990008_Inspection_20191210

ray s.- 't ,., C'- � I §�td �"� �. z = s�;:
n.
x-.., ,-w <i. ,-,,vv . - `3" n ,;s .3,.v £3 *fir L a'P t .�`
Type of Visit: 10 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: tI Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit:ICI Arrival Time: !1.06 Cj Departure Time:I t l 10 q County: Region: W c 2 t
2si 1CN
Farm Name: Y,�p LLCG Owner Email:
Owner Name: Ay A 4.00 ma,yx Phone:
Mailing Address: 7)1)4 Wis . ` zo-{cvl ( tQ. NieJ ''L -c
•
Physical Address: s'h 19-,Y tV\ Jmn let .) 3 t6yi vt l lt, NC' a1055
Facility Contact: " ,4 ILFjp eM,a r) Title: Phone: — O '�C
Onsite Representative: I Integrator:
Certified Operator: \/ Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number: 2
Location of Farm: Latitude: 6 , 04 1 1 Longitude: V o °
CJ�c 64 tf
{'f'W ti 60 C =7 e c-5 h 6 ax"c1.6v‘ 'Qd• ---j qAfiY• t'), »n. 6vx 10.
i' „� 4 3E ;" rn €f >
2 .. ¢ t f
;'t*Oliiill4
....�� .�. �._ ,1,,'
« _. , -r ate, . mz� ,�, .». �#�,._,.. -e._ �.5.,.� ., ,. a � k'� e � f' ate` �'� ���. � _
Wean to Finish Layer ,jam,Dai Cow ��"�[� ,_.
Wean to Feeder ,, Non Layer II Dai Calf
Feeder to Finish Dai Heifer -- ;
Farrow to Wean D Cow �� .,
Farrow to Feeder .; t = i Non-Dai
Farrow to Finish • . • , Ill Beef Stocker
Gilts = 1111Non-La ers Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets -- ,•Beef Brood Cow --
„ t
•Turke Poults
Other ��
I .Other �3
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes 14 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes $ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes 'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: C1q - ON` `Date of Inspection: q I a-i(19
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall)less than adequate? ❑ Yes XNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: ear Ior vas P a,
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in):
�1
5.Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes (�( No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.) 7�
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ANo ElNA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes Wo ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes 'R(No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks) 7�
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes (,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes IV No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding El Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus El Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12.Crop Type(s): -541 tIea
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes o ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes 14 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination? 7�
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records& Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage& Permit readily available? ❑ Yes %INo ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes,check ❑ Yes �'+No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. TT``
❑WUP ['Checklists El Design ❑Maps El Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA El NE
l Waste Application `t •ekl Freeboard it Waste Analysis 14tSoil Analysis rs Weather Code
Rainfall a'Stockin:4 rop ield a nspections [Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
22. Did the facility fail to insta and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ® No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No `y] NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

'Facility Number:GIq - � 'Date of Inspection: q(2-1 I to,
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes VLNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No ' NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes Vr No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes in No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes 51 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes [N No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes No 0 NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes it No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a s s<r , x 2g
�` om ..,. .
t t S ave, 4 ln,"s lacer Cya 1ci) . VOWL We U3( adv•ILS
eckL b ay\ CkPt n Q)C+ r•PDX)
,r-
��t
�p to-6
o- US receYdt d ? COX b �{- U� 0
a*4-clUta iiaS-\ e S ova CU14 G-Ye 1PGc- V - C -k5k9rea0(
6 /1 1OICkUd ,r+
Reviewer/Inspector Name: : f Phone: 1 "
Reviewer/Inspector Si: W / Date:
Page3of3 2/4/2015 1tr io kC\