Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20091168 Ver 1_More Info Received_20091119#S&ME November 19, 2009 North Carolina Division of Water Quality Wetlands and Stormwater Branch 401 Oversight/Express Permitting Unit 1650 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650 Attention: Ms. Amy Chapman Reference: Request for More Information Submittal Pilot Lions Park Franklin County, North Carolina S&ME Project No. 1051-09-072 Dear Ms. Chapman: oq - ik LO 00 L,@DI?I[_ g__2? N0 1 9 2009 DEW - WATER OUAC, I y WET1J1N Mo STORMWATER BRA 04 S&ME, Inc. (S&ME) wishes to submit the information pertaining to the permit application for the above-referenced project requested by your office in the letter dated November 9, 2009. Please find attached the stormwater plans showing diffuse flow submitted by Site Solutions and approved by Mike Randall of the Stormwater Permitting Unit on November 16, 2009. We have attached the stormwater permit application packet that includes the required BMP supplement form and calculations, drainage area maps (DA-1, DA-2) showing inventory of imperviousness in each drainage area, and updated site plans (dated November 9, 2009) previously included with the PCN. Note that the site plan updates do not change any calculations shown on the PCN. Also attached are two bound copies of the complete stormwater and erosion control calculations. The included compact disk contains a full schedule of drawings in PDF format for the Pilot Lions Park project. If we can provide additional information or answer questions you may have, please feel free to contact Jason Volker with S&ME at 919-880-3137. Sincerely, S&ME Jason Volker, L.S.S. Environmental Scientist Attachments: Stormwater Management Permit Application (with BMP Supplement Form) Drainage Area Maps DA-1, DA-2 Demolition Plan (and Wetland Survey) (11/9/09) S&ME, INC. / 3201 Spring Forest Road / Raleigh, NC 27616 / p 919.872.2660 f 919.876.3958 / www.smeinc.com Site Plan (11/9/09) Grading/Drainage Plan (11/9/09) Site (Boardwalk) Construction Details (11/9/09) Compact Disk of Approved Site Plans Letter of Transmittal TO NCDENR-DWQ V*W 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 DATE l 10/8/2009 .toa NO. 3043 AMnON Mike Randell RE: Stormwater Management Permit Review for Pilot Lions Park o q - t i Lo S Y Is SOLUTIONS 2 3 2 0 t ??'`?`" W. Morehead Street Charlotte, NC 28208 P 704.521.9880 F 704.521.8955 www.sitesolutlonspa. mm WE ARE SENDING YOU: ? shop drawings ? Copy of letter ? AttacW ? Under separate cover via ? Prints ? Plan ? Change order ? Samples ? Specdiotbns COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 2 10/8/2009 1 Stormwater Management Permit Applications (1 original & 1 copy) 2 10/812009 2,3 Swale 5upplement Form (1 original & 1 copy), Swale 0&M Agreement (1 original & 1 copy) 1 10/8/2009 5,6,7,6 Detailed Narrative, 4L-pmt 2 10/8/2009 9 Construction Plans 2 1018/2009 10 Stormwater Calculations THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: R1 For approval ? Approved as S Wlfted ? Resubmit ? For your use ? Approved as rated ? submit ? As requested ? Returned for corrections ? Return For review and mmmmt REMARKS Enclosed are the items needed for the Stormwater Management Permit review. Please let me know if there are any extra items that are needed for this review or if you have any questions regarding this project. My direct line is (704)831-5678. Thanks, Tristan uu s. DENR - WATER QUALITY COPY TO SIGNED: Tristan Teasley Pilot Lions Park - Detailed Pro! ect Narrative ` The proposed project is located northwest of the intersection of SR 1745 Clyde Pearce Road and SR 1744 Pilot Bypass Road near Zebulon, NC. This project includes the construction of two (2) new baseball fields, a picnic shelter, playground, and a new parking facility. The parking facility will connect to the existing parking lot at the adjacent Pilot Lions Club. The property is an existing open un-maintained lawn/field containing a small area of wetlands on the northern most section of the property. The existing ground surface primarily slopes to the center of the property (to a draw) at around 3%, with contours ranging from 322.0 to 350.01 This project drains to Non-SA or Non-ORW Waters and will adhere to the requirements set forth in the recent revisions to the NC General Statues (15A NCAC 2 H.1000). The receiving stream name is Moccasin Creek and is classified as a "C" Aquatic Life, and "NSW "nutrient sensitive waters. Based on the fact that this project is defined as low density, the drainage area is compiled into a single area (per #9 on the "Stormwater Management Permit Application Form"). This project falls under a low-density condition, because the overall Built Upon Area (BUA) is 11.70%, which is less than the maximum of 24%. There are some areas that have a higher BUA than the overall BUA for this property, however they are being treated by a grass swale that is 175 feet in length. Per the conversation between Mike Randell (NCDWQ) and Tristan Teasley (Site Solutions) on 5-4-09, if the areas of high densities are treated in a grass swale (using NCDWQ guidelines) and the swale has a minimum length of 100 feet to the discharge point, the project will still qualify as a low-density project. Since this project falls under the low-density classification, there is no requirement for detention or water quality for this site. The use of vegetative conveyances have been used to the maximum extent practicable. Because this project is in Franklin County (within the Neuse River Basin), it must meet the nutrient removal requirements per NC Rules 15A NCAC 2B .0235. This rule states that the required post-development nitrogen load must be reduced to 3.6 lb/ac/yr. The state provided spreadsheet shows the post developed nitrogen loading level at 2.231b/ac/yr which is under the 3.6 lb/ac/yr requirement, therefore no BMP's will be needed for nutrient removal. The proposed swales are designed on the requirements for "Conveyance Swales not Seeking Pollutant Credit". The offsite flow (that was originally going thm our project) will now bypass around our project via "Clean Water" grassed swales, which will be lined for extra sediment control. The storm conveyance calculations use the rational method and a storm design frequency of 10-years. DWQ USE ONLY Date Received Fee Paid Permit Number Applicable Rules: ? Coastal SW -1995 ? Coastal SW - 2008 ? Ph II - Post Construction (select all tint apply) ? Non-Coastal SW- HQW/ORW Waters ? Universal Stormwater Management Plan ? Other WQ M t Plan: State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM ; This form. may be photocopied for use as an original 1. GENERAL INFORMATION 1. Project Name (subdivision, facility, or establishment name - should be consistent with project name on plans, specifications, letters, operation and maintenance agreements, etc.): Pilot Lions Park 2. Location of Project (street address): 38 Pilot Bypass Road Ci ty:Zebulon County:Franklin Zip:27597 3. Directions to project (from nearest major intersection): Pilot Bypass Road is located approximately 0.35 miles north of the intersection of Old US 64 HWY and NC 39 HWY Project is on the north side of Pilot Bypass Road and is approximately 0.18 miles from the intersection of Pilot Bypass Road and NC 39 HWY 4. Latitude:35* 53' 18" N Longitude:78° 16'03" W of the main entrance to the project. II. PERMIT INFORMATION: 1. a. Specify whether project is (check one): ®New []Modification b. If this application is being submitted as the result of a modification to an existing permit, list the existing permit munber , its issue date (if known) , and the status of construction: []Not Started []Partially Completed* [I Completed* *provide a designer's certification 2. Specify the type of project (check one): ©Low Density []High Density []Drains to an Offsite Stormwater System []Other 3. If this application is being submitted as the result of a previously returned application or a letter from DWQ requesting a state stormwater management permit application, list the stormwater project number, if assigned, and the previous name of the project, if different than currently proposed, 4. a. Additional Project Requirements (check applicable blanks; information on required state permits can be obtained by contacting the Customer Service Center at 1-877-623-6748): ?CAMA Major ?NPDES Industrial Stormwater ®Sedimentation/Erosion Control: 13.72 ac of Disturbed Area []404/401 Permit: Proposed Impacts b. If any of these permits have already been acquired please provide the Project Name, Project/Permit Number, issue date and the type of each permit: Form SWU-101 Version 07July2009 Page 1 of 6 in. CONTACT INFORMATION 1, a. Print Applicant / Signing Official's name and title (specifically the developer, property owner, lessee, designated government official, individual, etc. who owns the project): Applicant/Orgarv Signing Official & b. Contact information for person listed in item la above: Street Address:113 Market Street City:Louisburiz State:NC Zip:27549 Mailing Address (if applicable):113 Market Street City:Louisbure State:NC Zip :27549 Phone: (919 ) 496-6624 Fax: (919 ) 496-7656 Email-,ogreene@franklincolm!ync.us c. Please check the appropriate box. The applicant listed above is: © The property owner (Skip to Contact Information, item 3a) ? Lessee* (Attach a copy of the lease agreement and complete Contact Information, item 2a and 2b below) ? Purchaser* (Attach a copy of the pending sales agreement and complete Contact Information, item 2a and 2b below) ? Developer* (Complete Contact Information, item 2a and 2b below.) 2. a. Print Property Owner's name and title below, if you are the lessee, purchaser or developer. (This is the person who owns the property that the project is located on): Property Owner/Organization: R ab e r{- L. C yun n S tin / Frn n L i ?n C o t t h L Signing Official & Title: R c) h c r t S wri n c o r) Ph a i rf oa to b. Contact information for person listed in item 2a above: Street Address: 113 Mnykei- S+reef City: Lo aic era State: I)C Zip: ag5L1 Mailing Address (if applicable): (.some) a.. City: State: Zip: Phone: ( 0 M ) LIQ b - :A7 CI Fax: L IQ ) L( Q Le - Qtr R 3 Email: 3. a. (Optional) Print the name and title of another contact such as the project's construction supervisor or other person who can answer questions about the project: Other Contact Person/Organization: Signing Official & Title: b. Contact information for person listed in item 3a above: Mailing Address: City: State: Zip: Phone: ( ) Fax: Email: 4. Local jurisdiction for building permits: Point of Contact: Phone #: Fomi SWU-101 Version 071uly2009 Page 2 of 6 IV: PROJECT INFORMATION 2. a. If claiming vested rights, identify the supporting documents provided and the date they were approved: ' ? Approval of a Site Specific Development Plan or PUD Approval Date: ? Valid Building Permit Issued Date: ? Other: Date: b.Identify the regulation(s) the project has been designed in accordance with: ? Coastal SW -1995 ? Ph 11 - Post Construction 3. Stormwater runoff from this project drains to the Neuse River basin. 4. Total Property Area: 18.38 acres 5. Total Coastal Wetlands Area: 0 acres 6. Total Surface Water Area: 0 acres 7. Total Property Area (4) -Total Coastal Wetlands Area (5) -Total Surface Water Area (6) =Total Project Area+: 18.38 acres + Total project area shall be calculated to exclude the following: the normal pool of impounded structures, the area between the banks of streams and rivers, the area below the Normal High Water (NHW) line-or Mean High Water (MHW) line, and coastal wetlands landward from the NHW (or MHW) line. The resultant project area is used to calculate overall percent built upon area (BLIA). Non-coastal wetlands landward of the NHW (or MHW) line may be included in the total project area. 8. Project percent of impervious area: (Total Impervious Area / Total Project Area) X 100 =11.70 % 9. How many drainage areas does the project have?1(For high density, count 1 for each proposed engineered stormwater BMP. For low density and other projects, use 1 for the whole property area) 10. Complete the following information for each drainage area identified in Project Information item 9. If there are more than four drainage areas in the project, attach an additional sheet with the information for each area provided in the same format as below. Basinanfprmatipn . Drama ,..Area 1 Dtairage: urea Drain e Area - Drainage Aiea Receiving Stream Name Moccasin Creek Stream Class * C; NSW Stream Index Number * 27-53-(0.5) Total Drainage Area (so 800,633 On-site Drainage Area (sf) 800,633 Off-site Drainage Area (sf) N/A Proposed Impervious Area** (sf) 93,350 % Impervious Area** (total) 11.70 Im ervious";surface Area Drama e'Area, l Drains e Area _ 17raina e Area , i.l rama a Area On-site Buildings/Lots (sf) 6,632 On-site Streets (so 3,892 On-site Parking (so 29,962 On-site Sidewalks (so 18,756 Other on-site (so N/A Future (so 34,108 Off-site (sf) N/A Existing BUA*** (so 37,531 Total (sf): 130,881 , * Stream Class and Index Number can be determined at: http://h2o.erir-.state.iic.us/binrslreports/reportsWB.html hn ervious area is defined as the built upon area including, but not limited to, buildings, roads, parking areas, sideewalb, gravel areas, etc. *** Report only that amount of existing BLIA that will remain after development. Do not report any existing BLIA that is to be reproved and which will be replaced by new BUA. Form SWU-101 Version 07July2009 Page 3 of 6 In the svace vrovided below, briefly summarize how the stormwater runoff will be treated. 11: How was the off-site impervious area listed above determined? Provide documentation. Protects in Union County: Contact DWQ Central Office staff to check if the project is located tivithin a Threaten `gym '4C 02B .064. ' ' Endangered Species watershed that may be subject to more stringent stornnvater requirements as per NC V. SUPPLEMENT AND O&M FORMS The applicable state stormwater management permit supplement and operation and maintenance (O&M) forms must be submitted for each BMP specified for this project. The latest versions of the forms can be downloaded from htW://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/bmp , forms htm. VI. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Only complete application packages will be accepted and reviewed by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ). A complete package includes all of the items listed below. A detailed application instruction sheet and BMP checklists are available from http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/bmp_fonns.htm. The complete application package should be submitted to the appropriate DWQ Office. (The appropriate office may be found by locating project on the interactive online map at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/msi_maps.htm.) Please indicate that the following required information have been provided by initialing in the space provided for each item. All original documents MUST be signed and initialed in blue ink. Download the latest versions for each submitted application package from http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/-bmp--,forms.htrn. 1. Original and one copy of the Stormwater Management Permit Application Form. 2. Original and one copy of the signed and notarized Deed Restrictions & Protective Covenants Form. (if required as per Part VII below) 3. Original of the applicable Supplement Form(s) (sealed, signed and dated) and O&M agreement(s) for each BMP. Initials TM /M T 4. Permit application processing fee of $505 payable to NCDENR. (For an Express review, refer to _'r/yt T http://www.envhiLlR.org/12ages/onestoiRgLcRress.hb:rd for information on the Express program and the associated fees. Contact the appropriate regional office Express Permit Coordinator for additional information and to schedule the required application meeting.) 5. A detailed narrative (one to two pages) describing the stormwater treatment/management for TM i 6. A USGS map identifying the site location. If the receiving stream is reported as class SA or the 'm T receiving stream drains to class SA waters within 'A mile of the site boundary, include the 1h mile radius on the map. 7. Sealed, signed and dated calculations. Tiv, T 8. Two sets of plans folded to 8.5" x 14" (sealed, signed, & dated), including. T )V?T a. Development/Project name. b. Engineer and firm. c. Location map with named streets and NCSR numbers. d. Legend. e. North arrow. f. Scale. g. Revision number and dates. h. Identify all surface waters on the plans by delineating the normal pool elevation of impounded structures, the banks of streams and rivers, the MHW or NHW line of tidal waters, and any coastal wetlands landward of the MHW or NHW lines. • Delineate the vegetated buffer landward from the normal pool elevation of impounded structures, the banks of streams or rivers, and the MHW (or NHW) of tidal waters. i. Dimensioned property/project boundary with bearings & distances. j. Site Layout with all BUA identified and dimensioned. k. Existing contours, proposed contours, spot elevations, finished floor elevations. 1. Details of roads, drainage features, collection systems, and stormwater control measures. m. Wetlands delineated, or a note on the plans that none exist. (Must be delineated by a qualified person. Provide documentation of qualifications and identify the person who made the determination on the plans. n. Existing drainage (including off-site), drainage easements, pipe sizes, runoff calculations. o. Drainage areas delineated (included in the main set of plans, not as a separate document). p. Vegetated buffers (where required). Form SWU-101 Version 07Juty2009 Page 4 of 6 Copy of any applicable soils report with the associated SHWT elevations (Please identify T-M T elevations in addition to depths) as well as a map of the boring locations with the existing elevations and boring logs. Include an 8.5"x11" copy of the NRCS County Soils map with the project area clearly delineated. For projects with infiltration BMPs, the report should also'- i ' include the soil type, expected infiltration rate, and the method of determining the infiltr}on -rate. (Infiltration Devices submitted to WiRO: Schedule a site visit for DWQ to verify the SHWT pfiot to submittal, (910) 796-7378.), , 10. A copy of the most current property deed. Deed book 2007 Page No: 25 . "T _ 11. For corporations and limited liability corporations (LLC): Provide documentation from the NC WA 3 Secretary of State or other official documentation, which supports the titles and positions held by the persons listed in Contact Information, item 1a, 2a, and/or 3a per NCAC 2H.1003(e). The corporation or LLC must be listed as an active corporation in good standing with the NC Secretary of State, otherwise the application will be returned. http: / /www.secretaiy.state.nc.us/CorRorations/`-CSearch.asl2x VII. DEED RESTRICTIONS AND PROTECTIVE COVENANTS For all subdivisions, outparcels, and future development, the appropriate property restrictions and protective covenants are required to be recorded prior to the sale of any lot. If lot sizes vary significantly or the proposed BUA allocations vary, a table listing each lot number, lot size, and the allowable built-upon area must be provided as an attachment to the completed and notarized deed restriction form. The appropriate deed restrictions and protective covenants forms can be downloaded from http//h2o.enr.state.nc.us/su/bmp forms.htm#deed restrictions. Download the latest versions for each submittal. In the instances where the applicant is different than the property owner, it is the responsibility of the property owner to sign the deed restrictions and protective covenants form while the applicant is responsible for ensuring that the deed restrictions are recorded. By the notarized signature(s) below, the permit holder(s) certify that the recorded property restrictions and protective covenants for this project, if required, shall include all the items required in the permit and listed on the forms available on the website, that the covenants will be binding on all parties and persons claiming under them, that they will ran with the land, that the required covenants cannot be changed or deleted without concurrence from the NC DWQ, and that they will be recorded prior to the sale of any lot. VIII. CONSULTANT INFORMATION AND AUTHORIZATION Applicant: Complete this section if you wish to designate authority to another individual and/or firm (such as a consulting engineer and/or firm) so that they may provide information on your behalf for this project (such as addressing requests for additional information). Consulting Engineer-Mark Breen Consulting Firm: Site Solutions Mailing Address:2320 West Morehead Street City:Charlotte State:NC Zip:28216 Phone: (704 ) 521-9880 Fax: (704 ) 521-8955 Email:mbreen®sitesolutionspa.com IX. PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION (if Contact Information, item 2 has been filled out, complete this section) 1, (print or type name of person listed in Contact Information, item 2a) RUke rf L S Sri ns ro certify that I own the property identified in this permit application, and thus give permission to (print or type mmne of person listed in Contact Information, item 1a) d I i Vri- G rrene- with (print or type name of organization listed in Contact Information, item IN to develop the project as currently proposed. A copy of the lease agreement or pending property sales contr cth s been provided with the submittal, which indicates the party responsible for the operation and maintenance of the stormwater system. Form SWU-101 Version 07July2009 Page 5 of 6 As the legal property owner I acknowledge, understand, and agree by my signature below, that jpy designated agent (entity listed in Contact Information, item 1) dissolves their company and/or cancels or 'a on their lease agreement, or pending sale, responsibility for compliance with the DWQ Stormwater pe ack to me, the property owner. As the property owner, it is my responsibility to notify DWQ immediately a completed Name/Ownership Change Form witl-dn 30 days; otherwise I will be operating a stormw t facility without a valid permit. I understand that the operation of a stormwater treatment facility ou a v permit is a violation of NC General Statue 143-215.1 and may result in appropriate enforcement ac o includin4 the assessment of civil penalties of up to $25,000 per day, pursuant to NCGS 143-215.6. Signature: tobyx- z U#?? Date: 16 i, Vr; s L o Ci - ki f--)g __,a Notary Public for the State of Norlb Union county of - Fro n iz? i; n- do hereby certify that Rnlaeil L ?IA) f] Q ?; on -- - - - - - personally appeared before me this 5 day of bHnbEr - -RQ9 and acknowledge the due execution of the application for a stormwater permit. Witness my hand -n % 4411V 0 and official seal, ??61)fp-u JI, 4n"-"d-d4 0 SEAL My commission expires 3- QLI - ?Z)J:3 X. APPLICANT'S CERTUICATION 1, (print or hjpe naine of person listed in Contact In/brinntion, itent 2) C)) - JVer Aye-ej-)e. certify that the information included on this permit application form is, to the best of my knowledge, correct and that the project will be constructed in conformance with the approved plans, that the required deed restrictions and protective covenants will be recorded, and that the proposed project complies with the requirements of the applicable stormwater rules under 15A NCAC 2kl.1000, SL 2006-246 (Ph. 11 - Post Construction) or SL 2008-211. Date:/0 - 6'-01 I r-I She n G. ki OQ a Notary Public for the State ofNi)rtk QQr8hQ6 County of J -Fmnki in. doherebycertify that Oliver L.Greene, Jr. personally appeared before me this 5 dav of k-?F)ber cqcrpan?d paowledge the due execution of the application for a stormwater permit. Witness my hand and official se.- - Z? / aiLl 10 I 4:1? "n :0 .0 U B t.\G ?i T tt- 4-411V co 121// 1//Iftl I I I I I I I I % 00 SEAL My commission expires - P q - a 0) 3 Form SWU-101 Version 07July2OO9 Page 6 of 6 Permit Number. (to be provided by DWQ) 'd?/` jloF?,apr?R NCDENR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM - 401 CERTIFICATION APPLICATION FORM GRASSED SWALE SUPPLEMENT;., . This form must be filled out, printed and submitted. The Required Items Checklist (Part Ill) must also be filled out, printed and submitted along with all of the required information, Project name Pilot Clons.Park Contact name Mark B"M-en Phone number (704} 521-9880 Date St ptembef 14, 2009 : Drainage area number Site Characteristics Drainage area 317;988.00 t? Impervious area 112,385.00 f? Percent impervious 35.3%% Design rainfall depth 1.00 Inch Peak Flow Calculations 10-yr storm runoff depth in 10-yr storm intensity - 4.47 - : In/hr Post-development 10-yr storm peak flow 22,15 ft3/sec Velocity Maximum non-erosive velocity.(peak 10-year storm) 5.00 ftlsec Soil characteristics (enter Y below) Sand/slit (easily erodible) x - Clay mix (erosion resistant) - Grass Type (enter Y below) Bermuda x _ Tall fescue Bahiagrass Kentucky bluegrass Grass-legume mixture Swale type: Fill out one of the options below: Option 1: Curb Outlet Swale: Y (Y or N) Maximum velocity -5.00 Side slopes -3.00 :1 Swale length 175,00 ft Option 2: Swale Seeking Pollutant Credit ('For-Credir Swale): N (Y or N) Maximum velocity for 10-yr storm fl/sec Side slopes Swale length ft OK Insufficient side slopes. Max Is 5:1. OK Form SW401-Grassed Swale-Rev.4 Parts I and II. Project Design Summary, Page 1 of 2 Peril Number. (to be provided by DWQ) V Swale Characteristics Swale Shape: Enter an Y In the appropriate cell below: Trapezoidal Parabolic V-shaped Width of the bottom of the Swale Width of the top of the Swale Additional Information Is the Swale sized for all runoff from ultimate build-out? Is the BMP located In a proposed drainage easement with a recorded access easement to a public Right of Way (ROW)? What Is the distance from the bottom of the Swale to the SHWT? What is the ground level elevation? What is the elevation of the bottom of the Swale? What Is the SHWT elevation? What Is the longitudinal slope of the swale? What is the depth of freeboard? x 15.00 ft 35.00 ft OK Insufficient ROW location. OK OK Form SW401-Grassed Swale-Rev.4 Parts I and II. Project Design Summary, Page 2 or 2 Permit Name: (to be provided by DGVQ) Drainage Area Number: Grassed Swale Operation and Maintenance Agreement:.. I will keep a maintenance record on this BUT. This maintenance record will be kept in a log in a known set location. Any deficient BMP elements noted in the inspection will be corrected, repaired or replaced immediately. These deficiencies can affect the integrity of structures, safety of the public, and the removal efficiency of the BNT. Important maintenance procedures: - The drainage area of the grassed swale will be carefully managed to reduce the sediment load to the grassed swale. - After the first-time fertilization to establish the grass in the swale, fertilizer will not be applied to the grassed swale. Tlie grassed swale will be inspected once a quarter. Records of operation and maintenance will be kept in a known set location and will be available upon request. Inspection activities shall be performed as follows. Any problems that are found shall be repaired immediately. BMP element: Potential problem: How I will rernediate the problem: The entire length of the Trash/ debris is present. Remove the trash/ debris. swale Areas of bare soil and/or Regrade the soil if necessary to erosive gullies have formed. remove the gully, and then re-sod (or plant with other appropriate species) and water until established. Provide lime and a one-time fertilizer application. Sediment covers the grass at Remove sediment and dispose in an the bottom of the swale. area that will not impact streams or BMPs. Re-sod if necessary. Vegetation is too short or too Maintain vegetation at a height of long. approximately six inches. The receiving water Erosion or other signs of Contact the NC Division of Water damage have occurred at the Quality 401 Oversight Unit at 919- outlet. 733-1786. Form SW401-Grassed Swale O&M-Rev.3 Page 1 of 2 Permit Number: (to be provided by DYYQ) I acknowledge and agree by my signature below that I am responsible for the ., performance of the maintenance procedures listed above. I agree to notify DWQ of any problems with the system or prior to any changes to the system or responsible party. Project nameTilot Lions Park BMP drainage area number:#1 Print name:Oliver Greene TitleTranklin County Parks and Recreation Interim Director Address: 113 Market Street Phone:(919) 496-6624 Signature: C-) Date: 1-3, \- 0 Note: The legally responsible party should not be a homeo\Nmers association unless more than 50% of the lots have been sold and a resident of the subdivision has been named the president. I, A&.,' r ?\\-k , a Notary Public for the State of bc?h?G ?'y? i , County Of V1 , do hereby certify that i ?)p(' ?. • ?=e- e personally appeared before me this J:h-51 day of 5 Olen\ btr` t3 LA , and acknowledge the due execution of the forgoing grassed swale maintenance requirements. Witness my hand and official seal, B. #0TAq} In ti AV6L1G ??, ?/rC?N COUr' ',.L \''s SEAL My commission expires /0 IcLoLozul Form SW401-Grassed Swale O&M-Rev.3 Page 2 of 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Storm Water Et Erosion Control Calculations For: Pilot Lions Park Project #3043A Zebulon, North Carolina November 9, 2009 T E O??A 2 3 2 0 W. Morehead Street Charlotte, NC 28208 Landscape Architecture Site Planning Civil Engineering www.sitesolutionspa.com Telephone-704-521-9880 Facsimile-704-521-8955 aR0Z s r SEAL 029928 1 1 1 1 1 Pilot Lions Park Project #3043A Storm Water Calculations TABLE OF CONTENTS I ......................SITE NARRATIVE II ....................EXISTING SITE DATA Location Map USGS Map Soils Map Hydrologic Soil Data III ...................EROSION CONTROL CALCULATIONS Sediment Basin Rip-Rap Aprons Ditch Liners IV ...................STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS NOAA Storm Data Haestad Storm Tabulations Time of Concentration Calcs. Storm Schedule StormCad Output Data Swale Flow Calculations Grass Swale Supplement Form Culvert Calculations V ......................NEUSE RIVER NUTRIENT CALCULATIONS Total Nitrogen and Total Phosphorus Loading Calculations VI ........................COMPOSITE DRAINAGE AREA MAP 11 I. SITE NARRATIVE 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Pilot Lions Park- Detailed Project Narrative The proposed project is located northwest of the intersection of SR 1745 Clyde Pearce Road and SR 1744 Pilot Bypass Road near Zebulon, NC. This project includes the construction of two (2) new baseball fields, a picnic shelter, playground, and a new parking facility. The parking facility will connect to the existing parking lot at the adjacent Pilot Lions Club. The property is an existing open un-maintained lawn/field containing a small area of wetlands on the northern most section of the property. The existing ground surface primarily slopes to the center of the property (to a draw) at around 3%, with contours ranging from 322.0 to 350.0 ft. This project drains to Non-SA or Non-ORW Waters and will adhere to the requirements set forth in the recent revisions to the NC General Statues (15A NCAC 2 H .1000). The receiving stream name is Moccasin Creek and is classified as a "C" Aquatic Life, and "NSW" nutrient sensitive waters. Based on the fact that this project is defined as low density, the drainage area is compiled into a single area (per #9 on the "Stormwater Management Permit Application Form"). This project falls under a low-density condition, because the overall Built Upon Area (BUA) is 11.70%, which is less than the maximum of 24%. There are some areas that have a higher BUA than the overall BUA for this property, however they are being treated by a grass swale that is 175 feet in length. Per the conversation between Mike Randell (NCDWQ) and Tristan Teasley (Site Solutions) on 5-4-09, if the areas of high densities are treated in a grass swale (using NCDWQ guidelines) and the swale has a minimum length of 100 feet to the discharge point, the project will still qualify as a low-density project. Since this project falls under the low-density classification, there is no requirement for detention or water quality for this site. The use of vegetative conveyances have been used to the maximum extent practicable. Because this project is in Franklin County (within the Neuse River Basin), it must meet the nutrient removal requirements per NC Rules 15A NCAC 2B .0235. This rule states that the required post-development nitrogen load must be reduced to 3.6 lb/ac/yr. The state provided spreadsheet shows the post developed nitrogen loading level at 2.231b/ac/yr which is under the 3.61b/ac/yr requirement, therefore no BMP's will be needed for nutrient removal. The proposed swales are designed on the requirements for "Conveyance Swales not Seeking Pollutant Credit". The offsite flow (that was originally going thru our project) will now bypass around our project via "Clean Water" grassed swales, which will be lined for extra sediment control. The storm conveyance calculations use the rational method and a storm design frequency of 10-years. I? 11 1 1 1 1 1 II. EXISTING SITE DATA Location Map USGS Map Soils Map Hydrologic Soil Data 1 �l �'I cD ti _ n �F k +•%r"`-^•:�&m`.`w,-?g;,% �k Y�h"'�;i s. 5 _ ; °L V&Y `S �O W ciO 1 h �+ ° P3C 3�J Kvey S m TOPO! map printed on 09/15/09 from "North Carolina.tpo" and "Untitled.tpg" -.wu vv rd-lr,uuu vv 78°16.000' W WGG8478o15.000' W o o r ?? r" I ,+ 1, ?? k Jf ?' t \.. sr X257-' ,s, .. .G$ /?4, `r-v` ?__• _ '--'" S L m .. .r t .yam i \ • • Y, f+ 1r 1 ? i ??. ci' ;AJ IT, 1 t \ t " 1 } f ?,? ` l o to k A ?) > r s°? / e ;tij ?? ms's Xy 4 ' Tai +?t Cem 'IT ? ?_ ? _ ,"`? ? ? ? p _?'"?1 Etir ? f, to ? o +v ?E ?? ( - , ? L • ? I y if r3B TI s <em. G i '. ,j "ems s l ???? ^\ ? ? f a -- ? iS5{ K'ueros ., T ? ?ir > - > C n t i 334 gym. ? p t ?41z r a 1 Lf) Ln ?? :Ir a -'f /?t , r A_ Cem ,"4 xs ty .J 1 1 C ry M ?? 1 ?Nr f t xY f J `-'•' S''`r I,- '\ f serf CCt ?' r ?\ t / tl Y? ?1?? 3 \? Cem c em i. I f t: / y? r , )<?- F M 7aa m' I -iSt?r C % 7 f ? • f? 76'18.000- W 78° 17.000' W Tao i nnn n YVVJO'F 1 WE 15.uuu W MN TN I78 9`/.° ®000 fEEI 0 500 1000 PATERS Printed from TOPO1 02001 National Geographic Hollings (www.topo.cora) 0 O O ti L(t O In M Z n n >7 ) ) 7 7 7 35* 53' 26" 35* 53' 11 Soil Map-Franklin County, North Carolina 0 m m m in m r` AY M ? O v 3 pr- 10 N ? ?a??.;'L"'?`? ? a ,,'? S W,?yJr?ii? ?' ? e??,: h , - ??•S.i.: ? 1,h `-s'u:'91. 1? ` Fz y 'FM S i V * f ry h *.11?'? w ,? Y *' ? ? 31t A.. A, , "J. IZ x t ? f S., 1A - 441 y P y ?Y } ?4rv T . it 0 Map Scale. 1:2,250 d pnntea on A size (8.5" x 11") sheet m N Meters A 0 20 40 80 120 Feet 0 50 100 200 300 ' USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey I_ Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey ?i m 9/1 412 0 0 9 Page 1 of 3 35° 53' 26' 35' 53' 10' Soil Map-Franklin County, North Carolina MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) (Z very stony spot Map Scale: 1:2,260 if printed on A size (8.5" x 11 ") sheet. Area of Interest (AOI) ! wet Spot The soil surveys that comprise your A01 were mapped at 1:24,000. Soils Soil Map Units . Other Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for accurate map Special Line Features measurements. Special Point Features Gutty Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service ?l Blowout Short Steep Slope Web Soil Survey URL: http:/Avebsoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov Borrow Pit Coordinate System: UTM Zone 17N NAD83 X Clay spot ^ Other This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of Political Features the version date(s) listed below. e Closed Depression 0 Cities Soil Survey Area: Franklin County, North Carolina X Gravel Pk Water Features Survey Area Data: Version 9, Dec 31, 2007 „ Gravely Spot oceans Date(s) aerial images were photographed: 6/17/2006 Landfill Streams and Canals The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were A Lava Flow Transportation compiled and digitized probably differs from the background «++ Rails imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting ,,6 Marsh or swamp of map unit boundaries may be evident R Mine or Quarry N Interstate Highways Q Miscellaneous Water - US Routes Q Perennial Water Major Roads v Rock Outcrop N Local Roads } Saline Spot • Sandy Spot a Severely Eroded Spot 0 Sinkhole > Slide or Slip 0 Sodic Spot a Spoil Area [) Stony Spot Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 9114/2009 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3 Soil Map-Franklin County, North Carolina Map Unit Legend Franklin County, North Carolina (NC069) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI ApB Appling loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent 2.7 14.3% slopes DuA Duplin sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent 8.4 45.3% slopes VnB Varina loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent 7.5 40.4% slopes Totals for Area of Interest 18.6 100.0% USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 9/14/2009 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 ' Hydrologic Soil Group-Franklin County, North Carolina a m 35" 53' 26" t ' 35" 53' 11" 0 ' Map Scale: 1:2,250 ( printed an A size (8.5" x 11 ") sheet N Meters 0 20 40 8o 120 Feet 0 50 100 200 300 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey ii= Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey m 35" 53' 26" m 35" 53' 10" 146800 m 9/14/2009 Page 1 of 4 lC C o 0 U L C 0 Z c 0 U S Y C m LL 0 C7 0 N U 0) O O V LO Cr L O LL Z Ca C 0 a o f6 C N O > L 3 C N L M 7 U U U O O CD '0 0 :. (D O O .C C ch a w /) w C O - N U C N ? U E I ` m e 2 I 7 H a o W In N N co N o O U Z f0 0 O Y a cd 3 CL m C j O O L O - N 10 i V E O t o ' O ¢ E U= Z Z t 3 m ql U N q a >. U M p O< > N = 3 C L = O c0 O N C 0 . 0 o N y? o N O.N 3:' E O O Up' C C t G . E? o 0 O O E a m N C °. O L y a ' O Y '` N w y >+ m O g m a c N 3 D 0-0 r 0 > 3 a m E !t-- U f0 f J Z t/1 c L t/1 O L C .N ° ° co N N N r E >„ N N Vl N y O 0 m l O E m y O .Lm 0 C > N >. O t/1 O C p. M j (n . . y, m `o Q t0 ` = 0-0 O a a° Vl N U) 0 p d) (D w CL m ;5 2 t2 Q O_ L N U) CL 10 H o N N m m N 'O U =a o a (D u, > fA N - Z r? 'a N p mo r a E u°)?U FL- LO v)u) o ff $.- o q a m 0 w W J a O ¢ > q c q m «q O lE U r N 6 c a 0 O v Ul '0 c ° q m q 9? q a o q v O Q ° Q 'p q C5 Q a m m U U D N ?O Z q q •_ U q C C13 U O E cc N 0 C .l0 O .q. N p = N a' N d' -ci O C 7 fn C N q A r L C H ~ ° y C q T 1 1 ¢ rn a 3 F`- rnv N O N N 01 0 Z U Z? = o U) = f9 o y a o ?U m c 0 2 0 _U m ? 2 3 C O O a' R d N 7 A O 2 U 1 Hydrologic Soil Group-Franklin County, North Carolina 1 1 1 Hydrologic Soil Group Hydrologic Soil Group- Summary by Map Unit - Franklin County, North Carolina Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in A01 Percent of A01 ApB Appling loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes B 2.7 14.3% DuA Duplin sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes C 8.4 45.3% VnB Varina loamy sand, 2 to 6 percent slopes C 7.5 40.4% Totals for Area of Interest 18.6 100.0% Description Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from long-duration storms. The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and three dual classes (A/D, B/D, and C/D). The groups are defined as follows: Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These ' consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink-swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D, or VD), the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes. USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey a" 9/14!2009 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 4 1 Hydrologic Soil Group-Franklin County, North Carolina Rating Options ' Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified ' Tie-break Rule: Lower 1 F ' USDA Natural Resources :? Web Soil Survey 9/14/2009 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey ' Page 4 of 4 III. EROSION CONTROL CALCULATIONS Sediment Basin Rip-Rap Apron's Ditch Liner's ii C TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN PRE , PROJECT NAME: Pilot Lions Park BY: Tristan Teasley COUNTY: Franklin DATE: 9/9/2009 PROJECT NUMBER: 3043 REV: THE SEDIMENT BAS IN IS DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE N .C. SEDI MENT AND EROSION CONTROL MANUAL, SECTION 6.61 AND SECTION 8.07. DRAINAGE AREA= 11.00 ac. DENUDED AREA- 11.00 ac. PEAK FLOW: Q2 = Cc12A WHERE: 12= , 5,12 in/hr (2yr) Q2 = 32.20 cfs ho= 7.07 In/hr (10yr) 125= 7.94 in/hr (25yr) Q1o = CCI10A A= 0.00 ac. Woods C= 0.25 Q,o = 44.47 cfs A= 0.00 ac. Grass C= 0.30 A= 10.40 ac. BARE SOIL C= 0.55 Q25 = CcltoA A= 0.00 ac. offsite C= 0.55 Q25 = 49.94 cfs A= 0 60 ac Buildg/pavt C= 0 95 A= 11.00 ac. TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA Cc= 0.57 COMPOSITE C RASIN STAr.F/.RTOPAr.F• rnnrn R(`41 F• 1"- 4 ; ELEV. PLANIMETER READING AREA s AVG. AREA s VOL c ACCUM. VOL cf. 326 4510.00 4510 0 0 0 - 327 12686.00 12686 8598 8598 8598 328 25233 00 25233 18960 18960 27558 329 44312.00 44312 34773 34773 62330 330 68834.00 68834 56573 56573 118903 331 96754.00 96754 82794 82794 201697 ' REQUIRED BASIN VOL. (18000A) = 19,800 cf. DETERMINE ELEV. OF SEDIMENT STORAGE ELEV. VOLUME (co BASED ON REQUIRED BASIN VOLUME: 327 8598 X 19800 ' 328 27557.5 REQUIRED SURFACE AREA (435xQlo) = 19,345 Sq.Ft. DETERMINE ELEV. OF SEDIMENT STORAGE: ELEV. AREA (so BASED ON REQUIRED SURFACE AREA: 327 12686 X 19345 328 25233 1 X= 327.59 Z= 1.59 X= 327.53 Z= 1.53 Z= 1.59 DESIGN ELEVATION OF SEDIMENT STORAGE : USE Z= 3.00 RISER DESIGN : DETERMINE HEAD ON RISER FOR VARIOUS SIZE PIPES Hr=[Qp / Cw x 3.14 x (D/12)]23 WHERE: Qp= 44.47 cfs Cw= 3.3 WEIR COEFF. RISER DIA. HEAD (Hr) D= PIPE DIA. (in.) 15 in. 2.28 ft. 18 in. 2.01 ft. 24 in. 1.66 ft. 30 in. 1.43 ft. 36 in. 1.27 ft. 42 in. 1.15 ft. 48 in. 1.05 ft. 54 in. 0.97 ft. NOTE: MAX. HEAD ALLOWED 1 60 in. 0.90 ft. USE 54 in. RISER, Hr= 0.97 ft. Qr= 44.47 cfs 1 RISER(S) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN PRE PROJECT NAME: Pilot Lions Park COUNTY: Franklin PROJECT NUMBER: 3043 BARREL DESIGN: DETERMINE THE REQUIRED BARREL SIZE 0 =CdxAx(2GHb)0.5 BARREL DIA. HEAD (Hb) 15 in. 3.34 ft. 18 in. 3.22 ft. 24 in. 2.97 ft. 30 in. 2.72 ft. 36 in. 2.47 ft. 42 in. 2.22 ft. 48 in. 1.97 ft. USE 36 in. BARREL, 1 BARREL(S) ANTISEEP COLLAR: COLLAR SIZE = BARREL DIA. + 1.5'+ 1.5' = 6 ft. ANTIFLOTATION BLOCK: BASIN DEWATERING BY: Tristan Teasley DATE: 9/9/2009 REV: WHERE: Cd= 0.59 A= PIPE AREA (sf.) Hb= "Z" + "Hr"-DIA./2 DISCHARGE 10.62 cfs 15.01 cfs 25.63 cfs 38.32 cfs 52.58 cfs 67.85 cfs 83.48 cfs Qb= 52.58 cfs VOL. OF DISPLACED WATER= RISER HEIGHT x RISER AREA = Z x 3.14 x (D/2)2 WHERE: Z= 3.00 ft. = 47.71 cf. D= 4.50 ft. WEIGHT OF DISPLACED WATER= VOL x 62.41b/cf = 2977 Ib. WEIGHT OF CONCRETE REQUIRED = 1.1 x 2977 = 3275 lb. REQ'D THICKNESS OF CONC. BLOCK = WT / (LENGTH)(WIDTH)(150 Ib/cf - 62.4 Ib/cf) BLOCK SIZE THICKNESS 5.00 ft. sq. 1.50 ft. 5.50 ft. sq. 1.24 ft. 6.00 ft. sq. 1.04 ft. 6.50 ft. sq. 0.88 ft. 7.00 ft. sq. 0.76 ft. USE 6.50 ft. SQUARE BLOCK, 12 in. THICK Q=cA(2gH)"1 /2 Skimmer Size= 4,0 " Amount of Skimmers= 9 Constant head= 4 " Coefficient= off QD= 0.2425 cfs Z elevation= 329.00 Drawdown time= 71.40 Hrs Drawdown per hour= 0.04 feet 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN PRE PROJECT NAME: Pilot Lions Park BY: Tristan Teasley COUNTY: Franklin DATE: 9/9/2009 PROJECT NUMBER: 3043 REV: EMERGENCY SPILLWAY: DESIGN FLOW: Qe=Q10-Qp Q70= Cc110A WHERE: Cc= 0.57 COMPOSITE C Q10= 44.47 cfs 110 7.07 in/hr (10 YR STORM) A 11.00 ac. Qp= FLOW THRU THE PRINCIPLE STUCTURE RISER CAPACITY= 44.47 cfs BARREL CAP.= 52.58 cfs RISER CONTROLS Qp= 44.47 cfs FLOW TO BE DISCHARGED BY EMERGENCY SPILLWAY Qe= 0.00 cfs SPILLWAY NOT REQUIRED TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN PRE SUMMARY RISER DIA.(IN.) BARREL DIA.(IN.) BARREL SLOPE (%) D (in.) S (ft.) Y (ft,) H (ft.) Z (ft.) L (ft.) STORAGE REQ'D(ct) 54 36 0.50 '- 12 6.50 4.97 3.97 3.00 N \A 19800 1 1 1 1 TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN Post' PROJECT NAME: Pilot Lions Park BY: Tristan Teasley COUNTY: Franklin DATE: 9/9/2009 PROJECT NUMBER: 3043 REV: THE SEDIMENT BAS IN IS DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE N .C. SEDI MENT AND EROSION CONTROL MANUAL, SECTION 6.61 AND SECTION 8.07. DRAINAGE AREA= 11.43 ac. DENUDED AREA- 11.43 ac. PEAK FLOW: Q2 = Cc12A WHERE: 12= 5.12 in/hr (2yr) Q2 = 33.42 cfs ho= 7.07 In/hr (10yr) 125= 7.94 in/hr (25yr) Qio = CCI10A A= 0.00 ac. Woods C= 0.25 Q,o= 46.14 cfs A= ' 0.00 ac. Grass C= 0.30 A= 10.83 ac. BARE SOIL C= 0.55 025= CCI10A A= ' 0.00 ac. offsite C= 0.55 Q25 = 51.82 cfs A= 0.60 ac. Buildg/paVt C= 0.95 A= 11.43 ac. TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA Cc= 0.57 COMPOSITE C BASIN STAGE/ STORAGE: DWG_ SCAT P 1"= '1 /NnTP MAY Gil I PPlnuT= 95'l ELEV. PLANIMETER READING AREA s AVG. AREA s VOL c ACCUM. VOL cf. 326 5229.00 5229 0 0 0 327 17698.00 17698 11464 11464 11464 328 19332.00 19332 18515 18515 29979 329 21023.00 21023 20178 20178 50156 330 22771.00 ' 22771 21897 21897 72053 331 21575 00 24575 23673 23673 95726 1 REQUIRED BASIN VOL. (1800xDA) = 20,574 cf. DETERMINE ELEV. OF SEDIMENT STORAGE ELEV. VOLUME (cf) BASED ON REQUIRED BASIN VOLUME: 327 11463.5 X 20574 ' 328 29978.5 REQUIRED SURFACE AREA (435xQio) = 20,072 Sq.Ft. DETERMINE ELEV. OF SEDIMENT STORAGE: ELEV. AREA (so ' BASED ON REQUIRED SURFACE AREA: 328 19332 X 20072 329 21023 X= 327.49 Z= 1.49 X= 328.44 Z= 2.44 Z= 2.44 DESIGN ELEVATION OF SEDIMENT STORAGE : USE Z= 3.00 RISER DESIGN: DETERMINE HEAD ON RISER FOR VARIOUS SIZE PIPES Hr=[Qp / Cw x 3.14 x (D/12)]2" WHERE: Qp= 46.14 cfs Cw= 3.3 WEIR COEFF. RISER DIA. HEAD (Hr) D= PIPE DIA. (in.) 15 in. 2.33 ft. 18 in. 2.06 ft. 24 in. 1.70 ft. 30 in. 1.47 ft. 36 in. 1.30 ft. 42 in. 1.17 ft. 48 in. 1.07 ft. 54 in. 0.99 ft. NOTE: MAX. HEAD ALLOWED 1 60 in. 0.93 ft. USE 54 in. RISER, Hr= 0.99 ft. Or= 46.14 cfs 1 RISER(S) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN Post PROJECT NAME: Pilot Lions Park COUNTY: Franklin PROJECT NUMBER: 3043 BARREL DESIGN: DETERMINE THE REQUIRED BARREL SIZE Q = Cd x A x (2GHb) 0.5 BARREL DIA. HEAD (Hb) 15 in. 3.37 ft. 18 in. 3.24 ft. 24 in. 2.99 ft. 30 in. 2.74 ft. 36 in. 2.49 ft. 42 in. 2.24 ft. 48 in. 1.99 ft. USE 36 in. BARREL, 1, BARREL(S) ANTISEEP COLLAR: COLLAR SIZE = BARREL DIA. + 1.5'+ 1.5' = 6 ft. ANTIFLOTATION BLOCK: BY: Tristan Teasley DATE: 9/9/2009 REV: WHERE: Cd= 0.59 A= PIPE AREA (sf.) Hb= "Z" + "Ht"-DIA./2 DISCHARGE 10.66 cfs 15.07 cfs 25.73 cfs 38.49 cfs 52.84 cfs 68.22 cfs 83.99 cfs Qb= 52.84 cfs VOL. OF DISPLACED WATER= RISER HEIGHT x RISER AREA = Z x 3.14 x (D/2)2 WHERE: Z= 3.00 ft. = 47.71 cf. D= 4.50 ft. WEIGHT OF DISPLACED WATER= VOL x 62.4 lb/cf = 2977 lb. WEIGHT OF CONCRETE REQUIRED = 1.1 x 2977 = 3275 lb. REQ'D THICKNESS OF CONC. BLOCK = WT / (LENGTH)(WIDTH)(150 Ib/cf - 62.41b/cf) BLOCK SIZE THICKNESS 5.00 ft. sq. 1.50 ft. 5.50 ft. sq. 1.24 ft. 6.00 ft. sq. 1.04 ft. 6.50 ft. sq. 0.88 ft. 7.00 ft. sq. 0.76 ft. USE 6.50 ft. SQUARE BLOCK, 12 in. THICK BASIN DEWATERING: Q=cA(29H)11 /2 Skimmer Size= 4;0 " Amount of Skimmers= 1 Constant head= 4 " Coefficient= 0:6 Qo= 0.2425 cfs Z elevation= 329.00 Drawdown time= 57.45 Hrs Drawdown per hour= 0.05 feet ' TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN Post ' PROJECT NAME: Pilot Lions Park BY: Tristan Teasley COUNTY: Franklin DATE: 9/9/2009 PROJECT NUMBER: 3043 ' REV: EMERGENCY SPILLWAY: DESIGN FLOW: Qe=010-Qp Q10= Cc110A WHERE: Cc= 0.57 COMPOSITE C Q10= 46.14 cfs 110= 7.07 in/hr (10 YR STORM) A= 11.43 ac. Qp= FLOW THRU THE PRINCIPLE STUCTURE RISER CAPACITY= 46.14 cfs ' BARREL CAP.= 52.84 cfs RISER CONTROLS Qp= 46.14 cfs FLOW TO BE DISCHARGED BY EMERGENCY SPILLWAY ' Qe= 0.00 cfs SPILLWAY NOT REQUIRED 1 1 1 TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN Post SUMMARY 14 RISER DIA. (IN.) BARREL DIA.(IN.) BARREL SLOPE(%) D (in.) S (ft.) Y (ft,) H (ft.) Z (ft.) L (ft.) STORAGE REQ'D (cf.) 54 36 0,W:;:: 12 6.50 4.99 3.99 3.00 NIA 20574 1 1 1 RIP RAP OUTLET PROTECTION PROJECT NAME: Pilot Lions BY: TMT PROJECT NUMBER: 3043 DATE: 8-Sep-09 REV: DESIGN OF RIP RAP OUTLET PROTECTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE N.C. SEDIMENT & EROSION CONTROL MANUAL. ASSUME TAILWATER DEPTH < 0.5 Do RIP RAP GRADATION PER NCDOT SPECIFICATIONS RIP RAP MINIMUM MIDRANGE MAXIMUM CLASS (IN) (IN) (IN) A 2 4 6 B 5 8 12 1 5 10 17 2 9 14 23 EW # 2 - USE CLASS B RIP RAP DISCHARGE (Q)= 4.59 cfs d5o= 8 in. PIPE DIA. (Do)= 1.50 ft. dM,x= 12 in. FROM FIGURE 8.06A LENGTH (La)= 10.0 ft. APRON THICKNESS= 1.5 x dMax WIDTH W=Do + La= 1.50 + 10.0 = 11.50 ft. APRON THICKNESS= 18.0 in. d5o= 0.50 ft. = 6.00 in Velocity= 4.42 ft/sec. MIN. HEIGHT OF RIP RAP @ PIPE OPENING (H) = 2/3 x PIPE DIA.= 12 in SIDE SLOPE OF RIP RAP APRON (M)= 3 HAV FES # DISCHARGE (Q)= PIPE DIA. (Do)= LENGTH (La)= WIDTH W=Do + La= dso= 7 12.41 cfs 2.00 ft. FROM FIGURE 8.06A 13.0 ft. 2.00 + 13.0 = 0.50 ft. = 6.00 in USE CLASS B RIP RAP dso= 8 in. dmAx= 12 in. APRON THICKNESS= 1.5 x dMAx 15.00 ft. APRON THICKNESS= 18.0 in. Velocity= 5.63 ft/sec. MIN. HEIGHT OF RIP RAP @ PIPE OPENING (H) = 2/3 x PIPE DIA.= 16 in SIDE SLOPE OF RIP RAP APRON (M)= 3 HAV FES# 13 USE CLASS B RIP RAP DISCHARGE (Q)= 2.34 cfs dso= 8 in. PIPE DIA. (Do)= 1.25 ft. dmAx= 12 in. FROM FIGURE 8.06A LENGTH (La)= 10.0 ft. APRON THICKNESS= 1.5 x dM„x WIDTH W=Do + La= 1.25 + 1o.o = 11.25 ft. APRON THICKNESS= 18.0 in. d5o= 0.50 ft. = 6.00 in Velocity= 4.91 ft/sec. MIN. HEIGHT OF RIP RAP @ PIPE OPENING (H) = 2/3 x PIPE DIA.= 10 in SIDE SLOPE OF RIP RAP APRON (M)= 3 HAV Page 1 of 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 SUMMARY OF RESULTS RIP RAP APRON SCHEDULE FES/ EW D IN RIP RAP CLASS W IN L FT H IN M 2 18.0 B 11.50 10.00 12.00 3 7 18.0 B 15.00 13.00 16.00 3 13 18.0 B 11.25 10.00 10.00 3 3 0 Outlet W Do '+ La pipe I diameter (Do) L a -- +t T i water < 0.5Do p\ Pp 60 ? r?ir f so 1 ` 20 10 90 30 2 Q a 0 1 ? 0 3 5 10 20 50 100 200 500 1000 Discharge (0/sec) Curves may not be extrapolated. Figure 8.06a Design of outlet protection protection from a round pipe flowing full, minimum tailwaler condition (7w a 0.5 diameter). Page 2 of 2 ' North American Green • ECMDS Version 4.3 9710/2009 11:11 AM COMPUTED BY:. TMT PROJECT NAME: Pilot Lions Park IPROJECTNO.: 3043 STATION/REACH: Swale #1A TOSTATION/REACH: SwaleltlA DRAINAGEAREA 0.56Aa ESIGNFREQUENCY: 10Yr. HYDRAULIC RESULTS Dischnge Peak Fbw ebdty [fps Area (salt) HydraJic Normal S75 [n=0055) 23 Period hrs Rad ft De ' 3 12.0 1.59 1.45 0.3 30 0.4It 2 44 S-0.0170 ' 101 Bottom 3.0 Width=2.0011 1 LINER RESULTS Nd to Scale 1 71 L 1 1 Reach Malting Type tability Analyss Vegetation Characteristics Pnmissble Cakvlated Safety Fact. Remarks Staple Patten Phase Class Type Density Shear Sum Ws0 Shen Stress (psi) Straight S75 Unrv getated 1.55 0.46 3.35 STABLE Staple D Back to IrprA:Saeen:. **************************************************************************** IRTH AMERICAN GREEN EROSION CONTROL MATERIALS DESIGN SOFTWARE VERSION 4.3 NORTH AMERICAN GREEN CHANNEL PROTECTION - ENGLISH/S.I. ER SPECIFIED CHANNEL LINING BACK-UP COMPUTATIONS *************************************************************************** t OJECT NAME: Pilot Lions Park PROJECT NO.: 3043 MPUTED BY: TMT DATE: 9/10/2009 FROM STATION/REACH: Swale #lA TO STATION/REACH: Swale #lA INAGE AREA: 0.56 Ac. DESIGN FREQUENCY: 10 Yr. **************************************************************************** INPUT PARAMETERS *************************************************************************** Channel Discharge 2.3 cfs (.07 m'3/s) t ak Flow Period 12 hours annel Slope 0.017 ft/ft (0.017 m/m) Channel Bottom Width 2.0 ft (.61 m) ft Side Slope 3:1 ght Side Slope 3:1 Channel Lining : S75 Staple D rmi. Shear(Tp) :1.55 psf (74.2 Pa) Phase = 0 *************************************************************************** CALCULATIONS ***************************************************************************** itial Depth Estimate = 0.16 * (2.3 /(0.017A0.5))A0.375 nal Channel Depth (after 7 iterations) Flow Area = (2.0 * 0.4)+(0.5 *0.44A2 * (3.0+3.0)) t t Per. =2.0 +(0.4* (((3.OA2)+,)A .5 +((3.OA2)+1) A.5) ) draulic Radius = (1.4 / 4.8) Channel Velocity =(1.486/0.055)*(0.3A0.667)*(0.017A.5) Cannel Effective Manning's Roughness Calculated Shear (Td) = 62.4 * 0.44 * 0.017 t fety Factor = (Tp/Td) = (1.55 /0.46) 1 1 = 0.47 ft (.14 m) = .44 ft (0.13 m) = 1.4 sq. ft (0.1 m""2) = 4.8 ft (1.5 m) = 0.3 ft (0.1 m) = 1.6 fps (0.5 m/s) = 0.055 = 0.46 psf (22.2 Pa) = 3.35 1 North American Green -ENDS Version 43 0/10/2009 11:12AMC0MPUTEDBY: TMT W ' PROJECT NAME: Pilot Lion: Park PROJECT NO.: 3043 IFROM.STATION/REACH: Swale111B OSTATION/REACH: SWale#IB DRAINAGEAREA N/A ESIGNFREOUENCY: Mr. HYDRAULIC RESULTS Discharge Peak Flow Velocity Ups Area(sglt) Hydraulic Normal S75 (n-0.0,42) 'Ell Period (Ns) Radus(It) Deothlltl 0012 120 1.84 5.54 0.63 1.07 ' S -0.0050 Bottom JI 1 L Vldt W ZOO it 3.0 1 LINER RESULTS Not to Scale 1 Reach Mattirg Type tabiftyAnalysis Vegetation Characteristics Peramble Caim"led Safety Factor Remarks Staple Pattern Phase pass Type Density -Stress (ps1) Shear Stress (psf) Straght S75 Unwgetated 1.55 633 4.66 STABLE Staple D B adc Iolnpul Saecn **************************************************************************** IRTH AMERICAN GREEN EROSION CONTROL MATERIALS DESIGN SOFTWARE VERSION 4.3 NORTH AMERICAN GREEN CHANNEL PROTECTION - ENGLISH/S.I. ER SPECIFIED CHANNEL LINING BACK-UP COMPUTATIONS OJECT NAME: Pilot Lions Park PROJECT NO.: 3043 MPUTED BY: TMT DATE: 9/10/2009 FROM STATION/REACH: Swale #1B TO STATION/REACH: Swale #1B 1INAGE AREA: N/A DESIGN FREQUENCY: 10 Yr. ***************************************************************************** INPUT PARAMETERS *************************************************************************** Channel Discharge ak Flow Period annel Slope Channel Bottom Width ft Side Slope ght Side Slope : 10.2 cfs (.29 mA3/s) : 12 hours : 0.005 ft/ft : 2.0 ft (.61 . 3:1 . 3.1 (0.005 m/m) m) i annel Lining : S75 Staple D rmi. Shear(Tp) :1.55 psf (74.2 Pa) Phase = 0 *************************************************************************** CALCULATIONS ***************************************************************************** litial Depth Estimate = 0.16 * (10.2 /(0.005A0.5))A0.375 = nal Channel Depth (after 7 iterations) Flow Area = (2.0 * 1.1)+(0.5 *1.07A2 * (3.0+3.0)) 3 t Per. =2.0 +(1.1* (((3.0A2)+1) A.5 +((3.0"2)+1)'.5)) draulic Radius = (5.5 / 8.7) Channel Velocity =(1.486/0.042)*(0.6A0.667)*(0.005A.5) Cannel Effective Manning's Roughness Calculated Shear (Td) = 62.4 * 1.07 * 0.005 I fety Factor = (Tp/Td) = (1.55 /0.33) u 1.03 ft (.31 m) 1.07 ft (0.33 m) 5.5 sq.ft (0.5 mA2) 8.7 ft (2.7 m) 0.6 ft (0.2 m) 1.8 fps (0.6 m/s) = 0.042 = 0.33 psf (15.9 Pa) = 4.66 1 WDrlhAmericanGreen-ECMDSVersion4.3 _ 9/10/2009 11:13AMiC0MPUTEDBY: TMT. PROJECT NAME: Pilot Lions Perk fPROJECT NO.: 3043 ' FROMSTATION/REACH; $wale#1C OSTATION/REACH: SwWe C DRAINAGEAREA: N/A ESIGNFREQUENCY: 10Yr. HYDRAULIC RESULTS Discharge Peak Flow Velocity (fps) Area (a41t) Hydraulic Normal 575 (n-0.036) _ cfs Period ks Radu:LltJ Deothlltl 25.4 12.0 3.23 7.07 0.76 1.32 S- 0.0090 tom 'width-2.00If, 1 LINER RESULTS Not to Scale L Reach Matting Type Stahiky Analysis Vegetation Characteristics Permissible Calculated Safety Factor Remarks Staple Pattern Phase Class Type Density Shear Sties (PSI) Shem Stress 10) Straight S75 Unvegetated 1.55 0.74 209 STABLE Staple D Back to Irpu: Screen **************************************************************************** IRTH AMERICAN GREEN EROSION CONTROL MATERIALS DESIGN SOFTWARE VERSION 4.3 NORTH AMERICAN GREEN CHANNEL PROTECTION - ENGLISH/S.I. ER SPECIFIED CHANNEL LINING BACK-UP COMPUTATIONS *************************************************************************** OJECT NAME: Pilot Lions Park PROJECT NO.: 3043 MPUTED BY: TMT DATE: 9/10/2009 FROM STATION/REACH: Swale #1C TO STATION/REACH: Swale #1C 11A INAGE AREA: N/A DESIGN FREQUENCY: 10 Yr. ***************************************************************************** INPUT PARAMETERS *************************************************************************** Channel Discharge ak Flow Period annel Slope Channel Bottom Width ft Side Slope ght Side Slope . 25.4 cfs (. : 12 hours : 0.009 ft/ft : 2.0 ft (.61 3:1 3.1 72 mA3/s) (0.009 m/m) m) annel Lining : S75 Staple D rmi. Shear(Tp) :1.55 psf (74.2 Pa) Phase = 0 *************************************************************************** CALCULATIONS ***************************************************************************** itial Depth Estimate = 0.16 * (25.4 /(0.0090.5) nal Channel Depth (after 7 iterations) Flow Area = (2.0 * 1.3)+(0.5 *1.32A2 * (3.0+3.0)) A0 .375 = 1.30 ft (.40 1.32 ft (0 40 t Per. =2.0 +(1.3*(((3.0 2)+1) .5 +((3.0"2)+1)A.5)) draulic Radius = (7.9 / 10.4) Channel Velocity =(1.486/0.036)*(0.8"0.667)*(0.009"'.5) lannel Effective Manning's Roughness Calculated Shear (Td) = 62.4 * 1.32 * 0.009 1fety Factor = (Tp/Td) _ (1.55 /0.74) 1 = 7.9 = 10.4 = 0.8 = 3.2 sq. ft (0. m) m) 7 mA2) ft (3.2 m) ft (0.2 m) fps (1.0 m/s) 0.036 0.74 psf (35.5 Pa) 2.09 11 1 I orth.American Green - ECMDS Version 4.3 5/10.'2009 11:14AM COMPUTED BY THT DJECT NAME: Pict Lions Park PROJECT NO.: 3043 ROM STATIONIREACH: Swale 4Z 11 O STAIIONMEACH;. Swale #2 DRAINAGE AREA: 5.30Aa ESIGN FREQUEO -. 10yr, HYDRAULIC RESULTS Discharge cfs Peak Fl ow Periodlhrs] r" locity(fps) Area(sp.fl] H:Y& 6c adiuslRl Normal Deoth(ftl U 12.0 283 3.29 0.48 0.77 S75 In-0.0491 S-0.0230 1 •Widtht-Z00ft 1 Not to Scale Reach Matting Type Stabiky Analysis Vegetation Characteristics Per missbb Calculated Safely Fedor Remarks Staple Pattern Phase Class Type Densely She ar Stress tW Shears Stress (ps0 Straight S75 Unwsgataled 1.55 1.10 1.41 STABLE Staple D Back to Input Screen **************************************************************************** IRTH AMERICAN GREEN EROSION CONTROL MATERIALS DESIGN SOFTWARE VERSION 4.3 NORTH AMERICAN GREEN CHANNEL PROTECTION - ENGLISH/S.I. ER SPECIFIED CHANNEL LINING BACK-UP COMPUTATIONS *************************************************************************** OJECT NAME: Pilot Lions Park PROJECT NO.: 3043 MPUTED BY: TMT DATE: 9/10/2009 FROM STATION/REACH: Swale #2 TO STATION/REACH: Swale #2 JAINAGE AREA: 5.30 Ac. DESIGN FREQUENCY: 10 Yr. *************************************************************************** INPUT PARAMETERS Channel Discharge ak Flow Period annel Slope Channel Bottom Width ft Side Slope ght Side Slope 9.3 cfs 12 hours 0.023 ft/ft 2.0 ft (.61 . 3:1 3.1 26 mA3/s) (0.023 m/m) m) Channel Lining : S75 Staple D rmi. Shear(Tp) :1.55 psf (74.2 Pa) Phase = 0 CALCULATIONS ***************************************************************************** itial Depth Estimate = 0.16 * (9.3 /(0.023A0.5))A0.375 = 0.75 ft (.23 m) nal Channel Depth (after 6 iterations) = .77 ft (0.23 m) Flow Area = (2.0 * 0.8)+(0.5 *0.77A2 * (3.0+3.0)) = 3.3 sq.ft (0.3 mA2 ttraulic Per. =2.0 +(0.8*(((3OA2)+l)A.5 +((3OA2)+1)".5)) = 6.8 ft (2.1 m) Radius = (3.3 / 6.8) = 0.5 ft (0.1 m) Channel velocity =(1.486/0.049)*(0.5A0.667)*(0.023A.5) = 2.8 fps (0.9 m/s) 1 annel Effective Manning's Roughness = 0.049 alculated Shear (Td) = 62.4 * 0.77 * 0.023 = 1.10 psf (52.6 Pa) fety Factor = (Tp/Td) = (1.55 /1.10) = 1.41 1 Li 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 HYDRAULIC RESUM Discharge Peak Flow Velocity (fps Area (&41t) Hydraulic Namal cfs Periodfhrsl RaduslFtl Depthfltl 228 I 12.0 I 3.16 I 7.22 - 0.66 0.93 LINER RESULTS 975(n-0? S--0.0160 1Ln 1 Bott0?I J Width m()ft' 30 Not to Scale Reach Matting ?;f tabiky Anal ysis Vegalation Charaderistics Cau afely Factor Remarks Staple P Phase Class Type Density Shear Suess (psf) Shear Stress (Psf) Straight S75 Unvegetated 1.53 093 1.67 STABLE Staple D Beck to lrpW Screen I **************************************************************************** IRTH AMERICAN GREEN EROSION CONTROL MATERIALS DESIGN SOFTWARE VERSION 4.3 NORTH AMERICAN GREEN CHANNEL PROTECTION - ENGLISH/S.I. ER SPECIFIED CHANNEL LINING BACK-UP COMPUTATIONS *************************************************************************** OJECT NAME: Pilot Lions Park PROJECT NO.: 3043 MPUTED BY: TMT DATE: 9/10/2009 FROM STATION/REACH: Swale #3 TO STATION/REACH: Swale ##3 JAINAGE AREA: N/A DESIGN FREQUENCY: 10 Yr. ************************* ************************************************* INPUT PARAMETERS *************************************************************************** Channel Discharge 22.8 cfs (.65 m"3/s) ak Flow Period 12 hours annel Slope 0.016 ft/ft (0.016 m/m) Channel Bottom Width : 5.0 ft (1.52 m) ft Side Slope : 3:1 ght Side Slope : 3:1 Channel Lining : S75 Staple D rmi. Shear(Tp) :1.55 psf (74.2 Pa) Phase = 0 *************************************************************************** CALCULATIONS ***************************************************************************** itial Depth Estimate = 0.16 * (22.8 /(0.016A0.5))A0.375 = nal Channel Depth (after 10 iterations) _ Flow Area = (5.0 * 0.9)+(0.5 *0.93A2 * (3.0+3.0)) _ f t Per. =5.0 +(0.9* (((3.0A2)+1) A.5 +((3.0"2)+1)".5)) draulic Radius = (7.2 / 10.9) Channel Velocity =(1.486/0.045)*(0.7AO.667)*(0.016A.5) fa annel Effective Manning's Roughness lculated Shear (Td) = 62.4 * 0.93 * 0.016 t fety Factor = (Tp/Td) = (1.55 /0.93) 1 1.12 ft (.34 m) .93 ft (0.28 m) 7.2 sq.ft (0.7 mA2) 10.9 ft (3.3 m) 0.7 ft (0.2 m) 3.2 fps (1.0 m/s) = 0.045 = 0.93 psf (44.3 Pa) = 1.67 1 1 1 ' IV. STORM DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS NOAH Storm Data ' Haestad Storm Tabulation Composite C-Values Time of Concentration Calculations Storm Schedule StormCad Output Data ' Swale Flow Calculations Grass Swale Supplement Form ' Culvert Calculations 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i POINT PRECIPITATION` FREQUENCY ESTIMATES FROM NOAH ATLAS 14 "*??., .0 North Carolina 35.89861111 N 78.286667 W 295 feet from "Precipitation-Frequency Atlas of the United States" NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 2, Version 3 G.M. Bonnin, D. Martin, B. Lin, T. Parzybok, M.Yekta, and D. Riley NOAH, National Weather Service, Silver Spring Maryland, 2004 Fw.n.a.d T6„ rid 010n() Con fidenc e Limi ts Se ? asonal i Location Ma s s. Other Info. GI S data M aps Docs. R eturn to State Map Pr ecipitation Inte nsity Estimates ( in/hr ARI* 5 min 10 15 30 60 120 3 hr 6 hr 12 24 48 4 [ 7 rE1 d FT] d 30 45 d co d (years) min min min min min hr hr hr dsy day - .-y 11 ay ?a ay_ 4:84 3.86 3.22 2.21 1.38 0.80 0.57 0.34 0.20 0.12 0.07 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 5.57 4.46 3.74 2.58 1.62 0.95 0.67 0.40 0.24 0.14 0.08 0.05 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 5 6.30 5.04 4.25 3.02 1.94 1.15 0.81 0.49 0.29 0.18 0.10 0.06 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 10 7.15 5.72 4.82 3.49 2.27 1.37 0.98 0.59 0.35 0.21 0. ] 2 0.07 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 25 7.98 6.36 5.37 3.98 2.65 1.62 1.17 0.71 0.42 0.26 0.15 0.08 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 50 8.68 6.91 5.84 4.39 2.98 1.86 1.35 0.82 0.49 0.29 0.17 0.09 0.06 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 100 9.30 7.39 6.23 4.77 3.29 2.08 1.53 0.93 0.56 0.33 0.19 0.10 0.06 0.05 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 2o0 9.88 7.83 6.58 5.13 3.59 2.32 1.72 1.06 0.64 0.37 0.21 0.11 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 500 10.5 ] 8.31 6.98 5.55 3.98 2.63 1.98 1.22 0.75 0.43 0.24 0.13 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.02 1000 11.12 8.77 7.33 5.94 4.33 2.92 2.23 1.38 0.86 0.48 0.27 0.14 0.09 0.07 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.02 * These precipitation frequency estimates are based on a partial duration series. ARI is the Average Recurrence Interval. Please refer to NOAA Atlas 14 Document for more information. NOTE: Formatting forces estimates near zero to appear as zero. * Upper bound of the 90% confidence interval Precipitation Intensity Estimates (in/hr) A(yRI** 10 15 30 60 120 3 6 12 24 48 4 7 10 20 30 45 60 ears) F-5, n min min minmin min hr Thr hr 11 hr 11 hr day day day day day 11 day day 5.30 4.24 3.53 2.42 1.51 0.89 0.63 0.38 0.22 0.13 0.07 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 6.10 4.87 4.08 2.82 1.77 1.04 0.74 0.45 0.26 0.15 0.09 0.05 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 6.88 5.51 4.65 3.30 2.12 1.26 0.90 0.54 0.32 0.20 0.11 0.06 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 10 7.82 6.25 5.28 3.82 2.49 1.50 1.08 0.65 0.38 0.23 0.13 0.07 0.05 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 25 8.71 6.95 5.87 4.35 2.89 1.78 1.29 0.78 0.46 0.28 0.16 0.09 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 50 9.48 7.55 6.38 4.80 3.25 2.03 1.49 0.90 0.54 0.32 0.18 0.10 0.06 0.05 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 100 10.16 8.07 6.80 5.21 3.59 2.28 1.68 1.02 0.61 0.36 0.20 0.11 0.07 0.05 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 200 10.80 8.56 7.20 5.60 3.93 2.54 1.89 1.15 0.70 0.40 0.23 0.12 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.02 500 11.51 9.10 7.64 6.08 4.36 2.88 2.18 ].34 0.82 0.47 0.26 0.14 0.09 0.06 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.02 1000 12.22 9.62 8.05 6.52 4.76 3.21 2.46 1.51 0.93 0.53 0.29 0.15 0.10 0.07 0.04 0.03 0.03 0.02 - i ne upper Douna or me connoence mtervar at wit connoence ievei is me value wnicn o70 or me simwam quanuie values ror a given uequeiay me greawr war. " These precipitation frequency estimates are based on a partial duration series. ARI is the Average Recurrence Interval. Please refer to NOAA Atlas 14 Document for more information. NOTE: Formatting prevents estimates near zero to appear as zero. * Lower bound of the 90% confidence interval Precipitation Intensity Estimates (in/hr) ARI** 5 10 15 30 60 120 3 IF 12 48 4 7 10 20 30 45 60 in min min hr hr 11 hr 11 hr day day day 11 day 11 day 11 day 11 day 1? 4.42 3.52 2.94 2.01 1.25 0.73 0.51 0.31 0.18 0.1 I 0.06 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0 5.10 4.08 3.42 2.36 1.48 0.86 0.61 0.37 0.22 0.13 0.08 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 F-5 -1 5.76 4.61 3.89 2.76 1.77 1.04 0.74 0.45 0.26 0.17 0.10 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 10 6.53 5.22 4.40 3.19 2.08 1.24 0.89 0.53 0.32 0.20 0.11 0.06 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.01 25 7.25 5.78 4.88 3.62 2.41 1.46 1.05 0.64 0.38 0.24 0.13 0.07 0.05 0.04 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.01 50 7.85 6.25 5.28 3.97 2.69 1.67 1.21 0.74 0.44 0.27 0.15 0.08 0.05 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.01 100 8.36 6.65 5.60 4.29 2.95 1.86 1.36 0.83 0.50 0.30 0.17 0.09 0.06 0.05 0.03 0.02 0.02 0.02 200 8.83 7.00 -1 5.88 4.58 3.21 2.05 1.52 0.93 0.56 0.34 0.19 0.10 0.07 0.05 0.03 -Q 0.02 1 0.02 -1 0.02 500 9.32 7.37 6. ] 8 4.92 3.53 2.31 1.72 1.06 0.65 0.39 0.22 0.12 0.07 0.06 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.02 1000 9.78 7.70 6.44 5.22 3.81 2.54 1.92 ].18 0.73 0.43 0.24 0.13 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.02 ` I ne lower hound of the connoence interval at 9111%conndence level is the value wmcn 5% of the simulated quanble values tor a given tequency are JOBS titan. POINT PRECIPITATION FREQUENCY ESTIMATES FROM NOAA ATLAS 14 `,y* T?,?° North Carolina 35.89861111 N 78.286667 W 295 feet from 'Precipitation-Frequency Atlas of the United States" NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 2, Version 3 G.M. Bonin, D. Martin, B. Lin, T. Parzybok, M.Yekta, and D. Riley NOAA, National Weather Service, Silver Spring, Maryland, 2004 Extracted: Thu Jul 9 2009 Confidence Limits Seasonality Location Maps Other Info. GIS data Maps Docs Retum to State Map Precipitation Frequency Estimates (inches) ARI*) ? i mm [g 3 Q-' n l 60 min 120 min H FIr Ed H k?q ? 4 da qd Fi 1 20 d 30 45 60 TI a d aX d aX d =1 0.40 0.64 0.80 1.10 1.38 1.61 1.70 2.04 2.41 2.84 3.29 3.70 4.30 4.90 6.59 8.18 10.40 12.48 0 0.46 0.74 0.93 1.29 1.62 1.90 2.01 2.42 2.85 3.44 3.97 4.45 5.14 5.84 7.80 9.64 12.21 14.61 0 0.53 0.84 1.06 1.51 1.94 2.30 2.45 2.94 3.48 4.36 5.00 5.54 6.33 7.09 9.31 11.32 14.11 16.70 10 0.60 0.95 1.21 1.75 2.27 2.74 F294 ! 4 .20 5.11 5.83 6.42 7.29 8.09 10.51 12.64 15.59 18.30 25 0.67 1.06 1.34 1.99 2.65 3.25 3.51 4.24 5.08 6.17 7.00 7.65 8.62 9.45 12.15 14.40 17.54 20.40 50 0.72 1.15 1.46 2.20 2.98 3.72 4.06 4.92 5.93 7.04 7.96 8.66 9.69 10.54 13.46 15.77 19.04 22.00 100 0.78 1.23 1.56 2.39 3.29 4.17 4.60 5.59 6.79 7.97 8.98 9.71 10.81 11.66 14.80 17.14 20.52 23.54 200 0.82 1.30 1.65 2.56 3.59 4.64 5.17 6.32 7.74 8.97 10.06 10.83 11.99 12.83 16.17 18.53 22.00 25.08 500 0.88 1.39 1.74 2.77 3.98 5.26 5.95 7.31 9.04 10.41 11.62 12.41 13.64 14.45 ] 8.06 20.40 23.96 27.08 1000 0.93 1.46 1.83 2.97 4.33 5.85 6.69 8.27 10.31 11.60 12.89 13.70 14.97 15.74 19.55 21.84 25.46 28.58 - l nese precipitation frequency estimates are based on a partial duration series. ARI is the Average Recurrence Interval. Please refer to NOAA Atlas 14 Document for more information. NOTE: Formatting forces estimates near zero to appear as zero. * Upper bound of the 90% confidence in Precipitation Frequency Estimates (inc ARI 5n 10 15 W3? 60 120 3 F6j 12 4 48 F (years) mi min min min min hr hr 11 hr 11 hr a y terval hes) 7 10 20 30 45 60 day day day 11 day 11 day 11 day 0.44 0.71 0.88 1.21 1.51 1.78 1.89 2.26 2.65 3.06 3.54 3.96 4.59 5.22 7.00 8.66 10.96 13.12 727 0.51 0.81 1.02 1.41 1.77 2.08 2.231 F2 .67 3.13 3.71 4.28 4.76 5.50 6.23 8.29 10.22 12.88 15.35 0.57 0.92 1.16 1.65 2.12 2.52 2.71 3.24 3.82 4.70 5.38 5.92 6.76 7.55 9.88 11.99 14.88 17.54 YO 0.65 1.04 1.32 1.91 2.49 3.00 3.24 3.88 4.61 5.51 6.28 6.86 7.78 8.60 11.16 13.39 16.44 19.24 25 0.73 1.16 1.47 2.17 2.89 3.55 3.87 4.65 5.56 6.65 7.54 8.18 9.21 10.06 12.90 15.26 18.50 21.46 ® 0.79 1.26 1.59 2.40 3.25 4.07 4.46 5.39 6.47 7.59 8.57 9.27 10.36 11.23 14.31 16.71 20.09 23.15 100 0.85 1.34 1.70 2.60 3.59 4.56 5.05 6.12 7.40 8.60 9.68 10.42 11.58 12.45 15.74 18.19 21.69 24.82 200 0.90 1.43 1.80 2.80 3.93 5.08 5.68 6.91 8.42 9.69 10.87 11.64 12.87 13.72 -1 17.24 19.70 -1 23.29 26.47 500 0.96 1.52 1.91 3.04 4.36 5.76 6.54 8.00 9.84 11.28 12.61 13.38 14.70 15.51 1932 . 21.75 25.45 28.67 1000 1.02 1.60 2.01 3.26 4.76 6.42 7.38 9.07 11.24 12.60 14.04 14.81 16.18 16.94 20.98 23.35 27.10 30.32 I ne upper fauna or me conndence intervai at `JRM cofmaerce level is Ina value wnicn !)% or the simulated quanble values for a given frequency are greaterman. These precipitation frequency estimates are based on a partial durabon series. ARI is the Average Recurrence Interval. Please refer to NOAA Atlas 14 Document for more information. NOTE: Formatting prevents estimates near zero to appear as zero. * Lower bound of the 90% confidence interval Precipitation Frequency Estimates (inches) ARI** 5 10 15 Z3? 60 120 TFI 12 24 4 T -1 8 4 7 10 20 30 45 60 11 11 11 11 (years) min min min min hr hr hr day day day day day day day 0.37 0.59 0.73 1.01 1.25 1.46 1.54 1.86 2.20 2.64 3.07 3.46 4.02 4.60 6.20 7.73 9.88 11.88 0.42 0.68 0.85 1.18 1.48 1.73 1.83 2.20 2.61 3.20 3.70 4.15 4.81 5.48 7.35 9.12 11.60 13.90 0.48 0.77 0.97 1.38 1.77 2.09 2.22 2.67 3.17 4.05 4.65 5.17 5.92 6.65 8.76 10.69 13.39 15.86 10 0.54 0.87 1.10 1.59 2.08 2.48 2.66 3.20 3.82 4.73 5.41 5.98 6.80 7.57 9.87 11.91 14.77 17.37 25 0.60 0.96 1.22 1.81 2.41 2.92 3.16 3.82 4.59 5.69 6.46 7.09 8.01 8.81 11.38 13.53 16.58 19.34 50 0.65 1.04 1.32 1.99 2.69 3.33 3.63 4.40 5.32 6.46 7.31 7.99 8.97 9.80 12.57 14.78 17.95 20.81 100 0.70 1.11 1.40 2.15 2.95 3.71 4.08 4.96 6.03 7.27 8.20 8.92 9.96 10.80 13.76 16.02 19.30 22.22 200 0.74 1.17 1.47 2.29 3.2 ] 4.11 4.55 5.56 6.78 8. ] 3 9.13 9.88 10.99 11.82 14.98 17.26 20.63 23.61 500 0.78 1.23 1.55 2.46 3.53 4.62 5.18 6.35 7.80 9.33 10.43 11.22 12.39 13.21 62 16. -- 18.89 22.35 25.40 1000 0.81 1.28 1.61 2.61 3.81 5.08 5.76 7.08 8.76 10.30 11.46 12.29 13.51 ] 4.31 17.89 20.14 23.66 26.72 i ne rower Douno or Tne continence mu:rvai at au?n conneence ieveT is me vaae wnicn o7e or me sanuiamo quanTe vaues Tor a given frequency are was man. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Storm Data Group Detailed Report: User Defined IDF Table - 1 Element Details ID 15 Notes Label User Defined IDF Table - 1 Duration 2 Year 5 Year 10 Year 25 Year 50 Year 100 Year (min) (in/hr) (in/hr) (in/hr) (in/hr) (in/hr) (in/hr) 5.000 5.120 6.130 7.070 7.940 8.650 9.270 10.000 4.090 4.910 5.660 6.320 6.880 7.370 15.000 3.430 4.140 4.770 5.350 5.810 6.210 30.000 2.370 2.940 3.450 3.960 4.380 4.760 60.000 1.490 1.890 2.250 2.640 2.970 3.280 Library Status Summary Synchronization Details ID 15 Label User Defined OF Table - 1 Modified Date 9/15/2009 2:06:14 PM M:\CALC U LATI O N S\Stormwater\Stor Library Source m Drainage\StormCad\NC Area IDFs.xml Library Modified Date 8/26/2009 5:30:56 PM Synchronization Status Synchronize to Library Engineering Reference Guid c59285df-cec6-4619-b823- cdf3bc4f71 a 1 9.500 9.000 8.500 8.000 7.500 7.000 6.500 6.000 5.500 5.000 4.500 4.000 3.500 3.000 2.500 2.000 1.500 1.000 . I f a b.000 11.000 1t5.000 24.000 30.000 36.000 42.000 48.000 54.000 60.000 Duration (min) Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Bentley StormCAD V8 XM Edition 3043-Storm Design 7-9-09.stc Center [08.09.081.00] 27 Siemon Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, Page 1 of 1 9/15/2009 CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Composite C Values PROJECT NAME: Pilot Lions Park PROJECT NUMBER: 3043 CWoods= 0.25 Cimperv.= 0.95 CLawn= 0.30 CGreve[= 0:55 BY: TMT DATE: 9/22/09 REV: AREA Drainage Areas Acres COMPOSITE Woods Lawn Im erv. Gravel Total C CMALC'FF1H U.UU U,.SI U'.2b U.UU 0.56 0.59 SWALE' #1 B 0.00 4.92 0.30 0.00 5.22 0.34 SWALE>#1C 0.00 9.91 0.65 0.00 10.56 0.34 SWALE #2 0'00 4.78 0.52 0.00 5.30 0.36 SWALE #3 0.00 2.12 0.05 0.00 2.17 0.31 TOTAL 0.00 16.81 1.22 0.00 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 J t 1 1 Project Name: Pilot Lions Park' Project No.: 3043A Sheet Title: DI-1 Calculated By: TMT Date: 8/26/2009 Post-develop ed Tc Calculation SHEET FLOW Segment ID: Surface description (table 3-1): Grass Manning's roughness coeff., n: 0.240 Flow length, L (total L<300') (ft): 100.0 2yr 24 hour rainfall, P (in): 316 0.00 > 0.00 Land slope, s (ft/ft): 0.021 0.000> 0,010.0 ? , Tc= 0.007 (nQ ^0.8 Tc (min.)= 14.1 0.0 0.0 P^0.5 x s"0.4 Total Sheet Flow Tc = 14.1 min. 0.23 hr. SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW Segment ID: B Paved or Unpaved Unpaved' Unpaved Flow length, L (ft): 121.0 Watercourse slope, s (ft/ft): 0:016 O,OOfl' 0,000 ............. ._ Average velocity, V (ft/s) = 16.1345(s)^0.5: 2.02 0.01 0.01 TC= L / (3600xV) Tc (min.)= 1.0 0.0 0.0 Total Shallow Concentrated Flow Tc = 1.0 min. 0.02 hr. CHANNEL FLOW Segment ID: Manning's Coefficient Hydraulic Radius, R (ft) = (A/Pw) Cross Sectional Area, A (ft" 2) Wetted perimeter, Pw (ft) Channel slope, s (ft/ft) Velocity, V (ft/s): = (1.49`r^(2/3)`s^(0.5)/n Flow length, L (ft): TC= L / (3600xV) Tc (min.) Total Sheet Flow TG = 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 " 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 ! 0,000 ......... 1490.00 1490.00 . 1490.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 min. 0.00 hr. = Minutes ......................... 3043_TC-Calculator 8-26-09:xl9; -. Project Name: Pilot Lions Park Project No.: 3043A Sheet Title: DI-10 Calculated By: TMT Date: 8/26/2009 Post-developed Tc Calculation SHEET FLOW Segment ID: Surface description (table 3-1): Manning's roughness coeff., n: Flow length, L (total L<300') (ft): 2yr 24 hour rainfall, P (in): Land slope, s (ft/ft): Tc= 0.007 (nQ ^0.8 Tc (min.)= P^0.5 x s^0.4 Total Sheet Flow Tc = SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW 16.6 min. 0.28 hr. Segment ID: 6 Paved or Unpaved Unpaved Unpaved Flow length, L (ft): 104.0 Watercourse slope, s (ft/ft): OAA3 0.000 ! Q,OQO Average velocity, V (ft/s) = 16.1345(s)^0.5: 1.80 0.01 0.01 TC= L / (3600xV) Tc (min.)= 1.0 0.0 0.0 Total Shallow Concentrated Flow Tc = 1.0 min. 0.02 hr. CHANNEL FLOW Segment ID: Manning's Coefficient 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hydraulic Radius, R (ft) _ (A/Pw) 1.00 1.00 1.00 Cross Sectional Area, A (ft^2) 0.00 0,00 0.00 Wetted perimeter, Pw (ft) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Channel slope, s (ft/ft) 0.000 4.000 0.000 Velocity, V (ft/s): _ (1.49" r^(2/3)"'s^(0.5)/n 1490.00 1490.00 1490.00 Flow length, L (ft): 0:00 0100 0:00 TC= L / (3600xV) Tc (min.)= 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Sheet Flow Tc = 0.0 min. 0.00 hr. Minutes 3043_TC-Calculator 8-26-09.x#s, DI=10' 1 J t F 1 1 1 1 1 1 Project Name: Pilot Lions Park Project No.: 3043A Sheet Title: SWALE #2 Calculated By: TMT Date: 8/26/2009 Post-developed Tc Calculation SHEET FLOW Segment ID: Surface description (table 3-1): Manning's roughness coeff., n: Flow length, L (total L<300') (ft) 2yr 24 hour rainfall, P (in): Land slope, s (ft/ft): Tc= 0.007 K) "0.8 Tc (min.)= P^0.5 x s^0.4 Total Sheet Flow Tc = SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW Segment ID: Paved or Unpaved Flow length, L (ft): Watercourse slope, s (ft/ft): Average velocity, V (ft/s) = 16.1345(s)^0.5: Tc= L / (3600xV) Tc (min.)= Total Shallow Concentrated Flow Tc = CHANNEL FLOW Segment ID: Manning's Coefficient Hydraulic Radius, R (ft) _ (A/Pw) Cross Sectional Area, A (ft^2) Wetted perimeter, Pw (ft) Channel slope, s (ft/ft) Velocity, V (ft/s): _ (1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(0.5)/n Flow length, L (ft): TC= L / (3600xV) Tc (min.)= Total Sheet Flow Tc = 0.7 min. 0.01 hr. »:TQfa°ficafih " Minutes 3043_TC-Calculator 8-26-09.xis, SV1/A 1109 12.6 min. 0.21 hr. 3.1 0.0 0.0 3.1 min. 0.05 hr. 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 91.25 0.00 0.06 12.49 0.00 0.00 0.023 0.000 0.000 .........::. 6.98 1490.00 1490.00 286,00 0.00 0.0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 Project Name: Pilot Lions Park Project No.: 3043A Sheet Title: SWALE #3 Calculated By: TMT Date: 8/26/2009 Post-developed Tc Calculation SHEET FLOW Segment ID: Surface description (table 3-1): Manning's roughness coeff., n: Flow length, L (total L<300') (ft): 2yr 24 hour rainfall, P (in): Land slope, s (ft/ft): Tc= 0.007 (nQ ^0.8 Tc (min.)= P^0.5 x s^0.4 Total Sheet Flow Tc = SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW Segment ID: Paved or Unpaved Flow length, L (ft): Watercourse slope, s (ft/ft): Average velocity, V (ft/s) = 16.1345(s)^0.5: TC= L / (3600xV) Tc (min.)= Total Shallow Concentrated Flow Tc = CHANNEL FLOW 16.1 min. 0.27 hr. 'B Unpaved Unpaved 116.0 0422 0000 41000 2.37 0.01 0.01 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.8 min. 0.01 hr. Segment ID: C Manning's Coefficient 0.03 0.00 0.00 Hydraulic Radius, R (ft) = (A/Pw) 0.90 1.00 1.00 Cross Sectional Area, A (ft^2) 11.2$ 0.00: 0.00 Wetted perimeter, Pw (ft) 12.49 0.00 0.00 Channel slope, s (ft/ft) 0.152 0.000 0.000 Velocity, V (ft/s): = (1.49*rA(2/3)'s^(0.5)/n 18.06 1490.00 1490.00 Flow length, L (ft): 17.00 0100 0.00 Tc= L / (3600xV) Tc (min.)= 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Sheet Flow Tc = 0.0 min. 0.00 hr. Minutes 3043_TC-Calculator 8-26-09.xls, 1 1 Project Name: Pilot Lions Park ' Project No.: 3043A Sheet Title: SWALE #1 B ' Calculated By: TMT Date: 8/26/2009 Post-developed Tc Calculation SHEET FLOW Segment ID: Surface description (table 3-1): Manning's roughness coeff., n: Flow length, L (total L<300') (ft): 2yr 24 hour rainfall, P (in): Land slope, s (ft/ft): TC= 0.007 (nL) ^0.8 Tc (min.)= P^0.5 x s^0.4 Total Sheet Flow Tc = SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW 15.4 min. 0.26 hr. Segment ID: B Paved or Unpaved Un'paved' Unpaved Flow length, L (ft): 373.0 Watercourse slope, s (ft/ft): Oa?19 ... ... ..... D,QOp!' OrQOQ ................................................................ Average velocity, V (ft/s) = 16.1345(s)^0.5: 2.21 0.01 0.01 TC= L / (3600xV) Tc (min.)= 2.8 0.0 0.0 Total Shallow Concentrated Flow Tc = 2.8 min. 0.05 hr. CHANNEL FLOW Segment ID: Manning's Coefficient Hydraulic Radius, R (ft) _ (A/Pw) Cross Sectional Area, A (ft" 2) Wetted perimeter, Pw (ft) Channel slope, s (ft/ft) Velocity, V (ft/s): _ (1.49*r^(2/3)*s^(0.5)/n Flow length, L (ft): Tc= L / (3600xV) Tc (min.)= Total Sheet Flow Tc = 0.03 0..00 0.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 11.25 0,00 ! 0100 12.49 0.00 0.00 0.005 0.000 0.000 3.28 1490.00 1490.00 321,00 0100 040 1.6 0.0 0.0 1.6 min. 0.03 hr. Minutes 3043_TC-Calculator 8-26-09.xis, Project Name: Pilot Lions Park Project No.: 3043A Sheet Title: SWALE #1 C Calculated By: TMT Date: 8/26/2009 Post-developed Tc Calculation SHEET FLOW Segment ID: A Surface description (table 3-1): Grass Manning's roughness coeff., n: 0.240 Flow length, L (total L<300') (ft): 100.0 2yr 24 hour rainfall, P (in): 3.44 0.00 Omoo Land slope, s (ft/ft): 0,020 0,000 OFOOQ Tc= 0.007 (nQ ^0.8 Tc (min.)= 13.8 0.0 0.0 P^0.5 x s^0.4 Total Sheet Flow Tc = 13.8 min. 0.23 hr. SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW Segment ID: B Paved or Unpaved Unpaved Unpaved Flow length, L (ft): 1125.Q Watercourse slope, s (ft/ft): 0.020 ._ 0.000 O.OOQ . _ .............._ .::..:. Average velocity, V (ft/s) = 16.1345(s)^0.5: 2.30 0.01 0.01 Tc= L / (3600xV) Tc (min.)= 8.1 0.0 0.0 Total Shallow Concentrated Flow Tc = 8.1 min. 0.14 hr. CHANNEL FLOW Segment ID: C Manning's Coefficient 0.01 0.00 0.00 Hydraulic Radius, R (ft) = (A/Pw) 0.79 1.00 1.00 Cross Sectional Area, A (ft^2) 1.98 0.00 0.00 Wetted perimeter, Pw (ft) 2.50 0.00 0.00 Channel slope, s (ft/ft) 0.007 0.004 0.600 Velocity, V (ft/s): = (1.49*r^(2/3)*s"(0.5)/n 8.21 1490.00 1490.00 Flow length, L (ft): 53.00 0.00 0.00 TC= L / (3600xV) Tc (min.)= 0.1 0.0 0.0 Total Sheet Flow Tc = 0.1 min. 0.00 hr. Minutes 3043_TC-Calculator 8-26-09.xis, n 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 Summary of Time of Concentration(s) Area No. Basin Area [Ac] Tc [Min] 10 Year Rainfall Intensity [Ins/Hr] 2 Year Rainfall Intensity [Ins/Hr] DI-1 3.19 15.1 5.02 3 42 DI-10 1.19 17.5 4.71 3.25 SWALE #2 5.30 16.3 4.85 3.34 SWALE #3 2.17 16.9 4.78 3.30 SWALE #1 B 5.22 19.9 4.44 3,08 SWALE #1 C 10.56 22.0 4.23 2.94 All storm items N/A 5.0 7.07 5.12 ** All other inlets not listed use a minimum of 5 min. Time of Concentration Table 3.1 Roughness Coefficients (Manning's n) for Sheet Flow Surface Description n Smooth Surfaces (concrete, asphalt, gravel, or bare soil) 0.011 Fallow (no residue) 0.05 Cultivated Soils Residue cover <=20% 0.06 Residue cover >20% 0.17 Grass Short grass prairie 0.15 Dense grasses 0.24 Bermudagrass 0.41 Range 0.13 Woods Light underbrush 0.4 Dense underbrush 0.5 aD r U Cl) E O rb E E m ° co ca v CO) o c v `o ° c O c Lo U co U co LL p -yp F m c? v LO ° - -- Y ° o f o f E O 0 0 p p c c° W O W O O O 0 O o O o o W O E E ti w N E •C v O N c c N N N N N O U c U c U c U c fq C N N/ n CL Y1 a C o c 0 c C 0 c C c c c C . c c c c J! . e 2 o a U C) U 0 U 0 U 0 0 a 0 U 0 U 0 U o U r a = a °- CL O O O O O M O O O co O r- O P- O C=) O O N O C ' 6. y LL o o O O O O O o O CD O y co O O O O O O O O O O N d U 0 LL M N O 00 N U') C N co M l0 I? U'> cD Cn co .J U - F- m ? Q a p v °O w N N N co co N co c 0 S a? ? •c d a a a ? a. a s a a a .? ? ? n U U v U U U U v U U U ?? a LL a U U o ? ? o C a?+ LO co c:> O C) (O MO M LO O N c) U-) C) ca . LL ai rn ao co M M M M ai d m C N co N Cl) N M N Cl) N M N Cl) N M N M N Cl) co M m e . M O O cOD M OR V: O O 07 m _n + 0i : C,> • d i N N N N N N N N N Cl) C c M co M co M M M M M ? ? M O E I ° .? LL rn c:- C) M °o N o o -i N M M co l M c 7 M l M M M O W M C ) M M C ) M M M cp O O L E co n ca CIJ O co co ~ %2 c? ? 00 p o 6 Z 00 w °? O X p Z _m U D W O O cn w CO w CO w x ° O D LL w a n D c N f/) a CA o 3 01 0 C N y G1 ~ H C O ?- N M 'cr iA co N c0 O 0 Z U H 2 O O O ; D ; D ; lL U U U) w U) w Z c C() c 0 Z U d 4t LL. LL LL. • w N m w C N ED N C L ? ' c O p o m N LL O L u N Z U Cn 11 l N L A 6 U W f LL r i v C O N ?lm L 1 1 w O ' O C6 c N d E OOp 0 U) O ' N M N N M O O O -Z6 U- g a 0 c? > E 0 1 Y m (L co cu C co o CD a O ' N .a U E E zz() 6 a O O (V N U O D U U O U o U C 0 C C C C C C C C C M ?•- ? N 00 ? 00 ? M ? ? N t1• N ? N cC) .-- C Ch M M M M M M M M M •? _ 0 0 _ 0 0 0 _ 0 _ 0 0 0 C O O O O O O O O O cc m a> a? a? a? - •c m a> a? a? a? a> a? a> i CU U U U U U U U U U ? U U U U U U U U U p C m v o 00 p CO M 0 ? > ? to h (n 00 04 00 00 N M C y N N N N M N N (rJ N C M M M M M M Co O (D Z N U) 0) CD V U? co v LO W 0 5 E E 0 0 E O . W LL (n C ? Lq M M O CMD p 1O N to C N M co Cl) N N N C') N N N - N M M CO M M M N Z CD Co CA M V L9 CD ca N ? CQ CC) O C? 0 7 7 cu D_ n. d a cL cL a CL CL C 0- (D cD _ cli co O C a O O m M M M (y M M M N M M M M M N M M M co _N W c 7 O CO N N - (D M I? ? O N M M M (?j M M M M ce) M M M a) W N 3 v) co C_ 0 o (D ? LO O M ?c° (D r- CO a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0-z? 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U N U w M . 0 N Cp CO to ? O M t- O 4 r- Lf? C ? ? fU J 0) LO 'T Ch W P-- N 0) CO M M O ?t v O ? M Gi M Lo LL ? N Em r .- r- - r - .- - - =m Z ? 0 ? ? CQ 00 (A M `q' In ? ? o a a a- a- m m a ? N (D O X rn 0- C14 N (n C C1 7 0 'gym U E O 19 (7 O M CD 0 O N CO N CA U U 0 O L6 (A C Q) y N 0 E O 0 O O M N O N M 0 N N O jy ca m .0 0 0 > E O Y f0 d U) C6 C - O co J 0 ce) O (D O U E EH ca :3 = zzcl) U U V O N O a O O CU d d ? rn V p p N "t C0 ? h t- 0 00 0 N 0') N OO 0 Vn 00 N T v )n N N v o o m o CD Q L ? > T U? T t` CO O O U w- ?rj T T N N N N T N > rn '? T co v `n )n U cc O N T r N N N N 'p R (? ^ ? 00 00 ? 00 00 N r- :3 -g T CO 00 00 h 0 ti 0 0 0 0 r-? 0 0 CA 0) =3 N N N N Cl) N N M N N CU C CO CO Cl) M cM Cl) Cl) V) M T J 2 N N ? (? .-. LE) 00 O Co M T 00 LO N C U Cl h u h Cl O Cl? 1! - 7 00 N 0 N 0 N 0 N 0 M 0 M 0 N 0 M 0 Cl) c C M c) M M OM OM M M OM T J 2 N CO M O C? 'T L? T m( L CL M m m m m ri .r rn O i C6 C . N N O O O N M N co CD N N N '0 O O E > ' O U) J 1 Y p (c L9 0 IL C . N to O m . V 0 I (6 a- oMU 0 o E E = Z Z 07 U U N N Q ' CL CL w 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 = C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 La r r r r r r r r r U _ cn (6 C O U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 U) O 7 U) M I,- IT M 0) I,- LO 00 2 LO O N LO r O O In D) I'- M O r Cl (0 0 O v O O r O O O O o O U O N T Ln CO r M M 'It z M 00 Il- Iq It V M "*: M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O C;) N C ? V O r- m m v N C Lf) c6 r 0 h 7 N 7- N v r Co Cl) 0 C) 0 C) C) N ? C Q o? o o Ln o Ln Ln o Ln o LA Ln N M M O O CO C0 I- M M W M fA M M W W C N M N M N M N M N M N M . M . M . M O- 0 0 0 0 0 LO 0, M CD O Ln I-- O O N 0 - 0 CU E O M M M N N N N M N ' N M M M M M M M M ? M M M M M M M M M C ? 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c) :6 0) 0 1- 0 0 N 0O 0 C > C 6 CM M M N N N N M M co M M M M M M M 2 c c C V) ? r ? ? 00 00 0 ? M tA J 0 0 0 0 0 C v O ? ? O V' M N O LI) tA O r C Lp CO ?f ?f I? M CO r V ? O V O M O O O O M O 0 3 o v i n i n v i n v ? ? c n c ? ? c ? O C C C C C C C C C ^ O N C) W ' M M N W W ? , ? 00 O (p O r V ? 1? CO M r r O O r O r ? L17 N 0 00 M M N 00 00 d` CO O r ? ? f? .- CD M O C O O r ? 0 0 r O r 75 r ? C C0 M M T M L 0 i 0 0 O U o U Cl) (0 X O O O T N N O 7 _d 7 0 _0 U E O CY) IT O M O O 0 N M N LT U N O O LO rn c N N 0 E L 06 O M N "i N O N M O a) rD U- 0 ? U ? E O /Y co Y L m a co m c ? O J fII O "It °O L m 7 Q Z Z U) U U - t N N Q O O cn X O O r N N 0) 7 ' Q 7 O U ' O Y M O ' co m 1 O O N , M N O? 1 7 (n O T C P N a) 0 0 ' - O O O ? N M Cq N ' N O C'S m O N N LL 0 M CU ? U E O Cn Y ' cu CO C C p O ' ce) y O 'IT j ° U d a ? ' O U N m 7 j z z a a o ff 5' a CL a w O .O O Z T co 'It L? Co co CA ° T 0 O D 5 5 5 5 5 _ U U O U C M O I- Lo I- CO co CY) CO co O O M co T p O M M ct I? M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (0 C O CU N M M O T N M LO M ? C to T Cfl ?' ? I? M d' Cfl 3 ?}' M O O O O O O ? o 0 LL U f6 C N L0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U N ti cu C C E O C O O T L L N E Lo r- o o Lo L Lo Lo Lo } C U T T C O U N N U m T m ? CO N t-- T M I v N N T m I? I- (? O M T 0 0 CD C> O T O Q T M 1 In 9 m to OT T m J U U U U U U U U U N (0 X o rn O N N O 3 C2 7 0 .a CO U O U) i M V O M O O O N M N 1 Ditch/Swale Flows PROJECT NAME: Pilot Lions Park BY: `Tristan Teasley PROJECT NUMBER: 3043 DATE: 9/22/09 All flows and intensitys are designed for the 10 year storm event. Swale 1A Area = 0.56 ac, Length= 5#0 ft. Intensity = 7.07 in/hr Inv. Up 344.5 Tc = 5.0 min. Inv. Down= 336.0 Comp. C = U.59 Slope= 1.7% Q = C"I*A = 2.34 cfs Swale 1 B Area = 5.22 ac. Length= 250 ft. Intensity = 4.44 in/hr Inv. Up 336.0 Tc = 18.0 min. Inv. Down= 334.7 Comp. C = 0.34 Slope= 0.5% Q = C" I *A = 7.88 cfs Qtotej = 10.22 cfs (inc ludes flow from SWALE #1A.) Swale 1C Area = 10.56 ac. Length= 4T3 ft. Intensity = 4.23 in/hr Inv. Up 334.7 Tc = 22.0 min. Inv. Down= 330.6 Comp. C = 0.34 Slope= 0.9% Q = C`I`A = 15.19 cfs Qtotai = 25.39 cfs (inc ludes flow from SWALE #1 B.) Swale 2 Area = 5.30 ac.> > Length= 436 ft. Intensity = 4.85 in/hr Inv. Up 335.5 Tc = 16.3 min. Inv. Down= 326.5 Comp. C = 0.36 Slope= 2.3% Q=C'I"A= 9.25 cfs Swale 3 Area = 2.17 ac. Length= 185 ft. Intensity = 4.78 in/hr Inv. Up 327.5 Tc = 16.9 min. !> Inv. Down= 324.5 Comp. C = 0!.31 Slope= 1.6% Q = C*I"A = 10.37 cfs Qtotai = 22.75 cfs (includeA49 4464AM 9P fades and velocitys.xis Page 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Swale Design Flow and Depth PROJECT NAME: Pilot Lions Park BY: Tristan Teasley PROJECT NUMBER: 3043 DATE: 9/10/2009, REV: ' Channel # Grass Swale #1A Estimating Mannings'n' per ESCPDM Page 8.05.6 Step # Variable Result Description C 0.59 1) Q= 2.34 cfs (Q1o) 1.7 cfs (Q2) I 7.07 2) S= 0.017 ft/ft A 0.56: 3) VP 4.5 fps Permissible Velocity per Table 8.05a 4) Size= 0.52 fe =Q/Vp 5) R= 0.45 Hydraulic Radius =bd+Zd' / b+2d(Z41)'rs (Figure 8.05b) Where b= 2 (Trapezoidal Bottom Width) df= 0.7 (Trapezoidal depth) Z= 3 (e/d) A= 2.87 (Cross Sectional Area) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) Using Retardance Curve D From Figure 8.05c VPR= 2.01 Mannings'n' (As read from gra ph)= 0.045 V= 2.52 fps Actual V from Manning's Equation Qc= 7.24 cfs Actual channel capacity. Check Vp>V Vp= 4.5 fps V= 2.52 fps Check Qc>Q Qc= 7.24 cfs Q= 2.34 cfs OK? YES (If Vp>V, then OK) YES (If Qc>Q, then OK) Is a temp liner required? YES (NOTE 1- 8.05.7 ESCPDM) U= I.z ue Ln mciuatn treeooara Using Retardance Curve B From Figure 8.05c VPR= 2.01 Mannings'n' (As read from graph)= 0.096 V= 1.18 fps Actual V from Manning's Equation Qc= 3.39 cfs Actual channel capacity. Check Vp>V Vp= 4.5 fps V= 1.18 fps Check Qc>Q Qc= 3.39 cfs Q= 2.34 cfs OK? YES (If Vp>V, then OK) YES (If Qc>Q, then OK) Isa rm'ntliner required? NO (NOTE 1-8.05.7 ESCPDM 11) N/A G W cn C C ro 4 ' 3 Average Length of Vegetation 0n) Curve 2 A Longer than 30' 11' to 24' . ' A B . S to ta to 6' L h " C D E ess t an 2 I e 09 06 ° 04 e A2 .? .? .o .o i.v e 9 b 13 10 20 VR, Product of Velocity and Hydraulic Radius Figure 8.05c Manning's nfoisted to velocity, hydraulic radius, and vegetal retardance. Note: From Sample Problem 13.05a multiply Vp x Hydralulic Radius (4.5x0.54-2A3), then enter the product of VR and extend a straight One up to Relardance class'D% next project a straight One to the left to determine a trial manning's n. Rev. IZ93 Worksheet for SWALE #1 A - D Curve Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth input Data Roughness Coefficient 0.045 Channel Slope 0.01700 ft/ft Left Side Slope 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) Right Side Slope 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) Bottom Width 2.00 ft Discharge 2.34 ft'/s Results Normal Depth 0.40 ft Flow Area 1.27 ft2 Wetted Perimeter 4.51 ft Top Width 4.38 ft Critical Depth 0.30 ft Critical Slope 0.04996 ft/ft Velocity 1.85 ft/s Velocity Head 0.05 ft Specific Energy 0.45 ft Froude Number 0.61 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output' Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 0.40 ft Critical Depth 0.30 ft Channel Slope 0.01700 ft/ft Critical Slope 0.04996 ft/ft Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Bentley FlowMaster [08.01.071.00] 912312009 12:43:28 PM 27 Slemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Worksheet for SWALE #1A - B Curve Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Roughness Coefficient 0.096 Channel Slope 0.01700 ft /ft Left Side Slope 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) Right Side Slope 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) Bottom Width 2.00 ft Discharge R 2.34 ft3/s esults Normal Depth 0.58 ft Flow Area 2.19 ft2 Wetted Perimeter 5.69 ft Top Width 5.50 ft Critical Depth 0.30 ft Critical Slope 0.22737 ft/ft Velocity 1.07 ft/s Velocity Head 0.02 ft Specific Energy 0.60 ft Froude Number 0.30 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 0.58 ft Critical Depth 0.30 ft Channel Slope 0.01700 ft /ft Critical Slope 0.22737 ft/ft Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Bentley FlowMaster [08.01.071.00] 9/2312009 12:43:47 PM 27 Slemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Swale Design Flow and Depth PROJECT NAME: Pilot Lions Park BY: Tristan Teasley PROJECT NUMBER: 3043 DATE: 9110/2009 REV: Channel # Grass Swale #1 B Estimating Mannings 'n' per ESCPDM Page 8.05.6 Step # Variable Result Description C N/A 1) Q= 1032 cis (Q10) 7.3 cfs (Q2) I N/A 2) S= 0.005 ft/ft A N/A 3) VP 4.5 fps Permissible Velocity per Table 8.05a 4) Size= 2.27 ft = QNp 5) R= 0.85 Hydraulic Radius =bd+Zd2 / b+2d(V+1)'n (Figure 8.05b) Where b= 2 (Trapezoidal Bottom Width) df= 1.5 (Trapezoidal depth) Z= 3 (e/d) A= 9.75 (Cross Sectional Area) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) Using Retardance Curve D From Figure 8.05c VpR= 3.82 Mannings'n' (As read from gra ph)= 0.039 V= 2.45 fps Actual V from Manning's Equation Qc= 23.88 cis Actual channel capacity. Check Vp>V Vp= 4.5 fps V= 2.45 fps Check Qc>Q Qc= 23.88 cis Q= 10.22 cis OK? YES (If Vp>V, then OK) YES (If Qc>Q, then OK) Is a temp liner required? YES (NOTE 1- 8.05.7 ESCPDM) Z (ueptn including freeboard) Using Retardance Curve B From Figure 8.05c VpR= 3.82 Mannings'n' (As read from graph)= 0.070 V= 1.34 fps Actual V from Manning's Equation Qc= 13.10 cis Actual channel capacity. Check Vp>V VP= 4.5 fps V= 1.34 fps Check Qc>Q Qc= 13.10 cfs Q= 10.22 cfs DK? YES (If Vp>V, then OK) YES (If QC>Q, then OK) s a penn'nt liner required? NO (NOTE 1- 8.05.7 ESCPDM) 11) N/A Q to m c c m 4 3 Average englh of Vegeta0on p n) Curve 2 Laver than Nr 11" to 24' 6' " A 8 . to 10 2' to 6' L th 2" C D E I e e ss an . .08 0 06 0 04 E m .i .2 .4 .6 '.8 1.0 2 4 6 B 10 20 VR, Product of Velocity and Hydraulic Radius Figure 8.05c Manning's n related to velocity, hydraulic radius, and vegetal retardance. Note: From Sample Problem 8.05a multipty Vp x Hydralullc Radius (4.5x0.54-2.43), then enter the product of VR and extend a straight One up b Retardance class "D', next prolecta straight One to the left to determine a trial manning's n. Rev. 12r93 i Worksheet for SWALE #1 B - D Curve Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Roughness Coefficient Channel Slope Left Side Slope Right Side Slope Bottom Width Discharge Results Normal Depth Flow Area Wetted Perimeter Top Width Critical Depth Critical Slope Velocity Velocity Head Specific Energy Froude Number Flow Type GVF Input Data Downstream Depth Length Number Of Steps GVF Output Data Upstream Depth Profile Description Profile Headloss Downstream Velocity Upstream Velocity Normal Depth Critical Depth Channel Slope Critical Slope 0.039 0.00500 ft/ft 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) 2.00 ft 10.22 ft'/s 1.03 ft 5.24 ft2 8.51 ft 8.18 ft 0.67 ft 0.03039 ft/ft 1.95 ft/s 0.06 ft 1.09 it 0.43 Subcritical 0.00 ft 0.00 ft 0 0.00 ft 0.00 ft Infinity ft/s Infinity ft/s 1.03 ft 0.67 ft 0.00500 ft/ft 0.03039 ft/ft Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Bentley FlowMaster [08.01.071.00] 9123/2009 12:43:33 PM 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Worksheet for SWALE #1 B - B Curve Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Roughness Coefficient 0.070 Channel Slope 0.00500 ft/ft Left Side Slope 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) Right Side Slope 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) Bottom Width 2.00 ft Discharge 10.22 ft'/s Results Normal Depth 1.34 ft Flow Area 8.09 ftZ Wetted Perimeter 10.49 ft Top Width 10.06 ft Critical Depth 0.67 ft Critical Slope 0.09791 ft/ft Velocity 1.26 ft/s Velocity Head 0.02 ft Specific Energy 1.37 ft Froude Number 0.25 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input Data ; Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 1.34 ft Critical Depth 0.67 ft Channel Slope 0.00500 ft/ft Critical Slope 0.09791 ft/ft Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Bentley FlowMaster [08.01.071.00] 91231200912:43:51 PM 27 Slemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Swale Design Flow and Depth PROJECT NAME: Pilot Lions Park BY: Tristan Teasley PROJECT NUMBER : 3043 DATE: 9/1 012 0 0 9 REV: Channel # Grass Swale #1C Estimating Mannings'n ' per ESCPDM Page 8.05.6 Step # Variable Result Description C N/A 1) Q= 25.39 cfs (Q1o) 18.2 cfs (Q2) I N/A 2) S= 0.009 ftlft A N/A' 3) Vp 4.5 fps Permissible Velocity per Table 8.05a 4) Size= 5.64 ft' =Q/Vp 5) R= 1.00 Hydraulic Radius =bd+Zd' / b+2d(Z'+1)1? (Figure 8.05b) Where b= 2 (Trapezoidal Bottom Width) df= 1.8 (Trapezoidal depth) Z= 3 (e/d) A= 13.32 (Cross Sectional Area) 6) t 7) 8) 9) 10) Using Retardance Curve D From Figure 8.05c VPR= 4.48 Mannings'n' (As read from gra ph)= 0.038 V= 3.75 fps Actual V from Manning's Equation QC= 50.01 cfs Actual channel capacity. Check Vp>V VP= 4.5 fps V= 3.75 fps Check Qc>Q Qc= 50.01 cis Q= 25.39 cfs OK? YES (If Vp>V, then OK) YES (If Qc>Q, then OK) Is a temp liner required? YES (NOTE 1- 8.05.7 ESCPDM) U= Z.3 ve m inciuoln rreeooara Using Retardance Curve B From Figure 8.05c VPR= 4.48 Mannings'n' (As read from graph)= 0.065 V= 2.16 fps Actual V from Manning's Equation Qc= 28.79 cfs Actual channel capacity. Check Vp>V VP= 4.5 fps V= 2.16 fps Check Qc>Q Qc= 28.79 cfs Q= 25.39 cfs OK? YES (If Vp>V, then OK) YES (If Qc>Q, then OK) Isa erm'ntliner required? NO (NOTE 1-8.05.7 ESCPDM 11) N/A 1 1 1 4 . 9 AVeragaLen lh of Vegetation an) Curve 2 A Langer Oren 30' 11' to 24' 6' ' A B . to 1 g 2' to 6' L h " C D E ess t an 2 I B . 08 c 06 04 E ff 7 02 I -- CO 01 C .C C ..c .4 .b '.u W 2 4 6 8 10 20 VR, Product of Velocity and Hydraulic Radius Figure6.05c Manning's nrelated to velocity, hydraulic radius, and vegetal retardance. Note. From Sample Problem 8.05a multiply Vp x Hydralultc Radius (4.5xo.54-2.43), Man enter the product of VR and exlond a straight fine up to Retardance class "13% next project a straight fine loft left to determine a trial manning's n. Rev. 12r93 Worksheet for SWALE #1 C - D Curve Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Roughness Coefficient 0.038 Channel Slope 0.00900 ft/ft Left Side Slope 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) Right Side Slope 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) Bottom Width 2.00 ft Discharge 25.39 ft'/s Results Normal Depth 1.35 ft Flow Area 8.13 ft= Wetted Perimeter 10.51 ft Top Width 10.08 ft Critical Depth 1.06 ft Critical Slope 0.02552 ft/ft Velocity 3.12 ft/s Velocity Head 0.15 ft Specific Energy 1.50 ft Froude Number 0.61 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 1.35 ft Critical Depth 1.06 ft Channel Slope 0.00900 ft/ft Critical Slope 0.02552 ft/ft Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Bentley FlowMaster [08.01.071.00] 9/23/200912:43:37 PM 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 1 1 1 Worksheet for SWALE #1 C - B Curve Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Roughness Coefficient 0.065 Channel Slope 0.00900 ft/ft Left Side Slope 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) Right Side Slope 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) Bottom Width 2.00 ft Discharge 25.39 ft-/s Results Normal Depth 1.70 ft Flow Area 12.13 ft2 Wetted Perimeter 12.78 ft Top Width 12.23 ft Critical Depth 1.06 ft Critical Slope 0.07468 ft/ft Velocity 2.09 ft/s Velocity Head 0.07 ft Specific Energy 1.77 ft Froude Number 0.37 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 1.70 ft Critical Depth 1.06 ft Channel Slope 0.00900 ft/ft Critical Slope 0.07468 ft/ft Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Bentley FlowMaster [08.01.071.00) 9123/2009 12:54:37 PM 27 Slemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Swale Design Flow and Depth PROJECT NAME: Pilot Lions Park : BY: Tristan Teasley PROJECT NUMBER : 3043 DATE: 9/1012009 REV: Channel # Grass Swale #2 Estimating Mannings'n ' per ESCPDM Page 8.05.6 Step # Variable Result Description C 0.36 1) Q= 9.25 cfs (Q10) 6.6 cfs (Q2) 1 4.85 2) S= 0.023 ft/ft A 5.3 3) Vp 4.5 fps Permissible Velocity per Table 8.05a 4) Size= 2.06 ft' =QNp 5) R= 0.60 Hydraulic Radius =bd+Zd' / b+2d(Z'+1)'* (Figure 8.05b) Where b= 2 (Trapezoidal Bottom Width) df= 1 (Trapezoidal depth) Z= 3 (e/d) A= 5 (Cross Sectional Area) 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) U= ,.o ue m mciuam rreeDoara Using Retardance Curve D Using Retardance Curve B From Figure 8.05c VpR= 2.70 From Figure 8.05c VPR= 2.70 Mannings'n' (As read from gra ph)= 0.042 Mannings'n' (As read from graph)= 0.085 V= 3.81 fps Actual V from Manning's Equation V= 1.90 fps Actual V from Manning's Equation Qc= 19.06 cis Actual channel capacity. QC= 9.48 cfs Actual channel capacity. Check Vp>V VP= 4.5 fps Check Vp>V Vp= 4.5 fps V= 3.81 fps V= 1.90 fps Check Qc>Q Qc= 19.06 cfs Check Qc>Q Qc= 9.48 cfs Q= 9.25 cfs Q= 9.25 cfs OK? YES (If Vp>V, then OK) OK? YES (If Vp>V, then OK) YES (If QC>Q, then OK) YES (If Qc>Q, then OK) Is a temp liner required? YES NOTE 1- 8.05.7 ESCPDM Is a erm'nt liner required? NO NOTE 1- 8.05.7 ESCPDM) 11) NIA .5 .4 .3 2 e m ? .I 'c m .08 .06 .04 .02 .I verageLengin of Vegetation pn) Curve A Longer than 3l7 11• to 24• B• t 0• A 8 C o 1 2• to 6• L th 2" D E s e ss an :nk 7 -A C . 0 E .c .4 b -.13 Lu 2 4 6 8 10 20 VR, Product of Velocity and Hydraulic Radius Figure 6.05c Manning's n related to velocity, hydraulic radlus, and vegetal retardance. Note: From Sample Prohlem 8.05a multiply Vp x Hydralullc Radius (4.5x0.54.2.43), then enter We product of VR and extend a straight fine up to Relardance class 'D*. next prolacta straight fine to the left to determine a trial manning's n. Rev. 12,93 1 1 1 Worksheet for SWALE #2 - D Curve Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Roughness Coefficient 0.042 Channel Slope 0.02300 ft/ft Left Side Slope 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) Right Side Slope 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) Bottom Width 2.00 ft Discharge 9.25 ft'/s Results Normal Depth 0.71 ft Flow Area 2.93 ftZ Wetted Perimeter 6.49 ft Top Width 6.26 ft Critical Depth 0.64 ft Critical Slope 0.03573 ft/ft Velocity 3.16 ft/s Velocity Head 0.15 ft Specific Energy 0.86 ft Froude Number 0.81 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth Length Number Of Steps GVF Output Data Upstream Depth Profile Description Profile Headloss Downstream Velocity Upstream Velocity Normal Depth Critical Depth. Channel Slope Critical Slope 0.00 ft 0.00 ft 0 0.00 ft 0.00 ft Infinity ft is Infinity ft/s 0.71 ft 0.64 ft 0.02300 ft/ft 0.03573 ft/ft Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Bentley FlowMaster [08.01.071.00] 9123/2009 12:43:40 PM 27 Slemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755.1666 Page 1 of 1 Worksheet for SWALE #2 - B Curve Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data,. Roughness Coefficient 0.085 Channel Slope 0.02300 ft/ft Left Side Slope 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) Right Side Slope 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) Bottom Width 2.00 ft Discharge 9,25 ft'/s Results Normal Depth 0.99 ft Flow Area 4.92 ft2 Wetted Perimeter 8.26 ft Top Width 7.94 ft Critical Depth 0.64 ft Critical Slope 0.14635 ft /ft Velocity 1.88 ft/s Velocity Head 0.05 ft Specific Energy 1.05 ft Froude Number 0.42 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 0.99 ft Critical Depth 0.64 ft Channel Slope 0.02300 ft/ft Critical Slope 0.14635 ft /ft Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Bentley FlowMaster 108.01.071.00] 9123/200912:43:55 PM 27 Siemons Company Drive Suits 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 11 l 1 1 1 Swale Design Flow and Depth PROJEC T NAME: Pilot Lions Park- BY: Tristan Teasley PROJECT NUMBER : 3043 DATE: 9/1012009 REV: Channel # Grass Swale #3 Estimating Mannings'n ' per ESCPDM Page 8.05.6 Step # Variable Result Description C NIA 1) Q= 22.75; cfs (Q1o) 16.3 cfs (Q2) I NIA 2) S= 0.016 ft/ft A NIA 3) VP 4.5 fps Permissible Velocity per Table 8.05a 4) Size= 5.06 ft' =QNp 5) R= 0.98 Hydraulic Radius =bd+Zd' / b+2d(Z4VM (Figure 8.05b) Where b= 5 (Trapezoidal Bottom Width) df= 1.5 (Trapezoidal depth) Z= 3 ' (e/d) A= 14.25 (Cross Sectional Area) Using Retardance Curve D From Figure 8.05c VPR= 4.43 Mannings'n' (As read from gra ph)= 0.038 V= 4.96 fps Actual V from Manning's Equation Qc= 70.69 cfs Actual channel capacity. Check Vp>V VP= 4.5 fps V= 4.96 fps Check Qc>Q Qc= 70.69 cfs Q= 22.75 cfs OK? NO (If Vp>V, then OK) YES (If Qc>Q, then OK) Is a temp liner required? YES (NOTE 1- 8.05.7 ESCPDM) z (Depth including freeboard) Using Retardance Curve B From Figure 8.05c VPR= 4.43 Mannings'n' (As read from graph)= 0.065 V= 2.85 fps Actual V from Manning's Equation CC= 40.57 cfs Actual channel capacity. Check Vp>V VP= 4.5 fps V= 2.85 fps Check Qc>Q Qc= 40.57 cfs Q= 22.75 cfs OK? YES (If Vp>V, then OK) YES (If Qc>Q, then OK) s a perm'nt liner required? NO (NOTE 1- 8.05.7 ESCPDM) 11) N/A 6) 7) 8) 9) 10) e CD c c Co 4 . 3 Average Length of Vegetation on) Curve 2 A Langer than an" 11" to 24" " " A B . 6 to 10 2" 1. 6" L " C D ess than 2 E I e . .0a 06 0 04 E .02 t =7ttf+--- .1 .o -.o W 2 4 6 a 10 20 VR, Product of Velocity and Hydraulic Radius Fgure 6.0 So Manning's nretaied to velocity,, hydraulic radius, and vegetal retardance. Note: From Sample Problem 8.05a rmidply Vp x Hydralultc Radius (4.5x0.54-2.43), Then enter Ins product of VR and extend a straight fine up to Retardance class "D'. next project a straight Bne to the left la determine a trial manning's n. Rev. 12,93 Worksheet for SWALE #3 - D Curve Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data,:: Roughness Coefficient 0.038 Channel Slope 0.01600 ft/ft Left Side Slope 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) Right Side Slope 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) Bottom Width 5.00 ft Discharge 22.75 ft'/s Results Normal Depth 0.84 ft Flow Area 6.36 ft2 Wetted Perimeter 10.34 ft Top Width 10.06 ft Critical Depth 0.74 ft Critical Slope 0.02631 ft/ft Velocity 3.58 ft/s Velocity Head 0.20 ft Specific Energy 1.04 ft Froude Number 0.79 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 0.84 ft Critical Depth 0.74 ft Channel Slope 0.01600 ft/ft Critical Slope 0.02631 ft/ft Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Bentley FlowMaster [08.01.071.00] 9123/200912:43:43 PM 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 Worksheet for SWALE #3 - B Curve Project' Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data. Roughness Coefficient 0.065 Channel Slope 0.01600 ft/ft Left Side Slope 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) Right Side Slope 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) Bottom Width 5.00 ft Discharge 22.75 ft3/s Results Normal Depth 1.12 ft Flow Area 9.34 ft2 Wetted Perimeter 12.07 ft Top Width 11.71 ft Critical Depth 0.74 ft Critical Slope 0.07699 ft/ft Velocity 2.44 ft/s Velocity Head 0.09 It Specific Energy 1.21 ft Froude'Number 0.48 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input. Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 1.12 ft Critical Depth 0.74 ft Channel Slope 0.01600 ft/ft Critical Slope 0.07699 ft/ft Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Bentley FlowMaster [08.01.071.00) 9/2312009 12:43:58 PM 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Worksheet for EW#2 Outlet - Before Wetlands Discharge Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Roughness Coefficient 0.065 Channel Slope 0.00300 ft/ft Left Side Slope 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) Right Side Slope 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) Bottom Width 12.00 ft Discharge 4.59 ft'/s Results Normal Depth 0.48 ft Flow Area 6.45 ft2 Wetted Perimeter 15.03 ft Top Width 14.88 ft Critical Depth 0.16 ft Critical Slope 0.11468 ft/ft Velocity 0.71 ft/s Velocity Head 0.01 ft Specific Energy 0.49 ft Froude Number 0.19 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input Data Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft Downstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Upstream Velocity Infinity ft/s Normal Depth 0.48 ft Critical Depth 0.16 ft Channel Slope 0.00300 ft/ft Critical Slope 0.11468 ft/ft Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Bentley FlowMaster [08.01.071.00) 11/9/200911:58:24 AM 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 1 Worksheet for Swale #3 - Before Wetlands Discharge Project Description Friction Method Manning Formula Solve For Normal Depth Input Data Roughness Coefficient 0.065 Channel Slope 0.00300 ft/ft 1 Left Side Slope 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) Right Side Slope 3.00 ft/ft (H:V) Bottom Width 30.00 ft Discharge 22.75 ft'/s Results N ormal Depth 0.73 ft Flow Area 23.52 ft= ' Wetted Perimeter 34.62 ft Top Width 34.38 ft Critical Depth 0.26 ft ' Critical Slope 0.09772 ft/ft Velocity 0.97 ft/S Velocity Head 0.01 ft ' Specific Energy 0.75 ft Froude Number 0.21 1 Flow Type Subcritical GVF Input Data ' Downstream Depth 0.00 ft Length 0.00 ft Number Of Steps 0 GVF Output Data Upstream Depth 0.00 ft ' Profile Description Profile Headloss 0.00 ft ' Downstream Velocity Upstream Velocity Infinity Infinity ft/s ft/s Normal Depth 0.73 ft Critical Depth 0.26 ft ' Channel Slope 0.00300 ft/ft Critical Slope 0.09772 ft/ft Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Solution Center Bentley FlowMaster [08.01.071.00] 1 11/9/200911:58:28 AM 27 Slemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 Permit Number: (to be provided by DWQ) OF W ATF9 NCDENR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM 401 CERTIFICATION APPLICATION FORM GRASSED SWALE SUPPLEMENT This form must be filled out, printed and submitted. The Required Items Checklist (Part 111) must also be filled out, printed and submitted along with all of the required information. I. PROJECT INFORMATION' ' Project name Pilot Lions Park Contact name Mark Breen Phone number (704)521-9880 ' Date September 14, 2009 Drainage area number #1 Ill.< DESIGN INFORMATION Site Characteristics Drainage area 317,988.00 ftz Impervious area 112,385.00 ftZ Percent impervious 35.3%% Design rainfall depth 1.00 inch Peak Flow Calculations 10-yr storm runoff depth in 10-yr storm intensity 4.47 in/hr Post-development 10-yr storm peak flow 22.75 ft3/sec Velocity Maximum non-erosive velocity (peak 10-year storm) 5.00 ft/sec Soil characteristics (enter "x" below) Sand/silt (easily erodible) x Clay mix (erosion resistant) Grass Type (enter "x" below) Bermuda x Tall fescue Bahiagrass Kentucky bluegrass Grass-legume mixture Swale type: Fill out one of the options below: Option 1: Curb Outlet Swale: Y (Y or N) Maximum velocity 5.00 Side slopes 3.00 :1 Swale length 175.00 ft Option 2: Swale Seekinq Pollutant Credit ("For-Credit' Swale): N (Y or N) Maximum velocity for 10-yr storm ft/sec Side slopes :1 Swale length ft OK Insufficient side slopes. Max is 5:1. OK 3:1 nD1 SLopYS 1 a ? l ? No i A"???yl,cl6 r6R U2r-501T, ' Lam' Form SW401-Grassed Swale-Rev.4 Parts I and II. Project Design Summary, Page 1 of 2 1 ' Swale Characteristics Swale Shape: Enter an Y in the appropriate cell below: Trapezoidal Parabolic V-shaped ' Width of the bottom of the swale Width of the top of the swale Additional Information Is the swale sized for all runoff from ultimate build-out? Is the BMP located in a proposed drainage easement with a recorded access easement to a public Right of Way (ROW)? What is the distance from the bottom of the swale to the SHWT? What is the ground level elevation? What is the elevation of the bottom of the swale? What is the SHWT elevation? ' What is the longitudinal slope of the swale? What is the depth of freeboard? r 1 l 1 1 Form SW401-Grassed Swale-Rev.4 15.00 ft 35.00 ft Permit Number. (to be provided by DWQ) Y (Y or N) OK N (Y or N) Insufficient ROW location. u.vu n fmsl fmsl fmsl 0.02% OK 4.00 ft OK Parts I and II. Project Design Summary, Page 2 of 2 Culvert Calculator Report Driveway Entrance Solve For: Headwater Elevation l C t S , ver ummary u Allowable HW Elevation 342.00 ft Headwater Depth/Height 0.77 Computed Headwater Elevi 340.46 ft Discharge 2.34 cfs Inlet Control HW Elev. 340.38 ft Tailwater Elevation 339.00 ft ' Outlet Control HW Elev. 340.46 ft Control Type Outlet Control ' Grades Upstream Invert 339.50 ft Downstream Invert 339.00 ft Length 96.00 ft Constructed Slope 0.005208 ft/ft ' Hydraulic Profile Profile M2 Depth, Downstream 0.61 ft Slope Type Mild Normal Depth 0.63 ft Flow Regime Subcritical Critical Depth 0.61 ft ' Velocity Downstream 3.92 ft/s Critical Slope 0.005642 ft/ft Section , Section Shape Circular Mannings Coefficient 0.013 Section Material Concrete Span 1.25 ft Section Size 15 inch Rise 1.25 ft Number Sections 1 Outlet Control Properties ' Outlet Control HW Elev. 340.46 ft Upstream Velocity Head 0.22 ft Ke 0.50 Entrance Loss 0.11 ft Inlet Control Properties Inlet Control HW Elev. 340.38 ft Flow Control N/A ' Inlet Type Square edge w/headwall Area Full 1.2 ft2 K 0.00980 HDS 5 Chart 1 M 2.00000 HDS 5 Scale 1 C 0.03980 Equation Form 1 ' Y 0.67000 Title: Pilot Lions Park Project Engineer: tristant j:\...\storm\3043-driveway culve rt 9-15-09.cvm Site Solutions I nc CulvertMaster v3.1 [03.01.010.00] 09/23/09 04:19:18cFaantley Sy stems, Inc. Hae stad Methods Solution Center Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 1 , i 1 V. Neuse River Nutrient Calculations Total Nitrogen and Total ' Phosphorus Loading Calculations 1 1 1 u u 1 1 1 1 1 i Neuse Stormwater Rule 15A NCAC 28.0235 Neuse River Basin: Last Modified 9/1512009 includes Vxtora, Henaerson, Kocky Mount and Tarboro as well as rranklm, Nash and Edgecome Counties Total Nitrogen and Total Phosphorus Loading Calculation Worksheet (Automated) Project Name: Pilot Lions Park (3043) Date: 911412009 By: TMT Checked By: Directions (same for pre-development and post-development tables): > Enter the acres of each type of land cover in the green boxes. The spreadsheet will calculate all of the values in light blue. > Compare total areas of development in pre- and post- tables for consistency (bottom of column (2)), and also for consistency with the site plans. If all of these values are not the same, there is an error that must be corrected. > Unless drainage onto the development from offsite is diverted around or through the site, offsite catchment area draining in must be included in the acreaee values and treated. 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.55 its sA? 2.60 0.29 1.95 0.00 1.42 14.21 4.23 0.00 2.04 0.00 0.94 0.00 Alo :..:$ 14.50 T?Bi Cveff: 0.79 0.01 18.38 ?'ylSeo??a??Co?er? lea i ai#ioi i erif ias '. [tat 1.43 1.43 1.43 1.43 0.12 18.38 2.60 1.95 1.42 0.95 T. . = {tbl!yr: (?M/arl?r?a 8.01 0.00 33.00 0.00 41.01 2.23 0.19 0.11 0.28 0.14 0.50.58 0.00 6.51 0.00 7.09 0.39 Note: The nutrient loading goals are 3.6 lb/ac/yr for TN. If the post-development nutrient loading is below these levels, then no BMP is necessary. Otherwise, the next worksheet calculates post-development TN and TP loadings after BMPs are installed. :l4fk 0.19 0.02 0.11 0.00 0.28 2.80 1.23 0.00 0.62 0.00 0.14 0.00 ~?)E1'x0 i4 2.82 T.Lk F?ij?io?ff 0.15. t 1 Fl 1 1 1 1 1 ? VI. Composite Drainage Area Maps i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1