20090951 Ver 1_Staff Report_20090914

Mcmillan, Ian
From: Mcmillan, Ian
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 9:04 PM
To: Mcmillan, Ian
Subject: FW: 090951, Crosswinds S/D, Cumberland county
From: Averitte, Ken
Sent: Monday, September 14, 2009 11:50 AM
To: Mcmillan, Ian
Subject: 090951, Crosswinds S/D, Cumberland county
Ian,
I visited this place last week. It is well under way, though they have been careful to avoid the wetland areas, so far.
can't believe the % impervious, but don't know what they used for a denominator. I agree with the ad info letter. Site
plans should be required for certain lots, and explanations should be provided on how they plan to maintain the
wetland.
I filled out the BIMS inspection report with comments.
Thanks
K
Ken Averitte
Environmental Senior Specialist
Fayetteville Regional Office
[phone]
PLEASE NOTE MY NEW E-MAIL ADDRESS
[e-mail]
E-mail correspondence to and from this address may be subject to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be
disclosed to third parties.

Staff Report
Project Num: 20090951
Name: Crosswinds Sec 4 Part 2
County: Cumberland
Location: Big Sandy Run CPF Fayetteville
Latitude: +34°59'26"
SW Plan Location:
Owner: Koenig, John
Contact Person: Koenig, John
Inspection Date: 09/10/2009
Reason for Inspection: Routine
On-Site Representative(s):
Primary Inspector: Kenneth L Averitte
Secondary Inspector(s):
Question Areas:
E Site Visit
Inspection Summary:
Phone: [phone] Ext.703
PCN indicates about 20.5% impervious, which may be a bit suspect, although my plans were small and difficult to read. This
apparently includes a portion of yet undeveloped land located south of lots 56-41. Approved storm water management plan should be
condition of any approval (or demonstration that it is not required...??) Ad info letter has asked for individual lot/site plans. This should
specifically include lots 55 and 56. There is considerable deep fill on these lots, right up to the WL line. How will the WL be maintained
after the sale? Other lots that are obviously marginal are 43&40 (mostly wet. How will WL be maintained? What provisions will be
made to maintain WL on lots 28&29?
Recommend approval ONLY after these issues have been resolved.
Version: 1 Status: On Hold
Project Type: Residential Subdivision
Region: Fayetteville
Longitude: -78°55'08"
Title: Owner
Phone: [phone]
Entry Time: 09:00 AM Exit Time: 09:45 AM
Inspection Type: Staff Report
Page: 1

Project Num: 20090951 Owner: Koenig, John
Inspection Date: 09/10/2009 Inspection Type: Staff Report Reason for Visit: Routine
Site Visit Yes No NA NE
Do impacts described in the application differ those seen in the field? n ¦ n n
If yes, please describe differences:
Are the Intermittent/Perennial calls different in the application? n n ¦ o
If yes, please describe differences, and how mitigation ratios are affected:
Are there additional impacts not described in the application? n ¦ n n
If yes, please describe and quantify:
Were the impacts in place prior to the application for the 401 Certification? n ¦ n o
Additional conditions recommended for the Certification:
Recommended project modifications:
Is this a modification request to an existing Certification? n ¦ n n
Are there additional stromwater conditions that should be required due to the following classifications: n ¦ n n
# 303(d)list, Class WS, NSW, ORW, HQW
Describe:
Is this a subdivision or otherwise part of a larger project? ¦ n n n
# If yes, what phase is this?
Are there prior impacts from prior phases? n ¦ n Q
If yes, what are the cumulative imacts for this project? no previous impacts observed
Possible secondary impacts noted:
Comment:
Page: 2