440013_Inspection_20191219

Division of Water Resources
Facility Number I� - 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
Type of Visit: 40 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: Q t Departure Time:L ounty: a L.SaaC(Region: A`(�)
Farm Name: / !4 /Kp ; /H'7Lc7 F>?JG(Owner Email:
Owner Name: �j ��()7�v /Vt p 5g-) Phone:
Mailing Address: �a t��Ci I�
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative:
c
U Title:
Certified Operator: c� e M kv�s
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Design Current
Swine Capacity Pop.
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Latitude:
Zvi �%c NV- CV-0
�8'7 5 �
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number: 0049 9:
Certification Number:
Design Current
Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Non -La er
POahS
Design Current
Discharees and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Longitude:
Design , Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
!7
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow•
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
5Q Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
&YfPa+
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
[]Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
EKYes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page I of 3 21412015 Continued

Facilit Number: LM Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate?
❑ Yes
*5g.No
❑ NA
❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4
Structure 5
Structure
6
Identifier:
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health
or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
[:]Yes
gjNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit?
❑ Yes
KNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑ Yes
5< No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ Yes
g[No
❑ NA
❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
VNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals
(Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window� ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved
Area
I
12. Crop Type(s): crz / IFlt�l r 1137Z1r� I !JCryI Z
/ } nJ�1u C__
e-,<C1
13. Soil Type(s): F_ h u5 bix-0
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? i
❑Yes
QNo
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
R No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
[ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
ENo
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑ Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes PLNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes 5ZrNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes VNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
A
Page 2 of 3 . 21412015 Continuer!

Facility Number: W ,3.
Date of Inspection: -1/
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes '�j No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes 6 ,No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29, At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
§0 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
% No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[� No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes �;No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes 0 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes g No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
® No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
No
❑ NA
❑ NE
(Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
k).AST2'
G%yJ&- itJ �fUl�
�,'I.�' dav, iF' gab
)cC0-A')- i kAA-Q- I It tI mb v-
e�u6dfil
(fie-Vr�hP.u�" �`71i'�►3 i5 d�un:t��� .
��.� Gt6.orlie� '1l`�dcl
w� a S:0A A-A-,aCl�s';3
CX 4oa v e, 1% tit"
x 'rbw)J �
feaw`field t PSI �{ -
,t. )Akq a" Ne44.) _ "d�S crp— calms_"_ P94 A T3 4
Reviewer/Inspector Name: it
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
Phone: �2�" ? -*— `x/
Date: /
21412015

Division of Water Resou
Facility Number [qj] - r , T-] O Division of Soil and Water Conservation
O Other Agency
Type of Visit: 40 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review O Structure Evaluation O Technical Assistance
Reason for Visit: O Routine O Complaint O Follow-up O Referral O Emergency O Other O Denied Access
Date of Visit: (��Q� ► ji Arrival Time: FIZ7t,CD"e�pa/rttur�e�Time: '6V' � County: V7u*y t.V v�Region: Aac
Farm Name: /��C_J; Owner Email: �—
Owner Name: Sleaejo. i1, S Phone: ( 1 �6
Mailing Address: (�I IcJ0h 4)tgUp� J t✓O �,�_��(1kU1 �1� iQ
Physical Address:
1i9) A 1 N-.1 D kd (1 )Cua A n C 11l ((e Iki "7 %-70 -
Facility Contact: -%t \moss Title:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: gfeykffA M Pe-O S
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Latitude:
Phone: 192_t- / ([-
Integrator:
Certification Number: I J
Certification Number:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
La er
Non -La er
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Gilts
Boars
Other
Other
Design Current
Discharges and Stream Impacts
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DW R)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
O
a
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes �o ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
Eal o
❑ NA
FINE
❑ Yes
�o
❑ NA
❑ NE
Page I of 21412015 Continuer!

Facility Number: jDate of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? [—]Yes [ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
' CStructure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: W D P-�
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes [,.Ko ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes E2'<7 ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes Eq,? o ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes LJ'eo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks) /
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes 2'No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10, Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Pending ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window (❑Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Applic�ati"on Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):vGLtQ, j %FS1Zl Ve ,\i�,u7Jt1I%e
13. Soil Type(s): N I; �MM O PpVU' 4om lm qL4
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
❑ Yes
I_ -<
❑ NA
❑ NE
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑ Yes
Q4
❑ NA
❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
❑ Yes
❑'K*o�
❑ NA
❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑ Yes
[:14No
❑ NA
❑ NE
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes
IdJ,?qO
❑ NA
❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
o
❑ NA
❑ NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
Ltd r °o
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑WUP ❑Checklists ❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes FqZo ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ Weather Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑Yes ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: - � Date of inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes E? o ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes 19V ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification?
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
Q-<o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
Now
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[ 410
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[ <o—
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
24o
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
190
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
0'?<_
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
L" f1VO
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
[ Io
❑ NA
❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any othercomments. I
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
�Jast� ��l�S� •.
3 1z i �S D 0 y. 53
Il` Iv �1. 5i3
JOl�0/lg JSD y.`71
() M %Int up d� i N 2-010t.
L' uncp -e_�uSLV e IVt,$,v-e�
4i L,0_ �4t;f— P IA-av
V /
las'r Y2 of
G�>✓rl t `t s Irl,1w,4-
C 1 C1 Q � _& /r�-1 up s lard m4 p, ,�
Jvt Nam✓ lcJGi�.
11 7 -1 l
�irP S il� t� fO- ttiw�t po Nkr- APPI e
�-¢tS'ttx� ta.� d�Sl�►� �d '�PP'�i� >3Ns�.1�'N% ,�1
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signatur
Page 3 of 3
Phone: i?Z b —y*—Auq
Date: z d z L
21412015