20200237 Ver 1_SOA_Alamance Church Widening_20200310 (2)

Carpenter, Kristi
From: Ruiz, Melissa <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2020 3:26 PM
To: Norton, April R; Patterson, Robert D
Cc: Carpenter, Kristi
Subject: RE: [External] FW: 20200237 - Alamance Church Rd.
Attachments: SOA_Alamance Church Widening.pdf
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
[e-mail]
The letter has been uploaded and is attached here.
Thanks
Melissa
From: Norton, April R <[e-mail]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2020 12:50 PM
To: Patterson, Robert D <[e-mail]>; Ruiz, Melissa <[e-mail]>
Cc: Carpenter, Kristi <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] FW: 20200237 - Alamance Church Rd.
Hi Melissa. Please be mindful that the 401 WQC application will be placed on hold if the mitigation acceptance letter is
not received by the end of the week.
Please let me know if you have questions.
Thanks,
April
From: Norton, April R
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2020 11:31 AM
To: Patterson, Robert D <[e-mail]>; Ruiz, Melissa <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] FW: 20200237 - Alamance Church Rd.
Hi Melissa. Have you requested mitigation for the 333 sgft of buffer impacts located at Site 3 in Zone 1? I can't seem to
locate the mitigation acceptance letter. If you received the letter could you please forward it to me?
Thanks,
April
From: Patterson, Robert D <[e-mail]>
Sent: Monday, March 09, 2020 11:22 AM
To: Ruiz, Melissa <[e-mail]>
Cc: Norton, April R <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] FW: 20200237 - Alamance Church Rd.

Melissa — replacement sheets is fine. We don't have any other comments. Thanks.
Robert D. Patterson, PE.
Srarta warer Engineer, Dfv. of li'arer Resources
,toe-O-lr D� E North Carolina Department of Environmental Qtmlity
919,7 7.3880 (Office)
....�,. ,�.....`; R.obcrt.Patt onQa—nedcnr,gov
,tvO to ft AAXh Carobv F btaic +iwcrck, Liar av KJ
From: Ruiz, Melissa [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Thursday, March 5, 2020 12:12 PM
To: Patterson, Robert D <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] FW: 20200237 - Alamance Church Rd.
External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
report.spam@'
I just got edits back from our sub and will upload them. Would you prefer a replacement page or the whole SE&C with the
page swapped out? Also wanted to know if you had any questions or comments for the stormwater part or if this is the
only pending item?
Thanks for your patience with the planting plan submittals.
Melissa
From: Patterson, Robert D <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, March 5, 2020 9:17 AM
To: Ruiz, Melissa <[e-mail]>
Cc: Norton, April R <[e-mail]>
Subject: RE: [External] FW: 20200237 - Alamance Church Rd.
Melissa — We received the add. info. you submitted. It does include the buffer re -planting plan, but the plans do not
indicate where the contractor is supposed to do the planting. Thanks.
lkobert D. Patterson, PE
r� _-. Skwm rarerEngiin"r, i. ofWaler Resourc&
Noy lh Carolina l3cpartmcgt ofEgtiromgr l *
919,7o?, s. (+ ice)
•_.`.•" -: � Y 'Rabreri��tit�san'>�sie�.ganr
0@WlrRnto s'iff --, r. :4* f?ift Mar CwoVwA Aa rLawaw
+n W b* 1P[I"Pw0
From: Ruiz, Melissa [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2020 7:19 AM
To: Patterson, Robert D <[e-mail]>
Cc: Norton, April R <[e-mail]>
Subject: [External] FW: 20200237 - Alamance Church Rd.
F-
External email. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verify. Send all suspicious email as an attachment to
2

Robert,
Sorry I was out of the office today and am traveling back today. Do you have a specific window of time that works best to
discuss on the phone? In the meantime, I have a few responses to your questions which may help our discussion.
Thanks
Melissa
From: Patterson, Robert D <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2020 2:46 PM
To: Ruiz, Melissa <[e-mail]>
Cc: Norton, April R <[e-mail]>
Subject: 20200237 - Alamance Church Rd.
Melissa,
I left you a voicemail today about this project. I'm helping April out with reviews while she's on leave (she'll be back next
week). I have a few questions about the subject application. It's probably easier to work through these over the phone,
so let me know when would be a good time to discuss.
1. Please explain why the temporary impacts are needed in some parts but not others where the road is the same
distance from the parallel stream.
Buffer impacts were shown in all location that temporary construction easement is being obtained and
encroaches the buffer beyond the limits of the existing transportation facility.
22 + 00
PCN states that the temporary buffer impacts at sites 1 and 2 are due to installation of retaining walls. However,
the plans only appear to show a very small length of wall at site 2 (circled in red below). Temporary impacts are
shown where no wall is shown. Is there a proposed wall along the edge of the sidewalk? The profiles don't seem
to show that. Please clarify.
See response to question #1.

ALLOWABI.� IMPACTS ZONE 1
DENOTES ;.Ffi,+MFACTS IN
rzIiRvrF.IAIdTFR
Y FSITE 2
3. What type of vegetation does the existing buffer area shown with temporary impacts consist of
(herbaceous/shrubs/trees)? A re -planting plan may be needed.
The existing buffer is vegetated with trees. We can provide a re -planting plan like the ones we usually do for
NCDOT projects.
4. I'm having difficulty determining what the top "boundary' of the impact polygons are based on at all four sites.
Is it the r/w line, existing transportation facility limits, or other? One example is highlighted below.
The impact top boundary follows the toe of the fill slope for the existing transportation facility.
CE
4

Robw D. Paittaran, PE
5ror-mil artr Engineer, Ism of Waa'rr Resources
Nardi Carolina DcWmenl of EnviramnenuI Qumlity
919,70735t4 (office)
,._a •�� Rvb+crl.PaltcrsonAInwdcnr,gv
tr :r µ►au i#�e ul tt+�7:f77���h3,b#N�z. r—a,dxA-: L 1 F i(l7 1p fit :n� i�l"�iy
trrrr"M rbrlva+7lsi ►r��Iy�

Restoration Systems, LLC
1101 Haynes St. Suite 211
Raleigh, North Carolina
Ph: [phone]
Fx: [phone]
Statement of Mitigation Credit Availability
Cape Fear 03030002
Haw (Jordan Lake)
Bass Mountain Mitigation Bank
March 10, 2020
NC Division of Water Resources
Re: Availability of Compensatory Stream Credits
Project: Alamance Church Widening
This document confirms that 89,248 sf of Riparian Buffer Credits (Credits) from the Bass
Mountain Mitigation Bank are currently available and all or a portion may be used, once
transferred, for compensatory mitigation relative to the Alamance Church Widening project, and
as proposed by City of Greensboro (Applicant).
The Applicant may ultimately purchase the Credits, if they are available, following Permit issuance.
Should the Applicant purchase the Credits at that time, we will complete and execute the Mitigation
Credit Transfer Certificate (Certificate) within five (5) days of receipt of the full purchase price.
We will additionally provide copies of the completed and executed Certificate to the Applicant, the
Division of Water Resources (DWR) and, if needed, other regulatory agencies. In addition, we will
provide DWR with an updated copy of the Bank's Ledger, reflecting the transaction. Transaction
information in the updated Bank Ledger will include relevant Permit and Applicant information as
well as the number and resource type of the debited Credits.
Should your office have any questions, please contact me at 919.334.9123.
Sincerely,
J 1bv� A--
Tiffani Bylow
Restoration Systems, LLC