20030509 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20030424

o?0,
wH i?Rpc
? r
t7 ?
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, PE, Director
Division of Water Quality
June 24, 2003
DWQ Project # 03-0509
Pamlico County
Harry Myers & Delma Heine
8350 Pinehurst Road
Pasadena, Maryland 21122
Subject Property: Lot 21, Whorton Harbor SD, 2436 Brown's Creek Road, Merrit, NC 28556
Browns Creek [03-04-10; 27-141-3; SA HQW (high quality) NSW (Nutrient Sensitive)]
APPROVAL for the use of the "General" MAJOR VARIANCE; From the Neuse and Tar-Pamlico Riparian Buffer
Rules for the Construction of Residential Structures on Existing Lots within the Coastal Counties as defined by
the Coastal Area Management Act with ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Dear Mr. Myers and Ms. Heine:
You have our approval, in accordance with the conditions listed below, to impact 572 square feet (fe) of Zone 2 (only) of
the protected riparian buffers for the purpose of constructing a single family residence on the subject property as
described within your application dated April 16, 2003. This letter shall act as your approval for the use of the "General"
Major Variance; From the Neuse and Tar-Pamlico Riparian Buffer Rules for the Construction of Residential Structures on
Existing Lots within the Coastal Counties as defined by the Coastal Area Management Act with ADDITIONAL
CONDITIONS as approved by the Water Quality Committee (WQC) of the Environmental Management Commission
(EMC) on May 10, 2001. In addition, you should get any other required federal, state or local permits before you proceed
with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control and CAMA permits. This approval shall
expire when the variance expires on April 11, 2006 unless it is renewed before that time by the EMC.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your variance request. If you change your
project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new request for approval. If the property is sold, the
new owner must be given a copy of this approval and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. For this
approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed below.
Conditions:
1. No Impacts to Zone 1
No impacts shall occur to Zone 1 of the protected riparian buffers (except for uses and activities designated
as "exempt" within 15A NCAC 02B.0233), unless otherwise approved by the DWQ.
2. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer Rules,
and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached certificate of completion to
the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC,
27699-1650.
3. Diffuse Flow
All new stormwater drainage shall be directed to vegetated areas as diffuse flow at non-erosive velocities
prior to entering the protected riparian buffers as identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233(5). No new ditching or
piping of stormwater through the protected buffers is allowed.
4. Protective Fencing
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands/
Page 2 of 2
The outside buffer boundary and along the construction corridor within these boundaries approved under this
authorization shall be clearly marked with orange fabric fencing (or similar high visibility material) for the areas
that have been approved to infringe within the buffer. This fencing shall be installed prior to any land
disturbing activities to ensure compliance with 15A NCAC 2B .0233. The protective fencing should be
removed once construction is complete.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this approval, you may ask for and adjudicatory hearing. You must act within
60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition that conforms to Chapter
150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh,
NC 27699-6714. This approval and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under the Neuse River Riparian Buffer Protection Rules
(15A NCAC 2B .0233 (9)(b)). Please call Mr. Bob Zarzecki at 919-733-9726 or Ms. Tom Steffens at 252-946-6481 if you
have any questions or require copies of our rules or procedural materials.
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
Director, DWQ
Attachments: Coastal General Variance
Certificate of Completion
cc: Tom Steffens, DWQ Washington Regional Office
DCM Morehead City District Office, 151-B Hwy. 24, Hestron Plaza II, Morehead City, NC 28557
File copy
Central Files
DWQ Project No. 03-0509
June 24, 2003
bz
?Iy
T
Post-it' Fax Note 7671 (Date 6 j0-v5
r_ k A From , __/t
Co./Dept.
Phone #
F
i? ? zS S ,_)
uor ?
pages
t?
Phone#
Fax #
June 24, 2003
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
?partment of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, PE, Director
Division of Water Quality
DWQ Project # 03-0509
Pamlico County
Harry Myers & Delma Heine
8350 Pinehurst Road
Pasadena, Maryland 21122
Subject Property: Lot 21, Whorton Harbor SD, 2436 Brown's Creek Road, Merrit, NC 28556
Browns Creek [03-04-10; 27-141-3; SA HOW (high quality) NSW (Nutrient Sensitive)]
APPROVAL for the use of the "General" MAJOR VARIANCE; From the Neuse and Tar-Pamlico Riparian Buffer
Rules for the Construction of Residential Structures on Existing Lots within the Coastal Counties as defined by
the Coastal Area Management Act with ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Dear Mr. Myers and Ms. Heine:
You have our approval, in accordance with the conditions listed below, to impact 572 square feet (fe) of Zone 2 (only) of
the protected riparian buffers for the purpose of constructing a single family residence on the subject property as
described within your application dated April 16, 2003. This letter shall act as your approval for the use of the "General"
Major Variance; From the Neuse and Tar-Pamlico Riparian Buffer. Rules for the Construction of Residential Structures on
Existing Lots within the Coastal Counties as defined by the Coastal Area Management Act with ADDITIONAL
CONDITIONS as approved by the Water Quality Committee (WQC) of the Environmental Management Commission
(EMC) on May 10, 2001. In addition, you should get any other required federal, state or local permits before you proceed
with your project including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control and CAMA permits. This approval shall
expire when the variance expires on April 11, 2006 unless it is renewed before that time by the EMC.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your variance request. If you change your
project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new request for approval. If the property is sold, the
new owner must be given a copy of this approval and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. For this
approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed below.
Conditions
1. No Impacts to Zone 1
No impacts shall occur to Zone 1 of the protected riparian buffers (except for uses and activities designated
as "exempt" within 15A NCAC 02B .0233), unless otherwise approved by the DWQ.
2. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer Rules,
and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached certificate of completion to
the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC,
27699-1650.
3. Diffuse Flow
All new stormwater drainage shall be directed to vegetated areas as diffuse flow at non-erosive velocities
prior to entering the protected riparian buffers as identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233(5). No new ditching or
piping of stormwater through the protected buffers is allowed.
4. Protective Fencing
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands/
imap:Hbob.zarzecki%40dwq.denr.ncmail.net@nplex I mcmail.net:143/
Subject: RE: STATUS OF APPLICATION
From: Delma Heine <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 15:48:50 -0400
To: "'Bob Zarzecki"' <[e-mail]>
CC: Harry Myers <[e-mail]>
Thanks so much for the info. What a relief! I realize that you have an enormous of work to do but I sincerely
appreciate your quick response.
My husband and I are very much looking forward to moving to NC.
Our fax number is [phone] and our home phone number is [phone]. Please don't hesitate to call if
there is anything that we can do to facilitate this process.
And thanks again for your help.
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Zarzecki [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 15:20
To: Delma Heine
Cc: Tom Steffens (WaRO)
Subject: Re: STATUS OF APPLICATION
Delma:
I have your name crossed off my call back list. I don't cross off names unless I return their call.
I'm not sure what happened. I was out of the office Weds, Thurs and Fri and returned to the
office today. Your variance has been recommended for approval. I plan to write the approval
this week. I will attempt to fax you the approval once my supervisor has signed it. I appologize
for the delay.
- Bob
Delma Heine wrote:
Good afternoon Mr. Zarzecki.
Last Tuesday I left a voice message for yourself and Mr. Steffans. I inquired about the status of my
variance application DWQ project # 03-0509. 1 have not yet heard anything back from you or Mr. Steffans
concerning my inquiry.
The original application for variance was delivered to DWQ on 17 April 2003, or, 68 days ago.
I have attempted to contact Mr. Dorney, but he is apparently unavailable for several days.
I have also tried to contact Mr. Steffans, but he is on leave until July 1 rst.
Please let us know what is currently happening with this application so that we know what our future
course of action should be.
I look forward to hearing from you soon.
1 of 1 6/23/03 3:54 PM
May 28, 2003 [ ?+;1VLSe_
Harry Myers
Delma Heine z ?,?? or ?J? r~
8350 Pinehurst RD J
Pasadena, MD 21 122-5837 M;
[phone] _
Email: [e-mail]
North Carolina Division of Water Qual,
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27604-2240
Refs: DWQ PROJECT 03-0509 (Pamlico County)
WETLANDS1401 GROUF
JUN r.
i Ull.?
'VATER QUALITY SECTION
Subject Property: Lot 21 Whorton Harbor SD, 2436 Brown's Creek Rd,
Merritt, NC 28556 (03-04-10; 27-141-3 SA HQW (high quality) NSW (Nutrient Sensitive)
Dear Mr. Zarzecki,
In reference to the letter which we received may 27`I' and which was dated may 16`h, please consider
the following.
Originally our house was sited on our lot so that there would be no encroachment into either zone
one or zone two of the wetland areas. We have made every attempt to conform to North Carolina code as it
concerns protection of wetland habitat.
However, when we visited the site with our builder on April 11"' of this year to site the house for building,
he (Mr. Stuart Hardy), and the surveyor, pointed out to us that the current orientation of our house would
most probably give us a view of the front of the house in lot 920 (our lot is #21 and the end lot) vice a water
view. At that point, we jointly concluded that there was no alternative but to rotate the position of the
house on the lot. Consequently, we reoriented the house to face directly across the creek which put us into
zone two of the wetland area and a variance was subsequently applied for.
We would appreciate your consideration in this matter. At this point we have invested at least $3000 in
house plans, approximately $57,000 for a lot with a water view, our own home has been sold, and we have
committed in a contract to moving out of our current residence before the end of this calendar year. We
would be placed in a most difficult position if the variance is not approved as submitted
We therefore request a waiver so that the house may be situated as shown on the original plan which was
submitted on April 16, 2003, to your office.
Sincerely,
May 28, 2003
Harry Myers
Delma Heine
8350 Pinehurst RD
Pasadena, MD 21 122-5837
[phone]
Email: hlmyersgyahoo.com
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27604-2240
Refs: DWQ PROJECT #03-0509 (Pamlico County)
s
Subject Property: Lot 21 Whorton Harbor SD, 2436 Brown's Greek Rd,
Merritt, NC 28556 (03-04-10: 27-141-3 SA HQW (high quality) NSW (Nutrient Sensitive)
Dear Mr. Dorney,
In reference to the letter which we received may 27°i and which was dated may 16°', please consider
the following.
Originally our house was sited on our lot so that there would be no encroachment into either zone
one or zone two of the wetland areas. We have made every attempt to conform to North Carolina code as it
concerns protection of wetland habitat.
However, when we visited the site with our builder on April 1 1 "' of this year to site the house for building,
he (Mr. Stuart Hardy), and the surveyor, pointed out to us that the current orientation of our house would
most probably give us a view of the front of the house in lot 420 (our lot is #21 and the end lot) vice a water
view. At that point, we jointly concluded that there was no alternative but to rotate the position of the
house on the lot. Consequently, we reoriented the house to face directly across the creek which put us into
zone two of the wetland area and a variance was subsequently applied for.
We would appreciate your consideration in this matter. At this point we have invested at least $3000 in
house plans, approximately $57,000 for a lot with a water view, our own home has been sold, and we have
committed in a contract to moving out of our current residence before the end of this calendar year. We
would be placed in a most difficult position if the variance is not approved as submitted
We therefore request a waiver so that the house may be situated as shown on the original plan which was
submitted on April 16, 2003, to your off-ice.
Sincerely,
Mai 28 03 11:13a Harry Myers
[phone] p.l
Harry Myct',s
8350 PinehUrst Rd
Pasadena, MD 21 122-5837
[phone]
[phone] (fax)
hlrnyersna vahoo.com
r
To: Mr. Bob Larzecki
From: Harry Myers
Re: Lot 21 Whorton Harbor
CC:
0 Urgent 21 For Review ? Please Comment ? Please Reply ? Please Recycle
Fax: [phone]
Date: 5/28/200:,
Pages: 2

I will follow up with a mailed copy. You said to send a copy to Tom
Steffens, but I could find no address on your request letter, unless he is at
the same address as Tracey Wheeler in Moorhead City. If he is at a different
address please send it to me. Email is fine if it is convenient for you.
Mai 28 03 11:13a Harrtj Myers [phone] P..e

Mav 28, 2003
Harry L. Myers
8350 Pinehurst RD
Pasadena, MD 21122-5837
[phone]
,yahoo.com
Email: hhnycrs(e?
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
401 Wetlands Certification Unit
1650 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27604-2240
Refs: DWQ PROJECT #03-0509 (Pamlico County)
Our Phone Conversation May 28, 2003
Subject Property: Lot 21 Whorton Harbor SD, 2436 Brown's Creek Rd,
Merritt, NC 28556 (03-04-10; 27-141-3 SA HQW (high quality) NSW (Nutrient
Sensitive)
Dear Mr. Zarzecki,
Please consider the following.
Originally our house was sited on our lot so that there would be no encroachment
into either zone one or zone two of the wetland areas. We have made every attempt to
conform to North Carolina code as it concerns protection of wetland habitat.
However, when we visited the site with our builder on April I 1 `" of this year to
site the house for building, he (Mr. Stuart Hardy), and the surveyor, pointed out to us that
the current orientation of our house would most probably give us a view of the front of
the house in lot #20 (our lot is 421 and the end lot) vice a water view. At that point, we
jointly concluded that there was no alternative but to rotate the position of the house on
the lot. Consequently. we reoriented the house to face directly across the creek which put.
us into zone two of the wetland area and a variance was subsequently applied for.
We would appreciate your consideration in this matter. At this point we have
invested at least $3000 in house plans, approximately $57,000 for a lot with a water view..
our own home has been sold, and we have committed in a contract to moving out of our
current residence before the end of this calendar year. We would be placed in a most
difficult position if the variance is not approved as submitted
We therefore request a waiver so that the house may be situated as shown on the
original plan which was submitted on April 16, 2003, to your office.
Sincerely,
? I
c i
1
OF wArFT pG Michael F. Easley
Governor
co r William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
j y Department of Environment and Natural Resources
A `r Alan W. Klimek, PE, Director
Division of Water Quality
May 16, 2003
DWQ Project # 03-0509
Pamlico County
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
Harry Myers
8350 Pinehurst Road
Pasadena, Maryland 21122
Subject Property: Lot 21, Whorton Harbor SD, 2436 Brown's Creek Road, Merrit, NC 28556 .
Browns Creek [03-04-10; 27-141-3; SA HQW (high quality) NSW (Nutrient Sensitive)]
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Dear Mr. Myers:
On April 17, 2003, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Wetlands/401 Unit received your minor variance request dated April
16, 2003. The DWQ has determined that your project is eligible for the use of the "General" Major Variance From the
Neuse and Tar-Pamlico Riparian Buffer Rules for residential structures on existing lots within the coastal counties as
defined by the Coastal Area Management Act, Approved 51912001, because the lot was platted and a septic permit was
issued before August 1, 2000. However, the DWQ needs additional information in order to complete the approval process
of your variance. Therefore, unless additional information is provided as described below, we will have to move toward
denial of your request per 15A NCAC 2B.0259(9) and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive this
additional information. Specifically:
Additional Information:
• House Location
Based on the "Preliminary Environmental Map and Staking Plan" provided with your application, it appears that the
house could be relocated or otherwise reconfigured such that impacts to the buffers could be avoided or minimized.
Please relocate or reconfigure the house to avoid or minimize the impacts or provide additional information as to why
this is not practicable.
Please respond in writing within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending a copy of this information to me and Mr.
Tom Steffens of the DWQ Washington Regional Office at [phone]. If we do not hear from you in three weeks, we
will assume that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will consider the project as withdrawn. Please call Mr.
Bob Zarzecki of this office at [phone] if you have any questions.
n r ey,
tiands / 40 U it, DWQ
cc: Tom Steffens, DWQ Washington Regional Offi e
Tracey Wheeler, DCM Morehead City District O ce, 151-B Hwy. 24, Hestron Plaza II, Morehead City, NC 28557
File copy
Central Files
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/
Wetlands Tracking 401S
Facility Name Harry Ayers
Project Number 03 0509
Project Type purpose of residential lilt for home site County Pamlico
Location Brown Creek Merrit County2 _j
Received From WARO COE ID # ( Region Washington
Received Date April 24, 2003 COE Susp Date I Reg. Contact
Sent to Region Date I DCM Susp Date I APPLICATION FEE INFO
Rcvd Region Date I TIP Number ( Payment Date Ij
rR-
Last Action Date '-Flay 16, 2003 ? More Info Requested 5/16/2003 ? Amount Paid
Last Action Hold More Info Received 6/2/2003 Payor
Latitude (ddmmss) I Mitigation ? I Check # I j
Longitude (ddmmss) I COC Received Date
Certificates Stream Area
Area Length Length
Permit Wetland Wetland Stream Class Wetland (acres) (acres) (feet) (feet)
Type Cert # Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Subbasin Class Req. APPr. Req. Appr. "Y"
NBR +?. Buffers p Y 0 N ?. 27-141-3 SA NSWHQ 030410 error 0.01
i
Total for 401:
Stream ImJr-
Subbasin WRP Mitigation
Mitigation Proje
ct Wetland Wetland Area Length Completion Peren- acres feet MitigationType Number Type Class ( ) ( ) Date nial Total Mitigation:
lookupWR P
Date _% ; G ? ?.
T1WO# Triave (ln_PnlAT attar )rl
C4 r"LZ. on the site plan.
_ -?L ,
s overlays on the site plan.
Jn VVWC II M IVOi1UVi i O1 any proposed stormwater management practices as required by GC
? Please provide detail for the stormwater management practices as required by GC
? Please specify the percent of project imperviousness area based on the estimated built-out conditions.
? Please indicate all stormwater outfalls on the site plan-
c3 Please indicate the diffuse flow provision measures on the site plan.
? Please Indicate whether or not the proposed Impacts already been conducted.
$$) Avoidance and/or Minimization Not Provided
? The on the plans does not appear to be necessary. Please eliminate the or provide additional information as to why
It Is necessary .for this project o? ?Ua4 1w o o, n `seo? ?
This Office believes that the labeled on the plans as Y can be moved or reconfigured to avoi 4he impacts to the Please
revise the plans to avoid the Impacts.
This Office believes that the 1 on the plans aw can be moved or reconfigured to minimize the Impacts to Please n
revise the plans to minimize the impact P x lo• , 'AX t ,n eu c 4-s' C & Vt n o-f 6e N utSe I C,( ?a 5 r K 13'40
? y
? The stormwater discharges at the location on the plans labeled will not provide diffuse flow through the buffer because . Please
revise the plans and provide calculations to show that diffuse flow will be achieved through the entire buffer. If It Is not possible to achieve. diffuse
flow through the entire buffer then. it may be necessary to provide stormwater management practices that remove nutrients before the stomiwater
can be discharged through the buffer.
$$) Other
? The application fee was insufficient because over 150 feet of stream and/or over 1 acre of wetiand impact was requested. Please provide $
This additional fee must be received before your application can be reviewed.
? Please complete Section(s) on the applicaflon.
? Please provide a signed copy of the application.
Please provide - copies of the OPIEU]s supporting Information.
$$) Mitigation
E1 of compensatory mitigation is required for this project. Please provide a compensatory mitigation plan. The plan must conform
to the requirements in 15 A NCAC 2H .0500 and must be appropriate to the type of impacts proposed.
? Please Indicate which 404 Permit the USACE would use to authorize this project.
OFFICE USE ONLY: Date Received

b
state of Forth Carolina
em .no Natural Resources
(CAVE
Department of Environm
Division of vveterQuality
Y APR 1 7 2003
Variance Request Form - for MWor Variance 8WQ-WAR0
Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Areas Rules
NOTE. This form maybe photocopied for use as an oilpfnal.
Please identify which Riparian Area Protection Rule applies.
X Neuse River Basin: Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy
Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Areas Rule (15A NCAC.0233) if_
c Tar-Pamlico River Basin:. Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management ? w
Strategy Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Areas Rule (45A
NCAC .0259)
r"b/tL 1. 17CIiClgl illfuilltaUVn
(please Include attachments if the room provided is insuffrcientj
1
2.
3.
Applicants game (the corporation, Individual, etc. who owns the property):
Print Owner/Signing Official (person legally responsible for the property and its compliance)
Name:
Title:
Street address:
&tA-' n-pw- & I 'a M Ay
City, state, Zip:
Telephone,
Fax:
Contact person who can answer questions about the proposed project:
Name:
Telephone-. ayaj-U3'a -SILL
Fax:
Email:
4. Project Name (Subdivision, facility, or establishment name - consistent with project name on
plans, specifications, letters, operation and maintenance agreements, etc-):
L ;:1 1 W ho &To AJ I-I AR Bo R
5, P-ojact Location:
Street address:
City, state, zip,
County:
Version 1: February 2000

-i
4 please provide an explanation of the following:
(1) The practical difficulties or hardships that would result from 1he strict application of this
Rule.
--> .A.rn/ U or3S'RL?E RELNJ A.i?'?i ANl_IRF J>EQ AU SE
?'C-.S IC:E an -cs S1is c7rZ;E1LLj a-ri_?;>,t T. aAiz _ i?HTG
Latitude/longitude:
Directio,IS to site from nearest major intersection (Also, attach an 8'/1 x 11 copy of the USGS
topographic map indicating the location of the site)n n e- 1 -T .? ? m VT
.^. Tc.
=-a, 1'-q
..FX? Q^ "
•oF F"?R _?Fi STR&ET (::?, iJ RIci?
7, Stream to be impacted by the proposed activity.
St %Am name (for unnamed streams label as "UT" to the nearest named stream):
<
Stream classification (as identified within the Schedule of Glassifications ISA NCAC 28 .0315
(Neuse) or.0316 (Tar-Pamlico)): _ ADZ O S E -
3. Which of the following permitsiapprovals will be required or have been received already for
this project?
Required: Received: Date received: Permit Type:
CANAA Major
CAMA Minor
401 Certification/404 Permit
On-site Wastewater Permit
_ NPDES Permit (including stormwater)
Non-discharge Permit
Water Supply Watershed Variance
i Others (specify) S - PMC.
S.y1 r??
Part 2: Proposed Activity
(Please include affachments if the room provided is lnsuf -dent.)
Description of proposed activity (Also, please attach a map of sufficirlit. detail (such as a plat
map or site plan) to accurately delineate the boundaries of t'he land to be utilized in carry;ng
out the activ'Ity, the location and dimension of any disturbance in the riparian buffers
associated with the activity, and the extent of riparian suffers on the land. Include the area
of buffer impact in fe.:
t-- '-n i 1] . ? '\ taTG ,? -k -• 1-7 . k-,% -k 1 S A -r TA L Ncn..n
State reasons why this plan for the proposed activity cannot be practically accomplished,
reduced or reconfigured to better minimize or eliminate disturbance to the riparian buffers.
3. Description of any best management practices to be used to control impacts associated with
the propesad activity (i.e., control of runoff from impervious surfaces ro provide diffuse flow,
re-planting vegetation or enhancement of exist°ng vegetation, etc.):
F ior,v •
Variance Request Form, page 2
Vsrs;on 1: February 2000
5 .i A i118rv Q c"I 'nil LIT* ? -
4. please provide an explanation of the following:
(1) The practical difficulties or hardships that would result frorn the strict application of this
C21 lick
AL' SC
ATSA -
AS
Part 3: Deed Restrictions
By your signature in Part b of this application, you certify that all structural stormwater best
management practices required by this variance shall be located in recorded storm, water
easements, that the easements will run with the land, that the easements cannot be changed or
deleted without concurrence from the State, and that the easements will be recorded prior to the
sale of any lot-
Part 4: Agent Authorization
if you wish to designate submittal authority to another individual or firm so that they may provide
information on your behalf, please complete this section:
Designated agent (1
Mailing address:
City, State, Zip*
Telephone:
F aX:
t=mail:
Part 5: Applicant's Certification
1, NA `R'/ m Y (print or type name of person !fisted
in Part 1, item 2), certify 'hat the information included or, this permit application form is correct,
that the project will be constructed in conformance with the approved plans and that the deed
restrictions in accordance with Part 5 of this form will be recorded with all required permit
conditions.
Signature:
Date: I TO 1 ;2 'n.
Title:
Variance Request Form, page 3
Versien 1: February 2MO
(2) How these difficulties or hardships result from conditions that are unique to the property
(3) if economic hardship is the major considers"Jon, then include a specific explanaton of the
economic hardships and the proportion of the hardship to the entire value of the project.
IA \F- 11kil-E ALREADY E';Xsxan7T ' D ?tnE F?Ct'EivSE ?F' c, I= Lt- Pic I.
GREED
MEAN HIGH MITE
WATER IS
PROPERTY
LINE
.iL

TOTAL PROPOSED
ZONE 2 ENCROACHMENT
572 SQ. FT,

AIL

L
\

LEGEND
LONE ? FLAGGED
MARS, N
>? °j INInA
720,E
?\ 89 Ip uA`? N
? . n5 y J ? ? PROP ? 2
15.4 --
.iL

?OSREP F,
e0•+ ti
M
PROo?SED 17 p ?R
20' unuTr
SAS=N= PROPERLY
?- ALINE
NOTES
1. SURVEYOR HAS MADE NO INDEPENDENT
SEARCH OR INVES77GA7701V FOR
RIGHTS-OF-WAY OR EASEMENTS OF RECORD
FOR STREETS, HIGHWAYS, PUBLIC U7ILI77ES
NOR FOR ENCUMBRANCES, RESTRICTIVE
COVENANTS, OWNERSHIP, 7171E OR ANY 07HER
FACTS THAT A CURRENT 777LE SEARCH MAY
DISCLOSE
PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO LAND-USE AND
2
,
WATERSHED LAWS AND REGULA7701VS OF
PAMLICO COUNTY AND THE STATE OF NORTH
CAROLINA. COMPLIANCE WITH SUCH
REGULA77ONS HAS NOT BEEN CONSIDERED BY
AL THIS SURVEY. CAMA FLAGS PROVIDED BY N.C.
DIVISON OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT CONTACT
TRACY WHEELER, 252-808-2808.
3 THIS PROPERTY LIES IN A FEMA DESIGNATED
ZONE A7 (EL 8)" AS SHOWN ON FIRM 370181
0285 B, DATED SEPTEMBER 4, 1985.
4. THIS SURVEY PLAT DOES NOT CREATE A
SUBDIVISION. THIS MAP IS FOR
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND PLANNING
PURPOSES ONLY.
AIL
5. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL.
6. IRON ROD WITH CAP SET AT CORNERS UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED.
7 AREA BY COORDINATES
LOT 21
3.90 ACRES
OP = EXISTING IRON PIPE 60 0 30 60

REFERENCE _
NPS = NO POINT SET
A FLAG LOCATED m?? I
1p Fi P
CAM
ml
D.B. 355, PG. 126
R/W = RIGHT OF WAY P. C. A, SL. 117-2
1 inch = 60 ft.
LOT 20
PO
- NOT SURVEYED 0 4F
DATE PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL MAP AND STAKING PLAN
FTHISMAP P IS FOR ENWRONMENTAL HEALTH AND PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY ®ND-0N SURVEYING 03/17/03 HARRY L. M YERS
SUR'>E'YORS CONSULTANTS
IS NOT I NTENDED FOR CONVEYANCE, DEED PREPARATION, OR SALES. P0. Box 399 OBlBNTe4 N.c. E8571 DRAWING NUMBER LOT 21, WHORTON HARBOR
(252)'U,.-?yet wwwnizvnsurmymg.com PP-03026 TAX ID: K071-24-1
TOWNSHIP 2 PAMLICO COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA