HomeMy WebLinkAbout20061579 Ver 1_Application_20061002n fa
~ ~~
.~~~~.
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
o~
~~/~n,,
DST U!/
o ®~
S,yN~ T~irk~u f~j'
~Mw`41~Re
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ~,,,~,
MICHAEL F. EASLEY LYNDO TIPPETT
GOVERNOR SECRETARY
September 27, 2006
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Regulatory Field Office
Post Office Box 1000
Washington, NC 27889-1000 O ~! ~ ~ _.
(~
~
-
5? ~~
Attention: Mr. William Wescott
NCDOT Coordinator
Dear Sir:
p n Subject: Nationwide 23 Permit Application and Neuse River Buffer Authorization,
z for the proposed replacement of Bridge 74 on SR 1615 over Branch Upper Broad
O Creek (Morgan Swamp) in Craven County. Federal Aid ~'roject No. BRST
~ I
1615(2), State Project No. 8.2171301, TIP No. B-4088. ~1 ~~j~ ?j~--r [
Please find enclosed the permit drawings, Categorical Exclusion (CE) Action Classification
Form, Natural Resource Technical Report (NRTR) Executive Summary, and half-size plan sheets
C for the above referenced project. The North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
proposes to replace existing Bridge No. 74 on SR 1615 over Branch Upper Broad Creek (Morgan
Swamp) in Craven County. The project involves replacement of the existing bridge structure
with a 90-foot bridge at approximately the same location and roadway elevation of the existing
structure using top-down construction. Permanent impacts will consist of 0.04-acre to surface
waters, 0.12-acre of to wetlands adjacent to Morgan Swamp, and 8,842 ftz of riparian buffer.
Traffic will be detoured off-site along surrounding roads, during construction.
Impacts to Waters of the United States
General Description: The project is located in the Neuse River Basin (Hydrologic Unit
03020102). A best usage classification of "C SW NSW" has been assigned to Morgan Swamp
[DWQ Index # 03-04-10]. Neither High Quality Waters (HQW), Water Supplies (WS-I:
undeveloped watersheds or WS-II: predominately undeveloped watersheds), listed Section
303(d) impairments, nor Outstanding Resource Waters (ORW) occur within 1.0 mile (1.6 km) of
project study area. Morgan Swamp is not designated as a North Carolina Natural or Scenic River,
or as a National Wild and Scenic River.
Permanent Impacts: Morgan Swamp and its adjacent wetlands will be impacted by the proposed
project. Construction of the proposed project will result in permanent impacts, including 0.08-
acre of fill, 0.03-acre of mechanized clearing, and 0.04-acre of impacts to surface water (see
permit drawings).
MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: 919-733-3141 LOCATION:
NC DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FAX: 919-733-9794 TRANSPORTATION BUILDING
PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 'I SOUTH WILMINGTON STREET
1546 MAIL SERVICE CENTER WEBSITE: WWW.NCDOT.ORG RALEIGH NC
RALEIGH NC 27699-1548
Temporary Impacts: Construction of the proposed project will result in 0.12-acre of temporary
impacts to wetlands from hand-clearing activities (see permit drawings).
Utility Impacts: No impacts to jurisdictional resources will occur due to relocation of utilities in
the project area. Existing utility lines are in conflict with the proposed project; however, all
utility work will be conducted in upland areas and existing road fill. The existing 6-inch PVC
and ductile iron water line will be replaced by means of open-cut in the existing and proposed
road fill and will not impact wetlands or buffer zones. All telephone and electrical lines will be
replaced via directional drill method from upland to upland, and existing buried lines will be
abandoned in place.
Neuse River Basin Buffer Rules
This project is located in the Neuse River Basin; therefore, the regulations pertaining to the
buffer rules apply. There will be a total of 6,638 ftz of impacts to riparian buffers. This includes
2,499 ft2 (2,400 ft2 in Zone 1 and 99 ftZ in Zone 2) due to the bridge crossing. According to the
buffer rules, bridges are allowable. Uses designated as allowable may proceed within the
riparian buffer provided that there are no practical alternatives to the requested use pursuant to
Item (8) of this Rule. In addition, 6,343 ftZ (4,440 ftZ in Zone 1 and 1,903 ftZ in Zone 2) of
impacts will occur from approach fill and mechanized clearing activities. According to the buffer
rules, road crossings greater than 150 feet, are allowable with mitigation. Uses designated as
allowable with mitigation may proceed within the riparian buffer provided that there are no
practical alternatives to the requested use pursuant to Item (8) of this Rule and an appropriate
mitigation strategy has been approved pursuant to Item (10) of this Rule. All practicable
measures to minimize impacts within buffer zones were followed. These uses require written
authorization from the Division of Water Quality.
Bridge Demolition
The existing bridge is a four-span structure consisting of a concrete deck on timber joists with an
asphalt-wearing surface. The substructure is composed of timber caps on timber piles. The
bridge can be removed without dropping components into Waters of the United States during
construction. Best Management Practices for Bridge Demolition and Removal will be followed
to avoid any temporary fill from entering Waters of the United States. During project
development, the NC Division of Marine Fisheries (DMF) recommended an in-water work
moratorium for anadromous fish between February 15 and June 30.
Federally Protected Species
As of April 27, 2006 the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) has listed six federally
protected species for Craven County (see Table 1). A biological conclusion of "no effect"
remains valid for each species due to lack of suitable habitat. A biological conclusion is not
required for the American alligator due to its designation of Threatened (due to similarity of
appearance). No species have been added or deleted from the list since the completion of the CE
(March 31, 2004).
NCDOT T/P B-4088 Page 2 of 4
Table 1. Federally protected species of Craven Countv.
Scientific Name Common Name Federal
Status Survey Notes Biological
Conclusion
Alli ator mississi iensis American alli ator T(S/A) N/A N/A
Haliaeetus leucoc•e halus• Bald ea le T(PFD) No Habitat No Effect
Dermochel s coriacea Leatherback sea turtle E No Habitat No Effect
Trichechus manatus West Indian Manatee E No Habitat No Effect
Picoides borealis Red-cockaded wood ecker E No Habitat No Effect
Aesch nomene virginica Sensitive 'oint-vetch T No Habitat No Effect
(E) -Endangered T(S/A) - "Similarity of Appearance"
(T) -Threatened T(PFD) - "Proposed for Delisting".
Avoidance and Minimization
Avoidance examines all appropriate and practicable possibilities of averting impacts to "Waters
of the United States". Due to the presence of surface waters and wetlands within the project
study area, avoidance of all impacts is not possible. The NCDOT is committed to incorporating
all reasonable and practicable design features to avoid and minimize jurisdictional impacts.
Minimization measures were incorporated as part of the project design these included:
• Use of an off-site detour during construction.
• Construction of a 21-foot longer bridge
• The new structure will have only one bent in Morgan Swamp.
• Best Management Practices will also be utilized during demolition of the existing
bridge and construction of the new bridge.
Mitigation
The North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (EEP) will assume responsibility for satisfying the federal Clean Water Act
compensatory mitigation requirements for the unavoidable impacts to 0.12-acre of wetlands and
3,787 ftz of riparian buffer. A copy of the EEP Acceptance Letter, dated August 28, 2006, is
attached.
Regulatory Approvals
Section 404 Permit: All aspects of this project are being processed by the Federal Highway
Administration as a "Categorical Exclusion" in accordance with 23 CFR 771.115(b). The
NCDOT requests that these activities be authorized by a Nationwide Permit 23 (FR number 10,
pages 2020-2095, January 15, 2002).
Section 401 Certification: We anticipate 401 General Water Quality Certification number 3403
will apply to this project. All general conditions of the Water Quality Certifications will be met.
Therefore, in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H, Section .0500(a) and 15A NCAC 2B.0200, we are
providing copies of this application to the North Carolina Department of Environmental and
Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality for their review.
Neuse River Basin Buffer Authorization: NCDOT requests that the NC Division of Water
Quality review this application and issue a written approval for a Neuse River Riparian Buffer
Authorization.
NCDOT T/P B-4088 Page 3 of 4
CAMA: According to attached email dated July 23, 2003 from NCDCM, the project site does not
fall under NCDCM jurisdiction.
A copy of this application will be posted on the NCDOT website at:
http://www.doh.dot. state. nc.us/preconstruct/pe/neu/permit. html
Thank you for your time and assistance with this project. Please contact Tyler Stanton at
tstanton@dot.state.nc.us or (919) 715-1439 if you have any questions or need additional
information.
Sincerely,
~~
Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Environmental Management Director, PDEA
Cc:
W/attachment:
Mr. John Hennessy, NCDWQ (5 Copies)
Mr. Travis Wilson, NCWRC
Mr. Gary Jordan, USFWS
Mr. Ron Sechler, NMFS
Mr. Michael Street, NCDMF
Mr. Steve Sollod, NCDCM
Ms. Tere Barrett, District Manager, NCDCM
Dr. David Chang, P.E., Hydraulics
Mr. Greg Perfetti, P.E., Structure Design
Mr. Mark Staley, Roadside Environmental
Mr. C. E. Lassiter, P.E., Division 2 Engineer
Mr. Jay Johnson, Division 2 Environmental Officer
W/o attachment
Mr. Scott McLendon, USACE, Wilmington
Mr. Jay Bennett, P.E., Roadway Design
Mr. Majed Alghandour, P. E., Programming and TIP
Mr. Art McMillan, P.E., Highway Design
Ms. Beth Harmon, EEP
Mr. Todd Jones, NCDOT External Audit Branch
Mr. Bill Goodwin, P.E., PDEA
NCDOT T/P B-4(188 Page 4 of 4
Office Use Only: Form Version March OS
9
USACE Action ID No. DWQ No. ~ ~ ~~ ~'
~u any pamcwar item ~s not applicable to this project, please enter "Not Applicable" or "N/A".)
I. Processing
1. Check all of the approval(s) requested for this project:
® Section 404 Permit ® Riparian or Watershed Buffer Rules
^ Section 10 Permit ^ Isolated Wetland Permit from DWQ
® 401 Water Quality Certification ^ Express 401 Water Quality Certification
2. Nationwide, Regional or General Permit Number(s) Requested: NW 23
3. If this notification is solely a c urtesy copy because written approval for the 401 Certification
is not required, check here:
4. If payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program (NCEEP) is proposed
for mitigation of impacts, attach the acceptance letter from NCEEP, complete section VIII,
and check here:
5. If your project is located in any of North Carolina's twenty coastal counties (listed on page
4), and the project is within a North Carolina Division of Coastal Management Area of
Environmental Concern (see the top of page 2 for further details), check here:
II. Applicant Information
1. Owner/Applicant Information
Name: _ Gregory J. Thorpe PhD Environmental Management Director
Mailing Address: 1598 Mail Service Center
Raleigh NC
Telephone Number: (919) 733-3141 Fax Number: (919) 733-9794
E-mail Address:
2. Agent/Consultant Information (A signed and dated copy of the Agent Authorization letter
must be attached if the Agent has signatory authority for the owner/applicant.)
Name:
Company Affiliation:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
E-mail Address:
Fax Number:
Page 1 of 9
III. Project Information
Attach a vicinity map clearly showing the location of the property with respect to local
landmarks such as towns, rivers, and roads. Also provide a detailed site plan showing property
boundaries and development plans in relation to surrounding properties. Both the vicinity map
and site plan must include a scale and north arrow. The specific footprints of all buildings,
impervious surfaces, or other facilities must be included. If possible, the maps and plans should
include the appropriate USGS Topographic Quad Map and NRCS Soil Survey with the property
boundaries outlined. Plan drawings, or other maps may be included at the applicant's discretion,
so long as the property is clearly defined. For administrative and distribution purposes, the
USACE requires information to be submitted on sheets no larger than 11 by 17-inch format;
however, DWQ may accept paperwork of any size. DWQ prefers full-size construction
drawings rather than a sequential sheet version of the full-size plans. If full-size plans are
reduced to a small scale such that the final version is illegible, the applicant will be informed that
the project has been placed on hold until decipherable maps are provided.
Name of project:
2. T.I.P. Project Number or State Project Number (NCDOT Only): B-4088
3. Property Identification Number (Tax PIN): N/A
4. Location
County: Craven Nearest Town: New Bern
Subdivision name (include phase/lot number): N/A
Directions to site (include road numbers/names, landmarks, etc.):
5. Site coordinates (For linear projects, such as a road or utility line, attach a sheet that
separately lists the coordinates for each crossing of a distinct waterbody.)
Decimal Degrees (6 digits minimum): -77.0025 °N 35.1772 °W
6. Property size (acres): N/A
7. Name of nearest receiving body of water: Moran Swamp
8. River Basin: Neuse
(Note -this must be one of North Carolina's seventeen designated major river basins. The
River Basin map is available at http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/admin/mansl.)
9. Describe the existing conditions on the site and general land use in the vicinity of the project
at the time of this application: Rural with forested areas and scattered residential and
farms.
Page 2 of 9
10. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
Replacement of the existing bridge structure with a 90-foot bridge at approximately the same
location and roadway elevation of the existing_structure using top-down construction.
11. Explain the purpose of the proposed work:__ The bridge is considered to be structurally
deficient and functionally obsolete and the replacement will result in safer traffic operations
IV. Prior Project History
If jurisdictional determinations and/or permits have been requested and/or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases of the same subdivision) in the past, please explain. Include
the USACE Action ID Number, DWQ Project Number, application date, and date permits and
certifications were issued or withdrawn. Provide photocopies of previously issued permits,
certifications or other useful information. Describe previously approved wetland, stream and
buffer impacts, along with associated mitigation (where applicable). If this is a NCDOT project,
list and describe permits issued for prior segments of the same T.I.P. project, along with
construction schedules. N/A
V. Future Project Plans
Are any future permit requests anticipated for this project? If so, describe the anticipated work,
and provide justification for the exclusion of this work from the current application.
VI. Proposed Impacts to Waters of the United States/Waters of the State
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
wetlands, open water, and stream channels associated with the project. Each impact must be
listed separately in the tables below (e.g., culvert installation should be listed separately from.
riprap dissipater pads). Be sure to indicate if an impact is temporary. All proposed impacts,
permanent and temporary, must be listed, and must be labeled and clearly identifiable on an
accompanying site plan. All wetlands and waters, and all streams (intermittent and perennial)
should be shown on a delineation map, whether or not impacts are proposed to these systems.
Wetland and stream evaluation and delineation forms should be included as appropriate.
Photographs may be included at the applicant's discretion. If this proposed impact is strictly for
wetland or stream mitigation, list and describe the impact in Section VIII below. If additional
space is needed for listing or description, please attach a separate sheet.
Page 3 of 9
1. Provide a written description of the proposed impacts: approach fill, hand clearing,
mechanized clearing
2. Individually list wetland impacts. Types of impacts include, but are not limited to
mechanized clearing, grading, fill, excavation, flooding, ditching/drainage, etc. For dams,
separately list impacts due to hcth ctn~ctnrP and flnnrlinu
Wetland Im act
P
Site Number
(indicate on map)
Type of Impact T
ype of Wetland
(e.g., forested, marsh,
herbaceous, bog, etc.) Located within
100-year
Floodplain
( es/no) Distance to
Nearest
Stream
(linear feet) Area of
Impact
(acres)
17+62 to 24+35-L- Permanent Fill Forested/Riverine Yes 0.08
17+62 to 24+35-L- Mechanized Clearing Forested/Riverine Yes 0.03
17+62 to 24+35-L- Hand Clearing Forested/Riverine Yes 0.12
Total Wetland Impact (acres) 0.23
3. List the total acreage (estimated) of all existing wetlands on the property: N/A
4. Individually list all intermittent and perennial stream impacts. Be sure to identify temporary
impacts. Stream impacts include, but are not limited to placement of fill or culverts, dam
construction, flooding, relocation, stabilization activities (e.g., cement walls, rip-rap, crib
walls, gabions, etc.), excavation, ditching/straightening, etc. If stream relocation is proposed,
plans and profiles showing the linear footprint for both the original and relocated streams
must be included. To calculate acreage, multiply length X width, then divide by 43,560.
Stream Impact
Number
(indicate on map)
Stream Name
Type of Impact
Perennial or
Intermittent? Average
Stream Width
Before Im act Impact
Len th
g
(linear feet) Area of
Im act
p )
(acres
N/A
Total Stream Impact (by length and acreage) 0 0
Page 4 of 9
5. Individually list all open water impacts (including lakes, ponds, estuaries, sounds, Atlantic
Ocean and any other water of the U.S.). Open water impacts include, but are not limited to
fill, excavation, dredging, flooding, drainage, bulkheads, etc.
Open Water Impact
Site Number
indicate on ma
(~ p)
Name of Waterbody
(if applicable)
Type of Impact Type of Waterbody
(lake, pond, estuary, sound, bay,
ocean, etc.) Area of
Impact
)
(acres
17+62 to 24+35-L- Morgans Swamp Fill Impounded Creek 0.04
17+62 to 24+35-L- Morgans Swamp Bent Creek 0.00
Total Open Water Impact (acres) 0.04
6. List the cumulative impact to all Waters of the U.S. resulting from the project:
Stream Impact (acres): 0.0
Wetland Impact (acres): 0.23
Open Water Impact (acres): 0.04
Total Impact to Waters of the U.S. (acres) 0.27
Total Stream Impact (linear feet): 0
7. Isolated Waters
Do any isolated waters exist on the property? ^ Yes ®No
Describe all impacts to isolated waters, and include the type of water (wetland or stream) and
the size of the proposed impact (acres or linear feet). Please note that this section only
applies to waters that have specifically been determined to be isolated by the USACE.
N/A
8. Pond Creation
If construction of a pond is proposed, associated wetland and stream impacts should be
included above in the wetland and stream impact sections. Also, the proposed pond should
be described here and illustrated on any maps included with this application.
Pond to be created in (check all that apply): ^ uplands ^ stream ^ wetlands
Describe the method of construction (e.g., dam/embankment, excavation, installation of
draw-down valve or spillway, etc.): N/A
Proposed use or purpose of pond (e.g., livestock watering, irrigation, aesthetic, trout pond,
local stormwater requirement, etc.):
Current land use in the vicinity of the pond:
Size of watershed draining to pond: Expected pond surface area:
VII. Impact Justification (Avoidance and Minimization)
Specifically describe measures taken to avoid the proposed impacts. It may be useful to provide
information related to site constraints such as topography, building ordinances, accessibility, and
financial viability of the project. The applicant may attach drawings of alternative, lower-impact
site layouts, and explain why these design options were not feasible. Also discuss how impacts
were minimized once the desired site plan was developed. If applicable, discuss construction
Page 5 of 9
techniques to be followed during construction to reduce impacts. Use of an off-site detour
during construction, construction of a 21-foot lon er single-span bridge Best Management
Practices will also be utilized during demolition of the existing bridge and construction of the
new bridue.
VIII. Mitigation
DWQ - In accordance with 15A NCAC 2H .0500, mitigation. may be required by the NC
Division of Water Quality for projects involving greater than or equal to one acre of impacts to
freshwater wetlands or greater than or equal to 150 linear feet of total impacts to perennial
streams.
USACE - In accordance with the Final Notice of Issuance and Modification of Nationwide
Permits, published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2002, mitigation will be required when
necessary to ensure that adverse effects to the aquatic environment are minimal. Factors
including size and type of proposed impact and function and relative value of the impacted
aquatic resource will be considered in determining acceptability of appropriate and practicable
mitigation as proposed. Examples of mitigation that may be appropriate and practicable include,
but are not limited to: reducing the size of the project; establishing and maintaining wetland
and/or upland vegetated buffers to protect open waters such as streams; and replacing losses of
aquatic resource functions and values by creating, restoring, enhancing, or preserving similar
functions and values, preferable in the same watershed.
If mitigation is required for this project, a copy of the mitigation plan must be attached in order
for USACE or DWQ to consider the application complete for processing. Any application
lacking a required mitigation plan or NCEEP concurrence shall be placed on hold as incomplete.
An applicant may also choose to review the current guidelines for stream restoration in DWQ's
Draft Technical Guide for Stream Work in North Carolina, available at
http://h2o. enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/strm~;ide.html.
1. Provide a brief description of the proposed mitigation plan. The description should provide
as much information as possible, including, but not limited to: site location (attach directions
and/or map, if offsite), affected stream and river basin, type and amount (acreage/linear feet)
of mitigation proposed (restoration, enhancement, creation, or preservation), a plan view,
preservation mechanism (e.g., deed restrictions, conservation easement, etc.), and a
description of the current site conditions and proposed method of construction. Please attach
a separate sheet if more space is needed.
The NCEEP will provide compensatory mitigation for impacts from this project
2. Mitigation may also be made by payment into the North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (NCEEP). Please note it is the applicant's responsibility to contact the NCEEP at
(919) 715-0476 to determine availability, and written approval from the NCEEP indicating
that they are will to accept payment for the mitigation must be attached to this form. For
Page 6 of 9
additional information regarding the application process for the NCEEP, check the NCEEP
website at http://h2aenr.state.nc.us/wrp/index.htm. If use of the NCEEP is proposed, please
check the appropriate box on page five and provide the following information:
Amount of stream mitigation requested (linear feet): 0
Amount of buffer mitigation requested (square feet): 3,787
Amount of Riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0.12
Amount ofNon-riparian wetland mitigation requested (acres): 00
Amount of Coastal wetland mitigation requested (acres): 0
IX. Environmental Documentation (required by DWQ)
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the use of
public (federal/state) land? Yes ® No ^
2. If yes, does the project require preparation of an environmental document pursuant to the
requirements of the National or North Carolina Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Note: If you are not sure whether a NEPA/SEPA document is required, call the SEPA
coordinator at (919) 733-5083 to review current thresholds for environmental documentation.
Yes ® No ^
3. If yes, has the document review been finalized by the State Clearinghouse? If so, please
attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval letter. Yes ® No ^
X. Proposed Impacts on Riparian and Watershed Buffers (required by DWQ)
It is the applicant's (or agent's) responsibility to determine, delineate and map all impacts to
required state and local buffers associated with the project. The applicant must also provide
justification for these impacts in Section VII above. All proposed impacts must be listed herein,
and must be clearly identifiable on the accompanying site plan. All buffers must be shown on a
map, whether or not impacts are proposed to the buffers. Correspondence from the DWQ
Regional Office may be included as appropriate. Photographs may also be included at the
applicant's discretion.
1. Will the project impact protected riparian buffers identified within 15A NCAC 2B .0233
(Neuse), 15A NCAC 2B .0259 (Tar-Pamlico), 15A NCAC 02B .0243 (Catawba) 15A NCAC
2B .0250 (Randleman Rules and Water Supply Buffer Requirements), or other (please
identify Neuse )? Yes ® No ^
2. If "yes", identify the square feet and acreage of impact to each zone of the riparian buffers.
If buffer mitigation is required calculate the required amount of mitigation by applying the
buffer multipliers.
Page 7 of 9
Zone* Impact
(s uare feet) Multiplier Required
Miti ation
1 6840 3 (2 for Catawba) 7011
2 2002 1.5 2175
Total 8842 9186**
* Zone 1 extends out 30 feet perpendicular from the top of the near bank of channel; Zone 2 extends an
additional 20 feet from the edge of Zone 1.
** Total offset by compensatory wetland mitigation
3. If buffer mitigation is required, please discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (i.e.,
Donation of Property, Riparian Buffer Restoration /Enhancement, or Payment into the
Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund). Please attach all appropriate information as identified
within 15A NCAC 2B .0242 or .0244, or .0260.
The NCEEP will provide compensatory mitigation for buffer impacts from this proiect
XI. Stormwater (required by DWQ)
Describe impervious acreage (existing and proposed) versus total acreage on the site. Discuss
stormwater controls proposed in order to protect surface waters and wetlands downstream from
the property. If percent impervious surface exceeds 20%, please provide calculations
demonstrating total proposed impervious level. See Stormwater Management Plan
XII. Sewage Disposal (required by DWQ)
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of
wastewater generated from the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
N/A
XIII. Violations (required by DWQ)
Is this site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500) or any Buffer Rules?
Yes ^ No
Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes ^ No
XIV. Cumulative Impacts (required by DWQ)
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in additional
development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes ^ No
If yes, please submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with
the most recent North Carolina Division of Water Quality policy posted on our website at
http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands. If no, please provide a short narrative description:
Page 8 of 9
XV. Other Circumstances (Optional):
It is the applicant's responsibility to submit the application sufficiently in advance of desired
construction dates to allow processing time for these permits. However, an applicant may
choose to list constraints associated with construction or sequencing that may impose limits on
work schedules (e.g., draw-down schedules for lakes, dates associated with Endangered and
Threatened Species, accessibility problems, or other issues outside of the applicant's control).
Applicant/Agent's Signature Date
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant is provided.)
Page 9 of 9
CATEGORICAL, EXCLUSION ACTION CLASSIFICATION FORM
TIP Project No.
State Project No.
W.B.S. No.
Federal Project No.
B-4088
8.2171301__
33446.1.1
BRSTP-1615(2)
A. Project Description:
The purpose of this project is to replace Craven County Bridge No. 74 on
SR 1615 over Upper Broad Creek. The replacement structure will be a
bridge 75 feet long and 40 feet wide. The cross section will include two 12-
foot lanes and 8-foot offsets. The south approach will be approximately 345
feet and north approach will be approximately 364 feet long. The approach
cross section will include two 12-foot lanes and 8-foot shoulders. Traffic will
be detoured offsite during construction (see Figure 1). The roadway will be
designed as a Rural Major Collector with a 60 mile per hour design speed.
B. Purpose and Need:
Bridge Maintenance Records indicate the bridge has a sufficiency rating of
47.2 out of 100. The bridge's four- span superstructure is composed of a
concrete deck on timber joists. The substructure is composed of timber caps
on timber piles. The bridge's timber substructure including a timber
abutment is deteriorating (currently rated 4 out of 10) qualifying the bridge
as structurally deficient and therefore eligible for FHWA's Highway Bridge
Replacement Program.
C. Proposed Improvements:
Circle one or more of the following Type II improvements that apply to the
project:
1. Modernization of a highway by resurfacing, restoration, rehabilitation,
reconstruction, adding shoulders, or adding auxiliary lanes (e.g., parking,
weaving, turning, climbing).
a. Restoring, Resurfacing, Rehabilitating, and Reconstructing
pavement (3R and 4R improvements)
b. Widening roadway and shoulders without adding through lanes
c. Modernizing gore treatments
d. Constructing lane improvements (merge, auxiliary, and turn lanes)
e. Adding shoulder drains
f. Replacing and rehabilitating culverts, inlets, and drainage pipes,
including safety treatments
g. Providing driveway pipes
h. Performing minor bridge widening (less than one through lane)
i. Slide Stabilization
j. Structural BMP's for water quality improvement
2. Highway safety or traffic operations improvement projects including the
installation of ramp metering control devices and lighting.
a. Installing ramp metering devices
b. Installing lights
c. Adding or upgrading guazdrail
d. Installing safety barriers including Jersey type barriers and pier
protection
e. Installing or replacing impact attenuators
f. Upgrading medians including adding or upgrading median barriers
g. Improving intersections including relocation and/or realignment
h. Making minor roadway realignment
i. Channelizing traffic
j. Performing clear zone safety improvements including removing
hazazds and flattening slopes
k. Implementing traffic aid systems, signals, and motorist aid
1. Installing bridge safety hardware including bridge rail retrofit
3. Bridge rehabilitation, reconstruction, or replacement or the construction of
grade sepazation to replace existing at-grade railroad crossings.
a. Rehabilitating, reconstructing, or replacing bridge approach slabs
b. Rehabilitating or replacing bridge decks
c. Rehabilitating bridges including painting (no red lead paint), scour
repair, fender systems, and minor structural improvements
. O Replacing a bridge (structure and/or fill)
4. Transportation corridor fringe parking facilities.
5. Construction of new truck weigh stations or rest areas.
6. Approvals for disposal of excess right-of--way or for joint or limited use of
right-of--way, where the proposed use does not have significant adverse
impacts.
7. Approvals for changes in access control.
8. Construction of new bus storage and maintenance facilities in areas used
predominantly for industrial or transportation purposes where such
construction is not inconsistent with existing zoning and located on or near
a street with adequate capacity to handle anticipated bus and support
vehicle traffic.
9. Rehabilitation or reconstruction of existing rail and bus buildings and
ancillary facilities where only minor amounts of additional land are
required and there is not a substantial increase in the number of users.
10. Construction of bus transfer facilities (an open area consisting of
passenger shelters, boarding areas, kiosks and related street
improvements) when located in a commercial area or other high activity
center in which there is adequate street capacity for projected bus traffic.
11. Construction of rail storage and maintenance facilities in azeas used
predominantly for industrial or transportation purposes where such
construction is not inconsistent with existing zoning and where there is no
significant noise impact on the surrounding community.
2
12. Acquisition of land for hardship or protective purposes, advance land
acquisition loans under section 3(b) of the UMT Act. Hardship and
protective buying will be permitted only for a particular parcel or a limited
number of parcels. These types of land acquisition qualify for a CE only
where the acquisition will not limit the evaluation of alternatives,
including shifts in alignment for planned construction projects, which may
be required in the NEPA process. No project development on such land
may proceed until the NEPA process has been completed.
13. Acquisition and construction of wetland, stream and endangered species
mitigation sites.
14. Remedial activities involving the removal, treatment or monitoring of soil
or groundwater contamination pursuant to state or federal remediation
guidelines.
D. S ecial Pro'ect Information: (Include Environmental Commitments and Permits
Require .)
Estimated Costs:
Total Construction $ 675,000
Right of Way $ 50,000
Total $ 715,000
Estimated Traffic:
Current - 1500 vpd
Year 2025 - 2600 vpd
TTST - 1%
Dual - 2%
Design Exceptions: There are no design exceptions anticipated for this project.
Functional Classification: Rural Major Collector
Bridge Demolition: There will be no appreciable fill associated with debris from
demolition of the bridge.
Alternatives Discussion: An offsite detour will be utilized during construction
including SR 1620, SR 1617, and back to SR 1615. The average road user would
follow a detour requiring 1.3 miles additional travel resulting in a delay of
approximately 2.5 minutes. Division 2 and the School Bus Transportation
Director for Craven County have no objection to an offsite detour at this location.
Craven County EMS has firmly requested that the time of construction be kept to
an absolute minimum.
E. Threshold Criteria
The following evaluation of threshold criteria must be completed for Type II
actions
ECOLOGICAL YES NO
(1) Will the project have a substantial impact on any
unique or important natural resource? X
(2) Does the project involve habitat where federally
listed endangered or threatened species may occur? ^ X
(3) Will the project affect anadromous fish? ^
X
(4) If the project involves wetlands, is the amount of
permanent and/or temporary wetland taking less than
one-tenth (1 / 10) of an acre and have .all practicable measures
to avoid and minimize wetland takings been evaluated?
X ^
(5) Will the project require the use of U. S. Forest Service lands? ^
X
(6) Will the quality of adjacent water resources be adversely
impacted by proposed construction activities? ^ X
(7) Does the project involve waters classified as Outstanding Water
Resources (OWR) and/or High Quality Waters (HQW)? ^
X
(8) Will the project require fill in waters of the United States
in any of the designated mountain trout counties? ~ X
(9) Does the project involve any known underground storage
tanks (UST's) or hazardous materials sites? ^ X
PERMITS AND COORDINATION YES NO
(10) ~ If the project is located within a CAMA county, will the
project significantly affect the coastal zone and/or any
"Area of Environmental Concern" (AEC)? X
(11) Does the project involve Coastal Barrier Resources Act
resources? X
(12) Will a U. S. Coast Guard permit be required? a
X
(13) Will the project result in the modification of any existing
regulatory floodway? X
4
(14) Will the project require any stream relocations or channel
changes? X
SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND CULTURAL RESOURCES YES NO
(15) Will the project induce substantial impacts to planned
growth or land use for the area? ^
X
(16) Will the project require the relocation of any family or
business? X
(17) Will the project have a disproportionately high and adverse
human health and environmental effect on any minority or
low-income population? ^
X
(18) If the project involves the acquisition of right of way, is the
amount of right of way acquisition considered minor? X
(19) Will the project involve any changes in access control?
^
X
(20) Will the project substantially alter the usefulness
and/or land use of adjacent property? ^
X
(21) Will the project have an adverse effect on permanent
local traffic patterns or community cohesiveness? X
(22) Is the project included in an approved thoroughfare plan
and/or Transportation Improvement Program (and is,
therefore, in conformance with the Clean Air Act of 1990)? X
(23) Is the project anticipated to cause an increase in traffic
volumes? X
(24) Will traffic be maintained during construction using existing
roads, staged construction, or on-site detours? ^
X
(25) If the project is a bridge replacement project, will the bridge
be replaced at its existing location (along the existing facility)
and will all construction proposed in association with the
bridge replacement project be contained on the existing facility? ^
X
(26) Is there substantial controversy on social, economic, or
environmental grounds concerning the project? X
(27) Is the project consistent with all Federal, State, and local laws ^
' relating to the environmental aspects of the project? X
(28) Will the project have an "effect" on structures/properties
eligible for or listed on the National Register of Historic Places? X
5
(29) Will the project affect any archaeological remains which are
important to history orpre-history? X
(30) Will the project require the use of Section 4(f) resources
(public parks, recreation lands, wildlife and waterfowl refuges,
historic sites, or historic bridges, as defined in Section 4(f)
of the U. S. Department of Transportation Act of 1966)? X
(31) Will'the project result in any conversion of assisted public
recreation sites or facilities to non-recreation uses, as defined
by Section 6(f) of the Land and Water Conservation Act
of 1965, as amended? X
(32) Will the project involve construction in, across, or adjacent
to a river designated as a component of or proposed for
inclusion in the National System of Wild and Scenic Rivers? X
F. Additional Documentation Required for Unfavorable Responses in Part E
Question 3. Will the project affect anadromous fish?
The stream is habitat for anadramous fish. Impact from the project will be
minimized by the use of the measures included below which are repeated in the
Project Commitments Green Sheet of this document.
• NCDOT will implement Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadramous Fish
• The North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries has indicated that a moratorium on
in-water construction will be in place from February 1 to September 30 of any given
year.
• To the extent practical, construction should be accomplished without the use of
construction pads.
• To the extent practical, bridge demolition should occur without getting into the
water.
6
G. CE Approval
TIP Project No. B-4088
State Project No. 8.2171301
W.B.S. No. 33446.1.1
Federal Project No. BRSTP-1615(2)
Project Description:
The purpose of this project is to replace Craven County Bridge No. 74 on
SR 1615 over Upper Broad Creek. The replacement structure will be a
bridge 85 feet long and 40 feet wide. The cross section will include two 12-
foot lanes and 8-foot offsets. The south approach will be approximately 345
feet and north approach will be approximately 364 feet long. The approach
cross section wilt include two 12-foot lanes and 8-foot shoulders. Traffic will
be detoured offsite during construction (see Figure 1). The roadway will be
designed as a Rural Major Collector with a 60 mile per hour design speed.
Categorical Exclusion Action Classification: (Check one)
TYPE II(A)
X TYPE II(B)
Approved:
Date
.~ 3.--
Date Proiec
ect Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
- (, ! i~~
Date Project lamm~g ngineer
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
For Type II(B) projects only:
Date J F. Sullivan, III, Division Adnu
Federal Highway Administration
Assistant Manager
Project Development & Environmental Analysis Branch
PROJECT COMMITMENTS:
Craven County
Bridge No. 74 on SR 1615
Oven-Branch of Upper Broad Creek
Federal Aid Project No. BRSTP-1615(2)
State Project No. 8.2171301
W.B.S. No. 33446.1.1
T.I.P. No. B-4088
All Pre-Construction Units/ Resident Engineer -EMS Concerns
Craven County EMS has indicated that SR 1615 is a critical route. Road closure is tolerable but
its duration should be kept to a minimum. All aspects of design and construction should facilitate
the shortest reasonable duration of road closure.
Resident Engineer -EMS Notification
Craven County EMS must be provided a minimum 2 weeks notice prior to road closure.
All Pre-Construction Units/ Resident Engineer - Anadramous Fish
The North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries has indicated that a moratorium on in-water
construction will be in place from February 15 to June 30 of any given year.
Strong consideration should be given to spanning the stream completely.
To the extent practical, construction should be accomplished without getting into the water.
To the extent practical, bridge demolition should occur without getting into the water.
Hydraulics - Anadramous Fish
NCDOT will implement Stream Crossing Guidelines for Anadramous Fish
Resident Engineer -School Bus Turnaround
Prior to the Construction Letting, the Division will coordinate with school bus officials to
establish a turnaround for busses during the period of construction.
Office of Natural Environment -Bridge Demolition -104 Permit
It should be possible to remove all portions of the bridge without any resulting debris/fill in the
stream.
Categorical Exclusion Page 1 of 1
Green Sheet
March 2004
23{ ~ ~ r~
+ ~~ ~
POCOS IN _•__ ° _ 6~0 `•
22
+. ~'" 16~ •, Studied Offsite Detour
,. : `.
w.. +~ ` 205 ,•
i= ~
'` i ~
' ,, i
• •Q1..8 t1'~"" '~
126 .
..: ~i
~~ ~~ / ~ /
.~ ~.
27 `.. ~ ~a ~5; ~
~ '~ i
/ ~ ! ~ ~~ 1
„/
~ . ~ Ser~q ' t~\
126; ~ i "°°'+ "}' ~\
_ I `' ~ .`
O
44 I ~'.., ~~ '.
i• P64 ~ •, ~., '~ 74 ~
209 ~, ,~ • ~`'' ~ •.;: ~~ ~.
•• ~ ''. i
.: ~. .•: ..I 13 ~
207 'i ~ .. •.~'.~'
~~ j, 65
~ , .,
_
..: ,_._
~4
~.
~~ .ti..m o ..~
._..; -
.~ ,
~~
~'~ /
i ~
1
.may o ~ i
~ `
,'~ ,.
I J ~i~
( ~ hiY ~y
..
` Q i
0
~ ~
_
i ~ r ~~• r
~ •~ w.r.
~ 71 / ~° ~
. ~o '~ ~EVS
F
~ ~ . /
•
~0 / ~ yrr~ ~` ~ f
'~ ~~ •' NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
/E ~
~ TRANSPORTATION
~' '~; DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
~'± ,~' PROJECT DEVELOPMENT &
'~~ / ,
M1~~ ,
` ' ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS BRANCH
CRAVEN COUNTY
REPLACE BRIDGE NO. 74 ON SR 1615
OVER BRANCH UPPER BROAD CREEK
8-4088
Figure 1
s~ RFc
~ ~ ~ ~i
i ,~ =n 'L~ G
i ~ `~ G
~,z,~; rn
t- :~ r~ p O
North Carolina Department of Cultural
State Historic Preservation Ot~ice
David L. S. Brook. ?-dministrator
Michael F. Easley, Governor
Lisbeth C~ Evans, Secretary
Je&ey J. Clow, Deputy Secretary
Ol3ice of :lrchsves and History
October 28, 2003
MEMORANDUM
_ .~~~~,
~:.:rte L n_~%: ,~
Resource~,~~~,,~
~*~.~~„~~yl' tl~~
~`~:_'_ ~~ ~ ~.~~' Cyr
Division of Historical Resources
TO: Greg Thorpe, Ph.D., Director
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
NCDOT Division of Highways
FROM: David Brook a I ~~i
SUBJECT: Replacement of-Bridge No. 74 on SR 1615 over Br. Upper Broad Creek,
B-4088, Craven County, ER03-0929
On September 4, 2003, Sarah McBride, our preservation spetdaiist for transportation projects
met with the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) staff for a meeting of
the minds concerning the above project. We reported on our available information on historic
architectural and archaeological surveys and resources along with our recommendations. DOT
provided project area photographs and aerial photographs at the meeting.
Based on our review of the photographs and the information discussed at the meeting, we
offer our preliminary comments regarding this project.
In terms of historic azchitectural resources, we aze aware of no historic structures located
within the areas of potential effect. We recommend that no historic architectural survey be
conducted for this project.
There are no recorded azchaeological sites within the proposed project azea. Based on our
present knowledge of the azea, it is unlikely that any archaeological resources which may be
eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places will be affected by the project
construction. We, therefore, recommend that no archaeological investigation be conducted in
connection with this project.
Having provided this information, we look forward to receipt of either a Categorical
Exclusion or Environmental Assessment which indicates how NCDOT addressed our
comments.
www. h ao. d c r.s to te. v c. u~
Location Mailing :\ddress TelephondFr+x<
ADMINISTRATION 507 N. t3lount St., Raleigh NC 4617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC 17699-.1617 19191733-1763 •733-865
RESTOR,\'TION 515 N. Blount St., Raleigh NC 4617 `tail Service Ccntcr, Raleigh NC 17699-1617 1919) 733-6567 •715-48C
5l'RVEY & PLANNING i15 N. Bluunt St., Raleigh NC 4617 ~1ail Service Center, Raleigh NC 2;699-1617 1919) 73~-6545 •715''8(
October 28, ?003
Page 2
The above comments are made pursuant to Section lOG of the National Historic Preservation
Act and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's Regulations for Compliance with
Section 106 codified at 36 CFR Part 800.
Thank you for your cooperation and consideration. If you have questions concerning the
above comment, contact Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator, at
919/733-4763. In all future communication concerning this project, please cite the above
referenced tracking number.
~ w
Irk lip L~; _7'
MEMORANDUM
TO: William T. Goodwin, Jr., PE
NCDOT
Bridge Replacement Planning Unit
FROM: Mike Street
DATE: July 8, 2003
SUBJECT: Bridge Replacement for: # 8-4168, # B-4088, # B-4085
Preston P. Pate, Jr., Director
Attached is the Divisions' reply for the above referenced project. If you have any
questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
MS/sw
:>~ -. , ,. -- .. '.._...,',retaa~ C,t'~ qtr>r,n Carolina 26557
~r..:,r _ _-- . _ . -- - _ .--_ ~ _-'•. Interne: :~^d-rf nit
~~~
^~~
~~~ ~~~
NCDENR
_.::~ ~ rr.~ ~ ~t :~f r:r ~, ironment and Natural Resources
_ .~i~i; . ~. P.':~~:n :Fisheries
~r =,,:~i ~p~ ; _,: - - _ - `~~ic P.c/c'~:; ~.'~~'~ Post Consumer Paper
Memo
To: Mike Street
From: Mike Marshall
Date: 06/27/03
Re: Review of bridge replacement projects
The three bridge replacement projects in the Central District should be classified as
yellow light projects due to anadromous fish spawning concerns. Bachelor Creek 6-
4085, and Upper Broad Creek 8-4088 are river herring spawning areas and Mussel
Shell Creek 8-4168 is adjacent to river herring spawning activity in the Trent River
and neighboring creeks indicating it may also have spawning activity. An in-stream
construction moratorium from Feb.15 to June 30 should be implemented for these
projects. Best management practices and restoration measures should be
undertaken to minimize impacts to wetland habitats in these areas.
• Page 1
Natural Systems Technical Report
Replacement of Bridge No. 74 on SR 1615
Over Branch Upper Broad Creek
Craven County, North Carolina
State Project No. 8.2171301
TIP Project No. B-4088
North Carolina Department of Transportation
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
March 2003
Natural Systems
Report for B-4088,
Craven County
Executive Summary
Executive Summary
The following is a Natural Systems Technical Report for the proposed replacement of
Bridge No. 74 on Saints Delight Church Road (SR1615) over Morgan Swamp (Branch
- Upper Broad Creek) in Craven County, North Carolina (TIP No. B-4088).
Introduction
The proposed project will replace Bridge No. 74 on Saints Delight Church Road over
Morgan Swamp in Craven County, North Carolina. The project study azea is primarily
disturbed urban and agricultural lands and forested land. The project study area is
located in the Coastal Plain physiographic region, approximately 19 to 25 feet (5.8 to
7.6 meters) above mean sea level (msl). Two hydric soil mapping units aze depicted
within the project study azea -undivided Masontown mucky fine sandy loam and
Muckalee sandy loam, and Rains fine sandy loam.
Physical Characteristics
Water Resources
Water resources located within the project study area lie in North Carolina Division of
Water Quality (NCDWQ) Subbasin 03-04-10 and the United States Geological Survey
(USGS) Subbasin 03020202 of the Neuse River Drainage Basin. The best usage
classification of Morgan Swamp (NCDWQ Stream Index #27-106-3-1) is Class C, Sw,
NSW (NCDEM 2002). No water resources classified as High Quality Waters, Water
Supplies, Outstanding Resource Waters, or listed Section 303(d) impairments aze
located within the project study area.
Biotic Resources
The following three plant communities were found within the project study area:
Coastal Plain small stream swamp, Coastal Plain mixed pine/hardwood forest, and
agriculturaUdisturbed lands. The table that follows shows the acreage of the plant
communities within the project study area.
Natural Systems
Report for B-4088,
Craven County
Executive Summary
List of Plant Communities
Community Area
Coastal Plain Small Stream Swamp 7.3 acres (3.0 ha)
Coastal Plain Mixed Pine/Hardwood Forest 1.8 acres (0.7 ha)
Urban/Agricultural Disturbed lands 32.6 acres (13.2 ha)
Jurisdictional Topics
Surface Waters and Wetlands
Morgan Swamp is considered jurisdictional surface waters under Section 404 of the
Clean Water Act. Based upon the results of the field investigation, the project study
area also contains jurisdictional wetlands. The total amount of jurisdictional wetlands
within the project area is 7.3 acres (3.0 hectares). The NCDWQ rating for the wetland
area is 74. Since no alternatives have been selected, impacts to these "Waters of the
United States" cannot be determined.
Due to the potential for water quality impacts during construction, in-stream
construction moratoriums to limit the effects on fishery resources have been suggested.
The moratorium applies if the following species are supported by the stream: sturgeon
(February 1 to June 30), brown and brook trout (October 15 to April 15), rainbow trout
(January 1 to Apri115), spotfin chub (May 15 to August 15), smallmouth bass (May 1
to July 15), eastern sunfish (April l to June 30), western sunfish (May 1 to June 30),
and other anadromous fish (February 15 to June 30). A 25 foot (7.6 meter) buffer
moratorium exists relative to the smallmouth bass. Qualified biologists from the
NCDOT will assess the stream for the abovementioned species. Once the fish have
been identified as being supported by the stream, the appropriate moratorium will be
applied.
Essential fish habitat (EFI~ is defined as "those waters and substrate necessary to fish
for spawning, breeding, feeding, or growth to maturity." The aforementioned waters
include aquatic areas and their associated physical, chemical, and biological properties
used by fish and include aquatic areas historically used by fish where appropriate. The
aforementioned substrate includes sediment, hard bottom, structures underlying the
waters, and associated biological communities. The proposed project is not anticipated
to involve EFH.
2
Natural Systems
Report for B-4088,
Craven County
Executive Summary
Permits
A Nationwide Permit #23 (Approved Categorical Exclusions) should cover the impacts
to jurisdictional streams in the project study azea. A Nationwide Permit #33
(Temporary Construction, Access, and Dewatering) maybe needed for temporary
construction access if that is not addressed in the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) document. A final permitting strategy cannot be developed until a design
alternative is selected.
A Section 401 General Water Quality Certification is also required for any activity that
may result in a dischazge into "Waters of the United States" or for which an issuance of
a federal permit or license is issued. Certifications are administered through the
NCDWQ. Final determination of permit applicability lies with the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers (USAGE).
A Coastal Area Management Act (CAMA) permit is required for any development
within Areas of Environmental Concern (AEC): Craven County is one of the 20
_ _ CAMA counties in North Carolina. The AECs include navigable waters, marshes and
wetlands, azeas within 75 feet of mean high water line along an estuarine shoreline, the
ocean beach, inlets, azeas designated as inland fishing water by the N.C. Marine
Fisheries Commission (NCMFC), and azeas neaz a public water supply. A Major
Permit is required if there is any dredging or filling of water or marsh, or if another
state or federal permit is required. Section 103(5)(b) of the CAMA exempts road
maintenance within a public right-of--way. The North Cazolina Division of Coastal
Management (NCDCM) administers LAMA permits within the state. The NCDCM
will review the desiga plans and determine the permit requirements for the project.
Permit requirements cannot be determined until a design alternative is selected.
Federally Protected Species
Plants and animals with federal classifications of Endangered, Threatened, Proposed
Endangered, and Proposed Threatened are protected under provisions of Section 7 and
Section 9 of the Endangered Species Act. As of February 11, 2003, the United States
Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) identified three endangered species, two
threatened species, and one threatened species due to similarity of appearance as
potentially occurring in Craven County. The table that follows lists each species, its
status and biological conclusion.
Common Name Scientific Name Federal Biological
Status Conclusion
American alligator
- Bald Eagle
Leatherback sea turtle
West Indian Manatee
A /l ig s t o r m ississip p i e n s is
Ha/iaeetus /eucocepha/us
Dermochelys coriacea
Trichechus manatus
Red-cockaded woodpecker Picoides borealis
Sensitive jointvetch Aeschynomene uirginica
American Alligator
Threatened
(S/A)
Threatened
Endangered
Endangered
Endangered
Threatened
No Effect
No Effect
No Effect
No Effect
No Effect
No Effect
Suitable habitat for the American alligator does exist within the project area in Morgan
Swamp. A review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database
of rare species and unique habitats on December 11, 2002 has no record for the
presence of the American alligator within the project vicinity. A survey for the
American alligator was conducted within the project area; however, no individuals or
their nests were observed.
Bald Eagle Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Suitable habitat for the bald eagle (i.e., lazge bodies of water) does not exist within the
project study area. In addition, a large amount of human disturbance has occurred
within and azound the project study area. Review of NCNHP maps indicated no
lmown populations of this species within 1 mile of the project study area. No impacts
to this species from project construction aze anticipated.
Leatherback Sea Turtle Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Suitable habitat for the leatherback sea turtle (i.e., high-sloped beaches) does not exist
within the project area. A review of the NCNHP database of raze species and unique
habitats on December 11, 2002, depicts no occurrences of the leatherback sea turtle
within or near the proj ect area.
West Indian Manatee Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Suitable habitat for the West Indian manatee (i.e., sufficient depth of at least five feet
[1.5 meters]) does not exist within the project study area. The NCNHP has no records
Natural Systems
Report for B-4088,
Craven County
Executive Summary
4
Natural Systems
Report for B-4088,
Craven County
Executive Summary
of any known populations of the West Indian Manatee within cone-mile radius of the
project study area. No impacts to this species from project construction are anticipated.
Red-Cockaded Woodpecker Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Suitable habitat for the red-cockaded woodpecker (RCW) (i.e., old pine stands) within
or neaz the project study area does not exist. In addition, large agricultural fields
fracture the landscape generating boundaries that RCW do not typically cross.
Therefore, a large enough area of appropriate habitat is not located within the prof ect
study area. The NCNHP lists no documented occurrences of the RCW within 5 miles
of the project study azea. No impacts aze anticipated to the RCW because of project
construction
Sensitive Jointvetch Biological Conclusion: No Effect
Suitable habitat for the sensitive jointvetch (i.e., intertidal canes neaz the edge of the
tidal fluctuation) does not exist within the project study area. A review of the NCNHP
database of rare species and unique habitats on December 11, 2002, depicts no
occurrences of the sensitive jointvetch within or near the project area.
Surveys for these species are valid for two years from the survey data. If the project is
not constructed within those two years, the species may need to be resurveyed before
the let date.
Conclusions
The project study area contains an approximately 7.2-acre (3.0 ha) jurisdictional
wetland area. Since no alternatives have been selected, impacts to these "Waters of the
United States" cannot be determined. Nationwide Permit #23 and #33 and a Section
401 General Water Quality Certification may also be required for the project. No
federally protected species aze likely to be impacted by this project.
During replacement of the bridge, construction of an onsite temporary detour bridge,
use of existing roadways for an off-site detour, or construction of an offsite temporary
detour bridge will be required. Approximately 7.2 acres (3.0 ha) of riverine wetlands
are located within the floodplain of Branch Upper Broad Creek throughout the project
study area. If an off-site detour is not feasible and an onsite temporary bridge crosses
the riverine wetlands, a geotechnical investigation of the wetland substrate's
consolidation potential will have to be performed Construction of a temporary detour
bridge within the wetland area will potentially degrade the ability of the wetland to
function as well as it did before extreme compaction or distortion of the substrate
occurred from the weight of the bridge.
The existing causeway is comprised of compacted soils and is abutted by wetlands to
the north and south. The causeway extends beyond the wetlands associated with the
floodplain of Branch Upper Broad Creek. Removal of sections of the existing
causeway, thereby lengthening the bridge, has the potential to impact abutting
wetlands. Based on the width of the stream channel relative to the existing causeway,
lengthening the bridge will not improve surface flows.
Natural Systems
Report for B-4088,
Craven County
Executive Summary
6
5u~ject: ~UU6 Bridge Projects
Date: Wed, 23 Jul ?003 l-x:37: IO -000
From: Bill Arrington <Bill .-~rringtonLncmail.net>
Organization: NC DENR DCIvt
To: "Goodwin, William" <bgoodwin~a dot.state.nc.us>
CC: "Brittingham, \"Cathy" <C3thy.Brittingham@ncmail.net»
:ii Bill,
i finally visited all the sites in the coastal counties.
The =ollowinq are my comments for t:~e proposed bridge replacement sites:
3-3811 - No DCM jurisdiction
• B-4021 - No DC;K jurisdiction
8-4022 - 1 have received no request or_nforaation
3-4023 - Public Trust Area (PTA) and Public T=ust Shoreline (PTS) Areas
of Environmental Concern (AFC's) `:ellow light project - Access to the
=ara road approximately 50' ,:rpm the br'_dge in the north past quadrant
should be maintained
3'-4025 - ?TA and PTS AFC's. Yellow light project
along the creels in t:~e north east and north west
maintained. ~ -
9-4027 - ?TA and PTS AFC's. Green 1_ght project
H-4073 - PTA and PTS AFC's. Yellow light project
approximately 180 feet rrom the soutz east cor^e
be maintained.
~ 3-4085 - PTA and PTS AFC's. Green i_ght project
` H-4088 - No DC~I jurisdiction
3-4151 - No DC:4 jurisdiction
- Access to the roads
quadrants should be
- Access to driveway
r of the bridge should
3-4224 - ?TA and PTS AFC's. Green lghL project
3-4225 - yc DC:'! juradiction
3-4225 - `to :.C~a juradict'_on ~.
3-4228 - Vo DC:~! ;urisdiction -
3-4313 - 'Jo ~C'~ jurydiction
3-4420 - to 3r":! =lr~.sd_ction
3-4431 - ?'!'e"-. 3r~ ?"_',i r.Lr' J. ]~GCn _:h~ Jr'~'cr,-
,
3-4435 - %T=. 3r_c ?n... =:F~'~, ^.rac.• _. :n. :iri~cr~
~6?1aCl':~ _..^.F ^,C:r1CJF; `_haC :lz'l~: .~r„~ .:Cr:. _mGd~'-.. iJlr:i 3 a-Tl~-at Dt].~1~]P O[1
_^? 3dmF ~i-.nmeac Yl,'1.: '7Ud--i'/ ::~ :1 ;r+nc_! __ ;~c.rm~ . 1n!1 .5::~1:L? ~ _' ~' °_
.:.mF ,O .~:f~l~. .~C=_ .1'? f5?~1-=:. .:mc.~!: _:G.._;dr_7n, _':9 .•'sn: •'t:j3C°n~
_-anCLdn :r:G~f' Z~.'---:(3r..~if:.. ~r_ ~ir:.•ci o~~ .r~!jlnl7 C;r~. ~ ~.^..
': ;".a :)C :~~~: ~:, :~: ~: ... ..-. :r//~C~ ..C .. '~:~ if ,.1 =l:~i: ~l.i'1, _ .:=1 G:. _:!~~ •1~ in ,i'F
aatJUr br_aae Jr causeway a~Ce2a~.^.u ttia al_Jwabla _moacts -~_ the
~enaral permit or construct_nq the br~dQe Jn a new al_cnment would
:equine the 3Dp11C3t_On for a ~aM.~ mayor oer-ilt 3s weal 3s more
coordination oetween COT and OCM and additional time
to process the permit appl_cation
Thank you .or expla~n_na the process _~r this veers br,dQe scooines I
appreciate your et_orts to nest=acute ttie lists oz oro~ects we_1 _n
advance o. the comment aeadl_ne oe~_eve zest year will work more
smoothly
Hill
o stem
E a ement
PROGRAM
August 28, 2006
Mr. Gregory J. Thorpe, Ph.D.
Environmental Management Director
Project Development and Environmental Analysis Branch
North Carolina Department of Transportation
1548 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1548
Dear Dr. Thorpe:
Subject: EEP Mitigation Acceptance Letter:
~p ~
~E~F~ o
;,:,r
..:. ~ GF 6`~~~
. ` L,~~rq~~~~ ~~~
F~~~ Or y Hy
B-4088, Replace Bridge 74 over Upper Broad Creek on SR 1615,
Craven County
The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Ecosystem Enhancement
Program (EEP) will provide the compensatory riparian wetland mitigation and buffer
mitigation for the subject project. Based on the information supplied by you in a letter
dated August 8, 2006, the impacts are located in CU 03020202 of the Neuse River Basin
in the Southern Outer Coastal Plain (SOCP) Eco-Region, and are as follows:
Riparian: 0.3 8 acre
Zone 1 Buffer: 2,236 square feet
Zone 2 Buffer: 1,903 square feet
The NCDOT estimated buffer impacts in the 7-year Impact Projection Database
submitted to EEP in February 2006. The buffer mitigation required for the NCDOT's
impact projections was incorporated into EEP's biennial budget that was submitted to the
NCDOT for approval in Apri12006. All buffer mitigation requests and approvals are
administrated through the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund.
The NCDOT will be responsible to ensure that the appropriate compensation for
the buffer mitigation will be provided in the agreed upon method of fund transfer. Upon
receipt of the NCDWQ's Buffer Certification, the NCDOT will provide the EEP a copy
of the Certification along with a letter verifying the buffer impact/mitigation amounts and
RP~StDY0009... ~ ... PYOtect~ OG~ ltate I~D~ENR
North Carolina Ecosystem Enhancement Program,1652 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 21699-1652 / 919-115-0476 / www.nceep.net
requesting a fund transfer to provide the required compensation. The EEP will transfer
funds from the MOA Account (Fund 2984) into the Riparian Buffer Restoration Fund
(Fund 2982) and commit to provide the appropriate buffer mitigation to offset the
impacts associated with this project. At that time, the EEP will be responsible for the
buffer mitigation required for this project.
Mitigation for this project will be provided in accordance with the Memorandum
of Agreement between the N. C. Department of Environment and Natural Resources, the
N. C. Department of Transportation, and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. EEP will
commit to implementing sufficient compensatory riparian wetland mitigation to offset the
impacts associated with this project by the end of the MOA year in which this project is
permitted. If the above referenced impacts amounts are revised, then this mitigation
acceptance letter will no longer be valid and a new mitigation acceptance letter will be
required from EEP.
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact Ms. Beth
Harmon at 919-715-1929.
Sincerely,
~~
Wi liam D. Gilmore_ P.E.
EEP Director
cc: Mr. William Wescott, USACE-Washington
Mr. John Hennessy, Division of Water Quality, Wetlands/401 Unit
File: B-4088
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
State Project: 33446.1.1 (B-4088)
Craven County
April 18, 2005
The project involves the removal and replacement of Bridge Number 74, in its existing
location, carrying SR 1615 over Morgan Swamp in Craven County. The existing two
lane, sixty nine foot long bridge will be replaced with a two lane, ninety foot long cored
slab bridge. Morgan Swamp has a Class C, Sw, and NSW classification. The overall
length of the project is 0.15 miles. SR 1615 will be closed during construction.
The existing roadway is a two lane (nine foot lanes), eighteen foot paved road with six
foot wide grassed shoulders . The proposed roadway will be a two lane (twelve foot
lanes), twenty four foot paved road, with eight foot wide grassed shoulders. The
proposed bridge width will be thirty three feet wide while the existing bridge width is
twenty nine feet. Approximately 0.11 acres of additional pavement will be added as a
result of the project.
The following best management practices and measures were taken during the design of
the project to reduce the stormwater impacts:
1. Drainage from the proposed bridge deck will be conveyed off the bridge and
into a drainage system located beyond the end of the low side of the bridge
and outside of Buffer Zone 2. A rip rap pad located at the end of the pipe
system will dissipate the waters energy before draining into adjacent wetlands.
2. The roadway typical section width has been narrowed to the extent practical in
order to minimize impacts to the wetlands (existing on both sides of the
roadway) and to a blue line stream running along the toe of the fill slope at the
north east approach.
3. Ditching through the wetlands is being avoided.
4. The roadway typical section consists of grass shoulders, fill slopes, and
ditches with side slopes of 3:1 or flatter.
~-
~ N
~ ~ ~ r.
r~
~ 4
d
a
L_ o~-srrE n.~rnr~x ~
~,dCINI°JC~'
~~~~
N~~®T
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
CRAVEN COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.2171301 (B-088)
REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE N0.7~
ON SR 1615 OVER MORGAN SWAMP
pE4~M,~T pR~wIHf~S
G10RTH CAPOLII~J%`
,~_ ;~
__ . ~, t
`r... -"V y~--..
,_ ~
`-
- ~
~~ ~, L ~~
li I .1 ~~ .,.lip.. ~''~~' .+~....
.-
* 1 li'
.• ~- ~ ~ 4
I
I
~.. i.r., it I a
.: 1 • II 11 1 *Glw I I~ 11~ It?1 ...
,
rr I I i 11:, ' ''T I 1 . ra 1''J't_3.
.. I },II} {i, I I 11 3
~ i.-.._.~,-r.~ ~,I ,} = I-_~~~aFi I i}J I ~ , r~,'~IllriyrW :yam
i . ~ 1 i:N ~. I:IJ} ~ 'I~ i- i 'i~il!^"1r
~!~il 'i' ~ :: is , to r 3J I I:~1 ~' i l ~'Mrr
.. ;.
!~ ~: h?i!i~?:;;1:i,'.1 1 r j.l~ ; ?+. }_~il ra''aP.:.... 1..:
..is . : ~ : ~13:..
..1' r.: '1..: .( i. .:~!~'ii' ii~S.:i;" I";~?.a'~;.j?'~'1 I:~:L:~ k.
ihi:: .,. 1,::::_lijl: J ... ,~ ~ ...~J. ..
.:.: J.i ....:.:..:..:.i+" *~~ •.?3:i- 111 r _ :1:rJ i r ~.
~.:.:.r.i .:..:.~.:...
..
r.:,
:,. .:.r.:..:.r:. ,r.: ' ~ 3::.. }:ii:: sa.:::r...i:.ra:li,::..:i::. .~ _ - ~ - ::,~s ";:1
~..'.. ~~ ., 11:I~J?;: .:::1Jx-g}ti :1.1: _~.:i:c,, `'-~::i3 ,}.;31 ., a:l:l~j _~. +.,~
--- r.:~., - ..
r.:.: _. ,}, „-}:I:.:.I..r, :_3.1..:. J.,v.:.:.:.1:::.::1 _ 31.:1;.
:.:.:..,.. ':'.::,}:i::: 1 I v.r .,,.r.: ~ .Irv}:; ~!' .:1..; ~J:j9: ti
;,.: .41.:.1+;.1.~ ,:. ;. ~.;;.1 ...:: 'p'w .:.r::.;ai~ ~ Ly. '~;-, .11.r. -.:''L
~1;~-:11_...~ ..,.:!:I,:.I:1}i' ~ a.:aa;33`' 1;J3r:•.,-..... ~
:. ii:a:, ~,; .1'1 .....r...:.r.:,.:~...a:¢'rl:':Ia7.r_i:::r,..r,;!,;::w..l~~ .:.!}1!s. i.'3i!?.:. IyaiJ,!: ......
:. __.:
, ia1;1.. , !.,__,,.111;11:.}jl _ i:rJ::.: }:}.::I:i ,11.I;:riti3..i
.:: _....r:.:..:.:..
_ i,:+:..11...:.1,::i'}2:,J::1]:1}i;.I;;„•11=:c:;.r,.:.,., :;.;.r.r. _.......: I~y..,;_.:::::.:.:.:.:::.::.::
J.. .r.:;.r,. .y:~ 1 I.::v.:.:.r.: iii.F.i'}u ii.v,.::e =.I.i..v i..::. v.r.ii:'^:1 - - ......
.LI. - =!1}i}};11:jai,.!1i:;~11~;.,~:q}cj}~q;1:4'~!:i:i. .xl:~I, ';a;i1;::;dE _
J i t J 11~ 1 I i; ~ i ~ 1-ii:.. ': i~ 1~1~:11:ei i .Fij yj; i
~___.- li LI iqJ I II X111 ,,i 41 , io-~~':~? ;,. 1.19'a 1+•?~_;:~1; Ii' I
.. _ ' f 1 r33,.r::,: !?.:. i ii 1 I J 1 '.'1 '. ' ~~ ':Iaiii~: i i ii:'?:1:: Ii~ 1 , ! 1,1 L
,.~ :1::.~ ;:.:.... ~ ~...:.._. i x;11.::.,.:::;1; .. ~ I:.,:!•:I:;: r:;} 1a l:':1.: ~.i:1'I:I:I
~.... ::...r,.:..r...
I ~~ '. r1
1.: . J
,:...
I.::;.:.rg:i.;;,.:.:.::?:....:. ' :.. 'i.;:,.;;_.:.;:,.1:.r1}} 1~„ 1 j l! 11:i 11 +A1.,, j::# '` ~:.I s .; {}111}:11}j:i::i ;=::11=;:13:;:
.1 1 ~~: t ': .. r.r.::.:,..~.r.r.r„v;:,.r.:: ,::. :{.:11' 1 _}}~'' 3~.311li~N~I}=:iai: }::_~'.:.i:;. ~:
_ 1:,: ~ - '~ 1'. :.: ,.:.:.1::...... r _ r 1 -. ~'cJ11jJ~J'1_':;31:;;1111113:..:.;.:.:..
.i I i- :i~,} li•i_ v: ..i}:.:.: } i 1:1':11 ~J:11.r. 11,1:1 r ~...
3:41.,.:xr_v :+1:!11x': ' `i3:i1}-~...,J r J. ~ I .. '1a..1„ .i ...:.I..:iJ. : ai..ia.1; ~ yi;.
.:r:i:.:i: 1; .r;..,. .: .....
I iL:u.:, ..:.~,.r~.,.~.I;i.;.y: ..f.n..;.:3. .:.:I:~:!'.'~~.~1:i~J3~:E1~.'~,:!~~i:i'}i:! ''i~::ri~;;:Jd,il:i!~~~1 ~~Jij3ii~i133'.':~rdi
'a11~1 ;: 111 I• ~ 11 ;.} I ~ ;~ 1 y 11iai Ilii it ,j1 I 1:1;1::
' ~ 1 { i 113.
. :_~~c r. A. '_. .. ..:.a it ~.. ~ r._.'- +i'.. la,::::::_.:..:; ..,;, ,.. .:. •...: ....:.
NOT TO SCALE
~~~®~
~j ~ ~ DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
CRAVEN COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.2171301 (B-~088>
REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE N0.7~1
ON SR 1615 OVER MORGAN SWAMP
SHEET ~ OF 7 110' 07 A OS
-WLB WETLAND BOUNDARY
WETLAND
L
® DENOTES FILL IN
WETLAND
DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
® DENOTES FILL IN
SURFACE WATER
(POND)
T T:.DENOTES TEMPORARY
FILL IN WETLAND
DENOTES EXCAVATION
E ~ IN WETLAND
DENOTES TEMPORARY
TS -;:TS;. FILL IN SURFACE
WATER
* • DENOTES MECHANIZED
• • •' • * = CLEARING
-~- -~ FLOW DIRECTION
TB
~-- TOP OF BANK
WE EDGE OF WATER
- - ~ - - PROP. LIMIT OF CUT
- - ~- - PROP. LIMIT OF FILL
-~- PROP. RIGHT OF WAY
- - NG- - NATURAL GROUND
- - PL - . PROPERTY LINE
-TDE- TEMP. DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
- PDE - PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
- EAB- - EXIST. ENDANGERED
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
- EPB- • EXIST. ENDANGERED
PLANT BOUNDARY
- -~ - - - WATER SURFACE
Xx XXX X X LIVE STAKES
BOULDER
--- COIR FIBER ROLLS
PROPOSED BRIDGE
PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
12'-48'
(DASHED LINES DENOTE PIPES
EXISTNG STRUCTURES) 54' PIPES
& ABOVE
SINGLE TREE
. .. .. .. .. .. .. WOODS LINE
DRAINAGE INLET
ROOTWAO
RIP RAP
5 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER
OR PARCEL NUMBER
IF AVAILABLE
PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE
LEVEL SPREADER (L S)
DITCH /
GRASS SWALE
l~l `l.~® Jl
DIVI5ION OF HIGHWAYS
CRAVEN COUNTY
PROJECT; 82171301 (B-~088>
REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE N0.7~
ON SR 1615 OVER MORGAN SWAMP
SHEET .3 OF 7
11f07/OS
~~®~~~~ 1L ®V'V' ~~~sy
NAMES AND ADDRESSES
PAIaCEL N®. NAMES ADDRE5SE5
Noted This entire project can be built within
the existing right of wayo
I~T~C~®7C
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
CRAVEN COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.2171301 <B-~088)
REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE N0.7~
ON SR 1615 OVER MORGAN SWAMP
SHEET T OF 7 11 / 07 / OS
a
~
oc
°
z~
,~
~ o
I ® {D~
~ 1~3yy F
fly z v ai
m 1 ~ l1 .f~ytiy r~ O I.~ X01
\/
~ m ~
° Q
j
C ~
U z~
Wp o
® ~ ~ U "' U
~ ~ ~ O~ ~ ''
~ A °' a n H
~' ~ `~ z ~
o
/
~
I
o
l ~
o
of
of
a I
~
I a ~
01 ~
® ® ~
of
o
b
~ ~
~ ® ~ ~
I ~ ~~
I ~
~ (~ ® U
~ ~ ~
® b
~ ~
• rr
~
~
~ ~ ~ 4)
~
en
o ~ l
~
~ '~
I
"~
~ U
®
~ ~'
~ Q~
m
3 '
I ~
~ ~
Z
~
Q
~
a= zm
z = O ~ o
~ ~ O
C~
Z W
O O >
~
U
a~ caw ~
~_
~ ~ ~
U d ~
Z
N
~
~ ~ rn °
v
w
m N
Q
~ W rn ~
I ~ o
O
Z ~
O
~
N N
N
W
0 0 0 0 0 0
~ N
W
J
N m
U Q
f0 3
E ~
m Q
7
a
W
`o Z o 0 0 0
`~
~ O
N
C
.
y
V
f0
CL
~E
Z '- N M et Q
~ F ~
N O
N
Z Z
W
O ....
W ~
W
Q r
m d W -~.
W p
N
Q ,-. M ~ C7 N M
M ~ (MO
W
J
m
Q N
W
~
CO
N
M
H O v M ~ t1y ~ ~
~ v '- N N ~
J
O ~ N OOp M O ~
Q W ~ N
J
~ U Q w
^
~ N
y
Q
~
N
O O
l~
r O C
O M ~ ~
N
V N
Q
d -~ U
a
~~
a
W w w
o
~ n- x x x x
LL ~ m
~ C7
M
W ~
(A
~ O
X
X
X
X
~
~
U
O O ~ O O
_
O J J J
S
O ~ J ~ ~ ~ J ~. ~
2
Q p C~ f`O') ~ op _~ ~ Q' `_
~
~ ~
lA iy ~
+ t l!) } ~
+ ~ ~
+ N
0
0
r N O _
N N ~
N N N
N
w
N
N
~w ~ d m m
~ '~
U ~
~ m m
m `
m
~
F
J
w ~ N C7 ~ ~
~ O
~
Q
0
Z N
O
Q N
~ ~ W ~
a ¢ ~
~ m
3
z
~ `~ o
F- S
,,
U .
p ~ ~
E Z > ~
~ ~ ~ ~ 0
~
~
a
>
~
o m
a 3
U
Z
F
G~
o-
a~
a
3
c
a>
O
.
~
c
m
w
0
c
o
_
U
c
0
U
0
N
f0
3
a~
U
7
N
N
L_
O
U
m
a
E
m
a~
c
.
~
.
~
N
'D
N
L
C
D7
.N
N
N
7
U
w
o
~
N v
Z
2
m E ~
m .rn .~
~ N of ~
m +`. a~
v
Z ~ ~
~ c c v a
U .
N m o.~~
vE~
a W
~ c
~ N
m C U
W C
:. c m m ~
F- ,NmaE
~ L
WvEn
.
W
U N
LL ri. ~ ~
fD U
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Q C N
N ~,
C
G
'~~ a~ ~
0
0
~ ~~
~- o
W E
~ •-
~ a
U
Q
a N
~'
~ •
~ o ..
~ ~
U ~ ~
~
~
W v ~
~ ~ v
j,,,
a "-_~ ~ ~
~ L ~ ~ ~ O O
~U~-- o o
J U ~ ,c
~ a o ~'
~ m v
~
Z ~•~
~`°
g >
X
w
W N
a~~~
E__ ,~
F- LL ~ ..,
c ~
~ c c _
m_ i° m o
~ O
N
d
J
J
N LL
_
~~
2 V
O
c
m
a~
~ ~ a «
a
J
to
C ~
O +
N J
~
~
O
~ ~ t
v
~
N
t
r
N
«
% O ~
_
(~ Z O
I OFF~ITE DEVOUR
N]EgJ~]E I8. ~U1F1F~R
~g~ INY~f°~'
~,~u~s
~~~® ~L
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
CRAVEN COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.2171301 (B-~088)
REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE N0.7~
ON SR 1615 OV$R MORGAN SWAMP
D10RTH CAROLIfVA
it ~ j ~
d
~• `~, ~.
`'~ ® •,~
.4
_ tr
i ; .. i' ~f i X43 i
i ,_ I'
i :r li~il J.aI 1 ~' ~ ~~ ~~
ai 1aJ :~ 'ifI a -~ .. ~~
i
i:9x i, I:r~ ~i;, i t I i i f ~~ .
. J
I d 1. -
i al ;~~, 1 iJ i ~'ai:~::: i
. a 1 1 ' ~ ; i j# • a h; J;iili-i.l.:;;{.p . A
. J~ ii ,:.:, ~~.ril I1,.11da:l~:l ~i3~M i V
;.,;. "
J:iL:~:.:.ii.fa?~':;. r ~t6''li~.i~%1!:;i~i il;!ci~:;i~;i...LL..,, ... ._
_ :I:i'.i;i'ii~~.yiii7~:r':1;ii'i7~"ii :;i. id:f:!;-is€}i:.::f::;.r.:.a:. _:..;I. ~ f ~'`k~.r~} ~ ~;:
it i d li ;:;.i;::9;... 1 i 11. ; /
ii , li Ii r::.:rdds~iij:,V ~ ~ i~ ,~[~~itl:.. ') ~ - r~
~:. ~. 1
i'.,}fi:l.: a:i{t~ '. a li.r. .. i19J i.i;.;~;:e:i::": :ii. :.j.y
.. J :.:.:.r.:...,: ~ a . ~:c:.r.l.:
..;.r....a.:.:.1,..'::i:.:.r.r.:.:J.:;.r.:.rJ .~!;: r :~i:{::_ :I :.::..:.:..:.:.:.1.:.: !...:.r.:.:.:.r.:;:l.,::..::. -
.,.;...::;.:. ..... ..__r::c.... ...,,:I_r.::.~r.:.r,.:...r.:. ~:.r.~;;.:.;.;. iii ii:i:~;:::::,.;. {j
,,: _...... r
.: r..
'i 9 ':~'i:::.:t":''. .:ih'j :I;lis ;,!,~. 'i:id:!_ - -:iili.,.l..
;:. ,,:.rix1::;;EC:...,.....
:I:.:::,a:,ajila:::;a,::aa:r:; ,':;x3 ._.r.Ia. .;:;a. ~~I:ii',:;:i~~. ``
~:xr.::::a:::..a ..:.dda:i:,a;' i:::C;_iii:i;: ~. .r!'''.'i;i i,,;a -
:.,.:
, .:., :Ji;i;.;.:.y.r.
i:iaa'iiii:ivi as _ :i:ia:i:aiix 'ii~rj:ji'a'...a
,.:
:...
..r.:.::_,.r_i.:•:'i.i. .rv.l!.:•i;:++i r.r.i.:;]1i.. i.r.:i:1:Li'..
~ i:i:li. 't':la:i:;::....
ri:Ii: i:~i:i.,.:: ,.; .....ia: '':'.;,_:7a:i ;_J~:I.r„ .. .I...., ~J• ~ ,
r:.ri.,.... ~~~~~}:Iva: A:ia..:~ ;eu_I:!:l: isisl"v.:i:j:l:'~~I:i~i{?:;i:;J:;: ;i':I:i~J:l.;. ~ t:i,~
'~1;: a:' . : . '
:}:I i JI J ~ f ;' a ~ ; f 1 'i i,l~ i ~ ~i
: r.:.i -
~' -:r.L'Ji~!,ti:: :... ~ :_i ;.:~;._ ar. aa~.,;:r1q. .iir.. .,I tar .,,
q.~:;;~}7r~{:iJi o.c': ~I:L':..~: '._:r.::i~jiJ~»9~ P ..fo-; :~:.i
:.:::I..:...
,.. ,.. ,~ aa:.-:i~ 19dr,:
.' :. _. --
f '~ dl a. 1
~ ,: '~. ,'>#. f 1 ~' 1 idi~~ii i:~~i jiia j i'~;~ 1'~i'',',-~:'',~':11~
Iti 1, ~. 1,..d. ~ H a... '..111 fiJJ.:. ;, . 79aj~: i7i .:.r !i . _.::
i:ia o-.;.:,~.rd.l:.I:~.. ...L 9 };11: aa1: ..q~~r ' i i . . •
;.::i.'.::.Isr.!,. J:17~. :I i ';TEi: did~J~"~ ,:Ii;:i '±i=J:li:i Tr:
~:I. " ii~~1'A:i :;i"'a t :..rt'..ri..;?:, i::.r.r::.::::ls?.::., .:_~..
....;. 1:.:.
, .::..
r.. ..
_ !{.iA.. ~id:!:::::idJ j}ii::.r ; ~a~ .r -ai:l....'"-:i:;1;I;.::i ~.I.i.!;.~ _ `;
~~a~ ;::I.......r.r_ . m~ ...:a. i~:i::.: r,_:,:3:i: ! 1:i~:i:i:t:.:
- - ~.:j:i±.I .. .:: aJ:.:.:. ~.: .r:i:i.a:,.,:: :.,J.:.:. :.i.:.:.r,.
Ii:ia::. ::id:i:i::: ~".i: I.:'~::I:[ :I'=Ji:'.: ~. i:~ I: {';I.~ ~~c9:1;,.:.r.i~:r . ~ ;.;;.::: J ::i:li:l'pL~ L:~ ~ I:I:c 'ti.
:.:. ..
;.
:.. i.: i:l:~;, ;~.I.lii.:.l .:; :. :i~S.J.r:a:i:':!;d';'dii:l.::1: :I:4xJ~l:i ~I~:'r.~~i:li'=;:::;,1:. ~
i::,r i:;: I: d.... ; ~,~:I:Lif:~: J.":. ' i _ • .; ~~':~ ~~iai:l1=:;- ;.{•::J_.:.: .r.l..:: d:: ~~y ~~,: `'~
lij; :~.j :~.:..:.::.r::::.,.;
.u...I:J. i. ::.:raiiff. .. J.i.:.. .._ .:1J::r:JJ.:.r.r:.:;i,.....r.:.r
d: Vida +;:L:,:I . ' 1.I;i~; :i,ili:rl~1~:!.i~_+iii~ ~i~}Y:il~ iiliddddd~ i!'ii iiai:i;J:2x:
;.I..J]1t.I.;, i::i:i _ 'd;.:;.r.i~l-:vt i .i. ~ :;{.;:r.;ii __ :td.I:LIi :. :j]}!:fJ{?:r ;.r
; 'a ~ ~' •- !:L'!iri.'. a~ia'y:iaa9l:.i;a~ d;?•iLiar=': -~:Ij i;.:',a d dj ~ }, ' I ~
aJ.r:::::: d3'Ei_!:. ,~r: ~';;d1:;:p::d;?.~iad~i,l~ ai d~tr.;3;~~,_::.:;':j;d ;II. ~J_!.,Jd,;i:1.t r.arl_ ..
~>: * ~ i I~liial jJii d»i~rl~. ,1,3 d it~ ii ;,fr"~!WIi i i
drr:l:i -ji:; i i
iii:':.:: a: a:!aa:.: ~ ~, a3 ~I I i i '
.. ;.:.i.ra.r.;: ,~~; l i Yl i .'j a i f IJ a a~ J~
:. M.: '~ ' ..:ai3::.;.: f.13:,:;:'? 'irµ.a.:: ~~ ::; ~.: ~ad:r : J.; .i_ra_; _ ... , _ +; .. ~ .
_aaaaa:;:-;.:i:,J.::!'.Y!:°~.. ..... I fs~*i..:... :'ii; °.ai; i.::': ~ s.
;.::::.. J1 1 :i:'~.ii. ...: .. ,:,a~i-.~ij,,..:,;. . ,. rr~r.?.r.... 'ir 1 .~ -~. i.l, ., ;~i:l':.~iii::
.:: ,:: ai aa::.l, as :}r :cr.:... _ .i:~.:;,. {;~i~'1.~` ~ L:_:...~. + . !'_: da'd'~•' Vii; :Id~?L.~~:;; ~. ~~:ii[I:
:::! .r,.i.~.;j.:.r1-:~ia d.:.:.J_:;J.;d..:Idi '!~1' iJ:~:i:l I: d :.I. 1 "';.:.,;.
,. ..~ a:... ;.
:~: - ~ a.;sr.i:r i;l.,.y._.rJa.G :iillrid' ~i:r fJ:I~t~;1;11i:f:k=:1.. ~di•i:'~a~.IJa.;...._.:.
:. ,a:.; • :1::.
ra:.r:..:::.r..: :.
:.:,
~: a:. ' r.,;:'-..r..,d.~. ,'''~. ;:~-ii'ii:...::J~;i~,lid:li~3~1:_:i~:i:
;:,~=
I. ;.:;:i.r : ;i..: - -
: r 1 ;,,. ...:.r ..., .. :...
J-;ii i :i; r j ::.:i::.:::i3 :::.:...........:. r:: ' -:: :.I.; iai.~, i'i:ii:::
,.:
::..iJ.. r.r .;.:...:a;:;' a,::11::'i .. ,.... Ila ......::.I~:!:i:i.:.t ~ :. J:..I:::lj:,...r...r..i.,,.f.l~;.~}ja;,Ji.;'.~;=''
.:.: ...r .....::.......
.:.d.r ,. ~;.I::laa:j: ..I:::.iii~:r'.: {:::i{a:. •ia J.s~ii:id:1.'li}:;.:;:i;'.ji;:~~Idd:~'::
i
"xi.w_.:y.:.r.:. ::. ...,1 r.. t+:•r q:':i';i:r..i:ua: ,.: ,.,:I:_~s':.:;:`:pl:; ad;_~.~'..:..:;;.y ;;~;.;..
i ai
Id I J
...
~ i
..J:.:....r:a -
`_ i.. ~ J
''- r'
r.rJ..rd:: ~ :: __.. o-;; as:
n.::.,:. ..r. _..:J:....:..
,,..,, ..:..,,.r.
.r.:.:::.:;.:;.::.:.:. . ,....
NOT TO SCALE
~TI~I~T~IE If~o IBl~JI~I~1~1~ ~~~®~
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
CRAVEN COUNTY
PROJECT: 8.2171301 (B-088)
REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE N0.7~
ON SR 1615 OVER MORGAN SWAMP
SHEET ,Z OF 7 11 B 07 B 05
~u~~~~ ~,~~~~~
-WLB WETLAND BOUNDARY
PROPOSED BRIDGE
L WETLAND PROPOSED BOX CULVERT
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE I PROPOSED PIPE CULVERT
12'-48'
(DASHED LINES DENOTE PIPES
ALLOWABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2 EXISTNG STRUCTUR ES) 54' PIPES
& ABOVE
~
MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE I SINGLE TREE
® MITIGABLE IMPACTS ZONE 2
. .. .. .. .. WOODS LINE
- BZ - RIPARIAN BUFFER ZONE ~ DRAINAGE INLET
- BZ1 - RIPARIAN BUFFER ZONE 1
l'
30 f t (9.2m) ~
= ROOTWAD
- BZ2 - RIPARIAN BUFFER ZONE 2
20 ft (6.1m) RIP RAP
-~- -~ FLOW DIRECTION
~
..- TOP OF BANK ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER
WE 5
OR PARCEL NUMBER
EDGE OF WATER IF AVAILABLE
- -~ - PROP. LIMIT OF CUT
PREFORMED SCOUR HOLE (PSH)
- -F - PROP. LIMIT OF FILL
--~- PROP. RIGHT OF WAY
LEVEL SPREADER (LS)
- - NG - - NATURAL GROUND
- -P-~ - PROPERTY LINE
-TDE- TEMP. DRAINAGE ~ DRASS SWALE
EASEMENT
-PDE- PERMANENT DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
- EAB- • EXIST. ENDANGERED
ANIMAL BOUNDARY
- EPB- • EXIST. ENDANGERED
PLANT BOUNDARY
- - -~ - - - WATER SURFACE ~~~®~
X Xx x X LIVE STAKES DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
X CRAVEN COUNTY
BOULDER PROJECT: 8.2171301 (B-~f088)
- - - COIR FIBER ROLLS
REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE N0.74
ON SR 1b15 OVER MORGAN SWAMP
SHEET 3 OF 7 116 076 05I
~~®~~~ ~L ~L ®~~~~~
NAMES AND ADDRESSES
PARCEL N®. NAMES ADDRESSES
Noted This entire project can be built within
the existing right of wayo
N~~®~
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
CRAVEN COUNTY
PROJECT:82171301 (B-4088)
REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGE N0.7~!
ON SR 1615 OVER MORGAN SWAMP
SHEET '~ OF 7 l l .d 07 / 05
a ~o
o~
z~ ~
~"
~ o ; z
J
®
~' ~
~ z ~
~' A~
a
m
I
~
®
Q ~ t~
"
3 ~- ~ W
V M
i G~. ~
O
I ~ o E ? ~
r ; w
O
®
~a U
ti
w~
h
~ ~ ~ U ~ ~~
1 ° °" a ~ ~-
^~~ ~ w
a z w
~
o
~ ~
I
~
f
o
of
~I
o I
I ~ ~
°ol ~
®
® e~
~
I
o ~+ ~
~ ~
I ® ~ ~
~ ~ ~~ ~~
~ ~
~
~ ~ ~ U
~ °~ ® ~ ~
\
~
~ ~ ~
I o ~
I ~
'~ ~
m
3 `
I ~ .
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ z
b b ;
~
w=
~
~
'
g ~ z
~~ ~~m aZ
~ ~' `~ a s
G
W
O J
~ J
a o ~
~H Q o~c
vWi= ~ °"
O~ ~ !i
doG ~ 1
d~ ~ O
~ U LL
Z~ ~ ~n
in'L O `IW'
y ~O ~ N
O~ Ha Q w
O. Vf
Z ~ ~ ~
¢s
/~ o
O
~, a
~ ~ a a .~
\ L ~ d
~ a ~a ~
C3 @3
a ~
Gp C3 \1 \~
1
~3 ~ 1
11 '
d 1
I
1 I i L
I I
II I
I ` I ~
I I
~_ __
I -~. t l ~ ~
'~ ~
-,~ . ~ , .
.gyp ~ i I
~ ~ ~~ ~
~ ~ ~ I I ~~~
i i
~5d ~ ~ I ~ I I I~l
11 / / ~ ~ I,,. ~~
~ ~ ~i
Y / ~"b ~ ~ I ~ ' ~ I`
~~: ,l 1
I
SZ a ~~i ~ ~r ~ I ~ a I7
M1 \ L I:
~~~
~ / ~~
~J d
z
I\~ II
~ i i I
, I ~ I 7f
~
_~ I I I
~ 1
I
I I
~ ~ I I
I rl
~
~N '
b
I
I
~i
{~
£
-~..\~ ~
~'--
66/LI/
4s ON j
~ ~ m
a
W ~
V1 ~
Qm} ~
J J88N N
ago ° ~ °
Q~.G °
Jz ~
M
N
W
`~
~ b
s~
4'- ~
~ -ti
~~i
,~ii~.
~6~, i,.
N
I ~~
~p i I i
1
d+ I I I P
~ ~ I~
I ~ i
I~
I
I
SNOISU~Y
r
O
O
' ~ .
~~
5
~d
~,o \
~~ a
~ >
~i
a
~.... ~"
s
~ ~ ~ v1a~
~ ~ \4e
~ ~,~e
~ ~
s~ ~ ~9
f4~ ~ ~
i W°^ ~ ~~~~ ee-p~
~.~
I W ~; ~ ~ ~ ~
`~'
.ao ~ Y r
J
~~
ywW
W N ~ 'L ,L r
r
Y ~ ~
1~2~ Y ~ r
1Q r
~. ~. ~ ~ 1
~ ~
~' ~ /
~ #
\, \ er
i \ ~ ~ !
` r
y / '1
:i r
..1
~a, '~ ~ r
r
r
I•
'i J~ ~ ~ r
:& ~ ~
~a ~\
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
a
~ ~ ~ ~ r
r
~ r
~~~
~~4~ ~ ~ r
r
.~\ ~ r
r
~ r
~ ,~ ~ o
~ r
~ I
11 ~
~ ~ P~ ~
3
=~ ~ o
~ ~ .~v~=' ~~ 4~ ~g ~3i
'Y t`, NJ W W~
~~
~~0~
O
0
0
a
o
0
'c~~do caw ~p Fy~:J
5`80 900 Z-NM-BZ
y
d
z
Q'I
I
~
Z
~ es
a=
~
~
~8
~ Z
~
~ ml Z ~
~ ~ ~ ~~ a=
~ ~ ag
~ a
~i
W
O ~
J
~ Q LL
Q ~
ON~ ~ !,
n.~ LL I
ooo~
~~ U p
Z~ ~ ~
~LL
~ ~ _
N ~_ ~ N
~ _~ W
O I-~ aa. in
Z I I I
/ a
/~
0
O
\\ \\
\~ ~\ $
~~
' ~M1~ ~a .
P ~
~~ ~
~~ ~ ~
w
,9 w
SZ ~~~ii ~s~a
1° , ~ \
dY ae' ! a
~'~ '1 ,
~ ~I
(ul
I ~~
I II
1 1
I II
I ~ i
u ~
1
`
C3
1
,
~
1
~
~ 1
II 1
I I
I I
II '
~
I S
6
a )~J
I
9 I
` I I
I
I
1 I
~
I I
I
y
l I I
I II
~
`
i
y i ~T ~
I ~ I
I "\
~~
~ i I
I I ~
x~
~
~ `''
~
' ~ ~
~
f
I
al: I~ ~ ~
I,
I'
0 I I
7
I ~ ~~
W
l/1
~~ ~
~. //~ ~~
~~~J i
^' ~
W
a ~ a
`~ ~~ it is
~~ ~
~~_~
•tZ 2,a:.i~is~ ~.
e$ aNt
am
J
S ~ ~
~ ~
W ~
~~ +
N
J'~~ o O
~... W ~ ~
Wr« O
Qty ~
J~ ~
N
aW
` `~
N
.___ ~os ,
I r I ~~
I
a I~
III
I ~ ~ ail
II
I III
II
I
~~ I ~ '~~
I I I t~
~I
I
,I
~s
a~
a I.
-- ~ I
~ u
II
e
`~V\
~3
a a ,~
•. d
L
as °
~3 ~3
a O
O
~~
5
~a
~O
^\
J
v / / \]~
C3
b ~ ~.
-,., ~'~
~ .~..~~
e~
~ ~ ~a~
0.
~ \4s
~ ~,~s
~.
•~ ~,a
uQw w w
~~ '~_
~ ~ aW ~ ,R._ o ~
II a
I C of '~ y~
~ W ^~'~w• ~ w •
~~f ~ ~ /
J
4
~ W ~ ~
/
W y=j ~ w ~ /
/
y 'L ~ /
/
l ~2~ ~y ~
1Q,\ W w ~ ~
~. L/ ~ ~ 1
5.. /
~\i\ \ ~' w
~ '~ ` \ / /
~\` w w /
I
\ w
~ ~, C~J ~ /
~ /
i w w /
1
1 ~_ ~
3~ ~ ~ /
~: ,~ w w
$ ~ ~ ~ 1
1
~ ~ o
W ' M
Y ~ ~
w\ w ~
w ~ I
w
w / o
w
1
~ ~ I
~ ~ ~~
'1 ~ ~ u ~ Z ~
~~~~`' r~ LL~ ~~ NJJ
tV Yl/-R w X~1 ~~ WF NJ ~U
I"
~a~
~~
I I
I i
I I
I
I I
i
Ip
(F
I~
Iti
I
~~~nie 1 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~ I
s i~ i
,a, I
~ I
I
N Y
I
~ I~ I
FI it V ~ ^~ ~~I
~~u~
~6p•a~w.ad-
0
O
Q
~ N
O
-c~~sa~~no apFy.~:~
S°80 900Z-NM-BZ
SNOISIA311
1:6
~~ ~
N
Q
r
~ ~
~ U r ~
r
a~
~@
~~ O.
~x U
~~
~~ ~
~~
~~
~ U
w
;u
g
_~
~~
a
~~
~~
LL' g
a
~ ~~~
~ ~\N
~ ~ ~
a
~~
~ ~ ga
O W„ '~
U ~ g ~ ~
h~ P
`~ A ~ y ~
b Q'
o '~ w ~
`~ y ~
~x ~ ~+ ~
Q ~ ~ h
~ y ~ \
~~ ~
~ ~ $ `~
x ~ ±~ y ~
y~
W ~
N
4
1 ~~
~~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
.tj~ ~~,"
~ ~ ti
m " ~ U
~.~
4
~ 1~~
~ s
ors ~.
0
O
0
W
N
3
N W
W ~
G~o
H
~ ~ ~
~ m
d
N
U
d
O ~ m
W Z
U Q y
H ~
03~
_N
~o
U N
Z ~ 0
N ~ Z
~~a
W N
H U
~~
~~ ~~
~~
~~ ~~
~~ ~~
~ ~
h
h
~ ~
~ ~~
~e
y ~ o
Q~ `a N Q
~ 0
'$~,, Z~
8~ ~ `
~~a ~ ~~
$O~
~O~ ~
H
~, a ~
~ O N
A
~ ~ f
M ~ ~
o
O ~ ~
II II II
a°DO m
~ ~~o
~ ~G~
U ~ ~
°- °~ ~'
O °- °' ~
~ ~ F" a°C.
~ ~~d
~ F
o
oC N ~
C
1 .~
O
a = H ~
~~
~ u u a a a u
y G C~ O H~ ~ N
~ N ~
.~
g c
1F-,
~ ~ a
y y ~
o
U
~ ~
~ a
N N
~ h
VVV
y ~
O
u6p•US~-~pa-BSObq\~o$~wdompoo$$$$
Sb~ll 9002-21VW-FI
~' a `"
c ~ v ~
3 ~'
~ ~ T
0
S
~~ $~ ~ ~ a a
c ~ ~ ~ c
D ~ O O O
~' s s °
N~o°m^s^
N 1 ~ ,J
3 ~ ~.
o ~
~ 1
e,~ • 1
I ~~
°s~~~' ~3soa~^~+~'~a~aaa'~'oaa8'a~~oo~~,
3 c a~~ o 3 C~ '~ ~~ ~. 3` c• Q
N ~ ~
~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ c a ~ 3 g s ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ o ' ~ a °
3 c ~
o ~ ~ c'a a ~' a ~'
o ~ 3 0 ~ ~ ' ~
;' O . °-~ g' 8 g'
o g ~
~ b
hh
~i
'' I I I I I~ x I I
I I ~ ~
t~~°~ °i ~l l l l
aaC S-~y 3 y~ n~~ ~~a~.nm~ ~.~~~man n.~~i~~~n o a, o a.
~ 2 ~ a ~ ~ o ~, ~ ~. N N C Q -o 'o -~ -~ ° n o ~ Zo ~ ~o Zo e~ en ° ~, ° ~ ~ Q
~ o ~ e ~ c ~ ~ o o a- s ~ ~ ° ° ~ ° ~ a o' o ~ S Q ~
o a a ~~ ~~ $ ~vvn~ ~~s~°ss ~ ~~
a - - a
- $ 3 -'_l~ ~ -3 ~
- ~ o ~ ~~ ~3 3 ~ ~'
S °
o ~ ~ ° ° Z ~~'~,
$ ~
3 ~ ~ 3
~ ~ ~ 3,
3
S° ~~ii~~~~ ~ ~ ~ { ~~
Q ~ ,. {~
~ ~ I I ( {
IIII IIII~ ~ I
O ~ O -1 -1 -1 -1 ~ t~t p -o 'v -o 'o ~ ~ w y 'v p ~ 'o = ; ~ m
~ s ~ ~~ ~~~ ~.° ~-a ~~ ~ ~~~ a ~'a ~ o a o Z ~.
F~ ° O ~ O O -i Z ~ ~ O ~ a ~ ~ Q N * ~ O C G' ~ ~
~?° a ~$°~~$ m ~~e S° ~~ 3c~~ ~ ~sx ~~ o' ? Q
~ ~ f o
'-' s s ~~ o 0 o s ~ -e o -
g O o 0 0 o c~ °~ a ~ °~ o~ o s~= s~~ ° _
O~ c~ o~= o o ~~ ~ e ~° a e
Q ~° o° o a o' u v o a.
o ~ ~ °- °c ~ o y °
~ o a ~ C ~ tq
~ c .: o o it ~
w ~ r.*. ~
N N C a
m _`mL~ m I Q
T ~ I
I I I I I I I I I u
.. ..
m
I , I I i ,--.
I ~ I i I
N
~ gg a4~
~.a-~-~-. ~ a~ ~~> ado ~ a~ a~~ g.s ~ a, .,
~ S
N
- - s
H n
C: ~ f1 ° H ~^
m o' s FCe C
~ ° V• m
M N
~ s "'
I
m I I I x I ' I I I I ~ I ~ I
~ , ~ I r I ; I
n
0
z
rn
Z
O
Z
D
r
z
rn
rn
N
W
r
to
~.
~f
~~
h
~~
~ ~
c~
a
r-~
F~
®~
~~
®~
~~
~ ~
rn •--
o .o p
~ " c ~
2 ~ aat ~ ~ ~ ~• H ~ "' ~QD u~ ~' o'
13-M
\ AR- 0 0~ 11:37
\64088
r:
r
oa ua
ro
_sum.dgn
6/21/00
r
~
r
r
~ O T;
~~ ~ ~~
+
+
+
~
@
~~ O w w
- ~
0 0 1
-
~ ~p
u+ s
S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ +~ ~ f IoGL7IOfI arxr dt cy
W
~ w m a
t ~
> p
6
~ ~ ~
A 1~
Li N N - - 111OIA
F
>
~ 51MlCIUIE NO.
~ ~ N TO
N
w N
a N N [
~
#
D
W
QI +
O +
O u
~
~ ~ ~ $ ~ ~
~
N
~
N
TOf BEVATIDN
~
~
A ~ IN W W ~ ~~
8~ i p
O 2
~ f~
~
~
~ ~
C ~ ~
Sj
'
~ a_
w ~
O DNHI BNATgN M
~
••
~
~
••
7
{
••
p
•'
~
{
~
{ ~
~ ~
4
C
n
r
O
p
a
w
NVBR ENA7ION our
~
~ IIAR QII1[Y~L
T W pt Q1 i
~}
~ K
O N to O ~
~ O
N
I fV
U7 W
v
(JI g
L 4
U P a ~ N
0
O
~ ~~~eee
~
~
n
~
r
~~ ~
s
N N '~
O A6~ Z
O a .061
4
~
~ Y y
N N
_ `
} }
'3 g
+ +
Y
r :
~ ~
+ ;
S ~ w i
S
'v ~ i
~~ i i
H
o g g~ ~ d7f ~ ~~ C
W ~ ,~ ~ ~
~ ~ '~ ~
.~ ~ ~
s~~~ ~ ~
r ~ ~~ ~ ~
_ _ _ ~ ~ ~ Ir any o.A,+ ~ ~ ~,
~ ~
-J N
In U1 ~ ~ d d tA• SU! DRASi Re ~ ~
:V ~ ~ RGf.
LJI 333 2 ~~~
0 0 8~ ~, ~ ~
y~ ~//~J,
~.» N ~ ~ N - - r9l GdL p 11i1U aA'I fot aANK.! ~ `~--9
N tJ~i SIYICItIIi
YYY 60 n~a! 70.V > ~ ~ ~ IOTAL Lf. lOR MY
OIMWIif! S/1NL ~ ODL
f ~ X,O A!D ASDYE ~ A + D~ 7C O01.'a') •
N N 8 u.SID. NOm oa sro.NO~ !~
a w+ 1 `~J
o ~ ~
a ~ c a ~ ~ ~o~ ~ ~
a o n ~ A
C O ~ ~ "~ O ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ( ~
O ~ \ L
l
as
O ~ ID 7 a - - - -
-v ao ;;~ ~ w. sID. Neu at sID. Nas ~ ~r
+ to O ~ aL rarAL~ a rraAta srtr. Nau ~ Q®~
N n n
MD.l1TIE •A• SID. N0.17 OR Na=t
V ~/~
~ ~ O a - - - - ~ MD.L itrE T SID. SIOi.A Ot NQ27 ~ f ~~
MD.L TIfE •D• SID. N0.1f Oa a~tl '~
ALDl I#11ME WITH QRA7E SID. NOIt ~-{
MAL Fa11ME YAIH IIYD ORAl6 SDl ND.ti
S
µn I PLS~ RAAI! 1Y1111 GNi! SID. N0.24
M.Dl l-la) AI1ME VIIM 7YiD OUTS S1D. Na2t
iR SID
aw~I oS aw
a
.
. `~
7' N - - ALD.L DLSJ IWA! 1MID1 lrl'O tiATa SID. aazf
t Y N - - T.aDl SID. amss
€
O ~L
=
~S
-
LL
tl
~t¢
0
d aoeLSlm awwa flD.a s~
3 cavc oaua n •r cr. sm aan
oollc a eea er.e wr, cr. sm. aan
a a u u-trr.
rrre aww
}
M
~~ ~ ~~~
~ ~
Q O ~ TI ~ 1
~7
__
u
F t +
M o
1
g
1
r ~ 13
~ ~~
~ ~ ~~
iC .
.
>R
t ~
n O
t7
v
m~
Q a
O
m
m
~~
D
I Z
G
a~ ~~
.~T ~T
~ +~!
++ ~+ 191
~~ r~
a~ -/y
4088_rdy_p~h4.dgn
\~,r
,,~.`6 9
1~~
`\ k ,
~ ,~
h
~e
L:, i
+:
I + ~ ~~ J
~ ~4a ~
1 ~ ~ ~ ~
4 A~rrD; ~
~ mgr- 1F
1 v~~~ !,
~ p
/ n'.tpf's n ~~ O ''~
/ tngNN
Yu
i '~ ~ N ° 9s~~C a
A
~I 1F V ~ y t/GI <~ ~ ~ f
~ 7•_ ~ mm A~~~
hwil~ C 1-A-1 ~~~~
i ~."
~ ~ h ~' ~
~h9~ $pN
`~ ~~r h
~~
~ ,
ti~ ~~ aR
wow °~.$$
~ ~
M ~~ ~~_~
~~ ~ g~..
-= i-
.SY'S6~ Y9~ .
~ ~~
r
i
J V
A ~NI L
AP N. ~N
~~r.
~~
y.
>~ Cv~ • ~
\~
,~S
N
~/
~~s'a
,,
`/6
0 Q
~ a
. ~i
i;~i .
~stos ~ i
i ~
~ I II I~
III yp a
10~
I
i.SZ.BSS ~
1 ~ II I
III L_
~ I III Q~
_ ~,~ !II
i
II
o~
. I
u
III • Q
III4•-.vl
III I~
I
~ III I
^a~'~ ~ . ~ I
I II I I ^
~~ ~y I
'' I
I ~ ~ I VII 1
II111
.Ij`®
~~~ ~~y`
Y-ru y
~~
.~' '~
P~ pp
i°/ =a~ h
~~
d ~ ~ I
/ ~ fi iii
~ ~ • ~r; ~
i S ,~ ~~N
/ + ~ £ sn
~I
~ * \ `,~~
~ µ `~
~ ~
I £ i.
( w h
fi ~ 'F ~ _I ~
I ~ i k ~~
~ ` ~ 1
;r
, I I II ~
III
.. tl
II
. II
I
. I
I
'I
I
.I
.~ II
I
: l
1
1
1
•
-9 Od • iSR 60 I
xn t~'83R~dS 3MOH~ 11d3S0('
M.LLI0.29N
./1'9fd
•
H
V
~
~
~
~•~/
~
_
I ,'~/ ....~ ~
~,
y~
~ ~
1
~
I ~ ~ ~
µ
I I
P
Z
,~ I
~ I
~I
~
~
~ i
~ I
I
~I~
oa! * w
A
~ +~
o ~
z fi ~
I
I
~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~
~ $ ~
~ , I
~
~ ~ I
'I
fi I
~ 1
~
~ I
` h
- ~'~ '~ £ £ I
I
q rn 1F
I ~I y'~~~
~Y:°~ m ~ h
I
p~ ~ ~E
~$~
~~~
aa:
~~T
M I
I ~ ~ h ~ I
Y I JI M V 6a
Ily I 'I 1 ~ sp ~ 1F '~?LL h ~
, h r sBf I
~~ II ~ .iI ~ ~ 2 ,~ ~
~~~ Qs I ~ 4 ~ h .S
~~ ~~ C I :~ I~ h N~ .~ ~ I
~ I~~ I :'
h
I I
Z I
I I M I~ '~ ~ * ~ I
~ I
6 I I II `,I w ~ ~ I $~g~
B I I '~~
x15.00 fi~ x, ~ a~3
I i
I ~ A
1= ~
~ h ~~ ~ I
as I
ti ~ ~ 25 - -e
>,
I~v . ~ ,~
i
fi / /
~ s ~e_/ ~
n~,y .
III '' ~ ~ $~
I II I ~ ~ d
~ II
I
I I~
1
. ~ 6 III ~11
5~~1 I I
~1 I a~ Q
I!~~` ,
~~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ y9
q a~ ~~
~ ~.
T ,: ~
~- ~~ a ~.
8~~
g
~~ ' ~~
p
~ -~
~m a 6 rtl
J ~
J ~
ID -.~
N
+ +
,~
;,
0
~_ ~.~~ \
$ ~~ ~\ \~~
`~~ ~~~ \
I~`~ \~~
~", `~~ ~`
\~ \~~ \
~~~\
0
0
~p ...,~p8~ a
I I ~ z
m C '~-~ Q
rn Ctrl ~~ H
~y
O m O ~NI
y
~ ~
~ ~ yoZ
{
r~l -
~ m
~ °O
y c ~-
~ C ~~
~ $ a ~ ~v
.0
Opp r
m ~ ~
~
r m
mN
"i
$g
m~
„o n
~
N
~ *
~
~A
~ o Nm
~~~
r ~~D
m
5
?
mo g
~
~
N~ ~~
~~~~~oDv
u n n l l
n ~,`+~bq°Q~?,
~'i
H
~~a~~oD~
1 1 1 II , N p
v,cn ~w ~i"+
~ ~ ~ j~~ '
~~ y
N~ a0,
a~
7/99
$~ ~~ ~~
t" ~~ ~
~z ~~
~ ~
,~
r
~y A