010028_Inspection_20191021

r
�� -�E I f 1 '?�
Type of Visit: 1)Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: I k 0 1 ,IIICA Arrival Time:I ILI5b. Departure Time:( � I County• a Region:NSPO
Farm Name: Are. t- C LY' bn w( <<I Qv c( Owner Email:
Owner Name: A . D. V\ i `1 t 0.YCA Phone:
Mailing Address: t5(� rA ykd 19 Mt � ' VA • ) V11'A1 lcx t IV C a1 -S3
Physical Address: J
Facility Contact: ��l'�� L`� I QYd Title: Phone:'- b— kic— '5'
Onsite Representative: . /\ Integrator:
Certified Operator: V Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: r Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: J 6 62)14q" Longitude: ° % IAA`1
OV3i 11 7 V
U act Ieii AAiitt rid.> -010Yrvi ov% g
,_ :. _ ,_ _„_,,. .:,..:,.... ...J , ::: -..,:,.- :,a,,,,,,,,,,, .., ,:, .,.:‘,40,-,.-:,t-. -*-41-;s-,,,,'',;(4,;:',:lc.:.::7:'`.4f-ti.;T',-.1'1Ii-Y2:10 ,tP...,',.!„. .-',-..-20.,
44'
_ Wean to Finish Layer ��1 Dai Cow ��'������
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer -kW Dai Calf ;
Feeder to Finish
° Dai Heifer
Farrow to Wean 4� U
€ -�,.,, -�D Cow ��
Farrow to Feeder _j ' ;=: ,u,, '" - Non-Dai --
Farrow to Finish = _.Beef Stocker
Gilts -,I Non-La ers •Beef Feeder
Boars Pullets •Beef Brood Cow ��
, •Turke Poults -- 1 . i ''' .
Other Other -- -
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes gl No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes togj No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

'Facility Number: 0 l - ?-lc 'Date of Inspection: 10( .4 I kG1
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? El Yes it No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: N S
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
�
Observed Freeboard(in): 'sOu ��'%
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes IANo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes Lb! No ❑ NA 0 NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes IN No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [A No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
O Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): re5 cue fastwe,
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes tgl No 0 NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes 0,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes xj No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes KNo El NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?If yes,check ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
OWUP ['Checklists ❑Design 0 Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ['Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? ` Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application rg Weekly Freeboard Waste Analysis Soil Analysis [}Wsst 8.331.eatheL ud.
,Rainfall •Sto ing Z " •• - . EltitIMITITEringreetiimIL 1gMonthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections El-igittelgo-Suompic—
22. Did the fa ' '- . to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes tyl No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

'Facility Number:o` - 9 'Date of Inspection: to 1' 1 I ICI24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No tNA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes `r'No El NA El NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal? �j,,tnokfiit( T
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes KNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30.Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes IN No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes VI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes $ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes 51 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
## epya
a .. AIR .
5b1 is CDm IOW---ei i y, 9p l/ ? coNW-ed 91511 a•-1(7 n fit:1 .
(aL Cam p Lu-t d n 1;c,t4 �te • � rN
2v1�? UGC ,
• Ory S-adt board ( c0 rctt? YZV C•eot •
a -e 0.r U dS Toy- > o aeS -
1 v� 0 'P Grov Clta r� �d
k $o rticS�- ma
No wad clvuciA44015 sNnc.g., task cal( (gall -
t)0 cosJs Wilk 1 a:l,( Yu4i 1�- 1s•
Ncie,;(\o) kick, 'clek. to- . `Po* resc);,._d rv.A 4-- o x Parr s .
od cX tD (CeR.p c-r-i n Y-e e..e a s +1) $Ino,) V(1d L r -4\r-tom, l c .
Cc,..4,nv-� '2)61/411orn hx- \12A ,-4- INIACLI�nbvShho o s VLU
Reviewer/Inspector Name: UV( Phone:
Reviewer/Inspector Si re: Date:
Page 3 of 3 2 4/2015