010009_Inspection_20191021

Ell.
1 : ; '1'e. .`"9; "°?:....- ,s .,..4, ,p, `. .. zy c 's-e te... `t�..`:. ..ti ..a»„ .. , '� ..;'.:
Type of Visit: *Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: titl Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 1Ot - (IGII Arrival BIECI\ `C Departure Time:1 ‘,4 S y, County:A Av.,Region: 1�
Farm Name: b1`\daub Y(y�. Owner Email:
J \ ,i,,,, (H) S36-3�b- WDy (() 5l6 6-13a-
Owner Name: 1 �t (,��/� l 1 dCl Pho�le: `
Mailing Address: VI LA Major Phil . I Sn6v. airnp. NIC 2'I -lq (�/v>,tlt�
Physical Address: 1�b6 �I*`OY 'di U\ t ,I rot N e 13e [_1 Facility Contact: \N`� � •r jt 1 t 1^da Title: Bone y % ai0 - 1
Onsite Representative: l\n1Al\ +biliCt6t9 Integrator:
Certified Operator: ),.A tX'OM (V\ 1 j) f 1 l 1 Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
'Ti.10 NC. y3i( ---- a Li ndt 12d • —� V erg' 1�r i LA 24‘ • )F (1'► '51^0
` R -Cu k.
Wean to Finish Layer 'Dairy Cow
Wean to Feeder Y rY Non-La er Dai Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean - � '°x ' Dry Cow
Farrow to Feeder _ - j E Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish �_'.• Beef Stocker
Gilts =•Non-La ers -- . Beef Feeder
Boars El Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
k Tur a Poults
(
'Other 1 - ° Other --
Discharees and Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes N No D NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

IFacility Number: 0 k - OR Date of Inspection: ,U`'2-\Vq
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes r14 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA El NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: wile,y IOW A' Ot- .
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): faiD" fruc.
•
9)4°
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes VI,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes *W No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? %Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ,aYes ❑ No El NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 14 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 9 No ❑ NA El NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [ 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. El Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Windown ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): COM 1aI 1 Srno►l,t ôrr
si 1 c&tc,
13.Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes y No ❑ NA ElNE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 4 No El NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable El Yes ❑ No 34 NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? El Yes VI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes 7'" No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage& Permit readily available? El Yes No ❑ NA El NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check El Yes it No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design El Maps El Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? eheci tl 'a a -b asiYes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application Weekly Freeboard Waste alysis of na lyt Weather Code
IS-Rainfall Derteckir[g L Crop Yie Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes X No El NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

'Facility Number: OX - bU\ 'Date of Inspection: `OI` . \q
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? 1� ❑ Yes 'J No ❑ NA El NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No 1p NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below. T
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey El Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes IA No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes 04 No ❑ NA El NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes cQ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? T'
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes KNo El NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the El Yes viNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
El Application Field El Lagoon/Storage Pond El Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes gj No El NA El NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? El Yes O No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? El YesINT"No El NA ❑ NE
R. . ,
tbA - ��iiimS p(a�s a�. uc-W rya <<
m �� 16'4
49, Ni\narvear S 7. l 11 Uhl ripe ,
poi l5 avL go9Atc tf-A ve OtAAA rnai Wct -
€10 (xo 1 olo)S r.e,�YOJ? ? NO °V i c,a, . two VC 9-ems t, € O LOt
CO,(( orc, -,O c t cd 12-bit , jvA (N 9-0
N t/ Q5A--C_ 0-tvek(At& kit) OBNCEir ovv{vcatigv
to. ve,k( t ,c. .d .-tb Work (12s�ssi ar P_
Reviewer/Inspector Name: paka1401LL/ Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Date: (Q
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015