NC0050105_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20200221

ROY COOPER_
Gova7wr �' �
MICHAEL S. REGAN Rn
Secretary
S. DANIEL SMITH NORTH CAROLINA
Director Environmental Quality
February 21, 2020
Mick Noland
Fayetteville Public Works Commission
PO Box 1089
Fayetteville, NC 28302-1089
SUBJECT: Compliance Inspection Report
Rockfish Creek WWTP
NPDES WW Permit No. NCO050105
Cumberland County
Dear Permittee:
The North Carolina Division of Water Resources conducted an inspection of the Rockfish Creek WWTP
on 2/12/2020. This inspection was conducted to verify that the facility is operating in compliance with
the conditions and limitations specified in NPDES WW Permit No. NC0050105. The findings and
comments noted during this inspection are provided in the enclosed copy of the inspection report
entitled "Compliance Inspection Report".
There were no significant issues or findings noted during the inspection and therefore, a response to this
inspection report is not required.
No rth Carolina Depart rnent of Envconrnental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Fayetteviffe Regionai Office 1225 Green Street, Suite 714 I Fayetteville, North Carofna 25301
914433 3390

If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact Hughie White with the Water
Quality Regional Operations Section in the Fayetteville Regional Office at 910-433-3300.
Sincerely,
EDocuSigned by:
✓MAAR "I
E4E1A9691DB248E—
Mark Brantley, Asst. Regional Supervisor
Water Quality Regional Operations Section
Fayetteville Regional Office
Division of Water Resources, NCDEQ
ATTACHMENTS
Cc: WQS Fayetteville Regional Office (HW)
North Carolina Department of Enwonrnental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Fayett"ifle Regionsi Dffice 1 225 Green Street, Suite 714 1 Fayetteville, North Carofna 28301
914433 3390

United States Environmental Protection Agency
E rig p A Washington, D.C. 20460
Water Compliance Inspection Report
Form Approved.
OMB No. 2040-0057
Approval expires 6-31-98
Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS)
Transaction
1 ILJJ
Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type • Inspector Fac Type
2 LI 3 I NC0050105 I11 12 I 20/02/12 117 18 IA, 19 I S I 20
211 I
I I I I I
I
I I II I I I I I I I I
I
I
I.I I
I I
I I I I I
I I I II I I I I t 166
`
Reserved
Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring
67I I 70
I
Evaluation Rating
I 711
61
I 72
QA
I N I
731
I
174.71
I
I
I I I I
I80
. Section B: Facility Data
Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, also include
POTW name and NPDES permit Number)
Entry Time/Date
10:60AM• . '20/02/12
Permit Effective Date
.17/11/01
Rockfish Creek WVVfP
2536 Tracey Hall Rd
Fayetteville NC 28306
Exit Time/Date
01:OOPM 20/02/12
Permit Expiration Date •
21/10/31
Name(s) of Onsite Representative(s)/Titles(s)/Phone and Fax Number(s)
///
Michael Scott McCoy/ORC/910-223-4757/
Other Facility Data
Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number
Contacted
Mick J Noland, PO Box 1089 Fayetteville NC 283021089/1910-223-4733/
No
; A
Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated) ,
Permit • Flow Measurement Operations & Maintenance • Records/Reports
Self -Monitoring Program Sludge Handling Disposal Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters'
Laboratory
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
(See attachment summary)
Name(s) and Signature(s)
Hughie White
of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
�oaeusigned by: DWR/FRO WQ/910-433-3300 Ext.708/
WAG 2/21/2020
'-49E06C60007E432...
Signature of Manage
Mark Brantley
gotIkigokeepi �( Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date
I t f aiA6Mt/FRO WQ/910-433-3300 Ext.727/ 2/24/2020
C1'tAG^P1GG21°C
EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete.
Page# 1

NPDES
NC0050105
111 121
yr/mo/day
20/02/12
17
Inspection Type
18 LC]
(Cont.)
1
Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary)
All records and log books were very well organized and maintained. The ORC'visitation log appeared
to be complete and current. A copy of the NPDES permit and the previous years annual report were
available for review. Laboratory data was. reviewed and all data appeared to be correct, as reported on
the DMR's. Calibration records for equipment appeared to be properly documented. A field parameter
certification inspection was performed during this visit, as well. The whole facility was very clean and
well maintained. All treatment units appeared to be in very good condition and. the effluent was very
clear at the time of this inspection.
Page# 2

Permit: NC0050105
Inspection Date: 02/12/2020
Owner - Facility: Rockfish Creek WWTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Operations & Maintenance
Is the plant generally clean with acceptable housekeeping?
Does the facility analyze process control parameters, for ex: MLSS, MCRT, Settleable
Solids,. pH, DO, Sludge Judge, and other that are applicable?
Comment: -
Permit
(If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new
application?
Is the facility as described in the permit?
# Are there any special conditions for the permit?
Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public?
Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection?
Comment:
Record Keeping
Are records kept and maintained as required by the permit?
Is all required information readily available, complete and current?
Are all records maintained for 3 years (lab. reg. required 5 years)?
Are analytical results consistent with data reported on DMRs?
Is the chain -of -custody complete?
Dates, times and location of sampling
Name of individual performing the sampling
Results of analysis and calibration
Dates of analysis
Name of person performing analyses
Transported COCs
Are DMRs complete: do they include all permit parameters?
Has the facility submitted its annual compliance report to users and DWQ?
(If the facility is = or > 5 MGD permitted flow) Do they operate 24/7 with a certified operator
on each shift?
Is the ORC visitation log available and current?
Is the ORC certified at grade equal to or higher than the facility classification?
Is the backup operator certified at one grade less or greater than the facility classification?
Is a copy of the current NPDES permit available on site? -
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
▪ ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ IN ❑
❑ ❑ ❑
MI ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
▪ ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑.
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ •
▪ ❑ ❑ ❑
11 ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
MO ❑ ❑
MO ❑ ❑
Page# 3

Permit: NC0050105 Owner - Facility: Rockfish Creek WVVTP
Inspection Date: 02/12/2020 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Record Keeping
Facility has copy of previous year's Annual Reportonfile for review?
Comment:
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Pump Station - Influent Yes- No NA NE
Is the pump wet well free of bypass lines or structures? . • ❑ 0 0
Is the wet well free of excessive grease? • ❑ ❑ ❑
Are all pumps present? • 0 0 0
Are all pumps operable? • ❑ 0 0
Are float controls operable? • 0 0 0
Is SCADA telemetry available and. operational? • 0 0 ❑
Is audible and visual alarm available and operational? 0 0 0 II
Comment:
Bar Screens
Type of bar screen
a.Manual
b.Mechanical
Are the bars adequately screening debris?
Is the screen free of excessive debris?
Is disposal of screening in compliance?
Is the unit in good condition?
Comment:
Grit Removal
Type of grit removal
a.Manual
b.Mechanical
Is the grit free of excessive organic matter?
Is the grit free of excessive odor?
# Is disposal of grit in compliance?
Comment:
Aeration Basins
Yes No NA NE
•
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
11 ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
0
•
▪ ❑ ❑ ❑
▪ ❑ ❑ ❑
MI ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
Page# 4

Permit: NC00501 05
Inspection Date: 02/12/2020
Owner - Facility: Rockfish Creek VWVTP
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Aeration Basins
Mode of operation
Type of aeration system
Is the basin free of dead spots?.
Are surface aerators and mixers operational?
Are the diffusers operational?
Is the foam the proper color for the treatment process?
Does the foam cover less than 25% of the basin's surface?
Is the DO level acceptable?
Is the DO level acceptable?(1.0 to 3.0 mg/I)
Comment:
Secondary Clarifier
Is the clarifier free of black and odorous wastewater?
Is the site free of excessive buildup of solids in center well of circular clarifier?
Are weirs level?
Is the site free of weir blockage?
Is the site free of evidence of short-circuiting?
Is scum removal adequate?
Is the site free of excessive floating sludge?
Is the drive unit operational? •
Is the return rate acceptable (low turbulence)?
Is the overflow clear of excessive solids/pin floc? _
Is the sludge blanket level acceptable? (Approximately % of the sidewall depth)
Comment:
Filtration (High Rate Tertiary)
Type of operation:
Is the filter media present?
Is the. filter surface free of clogging?
Is the filter free of growth?
Is the air scour operational?
Is the scouring acceptable?
Is the clear well free of excessive solids and filter media?
Yes No NA 'NE
Ext. Air
Diffused
M ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
ND ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ '❑
ID [ID
••❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
▪ ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
Down flow
• ❑ ❑ ❑
1.000
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ 1
❑ ❑ ❑ .
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Page# 5

Permit: NC0050105 Owner - Facility: Rockfish Creek WWTP
Inspection Date: 02/12/2020 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Filtration (High Rate Tertiary)
Comment:
Disinfection -Liquid
Is there adequate reserve supply of disinfectant?
(Sodium Hypochlorite) Is pump feedsystem operational?
Is bulk storage tank containment area adequate? (free of leaks/open drains)
Is the level of chlorine residual acceptable?
Is the contact chamber free of growth, or sludge buildup?
Is there chlorine residual prior to de -chlorination?
Comment:
De -chlorination
Type of system ?
Is the feed ratio proportional to chlorine amount (1 to 1)?
Is storage appropriate for cylinders?
# Is de -chlorination substance stored away from chlorine containers?
Comment:
Are the tablets the proper size and type?
Are tablet de -chlorinators operational?
Number of tubes in use?
Comment:
Aerobic Digester
Is the capacity adequate?
Is the mixing adequate?
Is the site free of excessive foaming in the tank?
# Is the odor acceptable?
# Is tankage available for properly waste sludge?
Comment:
Flow Measurement - Effluent
# Is flow meter used for reporting?
Is flow meter calibrated annually?
Yes No NA NE
Yes No NA NE
11 ❑ ❑ ❑
11000
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ Q ❑
11 ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
-Liquid
11 ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ MI ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ 11 ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ ❑ ❑ MI
❑ ❑ OM
❑ ❑ ❑ •
• ❑ ❑ ❑
▪ ❑ ❑ ❑
Yes No NA NE
▪ ❑ ❑ ❑
11 ❑ ❑ ❑
Page# 6

Permit: NC0050105 Owner - Facility: Rockfish Creek WWTP
Inspection Date: 02/12/2020
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Flow Measurement - Effluent
Is the flow meter operational?
(If units are separated) Does the chart recorder match the flow meter?
Comment: The flow meter is calibrated quarterly.
Standby Power
Is automatically activated standby power available?
Is the generator tested by interrupting primary power source?
Is the generator tested under load? -
Was generator tested & operational during the inspection?
Do the generator(s) have adequate capacity to operate the entire wastewater site?
Is there an emergency agreement with a fuel vendor for extended run on back-up power?
Is the generator fuel level monitored?
Comment:
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑•❑
Yes No NA NE.
MO On
INIE100
• ❑ ❑ ❑
O 00.
• ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ ❑ •
❑ ❑ ❑ .
Influent Sampling Yes No NA NE
# Is composite sampling flow proportional? 111000
Is sample collected above side streams? , 111 ❑ 0 ❑
Is proper volume collected? •❑ ❑ ❑
Is the tubing clean? U ❑ ❑ ❑
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees II ❑ ❑ ❑
Celsius)?
Is sampling performed according to the permit? •❑ ❑ ❑
Comment:
Effluent Sampling.
Is composite sampling flow proportional?
Is sample collected below all treatment units?
Is proper volume collected?
Is the tubing clean?
# Is proper temperature set for sample storage (kept at less than or equal to 6.0 degrees
Celsius)?
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type
representative)?
Comment:
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑-❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
▪ ❑ ❑ ❑
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Page# 7

Permit: NC00501 05 Owner - Facility: Rockfish Creek VWVTP
Inspection Date: 02/12/2020 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Upstream / Downstream Sampling
Is the facility sampling performed as required by the permit (frequency, sampling type, and
sampling location)?
Yes No NA NE
• ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: The upstream and downstream sampling is performed by the Middle Cape Fear River Basin
Association.
Effluent Pipe
Is right of way to the outfall properly maintained?
Are the receiving water free of foam other than trace amounts and other debris?
If effluent (diffuser pipes are required) are they operating properly?
Comment:
Yes No NA NE
MI ❑ ❑ ❑
▪ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑ ❑ • ❑
Page# 8

Regional Inspectors' Checklist for Field Parameters •
[This checklist is to be completed during regional plant inspections for Field Laboratories, denoted by certification numbers in the 5000s.]
Facility Name: go( k t; fk °0 &J� /1'
Regional Plant Inspector: V-(, L) Lt4z
NPDES #: /VL ('oS`cieS
Regional Inspector Contact #:
9((C = it33- )3 ,;Lci
Field Lab Certification #: 5.5 G'
Region: F!2- C>
Lab Contact: Scc-tf" ,M cCw
Date: ? - I .. - •3-0
I. Check the parameter(s) performed at thissite for reporting purposes.
C�otal Residual Chlorine (TRC) ['Temperature (TEMP) ❑ Specific Conductivity (SC)
pH [Dissolved Oxygen (DO) ❑ Settleable Residue (SETT)
II.
General Laboratory (note any exceptions in section XI
Are instruments, meters, probes, photometric cells, etc. maintained in good condition?
.[ Yes
❑ No
Are standards, reagents and-consumables used within manufacturer expiration dates?
[TRC gel standard is exempt.]
E"Yes
❑ No
y T (.■-t j■�� .Tsja.{(. ..p,S�.�:`.-`Y7
any �v= {�I Pfollowi il. -_TA' - ent '�1�� -
(y��tv',' '
�i
��
it' ''x:i.
. Y} 4.�1J�.....
'SYJl
'S , ''' ''
Nf`CF 'i' 1'e i' j-
'�t Y+ �}%rR�'
'i -�
". . .. . . �C.
.1 K1' S � Yz`I. 2'�v.Y`1`:)
, -.„
zzgk. s�A
-%
f 7,
.�.a'�£.
�kt� 4.d+?.
V .,{y.3 , �+�.
�n b£ 9�Sri43- '1„, t�, "W.L�.'I-_ Tfa9w. C 'h•s ry�'.v' �-T ,f¢
��e��'t ,5 -�,�+� ��?;i� ra'wtgl - �� �' ,_,.. ;t,�z. �"a t�.�
'4iFY5
_����:.t.''��1_��7''
v'r
j,> ';!,,.W.
_�h
✓�T
}Y i�a`r
_S r'5.�x�}�'c*_..._..,z��.�+._`ri:.'+
rf
i�t
7 Q �k.Ya
T[[Y:�.
a��}E,-.Y-
Date of sample collection*
Time of sample collection*
I,/
i-'
ii"
Sample collector's initials or signature
V"
..,.--
Date of sample analysis*
✓
V
Time of sample analysis*
v'
,/
v'-
1,-
Analyst initials or signature
/
✓
✓
,%
Sample site (i.e., facility name, location, ID, etc.)
r/
:,/
i
✓-
Instrument ID
✓ .
V
V
N/A
Pararrieter
V
V/
..r
Data qualifiers, when required
*Date and time of sample collection and analysis may be the same for in situ or on -site measurements.
Y � 4 �;•'. qt. t.�:.. �r .�f" OJ'4 Lld.4.)Y r Z�m�;i'%' 9:.Y3,.... •v+1 4Ytty+ �[ S� ��dxtr
ill ,it - i 0 � IQ re re"' '' -1 ads � � ` k 0;173' f A
.a e,cf+•z°ks.r..».» sue, �,- � .�A:....w...-....> ..v..t.a.R,..,.
� ��Li O,��S
,,. ' 2R v._
Total_Residual Chlorine meter make and model: f-j e(.1 1) 39 Do
Is a check standard analyzed each day of use? (Circle one4Ror' liquid standard)
j]`Yes ❑ No
What is the assigned/observed value of the daily check standard? 1 riO .
Is a 5-point calibration verification performed? Note date of last verification: Z - 3o,: / ci
[ 'Yes ❑ No
Alternatively, does the lab construct a linear regression, using 5 standards, to calculate
results? Note date of last calibration curve.constructed:
O'Yes ❑ No
True values: [rpg/L ❑ mg/L R S .. 35 50. 9•0o '/DO.
Obtained values: �g/L ❑ mg/L : 3- / 0 . = SS OS `-/ D 23
What program are samples analyzed on? g
Are results reported in proper units? Check one: [4Ng/L ❑ mg/L
['files ❑ No
Are results reported between the facility's permit limit and the compliance limit of 50 pg/L?
If value is less than the low standard, report as "<x", where x=low standard conc.
FR1es ❑ No
Are samples analyzed within 15 minutes of collection?
Lies ❑ No
.. } P r{' p <F' , U L ,.�y, P'E' ,..:,: t II i',, 0 ? .: ''' �. 2'V=, a-S�l� .fir i' 1
I `Y` H �e\ cTiS.. �Sa>+*w1 �_ .4� .ry ^ 51. kia { �'"` .a. 7
'i 3. �6!!?n"Ghwt ,L'•F: ,., 3.:L-:. R� i..., Y. ��+;}h}.e Vic. q .A ?. :�(rll
r' 4..' �•':_ >tj ,,
f_.b' a _. ✓ iYrA ..
i. .: Cx..
,f.�rd�fF^'$[9.r�L
pH meter make and model: 4cru' ne+ ii- P IS O
Is the pH meter calibrated with at least 2 buffers per mfg's instructions each day of use?
Note buffers used: '-f cl- j i 2
L ?es ❑ No
-
Is the pH meter calibration checked with an additional buffer each day of use?
Note check buffer used: "7
['Yes ❑ No
Does the check buffer read within ±0.1 S.U. of the known value?
[ 1 Yes ❑ No
Are the following items documented:
Meter calibration?
[]'Yes ❑ No
Check buffer reading(s)?
E 'S'es ❑ No
Are samples analyzed within 15 minutes of collection?
F 'Yes ❑ No
Are sample results reported to 0.1 pH units?
[—ales ❑ No

( ppyy TLpy} x per+ /� M�,.k-.
/nplyy � V .ref��'er itOni:01; yY� .l'rai '�S y k4Y. ^ .'f2 LC* . }.-F- .2S :., �'
Ali
- x 2
. „t` {T ..if u•....' 'T..'.
What instrument(s) is used to measure temperature? Check all that apply: ❑ pH meter
IX DO meter ❑ Conductivity meter ❑ Digital thermometer ❑ Glass thermometer
Is the instrument/thermometer calibration checked at least annually against a NIST
traceable or NIST certified thermometer? (a - as, _ i ei '
Wes ❑ No
Are temperature corrections (even if zero) posted on the instrument/thermometer?
[lies ❑
No
Are samples measured in situ or on -site? [REQUIRED - there is no holding time for
temperature]
©'Yes ❑ No
Are sample results reported in degrees C?
[Tes ❑ No
F_ ■S'+ii , Ujt�f/Sv .A' $=^T��nA ��i /� �y(��(3 Y� ���"W,2y,`��.�`�" '"taa '+L'�` 't �C{1 .. .'ri..y �." 3F `ed ? ; `ham }. F 1
Al.:.,- .litti YY Niet , r Y �'.5��. 1(51- �"CTp .:�,.. 3 rAtfi" S=✓. shy f i. .� Im Pi k i' v _ i•
-Y.- e 44.w 73,-.-,.`.-'.,.a... � ..f-J,-. _ 1_. .. ..:.0 ? ,.:r.: .Sw �. <z .-'-..R.vxs-..�
Y4%i a`Y ,.1 .? li :Sh\'_ i
..-, +?.�
DO meter make and model: YS re '
Is the air calibration of the DO meter performed each day of use? . :
[ages ❑ No
Are the following items documented:
Meter calibration? -
[es ❑ No
Are samples analyzed within 15 minutes of collection?
2:-Yes ❑ No
Are results reported in mg/L?
Mies ❑ No
Y �Fy''m� d y4�S' `]�■�`�■�,, - s 'Y`4^^. 'nQ /J1'} ,{■:.����. +F' F"
'Ff.,y-,ST1. J,£.;£(".aY�1.Y..li�i:X�Tr!:1+2.5...'`�s3�.wv��r �{�{nS�•tY
cSA.'r*,c}2'*,--
'.{f}�1 4,
Conductivity meter make and model:
Is the meter calibrated daily according to the manufacturer's instructions? Note standard
used (this is generally a one -point calibration):
Yes ❑ No
Is a daily check standard analyzed? Note value:
❑ Yes ❑ No
Are the following items documented:
Meter calibration?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Are samples analyzed within 28 days of collection?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Are results reported in pmhos/cm csome meters display equivalent pS/cm units)?
❑ Yes ❑ No
y$p {{+�.` '�. .'i-,E"' =r ,sf(�'�{'.. sF3 Ya-r.; �a?a 5 a?p�s yam, ...,,aye,-�;,}` nky.;f;s.. ari'�,s-,�.'�+3-;�y�ti .�'.'.<� .. �'"k+:lk
rF+uKJ� �.Rf' .b .7 11� fattOr. :`1 }il ete if .. , 1? n�a 3,`fw'»1 ,aF.` su.."fi.
.'ia --.�.T.: ._�"� A:.. 5. :.y .Sk 3�. .:%..i1 �1.`'�i'..a'siYSi�1t,-'1'4,r,
ia„'4'�":,=M'°�,7/^,y,=
Irtl� -,:.
Does the laboratory have an Imhoff Cone in good condition?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Is the sample settled for 1 hour?
❑ Yes
❑
No
Is the sample agitated after 45 minutes?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Are the following items documented:
Volume of sample analyzed? Note volume analyzed:
❑ Yes ❑ No
Date and time of sample analysis (settling start time)?
❑ Yes
No
Time of agitation after 45 minutes of settling?
❑ Yes
❑
No
Sample analysis completion (settling end time)?
❑ Yes
❑
No
Are samples analyzed within 48 hours of collection?:
❑ Yes
❑
No
Are results reported in ml/L?
❑ Yes
❑
No
2�Z.:�C .sFLu b A,. e.G"..r �Y}9�.. `�Y� ..af�(�T tt� y \. 4• 'P,i`/{��5R.� i-` i ^`
c'e` it �� T• iFE o F:N Rai /� i t � iv* e � �i' "ifs
" i ` '�-^3..:^yw'�`vt, k." �ar5.'sx�3 �z�wk
��°''�(�4.�{ '!�.
J` ysy
A. 0 4
"^_'ih
$t%$�
1a�3
-...
x., .3".t
� "7 w'
h v�4aO WTat'1n� 4vSr`i,14ttrt my�gn�i��s ,4
rt"<Y!it%[a,Fi�R�i,•,Ti...^^..�'$`;s;S7'Sr�E�`r..'!�!'*+"': rle!��•t�f6R �irF�°-"v;,�:i.k�
at-, \
i'..
, �.:g -.
XI. Additional comments:
Please submit a copy of this completed form to the Laboratory Certification program at:
DWR Lab Certification, Water Sciences Section, 1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh NC, 27699-1623
Electronic copies may be emailed to linda.chavis(a�ncdenr.gov.
Revision 09/11/2015