20180944 Ver 1_Individual_20180703

Coastal Management
ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY
ROY COOPER
Guoernor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
BRAXTON DAVIS
Director
June 26 2018 2 Q 1 a 0 9 4 4
TO: Karen Higgins JUL 0 3 2018
401 & Buffer Permitting Unit
DWR / Water Quality Permitting p _ RE OUR ES
4o E P R
FROM: Heather Coats, Beach & Inlet Management Coordinator
NCDEQ - Division of Coastal Management
127 Cardinal Drive Ext., Wilm., NC 28405 heather. coats(a-)-ncdenr.gov
Fax: [phone] (Courier 04-16-33)
SUBJECT: CAMA / Dredge & Fill Application Review
Applicant: Carteret County: Bogue Banks 50 -yr Master Beach Nourishment Plan
Project Location: from Bogue Court to Tar Landing Road, in Carteret County
Proposed Project: a 50 -year comprehensive beach nourishment plan from Bogue Inlet
in Emerald Island to the beginning for Fort Macon in Atlantic Beach
Download all associated files
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and
return this form to Heather Coats at the address above by July 20, 2018. If you have any
questions regarding the proposed project, contact Heather Coats at [phone] when appropriate
in-depth comments with supporting data is requested.
REPLY:
SIGNED
This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
"Additional comments may be attached"
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes
are incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached
comments.
DATED
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Coastal Management
127 Cardinal Drive Ext., Wilmington, NC 28405 919 796 7215

DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
1. APPLICANT'S NAME: Carteret County/ Bogue Banks 50 -year Master Beach Nourishment Plan
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: The project site is located on Bogue Banks, from Bogue Court to
Tar Landing Road, Carteret County.
Approximate State Plane Coordinates — X: 2572809 (start)/ 2690975 (end) Y: 330839 (start)/ 391695 (end)
Approx. Lat: 34°38'38.15"N/ 34°41'39.66"N Long: 77'543.49"W/76'42'3.74"W
INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA / D&F
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit — 6/4/18
Was Applicant Present — Yes
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received —6/4/18 & 6/6/18 (complete)
Office — Wilmington
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan — Carteret County- Emerald Isle, Pine Knoll Shores, and Atlantic Beach
AEC(s) Involved: OH, IIIA, PTA
(C) Water Dependent: Yes
(D) Intended Use: Public
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing — On-site treatment
Planned - N/A
(F) Type of Structures: Existing — Commercial and Residential structures and accessways
Planned — 50 -year comprehensive beach renourishment plan
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: 0'-19.9'/year SBF: 2'/year
7. HABITAT DESCRIPTION:
10
m
(J)
[AREA]
DREDGED FILLED OTHER
(A) Vegetated Wetlands (coastal)
Other (Below MHW)
Up to 773 acres (1st
— 128.5 acres (11t project)
project) & Unknown
3,277 acres (50 -year
over 50 -yr project)total
(C) Other (Above MHW)
Possible future
227.5 acres (11 project)
excavation assoc. with
4,136 acres (50 -year
upland borrow sites
total)
over the course of the
50 -yr project.
Total Area Disturbed: —356 acres of beach fill (1St project); 7,413 acres of beach fill total (over 50 -year
project)
Primary Nursery Area: No
Water Classification: SA
Open: No
State of North Caroltrta I Environmental Quality I Coastal Management
WBmIngton Office 1 127 Cardkol Drive Extension I WIImiington. North Carolina 28405
910 796 7215

Bogue Banks Master Beach Nourishment Plan
Page Two
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: The applicant is proposing a 50- year comprehensive beach nourishment plan from
Bogue Inlet at Emerald Isle to the beginning of Fort Macon in Atlantic Beach.
9. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Bogue Banks is a barrier island located in Carteret County between Bogue Inlet to the west and Beaufort
inlet to the east. The island is predominantly southeast facing and is approximately 25 miles in length. It
is made up of 4 municipalities: Emerald Isle, Indian Beach, Pine Knoll Shores and Atlantic Beach; the
incorporated community of Salter Path; and Fort Macon State Park at the east end of the island. It is
bordered by the Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway (AIWW) to the north and the Atlantic Ocean to the south.
Bear Island/Hammocks Beach State Park is located to the west of Bogue Inlet. Shackleford Banks and
Cape Lookout National Seashore is located to the east of Beaufort Inlet. Both Bear Island and
Shackleford Banks are undeveloped barrier islands. The island is accessed via 2 bridges. The western
bridge leads into Emerald Isle via NC Highway 58, located off NC Highway 24 between Cedar Point and
Cape Carteret. The eastern bridge leads onto the island in Atlantic Beach and is accessed from NC
Highway 70 in Morehead City.
The project site extends from a point near Inlet Court adjacent to Bogue Inlet in Emerald Isle, east
through Atlantic Beach, stopping short of Fort Macon. The long-term erosion rate for the island
(including the inlet area) ranges from 0'-19.9'/year. The 100 -year storm recession line for the island was
predicted to be 50'. The westernmost portion of Emerald Isle is located within the Inlet Hazard Area.
In the mid- to late -1990's, much of the island suffered damage from the 5 hurricanes that made landfall in
NC. As a result, 2001 legislation directed the creation of the 11 -member Carteret County Beach
Commission to advise on beach renourishment strategies and expenditures of Carteret County's Room
Occupancy Tax, a portion of which is allotted specifically for the funding of beach nourishment projects
on Bogue Banks. Each of the four municipalities on the island are represented on the Commission. An
interlocal agreement to share the funds was also signed by four municipalities and the County in 2010.
This agreement further strengthened the municipal relationships and resource sharing that paved the way
for the development of this Bogue Banks Master Plan. Annual shoreline surveys have been performed on
the island since 1999, and monitoring of Bear Island and Shackleford Banks were also added to the
survey protocol in 2005 to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the regional dynamics. A Section
933 Study was completed in 2003 which led to the placement of approximately 700,000 cubic yards of
sand on Indian Beach/Salter Path, followed by approximately 508,000 cubic yards of sand placed on Pine
Knoll Shores in 2007. Two FEMA -funded projects placed 1.4 mcy of sand along Bogue Banks in 2004
and 2007, and a third project placed an additional 965,000 mcy of sand on Emerald Isle and Pine Knoll
Shores in 2013 in response to Hurricanes Isabel, Ophelia and Irene. Sand is also placed on Atlantic Beach
as part of the USACE's Morehead City Inner Harbor Maintenance Dredge Project and its associated
Dredged Material Management Plan (I)MMP), and on the area adjacent to Bogue Inlet by way of the
Bogue Inlet AIWW crossing maintenance disposal. (See Section 2 and Figure 2-2 in the narrative for a
more complete description of historical Bogue Banks sand placement projects). Please note that the
existing federal projects are assumed to continue and this project is intended to supplement rather than
replace those projects. Additionally, a USACE Feasibility Study for a Coastal Storm Damage Reduction
(CSDR) Project for Bogue Banks was approved in 1998 and a Feasibility Study Agreement was executed
State of North Carolina I Envkonm nW Quality I Coastal Management
Wf nhVon Office 1 127 Cardinal Drive Extension I Wilmington. North Carolina 28405
910 796 7215

I
Bogue Banks Master Beach Nourishment Plan
Page Three
in 2001 which led to a 2013 report and authorization via the 2016 Water Resources Development Act
(WRDA); however, no funding has subsequently been appropriated or is anticipated at this time.
The applicant has identified several potential borrow sites to supply sand for the 50 -year project. The
federal Ocean Dredged Material Disposal Site (ODMDS) is proposed to serve as the primary source of
sand, but the ebb channel of Bogue Inlet, and other nearshore and upland sites have been preliminarily
evaluated for suitability (see Section 5 of the narrative and Appendix C- the Sediment Analysis Report for
more details). The ODMDS is divided into "current" and "old" sections. The northeast comer of the
"current" and a portion of the "old" ODMDS have been identified as the borrow source for the initial
2018/2019 project. Current water depths in these sections of the ODMDS range from approximately -36'
to -50' NAVD 88. (See Sections 1.0 and 3.0 and Figures 3-1 & 4-5 in the Project #1 Event Notification,
and Sheet 40 of 61 for more information on the first project's proposed borrow site). Sediments collected
via Vibracore samples within these portions of the ODMDS were shown to have a Unified Soils
Classification System (USCS) designation of predominantly SW. Anticipated construction methodologies
to be used throughout the 50 -year project would be pipeline and hopper dredges, with the option of truck
haul, in the case of upland borrow site use. While many of the potential borrow sites presented for later
projects do not adequately establish compatibility with the State's Technical Standards for Beach Fill
Projects (15A 07H.0312) in the Sediment Analysis Report (Appendix C), the applicant has
acknowledged additional sampling will be required for some of these sites in order to confirm
compatibility, as stated in Section 5.0 of the report. No potential archeological resources were identified
in the vicinity of the ODMDS by remote sensing surveys (see Appendix D- Archeological Remote
Sensing for more information). The current ODMDS and it appears a small portion of old ODMDS falls
outside the State's 3 -mile jurisdiction limit and are therefore in federal waters, requiring coordination and
approval from the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM).
The native beach was characterized using data previously collected due previous projects. Fines were
calculated at less than 1%, with sand comprising 98.68%, and granular and gravel material combined at
less than 1.32%. Calcium carbonate was reported at 15-20%. Clast counts of material greater than 3" in
size was evaluated at two 50,000 square foot sites: in Atlantic Beach between Transects 78 to 81, between
the Doubletree Hilton hotel to the Dunescape Villas; and in Emerald Isle between Transects 26 and 30
from Matt Drive to West Summer Place. One hundred and thirty-eight (13 8) shells greater than 3" in size
were found in the Atlantic Beach location and 211 clasts (both rock and shell >3" in size) were found in
Emerald Isle. These sites were chosen because they have received minimal to no sand from past
nourishment events and it is believed most accurately represent the native beach state.
The waters of Bogue and Beaufort Inlets fall within the White Oak River Basin, as classified by the NC
Division of Water Resources (DWR). The waters adjacent to Bogue Inlet are classified as SA-ORW and
the waters adjacent to Beaufort Inlet are classified as SA by the DWR. The NC Division of Marine
Fisheries has NOT designated any of the areas to be impacted as a Primary Nursery Area, and there are
no foreseen impacts to shellfish resources at this time.
PROPOSED PROJECT:
The applicant is proposing a 50 -year beach nourishment master plan project for Bogue Banks. The project
area would extend from Inlet Court adjacent to Bogue Inlet in Emerald Isle to the beginning of Fort
Macon in Atlantic Beach. The overall proposed project length is approximately 23 miles (121,702 linear
feet) and a berm would be constructed to an elevation of +6' NAVD 88. The applicant has determined
State of North CaroUna I EnWonmentid Qpahty I Coastal Management
w8mington office 1 127 Cardinal Drive Extension I Wilmington. North Carolina 28405
910 796 7215

Bogue Banks Master Beach Nourishment Plan
Page Four
projected sand needs for the life of the project based on statistical analysis of historical data, through
which historical background erosion and losses from storm events as calculated, as well as projecting
anticipated future losses from sea level rise. Table 3-1 in the narrative has been generated to define
projected volume requirements set out at 3, 6, and 9 -year intervals. Tables 3-2 through 3-7 in the narrative
are also broken out into 6, 10 and 50 -year nourishment projected minimum and maximum volumes at 25
cy/ft, 50cy/fft and 75 cy/ft fill densities. These latter tables are further broken into thresholds for cases of
background erosion, storm erosion, and then background and storm erosion combined (in all cases
inclusive of projected sea level rise). Appendix A provides additional detailed tables presenting potential
totals at 3 -year intervals whereby combined event volumes, lengths and areas are also given on a "rolling"
basis (i.e. the last 2 events are added for the 6 -year rolling totals, the last 3 events are included for the 10 -
year totals and all projected event impacts are included for the 50 -year total).
While projects are proposed to occur at 3 -year intervals, the initial project is proposed in the fall/winter of
2018/2019. The initial project would extend 50,030 feet (9.5 miles) in length and would fill
approximately 310' in beach width. The project would extend from just west of Park Drive within the
town limits of Emerald Isle (a distance of approximately 3 miles), through Indian Beach and the
unincorporated area of Salter Path (a total of approximately 2 miles with a gap between sections), and
would include approximately 4.5 miles of beach in Pine Knoll Shores. The berm would extend to the +6'
NAVD 88 contour with a projected berm ranging from 35' to 85' in width and a 20:1 slope waterward of
the berm. Anticipated fill volumes for the initial project range from 23 to 45 cubic yards per linear foot.
As proposed, this project would pump an approximate gross volume of 1.974 million cubic yards of sand
(see Figure 3-2 in the narrative for individual community placement volumes). However, the applicant is
accounting for an estimated placement loss of approximately 23%, therefore the final net volume of
approximately 1.519 million cubic yards is anticipated to be placed on the beach. It is currently estimated
that 5,597,460 square feet would be filled below MHW (128.5 acres and 889,900 cubic yards). Of that
material, 1,825,164 square feet (41.9 acres) would also be located below MLW. Approximately 9,911,840
square feet of beach fill material would be placed above the MHW line. The applicant estimates
approximately 99' of fill would be placed waterward of the current MHW line on average, within a
maximum projected distance of 123' placed below MHW.
The applicant states that they propose to dredge the approximately 1.974 million cubic yards of material
from the ODMDS during the 2018/2019 project to a design depth of -50 NAVD88 with a proposed
allowable "overburden" of 2'. Approximately 218 acres lies within federal waters and the "Current"
ODMDS and approximately 555 acres fall within State waters and the "Old" ODMDS site. The material
would be dredged via a hopper dredge, transported to offshore temporary mooring, and then pumped by
submerged pipeline onto the beach.
10. ANTICIPATED IMPACTS
The proposed dredging associated with the first 2018/2019 project would result in impacts to up to 773
acres of submerged bottom located in both state and federal waters. The first project would result in the
fill of approximately 128.5 acres of upper beach (above NHW) and would fill approximately 41.9 acres of
intertidal area and near -shore shallow bottom. The dredging and beach fill would result in temporary
increases in turbidity. The overall 50 -year project is anticipated to result in the placement of up to 51.6
mcy of material over the 23.5 miles project area and would fill approximately 7,412 acres of beach. Final
figures will be dependent on future conditions and are subject to change, but thresholds have been set
forth to limit impacts. Given the intent and nature of the comprehensive plan, it is anticipated that future
state of North carouna I Em lronn=W Qwky I Coastal Management
W&nhgton Office 1 127 Cardinale Drtve Extension I W hnington. North Carolina 28405
910 796 7215

t Bogue Banks Master Beach Nourishment Plan
Page Five
modifications of the CAMA/Dredge & Fill permit will only be required if the thresholds are exceeded, or
if a significant deviation from the proposal or circumstances occur that necessitates a modification of
permit conditions. Instead, the permit would be conditioned to require notification of each future event
that will describe the next project, similar to the Project #1 Event Notification included in the current
application package, submittal of any additional corresponding sediment compatibility analysis to
demonstrate compliance with the State's Technical Standards for Beach Fill Projects. It is hoped that this
event notification process will also serve the permit requirements of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
and the Division of Water Resources. As such, any agency comments regarding the event notification
approval process are welcome. Temporary impacts to benthic and invertebrate infaunal communities can
be expected. The applicant is proposing to limit work between November 16 through April 30, thereby
minimizing long-term impacts to fauna. The applicant has committed to accessing the beach with heavy
equipment via existing public access corridors and would locate temporary storage areas for construction
equipment off the beach to the maximum extent practicable. The narrative states the applicant also agrees
to abide by many of the other standard conditions as addressed in Section 6.6 of the Narrative (Avoidance
and Minimization).
Submitted by: Heather Coats Date: June 26, 2018 Office: Wilmington
State of North Carolina I Errvironrnental Quality I Coastal Management
Wilmington Office 1 127 Cardinal Drive Extension I Wilmington, North Carolina 28405
910 796 726

BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN
CAMA PERMIT DOCUMENTATION
1. NCDCM MP -1 FORM
(50 YR PROJECT & BBMBNP PROJECT #1)
2. NCDCM MP -2 FORM
(50 YR PROJECT)
3. NCDCM MP -2 FORM
(BBMBNP PROJECT #1)
4. PERMIT NARRATIVE
(see electronic copy for appendices)
5. AGENT AUTHORIZATION LETTER
6. AEC HAZARD NOTICE
RECEIVED
JUN 0 4 2018
DCM WILMINGTON, NC

NCDCM MP -1 FORM
(50 YR PROJECT & BBMBNP
PROJECT #1)

goo MP -1
NPLicAnoN f.r
Maier Development Permit
(last revised 12/27/06)
North Carolina DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
1. Primary Applicant/ Landowner Information
Business Name
Carteret County
Project Name (if applicable)
Bogue Banks Master Beach Nourishment Plan
Applicant 1: First Name
Greg
MI
rudi
Last Name
Rudolph
Moffatt & Nichol
Applicant 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
Agent/ Contractor 1: First Name
If additional applicants, please attach an additional page(s) with names listed.
Mailing Address
PO Box
4297
City
Emerald Isle
State
NC
ZIP
28594
Country
USA
Phone No.
252 - 222 -
5835 ext.
FAX No.
252 - 222 - 5826
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
Email
[e-mail]
Mailing Address
2. Agent(Contractor Information
Business Name
Moffatt & Nichol
Agent/ Contractor 1: First Name
MI
Last Name
Johnny
Martin
Agent/ Contractor 2: First Name
MI
Last Name
Dawn
York
Mailing Address
PO Box
City
State
4700 Falls of Neuse, Suite 300
Raleigh
NC
ZIP
Phone No. 1
Phone No. 2
27609
919 - 781 -
4626 ext.
ext.
FAX No.
Contractor #
918 781 4869
Street Address (if different from above)
City
State
ZIP
Email
[e-mail], [e-mail]
<Form continues on back>
252-808-2808 .. 1-888-4RCOAST .. www.nccoastaimanagement.net

Form DCM MP -1 (Page 2 of 5)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
3. Project Location
County (can be multiple)
Street Address
b. Size of entire tract (sq.ft.)
State Rd. #
Carteret
Bogue Court to Tar Landing Road
NC 58
City
Subdivision Name
Emerald Isle, Indian Beach,
State
Zip
N/A, I I
Salter Path, Pine Knoll
NC
-
Shores, Atlantic Beach
Phone No.
e. Vegetation on tract
Lot No. (s) (if many, attach additional page with list)
- - ext.
I I I ,
a. In which NC river basin is the project located?
Dune walkovers
b. Name of body of water nearest to proposed project
White Oak
Developed - residential
Atlantic Ocean
c. Is the water body identified in (b) above, natural or manmade?
d. Name the closest major water body to the proposed project site.
®Natural ❑Manmade ❑Unknown
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
Atlantic Ocean
e. Is proposed work within city limits or planning jurisdiction?
j. Is the proposed activity part of an urban waterfront redevelopment proposal? ❑Yes ®No
f. If applicable, list the planning jurisdiction or city limit the proposed
®Yes ❑No
If yes, by whom?
work falls within.
Corporation (Wes Hall)
Town of Emerald Isle, Town of Indian Beach, Village of Salter
Path, Town of Pine Knoll Shores, Town of Atlantic Beach
4. Site Description
a. Total length of shoreline on the tract (ft.)
b. Size of entire tract (sq.ft.)
121,702 ft (50 yr project); 50,030 ft (BBMBNP Project #1)
121,702 ft x 398 ft = 48,437,395 sq. ft. (50 yr project)
50,030 ft x 310 ft = 15,509,300 sq. ft. (BBMBNP Project
#1)
c. Size of individual lot(s)
d. Approximate elevation of tract above NHW (normal high water) or
N/A, I I
NWL (normal water level)
(If many lot sizes, please attach additional page with a list)
-10' to +6' NAVD88 (approx. 4.9' above MHW)
®NHW or ❑NWL
e. Vegetation on tract
Primary and secondary dune vegetation
f. Man-made features and uses now on tract
Dune walkovers
g. Identify and describe the existing land uses adjacent to the proposed project site.
Developed - residential
h. How does local government zone the tract?
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable zoning?
N/A
(Attach zoning compliance certificate, if applicable)
❑Yes ❑No ®NA
j. Is the proposed activity part of an urban waterfront redevelopment proposal? ❑Yes ®No
k. Hasa professional archaeological assessment been done for the tract?
If yes, attach a copy. ®Yes ❑No ❑NA
If yes, by whom?
Mid -Atlantic Technology
Corporation (Wes Hall)
252-808.2808 .. 1-888-4RCOAST .. www.nccoastalmanagement.net

Form DCM MP -1 (Page 3 of 5)
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
Assessment is included in the
FEIS
I. Is the proposed project located in a National Registered Historic District or does it involve a ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
National Register listed or eligible property?
<Form continues on next page>
m. (i) Are there wetlands on the site? ❑Yes ®No
(ii) Are there coastal wetlands on the site? ❑Yes ®No
(iii) If yes to either (i) or (ii) above, has a delineation been conducted? ❑Yes ®No
(Attach documentation, if available)
n. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
All wastewater treatment is by on-site systems
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
Each municipality has its own water supply system utilizing deep groundwater wells
p. Describe existing stone water management or treatment systems.
No impervious area - all stormwater infiltrates on the beach
5. Activities and Impacts
a. Will the project be for commercial, public, or private use?
❑Commercial ®Public/Govemment
❑Private/Community
b. Give a brief description of purpose, use, and daily operations of the project when complete.
See attached project narrative
c. Describe the proposed construction methodology, types of construction equipment to be used during construction, the number of each type
of equipment and where it is to be stored.
See attached project narrative
d. List all development activities you propose.
Excavation and filling by Hopper Dredge, Pipeline, and Truck Haul: Beach Nourishment
e. Are the proposed activities maintenance of an existing project, new work, or both?
Maintenance of Existing Project
f. What is the approximate total disturbed land area resulting from the proposed project?
48,437,395 sq. ft. (50 yr project);
15,509,300 sq. ft. (BBMBNP Project
#1) ®Sq.Ft or []Acres
g. Will the proposed project encroach on any public easement, public accessway or other area
❑Yes ®No [INA
that the public has established use of?
252-808-2808 .. 1-888-4RCOAST .. www.nccoastaimanagement.net

Form DCM MP -1 (Page 4 of 5)
h. Describe location and type of existing and proposed discharges to waters of the state.
Dredge slurry discharge of approximately 75% water and 25% sand
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
i. Will wastewater or stormwater be discharged into a wetland? ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
If yes, will this discharged water be of the same salinity as the receiving water? ❑Yes ❑No ®NA
j. Is there any mitigation proposed? ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
If yes, attach a mitigation proposal.
<Form continues on back>
6. Additional Information
In addition to this completed application form, (MP -1) the following items below, if applicable, must be submitted in order for the application
package to be complete. Items (a) — (f) are always applicable to any major development application. Please consult the application
instruction booklet on how to properly prepare the required items below.
a. A project narrative.
b. An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale. Please give the present status of the
proposed project. Is any portion already complete? If previously authorized work, clearly indicate on maps, plats, drawings to distinguish
between work completed and proposed.
c. A site or location map that is sufficiently detailed to guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the site.
d. A copy of the deed (with state application only) or other instrument under which the applicant claims title to the affected properties.
e. The appropriate application fee. Check or money order made payable to DENR.
f. A list of the names and complete addresses of the adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and signed return receipts as proof that such
owners have received a copy of the application and plats by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised that they have 30 days in
which to submit comments on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal Management.
Name NIA - All towns have easements for beach fill projects Phone No.
Address
Name Phone No.
Address
Name Phone No.
Address
g. A list of previous state or federal permits issued for work on the project tract. Include permit numbers, permittee, and issuing dates.
CAMA Permit # 124-01, # 181-06, # 86-12
USACE Permit # 200000362, # 198000291
h. Signed consultant or agent authorization forth, if applicable.
i. Wetland delineation, if necessary.
j. A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in oceanfront and inlet areas. (Must be signed by property owner)
k. A statement of compliance with the N.C. Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A 1-10), if necessary. If the project involves expenditure
of public funds or use of public lands, attach a statement documenting compliance with the North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
1 7. Certification and Permission to Enter on Land I
I understand that any permit issued in response to this application will allow only the development described in the application.
The project will be subject to the conditions and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact grant permission to representatives of state and federal review agencies to
enter on the aforementioned lands in connection with evaluating information related to this permit application and follow-up
monitoring of the project.
I further certify that the information provided in this application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
252-808-2808 .. 1-888-4RCOAST .. www.nccoastalmanagement.net

Form DCM MP -1 (Page 5 of 5)
Date 5/25/2018 Print Name Greg Rudolph
Signature
Please indicate application attachments pertaining to your proposed project.
®DCM MP -2 Excavation and Fill Information ❑DCM MP -5 Bridges and Culverts
❑DCM MP -3 Upland Development
❑DCM MP -4 Structures Information
APPLICATION for
Major Development Permit
252-808-2808 .. 1-888-4RCOAST .. www.nccoastalmanagement.net

NCDCM MP -2 FORM
(50 YR PROJECT)

Form DCM MP -2
EXCAVATION and FILL
(Except for bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP -1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation and/or fill activities. All values should be given in feet.
11. EXCAVATION [I This section not applicable
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below NHW or NWL in
cubic yards.
51.6 Mcy (BBMBNP 50 Year Project)
c. (i) Does the area to be excavated include coastal wetlandstmarsh
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
[]CW []SAV ❑SB
OWL ®None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
b. Type of material to be excavated.
Medium sand (see attached project narrative)
d. High -ground excavation in cubic yards.
None
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL [I This section not applicable
a. Location of disposal area. b. Dimensions of disposal area.
Ocean shoreline - Towns of Emerald Isle, Indian Beach, Average: 1,012,252 ft long x 319 ft wide; Range: 674,835 ft
Salter Path, Pine Knoll Shores, and Atlantic Beach - 2,024,504 ft long x 288 ft - 398 ft wide (over 50 years)
c. (i) Do you claim title to disposal area?
❑Yes ®No ❑NA
(ii) If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner.
d. (i) Will a disposal area be available for future maintenance?
®Yes ❑No [INA
(ii) If yes, where?
Along entire length as needed for maintenance
e. (i) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh f. (i) Does the disposal include any area in the water?
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), ®Yes []No [INA
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
(ii) If yes, how much water area is affected?
252-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastalmanagement.net revised: 12/26/06
Access
Other
Channel
Canal
Boat Basin
Boat Ramp
Rock Groin
Rock
(excluding
(NLW or
Breakwater
shoreline
NWL)
stabilization
Avg:
1,012,252 ft
Length
Range:
674,835 ft -
2,024,504 ft
(over 50 yrs)
Avg: 319 ft
Width
Range: 288 ft
- 398 ft (over
50 yrs)
Avg. Existing
NA
NA
-2' NAVD
Depth
Final Project
NA
NA
+6' NAVD &
Depth
Below
11. EXCAVATION [I This section not applicable
a. Amount of material to be excavated from below NHW or NWL in
cubic yards.
51.6 Mcy (BBMBNP 50 Year Project)
c. (i) Does the area to be excavated include coastal wetlandstmarsh
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
[]CW []SAV ❑SB
OWL ®None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
b. Type of material to be excavated.
Medium sand (see attached project narrative)
d. High -ground excavation in cubic yards.
None
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL [I This section not applicable
a. Location of disposal area. b. Dimensions of disposal area.
Ocean shoreline - Towns of Emerald Isle, Indian Beach, Average: 1,012,252 ft long x 319 ft wide; Range: 674,835 ft
Salter Path, Pine Knoll Shores, and Atlantic Beach - 2,024,504 ft long x 288 ft - 398 ft wide (over 50 years)
c. (i) Do you claim title to disposal area?
❑Yes ®No ❑NA
(ii) If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner.
d. (i) Will a disposal area be available for future maintenance?
®Yes ❑No [INA
(ii) If yes, where?
Along entire length as needed for maintenance
e. (i) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh f. (i) Does the disposal include any area in the water?
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), ®Yes []No [INA
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
(ii) If yes, how much water area is affected?
252-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastalmanagement.net revised: 12/26/06

Form DCM MP -2 (Excavation and Fill, Page 2 of 3)
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV OSB _
❑WL ®None
(ii) Describe the purpose of disposal in these areas:
Average: 3,277 acres; Range: 2,649 acres - 7,669 acres (over
50 years)
a. Type of shoreline stabilization: b. Length: Average: 1,012.252 ft: Range: 674,835 ft - 2.024,504 ft
❑Bulkhead ❑Riprap ❑Breakwater/Sill ®Other: beach (over 50 years)
Nourishment Width: Average: 319 ft: Range: 288 ft - 398 ft (over 50 years)
c. Average distance waterward of NHW or NWL: 260' d. Maximum distance waterward of NHW or NWL: 339'
e. Type of stabilization material: f.
Medium sand (see attached project narrative)
(i) Has there been shoreline erosion during preceding 12
months?
®Yes ❑No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, state amount of erosion and source of erosion amount
information.
g. Number of square feet of fill to be placed below water level. h. Type of fill material.
Bulkhead backfill Riprap Medium sand (see attached project narrative)
Breakwater/Sill Other Average: 142.727.557 soft:
Range: 115.396.749 soft - 334,043.219 soft (over 50 years)
i. Source of fill material.
Morehead City Harbor ODMDS (Old and Current), Area Y, Area Z,
Bogue Inlet Channel, Morehead City Outer Harbor, AIVWV
Disposal Areas, and Upland sand Mines
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES ❑This section not applicable
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. (i) Will fill material be brouqht to the site? ®Yes ❑No 0 N b. (i) Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands/marsh (CW),
If yes,
(ii) Amount of material to be placed in the water Average:
34,320,410 cv: Range: 32,448,756 cv - 37,020,087 cv (over 50
ears
(iii) Dimensions of fill area Average: 1,012,252 ft long x 319 ft
wide: Range: 674,835 ft - 2,024,504 ft long x 288 ft - 398 ft wide
(over 50 years)
(iv) Purpose of fill
Shoreline protection
submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or
other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL ®None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the fill in these areas:
5. GENERAL
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion b. What type of construction equipment will be used (e.g., dragline,
controlled? backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
see attached project narrative Hopper Dredge or Pipeline Dredge
c. (i) Will navigational aids be required as a result of the project? d. (i) Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project
❑Yes ®No [INA site? ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, explain what type and how they will be implemented. (ii) If yes, explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts.
252-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastaimanag!prpqnt.net revised: 12126,106

Form DCM MP -2 (Excavation and Fill, Page 3 of 3)
4/6/2018
Date
Bogue Banks Master Beach Nourishment Plan
Project Name
Greg Rudolph
Applicant Name
Applicant Signature
252-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastaimanagement.net revised: 12126/06

NCDCM MP -2 FORM
(BBMBNP PROJECT #1)

Form DCM MP -2
EXCAVATION and FILL
(Except for bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major Permit, Form DCM MP -1. Be sure to complete all other sections of the Joint
Application that relate to this proposed project. Please include all supplemental information.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation and/or fill activities. All values should be given in feet.
1.
Access
C1 This section not applicable
a.
Amount of material to be excavated from below NHW or NWL in
b. Type of material to be excavated.
Other
medium sand (see attached project narrative)
Channel
Canal
Boat Basin
Boat Ramp
Rock Groin
Rock
(excluding
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
(NLW or
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
Breakwater
shoreline
NWL)
OWL ®None
stabilization)
Length
Z.
DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL
❑This section not applicable
a.
Location of disposal area.
b. Dimensions of disposal area.
50,030 ft
Width
50,030 ft long x 310 ft wide; Avg Berm Width = 56 ft (35 ft -
Beach, Salter Path, and Pine Knoll Shores
85 ft)
c.
(i) Do you claim title to disposal area?
310 ft
Avg. Existing
❑Yes ®No [INA
®Yes ❑No ❑NA
(ii) If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner.
NA
NA
-2' NAVD
Depth
Final Project
NA
NA
+6' NAVD &
Depth
Below
1.
EXCAVATION
C1 This section not applicable
a.
Amount of material to be excavated from below NHW or NWL in
b. Type of material to be excavated.
cubic yards.
medium sand (see attached project narrative)
1,974,740 cy from Current or Old ODMDS (BBMBNP Project #1)
c.
(i) Does the area to be excavated include coastal wetlands/marsh
d. High -ground excavation in cubic yards.
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
None
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
[_]CW ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL ®None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the excavation in these areas:
Z.
DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED MATERIAL
❑This section not applicable
a.
Location of disposal area.
b. Dimensions of disposal area.
Oceanfront shoreline - Towns of Emerald Isle, Indian
50,030 ft long x 310 ft wide; Avg Berm Width = 56 ft (35 ft -
Beach, Salter Path, and Pine Knoll Shores
85 ft)
c.
(i) Do you claim title to disposal area?
d. (i) Will a disposal area be available for future maintenance?
❑Yes ®No [INA
®Yes ❑No ❑NA
(ii) If no, attach a letter granting permission from the owner.
(ii) If yes, where?
Along entire length as needed for maintenance
(i) Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands/marsh
(CW), submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB),
or other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
❑CW ❑SAV ❑SB
OWL ®None
(ii) Describe the purpose of disposal in these areas:
(i) Does the disposal include any area in the water?
®Yes ❑No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, how much water area is affected?
128.5 acres below MHW; 41.9 acres below MLW
252-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.ncco,astAtmAnAg-,nient.net revised: 12.26/06

Form DCM MP -2 (Exc-avatjan ind Eiji, Rage 2 of 3)
a. Type of shoreline stabilization:
b. Length: 50.030 ft
❑Bulkhead ❑Riprap ❑Breakwater/Sill ®Other: Beach
Width: 310 ft
Nourishment
c. Average distance waterward of NHW or NWL: existing to
d. Maximum distance waterward of NHW or NWL: existing to
proposed MHW: Avg = 99 ft'
propsed MHW: Max = 123 ft
e. Type of stabilization material:
f. (i) Has there been shoreline erosion during preceding 12
medium sand (see attached project narrative)
months?
[]Yes ®No [INA
(ii) If yes, state amount of erosion and source of erosion amount
information.
g. Number of square feet of fill to be placed below water level.
In. Type of fill material.
Bulkhead backfill Riprap
medium sand (see attached project narrative)
Breakwater/Sill Other 5,597.460 sq. ft. below MHW;
1,825,164 sg. ft. below MLW
i. Source of fill material.
Current and Old Morehead City Harbor ODMDS (see attached
project narrative)
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES []This section not applicable
(Excluding Shoreline Stabilization)
a. (i) Will fill material be brought to the site? ®Yes ❑No 0 N b. (i) Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands/marsh (CW),
If yes,
(ii) Amount of material to be placed in the water 889.900 cv
below MHW: 240.400 cv below MLW
(iii) Dimensions of fill area 50,030 ft long x 310 ft wide
(iv) Purpose of fill
Shoreline protection
submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), shell bottom (SB), or
other wetlands (WL)? If any boxes are checked, provide the
number of square feet affected.
[:]CW ❑SAV ❑SB
❑WL ®None
(ii) Describe the purpose of the fill in these areas:
5. GENERAL
a. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site and erosion b. What type of construction equipment will be used (e.g., dragline,
controlled? backhoe, or hydraulic dredge)?
see attached project narrative Hopper Dredge
c. (i) Will navigational aids be required as a result of the project?
❑Yes ®No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, explain what type and how they will be implemented.
5/25/2018
Date
Bogue Banks Master Beach Nourishment Plan
d. (i) Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment to project
site? ❑Yes ®No ❑NA
(ii) If yes, explain steps that will be taken to avoid or minimize
environmental impacts.
Project Name
252-808-2808 :: 1 -883-4RCL° AST :: w_-ww.nccoasta-imana_qenaerpt.net revised: 12 26rfl6

Form DCM MP -2 (Excavation and Fill, Page 3 of 3)
Greg Rudolph
Applicant Name
Applicant Signature
252-808-2808 :: 1-888-4RCOAST :: www.nccoastaimanagement.net revised: 12/26/06

PERMIT NARRATIVE
(see electronic copy for appendices)

CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH NOURISHMENT PLAN
NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Carteret County, the Carteret County Beach Commission, and the Shore Protection Office (SPO)
seek to provide long-term, sustaining management of Bogue Banks beaches. In 2001, by state
legislation, the Carteret County Beach Commission was established, and a room occupancy tax
(ROT) for funding beach nourishment and related functions was put in place mainly as a
response to the hurricanes of the 1990's (Bertha, Fran and Floyd) and subsequent storms.
Carteret County intends to maintain Bogue Banks beaches via implementation of this proposed
Master Beach Nourishment Plan (MBNP) with guidance from the SPO and oversight by the
Beach Commission.
Carteret County is specifically seeking federal and state permits to allow implementation of this
MBNP as a non-federal shoreline protection and inlet management project over a multi-decadal
period to preserve Bogue Banks' tax base, infrastructure, and tourist -oriented economy. An
inter -local agreement was developed and executed by each municipality on Bogue Banks
creating an effective and efficient approach for a long-term and sustainable implementation of
this MBNP.
The proposed program incorporates actions within multiple oceanfront municipalities to nourish
recipient beaches, via use of multiple sand sources, over a multi-decadal timeline with revolving
nourishment -project events. This MBNP identifies engineering design elements including: sand
volumes required to yield the desired level of protection throughout Bogue Banks; sand volume
triggers to initiate nourishment events; sand borrow source locations, volumes, quality, and
viability; the expected capacity of the recipient beaches for nourishment; and the projected
timing of nourishment events. A primary MBNP goal is to offset natural and anthropogenic
erosion effects by optimizing use of existing high quality borrow sources to nourish prioritized
recipient beaches to provide a spatially -equivalent level of protection to upland property along
Bogue Banks.
2.0 PURPOSE AND NEED
2.1 Project Purpose
The Bogue Banks Master Beach Nourishment Plan (MBNP) project purpose is:
• to establish a regional plan to facilitate authorization and implementation of shoreline
nourishment/maintenance events on Bogue Banks including management of Bogue
Inlet;
• to provide long-term shoreline stabilization on Bogue Banks to:

provide an equivalent level of storm protection to upland property along Bogue
Banks and the associated local, state, and federal tax bases;
to provide long-term protection to Bogue Banks tourism industry, State and local
infrastructure, and oceanfront or inlet adjacent structures
maintain natural resources and associated recreational uses while avoiding and
minimizing adverse environmental impacts to the extent feasible;
• to consolidate community resources to financially and logistically manage beaches on
Bogue Banks and manage Bogue Inlet in an effective manner by reducing/eliminating
the time and need for individual authorizations.
2.2 Project Need
After pronounced hurricane activity in the 1990's (Hurricanes Bertha, Fran, and Floyd), Carteret
County leadership began to take formal steps to address erosion concerns along the —25 -mile
long island of Bogue Banks. Figure 2-1 shows some of the damage from these hurricanes.
Figure 2-1: 1990's Hurricane Damage
In 1984, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) conducted a Reconnaissance Study
relative to Coastal Storm Damage Reduction (CSDR) for Bogue Banks, but none of the analyzed
coastal storm damage reduction plans were found to be economically feasible at that time
(USACE, 2013). A USACE Feasibility Study was authorized by congressional resolution in 1998
and a Feasibility Study Agreement was executed in February 2001 after which federal funding
became available; the Feasibility Study culminated in the August 2013 report - "Integrated
Feasibility Report and Draft Environmental Impact Statement" for the USACE CSDR project for
Bogue Banks. Congressional authorization and federal funding for this project are unlikely and
FA

remain uncertain due to lack of financial support by the present and prior administrations relative
to the Shore Protection Program for ultimate implementation of the project.
In 1994, a USACE Section 111 Study was requested by Pine Knoll Shores to determine if
damages to the beach can be directly attributable to the Federal Navigation Project (SPO
website). In 2001, the USACE completed a Section 111 Study that addressed the impacts of
dredging Morehead City Harbor upon the beaches of Bogue Banks. The study found no direct
evidence that the harbor project has had a negative impact on any of the shorelines in the
vicinity, including Pine Knoll Shores. However, the report suggested that alternative sand
management practices in conjunction with harbor maintenance may be beneficial with regard to
long-term stability of the shoreline (USACE, 2001).
However, with the advent of the hurricanes in the 1990's, County and Town leaders determined
that action was needed. Occupancy tax legislation was developed to create a beach nourishment
reserve fund and a County -wide Beach Commission was formed to manage the funds and make
decisions regarding engineering intervention (i.e. nourishment) along Bogue Banks.
Consultants were retained by the Beach Commission to develop and implement the previous
locally -funded Bogue Banks Restoration Project which placed material, in three phases, along
Bogue Banks: Phase I) Indian Beach/Salter Path and Pine Knoll Shores (1.73 Mcy, 2002), Phase
II) Emerald Isle Central and Emerald Isle East (1.87 Mcy, 2003), and Phase III) Emerald Isle
West (0.69 Mcy, 2005) (see Figure 2-2).
In 2003, the USACE completed a Section 933 study investigating the beneficial placement of
beach fill to be obtained by maintenance dredging of the Morehead City Harbor navigation
project and by recycling previously dredged material from the adjacent Brandt Island confined
disposal area (USACE, 2013). Phase I of the Section 933 project (2004) placed approximately
700,000 cy of material in Indian Beach/Salter Path while Phase II (2007) placed approximately
508,000 cy of material in Pine Knoll Shores (see Figure 2-2).
In 2004 and 2007, two FEMA -funded restoration efforts were undertaken due to storm damage
from Hurricanes Isabel and Ophelia, respectively. These efforts resulted in the placement of
about 1.4 Mcy of sand along Bogue Banks. Most recently, in 2013, a post -Irene restoration
project, partially funded by FEMA, was constructed, placing approximately 965,000 cy of sand
along Bogue Banks (see Figure 2-2).
In 2010, the USACE completed a "Dredged Material Management Plan" for the Morehead City
Harbor navigation project. The base plan includes periodic placement of material on Fort
Macon, Atlantic Beach, and west through Pine Knoll Shores at regular intervals to ameliorate the
losses of material that would normally have been provided through natural sand bypassing
currently interrupted by the navigation project" (USACE, 2010). This plan resulted in a 3 year
nourishment cycle placing sand on Atlantic Beach and Fort Macon in 2011, 2014, and 2017.
Since 1978 roughly 14 million cubic yards of sand have been placed upon the beaches of Bogue
Banks — as illustrated in Figure 2-2 - at a total cost of about $124 million. While the Corps of
Engineers' Dredged Material Management Plan and Interim Operation Plan for the Morehead
3

City Harbor Federal Navigation Project hold some promise for eastern Bogue Banks, long-term
beach nourishment for the entire island is needed to provide for pro -active management of
County beaches.
C 0.5 1 2.
_..
-
`
� SIN-
°/.
- Emerald Isle
_________ --- _______ r_________________ - _ - _ _ _
1 Emerald Isle 1 Emerald Isle Indian Beaasta - _
Pine Knill BMAe
- Allanhc
Inlet
West
' Central r Et ' Salter Path � �
Beach
17
f1iTv�1a�La 1J04-
seIr.m -1 o
B
as
j
,
30,000 IV
56,000
17
^. 33,000 cy
j
71,000 cy
s 39,000 cy
a. 48,000 cy
16,000 cy
-
cy
456,994 cy
1,276.586 cy,867,726
59,000 cy
699,282 cy
690,868 cy
s 71,000 cy _
4— 432,820 cy ---- ► 75,119 cy
304,037 cy
344A1Ory
319,113 cy
73,397 cy 188,879 cy
u
148793 ry
74.000 cy ,. ..
.... .. ... ___7— -_-.
.. -.....
' 198,190cy.
451
315,221 cy
�. 50,000 cy _
4
1,174,600 ry
2,472,132."Y, 2. 192,269 cy
209,348 cy
2,390,000 cy 530,729 cy
184,828 cy
799,504cy 547,1%cy
522,518 cy 585.067 cy
621,000 ry 150.000 cy
Bogue Inlet AnM Cnnaing Ohposal aaa� Beaus Ban, Restenliu - Phase 111
Bogue Banks Beach Nourishment Projects AIWW T.ngent B 06".1 e' Sac[bn 933-Phasel
MCN Innes 11 -be, Maiman . Dredge Oisposal a S tbn T13 -Ph -11
1978 _ 201 BnMtleland Pvnp-Out a� FEMAPnu-habel lta C tbn
7 v 1 Hogue Banef RefMntlon st
Phue 1 FEMA Po-Ophelia Res ration
Bear Bogue Banes Restoration Phae11 aa� Post4— Resmntion
Figure 2-2: Beach Nourishment Project Completed Since 1978 Along Bogue Banks
3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The MBNP and preferred alternative of Beach Nourishment with Non-structural Inlet
Management include the following elements:
• Renourishment events are expected to be required at 3, 6, and 9 -year intervals starting in
2019 - based upon average background erosion rates. Actual renourishment events will
be dependent upon actual erosion, and available funding — including FEMA funding in
response to future storms for which the timing and severity cannot be reasonably
predicted.
• Sand from offshore sources (1St priority), inlet sources (2nd priority) and upland sources
(3`d priority) is proposed to be excavated and placed on the beach. These primary sand
sources are sufficient to maintain the design beach at a 25 -year LoP with advance fill
varying from 25 to 50 cubic yards per foot — depending upon actual future erosion rates
and available funding.
• Sand obtained from the USACE maintenance dredging of the Morehead City Harbor
Channel and Bogue Inlet AIWW "crossings" is proposed to be used as part of the
4

primary sand sources; maintenance dredging is proposed to be performed by the USACE
under their permit authority, but USACE dredging and beach -fill placement are assumed
to continue and are an integral part of the MBNP.
• If the main channel at Bogue Inlet migrates outside the "safe box", the main channel is
proposed to be relocated by the Applicant, Carteret County, to the location constructed in
2005 with the excavated material used to nourish the beach as part of the primary sand
sources.
3.1 Project Volume Need
3.1.1 Background Erosion
A statistical analysis using historical monitoring data to calculate annual volume change (1999 —
2012) showed an overall annual background erosion loss along Bogue Banks (without Fort
Macon) of roughly 452,200 cy with a 50 -yr nourishment need of approximately 22.6 Mcy just to
keep up with historical erosion patterns. The volume analysis indicated that renourishment
intervals, based on background erosion rates, in multiples of 3 years (i.e. every 3, 6, or 9 years
depending on the reach) would be required to maintain a 25 -year level of protection along Bogue
Banks. Table 3-1 and Figure 3-1 present the preliminary proposed projects over the next 50
years. Please note that the nourishment volume approximates the need for background erosion
only.
Table 3-1: Renourishment Intervals and Preliminary Projects Based on Detailed
Subreach and Management Reach Approaches
Year
Detailed Subreach
Nourishment
Volume (c)
Management Reach
Nourishment
Volume (c)
Nourishment
Protect (Yr)
2019
640,332
686,067
3
2022
1,686,018
1,839,351
6
2025
1,163,781
967,920
9
2028
1,686,018
1,839,351
6
2031
640,332
686,067
3
2034
2,209,467
2,121,204
6,9
2037
640,332
686,067
3
2040
1,686,018
1,839,351
6
2043
1,163,781
967,920
9
2046
1,686,018
1,839,351
6
2049
640,332
686,067
3
2052
2,209,467
2,121,204
6,9
2055
640,332
686,067
3
2058
1,686,018
1,839,351
6
2061
1,163,781
967,920
9
2064
1 1,686,018 1
1,8391351
6
TOTAL
1 21,228,045 1
21,612,609

�(1-111
ONSLOW SAY
Legend
— Year 3 Nourishment
f—+ Year 6 Nourishment
— Year 9 Nourishment
0 05 1 2 3
m Mika
Figure 3-1: Management Reach Nourishment Plan
3.1.2 Storm Erosion
To estimate storm losses, a similar statistical analysis to the background erosion was performed
but the overall dataset was restricted to the three years which covered Hurricanes Isabel, Ophelia,
and Irene to estimate potential hurricane storm losses. Based on the results, it is expected that
the losses experienced for a given storm may range between 1.4 — 1.7 Mcy. Given that storms
have occurred approximately once every three years, the storm need over 50 years may range
between 22.4 — 27.2 Mcy.
3.1.3 Sea Level Rise
Based on USACE guidance for intermediate sea level change of +1.01 ft over the next 50 years,
it was determined that the additional volume required to raise the dune and berm elevations
roughly 1 foot to maintain the 25 -year level of protection is approximately 1.8 Mcy.
3.1.4 Total Erosion
Based on the overall sediment need comprised of background erosion (22.6 Mcy),
anticipated storm erosion (22.4 — 27.2 Mcy), and moderate sea level rise (1.8 Mcy), Carteret
County is requesting permission to place 46.8 to 51.6 Mcy of material on the beach over the
next 50 years. As mentioned previously, a combination of borrow sources which include
offshore sources (Old and Current ODMDS, Area Y, and Area Z), inlets (Bogue Inlet Channel
and Morehead City Outer Harbor), and upland sources (sand mines and AIWW disposal areas)
would be used to meet this need (see Section 5.0 for sediment analysis).
C1
- -
--a--,—�.•Laaa•
8 66.
_
RrA11l. a-sa
0��.a
BBQ_
184 75c
272 4a.
•
90.{70cy
454.935cy
-
-�.
^r+S �Za
RR4�i•
a551 ZO
315.402 r-^/
pine W+c4 $110 nes
Atlantic Beech
K ••R. A j. a •
t9Icdan
geacN
Path
(59-761
(77-102)
a , a r
151135 c
Ead
Salter
(44561
` r
' aO,
'2 41
id a
E k31 AB)
._t ►.-c
W
n 51
GenVel
Emera 1�6.361
est
$slagta b215W
�(1-111
ONSLOW SAY
Legend
— Year 3 Nourishment
f—+ Year 6 Nourishment
— Year 9 Nourishment
0 05 1 2 3
m Mika
Figure 3-1: Management Reach Nourishment Plan
3.1.2 Storm Erosion
To estimate storm losses, a similar statistical analysis to the background erosion was performed
but the overall dataset was restricted to the three years which covered Hurricanes Isabel, Ophelia,
and Irene to estimate potential hurricane storm losses. Based on the results, it is expected that
the losses experienced for a given storm may range between 1.4 — 1.7 Mcy. Given that storms
have occurred approximately once every three years, the storm need over 50 years may range
between 22.4 — 27.2 Mcy.
3.1.3 Sea Level Rise
Based on USACE guidance for intermediate sea level change of +1.01 ft over the next 50 years,
it was determined that the additional volume required to raise the dune and berm elevations
roughly 1 foot to maintain the 25 -year level of protection is approximately 1.8 Mcy.
3.1.4 Total Erosion
Based on the overall sediment need comprised of background erosion (22.6 Mcy),
anticipated storm erosion (22.4 — 27.2 Mcy), and moderate sea level rise (1.8 Mcy), Carteret
County is requesting permission to place 46.8 to 51.6 Mcy of material on the beach over the
next 50 years. As mentioned previously, a combination of borrow sources which include
offshore sources (Old and Current ODMDS, Area Y, and Area Z), inlets (Bogue Inlet Channel
and Morehead City Outer Harbor), and upland sources (sand mines and AIWW disposal areas)
would be used to meet this need (see Section 5.0 for sediment analysis).
C1

3.2 Project Dimensions
Several template scenarios were developed to estimate potential project lengths and footprints
(bottom areas) for permitting purposes. Project templates equating to 25 cy/ft, 50 cy/ft, and 75
cy/ft fill densities were developed to produce a range of project lengths and footprints that may
be encountered over the 50 -year timeframe for both background erosion and storm related
projects. Fill volumes from Table 3-1 were used to develop the range of project lengths and
footprints for projects related to background erosion losses. As mentioned previously, historical
storm erosion has proven to be approximately 1.4 Mcy — 1.7 Mcy per event with events
occurring approximately every 3 years. Therefore, 1.7 Mcy every 3 years was used to develop
the range of project lengths and footprints for projects related to storm erosion losses. To
incorporate sea level rise in, which was estimated to be 1.8 Mcy over 50 years, that volume was
split evenly between background and storm erosion over the course of 50 years, adding
approximately 56,250 cy to each potential project. Using these volumes, the length of project
was determined for each fill density as well as the size of the project footprint, or bottom area.
The various templates produced a range of project length and bottom area values to describe the
size of potential future projects.
At the request of permitting authorities, minimum and maximum project lengths and bottom
areas were identified for any 6 -year or I0 -year period as well as the minimum and maximum for
the full 50 -year project authorization. In addition, ranges were identified separately for
background erosion and storm erosion to maintain consistency with the EIS. It should be noted
that renourishment placement locations will be repeated over the 50 -year project authorization
(i.e. sand placed in the same location more than once). Therefore, the total renourishment length
and bottom area sizes may incorporate the same location more than once, creating a seemingly
larger area of impact than what the projects might cover.
The following sections present summary tables of the 6 -year, 10 -year, and 50 -year ranges for
project length and bottom area. Tables containing the full analysis for those ranges identified
above are presented in Appendix A (Supporting Tables). Typical plan view and cross section
views are presented in Appendix B (Plan & Cross Section View) for renourishment events
containing a fill density of 25 cy/ft, 50 cy/ft, and 75 cy/ft.
3.2.1 6 Year Project Dimension Range
Table 3-2, Table 3-3, and Table 3-4 present the minimum and maximum nourishment lengths
and bottom areas for fill densities of 25 cy/ft, 50 cy/ft, and 75 cy/ft over any 6 year time period
for background erosion losses, storm erosion losses, and total losses (background + storm),
respectively. As can be seen, the lowest fill density of 25 cy/ft lends itself to the largest
nourishment length and thus, the largest bottom area covered. Conversely, the highest fill
density of 75 cy/ft lends itself to the smallest nourishment length and thus, the smallest bottom
area covered. It should be noted that during any 6 -year period, which may include 2 projects
stemming from background erosion and 2 projects stemming from storm events, certain locations
may be nourished more than once. Therefore, the total nourishment length and bottom area sizes
may incorporate the same location more than once, creating a seemingly larger area of influence
than what will be impacted.
7

Table 3-2: 6 Year Nourishment Volume, Length, and Bottom Area — Background
Erosion Only
6 YEAR NOURISHMENT LENGTH AND BOTTOM AREA RANGES -BACKGROUND EROSION ONLY
Total Nourishment Volume
25 cy/ft Fill Density
50 cy/ft Flll Density
75 cy/ft Fill Density
Bottom Bottom
Total Nourishment Volume
Bottom
Bottom
2Scy/ft Fill Density
Bottom
Bottom
75 cy/ft Fill Density
75 cy/ft Fill Density
Total
Background+
Total
Bottom
Bottom
Total
Background
Sea Level Total
Nourishment Area Area
Nourishment
Area
Area
Bottom
Nourishment Area
Area
Sea Level
Minor
Nourishment
Rise Nourishment
Bottom
Length Above Below
Length
Above
Below
Bottom
Length Above
Below
Bottom
Max
Volume (cy)
(cy) (cy)
Area
(mi) MHW MHW
(mi)
MHW
MHW
Area
(mi) MHW
MHW
Area
Area
Below
Bottom
(acres)
Area
Above
Area
Below
Bottom
(acres)
Area
Below
Bottom
(acres)
Volume (cy)
(cy)
(acres) (acres)
(mi)
(acres)
(acres)
Area
(acres)
(acres)
MHW
MIN 2,525,418
112,500 2,637,918
20.0 298 400 69810.0
MHW
216
171
386
6.7 183
138
321
MAX 2,807,271
112,500 2,919,771
22.1 330 442 772
11.1
239
189
428
7.4 203
153
356
Table 3-3: 6 Year Nourishment Volume, Length, and Bottom Area — Storm Erosion
Only
Table 3-4: 6 Year Nourishment Volume, Length, and Bottom Area — Background &
Storm Erosion
6 YEAR NOURISHMENT LENGTH AND BOTTOM AREA RANGES - STORM EROSION ONLY
Total Nourishment Volume
Total Nourishment Volume
2Scy/ft Fill Density
/ft Fill Density
SOcy/ft Fill Density
75 cy/ft Fill Density
75 cy/ft Fill Density
Background+
Bottom
Bottom
Bottom
Bottom
Bottom
Bottom
Bottom
Bottom
Bottom
Bottom
Bottom
Bottom
Storm
Sea Level
Total
Nourishment Area
Area
Bottom
Nourishment
Area
Total
Bottom
Nourishment Area
Area
Total
Rise
Total
Min or
Storm
Nourishment
Sea Level
Rise
Total
Nourishment
Nourishment Area
Length Above
Area
Below
Bottom
Nourishment
Length
Area
Above
Area
Below
Bottom
Nourishment Area
Length Above
Area
Below
Bottom
Max
Volume (cy)
(cy)
(cy)
(mi)
MHW
MHW
Area
(mi)
MHW
MHW
Area
(mi)
MHW
MHW
Area
(acres)
(acres)
(acres)
(acres)
(acres)
(acres)
(acres)
(aces)
(ares)
(awes)
(acres)
(aces)
(acres)
(acres)
(acres)
5,925,418
225,000
(acres)
(acres)
932
MIN
3,400,000
112,500
3,512,500
26.6
397
532
929
13.3
287
227
514
8.9
244
184
428
MAX
3,400,000
112,500
3,512,500
26.6
397
532
929
13.3
287
227
514
8.9
244
184
428
Table 3-4: 6 Year Nourishment Volume, Length, and Bottom Area — Background &
Storm Erosion
Based on Table 3-2, for projects stemming from background erosion, the minimum nourishment
length and bottom area for any 6 year time period are 6.7 miles and 321 acres (based on 75 cy/ft
fill density) and the maximum nourishment length and bottom area for any 6 year time period are
22.1 miles and 772 acres (based on 25 cy/ft fill density). It is expected that the fill density will
likely be in between 25 cy/ft and 75 cy/ft. Therefore, an average project length and bottom area
for any 6 -year period would be in the range of 10.0 — 11.1 miles and 171 — 189 acres (based on a
50 cy/ft fill density).
Based on Table 3-3, for projects stemming from storm erosion, the minimum nourishment length
and bottom area for any 6 year time period are 8.9 miles and 428 acres (based on 75 cy/ft fill
density) and the maximum nourishment length and bottom area for any 6 year time period are
26.6 miles and 929 acres (based on 25 cy/ft fill density). It is expected that the fill density will
likely be in between 25 cy/ft and 75 cy/ft. Therefore, an average project length and bottom area
for any 6 -year period would be in the range of 13.3 miles and 514 acres (based on 50 cy/ft fill
density).
Table 3-4 presents the total impact expected from background erosion and storm erosion for any
6 -year period. The minimum nourishment length and bottom area are 15.5 miles and 749 acres
(based on 75 cy/ft fill density) and the maximum nourishment length and bottom area'are 48.7
miles and 1,701 acres (based on 25 cy/ft fill density). It is expected that the fill density will
8
6 YEAR NOURISHMENT LENGTH AND BOTTOM AREA RANGES - TOTAL EROSION (BACKGROUND+STORM)
Total Nourishment Volume
25 cy/ft Fill Density
50
/ft Fill Density
75 cy/ft Fill Density
Background+
Bottom
Bottom
Total
Bottom
Bottom
Total
Bottom
Bottom
Total
Minor
Storm
Sea Level
Total
Nourishment Area
Area
Bottom
Nourishment
Area
Area
Bottom
Nourishment Area
Area
Bottom
Rise
Nourishment
Length Above
Below
Length
Above
Below
Length
Above
Below
Max
Nourishment
(cy)
(cy)
(mi) MHW
MHW
Area
(mi)
MHW
MHW
Area
(mi)
MHW
MHW
Area
Volume (cy)
(acres)
(acres)
(acres)
(acres)
(acres)
(aces)
(ares)
(aces)
(acres)
MIN
5,925,418
225,000
6,150,418
46.6 695
932
11627
23.3
503
398
901
15.5
427
322
749
MAX
6,207,271
225,000
6,432,271
48.7 727
975
1,701
24.4
526
416
942
16.2
447
337
784
Based on Table 3-2, for projects stemming from background erosion, the minimum nourishment
length and bottom area for any 6 year time period are 6.7 miles and 321 acres (based on 75 cy/ft
fill density) and the maximum nourishment length and bottom area for any 6 year time period are
22.1 miles and 772 acres (based on 25 cy/ft fill density). It is expected that the fill density will
likely be in between 25 cy/ft and 75 cy/ft. Therefore, an average project length and bottom area
for any 6 -year period would be in the range of 10.0 — 11.1 miles and 171 — 189 acres (based on a
50 cy/ft fill density).
Based on Table 3-3, for projects stemming from storm erosion, the minimum nourishment length
and bottom area for any 6 year time period are 8.9 miles and 428 acres (based on 75 cy/ft fill
density) and the maximum nourishment length and bottom area for any 6 year time period are
26.6 miles and 929 acres (based on 25 cy/ft fill density). It is expected that the fill density will
likely be in between 25 cy/ft and 75 cy/ft. Therefore, an average project length and bottom area
for any 6 -year period would be in the range of 13.3 miles and 514 acres (based on 50 cy/ft fill
density).
Table 3-4 presents the total impact expected from background erosion and storm erosion for any
6 -year period. The minimum nourishment length and bottom area are 15.5 miles and 749 acres
(based on 75 cy/ft fill density) and the maximum nourishment length and bottom area'are 48.7
miles and 1,701 acres (based on 25 cy/ft fill density). It is expected that the fill density will
8

likely be in between 25 cy/ft and 75 cy/ft. Therefore, an average project length and bottom area
would be in the range of 23.2 — 24.4 miles and 901 — 942 acres (based on 50 cy/ft fill density).
3.2.2 10 Year Project Dimension Range
Table 3-5, Table 3-6, and Table 3-7 present the minimum and maximum nourishment lengths
and bottom areas for fill densities of 25 cy/ft, 50 cy/ft, and 75 cy/ft over any 10 year time period
for background erosion losses, storm erosion losses, and total losses (background + storm),
respectively. As can be seen, the lowest fill density of 25 cy/ft lends itself to the largest
nourishment length and thus, the largest bottom area covered. Conversely, the highest fill
density of 75 cy/ft lends itself to the smallest nourishment length and thus, the smallest bottom
area covered. It should be noted that during any 10 -year period, which may include 3 projects
stemming from background erosion and 3 projects stemming from storm events, certain locations
may be renourished more than once. Therefore, the total nourishment length and bottom area
incorporate the same location more than once, creating a seemingly larger area of influence than
what will be impacted.
Table 3-5: 10 Year Nourishment Volume, Length, and Bottom Area — Background
Erosion Only
Table 3-6: 10 Year Nourishment Volume, Length, and Bottom Area — Storm Erosion
Only
Total Nourishment Volume
10 YEAR NOURISHMENT LENGTH AND BOTTOM AREA RANGES- BACKGROUND EROSION ONLY
W YEAR NOURISHMENT LENGTH AND BOTTOM AREA RANGES -STORM EROSION ONLY
75cy/ft Fill Density
Total Nourishment Volume
Bottom Bottom Total
25 cy/ft Fill Density
Bottom
25 cy/ft Fill Density
50cytft Fill Density
50 cy/ft Fill Density
Bottom Total
75 cY/ft Fill Density
7S cy/ft Fill Density
Nourishment
Area Area
Bottom
Nourishment
Area
Area
Bottom
Bottom
Bottom
Total
Total
Bottom
Bottom
Total
Total
Bottom
Bottom
Bottom
Bottom
Above
Background
Sea Level
Total
Nourishment Area
Area
Area
Nourishment
Area
Area
Area
Nourishment Area
Area
Area
o
Min r
Nourishment
Rise
Nourishment
Length
Above
Below
Bottom
Length
Above
Below
Bottom
Length
Above
Below
Bottom
Max
Volume (cy)
(cy)
(cy)
(mi)
MHW
MHW
Area
(mi)
MHW
MHW
Area
(ml)
MHW
MHW
Area
Area
(awes)
(acres)
(mss)
(acres)
(acres)
(acres)
(acres)
(acres)
(acres)
(acres)
(acres)
(acres)
(acres)
(acres)
(acres)
MIN
1 3,493,338
168,750
3,662,088
27.7
414
555
968
13.9
299
237
536
9.2
254
192
446
MAX
4,646,622
168,750
4,815,372
36.5
544
730
1,273
18.2
394
312
705
12.2
335
252
1 587
Table 3-6: 10 Year Nourishment Volume, Length, and Bottom Area — Storm Erosion
Only
Table 3-7: 10 Year Nourishment Volume, Length, and Bottom Area — Background &
Storm Erosion
10 YEAR NOURISHMENT LENGTH AND BOTTOM AREA RANG ES - TOTAL EROSION (BACKG ROUND +STORM)
Total Nourishment Volume
25 cy/ft Fill Density
W YEAR NOURISHMENT LENGTH AND BOTTOM AREA RANGES -STORM EROSION ONLY
75cy/ft Fill Density
Bottom Bottom Total
Total Nourishment Volume
Bottom
25 cy/ft Fill Density
50 cy/ft Fill Density
Bottom Total
Minor Storrs
Min
7S cy/ft Fill Density
Nourishment
Area Area
Bottom
Nourishment
Area
Area
Bottom
Nourishment
Bottom
Bottom
Total
Rise Nourishment
Bottom
Bottom
Total
Above
Bottom
Bottom
Bottom
Above
Below
Storm
Sea level
Total
Nourishment Area
Area
MHW
Nourishment
Area
Area
MHW Area
Nourishment Area
Area
Min or
Nourishment
Rise
Nourishment
Length
Above
Below
Bottom
Length
Above
Below
Bottom
Length
Above
Below
Bottom
Max
Volume (cy)
(cy)
(cy)
(mi)
MHW
MHW
Area
(ml)
MHW
MHW
Area
(mi)
MHW
MHW
Area
(acres)
(acres)
(acres)
(acres)
(acres)
(acres)
(acres)
(acres)
(acres)
MIN
15,100,000
168,750
5,268,750
39.9
595
798
1,393
20.0
431
341
772
13.3
366
276
642
MAX
5,100,000
168,750
5,268,750
39.9
595
798
1,393
20.0
431
341
772
13.3
366
276
642
Table 3-7: 10 Year Nourishment Volume, Length, and Bottom Area — Background &
Storm Erosion
10 YEAR NOURISHMENT LENGTH AND BOTTOM AREA RANG ES - TOTAL EROSION (BACKG ROUND +STORM)
Total Nourishment Volume
25 cy/ft Fill Density
SO q/ft Fill Density
75cy/ft Fill Density
Bottom Bottom Total
Bottom
Bottom Total
Bottom
Bottom Total
Minor Storrs
Min
Sea Level Total
Nourishment
Area Area
Bottom
Nourishment
Area
Area
Bottom
Nourishment
Area
Area
Bottom
Rise Nourishment
Length
Above Below
Length
Above
Below
Length
Above
Below
Max Nourishment
(cy) (N)
(mi)
MHW MHW Area
(mi)
MHW
MHW Area
(mi)
MHW
MHW Area
Volume (q)
(acres) (acres) (acres)
(acres)
(acres) (acres)
(acres)
(acres) (ares)
MIN 8,593,338
337,500 8,930,838
67.7
1,009 1,353 2,362
33.8
730
578 1,308
22.6
621
467 1,OB8
MAX 9,746,622
1 337,500 10,084,122
76.4
1,139 1,528 1 2,667
38.2
824
653 1,477
25.5
701
528 1,228
Based on Table 3-5, for projects stemming from background erosion, the minimum nourishment
length and bottom area for any 10 year time period are 9.2 miles and 446 acres (based on 75 cy/ft
fill density) and the maximum nourishment length and bottom area for any 10 year time period
are 36.5 miles and 1,273 acres (based on 25 cy/ft fill density). It is expected that the fill density
6

will likely be in between 25 cy/ft and 75 cy/ft. Therefore, an average project length and bottom
area for any 10 -year period would be in the range of 13.9 — 18.2 miles and 536 - 705 acres (based
on 50 cy/ft fill density).
Based on Table 3-6, for projects stemming from storm erosion, the minimum nourishment length
and bottom area for any 10 year time period are 13.3 miles and 642 acres (based on 75 cy/ft fill
density) and the maximum nourishment length and bottom area for any 10 year time period are
39.9 miles and 1,393 acres (based on 25 cy/ft fill density). It is expected that the fill density will
likely be in between 25 cy/ft and 75 cy/ft. Therefore, an average project length and bottom area
for any 10 -year period would be in the range of 20.0 miles and 772 acres (based on 50 cy/ft fill
density).
Table 3-7 presents the total impact expected from background erosion and storm erosion for any
10 -year period. The minimum nourishment length and bottom area are 22.6 miles and 1,088
acres (based on 75 cy/ft fill density) and the maximum nourishment length and bottom area are
76.4 miles and 2,667 acres (based on 25 cy/ft fill density). It is expected that the fill density will
likely be in between 25 cy/ft and 75 cy/ft. Therefore, an average project length and bottom area
would be in the range of 33.8 — 38.2 miles and 1,308 — 1,477 acres (based on 50 cy/ft fill
density).
3.2.3 50 Year Project Dimension Range
Table 3-8, Table 3-9, and Table 3-10 present the minimum and maximum nourishment lengths
and bottom areas for fill densities of 25 cy/ft, 50 cy/ft, and 75 cy/ft over the entire 50 year time
period for background erosion losses, storm erosion losses, and total losses (background +
storm), respectively. As can be seen, the lowest fill density of 25 cy/ft lends itself to the largest
nourishment length and thus, the largest bottom area covered. Conversely, the highest fill
density of 75 cy/ft lends itself to the smallest nourishment length and thus, the smallest bottom
area covered. It should be noted that during the entire 50 -year period, which may include 16
projects stemming from background erosion and 16 projects stemming from storm events,
certain locations may be nourished more than once. Therefore, the total nourishment length and
bottom area sizes may incorporate the same location more than once, creating a seemingly larger
area of influence than what will be impacted.
Table 3-8: 50 Year Nourishment Volume, Length, and Bottom Area — Background
Erosion Only
50 YEAR NOURISHMENT LENGTH AND BOTTOM AREA RANGES -BACKGROUND EROSION ONLY
Total Nourishment Volume
25 cy/ft Fill Density
50cy/ft Fill Density
75 cy/ft Fill Density
Bottom
Bottom
Total
Bottom
Bottom
Total
Bottom
Bottom
Total
Background
Sea Level
Total
Nourishment
Area
Area
Nourishment
Area
Area
Nourishment
Area
Area
Time
Nourishment
Rise
Nourishment
Length
Above
Below
Bottom
Length
Above
Below
Bottom
Length
Above
Below
Bottom
Volume (cy)
(cy)
(cy)
(mi)
MHW
MHW
Area
(ml)
MHW
MHW
Area
(ml)
MHW
MHW
Area
(acres)
(acres)
(acres)
(acres)
(acres)
(acres)
(acres)
(acres)
(acres)
50yr
21,612,609
900,000
22,512,609
170.6
2,543
3,411
5,954
85.3
1,840
1,457
3,297
56.9
1,564
1,178
2,743
10

Table 3-9: 50 Year Nourishment Volume, Length, and Bottom Area — Storm Erosion
Only
50 YEAR NOURISHMENT LENGTH AND BOTTOM AREA RANGES -STORM EROSION ONLY
Total Nourishment Volume
25cy/ft Fill Density
50 cy/ft Fill Density
75cy/ft Fill Density
Background+
Bottom
Bottom
Total
Bottom
Bottom
Total
Bottom
Bottom
Storm
Storm
Sea Level
Total
Nourishment
Area
Area
Total
Nourishment
Area
Area
Total
Nourishment
Area
Area
Total
Time
Nourishment
Rise
Nourishment
Length
Above
Below
Bottom
Length
Above
Below
Bottom
length
Above
Below
Bottom
(W)
Volume (cy)
(cy)
(cy)
(mi)
MHW
MHW
Area
(mi)
MHW
MHW
Area
(mi)
MHW
MHW
Area
(acres)
(acres)
(acres)
lanes)
(acres)
(acres)
(acres)
(acres)
(awes)
(acres)
(acres) (acres)
(acres)
(acres)
48,812,609
1,80,000
(acres)
(acres)
5,717
50yr
27,200,000
900,000
28,100,000
212.9
3,174
4,258
7,431
106.4
2,297
1,819
4,116
71.0
1,952
1,471
3,423
Table 3-10: 50 Year Nourishment Volume, Length, and Bottom Area — Background &
Storm Erosion
50 YEAR NOURISHMENT LENGTH AND BOTTOM AREA RANGES - TOTAL EROSION (BACKGROUND + STORM)
Total Nourishment Volume
2Scy/ft Fill Density
50cy/ft Fill nsity
75cy/ft Fill Density
Background+
Bottom
Bottom
Total
Bottom
Bottom
Total
Bottom Bottom
Total
Storm
Sea Level
Total
Nourishment
Area
Area
Bottom
Nourishment
Area
Area
Bottom
Nourishment
Area Area
Bottom
Time
Rise
Nourishment
Length
Above
Below
Length
Above
Below
Length
Above Below
Nourishment
(N)
(W)
(ml)
MHW
MHW
Area
(mi)
MHW
MHW
Area
(mi)
MHW MHW
Area
Volume(q)
(acres)
(acres)
(acres)
(acres)
(acres)
(acres)
(acres)
(acres) (acres)
50yr
48,812,609
1,80,000
50,612,609
383.4
5,717
7,669
13,385
191.7
4,136
3,277
7,413
127.8
3,517 2,649
6,166
Based on Table 3-8, for projects stemming from background erosion, the minimum nourishment
length and bottom area for the entire 50 year time period are 56.9 miles and 2,743 acres (based
on 75 cy/ft fill density) and the maximum nourishment length and bottom area for the entire 50
year time period are 170.6 miles and 5,954 acres (based on 25 cy/ft fill density). It is expected
that the fill density will likely be in between 25 cy/ft and 75 cy/ft. Therefore, an average project
length and bottom area for the entire 50 -year period would be in the range of 85.3 miles and
3,297 acres (based on 50 cy/ft fill density).
Based on Table 3-9, for projects stemming from storm erosion, the minimum nourishment length
and bottom area for the entire 50 year time period are 71.0 miles and 3,423 acres (based on 75
cy/ft fill density) and the maximum nourishment length and bottom area for the entire 50 year
time period are 212.9 miles and 7,431 acres (based on 25 cy/ft fill density). It is expected that
the fill density will likely be in between 25 cy/ft and 75 cy/ft. Therefore, an average project
length and bottom area for the entire 50 -year period would be in the range of 106.4 miles and
4,116 acres (based on 50 cy/ft fill density).
Table 3-10 presents the total impact expected from background erosion and storm erosion for the
entire 50 -year period. The minimum nourishment length and bottom area are 127.8 miles and
6,166 acres (based on 75 cy/ft fill density) and the maximum nourishment length and bottom
area are 383.4 miles and 13,385 acres (based on 25 cy/ft fill density). It is expected that the fill
density will likely be in between 25 cy/ft and 75 cy/ft. Therefore, an average project length and
bottom area would be in the range of 191.7 miles and 7,413 acres (based on 50 cy/ft fill density).
3.3 Bogue Banks Master Beach Nourishment Plan — Project #1
The initial project under the Master Beach Nourishment Plan is set to take place during winter
2018/2019. Current plans call for 1,519,030 cy of material to be placed along 9.5 miles of
shoreline in Emerald Isle, Indian Beach, Salter Path, and Pine Knoll Shores. This is an average
fill density of 30 cy/ft. Figure 3-2 shows the planned placement locations and volumes. Material
for the project will be dredged from portions of the Current and Old ODMDS as presented in

Figure 3-2. Permit drawings for the Bogue Banks Master Beach Nourishment Plan — Project #1
are presented in Appendix B.
CARTERET COUNTY
4-
0 05 1 2 3
mMillis
Figure 3-2: Bogue Banks Master Beach Nourishment Plan — Project #1 (Winter
2018/2019)
It should be noted that this initial project is essentially the "Year 6" nourishment, as presented in
the Master Beach Nourishment Plan (see Figure 3-1), rather than "Year 3". As time has
progressed during the formulation and permitting of the Master Beach Nourishment Plan, a need
has developed to start the project with "Year 6".
4.0 METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION
The proposed fill will be reclaimed by a variety of methods depending on the borrow source
location with respect to the oceanfront shoreline: 1) ocean-going, trailing suction hopper
dredge(s) placing from offshore pump -out stations along the recipient beach, 2) pipeline dredges
placing material from adjacent inlet or AIWW sites along the recipient beach, or 3) truck haul
from upland sand mines. Only the profile above high water is controllable in beach nourishment
construction; intertidal and underwater portions of the profile will be subject to natural
adjustment by waves. The fill will be placed no higher than +6 ft NAVD (the natural elevation of
the berm).
Work will progress in sections within the borrow area and along the beach. Fill placement along
the beach will typically progress at a rate of 400-700 linear feet per day for dredged material.
Construction activities will involve movement of heavy equipment and pipe along ---1 mile
12
BEAUFORi .
INLET
..
S
Reach3
Raach4
Shores Oitl
yyji �����y$y�jilts
s ��
• . ^ `
/
Indian Beach!
Salter Path
Pine KnoI1
59-76
7r ens
ODMOS
- -=-=
`ae
= s 1
�1ji Reach
Reach.`
Beam
ipdian 54
49.
Sransec is 55.58
18 rni1as
Scta
rn�tes
9 cy
71148 ._ ._ -
_.
'ritl� y!Y� Emerald Is 10
35't
Transects
1 9 mi les
1 68,716 cY
BOGUEr Transacts
3.0
LFB 281 cY
Potential
INLET 5q4 cy
412,
-
Borrow
Areas
ONSLOW BAY
Wa�r$B�"L�aN
4-
0 05 1 2 3
mMillis
Figure 3-2: Bogue Banks Master Beach Nourishment Plan — Project #1 (Winter
2018/2019)
It should be noted that this initial project is essentially the "Year 6" nourishment, as presented in
the Master Beach Nourishment Plan (see Figure 3-1), rather than "Year 3". As time has
progressed during the formulation and permitting of the Master Beach Nourishment Plan, a need
has developed to start the project with "Year 6".
4.0 METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION
The proposed fill will be reclaimed by a variety of methods depending on the borrow source
location with respect to the oceanfront shoreline: 1) ocean-going, trailing suction hopper
dredge(s) placing from offshore pump -out stations along the recipient beach, 2) pipeline dredges
placing material from adjacent inlet or AIWW sites along the recipient beach, or 3) truck haul
from upland sand mines. Only the profile above high water is controllable in beach nourishment
construction; intertidal and underwater portions of the profile will be subject to natural
adjustment by waves. The fill will be placed no higher than +6 ft NAVD (the natural elevation of
the berm).
Work will progress in sections within the borrow area and along the beach. Fill placement along
the beach will typically progress at a rate of 400-700 linear feet per day for dredged material.
Construction activities will involve movement of heavy equipment and pipe along ---1 mile
12

reaches over a period of 1-2 weeks. Once a section is complete, piping and heavy equipment will
be shifted to a new section and the process repeated. As soon as practicable, sections will be
graded and dressed to final slopes. Other than at temporary equipment staging areas, residents
and visitors along the project area will not experience significant disruption to recreational
activities except within the immediate construction area. Existing public access to the beach will
remain open during construction. Offshore pump -out stations and appurtenances would not
affect commercial or recreational boating.
Land-based equipment will be brought to the site over public roads and will enter the beach at
existing permanent beach accesses identified on the permit drawings. Existing dunes and
vegetation on the beach will be avoided and preserved; however, any alteration of dune
vegetation/topography necessary for equipment access will be repaired to pre -project conditions.
Daily equipment staging will be on the constructed beach seaward of the dune line. Construction
contracts will provide for proper storage and disposal of oils, chemicals, and hydraulic fluids
(etc.) necessary for operation in accordance with state and federal regulations.
4.1 Equipment- Trailing Suction Hopper Dredge
Hopper dredges will dredge material from the designated ocean borrow area. Hopper dredges
typically require —25 ft minimum operational depth and are efficient for excavating shallow cuts
on the order of —2-5 ft. During excavation and loading, the sand/water slurry drains overboard
via scuppers, leaving coarser material in the hopper. When loaded, the dredge travels to a
temporary mooring and submerged pipeline near the project site. The hopper dredge connects to
the pipeline and pumps the material from the hopper to the beach where the sand is spread
mechanically by bulldozers. This is the same type of dredging placement operation used during
Phase 1 and most of Phase 2 of the Bogue Banks beach nourishment projects completed in
winter of 2001-2002 and 2002-2003 (respectively) as well as the Post-Ophelia and Post -Irene
projects.
4.2 Equipment — Pipeline Dredge
Pipeline dredges will dredge material from a designated nearby borrow area, likely Bogue Inlet
or adjacent waterway. A pipeline dredge sucks dredged material through one end, the intake
pipe, and then pushes it out the discharge pipeline directly into the disposal site. The discharge
line for pipeline dredges is usually floated on top of the water until it reaches land where it is
then run to the disposal site. Material pumped from the pipeline dredge onto the beach is spread
mechanically by bulldozers.
4.3 Equipment — Truck Haul
If upland sand mines are used as a borrow source, dump trucks are used to transport material
from the sand mine to the recipient beach where it is dumped and then mechanically spread by
bulldozers.
4.4 Construction Schedule
Construction will take place within the environmental window stated in the FEIS (November 16
through April 30).
13

4.5 Bogue Banks Master Beach Nourishment Plan — Project #1
The initial project to be performed in Winter 2018/2019 (see Section 3.3) will use a hopper
dredge to obtain material from the Current and Old ODMDS where it will then be transported to
an offshore temporary mooring and submerged pipeline near the project site. The hopper dredge
will then connect to the pipeline and pump the material from the hopper to the beach where the
sand is spread mechanically by bulldozers. As mentioned previously, this is the same type of
dredging placement operation used during Phase 1 and most of Phase 2 of the Bogue Banks
beach nourishment projects completed in winter of 2001-2002 and 2002-2003 (respectively) as
well as the Post-Ophelia and Post -Irene projects.
5.0 SEDIMENT COMPATIBILITY
The following sections summarize the data collection and analysis performed as part of the
Master Beach Nourishment Plan. The full sediment analysis report is provided in Appendix C
(Sediment Analysis).
5.1 Native Beach Sediment Data
Before the series of nourishment projects which took place along Bogue Banks in the 2000's,
native beach data was collected by the USACE as well as CSE. These data indicate a native
grain size ranging from 0.2 mm to 0.3 mm. For this report, a median grain size of 0.3 mm is
selected as the best representation of the native beach based upon the 64 samples analyzed by
CSE in 2001. Table 5-1 summarizes the available native beach data. More detail on these
studies can been seen in Appendix C.
Table 5-1: Available Native Beach Data
Date
Source
Mean Grain Size (nun)
Coverage
1976
USACE
0.17
Atlantic Beach (4 transects)
1999
CSE
0.3
Bogue Banks (6 transects; 20,000 R apart)
2001
USACE
0.19
Bogue Inlet Area
2001
USACE
0.19
West Emerald Isle
2001
USACE
0.2
East Emerald Isle
2001
USACE
0.2
Indian Beach
2001
USACE
0.19
Pine Knoll Shores
2001
USACE
0.19
Atlantic Beach
2001
USACE
0.22
Fort Macon
2001
CSE
0.3
Indian BeacIVSaker Path & Pine Knoll Shores (16 transects)
The material in the proposed borrow areas must meet the characteristics prescribed by North
Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC) "Technical Standards for Beach Fill Projects" (15A
NCAC 07H .0312) resulting in the parameters listed in Table 5-2.
14

Table 5-2: Native Beach Characteristics and Rule Parameters
Characteristic
2001 Native
NCAC Required Borrow
Requirements Site Parameters
Fines (<#230)
Reported: 0%, Assumed: <I%
<1% +5% < 6%
Sand (>#230 & <#10)
Reported at 98.68%
- -
Granular (># 10 & <#4)
Reported combined at 1.32%,
Assumed 0.7% each
0.7%+5% < 6%
Gravel (>#4)
0.7%+5% < 6%
Calcium Carbonate
Reported at 15-20%
20%+15% < 35%
In addition, Moffatt & Nichol conducted a field investigation on May 24, 2018 to estimate the
total number of sediments and shell material greater than or equal to three inches in diameter,
observable on the surface of the beach between mean low water and the frontal dune toe, in a
50,000 square foot area. Investigations were performed two locations, one in Atlantic Beach
between Transects 78 and 80 and one in Emerald Isle between Transects 29 and 30. The Atlantic
Beach investigation area has never been nourished and the Emerald Isle investigation area has
only been nourished once. Results of the investigation found 138 pieces of shell material greater
than or equal to three inches in diameter at Atlantic Beach and 211 pieces of shell material
greater than or equal to three inches in diameter at Emerald Isle. Appendix C contains the details
and documentation of the field investigation.
5.2 Potential Sources for the Bogue Banks Master Beach Nourishment Plan
In 2012, Alpine and Coastal Tech conducted a geotechnical investigation of the main potential
offshore borrow areas near Bogue Banks to identify beach -compatible sand resources for the
long-term beach nourishment needs of Carteret County. The sites investigated were the Old
Ocean Dredge Material Disposal Site (ODMDS) located directly offshore of Beaufort Inlet, the
Current ODMDS just south of the Old ODMDS, Area Y and Z directly offshore of Emerald Isle,
and the main ebb channel of Bogue Inlet, as shown in Figure 5-1. The 2012 investigation
consisted of 164 twenty -foot vibracores extracted in the Old ODMDS, Current ODMDS, Area Y,
and Area Z. There were an additional 5 ten -foot vibracores extracted in Bogue Inlet by Alpine
Ocean Seismic Survey. Analysis of vibracores collected in 2002 by the USACE in the Morehead
City Outer Harbor was also conducted to ensure compatibility and verify the quantity of any
material available for placement as a result of the USACE Morehead City Harbor Dredged
Material Management Plan (DMMP). The results of the sand search investigation are
summarized for each site in the following sections while a detailed report can be found in
Appendix C. In addition, research was conducted to estimate potential sediment quantities in
upland sediment sources (sand mines) and AIWW disposal areas.
15

Area �
� Area Z
9 I b YiT..
_7 ,t .
i; .... Ud
Current ODMDS
Legend
Vibracores Potential Borrow Areas
Area 7unentODMDS
• Area Z - USACE Area Y - -
• ODMDS - Old ODMDS - .0
• Bogw Inlet — •� Miles
Figure 5-1: Potential Borrow Areas and 2012 Vibracore Locations (Coastal Tech, 2013)
5.3 Old ODMDS
This site is located directly north of the Current ODMDS in State waters. The Old ODMDS was
split into two sections; designated Old ODMDS 1 and Old ODMDS 2, to maximize the potential
borrow area volume as shown in Figure 5-2.
1
16

n1
Old ODMDS 1
IIDS 21R pgµ
QR
46
8
M
+u
�+ 4S 50
�p ;a, Legend
Sand Quality 0 OldODMDs2
• Good Navigation Channel
046 Moderate Geodynamics 2009+2011 bathy
• Poor Value
Q Current ODMDS High: -31
Old u -N.- 0 ry 2.400
G :.r
OIdODMDS 1 Low: -56.5 eet
Figure 5-2: Old ODMDS Site and Vibracore Locations (Coastal Tech, 2013)
5.3.1 Old ODMDS I
Old ODMDS 1 borrow area is location on the boarder of Current ODMDS. This area consists of
fine grained, poorly sorted quartz sand with a mean grain size of 0.30 millimeters (mm) and an
overfill factor of 1.30. This area is estimated to contain 13.1 Million cubic yards (Mcy) of beach
compatible sand. The characteristics of this material are compliant with the parameters defined
by the NCAC as shown in Table 5-3.
Table 5-3: Old ODMDS 1 Characteristics and NCAC Parameters (Coastal Tech, 2013)
Characteristic
Required Borrow
Site Parameters
01 15
Fines (<#230)
IIDS 21R pgµ
QR
46
8
M
+u
�+ 4S 50
�p ;a, Legend
Sand Quality 0 OldODMDs2
• Good Navigation Channel
046 Moderate Geodynamics 2009+2011 bathy
• Poor Value
Q Current ODMDS High: -31
Old u -N.- 0 ry 2.400
G :.r
OIdODMDS 1 Low: -56.5 eet
Figure 5-2: Old ODMDS Site and Vibracore Locations (Coastal Tech, 2013)
5.3.1 Old ODMDS I
Old ODMDS 1 borrow area is location on the boarder of Current ODMDS. This area consists of
fine grained, poorly sorted quartz sand with a mean grain size of 0.30 millimeters (mm) and an
overfill factor of 1.30. This area is estimated to contain 13.1 Million cubic yards (Mcy) of beach
compatible sand. The characteristics of this material are compliant with the parameters defined
by the NCAC as shown in Table 5-3.
Table 5-3: Old ODMDS 1 Characteristics and NCAC Parameters (Coastal Tech, 2013)
Characteristic
Required Borrow
Site Parameters
Old ODMDS 1
Fines (<#230)
< 6%
0.53%
Sand (>#230 & <#10)
-
96.00%
Granular (>#I 0 & <#4)
< 6%
2.14%
Gravel (>#4)
< 6%
1.33%
Calcium Carbonate
< 35%
13.55%
17

5.3.2 Old ODMDS 2
Old ODMDS 2 borrow area is similar to Old ODMDS 1 with a slightly larger mean grain size of
0.32 mm and an overfill factor of 1.25. This area is estimated to contain 1.1 Mcy of beach
compatible sand that meet the NCAC criteria as listed in Table 5-4.
Table 5-4: Old ODMDS 2 Characteristics and NCAC Parameters (Coastal Tech, 2013)
Characteristic
Required Borrow
Site Parameters
Old ODMDS 2
Fines (<#230)
< 6%
0.20%
Sand (>#230 & <#10)
-
96.30%
Granular (>#I 0 & <#4)
< 6%
2.49%
Gravel (>#4)
< 6%
1.01%
Calcium Carbonate
< 35%
13.57%
5.4 Current ODMDS
The Current ODMDS is located south of the Old ODMDS just outside of the 3 -mile
jurisdictional line in Federal waters. This area was divided into eight potential borrow areas
consisting of one large mound and seven smaller disposal mounds. The seven small disposal
mounds were then grouped according to the level of confidence in the granularmetric data.
5.4.1 Current ODMDS I
Current ODMDS 1 is an extension of the large mound located in Old ODMDS 1 as shown below
in Figure 5-3; therefore, they have very similar sediment properties. The mean grain size is 0.30
mm and has an overfill factor of 1.25 and meets all the NCAC compatibility requirements as
listed in Table 5-5. This site contains approximately 3.27 Mcy of beach compatible material.
This number has been adjusted from that presented in Appendix C (4.23 Mcy) by subtracting out
the Hurricane Irene renourishment amount which was dredged from this borrow area.
18

Figure 5-3: Current ODMDS 1 Site and Vibracore Locations (Coastal Tech, 2013)
Table 5-5: Current ODMDS 1 Characteristics and NCAC Parameters (Coastal Tech,
2013)
Characteristic
Required Borrow
Site Parameters
Current
ODMDS 1
Fines (<#230)
< 6%
0.52%
Sand (>#230 & <#10)
-
96.06%
Granular (>#I 0 & <#4)
< 6%
2.06%
Gravel (>#4)
< 6%
1.36%
Calcium Carbonate
< 35%
13.29%
5.4.2 Higher Confidence Mounds
The higher confidence mounds include mounds where at least one vibracore penetrates the
thickest portion of the mound. This allows for more accurate representation of the stratigraphy
to be defined. The higher confidence mounds include Mounds 0-15, 0-192, 0-48, 014, and 0-
47, as shown in Figure 5-4.
19

50
•
1
4S
OA9 0 051 052
jV
52 053 O 055 056 7 058 059 060 `
.r n '14
62
Legend f �f
52
.52 2012 Vibracores O Higher Confidence Mounds
�" Sand Quality Geodynamics 2011 bathymetry
a
Good NAVD88 Ft
�4 � \\ Moderate High: -31.0
• Poor
Current ODMDS Low: -56.5 N 2,000
- Old ODMDS reet
Figure 5-4: Higher Confidence Mound Sites and Vibracore Locations (Coastal Tech,
2013)
Mound 0-15
Mound 0-15 is located west of Current ODMDS 1 and has vibracore 0-15 passing directly
through the thickest section of the mound. This potential borrow area consists of fine grained,
moderately sorted quartz sand and has a mean grain size of 0.24 mm, which is smaller than the
native mean grain size. This results in a larger overfill factor of 1.60 and Mound 0-15 being
assigned a "B" ranking. All parameters defined by NCAC were met, as shown in Table 5-6;
therefore, the material is considered beach compatible. The total amount of beach compatible
material in this mound is approximately 356,000 cubic yards (cy).
Table 5-6: Mound 0-15 Characteristics and NCAC Parameters (Coastal Tech, 2013)
Characteristic
Required Borrow
Site Parameters
Mound 0-15
Fines (<#230)
< 6%
0.07%
Sand (>#230 & <#10)
-
99.23%
Granular (>#I 0 & <#4)
<6%
0.54%
Gravel (>#4)
< 6%
0.16%
Calcium Carbonate
< 35%
10.10%
20

Mound 0-192
Mound 0-192 is located southwest of Current ODMDS 1 and has vibracore 0-192 and 0-41
passing through this mound; with 0-192 passing through the thickest section of the mound. This
potential borrow area consists of fine grained, poorly sorted quartz sand and has a mean grain
size of 0.36 mm, which is coarser than the previous mound. This results in a smaller overfill
factor of 1.25 and Mound 0-192 assigned an "A" ranking. All parameters defined by NCAC are
met, as shown in Table 5-7; therefore, the material is considered beach compatible. The total
amount of beach compatible material in this mound is approximately 785,270 cy.
Table 5-7: Mound 0-192 Characteristics and NCAC Parameters (Coastal Tech, 2013)
Characteristic
Required Borrow
Site Parameters
Mound 0-192
Fines (<#230)
< 6%
0.13%
Sand (>#230 & <#10)
-
93.07%
Granular (>#10 & <#4)
5 6%
3.43%
Gravel (>#4)
< 6%
3.37%
Calcium Carbonate
5 35%
19.59%
Mound 0-48
Mound 0-48 is located southwest of Current ODMDS 1 and has vibracore 0-48 passing through
the middle of the mound. This potential borrow area consists of fine grained, moderately sorted
quartz sand and has a mean grain size of 0.2 mm, which is significantly finer than the native
sediment. This results in a larger overfill factor of 2.25 and Mound 0-48 assigned a "C"
ranking. All parameters defined by NCAC were met, as shown in Table 5-8; therefore, the
material is considered beach compatible. The total amount of beach compatible material in this
mound is approximately 468,740 cy.
Table 5-8: Mound 0-48 Characteristics and NCAC Parameters (Coastal Tech, 2013)
Characteristic
Required Borrow
Site Parameters
Mound 0-48
Fines (<#230)
< 6%
5.91%
Sand (>#230 & <#10)
-
92.83%
Granular (>#10 & <#4)
< 6%
1.11%
Gravel (>#4)
5 6%
0.15%
Calcium Carbonate
< 35%
7.76%
Mound 0-14/0-47
Mound 0-14/0-47 is located west of Mound 0-48 and has vibracore 0-14, 0-47, and 0-38
passing through the mound. This mound was split because it was assigned two different cut
depths to maximize beach quality material being removed. Even though this area was split, the
sediment properties were analyzed and recorded as one site. This potential borrow area consists
of fine grained, poorly sorted quartz sand and has a mean grain size of 0.38 mm, which is coarser
21

than the native sediment. This results in a smaller overfill factor of 1.20 and Mound 0-14/0-47
assigned an "A" ranking. All parameters defined by NCAC were met, as shown in Table 5-9;
therefore, the material is considered beach compatible. The total amount of beach compatible
material in this mound is approximately 566,028 cy.
Table 5-9: Mound 0-14/0-47 Characteristics and NCAC Parameters (Coastal Tech,
2013)
Characteristic
Required Borrow
Site Parameters
Mound
0-14/0-47
Fines (<4230)
< 6%
0.23%
Sand (>#230 & <#I 0)
-
93.43%
Granular (>#l0 & <#4)
< 6%
4.71%
Gravel (>#4)
< 6%
1.63%
Calcium Carbonate
< 35%
19.80%
5.4.3 Lower Confidence Mounds
The lower confidence mounds include mounds where the vibracore is located along the edge and
none that penetrate the thickest portion of the mound. This prevents an accurate representation
of the stratigraphy to be defined. The lower confidence mounds include Mounds 0-35 and 0-46,
which are shown in Figure 5-5. Coastal Tech recommends that these mounds be sampled with
additional vibracores in the thickest portion of the mounds to confirm the sediment characteristic
inferred from the existing cores.
22

ar
52
tl
040 966 8^1 022
•
r ;IA 14S 5
1 �`~
049 051 052
Q
055 056 57 058 059 060
• • • • • • •
52
Required Borrow
Site Parameters
Legend
Fines (<#230)
2012 Vibracores
O Lower Confidence Mounds
C
Sand Quality
Geodynamics 2011 bathymetry
��'
• Good
NAVD88 Ft
Gravel (>#4)
C� Moderate
High :-31.0
�Q�
• Poor
Q Current ODMDS Low: -56.5 0 N 2,000
15.20%
Old ODMDS
f-e@t
Figure 5-5: Lower Confidence Mound Sites and Vibracores (Coastal Tech, 2013)
Mound 0-35
Mound 0-35 is located south of Current ODMDS 1 and shares data from vibracore 0-35 which
was used in the analysis of Current ODMDS 1. Vibracore 0-43 passes through the southern
edge of this mound. These vibracores were weighted equally when the mound composite was
created. This potential borrow area consists of fine grained, poorly sorted quartz sand. An
overfill factor of 1.3 was calculated and Mound 0-35 was assigned a "B" ranking due to the lack
of sampling in the middle of the area. All parameters defined by NCAC were met, as shown in
Table 5-10 below; therefore, the material is considered beach compatible. The total amount of
beach compatible material in this mound is approximately 499,500 cy.
Table 5-10: Mound 0-35 Characteristics and NCAC Parameters (Coastal Tech, 2013)
Characteristic
Required Borrow
Site Parameters
Mound 0-35
Fines (<#230)
< 6%
0.31%
Sand (>#230 & <#10)
-
96.08%
Granular (># 10 & <#4)
< 6%
2.65%
Gravel (>#4)
< 6%
0.96%
Calcium Carbonate
< 35%
15.20%
23

Mnnnd 0-d6
Mound 0-46 is located southwest of Current ODMDS 1 and only has vibracore 0-46 passing
through the edge of the mound. This potential borrow area consists of fine grained, poorly sorted
quartz sand and has a mean grain size of 0.4 mm, which is coarser than the native sediment. An
overfill factor of 1.25 was calculated and Mound 0-46 was assigned a "B" ranking due to the
lack of sampling in the middle of the area. All parameters defined by NCAC were met except
for Granular, as shown in Table 5-11. It is believed that, upon further sampling in the center of
the area, the percent granular may fall within the guidelines defined. The total amount of
potential beach compatible material in this mound is approximately 493,564 cy.
Table 5-11: Mound 0-46 Characteristics and NCAC Parameters (Coastal Tech, 2013)
Characteristic
Required Borrow
Site Parameters
Mound 0-35
Fines (<4230)
<6%
0.37%
Sand (>#230 & <#10)
-
90.60%
Granular (>#I 0 & <#4)
< 6%
6.27%
Gravel (>#4)
< 6%
2.76%
Calcium Carbonate
< 35%
18.17%
5.4.4 Contingency Mounds
The remaining mounds in the Current ODMDS lack a vibracore within the boundary of the
mound, as shown in Figure 5-6. Conceptual cut depths were assumed from the surrounding
vibracores and potential volumes were calculated. These mounds do not have sediment
characteristics defined. The potential volumes these mounds contain are shown in Table 5-12
with a total volume of approximately 320,000 cy.
24

Figure 5-6: Contingency Mound Sites and Vibracores
Table 5-12: Contingency Mound Volumes (Coastal Tech, 2013)
Mound
Cut Elevation NAVD88
Volume (cy)
0-16
-50 ft
95,326
0-39
-52 ft
94.352
0-37/0-38
-51 ft
71.233
0-32
-50 ft
58,543
Total
319,454
5.5 Area Y
Area Y is located seaward of Emerald Isle within State waters in which 55 vibracores were
collected. Vibracores were initially taken on a 1,000 -foot by 1,000 -foot grid; however, a
significant amount of fines were found in the surficial layer. The spacing was then increased to a
2,000 -foot grid spacing, and two areas were identified as potential sites as shown in Figure 5-7.
25

if.
P1VR CPB
i
harsh
idley
int\
41
y4 22,13
hart 11541) Q,41 ♦gWPMSBQ—Y7 1
, r
Y74Y7
� V / Y Y136 •
' S Y6 • Y141
i Y•
GfOlrls....
h �J,
34
Y72 Y• 5 •3
•Y79
>
�i
7
• Y98 • •
\
/26
235
-ZZI5 Z234Z•
Y71 • YO 1 Y103 •8
Y77 • V84 ,
,] ^�p�
tv%�" 2214 •. �� •33 • Z772
Z171 Z•1 •
• Y107 •
�1 Y76 • Y83
(/ Z2't •
-. f��1,��1(�� •W•\ Z170Z1 • Z259
�/S Z� ��
• Y110 •
Y82 • Y115
• • M
I(}/Ll (�� 2257
2188Z�
Y.q
Y81
Z 1 •4141
34 z i� •
�� Z�,
zlecie Z276 Z301
Z17�•., / • 229923.00
,
45 vas
�•`\\
": • y11940
`
Legend
44
`
Obsin
• 2012 Vibracores Geodynamics 2011 Bathy
Fish Ha
Y120 Mound NAVD88 Ft47
\
Muth M
O Y80 Mound High :-31.0 \
i
0 4,000 N
Low: -58.6
eet
Figure 5-7: Area Y Site and Vibracores (Coastal Tech, 2013)
5.5.1 Vibracores Y -80/Y--75
Vibracores Y-80 and Y-75 are 2000 feet apart and, due to the hardbottom buffer to the east, no
vibracores were taken on that side. The vibracores taken to the west of Y-80 and Y-75 are not
beach compatible. This potential borrow area consists of fine grained, moderately well sorted
quartz sand and has a mean grain size of 0.23 mm, which is finer than the native sediment. All
parameters defined by NCAC were met as shown below in Table 5-13. Although the parameters
are met, the area should be considered a low priority with a "C" ranking due to insufficient
vibracores to designate a reliable borrow area and poor quality of sediment. The potential
volume is estimated at 1.08 Mcy; however, the rectangular area defined is purely conceptual and
not based on the vibracores.
O.

Table 5-13: Vibracores Y-80 & Y-75 Characteristics and NCAC Parameters (Coastal
Tech, 2013)
Characteristic
Required Borrow
Site Parameters
Vibracores
Y-80 / Y-75
Fines (<#230)
< 6%
2.37%
Sand (>#230 & <#10)
-
97.55%
Granular (>#10 & <#4)
< 6%
0.08%
Gravel (>#4)
< 6%
0.00%
Calcium Carbonate
< 35%
1.85%
5.5.2 Vibracores Y -1201Y--90
Vibracores Y-120 and Y-90 are 1000 feet apart and are located along a ridge; however, the
sediment color is dark in color. This potential borrow area also exceeds the requirement set by
NCAC for Gravel as shown in Table 5-14; therefore, would not be considered beach compatible.
The total amount of material in this mound is approximately 379,675 cy.
Table 5-14: Vibracores Y-120 & Y-90 Characteristics and NCAC Parameters (Coastal
Tech, 2013)
Characteristic
Required Borrow
Site Parameters
Vibracores
Y-120 / Y-90
Fines (<#230)
< 6%
2.04%
Sand (>#230 & <# 10)
-
86.60%
Granular (>#10 & <#4)
< 6%
3.43%
Gravel (>#4)
< 6%
7.93%
Calcium Carbonate
< 35%
1.50%
5.6 Area Z
Area Z consisted of forty-three vibracores that were taken southeast of Bogue Inlet in efforts to
locate the White Oak River channel, shown in Figure 5-8. Vibracore Z-174 was the only sample
showed a possibility of having beach compatible material; however, it exceeded the Gravel
requirement as shown in Table 5-15.
27

Groins 5 2� res
NSI 4, ,� h:
1 DE O'ARG note A) r % T2s ,
).525c,4?e S t �� ,/ X
.. /2 ,.k Z235
a Z�15 2234 •
2214 Z112
• Z233 •
q 5 2 �� • 23 • z171 Z., •
Z,eo •
7 •ar : • z,7o • Z259
Z, • Z25820 "
�`---� Zi 2
2168 • Z2 55 041
2 J 28 \ 34 Z1 Z6 • ze1 • Z278 0
2176 • 2277 • ' \\
/ ��Z166 • ! Z08 • 2300 Z.1E113 /
\\ \\` 40 9� 2298 Z•9
� L�-02-19�22/f
Z1 Z114\Ls-0Z-, 97 � ® tiF4
Z1 • 'r f .
t
45 46Y 'All
45�
C Fl Y45
46 47 - � ,�L -
LB -0Q -
/f
Legend ,j 48 _` 48 Ls
• 2012 Vibracores 0 N 4.000•^�.-
w�
USAGE 2002 W)racores eet 45
Figure 5-8: Area Z Site and Vibracores (Coastal Tech, 2013)
:WI
Table 5-15: Vibracore Z-174 Characteristics and NCAC Parameters (Coastal Tech,
2013)
Characteristic
Required Borrow
Site Parameters
Vibracore Z-174
Fines (<#230)
< 6%
1.34%
Sand (>#230 & <#10)
-
84.57%
Granular (># 10 & <#4)
< 6%
2.28%
Gravel (>#4)
<6%
11.81%
Calcium Carbonate
< 35%
11.10%
5.7 Bogue Inlet Channel
Five vibracores were collected within the authorized dimensions of the 2005 Bogue Inlet
relocation project as shown in Figure 5-9. The Bogue Inlet ebb and flood shoals are fed by the
surrounding beaches based on sediment transport analysis. The mean grain size of material from
vibracores is 0.33 mm with an overfill factor of 1.15. The sediment met all NCAC compatibility
requirements as listed in Table 5-16. This site contains approximately 850,000 cy to 1 Mcy of
beach compatible material.
28

Figure 5-9: Bogue Inlet Channel Site, Vibracores, and Authorized Channel Location
(Coastal Tech, 2013)
Table 5-16: Bogue Inlet Channel Characteristics and NCAC Parameters (Coastal Tech,
2013)
Characteristic
Required Borrow
Site Parameters
Vibracore Z-174
Fines (<#230)
< 6%
0.15%
Sand (>#230 & <#10)
-
96.61%
Granular (># 10 & <#4)
<_ 6%
2.40%
Gravel (>#4)
< 6%
0.84%
Calcium Carbonate
< 35% 1
14.96%
5.8 Morehead City Outer Harbor
The Outer Harbor consists of the Cutoff and Range A out to Station 110+00 as shown in Figure
5-10. Since this is a federal navigation project, the requirements for beach compatibility only
limit the silt content to less than 10%. The characteristics of the sediment in this area meet that
requirement and are listed below in Table 5-17. The USACE Morehead City Harbor draft
29

Dredged Material Management Plan (DMMP) estimates that the Outer Harbor is shoaling at a
rate of 1.2 Mcy per year (2012). Depending on the final DMMP, there could be between
228,000-635,000 cy of sand available for beach placement annually. A mid-range amount of
400,000 cy/yr is assumed to be available from this source.
ISLANID
►� 1
F 56ft (Da
{ F G (Night
• • i �� t FI 2.5s 31VI
ch,% 11547
•\ • : ` Q G (Night)
1 l
v'�ra ± •
Fl 2.5s •
0 -F1-P. 2.5s
ti 4
17G"161� Y
13 • Q R Y
F1 G 4s N 1' Ra Re S¢ 4M
GONG ^1
r
15 13 8, R'74"
34 10 '23 `�, G 'I t' FI R 43 10
20 Fi G 2.5s 13 11
• t5 W Ct 5 R 12.
31; t8 %�� 14, FJ R 2.5s
`•� Priv S 28—�+ —I 7i/
\ 'M /�' ` • 34 • 22 18 '1 ' 2 19 1 21
l7 4'--.:' • (M J
C ' 22 6
48 4, • • 35 V at
Fr G gs
• • (J� LL1 34
• . >
` • 44
`�. 50
37
3Y \
40
40
33 I
M
BFjA0F0
Legend
46G,ti7'
38
R V
Thep 0 t de
� {,
r0htrqiiin6j%Pth
• USACE 2002 Vibracores
43
Q R
Navigation Channel
46
41
Section
41
Cutoff N
/
{I
Range A
1
G
���
Sp
Range B 0 2,500
F) `
f� 46I
Range C
I
,
Figure 5-10: Morehead City Channel Vibracore and Reach Locations (Coastal Tech,
2013)
OF,

Table 5-17: Morehead City Outer Harbor Characteristics and NCAC Parameters
(Coastal Tech, 2013)
Characteristic
Required Borrow
Site Parameters
Morehead City
Outer Harbor
Fines (<#230)
< 6%
<1%
Sand (>#230 & <#10)
-
Not Reported
Granular (>#I 0 & <#4)
< 6%
Not Reported
Gravel (>#4)
< 6%
6.40%
Calcium Carbonate
< 35%
15.70%
5.9 Upland Sources and AIWW Disposal Areas
The Division of Energy, Mineral and Land Resources of the North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR) has a database of permitted active and inactive
upland mines. From this database, a list of active sand and gravel mines within 30 miles of
Bogue Banks (estimated to be feasible from a trucking cost perspective), which included mines
in the surrounding counties of Craven, Jones, and Onslow, was generated. Based on a
description of the material from various mine owners, a list of potential upland sources was
compiled containing approximately 1,380,700 cy of material. However, if the need arises,
further testing would have to be completed to verify the compatibility based on the current state
rules for beach compatibility.
The USACE performs maintenance dredging for navigation along the AIWW and disposes the
sand in specific disposal areas. A visual inspection of aerial photography for each disposal area
was performed and areas that were in proximity to a previous vibracore location were examined
first. If the sand described by the vibracore and associated geotechnical report met the beach
compatibility standards, it was determined to be a viable site. It is important to note that most of
these areas have not had a sediment analysis performed; therefore, it cannot be confirmed that
the sand meets the compatibility criteria. A sand thickness was assumed for each area of 5 feet
and volumes were then calculated based on this assumption and the area of the disposal island
found from ArcGIS. If 90% of the available sand is placed, the total volume available from the
dredge disposal areas is approximately 1,288,800 cy.
Given the limited amount of sand in the upland sources and AIWW disposal areas compared to
the total 50 -yr need, these sources should be considered for the overall project but solely for
possible use for small "hotspot" projects in the future, as needed, because they do not meet the
50 -yr need.
5.10 Summary of Sediment Data — Total Available Volume
The total volume available when the upland sources, AIWW disposal areas, and the offshore
sources (Old ODMDS, Current ODMDS, and Area Y) are combined is presented in Table 5-18.
The total non-renewable volume available from these sources is 25,123,057 cy. The overall
sediment need for Bogue Banks over the 50 year planning horizon based on the
analytical/empirical analysis is between 45.0 and 49.8 Mcy (46.8 to 51.6 Mcy for moderate sea
level change). Therefore, the volume of the combined upland, AIWW, and offshore sources will
not be enough to meet the 50 year need by itself.
31

Table 5-18: Summary of Non -Renewable Potential Borrow Areas
Area
Total Volume c
Upland Sand Mines
1,380,700
AIWW Disposal Areas
1,288,800
Offshore Sources
22,453,557
TOTAL
25,123,057
In addition to the upland, AIWW, and offshore borrow sources, Bogue and Beaufort Inlets could
also provide material on a cyclical basis as they regularly shoal and must be dredged by the
USACE for navigation purposes. These renewable borrow areas could potentially provide
approximately 25,130,000 cy over 50 years, as shown in Table 5-19, which, by itself, is not
enough to cover the 50 year need of between 45.0 and 49.8 Mcy (46.8 to 51.6 Mcy for moderate
sea level change).
Table 5-19: Volume of Renewable Potential Borrow Areas (Coastal Tech, 2013)
Area
Section
Volume
Dredging
50 yr
25,123,057
TOTAL
50,253,057
Frequency
Total
MHC Outer
Cutoff+Range A
400,000 cy
1 years
20,000,000
Harbor
to STA 110
(assumed)
Inlet Relocation
850,000 cy
10 years
4,250,000
Bogue Inlet
IAIWWCrossingl
44,000 cy
1 2.5 years
880,000
Totals:
25,130,000
However, if all mentioned sources are incorporated (upland, AIWW, offshore, and inlets)
approximately 50,253,057 cy of material would be available and would meet the 50 -year
sediment need of 45 Mcy to 49.8 Mcy (46.8 to 51.6 Mcy with moderate sea level change).
The total volume available when the renewable and non-renewable sources are combined is
tabulated in Table 5-20.
Table 5-20: Total Volume Available
Source
50 -Yr Total Volume (cy)
Renewable
25,130,0000
Non -Renewable
25,123,057
TOTAL
50,253,057
5.11 Bogue Banks Master beach Nourishment Plan — Project #1
The initial project to be performed in Winter 2018/2019 will have the option of dredging
material from the Current and Old ODMDS. Figure 5-11 shows the location of the potential
borrow areas within the Current and Old ODMDS. A large portion of the potential borrow area
in the Current ODMDS was also used in 2013 for the Post -Irene nourishment project.
32

Legend - Elevation (ft NAVD88) 37,
M-56.53 - -56.00 -43 99 - -42.00
M -55.99 - -54.00 -41 99 - -40.00 OLD
M-53.99--52.000-3999--38.00 Approximately ODMDS
�-51.99--50.00-37.99--36.00 9.225,657 cy (EoO J 4
=49.99 - -48.00 -35 99 - -34.00 Above -52 ft NAV O R "8"
M-47.99 - -46.00 M -33.99 - -32.00 Q R
45.99 --44.00 M -31.99 - -30.00 4 © O O 3}J 46
0 2,000 4,000 6,000 i5
Feet
s Q�11 &AIJ
O O O O O
49
r SSS
\ n�
Approximately
2,711,727 cy
49(\ I r (@ O O p Above -52 ft NAVD88
/50 IV
51 16
l li`il}1 11 I,
\. 53 52
v
52 i������ 53� F1R2.5s /
3 � �
54 �r� 52 ri \ \\`�� 5 / 5�
�5
G ,1
� � l
CURRENT
Q C�
5S
ODMDS
7 111
Figure 5-11: Potential Borrow Areas Within the Current and Old ODMDS
Table 5-21 presents the sediment characteristics of the vibracores within the potential borrow
areas. Based on analysis of these vibracores, it is estimated that beach compatible material exists
down to an elevation of —52 ft NAVD88. Thus, plans will specify a dredge depth of -50 ft
NAVD88 with 2 ft of allowable overdredge. Volume calculations indicate roughly 2,711,727 cy
of material exists above —52 ft NAVD88 in the potential borrow area within the Current
ODMDS and 9,225,657 cy of material exists above -52 ft NAVD88 in the potential borrow area
within the Old ODMDS (see Figure 5-11). Therefore, the total volume available from the
potential borrow areas is 11,937,384 cy. While 1,519,030 cy is the expected placement volume,
the anticipated dredge volume could reach 1,974,740 cy due to losses typically incurred between
what is dredged and what is placed (approximately 30%).
33

w
0
m
0
m
0
V
0
m
0
N
0
A
0
W
0
N
0
2
0
O
0
0
0
m
0
W
0
N
o
+
g
O
0
N
m
A
O
N
W
+,
V
W
N
O
N
b
m
N
O1
A
1P0
N
J
W
J
J
N
J
N
V
N
V'
m
N
N
0
O
♦
O1
401
J
O
N+
A
J
N
Ip
J
W
m
W
0
3
G1
J
N
01
O
O1
0
N
W
m
QO
to
m
J
a
s
A
W
O1
OO
O)
0)
O1
W
00
W
N
N
N
N
9
0
D
Z S
m
O
N
W
N
T
fNli
W
A
W
OAC
V
O
A
O1
N
N
O1
J
N
b
N
O
W
N
ip
0
m
N
Oi
A
N
N
N
OO
J
0i
W
tb
N
V
V
V
N
J
N>
N
O
W
O1
A
A
N
A
Y
OPO
N
N
O1
O
m
W
N
Y
A
N
O
Ol
N
Ol
W
N
W
J
Ol
N
to
b
OI
m
N
W
N
OPO
N
1PJ
N
10
q
N
O
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
N
O
+
N
O
+
O
A
0
O
O
+
+
+
N
N
+
+
O
N
+
N
O
+
+
O
O
O
+
O
O
O
O
O
+
N
A
+
O
O
N
O
O
O
+
o
O
yi
N
b
O
Ol
J
Ol
N
O
Ip
U
N
N
W
00
OC
01
m
N
A
W
V
01
N
W
1D
O
t0
N
A
OD
N
A
W
W
A
po
a`
m
�I
f0.0
J
V
10.1
m
OOD
A
V
V
W
m
01
OI
{!�
V
O
N
100
U
N
1J.1
p
gj
N
m
O)
10
♦_
N
N
A
N
�
A
J
A
N
10.1
100
Ol
V
100
b
P
OI
N
m
m
J
m
N
m
�
m
N
N
Ol
000
IVD
�
m '� �
V
N
O
J
N
J
10
D7
O
�I
O
J
O
m
10
01
IJ
J
{!1
!J
A
O�
N
W
O
N
W
IJ
OC
OC
(O
OI
10
A
pl
W
41
O
0
DD
J
OC
A
1D
�
A
N
O1
01
J
N
10
N
J
V
t0
00
�
10
�
W
N
A
O1
1D
10
J
A
00
OI
10
!�1
!J
fal
O1
1�1
N
W
A
A
aD
1D
m
�
N
N
N
J
O1
f�l
n v�
C
N
P
00
O
Ol
J
pOp
Ol
N
m
O
Oi
O
100
N
J
O
�
O
N
O
O
W
O
N
O
V
tr
fqJ
O
N
O
tb
(Oy�
W
'�
Gl
P
m
PPi
01
J
N'
O
O
O
O
W
O
A
O
�
O
N
♦O
O)
O
m
W
f0
O
N
O
N
1P0
O
N
p O
O
O
Od
m
Ol
O
b
O
W
�
t0
W
C)
�
�
N
O
�
NO
p1
O
1. 00
p1
O
N
0
40i
0
m
O
N
O
tN0
p
N
3
1N.1
N
O
O
w
O
A
O
J
O
1N0
O
N
{Oy,1
O
O
m
O
N
O
tNp
O
N
O
O
O
W
OOOHO
O
{.O{�11
Ol
O
m
�
N
O
W
O
W
{.O{�11
P
1ON�
W
O
A
O
m
O
J
O
0
(,O{yI
W
{,OO�IO
A
11��11
t0
O
W
�yf
♦
O
W
(Oy�
OI
O
O
O
O
O
W
O
N>
O
N
1N0
N
O
0
�
00
Y
N
b
O
N
N
N
01
W
A
W
0
NO)
N
N
0
a w
o
+
+
o
o
+
o
+
+
o
+
o
+
+
o
-
o
+
+
+
-
+
+
Of
A
A
Opp1
W
',1
N
U
N
m
O
p+p
01
W
V
N
O
J
�
p
W
U
IND
1+p
O
p+p
OI
O
U
N
W
00
O
00C
A
N
N
P
b
41
G
�
Ol
U
N
O
0
O
tp
N
"'
N
INp
b
000
�
N
0
N
W
t00
<
cn
N
fR
N
N
(n
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
W
V
to
UI
N
N
N
�2
(0�
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
W
Vl
41
N
N
N
NW
N
N
VI
(7
W
N
N
O
O
N
O
O
A
+
O
+
W
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
1a o O
w
O
O
N
O
tr
O
N
O
U
O
CD
O
O
O
O
P
O
OO
O
D7
O
0
O
0
O
O
N
O
0
0
0
O
O
O
O
A
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
O
O
O
O
O
p
O
O
O
11 O
O
O
IJ
N
O
N
O
A
O
O
O
N
O
O
O
.
O
OO
+
O
O
+
0
O
O
P
O
W
W
O
O
O
tr
W
O
N
A
O
G
tb
O
O
+
N
O
+
N
O
N +
O
tp
O
+
N
O
+ N
O
W+
O
O
W
O
O
O
O
P
O
O
O
O
O
tr
N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
`O
3
y

6.0 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Pursuant to the NC State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), the environmental effects of
implementing the Bogue Banks MBNP have been evaluated in an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS). The Final EIS (FEIS) was distributed to state agencies through the NC State
Clearinghouse on March 8`h, 2018. This section presents a summary of the projected
environmental effects as described in the FEIS.
6.1 Marine Benthic Communities
6.1.1 Softbottom
Offshore borrow site dredging events at the ODMDS and/or Area Y would disturb
approximately 35 to 240 acres of soft bottom habitat every three years. Direct and indirect
effects on softbottom benthic communities within the dredging footprints would include short-
term direct impacts on benthic invertebrates via excavation and short-term indirect impacts on
demersal fishes via temporary reductions in the benthic prey base. Benthic recovery would
begin immediately upon the cessation of dredging operations; and it is anticipated that relatively
shallow dredge cuts, the mounded nature of the sand deposits at the ODMDS, and avoidance of
peak benthic infaunal recruitment periods would facilitate relatively rapid dredge cut infilling
and benthic community recovery.
Sand placement within the subtidal portions of the beach fill footprints would result in the burial
and temporary loss of the associated soft bottom benthic invertebrate infauna and epifauna.
Benthic recovery would begin immediately upon the cessation of placement operations; and it is
anticipated that the use of beach compatible material and avoidance of peak invertebrate
recruitment periods would facilitate relatively rapid benthic community recovery. Losses of
benthic invertebrate prey may affect the foraging activities of demersal surf zone fishes;
however, recruitment of opportunistic benthic taxa to the disturbed areas would provide
substantial prey resources within a relatively short period of time, and the distribution of
alternative soft bottom habitats within the overall project area is expansive.
6.1.2 Hardbottom
As described in the FEIS, comprehensive remote sensing and ground-truthing surveys indicate
that hardbottom features are absent from the nearshore ocean zone along Bogue Banks (shore to
2,500 feet). Therefore, sand placement would not be expected to have any adverse effects on
hardbottom habitats. Remote sensing surveys of the offshore borrow sites conducted by Hall
(2008, 2011) found no hardbottoms within 500 in of the former and current ODMDS offshore
borrow sites. The surveys identified a series of low relief hardbottom features to the east and
south of the Area Y 90/120 and Y-75/80 borrow sites. The Area Y 90/120 borrow site is
separated from the nearest identified hardbottom feature by a distance of 1,000 in. The Y-75/80
borrow site is separated from the nearest identified hardbottom feature by a distance of at least
500 m; however, the survey area did not include the northernmost portion of the Y-75/80 borrow
site. The line of identified hardbottoms appears to be trending northeast and away from the
northern portion of Y-75/80; however, additional geotechnical investigations will be conducted
prior to any use of the Y-75/80 borrow site to verify that no hardbottom features are present
within 500-m of the proposed dredging footprint. These investigations would also be used to
35

determine specific pipeline placement corridors for the conveyance of dredge material from the
Area Y borrow sites to the beach. Based on these considerations, offshore borrow site dredging
operations are not expected to have any adverse effects on hardbottom habitat.
6.2 Ocean Water Quality
Offshore borrow site dredging would involve the extraction of beach -compatible sand with a
very small fine sediment fraction, thus indicating that the effects of dredging -induced sediment
suspension on marine water quality and pelagic communities would be short-term and localized.
Increases in suspended sediment concentrations and turbidity attributable to sand placement
would also be expected in the surf zone along the management reaches. However, as described
in the FEIS, the results of water quality monitoring during nourishment operations along Bogue
Banks and other southeastern NC beaches indicate that turbidity increases are typically confined
to the surf zone in the immediate vicinity of the slurry discharge point. Furthermore, it is
anticipated that the beach -compatible composition of the material and the use of temporary dikes
and spreaders to contain the discharged sand slurry would reduce the extent of sediment
suspension. Therefore, it is anticipated that sediment suspension effects attributable to sand
placement would be short-term and localized.
6.3 Ocean Beach and Dune Communities
6.3.1 Intertidal Beach
Beach construction activities may disrupt shorebird foraging activities and/or prevent shorebirds
from using otherwise suitable intertidal beach foraging habitats. However, the effects of
disturbance would be short-term and localized to the vicinity of the active construction zone.
Sand placement on top of the existing intertidal beach substrate would eliminate the majority of
the intertidal benthic invertebrate infauna through direct burial. However, it is expected that the
use of compatible sediments in accordance with State Sediment Criteria and avoidance of peak
benthic infaunal recruitment periods would facilitate relatively rapid benthic community
recovery. As described in the FEIS, most benthic recovery studies have reported rapid recovery
within one year of the initial impact when highly compatible beach fill sediments were used and
larval recruitment periods were avoided. Direct impacts on intertidal benthic communities may
affect shorebirds and demersal surf zone fishes by temporarily reducing the availability of
benthic infaunal prey. However, it is anticipated that relatively rapid benthic infaunal
recruitment would provide substantial prey resources along the disturbed reaches within a
relatively short period of time, and substantial undisturbed intertidal beach foraging habitat
would be available within the action area during benthic recovery periods. Therefore, it is
expected that the impacts of sand placement on intertidal beach communities would be short
term and localized.
6.3.2 Dry Beach and Dune Communities
Dry beach (berm) and dune construction would involve the use of bulldozers and other heavy
machinery to redistribute and grade the placed material according to design profile
specifications. Construction activities would directly impact ghost crabs and dune vegetation
through burial and/or mechanical disturbance. However, it is anticipated that the replanting of
constructed dunes with native species would facilitate dune stabilization and plant community
recovery. Furthermore, it is anticipated that the use of compatible beach fill and avoidance of
36

peak recruitment periods would facilitate relatively rapid ghost crab recovery. As described in
the FEIS, post -nourishment monitoring studies have reported relatively minor and short-term
effects on ghost crab populations when highly compatible beach fill sediments were used and
peak recruitment periods were avoided. Beach construction activities; including heavy
equipment operations, generator use, night-time lighting, and other related activities; may disrupt
shorebird activities and/or prevent shorebirds from using otherwise suitable dry beach roosting
and loafing habitats. However, the effects of disturbance would be short-term and localized to
the vicinity of the active construction zone. Nourishment projects would avoid the sea turtle
nesting and hatching season through adherence to a 16 Nov -30 April sand placement
environmental window. Therefore, direct impacts on nesting females, nests, or hatchlings would
not be expected. Beach nourishment may indirectly affect sea turtles through physical
modification of dry beach nesting habitat. Measures employed to minimize adverse effects on
nesting habitat would include the use of compatible sediments, escarpment monitoring, and
sediment compaction monitoring. It is expected that these measures would minimize the extent
and duration of any habitat -modification effects on sea turtles.
6.4 Inlet and Estuarine Communities
6.4.1 Water Quality
Bogue Inlet realignment dredging would be conducted by cutterhead dredges. As described in
the FEIS, sediment suspension by cutterhead dredges is typically confined to the near bottom
water column and is typically short term and localized when the dredged material is composed of
relatively clean sand with a minimal fine silt/clay fraction. Analyses of vibracore samples from
the proposed ebb channel realignment footprint have characterized the sediments as highly
compatible sand with a very small fine sediment fraction of less than two percent. Therefore, it
is anticipated that sediment suspension effects attributable to inlet realignment dredging would
be short-term and localized.
6.4.2 Estuarine Subtidal Softbottom
Bogue Inlet ebb channel realignments would directly impact —35 acres of estuarine soft bottom
habitat within the new channel excavation footprint. Dredging would remove the majority of the
associated soft bottom benthic infaunal and epifaunal invertebrates; resulting in an initial sharp
decline in community abundance, diversity, and biomass within the new channel footprint. The
removal of benthic invertebrate prey may temporarily affect the foraging activities of predatory
demersal fishes. However, as described in the FEIS, studies of benthic community recovery in
dredged navigation channels along the southeastern coast have reported rapid recovery within six
months. Rapid recovery has been attributed to recolonization via slumping of adjacent
undisturbed sediments into the dredged channel and avoidance of spring benthic invertebrate
recruitment periods. The project construction window (16 Nov -30 April) would avoid peak
benthic invertebrate recruitment periods; and therefore, it is anticipated that impacts on estuarine
soft bottom communities would be short term and localized.
6.4.3 Intertidal Flats and Shoals
Bogue Inlet ebb channel realignment dredging may directly impact mid -inlet intertidal shoals
within the new channel excavation footprint, depending on the configuration of shoals at the time
of realignment events. Any intertidal shoals that are present within the new channel footprint at
37

the time of realignment events would be excavated and converted to subtidal soft bottom habitat.
Any direct losses of intertidal habitat and associated benthic invertebrates may temporarily
reduce foraging opportunities for shorebirds and demersal fishes. However, it is expected that
losses would be offset by new intertidal habitat formation via dredged material placement along
the Bogue Banks inlet shoulder, natural shoaling of the old channel, and subsequent expansion of
the Bogue Banks sand spit.
Realignments of the ebb channel would modify patterns of flow and initiate a period of sediment
redistribution and habitat reconfiguration within the inlet complex. During the adjustment
period, the distribution and areal extent of intertidal flats and shoals within the inlet complex
would be expected to fluctuate in response to sediment redistribution and related conversions
between supratidal, intertidal, and subtidal habitats. The post -realignment habitat
reconfiguration process would produce corresponding changes in the distribution and
composition of intertidal benthic communities. However, habitat fluctuations would be
consistent with the dynamic nature of inlet habitats and the habitat changes associated with
natural ebb channel repositioning events that occur periodically in Bogue Inlet. Based on the
opportunistic nature of the dominant benthic taxa and gradual pace of the inlet reconfiguration
process, it is expected that benthic community adjustments would generally occur with only
minor, short-term reductions in community levels of abundance, diversity, and biomass.
6.4.4 Larval Transport
Cutterhead dredging in Bogue Inlet would entrain the planktonic eggs and larvae of estuarine
dependent fishes and invertebrates that occur in the vicinity of the dredge pipe suction field.
However, as described in the FEIS, modeling studies of larval entrainment in Beaufort Inlet
indicate that dredge entrainment rates are extremely low regardless of inlet larval concentrations
and the distribution of larvae within the water column. Therefore, infrequent cutterhead
dredging in Bogue Inlet every 10 to 15 years would not be expected to have any measurable
effect on estuarine -dependent fish and invertebrate populations.
6.4.5 Shellfish, Submerged Aquatic Vegetation, Tidal Marsh
Shellfish beds, submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV), and tidal marshes are generally restricted to
waters inland of the Bogue Inlet channel realignment footprint. As described in the FEIS,
NCDMF benthic habitat maps, SAV maps developed by NOAA and NCDMF, and coastal
wetland maps developed by the NCDCM do not show any shell bottom, SAV, or tidal marsh
habitats within the proposed channel. Therefore, direct impacts on shellfish, SAV, and tidal
marsh habitats would not be expected. Fine sediments suspended by the dredging process may
be transported inland and redeposited in areas containing shellfish beds and/or SAV; however,
based on the composition of the dredged material (sand with minimal fines), it is expected that
any sediment suspension and redeposition effects would be minor.
6.5 Cultural Resources
Remote sensing surveys did not identify any potential archaeological resources in the vicinity of
the ODMDS or Area Y offshore borrow sites (Hall 2011). Ebb channel relocations would
realign the channel to the previously dredged 2005 channel footprint; which prior surveys
indicate does not contain cultural resources. Therefore, the project would not be expected to
38

have any adverse effects on cultural resources. The full archeological report can be found in
Appendix D (Archaeological Remote Sensing).
6.6 Avoidance and Minimization
All beach placement activities under the Master Beach Nourishment Plan will be covered under
the USFWS Statewide Programmatic Biological Opinion per consultations. The following are
measures that would be implemented to reduce the impacts of the project:
6.6.1 Environmental Windows
All sand placement, dredging, and associated construction activities would adhere to a 16
November to 30 April environmental window.
6.6.2 Sediment Compatibility
All material placed on the beach and in associated dune systems would consist of beach
compatible sand that meets NC Technical Standards for Beach Fill Projects (15A NCAC 07H
.0312). Monitoring of fill material at the pipeline outfall would be conducted throughout sand
placement operations.
6.6.3 Construction Methods
Sand Placement
• Construction equipment would access the beach via existing public access corridors to
the maximum extent practicable.
• Temporary storage areas for construction equipment would be located off the beach to
the maximum extent practicable.
• Construction staging areas and pipeline routes would be located so as to avoid piping
plover critical habitat and other high-value shorebird/waterbird inlet complex habitats to
the maximum extent practicable.
• Operations would avoid disturbing dunes to the maximum extent practicable. Any
unavoidable dune alterations would be coordinated with NCDCM, and the disturbed
areas would be restored to their original grade and position relative to the surveyed
normal high water line. Once restored to grade, any impacted dunes would be replanted
with native dune grass species during the optimal planting season.
• Pipelines would be equipped with spreaders to reduce effluent discharge velocities during
sand -slurry placement. Temporary longitudinal sand dikes would be used to contain and
direct the horizontal flow of the discharged sand -slurry along the beach. These measures
would maximize sediment retention within the designated placement area, thereby
minimizing potential surf zone turbidity effects.
• Sand delivery pipelines would be routinely inspected for pressurized leaks, and any leaks
that are found would be immediately repaired.
39

Dredging
• All hopper dredges would be equipped with rigid draghead deflectors, thereby
minimizing the risk of sea turtle and sturgeon entrainment. Dredging contracts would
include specifications for the proper installation and operation of rigid dragheads to
ensure effective mitigation of the entrainment risk.
• To reduce the risk of sea turtle entrainment, relocation trawling would be initiated at the
onset of each hopper dredging project as determined through Section 7 consultations with
NMFS.
Prior to the initiation of each dredging project, proposed pump -out station anchor point
locations and sand delivery pipeline routes would be evaluated by the awarded Contractor
for the presence of hardbottom habitats and cultural resources. Based on the survey
results, proposed anchor points and pipeline routes would be adjusted by the Contractor
to avoid any hardbottom sites in accordance with NC CAMA regulations (500-m buffer).
Similarly, anchor points and pipeline routes would be adjusted to avoid any cultural
resource sites based on coordination with the SHPO.
Dredging contractors would be required to maintain spill control plans and waste
management plans for all dredging fleet equipment.
6.6.4 Monitoring
Sediment Compaction
Immediately after construction and to the maximum extent practicable prior to 1 May, the limits
of construction areas would be evaluated for sediment compaction in coordination with the
USFWS and NCWRC. If it is determined that tilling is required for sea turtle nesting habitat
suitability, the construction areas would be tilled to a depth of 36 inches. All tilling activity shall
be completed prior to 1 May to the maximum extent practicable. Any tilling activities that are
required after 1 May would be coordinated with the USFWS or NCWRC. A summary of
compaction monitoring efforts and tilling actions taken would be submitted to the USACE and
the USFWS.
Escarpments
Immediately after construction and to the maximum extent practicable prior to 1 May, surveys
for escarpments would be conducted within the limits of construction areas. Identified
escarpments that that may interfere with sea turtle nesting (> 18 inches in height and > 100 ft in
length) would be leveled to the natural beach profile. If it is determined that escarpment leveling
is required after 1 May, leveling activities would be coordinated with the USFWS or NCWRC.
An annual summary of escarpment surveys and leveling actions taken would be submitted to the
USACE and USFWS.
40

7.0 COMPLIANCE WITH CARTERET COUNTY ZONING AND CAMA
LAND USE PLAN
The beach nourishment project is consistent with the approved CAMA Land Use Plans for
Carteret County and the Towns of Emerald Isle, Indian Beach. Salter Path, Pine Knoll Shores,
and Atlantic Beach. The project property is within the planning jurisdiction of Carteret County
and the Towns of Emerald Isle, Indian Beach. Salter Path, Pine Knoll Shores, and Atlantic Beach
and is classified "Developed" by the CAMA Land Use Plan.
8.0 COMPLIANCE WITH THE NC ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT
The Division of Coastal Management has determined prior to the application that review of this
project under SEPA is not be required.
The North Carolina Division of Water Quality in Wilmington will be provided a full copy of the
NCDCM permit application describing the scope of the project and requesting a 401 Water
Quality Certification.
9.0 CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS
Perpetual beach nourishment easements are in place for the oceanfront in Emerald Isle, Indian
Beach. Salter Path, Pine Knoll Shores, and Atlantic Beach. The easements were acquired in
2001 and 2002 as part of the financed beach nourishment projects that were completed in the
spring of 2002 for the Towns. The perpetual easements are for any part of private property that
visibly appears to be a part of the ocean beach strand and is covered with little or no vegetation,
is seaward of the last line of stable vegetation, is within the frontal sand dune, or is seaward of
the erosion escarpment. The easement allows all work necessary to nourish the beach.
However, the Towns cannot damage permanent improvements in the easement area but must
work with property owners to remove and replace permanent improvements in the easement area
that obstruct nourishment.
41

10.0 REFERENCES
Coastal Tech. 2013 (March). Carteret County North Carolina Sand Search Investigation: Draft
Final Geotechnical Report. Coastal Tech, Melbourne, FL.
Dial Cordy and Associates. 2018 (March). Final Environmental Impact Statement, Bogue Banks
Master Beach Nourishment Plan. EIS for NC Department of Environment and Natural
Resources, Division of Coastal Management; submitted by Carteret County, NC; prepared by
Dial Cordy and Associates, Wilmington, NC.
Mid -Atlantic Technology and Environmental Research, Inc. 2011 (September). An
Archaeological Remote Sensing and Target Identification Survey of Bogue Banks Offshore
Borrow Areas Q2, Y1, and ODMDS, Carteret County, NC. Mid -Atlantic Technology and
Environmental Research, Inc., Castle Hayne, NC
Moffatt & Nichol. 2014 (February). Bogue Banks Master Beach Nourishment Plan. Moffatt &
Nichol, Raleigh, NC.
42

AGENT AUTHORIZATION
LETTER

April 11, 2018
Shore Protection Office, Carteret County
POB 4297 TEL: [phone]
Emerald Isle, NC 28594 FAX: [phone]
NC Division of Coastal Management
Morehead City Regional Office
400 Commerce Avenue TEL: [phone]
Morehead City, North Carolina 28557 FAX: [phone]
RE: Bogue Banks Master Beach Nourishment Plan, Carteret County
Authorized Agent Agreement
To Whom it May Concern:
This is to inform you that Moffatt and Nichol is the Authorized Agent for the above -referenced
project. Moffatt and Nichol is authorized to act on behalf of the applicant on matters related to
the CAMA Major permit and related federal permits.
Please call me if you have any questions or need additional information.
Sincerely,
Rudi Rudolph
Shore Protection Manager, Carteret County

AEC HAZARD NOTICE

Greg L. Rudolph
el: [phone]
ix: [phone]
Iickey Sugg, Project Manager
1.S. Army Corps of Engineers
-9 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
uv6er+et cadexnty
NG
protection office
Bogue Banks Master Beach Nourishment Plan - Project #1
Event Notification Letter
Sugg (Mickey),
Carteret County is in the process of obtaining federal and state permits to allow
implementation of the Master Beach Nourishment Plan (MBNP) as a non-federal shoreline
protection and inlet management project over a 50 -year period of time during which
nourishment events will be initiated based on minimum sand volumes required to maintain
protection from a 25 -year storm event as well as federally -declared storm events which
cause damage and erosion to the beach.
As determined during the development and implementation of the MBNP, the Carteret
County Shore Protection Office would provide notice in advance of an anticipated
renourishment event. This letter serves as notification of the first project implemented
under the MBNP, also described herein as Bogue Banks MBNP - Project #1. Moffatt &
Nichol, as the authorized agent for the County, has developed the subsequent
documentation provided in this letter request which details the dredging volume, dredging
depth, placement reaches and sediment compatibility.
The Bogue Banks MBNP - Project #1
through 30 April 2019. Current plans call for
9.5 miles of shoreline in Emerald Isle, Indian
an average fill density of 30 cy/ft. Beach
portions of the Current and Old ODMDS.
ur review of these
me at 252-222-5835
Greg "rudi" Rudolph
Shore Protection Manager
will take place during 16 November 2018
1,519,030 cy of material to be placed along
Beach, Salter Path, and Pine Knoll Shores at
compatible sediment will be dredged from
ind proceeding as efficiently
Martin at 919-781-4626 with
MP
Protection Office • P.O. Box 4297 • Emerald Isle, North Carolina
h- www , protect the beach. com
017

Protection Manager
Greg L. Rudolph
el: [phone]
ax: [phone]
ne 12, 2018
ickey Sugg, Project Manager
J.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, NC 28403
s1w"Itlare
protection office
c alae:-reraac) cam
Re: Bogue Banks Master Beach Nourishment Plan - Project #1
Event Notification Letter
Dear Mr. Sugg (Mickey),
Carteret County is in the process of obtaining federal and state permits to allow
implementation of the Master Beach Nourishment Plan (MBNP) as a non-federal shoreline
protection and inlet management project over a 50 -year period of time during which
nourishment events will be initiated based on minimum sand volumes required to maintain
protection from a 25 -year storm event as well as federally -declared storm events which
cause damage and erosion to the beach.
As determined during the development and implementation of the MBNP, the Carteret
County Shore Protection Office would provide notice in advance of an anticipated
renourishment event. This letter serves as notification of the first project implemented
under the MBNP, also described herein as Bogue Banks MBNP - Project #1. Moffatt &
Nichol, as the authorized agent for the County, has developed the subsequent
documentation provided in this letter request which details the dredging volume, dredging
depth, placement reaches and sediment compatibility.
The Bogue Banks MBNP - Project #1 will take place during 16 November 2018
through 30 April 2019. Current plans call for 1,519,030 cy of material to be placed along
9.5 miles of shoreline in Emerald Isle, Indian Beach, Salter Path, and Pine Knoll Shores at
an average fill density of 30 cy/ft. Beach compatible sediment will be dredged from
portions of the Current and Old ODMDS.
We appreciate your review of these materials and proceeding as efficiently as
possible. Please contact me at 252-222-5835 or Johnny Martin at 919-781-4626 with any
questions.
Respectfully,
G eg -rudi" Rudolph
Shore Protection Manager
RECEIVED
JUN 15 2018
MP SECTION WIRO
Shore Protection Office • P.O. Box 4297 • Emerald Isle, North Carolina 28594
www. protect the beach. com

CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH NOURISHMENT PLAN
PROJECT #1 EVENT NOTIFICATION
) PROJECT DESCRIPTION
`fhe Bogue Banks Master Beach Nourishment Plan — Project #I is anticipated to take place during
winter 2018/2019. Current plans call for 1,519,030 cy of material to be placed along 9.5 miles of
:shoreline in Emerald Isle, Indian Beach, Salter Path, and Pine Knoll Shores. This is an average
f ill density of 30 cy/ft however it is expected that the fill density will vary between 25 cy/ft and 50
cy/ft. This correlates to a berm width ranging from 35 ft to 85 ft with an average of approximately
55 ft. Figure 1-1 shows the planned placement locations and volumes. Approximately 1,974,740
cy of beach compatible material will be dredged from portions of the Current and Old ODMDS as
presented in Figure 1-l. Permit drawings are provided in Attachment A.
Figure 1-1: Bogue Banks Master Beach Nourishment Plan — Project #1 (Winter
2018/2019)
Reach 1 and Reach 2 represent a continuous section of fill starting just west of Transect 35 at 2901
Pointe West Drive in Emerald Isle and ending just east of Transect 52 at 1401 Salter Path Road in
Salter Path. Reach 3 and Reach 4 represent a continuous section of fill starting just west of
Transect 55 at 199 Hoffman Beach Road in Salter Path and ending just east of Transect 76 at 119
Salter Path Road in Pine Knoll Shores.
RECEIVED
.IUN 15 2018 1
MP SECTION WIRO
CARTERET COUNTY
-
t;
t ItitsraI=st"ita►Milft;�sitotiltl€
_ "' ►
,
SEAUFORT
IRLET
i
35�15.ia9iiiEiiiS*�3iYs
-i
aSe
9c.7 ,
„165
i i
-.' . � _ ii i
�k
httas3n1'a90e11cae4s.51
t�a 1p3
gtltM mile -
t
se.,S3g 3.5
se.,
Ns I$$95_
�- o
:
�ta
5M-� b
_ .
...
80GUe
S£MmRN�en
P lermsi
eaET
4T2.^�Ne.s_ .-
Barrow
Are"
.�.A ...
ONSLOWaAY
current
IOO NDS
0 0.5 1 2 3
vpMk.
Figure 1-1: Bogue Banks Master Beach Nourishment Plan — Project #1 (Winter
2018/2019)
Reach 1 and Reach 2 represent a continuous section of fill starting just west of Transect 35 at 2901
Pointe West Drive in Emerald Isle and ending just east of Transect 52 at 1401 Salter Path Road in
Salter Path. Reach 3 and Reach 4 represent a continuous section of fill starting just west of
Transect 55 at 199 Hoffman Beach Road in Salter Path and ending just east of Transect 76 at 119
Salter Path Road in Pine Knoll Shores.
RECEIVED
.IUN 15 2018 1
MP SECTION WIRO

The borrow area covers approximately 773 acres, with 218 acres located in the Current ODMDS
in Federal waters and 555 acres located in the Old ODDMS in State waters. It is anticipated that
if the dredging is confined to the portion of the borrow area located in the Current ODMDS, the
average cut depth will be approximately 5-7 ft based on a maximum dredge depth of -50 ft
NAVD88 with 2 ft allowable overdredge. If the dredging expands into the Old ODMDS, it is
anticipated that the average cut depth will between 2-3 ft due to the larger area to dredge within.
It should be noted that while the Old ODMDS contains large mounds of material comprising
approximately 15 ft of compatible cut material, a majority of this material will not be necessary to
meet the potential dredge requirement of 1,974,740 cy and therefore it is expected that only 2-3
feet would be dredged from the top.
It should be noted that this initial project is essentially the "Year 6" nourishment, as presented in
the Master Beach Nourishment Plan, rather than "Year 3". As time has progressed during the
formulation and permitting of the Master Beach Nourishment Plan, a need has developed to start
the project with "Year 6".
The 2017 annual monitoring analysis indicated that there were several transects that were
approaching the minimum volume trigger for the 25 -year level of protection. Figure 1-2 presents
the volume above -12 ft NAVD88 for each transect based on the 2017 monitoring data in
comparison to the volumes required for the 25 year and 50 -year levels of protection. As can be
seen, there are transects located in Emerald Isle East, Indian Beach/Salter Path, and Pine Knoll
Shores that are all approaching the 25 -year level of protection. Given that it has been 5 years since
the previous nourishment project was completed (post -Irene, 2013), Carteret County and the
Towns have chosen to be proactive in moving forward with the next project to avoid consequences
from any storms that may impact the area in the next few years as the beach approaches the
minimum volume for protection.
RECEIVED 2
JUN 15 2018
NIP SECTION WIRO

2017 Volume Above -12 k NAVD88
W
W
130
a9
410
400
509"
I.I.t
(1-11)
fa0erei0
hN
Went
(12.25)
Emerald
We
Central
WIN)
El—Al
IW
East
(3748)
IrAln1
ee..h
Salter
path
(49-58)
Phe
EnON
Shan
159-761
Atb.&
B -ch
(77.102)
y
X25 yr InP
— �SOKtaP
390
3'
360
350
—------
3
330
330
)
)
y 3
aj
370
i1
—
i
310
�
777
796
280
— —
—-
260
--
750
_
j$
2b
230
RL
27061
210
y1i
190
+is
tpj
j3
160
'111
13�
�t
e
^ ^' '^ ^ p1 ., .. .. .. .. n .. n n n m m m n n♦♦ i. 3 m m a m a a m a a a w w r r r m m m m m m m m m m w
Trdnse[[
Figure 1-2: 2017 Monitoring Volume Analysis
2.0 METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION
The Bogue Banks Master Beach Nourishment Plan — Project #1 to be performed in Winter
2018/2019 will use a hopper dredge to obtain material from the Current and Old ODMDS where
it will then be transported to an offshore temporary mooring and submerged pipeline near the
project site. The hopper dredge will then connect to the pipeline and pump the material from the
hopper to the beach where the sand is spread mechanically by bulldozers. As mentioned
previously, this is the same type of dredging placement operation used during Phase 1 and most of
Phase 2 of the Bogue Banks beach nourishment projects completed in winter of 2001-2002 and
2002-2003 (respectively) as well as the Post-Ophelia (2007) and Post -Irene (2013) projects.
3.0 SEDIMENT COMPATIBILITY
The Bogue Banks Master Beach Nourishment Plan — Project #1 to be performed in Winter
2018/2019 will have the option of dredging material from the Current and Old ODMDS. Figure
3-1 shows the location of the potential borrow areas within the Current and Old ODMDS. A
substantial portion of the potential borrow area in the Current ODMDS was also used in 2013 for
the Post -Irene nourishment project.
RECEIVED 3
JUN 15 2018
MP SECTION WIRO

Legend - Elevation (ft NAVD88)
M 58.53 - -56.00 M -43.99 - -42.00
M-55.99 - -54.00 M 41.99 - -40.00
M -53.99 - -52.00 M -39.99 - -38.00
M -51.99 - -50.00 ® -37.99 - -36.00
M 49.99 --48.00 M -35.99 - -34.00
M 47.99 --46.00 M 33.99 - -32.00
M 45.99 --44.00 M 31.99 - -30.00
K
0 2-000 4,000 6.000 v
Feet
s
49 � ..
4',9 3'S,
I
I r
44 '
.I f'
I .510
51\ I
I r
` 502
53r
v
\ 54 .
i
1
CURRENT
Elm
Approximately
8.226,887 cY
ove -82 ft NAVD88
52
�M.
4
RI
QR
W
MI
Approximately
2,711,727 tY
Above -52 It NAVD88
Figure 3-1: Potential Borrow Areas Within the Current and Old ODMDS
Based on analysis of the native beach sediment data from 64 samples (16 transects) investigated
by CSE in 2001, a median grain size of 0.3 mm was selected as the best representation of the native
beach. The native beach characteristics and fill requirements established for the project are
presented in Table 3-1.
RECEIVED
JUN 15 2018 4
MP SECTION WIRO
�
51
L
R'4" 52
53
I
R R 2.5s
5
54
.
Q +,', � N
54
'J4,,
,.
t..
Figure 3-1: Potential Borrow Areas Within the Current and Old ODMDS
Based on analysis of the native beach sediment data from 64 samples (16 transects) investigated
by CSE in 2001, a median grain size of 0.3 mm was selected as the best representation of the native
beach. The native beach characteristics and fill requirements established for the project are
presented in Table 3-1.
RECEIVED
JUN 15 2018 4
MP SECTION WIRO

Table 3-1: Native Beach Characteristics and Rule Parameters
Characteristic
2001 Native
NCAC Required Borrow
Requirements Site Parameters
Fines (<#230)
Reported: 0%, Assumed: <1%
<1%+5% <6%
Sand (>#230 & <#10)
Reported at 98.68%
- -
Granular (># 10 & <#4)
Reported combined at 1.32%,
Assumed 0.7% each
0.7%+5% :56%
Gravel (>#4)
0.7%+5% —6%
Calcium Carbonate
Reported at 15-20%
20%+15% < 35%
In addition, Moffatt & Nichol conducted a field investigation on May 24, 2018 to estimate the total
number of sediments and shell material greater than or equal to three inches in diameter, observable
on the surface of the beach between mean low water and the frontal dune toe, in a 50,000 square
foot area. Investigations were performed in two locations, one in Atlantic Beach between
Transects 78 and 80 and one in Emerald Isle between Transects 29 and 30. The Atlantic Beach
investigation area has never been nourished and the Emerald Isle investigation area has only been
nourished once. Results of the investigation found 138 pieces of shell material greater than or
equal to three inches in diameter at Atlantic Beach and 211 pieces of shell material greater than or
equal to three inches in diameter at Emerald Isle.
Vibracores within the borrow area were analyzed with respect to parameters as presented in Table
3-1 to determine the quantity and depth to which beach compatible material exists within the
borrow area. Table 3-2 presents the sediment characteristics of the vibracores within the potential
borrow areas. Based on analysis of these vibracores, it is estimated that beach compatible material
exists down to an elevation of —52 ft NAVD88. Thus, plans will specify a dredge depth of -50 ft
NAVD88 with 2 ft of allowable overdredge. Volume calculations indicate 2,711,727 cy of
material exists above —52 ft NAVD88 in the potential borrow area within the Current ODMDS
and 9,225,657 cy of material exists above -52 ft NAVD88 in the potential borrow area within the
Old ODMDS (see Figure 3-1). Therefore, the total volume available from the potential borrow
areas is 11,937,384 cy. While 1,519,030 cy is the expected placement volume, the anticipated
dredge volume could reach 1,974,740 cy due to losses typically incurred between what is dredged
and what is placed (up to 30%).
RECEIVED
JUN 15 2018 5
MP SECTION WIRO

Cl)
m m
0z 0
4 m
0
z < m
TC Oo
0
:Wd
0
Ilk,
0
J
44 e. b
6
4.
1 �4 �4 �4
.
z
61
61
&1
61
61
46.
4�
PD
6,
..
61
.
L
.
.
mY
rn
zi
e
e
Z
5
e, e
e
e
e
el
e-
a
Z"p
8g
a,
42
_R
S4
-
- - - -
-
-
-
-
- -tP
o
1.
.1
lo
O

4.0 TYPICAL CROSS-SECTION AND PLAN VIEWS
Figure 4-1 through Figure 4-4 present typical cross-section and plan views for the area to be
nourished during the Bogue Banks Master Beach Nourishment Plan — Project #1, which will
extend from Transect 35 in Emerald Isle Central to Transect 76 in Pine Knoll Shores, with a small
break from Transect 53 — 55 in Indian Beach/Salter Path. These typical cross section and plan
views were developed for the permit process based on the newest March 2018 survey data. Slight
adjustments within the permit guidelines might be made prior to construction based on pre -
construction surveys. While the average fill density for the project is approximately 30 cy/ft, this
value will vary at each transect across the reaches based on the existing conditions. However, it
is expected that the fill density will remain between 25 cy/ft and 50 cy/ft throughout the project.
Figure 4-5 and Figure 4-6 present the site plan and typical cross sections for the proposed borrow
area located in the Current and Old ODMDS.
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,300 1,400 1,500
Distance Offshore (ft)
—March 2018 —Template
Figure 4-1: Reach 1 and 2 Typical Cross Section
RECEIVED 7
JUN 15 2018
MP SECTION WIRO
MMMMOMM2111
gr
Berm Width 57 ft
Fill Density 38 cy/ft
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,300 1,400 1,500
Distance Offshore (ft)
—March 2018 —Template
Figure 4-1: Reach 1 and 2 Typical Cross Section
RECEIVED 7
JUN 15 2018
MP SECTION WIRO

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,DOD 1,100 1,200 1,300 1,400 1,500
Distance Offshore (ft)
—March 2018 —Template
Figure 4-2: Reach 3 and 4 Typical Cross Section
RECEIVED
8
JUN 15 2018
MP SECTION WIRO
Bogue Banks Transect 62
20
is
16
-
14
12
10
8
6
Berm EI = +6.0 NAD88
BermWidth=51ft
4
_._
Fill Density = 36 cY/ft
2
0
0 2
m-_
l.. -------' -- - - --- - - -
a
W
-6
-8
-10
-12
14
16
-18
20
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,DOD 1,100 1,200 1,300 1,400 1,500
Distance Offshore (ft)
—March 2018 —Template
Figure 4-2: Reach 3 and 4 Typical Cross Section
RECEIVED
8
JUN 15 2018
MP SECTION WIRO

-�v
m
n
"i
0
5Z
0
m
m
n
_m
C
m
v
- — - -
- — -
_ _
�� EL ex
T -,
- -
-;,.,
Giro: • 'M`I'n 41llw �� lel Jl . 1 —
- _. __-
'JWP
E7fI8TNG no
M. f.' '_ r-•.Il-r'r -- -- ,i �e `.. IJr.li -- .1I ,��. ....
4. '.r }W�
W L�wlw–_...�–M1w—...
I.,l fr
_
----- W
.._M.w--...—M.w—..._yLw—...—
—
'--PROPMED P&W - - - - - -
w = ATLAWIC OMAN
I
I- CO'CL�VD. !
I
V K LLC.
VCPJRIL
1 y; 4 t;m*.. I
E ,•yy,gLg�
� I
I� g i V I ; pE.
I
I n1C 1 1 I.
PXOPLIt Y6
LLC' IOLVYI!
ENAP1001 0 YLV•Y
I
�.
SJ./iQC.�
.. AI'.16�'.(di
J C U
CAr;IIIN
•
QE9+1'lLi..
r Y4TF[YS
-_. I.
_ _. I
1spp��;hYtl.�
OOutiJ4kTLtll
$'9t"L
1
I
-. I.
I
m _
_D
,
PRo"r nw- CARTERET COUNTY, PAEPARm rm CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA ShIFEr n7w; SHEET
80011E BANKS MASTER BEACH
NCURroFNIENT PLAN - PROJECT 1 RENOURISHMENT PLAN - SHEET S of 37 7
ar
PREPARED BM YOlfATT&NO)IOL OA7E WY901f r•_I,%T
Figure 4-3: Reach 1 and 2 Typical Plan View
E
_ _
�� EL ex
FXISENOEMN
_. - - •,. -- -
Giro: • 'M`I'n 41llw �� lel Jl . 1 —
- _. __-
'JWP
E7fI8TNG no
M. f.' '_ r-•.Il-r'r -- -- ,i �e `.. IJr.li -- .1I ,��. ....
4. '.r }W�
W L�wlw–_...�–M1w—...
I.,l fr
_
----- W
.._M.w--...—M.w—..._yLw—...—
—
'--PROPMED P&W - - - - - -
w = ATLAWIC OMAN
I
PRo"r nw- CARTERET COUNTY, PAEPARm rm CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA ShIFEr n7w; SHEET
80011E BANKS MASTER BEACH
NCURroFNIENT PLAN - PROJECT 1 RENOURISHMENT PLAN - SHEET S of 37 7
ar
PREPARED BM YOlfATT&NO)IOL OA7E WY901f r•_I,%T
Figure 4-3: Reach 1 and 2 Typical Plan View
E

CD
m
z
m
m
0
m
m
v
PRAECT nAE' CARTERET COUNTY. PREPARED nw... CAR1ERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 9EET AAE.' SAM"
BoOUE RANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1 RENOURISHMENT PLAN - SHEET 23 of 37 25
Al AML NAVO M PT1 Q�
PREPARED
or MOPPATY A Hellol DAM wAYMNt --_--- ------- '
Figure 4-4: Reach 3 and 4 Typical Plan View
10
G71
�WW
J h
r
I
i.
I Ww.�l ..—rMr—...�-Ww—...—HIM—...—Mlw
•.TYNw�...—�w....—.M��....�.IMIM�c;..�yHw—...__rw�...—Www...—I�Iw—•
�L PRopo"DNIIW
—INIw—...�}Wy
V7
V7
V ----------1--
-------•---------_
I
W—...—NLw—...—�aw�...�..—�w—...—nw—...—mow
--
PIIDf08®NR
_mow_..._ _...—�w_..._Hw—...—_...i2
<g
s r
I
'x -,. 3 a539C
r xfAM wxW -- -. .�xLpMI PlxfJ.
I �vt 0.CFCN I
�;�'Ctt"n9so.
�ddM ra^sw veal
Ixs
I
vxsT�AS=� ru�li+ xsn9c
�
eamh r o'. Nexr xs Nw9T3 x3391
lI
i � Mv3T '<6 x69CC rVC
-I
ENBFm mw EKWPAS wa
t
fr
_ egwy a+sa
_
MnNo Ww
N
N
-
F
PRAECT nAE' CARTERET COUNTY. PREPARED nw... CAR1ERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 9EET AAE.' SAM"
BoOUE RANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1 RENOURISHMENT PLAN - SHEET 23 of 37 25
Al AML NAVO M PT1 Q�
PREPARED
or MOPPATY A Hellol DAM wAYMNt --_--- ------- '
Figure 4-4: Reach 3 and 4 Typical Plan View
10
G71
�WW
J h
r
I
Vl
I Ww.�l ..—rMr—...�-Ww—...—HIM—...—Mlw
•.TYNw�...—�w....—.M��....�.IMIM�c;..�yHw—...__rw�...—Www...—I�Iw—•
�L PRopo"DNIIW
—INIw—...�}Wy
V7
V7
V ----------1--
-------•---------_
W—...—NLw—...—�aw�...�..—�w—...—nw—...—mow
--
PIIDf08®NR
_mow_..._ _...—�w_..._Hw—...—_...i2
z-- _ —
1
_– _ �naras®rRw
------
... ' 1eaUF1% EM8Lom UW
I
I
ATUM10G4W" I
PRAECT nAE' CARTERET COUNTY. PREPARED nw... CAR1ERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA 9EET AAE.' SAM"
BoOUE RANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1 RENOURISHMENT PLAN - SHEET 23 of 37 25
Al AML NAVO M PT1 Q�
PREPARED
or MOPPATY A Hellol DAM wAYMNt --_--- ------- '
Figure 4-4: Reach 3 and 4 Typical Plan View
10

cn
m
n
q
0
z
O
m
0
m
m
0
I
I
1 �
1 !
I i
^ I 1
X.
r X )ti •�f , <� ,,� r` " k� � •� ,,fir n �c'�r'� ' � ' ; f r ` f ) ,l
MOPMM.ADCITY M."
11ARIK)RODIVIDsc fl
ice•—MOREtmADcmr
' r ^� !` y�, � .� HARBOR NAV[OAMN
x �'� . f".+.. .'� . �c �. ! ! CHANNEL
!
u' BORROW AREA
DREDGE DOWN TO-5014AVD 88 i r
(52 NAYD Be WITH 7 OVERBURDEN) I
4 I ! !
PROPOSED BORROW AREA LEGEND NOTES
1 IXMMUMNMICIA81.1i "A PROPOSED BORROW AREA CONTROL POINT ). BATHYMETRICAL CONTOURS SHOWN BASED ON
m
INT NORTHING EASnNq 7011 VISRACORE LOCATION MULTIBEAM SURVEYS PEWORNIED BY
o�T (SEE ATTACHMENT 1 FOR DATASUMNARI) OEODYNAMIC9IN 70)8.
2. BORROW AREA COORDINATES ARE NC STATE
PLANE, NAD 7083 (FEET).
a
FRarcr mm CARTERET COUNTY, PAEPARFD vp¢, CAR. ERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA SWIFT AIRF.' SWIFT
NKS
BOOUE BAMASTER BEACH
40
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1 BORROW AREA SITE PLAN
~AAIIDB» NOFFATta NCNOL DAM MAYM7� 't— .a -----.- P. 81
MOF
PO
A
336281.00
2880873.17
B
.
336218 38
28D%981.70
C
331134.28
2867367.83
D
330742.17
28D7024.01
E
330752A7
28M59.35
Figure 4-5: Borrow Area Site Plan
11

Tj
Cf)
m
0
i
0
Z
0
m
m
00
SECTION A -A
.. ..... ... . .. ...... ... .. .. ... ...... .. ... .... .......... ....
-7'7%71�7
0 /OW WDC 0000 4M am mm IM am 1000 10000
DISTANCE WEST TO EAST (FEET)
SECTION B -B
0-
. . . ....
.......
..
41--
0
...........
.
.....
I= 2m 3m
... ............ ......
4600 sm WW 7000 em
DISTANCE WEST TO EAST (FEET)
SECTION C -C
i�
.0
W
N07E
TYPICAL EXCAVATION DEPTH VIA HOPPER DREDGE
WILL BE 2-3 FEET PER PASS (INOOWPLETE CUTS).
PR"Cr nXE- CARTERET COUNTY. PREPARED fa?.- CAR. ERE, COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA swr par, swrr
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BRAD
NOU=PLAN.PROJ HECT1 41
BORROW AREA TYPICAL SECTIONS W
DA RAW f&V0 U OM DATE, MAYMII
AQAPANWNI' MOFFAIT A MOMOL 81
Figure 4-6: Borrow Area Typical Cross Sections
12
0
........ ....................... .........................
...........
.
.....
...............................
... ..
.....
. . . .....
.... ..
... .. ..... ..... ... ... ... .. .. . ....... .... .. .. ......
..... . .. .....
... .. ..........
0
10000
low am am 400D WW WW 7000
am sm
DISTANCE WEST TO EAST (FEET)
N07E
TYPICAL EXCAVATION DEPTH VIA HOPPER DREDGE
WILL BE 2-3 FEET PER PASS (INOOWPLETE CUTS).
PR"Cr nXE- CARTERET COUNTY. PREPARED fa?.- CAR. ERE, COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA swr par, swrr
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BRAD
NOU=PLAN.PROJ HECT1 41
BORROW AREA TYPICAL SECTIONS W
DA RAW f&V0 U OM DATE, MAYMII
AQAPANWNI' MOFFAIT A MOMOL 81
Figure 4-6: Borrow Area Typical Cross Sections
12

5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION
A Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) was prepared in accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended [42 United States Code (USC) 4321-
43471, to address the environmental effects of proposed shore protection activities on the barrier
island of Bogue Banks in Carteret County, North Carolina. The Wilmington District, United States
Army Corps of Engineers is evaluating a request from Carteret County (Applicant) for Department
of the Army authorization pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the
Rivers and Harbors Act to implement a comprehensive, long-term beach and inlet management
plan for the protection of 25 miles of shoreline on Bogue Banks. Concurrently, the Bureau of
Ocean Energy and Management is evaluating a request from the Applicant for authorization
pursuant to the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (OCSLA) [43 (USC) 1337(k)(2)] to use outer
continental shelf sand resources as a component of the proposed action. A Coastal Area
Management Act (LAMA) Major permit application was submitted 7 June 2018 to the NC
Division of Coastal Management.
6.0 MASTER BEACH NOURISHMENT PLAN STATUS
The Bogue Banks Master Beach Nourishment Plan — Project #I is the first project to be performed
under the 50 -Year Master Beach Nourishment Plan and is estimated to use 1,519,030 cy of the
22.6 Mcy allotted for background erosion. As discussed in the Final Master Beach Nourishment
Plan (2014), the proposed nourishment volumes approximate the need for background erosion only
and will be used for overall long-term planning and budgeting purposes (Table 6-1, Figures 6-1
and 6-2). It is expected that named storm losses will be handled separately through FEMA
reimbursement projects. Reference should be made to Table 1-3 in the Final Master Beach
Nourishment Plan for the initial volume needs and cycle of nourishment events.
RECEIVED
'tr+?o 13
MP SECTION WIRD

Table 6-1: Renourishment Intervals and Preliminary Projects Based on
Management Reach Approaches*
Year
Management Reach
Nourishment
Volume (cy)
Proposed
Nourishment
Project (Yr)
2019
686,067
3
2022
1,839,351
6
2025
967,920
9
2028
1,839,351
6
2031
686,067
3
2034
2,121,204
6,9
2037
686,067
3
2040
1,839,351
6
2043
967,920
9
2046
1,839,351
6
2049
686,067
3
2052
2,121,204
6,9
2055
686,067
3
2058
1,839,351
6
2061
967,920
9
2064
1,839,351
6
*Reference Table 1-3 in the 2014 Bogue Banks MBNP for projected volume needs and
nourishment cycles of the managed reaches.
RECEIVED
JUN 15 M8 14
MP SECTION WIRO

0 0.5 1
v% ----------- --- --- ------ ,---
r segue Emerald Isle Emerald Isle Emerald Isle i Indian B#achl Atlantic
Pine Knoll
Inlet West Central i East I Salter Path Beach
Ocean i
�5 1 y
NIINgNMM,�x N�MNC�l N'NNNIt'"N NNt1,,ft 1l�NNON to xl ]x"1]1]xllf'11 Fort
l-
Mo.. I C ,.�• t
Yawww �]NYMn �'-- tMBCOR y
aayasaa+aak; t
' �] fw•a�w.es..Y•sww
BOyuf,°fq �f f..r-w.Y aw�]N +PftwM
Inlet
aas! MBNP Project Ml
Bogue Banks Beach Nourishment Projects
2018- 2068
M
MFigure 6-1: History of Bogue Banks Master Beach Nourishment Plan Projects
M
0
15

M
M
0
M
M
0
CARTERET COUNTY
A 1232
ti
14
gn -*-
6-0.
post
er esald to
CV
MAU c
Nil shores
37 5 Atlantic Beach
-� Bechl k59-76) (77-102)
%nd'011 pathSaIxaf
ONSLOW BAY
Legend -1
4----* Year 3 Nourishment
Year 6 Nourishment
Year 9 Nourishment
0 0.5 1 2 3
Miles
Figure 6-2: Overlay of MBNP — Project #1 with Proposed Future Nourishment Intervals
16
4
r 137.461
20
nr
'Iter 58
.
36)
X9112`
\dlate
Sea
Vtesch
Isle
raid
ramTra e Gts 35-4 1-0
"2,61 ev
3.0 Miles 66
,472,5440V
ONSLOW BAY
Legend -1
4----* Year 3 Nourishment
Year 6 Nourishment
Year 9 Nourishment
0 0.5 1 2 3
Miles
Figure 6-2: Overlay of MBNP — Project #1 with Proposed Future Nourishment Intervals
16
4
in 3
Vtoa
indinn schl
V�ores
pine Knoll 5 76
59-
'Iter 58
.
gran sects
4.6 '6ilas,
Ira nsects
1.0 kiss
711,489 r -V
166,716 cV
ONSLOW BAY
Legend -1
4----* Year 3 Nourishment
Year 6 Nourishment
Year 9 Nourishment
0 0.5 1 2 3
Miles
Figure 6-2: Overlay of MBNP — Project #1 with Proposed Future Nourishment Intervals
16

APPENDIX B
PLAN & CROSS SECTION VIEW
1. Typical Plan View — 50 Year Project
2. Typical Cross Section View — 50 Year Project
3. Permit Drawings — BBMBNP Project #1
RECEIVED
"UN 07'018
pcM WILMINGTON, NO

1. Typical Plan View — 50 Year Project

2. Typical Cross Section View — 50
Year Project

30
25
9C
15
0 10
z
5
w
c
0
ca
ai 0
w
-5
-10
-15
-20
-200
-100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
Distance Along Profile Seaward of Survey Origin (feet)
-----BB006 REP June 11 BB006 CUT
BB006 Avg Fill: 50 cy/ft BB006 Max Fill: 75 cy/ft
1000 1100 1200 1300 1400
BB006 Min Fill: 25 cy/ft
First Row Of Structures
J i
-100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
Distance Along Profile Seaward of Survey Origin (feet)
-----BB006 REP June 11 BB006 CUT
BB006 Avg Fill: 50 cy/ft BB006 Max Fill: 75 cy/ft
1000 1100 1200 1300 1400
BB006 Min Fill: 25 cy/ft
First Row Of Structures

30
25
20
15
00
0000 10
0
Z
ami 5
c
0
m
0
W
-5
-10
-15
-20
-200 -100
0 100 200
----- 1313011 REP June 11
1313011 Avg Fill: 50 cy/ft
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400
Distance Along Profile Seaward of Survey Origin (feet)
136011 CUT 136011 Min Fill: 25 cy/ft
1313011 Max Fill: 75 cy/ft First Row Of Structures

30
25
20
15
-5
-10
-15
-20
-200 -100
0 100 200
----- BB017 REP June 11
BB017 Avg Fill: 50 cy/ft
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400
Distance Along Profile Seaward of Survey Origin (feet)
BB017 CUT BB017 Min Fill: 25 cy/ft
BB017 Max Fill: 75 cy/ft First Row Of Structures
-r
0 100 200
----- BB017 REP June 11
BB017 Avg Fill: 50 cy/ft
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400
Distance Along Profile Seaward of Survey Origin (feet)
BB017 CUT BB017 Min Fill: 25 cy/ft
BB017 Max Fill: 75 cy/ft First Row Of Structures

30
25
20
15
-5
-10
-15
-20
-200 -10
0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400
Distance Along Profile Seaward of Survey Origin (feet)
-----BB025 REP June 11 BB025 CUT BB025 Min Fill: 25 cy/ft
BB025 Avg Fill: 50 cy/ft BB025 Max Fill: 75 cy/ft First Row Of Structures

30
25
r�
15
-5
-10
-15
-20
-200
-100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
Distance Along Profile Seaward of Survey Origin (feet;
----- BB030 REP June 11
BB030 Avg Fill: 50 cy/ft
BB030 CUT
BB030 Max Fill: 75 cy/ft
t
b ,
{
-100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
Distance Along Profile Seaward of Survey Origin (feet;
----- BB030 REP June 11
BB030 Avg Fill: 50 cy/ft
BB030 CUT
BB030 Max Fill: 75 cy/ft

30
25
20
15
000 10
0
Q
Z
C) 5
c
0
0
w
-10
-15
-20
i
�
L
i
�
I
!00 -100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400
Distance Along Profile Seaward of Survey Origin (feet)
----- BB035 REP June 11 BB035 CUT BB035 Min Fill: 25 cy/ft
BB035 Avg Fill: 50 cy/ft BB035 Max Fill: 75 cy/ft First Row Of Structures

30
25
20
15
0 10
Q
Z
5
c
0
m
0
W
-20
-200 -100
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400
Distance Along Profile Seaward of Survey Origin (feet)
----- BB042 REP June 11 BB042 CUT BB042 Min Fill: 25 cy/ft
BB042 Avg Fill: 50 cy/ft BB042 Max Fill: 75 cy/ft First Row Of Structures
i
i
i
�
I
�\�
ail
\
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400
Distance Along Profile Seaward of Survey Origin (feet)
----- BB042 REP June 11 BB042 CUT BB042 Min Fill: 25 cy/ft
BB042 Avg Fill: 50 cy/ft BB042 Max Fill: 75 cy/ft First Row Of Structures

25
20
15
0 10
a
z
w 5
c
0
m
T 0
W
-5
-10
-15
-20
-200 -100
0 100 200
--- BB046 REP June 11
BB046 Avg Fill: 50 cy/ft
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400
Distance Along Profile Seaward of Survey Origin (feet)
BB046 CUT BB046 Min Fill: 25 cy/ft
BB046 Max Fill: 75 cy/ft First Row Of Structures
_l

30
25
20
15
-5
-10
-15
-20
-200 -100
0 100 200
----- BB050 REP June 11
BB050 Avg Fill: 50 cy/ft
300 400 500 600 700 800 900
Distance Along Profile Seaward of Survey Origin (feet)
BB050 CUT
BB050 Max Fill: 75 cy/ft
1000 1100 1200 1300 1400
BB050 Min Fill: 25 cy/ft
First Row Of Structures
i
I
0 100 200
----- BB050 REP June 11
BB050 Avg Fill: 50 cy/ft
300 400 500 600 700 800 900
Distance Along Profile Seaward of Survey Origin (feet)
BB050 CUT
BB050 Max Fill: 75 cy/ft
1000 1100 1200 1300 1400
BB050 Min Fill: 25 cy/ft
First Row Of Structures

30
25
20
15
-5
-10
-15
-20
-200 -100
C
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400
Distance Along Profile Seaward of Survey Origin (feet)
----- BB058 REP June 11 BB058 CUT 136058 Mm Fill: 25 cy/ft
BB058 Avg Fill: 50 cy/ft BB058 Max Fill: 75 cy/ft First Row Of Structures
1

30
25
20
15
0 10
a
z
W 5
w
c
0
ca
0
W
-5
-10
-15
-20
-200 -100
0 100 200
----- BB065 REP June 11
BB065 Avg Fill: 50 cy/ft
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400
Distance Along Profile Seaward of Survey Origin (feet)
BB065 CUT BB065 Min Fill: 25 cy/ft
BB065 Max Fill: 75 cy/ft First Row Of Structures
i5
i
i
i
i
1
`+ `
0 100 200
----- BB065 REP June 11
BB065 Avg Fill: 50 cy/ft
300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400
Distance Along Profile Seaward of Survey Origin (feet)
BB065 CUT BB065 Min Fill: 25 cy/ft
BB065 Max Fill: 75 cy/ft First Row Of Structures

30
25
20
15
0 10
z
Y
5
c
0
v 0
w
-5
-10
-15
-20
-200
-100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
Distance Along Profile Seaward of Survey Origin (feet)
----- BB070 REP June 11
- - BB070 Avg Fill: 50 cy/ft
BB070 CUT
BB070 Max Fill: 75 cy/ft
1000 1100 1200 1300 1400
BB070 Min Fill: 25 cy/ft
First Row Of Structures
►
►
i
►
►
►
►
`
- --
1
%
-100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
Distance Along Profile Seaward of Survey Origin (feet)
----- BB070 REP June 11
- - BB070 Avg Fill: 50 cy/ft
BB070 CUT
BB070 Max Fill: 75 cy/ft
1000 1100 1200 1300 1400
BB070 Min Fill: 25 cy/ft
First Row Of Structures

30
25
20
15
-5
-10
-15
-20
-200
-100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
Distance Along Profile Seaward of Survey Origin (feet)
----- BB075 REP June 11
BB075 Avg Fill: 50 cy/ft
BB075 CUT
BB075 Max Fill: 75 cy/ft
1000 1100 1200 1300 1400
BB075 Min Fill: 25 cy/ft
First Row Of Structures
�
A
i
\
\
\
{
FI
-100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
Distance Along Profile Seaward of Survey Origin (feet)
----- BB075 REP June 11
BB075 Avg Fill: 50 cy/ft
BB075 CUT
BB075 Max Fill: 75 cy/ft
1000 1100 1200 1300 1400
BB075 Min Fill: 25 cy/ft
First Row Of Structures

30
25
20
15
-5
-10
-15
-20
-200
-100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 10(
Distance Along Profile Seaward of Survey Origin (feet)
----- BB079 REP June 11
BB079 Avg Fill: 50 cy/ft
BB079 CUT
BB079 Max Fill: 75 cy/ft
►
►
►
►
►
►
►
►
-100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 10(
Distance Along Profile Seaward of Survey Origin (feet)
----- BB079 REP June 11
BB079 Avg Fill: 50 cy/ft
BB079 CUT
BB079 Max Fill: 75 cy/ft

30
25
20
15
0 10
z
ami 5
c
0
ca
ami 0
W
-5
-10
-15
-20
-200 -100
0 100 200
-----BB085 REP June 11
BB085 Avg Fill: 50 cy/ft
300 400 500 600 700 800 900
Distance Along Profile Seaward of Survey Origin (feet)
BB085 CUT
BB085 Max Fill: 75 cy/ft
1000 1100 1200 1300 1400
66085 Min Fill: 25 cy/ft
First Row Of Structures
Y
1
�
11
/1•
N.
\
--
0 100 200
-----BB085 REP June 11
BB085 Avg Fill: 50 cy/ft
300 400 500 600 700 800 900
Distance Along Profile Seaward of Survey Origin (feet)
BB085 CUT
BB085 Max Fill: 75 cy/ft
1000 1100 1200 1300 1400
66085 Min Fill: 25 cy/ft
First Row Of Structures

30
25
20
15
0 10
Z
Q) 5
c
0
m
v 0
u,
-5
-10
15
-20
-200
-100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Distance Along Profile Seaward of Survey
----- BB100 REP June 11
BB100 Avg Fill: 50 cy/ft
BB100 CUT
BB100 Max Fill: 75 cy/f
�.
n
%%.
-100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700
Distance Along Profile Seaward of Survey
----- BB100 REP June 11
BB100 Avg Fill: 50 cy/ft
BB100 CUT
BB100 Max Fill: 75 cy/f

3. Permit Drawings — BBMBNP
Project #1

PENDER
S
r
1
7
tiC
ER OW'E
i
>
Q
i
--4 CAPE
FEAR
1
Z
Y
Z
i
OJ
SCAPE
`GO HATTERAS
ti �ATTERAS
CQ� INLET
.,ICO
OCRACOKE
INLET
�P
C+�
�N
P
4
5-7 RT
INLET CAPE
LOOKOUT
PROJECT AREA
P
ti
P
0 10 20
5 15 25
SCALE IN MILES
VICINITY MAP
PROJECT TITLE.- CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DATUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY.• MOFFATT & NICHOL
64.
6ME�LD ISLE.
9!;IBOGUE
INLET
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE.- MAY 2018
CRAVEN d / I \�
CARTERET
MOREHEAD
CITY
rsr�
J
---- INC 1182 /
B OGLE SOUND
NC ATLANTIC
rco\
4
PINE KNOLL BEACH
roar
ISLI
AN,)
U LO
R P'\ SHORES
1f 4C0\'
1
SpLTt BEACH MOREHEAD
INDIAN =
II BEAUFORT
II INLET
1
SHgC 1
CITY HARBOR
11
ODMDS
F ZD
11 MOREHEAD
�FcoRO
�
?sem 9h
II CITY HARBOR
10— 6� y p
NAVIGATION
CHANNEL
c
F m o I
9`J},
J
2 Y ODMDS FINES
CAPE
o w DISPOSAL AREA
�a
q
LOOKOUT
PROPOSED
BORROW SITE,
PROPOSED
SEE SHEET 40
RENOURISHMENT,
SEE KEY MAPS ON
SHEET 2
ATLANTIC OC
EAN
LOCATION MAP
0 2 4
1 3 5
SCALE IN MILES
SHEET TITLE.- SHEET
VICINITY AND LOCATION MAP 1
RECEIVED OF
61
DCM WILMINGTON, NC

n v L, L e a u L N u
W ~ ~ W W W W W W W W W W W W W f Lu w Lu Lu ~
1 W W ¢W W QW W W W W W W W W W W W W QW W W W WLu Lu
w
cc cr~ H 1= F H F H F F f ¢ H F f V- F Q F F F W �✓
Y N w N N N N N N N N N N N N N V, N N N N N N N y
O H S 2 2 S IS- f F f S S S O 0
1 N N N�) N r W m b b O W N
ISLAND BOGUE - _ --
_ SALTER PATH
- _ J - — -- IN'
BEACH Q
��Ir' �.; HI �I�.„i'.',.Isil_�J� -�'' EMERALDDRIVE'
� �,�L ��� L 1 L1�Ju �'« W
r--—��_ r r r� - Q �^ �l I I
- T � l m �, ,�� L I � T �rrl� �� u� �
r �. -r - �I� +� -? ', I; ' r `', ;�.' � _11�L0_CEAN DRIVE Lam' 11�� J�.1- �LJ�J. 1._y _: I � ;^? J
14 _ _ 5 _ _I_. _.� 6 _ -7 _� r S ��.,. 9-- - 10'
- a
36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 as 45 46 47 4a 49
PROPOSED EMERALD ISLE EAST BEACH RENOURISHMENT LIMITS PROPOSED INDIAN
A T L A N T I C O C E A N BEACH RENOURISHMENT
EMERALD ISLE EAST AND INDIAN BEACH KEY MAP LIMITS
w B O GU E S O UN D
-'�� SALTER PATH / �wT,r
Q'-------_-- I I \� "�-r-`'f� INDIAN BEACHN O3,/�
LLI - - - i� / _yrv- - - - -. j �� T� SALTER PATH ROAD m
i
--
r �� (CORAL SHORES �� - z
r
LJI
v16 — - 1 — — 18 19 20 ��' ��I_ I_I_ _ 21-I�' I-� - 22-�' — - 23 — �I 124' 'I -I - _ 25- -'�II _ 26- i
— -
-- v
� - a
50 61 92
PROPOSED INDIAN PROPOSED INDIAN BEACH 69 PROPOSED PINE KNOLL SHORES BEACH RENOURISHMENT LIMIT61 62 63 S
I
BEACH RENOURISHMENT BEACH RENOURISHMENT LIMITS
LIMITS ATLANTIC OCEAN
INDIAN BEACH KEY MAP INDIAN BEACH AND PINE KNOLL SHORES KEY MAP
m � ��ARBO �o� r¢ 1 F
2 _ RVITAE DRIVE\ O' - r C¢' �' Awl ~
El�
AM
_Tl PLACE P Ir E K'.� OLL SHORES DO_ GWOOp CIRCLE I L� J_ �P ^TSL � ' i r�
Lu 28 29 30� ''' --- 31- r== L— $2 •33_'--- 34 PINEWOODDR - JKNo« pR;-_ r=�
-- - - 35 _I J. _-1_ ® —_
z - _
I I
'3
9
V
I I I
I
I
66 86 67 69 89 7071 I
72 I I
a 73
74
gPROPOSED PINE KNOLL SHORES BEACH RENOURIS WENT LIMITS 76
ATLANTI C OCEAN 0 1/8 1/4
PINE KNOLL SHORES KEY MAP SCALE IN MILES ,
PRO✓ECT TITLE- CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY- MOFFATT & NICHOL
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE.' MAY 2018
SHEET TITLE.
KEY MAPS
SHEET
2
OF
61

4--
_ - ---- Q�
B� EVVA'E P EMERSON HE CK NC
PSS` EM.::q_0.. S V• N _ �X ASSaC Ati _ _ „A R CK IOC
a
c-� .qN�,r .. -� -
-� ._
_ _ z I
SAA, � � � � I � i � .� - .. _-- -- _
ANTHONY J
I
DURAN-, o r7q� z „? a
iMARK E ESA e 'R REVER.�
7
z
DISALVO o
u z
z
I /
'ER, FON'= __C ..IN'E EAS'`
7 ES
_ C i— -
_ CL
C w Q
Tom' ------------------ ---- --- ------------- --
I
I uuRANT, �� - - L -�--
T W
i
� MARK E ETAS �`� _
S ALJ c- - -- - - __ - - - - - -- --
-. - -- - -,- - � �+� O:tv= F--� A -S-» � k� NNa+ R;s A�-4 ��- - -�.'. ���'o C-M•� �F-!J'A¢- �- -- -` 'W^
- ----�- --- - y. - H-F�--!-; A�--+sb.E ASC�A TES_ - li - - ----- -- --- ---- --- -- --- - ---- -- ----- _ OWN_RS ASS.. - --- --- -- V
-
c ----- ---T -- — W
z — — — — — — — — — — — W/�
V/
-- - --- - - s-- - -------- --- - EXISTING MHWJ',_ _ -- - --------V_- -ti w— --- - - —_ —
- -- - - - - - - r -- MrW M W
—'r_ t J
EXISTING MTL � -- -- .— -�-- —__ - Z
Fc-- — - - - — --- -- - _ _-- - ------ - ---
_ _ _ -- - - -- - - --- - - '• PROPOSED MHW
- -- --- EXISTING MLW ( MHW ---MHW V
- - - - - - - - - -. `✓ -- - - _',ti` -- -- rJ',_ vv - M '�a — -- - e -- -- r` _ _ _ _ 's__ d, - f ,J - M ROP@SEEI-A11Tt w
t-
PROPOSED MLW
MLW �—
... MLW --• MLW a
MLW —... MLW i
- - - - - - -- - - - -- - - - - -- -- - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- - - -- - - RENOURISHMENT SLOPE LIMIT -- - - - - -
- - - - - - ATLANTIC OCEAN I
PR0✓ECT TITLE.- CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DATUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY.' MOFFATT & NICHOL
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE.' MAY 2018
SHEET TITLE.-
RENOURISHMENT PLAN - SHEET 1 OF 37
0 100' 200'
1 "=100'
SHEET
3
F61OF -
61

z a - --
.—R�Rci
J0-1DAN, DOROTHY ATNX
- -- ----- cc ----
- - - KAT., %
-- - - ------ -
�I - - - - - Er !� - - - -�� o � - - � - �+- WALTER D S�NGLER, MOORE,
I � I .`'"' E`Uk ANGELA Cn A�.G ETUk - - ALAN S ETUX - - - --'- -
��
ARRICK INC OCEAN REEF OCEAN REEF OCEAN REEF OCEAN REEF w �, ROLLOC'N, CAROLINA - --
CAROLINA �11JG1�1FJ; E NEE ___ _ _ __
- - DEVELOPMFti n. EVEL"F � DEVE_CRM�N' + z C._.FTOV M.- CrA�AL.- ---i-COi?SiAr -�� WC�'AM �� rC P -- - - - -- - - - - - -�- - - -
- -i EVE OPM - I- - -3- N -------------- j LO
-
- �� z c-ROrFR_'c� ROFERT_ LEVE 0 -MENTA
u:
— — _ BERM, EL +6.0 EXISTING MTL
�`4 +- — -- — — — -- — _EX�STING MHW
WLd
---- ------ --- ---- — -------th'Vv— tHa—
_ _ __ — T —
vv
— -----------�J - — - EXISTING W ---- -- -- rJ
W — — — — — -- --- - --- — --+� W
I
MHW— —MHW -•—MHW ..._MHW MHW J
I
+MHW—MHW—N.._iMIM
MHW MHW—nt_�--PROPOSED MHW ---------- ------ PROPOSED MTL MLWMLW— MLW ML—MLWMLW ••- MLW •-• MLW ...MLWMLW MLW ..PROPOSED MLW-- -- _—-_ �-- �4� .— — — — —. .-- -- -- -- — -- — -- -- — — — -- — I
RENOURISHMENT SLOPE LIMIT
i
— ----- ATLANTIC OCEAN ---- j---= ---_---
N
V
w --NW- ---- _---__------_-__-_- -_---_-__--__-- _- -
2
O Z U)
EL
PR0✓ECT TITLE CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY- MOFFATT & NICHOL
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE: MAY 2018
SHEET TITLE-•
RENOURISHMENT PLAN - SHEET 2 of 37
0 100' 200'
"=) 00'
SHEET
4
OF
61

6
i
- 0('L;1A\ 1)RI��E
7-7
Y—I l ALMOST - —
WEBER, HEAVEN -
POTTS, GARDN ER, MAYER, 3P CE, CUMMINGS I MIDDLE ON. EMERALD ISE I �� DAVID W JR
CAMP y! DM TRUST C E`ux K
_ CHARLES i KENNETH M 10riN M ETA_ BPI,' E ET[_X WHITE, WILL'�AM R HR -A B E JX LLC If LEE,
CATHERINE LSC J EDWARD RICHARD F ETUX ELIZ SHOW=..i , SOLLENBERGER, DAVID E
G6A.�r -- ETJX ETALTUX MARIAN VA -FR MAR' C BEZAK, MICHELLE /�,
_ ADAM L NICHOLAS B 1 ETAL
COA
—M C _
77
----- -- — ——
W W
W _ ---
uj
(n EXISTING MHW EXISTING -
- - - - - -BERN( EL�_0- - - - - - - - -
EXISTING MTL � -- - - -- --
_ G MLW s,--N�,'�� C%i
wJHN— -- _------------------- -- --- -------------- -_---------.-
uj
M�-N M�-� M��' IA - -M--W—Mi-"4b'— M�-'W-P.��:W t,tF-N �LIJ
uj
I— --- — — — ---- ---------- --- — — ------ — —
<— =-r� �� - - hT�r = ���- _= r<�✓~ - ?� ��"_ _ �r �w - - I7�.. _-�•- -- �v� ��— —_ e� � i�-- � MH W � MH W� _ w - Is � w LLI
-
Lt.l MHW MHW w MHW MHW —... - n id M�W�-- M M L -t t� - Mme- .J,, h' M W z
Z I MHW —MHW MHW
J PROPOSED MHW Z
J
2,----------------------------------------------------- -- _
U - - — PROPOSED MTL o - - V
N --
_ _ 1
MLW —•• MLW MLW MLW MLW — MLW LW MLW — MLW MLW — — ML
Q � MLW MLW --.. MLW � --- -- .� _
— —_ —_ � � � _- � PROPOSED MLW _—_ —_ - --
__ - - - - -- - - - - � - RENOURISHMENT SLOPE LIMIT
I I
I I
cl-
H w
U I w ATLANTIC OCEAN w w I w
zZ
I
Nw
cc w -- F- U I
PROJECT TITLE: CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY.- MOFFATT & NICHOL
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE.- MAY 2018
SHEET TI TLE.-
RENOURISHMENT PLAN - SHEET 3 of 37
0 loo' zoo'
1 "=100'
SHEET
5
OF
61

b
L
—' - -- - -- _ - --r - -- _ - —
— — — —77- — - _-- — _ M,NES. _ - ''A�_�.__ A✓ NEP _ .CCDS Dc ASST K,
WAERNC'ON, N „JRh,
'EP RH - — _ EE`WARCS, PAS "-CARR= N — LLF _ _ _ R 'B'Y S EiA� f V,'�-AF. RAY �A Sp�q}`
+ -- ;� BEN — �-�- ETUX BEVE vO�N�,� C�E_L CHCSY,—
DAN EL E �WILU AN/TR
_ r
e
PETER J HEAVENER, KEv-f— } — — — �! E A _DUBO 5� — — — — - — — -- L n7L E — - - — — — —
ETA= EVANKC DANIEL E TITUS, _ GOLDA TRUSTEE
WCJNO, G GAG ARD'. - BAKLEI, y — +- — — FRu4 7€ 11� —
�T�X MICHEL'-, C7 �A171-- 14 - ['fl 'CARL`
CHRL,." .HER MARK A E-A_ - -- -- 3QBERT N — _ _ _R'�
ETA. ECAARD D Fv ETUX RJTF V�- _ � -
U-) �-- '— -- --- -- _ — — — -- — 1 1
— --- --- — —
----- ---- — — — —— -- _------- — ��
W -- --- --- 11.)
Lv ---- —-------U--uj
BERM;EL�6------- EXISTfiVGMHW --- ----- - _----------------------------- - -
ui ------------ _ ---- -
r - - - - - - EXISTING MTL (n
-- Mn VV —MHN -- - - - - -.
Lv — - LLI
LLI
Ld
_EXISTING
-- — _-- __
I I _
UliNi VLA -� VI -6
MHW MHW MHW MHW MHW T'MHW— MHW MHWw MHW •- MHW--.. MHW—•- —
Z
MHW--- MHW • IWJI PROPOSED MHW aMHW
0 J
~ I----------------------------------� PROPOSED MTL ------ o -----------------------------_ _ � _ ---� �
Q MLW MLW MLW MLW MLW MLW MLW MLW MLW MLW — MLW MLW MLW Q
RENOURISHMENT SLOPE LIMIT PROPOSED MLW
I I
I
I ATLANTIC OCEAN C-1,
u ---_
- - _ W w - - —_ --- --_
Z
cn
s �
PROJECT TITLE.- CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY.- MOFFATT & NICHOL
PREPARED FOR. CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE.- MAY 2018
SHEET TITLE.-
RENOURISHMENT PLAN - SHEET 4 of 37
0 too' 200
SHEET
6
OF
61

0
--F
v
P i�
7- D- �3—
X ca
/,A,- '�CVE
V, v 4 T
v E vvs A ASE_ 4v -
V A THV WS
L DFTI�N tS- C
J�-VVL- j
D-4
. . ... =NhZ-u -- - CAK',NF A O'D S —AK 7-7
-OL 77L r -y
A THOMAS REN --AL ETUX E7AL I
�,, �4
—ce lco
ERM, EL 4:6.'0 EXISTING MTL
—EXTSTl-NdMHW
W
U7
LLI =7: LLI
Ld EXISTING MLW
L—'A, LLI
U) V A U)
L IN —.---MHW-----MHW-----MHW—
MHW-----MHW-----MHW----- HW---.—MHW-----MHW-----MHW
Ld MHW-----MHW---- IVIHW--'�� I — — — Lu -- --- --- — --
- — --- -- — -- -(�v — — ---- — — — -- -- -- — -- -- — — — — --- -- ___--------
Z
- --- -- --- ---- -- -- -- — Ld
z PROP'CSeD-MHW- -- -- 9 ----------------------------------- — -- — -- — --- z
---69 - — — — - 4 1
BERM, EL
H
_W
-----------------
0
r PROPOSED MTL IVILW IVILW—MLW —MLW MLW
C) W--.--MLW-----MLW—
IVILW MLW — MLW M C)
IVILW MLW — IVILW — "' --7 1 --
PROPOSED MLW
RENOURISHMENT SLOPE LIMIT
0)
cr) ATLANTIC OCEAN
ui
W W
(n m:
Z rj)
< ui
a: Lu
F- En
PP0,1ECT TITLE CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM.- NAVID 88 (FT)
PREPARED B)- MOFFATT & NICHOL
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE: MAY 2018
SHEET TITLE
-
RENOURISHMENT PLAN - SHEET 5 of 37
0 100' 200'
1 "=100'
SHEET
7
Of -
61

_ ---� - - --------------- - --
��� — `WI SFR ------- ----
RANCKO WiAK., _
_ X _ WAV
_i�0 -'��3 _ —` ��RNARD a .� MrR,� N h- JX J�J�`= rt- C �. SAS
~0V—SD� '�' —V� —'+ _ —_ _ _K _-C- '�4— — Y'� -- `?; A^V,..\ -A. —
AhR _ A - - -�_Av __ - _ AN__ 4VA --- _-
BARBARA i—'�—� dJ,f�D"
,1ME� DUNK. v�iORA
-------�, [ �--i - DANT — ��
ETJ
r -_NX_�
— — -- -- -- -- — -- — --- — —
-- ---------- - - 7BERAf,-E-+s.o------ ----------------- 0)
— — — — — — .— — — — — -- EXISTING MTL — —
------- -- --- — EXISTING MHW----- —
W— --- — _-- --- --.---—
-- 7MH
N— Jf f -- -- -- EXISTING MLW_ __ _W — — — — — t r — —f NML'✓' MLW L'N—__ -- fA _...— — - — — — —;f_W — �MHW —MHW MHW— --MHW w —__ e dMHW W •• MHW — MHW ... MHW -" MHW MHW o MHW -----�PROPOSED MHW �------------- ow - — - PROPOSED MTL a Li
MLW MLW LWMLW —MLW MLWMLW Z
Z_MLW —.— _ - — -- -- -
MLW MLW M W /
PROPOSED MLW RENOURISHMENT SLOPE LIMIT
f------
-- -- — -- -- -- -- --- — — -- -- — — — — — — — — -- -- ATLANTIC OCEAN I
wW-�--_--- -- -�- wW
Z z fA
cn
—. -- -- -- - - --- --- ---- -- --- -- --� I W
F
PRO✓ECT T1TLE- CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY." MOFFATT & NICHOL
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE.- MAY 2018
SHEET TITLE.-
RENOURISHMENT PLAN - SHEET 6 of 37
0 too' zoo'
1 "=100'
SHEET
8
OF
61

c
�I AMB' S
STEPHEN P ARTi — — — — — -+—
___ .- M N, — —_ —
F —
x ^M: M1A, � a „CR _ C RK�NS. S-IU�a�ix ��EVPE. GOCH_NO�R. _ ---
IF ONS Sw. R' n `� — -- PC,sr?" 'v .-_c -.,.,.�..qS A X ,V R'J,
E DX �JSt "JA1� E X �Pl3li, N— — - - `C STr V_N�K HARR S. _EE. I -� �--
_ - JAS..
- -- - 14- - EUEN M� /: - BRAENDA t1 A, ESA BILL v !; �K AN�-- KING OF TFE - - - rn�s1�E HA RIs,
—i Ar �� — "� x _
.�_C-QBa NK- � - _ - � nv✓�C�-
--
- E x E A -
- 4 ---I3ERMfL-i76-.T - EXISTING MHW
L ------- ------------ -_- -_-- -- --_ --- --IJ-W —
u — N. F '�; — J — — . -- O
EXISTING MTL _ - — - -- --- --- - — - —
W I —----------- -- ---- W
— — -- ---- — -
-
V / — - — — — — — -- — -- FIHW . — I�RW —� MHW — MHW
EXISTING MLW
uj
Lw
I ----- --- --- — _
W - – : �- -- -- w V)
W pip
PROPOSED MHW O r -- -------------- -- -
-------------- ------ =__- = --__-___ =_ �____�------------------------_� W
--- - -
— _ �-N"MTL
I--- MLW MLW MLW ••-N MLW—•-•—ML —•- MLW--• —MLW-----MLW I
W LW ••- MLW -•- MLW ••- MLW ... MLW , :--_
PROPOSED MLW I W
\7
U RENOURISHMENT SLOPE LIMIT =
I Q
— — -- --- — -- -- -- - - --- — — —
I ATLANTIC OCEAN
vLO
I U w
w W I
cn =
Q w
CC
PRO✓ECT TITLE- CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY.• MOFFATT & NICHOL
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE: MAY 2018
SHEET T/TLE.•
RENOURISHMENT PLAN - SHEET 7 of 37
0 too' zoo'
1 "=100'
SHEET
9
F61Of -
61

0
C, D4— P, I _ L I PS,
ci� 77 �,CHM I T-1 777 1 MAAS.SI NICK [TAL
DAZEIVOPE, ELGFNE A
— JC)INS,2N, I — 1 j0 -N B ETLX MAAS,
KtN,�T,. TIC—
CIARLES W
VAS F C C -AR
_x C'Erv— WEND" L qFpT,AV A —S W
-77
tivs� — — — — — —
z 'X
—_ __
-A
______ A%i-A
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
___-- a
—C4 4- E -RM -,EL-+"
E- XA S110 T FNIG W WW -- — EXISTING MTL
MHVV
cr)
EXISTING MLW uj
UJI ---ILLI
:r ---� --i7� �A-' -v —Lw
t" v, V V�
w
W
MHW ...—MHW-----MHW--s�� —MHW---- 4HW RW
--PROPOSED MHW- Ld
uj uj
U)
PROPOSED MTL
� LW MLW :MLW MLW MLW MLW VILW MLW MLW MLW ML V MLW MLW MLW
Ld U-1
PROPOSED MLW
Z
RENOURISHMENT SLOPE LIM
r IT—
ATLANTIC OCEAN
cf)
PR0,1ECT 7-ITLE.- CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY.- MOFFATT& NICHOL
L)
W W
Z (n
< w
Er w
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE: MAY 2018
SHEET TITLE-
RENOURISHMENT PLAN - SHEET 8 of 37
0
1"=100'
SHEET
10
OF
61

z — — -- C — — — -L— r— — — `IOKES
R
— —•--rtAf?Rt� — --- �..ARDSON, _
_ F L`�+c A�� ASNIN Si -C€t\}N-.-'�WOIVMS--
' -AS--
TTS — — — — — — --V-
L-LS, -I, -f C+ JF.'Ji H_.NRI. TTA �_ — ETUX ETAL i WEBS I - SIAL E;AI Ev -- QRS FIVE g MICF'AEL N
z --- �ANK_, KL'MAR, IN JF -'MEh v
BRUCE PAP KIRK S ��x ZJ -RTI _ _CAFE C — ——S6S�SiK— — — — —�I, t — — w — — — Y < D; B;1A
I x 7A A'_ —T _ <
c K 4 :G� cq9-i,p,'.-- < z
_ r
i
G-GSSO4
-
I W�
--- --€jtlSTtNG-MHW- --- �4� ---- -- ----- --------
_ BERM, -EL �6.U-
-- N HV EXISTING ---L
ING MT
------------------- ------ -- -- -- -- -- --- --
----------------------------------------------------------- — I
W ----------- EXISTING MLW ---------Jw
(%� --- r,1 Vv' VL_ - - —
MHW MHW MHW MHW •• M W -- MHW MHW -- MHW -• MHW -----MHW--�V:,7—MHW--- —--MkIdL —MHW MHW
W PROPOSED MHW - a
— ------ — —----------
V7 -_—
----------- 0 - V)
I ROPQSED MTL o I
-- -- N
LW------ MLW •• MLW -- MLW •• MLW MLW MLW •- MLW-- -MLW _ ••• MLW •- MLW -• MLW •••—MLW— MLW
uj
Z I PROPOSED MLW - — --_ j Z
RENOURISHMENT SLOPE LIMIT
I I�
a ATLANTIC OCEAN
Uw
W w
I cn
N
w
PRO✓ECT TITLE CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY.- MOFFATT & NICHOL
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DATE: MAY 2018
SHEET TI TLE.-
RENOURISHMENT PLAN - SHEET 9 of 37
0 100' 200'
SHEET
11
OF
61

w
_z
UJ
Y
z
-4-- — — — — — — — — — -- — — — — — -"- — — -- — — — — - — -- — — — — I
I — --- f �F�---
-� —~ ANIF�B JRA w I
[SAV16 — t— t F'i�r7xft*J-' fi �`-- �18t3A:- E# X #ER&OA � [ZAN 1 PAUL L FT _ AMARES ;�.= I CLARK,
�F_ — L.� _ a - L�R�A E_ix SJSAN ,� �'E�'Y'� —t AMAR M I FARREN, AS-. -a RICH
'-+- — --h�_ — - =3c+X - -ti- '- T — !-='� — — ,— C.� OLS: _ «--- — — — --- — i-� - F I'� � O V C H , L � ANDREW R vi
-,-� - — -
z �c z tit '-- ` �- sI&o zt -�- ; -.S — — �-T�: r R;.Y.c _.1 ,� SLC'.�� '�A .c F ti', F - a: = c K I
x
zti — — — a v R E'UX MARC =T"X S -SAN � � �CA — < — — — — KF .-EX� �, C.
SHIRLEY gQ— —zg-
35 Y —� >_ �
-- -- --- -- -- --- —
1=0 4-
-- -- - - — -- - -- -- — —
F- - - - - - - - -- --------------- - - - - ---------------- - -- ---- --------------
I-- ------4�- - - --- ----- - I
- -- - - - - - - - - -
EXISTING MHW
- - - - --- - -- -
--- ----
- �, W - Mhw �M n-- IJuw JNw---1,4u -. Myw M vd I��w .. Mew f—N -—__t,�Nw Y'w
I­_
-� EXISTING MTL - - -
- ----------------------
- --- - - --- - -- ----- - -
- — -- -- W
I ---------- - ----- -_
(%I EXISTING MLW --- --- ------------- - ---- -- _
LLI MklW - -MHW �IH�i'v = ---#I W-4�--TrTFIR =AIFhAL _ MHW MHW MHW— MHW HW—••--MHW--- MHW - �yJ
_ JLij MLW -- \- t✓ - W w _ _ - - _
cli
PROPOSED MHW _ -, � a _ _ - - - LLI
JA/— ------- ----------- -= �:4ti�— M,N— O MIN' ��-�---
PROPOSED MTL MLW -_
0
LijW MLW --. MLW—••• LW MLW MLW .-. MLW—•- -
ML -- MLW --. MLW --. MLW ---- MLW ••-- MLW---••— MLW --- I Lli
Z PROPOSED MLW Z
_- —_— _-- ---_ _ ----------------_
01-
F_ RENOURISHMENT SLOPE LIMIT V
<I �~
' I v ATLANTIC OCEAN v I v
PRO✓ECT TITLE: CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DATUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY- MOFFATT & NICHOL
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DATE: MAY 2018
SHEET TITLE:
RENOURISHMENT PLAN - SHEET 10 of 37
0 too' zoo'
t"=too'
IN
SHEET
12
OF
61
W
w
U
w
C)
ww
Lu
I
2
(n
=
I
O
cn
w
¢
I-
W
I
W_
E
__
I
<
-- --
PRO✓ECT TITLE: CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DATUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY- MOFFATT & NICHOL
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DATE: MAY 2018
SHEET TITLE:
RENOURISHMENT PLAN - SHEET 10 of 37
0 too' zoo'
t"=too'
IN
SHEET
12
OF
61

N
i----
--
- ------
- _,-
.--------
-------1----�
-------------�
�ti ORRIS,
-
-
'_CG
A MAXNE_'�,
GRABARE,
_ SObL�K.
- y , ..' OkiN
u SE YMO�R
} a
ELIZABETH
p� Ra�F+a--F_-
S L'L
�.
H' K
LARRY G
W --SO".
-
_ _
, .JB_ -
��_ 0"'EA�.�
LLC —
—
,— —..
WIL'AM J
— `�
DAVID ARCr'JE
NARY LTA,
^�
FUSE
OCEAN DRIVE Oh.N
UX
-� E7AL HEGE
L X
i— R�CF-ARC S
MARY
�•,�,� -
-77
?JpER
XORR.c
2 C E'A
cA' EARG
x �o
r 3'— -- — —
—
—
'4'�ZT
— -
— — —z }�
—/— c—
<
--� —
-- — —
—''tfi
Sr-
_"��k
rGERS'!>.
EZ-
—
w I
--------------
- -- -- — — —
— — — — ——
-- —
BERM Et �60— 4 — —
�—
- -
—
- --- — —
EXISTING MTL
— — — — — — — —
—
— — — -- — — —
EXISTING
MHW
Ja,
_
'
tJHW'
MHW —}JAW - —NHW'
..MrW—
WMHW-- M'
uj F"77,
Irn
EXISTING MLW I LI-)
MHW ... MHW MHWMHW MHW
- MHW MHW—...—MHW—...—MHW— •• - Ml�p
Lij
PROPOSED MHW O--------------------------------------�Lv
J
PROPOSED MTLV'
MLW MLW ... MLW -.. MLW -----MLW MLW N•— MLW ...— MLW --- MLW MLW —MLW —•..—MLW — —MLW
LLJ
Z rLW — — �
.J T ----------_--- — PROPOSED MLW -- — ----I J
_ J RENOURISHMENT SLOPE LIMIT ( _
U U
I ATLANTIC OCEAN
v � I
vw
w
Q wcn
-- —� —
PROJECT F17LE CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM.- NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY- MOFFATf & NICHOL
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE.- MAY 2018
SHEET TI TLE.-
RENOURISHMENT PLAN - SHEET 11 of 37
SHEET
13
OF
61

z
L-- --- ---- ___________
�soN. �_ — �R�--v,��Ah�� BEA- CA v���RoaN -- ���� A� aEAc- � Nc �iE� '— -- —
�— A ffAtE A �� — - y� - -1 -- 7NI.JE-- �� CJARK, N�A''OCKS, �_L C
Z � -- — — — — _ _ JOHNNY
'TJX ANDREW R — �L3TE5 _
_ -- -- -- — — — — — BOHEF�
_ '- — — — — — -- --
1-- - -- -- — —I i ----
REI ICiOUS FXEMP"'ON a
------------ M - h% MHVv M 11 =— Pf�'h .�MR , L+6.00_—f�� —----------------------�
—EXISTWG UHw
-_ -- --
- N� — — — — —
EXISTING MTL — — — —
EXISTING MLW �
_ HW --MHW -- #H — —---------------
W MHW - --- MH — ti =.w; —1vIHW --
- — — — — M'-�MHV�► —' ,A— MHW— = M!-�,- —— �s_�� - W rw--�YttH— W
W MHW s..h MH PRCPOSI��IvIHWHW _ — --- --- -- — M _
_ _ __ W
--------------- -�,------------------,(n
W-----� - - - -- -
!!--------------------- PKP-QSEDUTL— _ — —�C� — — — — — — — — -- — — — — — — -
- — — — — — — — MLW-• MLW MLW —... MLW — — MLW:-- 1aL�1Y= —MLW L1J
(n --- - - - -- ----- --- ---- ---
-MLW — — — — — _ Ui
I — ... ••. — — — — —MLw
MLW �� --
LW _ MLW— MLW Ih. MLW -.. `=4�r-- — — — — --
PROPOSED MLW — 1
Z RENOURISHMENT SLOPE LIMIT Z
_-- ---------- ---- -- ----- ----' 4 ---- ------ J
I I =
U �
H I IQ
Q
----------------
I co — I
I W
I— -- — --, _
'�
CC w
I I
PR0✓ECT TITLE.- CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY.• MOFFATT & NICHOL
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE.- MAY 2018
SHEET TITLE.-
RENOURISHMENT PLAN - SHEET 12 of 37
o 100' 200'
t"=too'
SHEET
14
F61Of -
61

I
-1 —-- 1— — — — --- --- 2c—�— —--- --- --
I —` -- — --- -�-- — ---------------_---- --- ----,------------- --
SHOPING- ! —'— -� -1 �' JOh�S,A_Pb L�.S JR FRED N
- -_ --
7- Lc -LC - — — ——V00RHEES _ ASN,K�NNE'F1 �R rvSO R C��AR[ LEE' IAVL0R,JIZTAh P EJJ L � �� 5- -�� — — � Og g �SD� -
---7IT-OE^ CIC ET k �4Y ���� - I— — —
E rt�OLS- — — -—K-LEZY LLC T — — — — - - - - ? RODER' L II OWE[ A ETUX�
��t AN r'ENF"r E �
- - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - EXISTINGMHW- - - - - - -- - -" - -- - - - - - - - - SRM;EL+6A - - - - -- - - - -- - --- - - - -- - - - - - - - - - -
V t7W . �Vr- - - � VP w(i?W- - M lh' -- -- PJ F -1h' -- JAW' — M N -- MFW
{L� MSN— ` t
I -- EXISTING MTL — -
--- -- ICO
EXISTING MLW - - — - --
ti W . t ll�-- W M --1JfH W - M H W - • • MH W _ _ UHW- - • - •--•-MHW MH Nf �-
W ----
�� Jv
W a PROPOSED MHW O TW
J_______—__—________—__—_ —___________—__--77
__ 2
----------- �f bSEDMTL N --- ----- ----- -_ --
Lij
IyJ LW_ MLW MLW M _ _- -
W W MLW — MLW MLW MLW MLW MLW LW — — MLW — — MLW W
1U)
I PROPOSED MLW RENOURISHMENT SLOPE LIMIT
W) ---- - - - - - -- - - W
Z -- -- --- -----1z
U
�I
v I ATLANTIC OCEAN
U W
W W
z U)
W
PRO✓ECT TITLE- CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY- MOFFATT & NICHOL
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DATE.- MAY 2018
SHEET TI TLE.
RENOURISHMENT PLAN - SHEET 13 of 37
0 100' 200
1 "=100'
SHEET
15
OF
61

I— — — _ EXISTING MLW — — —
— — — — — — �_ — - —=__ R _
... — — W _ RF J
W MHW ... MHW Mew• �. MHW MHW ...—MHW HWS-��__ _- MHW-----•• -` MHW-^�--•-• MH ----MHW—... MHW—...—MHW---• MHW •I�
W`�, - PROPOSED MHW w
PROPOSED MTL - - - - - - U)
w L1SL — — — MLW MLW -- MLW MLW •• MLW MLW---- MLW - MLW_ _#L1N - MLW ••--MLW-----MLW -- (yJ
Lli
I- PROPOSED MLW U)
w - - - - - - 7RENOURISHM ENT SLOPE LIMIT w
I I
0 I V
U W
W W
1Ir
T_uj
PROJECT TITLE.- CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DATUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY.- MOFFATT & NICHOL
ATLANTIC OCEAN
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE: MAY 2018
SHEET TITLE:
RENOURISHMENT PLAN - SHEET 14 of 37
0 100' zoo'
1 "=100'
SHEET
16
OF
61
— —� THE OCEAN, CLL,B MASTER ASSOC
—OCEAN
C JB CONDO OWNERS ASSOC—
-4t FIC-+ -�iC E4Ad S�. it -C-- ! &[,_F{� i PABitr'-L
_
- -. - .- _.-
__ - - - - -
-- - - - - _- -__ _ -.-
- - -_ _- -'"
-__ -_ - -•tel __ - - -
- - ---------- -------- - --
-------------
EXISTING MHW
BERM, EL +6.0
---
EXISTING
---MTL --_-----------------
I— — — _ EXISTING MLW — — —
— — — — — — �_ — - —=__ R _
... — — W _ RF J
W MHW ... MHW Mew• �. MHW MHW ...—MHW HWS-��__ _- MHW-----•• -` MHW-^�--•-• MH ----MHW—... MHW—...—MHW---• MHW •I�
W`�, - PROPOSED MHW w
PROPOSED MTL - - - - - - U)
w L1SL — — — MLW MLW -- MLW MLW •• MLW MLW---- MLW - MLW_ _#L1N - MLW ••--MLW-----MLW -- (yJ
Lli
I- PROPOSED MLW U)
w - - - - - - 7RENOURISHM ENT SLOPE LIMIT w
I I
0 I V
U W
W W
1Ir
T_uj
PROJECT TITLE.- CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DATUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY.- MOFFATT & NICHOL
ATLANTIC OCEAN
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE: MAY 2018
SHEET TITLE:
RENOURISHMENT PLAN - SHEET 14 of 37
0 100' zoo'
1 "=100'
SHEET
16
OF
61

�
�
-
�
�
�
o
EXISTING MHW
"rvv vv
PW -
10
�-
PROPOSED MHW
uj
----*^*-���
uj
| UV)
JAJ muw---------wuw--------'mUw---------mUw----- -----wuW--~�-IVII.W---------muw---- w ---------wLw---------
U)/ \-PROPOSED Mum | _-==,'�'�_- --- - -- -- -- �mm
___ ____ __l _-- __- --- _�- __---- ___ | V)
-- -- - -�
---------U A
SLOPE LIMIT ' " '
-�� -_ _U��
~�
^� | - - - --------- - ------ �� |'
/ u� -------------- �
� -- --1 -- -- -- -- -- -- __ | - -�
| --- --- --- _-_ |
| ---|
U | | |
|
ATLANTIC OCEAN |
| |
\ �|�
^ / LO
En
I
|--- U
/ | U
|
| A
' o
fROJEC7T17l^� CARTERETC00NTY,
BOG0EBANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN ' PROJECT 1
DA TUM: mAVomm(FT)
PREPARED B Y- mopFATT&m|C*OL
PREPARED FOR: CARTERETCO0NTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE: MAY 2018
SHEET TITLE.-
RENOURISHMENT PLAN - SHEET 15 of 37

-- --_ - - ------ - - - - -- __ ----- - - --
--------- - - -
--- 1 --
II ---- — - IN Ar, —AC_s ON — -- -- -- -- — — — ------------------- ------------ ------------- -- ----
I
BERM, EL +6.0
EXISTING MHW
------------------------------------- -
---
(tv-VJ— ��nV1-- MNV'- I✓ V�' ✓r W' 'r,AN— Q W-
E
MSW- ✓HVv --- �V' 4 N' --M V'- -M!�,W --
EXISTING MTL
-- — — - — --- —1ut11
MHWLli --------------------
�- I PROPOSED MHW o EXISTING MLWLij
-- - - — - - --- y - - _ - J _ - - - -- - __ -.
-- --_ —MLW - - - -- -- - - - - - - - -- -�
__PROPOSED MTL MLW MLW MLW .. d'��1� -- ✓-.1�� -- ��e f� N_✓r -- ��L v,
� SE MLW —
LL) MLW MLW --
W �— — RENOURISHMENT SLOPE LIMIT
(n PROPOSED MLW
— -- — uj
ATLANTIC OCEAN -- --- -__ ,-_ - -
PRO✓ECT TITLE CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY- MOFFATT & NICHOL
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE.- MAY 2018
SHEET TITLE.•
RENOURISHMENT PLAN - SHEET 16 of 37
0 too' 200'
1 "=100'
SHEET
18
F61Of -
61

I
HOFFBE RO_�_�� �
�_— -
I
CN
WEDNaa E_ ZLvK' — — — _ — — — — — —� — —� Ld
uj
'.;X
r
uj
uj
Mr�N—_B-ERI — — — - - — — —
EXISTING MHW r _ EL +�9
ndiE4'c-- �riF1�-�--fJHiA� U)
EXISTING MTL
jz- - ---- - -
-------�,-_— ------ EXISTING MLW I=
�MHW�
MHW-- — — - MHW_ MHW-----MHW-----MHW H - - --
�'--- -- -- — -- -- — — — —MH�W,,�s v' 1N� MHW HW-----MHW---- ^, �✓ ti MHW
N�`W.". __--_-_ J __-- --
MLW PROPOSED MHW
cc
MLW"N PROPOSED MTL
MLW
MLW ...—m W-----MLW-----MLW-----MLW— ..—MLW---- -- MLW... MLW ...—MLW ...—MLW ••- MLW-7
PROPOSED MLW J
------ -----
— - -- — RENOURISHMENT SLOPE LIMIT
-- ---------------------------- -
- ATLANTIC OCEAN
PRO✓ECT TITLE.• CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY- MOFFATT & NICHOL
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE MAY 2018
SHEET TITLE.-
RENOURISHMENT PLAN - SHEET 17 of 37
0 100' 200'
1"=100'
IN
SHEET
19
OF
61

6
I
W EY'A-5ERT DEMEE, dEAS Ems. EA E" _ _ =� 'CK.. t{-
— — -- — -- -- ,'4 — JR ETCX ~ HAROLD B117 ORZ`� G GEORGE G E "x JUDi - iTT_.V',CTOR.A D j 3R;V� ., <
�- SEA RIDE�9LYET_ - ETAL,IUpY -� ETUX SH',REY E_'X SHIP EY - - - - - v, r
500,E DEVN- 0�M•Eti-
c - — -- — r -� AE'NERS�� — -�-
Wh JJARG ��'�_S ., CW'��RS ASS-
uj - -- - - - - - - - - -uj
W E --X LINDA - -- — ----� -- - ------ -- --- — - Lv
- ----- - - -- _-_ iU,
--
uj EXISTING MHW ____---------
-BERM EL +6 : 0 LL.I
1,ht4'-. .
,
--IJP"--—Lij
fJ.A—.. -.f—. �VJ
EXISTING MTL - - -- --
Ltl -- -- EXISTING MLW "bi
-
_ _ - -- -
-_ --- -- N _. F Y — - Z
-- �— �''SIF —"
I MHW MH HW-----MHW—... MHW MHW •- M W MHW MHW MHW -.. M W ...—MHW —MHW— —MHW U
~ �yw
- --
- - PROPOSED MHW O _—__—__—
PROPOSED MTL
MLW MLW--MLW-----MLW--,-T- MLW-----MLW---MLW MLW :� AILW� - -.. MLW MLW - ML -MLW - MLW
PROPOSED Ml W
I `I
RENOURISHMENT SLOPE LIMIT
I- - - - - - - - - - - ATLANTIC OCEAN -
I WW
(nr W
A —
Z
f -
F -'
N
(n I
PRO✓ECT TITLE CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY- MOFFATT & NICHOL
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE.- MAY 2018
SHEET TI TLE.•
RENOURISHMENT PLAN - SHEET 18 of 37
0 too' 200'
1 "=100'
t§
SHEET
20
OF
61

0
— — — _ — --� — — - - —
—
_ —t--iR E'—_— �pf'_ TA'J A N'� _R 3LJ N
T��— Zr' E� _'CL^ e` _ Gi1uLORa-� - A E—' cX— - —�
vv— 474fa'C-- ��A �- _ -- — — — — 3�'�.
-E--'lJ'�A -iR-n 7_ — -- — — -- — — _— —z— --1–-
- A� — LA'F
"7-,-
r' t _ — — _ — — E — — —
—czpK — — y"Yk — — — --- -- — -- _
— � - >�
W W
W W
EXISTING MHW
U7 BERM, +6.0 EXISTING MTL U7
W - VH w 1✓ �'w - L -- ✓ �' _ tf h V — M V I✓ N -- -- M W . -- M F N — . p Ni —_ -- ✓ Ji — -- ^/ — t✓' 'J — — — — — —
' W
— -- - -- - — — - - — - --- E U)
-- --- ---- — -EX--- -- — -- -- — -- — ---- -- --
EXISTING MLW
- .._ H
W -'r✓ -- t� �w M �w - -- v� ��v -- i�-w -- r✓�w — — -- - W
Z �
z —...—MHW Z
— — — — — — — — — — — #4HW — �4iW— -- MHW MH MHW— MHW —MHW— —M _
=�M W MHW--.-- -- --------W -- — ------------------- --
PROPOSED MHW p
~ --------------------------------------------------------------- - --_ —
PROPOSED MTLcli MLW —1
MLW MLW —... MLW — MLW MLW MLW — MLW —... MLW MLW — MLW MLW MLW — MLn —.
PROPOSED MLW ,I I
RENOURISHMENT SLOPE LIMIT 1
Ln LO
~ W
ATLANTIC OCEAN w W
PRO✓ECT TITLE- CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY.• MOFFATT & NICHOL
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE.- MAY 2018
SHEET TITLE.•
RENOURISHMENT PLAN - SHEET 19 of 37
o ioo' zoo'
1'=1 oo'
AN
SHEET
21
OF
61

0
---__ =-2 -- ----- _ _ __-- f -- -- - -
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — O=CG.�ti C � SL`N S.SuC_e :'Q -1i: — -- — _ -- — — — — — — — .�_ - —
_
--
—T — AUL=�
N
LL.I EXISTING IVITL
Ll.l EXISTING MHW BERM, EL +6.0
- — -- - - - - -- - - --' (? -- "tTt'
_ _
Ui-- ---- -- --- — --- ----�� ro MLW W
w`h' --- - EXISTING--- -- ----- - Iuj
- - _V_- _-, — 'T MHW MHW MHW —MFW— wIHY�k
MHW MHW N ...—MHW—...—MHW- --- --
Z MHW MHW .- M;W-
MLW—"'—M
... MHW—... MHW o ----- W
J - - — -PROPOSED MHW MLW
_ _ _--------- LW MLW —MLW—.-.
=�___ ------ - O--
-- _---- --- - -� m —MLW --MLW M
-�oPos�a-M� -
-L -- - - - -mLVt LW —...�-
�- Q
IPROPOSED MLW
I- - - - - - -- .-- - - _- - -- -- - - - RENODRMffMENT SLOPE LIMIT-
- _1
0)�-
ATLANTIC OCEAN e - U W I
Lu
cn
PROJECT TITLE. CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DATUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPAREDBY- MOFFATT & NICHOL
PREPARED FDR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE: MAY 2018
SHEET TITLE.
RENOURISHMENT PLAN - SHEET 20 of 37
0 100' 200'
1"=100'
SHEET
22
OF
61

cj
I � I
I
I x s I
Z
.-1---�--
---LTL �
_-i
-BRTN = ALT -r---� - 30�.
- - - - - - --- - - - - - 12 - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - GAR" - BONNIE G -�- �-- �.h_-BAR-F*H M-,`_-�N- AZT -z
-O- -
- - .-- �-E A==RPY�'\-�R M.., E'AEL} �- -� •:G�_ -. SER R' _x SARA - -
_ - R!_N'_Y Ml, F, 1SCO�L� C.DCE -- - -�- - - - - +Ej- - - - - - - - - -
------
- ——
--— — — — — ——
XIS
F------------- -- ---- - ETING MHW _ _ - - -- ----
W_-- .—
—_
W
W —Mw - -- — W
_ EXISTING MTL — — - ----- - -- — ----- -- - --- - - _
U7-- --- --- _ -- - - - - -- - --- - — - - -- - _ -- - - - - - - ---
(W I-- EXISTING MLW W ---- ------ - ------------- -- ------
_ �dHYY - - - -MHVIL t� MHW _MHW •• MHW MHW MHW MHW —M W—...—MH
W MHW
W
prHv�--=--------—————— —
— ---- U)
--!Tp,r��-- _ ��! � N -- -- ti", � Vv -- -- I✓ _ �� !�1'` N: h/' PROPOSE$ Ib1kIVYl —_ -- MLW �.. -
-------- ----------
w ---------- - PROPOSED MTL N LW ML✓ —MLW M �..
M'
Z MLW MLW— MLW .. MLW ._�dLV1L= _ ---- T-% —
_ M �W
MLW - MLW---- Z
J ._. MLW �'- � � _� —
= PROPOSED MLW I =
(� L RENOURISHMENT SLOPE LIMIT (�
�-
CO
I ATLANTIC OCEAN - -- - -- -- - �O `O I
U W
C
I U� W
I
_ Z
I--- --10 _ ¢ w I
PROJECT TITLE.- CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY.- MOFFATT & NICHOL
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE.- MAY 2018
SHEET TITLE.•
RENOURISHMENT PLAN - SHEET 21 of 37
0 100' 200'
1 "=100'
SHEET
23
OF
61

0 OCEAN GROVE WFS-
OWNERS ASSOC'
LANE, BJ>CONS REACH BEACON'S RLACh'
- - - 16, -T -7 (h z
AF �4 �AT 7— 1 -D
�Lt' ELL +,�Nlt 7�:—I— V45T,F, ASSOC
y F
-AC+ T7 -F7 v� c-, 1, r, VAST�F ASSO,
TJX XAK
— — — — — --- — — — — — — -- — — —
— -----'I----i--+----
T— — — BERM, EI -46.0
j— EXISTING M�w I I — —
--j
ul)
04
EXISTING MTL
Ljj
Li
EXISTING
-r EXISTING MLW
l==wH
V) -..—---
--- MHW-w
Lj MHW—... —MHW-----MHW ... —MHW—... —MHW —MHW—... —MHW MHH
MHW—
w w
—POEOSEDUHW VL
V 4
U) - — -- — -- — -- —
PROPOSED MTL
[=MLW —... —MLW —... —MLW ...—MLW-----MLW .—MLW---- MLW—L-- MLW -----MLW --LMLW —... —MLW -L-- MLW-----MLW-----MLW---.— Ld
z
PROPOSED MLW
RENOURISHMENT SLOPE LIMIT — -----
=_5
LO
F-
LLJ Lu
z En
ATLANTIC OCEAN <
a:
cn
PROLIECT TITLE- CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED B K MOFFATT& NICHOL
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE.- MAY 2018
SHEET T17LE.-
RENOURISHMENT PLAN - SHEET 22 of 37
0 100' 200'
1 "=100'
SHEET
24
OF
61

�
b
/ n
! ' /
|
P K ASSOC BEACONS RLACH R A (5- HACONS REAcI-d BEACONS REACH
VASTER hSSOC' VAST
W S O� --Q4 �Nl G`RO�E HOMEOWNERS FR ASSOC Z' WEST ;KS ASSOC INC
C DI
uj :24, T ui
K� 7V)
PROPOSED MTL
---mL*t----wUw----���----wUw----���----wuw---- �----
04
UJ | �^= mLw-------'m ----WUw---------�Uw--------'wUw--------- --ULJ
z � --� -- -- -- __ __ __ __ __ | \_ ���m� ��� _ _ _ _ _ — — — — — Uz
v .—nswoun/aH MsmrSLOPE LIMIT | U
| ___----------------- �----------------------------
K-- -- !
" | �
�________________________________c�-------------------------------------�---�
| U
k---- --- ------ --- --- --- --- ---- --- --- --- --- --�
|' |
| �� �
' ^
"
ATLANTIC OCEAN � � v
+|m
| / U
PROJECT TITLE- CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN ' PROJECT 1
DA TUM: mA*oaa(FT)
PREPARED BY- mOprATT&m|C*OL
PREPARED FOR: CARTERGTCO0NTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE.- MAY 2018
SHEET T17LE.-
RENOURISHMENT PLAN - SHEET 23 of 37

�
o
�_--__________� ---------------�---------------�--5�--- ----� 7
� ----------r-------------------�-------- -�----� ~~ ____� /
EXISTING MTL EXISTING MLW
L0 r-
04
7:7-
V)
uj
Lu
Ljj PROPOSED MH
--
PROPOSED MTL
�------ m wuw wUw wuw m mUw wuw ----muw----
�j�--wuw---- �'----mUw----���---' �w ----�' ---- ---- ----' ---- ---' ---��'---- ----���--- ----'�' ----��"---- LLI
| `—Pnopoasomuw | ' z--
/ `. | /
| 7o�oPsu�� /
--------'
[------------------------------------��— ----------------- U
� -- -- __ __ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- l
--- --- l
ATLANTIC OCEAN LOLu
A
Lu
cn |
Lu /
�|m
�cn
RRDLIECrn�� CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
/���m"oea(FT)
PREPARED BY- moprATT&m|C*OL
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE.- MAY 2018
SHEET TITLE-
RENOURISHMENT PLAN - SHEET 24 of 37

I i
— — — — — — — -- — — -- — — — — — —' — -- — — r— — — — — — — 4 — — —i — — — — — — — — — — — — —_—_ —_— — — — _ _
k — — — — _ _ \ _ — _ — --
- _
i
I— — — — } — — — — — — — — — — — — —
T
_ / OS
`�
GARY DX—
R VAK,. BE_'_, PERKY
CVER Oh,i ARDO CRISP, MOTAPARTHY
BEACONS REACH � HARRIS — �ID1D, %L -s � � 1 r � �D, BOC
M�AS� ,4S� _ _ HENRY .� c� ETJX WILLIAM JR .;OuR dAh
— �OS'EPH M HOMFR SON C I. SELLERS L PROPERTIES ADDiDONT SH -ILA F DAVID
I ILTUx KATHRYN. JOVONNA H 111.���_ DARD TRAP LLC I DURANT I J
�.— L J� —� :�,o.Uia D 7-! V I V SS C AR G In A �S11R —ET
'
—r L— DAVID B BRE G,
BERM, EL +6.0 — — — — — — — — __ -EXQSTING ATL— — — — EXIS-DING 1111 — -- — — — — 00
51 V111 PI m H, vv- _. — .. — Mew VFW-- _ — _ _
M d N —
--------- -- — -- — — �W
------- -------------------
W `_-- — M'`'f -- — — — — _
— — -- — — — -- — — EXISTING — — — — \ M
s W — - — NLLij
'M1' — M -W �ti .— C=%i
—
Lil MHW -• MHW •- MHW -• MHW -- MHW ---W MHW -- MHW MHW • —MHW •- MHW -• MHW MHW •••—MHW MHW -- LLJ
''uj _ - PROPOSED MHW - I LLQ
V/
I I o �PROPOSEDMTL-------- --- — V'
N I
F
MLW MLW MLW MLW MLW MLW MLW MLW MLW MLW _ AALaNMLW — MLWLd
w--- - — - _ — — I
Z ----------- ——�RGPOSEDMLNV Z
�RENOURISHM NT P I E SLOPE LIMIT 0
Q I I~
r i
i
r-- --- — ATLANTIC OCEAN I
PROJECT TITLE: CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY MOFFATT & NICHOL
\ v `m -
IL _
\ u IWwW
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE.• MAY 2018
SHEET TITLE:
RENOURISHMENT PLAN - SHEET 25 of 37
0 100' 200
1"=loo'
SHEET
27
OF
61

z
O
0)
- MHW— MHW— —MHW MHW —MHW -------------------- --------------------
--------------
_ LLEXISTING MLW IJ IJ W
---- ----
MLW— MLW M W'— - -- -_ -----
—17
p — PJ, L W -- W--- 7 f M L'Vd
MHw MHW MHW •• MHW MHW MHW MHW MHW MHW MHW MHW •• MHW---•—MHW—•••—MHW -- (!)
LIJ OaLu PROPOSED MHW W
wLli
V)I ---_ --_ ��— -- — _4 -- —_----------------eJn ---------------------------------------�:%i
o PROPOSED MTL
—MLW MLW MLW MLW MLW MLW •• MLW MLW MLW MLW MLW MLW MLW — — MLW
Zi -- _�-___ ----�Z
PROPOSED MLW
RENOURISHMENT SLOPE LIMIT
-------------
---------------
°�
---------
- - -- - - - - - - -- - - -t — — — -- -- — — — — — — — — — -- 4=e
' _
U w ATLANTIC OCEAN
IZ U)Q W
I �
Z
PR0✓ECT TITLE CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM.- NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY.- MOFFATT & NICHOL
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE.• MAY 2018
SHEET TI TLE
RENOURISHMENT PLAN - SHEET 26 of 37
o ioo' zoo
i"=goo'
SHEET
28
F61OF -
61
- - - - - - - - - -
--____
I
t
L -------------
- ---
-I ---
-
-
_--�
- - - - - - - -- --- ----
-
�-------------
-----
T ---_ _-!
-�
---
-- --- - --r
a--
_---�Ef
-�- - ---
r
-----------
-----�
-- i
ILI�F
MCCANN,
I
-
--- — -- �—
12
— — — —
a
�
Q
o
-
S
BARNETT REAL BRIAN C
PR6f�TIESINC A—ETUXrtfAC��—�ONa�R-
KOPELMAN,
SER �— JOM S,
HnST _MUR�,Ol�6A
'^
RIVFS, —
iO
THOMAS JEFFERSON H
-��' w B & D
EXUM, AW — ILEAC rC
WAL'_ACE
BRENDA S
ET,iX ,NDA A
I A -ICE
a��---
JOE ALAN �,
a TCNA=
—
—
hAPR�S,
--------
-- —
--�-----
----:--J--
---r----
----tom;-----�----
-
— — — t
---- - -- - --
�
-
— —
— --- --
4
- � � — --- — — -- --
---- --
_ ------
�
�
BER EL +6.0
--I
I
-- ' -- --
------''--- -
- - - - - --_
—
' � - - - - _
�, W-�H'Jv'
_
--- - -
- - �-
- _-
MHW...—MH
_...
W --MHW-- MHW'I
MHW
M'rW
0)
- MHW— MHW— —MHW MHW —MHW -------------------- --------------------
--------------
_ LLEXISTING MLW IJ IJ W
---- ----
MLW— MLW M W'— - -- -_ -----
—17
p — PJ, L W -- W--- 7 f M L'Vd
MHw MHW MHW •• MHW MHW MHW MHW MHW MHW MHW MHW •• MHW---•—MHW—•••—MHW -- (!)
LIJ OaLu PROPOSED MHW W
wLli
V)I ---_ --_ ��— -- — _4 -- —_----------------eJn ---------------------------------------�:%i
o PROPOSED MTL
—MLW MLW MLW MLW MLW MLW •• MLW MLW MLW MLW MLW MLW MLW — — MLW
Zi -- _�-___ ----�Z
PROPOSED MLW
RENOURISHMENT SLOPE LIMIT
-------------
---------------
°�
---------
- - -- - - - - - - -- - - -t — — — -- -- — — — — — — — — — -- 4=e
' _
U w ATLANTIC OCEAN
IZ U)Q W
I �
Z
PR0✓ECT TITLE CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM.- NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY.- MOFFATT & NICHOL
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE.• MAY 2018
SHEET TI TLE
RENOURISHMENT PLAN - SHEET 26 of 37
o ioo' zoo
i"=goo'
SHEET
28
F61OF -
61

a
i
- Z ,
X
-_ ----__�-----
�
�
�- =J
QQ
<� _
o
Cox, = t z 1 S M I T 2 5 U RB A4144<r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
HARRIS, BLACKFORDrl)IA�, I Y OSEPH B JR c HA&85. -�- z - - - - -
A-7Rt--= C� -- -TUX-- ��., I�-h+k4£N CE W JR :HR?7CN. BRfiE�dRC �Ft1 ? U J EF; -o--i-7O`E�- JAMJX C MCG.N�ti'� �'0'ti" _1
D�/4_ a--SLAnaDN-Q - t - - - T - J ANN - - Z UX SH y gI` - -7-'A � - BARNEY NC - -410R PS9 SA3: W u 1SS�G '.dG - - - - 1
C- w TPS FA . 5 z - �9G 3€K) 5 ONF7 NE EE -
C2
'*111
d —
——I-- --- --- —
— —--------- — -----�—___ --�-----------------�
BERM, -
EL +0.0
MHW
--
-------------------
-----
MHW-- M 00 0
EXISTING MTLLAJ
L _ ----- W
— — — — — — — — ---EXISTINaMLW — M —_. - r -- M! w
V)kMHW W MHW MHW MHW— HW
•M' M H W MHW ... MHW— — w-=IF�pprc'- 1uINVW ,
E--2�-- - - --- —---Lw--
W - - — - - — - M — — — —a M L'� —'—J -MLW PRDP(I� MHW w
Lu
LI`.I I M w-' �� - - - - - ------------------- -----� W
MSV LN -...-------------
------------------ ----�j---------
� PROPOSED MTL _ V)
— ... --- N � PROPOSED MLW -• --- ...— ---- YV�—..— MLW •� I
MLW MLW MLW MLW MLW MLW MLW MLW MLW MLW MLW MLW ML
Llj
__ _ _
J RENOURISHMENT SLOPE LIMIT J
- - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - -- - - -i - - - - - - - - -- -
I I
LU
LU
LU ATLANTIC OCEAN \
z
aw
CC w
N
�1 i
PR0✓ECT TITLE: CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY- MOFFATT & NICHOL
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE.- MAY 2018
SHEET TITLE.•
RENOURISHMENT PLAN - SHEET 27 of 37
0 100' 200'
1 "=100'
SHEET
29
OF
61

6
El
C
— — -- — — -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- — -- — -- — — — — — -
--=T — 14
� ��t--�--��—�--�-Q—�—�-----�---��--------,��+am��--coo-ovv��as�oc------------- ----- —�--
- ''`�� —a - ,z a •., —� 0 �z ! w -A -E4 NNOWtiERS SSOC A A' S.
�
_ -T _ - - - - - -- - — — — --- — — — — — — —"-! -- — —� — — — — — — — -
--- ----- -- - -- - -
---- ---—EMTINGMHW-------- --
_ --- BERK,,Et+60--------
- — — — — — — — �XtSTtidC�ivlTt — — — — —
EXISTING MLW - - — - — _
---------- --- uj
-
- —M Vv -- — — —MLW - — M W -- L Jv — - --J -- —MLW — - — — — — �_
FMHW MHW MHW N w -
-•- .-. HW
MHW MHW —MHW M W
O MHW
u PROPOSED MHW aw MHWLLJ
MHW M W —MHW— ..—MHW — W
W-----------------
--
PROPOSED MTL c------------------------
MLW MLW —N -----------------
(— MLW ... MLW — MLW --- MLW MLV�--�--
LL1 LW — MLW MLW LL.I
PROPOSED MLW — — — -- -- --- —MLW —MLW MLW MLW Z
Z
(� I RENOURISHMENT SLOPE LIMIT
a) --_1<
�___- ------ ----- - - - ------ - - - - -- -I
I I
UW
III Lu ATLANTIC OCEAN
�I�
I I
PROJECT TITLE CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DATUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY-• MOFFATT & NICHOL
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE-• MAY 2018
SHEET TITLE.-
RENOURISHMENT PLAN - SHEET 28 of 37
0 100' 200
r'=100'
SHEET
30
F61OF -
61

a
0
KERR, BANKS D I
— — — — — — —' — — — — — — — — — — — — —— — — —
_ GENESIS CONDO HM OWNERS ASSOC _ II
— GENESIS CONDO HM OWNERS ASSOC —! GENESIS CON-QQ_¢�WPERSsSbC= — — V OC�q� TERRACE b0
IL
OCEANS ASSOCIAriONS —
SUN BAY PROPERTIES � !
--- - - - - - - - - - - - -
w-- — — — — -- ---
— BERM, EL E 0 — EXISTING MTL — — — --- — — — — — — —
-._ ._ .- AA�1Ai - .-e- - - - -- - - - - - - - - -- - - -
� — — � EXISTING MLW
--_ �fv? W� _ vim— CyM'` FVC—===-FfL� --..— M W—
WI JL4
N
\f —------- _ILLI
i
Llj
MHW M W MHW — MHW------------------ M
..I ... ... MHW MHW �---------------——————— — — — ——'
MH MHW
... -•- MHW ...—MH ... MHW --• MHW ----MHW--•--MHW ...�
uj
CL PROPOSED MHW
-------- ---------------------- OJ
- --- -- ---1 w
W ------ ------ Z
----------
Z MLW LW MLW N PROPOSED MTL I
MLW W
J MLW LW MLW J
I..- MLW ...— M W •-• MLW ...—MLW -=-ivIL-W�—••- M W ..
PROPOSED MLW II
C)
Q
RENOURISHMENT SLOPE LIMIT — — — — — — _
-----------
----------- -------------------------� - __---------------_-
--
-- —�$ N --- — mLn
----------
w
LU
W
Q w
cr w ATLANTIC OCEAN Q I cLu
n
PR0✓ECT TITLE- CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY.- MOFFATT & NICHOL
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE.- MAY 2018
SHEET TITLE
RENOURISHMENT PLAN - SHEET 29 of 37
o too' zoo'
t"=too'
SHEET
31
F61Of -
61

r
M
__�---------- --- --_— --- _---=__-- ,i----- -- _—_--1
-� — I ---------- —� ------------ ---
MER --- 6 — 4 ---------- 2. ------ — I —
FINE KNOLL ?OWNES a_SQC— — 'E KN
OL'_ TOWNES ASSOC
— -- — T - — —�-- --i-----�---
— — — — — — PANE KNOLL 7GWNES ASSOC SKINNER, —
�ERR�. Ric -ARD �CSEK- CAW',ONNE.
GAR -AND r �DRd-5t GRAHAM, I VRG"ER.
_. —TUX MYRA-N--i �TI.X OHN R VICK'E r= W G JR
1 i=t-7AL--CL)i?E.!�—--:1,X GA- r-l�Rl
L
---- — — — — — — — — — ------ --— — ®---I---- - _— I T--- -- ---- ----- }-------H
I -- ---- I IK�
k1— �'�
Lv �7L�v
mI
MHW •••—MHW •- MHW -• MHW
i0i
- - - - - - - EXISTING MHW
''� - - EXISTING L- - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I w
-- _ - - - - - - - -
MH
EXISTING
EXISTING MLW
— MHW MHW MHW MHW -
ROPOS D a
ML'W — �� -. — MLW
.. MHW -- MHW ---- W-----MHW-
Li -- MHW -
----_ _---------ILIJ
— MLW — MLW — -- M W
--••—MHW—•••—MHW
W I LIJ
P MHW
------------------------------
PROPOSED MTL o J
N
_ MLW MLW — MLW ML MLW — MLW MLW -•• ML — MLW MLW ` MLW — ML — MLW — — MLW V
H
-� ----� -- - - -- - - ---- - _PROPOSED MLW
IRENOURISHMENT SLOPE LIMIT - I
I ---LET------ -- ------ ----- ----- -- - ----- ------------ -- -0 CO
I
I
_ U W
W LU
(n 7-
z
— — -Zt C/1
ATLANTIC OCEAN ~ I U I
PROJECT TITLE CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM.- NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY- MOFFATT & NICHOL
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE: MAY 2018
SHEET TI TLE
RENOURISHMENT PLAN - SHEET 30 of 37
0 100' 200'
t"=too'
11
SHEET
32
OF
61

--- - -- --- --
OOD CIRCLL-
--- - -- ----
I I
I I
I
-- --- -r----- 1E - -� --------------- �----�-I
----------� ------ - - -� -- -r--- 74 -- - - - --•------ �-----+ ---- �---- -�
BRYA1. HECKMAN, — — — t— — — — — -+----
C R JR JOHN H -�---_ �� —''— — — — — — — _ _ _
FTAI :UGOETI,.X MnNIC&----aA�ai:rEF+tiRS'. '—?- BRYANT �` -L— — — — -- — — -- — — — _ BAILEY. —
JAMES C JR %G' —1 —
VICTOR JR GARDNER, OWENS, AW BROWN FLYNN, K,
—I—FREDERICK C �A� W JR INVESTMENTS 8 SAMANTHA FRANCIS ROY ryy� — R88 3 —_ I— —WHITE, Roc F-
7
—� �TUK WILLA _ �L
— - - �— - - — Ti— — rte^ — — —F EETWOOD. — �- V
ETAL EDD K WILLIAM H 1EIR� JAM `S R71 — b + — — —
TRUST PARK I E7UX DOROTHY ETUX SARA W
-- — _
U-1 EXISTING MHW--------—BERIVrEC+b:O----{�--------__—_-- �--------_ L~L.I
U-1----- ------------ --— j -- — — — — — -- —— ------ —
-MHWMN�b"JMNN'-- MNV' MHW--- 1�'r,'W —M', -MHW -IJH'J M'�W M��W V,'Hlh' — — Z
Lti.l I — _ _ — _ _ — — --- EXISTING MTL —
----- _ _ ` - - - _ W
W ------------ ---------- I
(n -------- ------ EXISTING MLW - ---- — (n
_ L+J
------------
------------------
—M'`W--_ M W— ----- - I
--MSW-- --- -- --�----------------------- �
MHW MHW MHW MHW— MHW •• MHW-h�1�lFiW—�-1fW — '
w QMH W fi QMH Wt 1�*y��-.lam W =-
a — MLS-�LiW . M w
W PROPOSED MHW I Z
= PROPOSED MTL - - - - - - - - - - - _
N _ _ — �- U
U MLW — MLW MLW —... —MLW MLW MLW MLW MLW — _ - #AL - - ivICW - MLW —MLW —... MLW
I\ RENOURISHMENT SLOPE LIMIT
— — ATLANTIC OCEAN I
I
PROJECT TITLE: CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY- MOFFATT & NICHOL
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE: MAY 2018
SHEET TITLE.-
RENOURISHMENT PLAN - SHEET 31 of 37
0 100' 200'
1 "=100'
SHEET
33
OF -
61

c
li
-----i----------
�— — — — — — — — — NI RL A,CHARD, ROME'!SER, .;RACE C I KNO'', SEE STA ENCS — LAS C k3E B Mi�_EK x 4CEJ TR 3ROD S—
.,^SEpr- g W�-'AM A E_.�X KOdtiRSC ,V C EDWARD 'r ROc_ —
v c
— — RCu, S �C E__ _ — _
—X JEAN VIRGIN - -- — i-- — — — — i— — — 1'L —STA L"-T'R 17� E�AL DAV IUAxwE-- �x
AURA
- - - - -T -- - --
LID
— — ---- XIST4NG-AHV�I------ 4�----- — ----- —----------�W
= N Vv — — -P h t, �' W -Li P VFr — _� E EL +Cr& — — — EXISTING MTL w
— --- - M P W -- --- iJ � W --- M'r-'J�' -- —MHW
ujLij
— — -_ - — — - -------EXISTING MLW --------------------_ - _ - _ - - _ Vd— �T` tiA LILT
-1
_ - - - -� T� — M L v�� -- tJ L W --
- — — -
-MHW M#W - 7VIHW M,`V, —MH--MHW--- w MHW —MHW MHW w .. MHW MHW—... MHW— MHW —MHW— ..
Z [Al - M W a0 - PROPOSED MHW LLI
Z
J - -
- - - - - �=4 - - - - - - - PROPOSED MTL
-- - - _
- - - - T
c\j
U MLW -- MLW ---- MLW •• MLW ��-MLW - MLW ---- MLW •••— MLW •• MLW MLW -- MLW •--- MLW ---- MLW—•• MLW (�
Q�_ _ -__ 7RENOURISHMENT PROPOSED MLW
SLOPE LIMIT
------------- - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - _
-
------------------------- - - - - - -
--- I
I- - ---� - - --- - - --- -- -
w-- -- -- - ----- - - -- - - -- - I
w
IZ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I
w---------—
IATLANTIC OCEAN
PRO✓ECT TITLE CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY.- MOFFATT & NICHOL
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE.- MAY 2018
SHEET TI TLE.•
RENOURISHMENT PLAN - SHEET 32 of 37
0 loo' zoo'
1"=100'
SHEET
34
F61Of -
61

z
Y
Q
2-
s
Y
Z
Q
m
LL
0
m
i
cl
_ ---- --------
------ - - - _--_---_____ _-------- ----I
----- }_-----------__ r----- T ------------ ----� ---------------- --
--__ --- _ ------ - -- -- - ------
- ----- -----j----- -___�-
— — — — 12 ;:cvING'0A_, rr� "P K� - :criRF - - c c
F O r -EH- --ANS CON ,. MAR -OWE. � _ J �_L _V VO'v K, W,L�J AN LRCS.... A�,L
�y MORCAh -'� MMER PARK R'�TZE'PA_ -A
ti..'A S,,ME KINSE ",RO WI__AM t JR
AMP -Ori -P ETA_ E�JX ^!-v�� S W L_ AM A I WCB RENTALS LLC WCB KEN'A__ _ KA ER NE ,R E-�X MAN AGEMEN- V JR E'A�
E'A. -'A- TRuS
F __ 1�
(f EXISTING MHV-71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — _ — BERM, EL +6.0
EXISTING MTL
M —---i✓N'W—. 1 — —
w --MHW MHN'— — — — — — — — — — — U.I
M�
h-------- ----------------------------------= _ _ _ .
— — — — — — — — — EXISTING MLW W
— — — — _W — P✓ — — _
_ __ — _ _ �
MLW M'W —h7�N=PSLW-Z�LW�
____
W MHW MHW MLjW — — —.— — #Hyla_—_ _---�uFh}W— — !Ik{yY — — -ikiW— — —MHW—_TMHW — - • MHW ..—MHW MHW— • MHW W
Z a PROPOSEDMHW
J ---- —— ---- _-- — —'-- — Z
-------------------------------------�--------------- -- — _- =-- ----� J
PROPOSEBiNTC -- — — — — — — -- — _
MLWMLW MLW — _ — — MLV1l---- MLW N MLW 4 �LYI — — mcw — MLW — MLW — — MLW — — MLW — MLWMLW U
— -- -- — _--__--- ----—�PROPOSEDMLW
RENOURISHMENT SLOPE LIMIT
CM
UCM
r
w
— — — — — — — — — -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- — — — — C — — — — — — — — — — — -- — — — -- — — —
�
Lu
cr III
F-�cl)
— � -- ATLANTIC OCEAN
I
PROJECT TITLE.- CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY- MOFFATT & NICHOL
PREPARED FOR.- CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE.- MAY 2018
SHEET TITLE.-
RENOURISHMENT PLAN - SHEET 33 of 37
0 100 200
r=100,
SHEET
35
OF
61

-- - 7--
- — — ---- — — — — —
r�__---- __T_-_- - - -- _�
-_
-ESTER -OWXSEND AN --E, DAL'ON K� �ZER, ',-N HATFIELD
WAD.0 ^M 'K TH P _
T E� C OM SON, �, _ _
lA I--. U Awn ,. -�
E' � BE �- - _ v0'_E a� -F _
A A A
P X s.,- � � �A _ _ ��,. ..Ro�M �. JO��. _� �_. �� s,,,- oaER
cNAR�_�� _ � � � , c
d x nAN-
-C r J _ � JAM S T'X
—E VIR SHEILA A MARAN 1 �n t.,,X —E -AL VESEJY HOJSE _.� ri E7. S"_VA c'LX BRENDA UX JEAN
--+— PAR ,<
EXISTI G MHW — — — — — — — — — — --- —
— — — — —
—1 — t
BERM, EL +6.0
LLL ----------- ------ -- --- � ---- EXISTING MTL ---- Lj
WJ W—. TW
— — — — — — — — �
^W — MHw _, _ _ _
EXISTING MLW J cn
ui
--- ` �-- - — — — -— - MHW MHW `� MHW MHW ------ --- _---- M W' — — --TvL V)
MLW �� MLJ� M -- — — — — -
- � � MHW W - MHW •-W MHW v MHW---- MHW—• MHW �—
MHW MHW MHW MHW -- — I
Lu
L — — — PROPOSED MHW p
JLLI
— — — — — —
— — — — —� PNOP9SED MTL MLW a MLW — MLW — MLW —MLW — ---MLW-----MLW = MLW MLW — MLWti�( MttAr— —.. _ µL L ... --- MLW _
------------- PROPOSED MLW --�
J —_--- -- ------ -- — RENOURISHMENT SLOPE LIMIT — ------- -----------------------
> -- — — --
< — — C—Ey
Lu
—t--- --------
Lu w
w =
vr— —
Q w -- — — — — — — — — — — — — --- —
cn
Y — $
ATLANTIC OCEAN
z
/ I I
PROJECT TITLE- CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY.• MOFFATT & NICHOL
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE.- MAY 2018
SHEET TITLE:
RENOURISHMENT PLAN - SHEET 34 of 37
o 100' zoo'
i"=io0'
SHEET
36
OF
61

L_
u
z
m
ilP
z
-T-
— — — — — — — ---
— -
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — I
---- ----------
tILLY RUSS 1=2 — — — -- — — — — — — — — — — — —
PASSING, RA - PH BEASLEY, CARTER, HONEYCUTT, 7
FOX, DAVID A I STACY, B j, R D HOLDING CO I K K L M LLC RHETT ETIJX
&-7-TEAL i SUSAN HULL ETUX PEGGY CLARENCE B RODGER CORAL PAY WEST CONDO INC
I ET6X JULIA ETAL CO TRS JOANNE ESTATE ENTAREFETI­T�AL­ EUTX RICHELLE
LSC
--------- -
- - ----_ CID
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- -- - -
Lli — — — — — — - — — — — — — — — — EXlSTrNGI Lij
wM-H V -V-- Lli
MHW --MHW- W -11IF VHW -MHW- w VHw
M.H V�
(f) --- - - __ - U)
m: L - - - -- - - - - - ----- - - ____ :� -__ --- 7-- - - - - -=-- -_ ---
Lli EXISTING MLW uj
Lli — — — — — — — — uj
U)tTLWaw-= — — — -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
_&Al VILW 7 W__ W
M MHW HW -----M M4 _L�=Mg*L_ _.. _�_=M4_ --m MHW MHW MHW
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — w S\_ — — — — — — — —-----------------
0
LLI — -- — -- Wz --------
------- - - - - - C- D4 - - - - - - - - - - - - --- -
6- — =pROP9SED MTL
_j
MLW _j
MLW -----MLW -- --MLW-----MLW-----MLW-----MLW---cli
- :MEW MLW MLW----- MLW MLW----- MLW----- MLW MLW
PROPOSED MLW
\7RENOURISHMENT SLOPE LIMIT
— — --- --- — — — — — --- — — — — — — — — — — w
— — -- — — — -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- — — — — — — — — — — -
Z cn
< Lu
(r uj
ATLANTIC OCEAN R- I cn
-----------------— — — — — — — — -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -
PRO,JECT TITLE: CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: N"D 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY- MOFFATr& NICHOL
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA 7F.- MAY 2018
SHEET TIFLE.-
RENOURISHMENT PLAN - SHEET 35 of 37
0 0'
1 "=100'
SHEET
37
OF
61

z
Q
1
z
c
Y
z
e
0
cl
a
0
I
Z-
-
12 —+— j ----_
---------------=--—_—--_
—
-- --- —— — — — --— — _ ---
I -- -- -- Hr. -ANTS LODGE iNC
I� _— t --------- 00
-- ------ ----- -- --- ---------— — — — — — — — — — — — —
M—M
----
BERM, EL +6.0 EXISTING HW - _ _ _ _
-- - --
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Lli- - - - - - - _ EXISTING MTL Lli
IJry_ -
- - �, - 1�4 N W — M �; W � — M H VJ M r W -- — M'•� W -- . � I =
------- I
W-------- ----
W EXISTING MLW L!J
Li
tdin� — :—1NP��Mr�- FAFIW��-. _—1�AMYN' -= _ Mw4L-- _ - kAMW �=-�kAMW�----idtaW —r :._ _-. - wIY�vIT� m.: jay— - - - }w _ U
I I PROPOSED MHW o I
- _ - - - - - - —4� J-_--------------�--
ZI - ---- �PROPOSEDMTL --------------------- W
_ �--V - N Z
�* MLW
J •. MLW _ _ ULW--- - MLW- �--- MLW MLW — — MLW MLW MLW MLW MLW
U PROPOSED MLW — — — — — — — _ _ _ _ _ — — — I U
QRENOURISHM ENT SLOPE LIMIT ~
------ - - - --- -1--- --- -- -- -------------- --
I �W -
I
F — — — — —
W -
-- — — Q W
_—-- — — — ——— — — — — — — — — — ----~-------------------1
ATLANTIC OCEAN
I I
I I
PROJECT TITLE- CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPAREDBY- MOFFATT & NICHOL
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE.- MAY 2018
SHEET TITLE.-
RENOURISHMENT PLAN - SHEET 36 of 37
0 100' 200'
1 "=100'
SHEET
38
OF
61

O
I— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - — — — — — — — —
I--FNS.NC----L — — — — ------------- ��----— — — -- —— ----
GLCRES'3N' V
�FvF_c�-c �----------------
------------------------------- — —eFvf ------
co
-BERM, EL +6.0 - - - - - _ - - - - - - -EXISTING MHW- -
s;
fSN1------- 1N-= -- --
--1
= I / EXISTING MTL
_ PROPOSED MHy1L-
FWI , EXISTING MLW �pBOPOSFq-YTL _ - - - - - - --------------------
'- -- - - — - - — - -- —
h4''�4'
-�__�-- 17-
MLW
- PROPOSED MLW
w -------- - ----- -------------------------------
-MLW�...�MCW- ---- ---------------------
RENOURGRIVIENT SLOPE t1Mtf� - -- - -- -- - -- -
- - - - - - - - - -- -- -- --
I--- ---------- - ------------ -- - -- - - - -_ _ ATLANTIC OCEAN
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
PROJECT TITLE.• CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY.• MOFFATT & NICHOL
PREPARED FOR. CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE.' MAY 2018
SHEET TITLE.-
RENOURISHMENT PLAN - SHEET 37 OF 37
0 too' 200'
1 "=100'
SHEET
39
OF
61

MOREHEAD CITY
�DI HARBOR ODMDS
PROPOSED BORROW AREA
COORDINATE TABLE
POINT
NORTHING
EASTING
A
335251.00
2689873.17
B
335246.38
2697361.70
C
331134.26
2697357.83
D
330742.17
2697024.91
E
330752.97
2689859.35
AII
BIII
C'
BORROW
DREDGE[
(-52 NAVD -- ... , , .
PROJECT TITLE- CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY.- MOFFATT & NICHOL
LEGEND
PROPOSED BORROW AREA CONTROL POINT
A
2011 VIBRACORE LOCATION
O0 (SEE ATTACHMENT 1 FOR DATA SUMMARY)
NOTES
BATHYMETRICAL CONTOURS SHOWN BASED ON
MULTIBEAM SURVEYS PERFORMED BY
GEODYNAMICS IN 2018.
2. BORROW AREA COORDINATES ARE NC STATE
PLANE, NAD 1983 (FEET).
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE: MAY 2018
SHEET TITLE:
BORROW AREA SITE PLAN
0 1000' 2000'
1 "=1000'
SHEET
40
F61Of -
61
I �
1 I
1 I
1 I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I 1
I I
1 I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
1 I
�
„
I I
I I
I
1 �
B
I 1
I I
1 I
I I
I I
I I
I
f
�
r
I
I I
I I
� I
I I
I �
I
I
C �
I
0 I
1
I
I
I
�
MOREHEAD CITY
HARBOR NAVIGATION
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CHANNEL
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
SHEET TITLE:
BORROW AREA SITE PLAN
0 1000' 2000'
1 "=1000'
SHEET
40
F61Of -
61

SECTION A -A
0
F
0
0
07
H
J
07
Z co
J
.. .:.
Z 07
00 -20
0
.........
-20 O
O
0
0
EXISTING GRADE
;
>
Q Q
¢
EXISTING GRADE
O
Q Q
WZZ
0.
... _ _.......
0
>
H-40--
JW
r
R-
m....
40
JW
W W
—77
—
W W
LL
v
LL
v
-60
. ....... ....... :...... ....... ... .... .. .....................
..... ...,..
60
-80—
--80
0 1000 2000
3000 4000
5000 6000
7000 8000
9000 10000
0
E;
Z
00
00
-20
Q Q
> Z
J W 40
W W
LL
-60
-80-
0
DISTANCE WEST TO EAST (FEET)
SECTION B -B
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
DISTANCE WEST TO EAST (FEET)
SECTION C -C
7000
9000 1
-80
0
0
0
07
H
J
07
J
Z 00
.. .:.
00
20 >
0
EXISTING GRADE
Z
O
0
0
EXISTING GRADE
;
C a
>Z
Om......
40 J W
Q
>Z
J W 40
W W
... _ _.......
LL
v
-60
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
DISTANCE WEST TO EAST (FEET)
SECTION C -C
7000
9000 1
-80
0
0
07
H
07
Z
00
O 0 -20
�
.
Q Q
0
EXISTING GRADE
C a
>Z
(r
Q
>Z
J W 40
... _ _.......
-40 W W
W W
—77
W Lu
LL
v
LL
..
-60
......
-60
-80
-80
0 1000 2000
3000 4000
5000 6000
7000 8000
9000 10000
PRO C TITLE.- CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY.• MOFFATT & NICHOL
DISTANCE WEST TO EAST (FEET)
r PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE.' MAY 2018
L
NOTE
TYPICAL EXCAVATION DEPTH VIA HOPPER DREDGE
WILL BE 2-3 FEET PER PASS (INCOMPLETE CUTS).
SHEET TITLE -
BORROW AREA TYPICAL SECTIONS
SHEET
41
F61OF -
61

30
20
i
00
0
Q 10
z
Lu
Lu
O
n �
Q 0
W
W
-10
i -20
z
J1
Y
Z
Q
J
Ji
Q
Y
TRANSECT 35
i II
I � i
II � II
BERM EL +6.0
BERM WIDTH -- 53'
BASE FILL @ - 28iCY/FT
\ �I
MHW, EL +1.5
I �
— — — _ ---
7 MLW, EL -2.3
EXISTING GRADE
I ! I I
-20
600
100 200 300 400 500
DISTANCE (FEET)
PROJECT TITLE.- CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY.- MOFFATT & NICHOL
30
20
co
co
0
siva
30
20
00
co
0
Q 10
z
W
W
z
O
Q 0
W
J
W
rPREPARED FOR.- CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE.' MAY 2018
L
at
-20
TRANSECT 36
'
I ;
I
I
I
1
BERM EL +6.0
BERM WIDTH — 5$'
BASE FILL @ — 30 CY/FT
it
20, Di MHW, EL +1.5
r7 MTI FI -n d
MLW, EL -2.3
EXIS ING GRADE
I
100 200 300 400 500
DISTANCE (FEET)
SHEET TITLE:
FRENOURISHMENT CROSS SECTIONS - TRANSECTS 35 AND 36
30
20
00
co
0
-10
-20
600
SHEET
42
F61OF -
61

30
20
TRANSECT 37
100 200 300 400 500
DISTANCE (FEET)
PROJECT TITLE CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY.- MOFFATT & NICHOL
30
20
co
Go
0
10 Q
z
H
W
W
LL
z
O
0 Q
>
W
J
W
51f
-20
600
30
20
3
Q 10
z
F-
W
W
LL
z
O
Q 0
W
J
W
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE.- MAY 2018
-10
-20
TRANSECT 38
BERM EL +�.0
BERM WIDtH - 60'
BASE FILL - 32 CY/FT
j
�o•r MHW, EL +1.5
- Y MTl El -QA
—
I
7! MLW, EL -2.3
EXISTING GRADE
-20
600
100 200 300 400
DISTANCE (FEET)
500
SHEET TITLE.-
RENOURISHMENT CROSS SECTIONS - TRANSECTS 37 AND 38
30
r*Zf'
10 Q
z
W
W
LL
z
O
0 Q
W
J
W
10
r
SHEET
43
OF
61
I
I
i ' I
�
I ,
BERM EL +6.0
BERM WIDTH -- 5V
BASE FILL @ 33 CY/FT
O MHW, EL +1.5
MTI FI -0 d
11 =_
Q'I MLW, EL -2.3
EXISTING GRADE
it
III li
100 200 300 400 500
DISTANCE (FEET)
PROJECT TITLE CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY.- MOFFATT & NICHOL
30
20
co
Go
0
10 Q
z
H
W
W
LL
z
O
0 Q
>
W
J
W
51f
-20
600
30
20
3
Q 10
z
F-
W
W
LL
z
O
Q 0
W
J
W
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE.- MAY 2018
-10
-20
TRANSECT 38
BERM EL +�.0
BERM WIDtH - 60'
BASE FILL - 32 CY/FT
j
�o•r MHW, EL +1.5
- Y MTl El -QA
—
I
7! MLW, EL -2.3
EXISTING GRADE
-20
600
100 200 300 400
DISTANCE (FEET)
500
SHEET TITLE.-
RENOURISHMENT CROSS SECTIONS - TRANSECTS 37 AND 38
30
r*Zf'
10 Q
z
W
W
LL
z
O
0 Q
W
J
W
10
r
SHEET
43
OF
61

30
TRANSECT 39
i � ail IIS
I �
20-
co
I
Q
BERM EL +6.0I
Z I I
BERM WIDTH ?- 57'
W BASE FILL @ -r 38 CY/FT
LLJ 10 —
i
Z j
>
Lu
J Q MHW, EL +1.5
r w 2o.r
z MLW, EL -2.3
EXISTING GRADE
y \
/
-10-
>
10 -- -- — --- _
C
% -20
s 0
z
s
Y
Z
Q
1J
L
O
5
G
y
O
100 200 300 400 500
DISTANCE (FEET)
PROJECT TITLE: CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY- MOFFATT & NICHOL
30
20
co
co
0
Q
Z
H
w
10 LL
Z
O
Q
w
J
w
0
-10
-20
600
30
20
y
Q 10
Z
H
w
w
Z
O
Q 0
w
J
w
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE.- MAY 2018
-20
TRANSECT 40
' I
BERM EL +6.0
BERM WIDTH — 42'
BASE FILL @ --- 31 CY/FT j
IN
24r Q LMHW, EL +1.5
f Q MLW, EL -2.3
-<<
EXISTING GRADE
\
I \
i
i
20
600
100 200 300 400 500
DISTANCE (FEET)
r SHEET TIRE.•
RENOURISHMENT CROSS SECTIONS - TRANSECTS 39 AND 40
30
20
co
co
0
10 Q
Z
H
Lu
Lu
ILLZ
O
0 a
w
J
w
SHEET
44
F61OF -
61

30
20
co
co
10
Z
LLJ
Lij
4:1
Z
0
0
Lu
w
-10
-20
O
TRANSECT 41
30
30
20
20
BIERM EL +6.0
BERM WIDTH — 46
co
BASE FILL @ — 25 CY/FT
lo
< >
10
Z
F-
0 0
LU
Lu
LL
100.
z
Z
I
MHW, EL +1.5
0
LLJ
IVITI El -n A 0
Q
LLI
0
IVILW, EL -2.3
w
z
W
EXISTING GRADE
LLj
-10
-10
-20
-20
100 200 300
400 500 600
DISTANCE (FEET)
PR0,1ECT TITLE.- CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM.- NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY.- MOFFATT & NICHOL
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE.- MAY 2018
TRANSECT 42
BERM EL +6.0
BERM WIDTH — 66'
BASIE FILL @ — 35 CY/Ft
II
MHW, EL +1.5
MT' Pi -n A
7 MLW, EL -2.3
EXISTING GRADE
-20
600
100 200 300 400 500
DISTANCE (FEET)
r SHEET T1 TL E.-
RENOURISHMENT CROSS SECTIONS - TRANSECTS 41 AND 42
30
20
10
-10
SHEET
45
Of -
61

30
TRANSECT 43
i ! ,
I i
i
I !
GERM EL +6.0 j
ERM WIDTH — 64
BASE FILL @ — 37 CY/FT
24 �+ MHW, EL +1.5
MLW, EL -2.3
EXISTING GRADE
i
i
100 200 300 400 500
DISTANCE (FEET)
PRO✓ECT TITLE CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY.• MOFFATT & NICHOL
30
20
00
00
O
'iL
600
30
20
PREPARED FDR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE.' MAY 2018
-10
-20
TRANSECT 44
I
20
w
I
BERM EL +6.0
co
BERM WIDTH —
Q
10-
z
� I
I
W
— —_
MLW, EL 2.3
W
EXISTING GRADE
w
O
i
Q
0 -
Lu
w
J
W
j
-10
v
Q
i
Q
-20
0
z
Y
Z
Q
rn
w
L
O
w
Q
O
TRANSECT 43
i ! ,
I i
i
I !
GERM EL +6.0 j
ERM WIDTH — 64
BASE FILL @ — 37 CY/FT
24 �+ MHW, EL +1.5
MLW, EL -2.3
EXISTING GRADE
i
i
100 200 300 400 500
DISTANCE (FEET)
PRO✓ECT TITLE CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY.• MOFFATT & NICHOL
30
20
00
00
O
'iL
600
30
20
PREPARED FDR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE.' MAY 2018
-10
-20
TRANSECT 44
I
I
i
I
BERM EL +6.0
BERM WIDTH —
BASE FILL @ — 3tCY/FT
I
_
� I
I
MHW, EL +1.5
— —_
MLW, EL 2.3
;
EXISTING GRADE
i
100 200 300 400 500
DISTANCE (FEET)
SHEET TITLE.-
RENOURISHMENT CROSS SECTIONS - TRANSECTS 43 AND 44
30
`*.
4
10 Q
Z
W
W
LL
Z
O
0 Q
W
J
W
20
600
SHEET
46
F61Of -
61
L J

PR0,1ECT F17LE.- CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DATUM. NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY- MOFFATT& NICHOL
PREPARED f -OR.- CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE: MAY 2018
30
20
off
-20
100 200 300 400 500 600
DISTANCE (FEET)
SHEET TITLE.-
RENOURISHMENT CROSS SECTIONS - TRANSECTS 45 AND 46
SHEET
T
47
Of -
61
TRANSECT 45
30
30
30-
20
20
20-
BERM EL +6.0
BERM WIDTH -j 62'
OD
BASE FILL @ -27 CY/FT
10
10
10-
OD
00
OD
co
Z
O
W
Z
j
z
Z
F-
MHW, EL +1.5
w
0
Lu
LL
MT1 F:i -n A
0
U.1 LL
F-
0
Z
M LW, EL -2.3
z
W
0
0
-j
W
F-
<
EXI$TING GRADE
F-
<
W
Lu
Lu
-10
-10
-10-
-20
-20
-20
100
200 300
400 500
600
DISTANCE (FEET)
07
PR0,1ECT F17LE.- CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DATUM. NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY- MOFFATT& NICHOL
PREPARED f -OR.- CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE: MAY 2018
30
20
off
-20
100 200 300 400 500 600
DISTANCE (FEET)
SHEET TITLE.-
RENOURISHMENT CROSS SECTIONS - TRANSECTS 45 AND 46
SHEET
T
47
Of -
61

30
20
10
TRANSECT 47
30 30
20 20
bt:HM LL +6.01
I
BERM WIDTH 61' 00
BASE FILL @ 33 CY/FT
10 > lo
<
z
co
W
LL
z
z
MHW, EL +1.50
Lu —
�71 IVITI . EL -QA- - o UJI LL 0
7! MLW, EL -2.3
Z Lu
0
Lu
EXISTING GRADE
<
>
Lu
UJI
-10 -10
Po -20
100 200 300 400 500 600
DISTANCE (FEET)
PROJECT T17LE.- CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED 8)- MOFFATT & NICHOL
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA 7E- MAY 2018
TRANSECT 48
BERM E� +6.0
ISlNG GRADE
BERM WIDTH - 71'
EX BASE FILL C@ - 33 CY/FT
24r �I MHW, EL +11.5
IF -71 UTI F1 -n A
0! MLW, EL -2.3
-20
100 200 300 400 500 600
DISTANCE (FEET)
30
20
co
00
0
iLl
SHEET TITLE.-
RENOURISHMENT CROSS SECTIONS - TRANSECTS 47 AND 48
SHEET
48
of -
61

30
20
00
co
10
Z
F-
LU
LLI
� z
-�j
-L 0
-n F-
0
III
W
-10
-20
C
TRANSECT 49
EXISTING GRADE BERM EL +6.01
BERM WIDTH 39'
BASE FILL @ 28 CY/FT
Ii i
17! MHW, EL +1.5
RA
-4
� MLW, EL -2.3
-20
600
100 200 300 400 500
DISTANCE (FEET)
PROLIECT TITLE- CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVID 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY- MOFFATT& NICHOL
30
20
Go
co
0
10
co
co
0
30
20
TRANSECT 50
30
�zf'
co
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE.- MAY 2018
MR
-20
100 200 300 400
DISTANCE (FEET)
500
SHEET TITLE.-
RENOURISHMENT CROSS SECTIONS - TRANSECTS 49 AND 50
--1,- -20
600
SHEET
49
OF
61

30
20
OD
OD
0
Q 10
Z
W
n LWL
Z
O
a 0
>
W
W
i -10
u
Q
-20
2
m
Y
Z
Q
m
W
0
O
G
z
O
TRANSECT 51
I i
I '
j
'I
,
i
i
BERM EL +6.0
I
BERM WIDTH — 89'
BASE FILL @ — 37 CY/FT
I
� �
20'
Q MHW, EL +1.5
-- _
Q j MLW, EL -2.3
EXISTING GRADE
II
100 200 300 400 500
DISTANCE (FEET)
PROJECT TITLE- CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY.• MOFFATT & NICHOLBY.• MOFFATT & NICHOL
30
20
co
00
0
-10
-20
600
30
20
00
w
0
Q 10
Z
W
W
LL
Z
O
Q 0
W
J
W
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE: MAY 2018
i[S
-20
TRANSECT 52
30
20
100 200 300 400
DISTANCE (FEET)
500
r
SHEET TITLE.•
RENOURISHMENT CROSS SECTIONS - TRANSECTS 51 AND 52
-10
-+-20
600
SHEET
50
F61Of -
61

30
20
ai
co
0 10-
<
F -
r, w
Luz
0 0
z W
W
7
-10
a
r,
-20
a 0
_z
Y
Z
C
C�
C
2
'1
Q
rY
C
TRANSECT 55
I I ,
I I,
i
r
�i
\ EXISTING GRADEi BRM EL +6.0
BRM WIDTH — 63'
�G B SE FILL @ — 35 Cy/FT
II li �
24� L MHW,EL+1.5
MLW, EL -2.3
100 200 300 400
DISTANCE (FEET)
PRO✓ECT TITLE.- CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED 8Y.• MOFFATT & NICHOL
30
20
00
10 >>
Q
z
F -
w
Lu
z
0
o a
w
J
w
10
-20
500 600
30-
20
co
j 10
Q
z
Lu
w
z
0
F- 0
w
J
Lu
-10
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE- MAY 2018
-20
0
TRANSECT 56
I j
i
EXISTING GRADE',
BERM EL +6.0
BERM WIDTH —:78'
BASE FILL @ — 33 CY/FT
20•
�_ MHW, EL +1.5
MTII
MLW, EL -2.3
i
I i
100 200 300 400 500
DISTANCE (FEET)
SHEET TITLE.-
RENOURISHMENT CROSS SECTIONS - TRANSECTS 55 AND 56
061
20
co
co
10 j
Q
z
w
w
z
0
0
w
J
Lu
-10
-20
600
SHEET
51
OF
61

30
20
co
Q 10-
z
H
W
W
r, 0_
Z
O
i > 0 -
Lu
W
i
-10
Q
-20
z 0
s
Y
Z
Q
1]
,J
O
Q
C
I
TRANSECT 57
I i '
I EXISTINGGRADE
BERM EL +6.0
BERM WIDTH — 85'
BASE FILL I@ — 45 CY/FT
� 2o•r !; _ MHW, EL +1.5
Fl
MLW, EL -2.3
i
100 200 300 400
DISTANCE (FEET)
PRO✓ECT TITLE.• CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY.- MOFFATT & NICHOL
L
500
30
20
600
00
00
10 Q
Z
W
W
LL
Z
O
0 j
W
J
W
iG
30
20
co
OD
D
Q 10
Z
W
W
Z
O
0
W
J
W
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DATE: MAY 2018
-10
TRANSECT 58
\ EXISTING GRADE
BERM EL +6.0
j BERM WIDTH 67'
BASE FILL @ — 33 CY/FT
i
2p.� — MHW, EL +1.5
UTI Fl _n 11
MLW, EL -2.3
I
30
20
co
co
D
10 Q
Z
H
W
W
LL
Z
O
0 j
W
J
W
-10
I
100 200 300 400
DISTANCE (FEET)
500
SHEET TITLE.•
RENOURISHMENT CROSS SECTIONS - TRANSECTS 57 AND 58
600
SHEET
52
OF -
61

30
010Z20-
10-
z
W
W
LL
Z
O
J;
� o
z W
J
5 W
-10
u
a
i
a
�' 20
TRANSECT 59
' I
20
ISTING GRADE
i
00
00
!BERM EL +6.0
,BERM WIDTH - 40'
p
,BASE FILL @ - 25 rY/FT
I
I I
' I
24' 01 MHW, EL +1.5
Q I MLW, EL -2.3
>
10
i
I
100 200 300 400 500
DISTANCE (FEET)
PRO✓ECT TITLE CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY.• MOFFATT & NICHOL
30 30
-20
20
00
00
co
co
p
p
.10
Q
>
10
Z
Z
H
F-
LU
W
W
W
LL
LL
O
p
-0
a
F-
0
W
W
J
J
W
W
--lo
-10
20
600
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE.- MAY 2018
TRANSECT 60
30
20
00
co
p
10
100 200 300 400 500
DISTANCE (FEET)
SHEET TI TLE.-
RENOURISHMENT CROSS SECTIONS - TRANSECTS 59 AND 60
600
SHEET
53
F61Of -
61

30
20
co
Qlo
--
z
F -
w
LLJ
J LL
Z
O
Q
0--
>
Lu
J
w
Y
-10
i
-20
z
0
r
Y
z
z
a
z
c
TRANSECT 61
30
20
10 Q
Z
H
LU
LU
LL
Z
O
o a
w
J
w
sit
100 200 300 400 500
DISTANCE (FEET)
PRO✓ECT TITLE.- CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY.- MOFFATT & NICHOL
L
600
30
20
4
Q 10
Z
f—
w
w
LL
Z
O
a 0
w
J
w
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE.' MAY 2018
.5tf
TRANSECT 62
30
20
4
-10
100 200 300 400
DISTANCE (FEET)
500
SHEET TITLE.-
RENOURISHMENT CROSS SECTIONS - TRANSECTS 61 AND 62
600
SHEET
54
OF
61

30
TRANSECT 63
i
20 t r
!, I
I I f
BERM EL +6.0
co BERM WIDTH 60'
p BASE FILL @ —38 CY/FT
>
lo
-
z \
r
z �o
MHW, EL +1.5
Q 0 --
JMLW, EL -2.3
W EXISTING GRADE
-10-
-20-
0
10 -20
Z
Y
Z
G
iJ
7'
G
C
100 200 300 400
DISTANCE (FEET)
PRO✓ECT TITLE.- CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY.• MOFFATT & NICHOL
500
30
20
10 Q
z
W
W
LL
z
O
0 Q
W
J
W
-10
-20
600
30
20
co
p
Q 10
z
W
W
LL
z
O
Q 0
W
J
W
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DATE.' MAY 2018
-10
TRANSECT 64
30
20
00
co
p
100 200 300 400
DISTANCE (FEET)
500
r
SHEET TITLE.•
RENOURISHMENT CROSS SECTIONS - TRANSECTS 63 AND 64
10
-20
600
i
SHEET
55
F61Of -
61

30
20
i�
00
0
Q 10
Z
1 --
Lu w
r LL!
4---
z Z
O
a 0
>
Lu
J
W
-10
i
i -20
z
0
r,
Y
Z
�J
-n
Q
7
TRANSECT 65
30
20
co
W
0
100 200 300 400 500
DISTANCE (FEET)
PRO✓ECT TITLE." CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY.- MOFFATT & NICHOL
&K
-20
600
00
co
0
30
20
TRANSECT 66
30
20
I.,
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE: MAY 2018
-10
-20
0
100 200 300 400
DISTANCE (FEET)
500
SHEET TITLE.•
RENOURISHMENT CROSS SECTIONS - TRANSECTS 65 AND 66
SI%
-20
600
SHEET
56
OF
61

30
20
CD
0
Q lo
-
z
W
lWl
Z
O
i
Q 0
z W
J
W
-10
Q
i -20
z 0
m
s
Y
Z
G
1'
Q
C
TRANSECT 67
I
I
I� I
II
I i
j
BERM IEL +6.0
i
BERM �VIDTH — 41'
BASE FILL @ — 31 CY/FT
MHW, EL +1.5
MLW, EL -2.3
EXISTING GRADE
i
100 200 300 400
DISTANCE (FEET)
r PROJECT TITLE.- CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY- MOFFATT & NICHOL
500
30
20
co
co
0
600
-10
-20
TRANSECT 68
30
20
30
20
00
co
0
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE.' MAY 2018
Ott
Irk
100 200 300 400 500
DISTANCE (FEET)
SHEET TITLE.•
RENOURISHMENT CROSS SECTIONS - TRANSECTS 67 AND 68
600
r SHEET
57
OF
61

30
20
ai
O
Q 10
Z
� F -
x W
r lL
O �
Z
= O
Q 0
J
W
-10
i
-20
TRANSECT 69
I I I
I
j
I I
BERM EL +6.0 '
BERM WIDTH - 35'
BASE FILL @ -'34 CY/FT
r
MH W, EL +1.5
L
n '
—UTI, EL --QA
MLW, EL -2.3
j EXISTING GRADE
j
20
z 0600
Y
Z
Li
O
Q
C
30
20
co
co
0
-10
100 200 300 400 500
DISTANCE (FEET)
r PROJECT TITLE. CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY- MOFFATT & NICHOL
L
30
20
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE.- MAY 2018
L
stf,
TRANSECT 70
I I'
I
'
BERM EL +6.0
BERM WIDTH - 72'
BASE FILL @ 35 CY/FT
j I �
j
I
!I
V MHW, EL +1.5
MTI FI _o 4
�7 MLW, EL -2.3
LZ
EXISTING GRADE
\ II
i
I
j
-20
0
100 200 300 400
DISTANCE (FEET)
500
r SHEET TITLE.-
RENOURISHMENT CROSS SECTIONS - TRANSECTS 69 AND 70
30
20
F
-10
-20
600
IN
SHEET
58
F61Of -
61

30
20--
00
D
Q
10-
z
H
w
Z
T O
Q 0-
-w
� J
w
Y
% -10
% -20
z 0
r
Y
Z
G
G
Y
TRANSECT 71
100 200 300 400
DISTANCE (FEET)
PROJECT TITLE.• CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DATUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPAREDBY- MOFFATT & NICHOL
500
600
30
10 Q
Z
I—
w
w
V-
Z
O
0 a
w
J
Lu
-10
1
30
20
00
co
D
Q 10
Z
H
w
w
Z
O
H
> 0
w
J
Lu
P RED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE.' MAY 2018
10
-20
0
TRANSECT 72
100 200 300 400 500
DISTANCE (FEET)
SHEET TITLE-
RENOURISHMENT CROSS SECTIONS - TRANSECTS 71 AND 72
30
20
co
00
D
10 Q
Z
I—
LLI
W
LL
Z
O
H
0
w
J
w
-10
-20
600
SHEET
59
OF
61

30-
20-
co
0-
20co
Q
10-
z
F-
W
W
W
O
> o
Z J
W
-10
a
20
TRANSECT 73
I
j
4
(EXISTING GRADE BEMEL +6.0 �
BE M WIDTH - 43'
BA E FILL @ -- 32 CY/IFT
� I
MHW, EL +1.5
0 MLW, EL -2.3
100 200 300 400 500
DISTANCE (FEET)
r PRO✓ECT TITLE CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED BY-• MOFFATT & NICHOL
30
20
00
co
D
10 Q
Z
H
W
W
Z
O
0 j
W
J
W
-10
20
600
30
Q
co
co
Q 10
Z
H
W
W
LL
Z
O
0
W
J
W
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE.- MAY 2018
-20
0
TRANSECT 74
100 200 300 400
DISTANCE (FEET)
500
SHEET TI TLE.-
RENOURISHMENT CROSS SECTIONS - TRANSECTS 73 AND 74
30
20
00
10 Q
Z
H
W
W
4:
Z
O
0 >
W
J
W
Irk
-20
600
SHEET
60
F61Of -
61

30
TRANSECT 75
30
co
i
-10
100 200 300 400 500
DISTANCE (FEET)
PROJECT TITLE.- CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED B K MOFFATT & NICHOL
600
TRANSECT 76
30
20
co
W
O
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE.' MAY 2018
sit
20
co
co
BERM EL +6.0
Qlo
--
P ^
BASE FILL @ — 23 CY/FT
z
+—
r L; MHW, EL +1.5
H
W
�Z MLW, EL -2.3
c W
/
u-
I
i
O
a
o
>
z W
J
W
j
-10
r,
-20
0
u;
Y
Z
Q
O
CC
O
TRANSECT 75
30
co
i
-10
100 200 300 400 500
DISTANCE (FEET)
PROJECT TITLE.- CARTERET COUNTY,
BOGUE BANKS MASTER BEACH
NOURISHMENT PLAN - PROJECT 1
DA TUM: NAVD 88 (FT)
PREPARED B K MOFFATT & NICHOL
600
TRANSECT 76
30
20
co
W
O
PREPARED FOR: CARTERET COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
DA TE.' MAY 2018
sit
-20
0
100 200 300 400 500
DISTANCE (FEET)
SHEET TITLE.-
RENOURISHMENT CROSS SECTIONS - TRANSECTS 75 AND 76
30
20
00
D
-10
-20
600
SHEET
61
OF
61
A EXISTING GOADE
BERM EL +6.0
y
BERM WIDTH — 36'
P ^
BASE FILL @ — 23 CY/FT
+—
r L; MHW, EL +1.5
-
�Z MLW, EL -2.3
� a
/
i
I
i
-20
0
100 200 300 400 500
DISTANCE (FEET)
SHEET TITLE.-
RENOURISHMENT CROSS SECTIONS - TRANSECTS 75 AND 76
30
20
00
D
-10
-20
600
SHEET
61
OF
61