20181609 Ver 1_PJD Request_20181121

Preliminary Jurisdictional
Determination Request

SoVA Mega Site at Berry Hill – Phase I Water, North Carolina

Rockingham County, North Carolina

August 24, 2018

Submitted For:
City of Eden
ATTN: Brad Corcoran
P.O. Box 70
Eden, North Carolina 27289
336-623-2110
[e-mail]
Submitted To:
U.S.A.C.E., Wilmington District
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
ATTN: David Bailey
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
[e-mail]

Submitted By:
Dewberry
551 Piney Forest Road
Danville, Virginia 24540
434-797-4497

Page 1 of 3

August 24, 2018

United States Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
ATTN: David Bailey
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587

RE: Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Request
SoVA Mega Site at Berry Hill – Phase I Water North Carolina
Rockingham County, NC

Dear Mr. Bailey:

On July 5 and 17, 2018, Dewberry Engineers Inc. (Dewberry) conducted a wetland and
Waters of the U.S. (WOUS) investigation along the proposed SoVA Mega Site at Berry Hill
– Phase I waterline alignment route. Approximately 26,138 linear feet of the proposed
route was investigated for wetland and WOUS.

The project site is located in Rockingham County, North Carolina. The southern section
of the project begins at the Dry Creek crossing located along US-311/NC-770
(36.523503°N, -79.686749°W), and parallels US-311/NC-770 to the north-northeast to
the North Carolina – Virginia border (36.541536°N, -79.629052°W).

Figure 1 provides an aerial view of the project route.

DELINEATION FINDINGS

The methods used to identify jurisdictional WOUS, including wetlands, were those set
forth in the 1987 USACE Wetland Delineation Manual (Y-87-I) and the Regional
Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains
and Piedmont Region (ERDC/EL TR-12-9). Prior to the site visit, Dewberry conducted
an online investigation of the property reviewing federal and state databases that provide
information regarding the site characteristics of the subject property. During the site
visit, Dewberry traversed the project route identifying wetland and WOUS. Where
appropriate, field staff collected and recorded soil profiles, observed and recorded the
vegetation and hydrology of each wetland type. WOUS and wetlands located within
project area were flagged in the field with survey ribbon.

Mr. David Bailey
SoVA Mega Site PJD
August 24, 2018

Page 2 of 3

The USGS Northeast Eden, NC-VA 2016 quadrangle map was initially used to decipher
information on topography and stream channels prior to the site visit and is provided as
Figure 2. The USGS topographic map shows the site as consisting of a roadway corridor
including forest, pasture and residential property.

The National Wetland Inventory (NWI) map was generated from the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service Wetland Mapper and is provided as Figure 3. The NWI map was used
to help identify mapped wetlands prior to the site visit. The online NWI map illustrated
riverine systems and freshwater forested/shrub wetlands. The field delineation revealed
the presence of streams and wetlands. The enclosed Preliminary Jurisdictional Request
provides a summary of the WOUS and wetlands identified within the project route.
Wetland determination forms are provided in Appendix A.

The Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey for Rockingham County
was used as a resource to assist with identifying and classifying soil types present at the
site prior to the site visit and is included as Figure 4. The digital Soil Survey Map labels
the soil on-site within the project area as being:
• (BaB) Banister loam, 0-4% slopes, rarely flooded
• (CmB) Clover sandy loam, 2-8% slopes
• (CmD) Clover sandy loam, 8-15% slopes
• (CsA) Codorus loam, 0-2% slopes, frequently flooded
• (DaA) Dan River loam, 0-2% slopes, frequently flooded
• (LeB) Leaksville silt loam, 0-4% slopes
• (Pt) Pits, clay
• (SpB) Spray loam, 0-5% slopes
• (SvE) Stoneville loam, 15-25% slopes
• (YaB) Yadkin loam, 2-8% slopes
Of the above listed soils, (CsA) Codorus loam, (DaA) Dan River loam and (LeB) Leaksville
silt loam are considered hydric soils in Rockingham County.

The delineated WOUS boundaries were located with a Trimble GPS and are shown on the
wetland exhibit included as Appendix B of this report. Photographs of the site are
provided as Appendix C.

Mr. David Bailey
SoVA Mega Site PJD
August 24, 2018

Page 3 of 3

Dewberry requests a USACE preliminary jurisdictional determination of the delineated
area described above. Please contact me at [e-mail] or 434-549-8494 to set
a date and time to meet at the site for confirmation.

Sincerely,

Dewberry Engineers Inc.

Briana L. Bill, PWS, PWD
Senior Environmental Scientist

Troy A. Shelton, PWS, PWD
Environmental Department Manager
Senior Environmental Scientist

BLB\tas\blb

Enclosures

P:\50102913\Tech\Envir\PJD\2018.8.9 SoVA Mega Site Waterline PJD Request.docx
Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A.REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B.NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD:
C.DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D.PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: County/parish/borough: City:
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.:Long.:
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody:
E.REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH “MAY BE”SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non-wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource “may be”
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
5BCMF
DPOUJOVFE
SA 36.5235350°-79.6868739°17LF non-wetland may be subject Section 10/404
SB 36.5235809°-79.6868662°5LF non-wetland may be subject Section 10/404
SC 36.5297743°-79.6767481°113LF non-wetland may be subject Section 10/404
SD 36.5305934° -79.6758778°14LF non-wetland may be subject Section 10/404
SE 36.5309725° -79.6594010°45LF non-wetland may be subject Section 10/404
SF 36.5317708°-79.6499836°43LF non-wetand may be subject Section 10/404
August 24, 2018
Dewberry, ATTN: Briana Bill, 551 Piney Forest Rd., Danville VA 24540
Raleigh Field Office
NC Rockingham Eden
36.531388 -79.651941
17S 620680mE 4043734mN
Cascade Creek, Dry Creek

“”
1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring “pre-
construction notification” (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant’s acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit)or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there “may be” waters of the U.S. and/or that there “may be”navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale: _______BBBBBBBBBBBB.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps: ________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
Corps navigable waters’ study: ____________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: ________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
USGS NHD data.
USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: _________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: __________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: ________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
State/local wetland inventory map(s): ____________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
FEMA/FIRM maps: ________________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
100-year Floodplain Elevation is: ____BBBBBBBBBBBB.(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: Aerial (Name & Date): ______BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
or Other (Name & Date): ______BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter: __________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
Other information (please specify): ______________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member person requesting PJD
completing PJD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.
_SoVA Mega Site at Berry Hill - Phase I Water NC Wetland Exhibit
1:24,000, NORTHEAST EDEN, NC-VA 2016
Soil Map - Rockingham County, NC
UFWS NWI Mega Park Waterline
USGS NORTHEAST EDEN, NC-VA 2016
Site Photographs, July 2018
Figure 1
Aerial Project Area Map

Figure 1: Aerial Project Area MapSoVA Mega Site at Berry Hill – Phase I Water NCRockingham County, North CarolinaGoogle Earth: Imagery Date 5/2/201737.70839°N, -77.43283°W37.71270°N, -77.43346°WProject Coordinates36.531388°-79.651941
Figure 2
Topographic Project Area Map

Figure 2: Topographic Project Area MapSoVA Mega Site at Berry Hill – Phase I Water NCRockingham County, North CarolinaUSGS Topographic Quadrangle: Northeast Eden, NC-VA 2016Project Route
Figure 3
National Wetland Inventory Map

Figure 4
NRCS Web Soil Survey

Soil Map—Rockingham County, North Carolina
(SoVA Mega Site at Berry Hill - Phase I Water NC)
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
8/9/2018
Page 1 of 440416004042300404300040437004044400404510040458004041600404230040430004043700404440040451004045800617000617700618400619100619800620500621200621900622600623300
617000 617700 618400 619100 619800 620500 621200 621900 622600 623300
36° 33' 5'' N 79° 41' 47'' W36° 33' 5'' N79° 37' 9'' W36° 30' 39'' N
79° 41' 47'' W36° 30' 39'' N
79° 37' 9'' WN
Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 17N WGS84
0 1500 3000 6000 9000
Feet
0 450 900 1800 2700
Meters
Map Scale: 1:31,700 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet.
MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Area of Interest (AOI)
Soils
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed Depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial Water
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spot
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Background
Aerial Photography
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857)
Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Rockingham County, North Carolina
Survey Area Data: Version 18, Oct 3, 2017
Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or larger.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Mar 27, 2015—Oct
16, 2017
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Soil Map—Rockingham County, North Carolina
(SoVA Mega Site at Berry Hill - Phase I Water NC)
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
8/9/2018
Page 2 of 4
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
BaB Banister loam, 0 to 4 percent
slopes, rarely flooded
332.0 10.2%
CmB Clover sandy loam, 2 to 8
percent slopes
275.9 8.5%
CmD Clover sandy loam, 8 to 15
percent slopes
266.2 8.2%
CmE Clover sandy loam, 15 to 25
percent slopes
144.9 4.4%
CnB2 Clover sandy clay loam, 2 to 8
percent slopes, moderately
eroded
54.4 1.7%
CnD2 Clover sandy clay loam, 8 to
15 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
24.8 0.8%
CnE2 Clover sandy clay loam, 15 to
25 percent slopes,
moderately eroded
213.4 6.5%
CpC Clover-Urban land complex, 2
to 10 percent slopes
14.0 0.4%
CsA Codorus loam, 0 to 2 percent
slopes, frequently flooded
55.0 1.7%
DaA Dan River loam, 0 to 2 percent
slopes, frequently flooded
186.4 5.7%
LeB Leaksville silt loam, 0 to 4
percent slopes
493.5 15.1%
PnC Pinkston fine sandy loam, 6 to
15 percent slopes
3.9 0.1%
Pt Pits, clay 137.7 4.2%
SpB Spray loam, 0 to 5 percent
slopes
398.1 12.2%
SuB Spray-Urban land complex, 0
to 5 percent slopes
10.6 0.3%
SvB Stoneville loam, 2 to 8 percent
slopes
182.1 5.6%
SvD Stoneville loam, 8 to 15
percent slopes
156.2 4.8%
SvE Stoneville loam, 15 to 25
percent slopes
111.4 3.4%
Ur Urban land 10.3 0.3%
W Water 28.2 0.9%
WhB Wickham sandy loam, mesic, 1
to 4 percent slopes, rarely
flooded
70.1 2.1%
YaB Yadkin loam, 2 to 8 percent
slopes
95.0 2.9%
Soil Map—Rockingham County, North Carolina SoVA Mega Site at Berry Hill - Phase I Water NC)
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
8/9/2018
Page 3 of 4
Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI
Totals for Area of Interest 3,264.0 100.0%
Soil Map—Rockingham County, North Carolina SoVA Mega Site at Berry Hill - Phase I Water NC)
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
National Cooperative Soil Survey
8/9/2018
Page 4 of 4
Appendix A
Wetland Determination Data Forms
Yes No
, soil significantly disturbed?Yes X No
, soil natrually problematic?
Yes X No
Yes X No Yes X No
Yes X No
X
X
X
X
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X
Water Table Present? Yes No X
Saturation Present? Yes No X Yes X No
Depth (Inches):
Depth (Inches):
Depth (Inches):
Wetland located at toe of slope of roadway. Located along old farm road, downgradient of cow pond in fenced pasture. Connects to stream SB and SA.
Remarks:
, or hydrology
Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Mega Park Waterline Project
City of Eden
B.Bill/T.Shelton
swale Slope (%):
DP-1
7/5/2018Date:City/County:Eden / Rockingham
Lat: Long:LRRP / MLRA 136
State:NC Sampling Point:
Fitzgerald
concave <5
36.5237388°Datum:
Section, Township,
Range:
Local relief (concave,
convex, none):
-079.6867089° WGS1984
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
NWI Classification:
Surface Water (A1)
Hydrology
Are vegetation
Are vegetation
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
PFO
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Wetland WA
Are climate/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of the year?
Hydrophytic Vegetation present?
Hydric Soil present?
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Iron Deposits (B5)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Project/Site:
Applicant/Owner:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillslope, terrace,
etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):
Soil Map Unit Name:
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
, or hydrology
(LeB) Leaksville silt loam, 0-4% slopes
(If no, explain in Remarks)X
Are "Normal Circumstances" present?)
(Plot Size: 30' )3 (A)
1 30 Y FAC
2 30 Y FACW
3 20 Y FAC 5 (B)
4 N
5 N
6 N 60%(A/B)
7 N
80 =Total Cover
(Plot Size: )0 0
1 N 30 60
2 N 50 150
3 N 5 20
4 N 0 0
5 N
6 N 85 230 (B)
7 N
0 =Total Cover 2.71
(Plot Size: )
1 N X
2 N X
3 N
4 N
5 N
6 N
7 N
0 =Total Cover
(Plot Size: 5' )
1 5 Y FACU
2 N
3 N
4 N
5 N
6 N
7 N
8 N
9 N
10 N
11 N
12 N
5 =Total Cover
(Plot Size: 30' )
1 15 Y NI
2 N
3 N
4 N
5 N Yes No
15 =Total Cover
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.Sampling Point: DP-1
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species that Are OBL,
FACW, or FAC:
UPL Species
Column Totals:
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
OBL Species
FACW Species
FAC Species
FACU Species
Total Number of Dominant Species Across
All Strata:
Hydrophytic
Vegetation Present?X
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation¹ (Explain)
Dominance Test is > 50%
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0¹
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous
vines, regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody
vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1m) in height.
¹ Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft
(6m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at
breast height (DBH).
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to
20 ft (1 to 6m) in height.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL,
FACW, or FAC:
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
ft (6m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6cm) DBH.
Parthenocissus quinquefolia
Wisteria floribunda
Shrub Stratum
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant
Species?
Indicator
StatusTree Stratum
Acer negundo
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Ulmus americana
Sapling Statum
(A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
x1=
x2=
x3=
x4=
x5=
Herb Stratum
Woody Vine Stratum
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
% % Type¹ Loc²
96 4 C M
X
Restrictive Layer (if observed:)
Yes X No
Depth (Inches)
0-8
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Matrix Redox Features
Color (moist)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Texture
clayloam10YR4/6
Color (Moist)
10YR4/2
Remarks
faint mottles
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils³:
2 cm Much (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)(MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Sampling Point: DP-1SOIL
Remarks:
Hydric Soil
Present?
² Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix¹ Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains.
³ Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology
must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Type:
Depth (inches:)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
Yes No
, soil significantly disturbed?Yes X No
, soil natrually problematic?
Yes X No
Yes X No Yes X No
Yes X No
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes X No 1
Water Table Present? Yes X No 8
Saturation Present? Yes X No 6 Yes X No
Depth (Inches):
Depth (Inches):
Depth (Inches):
Remarks:
, or hydrology
Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Mega Park Waterline Project
City of Eden
B.Bill/T.Shelton
flat Slope (%):
DP-2
7/5/2018Date:City/County:Eden / Rockingham
Lat: Long:LRRP / MLRA 136
State:NC Sampling Point:
Fitzgerald
concave <2
36.5316528°Datum:
Section, Township,
Range:
Local relief (concave,
convex, none):
-079.6513517° WGS1984
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
NWI Classification:
Surface Water (A1)
Hydrology
Are vegetation
Are vegetation
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
PFO
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Wetland WB
Are climate/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of the year?
Hydrophytic Vegetation present?
Hydric Soil present?
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Iron Deposits (B5)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Project/Site:
Applicant/Owner:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillslope, terrace,
etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):
Soil Map Unit Name:
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
, or hydrology
(DaA) Dan River loam, 0 to 2% slopes, frequently flooded
(If no, explain in Remarks)X
Are "Normal Circumstances" present?)
(Plot Size: 30' )6 (A)
1 5 N FAC
2 60 Y FAC
3 N 6 (B)
4 N
5 N
6 N 100%(A/B)
7 N
65 =Total Cover
(Plot Size: 15' )0 0
1 20 Y FAC 5 10
2 10 Y FAC 110 330
3 N 0 0
4 N 0 0
5 N
6 N 115 340 (B)
7 N
30 =Total Cover 2.96
(Plot Size: 10' )
1 5 Y FAC X
2 N X
3 N
4 N
5 N
6 N
7 N
5 =Total Cover
(Plot Size: 5' )
1 5 Y FACW
2 10 Y FAC
3 N
4 N
5 N
6 N
7 N
8 N
9 N
10 N
11 N
12 N
15 =Total Cover
(Plot Size: )
1 N
2 N
3 N
4 N
5 N Yes No
0 =Total Cover
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.Sampling Point: DP-2
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species that Are OBL,
FACW, or FAC:
UPL Species
Column Totals:
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
OBL Species
FACW Species
FAC Species
FACU Species
Total Number of Dominant Species Across
All Strata:
Hydrophytic
Vegetation Present?X
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation¹ (Explain)
Dominance Test is > 50%
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0¹
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous
vines, regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody
vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1m) in height.
¹ Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft
(6m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at
breast height (DBH).
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to
20 ft (1 to 6m) in height.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL,
FACW, or FAC:
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
ft (6m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6cm) DBH.
Boehmeria cylindrica
Smilax rotundifolia
Lindera benzoin
Shrub Stratum
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant
Species?
Indicator
Status
Acer negundo
Tree Stratum
Acer rubrum
Acer negundo
Acer rubrum
Sapling Statum
(A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
x1=
x2=
x3=
x4=
x5=
Herb Stratum
Woody Vine Stratum
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
% % Type¹ Loc²
80 20 C M
X
Restrictive Layer (if observed:)
Yes X No
Depth (Inches)
0-9
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Matrix Redox Features
Color (moist)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Texture
Loam10YR4/4
Color (Moist)
10YR5/1
Remarks
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils³:
2 cm Much (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)(MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Sampling Point: DP-2SOIL
Remarks:
Hydric Soil
Present?
² Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix¹ Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains.
³ Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology
must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Type:
Depth (inches:)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
Yes No
, soil significantly disturbed?Yes X No
, soil natrually problematic?
Yes X No
Yes X No Yes X No
Yes X No
X
X
X
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X
Water Table Present? Yes No X
Saturation Present? Yes No X Yes X No
Depth (Inches):
Depth (Inches):
Depth (Inches):
Remarks:
, or hydrology
Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Mega Park Waterline Project
City of Eden
B.Bill/T.Shelton
flat Slope (%):
DP-3
7/17/2018Date:City/County:Eden / Rockingham
Lat: Long:LRRP / MLRA 136
State:NC Sampling Point:
Fitzgerald
concave <2
36.5320709°Datum:
Section, Township,
Range:
Local relief (concave,
convex, none):
-079.6487220° WGS1984
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
NWI Classification:
Surface Water (A1)
Hydrology
Are vegetation
Are vegetation
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
PFO
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Wetland WC
Are climate/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of the year?
Hydrophytic Vegetation present?
Hydric Soil present?
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Iron Deposits (B5)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Project/Site:
Applicant/Owner:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillslope, terrace,
etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):
Soil Map Unit Name:
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
, or hydrology
(DaA) Dan River loam, 0 to 2% slopes, frequently flooded
(If no, explain in Remarks)X
Are "Normal Circumstances" present?)
(Plot Size: 30' )4 (A)
1 10 N FAC
2 70 Y FAC
3 N 4 (B)
4 N
5 N
6 N 100%(A/B)
7 N
80 =Total Cover
(Plot Size: 15' )0 0
1 10 Y FAC 0 0
2 N 105 315
3 N 0 0
4 N 0 0
5 N
6 N 105 315 (B)
7 N
10 =Total Cover 3.00
(Plot Size: 10' )
1 10 Y FAC X
2 N X
3 N
4 N
5 N
6 N
7 N
10 =Total Cover
(Plot Size: 5' )
1 5 Y FAC
2 N
3 N
4 N
5 N
6 N
7 N
8 N
9 N
10 N
11 N
12 N
5 =Total Cover
(Plot Size: )
1 N
2 N
3 N
4 N
5 N Yes No
0 =Total Cover
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.Sampling Point: DP-3
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species that Are OBL,
FACW, or FAC:
UPL Species
Column Totals:
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
OBL Species
FACW Species
FAC Species
FACU Species
Total Number of Dominant Species Across
All Strata:
Hydrophytic
Vegetation Present?X
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation¹ (Explain)
Dominance Test is > 50%
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0¹
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous
vines, regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody
vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1m) in height.
¹ Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft
(6m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at
breast height (DBH).
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to
20 ft (1 to 6m) in height.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL,
FACW, or FAC:
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
ft (6m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6cm) DBH.
Smilax rotundifolia
Acer rubrum
Shrub Stratum
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant
Species?
Indicator
Status
Acer rubrum
Tree Stratum
Acer rubrum
Quercus phellos
Sapling Statum
(A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
x1=
x2=
x3=
x4=
x5=
Herb Stratum
Woody Vine Stratum
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
% % Type¹ Loc²
80 20 C PL
90 10 C M
100
X
Restrictive Layer (if observed:)
Yes X No
Depth (Inches)
0-2
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
2-7
7-12
Matrix Redox Features
Color (moist)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Texture
Loam
Sandy Loam
10YR4/6
10YR5/6
Color (Moist)
10YR5/3
10YR6/2
10YR5/4
Remarks
Sandy Loam
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils³:
2 cm Much (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)(MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Sampling Point: DP-3SOIL
Remarks:
Landform provides depression without direct outflow, ponding likely occurs frequently.
Hydric Soil
Present?
² Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix¹ Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains.
³ Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology
must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Type:
Depth (inches:)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
Yes No
, soil significantly disturbed?Yes X No
, soil natrually problematic?
Yes X No
Yes X No Yes X No
Yes X No
X
X
X
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X
Water Table Present? Yes No X
Saturation Present? Yes No X Yes X No
Depth (Inches):
Depth (Inches):
Depth (Inches):
Remarks:
, or hydrology
Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Mega Park Waterline Project
City of Eden
B.Bill/T.Shelton
swale Slope (%):
DP-4
7/17/2018Date:City/County:Eden / Rockingham
Lat: Long:LRRP / MLRA 136
State:NC Sampling Point:
Fitzgerald
concave <10
36.5367077°Datum:
Section, Township,
Range:
Local relief (concave,
convex, none):
-079.6370762° WGS1984
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
NWI Classification:
Surface Water (A1)
Hydrology
Are vegetation
Are vegetation
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
PFO
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Wetland WD & WE
Are climate/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of the year?
Hydrophytic Vegetation present?
Hydric Soil present?
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Iron Deposits (B5)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Project/Site:
Applicant/Owner:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillslope, terrace,
etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):
Soil Map Unit Name:
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
, or hydrology
(CmD) Clover sandy loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
(If no, explain in Remarks)X
Are "Normal Circumstances" present?)
(Plot Size: 30' )5 (A)
1 15 Y FAC
2 40 Y FAC
3 15 Y FACW 5 (B)
4 N
5 N
6 N 100%(A/B)
7 N
70 =Total Cover
(Plot Size: )0 0
1 N 15 30
2 N 75 225
3 N 0 0
4 N 0 0
5 N
6 N 90 255 (B)
7 N
0 =Total Cover 2.83
(Plot Size: 10' )
1 15 Y FAC X
2 N X
3 N
4 N
5 N
6 N
7 N
15 =Total Cover
(Plot Size: 5' )
1 5 Y FAC
2 N
3 N
4 N
5 N
6 N
7 N
8 N
9 N
10 N
11 N
12 N
5 =Total Cover
(Plot Size:)
1 N
2 N
3 N
4 N
5 N Yes No
0 =Total Cover
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.Sampling Point:DP-4
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species that Are OBL,
FACW, or FAC:
UPL Species
Column Totals:
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
OBL Species
FACW Species
FAC Species
FACU Species
Total Number of Dominant Species Across
All Strata:
Hydrophytic
Vegetation Present?X
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation¹ (Explain)
Dominance Test is > 50%
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0¹
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous
vines, regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody
vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1m) in height.
¹ Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft
(6m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at
breast height (DBH).
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to
20 ft (1 to 6m) in height.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL,
FACW, or FAC:
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
ft (6m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6cm) DBH.
Smilax rotundifolia
Acer rubrum
Shrub Stratum
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant
Species?
Indicator
StatusTree Stratum
Acer rubrum
Quercus phellos
Ulmus americana
Sapling Statum
(A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
Tree and shrub species located on edge of wetland and provides canopy as described. Remainder of the wetland is sparsely vegetated.
x1=
x2=
x3=
x4=
x5=
Herb Stratum
Woody Vine Stratum
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
% % Type¹ Loc²
100
50 10 C M
40 C M
X
Restrictive Layer (if observed:)
Yes X No
Depth (Inches)
0-2
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
2-8
Matrix Redox Features
10YR6/3
Color (moist)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Texture
Loam
Clay Loam7.5YR5/6
Color (Moist)
7.5YR4/2
10YR5/2
Remarks
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils³:
2 cm Much (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)(MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Sampling Point: DP-4SOIL
Remarks:
Hydric Soil
Present?
² Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix¹ Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains.
³ Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology
must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Type:
Depth (inches:)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
Yes No
, soil significantly disturbed?Yes X No
, soil natrually problematic?
Yes X No
Yes No X Yes No X
Yes No X
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X
Water Table Present? Yes No X
Saturation Present? Yes No X Yes No X
, or hydrology
(DaA) Dan River loam, 0 to 2% slopes, frequently flooded
(If no, explain in Remarks)X
Are "Normal Circumstances" present?)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Iron Deposits (B5)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Project/Site:
Applicant/Owner:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillslope, terrace,
etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):
Soil Map Unit Name:
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
NWI Classification:
Surface Water (A1)
Hydrology
Are vegetation
Are vegetation
Summary of Findings - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc
UPL
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Upland data point
Are climate/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of the year?
Hydrophytic Vegetation present?
Hydric Soil present?
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Lat: Long:LRRP / MLRA 136
State:NC Sampling Point:
Fitzgerald
none <5
36.5319596°Datum:
Section, Township,
Range:
Local relief (concave,
convex, none):
-079.6491798° WGS1984
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Mega Park Waterline Project
City of Eden
B.Bill/T.Shelton
sideslope Slope (%):
DP-5
7/17/2018Date:City/County:Eden / Rockingham
, or hydrology
Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Depth (Inches):
Depth (Inches):
Depth (Inches):
Remarks:
(Plot Size: 30' )7 (A)
1 30 Y FAC
2 10 N FAC
3 30 Y FACU 8 (B)
4 15 N FAC
5 N
6 N 88%(A/B)
7 N
85 =Total Cover
(Plot Size: 15' )0 0
1 10 Y FAC 0 0
2 N 100 300
3 N 30 120
4 N 0 0
5 N
6 N 130 420 (B)
7 N
10 =Total Cover 3.23
(Plot Size: 10' )
1 10 Y FAC X
2 5 Y FAC
3 N
4 N
5 N
6 N
7 N
15 =Total Cover
(Plot Size: 5' )
1 5 Y FAC
2 5 Y FAC
3 10 Y FAC
4 N
5 N
6 N
7 N
8 N
9 N
10 N
11 N
12 N
20 =Total Cover
(Plot Size: )
1 N
2 N
3 N
4 N
5 N Yes No
0 =Total Cover
(A)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below.)
x1=
x2=
x3=
x4=
x5=
Herb Stratum
Woody Vine Stratum
Acer rubrum
Quercus phellos
Liriodendron tulipifera
Liquidambar styraciflua
Sapling Statum
Absolute
% Cover
Dominant
Species?
Indicator
Status
Acer rubrum
Tree Stratum
Acer rubrum
Shrub Stratum
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL,
FACW, or FAC:
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20
ft (6m) or more in height and less than 3 in. (7.6cm) DBH.
Smilax rotundifolia
Liquidambar styraciflua
Acer rubrum
Liquidambar styraciflua
Hydrophytic
Vegetation Present?X
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation¹ (Explain)
Dominance Test is > 50%
Prevalence Index is ≤3.0¹
Herb - All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, including herbaceous
vines, regardless of size. Includes woody plants, except woody
vines, less than approximately 3 ft (1m) in height.
¹ Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 20 ft
(6m) or more in height and 3 in. (7.6cm) or larger in diameter at
breast height (DBH).
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines, approximately 3 to
20 ft (1 to 6m) in height.
VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.Sampling Point: DP-5
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species that Are OBL,
FACW, or FAC:
UPL Species
Column Totals:
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
Prevalence Index Worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
OBL Species
FACW Species
FAC Species
FACU Species
Total Number of Dominant Species Across
All Strata:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
% % Type¹ Loc²
100
95 5 C M
Restrictive Layer (if observed:)
Yes No X
Sampling Point: DP-5SOIL
Remarks:
Hydric Soil
Present?
² Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix¹ Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains.
³ Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology
must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Type:
Depth (inches:)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N, MLRA 136)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9)(MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils³:
2 cm Much (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 136, 147)
Red Parent Material (TF2)
Remarks
10YR5/4
10YR6/4
Texture
Loam
Loam10YR5/4
Color (Moist)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Depth (Inches)
0-3
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
3-12
Matrix Redox Features
Color (moist)
Appendix B
Wetland Exhibit

WA1WA2 WA3 WA4 WA5
WB1
WB2
WB3
WB4
WB5
WB6WB7
WB8
WB9WB10
WB11
SA1 SA2 SA3SA4SA5SA6SB1SB2SB3 SB4 SB5 SC1 SC2SC3 SC4 SC5SC6SC7SC8SC9SC10SC11SC12SC13 SD1 SD2 SD3 SD4SD5SD6SD7SD8
SE1 SE2 SE3
SE4 SE5DP1
DP2WC1
WC2
WC3
WC4 WC5
WC6
WC7
WC8
WC9
WC10
WC11
WC12
WC13
WC14
WC15 WC16
WD1WD2
WD3
WD4
WD5
WD6
WD7
WD8
WD9
WD10
WD11WD12
WD13
WE1
WE2
WE3WE4
WE5
WE6
WE7
WE8
wetland line st
a
r
tSF1
SF2
SF3
SF4
SF5SF6SF7
SF8SG1
SG2
SG3
SG4
SG5SG6SF9
SH1
SH2 SH3
SH4
SH5
SH6
SH7
SH8DP3
eph/remove\DP4Stream SA (Dry Creek)Wetland WAStream SCStream SDStream SBStream
SEWetland WBStream SF
(Cascade
C
reek
)Wetland WCStream
SHStream
SGWetland
WDWetland
WEDP5551 Piney Forest RoadDanville, VA 24540-3353434.797.4497Dewberry Engineers Inc.PROJECTPROJ. NO.TITLEDATESHEET NO.DRAWING NO.REVISIONWetland Exhibit50102913N/A8/7/18N/A1LEGENDStreamWetlandData PointInvestigation BoundaryDP#to Eden, NCUS-311/NC-770US-311/NC-770Sheet 2Sheet 3Sheet 4Sheet 5Sheet 6Sheet 7Sheet 8Sheet 9Sheet 10Vicinity MapSoVA Mega Site at Berry Hill - Phase I Water, NC
WA1WA2WA3WA4SA1SA2SA3SA4SA5SA6SB1SB2SB3SB4SB5DP13
0
1
+
0
0
3
0
2
+
0
0
3
0
2
+
3
9 Stream SA (Dry Creek)Wetland WAStream SB551 Piney Forest RoadDanville, VA 24540-3353434.797.4497Dewberry Engineers Inc.PROJECTPROJ. NO.TITLEDATESHEET NO.DRAWING NO.REVISIONWetland Exhibit50102913N/A8/7/18N/A2Feet02040LEGENDStreamWetlandData PointInvestigation BoundaryDP#SoVA Mega Site at Berry Hill - Phase I Water, NC
SC1SC2SC3SC4SC5SC6SC7SC8SC9SC10SC11SC12SC132
6
5
+
0
0
2
6
6
+
0
0 Stream SC551 Piney Forest RoadDanville, VA 24540-3353434.797.4497Dewberry Engineers Inc.PROJECTPROJ. NO.TITLEDATESHEET NO.DRAWING NO.REVISIONWetland Exhibit50102913N/A8/7/18N/A3Feet02040LEGENDStreamWetlandData PointInvestigation BoundaryDP#SoVA Mega Site at Berry Hill - Phase I Water, NC
SD1SD2SD3SD4SD5SD6SD7SD82
6
1
+
0
0
262+00 Stream SD551 Piney Forest RoadDanville, VA 24540-3353434.797.4497Dewberry Engineers Inc.PROJECTPROJ. NO.TITLEDATESHEET NO.DRAWING NO.REVISIONWetland Exhibit50102913N/A8/7/18N/A4Feet02040LEGENDStreamWetlandData PointInvestigation BoundaryDP#SoVA Mega Site at Berry Hill - Phase I Water, NC
SE1SE2SE3SE4SE5205+00206+00207+00Stream SE551 Piney Forest RoadDanville, VA 24540-3353434.797.4497Dewberry Engineers Inc.PROJECTPROJ. NO.TITLEDATESHEET NO.DRAWING NO.REVISIONWetland Exhibit50102913N/A8/7/18N/A5Feet02040LEGENDStreamWetlandData PointInvestigation BoundaryDP#SoVA Mega Site at Berry Hill - Phase I Water, NC
WB2WB3WB4WB5WB6WB7WB8WB9WB10WB11DP2182+00183+00184+00185+00Wetland WB551 Piney Forest RoadDanville, VA 24540-3353434.797.4497Dewberry Engineers Inc.PROJECTPROJ. NO.TITLEDATESHEET NO.DRAWING NO.REVISIONWetland Exhibit50102913N/A8/7/18N/A6Feet02040LEGENDStreamWetlandData PointInvestigation BoundaryDP#SoVA Mega Site at Berry Hill - Phase I Water, NC
SF1SF2SF3SF4SF5SF6SF7SF8SG1SG2SG3SG4SG5SG6SF9177+00178+00179+00180+00Stream SF (Cascade Creek)Stream SG551 Piney Forest RoadDanville, VA 24540-3353434.797.4497Dewberry Engineers Inc.PROJECTPROJ. NO.TITLEDATESHEET NO.DRAWING NO.REVISIONWetland Exhibit50102913N/A8/7/18N/A7Feet02040LEGENDStreamWetlandData PointInvestigation BoundaryDP#SoVA Mega Site at Berry Hill - Phase I Water, NC
WC1WC2WC3WC4WC5WC6WC7WC8WC9WC10WC11WC12WC13WC14WC15WC16DP3170+00171+00172+00173+00174+00175+00Wetland WC551 Piney Forest RoadDanville, VA 24540-3353434.797.4497Dewberry Engineers Inc.PROJECTPROJ. NO.TITLEDATESHEET NO.DRAWING NO.REVISIONWetland Exhibit50102913N/A8/7/18N/A8Feet050100LEGENDStreamWetlandData PointInvestigation BoundaryDP#SoVA Mega Site at Berry Hill - Phase I Water, NC
SH1SH2SH3SH4SH5150+001
5
1
+
0
0152+00Stream SH551 Piney Forest RoadDanville, VA 24540-3353434.797.4497Dewberry Engineers Inc.PROJECTPROJ. NO.TITLEDATESHEET NO.DRAWING NO.REVISIONWetland Exhibit50102913N/A8/7/18N/A9Feet02040LEGENDStreamWetlandData PointInvestigation BoundaryDP#SoVA Mega Site at Berry Hill - Phase I Water, NC
WD1WD2WD3WD4WD5WD6WD7WD8WD9WD10WD11WD12WD13WE1WE2WE3WE4WE5WE6WE7WE8DP4133+00134+00135+00136+00Wetland WDWetland WE551 Piney Forest RoadDanville, VA 24540-3353434.797.4497Dewberry Engineers Inc.PROJECTPROJ. NO.TITLEDATESHEET NO.DRAWING NO.REVISIONWetland ExhibitSoVA Mega Site at Berry Hill - Phase I Water, NC50102913N/A8/7/18N/A10Feet02040LEGENDStreamWetlandData PointInvestigation BoundaryDP#
Appendix C
Site Photographs

Stream SA (Dry Creek), facing northwest from NC 770.
Stream SB, facing north from Stream SA, northwest of NC 770.
Wetland WA, facing southeast towards NC 770.
Stream SC, facing southwest along NC 770.
Stream SC, facing southeast towards NC 770.
Stream SD, facing northwest from culvert at NC 770.
Stream SE, culvert at old farm road north of NC 770.
Wetland WB, north of NC 770.
Stream SF (Cascade Creek), facing north at underpass of NC 770.
Stream SG, facing southwest towards Stream SF, north of NC 770.
Wetland WC, facing northeast, north of NC 770.
Stream SH, facing northeast, north of NC 770.
Wetland WD, facing southwest, north of NC 770.
Wetland WE, facing southwest, north of NC 770.