010006_Inspection_20191108

i1;
L E
e... td 2 - _ s 'b';. .... a �.s.,.�., 7`?`..: r ,'#F.. °`'r �" ,-Y�r �' r'',,.� uf.*. et.
Type of Visit: Compliance Inspection Operation Review Structure Evaluation Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: Routine Complaint Follow-up Referral Emergency Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:11 i I It 1q Arrival Time:l a': Departure Time:I 410` County: Region:
Farm Name: (Dvi -ti I v ► 1 l Ili -nn� Inc. Owner Email:
II
Owner Name: Y ' ii I l( a rx,... F. r L )1 (Sr.) Phone:
Mailing Address: ��� �l �C I flneJoan e '"C d•-�j0D
Physical Address: v
AA
Facility Contact: (�/)(�1�t LQ�?/ Title: Phone:S% Su i q
Onsite Representative: Integrator:
Certified Operator: Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
6' 1 1k rp ( CI ' (1
Location of Farm: Latitude: . C� Longitude: /_1
i_101g) ---') litt 1 CiC) --) 1:)k f i.),"--. Gill ©
a�-
Wean to Finish Layer ��Dai Cow �i�i.�1���
Wean to Feeder Non La er Dai Calf
Feeder to Finish 4`� a , I.Dai Heifer --
Farrow to Weang D Cow
Farrow to Feeder Non-Dai a
Farrow to Finish Layers Beef Stocker ��
Gilts Non-Layers Beef Feeder --
Boars _ Pullets Beef Brood Cow
Turkeys ,
Turkey Poults "�;
)Other _ Other, 1,1 ,�
R } A
i ,: .> - i .. =_r .. ,3-s .. i a�`,.' �. ��
Discharges and Stream Impacts II
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ElStructure ElApplication Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

(Facility Number: V 1 - O(, (Date of Inspection: t` 15 I
19
Waste Collection&Treatment tttt
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: S
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): ?'
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes ER No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes 141 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7.Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? V Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes ly2 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes 4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 94 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ElApplication Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): C o K 0 IT Q� ) Corr) (� rc-t' ✓,
13. Soil Type(s): v
14.Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes r_ t(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15.Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes allo ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No tANA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 77( NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ElYes [x No ElNA ❑l NE
Required Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes INo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes,check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box.
DWUP ['Checklists El Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements DOther:
21. Does record keepin_ '--:.....u. . •- es,c : . .- ap.ropriate Vbox below. Yes ❑ No El NA El NE
Waste Application . ❑Weekly Freeboar. ❑Waste AnalysTransfers Weather Code
Rainfall ►! Locking 0Crop Yield C �•' - -:: - '•. Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑5liidgp C„
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes VI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No [ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

'Facility Number: 0 1 - 0 A I (Date of Inspection: kl IIII,CA I
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes J No ANA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
El Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes E No ❑ NA ❑ NE
414 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes EA No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge, freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes 14 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond El Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes V No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes
No ❑ NA ❑ NE
�( p
t 03 a4-e, rLiye i cast,zsh S i n sr' r ao 1 c\ ivti s961 ctiAitt &is, No coNicefn foy
ea0 9-rid rcut-try, recOyds.vl ck. e tnc.i..; 1 . 1 ov� �vc01.1�•
* -Ss= n oleo5 Pre e-d�-Lrd ' nc ow
e, Cs 5.o lot. S,Q,Vmi UeaY6S
TraC free wavot
Ye, tans
3A'z i\5 � 21901°° .bk1L i0?' - � e OUt e �r ll
0
vr�
crd (and no ( vrda r &G rvk t- '-fi iccfr O� se I d .
„.2e, ti, e i�ti u as --e- ()Joe Y e GtosOre, p'tc&n •
bmitlat, jut, 9,1.) -0 -
Co SCel d Auo- 964�,
t 0 / Uric mail r --ti3 all S r-f2-- .
6‘hu fac 904
4bca-3 S+-3 ,+-10 1`S 3 .o '� Ip U Cow ���
Reviewer/Inspector Name: i, _ ,�!. .i_ A a _► Phone: _
A.
Reviewer/Inspector Si_ at .� ���� Date:
Page 3 of 3 2//2015