of Madison Location
Checked By: RTB Water Treatment Plant Map
Drawn By: RTB BRANCH
RESIDUALS
Date: July-08 & SOILS, LLC Project No. 2008-75

Process Flow Diagram and Narrative

Process Flow Diagram and Narrative
The Town of Madison Water Treatment Plant (WTP) (PWSID: 02-79-030) is located at 403
Lindsay Bridge Road in Rockingham County. The WTP is a 1.5 million gallon per day (MGD)
water plant that serves the Town of Madison.
The WTP draws its raw water from the Dan River. This water is pumped to the WTP, where it is
treated with alum then directed into the clarifiers for flocculation. Once flocculation has occurred,
the treated water is sent to a settling basin and on to the anthracite filters where it is injected with
chlorine, and passed to the clear well for storage. Residual solids from the clarifiers and filter
backwash are sent to one of two concrete lined lagoons. The triangular lagoon is currently used for
liquid handling and has a capacity of 0.47 million gallons. The rectangular lagoon has a capacity of
0.41 million gallons and is currently used for solids storage. Solids from the triangular lagoon are
transferred to the rectangular lagoon when buildup occurs following decanting. With discharge of
decant liquids under NPDES NC0085626. The rectangular lagoon has four black plastic perforated
pipes that allow the removal of excess liquids through the NPDES permit.
When the solids get sufficiently high, a land application event will be planned. These solids will
probably be land applied every 2 to 4 years. Prior to each land application event, appropriate
residual solids samples will be collected and sent to a qualified lab.
See following for the diagrams for process flow schematics for the water and solids for the Town of
Madison Water Treatment Plant.

Town of Madison WTP 02-79-030
NPDES NC0085626
Effluent PS Alum Sludge
Settling
410
■ Distribution
Box
Alum Sludge
9
Settling
Backwash
water
Filter
Flocculator 110
Settling Basin
Post Filter
Chemical
Injection
Settling Basin
Flier
Rash —'
mixer
Raw Water
inlet, alum,
caustic and
pre-settling
chlorine
injection Chemical Finished
Storage Water PS
0.75 MG
Clear well
Effluent discharge

Justification of Residuals Production Rate

Justification of Residuals Production Rate
The Town of Madison Water Treatment Plant has one 0.41 million gallon lagoon currently used as
storage and one 0.47 million gallon lagoon used for settling. The 0.41 million gallon lagoon is
currently full and fairly dry and is estimated to have approximately 2000 yards or 1600 dry tons.

=Li$IINduntS

Sampling Plan
The Town of Madison will collect grab samples from the sludge lagoon(s) that are to be cleanout
and ultimately land applied. Fecal and nutrient samples will be collected quarterly. If land
application occurs for the entire lagoon, four samples will be collected and analyzed for that
distribution event. If distribution occurs over a year's time, samples will be collected quarterly. A
TCLP sample will be collected and analyzed every permit cycle.
Prior to each first distribution event, seven independent grab samples of Town of Madison WTP
Residuals will be collected and analyzed for fecal coliform. These samples will be received and
compared to the fecal coliform density standard of 1,000 either by Most Probable Number (MPN)
or Colony Forming Units (CFU). If any sample fails this requirement, the residuals will not be
distributed. Additional sets of fecal samples will be collected as described in the preceding
paragraph.
A mixture of the grab samples collected from the sludge lagoons will be analyzed for both nutrient
and metals. The nutrient and metal sample will be collected annually and analyzed for: lion,
Aluminum, Ammonia, Arsenic, Cadmium, Calcium, Copper, Lead, Magnesium, Mercury,
Molybdenum, Nickel, Nitrate-Nitrite, Zinc, % Total Solids, pH, Phosphorus, Potassium, TKN,
Selenium, and Sodium. From this information, the Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) will be
calculated. This sample of the Town of Madison WTP Residuals will be collected and composited
prior to being sent to a qualified laboratory that is familiar with routine environmental sample
preparation and standards.
The Town of Madison will remove residual solids from one of either of the two alum lagoons.
While one of the lagoons is being dewatered and residual solids removed, the other lagoon will
receive the flow. After one lagoon is emptied, flow will be diverted to the recently cleaned lagoon.
The other lagoon will be allowed to settle and effluent discharged under NPDES Permit No.
NC0085626. When the solids have thickened enough, another land application event will be

scheduled. Additional solids samples will be collected when solids content changes in the removed
residual solids.
Once a permit cycle a composite residuals solid sample will be analyzed for TCLP. TCLP
parameters are listed below:
Arsenic Barium Benzene Vinyl Chloride
Cadmium Carbon tetrachloride Chlordane Silver
Chlorobenzene Chloroform Chromium Toxaphene
o-Cresol m-Cresol p-Cresol Trichloroethylene
Cresol 2,4-D 1,4-Dichlorobenzene
1,2-Dichloroethane 1,1-Dichloroethylene 2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Endrin Hexachlorobenzene Heptachlor(and its hydroxide)
Hexachloroethane Lead Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene
Lindane Mercury Methoxychlor
Methyl ethyl ketone Nitrobenzene Pentachlorophenol
Pyridine Selenium Tetrachloroethylene
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 2,4,5-TP(Silvex)
In addition,the residual analyses will be monitored for ignitability, corrosivity,and reactivity.

Residual Analytical Reports

Report Number:
R08212-8004 A&L EASTERN LABORATORIES, INC.
Account Number: 7621 White pine Road • Richmond,Virginia 23237 , a �`�
46368 g it- .'
[phone] • Fax No. [phone]
REPORT PRINTED 9/10/2008
TO: BRANCH RESIDUALS & SOILS LLC FOR: MADISON ALUM COPY: BOB BRANCH
311B S WESTGATE DR
GREENSBORO, NC 27407 NC CERT#257
ATTN: BOB BRANCH
REPORT OF ANALYSIS DATE SAMPLED: 7/29/2008 1035
LAB NUMBER: 44303 DATE RECEIVED: 7/30/2008 1000
SAMPLE ID: MADISON ALUM DATE REPORTED: 8/5/2008 PAGE: 1
RESULT RESULT DETECTION LIMIT ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
PARAMETER
(%,) (mg/kg) (mg/kg") ANALYST DATE TIME METHOD
Solids, Total (As is) 41.85 418500 100 JM 07/30/08 16:00 SM 2540G
Nitrogen, Total Kjeldahl 0.25 2500 10 MW 07/31/08 16:00 SM 4500 (NorgB+NH3C)
Phosphorus 0.09 900 100 KM 07/31/08 16:00 SW 846-3051/6010B
Potassium 0.23 2300 100 KM 07/31/08 16:00 SW 846-3051/6010B
Calcium 0.15 1500 100 KM 07/31/08 16:00 SW 846-3051/6010B
Magnesium 0.31 3100 100 KM 07/31/08 16:00 SW 846-3051/6010B
Sodium 0.06 600 100 KM 07/31/08 16:00 SW 846-3051/6010B
Aluminum 57400 10 KM 07/31/08 16:00 SW 846-3051/6010B
Copper 35 1 KM 07/31/08 15:00 SW 846-3051/6010B
Zinc 72 1 KM 07/31/08 16:00 SW 846-3051/6010B
Nitrogen, Ammonia (as N) 0.02 200 10 MW 07/31/08 14:00 SM 4500(NH3B+NH3C)
Nitrogen, Organic (N) 0.23 2300 100 DCH CALCULATION
Nitrogen, NO3+NO2 < 1 1 KS 07/31/08 15:00 SM 4500-NO3F
Cadmium < 1 1 KM 07/31/08 16:00 SW 846-3051/6010B
Nickel 20 5 KM 07/31/08 16:00 SW 846-3051/6010B
Lead 16 5 KM 07/31/08 16:00 SW 846-3051/6010B
Arsenic 5.6 1.0 KM 07/31/08 15:00 SW 846-6010B
Mercury < 0.4 0.4 KM 07/31/08 15:00 SW 846-7471A
TCLP RESULTS TO FOLLOW!!!
All values are on a dry weight basis except as noted. *Detection Limit on all N series is on a wet basis.
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients,and may not be reproduced in whole or in part,nor may any reference be made
to the work,the results,or the company in any advertising,news release,or other public announcements without obtaining our prior written authorization. --
II
PAUL C.H.CHU

Report Number:
R08212-8004 A&L EASTERN LABORATORIES, INC. ,, , iiiii
Account Number: 7621 Whitepine Road • Richmond, Virginia 23237 ; ry
46368 [phone] • Fax No. [phone] ,
REPORT PRINTED 9/10/2008
TO: BRANCH RESIDUALS & SOILS LLC FOR: MADISON ALUM COPY: BOB BRANCH
311B S WESTGATE DR
GREENSBORO, NC 27407 NC CERT#257
ATTN: BOB BRANCH
REPORT OF ANALYSIS DATE SAMPLED: 7/29/2008 1035
LAB NUMBER: 44303 DATE RECEIVED: 7/30/2008 1000
SAMPLE ID: MADISON ALUM DATE REPORTED: 8/5/2008 PAGE: 2
RESULT RESULT DETECTION ANALYSIS ANALYSIS
PARAMETFR �, ANALYST METHOD
r<,( ) (mg/kg) LIMIT(mg/kg) DATE TIME
Selenium < 1.0 1.0 KM 07/31/08 15:00 SW 846-6010B
pH (Std. Unit, As is) 6.58 0.01 RD 07/31/08 12:30 SW 846-9045C
Molybdenum < 5 5 KM 07/31/08 16:00 SW 846-3051/6010B
Sulfate SO4 (Turbimetric) 19 1 RD 07/31/08 15:00 SM 4500 SO4E
TCLP RESULTS TO FOLLOW!!!
All values are on a dry weight basis except as noted.*Detection Limit on all N series is on a wet basis.
Our reports and letters are for the exclusive and confidential use of our clients,and may not be reproduced in whole or In part,nor may any reference be made
to the work,the results,or the company in any advertising,news release,or other public announcements without obtaining our prior written authorization. "
PAUL C.H.CHU

Primary Laboratories, Inc.
Results
8-Aug-08
Date Sampled: 29-Jul-08
Work Order No: 0808006-01
Units of Measure: mg/L
Client ID: AUL#:44303
Test Final Reporting Regulatory Method Date Tech.
Description Result Limit Level Numbers* Analyzed Initials
TCLP Herbicides
2,4-0 <0.01 0.01 10.0 SW-846 1311/8151A 8-Aug-08 HV
2,4,5-TP(Silvex) <0.002 0.002 1.0 SW-846 1311/8151A 8-Aug-08 HV
TCLP Volatiles
Benzene <0.005 0.005 0.5 SW-846 1311/8260B 5-Aug-08 PB
2-Butanone(MEK) <0.100 0.100 200.0 SW-846 1 31 1/8260B 5-Aug-08 PB
Carbon tetrachloride <0.005 0.005 0.5 SW-846 1311/8260B 5-Aug-08 PB
Chlorobenzene <0.005 0.005 100.0 SW-846 1311/8260B 5-Aug-08 PB
Chloroform <0.005 0.005 6 SW-846 1311/8260B 5-Aug-08 PB
1,2-Dichloroethane <0.005 0.005 0.5 SW-846 1311/8260B 5-Aug-08 PB
1,1-Dichloroethene <0.005 0.005 0.7 SW-846 1311/8260B 5-Aug-08 PB
Tetrachloroethene <0.005 0.005 0.7 SW-846 1311/8260B 5-Aug-08 PB
Trichloroethene <0.005 0.005 0.5 SW-846 1311/8260B 5-Aug-08 PB
Vinyl Chloride <0.010 0.010 0.2 SW-846 1311/8260B 5-Aug-08 PB
TCLP Semivolatiles
o-Cresol <0.010 0.010 200.0 SW-846 1311/8270C 6-Aug-08 HV
m-Cresol <0.010 0.010 200.0 SW-846 1311/8270C 6-Aug-08 HV
p-Cresol <0.010 0.010 200.0 SW-846 1311/8270C 6-Aug-08 HV
Cresol(Total) <0.030 0.030 200.0 SW-846 1311/8270C 6-Aug-08 HV
1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.010 0.010 7.5 SW-846 1311/8270C 6-Aug-08 HV
2,4-Dinitrotoluene <0.050 0.050 0.1 SW-846 1311/8270C 6-Aug-08 HV
Hexachlorobenzene <0.010 0.010 0.13 SW-846 1311/8270C 6-Aug-08 HV
Hexachlorobutadiene <0.010 0.010 0.5 SW-846 1311/8270C 6-Aug-08 HV
Hexachloroethane <0.010 0.010 3.0 SW-846 1311/8270C 6-Aug-08 HV
Nitrobenzene <0.010 0.010 2.0 SW-846 1311/8270C 6-Aug-08 HV
Pentachlorophenol <0.050 0.050 100.0 SW-846 1311/8270C 6-Aug-08 HV
Pyridine <0.020 0.020 5.0 SW-846 1311/8270C 6-Aug-08 HV
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol <0.010 0.010 400.0 SW-846 1311/8270C 6-Aug-08 HV
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol <0.010 0.010 2.0 SW-846 1311/8270C 6-Aug-08 HV
NC Certificate#504 Page 2 of 3

Primary Laboratories, Inc.
7423 Lee Davis Road,Mechanicsville,VA 23111 .Telephone[phone].Fax[phone]
-
ANALYTICAL LABORATORY REPORT
8-Aug-08 R08212-8004
A&L Eastern Laboratories, Inc. BRANCH RESIDUALS&SOILS LLC
Attn: Kathy Scott 311B S WESTGATE DR
7621 Whitepine Road GREENSBORO NC 27407 46368
Richmond,Virginia 23237
Date Received: 1-Aug-08
Date Sampled: 29-Jul-08
Work Order No: 0808006-01
Units of Measure: mg/L
Client ID: A&L#:44303 MADISON ALUM
Test Final Reporting Regulatory Method Date Tech.
Description Result Limit Level Numbers* Analyzed Initials
TCLP Metals
Arsenic <0.050 0.050 5.0 SW-846 1311/6010B 6-Aug-08 HV
Barium 0.326 0.020 100.0 SW-8461311/6010B 6-Aug-08 HV
Cadmium <0.010 0.010 1.0 SW-846 1311/6010B 6-Aug-08 HV
Chromium <0.020 0.020 5.0 SW-846 1311/6010B 6-Aug-08 HV
Lead <0.050 0.050 5.0 SW-8461311/6010B 6-Aug-08 HV
Mercury <0.002 0.002 0.2 SW-846 1311/7471 7-Aug-08 HV
Selenium <0.050 0.050 1.0 SW-846 1311/6010B 6-Aug-08 HV
Silver <0.020 0.020 5.0 SW-846 1311/6010B 6-Aug-08 HV
TCLP Chlorinated
Pesticides
Methoxychlor <0.0001 0.0001 10.0 SW-84.61311/8082A 8-Aug-08 HV
Lindane <0.0001 0.0001 0.4 SW-846 1311/8082A 8-Aug-08 HV
Heptachlor <0.0001 0.0001 0.008 SW-846 1311/8082A 8-Aug-08 HV
Heptachlor epoxide <0.0001 0.0001 0.008 SW-846 1 31 1/8082A 8-Aug-08 HV
Endrin <0.0001 0.0001 0.02 SW-846 1311/8082A 8-Aug-08 HV
Chlordane <0.0005 0.0005 0.03 SW-846 1311/8082A 8-Aug-08 HV
Toxaphene <0.002 0.002 0.5 SW-846 1311/8082A 8-Aug-08 HV
NC Certificate#504 Page 1 of 3

Primary Laboratories, Inc.
Results
8-Aug-08
Date Sampled: 29-Jul-08
Work Order No: 0808006-01
Client ID: A&L#:44303
Test Final Reporting Units of Method Date Tech.
Description Result Limit Measure Numbers* Analyzed Initials
Reactivity
Cyanide <1 1 mg/Kg SW 846 6-Aug-08 MS
Sufide <0.05 0.05 mg/Kg Chap. 7.3 8-Aug-08 NA
Corrosivity Non-corrosive - - SW 846 7-Aug-08 MS
Chap. 7.2
Flash Point >140 140 Degree F 1010 5-Aug-08 MS
*All methods are Standard Methods 18th Edition unless otherwise noted.
Signature: ' Date:8-8-08
Parry L.Bragg
Laboratory Manager
These analytical results are based upon materials provided by the client and are intended for the exclusive use of the client These
analytical results represent the best judgement of Primary Laboratories.Inc.Primary Laboratories,Inc.assumes no responsibility,
express or implied,as to the Interpretation of the analytical results contained in this report This report is not to be reproduced
except with the written approval of Primary Laboratories,Inc.
NC Certificate#504 Page 3 of 3

Microbac Laboratories, Inc.
SOUTHERN TESTING&RESEARCH DIVISION
Microbac 3809 AIRPORT DRIVE,NW
WILSON,NC 27896-8649
[phone] [phone](fax)
www.southerntesting.com
REPORT of ANALYSIS SAMPLE No.: T5510-001 / AB73709
Date Reported: Thursday, August 07, 2008
ROBERT BRANCH
BRANCH RESIDUALS & SOILS
311 B SOUTH WESTGATE DR Phone/Fax: [phone]
GREENSBORO NC 274C7 P. O.:
Client Sample Marks: TOWN OF MADISON ALUM RESIDUALS 1
Sample Collection Date: 7/29/2008 9:10:00 AM Matrix: SOIL
Lab Submittal Date: 7/29/2008 1:05:00 PM Classification: E
CAT No. ANALYSES METHOD ANALYZED by PQL RESULT UNIT
EB-007-01-G Fecal Co?iiorm(MPN) sw SM 9221E 7/29/2008 DMK 1 <1 MPN/g
EW-040-12-G SOLIDS: TOTAL(%) SM 2540B 7/29/2008 DMK 0.04 41.8 %
Sample Comments:
:Leviewed and Approved by:
la inn ant
Manager, Analytical Sciences Department
Page 1 of 7 Admin 8/7/2008 4:23:57 PM
Wilson Division - NC001 20 Certification: Drinking Water#37708 Wastewater#21
(-G) Greensboro Divisio:: - NC001754 Certification: Drinking Water#37795 Wastewater#637
For any feedback concerning our services,please contact Rob Dermer,Managing Director,
at rdermercrnicrobac.com,or Trevor Boyce,President,at [e-mail]
Chemical and Microbiological Analysis: Environmental •Agrochemical• Foods• Pharmaceuticals

Microbac Laboratories, Inc.
SOUTHERN TESTING&RESEARCH DIVISION
Microbac 3809 AIRPORT DRIVE,NW
WILSON,NC 27896-8649
[phone] [phone](fax)
www.southerntesting.com
REPORT of ANALYSIS SAMPLE No.: T5510-002 / AB73710
Date Reported: Thursday, August 07, 2008
ROBERT BRANCH
BRANCH RESIDUALS &SOILS
311 B SOUTH WESTGATE DR Phone/Fax: [phone]
GREENSBORO NC 27407 P. O.:
Client Sample Marks: TOWN OF MADISON ALUM RESIDUALS 2
Sample Collection Dale: 7/29/2008 9:17:00 AM Matrix: SOIL
Lab Submittal Date: 7/29/2008 1:05:00 PM Classification: E
CAT No. ANALYSES METHOD ANALYZED by PQL RESULT UNIT
EB-007-01-G Fecal Coiiiorm (MPN)sw SM 9221E 7/29/2008 DMK 1 <1 MPN/g
EW-040-12-G SOLIDS:TOTAL(%) SM 2540B 7/29/2008 DMK 0.04 45.5 %
Sample Comments:
Re ' wed ar�d A proved by:
Hinna
Manager,Analytical Sciences Department
Page 2 of 7 Admin 8/7/2008 4:23:57 PM
Wilson Division- NC00120 Certification: Drinking Water#37708 Wastewater#21
(-G)Greensboro Division - NC001754 Certification: Drinking Water#37795 Wastewater#637
For any feedback concerning our services,please contact Rob Demmer,Managing Director,
at [e-mail],or Trevor Boyce,President,at [e-mail]
Chemical and Microbiological Analysis: Environmental• Agrochemical • Foods• Pharmaceuticals

Microbac Laboratories, Inc.
SOUTHERN TESTING&RESEARCH DIVISION
Microbac 3809 AIRPORT DRIVE,NW
WILSON,NC 27896-8649
[phone] [phone](fax)
www.southerntesting.com
SAMPLE No.: T5510-003 / AB73711
REPORT of ANALYSIS Date Reported: Thursday,August 07, 2008
ROBERT BRANCH
BRANCH RESIDUALS & SOILS
311 B SOUTH WESTGATE DR Phone/Fax: [phone]
GREENSBORO NC 27407 P. O.:
Client Sample Marks: TOWN OF MADISON ALUM RESIDUALS 3
Sample Collection Date: 7/29/2008 9:24:00 AM Matrix: SOIL
Lab Submittal Date: 7/29/2008 1:05:00 PM Classification: E
CAT No. ANALYSES METHOD ANALYZED by PQL RESULT UNIT
EB-007-01-G Fecal Coliform(MPN)sw SM 9221E 7/29/2008 DMK 1 <1 MPN/g
EW 040-12-G SOLIDS:TOTAL(%) SM 2540E 7/29/2008 DMK 0.04 46.5 %
Sample Comments:
r�ed and Approved by:
•- _ �inn�rrt'�
Manager,Analytical Sciences Department
Page 3 of 7 Admin 8/7/2008 4:23:57 PM
Wilson Division - NC00120 Certification: Drinking Water#37708 Wastewater#21
(-G) Greensboro Division - NC001754 Certification: Drinking Water#37795 Wastewater#637
For any feedback concerning our services,please contact Rob Demmer,Managing Director,
at [e-mail],or Trevor Boyce,President,at president©microbac.com
Chemical and Microbiological Analysis: Environmental • Agrochemical • Foods• Pharmaceuticals

Microbac Laboratories, Inc.
SOUTHERN TESTING&RESEARCH DIVISION
Microbac 3809 AIRPORT DRIVE,NW
WILSON,NC 27896-8649
[phone] [phone](fax)
www.southerntesting.com
REPORT of ANALYSIS SAMPLE No.: T5510-004 / AB73712
Date Reported: Thursday, August 07,2008
ROBERT BRANCH
BRANCH RESIDUALS & SOILS
311 B SOUTH WESTGATE DR Phone/Fax: [phone]
GREENSBORO NC 27407 P. O.:
Client Sample Marks: TOWN OF MADISON ALUM RESIDUALS 4
Sample Collection Date: 7/29/2008 9:35:00 AM Matrix: SOIL
Lab Submittal Date: 7/29/2008 1:05:00 PM Classification: E
CAT No. ANALYSES METHOD ANALYZED by PQL RESULT UNIT
EB-007-01-G Fecal Cofform(MPN)sw SM 9221E 7/29/2008 DMK 1 <1 MPN/g
EW-040-12-G SOLIDS: TOTAL(%) SM 2540B 7/29/2008 DMK 0.04 39.5 %
Sample Comments:
Re ' eld and roved by:
( t �
tnnant
Manager,Analytical Sciences Department
Page 4 of 7 Admin 8/7/2008 4:23:57 PM
Wilson Division- NC00120 Certification: Drinking Water#37708 Wastewater#21
(-G)Greensboro Division - NC001754 Certification: Drinking Water#37795 Wastewater#637
For any feedback concerning our services,please contact Rob Dermer,Managing Director,
at [e-mail],or Trevor Boyce,President,at president©microbac.com
Chemical and Microbiological Analysis: Environmental • Agrochemical• Foods• Pharmaceuticals

Microbac Laboratories, Inc.
SOUTHERN TESTING& RESEARCH DIVISION
Microbac 3809 AIRPORT DRIVE,NW
WILSON,NC 27896-8649
[phone] (252)237-934/(fax)
www.southerntesting.com
SAMPLE No.: T5510-005 / AB73713
REPORT of ANALYSIS Date Reported: Thursday,August 07, 2008
ROBERT BRANCH
BRANCH RESIDUALS &SOILS
311 B SOUTH WESTGATE DR Phone/Fax: [phone]
GREENSBORO NC 27407 P. O.:
Client Sample Marks: TOWN OF MADISON ALUM RESIDUALS 5
Sample Collection Date: 7/29/2008 10:12:00 AM Matrix: SOIL
Lab Submittal Date: 7/29/2008 1:05:00 PM Classification: E
CAT No. ANALYSES METHOD ANALYZED by PQL RESULT UNIT
EB-007-01-G Fecal Coliform(MPN)sw SM 9221E 7/29/2008 DMK 1 <1 MPN/g
EW 040-12-G SOLIDS:TOTAL(%) SM 2540B 7/29/2008 DMK 0.04 35.2 %
Sample Comments:
wed and Approved by:
klrea Hinn
Hnnan I '
Manager, Analytical Sciences Department
Page 5 of 7 Admin 8R/2008 4:23:57 PM
Wilson Division - NC00120 Certification: Drinking Water#37708 Wastewater#21
(-G)Greensboro Division- NC001754 Certification: Drinking Water#37795 Wastewater#637
For any feedback concerning our services,please contact Rob Dermer,Managing Director,
at [e-mail],or Trevor Boyce,President,at [e-mail]
Chemical and Microbiological Analysis: Environmental • Agrochemical • Foods• Pharmaceuticals

Microbac Laboratories, Inc.
SOUTHERN TESTING& RESEARCH DIVISION
Microbac 3809 AIRPORT DRIVE,NW
WILSON, NC 2 78 96-864 9
(252)2.37-4175 [phone] (fax)
www.south erntes ting.corn
REPORT of ANALYSIS SAMPLE No.: T5510-006 / A673714
Date Reported: Thursday, August 07, 2008
ROBERT BRANCH
BRANCH RESIDUALS & SOILS
311 B SOUTH WESTGATE DR Phone/Fax: [phone]
GREENSBORO NC 27407 P. O.:
Client Sample Marks: TOWN OF MADISON ALUM RESIDUALS 6
Sample Collection Date: 7/29/2008 10:16:00 AM Matrix: SOIL
Lab Submittal Date: 7/29/2008 1:05:00 PM Classification: E
CAT No. ANALYSES METHOD ANALYZED by PQL RESULT UNIT
EB-007-01-G Fecal Coliform(MPN)sw SM 9221E 7/29/2008 DMK 1 <1 MPN/g
EW-040-12-G SOLIDS:TOTAL(%) SM 2540B 7/29/2008 DMK 0.04 43.7 %
Sample Comments:
' 4-, �and Approved by:
- - Hinnant
Manager,Analytical Sciences Department
Page 6 of 7 Admin 8/7/2008 4:23:57 PM
Wilson Division - NC00120 Certification: Drinking Water#37708 Wastewater#21
(-G) Greensboro Division -NC001754 Certification: Drinking Water#37795 Wastewater#637
For any feedback concerning our services,please contact Rob Dermer,Managing Director,
at [e-mail],or Trevor Boyce,President,at [e-mail]
Chemical and Microbiological Analysis: Environmental • Agrochemical • Foods• Pharmaceuticals

Microbac Laboratories, Inc.
SOUTHERN TESTING&RESEARCH DIVISION
Microbac 3809 AIRPORT DRIVE,NW
WI/SON,NC 2 78 96-864 9
[phone] [phone](fax)
www.southerntesting.com
SAMPLE No.: T5510-007 / AB73715
REPORT of ANALYSIS Date Reported: Thursday,August 07, 2008
ROBERT BRANCH
BRANCH RESIDUALS & SOILS
311 B SOUTH WESTGATE DR Phone/Fax: [phone]
GREENSBORO NC 27407 P. O.:
Client Sample Marks: TOWN OF MADISON ALUM RESIDUALS 7
Sample Collection Date: 7/29/2008 10:26:00 AM Matrix: SOIL
Lab Submittal Date: 7/29/2008 1:05:00 PM Classification: E
CAT No. ANALYSES METHOD ANALYZED by PQL RESULT UNIT
EB-007-01-G Fecal Coliform (MPN)sw SM 9221E 7/29/2008 DMK 1 <1 MPN/g
EW 040-12-G SOLIDS:TOTAL(%) SM 2540B 7/29/2008 DMK 0.04 39.6 %
Sample Comments:
r� danced Approved by:
Hi nnan�"'
Manager,Analytical Sciences Department
Page 7 of 7 Admin 8/7/2008 4:23:57 PM
Wilson Division- NC00120 Certification: Drinking Water#37708 Wastewater#21
(-G)Greensboro Division -NC001754 Certification: Drinking Water#37795 Wastewater#637
For any feedback concerning our services,please contact Rob Dermer,Managing Director,
at [e-mail],or Trevor Boyce,President,at [e-mail]
Chemical and Microbiological Analysis: Environmental • Agrochemical • Foods• Pharmaceuticals

.... — — —
• Microbac Laboratories Inc. Page___7/_____of___Z___
CHAINOF CUSTODY rdill 'AIPIIPAIIIFIFIFIA1.41. 11.41=1,IFIVAII=0,11,11M1,11 ,11, IPAIIMIIIIAMINP,M1
\I kr()11):1(- Southern Testing & Research Division
8-8 Wendy Court,Greensboro, NC 27409 A R eques • Lab Use Only •
an d nal yses t
Phone:[phone]•Fax: [phone] 1Rush Approval By: loateme:/
Website:www.southerntestina.com :Dept: -7,/,',%5A..) ,- 0
• /Original i . ;;...,, f\,..,, I ,./..,,,, 4.., i, /..,:,.., , i ii, .e., ) Contact Person:-',
I
,
- •
' -----' ,
IN, i L)/ ,,-. ,,- A. !Sample#
0
/
•Rec'd on Ice% Acct.#
Temp: _._ Res.Cl. Transport:
pH:
Address: — - Phone# --
/ , .r-:-' -‘ -; i'..4',-- i .-i, f J. ( '- ,,'-l'• /k 11;1 Yes El No ' /
/ l
Invoice Address: ., . Fax# - - ISAMPLING CHARGES:
_.--/-1.,,s, 2 .?. ,,7 ;Time MiLtaais Other
Sampled By: .. i-./.., Projecj ID: Analyses Requested
......
-- *
Reested Turnaround Time : :•,A : , 1'1'!,..k i'..t ,,( ......
U.- Normal(2 weeks) CI Rush(3-5 days)•
PO# STRL QUOTE#
'ADDITIONAL CHARGES WILL APPLY
CALL FOR APPROVAL Client Requested Due Date:
kem Start End Comp Grab Sample ' (5) ck Ilit• 41.4" ...,.... 'i'-
# Date/Time Date/Time ** ** Type** Description/Sample Marks
, ...i.4..L.L----..........
• , ,
' .
4• "71-77,"'""'---------- . i i
2 .
, ..
,
i f , .
-
,. 1.. .
..
RELINQUISHED BY DATE/TIME ' RECEIVED BY . DATE/TIME NOTES:
. -.,.
2
3
Field Res.CL.: Field Conductivity: Field Temp: Field pH: Field D.O.:
IS DATA TO BE USED FOR REGULATORY COMPLIANCE PURPOSES? D•-•YES Li NO IF YES,WHICH REGULATORY AGENCY: ' - ,
'- . "
**See Reverse for Codes SAM001.01 (1/06)
FIELD COPY

I
I
I
SECTION III
MANAGEMENT PLAN
I
I

MANAGEMENT PLAN
The Town of Madison produces alum residual solids from its water treatment plant (WTP)as a bi-
product of the generation of potable water. These residual solids are water plant residuals and do
not contain any domestic contributions and not subject to the 40 CFR Part 503 regulations. The
current permit will be renewed and modified to increase the dry tons amounts from 100 to 1,600
dry tons annually. The residual solids will be applied as is with no mixing of other materials
needed. The residual solids will remain in the current lagoon until land application activities are
scheduled to begin. The residuals will be transported directly from the WTP to the application site,
where they will be land applied,used as landfill cover,or used as fill dirt.
The Town of Madison or its assigned representative will identify local landowners as receiver sites.
Application made to all sites will be based on the ability of the crop and the land to properly
assimilate the residual solids. Hydraulic loading rate of the application rate, percent solids of the
residuals applied, and the type and thickness of the vegetative cover will be the determining factors.
Nitrogen needs of the crop to be grown on the receiver sites will be considered for these rates as
well; however,this will be of a secondary nature due to the low nutrient content of these residuals.

Overview of Process and Residual Solids Handling

Overview of Process and Residual Solids Handling
The Town of Madison Water Treatment Plant (WTP) (PWSID: 02-79-030) is located at 403
Lindsey Bridge Road in Rockingham County. The WTP is a 1.5 million gallon per day (MGD)
plant that serves the Town of Madison's drinking water needs.
The WTP draws its raw water from the Dan River. This water is pumped to the WTP, where it is
treated with alum, flocculated, clarified, settled and filtered. Solids from these processes and
backwash solids are sent to one of two lagoons. Currently solids are directed to the triangular
lagoon. After decanting and thickening, the solids from the triangular lagoon are transferred tot he
rectangular lagoon.
When the solids get sufficiently high in the second lagoon that is used for storage, a land
application event will be planned. These solids will probably be land applied every 2 to 4 years.
Prior to each land application event, appropriate residual solids samples will be collected and sent
to a qualified lab.

Distribution Methods for Reuse

Distribution Methods for Reuse
The product will be given away to local landowners who desire the material as a soil amendment,
used as fill dirt or used as landfill cover. The amount of material produced annually is estimated
to be 100 dry tons but based on the amount stored at the facility, 1600 dry tons are estimated to
be removed from the lagoon.
The Town of Madison WTP Residuals will be distributed to anyone interested in using this
material in the proper manner. Individuals or other entities can contact the Town of Madison for
use of these residuals as a soil amendment or fill dirt. The Town of Madison has previously been
listed as being able to utilize this material as landfill cover and for uses with North Carolina
Department of Transportation road projects.
All uses of the Town of Madison WTP Residuals will be required to meet buffer and site
restrictions as identified on the label and product information sheet.

Transportation and Logistics

Transportation and Logistics
The Town of Madison WTP Residuals will be removed from the sludge lagoons and transported to
appropriate receiver sites. Trucks will travel on major traffic routes to the application sites. If the
sites are close enough to the lagoons, these residual may be loaded directly on to a pull behind
applicator and transported over highways to the application sites.
Individuals, agencies, or companies wishing to receive the Town of Madison WTP Residuals will
be issued a product information sheet, the most recent copy of the analytical information, and
Product Receipt Form. The product information sheet will specify the buffer requirements of the
Town of Madison WTP Residuals as well as application restrictions. The Product Receipt Form
will document:
• Amount of Town of Madison WTP Residuals received,
• The name,address and telephone number of the person who prepared the residuals,
• The name, address and telephone number of the person distributing/land applying the
residuals,
• A description of the source or process by which the residuals are generated,
• A summary of the results from the most recent residuals sampling event,
• A summary of the volume of residuals distributed/land applied per acre,
• A summary of the nutrients land applied per acre,and
• A list of recommendations to the recipient of the residual regarding field use, soil testing,
pH adjustment,and other relevant agronomic information.
Both the Product Label and the Product Receipt Form will be required to ensure receipt of this
information and for the removal volume. Copies of this information will be retained by the Town
of Madison and will be available for review upon request
Both the land applier(if different from the site receiver)and the site receiver will be instructed as to
the proper use of this material as listed below:

• Applications should be made in accordance with approved application standards.
• Application shall not be made to land that is flooded,frozen,or snow covered.
• Application and storage must be performed to prevent runoff from the application or
storage site to any surface water.
• Buffer or "no application" zones as described in the approved permit and Product
Information Sheet.
• Applications must not be applied so thick as to cover existing vegetation.

Monitoring and Recordkeeping

Monitoring and Recordkeeping
The Town of Madison facility requests that the WTP Residuals be monitored quarterly for residuals
analysis. A set of seven (7) fecal analyses will be performed prior to each distribution event. A
TCLP analysis will be performed once per permit cycle. The Town of Madison WTP Residuals
samples will be collected and delivered to a laboratory qualified to analyze residual solids and that
is familiar with routine environmental sample preparation and standards.
Records pertinent to the successful management of the land applications program will be
maintained for the benefit of the farm operator, DWQ, land applicator, and permittee. These
records will contain at a minimum:
• Source of the residuals.
• Date of the residual application,
• Information regarding the location of the residual application ( i.e. field owner name,
address,and telephone number, approximate field location, and field number)
• Method of application,
• Weather conditions,
• Soil conditions,
• Type of crop or crops to be grown on the field,
• Volume or weight of residuals applied to the field,
• Annual totals of dry tons per acre of residuals, annual pounds of plant available nitrogen,
and annual pounds of phosphorus applied to the field.

Each year an annual summary of the activities of the program will be prepared and delivered to the
appropriate agencies and participants on or before the 1st of March. The annual summary will
include:
1. A) Source of the Town of Madison WTP Residuals
B) Volume/Weight of the Town of Madison WTP Residuals
C) Name of the Town of Madison WTP Residuals receiver
D) Intended use(s)of the Town of Madison WTP Residuals
E) Volume/Weight of other Amendments or Bulking Agents
H) Annual totals of dry tons/acre of the Town of Madison WTP Residuals,pounds
of plant available nitrogen(PAN),phosphorus, and lime applied distributed.
2. Quarterly an event nutrient and metal analyses of: Aluminum, Ammonia, Arsenic,
Cadmium, Calcium, Copper, Lead, Magnesium, Mercury, Molybdenum, Nickel,
Nitrate-Nitrite,Zinc,%Total Solids,pH,Phosphorus,Potassium,TKN, Selenium, and
Sodium will be collected and analyzed by a qualified laboratory. From this
information, the Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN) will be calculated. If land
application occurs at a frequency of less than annually,nutrient and metal analyses will
be required for each distribution event.
3. Once a permit cycle a Toxicity Characteristics Leaching Procedure (TCLP) analysis
with ignitability, reactivity, and corrosivity of the Town of Madison WTP Residuals
will be collected and analyzed by a qualified laboratory.
I
I
I

uogaanoD a;agasaZ

Leachate Collection
No provision is made for leachate collection since the residuals are not designed to undergo any
mixing with other productions other than itself. These residuals will remain in-place and not be
removed until the time of application.

SECTION IV
PRODUCT INFORMATION SHEET

The Town of Madison WTP Residuals Label
Produced By Preparer
Town of Madison Mike Morrison [phone]
Water Treatment Plant 120 North Market Street
Madison,North Carolina 27025 Madison,North Carolina 27025
For information on this product contact the Town of Madison at(336)427-0221
The Town of Madison WTP Residuals are the settled fraction of the preparation of drinking
water for the Town of Madison. The generated residuals product contain the filtered or settled
sediments of the raw water collected from the Dan River and the chemical coagulation and
treatment processes that covert raw water to drinking water. The Town of Madison WTP
Residuals are an exceptional quality residual solid that is permitted for bulk distribution.
Provisions for Application
Application of the Town of Madison WTP Residuals are prohibited except in accordance with the
provisions specified in the Application Information Sheet. Application must conform to standards
identified in Permit WQ0019753 and include but are not limited to:
Maximum slope for the land application of these residuals is 10 %for surface applications and
18%for subsurface applications
Distance
Buffer Items (feet)
Public or private water supply source,waters classified as SA or SB,and any Class I or Class II impounded
reservoir used as a source of drinking water for both surface and subsurface methods 100
Streams classified as WS or B,any other stream,canal,marsh or coastal waters,and any other lake or impoundment
for surface application 100
Streams classified as WS or B,any other stream,canal,marsh or coastal waters,and any other lake or impoundment
for subsurface application 50
Property lines(both surface and subsurface applications) 50
Public righ of ways(both surface and subsurface applications) 50
Upslope interceptor drains and surface water diversions(both surface and subsurface applications) 10
Downslope interceptor drains,surface water diversion,groundwater drainage systems, and surface waterdrainage
ditches(both surface and subsurface applications) 25

Application Information Sheet
1. The Town of Madison WTP Residuals are designed for use as a soil conditioner. Applications of
Town of Madison WTP Residuals should be made in accordance with approved application standards
and WQ0019753 permit conditions.
2. The Town of Madison WTP Residuals shall not be applied to flooded, frozen, or snow covered
areas.
3. Application and storage of the Town of Madison WTP Residuals must be conducted in such a way as
to prevent runoff from the application or storage site to any surface water.
4. Applications of the Town of Madison WTP Residuals must not be applied so thick as to cover
existing vegetation. Application that is made to sites with less than 50 percent ground cover should be
incorporated
5. Applications of the Town of Madison WTP Residuals shall be applied uniformly at a rate equal to or
less than the hydraulic rate for the site and the soils, the ability to smother the currently growing crop, or the
agronomic rate of the crop as specified by the permit and most recent residuals analysis; whichever is most
limiting.
6. An acceptable soil pH(greater than 6.0) for proper crop growth and to prevent aluminum/iron toxicity of the
growing crops shall be maintained on the receiver site. The soil pH should be verified annually with a soil
sample with recommendations. These recommendations should be followed as they relate to optimal crop
growth, monitoring and adjustment of the exchangeable sodium percentage, potential for calcium and
magnesium deficiency, as well as other relevant agronomic information. Additional fertilizer, lime, or other
nutrients may need to be added as directed by the soil sample results.
7. Applications and loading rates of the Town of Madison WTP Residuals shall be applied at rates that
comply with realistic yield expectations based on the soil series and crops found at:
http://nutrients.soil.ncsu.edu/yields/
Town of Madison WTP Residuals
Approximately Contains:
41.85 %Solids
2.04 lbs.Plant Available Nitrogen/Dry Ton
1.00 lbs.Phosphorus/Dry Ton
2.60 lbs.Potassium/Dry Ton
See the Town of Madison WTP for a copy of the most recent residuals analysis and loading
rates.
The Town of Madison WTP will provide you a copy of the nutrients that were actually
applied per acre to individual fields. An example of this type of form is attached.

SECTION V
SPILL CONTROL PLAN

SPILL CONTROL PLAN
TOWN OF MADISON WTP RESIDUALS
SANFORD,NORTH CAROLINA
In the case of a spill,the following actions shall be taken immediately:
1. Halt the source of the spill: Damaged truck or trailer tank unit.
2. Contain spill: Use straw bales to form a barrier. Straw hay bales can be obtained from
several sources for this purpose. Soil near the site can also be used to form a barrier for
containment.
3. Clean up: Use residual solids application equipment to recover as much of the material
as possible. After the application equipment has recovered as much material as possible,
it will be land applied as per operation plan.
4. Final Clean up: Any unrecoverable material will be scraped and swept from the road
surface and incorporated into an adjacent tillable area.
5. Notification: As soon as possible after a spill occurs notify:
A. Town of Madison Water Treatment Plant—ORC [phone]
B. Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office at(336)77l' 0O9- 776,-9$00
C. The Rockingham County Sheriffs Department
D. Fire Department if assistance is required for washdown
6. Management of clean up efforts: The WTP ORC or applicator shall take immediate
charge of the clean up activities. Additional labor will be requested from the treatment
plant and other departments as needed.
7. Reporting: Within 5 days of notifications,a written report will be prepared detailing the
cause of the spill, all actions taken in response to the spill, and proposed actions to be
taken to ensure spill does not recur..

SECTION VI
TOWN OF MADISON WATER PLANT RESIDUALS RECEIPT FORM

TOWN OF MADISON WTP RESIDUALS RECEIPT FORM
I , (printed name) have received
gallons/Wet tons of Town of Madison WTP Residuals, Town of Madison WTP Residuals
product label, and a copy of the most recent analysis of the product. I have read these
documents and agree to adhere to the directions specified on the Application Information
Sheet and the Product Label.
Signature of Receiver Date of Receipt

SECTION VII
APPLICATION RATES

APPLICATION RATES
Prior to an application event, a private land owner will contact Town of Madison to initiate an
application. This land owner will indicate the type of crop to be grown and the size of the field to
have the residuals distributed.
A mixed composite sample of the residuals to be land applied from Town of Madison WTP will be
collected prior to distribution efforts so that application rates for the crops can be set. Prior to the
distribution event, the fields scheduled to receive Town of Madison WTP Residuals will be
reviewed to insure the crop has been identified correctly and the field size is correct. Application
rates will be determined based on the solids content of the residuals, the height of the crop on the
receiver site, smothering potential of the crop, and nitrogen needs of the crop to be grown. During
the residual removal process, the solids of the residuals will be determined. If these soils are
significantly different from the original sample collected, the new solids content will be utilized to
further fine tune application rates. Additional percent solid samples will be collected if the solids
content of the removed residuals changes.
Application rates will be limited based either:
• the initial hydraulic rate of the site and soils,
• the residuals smothering the currently growing crop,or
• the agronomic rate of the crop as specified by realistic yield expectations based on the soil
series and crops found at: http://nutrients.soil.ncsu.edu/yields/
whichever of these three factors is most limiting. Based on my knowledge of potential receiver
sites, the initial hydraulic loading rates for the soils should be no more than 27,000 gallons per acre
per day or 25 wet tons per acre, but may be less than that depending on slope, cover, soil
assimilation. Application should not occur at a rate that the residuals may experience runoff from
the receiver site. Re-application of sites will be based on these same factors. If there are questions
concerning an individual application rate for a receiver site,consult a licensed soil scientist.

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION CERTIFICATION FORM
iit#: WQ0019753 County: Rockingham Year: 2007
Facility Name(as shown on permit): Town of Madison WTP
Land Application Operator: Precision Land Application, Inc. Phone: [phone]
Land application of residual solids as allowed by the permit occurred during the past calender year?
❑ Yes in No If No, skip Part A, and Part B and proceed to the certification. Also, if residuals were
generated but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the residuals were handled.
Part A:
Total number of application fields in permit:
Total number of fields land application occurred during the year:
Total amount of dry tons applied during the year for all application sites:
Total number of acres land application occurred during the year:
Part B:
Facility was compliant during calendar year with all conditions of the land application permit
(including but not limited to items 1-12 below) issued by the Division of Water Quality. ❑ Yes ❑ No
If no please, provide a written description why the facility was not compliant, the dates, and explain
corrective action taken.
1. Only residuals approved for this permit were applied to the permitted sites.
2. Soil pH was adjusted as specified in the permit and lime was applied (if needed)to achieve a soil pH of at
least 6.0 or the limit specified in the permit.
3. Annual soils analysis were performed on each site receiving residuals during the past calendar year and three
(3) copies of laboratory results are attached.
4. Annual TCLP analysis was performed and three (3) copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
5. All other monitoring was performed in accordance with the permit and reported during the year as required
and three (3) copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
6. The facility did not exceed any of the Pollutant Concentration Limits in Table 1 of 40 CFR Part 503.13 or the
Pollutant Loading Rates in Table 2 of 40 CFR part 503.13 (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503 regulated facilities).
7. All general requirements in 40 CFR Part 503.12 and management practices in 40 CFR Part 503.14 were
complied with(applicable to 40 CFR Part 503 regulated facilities).
8. All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with or, in the case of a deviation,
prior authorization was received from the Division of Water Quality.
9. No contravention of Ground Water Quality Standards occurred at a monitoring well or explanations of
violations are attached to include appropriate actions and remediations.
10. Vegetative cover as specified in the permit was maintained on this site and the crops grown were removed
in accordance with the crop management plan.
11. No runoff of residuals from the application sites onto adjacent property or nearby surface waters has occurred.
12. All buffer requirements as specified on the permit were maintained during each application of residuals.
"I certify, under penalty of law,that the above information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true,
accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibility of fines and-imprisonment for knowing violations."
RECEIVED
N.C.Dept.of ENR
Micheal O. Morrison, Dir., Public Utilities�U� 2 4 2008 '�Z � /�6l
Permittee Name and Title (type or print) Winston-Saiem. Signature of Permittee Date
Regional Office
Signature of Preparer* Date Signiture of Land Applier Date
(if different from Permittee) (if different from Permittee and Preparer)
* Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9 (r)
DENR FORM ACF(5/2003)

MTh*
moo Town of Madison120 N. Market StreetRECErvso ' Madison,North Carolina 27025 rv.c.Dept.
[phone] • Fax: [phone]
JUN 2 4 2008
�y4RiEREO��1 www.townofmadison.org
Winston-Salem
Regional Office
June 16, 2008
RECEIVED I DENR I DWQ
Mr. Ed Hardee AQUIFcR'PPnTFl:T!CN SFCTION
NCDWQ JUN Y 3
Aquifer Protection Section
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,NC 27699-1636
Mr. Hardee,
I apologize for not getting the report submitted on time. We did not dispose of any solids this year, we
are continuing to hold solids in the storage facility.
Please contact me at 336-427-0221 if you need any further information.
Sincerely,
Micheal O. Morrison
Utilities Director,
Town of Madison
[e-mail]

o�oF W A rFgQG Michael F.Easley,Governor
William G.Ross Jr.,Secretary
r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
O < Coleen H.Sullins,Director
Division of Water Quality
•
June 11, 2008 RECEIVED
N.C.Deot cf FNn
JUNs320%
CERTIFIED MAIL#7006 2150 0003 5466 7233 I —
RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED Regional Office
Micheal O. Morrison
Town of Madison
120 North Market Street
Madison, NC 27025 •
Subject: NOTICE OF VIOLATION (NOV-2008-PC-0422)
FAILURE TO SUBMIT ANNUAL REPORT
Permit No. WQ0019753
Town of Madison Residuals Distribution Program
Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Morrison:
One of the requirements of your non-discharge permit is the submittal of an annual report to the
Division of Water Quality by March 1st of each year. As of this date, our records indicate that the
2007 annual report has not been submitted for the subject facility.
Failure to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of your permit may
result in the assessment of civil penalties of up to $25,000.00 per violation per day, in
accordance with North Carolina General Statute §143-215.6A.
Please respond to this notice of violation within 15 calendar days of its receipt, either by
submitting three copies of the annual report or records, indicating the report was submitted.
Submit to:
Ed Hardee
Division of Water Quality
Aquifer Protection Section
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,NC 27699-1636
Nothing in this letter should be taken as relieving from you the responsibility for failing to
submit the annual report in a timely manner. A decision as to the appropriateness of an
enforcement action will be made following the receipt of your response.
N,y�e hnCarolina
Nvatura!!y
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh,NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Internet:http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh,NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer—50%Recycled/10%Post Consumer Paper Customer Service: (877)623-674"

If you have any questions regarding this letter,please contact Ed Hardee of our Central Office
staff at [phone].
Sincerel
Kim H. Colson, P.E., Supervisor
Land Application Unit
KHC:eh
cc:
APS Central Files
Land Application Unit

TF9 Michael F..Easley,Governor
William G.Ross Jr.,Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
.0 Alan W.Klimek,P.E.Director
Division of Water Quality
February 26, 2007
Micheal O. Morrison,Utilities Director
Town of Madison
120 North Market Street
Madison,NC 27025
Subject: Permit Renewal
Permit No. WQ0019753
Distribution of Residual Solids (503 exempt)
Town of Madison
Dear Mr. Morrison;
The Land Application Unit received you request for an extension of time to renew the subject
permit. The current permit expires February 28, 2007. Permit condition V.7. requires that a
permit extension be requested six months prior to expiration.
The Land Application Unit grants an extension for the submission of the permit renewal. The
renewal will be due July 31, 2007.
Please note that an annual report is required to be submitted annually, on or before March 1st
each year. If no application occurred a report is required, stating no application.
If you need addition information concerning this matter,please do not hesitate to contact me at
[phone] or by email at ed.hardee@ncmail .net.
Sincerely,
E. D. Hardee
cc: Noreletteraniraiimmetriiisisaa.APS
APS Central Files
Noe Carolina
tura!!y
Aquifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center Raleigh,NC 27699-1636 Telephone: [phone]
Internet:www.ncwateruualitv.org Location: 2728 Capital Boulevard Raleigh,NC 27604 Fax 1: [phone]
Fax 2: [phone]
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer—50%Recycled/10%Post Consumer Paper Customer Service: [phone]

cit 0♦
Mayor -� :Town Manager
Kenneth Y.Hawkins �?
Robert F.Scott,Jr.
[e-mail]
�rRriato
Board of Aldermen Town Attorney
Mickey Silvers Town of Madison Michael Cassidy
Janice Tate 427-2559
Arthur Gwaltney 120 N. Market Street
Carolyn Collins Madison,North Carolina 27025 Town Clerk
Bobby Pleasants Lannette Jo
Monte McIntosh [phone] • Fax: [phone] [e-mail]
www.townofmadison.org
February 21, 2007
RECEIVED I DENR 1 DWQ
Mr. Ed Hardee AQUIFER PRnTFCTIC;N F ,TIQN
NCDWQ • `' ' :i n
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,NC 27699-1636
Mr. Hardee,
It recently came to my attention that the Town of Madison Land Application Permit# WQ0019753 was
expiring soon. I recently contacted Chris Alexander of PLA to submit a permit renewal application.
I am requesting a 6 month extension to the current permit to give us time to perform the required testing.
The town has yet to dispose of any WTP solids and anticipates doing so in late July.
Please contact me at 336-427-0221 if you need any further information.
Sincerely,
Micheal O. Morrison
Utilities Director,
Town of Madison
[e-mail]

fradAsp, &'QC?o !175J .22)0S—
Annual Report Review SOP
1. Annual Land Application Certification Form
• Was a certification form submitted?
• Was land application conducted during the reported year? 4/D
• How many dry tons and dry tons per acre were applied?
• Were the applications within the permitted amount?
• Verify PAN if more than 10 tons/act
• Did it indicate compliance?
• Was it signed by the appropriate people?
2. Monitoring
• Were the analyses conducted at the required frequency?
• Were the metals analyses reported on the Residual Sampling Summary Form?
• Were the results reported in mg/kg?
• Were the heavy metals within ceiling concentration permit limits?*
• If no, were the lab analyses attached?
• Were all the required parameters tested?
• Was TCLP analysis conducted?
3. Field Summary
• Were the land application events recorded on the Field Summary Forms?
• Was a Field Summary Form submitted for each field?
• Were all the residuals applied to permitted land?
• Were all the residuals applied from permitted sources?
• Were the field loading rates for each metal and PAN calculated(year to date)?
• Were the cumulative pollutant loading rates calculated?
• Were the calculations correct?
• Were the PAN loading rates within permit limits?
• Were the heavy metal cumulative pollutant loading rates within permit limits?
• Were the residuals applied on a suitable crop?
• Were the applications conducted during the crop's growing season?
• Were the Field Summary Forms complete?
4. Pathogen and Vector Attraction Reduction
• Was a signed copy of the Pathogen and Vector Attraction Reduction Form submitted?
• Did the form indicate the period of coverage,the residual class, and the pathogen reduction alternative and the
vector attraction reduction option used?
• Was the appropriate documentation to show pathogen and vector attraction reduction included in the report?
• Was pathogen and vector attraction reduction demonstrated according to 40 CFR Part 503?
5. Soil Tests
• Was a Standard Soil Fertility Analysis conducted for each application field?
• Were the soil pH's 6.0 or greater for each application field?
• Were the copper and zinc indexes in the soil less than 3000 for each application field?
6. General
• Was the report in the proper format?
• Were any parts of the annual report missing?
• Was the report submitted on time? / n
* Any violations of ceiling concentrations should be reported to Pretreatment for municipalities only.

ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION CERTIFICATION FORM
('t43
Permit#: WQ0019753 County: Rockingham Year: 2005
Facility Name (as shown on permit): Town of Madison WTP
Land Application Operator: Precision Land Application, Inc. Phone: [phone]
Land application of residual solids as allowed by the permit occurred during the past calender year?
0 Yes L9' No If No,skip Part A,and Part B and proceed to the certification. Also, if residuals were
generated but not land applied, please attach an explanation on how the residuals were handlesicEivw
N.C.Dept.of ENR
Part A:
Total number of application fields in permit: APR 1 7 7nnfi
Total number of fields land application occurred during the year: Winston-Salem
R—jL-red Ofpcv
Total amount of dry tons applied during the year for all application sites:
Total number of acres land application occurred during the year:
Part B:
Facility was compliant during calendar year with all conditions of the land application permit
(including but not limited to items 1-12 below) issued by the Division of Water Quality. 0 Yes ❑ No
If no please, provide a written description why the facility was not compliant, the dates, and explain
corrective action taken.
1. Only residuals approved for this permit were applied to the permitted sites.
2. Soil pH was adjusted as specified in the permit and lime was applied (if needed) to achieve a soil pH of at •
least 6.0 or the limit specified in the permit.
3. Annual soils analysis were performed on each site receiving residuals during the past calendar year and three
(3) copies of laboratory results are attached.
4. Annual TCLP analysis was performed and three (3) copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
5. All other monitoring was performed in accordance with the permit and reported during the year as required
and three (3) copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
6. The facility did not exceed any of the Pollutant Concentration Limits in Table 1 of 40 CFR Part 503.13 or the
Pollutant Loading Rates in Table 2 of 40 CFR part 503.13 (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503 regulated facilities).
7. All general requirements in 40 CFR Part 503.12 and management practices in 40 CFR Part 503.14 were
complied with (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503 regulated facilities).
8. All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with or, in the case of a deviation,
prior authorization was received from the Division of Water Quality.
9. No contravention of Ground Water Quality Standards occurred at a monitoring well or explanations of
violations are attached to include appropriate actions and remediations.
10. Vegetative cover as specified in the permit was maintained on this site and the crops grown were removed
in accordance with the crop management plan.
11. No runoff of residuals from the application sites onto adjacent property or nearby surface waters has occurred.
12. All buffer requirements as specified on the permit were maintained during each application of residuals.
"I certify,under penalty of law, that the above information is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true,
accurate,and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,
including the possibility of fines and imprisonment for knowing violations."
c l7cc� r SCo-C-A- Town 14 trc E
Permittee Name and Title (type or print C�� Sign ire of Pe to Date
4Fi VED
,qA,mk d ��/ 3/30/c43
Signature of Preparer* *eat?
P oftNe i iture of Land Applier Date
oN
(if different from Permittee) ��'"9 U f different from Permittee and Preparer)
Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9 (r)
DENR FORM ACF (5/2003)

g°
ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION CERTIFICATION FORM
Permit Number: W00019753 County: Rockingham Year: 2004
Facility Name (as shown on permit): Town of Madison WTP
Land Application Operator: Precision Land Application, Inc. Phone #: [phone] m a 4 2005
Land application of residuals as allowed by the above permit occurred during the past calen thye r
❑ YES ® NO. If NO,skip Part I and Part II and proceed to the certification. Also,if residuals were generated but not
land applied,please attach an explanation of how the residuals were handled.
Part I
• Total number of application fields in permit:
• Total number of fields land application occurred during the year:
• Total amount of dry tons applied during the year for all application sites:
• Total number of acres land application occurred during the year:
Part II
Facility was compliant during calendar year with all conditions of the land application permit
(Including but not limited to items 1-12 below) issued by the Division of Water Quality
❑ YES ❑ NO.
IF NO PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN DESCRIPTION WHY THE FACILITY WAS NOT COMPLIANT,THE DATES,AND
EXPLAIN CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN.
1. Only residuals approved for this permit were applied to the permitted sites.
2. Soil pH was adjusted as specified in the permit and lime was applied (if needed) to achieve a soil
pH of at least 6.0 or the limit specified in the permit.
3. Annual soils analysis was performed on each site receiving residuals during the past calendar
year and three (3) copies of laboratory results are attached.
4. Annual TCLP analysis was performed and three (3) copies of certified laboratory results are
attached.
5. All other monitoring was performed in accordance with the permit and reported during the year as
required and three (3) copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
6. The facility did not exceed any of the Pollutant Concentration Limits in Table 1 of 40 CFR Part
503.13 or the Pollutant Loading Rates in Table 2 of 40 CFR Part 503.13. (applicable to 40 CFR Part
503 regulated facilities)
7. All general requirements in 40 CFR Part 503.12 and management practices in 40 CFR Part
503.14 were complied with. (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503 regulated facilities)
8. All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with or, in the case of a
deviation, prior authorization was received from the Division of Water Quality.
9. No contravention of Ground Water Quality Standards occurred at a monitoring well or.
explanations of violations are attached to include appropriate actions and remediatiol n
10. Vegetative cover as specified in the permit was maintained on this site and the crops groowi'T" %%•-, r�$
removed in accordance with the crop management plan. MAR
11. No runoff of residuals from the application sites into adjacent property or nearby surfac ttri vu
has occurred. WA118•
12.All buffer requirements as specified on the permit were maintained during each aP �,�r•,
residuals. °'
"I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF LAW,THAT THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS,TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
AND BELIEF,TRUE,ACCURATE,AND COMPLETE. I AM AWARE THAT THERE ARE SIGNIFICANT PENALTIES FOR
SUBMITTING FALSE INFORMATION,INCLUDING THE POSSIBILITY OF FINES AND IMPRISONMENT FOR KNOWING
VILOATIONS." �y t
�I7G(`! ,'1 1 . `lar,i ( �CU Mom:� c*e!� -5,'Ll�zt.i
Permittee Name and Title S Signat 'e of Permi Date
-e:c.--1 /'0 �y1f�y,t 2—2-S -Uy / C.
Signature of Preparer Date • •r' re of pplier Date
(if different from Permittee) '(If afferent from Permittee and Preparer)
F RM CF 10/94
Note:Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9(r) DEM O ( )

W A T� Michael F.Easley,Governor
R William G.Ross Jr.,Secretary
0 th C vir QG Norarolina Department of Enonment and Natural Resources
rAlan W.Klimek,P.E.Director
Division of Water Quality
0 Coleen H.Sullins,Deputy Director
Division of Water Quality
May 12, 2004
Certified Mail
Return Receipt Requested
RECEIVED
N,C.Dent,c?ENR
Micheal O. Morrison JUN 2 1
120 N Market St. 2004
Madison, NC 27025 Winston-Salem
Regional Office
Subject: Failure to Submit Annual Report
Distribution of Residual Solids (503 exempt)
Town of Madison Residuals Disrtibution Program
Permit Number WQ0019753
Rockingham County
To Whom It May Concern,
One of the requirements of your non-discharge permit is the submittal of an annual report to the
Division of Water Quality by March 1st of each year. Our records indicate that the 2003 annual
report has not been submitted for the subject facility. If you have records indicating the report
was submitted, that land application did not occur in 2003, or if you have other relevant
information regarding the facilities operation during 2003, please send such information to the
following address by no later than ten (10) days following receipt of this letter
DENR/DWQ/Water Quality Section
Non-Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Nothing in this letter should be taken as relieving from you the responsibility for failing to
submit the report in a timely manner. A civil penalty of not more than$10,000 per day, pursuant
to N.C.G.S. 143_215.6, may be assessed against a person who fails to act in accordance with the
terms, conditions, or requirements of the subject state permit.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please contact me at [phone] ext. 565.
Sincerely,
E,- -42
E D Hardee,Environmental Specialist III
Cc: Non-Discharge Compliance/Enforcement
Winston Salem Regional Office
Central Files
C.Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1617 [phone] Customer Service
1-877-623-6748

05
ANNUAL LAND APPLICATION CERTIFICATION FORM
Permit Number: WQ00019753 County c angham Year: 2002
Facility Name (as shown on permit): Town of Madison WTP
Land Application Operator: Precision Land Applicati Irp.Fl Phone#: [phone]
Land application of residuals as allowed by the ak1,v a it ocRifEirkluring the past calendar year
❑ YES ® NO. If NO, skip Part I and Part II and procggcl the berxifiication. siduals were generated but not
land applied, please attach an explanation of how the residuals wea handled. �� ;
A R - 5 .2003 /
Part I
• Total number of application fields in permit: li'' = ,. .7- .. 1g
• Total number of fields land application occurre urin lrhe ye r r
• Total amount of dry tons applied during the year for ail appliils:
• Total number of acres land application occurred during the year:
Part II
Facility was compliant during calendar year with all conditions of the land application permit
(Including but not limited to items 1-12 below) issued by the Division of Water Quality
❑ YES ❑ NO.
IF NO PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN DESCRIPTION WHY THE FACILITY WAS NOT COMPLIANT,THE DATES,AND
EXPLAIN CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN.
1. Only residuals approved for this permit were applied to the permitted sites.
2. Soil pH was adjusted as specified in the permit and lime was applied (if needed) to achieve a soil
pH of at least 6.0 or the limit specified in the permit.
3. Annual soils analysis was performed on each site receiving residuals during the past calendar
year and three (3) copies of laboratory results are attached.
4. Annual TCLP analysis was performed and three (3) copies of certified laboratory results are
attached.
5. All other monitoring was performed in accordance with the permit and reported during the year as
required and three (3) copies of certified laboratory results are attached.
6. The facility did not exceed any of the Pollutant Concentration Limits in Table 1 of 40 CFR Part
503.13 or the Pollutant Loading Rates in Table 2 of 40 CFR Part 503.13. (applicable to 40 CFR Part
503 regulated facilities)
7. All general requirements in 40 CFR Part 503.12 and management practices in 40 CFR Part
503.14 were complied with. (applicable to 40 CFR Part 503 regulated facilities)
8. All operations and maintenance requirements in the permit were complied with or, in the case of a
deviation, prior authorization was received from the Division of Water Quality.
9. No contravention of Ground Water Quality Standards occurred at a monitoring well or
explanations of violations are attached to include appropriate actions and remediations.
10. Vegetative cover as specified in the permit was maintained on this site and the crops grown were
removed in accordance with the crop management plan.
11. No runoff of residuals from the application sites into adjacent property or nearby surface waters
has occurred.
12. All buffer requirements as specified on the permit were maintained during each application of
residuals.
"I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF LAW,THAT THE ABOVE INFORMATION IS,TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
AND BELIEF,TRUE,ACCURATE, AND COMPLETE. I AM AWARE THAT THERE ARE SIGNIFICANT PENALTIES FOR
SUBMITTING FALSE INFORMATION, INCLUDING THE POSSIBILITY OF FINES AND IMPRISONMENT FOR KNOWING
VILOATIONS." 11 ,� /J
Oi i!.N.es.� 0,>•'lofl�3on (.141 I .i. D,i�-Lr 44.�.1� 7%-s—� 2-2-7-0
Permittee Name and Title Signature of Permittee Date
Signature of Preparer Date Signature of Land Applier Date
(if different from Permittee) (If different from Permittee and Preparer)
Note: Preparer is defined in 40 CFR Part 503.9(r) DEM FORM CF (10/94)

c.WAIF Michael F.Easley,Governor
William G.Ross Jr.,Secretary
O� QG North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Uj r Alan W.Klimek,P.E.Director
Division of Water Quality
December 2, 2002
Certified Mail
Return Receipt Requested
Rp.CEIVED
Mike Morrison t t ;�f MAN
North Market Street N.C. �`
Madison,NC 27025 DEC 1 02082
Subject: Notice of Violation Failure to Submit Annual Report r";
Distribution of Residual Solids (503 exempt) Regional; Off-
Town of Madison Residuals Distribution Program -
Permit Number WQ0019753
Rockingham County
To Whom It May Concern:
One of the requirements of your non-discharge permit is the submittal of an annual report to the Division of
Water Quality by March 1st of each year. Furthermore, you were sent a reminder letter, reminding you of this
requirement and stating such reports for the calendar year 2001 must be submitted no later than March 1st 2001.
Our records indicate that the 2001 annual report has not been submitted for the subject facility. If you have
records indicating the report was submitted, that land application did not occur in 2001, or if you have other
relevant information regarding the facilities operation during 2001, please send such information to the
following address by no later than ten (10) days following receipt of this letter
DENR/DWQ/Water Quality Section
Non-Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
Nothing in this letter should be taken as relieving from you the responsibility for failing to submit the report in a
timely manner. A civil penalty of not more than $10,000 per day,pursuant to N.C.G.S. 143-215.6, may be
assessed against a person who fails to act in accordance with the terms, conditions, or requirements of the
subject state permit. A decision as to the appropriateness of an enforcement action will be made following the
receipt of your response.
If you have any questions regarding this request,please contact Daryl Merritt of our central office staff at
[phone] ext. 581.
Sincerely,
Daryl o ental Specialist I
Cc: Non-Discharge Compliance/Enforcement
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Central Files
mar`
N.C.Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh,NC 27699-1617 [phone] Customer Service
1 800 623-7748

Missing 2001 Annual Land Application Reports
Subject: Missing 2001 Annual Land Application Reports
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 15:51:43 -0500
From:Abner Braddy <[e-mail]>
Organization: NC DENR Water Quality
To: daryl merritt<[e-mail]>
CC: Steve Mauney <[e-mail]>, Sue White<[e-mail]>,
karen rust<[e-mail]>, Wes Hare <[e-mail]>,
Corey Basinger<[e-mail]>,
David Russell <[e-mail]>,Mike Mickey <[e-mail]>
A review of the files for the facilities listed on the subject Excel spreadsheet indicates the following:
Town of Wilkesboro\W00000092\Wilkes. WSRO has a copy of their Annual Certification Form, which
indicates its receipt in the Central Office on 2\21\02. It also indicates no residuals were applied in calendar
year 2001. NOTE: The "Year" section on the top right hand corner of the Certification Form erroneously
lists 2000. The dated signature at the bottom of the form clearly indicates, however, that the information
was for the year 2001.
Town of Yadkinville\W00001800\Yadkin. WSRO has a copy of both the Annual Certification Form, as
well as their Annual Report (100.64 dry tons applied in '01). They were received in the Central Office on
2\15\02. NOTE: Throughout their Report, they erroneously list the Permit#as WQ0001801, as opposed to
WQ0001800. Perhaps that is why they showed up on the list.
Colonial Pipeline\W00005809\Guilford. WSRO has a copy of both the Annual Certification Form, as well
as their Annual Report(1265.48 dry tons applied in '01). It does appear that they missed the March 1
deadline for submittal of the info. (date stamped in Central Office as received 3\13\02).
Town of Pilot Mountain\W00006637\Surry. WSRO cannot locate a copy of their 2001 Annual
Certification Form. Technically, the Permit expired on 3\31\02 (with the knowledge of the Permittee).
Since February of the year 2000,the Town has carried their residuals to the Surry County landfill, thus they
intentionally let the Permit expire. The last Annual Certification Form they sent in (that we can locate) was
to cover calendar year 2000. To further complicate matters, WSRO has a copy of a letter dated 2\11\00
from the Town to the Non-Discharge Permitting Unit,requesting that this Permit(as well as their
conventional land app. Permit, WQ0010383)be "placed in an inactive status until further notice". They
may have been under the impression that this request relieved them from the Annual Certification
requirement. We can find no response to their request to have the Permits' status changed. Not sure what
you'll want to do with this one,but the Region is confident that no residuals were land applied during the
'01 calendar year.
Randolph Packing Company\W00017837\Randolph. This Permit has been through several Draft
permutations,but has yet to be issued in Final form.
• • e ! • •' • • „ — M'' ._'ermit was just issued on March 4, 2002, thus
(hopefully), no activities would have occurred in calendar year '01.
I will send you a copy of the Annual Certification Form for Wilkesboro. I can also send you a copy of the
Pilot Mtn. letter of 2\11\00 referenced above if that would be of any use to you. With respect to the actual
Annual Reports for Yadkinville and Colonial Pipeline, we only have one copy of each here. I know the
info. contained in the reports must be entered into BIMS (I also know I'm not remotely capable of doing
so). Do you want me to send you our copy in the Courier, and you can send them back after the data is
entered?Let me know how you want to work it.
1 of 2 11/25/2002 11:13 AM

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GROUNDWATER SECTION �EIVEO
pt. of ENR
•
June 4, 2001 , JUN t 5 2001
MEMORANDUM Regic,u;
To: Kim Colson
cc:
Through: Debra Watts O
ON•i(i .
From: Brian Wootton Ar
Subject: Madison, Town of
Rockingham County
WQ0019753 /GW01060
The Groundwater Section has reviewed the subject permit application for alum residuals
deposition. Approximately 100 dry tons per year are produced from the Town of Madison Water
Treatment Plant and four(4)methods of disposal are proposed. The methods of disposal proposed are:
apply the residuals as an amendment to the cap of the closed town landfill;use the residuals as road fill
material for Department of Transportation highway construction projects; apply residuals to private
properties as a fill material; and apply the residuals to a lined landfill. According to the permit
application,the residuals meet Class A specifications. If the residuals are to be applied to the landfill(s),
then the permit applicant must contact the Solid Waste Section for approval.
The Groundwater Section has no objection to apply residuals to roadbed construction sites
and private properties as long as the sampling results indicate the residuals meet Class A
specifications:
Any groundwater quality monitoring, as deemed necessary by the Division, shall be provided.
If there are any questions please call Brian Wootton at [phone].
Page 1 of 2 C:\cc\madison2.doc

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GROUNDWATER SECTION
08 May 2001
MEMORANDUM
TO: Brian Wooten, Permits and Compliance, GW Section, CO, Raleigh
THROUGH: Sherri Knight, Supervisor, GW Section, WSRO
FROM: Jim Brown, Hydrogeological Technician, GW Section, WSRO
SUBJECT: Alum Residuals Application, Town of Madison North Carolina, 120 North
Market Street, Madison, Rockingham County, Permit Renewal Permit Number:
WQ0019753, GW01060
On 27 March 2001 the Winston-Salem Regional Office, Groundwater Section,
received the request for Residuals Application for the Town of Madison North
Carolina. The contractor for Town of Madison application is Precision Land
Application (PLA) , Inc. , 4022 White Plains Road, Roaring River, NC 28669. Point of
Contact for PLA is Ms. Chris Kirkman (336) 766-0328.
The Town of Madison WTP has a designed flow of 1.5 million gallons per day
(mg/d) with a current 0.6 mg/d flow. The residual volume is 100 dry tons/year
stored in drying basins. The proposal involves three (3) option for disposal that
as a primary to be applied a top of the cap on the closed town dump, second as a
Department of Transportation (DOT) road fill and third to be applied to private
acreage.
The Groundwater Section has reviewed the application and attached information.
The primary application option presents no problems if the residuals are categorized
as class "A" bio-solids.
The use of petroleum contaminated soil for road bed construction projects has
been approved in the past. It would seen to be reasonable to allow the alum
residuals to be used similarly under the same general conditions. Attached are
excerpts from the soil remediation permits general requirements that should probably
be written into the permit language if this option is allowed.
According to the 503 rules, with the third option of applying to private
property, the residuals would have to meet the class "A" Standards in order to have
a blanket approval for disposal on private property. If not, then individual
application sites would have to be applied for and evaluated seperately. .
The letter to the Solid Waste Section included in the application package mentions
using the residuals as a final cover at the Rockingham County Landfill. This wasn't
included in the Disposal Options Sought Section. If the landfill is utilized, then
proper proposals and permitting request must be sent to the Solid Waste Department
for evaluation including all collaborating data which has the pH ratings as listed
in the memorandum from the Department of Agriculture.

Soil Remediation Permit No. SR
• 0b�:s date
Page 2
2. In the event that the disposal and utilization of soils results in the creation of
nuisance conditions, the Permittee shall take immediate corrective action,
including those as may be required by the Division of Water Quality (hereinafter
Division).
3. The issuance of this permit shall not relieve the Permittee of the responsibility for
damages to surface waters or groundwaters resulting from the operation of this
facility.
4. The following minimum buffers shall be maintained from the edge of the roadbed
soil application area :
a) 100 feet from any habitable residence or place of public assembly under
separate ownership or to be sold;
b) 100 feet between the disposal area and any public or private water supply,
including wells;
c) 100 feet between the disposal area and waters classified as WS-II, WS-III,
or B;
d) 100 feet between the disposal area and the normal high water levels of
waters classified as SA or SB;
e) 100 feet between application area and any stream, lake, river or natural
drainage way;
f) 50 feet from any property line. [For DOT roadbed construction, 20 feet
from the edge of the DOT defined right-of-way.]
(boas
5. Nos , other than as specified in the permit
application, shall be utilized in roadbed construction.
- - . . . _ .. • •ns ruc i•n.
--R-e s i sit.k..a.1 S
7. Geirofrrittli shall not be stockpiled at the roadbed application site unless
they are stored in a leakproof vessel isolated from the environment.
8. No cet .natcd .,„tis shall be used for roadbed construction at any location
where the vertical separation between the contaminated soil and the seasonal high
water table is less than three (3) feet.
II. ROADBED CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS
1. Adequate measures shall be taken to prevent surface runoff from carrying any

.'r
Soil Remediation Permit No. SR
date
Page 3
disposed material into any surface waters.
r r• , , r r , ' • UUSL t luny- • •
• • • • • • • - a. • •e• construction.
res i cAA s
3. The hall be spread:
a) to a total thickness not to exceed four (4) feet after compaction, with
the contaminated soil being placed down in lifts of 8 - 14 inches and
compacted to 95% of the Standard Proctor maximum dry density;
AND
b) only onto that specific section of roadway identified in the permit
application.
4. A minimum of two (2) feet of compacted clean soil (or subbase) shall be place
over the coNimiminIligbil within two weeks of the contaminated soil being
placed down. rtr dk als
5. The road pavement shall be constructed such that it completely lies over the rer'Cl oplimagmileil. Additionally, the pavement shall extend over the soil on all
sides by at least four(4) feet.
III. MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
1. Any monitoring deemed necessary by the Division to ensure surface water and
groundwater protection will be established, and an acceptable sampling and
reporting schedule shall be followed.
U) (a sc\4- j--` uj Cite rep6v* rcethwss fr,
Dca-rani used wu . 30 dal, ab
IV. NONCOMPLIANCE REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
1. The permittee shall report by telephone to the Regional Office,
telephone no. ( ) - , as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24
hours or on the next working day following the occurrence, or first knowledge of
the occurrence, of any of the following:
restdko,lc
a) The disposal and or use of at a location or in a manner
which is not in accordance with the terms and conditions of this permit.

L_
Soil Remediation Permit No. SR
date
Page 4
y��i�a11
b) Any instance in which the 1 disposal and utilization
program results in a discharge of wastes to the groundwaters or surface
waters of the State in contravention of applicable assigned water quality
standards.
c) Any spillage or discharge from a vehicle or piping system transporting
qii to the roadbed construction site.
rest dual s
2. Persons reporting such occurrences by telephone shall also file a written report in
letter form within 15 days following first knowledge of the occurrence. This
report must outline the actions taken or proposed to be taken to ensure that the
problem does not recur.
V. INSPECTIONS
1. Adequate inspection and maintenance of the subject roadbed construction project
shall be provided by the Permittee to ensure compliance with applicable state,
federal or local laws and regulations.
2. Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division of Water
Quality may, upon presentation of credentials, enter and inspect any property,
premises or place on or related to the roadbed construction site at any reasonable
time for the purpose of determining compliance with this permit; may inspect or
copy any records that must be kept under the terms and conditions of this permit;
or may obtain samples of groundwater, surface water, soils or, if applicable, of
any leachate.
VI. ERAL CONDITIONS
1. This pe effective only with respect to the nature . • - . ume of
contaminated . .escribed in the applicatio. . er supporting information.
2. This permit is not transfera..
3. Failure to a. • . the conditions and i • ions contained in this permit may
sub.-• - 'ermittee to an enforcement actio . e Division of Water Quality in
ordance with North Carolina General Statute 14 - 6A, 6B or 6C.
4. The issuance of this permit does not preclude the Permittee fro • . plying with
any and all statutes, rules, regulations, or ordinances which may be i ' ed by

[Fwd:town of Madison-WQ0019753]
Subject: [Fwd: town of Madison - WQ0019753]
Date: Thu, 03 May 2001 10:58:34 -0400
From: Brian Wooton<[e-mail]>
Organization: DWQ - Groundwater Section
To: Sherri Knight<[e-mail]>,jim brown<[e-mail]>
Sherri, Jim
J. R. Joshi of the Water Quality Section (the permit reviewer) responded
to the e-mail message by phone and told me that the residuals will have
to meet Class A Standards and they (the Water Quality Section) will add
the Class A requirements in the permit.
Brian
Subject: town of Madison -WQ0019753
Date: Thu, 03 May 2001 10:43:17 -0400
From: Brian Wooton<[e-mail]>
Organization: DWQ - Groundwater Section
To: Jaya Joshi <[e-mail]>
CC: Sherri Knight<[e-mail]>,jim brown<[e-mail]>
J.R.
A few questions pertaining to the permit application for the Town of Madison (WQ0019753). Application
of Residuals
One of the four(4) options that the applicant is proposing, is to allow the residuals to be applied on private
property.
On the second page under the topic "Disposal Options Sought", the applicant, states "The town would keep
records of the sites, and quantities of residuals disposed. The town realizes that the Division of Water
Quality has concerns about public contact with these residuals due to possible Cryptosporidium
concentrations. Therefore the town is not requesting a General Distribution Permit, nor a Land Application
Permit,but a hybrid permit that would allow for lessened restrictions,while excluding public contact sites
such as parks, lawns, etc."
Since these residuals may be considered as a"hybrid", are these residuals considered Class A and should
meet criteria under 2H .0205(d)(8), or should these residuals meet criteria tinder 2H.0205(d)(6)?
J.R. What is your opinion; Should any of these options for disposal be be omitted, or is it O.K.?
•
If you can give me a response back soon, I would appreciate it.
Thanks,
Brian
1 c 1 5/3/2001 11:00 AM

t DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GROUNDWATER SECTION
3/23/0
RECEIVED
IIEMORANDiUM i ept.ofEHNR
TO: �ee-r/( 1C -ti MAR 2 7 2OU1
// yA!
��`j s Sd[f lv�L J.egional Office Y . ..,.. ".^+; m
FROM: (57-,4.-..) Za" 74 -1*---Ei Regiol1c:1 (..) l l ,r
SUBJECT: Application for �� Permit Renewal, Permit Amendment
IY! Neiv Permit Repair/Alteration of Exist. Disposal System!DEN
COMMENTS:
Facility Name: Z42 0,-. XIS d"--,-,_)J-`seesi(h q ' 1,72keU4"-)-J
Cou►ity: "iff2Gt r t1 #:,r.1. . ..
. .
Type of Project: /6$/ice_ V
APPLICABLE PERMIT NO.s: WQ /GJ 75'3 GW ©/0 e,
DEH ANIMAL WASTE(DWQ)
EPA(CONST. GRANTS) A to C
The Groundwater Section has received ONLY ONE (1)copy of the referenced permit application.A copy of the
application should have been sent to your Regional Water Quality Supervisor,so please use that copy for
your review - IF A COPY HAS NOT BEEN RECEIVED IN THE REGIONAL OFFICE,PLEASE LET ME
KNOW.
The Groundwater Section has received ONLY ONE (1)copy of the referenced permit application.A copy of the
application should have been sent to ,DEH's Regional Soil Specialist,so please use
that copy for your review - IF A COPY HAS NOT BEEN RECEIVED IN THE REGIONAL OFFICE, PLEASE
L T ME KNOW.
The`Groundwater Section received two(2)copies of the referenced permit application. One copy of the
application documents we received is attached.
Please review the application matey al for mpleteness. If you feel additional information is necessary,please
let me know no later than �67a/ . A copy of any formal request for additional information
will be forwarded to you.
If you do no ne any additional information to complete your review,please provide your final comments
byj �/ . If you request and/or receive additional information,your final comments
nre due no lat r than 14 clays after you receive the additional information
•
\9-98TRAN.SHL(rev. 9/29/98)

•
I e of North Carolina ;‘,
Department of Environment ANT fr
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary NCDENR
Kerr T. Stevens, Director NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RFCE`'Vs 0
March 21, 2001 N.C. Dept. of EHNR
APR 0 9 2001
TOWN OF MADISON
MIKE MORRISON
120 N MARKET ST11'1stf�n- tli;'f1"i
MADISON, N C 27025 Regianai Office
Subject: Acknowledgement of Application No.
WQ0019753
Town of Madison
Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Morrison:
The Non-Discharge Permitting Unit of the Division of Water Quality (Division) acknowledges receipt of
your permit application and supporting materials on March 21, 2001. This application package has been
assigned the number listed above.
Your application package has been assigned to J R Joshi for a detailed review. The reviewer will
contact you with a request for additional information if there are any questions concerning your
submittal.
If you have any questions, please contact J R Joshi at 919-733-5083 extension 363. If the reviewer is
unavailable, you may leave a message on their voice mail, and they will respond promptly.
PLEASE REFER TO THE ABOVE APPLICATION NUMBER WHEN MAKING INQUIRIES
ON THIS PROJECT.
Sin rely, -
. Colson, P.E.
Supervisor,Non-Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Winston Salem Regional Office,Water Quality Section
Permit Application File WQ0019753 CQ � 3' d
p b
DUE DATE
ITN/
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/10%post-consumer paper

•
cc: Permits and Engineering
County Health Dept.
Central Files
SOC PRIORITY PROJECT: No X
To: Permits and Engineering Unit
Water Quality Section
Attention: J. R. Joshi
Date: April 11. 2001
NON DISCHARGE STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
County: Rockingham
Permit No. WQ0019753
PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION
l. Facility and Address: Town of Madison
Water Filtration Plant
120 N. Market Street
•
Madison, N.C. 27025
2. Date of Investigation: April 11, 2001
3. Report Prepared by: David Russell
4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Number: Mike Morrison, Director of Public Utilities
for Madison 336-427-0221
5. Directions to Site: The closed Madison landfill is located near the junction of Hwy. 704
with Hwy 220 Bypass near Madison.
6. Size (land available for expansion and upgrading): The closed landfill covers
approximately 31 acres.
7. Topography (relationship to 100 year flood plain included):
The landfill is located above the flood plain.
Attach a U.S.G.S. map extract and indicate facility site.

U.S.G.S. Quad No. B19NW U.S.G.S. Quad Name Mayodan Quad
Latitude: 36° 22' 37" Longitude: 79° 56' 45"
8. Any buffer conflicts with location of nearest dwelling and water supply well?
Yes_ No X If Yes, explain:
9. Watershed Stream Basin Information: For old landfill
a. Watershed Classification: C
b. River Basin and Subbasin No.: Roanoke 02
c. Distance to surface water from disposal system: Approximately 2000 ft. via UT
to the Dan River.
PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This application is a request for a permit to dispose of water filter plant sediment. The
Town of Madison's water plant has two sedimentation basins. One of the basins has, for the past.
15 years, been used as a storage basin for water plant residuals. A permit is requested to allow
for the permanent disposal of the solids.
One proposed disposal site is a 31 acre closed landfill. The landfill was closed in the late
1960's. This landfill was never permitted by the Solid Waste section and as a result that Section's
approval is not required for past-closure uses. If approved, the sediment would be used as a cap
on the old dump. A vegetative cover would be established. Erosion control measures would be
established downslope of the application cover. Due to the gentle slope of the old landfill, runoff
and erosion would be of minimal concern.
Another disposal method proposed is to use the dry residuals as fill material in DOT
construction projects. This disposal would be acceptable to NC DOT if the material meets NC
DOT criteria prior to its use.
Final disposal options requested would allow disposal of residuals on private property as
fill material. Land application of the residuals in slurry on non-specified private property sites is
also requested. Neither of these two options is recommended for approval by WSRO.,
It is recommended that a permit be issued for the disposal of the residuals on the old
landfill, as well as approval as fill material for DOT projects. Vegetative cover should be
maintained on the landfill. Records should be kept of the volume of residuals removed from the
water plant, as well as the destination of the residuals. The soil pH should be adjusted and
maintained to establish and maintain a healthy vegetative cover on the landfill.

Due to the chemical make-up of the residuals, it is felt neither of these disposal options
would pose any environmental 4.4 C. D/d Y 2-3
Signature of report preparer
Water Q y Regional Supervisor
23 - 0 /
•
Date
Non-Discharge Permit Staff Report
Version 10/92
Page 3

_ , ._ 4. .. •..,____-----•'' -,--,-.- _--7,...... .z.-'''''';-‘,'‘'1),
' ' •-' ., .,gi 7k,7' '.-......,-;_..., -----• , ' ---•:, : ,',.
V .
, 'f. '' 1.b 214 --....,,,- ..., /.. J----- ,----- ,.-f, - 1.--., - • - •
N..--. • •,., - . ..,0 , , 1/f `- 1'.. --. • • ,. „, . • f' '7 - - ,r-,C'fa.r.r. ._,..)„,))
__ \ ,-,..,,..,„,y-,----i.1,,... ." •!, (..i., ' "1„..,til. '4 '',.--;" `'-i".•-,3,,'..///'//41, ?..„1„,._..•••-ir:./....i -"":•-_,' -,./."-- ., ,
----___ \ :k..N.„:N.*-- vT•s":0. „ ,. .,•4„.'.. `j:'.. '''-i..,f ,„- „''',,,0.4'''.' -;:' , _011s4•;11,;,,'-'..,,V--7::-„1 tcY (,-,.„--'•;;;" -../Ir.,:-;-.%; .•-:--i
,.',",!%;..'.--„, ..:7-,:i:,`A\ • ' * `---- D ' l ;,., f',2::,-._, , ;•.;?'. T'--.,', 27,1--- .4cc--' 1%,.-k_,-, -,-.a_- ..0,,,,,,_-_:-.;7, -.>•A;44,1-.-!.`
/1/Pit((--..--- • ''', '. ---- / ,/ .Ick_7.- fik='," ---4'l' '::'-' ,..''''''-171,,- , ` 'Si.4tr----'‘‘-'•441- z‘".. --1>ii-12=''
_./.,,//, ',:.-1,',..1 ,•••%,j1::),), .; •-.. ''•-• ---_,-. 1,.)... _,--;:.---;: -.--...=;7'N,:''4_, 4'. - '.:-.••:.4`•-1-1-i'' ''''ir ---09f'''; 1-13
t `If' ]-.. '''-' ' VF-' ,,,,>,"'-'''''s, '._,-.,--:----:;____--..-------;--:--,-, --, -.----:, - -rt.-. ' ''....lt.,-,-- •,,,,.., , . , :),44.,V,------..... - ,,..,,, . ••
,..„,,r .. • . ., ,,,, ) ..:.,,,pa.___ — .„.....--__;-. .,-- ...;--_...4.4" ,c--;, .,, ',;, -re,J--.7 N.,;.--,-, ',:,...„,- 't „ ',,r,"------------4 ',
‘,,N,____
' : ''.'N-N.," ' ..e.- '•,",/...le t''';''1.1 „,,,T..,,--„,t'---jr.:,.;:? ,-• r -.:,,,==';,_;:?"-;;i if- ' .' ' ' IA,, i r . ---
64.
---s---:..):i.-:, .1),/6'‘., ',,--. 1. 7.)-y•--=-fic :: -...er,---.„---±,;* i'_"9------"-2, ---- . '--.,7 ! -= , ..- ,l, • ‘-‘,N -. -,-% ,,,-,': z.:. a.• ..
.....,,•44-- , ,.. 4...z,- : \•-.1,,.-_,. .:......4.i,N ' ____J• ....,..•...,,-.2,.,. . ..,„_.-„,:. - ----;,,,,-- ,_,.k.._"- ,..,, ,• '.,rr„'\ . At 4.,,....00., -,,,,::, . . ".-. f
/ "1 ,),t''''''*- '11 ' '''' -lik.-N,,,,---1-=-------" .,--,...r..0.---- "...'ri.--ry-.3-.P,--- -.4kre" - , -41,,:1 0 if•-•,,,1 1 4. .;-rir-'--r.', - ,'' , ' - - • ti
toolsz
:,-..-...--_--....,! ,, el,. 1. ,, \....,....._.,„.„-/:„., -1F,...,/, .....„•,- .,, - •••.- ,.,.,,,.. I, . -,,,,. ,--, .- ,.. II ,0"7,4., . p,i•-.,,,,,,_ ..c.....4-',.N,
,i'. 4'... ii., ",I: 1' , C.,-.2,.X1 1( .,,:t ..71.'-•''''' ' '•"!A -.-- ' , ..t.e. " , t:g`; 1, '..;1,1.., '•\-%,.,,- ''''' •---'' ;-:'- VI,
7....r....---
,, (44 II , , ' ,._ , : .,,,.,-,.-:•,..\', -; . ' I '
• ..._,.-_,- , . 7F-% i y4 3,),,, 7 ...,..i°.- ''' ...' ' ' ''%'.','
----?:" disid' .;4•,,.--•;1-'-‘,•;"'' I 43- J.,/ ', ' . .,,,,.....f,/,‘'''' "',,-- ;" ••• .,,,!..v....42•1 i, ,.......i - •.„1- .:,...--&r,.../, . . ,, , +
---• .....,'•:-.: -1,,-,4/6‘ 1 ..,,. if ," - '-,..•$:;' ,, 1
it
70094*
ce"....j
1 ,--,,,, .4,,.:,..,...z ,14,4„ 7//,11 na / :-.0. -w..''.„. .4.,.•,-,„. ...- e ..)‘11-Alk
)
-',- I _. f F°,1-ir,s,e0,:;,: • ',1_-_ 1,.i ...," ,
47,,#,::!:,4_,:,4411,,t1.,,,-4-..,i,_,,,,,.1, 4,1„e 60,,,,,,,A4-e// ' 3...1' .?-7, •4--,'\(..„:15v..H-...011_,* -\'-,,-_--1... 1 ---.-, --"c-Thi..-,.) ....lcsik 1 ' .... , ,,,,... .4. • - - -,c_rig" - ' •.4'.‘&-' ,-1 "
-h 'CI- ..'-'-'4,tilli ' i //, //_.„..,--icpiro7,* ,>r. ir ___, - •-• etik0 .`I - /...:,v,.'4,:*.,,t\4. 4 -,,•1 A:,,... „,„ .. .• ,, ,,,-, ,,‘,
__ .i,,,,, 4,1 • •-• -' ( ' ' '
: .;.6.,./1---**--1411.ii,-,113).'i-H' ' 1,77' j _,----,-"::*:•*-,. .11;," :// '''''‘ % . (s) Clai f ..,,,-,,;.0. .:1410..:.':,.. ': : . 7:7 i c' . ?.b.l.“. ji-''.k. .,::, ' :A,:
i
-,--,---6-..- .,...<- ,,, i Le. - • -c,-J 7 .
,• 74;4-.42, .
: . , . --, -- .- \ 2178 • , -* ......4
‘,/*-e,<-,...42.7-11,-16/ II ••,,;,:, 7: 1 , , z , 0 .\ ,..1 7 OD S',,..,-"is , . a. •. DaTn . -...,_, ,, ,,--, -. ' : _•.:. .- -__._,- ,_ . , •, ... ,,, . -_- -- . :
.• < /
'41, ic ''' / ifarX-- . -- - - , . • ?-
- \ % . 0,.I:. • .- .
i • . i • /1/04di-
••:--:-.4-:),:t\://A._,‘„,._,t_-7---t,,... _ •:, •_.•_.••___„,24•:,:_ 'f--) _ 4 . ••• -.- , ,. -_, . , -• • . - .. ,.' . : . . . . .•- .- ..-L
• /- I micinlo
. .
, , , 0 • •
. ..... . .
. . _. . .
••• - L
9 ,,, 40, vq,--42. . • ,.._,
)
)
,_ . . . . .
s ... • .
. .
•,..-
-4c,-
. .
. .
. ' , '',,,: - .',1•.,,,.: .., .. ,,:-) . -. :...‘. '. ... : . ' - . - , -.. ..
•-,-.- .- iN , . ., - .-
-. ,p. ..-•
_ . .
..,.. . . --,-- A, -.7 . _ . •
Aro -2/5-if' Nio- . • - - -ft • e 4, -,r4 101 -, .--r.'
.‘.i \\ \ -0---.N.,--- ..-‘: ,.-_4/ ' 4 : — — 7 , ---. 4.0.7._ 4/07...
_ ... \
..
''- (*ztti,aN...—' "'----ler ---L---4 ., . 0
.i .. .!
• c) \I
• .,„\\ A - •N a //I U. ", 'cip *-. 00
... •
7i • 4,.,,,fil , • -..-, .=,.._.
‘.'•• • i..•ll .... -.,-
. ,./
. •
•61. \..
N 2Lie
\ .1
•
CI
•
d's _ . . •- ) 4 fe
,
, , •
„....
..\
1._--
v 1 ‘., = ., s•....D.i / -‘141-r4 ! •,
_
)
''''' ! 4P1t:/7,< ---::777:iii-4,!: W "...fr, L.•
, ,•A t,' ,,,,,,.. r / ,.__ 1 ' "mmeziva—,...1,- -, ,..-• - ,to, ..1,41, ... . 4. -7 ,_ ."..,‘„,i,„4", _
-4 ii-li. : \ :_--- „...„.....„,„ . .. ;i,i..•
"- • ...:1 :1 s, ,.- ••., • ,N
,--, . .4./ _..„,iy L.-„• 0
, _ I
'04... . •Exi4 ,..I.Eatk" -7* 4 -- oo
..,„\
i't,,iirp 'f7r,711,7,7'filKialall i r ,, .. _ . --.. a‘t,.. 1. • < - ,',.41:3;',,, '''. ..**24.1",r - '' - - .'' ,:-
-----1*, -tz.114,!_‘.•), _-_4-1-1.r--- --siL---,_=1J1../i. „; 4;',„„4•• „, .. , z- . .... " ... ,,-,- . ,'" 4, .,4-7---',fit•..E.::: • . •i.-, • •
-,7"-.•.11 -`1' 1411,--'rita.----N-17,T.or I 6T.,,,..4 , ..:-.o. g ;,;• , ,p, i. ,,. ,i.t."' •'..- MO ' I.TC,I ''' '*'''' ' ,
, •.! relip, r.-jj, , iF,...0,11.IF ,, e , , .z.7„. \ ..,,, ,,..7_,,,.- , „i._"... a , , ., -_ _ - ,
;t,...._...31,16, _,1_, :,,L4,__.i.,?__.„0.'.....___,,,...— ___._.,. •,I AR. ,, •. ,-,,, . • \ . ,,,i- ,.; _.,. ' ' , ...---...1 i -
',,,..7-117.1i•Ril:-7 tetil,......,,t..,F-71 rc..-1-1/..- .i.aw 4,_41W,• .-1 '..- ' ., ' .. ... -.4"'„,, ‘ <4.,-.\--, .f.' , '
411
3,-`164'''''----"- Z.'wpwil'•--7'..,-,t1'::'' .4' ' it:: ...•.... .''''---91 • „,0,- ,,:-.- ''k, , I ,,I.: ,/,--X ''„.:' ,,,, . s:: --4 .., '','I . T. Fiii-, r--Ailike.-,.'f . ‘";'''.'di; ..k. '0'-''s\-!>..- .Cfe,'-'74,..„,YE,e). ft..,,, (< \'' ‘' • i, .° _L
",?!): ' !".'d I :WI' • ':?, 1' .f.,,,. .-ifie-Nt--:_,-.:-.., ,(0,-- ' ---4.=,A_,
17.;.. ,4. r tip k.e. •••,...;;••. - ,,,.„.. .. ., ._., -\..,, s,
1).3 vii kib tel.k .,/,,!„. 1, ,,,, , t40,,f0-07,5) - , Id (.,<;,- kri, • •,..,i,. .., ., ....:._ .,
.stkri7
I
..."‘ *I N\s\-'?'- ,.. f9 --';'i 4,-„,---,-- -4 .-4-, , ., - -, .--t. • :. „.
4, -„,,,... ,,:. • :, .,„. ....„__,,•
, .:..,,.......: .. ...,,,,--, .. , _,,,,__.—.• '___..:-- ---; /11V r.,,,,,,,,,'"j .<,‘• ,"" AN ,I a, Air' .7,„i",.--•..4ii‘ *j''-'%.: / l'i'• 'c* /.sle/1.7. '
' -...,-.';. . -''.7-.1.,-'''' --'''',I 04 i.,k•yk -',-',;•-`, ./ , •• •-•„ '•ili ".\*,,..;„, ''.' -R'74,..
vo, \
-,-.4.- ,....i(,....-„,-.,•...,4_1 I '"'"1". ), ,,..: i 7-...;.t-7, ,---;,.-.4.-:
i; ' '•.' ,...:;:-.;'.''..... -,,,!--.-r,- -." • `,.- - . ...1V.,4,1"....4.4W '' '-.)). i f,-,,,,, .,tl.,:. 11-f. t,'4'').'4, N '''' , 14)Nia 1:t*. .H':.4 ' .,, erk,...,„..),
'. . • :.•,.-.:,:.-::::-.,,, >,-,' . 0,,,,,,,,,,;;;,.1.(•. ..,,,-1;,,..,-„,k••iv, _,.., 6 , , ,,,,,,„0„:_•,,,,,, ,,,• 4,„ ,...--,..
..„. . . • -,tv.,-...,,,k, -do
,....„.-.. .•-.L::,• ____-_,•,:.- .3;'' ( ".- . 7 '14/'''''''..,-1(-,.'7-..''0 4. 1....-)V,,..,:r ',.// ,'-'..,,,t4,,,,\.-"Ii; \\.:' ;,..- 4>--. p, ,,.. .,....,_,, -tk ,:.1 .0.,,4. , . •
‘it...' 11 -' 01,.„. '''''1 t. '''„4, V._.••••pi i'''':••:" / A.41.---',41' I •, Q1,.-
'Vrk
.--..,'':): :-f-- ...r7)••• \\ ' 1+.1 -,r.',,, ••Akr,..„7172, is.,,,,,,,,,,,, 4.-•.•., t,-.„..,-, .„. „iv:J. ,,,,„ . „.,..,...„.,..,,,.....,./ 4,:_ _...,,,_.„..9/- •,..
t.......-‘ 6...,...ecitv 4,47z,41:„Itr/.4.2,,.1, „:„, ,,.._,;....,,„_..,. ,,,e_ ...• _, ii.... ,.. i.,... :,./....., - .,.....,,,,t40•.:„.,._ :.,•,,,,i.„:„_-:-). ,/,•.i..- __-_---.-„..K4-•-4,i-., .:„.0,1/,-.„--,-...
i
1 r :2qt'.??/.1'.'NN. 4:4.1:ii ' giir‘ '' 'A /Eli'' L-"'• ,, 't','',.59•3 zt,.-,;'.',5A.7,.'.X3.,104";,••-„;:'•,,.,44',';,- 4„,rk,r,.'5',49t4-0,M,`,I,,,ii?§,G.URMEM EENRSF EPIEAL'SD)2113!.my , . /.-,:,-,-n-2,if..h,is1vi.i0Lil.:l.2,.,..,:-ii-t-r.:!,,,tiLlA',A,'„,;,.,-,...4.-'1•,_- •1.,7 --""--....-P.,-..;.,•Y:.-• ,i'-......4..,59,,,,7,4'.g?:',,,'':•,&I.',.'4,-,..4:.14.,-1',:i,.,"
".'..'' . It'll'•.q.'"'' •,--1,4 ,Ile...4..,,re.,-, ;•<.',:ii,i<, : i,',,'.- , 4-,„7,7........,. .---.,.,,4,:e.6,; 4 ..E. -4,-,`x,.t4-.,;. ' .", ... • •,.,i5:1.'" 1,'''f'..24.4.‘"'"-',EN'6
4E. •",,..,1-..,,,,ET• ok.„110.44.you„ , E .t.Er lE r . • .' ,,,,`
.'.. s!',4','".' • :1 V...OWE'dt:,e'l' i'.'I. ::,.. '4,?'•-•• '... ,-• •.,.. .,..,,t4,,,,,,„,,,..0:- P. 4, .
..,:-, /`-:•; 1-4-rf...,, •V?:,g+.:Iti.,i :';:.i-•:',(441,-7: t.z.:44-•,..1'..i .-, V.:!%.. 0 smiiiiir
' •:. ' ' - MILE', 1 Yr. •t- •
MN '...:',•f.1_l:41-1.',. A.. y•I.;‘;;.'1`•;*.'i'•':•,4 '1 tribba,,WrOjnili, _„.:2,0, 6.0ltri6013 lag+44-0-061NAIr —Ifiritr-"Witr '- - r,:-:',4t.-;-T''-';. :.:-.'e'''''4'-:'•:.
000.., . )A,,•• ,3 r . 5000
r GN .'..,..e:.:.si" "4.!TP-ts,'.14•P',.X. ."...,e's .t.'. •
,,,,- , '• ..W.: ,.:,.4•,;st* -ii -‘1. ,, .1.,4-.1,...-. ,• , • .4 tem., ,/;ifieglip R-Viardart Q,•,...161.:•;'?I, ..•-s.p.' . ...e."..-
,, ....?„ 5.....,, -, . ..,.1,1„..ZW, ;44:k .I, ."`„!s!' V. .,.1,4,,,,,,„,,,,.X,44,5,4,Z.:«,,70,t-,,S 1•14fiattil,.......A, Metnitt-cpcir,O.,,tEfEjr?„,;,•f..7.47.247)41,,,-.1.'.i.',-,,-7,,,;„11 r., ''''•'''
4
,. . . ,....,,„‘„,,,,, ..,.,,,,,,,,, .,, ,,•,,,, . ...., r.,..0.:'' li=1E:=13:=aa:=11.=:. ,_ .........,‘„L „...,,, ,1,...,...4.... ., ..i4,4,,,,iy.4 •. ,
' . 0,1,4;..,a-,..., 1: i. • 7.,.. ,..•.•:•,,.::.40 „:. •
•- . .,
71 MILS 0 38 .. '',./-.`10 4.''.'i.-. ,It,' '-,...-. .'' 41`-e,,,,r,-.. w..- a„..,,, '''''i . ..... 0 .1 NI.. pp FvE :., ,,... - . ,,,-. , • ,.. -. 't --
1 : • - • 1.`:''''''''-'' /-•'' NATIONALGE6fSETin vCprirei 'NATI:I i'''.••;., ........,-.-, . .

Town of Madison
Rockingham County, NC
Permit Application for the
Distribution of Water Plant Residuals
**AD's,.
ortsic,&
s
. .
3$f4 q.#‘4'
RTE R ED ‘w
Prepared by:
Precision Land Application, Inc.
4022 White Plains Rd.
Roaring River, NC 28669
[phone]

PLA
Precision Land Application, Inc.
Permit Application for the Distribution of Water Plant
Residuals for the Town of Madison, NC
March 2001
Introduction
The Town of Madison's Water Treatment Plant produces an alum sludge from its
treatment process. This sludge has been allowed to build up in the drying basins of the
treatment facility for approximately 15 years. The Town would like to pursue a permit
that would allow for the disposal of these residuals in as un-restrictive a manner as
possible.
REt7.7!\!71,3
Table of Contents: N.C. �,' ` l
APR 0 9 2001
Section 1 Process description& disposal options sought in this permit.
Winston-Salem
Section 2 Permit Application Regional Office
Section 3 Biosolids Analysis
Section 4 Supporting Documentation(letters from the NCDA,&Division of Solid Waste).
PLA is dedicated to providing safe, environmentally sound, and cost-effective services to
our clients. If there are any questions or comments concerning this permit application,
please contact our office.
Sincerely,
es C. Alexander
President
4022 White Plains Rd. • Roaring River,NC 28669 • [phone]

Process Description
Water treatment sludge is defined as 'the accumulated solids or precipitate removed from
a sedimentation basin, settling tank, or clarifier in a water treatment plant'. The
accumulated solids are the result of chemical coagulation, flocculation, and sedimentation
of raw water.
The Town of Madison WTP receives its raw water from the Dan River. The raw water
then has alum added along with sodium hydroxide to coagulate the particulate matter.
Immediately following chemical injection is flash mixing followed by flocculation.
Sedimentation basins and filters follow the flocculation process. The solids collected in
the sedimentation basins, and the filters are then backwashed and collected in two drying
basins to await disposal.

Disposal Options Sought
There are several options that the Town believes would be beneficial and safe for
the disposal of their Water Treatment Plant Residuals and they are outlined in the
following paragraphs.
The first option, which is the primary disposal option that the town seeks to use,
involves using these residuals, on a dry basis, as an amendment to the cap of the closed
town dump. This dump was closed in the late 1960's. At the time of its closing current
laws did not require a very substantial cap to be placed on the dump. The town seeks the
ability under this permit to place these residuals on the cap in a maintenance capacity to
both thicken the cap and to repair any cracks or depressions in the cap. This disposal
method would keep the residuals on town owned property and would remove the
residuals from public contact. During this type of disposal, dump trucks would be used
to transport the dry residuals to the closed town dump and then grading equipment would
be used to distribute the residuals on the cap of the dump. Once the residuals have been
placed on the cap, a cover crop will be established to prevent erosion. A letter from the
Division of Solid Waste concerning this type of use can be found in Section 4 of this
permit package.
Another disposal option that the town would like incorporated in this permit
would allow for disposal of this residual, on a dry basis, as a fill material in a Department
of Transportation highway construction project. Precision Land Application, Inc. (PLA)
contacted Chris Kirkman, a NCDOT engineer, about this type of disposal. After
conferring with his superiors he indicated that this type of disposal would be acceptable,
but each instance of disposal would have to meet with NCDOT criteria prior to its use in
one of their projects. These criteria included current monitoring information of the
residuals to be used as well as gradation by the NCDOT labs to determine its suitability
as a fill material. This disposal option would keep the residual on public lands and would
limit public contact.
Another disposal option that the town requests in this permit would allow for
disposal of this residual on private property as a fill material on a dry basis, or land
applied in slurry form. The residual would be used in much the same way as it would be
used on the town dump as discussed above. Trucks would transport the residuals to the
disposal site and grading equipment would then be used to place the residuals onto the
land. Once graded, a cover crop would be established to prevent runoff and erosion on
the site. In slurry form, the residuals would be transported by tanker to the disposal site,
then spray applied to the surface of the land.
If no other options were available the town would dispose of the residuals in a
lined landfill. This option while safe is largely prohibitive due to the tipping fees at the
county landfill.

The town would keep records of the sites, and quantities of residuals disposed.
The town realizes that the Division of Water Quality has concerns about public contact
with these residuals due to possible Cryptosporidium concentrations. Therefore the town
is not requesting a General Distribution Permit, nor a Land Application Permit,but a
hybrid permit that would allow for lessened restrictions, while excluding public contact
sites such as parks, lawns, etc.
One concern when establishing a cover crop on this type of residual is aluminum
toxicity. A letter from the NCDA is included in section 4 of this permit package that
addresses this concern.

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
Non-Discharge Permit Application Form
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL)
DISTRIBUTION OF OTHER RESIDUAL SOLIDS
This application is intended for facilities which are EXEMPT from 40 CFR Part 503
GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Applicant's name(please specify the name of the municipality,corporation, individual, etc.):
Town of Madison
2. Print owners or signing official's name and title(the person who is legally responsible for the facility and its compliance):
Menke Morrison, Director of Public Utilities
3. Mailing address: 120 N. Market St.
City: Madison State: NC Zip: 27025
Telephone Number: ( 336 ) 4 2 7—0 2 21
4. Application Date: 3-13-01
5. Fee Submitted: S 400. 00 [The permit processing fee should be as specified in 15A NCAC 2H.0205(c)(5).)
6. Specify how these residuals will be distributed: sold or given away in bags or other containers; lawn(bulk):
home garden (bulk): XX other._ See Section 1 of this pprrni t package
7. if the alternative for residual disposal consists of"surface disposal" as defined under 40 CFR Part 503,please complete the
application titled "SURFACE DISPOSAL OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS. Please identify if there is any storage of residuals in
a surface impoundment or disposal thru landfilling. Explain:
8. Is the residual process facility also the generator? XX Yes; No
9. Latitude: kl8 0°01 ' 0 0" Longitude: N 3 6°20 `0 0." of residual process facility
10. Specify whether the process facility is owned by:
federal: private; state;_j_XL local government;
11. County where facility is located: Rockingham
•
•
lI. PERMIT INFORMATION: '
1. Application No. (will be completed by DELI):
2. Specify whether project is: XX new; renewal'; modification
For renewals, complete all sections included in the application. Engineering Signature and Seal not required for
renewals or if there is not any construction involved with the subject project_
3. If this application is being submitted as a result of a renewal or modification to an existing permit_ list the existing permit
number
and its issue date
FORM: DORS 06/94 Pace 1 of 7 •

III. FACILITY LNFORMATION (attach additional pages for additional sources of residuals):
r ;ideals arc generated or prepared: Town of Madison WTP
2. Facility permit number: NCO 085626 ;facility permit bolder: Town of Madison
3. Specify whether facility in Section III.] is owned by: federal; private; state; XX local government;
4. Specify facility design flow: 1 ' S mgd; facility average daily flow: 0 . 6 mgd;
Type of residual storage: Drying Basins •
Volume of residual storage: 6 0 0 , 000 gal
•
Length of residuals storage at facility: 365 days (the Division requires a minimum 30 days storage in units that
are separate from treatment system, i.e.not in clarifiers,aeration basins,etc.);
Estimated volume of residuals: 100 (dry tons/yr.);
5. If the residual process facility is not the same as the generator,please specify delivery frequency and quantity of residual to
be processed:
6. Facility contact(person familiar with residuals preparation): Mike Morrison ,
7. Facility contact's telephone number: ( 3 3 6 ) 4 2 7—3 9 71
8. Location of treatment facility: NC State; Rockingham County
9. Mailing address: Same as nermittee
10. Specify the source of the residuals:XX treatment of water (alum sludges); treatment of industrial wastewater
(100' industrial residuals); treatment of industrial wastewater mixed with domestic wastewater (please specify
appropriate percentages of %industrial wastewater, %domestic wastewater);
other (explain):
Attach an explanation of either the treatment process, manufacturing process, or bow the waste is generated. Provide full
and complete details of the entire process.
11. Docs the facility which generates the residuals have an approved pretreatment program? Yes; XX No.
Tbis includes facilities which are classified as a"Class I"facility (any publicly owned treatment works required, under 40
CFR 403.8, to have an approved pretreatment program or any facility treating domestic sewage that is classified as"Class
1" the appropriate federal or State authority)
IV. RESIDUALS INFORMATION (attach additional pages for additional sources of residuals):
1. Information for Hazardous Waste (RCRA)Determination. The information requested on the limitations specified below
pertain only to those residuals that are generated from a municipal wastewater treatment facility with industrial contribution
or active pretreatment program and from any other treatment facility with wastewater sources that include industrial sources.
a. Are any of the residuals covered by this application listed in 40 CFR 261.31-261.33? Yes; XX No. If Yes,
list the number(s):
b. Do the residuals exhibit any of the four characteristics defined by 40 CFR 261.21-261.24? Yes; XX No.
Attach laboratory results for the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure Analyses, Reactivity, Ignitability. and
Corrosivity for each residual.
FORM: DORS 06/94 • Page 2 of 7

Note: If the following constituent levels(as determined by the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure Analyses)arc
exceeded in the residuals or if the pH of the residual is not within the ranee listed below, the residual is b)
definition a Hazardous waste. Chemical analyses must be made to Minimum Detection Levels.
EEM PPM
Arsenic 5.0 Barium 100.0
Benzene 0.5 Cadmium 1.0
Carbon tetrachloride 0.5 Chlordane 0.03
Chlorobenzene 100.0 Chloroform 6.0
Chromium 5.0 o-Cresol 200.0
m-Cresol 200.0 p-Cresol 200.0
Cresol 200.0 2,4-D 10.0
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 7.5 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.5 •
1,1-Dichloroethylene 0.7 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.13
Endrin 0.02 Heptachlor(and its hydroxide) 0.008 _
Hexachlorobenzene 0.13 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene 0.5
Hexachloroethane 3.0 Lead 5.0
Lindane 0.4 Mercury 0.2
Metboxychlor 10.0 Methyl ethyl ketone 200.0 ,
Nitrobenzene 2.0 Pentachlorophenol 100.0
Pyridine 5.0 Selenium 1.0
Silver 5.0 Tetrachloroethylene 0.7
Toxaphcne • 0.5 Trichloroethylene • 0.5
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 400.0 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 2.0
2,4,5-TP (Silvex) 1.0 Vinyl chloride 0.2
pH (2:1 vol./wt.): >2.0 s.u. - <12.5 s.u.
NOTE: IF ANY OF THE RESIDUALS MEET THE DEFINITIONS OF A HAZARDOUS WASTE,
AS NOTED IN EITHER "A" OR "B" ABOVE, A PERMIT CANNOT BE ISSUED FOR
THAT MATERIAL AND IT SHOULD NOT BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THIS
APPLICATION.
2. For each residual,please attach a complete chemical analysis of the material. This analysis must be comprehensive enough
to completely characterize the residual and must be based upon a review of the process that generates the material. If the
facility that will generate the residual is not yet in operation, the characterization must be based on similar existing
facilities and projection based on the type of facility. The analysis must include a minimum of the following parameters
and any other known and suspected contaminants that are tributary to the system.
Cadmium Aluminum pH
Copper Ammonia-Nitrogen Phosphorus
Lead Calcium Potassium
Nickel Magnesium Sodium
Zinc Nitrate-Nitrite Nitrogen TKN
%Total Solids Plant Available Nitrogen(by calculation)
3. Wastewater residuals can not be sold or given away if the concentration of any pollutant in the residuals exceeds the ceiling
concentrations specified in the table below. Specify the pollutant concentration of these residuals(attach lab analysis):
Pollutant Pollutant Ceiling Concentration (mg/kg) Pollutant Concentration(mg/kg)
Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis
Cadmium 85 i.9 3
Copper 4300 • - . _ 25 . 09
Lead 840 • 21 . 23
Nickel 420 10 . 04
Zinc 7500 80 . 67
•
-ORM: DORS 06/94 Page 3 of 7

4 Provide, all applicable pilot studies and any bench scale tests performed on each residual source and the results, includin,
the approximate fertilizer equivalent.
5. Wastewater residuals can't be sold or given away in bags or other containers for application to the land unless one of the
•
following options is satisfied.
A Specify either A or B. Please be advised, if the residuals are to be sold or given away in bulk for application tc
lawn or home garden then Option A is the only option.
A . The pollutant concentration of the residuals must be less than Pollutant Monthly Average Concentrations
listed in the table below.
Monthly Average Concentrations Pollutant Concentration
Pollutant Dry WeiEht Basis (mg/kg) Dry Weight Basis (mg/kg)
Cadmium 39 1 . 9 3
Copper 1500 25 . 04
Lead 300 21 . 23
Nickel 420 10 . 04
Zinc 2800 80 . 67
B. The product of the concentration of each pollutant in the residual and the annual.whole residual application
rate for the residual shall not cause the Annual Pollutant Loading Rate to be exceeded.
In order for the Annual Whole Residual Application Rate (AWRAR) to be calculated the Annual Pollutant
Loading Rate (APLR) is divided by the pollutant concentration (PC) times 0.001 (a conversion factor) as
follows: •
AWRAR= APLR
PC ' 0.001
Pollutant Annual Pollutant Annual Whole Residual
Pollutant Concentration Loading Rates Application Rate
Dry Weight Basis • (APLR) (AWRAR)
(mg/kg) kg/hectare )4,/hectare
Cadmium 1 .9
Copper 75
Lead 15
Nickel 21
Zinc 140
The AWRAR for the residual is the lowest AWRAR calculated. This is the maximum rate at which the
subject residual can be applied (to convert kg/bectare to lbs/acre multiply-by 0.8924). Please specify
ke/bectare or lbs/acre:
AWRAR=
V . PATHOGEN REDUCTION INFORMATION (attach add. pages for additional sources of residuals)
In accordance with 1SA NCAC 2H .0200, pathogen reduction can be achieved using either 40 CFR Part 257 or 40 CFR Part
503. Since the pathogen reduction requirements found in 40 CFR Part 257 (note, "Processes to Further Reduce Pathogens"or
PFRP) are incorporated into 40 CFR Pan 503, only Part 503 is listed below. Please check which of the following applies to
the subject residual:
•
FORM: DORS 06/94 Page 4 of 7

1. In order for the residuals to be Class A, in accordance with the pathogen requirements in 40 CFR 503.32(a),either Part a or
Part b and one of the options in Part c must be completed (please submit all lab analysis,test results and calculations):
XX a. A Fecal coliform density less than 1000 Most Probable Number per gram of total dry solids,or
b. A Salmonella sp. density less than 3 Most Probable Number per 4 grams of total dry solids.
3 c. In addition to Part a or Part b being met,one of the following alternatives must also be completed. Please
specify 1, 2, 3, 4, 5a, 5b, Sc, 5d, Se, 5f, 5g or 6 below being met:
1. Lime/temp erature - an increased residuals temperature should be maintained fur a pres7ibed period of time, in
accordance with the following guidelines. The results(D) shall be the amount of time, in days, that the residuals
shall remain at the given temperature:
•
Time and Temperature Guidelines •
Total Solids Temperature (t) Minimum Time Equation Notts •
No beating of small
> or=7% > or=50°C >or= 20 minutes D= 131.700.000 particles by warmed
100.14 t gases or immiscible
liquid.
> or=7% > or= 50°C >or= 15 seconds D= 131.700.000 Small particles heated by
100.14 t warmed gases or
immiscible liquid.
< 7% > or= 50°C >or= 15 seconds D=131.700.Q00
to 100.14 t
< 30 minutes
< 7% >or= 500 C >or= 30 minutes D= 50.070.00Q
100.14 t
2. alkaline treatment- the pH of the residuals is raised to greater than 12 for at least 72 hours. During this time, the
temperature of the residuals should be greater than 52°C for at least 12 hours. In addition, after the 72 hour
period,the residuals are to be air dried to at least 50%total solids.
3. prior testins for Enteric VirusNjble Helminth Ova-the residuals are analyzed for the presence of enteric viruses
(Plaque-forming units) (pfu]and viable belminth ova. If the residuals are analyzed before the pathogen reduction
process and found to have densities of enteric virus <1 pfu/4 grams of total solids and viable belminth dva<1/4g
total solids, the residuals are Class A with respect to enteric virus and viable belminth ova until the next
monitoring episode. If the residuals are analyzed before the pathogen reduction process and found to have densities
of enteric virus> or= 1 pfu/4 g total solids or viable belminth ova>or= 1/4 g total solids, and tested again after
processing and found to meet the enteric virus and viable belminth ova levels listed under"4" below, then the
processed residuals will be Class A with respect to enteric viruses and viable belminth ova when the operating
parameters for the pathogen reduction process are monitored and shown to he consistent with the values or ranges
of values documented.
4. po prior testing for.Enteric VirusNiable Helminth Ova-if the residuals are not analyzed before pathogen reduction
processing for enteric viruses and viable belminth ova,the density of enteric viruses must be less than 1 pfu/4 g of
total dry solids and the density of viable helminth ova must be less than 1/4 g of total dry solids,or the residuals
must be treated by a"Process to Further Reduce Pathogens"or a"Process to Further Reduce Pathogens"equivalent
process.
5. The"Processes to Further Reduce Pathogens"(PFRP)are described as follows:
a. Comnostini- using either the within-vessel or static aerated pile composting methods, the temperature of the
residuals are raised to 55°C or higher for three days. Using the windrow composting method,the residuals are
raised to 55°C or higher for fifteen days. During the high temperature period, there will be a minimum of five
turnings of the windrow.
FORM: DORS 06/94 Page 5 of 7

b. }lcat Drvin; - residuals are dried by direct or indirect contact with bot gases to reduce the moisture content o
the residuals to 10%or lower. Either the temperature of the gas in contact with the residuals exceeds 80°C o
h::lh temperature of the gas in contact with the residuals. when the residuals leave the.dryer. exceed
80° C.
c. Cat Trcatrnent - liquid residuals are heated to a temperature of 1800 C or higher for thirty minutes.
d. T h;rrnophilic Aerohic Digestion -liquid residuals are agitated with air or oxygen to maintain aerobic condition,
at residence times of ten days at temperatures of 55°C to 60°C.
e. Fseta Ray Irradiation - residuals are irradiated with beta rays from an accelerator at dosages of at least 1.(
megarad at room temperature (ca.20°C).
f. gamma Ray Irradiation - residuals are irradiated with gamma rays from certain isotopes such as 60Co an
137C�,at dosages of at least 1.0 megarad at room temperature(ca. 20°C).
g. Pasteurization - the temperature of the residuals is maintained at 70°C or higher for at least thirty minutes.
6. The residuals shall be treated in a process that is equivalent to a"Processes to Further Reduce Pathogens" (PFRP).
as determined by the permitting authority based on evaluations of the recommendations provided by the Pathogen
Equivalency Committee.
V I. GENERAL INFORMATION:
I. Please provide a brief narrative concerning materials handling.including the following:
a. How will the materials will be handled and transported from where the residuals were produced to where it will be
treated?
b. Where will the residuals be stored until processed?
c. How will leachate collection be handled?
d. What will be the duration of treatment?
e. Where will the final product be stored?
f. How long will the final product be stored before being distributed?
g. How will the final product he distributed(packaging)? •
2. Please attach a marketability statement detailing destinations and approximate amounts of the final product to be
discibuted.
3. Please provide either a label which shall be affixed to the bagged processed residual or an information sheet which shall be
provided to the person who receives the processed residual. The label or information sheet shall contain,at a minimum, the
following information: .
a The name and address of the person who prepared the residual that is sold or given away in a bag or other container for
application to the land.
b. A statement that application of the residual to the land is prohibited except in accordance with the instructions on the
label or information sheet.
c. A statement that the residuals shall not be applied to any site that is flooded, frozeta or snow-covered.. •
d A statement that adequate procedures shall be provided to prevent surface runoff from carrying any disposed or stored
residuals into any surface waters.
e. Information on all applicable buffers including a 10 foot buffer between application site and any public or private water
supply source (including wells)and any stream,lake,river,or natural drainage way.
f. The Annual Whole Residual Application Rate(AWRAR)for the residual that does not cause any of the annual
pollutant loading rates to be exceeded(if necessary).
•
FORM: DORS 06/94 Pa�:c 6 of 7

same and Complete Address of Engineering Firm:
Litt': State: Zip:
elephone Number: ( )
Professional Engineer's Certification:
. attest that this application for
is been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I further attest that to the best of my knowledge
, e proposed design has been prepared in accordance with the applicable regulations. Although certain portions of this submittal
package may have been developed by other professionals,inclusion of these materials under my signature and seal signifies that I have
viewed this material and have judged it to be consistent with the proposed design.
north Carolina Professional Engineer's Seal, Signature,and Date:
•
pplicant's Certification:
Mike Morrison . attest that this application for
Town of Madison WTP __
s been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
...placation are not completed and that if all required supponing infornation.m d attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned to me as incomplete.
gnature _ Date
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE. INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING; INFORMATION AND
MATERIALS, SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY SECTION •
PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT
POST OFFICE BOX 29535 •
' RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: (919) 733-5083
•
)RM: DORS Wb 94 P.:_c 7 of 7

Precision Land Application, Inc.
Biosolids Analysis Report
Project: Town of Madison WTP Sample Date: April 27, 2000
%Solids: 51 Type of Sample Taken: Grab pH: 5.36
Conversion Table
Parameter Mg/Kg X 0.002 = lbs/dry ton
Nitrogen TKN 1,240.00 2.48
Ammonia N 128.00 0.26
Nitrate N 4.00 0.0080
Phosphorus 524.00 1.05
Ceiling Concentration
Mg/Kg
Arsenic 7.72 OK 75.00 0.0154
Cadmium 1.93 OK 85.00 0.0039
Chromium 54.424 0.108848
Copper 25.09 OK 4300.00 0.0502
Lead 21.23 OK 840.00 0.0425
Mercury 0.20 OK 57.00 0.0004
Molybdenum 1.93 OK 75.00 0.0039
Nickel 10.04 OK 420.00 0.0201
Selenium 2.70 OK 100.00 0.0054
Zinc 80.67 OK 7500.00 0.1613
Aluminum 47.09 0.0942
Calcium 961.09 1.92
Chlorides 0.0000
Iron 0.0000
Magnesium 2,860.12 5.72
Manganese 0.0000
Potassium 2,350.00 4.70
Sodium 19.30 0.04
Sulfur 0.00
Plant Available Nitrogen (PAN)
Mineralization Rate: 0.4 Unstabilized Primary&Secondary Residuals 0.4
Aerobically Digested Residuals 0.3
Anaerobically Digested Residuals 0.2
Composted Residuals 0.1
[(MR x (TKN -AmN))+ (.5 x AmN) + NO3N] x .002 = lbs. PAN/dry ton
Surface 512.80 Mg/Kg 1.03 lbs PAN/dry ton
[(MR x(TKN -AmN))+AmN + NO3N] x .002 = lbs. PAN/dry ton
Injection 576.80 Mg/Kg 1.15 lbs PAN/dry ton

Precision Land Application, Inc.
Biosolids Information Sheet
Nutrients Provided at 50 Yards / Acre
Project: Town of Madison WTP
21.48 Dry tons/Acre pH: 5.36 Sample Date: April 27, 2000
lbs.I acre
Parameter applied
Nitrogen (PAN) 22.03
Phosphorus (P) 22.51
Potassium (K) 100.94
Sulfur 0.000
Calcium 41.284
Magnesium 122.857
Copper 1.078
Zinc 3.465
Cadmium 0.083
Nickel 0.431
Lead 0.912
Biosolid Value
Unit cost I lb* $/acre
Nitrogen (N) $0.17 $3.79
Phosphate (P) $0.17 $3.87
Potash (K) $0.17 $17.36
•Costs based on 17-17-17 purchased by the ton and spread by Southern States,Inc.
$211.00 per ton,of which$35.00 was spreading cost. Cost dated:June 1999
Spreading Cost per acre: $5.30
Total value per acre: $30.32
-Application of this residual is prohibited except in accordance with the instructions on this information sheet.
-These residuals shall not be applied to any site that is flooded,frozen or snow-covered.
-Residuals shall not be applied to any site that has a slope in excess of 10%
-Adequate provisions shall be taken to prevent surface runoff from carrying any residuals into surface waters.
-The application site shall maintain a minimum of a 10 foot buffer between the application area and any public or
private water supply source(including wells)and any stream,lake,river,or natural dranage way.
This residual was produced by:
Town of Madison •
120 N. Market St.
Madison, NC 27025
[phone]

A Note Concerning Sampling
Most of the sampling for this permit application was conducted in 2000. However, some
sampling, specifically the testing for Helminth Ova and Enteric Viruses was conducted in
1998 when the town was first looking into the possibility of seeking a permit for this
residual. Since no sludge has been disposed of during the past 15 years, and only one
small amount of sludge (approximately 13% of the total volume)was added to this drying
basin since 1998. The town feels that the test for Helminth Ova and Enteric Viruses is
still representative of the residuals stored in this drying basin.

; .7.7ria, SPECIALIZED
.Ml.
l 1-1.1.11,
"...."...r.d..
ASSAYS, INC.
Mir yAilrI 2960 Foster Creighton Dr. loCNi NI A141111._.,-Y-V I. At_ Fla I C3 Ft -1-
llik y m
le P.O. Box 40566
mi 111.1 Nashville, TN 37204-0566
Phone [phone] ..
4;7 1 Lab Numb e T'- 00-14 5704
C 1-1R I S AL E.-.A r•IDE F.: 5 mp 1 e ID• N 0 1
C.Z. -..,HITI-: PLA,71IW..5 RaclD Sample Type: Sulid waste
3ARING RIVER :',.':.-.. 28669 Site 10:
Collected 4,27/00
iTu Collected : 12. ::30
1."'-1 SUN :AA T17.6 H L.A N'r t.:-.1 t e ti e c e 1',..•,'.a CI : 4-/ 13/00
1 e T' . ,.). ALE: Ais4DEF Tr tl. F?.-.3:7.:e i:,./e 11 • 9• 00
rei,ficst Quail 811
,Indlte resoit. Liu t S I.th t Lint F-dct.;.,r Date T Die ;pal ys1: net.WA
.._._............_....._....__ .._ . ........_.._
f11111.7ix
klun i atni gi/889 6 nyely 19 299 9.81 1 5/ 9/00 ?:17 E. kelley 60100 1864
•it•sen ie ,' 1') r1111,:g 1.930 0 ?8,1 1 5/ MO 7:17 g. MEllefi 601013 1864
ayll.:1 3. 930 0.984 3. 51 9/00 711 R. Kelley 60108 1864
ale ism F.61 i192 tip*1- 19 '279 9.813 1 51 9100 7:11 R. Kiley 60100 1861
T:b.rilti!UN 51.424 4111.1 1.930 0.984 1 If 9/00 7•1.7 E. Kelley 60100 1864
25.088 11 yi k I 1..93ii 0 984 1 5/ F/00 1:1.': r Kel1eg 6016f3
Lel d 21.2'1? rqiltg 1.5i0 1 70 1 51 9/00 7.17 r. 011e y 601313 1. Y
.!:3..
[141.41VI1 2860.12 vtsikfi 15 "?.99 'i.84i 1 5/ 9/20 7:I.7 R. Kelleq 601.136 1864
rlerefir I eD 1.19/kg 0.196 0.100 1 5/ 2/00 721 G.nccord 7471 7685
ilol ybdentm qi) rNiki I.930 O.9-c34 1 5/ 9/00 7:17 r Kelley 60100 1864
'1.14:el 10.035 ny.1,:q 1.930 9 984 I 5/ 9/00 7:17 g. Kelley 601.0i5 1864
oetai.F.i,A; 23-50 nlik 1 l'i 3 9.f.i4 I 11 9180 ?:if E Ki-11,...1 60108 186a
tigiky I..9 Ai 0.984 1 5/ 9100 71 l';' f! Kelley aV1V Vb4
Ad ititt HD ttlikq 19 299 ?.1313 1 5/ 9/00 7.17, R Kelley 60100 1.,..1- 4
'inc A.671 rtVlol 13.299 9 1313 1 5/ 9/01 7:17 R. Kf41ey 60100 lW
r•,VE RENAL C44E331py ppgArwl Fro;
'• DI g 3,3eajnt 5.1 3'. l 57 2/00 F.,16 J &Aden CLP '17.t
Ff,act A,.efe Cg a Tli it ND tig/i;g ,:.D 2.0 1 5/ 4/00 11:00 Hai.fic astl e SM-846 '7708
;,:i.act I ge : 11F I 4 e HD rig,:is 20.0 70.0 3 5/ 1/00 11:00 Hallcastle S11-846 '0013
1,Jri-osi ,ty MDT CUr1ill,S1Vil 4/30/110 11:53 , .Tee 1110 ,381311
iqnit-d!Jil 087 nt..!ITABLI. Or ID 2811} 1/313/00 17.10 J.-1.,?,'FA'• Uipil
oq tr tte-N ds ii OP riell it 1 !... 0.1 11 1/28/00 19: J•;j V.
4 tr iti-N as ;.! 1 00 i Rit fi 1.08 1.CX Ill 4/28/00 19:00 V,.K.:..!:!4el3 9056 .T205
;?-rtioni a Witriqen ds N 128. ft glk g 1.0 I.C. I 5/ 3/00 8:15 ;.0 ail ar ril S314500 13.21,
"tiosrinvits as. P 571. tig/kg 3..8 1 0 1 5/ 3/00 IF:50 Iii010a5t1e 365.2 1.1 q357
V jell ta til Hi t rr.k gen as 8 1210 tigikii 1 00 1 00 1 5/ 3i80 -11./5 irardcastle St145004t '7`;50
t:J..P tie,30..rs
ratisix Spike
knaltte fiat Units Rey 1 f•ti.t. Reeevery A:i.) Pate Tine Real ys t flethed RI: ,c'avch
ample ;•441.1rt Linsti nued . .
COPY 2
orpa.-....• . ... . .... . ..

SPECIALIZED
St 4 el 1 MI 4011111
li 11 ril 1 1.6 1"1" ASSAYS INC.
am a._ 'IL= 9
IIIW Nwri. ;;
. .. .. 2960 Foster Creighton Dr.
\ y NI P.O. Box 40566
Nashville, TN 37204-0566 I
uL.!..e.i•AiammiibIAPPAI
---- Phone [phone]
Lab or t!ar y Numb er : CI:,0--An770-1
Sample ID: M 01
F i-i ci k2 2
14.1P Results
Matr;1.
0:421.1te R'nult Uni":s Reg Lioit Re0,10,flA ("/:) Date {Ale Atialgit Metia0d QC att,.Iti
. _
0.100 44/1 1.0 102 51 8100 742 G.Minson 40100 438
.!;arisJo f i.00 n411 100 81 51 8100 . :42 6.60bivon 60100 438
1:-Ldliuo * 0.110 4,121 1 0 qi 51 B100 7:42 T:i.Wiii151111 60100 438
Airatiut f 5.500 o4/1 5 0 11 51 4100 ',':4,' G.Reeinsa 601130 liF
4 'DI; f1/1 5.0 96 5: 8100 7:42 g.8iiliOft 60100 438
01.1.70.:1 1.01.:10 oV1 1.20 78 5/ 2100 :':36 ',McCord 7479A 777q
.t;elen!u4 : 0.106 tii/1 1.0 106 51 8100 7:42 &.Robinson 60100 438
v..IlveT < 0.100 mill .0 87 1/ aiuu :'.42 f; Cninion 60100 1i'6
7:Klee. < 0.050 1:,;i'1 0.5 130 51 6/00 0 44 1: 4erfor4 8260 2478
Carbon tetrach1dride .: 0 Pla oyi 0.5 78 5/ 6100 9 q6 r.i.0erfwd 8260 7478
.:h1orunenzene f 10.0 0411 100 12'1 51 6100 8:46 U.Herfard $260 2471
vllor0forn -' 0.060 o411 6 6 133 5/ 6100 8:46 0.Herfor4 CO zvo
z,-i.-1):60.droielline < 0.,y51 riqii o.5 131. 51 6100 8:46 0.Herfor1 8760 2498
1,1-Diinlernene .,:. 0.Jr0 olfq rj‘i, 172 5! 6100 8.46 3 Herford C260 2476
Met441eth4MAone :. 20.0 og-1 290 186 5/ 6/00 8:44 0.Herford 8260 2478
Tetra0.oroeslwae f 0.0M ol/1 01 137 51 6/00 8:46 O.Heri,ord 8260 2478
Trichloroethe,K, :: 0.00 04/1 0.5 114 5/ 6100 8:46 B.Herford 8260 2496
liD41 Chloride <. 0.020 0411 C. 121 51 6/00 8:46 B.Herford 8260 2478
1.010 n411 200 42 5.: 4/00 13:04 d.ifiqua 8210
1,4-Dichluc.benzene < uma olil 7.5 38 51 4/00 13:04 J.Iiiva 6270 315
2.1-Dinitrotoluene f. 0.013 q11. 13.13 SF 5/ 4100 13:01 J.100:i 8270 AS
icxachlorobeftzene ; 0.917 44/1 U.13 30 51 4/00 13.04 J.Fuqua8270 11S
0exch1or-1,3-lautadien : 0.010 o411 0.5 38 51 4/00 13:04 ii.fugua 8270 31:,;
4exacialoroethine < 0.010 og/1. 3.0 36 5/ 4100 1304 J ruilua 8370 31.5
Aitrellenzene .• 4.010 4411 2 0 qt. 5/ 4100 13-04 J Fulua 0370 :315
?entuhlmenencd f 0.01:; o4/1 110 .-,f, 'V 4/00 13.04 J.Fqqoa MO 317:
Pgridin i. iliTE 11/1 5.1 32 51 4/00 1 .04 J.Fugua 8270 31n
Z,4,5-Trichloropherel f 0.110 n411 400 54 51 4100 13:04 J.Fcqua 8270 115
?„4,6-1J.ichl1rophowl < 1.010 4411 2.0 50 51 4/00 13:04 J.riolua 8270 315
(Agit:4.We < 0 13100 nga 0.030 99 1/11100 16:12 R. Mat 8081A 50U
. 4...6, < 1 00 og1i. 10.0 127 5110/00 15:30 R Hunt 8151A 2634
Y:cArin i. 0.0020 0411 0.02 119 5111/00 16:12 R. Hunt 8081A 500
'0;aptachlar < u.oaos WI 0 008 78 5/11100 14:12 C. Hunt 8081A .i30
inglatte ,:. 0.0400 ogll 0.4 122 Y11/08 14:12 R. Hunt 8081A 500
Methax4ahlo4 f 1.000 0a/1 10.0 184 5/11/00 16:12 R. Huat 8081A 503
COM119,?i* 'f. O.0:50 mil 0.50 1?.9 5111/00 16:12 R. Haw 8081A 500
. 1vex f. 0.100 44/1 1,0 137 5/10/00 15:38 R Hunt 81518 2634
deptachior eoxide < 0.0009 00. 0.008 121 5/11100 16:12 R. R0nt. 8081A 500
N.P ExtricU.an Initiated 4128/00 16:00 C Bates 1311 7274
Zero 8eadspaze Extracti0n Initiated 4128100 16:00 C.84tes 1311 7271
Simple revrt auntinued
COPY 2
•

SPECIALIZED
■s '" l"auus ASSAYS INC.
SI II"' 1111
*:i :: 2960 Foster Creighton Dr.
P.O. Box 40566 A N A L Y T t C. A li_ FZ 1E F' CI F?-1
----+� Ara Nashville, TN 37204-0566
s r' '' Phone [phone]
LaS,::rattar4 Number 00—R'79Q4
6.:7:i:ple ID' P1 01
i e 3
rf:u1 R,ui.ti.
tl:itrix .ke
Reiur 119Lt5 Keg titW: ri'3,'overq CZ) gate 7ttie ;tliifis. RFtkod a4 Eit'i 1
"P, ., itot det:tted at the report 'init.
►':.trl 1.10kt'r rrc:oar.i'y For analgtes :•Fpc'rttd •-ron itatct, Rf
t m follait5 hetisOd .311, N-845 F.t•'rl>i m
repsrted t0 the nea,est 1ii eeq +
,;;`rrL;,ate 7 Ket:OArij Tarcet Ri e
'lJfi Sorrel+ate, ?. `-Diehloroethartw,, d4 60. • 13.13
1.r1l Surrtlate, Toluene d0 76. 90. - 1:3.
':t?A atrrogate, 1-c(rnttaF:1tqt c t,enzerre 103. 73. 171.
.ur--14.it'rot:erl ne-d: 70. :`_; - 105.
stir•'-,.-r,.uurr<Giphe6g1 ,11 :, -• 119.
.;rr-tt ;'L-c JJ. 04 $0. 10. - 116.
:rr- ;e:el dS `siJ, 10. - !00.
= uaraN)1?nal ;:8. `+ - 100.
, -11.kSrorso shekel 72 1; 134
r'c.t Stt?,r...i1•rx 7!J. - 172.
.-,rr-O.i tttllt.tr.lf)rt.i; 1E! - 170
70. -- 130.
•
RY. r:et.ti •3P.+l tiP3dl;tti r"$uIr'i have been 1; 1 rQe.t.e i t%N ,tt tt eEtf�ill:.
•
•
:erpie reircrt .oat:nue(4 .
COPY 2
7Fr. •• .

Torn SPECIALIZED
W;; ;°Tam' ASSAYS, INC.
..W .r ...._.
':' • �� :i 2960 Foster Creighton Dr.
I // :: P.O. Box 40566 ,ci MI A L_Y T I AIL FR P C3 Ft -7-
� 6.�: ! Nashville, TN 37204-0566
---- Phone [phone]
Lab oraf tor t Number.: cO--A579O4
5 ;lpie it): N 0l.
Faye 4
The S, only to the items tested.
1•�'f'. .. r t sha : 1 1,ot he •ep oduced except in 'Fill I. ar,i .iiis.h
p,srmission of the iabovat.Jt' .
Rtppoi'I !2.pp;'o,,:-d By: 1 �._._---- Report. Date: 5./11iOO
Iheocior:lk J. Dkiello, Ph. D. , Technical Ser., Paul E. Lane, .Jr. , Lab Director
Michael H. rp_inr, 11. S. , Technical Director Glenn L. Horton. Technical. Serv.
Johnnt, A rlii.chel1, Dlr. Serv. Kalil, S. Ruppel: Technical Sere
ri' Smith, :4ss.i t3nt Tech i.i d1. 171.rect'..r t6!if la t- Technic.E,1
Gall A rage, Serv.
Laboratory Certification Number. 387
Lri'i of Sample Repurt.
COPY 2

SPECIALIZED -
..., ..u11....0 ASSAYS, INC. ;_r, ,
...1 11.1 1.L---•
;:sew Iiiir"vms.=
' Si''''', :: 2960 Foster Creighton Dr. LIi-iRiS Ai-.r.XAN. 7:r-
a'.. / 1I P.O. Box 40566 =!-1;JP. UNITE F1.AI'J!= `^;O`D
;1 .. 1.:., : Nashville, TN 37204-0566 c: { �,
"16.2 `' "''4' Phone [phone] �J �'J' RIVER,V=i:', i;=. c 0.. _�
w
1
CHAIN OF CUSTODY z0 1-3
O
5 rJ rr
-.ter.:p nJp c-_ . SlUilir: ,blJ w•']'• 11 rn�a:`rc:: :,e7.uZ S.?.3
; James Alexander i ; z i i ii
;t--, ' z . rt iEn i I ; I 1
'0)ECi' +bg• ',AE gutq : i ; I-.. i I- .O -3
Madison Water Plant '- ; rt 1 O ;N i7 ; i e i t it '
--sly !,io. -;al;j •...?, _, ! .'ate I Tit:1: I"aulx I brat i lC p i ?^t`iB5 t4 1 0 i (I) la CJ'i 'I•'• i p 1 !
i I i I ' ' (D 1 •
• i
{ : 1 I .� 1 I •
'
1 i 1
1 i i i :X I X 'X IX 'X X •X :X IX I
1a•31 x ; 2 : ;
MO1 000427 i i ,
I
-A57904 ; 1 .
i ; ' >• . '(� 1 O ' CA n n `'X
i ; I a ; i ,
•
X IX X X iX X +X 'X X
i ' 3 3 i 1 i
•
X :X X i � �i
1 I i ; 1 i i
1 1 I i
i i
.
1 1 ,
•
1 i 1 i3 3 3 3I
•
! I 1
I j i i ,
1
i
1 I
:n; St r 1 ri -7C ii`.qQ ;1 : VT ' -Cii.. ..,, �:Ip:. `;� 1 Oil i `?ze':.' a tv: I r1;-
r 000427 , 1 I 1
1
tseander /coc -•
i
:7,'..... sJ •_ - ...'.!'g. Jt.. ' ''{ I 33F i;nn ',ii .:. 1).: PT =lCti ...V: . JJ 1
.rr.^r r lr .9 .I4,;n Ae-- 1. :. _C7 !, i T',v.. 1Ui'•7.
• •
a orat ry . r A „er: I$99a5
•
C....r Sc:i; ;n1...!
i
•
COPY 1

)222 D. Fecal coliform membrane filter procedure :
defer to Table 9222 : III suggested Sample volumes for membrane filter
fecal coliform test :
dater source: range from lakes, reservoirs, wells, sewage treatment plants
to raw municipal sewage , Water supply intake.
Phis covers a wide range just to name a few.
Iolume amounts range from 100 mls to 0 . 001 mls .
The attached sheets are the results of fecal coliform test ran on Alum Sludge .
If you have any questions call me at Madison wastewater r . est7e:t
336-427-0520
Thank You
Theresa D.
Cox
Page 1

Membrane Filter Technique
Fecal Coliform Procedure
Reference: Standard Methods 18Th. EditionMethod 9222 D.
Phosphate Buffer Solution:
Prepare using Hach prepackaged pillows, mixed by mfg. recommendations. Sterilize solution daily
in autoclavable squeeze bottles.
Media Preparation:
1. The preferred media source is 2.0 ml premixed M-FC broth ampoules. These ampoules are to
be stored and used according to the mfg. recommendations, and to be used prior to the expiation date.
2. The backup media is powdered bulk media, mixed according to mfg recommendation and used
within 96 hours.
Sample Bottle Preparation:
1. Make up a 10%sodium thiosulfate solution.
2. Add I ml of sodium thiosulfate solution to each sample bottle, cap loosely
3. Autoclave bottles.
Autoclave Equipment:
1. Place the following equipment in autoclave:
a 5& 10 m1 pipettes
b. 100 ml graduated cylinder
c. filter funnel assembly
d. Phosphate Buffer solution,in autoclaveable squeeze bottles
e. Sample bottles, containing 1 ml sodium thiosulfate each
2. Autoclave at 121°C for 15 minutes
3. Record all information on Autoclave Log
Test Procedures:
1. Set up small beaker containing methyl alcohol and burner to flame forceps.
2. Set out a minimum of S petri dishes(blank prior, blank after, duplicate, and 2 dilutions)Mark
lids to indicate sample volumes.
3. Place pre sterilized filter pad in each petri dish.
4. Add 2 ml M-FC broth to each dish. (pour off excess broth)
5. Using flamed forceps, place presterilized filer on filter assembly base. Attach funnel to base and
rinse funnel with 20m1 buffer solution to wet filter, apply vacuum until water is filtered, remove vacuum.
Add 100m1 buffer solution(or sample volume)apply vacuum. Then rinse three times with 20 ml buffer
solution( rinsing funnel walls thourghly)remove from vacuum between rinses. Flame forceps and remove
filter from base. Apply filter to appropriate petri dish pad, making sure to eliminate all air trapped between
filter and pad. Flame forceps and repeat for all samples and blank after.
6. Sample volumes less than 20 ml require 20 ml of dilution water to be applied to filter(vacuum
off)then sample volume to be added and vacuum added at that point.
7. Place dishes in ziploc bag, removing all air possible.
8. Invert dishes and submerge completely in waterbath for 24 +2.0 hours.
Incubating and Counting:
1. Remove bag from waterbath. Count colonies within 20 minutes.
2. Remove petri dish lids and count colonies under microscope at lOx magnification.
3. Count all blue colonies.
4. Proper dilution should result in counts of 20-60 fecal colonies per filter.
Calculations:
Only use filter counts between 20 and 60:
Total#colonies(x) 100
Total ml of sample
Report as colonies per 100m1
All filter counts less than 20 report as<(result)per 100m1
All filter counts above 60 report as>(result)per 100m1

MEMBRANE FILTER
Sample by: Mal Analysis by: 4 Read by: 0-7")
Date : t/-a '-60 Time In: a:30 l'own Date: W-99-00
Day: F i r♦a Sample Temp: d U •c Day: ia4urd�
�,�
Time: /.'/ 'A Cl2 Residual: _j ugr�eu9/L Time Read: ja()Q
Sample ml Sample Count Sample ml Sample Count Reported
6-1-1e < /00 17u4 . 0 5ampie.5 a?6 ma5 0 Value
ip / / rmL 0 5,7.40.(p 3o.ncD n
5a.„pi., 2 a AL6 0 .5a.19)-7 56 "i 0 < 1.0
550 1,14'3 5 m!__ 0 , r`'ydo1r?, • 5o.v7A5 0
p L' /D , 'S 0 447nd B.hnK r Art,m»15 0
Sam le by: Analysis by: Read by:
Date : Time In: Date:
Day: Sample Temp: 'c Day:
Time: Cl2 Residual: _ ug/L Time Read:
Sample ml Sample Count Sample ml Sample Count Reported
Value
Sample by: Analysis by: Read by:
Date : Time In: Date:
Day: Sample Temp: 'C Day:
Time: Cl2 Residual: ug/L Time Read:
Sample location:Water Treatment plant
406 Lindsey Bridge Road
Madison, N.C. 27025
7 samples collected by Mike Morrison from Alum sludge,sludge bed# 1.

Innlvticnl
Services. lnc.
Client: Water Technology and Controls, Inc. Sample Date: February 2, 1998
Address: 642 Tamco Road Sample Received: February 5, 1998
Reidsville, NC 27320
Laboratory Analysis Report
Ii Sample Sample# Parameter Amount Analyzed Analyst Results
ID (wet weight) (wet weight)
Helminth Ova 50 gm PAJ <1 viable ova/50 gm total solids
020206 98036-019
Enteric Viruses 100 gm I PAJ I <1 PFU virus/100 •m total solids
PFU = Plaque Forming Unit MPN=Most Prooable Numoer
Methods Used under 40CFR Part503
Enteric Viruses: ASTM Method D 4994-89, Part A & B. 1989.
Helminth Ova: EPA. December. Control of Pathogens and Vector Attraction in Sewage Sluaae.
EPA Pub. 600/1-87/014 Office of Research and Development, Cincinnati, OH.
Project No.: 98036-019

03/08/2001 14:51 4274934 MADISON WWTP PAGE 01
•
IJ , I . issaLikamt
Kenneth Y.Hawkins ; �' - Sharon J.Darner
[e-mail]
lifigistAkbram T�»rt
Stew Boles Town of Madison Michael Cassidy
Carolyn Collins 120 N. Market Street
Ken Lankford [phone]
Jimmie Dalton Madison, North Carolina 27025 To uark Cl
Monte McIntosh [phone] • Fax: [phone] uohneonalibrary.repl.o Lannette Johnson
Philip Webster
rg
March 8, 2001
Chris Alexander
Precision Land Application
4022 White Plains Road
Roaring River, NC 28669
SUBJECT: Alum Sludge pH
Mr. Alexander
This letter is in response to your phone call on March 7, 2001.
A composite sample was drawn from the alum sludge storage area.
The resulting pH was 5.36 s.u.
If you have any further questions, please contact me at: 336-427-0520.
Sincerely,
Theresa D. Cox
Town of Madison TP Lab Manager
rr• Marvin(larder

North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources Alrdi
Division of Waste Management NcDENR
Michael F.Easley,Governor
William G. Ross Jr.,Secretary
William L.Meyer,Director
February 28, 2001
Mr. James C. Alexander
PLA, Inc
4022 White Plains Road
Roaring River, NC 28669
Re: Management of Residual From Town of Madison Water Treatment Plant. Rockingham
County
Dear Mr. Alexander:
This letter is in response to your letter dated January 22, 2001, requesting guidance
regarding the management of residual from the Town of Madison Water Treatment Plant. The
proposed methods of management would be conducted under a Division of Water Quality permit
and include: (1) the placement of the residual on the old Town of Madison landfill, (2) utilization of
the residual as a road fill material, and (3) utilization of the residual as a daily cover at the
Rockingham County Landfill.
The first proposal is to place the residual in areas of the cap on the Town of Madison landfill
where settlement and cracking have occurred. Non-hazardous solid waste management landfills,
permitted by the Solid Waste Section(Section) within the Division of Waste Management(Division),
must meet specific closure and post-closure requirements. The closure and post-closure
requirements for landfills vary considerably according to the date of closure, More recently closed
landfills must meet very specific closure and post-closure requirements. Any post-closure activity
at these permitted landfills must be reviewed and approved by the Solid Waste Section.
However, landfills which were never permitted by the Section and were closed as "open dumps" are
not subject to these requirements. A final cover of two foot of compacted soil and erosion control
measures by grading and seeding were typically the only closure requirements for these landfills.
The Town of Madison landfill was not permitted by the Section, therefore Section approval is not
required for post-closure uses. However, the Section strongly suggests that any post-closure uses be
conducted in such a manner that would not increase the potential for migration of contaminated
ground water from the landfill; including activities that would not adversely effect the final cover,
expose waste, or impound water over old disposal areas. Also, plans for post-closure uses should
avoid possibilities for the entrapment of methane gas. Even routine landfill gas monitoring within
structures and at the landfill boundary may not be sufficient to detect potentially dangerous
situations. It should be noted that if activities at the landfill result in the generation of solid waste,
the Section will have regulatory jurisdiction over the proper management of that waste.
1646 Mail Service Center, Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1646
Phone: 919—733-0692 \ FAX: [phone]\ Internet: www.enr.state.nc.us/
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY\AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER-50%RECYCLED/ 10%POST CONSUMER PAPER

Mr. Alexander
February 28, 2001
Page 2
The second proposal is to use the residual as road fill material under the Department of
Transportation highway construction projects. If DOT approves this use, the Division has no
objections and the reuse would not require Division approval.
The third proposal is to use the residual as daily cover at the Rockingham County Landfill.
Any proposal to utilize the residual as daily cover must be submitted by the landfill owner/operator
and approved by the Section. The municipal solid waste landfill regulations allow the Section to
approve the use of alternative daily cover if it can be demonstrated to be the equivalent to six inches
of soil.
The Inactive Hazardous Sites Branch, Superfund Section within the Division of Waste
Management is currently cataloging these old open dump sites and remedial action may be required
in the future. If remedial action is required, the landfill owner or operator, as well as any person who
conducted activities which resulted in the release of hazardous substances at the site or encouraged
the migration of hazardous substances previously disposed at the site, could be considered a
responsible party.
If there are any questions, please contact me @ [phone], extension 255.
Sincerely,
CCUjl7
ames C. Coffey, Head
Permitting Branch
Solid Waste Section
cc: Dexter Matthews
Phil Prete
Charlotte Jesneck
Hugh Jernigan

•
James A. Graham ortl Tarolina
Commissioner Dr.Richard C.Reich
pep Ir``ttmerrt of cAgrtrulturP Director
Vl inb onzumer $Erbice8
�grouomic lif2ision
MEMO
To: James C. Alexander, President
Precision Land Applications, Inc
4022 White Plains Road
Roaring River, NC 28669
Tucker Dr. M.Ray
From:
Subject: Aluminum in Water Plant Residuals
Date: November 15, 1999
Dear Mr. Alexander:
This is in reply to your letter requesting the feasibility of using waste water residuals that
contains aluminum for application on highway embankments and land fill caps. Aluminum is a
natural constituent in the structure of clay minerals. It exists in exchangeable and non-
exchangeable forms depending on soil pH. At pH levels below 5.5 (Al )+++ is considered
"exchangeable" and can be toxic to plants...depending on the amount that is "exchangeable".
Aluminum is the major source of soil acidity (Ac) in soils that contain clay minerals. The amount
of aluminum within a soil increases as clay content increases.
Soil reaction: AI+++ + water (H20) Al+++ (OH)3 + H+ (the acidic by-product).
The H+ ion is acidic, The OH- ion is basic. Water = H +OH
This potential for aluminum toxicity is controlled by maintaining the soil above pH 5.5.
Agricultural lime renders aluminum non-toxic by combining the aluminum (Al+++ ) ion with
hydroxyl ions (OH). to form a precipitate of gibbsite [ Al(OH)3 ]. The gibbsite is insoluble and
keeps aluminum in a "simi-bound" state ....thus being non-toxic to plants.
Consequently, I see no problem with applying waste water residuals that contains
aluminum...assuming the soil pH is properly adjusted (-6.0). In fact, the target pH for roadside
grass and other DOT plantings is p1-I 6.0. In some cases waste water treatment plants apply
slaked lime as part of their routine treatment. In such cases, this would neutralize any aluminum
in the sludge. In fact some waste water sludge actually have some liming capability due to lime
being added in the treatment process. Application of this material would require knowing it's
calcium carbonate equivalent (lime equivalent value) to prevent over liming on application sites.
4300 Reedy Creek Road,Raleigh,North Carolina 27607-6465
[phone]•FAX[phone] t�S
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer

Madison Landfill
(closed)
•
k , t F "T
� ,'' 4 .
' . i
.....
ill
?i
1
10444, „ow,, , - /
1 e
fE N
N
= Property Line Scale 1" = 400'
Site Number Applicable Acres Latitude Longitude
M1-1 30.9 N 36° 22' 37.2" W 79° 56'45.0"
Prepared by:
James C.Alexander
Precision Land Application,Inc.
July 2000

Madison Landfill
(closed)
t 3 a i ,Lfillr •.. - t
,� :'tL
♦ •s +
s / i �
, .-.--tr*,..4%' ,:fs —- #c.opi // • •
* . . ,
r �0 EGO
n
•
-1'',
. .�►' •r >
f, `
. . .—., v% ‘Villi
ti , nil \\ r
•'? rid I� t' t1 l r # (-Wodt.C/Zlli,
1�
''.c..t,' 4,:; ° rye a4` •�� A. w • ' • �,1%
•
r rC £ j �4} � "' { ,',#P�4f °, X_ lei ' t•'.. .f
r I h et. I
f S ' xy` -•et. ,`
I r lI
-';:;'IC'.;'.":--=t4; ,,"-'i:'?:::_-:;-'°,.,1:r.`..,.4,i,.---,•,,,'.: ,:,., '‘,.,1,..;,.,'±.7.":--i:*`.,i,,r...',4-,,.1.-,.;,,t,-'.„.i'..l-',1V*4,.:00.k.. .,.•_.--11,11;•...---''-'-'- ,=,-"=-',;-•: : '-r,'"):
•
draw i F S 7 t Q ._"- Jh - =S , i
3 }}
i °"' :t4I '(1 = ES� l'� .-Y ibra rU t 1 r /•I
zIl , i ►2�w rr d -4 ,1 a
I � t4. z
Scale: 1" =400'
Site Number Applicable Acres Latitude Longitude
M1-1 30.9 N 36° 22' 37.2" W 79° 56' 45.0"
Prepared by:
James C.Alexander
Precision Land Application,Inc.
July 2000

PLA
Precision Land Application, Inc.
4022 White Plains Rd.
Roaring River, NC 28669
[phone]

MEMO
DATE: 2/51?'I
�f 'Cr.,.... O� H�i""�
TO: ( e� SUBJECT: ft�r^^"^' AAA
1.-,,-01 /117/41,x.;-,
;S,utraw �-• n
1. ,...-_AJ-- 6),..,/,-;17 reeAr-4:,-;,----17,
v ct. /oo Y. -ts-frea-lar, vow— 0-v fic.1,4)-4.- ).,04t.4 6/..
o c ° .
seJ) 6 1-.2 o J 0.- i fi -" --/ i „ ► o l t." to J/i k__
6,tt,i, ',de) I\ 2 ,-v-v.744
�'�d ol.` ) Hr. tA°verrxo ...
1 o wr(, m�
vim''-�^�� �,.�..�
Jul��'s c� Yv�.f � `e.� T." 1 ffJ
/‘'‘,P)C•1 ir ci 2 A-TA,4,4,;7 ...,-tre._- ;,,,- 4- p e---:+- 1-1,4,--
r1c,,,. a.;id cL t /0 -1 •
yrs. oy �L 3--- 1 r-�rfi1,
----.4-*-44 .6._.-2, LA- 47;,..„
fik_ row, .6-67 apcia....._ a3 /,._iii.,1..., h-e-e,f34-.-,:.--ksopoi.--i
From: C, r'a9 '`e-
o�
AiltAt., North Carolina Department of Environment,
V,.,d):f.1Health, and Natural Resources 7-�
� � PrintedonRecycledPaper

�r

-4' ,It)-elittl 1•4.4i--. 1-L
cW f . -
-"DI
.x rrie<�
r c;,. e
,.=
i.,... ....t„,,,

1 DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GROUNDWATER SECTION
0cf ram, i 75F'
RECE!\'ED
N.C. Dept -1NR
MEMORANDUM
Site 1S st€ . OCT 1 1 1933
TO: Win
�1 Stow - -CA le lH Regional Office Fie(9 i o `1 CQ
FROM: ($n,i
SUBJECT: Application for Permit Renewal, Permit Amendment
(/ ii0014ftit'i Repair/Alteration of Exist.Disposal System[DEHJ
COMMENTS:
Facility Name: I o tA,w et, AA A i s c-w
County: a L ( ♦n G A'a''
Type of Project: /A A.,0$ Aff. i91t,o si, s l L<< _ tics., (i�.o 1p-t �/2¢c+.l f+e '"�
APPLICABLE PERMIT NO.s: WQOU/S c1I OW ''Y/33
DEH ANIMAL WASTE(DWQ)
• EPA(CONST. GRANTS) A to C
The Groundwater Section has received ONLY ONE(1)copy of the referenced permit application.A copy of the
application should have been sent to your Regional Water Quality Supervisor,so please use that copy for
your review - IF A COPY HAS NOT BEEN RECEIVED IN THE REGIONAL OFFICE,PLEASE LET ME KNOW.
The Groundwater Section has received ONLY ONE(1)copy of the referenced permit application.A copy of the
application should have been sent to ,DEH's Regional Soil Specialist,so please use
that copy for your review - IF A COPY HAS NOT BEEN RECEIVED IN THE REGIONAL OFFICE,PLEASE
LET ME KNOW.
✓The and*fite'Section -w. - two(a)copies of the referenced permit application. One copy of the application
dbcumeats wa retieteed
y
Please review the application materials for�` . If you feel additional information is necessary,please let
0 me know no later thanet, 2.E;,, t . A copy of any formal request for additional information will be
forwarded to you.
If you do not need any additional information to complete your review,please provide your final comments by
a u. 2) /9%$ . If you request and/or receive additional information,your final comments are
due no later than 14 days after you receive the additional information.
\9-98TRAN.SHL(rev. 9/29/98)

• State. of North•Carolina
'Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management RECEIVED
Non-Discharge Permit Application Form
WATER QUALITY SECTION
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL) SEP 2 8 199b
DISTRIBUTION OF OTHER RESIDUAL SOLIDS •
Non nave Permitting application is intended for facilities
sties which are EXEMPT from 40 CFR Part
I. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Applicant's name(please specify the name of the municipality,corporation,individual, etc.):
Town of Madison
2. Print owners or signing official's name and title(the person who is legally responsible for the facility and its compliance):
Michael C. Brooks, Administrator
3. Mailing address: 120 North Market Street
City: Madison State: NC Zip: 27025
Telephone Number: ( 336 ) 427-0221
4. Application Date: July 17, 1998
5. Fee Submitted: S 400.00 tme permit processing fee should be as specified in 15A NCAC 2H.0205(c)(5).]
6. Specify how these residuals will be distributed: sold or given away in bags or other containers; X lawn(bulk);
x home garden (bulk): x other, distributed over new park area and seeded as cover
7. if the alternative for residual disposal consists of"surface disposal" as defined under 40 CFR Part 503,please complete the
application titled "SURFACE DISPOSAL OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS. Please identify if there is any storage of residuals in
a surface impoundment or disposal thru landfilling. Explain:
8. Is the residual process facility also the generator? X Yes; No
9. Latitude: 36° 22' 45" Longitude: 79° 59' 04" of residual process facility
10. Specify whether the process facility is owned by: federal; private; state; X local government;
11. County where facility is located: Rockingham
I. PERMIT INFORMATION: n p�
1. Application No. (wi11 be competed by DEM): (1 (�`i� (�
2. Specify whether project is. X ney); renewal`; modification
For renewals, complete all sections included in the application. Engineering Signature and Seal not required for
renewals or if there is not any construction involved with the subject project.
3. If this application is being submitted as a result of a renewal or modification to an existing permit_ list the existing permit
number and its issue date
-ORM: DORS 06/94 Parc l of 7

III. FACILITY LNFORMATION (attach additional pages for additional sources of residuals): ' .
Nam;r,f`" —'`' rzaienzls are generated or prepared: Town of Madison, Water Treatment Plan}
2. Facility permit number: NC0085626 ;facility permit bolder: Town of Madison
3. Specify whether facility in Section III.1 is owned by: federal; private; state; X local government;
4. Specify facility design flow: 1.5 mgd; facility average daily flow: 0.583 mgd;
Type of residual storage: sediment beds for river sediment and alum: _ sludge
Volume of residual storage: 1600 CY/572.5 dry tons •
Length of residuals storage at facility: 4,745 days (the Division requires a minimum 30 days storage in units that
are separate from treatment system, i.e.not in clarifiers,aeration basins,etc.);
Estimated volume of residuals: 44.04 (dry,tons/yr.);
5. If the residual process facility is not the same as the generator,please specify delivery frequency and quantity of residual to •
be processed:
6. Facility contact(person familiar with residuals preparation): Willie Amburn
7. Facility contact's telephone number: ( 336 ) 427-3971
Lindsey Bridge Road
S. Location of treatment facility: Madison, NC State; Rockingham County
9. Mailing address: Town of Madison, WTP 120 North Market Street
Madison, NC 27025
10. Specify the source of the residuals: X treatment of water (alum sludges); treatment of industrial wastewater
(100% industrial residuals); treatment of industrial wastewater mixed with domestic wastewater (please specify
appropriate percentages of %industrial wastewater, %domestic wastewater);
other(explain): facility draws directly from river, large amount of river sediment
Attach an explanation of either the treatment process, manufacturing process, or how the waste is generated. Provide full
and complete details of the entire process.
11. Does the facility which generates the residuals have an approved pretreatment program? Yes; X No.
This includes facilities which are classified as a"Class I"facility (any publicly owned treatment works required. under 40
CFR 403.S, to have an approved pretreatment program or any facility treating domestic sewage that is classified as "Class
1" b) the appropriate federal or State authority)
V. RESIDUALS INFORMATION (attach additional pages for additional sources of residuals):
1. Information for Hazardous Waste (RCRA) Determination. The information requested on the limitations specified below
pertain only to those residuals that are generated from a municipal wastewater treatment facility with industrial contribution
or active pretreatment program and from any other treatment facility with wastewater sources that include industrial sources.
a. Are any of the residuals covered by this application listed in 40 CFR 261.31-26133? Yes; X No. If Yes,
list the number(s):
b. Do the residuals exhibit any of the four characteristics defined by 40 CFR 261.21-261.247 Yes: X No.
Attach laboratory results for the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure Analyses, Reactivity, Ignitability, and
Corrosivity for each residual.
-ORM: DORS 06/94 Page 2 of 7

Note:• if the following constituent levels(as determined by the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure Analyses)arc
exceeded in the residuals or if the pH of the residual is not within the range listed below, the residual is b)
definition a Hazardous waste. Chemical analyses must be made to Minimum Detection Levels.
EPM PPM
Arsenic 5.0 Barium 100.0
Benzene 0.5 Cadmium 1.0
Carbon tetrachloride 0.5 Chlordane 0.03
Chlorobenzene 100.0 Chloroform 6.0
Chromium 5.0 o-Cresol 200.0
m-Cresol 200.0 p-Cresol 200.0
Cresol 200.0 2,4-D 10.0
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 7.5 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.5
l.l-Dichloroethylene 0.7 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.13
Endrin 0.02 Heptachlor(and its hydroxide) 0.008
Hexachlorobenzene 0.13 Hexachloro-1.3-butadiene 0.5
Hexachloroethane 3.0 Lead 5.0
Lindane 0.4 Mercury 0.2
Metbexycblor 10.0 Methyl ethyl ketone 200.0
Nitrobenzene 2.0 Pentachlorophenol 100.0
Pyridine 5.0 Selenium 1.0
Silver 5.0 Tetrachloroethylene 0.7
Toxaphene 0.5 Trichloroethylene 0.5
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 400.0 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 2.0
2,4,5-TP (Silvex) 1.0 Vinyl chloride 0.2
pH (2:1 vol./wt.): >2.0 s.u. - <12.5 s.u.
NOTE: IF ANY OF THE RESIDUALS MEET THE DEFINITIONS OF A HAZARDOUS WASTE,
AS NOTED IN EITHER "A" OR "B" ABOVE, A PERMIT CANNOT BE ISSUED FOR
THAT MATERIAL AND IT SHOULD NOT BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THIS
APPLICATION.
2. For each residual,please attach a complete chemical analysis of the material. This analysis must be comprehensive enough
to completely characterize the residual and must be based upon a review of the process that generates the material. If the
facility that will generate the residual is not yet in operation, the characterization must be based on similar existing
facilities and projection based on the type of facility. The analysis must include a minimum of the following parameters
and any other known and suspected contaminants that are tributary to the system.
Cadmium Aluminum pH
Copper Ammonia-Nitrogen Phosphorus
Lead Calcium Potassium
Nickel Magnesium Sodium
Zinc Nitrate-Nitrite Nitrogen TICN
5 Total Solids Plant Available Nitrogen(by calculation) - N/A
3. Wastewater residuals can not be sold or given away if the concentration of any pollutant in the residuals exceeds the ceiling
concentrations specified in the table below. Specify the pollutant concentration of these residuals(attach lab analysis):
Pollutant Pollutant Ceiling Concentration (mg/kg) Pollutant Concentration (mg/kg)
Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis
Cadmium 85 0.3
Copper 4300 37
Lead 840 16
Nickel 420 20
Zinc 7500 I 95
-ORN1: DORS 06/94 Page 3 of 7

4 Provide,all applicable pilot studies and any bench scale'tests performed on each residual source and the results, includirt;,
the approximate fertilizer equivalent. N/A the alum residual is not being used as fertilizer.
It is being used as a soil amendment. •
5. Wastewater residuals can't be sold or given away in bags or other containers for application to the land unless one of the
following options is satisfied.
A Specify either A or B. Please be advised. if the residuals are to be sold or given away in bulk for application tc
lawn or home garden then Option A is the only option.
A. The pollutant concentration of the residuals must be less than Pollutant Monthly Average Concentrations
listed in the table below.
•
Monthly Average Concentrauons Pollutant Concentration
Pollutant Dry Weight Basis (mg/kg) Dry Weight Basis (mg/kg)
Cadmium 39 0.3
Copper 1500 37
Lead 300 16
Nickel 420 20
Zinc 2800 95
B. The product of the concentration of each pollutant in the residual and the annual whole residual applicatior.
rate for the residual shall not cause the Annual Pollutant Loading Rate to be exceeded.
in order for the Annual Whole Residual Application Rate (AWRAR) to be calculated the Annual Pollutant
Loading Rate (APLR) is divided by the pollutant concentration (PC) times 0.001 (a conversion factor) as
follows:
AWRAR= APLR
PC * 0.001
Pollutant Annual Pollutant Annual Whole Residual
Pollutant Concentration Loading Rates Application Rate
Dry Weight Basis (APLR) (AWRAR)
(m g/kg) kg/hectare kg/hectare
Cadmium 1.9
Copper _ 75
Lead 15
Nickel 21
Zinc 140
The AWRAR for the residual is the lowest AWRAR calculated. This is the maximum rate at which the
subject residual can be applied (to convert kg/hectare to lbs/acre multiply by 0.8924). Please specify
kg/hectare or lbs/acre:
AWRAR =
. PATHOGEN REDUCTION INFORMATION (attach add. pages for additional sources of residuals)
In accordance with 1SA NCAC 2H .0200, pathogen reduction can be achieved using either 40 CFR Part 257 or 40 CFR Part
503. Since the pathogen reduction requirements found in 40 CFR Part 257 (note, "Processes to Further Reduce Pathogens" or
PFRP) are incorporated into 40 CFR Part 503, only Pan 503 is listed below. Please check which of the following applies to
the subject residual:
FORM: DORS 06/94 Page 4 of 7

1. In order for the residuals to be Class A.in accordance with the pathogen requirements in 40 CFR 50332(a),either Part a or
Part b and one of the options in Part c must be completed(please submit all lab analysis,test results and calculations):
X a. A Fecal coliform density less than 1000 Most Probable Number per gram of total dry solids,or
b. A Salmonella sp. density less than 3 Most Probable Number per 4 grams of total dry solids.
c. In addition to Part a or Part b being met,one of the following alternatives must also be completed. Please
specify 1,2, 3,4,5a, 5b,Sc, 5d, 5e, 5f, 5g or 6 below being met:
1. jme/terkr•eratura - an increased residuals temperature should be maintained fur a prescribed period of time, in
accordance with the following guidelines. The results (D)shall be the amount of time,in days, that the residuals
shall remain at the given temperature: .
Time and Temperature Guidelines
Total Solids I Temperature (t) Minimum Time Eouation Notes
No heating of small
> or=7% > or=S0° C > or= 20 minutes D= 131.700.000 particles by warmed
i00.14 t gases or immiscible
liouid.
> or=7% > or= 50° C > or= 15 seconds D=131.700.000 Small particles heated by
100.14 t warmed gases or
immiscible liouid.
<7% > or=50° C >or= 15 seconds P= 131.700.000
to 100.14 t
< 30 minutes
< 7% > or= 50° C >or= 30 minutes D= 50.070.000
100.14 t .
2. alkaline treatment- the pH of the residuals is raised to greater than 12 for at least 72 hours. During this time, the
temperature of the residuals should be greater than 52°C for at least 12 hours. In addition, after the 72 hour
period, the residuals are to be air dried to at least 50%total solids.
3. prior testing for Enteric VirusNiable Helminth Ova -the residuals are analyzed for the presence of enteric viruses
(Plaque-forming units) [pfu)and viable belmintb ova. If the residuals are analyzed before the pathogen reduction
process and found to have densities of enteric virus <1 pfu/4 grams of total solids and viable belmintb dva<1/4g
total solids, the residuals are Class A with respect to enteric virus and viable helminth ova until the next
monitoring episode. If the residuals are analyzed before the pathogen reduction process and found to have densities
of enteric virus > or= 1 pfu/4 g total solids or viable helminth ova> or= 1/4 g total solids, and tested again after
processing and found to meet the enteric virus and viable helminth ova levels listed under "4" below, then the
processed residuals will be Class A with respect to enteric viruses and viable helminth ova when the operating
parameters for the pathogen reduction process are monitored and shown to he consistent with the values or ranges
C4.
of values documented.no prior testing for Enteric VirusNiable Helmira_.())-if the residuals are not analyzed before pathogen reduction
processing for enteric viruses and viable helminth ova, the density of enteric viruses must be less than 1 pfu/4 g of
total dry solids and the density of viable helminth ova must be less than 1/4 g of total dry solids, or the residuals
must be treated by a"Process to Further Reduce Pathogens"or a"Process to Further Reduce Pathogens" equivalent
process.
5. The "Processes to Further Reduce Pathogens" (PFRP)are described as follows:
•
a. Composting- using either the within-vessel or static aerated pile composting methods, the temperature of the
residuals are raised to 55°C or higher for three days. Using the windrow composting method.the residuals are
raised to 55° C or higher for fifteen days. During the high temperature period, there will be a minimum of five
turnings of the windrow.
FORM: DORS 06/94 Pare 5 of 7

b. tint Drying - residuals are dried by direct or indirect contact with bot gases to reduce the moisture cotiterit o
the residuals to 10% or lower. Either the temperature of the gas in contact with the residuals exceeds 80°C c.
the -.ve: b::lh temperature of the gas in contact with the residuals. when the residuals leave the.dryer. exceer
80° C. -
c. }irat Treatment-liquid residuals are heated to a temperature of 180°C or higher for thirty minutes.
d. ThcrmoDhilic Aerobic Digestion -liquid residuals are agitated with air or oxygen to maintain aerobic condition,
at residence times of ten days at temperatures of 550 C to 60°C.
e. Beta Ray Irradiation - residuals are irradiated with beta rays from an accelerator at dosages of at least 1.0
megarad at room temperature(ca.20°C).
f. Gamma Ray Irradiating -residuals are irradiated with gamma rays from certain isotopes such as 60Co ant
137Ce,at dosages of at least 1.0 megarad at room temperature(ca. 20°C).
g. Pasteurization - the temperature of the residuals is maintained at 70°C or higher for at least thirty minutes.
6. The residuals shall be treated in a process that is equivalent to a"Processes to Further Reduce Pathogens" (PFRP),
as determined by the permitting authority based on evaluations of the recommendations provided by the Pathogen
Equivalency Committee.
VI. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Please provide a brief narrative concerning materials handling, including the following:
a. How will the materials will be handled and transported from where the residuals were produced to where it will be
treated?
b. Where will the residuals be stored until processed? The alum sludge will be stored in the Town's alum
sludge storage basin at the Water Treatment Plant
c. How will leachate collection be handled? The Town's personnel will remove the sludge and
d. What will be the duration of treatment? haul it in bulk to Town—owned property where it
will be immediately distributed and seeded.
e. Where will the final product be stored?
f. How Icng will the final product be stored before being distributed?
g. How will the final product be distributed(packaging)?
2. Please attach a marketability statement detailing destinations and approximate amounts of the final product to be
distributed. The entire amount of the final product will be used on Town—owned proprty as a
soil amendment.
3. Please provide either a label which shall be affixed to the bagged processed residual or an information sheet which shall be
provided to the person who receives the processed residual. The label or information sheet shall contain,at a minimum, the
following information:
a. The name and address of the person who prepared the residual that is sold or given away in a bag or other container for
application to the land.
b. A statement that application of the residual to the land is prohibited except in accordance with the instructions on the
label or information sheet.
c. A statement that the residuals shall not be applied to any site that is flooded, frozen or snow-covered.
d A statement that adequate procedures shall be provided to prevent surface runoff from carrying any disposed or stored
residuals into any surface waters.
e. Information on all applicable buffers including a 10 foot buffer between application site and any public or private water
supply source(including wells)and any stream.lake,river, or natural drainage way.
f. The Annual Whole Residual Application Rate(AWRAR)for the residual that does not cause any of the annual
pollutant loading rates to be exceeded(if necessary).
The Town intends to use teh entire amount of sludge. The Town does not intend to
distribute the alum sludge to the public, and therefore the information sheet is not
applicable. The Town will be held to the conditions of the permit.
FORM: DORS 06/94 Pars 6 of 7

•
Name and Complete Address of Engineering Firm: Dewberry & Davis
551 Piney Forest Road
City: Danville State: VA Zip: 24540
Telephone Number: ( 804 ) 797-4497
•
Professional Engineer's Certification:
I, Mike Daugherty . attest that this application for the Town of Madison —
Distribution of Other Residual Solids
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I further attest that to the best of my knowledge
the proposed design has been prepared in accordance with the applicable regulations. Although certain portions of this submittal
package may have been developed by other professionals, inclusion of these materials under my signature and seal signifies that I have
reviewed this material and have judged it to be consistent with the proposed design.
North Carolina Professional Engineer's Seal,Signature,and Date: .�wite���,,,,
• ,,,00%,,;H.CAROZ
4° OESSIOC;/,y � •_
tt 15509
'•.••/GiNE\••..$1
Applicant's Certification:
I, Michael Books, Town Manager . attest that this application for the Town of Madison --
Distribution of other Residual Solids
_has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required parts of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting informadon•and attachments are not included. this application package
will be returned to me as incomplete. /
Signature epee:
--- G� /
Date _! Z`
•
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE. INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND
MATERIALS, SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLOWLNG ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT
POST OFFICE'BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: (919) 733-5083
-ORN1: DORS t)6194 7 of 7

•
Water Technology and Controls, Inc.
Environmental Laboratory
Laboratory Certification No.165
Client Town of Madison Report Date: 3/10/98
Contact: Mr.Mike Morrison Date Sample Rcvd: 2/2/98
WT&C Work Order# 02029806 Sample: Sludge Lagoon Grab 2/2/98
Parameters Result
%Total Solids 62.65
Results corrected to dry wt.
Helminth Ova <1 viable ova/31.3 gin dry solids
Enteric Viruses <1 PFU virus/ 62.6 gm dry solids
I hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these dam. I I�- 1,041
Maurice H.Vaughan,Jr.
Laboratory Supervisor
642 Tamco Road, Reidsville, North Carolina 27320
tel.[phone] tax.[phone]

A •• •• -c •
-sr- RESEARCH & ANAIyTICA[ •
••W • >� �y� '�� "
C
• 0: cn :
' LABORATORIES, INC. ' •
'to NC #34 Z
•
Analytical/Process Consultations •
-81111101
Toxicity Characteristic Leachate Procedure (TCLP) Analysis of Sample Identified as Silt Pond for The Town of Madison
22 June 1995)
Sample Sample Sample Sample EPA HW Results Characteristic
Identification Number Date Matrix Number Contaminant Jmc/I1 Level(mc/l) EPA Method
Silt Pond 241491 6/22/95 Solid D-004 Arsenic <0.100 5.0 7060
• D-005 Banum 0.319 100.0 6010
• D-018 Benzene <0.010 0.50 8240
" D-006 Cadmium <0.010 1.0 6010
• D-019 Carbon Tetrachloride <0.010 0.50 8240
' " D-020 Chlordane <0.003 0.030 8080
• • D-021 Chlorobenzene <0.010 100.0 8240
• D-022 Chloroform <0.100 6.0 8240
• D-07'7 Chromium 0.018 5.0 6010
• D-023 0-Creosol <20 200.0 8270
" D-024 M-Creosol . <20 200.0 8270
• D-025 p-Creosol <20 200.0 8270
• " D-026 Creosol <20 200.0 8270
• D-016 2.4-D <1.0 10.0 8150
• D-027 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.750 7.50 8270
• D-028 1.2-Dichloroethane <0.010 0.50 S240
" D-029 1.1-Dichloroethylene <0.010 0.70 3240
- D-030 2.4-Dininotoluene <0.010 0.130 8270
- . D-012 Endrin <0.002 0.020 8080
• " D-031 Heptachlor <0.0008 0.008 8080
• • D-032 Hexachlorobenzene <0.010 0.130 8270
• • " " D-033 Hexachlorobutadiene <0.050 0.50 8270
. - D-034 Hexachloroethane <0.300 3.0 8270
- " D-008 Lead <0.100 5.0 6010
• D-013 Lindaae <0.04 0.4 8080
• • " D-009 Mercury <0.002 0.2 7470
• - D-014 Methoxychlor <1.0 10.0 8050
• D035 Methyl Ethyl Ketone <0.500 200.0 8240
• • " D-036 Nitrobenzene <0.200 2.0 8270
. " D-037 Pentachloropheaol <10 100.0 8270
. " • D-038 Pyridine <0.500 5.0 8240
- " D-010 Selenium <0.100 1.0 7740
- " D-011 Silver <0.010 5.0 6010
- " D-039 Tetrachloroethylene <0.010 0.7 8240
• " • D-015 Toxaphene <0.05 0.5 R080
• - D-040 Tnchloroethylene <0.010 0.5 8240
- " • ' D-041 2.4.5-Trichiorophenol <40 400.0 8270
" • D-042 2,4.6-Trichlorophenol <0.200 2.0 8270
• • " D-017 2.4.5-TP(Silvex) <0.10 1.0 50
" . D-043 Vinyl Chloride <0.010 0.2 ,
• - - D-003 Cyanide(Reacnvity) <1.D mg/kg (°
- D-003 Sulfide(Reactivity) <2.0 mg/kg .J \\c AO
• • D-002 pH(Corrosivity) 6.5 Sid. Units p� It1
DM01 Flash Point(lgniubilin >140°r ,�l A'�
mg/; = milligrams per liter = parts per million i �`� � (J.L v O
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram = parts per million } € `- , �/ v 0 �""
< = less than or below detection limits (BDL) �U i �� �V �7•_ ,1:'�� r
4
P 0 Sox 47'3 • 10E Short Street • r pr:^.e";viue. ^icrtr..Carolina 27284 • 91t - -

• 1Steal rt1 ,
orSernc es, Inc.
Client: Water Technology and Controls, Inc. Sample Date: February 2, 1998
Address: 642 Tamco Road Sample Received: February 5, 1998
Reidsville, NC 27320
Laboratory Analysis Report
Amount Analyzed Results
Samplen
ID Sample Sample# Parameter Analyst (wet weight){wet weight) 9
Helminth Ova 50 gm PM <1 viable ova/50 gm total solids
020206 98036-019
Enteric Viruses 100 gm PM <1 PFU virus/100 gm total solids
PFU=Plaque Forming Unit MPN=Most Probable Number
Methods Used under 40CFR Part503
Enteric Viruses: ASTM Method D 4994-89, Part A&B. 1989.
Helminth Ova: EPA. December. Control of Pathoaens and Vector Attraction in Sewage Sludge.
EPA Pub.600/1-87/014 Office of Research and Development, Cincinnati, OH.
Project No.: 98036-019

Water Technology and Controls, Client. _ Tel: •
Inc. /Ck.,.,n clX/'''Iced,1.0(.1 336 A L'7 - v!,.t�: .
642 Tamco Road Address: Fax:
Reidsville, NC 27320
/2:; Pic,deef S 1- Acj,-s,.. ft%C27041— '3 3b/y27- 2-s"'l S_
c I' I tel. [phone] Attention: P.O.#:
s... / fax. [phone] n` nt
Person Taking Sample(signature): Project I
act )
Chain of Custody Record If Composite? ��G�, �� [Lab Use Only
Sample Date Time Date Time Comp? I of Tests Required On pH OK?
Locatlon/It7# 1 1 2 2 Grab? Cents. Ice? Cl2 OK?
7-4/4 c( aft) C:..k 1Tel,H. ,-h CJ1— r77
2
-,
124 12 4 0 CD t t, 5c,bos 4
_ ,
. .
. .
Method of Shipment: Comments:
p UPS
j¢/7,-4 NI. kt. VG 4Y 11„
CJ Fed Ex
Relinquished by: Date: Time: Received by: Date: Time:
0 Fiend Delivery Jt'JB-y12 2-A-A;-
Relinquished by: Date: Time: Rece 1 i y: Date: Time:
LI Other alb
Relinquished by: Date: Time: Recei 1
7 1
Date: V Time:

}
�;., IRESEARCII & ANAly11CAl CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD •
:4 ,S LABORATORIES, INC.
`�f•S,�' Analytical/Process Consultations
' Phone[910] 996-2841
WATER/WASTEWATER MISC. •
JOB NO. PROJECT NAME moo•
,,n a •
�OOil Of /,l4^c�l SOr/ `,�
if y y
Wa SAMPLERS (SIGNATURE) Qf' 1 6
o moV- y •` Qs'D4.. �o
U .z U 'o c-:Z . �0
U. Q' �y O O r O ,�
�� ' O Cs C12 0 Q m0c°ic' 4 Q
Z O pF O� lC Q 0 QO Q a�,e,
SAMPLE NO. DATE TIME COMP STATION LOCATION ry�ry ryh IV ^ y` REQUESTED ANALYSIS
k/ofq( 6 -aa a.•il s;!-1 Add 3 1cLP
1
RELINQUISH D , DATE/TIME RE EIVED Y REMARKS:
..
RELINO JISHED BY DATE/TIME RECEIVE:t1�: S 6 °r j t.Q P c c,.cZi n6 c t.r mot,
RELIWO)ISNED BY DATE/TIME RECEIVED BY e �/ at,,,, QA.ri,.
/Q /
� y I cI>c�ta r.c.+._ q 1t. ,

•
WATER TECHNOLOGY AND CONTROLS, INC.
Water Treatment Chemistries & Environmental Laboratory
August 5, 1997
Mr. Mike Morrison
Town of Madison WWTP
120 N. Market St.
Madison, NC 27025
Dear Mr. Morrison:
Enclosed are results for the Alum Sludge sample taken on
July 22, 1997.
If you have any questions concerning these data please
contact me.
Sincerely,
ltuktlz/
Mike Vaugan
Laboratory Supervisor
•
Offices: 106-A South Walnut Circle • P.O. Box 8808 • Greensboro, N.C. 27419 • [phone]
Laboratory: 642 Tamco Road • Reidsville, N.C. 27320 • [phone]

•
WATER TECHNOLOGY AND CONTROLS, INC.
r° Environmental Laboratory
•
642 Tamco Rd. Reidsville, N. C. 27320
(910) 342-4748
Laboratory Certification No. 165
Customer: Town of Madison WWTP
Contact Person: Mr. Mike Morrison
Date Sample Rcvd: 07/22/97
Report Date: 08/05/97
WT&C Number: 07229748
Sample: Alum Sludge 7/22/97
PARAMETERS RESULTS
pH 5. 56 Std. units
Ammonia Nitrogen <10 mg/kg dry wt.
Nitrate Nitrogen 10. 5 mg/kg dry wt.
Nitrite Nitrogen <0. 5 mg/kg dry wt.
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen 1, 853 mg/kg dry vt.
Total Phosphorus <5 mg/kg dry wt.
Aluminum, total 68, 400 mg/kg dry wt.
Cadmium, total 0. 3 mg/kg dry wt.
Copper, total 37. 0 mg/kg dry wt.
Lead, total 16. 0 mg/kg dry vt.
Nickel, total 20. 0 mg/kg dry wt.
Zinc, total 95. 0 mg/kg dry wt.
Calcium, total 648 mg/kg dry wt.
Magnesium, total 3250 mg/kg dry wt.
Potassium, total 3870 mg/kg dry wt.
Sodium, total 3110 mg/kg dry wt.
Percent Total Solids 42. 37%
'Fecal Coliform <10 Col/100m1
'Note: Result is based on 1. 0 g (wet ) of sample dissolved in 100mL
of water. Ten milliliters of that prepared sample was filtered and
no colonies were present.

Water Technology and Controls, Inc.
642 Tarnco Road Client: Tel:
Reidsville, NC 27320 7oc�,rt c�'� J� ��� f�-•li.-'rP 42•? -OS LOI•L
`` 1 2'X�2 Fax: : .
tel. [phone]ti Address:
,, iri/ • tax. [phone] /ZO N HAS 1- • 14_I00.,,f 1- c-4 2? — 2-5-6 S
\•..--- Attention: P.O.#:
Chain of Custody Record ;k I
0-I 77•a 4 Person Taking Sample(signature): Project#
4 If Composite? Lab Use Only
69 Wig%---` -
• Sample Date Time Date Time Comp? a of Tests Required On pH
Location/ID# 1 1 2 2 Grab? Cents.
Ice? OK?
MI•fil? Cf 5E _ a N1+3 P. +, rkN
V
I1 i, sc,),Js j P4, /0o,
r•e_,...„, ) A
i-t 13 .0
•
Method of Shipment: Comments:
❑ UPS
❑ FED EX
Relinquished by: Date: Time: ffecieved by: Date: Time:
f !land Delivery ,Yf& 111 t . 7—2 Z
lelinquished by: Date: Time: flecieved by: Date: Time:
❑other I
Relinqui3ped by: Date: Time: Reciev: y: Date: a ill
Time: fi3M

State of North Carolina
AtTigDepartment of Environment .
and Natural Resources •
Division of Water Quality V
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary NCDENR
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
November 9, 1998
Mr.Micheal C.Brooks 1V tD
Admininstrator , - C, Oita
Town of Madison ' `' .
120 North Market Street 1998
Madison,NC 27025 NOV t /5-g/g
t, t Subject: Application No. WQ00.1-5t t
{`t'# T , ; Additional Information Request
Alum Sludge Bulk Land Application.01
on Public Use Sites
Town of Madison
Rockingham County
Dear Mr.Brooks:
The Non Discharge Permitting Unit has completed a preliminary review of the subject application. The
following items must be addressed before we can complete our review:
1. Pathogenic Components of Water Treatment Plant Residuals. Pathogen testing of the Alum sludge
indicated very low values for fecal coliform, salmonella, helminth ova, and enteric viruses when
compared to values for sewage sludge biosolids; however, with water treatment plant residuals there
are concerns about other pathogens especially giardia lamblia and cryptosporidium parvum. The
water treatment plant residuals can act as a concentration point for these pathogens. With
consideration of the proposed disposal to public use sites, please provide information regarding
the reduction of giardia lamblia and cryptosporidium parvum in your water treatment plant
residuals.
A lower risk disposal alternative such as a dedicated land application site with siting requirements,
equivalent to a Class B wastewater treatment plant biosolid would be a less risky alternative. If you
would like to alter your application to a Class B pathogen equivalent disposal practice, please
complete and submit 5 copies of the attached application with required support documentation.
2. Phosphorus Uptake by Aluminum. The aluminum in water treatment plant residuals can uptake
phosphorus in the soil and reduce crop yields. This problem is "easy to correct with either adjusted
management practices or additional phosphorus fertilizer." Information on land application of water
treatment plant Alum sludges, and these effects are enclosed for your review. Please submit the
management practice you will use to mitigate the phosphorus uptake.
3. Alkalini . The alkalinity of the residual is less than 6.0s.u. which is less than typically expected for
a um s u ges. Any permit issued will require the maintenance of a minimum pH of the residual/soil
mixture of 6.0 for reasons related to both agronomics and metals bio-availability. Please provide a
management practice to maintain the pH above 6.0 s.u.
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/10%post-consumer paper

Refer to the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. Please submit
five (5) copies of all information to my attention at the address below. Also, please note that failure to
provide this additional information on or before December 10, 1998 will subject your application to being
returned as incomplete, in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0208.
If you have any questions on this matter, please call me at(919) 733-5083 ext. 544.
Sincerely,
• Joe Pearce
Environmental Engineer
Non Discharge Permitting Unit
cc:
Bob C eek,Groundwater Section
Permit File WQ0015919

ASCE Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice No.88
AWWA Technology Transfer Handbook
U.S. EPA/625/R-95/008
Technology Transfer Handbook:
Managementof
Water Treatment
PI a
n es � uas _
. : _ .- :- i as .1 +�.-'r' . y",� 4.. '+r-f`:c- '"?`�'-r'a•r-�` '..=tea..- _
. - ..• -.. t ..--•s.--.. '...... .''':./ t . ' ''''.- .....t..4.0:-.3.._,. _...1..z s
tlrl $
` s._.7y. _ -v.^ t' : -"�:,. ' +L t:�
)� 1,--- a - r.yT+ ..v." :' -, _ � a --- z...
-0
1
-- --- 4 -t" -4.- ' 4 -0 , —4_ :--_-r_i - -- ' — VI - ''..--7---: -.."- -
iu
i-=. » .ice i.hs ve
s/' dF F .,.... ..aa' ` �� •� .- ' d 1
•
American Society of Civil Engineers -,-.
EPA American Water Works Association
•, ' weU.S. Environmental Protection Agency
•

ets the performance standard of RCRA Subtitle drain for 5 minutes. The solids are considered a liquid
has been approved by the permit writer. waste if any liquid passes through the filter during the
le D establishes specific criteria for the following 5-minute period.
II operational factors: regulated hazardous waste 2 3.2 Summary
action program, cover material, disease vector con-
I,explosive gases control,air criteria,access require- In summary, neither 40 CFR Part 257 nor Part 258
ments, storm water run-on and runoff management, requires that WTP plant residuals be stabilized or have
surface water, liquids restrictions, recordkeeping. a certain percent solids concentration.40 CFR Part 258
The most extensive portion of Subtitle D pertains to does require that the residuals pass a paint filter test
ground-water monitoring and corrective action.The rule prior to co-disposal with solid wastes in a landfill. Both
mandates that all landfills must have a monitoring sys- regulations require that the filled areas be periodically
tern that yields sufficient ground-water samples from covered to protect public health. Both regulations re-
around the site.Both upgradient and downgradient wells quire attention to protection of ground and surface water
and sampling are required. Tests to detect 15 heavy sources and control of gas migration.
metals and 47 volatile organic compounds must be' Some states may impose further restrictions on bulk or
conducted, but approved states can modify the list to special wastes such as those produced during water
reflect site-specific conditions. treatment. Besides the paint fitter test, states also re-
The financial assurance requirements of RCRA are de- quire a minimum total solids content. Nebraska, one of
signed to guarantee that funds will be available for the most restrictive states, requires a minimum total
closure and postclosure care of landfills and, if needed, solids content of 70 percent. Some states also have a
corrective action.All landfills are required to install a final maximum allowable ratio of residuals-to-municipal solid
cover system with at least two components, an infiltra- waste.
lion layer and an erosion layer.The minimum final cover
requirements mandate an infiltration layer at least 18 2.4 Land Application
inches thick with a very low permeability limit, and an
erosion layer at least 6 inches thick that can sustain 2.4.1 Federal Regulations
native plant growth. A written closure plan must be
submitted to the state solid waste director. Postclosure Land application of WTP residuals is typically regulated
care must be provided for 30 years;it includes maintain- at the state level.The recently developed federal stand-
ing the final cover, the leachate collection and disposal ards for the use or disposal of sewage residuals (40
system, the ground-water monitoring program, and the CFR Part 503) specifically exclude WTP residuals. Cri-
landfill gas monitoring system. teria for classification of solid waste disposal facilities
and practices (40 CFR Part 257), however, could affect
WTP residuals that are co-disposed of with municipal land application of WTP residuals (see Table 2-1).This
solid waste in a sanitary landfill do not have to meet rule regulates the disposal of nonhazardous wastes,
numerical pollutant limits. The residuals, however, can- which include residuals generated from a WTP. The
not be hazardous and must not contain free liquids. objective of this rule is to prevent construction or opera-
Mechanical and natural dewatering of residuals is often tion of a residuals processing or disposal facility from
adequate for removing the free liquid from the water adversely affecting surface water, ground water, endan-
treatment solids. Because EPA requires landfill opera- gered or threatened wildlife, or public health. Criteria
tors to make random inspections of incoming waste or were established under 40 CFR Part 257 regulating
take other steps to ensure that incoming loads do not application of residuals containing cadmium and poly-
contain regulated hazardous wastes, landfill operators chlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). As discussed in Chapter
may require residuals disposers to prove their solids are 3 on residuals characterization, concentrations of cad-
not hazardous. Hazardous wastes (as defined in 40 mium and PCBs in WTP residuals are usually below
CFR Part 261)are waste materials that exhibit ignitabil- detection levels, making these criteria inapplicable.
ity,corrosivity, reactivity, or toxicity (see Section 2.7). Specific requirements for controlling disease vectors are
EPA now prohibits the disposal of noncontainerized or also included under Part 257 to prevent adverse public
bulk liquid wastes in landfills.Subtitle D requires that the health impacts resulting from application of solid
landfill owner or operator determine if the wastes (in- wastes/residuals.Criteria are also established to protect
cluding municipal water treatment solids) are liquid ground-water quality beyond the application site bound-
wastes according to the Paint Filter Liquids Method ary. Land application activities must not cause specific
9095.This simple test is performed by placing a repre- organic and inorganic chemicals to exceed maximum
sentative sample of the solids in a mesh Number 60 contaminant levels in the area.These criteria generally
paint filter (available at paint stores) and allowing it to should not affect the ability to land-apply WTP residuals.
9

2.4.2 State Regulations dispose of WTP residuals such as brines via under-
ground injection.
Most state agencies are waiting for EPA to establish land
application criteria for WTP residuals.Despite the differ- 2.5.1 Underground Injection Control Program
ences in their characteristics,many states apply WWTP
biosolids criteria, such as metals loading limits, to the Underground injection may be a disposal option for
land application of WTP residuals. concentrates and brines from drinking water treatment
processes.This option is subject to regulatory approval
Some states have taken it on themselves to establish under the underground injection control (U IC) program,
specific criteria for land application of WTP residuals. authorized by the Safe Drinking Water Act(SDWA).The
For example, the Colorado Department of Health regu- UIC program regulates the subsurface placement of
lates beneficial land application of WTP residuals under fluid in wells or dug-holes with a depth greater than their
domestic sewage sludge regulations (Colorado, 1986). width. The program covers the disposal of hazardous
The department has established specific regulations waste and various other substances in wells.
pertaining to the beneficial use of WTP residuals on
land. These regulations require development of an ap- After the 1980 amendments to the SDWA, EPA devel-
proved beneficial use plan that: oped a mechanism to grant individual states primary
enforcement responsibility for underground injection.
• Identifies where the material will be used. The UIC regulations are enforced through a permitting
• Contains approval from the land owner and the ap- system. Each state is required to develop a UIC permit
propriate county health department. program that enforces EPA standards, prevents under- -
ground injection unless authorized by a permit or rule,
• Contains residuals analyses. authorizes underground injection only where the proc-
ess will not endanger drinking water sources,and main-
• Identifies the types of crops to be grown and the tains thorough records and inspection reports.Currently,
application rates. all 50 states have established UIC programs, some of
Parameters to be analyzed include aluminum, arsenic, which are managed by EPA regional offices.
cadmium, pH,total solids, and nutrients. If WTP residu-
als are used with biosolids,then the practice must corn- 2.5.1.1 Classification of Underground injection
ply with the biosolids regulations. Application to land Wells
where root crops or low-growing crops are to be grown To prevent contamination of drinking water sources,EPA
is prohibited if the crops are intended for human con- established regulatory controls and a classification sys-
sumption. tern based on the type of waste injected and the location
The Colorado Department of Health does not allow of the injection well (40 CFR 146.5):
beneficial use of WTP residuals with radioactivity levels • Class I includes wells used to inject hazardous waste,
exceeding 40 picocuries total alpha activity per gram or industrial and municipal waste beneath the lower-
(pCi/g) of dry residuals. most formation containing an underground source of
The Missouri Department of Natural Resources has also drinking water within 1/4 mile of the well bore.
established guidelines for land application of alum re- • Class II includes wells used to inject fluids generated
siduals. These guidelines recommend that soil pH be from oil and natural gas production and refining.
maintained near 7.0 for alum residuals application and • Class Ill includes wells that are injected with liquid
that total aluminum loading to the soil not exceed 4,000 (such as water) for extraction of minerals including
lb/acre without site-specific investigations. No restric- sulfur, uranium, and other metals in situ.
tions apply to land application of lime softening residuals
(Missouri, 1985). • Class IV includes wells that are used to inject haz-
ardous or radioactive wastes into or above a forma-
2.5 Underground Injection tion containing an underground source of drinking
water within 1/4 mile of the well. This class of wells
The federal government has promulgated regulations also includes wells used to dispose of hazardous
for injecting wastes into the ground. Most states have waste into or above a formation containing an aquifer
fully adopted these regulations and have been granted that has been exempted pursuant to 40 CFR 146.04.
primacy for enforcing the program. These regulations. • Class V includes the injection wells that are not cov '"
alone, however, will probably not prevent underground ered in Classes I through IV.
injection of WTP residuals. Some states, such as Flor-
ida, have chosen to promulgate and/or issue stricter Wells used for underground injection of WTP residuals
regulations and/or policies, making it very difficult to fall into Classes I,.IV,and V.
10

•
1
t
S.
:F
I
I
Chapter 8
Land Application
I
Land application is an increasingly popular disposal Although these criteria are only designed for sewage
option in the water supply industry due to the escalating sludge, or biosolids, they may provide general guide-
regulatory and environmental constraints associated lines for use or disposal of WTP residuals. The guide-
with other disposal options. Land application options for lines contain numerical values for biosolids application i
water treatment plant (WTP) residuals include agricul- rates that are based on experiments with biosolids,and
tural use, silvicultural application, application for recla- risk assessment algorithms developed using the
mation to disturbed and marginal lands,and disposal to biosolids data.The criteria should not be used for deter-
dedicated lands (U.S. EPA, 1995b). In addition to the mining land application rates of WTP residuals.
obvious advantages of waste disposal, this application
process may beneficially modify soil properties while The risk assessment algorithms that were used as a
recycling residual components.Potential disadvantages technical basis for the Part 503 rule contain data that i
of land application of WTP residuals include an increase were obtained from field studies using biosolids. There ,
in the concentration of metals in the soil and possibly in is no way to determine,without similar field studies done
ground water; adsorption of soil phosphorus by water specifically on WTP residuals, whether residuals would
residuals,decreasing the productivity of the soil;exces- demonstrate the same behavior as that of biosolids.
sive application of nitrogen, resulting in the transport of Therefore, land application of WTP residuals should be
nitrate to ground water; and possible effects caused by based on the criteria set forth in 40 CFR Pari257,and not x
the application of poorly crystallized solids of aluminum on the criteria developed under Part 503.If WTP residu-
(Dempsey et al., 1990). als are field tested and their behavior relative to
biosolids is known, then it is possible that the risk as-
This chapter provides decision-makers with the basic sessment methodology used in Part 503 could be used to
information they need to evaluate land application as a develop criteria for WTP residual use in land application.
disposal option for WTP residuals.A simplified planning
procedure for land application is presented in Figure 8-1. Regulations vary from state to state but typically require
that residuals be tested for total metals concentrations,
8.1 Regulatory Requirements nutrients, and pH. The application rate of WTP sludge I
may be selected to limit hydraulic loading, nitrogen con-
The Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 defined WTP tent, or metal content.
residuals as industrial waste, and they are listed as a
solid waste under 40 CFR Part 257. If land application
is to be considered a viable option,the residuals cannot 8.2 Environmental Considerations z
be hazardous. Section 2.7 outlines a method for deter-
mining whether the residuals are hazardous.Other than When land application was originally investigated as a
those listed in 40 CFR Part 257,specific federal regula- potential disposal option for WTP residuals, it was
tions do not exist for the water industry, and most state thought that the lack of organic components and the
regulatory agencies use the same criteria for WTP high metals content in WTP residuals would inhibit the •
wastes as they use for other industrial sludges.Accord- water industry from accepting this option.Since then, a
ing to 40 CFR Part 257, criteria in the following areas number of studies have examined the potential limiting
must be met:.floodplains, endangered species, surface effects of WTP residuals on soil parameters. Most stud-
water, ground water, disease vectors, air emission,and ies to date have focused on identifying the effects of
safety.The regulations also contain application limits for WTP residuals on the physical characteristics of soil and •
cadmium(Cd), and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). on determining the potential for these wastes to cause •
phosphorus deficiency in plants. Current research has
The Clean Water Act (40 CFR Part 503), establishes yielded a better understanding of the chemical charac-
criteria for land application of sewage sludge solids teristics of WTP residuals and has produced analytical
generated during the treatment of domestic sewage. techniques to quantitatively predict these effects when
136

•
Determine Physical and Chemical Sludge Characteristics
(Chapter 3 and Section 8.2.1)
Review Applicable Regulations and
Guidelines for Land Application
Federal,State,and Local(Chapter 2 and Section 8.1)
Begin Public Participation
(Section 8.4.2)
Compare Sludge Characteristics With
Regulatory Requirements and
Choose Land Application Option
I I
Agricultural and
Silviculture!Application Dedicated Land Reclamation
os4l
(Sections 8.3.1 and 8.3.2) Land Disposal
(Section8.3.4) (Section 8.3.3)
I
Select Application Site Based on Acreage Required for
Sludge Application,Costs,and Land Area Available
(Section 8.3)
Determine Sludge Transportation and Application Systems
Based on Operational Considerations and Costs
(Section 8.4.1 and Section 8.4.3)
Determine Storage Requirements and Rates of Application
(Section 8.4.1)
Develop Soil and Ground-water Monitoring Programs
(Section 8.4.4)
Figure 8-1. Simplified planning procedure for land application of WTP residuals.
applied to land. The conclusions of this research are these components might have on agricultural soil after
described below. land application.Table 8-1 shows the composition of WTP
residuals compared with sewage sludge and agronomic
8.2.1 Major Components of Water Treatment soils in the United States.The cadmium reading of 5.15
Residuals and Their Impact on Soil parts per million (ppm) is much higher than is typically
Parameters found in WTP residuals.This is particularly true now that
chemical suppliers are more conscious of heavy metals
A 1990 American Water Works Association Research
Foundation study of'land application of WTP residuals contaminants in coagulants,the major source of metals
was conducted to establish a scientific basis for land in residuals. Most cadmium levels in residuals are less
than 1 to 2 ppm and are often undetectable.
application of WTP residuals.This study examined data
regarding the chemical composition and fractionation of WTP residuals are predominantly inorganic and consist
WTP residuals,the phytotoxicity of WTP residuals, and of clays,humic substances,and other materials typically
the effects of these residuals on the physical and nutri- suspended or dissolved in lakes and streams. Typical
ent status of soil. The study also investigated concen- WTP residuals contain 3 percent or less organic carbon
trations of residuals'major components, and the impact by weight and 0.5 percent or less organic nitrogen by
137

1
Table 8-1. Composition of WTP Residuals Compared With Table 8-2. Agronomic Components In WTP Residuals' .
Sewage Sludge and Agronomic Soils'
Sewage Parameter Range of Valuesb
Constituent WTP Residualsb Sludge` Agronomic Soil Total solids(%) 8.14-81
Aluminum 60,111.0(52,095) 72,000d Volatile solids (%) 9.32-29.09
Arsenic 14.7(14.7) 9.93(18.84) 72d Conductivity(µnrho/cm) 563.8(5302)
Barium 122.5 (127.52) 580d pH (S.U.) 6.98-8.82
Boron 40.7(61.3) 33d Total IGeldahl nitrogen(%) 0.495(0256)
Cadmium 5.15 (11.67) 6.94(11.76) 0265(0253)° Organic nitrogen (%) 0.752(0.399) tt
Calcium 20,815.0(33,108) 24,000d Ammonia-nitrogen(%) 0.016(0.016) i
Chromium 49.5 (56.5) 118.6(3392) 54d Nitrate-nitrite(%) 0.003(0.003)
Copper 2702(326.1) 7412(961.8) 29.6(40.6)6 Total phosphorus(%) 0226(0248)
Iron 52,751.0(63,642) 26,000d Total potassium(%) 0225(0.317) r
Lead 79.9(1002) 134.4(197.8) 12.3(7.5)• 'Data are presented as a range or as arithmetic mean and standard t
deviation ( ). These data should be used with caution. Individual =
Manganese 385.4(398.5) 9,000d residuals may vary significantly from those used in this table.
d b Survey of 12 land-applied WTP residuals,including 10 alum and 2 i
Mercury 1.5(2.5) 52(15.5) 0.09 ferric(Brobst, 1994). t
Molybdenum 9.1 (12.9) 92(16.6) 0.97°
Nickel 37.8 (53.8) 42.7(94.8) 23.9(28.1)° generally 5 to 15 percent of dry solids. These concen-
Selenium 2.8(1.5) 52(7.3) 0.39d trations stem from the use of coagulants in the water ;
treatment process and may be higher when a specdic
Strontium 84.3(60.6) 240d coagulant is overdosed.The aluminum content of WTP ;
vanadium 35.4(17.4) 80d residuals treated with alum is similar to aluminum con- .
Zinc 1,047.4(3,036.1)1,201.9(1,554.4) 56.5(37.2)° centrations in soils. The speciation of aluminum or iron
'Data are arithmetic mean and standard deviation()presented as in WTP residuals, however, is different from that occur-
mg/kg dry weight. ring in native soils. While soils contain significant con-
b Survey of 12 land-applied WTP residuals,including 10 alum and 2 centrations of aluminum in the form of aluminosilicates,
ferric(Brobst, 1994). WTP residuals contain aluminum(or iron)in amorphous
`U.S.EPA, 1990a.
d Shacidette and Boemgen, 1984. hydrous oxide forms, which exhibit greater reactivity t.
•Holmgren et al., 1993. than the corresponding soils materials.The various alu-
minum forms, however, quickly convert to the stable
weight. Both values are representative of agricultural aluminum oxides away from aluminum hydroxides, and '
soils but are much lower than those found in sewage do not exhibit reactivity. t
sludge. WTP residuals are similar to fine-textured soil. Moderate applications of WTP residuals may improve 3
Elliott et al. (1990a) reported no coliform organisms in
alum or ferric WTP residuals. This absence may be the physical condition, or filth, of soils by flocculating
colloidal particles, thereby promoting soil aggregation t
attributed to clean raw water, disinfection processes via reactions that are analogous to those occurring dun- -
during treatment, and/or lagoon storage of residuals ing water treatment. The hydrous metal oxides Con-
over long periods. In a waste stream recycling study tained in WTP residuals are strong adsorbents of trace
(Comwell and Lee, 1994), however, i a and Cryp- metals and phosphorus. In terms of trace metals,this is I.
tosporidium were found to concentratea in n the sedimen- beneficial to soils and results in a decreased and buff=
ration basin residuals. The study did not examine the ered concentration of free trace metals. Elliott et al.
issues of the viability and persistence of these patho- (1990b) concluded that in the case of soils treated with
gens,nor did it discuss the survival of pathogens in WTP WTP residuals, soluble aluminum usually decreases,
residuals over time. and the level of the dithionite-citrate-bicarbonate(DCB)1
WTP residuals largely consist of materials that are re- extractable aluminum residuals is typically elevated over
moved from water before its distribution.Coagulant ad- original levels but remains within the range normally
dition can enhance turbidity removal and contribute to observed for native soils (see Table 8-1). The amor-
the quantity of residuals.Depending on the quality of the phous hydrous oxides in alum-treated WTP residuals
intake water,the final residuals can be clay-like or sand- may also benefit coarse soils by increasing the cation
like in texture,which may become important in choosing exchange capacity, particularly at the neutral or slightly
the final use.WTP residuals by their nature are usually
low value fertilizer, as can be seen in Table 8-2. The I DCB is an extracting solution that removes the more reactive fraction
concentration of aluminum or iron in WTP residuals is of the total iron and aluminum present in a substance.
138

-lkaline soil pH that can increase the nutrient holding 1o0
capacity. so
8.2.2 Effects of Trace Metals Concentrations 60 \
on Soil Properties ` \
70
Trace metals in most WTP residuals
originate from co-. 60 \ \
agulant chemicals and or the water source.These met- 0
io \ .••••
als are strongly adsorbed to the aluminum hydroxide or m so j ?? ••••••01,
•
ferric hydroxide precipitates formed duringthe coagula- !••••• \ ••. \ '••••-
9 40 !••••• �••••• •••••• \ ••••••
tion process. Concentrations of trace metals will likely o •••••• ••••••• ••••••• ••••••
determine the lifetime application ~ •••••• •!••••• ••••••• •
••••••
pp cation of water treatment 30 •••••• ••••••• •••••• ,•••••
•residuals (metric tons per hectare, dry weight) on agri- !••••• •!••••• ••••••• •••••_ •.�..
cultural soils. 20 ,••• •••• i•�•,• •�•'•
Elliott et al. (1990a) assessed potential metal mobility 10 %
under field conditions using a five-step fractionation pro-
cedure.Most heavy metals in WTP residuals are bound Cd Cr CuN Pb
•
in forms not readily released into solution due to their le �'
strong adsorption and coprecipitation by aluminum (Al) ygable
and iron (Fe) hydroxides freshly formed in the coagula, ® '���Bound`� Fe-Mn Oxide Bound
lion treatment step. From 76 to 87 percent of the chro-
mium (Cr), copper(Cu), nickel (Ni), lead (Pb), and zinc Definitions:
(Zn) examined were bound within an oxide or silicate 1. Exchangeable: 16 mL 1M MgC12(pH 7.0);shake time, 1 hr.
matrix. Less than 6 percent of the total concentration of 2.Dilute acid extractable: 16 mL 1M NaOAc adjusted to pH 5.0
each of these metals was in the exchangeable fraction, With HOAc shake time,5 hrs.
which is considered to represent the easily available , 3.Fe-Mn oxide bound:40 mL of o.175M(NH4) 04 and 0.1M
metal pool. If soil conditions should become acidic (pH H2C204;shake time,4 hrs.
less tha 25 cent of the residuals a'Organically bound:40 mL of 0.1M Na4P207;shake time,24 hrs.
Cadmium Could �ECnme mnhilo 5. Residuals:Dry 0.1 g of material remaining after 9/.Add 4 mL
HNO3, 1 mL HC104 and 6 mL of HF,heat at 140°C for 3.5 hrs.
Greenhouse pot studies showed that with the more Add 5.0 g Boric acid and dilute to 100 mL volume.
acidic aluminum-based WTP residuals,application rates Figure 8-2. Partitioning of trace metals in WTP residuals(after
of 20 and 25 g/kg increased the cadmium concentration Elliott et al., 1990a).
of plant tissue to greater than 2 mg/kg (Heil and Bar-
barick, 1989). Figure 8-2 illustrates the partitioning of in available phosphorus occurs because of the large
trace metals in WTP residuals.For example,most chro- amounts of aluminum and iron hydroxide solids present
mium is released upon dissolution of Al(OH)3(s) and in WTP residuals. These hydroxides are strong adsor-
bents of inorganic phosphorus and contain only low
Fe(OH)3(s) (i.e., the iron-manganese oxide-bound frac-
tion), whereas a very small portion of chromium is re- concentrations of phosphorus.This phosphorus-limiting
leased in the acid-soluble fraction. Similar results can characteristic of WTP residuals is illustrated in Figure 8-3.
be obtained for other trace metals. Soil pH conditions
are critical in preventing the dissolution of AI(OH)34) or Greenhouse studies found phosphorus deficiencies in
other hydrous metal oxides; if nonacidic soil conditions sorghum-sudangrass were possible when application
exist, trace metals will be tightly bound, rendering them rates of aluminum- or iron-based WTP residuals ex-
immobile and unavailable for plant uptake.Therefore,in ceeded 10 g/kg soil or approximately 22.5 mt/ha (Heil,
1988; Heil and Barbarick, 1989). The study also found
the case of moderate WTP residuals application rates
(20 dry mt/ha)and properly managed soils (pH greater that both alum-and iron-based WTP residuals decrease
than 6.0),movement of metals into ground water or into the availability of phosphorus but can effectively in-
plant tissues can be minimized. crease iron availability in iron-deficient soil.WTP residu-
als applied at a rate of 60 g/kg or approximately 135
8.23 Impact of Water Treatment Residuals mt/ha, produced phosphorus deficiencies in tomato
on the Availability of Phosphorus In plants (Elliott and Singer, 1988).
Agricultural Soils
This reduction in plant-available phosphorus is qualita-
Because phosphate deficiency greatly affects agricul- tively different from the toxicity problem that
tural soil fertility, much research has been conducted may be associated with lapndential
residu-
into the decreased availability of phosphorus in soils : als.The depletion of plant-availilable phosphorusplication of neces-
following the addition of WTP residuals. This decrease sitates the addition of supplemental phosphorus
139

5 than mature plants do;therefore,deep injection(greater
than 18 cm) may be preferable at this growth stage.
When residuals are applied to the soil surface, the re-
4 _ sulting drying action decreases the surface area of the
aluminum and iron hydroxides,and organic matter in the
surface litter will localize the adsorption sites for phos-
phorus. This may in fact be beneficial in areas of high
m s - naturally occurring phosphates,and WTP residuals may
be able to reduce phosphorus loadings to surface wa-
t= ters by adsorbing the phosphorus. In addition, in areas
a2 ! in which stormwater runoff carries excess phosphorus
to lakes and streams, WTP residuals could be used to
bind excess phosphorus and improve the runoff water
quality.
.
o I to I 20 I Crops may be selected that tend to use labile phospho-
s 15 25 rus rather than just soluble phosphorus.Large quantities
WTP Residuals Application Rate(g/kg)
Average Alum of phosphorus fertilizer are applied in close proximity to
o Average Iron seeds to accommodate the phosphorus requirements of
Figure 8-3. Average(of three cuttings)phosphorus concentra- seedlings.Sewage sludge contains significant amounts
tion in sorghum-sudangrass grown In Colby loll of phosphorus that can add to total soil phosphorus.
(after Heil and Barbarick,1989). Several Colorado facilities have studied the coapplica-
tion of both sewage sludge and WTP residuals to miti-
fertilizer to obtain optimal plant yields.This is a manage- gate the effects of phosphorus adsorption by WTP
ment problem rather than a public health issue; there- residuals. The experiments have met with varying de-
fore,the problem is easy to correct with either adjusted grees of success in the short evaluation periods, how-
management practices or additional phosphorus fertilizer. ever, they have shown that the assumption of
phosphorus being bound on a one-to-one molar basis,
Soluble phosphorus levels are commonly determined by as required by state regulations, may be conservative.
the equilibrium phosphorus concentration (EPC) test
(White, 1981). The EPC is the concentration of phos- In the case of excessively fertilized soils, phosphorus
phorus at which no adsorption or desorption of phospho- adsorption by WTP residuals may be agriculturally ad-
rus occurs. The phosphate buffer capacity (PBC) vantageous. WTP residuals applied to high phosphorus
provides information about the response of a soil to soils can produce a lower EPC for optimal crop growth.
fertilization, specifically whether the added phosphorus
will be adsorbed by the soil or will remain in the soil 8.2.4 Effects of WTP Residuals on Soil
solution and be available for plant uptake. Elliott et al. Physical Properties
(1990b) used both EPC and PBC techniques to investi- Research has been conducted to determine whether
gate the incremental amount of phosphorus fertilizer application of WTP residuals conditions agricultural soils
that should be applied to soils treated with WTP residu- by increasing the soil organic matter content.Soil con-
als to obtain good plant growth. ditioning is treatment that modifies a soil's physical prop-
The typical range of EPC values for optimal production erties for the improvement of crop growth (Chang et al.,
is 50 to 200 µg/L EPC. Between 50 and 100 of the triple 1983).The organic matter content of dry WTP residuals
superphosphate (TSP) fertilizer used in this study is varies depending on the original raw water source and
conventionally added to agricultural soils to maintain the treatment methods employed at individual WTPs.
crop production (White, 1981). Farmers usually apply Estimates of percent organic matter in WTP residuals
nitrogen and potassium fertilizers to agricultural soils in range from 14.4 percent(Lin, 1988)to 25 to 35 percent
addition to various pesticides. Therefore, the cost of (Bugbee and Rink, 1985).These values seem high and
restoring.the EPC after residuals application should be a should be used with caution. Appropriate methods for
fraction of the entire cost of preparing a soil for planting. determining organic matter in WTP residuals should be -
used. Current research in this field(Elliott et al., 1990a)
Application techniques may be used to mitigate the determined that the average organic matter content of
impact of WTP residuals on the availability of phospho- seven test residuals was 3 percent,with an average loss
rus in agricultural soils. WTP residuals can be applied on ignition (LOI) value of 33 percent. Thus, the soil
to the top soil layers or injected below the surface, conditioning effects of organic matter in WTP residuals
depending on the growth stage of specific crops. Seed- are probably quite small and may not be measurable
lings generally have higher phosphorus requirements under field conditions.
140

pit a land application site in Colorado with cumulative porosity of tight soils, rendering the soils more workable
plication rates of up to 179 mt/ha (80 tons/acre) (by for agricultural purposes.
1984) researchers theorized that the cumulative load- The best way to estimate the liming requirement of a soil
ngs of quartz and aluminum hydroxides exhibited some
potential to change soil texture in fields near an Indus- is to titrate individual samples of the soil with a standard
trial water treatment facility (King et al., 1988). The base.The result is the quantity of base required to raise
annual application rate was approximately 45 mt/ha(20 the pH of the soil to a specified pH. The theoretical
tons/acre). Soils on the fields amended with alum re- chemical process is illustrated below:
siduals have shown a potential for dusting and more CaCO3+ H2O =Ca2++ HCO3-+OH-
rapid drying than the nonamended fields. Application
rates were lowered to control this situation. Ten mmoles of a base per kilogram consumed during
titration is equivalent to 4.5 metric tons of pure CaCO3
8.3 Land Application Options per hectare at a 30-cm plough layer (ha-30 cm) of the
sample soil.
8.3.1 Agricultural Land Field liming results may differ considerably from these
experimental results, depending on the mixing of lime
Agricultural use of WTP residuals is the beneficial appli- residuals with the soil, the solubility of the liming agent,
cation or disposal of residuals on agronomic lands.Suc- and the soil sampling procedures. Use of a conversion
cessful implementation of this disposal option requires factor generally corrects this difference. The U.S. De-
an understanding of the effects of WTP residuals on soil partment of Agriculture's Extension Service may be con-
fertility and physical properties (discussed in the pre- suited for the appropriate conversion factor for a given area
vious section). The physical characteristics of soil that
determine whether it can support vegetative growth in- Lime residuals can be applied as a liquid or dewatered
dude cohesion, aggregation, strength, and texture. and applied as a cake using an agricultural manure
These parameters directly affect the hydraulic proper- spreader.The application rate for lime residuals must be
ties of a soil,such as moisture-holding capacity, infiltra- calculated on a dry weight basis, then converted to the
tion, permeability,and drainage.Any adverse impact on equivalent wet weight for application to the farm field.
these hydraulic soil characteristics from land-applied
WTP residuals can effect crop growth and ultimately 8.3.12 Alum Residuals
•
degrade ground water quality(Elliott et al., 1990b). Alum residuals when dry generally have the consistency
Concentrations of the WTP residuals listed in Table 8-1 of very fine soils.Bugbee and Frink(1985) indicate that
tend to be elevated compared with the concentration of alum residuals improve the physical characteristics of
trace metals described in Chapter 3. Many of the sam- soil media but inhibit plant growth by adsorbing phos-
pled WTPs in Colorado treat surface waters affected by phorus. As stated earlier, this reduction in phosphorus
past mining activities. The length of time a site may be available to plants is different from the toxicity problem
used depends on the quality of the WTP residuals ap- that may be associated with land application of WTP
plied. Two basic types of residuals are generated at a residuals. To obtain optimal plant yields when land ap-
WTP—lime softening residuals and coagulant (alum or plying alum residuals, phosphorus fertilizer must be added.
ferric) residuals.These residuals are discussed below. As previously mentioned, soil conditioning effects from
organic matter in WTP residuals are probably quite
8.3.1.1 Lime Softening Residuals small and may not be measurable under field conditions..
Addition of lime to agricultural soil is a common practice Management practices such as lowering application
in areas where the soil pH is too low for optimal plant rates can control the dusting and rapid drying seen in
growth; lime modifies the balance between acidity and fields amended with alum residuals.Application of alum
alkalinity in the soil.Soil pH should be maintained at 6.5 residuals at rates that are not considered excessive(20
or above to minimize crop uptake of metals (U.S. EPA, mt/ha)does not cause environmental degradation.Alum
1983). In addition to providing a desirable pH for plant residuals are applied as a liquid unless the WTP has
growth,lime residuals can be substituted for agricultural dewatering capabilities. Liquid alum residuals can be
limestone and offer calcium carbonate equivalence applied with a liquid manure spreader, like lime residu-
. (CCE) or neutralization effectiveness. Lime residuals als, or with conventional irrigation equipment.
can be dewatered to higher solids content than alum Example 1:Co-disposal With Sewage Sludge
residuals can; therefore, the potential for unique dis-
posal or co-disposal opportunities is greater than for Colorado in the late 1980s developed a WTP residuals
other residuals. Studies show the neutralizing power of land application policy based on research completed in
lime residuals is equal or superior to that of agricultural northeastern Colorado. This approach assumed that
limestone(Che et al.,1988).Lime residuals increase the aluminum and iron would bind with the phosphorus in
141

the WTP residuals on a one-to-one basis. Because of applied at rates above agronomic rates,with the excep-
this potential phosphorus binding effect, Colorado de- tion of reclamation projects and when authorized by the
veloped a conservative method of estimating the frac- permitting authority."
tion of WTP residuals that can be coapplied with sewage
When calculating the agronomic rate,note that soil data
sludge. That method is described in Equation 8-1.
are required to determine the amount of nitrogen
P(SS)—1.15 Al(SS)— needed for a specific crop.Therefore,for dry land farm-
WTP residual_ 0.55 Fe(SR) ing, deep soil monitoring should be conducted once
fraction [1.15AI(WTR)— 1.15 AI(SR)]+ every 5 years, with samples collected at 1-foot intervals
[0.55 Fe(WTR)—0.55 Fe(SR)] for a total of 5 feet. For irrigated farm land, samples
should be collected within the plow zone on an annual
(Eq. 8-1) basis. If soil data are not available, residual nitrogen
where from previous sewage sludge applications can be deter-
P(SS) = phosphorus content (mg/kg) in sewage mined using the mineralization rate of organic nitrogen.
sludge Annual soil tests, however, provide a more accurate
Al(SS) = aluminum content (mg/kg) in sewage estimate of the nitrogen content of the soil. Because an
sludge individual soil sample may not provide an accurate de-
Fe(SS) = iron content (mg/kg) in sewage sludge termination for an entire land area, multiple soil samples
AI(WTR) = aluminum content (mg/kg) in WTP should be taken from different locations within the field.
residuals
Fe(WTR) = iron content (mg/kg) in WTP residuals Example 2:Land Application With Supplemental
For example, if Phosphorus
P(SS) = 25,000 mg/kg (average value from U.S. Fertilizer recommendations are specific to crop,climate,
EPA, 1995) soil type, and yield goals. Therefore, this option is dis-
Al(SS) = 8,000 mg/kg (typical value) cussed only generally.
Fe(SS) = 15,000 mg/kg (typical value)
AI(WTR) = 60,111 mg/kg (average value from Table Generally,the phosphorus(P)soil test rates soils as low,
8-1) medium, high, and very high with respect to available
Phosphorus.Thus,the soil test is interpretive ratherthan
Fe(WTR) = 52,751 mg/kg (average value from Table
8-1) purely analytical. For soils with low available phospho-
rus, as indicated by the test, good agricultural practice
then, the WTP residuals fraction = is to add significantly more phosphorus than the crop
25,000 m9 P— 1.15 me Al)— needs. This extra phosphorus is added to compensate
(15,000 (8,000 Fe) for the phosphorus-depleting effects of land-applied
[1.15(60,11t 0.55(g AI)— 1.15 (8,000 Al)] alum/iron residuals in addition to the intrinsically low
g 4] phosphorus availability. For soils rated as medium,
[0.55(52,751 mc4 Fe)—0.55(15,000 9 Fe)] slightly more phosphorus should be added tharrthe crop
= 0.193 demands. Soils rated as high in phosphorus need none
added;however,enough phosphorus fertilizer should be
The values used in this example are only for demonstra- added to compensate for any phosphorus depletion occur-
tion purposes. Because each WTP residual and sewage ring due to the presence of alum/iron residuals in the soil.sludge has different qualities,the most current data from
a given treatment plant should be used. It should be For example, assume that the phosphorus demand for
noted that Colorado is no longer using this method and WTP residuals applied at 1 mt/ha is equivalent to 98.13
has been evaluating land application requests on a kg/ha (196.26 lb/acre). Also, the soil test indicated that
case-by-case basis. soil phosphorus demand is 15 mg/kg. Using Table 8-3's
The result of this equation and agronomic information figures for a wheat crop:
for the sewage sludge can be used to determine a land • Phosphorus demand from the alum/iron residuals =
application rate for residuals. If the nitrogen in a WTP 98.1 kg/ha.
residual is higher than expected (higher than in Table • Phosphorus required to satisfy the crop need (from
8-2),the nitrogen content must also be used in calculat- the table) = 19.5 kg/ha.
ing the agronomic rate. The agronomic rate of sewage the table) = 19.5 kg/ha.
sludge is the amount needed to supply the recom- Therefore,
without
mendedallowing amount excess of nitronitrogengen (N) to migrate for a parti
igate1cular below the crop
• Estimated soil demand for phosphorus = 5 kg/ha.
root zore and into the ground water. According to 40 The total supplemental phosphorus required for this
CFR Part 503.14.d, "Bulk sewage sludge shall not be example is 132.6 kg/ha (265 lb/acre), with the alumriron
142

pl.We 8-3. Phosphorus Recommendations for Several
Agronomic Crops'(Foth and Ellis, 1988) restore or enhance soil productivity. Disturbed lands
Phosphorus Applied k include highway construction sites, overgrazed ran-
gelands,gelands, and other construction sites. In combination
Soil P Test with other fertilizers,however,WTP residuals may bene-
mglkg Corn wheat Soybeans Potatoes fit reclamation efforts. WTP residuals can be used to
15 15(30) 19.5 (39) 11 (22) (76) treat a particular or site-specific concern. For example,
lime residuals can control soil pH just as they do in
30 6.5(13) 11 (22) 0 35(70) agriculture, but in these cases the pH adjustment may
50 0 0 0 30.5(s1) be more critical because mine soils can be very low in
pH. In addition, alum residuals can control runoff of
so 0 0 0 24(as)
excess phosphate into surface waters. Care must be
175 0 0 0 0
taken to ensure that the site is suitable for use of WTP
a Yield goals assumed: corn, 140 bushels/acre; wheat, 70 bushels/ residuals and that controls(best management practices)
acre;soybeans,50 bushels/acre;potatoes,400 cwdacre.
. are in place to protect public health and the environment
residuals applied at 1 mt/ha. Again, the assumptions
ran-
made here are for illustration purposes only; the WTP Application rates may vary from 5 mt/ha on and must modify this information to reflect local conditions. geland to 450 mit/ha or higher on a mineland reclamation
site. On a mineland reclamation site, WTP residuals
8.3.2 Silviculture may actually be used as a topsoil replacement;thus,the
application rate may be as high as 450 mt/ha.
Silviculture, another agricultural practice, is the estab-
•
lishment, growth, reproduction, and care of forest trees
as a crop.Land application of both wastewater and WTP 8.3.4 Dedicated Land Disposal
residuals is relatively uncommon in silviculture com-
pared with application to agricultural lands. Bugbee and
Frink (1985) indicated the following effects of residuals Dedicated land disposal(DLD)of WTP residuals is gen- "
application to silvicultural use: no significant effects on erally the alternative chosen by those operations that
tree growth, nutrient levels, or the appearance of the either generate residuals continuously or have quantity
forest floor, slightly diminished uptake of phosphorus; or quality concerns. DLDs are designed to treat and
dispose of large quantities of residuals through soil mi-
and increased soil pH for trees treated with WTP residu- croorganisms,sunlight,and/or oxidation.In addition,the
als. Grabarek and Krug (1987) concluded that limited
soils are used to bind or fix the metals,thus making them
application of WTP residuals to a healthy forested area
does not upset the phosphate cycle to the point of unavailable.
affecting forest growth patterns.
A distinct advantage to using a DLD is that,for the most "The effects of long-term(30 months)application of alum part,the WTP controls the application times, rather than
residuals were evaluated by Geertsema et al. (1994). other factors(e.g.,crop growth cycles). DLD application
Alum residuals were applied to experimental plots with rates are generally much higher than those of other land
two to four replicates of each application rate:0,36,and application operations,ranging from 20 mt/ha to greater
52 mt/ha (0, 16, and 23 dry tons per acre). The study than 200 mt/ha.This increased application rate can greatly
found no statistically significant differences in soil char- decrease the amount of land required for the WTP.acteristics, ground-water characteristics,or loblolly pine
growth analyses between the unamended and the re- The tradeoff between DLDs and other land application
siduals-amended plots. Geertsema et al. also found no options is that stricter requirements generally apply to
significant metal migration through the soil profile.At the the DLDs. Increased application rates require that the
application rate used in the study, no problems were site be carefully designed, managed, and monitored.
observed in available phosphorus as evidenced by the The site must be designed to contain any of the residual
similar pine tree growth in the treated and untreated constituents that might threaten public health or the
plots.The results of the study did not indicate any envi- environment.The site must take more care with surface
ronmental problems; therefore, the City of Newport runoff controls and the generation of contaminated
News has implemented a full-scale project, leachate or infiltration.Generally,surface water controls
include physical structures such as dikes, ditches, and
8.3.3 Land Reclamation lagoons. Control of leachate that is generated may re-
quire collection and treatment prior to discharge or dis-
5ewage sludge is more commonly used than WTP re-
d leaha may require a
riduals to reclaim surface-mined areas or other dis- National Pollutant Discharge Ele of the imination System(NPDES)
urbed lands and to establish vegetative growth and/or permit and/or additional state permits.
143

•
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT
AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
MEMORANDUM
TO: Joe Pearce, Engineer
DWQ Non-Discharge Permit Group
THROUGH: Larry D. Coble pi--
3�c
Water Quality Supervisor
FROM: David Russell-PAL
Environmental Specialist WSRO
SUBJECT: Town of Madison
Residual Solids Permit Application No. WQ0015918
Rockingham County
The subject application for applying water plant sludge to town property does not contain
maps of the proposed sites. In addition, no application rates for the sludge was included. Even
though this is water plant sludge, basic information for application of the sludge must be
provided.
Until additional information is provided by the applicant, the regional office cannot
recommend approval of a permit.
cc: 411WRO..-
Central Files
'U,

State of North Carolina
Department.of Environment
and Natural Resources VC/11Y1114A
Division of Water Quality f
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary NCDENR
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAI 'bIJP F )
September 30, 1998 N.C. s
Mr. Michael C. Brooks,Administrator G O T ,. 7 i
Town of Madison 120 North Market Street rli t, F Ta m
Madison ,NC 27025 - . •
✓
Subject: Application No. v (-mice
Town of Madison
Other Residual Solids
Rockingham County
Dear Mr. Brooks:
The Division's Permits and Engineering Unit acknowledges receipt of your permit application and
supporting materials on September 28, 1998. This application has been assigned the number listed above.
Your project has been assigned to Mr.Joe Pearce for a detailed engineering review. Should there be any
questions concerning your project,the reviewer will contact you with a request for additional information.
Be aware that the Division's Regional Office,copied below, must provide recommendations from the
Regional Supervisor or a Procedure Four Evaluation for this project,prior to final action by the division.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Joe Pearce at 919/733-5083 ext. 544. If the engineer is
unavailable,you may leave a message on their voice mail and they will respond promptly.
PLEASE REFER TO rap.;ABOVE APPLICATION NUMBER WHEN MAKING INQUIRES ON
THIS PROJECT.
Sincerely,
(EY\Mr. Kim H. Colson,P.E.
Supervisor,Non-Discharge Permitting Unit
cc:
Dewberry&Davis C — 2
ASSIGNED•
DUE CIA ....
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/10%post-consumer paper

A v' State. of North Carolina J�C
• . ./ 'Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management RECEIVED
Non-Discharge Permit Application Form
WATER QUALITY SECTION
(THIS FORM MAY BE PHOTOCOPIED FOR USE AS AN ORIGINAL) . SEP 2 8 1996
DISTRIBUTION OF OTHER RESIDUAL SOLIDSNona harge Permitting
This application is intended for facilities which are EXEMPT from 40 CFR Part 5U
I. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Applicant's name(please specify the name of the municipality,corporation,individual, etc.):
Town of Madison
2. Print owners or signing official's name and title(the person who is legally responsible for the facility and its compliance):
Michael C. Brooks, Administrator
3. Mailing address: 120 North Market Street
City: Madison State: NC Zip: 27025
Telephone Number: ( 336 ) 427-0221
4. Application Date: July 17, 1998
5. Fee Submitted: $ 400.00 [The permit processing fee should be as specified in 15A NCAC 2H.0205(c)(5).)
6. Specify how these residuals will be distributed: sold or given away in bags or other containers; X lawn(bulk);
x home garden (bulk): X other, distributed over new park area and seeded as cover
7. If the alternative for residual disposal consists of"surface disposal" as defined under 40 CFR Part 503, please complete the
application titled "SURFACE DISPOSAL OF RESIDUAL. SOLIDS. Please identify if there is any storage of residuals in
a surface impoundment or disposal thru landfilling. Explain:
S. Is the residual process facility also the generator? X Yes; No
9. Latitude: 36° 22' 45" Longitude: - 79° 59' 04" of residual process facility
10. Specify whether the process facility is owned by: federal;. pnvate; state; X local government;
11. County where facility is located: Rockingham
•
I. PERMIT INFORMATION: nn
1. Application No. (will be comp �,IJ�.
competed by DEM): W 1 5`1,i
2. Specify whether project is: X new; renewal*; modification
For renewals, complete all sections included in the application. Engineering Signature and Seal not required for
renewals or if there is not any construction involved with the subject project.
3. If this application is being submitted as a result of a renewal or modification to an existing permit_ list the existing permit
number and its issue date
.ORM1: DORS 06/94 Pa2c I of 7

,
III. FACILITY INFORMATION (attach additional pages for additional sources of residuals):
:. ;,f facilit—:.`..:. rasiduals are generated or prepared: Town of Madison, Water Treatment Plan}
2. Facility permit number: NC0085626 ;facility permit holder: Town of Madison
3. Specify whether facility in Section III.1 is owned by: federal; private; state; X local government;
4. Specify facility design flow: 1.5 mgd; facility average daily flow: 0.583 mgd;
Type of residual storage: sediment beds for river sediment and alum: __ sludge
Volume of residual storage: 1600 CY/572.5 dry tons •
Length of residuals storage at facility: 4,745 days (the Division requires a minimum 30 days storage in units that
are separate from treatment system, i.e.not in clarifiers,aeration basins, etc.);
Estimated volume of residuals: 44.04 (dry tons/yr.);
5. If the residual process facility is not the same as the generator,please specify delivery frequency and quantity of residual to
be processed:
6. Facility contact(person familiar with residuals preparation): Willie Amburn
7. Facility contact's telephone number: ( 336 ) 427-3971
Lindsey Bridge Road
E. Location of treatment facility: Madison, NC State; Rockingham County
9. Mailing address: Town of Madison, WTP 120 North Market Street
Madison, NC 27025
10. Specify the source of the residuals: X treatment of water (alum sludges); treatment of industrial wastewater
(100% industrial residuals); treatment of industrial wastewater mixed with domestic wastewater (please specify
appropriate percentages of %industrial wastewater, %domestic wastewater);
other(explain): facility draws directly from river, large amount of river sediment
Attach an explanation of either the treatment process, manufacturing process. or how the waste is generated. Provide full
and complete details of the entire process.
11. Does the facility which generates the residuals have an approved pretreatment program? Yes; X No.
This includes facilities which are classified as a"Class I" facility (any publicly owned treatment works required. under 40
CFR 403.8, to have an approved pretreatment program or any facility treating domestic sewage that is classified as "Class
I" the appropriate federal or State authority)
V. RESIDUALS INFORMATION (attach additional pages for additional sources of residuals):
1. Information for Hazardous Waste (RCRA) Determination. The information requested on the limitations specified below
pertain only to those residuals that are generated from a municipal wastewater treatment facility with industrial contribution
or active pretreatment program and from any other treatment facility with wastewater sources that include industrial sources.
a. Are any of the residuals covered by this application listed in 40 CFR 261.31-261.33? Yes; X No. If Yes,
list the number(s):
b. Do the residuals exhibit any of the four characteristics defined by 40 CFR 261.21-261.24? Yes: X No.
Attach laboratory results for the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure Analyses, Reactivity, Ignitability, and
Corrosivity for each residual.
-ORM1: DORS 06/94 Pape 2 of 7

4
. rote:• If the following constituent levels(as determined by the Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure Analyses)arc
' exceeded in the residuals or if the pH of the residual is not within the range listed below, the residual is b.
definition a Hazardous waste. Chemical analyses must be made to Minimum Detection Levels.
PPM PPM
Arsenic 5.0 Barium 100.0
Benzene 0.5 Cadmium 1.0
Carbon tetrachloride 0.5 Chlordane 0.03
Chlorobenzene 100.0 Chloroform 6.0
Chromium 5.0 o-Cresol 200.0
m-Cresol 200.0 p-Cresol 200.0
Cresol 200.0 2,4-D 10.0
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 7.5 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.5
1,1-Dichloroethylene 0.7 2,4-Dinitrotoluene 0.13
Endrin 0.02 Heptachlor(and its hydroxide) 0.008
Hexachlorobenzene 0.13 Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene 0.5
Hexachloroethane 3.0 Lead 5.0
Lindane 0.4 Mercury 0.2
Methexychlor 10.0 Methyl ethyl ketone 200.0
Nitrobenzene 2.0 Pentachlorophenol 100.0
Pyridine 5.0 Selenium 1.0
Silver 5.0 Tetrachloroethylene 0.7
Toxaphene 0.5 Trichloroethylene 0.5
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 400.0 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 2.0
2,4,5-TP (Silvex) 1.0 Vinyl chloride 0.2
pH (2:1 voliwt): >2.0 s.u. - <12.5 s.u.
NOTE: IF ANY OF THE RESIDUALS MEET THE DEFINITIONS OF A HAZARDOUS WASTE,
AS NOTED IN EITHER "A" OR "B" ABOVE, A PERMIT CANNOT BE ISSUED FOR
THAT MATERIAL AND IT SHOULD NOT BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THIS
APPLICATION.
2. For each residual,please attach a complete chemical analysis of the material. This analysis must be comprehensive enough
to completely characterize the residual and must be based upon a review of the process that generates the material. If the
facility that will generate the residual is not yet in operation, the characterization must be based on similar existing
facilities and projection based on the type of facility. The analysis must include a minimum of the following parameters
and any other 11owr,,and suspected contaminants that are tributary to the system.
Cadmium Aluminum pH
Copper Ammonia-Nitrogen Phosphorus
Lead Calcium Potassium
Nickel Magnesium Sodium
Zinc Nitrate-Nitrite Nitrogen TKN
Total Solids Plant Available Nitrogen(by calculation) - N/A
3. Wastewater residuals can not be sold or given away if the concentration of any pollutant in the residuals exceeds the ceiling
concentrations specified in the table below. Specify the pollutant concentration of these residuals(attach lab analysis):
Pollutant Pollutant Ceiling Concentration (mg/kg) Pollutant Concentration (mg/kg)
Dry Weight Basis Dry Weight Basis
Cadmium 85 0.3
_
Copper 4300 37
Lead 840 16_
Nickel 420 20
Zinc I 7500 95
'ORMM: DORS 06/94 Pane 3 of 7

•
4 Provide, all applicable pilot studies and any bench scale tests performed on each residual source and the results, includin_,
the approximate fertilizer equivalent. N/A the alum residual is not being used as fertilizer.
It is being used as a soil amendment.
5. Wastewater residuals can't be sold or given away in bags or other containers for application to the land unless one of the
following options is satisfied.
A Specify either A or B. Please be advised. if the residuals are to be sold or given away in bulk for application tc
lawn or home garden then Option A is the only option.
A . The pollutant concentration of the residuals must be less than Pollutant Monthly Average Concentrations
listed in the table below.
•
Monthly Average Concentrations Pollutant Concentration
Pollutant Dry Weight Basis (mg/kg) Dry Weight Basis (mg/kg)
Cadmium 39 0.3
Copper 1500 37
Lead 300 16
Nickel 420 20
Zinc 2800 95
B. The product of the concentration of each pollutant in the residual and the annual whole residual application
rate for the residual shall not cause the Annual Pollutant Loading Rate to be exceeded.
In order for the Annual Whole Residual Application Rate (AWRAR) to be calculated the Annual Pollutant
Loading Rate (APLR) is divided by the pollutant concentration (PC) times 0.001 (a conversion factor) as
follows:
AWRAR= APLR
PC * 0.001
Pollutant Annual Pollutant Annual Whole Residual
Pollutant Concentration Loading Rates Application Rate
Dry Weight Basis (APLR) (AWRAR)
(mg/kg) kg/hectare kg/hectare
Cadmium 1 .9
Copper 75
Lead 15
Nickel 21
Zinc 140
The AWRAR for the residual is the lowest AWRAR calculated. This is the maximum rate at which the
subject residual can be applied (to convert kg/hectare to lbs/acre multiply by 0.8924). Please specify
ke/hectare or lbs/acre:
AWRAR =
. PATHOGEN REDUCTION INFORMATION (attach add. pages for additional sources of residuals)
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0200, pathogen reduction can be achieved using, either 40 CFR Part 257 or 40 CFR Part
503. Since the pathogen reduction requirements found in 40 CFR Part 257 (note, "Processes to Further Reduce Pathogens" or
PFRP) are incorporated into 40 CFR Part 503, only Part 503 is listed below. Please check which of the following applies to
the subject residual:
FORM: DORS 06/94 Pace 4 of 7

I
1. In order for the residuals to be Class A, in accordance with the pathogen requirements in 40 CFR 503.32(a),tither Part a or
Part b and one of the options in Part c must be completed (please submit all lab analysis,test results and calculations):
X a. A Fecal coliform density less than 1000 Most Probable Number per gram of total dry solids,or
b. A Salmonella sp. density less than 3 Most Probable Number per 4 grams of total dry solids.
c. In addition to Part a or Part b being met,one of the following alternatives must also be completed. Please
specify 1,2, 3, 4, 5a, 5b,5c, 5d, 5e, 5f, 5g or 6 below being met
1. nme/tern,'erature - an increased residuals temperature should be maintained fur a prescribed period of time, in
accordance with the following guidelines. The results (D) shall be the amount of time, in days, that the residuals
shall remain at the given temperature: .
Time and Temperature Guidelines
Total Solids Temperature (t) Minimum Time E°uation Notes •
No heating of small
> or=7% > or=50° C >or= 20 minutes D= 131.700.000 particles by warmed
100.14 t gases or immiscible
liquid.
> or=7% > or= 50° C >or= 15 seconds D= 131.700.000 Small panicles heated by
100.14 t warmed gases or
immiscible liouid.
< 7% > or= 50° C >or= 15 seconds D=1,1.700.000
to 100.14 t
< 30 minutes
< 7% > or= 500 C >or= 30 minutes D= 50.070.000
100.14 t
2. alkaline treatment- the pH of the residuals is raised to greater than 12 for at least 72 hours. During this time, the
temperature of the residuals should be greater than 52° C for at least 12 hours. In addition, after the 72 hour
period, the residuals are to be air dried to at least 50% total solids.
3. prior testing for Enteric Virus/Viable Helminth Ova -the residuals are analyzed for the presence of enteric viruses
(Plaque-forming units) [pfu) and viable helminth ova. If the residuals are analyzed before the pathogen reduction
process and found to have densities of enteric virus <1 pfu/4 grams of total solids and viable helminth dva<1/4g
total solids, the residuals are Class A with respect to enteric virus and viable helminth ova until the next
monitoring episode. If the residuals are analyzed before the pathogen reduction process and found to have densities
of enteric virus > or= 1 pfu/4 g total solids or viable helminth ova>or= 1/4 g total solids, and tested again after
processing and found to meet the enteric virus and viable helminth ova levels listed under "4" below, then the
processed residuals will be Class A with respect to enteric viruses and viable helminth ova when the operating
parameters for the pathogen reduction process are monitored and shown to he consistent with the values or ranges
of values documented.
gill • • 'or testins for Enteric VirusNiable Helmin .Ova-if the residuals are not analyzed before pathogen reduction
processing for enteric viruses and viable helminth ova, the density of enteric viruses must be less than 1 pfu/4 g of
total dry solids and the density of viable helminth ova must be less than 1/4 g of total dry solids, or the residuals
must be treated by a"Process to Further Reduce Pathogens" or a"Process to Further Reduce Pathogens" equivalent
process.
5. The "Processes to Further Reduce Pathogens" (PFRP)are described as follows:
a. Composting - using either the within-vessel or static aerated pile composting methods, the temperature of the
residuals are raised to 55°C or higher for three days. Using the windrow composting method. the residuals are
raised to 55° C or higher for fifteen days. During the high temperature period, there will be a minimum of five
turnings of the windrow.
F. ORi\1: DORS 06/94 Page 5 of 7

b. kleat Drying - residuals are dried by direct or indirect contact with hot gases to reduce the moisture conterit o
the residuals to 10%or lower. Either the temperature of the gas in contact with the residuals exceeds 80°C c.
the we: h:rlh temperature of the pas in contact with the residuals. when the residuals leave the carver. exceee..
80° C.
c. Heat Treatment-liquid residuals are heated to a temperature of 180°C or higher for thirty minutes.
d. Thcrrnophilic Aerobic Digestion -liquid residuals are agitated with air or oxygen to maintain aerobic condition,
at residence times of ten days at temperatures of 55°C to 60°C.
e. eta Ray Irradiation - residuals are irradiated with beta rays from an accelerator at dosages of at least 1.0
megarad at room temperature(ca.20°C).
f. Gamma Ray Irradiation -residuals are irradiated with gamma rays from certain isotopes such as 60Co ant
137Ce at dosages of at least 1.0 megarad at room temperature(ca. 20°C).
g. Pasteurization - the temperature of the residuals is maintained at 700 C or higher for at least thirty minutes.
6. The residuals shall be treated in a process that is equivalent to a"Processes to Further Reduce Pathogens" (PFRP),
as determined by the permitting authority based on evaluations of the recommendations provided by the Pathogen
Equivalency Committee.
VI. GENERAL INFORMATION:
1. Please provide a brief narrative concerning materials handling,including the following:
a. How will the materials will be handled and transported from where the residuals were produced to where it will be
treated?
b. Where will the residuals be stored until processed? The alum sludge will be stored in the Town's alum
sludge storage basin at the Water Treatment Plant.
c. How will leachatc collection be handled? The Town's personnel will remove the sludge and
d what will be the duration of treatment? haul it in bulk to Town-owned property where it
will be immediately distributed and seeded.
e. Where will the final product be stored?
f. How long will the final product be stored before being distributed?
g. How will the final product be distributed(packaging)?
2. Please attach a marketability statement detailing destinations and approximate amounts of the final product to be
distributed. The entire amount of the final product will be used on Town—owned proprty as a
soil amendment.
3. Please provide either a label which shall be affixed to the bagged processed residual or an information sheet which shall be
provided to the person who receives the processed residual. The label or information sheet shall contain, at a minimum, the
following information:
a The name and address of the person who prepared the residual that is sold or given away in a bag or other container for
application to the land.
b. A statement that application of the residual to the land is prohibited except in accordance with the instructions on the
label or information sheet.
c. A statement that the residuals shall not be applied to any site that is flooded, frozen or snow covered_
d A statement that adequate procedures shall be provided to prevent surface runoff from carrying any disposed or stored
residuals into any surface waters.
e. Information on all applicable buffers including a 10 foot buffer between application site and any public or private water
supr]y source (including wells) and any stream. lake,river, or natural drainage way.
f. The Annual Whole Residual Application Rate(AWRAR) for the residual that does not cause any of the annual
pollutant loading rates to be exceeded(if necessary).
The Town intends to use teh entire amount of sludge. The Town does not intend to
distribute the alum sludge to the public, and therefore the information sheet is not
applicable. The Town will be held to the conditions of the permit.
FORN1: DORS 06/9.4 Pa_IC 6 of 7

Name and Complete Address of Engineering Firm: Dewberry & Davis
551 Piney Forest Road
City: Danville State: VA Zip: 24540
Telephone Number: ( 804 ) 797-4497
Professional Engineer's Certification:
I, Mike Daugherty . attest that this application for the Town of Madison —
Distribution of Other Residual Solids
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I furher attest that to the best of my knowledge
the proposed design has been prepared in accordance with the applicable regulations. Although certain portions of this submittal
package may have been developed by other professionals, inclusion of these materials under my signature and seal signifies that I have
reviewed this material and have judged it to be consistent with the proposed design.
North Carolina Professional Engineer's Seal, Signature,and Date: .os„et•,,,,,
.•`'•• ciik.N CARD(
/*- •o�ESST 54-&
:tit/
ks 15509
Applicant's Certification:
I, Michael Books, Town Manager . attest that this application for the Town of Madison —
Distribution of other Residual Solids _
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that if all required pans of this
application are not completed and that if all required supporting information-and attachments are not included, this application package
will be returned to me as incomplete.
Signature ( C Z!
Date � /4/
THE COMPLETED APPLICATION PACKAGE. INCLUDING ALL SUPPORTING INFORMATION AND
MATERIALS, SHOULD BE SENT TO THE FOLLO«LNG ADDRESS:
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
WATER QUALITY SECTION
PERMITS AND ENGINEERING UNIT
POST OFFICE 'BOX 29535
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27626-0535
TELEPHONE NUMBER: (919) 733-5083
•
'ORM: DORS Wi94 P.._� 7 of 7

•
•
Water Technology and Controls, Inc.
Environmental Laboratory
Laboratory Certification No. 165
Client: Town of Madison Report Date: 3/10/98
Contact: Mr. Mike Morrison Date Sample Rcvd: 2/2/98
WT&C Work Order# 02029806 Sample: Sludge Lagoon Grab 2/2/98
Parameters Result
%Total Solids 62.65
Results corrected to dry wt.
Helminth Ova <1 viable ova/ 31.3 gm dry solids
Enteric Viruses <1 PFU virus/ 62.6 gm dry solids
1 hereby certify that I have reviewed and approve these data. /l(,L 1//
0— ,�i�c41
Maurice H. Vautan,Jr.
Laboratory Supervisor
642 Tamco Road, Reidsville, North Carolina 27320
tel.[phone] fax.[phone]

RESEARCh & ANA1yTICAL
. LAbORATORIES, INC. - icr) NC #34 7-• _
.~ -..<: - Analytical/Process Consultations ;.''C'F �RFCT�P' ��.�
x•city Char eristic Leachate Procedure (TCLP) Analysis of Sample Identified as Silt Pond for The Town of Madison
22 June 1995) r
Sam Sample Sample Sample EPA HW Results Characteristic
Identification Number Date Matrix Number Contaminant fmg/Il Level(mg/Il EPA Method
Silt Pond 241491 6/22/95 Solid D-004 Arsenic <0.100 5.0 7060
" D-005 Barium 0.319 100.0 6010
" " " D-018 Benzene <0.010 0.50 8240
" D-006 Cadmium <0.010 1.0 6010
" " " " D-019 Carbon Tetrachloride <0.010 0.50 8240
" " D-020 Chlordane <0.003 0.030 8080
. " D-021 Chlorobenzene <0.010 100.0 8240
' " D-022 Chloroform <0.100 6.0 8240
• - " D-077 Chromium 0.018 5.0 6010
• " DM23 0-Creosol <20 200.0 8270
" " " D-024 M-Creosol <20 200.0 8270
" " D-025 p-Creosol <20 200.0 8270
" D-026 Creosol <20 200.0 8270
' " " D-016 2,4-D <1.0 10.0 8150
" " D-027 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.750 7.50 8270
. D-028 1.2-Dichloroethane <0.010 0.50 3240
" D-029 1.1-Dichloroethylene <0.010 0.70 8240
" D-030 2.4-Dinitrotoluene <0.010 0.130 8270
' " D-012 Endrin <0.002 0.020 8080
" " " D-031 Heptachlor <0.0008 0.008 8080
" " " D-032 Hexachlorobenzene <0.010 0.130 8270
" " D-033 Hexachlorobutadiene <0.050 0.50 8270
" - D-034 Hezachloroethane <0.300 3.0 8270
" " " D-008 Lead <0.100 5.0 6010
" ' D-013 Lindane <0.04 0.4 8080
' D-009 Mercury <0.002 0.2 7470
' " " " D-014 Methoxychlor <1.0 10.0 8050
' " " D-035 Methyl Ethyl Ketone <0.500 200.0 8240
" • " D-036 Nitrobenzene <0.200 2.0 8270
" " D-037 Pentachlorophenol <10 100.0 8270
. " D-038 Pyridine <0.500 5.0 8240
. D-010 Selenium <0.100 1.0 7740
. D-011 Silver <0.010 5.0 6010
" D-039 Tetrachloroethylene <0.010 0.7 8240
" " ' " D-015 Toxaphene <0.05 0.5 R080
" " D-040 Trichloroethylene <0.010 0.5 8240
" D-041 2.4,5-Trichiorophenol <40 400.0 8270
• " " D-042 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol <0.200 2.0 8270
" " D-017 2,4,5-TP(Silvex) <0.10 1.0 8150
" " " D-043 Vinyl Chloride <0.010 0.2 8240
' " D-003 Cyar»de(Reacavity) <1.0 mg/kg 9010
' - D-003 Sulfide(Reacuvity) <2.0 mg/kg 9030
' ' D-002 pH(Corrosivtry) 6.5 Std. Units 9045
" " - D-001 Flash Point(Ignitabtltry! > 140°F 1010
mg/l = milligrams per liter = parts per million r
mg/kg = milligrams per kilogram = parts per million }1° ` `-' (,i.t 0
< = less than or below detection limits (BOL) 9 pI
t
P 0 BOA 4,3 • 10E :,r,crt Street • r,prne^:vine, rvcrcr.Carina 2729= • 910? E-?94� �,'�'r '"L'. -'-<'z�, _•
•
�L
-.r-.t ?...t.L.!•- 1_r'

•
•
• A.nalytical
ery
c S
Services, Inc.
Client: Water Technology and Controls, Inc. Sample Date: February 2, 1998
Address: 642 Tamco Road Sample Received: February 5, 1998
Reidsville, NC 27320
Laboratory Analysis Report
Sample Sample# Parameter Amount Analyzed Analyst,, Results
ID (wet weight) (wet weight)
Helminth Ova 50 gm PAJ <1 viable ova/50 gm total solids
020206 98036-019
Enteric Viruses 100 gm PAJ <1 PFU virus/100 gm total solids
PFU=Plaque Forming Unit MPN=Most Probable Number
Methods Used under 40CFR Part503
Enteric Viruses: ASTM Method D 4994-89, Part A& B. 1989.
Helminth Ova: EPA. December. Control of Pathogens and Vector Attraction in Sewaae Sludge.
EPA Pub. 600/1-87/014 Office of Research and Development, Cincinnati, OH.
Project No.: 98036-019

Water Technology and Controls, Client: Tel: /
Inc. )(VA-A:n c1-CPicea. ,c.-7 336/tiL7 - r:,'L
642 Tamco Road Address: Fax: l •
it Reidsville, NC 27320 �,.1
t tel. [phone] /2.: ,'U I'14rieef- t /yGc( s../ /t%t Z7o4 I—
Attention:
36 Sr27- LS,_15
�'•�d Attention: P.O.#:
fax. [phone]
CP,yA.
Person Taking Sample(signature): Project#
Chain of Custody Record If Composite? ��G�,
Lab Use Only
Sample Date Time Date Time Comp? #of Tests Required On pH OK?
Location/ID# 1 1 2 2 Grab? Conts. Ice? Cl2 OK?
7-4Av 12_1#0 6.-4)7 Wm, 147 C.9,-;--, r)7
if 2/z/y,- i 2`l J4
C•,,c t, 7vbcis
Method of Shipment: Comments: n /
❑ UPS 4 f f-, /— i Xe c..5:�,-)
❑ Fed Ex
Relinquished by: Date: Time: Received by: Date: Time:
❑ hind Delivery ?ii61-7,2 .......1 27/1-A;—
Relinquished by: Date: Time: Rece i 1 y: Date: Time:
❑ Other
Relinquished by: Date: Time: Recei 7 •I•.- Date: Time:
\Q c;� i 3`)El1

.. ' I?ESEARCII & AN*11CAL CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
LABORATORIES, INC.
SS ,`j Analytical/Process Consultations
Phone [phone] • •
WATER/WASTEWATER MISC.
JOB NO. PROJECT NAME �o
a,
a
'To toil
0f Mc.,ell SOP✓ m yea,
m ��
Z y, `��i`�,Dh �yh
SAMPLERS (SIGNATURE) Qm Jc C? `ac `F
kf/Z177., 0
*0° ~� �?m?vo
��o LL Q �yOO Oc O Q
O �2 .m Q VO A Q
Z pF 0 0 Q�C� Q�Q Q�t
SAMPLE NO. DATE TIME COMP WI STATION LOCATION ry� cV ryh ^ y` REQUESTED ANALYSIS
•4k,( (/q( 1 -aD a.•// s,1-1 podol 3 . _ _ . -rcLp
111111111r-
RELI QUISH D . DATE/TIME RE EIVED Y REMARKS:
Z=k � y
RELINO JISHED BY DATE/TIME �HECEIVEU 3E Y /[- ZV..,,Q ' t _
I i'r ;

WATER TECHNOLOGY AND CONTROLS, INC.
Water Treatment Chemistries & Environmental Laboratory
•
August 5, 1997
Mr. Mike Morrison
Town of Madison WWTP
120 N. Market St.
Madison, NC 27025
Dear Mr. Morrison:
Enclosed are results for the Alum Sludge sample taken on
July 22, 1997.
If you have any questions concerning these data please
contact me.
Sincerely,
II/ix:L.(1/ 4.4\
Mike Vaugpn
Laboratory Supervisor
Offices: 106-A South Walnut Circle • P.O. Box 8808 • Greensboro, N.C. 27419 • [phone]
Laboratory: 642 Tamco Road • Reidsville, N.C. 27320 • [phone]

WATER TECHNOLOGY AND CONTROLS, INC.
Environmental Laboratory
642 Tamco Rd. Reidsville, N. C. 27320
(910) 342-4748
Laboratory Certification No. 165
Customer: Town of Madison WWTP
Contact Person: Mr. Mike Morrison
Date Sample Rcvd: 07/22/97
Report Date: 08/05/97
WT&C Number: 07229748
Sample: Alum Sludge 7/22/97
PARAMETERS RESULTS
pH 5. 56 Std. units
Ammonia Nitrogen <10 mg/kg dry wt.
Nitrate Nitrogen 10. 5 mg/kg dry vt.
Nitrite Nitrogen <0. 5 mg/kg dry wt.
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen 1, 853 mg/kg dry wt.
Total Phosphorus <5 mg/kg dry wt.
Aluminum, total 68, 400 mg/kg dry wt.
Cadmium, total 0. 3 mg/kg dry wt.
Copper, total 37. 0 mg/kg dry wt.
Lead, total 16. 0 mg/kg dry wt.
Nickel, total 20. 0 mg/kg dry wt.
Zinc, total 95. 0 mg/kg dry wt.
Calcium, total 648 mg/kg dry wt.
Magnesium, total 3250 mg/kg dry vt.
Potassium, total 3870 mg/kg dry wt.
Sodium, total 3110 mg/kg dry wt.
Percent Total Solids 42. 37%
*Fecal Coliform <10 Col/100m1
*Note: Result is based on 1. 0 g (vet ) of sample dissolved in 100mL
of water. Ten milliliters of that prepared sample was filtered and
no colonies were present.

Water Technology and Controls, Inc.
642 Tarnco Road Client: Tel:
ii
Reidsville, NC 27320 7oc..>r► c"-'* /Liar! ,sue, 'w'rP 42'7 -Os L0 -j
r tel. [phone] Address: 2 z C Fax:
rl' •
fax. [phone] /zo N 1�-(4s P f 9 . 1((c>c.� y Z? - 2-5-6 S
t�•-.,.. �� Attention: P.O.#: •
Chain of Custody Record ilje
e._ Cif!,- -,--1
0-t-,-7a 4 Person Taking Sample(signature): Project#
4 If composite? Lab
��--�� Lab Use Only
• Sample Date Time Date Time Comp? #of Tests Required On pH
Location/ID# 1 1 2 2 Grab? Conts.
Ice? OK?
E Nt+3 pp�- 1" N V
lug s� -_ J
P ii9 7 5.),As ,UOz ) A-VD
it-( 413 .‘47
Method of Shipment: Comments:
CI UPS
❑ FED EX
Relinquished by: Date: Time: Recieved by: Date: Time:
f Hand Delivery 27/49 /2'l,-,—�� 7—2 Z
Relinquished by: Date: Time: Recieved by: Date: Time:
[i Other -----7 I
Relinqu Ded by: �l Date: Time:
Reciev, y: Date: -7I 3� rt7 Time: l GPM
l