HomeMy WebLinkAbout710084_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20190125Facility Number - L'1 V DIVISIOn of Soil and Water
0 Other Agency
Reason for Visit: 0 Routine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral Zmergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: 1 Arrival Time: L.)() ] DepartureTime: County: l RegionwLEL
Farm Name: _ '� rl/" �,YY \ Owner Email:
Owner
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact:
Onsite Representative: �s-"Y� {� knwlo
Certified Operator:
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Boars
Other
Other
Phone:
Title:
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator:
Certification Number:
Certification Number:
Longitude:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
dI INon-Layer
Design Current
Dry Poultry Canacitv Poo.
Layers
Non -Layers
Pullets
Turkeys
Turkey Poults
Other
Discharges and Stream Impacts
I. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
Discharge originated at ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other: _
a. Was the conveyance man-made?
b. Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR)
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? _
d. Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR)
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters
of the State other than from a discharge?
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dairy Cow
Dairy Calf
Dairy Heifer
Dry Cow
Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
❑ Yes 9No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Page I of 3
21412015 Continued
Facili Number: Date of Inspection: #4m
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? Yes [—]No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure 1 Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: 1 % 3
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes kNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ Yes ZNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any of questions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? [—]Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes � No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s):
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
the appropriate box.
Yes [—]No ❑ NA NE
Yes ❑ No ❑ NA j�J° NE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA WNE
❑ NA NE
❑ NA NE
❑ NA 4NE
❑ NA � �I;NE
❑WUP []Checklists❑Design ❑Maps ❑ Lease Agreements ❑Other:
�`
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
ElWaste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard ❑ Waste Analysis ❑ Soil Analysis ❑ Waste Transfers ❑ West er Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and V Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [—]No
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NArNE
E
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA
Page 2 of 3 21412015 Continued
H'acili Number: Date of Ins ection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA 9NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ��V NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA lE
❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA Z NE
■ - ►7
❑ Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes [—]No
[—]Yes No
❑ Yes No
❑NA ❑NE
❑ NA
VNE
❑ NA
�NE
❑NA
❑NE
❑ NA
❑ NE
Iwnunems truer to question o/: Lxpiam any r rs answers anutor any aamttonat recommenuations or any other comments.
Use drawings of facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary). I
- �,✓� v t -ham �, &��L� 4 c, StyV (+tx_4 t>VC tt' ,
JAAA
r �Gllre� �11�►'lw>e bf d u n, vw s�5i.s O`C PVC Je a'y—
usG cw�v Cif 4yie_
W( 1�y Ovn a(aa w� r l^�l�tGuvtf (,s't; ar�
(�iwGfttrcf
Dw��v oG�a c� ��; I� ( y wG�� nqe�f
I P w I �lI„� ck 4-6G� �1A I '71f A - M4 JZ 4vk.A%kd� Sri l�l t/I -u
Reviewer/Inspector Name:
Reviewer/Inspector Signature:
Page 3 of 3
'hL G / Phone:
Date: f1 Z$
214120 5