20070156 Ver 4_Year 2 Monitoring Report_20091119

u
Mussel Run Headwater Restoration Project
Site Specific Mitigation for Cutter Creek (Greene County, NC)
Annual Monitoring Report - Year 2
Action IN SAW-2007-02828
DWQ Project# 07-0156
C
Prepared for:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
NC DENR; Division of Water Quality
Washington, NC
Prepared by:
LMG
a E; i Wilmington, NC ? I9 U4
NOV Y a 2009
December 2009 DEW-WyATERW&qy
WE TLWS AND STOROXTER BRANC4

•
TABLE OF CONTENTS
r
1. Introduction ...........................................................................................................1
II. On-Site Construction ............................................................................................1
III. Site Planting ..........................................................................................................2
IV. Monitoring Equipment Installation .........................................................................3
V. Annual Monitoring .................................................................................................3
VI. Conclusion ............................................................................................................5
TABLES
1. Plant List and Corresponding Restoration Zone
2. Summary of Vegetative Monitoring Data - Year 2
3. Summary of Hydrologic Monitoring Data - Year 2
FIGURES
1. Vicinity Map
2. USGS Topographic Map
3. Soils Map
4. Aerial Photograph
5. Restoration Plan
6. Monitoring Plot/Well Location Map
APPENDICES
•
A. Year 1 Monitoring Plot Data
B. 2009 Site Photographs
C. 2009 Hydrographs (Wells 1-3)
•
0
Mussel Run Headwater Restoration Project
Site Specific Mitigation for Cutter Creek (Greene County, NC)
Annual Monitoring Report - Year 2
1. Introduction
Construction of the Mussel Run Headwater Restoration Project, the off-site mitigation project for
the Cutter Creek development, was completed on April 18, 2008. This project was designed to
provide mitigation for buffer and stream impacts associated with the construction of Lake Nina
within the Cutter Creek development. The mitigation project is located off of Ormondsville Road
near the town of Fourway, NC approximately five miles from the impact area (Figures 1-4).
This project was reviewed and approved by regulatory staff and the proper permits were obtained
(Action ID# SAW-2007-02828; DWQ Project# 07-0156). Following initial construction, the site will
be monitored for a period of five years. Success will be based on demonstration of appropriate
survivorship and hydrology consistent with wetlands in this landscape position. Following each
monitoring event, a report documenting these aspects will be submitted to regulatory staff.
II. On-site Construction
The first phase of construction involved the removal of the existing road bed. Material from this
road bed was used to fill in two irrigation ponds, totaling 1.2 acres. Finished grades within these
ponds provide a gradual decrease in elevation from the surrounding fields. The second phase
involved the filling of approximately 1,100 linear feet of drainage ditch and removal of a large road
bed present throughout the site. In areas where ditch filling was not appropriate due to hydrologic
trespass concerns, grading was conducted to reduce the amount of channel incision.
The third phase involved the construction of a new 600' channel to provide drainage from the
eastern pond (Pond 1). Grading in this area was configured to mimic a natural "riffle-pool"
sequence found in Coastal Plain streams. A slope of 0.002 was maintained throughout this
portion. The fourth phase involved the construction of a 150' channel to provide drainage from the
western pond (Pond 2) into the existing ditch adjacent to Mussel Run. Similar slopes were

0
maintained for this section. The final phase involved grading and fill work along the northern
portions of the existing stream/ditch network. Grading this area was configured to direct drainage
from the existing fields into Pond 2 and the restored channels (Figure 5).
III. Site Planting
Prior to planting, the entire project area was disked to enhance microtopography and reduce soil
compaction. Following the disking, a five man crew was dispatched to plant 16,000 seedlings
throughout the project area. Each seedling was planted on 8' centers, with an average density 600
stems per acre. A total of six (6) species were planted in one of three different zones, Neuse
Buffer, Cypress-Gum Pond, and Coastal Plain Headwater wetland (Table 1). These zones will
correspond to a frequency of inundation and elevation relative to the reestablished stream
channels. A wetland seed mix was also applied to minimize erosion during the first growing
season.
Table 1. Plant list and corrasnondina restnratinn mna

Cutter Creek Mitig ation Planting
Species Zone* Number
River Birch Betula ni ra HW/NB 2,000
Green Ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica HW/NB 2,000
Atlantic White Cedar Chamaec aris th oides HW/NB 2,000
Bald Cypress (Taxodium distichum P/NB 3,000
Tulip Poplar Liriodendron tuli ifera NB 4,000
Black um N ssa s lvatica v. biflora P/NB 3000

* Planting Zones Total
Acreage 16,000
Density
NB - Neuse Buffer Restoration
HW - Headwater Wetland Restoration
P - Cypress/Gum Pond 5.8
19.4
1.2 600
600
600
2
0
u
IV. Monitoring Equipment Installation
A total of six (6) 0.10-acre permanent monitoring plots, representing 2% of the project area, were
established (Figure 6). These plots were randomly spaced throughout each of the three main
restoration zones. The success criteria for these areas will be based on survivorship totals which
meet or exceed 320 woody stems per acre at the end of the five year monitoring period. Hydrology
within the site will be monitored using shallow groundwater monitoring wells. A total of three (3)
40-inch wells were installed throughout the project area. Each well records the static water depth
on a daily basis. Well data will then be graphed in addition to rainfall totals from the Kinston airport
• and is presented in Appendix C. In order to meet the appropriate success criteria, these areas
must demonstrate a water table within 12 inches of the soil surface for a mimimum of 12
consecutive days equal to or greater than 5% of the growing season.
V. Annual Monitoring
Year 2 annual monitoring was conducted in September 2009. A total of 374 woody stems were
enumerated throughout the six (6) monitoring plots, corresponding to an average of 623 stems per
acre for the project area (Table 2). Of the planted species, river birch (Betula nigra) seedlings were
the most abundant, totaling 100 individuals throughout the plots. Bald cypress (Taxodium
distichum) was the second most abundant species, with 98 individuals observed (Appendix A).
Overall, vigorous growth was observed throughout the site despite below normal precipitation
levels during the early growing season (see Appendix B for site photographs).
Hydrologic monitoring was initiated in May 2008 with the installation of three (3) WM-40
•
groundwater monitoring wells. Data collected during 2009 documented significant periods of
saturation and surface ponding throughout the site during the early growing season despite below
normal antecedent rainfall totals. While these below normal rainfall totals persisted for several
months, each of three wells exceeded the minimum success for the second year of monitoring
(Table 3).
3
0
0
0
Table 2. Summary of Vegetative Monitoring Data - Year 2
SPECIES PLOT 1 PLOT 2 PLOT 3 PLOT 4 PLOT 5 PLOT 6 TOTAL
River Birch 2 34 23 0 15 26 100
Green Ash 0 0 0 0 0 42 42
Atlantic White Cedar 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Bald Cypress 46 6 0 43 0 3 98
Tulip Poplar 0 1 32 0 46 0 79
Black Gum 0 14 0 7 0 20 41
PLANTED TOTAL 48 55 55 50 61 91 360
Black Willow 8 8
Elderberry 1 1
Winged Sumac 1 1
Sassafras 2 2
Persimmon 1 1
Baccharis 1 1
TOTAL 52 56 56 50 61 99 374
Planted Species
Volunteer Species
11
Table 3. Summary of Hydrologic Monitoring Data - Year 2
Well 2009 Growing Number of Consecutive Days 5% Success
Number Season Meeting Wetland Criteria
Hydrology Criteria
Well 1 March 15 - April 27 44 12
Well 2 March 15 - April 30 47 12
Well 3 March 15 - June 27 105 12
Based on the observed hydroperiods, the site has responded favorably to the prescribed
hydrologic modifications. These modifications have resulted in extended periods of surface
ponding and saturation during the early growing season, which is typical of headwater systems in
the Coastal Plain. As a result, the nutrient and sediment removal functions within the wetland have
been restored, improving water quality and reducing downstream flooding. Appendix C provides
specific data collected during 2009.
4
0
•
VI. Conclusion
Restoration activities have been demonstrated to be successful at the project site through the two
years of annual monitoring. The observed density (623 stems/acre) indicates that the site is
progressing well toward a maturity density of 320 stems/acre. The 2009 hydrologic monitoring
data met the hydrologic success criteria despite below normal precipitation levels. It is anticipated
that normal rainfall conditions throughout the winter and early spring will continue to restore
appropriate hydrologic conditions throughout the headwater wetland system.
•
Reversion of agricultural land to wooded riparian buffer and wetland habitat will decrease source
nutrient loading and concurrently increase nutrient removal capacity. In addition, the project will
provide ancillary benefits to aquatic and wildlife habitat via enhanced niche habitat, microclimate
modification and shade, and increased food-web support. By doing so, the proposed project will
help to effectively mitigate for authorized loss of riparian buffers, streams and wetlands associated
with the Cutter Creek development.
•
5
•
0
0
Toundaries are approximate and
not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: North Carolina Atlas & Gazetteer. Pg 65.2003
Mill Run Development Group
Mussel Run Mitigation Site
Greene County, NC
40-06-303P
LMG
SCALE 1" = 1 Mile
Figure 1
Vicinity Map
0 I 1 1

is
•
U?r•7
-„? -+
t T11
X I ..
l rri i SITE
r
New Zwu
h
k-•
1
I •
.arrtllrYt'IY ?
Ch,
5' r
73 1?
ga
H1i 7 r '
"Boundaries are approximate and are
not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: Hookerton Quadrangle 7.5 minute (topographic) 1990
Mill Run Development Group
Mussel Run Mitigation Site LMG
Greene County, NC
40-06-303P
SCALE 1" = 1500'
Figure 2
USGS Topgraphic Map
0 1 I I

is
Pf,
NoA
L u

0

Boundaries are approximate and arc. ?
not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: MRCS Soil Survey. SCALE 1" = 400'
Mill Run Development Group LM G Run Mitigation Site L1v1 G Figure 3
Greene County, NC Soils Map
40-06-303P
I0
t

Lk
16

tl j
0
0

F'

LAI
J/
7'
wit

y r?
x. ?.
t

Bomid ,nes are approxin _- > and ,,re
not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: 1998 NAPP aerial photography SCALE 1" - 400'
Mill Run Development Group T A _
Mussel Run Mitigation Site L11Y??T Figure 4
Greene County, NC i Aerial Photograph
40-06-303P - "
i9
•
r 1
u
Cypress Pond (1.2 ac.)
CREP Planting (--10ac.)
Existing Roads
Boundaries are approximate and are
not meant to he absolute.
Map Source: 1998 NAPP aerial photography
Mill Run Development Group
Mussel Run Mitigation Site
Greene County, NC
40-06-303P
Legend
Property Boundary
r ?LMG
SCALE 1" = 400'
Figure 5
Restoration Plan
Coastal Plain Headwater Stream Restoration (19.4 ac.)
U]

Plot
Plot #2
AIL
Plot
0

Legend
r:, Monitoring Plot
Monitoring Well
Property Boundary
Channel Alignment (-3,050 If)
Buffer Restoration Area
50' Neuse Buffer Mitigation (5.8 ac.)
Coastal Plain Headwater Stream Restoration (19A ac.)
Cypress Pond (1.2 ac.)
CREP Planting (-10ac.)
Existing Roads
'Boundaries are approximate and are
not meant to be absolute.
Map Source: 1998 NAPP aerial photography
Mill Run Development Group
Mussel Run Mitigation Site % I,
Greene County, NC
40-06-303P
le,
y
• ?`,r 4
°` k • *4
,I+? ? ? a.f "V
SCALE 1" = 400'
Figure 6
Monitoring Plot/Well
Location Map
0
n
u
APPENDIX A.
:1
YEAR 2 MONITORING PLOT DATA

0
0
MUSSEL RUN MITIGATION SITE - GREENE COUNTY
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER
SPECIES STRATUM

T, SA, or SH) Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer
Species Number of Individuals
Counted toward
Success Criteria
River Birch SA 2 2 ft Planted 2
Bald Cypress SA 2 1 ft Planted 2
Bald Cypress SA 13 2 ft Planted 13
Bald Cypress SA 26 3 ft Planted 26
Bald Cypress SA 5 4 ft Planted 5
Sassafras SA 1 1 ft Volunteer 1
Sassafras SA 1 2 ft Volunteer 1
Sumac SA 1 3 ft Volunteer 1
Elderberry SA 1 2 ft Volunteer 1

TOTAL SHRUBS
0 OBSERVED DENSITY
(PER PLOT)
52
TOTAL VOLUNTEER
SPECIES
4 OBSERVED DENSITY
(PER ACRE)
520
TOTAL TREES OF
PLANTED SPECIES
48
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 52
0
0
0

MUSSEL RUN MITIGATION SITE - GREENE COUNTY
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER
SPECIES STRATUM

SA, or SH Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer
Species Number of Individuals
Counted toward
Success Criteria
River Birch SA 1 1 ft Planted 1
River Birch SA 1 2 ft Planted 1
River Birch SA 3 3 ft Planted 3
River Birch SA 8 4 ft Planted 8
River Birch SA 5 5 ft Planted 5
River Birch SA 9 6 ft Planted 9
River Birch SA 7 7 ft Planted 7
Bald Cypress SA 1 1 ft Planted 1
Bald Cypress SA 4 3 ft Planted 4
Bald Cypress SA 1 4 ft Planted 1
Tulip Poplar SA 1 2 ft Planted 1
Black Gum SA 1 1 ft Planted 1
Black Gum SA 2 2 ft Planted 2
Black Gum SA 11 3 ft Planted 11
Persimmon SA 1 2 ft Volunteer 1
TOTAL SHRUBS 0 OBSERVED DENSITY
PER PLOT 56
TOTAL VOLUNTEER
SPECIES
1 OBSERVED DENSITY
(PER ACRE) 560
TOTAL TREES OF
PLANTED SPECIES
55
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 56
•
0
MUSSEL RUN MITIGATION SITE - GREENE COUNTY
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER
SPECIES STRATUM

SA, or SH Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer
Species Number of Individuals
Counted toward
Success Criteria
River Birch SA 1 1 ft Planted 1
River Birch SA 8 2 ft Planted 8
River Birch SA 8 3 ft Planted 8
River Birch SA 1 4 ft Planted 1
River Birch SA 5 5 ft Planted 5
Tulip Poplar SA 16 1 ft Planted 16
Tulip Poplar SA 15 2 ft Planted 15
Tulip Poplar SA 1 3 ft Planted 1
Baccharis SH 1 2 ft Volunteer 1

TOTAL SHRUBS
1 OBSERVED DENSITY
(PER PLOT)
56
TOTAL VOLUNTEER
SPECIES
1 OBSERVED DENSITY
(PERACRE)
560
TOTAL TREES OF
PLANTED SPECIES
55
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 56
0

MUSSEL RUN MITIGATION SITE - GREENE COUNTY
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER
SPECIES STRATUM Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer Number of Individuals
Species Counted toward
Success Criteria
(T, SA, or SH
Bald Cypress SA 7 2 ft Planted 7
Bald Cypress SA 21 3 ft Planted 21
Bald Cypress SA 15 4 ft Planted 15
Black Gum SA 1 1 ft Planted 1
Black Gum SA 4 2 ft Planted 4
Black Gum SA 2 3 ft Planted 2
TOTAL SHRUBS 0 OBSERVED DENSITY 50
PER PLOT
TOTAL VOLUNTEER OBSERVED DENSITY
SPECIES 0 PER ACRE 500
TOTAL TREES OF

PLANTED SPECIES 50
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 50
0

MUSSEL RUN MITIGATION SITE - GREENE COUNTY
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER
SPECIES STRATUM

(T, SA, or SH Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer
Species Number of Individuals
Counted toward
Success Criteria
River Birch SA 1 2 ft Planted 1
River Birch SA 3 4 ft Planted 3
River Birch SA 4 5 ft Planted 4
River Birch SA 5 6 ft Planted 5
River Birch SA 2 7 ft Planted 2
Tulip Poplar SA 7 1 ft Planted 7
Tulip Poplar SA 25 2 ft Planted 25
Tulip Poplar SA 12 3 ft Planted 12
Tulip Poplar SA 1 4 ft Planted 1
Tulip Poplar SA 1 6 ft Planted 1
TOTAL SHRUBS 0 OBSERVED DENSITY
(PER PLOT) 61
TOTAL VOLUNTEER
SPECIES
0 OBSERVED DENSITY
(PER ACRE)
610
TOTAL TREES OF
PLANTED SPECIES 61
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 61

0
w
MUSSEL RUN MITIGATION SITE - GREENE COUNTY
ANNUAL MONITORING DATA SHEET - VEGETATION PLOTS
PLOT NUMBER
SPECIES STRATUM

T, SA, or SH Number of Individuals HEIGHT Planted vs. Volunteer
Species Number of Individuals
Counted toward
Success Criteria
River Birch SA 24 1 ft Planted 24
River Birch SA 2 2 ft Planted 2
Green Ash SA 7 1 ft Planted 7
Green Ash SA 35 2 ft Planted 35
Bald Cypress SA 1 2 ft Planted 1
Bald Cypress SA 2 3 ft Planted 2
Black Gum SA 3 1 ft Planted 3
Black Gum SA 16 2 ft Planted 16
Black Gum SA 1 3 ft Planted 1
Black Willow SA 3 2 ft Volunteer 3
Black Willow SA - 4 3 ft Volunteer 4
Black Willow SA 1 4 ft Volunteer 1
TOTAL SHRUBS 0 OBSERVED DENSITY
(PER PLOT) 99
TOTAL VOLUNTEER
SPECIES
13 OBSERVED DENSITY
(PER ACRE)
990
TOTAL TREES OF
PLANTED SPECIES 91
TOTAL INDIVIDUALS 99
0
APPENDIX B.
'* 2009 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
0

A view of a bald cypress seedling observed in Plot 1.
!jq r

s

r1
L
. T 'a Hay :.n
Mussel Run
Headwater Restoration Project
September 2009
? LMG
Imington, N.C.
W9
Site Documentation
Photos

0
A view of a river birch seedling observed at Plot 3.

8 µ
??Y 'Y?'.
C. Y
{ t
_ ? 2 Y 4' t 4 ?` ? 't [`
Mussel Run
Headwater Restoration Project
September 2009
?LMG
Iminqton, N.C.
b ?. +
5' x t
Site Documentation
Photos
A view of plantings at Plot 4.
A view of a tulip poplar seedling observed at Plot 5.
I•

10

0
i t 5 t ?1d ' t
k, l
' ! F ,fir ' lr f'1
., }-' ????y.,.:` ie. 4A`• .fin Cif
A view of plantings at Plot 6.
C
.t t. aA
£" 'y 'ff
? ? ? ttt
g @ s
i"y
y ,
i
f y
A view of the hydrologic monitoring installed at Plot 6.
Mussel Run
Headwater Restoration Project L?. ?? Site Documentation
, Photos
September 2009 -
Wilmington, N.C.

APPENDIX C.
HYDROGRAPHS (WELLS 1-3) - 2009

A
G
00
0
0
N
c
7
Q
O
B
LM
0?4
no
804 0
Ste,
0Ol4
O^
O
004
^S
00,4
?^O
0?4? o
n o
r`
S
oO, i
??lv o
! O
007' ? M
00
??LG m
00 !c' o
CO
00T 9! ?
m
% m
19
?Z9
007 _Z
Y
0O.
a6l
00?
ad
!?
?'Ol
ad
.9!
00J01
d
O,
9
(S)OJ
O O W n O ? V M N ? O a6;
(SOWWO uoije;idloaJd
c
o
m co .? 'a cwo
Ri W
0 Z 0 0
°W *4 >
c
C
zm
°.',
M=
a00?
E m c?
n
Eai w
c.
0CHV .
c °us?
= d O
V C
Q 0
`o C _
? V
° ~

a„v).., Z3
e° oY...

Precipitation (in)
O
r O CO rl- (O (n V CO N - O
(O O (O N N V O (O
N M M
(Sayoul) lene-1 jejeM e3e:pnS/punojE)
O
V
W
m
0
.L
0
C
O

00,
?^
O
S
004
7^
O
004 ?'
^S
00,4 !
?^O
00,4
nS
(90,
00 ?!F
.00, 9e
00 2
00T !
(9 ?!!
O?
190, a9
00? ?'
ad
o?
a9
00"
ad
!
00,
a9
?OJ
ad
C
0
4.0
m a
mz `
Y = M 0 Q.
m c ?IL °? cCD c
U V 0 N N O lid E
G1 N C tD M M O
Q 7
020,433Q70 m
A . ? . . . ? A
T
d
M
Cn
Q
N ?
C
CO
m Cu
Q C
N N
J (n
W Z
(O LL-
tf) 0,
ono U
CO
Cl)
J J
J >J
V
CL
= -W
O at
=
o
as
?E
eo
c
co
J

r
0
ao
Q
O
N
i.
E
2
CL
m
U)
O
L
19 °a
aS
G
80,E c'
aS
n
c'
190,
aS
90a G!
aS
n
000, !
aS6'
90 0
ob
n
806, f
0
9 Od, ? oM
0, 6,
fib, m
S o
0066 >
O
?
Ol k; CO
9 s! °'
O, a
6a
O
90*,>
9 Z
190,
Y
Y? ,
00
^9?
0%
6)Ol
n,
`9!
0%
0Ol
^Z9
90/

(seyouj) uoi;e;idIoeJd

a L c
o
?
d C W
cc M
U) M- U) 00
*4
Cr
0 Z 0 ?
cc V >
C
*MR
W
Z
W Z C
'a 00 w
c ` LiJ m
aEcn
.
O c o

o
CL - CD Zv
"0
?
?C
o c
o I,
3
awv)., CO oY
Precipitation (in)
0
O OD h CO LO q M N - O
(0 O (O N a0 V O (o
N M M
(seyouI) iene-i je;eM eoejjns/punojF)
'a
L
O
V
0
O
2
(POI
a
aS
G
SOa
aS
000' c'
aS
s
80,v !
90V
aSb'
000
aSis
sOG
fib,
O
906 r
fib,
s
806, ?
906 Oc'
s
006 !
fib,
O
006 !
?O)?>
00)?
^19
00
!
00
9!
190,
!
00l
n9
90
!
?n
c
O
o V o
m Z O
a+ N
G M O G.
M
U D: C? N N E
d M r
G1 N
7 d O' G1 % O' 0 9
N
to
Q
N
v W
CO
CO M CO M
Q C
N ?
J (/)
wz
> _
+ ¦
LL
0 U
Q Q
CO
J J
Jj J
V
a
O ?
I E
ea 3
= 33
ca
J
I•
10
•
0
0
0
N
L
W
m
V
d
?a
E
CD
O
O
L
500
dO
O
500 F
ap
s
80,J c'
d0
5 00 Oc'
aO
s
50 J !
a?0!
0 a
°a o
O
S
50
1O o
5 'L.00 0
O,1O/P,
s o
So 10 >
0
`Q01 o
5 ohs! Q
O,
-7o? Q
O
Oro 0?
?S z
50! Y
00? ?
501
009
50,
O
0,
01
5 C'
00,
Sol
O
0,
SOY
0029
501
O O W I- O LO V M N - O JQ!
(sayOul) uoi;e;idioaJd

t
'C i '? C
+?+ O
ea t+
C m Crn
ON
to
W
m E Y a
U 0
-3z
evt C
v m o W
E
C L
CL w
.
O C -
C w v o i
OX
-

C
ac N
CD z

L
ti0 C
o
41
°
IL WL, U)

Precipitation (in)
oaZ 3

0
? O W r O n q M N ?- O
O O (O N CO O (O
1 17 N M C?
(sayoul) iana-i -ia;eM aae}jng/punojE)
0
m
Q1
C
.L
c
O

500
ap
5 00 Oa0
S
Q0,00
p
O
80, J c'
a0
S
50l 00
?
D
8OJ [
a?S
50,10
0 05
?Pl
7
O?
S
507 c'
?tio
Soy z
610 0?0
50 !
10
lp,
SOY
J0!
501
JO
9
501
O
0,
501 ?'
00,
SoY IQ/
J0!
501
J09
501
J0!
C
O
•a v
z o
o M
m 00 N d
Y ?

C
c
7 M

Od

N M °.

m
CL
C
N
L C
'd
E
N G> M
D r
M m
?
y m
? m
0
G7
> > m t
° m ?
d c

C?
X.
0
a 2
00
0
m

M
Q
N N
v m
CD
M
00
N ?
J fn
w z
?LL
?0)
U
CO
Q Q
CO
J J
>J >J
V
C.
C 'w.'
d
o
? c.
C O
a?
I
C
C
e0
J

U
10
rn
0
0
N
V
L
Ca
2
O
O
L
??u
so? z
z
so?
6' ?
6O?
s ` o
Ol
? o
609 CO
y
6 S? m
0,90
y
OC
0C
,9 0
'rs, +
60,
9a 3l
c
0! 00,
40
y
S U)
6°G? Y
s0 `i
^9
6?G
6?G
`On,
6 `9!
O,G
!!
6'
Z9
6'G
O O O n O ? ? M N .- O ?'n
(smpuj) uoi;e}idiaald
t ++ O

m e`a .a cc .
'a a
'ca H O
U) 0N?

0 Z v
C w
??+~le>
LV
m C+O+ 'v?Z m

v CO O
t°
E
M
a mw
C.
oc °' cc
0L.
0 N v N

V
a o ~c0 `c
gCc CO
v
a4- U) M oY 3
Precipitation (in)
0
? m CO r- O to V CO N - O
(o O (O N o2 V O (D
N M M
(seyoui) iene-IJe;eM eoelins/punois
'a
O
V
'L
c
0

6O:/
so
6' C'
s ?!
O?
6'
s ?
O?
009
y
S
609 C:-,
y
609 Oc'
l
ys
6'0,9 !
yo
6'09 !
yS
6'G
s°G
^9
6' G c'
c'
,G
00
s `9!
O,G
Gn
O,G
6 9
O,G
G^
C
O
V
p1 Z

C
M W
0

o `

Q
Y
4) C ' o a ad c`!
N c
aa)
L
V U V) N ? E

d
N 41 M
d t6 r
N
d? M
v N m
O
c m m CO c
n2 0 ca
?. . A . . . . . A .
d
N
Q
N N
IT
M a, M 0
?
ED
Q c
N (6
J (n
w z_
Y
LL
rn
00
N M
Q Q
.- M
J J
J1 J
T

Q
= 4-
0 d
=
fl.
? O
E
C
c?
`a
C
c?
J

0
IS
•
0)
0
0
N
Gi
C
E
0
p
6"G
6'°G S
nS
6'°G
7n
O?
60,G
SSG
?n
6'
OlG? o
n, O
S
6'O,
61, t1, CO
6O 0?91 o
TG? ?
6'° `c' o
r CO
`6GG ?
a°? 9
m
GG?
a
6'O Z 'm
6° 9
? Z
Y
S°J
aIQ
6° J z
ab
6o,
?a 9
S°?
6O,
a9
6'' J
O O) oD I? M ? V M N r O ab
(sayaul) uoi;epdioa-ld

a m o
m,
d ? ?
ev N °'• a ego
0
N?
Z `
°W
oE
?
?
m ,
?
Vo
z o
c
m 00
U)

Cc
C (4 N
0
a 4-
R v
C CD z (a
r
. 0
0
0 C F-
:
F- 0
?z 0
CL U) v o
M 02
v

Precipitation (in)
0
M W h M LO V M N r O
CO O (O N o2 V O (O
N M M
(say3ul) lana-1 -ja;eM aoepng/punwE)
V
0
v
m
C
Z
0
C
0

6'"G
7^
6' Ol O
7^
S
6OG
?^
O
6'°G
1S
60'
^S
6'0
60 ?`o
00, 9e
c'
60,
6" t
6,
6'O
O,
a9
6O,
s `C'
o?
a9
S°J
ad
6OL
a9
60'
ad

0
? V a
? Z
`
M O) Q
C IL O O C
V N of E
U H O
C
b CD ? 0
M m o
0 (
41 0 NN .
3
t? 7
?
C7 m
?
3 a 3 C
?r Q ? 0 R

LO
0
Cn
N
(0 a,
M ?
m
<
N (6
J cn
w Z
Y
LL
LO _0
0
00 U
Q Q
r M
J J
J >J

Q.
7
v
o =
t' fl.
O
E E
C
ca
J
0
I•
0
U
CD
0
0
N
L
Q
E
fl.
d
N
O
O
L
so00
s
ss
c'
oq as
n
c'
00,Q as
6
sO,q !
!
V19
6100, C)
n
6'06 '
0
(n
6 06O^ °
Ob, m
6' rc'
066 >
O
60, M
s 606 ? a
?6 M
M
O a
?
606 !
?S Z_
600 Y
n
!O
6'0,
9
60"
?0
60/0
9
600
n,
!!
soli
Z9
60/
O m N r-(D LOV M N a- O In
(S043ul) UOge;idioeJd
L C
%.0
d to ?
?o N 'C era
O N d

0 Z V W V>
C +
Z vm
ar C+O+
'C O o ea ` W M
C . E
O C r 0. V) N
0° W) 3
M C N Y
C N
ti
?
0 C
a O w o
ad CI- C
?o2 a
CD
w

Precipitation (in)
O
O W n O In V M N - O
(D O (D N e2 V O (D
N M M
(seyoui) iane-j je;eM aoe}ung/punoaE)
V
O
ci
d
C
.`
40
0
2
60a
as
6 s
0a
as
n
c'
bO 919
s
soa s/
as
soa !
aSs
6' 0,0,
?s?
606'
6,hb06, ,
O(n
fib,
S
6'06, c'
76
60" Oc'
09
6O6 !
O
606 !
so
n
!O
6'O,
lijn
60'),
!C,
60,
60/ n9!
O^
60/
60/
On
C
O
c V o 0
m z o
'a+ N m
C M O C.
m 3 0 a O 1- C
V V MO N N 'C E
d CO r 4) t0
0-6
3 3 m? d? ? d d ti
c
5v)0 m

m
w
CO am
LL rn
U 3
m m
w F
c
N Cu
-j of
J W
W Z
LL
(n rn
N Cl)
Q Q
r M
J J
J J
1LLJ LU N
T I
v
C
Q
3 4a
O d
=
? Q
? O
d E
C
m
J
0