20020419 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20020320

F WATF
?D?O RQG Michael F. Easley
Governor
CO r William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
j __q Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, PE, Director
Division of Water Quality
September 27, 2002
(Replaces the Approval Issued on July 2, 2002)
DWQ Project # 02-0419
(Previously Approved under 01-0373)
Wake County
City of Raleigh
c/o: Mr. J. Russell Allen, City Manager
222 West Hargett Street k
Raleigh, NC 27602
Subject Property: Johnsdale Road Sanitary Sewer Extension, Raleigh, NC
Dewberry & Davis Project No. 00013
Unnamed tributary stream of Perry Creek [03-04-02; 27-25-(2); C NSW]
APPROVAL of Authorization Certificate per the Neuse River Buffer Protection Rules (15A NCAC 213 .0233) with
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Dear Mr. Russell:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to impact 40 feet of perennial
stream and 10,995 square feet of riparian buffers to install the proposed sewer system as described within your
application dated March 19, 2002 and additional information dated May 21, 2002. After reviewing your application, we
have determined that this fill is covered by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) General Water Quality Certification
Number 3374. This Certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit No. 12-when issued by the US Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE). This letter shall also act as your approved Authorization Certificate for impacts to the protected
Neuse River Buffers as required under 15A NCAC 2B.0233(8). In addition, you should get or otherwise comply with any
other federal, state and local requirements before you go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Erosion and
Sediment Control Permit, Water Supply and Non-Discharge. Also, this approval will expire when the accompanying 404
permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification. This approval replaces the approval issued on
July 2, 2002.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application except as modified below. If
you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold,
the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with
all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of wetland or 150 feet stream,
compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). For this approval to be valid, you
must follow the conditions listed in the DWQ General Water Quality Certification No. 3374 and any conditions listed below.
Conditions:
You are required to mitigate for impacts to the protected riparian buffers. The required area of mitigation to
compensate for impacts to the protected riparian buffers is 20,496 square feet as required under this Authorization
Certificate and 15A NCAC 2B .0233. We understand that you wish to make a payment into the Riparian Buffer
Restoration Fund administered by the NC Wetlands Restoration Program (WRP) to meet this mitigation requirement.
This has been determined by the DWQ to be a suitable method to meet the mitigation requirement. In accordance
with 15A NCAC 2B .0242, this contribution will satisfy our compensatory mitigation requirements under 15A NCAC 213
.0233(9)(C). Until the WRP receives and clears your check (made payable to: DENR - Wetlands Restoration
Program Office), no impacts specified in this Authorization Certificate shall occur. Mr. Ron Ferrell should be
contacted at [phone] if you have any questions concerning payment into the WRP. As per your request
dated July 31, 2002, you have until November 1, 2002 to make this payment. For accounting purposes, this
Authorization Certificate authorizes payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund to compensate for 20,496 ftz of
required riparian buffer mitigation for impacts to 6,832 fe of protected riparian buffers; 03-04-02 river and subbasin.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/
Page 2 of 2
2. The sewer system shall comply with the Non-Discharge Rules (15A NCAC 21-1.0200).
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act and the Neuse
Buffer Rules. If you have any questions, please telephone Mr. John Dorney at [phone].
Sincerely,
I Klimek, PE
D Q, Director
Attachments: DWQ General Water Quality Certification No. 3374 (sent previously)
Certificate of Completion (sent previously)
WRP Notification Form (sent previously)
Cc: Steve Mitchell, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
Joe Langston, Dewberry & Davis, Inc., 5505 Creedmoor Rd., Suite 150, Raleigh, NC 27612-6352
Dale Crisp, PE, Raleigh Public Utilities Director, 222 West Hargett St., Raleigh, NC 27602
File copy
Central Files
DWQ 020419
September 27, 2002
Dewberry & Davis, Inc.
5505 Creedmoor Road • Raleigh, NC 27612
919-881-9939 Fax [phone] www.dewberrycom
July 31, 2002
Mr. John Dorney
NC Division of Water Quality
2321,Grabtree Blvd., Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27607
?e ???? d Irf ?`
t77r Sfr?'r;?R?
Reference: City of Raleigh
Johnsdale Sanitary Sewer Extension
DWQ Project # 02-0419
Dewberry & Davis, Inc. Project Number 00013
Dear Mr. Dorney:
ENGINEERS-PLANNERS-SURVEYORS
The City is in receipt of the July 2, 2002 DWQ approval of the Johnsdale Road Sanitary Sewer
Extension project in Raleigh. We appreciate the assistance the Division has provided with this
project to date.
Condition 1 requires the City to compensate for impacts to the protected riparian buffers within one
month.
The City requests a time extension for making payment to the WRP. The City will require at least
two months to make the payment depending on when the invoice is received. The City will request
the invoice within 30 days of today. The City Council must act on the request before funds can be
assigned to the project.
The City will not begin construction on the project or perform any other work to impact the
protected buffers until the payment to WRP is made.
We look forward to receiving your approval of this extension and moving forward with this
important project for the City.
Sincerely
DEWBERRY & DAVIS, INC.
C'/M (s C?____
Christopher H. Brown, P.E.
Senior Associate
c: Dale Crisp, P.E., City of Raleigh
Jack Moyer, City of Raleigh
Ron Ferrell, WRP
Joe Langston, P.E., Dewberry & Davis, Inc.
0:\PROJECTS\00013.ws\Johnsdale\Domey July 30, 2002.doc
Dewberry
MW
Dewberry & Davis LLC • Dewberry Design Group Incorporated • Dewberry & Davis, Inc. • DewberryGoodkind, Inc. • TOLK, Inc.
s OF w A TF9 Michael F. Easley
`Ot QG Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, PE, Director
Division of Water Quality
July 2, 2002
City of Raleigh
c/o: Mr. J. Russell Allen, City Manager
222 West Hargett Street
Raleigh, NC 27602
DWO Project # 02-0419
(Previously Approved under 01-0373)
Wake County
Subject Property: Johnsdale Road Sanitary Sewer Extension, Raleigh, NC
Dewberry & Davis Project No. 00013
Unnamed tributary stream of Perry Creek [03-04-02; 27-25-(2); C NSW]
APPROVAL of Authorization Certificate per the Neuse River Buffer Protection Rules (15A NCAC 213.0233) with
ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS
Dear Mr. Russell:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions and those listed below, to impact 40 feet of perennial
stream and 10,995 square feet of riparian buffers to install the proposed sewer system as described within your
application dated March 19, 2002 and additional information dated May 21, 2002. After reviewing your application, we
have determined that this fill is covered by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) General Water Quality Certification
Number 3374. This Certification allows you to use Nationwide Permit No. 12 when issued by the US Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE). This letter shall also act as your approved Authorization Certificate for impacts to the protected
Neuse River Buffers as required under 15A NCAC 2B.0233(8). In addition, you should get or otherwise comply with any
other federal, state and local requirements before you. go ahead with your project including (but not limited to) Erosion and
Sediment Control Permit, Water Supply and Non-Discharge. Also, this approval will expire when the accompanying 404
permit expires unless otherwise specified in the General Certification.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you described in your application except as modified below. If
you change your project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold,
the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with
all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of wetland or 150 feet stream,
compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H .0506 (h). For this approval to be valid, you
must follow the conditions listed in the DWQ General Water Quality Certification No. 3374 and any conditions listed below.
Conditions:
You are required to mitigate for impacts to the protected riparian buffers. The required area of mitigation to
compensate for impacts to the protected riparian buffers is 20,496 square feet as required under this Authorization
Certificate and 15A NCAC 26 .0233. We understand that you wish to make a payment into the Riparian Buffer
Restoration Fund administered by the NC Wetlands Restoration Program (WRP) to meet this mitigation requirement.
This has been determined by the DWQ to be a suitable method to meet the mitigation requirement. In accordance
with 15A NCAC 2B.0242, this contribution will satisfy our compensatory mitigation requirements under 15A NCAC 2B
.0233(9)(C). Until the WRP receives and clears your check (made payable to: DENR - Wetlands Restoration
Program Office), no impacts specified in this Authorization Certificate shall occur. Mr. Ron Ferrell should be
contacted at [phone] if you have any questions concerning payment into the WRP. You have one month from
the date of this approval to make this payment. For accounting purposes, this Authorization Certificate
authorizes payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund to compensate for 20.496 ft2 of required
riparian buffer mitigation for impacts to 6,832 ft2 of protected riparian buffers; 03-04-02 river and subbasin.
2. The sewer system shall comply with the Non-Discharge Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0200).
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), hftp://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands/
Page 2 of 2
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act and the Neuse
Buffer Rules. If you have any questions, please telephone Mr. John Dorney at [phone].
Sincerely,
. b7
Attachments: DWQ General Water Quality
Certificate of Completion
WRP Notification Form
No. 3374
Cc: Steve Mitchell, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
Joe Langston, Dewberry & Davis, Inc., 5505 Creedmoor Rd., Suite 150, Raleigh, NC 27612-6352
Dale Crisp, PE, Raleigh Public Utilities Director, 222 West Hargett St., Raleigh, NC 27602
File copy
Central Files
DWQ 020419
July 2, 2002
0F WATER Michael F. Easley
OCR QG Governor
Uj 7 William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
] Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Authorization Certificate
SUMMARY OF PERMITTED IMPACTS AND MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2B .0233, the City of Raleigh has permission as outlined below and within the
attached authorization certificate to impact buffers for the purpose(s) of constructing the Johnsdale Road Sanitary
Sewer Extension. All activities associated with these authorized impacts must be conducted with the conditions listed
in the attached authorization certificate. THIS AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATE IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE
ATTACHMENTS.
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION REQUIREMENT WETLAND RESTORATION PROGRAM (WRP)
DWQ Project No. 020419
APPROVAL DATE: July 2, 2002
LOCATION: Raleigh
COUNTY: Wake
BAS I N/SUB BASIN : 03-04-02
STREAM INDEX NO.: 27-25-(2)
As required by 15A NCAC 2B .0233 and the conditions of the authorization certificate, you are required to
compensate for the above impacts through the restoration or enhancement of buffers as outlined below prior to
conducting any activities that impact or degrade the waters of the state.
20,496 square feet of riparian buffers
One of the options you have available to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements is through the payment
of a fee to the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund per 15A NCAC 213 .0242. If you choose this option, please sign this form
and mail it to the WRP at the address listed below. An invoice for the appropriate amount of payment will be sent to you
upon receipt of this form. PLEASE NOTE, THE ABOVE IMPACTS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL YOU HAVE
RECEIVED NOTIFICATION THAT YOUR PAYMENT HAS BEEN PROCESSED BY THE WRP.
Signature
WETLANDS RESTORATION PROGRAM (WRP)
NC DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
1619 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1619
[phone]
Date
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.ne.us/newetlands/
QF WA TF? Michael F. Easley
O? pG Governor
vj 7 William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
p Y Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
DWQ Project No.: 02-0419 County: Wake
Applicant: City of Raleigh
Project Name: Johnsdale Road Sanitary Sewer Extension
Date of Issuance of 401 Water Quality Certification: July 2, 2002
Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable Buffer Rules, and any
subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return this certificate to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina
Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.This form may be returned to DWQ by the
applicant, the applicant's authorized agent, or the project engineer.It is not necessary to send.certificates from all of these.
Applicant's Certification:
I, , hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used
in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and
intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting
materials.
Signature: Date:
Agent's Certification:
hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was used
in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance and
intent of the 401 Water Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other supporting
materials.
Signature: Date:
If this project was designed by a Certified Professional:
as a duly registered Professional (i.e., Engineer, Landscape
Architect, Surveyor, ect.) in the State of North Carolina, having been authorized to observe (periodically, weekly, full time)
the construction of the project, for the Permittee hereby state that, to the best of my abilities, due care and diligence was
used in the observation of the construction such that the construction was observed to be built within substantial compliance
and intent of the 401 Water-Quality Certification and Buffer Rules, the approved plans and specifications, and other
supporting materials.
Signature Registration No.
Date
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetiands/
Re: Johnsdale Road Sanitary Sewer Extension
Subject: Re: Johnsdale Road Sanitary Sewer Extension
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 13:32:54 -0500
From: Steve Mitchell <[e-mail]>
To: Bob Zarzecki <bob.zarzecki @ncmail.net>
CC: "[e-mail]"' <[e-mail]>
THe sewer alignment HAS to be at least 10 feet from the stream. I informed Dale that square footage
mitigation would be required for ALL of the impacts within the 50 foot buffer. NO OTHER WAY.
Bob Zarzecki wrote:
Mitchell & JD:
I assume that neither of you made it to this meeting. John placed Mr. Jackson's letter in my box to
"handle". I thought that we were waiting on a revised realignment from their 010373 approval. It turns
out that one was received and sent to the RRO on 3/21/02 (020419). The previously approved 010373
plan has less impacts to buffers but more impact to Mr. Jackson's property. The 020419 plan has more
impacts to buffers but less impact to Mr. Jackson's property. Given the existing properties and
structures, I'm willing to recommend the approval of the 020419 plan with the condition of buffer
mitigation for all Zone 1 parallel impacts. Look over plans and see if you agree. Please be aware that
the 020419 plan has impacts within 10 feet of the creek. If we issue this are we doing so in conflict with
the 15A NCAC 02H .0219 reps? These regs require at least a 10 foot separation from Class C waters.
Mitchell: Please provide comments in Filemaker or respond to this email.
JD: I've placed these in your box. Please review and 2nd.
- Bob
"Langston, Joe" wrote:
Mr. Dorney and Mr. Mitchell:
We have scheduled a community meeting (per the E-mails last week) for the above referenced project for
Wednesday, March 27th, at3:00 P.M. in the City Council Conference Room (2nd floor of municipal building, near
Council Chambers).We would be grateful, due to the sensitive nature of the sanitary sewer alignment, if one of
you could attend the meeting and give your input.
Please call our office if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Joe Langston, P.E.
n i
Dewberry & Davis, Inc.
???02 ??L 60 CyA y 1
1 of 1 4/2/02 2:08 PIN
n
a>
U
U
a?
U
a>
V
N
O
fA N
W ? CIO
n
cn O U
4-
aa a>
R9,@ oz
)
CO
O Cl
a al U
'=3O O N ?
o v cz Q
3??oA
O, p.
C?HQ1A=
C."
b?A
O
-r1 v • '?
G >
-0 O m m
•ri N '?
3 0 ^
? u C7
vaSS?^
m O N
0 a) 0-
04 U LS ^
O rl
S-1 •rl a) --
04 m .I~ O'?
?a
4-3
0) (n N
t
Li J--7 J-)C)
-H U r
a) to O
O N
? •r1 ?
G U
•r-t ? ? FC
54 G O
a) 0 IS. F:?
3 N m LO
a) r-t
H -H
Q) J,
S4 cxd 3
o a)
^ 44 >.
v0 a)
rA 3 O
O +3 U
41 (d m
0) (a r-I
J, En
O a) r-1 U
44 N
4-1 O n
-q O
O R G 04
t ^
UNaa)
0
v [+ Ol
•n
O LYl a) = ri
a o
41
vu>s?
J- O •,A J-? N
m 41
a) 44
U U (d O r?
C v ?4 -1 U
r-I a) 'o -0 Z
04 44 'rq
00? Ln
J-J O H 0 H
.-1 U
a?"i >1 m .? m
as S•J Q) m
-4 a)
O k 'o r-I U
rJ O Ln r. r.
U) a ?
J•1
a) ? '? r-I U
0 0 3
m 0 w
-C? S4 0 G
?rlaa)ia
a) (6 '0 Z5
Ln Q)
.1-1 fJ1 r 14 a
•rl -4 (o H
f: G C4
J1 Q) •rt
.. a) a) 44 ?4
a) O _0 >1 CQ
Q U1 44 .? RS M I
Qi

n.

v q

? U

?n

ro {?

Q)
J_! G
U u
v
'r1 GZ
O
4
R u

G S
.H

u
RS U

N 'h
S-j O
t
^^j
41

? G G 'H

U 0
41 N v
-, U

41

3 0 0 4
u u N
aj m 3

S iQ
S
O
M
4 j
4J U il?- 0 M
-?j
Q) Q) Ln tt} 1 O ?-1 O R'1
u LC) Q) T 1 41
U H UN
u n O y al h G
H O LJ H 3 q 00 1 o
u N o G JJ G I JJ o tq
I ^I O c? ? RS O U1 I H N ?
Q) 'a
I RS N lY Q) 'H J! 'H ri I rtS S.," ,5, Ri
v tEi JJ ON Q) Ei u O O

01 o W W 'ri >S zf) v
Rf -i i Q) O JJ (0 Q 'H Q)
ri
O v ?y C4 v 1 41 Cl ? ? 44 Ell 1 O RS
?11 Q)
4--1 44 N U ,` .G H ! Q) U O C3 co "
O J? v o 3 C a H O r 1 °o fq G
3 H h JJ u) d+ rs U)
R
3 O ?+ ? N G U = rt Q M
0 0
G Q)
ro ?u R o v ?4 a I H J) h
Q) G Q) 10 v Z ? v U 04 o b) O L5 0 m

r-I l11 Q) v S? , 'H R 'H Q) - co
?1 R 'H G
(D I
;Ua as
0 U ?` q a?rn O
G E • • U Q1 H Q) ?-1 ^i ri i
G • • •Q
1 JJ 't1 Q) S„ 'H R$ dl I S-.i Q) O U
F-i
rl v ?{ v 0 RS N U
GL to E-4 (f) G = = n n n n n n n n n n n n n

A A A A A R /, A h n A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A
N
O
r
kn
4

Qj
10
4-4
O Q)
411
`? 41
Q)
?t
r-i
c ?
m •ti
ro ?
411
'L N
O
U
N
? O
H ?
Q2
'j F?
O
F O
W ?
O ?
U rte
?L' Q1
U 1
N N
'C Ql
N ?
Q ?4
Q
Q
b)
O ?
10
J O
?Jl
+? C11
U) 4J
!L >i
x o
U
U !-D
J --I
! N ?
rye ?' '.i
A A IN A A A A A A
A A A A A A A A A
r-
O
U
N
U
'C3
C
N
O
a
N W
NQt?
.n
oU°`
caz?
r.
C,
N
O
r
N
w
O
N
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: Steve Mitchell
Non-Discharge Branch WQ Supervisor:
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Johnsdale Road Sanitary Sewer Extension
Project Number 02 0419
Recvd From APP
County Wake
County2
Region Raleigh
Received Date 3/20/02 Recvd By Region
Project Type utility line
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
1? PT O N
27-25-(2) NSW ;0,402. 0.10 40.00
F__ F- F c
?? O 0, -312. F_ F_ 1?1
NBR P7_97,_
r r r
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y 0 N Did you request more info? 0 Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? 0 Y 0 N
Recommendation: 0 Issue 0 Issue/Coed 0 Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) Longitude (ddmmss)
Comments:
ZONE ONE IMPACTS Still disagree with statement that the current proposed al'gnemnt cause s the
least environmental damage, Movine the houses and driveways and workshops and keeping the
sewer fi feet away causes the least environmental damage. That being said, MITIGATE
MITIGATE< MITIGATE>
Crossing a 10 is not perpendicular. Is that included in the mitigation?

cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Sanitary Sewer Systems & GC 3374
Subject: Sanitary Sewer Systems & GC 3374
Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 09:16:18 -0400
From: Bob Zarzecki <[e-mail]>.
Organization: Division of Water Quality; 401 Certification Unit
To: John Dorney <[e-mail]>, John Hennessy <[e-mail]>,
Danny Smith <[e-mail]>, "Todd St. John" <[e-mail]>,
Dave Penrose <[e-mail]>,
"[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>,
Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>, "bob.zarzecki" <[e-mail]>,
"cynthia.vanderwiele" <[e-mail]>,
Beth Barnes <[e-mail]>, Larry Eaton <[e-mail]>,
Mike Horan <[e-mail]>
Wetlands Unit:
I'm reviewing a project that involves a sanitary sewer line proposed to
be installed parallel to a stream. In this case the stream is
classified as "C NSW". Our GC3374 requires that they keep the
construction corridor at least 10 feet from the stream when running
parallel. Non-Discharge rules, 15A NCAC 2H .0219 "Minimum Design
Requirements" (i) For sewer systems and sewer system extensions (2) (G)
minimum separations (vi) any other stream, lake or impoundment, require
that the sewer system (pipe, man-holes, etc.; not the construction
corridor) be kept 10 feet away (50 feet for WS-II, WS-III, B, SA, ORW,
HQW, or SB; & 100 feet for WS-I, or Class I or Class II impounded
reservoirs used as a source of drinking water). Please keep in mind
that these rules only apply to the actual pipe, man-holes, etc. and not
the construction corridor. Like with any regulation there are
exceptions that allow sewer systems to infringe within these minimum
separations. 2H .0219(xii) states; "Ferrous sewer pipe with joints
equivalent to water main standards, shall be used where these minimum
separations cannot be maintained. The minimum separation shall however
not be less than 25 feet from a private well or 50 feet from a public
water supply well."
I plan to put the project on hold because the RRO believes that the line
can be placed greater than 10 feet from the stream. I plan to place a
condition on any final approval that states that "The project shall
comply with 15A NCAC 2H .0219 (i) (2) (G) and all other State, Federal and
Local sewer system regulations." and cc: Mr. Kim Colson, DWQ
Non-discharging Permitting Unit to ensure that they use the ferrous
sewer pipe. I think this should be a standard condition for all sewer
systems that we approve within these minimum separations. Other minimum
separations and buffers apply that we should review any time we have a
401 Certification that involves waste not discharged to surface waters.
Cyndi & JD: We may want to change GC3374 the next go-around to address
this.
Todd: Please include the condition above within our list of conditions
(assuming that Cyndi or John don't disagree). Feel free to change the
wording if you don't like it.
- Bob
Bob Zarzecki
NC DENR/DWQ 401 Wetlands Certification Unit
919-733-9726
1 of 2 5/7/02 r
Re: Johnsdale Road Sewer Extension
Subject: Re: Johnsdale Road Sewer Extension
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 11:47:09 -0400
From: Bob Zarzecki <[e-mail]>
Organization: Division of Water Quality; 401 Certification Unit
To: "Langston, Joe" <[e-mail]>
CC: Steve Mitchell <steve.mitchelI@ncmai].net>
FieEeor?y
Joe:
We received your additional information yesterday (May 21st). Sorry about not contacting you sooner, I've
been out of the office until this morning. Thank you for the additional information and multiple photos.
We will send a copy of this information to Steve Mitchell of the RRO for his review. If he determines that
the project meets the "no practical alternatives" review, then we'll send out the approval letter as soon as
possible. The approval will most likely be conditioned with buffer mitigation (as proposed) and
compliance with non-discharge rules.
- Bob
"Langston, Joe" wrote:
Bob:
We are compiling all of the information you requested during our meeting (You, Chris Brown, and myself) we had
last Monday, May 13, 2002 at 10:00 AM for the above referenced project.We have additional photos, building
permit for shed, construction drawing showing topo around the stream channel, and cover letter.
How many copies of this information should we send to John Dorney? Seven copies of each?
Thanks for your help in this matter
Joe
Bob Zarzecki
NC DENR/DWQ 401 Wetlands Certification Unit
919-733-9726
1 of 1 5/22/02 11:47 AN
Dewberry & Davis, Inc.
ENGINEERS -PLANNERS -SURVEYORS
5505 Creedmoor Road • Raleigh, NC 27612
919-881-9939 Fax [phone] wwwdewberrycom
May 21, 2002
Mr. John Dorney
NC Division of Water Quality
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27607
Reference:

City of Raleigh
Johnsdale Sanitary Sewer Extension
DWQ Project# 02-0419
Dewberry & Davis, Inc. Project Number 00013
Dear Mr. Dorney:
Per you letter dated May 7, 2001 and per our meeting with Mr. Bob Zarzecki on May 13, 2002, we
are enclosing 7 copies each the following additional information:
• Preliminary construction drawing, including contours and spot shots along the proposed
construction corridor.
• Building permit for the workshop between manholes 30 and 40.
• Additional photographs of the area east of the workshop.
Below are our responses to the requested information listed in your May 7, 2002 correspondence.
We offer the following:
1. The proposed alignment of the sanitary sewer cannot be moved greater than 10 feet away
from the bank of the stream because of constructability issues. On the east side of
Manhole 60 there is an embankment to a driveway (6709 Johnsdale Road),
approximately 7 feet tall with approximately a 2:1 slope. If the proposed sewer route is
moved more to the east, the sewer construction would compromise the structural integrity
of the driveway's embankment. Additionally, the sewer would be closer to the
foundation of a house.
A portion of the proposed sewer between Manhole 60 and Manhole 40 is located near the
stream. The sewer cannot be shifted to the east because of the same reasons listed above.
Manhole 40 is currently located near the bank of the stream. This manhole cannot be
shifted to the east because of the location of the workshop. Currently, the alignment of
the construction corridor between Manhole 40 and Manhole 30 of the proposed sanitary
sewer abuts against the western face of the workshop. The route of the sewer is confined
between the workshop and the top of bank of the stream.
D e w b e r r
Dewberry & Davis LLC • Dewberry Design Group Incorporated • Dewberry & Davis, Inc. • Dewberry-Goodkind, Inc. • TOLK, Inc.
Mr. John Dorney
May 21, 2002
Page 2
The route proposed will have the least environmental impact and be less likely to cause
foundation impacts to surrounding structures. The route proposed on the stream side of
the workshop will allow the sewer to be installed at a relatively shallow depth, 4 to 6 feet
deep. This is important due to rock located in the area. The route will minimize the
environmental impact by minimizing the depth of the sewer, especially the portion of
sewer located parallel to the bank of the stream. There are less number of large trees that
would have to be removed within the proposed construction corridor on the creek side of
the workshop.
Any proposed sanitary sewer alignment on the east side (upland side) of the workshop
would have more of an environmental impact. There would be more large trees removed
within the construction corridor on the upland side of the workshop. Additionally, the
depth of the sewer would need to be 12 to 15 feet deep, directly east of the workshop.
Presently, the embankment around the upland side of the workshop is cut out to
accommodate the structure (see attached photographs). The sewer installation on the
upland side of the workshop might jeopardize the stability of the embankment around the
workshop due to the depth of excavation (especially if rock is encountered), possibly
shearing of the soil upslope above the workshop.
The proposed sanitary sewer will be constructed of ductile iron (ferrous) sewer pipe with
joints equivalent to water main standards meeting Administrative Code Section 15A
NCAC 2H .0200 - Waste Not Discharged to Surface Waters requirements. Erosion
control protection will also be implemented during construction.
The primary considerations for this project are the physical constraints of the existing
mature residential development which include existing houses and existing mature trees.
Secondary considerations include the potential to encounter rock when installing the
proposed sanitary sewer.
Photographs of the area along on the east side the workshop are included as exhibits to
this narrative. A plan showing where the pictures were taken is also included at the
bottom of each photograph.
2. The City of Raleigh intends on satisfying the mitigation requirement by paying the
mitigation fee for all of the Zone 1 encroachment area for this project.
Approximately 6,832 square feet of Zone 1 of the Neuse River Buffer will be encroached.
The mitigation factor is understood to be taking the area of land encroaching Zone 1 and
multiplying it by 3 to give an adjusted square foot. Once that quantity is determined, the
number is multiplied by dollar amount, $0.98/adjusted square foot. We have determined
for this project the following:
6,832 square feet * 3 = 20,496 adjusted square feet
20,496 * $0.98 = $20,086.08
Dewberry
Mr. John Dorney
May 21, 2002
Page 3
We would encourage you to discuss the project with Bob Zarzecki. Should you have any
additional questions or comments, please do not hesitate in calling our office.
Sincerely,
DEWBERRY & DAVIS,INC.
5;a?- --? .7 1 14
Christopher H. Brown, E.
Senior Associate
c: Dale Crisp, P.E., City of Raleigh
Jack Moyer, City of Raleigh
Joe Langston, P.E., Dewberry & Davis, Inc.
0:\PROIECrS\W013.wsUoMsdaleNDorney May 21.doc
Dewberry
FILL CGH
5-12-0 2
Date:
To: XRO chell
C
?FRO . e
Ke
?WaRO D eborah Sawyer
?WiRO Joanne Steenhuis
?WSRO Jennifer Frye
L;ARO Mike Parker
- - - - -?-- ?MRO Pete Golwell
Triage Check List
Project Name J °4.?,cj?le
DWQ Project Number
County
b Telephone (919) 733- CC 7Zro
From:
The file attached is being forwarded to you for your evaluation. Please call if you need
assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
? Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USGW topo maps
? Minimization/avoidance issues
uffer Rules euse Tar-Pamilco, Catawba, Randleman) 1 r ?.?.?p Vi
? Pond fill ??e.rraa5t? revret-sc c? . - . cI? «<
(?- ktigation Ratios D?f ? h-5 s?b? 'Al' I'-l ` 'V
? Ditching
? Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
T-Ms the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
??? Cumulative impact concerns
Comments-

Transaction #: 21113 Group #: 21751
City of Raleigh
Inspections Department
Building Permit
Inspector: LANE, JIM
Permit #: 8784
ADDREss: 6709 JOHNSDALE RD
Subdivision:
Lot Number:
Authorized Work: HOBBY/STORAGE
Work Type: Detached Accessory Building
Total Construction Cost: $3,000.00
Permit Approved by: LILLYD
Property Owner:
GREEN V GARCIA
Conditions/Comments: STAMPED PE LETTER
REQUIRED FOR DESIGN OF NON MASONRY
FOUNDATION. MAINTAIN MIN 50' FROM
STREAM-WILL HEAT WITH E SELF
CONTAINED UNIT. NOT FOR HABITABLE
SPA
Contractor: Stale License A'uniber.
GREEN V GARCIA
Permit Details
Permitted Square Footage: 900 sq ft
Building Total Stories: 1
Total Dwelling Units 1
Total Handicap Units:
City Limits: No
Historic Landmark:
Historic District:
Ownership: OTHERWISE/PRIVATELY
OWNED
NC PIN: 1717823777 000
Real Estate ID: 0004787
Square Footage used for calculation:
900 sq ft
Class Construction (new): VI U Mixed Occupancy: No
Class Construction (exist): Basement Occupancy: Unknown
Class Occupancy (new):RESIDENT SFD/DUPLEX Minimum Housing.
Class Occupancy (exist): Floodplain: Yes
Sprinkler/Standpipe: Unlmown
Water: Sewer.
Census Code: 434 / ADDITION/ALTERATION RESIDENTIAL BLDG
Zoning: RESIDENTIA1,4 (R-4)
Parcel Land Use (new): 110/ SINGLE FAMILY
Parcel Land Use (exist): 110 / SINGLE FAMILY
Building Land Use (new)110 / SINGLE FAMILY
Building Land Use (exist /
Unit Land Use (new): /
Unit Land Use (exist). /
`t
Total Permit Fee:
TOTAL FEE PAID:
$91.00
$91.00
10
Cashier FORDP Date Issued: 3/9/01 Payment Receipt #: 15632
p?O'? W AT PG
r
i r l i=
?? ? ? n? 13 2002
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT D
City of Raleigh
c/o: Mr. J. Russell Allen, City Manager
222 West Hargett Street
taw
aleigh, NC 27602
R
ii
May 7, 2002
DWQ Project # 02-0419
(Previously Approved under 01-0373)
Wake County
Subject Property: Johnsdale Road San'rtayt" WULNO" ?n, Raleigh, NC
Dewberry & Davis Project No. 00 "?--° _.
Unnamed tributary stream of Perry Creek [03-04-02; 27-25-(2); C NSW]
Dear Sirs:
On March 20, 2002, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your Pre-Construction Notification
(PCN) Application dated March 19, 2002 to impact 40 feet of stream and 10,995 square feet of protectetl riparian
buffers to construct the proposed sewer system at the subject property., Insufficient evidence is present in our
files to conclude that your project must be built as planned in waters and buffers in accordance with 15A NCAC
2H .0506 and 15A NCAC 2B .0233. Therefore, unless modifications of the proposal are made as described
below, we will have to move toward denial of your 401 Certification and Authorization. Certificate as required by
15A NCAC 2H .0507(e) and 15A NCAC 2B .0233 and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we
receive this additional information. We are requesting (by copy of this letter) that the US Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) place your project on administrative hold.
Please provide us with information supporting your position that states your project must be constructed
as planned and that you have no practicable alternative to impacting these waters and/or protected buffers.
Specifically;
1. Please provide information as to why the proposed sewer system and its associated construction
corridor can not be moved greater than ten (10) feet from the bank of the stream at the man-hole
located near the "workshop" (N 10043.2677, E 10136.68851 and the construction corridor from this
man-hole to approximately one hundred (100) feet south; &
2. Buffer mitigation will be required per 15A NCAC 213.0233 and .0242 for all "impacts other than
perpendicular crossings in Zone 1". Perpendicular crossings are those that intersect the surface
water at an angle between 75 degrees and 105 degrees. Please provide information as to how you
intend to satisfythis mitigation requirement as requested in Part X of the PCN application.
Any documentation such as maps and narratives that you can supply to address alternative designs for your
project may be helpful in our review of your 401 Certification. Please be aware that the sewer system will need
to comply with 15A NCAC 2H .0219(i)(2)(G) minimum separation requirements for sewer systems. Please also
be aware that impacts approved within the DWQ May 1, 2001 letter for DWQ Project No. 01-0373 remain valid
until the USACE, 404 permit approval expires. Any approval of this project will replace the May 1, 2001 approval.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 276042260 (Location)
Page 2 of 2
Please respond within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending this information to me and to Mr.
Steve Mitchell of the DWQ Raleigh Regional Office. If we do not hear from you in three weeks, we will assume
that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will consider the project as withdrawn. Please call Bob
Zarzecki at 919-733-9726 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
rv?' . Z' /(?4
Cc:
John Dorney,
401 Wetlands Unit, DWQ
Steve Mitchell, DWQ Raleigh Region4W-A'm-id'e'ZS IM
Joe Langston, Dewberry & Davis, Inc., 5505 Creedmoor Rd., Suite 150, Raleigh, NC 27612-6352
Dale Crisp, PE, Raleigh Public Utilities. Director, 222 West Hargett St., Raleigh, NC 27602
File copy
Central Files
DWQ 020419
May 7, 2002
To: SRO Steve Mitchell Project Name ??ynC[{G? Q[Q SQY1c?L`1!'? Sealer EX-4.
?FRO Ken Avefitte DWQ Project Number d y ( "
E]WaRO Deborah Sawyer County
DWRO Joanne Steenhuis
OWSRO Jennifer Frye
CARO Mike Parker
?MRO Pze CotweB ,?r11
. Telephone (919) 733- n
From: ?,, J;J
The file attached is being forwarded to you for your evaluation. Please call if you need
assis'i.cnce.
C Stream Irne`!n Qnpac'd
[ Stream d Larmirtation
Fi Wedand de erm"ir i and distance to blue-line surface waters on USGW topo maps
gin"uni-on/avcI issues
C 13uirer F'd (N Tar-Pamilco, Catawba, Randleman)
Pond fffl _
kFigz5on Fla-tics
C Are the s: ez--n a:-Z or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
G Cthec3c cl-awfi-,as for accuracy R - -
,; -..
ED is the a p`c=tion ccaisisterit with pre-application meetings? _
x
ect corxcerns
Q Cisn t? IIn
y? _ _ a r
?: y> "• _ ,!•?r?Sr-- K+Mn+- y+ :-.1-_ J a_ sig. aY . -.r"
= "- ,a4: ? a•--a+? Y`•?w?.' l•/',;?5 !mow^?.I-? .J[._? ^_h+•n?aw _
07
- - -_ -_ _ ,? ?.s?..z<- ? 5?6??T ^T?w :_.i??-i.;cL,??= 5.?+?T?'t- 'ir S ?•L•?:v+?; = %n:r- .i.
. 4_? _ ' "yip='./t'? } - i•Y?-:??3.!?? ~3r Q,,.. - ^- •i: y--c
Via=
.T :. - - -`?.?-_.f -•ET..,Y a,.3i?7r 4 t r._" .-v._.+W
...ii-•w=
-•- .. _- __ :mss-?_.._ --,-' ' _ . ' ??;, _ ? _„?-r- "?.-t'
-- ? Mti?iCr J J' 1?L?T ?y, ! 4 f ?a ` Ovl6-• _ ? Y 1? i ?"? j-•T+Y

Dewberry & Davis, Inc. ENGINEERS-PLANNERS-SURVEYORS
5505 Creedmoor Road, Suite 150 - Raleigh, NC 27612-6352
Voice 919-881-9939 Fax [phone] www.dewberry.com u 6
0
March 14, 2002
Mr. Bob Zarzecki
NC Division of Water Quality
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27607
020419
Reference: City of Raleigh Water and Sewer Projects Various Locations
Johnsdale Road Sanitary Sewer Extension
Dewberry & Davis, Inc. Project Number 00013 '
Dear Mr. Zarzecki: 100
0-
Enclosed for your review are the following:
• Application fee for $475.00
• Seven (7) copies of the Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Application From
• Seven (7) copies of Impact Justification and map
• Seven (7) copies of pictures of the area
• Seven (7) copies of the Soil Map
• Seven (7) copies of the US Geological Survey map
• Seven (7) copies of the plan and profile (8-1/2"x11") of the stream crossing sent to the
US Army Corps of Engineers
• Seven (7) copies of a letter from Mr. N. Macon Jackson
• Seven (7) copies of the plan and profile (24"x 36") sent to DWQ only, showing the area
in question.
The purpose of the project is to eliminate a wastewater pump station by extending a public
gravity sanitarv sewer *^ its location. The gravity sanitary sewer will provide more reliable
service and reduce the potential for sanitary sewage overflow.
project will impact Neuse River buffers. project route passes through an established
e ave een informed there is rock in the area which may hamper
construction. There is an existing workshop building, which currently encroaches into the
buffers. The route generally follows what we have been told is an abandoned sanitary
sewerage service. Please note the abandoned manhole (near proposed Manhole 60) and
cleanout (near Station 11+33).
One of the affected landowners, Mr. Nathaniel M. Jackson, has indicated he has been in contact
with you. Mr. Jackson said DWQ would approve the route as shown.
We have a meeting with residents on March 27, 2002, and the City would like to invite you or
one of your staff to attend.
it
III, Dewberry
Dewberry & Davis LLC • Dewberry Design Group Incorporated • Dewberry & Davis, Inc. • Goodkind & O'Dea, Inc. • Dewberry Technologies Inc. - TOLI, Inc.
Mr. Bob Zarzecki
March 19, 2002
Page 2
We look forward to receiving your comments.
Sincerely,
DEWBERRY & DAVIS, INC.
O• ;?W'
Joe L. Langston, P.E.
Project Engineer
c: John Dorney, NCDWQ
Todd Tugwell, US Army Corps of Engineers
Dale Crisp, P.E., City of Raleigh
Jack Moyer, City of Raleigh
Jon Eakins, P.E., Dewberry & Davis, Inc.
M. Lance King, E.I.T., S.I., Dewberry & Davis, Inc.
O: PROJECTS\OW13.ws\Johnsdale\bob March 19.doc
Dewberry
Office Use Only: Form Version October 2001
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No.
If any particular item is not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A" rather than
leaving the space blank.
1. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit
? Section 10 Permit
® 401 Water Quality Certification
® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: Nationwide 12
3. If this notification is solely a courtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here: ?
4. If payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (NCWRP) is proposed for
mitigation of impacts (see section VIII - Mitigation), check here: ?
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: City of Raleigh, Attn: J. Russell Allen, City Manager
Mailing Address: 222 West Hargett Street
Raleigh, NC 27602
Telephone Number: 919-890-3400 Fax Number: 919-890-3600
E-mail Address:
2. Agent- Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter must= -be
attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number: Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
Page 5 of 12
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
1. Name of project: Johnsdale Road Sanitary Sewer Extension
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): n/a
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): see attached sheet
4. Location
County: Wake Nearest Town: Raleigh
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number):
Directions to site (include road numbers, landmarks, etc.): from the intersection of Spring_
Forest Road & Atlantic Ave, go north on Atlantic Ave, turn left (west) on Johnsdale Road.
The sewer line starts on Ravenhill Dr. and extends to where Johnsdale makes a right turn.
5. Site coordinates, if available (UTM or Lat/Long): see attached sheet
(Note - If project is linear, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that separately lists the
coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
6. Describe the existing land use or condition of the site at the time of this application:
Residential
7. Property size (acres): Construction corridor -1.1 acres
8. Nearest body of water (stream/river/sound/ocean/lake): U.T. of Perrp Creek
9. River Basin: Neuse
(Note - this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/mgps/.)
Page 6 of 12
10. Describe the purpose of the proposed work: Elimination of small sanitary sewerage
pump station by extension of public gravity sanitary sewer. Elimination of the pump station
will reduce potential for sanitary sewerage overflows.
11. List the type of equipment to be used to construct the project: trackhoe with sawcutter,
trackhoe backhoe bulldozer, front end loader Ramax and skidder
12. Describe the land use in the vicinity of this project: Residential
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past; please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules.
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application:
n/a
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters-of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. The applicant must also
provide justification for these impacts in Section VII below. All proposed impacts, permanent
and temporary, must be listed herein, and must be clearly identifiable on an accompanying site
plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial) must be shown on a
delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems. Wetland and stream
evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate. Photographs may be
included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for wetland or stream
mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional space is needed for
listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 7 of 12
1. Wetland Impacts
Wetland Impact
Site Number
(indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Located within
100-year Floodplain**
(es/no) Distance to
Nearest Stream
(linear feet)
Type of Wetland***
1 Excavation/fill < 0.1 No < 1 Stream Crossing
2 Excavation/fill < 0.1 No < 1 Stream Bank Impact

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: mechanized clearing, grading, fill,
excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams, separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding.
** 100-Year floodplains are identified through the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRM), or FEMA-approved local floodplain maps. Maps are available through the FEMA Map Service Center at 1-800-358-9616, or
online at http://www.fema.gov.
*** List a wetland type that best describes wetland to be impacted (e.g., freshwater/saltwater marsh, forested wetland, beaver pond,
Carolina Bay, bog, etc.)
List the total acreage (estimated) of existing wetlands on the property: <0.1 acre (within
construction corridor
Total area of wetland impact proposed: <0.1 acre
2. Stream Impacts, including all intermittent and perennial streams
Stream Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Length of
Impact
(linear feet)
Stream Name** Average Width
of Stream
Before Impact Perennial or
Intermittent?
( leasespecify)
1 Excavation, rip 20 LF U.T. of Perry Creek 5 ft. Perennial
Rap placement
2 Excavation, rip 20 LF U.T. of Perry Creek 5 ft. Perennial
Rap placement

**
List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: culverts and associated rip-rap,
dams (separately list impacts due to both structure and flooding), relocation (include linear feet before and after, and net loss/gain),
stabilization activities (cement wall, rip-rap, crib wall, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is
proposed, plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams must be included.
Stream names can be found on USGS topographic maps. If a stream has no name, list as UT (unnamed tributary) to the nearest
downstream named stream into which it flows. USGS maps are available through the USGS at 1-800-358-9616, or online at
www.uses.¢ov. Several internet sites also allow direct download and printing of USGS maps (e.g., www.topozone.com,
www.mapquest.com, etc.).
Cumulative impacts (linear distance in feet) to all streams on site: 40 LF
Page 8 of 12
3. Open Water Impacts, including Lakes, Ponds, Estuaries, Sounds, Atlantic Ocean and any
other Water of the U.S.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma)
Type of Impact* Area of
Impact
(acres) Name of Waterbody

(if applicable) Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound,
bay, ocean, etc.)
None

* List each impact separately and identify temporary impacts. Impacts include, but are not limited to: fill, excavation, dredging,
flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
4. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ? uplands ? stream ? wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): n/a
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.): n/a
Size of watershed draining to pond: n/a Expected pond surface area: n/a
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
_ were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
:techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts.
See attached sheets
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
Page 9 of 12
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on March 9, 2000, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCWRP concurrence shall be placed on hold as
incomplete. An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration
in DWQ's Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strmgide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
n/a
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
Program (NCWRP) with the NCWRP's written agreement. Check the box indicating that
you would like to pay into the NCWRP. Please note that payment into the NCWRP must be
reviewed and approved before it can be used- to satisfy mitigation requirements.- Applicants
will be notified early in the review process by the 401/Wetlands Unit if payment into the
NCWRP is available as an option. For additional information regarding the application
process for the NCWRP, check the NCWRP website at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If
use of the NCWRP is proposed, please check the appropriate box on page three and provide
the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): n/a
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): n/a
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): n/a
Amount of Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): n/a
Page 10 of 12
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): n/a
IX. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Only)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public funds or the use of public (federal/state/local)
land?
Yes ® No ?
If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at [phone] to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ? No ® n/a
If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please attach a
copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter.
Yes ? No ? n/a
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (DWQ Only)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Meuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and
Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please identify )?
Yes ® No ? If you answered "yes", provide the following information:
Identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers. If buffer
mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the buffer
multipliers.
Zone* (s uare feet) Multiplier Required
1 6,832 3 none
2 4,163 1.5 none
Total 10,995 none
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
Page 11 of 12
If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e., Donation
of Property, Conservation Easement, Riparian Buffer Restoration / Enhancement, Preservation or
Payment into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as
identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0260.
n/a
M. Stormwater (DWQ Only)
-Describe impervious acreage (both existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site.
Discuss stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands
downstream from the property.
Existing impervious areas are existing houses and residential streets. No additional impervious
areas are proposed. Check dams and silt fence will be used to protect turface waters.
MI. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Only)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The new sanitary sewer will connect to and existing anitary sewer main and sewage will be
be routed to the existing Raleigh WWTP on the Neuse River.
XIII. Violations (DWQ Only)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ? No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application?
Yes ? No
XIV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
none
0 31,4 F /Zao Z
Applidant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 12 of 12
Stream Crossing Locations
The proposed sewer extension crosses a distinct water body at the following locations:
1S` Stream Impact Location
35° 52' 22" N 78° 36'01" W
2°d Stream Impact Location
35° 52' 20" N 78° 36'01" W
Impacted Property PINs
The following properties will be impacted by the proposed construction
1717-83-2169
1717-83-3179
1717-82-3652
1717-82-3777
1717-82-4921

Impact Justification
Background
The proposed sanitary sewer corridor is located in a mature residential development on
Ravenhill Road and Johnsdale Road in northern Raleigh, NC. The site corridor is not
within the city limits of Raleigh, but is surrounded by the city limits. There is an existing
sanitary sewerage pump station on Ravenhill Road used for transport of sewage from the
houses within the city limits. Houses on Johnsdale Road are on private septic systems
and water supply wells.
The City of Raleigh is interested in taking action to eliminate the maintenance and
overflow concerns of the Ravenhill Road pump station. To accomplish this, the City is
investigating abandoning the pump station and installing a gravity sanitary sewer in its
place. Secondary benefits of the gravity sanitary sewer include the ability of houses
along the alignment to tie into the main if their septic systems fail.
Proposed Construction
A gravity sanitary sewer from the Ravenhill Road pump station to the existing manhole
north of the pump station should flow from the pump station east to Johnsdale Road and
north along Johnsdale Road. From the northern end of Johnsdale Road, we evaluated
three alternates to tie into the existing manhole. The summaries below reference the plan
included as an exhibit with this narrative.
All of the routes assume the sanitary sewer will flow along Ravenhill Road from the
pump station area, west toward Johnsdale Road, and north along Johnsdale Road to the
driveway of 6705 Johnsdale Road (Don and Dorothy Roberts property). This is the
starting point for the three routes.
Route 1:
The sanitary sewer would begin at the intersection of Johnsdale Road and the driveway at
6705 Johnsdale Road, and run westerly along the driveway to a point. This point will be
located approximately 10' to 20' west of the toe of slope of the driveway to_the_Green V.
Garcia property. The location of this point will be encroaching in Zone 2; and Zone 1. of
the Neuse River Buffer. From this point, the sewer will run in a northerly direction along
and parallel to a perennial stream. This portion of the sanitary sewer route will encroach
in Zone 1 of the Neuse River Buffer. The route of the sewer will run : parallel to the
stream and run between a large storage structure and the top of bank of the stream. The
sewer will continue to run parallel to the stream and connect to an existing 4' I.D.
manhole.
Typically under the Neuse River Buffer rules, the alignment of the sanitary sewer would
normally be at least 50 feet from the edge of bank. In order to serve the area by gravity,
the further the sanitary sewer is from the stream bank, the deeper the sanitary sewer is to
Impact Justification
Page 2
be constructed. The deeper the sewer main, the wider the trench will need to be to install
the sanitary sewer. The wider the trench, the wider the area of disturbance. Due to steep
topography and rock in the area, and due to a large workshop located approximately 30
feet from the edge of bank, we recommend the route of the sanitary sewer run parallel to
the stream (see attached Drawings). We have tried to minimize the environmental impact
by minimizing the depth of the sewer, where possible.
The length of disturbance across the stream is approximately 20 feet (top of bank to top
of bank).
The benefits of this route include:
• Minimizing damage of large trees by a wider trench and routing around the large
storage structure and house. We believe the variance is justified.
Route 2:
From the beginning point, Route 2 consists of running the gravity sanitary sewer along
the right of way of Johnsdale Road (SR 2086) to a point located approximately between
the Nathaniel M. & Mildred Jackson and Green V. Garcia properties. At this point the
route of the sewer would run northwesterly along the property line between the two
properties. The sewer would run to a point located approximately 40 feet from the top of
bank of the stream. The sewer then would then run along and parallel to the Neuse River
Buffer (encroaching in Zone 2 of the Neuse River Buffer) until it reaches a point where
the sanitary sewer will cross the stream and tie to an existing manhole.
This route is not favorable due to:
• The fact that proposed sanitary sewer would be installed along a paved driveway
and large ornamental retaining rock wall.
• Large hardwood trees would have to be removed and two utility poles would have
to be moved and relocated.
• More importantly, the depth of the sewer would be approximately 29 feet deep
near the intersection of the property line and Johnsdale Road right of way line.
• Where the sewer is located between two houses, the depth of the line would be
approximately 22 feet deep. It would be recommended that a permanent sanitary
sewer easement with an excessive width (minimum 40 feet wide) be acquired at -
the locations where the depth of the sewer is deeper than 15 feet. The easement
could encroach in the houses, which is not acceptable.
Route 3:
Route 3 consists of running the gravity sanitary sewer along the right of way of Johnsdale
Road (SR 2086) to a point located on the eastern most boundary line of Nathaniel M. &
Mildred Jackson property. At this point, the sewer would run northwesterly along the
property line to a point. At this point, the sewer would turn and run in a westerly
direction along the northernmost property boundary line of the property. The route of the
Impact Justification
Page 3
sanitary sewer would continue in a westerly direction to a point where the sanitary sewer
crosses the stream and ties to an existing manhole.
This route is not favorable due to:
• The fact that the depth of the sanitary sewer would be between 37 feet to 42 feet
deep along a portion of Johnsdale Road and the eastern most property of
Nathaniel M. & Mildred Jackson property.
• Large hardwood trees will have to be removed. It would be recommended that a
permanent sanitary sewer easement with an excessive width (minimum 60 feet)
be acquired at the locations where the depth of the manhole is 30 feet in depth or
greater. The easement could encroach in the houses, which is not acceptable.
Summary and Recommendations
The primary considerations for this project are the physical constraints of the existing
mature residential development which include existing houses and existing mature trees.
Secondary considerations include the potential to encounter rock when installing the
proposed sanitary sewer.
Routes 2 and 3 would involve installing the sanitary sewer at depths that may structurally
undermine existing residences, would significantly effect the constructability of the
sewer, and may require existing residences to be within permanent sanitary sewer
easements. All three routes would require the sewer to cross the stream from west to east
to tie into an existing manhole on the east side of the stream. Due to the significant
potential impact on the existing residences, we recommend that Route 1 be used for this
project. Regardless of the route chosen, impacts to Zone 1 and Zone 2 Neuse River
buffers will be minimized, and no fill, temporary of permanent, will be placed in the
buffer zones.
Photos of the area along the recommended route where the Zone 1 and Zone 2 buffers
will be impacted are included as exhibits to this narrative. A plan showing where the
pictures were taken is also included.
77-
m
w
' II?D o
0) r
_J
I F
a?
iA VV ? ? 0
r
l
r t i>^
` L
.o
0
N
D
z
a
CO)
m
m
M
0
c
m
n
r
rn
z
a
m
a
3<.95 SZ.98S_____- - -
0
°
/ 0 ,cam
"l? "1SL
Q)
Z
0
a
0
J
0
0
_.
IL
a
w ?
II om
LLI
/ \ {* = o ° x
zo'-
/ ' O 0
IA '1St
z
\ 07 0
°o ? 6\
\ ? ? gal
',? "1SL \
1 ? \ n U
\ CO x
d w a
t \ ° IA "1SL z o
W
dg ° ir
o On
z ° CL
0 00
(0 0
!IC
L) 9
p
oo w S \ c
<D ,
M aw z J pz p -
° d Z N \
0 ox d O
p ? Z
?n
x
to QZW (0 QW , o
V?? 2 2
r Q
z

°
Opy \
;7nn;) 77 •cT 'TT OT ipw nnw fitAn'7nCTCn IUaLIIUfiTTV - sunT1QO01 olou.4\6MO\Tpinno\rnHri'ASrq\ :H
640x48Ox24(R G B)
640x48Ox24(RGB)
640x48Ox24(R G B)
640x48Ox24(RGB)
640x48Ox24(R G B)
\-J-?
640x48Ox24(R G B)
640x48Ox24(RGB)
640x48Ox24(RGB)
DCP05149.JPG
640x48Ox24(RGB)
DCP05150.JPG
640x48Ox24(RGB)
\\rall\admn\Eakins\000131\DCIMAGES ladmn on rallI
640x48Ox24(RGB)
DCP05140.JPG
640x48Ox24(RGB)
?.0?..?.?
N
z
I
11
cil
\
AXL xZ ? $ CID z
0 \
--o m rn ? 0 L
f
m m
N :U 16S
C rrn ? O
rmn;u

z ? m
z o° z 0

1S Tj FL.
my yyy???
V \
A ?
CTS `
ni
\ \
A D t
rn o
IN .25" IRF

?b
' V
? rn O
coax
_WO
? Z
E"0203.211'
iN P;NCH .75" IPF
Zp
00
0m
(n 0
ml
;o
mm 1 \
c m
S'
n ;o
(m A 10??, ?O
Dx N_V c? s Ct?
N) co
D- cam
A j n ? NJU
(n N o / O
m N - J JS 8 :33'58
f
zi
f TBRIDGE .
A E / 00
OTBRIDG -0
N ? ? \
N
1
o m
JOHNSDALE ROAD
SANITARY SEWER
EXTENSION
CITY OF RALEIGH

0
c
41, .0 m
X a
Is Dewbetry & Davis. Im
A DeWbeny Company
6605 cmdrow Road, Sub 150
RWBM NO 27M
TW@Ow M : (910 8819699 Fa:: (619) e81-6926
1
z
cmi °V' rm-
z u 3
a
C) R,
s
7_ 3 p -
m 0 NO
N
zz
\\

?j
IN z

\ m c
6G, N m
? c<
\c:;u

1\ NZ
Om

ZC
m U)
m ?
P

?y?
V

x N O
O O O O
? N
H O o
Z
o

y p
RI +
21
15.!
t-+ 27 9
IN O JT 27f .57
U1
C?

II II a

V
?
II ?
i.?

O +
p
O O

14' I H W TI

1 + 12., 7

RI
29
6
M 4

v IN 0 = 8 .7 {
N `
(A 4' I MH W H p

+
O p RI 2 971 0
p I R I = 21 0. 8
j
I
IT
. 0
=
29(
.7
29 i
1

t D
r Qj

i6m 6=6=
JOHNSDALE ROAD Dewbetry Davb, Inc.
SANITARY SEWER A Dem?terry Company

EXTENSION 6606 Cmedmow Road Sub 150 &+dMa?a
CITY OF RALEIGH ftMA NC =2 FLnwra
Tdeowm : ON) 684609 Fax : 019) 681-M 6uwy=
RALEIGH. N w-vAwAmWm a
'oul'yoatdew'L66t (0) wswtdoo
u0lsu4x3 jameS kieVueS peon{ alepsuyor:uogdeo
M ..8'£S .SE .8LO N ..£'9Z .ZS 05£0 :uo4e00-1
;aa; OOOZ slenbe 4oul L :aleoS
ZOOZ/ZZ/L Ae0
1Sbr3 HOGIV8 :aweN
M ..00'0 .SE .8L0 M ..000 96.8L9 cwno
•r. :
91
cf.
1 r 1,

I

. .6
_
_

U , 'A"ff

?
I
.. ?
? t!
??
/
r4
I
_ .11 ' .. `'

lJ >("'.
(1 .:yam ,/.'_ ?• •
,
? t . y:.: `??? ?
??? _ 0.
111
p
. a /'
. ,-. l k ?? . ice, : is _ 1
lo
, \
/-?.
.
• \

.? ION
.. .. }.
•
L ?, r ,
? ??

Iles
?
?
r
/
?
J •?
?/??? l.- .
? I !'' O l
i "
?•
?
f-. \flft
02
V
, saca ss.& ? ? "
1
t'/J
?
,
? .,
-
I ?
•
_
?.
1
7

` \.`,\ `?' of -. - f-? ? ?t.??`?" `? ??• ?//!1' o
f
?i--rte
l ? I , •
? .
'
//- '
,
t,,
? :
.?•J?T?ii1.'' ? -l ? 'P ?
1 ; '. J
,•?, ,
?

- N

.J ? •
? 1. I ? ? ? ?...,? , r I?,? / (/f
`\\\\\/ \/ / ? I
- VA ? I
M .000 8£ .8L0 A A..00'0 9E .8L N
A
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Attention: John Dorney
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27607
Dear Mr. Dorney:
Dale Crisp called me today and requested I write you a letter expressing my concern
with the proposed City of Raleigh sanitary sewer alignment across my property at 6713
Johnsdale Road.
The proposed alignment encroaches in the Neuse River buffer zone 2 for 317 feet,
with 204 feet being in zone 1, as it crosses the upstream adjoining lot. After the line
clears my neighbor's workshop, the alignment turns uphill away from the creek and exits
the buffer very close to my property line. At my property line the sewer is approximately
12 feet deep and is 20 feet deep at the manhole at the other side of m? lot. This depth
requires a 40 foot construction easement. From the manhole the sewer line turns almost
90 degrees downhill and crosses the creek to an existing manhole located 10 -15 feet on
the other side of the creek. This section to the existing manhole is in the buffer for
approximately 70 feet. The existing sewer below my property was constructed before the
Neuse Rules were enacted and are in the buffer zone.
I suggested a different alignment - roughly along the alignment of the abandoned
sanitary sewer line from Millbrook High School. This alignment would require an
additional encroachment in the buffer zone of 120 - 130 feet. If the City's proposed
alignment is followed, the only portion of the sewer in compliance with the rules would
be the portion across my property. Considering the additional cost and damage to my
property, this appears very illogical.
The City staff refused to consider an alternate alignment until after the hearing before
the City Council, Public Works Committee. If you look at my proposed route I think you
will find it poses no additional threat to the environment and would be considerably
cheaper to. install. I don't consider it an unreasonable request for you to consider an
alternate route.
If you have any questions, please call at 876-0592.
Sincerely,
N. Macon Jackson, Jr.
March 18, 2002
6713 Johnsdale Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
?•t o-t 7 FX o f` R r
nnv?s 3r4 c. T114
- ?T)lC
A 1,l t, r? M 1Ir r OT
f Ok J/+ C(c.ra,? 1S i1?g
ALl br,MR,,-r
PkC-Kf,4 .2! 1s
e If &PA ?
1,/&5=" o r, .
.,??LoQ os nLtti
r4 O'C' S N a ?„r rt
O??F w A TFi9pG Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources .
p 'C Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D., Acting Director
Division of Water Quality
May 7, 2002
DWQ Project # 02-0419
(Previously Approved under 01-0373)
Wake County
CERTIFIED MAIL - RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED
City of Raleigh t%?l
c/o: Mr. J. Russell Allen, City Manager
222 West Hargett Street
. ?,
Raleigh, NC 27602
Subject Property: Johnsdale Road Sanitary Sewer Extension, Raleigh, NC
Dewberry & Davis Project No. 00013
Unnamed tributary stream of Perry Creek [03-04-02; 27-25-(2); C NSW]
Dear Sirs:
On March 20, 2002, the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) received your Pre-Construction Notification .
(PCN) Application dated March 19, 2002 to impact 40 feet of stream and 10,995 square feet of protected riparian
buffers to construct the proposed sewer system at the subject property. Insufficient evidence is present in our
files to conclude that your project must be built as planned in waters and buffers in accordance with 15A NCAC
2H .0506 and 15A NCAC 213.0233. Therefore, unless modifications of the proposal are made as described
below, we will have to move toward denial of your 401 Certification and Authorization Certificate as required by
15A NCAC 2H .0507(e) and 15A NCAC 2B .0233 and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we
receive this additional information. We are requesting (by copy of this letter) that the US Army Corps of
Engineers (USAGE) place your project on administrative hold.
Please provide us with information supporting your position that states your project must be constructed
as planned and that you have no practicable alternative to impacting these waters and/or protected buffers.
Specifically;
1. Please provide information as to why the proposed sewer system and its associated construction
corridor can not be moved greater than ten (10) feet from the bank of the stream at the man-hole
located near the "workshop" (N 10043.2677, E 10136.6885) and the construction corridor from this
man-hole to approximately one hundred (100) feet south; &
2. Buffer mitigation will be required per 15A NCAC 213 .0233 and .0242 for all "impacts other than
perpendicular crossings in Zone 1 ". Perpendicular crossings are those that intersect the surface
water at an angle between 75 degrees and 105 degrees. Please provide information as to how you
intend to satisfy this mitigation requirement as requested in Part X of the PCN application.
Any documentation such as maps and narratives that you can supply to address alternative designs for your
project may be helpful in our review of your 401 Certification. Please be aware that the sewer system will need
to comply with 15A NCAC 2H .0219(i)(2)(G) minimum separation requirements for sewer systems. Please also
be aware that impacts approved within the DWQ May 1, 2001 letter for DWQ Project No. 01-0373 remain valid
until the USACE, 404 permit approval expires. Any approval of this project will replace the May 1, 2001 approval.
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, 401 Wetlands Certification Unit,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwegands/
Page 2 of 2
Please respond within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending this information to me and to Mr.
Steve Mitchell of the DWQ Raleigh Regional Office. If we do not hear from you in three weeks, we will assume
that you no longer want to pursue this project and we will consider the project as withdrawn. Please call Bob
Zarzecki at 919-733-9726 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
s
John Dorney,
' 401 Wetlands Unit, DWQ
Cc: Steve Mitchell, DWQ Raleigh Regional Office
Joe Langston, Dewberry & Davis, Inc., 5505 Creedmoor Rd., Suite 150, Raleigh, NC 27612-6352
Dale Crisp, PE, Raleigh Public Utilities Director, 222 West Hargett St., Raleigh, NC 27602
File copy
Central Files
DWQ 020419
May 7, 2002
EMORANDUM
I O: . John Dorney Regional Contact: Steve Mitchell
Non-Discharge Branch WQ Supervisor:
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Tohnsdale Road Sanitary Sewer Extension County Wake
Project Number 02 0419 County2
Recvd From APP Region Raleigh
Received Date 3/20/02 Recvd By Region
Project Type utility line
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts. (ft.)
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet ME
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
12 I 7T -@)N 127-25-(2) Fc- NSW 30,402. 0.10 40.00
NBP. d Y 9 N 130,4-2.
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres ` Feet
I F_ F F_
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y 0 N Did you request more info? 0 Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y O N
Is Mitigation required? 0 Y 0 N Recommendation: 0 Issue O Issue/fond 0 Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) Longitude (ddmmss)
Comments:
ZONE ONE IMPAGIS
l
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney
Non-Discharge Branch
Regional Contact: Steve Mitchell
WQ Supervisor:
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Johnsdale Road Sanitary Sewer Extension County Wake
Project Number 02 0419 ` County2
Recvd From APP 2 ( Region Raleigh
Received Date 3/20/02 Recvd By Regiono
Project type utility line
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet ME
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
12 ?OY O N ? 27-25-(2) F-c- NSW 30,402. F-0.- F 10 40.00 ?F-
i?TBR ? Q Y -@N ?? ?? 30>402. r
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType ` Type Acres Feet
I F_ r F_
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? Q Y O N Did you request more info? Q Y Q N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? Q Y O N
Is Mitigation required? p Y O N . Recommendation: Q Issue Q Issue/Cond O Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) Longitude (ddmmss)

Comments:
ZONE ONE IMPACTS
?'
-
?XS! (?mot
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1

03
'aeu
Dewberry & Davis, Inc. ENGINEERS-PLANNERS- SURVEYORS
-5505 Creedmoor Road, Suite 150 • Raleigh, NC 27612-6352
Voice 919-881-9939 Fax [phone] www.dewberry.com
March 14, 2002
Mr. John Dorney
NC Division of Water Quality ?-
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250
Raleigh, NC 27607
Reference: City of Raleigh
Johnsdale Sanitary Sewer Extension
Dewberry & Davis, Inc. Project Number 00013
Dear Mr. Dorney:
Enclosed for your review is a preliminary alignment for a sanitary sewer extension for the City of
Raleigh. We would appreciate your review and comments on the alignment prior to a formal permit
application being submitted.
The purpose of the project is to eliminate a wastewater pump station by extending a public gravity
sanitary sewer to its location. The gravity sanitary sewer will provide more reliable service and
reduce the potential for sanitary sewage overflow.
The project will impact Neuse River buffers. The project route passes through an established
residential neighborhood. We have been informed there is rock in the area which may hamper
construction. There is an existing workshop building, which currently encroaches into the buffers.
The route generally follows what we have been told is an abandoned sanitary sewerage service.
Please note the abandoned manhole (near proposed Manhole 60) and cleanout (near Station 11+33).
One of the affected landowners, Mr. Nathaniel M. Jackson, has indicated he has been in contact with
you. Mr. Jackson said DWQ would approve the route as shown.
We have a meeting with residents on March 27, 2002, and the City would like to invite you or one of
your staff to attend.
We look forward to receiving your comments.
Sincerely,
DEWBERRY & DVINC.
7. ??))c ristopher H. BroSenior Associate
c: Dale Crisp, P.E., City of Raleigh
Jack Moyer, City of Raleigh
Joe Langston, P.E., Dewberry & Davis, Inc.
O: PROJECTS\00013.ws\Johnsdale\Domey March 14.doc
,.g
__1 Dewberry
U'
Dewberry & Davis LLC • Dewberry Design Group Incorporated • Dewberry & Davis, Inc. • Goodkind & O'Dea, Inc. • Dewberry Technologies Inc. • TOLI, Inc.
Johnsdale Road Sanitary Sewer Extension
NOT TO SCALE
i
ti
SS ?.
nn
I O:\KING\Projects\City of Raleig-Wohnsdale Rd Sewer\Pictures_05-14-02.doc
to Dewberry & Davis
May 14, 2002 Project No. 00013L
Johnsdale Road Sanitary Sewer Extension
May 14, 2002 Project No. 00013L
1 O:\KING\Projects\City of Raleigh\Johnsdale Rd Sewer\Pictures_0I-09-02.doc
Dewberry & Davis
NOT TO SCALE
s
4
s
S
ss?

2 OAKINGTrojects\City of Raleigh\Johnsdale Rd SewerTictures_05-14-02.doc
J! Dewberry & Davis
Johnsdale Road Sanitary Sewer Extension
May 14, 2002 Project No. 00013L

NOT TO SCALE
- - Zr
-I
I
3 O:\KING\Projects\City of RaleigWohnsdale Rd Sewer\Pictures_05-14-02.doc
J Dewberry & Davis
Johnsdale Road Sanitary Sewer Extension
May 14, 2002 Project No. 00013L
NOT TO SCALE
SS
?s
4 O:\KING\Projects\City of Raleigh\dohnsdale Rd Sewer\Pictures_05-14-02.doc
J? Dewberry & Davis
Johnsdale Road Sanitary Sewer Extension
May 14, 2002 Project No. 00013L
NOT TO SCALE
yti
1 s
SS ^,
SSi
S f?
S

5 O:\KING\Projects\City of RaleighUohnsdale Rd Sewer\Pictures_05-14-02.doe
"l' Dewberry & Davis
Johnsdale Road Sanitary Sewer Extension
May 14, 2002 Project No. 00013L
NOT TO SCALE
i
O"
ss - -
I
I
I
6 OAKINGTrojects\City of RaleighUohnsdale Rd SewerTictures_05-14-02.doc
4,1 Dewberry & Davis
Johnsdale Road Sanitary Sewer Extension
May 14, 2002 Project No. 00013L
Johnsdale Road Sanitary Sewer Extension
9- SS -
NOT TO SCALE
5
i
SS/
lJ
i
SS -------- f
7 O:\KING\Projects\City oP RaleighUohnsdale Rd Sewer\Pictures_05-14-02.doc
Dewberry & Davis
May 14, 2002 Project No. 00013L
NOT TO SCALE
S?
S -_? /
J\ 1
S
yy
S

8 0:\KING\Projects\City of Raleigh\Johnsdale Rd Sewer\Pictures_05-14-02.doc
Dewberry & Davis
Johnsdale Road Sanitary Sewer Extension
May 14, 2002 Project No. 00013L
?-- SS
NOT 70 SCALE /
i
yy
S
? J
s"
ss
9 O:\KING\Projects\City of RaleighUohnsdale Rd Sewer\Pictures_05-14-02.doc
1 Dewberry & Davis
Johnsdale Road Sanitary Sewer Extension
May 14, 2002 Project No. 00013L
10 OAKINGTrojects\City of Raleigh\dohnsdale Rd SewerTictures_05-14-02.doc
4 Dewberry & Davis
Johnsdale Road Sanitary Sewer Extension
May 14, 2002 Project No. 00013L
Johnsdale Road Sanitary Sewer Extension
May 14, 2002 Project No. 00013L

NOT TO SCA_=
SS.
i?s

O
1 1 0:\KING\Projects\City of Raleigh\Johnsdale Rd Sewer\Pictures_05-14-02.doc
Dewberry & Davis
Johnsdale Road Sanitary Sewer Extension
NOT TO SCALE
7? .
I
I
12 OAKIN&ProjectsWity of RaleighUohnsdale Rd Sewer\Pictures_05-14-02.doc
f Dewberry & Davis
May 14, 2002 Project No. 00013L
Johnsdale Road Sanitary Sewer Extension
May 14, 2002 Project No. 00013L
i

a?
NOT TO SCALE
VIV

i?
i _
13 0:\KiNG\Projects\City of Raleigh\Johnsdale Rd Sewer\Pictures_05-14-02.doc
Dewberry & Davis

NOT TO SCALE
I
I
14 0:\KIN&Projects\City of RaleigWohnsdale Rd Sewer\Pictures_05-14-02.doc
1 Dewberry & Davis
Johnsdale Road Sanitary Sewer Extension
May 14, 2002 Project No. 00013L
NOT TO SCALE
CS)
I
I
15 OAKINGTrojects\City of Raleigh\Johnsdale Rd SewerTictureS_05-14-02.doc
iu Dewberry & Davis
Johnsdale Road Sanitary Sewer Extension
May 14, 2002 Project No. 00013L
NOT TO SCALE
1
SS"
o?
- c?
16 O:\KING\Projects\City of Raleigh\Johnsdale Rd Sewer\Pictures_05-14-02.doc
1l Dewberry & Davis
Johnsdale Road Sanitary Sewer Extension
May 14, 2002 Project No. 00013L
NOT TO SCALE
f?
7I
i
17 O:\KING\Projects\City of Rate igh\Johnsdale Rd Sewer\Pictures_05-14-02.doc
40 Dewberry & Davis
Johnsdale Road Sanitary Sewer Extension
May 14, 2002 Project No. 00013L

North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Attention: John Dorney
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Suite 250
Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
Dear Mr. Dorney:
L i'J t(u^+' ??
MAR 2 0 2002
?'ETLRP?S G;FO?p?
Dale Crisp called me today and requested I write you a letter expressing my concern
with the proposed City of Raleigh sanitary sewer alignment across my property at 6713
Johnsdale Road.
The proposed alignment encroaches in the Neuse River buffer zone 2 for 317 feet,
with 204 feet being in zone 1, as it crosses the upstream adjoining lot. After the line
clears my neighbor's workshop, the alignment turns uphill away from the creek and exits
the buffer very close to my property line. At my property line the sewer is approximately
12 feet deep and is 20 feet deep at the manhole at the other side of my lot. This depth
requires a 40 foot construction easement. From the manhole the sewer line turns almost
90 degrees downhill and crosses the creek to an existing manhole located 10 -15 feet on
the other side of the creek. This section to the existing manhole is in the buffer for
approximately 70 feet. The existing sewer below my property was constructed before the
Neuse Rules were enacted and are in the buffer zone.
I suggested a different alignment - roughly along the alignment of the abandoned
sanitary sewer line from Millbrook High School. This alignment would require an
additional encroachment in the buffer zone of 120 - 130 feet. If the City's proposed
alignment is followed, the only portion of the sewer in compliance with the rules would
be the portion across my property. Considering the additional cost and damage to my
property, this appears very illogical.
The City staff refused to consider an alternate alignment until after the hearing before
the City Council, Public Works Committee. If you look at my proposed route I think you
will find it poses no additional threat to the environment and would be considerably
cheaper to install. I don't consider it an unreasonable request for you to consider an
alternate route.
If you have any questions, please call at 876-0592.
Sincerely,
N. Macon Jackson, Jr.
? goy
March 18, 2002
6713 Johnsdale Road
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
)Ob 01
R??
JohnsdaleRdSewerRaleigh03-22-02
Subject: FW: FW: Johnsdale Road Sanitary Sewer Extension
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 08:56:44 -0500
From: "Crisp, Dale" <[e-mail]>
To: "John Dorney" <[e-mail]>,
"Bob Zarzecki" <[e-mail]>,
"Steve Mitchell" <[e-mail]>
CC: "Brown, Chris" <[e-mail]>,
"Langston, Joe" <[e-mail]>,
"Moyer, Jack" <[e-mail]>,
"Mildred Jackson" <[e-mail]>
Attached is the letter I received from Macon Jackson regarding our pro
posed subject sewer extension project. Macon's letter is a little conf
using in that he refers to two alignments. The proposed sewer alignmen
t that our consultants have submitted to you and that we are submittin
g the PCN form for is the alignment that Mr. jackson and his neighbors
support. Thanks for your consideration.
Again, we (our consultants, CORPUD staff and effected property owners)
would like to meet with you to discuss this proposed alignment on Mar
ch 27th. Let me know what time your available and where (your office i
f necessary). Dale
H. Dale Crisp, P.E.
Raleigh Public Utilities Director
(919)-890-3400 fax [phone]
----- Original Message-----
From: Mildred Jackson [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 11:55 PM
To: Crisp, Dale
Subject: RE: FW: Johnsdale Road Sanitary Sewer Extension
See attachment with regard to letter written to Dale Crisp. If you ha
ve
question, please feel free to contact me.
> [Original Message]
> From: Crisp, Dale <[e-mail]>
> To: <[e-mail]>; Steve Mitchell
<[e-mail]>; John Dorney <[e-mail]>; Bob
Zarzecki <[e-mail]>
> Cc: Moyer, Jack <[e-mail]>; Brown, Chris
<[e-mail]>; Langston, Joe <[e-mail]>
> Date: 3/18/2002 4:30:39 PM
> Subject: FW: Johnsdale Road Sanitary Sewer Extension
> Bob / John / Steve:

Page 1
JohnsdaleRdSewerRaleigh03-22-02
> I called Macon Jackson by telephone today (876-0592) and I have adde
d =
> him to the e-mail address distribution above, so that he will know w
hat =
> is going on with this project.=20

> Bob, I mentioned your comment below, that he may want to include his
> comments in a letter or e-mail to you along with the PCN form that C
hris =
> and Joe with D&D have indicted they will get to you tomorrow (Tuesda
Y. =
> March 19th) for this project on the City's behalf.=20

> Macon, please copy all of us with any comments (letter or e-mail) th
at =
> you forward to the NCDWQ staff. Below is a chronology of e-mails =
> regarding our efforts since the Public Works Committee meeting last
> week, to get NCDWQ to approve the proposed sewer extension alignment
> that you and your neighbor has requested we submit to NCDWQ staff fo
r =
> their approval. Dale

> H. Dale Crisp, P.E.
> Raleigh Public Utilities Director
> (919)-890-3400 fax [phone]

Page 2
JohnsdaleRdSewerRaleigh03-22-02
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Crisp, Dale=20
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 9:04 AM
> To: 'Bob Zarzecki'
> Cc: John Dorney; Steve Mitchell; 'Brown, Chris'; 'Langston, Joe'
> Subject: RE: Johnsdale Road Sanitary Sewer Extension

> I have asked our consultants (Dewberry & Davis) to submit the form y
ou =
> indicated below.=20

> Since Bob can not meet on the 27th, John can you and / or Steve? Sin
ce =
> Macon Jackson talked with you John, I hope you can attend - you name
the =
> time. Dale

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Zarzecki [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 7:39 AM
> To: Crisp, Dale
> Cc: John Dorney; Steve Mitchell
> Subject: Re: Johnsdale Road Sanitary Sewer Extension

> Dale,
Page 3
JohnsdaleRdSewerRaleigh03-22-02
> We will be happy to review any alignment that you send in to us for
> review. Please be sure to use the PCN form when sending in for a =
> NW12/Neuse Buffer request. Also, please be sure to indicate any pas
t =
> Certifications or Authorization Certificates that have been applied
for =
> or received for the project. I have not seen the preliminary alignm
ent =
> that you spoke about in your email. Please be aware that any parall
el =
> impacts to Zone 2 (the outer 20 feet) of the buffer will require a =
> review for No Practical Alternatives. You will need to provide =
> justification for these impacts that demonstrates that avoidance or
> minimization of the impacts are not practicable alternatives. A let
ter =
> from Macon attached to the PCN may help in this review.
> Any parallel impacts to Zone 1 (the inner 30 feet) will require a sa
me =
> review and buffer mitigation per 15A NCAC 2B .0242. All parallel =
> impacts should be kept at least 10 feet away from the stream (25 fee
t in =
> High Quality Waters). Perpendicular crossings are exempt if you can
> keep them less than 40 feet wide (construction corridor) and no more
> than a 10 foot maintenance corridor. I'll be in meetings the rest o
f =
> the day and out all next week. You can try to reach me next Friday
if
> you like. I'll be on vacation on March 27th. You will have to work
Page 4
JohnsdaleRdSewerRaleigh03-22-02
> attendance at the meeting out with either John Dorney or Steve Mitch
ell. =
> I hope this information is helpful.
> - Bob

> John Dorney wrote:

> > bob zarzecki handles buffer issues. i doubt that he can get to th
is =
> before the end of next week since he and i (and others) are teaching
a =
> stream determination class all next week (plus there are plenty of i
tems =
> for him to handle which have come in long before this). thankx

> > "Crisp, Dale" wrote:

> > > Thanks Joe for getting these plans to John.

> > > John, this proposed sewer extension project has lead to some =
> property owner concerns that were discussed with our City Council an
d =
> has lead to the project being put on hold temporarily and placed in
the =
> City Council's Public Works Committee to resolve these concerns.

> > > One of the property owners, Macon Jackson, who I worked with at
USGS =
> before I joined DEM (now DWQ) over 20 years ago, insists that he has
Page 5
JohnsdaleRdSewerRaleigh03-22-02
> talked with you and that you indicated that you would consider allow
ing =
> us to align the proposed sewer main within the Neuse riparian buffer
. I =
> indicated to Macon and the other two property owners that we would =
> revise our proposed alignment and send it to you as a preliminary pl
an =
> to see if you will in fact approve this alignment. This is the propo
sed =
> alignment that Joe indicates below in his e-mail, has been delivered
to =
> your office today. We certainly hope that you can approve this =
> alignment, since it will resolve the property owners concerns and co
uld =
> be less expensive for the City to construct.

> > > Let us know what you think of this alignment. Contact Joe, Chris
=
> Jack or me if you have any questions. We are meeting with the proper
ty =
> owners again on March 27th and I request that you attend this meetin
g, =
> if this alignment can not be approved. Unless the property owners =
> (primarily Macon) hears this from you, I do not think he will believ
eus=
> frankly. We will be glad to meet anytime that day, at your office if
> necessary, to accommodate your schedule.

> > > Thanks John, look forward to hearing from you. Sorry to bother y
ou =
Page 6
JohnsdaleRdSewerRaleigh03-22-02
> with this small project, but the property owners, primarily Macon, _
> insisted on involving you directly in this matter. Dale

> > > H. Dale Crisp, P.E.
> > > Raleigh Public Utilities Director
> > > (919)-890-3400 fax [phone]

> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Langston, Joe [mailto:[e-mail]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 4:12 PM
> > > To: Crisp, Dale
> > > Cc: Moyer, Jack; Brown, Chris; King, Lance; Eakins, ion
> > > Subject: Johnsdale Road Sanitary Sewer Extension

> > > Dear Mr. Crisp:

> > > We have dropped off the preliminary alignment of the sanitary se
wer =
> extension (as discussed at yesterday's meeting with Chris Brown) to
Mr. _
> John Dorney with the Division of Water Quality. We have asked Mr. _
> Dorney for his review and comments on the alignment. We have sent y
ou =
Page 7
JohnsdaleRdSewerRaleigh03-22-02
> and Jack Moyer a copy of the letter and map also.

> > > Please let us know if you have any questions.
> > > Thanks,
> > > Joe Langston, P.E.
> > > Dewberry & Davis, Inc.
--- Mildred Jackson
--- [e-mail]
--- EarthLink: The #1 provider of the Real Internet.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Carolina
on of Water
y.doc
oft Word
nt
Name: North
Divisi
Qualit
Type: Micros
Docume
Page 8
.. , 11
JohnsdaleRdSewerRaleigh03-22-02
North Carolina Division of Water Quality.doc (appli
cation/msword)
Carolina
on of Water
y.doc
wnloaded with
e
Encoding: base64
Description: North
Divisi
Qualit
Download Status: Not do
messag
Page 9

Dewberry & Davis, I=. 8401 Arlington Boulevard
7 !
A Dewberry Company Fairfax, VA 22031-4666
If -r
VENDOR NO. 18803 No. 711429
INVOICE DATE INVOICE NO. DESCRIPTION GROSS AMOUNT DISCOUNT NET AMOUNT
03-07-2002 0203FEE $475.00 0.00 $475.00

0 V Z-

TOTAL:

0
$475.00 0

,, ... ?._
,..

" # i} 1~
x£1000 + + + ~agwnN alld 00 L ~ 00 9 L 00 ~ L pp+~ ~ 0~ 0 00+~ L OO+Z ~ 00+ l l 00+0 L `I'
}o a33NI0N3 NOIltl/~13SN00
0
}aayS i~33N19N3 OId3tlNi 0 08Z '
JMO't001£t000 S311Jlilfl OflBfld _ aweN x114 BuIMe~O _ o 0
8b'ASM a33NI0N3 d31H0 apo0 loalad I40 _ a
ZODZ ~,adnNdr ~S3af11tlN91S ''ff~ .~ry" D
area Og
'30Ntl1d300tl ltlNl3 Ol
C1310N Sd 2lOWd 030a003a 38 Ol 321tl S1N3W3Stl3 a3M3S J,21tl11NtlS aleog 0118(14 'ltlAOi~ddtl N3llIaM d8 03ZIi~OHlfltl SI 39NtlH0 d1 0
tl SS31Nf1 0311tl1SNl OS 38 lltlHS ONtl H0131tl~1 30 J.1.10 3dr aeu61se0 dCIS .(q atl0 _ o _
Hl ,l8 03AOaddtl N338 3ntlH S3WlI0tl3 3S3H1 3000 e •d~~ w
All 3H1 A8 0313103dS Stl S133a1S lltl NO 0310f1biSN00 - _ o N
38 Ol 3atl SdWtlN dtl010NtlH ONtl SNltlM301S ONIOf1lONl 'S3111110tl3 OllBfld a3H10 ON'd SN011'dll'd1SNl ,Wllln _ n _ _
ZZ17U1~ ~ ~Q ug --I
AlNO S3SOd~fld mm o ~ ~~ll ~ 06Z n
M31A3~ ~0~ e o ~
~l ZC'~V9 OZN+_ C ~O ~ ~ II Ut O
I ~ ~ No
di`l/"d~a' II N~ o fV cn
i ~!~+d }~~~+a ~I146 ~!la~d ~~ea ~ ~ J ~ o a~
~ CJ1 w
suo i rids o s ~1 !}oo,~ Pu sW~~ ,~QP~H ~1MI ~ _ ~I c° N
ol!gnd s,~}!~ ~ o} u~o}uoo Ilo4s }oefo~d s!y} ~o; Peen sPoy~ uogoru}siwa Wo I~~ e41 'uold ~y} a,Q uo uMOys so wa}s~(s ~aMes alpnd s~,Qrj ay} }o uolsus}xa puo uegoauuoo ay} o} s}uesuoo y6aloa yo ~ ayl O
o N
wa} S uolsua}x3-uol~~a11o0 ~aMaS _ _ _~4 _
D IlBfld °05'0 ~ dla «g 0 mr~i~D- _ _
ZZ- Z zz~ ~ ~A II ,v
~ .got ~.,~_II _cZcp
r 'L9 t D 0 ®dl0 ~8 3l 9ti
~ 05 __oz~ D t c O-N = ~ II ~N~ cz~ II of
Z II Ali ~ N p p N~ D
"ii ~ = gout j II N c _ D _ _ _ ~ _~o ~
r cs~M) No Z ~p ~ JOO ~
m m J~ ~ 2
v J a 30'ddg _ _ 00 DD ~ ~
sc e ~ a + 9NIlSIX3 m _ _ _ 2
~ ~'I~~S ~IHd~d~ n ~
Z~OIZ2i~t1 O ~
ZZ~~.~ m
D
'3i 0~ _ ~~ut i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~II~ _ Old
OZpv2
~ II ~N
_ B
09~ DB 0? Ol 0 Or N L N~^ ^ V, ~
- ~'I~~S ~IHd~H~ D
'I~Z~IOZI~OH ~ ~ _ Z w=
-t m _ _ _ D -z _
X~ r ~
L 0 -a D m
_ v -nm~ D D
~1/ Z _ _ _ _0 _ _ _ ~ r m v
D_~nm
09 rp , m OZ~
Z 99 66Z = 1(10 1 3/1N1 ~ . m _ - Z 98 66Z - NI 1 3Mll _ _ _
n V' - (30tld9 /M HS(ll3) ~Z'6l~ - Wld
Y! m _ _ D t t 6L+8 i 'diS
HW 19 _ _
OL
rn ~y6ia~eylo~f;i0 ay; ul ~~onn a~nanl woal uotsnpx3 alglssod
mN pue aul j e w ~Insaa pIM spaepue;S y8ra;ea~o ~f;i~;o uogeloi~ gay;o ~(ue ao `a;?s qop
~ 930 ~ 30 ~ 3~dd 'NOISN31X3 ~~Id4 3001d8,13M 031111 uo sue;d papiwaad aney '6n~d weaa;suMOp a;fie;sub `uoi;oadsu; ao; Ileo o~ 3bllllb'd
~ Z8E 2861/~Z/Z ~a31d0 ,lU INN3~1 aNd NOXIN 'SSb'8 ,l8 db'W d NOdR 43Sd8 ~~n31fld3d L5'L8Z=~3~3 aanlle; uogeogl;ou slyl;o;lnsaa a se pa;oadsul;ou sal~Illoe;~aMas
~ 'N011'4d3d0 9NIlll3~0d8 3H1 4333(18 t 3NOZ ,l8 d1 m 9NIdf10 330 031f1'dH 38 llb'HS lb'Id31'dW 031'dAd0X3 lld 'H0N3d1 3H1 301S38 03dO1S d3Ald 3Sf13N 3~OHNdW ~~d11NbS ONIISIX3 ~0 Wld ~o ~a;eM ~tue;o uol~elle;sula~ a~mbaa pue `sau~ ire;auoua;o aouensst aye ul;lnsa~
Jllidb'dOdW31 38 J~b'W ldld3ldW 031'dA'd0X3 ON `00+9 l NOIlb1S Ol 00+01 NOIld1S WOd3 '9 t ' ~NddWH~N38 ptnn `uo16on~~suo 6wuui6a o aouen a ui s uaw eda ~i o i ou o ~ q~ p. 1 p 0 l.0 y~ q ~,a l 3a/171b'd
',111db~10 403 NMOHS add S33d1 ll'd lON 'Sl •uol;one;suoo nays t;,
'SONIMdaO 3H1 NO 3SIMd3H10 NMOHS SS3lNf1 }o ~(ue 6uluul6aq o6 aolad savoy ~no~ ;uanq;seal 6e OOb£-068 6e 1N3W1?!b'd3a
30b'd9 9NIlSIX3 3H1 Ol b3db 038df11S10 3Hl 3dO1S3a ll'dHS d010b'd1N00 3Hl 'ti l S3111711l1 ~178~d aye PUe '0689-6£8 ~e 1N3W121bd30 JNRl33NIJN3
5~oz'o t to 8zso•zo to 1 5~oz•o < <0 6 3 lb'ZIlN3~ aye ug~ao; alglsuodsa~ sl `sueld asay; ul panoatlde SZ60'ZO l0 L N se '~annas pue ~a6enn ~o uolsua6xa ay6 ~o; atglsuodsa~ ~o;oe~;uo~ uogongsuo0 ayl
3 'NI'd1d00013 'dJl OOl 3Hl 301S1f10 4314001 ONd d3~3(19 Z 3NOZ w
Z6/~/~ 031'40 3Z~~00~81L~ l3Ndd 00013 'dW33 NO 4314001 SI 103r0ad 3H1 '~l d3~ld 3Sf13N N «oz•zsoo ~ 3
Z69L'~~~Ol N S2101~tRIlN00 NOIlN311b'
'H9131da 30 ,1110 3H1 J~8 0301110bd S3ZIS 3NIl d31'dM ONb' d3M3S ,ld'dllN'dS
9NI1SIX3 'b010'd81N00 3H1 J~8 3Nb08 38 llb'HS S3111111f1 039b'W'40 dlb'd38 a0 31b'0013d Ol 1S00 ' 6b6b-Z~9-008- l d31N30 ~1d0 3N0 N0110f1d1SN00 5889'9 l:Ol 3 ( )
30 ld'd1S Ol 401x4 S3111111f1 0NI1SIX3 lld Jlllb011d3A ONb' ,lll'd1NOZIdOH LL9Z'~~OOt N O f
H108 31'4001 ,1131b'df100'd Ol Alil181SNOdS3a S,d010'dd1N00 3Hl SI ll _ O
' 3 0314001 N338 3A'dH S3111111(1 ONIISIX3 ll'd 0~ 318tf11W1d N011'dWd03Nl 3H1 W08 Z l . ~
,J dY~l,-d12~
~ - S3W11 llb' 1'd 6L86'LIZOI 3 S) C
~ ~ ~ 03N1'd1Nl'4W 38 lldHS ObOa 3l'dOSNHOr 60L9 ON'4 SOL9 Ol SS300b' 3/11x4 ' l l 0~ ; 1951L886 N c~ ~ ~
~ ~ o ~ cn 'N0110f1a1SN00 9NIa(10 038df11S10 31 SN01110N00 d3J138 OL
cQ d n. 3 ~ n ~ d0 9NI1SIX3 Ol 013 S3X0811b'W SN91S lld 30YId3a/3a01S3a ll'dHS a010b'd1N00 Ol m~. ,oZ
~ m ~
~ m Z o '30449 1N3W3/1b'd , o.. na ~ l ,OZ ,Ol
(D 9NIlSIX3 H01b'W ll'dHS 133d1S NI 031'4001 Sa3A00 0Nd 9NIa 3lOHNb'W ll'd '6 _ .0 ~ N ~ ~~~}0 H1~ON
o co rn o 'N0110f1d1SN00 9NIdflO 038df11S10 31 SN01110N00 431138 d0 9NIlSIX3 Ol o ~ ~ 1N3W3St 1N3W3S'd3
3 ~ N 03Ab'dNfl d0 03Ab'd S3dld ,l'dM3Ald0 0Nd SJ.'4M3A180 l~'d aldd3a lldHS a010dd1N00 '8 N0110f181SNC ~ n NOIlOf1d1SN00
~ 0 p ,ld'ddOdW31 ,C ,d'ddOdW31 ,Oti
,llNO NOllb'Wd03Nl x03 co a co ~ NMOHS 0Nd 31dWIXOddd'd 3d'd SNOIlb'A313 40013 HSIN13 0N'd SN011'400~ 9N1011f18 'L 55
w ~ ~
~ ~ '133HS 1N3W3Sd3 d3M3S ,ldb'lII m d3M3S ,ldb'llNb'S
T ~ SIHl NO NMOHS ~ddWH0N38 ' L Z L 39b'd 096 l SddW 30 ~i008 NO 03Sd8 H1bON 1N3Nb'Wd3d ,OZ H9131b2 11 1 , ,OZ H9131b'd 30 J1110
sy ~ 'S 30 ~ 3944 NOISN31X3 3/1140 3901d8,13M 031111 2861/~Z/Z 03140 ,103NN3~i
x ~ ONd NOXIN SSdB A8 ddW d NO 03S'd8 Nb'dWH0N38 SIHl 'LS'L8Z=13 00+O1 'd1S 09 d33~f18 Z 3NOZ
ld 3lOHN'dW b3M3S J.d'dllN'dS 9NI1SIX3 30 Wid NO 03Sd8 SI lOd1N00 1d011a3A '9 d3~ld 3S(13N co S t
co ,OZ ` '~iaOM M3N 30 NOllb'1ld1SNl 9Nidf10 0341(1034 31 S3111~11f1 9NI1SIX3 4333(18 t 3NOZ ® ~ 3lOHNb'W d3M3S J~dd11NdS
~ 30 N011'd0013a 0Nb' 9NISSb'd1~8 llb' x03 3181SNOdS3d 38 ll'dHS i~010b'd1N00 3Hl 'S d3Ald 3Sf13N 'S'?I,'N d~i~ ~ZII~I~It~ ~ HddWHON38 ,ldddOdW31 HW 3lOHNb'W
d~a e ~ 39'dNl'dd4 WdOlS
io 'lOd1N00 NOISOd3 0N'd NOIld1N3W103S x03 OI d313W'd10 d3NNl b -SS SS- -ss Ss b3M3S ,lab'lINdS ~1S
N N0110f1d1SN00 9NIdf10 Jlab'SS303N Sb' S3df1S'd3W llb'1SN1 llb'HS d010b211N00 't W 333 NOIldA3l3 40013 43HSIN13
'0311d1SNl 38 Ol SI a3M3S d0a 3414 313a0N00 1N3W30a03N13d dw~ „a~ 3414 lb'13W 031b'Of1ba00 as ls3ao~ 3ixi° ~ ay~~
H01HM NI S1N3W3Sd3 a3M3S ,ld'411N'dS lld 8(149 ON'd db'310 ll'dHS 8010b2i1N00 ~ 6 ds dW0 3414 1d13W 03149(14400 (3NIl ~aa ls3ao~ ~
~ , J.1a3dOdd d0) A'dM-30-1H91d 3HtlM Ol0 D-+
•~niiHi~i~c~~a~u c ~~n~~nn Dui is n~nnuaaH ~ 1N3W3Sb'3 /1N1 1d3/1Nl . ~ , ~
JI 111\11\JUJU UJU V,UJI\II1V JI Il /\U VJIIV UUU\ _SS N0110f1diSN00 ul Adb'dOdW31 ,52 3dl GNnOJ 3dld NOaI idl urvi iw Baia ivva 1 r- 6o` r
SV iN3W3SV3 N0110f1diSN00 ,,dV80 W3i 3Hi dV310 IIVHS 8OlO"iN00 Z ~7J 3NIl iN3W3SV3 1N3NdINd3d = z
OL dl4 3dld N08I 3Tiona o v '80 IlIHN3AVN 3ON33 o n
cn -v m 1=1 SOadOMdiS H0131d8 30 AID 11'd H11M 30NV(18000V 1018iS NI 38 11dHS IV183iVV4 OMd Noiion8iSN00 -nV 'L N01 NOUVIA32388V NOIldIbOS3a - A m
z ~ m ZZb9 ZI2OI 3 (D > > - - Z986'8286 N M3N ONUSIX3 NOIldNOS30 v 0
(D (D MIS
co CD 0 1 N V:13N3 P co N , 8 N Ilb'l/1 N3 3l a2A`ddNdl D

TAN D ARD ~ ~ ~
LE END TA DA D BBR EV IATI N ENE ~ ~ o L N T
SITE o - - ~ ~ DESCRIPTION EXISTING NEW N 98 N 9838.9862 - c c a~
o DESCRIPTION ABBREVIATION E 10 E 10312.6422 'rn ~ Z 1. ALL CONSTRUCTION AND MATERIAL SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL ~ ~ ~
0 o FENCE -x- x -x - RAVENHILL DR. z DUCTILE IRON PIPE CITY OF RALEIGH STANDARDS. N w ~ N 70
_ ~ PERMANENT EASEMENT LINE DIP 35' TEMPORARY
° ~ IRON PIPE FOUND IPF 35 TEMI ~N• IRON PIPE FOUND .~PF CONSTF 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR THE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AS ~ CONSTRUCTION ,
INVERT INV ~ a OLD WAKE RIGHT-OF-WAY (OR PROPERTY APPROVED BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE. EASEMENT
o FOREST Ro. LINE) CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CMP 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR AND GRUB ALL SANITARY S W R
spR/ ~ REST RD Nc F DIXIE FO CORRUGATED METAL PIPE 4z cMP REINFORCEMENT CONCRETE PIPE RCP E E EASEMENTS IN WHICH SEWER IS TO BE INSTALLED.
~RFS FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATI N rR SANITARY SEWER ss ss- -SS SS- 0 FFE c~
~ INNER DIAMETER 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL MEASURES AS NECESSARY DURING CONSTRUCTION N
STORM DRAINAGE ~e RcP ID FOR SEDIMENTATION AND EROSION CONTROL. rn
MANHOLE MH TEMPORARY BENCHMARK ~ NEUSE RIVER IV R r E 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL BYPASSING AND RELOCATION OF °0
VICINITY MAP N.T. S. © ZONE 1 BUFFER SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE 0 BUFFER EXISTING TI IT ~ U L IES IF REQUIRED DURING INSTALLATION OF NEW WORK.
rn , T
NEUSE RIVER 6. VERTICAL CONTROL IS BASED ON RIM OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE AT ~
ZONE 2 BUFFER 60 STA. 10+00 EL=287.57. THIS BENCHMARK BASED ON A MAP Y B BASS NIXON AND x
CITY OF RALEIGH 20~ PERMANENT KENNEDY DATED 2/23/1982 TITLED: WEYBRIDGE DRIVE EXTENSION, PAGE 3 OF 5. ~ c~
SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT NORTH BASED ON BOOK OF MAPS 1960 PAGE 121. BENCHMARK r ~ , SHOWN ON THIS ~ o SHEET. ~
~ rn
SS 7. BUILDING LOCATIONS AND FINISH F ~ ~ M LOOR ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHOWN ~
40~ TEMPORARY - FOR INFORMATION ONLY. ~ ~
CONSTRUCTION 0 0 ~ ~
EASEMENT 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ALL DRIVEWAYS AND DRIVEWAY PIPES, PAVED OR UNPAVED, ~ cv E ` TO EXISTING OR BETTER CONDITIONS IF DISTURBED DURING CONSTRU TIN ` ^ o
NORT H C 0. ocs,rno
SS SS _ o N ~ L 9. ALL MANHOLE RING AND COVERS LOCATED IN STREET SHALL MATCH EXISTING ~ ~ L vU m
PAVEMENT GRADE. ~ m m ~ mZ c3
~ 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE REPLACE ALL SIGNS MAILBOXES ETC. TO EXISTING OR ~ U r °
/ r~ BETTER CONDITIONS IF DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. A ~ ~ Q-
40 p m N N 9887.1561 ~ ~ ~ o
a 11. DRIVE ACCESS TO 6705 AND 6709 JOHNSDALE ROAD SHALL BE MAINTAINED ~ ~ E 10217.9879 AT ALL TIMES.
ii,
~s 30 12. ALL EXISTING UTILITIES HAVE BEEN LOCATED FROM THE INF
O ORMATION AVAILABLE. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ACCURATELY LOCATE BOTH
0 N 10043.2677 HORIZONTALLY AND VERTICALLY ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO START OF
E 10136.6885 CONSTRUCTION ONE CALL CENTER 1-800-632-4949. COST TO RELOCATE OR ~ )
REPAIR DAMAGED UTILITIES SHALL BE BORNE BY THE CONTRACTOR. EXISTING
ATTENTION CONTRACTORS SANITARY SEWER AND WATER LINE SIZES PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF RALEIGH.
N 10333.7692 E 10092.2041
Th n r NEl e Co st uction Contractor responsible for the extension of water and sewer, as ZOI 13. THE PROJECT IS LOCATED ON FEMA FLOOD PANEL 37183 Y NEUSE RIVER C0332E DATED 3/3/92
approved in these plans, is responsible for contacting the CENTRAL N 10102.0928 ZONE 2 BUFFER AND LOCATED OUTSIDE THE 100 YR. FLOODPLAIN. ~
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT at 831-6810 and the PUBLIC UTILITIES E 10110.2035 14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE THE DISTURBED AREA TO THE EXISTING GRADE
DEPARTMENT at 890-3400 at least twent four hours rior to be innin an of Y p 9 9 Y UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS.
their construction. ,
r, 15. NOT ALL TREES ARE SHOWN FOR CLARITY.
FAILURE to notify both City Departments in advance of beginning Construction, will BENCHMARK. ,3 result in the issuance of monetary fines, and require reinstallation of any water or RIM OF N ' 3 16. FROM STATION 10+00 TO STATION 16+00, NO EXCAVATED MATERIAL MAY BE TEMPORARILY
EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE EUSE RIVER sewer facilities not inspected as a result ofthis notification failure. ELEV=287.57 REPUTEDLY BASED- UPOiV" A MAP BY ZONE 1 BUFFER STORED BESIDE THE TRENCH. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL HA S LL BE HAULED OFF DURING
THE BACKFILLING OPERATION. 0
BASS, NIXON AND KENNEDY DATED: 2/23/1982 FAILURE to call for Inspection, Install a Downstream Plug, have Permitted Plans on TITLED: WEYBRIDGE DRIVE EXTENSION, PAGE 3 OF 5 z
Job site, or any other Violation of City of Raleigh Standards will result in a Fine and _0 ~ m
Possible Exclusion from future work in the City of Raleigh. w
70
6' I MH STA 15+79.11
RIM = 319.24 FLUSH W GRADE Q
- ( / ) W - 1NVE T IN - 29.9.86. Q U
320 1NVE T OUT - 299.66 Z W Z
60 6o W J
w n W ~ ~ ~ w w
0 Q Q ~Z V
o: c~ ~ ~ W LL
W L 1
3 3 ~ J F- X
2 M V1 0) _ ~ Z - Q W
Jr~ HORIZONTAL Z ~ 2 r
_ GRAPHIC SCALE Q v N O U
oaoN II N +o o zo ~ so 1eo ~ rn~ II
II _ _ ~ N~.I~ ~
4 _ °?O 2roZ0
~+M 310 ~ u~~ 0 0! o' ~+M _ ~ II ~ ~ (W FEET )
Q~» 0 ~ ~ 1 inch = 40 ft.
w
o! w _ _
~ U VERTICAL ~~w
U ~ _ = EXISTING GRAPHIC SCAL ~ _ W
~ ~ GRADE_ 4 0 2 4 8~ 16
_ ~ ao
~ r ~ •rn o! oo Q ~ N W W
H ~O~p 3 N _ Z (IN FEET) ~ J
Q ~N o II ~ aNO ~ • `n II ~ _ Q 1 inch - 4 fiL
j~ II ~ ~ _ Z
3NcD II ~ = N?O ~ Z ~ _ ~ I-,, h. _ " 167.46 LF 8 DIP ~ 0.50 o Q
300 =+N_o o II ~ ww Q 106.21 LF
~p~~ - - ~ a - ~
~ ww ~ ~zz _ Z
~~~zz "...DIP ~ 0.50% a PUBLIC Q
5° N ~ - Sewer Collection-Extension System (n
o N ~P The City of Raleigh consents to the connection and externion of the City's public sewer system as shown on
1 ~ N LO / _ this plan. The material and constnucton methods used for this project shall conform to the City's Pubik;
~ O Util'rfies Handbook's standards and specifications:
air io N City of Ralegh
ti ~N II v Publ'~c Utilities Departm~t Permit ~
~ II Construction Approval
~ ~ pip ~ =+NZ° 52 LF
7 ~ 0 64. , Dote
290 _ ww NOT FOR .a, sa~~ii,
• ~-zz " DI ' - CONSTRUCT( N 0
D - UTILITY INSTALLATIONS AND OTHER PUBLIC FACILITIES, yW
N O m INCLUDING SIDEWALKS AND HAN I AP ~ ` ' ~i~ D C RAMPS ARE TO BE
m o- o CONSTRUCTED ON ALL STREETS AS SPECIFIED BY THE CITY CODE. THESE FACILITIES HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY FM~"¢'""r"`'~
CITY OF RALEIGH AND SHALL BE SO (INSTALLED UNLESS A CAD by SDP Designer JPE
1P Q CHANGE IS AUTHORIZED BY WRffTEN APPROVAL. PUBLIC Scale
m ~ SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTS ARE TO IBE RECORDED PRIOR AS NOTED
Q ~6 TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE.
2~ m 3 _ r...:. Date slcNAruRES: JANUARY 2002
DDI Project Code
CHIEF ENGINEER WSVAR
Drawing File Name Pueuc UTILITIES 00013LC01.DWG
280 /
TRAFFIC ENGINEER Sheet
1 CONSERVATION ENGINEER
10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15+ 15+00 16+00 17+00 File Number of
00013L

6 - ~ fp to i ~
TANDARD LE END N TANDARD ABBREVIATI _ ENERAL N TE
SATE o _ N 98 N 9838.9862 _
~ ~ DESCRIPTION EXISTING NEW \ E 10 W - DESCRIPTION ABBREVIATION E 1031.2.6422 ~ cad ~ 1. ALL CONSTRUCTION AND MATERIAL SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL t j a ~
Q ° ~ ~ FENCE - x - x - X ~ CITY OF RALEIGH STANDARDS. N 70
RAVENHILL DR. ~ ~ Z = DUCTILE IRON PIPE DIP ~ r ~ PERMANENT EASEMENT LINE 35' TEMI ~ ~ 35 TEMPORARY /
~ ~ iPF IRON PIPE FOUND IPF ~ _ CONSTF 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR THE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AS - CONSTRUCTION SS-
~N• IRON PIPE FOUND ~ INVERT INV EA APPROVED BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE. .EASEMENT ~ - ~
a OLD WAKE RIGHT-OF-WAY (OR PROPERTY v FoRESr RD. LINE CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CMP 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEAR AND GRUB ALL SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTS IN WHICH
o ) SEWER IS TO BE INSTALLED.
~ORi ~ pRESj 42" cMP REINFORCEMENT CONCRETE PIPE RCP Ns F D4XIE F CORRUGATED METAL PIPE ~ / M
~RFS _ FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION FFE / NTRA T R N / i-- ~ 4. CO C 0 SHALL INSTALL MEASURES AS NECESSARY DURING CONSTRUCTION ~2o FOR SEDIMENTATION AND ER SIN NTR rn
l Ra SANITARY SEWER ss ss- -SS ss p to RcP INNER DIAMETER ID 'S2 STORM DRAINAGE \ ~ 0 0 CO OL. r ~
MANHOLE MH NEUS ER 1VER 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL BYPASSING AND RELOCATION OF co
TEMPORARY BENCHMARK ~ _ 0 r - _ VI~iNIT~ MAP N.T.S. --~oNE 1 BUFFER BUFFER - ~ ~ EXISTING UTILITIES IF REQUIRED DURING INSTALLATION OF NEW WORK.
SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE O © ~ 0- 15
NEUSE-RIVER - 6. VERTICAL CONTROL IS BASED ON RIM OF EXISTING SANITARY R MANH AT ~ SEWE OLE
~ ZONE 2 BUFFER 6 STA. 10+00 EL=287.57. THIS BENCHMARK BASED ON A MAP EtY BASS NIXON AND o x
\ i,. KENNEDY DATED 2/23/1982 TITLED: WEYBRIDGE DRIVE EXTENSION, PAGE 3 OF 5. ~ ro
CITY OF RALEIGH 20' PERMANENT SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT NORTH BASED ON BOOK OF MAPS 1960 PAGE 121. BENCHMARK SHOWN ON THI ~ LL' S ~ a~ SHEET.
~ ~ ~ ~ / 308 ~ ; / ~ '7 ~
\3 ~ ~ 10 ~ ~ ~ N M x ~ ? 7. BUILDING LOCATIONS AND FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHOWN _ ~
~ ~ ' ~ 303... ~ 40 TEMPORARY / ~ x Sot ~ FOR INF )RMATI N N Y ~ ~ ~ ~ / C 0 0 L. ~
~ \ TI 3p CONSTRUC 01~ x ,i / 0 o co / 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR ALL DRIVEWAYS AND DRIVEWAY PIPES PAVED OR UNPAVED ~ ~ cv o0 E
~ \ EASEM N ~ ~ ~ TO EXISTING OR BETTER CONDITIONS IF DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION: o ~ ~ ~
2gp ORTH o t~ ~
o / c,5 N \ 20 55 ~ EN"~ 9. ALL MANHOLE RING AND COVERS LOCATED IN STREET SHALL MATCH EXISTING ~ ~ ~V
o - ~ \ ,i ~ ' PAVEMENT GRADE. m ~Z ~ 3
r-- ~ X 04 ` . s 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE REPLACE ALL SIGNS MAILBOXES ETC. TO EXISTING OR ~ U r r ~ r / , r
\ 20' ' ~ 1~ BETTER CONDITIONS IF DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. A ~ a o~ ~
- ~ c~ m N 9887.1561
ao S \ 296X 0 11. DRIVE ACCESS TO 6705 AND 6709 JOHNSDALE ROAD SHALL BE MAINTAINED ~ ~ ~ E 10217.9879 / ~ AT ALL TIMES.
-
i ~ 3 / 12. ALL EXIS'~ING UTILITIES HAVE BEEN LOCATED FROM THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE.
30 ~ o r ~ IT IS THE: CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO ACCURATELY LOCATE BOTH
10 \ N 10 3.2677 HORIZONTALLY AND VERTICALLY ALL EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO START OF
E 1~3~85 ~ / i / CONSTRUCTION (ONE CALL CENTER 1-800-632-4949). COST TO RELOCATE OR
\ / / -I REPAIR DAMAGED UTILITIES SHALL BE BORNE BY THE CONTRACTOR. EXISTING
j SANITARY SEWER AND WATER LINE SIZES PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF RALEIGH.
ATTENTION CONTRACTORS ~ - ~ N 10333.7692 ~ --J-- / p0 13. THE PROJECT IS LOCATED ON FEMA FLOOD PANEL 71 AT
' 10092.2041 ~ ~ ` NE NEU E RIVER 3 83C0332E D ED 3/3/92 AND LOCATED OUTSIDE THE 100 YR. FLOODPLAIN. ~
The Construction Contractor responsible for the extension of water and sewer, as \ N 10102.0928 NE 2 BUFFER ~
approved in these plans, is responsible for contactin the CENTRAL \ / E 10110.2035 14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE THE DISTURBED AREA TO THE EXISTING GRADE
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT at 831-6810, and the PUBLIC UTILITIES ~ ~ DEPARTMENT at 890-3400 at least fwent four hours prior to beginning any of ~ r 320 UNLESS .SHOWN OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS.
their construcfion. 15. NOT ALL TREES ARE SHOWN FOR CLARITY.
,gyp ~ ~ _ _ ~ / ~
i - - -----300 - - ' , ~ _ ~ / FAILURE to notify both City Departments in advance of beginning Construction, will BE~HMARK. ~ i i ~ 16. FROM STATION 10+00 TO STATION 16+00, NO EXCAVATED MATERIAL MAY BE TEMPORARILY
result in the issuance of monetary fines, and require reinstallation of any wateror RIM OF EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE NEUSE. RIVER STORED BESIDE THE TRENCH. ALL EXCAVATED MATERIAL SHALL BE HAULED OFF DURING ~
sewer facilities not ins ctedasaresultofthisnotificationfailure. - ELEV=287.57 REPUTEDLY BASED UPON A MAP BY . ZONE T BUF ~ THE BACKFILLING OPERATION. 0
BASS, NIXON AND KENNEDY 1A ED_2/23/4982 / ~ z °-T
II D wnstream Piu have Permitted Plans on TITLED:~YBl~i6GE~RIVE EX E SION P7~GE 3-6F ~ ~ FAILURE to call for Inspect?on, Insta a o g, _ ~m
Job site, or any other Violation of City of Raleigh Standards will result in a Fine and ~ W
Possible Exclusion from future work in the Cit of Ralei h. ~ - Y 9 ~ - ~ _
_ _ -
70
6' I M H Q STA 15+79.11 Q
RIM = 319.24 FLUSH W GRADE W ( / )
I IN _ 29~J.88 Z
_ _ INVE T OUT = 299.66 W Z W ~
320 so 60 W ~ ~ ~ w
w o ^ i W J ~
a ~ Z a Q
c~ ~ ~ W ~ ~ Q W
Q ~ O ~ J
3 3 ~ X Z - Q
_ ~ ~ rn =M 1lJ~' cn rn HORIZONTAL Z ~
J~~ ~~OD GRAPHIC SCALE Q
v~N ~ ~ N U rn
_ _ _ _ OuON p (~J ~ 0 20 40 80 160 ~ t0 ~
. ~ II Nu7ll~
r o. 4 =+M?° 2r~Z0
(IN FEET ) II ~ ~ 1 inch = 40 it.
310 0~ II~~ D
o; ~cn~??
w ~ o VERTICAL
W U J GRAPHIC SCALE ~
~ ~ _ EXISTING. W
~ _ GRADE 4 0 2 4 8 18
z ~
~ aor Q orn W W Z
w ~ ~N ( III FEET) v? Q
Q ON II _ 7i ~ ~ .III ~ _ _ _ 1 inch = 4 ft.
~ II ~ ~ M Z LL
N c0 8» DIP ® 0.50 a Q 67.46 LF 1 Q
~ Z ~ ~ f- F- 300 = ° o II ~ ~ J 106.21 LF ~ I~
~ ww ~II~~ _ 0.
~ ww ~ w-~~y> Z » ~ 0:50% PUBLIC
o ~~~Zz 8 DIP Q Sewer Collection-Extension S tem
cn / ~ °~o X51
0 o ~P The Cty of Raleigh consents to the connectron and extension of the qty's public sewer system as shown on
c~ 1 ~ this pbn. The material and constnrction methods used fa this project shall conform to the C'ty's Pubilc Utilities Hondtxlok's standords and specifications:
v ~ ~ ~
,r ~ ~ ~N 1 ~ qtr City of Raleigh
~ N Public Utilities Deportment Permit ~
~ II m III Constnlction Approval
O~ ~ T m Z ~ l.F 't.;
=+N-O 64.52 Dote NOT FOR
~ II ~ 290 ° ww
" DI CONSTRUCTION
m ~cn~?? 8 r . 3 II UTILITY INSTALLATIONS AND OTHER PUBLIC FACILITIES,
N INCLUDING SIDEWALKS AND HANDICAP RAMPS ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON ALL STREETS AS SPECIFIED BY THE CITY
m CODE. THESE FACILITIES HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY THE
~ o CITY OF RALEIGH AND SHALL BE SO INSTALLED UNLESS A CAD by SDP Designer JPE
n ~ _ C O1` Q7 CHANGE IS AUTHORIZED BY WRITTEN APPROVAL. PUBLIC Scale
E c SANffARY SEWER EASEMENTS ARE TO BE RECORDED PRIOR AS NOTED TO FlNAL ACCEPTANCE.
m O Date
Q ~j2' i 2 m sIGNATURES: JANUARY 2002
nnl Prniert Cnde
CHIEF ENGINEER WSVAR
Drawing File Name
PUBLIC UTILITIES 00013LC01.DWG
280 TRAFFIC ENGINEER Sheet
of 1 CONSERVATION ENGINEER
10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 15- 15+00 16+00 17+00 File Number 00013L