20020903 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20020610

Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
June 14, 2002
Craven County
DWQ Project # 02-0903
APPROVAL of 401 Water Quality Certification and Neuse River Buffer Rules
Weyerhaeuser Company
North Carolina Timberlands
Attn: Brvan 11oika
Post Office Box 1391
New Bern, NC 28563
Dear Mr. Holka:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to impact 90 feet of waters for the purpose of a road
crossing as you described in your application dated June 10, 2002. After reviewing your application we have decided, this
fill is covered by General Water Quality Certification Number 3375. This Certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit
Number 14 when the Corps of Engineers issues it. This approval is also valid for the Neuse River buffer rules (15A NCAC
2B .0233). In addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project
including (but not limited to) Sediment and Erosion Control, Coastal Stormwater, Non-Discharge and Water Supply
Watershed regulations. Also this approval will expire when the accompanying 404 or CAMA permit expires unless
otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change Vour
project, you must notify us and send us a new application. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of tl is
Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. This approval shall expire
when the corresponding Nationwide Permit expires or as otherwise provided in the General Certification. If total wetland
fills for this project now or in the future) exceed one acre, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A
NCAC 2H .0506 (h). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed in the attached certification.
Upon completion of the project, the applicant shall complete and return the enclosed "Certification of Completion
Form" to notify DWQ that all the work included in the 401 Certification has been completed. The responsible
party shall complete the attached form and return it to the 401/Wetlands Unit of the Division of Water Quality.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this certification, you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act
within 60 days of the date that you receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to
Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative Hearings, P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh,
N.C. 27611-7447. This certification and its conditions are final and binding unless you ask for a hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. If you
have any questions, please telephone John Dorney at 919-733-1786 or Deborah Sawyer at our Washington Regional Office at
252-946-6481.
Attachment
cc: Corps of Engineers Washington Field Office
Washington DWQ Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Since ly,
,n imek, -P.E., Directo
s=a
:J7?DEt?,-?-
N. C. Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
[phone] (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), (http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands
Office Use Only: Form Version October 2001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. `
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
I. Processing

Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
? Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
0[401 Water Quality Certification
Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
II.

2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: &e h e y d ,
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: e a e V SCh C.o 0? d h
Mailing Address: Tn% b t
Attk% (v F- a r.. tr J Vlcq
Telephone Number: -' M(o 6 Fax Number: a S - b 3 3 y
E-mail Address: ?yah. hvlkc, We?E???eysew,cotA
2. Agent Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
Fax Number:
Page 5 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than I 1 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: S'oGU ox C1-ee,K
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only):
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN):
4. Location
County: C 1r a Vp K Nearest Town:RQ V e-1 c-->C.V,
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): /U k
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmark, etc.):
]Ae ?o to RovtfocK „ Tvv tx fQigkto N S P's-6 . O G
Aia{l ,i Cnr?.not%u koaJ
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): ld
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach 'a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application:
7. Property size (acres): s cQ W?e t,
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): e VS e P 1 Ve o c Vo, C week
9. River Basin: / t/ e-US 'e
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/maps/.)
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: T Q F o J, o e- s f e a c ce S S
to ul¢?,et-h?eyS w ah?
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: 8 a c,V k,3,9
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project:
F01-e 61-4 QVLJ a.4i- IcTyI tvi-
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. . , 'A.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification fore pc lusion of this work from the current application:
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 12
1. Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet
Type of Wetland***
(0(veNt" 4. 1 KO h at-ears fo- I-a6e

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, till,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property:
Total area of wetland impact proposed:
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
linear feet
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
lease Recify)
( Vets vt (4ee R t

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditch ing/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
** Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows, USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.usgs.gov. Several intemet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.tol2ozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 70 ff
Page 8 of 12
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate o ma
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
acres Name Waterbody
(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.

List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: till, excavation, areagmg,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., am/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.):- AIAT
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
techniques to be followed,,/duri/ng construction to,?r?Ieducenimpacts. A P
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 9 of 12
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed. A&
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used to satisfy mitigation requirements. Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet):
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet):
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres):
Page 10 of 12
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ? No
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ?
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ?
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 213 .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requi'rements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ? No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* Impact
(square feet Multiplier Required
Miti ation
1 3
2 1.5
Total
T c.unc i extends out su reet perpenalcular rrom near uanK or channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page I I of 12
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
XI. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
XII. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No ?
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No ?
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).

Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
? 70 Live Oak BayCarrawa y T / Arapahoe
Neuse River Kennel 'Beach?
r 11e Mar h Point
oFisher Landing Point 306) s?°3oti C
iver?
?Fianner Beach
Cro tan rlgsott Be
VWilkinso
70? ?.:
Pine Cliff Recreation
\ e Grove
306
70
erry Point Mcas/ nningham Field
Long Lake \ G{
101
306
4`0fi a dCk
Great Lake Little Lake
ti
G{°t Ellis Lake
?0
A'
t
Ho ly , prin Uni ??oin
L
ewf?ort Rt 1
r 70 ewport
1V W
Po
? r
t diver
- Wililwo The
})98 D Lorrne. Street Has USA / \ -1 I I II I I tti 7 +.
n Continue on Page 77 -
v / i" \? ' r ( 'ice, re,. 'i. ??:?J - \_•/ _ JONES
p7 I', naao \\ \ 3 d l : r ?' ''' CRAVEN CO -`
rri
---
}.
.? M'4+r ?k cnr>u'D 1? w 1 A rr, ?? l N, A . A - -" D
F= m
?? , o• ` \ n , 1 j 1 .'' 1 X1.1 1 ! / .?r1lO• 1 1 ..,.•-;? Y'?' rn
__ - \ J 11 1. !' 1 1'r mI / X01 > 1 rm /
of O , r 1-? !n ? (D + ,/ 1 1 ?I 1 \ 1 a r l C)
a_
`+.?r, D r: m
??_ r ?-1 ,1 r Ir,l ror ?I r 1- 1 l + r,} '1 J i /+ )
D r/ i r
Z » t lr.I t.'}1> -,1? lit i 11 I• a -c (7 j i dS
I J }, 1.! /,1? If=>.t/ i t1 }I i!• /? _ b`?ti°': -?? , ??.aug 6u 3
3 I \'.(?.1.. ,1.11, (?Znn'- 1 t ! 1 ' ( I17 t -ar . .ter ? ._.1 Cgn r ar?ssm mlx 31 /. d? ,
- /? I ''1 tVrj./,'h1I„}, i, Ir,h ,?,' i r• ? _ , , ,e In
E 1 ,0+ r rfAr 1 1 1 ' 1 }' : rl , I • ' , ` IaJS r ?^ °. '
? r CO w rr r, 1. erlr!} , '1 'r I 'ir'
i i D -/ - H ' / / - .I I t {: H to \I Z
r I t r •.? t1/.1 ,4 a ' / ra T?-1"?'/• a ?1/? ++ T° vQ r
R}
?° nrrurw ? ?/r1 i ` 't \ ^?? }/., 1.? .tL-.? 1 p 1`!I? \ ,I Q: C? ?'p r? ?"• `?/ `S? j
Fg34 `" ;` /iC }r - 0 1 rt.}1 r1i?f'?I 1! ?'OIe ? ? ? ?}i/?I r?`x /??? / ,?•
V7 !:.t• / 1 ! / r'? r 1'??pr, : 6u°,d v.? ,m1)F C' \ / {
fff
\_ '?1I'D.'Yi 1 , Q \'\ ` 1 1 ~ R. ' •I s Q I, - C-,i 5/ ? A 4 ,? !7 ?? ?.T _
--- -__? IB 1 \
r \ % I''
-r
E=j
..z .. ?g ?. ! '?+• ?l< ? ` b.?_'++n I / ^? ,ro ? 3 I ??c. ya.a gas .'.
,ramie
rt n
I l? w• i 3 3 ?-Z' _ 1 - f
---------------- ------------ 4=_?_ ?__
N
Y

1
1 '.
m
1 "
1
1
I
(
1
1
yl
---- -----------
--------------------------
ck m a f
C, ra v el /%-/ 3 9

\ ' I
/• ? L
4

Y
,?;1 cI
o'
38
del a

Q ?
v /
MAF' : - -
DISTRICT: I`EUSE
C10,M ': CQAV. 36
P,CF:EC:

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT
CLIENT WEYERHAEUSER TYPE INSPECTION
COUNTY CRAVEN BRIDGE NO. 0038
ROUTE SLOCUM CREEK ROAD ACROSS SLOCUM CREEK
LOCATION 0.25 MI. (N) FROM SSR 1756
SUPERSTRUCTURE TIMBER DECK ON SINGLE SPAN TIMBER GIRDERS
SUBSTRUCTURE ABUTMENTS: TIMBER CAP ON TIMBER PILES
SPANS 1 SPAN 16'- 0" BEARING TO BEARING LENGTH 13'- 0"
ROUTINE
INSP. CYCLE:
M. P. NA
PRESENT CONDITION FAIR INVENTORY RATING HS 17.1 / CHIPPER 75.2

INSPECTION DATE 5/17/01 OPERATING RATING HS 22.9 / CHIPPER 100.3
PRESENT POSTING NONE PROPOSED POSTING
COMPUTER UPDATE NA ANALYSIS DATE 5/21/01
POSTING LETTER DATE NONE OTHER SIGNS PRESENT NONE
SPECIAL PERMIT NONE
SIGN NOTICE NUMBER
ISSUED FOR REQUIRED
WEIGHT LIMIT
SPECIAL PERMIT
DELINEATORS
NARROW BRIDGE
ONE LANE BRIDGE
LOW CLEARANCE
_.??nururrr?,_
SEAL = ?-
s 22072 C
• O
\? Q. •
G 114 go go
BRIDGE INSPECTION RECORD AND SUMMARY
INSPECTION TYPE Routine INSPECTION DATE 5/17/01
BRIDGE NO. 00038 COUNTY CRAVEN ROUTE SLOCUM CR OVER SLOCUM CREEK RD
STRUCTURE TYPE TIMBER YEAR BUILT 0000
ROUTE ORIENTATION S To N FOR SPAN
EVALUATION CODE: 0 - 2 CRITICAL, 3 & 4 POOR, 5 & 6 FAIR, 7 - 9 GOOD
INSPECTION ITEMS
DECK ITEMS GRADE 45 CHANNEL a. WATERWAY
---
---- - -
1 WEARING SURFAC 4 & b. ALIGNMENT
2 DECK a. CONCRETE CHANNEL c. SCOUR
NO. OF EA. b. TIMBER
--...- 4
- PROT. d. SLOPE PROT., RIP-RAP, DIKES, ETC.
--
TYPE SPN. c. STEEL PLAN
GRADE d. OPEN GRID 50 APPROACH ROADWAY CONDITION
RATES 51 APPROACH SLABS

SI & A ITEM
52 PAINT SYSTEM CODE
' - ----- - -.
- -- - - ...... - - ------ - - -
58 ------ ------------ ------ ------ .-..-----...- ----------------- -- -- -- --- -
53 UTILITIES

3 RAILING a. CONCRETE
- - - -

-- -
54 RESPONSE TO LIVE LOAD
--..............
.. .
- - -------..

--
b. TIMBER -
55 ESTIMATED REMAINING LIFE (YEARS)
c. ALUMINUM
-
d. STEEL ..........
7
60 REGULATORY SIGN NOTICE ISSUED ---
4 CURBS - WHEELGUARDS - PARAPETS - MEDIAN 61 PROMPT -ACTION NOTICE ISSUED
5 WALKWAYS (ON OR ATTACHED TO STRUCTURE 62 PRESENTLY POSTED
6 DECK EXP a. STEEL PL. OR FINGER P 63 TOT. FIELD INSP. TIME (INCLUDE WRITE UP) (M/H)
------.
JTS OR b. MISC. PREFAB DEVICE 64 TOTAL SNOOPER INSP. TIME (HRS)
DEVICES c. COMPRESSION SEAL 65 TOTAL TRAFFIC CONTROL TIME (M/H)
NO. OF d. STANDARD JOINTS
EACH e. OPEN JOINTS 70 SI&A GENERAL CONDITION RATINGS
7 DECK DEBRIS (INCLUDE EXCESS SAND / GRAVE 4 a. DECK ITEM 58 4
b. SUPERSTRUCTURE ITEM 59 7
SUPERSTRUCTURE (FM. 1(90)b TRUSS) c. SUBSTRUCTURE ITEM 60 5

10 LONGITUDINAL BEAMS OR GIRDER
7 ------------ --..-..---.------------------ --------------- ------ ------------
d. CHANNEL & CHANNEL PROT ITEM 61
11 LONGITUDINAL JOIST OR STRINGER
12 INT. DIAP'S, X-FRAMES, BRACING, & CONN'S 71 SI&A FIELD APPRAISAL RATINGS
13 END DIAP'S, CURTAIN WALLS, & CONN'S a. WATERWAY ADAQUACY
-------.
14 FLOOR BEAMS AND CONNECTIONS b. APPR. RDWY. ALIGNMENT
_....._ --- .. _ _- _....... ..----
15 BEARINGS ASSEMBLIES (INCLUDE MISALIGN)
--- --- -- -- -- -- -

- - _.....

.. - ----- -_ _' -----.. .

----- -
--- -..
16 DRAINAGE SYSTEMS (ON STRUCTURES) 72 FIELD SCOUR EVALUATION
............... _. -
17 MOVABLE SPAN MACHINER -
USE OF INSP. ACCESSIBILITY EQUIPMENT
SUBSTRRUCTURE ITEMS, ITEM 60 (INCLUDES SCOUR) SNOOPER (CODE P, S, 4 or N )
.......- N
- --
35 TIM. a. ABUT. & INT. BENT CAPS & RISERS 7 LADDER YIN N
-
SUBSTR. b. PILES, POST, SILLS, & BRACING -
7
OVERSIDE LADDER YIN ------- -
N
--
c. BULKHEADS, WING'S, & TIE BACKS -----.
4
BUCKET TRUCK YIN
N

36 CONC. a. ABUT. & BENT CAPS
-
- -
BOAT YIN
_
-- --.--
N
- . -----
- -- -
-
SUBSTR. b. ABUT. & BENT COL'S & BREASTWALL --
- - .... ...
OTHER( ) YIN --
N
c. ABUT. & INT. BENT PILES
d. BACKWALLS - WING'S - RETAIN. WALL SPECIAL INSPECTION REQUESTED FOR:
e. ABUT. AND BENT FOOTINGS & SILLS
37 STEEL a. ABUT. & INT. BENT CAPS & RISERS NOTE:
SUBSTR. b. PILES AND BRACING AND BULKHEAD
.

38 FOUNDATION PILES, TYPE MATERIAL
7 -....... ...... . -_
....
39 SLOPE PROT., RIP - RAP (INCLUDE DRAINAGE)
40 FENDER SYSTEM 80 INSPECTED BY JOHN DILWORTH
41 DRIFT 81 REVIEWED BY: MICHAELCRAIG
Sheet ,? of :f
Bridge I & A Form 1 (82) H
Revised 6/4/97
Field Inspection Report

Bridge Inspection & Analysis Bridge No. 0038
Route SLOCUM CREEK RD
Count CRAVEN
TEAM LEADER: JOHN A. DILWORTH DATE: 5/16/01
ASSISTED BY: MICHAEL W. CRAIG
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION
1. WOOD RUNNER WEARING SURFACE RUNNERS SHOW 1 1/2" SECTION LOSS AND ARE NO
(4) GOOD LONGER CAPABLE OF DISTRIBUTING TRUCK LOADS TO
MULTIPLE DECKING BEAMS. (SEE PHOTO)
DECK BOARDS THE DECKING BOARDS SHOW SEVERE SECTION LOSS
2.b (4) POOR DUE TO ABRASION FROM TRAFFIC. FIRST DECKING
BOARD ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER APPEARS TO
HAVE FAILED DUE TO IMPACT LOADING.
ENDS OF MOST DECKING BOARDS ARE SPLIT AND
DECAYING.
RAIL RAIL IS POORLY ATTACHED TO POSTS LOCATED OFF
3.d (7) GOOD THE BRIDGE. THE RAIL IS NOT CAPABLE OF
REDIRECTING ONCOMING TRAFFIC.
35.a TIMBER ABUTMENTS SOIL BEHIND NORTH TIMBER LAGGING HAS ERODED.
(7) GOOD GEOFABRIC IS RETAINING THE NORTH ABUTMENT. A 1-
FOOT GAP BETWEEN THE LAGGING AND THE
GEOFABRIC WAS OBSERVED. (SEE PHOTO)
35.b TIMBER PILES 2 PILES LOCATED ON THE NORTH ABUTMENT ARE
(7) GOOD LOADED ON TIPS, AND HAVE BEGUN LOCAL CRUSHING.
35.c TIMBER WINGS NORTHEAST WING WALL HAS LOCALIZED TIMBER
(4) POOR FAILURES. (SEE PHOTO) THE CORNER POST FOR THE
WEST WING WALL HAS SEVERE ROT. (SEE PHOTO)
SOUTHEAST AND SOUTHWEST WING WALL COVERED
WITH SOD AND VEGETATION.
. s?
WETHERILL
ENGINEERING
3 o "31
BRIDGE INSPECTOR'S RECOMMENDATION FOR MAINTENANCE REPAIRS
BRIDGE 00012 COUNTY CRAVEN DIVISION
INSPECTED BY JOHN DILWORTH DATE 5/16/01
THESE REPAIRS SHOULD BE MADE WITHIN TWELVE MONTHS FROM DATE OF THIS INSPECTION
FUNCTION DESCRIPTION OF UNIT QUANTITY REMARK EST.
CODE FUNCTION COST
559 REPLACEMENT OF TIMBER SF REPLACE DECKING AND RUNNER
BRIDGE FLOORS BOARDS
580 MAINTENANCE OF TIMBER MHS REPLACE ROTTED AND MISSING
SUBSTRUCTURE LAGGING AND WINGWALL PILES
9 0 r -31
BRIDGE NO: 0038 COUNTY: CRAVEN INSPECTION DATE: 5116101
UPSTREAM VIEW, LOOKING WEST
ETHERILL
ENGINEERING
SHEET Y' OF 31
TYPICAL BARRIER RAIL, LOOKING SOUTH
BRIDGE NO: 0038 COUNTY: CRAVEN INSPECTION DATE: 5/16/01
GENERAL VIEW OF DECK
ETH ERILL
W
ENGINEERING
SHEET G OF 3
SEVERE SPLITS DUE TO ABRASION, CENTER OF DECK
4 BRIDGE NO: 0038 COUNTY: CRAVEN INSPECTION DATE: 5/16/01
.J-! ^ sol - - - a
t(.
J61 y..
NORTHWEST DECK BOARD SPLIT
r Gy ..
ETHERILL
ENGINEERING
SHEET OF 31
NORTHWEST WING WALL; MISSING LAGGING AND CORNER
BOARD ROT
BRIDGE NO: 0038 COUNTY: CRAVEN INSPECTION DATE: 5/16/01
LARGE GAP BEHIND NORTH ABUTMENT
ETHERILL
ENGINEERING
SHEET 9" OF 31
PILE 41 ON NORTH ABUTMENT LOADED ON TIP, PILE 42
SIMILAR
A 1, 10 BRIDGE NO: 0038 COUNTY: CRAVEN INSPECTION DATE: 5/16/01
NORTH ABUTMENT, TYPICAL
Y
ETHERILL
ENGINEERING
SHEET j OF 3L
NORTHEAST WING WALL; WATER STAINED AND TIMBER
FAILURE