20120681 Ver 1_401 Application_20120712

RM
20120681
Setting the Standard for Service
Geotechnical Construction Materials Environmental Facilities NC Registered Engineering Firm F 1078
July 9 2012
Ms Karen Higgins
NC DWQ 401/Wetlands Unit TT
512 North Salisbury Street Archdale Building — 9T" Floor ( LTV
Raleigh North Carolina 27604 �J
Subject Pre Construction Notification Application
Request for 401 Water Quality Certification
PJUL�i 0�� Proposed Sewer Line — Knox Road
McLeansville Guilford County North Carolina
ECS Project 09 19885 1 2012
Dear Ms Higgins
Please find five copies of the Pre Construction Notification Application for the above referenced
site The site is an approximate 10 000 linear foot sewer line extension located near Knox Road
in McLeansville The purpose of the project is to extend City of Greensboro sanitary sewer
services north of Interstate 40 to properties along Knox Road/Stewart Mill area
Previously ECS included information about a future sewer line in a permit application for
Project Stingray a property proposed for development with a data center (applicant Holder
Construction Company application dated 06/22/2011) Currently the use of the property for a
datacenter may not occur However the City of Greensboro is going to proceed wrth the
installation of the sewer line to serve the current and future residenfiaVcommerciaUndustnal
development in the area The proposed sewer line is going to be installed independently of the
proposed data center (whether constructed or not) and should therefore be reviewed as a
separate and independent project
Tributaries to Little Alamance Creek and wetlands are located within the proposed sewer line
corridor In order to identify the area of least impact ECS delineated approximately 2,000
linear feet of stream channel and approximately 5 acres of wetlands The delineation was used
to determine the final alignment of the sewer line while avoiding and minimizing impacts to
jurisdictional waters Due to topographic limitations and other variables in order to install the
sewer line it is necessary to temporarily impact 81 linear feet of stream channel and 0 005
acres of wetland In addition it is necessary for a concrete support associated with an aerial
crossing to be installed in one of the stream channels Temporary coffer dams will be used to
pump around the construction areas during the installation of the sewer line There are no
other stream or wetland impacts anticipated
One stream crossing utilizes an existing roadway /culvert (Exhibit Sheet 8 Buffer Impact 1) This
crossing was designed as near to perpendicular such that portions of the existing roadway
could be used as a vehicle maintenance easement (thus reducing stream impacts) The
crossing has been designed to impact approximately 300 square feet of Zone 1 and 200 square
feet of Zone 2 buffer and utilize approximately 1 000 square feet of existing roadway within the
buffer limits This crossing was designed at a non perpendicular angle to use the existing
4811 Koger Boulevard Greensboro NC 27407 T 336 856 7150 F 336 856 7160 www ecslimited com
ECS Carolinas LLP ECS Florida LLC ECS Mid Atlantic LLC ECS Southeast LLC ECS Texas LLP

Section 401 Permuting
Proposed Sewer line — Knox Road
McLeansville Guilford County North Carolina
ECS Project 0919885
roadway /culvert to minimize additional stream wetland and buffer impacts Two alternative
crossing locations have been were evaluated One alternative crossing would impact an
additional 125 square feet of buffer compared to the proposed crossing The other alternative
crossing would have additional wetland impacts compared to the proposed crossing Based on
a net reduction to the stream and buffer impacts by designing the crossing in an area where the
stream and associated buffers have already been impacted mitigation is not warranted or
proposed However due to the non perpendicular crossing written concurrence from the
NCDENR DWQ is required
On behalf of the City of Greensboro, I am requesting that a 401 Water Quality Certification be
issued to authorize the temporary impact to 81 linear feet of stream channel and 0 005 acres of
wetland The attached Permit application and associated exhibits provide details pertaining to
the projectlimpacts
With the exception of one sewer line crossing (located within an existing driveway /culvert
crossing where the stream and buffer have been previously impacted) the crossings have been
designed perpendicular to the streams and associated buffers The permanent easements
have been designed to be 10 feet in width The temporary construction easements have been
designed to be 40 feet wide or narrower A courtesy copy of the permit application is being
provided to the NCDWQ for review
Please feel free to contact me at (336) 856 -7150 if you have any questions concerning this
request or if additional information is required Thank you in advance for your timely
consideration of this matter
Sincerely
ECS Carolinas, LLP
ykq� T
Michael T Brame PWS
Senior Environmental Scientist
Attachment Pre Construction Notification Application
401 Water Quality Certification Fee $240 00
PA

O�0� WAT§?
O T
2 0 1 2068 1
Office Use Only
Corps action ID no
DWQ project no
Form Version 1 3 Dec 10 2008
Page 1 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version
Pre - Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A Applicant Information
1
Processing
la
Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps
®Section 404 Permit El Section 10 Permit
lb Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number 12 or General Permit (GP) number
1c
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corpse
❑ Yes
® No
1d
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply)
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non 404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
le
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification
N Yes ❑ No
For the record only for Corps Permit
❑ Yes ® No
if
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts If so attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in lieu
fee program
❑ Yes
® No
1g
Is the project located in any of NC s twenty coastal counties If yes answer 1 h
below
❑ Yes
® No
1h
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes
® No
2
Project Information
2a
Name of project
Proposed Sewer Line Stewart Mill /Knox Road
2b
County
Guilford W
lull
2c
Nearest municipality /town
McCleansville
2d
Subdivision name
LDENR
2e
NCDOT only T I P or state
project no
t:R pV
MW Branch
3
Owner Information
3a
Name(s) on Recorded Deed
The proposed sewer line crosses portions of parcels that are owned by multiple
owners View Attachments
3b
Deed Book and Page No
3c
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable)
3d
Street address
3e
City state zip
3f
Telephone no
3g
Fax no
3h
Email address
Page 1 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

4
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a
Applicant is
® Agent ❑ Other specify
4b
Name
Mr Michael Borchers
4c
Business name
(if applicable)
City of Greensboro
4d
Street address
P O Box 3136
4e
City state zip
Greensboro NC 27402 3136
4f
Telephone no
336 373 2494
4g
Fax no
336 412 6305
4h
Email address
mike borchers@greensboro nc gov
5
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a
Name
Bradley Luckey
5b
Business name
(if applicable)
ECS Carolinas LLP
5c
Street address
4811 Koger Boulevard
5d
City state zip
Greensboro NC 27407
5e
Telephone no
[phone]
5f
Fax no
[phone]
5g
Email address
bluckey @ecslimited corn
Page 2 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

B
Project Information and Prior Project History
1
Property Identification
1a
Property identification no (tax PIN or parcel ID)
Multiple Owners View Attachments
lb
Site coordinates (in decimal degrees)
Latitude 36 063842 Longitude
79 645905
(DD DDDDDD) ( DD DDDDDD)
1c
Property size
NA Linear Project acres
2
Surface Waters
2a
Name of nearest body of water (stream river etc ) to
proposed project
Little Alamance Creek
2b
Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water
WS V nutrient sensitive waters
2c
River basin
Cape Fear
Page 3 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

3
Project Description
3a
Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application
The site contains wooded land and fields Surrounding properties contain a church residences wooded land and fields
3b
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property
ECS delineated the proposed sewer line corridor during the preliminary planning process The sewer line was designed
to avoid and minimize impacts to the jurisdictional areas Approximately 5 acres of wetlands were delineated Two small
wetland pockets located within the easement that will be impacted due to project constraints are 0 005 acres in area The
pockets will be restored to the existing grade and will continue to function as wetlands However the pockets will be
converted from bottomland hardwood to low lying herbaceous vegetation
3c
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property
ECS delineated the proposed sewer line corridor during the preliminary planning process Approximately 2 000 linear
feet of stream channel were delineated The stream channel located within the easement that will be impacted will be 81
linear feet in length The impacts will be temporary with the exception of a concrete pier that must be placed into one of
the streams to support an aerial crossing The other stream crossings will have rip rap buried in the existing channel for
stabilization and use for crossing the stream to maintain the easement
3d
Explain the purpose of the proposed project
The purpose of the project is to extend City of Greensboro sanitary sewer services north of Interstate 40 to properties
along Knox Road/Stewart Mill area The extension is approximately 10 000 linear feet
3e
Describe the overall project in detail including the type of equipment to be used
The site contains undeveloped wooded land and fields The project consists of the installation of approximately 10 000
linear feet of sanitary sewer line adjacent to an unnamed tributary to Little Alamance Creek The proposed sewer line will
impact 81 linear feet of stream and 0 005 acres (218 square feet) of wetlands
The proposed sewer will have two aerial stream crossings One aerial crossing will consist of two 300 foot sections of
sewer line positioned on piers spaced on 40 foot intervals Per design the ductile iron pipe must have a support for every
40 feet One stream that must be crossed is approximately 40 feet wide Placing the piers on the edges of the stream
will damage both banks of the stream as well as the bed in two locations be subject to scour and contribute sediment into
the stream and have greater impact to the stream Therefore the pier is designed to be placed near the center of the
stream
The second aerial crossing will be placed through the banks of a stream approximately three feet above the ordinary high
water mark The crossing will be stabilized by placing footers within the banks and rip rap beneath the bed of the stream
The remaining stream crossings will be excavated and stabilized below the natural elevation of the stream bed The
elevations of the bed and banks of the stream will be returned to pre construction elevations after the installation of the
proposed sewer line and the exposed bed/banks will be stabilized with matting and vegetated with grass immediately
following installation of the line Sods will be stockpiled in upland areas adjacent to the crossings and will be used to
backfdl the excavated trench /buried line
The sewer lines have been designed to cross perpendicular to the streams in accordance with NCDWQ guidelines A10
foot permament maintenance crossing is being proposed at each of the stream crossings Temporary construction
easements ranging between 30 and 40 feet will be used at each of the stream crossings (in accordance with exempt
activities for underground utility stream /buffer crossings in the NCDENR Red Book Jordan Lake Buffer Rules) In upland
areas the permenant sewer easement and temporary construction easements will be greater than at the
stream /wetland/buffer crossings Haulers loaders excavators cranes and other heavy equipment will be used to clear
and grade the site and install the sewer lines Coffer dams will be installed in each of the construction areas and water
will be pumped around to prevent sediment from entering the stream
Page 4 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

4 Jurisdictional Determinations
4a Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
project (including all prior phases) in the past
®Yes E] No El Unknown
Comments A portion of the proposed project was verified by
Mr Andy Williams USACE and Ms Sue Homewood
NCDENR DWQ on September 1 2010
4b If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination what type
®Preliminary El Final
of determination was made?
4c If yes who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Agency /Consultant Company ECS Carolinas LLP
Name (if known) Michael Brame and Brad Luckey
Other
4d If yes list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation
September 1 2010
5 Project History
5a Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
❑ Yes ® No ❑ Unknown
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
5b If yes explain in detail according to help file instructions
One property that the sanitary sewer line will cross is an approximate 45 acre tract that was proposed for development A
permit has been issued for a temporary road crossing on a portion of the tract (Project Stingray SAW 2011 01285) The
proposed sewer line and permenant road crossing were initially planned to be the second phase of Project Stingray
However the construction of the data center may not occur and the City of Greensboro has decided to proceed with the
extension of the proposed sewer line to provide sewer services to current and future residential /commercialrndustrial
development in the vicinity of the site To meet the needs of the City of Greensboro the proposed sewer line is going to
be constructed independently of the proposed data center (whether constructed or not) and should therefore be
reviewed as a separate and independent project
6 Future Project Plans
6a Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes ® No
6b If yes explain
One property that the sanitary sewer line will cross is an approximate 45 acre tract that was proposed for development A
permit has been issued for a temporary road crossing on a portion of the tract (Project Stingray SAW 2011 01285) The
proposed sewer line and permenant road crossing were initially planned to be the second phase of Project Stingray
However the construction of the data center may not occur and the City of Greensboro has decided to proceed with the
extension of the proposed sewer line to provide sewer services to current and future residential /commercial /industrial
development in the vicinity of the site To meet the needs of the City of Greensboro the proposed sewer line is going to
be constructed independently of the proposed data center (whether constructed or not) and should therefore be
reviewed as a separate and independent project
Page 5 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

C Proposed Impacts Inventory
1 Impacts Summary
la Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply)
® Wetlands ® Streams tributaries ® Buffers
❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
Page 6 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

2 Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site then complete this question for each wetland area impacted
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
Wetland impact
Type of jurisdiction
number —
Type of impact
Type of wetland
Forested
(Corps 404 10
Area of impact
Permanent (P) or
(if known)
DWQ —non 404 other)
(acres)
Temporary T
W1 ❑ P ®T
Utility Line
Bottomland
Hardwoods
®Yes
Corps
0 004
Crossing
❑ No
® DWQ
W2 ❑ P ®T
Utility Line
Bottomland
® Yes
® Corps
0 001
Crossing
Hardwood
E] No
® DWQ
W3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
W6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ Corps
❑ No
❑ DWQ
2g Total wetland unpacts
2h Comments The proposed sewer line was designed to avoid impacts to the majority of wetlands located within the
evaluated corridor However it is necessary to impact two wetland pockets for a cumulative impact to 0 005 acres of wetland
Approximately 0 004 acres of wetland will be impacted by the permanent sewer line easement (exhibit sheet 7) Approximately
0 001 acres of wetland will be impacted by excavation assoicated with a stream crossing (exhibit sheet 6) The proposed
alignment of the sewer line can not avoid this wetland impact due to a large topographic gradient to the west of the proposed
sewer line alignment The natural elevation of the wetlands that will be impacted by the proposed sewer line will be restored to
pre construction elevations The wetlands are bottomland hardwoods that will be converted to low lying herbaceous Due to
the proposed wetland impacts being less than one tenth of an acre mitigation should not be required
3 Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted
3a
3b
3c
3d
3e
3f
3g
Stream impact
Type of impact
Stream name
Perennial
Type of jurisdiction
Average
Impact
number
(PER) or
(Corps 404 10
stream
length
Permanent (P) or
intermittent
DWQ — non 404
width
(linear
Temporary (T)
(INT)?
other)
(feet)
feet)
S1 ❑ P ®T
Utility Line
Unnamed
® PER
® Corps
8
81
Crossing
❑INT
❑ DWQ
S2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S3 ❑ P ❑ T
[]PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S4 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S5 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
S6 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ PER
❑ Corps
❑ INT
❑ DWQ
3h Total stream and tributary unpacts
81
31 Comments The proposed sewer line has been designed to cross streams at nine locations that have cumulative stream
impacts to 81 linear feet of stream channel (see attached Stream Impact Table) The stream crossings are aligned to cross the
streams at nearly perpendicular (90 degree) intersections Two stream crossings have been designed to cross streams
aerially on piers The first aerial crossing is designed to be supported on piers spaced on 40 feet intervals (exhibits sheets 2
and 3 ) The stream crossing was designed to position a pier in the stream channel to avoid erosion and scour during heavy
Page 7 of 15
PCN Form — Version 13 December 10 2008 Version

rain events around piers placed in proximity to the stream banks The second aerial stream crossing has been designed to be
supported by 10 feet by 6 feet by 12 feet foundations constructed outside of the stream limits to span the stream channel
(exhibit sheet 5) This crossing was designed due to the large topographic gradients of the stream channel and areas east of
the stream channel The two aerial stream crossings will impact 10 linear feet of stream channel with the installation of a 10
feet wide maintenace /vehicle crossing 6 inches below the native stream elevation
The remaining seven stream crossings will impact a total of 71 linear feet of stream due to the installation of 10 foot wide
vehicle /maintenance crossings (exhibit sheets 4 6 8 9 10 and 11) As shown on exhibit sheet 8 one stream crossing will be
excavated beneath a culvert currently utilized as a road crossing and will impact one linear foot of stream channel This
stream crossing was designed as close to 90 degrees as possible such that a vehicle /maintenance crossing would not be
required (thus reducing stream impacts) At the remaining six stream crossings the proposed sewer line will be buried below
the native elevation of the stream bed and banks Soils excavated from the stream bed and bank will be stockpiled in adjacent
upland areas and used with stone to backfill the sewer line excavation such that the elevation of the beds and banks will be
returned to their natural state The stream banks will be immediately stablized with vegetation and/or matting following the
installation of the line /maintenance corridor Due to the proposed stream impacts being temporary and less than 150 linear
feet mitigation should not be required
4 Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes ponds estuaries tributaries sounds the Atlantic Ocean or any other open water of
the U S then individually list all open water impacts below
4a
4b
4c
4d
4e
Open water
Name of waterbody
impact number —
(if applicable)
Type of impact
Waterbody type
Area of impact (acres)
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
01 ❑ PEI T
02 ❑P ❑T
03 ❑P ❑T
04 ❑ PEI T
4f Total open water compacts
4g Comments Open water impacts are not proposed
5 Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed the complete the chart below
5a
5b
5c
5d
5e
Wetland Impacts (acres)
Stream Impacts (feet)
Upland
Pond ID
Proposed use or purpose
(acres)
number
of pond
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
P1
P2
5f Total
5g Comments Constructed ponds or lakes are not being proposed
5h Is a dam high hazard permit required
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes permit ID no
51 Expected pond surface area (acres)
51 Size of pond watershed (acres)
5k Method of construction
Page 8 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

6 Buffer Impacts (for DWO)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer then complete the chart below If yes then individually list all buffer impacts
below If any impacts require mitigation then you MUST fill out Section D of this form
6a
❑ Neuse ❑ Tar Pamlico ® Other Jordan
Project is in which protected basin?
❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman
6b
6c
6d
6e
6f
6g
Buffer impact
number —
Reason
Buffer
Zone 1 impact
Zone 2 impact
Permanent (P) or
for
Stream name
mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Temporary T
impact
required?
B1 ❑ P ®T
Utility
Line
Unnamed
❑ Yes
® No
300
200
Crossing
B2 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
B3 ❑ P ❑ T
❑ Yes
❑ No
6h Total buffer impacts
300
200
61 Comments The proposed sewer line alignment crosses the streams at nearly perpendicular (90 degrees) intersections
The aerial and underground stream crossings have been designed to temporarily impact 40 linear feet (or less) of riparian
buffer Permanent easements (maintenance corridors) have been designed to be 10 feet wide The existing wooded land
within the permenant easements will be planted in low lying herbaceous vegetation that can be mowed Buffer mitiation should
not be required due to stream/buffer crossings being designed in accordance with exempt activities for aerial and
underground perpendicular utility crossings in the NCDENR Red Book Jordan Lake Riparian Buffer Rules
One stream crossing utilizes an existing roadway /culvert (Exhibit Sheet 8 Buffer Impact 3) This crossing was designed as
near to perpendicular such that portions of the existing roadway could be used as a vehicle mamtenace easement (thus
reducing stream impacts) The crossing has been designed to impact approximately 300 square feet of Zone 1 and 200
square feet of Zone 2 buffer and utilize approximately 1 000 square feet of exisitmg roadway within the buffer limits This
crossing was designed at a non perpendicular angle to use the exisitmg roadyway /culvert to minimize additional stream
wetland and buffer impacts Two alternative crossing locations have been were evaluated One alternative crossing would
impact an additional 125 square feet of buffer compared to the proposed crossing The other alternative crossing would have
additional wetland impacts compared to the proposed crossing A drawing that shows the alternate locations is included as an
attachment Based on a net reduction to the stream and buffer impacts by designing the crossing in an area where the stream
and associated buffers have already been impacted mitigation is not warranted or proposed
D Impact Justification and Mitigation
1 Avoidance and Minimization
la Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project
The proposed sewer line has been designed to minimize the number of stream crossings and subsequently
stream /wetland /buffer impacts One stream crossing has been designed to cross a stream section underground at a culvert
being used as a road crossing thus eliminating the need for a 10 foot wide maintenace corridor and additional stream
impacts The stream crossings are at or near 90 degree angles
The aerial stream crossings have been designed to limit riparian buffer impacts The temporary construction easements are
30 and 40 feet for the aerial stream crossings and the underground crossings do not exeed 40 feet with the majority being 30
feet Permanent easements and maintenance corridors have been designed to not exceed 10 feet Permanent easements will
be replanted with low lying herbaceous vegetation that can be mowed immediately following the sewer line installation
The vehicle /maintenance crossings have been designed so that excavated soils will be stockpiled in upland areas and used to
backfdl the trench/hne The elevation of the stream channel will be returned to its natural elevation Slopes will be stablized by
creating 31 slopes Rip rap will not be placed above the normal high water mark Stabilization measures above the normal
high water mark will consist of approved matting and/or vegtative cover Exhibit sheet 13 shows the plans for the permanent
vehicle /maintenance crossings
The project area contains approximately 5 acres of wetlands and 2 000 linear feet of stream channel The proposed sewer line
corridor is approximately 10 000 feet in length The proposed sewer line has been designed to avoid and minimize the impacts
Page 9 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

to streams and wetlands within the project area
One stream crossing utilizes an existing roadway /culvert (Exhibit Sheet 8 Buffer Impact 1) This crossing was designed as
near to perpendicular such that portions of the existing roadway could be used as a vehicle maintenace easement (thus
reducing stream impacts) The crossing has been designed to impact approximately 300 square feet of Zone 1 and 200
square feet of Zone 2 buffer and utilize approximately 1 000 square feet of existing roadway within the buffer limits This
crossing was designed at a non perpendicular angle to use the existing roadyway /culvert to minimize additional stream
wetland and buffer impacts Two alternative crossing locations have been were evaluated One alternative crossing would
impact an additional 125 square feet of buffer compared to the proposed crossing The other alternative crossing would have
additional wetland impacts compared to the proposed crossing Based on a net reduction to the stream and buffer impacts by
designing the crossing in an area where the stream and associated buffers have already been impacted mitigation is not
warranted or proposed
1 b Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques
The clearing limits will be staked and silt fence will be used The vehicle /maintenace crossings have been designed so that
excavated soils will be stockpiled in upland areas and used to backfill the trench line /maintenance corridor The stream
channel will be returned to its natural elevation following the installation of the vehicle /maintenance crossings Slopes will be
stabilized by creating 31 slopes Rip rap or stone will not be placed above the normal high water mark Stabilization measures
above the normal high water mark will consist of approved matting and/or vegtative cover Exhibit sheet 13 shows the plans
for the permanent vehicle /maintenance crossings
Temporary coffer dams will be installed upgradient of the proposed maintenance corridor The temporary coffer dams will be
constructed using earth and stone berms During construction water will be pumped around the construction area into
sediment traps (or sediment bags) prior to being discharged downgradient of the construction area Upon completion of the
sewer line installation the temporary coffer dams will be removed Following construction disturbed slopes will be stablized
with permanent seeding matting and temporary slopes linings Best Management Practices (BMPs) willl be implemented
during construction activities to avoid sediment discharge into downgradient streams and wetlands Exhibit sheet 12
generated by Stimmel Engineering shows the temporary creek crossing (pump around system)
2 Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State
2a Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
❑ Yes ® No
impacts to Waters of the U S or Waters of the State?
2b If yes mingathon is required by (check all that apply)
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
❑ Mitigation bank
2c If yes which mitigation option will be used for this
project
El Payment to in lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3 Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a Name of Mitigation Bank
3b Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type
Quantity
Page 10 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

3c Comments
4 Complete if Making a Payment to In lieu Fee Program
4a Approval letter from in lieu fee program is attached
❑ Yes
4b Stream mitigation requested
linear feet
4c If using stream mitigation stream temperature
❑ warm ❑ cool []cold
4d Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only)
square feet
4e Riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4f Non riparian wetland mitigation requested
acres
4g Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested
acres
4h Comments
5 Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan
6 Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWO
6a Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
❑ Yes ® No
6b If yes then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation Calculate the
amount of mitigation required
Zone
6c
Reason for impact
6d
Total impact
(square feet)
Multiplier
6e
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1 5
6f Total buffer mitigation required
6g If buffer mitigation is required discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e g payment to private mitigation bank
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration payment into an approved in lieu fee fund)
6h Comments Buffer mitiation should not be required due to the stream/buffer crossings being designed in accordance with
exempt activities for aerial and underground perpendicular utility crossings in the NCDENR Red Book Jordan Lake
Riparian Buffer Rules or being designed to use an existing area to minimize the impacts
Page 11 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

E
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWO)
1
Diffuse Flow Plan
la
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
® Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b
If yes then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no explain why
Comments The proposed sewer line is not expected to generate /concentrate
stormwater Existing diffuse flow is not expected to be altered or changed during or
after construction If diffuse flow is not maintained throughout the riparian buffers
❑ Yes ® No
during construction activities then periodic corrective actions to restore diffuse flow
will be designed to impede the formation of erosion gullies and ensure that diffuse
flow is maintained throughout the riparian buffer during construction activities
Therefore a diffuse flow plan should not be required
2
Stormwater Management Plan
2a
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
%
2b
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ Yes ® No
2c
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan explain why An increase in impervious surfaces is not
expected due to the installation of the proposed sewer line Stormwater should not be
generated/concentrated during or
after construction activities Therefore a stormwater mangement plan should not be required
2d
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan then provide a brief narrative description of the plan
❑ Certified Local Government
2e
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
❑ DWQ Stormwater Program
❑ DWQ 401 Unit
3
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a
In which local governments jurisdiction is this project?
Guilford County
® Phase II
3b
Which of the following locally implemented stormwater management programs
❑ NSW
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply)
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other
3c
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ® No
attached?
4
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
❑ Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a
Which of the following state implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ ORW
(check all that apply)
❑ Session Law 2006 246
❑ Other
4b
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
❑ Yes ® No
5
DWO 401 Unit Stormwater Review
Page 12 of 15
PCN Form —Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

5a Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
® Yes ❑ No
5b Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
® Yes ❑ No
F Supplementary Information
1 Environmental Documentation (DWO Requirement)
la Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal /state/local) funds or the
® Yes ❑ No
use of public (federal /state) land?
lb If you answered 'yes to the above does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes ® No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c If you answered yes to the above has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter)
❑ Yes ® No
Comments To the best of our knowledge a NEPA or SEPA is not required
2 Violations (DWO Requirement)
2a Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 0500) Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H 1300) DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards
❑ Yes ® No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B 0200)?
2b Is this an after the fact permit application?
❑ Yes ® No
2c If you answered `yes to one or both of the above questions provide an explanation of the violation(s)
3 Cumulative Impacts (DWO Requirement)
3a Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑ Yes ® No
additional development which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b If you answered yes to the above submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy If you answered no provide a short narrative description
The site is located in an area of Greensboro that is experiencing growth in residential commercial and industrial sectors
As a result sanitary sewer services will be needed to accommodate current and future land owners in the area We are
not aware of additional development that will result which will impact nearby downstream water quality
4 Sewage Disposal (DWO Requirement)
4a Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project or available capacity of the subject facility
Wastewater will not be generated by the proposed action
Page 13 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

5 Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ® No
habitat?
5b Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
® Yes ❑ No
impacts?
® Raleigh
5c If yes indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted
❑ Asheville
5d What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
ECS consulted the Natural Heritage Program Website to determine if Federally Protected Endangered or Threatened
species inhabit the site quadrangle The site is located on the Mcleansvdle NC Quadrangle There are no Federally
Listed Endangered or Threatened species identified on the Mcleansvdle NC Quadrangle
ECS contacted the US FWS concerning impacts to Federally Protected Endangered or Threatened species that may be
located within the project area The USFWS service requested that a detailed study be performed to identify the presence
of Small Whorled Pogonia Habitat Restoration and Assement Professionals (HARP) has performed a detailed study for
the project site HARP s study did not identify the Small Whorled Pogorna or suitable habitat for the species on the site A
copy of HARP s report is included as an attachment
6 Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ® No
6b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
The NCDENR has classified the watershed that includes the site as WS V nutrient sensitive waters The endangered
species list does not identify protected fish species that inhabit waterbodies nearby the site Based on our knowledge of the
site the project does not occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat
7 Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a Will this project occur in or near an area that the state federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ® No
status (e g National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources
There are no structures located on the site that could be considered for historical preservation status ECS personnel
have visited and walked the site in conjunction with a wetland delineation We have not observed artifacts on the site To
the best of our knowledge the site and adjoining properties are not designated as having historic or cultural preservation
status
Page 14 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

8 Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a Will this project occur in a FEMA designated 100 year floodplain?
® Yes ❑ No
8b If yes explain how project meets FEMA requirements The proposed sewer line alginment is adjacent to an unnamed
tributary to Little Alamance Creek The majority of the sewer line has been designed to avoid the 100 year flood plain
However portions of the proposed sewer line will encroach into the 100 year floodplain To address the aerial crossings
and their impacts to the floodplain a CLOMR study has been performed by Stimmel Associates PA The study has
been performed and submitted to the agencies for approval
8c What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map Panel Numbers
3710880400J 3710880300J and 3710881400J
SW tai
Appli nt/Agent s SIR ure
Applicant/Agent s Printed Name
Date
(Agents signature is vale my if an authon n letter from the applicant
is promded
Page 15 of 15
PCN Form — Version 1 3 December 10 2008 Version

I
LU
(n
Of
LU W
t:
Z < UJ
Ld >
Z LLJ
0
Ee
Z
< U
E8.`
(L
u moo-
*Olt*
0 _j
_j
z F-
i-- U)
z
U.
LLJ 0 ca
z
0 LLJ
z p
> LU �L
(n �e (0)
0
O
L
IN
44
"-4,st
Lu
t I <
--i,o:c)t Zt/91/60 TT",a-v\c, 6iaP-Ilq!4-3 6-!se010 W-QJIS aP-140 8090—01\S-U91HX3 DNISSOdO "&S

DRAWING NAME: P; \ 2010\ 100217 \Civ11 \100217 —ENG— C3D11.dwg — 30 —Inch Grov — PCN Exh2 —
5/17/2012 4:06 PM
50' RIPARIAN
BUFFER (ZONE 2
A. 1 0+ Ofa'�;
30' RP IAN
BIUF (ZONE 1)
�
TWO (2) 300 L.F. SECTIONS
OF 30" SEWER PIPE ,T0 ` bE
INSTALLED ON PIERS SHALL
BE RIGID RESTRAIMED
MECHANICAL JOINT DiPi
PROP. 40' TEMP.
CONSTi ESMT.—
TEMP. SAND BAG II
COFFER DAM
�V
TCE
I 1 1 _ 14100
D" 45 BEND .,
,1 NA
6
Z 4 ,�
I -t
I
L ^"r
10 L.F. OF PERMANENT
STREAM IMPACT
NOTES,
OGNTTR�iA�CTOR SHALL UTILIZE "COG STD. 213 -
TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING" FOR CONSTRUCTION
OF THE PROPOSED CONCRETE PIER WITHIN THE
STREAM CHANNEL,
FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION, CONTRACTOR SHALL
CONVERT TO "COG STD. 214 - PERMANENT CREEK
STABILIZATION" WITH 10' WIDE MAINTENANCE
CROSSING. USE CLASS II RIP -RAP, MIN. 18" DEPTH,
WITH FILTER FABRIC UNDERLAYMENT. TOP OF
RIP -RAP SHALL BE 6" BELOW EX. CREEK BOTTOM.
DAyis • MARTIN POWELL
ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS
6415 OLD PLANK RD, HIGH POINT, NC 27265
(336) 886 -4821 1 WWW.DMP- INC.COM I LICENSE: F -0245
CONCRETE PIERS
SPACED 40' O.C.
SEE SHT. S1
FOR DETAILS
2 +ols 4
_TCE
-,- -10' MAI�ITEN CORRIDOR
I17M 81UFFER ZONES
,F
V
NE 2)
r
CA
R j
25�'5r
-`' �•-.
I INAL DRAV+lIhJ�
RELEASE{ FOR CIt iFOR REYLEWAFPRUVAL RNLI'
0 4V 80'
SCALE: 1" s 40'
CITY OF GREENSBORO, NC
STEWART MILL AND KNOX ROAD AREA
OUTFALL AND WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
STREAM IMPACT EXHIBIT - PG. 2 OF 13
Irv, vit" �
,
r' h
30' RIPARIAN -�
-� W:7- C�
70�
FFER (ZONE 1 )
�50
T 0
�` 50' RIPARIj
BUFFER (Zi
5
10 L.F. OF PERMANENT
STREAM IMPACT
NOTES,
OGNTTR�iA�CTOR SHALL UTILIZE "COG STD. 213 -
TEMPORARY STREAM CROSSING" FOR CONSTRUCTION
OF THE PROPOSED CONCRETE PIER WITHIN THE
STREAM CHANNEL,
FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION, CONTRACTOR SHALL
CONVERT TO "COG STD. 214 - PERMANENT CREEK
STABILIZATION" WITH 10' WIDE MAINTENANCE
CROSSING. USE CLASS II RIP -RAP, MIN. 18" DEPTH,
WITH FILTER FABRIC UNDERLAYMENT. TOP OF
RIP -RAP SHALL BE 6" BELOW EX. CREEK BOTTOM.
DAyis • MARTIN POWELL
ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS
6415 OLD PLANK RD, HIGH POINT, NC 27265
(336) 886 -4821 1 WWW.DMP- INC.COM I LICENSE: F -0245
CONCRETE PIERS
SPACED 40' O.C.
SEE SHT. S1
FOR DETAILS
2 +ols 4
_TCE
-,- -10' MAI�ITEN CORRIDOR
I17M 81UFFER ZONES
,F
V
NE 2)
r
CA
R j
25�'5r
-`' �•-.
I INAL DRAV+lIhJ�
RELEASE{ FOR CIt iFOR REYLEWAFPRUVAL RNLI'
0 4V 80'
SCALE: 1" s 40'
CITY OF GREENSBORO, NC
STEWART MILL AND KNOX ROAD AREA
OUTFALL AND WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
STREAM IMPACT EXHIBIT - PG. 2 OF 13

DRAWING
5/17/201
NAME:
4:.06
P:\2010\100217\Civil\100217—ENG—C3Dll.dwg
PM
— 30 —Inch
Grov — PCN Exh3 —
i
-
z
H
'
T01 Mlolm
JM
24,
E
AWE
Ti
I
-
RIM
(
00.
EL--6(31
D
1
_
yv
F
D
EL.
_ 6
1.1
I
600
_-
I
-
I
4
i
•-_
I
I
t
---
1
-
7W
30
�._
PIP
T
d�10
I
s
STGILLED
OF
,
i
(
CONCRETE
I_
AAD
,
I
14
0
C.
-NEB-
j-
FI
t
MECwd
N I
-I
"TO
4
�Lr
_
?
D1
_77-7
45X
i
f
I
S
I
1
40.
f
40'
'LT
s
40'
t�r.
�
1.
I
590
1
rl
A-
f
LL
..........
i
M-i
S`TREAMI
v�
C
OS51N " F
qTE
-
—
, f�OR!AO
— - -�
RI���vTRVlluc
,
1
_
--
1
I
I CUIDW NG I COIN I ALTO
,4
_ £8N � 2 � _ _ ERMANEhS
— _.._ ,- _T- XAMINTE TIE
..a ..i,, �S ` `
yR,, -, CR IN SE ! C II RI R -R�
- 1 l t°'P�
': M ILTER7FABRl
!.•` is i R �ppy���� FryM� �'�Q
1
575 6' EL w EEi B TloM
10 =
+00 264.57 11 +00 12 +00
FINAL. DRAWING 4 o,
ry Ii?I i?H.EdSEGFOR CONSTRUCTIOI
R���
i p, - +I 1'Zot� POR REYIfWtA17R0Y41 GM.Y .SCALE: 1� S 40' HORIZ
+er11,101
11" 4' VERT
n
DAvIs • MARTIN • OW'
1 LL
CITY OF GREENSBORO, NC
STEWART MILL AND KNOX ROAD AREA
E N G I N E E R S & SURVEYORS
6415 OLD PLANK RD, HIGH POINT, NC 27265
OUTFALL AND WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
(336) 886 -4821 1 WWW•DMP- INC.COM I LICENSE: F-0245
STREAM IMPACT EXHIBIT - PG. 3 OF 13

date: 2I29/2012 1Ob #: 10 -060B
project: STEWART MILL AND KNOX ROAD AREA
OUTFALL AND WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
scale: 1 ° =40' sheet 4 of 13
deSCgpQt!o t: STREAM IMPACT EXHIBIT
JJ Mh IUJ J 11U4
k _ ,
r r k f�QN�
OFF SUF-F-�q
roe
r t
10' JNT�" CE 11
\ r COR�D4R ` COG STD. 214
r \ r \ 10' WIDE PERMANENT
CREEK STABILIZATION/
MAINTENANCE C SSING -
\
` l� 2 + 0
On SS r- Ss
\ r Ss ss
610
605
Pi
MN
595
18 +50
SSMH ,1'03
04111101;
CA
t
L
411$
`J
tSMH #103 1
STA = 18 +96.00
RIM = 608.88
C/I INV = 597.71
PUN
TEMP
'
TEMPO RAW
C0N TRUCTI iJ
EASEkENT
I '
SSM # 104
TWP SAND
BAG .-COFF GAMS
10 V Of �
STREAM IWP T
N Trade Street
St i m m e l
Suite
Suite 200
SANDBAGS
Wnston Salem NC
Landscape Architecture
271012916
Civil Engineering
— - - - --
Stimmel Associates, PA Land Planning
P 336 723 1067
F 336 723 1069
date: 2I29/2012 1Ob #: 10 -060B
project: STEWART MILL AND KNOX ROAD AREA
OUTFALL AND WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
scale: 1 ° =40' sheet 4 of 13
deSCgpQt!o t: STREAM IMPACT EXHIBIT
JJ Mh IUJ J 11U4
k _ ,
r r k f�QN�
OFF SUF-F-�q
roe
r t
10' JNT�" CE 11
\ r COR�D4R ` COG STD. 214
r \ r \ 10' WIDE PERMANENT
CREEK STABILIZATION/
MAINTENANCE C SSING -
\
` l� 2 + 0
On SS r- Ss
\ r Ss ss
610
605
Pi
MN
595
18 +50
SSMH ,1'03
04111101;
CA
t
L
411$
`J
tSMH #103 1
STA = 18 +96.00
RIM = 608.88
C/I INV = 597.71
PUN
TEMP
'
TEMPO RAW
C0N TRUCTI iJ
EASEkENT
I '
SSM # 104
TWP SAND
BAG .-COFF GAMS
10 V Of �
STREAM IWP T
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE:
1.
SSMki #104
610
SANDBAGS
STA = 20 +24.40
BYPASS STREAM FLOW AROUND
-- — —
— - - - --
�. RIM = 607.19
C/'I INV =. 597.90
PLACE STREAM STA8IUZATION
STONE.
;.
REMOVE COFFER DAMS TO
RESTORE STREAM FLOW.
5
SEE SHEETS 12 & 13 FOR
6
BYPASS PUMPING AND
605
MAINTENANCE CROSSING
MANEyT CREEK
MAitiT NA'vC;
`:
STREAM ANV;_RT
J_
'7a L:
0 "D��O 5�
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE:
1.
INSTALL COFFER DAMS USING
610
SANDBAGS
2
BYPASS STREAM FLOW AROUND
SAND BAGGED AREA.
3,
INSTALL SEINER LINE AND
PLACE STREAM STA8IUZATION
STONE.
;.
REMOVE COFFER DAMS TO
RESTORE STREAM FLOW.
5
SEE SHEETS 12 & 13 FOR
6
BYPASS PUMPING AND
605
MAINTENANCE CROSSING
OETAI'_S.
600
595
19 +00 19 +50 20 +00 20 +50

Stimmel
Landscape Architecture
t., ;�,_
Civil Engineering
Stimmel Associates, PA Land Planning
610
604
60C
595
590
29
1
TSTRU RARY
ONSTRUCTION
EASEMENT
MI, 1%
601 N Trade Street date: 2/29/2012 job #: 10 -0608
Suite 200
Winston Salem K project: STEWART MILL AND KNOX ROAD AREA
27101.2916
P 336 723 1067 - --
OUTFALL AND WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS_
F 336 723 1069 scale: 1" = 40' sheet 5 of 13
description: STREAM IMPACT EXHIBIT
ONE Z 'BUFFER
:
E 1�Z
,ONE . OFF TO
50
SS
SSMK !106A
P s IP MP
G S 1 214
CR T L I
ZATION -/ 1, E RMANQ 11
TE C_
'CR05SINO
N #1
*TEMP,NRY ,SAND w-. mms �� OF
V+M W A.CT`
510
=f-
ME
595
i
590
90
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE:
1. INSTALL COFFER DAMS USING
SANDBAGS
2. BYPASS STREAM FLOW AROUND
SAND BAGGED AREA.
3. INSTALL SEWER LINE AND
PLACE STREAM STABILIZATION
STONE.
k REMOVE COFFER DAMS TO
RESTORE STREAM FLOW.
5. SEE SHEETS 12 & 13 FOR
6. BYPASS PUMPING AND
MAINTENANCE CROSSING
i7E1Ai4{`i.11
,o, 1M CAp �►R.
C
107
SSM
ST; = 30 +60,88
I
C/1 INV 599,46
10
6'x12 "'FOOTING
218 tF
-- —
DIP 0 0.159
G
-
77
—
274 L0
1.5%
I H' 1-1
— MEC---O<
R G!
S -ABI' ZA-J`;/
3E -Ow Ex S IING
00 29 +50
30 +00
30 +50
311+
510
=f-
ME
595
i
590
90
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE:
1. INSTALL COFFER DAMS USING
SANDBAGS
2. BYPASS STREAM FLOW AROUND
SAND BAGGED AREA.
3. INSTALL SEWER LINE AND
PLACE STREAM STABILIZATION
STONE.
k REMOVE COFFER DAMS TO
RESTORE STREAM FLOW.
5. SEE SHEETS 12 & 13 FOR
6. BYPASS PUMPING AND
MAINTENANCE CROSSING
i7E1Ai4{`i.11
,o, 1M CAp �►R.
C

- ""10 MIU�FFEiVAtQG 30' TEMPORARY
iSMH 1108 CORRIpOtt COKSTRUCili
_ - EASEMENT
SS - 5s�—
24" SF OF
WEl` LAND' lM�AI;T
'— TEMPORAWt AND
BAG COFFER GAMS _
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE:
1. INSTALL COFFER DAMS USING
SANDBAGS
2. BYPASS STREAM FLOW AROUND
SAND BAGGED AREA.
3. INSTALL SEWER LINE AND PLACE
STREAM STABILIZATION STONE.
4. REMOVE COFFER DAMS TO RESTORE
STREAM FLOW.
5. SEE SHEETS 12 do 13 FOR
6. BYPASS PUMPING AND
615 MAINTENANCE CROSSING DETAILS.
61{
60!
60C
date: 5/16/2012 .�_ l b #: 10 -0608
project: STEWART MILL AND KNOX ROAD AREA
OUTFALL AND WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS _
scale: V=40' sheet 6_ of 13
description: STREAM AND VVETLAND IMPACT EXHIBIT
COC STD. 214
1V --WIDE Pi R -. Ltfi -
CREEK I ?A' /
_,- MAINTENANCE CROSSING
1 t�... tF UE
STREAM IMPACT _
SCALE: 1 " = 40'
40 0 40
6wSA-m"
41
501 N Trade Street
S t i m m e 1
Suite 200
Winston Salem NC
Landscape Architecture
27101-2916
Civil Engineering
Stimmel Associates, PA Land Planning
P 336723 1067
F 336 723 1069
- ""10 MIU�FFEiVAtQG 30' TEMPORARY
iSMH 1108 CORRIpOtt COKSTRUCili
_ - EASEMENT
SS - 5s�—
24" SF OF
WEl` LAND' lM�AI;T
'— TEMPORAWt AND
BAG COFFER GAMS _
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE:
1. INSTALL COFFER DAMS USING
SANDBAGS
2. BYPASS STREAM FLOW AROUND
SAND BAGGED AREA.
3. INSTALL SEWER LINE AND PLACE
STREAM STABILIZATION STONE.
4. REMOVE COFFER DAMS TO RESTORE
STREAM FLOW.
5. SEE SHEETS 12 do 13 FOR
6. BYPASS PUMPING AND
615 MAINTENANCE CROSSING DETAILS.
61{
60!
60C
date: 5/16/2012 .�_ l b #: 10 -0608
project: STEWART MILL AND KNOX ROAD AREA
OUTFALL AND WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS _
scale: V=40' sheet 6_ of 13
description: STREAM AND VVETLAND IMPACT EXHIBIT
COC STD. 214
1V --WIDE Pi R -. Ltfi -
CREEK I ?A' /
_,- MAINTENANCE CROSSING
1 t�... tF UE
STREAM IMPACT _
SCALE: 1 " = 40'
40 0 40
6wSA-m"
41
595
33+100 334
615
610
605
600
595
I A CWT
MAINTENANCE
_
- - - --
—
CR4SSINC-0-6"
BELOW LN'VER
ry'
-G
STREAM IRlVERT•
�° r
227. LF M-40
0 0 -T57
SSW- poa
_ SSMH 109
!
A=
r
STA +p�
-RANI = 615.08 _
_
RIM = 608.82
C/I INV = 599.87
C/I INV = 600.21
-
595
33+100 334
615
610
605
600
595

date: 2129/2012 _ -job #: jm6w
project: STEWART MILL AND KNOX ROAD AREA
OUTFALL AND WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
scale: I"=40' sheet 7 Of 13
description: WETLAND IMPACT EXHIBIT
4SMH 10a _ SCMH 110
SSMH #116
r
1
20' PERMAN� ��II T `� �� '1 �
� I '
., r:
SEWER VkMENT
SF OF
WEfLAN05 IMPACT i 4 ti i
`.V
9O
40' TEMP OR Ry '"
CaNSTRI1CTl6N
EASEMENT
,4 .t
i t1�y1 v'1
1 LO TP
SSWM #109
R
SEAL
1d4AG _
SCALE: 1 " = 40'
i , 0 40
601 N Trade Street
S t i m m e f
Suite ZDO
Winston Salem NC
Landscape Architecture
27101.2.916
Civil Engineering
Stimmel Associates, PA Land Planning
P 336 723 1067
F 336 723 1069
date: 2129/2012 _ -job #: jm6w
project: STEWART MILL AND KNOX ROAD AREA
OUTFALL AND WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
scale: I"=40' sheet 7 Of 13
description: WETLAND IMPACT EXHIBIT
4SMH 10a _ SCMH 110
SSMH #116
r
1
20' PERMAN� ��II T `� �� '1 �
� I '
., r:
SEWER VkMENT
SF OF
WEfLAN05 IMPACT i 4 ti i
`.V
9O
40' TEMP OR Ry '"
CaNSTRI1CTl6N
EASEMENT
,4 .t
i t1�y1 v'1
1 LO TP
SSWM #109
R
SEAL
1d4AG _
SCALE: 1 " = 40'
i , 0 40

date: 2/29/2012 job #: 10 -0608
project: STEWART MILL AND KNOX ROAD AREA
OUTFALL AND WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS -
scale: 1" = 40' sheet 8 of 13
description: STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACT EXHIBIT
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE 11
1. INSTALL COFFER DAMS USING
SANDBAGS
2 BYPASS STREAM FLOW AROUND
SAND BAGGED AREA.
3 INSTALL SEWER LINE AND PLACE / J '� t � � roe IV
STREAM STABILIZATION STONE_
4 REMOVE COFFER DAMS TO R 10REI
STREAM FLOW. � �` � ,' • 1u .'- t � � � � �(
5 SEE SHEETS 12 & 13 FOR
6. BYPASS PUMPING AND
MAINTENANCE CROSSING DETAILS J'• 1 •� si Jt 1. 1 C _ K, ..r
t
COG STD. 214
10' WIDE
PERMANENT GREEK 10' M
STABI-iZ AT 6i/
MAINTENANCE
CROSSINt- ;
BYPASS
PUMP
4 +00 r
1;� 1 —\- —
X
SSMH #111
STA = 41+78.84
RIM = 614.17
C/I INV = 601.42
61F
61C
6095
i' r SSMH '112
7+%1�� � '-n -� ...i / ,1` i�'- ,.. rte:•„ i. CJs, `l!
SCALE: 1 " = 40'
TEMPORARY SAND 40 0 41
BAG COFFER DAMS
N Trade Street
Stimmel
Sude 200
Suite
1
WinSfon Salem NC
Landscape Architecture
27101 -2916
Civil Engineering
Stimmel Associates, PA Land Planning
P 336 723 1067
F 336 723 1069
date: 2/29/2012 job #: 10 -0608
project: STEWART MILL AND KNOX ROAD AREA
OUTFALL AND WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS -
scale: 1" = 40' sheet 8 of 13
description: STREAM AND WETLAND IMPACT EXHIBIT
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE 11
1. INSTALL COFFER DAMS USING
SANDBAGS
2 BYPASS STREAM FLOW AROUND
SAND BAGGED AREA.
3 INSTALL SEWER LINE AND PLACE / J '� t � � roe IV
STREAM STABILIZATION STONE_
4 REMOVE COFFER DAMS TO R 10REI
STREAM FLOW. � �` � ,' • 1u .'- t � � � � �(
5 SEE SHEETS 12 & 13 FOR
6. BYPASS PUMPING AND
MAINTENANCE CROSSING DETAILS J'• 1 •� si Jt 1. 1 C _ K, ..r
t
COG STD. 214
10' WIDE
PERMANENT GREEK 10' M
STABI-iZ AT 6i/
MAINTENANCE
CROSSINt- ;
BYPASS
PUMP
4 +00 r
1;� 1 —\- —
X
SSMH #111
STA = 41+78.84
RIM = 614.17
C/I INV = 601.42
61F
61C
6095
i' r SSMH '112
7+%1�� � '-n -� ...i / ,1` i�'- ,.. rte:•„ i. CJs, `l!
SCALE: 1 " = 40'
TEMPORARY SAND 40 0 41
BAG COFFER DAMS
600
41 +50
-►c•rw t<tau 4.]tUU 43+50
615
610
60 5
600
44 +00
SSMH
112
A 43 +7 .02
- - - -- -
ft, - 614.9
!
C/I INV = 601 71
-
XtSTI, f NGI GR# )E-
__ _._�
-
-- - -
--
MAMMA-
I
I
1###,R
PERMANENT CREEK
J EgJ+{a
STABILIZATION
_y
741
CROSSING ® 6"
39LOW- E--XI --S IN
STREAM INVERT
E)IP a O.I
Y
600
41 +50
-►c•rw t<tau 4.]tUU 43+50
615
610
60 5
600
44 +00

Stimmel
Landscape Architecture
Civil Engineering
Stimmel Associates, PA Land Planning
COG STD. 2.14
10' WIDE
PERMANENT CREEK
STABILIZATION/
J 1
J
f /
1
1
n J
/ 1
. � 1
s SSMH #115
62C
615
r o
605
49
601 N. TradeStreeE date: 2129/2012 job #: 10 -0608
Suite 200
Winston Salem. NC project: STEWART MILL AND KNOX ROAD AREA
27101-2916
P 336.723 1067 —
OUTFALL AND WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
F 336 723 1069 scale: V= 40' sheet 9 of 13
description: STREAM IMPACT EXHIBIT
RWH 11ri - SRMH 11R
-~ - ZONE 1
7 1$0' �} EIUF FEt�i
r
i
P P
Imp
\
I1
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE:
I. INSTALL COFFER DAMS USING SANDBAGS
2. BYPASS STREAM FLOW AROUND SAND BAGGED AREA.
3. INSTALL SEWER LINE AND PLACE STREAM
STABILIZATION STONE.
4. REMOVE COFFER DAMS TO RESTORE STREAM FLOW.
5. SEE SHEETS 12 & 13 FOR BYPASS PUMPING AND
MAINTENANCE CROSSING DETAILS.
30' TEMPORARY
CONSTRU�TiON\
EASEMENT \\
f y' MMAINTENA.N
CORRIDOR
57MH # 1 16
l vlPORARY \ \ \
SAND RAC • \ \ `.
FFW "UAMa
SCALE: 1 " = 40'
40 0 40
I out
sty,;- i
AIL N66
flflllttll�����,y +`
I
D5
0
i
I
M1 I 15
� S
I
' t
4 +41 .2
RIM = X61 .39
4/11--INV r 606.
i
RMANENT CREEK
q
-- —
-
STABILIZATION/
- ....— ..___ --
NAIN7ENANC_
-�
:
„.
CROSSING 0 6"
3-c -ow EXIST+w
5 , REAM INVERT
-
3
_ 20° Jt? 0 0.I
E
+-00 49 +50
50
+00 50
+50 51+00
51 +°
I out
sty,;- i
AIL N66
flflllttll�����,y +`
I
D5
0

date: 5/16/2012 i0b #. SQ4)6W
project; STEWART MILL AND KNOX ROAD AREA
OUTFALL AND WA fLR SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS__
Scale: 1" = 40' sheet 10 Of 13
description; STREAM IMPACT EXHIB11 z
35' TEMPORAY 1
CONSTRUCTION -{
�- EASEMENT 5a,
Y
57+04
� SS ss Jl i
55,VH 1-T9 — — —
_- II�
10' MAINTEN.,
625
620
615
610
1 4V l
FONt 2
VF roe
SSMH #120
.L 1
SS
Six 0_ �.
— , 0 \ \
. COG S 21 4�
10' WIDE ERMANEN'r \
OF qCREEK 5T tLIZATIQNJ
j STREAM IMPACT { MAINTENANCE gROSSING
N Trade SUeet
St i m m e l
SuV
Su4e 200
5)UALL: 1 = 4U
'Ahnslon Salem NC
Landscape Architecture
27101.2916
Civil Engineering
40 0 4
Stimmel Associates, PA Land Planning
P 336 723 1067
F 336 723 1069
date: 5/16/2012 i0b #. SQ4)6W
project; STEWART MILL AND KNOX ROAD AREA
OUTFALL AND WA fLR SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS__
Scale: 1" = 40' sheet 10 Of 13
description; STREAM IMPACT EXHIB11 z
35' TEMPORAY 1
CONSTRUCTION -{
�- EASEMENT 5a,
Y
57+04
� SS ss Jl i
55,VH 1-T9 — — —
_- II�
10' MAINTEN.,
625
620
615
610
1 4V l
FONt 2
VF roe
SSMH #120
.L 1
SS
Six 0_ �.
— , 0 \ \
. COG S 21 4�
10' WIDE ERMANEN'r \
OF qCREEK 5T tLIZATIQNJ
j STREAM IMPACT { MAINTENANCE gROSSING
125
i20
15
IG"_)
5)UALL: 1 = 4U
SS PH 11
-
--
40 0 4
4
ST� =-
RIM = 162d.55'
C I = i
60.46
- — I --
—rt -- - —
-
_
+86.07
i I
RIM =
62 .79
-
--
,
MIL
w,
���ry1 /1Utµ�t,t•1ti
PERMANENT CREEK
-
STABILIZATION/
r — -
- -- - -- —
-
Me11ti.IENAN.CF_
CROSSINC 0 6"
STREAM INVERT
{
?j! = 2)"
9) D. 157,
f50 57+00
57 +50 581M
Wit
125
i20
15
IG"_)

BYPASS
40' TEMP Y PUMP
CONST CTION
EASEMENT
YD' A/AINTENA�CE
C Uf>Hi10 ' r -
s
s
�px60
SS
A11
e1;
s1{
date: 5/16/2012 _Lob #; 10 -0606
project: STEWART MILL AND KNOX ROAD AREA
OUTFALL AND WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS _
scale: r' = 50' _sheet 11 — of 13
description: STREAM IMPACT EXHIBIT
J Mti 1L1 - JJNIH ILL
4
0'r
TEMPORARY SAND
;r. COFFER DAMS
+ 63 +0
ss, ss I I
COG TD 214, \. ` J
�T 117` DE PERMANENT `� S *H #1
CREEtC TABILI2AT101W f
wi�■iuii�mmn�i
1.
out N Trade Street
630
Stimmel
Suite 200
BYPASS STREAM FLOW
Winston Salem NC
Landscape Architecture
27101 -2916
r
Civil Engineering
PLACE STREAM STABILIZATION
Stimmel Associates, PA
Land Planning
F 336 727 1067
F 336 723 1069
BYPASS
40' TEMP Y PUMP
CONST CTION
EASEMENT
YD' A/AINTENA�CE
C Uf>Hi10 ' r -
s
s
�px60
SS
A11
e1;
s1{
date: 5/16/2012 _Lob #; 10 -0606
project: STEWART MILL AND KNOX ROAD AREA
OUTFALL AND WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS _
scale: r' = 50' _sheet 11 — of 13
description: STREAM IMPACT EXHIBIT
J Mti 1L1 - JJNIH ILL
4
0'r
TEMPORARY SAND
;r. COFFER DAMS
+ 63 +0
ss, ss I I
COG TD 214, \. ` J
�T 117` DE PERMANENT `� S *H #1
CREEtC TABILI2AT101W f
wi�■iuii�mmn�i
1.
INSTALL COFFER DAMS
630
USING SANDBAGS
2.
BYPASS STREAM FLOW
AROUND SAND BAGGED
AREA.
3.
INSTALL SEWER LINE AND
PLACE STREAM STABILIZATION
STONE.
4,
REMOVE COFFER DAMS TO
625
RESTORE STREAM FLOW.
5.
SEE SHEETS 12 & 13 FOR
BYPASS PUMPING AND
MAINTENANCE CROSSING
DETAILS.
tall
Jim
i
v1TUV olrou 04ruu az*aw 53+00
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE:
1.
INSTALL COFFER DAMS
630
USING SANDBAGS
2.
BYPASS STREAM FLOW
AROUND SAND BAGGED
AREA.
3.
INSTALL SEWER LINE AND
PLACE STREAM STABILIZATION
STONE.
4,
REMOVE COFFER DAMS TO
625
RESTORE STREAM FLOW.
5.
SEE SHEETS 12 & 13 FOR
BYPASS PUMPING AND
MAINTENANCE CROSSING
DETAILS.
520
515
610
:CALL = 50 r
50 u 5t"
l � �
505

PLIMP
MEAM
FLOW
TEMP.
,?4 " rO
44 " CMP
CLASS °I
RIP' RAP
PROPOSED
EARTH BERM
(TYP.)
T4'MP, COW$rRuG•MN
STREAM CROSSING
FLOW -�
MIN. _ MIN
I
Q�
4
I
PROMSED 12 of 13
ARM BERM
(T YP. )
ro,_
CLASS 'I- MIN. rD x so
RrP AAf' SEDIMENT TRAP
0 2' ! SIDE SLOPE
OR Sk T OAS
2' CLASS •A'
CROSSING EROSION CONTROL
PIPE STONE NErR
— BO
40' CowrRUCTION EASEALm
/ 1 DENA ERING BASIN
2.' 1 SIOE SLOPE
10 OR SIL T PAG,
MIN. 4'`�•�1�;' +" ;
4
EARTH BERM PL f
Pa YEMYLENE FASUC (T YP.) y
aV FACE (8 ML. TiHrM SAP
TO , MINA rop
BAND — — — — — — — �r��i, V ; OF FR�N
6
D Ur a
` EX. INV- /� TEMPORARY
- CREEk STGAE OAh
f90L METHYL ENE FARC
ON CAGE (B ML, THrM
-•.> G,RFJSSINf
PIPE
POLYETHYLENE FABRIC
ON FACE (8 X. THICK)
A INSTALL SANl18ASS IN PIPE 1XV -P'RF 6 FABRIC WHILE P(JMPl,VG
--- AROUND DURING C0N9TF?UL'Troty IN sm6m_
B REMOVE SANL?BAGS 6 FABRIC PO ALLOY FLOM TH)90U'6H
PIPE WHEN NOT PU+MPrNG AROUND -
SECTION A -A
C / T Y OF G R E E N S B O R O
STANDARD MAPDRARY CRE'E'K M. ND. REV.
Or-s1 06-037
MOSSING DURNG CONSTRUCTION , 03 -97 09 -05
03 -05

0
N
20 PERM, i 1 3 of 13
�
I -^ - -- - EASAfENT (MIN. - - - - - -- - -I
w
111
_ Y OP OF BANK
J
7
STREAM
FL ON
I I
NA TURAL
�— GROUND RIP -RAP
Cl�Cd5S1I�AG TYPICAL
PIPE
SYNTHETIC FIL TER
FABRIC
PLAN
TOP OF BANK RIP RAP SHALL NOT
EXTEND ABOVE NORMAL
DRAINAGE DITCH
OR SMALL STREAM HIGH WATER MARK
SYNTHETIC FIL TER
EX. INV. ' % " FABRIC (AS PER
CREEK ''� ,' `� NCDOT SPEC #1056,
°cr TYPE -2)
CROS'S'ING PIPE FF,
Wo
�55�
9rsrr
18" CLASS I
�.``,a•
RIP -RAP
s
' AL
SECTION A —A s
- -- -
NOTES' r �Q r•�r' aa*
rir �
1) PERMANENT CROSSING FOR VEHICLE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT.
a
2) CLASS I RIP -RAP TO BE LAID MIN. 18 INCHES THICK OVER ENTIRE AREA OFr�t11��GANCE
(AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER) .
i 3) CLASS II RIP -RAP USED IN LARGER STREAMS (AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER) .
41 AS PROJECT IS STABILIZED PLACE SYNTHETIC FILTER FABRIC 6 SPREAD ALL EXISTING
EROSION STONE INTO PERMANENT LINER AS SHOWN. ADD STONE AS NEEDED.
5) A61Y REOUIREO ARMORING ABOVE NORMAL HIGH WATER MARK SHALL CONSIST OF
MA T TING OR APPROVED VEGETA rI VE COVER.
;C/ T Y OF OREENSB0R O
STANDARD PERMANENT CREEK STABIL IZA TION
STD. W.
REV.
A214
01 -91 06 -05
03 -97
WI TH MAINTENANCE CROSSING

Stream
Type of
Stream
Perennial
Type of
Average
Impact
Impact
Impact
Name
(Per) or
Jurisdiction(
Stream
Length
Number
Intermittent
Corps 404
Width
(linear
P or T
(INT)
10 DWQ
(feet)
feet)
non 404
other)
S1
Utility
Unnamed
PER
Corps
8
10
Line
Crossing
S2
Utility
Unnamed
PER
Corps
8
10
Line
Crossing
S3
Utility
Unnamed
PER
Corps
8
10
Line
Crossing
S4
Utility
Unnamed
PER
Corps
8
10
Line
Crossing
S5
Utility
Unnamed
PER
Corps
8
10
Line
Crossing
S6
Utility
Unnamed
PER
Corps
3
1
Line
Crossing
S7
Utility
Unnamed
PER
Corps
8
10
Line
Crossing
S8
Utility
Unnamed
PER
Corps
8
10
Line
Crossing
S9
Utility
Unnamed
PER
Corps
8
10
Line
Crossing

ECS Carolinas, LLP
AGENT AUTHORIZATION
Scope of Work Stream Permitting Services
Location Proposed Sewer Line Alignment — Knox Road
McLeansvdle Guilford County North Carolina
This form authorizes ECS to act as our agent in stream /wetland matters including U S
Army Corps of Engineers and North Carolina Division of Water Quality field verification
and permit application
Owner /Agent Information
Name o- (i t4&&4%r0'ac 'ro
Address 2&Vo �c M.M�
C eo�&��ao CIM N C. -4-;:F'-4 O G
Telephone Number 33� 3'�3– WEE
Fax Number S-
E mail ArldrAce
Signature
Ske�►!e_ �� -e��� �..r- ee�v�*��ooro — �nc� q o �/
-r -rZ

1I V 4i
'4
iI
II
I�
II "
X11
I if -
�� r
l
IL
It
I
�r"�"—�r . •r�.—:^.� -tee• ��� : � .�. —tm .�
N
f
f,*
I I

THE STREAM/WETLAND LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE APPROXIMATE, THEY HAVE BEEN DELINEATED
BY ECS. THEY HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE U.S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS. THEY HAVE NOT BEEN
SURVEYED.
ISW it 17—
F f iTINQRAY
I 95NN I„A y
"Mk Is
smm $113
IAH IM
—p;zz—_
H I+tc
• - -- -- __ 41 \
"4101 "4101 I 1769 ---- -
4P-2
FT
—
��
� t �
+ _ — �' ,` 77\ "��' // '/� S� 4 � l j �- • - �; dr ssel /cos �,� 1. % f\
1 � � `:' .rte. • f j.� r
1 I
- '
LEGEND r`
---- -- Proposed Sewer Line Alignment (Subject to Change)
/L Approximate Location of Perennial Stream h
Approximate Location of Intermittent Stream
Approximate Location of Wetland
DP-1 ® Flag Number /Approximate Location r
SOURCE:
'OVERALL OFFSITE PUBLIC SANITARY
SEWER LAYOUT PREPARED BY STIMMEL
ASSOCIATES, P.A. AND FIELD NOTES
PREPARED BY ECS PERSONNEL
NOT TO SCALE
CAROLINAS
.�1 SSW,.
if
SEAM 0102
V 1
FIGURE 3A
STREAM/WETLAND LOCATION MAP
PROPOSED SEWER LINE ALIGNMENT
MCLEANSVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
ECS PROJECT NO. 09-19885

THE STREAMMETLAND LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THIS MAP ARE APPROXIMATE. THEY HAVE BEEN DELINEATED
BY ECS. THEY HAVE NOT BEEN VERIFIED BY THE U.S ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS. THEY HAVE NOT BEEN
SURVEYED.
tt FUTURE PUBLIC
SANITARY SEWER j
t OUTFALL
I
s
i
3 r
/ r
•r I
tr �
PLEASE NOTE THAT THE STREAM/WETLAND LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THIS MAP HAVE BEEN PREVIOUSLY
DELINEATED, VERIFIED BY THE AGENCIES AND SURVEYED. DURING THE INITAIL DELINEATION, AN UPLAND
BERM THAT IS LOCATED ADJACENT TO ONE OF THE STREAMS WAS INCLUDED WITHIN THE WETLAND
BOUNDARY FLAGS. ECS REVISITED THE AREA TO DELINEATE THE BOUNDARY BETWEEN THE WETLAND AND
THE UPLAND BERM SO THE EXACT WETLAND IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE SEWER LINE CAN BE
DETERMINED. IT IS NOT NECESSARY TO LOCATE THE OTHER JURISDICTIONAL AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN
PREVIOUSLY SURVEYED.
LEGEND
i Proposed Sewer Line Alignment
Approximate Location of Perennial Stream
Approximate Location of Wetland
SOURCE:
FIGURE 3B
PRELIMINARY ONSITE PUBLIC SANITARY
'STREAM/WETLAND LOCATION MAP
SEWER LAYOUT PREPARED BY STIMMEL
ASSOCIATES, P.A. AND FIELD NOTES
LAP
PROPOSED SEWER LINE ALIGNMENT
PREPARED BY ECS PERSONNEL
MCLEANSVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA
NOT TO SCALE
CAROLINAS
ECS PROJECT NO. 09-19885

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
Q987 COE Wetlands Delmeation Manual)
Project/Site Proposed Sewer Line Alignment Knox Road Project No Date 06 /15/2011
Applicant/Owner Holder Construction Company County Guilford
Investigators ECS Carolinas, LLP 0919895 State North Carolina
Plot ID DP 1
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site9 Yes No Community ID Wooded
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation )9 Yes No Transect ID
Is the area a potential Problem Areas Yes No Field Location View Figure 3A
(If needed ex lam on the reverse side)
VEGk;JL'A'1'1UN
Dommant Plant S (Latm/Common)
Stratum
Indicator
Plant Species (Latin/Common)
Stratum
Indicator
Woodwardia areolata
Herb
OBL
Netted chandern
Acer saccharmum
Tree/Sap
FACW
Silver maple
Ulm is rubra
Tree/Sap
FAC
Red ehn
Fraxmus ylvamca
Tree/Sap
FACW
Green ash
Percent of Dommant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC) 100%
FAC Neutral. 100%
Numeric Index
Remarks
The dominant vegetation is hydro h tic
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks)
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
® No Recorded Data
Field Observations
Depth of Surface Water 0"
Depth to Free Water m Pit >12"
Depth to Saturated Soil >12'
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Primary Indicators
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sedunent Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators
Oxidized Root Channels m Upper 12 Inches
Water Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
FAC Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks
Wetland hydrology indicators are present.
(Wetforrn) Pagel of 2

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
[Project/Site
1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Proposed Sewer Line Abgnment Knox Road
Protect No Date 06 /15/2011
Applicant/Owner Holder Construction Company
County Guilford
Investigators ECS Carolmas, LLP
0919885 State North Carolina
Plot ID DP 1
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase) Chewacla loam
Map Symbol ChA
Mapped Hydric IncWston') ®Yes ❑ No
Drainage Class Somewhat poorly drained
Field Observations Confirm Ma T
Mapped Type ® Yes ❑ No
Taxonomy (Subgroup) Fluvaquenttc dystrudepts
Profile Dex don
Depth
Matrix Color
Mottle Color
Mottle
inches
Horizon
(Munsell Moist)
(Munsell Moist)
Abundance/Contrast
Texture, Concretions Structure etc.
0.6
10YR 4/6
0%
Loam
6-�
2.5Y 4/1
10YR 4/6
20%
Loam
T�
Hydnc Sod Indicators
❑ Histosol
❑ Concretions
❑ Hishc Epipedon
❑ Iligh Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
❑ Snlfidic Odor
❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
❑ Aquic Moisture Regime
❑ Listed on Local Hydnc SoOs List
❑ Reducing Conditions
❑ Listed on National Hydnc Soils List
Gleyed or Low Chroma Colors
❑ Other lam in Remarks)
Remarks
Hydnc soil indicators are present.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present' NYes ❑ No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetlands Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? 2SJYes ® No
Hydnc Sods Present? MYes n No
Remarks
The three wetland criteria are present. The sampling point is located within a wetland
(Wetform) Page 2 of 2

DATA FORM
Dominant Plant Species (Latm/Common)
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERNUNATION
Indicator
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual
Stratum
Project/Site Proposed Sewer Lme Alignment Knox Road
Project No
Date 06/15/2011
Applicant/Owner City of Greensboro
County Guilford
Investigators ECS Carohnas LLP
0919885
State North Carolina
Toxicodendron mdicans
Vine
Plot ID DP 2
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the sites Yes LJ No Community ID Wooded
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation )? Yes LXJ No Transect ID
Is the area a potential Problem Areas Hyes EJ No Field Location View Figure 3A
QE needed ex tam on the reverse side)
VL+'G TATION
Dominant Plant Species (Latm/Common)
Stratum
Indicator
Plant Species (Latm/Common)
Stratum
Indicator
siuense
Tree/Sa
FAC
Drift Lines
Chinese privet
Field Observations
Toxicodendron mdicans
Vine
FAC
Depth of Surface Water 0'
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Poison ivy
Depth to Free Water to Pit >IT
Uhuus rubra
Tree/Sap
FAC
Depth to Saturated Sod >12"
rl Other (E lam in Remarks)
Remarks
Red ehn
Framnus nns lvamca
Tree/Sap
FACW
Green ash
Lomcera japonica
Vine
FAC
Japanese honeysuckle
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC) 80%
FAC Neutral 50%
Numeric Index
Remarks
The dominant vegetation is hydrophytic
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
ary Indicators
Aerial Photographs
Inundated
Other
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
® No Recorded Data
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Field Observations
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators
Depth of Surface Water 0'
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Water Stained Leaves
Depth to Free Water to Pit >IT
Local Soil Survey Data
FAC Neutral Test
Depth to Saturated Sod >12"
rl Other (E lam in Remarks)
Remarks
Wetland hydrolog indicators are not present
(Wetform) Page 1 of 2

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site Proposed Sewer Lme Alignment Knox Road
Project No Date 06 115/2011
Apphcant/Owner City of Greensboro
County Guilford
Investigators ECS Carolmas LLP
0919885 State North Carolina
Plot ID DP 2
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase) Chewacla loam
Map Symbol ChA
Mapped Hydric Inclusion9 ®Yes ❑ No
Drainage Class Somewhat poorly drained
Field Observations Confirm Ma Yes
peed Type ❑ No
Taxonomy (Subgroup) Fluvaquentic dystrudepts
Profile Desc tion
Depth
Matrix Color
Mottle Color
Mottle
inches
Horizon
(MwiseU Moist)
Munsell Moist)
Abundance/Contrast
Texture Concretio Struc etc
0.6
10YR 4/6
2 5Y 4/3
30%
Loam
Hydric Sod Indicators
stosol
❑ HL
❑ Concretions
❑ Hishc Epipedon
❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
❑ Suffidic Odor
❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
❑ Aquic Moisture Regime
❑ Listed on Local Hydnc Soils List
❑ Reducing Conditions
❑ Listed on National Hydnc Soils Last
❑ Gle ed or Low Chroma Colors
Other lam in Remarks)
Remarks
Hydric soil indicators are not present.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophydc Vegetation Presents Yes No Is the Sampling Point within the Wetlands Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present9 Yes Z No
Hydric Soils Present?
❑Yes ER No
Remarks
Wetland hydrology and hydnc sod indicators are not present. The sampling point is not located within a wetland
(M-dorm) Page 2 of 2

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERNIINATION
1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site Proposed Sewer Line Alignment Knox Road Project No Date 06/15/2011
Apphcant/Owner City of Greensboro County Guilford
Investigators ECS Carolinas, LLP 0919885 State North Carolina
Plot ID DP 1
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the sites Yes No Community 1D Wooded
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation )? Yes No Transect ID
Is the area a potential Problem Areas HYes No Field Location View Figure 3A
If needed ex lam on the reverse side)
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant S (Latm/Common)
Stratum
Indicator
Plant S mes (Latm/Common)
Stratum
Indicator
Woodwardia areolata
Herb
OBL
Netted chamfern
Acer sac channum
Tree/Sap
FACW
Silver maple
Uhnus rubra
Tree/Sap
FAC
Red elm
Fraxmus Ivamca
TrWSaP
FACW
Green ash
Percent of Dommant Species that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC) 100%
FAC Neutral 100%
Numeric Index
Remarks
The dominant vestetation is h Zdro&tic
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks)
Stream, Lake or Tide Gauge
Aerial Photographs
Other
® No Recorded Data
Field Observations
Depth of Surface Water 0"
Depth to Free Water in Pmt >12"
Depth to Saturated Soil >12"
Wetland Hydrology Indicators
Primary Indicators
Inundated
Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Water Stained Leaves
Local Soil Survey Data
FAC Neutral Test
Other (E lam in Remarks)
Remarks
Wetland h drolo y indicators are present.
(Wetform) Page 1 of 2

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual
Project/Site Proposed Sewer Line Alignment Knox Road
Project No
Date 06 /15/2011
Apphcant/Owner City of Greensboro
County Guilford
Investigators ECS Carolinas, LLP
0919885
State North Carolina
Plot ID DP 1
Map Unit Name (Series and Phase) Chewacla loam
Map Symbol ChA
Mapped Hydnc InclusionP ®Yes [:]No
Drainage Class Somewhat poorly drained
Field Observations Confhfm Ma a
PPS Type ® Yes ❑ No
Taxonomy ( Subgroup) Fluvaguentic dystrudepts
Profile Description
Depth
Matrix Color
Mottle Color
Mottle
inches
Horizon
unsell Moist)
(Munsell Moist
Abundance/Contrast
Texture, Concretions. Struc etc
0.6
lOYR 4/6
0°k
Loam
612
2M 4/1
10YR 4/6
20%
Loam
Hydric Soil Indicators
❑ Hntosol
❑ Concretions
❑ Histic Epipedon
❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils
❑ Sulfithc Odor
❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
❑ Agntc Moisture Regime
❑ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
❑ Reducing Conditions
❑ Listed on National Hydric Sods List
Gle ed or Low Chroma Colors
Other lain in Remarks)
Remarks.
Hydnc soil in dicators are present.
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present' Yes
No
Is the Sampling Point within the Wetlands Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present' Yes I
I No
Hydric Soils Present? ®Yes
❑ No
Remarks
The three wetland cnterm are present. The sampling point is located within a wetland
(Wetform) Page 2 of 2

APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION FORM
US Army Corps of Engineers
This form should be completed by following the instructions provided in Section W of the JD Form Instructional Guidebook
SECTION 1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR APPROVED JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) May 29 2012
B DISTRICT OFFICE FILE NAME AND NUMBER Raleigh Proposed Sewer Ahgnment Knox Road, ECS Project No 09
19885
C. PROJECT LOCATION AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION
State NC County /pansh/borough Guilford City McLeansville
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format) Lat 36 070831 a Long 79 649264 f.
Universal Transverse Mercator
Name of nearest waterbody Little Alamance Creek
Name of nearest Traditional Navigable Water (TNW) Into which the aquatic resource flows Big Alamance Creek
Name of watershed or Hydrologic Unit Code (RUC) 03030002
Check if map /diagram of review area and/or potential jurisdictional areas is/are available upon request
Check if other sites (e g offsite mitigation sites disposal sites etc ) are associated with this action and are recorded on a
different JD form
D REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
Office (Desk) Determination Date
Field Determination Date(s) September 1 2011
SECTION H, SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
A RHA SECTION 10 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION
There navigable waters of the US within Rivers and Harbors Act (RHA) junsdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 329) m the
review area [Required)
Waters subject to the ebb and flow of the ude
Waters are presently used or have been used in the past or may be susceptible for use to transport interstate or foreign commerce
Explain
B CWA SECTION 404 DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION
There 0 waters of the US within Clean Water Act (CWA) Jurisdiction (as defined by 33 CFR part 328) in the review area [Required]
1 Waters of the U S
a. Indicate presence of waters of US in review area (check all that apply) i
TNWs including territorial seas
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs
Relatively permanent waters (RPWs) that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Non RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Wetlands adjacent to non RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters
® Isolated (interstate or intrastate) waters including isolated wetlands
b Identify (estimate) size of waters of the US m the review area
Non wetland waters 2 000 linear feet 7 width (ft) and/or 0 32 acres
Wetlands 5 acres
c. Lmuts (boundaries) of jurisdiction based on IW- - 7MpliQio0A" s!
Elevation of established OHWM (if known) Unknown
2. Non regulated waters /wetlands (check if applicable) 3
® Potentially jurisdictional waters and/or wetlands were assessed within the review area and determined to be not jurisdictional
Explain
Boxes checked below shall be supported by completing the appropriate sections in Section III below
z For purposes of this form an RFW is defined as a tributary that is not a TNW and that typically flows year round or has continuous flow at least seasonally
(e g typically 3 months)
Supporting documentation is presented in Section III F

SECTION III CWA ANALYSIS
A. TNWs AND WETLANDS ADJACENT TO TNWs
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over TNWs and wetlands adjacent to TNWs N the aquatic resource is a TNW complete
Section III A 1 and Section I1LD 1 only if the aquatic resource is a wetland adjacent to a TNW complete Sechoac III A 1 and 2
and Section E L.D 1 otherwise see Section 1H.B below
1 TNW
Identify TNW
Summarize rationale supporting determination
2. Wetland adjacent to TNW
Summarize rationale supporting conclusion that wetland is adjacent
B CHARACTERISTICS OF TRIBUTARY (THAT IS NOT A TNW) AND ITS ADJACENT WETLANDS (IF ANY)
This section summarizes information regarding characteristics of the tributary and its adjacent wetlands, if any and it helps
determine whether or not the standards for jurisdiction established under Rayianos have been met.
The agencies will assert jurisdiction over non - navigable tributaries of TNWs where the tributaries are "relatively permanent
waters' (RPWs) ie tributaries that typically allow year round or have continuous flow at least seasonally (e.g typically 3
months) A wetland that directly abuts an RPW is also jurisdictional. Nthe aquatic resource is not a TNW but has year round
( perenmal) flow skip to Section M D.2 N the aquatic resource is a wetland directly abutting a tributary with perennial flow
slap to Section M.D 4
A wetland that is adjacent to but that does not dnwdy abut an RPW requires a sig»>gcant nexus evaluation. Corps districts and
EPA regions will include in the record any available information that documents the existence of a significant nezus between a
relatively permanent tributary that is not perennial (and its adjacent wetlands dany) and a traditional navigable water even
though a significant nexus Ruding is not required as a matter of law
U the waberbody° is not an RPW or a wetland directly abutting an RPW a JD whII regain additional data to determine if the
waterbody has a significant nexus with a TNW If the tributary has adjacent wetlands, the sigmficant nexus evaluation most
consider the tributary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands. This significant nexus evaluation that combines, for
analytical purposes, the tributary and ail of its adjacent wetlands is used whether the review area identified in the JD request is
the tributary or its adjacent wetlands, or both. If the JD covers a tributary with adjacent wetlands, couVete Section IILB 1 for
the tributary Section MX.2 for any onsite wetlands, and Section HLB.3 for all wetlands adjacent to that tributary both onsite
and offsite The determination whether a significant nexus exists is determined in Section III C below
I Characteristics of non TNWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(i) General Area Conditions
Watershed size 4 000
Drainage area 4 000 +
Average annual rainfall 42 7 inches
Average annual snowfall 9 1 inches
(u) Physical Characteristics
(a) Relattonship with TNW
❑ Tributary flows directly into TNW
® Tributary flows through $ tributaries before entering TNW
Project waters are river miles from TN W
Project waters are river miles from RPW
Project waters are Cae:r,.,l ( straight) miles from TNW
Project waters are aerial (straight) miles from RPW
Project waters cross or serve as state boundaries Explain
Identify flow route to TNWS The unnamed tributaries that cross the site flow into Little Alamance Creek which flows
into Big Alamance Creek which flows into the Haw River and then the Cape Fear
Note that the Instructional Guidebook contains additional tiformanon regarding swales ditches washes and erosional features generally and m the and
West
5 Flow route can be described by identifying e g tributary a which flows through the review area to flow into tributary b which then flows into TNW

purposes
Tributary stream order if known Second
(b) General Tributary Characteristics (check all that apply)
Tributary is ® Natural
❑ Artificial (man made) Explain
® Manipulated (man altered) Explain Some areas have been historically altered for agricultural
Tnbutary properties with respect to top of bank (estimate)
Average width 7 feet
Average depth 7 feet
Average side slopes 11-1 U -
Primary tributary substrate composition (check all that apply)
® Silts ® Sands ❑ Concrete
® Cobbles ® Gravel ® Muck
® Bedrock ® Vegetation Type/% cover 80
❑ Other Explain
Tributary condition/stability fe g highly eroding sloughing banks] Explain Relatively stable
Presence of run/riffle/pool complexes Explain Moderate amount of nffle pool complexes
Tributary geometry
Tributary gradient (approximate average slope) 13 %
(t) Flow
Tributary provides for Nifflo
Estimate average number of flow events in review area/year iffimlgwo
Describe flow regime Constant.
Other information on duration and volume
Surface flow is "' Charactenstics
Subsurface flow Explain findings
❑ Dye (or other) test performed
Tributary has (check all that apply)
® Bed and banks
® OHWM6 (check all indicators that apply)
® clear natural line impressed on the bank
® changes in the character of soil
❑
® shelving
® vegetation matted down bent or absent
® leaf litter disturbed or washed away
® sediment deposition
® aster twining
❑ other (list)
❑ Discontinuous OHWM' Explain
the presence of litter and debris
destruction of terrestrial vegetation
the presence of wrack line
sediment sorting
scour
multiple observed or predicted flow events
abrupt change in plant community
If factors other than the OHWM were used to determine lateral extent of CWA jurisdiction (check all that apply)
® High Tide Line indicated by ® Mean High Water Mark indicated by
❑ oil or scum line along shore objects ❑ survey to available datum
❑ fine shell or debris deposits (foreshore) ❑ physical markings
❑ physical markings/characteristics ❑ vegetation lines/changes in vegetation types
❑ tidal gauges
❑ other (list)
(m) Chemical Characteristics
Characterize tributary (e g water color is clear discolored oily film water quality general watershed characteristics etc)
Explain Water color is relatively clear There are sediment deposits
Identify specific pollutants if known No sheens observed
6A natural or man made discontinuity in the OHWM does not necessanly sever junsdiction (e g where the stream temporarily flows underground or where
the OHWM has been removed by development or agricultural practices) Where there is a break in the OHWM that is unrelated to the wdterbody s flow
regime (e g flow over a rock outcrop or through a culvert) the agencies will look for indicators of flow above and below the break
'Ibid.

(iv) Biological Characteristics Channel supports (check all that apply)
® Riparian corridor Characteristics (type average width) The undeveloped land located adjacent to the streams vanes
between bottomland hardwood to low lying herbaceous shrubs
® Wetland fringe Characteristics There are wetland fringes that result from groundwater seeps
® Habitat for
❑ Federally Listed species Explain findings
❑ Fish/spawn areas Explain findings
❑ Other environmentally sensitive species Explain findings
® Aquatic /wildlife diversity Explain findings Crayfish minnows salamanders frogs and macro invertebrates were
observed
Z Charactenstics of wetlands adjacent to non TNW that flow directly or indirectly into TNW
(r) Physical Characteristics
(a) General Wetland Characteristics
Properties
Wetland size 5acres
Wetland type Explain Various types, primarily bottomland hardwoods
Wetland quality Explain Various moderate to good in most areas
Project wetlands cross or serve as state boundaries Explain
(b) General Flow Rel&Uons4lp with on TNW
Flow is 61190M Explain Saturated to surface
Surface flow is
Characteristics No surface flow
Subsurface flow U11MM Explain findings
❑ Dye (or other) test performed
(c) Wetland Adiacencv Determination with Non TNW
® Directly abutting
® Not directly abutting
® Discrete wetland hydrologic connection Explam. Adjacent to streams or other direct connection to streams
and/or drainage features _
❑ Ecological connection Explain
❑ Separated by berm/bamer Explain
(d) Proximity (Relatio nshi to TNW
Project wetlands are river rmles from TNW
Project waters are aeri al (straight) miles from TNW
Flow is froi 'N
Estimate approximate location of wetland as within the $!NQ
IM floodplain
(h) Chenucal Characteristics
Characterize wetland system (e g water color is clear brown oil film on surface water quality general watershed
characteristics etc ) Explain Water color is clear in areas where it is present
Identify specific pollutants, if known Unknown
(iii) Biological Characteristics Wetland supports (check all that apply)
®
Riparian buffer Characteristics (type average width) At least 50 feet wide in most areas
® Vegetation type/percent cover Explain Bottomland hardwoods and herbaceous 50-85% in most areas
® Habitat for
❑ Federally Listed species Explain findings
❑ Fish/spawn areas Explain findings
❑ Other environmentally sensitive species Explain findings
® Aquatic /wildlife diversity Explain findings Crayfish and amphibians
Characteristics of all wetlands adjacent to the tributary (if an
All wetland(s) being considered in the cumulative analysis &�
Approximately ( 5 ) acres in total are being considered in the cumulative analysis

For each wetland specify the following
ptrecdY abuts'? (YiN) Size (in acre5l 121MC11YAW".71YIN Size (in acres)
y All Total of 5 Acres
Summarize overall biological chemical and physical functions being performed The wetlands on the site function to
filter and control surface water runnoff The provide habitat for aquatic species The add to the diversity of the ecosystem at the
site
C SIGNIFICANT NEXUS DETERMINATION
A significant nexus analysts win assess the flow characteristics and funchons of the tributary itself and the functions performed
by any wetlands adjacent to the tributary to determme if they sigmficaudy affect the chemical physical and biological udegrdy
of a TNW For each of the following situations, a stgmfic ant nexus exists if the tributary m combination with all of its adjacent
wetlands has more than a speculative or insubstantial effect on the chemical, physical and/or biological mtegnty of a TNW
Considerations when evaluating sWillficaut nexus include, but are not hmited to the volume, duration, and frequency of the flow
of water m the tributary and its proxmnty to a TNW and the functions performed by the tributary and all its adjacent
wetlands It is not appropriate to determine sigttificant nexus based solely on any specific threshold of distance (e.g between a
tributary and its adjacent wetland or between a tributary and the TNW) Similarly the fact an adjacent wetland lies within or
outside of a floodplain is not solely determinative of significant nexus.
Draw connections between the features documented and the effects on the TNW as identified in the Rapanos Guidance and
discussed in the Instruchonal Gwdeboolc. Factors to consider mdude, for example
• Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any) have the capacity to carry pollutants or flood waters to
TNWs or to reduce the amount of pollutants or flood waters reaching a TNW
• Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any) provide habitat and hfecycie support functions for fish and
other species such as feeding nesting spawning, or rearing young for species that are present in the TNW?
• Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any) have the capacity to transfer nutrients and organic cation that
support downstream foodwebs?
• Does the tributary in combination with its adjacent wetlands (if any) have other relationships to the physical chemical or
biological mtegnty of the TNW9
Note. the above hst of considerations is not inclusive and other functions observed or known to occur should be documented
below
1 Sigmficant nexus findings for non RPW that has no adjacent wetlands and flows directly or mdirectly mto TNWs Explain
findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below based on the tributary itself then go to Section III D
Smgmfieant nexus findings for non RPW and its adjacent wetlands where the non RPW flows duvWy or indirectly into
TNWs Explain findings of presence or absence of significant nexus below based on the tributary to combination with all of its
adjacent wetlands then go to Section III D They are connected directly to RPWs on this site
Significant nexus findings for wetlands adjacent to an RPW but that do not dwectly abut the RPW Explain findings of
presence or absence of significant nexus below based on the tnbutary in combination with all of its adjacent wetlands then go to
Section III D The wetlands are located in the floodplams adjacent to the streams and in other areas are connected by non
junsdictional drainage features
DETERMINATIONS OF JURISDICTIONAL FINDINGS THE SUBJECT WATERS/WETLANDS ARE (CHECK ALL
THAT APPLY)
I TNWs and Adjacent Wetlands Check all that apply and provide size estimates in review area
TNWs linear feet width (ft) Or acres
Wetlands adjacent to TNWs acres
RPWs that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs
Tributaries of TNWs where tributaries typically flow year round are jurisdictional Provide data and rationale indicating that
tributary is perennial Crayfish salamanders frogs iron oxidizing bacteria substrate sorting riffle pool complexes and
ordinary high water mark were observed

Tributaries of TNW where tributaries have continuous flow seasonally (e g typically three months each year) are
jurisdictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III B Provide rationale indicating that tributary flows
seasonally Some areas of the streams are intermittent They connect directly to perennial streams
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply)
Tributary waters 2 000 linear feet 7 width (ft)
Other non wetland waters acres
Identify type(s) of waters
Non RPWss that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
Waterbody that is not a TNW or an RPW but flows directly or indirectly into a TNW and it has a significant nexus with a
TNW is jurisdictional Data supporting this conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide estimates for jurisdictional waters within the review area (check all that apply)
® Tributary waters linear feet width (ft)
Other non wetland waters acres
Identify type(s) of waters
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or mdwecdy into TNWs.
® Wetlands directly abut RPW and thus are jurisdictional as adjacent wetlands
® Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow year round Provide data and rationale
indicating that tributary is perennial in Section iII D 2 above Provide rationale indicating that wetland is
directly abutting an RPW Physically connected or connected by a draimage feature or floodplain Hydrology
Wetlands directly abutting an RPW where tributaries typically flow seasonally Provide data indicating that tributary is
seasonal in Section Ill B and rationale in Section ULD 2 above Provide rationale indicating that wetland is directly
abutting an RPW Physically connected or connected by a drainage feature or floodplam hydrology
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area Sacres
Wetlands adjacent to but not directly abutting an RPW that flow directly or indirectly into TNWs.
IN Wetlands that do not directly abut an RPW but when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent
and with similarly situated adjacent wetlands, have a significant nexus with a TNW are junsidictional Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide acreage estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area acres
6. Wetlands adjacent to non RPWs that flow directly or mduwdy into TNWs
E] Wetlands adjacent to such waters and have when considered in combination with the tributary to which they are adjacent and
with similarly situated adjacent wetlands have a significant nexus with a TNW are jurisdictional Data supporting this
conclusion is provided at Section III C
Provide estimates for jurisdictional wetlands in the review area acres
Impoundments of jurisdictional waters 9
As a general rule the impoundment of a junsdictional tributary remains jurisdictional
Demonstrate that impoundment was created from waters of the U S or
Demonstrate that water meets the criteria for one of the categories presented above (1-6) or
Demonstrate that water is isolated with a nexus to commerce (see E below)
ISOLATED [INTERSTATE OR INTRA STATE] WATERS INCLUDING ISOLATED WETLANDS THE USE
DEGRADATION OR DESTRUCTION OF WHICH COULD AFFECT INTERSTATE COMMERCE INCLUDING ANY
SUCH WATERS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) 10
® which are or could be used by interstate or foreign travelers for recreational or other purposes
'See Footnote # 3
9 To complete the analysis refer to the key in Section III D 6 of the Instructional Guidebook
10 Prior to asserting or declining CWA jurisdiction based solely on this category Corps Districts will elevate the action to Corps and EPA HQ for
review consistent with the process described in the Corps(EPA Memorandum Regarding CWA Act Jurisdiction Following Rapanos

from which fish or shellfish are or could be taken and sold in interstate or foreign commerce
which are or could be used for industrial purposes by industries in interstate commerce
Interstate isolated waters Explain
Other factors Explain
Identify water body and summarize rationale supporting deterimnation.
Provide estimates for Juiisdictional waters in the review area (check all that apply)
Tributary waters 2 000 linear feet7width (ft)
Other non wetland waters acres
Identify type(s) of waters
Wetlands 5acres
F NON JURISDICTIONAL WATERS INCLUDING WETLANDS (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
© If potential wetlands were assessed within the review area, these areas did not meet the criteria in the 1987 Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and/or appropriate Regional Supplements
❑ Review area included isolated waters with no substantial nexus to interstate (or foreign) commerce
❑ Prior to the Jan 2001 Supreme Court decision m SWANCC the review area would have been regulated based solely on the
Migratory Bird Rule (MBR)
Waters do not meet the Significant Nexus standard where such a finding is required for jurisdiction Explain
Other (explain if not covered above)
Provide acreage estimates for non Jurisdictional waters in the review area where the sole potential basis of Jurisdiction is the MBR
factors (i a presence of migratory birds presence of endangered species use of water for irrigated agriculture) using best professional
udgment (check ail that apply)
Non wetland waters (t a rivers streams) lmear feet width (ft)
Lakes/ponds acres
Other non wetland waters acres List type of aquatic resource
Wetlands acres
Provide acreage estimates for non Jurisdictional waters in the review area that do not meet the "Significant Nexus standard where such
a finding is required for Jurisdiction (check all that apply)
Non wetland waters (i a rivers streams) linear feet, width (ft)
Lakes/ponds acres
Other non wetland waters acres List type of aquatic resource
Wetlands acres
SECTION IV DATA SOURCES
A SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for JD (check all that apply checked items shall be included in case file and where checked
and requested, appropriately reference sources below)
Maps plans plots or plat subrrutted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultant
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the applicant/consultarit
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report
® Data sheets prepared by the Corps
® Corps navigable waters study
® U S Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas
❑ USGS NHD data
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps
®U S Geological Survey map(s) Cite scale & quad name McLeansville 1 =2 000
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey Citation Guilford County NCSS Website
® National wetlands inventory maps) Cite name
❑ State/Local wetland inventory map(s)
® FEMA/FIRM maps 3710880400)
100 year Floodplain Elevation is (National Geodectic Vertical Datum of 1929)
® Photographs ® Aerial (Name & Date) GPS Map / Aenal Photo Dated 2009
or ❑ Other (Name & Date)
❑ Previous determination(s) File no and date of response letter
❑ Applicable/supporting case law
® Applicable /supporting scientific literature
® Other information (please specify) Verification on portion of the site on September 1 2010

B ADDITIONAL COMMENTS TO SUPPORT JD There are multiple streams and wetlands on the site The majority of the streams are
perennial Potyions of the site were verified by Mr Andy Williams with the U S Army Corps of Engineers and Ms Sue Homewood with the
North Carolina Division of Water Quality on September 1 2010 Permits are required from the USACE and DWQ for impacts to the streams
and wetlands

PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS AND
LAND OWNERS
Proposed Sewer Line
Knox Road/Stewart Mill Area
PIN
OWNER
8804838615
Burch Creek Farm LLC
8813099404
City of Greensboro
8803987963
Sasco 2008 C2 MBD Holding, LLC
8814015241
Land Port Investments, LLC
8814029261
Land Port Investments LLC
8804921160
Land Port Investments LLC
8804936214
Land Port Investments LLC
8804926657
Thomas and Vicla Smith
8814036836
Heather and Patrick Forbis
8804931119
William and Ellen Hefner
8804932626
Edward and Martha Allred
• The parcel and owner information shown in the above table was obtained
from the Guilford County GIS Websde Portions of parcels not listed will be
crossed by the proposed sewer line, however are not identifiable features
on the Guilford County GIS website
• The City of Greensboro is currently in the process of acquiring the
easements required for the proposed sewer line Individual land owners
should NOT be contacted concerning regulatory Issues All
comments conversations and correspondence concerning regulatory
information should be directed to the City of Greensboro and/or ECS
Carolinas LLP

HARP
F1A9rTAT ASSESSMENT 3 RESTORATIOPi PROfESS10NAtS
301 McCullough Drive Suite 460
Charlotte NC 28262
Office 704 841 2841
Fax [phone]
Environmental Assessment of the Knox Road Area Outfall for the Possible Occurrence of the
Small Whorled Pogonia Usotna medeoloides) in the Vidnity of Greensboro, NC (Glbsonville)
The Small Whorled Pogonla occurs in the western portion of North Carolina in the South
Mountains of Burke County (South Mountains State Park), and southwestward in Rutherford
Transylvania McDowell Jackson and Cherokee counties Historically, with records over 50
years old it has been known from Guilford Harnett and Surry counties The recent discovery of
a single plant in eastern Guilford County on Frieden Church Rd has stirred considerable
interest in determining the potential in this area for other populations of the species The Knox
Road outfall lies about six air miles southwest of the occurrence on Frieden Church Rd Because
of this proximity, the U S Fish and Wddlde Service requested a biological assessment of the
proposed sewer Right -of Way (ROW) See the attached map Figure 1 for the site of the
proposed outfall
The field work was performed on May 16, 2012 Prior to examining the outfall site a visit was
made to the site on Frieden Church Rd where the owner showed us the area and discussed
how the site was cleared which led to the discovery of the plant David Campbell, the other
botanist in this study has been monitoring the populations of the Small Whorled Pogonia in the
South Mountains for the past ten years He wanted to compare the habitats in Burke County
with the one In Guilford County In general the commonalities area mixture of pine and
hardwood species on a relatively moist but not nutrient rich soil The pine species differ in
that In Burke County it is the White Pine (Anus strobus) and in Guilford the Short leaf Pine
(Prnus echinata) With these mental images, the sewer line ROW was walked following the
flags of the surveyors The disturbance of the ROW has been minimal, with little clearing
Woody vegetation has been cut only to permit the surveying
The project begins at 140 85 as Little Alamance Creek crosses under the Interstate It follows
the east safe of the creek, passing through a young forest recovering from clear cutting There
are a few Loblolly Pines (Prnus toeda) 6 8 inches diameter breast height (dbh) but most of the
trees are early secondary successional hardwood species in the 3 4 in dbh range The ROW
passes along a slope above the creek as there are considerable wetlands at the toe of the slope
1

i
Continuing further north above the wetlands the slope is unusual in having bottomland species
growing on it including Bitternut Hickory (Carya corchformis)14 in dbh, Yellow Poplar
(Llnodendron tullpifera)13 in dbh Black Walnut (luglans nigra) 10 in dbh and Ironwood
(Carpinus Carolinians) 5 in dbh
After crossing a tributary flowing in from the northeast, the ROW remains out of the floodplain
due to the wetlands in the floodplain The forest has been less disturbed, with Sycamore
(Plotanus occldentahs) 33 in dbh Beech (Fagus grandifolia) 26 in dbh Northern Red Oak
(Quercus rubra) 13 in dbh and White Oak (Quercus alba) 12 In dbh
The ROW crosses Little Alamance Creek to the west side passing through a dense floodplain
forest on the terrace above the creek The dominant species are Beech 27 In dbh Yellow
Poplar 14 in dbh, Red Maple (Acer rubrum) 12 in dbti Black Walnut 11 in dbh and Black
Cherry 10 in dbh and Southern Sugar Maple (Acer floridenum) S in dbh Along the stream
bank is Pinxter flower (Rhododendron perrtlymenoides) and a good herbaceous growth of
Golden Ragwort (Packers aurea) Most of the understory is a thick growth of both Autumn
Olive (Elaeagnus umbellate) and Autumn Sdverberry (Elaeagnus pungens) In areas where the
Elaeagnus is not as dense seedlings of the dominant species constitute the understory
Crossing a tributary from the west, the ROW enters an elongated open meadow dominated by
grasses and numerous common herbaceous species and then passes through a thin woods of
the same species as noted above as the ROW crosses Little Alamance Creek again, to the north
side
Emerging from the floodplain on the north side, the ROW parallels a driveway /small power line
ROW dominated by secondary succession species emerging on to Knox Rd
Crossing Knox Rd the ROW lust west of a hay field, passes through a floodplain woods with
some rock outcrops The dominant trees are Yellow Poplar 13 in dbh White Oak in dbh and
Mockernut Hickory (Carya tomentosa) 9 in dbh The herbaceous vegetation in the floodplain
supports several species of grasses Wild Onion (Alllum canadense var canadense) Jack in the
Pulpit (Ansaema triphy/lum ssp triphyllum) and Green Dragon (Arrsaemo dracontium) The
ROW then turns NW and crosses Lithe Alamance Creek paralleling the west side of the creek in
the floodplain woods The character of this floodplain changes due to past management where
fields have encroached into the floodplain The dominant species include Yellow Poplar 26 in
dbh River Birch (Betula nigra) 16 in dbh, White Oak 17 In dbh, Sweet Gum (Uqurdambar
styraciflua) 15 in dbh Sugarberry (Celtic laevigata) 13 in dbh Black Walnut 10 in dbh
Mockernut Hickory 10 in dbh Beech 10 in dbh Ironwood 9 in dbh with additional
components of the understory being Pawpaw (Asrmina triloibo), Dogwood (Cornus florida)
Black Cherry Red Mulberry (Mores rubra) and Box Elder (Acer negundo)
2

The ROW crosses a small tributary after emerging from an abandoned disturbed field and upon
entering the floodpiain forest (as described above) crosses Little Alamance Creek to terminate
in a disturbed floodplaEn forest on the north side of the creek and west of a tributary entering
the main creek
In comparing the orchid habitat with the habitats present in this sewer project there is no
comparable habitat in the sewer project area The combination of pines and hardwood species
is not present and in general the fioodpiain vegetation is too dense for the orchid because of
the nutrient rich sods
A/
�iirri atthew Ph D
- le�L
David Campbell .S
�j

p r �
@ ; t
�r
r
t
i
t
frw
� � f
e �
Y1
V,6
yl
fie k t
� t �
I
lilt!
p r �
@ ; t
�r
r
t
i
t
frw
� � f
e �
Y1
V,6
yl
fie k t
� t �
I