Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout760011_Inspection_20191021 } ,, f , t II�.%. t;P ri" ' � '-Fe Ae�n.e`,�r c_v :��'�7 "fit ^' ei r '` s..,�""‘` `�.t, xr ' ii`i./.�')`�U �r�"�'i= Type of Visit: )Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance Reason for Visit: Routine Complaint Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access Date of Visit: Arrival Time:( 10 :IS-0. Departure Time: \k..•30+... I County: 6 Region:K.S Farm Name: Own er Email: Owner Name: 16Ye f'-k )►/ Phone: 5� bk°1 I Mailing Address: `2'1-11 tY 3A* r\)fttYj 0 . , gam s.VY 1\l� 2-131 6 � Physical Address: �/ Facility Contact: 2iYe V�I leSi--Jr Title: Phone:/ ' ?'-1— �11S Onsite Representative: I Integrator: �UYVIS Certified Operator: Certification Number: Back-up Operator: Certification Number: Location of Farm: Latitude: ' '- (j 1 '2(-)il Longitude: 'iq b SS 1 4111 US Hwy 14 ') ® NIL H1 4' n 7 CD0411A+- CArlyn VA. n > — ,: -i* �> ,` Wean to Finish Layer Dairy Cow Wean to Feeder Non Laver Dairy Calf Feeder to Finish tJ '��i Dairy Heifer Dry Cow Farrow to Wean Farrow to Feeder _' Non-Dairy Farrow to Finish : _ Beef Stocker Gilts .Non-La ers Beef Feeder Boars Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow 4 '. -`• : Turke Pouets Other •Other Discharges and Stream Impacts 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes V No ❑ NA ❑ NE Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)? d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes K No ❑ NA ❑ NE 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes [I No ❑ NA ❑ NE of the State other than from a discharge? Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued Facility Number: "I h - I \ (Date of Inspection:1 QI 2A\IC\ Waste Collection&Treatment 4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes igtNo ❑ NA ❑ NE a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6 Identifier: \copr �� (Y\c fl Spillway?: V Ll Designed Freeboard(in): I,1. • 1. u Observed Freeboard(in): y �' 6 5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE (i.e., large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.) 6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes isidNo ❑ NA ❑ NE waste management or closure plan? If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes NI No ❑ NA ❑ NE 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 23 No ❑ NA ❑ NE (not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require 73 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? Waste Application 10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes IANo ❑ NA ❑ NE maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground El Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.) ❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil ❑ Outside of Acceptable� Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area ( 12.Crop Type(s): c-6cue,1e, 1 y i e1 ! ,U Q, \a 13. Soil Type(s): 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes N No ❑ NA ❑ NE 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes 'f No ❑ NA ❑ NE 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes Y"K' No ❑ NA ❑ NE acres determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes it No ❑ NA ❑ NE 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes IA No ❑ NA ❑ NE Required Records& Documents 19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA El NE the appropriate box. ❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ['Other: 21. Does record keeping need improvement? , -.-.:._ ::: :: ' . : . ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE Waste Application Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis 1:1 Soil Analysis ficiWaste Transfers 154Weather Code 4Rainfall MStocking%Crop Yield 14120 Minute Inspections lj Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections DisjSludge Survey 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 0,No ❑ NA ❑ NE 23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes El No ANA El NE Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued 'Facility Number: -1. - `r 'Date of Inspection: VA a', `\ 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes A No ❑ NA ❑ NE 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes IA No ❑ NA ❑ NE the appropriate box(es)below. ❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes tIcl No ❑ NA ❑ NE 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes Dif No ❑ NA ❑ NE Other Issues 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? I✓uM1 29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes T No ❑ NA ❑ NE If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ixtNo ❑ NA ❑ NE ❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other: 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes N No ElNA ElNE 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes x No ❑ NA ❑ NE h 11 s o1v-e- bi x>"d o ( r (aolq)-Orm401 ✓t-cdt 11°11)01ci.4L,t mos,A U birth 45 .► ,104. b� .2x4 o ,e_ 0,01, ) . t r, Via- k krr. ekMer gsx,ucia(, 3urt/Z �,d, aP- ��°���- YQ ` • A �b em-alN ci lirCA,n,+ - b�A-Q. CA p C� • 0`C. CL� - wl U o r .c • '� 1( 'r - v.%S -boa - 6 fr,v,, ,, fly 60-elf. .vx. 120Ps. Na r c e--v\ P,r t. c • 0 In WCaI a F '‘%OA f\lt \AGS ‘p" V A r--s6 ',n °NI yr r l'S_ C.2, -"n ve wityc 1 I.0b � t u 0• A(7(3(i 3 4, �1h ogR1t' ` 4 �-'I 3 01 s.k t 3 Reviewer/Inspector Name: Phone: b Tit, "c{-10.! Reviewer/Inspector Sign Da3te31- -35-4 aafu at-i(; 10 t a-I ( 2t, k°1 Page 3 of 3 O� 2/4/2015 rtiOcGc-°` . C.,ar‘cAtex �J�` 1nC. �c..