Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0001121_PERMIT ISSUANCE_20021213NPDES DOCUMENT SCANNING COVER SHEET NPDES Permit: NC0001121 Document Type: Permit Issuance r£ Wasteload Allocation Authorization to Construct (AtC) Permit Modification Speculative Limits 201 Facilities Plan Instream Assessment (67B) Environmental Assessment (EA) Permit History Document Date: December 13, 2002 WhLIM dooumeat IM printed as rftWUN a paper - i,gaore aay cX00JMtejMt 4C*a the reYe %We Bide :1-3te of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director December 13, 2002 Mr. David Margin Veeder-Root of North Carolina, Inc. 2100 Nest Broad Street Elizabethtown, North. Carolina 28337 Subject. Issuance of NPDES Permit NC0001121 Veeder-Root of North Carolina Bladen County Dear Mr. Martin: Division personnel have reviewed and approved your application for issuance of the subject permit. Accordingly, we are forwarding the attached NPDES discharge permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency dated May 9, 1994 (or as subsequently amended.) The final permit authorizes your company to discharge treated wastewater from the Veeder-Root treatment facility to the Cape Fear River, a class C stream in the Cape Fear River Basin. The permit includes discharge limitations and/or monitoring for perchloroethylene,. total cadmium, total copper, total chromium, total zinc, total lead, total nickel, total silver, total cyanide and total residual chlorine. The following modifications have been made to the final permit. Mass limits for metals. Both the monthly average and daily maximum effluent limitations for the following parameters have been modified based on use of updated process flow to determine mass - based limits: total cadmium, total chromium, total copper, total lead, total nickel, total silver, total zinc, total cyanide, total toxic organics, total suspended solids and oil and grease. Sampling for metals. The sample type for total cadmium, total chromium, total copper, total lead, total nickel, total silver, and total zinc will be composite. The grab sample type was inadvertently placed in the draft permit for these parameters. If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of this letter. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714. Unless such a demand is made, this permit shall be final and binding. 1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 (919) 733.50831 FAX (919) 733-0719 An Equal Oppwrri njty Affirmative Adon. Fmpl-, er SM r0cyded I I M. post -consumer paper Issuance of Permit \C0001 I? l Page 2 This permit is not transferable without prior notice to the Division. This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be requited by the Division of Water Quality or permits required by the Division of Land Resources, Coastal Area Management Act, or any other Federal or Local governmental permits may be required. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Jacquelyn Nowell at (919) 733- 5083, extension 512. Sincerely, Original Signed By David A. Goodrich Alan W. Klimek, P.E. cc: Central dies Point Source Compliance & Enforcement (.fait Fayetteville Regional Office / Water Quality Section i�1PDE5 Lfnit/Permit Idle EPA Region IV / Roosevelt Childress Acluaric Toxicology [.fret of Permit NC0001 121 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY PERA11 I' TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, Veeder — Root Company, Inc. is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at the Veeder —Root Company 2100 West Broad Street north of Elizabethtown Bladen County to receiving waters designated as the Cape Fear River in the Cape rear River Basin in accordance with effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and. other conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III and IV hereof. This permit small become effective January 1, 2003. This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on October 31, 2006. Signed this day December 13, 2002. Original Signed By David AM Goodrich Alan W. Klimek, P. E ., Director _. Division of Water Quality By Authority of the Environmental i\Ianagement Commission Permit LNCo001 l-1 SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET Veeder — Root Company, Inc. is hereby authorized to: 1. Continue to operate an existing 0.17 MGD wastewater treatment facility consisting of chrome and cyanide batch treatment tanks, acid -alkaline holding tank, clarifier, and plate and frame press to discharge process wastewater via outfall 001. 2. Discharge approximately 0.152 MGD of once -through non -contact cooling water to which no chemical additives have been added via outfall 002. 3. Discharge 0.152 MGD of remediated groundwater from a packed -tower air stripper via outfall 003. 4. Discharge the combined discharges from outfalls 001, 002 and 003 via the combined wastewater outfaH 004. All of these outfalls are from the Veeder-Root facility located at 2100 West Broad Street north of Elizabethtown in Bladen County. 5. Discharge from the above -listed outfalls at the location specified on the attached map into the Cape Fear River, a class C stream in the Cape Fear River Basin. 1i 'Y Q I•Y ' 1 _ .ti i . hiduast ' L • � O • - Green _ i'� ♦ ,Y� C1t MI1 x f 51 wT Elizabeth wry` r� - . - - . ; •.� �jl. - Nil y a r Ci N �aT�Mo,«eo�oa,e,�► � r'17s"E v wives—im 78 Facility -information Latitude: 34"38'55" Sub -Basin: 03-06-16 Longitude: 7g637'30" uad #: i24i�t Stieam Class: C RucciyiLi Stfeam_ 'ape Fear Riven Facility`s ; Location, X pvt ` TP, e ee er Fot ompany 1 iii a l l i 14Ckfuu4 iii - Permit NC0001121 A. (4.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS (004) During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from the combined ourfall 004 (combined discharges from outfalls 001, 002, and 003). Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below: EFFLUENT CHARACTERISTICS LIMITS - MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Monthly Average Weekly. Avera de . Daily Maximum Measurement Fre uenc Sample T e Sample Location Total Suspended Solids 6.0pounds/day 11.71pounds/day Weekly composite Effluent Oil and Grease 5.1pounds/day 10.15pounds/day Weekly Grab Effluent Tem eraturel Daily Grab Effluent H 2 Weekly Grab Effluent Total Residual Chlorine Weekly Grab Effluent Total Cadmium 0.05pounds/day 0:13pounds/day Weekly Com ositef Effluent Total Chromium 0.33 2ounds/day 0.54pounds/day Weekly Composite Effluent Total Copper 0.40pounds/day 0.66 poundsiday Weekly Composite Effluent Total Cyanide 0.13pounds/day 0.23 oundslda Weekly Grab Effluent Total Lead 0.08pounds/day 0.13 poundstday Weekly Composite Effluent Total Nickel 0.46pounds/day 0.78 oundslda Weekly Composite Effluent Total Silver 0.05pounds/day 0.08pounds/day Weekly Composite Effluent Total Zinc 1 0.29pounds/day 0.51pounds/day Weekly om site Effluent Total Toxic Or anics3,4 0.42 poundsiday Monthly Grab Effluent Acute Toxicity, quarterly Composite Effluent Notes I. The temperature of the effluent shall not cause an increase in the temperature of the receiving stream of more than 2.8 °C and in no case cause the ambient water temperature to exceed 32.0'C. 2. The pH shall not be less that 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units, 3. In lieu of monitoring for Total Toxic Organics, the petmittee may submit the following certification statement: `Based on my inquiry of the person or persons directly responsible for managing compliance with the permit limitation for total toxic organic, 1 certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief, no dumping of concenrrated toxic organics into the wastewater has occurred since the filing of the last discharge monitoring report." 4. Total tonic organics is the summation of all quantifiable values greater than 0.01 milligrams per liter from the list of toxic organics in 40 CFR 433:11(e). 5. Acute Toxicity (Fathead Minnow 24-hour). No Significant Mortab y at 90% with testing in March, June, September and December (see A. (6)). There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts. A. (5.) BIOCIDE CONDITION There shall be no chromium, zinc or copper added to the treatment system except a* pre -approved additives to biocidal compounds. The permittee shall obtain approval from the Division's Aquatic Toxicology Unit prior to the use of any biocide (not previously approved by the Division) in the effluent discharged under this permit. Approval for use of any biocide not previously approved should be requested at least 90 days in advance of any planned usage. Contact the Aquatic Toxicology Unit for detailed instructions on requesting approval of biocides: Ni C DENR / D\X7Q / Aquatic Toxicology Unit 1621 ;`tail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621 Permit NCOOO1121 A. (6.) ACUTE TOXICITY PASS/FAIL PERMIT LIMIT (Quarterly) The permittee shall conduct acute toxicity tests on a quarterly basis using protocols defined in the North Carolina Procedure Document entitled "Pass/Fail Methodology For Determining Acute Toxicity In A Single Effluent Concentration" (Revised July, 1992 or subsequent versions). The monitoring shall be performed as a Fathead Minnow (Pimephales promelas) 24-hour static test. The effluent concentration at which there may be at no time significant acute mortality is 90% (defined as treatment two in the procedure document). Effluent samples for self monitoring purposes must be obtained during representative effluent discharge below all waste treatment. The tests will be performed during the months of March, June, September and December. All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (.MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the parameter code TGE6C. Additionally, D)'.VQ Form AT-2 (original) is to be sent to the following address: Attention: NC DENR DWQ / Environmental Sciences Branch 1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621 Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Branch no later than 34 days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made. Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting chemical/physical measurements performed in association with the toxicity, tests, as well as all dose/response data. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream. Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, the permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The report shall be submitted to the Environmental Sciences Branch at the address cited above. Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to meet specified Emits, then monthly monitoring will begin immediately until such time that a single testis passed. Upon passing, this monthly test requirement will revert to quarterly, in the months specified above. Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, then monthly monitoring will begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed. Upon passing, this monthly test requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified above. Should any test data from either these monitoring requirements or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of Water Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits. NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following the month of the initial monitoring. Pcrrnit NCO001 121 A. (L) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS (001) During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge process wastewater from outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below: EFFLUENT Limits MONITORING REQUIREMENTS CHARACTERISTIC S Monthly Weekly Daily Measurement Sample Sample Average Average Maximum Frequency Type Location' .Flow Continuous Recording Influent or Effluent Notes 1. Samples must be collected prior to mixing with any other waste streams. Fhere shall be no discharge of floating solids or risible foam in other than trace amounts. A. (2.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS (002) During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittce is authorized to discharge non -contact cooling water from outfall 002. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittce as specified below: EFFLUENT LIMITS MONITORING REQUIREMENTS CHARACTERISTIC S Monthly Average Weekly Average Daily Maximum Measurement Frequency Sample T• a Sample - Location' Flow Monthly Instantaneous Effluent Notes 1. Samples must be collected prior to mixing avith any other waste streams. 2. There shall be no chromium, zinc or copper added to the treatment system except as pre -approved additives to the biocidal compounds. 3. The Permittee shall obtain authorization from the Division prior to use of any biocidal additive in the cooling water (see A. (5)). There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts. A. (3.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS (003) During the period beginning on the effective date of the permit and lasting until expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge remediated groundwater from outfall 003. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below: EFFLUENT LIMITS MONITORING REQUIREMENTS CHARACTERISTICS Monthly Weekly Daily Measurement Sample Sample Average Average.. Maximum _Fre!quency Type Location' Flow 0.152 MG0 Continuous Recording Influent or Effluent Perchloroethylene (N ll) Quarterly Grab Effluent Notes 1. Samples must be collected prior to mixing with any other xvaste streams. �aZEtJ ST4TFS A UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY �� rw REGION 4 i e ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER 61 FORSYTH STREET yl'�f PRO��G` ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960 OCT 2 2 2002 Ms. Jackie Nowell North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality NPDES Unit 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh. NC 27699-1617 SUBJ: Draft NPDES Permit for weeder -Root Permit No. NC0001121 Dear Ms. Nowell: I OCT 2 4 2002 1 ©EMIR - WATER QUALITY POET SOURCE BRAIX11 In accordance with the EPAINCDENR MOA, we have completed review of the draft permit specified above and have no comments or objections to its conditions. We request that we be afforded an additional review opportunity only ifs significant changes are nnadc to the draft Permit prior tO issuance, or if significant comments regarding the draft perni.it arf received. Otherwise, please send us one copy of the final permit when issued. If you have any questions, please call me at (404) 562-9304. Sincerely, 1'1'1� 4— AA- Marshall Hyatt, Environmental Scientist Permits, Grants and Technical Assistance Branch Water Management Division Internet Address (URL) • http:gwww.epa.gov Recycled/Recyclable . Printed with Vegetable OR Based Inks an Recycled Paper (Minimum 30% Postconsumer) NCO001 121 - Veeder-Root Subject: NC0001121 - Veeder-Root Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 14:39:41 -0400 From: Hyatt.Marshal@epamail.epa.gov To: jackie.nowell@ncmail.net just one quick comment. For the metals, the permit requires grab samples. Typically, metals monitoring is via composite. Grabs are appropriate if the retention time in the treatment system is sufficiently long. Is there a specific reason that grabs are required here? I will send you a no comment letter today. thanks Marshall of 1 1 12/2/02 3:17 PM Re: NCOOO1 121 - Veeder-Root • e Subject: Re: NC0001121 - Veeder-Root Date: Tue. 22 Oct 2002 15:29:24 -0400 From: Jackie Nowell <jackie.nowell@nemail.net> Organization: NC DENR DWQ To: Hyatt.MarshalI@epamaiI.epa.gov epamaiI.epa.gov Hi Marshall, This was a cut and paste, typo error. The samples should be composite for all metals except cyanide, as it was in the previous permit.( North Carolina regulation 15A NCAC 2B .0505 (c)(3)(C)(viii) requires cyanide to be sampled as grab in influent and effluent tests.) The permittee called and questioned me about the sample type also, and wondered why it was no longer composite. it will be corrected back to composite for cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, nickel, silver and zinc in the final permit. Thank you. Hyatt.Marshall@epamail.epa.gov wrote: > just one quick comment. For the metals, the permit requires grab > samples. Typically, metals monitoring is via composite. Grabs are > appropriate if the retention time in the treatment system is > sufficiently long. is there a specific reason that grabs are required > here? > T will send you a no comment letter today. > > thanks > Marshall l of 1 12/2/02 3:18 PM Re: NC0001121 - Veeder-Root Subject: Re: NC0001121 - Veeder-Root Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:32:46 -0400 From: Hyatt.Marshall@epamall.epa.gov epamail.epa.gov To: Jackie Nowell <jackie.nowell@ncmail.net> thanks for the quick reply and for fixing this. 1 of 1 12/2/02 3:17 PM 19 Danaher Controls D E 2100 W. Broad Street Elizabethtown, NC 28337 NOV — 5 2002 Telephone 910.862.2511 Fax 910.862.5400 DENR-WATER OUALITY POINT SOURCE BRANCH October 31, 2002 Ms. Jacquelyn M. Nowell North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality NPDES Unit 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Reference: Review and Comments on Draft NPDES Permit Dear Ms. Nowell: Danaher Controls received and reviewed the draft NPDES Permit No. NCO001121 with your October 16, 2002, letter. The following comments are from our review of the draft permit. In the Supplement to Permit Cover Sheet, item 2 "Discharge through outfall 002 once through non contact cooling water to which no chemical additives have been added", does not list a flow. Currently our permit specifies a flow of 0.152 MGD. We believe this may be a "cut and paste" error. We agree with the flow specified for outfall 001 at 0.170 MGD and outfall 003 at 0.152 MGD. Danaher Controls believes that our production will continue to increase in 2003 correlating to waste stream flows from outfall 001 and outfall 002 approaching the permitted flows of 0.170 MGD and 0.152 MGD, respectively. The table A. (4.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS — FINAL under Monitoring Requirements — Sample Types list "grab" samples for total cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, nickel, silver, and zinc. We believe this maybe a "cut and paste" error and should be "composite" sampling. If this is not an error, Danaher Controls believes that composite sampling for the above seven total metals better represents the daily metal loads. If you have any questions or comments, please call Mr. David Martin at (910) 862-5410. Sincerely Ci David M. Martin Facilities Engineer pi� Worldwide Brands: Veeder-Root Dynapar Eagle Signal Veeder Root NPDES Permit Renewal Subject: Veeder Root NPDES Permit Renewal Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 1 S:1 5:29 -0400 .From: DMartin@dancon.com To: jackie.nowell@ncmail.net CC: btrexler@dunckleedunham.com Dear Ms Nowell: After reading your email and speaking to you on the telephone I researched the MR1's to get the data you wanted. The average flow /month and the maximum flow /month for outfall 001 is attached. I also calculated the average flow /month and the average maximum flow /month for -the years of 1999, 2000, and 2001. I would like to address some of the flow data that I have listed since it shows a decrease in the flow compared to the information you had from 1/11/96. In 1992 - 1993 we transferred a lot of our manufacturing to another location within our Corporation. The transfer reduced the amount of plating done at Elizabethtown. The plating production remained lower until 1999 - 2000. At that time we transferred another of our Corporation's companies into the Elizabethtown plant. The plating production level was increased but due to the economic down turn the increase isn't seen. Also we still have approximately 50,000 sq ft of empty spare in our facility that will be used to transfer additional manufacturing to Elizabethtown. Our company feels that our manufacturing will increase in the first or second quarter of 2003 and that we will transfer more manufacturing to the Elizabethtown plant in 2003. Therefore, I feel that our flow rates for our 001 outfall will return to the normal range (0.0263 MGD/month average & 0.0444 MGD daily Max.) by year's end 2003. Also we feel that the 002 outfall will return to the same level as it was in 1996 or sightly higher. The 002 outfall increase would be due to increase plastic molding due to a manufacturing transfer. Thanks and let me know if you have any questions or comments. (See attached file: NPDES Permit Renewal 0.01 Flow Data.xls) David M. Martin Danaher Controls 2100 W. Broad Street Elizabethtown, Nc 28337-8826 910.862.5410 (Direct) 910.862.2511 x3210 (Office) 910.862.5478 (Fax) Name: NPDES Permit Renewal 001 Flow Data.xls 'NPDES Permit Renewal 001 Flow Data.xls Type: Microsoft Excel Worksheet (application/vnd.ms-excel) Encoding: base64 I of 1 10/2/02 3:1 S PM NPDES Permit Renewal 001 Flow Data Initial Data Sep 7, 2002 Mo/yr Avg/MGD Max/MGD Jan-99 0.0173 0.0185 Feb-99 0.0181 0.0233 Mar-99 0.0167 0.0206 Apr-99 0.018 0.0338 May-99 0.0174 0.0336 Jun-99 0.0217 0.0382 Jul-99 0.0228, 0,0964 Aug-99 0,0204 0,0241 Sep-99 0,0204 0.0365 Oct-99 0.0193 0,0315 Nov-99 0.0208 0.0319 Dec-99 0.0195 0.0288 Avglyr 0.019367 0.034767 Jan-00 0.0233 0.0487 Feb-00 0.0191 0.0348 Mar-00 0,0213 0,0316 Apr 00 0.0255 0,0312 May-00 0.0243 0.0396 •Jun-00 0.0288 0.0403 Jul-00 0.0291 0.0394 Aug-00 0.0286 0.0437 Sep-00 0,0278 0,0447 Oct-00 0.028 0.0391 Nov-00 0.0293 0.0383 Dec-00 0.0275 0.0384 Avglyr 0.02605 0.03915 Jan-01 0.0277 0.033 Feb-01 0.0263 0.0326 Mar-01 0.0224 0.0342 Apr-01 0.022 0.0281 May-01 0,0182 0,0283 Jun-01 0.0186 0.0222 Jul-01 0.0211 0.032 Aug-01 0.0268 0.0435 Sep-01 0.0267 0.033 Oct-01 0.0283 0.0392 Nov-01 0.0323 0.0448 Dec-01 0,0275 0.0332 Avglyr 0.024825 0.033675 3yr Avg 0.023414 0.035864 Jan-02 0.0265 0.0471 Feb-02 0.0237 0,0309 Mar-02 0.0228 0.0299 Apr-02 0.0293 0.0442 May-02 0.0335 0.0463 Jun-02 0.0251 0.0345 Jul-02 0.0185 0.0319 Aug-02 Sep-02 Oct-02 Nov-02 Dec-02 Avg/yr 0.0256 0.0378 NPDES Permit Renewal 001 Flow Data 9/23102 Veeder Root NPDES permit renewal Subject: Veeder Root NPDES permit renewal Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2002 09:53:38 -0400 From: Jackie Nowell <jackie.nowell@ncmail.net> Organization: NC DENR DWQ To: dmartin@dancon.com Hello Mr. Martin, I'm working on the renewal of the subject permit and need some additional information in order to finalize the draft. Thank you for the priority pollutant analytical data and information on the production chemicals used in the process that you submitted last year. 1 am aware that your application has been inhouse for quite some time. Eowever, in order to complete the draft, we need to have three years of production data from the process flow. This would include 12 months of average process flow data for 1999, 2000, and 2001 and the maximum flow from each of those months. For example, we need the average flow for January 1999 and the maximum flow for January 1999, avg. flow for Feb. 1999 and max. flow for Feb. 1999, etc. The last permit renewal for Veeder Root, used a.monthly average process flow of 0.0263 MGD and a daily maximum process flow of 0.0444 MGD based on three years of data provided to DWQ by Henry Hatcher, plant engineer on 1/11/96. This information must be provided in order to develop your permit limitations for your new permit. This data may be emailed to me or faxed to 919-733-0719. Please call me at 919-733-5083 x 512 if there are any questions. Thank you. I of 1 9/ 1 1 /02 8:25 AM PUBLIC Ra WEST BROAD STREET r PO BOX 70 .731t1_ li`:LO�'JR NOTICE STATE OF EUZABETHTOWN. NC 26337 NORTH tiA ENvf• sre1ee2-41a3 FAX SRO eeY-6Bd2 ; z +• `='� L81` BY_ 11 i a/+7'c RONMCARO RONMENTAI MAN• QENIENT COMrMM. •'r•'r:. .+ s blNPUPOES L1NET 1517 MAIL St:RVIGE E45. 6 ADVERTISING INVOICE end STATEMENT +]. Oi? ENTER RA[,E1GM, 9 r . . c• .w � .• r FICATt OF I NOTE. ON OF INTER• NE-r-aIR E-'si,CfcRi .;!: LR 1SSUl_ q 1641hS;ii_ SEFi�r';GES' C;Er;TFF. X. jF ;6 NPOETO WATER PERMIT WASTE:- •'z`ALE-1i� Nc ti_i i.-SE i-; rU.,N1 7c c l 'rr•I Cr LuL 17•i1; On the th basis en_ e ough stars review arsd a aPPlication of NC - Gen•. eral Statule 143_24 Public law 92-500 anC other iawlul standards, the North - Carolina ahvirOnmental Man- 9ement COmmission proposes 10 National Pollu[am piss Charge Ehminatiorl --- - - - - --_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ --�-------------------- wastern lPDESj PLEASE DFIACH AND RETURN UPPER PORTION MIN YOUR REMITTANCE ewarer discharge eral't t° the Perso aSNdd below effect ve date °I this�n°lire�t�sh Written cOmmente regarding the proposed permit writ beuntw accepted publish daYs after the notice. AR ie cam of this ments care co sto re +ded In the final detarminations regarding the proposed Pe%mi1- The OfreCtor of the NC !)ivislan of Water Quality ma decide to held a publ:e meeting for the pro- d Posed permit shoul the Oivislon receive a _ + significant degree of . public interest. Copies or the drab and other supportlng infer. mation on rile used to determine Conditions . Present in the draft per_ mil are available upon 3 request and payment of the coBts-of repro- . auction. Nail Corn- -mortis and/or requests for information 10 the .HC'Ofvisf°n 01 Water Ouafity at the above address of -call . Ms. - wn rywrnvr. mrrrrcT r + � orxr•rQr+o+we eewrrrnsro..reo o , 1''�},u'117" rc errns..w+: Wru.o>r; 1011,15 %X) i SEC T EGf l- _ . -=..a, �.i i'F�- :l. �-r--'� "•��!NtT w•1_if`T•IPF.'v ----- �'r:'i I'iEi'JT6 ;., SC LEE Try:.=5 1 4. u,-LES REF 1;_,F- _P1i T1.1 ;J.0 i o I Nafery'•Ste'ptien6 at {ST$j;?33-50B3,'exien :: _ STATEMEM OF- sion 520: Please ' Inerud0.,,d1e `-NPOESe...... Parma- .. _•:., ni3mber ;[attaeh, in -any °om ., '-t`' municaGon. Interested, '' i x :�•i-1iE"$ - ,• .Persons may also vlsfi 'the'Division of'_Water = • . - 'Isis ELIZAB • Oliality at 512N. Salis- 111rry Street, Raleigh - NC ,.; 27844-•1149''' - '=ir'-• ac�•E' between the -hours of - •-•"=• 8:00 a.m. and 5:0G ;i •. P.m. to review informs- : •' r tlon on file. NPDES Peimir Num', bar NCD0011212Veed= - er Roar Company,/ 2100 West- Broad Stv ' Elizabethtown, . NC , 28337,has applied rot a permit renewal for a lacillty iocated In Bladen County dIT charging . treated wastewater into Cape Fear River in the Cap - e• Fear River Basin. Cur- - renity no parameters are water quality limit• ' so- This discharge may a. affect future allocations in this portion of the receiving stream. 10115- aeeouE�.:e«QF�iFetr:; �r. w _;. - _ 1y, :,; t'14� I y LADEN 'tIOURNAL ° P.O. BOX 70 - 'FAX (910) 6b2d+8C12 •'• .,..�_. • - . �'+l`F ..d, iY,..-ii! :: kw,... t-r• : - a i ".+�: - .ri, . J. 1:_,+ _ ETHTOWN, NC 29337 -1-.3 .3 ._ ,. it•: .. �'UHA►pUEe AMeIMfs ARM tlltlrreEe IN Tetli AMOdrrr eL -- -', k�3102 C%naz,l7 + L• iG �iC I1I��rrI__L r1� .. .. art• - .. t' -! 'y� AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION NORTH CAROLINA. Cumberland County. PURLIC NOTICE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT COMMISSION Before the undersigned. a Notary Public of said County and State. duly NPOEUNIT 1617MASSERVICE commissioned and authorized to adrninisLer oaths. affirmations, etc., personally CENTER RALEM'H. NC 77699-F617 NOTIFICATION OF INTENT TNT appeflred, r r5l;t„!Y L. (:a = _j; l., 0 Who. being duly sworn or affirmed. according to law. doth depose and sac- that Or the basis of thnrouoh staff review and aaalication he/she is LE!-'- =-, - SECT= :TAI? " of NC Ggnnral Star, 1A3,)1. Puh+ir- law s7-sea of THE FAYETTEVILLE PUBLISHING CO:N'IPANY)a corporation organized and Other lawful slandards and rnans. the North Carnffna and doing business under the Laws of the State of North Carolina. and publishing EnvEnvir ironmental Msn- aaamnnt Commission ern- oases to Issue National a newspaper known as the THE FAYETTEVILLE OBSERVER. in the City of a P.I. ,uteri 013charon Elimrnatian SvSTOM tNPDESI wastewater - Fayetteville. County and State aforesaid. and that as SUCK he/she makes this disc. CWMit he nelrsonLl listed hat awa w affidavit-, that he/she is familiar with the books, files and business of said tiva AS days from the puh- lishdateoflhfsnnrioe- Wntten comments Corporation and by reference to the files of said publication the attached reoard- ino the oronnsed nermit will M acceated until 30 days af- advertisement of LEGA - ,�- ;- T G C ter ilia aublisn date of this notice All comments re. rr;� �'. =^ r `' 1—r—Z• ,E.• r.C==• r C+f'-.MF At', r2od odor to that date are cgnsidered 5n fhq final -1etP.r. rnlnatlons feaardino fhe nro- aasod nermit. Tha D+rncral of thq NC Divisinn of W ter Duality may decide to hold a �t r.. 1 t _';\; r•. OUMic manlinn for the oro- of 1„ ansed Orr-cEivA sionihoulcant d +- Sion receive a sionilicant de- \Vas inserted in the aforesaid newE ter in s pace, and on dates as follows; PI p I grog of nubhc interest. Conies of thn draftnnrmir and other suonortino rotor- r;l(-TI:3 1 matfon on fife used to dq{er- mina Cnnditinns nresnnt in the draft permit are availahla _ uoon renunsr and oavanent of the casts of roorodurf+nn. and at i Mail cnmmanr Lionandforre" blication The Fayetteville Observer was a newspaper nieetiner all the requirements and puesls for information to the 0 fl NC Oivision of Water Quai+tV QLlahilCa' At the ahuve ad dross or cal€ - No- 1-551 V.S. of N. C. Mx. Valero Slaahnns at t9191 The a 733.508a, axtnnsinn s7ri. i from the btxpks and files of the aforesaid corporation and publication. Pteasx include tha NPDES nermit number fxttacbndl in anv communication_ Intarest- l 6 ad persons may also visit the Division of Wailer Ouain, r at 512 N. S.alishury Stranr. Ralefah- NC 77604-1 i4R he- 'wean the hours of R:@0 a.m. �J L_:--- :---. _EC-- 9�"TF� and 5100 O.M. to review infor- mation an file. NPDES Pe if Numher 1 '1" 1 , NCtp001171- Wader Rnor J 11 L Z.Yam; Cam»anv. 7100 West Rrnad J St. Effaatlerhtnwn. NC 2 R337 has Annlfed In, a perm+r ra. Sworn or affirmed to, and subscribed before MC, thi_ day wai far a facfliiv €ncatnd in (�:^ r l-Ji-�l=i'� -r -, •— Rladen Counfv discharoinc - treated wastewater into of . A.D,, Caoa Fear River in Th. Caoe Fear River Rasin, Currently no oaramatars are ware' nualily limited. This dis. In Testimony Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal. .harQF1 may affect tutus sun- the day and year aforesaid. cationin this nnftlan of the rResivina stream. 10/13 351877 Notary Public Q-9 Tr My commission expires day of XLML TO. NC OENP r 13UDGE-1 ❑r-FIC, PO BOX 2=535 I.F) R C ' C, —FACT SHEET 'DENR/ DWQ FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT NPDES No. NC0001121 Nnv 2w I I LIl1 Facility Information Applicant Facilit ame: Veeder- Root Company _Applicant.Addr-essrJ 1 2100 West Broad Street Elizabethtown NC 28337 M6iiiWAddF"ss7 2100 West Broad Street Elizabethtown NC 28337 Type of Waste: Industrial Facili Permit Status: Renewal Facility Classification II County: Bladen Miscellaneous .. . Receiving Stream: Cape Fear River Regional Office: Fayetteville Stream Classification: C USGS TooQuad: - I24NE 303 d Listed?: No Permit Writer: Jackie Nowell Subbasin: 03-06-16 Date: August 19, 2002 Drainage Area mil : 5016 -�-;" " c;,AlnmFr 7(110 rfs 74[i Winter 7Q10 (cfs): 914,'k+�.<, Avera e Flow cfst'.®, IWC Primary SIC Code: 4911 SUMMARY OF FACILITY INFORMATION AND WASTELOAD ALLOCATION Veeder-Root of North Carolina, Inc. has requested a permit renewal for their Veeder- Root manufacturing facility. The facility discharges into the Cape Fear River, a class C waters, in CPF16 subbasin. The Veeder-Root facility manufactures counters for flow meters and odometers, timers and relays, and voting machines and generates wastes that are treated on - site. Veeder-Root operates four outfalls, they are as follows: 001 - process wastewater treatment plant effluent 002 -- non -contact cooling wastewater 003 - treated ground water 004 - combined discharges from outfalls 001, 002, and 003 Domestic wastewater generated at the plant is treated at the Elizabethtown WWTP. 001 wastewater treatment Process - From the electroplating and coatings operation, Veeder- Root produces wastewater that contains chromium and cyanide. Because of their presence, the wastewater is classified as hazardous waste. The WWTP treats the chromium solutions in batch treatment tanks with concentrated sulfuric acid and sodium bisulfite to change the Cr fror�� its 1;exavalent ,ran to t ie 'L-ivaicnt form. The cyanide solutions are Treated in batch treatment tanks with caustic soda and sodium hypochlorite, creating a solution with a pH of 13 during cyanide destruction. The pH is adjusted to 8.3 to 8.8 and treated with sodium bisulfite to dechlorinate the water. A flocculent is added to the batch tanks, mixed, and settled for 24 hours before the effluent in pumped off to the clarifier. 002 noncontact cooling crater - Used in the plastic molding machines. Source of the water is potable water from the Town -of Elizabethtown. The water moves through passageways in the molding machines and out to a sump behind the plant. 003 Groundwater remediation system - Became operational for a volatile organic compound (VOCs) plume associated with the sludge drying beds. The system treated 75 to 90 gallons of water per minute. Groundwater is extracted from three wells and pumped into a 2500 gal. aeration treatment tank. An oil -less regenerative blower supplies approximately 50 SCFM (standard cubic feet per minute) of air into the tank through an injection system on the tank bottom. The aeration is used to remove volatile organic compounds and mix the caustic soda Veeder- Root Company Sheet NPDES Renewal Page 1 used to adjust the pH of the water. The plume consioted, of.1,2-dichlorobenzene, 1,1- dichloroethene (1,1-DCE), tetrachloroethene (PCE), toluene, and trichloroethene (TCE). Concentrations of the VOCs detected ranged from < 5 - 5.3 ug/l. . Previous NPDES permit categorized Veeder Root as a metal finisher with applicable effluent guidelines from 40 CFR 433.13(a) BPT and 433.14(a) BAT. Guidelines as of July 1, 1998 are as follows: , Pollutant Maximum for Monthly Average �-- • - --_ _ __� any 1 day not to exceed Milligrams per liter (mg/1) Cadmium 0.69 0.26 Chromium 2.77 1.71 Copper 3.38 2.07 Lead 0.69 0.43 Nickel 3.98 2.38 Silver 0.43 0.24 Zinc 2.61 1.48 Cyanide 1.20 0.65 TTO 2.13 ---- Oil & Grease 52.00 26 TSS 60.00 31 pH 6-9 6-9 In development of limits for renewal of the permit, facility had to provide three years of production data. Data provided included the average monthly process flow for 1999 - 2001 of 0.0234 MGD and the average of maximum flows for 1999 - 2001 of 0.0359 MGD. The highest flow in the past three years is 0.0964 MGD. Veeder-Root indicated that they, anticipated process flows to increase due to higher production levels, however since specific increased flow could not be documented, the average monthly process flow provided was used to estimate effluent limitations for pollutants. The average monthly flow was used to develop both daily maximum and monthly average mass limits. (Limits developed in the previous permit issued in July 1996 used average monthly process flow to calculate monthly average limits and used the highest maximum flow to calculate daily maximum flows. This method was incorrect and has been corrected with this renewal. This is the reason for the reduction in daily maximum limits from the previous permit.) The recommended limits for the renewal permit are as follows: Pollutant Mo. Avg. )Da. Max. ll h/dari l Cadmium 0.05 0.13 Chromium 0.33 0.54 Copper 0.40 0.66 Lead 0.08 0.13 Nickel 0.46 0.78 Silver 0.05 0.08 Zinc 0.29 0.51 Cyanide 0.13 0.23 TTO ---- 0.42 Oil & Grease 5.1 10.15 TSS 6.0 11.71 Application indicates the following constituents present in the effluent from 001: sulfate, sulfite, cyanide, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, nickel, silver, sodium, zinc, oil and grease, and surfactants. Constituents present in effluent from 002: zinc. Constituents present in effluent from 003: zinc and chlorinated organic compounds. Veeder- Root Company Sheet NPDES Renewal Page 2 Following constituents present in the effluent from 004: sulfate, sulfite, cyanide, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, nickel, silver, sodium, zinc, chlorinated organic compounds, oil and grease, and surfactants. Existing Effluent Limits Outfall 001 - process wastewater Qw = No limit Outfall 002 - noncontact cooling water Qw = No limit Outfall 003 - groundwater remediation Qw = 0.152 MGD Quarterly monitoring for perchloroethylene Outfall 004 - combined flows from outfalls 001, 002 and 003 Guideline limits for cadmium, chromium, Copper, lead, nickel, silver, zinc, cyanide, oil and grease, TSS, and TTO. Monitoring for temperature and residual chlorine. Acute Toxicity Fathead Minnow 24hr @ 90%; Mar June Sept Dec RECEIVING STREAM INFORMATION: The Cape Fear River is not listed on North Carolina's 2000 303(d) list. INSTREAM MONITORING: Not required TOXICITY TEST RESULTS: 24 hour Acute P/ F, 90% fathead minnow test. Veeder Root has a very good WET testing record. Since 1998, facility has -consistently passed the acute toxicity test. There were FAILs in Sept. 1998, March 1999, and Sept 2001. Results of pollutant scan for 004 4 2�001 Copper 0.0024 mg/1 (2.4 ug/1) Zinc 0.016 mg/1 (16 ug/1) Tetrachloroethene 6.9 ug/l CORRESPONDENCE REVIEW; 7/10/02 - Compliance Evaluation Inspection -All Satisfactory w/ N/A for lab, pretreatment and compliance schedule *Flow is measured by the potable water meters (2) at the plating .001 process flow meter (groundwater remediation) on .003 and monthly reading of water meters at molding machines for .002 (plastics section). ' 1/23/2002- Notice of Deficiency for April, August, September and October 2001- For outfall 004 failure to include units of measurement for all parameters for all reviewed months. For October 2001, failure to incl,_,de the parameter Code for toxicity 11/26/2001 - late Effluent tox test 11 /26/01 - Notice Of Violation (NOV) - tox test in 9/01 5/31 /01 -Compliance Inspection Report. All areas were graded Satisfactory, except N/A on the laboratory- and compliance schedule 2/6/2001 - Payment acknowledgement of civil assessment $7138.76 6/ 1 /2000 - Summary of penalties accrued between May 1999 and December 1999. Zinc, Chromium and TSS Violations. Total fine after 80% reduction - $10,096.51. 7/30/ 1999 Evaluation of discharges done by Aquaterra Engineering. 8/3/ 1999 - Application for SOC for lower zinc limits that went into effect on July 1, 1998 7/23/ 1999 - NOV and assessment of civil penalty $1572. 19 for zinc violations in March 1999. 7/23/ 1999 - NOV and assessment of civil penalty $1072.19 for zinc violations in April 1999. 5/21 /99 - NOV for toxicity test 5/21 /99 - NOV and assessment of civil penalty $1072.19 for zinc violations in January 1999. 5/21/99 - NOV and assessment of civil penalty $2572.19 for zinc and chromium violations in February 1999. Veeder- Root Company Sheet NPDES Renewal Page 3 2/ 16/99 - Payment acknowledgement of civil assessment $1072•.ly - - 1/8/99 - NOV and assessment of civil penalty $1072.19 for TSS violations in August 1998. 11/22/ 1999 - Remission request of civil penalty assessment - no grounds found to modify the civil penalty of $1572.19 10/6/ 1999 - NOV for Cr in August 1999 9/21 /99 - Request for remission of Civil Penalty. Letter from attorneys received 8/23/99 requesting remission: 8/27/99 -- tax test results 12/ 17/98 - NOV for Zn in 9/98 11/23/98- NOV for tax test in 9./98 9/23/98 - NOV for TSS in July 1998 PROPOSED CHANGES: 0 Limits and monitoring requirements for Outfall 004 have been modified based on use of updated average production flow data to develop mass based limits for parameters of cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, nickel, silver,zinc, cyanide, TTO, oil and grease, and TSS. PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE: Draft Permit to Public Notice: 10/ 16/2002 Permit Scheduled to Issue: . 12/06/2002 Projected Effective Date of Permit: 01/01/2003 0 29 s .W •y PROMSED TECiiDIOLOGY BASED L1M1TS This permit contains technology based limits for cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, nickel, silver, zinc, cyanide, TTO, oil and grease, and TSS. STATE CONTACT: If you have any questions on any of the above information or on the attached permit, please contact Jackie Nowell at (919) 733-5083 ext. 512. NAM . �j '� rf'l lL DATE: REGIONAL OFFICE COMMENT: NAME: °lie DATE: Il — Cif Veeder- Root Company Sheet NPDES Renewal Page 4 DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY .tune 1, 2001 r MEMORANDUM TO: Valery Stephens ! t NPDES PorrO Unit i 1 , Cr FROM: Paul Rawls y Fayetteville Regional Office a SUBJECT: Renewal of NPDES Permit No. NC0001121 r�!~� Veeder Root Company W WTP Bladen County Please find enclosed the staff report and recommendations of the Fayetteville Regional Office concerning the renewal of subject NPDES Permit. If you have any questions or require any further information, please advise. PR/bs Enclosure cc: Kitty Kramer (Staff Repon and ather information) SOC PRIORITY PROJECT Yes_ No X To: Permits and Engineering Unit Water Quality Section Attention: Valery Stephens Date: June 1 2001 NON -DISCHARGE STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION County: Baden Permit No. NC 0001121 PART I - GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Facility and Address: Veeder Root Company PO Box 368 Elizabethtown, NC 28337 2. Date of Investigation. May 31, 2001 3. Report Prepared by: Paul Rawls Fayetteville Regional Office 4. Persons Contacted and Telephone Number: David Martin, Facility Engineer (910) 862-5400 5. Directions to Site: The plant is located on the north side of NC Hwy 87, approximately 1.4 miles north of Elizabethtown. 6. Discharge Point(s). List for all discharge points: Latitude: 340 38' 55" Longitude: 780 37' 30" Attach a U.S.G.S. map extract (attached). U.S.G.S. Quad No.: 2�_4 NE U.S.G.S, Quad Name: Elizabethtown, NQ 7. Site size and expansion area adequate. 8. Topography: Site is flat and adjacent to the Cape Fear River. The site does not appear to be in the 100 year flood plain. 9. Location of nearest dwelling: None within 1000 feet. PART I -GENERAL INFORMATION 10. Receiving stream or affected surface waters: Cape Fear River a. Classification: Class "C" Index No. 18-(26) b. River Basin and Subbasin No. 0306 16 C. Describe the receiving stream features and pertinent downstream uses: The upstream discharges of this plant are Cogentrixs, Alamac Knitting and Carolina Foods. The immediate downstream discharge is Elizabethtown. Downstream uses are secondary recreation, fishing and wildlife propagation. PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS a. Volume of wastewater to be permitted: 0.17 MGD pipe 001 b. What is the current permitted capacity of the Wastewater Treatment facility: 0.17 MGD pipe 001 C. Actual treatment capacity of the current facility: 0.17 MGD pipe 001 This facility has four (4) outfalls: 001 Main process wastewater 0.17 MGD O.q 7 qM 6;0 002 Non -contact cooling water 0.152 MGD' 003 Groundwater remediation 0.152 MGD 004 Combination of all above discharges A1� 1 domesfic wastewater generated -at this facility is treated -by -the -Town-of�) Elizabethtown tr. d. Date(s) and construction activities allowed by previous Authorization to Construct issued in the previous two (2) years: None e. Please provide a description of the existing or substantially constructed wastewater treatment facilities: The existing 001 WWTP that handles the process wastewater consists of one (1) chrome and one (1) cyanide batch treatment tank, acid -alkaline holding tank, a final clarifier, a plate and frame press. Discharge 002 is untreated non -contact cooling water. Discharge 003 is ground water treated via packed tower only. 004 is the combined discharge from 001, 002 and 003. f. Please provide a description of the proposed wastewater treatment facilities: NIA g. Possible toxic impacts to surface waters: Chromium, copper, nickel, zinc, cyanide and solvents. PART II - DESCRIPTION OF DISCHARGE AND TREATMENT WORKS (continued) h. Pretreatment Program (POTWS only): in development approved should be required not needed X 2. Residuals handling and utilization/disposal scheme: a. If residuals are being land applied, please specify DWQ Permit No. Residual Contractor: Telephone Number: b. Residuals stabilization: PSRP PFRP Other C. Landfill: d. Other disposal/utilization scheme (Specify): Disposal of all residuals are permitted through Solid & Hazardous Waste Section. The dried residuals are placed in barrels and taken by Safety-Kleen Corporation for disposal. 3 Treatment plant classification (attach complete rating sheet): This is a Class II plant. 4. SIC Code(s): 3824 Wastewater Code(s) of actual wastewater not particular to facilities: Primary 52 Secondary 14 Main Treatment Unit Code: 5 1 0 0 2 PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION 1. Is this facility being constructed with Construction Grants Funds or are any public monies involved (municipals only)? NIA 2. Special monitoring or limitations (including Toxicity) requests: None requested 3. Important SOC, JOC or Compliance Schedule dates (please indicate): NIA Date Submission of Plans and Specifications N/A Begin Construction N/A Complete Construction N/A PART III - OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION (continued) 4. Alternative Analysis Evaluation: Has the facility evaluated all of the non -discharge options available. Please provide regional perspective for each option evaluated: NIA a. Spray Irrigation: b. Connection to Regional Sewer System: c. Subsurface: d. Other Disposal Options: 5. Other Special Items: None PART IV - EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS It is the recom nendation of the Fayetteville Regional Office that NPDES Permit No. NC0001121 for Veeder Root Company be reissued in keeping with basinwide strategy. Wafer Quality Regional Supervisor / /0/ Date DANAHER CONTROLS ELIZABETHTOWN WATER USUAGE Date: 10/10/00 Total Used: 5,207,000 Gallons The above breaks down as follows: Department Gallons % of Total Disposition Plastics 1A 2,524,250 48.5 To River) Hydraulic Pump 0 0 To River) Non Contact Broach GM1 3,936 0.1 To River) Cooling Welders/Grinder GM2 9,000 0.2 HC, OC, ZDC, SSC, VC To River) RTC, TWMC (- To Plating) 1,200,980 23.0 PlatingfWaste D-C Waste Disposal Treatment (+ From Plastic's Drain) 657,779 12.6 Boiler 70,770 1.4 Storm Drain Heat Treat 8,749 0.2 Storm Drain Air Conditioner Storm Drain Joy Comp.Nac.Pump 170,640 3.3 Domestic, (Cleaning, 560,896 10.7 City Sewer Painting & EVM) Gallons to Cape Fear River 3,73$,166 36 Gallons to D-C Waste Disposal 657,779 / ZA/ Gallons to Storm Drain 250,159 4Reprepaired ity Sewer 560,896 Total 5,207,000 y:To Plating from Plastics 176 rtin Gallons. Copies. Town DMM JRT Accts. Payable I 10/11 /00 Excel llDlDmmlWaterlSewer Supplemental Data Production Data Veeder-Root manufactures many products at the facility including counters for flow meters and odometers, timers and relays, and voting machines. However, not all the products result in wastewater generation that requires treatment at the wastewater treatment plant (W WTP). Rather than try to correlate the number of counters, timers, relays, or voting machines to the production of wastewater, Veeder-Root has looked at the raw chemical purchases for the plating and coating department. The plating and coating department is the primary source of wastewater treated at the WWTP. Eight chemicals were selected to track the generation of wastewater during the production of finished goods. Other chemicals are used such as sulfuric acid, nitric acid, etc. but their volume used is dependent on the usage of the eight selected chemicals. These chemicals are: • Actane 342 • Chromium • Iridite • Nickel Sulfate • Soap Cleaner • Sodium Cyanide • Zinc • Zinc Brightener Table 1 is a summary of the usage of these chemicals from 1995 through 2000. Figure I shows the use of Iridite and zinc brightener. As can be seen in Table 1 and Figure 1, the usage of these chemicals have been declining from 1995 through 2000. Figure 2 shows the usage of Actane 342 and soap cleaner. The amount of Actane 342 and soap cleaner has been declining since 1995. Figure 3 shows a similar decline in the usage of chromium, nickel sulfate, and sodium cyanide. The spikes in the plots for Iridite (1997), nickel sulfate (1997), and Actane 342 (1997) represent volume purchases for cost savings and not actual usage. The data shown confirms that Veeder-Root is reducing the volume of plating and coating and thereby reducing the volume of wastewater to be treated and discharged through Outfall 001, P:/Viceder- Root/01900/Reports/01 149-Production Data Figure 1 Use of Production Chemicals in Plating/Coating Department 3,000 2,500 1 --- as 2,000 v �E 1, 500 --- — U w 0 c 1,000 -----_.-__ R t9 500 0 A. 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Years !0 Iridite Zinc Brightener Linear Iridite --Linear (Zinc Brightened P:Needer-Root/OI90WENcel/Plating Material Purchases `seeder -Root of North Carolina, Inc. Permit No. NCOOO 1211 2000 2001 14,000 12,000 d 10,000 as s W 8,000 E a� r v 6,000 w 0 w c 0 4,000 2,000 0 1 Sv-r Veeder-Root of North Carolina, Inc. Permit No. NC0001211 Figure 2 Use of Production Chemicals in Plating/Coating Department iatoo 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Years +► ° Soap Cleaner —0- Actane 342 Linear (Actane 342) —Linear (Soap Cleann j P:Needer-Root/OI900/Excel/Plating Material Purchases Figure 3 Use of Production Chemicals in Plating/Coating Department 2,500 - - - - 2,000 M a 1,500 E 500 0 t_- 1994 Veeder-Root of North Carolina, Inc. Permit No. NC0001211 ' vz?u I yJ6 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Years --Chromium--•-s-Na Cyanide Ni - Sulfate -Zinc Linear (Ni Sulfate) Linear (Na Cyanide) ---Linear (Chromium) --Linear (Zinc) P:Needer-Root/01900/Excel/Plating Material Purchases Veeder Root- Metal finisher effluent guidelines converted to mass limits Pollutant Cadmium Chromium Copper Lead Nickel Silver Zinc Cyanide TTO Oil & Grease TSS pH Avg. Process Flow (mqd) 0.0234 0.0234 0.0234 0.0234 0.0234 0.0234 0.0234 0.0234 0.0234 0.0234 0.0234 Monthly Avg. Avg. Process (m9m Flow (mqd) 0.26 0.0234 1.71 0.0234 2.07 0.0234 0.43 0.0234 2.38 0.0234 0.24 0.0234 1.48 0.0234 0.65 0.0234 26 0.0234 31 0.0234 6-9 Monthly Av (pounds/day) 0.05 0.33 0.40 0.08 0.46 0.05 0.29 0.13 5.07 6.05 .per recommendation of DAG, used 3 yr.(1999-2001) avg.process flow for determining limits for mo. avg. and da. max Pollutant Da. Max. (#Id) Mo. Avg. (#1d) Cadmium 0.13 0.05 Chromium 0.54 0.33 Copper 0.66 0.40 Lead 0.13 0.08 Nickel 0.78 0.46 Silver 0.08 0.05 Zinc 0.51 0.29 Cyanide 0.23 0.13 TTO 0.42 --- Oil & Grease 10.15 5.07 TSS 11.71 6.05 pH 6-9 6-9 Existing Limits Pollutant Da. Max. (#/d) Mo. Avg. (#Id) Cadmium 0.26 0.06 Chromium 1.03 0.38 Copper 1.25 0.45 Lead 0.26 0.09 Nickel 1.47 0.52 Silver 0.16 0.05 Zinc 0.97 0.32 Cyanide 0.44 0.14 TTO 2.13 mgll ---- Oil & Grease 19.26 5.70 TSS 22.22 6.80 pH 6-9 6-9 10/8/02 Veeder Root- Metal finisher effluent guidelines converted to mass limits Pollutant Cadmium Chromium Copper Lead Nickel Silver Zinc Cyanide TTO Oil & Grease TSS pH m11.� 277 0.43 s , � 2a 2 13:;: .. .6-9 . ..` Avg. Process Flow (mqd) 0.0234 = Da. Max.: -: fpoundsfday) Monthly Avg. (mgll) 0.26 Avg. Process Flow (mqd) 0.0234 Monthly Avg. (pounds/day) = 0.05 D.13 0.0234 - 0.54.. 1.71 0.0234 = 0.33 0.0234 = .. ,; _0,66°;;;�' 2.07 0.0234 = 0.40 0.0234 - Q;13 0.43 0.0234 - 0.08 0.0234 - 0 78 2.38 0.0234 = 0.46 0,0234 = A.DB 0.24 0.0234. = 0.05 0.0234 = 11:51 1,48 0.0234 = , 0.29 0.0234 - 23 . .; 0.65 0.0234 = 0.13 0.0234 = D;42„ - - - - 0.0234 = 1 a 15 , _;� 26 0.0234 = 5.07 0.0234 11'..71 a 31 0.0234 = 6.05 6-9 .per recommendation of DAG, used 3 yr.(1999-2001) avg,process flow for determining limits for mo. avg. and da. max. Pollutant Da. Max. (#/d) Mo. Avg. #Id Cadmium 0.13 0.05 Chromium 0.54 0.33 Copper 0.66 0.40 Lead 0.13 0.08 Nickel 0.78 0.46 Silver 0.08 0.05 Zinc 0.51 0.29 Cyanide 0.23 0.13 TTO 0.42 ---- Oil & Grease 10.15 5.07 TSS 11.71 6.05 pH 6-9 6-9 Existing Limits Pollutant Da. Max. (#Id) Mo, Avg. (#Id) Cadmium 0.26 0.06 Chromium 1.03 0.38 Copper 1.25 0.45 Lead 0.26 0.09 Nickel 1.47 0.52 Silver 0.16 0.05 Zinc 0.97 0.32 Cyanide 0.44 0.14 TTO 2.13 mg/i ---- Oil& Grease 19.26 5.70 TSS 22.22 6.80 pH 6-9 6-9 10/8/02 11 j644" 4.,t X-. * A,9- -� O-Z q g %l�iUM azo �.Je-P, (100 t 012%3 r�3b'3 //mom o YY,07 J7l 6 , vz � 4)y3 7 c)Z9/ 039,9 eEl /6t, s 'i Z " ovaj 5-1a `' f d z 5''� r 1; 94 �41�_; F ��s3" 63/z- �G�✓ �i)Z/3 . ayA L�6eJ rC%/jr'/ o atl 6 i oe'z aaY -f"I�/C "049, 4 A,4K (1 Zb O p�5� S�Of s(J/gz rU9��j' a z 5` , 6,3 K- z- P Facility Name = Veeder Root W WTP NPDES # = NC0001121 Ow (MGD) = 0.17 7010s (cfs)= 740 IWC (V.) = 0.04 RecVing Stream Cape Fear River Stream Class WS-IV FINAL RESULTS Tetrachloroethelene Max. Fred Cw 53.13 Allowable Cw 2247.5 Max Value 23.1 Cadmium (Cd) Max. Fred Cw 13 Allowable Cw 5618.7 Max Value 10 Chromium (Cr) Max. Pred Cw 30 Allowable Cw 140467.5 Max Value 20 Copper (Cu) Max. Pred Cw 41 Allowable Cw 19665.4 Max Value 10 Cyanide Max. Fred Cw 47.6 Allowable Cw 14046.7 Max Value 28 Lead (Pb) Max. Fred Cw 19 Allowable Cw 70233.7 Max Value 10 Mercury (Hg) Max. Fred Cw a Allowable Cw 33.7 Max Value 0 Nickel (Ni) Max. Fred Cw 14 Allowable Cw 70233.7 Max Vatue 10 Selenium (Se) Max. Fred Cw 0 Allowable Cw 14046.7 Max Value 0 Silver (Ag) Max. Pred Cw 5 Allowable Cw 168.6 Max Value 5 Zinc (Zn) Max. Pred Cw 90 Allowable Cw 140467.5 Max Value 50 Parameter= Tetrachlaroelhelene Parameter= Cadmium (Cd) Standard = 0.8 NgA Standard = j 2 NgA n BDL=112DL Actual Data RESULTS n BDL-112DL Actual Data 1 23.1 23.1 Std Dev. 6,56209534 1 5 <10 2 21.8 21.8 Mran 16.705 2 5 <10 3 19.1 19.1 G.V. 0.39880846 3 5 <10 4 864 8,64 4 5 <10 5 9.44 9.44 5 5 -10 6 8.26 8.26 Mult Factor = 2.3 6 5 <10 7 21.5 21.5 Max, Value 23.1 Ngrl 7 5 -10 8 21.8 21.8 Max, Pted Cw 53.13 Ngtl 8 5 -10 9 Allowable Cw 2247,5 Ngtl 9 5 <10 10 10 5 <10 11 11 5 <10 12 12 10 10 13 13 10 10 14 14 10 10 15 15 10 10 16 16 10 10 17 17 10 10 18 18. 5 <10 19 19 5 <10 20 20 5 <10 21 21 10 10 22 22 5 <10 23 23 5 <10 24 24 5 <10 25 25 5 <10 26 26 5 <10 27 27 5 <10 28 28 5 <10 29 29 5 <10 30 30 5 <10 31 31 5 <10 32 32 5 <1.0 33 33 5 <10 34 34 5 <10 35 35 5 <10 36 36 5 <10 37 37 5 <10 38 38 5 <10 39 39 5 <10 40 40 5 <10 41 41 5 <10 42 42 5 <10 43 43 5 <10 44 44 5 410 45 45 5 410 45 45 5 <10 47 47 4B 48 49 49 50 50 51 RESULTS Sid Day. 1.815792 Mean 576087 C.V. 0315194 Mutt Factor Max. Value 10 }jgtl Max. Pred Cw 13 ygA Allowable Cw 5618.7 Ng4 Parameter= Chromium (Cr) Standard = 50 yjgll n BDL=112DL Actual Data 1 5 -10 2 5 �10 3 5 <10 4 5 <10 5 5 <10 6 5 <10 7 5 -10 8 5 <10 9 5 <10 10 5 <10 11 5 <10 12 20 20 13 10 10 14 t0 10 15 10 10 16 10 10 17 10 10 18 5 <10 19 5 <10 20 10 10 21 10 10 22 5 -10 23 5 <10 24 5 <10 25 5 <10 26 5 -10 27 5 <10 28 5 <10 29 5 <10 30 5 <10 31 5 <10 32 5 <10 33 5 <10 34 5 <10 35 5 <10 36 5 _ <10 37 5 <10 38 5 <10 39 5 <10 40 5 <10 41 5 <10 42 5 <to 43 10 10 44 10 10 45 10 10 46 5 <10 47 48 49 5C 40 RESULTS Std Dev. 2.9179603B Mean 6.4130434B C.V. 0.45500399 Mutt Factor= 1,5 Max, Value 20 Ngtl Max. Pred Cw 30 NgA Allowable Cw 140467.5 ugA Parameter = Standard Cop er (Cu) 7 Ngll BDL=112DL Actual Data 5 <10 5 <10 5 <10 5 -10 5 <10 5 <10 5 <10 5 <10 5 -10 5 <10 5 <10 5 <10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 5 <i0 5 <10 5 <10 10 10 5 <10 5 <10 5 <10 5 -10 5 <10 5 <10 5 <10 5 <10 5 <10 5 <10 5 <10 5 <10 5 <10 5 <10 5 <10 5 <10 5 <10 5 <1❑ 5 <10 5 <10 5 <10 5 <10 5 <10 5 <10 5 <10 10 10 RESULTS Sid Dev. 1,7993729 Mean 574468085 C.V. 0.31322417 Mult Factor Max, Value 10 Ngll Max. Prod Cw 41 Ng/l Allowable Cw 19665.4 u911 Parameter= Cyanide Standard = 5 p9A n BDL=112DL Actual Data 1 5 <10 2 5 <10 3 5 <10 4 5 <10 5 5 <10 6 5 <10 7 5 <10 8 5 <10 9 5 <10 10 5 -10 11 5 <10 12 5 <10 13 10 10 14 10 10 15 10 10 16 10 10 17 10 10 18 5 <10 19 5 <10 20 10 10 21 10 10 22 5 <10 23 5 <10 24 5 <10 25 5 <10 26 5 <10 27 5 <10 28 5 <10 29 5 <10 30 5 <10 31 5 <10 32 5 <10 33 10 10 34 10 10 35 10 10 36 5 -10 37 5 <10 38 5 00 39 5 <10 40 5 <10 41 5 <10 42 5 <10 43 5 <10 44 10 10 45 5 <10 46 5 <10 47 5 <10 48 49 50 51 RESULTS Std Dev. 3.79599453 Mean 6.625 C.V. 0.57298031 Mutt Factor Max. Value 28 ug11 Max. Prod Cw 47.6 ugll Allowable Cw 14046,7 Ngll Parameter = Lead (Pb) Standard = 25 µg11 n BDL=112DL Actual Data 1 5 <10 2 5 <10 3 5 <10 4 5 <10 5 5 <10 6 5 <10 7 5 -10 8 5 -10 9 5 <10 10 5 <10 11 5 <10 12 5 <10 13 10 10 14 10 10 15 5 <10 16 5 <10 17 5 <10 18 5 -10 19 5 <10 20 5 <10 21 5 <10 22 5 <10 23 5 <10 24 5 <10 25 5 <10 26 5 -10 27 5 <10 28 5 <10 29 5 <10 30 5 <10 31 5 <10 32 5 <10 33 5 <10 34 5 <10 35 5 <10 36 5 <10 37 5 <10 38 5 <10 39 5 <10 40 5 <10 41 5 <10 42 5 <10 43 5 <10 44 5 <10 45 5 -10 46 5 <10 47 48 49 50 40 RESULTS Std Dev. 1.03092285 Mean 5.2173913 C.V. 0,19759355 MultFactor= 1_9 Max. Value 10 Ngll Max. Pred Cw 19 0gll Allowable Cw 70233.7 pgll Parameter= Mercury (Hg) Standard = 0.012 n BDL=112DL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 45 47 48 49 50 40 I Nan Actual Data Parameter = Nickel Ni Standard = 1 251 pgtl RESULTS n BDL=112DL Actual Data RESULTS Sid Dev. #DIVrO! 1 5 <10 Sid Dev. 2.36979789 Mean #DIVrO! 2 5 <10 Mean 6,63043478 C.V. #DIVrO! 3 5 <10 C.V. 0,35741214 4 5 <10 5 5 <10 Mutt Factor = 2.4 6 5 <10 Mutt Factor Max, Value 0 pgll 7 5 <10 Max. Value 10 pgfI Max, Pred Cw 0 pgll 8 5 <10 Max. Prod Cw 14 pg/I Allowable Cw 33.7 pgll 9 5 <10 'Allowable Cw 70233.7 pgfl 10 5 <10 11 5 <10 12 5 <10 13 10 10 14 10 10 15 10 10 16 10 10 17 10 10 18 5 <10 19 5 <10 20 10 10 21 10 10 22 5 <10 23 5 <10 24 5 <10 25 5 <10 26 5 <10 27 5 <10 28 5 <10 29 5 <10 30 5 <10 31 10 10 32 10 10 33 1C 10 34 10 10 35 5 <10 36 5 <10 37 5 <10 38 5 <10 39 5 <10 40 5 <10 41 5 <10 42 5 <10 43 10 10 44 10 10 45 10 10 46 10 10 47 48 49 50 40 Parameter Selenium Se) Standard = 5 pgn n BDL=112DL Actual Data RESULTS 1 Sid Dev. #DIVIO! 2 Mean #DIVIO! 3 C.V. #DIVIO! 4 5 6 Mult Factor 7 Max. Value 0 pgn 8 Max. Prod Cw 0 pgn 9 Allowable Cw 14046,7 pg1l 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 40 ParameterSilver (Ag) Standard = 0.06 pgn n BDL=1f2DL Actual Data 1 5 <50 2 5 <10 3 5 <10 4 5 <10 5 5 <10 5 5 <10 7 5 <10 8 5 <10 9 5 <1D 10 5 <10 11 5 <10 12 5 <10 13 5 <10 14 5 <10 15 5 <10 15 5 <10 17 5 <10 18 5 <10 19 5 <10 20 5 <10 21 5 OD 22 5 <10 23 5 <10 24 5 <10 25 5 <10 26 5 <10 27 5 <10 28 5 <10 29 5 <10 30 5 <10 31 5 OD 32 5 <10 33 5 <10 34 5 <10 35 5 <10 36 5 <10 - 37 5 <10 38 5 <10 39 5 <10 40 5 <10 41 5 <10 42 5 <10 43 5 <10 44 5 <10 45 5 <10 46 5 <10 47 48 49 50 40 RESULTS Std Dev, Mean C.V, Mult Factor = 0 Max, Value 5 ygtl Mar, Pred Cw 5 ygrl Allowable Cw 168.6 ugtl Parameter= Zinc {2:n} Standard = 50 NgA n 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 40 BDL-112DL 10 10 30 20 5 5 5 10 20 20 20 10 10 10 10 10 20 30 20 20 10 10 10 5 50 20 20 10 10 10 30 10 10 10 30 20 5 40 5 10 20 20 30 30 30 20 Actual Data <20 -20 30 20 <10 <10 <10 10 20 20 20 10 10 10 10 10 20 30 20 20 10 10 10 <10 50 20 20 10 10 10 30 10 10 10 30 20 <10 40 <10 10 20 20 30 30 30 20 RESULTS Sid Dev. 10.177174 Mean 16,73913 C.V. 0.607987 Mull Factor Max. Value 50 Max. Pred Cw 90 Allowable Cw 140467.5 Whole Effluent Toxicity Testing Self -Monitoring Summary September 18, 20 FACTI•ITY REQUIREMENT YEAR )AN FIiB MAR APR MAN' JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DFC ' 1JS11C Camp LeJeunc Hadnol Pt W W'FI' 001 Perm chr lim- 5 % Mysid PF 1990 Pass -- -- Pass - -- Pass --- -• Pass - - NCU063029iM1 Begin:2lI011999 Frequency:QP1F + Jan Apr Jul Oct + Nonccmp:Single 1999 Pass -- -• Pass -• - Pass - -- P.-my - - Counly: Ouslow Region: WIRO Subbasin: WOK02 2000 B1 -- - Passmy -- -- Pass - - Pass - - PF: 8.0 Special 2001 Pass - -- Pass -- -- Pass -- -- Pass - -- 7QIU: TIDAL IWC(%):NA Order: 2002 Pass -- -- Pass - -- Pass USNIC Cherry Point Perm chr lim: 14% 1998 Pass - Leta Pass --- Pass -- -- Paas -- - Pass NCO003816/M1 Begin-10/1l20W Frequency: Q Mar Jun Sep Dec + NonComp:Singlr 1999 - -- Pasa - --- Late Fail �56,>80 Pass - -- Pass County: Craven Region: WARO Subbasin: NEI110 2000 - - Pass -- -- Pass - -- Pass -- -- Pass PF: 3.5 special 2001 -•- -- Pass - - NP1Pass -- -- Late Pass •-- Pass 7QIU:'rIDAL IWC %);14,U Order: 2002 --- -- Pass -- »- Pass USNIC CherqPoint Jl114 Perm 24hr ac plFmonit 900% Dhd (grab) 1998 - -- I -- - -- -- 1 - -- I NCW03816/l 14 Begin: I0fl/20W Frequrncy: Q Mar Jun Sep Dec NonComp: 1999 --- --- -- --- I •- -- V - - I County: Curren Region: WARO Subbmin: NFUIU 2000 -- -- V -• •- 1 --- - 1 --- _- 1 PF: VAR special 2001 7QI0: OM IWC{%);100 O.acr. 2002 -- -- t - -- I - US?IC Cherq Point 136 Perm 24hr pJrac monit 90% AW (grabl 1990 --- - Pass --- - Pass - -- Pass - - Pe.. NCUW3816/136 Begin: I U)II2UW Frequency: Q Mar Jun Sep Dec NonComp: 1999 - -- Pass - - Pass - -- Pass - -- P.. County: Crrven Region: WARD Subbesin: NE•UIU 2000 - --- Pass -- -- Pas. - - Pass - -- Pass IT: VAR Special 2001 -- -- Pass -- -- NRIPaw - --- Pass - -- Pass 7QIU: u,u IWCI%):100 Orden 2002 -- -- Pass - - Pass -- Valdese WWI P Perm chr lira: 4 B%; irpf I0.5MUD chr lim 6.6% 199B Late Pasa -- Pass -- -- Pam -- - Late Pass -- NCW41696/MI Begin:3111201 Frequency: Q Jan Apr Jul Oct + NonComp;Single 1999 Pass - -- Pas. -- - Pasa -- -• Pass - -- County: Burke Region: ARO Subbasin: CTB31 2000 Paws) -- -- Pass(s) -- - Pawls) - -- Pass -- - PF: 7.5 Spcciat 2001 FaiT 12 6.8 Pass -- -- Pass(s) -- - Pawls) -- - 7QIO:22S,7 1WC(%):4,8 Order; 2002 Pasa(s) -- - Pass($) V.lero Nlerkaing and Supply Cu. Perm 24hr LC50 ac monit epis Ilhd (grab) 199e -- --- -- - - >700 - -- -- -- - -- NCWW72Y00l Begin:9111Z001 Frequency: A NonComp: 1999 -» -100 -• -- -- --- --- --- -» -- - -- County; Meeklamburg Region; MRO Subbasin: CTB34 2000 '100 -- -- -- --- -- -- - -- - »- -• IT: NA special 2001 >100 - -• -- - -- - - - - -- --- 7Q10:00 IWC(%):NA Ord- 20C2 -100 -- --- -- --- -- - Velcro Marketing and Supptv Co. PERM: 24 hr LC50 ac monil epis 111ad (grab) 1998 -- -- - -- - -- -- -- - - >100 - NCW764571M1 Begm:9ll/1999 Frequency; A NonComp: 190 -- -- -- -- --- --- --- -- -•- - -- NRlH County: Johnston Region: RRO Subbasin: NEU02 2" -- -- -- -- -- - -- - -- -- ..- NR)H PF: VAR special 2001 -_- 7QIU:OM 1WC(%)a OO.0 Order: 2002 - -- - - --- -- - 'rcder_Rnni Curp1111141cumh 01,02,03) tPum 241u aC q+f lira; 9Ua/. Rh!) 1998 -- - a:pi a� -- -- [Passe - - aFaN+ Passim - dPasJ �NCWUI 12110U4.Begim711I1996=:Frequmcy:_Q +-Mar Jun Sep Drc ilanComp:Single 1999 -- -• �Feil "'-�"r'e i':7 - PSss - - PA �Pa;" Subbasiu:,CPF16 �' 2000 •-- -• CPass-w -• •- fir• •- - -- - (Cuunty:Ulad�Regiun:.FRU_ -PF: NA ..Special' 2001 - - Pass -- --- cPa_. srs --- ePass� - NRlFaild=7 -- CPa re7Q10; 812.5='^ 1WCI%I:hIA Order.. 2002 - -- Pas`•. ` --- -- zp."— --- ` Vopak Terminal Wilmington Perm 24hr LC50 ac moral epic Md (grub) 1998 - -- -- -- >100 - -- - - -- -- -- NCW731721M1 Begin:51112002 Frequency: A NonComp: 1999 -- -- - -- -100 - -- - - - -- -- County: New Hanover Region: WIRO Subbasin: CPF17 2000 -- -- -- -- - - -- -- 1100 -- - IT: NA special 2001 _- - >700 -- -- -• -- _- -- --- -- 7QIO: TIDAL IWC(%)-NA 4r4er: 2002 - - - - -- -- - W.P. Mallard and Company -Durham Perm chr lam: 90°/. (grab) 1998 -- -- -• -- -- - - - -- -- - - NCUU86721NOOI Bepn:21112000 Frequency: Q )an Apr Jul Oct + NonC'omp:Single 1999 -- -- -- - - -- -- - - - - -- County- Durham Region: RICO Subbasin: NEU01 2000 --- -- -- N -• - N- PF; 0 014 Special 200t N - -- N _- _- N --- __ N -,- 7QIU:0.0 IWC(%I:IOO Oran: 2002 N - - N -- - N Y Pre 1998 Data Available LEGEND: PERM = Permit Requirement LET =Administrative Letter - Target Frequency - Monitoring rrequrncy: Q- Quanerly; M- NiondAy: BM- It irnonlhly; SA- Semiannually; A. Annually; O%VD- Only when discharging; D- Discontinued monitoring requirement Begin = First month required 7Q10 = Receiving stream low Ilow criterion (cl's) +- quarterly monitoring increases to monthly upon luilure or NR Months that tcsling must occur - ea. )an, Apr. )ul, Oct NonComp = Cumnt Compliance Requirement PF = Permitted Ilow. (NJC)D) IWC% -Insimarrr waste concentration P1F - Pasy Fail test AC =Acute CHR = Chronic Data Notation: f- Fathead Minnow; ' - Ceriodaphnia sp.; my - Mysid shrimp; ChV - Chronic value; P - Mortality ofslaled percentage at highest wuccnhatiun; at - Performed by DWQ Aquatic Tax Unit; In - Bad test Reporting Notation: --- = Data not required; NR - Not reported Facility Activity Status: T - Inactive, N - Newly lssued(To construct); H - Active but not discharging; t-Mare data available for month in question; • = ORC signatwe needed 51 ,/, , dI /z,� (905 lr�o� 23, I Ib / V I �(/1'�t (� i'a�yc..r... J s-cc,• T£� zoo ���� 9 ' yy f�� i� Danaher Controls 2100 W. Broad Street Elizabethtown, NC 28337 Telephone 910,862.2511 Fax 910.862.5400 May 4, 2001 Ms. Vaiery Stephens N. C. D. Environment & Natural Resources — Water Quality Section Point Sources Branch 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 RE: NPDES Application For Permit Renewal NPDES Permit NC 0001 121 Veeder-Root of North Carolina, Inc. Elizabethtown, North Carolina 28337 Dear Ms. Stephens: Enclosed please find (1) original and (2) copies of our NPDES Permit Renewal Application. Please contact me if you should have any questions. Sincerely, td M, Martin Facilities Engineer Enclosures: 1 worldwide Brands: yeeder-Root Dynapar Eagle Signal 7. Supplemental Documentation NPDES Permit NC0001121 Veeder-Root of North Carolina, Inc. Elizabethtown, North Carolina April 30, 2001 Present Operating Status Veeder-Root of North Carolina, Inc. operates a manufacturing facility in Elizabethtown, North Carolina (see Figure 1). The facility manufactures counters for flow meters and odometers, timers and relays, and voting machines and in the process generates wastes that are treated on -site. The effluent is discharged to the Cape Fear River under a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit NC0001121. Veeder-Root operates four outfalls (see Figure 2) under its NPDES permit (NC0001 121). These outfalls consist of: 001 wastewater treatment plant effluent, permitted for 0.17 MGD 002 noncontact cooling water, permitted for 0.152 MGD 003 treated ground water, permitted for 0.152 MGD 004 combined discharges from Outfalls 001, 002, and 003 1.1 Outfa11001 Wastewater Treatment Process Veeder-Root began operations in January 21, 1966. As a part of its electroplating and coatings operations. Veeder-Root produces wastewater, which is classified as hazardous waste due to the presence of chromium and cyanide. A wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) located behind the manufacturing facility treats these chromium and cyanide solutions. The chromium solutions are treated in batch treatment tanks with concentrated sulfuric acid and sodium bisulfite to transform the chromium from its hexavalent form to the trivalent form. The cyanide solutions are treated in batch treatment tanks with caustic soda and sodium hypochlorite, resulting in a solution with an approximate pH of 13 during cyanide destruction. The solutions are adjusted to a pH of 8.3 to 8.8, and treated with sodium bisulfite to dechlorinate the water. A flocculant (CP-32, aluminum chloride solution) is added to the chromium and cyanide batch tanks, mixed, and then allowed to settle for 24-hours before the effluent is pumped off to the clarifier. The sludges are pumped to a sludge holding tank and eventually are dewatered with a plate filter press. The effluent is discharged to the Cape Fear River under a NPDES permit (NC000i 121). The sludges are classified as a hazardous waste and are shipped to a licensed secure hazardous waste landfill. The cyanide tanks are 54 feet long by 24 feet wide by 12 feet deep in ground (37,500-gallon tanks). The chrome tanks are 24 feet long by 24 feet wide by 12 feet deep in ground (15,000-gallon tanks). The clarifier is an in ground tank 38 feet by 32 feet by 12 feet deep. The wet well is approximately 20 feet long by 8 feet wide by 12 feet deep with a 5,000-gallon treatment capacity. The metal hydroxide sludge tank is an aboveground steel tank 10.5 feet in diameter by 15.67 feet high. The clarifier capacity is 85,000 gallons. The calculated residence time for a single discharge from the wet well (capacity of 5,000 gallons) is 17 hours, from the chrome tank (capacity of 15,000 gallons) is 5.67 hours, and from the cyanide tank (capacity of 37,500 gallons) is 2.27 hours. 7-1 NPDES Permit NC0001121 Renewal Application Veeder-Root of North Carolina, Inc. Elizabethtown, North Carolina P.Needer-Root/01900/Reports/01149 April 30, 2001 Wastewater treatment sludges accumulates in the bottom of four batch treatment tanks and in the clarifier. As of 1985, a JWI filter press and sludge drying process was installed to reduce the volume of the sludge produced by the wastewater treatment processes. Since 1985 the sludges have been shipped off -site to Laidlaw Environmental Services (now Safety-Meen Corporation) for disposal. 1.2 Outfall 002 Noncontact Cooling water Outfall 002 consists of noncontact cooling water used in the plastic molding machines. The source of the water is potable water from the Town of Elizabethtown. The water moves through journals (passageways) in the molding machines and out to a sump behind the plant (see Figure 2). The water is one-time pass through (not recirculated). 1.3 Outfall 003 Ground Water Rernediation System In January 1990, a ground water treatment system became operational for a volatile organic compound (VOCs) plume associated with the sludge drying beds. The treatment system was designed to treat 75 to 90 gallons of water per minute. Ground water is extracted from three 90-foot deep wells, CW-I, CW-2, and CW-3, and pumped into a 2,500-gallon aeration treatment tank. The tank is 12-feet tall and 6-feet in outer diameter and is constructed of 304 stainless steel. An oil -less regenerative blower supplies approximately 50 SCFM of air into the tank through an injection system on the tank bottom. The aeration of the ground water is used to both remove volatile organic compounds and mix the caustic soda used to adjust the pH of the water. The treated ground water is then discharged through a continuous pH and flow monitoring outlet into the drain from the plant's WWTP to the Cape Fear River through Veeder- Root`s NPDES permit. The contaminant plume investigation determined that the plume consisted of 1,2-dichlorobenzene, I,1- dichloroethene (i,l-DCE), tetrachloroethene (PCE), toluene, and trichloroethene (TCE). The concentrations for the total VOCs detected ranged from 5.3 mg/L to less than 5 µg/L,. 7-2 CLAl✓yrt�P, Aeration Tank Cround'Water Re- mediation E OutfaE1003 Outfall001 Ofk Duncklee & Dunham, P. C. Environmental Consultants Arahor I?raVing Date bat 6/5j200( fob Na Repitiarr Figrar Scide 01900 0 1 As Shown TnN� (IG�cco Gir �-`� iE! I� j✓G ;c f-l.lsr'.u: r-- C/� C6OC-1-1 _. irt/e Waste Water Treatmtmt Plant L:rlc+ut Pmjecl Veeder-Root Carnpanv of North Carolina Bladcn County. North Carolina —' Noncon(ad cooling Water veEoe11--moor Outfall002 FACILITY 1: FAaKtA;' 11- I OutfallOw Olttf.111003 t : L i��'" — [ Rcmediated G1•oim(l %tci• i li1d I 00 cl11L. �J Outtnll00i 71\\ \ \\\\\ Cam\ Waste Wattt- ��j � ,,�' Treatment Plant Pa rc $4, IiJ c, ' 77 4 Cl L'iLC/1//11//11.f1i/1111u1L.LL.LLL1 1 14 ttoJt.Lr i z' .ti "J-- It,, o ,"YO 'ZOO :fool door Wli IFTJ Duncklee & Dunham, P.C. Environmental Consultants mi Urbor Darwin, upvmrr Dar Tille \I'U13S (lusfall. bd( 0]900-? lae G-i-00 !� Na. IZ,riliotf Fr use Solk Pr�li',7 Noah [:ar,dina i11a1Sltl G•5•(lll _ I" - ,isil f�liiattcrl�tuu•tZ, 3vc,rth casoblta Urbor Darwin, upvmrr Dar Tille \I'U13S (lusfall. bd( 0]900-? lae G-i-00 !� Na. IZ,riliotf Fr use Solk Pr�li',7 Noah [:ar,dina i11a1Sltl G•5•(lll _ I" - ,isil f�liiattcrl�tuu•tZ, 3vc,rth casoblta NPDES Permit NC0001 121 Renewal Application Veeder-Root of North Carolina, Inc. Elizabethtown, North Carolina P:Needer-Rootl01900/Reports{01 149 April 30, 2001 2 Potential Facility Changes There are no planned expansions or upgrades for the Veeder-Root W WTP. The history of the manufacturing operation for the last five years was reviewed to determine what potential changes could be expected for the next five years. Over the last five years the amount of material being plated and coated by Veeder-Root had decreased because they were no longer plating and coating parts for their Altoona plant. The Elizabethtown plant phased out the plating and coating of parts for their Altoona plant in 1996. In 2000, Veeder-Root revised it treatment chemicals used in the cyanide and chromium treatment tanks. This change in chemicals have resulted in better cyanide and metals removal. There should be no required changes in W WTP chemicals over the next five years_ The only change that may occur over the next five years is reduction in the amount of material being plated and coated. 7-3 Clarifier Wet Well 41-- (85,000-gallons, receives (5.000-gallons, clear water from wet well) effluent from Chromium/Cyanide treatment tanks) OutfOl 001 Discharge Chrome Treatment Tanks (2 15,500-gallon tanks, batch treatment) I. Start mixer in tank to be treated and adjust pH to 1.5 or below with sulfuric acid 2. Add sodium bisultite until all hexavalent chromium is converted to trivalent chromium 3. Mix tank for 45 minutes to one hour until all chromium is converted. 4 With mixer running adjust pH to 6 5 with caustic n o3�G 3 PUMP an was t s U ge rom treatment tank to the sludge holding tank. City Water Makeup, mixing Plating/Coating Dep of plating/coating Wastewater chemicals) (Rinse/floor/ Sties tank cleaning) AL — Sludge Holding Tan Cyanide Treatment Tanks (10,000-gallons, receive (2 37,500-gallon tanks, sludge from clarifier, batch treatment) cyanide, and chromium f. Start mixer in tank to be treated and adjust pH to treatment tanks) 12 or above with caustic soda and mix for about one hour. Outfall 001 Process Waters Veeder-Root of North Carolina, Inc. NC 0001121 soda. 5. Add CP32 (floeeulant) while maintaining a pH of 6.5. Mix approximately 10 minutes. 6. Cutoffmixer and allow sludge in tank to form and settle at least 24 hours. 7. After sludge has settled, allow clear effluent to flow to acid and alkaline pump station (wet well). Pump clear efllucm from pump station to clarifier. 8. After clear effluent is removed, turn on sludge d I I d f (Receives sludge from 3. Mix tank for 45 minutes to one hour before holding tank) checking to see if all cyanide is destroyed. 4. With mixer running, adjust pH to 8.3 to $.B with sulfuric acid. Sludge Rollof'f 5. Add CP32 (locculant) while maintaining a pH of (Receives sludge 8.3 to 8.8. Mix approximately 20 minutes. from filter press) 6. Cutoff mixer and allow sludge in tank to form and settle at feast 24 hours. 7. After sludge has settled, allow clear effluent to flow to acid and alkaline pump station (wet well). Pump clear effluent from pump station to clarifier. 8 Alter clear effluent is removed, turn on sludge pump and wash sludge from treatment tank to the sludge holding tank. Legend » Clear Effluent ::tea Cloudy Effluent MW Sludge Outfall 002 Noncontact Cooling Water Veeder-Root of North Carolina, Inc. NC 0001121 Outfall 002 Discharge O City Water 002 Metering Station 4 Molding Machines is (Flow through. noncontact. cooling water) Outfall 003 Remediated Ground Water Veeder-Root of North Carolina, Inc. NC 0001121 0 u tfal 1003 Discharge / Extracted Ground Water Aeration Tank q (70-90 GPM of VOC (2,500-gallon) contaminated ground water. _ - 3 90-foot extraction wells) Oil -less Regenerative Blower (50 SCFM of ambient air) Veeder-Root of North Carolina, Inc. / `. NPDES Permit No. NC0001121 V UNITED STATES_- Y DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR..V\ GEOLOGICAL SURVEYPei ` inCLStnai `Haste Dismal _ �1� __ — �. .fit . {. - -� - '' - � -t_ -t. Z_i r�f-'r✓ riei' _ � ��.. :\ -:_ Site 74 -`- Elizabethtsiun ,w I -Eliza Jeff 77 .. .�_ - -- - F]irabethtotivn �• � i i r ' iza126 bethtown . -'�' �� 4 - .• -. _ -';`..'`_- ' ''� ,r' � earn r.� _ '' Veeder-Root of North Carolina, Inc. NPDES Permit No. NC0001121 May 2, 2001 Production Data for Veeder-Root of North Carolina, Inc. Elizabethtown, North Carolina The attached production data for the last three years have been attached. The production data is associated with the plating and coating operation at Elizabethtown facility. Veeder-Root of North Carolina, Inc. NPDES Permit No. NC0001121 May 2.2001 Priority Pollution Analysis for Veeder-Root of North Carolina, Inc. Elizabethtown, North Carolina The Priority Pollution Analysis for Outfall 004 was collected on April 25, 2001. As soon as the analytical results are received, Veeder-Root of North Carolina, Inc. will summit three copies to go along the permit renewal application. Sludge Management Plan NPDES Permit NCO001121 Veeder-Root of North Carolina, Inc. Elizabethtown, North Carolina April 30, 2001 Source of Sludges Wastewater treatment sludges accumulates in the bottom of four batch treatment tanks and in the clarifier. As of 1985, a JWI filter press and sludge drying process was installed to reduce the volume of the sludge produced by the wastewater treatment processes. Since 1985 the sludges have been shipped off -site to Laidlaw Environmental Services (now Safety-Kleen Corporation) for disposal. Sludges are formed during the chromium treatment process by the following procedure: I. Start mixer in tank to be treated and adjust pH to 1.5 or below with sulfuric acid 2. Add sodium bisulfte until all hexavalent chromium is converted to trivalent chromium 3. Mix tank for 45 minutes to one hour until all chromium is converted. 4. With mixer running, adjust pH to 6.5 with caustic soda. 5. Add CP32 (flocculant) while maintaining a pH of 6.5. Mix approximately 10 minutes. 6. Cutoff mixer and allow sludge in tank to form and settle at least 24 hours. 7. After sludge has settled, allow clear effluent to flow to acid and alkaline pump station (wet well). Pump clear effluent from pump station to clarifier. S. After clear effluent is removed, turn on sludge pump and wash sludge from treatment tank to the sludge holding tank. Sludges are formed during the cyanide treatment process by the following procedure: 1. Start mixer in tank to be treated and adjust pH to 12 or above with caustic soda and mix for about one hour. 2. Add sodium hypochlorite while maintaining a pH of I I or higher until all cyanide is destroyed. 3. Mir tank for 45 minutes to one hour before checking to see if all cyanide is destroyed. 4. With mixer running, adjust pH to 8.3 to 8.8 with sulfuric acid. 5. Add CP32 (flocculant) while maintaining a pH of 8.3 to 8.8. Mix approximately 20 minutes. 6. Cutoff mixer and allow sludge in tank to form and settle at least 24 hours. 7. After sludge has settled, allow clear effluent to flow to acid and alkaline pump station (wet well). Pump clear effluent from pump station to clarifier. 8. After clear effluent is removed, turn on sludge pump and wash sludge from treatment tank to the sludge holding tank. Sludge Management Plan for Permit NC0001 121 Veeder-Root of North Carolina, Inc. Elizabethtown, North Carolina P:Needer-Root/01900/Reports/01 149 April 30, 2001 2 Accumulation of Sludges The sludges stored in the sludge holding tank are pumped to the JWI filter press where they are consolidated under pressure to a dryer filter cake. The filter cake is placed in a rolloff in the small building east of the sludge holding tank. Once a quarter, Safety-Kleen picks up the rolloff and transports it to their Pinewood, South Carolina facility where it is mixed with other hazardous waste and then shipped by rail to one of their licensed hazardous waste landfills. Effluent from the filter press goes back to the cyanide tank until the effluent runs clear; then the effluent can be directed to the wet well. NPDES Monitoring Veeder-Root monitors the effluent through Outfall 004 weekly by sampling for total suspended solids as an indicator for potential sludge releases. The WWTP operator checks the clarifier effluent throughout the periods when a treatment tank is being discharged to visual insure that no sludges are being released. I certify that I am familiar with the information contained in the plan and that to the best of my knowledge and belief such information is true, complete, and accurate. _ p Lb 1�t2. i l �•I �-�c.. l Ut TI ES C� Printed Name of Person Signing Title Signature of Applicant or Authorized Agent Date Plan Signed WDanaher Controls 2100 W. Broad Street Elizabethtown, NC 26337 Telephone 910.862.2511 Fax 910.862.5400 May 30, 2001 Ms. Valery Stephens North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Water Quality Section Point Sources Branch 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Dear Ms. Stephens: Enclosed are two packets of information to respond to Section 7 - Supplemental Documentation. Documentation on the production data is one packet and the priority pollutant analysis analytical report is the second packet. Please attach the original and two copies to the May 4, 2001 Application for permit Renewal that we Submitted to you. I certify that I am familiar with the information and that to the best of my knowledge and belief such information is true, complete and accurate. Thank you and call me if you have any questions or comment (910.862.5410 direct). II/z/7& David M. Martin Facilities Engineer Enclosures: (2) &�4� 1 l/'oj 1 Worldwide Brands: Reeder -Root Dyaapar Eagle 9na1 7 Supplemental Data Production Data Veeder-Root manufactures many products at the facility including counters for flow meters and odometers, timers and relays, and voting machines. However, not all the products result in wastewater generation that requires treatment at the wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). Rather than try to correlate the number of counters, timers, relays, or voting machines to the production of wastewater, Veeder-Root has looked at the raw chemical purchases for the plating and coating department. The plating and coating department is the primary source of wastewater treated at the W WTP. Eight chemicals were selected to track the generation of wastewater during the production of finished goods. Other chemicals are used such as sulfitric acid, nitric acid, etc, but their volume used is dependent on the usage of the eight selected chemicals. These chemicals are: • Actane 342 • Chromium • Iridite • Nickel Sulfate • Soap Cleaner • Sodium Cyanide • Zinc • Zinc Brightener Table I is a summary of the usage of these chemicals from 1995 through 2000. Figure 1 shows the use of Iridite and zinc brightener. As can be seen in Table 1 and Figure 1, the usage of these chemicals have been declining frorn 1995 through 2000. Figure 2 shows the usage of Actane 342 and soap cleaner. The amount of Actane 342 and soap cleaner has been declining since 1995. Figure 3 shows a similar decline in the usage of chromium, nickel sulfate, and sodium cyanide. The spikes in the plots for Iridite (1997), nickel sulfate (1997), and Actane 342 (1997) represent volume purchases for cost savings and not actual usage. The data shown confirms that Veeder-Root is reducing the volume of plating and coating and thereby reducing the volume of wastewater to be treated and discharged through Outfall 001. PIVeeder-Root/019001Reportsl0I 149-Production Data 3,000 2,500 M V 'E 1,500 U 0 c c 1,000 i� t7 500 0 1 Veeder-Root of North Carolina, Inc. Permit No. NC0001211 Figure I Use of Production Chemicals in Plating/Coating Department 1 V'U 1yvb 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Years it iui►u T1-mt: 6rigntener--t_inear (tridite) --Linear (Zinc Brightener) j P:Needer-Root/01900/Excel/Plating Material Purchases 14,000 12,000 d 10,000 w s 0 8,000 E d V 6,000 0 y t: 4 4,000 2,000 0 15Ult Veeder-Root of North Carolina, Inc. Permit No. NC0001211 , Figure 2 Use of Production Chemicals in Plating/Coating Department iyao 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 Years --Soap Cleaner x Actane 342 —Linear (Actane 342) —Linear (Soap Cleaner) . P:/Veeder-Root/01900/Excel/Plating Material Purchases 2,5C 2,OC E d U p 1,00 C C O a 0 -I- 1994 Veeder-Root of North Carolina; Inc. Permit No. NC0001211 , Figure 3 Use of Production Chemicals in Plating/Coating Department 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 Years —0 Chromium Na Cyanide ----A— Ni Sulfate —)4—Zinc ---Linear (Ni Sulfate) ---Linear (Na Cyanide) ----Linear (Chromium) —Linear (7inc1 P:/Veeder-Root/01900/Excel/Plating Material Purchases 2000 2001 Re: Veeder' Root NC0001121 Subject: Re: Veeder Root NCOOO1121 Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 10:37:30 -0400 From: Charles Weaver <charles_weaver@ncmail.net> To: Kristie Robeson<kristie_robeson@h2o.enr.state. nc.us> Kristie, no name change material has appeared in my office. I'll send you a copy of whatever I get, if I get anything. Sorry I didn't get back to you sooner - I had accumulated 30+ name change requests and had to sort though them all before I could respond to your query. CHW 1 of 1 1/24/00 11:10 AM