20130267 Ver 1_More Info Received_20130408

r r'
13- o3.-t,I
MJ ENGINEERING GROUP
+[J
306 Commercial Drive — Suite B
Savannah, GA 31406
1912) 201 -1807
F. (912) 201 -1703
April 5, 2013
Ms. Karen Higgins
Wetlands, Buffers, Stormwater, Compliance and Permitting Unit
NCDENR — Water Quality Division
512 N. Salisbury Street
Raleigh, NC 27604
RE: COURTESY 401 NOTIFICATION
Construction and Repair to USARC
United States Army Reserve Center
Morehead City, Carteret County, NC
USARC Contract. No. W912HP -12 -C -0039
H +K Project No. 01000.002
Ms. Higgins,
Per your request, please find attached the Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) and supporting
information that was submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) — Wilmington, North
Carolina District for the use of Nationwide Permit — 03 (NWP -03) and General Permit 197800056 (GP -56)
for the proposed repairs and upgrades to existing bulkheads, piers and docks, and the addition of a new
dock at the U.S. Army Reserve Center ( USARC) Facility located in Morehead City, North Carolina. The
purpose of this project is to support the continued training and mission of Landing Craft Utility (LCU)
vessels by the U.S. Army. The project owner is the United States Army 81st Regional Support Command.
The project shall be managed by the USACE — Wilmington, North Carolina District. The construction
contract was awarded to OTAK Group, Inc. located in Yulee, Florida, and the engineer of record (EOR) is
H +K Engineering Group, LLC (H +K), and will be working on behalf of the OTAK.
Please note that Ms. Christine Wicker, the regulatory officer with the USACE - Wilmington division,
o approved this project using a "Letter of Permission" since the proposed dock foot prints are greater than
the allowable foot prints cited in NWP -03 and GP -56. However, the purpose of this public project is to
design and construct docks and piers in compliance with NWP -03 and GP -56, which also includes
compliance with Water Quality Certification 3883. Therefore, this letter and attached PCN application is
a courtesy 401 notification to the Division of Water Quality for the proposed improvements at the
USARC Facility.
The proposed maintenance and construction activities are covered in detail in the attached report. The
project will not adversely affect any wetlands, submerged aquatic vegetation, or navigation; nor will the
project include any dredging or fill activities. The project will require conformity with Section 401 under
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources' ( NCDENR) Water Quality

Courtesy 401 Notification US Army Corps Engineers — Wilmington, NC
Construction and Repair to USARC USARC Contract. No. W912HP -12 -C -0039
Morehead City, North Carolina April 5, 2013
Certification No. 3883. According to the conditions of Certification No. 3883, the proposed maintenance
and construction activities do not require written notification to NCDENR. However, this letter and
attachments serve as a courtesy notification. Sediment and erosion control (ES &C) practices must be in
full compliance with all NCDENR specifications. According to the local NCDENR, the proposed project is
a maintenance activity, and the proposed construction activities associated with land disturbance are
less than one -acre therefore not requiring ES &C plan approval or a temporary construction stormwater
NPDES permit, such as General Permit NCG010000.
Based on the submittal of this courtesy PCN application and all required information, on behalf of
USARC, we respectfully request that the proposed maintenance and construction activities are
authorized by DWQ under Water Quality Certification 3883. The project was designed and shall be
constructed in accordance with NP -03 and GP -56 and WQC 3883, although the required footprint
required a "Letter of Permission" from USACE since it was larger than the allowable footprint cited in
NWP -03 and GP -56. Thank you for your participation in this project and we look forward to your
concurrence. If you should have any additional concerns or comments, please feel free to contact the
owner at frank.d.eubanks.civ @mail.mil, or the engineer of record at mpoulios @hk- engr.com.
Sincerely,
Michael D. Poulios
Project Engineer
H +K Engineering Group
Enclosed: Supporting Information
PCN Form
CC: Joanee Steenhuis, DWQ Wilmington Regional Office, w/ attachments
Christine Wicker, USACE -SAW Regulatory Group, w/o attachments
John Kato, OTAK Group, w/o attachments
Frank Eubanks, USARC, w/o attachments)
Paul Sadowski, USACE —SAW, w/o attachments)
Page 2

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
HEADtIUARTERS, 81ST REGIONAL READINESS SUSTAINMENT COMMAND
1525 MARION AVENUE
FORT JACKSON, SOUTH CAROLINA 29207.8070
P"LYTO February 26, 2013
ATTEMN OF:
Directorate of Public Works
Ms. Christy Wicker
Regulatory Specialist
United States Army Corps of Engineers — Wilmington District
69 Darlington Ave
Wilmington, NC 28403
Subject: NWP -03 & GP 56 PCN APPLICATION, Construction and Repair to USARC, United
States Army Reserve Center, Morehead City, Carteret County, NC, USARC Contract. No.
W912HP -12 -C -0039, H +K Project No. J1100.001
Ms. Wicker,
Please find attached the Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) and supporting information
for the use of Nationwide Permit — 03 (NWP -03) and General Permit 197800056 (GP -56) for the
proposed repairs and upgrades to existing bulkheads, piers and docks, and the addition of a
new dock at the U.S. Army Reserve Center ( USARC) Facility located in Morehead City, North
Carolina. The purpose of this project is to support the continued training and mission of Landing
Craft Utility (LCU) vessels by the U.S. Army. The project owner is the United States Army 818t
Regional Support Command. The project shall be managed by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) — Wilmington, North Carolina District. The construction contract was
awarded to OTAK Group, Inc. located in Yulee, Florida, and the engineer of record (EOR) is
H +K Engineering Group, LLC (H +K), and will be working on behalf of the OTAK.
The proposed maintenance and construction activities are covered in detail in the attached
report. The project will not adversely affect any wetlands, submerged aquatic vegetation, or
navigation; nor will the project include any dredging or fill activities. The project will require
conformity with Section 401 under North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources' (NCDENR) Water Quality Certification No. 3883. According to the conditions of
Certification No. 3883, the proposed maintenance and construction activities do not require
written notification to NCDENR. However sediment and erosion control (ES &C) practices must
be in full compliance with all NCDENR specifications. According to the local NCDENR, the
proposed project is a maintenance activity, and the proposed construction activities associated
with land disturbance are less than one -acre therefore not requiring ES &C plan approval or a
temporary construction stormwater NPDES permit, such as General Permit NCG010000.
Based on the submittal of this GP -56 PCN application and all required information, the 81st
Regional Support Command respectfully requests that the proposed maintenance and
construction activities are authorized by USACE personnel pursuant to GP -56. Thank you for
your participation in this project and we look forward to your concurrence. I am forwarding
copies of this letter to John Kato, OTAK Group, Ronald Kolat, PE, H +K Engineering Group, and
Paul Sadowski, Savannah District, US Army Corps of Engineers. If you should have any

-2-
additional concerns or comments, please feel free to contact me at
[e-mail], or the engineer of record at mpoulios @hk- engr.com.
Sincerely,
Frank D. Eubanks, P.E.
Deputy Director
Enclosures

PREPARED FOR. PREPARED BY.•
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF
ENGINEERS, CHARLESTON DISCTRICT
a m �ENGINEERING GROUP
L81
H +K ENGINEERING GROUP, LLC
306 COMMERCIAL DRIVE, SUITE B
SAVANNAH, GA 31406
(912) 201 -1807
www.hk- engr.com
OTAK GROUP, INC.
96126 MOUNT ZION LOOP
YULEE, FL 32097
[phone]

GP -56 Supporting Information US Army Corps Engineers — Wilmington, NC
Construction and Repair to USARC USARC Contract. No. W912HP -12 -C -0039
Morehead City, North Carolina February 26, 2013
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Authorization ................................................................................................ ..............................1
2.0 Project Summary ......................................................................................... ..............................1
3.0 Existing Conditions and Proposed Repairs, Upgrades, & Additions ........................2
3.1. Proposed Repairs and Upgrades .............................................................. ............................... 3
3.1.1. Site Maintenance ....................................................................... ............................... 3
3.1.2. Existing Bulkheads No. 1 and No. 2 ........................................... ............................... 3
3.1.3. Existing LCU 1600 Pier ............................................................... ............................... 4
3.2. Proposed Additions .................................................................................. ............................... 5
3.2.1. East Dock Extension ................................................................... ............................... 5
3.2.2. New LCU 2000 Pier .................................................................... ............................... 6
4.0 GP -S6 Conformance .................................................................................... ..............................6
4.1. Exceptions to Special Conditions ............................................................. ............................... 7
4.2. Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification ....................... ............................... 7
4.3. Stormwater Management Plan ................................................................ ............................... 7
5.0 Resource Agency Coordination ............................................................... ..............................7
5.1. Local and County ...................................................................................... ............................... 8
5.2. NCDENR and NCDWQ ............................................................................... ............................... 8
5.3. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ................................................................... ............................... 8
5.4. Other ........................................................................................................ ............................... 8
6.0 Mitigation ....................................................................................................... ..............................9
7.0 Areas of Environmental Concern .......................................................... ............................... 9
IIT.0.0

GP -56 Supporting Information US Army Corps Engineers — Wilmington, NC
Construction and Repair to USARC USARC Contract. No. W912HP -12 -C -0039
Morehead City, North Carolina February 26, 2013
TABLES:
TABLE
1:
Summary of Proposed Construction Activities
TABLE
2:
Existing Bulkheads Maintenance and Repair and Schedule
TABLE
3:
Existing LCU 1600 Pier Maintenance and Repair Schedule
TABLE
4:
Existing East Dock Extension Maintenance and Repair and Schedule
TABLE
5:
New LCU 2000 Pier Construction Schedule
FIGURES:
FIGURE 1:
USGS Topo Map
FIGURE 2:
Aerial Site Map
FIGURE 3:
Civil Site Plan
FIGURE 4:
Structural Key Plan
FIGURE 5:
Bulkhead No. 1 Repair Plan
FIGURE 6:
Bulkhead No. 2 Repair Plan
FIGURE 7:
LCU 1600 Pier— Demolition Plan
FIGURE 8:
LCU 1600 Pier — Maintenance and Repair Plan
FIGURE 9:
East Dock — Proposed Extension Layout and Construction Plan
FIGURE 10:
LCU 2000 Pier— Proposed Layout and Construction Plan
FIGURE 11:
Miscellaneous Details
REFERENCES
1. USFWS — IPaC Natural Resources Reference Report
2. USFWS — Guidelines for Avoiding Impacts to the West Indian Manatee
3. NCDENR Marine Fisheries — Fishery Nursery Areas Map
ii IT. 0.0

GP -56 Supporting Information
Construction and Repair to USARC
Morehead City, North Carolina
1.0 Authorization
US Army Corps Engineers — Wilmington, NC
USARC Contract. No. W912HP -12 -C -0039
February 26, 2013
This notification requests authorization to perform maintenance and construction activities in waters of
the United States through the use of General (Regional) Permit No. 197800056 (GP -56). The purpose of
providing this supporting information is to document project compliance with the US Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) general and regional conditions of GP -56.
The proposed project will be constructed in conformance with the standards authorized by GP -56, with
the exception of Special Conditions (d) and (e), which state maximum dock widths and areas. The
proposed project will not require any excavation or filling in any estuarine waters, tidelands,
marshlands, or State -owned lakes, nor will the project adversely affect any wetlands, submerged aquatic
vegetation, or navigable channels.
The following sections provide a detailed description of the proposed repairs, existing conditions,
alternative analysis, resource agency coordination, mitigation, and effects to areas of environmental
concerns (AECs); as well as conformance with County and local land use plans, North Carolina's Coastal
Area Management Act and Dredge and Fill Law.
2.0 Project Summary
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Charleston District proposes to repair and upgrades existing
bulkheads, piers and docks, along with the addition of a new dock located at the U.S. Army Reserve
Center ( USARC) in Morehead City, North Carolina to support the continued training and mission of
Landing Craft Utility (LCU) vessels by the U.S. Army. The repair is proposed to be conducted as a single
event, with construction beginning in April 2013 and completed in 180 days. All work will be performed
in previously disturbed areas on the property site and within 400 ft waterward of the Mean High Water
(MHW) elevation in accordance with the recommendations and requirements of local, state, and federal
agencies including but not limited to Morehead City, Carteret County, USACE - Wilmington Division,
North Carolina Department of Environmental and Natural Resources (NCDENR), and U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (FWS). Proposed construction activities shall occur on land, and from shallow -draft
barges above water. No dredging is required. Best management practices shall be used during
construction to minimize impacts and reduce sedimentation and erosion. Table 1 presents the overall
scope of work and proposed maintenance and construction activities.
TABLE 1: Summary of Proposed Construction Activities
11Page
UANTITIES
EXISTING
FINAL
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
Stabilize exposed soil areas located in the
Site Maintenance of
2.5 Acre Yard
2.5 Acre Yard
2.5 -acre yard area with a 6" to 12" thick
Crushed Rock Yard
layer of run of crusher (R.O.C.) gravel
pavement and compacted fill.
Bulkhead Maintenance
900 LF
900 LF
Replace 380 L.F. of deteriorated concrete
bulkhead cap with similar concrete cap.
11Page

GP -56 Supporting Information US Army Corps Engineers — Wilmington, NC
Construction and Repair to USARC USARC Contract. No. W912HP -12 -C -0039
Morehead City, North Carolina February 26, 2013
ITEM
UANTITIES
DESCRIPTION
EXISTING
FINAL
LCU 1600 Pier
9 FT Wide
9 FT Wide
Demo existing timber decking, bracing,
bents, and piling. Replace with concrete
platforms and piling. Reuse existing
reinforced concrete mooring piers and
landing pads.
3,800 SF Deck
3,800 SF Deck
39 Bents
23 Bents
13 Mooring/
Landing Piers
13 Mooring/
Landing Piers
1 Landing Pad
1 Landing Pad
East Dock
6 Ft Wide
6 Ft Wide
Extend existing east dock with reinforced
concrete platform and additional
mooring pier.
210 SF Deck
420 SF Deck
1 Mooring Pier
1 Mooring Pier
New LCU 2000 Pier
Non Existent
9 FT Wide
Provide new dock for LCU 2000 vessels.
The dock will be of concrete construction
and require 44 new pre- stressed
concrete piling.
2,100 SF Deck
7 Bents and
6 Berthing/
Landing Piers
1 Landing Pad
Total Open Water impact
6,600 SF
10,050 SF
The proposed project shall increase total
open water dock area by 3,450 SF. This
includes all timber decking and concrete
piers and platforms over open water.
3.0 Existing Conditions and Proposed Repairs, Upgrades, & Additions
The USARC is located at 410 Fisher Street, Morehead City, North Carolina along the Newport River. The
facility is home port to several service landing craft vessels including the LCU 2000 class and LCM -8 class
"Mike Boats." The tide variation near the facility ranges from Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW) at EL -
2.09 NAVD88 to Mean Higher High Water (MHHW) at EL +1.40 NAVD88. The length of accessible
shoreline adjacent to the existing and proposed docks is approximately 1,600 L.F.; this does not account
for undisturbed shoreline located adjacent to marshlands, which shall not be impacted as part of this
project. The base flood elevation according to FEMA is at EL +6.0 NAVD88, Zone AE. The maximum
wave height near the facility is less than 3 ft during the 100 year flood event. A USGS Topo Map and
Aerial Site Map are included as Figures 1 and 2 respectively.
The project site consists of a training facility, shop facility, parking lot, boat ramp, bulk land storage
areas, two docks: the LCU 1600 Pier and East Dock, and two shore areas where piling was previously
driven and installed. A structural key plan identifying these features is included as Figure 3. Existing
features that will be repaired and /or upgraded by the proposed project include existing Bulkheads Nol
and No. 2, the LCU 1600 Pier, and the East Dock. New features to be constructed during this project are
the addition of the LCU 2000 East Dock. Also, site maintenance will occur to existing access roads and
bulk storage areas, which includes grading activities and the addition of crushed rock to stabilize and
return site to preexisting conditions. The following paragraphs present an overview of the proposed
21 Page

GP -56 Supporting Information US Army Corps Engineers — Wilmington, NC
Construction and Repair to USARC USARC Contract. No. W912HP -12 -C -0039
Morehead City, North Carolina February 26, 2013
repairs, upgrades, and additions by feature. Summary tables are included on each drawings attached in
the appendix.
3.1. Proposed Repairs and Upgrades
Existing features that will be repaired and /or upgraded by the proposed project include site
maintenance activities, repairing existing Bulkheads No.1 and No. 2, and repairing the LCU 1600 Pier.
3.1.1. Site Maintenance
The project site consists of an approximate 2.86 -acre yard area located between the facility buildings
and adjacent shoreline. This area is best described as a 2.09 -acre compacted soil area with existing
crushed rock drives and sparse vegetation, with the remaining 0.77 acres having an overgrown
vegetative cover. As a maintenance activity to occur along with the construction of new docks, it is
proposed to reestablish the 2.09 -acre crushed rock area by placing a new 6" to 12" layer of run of
crusher (R.O.C.) on the existing deteriorated crushed stone surface. No excessive grading or excavation
activities in this area shall occur; only the removal of sparse vegetation /existing surface, and placement
of a new crushed rock surface to return the area to existing conditions and grade.
For the 0.77 -acre vegetative area consisting of grasses and small shrubs, it is proposed to clear and grub
this area, and to place R.O.C. over 0.41 acres and to establish a grassed cover over the remaining 0.36
acres. The entire grassed area shall be graded to allow sheet flow to the adjacent river (as it currently
does). Due to the projects location, exposed soil areas shall immediately be grassed within the 7 -day
period as required by NCDENR. The purpose is to remove overgrown vegetation and replace with an
easily maintained grassed surface for better operation reasons. Figure 4 presents the proposed
maintenance plan for the proposed civil site construction activities.
3.1.2. Existing Bulkheads No. l and No. 2
Over 900 linear feet (LF) of existing coated sheet pile bulkheads are located on the north and east side of
the project site. Based on a previous investigation it was determined that the wall consist of a
combination of PZ -22 and PDA -27 hot rolled sheet piles. The bulkheads have reinforced concrete caps
and are anchored with tie rods approximately every 3 to 4 feet below the top of cap. The reinforced cap
is 1.5 ft wide by 2 ft deep, running the full length of the bulkhead. The steel wale for the anchorage is
located on the back side of the bulkhead, with the wale attachment visible on the front side of the sheet
pile. Figure 3 presents a cross section of the bulkhead and related details. Figures 5 and 6 provide
aerial photographs of existing Bulkheads No. 1 and No. 2, respectively. To best delineate the bulkheads,
the structures have been stationed from 0+00 to 4 +03.5 and 0 +00 to 5 +23 for Bulkheads No.1 and No.2
respectively.
A site investigation of the bulkheads occurred on May 31, 2012 by Moffat and Nichol Engineers; each
bulkhead was inspected above and below the water to identify areas of deterioration, damage, and
overall condition of the bulkheads. The results of the site investigation identified that currents and
wave action have significantly eroded the concrete bulkhead caps exposing the underlying sheet pile
resulting in corrosion and reduced structure longevity. According to the site investigation Bulkhead
No.1 is in Fair condition, as defined by ASCE's "Underwater Investigations Standard Practice Manual,"
31 Page

GP -56 Supporting Information
Construction and Repair to USARC
Morehead City, North Carolina
US Army Corps Engineers — Wilmington, NC
USARC Contract. No. W912HP -12 -C -0039
February 26, 2013
and requires repair of the existing concrete cap. An itemized list of defects is provided in the Tables
contained on Figure 5.
Bulkhead No.2 is in worse condition than Bulkhead No. 1. According to the site investigation Bulkhead
No.2 is in Poor condition, as defined by ASCE's "Underwater Investigations Standard Practice Manual,"
and requires repair of the existing concrete cap. An itemized list of defects is provided in the Tables
contained on Figure 6. The overall the proposed maintenance and repair schedule is presented in the
following table.
TABLE 2: Existing Bulkheads Maintenance and Repair and Schedule
ITEM
QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
Reinforced Concrete
REPAIR
Replace deteriorated concrete bulkhead
Bulkhead Cap (2' X T -3 ")
380 LF
cap with similar concrete cap.
The proposed bulkhead repair is a maintenance activity and shall return the bulkhead to its original
preexisting condition. Other work associated with the Bulkhead repair includes the filling of several
sinkholes that have developed behind the wall on the landward side, and the repair or replacement of
existing sheet piling. No new additions or modifications are proposed with this repair.
3.1.3. Existing LCU 1600 Pier
The Existing LCU 1600 Pier is a 9 -ft wide wood frame dock with an approximate deck area of 3,800
square feet (SF) located on the west side of the project site. The dock consists of timber decking,
bracing, and supports, and is supported by reinforced concrete bents with timber piling. Currents and
wave action have significantly deteriorated timber components of the dock, reducing the structure's
longevity. It is proposed to demolish and /or abandon timber components of the existing dock, and
replace them with new concrete components.
Items to be demolished and /or abandoned include timber decking, reinforced concrete bents, timber
piling and timber supports and bracing. Replacement concrete components include reinforced
platforms (decking) and bents, and pre- stressed concrete piling. Also, existing timber dolphins
surrounding the pier shall be removed and replaced with new 3 -pile timber dolphins to better protect
the repaired pier. Figure 7 presents the existing dock with an itemized demolition schedule. Figure 8
presents the upgraded concrete dock with an itemized repair schedule. The overall demolition and
repair schedule is presented below.
TABLE 3: Existing LCU Pier Maintenance and Repair Schedule
41 Page
UANTITIES
DEMO
REPAIR
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
Remove Decking, Beams, and Braces of
Wood Frame Dock
3,800 SF
3,800 SF
Existing Wood Framed Dock. Replace
With Concrete Platforms.
Remove existing conc. bents and replace
Reinforce Conc. Bents
39 EA
23 EA
with new reinforced conc. bents per new
design.
41 Page

GP -56 Supporting Information US Army Corps Engineers — Wilmington, NC
Construction and Repair to USARC USARC Contract. No. W912HP -12 -C -0039
Morehead City, North Carolina February 26, 2013
Not all existing components of the original dock shall be demolished; the existing reinforced concrete
mooring piers shall be reused in the upgraded concrete design, see Figures 6 and 7. The repaired
structure will have a final finished elevation of +5.50 FT NAVD88, which is higher than the current
finished elevation of +4.30 FT NAVD88. The proposed repair is a maintenance activity and shall return
the pier to its original condition and footprint. No new additions or modifications are proposed with this
repair.
The proposed repair is a maintenance activity and shall only affect previously disturbed upland areas to
return the yard area to original design conditions. No new additions or modifications are proposed with
this repair.
3.2. Proposed Additions
It is proposed to extend the existing East Dock, and to construct a new pier, the LCU 2000 Pier, to allow
additional berthing space for LCU vessels at the USARC.
3.2.1. East Dock Extension
The existing East Dock is a 6 -ft wide by 35 -ft long (210 SF) timber dock connected to a 13' -0" X 10' -9"
rectangular reinforced concrete mooring pier. The dock consists of timber decking, bracing, and
supports, and is supported by reinforced concrete bents with timber piling. The mooring pier is a
reinforced concrete structure supported by pre- stressed concrete piling. The proposed plan is to install
a second reinforced concrete mooring pier approximately 35 ft northeast of the existing mooring pier,
and connect the two mooring piers with a concrete platform. The proposed concrete platform will
provide an additional 210 SF of dock, and will be supported by the mooring piers. The finished elevation
will remain the same and is +4.30 FT NAVD88. The proposed mooring pier shall be 11' -3" square, contain
a sea bollard and be supported by pre- stressed piling. Figure 9 presents the proposed extension layout
and an itemized construction schedule. The overall repair schedule is presented below.
TABLE 4: Existing East Dock Extension Maintenance and Repair and Schedule
ITEM
78
46
Remove existing deteriorated timber
Piling
ti
(existing timer)
d
(proposed PSC)
piles and replace with 12" x 60' square
conc. mooring pier.
LCU 2000 Concrete Deck
pre- stressed concrete (PSC) piles.
Timber 3 -Pile Dolphins
18 EA
18 EA
Remove exiting deteriorating timber
Provide new reinforced concrete
(Pile Cap)
dolphins and replace with new.
Not all existing components of the original dock shall be demolished; the existing reinforced concrete
mooring piers shall be reused in the upgraded concrete design, see Figures 6 and 7. The repaired
structure will have a final finished elevation of +5.50 FT NAVD88, which is higher than the current
finished elevation of +4.30 FT NAVD88. The proposed repair is a maintenance activity and shall return
the pier to its original condition and footprint. No new additions or modifications are proposed with this
repair.
The proposed repair is a maintenance activity and shall only affect previously disturbed upland areas to
return the yard area to original design conditions. No new additions or modifications are proposed with
this repair.
3.2. Proposed Additions
It is proposed to extend the existing East Dock, and to construct a new pier, the LCU 2000 Pier, to allow
additional berthing space for LCU vessels at the USARC.
3.2.1. East Dock Extension
The existing East Dock is a 6 -ft wide by 35 -ft long (210 SF) timber dock connected to a 13' -0" X 10' -9"
rectangular reinforced concrete mooring pier. The dock consists of timber decking, bracing, and
supports, and is supported by reinforced concrete bents with timber piling. The mooring pier is a
reinforced concrete structure supported by pre- stressed concrete piling. The proposed plan is to install
a second reinforced concrete mooring pier approximately 35 ft northeast of the existing mooring pier,
and connect the two mooring piers with a concrete platform. The proposed concrete platform will
provide an additional 210 SF of dock, and will be supported by the mooring piers. The finished elevation
will remain the same and is +4.30 FT NAVD88. The proposed mooring pier shall be 11' -3" square, contain
a sea bollard and be supported by pre- stressed piling. Figure 9 presents the proposed extension layout
and an itemized construction schedule. The overall repair schedule is presented below.
TABLE 4: Existing East Dock Extension Maintenance and Repair and Schedule
ITEM
QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
20" X 80' -0" Square Pre-
Install new piles to support reinforced
stressed Conc. Piles
8 EA
conc. mooring pier.
LCU 2000 Concrete Deck
Provide new 6 -ft wide by 35 -ft long
Platform
210 SF
reinforced concrete platform.
11' -3" Square Mooring Pier
Provide new reinforced concrete
(Pile Cap)
1 EA
mooring pier
Sea Bollards
1 EA
Provide new sea bollard that match
existing Type II bollards.
51 Page

GP -56 Supporting Information US Army Corps Engineers — Wilmington, NC
Construction and Repair to USARC USARC Contract. No. W912HP -12 -C -0039
Morehead City, North Carolina February 26, 2013
3.2.2. New LCU 2000 Pier
The proposed LCU 2000 Pier is a 9 -ft wide concrete dock with a deck area of 2,100 SF. The deck area
consists of concrete platforms (decking) that is supported by reinforced concrete bents with pre-
stressed concrete piling. The deck area shall connect to six (6) reinforced concrete berthing piers and
pile cap structures. These structures are to be supported by pre- stressed concrete piling. The proposed
berthing piers shall be 11' -9" square, and each contains a single Type II sea bollard. The proposed pile
cap piers shall be 16' -0" X 10' -6" rectangular, with proposed concrete decking lying on the top of the pile
cap. The finished elevation shall be +6.50 FT NAVD88. Also, new 7 -pile timber dolphins shall be installed
in the locations indicated to better protect the new pier. Figure 10 presents the proposed LCU 2000 Pier
layout and an itemized construction schedule. The overall construction schedule is presented below.
TABLE 5: New LCU 2000 Pier Construction Schedule
ITEM
QUANTITY
DESCRIPTION
20" X 80' -0" Square Pre-
Install new piles to support reinforced
stressed Conc. Piles
44 EA
conc. berthing piers and pile caps.
14" X 50' -0" Square Pre-
Install new piles to support reinforced
stressed Conc. Piles
14 EA
conc. platforms
Install new bents to support reinforced
Reinforced Conc. Bents
7 EA
conc. platforms.
LCU 2000 Concrete Deck
Provide new 9 -ft reinforced concrete
Platform
2100 SF
platform.
11' -9" Square Berthing Pier
Provide new reinforced concrete
(Pile Cap)
4 EA
berthing piers.
16' -0" X 10" -6' Rectangular
Provide new reinforced concrete pile
Dock Pile Cap
2 EA
caps.
Sea Bollards
4 EA
Provide new sea bollard that match
existing Type II bollards.
Timber 7 -Pile Dolphins
2 EA
Provide new timber dolphins to protect
pier.
10' -0" X 12' -0" Reinforced
Provide a new 6" thick reinforced
Concrete Landing Pad
1 EA
concrete landing pad to connect pier
with shore.
4.0 GP -56 Conformance
The proposed project will be constructed in conformance with the standards authorized by GP -56, with
the exception of Special Conditions (d) and (e), which state maximum dock widths and areas. The
proposed project will not require any excavation or filling in any estuarine waters, tidelands,
marshlands, or State -owned lakes, nor will the project adversely affect any wetlands, submerged aquatic
vegetation, or navigable channels.
61 Page

GP -56 Supporting Information US Army Corps Engineers — Wilmington, NC
Construction and Repair to USARC USARC Contract. No. W912HP -12 -C -0039
Morehead City, North Carolina February 26, 2013
4.1. Exceptions to Special Conditions
The proposed piers will require widths greater than the maximum 6 -ft width requirement, and require
docking areas greater than the minimum 2,000 SF requirement to support the continued training and
mission of LCU vessels by the U.S. Army. The site already contains 6,600 SF of open water docking area,
and the proposed plan is to increase the open water docking area to 10,050 SF. LCUs are very large
vessels and require significantly larger docking facilities than typical marinas for safe and efficient
operation.
LCUs are used by amphibious forces to transport equipment and troops to shore. They are capable of
transporting tracked or wheeled vehicles, troops, or cargo from amphibious assault ships to beachheads
or piers. The specific types of LCUs to be used for this project are the LCU 1600, 2000 class and LCM -8
class "Mike Boats." These vessels range from 73 ft to 175 ft long and are designed to carry 400 combat
equipped troops or up to 350 tons of cargo. Therefore it is necessary to have significantly larger docking
areas than typical marinas located in this area.
The US Army requires the piers to be 9 -ft wide for safe operation and vehicle traffic, equipment loading,
and training operations. Additionally, the minimum deck area requirement needs to be exceeded to
properly moore and berth LCU vessels. Due to their large size, these vessels require much more
dockage front to ensure stable berthing for unloading, loading, and other typical tasks.
4.2. Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification
The project will require conformity with Section 401 under NCDENR's Water Quality Certification No.
3883. According to the conditions of Certification No. 3883, the proposed maintenance and
construction activities do not require written notification to NCDENR. However sediment and erosion
control practices must be in full compliance with all NCDENR specifications. According to local NCDENR,
the proposed project is a maintenance activity, and the proposed construction activities associated with
land disturbance are less than one -acre therefore not requiring ES &C plan or temporary construction
stormwater NPDES permit approval.
4.3. Stormwater Management Plan
The proposed project does not require a Stormwater Management Plan since stormwater discharges
during construction shall comply with NCDENR General Permit — NCG 010000. However, coverage under
this NPDES permit is not necessary since the proposed land disturbance activities are less than one -acre.
No stormwater permit modifications or other requirements are needed, since the proposed activity is a
maintenance activity and does not alter, modify, or change the existing site plan, other than the addition
of a dock. Therefore existing high density stormwater permit SW8931109 shall remain valid and no
further stormwater permitting is required.
5.0 Resource Agency Coordination
All work will be performed in previously disturbed areas on the property site and within 400 ft
waterward of the mean high water (MHWM) elevation in accordance with the recommendations and
requirements of local, state, and federal agencies including but not limited to Morehead City, Carteret
7 1 P a g e

GP -56 Supporting Information US Army Corps Engineers — Wilmington, NC
Construction and Repair to USARC USARC Contract. No. W912HP -12 -C -0039
Morehead City, North Carolina February 26, 2013
County, USACE - Wilmington Division, NCDENR, and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS). The following
section presents existing coordination with local, state, and federal agencies.
5.1. Local and County
Morehead City and Carteret County were contacted regarding the proposed project. Both agencies
indicated they do not oversee federal projects and assume the necessary state and federal regulations
and permits applicable to the proposed project are properly applied for and followed. Carteret County
indicated at the conclusion of the project, the County would require submission of the final approved
federal construction inspection report. It is USACE's intentions to keep the local authorities involved
and informed during the entire construction process.
5.2. NCDENR and NCDWQ
The NCDENR was contacted regarding the proposed project, most specifically regarding Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA) permitting and requirements. According to the NCDENR, CAMA permitting is
not required for federal projects, however the project must meet the requirements of North Carolina's
Department of Water Quality (NCDWQ), dredge and fill law, and Coastal Management Program.
Furthermore, the local NCDENR — Erosion and Sedimentation Program Office was contacted, and
according to this office, the proposed project is a maintenance activity with less than one -acre of land
disturbance activities.
5.3. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
The proposed project shall not affect Federal or State threatened or endangered species. A review of
Federal and State resources indicates that the following threatened and endangered species are present
in Morehead City, Carteret County, North Carolina. Currently, no threatened or endangered species are
present on the project site; however if encountered, the NCDENR and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(FWS) shall be contacted and appropriate actions taken. A reference report from the FWS, IPaC on -line
planning system for natural resources is attached to this report.
Based on preliminary conversations with FWS, the proposed project is unlikely to adversely affect any
threatened or endangered species or their habitat. However, FWS indicated that final project approval
will be granted after review of the NWP -03 and RP -56 permit applications. Additionally, FWS requested
that the proposed project and construction activities comply with all conditions of the FWS Guidelines
for Avoiding Impacts to the West Indian Manatee. These guidelines are attached to this report as a
reference. Any other significant concerns by FWS during the permitting process shall be addressed and
satisfactorily resolved prior to the start of construction.
5.4. Other
Additional resource coordination with other local, state, and federal agencies may occur during the
review of this consistency determination. All conditions arising from this review shall be incorporated
into the project requirements and satisfactorily resolved prior to the start of construction.
8 1 P a g e

GP -56 Supporting Information US Army Corps Engineers — Wilmington, NC
Construction and Repair to USARC USARC Contract. No. W912HP -12 -C -0039
Morehead City, North Carolina February 26, 2013
6.0 Mitigation
The proposed work involves maintenance and rehabilitation of existing federally maintained bulkheads,
piers and docks located at the USARMC. The proposed work also includes new construction to further
support the continued training and mission of LCU vessels by the U.S. Army. Environmental impacts of
the proposed repairs, upgrades and additions are occurring on previously disturbed areas and impacts
will be minimal and short- lived. The proposed project will not impact any wetlands, nor alter the
existing topography or vegetation of any shoreline, beach, or river corridors. Therefore, no mitigation is
required for the proposed project.
7.0 Areas of Environmental Concern
Project work shall occur in the Calico Creek / Newport River area corridor, and in the Morehead City
Harbor restricted area, which both are an Area of Environmental Concern (AEC) as defined by Section
113A -113 of the North Carolina CAMA. Specifically the proposed project will be occurring in estuarine
waters and within the shoreline of estuarine and public trust waters. The proposed work shall meet the
Management Objective and Use Standards of the Estuarine and Ocean System as outlined in 15A NCAC
07H.0200.
NCDWQ classifies the Calico Creek and Newport River as SC; HQW and SA; HQW, respectively, with
exception of the Morehead City Harbor restricted area, which is only listed as SC. NCDWQ classifies the
Atlantic Ocean as SB. The proposed activity will not degrade water quality or outstanding resource
values of the HQWs.
North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries does not clasiify the proposed project area as a Primary
Nursery Area (PNA). However, PNAs are located nearby in east portions of Calico Creek and to the
North in Crab Point Bay, but the project is not expected to cause any impacts due to the scope of the
project, which will remain directly within existing disturbed areas and 400 ft waterward of the MHW
elevation. A PNA map is attached in the reference section of this report.
Submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) species are not expected to be growing in the project area or
adjacent waters as a result of existing conditions and the natural turbidities generated by boat traffic,
tides, and currents that occur in that area. Conditions (water clarity, current, etc.) are not conducive for
SAV at the proposed project site.
There are no shellfish beds in the immediate project area; however it is possible that shellfish beds exist
in nearby waters. The proposed activity will not impact any shellfish beds at the project site or nearby
waters.
The project site is not designated as a "Natural and Cultural Resources Area ". Although the project is
not likely to impact cultural resources, proposed construction events shall be conditioned to ensure that
care is taken during all aspects of construction. Any cultural resources encountered will be protected,
and upon encountering, rapid coordination with USACE and North Carolina Department of Cultural
Resources, Underwater Archeological Unit shall occur.
91 Page

GP -56 Supporting Information
Construction and Repair to USARC
Morehead City, North Carolina
FIGURE 1:
FIGURE 2:
FIGURE 3:
FIGURE 4:
FIGURE 5:
FIGURE 6:
FIGURE 7:
FIGURE 8:
FIGURE 9:
FIGURE 10:
FIGURE 11:
US Army Corps Engineers — Wilmington, NC
USARC Contract. No. W912HP -12 -C -0039
February 26, 2013
FIGURES
USGS Topo Map
Aerial Site Map
Civil Site Plan
Structural Key Plan
Bulkhead No.1 Repair Plan
Bulkhead No. 2 Repair Plan
LCU 1600 Pier — Demolition Plan
LCU 1600 Pier — Maintenance and Repair Plan
East Dock — Proposed Extension Layout and Construction Plan
LCU 2000 Pier — Proposed Layout and Construction Plan
Miscellaneous Details
FIGURES

a
00
Willis
PROJECT SITE
SugarToaY V
II
i
%ague Sounrf
j.,
i �
Gnat %mb tone
ibint
omoney
fsfa "ri
w•
- Island � VCG
m �`�. MARINA 'Triple S. yrina Village ,
U McA tge
na
;o �-
�_ �yCl
ana �'� �SlBgdl�C8Cl1` �U
Prer r� �"'` •' :
Sponsmans
Pier _ - - • `T*+-r—
i,
' l CONSTRUCTION AND REPAIR TO
1 I USARC MOREHEAD CITY, NORTH CAROLINA
US Army Corps USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
of Engineers
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
CHARLESTONDISTRICT
CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA
DESIGNED BY
— ENGINEERING GROUP
DATE:
JAN -
DWN BY CKD BY
MDP
SOLICITATION NO.:
SUBMITTED BY
OTAK GROUP I-
CONTRACTOR NO.:
..—P- 13 -GOO]B
ENGINEERING GROUP
mmmExcwi wiv a
�s NI—Iaoi uory
uI
��lm�,,�
PLOTSCALE:PLOTDATe
AS SHOWN
FL NUMBER.
HK PROJ. NO 01000.003
SIZE: FILENAME'.
f
m
SHEET
IDENTIFICATION
FIG1
—ET 1 GF 11

t
IN 1�0
DOCK/PIER
•
r�
I
1
1-
I I
1
I
I
3 1
1
I
1
NR.
Two Story Masonry
I
I
� r
1' L
I _
- ig
1 I
1
11 II I IIIIINI
•
OHEAVY DUTY R.O.C. PAVEMENT SECTION
cm
0
One Story Masonry
O
KEYNOTES*
L INSTALL COMPACTED FILL AND HEAVY DUTY 12' THICK RUN OF CRUSHER (R .O C.)
GRAVEL PAVEMENT FOR, 20 FOOT WIDE, GRAVEL ROAD AS SHOWN GRAVEL ROAD
IS APPROXIMATELY 18,606 FTE
2. MATCH ELEVATION OF EXISTING PAVEMENT
• 3 CLEARING AND GRUBBING BOUNDARY. VEGETATION IS MOSTLY GRASS AND LIGHT
UNDERBRUSH GRADE FOR POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS RIVER.
4 INSTALL COMPACTED FILL AND 6' THICK IRO C GRAVEL PAVEMENT AS SHOWN
(91,218 FIE)
S CONSTRUCT CONCRETE LANDING PADS AS PER STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS
'�- !:[cam: ;'��q�� "�►+ _
,1� � A�.A� :r,r 1 • 1 • 1 1 y. A� A� • A��
• ti�i.�rriAirrr�` � ���
���— !�l:ii• ✓r e � i r � • r�rc; Y�� —�. -III
bo���Ata
.�.
�: = :1 %Illill
• • r • A _ ��
Wll
COMPACTEDSUBGRADE
nA L.O.C. •
I t' =30
PROPERTY LINE
ADJACENT — — DMCENT PROPERTY LINE
- - ROAD RIGNT-0f-WAY
- - - - - - - FASEMENTUNF
EDGE OF ASAHALTPAVEMENT
- - DITCH LURE ( :)
CLEARING AND GRUBBING BOUNDARY
— - x FENCE UNE
— - - - POWER UNE(OVERHEAD)
— - - - — POWER UNE(UNDERGROUND)
TELEPHONE LINE (UNDERGROUND)
- - TELEPHONE UNE(OVERHEAD)
— - SEWER LINE (UNDERGROUND)
— - SEWER FORLEMAIN(UNDERGROUND)
DRAINAGE LINE (UNDERGROUND)
- - - GASUNE(UNDERGROUNO
— - WATER LINE (UNDERGROUND)
0 - IRON PIPE FOUND w/ SIZE A TYPE DESG
Q IRON REBM FOUND r/ SITE A TYPE DESC.
E3 CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUND (OAF)
• MON %N SET (65 REBAR)
A CALCULATED POINT, NO MONUMENT SET
® FALRCADS%XEFOUND
UITUTT POLE
LIGHT POLE
® SMALL TRANSFORMER
® LARGE TRANSFORMER
} _ O POWER MANHOLE
O
SEWER MANHOLE
�D SANITARY SEWER CUFANOUT
TELEPHONE MANHOLE
D TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
CABLE BOX
O ® DRAINAGE MANHOLE
® DRAINAGEINLET(GRATE)
IJSW CONCRETE DRAINAGE IUNCIIOPI BOX
(o A WATER VALVE
® WATER METER
' FIRE HYDRANT
. GAS VALVE
UQIill E %iiii
n n
I 1
US gd EAD�
CHARLESTON DISTRICT
all GAS METER
SF SQUARE FEET
AG ACLE(4XSE0 SF /ACRE) H
EX EXISTING
DIP DUCMI IRON PIPE
HS HIGH SIDE
LS LOW SIDE
F F E HNlO1ED FLOOR ELEVATION
N INVERTELEVATKIN
GPR GROUND PENTRETOG RADAR
QTEMPORARY BENCHMARK ITS M I
PERMIT DRAWINGS
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR SHEET
CONSTRUCTION IDENTIFICATION
DATE 01/14/13 FIG 3
mffT P a ,
<7Ut.FFUI L VCR UW IL V ill
GENERAL NOTES
L CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL WORK SHOWN, UNLESS SPECIFICALLY
INDICATED OTHERWISE
2. CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE SITE PRIOR TO BIDDING TO DETERMINE THE
• E
EXTENT OF THE PROJECT
® 3
3 CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FIELD LOCATING AND PROTECTING ALL
UTILITIES CONTACT THE CONTRACTING OFFICER IN THE EVENT THAT UTRTIES
CONFLICT WITH NEW FACILITIES
EAST LCU 3000
DOCKfi BID OPTION 41 4
4. ALL PROJECT STAKEOUT SHALL BE PERFORMED BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR
REFER TOSHEET 1101 FOR T
TO BE PAID FOR BY THE CONTRACTOR. FOR STAKEOUT, DO NOT RELY SOLELY ON
® B
THE PHYSICAL SCALE AS SHOWN IN DRAWINGS REFER TO THE GIVEN
DIMENSIONS, SYMBOL LEGEND, KEYNOTES, AND REFERENCED DETAILS FOR
CORRECTSTAKEOUT
KEYNOTES*
L INSTALL COMPACTED FILL AND HEAVY DUTY 12' THICK RUN OF CRUSHER (R .O C.)
GRAVEL PAVEMENT FOR, 20 FOOT WIDE, GRAVEL ROAD AS SHOWN GRAVEL ROAD
IS APPROXIMATELY 18,606 FTE
2. MATCH ELEVATION OF EXISTING PAVEMENT
• 3 CLEARING AND GRUBBING BOUNDARY. VEGETATION IS MOSTLY GRASS AND LIGHT
UNDERBRUSH GRADE FOR POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOWARDS RIVER.
4 INSTALL COMPACTED FILL AND 6' THICK IRO C GRAVEL PAVEMENT AS SHOWN
(91,218 FIE)
S CONSTRUCT CONCRETE LANDING PADS AS PER STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS
'�- !:[cam: ;'��q�� "�►+ _
,1� � A�.A� :r,r 1 • 1 • 1 1 y. A� A� • A��
• ti�i.�rriAirrr�` � ���
���— !�l:ii• ✓r e � i r � • r�rc; Y�� —�. -III
bo���Ata
.�.
�: = :1 %Illill
• • r • A _ ��
Wll
COMPACTEDSUBGRADE
nA L.O.C. •
I t' =30
PROPERTY LINE
ADJACENT — — DMCENT PROPERTY LINE
- - ROAD RIGNT-0f-WAY
- - - - - - - FASEMENTUNF
EDGE OF ASAHALTPAVEMENT
- - DITCH LURE ( :)
CLEARING AND GRUBBING BOUNDARY
— - x FENCE UNE
— - - - POWER UNE(OVERHEAD)
— - - - — POWER UNE(UNDERGROUND)
TELEPHONE LINE (UNDERGROUND)
- - TELEPHONE UNE(OVERHEAD)
— - SEWER LINE (UNDERGROUND)
— - SEWER FORLEMAIN(UNDERGROUND)
DRAINAGE LINE (UNDERGROUND)
- - - GASUNE(UNDERGROUNO
— - WATER LINE (UNDERGROUND)
0 - IRON PIPE FOUND w/ SIZE A TYPE DESG
Q IRON REBM FOUND r/ SITE A TYPE DESC.
E3 CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUND (OAF)
• MON %N SET (65 REBAR)
A CALCULATED POINT, NO MONUMENT SET
® FALRCADS%XEFOUND
UITUTT POLE
LIGHT POLE
® SMALL TRANSFORMER
® LARGE TRANSFORMER
} _ O POWER MANHOLE
O
SEWER MANHOLE
�D SANITARY SEWER CUFANOUT
TELEPHONE MANHOLE
D TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
CABLE BOX
O ® DRAINAGE MANHOLE
® DRAINAGEINLET(GRATE)
IJSW CONCRETE DRAINAGE IUNCIIOPI BOX
(o A WATER VALVE
® WATER METER
' FIRE HYDRANT
. GAS VALVE
UQIill E %iiii
n n
I 1
US gd EAD�
CHARLESTON DISTRICT
all GAS METER
SF SQUARE FEET
AG ACLE(4XSE0 SF /ACRE) H
EX EXISTING
DIP DUCMI IRON PIPE
HS HIGH SIDE
LS LOW SIDE
F F E HNlO1ED FLOOR ELEVATION
N INVERTELEVATKIN
GPR GROUND PENTRETOG RADAR
QTEMPORARY BENCHMARK ITS M I
PERMIT DRAWINGS
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR SHEET
CONSTRUCTION IDENTIFICATION
DATE 01/14/13 FIG 3
mffT P a ,
<7Ut.FFUI L VCR UW IL V ill
'�- !:[cam: ;'��q�� "�►+ _
,1� � A�.A� :r,r 1 • 1 • 1 1 y. A� A� • A��
• ti�i.�rriAirrr�` � ���
���— !�l:ii• ✓r e � i r � • r�rc; Y�� —�. -III
bo���Ata
.�.
�: = :1 %Illill
• • r • A _ ��
Wll
COMPACTEDSUBGRADE
nA L.O.C. •
I t' =30
PROPERTY LINE
ADJACENT — — DMCENT PROPERTY LINE
- - ROAD RIGNT-0f-WAY
- - - - - - - FASEMENTUNF
EDGE OF ASAHALTPAVEMENT
- - DITCH LURE ( :)
CLEARING AND GRUBBING BOUNDARY
— - x FENCE UNE
— - - - POWER UNE(OVERHEAD)
— - - - — POWER UNE(UNDERGROUND)
TELEPHONE LINE (UNDERGROUND)
- - TELEPHONE UNE(OVERHEAD)
— - SEWER LINE (UNDERGROUND)
— - SEWER FORLEMAIN(UNDERGROUND)
DRAINAGE LINE (UNDERGROUND)
- - - GASUNE(UNDERGROUNO
— - WATER LINE (UNDERGROUND)
0 - IRON PIPE FOUND w/ SIZE A TYPE DESG
Q IRON REBM FOUND r/ SITE A TYPE DESC.
E3 CONCRETE MONUMENT FOUND (OAF)
• MON %N SET (65 REBAR)
A CALCULATED POINT, NO MONUMENT SET
® FALRCADS%XEFOUND
UITUTT POLE
LIGHT POLE
® SMALL TRANSFORMER
® LARGE TRANSFORMER
} _ O POWER MANHOLE
O
SEWER MANHOLE
�D SANITARY SEWER CUFANOUT
TELEPHONE MANHOLE
D TELEPHONE PEDESTAL
CABLE BOX
O ® DRAINAGE MANHOLE
® DRAINAGEINLET(GRATE)
IJSW CONCRETE DRAINAGE IUNCIIOPI BOX
(o A WATER VALVE
® WATER METER
' FIRE HYDRANT
. GAS VALVE
UQIill E %iiii
n n
I 1
US gd EAD�
CHARLESTON DISTRICT
all GAS METER
SF SQUARE FEET
AG ACLE(4XSE0 SF /ACRE) H
EX EXISTING
DIP DUCMI IRON PIPE
HS HIGH SIDE
LS LOW SIDE
F F E HNlO1ED FLOOR ELEVATION
N INVERTELEVATKIN
GPR GROUND PENTRETOG RADAR
QTEMPORARY BENCHMARK ITS M I
PERMIT DRAWINGS
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR SHEET
CONSTRUCTION IDENTIFICATION
DATE 01/14/13 FIG 3
mffT P a ,
<7Ut.FFUI L VCR UW IL V ill
UQIill E %iiii
n n
I 1
US gd EAD�
CHARLESTON DISTRICT
all GAS METER
SF SQUARE FEET
AG ACLE(4XSE0 SF /ACRE) H
EX EXISTING
DIP DUCMI IRON PIPE
HS HIGH SIDE
LS LOW SIDE
F F E HNlO1ED FLOOR ELEVATION
N INVERTELEVATKIN
GPR GROUND PENTRETOG RADAR
QTEMPORARY BENCHMARK ITS M I
PERMIT DRAWINGS
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR SHEET
CONSTRUCTION IDENTIFICATION
DATE 01/14/13 FIG 3
mffT P a ,
<7Ut.FFUI L VCR UW IL V ill
PERMIT DRAWINGS
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR SHEET
CONSTRUCTION IDENTIFICATION
DATE 01/14/13 FIG 3
mffT P a ,
<7Ut.FFUI L VCR UW IL V ill

mil
REPAIR -& REPLACE EXISTING DOCK.
REQUIRES USE OF EXISTING PIERS,
NEW PILING, AND DECKING
LCU 1600
DOCK & PIERS
I
PROPOSED DOCK.
PROVIDE NEW PILING
AND DECKING
LCU 2000 SERIES
EXISTING I - EAST DOCK &PIER
BULKHEAD
NO. 2
I 0 JD I
I
I
M Lqj
SHORELINE ••
00
El
TRAINING BLDG X C
00
EXISTING EE
\ SHEET PILE WALL
REPAIR CONCRETE
BULKHEAD CAP
AS NEEDED
SHOP BLDG
r
� O
STRUCTURAL KEY PLAN
SCALE: 1/16" = V -0"
I
— REPLACING
* ** C .Mfef.l Drava * **
CONCRETE CAP
REPAIR CONCRETE BULKHEAD
CAP AS NEEDED
EXTEND EXISTING DOCK.
REQUIRES NEW PILING
AND DECKING
EXISTING BULKHEAD
NO. 2 f�
EAST DOCK
I EXTENSION '
EXISTING LCU •
1 2000 SERIES '
LOADING RAMP
' EXISTING EAST'
DOCK
EXISTING
BULKHEAD
NO. 1
REPAIR CONCRETE
BULKHEAD CAP
AS NEEDED
PERMIT DRAWINGS
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
DATE: 01/14/13
tit f\_____1 \ /_.__- r__•___
t
d��
ONNILESTON DISTRICT
o
F SHEET
MNFICATION
FIG 4
IL m_.._ * *,
vuNNvi L V C1 UW L-I Iyn IWVI 11 IV - n IF or0

fj�75 2 +TA. 2 +71
STA. 2 +53
STA. 2 +33.5
STA.
3 1 =
3 4
5
of US ngi Corps
CHARLESTON DISTRICT
BULKHEAD 1 DEFECTS
STATION
DEFECT DESCRIPTION
0 +56
Sinkhole behind bulkhead — 5' long x1' wide x 1' -4" deep
0 +96
Sinkhole behind bulkhead — 1' -4"' long xl' wide x 8" deep
1 +05
Sinkhole behind bulkhead — 2' -0 "' long xl' wide x 9" deep
1 +20
Sinkhole behind bulkhead — 1' long x1' wide x 9" deep
1 +36
Corner of bulkhead cap — mechanical spall 2'x1.5'x4" deep with longitudinal bars
and stirrup exposed
1 +49
Concrete cap - 1/8" wide diagonal crack from impact damage
1 +55
Missing bolt for wale anchorage
1 +56
Concrete Cap — Mechanical spall 1'xl.5'x1" deep
1 +66
Concrete Cap — Mechanical spall 7'xl.5'xl' deep
1 +75
Concrete Cap — Mechanical spall 10'x6 "x6" outboard corner
1 +82
Concrete Cap — Mechanical spall 1'x9 "x3" deep
1 +85
Concrete Cap — Open corrosion spall 4'x6 "x6" bottom outboard corner
2 +14
Concrete Cap — Moderate to severe damage, exposed reinforcing (Photograph 10)
2 +34
Concrete Cap — %_" wide transverse crack
2 +76
Concrete Cap — 4' long section of severely damaged cap
2 +76
Hole 13' behind bulkhead from bollard foundation pulled out of ground from
mooring line.
2 +84
Concrete Cap — Mechanical spall 3'xl.5'xl' deep
3 +01
Concrete Cap — Mechanical spall 3'xl.'x3" deep
BULKHEAD 1 & 2 - MAINTENANCE & REPAIRS SCHEDULE
ITEM
QUANTITY
REMARK
T -0" x 3' -3" REINF CONIC
ESTIMATED QTY BASED ON BULKHEAD INVESTIGATION
380 FT
REPORT BY MOFFATT & NICHOL (PROJECT NO. 7787) DATED
BULKHEAD WALL CAP
06/18/12 LOCATED IN THE RFP PROJECT APPENDICES.
PERMIT DRAWINGS
z
0
o
a � �
w Q
V p
Z
J
PERMIT DRAWINGS
�
z
0
o
a � �
w Q
uNNUIL vd1UC 1Z-IIyII1CCInIy. - it rd
V p
Z
J
Q
V
�
m
fn
SHEET
IDENTIFICATION
FIG
5
uNNUIL vd1UC 1Z-IIyII1CCInIy. - it rd

M■
IST
"_
G I 3
11%01 1-.%# nr%1YIr
MLM
BULKHEAD 2 DEFECTS
STATION
DEFECT DESCRIPTION
0 +62
Concrete Cap — Heavy damage and cracking 4' long section at the corner of
bulkhead
0+62
Sinkhole behind bulkhead —43' long x. 5'wide x 3' deep
0 +75
Concrete Cap — Severe damage with exposed reinforcing
0 +87
Concrete Cap — Severe damage with exposed rebar and sheet piles heavily
corroded. Wall bowing outward around this location.
1 +30
Sinkhole behind bulkhead — 7' long x 3' wide x 3' deep
1 +40
20' long section of mechanically spalled corner with 9 exposed stirrups
1 +67
Concrete Cap — Mechanical Spal( Tx 1' x 2' deep
1 +67
Sinkhole behind bulkhead — 2' diameter x 2' deep
2 +15
Concrete Cap — Completely damaged and missing with sheet piles heavilycorroded.
Wall bowing outward around this location.
3 +73
Concrete Cap — Severe cracking with exposed rebar.
3 +78
Sinkhole behind bulkhead — 15' long x 4' wide x 6' deep
4 +85
Concrete Cap — Mechanical Spall 3' x 1' x 3" deep
5 +00
Concrete Cap — Y" wide crack at corner
BULKHEAD 1 & 2 - MAINTENANCE & REPAIRS SCHEDULE
ITEM
QUANTITY
REMARK
2' -0" x 3' -3" REINF CONIC
QTY BASED ON BULKHEAD INVESTIGATION
380 FT
380
REPORT BY MOFFATT & NICHOL (PROJECT No. 7787) DATED
BULKHEAD WALL CAP
06/18/12 LOCATED IN THE RFP PROJECT APPENDICES
PERMIT DRAWINGS
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
DATE: 01/14/13
+** fl... _ — i i-1--- �---
VGIGIY 1 GrJ
FE-0-1
US Army Corps
of Engineers'
CHARLESTON DISTRICT
O
0` g� U
a X a
Z � Y
U
1_
o2 J)
U �
SHEET
IDENTIFICATION
FIG 6
IL r% —..— tai
%JUI.l LIVI L V QIUG L_I lyll IGGI11ly - IL I CAYO

o
DEMOLISH 3 -PILE TIMBER DOLPHINS
C8 C8 WATERS OF THE (14 "x60' -0" EA.) - SEE SCHEDULE FOR QTY.
CRAB POINT BAY & C8
NEW PORT RIVER
_ 9' -0" c"I 9' -0"
REINF. CONC. PIER SUPPORTED
N N ON PSC PILES (TYP)
REINF. CONC.
PIER SUPPORTED
ON PSC PILES (TYP) i—DEMOLISH ALL WOOD FRAMED
DOCKS
C8 DEMOLISH ALL TIMBER PILE
zh C8 C8 C8
SUPPORTED CONC. BENTS. ABANDON
REMAINING TIMBER PILES
9' -0" - j::791_0H
C8 '8 T /DECK ELEV. _ +5.50' ( + / -)
c) m o� m (TYPICAL)
AA
4 .
.�. F-7-1 o -
48' -7y2' 109' -0" 49' -4"
3
CONC. LANDING
PAD TO REMAIN ,— SHORELINE
,_
DEMOLITION PLAN - LCU - 1600 DOCK
SCALE: 1/16" =1' -0"
LCU 1600 DOCK MAINTENANCE & REPAIRS - DEMOLITION SCHEDULE
ITEM
QUANTITY
REMARK
LCU 1600 WOOD FRAMED
INCLUDES DECKING Si BEAMS, REFER TO EXISTING DWG
DOCK
38 SF
00
DETAIL B/P FOR DETAILS OF WOOD FRAMED DOCK
REFER TO EXISTING DWG SECTIONS AND DETAILS 1, 3, & D
REINF CONC BENTS
39 EA
ON PS-8 FOR BENT DETAILS
THIS IS ESTIMATED QTY OF DOLPHINS TO BE DEMOLISHED
TIMBER 3 -PILE DOLPHINS
19
FINALAMOUNT SHALL BE VERIFIED DURING FINAL DESIGN
PHASE
PLAN NOTES:
1. ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD88 DATUM.
2. MEAN LOWER LOW WATER (MLLW) ELEV = -2.09'
MEAN HIGHER HIGH WATER (MHHW) ELEV = +1.40'
FEMA BASE FLOOD ELEV = +6.00', ZONE AE
3. HARDWARE EMBEDDED IN CONCRETE SHALL BE STAINLESS STEEL ALL OTHER STEEL HARDWARE
SHALL BE HOT DIP GALVANIZED.
LEGEND
® AREA OF DEMOLITION
c8 3 -PILE TIMBER DOLPHIN
CONC PILE CAP STRUCTURE TO REMAIN
STEEL SHEET
PILING
CONC. LANDING
PAD TO REMAIN
* ** C .Mfch/ Dnv0 * **
PERMIT DRAWINGS
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
DATE: 01/14/13
US Army Carps
dftke -
CWLEST CMTRET
SHEET
IDENTIFICATION
FIG 7
.� 1 . ,
iii P\_..- _- 1 \ /.1__. f- '_- 1-- __.. -� IL fl�..� •!"A'i
vuNNvlt va1uv GIIy111iuvi111y — It I cayo

I-m■
m.
9' -0" =
_ rl 00
' O '
_O
Zn M m M
ZIN m
C C8
36' -6" 35' -10" 36' -6"
48' -7" V2 109' -01, J11
LEXISTING CONC.
LANDING PAD i— SHORELINE
LCU - 1600 PIER
SCALE: 1/16" =1' -0"
w
0
ANEW 3 -PILE TIMBER DOLPHINS
(14"x60' -0" EA.)
9' -0"
EXISTING REINF. CONC.
PIER SUPPORTED
ON 12" PSC PILES (TYP)
NEW REINFORCED CONCRETE DECK
NEW REINFORCED CONC. BENTS
SUPPORT NEW CONC. BENTS ON
14 "x60' -0" PSC SQUARE PILES,
2 PILES PER BENT
""—CONC. /DECK ELEV. = +5.50' ( + / -)
(TYPICAL)
9' -0"
C8 ce
49' -4"
Y 1 O
LCU 1600 DOCK MAINTENANCE & REPAIRS - REPAIR WORK SCHEDULE
ITEM
QUANTITY
REMARK
14" X 60' -0" SQUARE PSC PILES
WATERS OF THE
(8 )-1/2° DIA 270 KSI LO-LAX STRAND
REINF CONC BENTS
17 EA
CRAB POINT BAY &�
LCU 1600 REINF CONC DECK
38W SF
co
ce NEW PORT RIVER
18 EA
.•
BERTHING FENDERS
5 EA
Tx 5' FOAM FILLED FENDER (WHERE ORIGINAL FOAM
FILLED FENDERS ARE MISSING, PROVIDE MATCHING
REPLACEMENT FOAM FILLED FENDERS)
9' -0"
N
F
-
i
-
F
^
00
N
N
m
N
m
m
EXISTING REINF.
-
CONC. PIER SUPPORTED
ON 12" PSC PILES (TYP)
00
e-i
in
Ol
N
N
N
-
I
1
LA
ei
N -
N
I-m■
m.
9' -0" =
_ rl 00
' O '
_O
Zn M m M
ZIN m
C C8
36' -6" 35' -10" 36' -6"
48' -7" V2 109' -01, J11
LEXISTING CONC.
LANDING PAD i— SHORELINE
LCU - 1600 PIER
SCALE: 1/16" =1' -0"
w
0
ANEW 3 -PILE TIMBER DOLPHINS
(14"x60' -0" EA.)
9' -0"
EXISTING REINF. CONC.
PIER SUPPORTED
ON 12" PSC PILES (TYP)
NEW REINFORCED CONCRETE DECK
NEW REINFORCED CONC. BENTS
SUPPORT NEW CONC. BENTS ON
14 "x60' -0" PSC SQUARE PILES,
2 PILES PER BENT
""—CONC. /DECK ELEV. = +5.50' ( + / -)
(TYPICAL)
9' -0"
C8 ce
49' -4"
Y 1 O
LCU 1600 DOCK MAINTENANCE & REPAIRS - REPAIR WORK SCHEDULE
ITEM
QUANTITY
REMARK
14" X 60' -0" SQUARE PSC PILES
34 EA
(8 )-1/2° DIA 270 KSI LO-LAX STRAND
REINF CONC BENTS
17 EA
REFER TO DETAILS ON FIG. 11
LCU 1600 REINF CONC DECK
38W SF
INCLUDES DECKING & BEAMS, REFER DETAILS ON FIG. 11
TIMBER 3 -PILE DOLPHINS
18 EA
THIS IS ESTIMATED QTY OF DOLPHINS TO BE REPLACED.
FINAL AMOUNT WILL BE VERIFIED DURING FINAL DESIGN
PHASE
BERTHING FENDERS
5 EA
Tx 5' FOAM FILLED FENDER (WHERE ORIGINAL FOAM
FILLED FENDERS ARE MISSING, PROVIDE MATCHING
REPLACEMENT FOAM FILLED FENDERS)
CR
tp
I
9' -0"
m
N
n
in
m
EXISTING CONC.
LANDING PAD
DESIGN CRITERIA:
DOCK/PIER, MOORING & BERTHING DESIGNS SHALL MEET ALL APPLICABLE DESIGN CRITERIA AND
CODES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
• UFC 4- 151 -10 GENERAL CRITERIA FOR WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION
• UFC 4 -152 -01 DESIGN: PIERS & WHARVES
• UFC 4 -152 -07 DESIGN: SMALL CRAFT BERTHING FACILITIES
• UFC 4- 159-02 ENGINEERING & DESIGN OF MILITARY PORTS
• UFC 4 -159-03 DESIGN: MOORINGS
DESIGN LOADS:
• LIVE LOAD: 100 PSF (MATCHES EXISTING)
• HEAVY WEATHER MOORING WIND DESIGN SPEED: 115 MPH (100 KNOTS)
• MOORING CONDITION. TYPE III
PLAN NOTES:
1. ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD88 DATUM.
2. MEAN LOWER LOW WATER (MLLW) ELEV = -2 09'
MEAN HIGHER HIGH WATER (MHHW) ELEV = +1.40'
FEMA 100 YR BASE FLOOD ELEV = +6 00', ZONE AE
3. TOP OF REPAIRED DOCK DECKING ELEVATION SHALL MATCij EXISTING ELEVATION = 4.30't.
4. HARDWARE CAST INTO OR EMBEDDED IN CONCRETE SHALL BE STAINLESS STEEL ALL OTHER
STEEL HARDWARE SHALL BE HOT DIP GALVANIZED.
5. DO NOT RE -USE EXISTING TIMBER FRAMING FOR CONSTRUCTION OF DOCK REPAIRS
INDICATED ON THIS DRAWING.
6 LOCATIONS OF REPLACEMENT BENTS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE FOR GENERAL REFERENCE
ONLY. REPLACEMENT BENTS SHALL BE LOCATED SUCH THAT REMOVAL OF EXISTING TIMBER
PILES IS MINIMIZED & AVOIDED WHERE POSSIBLE.
LEGEND
CIS REPLACED 3 -PILE TIMBER DOLPHIN
DEXISTING CONC. PILE CAP STRUCTURE
® NEW PILES & BENTS
* ** 0-9-4- 0_, * **
VMIV \' 1 M'v
.t
1
1. 1
ofF.�R.�°'
CHMLESTON DISTRICT
s
PERMIT DRAWINGS g
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
SHEET
DATE: 01/14/13 IDENTIFICATION
FIG 8
vYF/F/vl L v alums L.1 lyn Iccl a ly - IL 1 QyO

I
all
0
a
BULKHEAD & EAST DOCK EXTENSION MAINTENANCE & REPAIRS SCHEDULE
ITEM
QUANTITY
REMARK
20" x 80' -0" SQUARE PSC PILES
8 EA
(16 )-1/2" DIA 270 KSI LO-LAX STRAND
LCU 2000 REINF CONC. DOCK
210 SF
INCLUDES DECKING & BEAMS, REFER DETAILS ON FIG 11
11' -3" SQUARE x4' -0" DEEP
1 EA
5000 PSI MARINE CONCRETE W/ EPDXY REBAR
MOORING PILE CAP
6 SALVAGEABLE SEA BOLLARDS TO BE RE -USED PROVIDE 3
SEA BOLLARDS
1
NEW SEA BOLLARDS THAT MATCH TYPE II SEA BOLLARDS AS
INDICATED ON EXISTING DWG PS-5
EAST DOCK & PIER EXTENSION 11�
DESIGN CRITERIA:
+ 7 DOCK/PIER, MOORING &BERTHING DESIGNS SHALL MEETALL APPLICABLE DESIGN CRITERIA AND
EL. +4.30 �a CODES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
EXISTING EAST DOCK & PIERS —, A,
EXISTING
BULKHEAD
NO. 1
0
NEW SEA BOLLARD
MOORING PILE
CAP STRUCTURE
CONC. /DECK
G BULKHEAD NO. 1
LEGEND
- °- "REV"ILES
® EXISTING SEA BOLLARD
® NEW SEA BOLLARD
EAST DOCK EXTENSION CONSTRUCTION
PLAN
SCALE: 1/16" =1' -0"
• UFC 4- 151 -10 GENERAL CRITERIA FOR WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION
• UFC4 -152 -01 DESIGN: PIERS & WHARVES
• UFC 4 -152 -07 DESIGN: SMALL CRAFT BERTHING FACILITIES
• UFC 4 -159 -02 ENGINEERING & DESIGN OF MILITARY PORTS
• UFC4 -159 -03 DESIGN: MOORINGS
DESIGN LOADS,
• LIVE LOAD: 100 PSF
• HEAVY WEATHER MOORING WIND DESIGN SPEED: 115 MPH (100 KNOTS)
• MOORING CONDITION: TYPE III
PLAN NOTES:
1. ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD88 DATUM.
2. MEAN LOWER LOW WATER (MLLW) ELEV = -2.09'
MEAN HIGHER HIGH WATER (MHHW) ELEV = +1.40'
FEMA 100 YR BASE FLOOD ELEV = +6.00', ZONE AE
3. HARDWARE CAST INTO AND EMBEDDED IN CONCRETE SHALL BE STAINLESS STEEL ALL OTHER
STEEL HARDWARE SHALL BE HOT DIP GALVANIZED
* ** 0^f^e .• D -mvR+ * **
t
W AMY Corps
a Englmm••
CHARLESTON DISTRICT
PERMIT DRAWINGS g
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
SHEET
DATE: 01/14/13 IDENTIFICATION
FIG 9
* ** e+..____L11 a n_.._ * *I
vurrvIL vIIA UW IL 1 ayv

N
Z
J
60' -0" 70' -0" 60'-0" 4' -0" x 8' -0" FOAM FILLED
�/ ]� BERTHING FENDER BY
24' -11" 1'211 24' -11" 29' -11" 1[11 29' 11" 24' -il" 1 "11 24' -11" FSEAGUARD
C7-PILITIMBER
DOLPHIN (TYP x2)
m— irt, m
I ro h7: ---w
IER ELEV. = 8.00'
CONC./DECK ELEV. = 8.00' o • CONC. /PIER ELEV. = 8.00'
® ®® ® ® -' ° 9 0 I. NEW SEA BOLLARD (TYP. x 4)
• 0 ® ®M • • 1 BERTHING PILE CAP
STRUCTURE (TYP x4) REINFORCED CONCRETE
CONC./DECK ELEV. = 6.50'
°T ° 2 4 PLATFORM (DECKING)
• ® 0 • ®® ° ° ^ EXISTING
° ® ® 0 e ® ®- ° FBULKHEAD NO. 2
CONC. /LANDING PAD ELEV. = 4.50' --T 12_p" �o
\-6" THICK CONC. LANDING PAD W/ 12 "x12"
TURNDOWN EDGES & #4 @12" O.C.
EXISTING STEEL
SHEET PILE WALL
LEGEND
e EXISTING PSC PILES
o NEW PILES
LCU 2000 SERIES EAST DOCK & PIER
SCALE: 1/16" =1' -0"
a
LCU 2000 EAST DOCK & PIER - NEW WORK SCHEDULE
ITEM
QUANTITY
REMARK
20" x 80' -W SQUARE PSC PILES
44 EA
(16 }1/2" DIA 270 KSI LO -LAX STRAND
14" X SO' O" SQUARE PSC PILES
6 EA
(8) -1/2" DIA 270 KSI L04 AX STRAND
REINF CONC BENTS
3 EA
REFER TO DETAILS ON FIG. 11.
LCU 2000 REINF. CONC. DECK
2100 SF
INCLUDES DECKING & BEAMS, REFER TO DETAILS ON FIG. 11.
11' -9" SQUARE x 4' -0" DEEP
4 EA
5000 PSI MARINE CONCRETE W/ EPDXY REBAR
BERTHING /FENDER PILE CAPS
16' -0" x 10"-6" x 4' -0" DOCK
2 EA
5000 PSI MARINE CONCRETE W/ EPDXY REBAR
PILE CAPS
BERTHING FENDERS
4 EA
4'x8' FOAM FILLED FENDER BY SEAGUARD(TM)
6 SALVAGEABLE SEA BOLLARDS TO BE RE -USED PROVIDE 3
SEA BOLLARDS
4 EA
NEW SEA BOLLARDS THAT MATCH TYPE II SEA BOLLARDS
TIMBER 7 -PILE DOLPHINS
2 EA
REFER TO DETAILS ON FIG. 11.
6" THICK SLAB W/ 12 "X12"
TURNDOWN EDGES & #4 @12"
1 EA
REINFORCED CONCRETE
71
OC
1
DESIGN CRITERIA
DOCKIPIER, MOORING & BERTHING DESIGNS SHALL MEET ALL APPLICABLE DESIGN CRITERIA AND
CODES INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:
• UFC4- 151 -10 GENERAL CRITERIA FOR WATERFRONT CONSTRUCTION
• UFC 4 -152 -01 DESIGN: PIERS & WHARVES
• UFC 4 -152 -07 DESIGN: SMALL CRAFT BERTHING FACILITIES
• UFC 4- 159-02 ENGINEERING & DESIGN OF MILITARY PORTS
• UFC 4 -159-03 DESIGN: MOORINGS
DESIGN LOADS:
• WE LOAD: 100 PSF
• HEAVY WEATHER MOORING WIND DESIGN SPEED: 11S MPH (100 KNOTS)
• MOORING CONDITION: TYPE III
PLAN NOTES:
1. ELEVATIONS REFERENCE NAVD88 DATUM.
2 MEAN LOWER LOW WATER (MLLW) ELEV = -2 09'
MEAN HIGHER HIGH WATER (MHHW) ELEV = +140'
FEMA 100 YR BASE FLOOD ELEV = +6 00', ZONE AE
3. HARDWARE CAST INTO AND EMBEDDED IN CONCRETE SHALL BE STAINLESS STEEL ALL OTHER STEEL
HARDWARE SHALL BE HOT DIP GALVANIZED.
4. PROVIDE UHMWPE WEAR STRIPS BETWEEN FENDER PILES AND FOAM FILLED FENDERS
* ** C.tinhi D.m.ie+ * **
US Mmy Corps
of E°°b'.
CMMLUTM DMTRCT
O
PERMIT DRAWINGS g
PRELIMINARY
NOT FOR
CONSTRUCTION
SHEET
DATE: 01/14/13 IDENTIFICATION
FIG 10
ewffr ,o a ,
v..rrv.. - I.W. ......".. .y ... ...j..

) I
II
NEW 14' (DUAL) —1k
PRESSURE TREATED
TIMBER PILE 60'-0-
LONG (TYP)
PLAN
ELEV 1000'
ELEV ILW
WRAP W/ 7 TURNS OF
I• DIA GALV WIRE ROPE
EA TURN STAPLED TO EA
PILE W/ 3/8•x41/2' GALV
STAPLES (TYP)
ELEV 4 00'
H
TYPICAL BULKHEAD DETAIL
SCALE 3/4"- V-0*
ELEVATION
3 - PILE DOLPHIN
SCALE 31W • 1-0
` I
NEW 14• (DUAL) PRESSURE
TREATED TIMBER PILE 60' -0'
LONG (TYP)
20• PSC FENDER PILE
W/ 4' -0• PROJECTION q�.y ;'.T o
1•
W1 NUT &
BOLLT T UT &
(2)-WASHERS (NP)
an
.r
PLAN
ELEV 16 00'
ELEV 14 00'
WRAP W/ 7 TURNS OF
- -- -- -
1" DUL GALV WIRE ROPE
ELEV 12.00'
EA TURN STAPLED TO EA
(MLW)
PILE W/ 3T/8,•nx4 3/2" GALV
i
STAPLES (fYP)
1 1
10
20
_ ELEV 8.00'
(MLW)
V -0"
u4 TIES A 6-
ELEVATION
7 - PILE DOLPHIN
SCALE 3/8"- 1'-0
FRAMING BENT PILE CAP PLAN
SCALE 3/4- • 1
w
11' -3-
' PSC PILE
P)
RECESS FOR —
DOCK
ELEV 4 30'
ELEVATION
MOORING PILE CAP
SCALE 3716'. • 1' -0"
PSC
IER PILE
I
* ** Q.%fn#Ki Dmvc+ * **
I— —
L LI
c +4
_
9w �I I
lr
20• PSC PILE
[TYP)
PLAN BOLLARD
T.pn k lP
L
20• PSC FENDER PILE
W/ 4' -0• PROJECTION
(TYP)
20" PSC
BATTER PILE
(TYP)
ELEVATION
BERTHING & MOORING PILE CAP
SCALE 3/16' - 1-0
9'-W OVERALL WIDTH
1 "PREFORMED
EXPANSION JOINT
PRECAST 12" HOLLOW
CAST IN PLACE CORE SLAB -100 PSF LL
6 "x12" TIMBER 2• CONCRETE TOPPING CAPACITY
6" 414- W40xW40 WWWF 6"
EL VARIES FROM 43' -80' %I 1 GROUT FM
w 3EA. R6 BARS U rase
TOP &BOTTOM
1•SD- ANCHOR .9 I A "I �T INSERTS • I I 1 1/4• � x •
• • • TS OUTER W /EMBED INSERT BOLTS W1 NUT &
8' -0" NEOPRENE WASHER
I ° I I
7
FORTIMBERS
I• I I' I I• °I • I•° I I I "1Z I I (21-1• DIAx12• GALV
I I I .� I• I,. I I° I �° I• ANCHORBOTW /NUT&
I, "t - -I . I I I I I I'• I F - I, tl WASHER CrSK (TYP) 2"
LID W&4- THD, 31/2" PRO.
• °
"WOOD
1 I PRECAST OR CAST IN 1 1 FENDERS(TYP)
12 I PLACE PILE CAP I 12 EACH SIDE
14"x14• PRECAST PILING 4
a4 TIES
1'i" 5'i• 1'i• 0 6 "0 G
p MHHW +140 RG CAST IN j�
ME W -7-09 EPDXY GROUT y$
a EA. PILE PERMIT DRAWINGS
TREATED
D FENDERS PRELIMINARY
FRAMING BENT PILE CAP ELEVATION NOT FOR SHEET
SCALE 3/V - V-0' CONSTRUCTION IDENTIFICATION
4 D 4 a 32 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 D 1 2 3 DATE 01/14/13 FIG 11
3/16••1'0• 3/9 "•1' -0" 3/4 "•1'-0' �, ��
+.. ems- _—_ _s • #—I- -- 1— __e—__.Y—_ IL 1"1_..— * *"I
%7UFJpU1 L V aEUW !.L lyn LCrril a Ly - IL F- ay:
20• PSC FENDER PILE
W/ 4' -0• PROJECTION q�.y ;'.T o
of Engh t -
c +4
_
9w �I I
lr
20• PSC PILE
[TYP)
PLAN BOLLARD
T.pn k lP
L
20• PSC FENDER PILE
W/ 4' -0• PROJECTION
(TYP)
20" PSC
BATTER PILE
(TYP)
ELEVATION
BERTHING & MOORING PILE CAP
SCALE 3/16' - 1-0
9'-W OVERALL WIDTH
1 "PREFORMED
EXPANSION JOINT
PRECAST 12" HOLLOW
CAST IN PLACE CORE SLAB -100 PSF LL
6 "x12" TIMBER 2• CONCRETE TOPPING CAPACITY
6" 414- W40xW40 WWWF 6"
EL VARIES FROM 43' -80' %I 1 GROUT FM
w 3EA. R6 BARS U rase
TOP &BOTTOM
1•SD- ANCHOR .9 I A "I �T INSERTS • I I 1 1/4• � x •
• • • TS OUTER W /EMBED INSERT BOLTS W1 NUT &
8' -0" NEOPRENE WASHER
I ° I I
7
FORTIMBERS
I• I I' I I• °I • I•° I I I "1Z I I (21-1• DIAx12• GALV
I I I .� I• I,. I I° I �° I• ANCHORBOTW /NUT&
I, "t - -I . I I I I I I'• I F - I, tl WASHER CrSK (TYP) 2"
LID W&4- THD, 31/2" PRO.
• °
"WOOD
1 I PRECAST OR CAST IN 1 1 FENDERS(TYP)
12 I PLACE PILE CAP I 12 EACH SIDE
14"x14• PRECAST PILING 4
a4 TIES
1'i" 5'i• 1'i• 0 6 "0 G
p MHHW +140 RG CAST IN j�
ME W -7-09 EPDXY GROUT y$
a EA. PILE PERMIT DRAWINGS
TREATED
D FENDERS PRELIMINARY
FRAMING BENT PILE CAP ELEVATION NOT FOR SHEET
SCALE 3/V - V-0' CONSTRUCTION IDENTIFICATION
4 D 4 a 32 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 D 1 2 3 DATE 01/14/13 FIG 11
3/16••1'0• 3/9 "•1' -0" 3/4 "•1'-0' �, ��
+.. ems- _—_ _s • #—I- -- 1— __e—__.Y—_ IL 1"1_..— * *"I
%7UFJpU1 L V aEUW !.L lyn LCrril a Ly - IL F- ay:
+.. ems- _—_ _s • #—I- -- 1— __e—__.Y—_ IL 1"1_..— * *"I
%7UFJpU1 L V aEUW !.L lyn LCrril a Ly - IL F- ay:

GP -56 Supporting Information
Construction and Repair to USARC
Morehead City, North Carolina
US Army Corps Engineers — Wilmington, NC
USARC Contract. No. W912HP -12 -C -0039
REFERENCES
February 26, 2013
1. USFWS — IPaC Natural Resources Reference Report
2. USFWS —Guidelines for Avoiding Impacts to the West Indian Manatee
3. NCDENR Marine Fisheries —Fishery Nursery Areas Map
REFERENCES

rm U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
4
Natural Resources of Concern
This resource list is to be used for planning purposes only — it is not an official species list.
Endangered Species Act species list information for your project is available online and listed below for
the following FWS Field Offices:
RALEIGH ECOLOGICAL SERVICES FIELD OFFICE
POST OFFICE BOX 33726
RALEIGH, NC 27636
(919) 856 -4520
Project Name:
USARMC Pier and Dock Repairs
12/05/2012 Information, Planning, and Conservation System (IPAQ Page 1 of 4
Version 1.4

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Natural Resources of Concern
Project Location Map:
Sugarloaf
Island
NOW
...t End 01
Sugarloaf
Project Counties:
Carteret, NC
Geographic coordinates (Open Geospatial Consortium Well -Known Text, NAD83):
MULTIPOLYGON (((- 76.7098646 34.7249649,-76.703513134.7248238,-76.7039434 34.7218794,
- 76.7101435 34.7223723, - 76.7098646 34.7249649)))
Project Type:
Development
12/05/2012 Information, Planning, and Conservation System (IPAC) Page 2 of 4
Version 1.4
I
�'�� —rL—J I
L I I
TO
Sugarloaf
Island
NOW
...t End 01
Sugarloaf
Project Counties:
Carteret, NC
Geographic coordinates (Open Geospatial Consortium Well -Known Text, NAD83):
MULTIPOLYGON (((- 76.7098646 34.7249649,-76.703513134.7248238,-76.7039434 34.7218794,
- 76.7101435 34.7223723, - 76.7098646 34.7249649)))
Project Type:
Development
12/05/2012 Information, Planning, and Conservation System (IPAC) Page 2 of 4
Version 1.4

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
A
Natural Resources of Concern
Endangered Species Act Species List (USFWS Endan Bred SSpecies Proms .
There are a total of 11 threatened, endangered, or candidate species, and/or designated critical habitat on your species list. Species
on this list are the species that may be affected by your project and could include species that exist in another geographic area. For
example, certain fishes may appear on the species list because a project could cause downstream effects on the species. Please
contact the designated FWS office if you have questions.
Species that may be affected by your project:
Birds
Status
Species Profile
Contact
Piping Plover (Charadrius melodus)
Threatened
sRecies info
Raleigh Ecological Services
Population: except Great Lakes
Field Office
watershed
Red - Cockaded woodpecker
Endangered
species info
Raleigh Ecological Services
(Picoides borealis)
Field Office
Roseate tern (Sterna dougallii dougallh)
Endangered
ssRecies info
Raleigh Ecological Services
Population: northeast U.S. nesting pop.
Field Office
Fishes
Shortnose sturgeon (Acipenser brevirostrum)
Endangered
species info
Raleigh Ecological Services
Field Office
Flowering Plants
Rough- Leaved loosestrife
Endangered
species info
Raleigh Ecological Services
(Lysimachia asperulaefolia)
Field Office
Seabeach amaranth (Amaranthus pumilus)
Threatened
species info
Raleigh Ecological Services
Field Office
Mammals
West Indian Manatee (Mr- bechus manatus)
Endangered
species info
VFe gh Ecological Services
Office
Reptiles
Green sea turtle (Chelonia mydas)
Threatened
species info
Raleigh Ecological Services
Population: except where endangered
Field Office
Hawksbill sea turtle (Era rnochelys imbricata)
Endangered
species info
Raleigh Ecological Services
Field Office
12/05/2012 Information, Planning, and Conservation System (IPAC) Page 3 of 4
Version 1.4

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Natural Resources of Concern
� � K
Kemp's Ridley sea turtle
Endangered
species info
Raleigh Ecological Services
(Lepidochelys kempi)
Field Office
Leatherback sea turtle
Endangered
species info
Raleigh Ecological Services
(Dermochelys coriacea)
Field Office
FWS National Wildlife Refuges (USFWS National Wildlife Refu es Proam).
There are no refuges found within the vicinity of your project.
FWS Migratory Birds (USFWS Migratory Bird Proms).
Most species of birds, including eagles and other raptors, are protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16
U.S.C. 703). Bald eagles and golden eagles receive additional protection under the
Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (16 U.S.C. 668). The Service's Birds of Conservation Concern (2008) report
identifies species, subspecies, and populations of all migratory nongame birds that, without additional
conservation actions, are likely to become listed under the Endangered Species Act as amended (16 U.S.0 1531
et seq.).
NWI Wetlands (USFWS National Wetlands Inventory).
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is the principal Federal agency that provides information on the extent and
status of wetlands in the U.S., via the National Wetlands Inventory Program (NWI). In addition to impacts to
wetlands within your immediate project area, wetlands outside of your project area may need to be considered
in any evaluation of project impacts, due to the hydrologic nature of wetlands (for example, project activities
may affect local hydrology within, and outside of, your immediate project area). It may be helpful to refer to
the USFWS National Wetland Inventory website. The designated FWS office can also assist you. Impacts to
wetlands and other aquatic habitats from your project may be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act, or other State/Federal Statutes. Project Proponents should discuss the relationship of these
requirements to their project with the Regulatory Program of the appropriate
U.S. A= Corps of En &eers Distri ct.
12/05/2012 Information, Planning, and Conservation System (IPAQ Page 4 of 4
Version 1.4

United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Raleigh Field Office
A Post Office Box 33726
4M �' Raleigh, North Carolina 27636 -3726
GUIDELINES FOR AVOIDING IMPACTS TO THE WEST INDIAN MANATEE
Precautionary Measures for Construction Activities in North Carolina Waters
The West Indian manatee (Trichechus manatus), also known as the Florida manatee, is
a Federally - listed endangered aquatic mammal protected under the Endangered Species
Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) and the Marine Mammal Protection Act
of 1972, as amended (16 U.S.0 1461 et seq.). The manatee is also listed as endangered
under the North Carolina Endangered Species Act of 1987 (Article 25 of Chapter 113 of
the General Statutes). The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is the lead Federal
agency responsible for the protection and recovery of the West Indian manatee under the
provisions of the Endangered Species Act.
Adult manatees average 10 feet long and weigh about 2,200 pounds, although some
individuals have been recorded at lengths greater than 13 feet and weighing as much as
3,500 pounds. Manatees are commonly found in fresh, brackish, or marine water habitats,
including shallow coastal bays, lagoons, estuaries, and inland rivers of varying salinity
extremes. Manatees spend much of their time underwater or partly submerged, making
them difficult to detect even in shallow water. While the manatee's principal stronghold in
the United States is Florida, the species is considered a seasonal inhabitant of North
Carolina with most occurrences reported from June through October.
To protect manatees in North Carolina, the Service's Raleigh Field Office has prepared
precautionary measures for general construction activities in waters used by the species.
Implementation of these measure will allow in -water projects which do not require blasting
to proceed without adverse impacts to manatees. In addition, inclusion of these guidelines
as conservation measures in a Biological Assessment or Biological Evaluation, or as part
of the determination of impacts on the manatee in an environmental document prepared
pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act, will expedite the Service's review of the
document for the fulfillment of requirements under Section 7 of the Endangered Species
Act. These measures include:
1. The project manager and /or contractor will inform all personnel associated with the
project that manatees may be present in the project area, and the need to avoid any harm
to these endangered mammals. The project manager will ensure that all construction
personnel know the general appearance of the species and their habit of moving about
completely or partially submerged in shallow water. All construction personnel will be
informed that they are responsible for observing water - related activities for the presence
of manatees.
2. The project manager and /or the contractor will advise all construction personnel that

there are civil and criminal penalties for harming, harassing, or killing manatees which are
protected under the Marine Mammal Protection Act and the Endangered Species Act.
3. If a manatee is seen within 100 yards of the active construction and /or dredging
operation or vessel movement, all appropriate precautions will be implemented to ensure
protection of the manatee. These precautions will include the immediate shutdown of
moving equipment if a manatee comes within 50 feet of the operational area of the
equipment. Activities will not resume until the manatee has departed the project area on
its own volition (i.e., it may not be herded or harassed from the area).
4. Any collision with and /or injury to a manatee will be reported immediately. The report
must be made to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (ph. 919.856.4520 ext. 16), the
National Marine Fisheries Service (ph. 252.728.8762), and the North Carolina Wildlife
Resources Commission (ph. 252.448.1546).
5. A sign will be posted in all vessels associated with the project where it is clearly visible
to the vessel operator. The sign should state:
CAUTION: The endangered manatee may occur in these waters during the warmer
months, primarily from June through October. Idle speed is required if operating
this vessel in shallow water during these months. All equipment must be shut down
if a manatee comes within 50 feet of the vessel or operating equipment. A collision
with and /or injury to the manatee must be reported immediately to the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (919 - 8564520 ext. 16), the National Marine Fisheries Service
(252.728.8762), and the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
(252.448.1546).
6. The contractor will maintain a log detailing sightings, collisions, and /or injuries to
manatees during project activities. Upon completion of the action, the project manager will
prepare a report which summarizes all information on manatees encountered and submit
the report to the Service's Raleigh Field Office.
7. All vessels associated with the construction project will operate at "no wake /idle" speeds
at all times while in water where the draft of the vessel provides less than a four foot
clearance from the bottom. All vessels will follow routes of deep water whenever possible.
8. If siltation barriers must be placed in shallow water, these barriers will be: (a) made of
material in which manatees cannot become entangled; (b) secured in a manner that they
cannot break free and entangle manatees; and, (c) regularly monitored to ensure that
manatees have not become entangled. Barriers will be placed in a manner to allow
manatees entry to or exit from essential habitat.
Prepared by (rev. 06/2003):
U.S. Fish and wildlife Service
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 27636 -3726
919/856 -4520

Figure 1. The whole body of the West Indian manatee may be visible in clear water; but
in the dark and muddy waters of coastal North Carolina, one normally sees only a small
part of the head when the manatee raises its nose to breathe.
M9
Illustration used with the permission of the North Carolina State Museum of Natural Sciences.
Source: Clark, M. K. 1987. Endangered, Threatened, and Rare Fauna of North Carolina: Part I.
A re- evaluation of the mammals. Occasional Papers of the North Carolina Biological Survey 1987-
3. North Carolina State Museum of Natural Sciences. Raleigh, NC. pp. 52.

I`
A), -
i l HarloW Creek .010311 c vl
Newport River .01056 I Xoh
v'
NeiNprt Riv
^G1 .0103
t
1
Core
Cfee ML � -
(
North River
n .010311
D
Eastman Creek -
.010311 c iv
.010311 c iii
Bell Creek rr
010311 c it r
W
.010311 cv ; `fl are Creek _
ter Creek
.010311 ci _ .01055a
j '� Russel Cre North River
ek
Pant
rb Poinr Crab -
�'*
.010311 c viii a
Crab Point Bay
Map Datum:
NAD83
WATERWAY
Map Date:
March 2011
11
.01038ai
Mitchell Creek
l 4�
- i 'Y
0 0.7
City
.0103 8 a ii ' ; �
A1
_ 03 8 b v
Y
,
Gulden Creek ';
Isaac Creek .0103 8 b vi
r rased
This map was produced by the Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
program. Informational data used to create this map were collected from
.,�
Back Creek _
federal, state, county, and private organizations. This map is a general
-
"•._, F^�
Clubfoot Creek
guide to assist the public and is for illustrative purposes only. While every
--
Ia
effort is made to keep this map accurate and up- to-date, it is not intended
z._
to replace any official source. Under no circumstances shall the State of
North Carolina be liable for any actions taken or omissions made from
0103 8 a Clubfoot creek
t
�i
i1
shall the State be liable for any other consequences from any such reliance.
I`
A), -
i l HarloW Creek .010311 c vl
Newport River .01056 I Xoh
v'
NeiNprt Riv
^G1 .0103
t
1
Core
Cfee ML � -
(
North River
n .010311
D
Eastman Creek -
.010311 c iv
.010311 c iii
Bell Creek rr
010311 c it r
W
.010311 cv ; `fl are Creek _
ter Creek
.010311 ci _ .01055a
j '� Russel Cre North River
ek
Pant
rb Poinr Crab -
�'*
.010311 c viii a
Crab Point Bay
Background imagery are U.S. Geological Fishery Nursery Areas Fishery Nursery Areas
Survey 1:100,800 scale planimetric maps. Primary
Permanent Secondary
special Secondary
® Military Danger
Zones and
Restricted Areas
locator map
� Inland waters (wRC jurisdiction) Map 17
Map Datum:
NAD83
WATERWAY
Map Date:
March 2011
Calico Creek .olo311 C V1 Morehead
AW
.010311 b Ii
0.7
0 0.7
City
+ne r s
Turner Creek
,
�
(Gibbs Creek)
r rased
This map was produced by the Geographic Information Systems (GIS)
program. Informational data used to create this map were collected from
.,�
federal, state, county, and private organizations. This map is a general
-
"•._, F^�
guide to assist the public and is for illustrative purposes only. While every
effort is made to keep this map accurate and up- to-date, it is not intended
to replace any official source. Under no circumstances shall the State of
57A78 PART(
North Carolina be liable for any actions taken or omissions made from
reliance on any information contained herein from whatever source nor4
shall the State be liable for any other consequences from any such reliance.
Background imagery are U.S. Geological Fishery Nursery Areas Fishery Nursery Areas
Survey 1:100,800 scale planimetric maps. Primary
Permanent Secondary
special Secondary
® Military Danger
Zones and
Restricted Areas
locator map
� Inland waters (wRC jurisdiction) Map 17
Map Datum:
NAD83
Map Projection: NC State Plane
Map Date:
March 2011
1000
0 1000
2000 Yards
0.7
0 0.7
1.4 Miles

GP -56 Supporting Information US Army Corps Engineers — Wilmington, NC
Construction and Repair to USARC USARC Contract. No. W912HP -12 -C -0039
Morehead City, North Carolina February 26, 2013
USACE PCN APPLICATION
USACE PCN APPLICATION

ot wArIZ9
H 0�
O
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre - Construction Notification C Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
❑Section 404 Permit ®Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 03 or General Permit (GP) number. 197800056
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
® Yes
❑ No
1 d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
® Yes ❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
❑ Yes
® No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
® Yes
❑ No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
® Yes
❑ No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Constrcution and Repair to the United States Army Reserve Center
2b. County:
Carteret
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Morehead City
2d. Subdivision name:
NA
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
NA
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
United States of America
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
Not Recorded Locally
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
NA
3d. Street address:
410 Fisher Street
3e. City, state, zip:
Morehead City, North Carolina,
3f. Telephone no.:
[phone]
3g. Fax no.:
NA
3h. Email address:
NA
Page 1 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
❑ Agent ® Other, specify: Owner
4b. Name:
DPW Frank D. Eubanks
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
United States Army - 81St Regional Command Center
4d. Street address:
1525 Marion Avenue
4e. City, state, zip:
Fort Jackson, SC 29207
4f. Telephone no.:
(803) 751 -9653
4g. Fax no.:
(803) 751 -9631
4h. Email address:
frank.d.eubanks.civ @mail.mil
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
John Kato
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
OTAK Group Inc.
5c. Street address:
96126 MT Zion Loop
5d. City, state, zip:
Yulee, FL 32097
5e. Telephone no.:
904 -225 -2588
5f. Fax no.:
904 -225 -1001
5g. Email address:
johnkatojr @otakgroup.com
Page 2 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
638620828084000
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 34.72302 Longitude: - 76.707458
(DD.DDDDDD) (- DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size:
5.2 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
Newport River
proposed project:
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water.
SA; HQW
2c. River basin:
White Oak
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project site consists of a training facility, shop facility, panting lot, boat ramp, bulk land storage areas, two docks: the
LCU 1600 Pier and East Dock, and two shore areas where piling was previously driven and installed. Thefacility is home
port to several service landing craft vessels owned bu the US Army including the LCU 2000 class and LCM-8 class.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
Exact amount unknown; amount located in project area is 0.0 acres.
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
0.0 LF
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the proposed project is repair and upgrade existing bulkheads, piers and docks, along with the addition of
a new dock located at the U.S. Army Reserve Center Facitly to support the continued training and mission of Landing
Craft Utility (LCU) vessels by the U.S. Army.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project includes repairing and maintaining existing site features such as crushed rock drives, docks,and bulkheads to
their orginal condition. Additionally, the project includes upgrading an existing dock and the addition of a new dock. See
attached write -up for specific construction information. Equipment to be used includes shallow draft barges equipped with
pile driving equipment, and earthwork equipment for grading and paving activities.
4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
El Yes [I No ®Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments: No wetlandsexist within the construction limits
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
❑ preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company:
Name (if known):
Other.
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
Yes ❑ No ® Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
The project was designed and constructed nearly 20 years ago. It is assumed that the proper permits were obtained at
that time. However, the agent does not possess or have knowledge of past permits or records.
Page 3 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? ❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 4 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑ Wetlands ❑ Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
® Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
TemDorary
W1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P [IT
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ Corps
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.0
2h. Comments: No wetlands shall be impacted by the proposed project.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h. Total stream and
tributary impacts
0.0
3i. Comments: No streams or tributaries shall be impacted by the proposed project.
Page 5 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 ❑ P ®T
Newport
River /Calico Creek
Installation of Docks and Piers
Estuary/Ocean
0.070
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑ PEI T
04 ❑P ❑T
4L Total open water impacts
0.070
4g. Comments: Impacts only include NEW construction, and will be temporary and BMPs shall be used during construction.
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID
number
5b.
Proposed use or purpose
of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5E Total
0.0
5g. Comments: No pond or lake construction
will occur for the proposed project.
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes 0 N If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
Page 6 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse El Tar-Pamlico El Other
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g.
Buffer impact
number—
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary
impact
required?
B1 ❑ PEI T
El Yes
❑ No
B2 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑P ❑T
El Yes
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
61. Comments: No riparian buffer impacts will occur for the proposed project.
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
The proposed design using concrete piling rather than timber piling to reduce bottom impacts.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Best Management Practices to be used to minimize impacts include silt fence and turbidity curtains.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
project?
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete If Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank: N/A
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
Page 7 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3c. Comments: N/A
4. Complete If Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments: N/A
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
N/A
6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
[]Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
N/A
6h. Comments: N/A
Page 8 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
❑ Yes ❑ No
Comments:
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
90%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
A Stormwater management plan is not required since the project site is currently permitted as a high density stormwater
facility by NCDENR. A sediment and erosion control (E &SC) plan is being prepared for the proposed activity, and shall
be submitted to the local agent or NCDENR for approval. Construction will not commence until the plan is approved.
Stormwater discharges during construction shall comply with NCDENR General Permit — NCG 010000 under the NPDES;
coverage under this permit shall be granted upon approval of the E &SC Plan. No stormwater permit modifications or
other requirements are needed, since the proposed activity is a maintenance activity and does not alter, modify, or
change the existing site plan, other than the addition of a dock. Therefore existing high density stormwater permit
SW8931109 shall remain valid and no further stormwater permitting is required.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
❑ Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local governments jurisdiction is this project?
Federal Government, NPDES
❑ Phase 11
3b. Which of the following locally- implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
El USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
® Other: NPDES
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
® Other: GP Cert No. 3883
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
Page 9of11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
la. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /stateAocal) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (if so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments: N/A
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Welland Rules (15A NCAC 2H.1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 213 .0200)?
2b. Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s): N/A
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
N/A
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non - discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The proposed site is connected to the City of Morehead's public water and sewer system. No new additional waste will be
generated as part of the proposed project.
Page 10 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requiremenq
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑Yes ® No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
®Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. if yes, Indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
® Raleigh
❑ Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
IPaC on -fine Planning System For Natural Resources, US Fish and Wildlife
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or now an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
,NCDENR
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur In or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
Yes No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. ' What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would Impact historic or archeological resources?
Previously disturbed site. Propsoed projct is primarily maintenance activities.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA designated 100 -year ffoodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: No fill activites are proposed.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodpiain determination? FEMA Map, Zone AE
DPW Frank D. Eubanks e
;; C6 1�
ZCa /W 7013
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
AppiicanUAgenre Signature
Date
(herd's softwe is vaW only if an authalza*m latter from the eWcam
is
Page 11 of 11
PCN Form — Version 1.8 December 10, 2008 Version