20200263 Ver 1_401 Application_20200212

Preliminary ORM Data Entry Fields for New Actions
ACTION ID #: SAW -
Prepare file folder ❑
1. Project Name [PCN Form A2a]: Rolesville CrossFit
Begin Date (Date Received):
Assign Action ID Number in ORM ❑
2. Work Type: ❑Private ❑ Institutional ❑ Government ❑✓ Commercial
3. Project Description / Purpose [PCN Form B3d and B3e]:
The proposed project would include the construction of a multi -use flex building, accompanying parking lot and an additional outdoor
exercise area. The project would help increase and enhance the recreational opportunities for the surrounding area within the rapidly
growing Triangle region of North Carolina. Construction would be accomplished using typical equipment including excavators,
backhoes, and dump trucks. Additional equipment may be used as required.
4. Property Owner / Applicant [PCN Form A3 or A4]: McArn Realty
5. Agent / Consultant [PNC Form A5 — or ORM Consultant ID Number]:
Philip May, Carolina Ecosystems Inc.
6. Related Action ID Number(s) [PCN Form 135b]: N/A
7. Project Location —Coordinates, Street Address, and/or Location Description [PCN Form Blb]:
850 Granite Falls Boulevard, Rolesville, NC 27571
8. Project Location— Tax Parcel ID [PCN Form Bla]: 1759-82-2247
9. Project Location — County [PCN Form A2b]: Wake
10. Project Location — Nearest Municipality or Town [PCN Form A2c]: Rolesville
11. Project Information — Nearest Waterbody [PCN Form 132a]: UT to Sanford Creek
12. Watershed / 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit Code [PCN Form 132c]: 03020201
Authorization: Section 10 ❑ Section 404 ✓❑
Regulatory Action Type:
❑ Standard Permit
✓ Nationwide Permit #
Regional General Permit #
✓ Jurisdictional Determination Request
Section 10 and 404 ❑
❑ Pre -Application Request
❑ Unauthorized Activity
❑ Compliance
❑ No Permit Required
Revised 20150602

0CAROLINA
ECOSYSTEMS
Ms. James Lastinger
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, NC 27587
3040 NC Hwy 42 West; Clayton, NC 27520
P:919-359-1102 — F:919-585-5570
February 12, 2020
RE: Pre -Construction Notification: Nationwide Permit 39 and General Certification No. 4139
Rolesville CrossFit
Rolesville, Wake County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Lastinger;
Carolina Ecosystems, Inc., on behalf of the McArn Realty, LLC and FLM Engineering, has
prepared the attached Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) for the above referenced project for a
Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 404 Nationwide Permit (NWP) 39 and corresponding General
Certification (GC) 4139. The site is located along Granite Falls Boulevard, in Rolesville, Wake
County, NC. The project would help to meet recreational demands for residents in the rapidly
growing Triangle region of North Carolina.
The attached PCN form provides information for your use in review of unavoidable impacts to a
wetland and riparian buffers. Two unnamed tributaries of Sanford Creek in the Neuse River
Basin (HUC: 03020201) occur on the property.
Impacts
The project would require impacts associated with the construction of a recreational facility that
would serve the growing demands of residents. The site is bounded by two perennial, mapped
streams. Therefore, a more centrally placed structure with impervious areas located nearest to the
existing road (Granite Falls Blvd) was designed to largely avoid features on the site.
The proposed construction would result in the loss of 0.01 acre wetland WB. This loss would be
the result of fill associated with the main building, an additional outside exercise area and
grading to maintain existing topography. Fill resulting from grading would affect buffers to both
streams on site (SA to the west and north of the proposed building and SB to the north and east
of the proposed building.) In all, grading would temporarily disturb 5,018 square feet of Zone II
riparian buffers on the site. All temporarily disturbed Zone II buffer areas will be revegetated and
returned to preexisting topography.

Rolesville CrossFit
February 12, 2020
Avoidance and Minimization
Page 2 of 3
As previously mentioned, the location of aquatic features on the property largely dictated the
placement of the proposed structure. By locating the structure in its proposed position, stream
and Zone I riparian buffer impacts would be completely avoided. Additionally, retaining walls
would be placed along the proposed stormwater feature, outdoor exercise area, and parking lots
to limit the extents of fill material. The anticipated impacts are needed to maintain project
viability and avoid more significant potential wetland, stream, and buffer impacts elsewhere on
the property.
Sediment and erosion control measures would be implemented according to NC requirements,
and approved by NCDEQ prior to implementation. Jurisdictional areas adjacent to construction
areas would be clearly marked with protection fencing or other similar method to avoid
inadvertent encroachment. Zone I riparian buffer areas will be completely avoided by personnel
and equipment. Copies of permits and impact areas would be provided to the prime contractor
and all subcontractors working in or near jurisdictional areas. Land clearing would take place
along with installation of erosion control devices. Construction would be accomplished using
typical equipment including excavators, backhoes, and dump trucks. Additional equipment may
be used as required.
A Tier 1 search of the NC Natural Heritage Data Explorer found no records of federally
protected species on or near the project. Their report is attached. The preceding information,
along with the enclosed Pre -Construction Notification form, Vicinity Map, USGS Map, Aquatic
Features Map, NRCS Map, an Impact Exhibit (C-1), a Grading and Storm Drainage Plan (C-6),
and Stormwater Wetland Details (C-7).
If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at your earliest
convenience at [phone] or [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Carolina Ecosystems, Inc.
Philip May
Senior Scientist and Vice President
cc: Mr. Mac Haupt, NCDWR, 401 & Buffer Permitting Unit

Rolesville CrossFit Page 3 of 3
February 12, 2020
Attachments:
- Pre -Construction Notification Form
- Agent Authorization Form
- NC Natural Heritage Program Search Report NCNHDE-6037
- Figure 1: Vicinity Map
- Figure 2: USGS Map
- Figure 3: Features Map
- Figure 4: NRCS Map
- Rolesville CrossFit Impact Exhibit Map (FLM, C-1)
- Rolesville CrossFit Grading and Stormwater Drainage Plan (FLM, Sheet C-6)
- Rolesville CrossFit Stormwater Wetland Details (FLM, sheet C-7)
- Rolesville CrossFit Preliminary Jurisdictional Request Report

0 w"JwY
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no.
DWQ project no.
Form Version 1.4 January 2009
Pre -Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A.
Applicant Information
1.
Processing
1 a.
Type(s) of approval sought from the Corps:
❑X Section 404 Permit ❑ Section 10 Permit
1 b.
Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: NWP 39 or General Permit (GP) number: 4139
1c.
Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps?
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 d.
Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
❑X 401 Water Quality Certification — Regular ❑ Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
❑ 401 Water Quality Certification — Express ❑ Riparian Buffer Authorization
1 e.
Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?
For the record only for DWQ
401 Certification:
❑ Yes ❑X No
For the record only for Corps Permit:
❑ Yes ❑X No
1f.
Is payment into a mitigation bank or in -lieu fee program proposed for
mitigation of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank
or in -lieu fee program.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 g.
Is the project located in any of NC's twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1 h
below.
❑ Yes ❑X No
1 h.
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2.
Project Information
2a.
Name of project:
Granite Falls Crossfit
2b.
County:
Wake
2c.
Nearest municipality / town:
Rolesville
2d.
Subdivision name:
Granite Falls
2e.
NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state project no:
3.
Owner Information
3a.
Name(s) on Recorded Deed:
McArn Realty
3b.
Deed Book and Page No.
017304; 00769
3c.
Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable):
3d.
Street address:
403 N Cheatham St
3e.
City, state, zip:
Tavares, FL 32778
3f.
Telephone no.:
none provided
3g.
Fax no.:
3h.
Email address:
none provided
Page 1 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4.
Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a.
Applicant is:
❑ Agent ❑ Other, specify:
4b.
Name:
4c.
Business name
(if applicable):
4d.
Street address:
4e.
City, state, zip:
4f.
Telephone no.:
4g.
Fax no.:
4h.
Email address:
5.
Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a.
Name:
Philip May
5b.
Business name
(if applicable):
Carolina Ecosystem, Inc.
5c.
Street address:
3040 NC Hwy 42 West
5d.
City, state, zip:
Clayton, NC 27520
5e.
Telephone no.:
919-606-1065
5f.
Fax no.:
5g.
Email address:
[e-mail]
Page 2 of 10

B.
Project Information and Prior Project History
1.
Property Identification
1a.
Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID):
1759822247
1 b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees):
Latitude: 35.925694 Longitude:-78.465501
1 c.
Property size:
1.78 acres
2.
Surface Waters
2a.
Name of nearest body of water to proposed project:
LIT to Sanford Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water:
C; NSW
2c.
River basin:
Neuse
3.
Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The site is forested throughout. The vicinity is mostly residential and commercial properties with additional forested areas and agricultural
development relatively nearby.
3b.
List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property: 0.07
3c.
List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property: 591
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of this development is to provide recreational opportunities for the expanding population of the triangle area.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
See cover letter.
4.
Jurisdictional Determinations
4a.
Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the
Corps or State been requested or obtained for this property /
roject includin all rior hases in the ast?
0 Yes ❑ No ❑ Unknown
Comments: JD submitted concurrently with this PCN
4b.
If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type
of determination was made?
❑ Preliminary ❑ Final
4c.
If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Matt Harrell, Preston Butler
Agency/Consultant Company: Carolina Ecosystems, Inc.
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Corps PJD request is being submitted concurrently with this PCN.
5.
Project History
5a.
Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for
this project (including all prior phases) in the past?
❑Yes 0 No ❑ Unknown
5b.
If yes, explain in detail according to "help file" instructions.
6.
Future Project Plans
6a.
Is this a phased project?
❑ Yes 0 No
6b.
If yes, explain.
Page 3 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1 a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
❑X Wetlands ❑ Streams — tributaries ❑X Buffers ❑ Open Waters ❑ Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
2b.
Type of impact
2c.
Type of wetland
2d.
Forested
2e.
Type of jurisdiction
Corps (404,10) or
DWQ (401, other)
2f.
Area of
impact
(acres)
W1 P
Fill
Headwater Wetland
Yes
Corps
0.01
W2
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W3 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W4 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W5 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
W6 -
Choose one
Choose one
Yes/No
2g. Total Wetland Impacts:
0.01
2h. Comments:
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary (T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial (PER) or
intermittent (INT)?
3e.
Type of
jurisdiction
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
S1 -
Choose one
-
S2 -
Choose one
-
S3 -
Choose one
-
S4 -
Choose one
-
S5 -
Choose one
-
S6 -
Choose one
-
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts
3i. Comments:
Page 4 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then indivi ually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.
Type of impact
4d.
Waterbody
type
4e.
Area of impact (acres)
01 -
Choose one
Choose
O2 -
Choose one
Choose
03 -
Choose one
Choose
04 -
Choose one
Choose
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, the complete the chart below.
5a.
Pond ID number
5b.
Proposed use or
purpose of pond
5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
Flooded
Filled
Excavated
P1
Choose one
P2
Choose one
5f. Total:
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:
6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a. Project is in which protected basin?
❑X Neuse ❑ Tar -Pamlico ❑ Catawba ❑ Randleman ❑ Other:
6b.
Buffer Impact
number —
Permanent (P) or
Temporary T
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Stream name
6e.
Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.
Zone 1
impact
(square
feet)
6g.
Zone 2
impact
(square
feet
B1 T
Grading/Fill
UT to Sanford Creek (SA)
No
0
5018
B2 -
No
B3 -
No
B4 -
No
B5 -
No
B6 -
No
6h. Total Buffer Impacts:
0
5018
6i. Comments:
Page 5 of 10

D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Given the locations of the features on site, the proposed construction area would be the only possible location within the parcel to complete the
project without impacting the nearby streams, Zone 1 riparian buffers, and larger wetlands on the property.
1 b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Best management practices and sedimentation and erosion control methods would be used during all construction techniques. No equipment
refueling or maintenance activities would occur adjacent to jurisdictional areas. Limits of disturbance would remain outside of Zone 1 riparian buffers.
Zone 2 riparian buffers impacted during construction will be revegetated following completion.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
❑ Yes ❑X No
2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply):
❑ DWQ ❑ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this
project?
❑ Mitigation bank
El Payment to in -lieu fee program
❑ Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter)
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Type: Choose one
Quantity:
Quantity:
Quantity:
3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In -lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in -lieu fee program is attached.
❑ Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested:
linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature:
Choose one
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only):
square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4f. Non -riparian wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested:
acres
4h. Comments:
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.
Page 6 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) — required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
Yes ❑X No
buffer mitigation?
6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
6c.
6d.
6e.
Zone
Reason for impact
Total impact
Multiplier
Required mitigation
(square feet)
(square feet)
Zone 1
3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2
1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in -lieu fee fund).
6h. Comments:
Page 7 of 10

E.
Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1.
Diffuse Flow Plan
1a.
Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
❑X Yes ❑ No
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules?
1 b.
If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Possible
BMP performance exemption. Stormwater features on the property would be designed to
❑ Yes ❑X No
remove at least 30% of total Nitrogen.
2.
Stormwater Management Plan
2a.
What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project?
29 8 ova
2b.
Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan?
❑X Yes ❑ No
2c.
If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why:
2d.
If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
The site's stormwater runoff will be collected and conveyed to a stormwater wetland, which will provide water quantity and quality treatment.
2e.
Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
3.
Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a.
In which localgovernment's jurisdiction is thisproject?
wake County
❑X Phase II
❑X NSW
3b.
Which of the following locally -implemented stormwater management programs
❑ USMP
apply (check all that apply):
❑ Water Supply Watershed
❑ Other:
3c.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
El Yes ❑X No
attached?
4.
DWQ Stormwater Program Review
El Coastal counties
❑ HQW
4a.
Which of the following state -implemented stormwater management programs apply
❑ORW
(check all that apply):
❑X Session Law 2006-246
❑ Other:
4b.
Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
❑ Yes ❑X No
attached?
5.
DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a.
Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements?
❑ Yes ❑ No
5b.
Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met?
❑ Yes ❑ No
Page 8 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

F.
Supplementary Information
1.
Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1 a.
Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
❑ Yes
❑X No
use of public (federal/state) land?
1 b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
❑ Yes
❑ No
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
1c.
If you answered "yes" to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
❑ Yes
❑ No
letter.)
Comments:
2.
Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a.
Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
El Yes
❑X No
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
2b.
Is this an after -the -fact permit application?
❑Yes
❑X No
2c.
If you answered "yes" to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3.
Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a.
Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
❑Yes
❑X No
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality?
3b.
If you answered "yes" to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered "no," provide a short narrative description.
4.
Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a.
Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non -discharge or discharge) of wastewater
generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
The planned building would be connected to City of Raleigh water and sewer. The receiving facility would be the Swift Creek Wastewater Treatment
plant which has a capacity of 3 million gallons per day (GPD).
Page 9 of 10
PCN Form — Version 1.4 January 2009

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
❑ Yes ❑X No
habitat?
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
❑x Yes ❑ No
impacts?
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted.
Raleigh
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
USFWS Information for Planning and Conservation online mapper. Accessed 12/13/19. NCNHP Data Explorer online mapper. Accessed 12/13/19.
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat?
❑ Yes ❑X No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
http://www.habitat.noaa.gov/protection/efh/habitatmapper.htm1
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
❑ Yes ❑X No
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
HPOWEB Map Service http://gis.ncdcr.gov/hpoweb/. National Register of Historic Places http://www.nps.gov/nr/research/.
There are no historic Dronerties listed on the site.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain?
❑ Yes ❑X No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements:
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination?
Wake County FEMA GIS floodplain mapping, North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program http://www.ncfloodmaps.com/
Applicant/Agent's Printed Name
Date
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization
letter from the applicant isprovided.)
Page 10 of 10

E�, C LI A
� E G S STE M S
3040 NC Hwy 42 West; Clayton, NC 27520
P:919-359-1102 — F:919-585-5570
PROPERTY ACCESS AND AGENT AUTHORIZATION FORM
Proyeal Information
Property Address
an Description 850 Granite Falls Boulevard Rolesville, NC 27571
Parcel Identification
Number(s) (PIN) 1759-82-2247
City: Rolesville State: NC County: Wake Property Size (Acres): 1.77
Property Owner Information
Owner: ® Authorized Agent*: ❑
Name: McArn Really LLC
Title: NIA
Street Address: 403 N Cheatharn St
City: Franklinton State: NC Zip Code: 2755-1104
*Written proof of authorization from owner required.
Authorization
I, the undersigned, a duly authorized owner of record of the property/properties identified herein, do authorize
representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein
described for the purpose of conducting on -site investigations and issuing a determination associated with Waters of the
U.S. subject to Federal jurisdiction under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors
Act of 1899.
Additionally, I hereby grant Carolina Ecosystems, Inc. (CEI) staff, their designated contractors and representatives, as
well as other Federal, State or local authorities access to the above referenced property when necessary for the purposes of
conducting on -site environmental consulting services. I also grant CEI the authority to act as authorized agent on behalf of
the owner of the above listed property for the communication, submission, and/or application to relevant government
entities, including local, state, and federal authorities, for the review, acceptance, concurrence, and/or approval of
environmental information, documents, and/or permit requests concerning the above listed property. These services may
include regulatory determinations of environmental features on my property such as issuing a determination associated
with streams and wetlands. I certify that I am the legal owner or authorized agent of the legal owner of the above property
and have authority to grant such access. I have made CEI aware of, and supplied all available records related to, previous
environmental investigations on the subject property of which I have knowledge.
Owner/Agent (signature) 64%M4 — Date 6 a$ 1 9

011111111 Roy Cooper, Governor
•• n NC DEPARTMENT OF
■�L M■ NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES Susi Hamilton. Secretary
M N'-M Walter Clark, Director, Land and Water Stewardship
N CN H DE-10943
December 13. 2019
Brian Smith
Carolina Ecosystems
3040 NC 42 W
Clayton, NC 27520
RE: Granite Falls Flex Building
Dear Brian Smith:
The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) appreciates the opportunity to provide
information about natural heritage resources for the project referenced above.
Based on the project area mapped with your request, a query of the NCNHP database indicates that
there are no records for rare species, important natural communities, natural areas, and/or
conservation/managed areas within the proposed project boundary. Please note that although there
may be no documentation of natural heritage elements within the project boundary, it does not
imply or confirm their absence; the area may not have been surveyed. The results of this query
should not be substituted for field surveys where suitable habitat exists. In the event that rare
species are found within the project area, please contact the NCNHP so that we may update our
records.
The attached 'Potential Occurrences' table summarizes rare species and natural communities that
have been documented within a one -mile radius of the property boundary. The proximity of these
records suggests that these natural heritage elements may potentially be present in the project area
if suitable habitat exists. Tables of natural areas and conservation/managed areas within a one -mile
radius of the project area, if any, are also included in this report.
If a Federally -listed species is found within the project area or is indicated within a one -mile radius of
the project area, the NCNHP recommends contacting the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) for
guidance. Contact information for USFWS offices in North Carolina is found here:
https://www.fws.aov/offices/Directory/ListOffices.cfm?statecode=37.
Please note that natural heritage element data are maintained for the purposes of conservation
planning, project review, and scientific research, and are not intended for use as the primary criteria
for regulatory decisions. Information provided by the NCNHP database may not be published
without prior written notification to the NCNHP, and the NCNHP must be credited as an information
source in these publications. Maps of NCNHP data may not be redistributed without permission.
The INC Natural Heritage Program may follow this letter with additional correspondence if a
Dedicated Nature Preserve, Registered Heritage Area, Clean Water Management Trust Fund
easement, or Federally -listed species are documented near the project area.
If you have questions regarding the information provided in this letter or need additional assistance,
please contact Rodney A. Butler at rod ney.butlerCo)ncdcr.aov or 919-707-8603.
Sincerely,
NC Natural Heritage Program
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES
® 121 W. JONES STREET, RALEIGH. NC 27603 • 1651 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH. NC 27699
OFC 919.707.9120 • FAX 919.707,9121

Natural Heritage Element Occurrences, Natural Areas, and Managed Areas Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Granite Falls Flex Building
December 13, 2019
NCNHDE-10943
Element Occurrences Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Taxonomic EO ID Scientific Name Common Name Element Accuracy Federal State Global State
oup A Observation Occurrence Status — Status Rank Rank
Date Rank L.
Dragonfly or 32043 Coryphaeschna ingens Regal Darner 2004-Pre H? S-Very --- Significantly G5 S2?
Damselfly Low Rare
No Natural Areas are Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Areas Documented Within a One -mile Radius of the Project Area
Managed Area Na
Town of Rolesville Open Space Town of Rolesville Local Government
Town of Rolesville Open Space - Main Street Park Town of Rolesville Local Government
Town of Rolesville Open Space - Community & Town of Rolesville Local Government
Ballfield Park
Definitions and an explanation of status designations and codes can be found at httos://ncnhde.natureserve.org/content/help. Data query generated on December 13, 2019; source: NCNHP, Q4 Oct 2019.
Please resubmit your information request if more than one year elapses before project initiation as new information is continually added to the NCNHP database.
Page 2 of 3

NCNHDE-10943: Granite Falls Flex Building
N°
n/epe Vrew W
2
yawn wv g' sae � +'3 E
-
`hb yy%Tip
P
9 Dan
�4°s canrF Ug WIIOW Wav O°rvets arF
a "or m w �` c.ann° saa°la ur _
Ccnraw Rd SQP°� Earls Bnd � _ `
0
Pa' a
aRoleSVI��B
l "b
.5y -;Grant Hocu Wa' ny. Rai �'
aT?X $
n'
N 3 H
saO
e
S' Mbnle Glourb Ara _ -
December 13, 2019
Project Boundary
Buffered Project Boundary
Q Managed Area (MAREA)
Page 3 of 3
1:20,764
0 0.175 0.35 0.7 mi
0 0275 0.55 1.1 km
Sources: Eari, HERE, Garmn, Inlemlap, inuement P Cory.. GEBCO, USGS.
FAO, NPS, NRCM. GepBase, IGN, Kadasler NL. ONnance S—y, Esri Japan.
METI, Eui Cbire (Hang Kong), (c) OpenSheetMep contribubrs, and the GIB
User Community

98
96
tith Creek
Ae
'� Creek
0
Granite Falls Bl d
ar Fork
401
?oms Creek
35.925694,-78.465501
0
4
Project Location: i
Wake County, NC r�ti
N Rolesville CrossFit
�I CAROLINA Study Area Wake County, NC
ECOSYSTEMS Miles
0 0.25 0.5 USGS Named Stream
December 2019 Figure 1: Vicinity Map

VJ'J
N Study Area Map Date: December 2019 Rolesville CrossFit
Q
[)1CAROLINA Feet Revised: Wake County, NC
VECOSYSTEMS 0 50 100 wetland
Revised: Figure 2:
I\.i Perennial Stream USGS Ma
Rolesville 2016 USGS 1:24000 Quadrangle MapRevised: P

} a } At r —
e 4
T t
' •� mot.. f ,L '•. e -
IL
Fl-
'W X ` a ' 1 � � • 14
I!( 1
N Study Area Map Date: December 2019 Rolesville CrossFit
Q
H,CAROLINA Feet Wetld Revised: Wake County, NC
.
ECOSYSTEMS 0 50 100 anRevised: Figure 3•
Perennial Stream Aquatic Features Ma
2017 NC Statewide Aerial Photographs Revised: �l P

WkE
-L -
r A- - -
LO�•i
Subject Throughout
a
Subject Throughout ti y
A C2 W-f
Lo
OC - -
Yr,
• N Map Date: December 2019 Rolesville CrossFit
rl'1CAROLINA Feet Revised: Wake County, NC
V ECOSYSTEMS 0 100 200 Study Area Revised:
Figure 4:
Wake County,NC NRCS Soil Survey Map 22 Revised: NRCS Map

IMPACT TABLE
TEMPORARY (SQ. FT.) PERMANENT (SQ. FT.) LINEAR FEET
\ STREAM ZONE II BUFFER 5,018
\ IMPACTS ZONE IBUFFER
ENGINEERING
STREAM CHANNEL
\ OWNER: GRANITE FALLS SWIM &
ATHLETIC CLUB LLC WETLAND IMPACTS 653
\ PIN: 1759-82-4864 POST OFFICE BOX 91727
ZONING: CO-SUD RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27675
\ PHONE: 919.61
USE: SWIM & ATHLETIC CLUB
FIRM NC LICENSE NUMBER
C-4222
PROP. 653 SF PERMANENT
WETLAND IMPACTS
OWNER: HHHUNT GRANITE
FALLS LLC I
PIN: 1759-72-9251
ZONING: R2-SUD /^ '
USE: OPEN SP,4CE -- — — _ � � � � _ I I /
EX STREAM TOP OF BANK
/EX. WETLAND I PROP. RETAINING - ,�h ——— ----------- —
WALL (BY OTHERS)
/ EX WETLAND — /
/ /
I
PROP. 5,018 SF TEMPORARY / I �— \ �3so- / EX. LIGHT POLE (Tip.)
ZONE II IMPACTS / I O LD ` PROP. SIDEWALK 50' NEUSE RIPARIAN
(TYP. STREAM BUFFER
LID LD zo/vIc-
1-u
20/1
E2
r — 370
_ \ \ PROP. 24 CURB /
/ / \ // Q _ \ ", & GUTTER (TYP.) / /
co- / EX. 5' SI jEWALK
/ \ _ ( _ _ s ,/ ,/
\ I J — 375 coEX. TELEPHONE
\ rn
PROP. 1,500 SF CONCRETE J _ M / BOXES
\ OUTDOOR FITNESS AREA
PROP.
\ STORMWATER /
/ \ \ CONTROL PROP. 7,394 SF EX. 41' 8-8
MEASURE
PROP. RETAINING
WALL (BY OTHERS) /
\ PROP. VARIABLE o
WIDTH SCM ACCESS 9
\ \ \ J & MAINTENANCE
ESMT.
I\ I I I
LL�--
- — — -375- — — —
f— 380
. W in W W W ' W W W_
;S ss S SS SS SS SS
GRANITE FALLS BLVD (60' PUBLIC R/W)
CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE
YOU DIG
BLDG. /
FFE = 380.00'
01
\ )
\ 0 3 31g
\ w /
\ c
\ C11111
— — — ,381_.
382 \
383
PROP. TURNDOWN
Q"I W ---SIDEWALK ALONG
W W n W PARKING STALLS (TYP.)
mammon as
MANHOLE (TYP.)
EX CULVERT EX. 8" PVC SANITARY
SEWER LINE (TYP.)
EX. WATER METER
c`
S /
O /
EX. STORM SEWER
LINE (TYP.)
EX. CURB INLET (TYP.)
PROP. RETAINING
WALL (BY OTHERS)
EX. POWER BOX
385
O
APPROX. LOCATION EX.
12" DIP WATER LINE;
DEPTH UNKNOWN
D4�
NOTES
1. TOPOGRAPHIC DATA PROVIDED BY CAWTHORNE, MOSS & PANCIERA, P.C.
2. SURFACE WATERS, WETLANDS AND STREAMS SHOWN DELINEATED BY
CAROLINA ECOSYSTEMS, INC AND LOCATED BY CAWTHORNE, MOSS &
PANCIERA, PC.
3. PROPOSED CONTOURS SHOWN REPRESENT FINISH GRADES.
4. ALL CONSTRUCTION TO BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
APPLICABLE TOWN OF WAKE FOREST STANDARDS. ALL TEMPORARY
EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN PROPER
WORKING CONDITIONS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION.
5. CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE AND STABILIZE ALL TEMPORARILY
IMPACTED FEATURES WITH NATIVE VEGETATION.
LEGEND
EX. PROPERTY LINE
— —
EX. RIGHT-OF-WAY
—
— EX. ADJACENT OWNERS
—
— EX. CHANNEL/STREAM
EX. STREAM BUFFER
W
W
EX. WATER LINE
SS
SS
EX. SANITARY SEWER
SD
SD
EX. STORM SEWER
—325—
EX. MAJOR CONTOUR (6)
EX. MINOR CONTOUR (1')
— — — —
— — —
— —
— — PROP. SETBACK LINE
— — — —
— — —
— —
— — PROP. EASEMENT/BUFFER
PROP. CHAINLINK FENCE
"O PROP. ADA HANDRAIL/GUARDRAIL
W
W
PROP. WATER LINE
SS
SS
— PROP. SANITARY SEWER
PROP. STORM SEWER
®
PROP. CURB INLET (CB)
PROP. YARD INLET
®
PROP. FLARED END SECTION
Q
PROP. JUNCTION BOX
LD
LD
PROP. LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE
325
PROP. MAJOR CONTOUR (6)
324
PROP. MINOR CONTOUR (1')
PROP. TEMPORARY ZONE II BUFFER IMPACT
PROP. PERMANENT WETLAND IMPACT
REVISION HISTORY
REV DESCRIPTION DATE BY
ORIGINAL PLAN SIZE: 24" X 36"
ISSUED
FOR REVIEW
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
20 10 0 20
SCALE: 1 INCH = 20 FEET
N SCALE ADJUSTMENT
THIS BAR IS 1 INCH IN LENGTH
ON ORIGINAL DRAWING
0 1"
I I
IF IT IS NOT 1 INCH ON THIS
SHEET, ADJUST YOUR SCALE
ACCORDINGLY
EXHIBIT
ROLESVILLE CROSSFIT
850 GRANITE FALLS BLVD
ROLESVILLE, NC 27571
MCARN REALTY LLC
DATE:
12-10-2019
SCALE:
AS SHOWN
DESIGNED BY:
FLM
APPROVED BY:
FLM
PROJECT NO.:
19036
IMPACT EXHIBIT
NORTH CAROLINA
ONE -CALL CENTER
1-800-632-4949
© 2019 THIS DRAWING SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED IN WHOLE OR IN
PART WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION OF FLM ENGINEERING, INC.
ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ALL TOWN OF
ROLESVILLE, CITY OF RALEIGH AND WAKE
COUNTY STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS
C�i
SHEET 1 OF 1

OWNER: HHHUNT GRANITE
FALLS LLC
PIN: 1759-72-9251
ZONING: R2-SUD
USE: OPEN SPACE
W (— W
S S
GRANITE FALLS BLVD (60' PUBLIC R/W)
CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE
YOU DIG
MANHOLE (TYP.)
EX. CULVERT EX. 8" PVC SANITARY
SEWER LINE (TYP.)
OWNER: GRANITE FALLS SWIM &
ATHLETIC CLUB LLC
PIN: 1759-82-4864
ZONING: CO-SUD
USE: SWIM & ATHLETIC CLUB
PROP. TURNDOWN
(n W SIDEWALK ALONG
—as
W PARKING STALLS (TYP.)
aSmmftft
aS —
(isI=Y CAAIITAPV CFFI?IA/Q
uvv JVJ. uu
��TC 379.90'
/ BC 379.40' /
TC 380.05'
BC 379.5� `�
EX. WATER METER
c`
EX. STORM SEWER
LINE (TYP.)
EX. CURB INLET (TYP.)
TW 385.00' '
BW 385.00''
PROP. RETAINING
WALL (BY OTHERS)
v'
EX. POWER BOX
385 /
APPROX. LOCATION EX.
12" DIP WATER LINE;
DEPTH UNKNOWN
NOTES
1. PROPOSED CONTOURS REPRESENT FINISH GRADES.
2. PROPOSED ADA STALL AND AISLE SHALL HAVE SLOPES NO STEEPER
THAN 1:48 (2%) IN ALL DIRECTIONS.
3. PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE ROUTES SHALL HAVE RUNNING SLOPES NO
STEEPER THAN 1:20 (5%) AND CROSS SLOPES NO STEEPER THAN 1:48
(2%). PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE RAMP SECTIONS SHALL HAVE RUNNING
SLOPES NO STEEPER THAN 1:12 (8.33%) AND CROSS SLOPES TO STEEPER
THAN 1:48 (2%) WITH LANDINGS EVERY 2.5' OF ELEVATION CHANGE.
4. SLOPES ARE 2H:1V UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
5. RETAINING WALLS SHOWN SHALL BE DESIGNED BY OTHERS.
6. SEE SHEET C-2 FOR PIPE TABLE.
7. ALL HDPE SHALL BE DOUBLE WALL.
8. ALL HDPE PIPE AND ROOF DRAIN CONNECTIONS SHALL MEET NC
PLUMBING CODE CHAPTER 11 STORM DRAINAGE, LATEST EDITION.
9. JUNCTION BOXES JB-6 AND JB-9 SHALL BE ADS NYLOPLAST 24" DRAIN
BASINS, OR APPROVED EQUAL, WITH SOLID COVER AND CONCRETE
POURED IN BOTTOM TO ELIMINATE SUMP.
10. YARD INLETS YI-7 AN DYI-8 SHALL BEADS NYLOPLAST 24" DRAIN BASINS,
/ OR APPROVED EQUAL, WITH 24" DROP -IN GRATE AND CONCRETE POURED
IN BOTTOM TO ELIMINATE SUMP.
/
LEGEND
ENGINEERING
POST OFFICE BOX 91727
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27675
PHONE: [phone]
FIRM NC LICENSE NUMBER C-4222
PROLIIV
pQ' ox
_Z�� c,3�1 ,Uo• W_
1"' 1�1A 01,,E
I REVISION HISTORY I
REV DESCRIPTION DATE BY
1 TOWN OF ROLESVILLE 1/23/2020 FILM
COMMENTS
ORIGINAL PLAN SIZE: 24" X 36"
ISSUED
FOR REVIEW
DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
EX. PROPERTY LINE
20 10 0 20
— —
EX. RIGHT-OF-WAY
SCALE: 1 INCH = 20 FEET
—
— EX. ADJACENT OWNERS
N
SCALE ADJUSTMENT
—
— EX. CHANNEL/STREAM
EX. STREAM BUFFER
THIS BAR IS 1 INCH IN LENGTH
ON ORIGINAL DRAWING
W
W
EX. WATER LINE
0 Ill
SS
SS
EX. SANITARY SEWER
I I
IF IT IS NOT 1 INCH ON THIS
SD
SD
EX. STORM SEWER
SHEET, ADJUST YOUR SCALE
ACCORDINGLY
—325—
EX. MAJOR CONTOUR (6)
EX. MINOR CONTOUR (1')
— — — —
— — — — — —
— PROP. SETBACK LINE
SITE PLANS
— — — —
— — — — — —
— PROP. EASEMENT/BUFFER
PROP. CHAINLINK FENCE
ROLESVILLE CROSSFIT
"O PROP. ADA HANDRAIL/GUARDRAIL
850 GRANITE FALLS BLVD
w
w
PROP. WATER LINE
ROLESVILLE, NC 27571
SS
— PROP. SANITARY SEWER
SS
PROP. STORM SEWER
®
PROP. CURB INLET (CB)
PROP. YARD INLET
®
PROP. FLARED END SECTION
MCARN REALTY LLC
Q
PROP. JUNCTION BOX
LD
PROP. LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE
LD
325
PROP. MAJOR CONTOUR (6)
DATE:
10-25-2019
324
PROP. MINOR CONTOUR (1')
SCALE:
AS SHOWN
X TC
TOP OF CURB ELEVATION
DESIGNED BY:
FLM
X BC
BOTTOM OF CURB ELEVATION
APPROVED BY:
FLM
X TW
TOP OF WALL ELEVATION
PROJECT NO.:
19036
X BW
BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATION
X ELEV
SPOT ELEVATION
GRADING & STORM DRAINAGE
PLAN
NORTH CAROLINA
ONE -CALL CENTER
1-800-632-4949
© 2019 THIS DRAWING SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED IN WHOLE OR IN
PART WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION OF FLM ENGINEERING, INC.
ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ALL TOWN OF
ROLESVILLE, CITY OF RALEIGH AND WAKE
COUNTY STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS
C�6
SHEET 6 OF 18

NOTES
1. THE WETLAND MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 14 DAYS OF CONSTRUCTION.
CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE SEQUENCED SO THAT VEGETATION CAN BE PLANTED
AND THE WETLAND BROUGHT ONLINE WITHIN 14 DAYS. PLANTS MAY NEED TO BE
WATERED DURING THIS TIME IF THE DEVICE IS NOT BROUGHT ONLINE THE SAME
DAY. STABILIZATION MAY BE IN THE FORM OF FINAL VEGETATION PLANTINGS OR
A TEMPORARY MEANS UNTIL THE VEGETATION BECOMES ESTABLISHED. IF
USING A TEMPORARY MEANS, CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A WET
HYDROSEED MIX. CONTRACTOR SHALL SCARIFY THE SOIL TO A HALF -INCH
PRIOR TO HYDROSEEDING.
2. INLET AND OUTLET CHANNELS SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM SCOUR THAT MAY
OCCUR DURING PERIODS OF HIGH FLOW. STANDARD EROSION CONTROL
MEASURES SHOULD BE USED.
3. THE STORMWATER WETLAND SHOULD BE STAKED AT THE ONSET OF THE
PLANTING SEASON. WATER DEPTHS IN THE WETLAND SHOULD BE MEASURED
TO CONFIRM THE ORIGINAL PLANTING ZONES. AT THIS TIME, IT MAY BE
NECESSARY TO MODIFY THE PLANTING PLAN TO REFLECT ALTERED DEPTHS OR
THE AVAILABILITY OF WETLAND PLANT STOCK. CONTRACTOR SHALL
COORDINATE PLANTINGS, PLANTING ZONES AND WATER DEPTHS WITH THE
ENGINEER. SURVEYED PLANTING ZONES SHOULD BE MARKED ON AN "AS -BUILT"
OR RECORD DESIGN PLAN AND LOCATED IN THE FIELD USING STAKES OR
FLAGS.
4. THE WETLAND DRAIN SHOULD BE FULLY OPENED FOR NO MORE THAN 3 DAYS
PRIOR TO THE PLANTING DATE (WHICH SHOULD COINCIDE WITH THE DELIVERY
DATE FOR THE WETLAND PLANT STOCK) TO PRESERVE SOIL MOISTURE AND
WORKABILITY.
5. NURSERY STOCK SHALL BE TRANSPLANTED FROM LOCAL AQUATIC PLANT
NURSERIES. THE OPTIMAL PERIOD FOR TRANSPLANTING EXTENDS FROM EARLY
APRIL TO MID-JUNE SO THAT THE WETLAND PLANTS WILL HAVE A FULL
GROWING SEASON TO BUILD THE ROOT RESERVES NEEDED TO SURVIVE THE
WINTER. HOWEVER, SOME SPECIES MAY BE PLANTED SUCCESSFULLY IN EARLY
FALL. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT NURSERY WELL IN ADVANCE OF
CONSTRUCTION TO ENSURE THAT THEY WILL HAVE THE DESIRED SPECIES
AVAILABLE.
6. POST -NURSERY CARE OF WETLAND PLANTS IS VERY IMPORTANT IN THE
INTERVAL BETWEEN DELIVERY OF THE PLANTS AND THEIR SUBSEQUENT
INSTALLATION BECAUSE THEY ARE PRONE TO DESICCATION. STOCK SHOULD BE
FREQUENTLY WATERED AND SHADED.
7. SHWT TO BE EVALUATED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. IF SHWT IS WITHIN 6" OF
PPE ELEVATION, A CLAY LINER WILL NOT BE REQUIRED. OTHERWISE,
INSTALLATION OF A 6" CLAY LINER WILL BE REQUIRED. CLAY LINER SHALL HAVE
A MINIMUM 15% PASSING THE #200 SIEVE AND A MAX PERMEABILITY OF 1 X 10-5
CM/SEC. ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATIVES INCLUDE A 30 MIL POLY -LINER OR A
BENTONITE LINER.
8. GRADES SHOWN REPRESENT FINISH GRADE ELEVATIONS. TO ACHIEVE FINISH
GRADE ELEVATIONS, INSTALL 4" OF TOPSOIL. SOIL pH, COMPACTION AND OTHER
ATTRIBUTES OF THE FIRST 12-INCH DEPTH OF THE SOIL SHALL BE ANALYZED BY
A SOIL SCIENTIST AND/OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DURING CONSTRUCTION.
AMENDMENTS SHALL BE MADE AS NECESSARY.
9. PROVIDE PLANTS PER TABLE ON THIS SHEET. DAM STRUCTURE AND
PERIMETER FILL SLOPES SHALL BE PLANTED WITH NON -CLUMPING TURN
GRASS. TREES AND WOODY SHRUBS NOT ALLOWED.
10. CATTAILS SHALL NOT BE PLANTED IN WETLAND.
OUTLET STRUCTURE NOTES & SPECIFICATIONS
1. 18" RCP OUTLET SHALL BE CLASS III RCP MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM
C76. THE PIPE JOINTS SHALL BE MORTAR OR FLEXIBLE PLASTIC TYPE JOINT.
2. THE MANHOLE OUTLET RISER SHALL BE 4'X4' I.D. MEETING ASTM C-913. THE
MANHOLE JOINTS SHALL BE ASTM C-443 RUBBER GASKET JOINTS. MANHOLE
JOINTS SHALL BE SECURELY ANCHORED TO PREVENT SEPARATION.
CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DESIGN OF THE MANHOLE SECTION
ANCHORING SYSTEM.
3. WATERTIGHT SEAL SHALL BE PROVIDED AT RISER/BARREL INTERFACE.
PERVIOUS MATERIAL SUCH AS SAND, GRAVEL, OR CRUSHED STONE SHALL NOT
BE USED AS BACKFILL AROUND THE PIPE OR ANTI -SEEP COLLAR. FILL MATERIAL
AROUND THE RISER/BARREL STRUCTURE SHALL BE PLACED IN 4" LAYERS AND
COMPACTED TO THE SAME DENSITY AS THE ADJACENT EMBANKMENT.
4. OUTLET STRUCTURE SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH STEPS 1'-2" ON CENTER. STEPS
SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH NCDOT STD. 840.66.
5. CONCRETE ANTI -FLOATATION BLOCK SHALL BE PRECAST DURING FABRICATION.
IF THE CONCRETE ANTI -FLOATATION BLOCK IS CAST SEPARATE FROM THE
MANHOLE ASSEMBLY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR
ANCHORING THE ANTI -FLOATATION BLOCK TO THE MANHOLE RISER ASSEMBLY.
6. ALL POURED CONCRETE SHALL BE A MINIMUM 3,000 PSI (28 DAY) UNLESS
OTHERWISE NOTED.
7. NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC SHALL BE PLACED AROUND EACH JOINT OF
THE 18" RCP BARREL IN 2' WIDE STRIPS CENTERED ON JOINT. FABRIC SHALL BE
AMOCO STYLE 4553 POLYPROPYLENE NON -WOVEN NEEDLE PUNCHED OR
APPROVED EQUAL (NON -WOVEN FABRIC).
BERM SPECIFICATIONS
1. ALL FILL SOILS FOR BERM SECTION SHALL BE CLEAN, IMPERMEABLE MATERIAL
AND COMPACTED TO AT LEAST 98% STANDARD PROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY
DENSITY, AT OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT. NO BLASTED MATERIALS SHALL BE
USED IN THE EMBANKMENT CONSTRUCTION. SOILS SHALL NOT EXHIBIT
SIGNIFICANT SHRINK/SWELL OR DISPERSIVE CHARACTERISTICS. THE ON -SITE
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER SHALL APPROVE THE SOILS FOR PLACEMENT WITHIN
THE BERM SECTION. THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER SHALL ALSO SPECIFY THE
METHODS TO BE USED FOR PLACEMENT OF FILL.
2. IN ALL FILL AREAS OF THE BERM, A SOILS COMPACTION TEST SHALL BE
CONDUCTED EACH 2,500 SQUARE FEET PER VERTICAL CUT OF FILL.
3. A KEY TRENCH IS TO BE PROVIDED IN ALL FILL AREAS. TRENCH TO EXTEND A
MINIMUM OF FIVE FEET BELOW EXISTING GRADE. SOILS AND COMPACTION FOR
KEY TRENCH SHALL MEET ALL REQUIREMENTS OF #1 ABOVE.
4. FILL PLACEMENT SHALL NOT EXCEED A MAXIMUM OF 8" LIFTS. EACH LIFT SHALL
BE CONTINUOUS FOR THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF EMBANKMENT. BEFORE
PLACEMENT OF FILL FOR THE BERM SECTION, ALL UNSUITABLE MATERIAL SHALL
BE REMOVED AND THE SURFACE PROPERLY PREPARED FOR FILL PLACEMENT.
5. NO TREES OF ANY TYPE MAY BE LOCATED ON THE BERM SECTION.
6. SIDE SLOPES SHALL BE LINED WITH NAG S75, OR APPROVED EQUAL.
7. INSTALL ANTI -SEEP COLLAR AT MIDPOINT OF OUTLET PIPE. CONCRETE SHALL
BE 3,000 PSI (28 DAYS) AND REINFORCED WITH #4 REBAR 12" O.C. EACH WAY.
MINIMUM BEARING CAPACITY BENEATH COLLAR SHALL BE 2,000 PSF.
CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE
YOU DIG
1
I
NORTH CAROLINA
ONE -CALL CENTER
1-800-632-4949
LEGEND
EX. PROPERTY LINE
EX. RIGHT-OF-WAY
EX. ADJACENT OWNERS
EX. CHANNEL/STREAM
EX. STREAM BUFFER
-325- -
EX. MAJOR CONTOUR (5)
EX. MINOR CONTOUR (1')
- - - - - - - - - -
- PROP. SETBACK LINE
- - - - - - - - - -
- PROP. EASEMENT/BUFFER
PROP. STORM SEWER
®
PROP. CURB INLET (CB)
®
PROP. YARD INLET
cc
PROP. FLARED END SECTION
0
PROP. JUNCTION BOX
LD LD
PROP. LIMIT OF DISTURBANCE
PROP. MAJOR CONTOUR (5')
325
324
PROP. MINOR CONTOUR (1')
I II II I II II I II II I II SHALLOW LAND AREA
SHALLOW WATER AREA
DEEP POOL AREA
STORMWATER WETLAND MAINTENANCE NOTES
1. THE LANDSCAPE PROFESSIONAL MANAGING THE WETLAND MUST
UNDERSTAND THE BIOLOGICAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE PLANTS AND
MANAGE WATER LEVELS APPROPRIATELY TO PROVIDE FOR THEIR
NEEDS.
2. ALTHOUGH WETLAND PLANTS REQUIRE WATER FOR GROWTH AND
REPRODUCTION, THEY CAN BE KILLED BY DROWNING IN
EXCESSIVELY DEEP WATER. USUALLY, INITIAL GROWTH IS BEST
WITH TRANSPLANTED PLANTS IN WET, WELL -AERATED SOIL.
OCCASIONAL INUNDATION FOLLOWED BY EXPOSURE TO AIR OF THE
MAJORITY OF THE VEGETATION ENABLES THE PLANTS TO OBTAIN
OXYGEN AND GROW OPTIMALLY. CONVERSELY, FREQUENT SOIL
SATURATION IS IMPORTANT FOR WETLAND PLANT SURVIVAL.
3. DRAMATIC SHIFTS CAN OCCUR AS PLANT SUCCESSION PROCEEDS.
THE PLANT COMMUNITY REFLECTS MANAGEMENT AND CAN
INDICATE PROBLEMS OR THE RESULTS OF IMPROVEMENTS. FOR
EXAMPLE, A REQUIREMENT OF SUBMERGED AQUATIC PLANTS, SUCH
AS PONDWEED (POTAMOGETON SPP.), IS LIGHT PENETRATION INTO
THE WATER COLUMN. THE DISAPPEARANCE OF THESE PLANTS MAY
INDICATE INADEQUATE WATER CLARITY. THE APPEARANCE OF
INVASIVE SPECIES OR DEVELOPMENT OF A MONOCULTURE IS ALSO
A SIGN OF A PROBLEM WITH THE AQUATIC/SOIL/VEGETATIVE
REQUIREMENTS. FOR INSTANCE, MANY INVASIVE SPECIES CAN
QUICKLY SPREAD AND TAKE OVER A WETLAND. IF CATTAILS BECOME
INVASIVE, THEY CAN BE REMOVED BY A LICENSED AQUATIC
PESTICIDE APPLICATOR BY WIPING AQUATIC GLYPHOSATE, A
SYSTEMIC HERBICIDE, ON THE CATTAILS.
4. UNLIKE MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR WET OR DRY
STORMWATER PONDS, SEDIMENT SHOULD ONLY BE SELECTIVELY
REMOVED FROM STORMWATER WETLANDS, PRIMARILY FROM THE
FOREBAY.SEDIMENT REMOVAL DISTURBS STABLE VEGETATION
COVER AND DISRUPTS FLOWPATHS THROUGH THE WETLAND. THE
TOP FEW INCHES OF SEDIMENT SHOULD BE STOCKPILED SO THAT IT
CAN BE REPLACED OVER THE SURFACE OF THE WETLAND AFTER
THE COMPLETION OF SEDIMENT REMOVAL TO RE-ESTABLISH THE
VEGETATIVE COVER USING ITS OWN SEED BANK. ACCUMULATED
SEDIMENT SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM AROUND INLET AND OUTLET
STRUCTURES.
EX. STREAM TOP OF BANK
PROP. 24 LF 15" HDPE
OUTLET PIPE @ 4.17%
PROP. 5' X 5' OUTLET
STRUCTURE
50' NEUSE RIPARIAN
STREAM BUFFER
PROP. 20 LF WEIR AT ELEV. 371.00'
LINED WITH NAG SC250
(OR APPROVED EQUAL)
s
TW 372.00' -
BW 367.00'
O
J
PROP. RIPRAP ENERGY DISSIPATOR /
CLASS A RIP RAP 9" THICK
LENGTH: 5'; WIDTH: 3.75'
Vo
PROP. 8'-WIDE
DOUBLE SWING GATE
)0' \\
)0' \\ \
J B-9
ENGINEERING
POST OFFICE BOX 91727
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27675
PHONE: [phone]
FIRM NC LICENSE NUMBER C-4222
ROLfry ''
5g10 N
OQo
=Z AF• w"
ci
o�ATH
REVISION HISTORY
REV DESCRIPTION DATE BY
1 TOWN OF ROLESVILLE 1/23/2020 FLM
COMMENTS
PROP. 4' BLACK III 13ti6.b ' X zev
r\ VINYL CHAIN LINK / I Mi I MgTp-_--r, FES-5TW 367.00'
BW 367.00'
FENCE ON TOP OF III =_-�
RETAINING WALLI-I
1 367.00' X _
II�IIIIIIIIII��I
PROP. RETAINING
WALL (BY OTHERS) III-1
ORIGINAL PLAN SIZE: 24" X 36"
\ �\ PROP. VARIABLE /� CB-4
\ \ \ \ WIDTH SCM ACCESS /
& MAINTENANCE
_
ESMT. TW 373.00' TW 375.50' � - � �
BW 367.00" BW 367.00'
STORMWATER WETLAND PLAN VIEW
SCALE: 1" = 10'
ISSUED
PROP. 5' X 5PRECAST CONCRETE FOR REVIEW
RISER STRUCTURE DO NOT USE FOR CONSTRUCTION
PROP. RETAINING 4' X 4' GRATE ELEV: 370.50' TOP OF BANK
WALL (BY OTHERS) 1 - 4" DIA. ORIFICE ELEV: 368.25' ELEV: 372.00'
1 - 0.75" 0 ORIFICE ELEV: 367.00'
15" INV OUT: 365.00' 20 10 0 20
.p.� F d8' PROP. EMERGENCY SPILLWAY
ELEV: 371.00' SCALE: 1 INCH = 20 FEET
17 100-YR WSEL ELEV: 370.73' - - - - LINED WITH NAG SC250 (OR APPROVED EQUAL) N SCALE ADJUSTMENT
PROP. 0.75" SCHED 40 PVC W/ THIS BAR IS 1 INCH IN LENGTH
90' TURNDOWN ON ORIGINAL DRAWING
INV 367.00' 4' ANTI -SEEP COLLAR 0 1i'
(INTERIOR)
IF IT IS NOT 1 INCH ON THIS
�7 SHEET, ADJUST YOUR SCALE
PPE ELEV: 367.00' ACCORDINGLY
SITE PLANS
6" TO 9" SHALL I I ° a , ° 24 LF 15" HDPE
I I WATER III � @ 4.17%
2' DEEPJ6�
2'DEEP POOL°°ROLESVILLE CROSSFIT
850 GRANITE FALLS BLVD
177
- �I ROLESVILLE, NC 27571
STORMWATER WETLAND PLANTING TABLE
QUANTITY
BOTANICAL NAME
COMMON NAME
SIZE
SPACING
SHALLOW WATER PLANTINGS (AREA = 600 SQ. FT.; 50 HERBACEOUS PLANTS PER 200 SQ. FT.; 150 TOTAL PLANTS REQ.)
30
ACORUS SUBCORDATUM
SWEETFLAG
4 CU. IN.
2' O.C.
30
HYDROLEA QUADRIVALVIS
WATERPOD
4 CU. IN.
2' O.C.
30
IRIS VIRGINICA
BLUE FLAG IRIS
4 CU. IN.
2' O.C.
30
SAGITTARIA LATIFOLIA
DUCK POTATO
4 CU. IN.
2' O.C.
30
SAURURUS CERNUUS
LIZARD'S TAIL
4 CU. IN.
2' O.C.
SHALLOW LAND PLANTINGS (AREA = 745 SQ. FT.; 50 HERBACEOUS PLANTS PER 200 SQ. FT.; 187 TOTAL PLANTS REQ.)
63
CAREX TENERA
QUILL SEDGE
4 CU. IN.
2' O.C.
63
HIBISCUS COCCINEUS
SCARLET ROSE MALLOW
4 CU. IN.
2' O.C.
63
LOBELIA ELONGATA
LONGLEAF LOBELIA
4 CU. IN.
2' O.C.
DEEP POOL
15
ELEOCHARIS ACICULARIS
NEEDLE SPIKERUSH
BARE ROOT
N/A
15
NUPHAR LUTEA SSP. ADVENA
YELLOW POND -LILY
BARE ROOT
N/A
I III II III -III III II
4' X 4' X 2' INV OUT = 365.00' FES SCM INV = 364.00'
CONCRETE SUMP
6" #57 STONE BEDDING
STORMWATER WETLAND CROSS-SECTION MCARN REALTY LLC
NOT TO SCALE
DATE:
10-25-2019
SCALE:
AS SHOWN
DESIGNED BY:
FLM
APPROVED BY:
FLM
PROJECT NO.:
19036
STORMWATER WETLAND
DETAILS
ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN
ACCORDANCE WITH ALL TOWN OF
ROLESVILLE, CITY OF RALEIGH AND WAKE C�7
COUNTY STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS
SHEET 7 OF 18
© 2019 THIS DRAWING SHALL NOT BE REPRODUCED IN WHOLE OR IN
PART WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION OF FLM ENGINEERING, INC.

E
)ECOSYSTEMS
CAROLINA
January 27, 2020
Mr. James Lastinger
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina 27587
RE: Request for Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
Rolesville CrossFit
Rolesville, Wake County, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Lastinger,
3040 NC 42 West, Clayton NC 27520
P:919-359-1102 — F:919-585-5570
Carolina Ecosystems, Inc. (CEI) has completed a delineation of streams and wetlands for a 1.77-
acre site off Granite Falls Boulevard in Wake County, NC. The attached information, including
required forms, tables, and figures, is submitted for your review and determination of jurisdiction
under the Clean Water Act (CWA).
Project Description & Methodology
As shown in Figure 1, the proposed project is located in Rolesville, NC within the Neuse River
Basin (USGS Hydrologic Unit 03020201) and comprises approximately 1.77 acres.
Delineations were performed on June 14, 2019, in compliance with methodology set forth in the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) Wetland Delineation Manual (USACE 1987) and
subsequent guidance including the Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Regional Supplement.
Surface waters were assessed for jurisdiction under the CWA using field indications of ordinary
high water mark and the NC Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) Stream Identification Form
Version 4.11.
Delineation Results
Figure 2 is presented using the Rolesville, NC USGS 7.5 Minute Quadrangle (2016) Map. Figure
3 presents the results of the delineation, including two streams and three wetlands.
Table 1 presents detailed information on each aquatic resource within the study area, including
latitude/longitude, estimated amount and type of aquatic resource in the review area, and
geographic authority to which the resource may be subject. Based on field data, there are
approximately 591 linear feet of perennial stream, and 0.07 acre of wetland in the study area.

Mr. James Lastinger
January 27, 2020
Rolesville CrossFit Site
Page 2 of 2
We respectfully request your review of this information so that a preliminary jurisdictional
determination under the CWA may be obtained. If you have any questions, need additional
information, or would like to schedule a site visit, please contact me at your earliest convenience
at [phone] or [e-mail].
Sincerely,
Carolina Ecosystems, Inc.
1
Jt �
Philip May
Senior Scientist
Attachments:
- Jurisdictional Determination (JD) Request Form
- Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form
- Wetland Data Forms

Jurisdictional Determination Request
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: 850 Granite Falls Boulevard
City, State:
County:
Rolesville, NC
Wake
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN): 1759822247
B. REQUESTOR INFORMATION
Name: Philip May
Mailing Address: 3040 NC Highway 42 W
Clayton, NC 27520
Telephone Number: [phone]
Electronic Mail Address: [e-mail]
Select one:
❑ I am the current property owner.
❑ I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant'
❑ Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
❑ Other, please explain.
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION'
Name: McArn Realty LLC
Mailing Address: 403 N. Cheatham Street
Telephone Number:
Franklinton, NC 27525
N/A
Electronic Mail Address: N/A
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
Version: May 2017 Page 2

Jurisdictional Determination Request
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION' 4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on -
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
See Attached Agent Authorization Form
Print Name
Capacity: ❑ Owner ❑✓ Authorized Agents
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST: (Check as many as applicable)
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize
impacts to jurisdictional aquatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting
process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
❑ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
❑ A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
❑ I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
❑ I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
❑✓ Other:
For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Version: May 2017 Page 3

Jurisdictional Determination Request
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
❑✓ I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United States"on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional "waters of
the United States". PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
"preliminary" in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
❑ I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional "waters of the United States" or "navigable waters of the United
States" are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other "affected
party" (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
❑ I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
✓❑ Size of Property or Review Area 1 • 77 acres.
❑ The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
Version: May 2017 Page 4

Jurisdictional Determination Request
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
❑✓ Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude:
Longitude
35.925694
-78.465501
❑� A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than I Ix17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
■ North Arrow
■ Graphical Scale
■ Boundary of Review Area
■ Date
■ Location of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
■ Jurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
■ Jurisdictional non -wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non -Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
■ Isolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non -
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non -Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non jurisdictional (i.e.
"Isolated", "No Significant Nexus", or "Upland Feature"). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
Wetland and non -wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non -wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled "Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations" to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards. http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re ug latory-Permit-
Pro,gram/Juri sdiction/
Version: May 2017 Page 5

Jurisdictional Determination Request
✓❑ Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
• PJDs, please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form' and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
• AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form'
❑ Vicinity Map
✓❑ Aerial Photograph
✓❑ USGS Topographic Map
❑✓ Soil Survey Map
❑ Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
❑ Landscape Photos (if taken)
❑ NCWAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
❑ NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
❑ Other Assessment Forms
' www.saw.usace.arM.mil/Portals/59/docs/re ug latory/regdocs/JD/RGL 08-02 App_A_Prelim _JD_Form _fillable.pdf
' Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re ug latory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used in evaluating your request to determine
whether there are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdiction under the regulatory
authorities referenced above.
Routine Uses: This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local
government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal
law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the District's website
and on the Headquarters USAGE website.
Disclosure: Submission of requested information is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the
request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued.
Version: May 2017 Page 6

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Philip May -Carolina Ecosystems, Inc. 3040 NC Hwy 42 W, Clayton, NC 27520
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Wake City: Rolesville
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.925694 Long.:-78.465501
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: UT to Sanford Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
SA
35.925361
-78.465977
288 Linear Feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
SB
35.925938
-78.464734
303 Linear Feet
Non -wetland waters
Section 404
WA
35.925986
-78.465788
<0,01 Acre
wetland waters
Section 404
WB
35.925748
-78.465593
0.02 Acre
Wetland waters
Section 404
WC
35.925899
-78.465081
0.05 Acre
Wetland waters
Section 404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be"waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
❑■ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:Vicinity Map
❑■ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑■ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: Rolesville Quadrangle (2016), 1:24K Quad Map
❑■ Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Wake County, NC Map 22
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
State/local wetland inventory map(s):
FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is: .(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑■ Photographs: ❑■ Aerial (Name & Date): 2017 NC Statewide Aerial Photography
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region L !/
Project/Site: V q^ :A t F City/County: tv +f t Sampling Date:
Applicant/OwnerL t^ state: Sampling PointW
p
Investigator(s): ` "r ( f r 1 Section, Township, Range: _ R 4 it I v • ( (
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): C 9' ( 'k" Slope (%): ri — d
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): P I S 6 Lat: S, �- } 7 ; 7 Long: 0 . LI C 5 -7 3 i b Datum: .✓ a Y3
Soil Map Unit NameA_-j �4 c/ ee ( a /t a ,` b S 4- I S NWI classification: i M
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes V No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? ^/p Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes V No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? IV-* (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (66)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (1310)
Saturation (A3)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (61)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (62)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (63)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
k Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (133)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (69)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Soecies? Status
1. '
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
50% of total cover: _
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:_ 5
1.N-te f -air'. -,
7
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
(S7 ,s
i = Total Cover
50% of total cover: 7. S 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 )
2.M.(COS 14 FAG
5.
7
9.
11.
= Total Cover
50% of total cover: y 4 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1_5n.IgX (-0{K,a4t Q�: S ✓ ��1 L
2.
Sampling Point:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species f-� d
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: \J 0 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
k 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb —All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
4. Hydrophytic
5. _ Vegetation
5 = Total Cover Present? Yes No
50% of total cover: �.S 20% of total cover: I
(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
inches Color moist % Color (moist) % Type' Loc Texture Remarks
o - (Or 3/y 100 — — — — S L
1- W, 10Y & 4/1 CS' ?.S YR _VS IS- 4 p1, L
'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
_
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
31ndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6)
_ Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present? Yes / No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

0�3­*+
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region q Project/Site: ��fCI�( q 115 ��(.aC Cit /Count : k t
y y � Sampling Dater �
Applicant/Owner: t_ p ; t c State: tJ C Sampling Point: t- i & 4
Investigator(s): tAkMA FS+k1c,4- Section, Township, Range: R 0 ii S V . ( (C
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): C_rtA+t (4k �,:`04N Local relief(concave, convex, none): C cu-, wv— Slope
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): J-� G 19 Lat: IS. I ) S 71 ,, Long: — �'� 4 6 �f 6 IfDatum: L )A
Soil Map Unit Name: �/C 1, na Ice C A" a �3 : b L S p . (S NWI classification: Pro
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed?rlb Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes DC No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? PO (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes I\ No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes % No Within a Wetland? Yes YN No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply)
Surface Soil Cracks (136)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3)
ZC Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (B1)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (B2)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (135)
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
_ Shallow Aquitard (133)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (139)
_ Microtopographic Relief (134)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes_ No
Depth (inches): `
Water Table Present? Yes_ No
Depth (inches): +
Saturation Present? Yes No
Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes y No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks: Ir ` �✓
If t)y�( 4 t'&'.-�Gl��+°
l 1
i(/` grits
�1
eV �9C7: 1? a J' x C] K/
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont - Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
Tree Stratum (Plot size:
Absolute Dominant Indicator
% Cover Species? Status
Dominance Test worksheet:
_)
Q G C
744 y
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
5 (A)
3._ � {dllu Mb.o ✓ !%•via a F1v a
FA
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
-7 (B)
4. �� � �'OAKKDIy`% n •��Pi NGrA6
✓ �/ (,fin
5
Percent of Dominant Species
1
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
(A/B)
7.
= Total Cover l d
50% of total cover: 4— 20% of total cover:
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: [!G-- )
1. Iij.,^wg *� ;!tet L 5 H
✓ FA,
2. 6-yang-S AsL6 •j A L 1\
7
_Y0__= Total Cover
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Her trat m (Plot size: =L )
1. , rfA �..r; ✓ n 4
2. PA (C., &14•5
9
ri M V; ^, t, Ly %A rr%,\ � ✓ �� �
7
50% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1. \
50%
Remarks: (Include
ai cover:
on a sef
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
= Total Cover
20% of total cover:
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
OBL species
x 1 =
FACW species
x 2 =
FAC species
x 3 =
FACU species
x 4 =
UPL species
x 5 =
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
_ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
X 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
_ 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree - Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub - Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine - All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont -Version 2.0

VQY' _-
SOIL
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to
Depth Matrix
(inches) Color (moist) %
`L 10 rA y
=� 60
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type:
Depth (inches):
Remarks:
or
Redox Features
Color moist % Type Loc
� Ok15-- C LLAL
3—/6 20 L —1—
Sampling Point:
Texture Remarks
,S L
;duced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Indicators for Problematic Hydric So
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Depleted Matrix (173)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Redox Depressions (178)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Red Parent Material (1721) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes K No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

L✓0 kP
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region / q
Project/Site: V f nn . is 1' a (S City/County: 4 kL Sampling Date: O
Applicant/Owner!1 L M State: � Sampling Point: — G
p
Investigator(s): ` 17 ~ k c ir Section, Township, Range: A O US
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): (� S Qn C Local relief (concave, convex, none): r. O I1 vC k Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): 14 G P Lat: 1 S. 1 r) Long: ? o . 116 5-6 6 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: L 9,: ,# �. r y a AN!, S q n NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? ,ov' # Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes ✓ No
Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? �✓t) (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes Now
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
_ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
_ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Drainage Patterns (610)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (61)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron,(C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
_ Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
_ Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (134)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
_ Iron Deposits (B5)
,r
_ Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
,•°
_ Shallow Aquitard (133)
_ Water -Stained Leaves (69)
_ Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ Aquatic Fauna (1313)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Wetland
Hydrology Present? Yes No
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

�,11 'A p
VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point:
'
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Testworksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 0 )
Ac e c �•+`
% Cover
0
Species? Status
✓C
Number of Dominant Species y
1. !., +�
A C
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 1 (A)
Ac.
3. 44 W t <<�+ k A w
—
F M
Total Number of Dominant S
Species Across All Strata: (B)
4. f,�Hy �V��"�
if
1,
5 J � ^ � t�4 S �, � (g . � : � � �
_�
Q
,.A`H
Percent of Dominant Species Cr^
U `'
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
7
Prevalence Index worksheet:
40 = Total Cover
Total % Cover of:
Multiply by:
50% of total cover:
10 20% of total cover: 6
OBL species
x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:
)
FACW species
x 2 =
1. A l tF r� b r ^titt
10 ,/ fA
FAC species
x 3=
2. f',n f ��'^ �� b q
FACU species
x 4 =
3.
UPL species
x 5 =
4,
Column Totals:
(A) (B)
6. Prevalence Index = B/A =
7. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
8. 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
g % 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
_ 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
Total Cover
o o _ 4 -Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
50% of total cover: % •i 20% of total cover:
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
2.
3 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
5.
6 Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7. height.
8.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9. than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
10. m) tall.
11. Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
(� = Total Cover of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
50% of total cover: S 20% of total cover: OL
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
Woody
ViVine Stratum (PI t size:height.
i T 7 r0tVl-AA 011
I.-Hydrophytic
5. _ Vegetation
5 = Total Cover Present? Yes ✓ No
50% of total cover: 200% of total cover: (
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
_(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tvae Loc Texture Remarks
Q- y IoYfN H ! oo — - — - S L
RM=Reduced
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Type:
Depth (inches):
2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sc
Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Redox Dark Surface (176)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No !
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0