The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About760004_Inspection_20191014 -� s - , x *t � �rt�, �. " tea A t Type of Visit: %Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: (,Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: %lit'I 16% Arrival Time: \O ;\-0 Departure Time:I\ V..1 I County:a b� Region:NS Pe Owner Email: Farm Name: Ch tUacA rryt# A:'''''•, thIlu3tnatr.-,1�lS 3 •C Owner Name: CTveiAtucokFarIM.S U LC Phone: Mailing Address: a So 0 -e5 .`� �db�0I �' �'1'�j '1�(3 Physical Address: ''Y,)fit lj fwG CArel,e 1 d�a 1�/ei IN C I V Facility Contact: •Thnlj Moo r5J Title: Phone: O t0- 15-161c Onsite Representative: f Integrator: Certified Operator: V Certification Number: Back-up Operator: Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: 35 ��l Longitude: t 161° —11 t /c0 j lil t TX) S 'b NC * 105�) g fLC( t4A.I ( i243 ) fi YSi- oraVC A oiYM✓C' 0\11 0 0.4(-1( MPASIIMA Oi t l egk. ii� •Wean to Finish -- Layer Dai Cow -- Wean to Feeder �� Non-Layer Dai Calf ��n g(Feeder to Finish j� �(�j� -U Dai Heifer ' :U Farrow to Wean EMI. 1iigR D Cow Farrow to Feeder _tom, .• 11' Non-Dai .,•Farrow to Finish �� Beef Stocker •Gilts ,;El Non-La ers �� •Beef Feeder �� `° •Boars ''; Pullets r El Beef Brood Cow � , t; °, ��, f ;�e�Turke Poults -- �� '� 3 Other 1 Others Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes g No ❑ NA ❑ NE Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? El Yes ❑ No El NA El NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes El No ID NA 1:-.1 NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No El NA ❑ NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes $41.No ❑ NA ❑ NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes II—No ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued 'Facility Number: 1 b - Uf_i 'Date of Inspection: I01141 19 Waste Collection&Treatment 66 4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? 0 Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes J No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: a( ( 1)p(� \WPtCe01104 Spillway?: Designed Freeboard(in): 0�e% f ve T Observed Freeboard(in): Li �� 5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.) 6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR 7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes Y`J No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8.Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No 0 NA ❑ NE 0 Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc. ❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence� of Wind �Drift �/ r❑ Application Outside of Approved Area 12.Crop Type(s): fe3C,V t. ?Alli V ( ( "-\yeni ( e l eclat nun 13. Soil Type(s): f1�" 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes vi No ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes q No 0 NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes [X No ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes N! No ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes V No ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records&Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 1K1 No ❑ NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes,check ❑ Yes V!No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box. ❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design 0 Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes NI No ❑ NA ❑ NE Waste Application 141,Weekly Freeboard %I Waste Analysis tyj Soil Analysis n"'"' ^*�Tranof�- tgjWeather Code Rainfall IPtocking ��T A120 Minute Inspections NMonthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections Sludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to instaleand maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA 0 NE 23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No VI NA 0 NE Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued IFacility Number:'16 _ OLI Date of Inspection: lolly /to' 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes Zg] No ❑ NA D NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes 17A No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es)below. 0 Failure to complete annual sludge survey El Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 27.Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes ['04 No ❑ NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? p(,Q—,k wN T` 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 71 No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes `gl No El NA El NE 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes 7� No ❑ NA ❑ NE 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes rilk] No ❑ NA ❑ NE 2'1 Sol is Jut b -e-h44 of .. • ..l, - , ir O 4. C&U 1'JrrA-11 15v1 ol'Ut bt.� Qr.cJ a P Dip l°1 . osr I '1 I !',! ' -"' ► 110 �► 1. Ism C vrdLt d-1 m n s/ (`0`1 br` (%((i l'8 . C c cs cr1't re/As r ? +ak • `b 91. K50- v�R S' C -c,K- r€ is vsc4- • *Niter-- ,\01-AAA-t. yiketAk.si -Pt) , 4,..r,r,\.,4( od / � �t 'l '� I 0S � l a' 11 14 a-{IlSh l to(1 o.c3 G13 t.\a- 1 .16 I • 0.13 Reviewer/Inspector Name: [ Phone:S-716--q-10S Reviewer/Inspector Si ure: Date: l b(1 q/ I Page3of3 2/4/2015