SW3191102_Supplement-EZ Form_20200220

SUPPLEMENT-EZ COVER PAGE
F 4MSIfiADFD
PROJECT
INFORMATION
1
1 Project Name
Deer Creak Farts Riding Academy
2
1 PMject Area ac
259
3
Coastal Wetland Area {acj -.-- .v_-.--
Surface Water Area ac
.- .-_.--- ..--...., -.-.._ -- 0-..�--_— .-.-
0.08
4
5
Is this profect High or Low Dan.' ?
Low
6
Does this project use an off site SCM?
No
COMPLIANCE WITH 02H .1003[4
7 Width of _vegetated setbacks provided feet 50
8 Will the v fated setback remain vegetated?_. -_ - Yes__
9 Is BUA other that as listed In .100 4 c-d out of the setback? Yes
10 Is streambank stabilization proposed on this project? I No
20
23
24
26
IER AND TYPE OF SCMs:
Infiltration stem
Biorelention Cell
0
0
Wet Pond
_
0
Stormwater Welland
0
Permeable Pavement
0
Sand Filter
0
Rainwater Harvests RWH
0
Green Roof
0
Level Bader -Filter Sft ILS-FS)0
Disconnected Impervious Surface (DISI
0
Treatment Swale
0
Pq Pond
0
StormFilter
0
Sllva Celt
0
BwAltar
0___
Filterra
0
FORMS LOADED
Certification Statomerd.
I certify, under penalty of law that this Supplement-F2 form and all supporting information were prepared under my directbn or
supervision, that the information provided In the form Is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete; and
that the engineering plans, specifications, operation and maintenance agreements and other supporting Information are consistent
with aha information nrnvidad here
Nk" \A CAR
�ooFssioy.;29
a SEAL
037673 }
;' c
�'��a,�Rr S.
N���````
Date

DRAINAGE AREAS
1
Is this a high density project?
No
2
If so, number of drainage areas/SCMs
1
3
Is all/part of this project subject to previous rule
versions?
No
CLICK TO LOAD FORM
Entire Site
1
4
T pe of SCM
Grassed Swales
5
Total BUA in project (sq ft
33378 sf
6permitting)
New BUA on subdivided lots (subject to
s ft
N/A
7permitting)
New BUA outside of subdivided lots (subject to
s
33378 sf
8
Offsite - total area (sq ft
N/A
9
Offsite BUA (sq ft
N/A
10
Breakdown of new BUA outside subdivided lots:
Parking (sq ft
9312 sf
Sidewalk (sq ft
527 sf
Roof (sq ft
7840 sf
Roadway s ft
10472 sf
Future (sq ft
5227 sf
Other, please specify in the comment box
below (sq ft
N/A
11
New infiltrating permeable pavement on
subdivided lots (sq ft
N/A
12
New infiltrating permeable pavement outside of
subdivided lots (sq ft
N/A
13permitting)
Exisitng BUA that will remain (not subject to
s ft
N/A
14
Existina BUA that is already permitted (sq ft
N/A
15
Existing BUA that will be removed (sq ft
N/A
16
Percent BUA
3 0
17
Design storm inches
N/A
18
Design volume of SCM cu ft
N/A
19
Calculation method for design volume
N/A
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
20
Please use this space to provide any additional information about the
drainage area(s):
DRAINAGE AREA INFORMATION
Entire Site
1
4
T pe of SCM
N/A
5
Total BUA from project (sq ft)
6
1995 rules
S L 2006-246
2008 rules
2017 rules
7
New BUA on subdivided lots (subject to
permitting) (sq ft)
1995 rules
S L 2006-246
2008 rules
2017 rules
New BUA outside of subdivided lots (subject
to permitting) (sf)
1995 rules
S L 2006-246
2008 rules
8
2017 rules
9
Offsite -total area (sq ft)
1995 rules
S L 2006-246
2008 rules
2017 rules
10
Offsite BUA (sq ft)
1995 rules
S L 2006-246
2008 rules
2017 rules
11
IDesign storm (inches)

1995 rules
S L 2006-246
2008 rules
2017 rules
12
Breakdown of new BUA:
Parking (sq ft
Sidewalk (sq ft
Roof (sq ft
Roadway s ft
Future (sq ft
Other, please specify in the comment box
below (sq ft
13
New infiltrating permeable pavement on
subdivided lots (sq ft
14
New infiltrating permeable pavement outside of
subdivided lots (sq ft
15permitting)
Exisitng BUA that will remain (not subject to
s ft
16
Existina BUA that is already permitted (sq ft
17
Existing BUA that will be removed (sq ft
18
Percent BUA
19
Design volume of SCM cu ft
20
Calculation method for design volume
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
21
Please use this space to provide any additional
information about the drainage area(s):

LOW DENSITY
DESIGN
REQUIREMENTS FOR LOW DENSITY PROJECTS FROM 021-1.1003
1
Is project below density thresholds set forth in the applicable stormwater rule?
Yes
2
Does project maximize dispersed flow and minimize channelization of flow?
Yes
3
Has the use of piping been minimized per .1003(2)(c)?
Yes
4
Side slopes of the vegetated conveyances (H:V)
3:1
5
Maximum velocity in the vegetated conveyances during the 10-year storm?
2.67
6
Are curb outlet swales proposed?
No
7
Maximum longitudinal slope of curb outlet swale(s) (%)
8
Bottom width of curb outlet swale(s) (feet)
9
Maximum side slope of curb outlet swale(s) (H:V)
10
Minimum length of curb outlet swale(s) (feet)
11
Are treatment swales used instead of curb outlet swales?
12
Is stormwater released at the edge of the setback as dispersed flow?
Yes
13
Have stormwater outlets been designed to prevent downslope erosion?
Yes
14
JAre variations to rule .1003 proposed?
No
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
15 IlPlease use this space to provide any additional information about this low density project: