970018_Inspection_20191230

pDivision of Water Resources
Facility Number I - 1? 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: ?Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: aRoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access y� ,,
Date of Visit:L �r�?4 4C� 1 Arrival Time: A ;�0,, Departure Time: 'a(bbn County: j/a\_S Region: VW-41
Farm Name: b..Q V+ HThJyS FaYY1A. Owner Email:
Owner Name: Y T Ii.S Phone:
Mailing Address: 1161 AAA 4 h l A. poky, a. cik• 51 lc,i h Ne- �62d
!�
Physical Address: A/
Facility Contact: AAA dal O ZI-ies Title: Phone: t C1471—i7gc
Onsite Representative:
�\ Integrator:
Certified Operator: ,�/ Certification Number:
Back-up Operator: Certification Number:
Location of Farm: Latitude: Longitude:
NC 61 lA 7 Ili N 7 UC 2'%N —7 CID !V1#n. qv k led• 7 ( O1J fflr y 21 Y eitn3
d k ok •�7 Dwurrp,ir_zi . --2.10strocALia,--.cAA. . — .Aki ft%r t1d er et,
Design Current Design Current Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop. Cattle Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish Layer (c‘Dairy Cow 1976 t a
Wean to Feeder Non-Layer Dairy Calf
Feeder to Finish Dairy Heifer
Farrow to Wean Design Current Dry Cow 9)1)
Farrow to Feeder D Poult Ca 1 aci Po'. Non-Dairy
Farrow to Finish WEEMEM-- Beef Stocker
Gilts III Non-La ers -- Beef Feeder
Boars •Pullets -- Beef Brood Cow
IIMEMEMEI
Other •Turke Poults
Other I Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes A No ElNA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ElStructure ❑ Application Field ElOther:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State?(If yes, notify DWR) ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State(gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system?(If yes,notify DWR) E Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes X No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes CR No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

Facility Number: _11 - l U Date of Inspection: ta-f�n ICI
Waste Collection&Treatment
4. Is storage capacity(structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? tg Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ql No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: s
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard(in):
Observed Freeboard(in): ��1` j
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes1 -‘4.No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees,severe erosion,seepage,etc.)
6.Are there structures on-site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes,and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat,notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes IN No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits,dry stacks,and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes No ❑ NA El NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10.Are there any required buffers,setbacks,or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes tg No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes IANo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals(Cu,Zn,etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN> 10%or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable
Crop Window ❑�Evidence of Wind Drift El Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): P?SJJ! 1/o wlidhtuy (' rfl
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes %;1No ❑ NA ❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records&Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage&Permit readily available? ❑ Yes 14 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes,check ❑ Yes (X No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box. TT''
❑WUP El Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements El Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes,check the appropriate box bel 181 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Waste Application El Weekly Freeboard El Waste Analysis ❑Soil Analy ' ❑Woote T-o:..R :s--❑Weather Code
Rainfall Sty' g V. Crop Yield 1ectipns [X)Mont . • ' Rainfall Inspections Iftlitirtgr-Stwvey
22.Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes Tx No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected,did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No "•NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 2/4/2015 Continued

IFacility Number: CO - 14'1 (Date of Inspection: Ia'I2(I Ci
24.Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25.Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes,check ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es)below.
❑Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑Non-compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s)and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26.Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 01 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments(PLAT)certification? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28.Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes 14 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29.At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes,contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
permit?(i.e.,discharge,freeboard problems,over-application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?If yes,check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes IA No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond El Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP? ❑ Yes XI No ❑ NA ❑ NE
33.Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on-site representative? ❑ Yes 'IS No ❑ NA ❑ NE
34.Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency? 1 Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments(refer to question t):Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments,
,4104OWlogs or foOfiliY itbotter 0114oloOltnatiOutt{use additional pages as necessary).
-c-r a A-be be e,ov t r} by c (- i nspecA>s-r..
s\G, e, bGs.� Dp'PQ d� pr e v ' 6vtA
VJS(� O -t-odo-1-3
as Ylc n s --e a"
► . vcoPe (tor bri) 19:14 ,.vi h vol ot--bmvrtr urnk.1 reAc1.i .
,No zdotks ct
��vt� ti2etwAs ceded t vwgiLKt'-( .6 bockta Y'eca--a.ed .
94. Caiuib y G 'MCA- e1'-A-e 7 C.I `i-c((-- I YdS ' n ee 5''`
1. rp rds i t-1 -<b be co.i.)3\t-k ut
b V\ Ms.
\ht e vem.f6k ;r 410,3 w c,Sh w &.1-e.r 1 V•.)S.F.
spQp V(13C- CoQu) Oc Cf`'ole ` 6l..)co.
Reviewer/Inspector Na • A Nv Phone'"o 1.15--Ci1 O�
Reviewer/Inspector Signature: 4 Date: 1'_( 3ô I \A
Page 3 of 3 2/4/2015