760005_Inspection_20191009

,A,,,,'„,_,......,_, :''
a s x ` -
_
Type of Visit: *Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: ct,
Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: I 16 q'(q Arrival Time: ��•�0 o� Departure Time: of County: Region: u)SI2.8
Farm Name: IA 5Wt 111E Owner Email:
Owner Name: 21 f a(1 4 'l ( r Phone:
Mailing Address: PO ( 3 b Ut J I Vc 91d' p
Physical Address: 5 2 2 G v haci f"R I t U 4•, ( I e, 14 c, 2' 1355
L.
Facility Contact: k (\& (3n f i rr Title: Phone: 31.,314-+^ gNg94-1-
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: / Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: V Certification Number:
No
Location of Farm: Latitude: O IN Li3�, Longitude: D 3-1 \ !1) b k,
Us yal(- s fi rS c � 9 © - EL) t shac jt-tt((ow .. .
W 0S krANGI, OM/lc-Ch. e-d .
;; � ►o,
;•Wean to Finish -- Layer Dai Cow --
Wean to Feeder �� Non Layer Dai Calf �� ss
` :11 Feeder to Finish Dai Heifer
v1 Farrow to Wean �71 �Nom , it •D Cow �� ..�
�Farrow to Feeder �� .i,, :,' w- , ,' , •Non-Dai `"
Farrow to Finish Beef Stocker �� _
•Gilts •Non-La ers °° 111 Beef Feeder
•Boars •Pullets •Beef Brood Cow 0
g ,i •Turke Poults ��
'Other X 1 ET NI Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 911W No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes V No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

'Facility Number: 1 6 - (Date of Inspection: 16Icli (A
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes ly4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: (jAQ
Spillway?: 0
Designed Freeboard(in): J o"
Observed Freeboard(in): 41"
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? In Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes ` No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes IX No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes INo El NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement? �`
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes VI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): e(cUe, i7C1541.)re... •
13. Soil Type(s): T
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes IA No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [K No El NA El NE
acres determination? 77��
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes [A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes gNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20.Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes NE No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Applicatiory% r1 Weekly Freeboard LA Waste Analysis Soil Analysis 1:1-Waste-Tvensfefs [A Weather Code
]Rainfall �CteeltingV G vis - NIZ 120 Minute Inspections Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install .nd maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes [ANo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ( NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: 'lb - OT (Date of Inspection: �u 41 \I\
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes tKI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes 1No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes IN No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes It No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 1.56 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes 1S4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes IA No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes rg No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
ca, umoL4 -1-i AA at-WV '04Tot_ci-s7. VOtth 'f\145\i`IN. j /-
sea P.
Cct,L, brrAtz i At.. to -L c o*C t 0..r(9.pl 0 JCi3 6451 IS PY131V 91)k sr?. D6W, 01151,•.A.- (a0 .
-
r
tVaAAA-- G( cowv14`han RANA- Lfisecgi
/��• �P1ars -b cost dvi-? �° av `- �r
.03
4 a d I'Id- J w 5 ft. o-a f rethecl rd dun to dvi-v-k4ites E
Reviewer/Inspector Name: /. i a ' Phone: -17 6— a 76
Reviewer/Inspector Sign.ture: -411116,1 Date: JoI (1
Page 3 of 3 2/4/20 5