WQ0006317_Regional Office Historical File Pre 2016

NOTE TO FILE — 12/10/2015
On December 8, 2015 Jim Gonsiewski of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR),
Winston-Salem Regional Office received a call from Faron Leigh, ORC for Colonial Pipeline. Mr.
Leigh stated that the laboratory analytical results for the November 2015 groundwater sampling event
indicated a 2L exceedance in MW$ for Nitrate (14 mg/L).

AVA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Pat McCrory Donald van der Vaart
Governor Secretary
August 26, 2015
Mr. Don Gardner, Operations Manager
Colonial Pipeline Company
411 Gallimore Dairy Road
Greensboro, NC 27409
Subject: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Colonial Pipeline, Wastewater Irrigation System
Permit No. WQ0006317
Guilford County
Dear Mr. Gardner:
On July 29, 2015 staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources (DWR), Winston-Salem Regional
Office performed a compliance evaluation inspection of the subject facility. This inspection was conducted
by DWR representative Jim Gonsiewski. The compliance inspection report for this inspection is enclosed for
your review. A separate DWR office file review of the Non-Discharge Monitoring Reports (NDMR), Non-
Discharge Application Reports (NDAR), and GW-59 reports for the period of May 2014 through July 2015
was also conducted.
While the majority of the inspection reflects compliance with the permit, GW-59 reports indicate
exceedances of some NC Groundwater Quality Standards found in 15A NCAC 02L .0202(g). The following
monitoring well groundwater parameters were reported in excess of NC Groundwater Quality Standards:
1. Nitrate was reported above the 02 L limit of 10 mg/L for MW-1B in the March 2015 GW-59 report.
2. Chromium was reported above the 02 L limit of 0.01 mg/L for MW-1B in the November 2014 and
July 2015 GW-59 reports and for MW-2 in the July 2015 GW-59 report. Groundwater sampling
should be monitored closely and care taken in using proper sampling techniques to ensure a
representative sample.
3. As required by Permit Condition IV.13.d., the conditions listed above were not reported to the DWR
WSRO within 24 hours. Please ensure that any future exceedances or permit variations are reported
to the WSRO within this time frame.
In addition to the above listed exceedances, the following item of concern requires your attention and action
as well:
The following NDMR and NDAR forms were incorrectly completed. The May 2014 NDAR was annotated
that no irrigation was conducted in Field 1 while the form lists that the field was irrigated on May 16th. The
450 W.Hanes Mill Road,Suite 300,Winston-Salem,North Carolina 27105
Phone:[phone] FAX:[phone] Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
Internet:www.ncdenr.gov-www.ncwater.org
An Equal Opportunity l Affirmative Action Employer

NDMRs for August 2014, September 2014, May 2015, and June 2015 were noted as "no flow generated"
while flow was listed on the reports. The June 2015 NDAR was annotated that no irrigation was conducted
while the form lists irrigation events for all three fields during the month. Both the yes and no irrigation
boxes were checked for Field 1 on the July 2015 NDAR. In the future, please ensure that all forms are
correctly completed.
Our office appreciates your prompt attention to the above listed item of concern. Please refer to the enclosed
compliance inspection report for additional observations and comments. If you or your staff have any
questions concerning this letter, please contact me or Jim Gonsiewski at [phone] or via email at
[e-mail].
Sincerely,
/1-K �,_ V-
Sherri V. Knight, P. E.
Assistant Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Division of Water Resources,NCDENR - WSRO
enc.: Compliance Inspection Report
cc: Faron Leigh, ORC — Colonial Pipeline Company 411 Gallimore Dairy Road Greensboro NC 27409
Guilford County Environmental He- th

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: WQ0006317 Effective: 10/01/14 Expiration: 09/30/19 Owner: Colonial Pipeline Company
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Greensboro Junction
County:Guilford 411 Gallimore Dairy Rd
Region: Winston-Salem
Greensboro NC 274099726
Contact Person: Todd W Daniel Title: Operations Manager Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications: SI,
Primary ORC: Faron Dale Leigh Certification: 14891 Phone: [phone]
Secondary ORC(s):
On-Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 07/29/2015 Entry Time: 10:20AM Exit Time: 12:15PM
Primary Inspector: Jim J Gonsiewski Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Wastewater Irrigation
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant Not Compliant
Question Areas:
1. Treatment Flow Measurement-Effluent Treatment Flow Measurement-Influent II Miscellaneous Questions
▪ Treatment Flow Measurement-Water Treatment II Treatment Barscreen
Use Records
1111 Treatment Filters • Record Keeping Treatment Lagoons
1. End Use-Irrigation II Treatment Influent Pump Station Treatment Clarifiers
▪ Treatment Disinfection 1. Treatment Flow Measurement Storage
▪ Standby Power 1. Wells
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

pennit W00006317 Owner-Facility:Colonial Pipeline Company
Inspection Date: 07/29/2015 Inspection Type:Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
On July 29,2015 staff of the North Carolina Division of Water Resources(DWR),Winston-Salem Regional Office performed
a compliance evaluation inspection of the subject facility. This inspection was conducted by DWR representative Jim
Gonsiewski.A separate DWR office file review of the Non-Discharge Monitoring Reports(NDMR), Non-Discharge
Application Reports(NDAR), and GW-59 reports for the period of May 2014 through July 2015 was also conducted.
While the majority of the inspection reflects compliance with the permit, GW-59 reports indicate exceedances of some NC
Groundwater Quality Standards found in 15A NCAC 02L.0202(g). The following monitoring well groundwater parameters
were reported in excess of NC Groundwater Quality Standards:
1.Nitrate was reported above the 02 L limit of 10 mg/L for MW-1 B in the March 2015 GW-59 report.
2.Chromium was reported above the 02 L limit of 0.01 mg/L for MW-1 B in the November 2014 and July 2015 GW-59 reports
and for MW-2 in the July 2015 GW-59 report.
3.As required by Permit Condition IV.13.d.,the conditions listed above were not reported to the DWR WSRO within 24
hours.
In addition to the above listed exceedances,the following item of concern was noted:
The following NDMR and NDAR forms were incorrectly completed. The May 2014 NDAR was annotated that no irrigation
was conducted in Field 1 while the form lists that the field was irrigated on May 16th. The NDMRs for August 2014,
September 2014, May 2015, and June 2015 were noted as"no flow generated"while flow was listed on the reports. The
June 2015 NDAR was annotated that no irrigation was conducted while the form lists irrigation events for all three fields
during the month. Both the yes and no irrigation boxes were checked for Field 1 on the July 2015 NDAR.
Page: 2

Permit: WO0006317 Owner-Facility:Colonial Pipeline Company
Inspection Date: 07/29/2015 Inspection Type:Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Type, Yes No NA NE
Reuse(Quality) El
Lagoon Spray,LR ❑
Infiltration System ❑
Activated Sludge Spray,LR ❑
Single Family Spray,LR El
Activated Sludge Drip,LR El
Single Family Drip El
Recycle/Reuse El
Activated Sludge Spray, HR •
Treatment Yes No NA NE
Are Treatment facilities consistent with those outlined in the current permit? • El El El
Do all treatment units appear to be operational?(if no,note below.) • El El El
Comment:
Treatment Influent Pump Station Yes No NA NE
Is the pump station free of bypass lines or structures? • El ❑ El
Is the general housekeeping acceptable? • El El El
Are all pumps present? • El El ❑
Are all pumps operable? • El El El
Are floats/controls operable? • El El El
Are audio and visual alarms available? • El El El
Are audio and visual alarms operational? El El El
#Are SCADA/Telemetry alarms required? El El • El
Are SCADA/Telemetry available? El El • El
Are SCADA/Telemetry operational? El El • El
Comment:
Treatment Flow Measurement-Influent Yes No NA NE
Is flowmeter calibrated annually? El El • El
Is flowmeter operating properly? El El El
Does flowmeter monitor continuously? El El • El
Does flowmeter record flow? El El IN El
Does flowmeter appear to monitor accurately? El El
Comment:
Treatment Flow Measurement-Water Use Records Yes No NA NE
Page: 3

permit WO0006317 Owner-Facility:Colonial Pipeline Company
Inspection Date: 07/29/2015 Inspection Type:Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Is water use metered? • ❑ ❑ El
Are the daily average values properly calculated? • El CI El
Comment:
Treatment Flow Measurement-Effluent
Yes No NA NE
Is flowmeter calibrated annually? El El
Is flowmeter operating properly? El El
Does flowmeter monitor continuously? El ❑
Does flowmeter record flow? • ❑ El ❑
Does flowmeter appear to monitor accurately? • El El
Comment:
Standby Power
Yes No NA NE
Is automatically activated standby power available? • El ❑ ❑
Is generator tested weekly by interrupting primary power source? • El 0 ❑
Is generator operable? • ❑ El El
Does generator have adequate fuel? • El El ❑
Comment:
Treatment Barscreen Yes No NA NE
Is it free of excessive debris? El ❑
Is disposal of screenings in compliance? ❑
Are the bars spaced properly? • El El ❑
Is the unit in good condition? • El El ❑
Comment:
Treatment Clarifiers Yes No NA NE
Are the weirs level? MI ❑ ❑ El
Are the weirs free of solids and algae? • El El El
Is the scum removal system operational? El
Is the scum removal system accessible? El El
Is the sludge blanket at an acceptable level? • El El El
Is the effluent from the clarifier free of excessive solids? • El El El
Comment:
Treatment Filters
Yes No NA NE
Is the filter media present? El El
Is the filter media the correct size and type? El
Is the air scour operational? El
Is the scouring acceptable? • El El El
Page: 4

O vi N D D vi D D D > w 7.1 C) 0 -.. N D -.. N N -.• N N 0 N .� C) 0 CT N
O co C0 (D m <0 iD m m m m c�i m m m m rn C C m m s m — — 0 m 0 m 7 7
a a < ? O O 3 0 O 3 N N N N - G G co N co co CD
a) CD CD
CDcr) m m 30 Z 3 CD 0a Cl) m m m <° a N m a) o °) (o < <D 3 °� c 7
N 0 N O C a w
.7+ (n > co 3 7 hi N N 0 O O !D 7 7 7 7 co y N (D 0 Cr fU 7. 7 , fD N w fD .. 7
r.0 °' m o o_' cn N X =' 2 '' f F v,' c y m v — — 3 c 0 3 O .. N m o
7 a N U) a O O J O N S O' N < fU 3 N o p 0 (D 'O 0 - cn 7' — -
7 Q - O 7
N =' r N co N N En fD N O 7 _, fD f° f1 3' C Q 7 0 0 3 f0 p 7 j' _'. IC
o a 2 Co d , m N N o 7 'O N 3 '. `NG m < f CD CD n � `<' N Q• ] '-c y' (p - rn d 3
d O < •• 5 5 N _ N 7. p_ O C1 O O ..
fD N fl) f)7 N 7 U 1 fD g -
_ O N 7 °) fU U N CD CD q) C TT; O 7 fD `� 7 (D 'J C! d
O N 7 -S fD (O O_ 7 7 73 g S rn c
N `G Q fD (D fNii (D 3 3• N 0 C O fD O
y N o °) a n (CD 00. 00. N - co -0 x � fli N N N (S (p - Gt• p' C 7 cD ((xp� �x -- p
CD CD g `� E) 7 (D V °) .� D N < N N .7. J d O _� N n (/) N p
X .O < °) C 0. cll. fD 7 d j N �' d (DJ (o 5' 3 o. y G' N IQ o rn
d p = C) p 3. CD CD
a °) O N fD cp a J CD CD CT
z cr N CD (D Z an O3 co fD a 3 �i N O N N
C) 0 O 0 C - a a 0 J C Q 3 O •J •J cn O Q °) 'O II fD N Q Q V
7 _. �. f0 CD 7 fD W f1 a
O N N O O .Z1 7 (D d •
ID a N O N N N
a .J a f f 'J at _ 7 rn .J N N 3 -0 m ro •J
fU N as 'O C 'J 'J (D 0 °) fy O fU 7' N a
O_ Z 7 7 U) (p C
p. co N N 0. .J C 7 N 0. (O .J CD a N
(3 * _ 3 _ 3 0 0 (o fD v U. m
J J (D CD '� N 7 C)CT O N J N 3
(r 7 07 0 _a _ C�
N - 0 J O 7 N 7 2
O J J co
O N
C O . N (�)
Q Q "t
3 O J p
7 y
CD $ •fD •� n.
a D A
o o
Z 3 0
o -o 2.
m d
v 7
N 8 1
0 m 7m
m o
`) 0 3
7 U
d
7
z
m
d
0
O
7
i
1!
l
Pi
❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ fA ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ■ ■ ■ ❑ ❑ ■ ■ ■ ■ M ❑ ❑ ❑ o
■ ■ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ _ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ z ❑ ❑ ❑
(D. ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ z ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ z ❑ ■ ■
01 000000000000 m m
❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ ❑ ❑

Permit: WQ0006317 Owner-Facility:Colonial Pipeline Company
Inspection Date: 07/29/2015 Inspection Type:Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Are annual soil reports available? 111 0 0 ❑
#Are PAN records required? ❑ • 0 0
#Did last soil report indicate a need for lime? ❑ • ❑ ❑
If so,has it been applied? ❑ ❑
Are operational logs present? • 0 0 ❑
Are lab sheets available for review? • 0 0 ❑
Do lab sheets support data reported on NDMR? • ❑ ❑
Do lab sheets support data reported on GW-59s? MOOD
Are Operational and Maintenance records present? • ❑ ❑
Were Operational and Maintenance records complete? MI ❑ ❑ ❑
Has permittee been free of public complaints in last 12 months? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
Is a copy of the SOC readily available? 0 0 MI ❑
No treatment units bypassed since last inspection? • ❑ ❑ 0
Comment: See comments
End Use-Irriqation Yes No NA NE
Are buffers adequate? 11 0 ❑ ❑
Is the cover crop type specified in permit? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the crop cover acceptable? ❑
Is the site condition adequate? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the site free of runoff/ponding? 11 ❑ 0
Is the acreage specified in the permit being utilized? • 0 ❑ ❑
Is the application equipment present? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the application equipment operational? • ❑ ❑
Is the disposal field free of limiting slopes? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is access restricted and/or signs posted during active site use? • ❑ ❑ CI
Are any supply wells within the CB? ❑
Are any supply wells within 250' of the CB? ❑ • ❑ ❑
How close is the closest water supply well? 0 0 CI
Is municipal water available in the area? ❑
#Info only:Does the permit call for monitoring wells? • ❑ 0 ❑
Are GW monitoring wells located properly w/respect to RB and CB? • ❑ 0
Are GW monitoring wells properly constructed,including screened interval? • ❑ El ❑
Are monitoring wells damaged? ❑ 0
Comment: See comments
Page: 6

North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Section
NON—DISCHARGE COMPLIANCE INSPECTION REPORT
WASTEWATER IRRIGATION
General Information
r
Facility Name:CoL D n t rx CZ_ Q•
� �,� �� n County: � l,i C
Permit No.: WQ00-0E) Issuance Date: ( I$j V4
Owner: Co .0 vt i a ( �L<< r 2 Expiration Date: p,
ORC Name: '�- 'p r e 12 Telephone No.:3 3(9 -(.R (Q 1 -7Q 0
Backup ORC: ©KYV Cc t , Telephone No.:
Other Contact: Telephone No.:
Location(address,gnss o�r dtir`ecttions): 1 l ►^'v�'a De& ��an �9!`e c YES ram /
Reason for Inspection
is 'OUTINE ❑ FOLLOW-UP ❑ COMPLAINT ❑ PERMITTING ❑ Other:
omments (attach additional pages as necessary)
d• -"c6-( V-5 C bo rv\) s u 4=0
*-CP,K+fy.e Crn os4-4 Eck 1 `I-v I ‘k-AN
0. r k-•,. Q-9 to I i 2cx- b(61)
k"( )1 () ° (k+ I A%\ p r \qot
rizepirrie ,-- <7; po Y‘-• Lek
\ ns vU ts-
Co wv yvvc,-,44 evc3
rnC t c_a r\ C►C_s
•
4C RAIN c v
C"\-- - k_(_5(, ,ceQ
&--1\_r 0 -r(l *tsr\'‘.Q b
(No kck. rg `'c t �-/� j ✓�- �.," ' p `J� V ) c(�STO c�c�g c((
NO/ G1 r S`JY etkyv\f( � c� ^ q
Is a follow-up inspection necessary ❑ Yes No
Primary Inspector:i 1 IrA30 n5I (Ct Secondary Inspector:
Date of Inspections(c// (i Entry Time: IC) 0 Exit Time: /a i �S"�

Non-Discharge Compliance Inspection Report
Record Keeping and Reporting Information Y N NA NE
Is current permit available upon request? M ❑ ❑ ❑
Has the facility been free of public complaints for the last 12 months? g. ❑ ❑ ❑
Are maintenance and inspection logs present(date&time of inspections, visual observations,
any maintenance(adjustments, cleanings, equip changes) or repairs taken)? N. ❑ ❑ ❑
Are weekly freeboard records present? 1M- ❑ >3 ❑
Are irrigation tracking records present(date, weather, volume, length time,field#,
Hydraulic loading, nutrient loading, other)? ❑ ❑
Has irrigation equipment been calibrated(once/permit cycle)&records present? ❑ ❑ ❑
Are records present for residuals removal (date, volume, Residual Hauler Name,
Name/permit of the receiving party or letter from Municipality)? ❑ ❑ JE ❑
Is an Operation& Maintenance Plan, and Spill Plan present? Li ❑ ❑
Effluent Monitoring:
Were effluent monitoring reports present? F_WMR (,NDAR NDMLR r ❑ ❑ ❑
Are flow rates less than permitted flow? Permitted Flow: c 6CI CI CI
Are application rates adhered to? Permitted Rate: C.C. lSin^2 1. CI ❑
Are lab sheets available for review and support monitoring reports? p ❑ ❑ ❑
Are samples analyzed for the required parameters(See permit)? XI ❑ ❑
Effluent concentrations do NOT exceed 2L GW standards? `❑ Nt ❑ ❑
If required, are PAN records present and complete? ❑ ® El
Groundwater Monitoring: / \
Is groundwater monitoring required? 0. ❑
Were GW-59's and lab results present? , ❑ ❑ ❑
Were samples analyzed for the required parameters(See permit)? ►: ❑ ❑ ❑
Observed records indicate no 2L GW quality violations? ❑ , ❑ ❑
Soil Analysis:
Were annual soil analyses results present for each irrigation field? ❑ ❑ ❑
If lime was called for on the Agronomist report,was lime applied? ❑ ❑ ❑
Copper and Zinc indices: , <2,000 ❑ 2,000—3,000 ❑ >3,000
Was Sodium less than 0.5 meq/100 cm3 ? ❑ i1 j ❑
Was Exchangeable Sodium Percentage(ESP) less than 15% ? ❑ ❑
Influent Pump Station(s) ❑Check box if component is listed in permit description. Y N NA NE
All pumps present, operational 4 ❑ ❑ ❑
Floats/Controls operable ❑ ❑ ❑
Audio&Visual Alarms Operational 7 ❑ ❑ ❑
Free of bypass lines or structures 7 ❑ ❑ ❑
General housekeeping good ►�� CI CI CI
Back-up power available, routinely tested & fueled? 'i ❑ ❑ ❑
Treatment Barscreen ❑Check box if component is listed in permit description. Y N NA NE
Are bars spaced properly& free of excess debris? '► ❑ ❑ ❑
Are screenings disposed of properly? r.
41i. ❑ ❑ ❑
Is unit in good condition(excess corrosion)? il. ❑ ❑ ❑
Equalization Basin ❑ Check box if component is listed in permit description. Y N NA NE
Is aeration present? ❑ CI
Are pumps present and operational? ❑ CI CIIs unit in good general condition? ❑ ❑ ❑
Page 2of4

Non-Discharge Compliance Inspection Report
Treatment Activated Sludge ❑Check box if component is listed in permit description. Y N N NE
Aeration mechanism operable& accessible? ❑ El ❑
Aeration basin thoroughly mixed? ❑ ❑ ❑
Settleometer& dissolved oxygen results acceptable? ❑ ❑ ❑
Is sludge an acceptable color? ❑ ❑ ❑
Residual Stora.e_ reatment Y N NA NE
"Va.,agoon asin n Septic Tank Capacity(gallons):
If Septic Tank, is a sanitary T or filter present? ❑ ❑ ❑
How often are residuals pumped?
Treatment Filter(s) ❑ Check box if component is listed in permit description. Y N NA NE
Is unit accessible for review(i.e. inspection port or not subsurface)? If ❑
Is the filter media present,correct size&type? /� ❑ ❑ ❑
Is mud well free of excess solids and filter media? !► : ❑ ❑
Is media free of ponding, algae or excess vegetation? Ki ❑ ❑
Is clear well free of excess solids and filter media? II ❑ ❑
Does backwashing/air scour frequency appear adequate? `7`\ ❑ ❑
Treatment Clarifiers ❑ Check box if component is listed in permit description. Y N NA NE_
Weirs level, free of excessive solids& algae? ❑ ❑ ❑
Scum removal system operational and accessible? ❑ ❑ t. ❑
Sludge blanket at acceptable level? ❑ ❑ 'n ❑
Clarifier effluent free of excessive solids? ❑ ❑ ❑
Treatment Disinfection
Type: ❑ Tablets n Gas ❑ Liquid n UV Y N NA NE
Is the system properly maintained and working? ❑ ❑ XI ❑
Fecal coliform results indicate proper disinfection? ❑ ❑ ❑
Adequate detention time (>30 minutes)? ❑ ❑ ❑
If tablets, proper size&type? ❑ ❑ I ❑
Present in Cylinder(s)? El El
If UV bulbs,are replacement bulbs on hand? ❑ ❑ ❑
Is contact chamber free of sludge, solids and growth? ❑ ❑ ❑
Flow Measurement
Flowmeter location: /S Influent ❑ Effluent Y N NA NE
Is flowmeter calibrated annually(design flow>10,000 gpd)? ❑ ❑ 2 ❑
Is flowmeter operating properly? , ❑ ❑
Does flowmeter record flow? ❑ El
no flowmeter(<10,000 gpd), are water-use records available(water meter)? ❑ e ❑
Are the daily average values properly calculated? ❑ ❑ ❑
Treatment Y N NA NE
Are treatment facilities consistent with those outlined in permit? ❑ ❑ ❑
Do all treatment units appear to be operational? If no,note below. ❑ ❑ ❑
List any items/units):
Page 3 of 4

Non-Discharge Compliance Inspection Report
Effluent Stora e
agoon(s) ❑ Above ground tank(s) ❑ Underground tank(s) [Other:
mount of Storage(days,months, gallons, etc.):
Effluent Storage Lagoon(s) ❑ Primary n Secondary Y N NA NE
Influent structure(s) free of obstructions? 2. ❑ ❑ ❑
No signs of seepage, overtopping, down cutting or erosion on embankments? `i ❑ ❑ ❑
Proper vegetation type w/no excessive vegetation present on embankments? 1/ ❑ ❑ ❑
Liner(if visible, is it intact)? rg, ❑ ❑ ❑
Baffles/curtains in good condition? ❑ ❑ )K ❑
Freeboard is>2 feet from overtopping? Measurement at time of inspection: ❑ ❑ 1 ❑
Staff gauge is clearly marked? ❑ ❑ ►�� ❑
No evidence of overflow(vegetation discolored or laying down/broken)? IN ❑ ❑ ❑
No unusual color(very black,textile colors)? Ei ❑ ❑ ❑
No Foam present? Are antifoam agents used?0 Yes 0 No 171 ❑ ❑ ❑
No floating mats(sludge,plants, inorganics)? N ❑ ❑ ❑
No signs of excessive solids buildup(from bottom)? PI ❑ ❑ ❑
Aerators/mixers operational (if present)? d ❑ ❑ ❑
Effluent structure is free of obstructions and easily accessible? . ❑ ❑ ❑
Effluent Pump station Y N NA NE
All pumps present, operational N. ❑ ❑ ❑
Floats/Controls operable Et ❑ ❑ ❑
Audio&Visual Alarms Operational El ❑ ❑ ❑
Free of bypass lines or structures 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
If required, is a rain sensor present and operational ::: ❑ ❑
General housekeeping good 11, ❑ ❑
Back-up power I ❑ ❑ ❑
End Use-Irrigation Number of Fields:3 Y N NA NE
Are buffers adequate? ❑ ❑ ❑
Are cover crops the type specified in permit and/or in good condition? ❑ ❑ ❑
No signs of runoff,ponding, or drift? la CI ❑ CIIs the acreage specified in the permit being utilized? H CI CIIs the application equipment present, operational, and in good condition? ❑ ❑
R,
No limiting slopes present in irrigation fields? ❑ ❑ ❑
Is site access restricted and/or signs posted in accordance with permit? ❑ CI CI
No water supply wells within the CB? ‘,4 ❑ ❑ ❑
No water supply wells within 250' of the CB? X ❑ ❑ ❑
Is permit being followed? ❑ ❑ ❑
Groundwater Monitoring Wells Y N NA NE
Does the permit require monitoring wells?If so, answer the following. ❑
Are the monitoring wells properly installed according to the permit? 4 ❑ ❑ ❑
Are the monitoring wells located properly w/respect to RB &CB? 4 ❑ CI
Are the wells properly identified& free of damage? , ❑ ❑ ❑
Page 4 of 4

NDMR REVIEW SHEET
PERMIT NUMBER: WQ0006317 FACILITY NAME: Colonial Pipeline
COUNTY: Guilford TYPE: Spray Irrigation REVIEW PERIOD:3,,aO o ►v(ct ,C
Parameter Freq. Limit C or "�/y �Qr q/ (r� I pf )� �J�, is- •� �7�
Flow X Monthly 7,140 Cont. .0 © {a! T \ 0 C
9pd !'/ V v v
pH* X 3xyr G EC. ?).
TRC
BOD5 X 3xyr C C zJ
NH3-N X 3xyr C g
TSS X 3xyr C 6
Fecak ro+. X 3 x yr G "y
DO
TDS
Conductivity
Temp.
COD
TOC
Phenols
O&G
NO2&NO3 X 3-x yr-
NO3 7Z 3X3r G cl,1
TN
TKN X 3xyr G 3a�y
TP X 3xyr G c3,abg
Chloride X 3 x yr G Va7
Sulfide
SAR X 3xyr
As
B
Cd
Ca X 3xyr
Cr
Cu
Pb _
Mg X 3xyr G <S—
Hg
Ni
K
Na X 3xyr G sop.
Zn
Oil & Grease X 3 x yr G cc—
Comments:

NDAR REVIEW SHEET
PERMIT NUMBER: WO0006317 FACILITY NAME: Colonial Pipeline
COUNTY: Guilford TYPE:Sprav Irrigation REVIEW PERIOD am l'1' to —
Storage Freeboard(>2 feet)Y or N �'Rate �`—
per Hourly YearlyRate (SIN �/� g � (/�/f� f4j �c1/ �/ y/s
Field Acres croCov /I I yl �/S y/
01 1.30 Fescue 0.15" 33.75" 6 U ,O r _ C)
C7 V
1.09 Fescue 0.15" 33.75"
02 b 0 0 DO 0 a b 6
03 1.30 Fescue 0.15" 33.75" c) p V . v
Comments:

111.1
Monitoring Well Da iew Sheet
PERMIT NUMBER: WQ0006317 FACILITY NAME: Colonial Pipeline
COUNTY: Guilford TYPE:Spray Irrigation REVIEW FIERIOD AI a014 toN v ad`f
Nouaoi q- 1
Parameter Standard MW MW MW MW MW MW MW MW MW MW MW MW I
(mg/L) ( lB 2 5A 6 7 e�.9 t 1 B 2 5A 6 7 9
Water level X tasS'9,�1- .1R•98 �.7 L i 'I J f1.'(3 QQN a►r 1
COD a3 dd`� 774{,�'ot.(
Col. Fecal 1/100m1
Col. Total •
TDS X 500 -76 , ' 3O 1 s-s-2 33-i $ .SO
pH X 6.5-8.5 .5,( $,SI gs-c-lS 6.0
TOC 10 lc,a(
Chloride X 250 28, Q4,S rd(- s �� t�(�,S C j �3� 31,4 ��, ?9,) �-
DO
As 0.010
O&G
Phenols 0.30
Sulfate 250
Specific Cond.NH3 X 1.5" i o cr NR L ��y�,
N0iIR L r3R LB k - 4 f.'
41) TKN as N
NO2 fl,6
NO3 X 10 Atc ,-I3 J C/, a cam '3(f 3.06 134, gO t
TP
Orthophospate
Al
Ba 2.0
Ca
Cd 0.Q05 j3(Z( QZ
Cr,Total 0.
Cu 1.0
Fe _ 0.3
Hg _ 0.0011
K _
Mg
Mn 0.05
Na
Ni 0.1
Pb 0.015 8'h- L ellqt
Zn 2.1 ,OQ .OS-41
NH3 as N
Xylenes
Volatile Compounds:one of the methods below
VOC 6230 0.5 ug/L
VOC 6210 X 0.5 ug/L eAR\ dR L 131
EPA 8021 0.5 ug/L
EPA 8261 0.5 ug/L
VOC EPA 602 0.53 mg/L
*Ammonia Standard is IMAC (Interim Maximum Allowable Concentration)

Ng OOD (0 3 I-4- Cob 'tal 4)• '
tv\v\) if,,,tioAs.
. . ,
I
•.: . .
'
-,fe.- - '- -
--„„-
_
,:...„-•, ...-_-?,---- • \ ...._
. . ,
1...—..., mw-
' ' •MW-9 ---••• ,.,
.,, -.. • — k
, ••,-7i)
'Spray Field 3
• gip.. -_,•... , i 46 _
...
i ‘..-• #.
,,'
1 ._,
--
/ : ---,_,...2.(, ..:- /1,
;.• 1 I .......
* •...
M 111)-7 .
..i. - /
tr •-
.. Is . , i . 4LIFid Application F,ielo
1
)
MW-5 ,----7 _-------::2---
,
int.A 1-
(,,
, .
_ 4Spray'-'Fieldi1-______
.i. ,•.
f- EiSpray Field 2 MW.--1--------_ - - --j,
••._
•
. .
• ,
_._
;;'-‘ ',IV', — '''' '31P'l 1 •14'1'
4._
02014 Google ..
Goog,le earth
0
Google earth feet 800
A
meters' 200
•

WELL ABANDONMENT RECORD For Internal Use ONLY:
This form can be used for single or multiple wells
1.Well Contractor Information: WELL ABANDONMENT DETAILS
JACOB MESSICK 1
7a.Number of wells being abandoned:
Well Contractor Name(or well owner personally abandoning well on his/her property) For multiple injection or non-water supply wells ONLY with the same
constructioniabandonment,you can submit one form.
B-4252
NC Well Contractor Certification Number 7b.Approximate volume of water remaining in well(s): 1.0 (gal.)
GEOLOGIC EXPLORATION, INC FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY:
Company Name 7c.Type of disinfectant used:
2.Well Construction Permit#:
List all applicable well construction permits(.e.County,State,Variance,etc.)lfknown 7d.Amount of disinfectant used:
3.Well use(check well use):
Water Supply Well: 7e.Sealing materials used(check all that apply):
❑Agricultural ❑Municipal/Public O Neat Cement Grout 0 Bentonite Chips or Pellets
❑Geothermal(Heating/Cooling Supply) ❑Residential Water Supply(single) 0 Sand Cement Grout 0 Dry Clay
❑lndustrial/Commercial ❑Residential Water Supply(shared) 0 Concrete Grout 0 Drill Cuttings
Obligation 0 Specialty Grout 0 Gravel
Non-Water Supply Well: 0 Bentonite Slurry 0 Other(explain under 7g)
2lMonitoring ❑Recovery
Injection Well: 7L For each material selected above,provide amount of materials used:
❑Aquifer Recharge ❑Groundwater Remediation 5.0 GALLONS
❑Aquifer Storage and Recovery ❑Salinity Barrier
❑Aquifer Test ❑Stonmwater Drainage
❑Experimental Technology ❑Subsidence Control 7g.Provide a brief description of the abandonment procedure:
❑Geothermal(Closed Loop) ❑Tracer WELL ABANDONED VIA TREMIE PIPE WITH
❑Geothermal(Heating/Cooling Return) ❑Other(explain under 7g)
PORTLAND BENTONITE SLURRY
4.Date well(s)abandoned: 07/0$/14 " 9 7f 114 •
5a.Well location: fl
COLONIAL PIPELINE
Facility/Owner Name Facility IDb(if applicable) 8.Cer'tifica 4
411 GALLIMORE DAIRY ROAD GREENSBORO 27409 07/18/14
Physical Address,City,and Zip Signature of Certified Well Contractor or Well Owner Date
GUILFORD By signing this form, 1 hereby cert fy that the well(s)was(were)abandoned in
County Parcel Identification No.(PIN) accordance with I5A NCAC 02C.0100 or 2C.0200 Well Construction Standards
and that a copy of this record has been provided to the well owner.
5b.Latitude and longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees:
(dwell field,one lat/long is sufficient) 9.Site diagram or additional well details:
36° 04'09.60" 78° 56'46.64" You may use the back of this page to provide additional well site details or well
1V W abandonment details. You may also attach additional pages if ne'ce sary.
CONSTRUCTION DETAILS OF WELL(S)BEING ABANDONED SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS
Attach well construction record(s)if available. For multiple injection or non-water supply
wells ONLY with the same construction/abandonment,you can submit one form. 10a. For All Wells: Submit this form within 30 days of completion of well
MW-8 •
abandonment to the following:
6a.Well ID#:
Division of Water Quality,Information Processing Unit,
6b.Total well depth 31.0 (ft.) 1617 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,NC 27699-1617
10b.For Infection Wells: In addition to sending the form to the address in 10a
6e.Borehole diameter: 2.0 (in.) above,also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of completion of well
abandonment to the following:
6d.Water level below ground surface: 24.0 (ft) Division of Water Quality,Underground Injection Control Program,
1636 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,NC 27699-1636
•6e.Outer casing length(if known): (ft.) the
For Water Supply&Infection Wells: In addition to sending the form to
the address(es) above,also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of
completion of well abandonment to the county health department of the county
6f.Inner casing/tubing length(if known): (ft.) where abandoned.
6g.Screen length(if known): (ft.)
Form GW-30 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources-Division of Water Quality Revised March 2013

WELL CONSTRUCTION RECORD For Internal Use ONLY:
This form can be used for single or multiple wells t l]
I.Well Contractor Information:
JACOB MESSICK 4.WATERZONEs <:
FROM TO DESCRIPTION
Well Contractor Name ft. ft.
B-4252 ft. ft. '
NC Well Contractor Certification Number IS.OUTER CASING(for multi-cased wells)OR LINER(Ilan licabk) .
FROM TO DIAMETER THICKNESS MATERIAL
GEOLOGIC EXPLORATION, INC ft. R•-
Company Name ,16.INNER CASING OR TUBING Geothermal closed-loop) -,
FROM TO DIAMETER THICKNESS MATERIAL
2.Well Construction Permit#: 0.0 fL 21.0 R. 2.0 'n' SCH 40 PVC
List all applicable well construction permits(i.e.County,State,Variance,etc.) •
is
ft. f.
3.Well Use(check well use): 17:SCitEEN ..
Water Supply Well: FROM TO DIAMETER SLOT SIZE THICKNESS MATERIAL
❑Agricultural ❑Municipal/Public 21.0 ft. 31.0 k 2.0 m .010 SCH 40 PVC
❑Geothermal(Heating/CoolingSu I ❑Residential Water Supply(single) ft fL in.
Supply) uPP Y( � ;. -...
❑lndustrial/Commercial ❑Residential Water Supply(shared) I8.GROUT'
FROM TO MATERIAL EMPLACEMENT METHOD&AMOUNT
❑Irrigation 0.0 B' 17.0 ft. poenµDeEMrvRe SLURRY
Non-Water Supply Well: ft. ft.
(Monitoring ❑Recovery
Injection Well: ft. ft.
❑Aquifer Recharge ❑Groundwater Remediation 49.:SAND/GRAVEL'PACK(if applicable) ;:- ' :' -"`
PROM TO MATERIAL EMPLACEMENT METHOD
OAquifer Storage and Recovery ❑Salinity Barrier 19.0 ft' 31.0 ft. 20-40 FINE SILICA SAND
❑Aquifer Test ❑Stormwater Drainage K ft.
❑Experimental Technology ❑Subsidence Control
20.DRILLING LOG(attachadditional sheets if aeeasary) - .
❑Geothermal(Closed Loop) ❑Tracer FROM TO DESCRIPTION(colar,hardness,saillrack type,grail am,etc)
❑Geothermal(Heating/Cooling Return) ❑Other(explain under#21 Remarks) 0.0 B' 31.0 f' RED CLAY
07/08/14 MW-9 ft n.
4.Date Well(s)Completed: Well ID# R ft,
Sa.Well Location: ft. R. Jl ll._ 2 (i
?Of4
COLONIAL PIPELINE ft. ft.
Facility/Owner Name Facility ID#(if applicable) ft. ft.
411 GALLIMORE DAIRY ROAD GREENSBORO 27409 ft. ft.
Physical Address,City,and Zip 21:REMARKS. '
GUILFORD BENTONITE SEAL FROM 17.0 TO 19.0 FEET
County Parcel Identification No.(PIN)
5b.Latitude and Longitude in degrees/minutes/seconds or decimal degrees: •
22,Ce ' D: MO'7
(if wen field one lat/long is sufficient) r/rNl� 6
36° 04'09.64" N 78° 56' 46.22" W /1 i((ff���� 07/18/14
Signature of Certified Well Contractor Date
6.Is(are)the well(s): (Permanent or ❑Temporary By signing this form,I hereby certify that the well(s)was(were)constructed in accordance
with 1 SA NCAC 02C.0100 or 1 SA NCAC 02C.0200 Well Construction Standards and that a
7.Is this a repair to an existing well: ❑Yes or IZINo copy of this record has been provided to the well owner.
If this is a repair,fill out known well construction information and explain the nature of the
repair under#21 remarks section or on the back of this form. 23.Site diagram or additional well details:
1 You may use the back of this page to provide additional well site details or well
8.Number of wells constructed: construction details. You may also attach additional pages if necessary.
For multiple injection or non-water supply wells ONLY with the same construction.you can SUBMITTAL INSTUCTIONS
submit one form.
9.Total well depth below land surface: 31.0 (ft.) 24a. For All Wells: Submit this form within 30 days of completion of well
For multiple wells hst all depths if different(example-3@200'and 2@100') construction to the following:
10.Static water level below top of casing 24.0 (ft) Division of Rater Quality,Information Processing Unit,
If water level is above casing,use"+" 1617 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,NC 27699-1617
7.0 24b. For Iniection Wells: In addition to sending the form to the address in 24a
11.Borehole diameter. (in.)
AUGER above, also submit a copy of this form within 30 days of completion of well
12.Well construction method: construction to the following.
(i.e.auger,rotary,cable,direct push,etc.) Division of Water Quality,Underground Injection Control Program,
FOR WATER SUPPLY WELLS ONLY: 1636 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,NC 27699-1636
24c.For Water Supply&Injection Wells: In addition to sending the form to
13a.Yield(gpm) Method of test: the address(es) above,also submit one copy of this form within 30 days of
completion of well construction to the county health department of the county
13b.Disinfection type: Amount where constructed.
Form GW-1 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources-Division of Water Quality Revised Ian.2013

Water Pollution Control System Operator Designation Form
WPCSOCC
NCAC ISA 8G.0201
Permittee Owner/Officer Name: brier,40/ 600./
;te. 40 ,
Mailing Address: /__ /,,/ ',,v,4. e e A,� 4 /
City: 6A—en 'Aj rU State: /}Y( Zip: a?,f7 Phone#:i 1?. ,/4.) 9,J/ - 4,77_
Email address: 74,r,' /�
Signature: �a�C (A/ n� /
Date: 6/ y/2-0l `i
Facility Name: 6•4"n,ds/410,..A, ( , — ,Acteat/ lj� Permit#: _74,/g i i‘, j?
SUBMIT A SEPARATE FORM FOR EACH TYPE SYSTEM!
Facility Tyne/Grade:
Biological WWTP Surface Irrigation _ y
Physical/Chemical Land Application
Collection System
Operator in Responsible Charge(ORC) /
Print Full Name: 4 rot, 4 L '
Certificate Type/Grade/Number: (.3-1' /y43 9/ Work Phone#: ( 114) 6'69-�9D3
Signature: _ ���
�- . Date:
"I certify that I agree to my designation as the Operator in Responsible Charge for the facility noted.I understand and will abide by the rules
and regulations pertaining to the responsibilities of the ORC as set forth in 15A NCAC 08G.0204 and failing to do so can result in Discipliner)
Actions by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission."
Back-Up Operator in Responsible Charge(BU ORC)
Print Full Name: 1-0 Ha Alt L C //I Ill a I-44- A TH
Certificate Type/Grade/Number: S I 2.3 /2 4 Work Phone#: ( 7o 3 ??-5-2 5-7
Signature: 41,-‘. -f. Gj /
Date: /3/20/
"I certify that iree to my designation as a Back-up Operator in Responsible Charge for the facility noted. I understand and will abide by the
rules and regulations pertaining to the responsibilities of the HU ORC as set forth in I5A NCAC 08G.0205 and failing to do so can result in
Disciplinary Actions by the Water Pollution Control System Operators Certification Commission."
mall,fax or email the WPCSOCC 1618 Mall Service Center, Raleigh,NC 27699-1618 Fax: [phone]
original to:
Mall or fax a copy to the Asheville Fayetteville Mooresville Raleigh
appropriate Regional Office: 2090 US Hwy 70 225 Green St 610 E Center Ave 3800 Barren Dr
Swannanoa 28778 Suite 714 Suite 301 Raleigh 27609
Fax:[phone] Fayetteville 28301-5043 Mooresville 28115 Fax:[phone]
Phone:[phone] Fax:[phone] Fax:[phone] Phone:[phone]
Phone:[phone] Phone:[phone]
Washington Wilmington Winston-Salem
943 Washington Sq Mall 127 Cardinal Dr 585 Waughtown St
Washington 27889 Wilmington 28405-2845 Winston-Salem 27107
Fax:[phone] Fax:[phone] Fax:[phone]
Phone:[phone] Phone:[phone] Phone:[phone]
Revised 03-2014

A State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
•
DMslon of Wooer Resources Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Staff Report
To: Non-Discharge Permitting Unit Application No.: WQ0006317
Attn: David Goodrich Regional Login No.:
From: Stephen Berry
Winston-Salem Regional Office
I. GENERAL SITE VISIT INFORMATION
1. Was a site visit conducted? ® Yes or❑No
a. Date of site visit: 05/28/2014
b. Site visit conducted by: Stephen Berry
c. Inspection report attached? ❑ Yes or®No
d. Person contacted: Faron Leigh and their contact information: (336)669- 7903 ext.
e. Driving directions: 1-40 to Gallimore Dairy Road,Greensboro
II. PROPOSED FACILITIES FOR NEW AND MODIFICATION APPLICATIONS
1. Facility Classification: (Please attach completed rating sheet to be attached to issued permit)
2. Are the new treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal system? ❑ Yes or❑No
If no, explain:
3. Are site conditions(soils, depth to water table,etc)consistent with the submitted reports? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑N/A
If no, please explain:
4. Do the plans and site map represent the actual site(property lines,wells,etc.)? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ N/A
If no, please explain:
5. Is the proposed residuals management plan adequate? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑N/A
If no, please explain:
6. Are the proposed application rates(e.g., hydraulic, nutrient)acceptable? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A
If no, please explain:
7. Are there any setback conflicts for proposed treatment, storage and disposal sites? ❑ Yes or❑ No
If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas.
8. Is the proposed or existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑ N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program:
9. For residuals,will seasonal or other restrictions be required? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑N/A
If yes, attach list of sites with restrictions(Certification B)
FORM:WQROSSR 02-14 Page 1 of 4

M.EXISTING FACILITIES FOR MODIFICATION AND RENEWAL APPLICATIONS
1. Are there appropriately certified Operators in Charge(ORCs)for the facility?® Yes ❑ No ❑N/A
ORC: Faron Leigh Certificate#:14891 Backup ORC: Certificate#:
2. Are the design, maintenance and operation of the treatment facilities adequate for the type of waste and disposal
system? ® Yes or❑ No
If no, please explain:
3. Are the site conditions(e.g., soils,topography, depth to water table, etc)maintained appropriately and adequately
assimilating the waste? ® Yes or❑No
If no, please explain:
4. Has the site changed in any way that may affect the permit(e.g., drainage added,new wells inside the compliance
boundary, new development, etc.)? ❑ Yes or®No
If yes,please explain:
5. Is the residuals management plan adequate? ® Yes or❑No
If no,please explain:
6. Are the existing application rates(e.g., hydraulic,nutrient) still acceptable? ® Yes or❑No
If no,please explain:
7. Is the existing groundwater monitoring program adequate? ® Yes❑ No ❑N/A
If no, explain and recommend any changes to the groundwater monitoring program:
8. Are there any setback conflicts for existing treatment, storage and disposal sites? ❑ Yes or®No
If yes, attach a map showing conflict areas.
9. Is the description of the facilities as written in the existing permit correct? ® Yes or❑ No
If no, please explain:
10. Were monitoring wells properly constructed and located? ❑ Yes ❑No ❑N/A
If no,please explain:
11. Are the monitoring well coordinates correct in BIMS? ❑ Yes ®No ❑N/A
If no, please complete the following(expand table if necessary):
Monitoring Well ID Latitude Longitude
M W-1 36.067493079 -79.942304840
MW-2 36.067701405 -79.943185398
M W-5 36.067611685 -79.944824218
MW-6 36.066784988 -79.942560359
MW-7 36.068273647 -79.945564201
MW-8 36.069339702 -79.946278177
Trimble GeoXH Receiver NAD 83, State Plane Projection Differentially Corrected, 5/28/14
12. Has a review of all self-monitoring data been conducted(e.g.,NDMR,NDAR,GW)? ® Yes or❑ No
Please summarize any findings resulting from this review: VOC analyses has been conducted at required
frequency,however WSRO does not have copies of this data. Please verify whether Central Office has this data;
if not,Mr. Leigh has agreed to resubmit this information.
13. Are there any permit changes needed in order to address ongoing BIMS violations? ❑ Yes or®No
If yes,please explain:
14. Check all that apply: •
❑No compliance issues ❑ Current enforcement action(s) ❑ Currently under JOC
❑Notice(s)of violation ❑ Currently under SOC ❑ Currently under moratorium
Please explain and attach any documents that may help clarify answer/comments(i.e.,NOV,NOD, etc.)
FORM: WQROSSR 02-14 Page 2 of 4

. Have all compliance dates/conditions in the existing permit been satisfied? ® Yes n No ❑ N/A
If no,please explain:
16. Are there any issues related to compliance/enforcement that should be resolved before issuing this permit?
❑ Yes ®No n N/A
If yes,please explain:
IV. REGIONAL OFFICE RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Do you foresee any problems with issuance/renewal of this permit? ❑ Yes or® No
If yes,please explain:
2. List any items that you would like APS Central Office to obtain through an additional information request:
Item Reason
Back-Up ORC Designation No Back-up ORC according to BIMS; Faron Leigh is to forward a designation
form by COB, 6/9/2014.
3. List specific permit conditions recommended to be removed from the permit when issued:
Condition Reason
Groundwater Sampling to See attached request
occur only when irrigated
4. List specific special conditions or compliance schedules recommended to be included in the permit when issued:
Condition Reason
5. Recommendation: ❑ Hold,pending receipt and review of additional information by regional office
❑ Hold,pending review of draft permit by regional office
❑ Issue upon receipt of needed additional information
® Issue
❑ Deny(Please state reas ns:
6. Signature of report preparer: pp-
Signature of APS regional supervisor: Y .
Date: 05/30/2014
FORM: WQROSSR 02-14 Page 3 of 4

V. ADDITIONAL REGIONAL STAFF REVIEW ITEMS
Faron Leigh inquired about abandoning MW-8 and replacing it with a well in a grassed area approximately 50ft to
the north. Currently, MW-8 is located in a paved area that is prone to flooding/ponding during rain events. His
concern is that surface water may be entering the well. The well head was converted to a vault sometime around
2006. Please advise Mr. Leigh.
FORM: WQROSSR 02-14 Page 4 of 4

Colonial Pipeline Company
Creating Excellence in Transportation Services
FARON D.LEIGH Telephone: [phone]
Environmental Specialist Facsimile: 336-292-6462
Thursday,May 29,2014
NCDENR/DWQ/Aquifer Protection Section
Attn: Mr. Stephen Berry,Environmental Specialist
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem,NC 27107
SUBJECT: Permit Modification Request
Permit Number: WQ0006317—Wastewater Surface Irrigation
Colonial Pipeline Company
Guilford County
Dear Mr.Berry,
Colonial Pipeline Company respectfully requests an amendment/modification to the above referenced permit. This request is
pertaining to Section I1I.3.of the permit. As currently stated,the effluent from the subject facilities shall be monitored every March,
July and November for the parameters identified in the permit. Colonial is requesting that we only monitor if we have spray irrigated
at any time during the four months prior to each monitoring event.
Thank you very much for considering this request and please contact me at 336-669-7903 or fleighAcolpipe.com if you have
questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
016, 4
Faron D.Leigh ((//
cc: Todd W.Daniel,Colonial Pipeline Company,Greensboro Area Operations Manager
411 Gallimore Dairy Road Greensboro,North Carolina 27409

WATER QUALITY REGIONAL OPERATIONS SECTION
APPLICATION REVIEW REQUEST FORM
RECEIVED
of ENR
Date: April 15, 2014 N.C.Dept.
APR 17 2014
To: WSRO-WQROS: Corey Basinger/Sherri Knight
Winston-Salem
From: David Goodrich, Water Quality Permitting Section-Non-Discharge Permitti _ Re.ionai office
I,
Telephone: [phone] Fax: [phone] E-Mail: [e-mail]
A. Permit Number: WQ006317
B. Applicant: Colonial Pipeline Company
C. Facility Name: Greensboro Junction
D. Application:
Permit Type: Wastewater Irrigation
Project Type: Renewal
E. Comments/Other Information: Please ascertain the 6 monitor well locations by GPS.
❑ I would like to accompany you on a site visit.
Attached, you will find all information submitted in support of the above-referenced application for your
review, comment, and/or action. Within 45 calendar days,please take the following actions:
® Return a completed WQROSARR Form. ® Return a completed WQROSRSR Staff Report
❑ Attach a classification rating sheet. ❑ Attach Well Construction Data Sheet.
❑ Attach Attachment B for Certification. ❑ Issue an Attachment B Certification.
When you receive this request form, please write your name and dates in the spaces below, make a copy
of this sheet, and return it to the appropriate Central Office Water Quality Permitting Section contact
person listed above.
RO-WOROS Reviewer: Date:
FORM: WQROSARR 02-14 Page 1 of 1

Central Files: APS _ SWP
4/15/2014
Permit Number WQ0006317 Permit Tracking Slip
Program Category Status Project Type
Non-discharge In review Renewal
Permit Type Version Permit Classification
Wastewater Irrigation B Individual
Primary Reviewer Permit Contact Affiliation
david.goodrich Todd W.Daniel
Associate Manager Operations
Coastal SWRuIe 411 Gallimore Dairy Rd
Greensboro NC 27409972E
Permitted Flow
7,140
Facility
Facility Name Major/Minor Region
Greensboro Junction Minor Winston-Salem
Location Address County
411 Gallimore Dairy Rd Guilford
Facility Contact Affiliation
Greensboro NC 274099726 Faron Dale Leigh
411 Gallimore Dairy Rd
Owner Greensboro NC 27409972E
Owner Name Owner Type
Colonial Pipeline Company Non-Government
Owner Affiliation
Tom J.Guzikowski
PO Box 1624
Dates/Events Alpharetta GA 30009993
Scheduled
Orig Issue App Received Draft Initiated Issuance Public Notice Issue Effective Expiration
2/10/1977 4/11/2014
Regulated Activities Requested/Received Events
Oil separation RO staff report requested
Oil terminal operation RO staff report received
Outfall
Waterbody Name Streamindex Number Current Class Subbasin

I I
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
NON-DISCHARGE SYSTEM RENEWAL
Division of Water Resources FORM: NDSR 11-13
I. PERMITTEE INFORMATION:
I. Permittee's name: Colonial Pipeline Company
2. Signature authority's name: Todd W. Daniel per 15A NCAC 02T.0106(b) Title: Operations Mamanger
3. Permittee's mailing address: 411 Gallimore Dairy Road
City: Greensboro State:NC Zip:27409-
4. Permittee's contact information: Phone number:[phone] Email Address: [e-mail]
II. FACILITY INFORMATION:
1. Facility name:Colonial Pipeline Company
2. Facility's physical address:411 Gallimore Dairy Road
City: Greensboro State:NC Zip:27409- County: Guilford
III. PERMIT INFORMATION:
1. Existing permit number: WQ0006317 and most recent issuance date: October 28,2005
2. Existing permit type: Wastewater Irrigation
3. Has the facility been constructed? ❑ Yes or❑ No
4. Demonstration of historical consideration for permit approval- 15A NCAC 02T .0120:
Has the Applicant or any parent,subsidiary or other affiliate exhibited the following?
a. Has been convicted of environmental crimes under Federal law or G.S. 143-215.6B?❑ Yes or®No
b. Has previously abandoned a wastewater treatment facility without properly closing that facility? ❑ Yes or®No
c. Has unpaid civil penalty where all appeals have been abandoned or exhausted?❑ Yes or❑No N/A
d. Is non-compliant with an existing non-discharge permit,settlement agreement or order?❑ Yes or®No
e. Has unpaid annual fees in accordance with 15A NCAC 02T.0105(e)(2)?❑ Yes or®No
Applicant's Certification per 15A NCAC 02T.0106(b):
I, 7// • 19q I7/ P / etO ,ct / 7 erA c /f�/Q.' cr r attest that this application for
(Signa Authority's name&title from ApPikation Item I.2.)
Co/Orl/9 / !-.;fir/h » Cp,,,., qn v
(Facility'ame frofn Application Item II.1.)
has been reviewed by me and is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that any discharge of wastewater
from this non-discharge system to surface waters or the land will result in an immediate enforcement action that may include civil
penalties, injunctive relief, and/or criminal prosecution. I will make no claim against the Division of Water Resources should a
condition of this permit be violated. I also understand that if all required parts of this application package are not completed and that
if all required supporting information and attachments are not included,this application package will be returned to me as incomplete.
I further certify that the Applicant or any affiliate has not been convicted of an environmental crime, has not abandoned a wastewater
facility without proper closure, does not have an outstanding civil penalty where all appeals have been exhausted or abandoned, are
compliant with any active compliance schedule,and do not have any overdue annual fees per 15.A NCAC 02T .0105(e).
NOTE - In accordance with General Statutes 143-215.6A and 143-215.6B, any person who knowingly makes any false statement,
representation, or certification in any application package shall be guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor, which may include a fine not to
exceed$10,000 as well as civil penalties up to$25,000 per violation.
Signature: 70.4 Date: Y /l /
FORM:NDSR l 1-13 Page 1 of 1

AVA
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
John E. Skvarla, III
Pat McCrory Secretary
Governor
April 15,2014
Tom J.Guzikowski—GM of Operations
Colonial Pipeline Company
PO BOX 1624
Alpharetta,GA 30009
Subject: Acknowledgement of
Application No. WQ0006317
Greensboro Junction
Wastewater Irrigation System
Guilford County
Dear Mr.Guzikowski:
The Water Quality Permitting Section acknowledges receipt of your permit application and
supporting documentation received on April 11, 2014. Your application package has been assigned the
number listed above,and the primary reviewer is David Goodrich.
Central and Winston-Salem Regional Office staff will perform a detailed review of the provided
application, and may contact you with a request for additional information. To ensure maximum
efficiency in processing permit applications, the Division of Water Resources requests your assistance in
providing a timely and complete response to any additional information requests.
Please note that processing standard review permit applications may take as long as 60 to 90 days
after receipt of a complete application. If you have any questions, please contact
David Goodrich at(919)807-6352 or [e-mail].
Sincerely
4 for Jon Ris d
D' on of Water Resources
cc: . . •
•
Todd W.Daniel,Operations Mgr.— 411 Gal more Dairy ' •, ree . 6, 274099
Permit File WQ0006317
1636 Mail Service Center,Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1636
Phone:[phone] Internet htto://eortal.nodenr.ora/weblwq
An Equal Opportunity\Affirmative Action Employer—Made in part with recycled paper

NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH
SURFACE IRRIGATION SYSTEM PERMIT
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of North Carolina as
amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
Colonial Pipeline Company
Guilford County
FOR THE
continued operation of a 7,140 gallon per day (GPD) surface irrigation treatment and disposal facility
consisting of a holding tank, an oil/water separator, an air stripping unit, a 257,000 gallon clay-lined
aerated lagoon with two 5 HP aerators, approximately 420 linear feet of three inch suction line, an 80
GPM pump station, approximately 2,511 linear feet of three inch distribution force main,2,820 linear feet
of four inch force main, 17 spray heads, 3.69 acres of spray area, and all associated pipe fittings, valves,
and appurtenances to serve Colonial Pipeline Company, with no discharge of wastes to the surface waters,
pursuant to the application received January 9, 2002, and subsequent additional information received by
the Division, and in conformity with the project plan, specifications, and other supporting data
subsequently filed and approved by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and
considered a part of this permit.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2010, shall void Permit
No. WQ0006317 issued July 15, 1997, and shall be subject to the following specified conditions and
limitations:
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
1. The surface irrigation facilities shall be effectively maintained and operated at all times so that there
is no discharge to the surface waters,nor any contamination of ground waters, which will render them
unsatisfactory for normal use. In the event that the facilities fail to perform satisfactorily, including
the creation of nuisance conditions or failure of the irrigation area to adequately assimilate the
wastewater, the Permittee shall take immediate corrective actions including those actions that may be
required by the Division of Water Quality, such as the construction of additional or replacement
wastewater treatment and disposal facilities.
2. The issuance of this permit shall not relieve the Permittee of the responsibility for damages to surface
or groundwaters resulting from the operation of this facility.
3. The residuals generated from these treatment facilities must be disposed in accordance with General
Statute 143-215.1 and in a manner approved by the Division.
4. Diversion or bypassing of the untreated wastewater from the treatment facilities is prohibited.
1

5. The following buffers shall be maintained:
a) 400 feet between wetted area and any residence or places of public assembly under separate
ownership,
b) 150 feet between wetted area and property lines,
c) 100 feet between wetted area and wells,
d) 100 feet between wetted area and drainage ways or surface water bodies,
e) 50 feet between wetted area and public right of ways,
f) 100 feet between treatment/storage units and any wells,and
g) 50 feet between treatment units and property lines.
Some of the buffers specified above may not have been included in previous permits for this waste
treatment and disposal system. These buffers are not intended to prohibit or prevent modifications,
which are required by the Division, to improve performance of the existing treatment facility. These
buffers do, however, apply to modifications of the treatment and disposal facilities that are for the
purpose of increasing the flow that is tributary to the facility. These buffers do apply to any
expansion or modification of the irrigation areas and apply in instances in which the sale of property
would cause any of the buffers now complied with, for the treatment and disposal facilities, to be
violated. The applicant is advised that any modifications to the existing facilities will require a permit
modification.
II. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS
1. The facilities shall be properly maintained and operated at all times.
2. Upon classification of the wastewater treatment and irrigation facilities by the Water Pollution
Control System Operators Certification Commission (WPCSOCC), the Permittee shall designate and
employ a certified operator to be in responsible charge (ORC)and one or more certified operator(s)to
be back-up ORC(s) of the facilities in accordance with 15A NCAC 8G .0201. The ORC shall visit
the facilities in accordance with 15A NCAC 8G .0204 or as specified in this permit and shall comply
with all other conditions specified in these rules.
3. A suitable year round vegetative cover shall be maintained.
4. Irrigation shall not be performed during inclement weather or when the ground is in a condition that
will cause runoff.
5. Adequate measures shall be taken to prevent wastewater runoff from the irrigation field.
6. The facilities shall be effectively maintained and operated as a non-discharge system to prevent the
discharge of any wastewater resulting from the operation of this facility.
7. The application rate shall not exceed a cumulative loading of 33.75 inches over any twelve (12)
month period at an instantaneous application rate not to exceed 0.15 inches per hour.
8. No type of wastewater other than that from Colonial Pipeline Company shall be irrigated onto the
irrigation area.
9. No traffic or equipment shall be allowed on the disposal area except while installation occurs or while
normal maintenance is being performed.
10. Public access to the land application sites shall be controlled during active site use. Such controls
may include the posting of signs showing the activities being conducted at each site.
2

11. A protective vegetative cover shall be established and maintained on all earthen basin embankments
(outside toe of embankment to maximum pumping elevation),berms, pipe runs, erosion control areas,
and surface water diversions. Trees, shrubs, and other woody vegetation shall not be allowed to grow
on the earthen basin dikes or embankments. Earthen basin embankment areas shall be kept mowed or
otherwise controlled and accessible.
12. The soil in the spray areas shall be maintained above a pH of 6.5.
III. MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
1. Any monitoring (including groundwater, surface water, soil or plant tissue analyses) deemed
necessary by the Division to insure surface and ground water protection will be established and an
acceptable sampling reporting schedule shall be followed.
2. Influent flow shall be continuously monitored and daily average flow values shall be reported on
Form NDMR. Flow may be estimated from water use records provided water use is metered. Daily
average values shall be calculated by dividing monthly flow volume by the number of days in the
month.
3. The effluent from the subject facilities shall be monitored by the Permittee at the point prior to
irrigation every March,July, and November for the following parameters:
NII3 as N NO2-NO3 Total Coliform
BOD5 TKN Total Phosphorous
TSS Sodium Magnesium
PH Calcium Sodium Adsorption Ratio by Calculation
Oil and Grease Chloride Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)
Volatile Organic Compounds(VOC)
4. The Permittee tracking the amount of wastewater disposed shall maintain adequate records. These
records shall include,but are not necessarily limited to,the following information:
a. Date of irrigation,
b. Volume of wastewater irrigated,
c. Field irrigated,
d. Length of time field is irrigated,
e. Continuous weekly, monthly, and year-to-date hydraulic (inches/acre) loadings for each field,
f. Weather conditions, and
g. Maintenance of cover crops.
5. Three (3) copies of all monitoring data [as specified in Conditions III(2) and III(3)] on Form NDMR-
1 and three (3) copies of all operation and disposal records [as specified in Condition III(4)] on Form
NDAR-1 shall be submitted on or before the last day of the following month. All information shall
be submitted to the following address:
Division of Water Quality
Information Processing Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1617
6. An annual representative soils analysis (Standard Soil Fertility Analysis) shall be conducted on each
irrigation field and the results maintained on file by the Permittee for a minimum of five years. The
Standard Soil Fertility Analysis shall include, but is not necessarily limited to, the following
parameters:
3

Acidity Manganese Potassium
Calcium Percent Humic Matter Sodium
Copper PH Zinc
Magnesium Base Saturation(by calculation) Phosphorus
Cation Exchange Capacity Exchangeable Sodium Percentage
7. Noncompliance Notification:
The Permittee shall report by telephone to the Winston-Salem Regional Office, telephone number
[phone], as soon as possible, but in no case more than 24 hours or on the next working day
following the occurrence or first knowledge of the occurrence of any of the following:
a. Any occurrence at the wastewater treatment facility which results in the treatment of significant
amounts of wastes which are abnormal in quantity or characteristic, such as the dumping of the
contents of a sludge digester; the known passage of a slug of hazardous substance through the
facility; or any other unusual circumstances.
b. Any process unit failure, due to known or unknown reasons, that render the facility incapable of
adequate wastewater treatment such as mechanical or electrical failures of pumps, aerators,
compressors,etc.
c. Any failure of a pumping station, sewer line, or treatment facility resulting in a by-pass directly to
receiving waters without treatment of all or any portion of the influent to such station or facility.
d. Any time that self-monitoring information indicates that the facility has gone out of compliance
with its permit limitations.
Occurrences outside normal business hours may also be reported to the Division's Emergency
Response personnel at telephone number [phone], [phone], or [phone].
Persons reporting such occurrences by telephone shall also file a written report in letter form within
five (5) days following first knowledge of the occurrence. This report must outline the actions taken
or proposed to be taken to ensure that the problem does not recur.
IV. GROUNDWATER REQUIREMENTS
1. Sampling Requirements:
a. Groundwater monitoring wells MW-1B, MW-2, MW-5A, MW-6, MW-7, and MW-8 shall be
sampled every March, July, and November for the following parameters:
Total Dissolved Solids(TDS) Water Level
pH Nitrate Nitrogen(NO3-N)
Total Ammonia Nitrogen(NH3-N) Chloride
Volatile Organic Compounds
Water levels in the groundwater monitoring wells shall be measured prior to sampling the
groundwater for the remaining parameters. The depth to water in each well shall be measured
from the surveyed point on the top of the casing, which shall be surveyed relative to a common
datum.
4

b. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) shall be analyzed using one of the following methods:
i. Standard Method 6230D (PQL at 0.5 ug/L or less),
ii. Standard Method 6210 (PQL at 0.5 ug/L or less),
iii. EPA Method 8021 (Low Concentration,PQL at 0.5 ug/L or less),
iv. EPA Method 8260 (Low Concentration,PQL at 0.5 ug/L or less), or
v. Another method with prior approval by the Division.
Any of the referenced methods used for VOCs shall, at a minimum, include all of the constituents
listed in Table VIII of Standard Methods 6230D. The method used shall provide a PQL at 0.5
ug/L or less, which shall be supported by laboratory proficiency studies as required by the
Division's Laboratory Certification Unit. Any constituents detected above the MDL, but below
the PQL of 0.5 ug/L, shall be qualified(i.e.,estimated)and reported.
c. Any laboratory selected to analyze parameters shall be Division-certified for those parameters
required.
2. Reporting/Documentation Requirements:
a. The results of the sampling and analysis shall be received on the most-recent version of
"Groundwater Quality Monitoring: Compliance Report Form" (i.e., GW-59 Form) with copies of
the laboratory analyses attached by the Division's Aquifer Protection Section on or before the last
working day of the month following the sampling month.
b. All reports, maps, and other documents required in the "Groundwater Requirements" section of
this permit shall be mailed to the following address:
NCDENR-DWQ
Information Processing Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,NC 27699-1617
Updated blank reporting and other forms may be downloaded from the web site for the Division's
Aquifer Protection Section at http://gw.ehnr.state.ne.us/or requested from the address listed
above.
3. Vertical Separation Requirements:
a. Waste application activities shall not occur when the vertical separation between depth of
• application and the water table is at less than three (3) feet. Verification of the water table
elevation can be achieved by taking water level readings in the monitor wells near the site.
4. Applicable Boundary Requirements:
a. The COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY for the disposal system is specified by regulations in 15A
NCAC 2L, Groundwater Classifications and Standards. The Compliance Boundary for the
disposal system individually permitted prior to December 31, 1983 is established at either 500
feet from the waste disposal area, or at the property boundary, whichever is closer to the waste
disposal area. An exceedance of Groundwater Quality Standards at or beyond the Compliance
Boundary is subject to immediate remediation action according to 15A NCAC 2L .0106(d)(2).
5

b. The REVIEW BOUNDARY is established around the disposal systems midway between the
Compliance Boundary and the perimeter of the waste disposal area. Any exceedance of standards
at the Review Boundary shall require action in accordance with 15A NCAC 2L .0106(d)(1).
5. Other Requirements:
a. Any additional groundwater quality monitoring, as deemed necessary by the Division, shall be
provided.
V. INSPECTIONS
1. Adequate inspection, maintenance, and cleaning shall be provided by the Permittee to insure proper
operation of the subject facilities.
2. The Permittee or his designee shall inspect the wastewater treatment and disposal facilities to prevent
malfunctions and deterioration, operator errors and discharges which may cause or lead to the release
of wastes to the environment, a threat to human health, or a nuisance. The Permittee shall keep an
inspection log or summary including at least the date and time of inspection, observations made, and
any maintenance, repairs, or corrective actions taken by the Permittee. This log of inspections shall
be maintained by the Permittee for a period of three years from the date of the inspection and shall be
made available upon request to the Division or other permitting authority.
3. Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division may, upon presentation of
credentials, enter and inspect any property, premises or place on or related to the disposal site or
facility at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining compliance with this permit; may
inspect or copy any records that must be maintained under the terms and conditions of this permit,
and may obtain samples of groundwater, surface water, or leachate.
VI. GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. Within sixty (60) days of permit issuance, a Lagoon/Spray Field Closure Plan shall be submitted by
the applicant to the Division of Water Quality detailing the manner in which the abandoned lagoon
and spray fields shall be properly closed. See the attached memorandum of August 18, 2003
pertaining to Guidelines for the Closure of Treatment Ponds and Lagoons.
2. This permit shall become voidable unless the facilities are constructed in accordance with the
conditions of this permit, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting data.
3. This permit is effective only with respect to the nature and volume of wastes described in the
application and other supporting data.
4. This permit is not transferable. In the event there is a desire for the facilities to change ownership, or
there is a name change of the Permittee, a formal permit request must be submitted to the Division
accompanied by an application fee, documentation from the parties involved, and other supporting
materials as may be appropriate. The approval of this request will be considered on its merits and
may or may not be approved.
5. Failure to abide by the conditions and limitations contained in this permit may subject the Permittee
to an enforcement action by the Division in accordance with North Carolina General Statute 143-
215.6A to 143-215.6C.
6

6. The issuance of this permit does not exempt the Permittee from complying with any and all statutes,
rules, regulations, or ordinances which may be imposed by other government agencies (local, state,
and federal)which have jurisdiction, including but not limited to applicable river buffer rules in 15A
NCAC 2B .0200, erosion and sedimentation control requirements in 15A NCAC Chapter 4 and under
the Division's General Permit NCG010000, and any requirements pertaining to wetlands under 15A
NCAC 2B .0200 and 2H .0500.
7. The Permittee shall retain a set of approved plans and specifications for the life of the project.
8. The Permittee must pay the annual administering and compliance fee within thirty (30) days after
being billed by the Division. Failure to pay the fee accordingly may cause the Division to initiate
action to revoke this permit as specified by 15A NCAC 2H .0205 (c)(4).
9. The Permittee, at least six (6) months prior to the expiration of this permit, shall request its
extension. Upon receipt of the request, the Commission will review the adequacy of the
facilities described therein, and if warranted, will extend the permit for such period of time
and under such conditions and limitations as it may deem appropriate.
Permit issued this the 28th day of October, 2005.
NORTH C WVONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
i
..(.Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Permit Number WQ0006317
7

t4410111(' (,"-.-.—.,4ll_-,_j-,-_'_7/,;a7_1__
/ .r 7 . Friendship Ch J , ' /' /, '' f V
r, f,;Et S9GF GH .,tr' .l
,e ; ,I-.� f,j. • - ro1 l;r _Em /, - , .i ,\_ 9.-___-J Rt,'Pi",-iJ -- <.
JJ
388 \i 70h� '. :; .. • F Rdship _',� f� a3c „� i ` %' - �\\
h' / �l1 (Q • ;
--.J I ads)_ �= �� ri �(( \3e90 ram\\,,,' / I
; // >> lam} %' j, i �o �J Doz \
f 1 • _ earn .���y ° , „ •.-
°,Th\/ ��,���� -J J ,' ���� "---- V-- r �/l A �� IT ! \� • 7. F /
- \,/%,-t_
so., ---"----. Al ,.. \;,,--'-2, ' L"--.\\,NNO
1 J
' ' i—' _ ,l'-_-' .1-2-4-Z'. �� . Gasoline••• \• i21j�
\ .^I / 11 r I.`\ - �-'1\r ` _ ,\ :=Z� f�J /,'y `..apt„,--1-----„,,• ;'4��••�j'
9/7 ��
•
i .��`'- .es/ r� 'IIt
../� 0' �•. ,��\ '_ %�! — `_ ) /:3ml
s ,�,. ��o \ �, \• `,I J,ir \, 's i , !L((//��•S ��\�i�.�_I \ �_1_ -- �//i\' `•• \r
/ _ . T --
I (/' /ice v, --J i .- / -'�- ,' •.• .�O i1 \ v.�� 6°f;=y' ,, 0-
0
/ ..
.
9d2 � � � A BM J\ i is / \ , J c '
\ 1 �� / ir'% _ j:/,• , / J • � 1 i -� .-- gi3ue \ ' •'--L-ti 1 _ill,
\-) '',//2 \ ''S/0'-'t-j -'-- : • i ' te?' I //-(‘'s ?--(
Jam-`1: ! ``''�' I \' /J ' S l jf� v'\,j/ l/_� (( .In ----a
11 _� L , L. -L`r—v r�
i' ��-•J \ \ I - �".jf"' /� \ ram- \`; '��~ 1 \\\%
" =�_�� �i °o A l • y ° r lr : 1 ,E , '
•� • c �'� ,, k ! ' <v
ce. - eel/ - r{ i
---'-C-1..) \\\‘\..-',,,,.._.,--,--' ' ' 1 i I Q5/ , -7 (( i ):i ._ \ f).?",". s---, c .----___: .7--% -'- \\ bo-J,/,---"-i "--t------/e?c,.\ ‘ ',(,
✓� ���� i 857 ) r--'_ --r '�,3�J�,! //-c���I '(,/°yam � i , o- .V �. A\ �f - )��
q r�1 •
'•)' r �.�J (y .•Cedf f�"
/ ; �/> -- ->-, f-' C n • n<''' • :,--,---
__/--,) FIGURE 1
'� ' '' J (< L'4',_ % L COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANY
-'�,/ GREENSBORO TERMINAL
_,-t O v •`___,1 c� • �' 11c--\j( / ( �- SPRAY IRRIGATION SYSTEM
``' • /` GUILFORD COUNTY
Cam\
>-,
� �� �,,)\ )/�� 1 - � I �JWQ0006317
%nc` "�\ r/�, �� I�!--!NTP�(-i- ��'/„)'
it /../„ CITF. i.nC ATinN MAP

_ , r 2 I 3 I 4 1 5 1 • . , ; ...
_
-0— •5.. ..• ::, -• *,..i., ,,, ,/,'" ....1* fe , ,
... .
•1/4 le '1/4 le .1, JP,' % ;••e.
- et-,••,.. •-. • • - ..,,-.‘ c_1- - l''' p
•
"- - . ---------
• _,......- ., :'--
- ,,-,L7irs ,..4
r.„--; Ili' LI, _____,--
•7-„-,%, '7•N (;;;• / •'•' , V.:).
. \
-i 7-- -----7---? • 11rr• - . )„
••1:,I ‘ --,-;--f. ,--., .., ---
▪ r:, , -
,../
i '!Le) 'we •./ • .,.• Ilk 1. '11' '''
•S' ...-- 'III,' , .: .„) ,
I,.. „‘„7 7:„:,,_,.-=,_,_L___,,..2".„'•_-!'.-.,i__-_:._-__. ___-e e„-e=I oLe...,..=- —.--•'.' .1.,;;,r,....r. ....'`:" 'Sz 5 ,ik."4 I , „,, : ,.,,
I•''-- - ,\ ,-.::4-yir+,-,• ...1-'--‘
,-...-,.• „fp_ A : ,
•• 'ere ti/: '41 .,-'
, ,--.--, c7:---.7", : ;-''.- '. ':-. i 4 11-4,k .4--- 1--"- ' f-'7 ' ,.•
1., ,..,..t.),..„„r..,,,,...4....,/ r_ • :-..-.--:1-71.:,: , ' = . • ',/ ip._•;,,,f;,!:, r •-•.• -:', t.•., A,' I ,.• ,.
• ‘ ..z.L.A,......• ...•.' 1 .:.--• .:!,'\•74 ; : - '''-:(' .. '' s --' •I ‘
* i. .' ..,1,4... .,-..1 00Cf ti ,\..,.i. •( ,;,, WO
I • i ' ''''‘', •:—.., _'..-rr".1 „_74,,,,v,L4 7; \ ,---- - -;•,
I • ^ ..P-",) ;; -1--s r-= \
;n) .,., ;-•...- i, --,1:,, — ,6 1 - ', ,:'..7,, A-.„:4-_, --'• , ,s____, , ,....- '
....••;,_„" -- - - '''- ' ••N ‘...Atte: \ */' /I \ ' ••• %. ...• '
4 1 ,-..1 <
e".--,.. .-•-•• ----. " '-lk...Z.?.)";:, •,•
'a ‘• 14'`..-=
' il :i )-;,-/ .,. '--• •\, . —_ % .___2 . -
+ts,.. $ , , ® %
_\,.,(^•.. ) '— ‘.
0 i 0 ,,... ( -.) (.7. -.' li.,.
,1 ;,, il 4:1144,...,i/ ,•,':=. '• 7/----,0:--- ,t. .::- ,,, _•
--.
)1" •.:;,--=-.--- .=--=RI', • ,I '''LA!,-7,/- ? ; ' , ! :,.-,,• \., 's k‘ • , f Nz,-s--,--.7.-'--, \ .____ . Cir. ' -----'
I
'''.."\ '- - ....,,It ,• 1
l.t...,'
.., , ••• I';."--"•': ,.. 'A/1 •: • \ 1 '\% ,S'''s'.I Ye ) ..-
ii•,•ii, 0 _ . -ei • t ( , ''. ,'. 'l'
• ' 0 \,:::) II ---, '''' -. -.,,, \\'•---,-
,,,,,,"
t ----0-q—• N
CS))(0 1 'I II Y'',•• '. •';',... t C''Vj;,.''':",..'• ‘,. ''''' ''';,..4 ' " X S - - •. .• S\ ‘,. •,...
,- _.
. „,-„, „.. , „ .. . ‘,...._... .._.. ,, . ',,,,,„yit,l, ,.. , . i, ,.....--- __.) \ •-,----'--1-'',, \ - , 2. , ,-,,,-
\ --- ',
....,,,,, ---, ,----- \ -----''
'1/4 -. , •1•,_ 1:!'' '',',,k,'- - )7•"--':. i". ) \
,—.,..: '-7--.=--- 7 • ,_4_ , ; I' ,,11 .,,..- : ! . , /,j ,....i.---,---=-;_.--=:-.•:,\ . .,-,.., . - • . \ ,!:: ) \,
' . \ ".'"“"' '.'il;//' I II I..",-, , :- ,, 4, . -.•-.4. - .• ...-- - . : ::.
J 0...,,,. • •/::' ,
e,-'
...,// , ' Are
,, C ..'' I 'W.,117.' ,?'l',..*,&:-----• r: ' ,1-
- •
".•-..,---'" ,'•••
- :. ' ,ti W:2 ‘, - ----. *°I,:,16:••'-'7,:::::, ..-=;..4.,_,*-->"'""-r- ‘7_.: ,,:'. .,\*. s e / •' • 11 tie g s ri W I P.... s / (-1 4". .x .-----_--%
..._..,------.1:-...• .
\ 1
. i .
,,--- —— ,
W-7
\ rt -,? <..c_..--:'- ,)?:, 1,-_, ', \ '\ • ( . --
• _ — -...,=-•:—---
. .
`...,. -,--;.. • ‘-.--1
...,....---....t,
• -- t „ \ _,.,7/77,r, '7
..,...........,,,,, _ ;,
;...: I.11
••••••••••••
,,,,,, , ..1.,:-,.."" ,• 1
'1 1••WIC ft•L owl rewi emeawet orie••as ".•
- ••••••”ewe __
--
.:, --
AI
FIGURE 2
, COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANY.. GREENSBORO TERMINAL.e.'' M
SPRAY IRRIGATION SYSTEM
GUILFORD COUNTY
W00006317
SITE DETAIL MAP

Berry, Stephen
From: Leigh, Faron D <FLeigh colpipe.com>
Sent: 2:22 PM
To: Berry, Stephen
Subject: Spray Irrigation and Land Application Progress
Attachments: MW-2.JPG; MW-7.JPG; MW-5.JPG; Sketch Showing_Low_Point_Drains.pdf;
Lagoon_Inspection_Log.pdf; CPC_Lagoon_Sludge_Thicknesses.doc
Hi Stephen!
Hope you're doing well. I just wanted to send a quick update on our progress addressing the issues identified during our
recent inspections. Apex Environmental and Eastern Solutions came out last week and performed the down-hole video work
to assess our monitoring wells. They also repaired the seals that needed attention and made new well tags. I have included a
few pictures of some of the wells. If would like, I could send you pictures of all 9 wells and/or a copy of the videos when I
receive them. I have also attached a sketch identifying the low-point drains for the spray irrigation lines and attached our new
weekly inspection log with the inspection of the berm conditions added. We have shot elevations on the lagoon berms and
our freeboard indicator. We plan to adjust the freeboard indicator to more accurately reflect the true elevations. I have also
attached a "not-to-scale" drawing showing sludge levels at nine different points in the lagoon.Thanks again for your help
Stephen and please let me know if you need anything else at this time or if you would like "hard" copies of any of this
information.
Faron
Faron D. Leigh
Environmental Specialist
Southeast District
FLeighCa)colpipe.com
[phone]
This message contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended solely for the use of the addressee(s) named above.
Any disclosure,distribution, copying or use of the information by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in
error, please advise the sender by immediate reply and delete the original message. Thank you.
1

r '- --•: 'I 16
NON POTABLE
WATr" ,
z,
•
Y LCY -).
{ham ,
i
r
t
J
•
a f
J� / i ys
4l
4 >'s" r, Yam, .. - - Y t'94 ,°, ` fie' !' '` ._.r' " :,
.'P....t....-.:..,_,L'.,'...,..-.,.'3i,'..,Z.--•'•-.-;•"'+'
a --
3' . -. - ..G.; F y 4 , ' .i ,�, fir,..-- _ . )-
!° +6$� k a .
.4 �t -,
'$�`"j ` • r a' " p• s`4$ " " Y V r ' , Xr Aw f `23}41 *KV /1 T. _
•
.+ • rfr .0. • `� 66T/ ' , - y4 y . 2 '14 , L t- , e` 11 - 1i • - , 1q -* . 's; , ',re, ': i ,fir ° _y` ,ro ' N w- '� a' : �' i-, tt , .a 1t' l, ` ; , , L q rs:t ' tF, a «�, T .{{ 4' ''
•
•
..:., _.:14,„
p ,;x•
4. f-A .[% y�1 ; �i- , �4" 4� Ar . � '. - ew„ .! s,. . .- _

NOTICE
PION-POTABLE
WATER
f F
o
N. *PI"_# 3 Y
v
0"`s e
s.
... 0 a - e
is - - � - "�,j 41t
t
I.
i v
4 1I
S
, i
l
a

NOTICE
NON•POTABLI
WATER
4
�n
,.s .
a.
wi*
4
_ �_
�.
4 ,
•
. , -11.. -
t
z •
a
T :
4
P ' hi quo \
iliima '
•
t
e

1.1 40.
-ow&

..s
r
w
S
O
c.
co
n)
0
m
3
Co
CL
o
D g
co
not
tea 3
CD
a
(,)
C) to
rir
chi 3
0
o '•
1
C1c
`o'
Z
I
-a
5
to
Ro
0.
m
0
lA
.Z7
CD
3
n)
1
0
r
m
co
0
0
O
o'

Colonial Pipeline Company—Greensboro-Lagoon showing sludge thicknesses
3" 4" 3"
6" 4" 6"
5" 5„ 8"

6-- -.....
•.•
//,';
((
i\
, r
,. __:),...,,00, ,0 7 - ....
Q
(i ..:
S.
----,.,
. ._
0
s. -,,, ,.z, .L., i •• • „
,
..._........-
f.siipsi .„,.p ,l,
• . . ... .
) ..,
(0
.‹, 0 okr
-VC to4;..:00,0 pc::;•
0 ._ • T- . \\ '
•-•--1-4 j I. - \ \ 7',
-••••-•••-•-...-„__, C.)
-14r.--1 7 ? • • - _.
i, \
i , 1
.i ...J l
i
- r- ---Th,
i_J • I (
e - . .. .
• ,. .
---------
___.,"L—..,, .,-. -- '...1;...—.....-'s -.--......-.-------
.41111///,--
L
‘ ...--- "....7.7.---—_ \
s. ,..,
-, ri ------ '- 'N• ,
0 '
i i 4 -1...4- ___.--
•i, ,
l'7
,
,. ...--

T vi,„16
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Programs
Pat McCrory Thomas A. Reeder John E. Skvarla, Ill
Governor Director Secretary
September 30, 2013
Mr. Faron Dale Leigh
Colonial Pipeline Company
411 Gallimore Dairy Road
Greensboro, NC 27409
Subject: Compliance Inspection/ Notice of Deficiency (NOD-2013-PC-0385)
Colonial Pipeline Company
Residuals Land Application Program (D), Wastewater Surface Irrigation
Permit Nos. WQ0005809 &WQ0006317
Guilford County
Dear Mr. Leigh:
On September 25, 2013, you accompanied Stephen Berry of the Division of Water
Resources (DWR) while he performed a compliance evaluation inspection of the subject
residuals land application program and wastewater spray irrigation system. Prior to the
facility inspection, Mr. Berry reviewed Colonial Pipeline's 2013 Non-Discharge
Monitoring and Application Reports.
Colonial Pipeline was found to be deficient in the following North Carolina
Administrative Code requirements:
1) 15A NCAC 02C .0112 (a) states, "Every well shall be maintained by the owner
in a condition whereby it will conserve and protect the groundwater resources, and
whereby it will not be a source or channel of contamination or pollution to the water
supply or any aquifer...", and 15A NCAC 02C .0108 (I) All non-water supply wells shall
be ...set in concrete, and other measures sufficient to protect the well from damage by
normal site activities.
WATER QUALITY SECTION
585 Waughtown Street,Winston-Salem,North Carolina 27107
Phone:[phone] FAX:[phone]\Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
Internet:www.ncwater.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

Colonial Pipeline:WQ0005809&WQ0006317
September 30,2013
Page 2 of 3
Action Required: To prevent contamination or entry of surface water down the well,
please emplace watertight caps or watertight plugs on well casing and repair
wellheads including the surface concrete seal.
2) 15A NCAC 02C .0108 (k) All non-water supply wells, including temporary wells,
shall be secured with a locking well cap to ensure against unauthorized access and use.
Action Required: Please provide a written statement within 30 days of receipt of this
Notice explaining your intentions for meeting this requirement.
3) 15A NCAC 02C .0108 (o) Each non-water supply well shall have permanently
affixed an identification plate. The identification plate shall be constructed of a durable,
waterproof, rustproof metal or other material approved by the Department as
equivalent and shall contain the following information:
(1) well contractor name and certification number;
(2) date well completed;
(3) total depth of well;
(4) a warning that the well is not for water supply and that the groundwater may
contain hazardous materials;
(5) depth(s) to the top(s) and bottom(s) of the screen(s); and
(6) the well identification number or name assigned by the well owner.
Action Required: Please provide a written statement within 30 days of receipt of this
Notice outlining your intentions for meeting this requirement.
•
In addition to the above deficiencies, please note the following items of concern:
1) At the time of inspection, pH meter calibration documentation could not be
located. Please provide documentation that illustrates your field meter is
properly calibrated.
2) Please provide a schematic that illustrates low point drains in and around
irrigation fields.
3) Please refurbish wastewater lagoon freeboard marker; marker may need to be
re-sited to determine proper designed freeboard. Please note that a design
criterion for new and expanding facilities is a minimum of two feet of freeboard.
It is strongly recommended that your lagoon maintain a minimum of two feet of
freeboard.
4) Sludge level in wastewater lagoon is unknown. In preparation for permit
renewal, please determine level of settled solids in lagoon.
5) Please discontinue reporting lagoon effluent parameters on GW-59 forms. As
you are aware, these forms are used for groundwater monitoring; please
continue to report this data on your monthly non-discharge application report
form (i.e. NDAR).

Colonial Pipeline:WQ0005809&WQ0006317
September 30,2013
Page 3 of 3
Thank you in advance for your attention to these matters. If you or your staff have any
questions concerning this letter, you may contact Stephen Berry at [phone] or
by email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Sherri V. Knight, P.E.
Asst. Regional Supervisor, Water Quality Section
cc:

SeeRi404in in)C20005boci iiit
R,rA.1.0-,-1 ivlf
Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: WO0006317 Effective: 10/28/05 Expiration: 09/30/14 Owner: Colonial Pipeline Company
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Greensboro Junction
County: Guilford 411 Gallimore Dairy Rd V
Region: Winston-Salem
Greensboro NC 274099726
Contact Person: Faron Dale Leigh Title: Environmental Tech Phone: [phone]...)
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC: Faron Dale Leigh Certification: 14891 Phone: [phone] Ct/)
Secondary ORC(s):
On-Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: C(ILS I i,. Entry Time: i DA Exit Time: i 2;.4 Se
Primary Inspector: Stephen Berry Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Wastewater Irrigation
Facility Status: Compliant 0 Not Compliant
Question Areas:
■Treatment Flow ■Treatment Flow ■Miscellaneous Questions III Treatment Flow
Measurement-Effluent Measurement-Influent Measurement-Water Use
Records
▪Treatment .Treatment Filters .Record Keeping .Treatment Lagoons
•End Use-Irrigation ■Treatment Influent Pump El Treatment Disinfection ■Treatment Flow
Station Measurement
•Storage Standby Power II Wells
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: WQ0006317 Owner-Facility: Colonial Pipeline Company
Inspection Date: Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
Page: 2

Permit: WQ0006317 Owner-Facility: Colonial Pipeline Company
Inspection Date: Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Treatment Yes No NA NE
Are Treatment facilities consistent with those outlined in the current permit? !rl ❑ 0 0
Do all treatment units appear to be operational?(if no, note below.) E❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Treatment Influent Pump Station Yes No NA NE
Is the pump station free of bypass lines or structures? V ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the general housekeeping acceptable? 0 0 0
Are all pumps present? Li❑ 0 0
Are all pumps operable? +( 0 0 0
Are floats/controls operable? 0 0 0 1211
Are audio and visual alarms available? 0 0 0 ! '
Are audio and visual alarms operational? 0 0 0 D
#Are SCADA/Telemetry alarms required? ❑ ❑ d ❑
Are SCADA/Telemetry available? Dodo
Are SCADA/Telemetry operational? ❑ ❑ d ❑
Comment:
Treatment Flow Measurement-Influent Yes No NA NE
Is flowmeter calibrated annually? f 12,4 /. €zrf (-A <4J i J 5 __ 0 0 d 0
Is flowmeter operating properly? ❑ ❑ 0' ❑
Does flowmeter monitor continuously? l( ❑ 0 ❑
Does flowmeter record flow? 0 0 W 0
Does flowmeter appear to monitor accurately? 0 0 d❑
Comment:
Treatment Flow Measurement-Water Use Records Yes No NA NE
Is water use metered? d ❑ Q ❑
Are the daily average values properly calculated? ❑ ❑ ❑ NJ
Comment:
Treatment Flow Measurement-Effluent Yes No NA NE
Is flowmeter calibrated annually? ❑ ❑
dio
Is flowmeter operating properly? Dodo
Does flowmeter monitor continuously? 0 0 E❑
Page: 3

Permit: WQ0006317 Owner-Facility: Colonial Pipeline Company fl A I
i
Inspection Date: Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Does flowmeter record flow? ❑ ❑ i ❑
Does flowmeter appear to monitor accurately? Dodo
Comment:
Standby Power Yes No NA NE
Is automatically activated standby power available? 0 0 0
Is generator tested weekly by interrupting primary power source? 0 0 0
Is generator operable? 0 0 0
Does generator have adequate fuel? ❑ ❑ - ❑
Comment:
Treatment Filters Yes No NA NE
Is the filter media present? 0 0 0
Is the filter media the correct size and type? 1, 0 0 0
Is the air scour operational? ! S\� ' ,` ,1 0 0 0
Is the scouring acceptable? PIA- (14)00-4 0 0 0
Is the clear well free of excessive solids? 0 0 0
Is the mud well free of excessive solids and filter media? 0 0 0
Does backwashing frequency appear adequate? 0 0 0
Comment:
Treatment Disinfection Yes No NA NE
Is the system working? 0 0 11 0
Do the fecal coliform results indicate proper disinfection? ❑ ❑ 0
Is there adequate detention time(>=30 minutes)? 0 0 II 0
Is the system properly maintained? 0 0 I 0
If gas,does the cylinder storage appear safe? ❑ ❑ I 0
Is the fan in the chlorine feed room and storage area operable? ❑ ❑ 1 0
Is the chlorinator accessible? ❑ ❑ 1 0
If tablets,are tablets present? 0 0 II 0
Are the tablets the proper size and type? 0 0 II 0
Is contact chamber free of sludge,solids,and growth? 0 0 11 0
If UV,are extra UV bulbs available? 0 0 Ii 0
Page: 4

Permit: WQ0006317 Owner-Facility: Colonial Pipeline Company
Inspection Date: Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
If UV, is the UV intensity adequate? 0010
#Is it a dual feed system? 0 0 0
Does the Stationary Source have more than 2500 lbs of Chlorine(CAS No. 7782-50-5)? ❑ ❑ 0
If yes,then is there a Risk Management Plan on site? 0 0 0
If yes,then what is the EPA twelve digit ID Number?(1000- - )
If yes,then when was the RMP last updated?
Comment:
Record Keeping Yes No NA NE
Is a copy of current permit available? 17(n ❑ n
Are monitoring reports present: NDMR? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑
NDAR? ra ❑ ❑ ❑
I
Are flow rates less than of permitted flow? 0 0 ❑ ❑
Are flow rates less than of permitted flow? +_-' ❑ ❑ ❑
Are application rates adhered to? d ❑ ❑ ❑
Is GW monitoring being conducted, if required(GW-59s submitted)? ❑ ❑
Are all samples analyzed for all required parameters? 0
Are there any 2L GW quality violations? di 0
Is GW-59A certification form completed for facility? ❑ 0
Is effluent sampled for same parameters as GW? d ❑ ❑ ❑
Do effluent concentrations exceed GW standards? ❑ d n ❑
Are annual soil reports available? do 0 0
#Are PAN records required? 0000
#Did last soil report indicate a need for lime? f`1 ❑ ❑ ❑
If so, has it been applied? ri 0 0 0
Are operational logs present? pi ❑ ❑ ❑
Are lab sheets available for review? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑
Do lab sheets support data reported on NDMR? ❑ ❑ ❑
Do lab sheets support data reported on GW-59s? ri1 n n n
Are Operational and Maintenance records present? n n n
Were Operational and Maintenance records complete? non
Page: 5

Permit: WQ0006317 Owner-Facility: Colonial Pipeline Company
Inspection Date: Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Has permittee been free of public complaints in last 12 months? CJ ❑ 0 0
Is a copy of the SOC readily available? 0 0 El 0
No treatment units bypassed since last inspection? 910 0 0
Comment:
End Use-Irrigation Yes No NA NE
Are buffers adequate? d ❑ ❑( ❑
Is the cover crop type specified in permit? ❑ ❑ CJ ❑
Is the crop cover acceptable? pf ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the site condition adequate? d ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the site free of runoff/ponding? Y I ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the acreage specified in the permit being utilized? g 0 0 0
Is the application equipment present? 13000
Is the application equipment operational? 434000
Is the disposal field free of limiting slopes? Ef 0 0 0
Is access restricted and/or signs posted during active site use? E' ❑ ❑ ❑
Are any supply wells within the CB? 0 G ❑ 0
Are any supply wells within 250' of the CB? 0 ❑ ❑ �E(
How close is the closest water supply well? 0 0 0 !J
Is municipal water available in the area? 6 ❑ ❑ ❑
#Info only: Does the permit call for monitoring wells? +=' ❑ ❑ ❑
Are GW monitoring wells located properly w/respect to RB and CB? 6 ❑0 ❑ ❑
Are GW monitoring wells properly constructed, including screened interval? 0 M 0 0
Are monitoring wells damaged? PI 0 0 0
Comment:
Page: 6

Al;
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Resources
Water Quality Programs
Pat McCrory Thomas A. Reeder John E. Skvarla, Ill
Governor Director Secretary
November 15, 2013
Mr. Faron Dale Leigh
Colonial Pipeline Company
411 Gallimore Dairy Road
Greensboro, NC 27409
Subject: Clearance Letter for Notice of Deficiency (NOD-2013-PC-0385)
Colonial Pipeline Company
Residuals Land Application Program (D), Wastewater Surface Irrigation
Permit Nos. WQ0005809 & WQ0006317
Guilford County
Dear Mr. Leigh:
Thank you for the response to the Notice of Deficiency letter dated September 30,
2013 and received on October 29, 2013. Based upon the review by Stephen Berry of
the North Carolina Division of Water Resources' Winston-Salem Regional Office, it is
my understanding that the Colonial Pipeline has satisfied all requirements and has
demonstrated compliance with permit conditions and rules relating to land application
of biosolids and wastewater irrigation.
If you or your staff have any questions concerning land application activities and
compliance, please do not hesitate to contact Stephen Berry at [phone] or by
email at [e-mail].
Sincerely,
'f t
Sherri V. Knight, P.E.
Asst. Regional Supervisor
cc: Guilford County Health Department
APS Central Office
WATER QUALITY REGIONAL OPERATIONS
585 Waughtown Street,Winston-Salem,North Carolina 27107
Phone:[phone] FAX:[phone]\Customer Service 1-877-623-6748
Internet:www.ncwater.org
An Equal Opportunity 1 Affirmative Action Employer

.swo
ANNUAL METER INSPECTION/CALIBRATION REQUEST
RESEARCH &ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
106 SHORT STREET
KERNERSVILLE N.C.27284
336-996-2841
PLEASE COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 8 PRIOR TO INSPECTION
1. DATE C7 -f
2. FACILITY NAME (.o if o?.'oi dam. %i;,ir- (1 - FACILITY#
3. SHIPPING ADDRESS 4 ��t/i m or?,
,v ,2 ,ge 9
4; CONTACT PERSON `r1 n1 n ,!t: s4 PHONE,9 9�^
5. METER MAKE 5/' ' s'� p i r '- MODEL# 'ae7 3
6. METER SERIAL# of ea,'$
7. DESCRIBE,�� PROBLEMS OR MODIFICATIONS SINCE LAST INSPECTION
//
/ .?. ( 47 drir-4 ,yes
8. BUFFER SOLUTION REQUESTED 4.00 7.00 10.00
INSPECTION/CALIBRATION RESULTS
DATE
PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED PRIOR TO INSPECTION "
FROBLEMS CORRECTED PRIOR TO INSPECTION r'"'�
REPAIRS MADE PRIOR TO INSPECTION
CALIBRATION RESULT 4.00 'i 0 3 0 •' `
7.00 -,o -414,z
7.00 10,4
7.00 -7-0 © zA-8'
10.00 9,9y © -"I'4
INSPECTOR SHEILA Y.WARD SIGNATURE 5U."u
TEMPERTURE CALIBRATION RESULTS
METER READING CERTIFIED READING DIFFERENCE
SN # 2069 / 96-148

ANNUAL METER INSPECTION/CALIBRATION REQUEST
RESEARCH &ANALYTICAL LABORATORIES, INC.
106 SHORT STREET
KERNERSVILLE N.C.27284
336-996-2841
PLEASE COMPLETE ITEMS 1 THROUGH 8 PRIOR TO INSPECTION
1. DATE 4,S-oil/a•
2. FACILITY NAME (-24J,71 fn�. 41.:, 6. FACILITY#
3. SHIPPING ADDRESS W/ li//mor , ,
e rY l/0?7'
4; CONTACT PERSON r0.,1 L,. '� PHONE a/VA/3
5. METER MAKE i'A� ,SEr;0441 'c MODEL# 8' r2 7J '
6. METER SERIAL# (f/l ,?.5 ?'0
7. DESC�RIBE OBLEM OR MODIFICATIONS SINCE LAST INSPECTION
A
8. BUFFER SOLUTION REQUESTED 4.00 7.00 10.00
INSPECTION/CALIBRATION RESULTS
DATE I7-4/0
PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED PRIOR TO INSPECTION .. �
RROBLEMS CORRECTED PRIOR TO INSPECTION
REPAIRS MADE PRIOR TO INSPECTION
CALIBRATION RESULT 4.00 3.q q © I -9
7.00 '7. oz @ ;q,c�
7.00 7.0
7.00 '7•6 @ 5
10.00 /o,6 @ 19,9
INSPECTOR SHEILA Y.WARD SIGNATURE �� ,-.5".
BUFFER SOLUTIONS SHIPPED 4.00 EXPIRATION DATE
7.00 EXPIRATION DATE
10.00 EXPIRATION DATE
DATE INSPECTION/CALIBRATION COMPLETED
DATE METER RETURNED/SHIPPED TO FACILITY

'NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Beverly Eaves Perdue Coleen H. Sullins Dee Freeman
Governor Director Secretary
July 1, 2011
Faron Dale Leigh
Colonial Pipeline Company
411 Gallimore Dairy Rd
Greensboro,NC 27409-9726
SUBJECT: May 25,2011 Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Colonial Pipeline Company
Greensboro Junction
Permit No: WQ0006317
Guilford County
Dear Mr. Leigh:
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection form from the inspection conducted on May 25,
2011. The Compliance Evaluation Inspection was conducted by Derek Denard of the Winston-Salem Regional Office.
The facility was found to be in compliance with permit WQ0006317.
Review of NDMRs and NDARs from September 2007 to April 2011 found the following:
All effluent monitoring events for this review period did not have the following parameters reported on the NDMR form:
BOD5, TKN, Total Coliform, and Total Phosphorus. These parameters were noted in the attached lab data for the
November 2010 and March 2011 data. However,the attached lab report was not available in our NDMR files starting in
July 2010 back to November 2007. In addition no parameters were reported on the NDMR in July 2008. After reviewing
the GW-59s,the missing data for these months was discovered on GW-59 forms with attached lab reports. To prevent
confusion for our files and database please submit all effluent data on NDMR forms with attached lab reports,which
include the VOC data. An addition page for the NDMR can be submitted for parameters,excluding VOCs, not entered in
on the first page. The most recent additions of Form NDMR and NDMR 1.1 (with blank columns for parameters)has
been enclosed. Writeable forms can be downloaded from the following website:
http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/aps/lau/reporting
Review of GW-59s from November 2007 to March 2011 found the following:
• MW-2 had a detection of 1,2-Dichloroethane of 1.7µg/L for 11/05/08 and Naphthalene 1.5 µg/L for 11/30/07.
• MW-8 had a detection of Benzene of 0.52 µg/L and Toluene of 0.96 µg/L for 11/05/08.
Winston-Salem Regional Office
585 Waughtown Street,Winston-Salem,North Carolina 27107 One
Phone:[phone] FAX:[phone] Customer Service:1-877-623-6748 NorthCarolina
Internet:http:f/portal.ncdenr.orgNveblwq Naturally
An Equal Opportunity\Affirmative Action Employer

Mr. Leigh
July 1, 2011
Page 2 of 2
Please refer to the enclosed inspection report for additional observations and comments. If you or your staff have any
questions, please call Derek Denard at 336-771-5286.
Sincerely,
AA4),"Y.- Kiltet1
Sherri V.Knight, P.E.
Regional Aquifer Protection Supervisor
cc: Guilford County Health Department
APS Central Office-Permit File WQ0006317
Winston-Salem Regional Office
585 Waughtown Street,Winston-Salem,North Carolina 27107 One
Phone:[phone] FAX:[phone] I Customer Service:1-877-623-6748 NorthCarolina
Internet http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq Naturally
An Equal Opportunity\Affirmative Action Employer

State of North Carolina O�O� W A7 p
Department of Environment and Natural Resources G
Division of Water Quality r
Beverly Eaves Purdue, Governor
Dee Freeman, Secretary
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
NON-DISCHARGE COMPLIANCE INSPECTION REPORT
SURFACE IRRIGATION
GENERAL INFORMATION
Owner: Colonial Pipeline Company County: Guilford
Permit No.: WQ0006317 Issuance Date: October 28, 2005
Facility Name: Greensboro Junction Expiration Date: September 30, 2014
Facility Address: 411 Gallimore Dairy Rd., Greensboro, NC 27409
Mailing Address: 411 Gallimore Dairy Rd., Greensboro, NC 27409
Source Coordinates: 36.071326N 79.940825W(geographic center of tank farm)
Driving Directions: From 1-40 E toward Greensboro. Take exit 211 for Gallimore Dairy Rd. Turn right onto
Gallimore Dairy Rd.
Permit Owner: Doug Belden Telephone No.:
Permittee Contact: Faron Leigh Telephone No.: 336-669-7903
ORC Name: Faron Leigh Cert#: 14770 Telephone No.: 336-669-7903
Backup ORC: John Culbreath Cert#: 17575 Telephone No.: 704-320-7777
Email Address: fleigh( colpipe.com
Related Permits:
Reason for Inspection
® ROUTINE ❑ COMPLAINT ❑ FOLLOW-UP ❑ Other:
Inspection Summary:(additional comments may be included on attached pages)
Review of NDMRs and NDARs from September 2007 to April 2011 found the following:
All effluent monitoring events for this review period did not have the following parameters reported on the
NDMR form: BOD5, TKN, Total Coliform, and Total Phosphorus. These parameters were noted in the
attached lab data for the November 2010 and March 2011 data. However, the attached lab report was
not available in our NDMR files starting in July 2010 back to November 2007. In addition no parameters
were reported on the NDMR in July 2008. After reviewing the GW-59s,the missing data for these months
was discovered on GW-59 forms with attached lab reports. To prevent confusion for our files and
database please submit all effluent data on NDMR forms with attached lab reports, which include the
VOC data. An addition page for the NDMR can be submitted for parameters, excluding VOCs, not
entered in on the first page. The most recent additions of Form NDMR and NDMR 1.1 (with blank
columns for parameters) has been enclosed. Writeable forms can be downloaded from the following
website: http://portal.ncdenr.orq/web/wq/aps/lau/reportinq
Review of GW-59s from November 2007 to March 2011 found the following:
• MW-2 had a detection of 1,2-Dichloroethane of 1.7pg/L for 11/05/08 and Naphthalene 1.5 pg/L
for 11/30/07.
• MW-8 had a detection of Benzene of 0.52 pg/L and Toluene of 0.96 pg/L for 11/05/08.

Colonial Pipeline Company—Wastewater Surface Irrigation Permit No WO0006317
Compliance Inspection Report May 25, 2011
Facility Status: Compliant ® Not Compliant ❑
Is a follow-up inspection necessary?Yes ❑ No El
Inspector Name: Derek Denard
Secondary Inspector:
Telephone: [phone] Fax:
Date of Inspection: May 25, 2011 Entry Time: 01:00 pm Exit Time: 03:00 pm
Type
❑ Reuse(i.e., golf courses)
❑Activated Sludge Spray, low rate
❑ Recycle-Reuse
❑Activated Sludge Spray, high rate
❑ Lagoon Drip, Low Rate
®Activated Sludge Drip, low rate
❑ Infiltration System
❑ Other
Influent Pump Station Y N NA NE
All pumps present, operational ❑ ❑ Z ❑
Floats/Controls operable ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Audio &Visual Alarms Operational ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Free of bypass lines or structures ❑ ❑ ® ❑
General housekeeping good ❑ ❑ Z ❑
Back-up power available, routinely tested &fueled? ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Comments:
Treatment Barscreen Y N NA NE
Are bars spaced properly&free of excess debris? ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Are screenings disposed of properly? ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Is unit in good condition (excess corrosion)? ❑ ❑ Z ❑
Comments:
Equalization Basin Y N NA NE
Is aeration present? ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Are pumps present and operational? ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Is unit in good general condition? ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Comments:
Treatment Activated Sludge Y N NA NE
Aeration mechanism operable &accessible? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Page 2 of 6

Colonial Pipeline Company—Wastewater Surface Irrigation Permit No WO0006317
Compliance Inspection Report May 25, 2011
Aeration basin thoroughly mixed? ® ❑ El ❑
Settleometer&dissolved oxygen results acceptable? ❑ ❑ ❑
Is sludge an acceptable color? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Comments:
Residual Storage/Treatment Y N NA NE
❑ Lagoon ❑ Basin
Is aeration pattern even? ❑ ❑ ® ❑
El Septic Tank(s) Capacity (gallons):
Is sanitary T or filter present? ❑ El ® ❑
How often are residuals pumped?
Are pumping receipts available? ❑ El ® ❑
What is the receiving WWTP?
Comment:
Treatment Filter(s) Y N NA NE
Is the filter media present, correct size &type? ❑ El ® ❑
Is mud well free of excess solids and filter media? ❑ ❑ ® ❑
If sand filter, is unit subsurface? ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Is media free of ponding, algae or excess vegetation? El ❑ ® ❑
Is air scour operational and acceptable? ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Is clear well free of excess solids? El ❑ Z ❑
Does backwashing frequency appear adequate? ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Comment:
Treatment Clarifiers Y N NA NE
Weirs level, free of excessive solids &algae? El ❑ ® El
Scum removal system operational and accessible? El ❑ ® ❑
Sludge blanket at acceptable level? ❑ El Z ❑
Clarifier effluent free of excessive solids? ❑ ❑ ❑ El
Comments:
Treatment Disinfection Y N NA NE
Type: ❑Tablets ❑ Gas ❑ Liquid ❑ UV
Is the system properly maintained and working? ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Fecal coliform results indicate proper disinfection? El ❑ ® ❑
Adequate detention time (> 30 minutes)? ❑ ❑ ® El
If tablets, proper size? ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Present in Cylinder(s)? ❑ ❑ ® ❑
If gas/liquid, does cylinder/tank storage appear safe? ❑ ❑ ® ❑
If UV bulbs, are replacement bulbs on hand? ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Is contact chamber free of sludge, solids and growth? ❑ Cl ® El
Comments:
Page 3 of 6

Colonial Pipeline Company—Wastewater Surface Irrigation Permit No WO0006317
Compliance Inspection Report May 25, 2011
Flow Measurement Y N NA NE
Flowmeter location: ❑ Influent ❑ Effluent
Is flowmeter calibrated annually(design flow>10,000 gpd)? ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Is flowmeter operating properly? ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Does flowmeter operate continuously? ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Does flowmeter record flow? ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Does flowmeter appear to monitor accurately? ❑ ❑ ® ❑
If no flowmeter(design flow 1,000- <10,000 gpd), are water-use records available (water meter)?
❑ ❑ ® ❑
Are the daily average values properly calculated? ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Comments:
Treatment Y N NA NE
Are treatment facilities consistent with those outlined in permit? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Do all treatment units appear to be operational? If no, note below. ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Comments(list any action items necessary for each unit):
Effluent Storage
❑Lagoon(s): ❑Aerated or ❑ Mixed
Spill control plan on site? ❑Yes ❑No ❑NA ONE
❑Above ground tank(s): ❑Aerated or ❑ Mixed
❑ Underground tank(s): ❑ Aerated or ❑ Mixed
❑ Drying beds ❑ Concrete storage pads ❑Other:
Amount of Storage(days, months, gallons, etc.):
Comments:
Effluent Storage Lagoon(s) Y N NA NE
❑ Primary ❑ Secondary
Influent structure(s)free of obstructions? ❑ ❑ Z ❑
Banks/berms (are there signs of seepage, overtopping, down cutting or erosion)
❑ ❑ ® ❑
Vegetation (is there excessive vegetation on the lagoon bank) ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Liner(if visible, is it intact) ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Baffles/curtains(in need of repair) ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Freeboard (>2 feet from overtopping) ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Measurement at time of inspection
Staff gauge(clearly marked) ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Evidence of overflow(vegetation discolored or laying down/broken) ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Unusual color(very black, textile colors) ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Page 4 of 6

Colonial Pipeline Company—Wastewater Surface Irrigation Permit No WO0006317
Compliance Inspection Report May 25, 2011
Effluent Storage Lagoon(s) continued Y N NA NE
Foam (are antifoam agents used) ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Floating mats (sludge, plants, inorganics) ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Excessive solids buildup(from bottom) ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Aerators/mixers operational (if present) ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Effluent structure (free of obstructions, easily accessible) ❑ El ® ❑
Comments:
Pump station(s) Y N NA NE
All pumps present, operational ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Floats/Controls operable ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Audio &Visual Alarms Operational ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Free of bypass lines or structures ❑ ❑ ® ❑
General housekeeping good ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Back-up power ❑ ❑ ® ❑
Comments:
End Use-Irrigation Number of Fields: 3 Y N NA NE
Are buffers adequate? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Are cover crops the type specified in permit and in good condition? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Are there signs of runoff, ponding, or drift? ❑ ® ❑ ❑
Is the acreage specified in the permit being utilized? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the application equipment present, operational, and in good condition? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Are there any limiting slopes in disposal fields? ❑ ® ❑ ❑
Is site access restricted and/or signs posted in accordance with permit? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Are any supply wells within the CB? ❑ ® ❑ ❑
Are any supply wells within 250' of the CB? ❑ Z ❑ ❑
Spray heads calibrated this past year? ❑ ❑ ❑ El
Is permit being followed? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Comments:
Groundwater Monitoring Wells Y N NA NE
Does the permit require monitoring wells? If so, answer the following. Z ❑ ❑ ❑
Are the monitoring wells properly installed according to the permit? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Are the monitoring wells located properly w/respect to RB & CB? Z ❑ ❑ ❑
Are the wells properly identified &free of damage? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Comments:
Page 5 of 6

Colonial Pipeline Company—Wastewater Surface Irrigation Permit No WQ0006317
Compliance Inspection Report May 25, 2011
Recordkeepinq Y N NA NE
Is current permit available upon request? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Has the facility been free of public complaints for the last 12 months? ® Cl ❑ ❑
Are operational logs and maintenance records present and complete? ® ❑ El El
Effluent Monitoring:
Are monitoring reports present? ® NDMR ® NDAR Z ❑ El ❑
Are flow rates less than permitted flow? ® El ❑ El
Are application rates adhered to? ® El ❑ El
Are lab sheets available for review and support NDMR or NDAR? Z ❑ El ❑
Are all samples analyzed for the required parameters? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Are PAN records required, if so, are they present and complete? ❑ ® ❑ ❑
Is field parameter certification required? El ® El ❑
Do effluent concentrations exceed 2L GW standards? ❑ ® El ❑
Groundwater Monitoring:
Were GW-59's submitted? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Has GW-59A certification been completed for facility? ® ❑ El ❑
Are all samples analyzed for the required parameters? ® ❑ ❑ ❑
Are there any 2L GW quality violations? ❑ ® El El
Soil Analysis:
Were annual soil analysis conducted for each irrigation field? ® ❑ ❑ El
Was lime called for on the Agronomist report? ❑ El ❑ El
If required, was lime applied? ❑ ❑ El El
Copper and Zinc indices: ® <2,000 ❑2,000—3,000 ❑ >3,000
Was Sodium less than 0.5 meq/100 cm3 ? ❑ ❑ ❑
Was Exchangeable Sodium Percentage (ESP) less than 15% ? ❑ El El
Comments: A contract lab did the soils analysis on December 16, 2010. Results: CEC— 14, 10, 5.9;Zn
10.9, 10.7, 27.2(mg/kg-dry); Cu 4.39, 7.03, 8.01(mg/kg-dry);Na 0.893, 0.302, 0.429 (meg/100g-dry).
Page 6 of 6

December 16. 20t1
iaron Leigh
lonial Pipeline Comnanv
'+i► uainmore uatry tcc
Greensboro NC 2740-
i EL: [phone]
=_.X: (3361 294-3192
RE: Greensboro
near raron Leigh: Order No: 1012043
Analytical Environmental Services,Inc. received 3 samples on 12/1/2010 10:50:00 AM
for the analyses presented in following repor..
.w problems were encountered during the analyses.Additionally,all results for the associated
Yuaiity Control samples were within EPA and/or AES established limits. Any discrepancies
associated with me analyses contained nerem will De notes ana submlttea in me rorm oI
project Case ivarranv.
AFC' rnrtifirations arP ac fnivn”s-
srFi A C/Florida Certification number E87582 for analysis of Environmental Water.
:oii/hazardous waste.and Drinking Water Microbiology.effective 07/01/10-06/30/11.
-AMA uertlhcatlon Iv 7 to b r 1 tnr 7,-,..�.-., - ,_ -
Environmental Lead(Paint, Soil,Dust Wipes,Air),and Environmental Microbiology
uffAnt; "fa no/nt •-
These results relate only to the items tested. This report may only be reproduced in full.
if you have any questions regarding these test results. niease fcci free L ck -
I
Brian
rroiect ivlanae_

I ),
Colonial Pipeline Company
.,
•;-•
Chain of Custody Record
— ...__ . ._
i:
?, Colonial Location: Return Original Faros D. Leigh Preservative Ship To:
Results To:(Name)r . Anal rtici . Em se . 11!'
.f.
4 . 4111aftggrairl Rd. Atti : Si :pie E.!:e,i i i LI I
' • Greensboro Greensboro, NC 27409 378!. Pre:. , en! ii.:IL i ii:, .
, , _---- :Atli ita, l;ti, .:' :I 241
SamPkifts):(Signalurt Name,Company.Address-send copy Of results) ,--
Farah D. Leigh Analysesliequired
Colonial Pipeline Company
411 Gallinore Dairy Rd. Pri
0
Mmmilsbmm4 NC 27409 A w Phone f'inter I"(1:11_ :ii 1- I :; i
i U 0
NJ isi MI .. ...__ . ... __
Corded Phone Number: (336) 294-9737 4) 0 I Alibi P inber:
... __
.
litnnbet
• Dale Time Sample Description Of i 4,) ra Matrix ' Fit ri4
Containers .II. A • ____ ___ -
_
/ -11--b / 7 •'/ / — Soi Composite *1 (Spray Fields 1-6) 2 X l
• op v5 Composite 2 (Spray Fields 7-11) 2 X Sol '
: I I-- ----- ----,-. - - --
0! ?O! Composite *3 (Spray Fields 12-11) 2 X Sol '
• _ i i I i ...7-_i i '1 -i
_ H
___•-.
. .
•
•
. . . - -• .. _ ___. _
Relinquished By:(Signature) DeiefTime Relinquished By:(Signature) Dale/tine Receivt I For Lat ratory 131 t ii , f
.. xx4),,... 4
1(
[
.

Analytical Environmental Services,Inc Date: 16-Dec-1'
""-at: Colonial Pipeline Company Client Sample ID: COMPOSITE#1(SPRAY FIELI I
Project: Greensboro Collection Date: 11/30/2010 8:00:00 AM
1
I Lab ID: 1 0 1 2043-0vi ivia*r's _ "
Analyses Result importingQual Units Batchth "�t` Late Analvzeu AU.:
Limit Fact
Uuati ien: vaiue Qcrr,i4 maximum contaminant hew. E aitimaiw I,d)re suu,e yw:ouu:uw.1 ru:,

Analytical Environmental Services,Inc Date: 16-Dec-10
I Client: Colonial Pipeline Company Client Sample ID: COMPOSITE#2(SPRAY FIELI
I Project: Greensboro Collection Date: 11/30/2010 9:15:00 AM
:Lab M: 1012043-002 Matrix: Soil I
�Yc —rig Dtion
.�aaiyses Result emit Qual Units BatchID F ctor Date Analyzed Analyst
Total Organic Carbon SW9060A Modified (SW9060 Modified)
Total Organic Carbon(TOC) 11600 500 mg/Kg-dry 138918 1 12/06/2010 15:27 GR
Laboratory Hydrogen Ion(pH) SW9045D (SW9045D)
pH 7.16 0.01 H pH Units 138962 1 12/03/2010 12:15 CG
CEC of Soils(NH4 Saturation) SW9080 (SW90801
Cation Exchange Capacity 10 1.0 N meq/100g 139280 1 12/132010 00:00 LV
Available Phosphorus,soils E365.1 (E365.1)
Phosphorus.Total(As P) 37.5 0.497 mg/Kg-dry 139056 1 12/08/2010 12:48 LV
METALS,TOTAL SW6010C. (S W.%J Ub,
Calcium 4.33 0.0050 meq/100g-dry 139057 1 12/09201020:38 MP
ronner 7.03 0.559 mg/Kg-dry 139053 1 12/13/2010 16:04 MP
Macnesium 1.56 0.0080 meNloog-dry 139057 1 12/09201020:38 MP
Manganese 409 , 11.2 mg/Kg-thy 139053 10 12/072010 00:22 MP
Potassium 0.269 0.0130 meq/IWg-dry 139057 I 12/09/201ozu.sa
Sodium 0.302 0.0435 meq/100g-dry 139057 1 12/09/2010 20:38 Ml
Zinc 16.7 1.12 mg/Kg-dry 139053 1 12/1320101o:u4 na;
. i rct:ENT MOISTURE D2216
?ercent Moisture 13.4 0 wrY. R186102 1 12/06/2010 16:00 AS
OnalKsys: • Value exceeds maximum contaminant level E Estimated(value above m anmanon nun.
,RL Below mooning limit a spine Recovery outside limits due to mains
noosing mom for pseparaum or analysis exceeded xNarr See case entrance
.. Analyse not NELAC certified NC Na continued
B Analvte detected in the associated method hi..:
> Greater tom Ream•::.
5 of

136 Fairview Road
Suite 125
Mooresville, NC 28117
Telephone: [phone]
panies, LLC Facsimile: 704-799-6395
Ap
erexcellence Meets Vcifue"
February 1, 2008 RECEIVED
N.C.Dept.of ENR
FEB 1 2 2008
Winston-Salem
Regional Office
Mr. Alan W. Klimek, PE
Director
Division of Water Quality I ; o o /,'�' S t/il
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1617 Mail Service Canter
Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1617 i
7
Subject: Lagoon Closure Plan -
Existing Permit No. WQ0006317 i '-�e 90Ai—� f
Colonial Pipeline Company—Greensboro,North Carolina
Apex Project No. 510151.001 -2 2 FCe r
Dear Mr. Klimek: '`✓iy,,' �e I--,
re 5t e4 of ..,rea„
Apex Companies, LLC (Apex), on behalf of our client Colonial Pipeline Company(Colonial), is sending
the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality(DWQ)
this Closure Plan for the inactive lagoon which was a potion of the existing on-site wastewater treatment
system. A Notice of Lagoon Closure was submitted to you on January 12, 2007 illustrating Colonial's
intent to permanently close a small (147,000-gallon)impoundment in accordance with state regulations.
In response,we received a copy of Guidelines for the Closure of Treatment Ponds and Lagoons dated
August 18, 2003 for compliance. All correspondence with the DWQ is included in Appendix A of this
letter. Figure 1 shows the approximate location of the impoundment and the direction of groundwater
flow beneath the site.
Soil Characterization Activities
In preparation for sludge characterization, Colonial transferred remaining liquids from the impoundment
to the active on-site aeration basin and allowed the sludge to dry. Apex personnel collected sludge
samples to be characterized from the above-referenced impoundment on August 31, 2007. Apex
collected and composited sludge material from five locations within the impoundment and submitted the
-c' Environmental -Q., Engineering -q, Water Resources -v Industrial Hygiene -0.,
-c Facility Services -' Construction Services -'

samples to Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. (AES) for characterization. The sludge samples were
analyzed for volatile organic compounds(VOCs), semi-volatile organic compounds, and lead by EPA
Methods 8260B, 8270B, and 6010B, respectively. Laboratory analytical results are presented as
Appendix B to this letter and show that naphthalene was the only compound detected in the sludge
sample.
Colonial personnel began excavating the sludge material from the impoundment on October 23, 2007.
The excavated sludge material was removed from the impoundment and land applied at the on-site land
farm in accordance with the conditions and limitations described in Permit No.WQ0005809. A copy of
the permit is included as Appendix C of this closure plan. The impoundment excavation is approximately
70-feet by 35-feet by 4-feet deep with sloping sidewalls and a bentonite lining which is approximately 2
to 3-feet deep along the sidewalls and the base. Apex personnel visited the site on November 1, 2007 to
collect soil samples from beneath the bentonite liner of the impoundment. Apex noticed at that time the
bentonite lining of the base had been removed during the excavation of the sludge materials.
Apex personnel utilized a hand auger to collect soil samples from the base and from beneath the
remaining bentonite-lined sidewalls of the impoundment. The sidewall and base samples were collected
from the underlying virgin soil material approximately 1 to 2 feet below the bentonite layer. A total of
seven soil samples were collected from the impoundment; one soil sample was collected from each of the
four sidewalls(CS-1 through CS-5)and three soil samples were collected along the base of the former
impoundment(CS-6 through CS-8). Figure 2 shows the impoundment and the approximate soil sample
locations. The seven soil samples were then placed into appropriate laboratory provided jars and
immediately placed on ice pending overnight delivery to Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. (AES)
in Atlanta, Georgia for analysis.
The soil samples were analyzed for volatile organic compounds(VOCs), semi-volatile organic
compounds(SVOCs), and lead by Methods 8260B, 8270B,and 6010B,respectively. A copy of the
laboratory analytical results is presented in Appendix B of this Closure Plan. According to the laboratory
analytical results,concentrations of petroleum constituents in the seven soil samples were not detected
above the laboratory's detection limits.
Proposed Lagoon Closure and Reclamation Activities
At this time,Colonial wishes to abandon the remaining lagoon in place by eliminating portions of the
sidewalls and incorporating the material in the existing area. After this incorporation,the area will be re-
graded to minimize the potential for rainfall or surface water accumulation. According to laboratory

analytical results the remaining soils located beneath the bentonite lining do not contain concentrations of
petroleum constituents above the laboratory's detection limits. Therefore, groundwater beneath the
impoundment in not likely to have been affected by previous operations of the treatment lagoon,nor is it
likely to affect the groundwater quality in the future.
To Apex's knowledge, Colonial will not utilize the former treatment lagoon for uses such as a treatment,
storage, or ornamental pond in the future and therefore will not need to conform to surface water quality
standards. Once the former lagoon area is re-graded, Colonial would like to complete the reclamation of
the area by applying straw and grass seed and allow the site to revegetate.
Colonial and Apex would like to move forward with this Closure Plan as soon as possible. Should you
have any questions regarding the information presented in this Closure Plan,please contact us at(704)
799-6390.
Sincerely,
APEX COMPANIES, LLC oN'' r• :. -
ham•~,Q�f+•, _�.
1 Y
Shiloh a b.� Bruce D. Reilly,P.fa
Environmental its tist Program Manager % 4).'''b.<" +;,<R0y.�
r`,
Cc: Faron Leigh, Colonial Pipeline Company

FIGURES

t _.
FIGURE 1
SITE PLAN
• ,, .s1'8
Colonial Pipeline Company
Grenboro Junction
ai Greensboro, North Carolina
825
F
N
•
4 , ,,,,,,
, , .
i db,„ f
i ..,
- -77 ,--. , - .
.,. .
. ..,
, $39 ; ,.....
3 836'
�� 411 ) , , ---,,
835
---,. g 833
/si 832
4- ,i. ,% • _
,...7 .4:;.. _, 'E
,7
rI -•,,,.__
• Legend
Groundwater Elevation Contour(Oct 2007)
■ Property Line
N i
250 500 1 ,000 Feet
APEX COMPANIES LLC.
MOORESVILLE,NORTH CAROLINA
07 SCALE:
510169.001 FIGURE NO: 1
0: FILE NO: FIGURE 3-POT MAP.mxd

t
N
70'
(*********--- •CS-3@5'
( )
I CS-8@2' CS-7@2'
• . •
35' CS-5@4' I • CS-6@2' I CS-2@5'
I I
J
Bottom of Slope /
• CS-1 @4'
.0/.2
Top of Slope 7
Legend:
• Soil Sample Locations
bate: Project Ms
136 Fairview Road, Suite 125 2/1/08 COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANY
A Mooresville, NC 28117 FIGURE 2 brown By: Lagoon Closure Plan
X Telephone: [phone] FORMER AERATION BASIN CAH Greensboro, North Carolina
® Fax: [phone] SOIL SAMPLE LOCATIONS Project
sct Nu be.00 .CADMr N/a Seale S. Client. CPC
Companies. Id.0

APPENDIX A
DWQ CORRESPONDENCE

August 18, 2003
MEMORANDUM
TO: Groundwater Regional Supervisors
Permits& Compliance Unit
Operations Branch
FROM: Arthur Mouberry, P.E.
Chief, Groundwater Section
SUBJECT: Guidelines for the Closure of Treatment Ponds and Lagoons
Purpose: The purpose of these guidelines is to protect the quality of the groundwater resources
of the state while accomplishing the closure of a treatment pond or lagoon.
Background: Man-made treatment ponds and lagoon type structures are used to contain fluids
and semi-solids for a variety of reasons. As these ponds and lagoons become no longer
necessary, the structure needs to be abandoned in an environmentally friendly manner. The
Groundwater Section's major concern with the elimination of these structures is that
groundwater remains protected both during and after abandonment. Each structure must be
considered for its unique circumstances on a case-by-case basis.
Regulations relevant to the abandonment of ponds and lagoons for ground waters of the state
include the Classifications and Water Quality Standards found in Title 15A NCAC 2L. Other
pertinent standards and regulations may be found in the DENR Land Resources regulations
pertaining to Sedimentation and Erosion Control and Dam Safety, the DENR Waste
Management regulations pertaining to the disposal of wastes and sludge, and the NCDOT
regulations pertaining to transportation of materials on public highways. Lagoons for animal
waste are regulated under the federal NRCS Standards.
Recommended Procedure:
The major elements of pond and lagoon structures include the contents,the walls, the floor and
the liner, if one exists. Each element must be characterized for its quantity and material
properties in order to prepare a closure plan. Guidelines for the preparation of this plan are
described in the following steps:
1) Collect and assemble field information by characterizing the structural elements and
liquid contents, including bottom sludge in the impoundment. Sampling will be required
in most situations, and the types of sampling and analyses will depend on factors such as
what the lagoon was used for, its construction materials (earthen, concrete, natural or
synthetic liner), and size. The samples must be representative of the medium sampled,
and the rationale for the depths, locations and number of samples should be justified and
documented in preparation of being legally defensible. The sampling must be performed
Lagoon Closure final.doc Page 1 of 3

under the direction of a qualified individual and analyzed by a DWQ Certified
Laboratory.
2) Prepare and submit a Closure Plan to the DWQ regional office at least 30 days prior to
commencing deconstruction activities. This should include as a minimum:
a. the quantity and characteristics (TCLP, nutrients, metals) of the materials for
disposal (contents, walls, floor and liner), including the calculations used to
determine volumes,
b. an assessment of alternatives (actions, costs and timing) in sufficient detail to
select an optimum approach consistent with minimal groundwater impact,
c. a proposed method for removal/disposal, including the abandonment and salvage
of any physical equipment, and a timetable for the project,
d. site reclamation plan and section view of the treatment, storage and disposal
area(s),
e. vicinity map, and
f. location map to scale showing items such as the location of sampling points,
existing monitoring and supply wells (within 500 feet), depth to groundwater,
direction of groundwater flow, roads, structures, and rock outcrops.
3) If the structure is to be retained for an ornamental pond, storage or any other function
other than for treatment, then the Closure Plan will need to demonstrate that the residuals
of treatment(e.g. physical connections, bottom sludge, coliforms, nutrients and metals)
conform to all appropriate surface water standards.
If the structure is to be abandoned in place (totally or partially), sampling of the
underlying native soil, whether it has a natural or synthetic liner, is required. If the
sampling determines that the soil is contaminated, , then the Closure Plan will need to
demonstrate, by modeling or numerical calculations, that leaving the contents and or
structure materials in place will not cause a contravention of the groundwater quality
standards in the groundwater beneath the structure. If the modeling does not demonstrate
this, than removal or treatment of the soils must be included as part of the Closure Plan.
If it were an earthen structure,the preferable approach would be to completely eliminate
the walls and incorporate the material in the existing site.
4) Any land disturbing activity associated with the closure activities that affect more than
one (1)acre of land must have an erosion and sediment control plan approved by the
Land Quality Section of the Division of Land Resources. NC General Statute 113A-
57(4) requires this plan to be submitted at least thirty (30) days prior to beginning the
land-disturbing activity.
Closure Documentation:
Lagoon Closure final.doc Page 2 of 3

Upon completion of the closure, the owner should submit documentation to the DWQ regional
office with the following:
1) A description of all actions taken and dates relative to the abandonment.
2) Copies of all pertinent correspondence with private, local, state and/or federal agencies.
3) Ultimate disposal sites with weigh tickets or processing verifications, as appropriate.
4) Certification by a Professional Engineer(PE)or Professional Geologist(PG) if the pond or
lagoon:
a) is greater than five (5)acres in total area,
b) contains hazardous substances as defined by TCLP tests, or
c) involves a breaching of a dam, which could impose a safety hazard to persons or property
below it.
Lagoon Closure final.doc Page 3 of 3

811 Burke Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27101
Telephone: [phone]
Companies, l_LC Facsimile: 336-722-2453
"Where Excellence Meets Value"
January 11,2007
CERTIFIED MAIL—RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED 7005 0390 0001 0561 2997
Mr.Alan W. Klimek, PE
Director
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
1617 Mail Center
Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1617
Subject: Notice of Lagoon Closure
Existing Permit No.WQ0006317
Colonial Pipeline Company—Greensboro,North Carolina
Apex Project No.510151.001
Dear Mr. Klimek:
Apex Companies, LLC, (Apex), on behalf of our client Colonial Pipeline Company (Colonial), is
sending the Division of Water Quality this letter formally notifying you of Colonial's intent to close an
inactive lagoon which was a portion of the existing wastewater treatment system referenced above.
The existing permit is for the collection, treatment and land application via spray irrigation of
wastewater removed from petroleum product storage tanks. This permit was initially issued in
February 1977 with the latest revision dated October 28, 2005. A copy of the latest revision of the
permit is included with this letter as an attachment.
The planned lagoon closure involves the small (147,000-gallon) impoundment and closure of the
impoundment in accordance with state regulations. Wastewater collected from the product storage
tanks will continue to be treated, but only in the larger impoundment and then discharged in
accordance with the permit. We will provide your unit with a copy of the required closure plan and
certification of the closure of impoundment for your files.
-, Environmental -t-, Engineering -c Water Resources -c' Industrial Hygiene
- , Facility Services Construction Services -.,

Lagoon Closure Letter-DWQ January/I,2007
Colonial Pipeline Company-Greensboro-WQ0006317 Page 2 of 2
Apex Project No.510151.001
Colonial intends to begin closure activities on the small impoundment the first week of February 2007.
Please feel free to contact us directly should you or your staff have any questions/comments.
Sincerely,
APEX COMPANIES,LLC .
Bruce D.Reilly Jeffrey Titus,P.G.
Program Manager Division Manager
Attachment
Cc: Mr.Faron Leigh—Colonial Pipeline Company,Greensboro
Mr.Darren Pruitt—Colonial Pipeline Company,Greensboro
Mr.Jeff Richards—Colonial Pipeline Company,Ringgold,GA

ATTACHMENT
PERMIT WQ0006317

w2 ai'�2ti./'t l+/. its �i 1f t tti.�'i�Y� .� - �-. -.'-1 t ` ,,� i 1-_� ti ., % -tt�t ti.y\ .t
Yl .:aii:f3: .i.:�i irl:til•:��L1�zt !:t ' : '. '': L t j i ,t t s i . __ _•_
-LJJI'i:y.�[sk �1SG,yy 'lJ-..L�(i1.. t,iA �\.�ililr6✓.....P/_]'T1:T--}- n:.I..r �')Y..d!:� � Y'�,
OFWAT
OS d\ 4� i!O RE CEIVED Michael F.Easley,Governor
r n William G.Ross Jr.,Secretary
y y 7 200,5 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
O .t"
Alan W.Klimek,P.E.Direct--
f)ivisinn of 1"a•.c:
October 28, 2005
Mr. To G /� AT x.
anager o peratlons
Colonial Pipeline Company i
P.O. Box 1624 "1 i1 J-1
Alpharetta- ( eorg;a 30009.993 ;
Subject: Permit No. WQ0006317
Colonial Pipeline Conrr-:ny
Wastewater Surface 1::..:ation
Dear Mr. Guzikowski: Guilford County
In accordance with your application for permit renewal received January 9 2002, a request for
permit modification received July 26, 2002, and subsequent additional information, we are forwarding
herewith Permit No. WQ0006317, dated October 28, 2005, to the Colonial Pipeline Company for the
continued operation of the subject wastewater treatment and surface irrigation facilities. P Y
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2010, shall void
Permit No. WQ0006317 issued July 15, 1997, and shall be subject to the conditions and limitations
specified therein. Please note that, although the 147,000-gallon lagoon has been removed from the
description of the facility, Permit Condition Number VI.1 requires the submission of a Closure Planas
the lagoon and decommissioned spray fields. Also note that the spray area has been reduced fromfor
acres with 24 spray heads to 3.69 acres with 17 spray heads. Please pay 5.particular attention to the
e
monitoring requirements in this permit. Failure to establish an adequate system for collectin a
maintaining the required operational information will result in future compliance problems. g nd
If any parts, requirements, or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable,
right to request an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) daysp following receipt of
p th of
this permit. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 15
North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service
of the
Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-6714. Unless such demands are made this permit shall be final and binding.
mdmg.
If you need additional information concerning this matter, please contact David Goodrich at(919)
( )
S incer
7 Z
-(—Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
cc: Guilford County Health Department
Winston-Salem Regional Office,Aquifer Protection Section
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
APS Central Files
LAU Files p,,e
fifer Protection Section 1636 Mail Service Center l.�.�Carolina
Raleigh,NC 27699-1636 Naturally
Phone(nuns 733-3221 Raleigh,NC 276pq Fe v (nuns��. ,..._ Customer Service
met: h2o.enr.state.nc.us 2728 Capital Boulevard

:: NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH
SURFACE IRRIGATION SYSTEM PERMIT
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143, General Statutes of North Carolina as
amended, and other applicable Laws, Rules, and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
luniai l i ittii+`; 4,.0 npany
Guilford County
FOR THE
continued operation of a 7,140 gallon per day (GPD) surface irrigation treatment and disposal facility
consisting of a holding tank, an oil/water separator, an air stripping unit, a 257,000 gallon clay-lined
aerated lagoon with two 5 HP aerators, approximately 420 linear feet of three inch suction line, an 80
GPM pump station, approximately 2,511 linear feet of three inch distribution force main, 2,820 linear feet
of four inch force main, 17 spray heads, 3.69 acres of spray area, and all associated pipe fittings, valves,
and appurtenances to serve Colonial Pipeline Company, with no discharge of wastes to the surface waters,
pursuant to the application received January 9, 2002, and subsequent additional information received by
the Division, and in conformity with the project plan, specifications, and other supporting data
subsequently filed and approved by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and
considered a part of this permit.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until September 30, 2010, shall void Permit
No. WQ0006317 issued July 15, 1997, and shall be subject to the following specified conditions and
limitations:
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
1. The surface irrigation facilities shall be effectively maintained and operated at all times so that there
is no discharge to the surface waters,nor any contamination of ground waters, which will render them
unsatisfactory for normal use. In the event that the facilities fail to perform satisfactorily, including
the creation of nuisance conditions or failure of the irrigation area to adequately assimilate the
wastewater, the Permittee shall take immediate corrective actions including those actions that may be
required by the Division of Water Quality, such as the construction of additional or replacement
wastewater treatment and disposal facilities.
2. The issuance of this permit shall not relieve the Permittee of the responsibility for damages to surface
or groundwaters resulting from the operation of this facility.
3. The residuals generated from these treatment facilities must be disposed in accordance with General
Statute 143-215.1 and in a manner approved by the Division.
4. Diversion or bypassing of the untreated wastewater from the treatment facilities is prohibited.
1

(.:;• ;; ; :;,:.active vegetative cover shall be established and maintained on all earthen basin embankments
:=->> .rs-,i i r side toe of embankment to maximum pumping elevation), berms, pipe runs, erosion control areas,
surface water diversions. Trees, shrubs, and other woody vegetation shall not be allowed to grow
on the earthen basin dikes or embankments. Earthen basin embankment areas shall be kept mowed or
otherwise controlled and accessible.
1?. The soil in the spray areas shall he maintained ahcwe a of 6 S.
III. MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
1. Any monitoring (including groundwater, surface water, soil or plant tissue analyses) deemed
necessary by the Division to insure surface and ground water protection will be established and an
acceptable sampling reporting schedule shall be followed.
2. Influent flow shall be continuously monitored and daily average flow values shall be reported on
Form NDMR. Flow may be estimated from water use records provided water use is metered. Daily
average values shall be calculated by dividing monthly flow volume by the number of days in the
month.
3. The effluent from the subject facilities shall be monitored by the Permittee at the point prior to
irrigation every March, July, and November for the following parameters:
NH3 as N NO,-NO3 Total Coliform
BOD5 TKN Total Phosphorous
TSS Sodium Magnesium
PH Calcium Sodium Adsorption Ratio by Calculation
Oil and Grease Chloride Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)
4. The Permittee tracking the amount of wastewater disposed shall maintain adequate records. These
records shall include, but are not necessarily limited to,the following information:
a. Date of irrigation,
b. Volume of wastewater irrigated,
c. Field irrigated,
d. Length of time field is irrigated
e. Continuous weekly, monthly, and year-to-date hydraulic (inches/acre) loadings for each field,
f. Weather conditions, and
g. Maintenance of cover crops.
5. Three (3)copies of all monitoring data [as specified in Conditions III(2) and III(3)] on Form NDMR-
1 and three (3) copies of all operation and disposal records [as specified in Condition III(4)] on Form
NDAR-1 shall be submitted on or before the last day of the following month. All information shall
be submitted to the following address:
Division of Water Quality
Information Processing Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1617
6. An annual representative soils analysis (Standard Soil Fertility Analysis) shall be conducted on each
irrigation field and the results maintained on file by the Permittee for a minimum of five years. The
Standard Soil Fertility Analysis shall include, but is not necessarily limited to, the following
parameters:
1

•
•
Volatile Organic Compounds(VOCs) shall be analyzed using one of the following methods:
i Standard Method 6230D(PQL at 0.5 ug/L or less),
ii. Standard Method 6210(PQL at 0.5 ug/L or less),
iii. EPA Method 8021 (Low Concentration, PQL at 0.5 ug/L or less),
iv. EPA Method 8260 (Low Concentration, PQL at 0.5 ug/L or less), or
v. Another method with prior approval by the Division.
Any of the rPFPr, a ._. J L y C` �. a, at a minimum, include all of the constituents
listed in Table VIII of Standard Methods 6230D. The method used shall provide a PQL at 0.5
ug/L or less, which shall be supported by laboratory proficiency studies as required by the
Division's Laboratory Certification Unit. Any constituents detected above the MDL, but below
the PQL of 0.5 ug/L, shall be qualified (i.e., estimated) and reported.
c. Any laboratory selected to analyze parameters shall be Division-certified for those parameters
required.
2. Reporting/Documentation Requirements
a. The results of the sampling and analysis shall be received on the most-recent version of
"Groundwater Quality Monitoring: Compliance Report Form" (i.e., GW-59 Form) with copies of
the laboratory analyses attached by the Division's Aquifer Protection Section on or before the last
working day of the month following the sampling month.
b. All reports, maps, and other documents required in the "Groundwater Requirements" section of
this permit shall be mailed to the following address:
NCDENR-DWQ
Information Processing Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Updated blank reporting and other forms may be downloaded from the web site for the Division's
Aquifer Protection Section at httn://ew.ehnr state ne us/or requested from the address listed
above.
3. Vertical Separation Requirements
a. Waste application activities shall not occur when the vertical separation between depth of
application and the water table is at less than three (3) feet. Verification of the water table
elevation can be achieved by taking water level readings in the monitor wells near the site.
4. Applicable Boundary Requirements
a. The COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY for the disposal system is specified by regulations in 15A
NCAC 2L, Groundwater Classifications and Standards. The Compliance Boundary for the
disposal system individually permitted prior to December 31, 1983 is established at either 500
feet from the waste disposal area, or at the property boundary,
is closer to the waste
disposal area. An exceedance of Groundwater Quality Standards at orver beyond the Compliance
Boundary is subject to immediate remediation action according to 15A NCAC 2L .0106(d)(2).

riie issuance of this permit does not exempt the Permittee from complying with any and all statutes,
rules, regulations, or ordinances which may be imposed by other government agencies (local, state,
and federal) which have jurisdiction, including but not limited to applicable river buffer rules in 15A
NCAC 2B .0200, erosion and sedimentation control requirements in 15A NCAC Chapter 4 and under
the Division's General Permit 1\CGU10000, and any requirements pertaining to wetlands under 15A
NCAC 2B .0200 and 2H .0500.
7. The Permittee shall retain a set of approved plans and specifications for the life of the project.
8. The Permittee must pay the annual administering and compliance fee within thirty (30) days after
being billed by the Division. Failure to pay the fee accordingly may cause the Division to initiate
action to revoke this permit as specified by 15A NCAC 2H .0205 (c)(4).
9. The Permittee, at least six (6) months prior to the expiration of this permit, shall request its
extension. Upon receipt of the request, the Commission will review the adegi.m y of the
facilities described therein, and if warranted, will extend the permit for such period of time
and under such conditions and limitations as it may deem appropriate.
Permit issued this the 28th day of October, 2005.
NORTH C OLINA V ONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
./Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Permit Number WQ0006317

--•• •
,. --______ ._,:____- - •:,..‘.• ,•4.
•1, ,c,'••-; .. •••!;,i
jj. • . '.„•——— •• ••••1
• t.4,4 •••a•
...O.'
\.._____,,_ _____-......----••—••• .... •.•' ci'—---r
1,1-,/-",;-'..;•:.
.."t•-:"- - .'•.!
....t. •• •• ••••••I
•'t • , •••1
:‘,'T ,,, ,;.,:•', ll 2 '
••• :..."^'''' ___-.--T----------- (
••• 47. ;.$ ••',.--....,f t1- ' . :V.:: ..••r..';
•
1. •••,_ .
_.i .:.--- _.......--.„„-, ; ,,--.:\ .•••••-\ 0 kiii) ' ..• ', • , ,
.1.il.
i, ,--
1,1 •,e,
47\ •D (Ts, ass ,)
. ...
.. . ......,.,
•. ...y. • • s..,..., ‘ -• ., . :._ ,,,.. JP,k 1.'4. , ,
-•, i,=.==t=..=.===."=0\--z --==--==_----:,• ,
P... •••,••••,,
• '
Ii ... 1 .n,z-j,,,:;' : ./ _—,-_-_----_____
... -- • .,--,,•:..;
..,
--ro (Th.. , .-.^ C.:7)17..i: a oil...; -- •uz' ?r."
..„....
Hy ..•11 '?: ..',,,z ...,
..,,," •--- -- -" ,.
, . .
-' •
. _-,..•• 'ill, %7‘
L '...,... _-....-..„.i-- -...;.---....-....-_......srCet::•..--,r¢7:, :Y ' .‘,,•:..;
I,..'''' •'• '• '-'-'.'—'.T'7., ,,.!:( . -,....1,...,,... '' •....90-.• ••••'i.•. ..:,; ,/ . —
EiID
,...---,
••••. r'—'\ • .C:.;":',77,' :71-7:7-7:-:. ,-.. g• --.,1 n .. . .0; •'.'n'.; . S..n.
11:'... L f:)' ...1... ."=!. ..1 ''....'"-M'l' • ••.' • . • 1't .....• ' •' - •• ••' / .‘ S n c.."... • .. \ ...-
• I. . ". ... ';'• •1-4ci•• ... . . .•.•. • • jr..."1:4 7:' I. . '' .:; • ( •
..•'• ..,., -.c. '
1 .':''.1.;.•:m a .....•../'• ‘i.-:••r• ••r•;••,"•:-...', • • ! .;:2. .e'. .;,...41 i .. nn'-'-C:(' (- ‘' ', ‘1--/ '. „..------
• .. -•.?,;•••sox 4,3 0.:
. • \
,T•• ,..•••,'.7•T,•• I•. - 0 • ''.•\ -, 0.4 .I „,„,......4. •ks ) „.„ .,. ,,,___,,
1. I, 1'1-'1 i''.7`) 3 •L'o,...• ....—= . . ...;11'7.441, 4t,Lo4 /,' ....*,,.1 or )k " ..'"___---•,----"-,. ---, ‘,,s i. . ''' .• ' ' .".
1 i: ......2'./,.....:‘,2/.. ....7...z.v,..;,,—,•••..,.. a.=.,.--..,7.77,-s=f,..,...cz.,-1 v.:=.==let:W.\i:1' ,. •6 ,T '7 \ ,.....1.. --.. -- .5) •4,, -:;..._...., c ' MO ,, . •'....._,..
'N .
11 il '1 k‘', ' .. .' - . .-•• •C.-'••N.', ' WI •-
\
0 1:0 I (j .(:.• ..:1 ill : 'ili.7f...".?-:7;:i. %.' 'j.... .1 '-'."'S.' t::::'''''‘:\;'-'i.., .‘I'' '‘,... ' ,' N.
..... \....::::..),. ,, . —.14' •,:l /—•'" •''''. ' 4.:' ' ' • '. ® ---/ . .e..".
• •:t, li . 74.' P''•• '''' '': ! ) `is,
- —f o• \ ,
,,L••.,;-• •••••— •=0..5 .•
,1 II
.. ., .4. I •.
--„.
I o•---N .,,_ _--_. _ t:11". ••- t -. •
•—•••''' 1 ..i ® : - f ''... . ,:, --- _77`.7,_„.., ..,.,.‘47,:' t,. . ...•:.1,:.;;;•,..../4 :.- • •''', ••," • - 1•4-'ti-‘,"`"?'-:- ----- -- .. ''- * ---" " .•
• .
'\::../ II I ,. . • ^ \-1 - A - - I,. •A
I .I ......_.P.1-• ---- , le II"P ,.. -•••••i;• (;"-.<,' -• '--• • \‘':, it-•-•‘• • -,,s -.... s -:;---\ ----.
....------- . ••
... y ii ..)...• , • ' t c'ri•a ;',-• ..•.;!, k
'‘. . .
li • ' . "t ..... .....,,, 1. ,,.—___,‘, t, .,,,,,.. ,. \,‘ „____, ‘ .
.. -
A / •1L ...f.;,'-.., •=•=...... ..,... .f. .. ....°.; ''.• .0.4'''/ i'", ol '';',.•'''f•••• i ,.....2-- i,.. •••••—•Rk' '".'' '''
•-Z,=-z.‘-r-••==------— 's- -, ... ''-' " ,) tt .A.:.---- •l-: k •ii ••• rz. :;-,zsi, .._.-- 1,‘ . ...._,-,-._.,:.„.- • , ',. ‘ ' r \,, .0..t;if. f\...,0 ;,;.::,•'.. •-• !•‘. ,
-----i'.The• . ,-•--. ,,\_.:.,,, \. ....., .. st ,
/ ' .‘ ' ii I.:;-:-.. .1- '. . // ,._ •-..,-7-- -- .,_=--- .-, , •-; _ \,
,- _-__•......--, . --I, • -- — .• j '''.. 's. ' ::::.) ' •
„..
s,;•;/. I. ;!..,?•':•'•-• ; . ,. 0,-• ••__. • ... • .--:-.". --. —
\ - •••—•••'\ \ \ ‘....-.•'•
' I 0.7. i'',‘,;‘,..4.<•----..-2ii 14,.• ,. _ i , .
, ---. , .:.... ' N /•••‘••••"'
0 4' •••`• (1...,
••.: \
‘ • ' \__, , s, .,„,9.f. .•••
..., .0...
-- - .
•• - •••• • 11 W-2 %, - , • r 1 /75z•---N.0 •\\•:,' - ' \
-- • '., tivu-8 ,, Pt W.-:I 0,._ ' / -•,•7?-ri \. -,),, " - --- -" - ---- ''- '
•• . ,..,..:„.,..-
1,--
,..
, _ , .. • . . \ .., \,-------- ,• .-- ;
On ,
•
.
_ _ • , \ ,,• .
....••••. ----
. .. •
_ . •.. • //E..)11 4 • ' ',..,‘1\i- -
' \------- -• ' ‘,•=3:••=--"tf-!---7------
,-. rau-7 '. .. Itl•,.
- •,,
••_- ,---i•-- ..„....2„.....,_________
.",-.)..,.. , • 1 ,
. .
6 l
\ • \ .-.•-...
• ••• •••
•••••./••••,ergs is.°
' --...-..Y-r. ....,•': il
\ sie
.• \ ..t. ../.....1„. ',:
......
, 0.:..,,.---- T„, • • A• \
• •.• -t;
ti '- -.?1°!7' ' . • •-. ___ . _ _._
_. .. •
•
--,,....,:', --,--• . • , •
. ,
mem:e.....••••••ei, ' —14'?4,---..--, ' .!..i...- •,
.,a-, t„...„...r•-"" ,
I
P.•••••••{m•
. I .
..
,0.... ,.. A w....54 \3...,.......;;.:::.•: s.i
•2
•
,..
\ ':"..' .. Or 0. ..'•
\ .., • . l•' :1:11•.11,
..rbf
. .....a5,....„ '"•-•,!-- . _.•
- -- - ---- ...
1):i!. .1:
__ ._
___. FIGURE 2
•
..,.. • _.
, COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANY
T: • -•\ ...,..0 •',
«I...A ••••
..
s ...1.-
GREENSBORO TERMINAL
SPRAY IRRIGATION SYSTEM
GUILFORD COUNTY
NAKy10901:7
SITF. nvT A TT NN A VI

APPENDIX B
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. Date: 05-Nov-07
CLIENT: Colonial Pipeline Company Client Sample ID: CS-1@ 4'
Project: CPC-GBJ Lagoon Closure Collection Date: 11/1/2007 10:00:00 AM
Lab ID: 0711095-001 Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Reporting Qual Units BatcbID Dilution Date Analyzed
Limit Factor
METALS,TOTAL SW6010B (SW3050B) Analyst: TF
Lead 6.99 6.68 mg/Kg-dry 92980 1 11/2/2007 5:51 PM
TCL-SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS SW8270C (SW3550A) Analyst: YH
1,1'-Biphenyl BRL 470 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 7:30 PM
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol BRL 2400 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 7:30 PM
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol BRL 470 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 7:30 PM
2,4-Dichlorophenol BRL 470 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 7:30 PM
2,4-Dimethylphenol BRL 470 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 7:30 PM
2,4-Dinitrophenol BRL 2400 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 7:30 PM
2,4-Dinitrotoluene BRL 470 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 7:30 PM
2,6-Dinitrotoluene BRL 470 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 7:30 PM
2-Chloronaphthalene BRL 470 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 7:30 PM
2-Chlorophenol BRL 470 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 7:30 PM
2-Methylnaphthalene BRL 470 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 7:30 PM
2-Methylphenol BRL 470 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 7:30 PM
2-Nitroaniline BRL 2400 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 7:30 PM
2-Nitrophenol BRL 470 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 7:30 PM
3,3"-Dichlorobenzidine BRL 960 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 7:30 PM
3-Nitroaniline BRL 2400 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 7:30 PM
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol BRL 2400 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 7:30 PM
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether BRL 470 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 7:30 PM
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol BRL 470 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 7:30 PM
4-Chloroaniline BRL 470 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 7:30 PM
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether BRL 470 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 7:30 PM
4-Methylphenol BRL 470 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 7:30 PM
4-Nitroaniline BRL 2400 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 7:30 PM
4-Nitrophenol BRL 2400 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 7:30 PM
Acenaphthene BRL 470 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 7:30 PM
Acenaphthylene BRL 470 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 7:30 PM
Acetophenone BRL 470 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 7:30 PM
Anthracene BRL 470 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 7:30 PM
Atrazine BRL 470 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 7:30 PM
Benz(a)anthracene BRL 470 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 7:30 PM
Benzaldehyde BRL 470 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 7:30 PM
Benzo(a)pyrene BRL 470 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 7:30 PM
Benzo(b)fluoranthene BRL 470 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 7:30 PM
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene BRL 470 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 7:30 PM
Benzo(k)fluoranthene BRL 470 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 7:30 PM
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane BRL 470 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 7:30 PM
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether BRL 470 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 7:30 PM
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether BRL 470 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 7:30 PM
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate BRL 470 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 7:30 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level E Estimated(Value above quantitation range)
BRL Below Reporting Limit S Surrogate Recovery outside accepted recovery limits
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded Nan See Case Narrative
N Analyte not NELAC certified NC Not Confirmed
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank Page 1 of 30

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. Date: 05-Nov-07
CLIENT: Colonial Pipeline Company Client Sample ID: CS-2 @ 5'
Project: CPC-GBJ Lagoon Closure Collection Date: 11/1/2007 10:35:00 AM
Lab ID: 0711095-002 Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Reporting Qual Units BatchlD Dilution Date Analyzed
Limit Factor
TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS SW8260B (SW5035) Analyst: PV
Surr:4-Bromofluorobenzene 80.0 57.7-127 %REC 92991 1 11/2/2007 3:50 PM
Surr:Dibromofluoromethane 86.6 61.7-143 %REC 92991 1 11/2/2007 3:50 PM
Surr:Toluene-d8 99.5 73-127 %REC 92991 1 11/2/2007 3:50 PM
PERCENT MOISTURE D2216 Analyst: ZA
Percent Moisture 27.1 0 wt% 1 11/2/2007 3:45 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level E Estimated(Value above quantitation range)
BRL Below Reporting Limit S Surrogate Recovery outside accepted recovery limits
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded Narr See Case Narrative
N Analyte not NELAC certified NC Not Confirmed
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank Page 8 of 30

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. Date: 05-Nov-07
CLIENT: Colonial Pipeline Company Client Sample ID: CS-3 @ 5'
Project: CPC-GBJ Lagoon Closure Collection Date: 11/1/2007 10:50:00 AM
Lab ID: 0711095-003 Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Reporting Qual Units BatchlD Dilution Date Analyzed
Limit Factor
METALS,TOTAL SW6010B (SW3050B) Analyst: TF
Lead BRL 6.12 mg/Kg-dry 92980 1 11/2/2007 5:56 PM
TCL-SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS SW8270C (SW3550A) Analyst: YH
1,1'-Biphenyl BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol BRL 2300 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
2,4-Dichlorophenol BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
2,4-Dimethylphenol BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
2,4-Dinitrophenol BRL 2300 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
2,4-Dinitrotoluene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
2,6-Dinitrotoluene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
2-Chloronaphthalene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
2-Chlorophenol BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
2-Methylnaphthalene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
2-Methylphenol BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
2-Nitroaniline BRL 2300 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
2-Nitrophenol BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine BRL 910 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
3-Nitroaniline BRL 2300 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol BRL 2300 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
4-Chloroaniline BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
4-Methylphenol BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
4-Nitroaniline BRL 2300 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
4-Nitrophenol BRL 2300 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
Acenaphthene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
Acenaphthylene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
Acetophenone BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
Anthracene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
Atrazine BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
Benz(a)anthracene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
Benzaldehyde BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
Benzo(a)pyrene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
Benzo(b)fluoranthene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
Benzo(k)fluoranthene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level E Estimated(Value above quantitation range)
BRL Below Reporting Limit S Surrogate Recovery outside accepted recovery limits
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded Narr See Case Narrative
N Analyte not NELAC certified NC Not Confirmed
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank Page 9 of 30

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. Date: 05-Nov-07
CLIENT: Colonial Pipeline Company Client Sample ID: CS-3 @ 5'
Project: CPC-GBJ Lagoon Closure Collection Date: 11/1/2007 10:50:00 AM
Lab ID: 0711095-003 Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Reporting Qual Units BatcbID Dilution Date Analyzed
Limit Factor
TCL-SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS SW8270C (SW3550A) Analyst: YH
Butyl benzyl phthalate BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
Caprolactam BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
Carbazole BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
Chrysene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
Dibenzofuran BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
Diethyl phthalate BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
Dimethyl phthalate BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
Di-n-butyl phthalate BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
Di-n-octyl phthalate BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
Fluoranthene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
Fluorene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
Hexachlorobenzene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
Hexachlorobutadiene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
Hexachlorocycopentadiene BRL 890 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
Hexachloroethane BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
Isophorone BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
Naphthalene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
Nitrobenzene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
Pentachlorophenol BRL 2300 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
Phenanthrene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
Phenol BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
Pyrene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
Surr:2,4,6-Tribromophenol 85.8 46.8-133 %REC 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
Sum 2-Fluorobiphenyl 78.5 51.5-120 %REC 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
Surr:2-Fluorophenol 68.6 34.7-120 %REC 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
Sum 4-Terphenyl-d14 82.1 46.6-121 %REC 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
Sun:Nitrobenzene-d5 72.2 39.2-120 %REC 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
Sun:Phenol-d5 74.4 41.9-120 %REC 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:27 PM
TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS SW8260B (SW5035) Analyst: PV
1,1,1-Trichloroethane BRL 4.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
1,1,2,2-Tetachloroethane BRL 4.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
1,1,2-Trichloroethane BRL 4.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
1,1-Dichloroethane BRL 4.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
1,1-Dichloroethene BRL 4.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene BRL 4.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane BRL 4.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
1,2-Dibromoethane BRL 4.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level E Estimated(Value above quantitation range)
BRL Below Reporting Limit S Surrogate Recovery outside accepted recovery limits
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded Narr See Case Narrative
N Analyte not NELAC certified NC Not Confirmed
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank Page 10 of 30

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. Date: 05-Nov-07
CLIENT: Colonial Pipeline Company Client Sample ID: CS-3 @ 5'
Project: CPC-GBJ Lagoon Closure Collection Date: 11/1/2007 10:50:00 AM
Lab ID: 0711095-003 Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Reporting Qual Units BatchlD Dilution Date Analyzed
Limit Factor
TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS SW8260B (SW5035) Analyst: PV
1,2-Dichlorobenzene BRL 4.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
1,2-Dichloroethane BRL 4.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
1,2-Dichloropropane BRL 4.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
1,3-Dichlorobenzene BRL 4.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
1,4-Dichlorobenzene BRL 4.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
2-Butanone BRL 43 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
2-Hexanone BRL 8.7 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
4-Methyl-2-pentanone BRL 8.7 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
Acetone BRL 87 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
Benzene BRL 4.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
Bromodichloromethane BRL 4.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
Bromoform BRL 4.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
Bromomethane BRL 4.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
Carbon disulfide BRL 8.7 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
Carbon tetrachloride BRL 4.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
Chlorobenzene BRL 4.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
Chloroethane BRL 8.7 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
Chloroform BRL 4.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
Chloromethane BRL 8.7 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene BRL 4.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene BRL 4.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
Cydohexane BRL 4.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
Dibromochloromethane BRL 4.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
Dichlorodifluoromethane BRL 8.7 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
Ethylbenzene BRL 4.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
Freon-113 BRL 8.7 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
Isopropylbenzene BRL 4.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
m,p-Xylene BRL 8.7 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
Methyl acetate BRL 4.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
Methyl tert-butyl ether BRL 4.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
Methylcyclohexane BRL 4.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
Methylene chloride BRL 4.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
o-Xylene BRL 4.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
Styrene BRL 4.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
Tetrachloroethene BRL 4.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
Toluene BRL 4.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene BRL 4.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene BRL 4.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
Trichloroethene BRL 4.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
Trichlorofluoromethane BRL 4.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
Vinyl chloride BRL 8.7 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level E Estimated(Value above quantitation range)
BRL Below Reporting Limit S Surrogate Recovery outside accepted recovery limits
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded Narr See Case Narrative
N Analyte not NELAC certified NC Not Confirmed
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank Page 11 of 30

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. Date: 05-Nov-07
CLIENT: Colonial Pipeline Company Client Sample ID: CS-3 @ 5'
Project: CPC-GBJ Lagoon Closure Collection Date: 11/1/2007 10:50:00 AM
Lab ID: 0711095-003 Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Reporting Dilution Units BatchlD Dilution Date Analyzed
Limit Factor
TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS SW8260B (SW5035) Analyst: PV
Surr:4-Bromofluorobenzene 79.1 57.7-127 %REC 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
Surr:Dibromofluoromethane 85.7 61.7-143 %REC 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
Surr:Toluene-d8 101 73-127 %REC 92991 1 11/2/2007 7:42 PM
PERCENT MOISTURE D2216 Analyst: ZA
Percent Moisture 26.1 0 wt% 1 11/2/2007 3:45 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level E Estimated(Value above quantitation range)
BRL Below Reporting Limit S Surrogate Recovery outside accepted recovery limits
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded Narr See Case Narrative
N Analyte not NELAC certified NC Not Confirmed
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank Page 12 of 30

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. Date: 05-Nov-07
CLIENT: Colonial Pipeline Company Client Sample ID: CS-5 @ 4'
Project: CPC-GBJ Lagoon Closure Collection Date: 11/1/2007 11:20:00 AM
Lab ID: 0711095-005 Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Reporting Qual Units BatchID Dilution Date Analyzed
Limit Factor
METALS,TOTAL SW6010B (SW3050B) Analyst: TF
Lead BRL 6.94 mg/Kg-dry 92980 1 11/2/2007 5:59 PM
TCL-SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS SW8270C (SW3550A) Analyst: YH
1,1'-Biphenyl BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol BRL 2500 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
2,4-Dichlorophenol BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
2,4-Dimethylphenol BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
2,4-Dinitrophenol BRL 2500 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
2,4-Dinitrotoluene BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
2,6-Dinitrotoluene BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
2-Chloronaphthalene BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
2-Chlorophenol BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
2-Methylnaphthalene BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
2-Methylphenol BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
2-Nitroaniline BRL 2500 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
2-Nitrophenol BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
3,3"-Dichlorobenzidine BRL 970 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
3-Nitroaniline BRL 2500 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol BRL 2500 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
4-Chioroaniline BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
4-Methylphenol BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
4-Nitroaniline BRL 2500 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
4-Nitrophenol BRL 2500 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
Acenaphthene BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
Acenaphthylene BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
Acetophenone BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
Anthracene BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
Atrazine BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
Benz(a)anthracene BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
Benzaldehyde BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
Benzo(a)pyrene BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
Benzo(b)fluoranthene BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
Benzo(k)fluoranthene BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level E Estimated(Value above quantitation range)
BRL Below Reporting Limit S Surrogate Recovery outside accepted recovery limits
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded Nan See Case Narrative
N Analyte not NELAC certified NC Not Confirmed
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank Page 13 of 30

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. Date: 05-Nov-07
CLIENT: Colonial Pipeline Company Client Sample ID: CS-5 @ 4'
Project: CPC-GBJ Lagoon Closure Collection Date: 11/1/2007 11:20:00 AM
Lab ID: 07 1 1 095-005 Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Reporting Qual Units BatchlD Dilution Date Analyzed
Limit Factor
TCL-SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS SW8270C (SW3550A) Analyst: YH
Butyl benzyl phthalate BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
Caprolactam BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
Carbazole BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
Chrysene BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
Dibenzofuran BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
Diethyl phthalate BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
Dimethyl phthalate BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
Di-n-butyl phthalate BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
Di-n-octyl phthalate BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
Fluoranthene BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
Fluorene BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
Hexachlorobenzene BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
Hexachlorobutadiene BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene BRL 960 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
Hexachloroethane BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
Isophorone BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
Naphthalene BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
Nitrobenzene BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
Pentachlorophenol BRL 2500 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
Phenanthrene BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
Phenol BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
Pyrene BRL 480 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
Surr:2,4,6-Tribromophenol 83.4 46.8-133 %REC 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
Surr:2-Fluorobiphenyl 76.2 51.5-120 %REC 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
Surr:2-Fluorophenol 70.1 34.7-120 %REC 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
Surr:4-Terphenyl-d14 80.9 46.6-121 %REC 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
Surr:Nitrobenzene-d5 73.0 39.2-120 %REC 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
Surr:Phenol-d5 73.1 41.9-120 %REC 92998 1 11/2/2007 8:55 PM
TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS SW8260B (SW5035) Analyst: PV
1,1,1-Trichloroethane BRL 4.6 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane BRL 4.6 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
1,1,2-Trichloroethane BRL 4.6 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
1,1-Dichloroethane BRL 4.6 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
1,1-Dichloroethene BRL 4.6 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene BRL 4.6 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane BRL 4.6 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
1,2-Dibromoethane BRL 4.6 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level E Estimated(Value above quantitation range)
BRL Below Reporting Limit S Surrogate Recovery outside accepted recovery limits
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded Narr See Case Narrative
N Analyte not NELAC certified NC Not Confirmed
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank Page 14 of 30

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. Date: 05-Nov-07
CLIENT: Colonial Pipeline Company Client Sample ID: CS-5 @ 4'
Project: CPC-GBJ Lagoon Closure Collection Date: 11/1/2007 11:20:00 AM
Lab ID: 0711095-005 Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Reporting Qua! Units BatchlD Dilution Date Analyzed
Limit Factor
TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS SW8260B (SW5035) Analyst: PV
1,2-Dichlorobenzene BRL 4.6 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
1,2-Dichloroethane BRL 4.6 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
1,2-Dichloropropane BRL 4.6 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
1,3-Dichlorobenzene BRL 4.6 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
1,4-Dichlorobenzene BRL 4.6 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
2-Butanone BRL 46 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
2-Hexanone BRL 9.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
4-Methyl-2-pentanone BRL 9.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
Acetone BRL 91 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
Benzene BRL 4.6 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
Bromodichloromethane BRL 4.6 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
Bromoform BRL 4.6 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
Bromomethane BRL 4.6 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
Carbon disulfide BRL 9.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
Carbon tetrachloride BRL 4.6 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
Chlorobenzene BRL 4.6 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
Chloroethane BRL 9.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
Chloroform BRL 4.6 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
Chloromethane BRL 9.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene BRL 4.6 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene BRL 4.6 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
Cyclohexane BRL 4.6 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
Dibromochloromethane BRL 4.6 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
Dichlorodifluoromethane BRL 9.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
Ethylbenzene BRL 4.6 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
Freon-113 BRL 9.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
Isopropylbenzene BRL 4.6 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
m,p-Xylene BRL 9.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
Methyl acetate BRL 4.6 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
Methyl tert-butyl ether BRL 4.6 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
Methylcyclohexane BRL 4.6 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
Methylene chloride BRL 4.6 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
o-Xylene BRL 4.6 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
Styrene BRL 4.6 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
Tetrachloroethene BRL 4.6 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
Toluene BRL 4.6 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene BRL 4.6 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene BRL 4.6 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
Trichloroethene BRL 4.6 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
Trichlorofluoromethane BRL 4.6 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
Vinyl chloride BRL 9.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level E Estimated(Value above quantitation range)
BRL Below Reporting Limit S Surrogate Recovery outside accepted recovery limits
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded Narr See Case Narrative
N Analyte not NELAC certified NC Not Confirmed
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank Page 15 of 30

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. Date: 05-Nov-07
CLIENT: Colonial Pipeline Company Client Sample ID: CS-5 @ 4'
Project: CPC-GBJ Lagoon Closure Collection Date: 11/1/2007 11:20:00 AM
Lab ID: 07 1 1 095-005 Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Reporting Qual Units BatcbID Dilution Date Analyzed
Limit Factor
TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS SW8260B (SW5035) Analyst: PV
Surr:4-Bromofluorobenzene 78.4 57.7-127 %REC 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
Surr:Dibromofluoromethane 83.3 61.7-143 %REC 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
Surr:Toluene-d8 94.9 73-127 %REC 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:52 PM
PERCENT MOISTURE D2216 Analyst: ZA
Percent Moisture 31.3 0 wt% 1 11/2/2007 3:45 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level E Estimated(Value above quantitation range)
BRL Below Reporting Limit S Surrogate Recovery outside accepted recovery limits
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded Nan See Case Narrative
N Analyte not NELAC certified NC Not Confirmed
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank Page 16 of 30

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. Date: 05-Nov-07
CLIENT: Colonial Pipeline Company Client Sample ID: CS-6 @ 2'
Project: CPC-GBJ Lagoon Closure Collection Date: 11/1/2007 11:55:00 AM
Lab ID: 0711095-006 Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Reporting Qual Units BatchlD Dilution Date Analyzed
Limit Factor
METALS,TOTAL SW6010B (SW3050B) Analyst: TF
Lead BRL 6.77 mg/Kg-dry 92980 1 11/2/2007 6:02 PM
TCL-SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS SW8270C (SW3550A) Analyst: YH
1,1'-Biphenyl BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol BRL 2300 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
2,4-Dichlorophenol BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
2,4-Dimethylphenol BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
2,4-Dinitrophenol BRL 2300 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
2,4-Dinitrotoluene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
2,6-Dinitrotoluene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
2-Chloronaphthalene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
2-Chlorophenol BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
2-Methylnaphthalene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
2-Methylphenol BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
2-Nitroaniline BRL 2300 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
2-Nitrophenol BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
3,3"-Dichlorobenzidine BRL 920 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
3-Nitroaniline BRL 2300 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol BRL 2300 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
4-Chioroaniline BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
4-Methylphenol BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
4-NiVoaniline BRL 2300 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
4-Nitrophenol BRL 2300 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
Acenaphthene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
Acenaphthylene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
Acetophenone BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
Anthracene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
Atrazine BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
Benz(a)anthracene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
Benzaldehyde BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
Benzo(a)pyrene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
Benzo(b)fluoranthene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
Benzo(k)fluoranthene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level E Estimated(Value above quantitation range)
BRL Below Reporting Limit S Surrogate Recovery outside accepted recovery limits
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded Narr See Case Narrative
N Analyte not NELAC certified NC Not Confirmed
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank Page 17 of 30

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. Date: 05-Nov-07
CLIENT: Colonial Pipeline Company Client Sample ID: CS-6 @ 2'
Project: CPC-GBJ Lagoon Closure Collection Date: 11/1/2007 11:55:00 AM
Lab ID: 07 1 1 095-006 Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Reporting Qual Units BatchlD Dilution Date Analyzed
Limit Factor
TCL-SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS SW8270C (SW3550A) Analyst: YH
Butyl benzyl phthalate BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
Caprolactam BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
Carbazole BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
Chrysene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
Dibenzofuran BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
Diethyl phthalate BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
Dimethyl phthalate BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
Di-n-butyl phthalate BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
Di-n-octyl phthalate BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
Fluoranthene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
Fluorene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
Hexachlorobenzene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
Hexachlorobutadiene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene BRL 910 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
Hexachloroethane BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
Isophorone BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
Naphthalene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
Nitrobenzene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
Pentachlorophenol BRL 2300 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
Phenanthrene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
Phenol BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
Pyrene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
Surr:2,4,6-Tribromophenol 87.5 46.8-133 %REC 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
Surr:2-Fluorobiphenyl 80.2 51.5-120 %REC 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
Surr:2-Fluorophenol 69.8 34.7-120 %REC 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
Surr:4-Terphenyl-d14 85.6 46.6-121 %REC 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
Surr:Nitrobenzene-d5 75.1 39.2-120 %REC 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
Surr:Phenol-d5 75.9 41.9-120 %REC 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:23 PM
TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS SW8260B (SW5035) Analyst: PV
1,1,1-Trichloroethane BRL 4.0 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane BRL 4.0 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
1,1,2-Trichloroethane BRL 4.0 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
1,1-Dichloroethane BRL 4.0 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
1,1-Dichloroethene BRL 4.0 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene BRL 4.0 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane BRL 4.0 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
1,2-Dibromoethane BRL 4.0 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level E Estimated(Value above quantitation range)
BRL Below Reporting Limit S Surrogate Recovery outside accepted recovery limits
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded Narr See Case Narrative
N Analyte not NELAC certified NC Not Confirmed
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank Page 18 of 30

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. Date: 05-Nov-07
CLIENT: Colonial Pipeline Company Client Sample ID: CS-6 @ 2'
Project: CPC-GBJ Lagoon Closure Collection Date: 11/1/2007 11:55:00 AM
Lab ID: 0711095-006 Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Reporting Qual Units BatchlD Dilution Date Analyzed
Limit Factor
TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS SW8260B (SW5035) Analyst: PV
1,2-Dichlorobenzene BRL 4.0 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
1,2-Dichloroethane BRL 4.0 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
1,2-Dichloropropane BRL 4.0 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
1,3-Dichlorobenzene BRL 4.0 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
1,4-Dichiorobenzene BRL 4.0 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
2-Butanone BRL 40 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
2-Hexanone BRL 8.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
4-Methyl-2-pentanone BRL 8.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
Acetone BRL 81 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
Benzene BRL 4.0 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
Bromodichloromethane BRL 4.0 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
Bromoform BRL 4.0 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
Bromomethane BRL 4.0 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
Carbon disulfide BRL 8.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
Carbon tetrachloride BRL 4.0 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
Chlorobenzene BRL 4.0 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
Chloroethane BRL 8.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
Chloroform BRL 4.0 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
Chloromethane BRL 8.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene BRL 4.0 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene BRL 4.0 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
Cyclohexane BRL 4.0 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
Dibromochloromethane BRL 4.0 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
Dichlorodifluoromethane BRL 8.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
Ethylbenzene BRL 4.0 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
Freon-113 BRL 8.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
Isopropylbenzene BRL 4.0 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
m,p-Xylene BRL 8.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
Methyl acetate BRL 4.0 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
Methyl tert-butyl ether BRL 4.0 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
Methylcyclohexane BRL 4.0 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
Methylene chloride BRL 4.0 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
o-Xylene BRL 4.0 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
Styrene BRL 4.0 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
Tetrachloroethene BRL 4.0 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
Toluene BRL 4.0 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene BRL 4.0 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene BRL 4.0 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
Trichloroethene BRL 4.0 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
Trichlorofluoromethane BRL 4.0 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
Vinyl chloride BRL 8.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
Qualifiers: ' Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level E Estimated(Value above quantitation range)
BRL Below Reporting Limit S Surrogate Recovery outside accepted recovery limits
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded Nan See Case Narrative
N Analyte not NELAC certified NC Not Confirmed
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank Page 19 of 30

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. Date: 05-Nov-07
CLIENT: Colonial Pipeline Company Client Sample ID: CS-6 @ 2'
Project: CPC-GBJ Lagoon Closure Collection Date: 11/1/2007 11:55:00 AM
Lab ID: 0711095-006 Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Reporting Qual Units BatchlD Dilution Date Analyzed
Limit Factor
TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS SW8260B (SW5035) Analyst: PV
Surr:4-Bromofluorobenzene 77.8 57.7-127 %REC 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
Surr:Dibromofluoromethane 79.1 61.7-143 %REC 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
Surr:Toluene-d8 93.1 73-127 %REC 92991 1 11/2/2007 2:24 PM
PERCENT MOISTURE D2216 Analyst: ZA
Percent Moisture 27.4 0 wt% 1 11/2/2007 3:45 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level E Estimated(Value above quantitation range)
BRL Below Reporting Limit S Surrogate Recovery outside accepted recovery limits
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded Narr See Case Narrative
N Analyte not NELAC certified NC Not Confirmed
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank Page 20 of 30

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. Date: 05-Nov-07
CLIENT: Colonial Pipeline Company Client Sample ID: CS-7 @ 2'
Project: CPC-GBJ Lagoon Closure Collection Date: 11/1/2007 11:40:00 AM
Lab ID: 0711095-007 Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Reporting Qual Units BatchlD Dilution Date Analyzed
Limit Factor
METALS,TOTAL SW6010B (SW3050B) Analyst: TF
Lead BRL 5.61 mg/Kg-dry 92980 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
TCL-SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS SW8270C (SW3550A) Analyst: YH
1,1'-Biphenyl BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol BRL 2400 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
2,4-Dichlorophenol BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
2,4-Dimethylphenol BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
2,4-Dinitrophenol BRL 2400 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
2,4-Dinitrotoluene BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
2,6-Dinitrotoluene BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
2-Chloronaphthalene BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
2-Chlorophenol BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
2-Methylnaphthalene BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
2-Methylphenol BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
2-Nitroaniline BRL 2400 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
2-Nitrophenol BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine BRL 930 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
3-Nitroaniline BRL 2400 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol BRL 2400 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
4-Chloroaniline BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
4-Methylphenol BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
4-Nitroaniline BRL 2400 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
4-Nitrophenol BRL 2400 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
Acenaphthene BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
Acenaphthylene BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
Acetophenone BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
Anthracene BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
Atrazine BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
Benz(a)anthracene BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
Benzaldehyde BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
Benzo(a)pyrene BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
Benzo(b)fluoranthene BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
Benzo(k)fluoranthene BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/20076:05 PM
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/20076:05 PM
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level E Estimated(Value above quantitation range)
BRL Below Reporting Limit S Surrogate Recovery outside accepted recovery limits
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded Nan See Case Narrative
N Analyte not NELAC certified NC Not Confirmed
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank Page 21 of 30

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. Date: 05-Nov-07
CLIENT: Colonial Pipeline Company Client Sample ID: CS-7 @ 2'
Project: CPC-GBJ Lagoon Closure Collection Date: 11/1/2007 11:40:00 AM
Lab ID: 0711095-007 Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Reporting Qual Units BatchlD Dilution Date Analyzed
Limit Factor
TCL-SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS SW8270C (SW3550A) Analyst: YH
Butyl benzyl phthalate BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
Caprolactam BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
Carbazole BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
Chrysene BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
Dibenzofuran BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
Diethyl phthalate BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
Dimethyl phthalate BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
Di-n-butyl phthalate BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
Di-n-octyl phthalate BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
Fluoranthene BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
Fluorene BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
Hexachlorobenzene BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
Hexachlorobutadiene BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene BRL 920 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
Hexachloroethane BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
Isophorone BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
Naphthalene BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
Nitrobenzene BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
Pentachlorophenol BRL 2400 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
Phenanthrene BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
Phenol BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
Pyrene BRL 460 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
Surr:2,4,6-Tribromophenol 86.3 46.8-133 %REC 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
Surr:2-Fluorobiphenyl 79.5 51.5-120 %REC 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
Surr:2-Fluorophenol 69.8 34.7-120 %REC 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
Surr:4-Terphenyl-d14 84.7 46.6-121 %REC 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
Surr:Nitrobenzene-d5 74.0 39.2-120 %REC 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
Surr:Phenol-d5 74.0 41.9-120 %REC 92998 1 11/2/2007 6:05 PM
TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS SW8260B (SW5035) Analyst: PV
1,1,1-Trichloroethane BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
1,1,2-Trichloroethane BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
1,1-Dichloroethane BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
1,1-Dichloroethene BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
1,2-Dibromoethane BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level E Estimated(Value above quantitation range)
BRL Below Reporting Limit S Surrogate Recovery outside accepted recovery limits
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded Nan See Case Narrative
N Analyte not NELAC certified NC Not Confirmed
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank Page 22 of 30

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. Date: 05-Nov-07
CLIENT: Colonial Pipeline Company Client Sample ID: CS-7 @ 2'
Project: CPC-GBJ Lagoon Closure Collection Date: 11/1/2007 11:40:00 AM
Lab ID: 0711095-007 Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Reporting Qual Units BatchlD Dilution Date Analyzed
Limit Factor
TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS SW8260B (SW5035) Analyst: PV
1,2-Dichlorobenzene BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
1,2-Dichloroethane BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
1,2-Dichloropropane BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
1,3-Dichlorobenzene BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
1,4-Dichlorobenzene BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
2-Butanone BRL 41 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
2-Hexanone BRL 8.2 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
4-Methyl-2-pentanone BRL 8.2 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
Acetone BRL 82 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
Benzene BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
Bromodichloromethane BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
Bromoform BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
Bromomethane BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
Carbon disulfide BRL 8.2 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
Carbon tetrachloride BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
Chlorobenzene BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
Chloroethane BRL 8.2 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
Chloroform BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
Chloromethane BRL 8.2 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
Cyclohexane BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
Dibromochloromethane BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
Dichlorodifluoromethane BRL 8.2 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
Ethylbenzene BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
Freon-113 BRL 8.2 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
Isopropylbenzene BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
m,p-Xylene BRL 8.2 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
Methyl acetate BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
Methyl tert-butyl ether BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
Methylcyclohexane BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
Methylene chloride BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
o-Xylene BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
Styrene BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
Tetrachloroethene BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
Toluene BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
Trichloroethene BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
Trichlorofluoromethane BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
Vinyl chloride BRL 8.2 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level E Estimated(Value above quantitation range)
BRL Below Reporting Limit S Surrogate Recovery outside accepted recovery limits
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded Narr See Case Narrative
N Analyte not NELAC certified NC Not Confirmed
B Analyte detected in the acsoriated Method Blank Page 23 of 30

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. Date: 05-Nov-07
CLIENT: Colonial Pipeline Company Client Sample ID: CS-7 @ 2'
Project: CPC-GBJ Lagoon Closure Collection Date: 11/1/2007 11:40:00 AM
Lab ID: 0711095-007 Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Reporting Qual Units BatchlD Dilution Date Analyzed
Limit Factor
TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS SW8260B (SW5035) Analyst: PV
Surr:4-Bromofluorobenzene 77.6 57.7-127 %REC 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
Surr:Dibromofluoromethane 82.9 61.7-143 %REC 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
Surr:Toluene-d8 96.1 73-127 %REC 92991 1 11/2/2007 8:39 PM
PERCENT MOISTURE D2216 Analyst: ZA
Percent Moisture 28.1 0 wt% 1 11/2/2007 3:45 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level E Estimated(Value above quantitation range)
BRL Below Reporting Limit S Surrogate Recovery outside accepted recovery limits
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded Narr See Case Narrative
N Analyte not NELAC certified NC Not Confirmed
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank Page 24 of 30

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. Date: 05-Nov-07
CLIENT: Colonial Pipeline Company Client Sample ID: CS-8 @ 2'
Project: CPC-GBJ Lagoon Closure Collection Date: 11/1/2007 1.1:45:00 AM
Lab ID: 0711095-008 Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Reporting Qual Units BatchlD Dilution Date Analyzed
Limit Factor
METALS,TOTAL SW6010B (SW3050B) Analyst: TF
Lead BRL 6.39 mg/Kg-dry 92980 1 11/2/2007 6:08 PM
TCL-SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS SW8270C (SW3550A) Analyst: YH
1,1'-Biphenyl BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol BRL 2300 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
2,4-Dichlorophenol BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
2,4-Dimethylphenol BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
2,4-Dinitrophenol BRL 2300 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
2,4-Dinitrotoluene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
2,6-Dinitrotoluene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
2-Chloronaphthalene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
2-Chlorophenol BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
2-Methylnaphthalene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
2-Methylphenol BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
2-Nitroaniline BRL 2300 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
2-Nitrophenol BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
3,3"-Dichlorobenzidine BRL 910 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
3-Nitroaniline BRL 2300 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol BRL 2300 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
4-Bromophenyl phenyl ether BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
4-Chloroaniline BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
4-Chlorophenyl phenyl ether BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
4-Methylphenol BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
4-Nitroaniline BRL 2300 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
4-Nitrophenol BRL 2300 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
Acenaphthene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
Acenaphthylene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
Acetophenone BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
Anthracene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
Atrazine BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
Benz(a)anthracene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
Benzaldehyde BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
Benzo(a)pyrene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
Benzo(b)fluoranthene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
Benzo(g,h,i)perylene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
Benzo(k)fluoranthene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
Bis(2-chloroethoxy)methane BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
Bis(2-chloroisopropyl)ether BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
Qualifiers: ' Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level E Estimated(Value above quantitation range)
BRL Below Reporting Limit S Surrogate Recovery outside accepted recovery limits
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded Narr See Case Narrative
N Analyte not NELAC certified NC Not Confmned
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank Page 25 of 30

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. Date: 05-Nov-07
CLIENT: Colonial Pipeline Company Client Sample ID: CS-8 @ 2'
Project: CPC-GBJ Lagoon Closure Collection Date: 11/1/2007 11:45:00 AM
Lab ID: 0711095-008 Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Reporting Qual Units BatchlD Dilution Date Analyzed
Limit Factor
TCL-SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS SW8270C (SW3550A) Analyst: YH
Butyl benzyl phthalate BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
Caprolactam BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
Carbazole BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
Chrysene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
Dibenzofuran BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
Diethyl phthalate BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
Dimethyl phthalate BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
Di-n-butyl phthalate BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
Di-n-octyl phthalate BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
Fluoranthene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
Fluorene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
Hexachlorobenzene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
Hexachlorobutadiene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene BRL 900 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
Hexachloroethane BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
Isophorone BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
Naphthalene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
Nitrobenzene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
N-Nitrosodi-n-propylamine BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
Pentachlorophenol BRL 2300 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
Phenanthrene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
Phenol BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
Pyrene BRL 450 pg/Kg-dry 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
Surr:2,4,6-Tribromophenol 78.6 46.8-133 %REC 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
Surr:2-Fluorobiphenyl 71.3 51.5-120 %REC 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
Surr:2-Fluorophenol 61.7 34.7-120 %REC 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
Surr:4-Terphenyl-d14 77.6 46.6-121 %REC 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
Surr:Nitrobenzene-d5 67.1 39.2-120 %REC 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
Surr:Phenol-d5 66.6 41.9-120 %REC 92998 1 11/2/2007 9:51 PM
TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS SW8260B (SW5035) Analyst: PV
1,1,1-Trichloroethane BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
1,1,2-Trichloroethane BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
1,1-Dichloroethane BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
1,1-Dichloroethene BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
1,2-Dibromoethane BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level E Estimated(Value above quantitation range)
BRL Below Reporting Limit S Surrogate Recovery outside accepted recovery limits
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded Narr See Case Narrative
N Analyte not NELAC certified NC Not Confirmed
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank Page 26 of 30

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. Date: 05-Nov-07
CLIENT: Colonial Pipeline Company Client Sample ID: CS-8 @ 2'
Project: CPC-GBJ Lagoon Closure Collection Date: 11/1/2007 11:45:00 AM
Lab ID: 07 1 1 095-008 Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Reporting Qual Units BatchlD Dilution Date Analyzed
Limit Factor
TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS SW8260B (SW5035) Analyst: PV
1,2-Dichlorobenzene BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
1,2-Dichloroethane BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
1,2-Dichloropropane BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
1,3-Dichlorobenzene BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
1,4-Dichlorobenzene BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
2-Butanone BRL 41 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
2-Hexanone BRL 8.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
4-Methyl-2-pentanone BRL 8.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
Acetone BRL 83 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
Benzene BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
Bromodichloromethane BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
Bromoform BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
Bromomethane BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
Carbon disulfide BRL 8.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
Carbon tetrachloride BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
Chlorobenzene BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
Chloroethane BRL 8.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
Chloroform BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
Chloromethane BRL 8.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
Cyclohexane BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
Dibromochloromethane BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
Dichlorodifluoromethane BRL 8.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
Ethylbenzene BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
Freon-113 BRL 8.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
lsopropylbenzene BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
m,p-Xylene BRL 8.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
Methyl acetate BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
Methyl tert-butyl ether BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
Methylcyclohexane BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
Methylene chloride BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
o-Xylene BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
Styrene BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
Tetrachloroethene BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
Toluene BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
Trichloroethene BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
Trichlorofluoromethane BRL 4.1 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
Vinyl chloride BRL 8.3 pg/Kg-dry 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level E Estimated(Value above quantitation range)
BRL Below Reporting Limit S Surrogate Recovery outside accepted recovery limits
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded Narr See Case Narrative
N Analyte not NELAC certified NC Not Confirmed
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank Page 27 of 30

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. Date: 05-Nov-07
CLIENT: Colonial Pipeline Company Client Sample ID: CS-8 @ 2'
Project: CPC-GBJ Lagoon Closure Collection Date: 11/1/2007 11:45:00 AM
Lab ID: 0711095-008 Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Reporting Qual Units BatchID Dilution Date Analyzed
Limit Factor
TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS SW8260B (SW5035) Analyst: PV
Surr:4-Bromofluorobenzene 71.6 57.7-127 %REC 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
Surr:Dibromofluoromethane 78.3 61.7-143 %REC 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
Sum Toluene-d8 95.5 73-127 %REC 92991 1 11/2/2007 1:55 PM
PERCENT MOISTURE D2216 Analyst: ZA
Percent Moisture 26.7 0 wt% 1 11/2/2007 5:00 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level E Estimated(Value above quantitation range)
BRL Below Reporting Limit S Surrogate Recovery outside accepted recovery limits
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded Nan See Case Narrative
N Analyte not NELAC certified NC Not Confirmed
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank Page 28 of 30

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. Date: 05-Nov-07
CLIENT: Colonial Pipeline Company Client Sample ID: TRIP BLANK
Project: CPC-GBJ Lagoon Closure Collection Date: 11/2/2007
Lab ID: 0711095-009 Matrix: AQUEOUS
Analyses Result Reporting Qual Units BatchlD Dilution Date Analyzed
Limit Factor
TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS SW8260B (SW5030B) Analyst: PV
1,1,1-Trichloroethane BRL 5.0 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane BRL 5.0 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
1,1,2-Trichloroethane BRL 5.0 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
1,1-Dichloroethane BRL 5.0 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
1,1-Dichloroethene BRL 5.0 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene BRL 5.0 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane BRL 5.0 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
1,2-Dibromoethane BRL 5.0 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
1,2-Dichlorobenzene BRL 5.0 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
1,2-Dichloroethane BRL 5.0 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
1,2-Dichloropropane BRL 5.0 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
1,3-Dichlorobenzene BRL 5.0 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
1,4-Dichlorobenzene BRL 5.0 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
2-Butanone BRL 50 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
2-Hexanone BRL 10 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
4-Methyl-2-pentanone BRL 10 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
Acetone BRL 50 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
Benzene BRL 5.0 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
Bromodichloromethane BRL 5.0 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
Bromoform BRL 5.0 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
Bromomethane BRL 5.0 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
Carbon disulfide BRL 5.0 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
Carbon tetrachloride BRL 5.0 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
Chlorobenzene BRL 5.0 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
Chloroethane BRL 10 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
Chloroform BRL 5.0 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
Chloromethane BRL 10 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene BRL 5.0 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene BRL 5.0 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
Cyclohexane BRL 5.0 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
Dibromochloromethane BRL 5.0 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
Dichlorodifluoromethane BRL 10 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
Ethylbenzene BRL 5.0 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
Freon-113 BRL 10 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
Isopropylbenzene BRL 5.0 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
m,p-Xylene BRL 10 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
Methyl acetate BRL 5.0 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
Methyl tert-butyl ether BRL 5.0 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
Methylcyclohexane BRL 5.0 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
Methylene chloride BRL 5.0 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
o-Xylene BRL 5.0 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level E Estimated(Value above quantitation range)
BRL Below Reporting Limit S Surrogate Recovery outside accepted recovery limits
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded Narr See Case Narrative
N Analyte not NELAC certified NC Not Confirmed
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank Page 29 of 30

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. Date: 05-Nov-07
CLIENT: Colonial Pipeline Company Client Sample ID: TRIP BLANK
Project: CPC-GBJ Lagoon Closure Collection Date: 11/2/2007
Lab ID: 0711095-009 Matrix: AQUEOUS
Analyses Result Reporting Qual Units BatchlD Dilution Date Analyzed
Limit Factor
TCL VOLATILE ORGANICS SW8260B (SW5030B) Analyst: PV
Styrene BRL 5.0 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
Tetrachloroethene BRL 5.0 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
Toluene BRL 5.0 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene BRL 5.0 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene BRL 5.0 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
Trichloroethene BRL 5.0 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
Trichlorofluoromethane BRL 5.0 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
Vinyl chloride BRL 2.0 pg/L 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
Surr:4-Bromofluorobenzene 77.2 63.1-120 %REC 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
Surr:Dibromofluoromethane 83.4 73.8-118 %REC 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
Sum Toluene-d8 84.7 75.1-120 %REC 93033 1 11/3/2007 5:03 AM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level E Estimated(Value above quantitation range)
BRL Below Reporting Limit S Surrogate Recovery outside accepted recovery limits
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded Nan See Case Narrative
N Analyte not NELAC certified NC Not Confirmed
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank Page 30 of 30

APPENDIX C
LAND APPLICATION PERMIT

a
OF W A rt."? Michael F.Easley,Governor
Q William G.Ross Jr.,Secretary
:1 y North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
O I�il.,� 1 Alan W.Klimek,P.E.,Director
'ONDivision of Water Quality
JULY 18,2003
MR.TOM J.GUZIKOWSKI,GENERAL MANAGER-OPERATIONS
COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANY
411 GALLIMORE DAIRY ROAD
GREENSBORO,NC 27409
Subject: Permit No.WQ0005809
Colonial Pipeline Company
Greensboro,NC Terminal Residuals Land
Application Program(D)
Land Application of Residual Solids(503 Exempt)
Guilford County
Dear Mr.Guzikowski:
In accordance with your permit renewal application package received on January 15,2003 as well
as the additional information received on March 10, 2003, March 13, 2003 and June 4, 2003; we are
forwarding herewith a renewed Permit No. WQ0005809, dated July 18, 2003, to Colonial Pipeline
Company for the subject residuals land application program.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance untkiiiii1011001611 void Permit No.
WQ0005809, issued on July 9, 1998; and shall be subject to the conditions and limitations as specified
therein. Make note of this permit's expiration date and the fact that a permit renewal application is due to
the Division of Water Quality(Division)no later than six months prior to that date(i.e.,see Condition VI.
7.),as the Division does not send reminders to apply for permit renewal.
This permit approves the continued operation of the residuals land application program for
another five-year cycle. As always, remember to take the time to review this permit thoroughly, as
some of the conditions contained therein may have been added, changed, or deleted since the last
issuance. Pay particular attention to the monitoring requirements in this permit. Failure to establish an
adequate system for collecting and maintaining the required operational information will result in future
compliance problems. Pay particular attention to the new conditions,Condition D.12 and Condition 11.27.
If any parts, requirements, and/or limitations contained in this permit are unacceptable, you have
the right to request an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within 30 days following receipt of this
permit. This request shall be in the from of a written petition,conforming to Chapter 150B of the North
Carolina General Statutes and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings at 6714 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714. Unless such demands are made, this permit shall be final
and binding.
Non-Discharge Permitting Unit Internet httpf/h2o.erv.state.nc.ushrdpu
1817 Mall Service Center,Raleigh,NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
DENR Customer Service Center Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer 50%recycled/10%post-consumer paper

•
If you need any additional information concerning this matter,please contact Mr. Duane Leith by
telephone at(919)733-5083,extension 370,or via e-mail at duane.leith@nc l.net.
Sin
,for Alan W.Klimek,P.E.
cc: Guilford County Health Department
Winston-Salem Regional Office-Water Quality Section
Winston-Salem Regional Office-Groundwater Section
Central Office-Groundwater Section
Technical Assistance and Certification Unit
Water Quality Central Files
NDPU Files
NDPU Residuals Program Coordinator
2

44, NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
RALEIGH
LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUAL SOLIDS(503 EXEMPT)PERMIT
In accordance with the provisions of Article 21 of Chapter 143,General Statutes of North Carolina as
amended,and other applicable Laws,Rules,and Regulations
PERMISSION IS HEREBY GRANTED TO
Colonial Pipeline Company
Guilford County
FOR THE
continued operation of a residuals land application program consisting of the application of residuals
generated by the residuals source-generating facilities listed in the most recently-certified Attachment A to
the land application sites listed in the most recently-certified Attachment B with no discharge of wastes to
/ k surface waters,pursuant to the permit renewal application package received on January 15,2003 as well as
the additional information received on March 10, 2003, March 13, 2003 and June 4, 2003 and in
conformity with the project plan,specifications,and other supporting data subsequently filed and approved
by the Department of Environment and Natural Resources and considered a part of this permit.
This permit shall be effective from the date of issuance until June 30, 2008; shall void Permit No.
WQ0005809, issued on July 9, 1998; and shall be subject to the following specified conditions and
limitations:
I. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
1. The residuals land application program shall be effectively maintained and operated as a non-
discharge system to prevent the discharge of any wastes resulting from the operation of this
Program
2. This permit shall become voidable if the soils of the land application sites fail to assimilate the
residuals adequately and may be rescinded unless the land application sites are maintained and
operated in a manner that will protect the assigned water quality standards of the surface
waters and groundwater.
3. The issuance of this permit shall not relieve the Permittee of the responsibility for damages to
surface waters or groundwater resulting from the operation of this residuals land application
program.
1

4. In the event that the residuals land application program is not operated satisfactorily,including
the creation of nuisance conditions, the Permittee shall cease land applying residuals to the
site, contact the Water Quality Section of the appropriate Division of Water Quality's
(Division) regional office, and take any immediate corrective actions as may be required by
the Division.
5. Only the land application sites listed in the most recently-certified Attachment B of this permit
are approved for residuals land application.
II. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS
1. The facilities and land application sites shall be properly maintained and operated at all times.
2. Upon classification of the residuals land application program by the Water Pollution Control
System Operators Certification Commission (WPCSOCC), the Pennittee shall designate a
certified land application/residuals operator to be in responsible charge(ORC)of the program.
The operator shall hold a certificate of the type classification assigned to the program by the
WPCSOCC. The Permittee shall also designate a certified back-up operator of the appropriate
type to comply with the conditions of 15A NCAC 8G.0202.
3. No residuals shall be stored at any land application site at any time, unless written approval
has first been requested and obtained from the Division.
4. A copy of this permit shall be maintained in all manned equipment at the land application sites
when residuals are being land applied during the life of this permit. A spill prevention and
control plan shall be maintained in all residuals transport and application vehicles.
5. When land applying residuals to any land application site, the following buffer zones shall be
maintained at all times:
a. 400 feet from residences or places of public assembly under separate ownership for
surface application methods; however, the buffer zone requirement may be reduced to a
minimum of 100 feet upon written consent of the owner and approval from the Water
Quality Section of the Winston-Salem Regional Office;
b. 200 feet from residences or places of public assembly under separate ownership for
subsurface application methods; however, the buffer zone requirement may be reduced to
a minimum of 100 feet upon written consent of the owner and approval from the Water
Quality Section of the Winston-Salem Regional Office;
c. 100 feet from any public or private water supply source, waters classified as SA or SB,
and any Class I or Class II impounded reservoir used as a source of drinking water for
both methods;
d. 100 feet from any streams classified as WS or B,any other stream,canal,marsh or coastal
waters and any other lake or impoundment for surface application;
e. 50 feet from any streams classified as WS or B, any other stream, canal, marsh or coastal
waters and any other lake or impoundment for subsurface application;
f. 50 feet from property lines for both surface and subsurface application methods;
g. 50 feet from public right of ways for both surface and subsurface application methods;
2

•airs agi 03 middy pusI aq
Hugs sp ruptsac'saoptpps ou amp`pepaaaxa l0 law aq auu 8atpsoi Ndd uanmtxsar atp wogs
'Pagdde NPdd 3o saamos aqi Jo us Aq papaaoxa aq 3ou usgs ('£i 'II U0p!PUOO aas '•a•t)don
pagt3ads ay3 io; a3xi Swum (NYd) ua80r3tu aigsltsnB mid aq3 3gg3 goes ails alp 03 pagdds
Pusi aq hear 38111 slsnptsar Jo aumt0A 0113 21114112A 10; alq[suodsai aq 'Tugs aa3ituuad ag,L •I
•uotls3gdds mauapuatus'tos;o a3ei pus
parano3 sags ag3;o Rpm) sapnl3at nip 3113A3 Suuo3tu0oa goes;o spiooai mum ute)atetu
Begs pus CISutpo33s suopspuatuuro3ai gone Iuatualdun pegs aa33trurad aq,I, •quAo li doio
03 aApnpuoo suoptpuo3 8atute1atatu pas sistqusaa;o aot1s3i'dds post io;(3tltgsltns;o suum
ut aUs egi;o A1v2a3ui ago Satucs2a!saa so;urstueg3atu aAperotlatus aa;3o s0(•330'wmsM,'1•a)
s3uacupuaurs itos Stgpis8ai su0pepuauacuo3ai 991etu pus sllnsai aq3 Ma1Aai 'Isgs 3sttnoutu2s
Jaw i0 1sp110ps 110S pasuaog-satloas0 quoN s 'aownS uot)IAsasuo3 aamosag 1111111814
ago 'sa3tAIaS 3aumsuo3 pus am3lnot.dy ;o 3aaui3isda( ago 'amp uotsua3xg anpsradoo0
pool at',', •sa3js uogsogdds pus! mP 30 il$ so paropuoiu aq Begs 'wand gip Aq pannbar
ss stsr(leus s'tos lamas atp moil sprat ago 8tnsn 'uoISIA!Q alp Aq pano.1dde ss potpaur
tattoo.10(dSW) a2s3ua3.1ad umipos a'gea2usg3x2 ag3'(rag2tg i0 3Ag Jo(ems)opal uopdrospe •
umtp0s g2nl '•a•t) 3ua1no3 3lss g8tq s ut83aoa mid& pass aq a3 s'snPISar alp Jo etas PlnogS •0i
•adiC3 jtos aq)pas don pagpads
ago so; Palms 3saq Hd ago uo uotisuuo;ut apinoid digs 3s11uouo138 age '£i 'Q qoPTImoD
ut pagpads sdoa3 ago 103 Nap( mntupdo amsua of pagdds pas' ars sisnptsar g3n'M o)ao
salts uopsogdds pas'IIB uo 10.9 ascii lama'Itos ago p paut83utsaz aq usgs Hd a'gs3da-os try •6
000`t OOS OSZ . aug
OOS OSZ SZI ImiotN
000`Z 000'I OOS P�'I
00S OSZ SZi radcloo
81 6 S'b umlluPv0
(a rav.sad spunod) (awry v!ad spunod) (arm lad spunod)
SI<saga gum SI 01 S s0a3 S>s333 qw mamma
ons s aol 2PPI 816 B aol wr i a34S s s0J 2m
:bao)sappsds3 a2usg3xa uope3 Itos Sucpaodsauo3 ay3 w;Sau+solio;ag3 paaoxa Sou gigs
ails uop13gdde pus! i(as uo sates s2u1181o1 's3aul dCAsag;o (sue) $3111 Sutpsol at WI agi '8
•3u3A2 uOpV3t'dds pus'slenptsai s Sutmp pas o1 iotsd a3cs uops3gdds
past gotta uo 112111811 )(imp aq ilegs sauspunoq sacs aoi38otldds Past slsUPcsar 3r.Jpads L
•spoglaut uopsogdde aosjrnsgns io;Iua3rad SI pus spotpauu
aot3s3gdds a3VJ1ns Jo.; Iuaarad 0i aq !lugs sisnPisar;o uops3gdds pus' 30; adois amuatl/ow •9
•spog[atu
uopsotldds aospnsgns pus a3s;Ins tpoq ao; sago3ip a2supup a3s;lns pus 'sura2s4Cs
a2stnssp ia3ampuno 8'suotssantp 1a3PM a3e;.uts 'sump io)daara3at ado'suMop uwJJ I203 SZ 't
pus:spotpaua uops3gdds a3s}msgns
PI A3e;ltts Tog io; suots.rancp sa1PA► 23e1111s pus sump lo1da31a2ur adotsdn wog ran Oi 'q

OWN 12. A suitable vegetative cover shall be maintained on land application sites onto which residuals
are land applied in accordance with the crop management plan outlined by the local
Cooperative Extension Office, the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, the
Natural Resource Conservation Service,or other agronomist and as approved by the Division.
13. Residuals and other sources of PAN shall be land applied to all land application sites at
agronomic rates in accordance with the crop management plan outlined by the local
Cooperative Extension Office, the North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer
Services, the Natural Resource Conservation Service, or other agronomist. Under no
circumstances shall the following PAN loading rates land applied to any site exceed the
following for the specified crops:
PAN PAN
Crop (pounds per Crop (pounds per
acre per year) acre per year)
Forest
Alfalfa 200 (Hardwood or Softwood) 75
Bermuda Grass 220 Milo 100
(Hay or Pasture)
Small Grain
Blue Grass 120 (Wheat,Barley,or Oats) 100
Corn 160 Sorghum or Sudex 1
80
(Grain) (Pasture)
Corn 200 Sorghum or Sudex 220
(Silage) (Silage)
Cotton 70 Soybeans 200
Fescue 250 Timothy,Orchard,or 200
Rye Grasses
The Permittee shall apply for and receive a modification of this permit before land applying
residuals on any land application site that is to be established in a crop other than those listed
above. A maximum PAN loading rate for the desired crop shall be approved with the permit
modification.
If the land application sites are to be overseeded(e.g., bermuda grass in the summer and rye
grass in the winter with BOTH crops to receive residuals),then the second crop shall receive
an application of PAN at a rate of no greater than 50 pounds per acre per year. This practice
shall be allowed as long as the second crop is to be harvested. If the second crop is to be
planted for erosion control only and is to be tilled into the soil,then no residuals shall be land
applied to these sites because the PAN will essentially be returned to the soil.
Residuals shall not be land applied at rates greater than agronomic rates,unless authorized by
the Division.
14. Animals shall not be grazed on any land application site for 30 days after any residuals land
application event. Sites that are to be used for grazing shall have fencing that will be used to
prevent access after each event.
15. Food crops,feed crops,and fiber crops that do not come in contact with the residuals shall not
be harvested for 30 days after any residuals land application event.
4

•
16. Food crops with harvested parts that touch the residual/soil mixture and are totally above the
land surface (e.g., tobacco, melons, cucumbers, squash, etc.) shall not be harvested for 14
months after any residuals land application event.
17. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land (i.e., root crops such as
potatoes,carrots,radishes, etc.) shall not be harvested for 20 months after any residuals land
application event when the residuals remain on the land surface for four months or longer
prior to incorporation into the soil.
18. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested for 38
months after any residuals land application event when the residuals remain on the land
surface for less than four months prior to incorporation into the soil.
19. Turf shall not be harvested for one year after any residuals land application event.
20. Adequate provisions shall be taken to prevent wind erosion and surface runoff from conveying
residuals from the land application sites onto adjacent properties or into any surface waters.
Disking, seeding and other tillage operations on the land application sites shall be performed
following the land contours to aid in controlling channeling of storm water.
21. Adequate procedures shall be provided to prevent surface runoff from carrying any land
applied or stored residuals into any surface waters.
22. Surface-applied residuals shall be plowed or disced within 24 hours after land application on
land application sites with no cover crop established.
23. For land application sites that are prone to flooding or within the 100-year flood elevation,
residuals shall be land applied only during periods of dry weather. The residuals shall be
incorporated into the soil within 24 hours after land application.
24. Residuals shall not be land applied during inclement weather or until 24 hours following a
rainfall event of 0.5-inch or greater in 24 hours. Any emergency residuals land application
measures shall first be approved in writing by the Division.
25. Residuals shall not be land applied to any land application site that is flooded, frozen, or
snow-covered.
26. Appropriate measures shall be taken to control public access to the land application sites
during active site use and for the 12-month period following the last residuals land application
event. Such controls may include the posting of signs indicating the activities being
conducted at each site.
27. Coarse rock fragments, large or numerous enough to interfere with tillage operations or the
establishment of a suitable vegetative cover, shall be prevented from entering the residuals,
shall be removed from the residuals prior to land application and/or shall be removed from the
land surface during the application and tillage process.
5

•
PIN
III. MONITORING AND REPOgTING REQUIREMENTS
1. Any monitoring (i.e., including groundwater, surface water, residuals, soil, or plant tissue
analyses)deemed necessary by the Division to ensure protection of the environment shall be
established,and an acceptable sampling and reporting schedule shall be followed.
2. Residuals to be land applied shall be analyzed to demonstrate that they are non-hazardous
under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA). A conosivity, ignitability,and
reactivity analysis as well as a Toxicity Characteristics Leaching Procedure (TCLP) analysis
shall be conducted on residuals to be land applied. The analyses shall be performed at the
frequency specified in the most recently-certified Attachment A of this permit,and the results
shall be maintained on file by the Permittee for a minimum of five years. If residuals
generated by a particular residuals source-generating facility are land applied at a frequency
less than that which is specified in the most recently-certified Attachment A of this permit,the
analyses shall be required for each residuals land application event. Only residuals that are
generated by the residuals source-generating facilities that are identified as being exempt from
this condition in the most recently-certified Attachment A of this permit shall not be required
to comply with this monitoring requirement.
,�, .....w c ;y;Fre.
Arsenic(5.0) 1,4-Dichlorobenzene(7.5) Nitrobenzene(2.0)
Barium(100.0) 1,2-Dichloroethane(0.5) Pentachlorophenol(100.0)
Benzene(0.5) 1,1-Dichloroethylene(0.7) Pyridine(5.0)
Cadmium(1.0) 2,4-Dinitrotoluene(0.13) Selenium(1.0)
Carbon tetrachloride(0.5) Endrin(0.02) Silver(5.0)
Chlordane(0.03) Hexachlorobenzene(0.13) Tetrachloroethylene(0.7)
Chlorobenzene(100.0) Heptachlor(sod hi hydride)(0.00g) Toxaphene(0.5)
Chloroform(6.0) Hexachloro-1,3-butadiene(0.5) Trichiaroethylene(0.5)
Chromium(5.0) Hexachloroethane(3.0) 2,4,5-Trichlorophenol(400.0)
m-Cresol(200.0) Lead(5.0) 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol(2.0)
o-Cresol(200.0) Lindane(0.4) 2,4,5-TP(Silvex)(1.0)
p-Cresol(200.0) Mercury(0.2) Vinyl chloride(0.2)
Cresol(200.0) Methoxychlor(10.0)
2,4-D(10.0) Methyl ethyl ketone(200.0)
After the residuals have been monitored as specified above for two years at an annual
frequency or greater, the Permittee may submit a request to the Division for a permit
modification to request a reduction of this monitoring requirement In no case,however,shall
the frequency of monitoring be less than once per permit cycle.
6

•
3. An analysis shall be conducted on residuals generated by each residuals source-generating
facility listed in the most recently-certified Attachment A of this permit. The analysis shall be
performed at the frequency specified in the most recently-certified Attachment A of this
permit, and the results shall be maintained on file by the Pern ittee for a minimum of five
years. If residuals generated by a particular residuals source-generating facility are land
applied at a frequency less than that which is specified in the most recently-certified
Attachment A of this permit,an analysis shall be required for each residuals land application
event. The analysis shall include, but shall not necessarily be limited to, the following
parameters: _ _.
• �I
•
After the residuals generated by a particular residuals source-generating operation have been
monitored for two years at a frequency greater than annually, the Permittee may submit a
request to the Division for a permit modification to reduce the frequency of this monitoring
requirement. In no case,however,shall the frequency of this monitoring be less than once per
year when a residuals land application event of residuals generated by the residuals source-
generating facility occurs during that year.
IPIS4. Laboratory analyses as required by Condition IIL 2. and Condition M. 3. shall be
performed/gathered on the residuals as they are to be land applied. Furthermore, analytical
determinations made pursuant to the monitoring and reporting requirements of this permit
shall be made by a laboratory certified by the Division for the required parameter(s) under
15A NCAC 2H.0800 or 15A NCAC 2H.1100.
5. Proper records shall be maintained by the Permittee tracking all residuals land application
events. These records shall include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following
information:
a. Source of residuals;
b. Date of land application;
c. Location of land application(i.e.,site,field,or zone number);
d. Method of land application;
e. Weather conditions(i.e.,sunny,cloudy,raining,etc.);
f. Soil conditions(i.e.,dry,wet,frozen,etc.);
g. Type of crop or crops to be grown on field;
h. Volume of residuals land applied in gallons per acre, dry tons per acre, or kilograms per
hectare;
i. Volume of animal waste or other nutrient source applied in gallons per acre,dry ton per
acre,or kilograms per hectare(if applicable);
PrIN

•
j. Volume of soil amendments (i.e., lime, gypsum,etc.) applied in gallons per acre, dry ton
PIN per acre,or kilograms per hectare(if applicable);and
k. Annual and cumulative totals of dry tons per acre of residuals as well as animal waste and
other sources of nutrients (i.e., if applicable), annual and cumulative pounds per acre of
each heavy metal (i.e., shall include, but shall not be limited to, cadmium, copper, lead,
nickel, and zinc), annual pounds per acre of PAN, and annual pounds per acre of
phosphorus applied to each field.
6. A representative annual soils analysis (i.e., Standard Soil Fertility Analysis) shall be
conducted on each land application site on which a residuals land application event in the
respective calendar year has occurred, and the results shall be maintained on file by the
Permittee for a minimum of five years. The Standard Soil Fertility Analysis shall include,but
is not necessarily limited to,the following parameters:
Acidity•
Calcium • —--— Magnesium. Phosphorus'
Cation Exchange Capacity Manganese' Potassium'
Copper • Percent Humic Matter• Sodium•
Base Saturation(by calculation)• pH• Zinc
A heavy metals analysis shall be conducted on each land application site at least one time per
permit cycle and the results shall be maintained on file by the Permittee for a minimum of five
yam. .
4.
OFIS 7. Three copies of all required monitoring and reporting requirements as specified in Condition
M. 1.,Condition III.2.,Condition III.3.,Condition III.4.,Condition 111,5. and Condition III,
6. shall be submitted annually on or before March 1st of the year following the residuals land
application event to the following address:
NCDENR-DWQ
Water Quality Section
Non-Discharge Compliance/Enforcement Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,North Carolina 27699-1617
8. Noncompliance Notification:
The Permnittee shall report by telephone to the Water Quality Section of the Division's
Winston-Salem Regional Office at telephone number(336)771-4600,as soon as possible,but
in no case more than 24 hours or on the next working day following the occurrence or first
knowledge of the occurrence of any of the following:
a. Any occurrence with the residuals land application program that results in the land
application of significant amounts of residuals that are abnormal in quantity or
characteristic.
b: Any failure of the residuals land application program resulting in a release of material to
receiving waters.
c. Any time that self-monitoring information indicates that the residuals land application
program has gone out of compliance with the conditions and limitations of this permit or
Ps the parameters on which the program system was designed.
8

d. Any process unit failure,due to known or unknown reasons,that render the residuals land
r application program incapable of adequate residuals treatment.
e. Any spillage or discharge from a vehicle or piping system transporting residuals to the
application site.
Persons reporting such occurrences by telephone shall also file a written report in letter form
within five days following first knowledge of the occurrence. This report shall outline the
actions taken or proposed to be taken to ensure that the problem does not recur.
IV. GROUNDWATER REOUIREMENTS
1. 1. Lane Auulicatlon Site Remdjements:
a. Each land application site identified with a GW-A in the most recently-certified
Attachment B of this permit is dominated by soils with a mean seasonal high water table
greater than three feet below the land surface. Residuals land application events may
occur on these sites throughout the year.
b. Each land application site identified with a GW-B in the most recently-certified
Attachment B of this permit is dominated by soils with a mean seasonal high water table
between one and three feet below the land surface. Residual land application events on
these sites shall be prohibited from December through March, inclusive. No residuals
shall be land applied to these sites when the vertical separation between the depth of
residuals land application and the water table is less than three feet. The actual water
table depth for seasonally-restricted soils shall be verified by soil borings within 24 hours
prior to any residuals land application event that occurs from April through November,
inclusive. The number of borings advanced shall be sufficient to characterize water table
conditions across the land application site adequately. Any open borings shall be properly
filled with native soil,prior to the residuals land application event,to decrease the chance
of any residuals contaminating the groundwater.
2. Samofina Criteria
a. Monitor wells MW-1B, MW-2, MW-3, MW-135 and the Deep Well shall be sampled
every March,July,and November for the parameters listed below. Prior to sampling the
parameters,the measurement of water levels rest be taken. The depth to water in each
well shall be measured from the surveyed point on the top of the casing. The measuring
points(top of well casing)of all monitoring wells shall be surveyed relative to a common
datum.
Water Level pH
Nitrate Nitrogen(NO3-N) Total Dissolved Solids(TDS)
Cadmium Lead
Zinc Chromium
EPA Method 602,including Xylenes
b. Analytical determinations required by Condition 1.a. shall be made by a laboratory
certified by the Division for the required parameter(s)under 15A NCAC 2H.0800.
9

P" 3. Reverting/Documentation:
a. All reports and documentation(GW-59)shall be mailed to the following address:
Groundwater Section
Permits and Compliance Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,NC 27699-1636
Updated blank forms (GW-59) may be downloaded from the Groundwater Section's
website at http://gw.ehnr.state.nc.us/or requested front the address mentioned above.
b. The results of the sampling and analysis must be received on Form GW-59(Groundwater
Quality Monitoring:Compliance Report Form)by the Groundwater Section(address listed
in the "Reporting /Documentation" section of the Groundwater Requirements), on or
before the last working day of the month following the sampling month. The data of all
groundwater sampling analyses required by the permit conditions must be reported using
the most recent GW-59 form along with attached copies of the laboratory analyses.
2. Anolicabk Boundary Requirements:
a. The COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY for residuals land application programs is specified by
regulations in 15A NCAC 2L (i.e., "Groundwater Classifications and Standards"). The
Compliance Boundary for each land application site is established at either 250 feet from
the residuals land application area or 50 feet within the property boundary, whichever is
closest to the residuals land application area. An exceedance of Groundwater Quality
OPIN Standards at or beyond the Compliance Boundary is subject to immediate rernediation
action according to 15A NCAC 2L.0106(dX2).
b. The REVIEW BOUNDARY shall be established around each land application site
midway between the Compliance Boundary and the perimeter of the residuals land
application area. Any exceedance of Groundwater Quality Standards at the Review
Boundary shall require action in accordance with 15A NCAC 2L.0106(dX2).
3. Additional Reaudrements:
a. Any additional groundwater quality monitoring, as deemed necessary by the Division,
shall be provided.
V. INSPECTIONS
1. Prior to each residuals land application event, the Permittee or his designee shall inspect the
residuals storage, transport, and application facilities to prevent malfunctions and
deterioration,operator errors,and discharges that may cause or lead to the release of wastes to
the environment, a threat to human health, or a nuisance. The Permittee shall maintain an
inspection log or summary including at least the date and time of inspection, observations
made,and any maintenance,repairs,or corrective actions taken by the Permittee. This log of
inspections shall be maintained by the Permittee for a period of five years from the date of the
inspection and shall be made available to the Division or other permitting authority, upon
request.
10

2. Any duly authorized officer, employee, or representative of the Division may, upon
t^ presentation of credentials,enter and inspect any property,premises,or place on or related to
the land application sites or facilities at any reasonable time for the purpose of determining
compliance with this permit; may inspect or copy any records that must be kept under the
terms and conditions of this permit;and may obtain samples of groundwater,surface water,or
leachate.
VI. GENERAL CONDITIONS
1. This permit shall become voidable unless the residuals land application events are carried out
in accordance with the conditions of this permit, the supporting materials, and in the manner
approved by the Division.
2. This permit shall be effective only with respect to the nature and volume of residuals described
in the application and other supporting data.
3. Failure to abide by the conditions and limitations contained in this permit may subject
the Permittee to an enforcement action by the Division in accordance with North
Carolina General Statutes§143-215.6A through §143 215.6C.
4. The annual administering and compliance fee shall be paid by the Permittee within 30 days
after being billed by the Division. Failure to pay the fee accordingly may cause the Division
to initiate action to revoke this permit,as specified by 15 NCAC 2H.0205(cX4).
5. The issuance of this permit does not preclude the Pennittee from complying with any and all
statutes,rules,regulations,or ordinances that may be imposed by other government agencies
(i.e.,local,state,and federal)which have jurisdiction,including,but not limited to, applicable
river buffer rules in 15A NCAC 2B.0200,soil erosion and sedimentation control requirements
in 1SA NCAC Chapter 4 and under the Division's General Permit NCG010000, and any
requirements pertaining to wetlands under 1SA NCAC 2B .0200 and 15A NCAC.0500.
6. This permit may be modified, revoked, and/or reissued to incorporate any conditions,
limitations and monitoring requirements the Division deems necessary in order to protect the
environment and public health adequately.
7. The Permittee, at least six months prior to the expiration of this permit, shall request its
extension. Upon receipt of the request,the Division shall review the adequacy of the facilities
and residuals land application program described therein, and if warranted, shall extend the
permit for such period of time and under such conditions and limitations as it may deem
appropriate.
8. This permit shall not be automatically transferable. In the event that there is a desire for the
residuals land application program to change ownership or to change the name of the
Permittee, a formal permit request shall be submitted to the Division documentation from the
parties involved and other supporting materials as may be appropriate. The approval of this
request shall be considered on its merits and may or may not be approved.
OgN
11

•
Permit issued this the 18th day of July,2003.
NORTH OLINA AL MANAOEMEN'r COMMISSION
fat Alan W.Klimek,P.E.,Director •
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Permit Number WQ0005809
12

. rrclice:
' v.1 '' v ..� "K . !� WIN T+... w /!. ��.J-''4, '
idk. MR // •�� /�
--------____..::..:F*.
•
.,
....„ .
_ ) 4. ., !
. i _,...N./.........,. ( .;_.. ....r:(
•fi'xp;;
__ � A� � �°�-� ^ ,-- � ;� cam, '
, ,e,J,.....\,,,'T\ r\ .' %,,,*41 4......fr, _ ,-->„.... • • . 6.„._ --.. •
p),
\-CAftyie)k\,
77 . ''. !I
, ,. , . 1 s • '`� l�.N, : -:--.--,...i..,.:
i 3)\_,.S3•
.--\,. . 4,62 '. <--./1 L'i \‘' \ it- .i- r
> ) ,.,,... \_ . I '
• ;. �� . . , ,.1i/ 6 (:). .. '''
\ v� �,�
•
..__.,1 4.4.i, - - ..- ' ;:-.:41- ,,,Th-: (...,._(
j ,4,:i ,44.v.".7.• o.
, ,. it O j� �
r ` I \ ' •te4f C. a ,( • • \•
. , ..,/-.). ,
*_illitit •^
` ` OO� t.f
\�
, • _....tp. .. 1$0 , •/% • \
• �� � 'Alt-'')
.
7 ',. " ..0114i Ilk '. . '',.- - :. J..# g \...__.--.7- : c., - / : ..,_•.N.,..;„
`\ 1-
// 91:54.7., 471;if I ID—s"S\ N / ---,. :.• ',..._. ,• ,.:. c'.:'
, ( - .1\::-....:\c--2A—,,. ":... j ' '" - •‘-7,,...,— , .
...._ 44,-;-.:".., ,,,,,,------Sh-,
s_c,
r _
,_., ... ..„!\•..1 .,, w,
'' d'. c.- 1:-..
- .. ii � te ,� 'D`E' ' I
wf
.: 1:,� ,, • ,____k,. 1 •-• .,,,,. ...1.7,„Jii,`/
ifri...___
:-..1,1 •
: i' i poi-- P iht/ \;- --._•_--;\c' .,,;.\:.._.- ,.
it ,• ---., , - erl.St''',... -1,0•:-•-•.,....h4"\)) . .
-!1 J ... ::.-_J t r` 1 �; •t v, .ai 71 • Ili V i• ( r''�fr,\ \
,.s..1"---k\
----. r— - ;,•• 14/ 4\,,,,,..., c„,._. ..,,,--, .-P
e 1 \• ,:ii ....\\ ...., ,
....) I ..* :V'' ''...--. , --' \.‘71.\--'‘ \ -".if t'. \i‘s.,
{...A( A •••••••. -11:1111.\'5 los. ' I
-.' IL,41: i": A :,• M ','_10.7 f ( c= � �i^ ~fir, �-s`�, `\' (�
\ N.::\Jcilici''' q.L.....--••••••• 1 1.:(7"...*. Sr,... .. ,......, ir.:1 .7 N___/: r, ,
Si
c) • Jr )(_,./.> '-'1.
.14:71...P , ...) „ ,s,
,1�� \���
�t' .41
�:: t •'1 FIGURE I •
0444 SCALE IE FEET z '
COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANY
f 0 2,000 4,000 � { . : LAND APPLLCATLON OF RESIDUALS
"`' \ L� � ,r GUI ORD COUNTY
f-- i„^• f r%%�,�� WQoO05$09(GW03024
''�. ) \ ,..� ); , -. � , i , SITE LOCATION MAP
.ram ;

£OOZ 1I£Inf:MCI uogra 3 I Jo I alld 608S0006M'061)!Wi d
WS - MIL
1 T — p 4rso3 Jail INAI
V-MD L6 w9S'6L _ iE'�00''9E mono — i �TP dJ maim QI
V-MD 0r I Zf'9r'6L 1£'00'9f _ MAW) L J at9�d 1oPOIaJ DI
V-MD WI Zf'9S'6L 1f0'9�0E M1AlnD _ luedW03=!1a!d luIllolaD III
V-MD SS'I Zf"9S'6L Pf'00'9£ PRIMO L J�!Pd!d PPM) VI
' 1
-I'AI soPIPs°3 q
001138 aterolfddIf 4aV PM V 'I alisMr1 [mop aneseclopaervi Jattaoputel m PRAMS
(a)witikma vepumddr Ail S PP*71P man am SaagsaaaD
600rO00641'Mtd
sang 11011.3ffaaV Purl Pray-S IMUDVJ.LV
C ( (

. ) - ) .
,,,(4,4 „,,,, _40-% . .....)::=-- -(.- - - - "•'- 1: -. ,:.-.:... ..::-.-.---*. / . co 1 'AI f. ' ' *— - , 7.4—•—' 1---- it % ) 'IA
‘...‘ A 0.9?..4.<. /i:;/ . 40 , 41'. 4..* --.. •, 4., Dtst. . ._. , 4.17/
,. iir --.,.-..;•-•!--. .. 4-------,.,. , ,_ 1 -, --, , .5.:4zz .: 1I%lb..F•ci.
::::(/ • : 4 \s.,„ 4. .‘, iii, '',, ,, ..:-':, NI ' 1 i•eps
„, ..,-. , ..s:...$) ii . •
.:.,,-,- .0 -:0_ . ,,,,,,, __,._ i \::::..,,
.., , .. •.rw..... •90 15-'!):'' l'', (
'•• •: .•fii.14. •• /or agoli, ..,,N,,...., . /), ../..........: ...;'-4-11f,,,,,, ',s..1, . n , c ‘
.1' ...,:1:121-110.t ' ,. ..3: ,.. .. _N , 4" -- , *0- 4t. --''' -, 411111. 7/ : /----'
‘Irilli - ‘, •
"4114,...*•>• -: . il, .4' -....4q ,,,,N ,/ , - , -,---- :,- , ,/ / .... //
•. "irsip' '.
..,,.,:, . .4. . . , ,^lir i 0 t zmi-7.
/111Nr ,k)ii., ,
.:*.stN„:, ;- , .... 4_,, ,,,
.1 • - • •,:se c..-: Piloor / 1 /1
it i p i 6 k.
•iA,. .1/1
Ir.':-,:•.,
.tr'' ... , 't!' .
'.17.. ..„
IA �, • At •1 011044 �+ j poi,,
i,i
iii,
—.....mm....._ a pan. i le,. Sli / . W/
Nompd101111,,,,r:----,- ,L4t,,NowN%.,,,,,,,„„,„mitiwgiiirAs - ..7
,.?.0 -.........----:$7.1110; -z; -6- '''''11 .., / ' .,1.:41A i ,,f,„,
. ,,,,,, ,,, IN 1‘, "•' 101‘1N4,
• —.....0°-j614414j, ''&41 N\: 111111.4k44— '. —14ft\
--_414110111.1451161i
" ' '.41/4019141'' • filf
O 111*2 jj..`1,.‘k 4 . .7 -1-;*•••,.._....../ J r di
\.Mk 1444-1141‘, ..wA �� fi,. 04,e.):10)\ ram.
./ ?
. . . ti .--
4% 4. tk \ \
7..........."----....... Pk,
\ /
Afillr.w .-7,
i (
. 4:: _....._5 .1 :,.
� �� ti •;., C . . . ' �-.. 7
,
nit �.
Narttor. eIa.ra' NIT y+'sr•w 11+7 rr COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANY
. Co.90nia/ Pitdin-t Conyav
lJ Q OAP 580 9 LANDcovnrrYIDUALs
Gaa- ►,kP Cou 11, W�5 0 W03024
_....... ...rwq••7T w•A 11

� 3 3 -N /
• 144"
�Mi8
M• •MW 6 . C8 . 4,42'
�i ,M 64
BMW 3 .•• ... . .. .. +`
+i MW184 Iv W183 •• ® 56
• M 5�
M�88 , I .. RIl., .
• 37 \
, 27
• • X •
. Mili 2
• ir ON? .11
r c 4��ha t l.Q.•„e G. ')"� \ t
• wa oao sle 4.QR •
W 186
t DVARI� qPE . •
A
.
I W 26 .' .
litVMil 13
M1
•
• r
rift9
133 •
• V
• /
• .•
• • • • • •
•..
. g•• - pi le;em„, 8•.....lt ). .„ , ••• • mw 6 ,
/ gar 0,„ /
\ 4 5A �'` tiVrc
\ / ee J
‘ Ai� Pcot
FIGURE 3
COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANY
\ — .-• LAND APPLICATION OF RESIDUALS
r
r„— C B += Co�.Li A c.e B'4'44" , .�. �' GUILFORD COUNTY
�` ' �' •� /J Q09
u4rm W00058
rrnu Wmt1 7
T/GW03024 CN`ATIf1N MAP

Michael F.Easley,lrovemor
r�F W ATFR William G.Ross Jr.,Secretary
O� �G North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
-57
Coleen H.Sullins,Director
> - Division of Water Quality
O -<
October 18,2007
Mr.Faron Leigh
Colonial Pipeline Company
411 Gallimore Dairy Rd
Greensboro,NC 27409
SUBJECT: September 10,2007 Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Colonial Pipeline Company
Greensboro,NC Terminal Residuals Land Application Program(D)
Permit No: WQ0005809 and
Spray Irrigation Permit No: WQ0006317
Guilford County
Dear Mr Leigh:
Enclosed please find copies of the Compliance Evaluation Inspection forms from the inspection conducted
on September 10,2007. The Compliance Evaluation Inspection was conducted by Derek Denard of the
Winston-Salem Regional Office. The facility was found to be in Compliance with permit WQ0005809 and
WQ0006317.
• Upon Review of the annual report(s)for 2005 and 2006 for Land Application Permit WQ00058096 the
facility was found to be in compliance with monitoring requirements.Details noted from Annual Report
Review are as follows:
• Please note that permit condition I11.6.that a standard fertility analysis shall include:Acidity,
Calcium,Cation Exchange Capacity,Copper,Base Saturation(by calculation),Magnesium,
Manganese,Percent Humic Matter,pH,Phosphorus,Potassium, Sodium,Zinc,and Exchangeable
Sodium Percentage(by calculation).
• PAN was not reported or calculated in the 2005 annual report(see permit condition III.3.). PAN
and Phosphorus loading in pounds per acre was not reported on the annual land application field
summary form in accordance with permit condition III.5.k. Aluminum was not reported on the
annual residual sampling summary form,but was found in the attached data report. For further
details see Annual Report Review below.
A review of groundwater monitoring data for Land Application Permit WQ0005806 found that the
following constituents and concentrations exceeded 2L standards for the Deep Well:
• Benzene(0.001 mg/L):November 2005 0.590 mg/L,March 2006 0.590mg/L,July 2006 0.950
mg/L,November 2006 0.950 mg/L,March 2007 0.75 mg/L
• 1,2-Dichlorethane(0.00038 mg/L): July 2006 0.012 mg/L,November 2006 0.011 mg/L
• 1,2-Dichloropropane(0.00051 mg/L): July 2006 0.0014 mg/L,March 2007 0.0014 mg/L
Carolina
Nam`
Naturally
Division of Water Quality/Aquifer Protection Section Customer Service
585 Waughtown Street,Winston-Salem NC 27107 1-877-623-6748
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Internet: http://www.ncwaterqual itv.org
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer-50%Recycled/10%Post Consumer Paper

Mr. Leigh
October 18, 2007
Page 2 of 2
• Naphthalene (0.021 mg/L): July 2006 0.041 mg/L,November 2006 0.061 mg/L,
March 2007 0.066 mg/L
• Lead(0.015 mg/L): March 2003 0.0164 mg/L, July 2006 0.0154 mg/L
These results are due to contamination from old sludge storage pits and not from Land Application. They
want to change out and close the Deep Well and replace it with Well 183, which is already located on site.
If the permittee wishes to make this modification a permit modification application should be submitted to
the Central Office.
Review of groundwater monitoring also noted that EPA Method 8260 is being used in place of EPA
Method 620. Although permit Condition IV.2. specifies that EPA Method 602 be used,EPA Method 8260
is more than adequate for this purpose.
A review of NDMRs,NDARs and soil reports for Spray Irrigation Permit WQ0006317 for the period
October 2005 to September 2007 found the following:
• It was noted that the newly added parameters BOD,Total Coliform, TKN, TP were missing in the
November 2005 data. Also that the VOC method was changed to EPA Method 8260 in July 2006
to match the requirements for groundwater monitoring found permit condition IV. 1. b. Although
the VOC method for effluent monitoring is not specified it would be recommended that the same
method used for groundwater monitoring be used for the effluent monitoring as well. Please note
effluent monitoring was not reported on the March 2007 NDMR. However,this data was available
with the March 2007 groundwater data lab report. Please amend the March 2007 NDMR.
• A review of GW-59's for the period of November 2005 to March 2007 found the following:
It was noted that the VOC method was changed to EPA Method 8260 for the July 2006 report for
compliance with permit condition IV.1.b.
• Please note that permit condition 1II.6. that a standard fertility analysis shall include: Acidity,
Calcium, Cation Exchange Capacity, Copper,Base Saturation(by calculation), Magnesium,
Manganese, Percent Humic Matter, pH, Phosphorus, Potassium, Sodium,Zinc, and Exchangeable
Sodium Percentage (by calculation).
A review of GW-59's for the period of November 2005 to March 2007 found the following:
• It was noted that the VOC method was changed to EPA Method 8260 for the July 2006 report for
compliance with permit condition N.1.b.
• On the July 2006 GW-59 for MW-8 Chloride was reported in the space for Arsenic according to the
result was reported in the lab report.
Please refer to the enclosed inspection report for additional observations and comments. If you or your staff
have any questions, please call Derek Denard at 336-771-5286.
Sincerely,
Sit4MA-Y: k/4,,,4}
Sherri V. Knight, Pam.
Regional Aquifer Protection Supervisor
cc: Guilford County Health Department
APS Central Files
APS WSRO Files

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: WQ0005809 Effective: 07/18/03 Expiration: 06/30/08 Owner: Colonial Pipeline Company
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility:
Greensboro, NC Terminal Residuals Land
Ap lication Program(D)
County: Guilford PO Box 18855
Region: Winston-Salem
Atlanta GA 30326
Contact Person: Tom J Guzikowski Title: General Manager-Operati Phone:[phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC: Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s):
On-Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
NCG510210 Colonial Pipeline Company-Greensboro Terminal
WO0006317 Colonial Pipeline Company-Greensboro Terminal
0031046AC Colonial Pipeline Company-Greensboro Terminal
NC0031046 Colonial Pipeline Company-Greensboro Terminal
Inspection Date: 09/10/2007 Entry Time: 02:30 PM Exit Time: 04:00 PM
Primary Inspector: Derek Denard Phone:[phone]
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type:Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Land Application of Residual Solids(503 exempt)
Facility Status: ■ Compliant 0 Not Compliant
Question Areas:
III Miscellaneous Questions II Record Keeping 1111Land Application Site
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit:WQ0005809 Owner-Facility: Colonial Pipeline Company
Inspection Date:09/10/2007 Inspection Type:Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit:Routine
Inspection Summary:
PERMIT
• Land Application or Distribution? Land Application
• Is 503?exempt
• Class A or B? N/A
• Maximum Dry Tons Per Year: 3000
• Number of acres permitted: 5.64
• Total number of fields in permit: 4
• Counties that land is permitted for: Guilford
• Other Description:Tank bottom waste, petroleum contaminated sand blasting sand and petroleum contaminated soil
shall be approved for land application in accordance with this permit and no more than 225.00 dry tons per year of the
3000.00 maximum dry tons per year shall be tank bottom waste.
RECORD KEEPING
• Comments for record keeping:
• For further details on record keeping see questions on the inspection form.
SELF-MONITORING
• Upon Review of the annual reports)for 2005 and 2006 the facility was found to be in compliance with monitoring
requirements.
• Details noted from Annual Report Review:
Please note that permit condition 111.6. that a standard fertility analysis shall include:Acidity, Calcium, Cation Exchange
Capacity, Copper, Base Saturation (by calculation), Magnesium, Manganese, Percent Humic Matter, pH, Phosphorus,
Potassium, Sodium, Zinc, and Exchangeable Sodium Percentage(by calculation).
PAN was not reported or calculated in the 2005 annual report(see permit condition 111.3.). PAN and Phosphorus loading
in pounds per acre was not reported on the annual land application field summary form in accordance with permit
condition III.5.k. Aluminum was not reported on the annual residual sampling summary form, but was found in the
attached data report. For further details see Annual Report Review below.
Page: 2

•
Permit:WQ0005809 Owner-Facility: Colonial Pipeline Company
Inspection Date: 09/10/2007 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
• A review of groundwater monitoring found the following constituents and concentrations exceeded 2L standards for the
Deep Well:
Benzene (0.001 mg/L): November 2005 0.590 mg/L*, March 2006 0.590mg/L*,July 2006 0.950 mg/L, November 2006
0.950 mg/L, March 2007 0.75 mg/L
1,2-Dichlorethane (0.00038 mg/L): July 2006 0.012 mg/L, November 2006 0.011 mg/L
1,2-Dichloropropane (0.00051 mg/L): July 2006 0.0014 mg/L, March 2007 0.0014 mg/L
Naphthalene (0.021 mg/L): July 2006 0.041 mg/L, November 2006 0.061 mg/L, March 2007 0.066 mg/L
Lead (0.015 mg/L): March 2003 0.0164 mg/L, July 2006 0.0154 mg/L
(* used EPA Method 602, started using EPA Method 8260 in July 2006)
These results are due to contamination from old sludge storage pits and not from Land Application. They want to change
out and close the Deep Well and replace it with Well 183, which is already located on site. If the permit wishes to make
this modification a permit modification application should be submitted to the Central Office.
PATOGEN AND VECTOR ATTRACTION •
N/A
TREATMENT
N/A
STORAGE
Not evaluated
SAMPLING
Not evaluated
TRANSPORT
N/A
LAND APPLICATION SITE
See inspection questions for details.
OTHER
The Greensboro, NC Terminal Residuals Land Application Program was last inspected by Derek Denard of this office on
November 4, 2005.
Page: 3

Permit:WQ0005809 Owner•Facility: Colonial Pipeline Company
Inspection Date:09/10/2007 Inspection Type:Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
ANNUAL REPORT REVIEW
Reporting Period: 2005 and 2006
Monitoring Frequency for Condition III. 2. (TCLP): Annually
Monitoring Frequency for Condition III. 3. (Residuals Analysis)
and Condition III. 4. (Pathogen&Vector Attraction Reduction):Annually
1.Annual Land Application OR Annual Distribution and Marketing/Surface Disposal Certification Form
•Was a certification form submitted?YES
• Did it indicate compliance? NO, Benzene in Deep Well
• Was it signed by the appropriate people?YES
• If permitted for distribution how many dry tons per year was distributed? N/A
• Was land application conducted during the reported year? 2005 YES, 2006 NO
• What is the total number of fields in permit?4
•What was the total number of fields land application occurred during the year?4 in 2005
• What was the total acres land application occurred on this year? 5.64 in 2005
• How many dry tons and dry tons per acre were applied?436.46 tons and 77.38 tons per in 2005
• Were the applications within the permitted amount?YES
•Verify PAN if more than 10 tons/acre. See comments
• Comments: PAN not reported. PAN was verified based on the information provided to be between 25
and 99 mg/kg depending on what mineralization rate used in the calculation. This would give a
loading of any where between 4 and 15 lbs/acre.
2. Monitoring
Were the analyses conducted at the required frequency?YES
•Were the metals analyses reported on the Residual Sampling Summary Form?YES
• Were the results reported in mg/kg?YES
• Were the heavy metals within ceiling concentration permit limits?YES
• If no,were the lab analyses attached? N/A
• Were all the required parameters tested?YES, PAN can be calculated from data provided.
• Was TCLP analysis conducted? YES
• Comments:AL and PAN were not reported
3. Field Summary
•Were the land application events recorded on the Field Summary Forms?YES
•Was a Field Summary Form submitted for each field? YES
• Were all the residuals applied to permitted land?YES
•Were all the residuals applied from permitted sources?YES
Were the field loading rates for each metal and PAN calculated (year to date)? No see comment
• Were the cumulative pollutant loading rates calculated?YES
• Were the calculations correct? Not evaluated
•Were the PAN loading rates within permit limits?YES, based on calculations during this review.
•Were the heavy metal cumulative pollutant loading rates within permit limits?YES
• Were the residuals applied on a suitable crop?YES
•Were the applications conducted during the crop's growing season?YES
•Were the Field Summary Forms complete? NO see below
• Comments: PAN and Phosphorus loading was not calculated.
4. Pathogen and Vector Attraction Reduction
•Was a signed copy of the Pathogen and Vector Attraction Reduction Form submitted? N/A
• Did the form indicate the period of coverage, the residual class, and the pathogen reduction
alternative and the vector attraction reduction option used? N/A
•Was the appropriate documentation to show pathogen and vector attraction reduction
included in the report? N/A
• Was pathogen and vector attraction reduction demonstrated according to 40 CFR Part 503? N/A
Page: 4

Permit:W00005809 Owner-Facility: Colonial Pipeline Company
Inspection Date: 09/10/2007 Inspection Type:Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
If lime stabilization was used was the pH temperature corrected? N/A
• Comments:
5. Soil Tests
•Was a Standard Soil Fertility Analysis conducted for each application field?Yes for 2005
• Were the soil pH's 6.0 or greater for each application field?YES for 2005
Were the copper and zinc indexes in the soil less than 3000 for each application field?
• Comments: copper was at 9 to 16 mg/kg and Zinc was 38 to 144 mg/kg. Would have to convert to index
value.
•
6. General
• Was the report in the proper format? YES
•Were any parts of the annual report missing? NO
• Was the report submitted on time?2006 : YES, Received March 06, 2006 and March 02, 2007
• Comments:
Page: 5

Permit:WO0005809 Owner-Facility: Colonial Pipeline Company
Inspection Date: 09/10/2007 Inspection Type:Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit:Routine
Type Yes No NA NE
Distribution and Marketing n
Land Application ■
Record Keeping Yes No NA NE
Is GW monitoring being conducted, if required? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are GW samples from all MWs sampled for all required parameters? ■ n n n
Are there any GW quality violations? ■ n n n
Is GW-59A certification form completed for facility? ■ ❑ n ❑
Is a copy of current permit on-site? ■ n ❑ n
Are current metals and nutrient analysis available? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are nutrient and metal loading calculating most limiting parameters? ■ n n n
a. TCLP analysis? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
b. SSFA(Standard Soil Fertility Analysis)? ■ n n n
Are PAN balances being maintained? ❑ ❑ o ❑
Are PAN balances within permit limits? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Has land application equipment been calibrated? n n ❑ U
Are there pH records for alkaline stabilization? n n ■ 0
Are there pH records for the land application site? ❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Are nutrient/crop removal practices in place? ■ n n n
Do lab sheets support data reported on Residual Analysis Summary? • n n n
Are hauling records available? ❑ ❑ ■ n
Are hauling records maintained and up-to-date? n n ■ n
#Has permittee been free of public complaints in last 12 months? ■ n n n
Has application occurred during Seasonal Restriction window? 0 • 0 0
Comment: Bezene. See summary for comments.
Land Application Site Yes No NA NE
Is a copy of the permit on-site during application events? ■ n ❑ ❑
Is the application site in overall good condition? ■ n ❑ ❑
Is the site free of runoff/ponding? ■ ❑ ❑ n
If present, is the application equipment in good operating condition? ❑ ❑ ❑ ■
Page: 6

1 a
Permit:WO0005809 Owner-Facility: Colonial Pipeline Company
Inspection Date: 09/10/2007 Inspection Type:Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit:Routine
Are buffers being maintained? • n n n
Are limiting slopes buffered?
10%for surface application • n n n
18%for subsurface application n n ■ n
Are there access restrictions and/or signs? ■ n n n
Is the application site free of odors or vectors? ■ n n ❑
Have performance requirements for application method been met?
For injection? 0 0 ■ 0
For incorporation? 0 0 ■ 0
Does permit require monitoring wells? ■ n n n
Have required MWs been installed? ■ n n n
Are MWs properly located w/respect to RB and CB? ■ n ❑ ❑
Are MWs properly constructed(including screened interval)? ■ ❑ n n
Is the surrounding area served by public water? ■ n n n
If Annual Report indicates overapplication of PAN, are wells nearby that may be impacted? n 0 ■ n
Are soil types consistent w/Soil Scientist report/evaluation? ■ n n n
Is the water table greater than 1'/3'bls. 0 0 0 ■
Is application occurring at the time of the inspection? 0 • n 0
Comment: No comments.
Page: 7

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: WQ0006317 Effective: 10/28/05 Expiration: 09/30/10 Owner: Colonial Pipeline Company
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Greensboro Terminal
County: Guilford 411 Gallimore Dairy Rd
Region: Winston-Salem
Greensboro NC 27409
Contact Person: Faron Dale Leigh Title: Environmental Tech Phone:[phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC: Certification: Phone:
Secondary ORC(s): •
On-Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 09/10/2007 Entry Time: 02:30 PM Exit Time: 04:00 PM
Primary Inspector: Derek Denard Phone:[phone]
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Surface Irrigation
Facility Status: ■Compliant 0 Not Compliant
Question Areas:
IN Miscellaneous Questions •Treatment 1111 Record Keeping Treatment Lagoons
End Use-Irrigation
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

p
Permit:WQ0006317 Owner-Facility: Colonial Pipeline Company
Inspection Date: 09/10/2007 Inspection Type:Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
inspection Summary:
PERMIT
Non-discharge permit No. WQ0006317 is for the continued operation of a 7,140 gallon per day (GPD) surface irrigation
treatment and disposal facility consisting of a holding tank, an oil/water separator, an air stripping unit, a 257,000 gallon
clay-lined aerated lagoon with two 5 HP aerators, approximately 420 linear feet of three inch suction line, an 80 GPM
pump station, approximately 2,511 linear feet of three inch distribution force main, 2,820 linear feet of four inch force
main, 17 spray heads, 3.69 acres of spray area, and all associated pipe fittings, valves, and appurtenances to serve
Colonial Pipeline Company,with no discharge of waste to the surface waters.
RECORD KEEPING AND SELF-MONITORING
A review of NDMRs and NDARs for the period October 2005 to September 2007 found the following:
Effluent parameters that exceeded 2L standards were the following: for pH up to 9.3, Nitrate-Nitrite up to 98.4 mg/L, Total
Coliform up to 340/100 mL,TDS up to 7,230 mg/L, Chloride up to 757 mg/L. It was noted that the newly added
parameters BOD, Total Coliform, TKN, TP were missing in the November 2005 data. Also that the VOC method was
changed to EPA Method 8260 in July 2006 to match the requirements for groundwater monitoring found permit condition
IV. 1. b. Although the VOC method for effluent monitoring is not specified it would be recommended that the same
method used for groundwater monitoring be used for the effluent monitoring as well. Please note effluent monitoring was
not reported on the March 2007 NDMR. However,this data was available with the March 2007 groundwater data lab
report. Please amend the March 2007 NDMR.
A review of GW-59s for the period of November 2005 to March 2007 found the following:
It was noted that the VOC method was changed to EPA Method 8260 for the July 2006 report for compliance with permit
condition IV.1.b.
On the July 2006 GW-59 for MW-8 Chloride was reported in the space for Arsenic according to what was reported in the
lab report.
Please note that permit condition 111.6. that a standard fertility analysis shall include:Acidity, Calcium, Cation Exchange
Capacity, Copper, Base Saturation (by calculation), Magnesium, Manganese, Percent Humic Matter, pH, Phosphorus,
Potassium, Sodium, Zinc, and Exchangeable Sodium Percentage(by calculation).
FACILITY SITE REVIEW
FLOW MEASUREMENT
Influent flow is metered. There has been no flow to this treatment system since December 2004.
COMPLIANCE SCHEDULES
Page: 2

Permit:WQ0006317 Owner-Facility: Colonial Pipeline Company
Inspection Date: 09/10/2007 Inspection Type:Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit:Routine
N/A
LABORATORY
Analytical Environmental Services
•
SLUDGE UTILIZATION/DISPOSAL
N/A
OTHER
The last inspection was conducted by Derek Denard of this office on November 4, 2005.
ADDITIONAL INSPECTION QUESTIONS
Soil Tests
Was a Standard Soil Fertility Analysis conducted for each application field?YES
Were the soil pH's 6.0 or greater for each application field?YES
Were the copper and zinc indexes in the soil less than 3000 for each application field? Not evaluated
Page: 3

Permit:WQ0006317 Owner-Facility:Colonial Pipeline Company
Inspection Date: 09/10/2007 Inspection Type:Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit:Routine
Type Yes No NA NE
Infiltration System n
Reuse(Quality)
Single Family Spray, LR n
Activated Sludge Drip,LR n
Activated Sludge Spray, HR
Activated Sludge Spray, LR ❑
Single Family Drip
Recycle/Reuse
Lagoon Spray, LR ■
Treatment Yes No NA NE
Are Treatment facilities consistent with those outlined in the current permit? ■ n n n
Do all treatment units appear to be operational?(if no, note below.) • 000
Comment: No Comments
Record Keeping Yes No NA NE
Is a copy of current permit available? • ■ n n n
Are monitoring reports present: NDMR? ■ n n n
NDAR? ■ n n n
Are flow rates less than of permitted flow? ■ n n n
Are flow rates less than of permitted flow? ■ n n n
Are application rates adhered to? ■ n n n
Is GW monitoring being conducted, if required(GW-59s submitted)? ■ n n n
Are all samples analyzed for all required parameters? ■ n n n
Are there any 2L GW quality violations? 0 ■ n n
Is GW-59A certification form completed for facility? ■ n n n
Is effluent sampled for same parameters as GW? ■ n n n
Do effluent concentrations exceed GW standards? ■ n n n
Are annual soil reports available? ■ n ❑ n
#Are PAN records required? n ■ n n
#Did last soil report indicate a need for lime? n ■ n n
Page: 4

La
ai
a)CI ❑ CI ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ z ❑ CI CI O ❑ CI ❑ ❑ CI ❑ ❑ O ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ■ CI co
■ O ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ O ■ ❑ z ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ O ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ O ❑ ❑ CI ❑
t, ❑ CI ❑ ❑ ❑ O ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ z ❑ ■ ❑ ❑ CI ❑ ❑ ❑ CI CI ■ ■ ❑ ❑ O ❑ ❑ ■
❑ ■ ■ ■ II ■ ■ ■ ❑ ■ m ■ CI ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ❑ CI ❑ ■ ■ ■ ❑ O
w }
p
0
cc
e To
n a.
E o
U• Fa C�
a) '> 0 ate)
5 > c
w c.. V C
Tv o U) a) c N
•d c L a) m 0
• N C U)
c• - O a) Q' Of
E E E •y o c
0
) o c.. a) (.• v
r•U U > U) U 3
O a) U
a) w. p- •N ) U O a C
E p. (.. C O_ ca C �... N CO 3 U)
V 1- �- 6) N EO C O C = O) co
L. C W - U a) C C a)
LL
cm Z C) - 0 m -E 0 a) a) a) v 3 m c a`) CO
c a c c U a c.. U "E _a c Q a) a) 0 o a c
• U) O O U N E a) U/ a... _ e' p O NL,,. 2` E O O
• C a) Q) (�- O. CO 0
(� N `) U 8• N a) a (�- E a) (a O) p. m O 0- a) �O d >.
(.. a) r r o c U — 0 .E rn a`) cc) a`) C U, U u) .0 — a�i a) (..
y O O U fa •m C �` .O c O. N n. �. C Q) O @ a) O_
E co .c
o. CO
c o n � o n) o w c c — "' c c as o o 0. m
O N (a a) O N @ C '5 O -a N E Q) 7 0_ C Q) a) O O L L_ 3 V) U) E
O o c ai a) CO v 'm 2 a) al m z o) a. c o- Ea a) c 3 3 a) ca o. a) a) -t°o
o m n co (.. a) v o — .5 3 w m ur > 3 3
L v) co 0. Q a) aa)) O N a) O j .>' CO citi 0 C � N N a) a) 0 N 0) C a)
m = O > a o m — a) u) (/) +r v 0. v2 c c w 3 3 0 0
E co a) _ a) N N C .0 N (o a) O > -O Oa) O O C >. T L, a) O O O O)
o CI L c r U) U) c O a) w 'O U O C a) 0) CO CO N U) O_ 0- , 3 a C C c
d o O c0 a) N N O 6 d aci C •L U@i N a U ..- N U U 0 a) O. a .O d >. E E O
U N (0 L L L f9 fl. E >. E cN (CD `. > p d U a a y to y N w .V O OC
— N N U) U) N a CO C N U U U) U) @ f6 al "O a) C C U •C
o.4) o f6 m m 0. 0o Q- co) a) E D _a a) a) a) a) a) a) a) a) 00 CO n) 3 0 0 0 E
C V) ..+ O L L L L L L L L (O N `) O E c y a) a)
< < a a < I . Z U IL Q U) U) (A coU) U) U) 03 U) < < I 2 * < < <

Permit:WQ0006317 Owner-Facility:Colonial Pipeline Company
Inspection Date:09/10/2007 Inspection Type:Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit:Routine
Comment: No Comments
001 -
Treatment Lagoons Yes No NA NE
Lagoon Type Aerated
Primary/Secondary Primary
Influent structure ❑ Q Q ■
Comment: No flow
Banks/berms(seepage and erosion) 0 0 0 ■
Comment: No flow
Vegetation(excessive vegetation on banks/berms) n n n •
Comment: No flow
Liner n n n ■
Comment: No flow
Liner Type Full,clay
Baffles/curtains n n n ■
Comment: No flow
Freeboard Marker ❑ n ❑ ■
Comment: No flow
Required freeboard
Actual freeboard
Are increments clearly marked on gauge at adequate intervals? n n n U
Comment: No flow
Has the water level gauge been surveyed w/respect to lowest point on dike?wall? n n n ■
Comment: No flow
No Evidence of overflow n n U
Comment: No flow
Acceptable color n Q ❑ ■
Comment: No flow
Page: 6

,
Permit:WQ0006317 Owner-Facility: Colonial Pipeline Company
Inspection Date: 09/10/2007 Inspection Type:Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit:Routine
Floating mats 0 0 0 •
Comment: No flow
Excessive solids buildup 0 0 0 ■
Comment: No flow
Aerators/mixers 0 0 0 •
Comment: No flow
Effluent structure 0 0 0 •
Comment: No flow
Lagoon cover 0 0 0 •
Comment: No flow
Page: 7

RECEIVED
C D€ t cj E!.'R
Colonial Pipeline Company JAN 1 1 2006
Creating Excellence in Transportation Services
'JY nstci•Ja'e".
Regicnal Cfffce
FARON D. LEIGH Telephone: [phone]
Mid-Atlantic District Environmental Technician Facsimile: 336-292-6462
Monday,January 09,2006
NCDENR-Division of Water Quality
Non-Discharge Unit
Attn: Mr.Derek Denard
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem,NC 27107
SUBJECT: Spray Irrigation Permit Inspection—Amended NDMR
Colonial Pipeline Company—Greensboro Facility
Guilford County,North Carolina
Permit No.WQ0006317
Mr.Derek Denard,
Attached are an original and two copies of the amended NDMR from our July 2005 monitoring event. I apologize for this taking so
long but the holidays really got me behind. Thanks again for your assistance with the inspection and please give me a call at 336-294-
9737 if you have questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
4<Faron D.Leigh
attachments
411 Gallimore Dairy Road Greensboro,North Carolina 27409

O�O�W A r •RQG Michael F.Easley,Governor
William G.Ross Jr.,Secretary
fjj r North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W.Klimek,P.E.Director
Division of Water Quality
December 2,2005
Mr. Faron Dale Leigh
Colonial Pipeline Company
411 Gallimore Dairy Rd
Greensboro NC 27409
SUBJECT: November 4,2005 Compliance Evaluation
Colonial Pipeline Company
•
Greensboro Terminal
Permit No: WQ0006317
Guilford County
Dear Mr. Leigh:
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Evaluation form from the inspection conducted on November 4,2005.
The Compliance Evaluation was conducted by Derek Denard and Peter Pozzo of the Winston-Salem Regional Office.
Present for the inspection was Faron Leigh, ORC. The facility was found to be in Compliance with permit WQ0006317.
The following items were noted for this inspection:
• The July 2005 NDMR should be amended to include missing effluent parameters as listed in permit Condition III(3).
• The hourly application rate for field#2 was 0.162 inches as reported on NDARs. The permitted hourly rate is 0.15
inches as stated in Condition II(7)for the permit issued on October 28,2005. Application equipment for field#2
should be adjusted to meet this permit condition.
Please refer to the enclosed inspection report for additional observations and comments. If you or your staff have any
questions, please call Derek Denard or me at 336-771-4600.
Sincerely,
Sherri V.Knight,P.E.
Regional Aquifer Protection Supervisor
cc: Faron Dale Leigh,ORC
Guilford County Health Department
DWQ-APS-Land Application Unit
WSRO-APS
Not Carolina
Naturally
Division of Water Quality/Aquifer Protection Section Customer Service
585 Waughtown Street,Winston-Salem NC 27107 1-877-623-6748
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Internet: http://gw.ehnr.state.nc.us
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer—50%Recycled/10%Post Consumer Paper

4-kr2 e /7flee/
NON DISCHARGE WASTEWATER MONITORING REPORT Page 1 of 1
PERMIT NUMBER: WQ0006317 MONTH: ay/y YEAR: agate '
FACILITY NAME: Colonial Pipeline Company CLASS: / COUNTY: Guilford
5(xis° - 004(X) 00515 00940 00610 00530 00556 C0929 00916 00927
Sampled at the point prior to irrigation Sampled at the poinlprior to imgation
Daily Rate ' 'a B Enter parameter code above name and units belo N
D Operator (Flow) ��//]] j — —�,
I ,anal Operator ORC into -ili 'D .g am 011
t Time 24(X) Time On ,an Treatment n 'p�,
e Clock Site Site' System pH '�" n!•n 8 NH3-N TSS Grease »ea1Qur Sillt1 g W
HdRS Y/N MOD ()NITS +/L MG/L MG/L MG/L WA/ /C`� M` `/Lt tiCA
1 age !3 y 0
2 1 . N 4
3 ft Q
4 I 1/ 4
5 Jul e
6 N 0
9./s *1.10 oo /
10 0 .
11 DAM g
y °
12ei30 A o
140`Ja 01 Y., 45
g y
15D6ie S y 0
1 6 /'/
1 7 41
1 8 0730 ? Y
19 ow a � 'yw
2 0 // /
21 owo r- y
22
23 ^/ 4
24 N e
2 5 o7oe S y s
2606,0 R
2716 30 /QQ d
28Dd X
29 ,+6Jd S Y 1 61eo 7,31 31, / 4160 , 4,T., 50.5 / 70alao 777//ZIA
31 /y
Average o 1•111770 73/ ;I,// /Aire 4?.5` 30. 5 /y7T ao./w 2)7//,.D.?
Maximum Q - `7f'O 73/ 21.1.lt`, ' ' ,y .5 5d.5 /770,r6.d0 7.72,/I `.a 2
Minimum o 67Ye 23/ /I. / /�$0 /2.3 5D.S /77a 6. AD 1. 27 //3.D,?
beragEMonthly Limit 0.2128
Composite (C) /Grab (G) G G G G G G G G G G G
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE (ORC) Faron D. Leigh GRADE I PHONE [phone]
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED ❑
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES (1) Analytical Fny yir t (2)
PERSON(S) COLLECTING SAMPLES Faron D. Leigh
Mail ORIGINAI and Trion rvnoic.c..):
ATTN: Info. piQEEsin3 Lit r
DIV.OF ENVIRONMENTAL MGT. X _
DEHNR (SIGNATURE OF OPERATOR IN RESIIONSIBLE CHARGE)
1617 Mail Service Ctr. BY THIS SIGNATURE,I CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS ACCURATE
RALEIGH, NC 27699 AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
NDMR-1 (7/94)
*EPA 602 - See Attached

•
FACILITY STATUS:
Please check one of the following:
1. All monitoring data and sampling frequencies meet permit requirements. jR compliant
•
1. All monitoring data and sampling frequencies do NOT meet permit requirements. ❑ non-compliant
If the facility is non-compliant. please explain in the space below the reason(s) the facility was not in compliance with its
permit. Provide in your explanation the dater s) of the noncompliance and describe the corrective action(s) taken. Attach
additional sheets if necessary.
"I certify. under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in
accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information
suhm:'ted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system,or those persons directly responsible for
gathering the information, the information suhtnitted is. to the best of my knowledge and belief, true,accurate,and complete.
i am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and
imprisonment for knowing violations.'
_Steve E. Jacobs — General Manager Operations
(Permittee- Please print or type)
(Signature of Permittee)** (Date)
Cblcnial Pipeline arty — 411 Gallimore Dairy Rd. _J336) 292-0427 6-30-2002
(Permittee Address) Greensboro, NC 27409 (Phone Number) (Permit Exp.Date)
PARAMETER CODES
()1002 Arsenic 31504 Coliform,Total 01067 Nickel 00929 Sodium
01022 Boron 00094 Conductivity 00600 Nitrogen,Total 00931 SAR
00310 BODS 01042 Copper 00630 NO2&NO3 00745 Sulfide
01027 Cadmium 00300 Dissolved Oxygen 00620 NO3 00515 TDS
00916 Calcium 31616 Fecal Colitortn 00556 Oil-Grease 00010 Temperature
•
00940 Chloride 01051 Lead 00400 pH 00625 TKN
• 50060 Chlorine,Total 00927,Magnesium 32730 Phenols 00680 TOC
Residual
01034 Chromium 71900 Mercury 00665 Phosphorus,Total 00530 TSS
00340 COD 1)0610 N113 as N 00937 Potassium 01092 Zinc
Parameter Code assistance may he obtained by calling the Water Quality Compliance Group at(919)733-5083,ext.536.
The monthly average for Fecal Coliform is to be reported as a GEOMETRIC mean. Use only units designated in the reporting facility's
permit for reporting data.
** If signed by other than the permittee,delegation of signatory authority must be on file with the state per 15A NCAC 2B.0506(b)(2)(D).

/9-kr2 ca 4'7 de c/
NON DISCHARGE WASTEWATER MONITORING REPORT Pe9e 1 of 1
PERMIT NUMBER: WQ0006317 MONTH: CTyly YEAR: pZOD
4.
FACILITY NAME: Colonial Pipeline Company CLASS: // COUNTY: Guilford
5(6)50 004(61 100515 100940 00610 00530 00556 00929 00916 i( 27
Samriej.0 the point prior to irrigation Samped at the pointunor to irrigation _
Duly Rate Enter parameter code above name and units belo
Operator (Flow) � �j g
1 meal O rator :�Rt_ into �'O g •.+� Oil & '3 O C.�
t Time 2400 Time Or, n Treatment ZZ 'Pt
e Clock Site Ste System pH �,S r NH3-N TSS G E9.9e 3 n Cadlolur SiUt1 x
H Y RS i iN �1GD UNITS I� �1G.
, I 'I, 5 G/1G/L ML Miffs IC A, M/L MJiL t
d i
2 i N 4
3 9
4 • a
5
6 I IN 0 .
7 1 . �Nv D a
9 i Y
9 /s'oo
10 I IN D
11D7401 S
12400 R j y , p _
14 O`70 IfI y Q -
15 a,JO g y 0
1a07./0 ? Y _ _
1906.0_ c Y
20 y [!
2, oyoo. r-
22
23 N e
24 N D
25 0700 53, s26 04,30 Ify
27 e6 3e / Y d
29�6 ' c 67V 7.51 33, i /aaa: /2 S so.r 1990' 6,..10 7. 77 if/Jot
3 0 _ A/
31
Average o '67,19 73/ _J. 1 /.Zg0 h4.5' SD. 5 /790-6.elD 7.)7/Zia?
Maximum 6 7j 9 23/ 21./ /t$D A1.5 tj .5 /770 4 do 7 77 Aid
Minimum 0 G,YD 73/ t.71. / 440 /2.5 so.s /777 J4 2 77 //I.00,t
Piverdganonthty Limit 0.2128
Composite (C) /Grab (G) GGGGGG GGGGG
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE (ORC) Faron D. Leigh GRADE I PHONE [phone]
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED ❑
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES (1) Analytical F.nv. SPrvics (2)
PERSON(S) COLLECTING SAMPLES Faron D. Leigh
Mail ORIGINAI an.i-nAinr'r-s^trc.i_
ATTN: Info. amassing Mit r
DIV.OF ENVIRONMENTAL MGT. X _ f✓-__ _
DEHNR 1SIGNATURE OF OPERATOR IN RES SIBLE CHARGE)
1617 Mail Service Ctr. BY THIS SIGNATURE,I CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS ACCURATE
RALEIGH. NC 27699 AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
NOMR-1 -:94,
*Fyn FIT) _ c.c.n n4-+m,-i,o-:

FACILITY STATUS:
Please check one of the following:
1. All monitoring data and sampling frequencies meet permit requirements. compliant
1. All monitoring data and sampling frequencies do NOT meet permit requirements. ❑ non-compliant
If the facility is non-compliant. please explain in the mace below the reason(s) the facility was not in compliance with its
permit. Provide ;n your explanation the .later s) of the noncompliance and describe the corrective action(s) taken. Attach
additional sheets if necessary.
"I certify. under pcnaity of lacy. that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in
accor, ..;ice with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information
ohm ed. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for
eathr rig the information. the information submitted is. to the hest of my knowledge and belief, true,accurate, and complete.
I am :.,vase that there :;re significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fines and
imprisonment for 'know ing iolations'
_Steve E. Jacobs — General Manager Operations
(Permtttee- Please print or type) 9/
(Signature of Pcrmittee)** (Date)
Colonial Pireline Gancanv — 411 Gallimore Dairy Rd. t 36) 292—C427 6-30-2002
(Permittee :Address) Greensboro, NC 27409 (Phone Number) (Permit Exp.Date)
PARAMETER CODES
OlOi2 .kr,entc 11504 Coli form,Total 01067 Nickel 00929 Sodium
01022 Boron 000094 Conductivity 00600 Nitrogen,Total 00931 SAR
0)310 BODS 01042 Copper 00630 NO2&NO3 00745 Sulfide
01027 Cadmium 00300 Dissolved Oxygen 00620 NO3 00515 TDS
00916 Calcium 31616 Fecal Colifonn 00556 Oil-Grease 00010 Temperature
00940 Chlonde 01051 Lead 00400 pH 00625 TKN
500k60 Chlorine.Total 00927 Magnesium 32730 Phenols 00680 TOC
Residua
01034 Chromium -1900 Mercury 00665 Phosphorus,Total 00530 TSS
(N)341) COD 00610 N113 as N 00937 Potassium 01092 Zinc
Parameter Code assistance may be obtained by calling the Water Quality Compliance Group at(919)733-5083,ext. 536.
The monthly average (or Fecal ('oliform is to he reported as a (CF.ON1PTRIC mean. Use only units designated in the reporting facility's
permit for reporting
.. If siincd In other than the permittee.delegation of signatory authority must he on file with the state per 15A NCAC 2B.0506(b)(2)(DI.

/ ✓ kr?P3'I ale.I
NON DISCHARGE WASTEWATER MONITORING REPOR Page 1 of 1
Az PERMIT NUMBER: WQ0006317 MONTH: (7.,/ YEAR: �o
FACILITY NAME: Colonial Pipeline Company CLASS: / COUNTY: Guilford
>r>,0,> ,xutwt C0515 00940 00610 00530 00556 00929 00916 100927
Same co at the point prior to jmgation Sam led at the int nor to tmaation
Daily Rate 'FiEnter parameter code above name and units belo
D Operator (Flows !(�! ?��I ((((���?t?r`-���tt11 —
a :kr-mal Operito ORC into 11 •U 4�. oil & ,— O
t Time 2400l Time On ,n Treatment ZZ1 `� Q
e CIA.k Site Site' Sv.lcm pH A 14 ei NH3-N TSS Gn a._ S U.
�le Ti1un Call er Slun . 4 E
FIRS Y N %.1GD 1'NITS WA .MMG/L M1G/L MG/L. WI, jvj/, liC/j, /L, WA,
1 eag n y io .
2 Hwy' D -
3 /Y- 4 _ _
4 - N 0 ,
5 i JSl 0
6 N 0 _
7 , N 1
9 /.50G. H / O •
10 I 4110700I S Y e :
12�,630 R y , o .
13 04,101 al i Y 0 .
1 4 a/le I R , / O '
15D63O g _ y _ 0 -
1 6 I N`i (!
18017J0 I 8 Y _
19 p4,3e. a y
20 1Y _ .
210700: 9- y
22 I N _
23 N
24 I .w . 0n ,
2 5 0700 ¶ ([
2 6 06,j0 R Y V�j
27 D6 3e /Q c
Yd
28 2s O6 $8 6 7M 7.3/ 3J. / /oibll 41. 5 50,S' / 90 6,d0 7. 77/if.Ba
30 /Y^/
31 /1'
Average o iiim 7plis 73/ 3.1/ /Agra /a.s` 50. 5 /y90 6.A0 1.)7//JtD.t
Maximum 4/,�7f 0 23/ 2.1.I /ell ,fit.5 tre.5 /770_6.d 7 72'A'Aid
G
Minimum 0 23/ ill //itZ le /2.5 SD.S /790 f. A0 2 77 //i4,2
Averagtvlonthly Limit 0.2128
Composite (C) I Grab (G) G G G G G G G G G G G
OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE (ORC) Faron D. Leigh GRADE I PHONE [phone]
CHECK BOX IF ORC HAS CHANGED ❑
CERTIFIED LABORATORIES (1) Analytical F]n_._ SPrviam4 (2)
PERSON(S) COLLECTING SAMPLES Faron D. Leigh
Mail ORIGINAI 211,4-nron^^rice ti-
ATTN: Info. Amassing lit r
DIV.OF ENVIRONMENTAL MGT. X
DEHNR (SIGNATURE OF OPERATOR IN RES SIBLE CHARGE)
1617 Mail Service Ctr. BY THIS SIGNATURE,I CERTIFY THAT THIS REPORT IS ACCURATE
RALEIGH. NC 27699 AND COMPLETE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
NDMR-1 ;141
*WC% Grr) — Cm 14-4-1r3-n-i

FACILITY' STATUS:
Please check one of the follow int :
1. All :monitoring data and sampliuc frequencies meet permit requirements. jgj compliant
1. All iutiniloring data and san)plin_ freuuencies do NOT meet permit requirements. 0 non-compliant
if the factlit\ is non-compliant. please :.\riain in the space below the reason(s) the facility was not in compliance with its
permit. Provide :n :.our explanation the ,late)s t of the noncompliance and describe the corrective action(s) taken. Attach
additional sheets if necessary.
"l certify. under penalty of Ia.k. that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in
accon ..nce %%ith a s%stent desi_ncd to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information
submit ,';1. I>.isc;i on n)y inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system. or those persons directly responsible for
Bathe. to the :alorrmation. the i„t„rtnation suhinitted is. to the hest of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete.
i am ::'.+':!re ti;:it 'Here :ire significant penalties for suhn)ittinc false information, including the possibility of fines and
imprisonment for Isnov1/4 ins_ iolations"
_Steve E. Jacobs — General Manager Operations
(1ermittee- Please print or type) JJ
(Signature of Permittee)** (Date)
Oolonial Pil cline (r' nv — 411 Gallimore Dairy Rd. _1336) 292-0427 6-30-2002
I Permittee :address) Greensboro, NC 27409 (Phone Number) (Permit Exp.Date)
PARAMETER CODES
1)11i_` Arsenic ?150.3 Coiilmn,Total 01067 Nickel 00929 Sodium
0102 Boron 1i0094 Conductivity 00600 Nitrogen,Total 00931 SAR
I03I0 BOD5 010.42 Copper 00630 NO2&NO3 00745 Sulfide
u1027 Cadmium (10300 Dissolved Oxygen 00620 NO3 00515 TDS
u)916 Calcium 3I6ln Fecal Coliforrn 00556 Oil-Grease 00010 Temperature
n091n (-blonde 0105I Lead 00400 pH 00625 TIN
50060 Chlunne.Tonal 00927 Magnesium 32730 Phenols 00680 TOC
Residual
01031 Chromium '1900 Mercury 00665 Phosphorus,Total 00530 TSS
iir)un COD nu610 N113 as N 00937 Potassium 01092 Zinc
Parameter('ode assistance may he obtained hy calling the Water Quality Compliance Group at(919) 733-5083, eat. 536.
The monthly a\erae for Decal Coliforn) is to he reported as a GEOMETRIC mean. Use only_units designated in the reporting facility's
hermit for reporting data.
** If signed by other than the pernrittee.delegation of signatory authority must be on file with the state per 15A NCAC 2B.0506(b)(2)(D).

• - .
Colonial Pipeline Company REcD
Creating Excellence in Transportation Services N•C• D `i' of MT%
AUG 1 2 2002
FARON D. LEIGH ( Wingt 294 9737
Mid-Atlantic District Environmental Technician Fgt✓gi6fii{nlT oe-292-642
Thursday,July 25,2002 c l rTl r
\v,t T 0 -
NCDENR-Division of Water Quality J 1`I•`_
Non-Discharge Permitting Unit
Attn: Kristen Miquez
1617 Mail Service Center • p;cCF;AI;u PcF.':
Raleigh,NC 27699-1617 ,——
SUBJECT:
, Carolina
Dear Ms.Miquez:
Please find enclosed the additional information requested in your letter dated June 26,2002. Colonial Pipeline Company very much
appreciates your assistance with this permit renewal. I would also like to thank you for relaxing the 1"= 100'scale requirement and
allowing us to use the 1"= 150'scale. If you have questions or require additional information,please contact me at 336-294-9737 or
at the letterhead address.
o
Sincerely.
Faron D.Leigh
w n�.
Enclosures t•• 2
J
cc: Jeff D. Titus, Colonial Pipeline Company,Mid-Atlantic District Environmental Project Manager w/enclosures
411 Gallimore Dairy Road Greensboro,North Carolina 27409

Colonial Pipeline Company
Creating Excellence in Transportation Services
FARON D.LEIGH Telephone: [phone]
Environmental Technician Facsimile: 336-294-3192
Friday,December 30,2005 e t ED
Ce t•of
i9 'n +r '�
NCDENR ThN 0
.2115
Winston-Salem Regional Office �• - ;
Water Quality Section 'GVII(441
:Se�61e.
585 Waughtown Street •
Winston-Salem,NC 27107
Subject: Spray Irrigation Permit No. —WQ0006317
Colonial Pipeline Company—Greensboro, Guilford County
Annual Composite Spray Field Soil Analyticals
Enclosed are two (2)copies of the analytical results from our annual soil-sampling event. If you have any
questions or require any additional information,please contact me at the letterhead address or at(336)294-
9737. Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
Faron D. Leigh
cc: Jeff W. Richards, CPC District Environmental Project Mgr. (w/enclosures)
411 Gallimore Dairy Road Greensboro,North Carolina 27409

WOW ATFMichael F.Easley,Governor
� G William G.Ross Jr.,Secretary
rNorth Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
>
O Alan W.Klimek,P.E.Director
Division of Water Quality
December 2,2005
Mr.Faron Dale Leigh
Colonial Pipeline Company
411 Gallimore Dairy Rd
Greensboro NC 27409
SUBJECT: November 4,2005 Compliance Evaluation
Colonial Pipeline Company
Greensboro Terminal •
Permit No: WQ0006317
Guilford County
Dear Mr.Leigh:
Enclosed please find a copy of the Compliance Evaluation form from the inspection conducted on November 4,2005.
The Compliance Evaluation was conducted by Derek Denard and Peter Pozzo of the Winston-Salem Regional Office.
Present for the inspection was Faron Leigh,ORC. The facility was found to be in Compliance with permit WQ0006317.
The following items were noted for this inspection:
• The July 2005 NDMR should be amended to include missing effluent parameters as listed in permit Condition III(3).
• The hourly application rate for field#2 was 0.162 inches as reported on NDARs. The permitted hourly rate is 0.15
inches as stated in Condition 11(7)for the permit issued on October 28,2005. Application equipment for field#2
should be adjusted to meet this permit condition.
Please refer to the enclosed inspection report for additional observations and comments. If you or your staff have any
questions,please call Derek Denard or me at 336-771-4600.
Sincerely,
Sherri V.Knight,P.E.
Regional Aquifer Protection Supervisor
cc: Faron Dale Leigh,ORC
Guilford County Health Department
DWQ-APS-Land Application Unit
ll�
No Carolina
,Naturally
Division of Water Quality/Aquifer Protection Section Customer Service
585 Waughtown Street,Winston-Salem NC 27107 1-877-623-6748
Phone: [phone] Fax: [phone] Internet: http://m.ehnr.state.nc.us
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer—50%Recycled/10%Post Consumer Paper

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: WO0006317 Effective: 10/28/05 Expiration: 09/30/10 Owner: Colonial Pipeline Company
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Greensboro Terminal
County: Guilford 411 Gallimore Dairy Rd
Region: Winston-Salem
Greensboro NC 27409
Contact Person: Faron Dale Leigh Phone:[phone]
Directions to Facility:
Primary ORC: Faron Dale Leigh Certification: 14891 Phone:[phone]
Secondary ORC(s):
John W.Culbreath Certification:23120 Phone:[phone]
On-Site Representative(s):
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 11/04/2005 Entry Time: 09:00 AM Exit Time: 12:00 PM
Primary Inspector: Derek Denard Phone: [phone]
Ext.382
Secondary Inspector(s):
Peter F Pozzo Phone:
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type:Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Surface Irrigation
Facility Status: ■ Compliant 0 Not Compliant
Question Areas:
■Treatment Flow ■Treatment Flow .Miscellaneous Questions aTreatment Flow
Measurement-Effluent Measurement-Influent Measurement-Water Use
Records
•Treatment •Record Keeping I.Treatment Lagoons End Use-Irrigation
■Treatment Flow
Measurement
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit:WO0006317 Owner-Facility: Colonial Pipeline Company
Inspection Date: 11/04/2005 Inspection Type:Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit:Routine
• Type Yes No NA NE
Reuse(Quality) 0
Infiltration System 0
Single Family Spray, LR ❑
Activated Sludge Spray,LR ❑
Activated Sludge Spray,HR 0
Recycle/Reuse 0
Activated Sludge Drip,LR 0
Single Family Drip n
Lagoon Spray,LR •
Treatment Yes No NA NE
Are Treatment facilities consistent with those outlined in the current permit? ■ n ❑ n
Do all treatment units appear to be operational?(if no,note below.) ■ n ❑ n
Comment:
Treatment Flow Measurement-Influent Yes No NA NE
Is flowmeter calibrated annually? n n n ■
is flowmeter operating properly? n n n ■
Does flowmeter monitor continuously? 0 0 0 •
Does flowmeter record flow? n ❑ ❑ ■
Does flowmeter appear to monitor accurately? 0 0 0 ■
Comment:
Treatment Flow Measurement-Water Use Records Yes No NA NE
Is water use metered? ❑ ❑ U ❑
Are the daily average values properly calculated? 0 0 ■ 0
Comment:
Treatment Flow Measurement-Effluent Yes No NA NE
Is flowmeter calibrated annually? 0 0 0 •
Is flowmeter operating properly? 0 0 0 ■
Does flowmeter monitor continuously? 0 0 0 •
Does flowmeter record flow? prin .
Does flowmeter appear to monitor accurately? n n n ■
•
Page: 3

Permit:W00006317 Owner-Facility:Colonial Pipeline Company
Inspection Date: 11/04/2005 Inspection Type:Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit:Routine
Comment: The review period for monitoring data was October 2004 to September
2005. Effluent sampling data was not reported on July 2005. This data was available
for the inspection. The July 2005 NDMR should be amended to include this data. The
permitted hourly application rate for field #2 has been at 0.162 inches (the permitted
hourly rate is 0.15 inches.) The annual soil sample was reported 11/30/04. Method 602
is being used for VOC's.
End Use-Irrigation Yes No NA NE
Are buffers adequate? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the cover crop type specified in permit? 0 • 0 0
Is the crop cover acceptable? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the site condition adequate? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the site free of runoff/ponding? U ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the acreage specified in the permit being utilized? U ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the application equipment present? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the application equipment operational? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Is the disposal field free of limiting slopes? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Is access restricted and/or signs posted during active site use? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are any supply wells within the CB? 0 • 0 0
Are any supply wells within 250' of the CB? 0 0 0 •
How close is the closest water supply well? 0 0 0 •
Is municipal water available in the area? • ❑ ❑ ❑
#Info only: Does the permit call for monitoring wells? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Are GW monitoring wells located properly w/respect to RB and CB? 0 0 ❑ ■
Are GW monitoring wells properly constructed,including screened interval? 0 0 0 ■
Are monitoring wells damaged? ❑ ■ 0 ❑
Comment: Application area was found to be in good condition.
001
Treatment Lagoons Yes No NA NE
Lagoon Type Aerated
Primary/Secondary Primary
Influent structure U ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Page: 5

Permit:WO0006317 Owner-Facility:Colonial Pipeline Company
Inspection Date: 11/04/2005 Inspection Type:Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit:Routine
Comment:
Lagoon cover 0 0 0
Comment:
Page: 7

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. Date: 07-Dec-05
CLIENT: Colonial Pipeline Company Client Sample ID: COMPOSITE# 1 (SPRAY FIEL
Project: Spray Field Composite Collection Date: 11/30/2005 10:00:00 AM
Lab ID: 0512030-001 Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Reporting Qual Units BatchlD Dilution Date Analyzed
Limit Factor
METALS,TOTAL SW6010B (SW3050B) Analyst: EM
Antimony BRL 4.80 mg/Kg 64971 1 12/5/2005 10:29 AM
Arsenic 13.5 4.80 mg/Kg 64971 1 12/5/2005 10:29 AM
Cadmium BRL 2.40 mg/Kg 64971 1 12/5/2005 10:29 AM
Calcium 1880 48.0 mg/Kg 64971 1 12/5/2005 10:29 AM
Lead 15.1 4.80 mg/Kg 64971 1 12/5/2005 10:29 AM
Magnesium 1560 480 mg/Kg 64971 10 12/5/2005 11:35 AM
Nickel 8.23 4.80 mg/Kg 64971 1 12/5/2005 10:29 AM
Sodium 983 96.1 mg/Kg 64971 1 12/5/2005 10:29 AM
LABORATORY PH SW9045C (SW9045C) Analyst: LW
pH 07.67 0.01 pH Units 65043 1 12/5/2005 12:20 PM
SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE SW9050 (SW9050) Analyst: ML
Specific Conductivity 1300 100 pmhos/cm 64950 1 12/2/2005 3:00 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level E Estimated(Value above quantitation range)
BRL Below Reporting Limit S Surrogate Recovery outside accepted recovery limits
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded Narr See Case Narrative
N Analyte not NELAC certified NC Not Confirmed
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank Page 1 of 3

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. Date: 07-Dec-05
CLIENT: Colonial Pipeline Company Client Sample ID: COMPOSITE#2(SPRAY FIEL
Project: Spray Field Composite Collection Date: 11/30/2005 1 1:10:00 AM
Lab ID: 0512030-002 Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Reporting Qual Units BatchID Dilution Date Analyzed
Limit Factor
METALS,TOTAL SW6010B (SW3050B) Analyst: EM
Antimony BRL 4.82 mg/Kg 64971 1 12/5/2005 10:42 AM
Arsenic 13.4 4.82 mg/Kg 64971 1 12/5/2005 10:42 AM
Cadmium BRL 2.41 mg/Kg 64971 1 12/5/2005 10:42 AM
Calcium 2100 48.2 mg/Kg 64971 1 12/5/2005 10:42 AM
Lead 18.0 4.82 mg/Kg 64971 1 12/5/2005 10:42 AM
Magnesium 916 48.2 mg/Kg 64971 1 12/5/2005 10:42 AM
Nickel 8.32 4.82 mg/Kg 64971 1 12/5/2005 10:42 AM
Sodium 343 96.3 mg/Kg 64971 1 12/5/2005 10:42 AM
LABORATORY PH SW9045C (SW9045C) Analyst: LW
pH 08.03 0.01 pH Units 65043 1 12/5/2005 12:20 PM
SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE SW9050 (SW9050) Analyst: ML
Specific Conductivity 1190 100 mhos/cm 64950 1 12/2/2005 3:00 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level E Estimated(Value above quantitation range)
BRL Below Reporting Limit S Surrogate Recovery outside accepted recovery limits
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded Narr See Case Narrative
N Analyte not NELAC certified NC Not Confirmed
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank Page 2 of 3

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. Date: 07-Dec-05
CLIENT: Colonial Pipeline Company Client Sample ID: COMPOSITE#3 (SPRAY FIEL
Project: Spray Field Composite Collection Date: 11/30/2005 12:05:00 PM
Lab ID: 0512030-003 Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Reporting Qual Units BatchlD Dilution Date Analyzed
Limit Factor
METALS,TOTAL SW6010B (SW3050B) Analyst: EM
Antimony BRL 4.92 mg/Kg 64971 1 12/5/2005 10:46 AM
Arsenic 12.1 4.92 mg/Kg 64971 1 12/5/2005 10:46 AM
Cadmium BRL 2.46 mg/Kg 64971 1 12/5/2005 10:46 AM
Calcium 4200 492 mg/Kg 64971 10 12/5/2005 11:43 AM
Lead 13.6 4.92 mg/Kg 64971 1 12/5/2005 10:46 AM
Magnesium 1880 492 mg/Kg 64971 10 12/5/2005 11:43 AM
Nickel 7.60 4.92 mg/Kg 64971 1 12/5/2005 10:46 AM
Sodium 501 98.4 mg/Kg 64971 1 12/5/2005 10:46 AM
LABORATORY PH SW9045C (SW9045C) Analyst: LW
pH 08.11 0.01 pH Units 65043 1 12/5/2005 12:20 PM
SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE SW9050 (SW9050) Analyst: ML
Specific Conductivity 1140 100 pmhos/cm 64950 1 12/2/2005 3:00 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level E Estimated(Value above quantitation range)
BRL Below Reporting Limit S Surrogate Recovery outside accepted recovery limits
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded Nan See Case Narrative
N Analyte not NELAC certified NC Not Confirmed
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank Page 3 of 3

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. Date: 07-Dec-05
CLIENT: Colonial Pipeline Company Client Sample ID: COMPOSITE# 1 (SPRAY FIEL
Project: Spray Field Composite Collection Date: 11/30/2005 10:00:00 AM
Lab ID: 0512030-001 Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Reporting Qual Units BatchiD Dilution Date Analyzed
Limit Factor
METALS,TOTAL SW6010B (SW3050B) Analyst: EM
Antimony BRL 4.80 mg/Kg 64971 1 12/5/2005 10:29 AM
Arsenic 13.5 4.80 mg/Kg 64971 1 12/5/2005 10:29 AM
Cadmium BRL 2.40 mg/Kg 64971 1 12/5/2005 10:29 AM
Calcium 1880 48.0 mg/Kg 64971 1 12/5/2005 10:29 AM
Lead 15.1 4.80 mg/Kg 64971 1 12/5/2005 10:29 AM
Magnesium 1560 480 mg/Kg 64971 10 12/5/2005 11:35 AM
Nickel 8.23 4.80 mg/Kg 64971 1 12/5/2005 10:29 AM
Sodium 983 96.1 mg/Kg 64971 1 12/5/2005 10:29 AM
LABORATORY PH SW9045C (SW9045C) Analyst: LW
pH 07.67 0.01 pH Units 65043 1 12/5/2005 12:20 PM
SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE SW9050 (SW9050) Analyst: ML
Specific Conductivity 1300 100 pmhos/cm 64950 1 12/2/2005 3:00 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level E Estimated(Value above quantitation range)
BRL Below Reporting Limit S Surrogate Recovery outside accepted recovery limits
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded Narr See Case Narrative
N Analyte not NELAC certified NC Not Confirmed
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank Page 1 of 3

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. Date: 07-Deg-05
CLIENT: Colonial Pipeline Company Client Sample ID: COMPOSITE#2(SPRAY FIEL
Project: Spray Field Composite Collection Date: 11/30/2005 1 1:10:00 AM
Lab ID: 0512030-002 Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Reporting Qual Units BatchlD Dilution Date Analyzed
Limit Factor
METALS,TOTAL SW6010B (SW3050B) Analyst: EM
Antimony BRL 4.82 mg/Kg 64971 1 12/5/2005 10:42 AM
Arsenic 13.4 4.82 mg/Kg 64971 1 12/5/2005 10:42 AM
Cadmium BRL 2.41 mg/Kg 64971 1 12/5/2005 10:42 AM
Calcium 2100 48.2 mg/Kg 64971 1 12/5/2005 10:42 AM
Lead 18.0 4.82 mg/Kg 64971 1 12/5/2005 10:42 AM
Magnesium 916 48.2 mg/Kg 64971 1 12/5/2005 10:42 AM
Nickel 8.32 4.82 mg/Kg 64971 1 12/5/2005 10:42 AM
Sodium 343 96.3 mg/Kg 64971 1 12/5/2005 10:42 AM
LABORATORY PH SW9045C (SW9045C) Analyst: LW
pH 08.03 0.01 pH Units 65043 1 12/5/2005 12:20 PM
SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE SW9050 (SW9050) Analyst: ML
Specific Conductivity 1190 100 pmhos/cm 64950 1 12/2/2005 3:00 PM
•
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level E Estimated(Value above quantitation range)
BRL Below Reporting Limit S Surrogate Recovery outside accepted recovery limits
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded Narr See Case Narrative
N Analvte not NELAC certified NC Not Confirmed
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank Page 2 of 3

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. Date: 07-Dec-OS
CLIENT: Colonial Pipeline Company Client Sample ID: COMPOSITE#3 (SPRAY FIEL
Project: Spray Field Composite Collection Date: 11/30/2005 12:05:00 PM
Lab ID: 0512030-003 Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Reporting Qual Units BatchlD Dilution Date Analyzed
Limit Factor
METALS,TOTAL SW6010B (SW3050B) Analyst: EM
Antimony BRL 4.92 mg/Kg 64971 1 12/5/2005 10:46 AM
Arsenic 12.1 4.92 mg/Kg 64971 1 12/5/2005 10:46 AM
Cadmium BRL 2.46 mg/Kg 64971 1 12/5/2005 10:46 AM
Calcium 4200 492 mg/Kg 64971 10 12/5/2005 11:43 AM
Lead 13.6 4.92 mg/Kg 64971 1 12/5/2005 10:46 AM
Magnesium 1880 492 mg/Kg 64971 10 12/5/2005 11:43 AM
Nickel 7.60 4.92 mg/Kg 64971 1 12/5/2005 10:46 AM
Sodium 501 98.4 mg/Kg 64971 1 12/5/2005 10:46 AM
LABORATORY PH SW9045C (SW9045C) Analyst: LW
pH 08.11 0.01 pH Units 65043 1 12/5/2005 12:20 PM
SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE SW9050 (SW9050) Analyst: ML
Specific Conductivity 1140 100 pmhos/cm 64950 1 12/2/2005 3:00 PM
Qualifiers: * Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level E Estimated(Value above quantitation range)
BRL Below Reporting Limit S Surrogate Recovery outside accepted recovery limits
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded Narr See Case Narrative
N Analyte not NELAC certified NC Not Confirmed
B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank Page 3 of 3

Colonial Pipeline Company
Creating Excellence in Transportation Services
•
FARON D. LEIGH • Telephone: [phone]
Environmental Technician dmSimile: 336-294-3192
Wednesday,December 29,2004
NCDENR --
RECFIVr)
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Water Quality Section DEC 3 0 2004
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem,NC 27107 ,Regional Office
Subject: Spray Irrigation Permit No.—WQ0006317
Colonial Pipeline Company—Greensboro, Guilford County
Annual Composite Spray Field Soil Analyticals
Enclosed are two (2) copies of the analytical results from our annual soil-sampling event. If you have any
questions or require any additional information, please contact me at the letterhead address or at(336) 294-
9737. Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
ems^- 6- r
Faron D. Leigh
cc: Jeff W. Richards, CPC District Environmental Project Mgr. (w/enclosures)
411 Gallimore Dairy Road Greensboro,North Carolina 27409

ilt-----
Analytical Environmental Services,Inc. Date: 22-Dec-04
CLIENT: Colonial Pipeline Company • Client Sample ID: COMPOSITE#1 (SPRAY FIEL
Lab Order: 0412795 Collection Date: 11/30/2004 1:10:00 PM
Project: Spray Field Composite
Lab ID: 0412795-001 Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Limit Qual Units BatchID LW Date Analyzed
METALS,TOTAL 8W60108 (8W3050B) Analyst: TH
Antimony BRL 4.82 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/15/2004 6:35:22 P
Arsenic 12.8 4.82 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/16/2004 11:47:07 1
Cadmium BRL 2.41 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/15/2004 6:35:22 P
Calcium 1310 48.2 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/15/2004 6:35:22 P
Lead 16.0 4.82 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/15/2004 6:35:22 P
Magnesium 724 48.2 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/15/2004 6:35:22 P
Nickel BRL 4.82 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/15/2004 6:35:22 P _
Sodium 556 96.3 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/15/2004 6:35:22 P
LABORATORY PH SW9045C (8W9045C) Analyst: LW
pH 07.65 0.01 pH Units 52982 1 12/16/2004 8:30:00 A
SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE SW9050 (8W9050) Analyst: ML
Specific Conductivity 1060 100 pmhos/cm 52898 1 12/21/2004 9:00:00 A
•
Qualifiers: • Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
BRL Below Reporting Limit E Value above quantitation range
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits
N Analyte not NELAC certified P NELAC analyte certification pending Page 1 of 3
Rpt Limit Reporting Limit S Spike Recovery outside accepted recovery limits

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. Date: 22-Dec-04
CLIENT: Colonial Pipeline Company Client Sample ID: COMPOSITE#2(SPRAY FIEL
Lab Order: 0412795 Collection Date: 11/30/2004 2:00:00 PM
Project: Spray Field Composite
Lab ID: 0412795-002 Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Chit Qual Units BatchiD DF Date Analyzed
METALS,TOTAL SW6010B (SW3050B) Analyst: TH
Antimony BRL 3.80 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/15/2004 6:38:47 P
Arsenic 13.4 3.80 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/16/2004 11:49:29 I
Cadmium BRL 1.90 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/15/2004 6:38:47 P
Calcium 1570 38.0 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/15/2004 6:38:47 P
Lead 13.4 3.80 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/15/2004 6:38:47 P
Magnesium 520 38.0 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/15/2004 6:38:47 P
Nickel 4.54 3.80 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/15/2004 6:38:47 P
Sodium 293 76.1 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/15/2004 6:38:47 P
LABORATORY PH SW9045C (SW9045C) Analyst: LW
pH 07.85 0.01 pH Units 52982 1 12/16/2004 8:30:00 A
SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE SW9050 (SW9050) Analyst: ML
Specific Conductivity 849 100 pmhos/cm 52898 1 12/21/2004 9:00:00 A
Qualifiers: ' Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
BRL Below Reporting Limit E Value above quantitation range
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits
N Analyte not NELAC certified P NELAC analyte certification pending Page 2 of 3
Rpt Limit Reporting Limit S Spike Recovery outside accepted recovery limits

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. Date: 22-Dec-04
CLIENT: Colonial Pipeline Company •
Client Sample ID: COMPOSITE#3(SPRAY FIEL
Lab Order: 0412795 Collection Date: 11/30/2004 2:45:00 PM
Project: Spray Field Composite
Lab ID: 0412795-003 Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Limit Qua' Units BatchlD DF Date Analyzed
METALS,TOTAL SW6010B (SW3050B) Analyst: TH
Antimony BRL 4.17 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/15/2004 6:42:11 P
Arsenic 14.1 4.17 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/16/2004 11:51:51 I
Cadmium BRL 2.08 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/15/2004 6:42:11 P
Calcium 1730 41.7 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/15/2004 6:42:11 P
Lead 22.4 4.17 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/15/2004 6:42:11 P
Magnesium 664 41.7 mg/Kg 52807 1 12/15/2004 6:42:11 P
Nickel 4.76 4.17 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/15/2004 6:42:11 P
Sodium 397 83.4 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/15/2004 6:42:11 P
LABORATORY PH SW9045C (SW9045C) Analyst: LW
pH 07.85 0.01 pH Units 52982 1 12/16/2004 8:30:00 A
SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE SW90S0 (SW9050) Analyst: ML
Specific Conductivity 1150 100 pmhos/cm 52898 1 12/21/2004 9:00:00 A
Qualifiers: • Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
BRL Below Reporting Limit E Value above quantitation range
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits
N Analyte not NELAC certified P NELAC analyte certification pending Page 3 of 3
Rpt Limit Reporting Limit S Spike Recovery outside accepted recovery limits

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. Date: 22-Dec-04
CLIENT: Colonial Pipeline Company •
Client Sample ID: COMPOSITE#1 (SPRAY FIEL
Lab Order: 0412795 Collection Date: 11/30/2004 1:10:00 PM
Project: Spray Field Composite
Lab ID: 0412795-001 Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Limit Quail Units BatchlD DF Date Analyzed
METALS,TOTAL SW601013 (SW3050B) Analyst: TH
Antimony BRL 4.82 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/15/2004 6:35:22 P
Arsenic 12.8 4.82 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/16/2004 11:47:07,
Cadmium BRL 2.41 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/15/2004 6:35:22 P
Calcium 1310 48.2 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/15/2004 6:35:22 P
Lead 16.0 4.82 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/15/2004 6:35:22 P
Magnesium 724 48.2 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/15/2004 6:35:22 P
Nickel BRL 4.82 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/15/2004 6:35:22 P .
Sodium 556 96.3 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/15/2004 6:35:22 P
LABORATORY PH SW9045C (SW9045C) Analyst: LW
pH 07.65 0.01 pH Units 52982 1 12/16/2004 8:30:00 A
SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE SW9050 (SW9050) Analyst: ML
Specific Conductivity 1060 100 pmhos/cm 52898 1 12/21/2004 9:00:00 A
Qualifiers: ' Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
BRL Below Reporting Limit E Value above quantitation range
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded I Analyte detected below quantitation limits
N Analyte not NELAC certified P NELAC analyte certification pending Page 1 of 3
Rpt Limit Reporting Limit S Spike Recovery outside accepted recovery limits

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. Date: 22-Dec-04
CLIENT: Colonial Pipeline Company Client Sample ID: COMPOSITE#2(SPRAY FIEL
Lab Order: 0412795 Collection Date: 11/30/2004 2:00:00 PM
Project: Spray Field Composite
. Lab ID: 0412795-002 Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Limit Qual Units BatchlD DF Date Analyzed
METALS,TOTAL SW6010B (SW3050B) Analyst: TH
Antimony BRL 3.80 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/15/2004 6:38:47 P
Arsenic 13.4 3.80 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/16/2004 11:49:29,
Cadmium BRL 1.90 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/15/2004 6:38:47 P
Calcium 1570 38.0 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/15/2004 6:38:47 P
Lead 13.4 3.80 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/15/2004 6:38:47 P
Magnesium 520 38.0 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/15/2004 6:38:47 P
Nickel 4.54 3.80 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/15/2004 6:38:47 P
Sodium 293 76.1 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/15/2004 6:38:47 P
LABORATORY PH SW9045C (SW9045C) Analyst: LW
pH 07.85 0.01 pH Units 52982 1 12/16/2004 8:30:00 A
SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE SW9050 (SW9050) Analyst: ML
Specific Conductivity 849 100 pmhos/cm 52898 1 12/21/2004 9:00:00 A
Qualifiers: • Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level B Analyze detected in the associated Method Blank
BRL Below Reporting Limit E Value above quantitation range
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits
N Analyte not NELAC certified P NELAC analyte certification pending Page 2 of 3
Rpt Limit Reporting Limit S Spike Recovery outside accepted recovery limits

Analytical Environmental Services, Inc. Date: 22-Dec-04
CLIENT: Colonial Pipeline Company Client Sample ID: COMPOSITE#3(SPRAY FIEL
Lab Order: 0412795 Collection Date: 11/30/2004 2:45:00 PM
Project: Spray Field Composite
Lab ID: 0412795-003 Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Lmit Qual Units BatchlD DF Date Analyzed
METALS,TOTAL SW6010B (SW3050B) Analyst: TH
Antimony BRL 4.17 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/15/2004 6:42:11 P
Arsenic 14.1 4.17 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/16/2004 11:51:51
Cadmium BRL 2.08 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/15/2004 6:42:11 P
Calcium 1730 41.7 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/15/2004 6:42:11 P
Lead 22.4 4.17 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/15/2004 6:42:11 P
Magnesium 664 41.7 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/15/2004 6:42:11 P
Nickel 4.76 4.17 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/15/2004 6:42:11 P
Sodium 397 83.4 mg/Kg 52907 1 12/15/2004 6:42:11 P
LABORATORY PH SW9045C (SW9045C) Analyst: LW
pH 07.85 0.01 pH Units 52982 1 12/16/2004 8:30:00 A
SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE SW9050 (8W9050) Analyst: ML
Specific Conductivity 1150 100 pmhos/cm 52898 1 12/21/2004 9:00:00 A
Qualifiers: Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
BRL Below Reporting Limit E Value above quantitation range
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits
N Analyte not NELAC certified P NELAC analyze certification pending
Rpt Limit Reporting Limit S SpikePage 3 of 3
Recovery outside accepted recovery limits

Colonial Pipeline Company
Creating Excellence in Transportation Services
FARON D. LEIGH Telephone: [phone]
Environmental Technician Facsimile: 336-294-3192
Monday,December 22,2003
OPttsAt
NCDENR tk ,®ep
Winston-Salem Regional Office C 3 ti0�3
Water Quality Section �E.
585 Waughtown Street �`�st Leo e
Winston-Salem,NC 27107 qke
Subject: Spray Irrigation Permit No.—WQ0006317
Colonial Pipeline Company—Greensboro, Guilford County
Annual Composite Spray Field Soil Analyticals
Enclosed are two (2) copies of the analytical results from our annual soil-sampling event. If you have any
questions or require any additional information, please contact me at the letterhead address or at(336) 294-
9737. Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
Faron D. Leigh
cc: Jeff D. Titus, CPC District Environmental Project Mgr. (w/enclosures)
411 Gallimore Dairy Road Greensboro,North Carolina 27409

Analytical Environmental Servs, Inc. Date: 10-Dec-03
CLIENT: Colonial Pipeline Company • Client Sample ID: COMPOSITE#1(SPRAY FIEL
Lab Order: 0311783 Collection Date: 11/21/2003 11:00:00 AM
Project: Spray Field Composite
Lab ID: 0311783-001 Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Limit Qual Units DF Date Analyzed
METALS,TOTAL SW6010B Analyst: CDW
Antimony BRL 4.84 mg/Kg 1 11/26/2003 11:59:00 AM
Arsenic 15.2 4.84 mg/Kg 1 11/26/2003 11:59:00 AM
Cadmium BRL 2.42 mg/Kg '1 11/26/2003 11:59:00 AM
Calcium 1340 48.4 mg/Kg 1 11/26/2003 11:59:00 AM
Lead 19.3 4.84 mg/Kg 1 11/26/2003 11:59:00 AM
Magnesium 953 . 48.4 mg/Kg 1 11/26/2003 11:59:00 AM
Nickel BRL 4.84 mg/Kg 1 11/26/2003 11:59:00 AM
Sodium 1110 96.9 mg/Kg 1 11/26/2003 11:59:00 AM
LABORATORY PH SW9045C Analyst: TS •
pH 07.75 0.01 pH Units 1 12/9/2003 12:20:00 PM
SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE SW9050 Analyst: ML
Specific Conductivity 3050 1000 pmhos/cm 10 12/8/2003 2:30:00 PM
•
•
Qualifiers: • Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
BRL Below Reporting Limit E Value above quantitation range
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded I Analyte detected below quantitation limits
N Analyte not NELAC certified P NELAC analyte certification pending,
Rpt Limit Reporting Limit S Spike Recovery outside accepted recovery l mof3

Analytical Environmental Servs, Inc. Date: 10-Dec-03
CLIENT: Colonial Pipeline Company •
Client Sample ID: COMPOSITE#1(SPRAY FEEL
Lab Order: 0311783 Collection Date: 11/21/2003 11:00:00 AM
Project: Spray Field Composite
Lab ID: 03 1 1 783-001 Matrix: SOIL
•
Analyses Result Limit Qual Units DF Date Analyzed
METALS,TOTAL SW6010B Analyst: CDW
Antimony BRL 4.84 mg/Kg 1 11/26/2003 11:59:00 AM
Arsenic 15.2 4.84 mg/Kg 1 11/26/2003 11:59:00 AM
Cadmium BRL 2.42 mg/Kg '1 11/26/2003 11:59:00 AM
Calcium 1340 48.4 mg/Kg 1 11/26/2003 11:59:00 AM
Lead 19.3 4.84 mg/Kg 1 11/26/2003 11:59:00 AM
Magnesium 953 . 48.4 mg/Kg 1 11/26/2003 11:59:00 AM
Nickel BRL 4.84 mg/Kg 1 11/26/2003 11:59:00 AM
Sodium 1110 96.9 mg/Kg 1 11/26/2003 11:59:00 AM
LABORATORY PH SW9045C Analyst: TS
pH 07.75 0.01 pH Units 1 12/9/2003 12:20:00 PM
SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE SW9050 Analyst: ML
Specific Conductivity 3050 1000 pmhos/cm 10 12/8/2003 2:30:00 PM
Qualifiers: • Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level B Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank
BRL Below Reporting Limit E Value above quantitation range
H Holding times for preparation or analysis exceeded J Analyte detected below quantitation limits
N Analyte not NELAC certified P NELAC analyte certification pending_
Rpt Limit Reporting Limit S Spike Recovery outside accepted rec very l ge m 3 it

83-- k% t CIS
Colonial Pipeline Company
Creating Excellence in Transportation Services
FARON D. LEIGH Telephone: [phone]
Environmental Technician Facsimile: 336-294-3192
Monday,January 27,2003
R Jr!V D
NCDENR
Winston-Salem Regional Office JAI 2 9 2003
Water Quality Section
585 Waughtown Street -Salem
Winston-Salem, NC 27107 F - c,riai Office
Subject: Spray Irrigation Permit No. —WQ0006317
Colonial Pipeline Company—Greensboro, Guilford County
Annual Composite Spray Field Soil Analyticals
Enclosed are two(2) copies of the analytical results from our annual soil-sampling event. If you have any
questions or require any additional information, please contact me at the letterhead address or at(336)294-
9737. Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
Faron D. Leigh
cc: Jeff D. Titus, CPC District Environmental Project Mgr. (w/enclosures)
411 Gallimore Dairy Road Greensboro,North Carolina 27409

•
Analytical Environmental Servs, Inc. Date: 18-Dec-02
CLIENT: Colonial Pipeline Client Sample ID: COMPOSITE#1
Lab Order: 0212039 Collection Date: 11/29/02 10:30:00 AM
Project: Spray System
Lab ID: 0212039-001 Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Limit Qual Units DF Date Analyzed
METALS,TOTAL SW6010B Analyst: CDW
Antimony BRL 4.35 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:11:00 PM
Arsenic 15.0 4.35 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:11:00 PM
Cadmium BRL 2.17 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:11:00 PM
Calcium 1030 43.5 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:11:00 PM
Lead 14.0 4.35 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:11:00 PM
Magnesium 1080 43.5 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:11:00 PM
Nickel 8.00 4.35 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:11:00 PM
Sodium 1100 86.9 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:11:00 PM
SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE E120.1 Analyst: MO
Specific Conductance 525 10.0 pmhos/cm 1 12/17/02 11:30:00 AM
LABORATORY PH SW9045C Analyst: MO
pH 07.34 0.01 pH Units 1 12/9/02 6:58:00 PM
Qualifiers: BRL-Below Reporting Limit S-Spike Recovery outside accepted recovery limits
J-Analyte detected below quanititation limits R-RPD outside accepted recovery limits
B-Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E-Value above quantitation range
*-Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level Page 1 of 3

Analytical Environmental Servs, Inc. Date: 18-Dec-02
CLIENT: Colonial Pipeline Client Sample ID: COMPOSITE#2
•
Lab Order: 0212039 Collection Date: 11/29/02 11:15:00 AM
Project: Spray System
Lab ID: 0212039-002 Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Limit Qual Units DF Date Analyzed
METALS,TOTAL SW6010B Analyst: CDW
Antimony BRL 3.03 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:25:00 PM
Arsenic 18.2 3.03 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:25:00 PM
Cadmium BRL 1.51 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:25:00 PM
Calcium 814 30.3 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:25:00 PM
Lead 11.6 3.03 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:25:00 PM
Magnesium 821 30.3 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:25:00 PM
Nickel 5.24 3.03 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:25:00 PM
Sodium 900 60.5 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:25:00 PM
SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE E120.1 Analyst: MO
Specific Conductance 394 10.0 pmhos/cm 1 12/17/02 11:30:00 AM
LABORATORY PH SW9045C Analyst: MO
pH 07.53 0.01 pH Units 1 12/9/02 7:01:00 PM
Qualifiers: BRL-Below Reporting Limit S-Spike Recovery outside accepted recovery limits
J-Analyte detected below quanititation limits R-RPD outside accepted recovery limits
B-Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E-Value above quantitation range
*-Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level Page 2 of 3

Analytical Environmental Servs, Inc. Date: 18-Dec-02
CLIENT: Colonial Pipeline Client Sample ID: COMPOSITE#3
Lab Order: 0212039 Collection Date: 11/29/02 12:00:00 PM
Project: Spray System
Lab ID: 0212039-003 Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Limit Qual Units DF Date Analyzed
METALS,TOTAL SW6010B Analyst: CDW
Antimony BRL 2.84 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:30:00 PM
Arsenic 14.5 2.84 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:30:00 PM
Cadmium BRL 1.42 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:30:00 PM
Calcium 1080 28.4 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:30:00 PM
Lead 12.7 2.84 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:30:00 PM
Magnesium 1170 28.4 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:30:00 PM
Nickel 6.83 2.84 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:30:00 PM
Sodium 1190 56.9 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:30:00 PM
SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE E120.1 Analyst: MO
Specific Conductance 524 10.0 pmhos/cm 1 12/17/02 11:30:00 AM
LABORATORY PH SW9045C Analyst: MO
pH 07.72 0.01 pH Units 1 12/9/02 7:05:00 PM
Qualifiers: BRL-Below Reporting Limit S-Spike Recovery outside accepted recovery limits
J-Analyte detected below quanititation limits R-RPD outside accepted recovery limits
B-Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E-Value above quantitation range
*-Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level Page 3 of 3

Analytical Environmental Servs, Inc. Date: 18-Dec-02
CLIENT: Colonial Pipeline Client Sample ID: COMPOSITE#1
Lab Order: 0212039 Collection Date: 11/29/02 10:30:00 AM
Project: Spray System
Lab ID: 0212039-001 Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Limit Qual Units DF Date Analyzed
METALS, TOTAL SW6010B Analyst: CDW
Antimony BRL 4.35 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:11:00 PM
Arsenic 15.0 4.35 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:11:00 PM
Cadmium BRL 2.17 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:11:00 PM
Calcium 1030 43.5 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:11:00 PM
Lead 14.0 4.35 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:11:00 PM
Magnesium 1080 43.5 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:11:00 PM
Nickel 8.00 4.35 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:11:00 PM
Sodium 1100 86.9 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:11:00 PM
SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE E120.1 Analyst: MO
Specific Conductance 525 10.0 pmhos/cm 1 12/17/02 11:30:00 AM
LABORATORY PH SW9045C Analyst: MO
pH 07.34 0.01 pH Units 1 12/9/02 6:58:00 PM
Qualifiers: BRL-Below Reporting Limit S-Spike Recovery outside accepted recovery limits
J-Analyte detected below quanititation limits R-RPD outside accepted recovery limits
B-Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E-Value above quantitation range
*-Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level Page 1 of 3

Analytical Environmental Servs, Inc. Date: 18-Dec-02
CLIENT: Colonial Pipeline Client Sample ID: COMPOSITE#2
Lab Order: 0212039 Collection Date: 11/29/02 11:15:00 AM
Project: Spray System
Lab ID: 0212039-002 Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Limit Qual Units DF Date Analyzed
METALS,TOTAL SW6010B Analyst: CDW
Antimony BRL 3.03 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:25:00 PM
Arsenic 18.2 3.03 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:25:00 PM
Cadmium BRL 1.51 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:25:00 PM
Calcium 814 30.3 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:25:00 PM
Lead 11.6 3.03 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:25:00 PM
Magnesium 821 30.3 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:25:00 PM
Nickel 5.24 3.03 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:25:00 PM -
Sodium 900 60.5 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:25:00 PM
SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE E120.1 Analyst: MO
Specific Conductance 394 10.0 pmhos/cm 1 12/17/02 11:30:00 AM
LABORATORY PH SW9045C Analyst: MO
pH 07.53 0.01 pH Units 1 12/9/02 7:01:00 PM
Qualifiers: BRL-Below Reporting Limit S-Spike Recovery outside accepted recovery limits
.1-Analyte detected below quanititation limits R-RPD outside accepted recovery limits
B-Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E-Value above quantitation range
*-Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level Page 2 of 3

Analytical Environmental Servs, Inc. Date: 18-Dec-02
CLIENT: Colonial Pipeline Client Sample ID: COMPOSITE#3
Lab Order: 0212039 Collection Date: 11/29/02 12:00:00 PM
Project: Spray System
Lab ID: 0212039-003 Matrix: SOIL
Analyses Result Limit Qual Units DF Date Analyzed
METALS,TOTAL SW6010B Analyst: CDW
Antimony BRL 2.84 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:30:00 PM
Arsenic 14.5 2.84 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:30:00 PM
Cadmium BRL 1.42 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:30:00 PM
Calcium 1080 28.4 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:30:00 PM
Lead 12.7 2.84 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:30:00 PM
Magnesium 1170 28.4 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:30:00 PM
Nickel 6.83 2.84 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:30:00 PM
Sodium 1190 56.9 mg/Kg 1 12/6/02 4:30:00 PM
SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCE E120.1 Analyst: MO
Specific Conductance 524 10.0 pmhos/cm 1 12/17/02 11:30:00 AM
LABORATORY PH SW9045C Analyst: MO
pH 07.72 0.01 pH Units 1 12/9/02 7:05:00 PM
Qualifiers: BRL-Below Reporting Limit S-Spike Recovery outside accepted recovery limits
J-Analyte detected below quanititation limits R-RPD outside accepted recovery limits
B-Analyte detected in the associated Method Blank E-Value above quantitation range
*-Value exceeds Maximum Contaminant Level Page 3 of 3

Michael F.Easley,Governor
ATFq William G.Ross Jr.,Secretary
O QG North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
rij - Alan W.Klimek,P.E.Director
_ Division of Water Quality
January 8, 2003
Mr. Faron Leigh
Colonial Pipeline Company
411 Gallimore Dairy Road
Greensboro,NC 27419
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Colonial Pipeline Company - Greensboro Terminal
Spray Irrigation Permit No.WQ0006317
Guilford County
Dear Mr.Leigh:
A Compliance Evaluation Inspection was performed on the Colonial Pipeline Company-Greensboro Terminal
on October 2,2002 by Jenny Rankin of the Winston-Salem Regional Office. You represented the facility for
the inspection. The inspection consisted of two parts: an on-site inspection of the treatment facility and a file
review. Attached is the inspection report.
The spray irrigation permit is in the process of being modified. The new permit will make the permit
consistent with the wastewater treatment units on-site. If you have any questions regarding this report,please
contact me at 336-771-4600.
Sincerely,
Steve Mauney
Acting Regional Water Quality Supervisor
cc: eininal
Central Files
N.C.Division of Water Quality/Water Quality Section 585 Waughtown Street Winston-Salem,NC 27107 [phone] Customer Service
1 800 623-7748

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: WQ0006317 Effective: 07/15/97 Expiration: 06/30/02 Owner: Colonial Pipeline Company
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: Greensboro Terminal
County: Guilford 411 Gallimore Dairy Road
Region: Winston-Salem
Greensboro NC 27409
Contact Person: Faron D.Leigh Phone: [phone] Ext.
Directions to Facility:
Primary ORC: Faron D.Leigh Certification: 14891 Phone: [phone] Ext.
Secondary ORC(s):
On-Site Representative(s):
24 hour contact name Faron Leigh Phone: [phone] Ext.
On-site representative Faron Leigh Phone: [phone] Ext.
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 10/02/2002 Entry Time: 10:00 AM Exit Time: 12:00 AM
Primary Inspector Jennifer K Rankin Phone: [phone] Ext.
Secondary Inspector(s):
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation(non-sampling)
Permit Inspection Type: Surface Irrigation
Facility Status: 11 Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Inspection Summary:
Permit is in the process of being modified. It will be consistent upon modification.
Page: 1

1
el
z ° 0 000000 ❑ 0 0 0000000000 �Z 00000000
z o 0 ■ ■ O ■ ■ ■ 00 ■ 0000000000 z 00000000
a
z c 0 000000 DOD 0000000000 z 00000000
L < A ■ O O ■ O ❑ O ■ ■ O ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ t ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■
74
G
F
0
A b,
H
U ;
c
u
. .-
'o
o E
0 o
U U
U F
L. 0 E
o u
O c -0 53
u
E c• c. o.
o G p . c•
r v
>, 0 3 F. o• E
My 4.)
w u a,
S c. •G > c "/ , v Q
r- V. l' V. a u E E -6 0 Z -. v
i
�.lEV' c. 7' GN •n g0 a u c s f v 'v .o n v .. v �? .1 ._., cl co 1 `° 0 5• 7 ,; c. $ �+ Z o R. P. a, cam' y o yc
3a L Y1 �c N N c .• E 5 c.. co ;o o X.
.
CC "3 cc. �.. c. ca, p • u a cu• A a ` ` u $
-0 $ 0 8Ki c
c. ,_ - va .vu € oE oG u F •v ou 3 i° n S c' ` —
Z a o c E . E , u c o 2i r
11 C' o 8 I . u• 'c 6 co _ Q 0 o LA i- E p E c ° 4 4 Is . e 6 c G c ELZ
C e4 G L G, . ` ° E E 0 ' - 4 z e F > >. '� '6O uu o a-, E no E Q y —
O p n n nu CL C A > al u u O C v 4- a L O E 0 oYu ns. o
. u a o _ $ 0 $ u `g. a E e . a a . 8 Fr, $ -E ouEoEua .6nE P_' 9 Lv
a) N p y
f

E :aoed
:tuawwo3
❑ ❑ 0 I ;,span 3uuouuow to;Ilea uwtad ayt saou:,Cleo o;ui
O 0 0 I aus a.naae 8uunp patsod sues io/pue patautsai ssaaae si
❑ ❑ ❑ I Lsadols SuppupJo oak;plat lesodsIp ayt sl
❑ ❑ 0 I ;,leuoneido tuawdinba uoneogdde atp si
❑ ❑ ❑ I Ltuasatd tuawdtnba uoneaildde alp si
❑ ❑ ❑ I Lpanlnn 3uIaq uuuad aqt w paupads a3eaiae alp si
❑ ❑ ❑ I L3uipuod/;}ount;o aat;aus ayt si
O 0011 Latenbapc uoiupuo aus ayt si
❑ ❑ ❑ I Lalgetdaaae tanoa dam alp si
❑ ❑ 0 • Luuuad ui pagiaads ad.Ct dots tanoa alp si
❑ ❑ 0 I Latenbape sta;;nq atd
3N YN ON saA uonciwl-)Sfl pu3
:tuawwoD
O 0 0 I ;,uonaadsui tsei aaws passcd,Cy shun tuawtean oN
❑ ❑ 0 I Laigepo.se.CI!peat Jos alp Jo ndoa a si
❑ ❑ 0 I Lsytuow z I ts-eI ut siun idwoa aygnd;o aat;uaaq aatuwtad seH
O 0 0 I z.ataidwo,sptopat aJueuatwIW pun leuoneiado ata.M
O 0 0 I ;,tuasaid sptooat aaueuatuiely pun Inuonntado alv
❑ ❑ 0 I ZIUNC IN uo pauodat glop uoddns staays qci oa
❑ ❑ 0 I i,ssat.sat to;aigeliene sways qui atf•
3N b'N oN saA 3uidaaN pto3ab
($ugdwes-uou)uoitenleng aouegdwoj uottaadsul Zo/Zo/OI :a1eQ uouoadsul
Ieu!wtad,oiogsuaato-i(uedwoJ auilad!d IE!uoloD :Utltoeg_tau to LI£9000OM :uuuad

rnor
T F9 William G.Ross Jr Secretary .
OG North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
r Alan W.Klimek,P.E.Director
Pr Division of Water Quality
o -c
September 18, 2002
Ms. Kris Lippert
USEPA Region IV
North Enforcement and Compliance Section
RCRA Enforcement and Compliance Branch
Waste Management Division
61 Forsyth Street
Atlanta,GA 30303
SUBJECT: Colonial Pipeline Company
Spray Irrigation Wastewater Treatment
Permit No.WQ0006317
Greensboro,NC--Guilford County
Dear Ms. Lippert:
This letter is written to summarize our phone conversation on September 13, 2002 concerning Colonial
Pipeline in Greensboro,NC.
Colonial Pipeline currently operates a wastewater treatment system that the State of North Carolina Division
of Water Quality has classified and permitted as a spray irrigation system. This permit is issued by the
Division of Water Quality's non-discharge permitting program. The non-discharge program and the permits
required therein are regulated by the North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the North Carolina
Administrative Code Section 15A NCAC 2H. 02000-Waste Not Discharged to Surface Waters gives the
Division of Water Quality the authority to issue these permits. The program is based on the North Carolina
General Statute (NCGS) 143-215.1(2) which states that construction or operation of any sewer system,
treatment works, or disposal system within the State requires a permit.
Colonial Pipeline's spray irrigation permit covers the treatment of water that has been contaminated by coming
into contact with petroleum product in tanks or pipelines. The components of the current spray irrigation
permit include: a holding tank (actually 12 holding tanks that have a capacity of 210,000 gallons each), an
oil/water separator, an air stripping unit, a 147,000 gallon clay-lined aerated lagoon with two aerators, a
257,000 gallon clay-lined aerated lagoon with five aerators, a 5.6 acre spray field with 24 spray heads and all
appurtenances. A copy of this permit is enclosed.
Colonial Pipeline has applied for a modification of the current spray irrigation permit,but the approval of the
modifications is still pending. The modifications include: changing the number of aerators in the 257,000
gallon lagoon,removing the 147,000gallon lagoon from service,and updating the permit language to indicate
that there are 12 holding tanks instead of lholding tank and only 3.69 acres of spray field with 17 spray heads.
The permit has monitoring requirements and copies of several non-discharge monitoring reports are enclosed
to indicate the level of treatment the wastewater is receiving. The permit also has conditions that any process
unit failure, change in wastewater quantity or characteristics, and/or failure of treatment facility resulting in
a bypass to surface waters requires notification to the Division of Water Quality within 24 hours of the first
knowledge of the occurrence.
17.
RMENR
N.C.Division of Water Quality/Water Quality Section 585 Waughtown Street Winston-Salem, NC 27107 [phone] Customer Service
r y 1 800 623-7748

Colonial Pipeline Company •
Spray Irrigation System
September 18, 2002
Page#2
A question was raised as to whether or not Colonial Pipeline has a Clean Water Act(CWA)Permit and if they
do not,if Colonial Pipeline would qualify for one. A non-discharge permit like the one Colonial Pipeline
currently holds for their spray irrigation system is not a Clean Water Act Permit. In order for Colonial Pipeline
to be covered under a CWA permit, a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit
would have to be issued. NPDES permits are issued for treated wastewater discharges into navigable waters
within the State and are only issued after the completion of an Engineering Alternatives Analysis(EAA). The
EAA is a requirement under North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1(b)(5) and mandates that all other
possible wastewater disposal methods be investigated before an NPDES permit-be issued since the State is
trying to reduce the number of discharges to waters of the State. Since spray irrigation is one of the alternatives
to discharge and since Colonial Pipeline already possess a spray irrigation permit,an NPDES permit would
not be issued. A copy of the EAA requirements is enclosed.
Based on the January 16, 1992 letter from Sylvia Lowrance(USEPA)to Thomas Cervino(Colonial Pipeline)
concerning the possible exemption of Colonial Pipeline to certain hazardous waste regulations, it is my
understanding that Colonial Pipeline may not need to actually hold a CWA permit,but simply be able to treat
the wastewater to the same permit limits that apply to an NPDES permit. If this is the case,the Division of
Water Quality NPDES Permitting Unit may be able to issue"special limits"to Colonial Pipeline so they could
treat the wastewater to the degree that would be required in an NPDES Permit without actually obtaining the
NPDES Permit. Colonial Pipeline would have to submit a request for"special limits"from:
NC DENR
DWQ/NPDES Permitting Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,NC 27699-1617
The Supervisor of the NPDES Permitting Unit is David Goodrich. He can be contacted at 919-733-5083 ext.
517.
If you have any questions or need more information,please contact Jenny Rankin at(336)771-4608 ext.268.
Sincerely,
einPfut
Jenny Rankin
Environmental Chemist
cc: - --Joe Parker,Division of Waste Management,-Ha7ardous_Waste_Section
- --

ReCENED
14.D.Dap,.v E,!
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY P136 1 2 902
GROUNDWATER SECTION Ninst0 "sa;e 5'
i ,�ra1 oitica
Fieg
August 8, 2002
MEMORANDUM
To: Kim Colson
:ough:
/
D ebra Watts
From: Brian Wootton
Subject: Modification to Comments made March 25, 2002
Colonial Pipeline Company •
Guilford County
WQ0006317 /GW02081
The Groundwater Section received a renewal permit application on January 15,2002 for the
continued application of 7140 GPD of treated wastewater onto a 5.6 acre spray irrigation area. The
Division originally permitted the facility on February 10, 1977. The wastewater consists of treated
tank drainage waters from leaded and unleaded gasoline storage tanks,and untreated drainage water
from oil and kerosene storage tanks. The treatment system consists of a holding tank, an oil/water
separator, an air-stripping unit, two clay-lined aerated lagoons (a 147,000 gallon capacity and a
257,000 gallon capacity), an 80 GPM pump station, and a 5.6 acre spray irrigation field.
Since the Groundwater Section made recommendations to Kim Colson(Water Quality)on
March 25,2002,the permittee submitted a slight modification (received by the Groundwater Section
on May 21, 2002) to the original renewal application to be included in the renewal of this permit.
The permittee requests to"remove"the 147,000 gallon storage lagoon and 1.91 spray acreage from
the permit(leaving 3.69 spray acreage),since neither the lagoon nor the 1.91 acres have been used in
years and there are no plans to reactivate either. Condition No. 5a below requests that the permittee
submit a plan to close out the lagoon and spray field within 60 days of permit issuance. The
Attachment to this memorandum, "Standard Procedure for the Closure of Sludge Lagoons" is a
guideline for the permittee to use.
Groundwater monitoring shall continue from the existing wells(condition no. 1 below)due
to occasional elevated concentrations and exceedances of 2L Groundwater Standards (e.g. TDS,
Benzene, etc.). Effluent monitoring of the same constituents as required for the monitor wells shall
GW02081.doc Page 1 of 4

continue(as mentioned in condition no. 1 below)to check the effectiveness of the treatment system,
since this area historically has been used for other waste disposal activities.All of the monitor wells
are located inside of the Review Boundary and if concentrations or exceedances of sampled
constituents worsen in the future,then additional monitor wells may be necessary at and beyond the
Review Boundary.
Previous permits at this facility did not require a vertical separation distance between the
applied wastewater and surficial groundwater. To better ensure protection of groundwater, we
recommend that no spray operations take place when the vertical distance between the wastewater
applied and the groundwater is less than three feet, as noted in condition no. 3 below.
These comments shall supercede the Groundwater Section's comments written March 24,
2002. The Groundwater Section recommends re-issuance of the permit with the following
conditions:
1. Sampling Criteria:
a. Monitor wells MW-1B, MW-2, MW-5A, MW-6, MW-7, and MW-8 and the final effluent
from the storage lagoon shall be sampled every March, July, and November for the
parameters listed below. Prior to sampling the parameters,the measurement of water levels
must be taken.The depth to water in each well shall be measured from the surveyed point on
the top of the casing. The measuring points(top of well casing)of all monitoring wells shall
be surveyed relative to a common datum.
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) Water Level
pH Nitrate(NO3-N)
Total Ammonia Nitrogen (NH3-N) Chloride
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)
b. For Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), use only one of the following methods:
1) Standard Method 6230D, Practical Quantitation Limit (PQL) at 0.5 ug/L or less
2) Standard Method 6210,PQL at 0.5 ug/L or less
3) EPA Method 8021, Low Concentration, PQL at 0.5 ug/L or less
4) EPA Method 8260, Low Concentration, PQL at 0.5 ug/L or less
5) Another method with prior approval by the Groundwater Section Chief
Any of the referenced methods used for VOCs must at a minimum, include all the
constituents listed in Table VIII of Standard Method 6230D.Any method used must provide
a PQL of 0.5 ug/L or less, which must be supported by laboratory proficiency studies as
required by the DWQ Laboratory Certification Unit. Any constituents detected above the
Method Detection Limit(MDL)but below the PQL of 0.5 ug/L must be qualified(estimated)
and reported.
GW02081.doc Page 2 of 4

c. Any laboratory selected to analyze parameters must be Division of Water Quality(DWQ)
certified for those parameters required.
2. Reporting /Documentation:
a. All reports and documentation (GW-59) shall be mailed to the following address:
Groundwater Section
Permits and Compliance Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Updated blank forms(GW-59)maybe downloaded from the Groundwater Section's website
at http://gw.ehnr.state.nc.us/or requested from the address mentioned above.
b. The results of the sampling and analysis must be received on Form GW-59 (Groundwater
Quality Monitoring: Compliance Report Form)by the Groundwater Section(address listed in
the"Reporting/Documentation"section of the Groundwater Requirements),on or before the
last working day of the month following the sampling month. The data of all groundwater
sampling analyses required by the permit conditions must be reported using the most recent
GW-59 form along with attached copies of the laboratory analyses.
3. Vertical Separation Requirements:
Waste application activities shall not occur when the vertical separation between depth of
application and the water table is at less than three (3) feet. Verification of the water table
elevation can be confirmed by water level readings obtained from the monitor well(s)near
the site or auger boring(s), which must be done within 24 hours, prior to application of
wastewater.Any open borings must be properly filled with native soil,prior to application to
decrease the chance of any waste contaminating the groundwater.
4. Applicable Boundaries:
a. The COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY for the disposal system is specified by regulations in 15A
NCAC 2L, Groundwater Classifications and Standards. The Compliance Boundary for the
disposal system individually permitted prior to December 31, 1983 is established at either
500 feet from the waste disposal area,or at the property boundary,whichever is closest to the
waste disposal area. An exceedance of Groundwater Quality Standards at or beyond the
Compliance Boundary is subject to immediate remediation action according to 15A NCAC
2L .0106(d)(2).
GW02081.doc Page 3 of 4

b. The REVIEW BOUNDARY is established around the disposal systems midway between the
Compliance Boundary and the perimeter of the waste disposal area. Any exceedance of
standards at the Review Boundary shall require action in accordance with 15A NCAC 2L
.0106(d)(1).
5. Additional Requirements:
*a. Within sixty (60) days of permit issuance, a Lagoon/Spray field Closure Plan shall be
submitted by the applicant to the Division of Water Quality detailing the manner in which the
abandoned lagoon and spray fields(see Figure 2)shall be properly closed. See the"Standard
Procedure for the Closure of Sludge Lagoon" document (attached).
b. Any additional groundwater quality monitoring,as deemed necessary by the Division,shall
be provided.
If there are any questions, please call Brian Wootton at(919) 715-6164.
*Denotes different language than the shell document.
Attachments: FIGIURE 1
"Standard Procedure for the Closure of Sludge Lagoons"
GW02081.doc Page 4 of 4

_ .=-- .-;-:.:f,t :,: Colonial Pipeline Company
_•- -T . _ _.: ., :_i ::r•,:,__ Guilford County
—
_�il (^t («., u. WQ0006317
� .. _:'Ill �_.1 :ct 'i
^� • • :,IProperii I;: ;. �' .. < �DONED F:a "rs.n. - -_ -_ :`liz5 '„:t:aSa: i. � __ �:,n. / 4c.::c � '� I«:) •• • I. F'\
SPRAY FIELDS - _ .. '%. �._•I,..,*.-q
`..t�r, . 71 , . ' 1 •
iI •,••• • • uq` • I•' 1j\ ,•- :1. • •• `> �1 - ` ' w.,• M1•t N,•.
:. ra.ai.
ABANDONED ',I r .. +•r _ �• j F. l. •
/.'- ` +'�. `, `•4.
LAGOON II .�;_ _ ,- • •d7r:_,:..'' -_ J/. i ` x; ,i;:n • �.
" . ril )--.-,:••• ••,.. / • .;-,..i.% •‘• \ ...'.., e, ,.(-- %. .:::, -:: .. ,.. ... k,
ACTIVE II i 1 :If w`.. \- l`• ;i, 4;1 II��� 1 :/•?i' i.c •.q\.y „t _� �•-• )• Lo
LAGOON1:: -r- _: _Ja .. 1••'3 i; ;t:..7 , _.� ( • 1i _ %. •\ .1\
I I (c l :) - till: p i I r' .. ,'._. :- I// �- ', ,? =
i II I� •• ( Y 4-' 1 .p'::y:r 11 .:L%"�: : 1: .. ,�, =1..„.-.. .n F_i' t • �:� `..�• �. ) ` r• ,..
...D .(.1)r(.....)
li• q till (.:) II ... / .. I u ; 4,4. �. Q / •.:::. 1 a l. 1• � ^.
• r 1. — .
-• • \," ' ‘ ,_,...._.4. [ 1•:, . ,ii,.„:...:.,:....1 ....•
•P f 1 1 / rl J: I �a:Z '11 y•......:.. L�s i • .••\�> . i
•
i ,.....,•, ..
, •:, . C•n :I\
t. y`;!.:?1,%1Pi.1,-.--;.."-...5-` t.t,•••• '::••• •ifr. ; •' -•C ' ••=•''':-...• •'•' •c••:=• •'•i . .•S . 4. • . L.,)j•,,k ...••••••••1•-•-•---•-
i\ P7
1 y t
•• 1- I ., \ /11w-AY • ii;/'. ..,:ty,-i. ..)til. i , i♦ • / , -r'.v.._;,..- a
_• \`• -
(W7] • . .. •,• it.% \r„1 si"-• /�' • //• rnarlir• .
�_ ,! . \';'•. : .
•
: %1/l.. r•.•'�. 11pYllfot1l11,'i.Elt:- \
�. .. ur.,r.•t+•,ti��• :_/'• �. Jr I 'r� M1,I • e.•tv�__--- n--Ir•�1�':
d � `l ..
• t1• • •••.• ! •') I ]O. :I,• MIu.DM;h LICIf n.15.....-n.-- ... — .
.- •
•
- or.►•nr.
Rtvi-e✓ L.I L7 ' [' '••- — _, AlI r••an•.. -. ru• '.-_.. L_.Irc.•I'r1.1�I/ Cot.oul•s� rlr[llra[ C ,,
/,� •
-.•-n �..r. 1,.I. n. ru T
p n 1 J
144vy —_ Co„nianGt Do�cnaar�
i
CeoPf:anLc Rtvit•�. BauncQa..y
Q .L r
Props Lj,,e �mn.Par�. — profcr l y .411 e.
1 / O i •

Standard Procedure for the Closure of Slud a La oons
• 1 . Sample the sludge in each lagoon in three locations (3 sludge
samples per lagoon)
2 . The following analytical procedures should be run on the
sludge samples :
(a) Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) SW-846
EPA Method 1211 for volatiles, semi-volatiles, and
metals ,
• (b) Ignitability SW-846 EPA Method 1010/1020 ,
(c) Reactivity EPA OSW,
•
(d) Corrosivity EPA Method 9045
3 . If the lagoon does not have a liner,
then the underlying soil
and
material should bemP�o procedin uee res (2) (a) �nIfathe lagoon has
analyzed for the TCLP P
a natural compacted clay
liner,
analyzed the
forathe1TCLPshould be
sampled in three locations
procedures in (2) (a) . If the lagoon has a synthetic liner,
then the soil material under the synthetic liner should be
sampled in three locations and analyzed for the
nTCLPt of view, the
procedures in (2) (a) . From a field sampling p
sludge and underlying clay or underlying soil material can be
collected using a core barrel sampler for shallow soils , where
the core barrel is driven into the sludge/clay/soil matrix and
later extracted.
4 . If the sludge/clay liner underlying soil material has TCLP
then
concentrations that are above the hazardousLP andetheaDivisiontory 1of, plaste
the material is considered
Management/Hazardous Waste
texSection should be contacted, and
the material needs to
be 5 . If the sludge/clay liner/ underlying soil material
l has
tTCLLP
concentrations that are below the TCLP regulatory eft in
below Groundwater 2L Standards, then the sludge
tmay
s me s le
place and the lagoon closed without excavating
6 . If the sludge/clay
liner/underlying soil material has TCLP
concentrations that are below the
h TCLP
n regulatory
olimits
above Groundwater 2L Standards ,

(a) Excavate the material that is above Groundwater 2L
Standards, then proceed with lagoon closure .
(b) Perform predictive calculations that demonstrate that the
vertical leaching of the contaminant in question in the
material will not cause an exceedance of Groundwater 2L
Standards in the underlying surficial groundwater
saturated zone . This calculation would probably require
the need of site characterization of the subsurface
hydrogeologic parameters of concern. The predictive
calculation would need to consider vertical leaching and
subsequent mixing in the groundwater saturated zone .
7 . Once it is decided whether the sludge/underlying soil material
can remain in place or needs to be excavated, the following
steps should be followed:
8 . Remove all water from lagoons .
9 . Remove all inflow piping'; etc . to the lagoons .
10 . If the liner (clay or synthetic) is being left in place, it
must be breached cr ripped up to allow water to infiltrate
past the liner.
11 . Remove the earthen berms and grade the area to match the
surrounding topography, in order to prevent water from
accumulating and ponding .
12 . Add a vegetative cover to prevent soil erosion.
13 . The final approval of the above procedure and analyses is
granted by the Regional Office Groundwater Supervisor.
If any land-disturbing activity associated with the above
procedures will affect more than one (1) acre of land, any the
erosion and sedimentation control plan must be approved
Land Quality Section of the Division of Land Resources . North
Carolina General Statute 113A-57 (4) requires that this plan be
submitted at least 30 days prior to beginning the land-
disturbing activity. Additional information is available by
contacting Mr. John Holley at [phone] .

Re:[Fwd:WQ0006317]
Subject: Re: [Fwd: WQ0006317]
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 13:44:59 -0400
From: Kristin Miguez<[e-mail]>
Organization: NCDENR Divison of Water Quality
To: Jenny Rankin <[e-mail]>
Hey Jenny,
I was trying to find out to whom the review had been assigned because I received a
call from the Hazardous Waste Section about the project. Joe Parker (919
303-8955) called inquiring as to whether a series of holding tanks was included in
our permit. There are apparently 12 tanks (a series of 11 that go to 1) that may
be subject to a permit from hazardous waste (related to benzene contaminated
water) IF the tanks are NOT included in our permit. The permit currently
references "a holding tank, " but we're not sure if all twelve together could be
considered one, or if they ones in question are actually not part of the permit.
I was hoping you would be able to provide some info to Joe as a result of any
visits you have made to the facility. He would like any information he can get
before they contact Colonial regarding the possible need for a permit.
A formal staff report is not necessary if this investigation does not generate any
additional comments, but I would appreciate a sign-off from Steve.
Thanks for your help!
Kristin
Jenny Rankin wrote:
> Kristin,
> My apologies, this project was filed away before I commented on it. I'm very
> sorry for the long delay! My comments on the project would be to reissue the
> permit with the modifications that Colonial Pipeline requested (the requested
> change in the language of the description of the treatment and disposal
> facility: two x 10 hp unit instead of six x 3-5 hp and the change in the size
> of the spray field and number of spray heads (as long as the smaller acreage
> meets the disposal needs and allows disposal at agronomic rates) . There have
> not been any complaints or water quality related problems in regards to this
> permit. Will this suffice or would you like a hard copy of a staff report?
> Again, I apologize for the long delay in commenting.
> Thanks,
> Jenny Rankin
> Steve Mauney wrote:
> > JENNY- Has this come in? In either event, let Kristin know. -Thanks
> >
> >
> >
> > Subject: WQ0006317
> > Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2002 15:07:23 -0400
> > From: Kristin Miguez <[e-mail]>
> > Organization: NCDENR Divison of Water Quality
> > To: Steve Mauney <[e-mail]>
> >
> > Steve,
> >
> > Can you tell me who is reviewing the Colonial Pipeline spray renewal?
> >
> > thanks,
> > Kristin
I of 3 7/29/2002 2:14 PM

Re:[Fwd:WQ0006317]
> >
> >
> >
> > Kristin E. Miguez <[e-mail]>
> > Environmental Technician V
> > Non-Discharge Permitting Unit
> > NC DENR-Division of Water Quality
> >
> > Kristin E. Miguez
> > Environmental Technician V <[e-mail]>
> > Non-Discharge Permitting Unit
> > NC DENR-Division of Water Quality
> > 1617 Mail Service Center Fax: (919) 715-6048
> > Raleigh Work: (919) 733-5083 ext. 524
> > NC
> > 27699-1617
> > Additional Information:
> > Last Name Miguez
> > First Name Kristin
> > Version 2.1
> >
> >
> >
> > STEVE MAUNEY <[e-mail]>
> > ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER
> > DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
> > ENVIRONMENT& NATURAL RESOURCES
> >
> > STEVE MAUNEY
> > ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER <[e-mail]>
> > DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
> > ENVIRONMENT& NATURAL RESOURCES
> > 585 WAUGHTOWN ST.
> > WINSTON-SALEM
> > N.C.
> > 27107
> > USA
> > Additional Information:
> > Last Name MAUNEY
> > First Name STEVE
> > Version 2.1
> --
> Jenny Rankin
> Division of Water Quality
> Winston-Salem Regional Office
> 585 Waughtown Street
> Winston-Salem, NC 27107
> (336) 771-4608 ext. 268
> fax: [phone]
Kristin E. Miguez <[e-mail]>
Environmental Technician V
Non-Discharge Permitting Unit
NC DENR-Division of Water Quality
2 of 3 7/29/2002 2:14 PM

Memorandum
June 3, 2002
To: Brian Wootton, Permits and Compliance Unit, Groundwater Section, Central
Office, Raleigh
Through: Sherri Knight, Supervisor, Groundwater Section, Winston Salem Regional Office
From: LP
Christopher reene, L.S.S., Hydrogeological Technician, GW Section, WSRO
Subject: Colonial Pipeline—Greensboro Terminal, Spray irrigation, addendum to permit
renewal #GW 02009/WQ 0006317
On May 23, 2002, WSRO received a request to modify the subject permit amendment
that was recently reviewed and commented (see attachment).
As indicated in the 3/19/02 memorandum, WSRO's 3/15/02 site investigation cited
overall good condition of the affected spray area.
Details are sparse in the submitted information relating to how the 147,000 gallon lagoon
will be "removed". The 3/3/02 correspondence from Colonial Pipeline, Inc. indicates "the
smaller lagoon and additional spray heads have not been in service for several years and there are
no plans to reactivate either of them. We request that they be removed from our permit."A
question WSRO has is what will be the disposition of the lagoon once it is "removed" from the
permit?
WSRO voices no opposition or concern for replacing the distribution(spray) technology
with more efficient equipment, nor with reduction of the spray area(3.69 acres).
It is advised that Colonial Pipeline, Inc. be more specific about details of the disposition
of the "removed" lagoon before this addendum is approved.

' DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GROUNDWATER SECTION
•
/ffy ...2
/ N.C. Dept. of ENR
MEMORANDUM
TO: >l eri-i` [cvr,�ft "
4%- Sf 5c few— Regional Office Oegio :al Ofi(ce
FROM:,..5^, ./ 4j0C+7/(r3,—) .
SUBJECT: Application for Permit Renewal, Permit Amendment
New
/Permit Repair/Alteration/ of Exist. Disposal System(DEHJ
COMMENTS: �c cC--f�;C2//r To rer"�# r �t��/C2/ /C*�•J /4 ,4ci€f 2
/A. „A fir"
Facility Name: (.D/C1/wet /.) e 6. " 6reersi r. " e``/�/
'fi!/
County: Ge.-4rfC dr-cia
Type of Project: J pa Rs h74G- ,
/0/-61/i drr/S �L
APPLICABLE PERMIT NO.s: WQ o�6.W/7 GW 020 / C 6110-a-cot
DEH ANIMAL WASTE(DWQ)
EPA(CONST. GRANTS) A to C
The Groundwater Section has received ONLY ONE (1)copy of the referenced permit application.A copy of the
application should have been sent to your Regional Water Quality Supervisor,so please use that copy for
your review - IF A COPY HAS NOT BEEN RECEIVED IN THE REGIONAL OFFICE,PLEASE LET ME
A) KNOW.
The Groundwater Section has received ONLY ONE (11 copy of the referenced permit application.A copy of the
application should have been sent to _,DEH's Regional Soil Specialist,so please use
that copy for your review IF A COPY HAS NOT BEEN RECEIVED IN THE REGIONAL OFFICE,PLEASE
T ME KNOW.
The Groundwater Section received two(2)copies of the referenced permit application. One copy of the
application documents we received is attached.
Please review the application aerials for completeness. If you feel additional information is necessary,please
let me know no later than K'l e If/ 2_•2c' . A copy of any formal request for additional information
will be forwarded to you.
If you d,,.,¢.not /,need any additional information to complete your review,please provide your final comments
by Vit-`5p //, coca, . If you request and/or receive additional information,your final comments
,ire due no later than 14 days after you receive the additional information
\9-98TRAN.SHL(rev. 9/29/98)

Qr i a,tri I(Vbo I I or) - CD-w 51151 Da--
Division
Alidd {Ynterof Qttnlit}
lk
eN"iCu'l
Aliacke d is cA r✓uc Li h ccif.cvi rr(v, sf
tkcif \Ar(;s reciA v'e.d for c) jer��`e,f-
-i-1ii1 15 Curs e,' furu►'i—housC r
elu,vv c"t k . Cl oe ll'j t-t ((Lc 1,6Y4(1,t ft. .
I VV at)(1,1 {1 CCi cY1 ('e cr,ls, b7^ I GL S(.t(sCe
v,31 '),IV, 14-4 1(-1 1,\10-S -1 V i IN (t.cm,. k,
v-e.r(oc(i/VV.vvh: CIA
. .. 1 k 1-eft-t tr2,c 1 -k,
k(tt1 Ct -1 4s ; J(I , ec,,,,,,tit,,,-,k_
w .ec l ootl l $' r t u a c( Cat( ►c
`,1 ca t (6.-e ( t'istir1'I s.-. ( ,k.
512 N.Salisbury St. Raleigh NC 27604 Phone(919)

Colonial Pipeline Company
Creating Excellence in Transportation Se-'jcesi'EC i=I`E.D/U=rl,q
fi'`i'Q GROUNDWATErR SECTION
FARON D. LEIGH 02 MAY 2 I AM ,In„:1 hone: 336-294-9737
Mid-Atlantic District Environmental Technician smile: 331i 292 6462
Friday,May 03,2002
NCDENR-Division of Water Quality
Non-Discharge Permitting Unit
Attn: Kristen Miquez
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh,NC 27699-1617
SUBJECT: Spray Irrigation Permit Renewal Modification
Colonial Pipeline Company—Greensboro Facility
Guilford County,North Carolina
Permit No.WQ0006317
Dear Ms.Miquez,
As a follow-up to our recent telephone conversation,Colonial Pipeline Company respectfully requests a minor modification to the
subject non-di charge permit. In an effort to enhance our treatment efficiency,we would like to modify our lagoon operation as
follows:
• Replace our current(6)six—3 to 5 horsepower units with(2)two — 10 horsepower units. Our consultant,Richard Siebert with
Aqua Tech in Richmond,Virginia advised that this would provide better mixing and increased oxygen supply. A copy of our
proposed configuration showing zones of influence is attached.
Also,our current permit identifies a 147,000-gallon lagoon that is no longer in operation and it states that we have 5.6 acres of spray
area with(24)twenty-four spray heads. In reality,we are using only 3.69 acres of spray area with(17)seventeen spray heads. The
smaller lagoon and the additional spray heads have not been in service for several years and there are no plans to reactivate either of
them. We request that they be removed from our new permit.
Colonial very much appreciates your assistance with this permit renewal and proposed modifications. If you have questions or require
additional information,please contact me at 336-294-9737 or at the letterhead address.
Sincerely, -
Faron D. Leigh
MAY 1 3 2002
attachments "ON-DISCHARGE PERMITTiNG
cc: Cedric L.Kline,Colonial Pipeline Company,Greensboro Operations Manager w/attachments
Jeff D.Titus,Colonial Pipeline Company,Mid-Atlantic District Environmental Project Manager w/attachments
411 Gallimore Dairy Road Greensboro,North Carolina 27409

i , 1 I- I .i I I , 1 1 • I • I I , 1 `I1 I l ' • 1 1 i 1 ,
. . 1 - •• . I • ! ! , 1 I I I . 1 ! I . ! •: : I I . 1 1 I I I . • •• ' , ' •• . , • I
I • i '.! ! I . ? , . / ' I
•
, i I iil t/ I ' ll ly� iil I iI i ' ii / ;� ;�1 ' ~:•�! i I
, I - o,,.,er.10 i1•N1=1.v•e,Ji , .• I • i ',. 'i, . I ; 'e�' .o►.�e: O r INit.ue►�Ut..
. • I I/. I . I IF-o►z, Iptctuft! Mo.D71_ )•r: • :�' I : , . \: \ 1rbR 1-lo on. Mo p_ )S114'16
• • : I . ' : : , I �) ( .` '.bT• cYlij , ; I ! i iI :• I • . I : �` '. . • ' \, :I Frei ,1 SY6?EMI . .
I1 aN R AP�� S
! ; • 1 1 1 I) I i (AP•411!..titiosT)Ot:PI, PPL:►b • 1.7 7 -i : 1 '. ! I \I \ , I` I • (A�'Pt.- �•P+T) .
I , 1 1 . ' i I a i � "i _L'1:>v:.;i oN I �_e r-i -RC S I\k''J ` : t • 1[,i1tP' P 'M 11 L 1°k3 • ,9
' G-isu-ot..-4--; V.01:1 : , ,) • `!!.9
1 11 1i . 111 . , ! 11 I . : 11 1 . 1 I R6c-+tsrVr�.
. • , ' I i .I: I � 1 . I 1 i l : i ! I I � i I I i 1 ; 1 ' ! I. ' I �
I. ! I ! , r . i . ! : ! ii ij 00
• I, i l i : ! ' I • I I I i l i i, I:
i j i I I i ! ! . ' ij I
1 , • . MIOORi1J(1-.• I : i I • : ; I � 1 I
1 I 1 , ; • • 1 • 1 • I . 1
i C II I ' ' II : I ; ' I : • i Si ; I . • ! . . I ! I • I I . ,
• { i I ! ! 1 . 1— ` 1
• .1' I ! I ' I1 . 1 ! II . 1 ' ! I : •
! : ! • !i . / • • I t
1 . ! . ; i . l li I I ! 1 : . 1 I 1 •
�; i i I - i .I i 1 i . I : 1 i i : i 1. . 1 .• •
•1 _ `
• \: . I . ! ! ! I I ! , , . I , 1 ; ' , .CR73trs . . •
' I ! ! : I 1 i ' 11I1 , ; . i I , , I ti • i 1 t �' . j 1
1 • I i I \i ! ; i \: I I I . I • i I . I 1 , I 1 i I I , I ; I - j .
! \ 1 , ! 1 i i 1 I : , I 1 i ! / I /;/1 • - . I. I J 1
I I i ! I ` ' t 1 1 iLL
I I I I ' j -T I _I I ; ; i It r�'� -• �r — J
• . , ,\!.— ' I �' . I I I I I iI I ; i ;/ 1 1ri: ' •
'< �I:I-♦_..f. _I-a..r 1-, - ' '�-•'1� -I' '-�-! -i _-J+I I --- .
1 1 i ! i I I .� I i 7 1 21 , I It : ; , i • I • 1 1
' _ ! 1 -, -�...I- I I ' 1_.: I ... 1 - --j ,?Y1oD,ti1 PPS.'C"'� ,
I ' ; I 1i � ' Ilii :'I1 , Ir, 1 I `1 ' III 1111i1Wl � �! 13'�Ni_...no �. l3n,c• l ; l ,
I i i , , , , 1 I t 1 ' 1 I I ,
p�.3T7aD._. I • ; i b�at v, ,W,a,rlcr; F 9MI Ir �!iII1 ! , ; : . . I 1 ,! III ' il 1 I I , I '.� 1 Ic :
•
i •iI . ; ! . pq,NTRdil ThTiii
o 0oupcII ; ; ; 1 ; . I iI 1 , • • ; . . . , !I111 I I . , . , I . I ' ` ; , . , . . . I
1 ; ; ; , . . I ; „ 1 . 1 ; . : ; .'. , 1 . 1 . I . i . I ' ! I ;. 1 • i . • .
r II ! t11111 11 , I it I • 1 I ' . • I I ,
' . . 1 ! ' i • tI • , 1 . ' I . . j I II ill ; I , ' , t I '
`, ; : ' 1 ; I I II ; . I • • i , i • : . I . ; : :: , , •
I • • i • 11 : 1 III '
I , . 1 . I , I
M I )1 I I I I I I ' I I i'I•I I I ' 1- — ri' i' I i i I ' I 1 •
I WWI ! ,I ! 1 1 ! t l ! ' `
j 1 I I i i j 1 I ' I ! 1 I .. .' ‘4.4 ;41. g'. ..1.' ----. r:
ITI
l...L- V �� Q. i i 1 `
z I 1 HI ! ! • I : I ' I 11 i ' � � I I II III I1I O
�I 1 I � : 1 I i 1 i I • I I I . I I s -;z,,! 01 92.'
I _ 1 ! i it Ii1 I II , I I I ! I11 , I I I
I I ; , I I i 1 O Oca,O Gra��..N L3r�SI...�• , ,W_ �rN I i3 n /Nc.
I.
. ' I I 1 . ' I 1 1 I . . • • I i . 1 ; I i i �'i� ' I . v I I . I I - '.I I •w; 11 • Ir .— -...i 1 I , • 1 . . ' , I .r I

MixAer
• SPECIFICATION SHEET
' ' SYSTEM FOR
• •
[AQUA
•
• AQUA MODEL 1 OTMB MixAer SYSTEM
-MORE THAN JUST AN AERATOR'
PERFORMANCE DATA
A) Horsepower Rating 10 HP @ 880 RPM
B) Flow Rate Through Device 7,476 GPM
C) Discharge Velocity of Issue 16.5 FPS
D) Zones of Influence for Basins with 10' Liquid Depth:
LIQUID SOLIDS COMPLETE MIX UNIFORM OXYGEN
CONCENTRATION DIAMETER DISPERSION
ma/1 MLSS FEET DIAMETER- FEET
Clean Water Not Applicable 188
Up to 500 107 • 181
Up to 1,000 75 175
Up to 3,000 62 143
Up to 6,000 53 124
Up to 10,000 48 1 1 1
E) Oxygen Transfer Capability:
1) The oxygen transfer rate for the Aqua MixAer System increases as the amount of surface area
available in the basin increases. See the Oxygen Transfer Graph for the actual transfer rate at
standard conditions for your application.
2) Industry standard oxygen transfer rate using the unsteady state test method in a test tank with
excessive cobalt ion concentrations will produce a standard oxygen transfer rate of 4.0 pounds of
oxygen per horsepower hour with this model.
UNIT WEIGHTS AND DIMENSIONS
r LEGEND DESCRIPTION pIMENSIONS
'I. D--
• M• MST Minimum Skin Thickness Acceptable 1/4'
I; on Structure of Device
• F Float Diameter Supporting Unit B4"
H Height of Complete Assembled Aqua 80"
MixAer System
*ICI.
_ __ _ S Submergence Depth of Floating Aqua 41'
k--- - >\%1 —i MixAer System g
►� E Elevation of Discharge Deflector Above 10"
/ 1%
T ----Tie
Basin Surface
N j 1;
--MTD Diameter of Discharge Deflector 51'
Rr i :: R Radius of Turn on Discharge Deflector 20'
P
%: T Throat Diameter of Device at.Propeller 15-3/4"'
--.�� 7 S Location
•P Propeller Drive Shaft Diameter 2-3/6'
RFC Reserve Flotation Capacity of Aqua 651 Ibs.
-.)
MixAer System
(-- AIJW Assembled Unit Weight of Device 8BO IDS.
_� , GSW Gross Shipping Weight of Unit ,1,150 lbs. -
(November. 1990)
MAY 1 3 2002
l____-
r.+.i :SCHARGE PERMITTING

Michael F.Easley
Governor
r William G.Ross Jr.,Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
0 -c Gregory J.Thorpe,Ph.D.,Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
April 30, 2002 F'. n. l i
Faron D. Leigh
Colonial Pipeline Co-Greensbo h4 `� C;
411 Gallimore Road MAY 0 8 2002
Greensboro,NC 27419
VV n.:t -SaiOln;
Subject: Delegation of Enfo> y0A> thiaisC�'
For NDMR Monitoring and Reporting Violations
Dear Faron D. Leigh: • '/Q 2L t 6?l 7
On November 5, 2001 the Director of the Division of Water Quality delegated enforcement authority for
Non-Discharge Monitoring Report (NDMR) monitoring and reporting violations to the Regional Water Quality
Supervisors. Beginning with the NDMR for May 2002, the Supervisors will assess civil penalties for violations
of monitoring frequencies and monitoring parameter permit limits. All monitoring frequency violations will be
issued a Notice of Violation (NOV) and assessed a civil penalty. All parameter permit limit violations will
result in a NOV. For the first six months of the delegation, any violation of a parameter permit limit of 40% or
greater will also result in the assessment of a civil penalty except for flow violations. Flow violations of 10% or
greater will be assessed a civil penalty. After the first six months of delegation, any violation of a parameter
permit limit of 20% or greater will result in the assessment of a civil penalty except for flow violations. Flow
violations of 10% or greater will be assessed a civil penalty. The civil penalty amounts for these violations are
as follows:
Violations of Effluent Limits* Reporting Violations*
• Exceed Influent/Effluent Limits • Missing Data/per Data Point
1. Weekly Avg./Daily Max. $250 1. Permit Limit $50
2. Monthly/Quarterly Avg. $1,000 2. No Permit Limit $25
Violations for failure to submit a NDMR, as required by your permit, will be issued a NOV and assessed a civil
penalty by the Non-Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit in the Raleigh Central Office. Failure to
submit a NDMR will carry a civil penalty assessment of$1,000*.
* For Permittees with NDMR violations in four or more months of the previous six months, a multiplier will be
applied to the civil penalty assessment(4 of 6 months— 1.25, 5 of 6 months— 1.35, 6 of 6 months— 1.45)
The process for identifying violations is as follows:
1. All monitoring results from the submitted NDMR are entered into the Non-Discharge Compliance and
Enforcement database.
2. A list is generated detailing the Permittees who are required to submit an NDMR within 30 days following
that particular month and did not.
3. A second list is generated detailing the Permittees whose NDMR's contained violations for monitoring
frequency, missing data, parameter permit limits,etc.
nntrid
Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh,NC 27699-1617 [phone]

_6ation of Enforcement Authority Page 2
1. The two lists are sent to the appropriate Regional DWQ Office for verification. At this time, the regional
staff will conduct a review of the NDMR and identify any other reporting violations.
2. Based on the review, all Permittees who did not submit NDMR and were required to, will be issued a NOV
and will be assessed a civil penalty by the Non-Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit in the Raleigh
Central Office. All Permittees who violated their monitoring permit limits or did not adequately conduct the
monitoring in accordance with the permit will be issued a compliance and/or enforcement action (NOV,
assessment of civil penalty, etc.)by the designated Regional Supervisor.
3. If a civil penalty assessment is deemed necessary, the Supervisors will assess the appropriate civil penalty
for the violations taking into consideration the assessment factors established in N.C.G.S. 143-292.1(b). If
the Permittee has had violations in four or more of the last six months, a multiplier will be applied to the
civil penalty assessment.
4. The Permittees in violation will be issued a letter informing them of the compliance and/or enforcement
action and the options available to them for response.
If there is no wastewater flow through the treatment system for the month, please indicate in the Comments
section why and when the flow and wastewater monitoring will resume.
For combination discharge/non-discharge facilities, where the treatment plant has a permitted discharge as well
as a spray irrigation system or other Non-Discharge treatment and disposal system, please indicate the volume
routed to the system when reporting flow measurements.
For any instances of non-compliance, the appropriate non-compliant box must be marked on the back of the
NDMR and a description of the non-compliance must be included in the comments section.
Please be advised that nothing in this letter precludes the Division from assessing civil penalties of up to
$25,000 per day per violation or from taking additional enforcement actions when appropriate. If you have any
questions concerning this letter, please contact Daryl Merritt or our Central Water Quality staff or your
Regional Water Quality staff as listed below:
1. Asheville Regional Office: Kevin Barnett, [phone],Ext. 205, [e-mail]
2. Central Office: Daryl Merritt, [phone], Ext. 581, [e-mail]
3. Fayetteville Regional Office: Belinda Henson, [phone],Ext. 727, [e-mail]
Grady Dobson, [phone], Ext. 329, [e-mail]
4. Mooresville Regional Office: Ellen Huffman, [phone],Ext. 233, [e-mail]
5. Raleigh Regional Office: Charles Brown, [phone], Ext 237, [e-mail]
6. Washington Regional Office: Kim Cole, [phone],Ext. 317, [e-mail]
7. Wilmington Regional Office: Dean Hunkele, [phone], Ext. 219, [e-mail]
8. Winston-Salem Regional Office: Abner Braddy, [phone], Ext. 276, [e-mail]
Corey Basinger, [phone],Ext. 277, [e-mail]
Si ely,
Signed for Dennis Ramsey by Daryl Merritt:
ifirklif
Dennis Ramsey, Assistant Chief
Non-Discharge Branch
Cc: Non-Discharge Compliance and Enforcement Unit
Winston-Salem Regional Office
Central Files

DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GROUNDWATER SECTION RECEIVED
March 25, 2002 N.C. Dept of EHNR
APR 0 3 2002
MEMORANDUM Winston-Salemi
Regional Ofi
To: Kim Colson
Through: Debra Watts P, ©•
From: Brian Wootton2571/
Subject: Colonial Pipeline Company
Guilford County
WQ0006317/GW02009
The Groundwater Section has reviewed the subject renewal permit application for the continued
application of 7140 GPD of treated wastewater onto a 5.6 acre spray irrigation area. The Division
originally permitted the facility on February 10, 1977.The wastewater consists of treated tank drainage
waters from leaded and unleaded gasoline storage tanks, and untreated drainage water from oil and
kerosene storage tanks. The treatment system consists of a holding tank, an oil/water separator,an air-
stripping unit,two clay-lined aerated lagoons(a 147,000 gallon capacity and a 257,000 gallon capacity),
an 80 GPM pump station, and a 5.6 acre spray irrigation field.
Groundwater monitoring shall continue from the existing wells (condition no. 1 below) due to
occasional elevated concentrations and exceedances of 2L Groundwater Standards(e.g.TDS,Benzene,
etc.*Effluent monitoring of the same constituents as required for the monitor wells shall continue (as
mentioned in condition no. 1 below)to check the effectiveness of the treatment system, since this area
historically has been used for other waste disposal activities.All of the monitor wells are located inside
of the Review Boundary and if concentrations or exceedances of sampled constituents worsen in the
future, then additional monitor wells may be necessary at and beyond the Review Boundary.
Previous permits at this facility did not require a vertical separation distance between the applied
wastewater and surficial groundwater.To better ensure protection of groundwater,we recommend that
no spray operations take place when the vertical distance between the wastewater applied and the
groundwater is less than three feet, as noted in condition no. 3 below.
The Groundwater Section recommends re-issuance of the permit with the following conditions:
GW02009.doc Page 1 of 3

1. Sampling Criteria:
a. Monitor wells MW-1B,MW-2,MW-5A,MW-6,MW-7,and MW-8 and the final effluent from
the storage lagoon shall be sampled every March,July,and November for the parameters listed
below. Prior to sampling the parameters, the measurement of water levels must be taken. The
depth to water in each well shall be measured from the surveyed point on the top of the casing.
The measuring points(top of well casing)of all monitoring wells shall be surveyed relative to a
common datum.
Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) Water Level
pH Nitrate (NO3-N)
Total Ammonia Nitrogen (NH3-N) Chloride
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)
b. For Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), use only one of the following methods:
1) Standard Method 6230D, Practical Quantitation Limit (PQL) at 0.5 ug/L or less
2) Standard Method 6210, PQL at 0.5 ug/L or less
3) EPA Method 8021, Low Concentration,PQL at 0.5 ug/L or less
4) EPA Method 8260, Low Concentration, PQL at 0.5 ug/L or less
5) Another method with prior approval by the Groundwater Section Chief.
Any of the referenced methods used for VOCs must at a minimum, include all the constituents
listed in Table VIII of Standard Method 6230D. Any method used must provide a PQL of 0.5
ug/L or less,which must be supported by laboratory proficiency studies as required by the DWQ
Laboratory Certification Unit. Any constituents detected above the Method Detection Limit
(MDL)but below the PQL of 0.5 ug/L must be qualified (estimated) and reported.
c. Any laboratory selected to analyze parameters must be Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
certified for those parameters required.
2. Reporting /Documentation:
a. All reports and documentation(GW-59) shall be mailed to the following address:
Groundwater Section
Permits and Compliance Unit
1636 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1636
Updated blank forms(GW-59)may be downloaded from the Groundwater Section's website at
http://gw.ehnr.state.nc.us/or requested from the address mentioned above.
b. The results of the sampling and analysis must be received on Form GW-59 (Groundwater
Quality Monitoring: Compliance Report Form)by the Groundwater Section(address listed in the
"Reporting/Documentation" section of the Groundwater Requirements), on or before the last
working day of the month following the sampling month.The data of all groundwater sampling
analyses required by the permit conditions must be reported using the most recent GW-59 form
GW02009.doc Page 2 of 3

along with attached copies of the laboratory analyses.
3. Vertical Separation Requirements:
Waste application activities shall not occur when the vertical separation between depth of
application and the water table is at less than three (3) feet. Verification of the water table
elevation can be confirmed by water level readings obtained from the monitor well(s) near the
site or auger boring(s),which must be done within 24 hours,prior to application of wastewater.
Any open borings must be properly filled with native soil, prior to application to decrease the
chance of any waste contaminating the groundwater.
4. Applicable Boundaries:
a. The COMPLIANCE BOUNDARY for the disposal system is specified by regulations in 15A
NCAC 2L, Groundwater Classifications and Standards. The Compliance Boundary for the
disposal system individually permitted prior to December 31, 1983 is established at either 500
feet from the waste disposal area,or at the property boundary,whichever is closest to the waste
disposal area. An exceedance of Groundwater Quality Standards at or beyond the Compliance
Boundary is subject to immediate remediation action according to 15A NCAC 2L.0106(d)(2).
b. The REVIEW BOUNDARY is established around the disposal systems midway between the
Compliance Boundary and the perimeter of the waste disposal area.Any exceedance of standards
at the Review Boundary shall require action in accordance with 15A NCAC 2L .0106(d)(1).
5. Additional Requirements:
Any additional groundwater quality monitoring, as deemed necessary by the Division, shall
be provided.
If there are any questions please call Brian Wootton at [phone].
3
GW02009.doc Page 3 of 3

:'i
p
•a yJ� ej,raad0
r d —
ktr.,ag (� a11i7 4.4d0.14
•��pp /jy�ppu»oa Ave!A'ad �7Y1Di�Jwl'
rovyt as
-ANYdRO�-3N113.I.d'11'1NO101 V�I 1{I-sill - .nY r.s •t u
_ . .�,1 Irk 1pI -
-_. .. I. ......�..r.'...\ •.r.. JD l r0 3.,'iW l 'L 71 7i a I ' �F.°�. : l
53.1M't 131'1 JN1yMINOy n
' '1 /. 1• firs- 1/00.i , •c ' )
I, /' \ tiliiow'AI )��InuwnKW `, �G/ =, �. ° . . - I.
q ,
fill, +t •' a.4t'•
\
�� `1(`� „, r•. .\ "S. 1 �' , n-, �. E \\ 'l I. •r •ti •.:„. •
. •-,"F-_•.:/'\n e.; t
/::( .. g =�• -- ) , ',I• \// K!-�:1-1-,;; -i?? r 3`,•Zp• :ji-'4;51'1' rv/,y I :i"t •.
( 1 .. , l'I 'r 1'�11:'.j(f,,,';:, a M+J\•�?'f1A — `:� I ,
1 ' 0....,..p..%. :.....,. (,,,,,) , I L "; *\ dl .•' 1 1 55hh II lCr;) C.i / •• •,• il t:7) 04`) iiii 7
... II
3 l ; +� �° ! J / �; ti d I I' I.II;, a -=- _- _--- -II' l�) III I I
<t \ \ • \ ( 1 \•,• ��. / �(/ r //i / � 1p; ter= �I, :;�i
p
`S ••` ' w\ �� A `.,\ A�Vi n`^.4/„!% / j4 r'i/ a I ;i�ll 1 ,"`) " •▪7�....ily i�( u�
` l `, \ .�" J • \ ,ti j"•/ 1.�' \`II 1,I I�p `../ �-'\� •�r 1���,. 1 I I I'
? , ( u• ) < ▪Q▪ > I '•ii�a `• .` ••v•Ii ISM r r p II (") ('")
\ I: 1 • ' • •((ui) , J•\ I. '"-.. ,•.«tp i II It... .- 1'I 11 1 I07. 1 I _ -- -_ �•I
. 1 ..:47
Ad .ror -- A ' 6�.- - r II
• �/ - : -, I 7Jid / t ,n+ '1 l --d :—
-- J:r S , Ll 1 . i. _. — —
� -
•0�,
!Fin .-Ihi Qv ....m. 0 (.4---1-.) •,..,___:,---,)
I.
\ i • I -
z ,E 9 Opp b M ,,,• q•)1 S�___�L__---_ . '=J° a'
` 1 %Y
6, esi.,.,z 4.,ds y(z _ -—_ _
av'(rad!d 0 p,votrOD

RATING SCALE FOR CLASSIFICATION OF WATER POLLUTION CONTROL SYSTEMS
Name of Facility: mil 11 ' c r J. 1' p , ',
Owner or Contact Person: .1'fr • `c «,-( - L- U t Oj a� Fo---
Mailing Address: tl•c . (4l Y.Y -S' r f%<.,��,� C-'� 3c s�k
County: 0 ;;I . _ Telephone: ' o %.,›Icj s/- 3
Present Classification: New Facility Existing Facility
NPDES Per. No. NC00 Nondisc. Per. No.WQ OOC'/ ?ill Health Dept.Per No.
Rated by: . • l IC Telephone: 7 7/— s7C o c Date: o %t.S -i
Reviewed by: Health Dept. Telephone:
Regional Office Telephone:
Central Office Telephone:
ORC: Fo.v-c L a ; 3�� Grade: .Y Telephone: 9/cot 9Y'-5 7.?7
Check Classification(s): Subsurface c, Spray Irrigation Land Application
Wastewater Classification: (Circle One) I 11 III IV Total Points: _3 C,
IN-PLANT PROCESSES AND RELATED CC*11 OL EOUIPMENT WHICH ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION SHALL NOT BE
CONSIDERED WASTE TREATMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF CLASSIFICATION ALSO SEPTIC TANK SYSTBAS CONSISTINC3 ONLY OF SEPTIC TAN(
AND GRAVITY MTRIFiCATION LINES ARE EXEMPT FROM CLASSIFICATION
SI SSLJFACE CLASSIFICATION SPRAY IRRIGATION CLASSIFICATION
(check all units that apply) (shed'all units that apply)
1. septic tanks 1, preliminary treatment (definition no. 32 )
2. pump tanks
3`-siphon or pump-dosing systems 3, septic tanks
1, sand fitters 4 pump tanks
•
5. grease trap/interceptor 5, V pumps
6, owwater separators 6 sand finer:
7, gravity subsurface treatment and disposal: 7 grease trap/mterceptor
8. pressure subsurface treatment and disposal: 8, / oil/water separators
9 disinfection
10, ✓ chemical addition for nutrient/algae control
11, "" spray inigation of wastewater
In addition to the above classifications, pretreatment of wastewater In excess of these components shell
be rated using the point rating system and will require an operator with an appropriate dual certification.
LAND APPLICATiON/RESIDLIALS CLASSIFICATION(Applies only to permit holder)
1. Land application d biosolids,residuals or contaminated soils on a designated site.
WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY CLASSIFICATION
•
The following systems shall be assigned a Class I classification,tiniest the flow is of a significant quantity or the technology is unusually
complex,to require consideration by the Commission on a case-by-case basis: (Check If Appropriate)
1, Oil/water Separator Systems consisting only of physical separation,pumps and disposal;
2. Septic Tank/Sand Finer Systems consisting only of septic tanks, dosing apparatus, pumps,sand filters,disinfection
and duel discharge;
9, Lagoon Systems consisting only d preliminary treatment.lagoons,pumps,disinfection,necessary chemical treatment for
algae or nutrient control,and direct discharge;
4. Closed-bop Recyde Systems;
5. Groundwater Remediatlon Systems consisting only d oMwater separators, pumps,air-stripping,carbon adsorption,disinfection
and disposal;
6. Aquaculture operations with discharge to surface waters;
Water Plant sludge handling and balk-wash water treatment; •
J, Seafood processing consisting of screening and disposal.
9 Single-family discharging systems,with the exception d Aerobic Treatment Units,will be classified if permitted titer July 1.
1003 or If upon Inspection by the Division,I is found that the system is not being adequately operated or maintained. Such
systems will be notified of the classification or reclassification by the Commission, In writing.

The following scale is i for rating wastewater fa s'. (circle appropriate points)
•
ITEM POWS
(1) industrial Pretreatment Units or industrial Pretreatment Program(roe definition No.33)........-......----------4 .
(2) DESIGN FLOW OF PLANT IN gpd(not amicable to non-contaminated cooing waters.'Wags handing facilities for --.,
water purification plants,totally closed cycle systerns(see definition No.11),and facilities consisting only of kern
(4Xd) or items (4)(d) and (11)(d)) •
0 - 20.000 ..1 J
60.001 - 100.000.---------.---------------------_.a
100.001 - 250,000.. .A
250.001 -
1.000.001 - 2,000,000..---.-- -.....
2,000,1Xil (and up) rats 1 point additional far each-200. ,000 gpd capacity up to a maximum oF..--_3 0
Design Flow (gpd)________
(a) PRELIMINARY UNfTS/PFCCESSES(see dslinition No.32)
(a) Bar Sawn* .t .
Or
(b) Mechanical Screens.Static Screens or Comminuting Devk:es .2
(a) Grit ROMN111. .1
or
(d) Mechanical or Mrated Gra Removal
(a) Flow Mmeurtg Device ..-4)
Of
(I) Instrumented Flow MeasuremenL.- .------2
(9)
(h) influent Flow EquariZiOn. 2
(I) Grams or Oil Separators - Gravity--
Mochanical. —.------------------.---.----
Dissohed Air-F:Gralron—
(1) Prechlorination. — 3
(4) PRIAARYTREATMENT tkifTSPFOCESSES
(a) Septic Tank (see definition No. 43)- 2
(b) . Imhoff Tank.-------.-------------.—. .5
(c) Primary Clarillors. .-.5
(d) Settling Ponds or Settling Tanks for inorganic Non.toxlc Materials(sludge handling facilities for water
purification plans,sand,gravel stone.and other mining operations except recreational activities such as gem
or gold mining). 2
(5) SECONDARY T ,TWENT LNTS/PROCESSES
(a) Carbonaceous Stage
(I) Aoration-HIgh Purity Oxygen System. '0
Diffused Air System.......--*----- ----- -- —. . 1 0
Mechanical Air System (fixed. floating or rotor) A
Separate Sludge Remotion. a
(II) Tdciding liter
High Rate.. .7
Standard Rate......------.----. 5
Packed Tower- 5
(III) Biological Aerated Filter or Aerated Biological Filter
POAerated Lagoons-- ---.--...................-----------a
(v) Rotating Biological Contactors .1 0
(v1) Sand Filters -intermittent biological .2
Recirculating biological. ..3
• (vD) Stabilization Lagoons 5
Mg Clerifier. .5
(ix) Single stage system for combined carbonaceous removal 01 BOO and nitrogenous removal by
nitrification(see definition No. 12XPoirds for this kern have to be in addition to items
(5)(a)(1) through (5)(a)(vill).
utilizing the extended aeration process(see definition No.3a) -----------2
utilizing other than the extended aeration proms& --II
(x) Nutrient additions to enhance BOO removal-------------5
(xl) Biological Culture (*Super Bugs)addition.--------------------5
(b) Nitrogenous Stags _
(I) Aeration- High Purity Oxygen System. '0
Diffused Air System 1 0
Mechanical Air System (find, floating or rotor) A
Separate Skrdge Remotion. —3
(II) Trickling Filter-High Rate 7
Standard Rate.............----- 5
Packed Tamar- s
PI Biological Aerated Filter or Aerated Biological Filter- .10
(k) Rotating Biologics/ Contactors .10
(v) Sand Filter-intsrmktent biological --2
Recirculating biological. -------.3
(14) gaffer.. . -.- ----------------A
(6) TEMARY OR ADVAhICED TFEA-1111,11 Liiiiiiii5OiSiES. ,
(a) Activated Carbon Beds-
without carbon regeneratIon.--------- .5
with carbon regeneration...---------------- ...1 5
(b) Powdered or Granular Activated Carbon Feed.
without carbon regenoration.------- — .5 •
with carbon regeneration —
(c) Air stripping ...................._______
(d) Denitrffication Process —41 s ,
(0) Eloctrodialysis.. ••••••••••••••••••••••••.•••••••••••••••••••••400.•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••5 . )
(I) Foam Separation- — — ....... .5
(9) Ion &chant". •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •••••••••••••••••••••••5
(h) Land Application of Treated Effluent(se*definition No.22b)(rot appikable for sand,gravel steno
and other similar mining operations)by high rate Infiltration..—
(I) Microscreens.-.
(1) Phosphorous Removal by Biological Procures(See definition No.213)-.------__----. 20
(k) Polishing Ponds - without aeration....
with aeratIOn•••••••••••••••.••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •••••••••••••••••••••••••.••••••••••••••••••S

(I) Post Aeration ;a
emir 2 1L
(m) Reverse Owls 2
sm
5
(n) Sand or Mixed-Media Filters - low rate....._...._........._....»...»...._...._....................»....»..............._........._ 2
(o) Treatment high rate .5
processes for removal of metal or cyanide 15
(p) treatment processes for removal of toxic materials other than metal or cyanide...„ ._...__.__.»..._........»_.»15
• (7) SLL ETREATMe lT
(a) Sludge Digestion Tank - Heated (anaerobic) 10
Aerobic 5
Unheated(anaerobic) 3
(b) Sludge Stabilization(chemical or thermal) .5
•
(c) Sludge Drying Beds-Gravity ,-, 2
Vacuum Assisted 5
(d) Sludge Elutrlatbn
(e) Sludge Conditioner (chemical or thermal) 5
(1) Sludge Thickener (gravity) 5
(g) Dissolved Air Rotation Unit (not 5
applicable to a unit rated as (3)(i)J 8
(h) Sludge Gas Utilization (Including gas storage) ,., 2
(I) Sludge Holding Tank - Aerated 5
Non-aerated 2
(j) Sludge Incinerator(not Including activated carbon regeneration) 10
(k) Vacuum Miter, Centrifuge,or Filter Press or other similar dewatering devices..______. __....__10
(8) RESIDUALS UTILIZATION/DISPOSAL(inducing Incinerated ash)
(a) Lagoons 2
(b) •Land Application(surface and subsurface)(see definition 22a)
by contracting to a land application operator or landfill operator who holds the land application permit
or landfil permit 2
( ) (c) dicated Landfill(burial) by the permittee of the wastewater treatment facility..._.._..... ....._..»._........._._ 5
9 DISNECTEN
(a) Chlorination.._......
.5
(b)
(C) Ozone
riration. ....„.
5
-- 5
(d) Radiation 5
(10) CHEMICAL ADDITION SYSTEM(S)(see definition No.9)(rot applicable to chemical additions rated as Item(3)(1),
(5)(a)(xi). (6)(a), (6)(b), (7)(b). (7)(e1, (9a), (9)(b) or (9)(c) 6 points each: .
List flue_r -7 1'v i c..Cac.i.
f
• 5
(1 1) MISCELIJNEOUS UNITS/PROCESSES 5
(a) Holding Ponds,Holding Tanks or Settling Ponds for Organic or Toxic Materials including wastes from mining
operations containing nitrogen or phosphorus compounds in amounts significantly greater than is common 1
for domestic wastewater �sJ
(b) Effluent Flow Equalization(not applicable to storage basins which are inherent in land application systems)__3
(c) Stage Discharge (not applicable to storage basins inherent in land application systems)»..._-.--..._.__..,.
(d) Pumps _. »..»..-............ 3
(e) Stand-By Power Supply _..._................................._..............»..........
(i) Thermal Pollution Control Device . .. '--" 3..
TOTAL POINTS '.--. .
CLASSFICATiON
Class I 5-25 Points
ss 1:............... -. 26.50 Points
»--.- 51-65 Points
OW...........................,,............................-....»....... . ......-...66-Up Points
•
Facilities having a rating of one through four points,Inclusive,do not require a certified operator.
Facilities having an activated sludge process wit be assigned a minimum classification of Class II.
Facilities having treatment processes for the removal of metal or cyanide will be assigned a minimum classification of Class IL
Facilities having treatment processes for the biological removal of phosphorus will be assigned a minimum classification of Class III. -
.0004 DEFNriIONS
The following definitions shall apply throughout this Subchapter.
(1)Activated Carbon Beds. A physfcaVchemical method for reducing soluble organic material from wastewater effluent;The-column-type beds used In this
method will have a flow rate varying from two to eight gallons per minute per square foot and may be either upflow or downflow carbon beds. Carbon may or
may not be regenerated on the wastewater treatment plant site;
(2)Aerated Lagoons. A basin in which all solids are maintained In suspension and by which biological oxidation or organic matter is reduced through artificially
accelerated transfer of oxygen on a flow-through basis;
(3)Aeration. A process of bringing about Intimate contact between air or high purity oxygen In a liquid by spraying, agitation or dflusbn(3a)Extended
Aeration. An activated sludge process utilizing a minimum hydraulic detention time of to hours.
(4)Agriculturally managed site. Any site on which a crop is produced,managed,and harvested(Crop includes grasses,grains,trees,etc.);
(5)Air Stripping. A process by which the ammonium Lon is first convened to dissolved ammonia(pH adjustment)with the ammonia then released to the
atmosphere by physical means;or other similar processes which remove petroleum products such as benzene,toluene,and xylene;
(6)Carbon Regeneration The regeneration of exhausted carbon by the use of a furnace to provide extremely high temperatures which volatilize and oxidize the
absorbed impurities;
(7)Carbonaceous Stage. A stage of wastewater treatment designed to achieve aeecondarr effluent limits;
(8)Centrifuge. A mechanical device in which centrifugal force is used to separate solids from liquids or to separate liquids of different derst,.as;
•
(9)Chemical Addition Systems-The addition of chemical(s)to wastewater at an application point for purposes of improving solids removal,pH adjustment,
.-'kathity control,etc.;the capability to experiment wIth afferent chemicals and afferent application points to achieve a specific result will be considered one
• item;the capability to add chemical(s)to dual units will be rated as one system;capability to add a chemical at a different application points for different
?urposes will result In the systems being rated as separate systems;
(10)Chemical Sludge Conditioning. The addition of a chemical compound such as lime,ferric chloride,or a polymer to wet sludge to coalesce the mass prior to
Its application to a dewatering device;
(11)Closed Cycle Systems, Use of holding ponds or holding tanks for containment of wastewater containing Inorganic,non-toxic materials from sand,gravel,
crushed stone or other similar operations.Such systems shall carry a maximum of two points regardless of pumping facilities or any other appurtenances;
(12)Combined Removal of Carbonaceous BOD and Nitrogenous Removal by Nitrification-A single stage system required to achieve permit effluent limits on BOO
and ammonia nitrogen within the same biological reactor,
(13)DecNorination. The penial or complete reduction of residual chlorine in a liquid by any chemical or physial process;
(14)Denitr licatlon Process. The conversion of nitrate-nitrogen to nitree.n ear

. . --.7-7-7-7*'':-4 • - - -: - - ' ' 0
*slop,
AlAr 30
A-44-r Alt d is ou r oyi,.-E- I/0-0 (li c a+
ec k,t-e5� r oki r'✓oJec-(- 1'I,1af )..5
Cull- / i►n-Ikoust or al ,
,.ctse finva,rd 4 k,s 0 k-
i,jq yi a it 1Ar5 ro .r
\6- 16411(1.• MAJ at 2--
06 3M- 50g3
K 574
512 N.Salisbury St. Raleigh NC 27604 Phone[phone]

ok.,uionial Pipeline Company
' Creating Excellence in Transportation Services
FARON D. LEIGH Telephone: [phone]
Mid-Atlantic District Environmental Technician Facsimile: 336-292-6462
•
Friday,May 03,2002 R E C E 1 V P D
N.C. Dept. of EHNR
NCDENR-Division of Water Quality MAY 2 1 2002
Non-Discharge Permitting Unit Winston-Salem
Attn: Kristen Miquez Sateen
1617 Mail Service Center RegionalO tf�G�
Raleigh,NC 27699-1617
SUBJECT: Spray Irrigation Permit Renewal Modification
Colonial Pipeline Company—Greensboro Facility
Guilford County,North Carolina
Permit No.WQ0006317
Dear Ms.Miquez,
As a follow-up to our recent telephone conversation,Colonial Pipeline Company respectfully requests a minor modification to the
subject non-dicharge permit. In an effort to enhance our treatment efficiency,we would like to modify our lagoon operation as
follows:
• Replace our current(6)six—3 to 5 horsepower units with(2)two — 10 horsepower units. Our consultant,Richard Siebert with
Aqua Tech in Richmond,Virginia advised that this would provide better mixing and increased oxygen supply. A copy of our
proposed configuration showing zones of influence is attached.
Also,our current permit identifies a 147,000-gallon lagoon that is no longer in operation and it states that we have 5.6 acres of spray
area with(24)twenty-four spray heads. In reality,we are using only 3.69 acres of spray area with(17)seventeen spray heads. The
smaller lagoon and the additional spray heads have not been in service for several years and there are no plans to reactivate either of
them. We request that they be removed from our new permit.
Colonial very much appreciates your assistance with this permit renewal and proposed modifications. If you have questions or require
additional information,please contact me at 336-294-9737 or at the letterhead address.
Sincerely, -
Faron D.Leigh
MAY 1 3 2032
attachments '.,JN-DISCHARGE PERMITTING
-- a
cc: Cedric L.Kline,Colonial Pipeline Company,Greensboro Operations Manager w/attachments
Jeff D.Titus,Colonial Pipeline Company,Mid-Atlantic District Environmental Project Manager w/attachments
411 Gallimore Dairy Road Greensboro,North Carolina 27409

. . 1 1 ; ; 1 " Hii111 " ii . H . 111111i ! - ! I . ; . : I ' . . •
: 1 •
I ' I • I i I 1 I- 1 .i , i I I i I I ! ,. I i I i ,
. iil . 1 j ! I I ' IM! :i . i . I . . i � �
. . . ... • I ' . ., . 1 ' re.; ; , : ' . 1-----. G(../ ----H ,
it j1 * ! ;� i I • i I
i . L i ! . I 1 ! '/I I 1 1 i 1 , I . I ! ! I . .� '. '\ _ I , . " • 1 1 •
• ____i.•
/ . 1 -�,o',,,,e_ion i)%.,rr-Lv Jl.c, I , i . .\, , rt moms O r.• I1.�Pt.V�c►.�Clez`- 1 .
: *, : • " , • ! � , , j • / . 1jII ,' • • !Ac AiHoDLL')I..- . :,9 ! : ! \; \ �tiAv,ur. Mope.. )ST'N18' .
' I 1 i • I
1 . " . • . . . , j : 11 okAeti..p..creT1 I 1 . .• I 1 1 1• . I• 1 . IN' ! . • ; V. :Mlx&ER; SY6'T' M I
. . . . ' ; : ; : i, " ! 1 i i1 . 1 I (f4PLI,CAT?Ot?' gppwt 7;Z ! i 1 ' I 1 ' 1 i` ' • CRNPt_��Mit?. /4PPLI 1
• I • • : I. ` ! j + I I ! !•PER. 1Nav,aoly• ' Lo►a.'�/-44 5Idlik.� i . ji.- p Mitooki • .9
• I . i , i 'r l i' 1 i H I1 1 I ! i l i i { ! I ' j i i i iii is { " ! i 1 i , I I A64•RR SrV 1) i
it I 1 •`' I Ii I I • l i l I •.� i i i Iii
al :i 1 1 ii I I 1 i .. . . 1 i ` ! ! 6
. i i 1 Mb�R1N(?� 1 , , 1•
• y ( ! ! ! : . ! I hi.:►j,1 ,Iiii1 . . 1 , i1 it ! , ; , j ; 1. i ! ! I
I1 I I j t ' 1 i { " I j 1 l ; . i i• t i• / I i . 1 .
11 : _ ' : 1II : ii 1 . Ii 1 . il .II II . , I I •I ! . ' . , ! . �; . { . i I
• i F li 1 , , 1 , j ,
. 1 . 1, • . . . . \ . . I \ I 1 : j i 1• .1.1 i -1 I 1 ; 1 1 . . 1 I ' . i ' . 1 . - 1 /. %, • . , earft31..E .E�.c''9. 'Kh
' � ; I . 111I . i1 .I ; I1 : ! ' , i i1 ' ! :c�,�'lts . .
1 i j I : i )• 1 : j 1 I ; I I •i . i I I1 , I I i •
i 11 I Inc `� j + I.
I
1i , , : : 1 i1 \i' . . i. \: i 1 I ' 1 • I1 . 1 i1 ' , i : ' , 1 • I ; : • : • I
1 , ' \. ' i ':`' 1 ' ! ! ' ' ' ' • ' ' I I . • I I /'/i I A I Y
: : Ii . ! 1 I1 1 ,
. ' : I ! I . i ' I 11 ` , , . . , 11 � j1 . ; 1 - • , ; ' IT: ; I , ; i ' , : . . .._�___ �1-- • 1
• + I i\1 ,.. II ! /
1 i I I i I I 1 i _ , �� I I !':' i:I ! I ! I\ I r t I... . �1- - irrrr
i_Li I 1• 17. 1 I i l ; i l 1 I i1 1 I I ., ' ' 7. ,-. ; II .
bN, 130:1 ! ; , ►1
• . C. L.51.P..DL.' . • ' 1 ti 8c ' iap, .W1iaiiNwi F m. � 1 II.-; I I I I i , ' . 1 � ,
� ; I ! i 1 � 1 I 9 I ., t ! I � I •
cP A Q I 1 1 '1 1 a�i i 1 i ; : • ! . . ; •1 1 I I 1 ! 1 • , 1 . If11 i : 1 I . I . ' .!. 11 _ .rht I 1 i 1. I .I I i i � I ,
r : I ! ; . 1 , I , i ! I1II . ii I . Ij 1 I 1 ` 1 ` I ' ; i : . I 1
1 i I 11 ! ' I 11 I ! I i Will :
II ! IIII ; ' i .
-� I i `
1 1 - i ! 1 I 1 1 I { 1 I I ! i ' I i , ! ; i 1 ! 1 _— •
I ' W.F./,�i.�.✓ _• ' 7
m IL : HII ; I
! 1 11 i1 ' 1 ! 1111 ' 1 I.. " i I ii ; 1I1 , II I I1 1 _ I1 . 11 ' ! , ' II . 1W , I . . . II 1I1 ! 1 .
r-pi , i 1 � ' I I I . ii � oI; I I � � I I I I ; i 1 ii �il f Ii' I . 11 , iH
' j ! 1 . I I ( 1 i •• • I
1 I , i I : Q? GAt�t� �1 �As l .. i W'IrN ' R.7+'1 /NC. 1
. ' •. • . ' 1 I I i ' ' i 1 I i _ • 1 I I I 1 I 1 �'i is v i 1 ' I 1 , .I I •wi 1 ! i : ,....-.+ i f I . 1 , 1 .1' '

1 1D:UJ Laptev .ate 110. ..�-•• ------- -. —• - .__
•
ilu..,,.
' AQUA- MixAer
• � SYSTEM SPECIFICATIONo SHEET
• .
. .
' .1 AQUA MODEL 1 OTM8 MixAer SYSTEM
'MORE THAN JUST AN AERATOR'
PERFORMANCE DATA
A) Horsepower Rating 10 HP @ 880 RPM
B) Flow Rate Through Device - 7,476 GPM
C) Discharge Velocity of Issue 16.5 FPS
D) Zones of Influence for Basins with 10' Liquid Depth:
LIQUID SOLIDS COMPLETE MIX UNIFORM OXYGEN
CONCENTRATION DIAMETER DISPERSION
ma/1 MLSS FEET DIAMETER- FEET
Clean Water Not Applicable 188
Up to 500 107 • 181
Up to 1,000 75 175
Up to 3,000 62 143
Up to 6,000 53 124
Up to 10,000 48 111
E) Oxygen Transfer Capability:
1) The oxygen transfer rate for the Aqua MixAer System increases as the amount of surface area
available in the basin increases. See the Oxygen Transfer Graph for the actual transfer rate at
standard conditions for your application.
2) Industry standard oxygen transfer rate using the unsteady state test method in a test tank with
excessive cobalt ion concentrations will produce a standard oxygen transfer rate of 4.0 pounds of
oxygen per horsepower hour with this model.
UNIT WEIGHTS AND DIMENSIONS
r LEGEND PESCRIPTION PIMENSIONS
1• _0
r
MST Minimum Skin Thickness Acceptable 1/4'
on Structure of Device
F Float Diameter Supporting Unit t34"
H Height of Complete Assembled Aqua 80"
7.--(--t--1
*I li ubmer Snce m DS Submergence Depth of Floating Aqua 41'
a MixAer System
1 �� '-TR_ E Elevation of Discharge Deflector Above 10'
I FIST Basin Surface
D Diameter of Discharge Deflector 51'
I.
R/ ;; R Radius of Turn on Discharge Deflector 20'
T Throat Diameter of Device at Propeller 15-3/4'"
T s Location
P Propeller Drive Shaft Diameter 2-3/8"
RFC Reserve Flotation Capacity of Aqua 651 lbs.
MixAer System
11__ ( AUW Assembled Unit Weight of Device 880 lbs.
GSW Gross Shipping Weight of Unit 1.150 lbs. -
(November. 1990)
MAY 1 3 2002
--,NLr:SCHARGE PERMITTN

O�OF VVATF9Q Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
C North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
5 -c Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
RECEIVED
June 26, 2002
.C. Dept. U EHNR
FARON D. LEIGH, MID-ATLANTIC DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNICI �UN
COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANY I 2 7 2002
411 GALLIMORE DAIRY ROAD
GREENSBORO, NC 27409 Winston-Salem
Subject: Permit No. WQ 006,51 9iC`�i%il office
Additional Information Request
Colonial Pipeline Company—Greensboro Terminal
Wastewater Spray Irrigation Facility
Guilford County
Dear Mr. Leigh:
The Non-Discharge Permitting Unit has conducted a preliminary review of the subject permit renewal and
modification request. Additional information is required before we may continue our review. Please address the
following items no later than July 26, 2002.
1. The renewal application lists Mr. Tom J. Guzikowski, General Manager of Operations, as the
signing official (Item 1.2), however Mr. Faron Leigh has signed the application. Please note that in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0206(b), applications shall be signed as follows:
a. in the case of corporations, signature is required by a principal executive officer of at least
the level of vice president, or his duly authorized representative;
b. in the case of a partnership, by a general partner and in the case of a limited partnership,
by a general partner;
c. in the case of a sole proprietorship, by the proprietor;
d. In the case of a municipal, state, or other public entity, a signature is required by either a
principal executive officer, ranking elected official or other duly authorized employee.
Please provide either a revised application that has been signed by a principal executive officer of
the company as required above or a letter from that official that indicates you are authorized to
sign the application on the company's behalf.
2. Please provide three (3) copies of an updated scaled facility map (scale no greater than 1":100').
The map shall include the following:
a. The location and identity of each monitoring well.
b. The location of the spray irrigation fields. Denote the spray irrigation fields that are to be
abandoned.
c. The location of the lagoons. Denote the lagoon that is to be abandoned.
d. The location of all wells, pits, quarries, springs, lakes, ponds, or other surface drainage
features within 500 feet of the waste treatment/disposal sites.
e. The location of any property boundaries within 500 feet of the disposal area(s).
f. The date the map is prepared and/or revised.
Please note that comments from the Regional Office and the Groundwater Section are pending at this time, and
additional requests may be necessary following receipt of these comments. Please be aware that you are
responsible for meeting all requirements set forth in North Carolina rules and regulations. Any oversights that
occurred in the review of the subject application are still the responsibility of the applicant. Any omissions made in
responding to the above items may result in future requests for additional information. •+�+�
Non-Discharge Permitting Unit Internet httpJ/h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ndpu f e t'r'
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
DENR Customer Service Center Telephone [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Action Employer 50%recycled/10%post-consumer paper

Faron Leigh
June 26, 2002
Page 2
Please reference the subject permit application number when providing the requested information. All revised
and/or additional documentation should be signed, dated, and submitted to my attention at the address below.
Please note that failure to provide this additional information on or before the above requested date may result in
your application being returned as incomplete.
If you have any questions regarding this request, please do not hesitate to contact me at [phone],
extension 524. Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
Kristin E. Miguez
Environmental Technician
Non-Discharge Permitting Unit
Cc:
Brian wa erSection—Centralice
Tom J. Guzikowski, Colonial Pipeline Company
Permit File W00006317

State of North Carolina Agyis,
Department of Environment A . .
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality .
Michael F. Easley, Governor NCDENR
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph D., Acting Director NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
January 14. 2002
COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANY
TOM GUZIKOWSKI
P.O. BOX 1624
ALPHARETTA, GA 30009
Subject: Acknowledgement of Applition-Ne.,; .r n
WQ0006317 `
Spray Irrigation Systerii N R
Guilford County J� ' ��QZ
Dear Mr. Guzikowski:
The Non-Discharge Permitting Unit of the Division of Water Quality(Division)ackno e3 'eipi i e m
your permit application and supporting materials on January 9, 2002. This application FiegtieFtiallxiaf f ife
assigned the number listed above.
Your application package has been assigned to Shannon Thornburg for a detailed review. The reviewer
will contact you with a request for additional information if there are any questions concerning your
submittal.
If you have any questions, please contact Shannon Thornburg at 919-733-5083 extension 353. If the
reviewer is unavailable, you may leave a message on their voice mail,and they will respond promptly.
PLEASE REFER TO THE ABOVE APPLICATION NUMBER WHEN MAKING INQUIRIES
ON THIS PROJECT.
Sincerely,
f'"Kim H. Colson, P.E.
Supervisor,Non-Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: \ ,. _ I ion
Permit Application File WQ0006317
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/10%post-consumer paper

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment 4 and Natural Resources ,r
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary NCDENR
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph D., Acting Director NORT e"CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RF.SQ1JRCES
N. •.
January 14, 2002
COLONIAL PIPELINE CO. AN 1 S 2502
TOM GUZIKOWSKI
P.O. BOX 1624
ALPHARETTA GA 30009 ��lt;,
R4'v3 O
Subject: Acknowledgement of Application No.
WQ0006317
Spray Irrigation Disposal Systems
Guilford County
Dear Mr. Guzikowski:
The Non-Discharge Permitting Unit of the Division of Water Quality(Division)acknowledges receipt of
your permit application and supporting materials on January 09, 2002. This application package has
been assigned the number listed above.
Your application package has been assigned to Kristin Miguez for a detailed review. The reviewer will
contact you with a request for additional information if there are any questions concerning your
submittal.
If you have any questions,please contact Kristin Miguez at 919-733-5083 extension 524. If the
reviewer is unavailable,you may leave a message on their voice mail, and they will respond promptly.
PLEASE REFER TO THE ABOVE APPLICATION NUMBER WHEN MAKING INQUIRIES ON
THIS PROJECT.
Si erely, -
lm H. Colson,P.E.
Supervisor,Non-Discharge Permitting Unit
cc: Winston-Salem Regional Office,Water Quality Section
Permit Application File WQ0006317
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50%recycled/10%post-consumer paper

,
Colonial Pipeline Company
Creating Excellence in Transportation Services
FARON D. LEIGH Telephone: [phone]
Environmental Technician Facsimile: 336-294-3192
Monday,January 08,2001
N.c� , cl1/
NCDENR Dept °f EHNR
Winston-Salem Regional Office .1A N • Q ZOn
Water Quality Section •
@inStOrl '
585 Waughtown Street 9l p (le
Winston-Salem,NC 27107 nil OffiCe
Subject: Spray Irrigation Permit No.—WQ00063I7
Colonial Pipeline Company—Greensboro, Guilford County
Annual Composite Spray Field Soil Analyticals
Enclosed are two(2)copies of the analytical results from our annual soil-sampling event. If you have any
questions or require any additional information, please contact me at the letterhead address or at(336)294-
9737. Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
"Ov,
Faron D. Leigh
cc: Jack E. Williams, CPC District Environmental Project Mgr. (w/enclosures)
PLEASE NOTE: NEW MAILING ADDRESS
Colonial Pipeline Company
411 Gallimore Dairy Road
Greensboro,NC 27409
411 Gallimore Dairy Road Greensboro,North Carolina 27409

SKJ Environmental, Inc. Page 1 of 1
ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANY
Date 12/26/00 Laboratory Supervisor Approval:
Report No. 12214 Sample Matrix
Customer ID CP-GREEN [ ] Water
Client Mr. Faron Leigh [ X ] Soil
Project Greensboro [ ] Other Greg Jones, Laboratory Manager
Date Collected 11/29/00
Date Received 11/30/00
Composite#1 Composite#2 Composite#3
Field Sample No. (SF-1-6) (SF-7-11) (SF-12-17)
Laboratory Sample No. 00111630 00111631 00111632 Analytical Date of
Parameters Method Analysis
pH,s. u. 7.54 7.97 8.08 90458 12/14/2000
Conductivity, umhos/cm(1) 2,250 1,560 2,490 _ _ 120.1 Mod. 12/26/2000
Total Calcium, mg/kg dw 1,510 2,440 10,400 6010E 12/19/2000
Total Magnesium, mg/kg dw 1,420 1,210 2,400 _ , 8010E 12/19/2000
Total Sodium, mg/kg dw 881 410 635 _ 6010B 12/19/2000
Total Antimony, mg/kg dw <6.05 <5.77 <5.72 6010E 12/19/2000
Total Arsenic, mg/kg dw 20.2 19.8 18.1 6010B 12/19/2000
Total Cadmium, mg/kg dw <1.51 <1.44 <1.43 6010E 12/19/2000
Total Lead, mg/kg dw <15.1 <14.4 <14.3 6010E 12/19/2000
Total Nickel, mg/kg dw 8.08 11.0 11.0 60108 12/19/2000
QUALITY CONTROL RESULTS SUMMARY _
Analytical Laboratory
Parameter Sample No. Blank RPD,% PR,% ,
pH,s. u. _ 00111630 - 0.5 -
Conductivity, umhos/cm(1) 00111631 - 0 -
Total Calcium, mg/kg dw LCS 3139 , <1.25 0.7 109 ,
Total Magnesium, mg/kg dw _ LCS 3139 <1.25 2.7 101 _
Total Sodium, mg/kg dw LCS 3139 <2.50 1.2 118
Total Antimony, mg/kg dw LCS 3139 <5.00 0.9 108
Total Arsenic, mg/kg dw LCS 3139 <1.25 1.9 106
Total Cadmium, mg/kg dw LCS 3139 <0.125 _ 0.9 107
Total Lead, mg/kg dw LCS 3139 <1.25 0.9 _ 107
Total Nickel, mg/kg dw LCS 3139 0.125 0.9 108
RPD= Relative percent difference LCS= Laboratory Control Sample biank6.xls
PR=Percent Recovery (1)Saturated soil paste extract.

SKJ Environmental, Inc. Page 1 of 1
ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
• COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANY
Date 12/26/00
Laboratory Supervisor Approval:
Report No. 12214 Sample Matrix
Customer ID CP-GREEN [ ] Water
Client Mr. Faron Leigh [ X ] Soil
Project Greensboro [ ] Other Greg Jones, Laboratory Manager
Date Collected 11/29/00
Date Received 11/30/00
IComposite#1 Composite#2 Composite#3
Field Sample No. (SF-1-6) (SF-7-11) (SF-12-17)
Laboratory Sample No. 00111630 00111631 00111632 Analytical Date of
rarameters Method Analysis
pH, s. u. 7.54 7.97 8.08 9045E 12/14/2000
Conductivity, umhos/cm(1) 2,250 1,560 2,490 120.1 Mod. 12/26/2000
Total Calcium, mg/kg dw 1,510 2,440 10,400 6010B 12/19/2000
Total Magnesium, mg/kg dw 1,420 1,210 2,400 I 6010E 12/19/2000
Total Sodium, mg/kg dw 881 410 635 6010B 12/19/2000
Total Antimony, mg/kg dw <6.05 <5.77 <5.72 6010E 12/19/2000
Total Arsenic, mg/kg dw 20.2 19.8 18.1 6010E 12/19/2000
Total Cadmium, mg/kg dw <1.51 <1.44 <1.43 6010B 12/19/2000
Total Lead, mg/kg dw <15.1 <14.4 <14.3 6010B 12/19/2000
Total Nickel, mg/kg dw 8.08 11.0 11.0 _ , 6010E 12/19/2000
QUALITY CONTROL RESULTS SUMMARY
Analytical Laboratory
Parameter Sample No. Blank RPD,% PR,%
pH,s. u. 00111630 - 0.5 -
Conductivity, umhos/cm(1) 00111631 - 0 -
Total Calcium, mg/kg dw LCS 3139 <1.25 0.7 109 `
Total Magnesium, mg/kg dw LCS 3139 <1.25 2.7 101
Total Sodium, mg/kg dw LCS 3139 <2.50 1.2 116
Total Antimony, mg/k9 dw LCS 3139 <5.00 0.9 108
Total Arsenic, mg/kg dw LCS 3139 <1.25 1.9 106
Total Cadmium, mg/kg dw LCS 3139 <0.125 0.9 107
Total Lead, mg/kg dw LCS 3139 <1.25 0.9 107
Total Nickel, mg/kg dw LCS 3139 0.125 0.9 108
RPD= Relative percent difference LCS= Laboratory Control Sample blank6.xls
PR=Percent Recovery (1) Saturated soil paste extract.

Colo iial Pipeline Company
Creating Excellence in Transportation Services
FARON D. LEIGH Telephone: [phone]
Environmental Technician Facsimile: 336-294-3192
Tuesday,January 11,2000
NCDENR ` 'E i V E Q
Winston-Salem Regional Office ept. C,' '-I
Water Quality Section 3Qy 1 $ 2000
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem,NC 27107 Wi n S t` `'• '-
Regis,;:.; _t , ce
Subject: Spray Irrigation Permit No.—WQ0006317
Colonial Pipeline Company—Greensboro, Guilford County
Annual Composite Spray Field Soil Analyticals
Enclosed are two(2) copies of the analytical results from our annual soil-sampling event. If you have any
questions or require any additional information, please contact me at the letterhead address or at(336)294-
9737. Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
Faron D. Leigh
cc: Jack E. Williams, CPC District Environmental Project Mgr. (w/enclosures)
411 Gallimore Dairy Road Greensboro,North Carolina 27409
P.O.Box 18403 Greensboro,North Carolina 27419

RSONS ENGINEERING SCIENCE, INC. Page 1 of 2
ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANY
Date 1/5/00
Report No. 11410 Sample Matrix
Job No. 724262 [ ] Water
Client Mr. Faron Leigh [ x] Soil
Project Greensboro [ ] Other
Date Collected 11/30/99
Date Received 12/1/99
Composite#1 Composite#2 Composite#3
Field Sample No. (SF 1-6) (SF 7-11) (SF 12-17)
Laboratory Sample No. 99121019 99121020 99121021 Analytical Date of
Parameters Method Analysis
pH, s.u. 6.79 6.72 7.56 9045B 12/7/99
Conductivity, umhos/cm (1) 121 250 690 120.1 Mod. 12/20/99
T. Calcium, mg/kg dw 1,450 1,900 6,130 6010B 12/16/99,1/5/00
T. Magnesium, mg/kg dw 1,110 1,360 4,940 6010B 12/16/99,1/5/00
T. Sodium, mg/kg dw 818 521 662 6010B 12/16/99,1/5/00
T. Antimony, mg/kg dw <5.92 <5.67 <5.77 6010B 12/16/99,1/5/00
T. Arsenic, mg/kg dw 16.2 <14.2 <14.4 6010E 12/16/99,1/5/00
T. Cadmium, mg/kg dw <1.48 <1.42 <1.44 6010B 12/16/99,1/5/00
Lead, mg/kg dw 18.2 <14.2 <14.4 6010B 12/16/99,1/5/00
i. Nickel, mg/kg dw 15.2 14.2 26.0 6010B 12/16/99,1/5/00
(1)saturated soil paste extract.
blank4.xls

VS ENGINEERING SCIENCE, INC. Page 2 of 2
QUALITY CONTROL RESULTS SUMMARY
Date 1/5/00
Report No. 11410 Sample Matrix Laboratory Supervisor
Job No. 724262 [ ] Water
Client Mr. Faron Leigh [ x] Soil
Project Greensboro [ ] Other 4.....
Greg Jon La ratory Manager
I Laboratory Laboratory
Analytical Parameter Sample No. Blank RPD, % PR, % Analytical Parameter Sample No. Blank RPD, % PR, %
NH, s.u. 99121021 -- 0.3 --
Conductivity, umhos/cm (1) 99121020 -- 0 --
T. Calcium, mg/kg dw LCS 1940 <12.5 1.9 103
T. Magnesium, mg/kg dw LCS 1940 <1.25 3.7 94
T. Sodium, mg/kg dw LCS 1940 <12.5 2.3 104
T. Antimony, mg/kg dw LCS 1940 <2.50 2.7 96
T. Arsenic, mg/kg dw LCS 1940 <1.25 2.5 94
T. Cadmium, mg/kg dw LCS 1940 <0.125 2.4 101
T. Lead, mg/kg dw LCS 1940 <1.25 0.5 106
Nickel, mg/kg dw LCS 1940 <0.125 2.2 104
RPD= Relative Percent Difference
qc-0002.x1s
PR = Percent Recovery
LCS = Laboratory Control Sample

lion: • Return Original Faron D. Leigh Preservative
Results To:(Name) -- — _ — __ Ship To:
•
Colonial Pipeline Company Engineering — Science
Greensboro•
P.O. Box 18403 Attn: Greg Jones
Greensboro, NC 27419 2585 Chantilly Drive
plesl:(Signature,Name Company,Address-send copy of results) Atlanta, GA ' • 30324
�rn
Faron D. Leigh - -- --- _ _
Colonial Pipeline Company — Analyses— Required
P.O. Box 18403
Greensboro, NC 27419
4
1 1 Phone Number: (404) 325-5923
'c;rtacc Phone Number: (336) 294-9737 s .3 —
-- __ Airbifl Number: ��p?�,sf9dj/
i
-... Time `� Number - - . i ,
Sample Description 01 No y - Matrix Remarks
Conib:ners - " `1 \- . ,.
/--31-9 �3:a d 4,,, A. /*/ 6 �4r FclI /'6� � . k JY X X 1� X — i - —
//- 99 oZ= .5 • /ads 7 11) y
&1-59 / = 5 5 �'o��s * Af 3 (sp,,7 A-;4 / /72- - __ 1 x _X. x x x. Lr X.X_ X _.. - _ II
—------------ -
wished By: (Signature)
/�ate/Time Relinquished By: (Signature) Dale/Time Received For Laboratory By: (Signature) Dale/Time
ick121C�1(1.- tc)Z1 J 352212 '

ONS ENGINEERING SCIENCE, INC. Page 1 of 2
ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
COLONIAL PIPELINE COMPANY
Date 1/5/00
Report No. 11410 Sample Matrix
Job No. 724262
[ ] Water
Client Mr. Faron Leigh [ x] Soil
Project Greensboro [ ] Other
Date Collected 11/30/99
Date Received 12/1/99
1111 Composite#1 Composite#2 Composite#3
Field Sample No. (SF 1-6) (SF 7-11) (SF 12-17)
Laboratory Sample No. 99121019 99121020 99121021 Analytical Date of
Parameters Method Analysis
pH, s.u. 6.79 6.72 7.56 9045B 12/7/99
Conductivity, umhos/cm (1) 121 250 690 120.1 Mod. 12/20/99
T. Calcium, mg/kg dw 1,450 1,900 6,130 6010B 12/16/99,1/5/00
T. Magnesium, mg/kg dw 1,110 1,360 4,940 6010E 12/16/99,1/5/00
T. Sodium, mg/kg dw 818 521 662 6010B 12/16/99,1/5/00
T. Antimony, mg/kg dw <5.92 <5.67 <5.77 6010B 12/16/99,1/5/00
T. Arsenic, mg/kg dw 16.2 <14.2 <14.4 6010B 12/16/99,1/5/00
T. Cadmium, mg/kg dw <1.48 <1.42 <1.44 6010B 12/16/99,1/5/00
411PLead, mg/kg dw 18.2 <14.2 <14.4 6010E 12/16/99,1/5/00
Nickel, mg/kg dw 15.2 14.2 26.0 ' 6010B 12/16/99,1/5/00
(1)saturated soil paste extract. blank4.xls

PARSONS ENGINEERING SCIENCE, INC. Page 2 of 2
QUALITY CONTROL RESULTS SUMMARY
Date 1/5/00
Report No. 11410 Sample Matrix Laboratory Supervisor
Job No. 724262 [ ] Water
Client Mr. Faron Leigh [ x] Soil
Project Greensboro [ ] Other
Greg Jon La ratory Manager
ILaboratory Laboratory
Analytical Parameter Sample No. Blank RPD, % PR, % Analytical Parameter Sample No. Blank RPD, % PR, %
dH, s.u. 99121021 -- 0.3 --
Conductivity, umhos/cm (1) 99121020 -- 0
T. Calcium, mg/kg dw LCS 1940 <12.5 1.9 103
T. Magnesium, mg/kg dw LCS 1940 <1.25 3.7 94
T. Sodium, mg/kg dw LCS 1940 <12.5 2.3 104
T. Antimony, mg/kg dw LCS 1940 <2.50 2.7 96
T. Arsenic, mg/kg dw LCS 1940 <1.25 2.5 94
T. Cadmium, mg/kg dw LCS 1940 <0.125 2.4 101
T. Lead, mg/kg dw LCS 1940 <1.25 0.5 106
T. Nickel, mg/kg dw LCS 1940 <0.125 2.2 104
RPD = Relative Percent Difference
qc-0002.xis
PR = Percent Recovery
LCS= Laboratory Control Sample

—........• ....• r+w+i wig gb/' •acne UUU
• Return Original _Faron D, _ ___-Leigh_.-_ Preservative_ _ Ship To:
Results To:(Name)Cdon/al Pipeline Company — •
P.o. Box 18403 Engineering - Science
:' "' •
P.O. Box NC 27419 Attn: Greg Jones
aimplar(s):(Signature,Name Company,Address-send 2585 Atlanta,Cha GAillp Drive
Jcopy of results)
30324
Faroe D. Leigh ---
Colonial Pipeline Company — , Analyses Required
P.O. Box 18403 Ghtmensboro, NC 27419
Phone Number: (904) 325-5923
'cc tact Phone Number: (336) " 294-9737 - ' _ .3 -— ---- -
_ ' t Airblq Number. 'l 4,i-
l Time Sample Description Number \ i —
•
t
Conit.:ners
i Matrix Remarks
N PP ig=s 5 Caaasv , 3 (Sp,.�,,Vr /.t/72 - _ 1 x _X x x X X.X_ X -
►►
•
shed (Signature) — —
B :
y - ale/Time Relinquished By: (Signature) Dale/Time Received For Laboratory By:(Signature) Dale/Time
,,,,o
...4
4\uz_l U I9.- 3522 17%��'

Date November 6, 1986
APN00884
STAFF AND RECOMMENDATIONS _ `----
Coup _-2)
fi,ilfnrr
NON-DISCHAR Perpit No. 42flcR1 (RPnpwal1 to 4205R2
ngr. Gi}T—Vinzani
GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Facility and Addreaa: Colonial Pipeline Co. , Greensboro Junct. Tank Farm,
located off Gallimore Dairy Rd. , Greensboro, N.C. (P.O. Bx. 18403) 27419
J.D. Quakenbush, Jr. (919/292-0426) & J.E. Marder (919/292-7779). The applicant
was S.L. Smith, Colonial Pipeline Co. , P.O. Box 18855, Atlanta, N.C. 30326-0855
(404-261-1470)
2. Date of Investigation: October 24, 1986
3. Report Prepared fly: A. R. Hagstrom, Environmental Engineer, WSRO
EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This spray irrigation Permit No. 4205 is for the spray irrigation of treated tank
drainage waters (from leaded and unleaded gasoline storage tanks) and untreated drainage
water (from oil and kerosene storage tanks). Heavy sediment (tank bottoms) from the
kerosene and oil tanks is land applied per Permit No. 7923R . Heavy Sediment (tank
bottoms) from the leaded and unleaded gasoline tanks is carefully removed and disposed
of via a hazardous waste contractor (Caldwell Industries or equivalent). The permitted
spray irrigation sites and aerated treatment facility (for drainage water from
gasoline tanks) were inspected, and all areas observed appeared to be in compliance
and well maintained and operated. The quantity of wastewater requiring spray
application has been less than in the past, since the Company is controlling the
input to the pipeline closer from the various refiners and tankers and because
more tanks are being covered or are .getting better covers.
The WSRO recommends the renewal of this Permit with the following recommendations:
1. The cover crops ( now fescue) on the spray field shall be removed after cutting
and it should then be disposed of in a municipal landfill .
2. Appropriate monitoring should be specified as obtained from the Groundwater
Quality Section complete with a monitoring schedule including where
monitoring data shall be sent.
A copy of the WSRO Staff Report dated March 21, 1983, is attached to the SERG copy.
COPY TO: Q-d-QL ' ' ' s4woil (`/° P
Signature of repo preparer
GWQ -- W 20
SERG
WSRO
rWMTi?1T L`rr4c Uater Quality Rmdrt..... e..-_..__• _ _ _

,+Liter .1ual1Lv L-ucL:UL•
f Winston-Salem Regional Office
8003 Silas Creek Parkway Extension
Winston-Salem, N.C. 27106
REPORT OF Site Evaluation
Place visited Colonial Pipeline Company Date 3/21/83
Greensboro Junction Tank Farm
Address Gallimore Dairy Rd. ,Greensboro 27419 River Basin Cape Fear
BY Whom James C. Watson, Environ. Eng. Time Spent 6 hrs.
Persons Contacted Messers. Gary French, Area Manager; Carl R. Lieberman, Senior
Engineer; Phil H. Wall, Repair and Maintenance Super. , Colonial Pipeline Employees
Reason for Visit to conduct a site evaluation prior to issuance of a non-discharge
permit
Copies to:
Dale Crisp
Guilford County Health Dept.
WSRO tj
REPORT: The following Staff Report and Recommendations pertain to the site evaluation
conducted at Colonial Pipeline Company, Greensboro, Junction Tank Farm,
Guilford County, NC.
Part i II:SPECTION OF EXISTING WASTEWATER TREATMENT SITE
1. Location (Directions to Facility) : From Winston-Salem take I-40 east to
Greensboro; the site is located on the south side of I-40 on the western
edge of the City of Greensboro and is bordered on the west by Gallimore
Dairy Rd. (NCSR 1556) .
LUGS Map Extract Included, Map Sheet C19SW
Discharge Point: Latitude 36° 04' 05'
Longitude 79° 56 ' 38 "
Elevation MSL 860 Ft.

G-2-
. ,
2. Treatment:
Treatment will consist of the existing 147,000 gallon capacity aerated
lagoon with the addition of a new 257,800 gallon lagoon. The two spray
fields which the company plans to use consist of a 8 to 10 acre site and
a 15 to 18 acre site. These are all approximate numbers. Colonial
proposes that each sprayer on these spray irrigation sites be operated
twice each week for a period of approximately two hours (for a maximum
application rate of 0.244 inches per spray period) . In addition Colonial
plans to construct 2 feet high berms with 2/1 slopes around each spray
field.
3. Processes Served:
The wastewater which is collected in the lagoon is the water which was
contained in the 58 large storage tanks which has been separated from
the petroleum product. After the product is left to stand a couple of
days, the water settles out and is then run through an oil/water separator.
The product is stored in tanks 899 and 896 where it is held prior to
transfer to the aerated lagoon, prior to being sprayed on surrounding land.
Part II EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Evaluation
1. There is land available for expansion at this site location, as the
company owns approximately 320 acres.
2. This facility appears to be operating one of the better oil terminal
facilities within this area.
3. The ground cover within the spray area will be fescue which will
be kept mowed very low.
B. Recommendation
I recommend a permit be issued and the application be allowed to increase
the flow to the existing lagoon and add a second lagoon. All the above
is to be constructed and installed in accordance with an approved set of
plans and specifications.

U.S. Postal Service
CERTIFIED MAIL,., RECEIPT
D (Domestic Mail Only:No Insurance Coverage Provided)
ru
fl.I For delivery information vi.'t our websitl at www.usps.come
IU p•a e • •
U
-
Postage
t�Lb ry
t rl WNW
ru
Certified Fee ��
m
p Return Receipt Fee PostmarkFlra
p (Endorsement Required) MEMB28l111
31 Restricted Delivery Fee
(Endorsement Required)
/ �tc
O
m I(u Total Pestana R Fraac ; , 1 \
m SPS�
Sent To Jerry L. Drye, President
3treet,A Trinity American Corporation
or PO 601 Old Thomasville Road
cry,sra High Point, NC 27260
ctions

SENDER: COMPLETE THIS SECTION COMPLETE THIS SECTION ON DELIVERY
• Complete items 1,2,and 3.Also complete A. Signature
item 4 if Restricted Delivery Is desired. t' Agen
• Print your name and address on the reverse X 1 k. - •:dressee
so that we can return the card to you. B. Received by(Printed Name) C. Da :of 9-livery
• Attach this card to the back of the mailpiece,
or on the front if space permits. r • ; I
D. Is delivery address different from Item 1? ❑Yes
1. Article Addressed to:
If YES,enter delivery address below: ❑No
Jerry L. Drye, President
Trinity American Corporation
601 Old Thomasville Road 3. ice Type
High Point, NC 27260 el Certified Mail CI Express Mail
0 Registered ❑Return Receipt for Merchandise
0 Insured Mail 0 C.O.D.
4. Restricted Delivery?(Extra Fee) ❑Yes
2. 7008 3230 0003 2547 0220
PS Form 3811, February 2004 Domestic Return Receipt 3-- 9 -I I 102595-02-M-1540

•
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE First-Class Mail
111111 Postage&Fees Paid
LISPS
Permit No.G-10
• Sender: Please print your name, address, and ZIP+4 in this box •
Aquifer Protection Section
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem,NC 27107-2241