20130125 Ver 1_401 Application_20130213

20 130 12 5
January 2, 2013
NC Division of Water Quality- 401/Wetlands Unit
Attn: Cyndi Karoly
512 N. Salisbury St.,
Raleigh, NC 27604
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
797 Haywood Road
Suite 201
Asheville, NC 28806
828 - 3501408
FAX [phone]
� Z&FUR
Subject: Preconstruction Notification and request for Clean Water Act (CWA) §404 and 401
permits for the construction of the Ross Creek Watershed Improvements Project. Ross
Creek (Lake Kenilworth), Asheville, North Carolina, French Broad River Basin — CU#
06010105, Buncombe County, NC.
Dear Ms. Karoly:
Enclosed with this letter are five (5) copies of the Pre - Construction Notification, project plan set,
and an electronic version of these materials. I have also attached'to the PCN a check for $570.00
to cover the application fee. We have also submitted this information to the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission and N.C. Land
Quality Section for their review. We are providing this information for your department's
consideration and comments relative to 401 permitting.
The unnamed tributary to Ross Creek (Kenilworth Lake) is designated as Class B waters by the
Division of Water Quality. The attached plans should provide the information needed to evaluate
this permit request and we are prepared to meet with personnel from your office to further discuss
the project, if you so desire.
We believe that the proposed activities are necessary to address existing sedimentation problems
and should provide long -term improvements that will reduce sediment loading into Kenilworth
Lake and Ross Creek, while improving in- stream habitat at this site. In addition to making every
effort to avoid impacting mature trees on -site, we will be planting diverse native herbaceous and
woody vegetation that should provide further long -term stability. The results of this project will
improve habitat at this site for native aquatic and terrestrial species and will provide long -term
water quality protection.
Thank you for your consideration of this request. If you have any questions, please contact me as
soon as possible at 828 - 350.1408 ext. 2007 or by email at jmcleanAmbakercorp.com. Your
timely review will be appreciated.
Sincerely, Q V
Yi Khaeer n� ng, Inc. Lean, P.E.
FEB 0 8 2013
Cc: Ms. Karen Cragnolin, Executive Director
RiverLink, Inc.

20130 125
ROSS CREEK WATERSHED ENHANCEMENT - UMHAU PROPERTY
AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION: DEEDBOOK 4731 PAGE 1047
PLATBOOK 0014 PAGE 0076
LOT NO. N/A PLAN N0. N/A PARCEL ID: PIN 964884912300000
STREET ADDRESS: LAKEWOOD DR. AT INTERSECTION OF WAVERLY ROAD
ASHEVILLE, NC (SUBDIVISION: LAKEWOOD PARK, NO HOUSE NUMBER)
Please print:
Property Owner: John C. Umhau
Property Owner: Patricia H. Umhau '
The undersigned, registered property owners of the above noted property, do hereby authorize
Karen Cragnolin or Nancy Hodges of
(Contractor / Agent)
RiverLink
(Name of consulting firm)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary for the processing, Issuance and acceptance of
this permit or certification and any and all standard and special conditions attached.
Property Owner's Address (if different than property above):
10804 Rock Run Drive, Potomac, Maryland 20854 D � % leg
Telephone: [phone]
FFR 0 8 2013
NR . WATV. 6UALIT
W a S mmatv Brae
We hereby certify the above information submitted In this application Is true and accurate to the
best of our knowledge.
DINAZ DARUWALA
Notary Public
Montgomery County
Maryland
My Commission Expires Feb 9. 2015
-3I_13
Aut orized Signature
Date: ©/" ;3 /- — /3
DINAZ DARUWALA
Notary Public
Montgomery County
Maryland
My Commission Expires Feb 9. 2015

Re: Written consent for RiverLink to pursue Ross Creek Watershed Enhancement
erosion control and other City of Asheville permits: Umhau Property on Lakewood
Drive (PIN 964884912300000)
As the property owner for the above referenced property, I understand that RiverLink, or
its authorized Agent, is applying for erosion control and grading permits through the City
of Asheville, and, as applicable, the NC Division of Land Quality, and 401/404
permitting through the other respective agencies for the above referenced project that is
to occur on my property. These permits are for the Clean Water Management Trust Fund
grant- funded activities proposed including stream restoration and enhancement and
stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs).
I.(We) _6c 'it bwledge the use of our property to conduct these activities. I am granting a
tepqasement for construction as shown on the plans dated 12/31/2012. 1(We)
understand that RiverLink is the Financially Responsible Party for the project and give
consent for kiverLink to pursue these permits.
This form is merely to state that the owner acknowledges that RiverLink will be
conducting the referenced project on their property and to give consent to RiverLink, as
required by the Division of Land Resources, City of Asheville, and others, to pursue the
necessary permitting it requires to conduct said activities.
Cand Owner Signature)
Zg a /3 (Date)
Land Owner Signature)
4 ,/— 3/ — / 3 (Date)
(INCLUDE SEAL OF NOTARY BELOW)
Q \, c,�P" -Z. _ I.3,. 13
DINAZ DARUWAtA
Notary Public
Montgomery County
Maryland
Commission Expires Feb 9. 2015

`o�ot warFgoc
t�/1 r
o <
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre - Construction Notification C Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1 a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps:
®Section 404 Permit ❑Section 10 Permit
1 b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 18 & 27 or General Permit (GP) number:
1 c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
Flo Yes
❑ No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
® 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non -404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
❑ Yes ® No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ® No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in -lieu
fee program.
El Yes
®No
1g. Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes
® No
1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project:
Ross Creek Watershed Improvements: Umhau Stormwater BMP
2b. County:
Buncombe
2c. Nearest municipality / town:
Asheville
2d. Subdivision name:
Lakewood Park (Kennilworth Lake area)
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no:
N/A
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
John and Patricia Umhau
3b. Deed Book and Page No.
4731, p.1047
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d. Street address:
10804 Rock Run Drive
3e. City, state, zip:
Potomac, MD 20854
3f. Telephone no.:
240 - 338 -0980
3g. Fax no.:
n/a
3h. Email address: I
[e-mail]
Page 1 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is:
® Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b. Name:
Karen Cragnolin, Executive Director
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
RiverLink
4d. Street address:
P.O. Box 15488
4e. City, state, zip:
Asheville, NC 28813 -0488
4f. Telephone no.:
828.252.8474
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
[e-mail]
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name:
Jake McLean, P.E.
5b. Business name
(if applicable):
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
5c. Street address:
797 Haywood Road, Ste. 201
5d. City, state, zip:
Asheville, NC 28806
5e. Telephone no.:
828.350.1408 ext. 2007
5f. Fax no.:
828.350.1409
5g. Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
964884912300000
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.578733 Longitude: -
82.534281
(DD.DDDDDD) (- DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size:
1.32 acres
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to
proposed project:
Unnamed tributary to Ross Creek (Kennilworth Lake)
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
B
2c. River basin:
French Broad
Page 3 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3.
Project Description
3a.
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project site consists of a small, unnamed tributary to Ross Creek (Kennilworth Lake) and an abutting wetland. Both
tributary and wetland are located in a constricted valley setting and are bounded by Waverly Road and a walking trail /soil
access road (to sanitary sewer easement). General land use in the area consists of a long- established residential
development and a corresponding network of roads.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
0.022
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
1050
3d.
Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
This project is a stormwater BMP with complementary stream enhancement that supports goals outlined in the Ross
Creek Watershed Plan. The goal of the project is to help improve water quality and avoid the need for a TMDL for Ross
Creek (Kennilworth Lake) by reducing excessive siltation threatening the lake.
3e.
Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The project site is a natural stream corridor in a park -like setting but with residential and urban impacts that have resulted
in stream down- cutting. Activities proposed include removal of invasive species, native species planting and
bioengineering measures, and in- stream structures that will vertically stabilize the channel and prevent further erosion
and sedimentation. The stormwater BMP is located on -line with the existing stream, an atypical location and one that is
typically not desirable for stormwater management features due to the increased potential for maintenance concerns and
ecological impacts. This site, however, is in the location of a previously modified culvert that has been serving a similar
function (to the function of the proposed stormwater BMP) in trapping sediment prior to its introduction into the lake. The
project area has become silted in and is in need of maintenance, however the current configuration is not conducive to
regular maintenance.
The proposed project will remove previously deposited sediment from behind the boarded -up culvert and install a
stormwater wetland that will serve as a depositional area that is to receive regular maintenance and sections of
streambed reestablishment on the upstream and downstream ends of the stormwater wetland. The stormwater wetland
consists of an "S" shaped practice that will allow for maintenance equipment access. Part of the area is currently a
jurisdictional wetland that has been created as a result of the culvert modifications and ensuing inundation of the
floodplain bench, which was an area of deposition for silts and sands that subsequently became hydric. The other part of
the area is a perennial stream that has lost most of its stream functions due to the influence of the culvert and subsequent
deposition of mud that has filled the previously existing channel. The project will also make stream restoration
enhancements to ensure that upstream knick points are permanently stabilized and to reestablish a natural stream profile
in the vicinity (upstream and downstream) of the stormwater wetland feature.
The project will use tracked construction equipment (a trackhoe is expected to be the primary piece of equipment) in the
disturbance area to reduce loading from heavy equipment, but of sufficient size to reduce the length of time during which
the area is disturbed. The area will be dewatered and base flow will be diverted and pumped around. Construction is
scheduled for February of 2013.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
project (including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
preliminary ❑ Final
of determination was made?
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company:
Name (if known):
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Page 4 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b. If yes, explain.
Page 5 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
® Wetlands ® Streams - tributaries ❑ Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
Page 6 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
2b.
2c.
2d.
2e.
2f.
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps - 404, 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ — non -404, other)
(acres)
Tem ora
W1 ® P ❑ T
NW18, Dredging
❑ Yes
® Corps
0.022
and minor fill
® No
® DWQ
W2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P [IT
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g. Total wetland impacts
0.022
2h. Comments: Total fill below O.H.W. for NW18 impacts calculated as 17.5 Cubic Yards (includes total fill applied to streams
and wetlands)
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
3b.
3c.
3d.
3e.
3f.
3g.
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number -
(PER) or
(Corps - 404, 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non -404,
width"
(linear
Temporary m
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
NW18,
Unnamed
S1 ®P ❑ T
Implementation of
Tributary to Ross
® PER
® Corps
10 -15
31
stormwater
Ck (Kennilworth
❑INT
® DWQ
wetland
Lake)
NW27, Stream
Unnamed
S2 ❑ P ® T
channel
Tributary to Ross
® PER
® Corps
restoration and
Ck (Kennilworth
❑ INT
® DWQ
10 -15
31
bank enh.
Lake)
NW27, Stream
Unnamed
S3 ❑ P ®T
channel
Tributary to Ross
® PER
® Corps
6
restoration and
Ck (Kennilworth
❑ INT
® DWQ
94
bank enh.
Lake)
NW27, Stream
Unnamed
S4 ❑ P ® T
channel
Tributary to Ross
❑ PER
❑ Corps
g
restoration and
Ck (Kennilworth
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
21
bank enh.
Lake)
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
TO
PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
31
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
(NW18)
146
(NW27)
3i. Comments: Total fill below O.H.W. for NW18 impacts calculated as 17.5 Cubic Yards (includes total fill applied to streams
Page 7 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
4b.
4c.
4d.
4e.
Open water
impact number —
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Tem ora
01 ❑P ❑T
02 ❑P ❑T
-03 ❑ P ❑ T
04 [:]POT
4E Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If Pond or lake construction Proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.
5b.
5c.
5d.
5e.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
number
of pond
P1
P2
5L Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
S. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar - Pamlico ❑ Other:
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b.
6c.
6d.
6e.
6f.
6g•
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary
impact
required?
❑Yes
B1 ❑P ❑T
❑ No
El
B2 ❑P ❑T
[] ❑ No
❑Yes
B3 ❑P ❑T
❑ No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
Page 8 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
1
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ® No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
❑ Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete If Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
3c. Comments:
4. Complete If Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
❑ warm ❑ cool ❑cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non - riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete If Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 9 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ❑ No
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 10 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑ Yes ® No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments:
Yes ❑ No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
0%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: Less than one acre of disturbance will
occur. There are no existing or proposed impervious cover elements. The project is a voluntary grant - funded stormwater
best management practice (stormwater wetland) intended to improve water quality from non -point source watershed
impacts.
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Certified Local Government
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government's jurisdiction is this project?
Asheville
❑ Phase 11
3b. Which of the following locally- implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑ No
attached?
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
4a. Which of the following state - implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ HQW
❑ ORW
(check all that apply):
❑ Session Law 2006 -246
❑ Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 11 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state/local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
1 b. If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
❑ Yes ® No
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c. If you answered "yes' to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes ❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
❑ Yes ® No
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b. Is this an after - the -fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c. If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
❑ Yes ® No
3b. If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non- discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Page 12 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
® Yes ❑ No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
® Yes ❑ No
impacts?
Raleigh
❑
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
® Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
On -site review, review of the NC Natural Heritage Element Occurrence Database, review of USFWS T &E species list for
Buncombe County; Correspondence with the USFWS and NCWRC. NCWRC has responded, USFWS comments
pending.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
® Yes ® No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to, determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
On -site review of State Historic Preservation Office website
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA- designated 100 -year floodplain?
❑ Yes ® No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? Review of a FIRM which covers the project area;
additional confirmation by communication with a consultant with a CFM certification.
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Applicant/Agent's Signature
Date
(Agents signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)
Page 13 of 13
PCN Form — Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Rocs Cr, A'Austie fm(l'is Qni,eci Clty/County. A kv, Il-e Sampling Date: I I t � 2
Applicant/Owner. 02144 UA IC State: �_ Sampling Paint: _
Investigator(s): Z A441rJ:T4 (tr`' Section, Township, Range: J<i~ fl rW A-
Landfonn (hilislope, terrace, eta): ✓A��r tic ^c r nt Local relit 3(concave, convex, none): C� rt c Av t Slope (�): — 0 '2 l
{� Coop,
Subregion (LRR oL.L : 130 Q Let: S. S Q Long: & Z. 53 Datum: 000 83
Soil Map Unit Name: T/1TF_ /f0 A 'A, WDI FLUv tl 'f $ NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for thlo time of year? Yes No -" (If no, explain In Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are 'Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes " No is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes -- No
Remarks:
r rlo►� (w I ws) /wvt,1( P50 DA01 • ADA73 rMA JN�1 -fio o-4 S Tod of SWPC
Di?aKd►I-r Coti01-1 \oniS P -niAC- of &%4(zVleJ
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reauired)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reoulred: check all that annW
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
ZSaturatlon (A3)
— Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
_ Moss Trim Lines (816)
_ Water Marks (131)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry- Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Solis (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
— Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (85)
✓Geomorphlc Position (D2)
_ Jnundatlan Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water•Stafned Leaves (89)
_ Microtopographic Relief (134)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC- Neutral Test (135)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
Depth (Inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
Depth Qnches):
_V
Saturation Present? Yes 1_ No
Depth (Inches): u
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes caoillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous Inspections), If available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use sclenttflc names of plants.
Tree Stratum (Plot size: )
Cover ec a Status
1. _ 0- Xodi
u un 11 1 RiGti.
FACW species
2. Are, ne
✓odo L.
--�-
3. -1<.14A
x 4 =
F
4, (qL"/,f
"-'rf vtc, n/p yr f
t�
5. 4hhingbami^
1Q0Ce01A �61A✓tA'
N
6.
7.
8.
=Total Cover
Saollno /Shrub
Stratum (Plot size: )
1. ke ""(
r G(o L.
N _ _ FAQ
T
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
w
V
9.
10.
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum
(Plot size: )
1. I4crie'(4
1Vfo(
`
2. Yo6y1I'l4HNM
1jrfJS4iekaides
3. Vtivi&As, Cyr /A C4eS
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover
Woody Vlne Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
6.
= Total Cover
Sampling Point: 4_
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 5-0 (A/B)
Total % Cover of
Multiply by:
OBL species
X 1 =
FACW species
x2=
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 6 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
fRapid Test for Hydrophytiq Vegetation
- Dominance Test Is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index la s3.0�
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptatlonal (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophydc Vegetation (Explain)
'Indicators of hyddc soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 In. (7.8 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DSH), regardless of
height.
SeplinglShrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 31n. DSH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb -All herbaoedus (non - woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants lose than 3281t tall.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? yes t/ No
(arks: (include pnoto numoers nere or an a separate sneer.)
ti�nc�ers}•� "� - �n.e- yi��rrn,, S CQ�e,� sparse A-' hei,e .��` s�rU►�
�OMrn�1� ar-ee 5pee-01 pi/ejeA + et-l- Ka-, AFyc (9ft lr or f ;a' e iTh. }NS
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL
or
Sampling Point: A I
Depth Matrix Rednx Features
(inchesl _ Color (moist) % Color (moist) ° _ TV01e—= Texture Remarks
'• - !' _ 15,frt 5 A iZ-m Wl rlrap i i0al -,
I
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solis':
Histosoi (Al)
— Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Hisllc Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147,148)
(MLRA 147,148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
,Loamy Oleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Solis (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (P3)
(MLRA 136,147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F8)
_ Red Parent Material (72)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al1)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
�Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ iron- Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147,148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Oleyed Matrix (34)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136,122)
'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
— Piedmont Floodplain Soils (Fig) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Type:
Depth (inches):
GMILO 501k, P�FSL or
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Interim Version
i
i

UPL- 1
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
ProJectlSite: ROSS G. WAtUCIACA `N /Crnr&4r 624eci City /County: Ashe- le. Sampling Date: f / i2
Applicant/Owner. R i vex b n 1C State: Sampling Paint: - Z
Investigator(s): /_, M '—1 y4 a r r p Section, Township, Range N wO TW fJ ZT- A-
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): LOA D SFIO ✓t,OVK A r LL SW Local relief concave, convex, none): /VO, J Slope (%): S- l 0'
lxnaiEl S'i �
A
Subregion (LRR or LR : JSa9 Lar 35, S5c Long: ' �Z. 5 3 Datum: N�19 f3
Soil Map Unit Name: A-Te LOAwl NW! classlficatlon:
Are climatic f hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yea No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation . Soll or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes / No
Are Vegetation . Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers In Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yea No
Is the Sampled
Hyddc Sol[ Present? Yea No /
within a Wetland? Area
Yea No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Peog6 /(7 emi 0l7i o uS co Tr n� G or Su rLJ��
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two reaulmd)
Primary indicators (minimum of one Is reautred:
check all that soolv)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (SO)
_„ Surface Water (A1)
_ True Aquatic Plants (814)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living
Roots (0) _ Moss Tdm Lines (B18)
_, Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry-Season WaterTable (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (82)
_ Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Solis (CS) ,,,,_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_, Drift Deposits (B3)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
— Saturation Visible on Aerial imagery (C9)
_, Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
— Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_, Iron Deposits (B6)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
_ Water - Stained Leaves (89)
_ Microtopogrephlc Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAGNeutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
/ Depth (Inches):
Water Table Present? Yea No
Depth (Inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth Qnches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Nom'
ncludes ca III fdn
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), If available:
Remarks:
A<HPV)t,I.0 IWP 0(Cd,-W6
p Flo, 60 r c rlur`fIoo P -Tim E or svf/Zvt_
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont— Interim Version

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:_
Tree Stratum
1. D_) �
(Plot size: )
d e h d ✓ A ivy a r )nor r. o v,
Cover Sec Status
N He L4
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (AB)
2. /7ArL v r R, I 4 �
-
3. tA'4 W e, a k �wS'S F rt ,u
4. Li�r1 o�1Cn`(i0n {dlinl e✓q _ f-A-C-A
5. QJP.ICu S r ✓ �l✓Gi rriCJ
T.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total Yo Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 a
FAC species x3=
FACUI species x4=
UPL species x 5 a
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
8
= Total Cover
Sapling /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
8.
7
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1- Rapid Test for Hydrophyda Vegetation
_ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_, 3 - Prevalence index 19 :93.01
-- 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
8.
g
10
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1. f! "r- h e J l (L •
�
2. Pp4ySTIC.HNnn AGr01- iici,o�c{es uP�-
3
4.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.8 cm) or
more In diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
heighL
SepltnglShrub -Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 it (1 m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine -All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft In
height.
5.
8
7.
8.
g.
10.
11
12.
Woody Vine Stratum
1.
(Plot aize: )
= Total Cover
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
2.
3.
4.
5•
8,
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
Mare i ✓y rn f4f),00111RI'CA WIAr I/Alje.j -040.
P ah�nF ,,1 -Irec �'a.r..ase ('o�s,5�s �� FfI��fPPpiCs
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Interim Version

SOIL
to
or
Sampling Point: h -
Depth Matrix
(Inches) Color (molst Color (moistl % Texture Remarks
40q 1 7 Oo'l, fG n iG TA/d' %,1aai4
Hydrtc Boll Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydrtc Soils':
_ Histosol (A1)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147,148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Hisfic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (Sg) (MLRA 147,148)
(MLRA 147,148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (172)
_ Piedmont Floodplaln Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136,147)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F8)
_ Red Parent Material (TF2)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR N,
_ Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147,148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (84)
_ Umbria Surface (F13) (MLRA 136,122)
'indicators of hydrophydc vegetation and
_ Sandy Redox (85)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wefiand hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Type:
Depth (inches):
Hydrtc Soll Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Interim Version

tl fi
J, }
t,
I\ �
l
l
Proposed Stormwater BMP
lti ur) t
1 )7pU�t`fj ISiij
`! i, �l._.i (�� [ I iiof v'^. \fi'I d�!` ;'r�` f ✓ r� �'' / �i` / �' i IAA � �. !)r!�`•�� �� �...-
i
►'
1��:Olt,
Yll
USGS Topographic Map
Ross
Creek Watershed Improvements Project
Proposed Stormwater BMP
lti ur) t
1 )7pU�t`fj ISiij
`! i, �l._.i (�� [ I iiof v'^. \fi'I d�!` ;'r�` f ✓ r� �'' / �i` / �' i IAA � �. !)r!�`•�� �� �...-
i
Yll
USGS Topographic Map
Ross
Creek Watershed Improvements Project
Proposed Stormwater BMP Site
• �a
Buncombe County, NC
�'•
0
500 1,000 2,000
• > •
Feet

BbY�iSl�Y�]Y
K41W& SY
Map Scale: 1:3,450 if printed on A size (8.5"x 11 ") sheet
io
"' Meters
" N
N 0 45 90 180 270 m
°D Feet
0 150 300 600 900
USDA Natural Resources
a" Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey
Boll INebG@hGCGP bW8O+1 AGlQWr,stollus
11/19/2012
Page 1 of 3
35° 34'50"
35" 34'34"

Soil Map– Buncombe County, North Carolina
MAP LEGEND
MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOI)
Very Stony Spot
Map Scale: 1:3,450 if printed on A size (8.5" x 11 ") sheet.
r—
Area of Interest (AOI)
+t Wet Spot
The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:12,000.
Soils
y Other
Soil Map Units
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Special Line Features
Special
Point Features
Gully
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
Blowout
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line
Short Steep Slope
placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting
®
Borrow Pit
soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.
.� . Other
X
Clay Spot
Political Features
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for accurate map
Closed Depression
0 Cities
measurements.
Gravel Pit
Water Features
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Gravelly Spot
Streams and Canals
Web Soil Survey URL: http : / /websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov
Coordinate System: UTM Zone 17N NAD83
(g)
Landfill
'transportation
This product is generated from the USDA -NRCS certified data as of
A
Lava Flow
+++ Rails
the version date(s) listed below.
al&
Marsh or swamp"
Interstate Highways
Soil Survey Area: Buncombe County, North Carolina
4R
Mine or Quarry
-- US Routes
Survey Area Data: Version 8, Jul 2, 2012
O
Miscellaneous Water
_ % Major Roads
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: 8/2/2006
O
Perennial Water
. Local Roads
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
Is
Rock Outcrop
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting
+
Saline Spot
of map unit boundaries may be evident.
Sandy Spot
Severely Eroded Spot
(y
Sinkhole
3>
Slide or Slip
0
Sodic Spot
_,
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 11/19/2012
� Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3

Soil Map— Buncombe County, North Carolina
Map Unit Legend
Buncombe County, North Carolina (NCO21)
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in AOI
Percent of AOI
CuB
CuC
Clifton -Urban land complex, 2 to 8
percent slopes
2.1
12.8
3.8%
23.1%
0.9%
10.8%
Clifton -Urban land complex, 8 to 15
percent slopes
DAM
Dam
0.5
EwD
Evard -Cowee complex, 15 to 30
percent slopes, stony
6.0
ExD
Evard - Cowee -Urban land complex, 15
to 30 percent slopes
22.2
40.1%
TaC
Tate loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes
5.8
10.5%
W
Water
5.9
10.7%
Totals for Area of Interest
55.5
100.0%
USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 11/1a2u IL
am Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3

Wetland and tributary to Ross Creek (Kennilworth Lake).
Wetland abutting tributary.

.� ", sue`, L� 1 x .. � y� "� �, ? '•'i}
• w ,� + �.y _ J� ♦ fit. ♦, t^ ��,,yy �}
�} �:�� i � • ,� '° �' ,may s
d ,
Pit
Y P `tee k
l
' xy- ^�•'i- . k? z� t .�' �..� �'Y fie° a♦
T �y !R•1 � _ '� a.. � a�.'s�'-•�'-', Vii, -; .. - I -�Y' �T` - �% ta:
y # sue: °�i. , .,� �_` ��� ?�� `" ° .+►�y� �� :. �_ — � ,l. _ '

December 11, 2012
N.C. Wildlife Resources Commission
Attn: Mr. Dave McHenry
Balsam Depot
20830 Great Smoky Mountain Expressway
Waynesville, NC 28786
Subject: Ross Creek Watershed Improvements Project, Asheville, NC
Dear Mr. McHenry,
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc. proposes to implement a stormwater best management practice (BMP)
in coordination with RiverLink at a site off of Waverly Road near Kennilworth Lake (see images enclosed
for project location). The stormwater BMP is proposed to support goals outlined in the Ross Creek
Watershed Plan. The goal of the project is to help improve water quality and avoid the need for a TMDL
for Ross Creek (Kennilworth Lake) by reducing excessive siltation threatening the lake. The stormwater
BMP will involve the enhancement of approximately 280 linear feet of an unnamed tributary to Ross
Creek (Kennilworth Lake) and an abutting wetland. Both the channel and the wetland have silted in
overtime as a result of attempts by the community to prevent sediment from reaching Kennilworth
Lake.
Best management practices proposed for the site include: removal of accumulated silt and exotic,
invasive vegetation, replanting the site with native vegetation, and implementation of instream
structures and other bioengineering measures that will vertically stabilize the channel and prevent
further erosion and sedimentation.
The purpose of this letter is to request the agency's review and comment on any possible issues that
might emerge with respect to fish and wildlife issues associated with the proposed stormwater BMP
project at said location. Images of the project site as well as a USGS map showing the project location
are enclosed.
We thank you in advance for your timely response and cooperation. Please feel free to contact us with
any questions that you may have concerning the extent of site disturbance associated with this project.
Sincerely,
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
Carmen Horne - McIntyre

December 11, 2012
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Attn: Mr. Brian Cole
160 Zillicoa St.
Asheville, NC 28801
Subject: Ross Creek Watershed Improvements Project, Asheville, NC
Dear Mr. Cole,
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc. proposes to implement a stormwater best management practice (BMP)
in coordination'with RiverLink at a site off of Waverly Road near Kennilworth Lake (see images enclosed
for project location). The stormwater BMP is proposed to support goals outlined in the Ross Creek
Watershed Plan. The goal of the project is to help improve water quality and avoid the need for a TMDL
for Ross Creek (Kennilworth Lake) by reducing excessive siltation threatening the lake. The stormwater
BMP will involve the enhancement of approximately 280 linear feet of an unnamed tributary to Ross
Creek (Kennilworth Lake) and an abutting wetland. Both the channel and the wetland have silted in
overtime as a result of attempts by the community to prevent sediment from reaching Kennilworth
Lake.
Best management practices proposed for the site include: removal of accumulated silt and exotic,
invasive vegetation, replanting the site with native vegetation, and implementation of instream
structures and other bioengineering measures that will vertically stabilize the channel and prevent
further erosion and sedimentation.
We have already obtained an updated species list for Buncombe County from your website (htt://nc-
es.fws.gov /es /countyfr.htmi).
The threatened or endangered species for Buncombe
County are as
follows:
Scientific Name
Common Name
Federal Status
Microhexura montivaga
Spruce -fir moss spider
E
Geum Radiatum
Spreading avens
E
Gymnoderma lineare
Rock gnome lichen
E
Myotis grisescens
Gray bat
E
Glaucomys sabrinus
Carolina northern flying squirrel
E
Clemmys muhlengbergii
Bog turle
T(SA)
USFWS updated 1213112

We are requesting that you please provide any known information for each species in the county.
The USFWS will be contacted if suitable habitat for any listed species is found or if we determine that
the project may adversely affect one or more federally listed species or designated critical habitat.
Please provide comments on any possible issues that might emerge with respect to endangered species,
migratory birds, or other trust resources from the proposed stormwater BMP project at said location.
Images of the project site as well as a USGS map showing the project location are enclosed.
If we have not heard from you in 30 days we will assume that our species list is correct, that you do not
have any comments regarding associated laws, and that you do not have any information relevant to
this project at the current time.
We thank you in advance for your timely response and cooperation. Please feel free to contact us with
any questions that you may have concerning the extent of site disturbance associated with this project.
Sincerely,
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
Carmen Horne - McIntyre

® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Gordon Myers, Executive Director
December 17, 2012
Carmen Horne- McIntyre
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
797 Haywood Road, Suite 201
Asheville, NC 28806
SUBJECT. Ross Creek Watershed Project, Buncombe County
Dear Mrs. Horne- McIntyre:
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (Commission) received your
December 11, 2012 letter about the proposed stream and wetland project on Rosss Creek in Buncombe
County. Comments from the Commission on this proposal are offered for your consideration under
provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.).
Buncombe County is a "trout county" under an agreement between the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(ACOE) and the Commission. As such, Commission biologists review all Nationwide Permit
applications there and make recommendations to minimize the adverse effects of some activities,
including restoration work, on aquatic habitats. Although the project will not harm trout, a copy of the
permit application, if required, must be sent to me in order to solicit our recommendations for
consideration by the ACOE.
This project should not affect any rare or sensitive fish and "wildlife, though it may improve habitat for
common species that are found in the area. The following are general recommendations that we typically
offer during initial design stages of stream and wetland enhancement projects:
1. Mature riparian vegetation should be preserved as much as possible because it promotes the
stability of channel work and provides seed sources for natural regeneration, organic material to
the streams, and riparian habitat complexity until planted vegetation matures. The use of balled
or container grown trees is recommended along the outsides of channel bends because these
mature plants expedite long -term bank stability more than bare root seedlings and live stakes.
2. Any stream channel modifications should create dimensions, patterns, and profiles that mimic
stable, reference conditions. Overly and unnaturally sinuous stream channels should be avoided.
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries - 1721 Mail Service Center - Raleigh, NC 27699 -1721
Telephone: [phone] - Fax: [phone]

Ross Creek Project Page 2 December 17, 2012
Buncombe
3. Gravel and cobble from abandoned stream channels should be reserved and reused to "seed" new
stream channels where stream channel relocations are undertaken.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. Please contact me at (828) 452 -2546
ext. 24 if you have any questions about these comments.
Sincerely,
Dave McHenry
Mountain Region Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program

EXISTING
PROPERTY
BOUNDARY
LIMITS OF
DISTURBANCE
CUT AND TREAT
(SHADED) INVASIVE TREES,
SEE NOTE 2 (TYP)
PHYSICAL REMOVAL OF
INVASIVE TREES & SHRUBS
SEE NOTE 2 (TYP)
1� \V
0
TP 9
NOTES:
1. ALL CALLOUTS ARE FOR PROPOSED FEATURES UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED.
2. THE MAJORITY OF TREE REMOVAL IS INVASIVE SPECIES REMOVAL. FOR TREE OF
HEAVEN, CUT AND TREAT IS REQUIRED USING HERBICIDE THAT WILL NOT IMPACT
ADJACENT TREES OR AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT. FOR OTHER INVASIVES, PHYSICAL
REMOVAL IS PREFERRED BUT CUT AND TREAT MAY BE ACCEPTABLE -SEEK
APPROVAL FROM ENGINEER.
3. STREAM ENHANCEMENT AREAS TO BE ACCESSED FROM DIRT ROAD. MAINTAIN
ACCESS ALONG DIRT ROAD AT ALL TIMES.
4. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR IMMEDIATE REPAIR OF ANY DAMAGE TO
UTILITIES.
�' •' • MY Or ASM%UL MGM CMMDIA
RIVERLINK, INC.
• - UMHAU PROPERTY
SITE PLAN OVERVIEW
ROSS CREEK WATERSHED
IMPROVEMENT PROJEC
kvq-
"All
mh
mo
1
%yam,.. ` �\ ' �•l _ OEM-�� \l ,� ■1��_`� i • 1 ' •
GRADING LIMITS (TYP)
(S3) STREAM TEMPORARILY
IMPACTED BY NW27
(94 LF, 0.02 ACRES)
STREAM ENHANCEMENT
ALONG EXISTING
ALIGNMENT (SHOWN)
2 +30 TO 3 +30
SHEET 5
`-MODIFIED J -HOOK
OUTLET CONTROL WEIR
HEETS 4A TO 4B
(S1) STREAM (S2) STREAM
PERMANENTLY TEMPORARILY IMPACTED
IMPACTED BY NW18 BY NW27
(31 LF, 0.011 ACRES) (31 LF, 0.009 ACRES)
STREAM ENHANCEMENT HERE TO
CULVERT ASSOCIATED WITH g
STORMWATER INSTALLATION
SHEET 4A
20 Q 20 40
•(S4)STREAM TEMPORARILY IMPACTED BY NW27
(21 LF, 0.003 ACRES)

STORMWATER CONSTRUCT BERM BY
TREATMENT CELL LEAVING EXISTING SOIL
INV= 2067.5 IN PLACE
TOP EL= 2070.0
CONSTRUCTED L
RIFFLE , A R Y
IN V= 2068.5'
/ 18" SILT SOCK
TOP EL= 2068.5
5
FILL SOIL 6 CY
BELOW O.H.W.
ROCK DROP"
WITH LONG ARM — —
INV = 2069.6' j —
*
DREDGE EXISTING MATERIAL
TO PROPOSED CONTOURS
(SEE SHEET 4B)
DENSE PLANTING, SEE PLANTING PLAN (TYP)
- -.
FILL SOIL .- ..
BELOW FINE GRADING 4
CY
n
9�
�+ MW •
r
=� /� . -may .�_ '� ",`'• '•_- ..•.• - -. C
���� : /_;I��;i•, • �!'�_ fir_ ���' =_'`i �� � ���i.�
•.1.11. + • • • � • �� nule:�: / -.� �� -� �,��.�ti�
0
SERVICE
J
MM
AT PIPE OUTLET, CLEAN
OUT PIPE, RELOCATE
DITCH & INSTALL TURF
REINFORCEMENT MATTING,
PLUG EXISTING DITCH
BOULDERS AT TOE,
BOULDER SIZE
3x2x1.5'f
Cm OF AsaNLLL 110M CARMMA
RIVERLINK, INC.
UMHAU PROPERTY
STORMWATER
ROSS CREEK WATERSHED
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
REnsIoNS I sN T NO.
DAIS BM DAIS
kk�w__] m
Michael Baker Engineering, Inc.
797 Haywood Road, Suite 201
Asheville, NC 28806
NC License No.: F -1084
Project #129386
SEE SPOT ELEVATIONS
ALONG J —HOOK WEIR
ARMS SHEET 4B
EXISTING 4x4'
CONC.
BOX CULVERT
—
REMOVE 4 "x4"
LUMBER
FROM OPENING
DOWN
TO ELEVATION
2068.3
NOTES:
1. EXISTING CONTOURS SHOWN. SEE PROPOSED
CONTOURS SHEET 4B.
2. INSTALL STREAM STRUCTURES AT ELEVATIONS
PROVIDED
PERMITTING NOTE:
O.H.W.a2070.0
TOTAL FILL MUST BE <25 CY (NW18
PERMITTING REQUIREMENT)

SURVEY CONTROL POINTS
PT
X
Y
2
TP8
949.52.46
664124.30
2079.01
TP9
949160.30
684078.93
2083:81
Survey by Wes Cole Land Surveying, LLC
Datum Description:
Konzontal Datum is based on NCGS NAD 83
Temporary control points are present on site for
use by the contractor dining construction.
Vertical Datum (88).
INDEX TO DRAWINGS
1.... ...... COVER SHEET
2..-.-...LEGEND AND NOTES
&.— ...SITE PLAN OVERVIEW
4A..»....STORMWATER
4B........STORMWATER GRADING AND SECTIONS
5. ... » .... STREAM PLAN
5...._....EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
7:...... ... PLANTING PLAN
8..........TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS
9-13 ..... DETAILS
RiverLank
ROSS CREEK WATERSHED ENHANCEMENT - UAdHA U PROPERTY
Buncombe County, North Carolina
1'-5W 0 11x17 Type of Work Stormwater Management, Stream Restoration/Enhancement
47EA,FlE1WR•— �'1` -..�— ,i � , }' _ --- _'- _— ! -�•_�� f-! `�.-- •— �'.—_"l / f� � f ai � \" •d ��
Flfr-fQ -'� Vf f A\AFf WSD -
' ff f/ TEMPORARY "`r - ° .- ''�- �'w�''""� - 4�"` ' v -
-� CONSTRUCTION _ ' '�' _!` /, -`�'/� --/' -` _- -.�%'` rn
Contractor shall
obtain survey files
from Engineer for
construction layout
PREPARED FOR THE OFFICE OF:
RIVERLIW
P.O. BOX 15488
ASHEVALLE, NC 28813
)1"RLMKPR0JECTMGR: NANCY HODGES. RLA
Nancv0fterlinkora - 828- 252 -8474 ext 14
PREPARED IN THE OFFICE OF:
L __ HC E" 1a ira:.
p >y' M Haywood ft W, &09 201
p d AshwAs boM CaM&M 28606
Phone [phone]
Fwc 828.3601409
R,
JACOB P. MCLEAN, PE oft &am
PROAMTEA7lrNFEEIIR
JACOB P. MCLEAN, PE
PRQIECTAlM WER
December 31. 2012
DAM
PROJECT ENGINEER
PE.

SYMBOLS Schedule of Quantities I RIVERUNK NCB
JDW
S
+ 2068.3'
EXISTING CENTER LINE (ALIGNMENT
USED FOR REFENCE)
JURISDICTIONAL WETLAND
SEWER LINE
PROPERTY LINE
GRADING LIMIT
INDEX CONTOUR (5')
INTERMEDIATE CONTOUR (1')
PROPOSED CONTOUR (5')
PROPOSED CONTOUR (1')
PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION
CONSTRUCTION
�1.• • PERMANENT
.�
MAINTENANCE ACCESS)
OR EQ. D:•
SMALL TREE OR SHRUB
( <4" DBA)
INVASIVE TREE TO BE PHYSICALLY
REMOVED
SMALL, INVASIVE TREE /SHRUB TO
BE PHYSICALLY REMOVED
CUT AND TREAT INVASIVE TREE SPP.
ROOTWAD (LOG HARVESTED ON —SITE)
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE OR MIX
CLASS' A/B STONE
SEWER- MANHOLE
pq WATER VALVE
UTILITY POLE AND GUY WIRE
f + +
PLANTING UPLAND
PLANTING LOWLAND
STREAM ACCESS
ROUTE
PAVED ROAD
STAGING AREA
SF SILT FENCE
SSX( -SILT SOCK
PUMP AROUND
j
LOD LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE.
py DIVERSION
D
LIMITS OF GRADING
PROPOSED CENTERLINE
PROPOSED TOP OF BANK
PROPOSED FLOW PATH
BERM OR EMBANKMENT WITH
HEAVY PLANTING
O BOULDER 3x2x2 (TYP)
(MAY BE PART OF STRUCTURAL.
ELEMENT, OR STAND ALONE)
UMHAU PROPERTY
LEGEND AND NOTES
ROSS CREEK WATERSHED
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
rxmoNs r rra
M> sad esker En
soneserE� inG
c4 utZHaeooa e to
Nc
28M
NC license No.: F -1084
Project /129388
4x C. f

EXISTING
PROPERTY
BOUNDARY
LIMITS OF CUT AND TREAT
DISTURBANCE1 (SHADED) INVASIVE TREES,
SEE NOTE 2 (TYP)
PHYSICAL REMOVAL OF
INVASIVE TREES & SHRUBS
SEE NOTE 2 (TYP)
� � � `�. _--- `~^ lam.• - _ - r- —' _.__� _ _ _ _ '�- - �' + � 11 i
Lo
RELOCATE DITCH
SHEET 4A
DREDGING AND STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT PRACTICE
CONSTRUCTION SHEET
SHEETS 4A TO 4B
_-- FLOW PATH
NOTES:
1. ALL CALLOUTS ARE FOR PROPOSED FEATURES UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED.
2. THE MAJORITY OF TREE REMOVAL IS INVASIVE SPECIES REMOVAL. FOR TREE OF
HEAVEN, CUT AND TREAT IS REQUIRED USING HERBICIDE THAT WILL NOT IMPACT
ADJACENT TREES OR AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT. FOR OTHER INVASIVES, PHYSICAL
REMOVAL IS PREFERRED BUT CUT AND TREAT MAY BE ACCEPTABLE -SEEK
APPROVAL FROM ENGINEER.
3. STREAM ENHANCEMENT AREAS TO BE ACCESSED FROM DIRT ROAD. MAINTAIN
ACCESS ALONG DIRT ROAD AT ALL. TIMES.
4. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR IMMEDIATE REPAIR OF ANY DAMAGE TO
UTILITIES.
GRADING LIMITS (TYP)
STREAM ENHANCEMENT
ALONG EXISTING
ALIGNMENT (SHOWN)
2 +30 TO 3 +30
SHEET 5
TPS
can ar ASI MO M CAI
RIVERUNK, INC
UMHAU PROPERTY
SITE PLAN OVERVIEW
ROSS CREEK WATERSHED,
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
mmsams
CAM M eR 3
MODIFIED J -HOOK
OUTLET CONTROL WEIR
SHEETS 4A TO 48
STREAM ENHANCEMENT HERE TO
CULVERT ASSOCIATED WITH
STORMWATER INSTALLATION
SHEET 4A
I Mmd Baker Engtneering, Inc.
R ite �l
=-
AsbeVfilR NCNNc
NC Lkense No.: F-1084
Project X129=
ACCESS FOR
CONSTRUCTION
(E &SC)
rf
& PERMANENT
- MAINTENANCE,
SEE
PROPOSED GRADE
DETAIL 2/46
i
1,
r
r
' f EXISTING 4x4'
CONC.
BOX CULVERT
(BOARDED UP
TO
-
WITHIN 6" OF
TOP
,•, OF BOX)
��
�` E &SC CONSTRUCTION
ENTRANCE
MODIFIED J -HOOK
OUTLET CONTROL WEIR
SHEETS 4A TO 48
STREAM ENHANCEMENT HERE TO
CULVERT ASSOCIATED WITH
STORMWATER INSTALLATION
SHEET 4A

STORMWATER
TREATMENT CELL
INV= 2067.5
-- CONSTRUCTED
' RIFFLE
IN V= 2068.5'
CONSTRUCT BERM BY
LEAVING EXISTING SOIL
IN PLACE
TOP EL= 2070.0
V E R
't 18" SILT SOCK
TOP EL= 2068._5
ROCK DROP` —
WITH LONG ARM
_ INV= 2069.6' = r'
c
\/f
i F_ L-.."7
UNDERCUT-
TREE'—
START PROPdSEDJ
CENTERLINE OF STREAM
ENHANCEMENT, CONSTRUCT
PER TYPICAL SECTIONS
F
DREDGE EXISTING MATERIAL
TO PROPOSED CONTOURS
(SEE SHEET 4B)
is rr y
t AD
r 3 j tea..• °'�• .•v ;
s � J
'- ----------
-- .._ -''.
_a
WHERE CL IS SHOWN, MODIFIED J -HOOK OUTLET-
REFER TO SHEET 8 (TYP) CONTROL WEIR INV = 2069.5,
SEE SHEET 48
(INVERT BOULDER(S) ARE 2'
WIDE, TYP BOULDER WIDTH IS' 3')
vi
to 4 10 20
DENSE PLANTING, SEE PLANTING PLAN (TYP)
CLASS A&B EQUAL MIX
STONE OUTLET PROTECTION
_ y
,.o'7 ,
w � V
ENV
2072.5•
Ir
,3
}
l
S
PRIVATE
SERVICE
V
AT PIPE OUTLET, CLEAN
OUT PIPE, RELOCATE
DITCH & INSTALL TURF
REINFORCEMENT MATTING,
PLUG EXISTING DITCH
BOULDERS AT TOE,
BOULDER SIZE
3x2x1.5't
am ar .samm u m COMA"
RIVERUNK. INC.
UMHAU PROPERTY
STORMWATER
ROSS CREEK WATERSHED
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
REMSM SEr Na
CAM on 4A
Michael Salver Erring. Inc.
797 ltayarood Road, SLdto 201
Ash.0.6 Nc 28806
NC Ucense No.: F -1084
Project #129386
e0 61�
••s
. Q
A
s
• 0 •
S
SEE SPOT ELEVATIONS
ALONG J —HOOK WEIR
ARMS SHEET 46
EXISTING 4x4' CONC.
BOX CULVERT —
REMOVE 4 "x4" LUMBER
FROM OPENING DOWN
TO ELEVATION 2068.3
18" SILT SOCK
EQUAL MIX TOP EL= 2069.5
CLASS A&
B RIPRAP 12
CONSTRUCTED -
RIFFLE NOTES:
INV = 2068.5' 1. EXISTING CONTOURS SHOWN. SEE PROPOSED
CONTOURS SHEET 4B.
2. INSTALL STREAM STRUCTURES AT ELEVATIONS
PROVIDED

RENEE —tmp-- I
z
CONTINUE GRADING UP
DITCH PER DETAIL 2/9
111. . \ * r
- --- - - - ` ' ..G _ •_ —_ _ - - — 2075 �. e \
- --- - - - - � w. _- � i� ice.. \ , �1, � P•
_ �a l�
�216g
-� Zp6a,yttt +�`yytt+
SO
J r / j I; F0� 2p6) tu„4�►i 206$ ��10
RFegY 2069 i �o
l 1? p? 0
anot� 2 ,,ytitt . i
„ytt
4 �stau
2068 � +qui
p E
2069 _ L
BOULDERS
EL= 2071.0'
BOULDERS
3x2x2't
(TYP)
EL
2067.0'
L RIPRAP
CLASS A &B
MIX IN SOIL AGAINST
BOULDERS ON STORMWATER
CM er AVEW E. NXM CAMU
RIVERUNK. INC-
UMHAU PROPERTY
STORMWATER GRADING
AND SECTIONS
ROSS CREEK WATERSHED
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
REWWW 11 91EEr N
e"ts Iml er. I owve I 4B
jr; If RE
Mich edw En ln% Inc.
=HeySoft ood Road So 281
Ashevdie. UC 28808
NC Ucense Nm : F -1084
Project x12WI%
P �
P tJ to
DID
SS
i� i� -' . -' I, •' ./ 552.5. 20'
TOP OF J —HOOK ARM BERM TOP EL 2070.0'
EL= 2070.5' BERM SIDE SLOPES 1:1 (TYP)
(SLOPING. SEE SPOT
ELEVATIONS ABOVE) DENSE PLANTING,
SEE PLANTING PLAN
COMPACTED SOIL EXISTING GROUND
(1.1 SLOPE) & j
DENSE PLANTING
PROPOSED 7
- 9 MIN GROUND �©
-_= OR MAINTENANCE 9' MIN
�_ =_ APPLY
ACCESS) (FOR MAINTENANCE STRAW
ACCESS) •
— MATTING
INSTALL TOE PROTECTION AS (TYP)
DIRECTED BY ENGINEER
FILTER
FABRIC LIMITS OF DREDGING (APPROX)
STORMWATER PRACTICE 1
. SECTION VIEW (NTS) Q
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED
MAINTENANCE AND �`-
ACCESS ROAD,
CONSTRUCT PER' 1.5'f
DETAIL 3/12
i x - FF0
r FOR
PRIVATE
SERVICE
(SHALLOW)
2't
PAVED
EXISTING
SANITARY
SEWER PIPE —
8" CLAY
NOTE: PULL LINE BETWEEN
MANHOLES AND TIE IN TO
EXISTING GROUND AT OR BEFORE
POINT WHERE LINE CROSSES
CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE
ACCESS ROAD PROFILE (NTS) '9

■ __-
ROCK DROP (TYP)
BOULDER SIZE 2x2x1"
(TYP) SEE PROFILE 3+5
FOR INVERTS D_
CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
(TYP) SEE PROFILE 00
FOR INVERTS Ie
2+
OD__
*W
ec
2+0
0
EXISTING STREAM
CENTERLINE ALIGNMENT
PROVIDES REFERENCE
STATIONING
21 Of,-,i
209
luml •,
CD
O
0
207
2+30 START
STREAM,
ENHANCEMENT
V\
2+ 3
7
PROFILE
2060-- ADJUSTMENTS
SHOWING
STRUCTURE
— STATIONS AND
INVERTS
200°+00 -, 1 +100
/2+6t,
2075.4
2+71
-79J
3.7
2+88
!0734
2078
0
W
m
z
0
9
r
>
am w Asm%sm mM twAUM
:I:-- RIVERUNK. INC.
05 UMHAU PROPERTY
STREAM PLAN
•
ROSS CREEK WATERSHED
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
F
-7 Michael 8dw Engineering Mr.
'I " - — ,- 797 Maywood Rood. Sidto 201
AWwAl% PIC 28W6
He Lieu= Ift : r-10"
10,± BENCHING ®10:1
r Pm*t #1293M
10• BOX
CULVERT (5X4')
3 +Oa
2072.0
EXISTING GROUND
ALONG ALIGNMENT
2072.6
24:00 34:00 4+00
ZPIUL SLOPE (TYP) rl
S,
ftmj- to 4 e 20
6V FINAL GRADING TO PROPOSED CONTOURS
(SHOWN) OCCURS AFTER STREAM WORK IS
` COMPLETE AND ACCESS IS- STABILIZED
-3+30 END STREAM ENHANCEMENT,
SEE SHEETS 4A & 4B FOR
STREAMWORK ASSOCIATED WITH
DOWNSTREAM STORMWATER PRACTICE
5+ 1 00 6+ 1 00 7+ 1 00 8+ 1 00
=--I 5
I II
0
z.
• 78 f
•% ,
;4 lit
NOTES!
1. ENGINEER TO LAYOUT HORIZONTAL LOCATION OF
STREAM STRUCTURES AND CHANNEL BETWEEN
STATIONS 2+30 TO 3+30; CONTRACTOR
RESPONSIBLE FOR VERTICAL POSITIONS
LEGEND
PROPOSED
STRUCTURE
(HEADER AND
FOOTER SHOWN)
9-f:00 STATION (FT)

a _
STRAW EROSION��
_ -
r��`- =_ = -• ---• PUMP — CONTROL MATTING: -
s'� AROUND BIODEGRADABLE • _J�
(TYP) (TYP) f-
f
ACCESS ROUTE,
ALONG FLOODPLAIN - -- - ` ,�" r ' ►ice
-- ----'+ `` BENCHING . - 2�0 1-1
ell-
WAVER
4 �
''... -- ' °`' i+�� "_""—�- • --' ` � �- -" .,- Grt1t a' +m+uLr Ia7Id CaNdltl
RIVERUNK. INC.
UMHAU PROPERT1f
--� �'•-��- -. , > ,.�'`_ _ = Jr' EROSION AND SEDIMEiVT
CONTROL PLAN
o _
ROSS CREEK WATERSHED
- //�� ``~•. r� IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
SHEET NOL
ate lud we wte 6
a r //j
`I 1 '1 �• � J v '
1 t Rio
>
f-50�i 5 1ctad Bake Engftee rtn% Inc
e28 Oto 20!
.0O� Me r B
' ---
r roc tkense aa.: F -10e4
,�_ _1 , r r Project X129388
Boa — ;= _ _ i .� -- _�--•- _� � --�_��
STAGING STAGING
AS t � ,� — - �� ---�.� AREA % f- �� = — TEMPORARY -�
t ` _- --- ' J`r (TYP) — - -'� 1� ---- -- DIVERSION = �-
. NEEDED GRADING
'X�? 12 SILT — -
LIMITS - -- - r - -_. —_l - -----
SOCK (TYP) — - y _ f T f ' -- _
(TYP) 2` -`
= ---= -- LIMITS OF
DISTRUBANCE(TYP)
----------- 1„ _.��• -.- -'.ter . ",, -�-�i` ! - �'^\�' �' ``. + ` �•. \
NOTES:
1. IN EACH AREA AND PHASE, CONTRACTOR SHALL
INSTALL E &SC MEASURES PRIOR TO STARTING WORK
2. ALL WORK MUST BE CONDUCTED IN DRY USING
PUMPING AND DIVERSIONS AS NECESSARY TO ROUTE
BASEFLOWf AND SEEPAGE AROUND WORK AREA. IT
IS ANTICIPATED THAT A DIVERSION WILL BE
NECESSARY SO THAT CONTINUOUS PUMPING IS NOT
REQUIRED.
3. DEWATERING OPERATIONS MUST DISCHARGE TO
SPECIAL STILLING BASIN
zo 2�O

O
- LIVESTAKE
BOTH BANKS_ ---
2 +30 TO 3 +30 --
ARFA F `
" (TYP)
_ - INTERPLANTED=
SEED WITH LOBELIA (15). y -
JUNCUS
-- CARER (30), AND
EFFUSUS - _ OSMUNDA (15) _ • -= �"
300 SQ FT
+ 1-p� NPVS lS5
+
+
m
MYRICA
CERASIFERA (6)
aet��u +ses0 -= � � %" . •• `� •a ury +�it���y`�ssti
•'+ •• -r /• �/t�ytfitlil9tliS
IC
11 t�s�am
• 9r,ryrtrltrrhlt��.
CARI]INAUS (15)
f- R
DETAILED PLANTING PLAN
AREA A
v �
r `
AI
amOF Asaymm �002ju
RIVERUNK. INC.
UMHAU PROPERTY
PLANTING PLAN
ROSS CREEK WATERSHED
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
as isam
Ukhael ticker Engineering Inc.
797 Haywood Rood. We 201
Ashw% tai NC 2=6
HC Ucense Ho.: F -1084
Project W129388
20 4 2�0 v
[] j—.9110111111
q al
~• �'�
AREA A
AREA D
_��� *,
CORNUS FLORIDA (1)
LEUCOTHOE FONTANESIANA (10)
LEUCOTHOE FONTANESIANA (9)
CORNUS AMMOMUM (6)
CORNUS AMOMUM (7)
ILEX GLABRA (8)
ILEX GLABRA (8)
HYDRANGEA QUERCIFOLIA (3)
\
CERCIS CANADENSIS (1)
AREA E
AREA B
VACCINIUM CORYMBOSUM (3)
VACCINIUM CORYMBOSUM (7)
RHODODENDRON MAXIMUM (3)
RHODODENDRON MAXIMUM (4)
RHODODENDRON CALENDELACEUM (3)
RHODODENDRON CALENDELACEUM (3)
BETULA NIGRA (1)
PLATANUS OCCIDENTAUS (1)
AREA C
OXYDENDRUM ARBOREUM (1)
ITEA VIRGINICA (16)
CERCIS CANADENSIS (2)
CLETHRA ALNIFOUA (12)
CORNUS FLORIDA (1)
ILEX GLABRA (12)
"--UPON COMPLETION, MIX IN
` 1" OF TOP SOIL TO STONE
1 ON ACCESS DRIVE AND SEED
WITH TEMPORARY AND
` . PERMANENT SEED
SEED WI TH
JUNCUS
./ EFFUSUS -
-150 SQ FT
5 10
AREA F
LEUCOTHOE FONTANESIANA (9)
ITEA VIRGINICA (3)
CLETHRA ALNIFOLIA (3)
BETULA NIGRA (2)
PLATANUS OCCIDENTALIS (1)
HYDRANGEA QUERCIFOLIA (3)
CERCIS CANADENSIS (1)
CORNUS FLORIDA (1)
ILEX GLABRA (7)
PHYSOCARPUS OPUUFOLIUS (75)
CORNUS AMOMUM (75)
NOTES:
1. ENGINEER WILL ASSIST WITH PLANT LAYOUT.
NOTIFY ENGINEER WHEN PLANTING IS TO BE
CONDUCTED
2. SEED ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITH
TEMPORARY SEED AND PERMANENT RIPARIAN
SEED MIX, SEE PROJECT SPECIFICATION FOR
SEED MIX
3. PLANTING QUANTITIES PROVIDED ABOVE,
SEE BID TAB FOR PLANT SIZES
11

SLOPE TO EXISTING
GROUND
C
SLOPE TO
EXISTING
GROUND
5.
Ifill rL—I%
TYPICAL RIFFLE CROSS SECTION
(NTS)
INVERT
TYPICAL STEP POOL CROSS SECTION
(NTS)
Qn Q AWN NIM CAIO�A
RIVERUNK. INC.
UMHAU PROPERTY
TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS
ROSS CREEK WATERSHED
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
RIGHT FLOODPLAIN �� $ �a
BENCH = 10 f 3
WHERE INDICATED ON
PLANS (TYP)
,+nad Baker FAg. uu.
y
Assnhw e. NC b sat
_ NC Lkwss Na : F -1084
IProject fP
i
10
APPLY COIR FIBER
MATTING, 6 FT ROLL
WIDTH (TYP) RIFFLE
AND POOLS, SEE
DETAIL
RIGHT
BENCH
INHERE
PLANS
10
FLOODPLAIN
= 10' f
INDICATED ON
(TYP)
NOTES:
1. REFER TO GRADING
CONTOURS TO CONSTRUCT
RIGHT FLOODPLAIN
BENCHING (BENCHING
ONLY APPLIES TO 2 +30
TO 3+ 30)
2. APPLY COIR FIBER
(CF700) MATTING TO ALL
DISTURBED STREAM BANKS
PER STANDARD DETAIL
3. TYPICALS APPLY BOTH
IN UPSTREAM AND
DOWNSTREAM STREAM
ENHANCEMENT REACHES
4. CROSS SECTION
CONVENTION IS LOOKING
DOWNSTREAM
�,Y9 ^ul•�cae• �
6.�t3 .g�
sEA i
��43 719: i•

RIVERUNK, INC.
LWAU PROPERTY
MASS
LOSS CREEK WATERSHEI
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
"m
lilri
Mfchaet Bilker FlogilTeering. Inc.
797 Heywood Road, Suits 201
AshevW- NC 78808
NC license Na : F -1084
Project /129386
-., et Ia *'4 -�..,
C14ANNELIZED
FLAW
+�
DIG OUT
SCOUR
.O>rl
HM-E- 18'
^
i2° (T1fPj
NCD07 APPROVED 5`
DEEP
a
PE
Tp>r IIf
REINF13CE ENT MAT, MIN.
7T
RATING O L IICITY
TOE OF SLOPE
18' CLASS,
EQUAL 12FT /S
UNDISTURBED RIPRAP
TURF REINF. MATTING MUST BE
SOIL SECTION L3 -9
TIGHT AND FLUSH TO GROUND
-TIGHT
STAPLES OR FASTENERS,
TYPE AND SPACING PER
MANUF. RECOMMENDATIONS
BUILD STONE UP
HIGHER AROUND EDGES PLAN
VIEW
NEAR BANKS TO
itl IS OK OUTSIDE !IF
PREVENT FLOW
APPLY ANY SPECIFIED 5' MINIMUM FLAT
AGAINST SOIL (TYP>
A
SLOPE TREATMENT AS OUTLET WEIR
APPLICABLE
APPLY TEMPORARY AND
SFECIFlEO �fYLANS
3 FT BOTTOM
PERMANENT SEED TO ALL WIDTH
DISTURBED AREAS PRIER
APPL ICATION OF
SEED AND STRAW ALL �R
MATT NG
DISTURBED AREAS
CONTINUE ANY UPGRADIENT 18" (TYP)
TREATMENT TO TOE (AS
APPLICABLE>
SECTION A -A
UNDISTURBED
SOIL
i STONE
OUTLET PROTECTION
2 TURF REINFORCEMENT MATTING
9 NUT TO SCALE
k,9 NOT TO SCALE
ooeR n3m H4nm
IM GEDUFL Etmft
C I�
Pl TOP of
FiD00 /le/
,
'
i S
WEIR HEADER BOULDER
WWTHS VARY
SHALL 8E 2' 9UE1173 .
3 :
1-r-:
BA.CKFILL
WIDE TO ACHIEVE SPOT
s:s `..':: {;5,:;;.�;:• ,r• r_;�r .::ref__; c_�K; cc >;cj.�'s..t
SEE SECTION
ELEVATIONS AS SHOWN IN
PLAN NEW ON SHEET 4B
i.;•i •:.w
?� c7:;ac? ce i \.._4\J �. V; \i. pV i Gt: ti�i tr C•a 'F R \} Vl:s
148
-i
...,_:rai�•...._. :.iC`.'Cic':'-_:i�.= ya___t.._..- ...- .:-• ---.. _._• =s'•:`+.._Y. -:
�
va SINGLE OR
MML7WLE AS
BOULDER HEADERS
TIE IN TO
DEMED ON
3Nx/5wZ NOMINAL
Q
GROUND
SEE FRaim SPcom
� CROSS SECTION VIEW PLAN VIEW
PLANS
DIMENSIONS
A
TRElRCFCYRG RrTHOO
NCOOT TYPE
2 FILTER
FABRIC N
BOTH SIDES
OF 6l DRS
POOL
BOULDER
I OOR
T Efl
am-
mm Pow 1Emm ow kmTmok
SMAPELR QE 00 OF7W LDO WITH A OIMUSMt BEFORE 'DW^ ' `1
jr WM TIE eviK OFSW NOOT NGOS UPSMMM SD 7W ME ANCHOR UCOC R OF L \
SIilO1y f1CM11 11EEi5 T7lE RO07 IUD AT A 9O- DE6REE MIGM OEFtD6 M OVER CENTER OF LOS
#40 CwAPS
OR
TTE tAIER A7U.Y FTIDY 7HE BA1o1 011 RE a+cRFASED EF NOT
Gokp
DOULCM
TR0 C W* MEMO&. CEri7EFED RThA LOG
HEADER ROCK (8' DEPTH)
13AC101LL MIX STRFJUILtiED ElE1i
CLASS A,/B AND
ON -SITE ALLIRAUM LIMP CELT. aw
R THE ROOT Low CAMIOT BE MEN PRO THE &Va OR THE BMA NEEIIS
To BE RECoNSTR =M THE T AfEINW SHana SE USA TM
PERM REALM IfAT A TRUICH eE ExGkWOM FOR 7HE LOG
FORD= OF TIE ROOT 1MA IN THIS CAST. A FOOTER LOO W40UID BE
UESwum LOlorind N THE ROOT I= w A TFOICH EKCi VAM PA%UAEI t-somm 064EFFER
FILTER FABR�
BOTH SIDES
SITWaffiED, *W-TMW OF THE
RtOOT D R�EX&A eELW BELON HOSUAL SAM FLOW CONIMMM& :mC
SPESS FOR EImmm SIZE
AT A M
AR VAREES:
REFER TD P Y
3. CHIN GAPS WITH CLASS A
AND OR RLL WITH MORTAR
SHO p BE
im
MIN.
�--
N
4' FOOTER ROCK (2' DEPTH)
THE rim WD O' A
MtN.
BADR F�OY 6 FOtelEA
• MXZPFAME To 96M EOUIVAIMF PLAN VIEW
M
THE F=T
BBoottllimn PPL4 w
PLAN YiEW
SECTION A - A
MINEIAUM ROOTWAD LOG, LEKta'TH a R WSME1R OF SMALLER g�m}ows (NIN ORK POINT MEIHOD
DIAMETER' FT DOOTaIIL1 EaUAlS IF APML- BY
AM TROWtAMS
MINIMUM ROOTEIAI.L —Z UST
FNGIIRQI. 501E Y BE 11E1L
MINIMUM LAG DIAMETER 6 IN (DBH) OOMCM.
AND PAVM FOR
THOSE PAY 8W
3
MODIFIED ROCK J -HOOK OUTLET CONTROL WEIR
4 ROOT WAD
9
NOT TD SCALE
9 N11T TO SCALE
RIVERUNK, INC.
LWAU PROPERTY
MASS
LOSS CREEK WATERSHEI
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
"m
lilri
Mfchaet Bilker FlogilTeering. Inc.
797 Heywood Road, Suits 201
AshevW- NC 78808
NC license Na : F -1084
Project /129386
-., et Ia *'4 -�..,

CONSTRUCT
A
TYPICAL ,,--HEADER
BOULDERS TOP
O
r
POOL I t of
TOP 1 �K
1 1 r-RIFFLE MATERIAL
8 � " �� B. HEAD OF COMPOSITION IN PROJECT
OF BARK (7YP)
i-
PLUNGE
1 RISE ( SPECIFIC TABLE
L ; o
ON -SLTE
7De
A t1F SLOPE A, ALLU'AUM
RlF� TAIL OF
B o
L.E14GTH OF WfFLE7�
RIFFLE, o p (INiIERI)
F-
"
j FOOTER
"SPLASH'
o SEE PLAN
�p G+4
z g p ° (JEPTH
BOULDERS
m
ALTEREALI E PLAN VIEW: TWO BOULDERS FORM
0 O °
if h�T
'I
o o PROFILE A=A!
EMBEDDED IN BANK
INVERT KEY
/ �''� VIEV PLACED ON TOP Qf LEGEND
�ExOUAL
fLfl/ FROM
COIR FIBER BANK
Mil(
A' DESIGN PROFILE OR
ON -BRIE GRAVEL MATTING, OR SECURE � APPROXIMATE LEVEL OF BASEFLOW
PtJLN VIEW PLANYeEW CALLOUT TYP TOP OF BANK
AND COBBLE: AND MATTING TO CONFORM WATER SURFACE
CLASS i STONE TEP HEIGHT FROM TO EDGE OF STONE WITH CHANNEL 1HALWEG
MULTIPLE LARGE WOOD / CONTROL LINE
TOP OF BAN P) PROFILE
STAKES CHANNEL BED MATERIAL
OCR FIBER
MATTING
A A'
FILTER FABRIC (TYPE
2 NON WOVEN)
D Ox'
T71
ROSS CREEK PROJECT SPECIFIC SPECS
THALIYEC/INVERT BOULDER: 2�xT•5'xl' (MIN)
/LTER
10X OF BATIK HT 109E OF BANK HT
RIFFLE OON.POSTKW (WELL GRADED)
FA t.5' -2' PLUNGE
RIFFLE DEPTH 'A _IN - 5 X CLASS A SECTION B -B'
X CLASS B
SECTI[EL A -A P00C ( ) "AL•L FEATURES SHOWN ARE PROPOSED
—79:: (WASHED)
10 X EXISTTIINOG STONE TEOGRAVELS & SAND (BYO SILT)
i ROCK DROP
3 CONSTRUCTED RIFFLE
10 NOT TO SCALE
M-01/ NOT TO SCALE
• WHERE DC=TM ON SITE PLAN BY NATCHUM Alm D! OTHER DETAXCS t(1iEO1tFT Ac T� ♦WO]).
s1rACIxG swarm z. THE s+�anm DENSITY Gd L ATFD IWiil THIS OEFAIL 45 SEE NotE 10
� � �7. 6a
ALCEYTA9LE 1. STAKES SHOULD BE CUT AND OSTASLED ON THE SANE DAY.
2 ,1x1 NOT DISTATL STAKES 1HAT HAVE BODE WLFT.
13YD OF MATTING AT TOP OF BANK IN
6" TRENCH CO 'A flBl7i WITTING SHALL BE CF7O0 OR DR11Al ROLLED OUT PARALLEL BE
ROLL ED MUST R
TOP OF WITH STREAM FllfN
.1 STAKES MUST BE INSTALLED WITH BIAS P W WG L?WAFOS
e. STAKES SHOULD BE INSTALLED PEWENZ ULM TO SAM
BANK TOE OF STREAUBAKK IN
I STOKES SHOULD BE r TO 2 EVOKES 1M M1E1ER ACm t8" iD J�7' L6NG.
8, STAKES SHOULD BE RUED LFAVLVG t OF STAKE ABOV£ OROUAmt
TOFFEES (EDGE OF WATER N r `
7QP 541iFAfm 2-X (VARIES} 7 SEE VEtETA7T4N T FOR SPEM
OUTSIDE SEND OF POOLS) �
F�:ST STAKE AT y NOSFST, � �sNT �
LEAST S' tROiM EOGE
STAKE � *
{TYP) ;
or ID IfERTIGIt SPACND MSCALLY E-3; YAIEES'. StOIAD BE APPROfm1ATELY BANK
m " SLOPE LENGTH OWED BY / OF ROWS FROM PROJECT SPEWX TABLE
+ +
- -
t t
BASEFL t
TOE OF SAMIEDGE OF WATER
I #
+
- SWAM CUT
IN -SITU SOIL �`
r ` ` `
OF dtANNEL 8it05 FADIXG IPif
-.• a-
` t
LIVE T('N
.r••., 1121 1 MA.
-- -E .. IB' — Xr LENGTN
CT11,1
CROSS - SECTION VIEW OF UVE STAKING SPECIFI ATION
SECTION VIEW INSTALL LARGE WOODEN
TOE STAKE EVERY 2 FT. / f M
TRENCH IN MATTING' ,, �>
_
"�t7p(�
AzrfaE Cur - 45 DECREES
t
'
1. KS SHALL BE SEEDED (TEMPORARY AND
k'
OF
PERINNENT) AND MULCHED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION
LIVE STAKE DETAIL
OF MATTING,
_ :•; : • ; :,; _: •;._ . ,_.• .. :. ;. ,: -•.:-
2. MATTING SHALL BE PLACED ACCORDING TO
MANUFAMRER S SPECIFICAMMYS. PROPER OVERLAP
2 -J [YARIESj :7'.-- ..�...: ' i;.: -•.i;' _f,.: i:.::.4;.- :.i.
3. MATTING SHALL BE STAKED IN O',i+6fOND
' 4 .' ' ' ...':..:.: '::: _�:: •.: j,::: f' ='= Pu�xT sTAxES FRCa
PATTERN.
': : • i': :: i'• . •: t1 _- .. -_ f• , �::: -_r TOP OF SAW TO TOE OF BANK
•_
4. AT TOP OF BANK. MATTING SHALL BE PLACED 1't
,<<•• -`: /'; °,: t _• •. �... . *• �.• ` : �.• �•. • II!; SEE PIID.EICT iPpC51C >7 OF IIaMS
fit'; :. : �:.` t•:. • t: •
LN la" DEEP TRENCH. STAKED. tiACKFTI[Ep, AND
_ , . ;.r• :: .. _ - . .i'
=.,�..
COMPACTED. LARGE WOODEN STAKE:
"x24"
TOE w BASK :.��.�;:.� .._.:.1..;.:.i -': _:, .:. _i:.,: ::,_:.�.
3. MATTING MUST ROLLED OUT PARALLEL WITH SMALL WOODEN STAKE: 12 W. 1. 5'x1.5 WITH 2.5"
~ -
ST AKA FLOW. STAKF, APPROX DIMENSIONS 1/2" GALVANIZED NAIL EXTRUDING 0.5'
K1iTEN BRANCH PROJECT SPEGIffG SPECS
S. ND MATTING ON POINT BARS (BETWEEN POINT x 1" WITH NOTCH CUT 1" FROM ON EITHER SME TO HELP HOLD
PLAN VIEW OF UVE STAKING SPECIFICATION MAINSTEM TRIBUTARIES
OF CURVATURE -PC. AND POINT OF TANGENCY -PT) TOP AS SHOWN DOWN UAT LNG
II! Rows 3 2 FT
1/2 "t TYPICAL STAKES
2 1NE STAKING
4 COIR FIBER- MATTING STREAMBANK APPUCATION
\LOJ NOT M SCALE
10. NOT TO SCALE
RIVERUNK. INC.
UMHAU PROPERTY
DETAILS
ROSS CREEK WATERSHED
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
REVISMS SHEEF NR
BT: DRTE � O
I 11
MicUad Baker Eng7nexv0ng hte.
787 Hoym=d Road, Suite 201
AsllgvfAe, NC 28E06
NC license NO.: F -1084
Project P29386
Vz,
a
s
• e
i 7� a�� X674
♦

EXCAVATE THE ENTIRE ROOT
MASS AND AS MUCH ADDITIONAL
SOIL AS POSSIBLE
WATER RETENTION BERM%
TRANSPLANT NOTE:
EXCAVATE TRANSPLANTS USING A
FRONT END LOADER OR TRACKHOE.
DEPENDING ON ROOT DEPTH
EXCAVATE A HOLE THAT \ GRADE
WILL ACCOMMODATE THE y`
SIZE OF TRANSPLANT
COMPACT BACKFILL
SINGLE TRANSPLANT COMPACT BAC
DO NOT REMOVE
TREE OR SHRUB SHALL
BE INSTALLED SO THAT 1/8
OF THE ROOT BALL WILL
BE ABOVE FINISHED GRADE
WATER RETENTION
FINISHED GRADE`
SPAANT CLUSTE
GRADE WATER
RETENTION BERM
WITH SOIL
FINISHED GRADE \
(4. TYP)
--COMPACT BACKFILL---r
CONTAINERIZED PLANTING
GROUND LEVEL
TRANSPLANT THE ENTIRE ROOT
MASS AND AS MUCH ADDITIONAL
SOIL AS POSSIBLE
EXCAVATE A HOLE THAT
WILL ACCOMMODATE THE
SIZE OF TRANSPLANT A L
FINISHED
SCARIFY TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF
5 ". OR 2" DEEPER THAN ROOT MASS
GROUND COVER TRANSPLANT
rTREE OR SHRUB SHALL BE
INSTALLED SO THAT 1/8 OF
THE ROOT BALL WILL BE
ABOVE FINISHED GRADE
MULCH (4° TYP)
CONTAINERIZED PLANTING
SLOPING GROUND
CONTAINERIZED PLATING NOTES:
1. WHEN PREPARING THE HOLE FOR A CONTAINERIZED PLANT. EXCAVATE THE }TOLE 8 —12 INCHES tARGER THAN
THE DIAMETER OF THE POT AND THE SAME DEPTH AS THE POT.
2. REMOVE THE PLANT FROM THE POT._ LAY THE PLANT ON ITS SIDE IF NECESSARY TO REMOVE THE POT.
3. IF THE PLANT IS ROOTBOUND (ROOTS GROWING IN A SPIRAL AROUND THE ROOT BALL). MAKE VERTICAL CUTS
WITH A KNIFE OR SPADE JUST DEEP ENOUGH TO CUT THE NET OF ROOTS. ALSO MAKE A CROSS —CROSS CUT
ACROSS THE BOTTOM OF THE BALL-
4. PLACE THE PLANT IN THE HOLE.
5. FILL HALF OF THE HOLE WITH SOIL (SAME SOIL REMOVED FOR BACKFILL).
6. WATER THE SOIL TO REMOVE AIR POCKETS AND FILL THE REST OF THE HOLE WITH THE REMAINING SOIL
X (TYP)
CREATE HOLE USING A
MATTOCK. DIBBLE. PLANTING HOLE SHOULD BE LARGE ENOUGH TO
BAR. OR OTHER APPROVED ALLOW THE ROOTS TO SPREAD OUT
MEANS. AND CLOSE HOLE WITH AND DOWN WITHOUT J— ROOTING
BACKFILL OR BY PRESSING
CLOSED FROM AN ADJACENT
PARALLEL HOLE.
BARE ROOT TREE PLANTING
HEADING CUT
THINNING CUT
PRUNING CUTS
Permanent Seeding Species t w Sheanbank wW Natural AreasL
COW&M-RWE
SCEVV CHME
R MCEWAGE
Rococo
A- WrAlraa
10 is
VtrortawW'
&. jstiir '
15 2.25
sritcrtgrm
Fmoum yr nan
15 225
Ea_!a» ganno Fm
TWO— des
5 075
PomwWarla vngtweea
ftVC=un TMcL9n
5 0.7s
We bkie stew
£ct3rech ' aeim
5 075
Sot lush
a¢=s emses
5 075
eegp. suck
So= Uon6osa Car affttosaJ
30 1s
Lenoo*mdtkksead
Corcco;ranoeclata
10 15
Tiogad5erton
Paroo"d`a+dest6nrn
10 1s
ft L1 J& em
Ardro=gcn gerenfo
5 075
tr fan grass
sm2adrum miens
5 075
2
TtfaY
190 15
TEMPORARY SEEDING AND MULCHING NOTES:
1'. APPLIES TO ALL DISTURBED AREAS EXCEPT
CHANNEL AND STORMWATER PRACTICE BOTTOMS
2. APPLY RYE GRAIN AT 3 LBS /1000 SQ FT
SEPT —MAR, APPLY BROWNTOP MILLET 1 LB /1000 SO
FT APR —AUG
'ROSS CREEK PLANT UST
TREES
fl
Michael 8dw Engitc=erb Inc.
797 HaywwI Road, 201
201
Asheville. KC 28806
NC License Na : F -1084
Project b129366
RIVERUNK, INC.
UMHAU PROPERTY
DETAILS
ROSS CREEK WATERSHED
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
REw4ws 4{ES NO
a.�q7 ♦ / �j
• a"
�`�`�. ••^► "'•- �� � '•! �.' tea,
QTY
GENL3
SPECIES
VARIETY
COMMON NAME
SIZE
REMARKS
3
Bettda
riagre
13 ft. o.c. min, 1.5' min. stake
12'min.
Riyerbirch
6' ht
20 ft, o.c. min.
uniform bn=hing, 0 specimen
3
Comas
006da
Flowering dogwood
6' ht
20 ft. o c. min.
uniform branching. AN specimen
4
Cercis
canadensis
Redbud
6' ht
20 ft. o.c, min.
uniform branching. Ul specimen
1
Oxydenftm
arboreum
'Henry's Gamey
Sourwood
6' ht
20 IL o.c, min.
uniform branching. full specimen
2
Platenus
occidefdalis
Sycamore
6' M
20 ft. o.c. min.
uniform branching. AAI specimen
L.IV ESTAK ES
QTY
IGENUS
ISPIECIES
IVARIETY
ICOMMONNAME SIZE BARKS
75
lPhysocarpus
lopulilMius
Qethra
INinebafk Lhestake
Ithestake
13 ft. o.c. min, 1.5' min. stake
12'min.
75
Camas
jamoTnum
unifioom branching, fill specimen
ISilky Dogwood
3 ft. o.c. min, stake
sHRuss
QTY
GENUS
SPECIES
VARIETY
COMMON NAME
SIZE
REMARKS
15
Qethra
abnillAS
'Hummingbird
Hummingbird Sweet Peppertwsh
3 gal.
4 ft. o.c. min.
unifioom branching, fill specimen
13
Comus
amomum
Silky Dogwood
3 gal.
3 ft_ o.c- min.
urffimn branching, IUII specimen
35
Ilex
0abra
inkbeny Hogy
3 gel.
3 ft. c.c. min.
uniform branching, full specimen
3
flea
arginica
'Henry's Gamey
Virginia Svmetspwo
3 gal.
3 ft, o.c. min.
uniform branching, full specimen
28
Leucothoe
fontaneslana
Mtn Laxothoe
3 gal.
4 IL o.c. min.
uNkorn branching, fill specimen
6
Mydca
MOM
Soulhem waxmyrtle
5981,
5 ft. o.c. min.
urftrm branching, full specimen
7
Rhododendron
maximum
Roseboy Rhododendron
3 gal_
5 fir o c. min.
Lrrtif8rm branctng, full specimen
6
Rhododend n
calendulaceum
Flame azalea
3 gel.
12 R. o.c. min.
urifoml branctdng, full specimen
10
Vaccinium
corymbosum
lHighbush Bluebeny
39W-
5 It. o.c. min.
wukrrn branching, full specimen
6-
Hydrangea
guerdiblia
10okleaf hydrangea
3 gal.
12 ft. o.c. min.
juniflum branching. fLAI specimen
PERENNIALS
LL
GENERAL NDTES•
1. KEEP ROOTS MOIST WHILE DISTRIBUTING OR WAITING TO PLANT BY MEANS OF WET CANVAS. BURLAP, OR STRAW. 65 Os
2. HEEL —IN PLANTS IN MOIST SOIL OR SAWDUST IF NOT PROMPTLY PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL TO PROJECT SITE
3. PRUNE ANY BROKEN LIMBS. GRASSES
4. EVERY EFFORT SHOULD BE MADE TO KEEP SOIL EXCAVATED FOR PLANTING FROM ENTERING STREAM..
ACCIDENTAL FILL SHOULD BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. "rL_J =`
2 TREE & SHRUB PLANTING
11 NOT TO SCALE
Iris
lrn. o.c.
in. c.c.
in. o.c.
o.c.
o.c.
O.C.

APPLY TEMPORARY AND —
PERMANENT SEED AND
STRAW TO DISTURBED.
AREAS PRIOR TO
APPLICATION OF MATTING
STRAW MATTING
COMPLIANT WITH NCDOT
SPECIFICATIONS
SECTION 1060
THREADING MUST BE-
DEGRADABLE
EROSION CONTROL MATTING
NOT -TO SCALE
MATTING BUST BE TIGHT AND
FLUSH TO GROUND
USE WOODEN ECOSTAKE OR
EQUIVALENT IM LIEU OF METAL
STAPLES'
APPLY AT RECOMMENDED SPACING
APPUCA
T —PASTS SHALL BE 1.33 LB/lF STEEL WITH A MINIMUM LENGTH OF 5 FEET NO
SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED SO AS TO ALLOW FOR FASTENING OF THE FABRIC
WIRE OR PLASTIC ZIP TIES WITH
A MINIMUM TENSILE STRENGTH
OF 50 LB SHALL BE USED TO
CONSTRUCT THE FENCE —
MESH CONSISTING OF
14 GAGE WIRE AT MAX
SPACING OF 6"x6"
CHANICALLY COMPACTED FILL
PASSES OF A COMPACTION DEVICE
ERTING AT LEAST-60 LB /SQ IN ON
TH SIDES- OF FENCE
0 SILT FENCE
12 NOT TO SCALE
ILTE2 FABRIC SHALL BE
STANDARD OR EXTRA STRENGTH
SYNTHETIC FIBER CERTIFIED BY
THE MANUFACTURER TO
COMPLY WITH MATERIAL
REQUIREMENTS IN ASTM
STANDARDS D 6461, 4632.
4491. 4751, AND 4355.
<Y
1) AVOID JOINTS. UNAVOIDABLE JOINTS
MUST HAVE 4 FEET OF CLOTH OVERLAP
AND SHOULD TIE. INTO THE NEXT
ADJACENT POST
2) PLACE ON CONTOUR EXCEPT ENDS
WHICH SHOULD BE 1' ABOVE GRADE TO
PREVENT CUT AROUND
3) WRAP APPROX. 6" OF FABRIC
AROUND END POSTS AND SECURE WITH
TIES.
4) REMOVE ONCE AREA IS STABLE
6" MIN.
(CLASS A)
2 " -3' COARSE AGGREGATE
GEOTEXIILE
N9.Il�
1) UPON COMPLETION. SOIL ROM ENTRANCE WILL BE
RETURNED TO PRE — EXISTING CONDITION. MAINTENANCE ACCESS
WILL BE AMENDED WITH t —Y SOIL AND GRASS SEED.
2) MAINTAIN SO AS TO PREVENT TRACKING OF MUD ONTO
STREETS. PERIODICALLY TOP DRESS WITH STONE AS NECESSARY.
IM3M) EDIATELY MUD ONTO PAVED ROADS SHALL BE REMOVED
4) STONE SHALL BE REPLACED IF IT IS FILLED WITH MUD
5) PROVIDE, TURNING RADIUS LARGE ENOUGH FOR ANTICIPATED
VEHICLE TRAFFIC.
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE
V NOT TO SCALE
EROSION CONTROL APPLICATION BANK FORMATION OR DA ERSION
(IN LIEU OF SILT FENCE) 2" X 2" X 36" APPLICATION (NOTE: 113" SOCK REQ.)
COMPACTEOSOIL WOODEN STAKES (2) 2" X 2" X
PLACEDTO PREVENT PLACED 10' O.C. UPGRADIENT 36" WOODEN
-LOW UNDER SILT SOCK Flu' (TYP) STAKES, PLACED
UPSLOPE DOWNSLOPE AREA TO 10' O.C.
BE PROTECTED UPSLOPE (OFFSET)
18" MIN 2" FILTREXX -SILT STREAM OR
SOXX OR (VERSION CHANNEJ
EQUIVALENT 18" MIN i8" FILTREXX SILT
SOXX OR.
SECTIOR EQUIVALENT
27 X 2' X 36" WOODEN
AKES PLACED 10' O.C,
1. ALL MATERIAL TO MEET FILTREXX@L SPECIFICATIONS.
2. SILT SOXX91 FILL TO MEET APPUCA11ON REQUIREMENTS OR DOWNSLOPE
.4,
BEAPPROYED BY ENGINEER. •z �•,•..
3. FOR EROSION CONTROL SLOPE APPUCATION PLACE ON 4-• 2" X 2' X 36" WOODEN
CONTOUR EXCEPT ENDS WHICH SHALL BE AT LEAST B° HIGHER = STAKES PLACED 1Q' O.C.
4. TO BE INSTALLED BY CERTIFIED INSTALL# ? - (BANK FORMATION OR
5. NO SILT SOCKS HAVE BEEN SPECIFIED ON THE PLAN UPSLOPE �. ONERSKXN APPLICATION)
SHEETS. OUT THE CONTRACTOR MAY ELECT TO USE SILT
SOCKS WHERE SILT FENCE IS DEEMED NECESSARY DURING THE <•`;c{ FiLTREXX ®SILT
COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION S0XK'w (MIW
6. MIX PERMANENT SEED MIX INTO SOCKS. ` DEPENDING ON APPL)
7. UNLIKE SILT FENCE. SILT SOCK DOES NOT NEED TO BE >:r.•
REMOVED AND CAN BE LEFT' IN PLACE PERMANENTLY.
M NTS
4 SILT SOCK
12 NOT TO SCALE
RIVERUNK. INC.
VMHAU PROPERW
DETAILS
ROSS CREEK WATERSHEI
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
1.2
,I
l�
Mk MW Baker Engtneedn96- (na.
797 Haywood Rood, Stilts 20T
Ashedk6 NC 28808
ABC Lka se Na : F -1084
Pre)eet x129388

SPECIAL STILLING BASIN (SEE
CLASS A/B RIPRA DETAIL BELOW) OR TO MAIN
SPLASH PAD POND FOR ADJACENT
DEVELOPMENT (PREFERRED)
PAM OR APPROVED FLOC
AGENT DOSING AT RATE
SPECIFIED BY PROVIDER FOR
TROUT WATERS, CHECK DOSING
ACCURACY ON DAILY BASIS
IMPERVIOUS 01 E /DEWATERING PUMP
TEMPORARY
FLEXIBLE
HOSE
WORKING AREA
PIPING
IMPERVIOUS DIKE
PUMP AROUND PUMP
GROUND. SPECIAL STIWNG' BASIN
FILTER FABRIC FOR
DRAINAGE TYPE 2
(NON- WOVEN)
12" MIN. CLASS A STONE
15' TO 20'
SPECIAL STILLING BASIN
15' MIN
COMPACTED 7' MIN (UNLESS SANDBAGS. USED) °R
EARTH, SILT SOCK OR SANDBAG
STEEP CUT OR FILL SLOPE
UPSLOPE TOE
SIDE SLOPES _
1.5 :-1 (MAX.)
1.5:1 SLOPE (MAX)
— (UNLESS SILT SOCK OR
SANDBAGS USED)
GRADE
CROSS - SECTION
POSITIVE GRADE: 1 -5%
STABILIZE DIVERSION DITCH
WITH PLASTIC
OR OTHER NON ERODABLE LINING
2' MIN.
STEEP - CUT OR FILL SLOPE
PLAN VIEW DIVERSION SIZED TO HANDLE 2Z YR Q OF 33 CFS
AT 1% MINIMUM SLOPE
IFi DIVERSION CHANNEL
�?C!FII I I i ?t A) OR Yl:1I03 IT-0ZIF ;T@ ;01-k-t LPn00Pl7T:ZtIKZM
T. INSTALL SPECIAL STIWNG BASINS AT THE DOWNSTREAM END OF THE DESIGNATED PROJECT" WORKING AREA.
2. THE CONTRACTOR WILL INSTALL THE PUMP AROUND AND THE TEMPORARY PIPING THAT WILL CONVEY THE
BASE FLOW FROM UPSTREAM OF THE WORK SITE
3. INSTALL UPSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKE AND BEGIN PUMPING OPERA71ONS FOR STREAM DIVERSION.
4. INSTALL THE DOWNSTREAM IMPERVIOUS DIKE AND PUMPING APPARATUS IF NEEDED TO DEWATER THE
ENTRAPPED AREA. THE PUMP AND HOSE FOR THIS PURPOSE SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT SIZE TO DEWATER THE
WORK AREA. THIS WATER WILL FLOW INTO A SPECIAL STILLING BASIN.
5. THE CONTRACTOR WILL PERFORM STREAM RESTORATION WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLAN AND
FOLLOWING THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
6. THE CONTRACTOR WILL EXCAVATE ANY ACCUMULATED SILT AND DEWATER BEFORE REMOVAL OF THE
IMPERVIOUS DIKE. REMOVE IMPERVIOUS DIKES, PUMPS, AND TEMPORARY FLEXIBLE HOSE/PIPING STARTING WITH
THE DOWNSTREAM DIKE FIRST.
7. ONCE THE WORKING AREA IS COMPLETED. REMOVE THE STILLING BASINS AND STABILIZE DISTURBED AREAS
WITH SEED AND MULCH.
TOP OF
STREAM BANK
PROVIDE STABILIZED
OUTLET TO STREAM
BANK
NOTES:
1.. EXCAVATION SHALL BE PERFORMED
IN ONLY DRY SECTIONS OF CHANNEL
2 IMPERVIOUS DIKES SHOULD BE
USED TO ISOLATE WORK AREAS FROM
STREAM FLOW.
3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT
DISTURB MORE AREA THAN CAN BE
STABILIZED IN ONE WORKING DAY.
4. THE PUMP AROUND PUMP SHOULD
ADEQUATELY CONVEY 3 CFS FOR
MAINSTEM.
S. PROVIDE STABILZED OUTLET TO
STREAM BANK.
i - DIVERSION PUMP AROUND- OPERATION
13 NUT TU SCALE
RIVERLINK, INC.
Uk*M PROPERTY
DETAILS.
ROSS CREEK WATERSHED
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
REVMM- sir M
-'m 13
I
Mkmd Bdw Enoteewb % 6uw
797 HapoW Rood SuR& 2M
Ashewq, NC 28806
NC Uoense Na: F -1084
Project f'129386
c3�