Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20160980 Ver 2_BPDP FINAL_w_Appendices_20171206Bank Parcel Development Plan Meadow Spring Mitigation Site Johnston County, North Carolina Neuse River Basin HUC 03020201 Prepared By: November 2017 Bank Sponsor: EBX-Neuse I, LLC, 302 Jefferson Street, Suite 110 Raleigh, NC 27605 919-829-9909 Meadow Spring Parcel Development Package Buffer/Nutrient Offset Site ii November 2017 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 3 1.1 Parcel Location ............................................................................................................................. 3 1.2 Parcel Overview............................................................................................................................ 3 2 PROJECT AREA – EXISTING CONDITIONS ............................................................................. 5 2.1 Physiography ................................................................................................................................ 5 2.2 Soils .............................................................................................................................................. 5 2.3 Existing Vegetation Communities ................................................................................................ 8 2.4 Wetlands ....................................................................................................................................... 8 2.5 Threatened and Endangered Species ............................................................................................ 9 2.6 Environmental and Cultural Constraints .................................................................................... 10 2.7 FEMA Floodplain/Floodway Mapping ...................................................................................... 10 3 RIPARIAN RESTORATION & ENHANCEMENT PLAN ........................................................ 10 3.1 Riparian Restoration and Enhancement Activities & Parcel Preparation .................................. 10 3.2 Planting Plan ............................................................................................................................... 11 3.3 Easement Boundaries and Fencing ............................................................................................. 12 4 MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE PLAN ........................................................................... 12 4.1 Monitoring Protocol and Success Criteria .................................................................................. 12 4.2 Adaptive Management Plan and Parcel Maintenance ................................................................ 12 4.3 Long Term Management Plan .................................................................................................... 13 5 FINANCIAL ASSURANCE ............................................................................................................ 13 6 MITIGATION POTENTIAL .......................................................................................................... 13 7 CREDIT RELEASE SCHEDULE FOR MEADOW SPRING .................................................... 15 8 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................. 16 APPENDIX Appendix A– Supporting Figures Figure 1. Service Area Map Figure 2. Project Vicinity Map Figure 3. Existing Conditions Figure 4. Conceptual Design Plan for Stream Mitigation and Wetland Restoration/Enhancement Bank Site Figure 5. Riparian Buffer Conceptual Design and Credit Determination Map in BPDP Crediting Area Figure 6. USGS Topographic Map Figure 7. Soils Map Figure 8. National Wetlands Inventory Map Figure 9. FEMA Map Appendix B– Correspondence Appendix C– Conservation Easement and Plat Appendix D – Existing Conditions Photos (October 6, 2015) Meadow Spring Parcel Development Package Buffer/Nutrient Offset Site 3 November 2017 1 INTRODUCTION EBX–Neuse I, LLC (EBX), an entity of Resource Environmental Solutions (RES), is pleased to provide this Bank Parcel Development Plan (BPDP) for the Meadow Spring Riparian Buffer & Nutrient Offset Mitigation Bank (“Parcel”). This Parcel is designed to provide riparian buffer mitigation credits for unavoidable impacts due to development within the Neuse River Basin, United States Geological Survey (USGS) 8-digit Hydrologic Unit Code (HUC – 03020201). In addition, it will also provide nutrient offset credits in the 03020201 HUC, excluding the Falls Lake Watershed, for existing and proposed development requiring such mitigation (Figure 1). This BPDP is in accordance with the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295, 15A NCAC 02B.0240 and the RES Neuse Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument for Riparian Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Credits (UMBI), made and entered into by EBX-Neuse I, LLC acting as the Bank Sponsor (Sponsor), and the North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality-Division of Water Resources (DWR). Supporting figures can be found in Appendix A. The BPDP has also been designed in concurrence with Meadow Spring Stream Mitigation Site in the Neu-Con Stream and Wetland Umbrella Mitigation Bank (SAW# 2016-01989). The mitigation plan for the Meadow Spring Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank has been submitted and is in review with the Interagency Review Team (IRT). 1.1 Parcel Location The Meadow Spring Parcel is located in Johnston County approximately three miles north of Smithfield, North Carolina (Figure 2). The Parcel is located within Neuse River Basin USGS 14-digit HUC 03020201100050, a Targeted Local Watershed, and DWR Subbasin Number 03-04-02. To access the Site head East on NC 70 from the Town of Wilson Mills and turn right onto Wilson Mills Road and head south for approximately 1.5 miles. The coordinates of the site are 35.5437°N and - 78.3303°W. 1.2 Parcel Overview When combining the Meadow Spring Stream & Wetland Mitigation Bank with the Meadow Spring Buffer Mitigation and Nutrient Offset Bank, the conservation easement will total approximately 60.93 acres and includes one unnamed tributary to the Neuse River. The Parcel is located in an area dominated by agricultural fields, cattle pastures and wooded areas. The majority of the Parcel is actively grazed pasture and disturbed riparian forest. Additional land use practices including the maintenance and removal of riparian vegetation and the relocation, dredging and straightening of onsite streams has resulted in degraded water quality and unstable channel characteristics. The Parcel also contains an agricultural pond has been in place for over 40 years. The Meadow Spring Stream Mitigation Site is proposed to provide stream enhancement and restoration on approximately 7,393 linear feet of streams and wetland restoration and enhancement on approximately 36.53 acres of wetlands, to generate 17.02 wetland mitigation units, within the conservation easement through a separate mitigation banking instrument with the IRT. RES does not plan to convert any wetland mitigation credits to buffer or nutrient credit. Figure 3 shows the existing stream channel and Figure 4 shows the proposed stream channel designs for the stream mitigation bank. Restoration and enhancement of the Neuse riparian buffer (as defined in 15A NCAC 02B .0233) and other riparian areas onsite are anticipated to result in immediate water quality benefits within the vicinity Meadow Spring Parcel Development Package Buffer/Nutrient Offset Site 4 November 2017 of the Parcel and will include the removal of livestock access to Parcel streams and reduction in nutrient loads from agricultural land-uses. The riparian restoration activities within the Parcel will also result in improved water quality within the downstream watershed. The easement is separated by an existing power easement and three agricultural crossing. The project is divided into an upper and lower portion by the existing power easement. The upper portion of the project includes reaches S1, S2, S4, S5, S6A and S6B. The lower portion of the project includes reaches S7, S9, S11, S12 and S13. Stream identifications were verified by the DWR site visit on August, 17 2016. Correspondence regarding this determination is in Appendix B. The drainage area of the Parcel is approximately 0.59 mi². The BPDP will only generate credit in the northern portion of the easement above the utility line (Figure 5). The Meadow Spring Bank Parcel is being proposed to restore and enhance stream systems with their adjacent riparian buffers and their functions and values to compensate, in appropriate circumstances, for unavoidable riparian buffer impacts and nutrient load reduction requirements. The buffer mitigation plan proposed on this Bank is being submitted for review under the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 as well as conditions specified in the RES Neuse Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Mitigation Banking Instrument. DWR staff performed an onsite viability assessment for buffer mitigation and nutrient offset on October 18, 2016. Correspondence regarding this assessment is provided in Appendix B and dated November 4, 2016. For purposes of the Meadow Spring Nutrient Offset & Buffer Bank, the Parcel involves restoring riparian buffers and other riparian areas adjacent to mitigated streams onsite. All the riparian areas were assessed by DWR during an onsite visit to determine viability for buffer mitigation and nutrient offset. During the site visit and noted in the letter dated September 1, 2016, all riparian areas adjacent to streams associated with the upper portion of this proposed bank were confirmed to have been in pasture for cattle grazing (Appendix B). This upper portion includes S2, S5 and S6 and will have approximately 20.68 acres protected with a permanent conservation easement. Of those 20.68 acres, 4.58 acres will be restored for Neuse riparian buffer credit (which is also viable to generate nutrient credit), 1.57 acres will be restored for nutrient offset credit (which is also viable to generate buffer credit), and 1.96 acres will be enhanced by the removal of cattle from the streams and riparian areas for Neuse riparian buffer credit only. The agricultural pond will be drained and incorporated into reach S6 to restore to the natural condition. In general, riparian restoration/enhancement area widths on streams will extend out to a maximum of 100 feet from the top of bank with a minimum width of 50 feet from top of banks. Riparian buffer enhancement credits generated on this Bank Parcel are allowed pursuant to 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6) but cannot be used to generate nutrient offset credits. Additionally, no riparian restoration areas that are less than 50 feet wide from top of banks can be used to generate nutrient offset credit. Therefore, the maximum acreage of riparian restoration on this site that is able to be converted into nutrient offset credits if needed by RES, is 6.60 acres. Figure 5 shows the Credit Determination Map and Section 6.0 provides details of the mitigation determination on the Bank Parcel. Areas along reaches S7 and S9 within the project are being used to generate additional stream credit for the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). As shown on Figure 4, this area is solely being used for the generation of stream mitigation credits, and will not be used for the generation of stream Meadow Spring Parcel Development Package Buffer/Nutrient Offset Site 5 November 2017 mitigation credits, and will not be used for the generation of any other credit type (i.e. The same square foot of buffer cannot be used to generate wetland credit, nutrient offset credits or state buffer credits). 2 PROJECT AREA – EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.1 Physiography The Parcel is in the Rolling Coastal Plain Physiographic Province. Soils in the Coastal Plain region formed in sediment deposits several millions of years ago by the ocean and streams; however, the floodplains along the Neuse River consist of fairly recent deposits. These deposits are not as weathered as the sediments in the Coastal Plain region. The site is located on the Neuse River floodplain and has a gently rolling topography. Elevations range from 120 to 150 feet above mean sea level (NAD 27) based upon USGS topographic mapping (Figure 6). One unnamed tributary on the Meadow Spring Bank Parcel as well as overland flow of stormwater drain into the Neuse River. The Neuse River is classified by DWR as NSW. The NSW is a designation for nutrient sensitive waters – intended for waters needing additional nutrient management due to being subject to excessive growth of microscopic or macroscopic vegetation. Natural drainage patterns throughout the watershed have been altered by cultivation and dredging of the channels. Within the proposed mitigation area, the channels drain surface water and groundwater from the surrounding row crop agriculture and cattle pastures. Also, as shown on the Existing Conditions map (Figure 3), the construction of a farm pond has altered surface drainage and placed spoil across the floodplain. 2.2 Soils The soils within the Rolling Coastal Plain region of Johnston County formed in sediments deposited several million years ago by the oceans and streams. The floodplains along the Neuse River consist of relatively recent deposits of sediments that are not as highly weathered as sediments in the Coastal Plain Region. Much of the county is well drained; however, several areas are poorly drained. The Parcel is located within the Wehadkee-Bibb-Chewacla soil association. The Wehadkee-Bibb-Chewacla soil association is located along major streams and creeks throughout Johnston County. The largest mapped area of this soils association is along the Neuse River south of Smithfield. The soils range from well to poorly drained. This soil association is located along major streams and creeks throughout Johnston County. The largest mapped area of this soils association is along the Neuse River south of Smithfield. The Johnston County Soil Survey shows several mapping units across the project site. Map units include eleven soil series (Figure 7). The upland soils found in this area of the county formed in sandy sediments from marine and fluviomarine deposits, loamy alluvium, or clayey Coastal Plain sediments. The upland soils at this site are on a river terrace above the active floodplain. The soil series found on the site are described below and summarized in Table 1. Meadow Spring Parcel Development Package Buffer/Nutrient Offset Site 6 November 2017 Table 1. Parcel Mapped Soil Series Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Percent Hydric Drainage Class Hydrologic Soil Group Landscape Setting AaA Altavista fine sandy loam, 0-2% slopes 9% Moderately well C Stream terraces AsA Augusta sandy loam, 0-2% slopes 7% Somewhat poorly B/D Stream terraces Bb Bibb sandy loam, 0- 2% slopes 90% Poorly A/D Floodplains GoA Goldsboro sandy loam, 0-2% slopes 2% Moderately well B Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces McB Marlboro-Cecil complex, 2-8% slopes 0% Well B Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, ridges on marine terraces NoA Norfolk loamy sand, 0-2% slopes 5% Well A Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces NoB Norfolk loamy sand, 2-6% slopes 5% Well A Flats on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces Ra Rains sandy loam, 0- 2% slopes 90% Poorly B Carolina bays on marine terraces, broad interstream divides on marine terraces, flats on marine terraces Ro Roanoke loam, 0-2% slopes 100% Poorly C/D Depressions on stream terraces, backswamps on stream terraces WaB Wagram loamy sand, 0-6% slopes 5% Well A Broad interstream divides on marine terraces, ridges on marine terraces Altavista fine sandy loam. This is a very deep, moderately to well-drained soil that occurs on stream terraces of the Coastal Plain. They formed in old loamy alluvium derived from igneous and metamorphic rock, and generally occur on slopes between 0-3%. Runoff is negligible and permeability is moderate. Major uses are cropland. Altavista fine sandy loam occurs along the southeast boundary of the proposed easement throughout most the wetland area. Meadow Spring Parcel Development Package Buffer/Nutrient Offset Site 7 November 2017 Augusta sandy loam. This is a very deep, somewhat poorly drained soil that occurs on stream terraces of the Southern Piedmont and Upper Coastal Plain. They formed in loamy alluvial sediments, and generally occur on slopes between 0-2%. Runoff is negligible and permeability is moderate. Major us is cropland. Augusta sandy loam occurs along the northwest end of the of the planned wetland and near the southern reach of the stream. Bibb sandy loam. This is a very deep, poorly drained soil found on flood plains of the Coastal Plain. Slopes are generally less than 2%. Soils formed in stratified sandy alluvium and have very slow runoff with moderate permeability. The water table is generally within 8 inches of the surface for six to eleven months of the year. Bibb sandy loams occurs along the northernmost reach of the easement; it can also be found in small patches around the project Site. Goldsboro sandy loam. This is a very deep, moderate well-drained soil that occurs on marine terraces and uplands of the lower to upper Coastal Plain. They formed in marine and fluviomarine deposits, and generally occur on slopes between 0-10%. Runoff is negligible to medium and permeability is moderate. Major uses are cropland. Goldsboro sandy loam occurs along the middle of the easement and is scattered along the project vicinity. Marlboro- Cecil complex. Marlboro consists of very deep, well-drained soil that occurs on the smooth uplands of the Coastal Plain. They formed in clayey Coastal Plain sediments, and generally occur in slopes 0-15%. Runoff is medium and permeability is moderate. Major uses are cropland. Cecil consists of very deep, well-drained soil that occurs on ridges and side slopes of the Piedmont uplands. They formed in residuum weathered from felsic, igneous and high-grade metamorphic rocks of the Piedmont uplands, and generally occur on slopes between 0-25%. Runoff is medium to rapid and permeability is moderate. Major uses are cultivation, pasture, and forest. Marlboro-Cecil complex is found outside of the easement area in the surrounding cultivated plots. Norfolk loamy sand. This is a very deep, well-drained soil that occurs on interfluves and side slopes of the Coastal Plain. They formed in marine or fluviomarine deposits, and generally occur on slopes between 0-10%. Runoff is negligible to medium and permeability is moderate. Major uses are cropland. Norfolk loamy sand is found along the floodplains of the northwestern stream reaches. Rains sandy loam. This is a very deep, poorly drained soil that occurs on crests of the Coastal Plain. They formed in loamy and sandy marine deposits, and generally occur on slopes between 0-2%. Runoff is low and permeability is moderate. Major uses are forest and cropland. Rains sandy loam occurs along the area just north of the easement and along the stream reaches extending out from the site easement. Roanoke loam. This is a very deep, poorly drained soil that occurs on terraces and drainageways of the piedmont and the upper and middle Coastal Plain. They formed in clayey fluvial sediments, and generally occur on slopes between 0-2%. Runoff and permeability are slow to very slow. Major uses are woodland. Roanoke loam occurs along the left floodplain of the southernmost reach of the conservation easement. Wagram loamy sand. This is a very deep, somewhat excessively drained soil that occurs on the interfluves and side slopes of the upper and middle Coastal Plain. The formed in marine and fluviomarine deposits, and generally occur on slopes between 0-15%. Runoff is negligible to medium Meadow Spring Parcel Development Package Buffer/Nutrient Offset Site 8 November 2017 and permeability is moderate. Major uses are cropland. Wagram loamy sand occurs along the right stream bank and floodplain of the northernmost reach in the easement. 2.3 Existing Vegetation Communities Current land use in the vicinity of the project is primarily actively grazed pasture and forest. There are low-density residential lots, maintained vegetation, and two lane roads also present in the area surrounding the project. The site viability letter from DWR in Appendix B provides details on land-uses within the riparian areas on the site. Forested riparian areas have been intermittently cattle-grazed and lack a well-developed understory and shrub strata. The areas most closely resemble a disturbed Coastal Plain small stream swamp and are dominated by hardwoods and loblolly pine (Pinus taeda). Canopy species include loblolly pine, blackgum (Nyssa biflora), red maple (Acer rubrum), sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), and various oaks (Quercus spp.). Sub-canopy species include sweet bay magnolia (Magnolia virginiana) and the main herbaceous species are giant cane (Arundinaria gigantea), Japanese stiltgrass (Microstegium vivenium), dogfennel (Eupatorium capillifolium) and in the wetter areas, soft rush (Juncus effusus), awlfruit sedge (Carex stipata), and netted chainfern (Woodwardia areolata). Riparian Vegetation The project consists of one unnamed tributary that runs through the project and drains directly to the Neuse River. In general, all or portions of the project reaches do not function to their full potential. Current conditions demonstrate significant habitat degradation as a result of impacts from agriculture, historic land uses, and water diversion. Having been channelized in the past, some of the streams do not access their floodplains as frequently as they naturally would have prior to agricultural operations. A farm pond has also altered surface drainage and placed spoil across the floodplain. The pond will be removed and restore the floodplain to its natural state. In most cases, the riparian buffer is in poor condition where much of the riparian buffer is devoid of trees or shrubs and active pasture is directly adjacent to both banks of the existing channel. Reach S6 has a dense privet providing full canopy that is expected to be treated and removed as part of stream restoration work. Habitat along the majority of the restoration reaches is poor in that there is little woody debris or overhanging vegetation for fish cover or protection for other aquatic species. 2.4 Wetlands The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetland Inventory Map (NWI) depicts three wetland areas within the site (Figure 8). There is a pond mapped as PUBHh (Palustrine Unconsolidated Bottom Permanently Flooded Diked/Impound) on the west end of the project. There are two large wetland areas mapped on the east end of the project as PSS1C (Palustrine Scrub-Shrub Broad- Leaved Deciduous Seasonally Flooded) and PFO1C (Palustrine Forested Broad-Leaved Deciduous Seasonally Flooded). A wetland delineation was performed in November 2016. Wetland boundaries were delineated using current methodology outlined in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual (DOA 1987) and Regional Supplement to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region (Version 2.0) (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 2010). A Meadow Spring Parcel Development Package Buffer/Nutrient Offset Site 9 November 2017 jurisdictional determination request was sent to the USACE on January 2, 2017. The jurisdictional wetland boundaries are depicted on Figure 3. As stated above and shown in Figure 4, wetland restoration and enhancement is being proposed on approximately 36.53 acres of wetlands, to generate 17.02 wetland mitigation units, through a separate mitigation banking instrument with the IRT. However, RES does not plan to convert any wetland mitigation credits to buffer or nutrient credit 2.5 Threatened and Endangered Species Plants and animals with a federal classification of endangered (E) or threatened (T) are protected under provisions of Sections 7 and 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. The USFWS database (accessed 11 May 2016) lists four endangered species for Johnston County, North Carolina: Red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), Tar River spinymussel (Elliptio steinstansana), Dwarf wedgemussel (Alasmidonta heterodon) and Michaux’s sumac (Rhus michauxii). The Bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) is protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGPA) and prohibits take of bald and golden eagles. No protected species or potential habitat for protected species was observed during preliminary site evaluations. In addition to the USFWS database, the NC Natural Heritage Program (NHP) GIS database was consulted to determine whether previously cataloged occurrences of protected species are mapped within one mile of the project Site. Results from NHP indicated that there are six known occurrences within a one-mile radius of the project area. The NHP database shows an occurrence of Kidney Sedge (Carex reniformis) historically mapped in 1949. Also within the Neuse River the database has documented occurrences of the Triangle floater (Alasmidonta undulata), Eastern lampmussel (Lampsilis radiate), and Roanoke slabshell (Elliptio roanokensis) which were mapped in 2005 and 2010. The fifth occurrence is the Two-spotted Skipper which is a species of butterfly. The occurrence was mapped on the other side of the Neuse River in 2000. The last occurrence is the Oak Toad which was last observed in 1969. Based on initial site investigations, no impacts to federally protected species are anticipated as a result of the proposed project. The proposed project offers some potential to greatly benefit the downstream water quality within the Upper Neuse sub-basin. A letter from the USFWS dated November 3, 2016 indicated that minimal adverse impacts to fish and wildlife resources are expected as part of the project and that the proposed project could greatly benefit the downstream water quality. USFWS encouraged the catching and removing of non-native fish that currently reside in the pond onsite that is proposed for removal, prior to breaching the dam and connecting this feature with the tributary system to reduce impacts to native aquatic species downstream. Documentation is included in Appendix B. Table 2. Federally Protected Species in Johnston County Common Name Scientific name Federal Status Habitat Present Record Status Vertebrate: Red-cockaded woodpecker Picoides borealis E No Current Bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus BGPA Yes Current Invertebrate: Tar River spinymussel Eliptio steinstansana E No Current Dwarf wedgemussel Alasmidonta heterodon) E No Current Meadow Spring Parcel Development Package Buffer/Nutrient Offset Site 10 November 2017 Common Name Scientific name Federal Status Habitat Present Record Status Vascular Plant: Michaux’s Sumac Rhus Michauxii E No Current E = Endangered; BGPA = Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act 2.6 Environmental and Cultural Constraints Environmental and cultural resources include historic and archeological resources located in or near the project parcel. RES has evaluated the Parcel’s existing and future conditions of cultural resources to determine potential project impacts. The evaluation focused primarily on the presence of hazardous materials, utilities and restrictive easements, rare/threatened/endangered species or critical habitats, cultural resources, and the potential for hydrologic trespass. A review of the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) GIS Web Service database did not reveal any listed or potentially eligible historic or archeological resources in the proposed project area. No architectural structures or archeological artifacts have been observed or noted during surveys of the site for restoration purposes. In a letter dated November 28, 2016, in response to the Public Notice for this project, the SHPO stated that they were, “aware of no historic resources which would be affected by the project”. Correspondence is provided in Appendix B. 2.7 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Floodplain/Floodway Mapping Reaches S7, S9, S11 and S12 are located within the FEMA 100-year floodplain (Zone AE) but outside of the floodway of the Neuse River (Figure 9). The adjacent land use will not be affected by the proposed design, and no detrimental impacts are expected beyond the easement limits. RES will verify final FEMA coordination in the permitting phase of the project. 3 RIPARIAN RESTORATION & ENHANCEMENT PLAN 3.1 Riparian Restoration and Enhancement Activities & Parcel Preparation The current land uses adjacent to the streams purposed for buffer restoration and enhancement are primarily composed of forested and non-forested pasture which are actively grazed by livestock. But also includes, row-crops, maintained lawns, and hardwood forests. Riparian restoration and enhancement adjacent to streams are shown in Figures 4 and 5, and were approved by the DWR in their letter dated November 4, 2016 and is attached in Appendix B. All restoration and enhancement activities will begin from the tops of the stream banks and extend outward a maximum of 200’ perpendicular to the stream channel. The restoration of plant communities within the Parcel will not only provide stabilization and improve water quality within the easement limits, but also provide ecological benefits to the entire watershed. Vegetation within riparian buffers can vary depending on disturbance regime and adjacent community types, so the protected buffer easement will be planted with appropriate native species observed in the surrounding forest and species known to occur in similar environments. In forested areas, the buffer restoration areas will be determined based on whether there are less than 25 percent of the tree canopy cover and a lack of dense growth of smaller woody stems (i.e. shrubs or saplings) and enhancement areas will be determined as being higher than 25 percent but lower than the what is deemed appropriate for the location in accordance with the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (b)(12), 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (b)(4). For ephemeral stream reach S4, buffer restoration will occur in the non-forested riparian area whereas buffer enhancement will occur in the forested areas (15A Meadow Spring Parcel Development Package Buffer/Nutrient Offset Site 11 November 2017 NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(7). All riparian restoration and enhancement activities will commence in concurrence with the stream mitigation activities and not before. Therefore, the mitigation area where riparian restoration is being performed may be altered slightly depending on the approval of the Stream Mitigation Plan for the Stream Mitigation Bank. Restoration activities based on the design approach will include meandering the proposed channel within the natural valley, backfilling the existing stream, reconnecting the channel to its floodplain, removing the existing dam embankment (the pond) and restoring hydrology to historically drained wetlands. Diffused flow will be maintained throughout the mitigated riparian areas. The riparian restoration areas will be surveyed and information will be provided in the As-Built report. Enhancement will also occur in areas of grazing adjacent to the stream in accordance with the Consolidated Buffer Mitigation Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295 (o)(6). Where livestock are present, RES will install cattle exclusion fencing to exclude access to riparian areas and their associated streams. All fencing will be installed to NRCS specifications. All riparian restoration areas will be planted from top of bank back at least 50’ from the stream with bare root tree seedlings on an 8 by 8-foot spacing to achieve an initial density of 680 trees per acre. The buffered channels will provide water quality and habitat functions within the sensitive Neuse River watershed, such as nutrient and sediment removal, filtration of runoff, and improved aquatic and terrestrial habitat. Some areas adjacent to the forested areas may require maintenance due to the rapid regeneration of some species, such as red maple (Acer rubrum) and sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua). 3.2 Planting Plan Revegetation of the site where riparian restoration is being performed will meet the performance standards outlined in the Rule 15A NCAC 02B .0295. This includes treating invasive species growth and planting at least 4 native hardwood bare root trees planted at a density to ensure a density of 260 stems per acres at the completion of monitoring. No one tree species will be greater than 50% of the established stems. Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp will be the target community type and will be used for all areas within the project. The community is defined by Schafale and Weakely (1990). The initial planting of bare root trees will occur in winter 2017 or during stream restoration work whichever comes last. Tree species specified for planting on the Meadow Spring Site are shown in Table 3. Table 3. Meadow Spring Site Tree Planting List Common Name Scientific Name Indicator Growth Rate Bald Cypress Taxodium distichum OBL rapid Black gum Nyssa biflora OBL moderate Oak, Overcup Quercus lyrata OBL moderate American sycamore Platanus occidentalis FACW rapid Oak, Swamp Chestnut Quercus michauxii FACW moderate Oak, Willow Quercus phellos FACW rapid River Birch Betula nigra FACW rapid Pawpaw Asimina tribola FAC moderate Meadow Spring Parcel Development Package Buffer/Nutrient Offset Site 12 November 2017 3.3 Easement Boundaries and Fencing Easement boundaries will be identified in the field to ensure clear distinction between the Parcel and adjacent properties. Boundaries may be identified by cattle fence, marker, bollard, post, tree-blazing, or other means as allowed by site conditions and/or conservation easement. Boundary markers disturbed, damaged, or destroyed will be repaired and/or replaced on an as needed basis. The easement boundary will be checked annually as part of monitoring activities and the conditions as well as any maintenance performed will be reported in the annual monitoring reports to DWR. 4 MONITORING AND MAINTENANCE PLAN 4.1 Monitoring Protocol and Success Criteria Riparian buffer vegetation monitoring will be based on the CVS-EEP Protocol for Recording Vegetation Level 1-2 Plot Sampling Only Version 4.0. Annual vegetation monitoring will occur each year for a minimum of five (5) years and will be conducted during the fall season with the first year occurring at least 5 months from initial planting. As part of the stream mitigation plan, nineteen monitoring plots will be installed a minimum of 100 m2 in size, and will cover at least two percent of the planted mitigation area for the Stream Mitigation Bank, seven of these plots will be randomly placed throughout the planted riparian buffer and nutrient offset mitigation area and will be representative of the riparian buffer restoration areas. And eleven of these plots will be placed within areas where RES is seeking wetland restoration. There will be plots within the riparian buffer that are measuring success of both the riparian area and the wetland areas. Those measuring success of just the buffer areas where buffer credit is being sought, will be provided in the Monitoring reports. The following data will be recorded for all trees in the plots: species, height, planting date (or volunteer), and grid location. All stems in plots will be flagged with flagging tape. Photos will be taken from all photo points each monitoring year and provided in the annual reports. Visual inspections and photos will be taken to ensure that enhancement areas are being maintained and compliant. The measures of vegetative success for the Parcel will be the survival of at least 4 native hardwood tree species, where no one species is greater than 50% of the established stems, established at a density of at least 260 planted trees per acre at the end of Year 5. Native volunteer species may be included to meet the performance standards as determined by DWR. Invasive and noxious species will be monitored and controlled so that none become dominant or alter the desired community structure of the site. RES must monitor the stream mitigation bank for a minimum of seven years, or until IRT approval. Therefore, plots placed within riparian restoration areas that are outside of the mitigation area for buffer and nutrient offset credits will be monitored in accordance with the monitoring protocol in the Meadow Spring Stream Mitigation Plan. 4.2 Adaptive Management Plan and Parcel Maintenance Adaptive measures will be developed or appropriate remedial actions taken if in the event that the site, or a specific component of the site, fails to achieve the defined success criteria. Remedial actions will be designed to achieve the success criteria specified in this BPDP, and will include identification of the causes of failure, remedial design approach, work schedule, and monitoring criteria that will take into account physical and climatic conditions. Meadow Spring Parcel Development Package Buffer/Nutrient Offset Site 13 November 2017 Initial plant maintenance may include a one-time mowing, prior to initial planting to remove undesirable species. If mowing is deemed necessary by RES during the monitoring period, RES must receive approval by the DWR prior to any mowing activities to ensure that no buffer violations have been performed. Failure to receive approval to mow within the Neuse buffer, as defined in 15A NCAC 02B .0233, by the DWR could result in Neuse buffer violations and violations of the conservation easement. If necessary, RES will develop a species-specific control plan. 4.3 Long Term Management Plan EBX–Neuse I, LLC (EBX), acting as the Bank Sponsor, will record a Conservation Easement with the Johnston County Register of Deeds Office for this site. The Conservation Easement will be assigned to the North Carolina Wildlife Habitat Foundation (NCWHF). All monitoring activities, including periodic inspections of the site to ensure that restrictions required in the Conservation Easement are upheld, are the responsibility of EBX-Neuse I, LLC until the Bank Parcel is transferred to the NCWHF. Endowment funds required to uphold the Meadow Spring Bank Parcel conservation easement in perpetuity shall be negotiated prior to site transfer to the NCWHF. The Bank Sponsor will ensure that the Conservation Easement has allowed for the implementation of an initial monitoring phase, which will be developed during the design phase and conducted by the Bank Sponsor. The Conservation Easement will allow for yearly monitoring and, if necessary, maintenance of the Site during the initial monitoring phase. These activities will be conducted in accordance with the terms and conditions of the RES Neuse Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Umbrella Mitigation Banking Instrument made and entered into by EBX-Neuse I, LLC and DWR. 5 FINANCIAL ASSURANCE The Sponsor will provide financial assurances in the form of Performance Bonds sufficient to assure one-hundred percent (100%) completion of all mitigation work, required reporting and monitoring, and any remedial work required. Financial assurances will be payable at the direction of the DWR to its designee or to a standby trust. Financial assurances structured to provide funds to the DWR in the event of default by the Bank Sponsor are not acceptable. The initial performance bond will be in the amount of at least $150,000 and shall be able to cover 100% of the costs associated with construction of the riparian restoration areas. The monitoring bond shall be in the amount of at least $100,000 and shall be able to cover 100% of the costs associated with the monitoring and maintenance of the riparian restoration areas for five years. Performance bonds for monitoring shall be renewed to cover the next years monitoring period, with confirmation of renewal provided to DWR with each annual monitoring report when applicable. DWR reserves the right to alter the credit release schedule if monitoring reports are submitted without proof of bond renewals when applicable. 6 MITIGATION POTENTIAL The Meadow Spring Mitigation Bank presents 60.93 acres of permanent conservation easement in Johnston County, North Carolina. While this easement also encompasses areas for the Meadow Spring Stream and Wetland Mitigation Bank, the purpose of the Meadow Spring Buffer & Nutrient Offset Bank Meadow Spring Parcel Development Package Buffer/Nutrient Offset Site 14 November 2017 is to generate Neuse riparian buffer mitigation and nutrient offset credits. Once finalized a conservation easement and final recorded plat are provided in Appendix C. The width of the buffer/nutrient credit generation area will begin at the most landward limit of the top of bank or the rooted herbaceous vegetation and extend landward to a distance of 200 feet. Wetland mitigation is also being generated throughout the Site. There will be no overlap of credit generation between wetland and riparian crediting areas. This Bank has the potential to generate approximately 4.58 acres (199,505 ft2) of riparian buffer restoration credits on existing non-forested pasture, 1.96 acres (29,621 ft2) of buffer enhancement credits, and 1.57 acres (3,568.64 lbs) of nitrogen nutrient offset credits. The riparian buffer mitigation credits generated will service Neuse buffer impacts within the USGS 8-digit HUC 03020201 of the Neuse River Basin. The Nitrogen nutrient offsets generated will service nutrient load reduction requirements where payments are authorized in 15A NCAC 02B .0240 within the USGS 8-digit HUC 03020201, excluding the Falls Lake Watershed. The Sponsor will maintain 3 credit ledgers. One ledger will account for buffer Restoration credits, one ledger will account for buffer Enhancement credits, and one will account for Nitrogen nutrient offset credits. All mitigation credit assets shall be shown on these credit ledgers. The total potential mitigation credits that the Meadow Spring Bank will generate are summarized in Table 4; Figure 5. Table 4. Meadow Spring Bank Parcel Credit Summary Riparian Buffer Credit Riparian Zone Credit Type Mitigation Type Acreage Credit per Acre (ft2) Ratio Mitigation Assets (ft2) 0-50' Riparian Buffer Restoration 2.07 43,560 1:1 90,169 Riparian Buffer Enhancement 0.73 43,560 1:2 15,899 51-100' Riparian Buffer Restoration 2.88 43,560 1:1 125,453 Riparian Buffer Enhancement 0.32 43,560 1:2 6,970 101- 200' Riparian Buffer Enhancement 0.91 43,560 1:6 6,607 Total Restoration 4.95 215,622 ft² Total Enhancement 1.96 29,476 ft² Nutrient Offset Credit Zone Credit Type Mitigation Type Acreage Credit Per Acre (lbs) Ratio Mitigation Assets (lbs) 0-100' Nitrogen Restoration 0 2,273.02 N/A 0.00 101- 200' Nitrogen Restoration 1.65 2,273.02 N/A 3,750.48 Total Nitrogen Offsets 1.65 3,750.48 lbs Meadow Spring Parcel Development Package Buffer/Nutrient Offset Site 15 November 2017 The Sponsor may use the 4.58 acres (199,505 ft2) of riparian restoration generated on the non-forested pasture for either Neuse riparian buffer credits or Nitrogen nutrient offset credits, but not both. The Sponsor must submit a written request and receive written approval from DWR prior to any credit conversions and transfers to the buffer and nutrient offset credit ledgers. With each conversion and transfer request submitted to the DWR, the Sponsor will provide all updated credit ledgers showing all transactions that have occurred up to the date of the request. 7 CREDIT RELEASE SCHEDULE FOR MEADOW SPRING Table 3.0 - Credit Release Schedule for Riparian Buffer and Nutrient Offset Credits Task Project Milestone % Credit Available for Sale 1 Instrument and BPDP Approved by DWR, Conservation Easement Recorded and Financial Assurance Posted 20 2 Mitigation Site Earthwork, Planting and Installation of Monitoring Devices Completed 20 3 Monitoring Financial Assurance Posted and Approval of As-Built Report 10 4 Monitoring Report #1: Approved by the DWR** 10 5 Monitoring Report #2: Approved by the DWR** 10 6 Monitoring Report #3: Approved by the DWR** 10 7 Item B (1) of Section X in this Instrument has been completed and approved by DWR. 5 No remaining credits will be released until the conservation easement has been assigned to an approved land trust or stewardship 8 Monitoring Report #4: Approved by the DWR** 5 9 Monitoring Report #5: Approved by the DWR** and final site visit by DWR has been conducted 10 Total 100% ** DWR Approval provided upon a determination that the site is meeting success criteria contained within this BPDP Meadow Spring Parcel Development Package Buffer/Nutrient Offset Site 16 November 2017 8 REFERENCES Environmental Laboratory. (1987). "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual," Technical Report Y-87-1, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR). 2009. “Neuse River Basinwide Water Quality Plan.” Division of Water Quality. http:// http://portal.ncdenr.org/web/wq/ps/bpu/basin/neuse/2009. (October 2013). NCDENR. 2010. “N.C. Wetland Assessment Method User Manual Version 4.1.” N.C. Wetland Functional Assessment Team. NC Environmental Management Commission. 2014. Rule 15A NCAC 02B.0295 - Mitigation Program Requirements for the Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Buffers. Schafale, M.P. and A.S. Weakley. 1990. Classification of the Natural Communities of North Carolina, Third Approximation. North Carolina Natural Heritage Program, Division of Parks and Recreation, NCDENR, Raleigh, NC. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region (Version 2.0), ed. J. S. Wakeley, R. W. Lichvar, and C. V. Noble. ERDC/EL TR-10-20. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center. APPENDIX Appendix A. Supporting Figures Figure 1. Service Area Map Figure 2. Project Vicinity Map Figure 3. Existing Conditions Figure 4. Conceptual Design Plan for Stream Mitigation and Wetland Restoration/Enhancement Bank Site Figure 5. Riparian Buffer Conceptual Design and Credit Determination Map in BPDP Crediting Area Figure 6. USGS Topographic Map Figure 7. Soils Map Figure 8. National Wetlands Inventory Map Figure 8. FEMA Map ^_ Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, EsriJapan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia,NGCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community 0 105 Miles Figure 1 - Service Area M ap Meadow Spring Mitigation Site Johnston County, North Carolina Legend Buffer Service Area - HUC 03020201 Nutrient Service Area - HUC 03020201 excluding Falls Lake Watershed ©Document Path: C:\Users\aprickett\Dropbox (RES)\@RES GIS\Projects\NC\Meadow Spring (bank site)\MXD\BPDP\Figure 1 - Service Area - MS.mxdMeadow Spring Mitigation Site Sources: Esri, HERE, DeLorme, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, EsriJapan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), MapmyIndia,NGCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community 0 21 Miles ©Document Path: C:\Users\aprickett\Dropbox (RES)\@RES GIS\Projects\NC\Meadow Spring (bank site)\MXD\BPDP\Figure 2 - Vicinity - MS.mxdLegend Proposed Easement TLW - 03020201100050 Meadow Spring Mitigation Site Latitude: 35.5437° N Longitude: -78.3303° W Figure 2 - Vicinity Map Meadow Spring Mitigation Site Johnston County, North Carolina S7 S6BS6A S 1 1 S 2 S9S4S1 S5S13 S8 S 1 2 NC Center for Geographic Information & Analysis 0 700350 Feet Legend Streams Ephemeral D rainage Ditches Existing Wetlands Existing Pond Proposed Easement - 60.93 Ac. ©Document Path: C:\Users\aprickett\Dropbox (RES)\@RES GIS\Projects\NC\Meadow Spring (bank site)\MXD\BPDP\Figure 3 - Existing - MS.mxdPowerlineEasement Figure 3 - Existing Conditions Map Meadow Spring Mitigation Site Johnston County, North Carolina WG W HWI WBWF-AWF-B WE WD S6A S7S11S9S 2 S 1 S13S5S12 S6B S7NCCGIA © 0 400200 Feet Figure 4 - 404 Mitigation Conceptual Johnston County, North Carolina REFERENCE 1.) Topographic imagery from U.S.G.S. 2.) Horizontal Datum is NAD83 UTM Z15N. 3.) The parcel data information/property boundaries depicted on this map is for prospect assessment purposes only. It is not to be used as final boundaries. Date: 11/8/2017 Drawn by: ATP Checked by: JRM Document Path: C:\Users\aprickett\Dropbox (RES)\@RES GIS\Projects\NC\Meadow Spring (bank site)\MXD\BPDP\Figure 4 - 404 Concept - MS -11x17.mxdLegend Proposed Easement Ditches (to be plugged) Top of Bank 100' 200'Stream Mitigation Restoration Enhancement I Enhancement IIEnhancement III PreservationWetland Mitigation Re-establishment, 1:1 Re-establishment, 2:1 Rehabilitation, 1.5:1 Enhancement, 3:1 Preservation, No Credit S6B S6A S 2 S4S 1 S50 300150 Feet Figure 5 - Buffer Conceptual Design Meadow Spring Mitigation Site Johnston County, North Carolina ©Document Path: C:\Users\aprickett\Dropbox (RES)\@RES GIS\Projects\NC\Meadow Spring (bank site)\MXD\BPDP\Figure 5 - Buffer Concept - MS.mxdLegend Proposed Easem entProposed Wetland MitigationTop of Ba nk O ffset sTop of Bank50'100'200'Buffe r Cre ditingBuffer Restoration (0-50')Buffer Restoration (51-100')Buffer Enhancement (0-50')Buffer Enhancement (51-100')Buffer Enhancement (101-200')Nutrient O ffset (0-100')Nutrient O ffset (101-200') BPDP Crediting Area Riparian Zone Credit Type Mitigation Type Acreage Credit per Acre Ratio Mitigation Assets (ft2) Ripari an Buffer Restoration 2.07 43,560 1:1 90,169 Ripari an Buffer Enhance me nt 0.73 43,560 1:2 15,899 Ripari an Buffer Restoration 2.88 43,560 1:1 125,453 Ripari an Buffer Enhance me nt 0.32 43,560 1:2 6,970 101-200'Ripari an Buffer Enhance me nt 0.91 43,560 1:6 6,607 4.951.96 Zone Credit Type Mitigation Type Acreage Credit Per Acre (lbs)Ratio Mitigation Assets (lbs) 0-100'Nitrogen Re storati on 0 2,273.02 N/A 0.00 101-200'Nitrogen Re storati on 1.65 2,273.02 N/A 3,750.481.65 Nutrient Offset Cre dit Riparian Buffer Credit Total Nitroge n Offsets 3,750.48 lbs 51-100' Total RestorationTotal Enhanceme nt 215,622 ft²29,476 ft² 0-50' Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed 0 2,0001,000 Feet Legend Proposed Easement - 60.93 Ac. Target Parcels ©Document Path: C:\Users\aprickett\Dropbox (RES)\@RES GIS\Projects\NC\Meadow Spring (bank site)\MXD\BPDP\Figure 6 - USGS - MS.mxdFigure 6 - USGS Map Meadow Spring Mitigation Site Johnston County, North Carolina NoA Ch NoB NoB AsA NoA Bb AsA NnD NoB McB NoA AaA Ro NoB AuA To NoB NnE Ra NnD Ra Ra NoB NoA WaB NoA NoA WaB GoA NoA Ra CoB Ra GoA GoA NnD CeB Bb GeB Ra W GoA Ch NoA BnA W W W Ch W VrA GoA Ch NC Center for Geographic Information & Analysis 0 700350 Feet Le ge nd Proposed Easement - 60.93 Ac. Non-hydric Soil Soil with Hydric Inclusions Hydric Soil Water ©Document Path: C:\Users\aprickett\Dropbox (RES)\@RES GIS\Projects\NC\Meadow Spring (bank site)\MXD\BPDP\Figure 7 - Soils - MS.mxdFigure 7 - Soils Map Meadow Spring Mitigation Site Johnston County, North Carolina PSS1C PFO1C PSS1C PFO1F PFO1C PFO1C PFO1C PSS1FPUBHh R2UBH PFO1A PFO1C R2UBH PFO1C PUBHh PFO1F PFO1A PSS1C PUBHx PUBHh PFO1A PFO1C Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS,USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community 0 700350 Feet Legend Proposed Easement - 60.93 Ac. Existing Streams NWI Wetlands ©Document Path: C:\Users\aprickett\Dropbox (RES)\@RES GIS\Projects\NC\Meadow Spring (bank site)\MXD\BPDP\Figure 8 - NWI - MS.mxdFigure 8 - National W etlands Inventory Map Meadow Spring Mitigation Site Johnston County, North Carolina Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS,USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community 0 700350 Feet Legend Proposed Easement - 60.93 Ac. FEMA Zone AE, Floodway FEMA Zone AE, 100 Yr. Floodplain ©Document Path: C:\Users\aprickett\Dropbox (RES)\@RES GIS\Projects\NC\Meadow Spring (bank site)\MXD\BPDP\Figure 9 - FEMA - MS.mxdFigure 9 - FEMA Map Meadow Spring Mitigation Site Johnston County, North Carolina Appendix B. Correspondence Appendix C. Conservation Easement and Plat Note: This appendix will be updated as the easement deeds and plats become available. MODEL CONSERVATION EASEMENT January 18, 2001 Rev’d October 16, 2002 Rev’d August, 2003 Model Conservation Easement for use in preserving mitigation property. Language in italics is instructional, and should be deleted when site-specific Conservation Easement is prepared. PERMANENT CONSERVATION EASEMENT THIS CONSERVATION EASEMENT (“Conservation Easement”) made this ____ day of __________________, 200_ by and between ________________________, (“Grantor”) and ____________________________________ (Grantee). The designation Grantor and Grantee as used herein shall include said parties, their heirs, successors and assigns, and shall include singular, plural, masculine, feminine or neuter as required by context. RECITALS WHEREAS, Grantor owns in fee simple certain real property situated, lying and being in _______________________ County, North Carolina, more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein (“Property”); WHEREAS, Grantee is [either a public body of this state, an agency of the United States, or a nonprofit corporation or trust whose purpose is the conservation of property], and is qualified to be the Grantee of a conservation easement pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-35; WHEREAS, Grantor and Grantee recognize the conservation, scenic, natural, or aesthetic value of the property in its natural state, which includes the following natural communities: [describe by wetland and/or stream type, as well as any associated buffers or upland communities]. The purpose of this Conservation Easement is to maintain wetland and/or riparian resources and other natural values of the Property, and prevent the use or development of the Property for any purpose or in any manner that would conflict with the maintenance of the Property in its natural condition. [ For use when the mitigation is offered for impacts of a single individual or general permit use] WHEREAS, the preservation of the Property is a condition of Department of the Army permit Action ID ______________ issued by the Wilmington District Corps of Engineers, required to mitigate for unavoidable stream and/or wetland impacts authorized by that permit. Grantor and Grantee agree that third-party rights of enforcement shall be held by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps, to include any successor agencies), and that these rights are in addition to, and do not limit, the rights of enforcement under said permit. [Alternate paragraph for use when the conservation easement supports a mitigation bank] WHEREAS, the preservation of the Property is required by a Mitigation Banking Instrument for the [Name of Bank], Department of the Army Action ID [Action ID number for the mitigation bank]. The Mitigation Bank is intended to be used to compensate for unavoidable stream and/or wetland impacts authorized by permits issued by the Department of the Army. Grantor and Grantee agree that third-party rights of enforcement shall be held by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps, to include any successor agencies), and that these rights are in addition to, and do not limit, the rights of the parties to the Mitigation Banking Instrument. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the covenants and representations contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and legal sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, Grantor hereby unconditionally and irrevocably grants and conveys unto Grantee, its heirs, successors and assigns, forever and in perpetuity a Conservation Easement of the nature and character and to the extent hereinafter set forth, over the Property described on Exhibit A, together with the right to preserve and protect the conservation values thereof, as follows: ARTICLE I. DURATION OF EASEMENT This Conservation Easement shall be perpetual. This conservation Easement is an easement in gross, runs with the land and is enforceable by Grantee against Grantor, Grantor’s personal representatives, heirs, successors and assigns, lessees, agents and licensees. ARTICLE II. PROHIBITED AND RESTRICTED ACTIVITIES Any activity on, or use of, the Property inconsistent with the purpose of this Conservation Easement is prohibited. The Property shall be preserved in its natural condition and restricted from any development that would impair or interfere with the conservation values of the Property. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the following activities and uses are expressly prohibited, restricted or reserved as indicated hereunder: A. Disturbance of Natural Features. Any change disturbance, alteration or impairment of the natural features of the Property or any introduction of non-native plants and/or animal species is prohibited. B. Construction. There shall be no constructing or placing of any building, mobile home, asphalt or concrete pavement, billboard or other advertising display, antenna, utility pole, tower, conduit, line, pier, landing, dock or any other temporary or permanent structure or facility on or above the Property. C. Industrial, Commercial and Residential Use. Industrial, residential and/or commercial activities, including any right of passage for such purposes are prohibited. D. Agricultural, Grazing and Horticultural Use. Agricultural, grazing, animal husbandry, and horticultural use of the Property are prohibited. E. Vegetation. There shall be no removal, burning, destruction, harming, cutting or mowing of trees, shrubs, or other vegetation on the Property. F. Roads and Trails. There shall be no construction of roads, trails or walkways on the property; nor enlargement or modification to existing roads, trails or walkways. G. Signage. No signs shall be permitted on or over the Property, except the posting of no trespassing signs, signs identifying the conservation values of the Property, signs giving directions or proscribing rules and regulations for the use of the Property and/or signs identifying the Grantor as owner of the property. H. Dumping or Storage. Dumping or storage of soil, trash, ashes, garbage, waste, abandoned vehicles, appliances, machinery or hazardous substances, or toxic or hazardous waste, or any placement of underground or aboveground storage tanks or other materials on the Property is prohibited. I. Excavation, Dredging or Mineral Use. There shall be no grading, filling, excavation, dredging, mining or drilling; no removal of topsoil, sand, gravel, rock, peat, minerals or other materials, and no change in the topography of the land in any manner on the Property, except to restore natural topography or drainage patterns. J. Water Quality and Drainage Pattern. There shall be no diking, draining, dredging, channeling, filling, leveling, pumping, impounding or related activities, or altering or tampering with water control structures or devices, or disruption or alteration of the restored, enhanced, or created drainage patterns. In addition, diverting or causing or permitting the diversion of surface or underground water into, within or out of the easement area by any means, removal of wetlands, polluting or discharging into waters, springs, seeps, or wetlands, or use of pesticide or biocides is prohibited. K. Development Rights. No development rights that have been encumbered or extinguished by this Conservation Easement shall be transferred pursuant to a transferable development rights scheme or cluster development arrangement or otherwise. L. Vehicles. The operation of mechanized vehicles, including, but not limited to, motorcycles, dirt bikes, all-terrain vehicles, cars and trucks is prohibited. [The Corps will generally allow the use of vehicles on existing roads provided those roads are identified by reference to a recorded map showing their location, configuration, and size.] M. Other Prohibitions. Any other use of, or activity on, the Property which is or may become inconsistent with the purposes of this grant, the preservation of the Property substantially in its natural condition, or the protection of its environmental systems, is prohibited. ARTICLE III GRANTOR’S RESEVERED RIGHTS The Grantor expressly reserves for himself, his personal representatives, heirs, successors or assigns, the right to continue the use of the property for all purposes not inconsistent with this Conservation Easement, including, but not limited to, the right to quiet enjoyment of the Property, the rights of ingress and egress, the right to hunt, fish, and hike on the Property, the right to sell, transfer, gift or otherwise convey the Property, in whole or in part, provided such sale, transfer or gift conveyance is subject to the terms of, and shall specifically reference, this Conservation Easement. [For use when mitigation work (approved or required restoration, creation, or enhancement)is to be done on the property]Notwithstanding the foregoing Restrictions, Grantor reserves for Grantor, its successors and assigns, the right to construct wetland and stream mitigation on the Property, in accordance with the [describe mitigation plan by title, date and permit action id if a single mitigation site; if a mitigation bank, include the language “detailed mitigation plan approved in accordance with the Mitigation Banking Instrument for the__________________________________Mitigation Bank.] ARTICLE IV. GRANTEE’S RIGHTS The Grantee or its authorized representatives, successors and assigns, and the Corps, shall have the right to enter the Property at all reasonable times for the purpose of inspecting said property to determine if the Grantor, or his personal representatives, heirs, successors, or assigns, is complying with the terms, conditions, restrictions, and purposes of this Conservation Easement. The Grantee shall also have the right to enter and go upon the Property for purposes of making scientific or educational observations and studies, and taking samples. The easement rights granted herein do not include public access rights. ARTICLE V ENFORCEMENT AND REMEDIES A. To accomplish the purposes of this Easement, Grantee is allowed to prevent any activity on or use of the Property that is inconsistent with the purposes of this Easement and to require the restoration of such areas or features of the Property that may be damaged by such activity or use. Upon any breach of the terms of this Conservation Easement by Grantor that comes to the attention of the Grantee, the Grantee shall notify the Grantor in writing of such breach. The Grantor shall have 30 days after receipt of such notice to correct the conditions constituting such breach. If the breach remains uncured after 30 days, the Grantee may enforce this Conservation Easement by appropriate legal proceedings including damages, injunctive and other relief. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Grantee reserves the immediate right, without notice, to obtain a temporary restraining order, injunctive or other appropriate relief if the breach of the term of this Conservation Easement is or would irreversibly or otherwise materially impair the benefits to be derived from this Conservation Easement. The Grantor and Grantee acknowledge that under such circumstances damage to the Grantee would be irreparable and remedies at law will be inadequate. The rights and remedies of the Grantee provided hereunder shall be in addition to, and not in lieu of, all other rights and remedies available to Grantee in connection with this Conservation Easement. The costs of a breach, correction or restoration, including the Grantee’s expenses, court costs, and attorneys’ fees, shall be paid by Grantor, provided Grantor is determined to be responsible for the breach. The Corps shall have the same right to enforce the terms and conditions of this easement as the Grantee. B. No failure on the part of the Grantee to enforce any covenant or provision hereof shall discharge or invalidate such covenant or any other covenant, condition, or provision hereof or affect the right to Grantee to enforce the same in the event of a subsequent breach or default. C. Nothing contained in this Conservation Easement shall be construed to entitle Grantee to bring any action against Grantor for any injury or change in the Property resulting from causes beyond the Grantor’s control, including, without limitation, fire, flood, storm, war, acts of God or third parties, except Grantor’s lessees or invitees; or from any prudent action taken in good faith by Grantor under emergency conditions to prevent, abate, or mitigate significant injury to life, damage to property or harm to the Property resulting from such causes. ARTICLE VI MISCELLANEOUS A. Warranty. Grantor warrants, covenants and represents that it owns the Property in fee simple, and that Grantor either owns all interests in the Property which may be impaired by the granting of this Conservation Easement or that there are no outstanding mortgages, tax liens, encumbrances, or other interests in the Property which have not been expressly subordinated to this Conservation Easement. Grantor further warrants that Grantee shall have the use of and enjoy all the benefits derived from and arising out of this Conservation Easement, and that Grantor will warrant and defend title to the Property against the claims of all persons. B. Subsequent Transfers. The Grantor agrees to incorporate the terms of this Conservation Easement in any deed or other legal instrument that transfers any interest in all or a portion of the Property. The Grantor agrees to provide written notice of such transfer at least thirty (30) days prior to the date of the transfer. The Grantor and Grantee agree that the terms of this Conservation Easement shall survive any merger of the fee and easement interests in the Property or any portion thereof and shall not be amended, modified or terminated without the prior written consent and approval of the Corps. C. Assignment. The parties recognize and agree that the benefits of this Conservation Easement are in gross and assignable provided, however that the Grantee hereby covenants and agrees, that in the event it transfers or assigns this Conservation Easement, the organization receiving the interest will be a qualified holder under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 121-34 et seq. and § 170(h) of the Internal Revenue Code, and the Grantee further covenants and agrees that the terms of the transfer or assignment will be such that the transferee or assignee will be required to continue in perpetuity the conservation purposes described in this document. D. Entire Agreement and Severability. This instrument sets forth the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the Conservation Easement and supersedes all prior discussions, negotiations, understandings or agreements relating to the Conservation Easement. If any provision is found to be void or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder shall continue in full force and effect. E. Obligations of Ownership. Grantor is responsible for any real estate taxes, assessments, fees, or charges levied upon the Property. Grantor shall keep the Property free of any liens or other encumbrances for obligations incurred by Grantor. Grantee shall not be responsible for any costs or liability of any kind related to the ownership, operation, insurance, upkeep, or maintenance of the Property, except as expressly provided herein. Nothing herein shall relieve the Grantor of the obligation to comply with federal, state or local laws, regulations and permits that may apply to the exercise of the Reserved Rights. F. Extinguishment. In the event that changed conditions render impossible the continued use of the Property for the conservation purposes, this Conservation Easement may only be extinguished, in whole or in part, by judicial proceeding. G. Eminent Domain. Whenever all or part of the Property is taken in the exercise of eminent domain so as to substantially abrogate the Restrictions imposed by this Conservation Easement, Grantor and Grantee shall join in appropriate actions at the time of such taking to recover the full value of the taking, and all incidental and direct damages due to the taking. H. Proceeds. This Conservation Easement constitutes a real property interest immediately vested in Grantee. In the event that all or a portion of this Property is sold, exchanged, or involuntarily converted following an extinguishment or the exercise of eminent domain, Grantee shall be entitled to the fair market value of this Conservation Easement. The parties stipulate that the fair market value of this Conservation Easement shall be determined by multiplying the fair market value of the Property unencumbered by this Conservation Easement (minus any increase in value after the date of this grant attributable to improvements) by the ratio of the value of this easement at the time of this grant to the value of the Property (without deduction for the value of this Conservation Easement) at the time of this grant. The values at the time of this grant shall be the values used, or which would have been used, to calculate a deduction for federal income tax purposes, pursuant to Section 170(h) of the Internal Revenue Code (whether eligible or ineligible for such a deduction). Grantee shall use its share of the proceeds in a manner consistent with the purposes of this Conservation Easement. I. Notification. Any notice, request for approval, or other communication required under this Conservation Easement shall be sent by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, to the following addresses (or such address as may be hereafter specified by notice pursuant to this paragraph): To Grantor: [Name, address and fax number] To Grantee: [Name, address and fax number] To the Corps: [Name, address and fax number] J. Failure of Grantee. If at any time Grantee is unable or fails to enforce this Conservation Easement, or if Grantee ceases to be a qualified grantee, and if within a reasonable period of time after the occurrence of one of these events Grantee fails to make an assignment pursuant to this Conservation Easement, then the Grantee’s interest shall become vested in another qualified grantee in accordance with an appropriate proceeding in a court of competent jurisdiction. K. Amendment. This Conservation Easement may be amended, but only in a writing signed by all parties hereto, and provided such amendment does not affect the qualification of this Conservation Easement or the status of the Grantee under any applicable laws, and is consistent with the conservation purposes of this grant. L. [For use if there is a document describing the current condition of the property. The language provided is applicable if there is a mitigation plan that accurately describes the current condition and uses of the property. If there is not such a plan, another document we agree is accurate and can be identified and is in our files can be referenced.]Present Condition of the Property. The wetlands, scenic, resource, environmental, and other natural characteristics of the Property, and its current use and state of improvement, are described in Section ___, Appendix B of the Mitigation Plan, dated ________________, prepared by Grantor and acknowledged by the Grantor and Grantee to be complete and accurate as of the date hereof. Both Grantor and Grantee have copies of this report. It will be used by the parties to assure that any future changes in the use of the Property will be consistent with the terms of this Conservation Easement. However, this report is not intended to preclude the use of other evidence to establish the present condition of the Property if there is a controversy over its use. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said rights and easements perpetually unto Grantee for the aforesaid purposes. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the Grantor has hereunto set his hand and seal, the day and year first above written. [Signatures of the Grantor and Grantee in appropriate form] Appendix D. Existing Conditions Photos (October 6, 2015) Appendix D. Existing Conditions Photos (October 6, 2015) Reach S1. 10/06/2015 Reach S1. 10/06/2015 Reach S2. 10/06/2015 Reach S2. 10/06/2015 Reach S3. 10/06/2015 Reach S4. 10/06/2015 Reach S5. 10/06/2015 Reach S6. 10/06/2015 Reach S6. 10/06/2015 General conditions along Reach S7. 10/06/2015 General channel conditions along Reach S7. 10/06/2015 Reach S8. 03/09/2015 Reach S9. 10/06/2015 Reach S9. 10/06/2015 Reach S10. 10/06/2015 Reach 11. 10/06/2015 Reach S12. 05/10/2016 Reach S13. 10/06/2015