010036_Inspection_20191028

x .:- , ::'::'-' r' F :':-o,i'n' - , 1,
v-'�� -ems. � ..,. ,',`. 4. ,-T.,.- ''_- ,,...'ne.,_ _ .. �, � �
Type of Visit: fikCompliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Q.Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:(1Q13$(�� Arrival Time:►�� �q Departure Time:1 ;� v I County: '1 Region: 1/02e.e)
Farm Name: 6 Q.rnOL11\ Qat Y Owner Email:
Owner Name: p,(1 Sohn try.,_ Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: fo��f?Iil danyN,Sne‘., Title: Phone:
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: V Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
a
Current' 1Current
_ P� -Pooh
��' Wean to Finish Layer P��Dai Cow �El[��
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dai Calf
Feeder to Finish `, �Dai Heifer
Farrow to Wean , .Curren •D Cow �� ,
Farrow to Feeder 1� `� Non-Dai _
Farrow to Finish Layers _ •Beef Stocker --
Gilts Non-Layers •Beef Feeder ��
- Boars Pullets f-Ill Beef Brood Cow
s Turkeys
' Turkey Poults
Other I Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts �[
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes I jA No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: TTT"`
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 123 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters jYes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: V[ - 3 E) Date of Inspectionko(t(I CI
Waste Collection&Treatment 111
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes I&No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: W S p t
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): bbtA -v+
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes 4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes INo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes 111 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes N-No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ANo LI NA 0 NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes UT No ❑ NA 0 NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. `f1 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
(1] Outside of Acceptable Crop 'Window El Evidence of Wind Drift El Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): COf11 cS1 kale i 1nActt ITerti( ct, ,e,
13.Soil Type(s): d
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes IX.No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes IN No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16.Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ® No El NA El NE
acres determination? ��``
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18.Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ['Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21.Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,the pro riate box below. IA Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis 0 Soil ^"ate rancifers Weather Code
Rainfall MStocking, Crop Yield Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑PAutige-6.w .
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 141 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No 04 NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

(Facility Number: C\ - (Date of Inspection: V)fal
10t
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ilkYes C4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No txtNA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes XI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes INo ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes IA No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes X No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond El Other:
32.Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes 1;4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes rA No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? %Yes
❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
N
@C" dVe 90 CA . +a�.r evt- hit AKA— bp . MUt (A ��-
Grtt.,er �rn�s ►a. enA094-4 c4-a /30a1 .
OL'aCt s d c fr Le. Fir r{c#Yds
‘c\o c4Acur e-rtb0rSV€ u e (S as 5a. s c.,rz 5 A-c-A -.
061/4y1-c p�,; t d '-6'1 dam- 0- V►cc�9--," to ati. &rry..16" W;ram Fsin, .
4kcjcxi
tApa
rotate- bury, i C¢,,,c .a.r. I/t%u&es hokn v4Cr.
'D { cso l (A)- SV wp V\ .. C)- \\1 4—. Cam-` � e b v n
UJ C Coin ca kr
.1 1101 VI 1`113tIT 4,,t3ola 4131t1
5.%6 licl, S qy t-*% 5.*AAA. 5.83 14
et43 sod. L 4nsk IA0col 8,q3 dal.
Reviewer/Inspector Name. /�� (-e r Phone:'
Reviewer/Inspector Si atu . -f Date: I 01.2s6/(01
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015