NCG160053_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20160406

Ab��lt Vo
STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
NCG PERMITS
PERMIT NO.
/V u, � G G G 3
DOC TYPE
C�'-HISTORICAL FILE
DMONITORING REPORTS
DOC DATE
❑ rx))
YYYYMMDD

April 6, 2016
Mr. Cory Larsen
Environmental Engineer
Raleigh Regional Office
3800 Barrett Drive
Raleigh, North Carolina 27609
Subject: NPDES Stormwater Compliance Evaluation Inspection
Certificate of Coverage NCG 160053
S. T. Wooten Corporation — Sims Asphalt Plant
Dear Mr. Cory Larsen,
S.T. Wooten
Corporation
In responding to your report dated February 18, 2016 1 am sending you the following
information for items 1, 2, and 3.
1. The (SPPP) is under revision now and should be finished this month.
2. The site map will be redrawn to reflect the shingles and the recycle asphalt in the
piles. These piles are depleted from time to time but will be on the map and in the
(SPPP). The low -ling area has been graded and seeded and will be monitored to
be sure the vegetation is established.
3. All outfalls are being added to the (SPPP) and will be sampled if there is flow.
All outfalls will be monitored going forward and I do plan to request
representative outfall for three of the outfalls.
I will put the hard copy of this letter in the mail today.
Should you require further information, please give me a call.
Office 919-779-9752 Ex. 127
Cell: 252-290-5912
Email iames.washburnnastwcorn.com
T.
Tames Washburn
Environmental Compliance Manager
�M Pl#*
�r
00
PO Box 2408 • Wilson, NC 27894-2408
v
N�
252.291.516.5 • Fax [phone]

a

PAT MCCRORY
Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
secretary
March 7, 2016
JAMES WASHBURN— ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE MANAGER
ST WOOTEN CORPORATION
PO Box 2408
WILSON, NORTH CAROLINA 27894
Subject: Multimedia Compliance Inspection
ST Wooten Corporation — Sims Plant
Wilson County
Dear Pemuttee:
Department of Environment and Natural Resources staff from the Raleigh Regional Office conducted a
multimedia compliance inspection of ST Wooten Corporation— Sims Plant on December 4, 2015 for
permits and programs administered by the following Divisions:
Division of Air
Division of Energy,
Division of Water
Division of Waste
Quality
Mineral, and Land
Resources
Management
Resources
We appreciate your cooperation during the inspection and hope that you have enjoyed the benefit of our
initiative to provide a single inspector capable of handling multiple areas of environmental compliance at
your facility. The results of each applicable inspection and any associated response actions or necessary
corrective measures are detailed in the inspection letters/reports attached to this transmittal sheet. If a
Division report is not attached, you may assume compliance with that particular Division's rules and
regulations at the time of inspection.
If you have any questions regarding this multimedia inspection or the results of each program inspection,
please contact the Raleigh Regional Office at [phone] and ask to speak with the appropriate Division
staff. Thank you for your cooperation.
encl: Air Quality Inspection Report
Stormwater Inspection Report
cc: DAQ RRO Files
DEMLR RRO Files
DWR RRO Files
DWM RRO Files
State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality I Air Quality
Raleigh Regional Office 1 3800 Barrett Drive I Raleigh, NC 27609
919 7914200 T 1919 9812261 F

AUK1H cAHULLVA V1v151UN OF . . I - •
Raleigh Regional Office -
AIR QUALITY
S. T. Wooten Asphalt Mixing Services LLC
NC Facility ID 9800122
Inspection Report
County/FIPS: Wilson/195
Date:,12/17/2015
Facility Data
Permit Data
S. T. Wooten Asphalt Mixing Services LLC
Permit .01331 / R14
6148 Green Pond Road
Issued'"4/28/2011
Sims, NC '27880
Expires 3/31/2016
Lat: 35d 46.0560m Long: 78d 3.5610m
Classification Synthetic Minor
SIC: 2951 / Paving Mixtures And Blocks
Permit Status Active
NAICS: 324121 / Asphalt Paving Mixture and Block Manufacturing
Current Permit Application(s) Renewal
Program Applicability
Contact Data
Facility Contact
Authorized Contact
Technical Contact
SIP
James Washburn
Brian Gurganus
James Washburn
NSPS:.Subpart I
Environmental
Vice President
Environmental
Compliance Manager
[phone]
Compliance Manager
[phone]
[phone]
Comments:
Compliance Data
Inspection Date .
.2/04/2015
Inspector's Name Maureen Conner
Inspector's Signature:
V�
Operating Status, Operating
Compliance Code Compliance - inspection
Action Code ' FCE
Date of Signature:
� �}
On -Site Inspection Result Compliance
Zvi
Total Actual emissions in TONS/YEAR: '
TSP
S02
NOX
VOC
CO
PM10
HAI
2014
2.40
8.90
3.70
2.20
6.70
1.70
292.00
2010
6.70
18.34
10.20
6.90
19.20
4.30
893.00
*
Hi hest HAP Emitted (in pounds)
Five Year Violation History; None
Date Letter Type Rule Violated Violation Resolution Date
Performed Stack Tests since last FCE: None
Date Test Results Test Method(s) Source(s) Tested
i
DIRECTION TO SITE: From Raleigh, take the beltline to US-264 E/ US-64 E via EXIT 14 toward WILSON/ ROCKY MOUNT.
Merge onto US-264 E toward NC-97/ WILSON/ GREENVILLE. Remain on US 264 Highway (cast) until the Sims Exit.
Take the Sims Exit (SR1301) (south). S.T. Wooten Asphalt Mixing Services, LLC is located off of SR 1301 approximately
three tenths (0.3) of a mile from the end of the exit ramp.

(II) SAFETY NEEDS: As with all facility visits, standard safety gear (steel -toed shoes, hard hat, safety glasses and hearing
protection) is to be wom.
(111) FACILITY DESCRIPTION: S T Wooten.— Sims Plant operates a rotary drum -type asphalt plant at this site. The asphalt
plant is rated at 350 tons per hour. S T Wooten — Sims Plant has —3 employees and operates 10 hours/day 5 days/week-
(IV) INSPECTION SUMMARY: On December 4, 2015, I, Maureen Conner along with Ray Williams (DWM) and
Cory Larsen (DWR), performed a compliance inspection at ST Wooten asphalt mixing facility in Sims, North
Carolina as part of a multimedia pilot inspection program.
We met with Jimmy Washburn, Environmental Compliance Manager for the inspection. The plant was not operating
at the time of the inspection. I observed 0%VE and no fugitive emissions beyond the property boundary. The
facility currently brings in virgin (factory defect) shingles from Certain T.
(V) IONS SOURCES
Sorlce ID _.... , . _
u
Emission Source ControControl System- "I
PERMITTED EMISSIONS Descnption ; System ID ; Description
_.
mix asphalt plant (350 tons per hour capacity)
;SAP-4 (NSPS) I natural gas / No. 2 fuel oil/recycled No ; CDAP-4.1,
2 fuel oil / No. 4 fuel oil/recycled No 4 CDAP4
fuel oil -fired rotary drum -type asphalt ji
nlant„ 350 tons/hr, 93. million 13tuthr
-... . illieat innuf _-...,._ .1 ...,...
one 9 feet in diameter by 10
long) in series with a bagfilte
842 square feet of filter area)
ESAL-4 1, ESAL-4 2 ' two hot asphalt load out stations with
ESAL43, ESAL44, I three load out points each N/A N/A _ ESAL45, ESAL46
JESAS4. 1, ESAS-4 2, i six 300 ton'asphalt storage silos
ESAS-4.3, ESAS 4 4, i F7N/Allj N/A ;
ESAS4.5, ESAS4.6
Appeared Ito be in compliance, the list appears I
to reflect the equipment at the site. Facility was not operating at
the time of the inspection: .
(VI) SPECIFIC PERMIT CONDITIONS Air Permit No. 1331R12 includes the following specific conditions::
A.1: Applicable Regulations: The permittee shall comply with 15A NCAC Subchapter 2D .0202, 0506, .0515,
.0516, .0521; .0524 (40 CFR 60, SubpartI), .0535, .0540, .0611, .1100 .1806, and 2Q..0315; .0317 (Avoidance),
.0700, and 2Q .0711. Appeared to be incompliance. See stipulations below for information on specific' conditions.
A.2 2D .0202 Emission Inventory Requirement. The company is required that within 907days of their permit
expiration, and if they are requesting renewal, they must submit an emission inventory. Appeared to be in compliance:
1 remindedMri Washbarn that the company will have to submit an emission inventory in 2016for the year of 2014.
A.3 2D .0506 Particulate Control Requirement for Asphalt Plants. Particutlate matter envisions rates below
limit. VE shall be less than 20% when averaged over a six -minute period. Fugitive dust emissions shall be controlled
as required by 15A NCAC 2D .0540. Fugitive emissions for sources at a hot mix asphalt plant: not covered'.
elsewhere finder this Rule shall not exceed 20 percent opacity averaged over six minutes Appeared to be in
compliance, the facility has 'a scavenger circuit As long as they operate their control devices they should be in
compliance with their air permit The facility was not operating at the time, therefore there was 0% opacity
observed and no fugitive dust was observed,
A.4 2D .0515, Particulate Emission Limitations particulate matter emissions from the affected 'e'mission
sources fisted in the permit shall not exceed allowable emission rates which are determined based on process
throughput rates using the equations provided in the permit. Appeared to be in compliance, per permit review.

A.5 , 2D .0516 Sulfur dioxide emission from combustion sources. S02 from the fuel burning equipment shall not
exceed 2.3 lbs/mmBtu. Appeared to be in compliance. The Company has been using only natural gas since the last
inspection. Since natural gas is low in sulfur, compliance is assumed.
A.6 2D .0521 Control of Visible Emission. VE from the permitted items at the facility shall not exceed 20%
opacity. Appears to be in compliance. The facility was not operating and VE was 0% opacity from all of the
sources.
A.7 2D .0524 New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) Requirements The Permittee shall comply with all
applicable provisions of 40 CFR 60 Subpart I -Standard of Performance for Hot Mix Asphalt Facility. Appears to be
in compliance. The facility was not operating and VE was 0% opacity from all of the sources.
A.8 2D .0535 Excess Emission Reporting and Malfunctions When particulate, visible, sulfur dioxide, volatile
organic compounds, odorous and /or visible emissions exceed environmental regulations for more than 4 hours, the
NCDAQ must be notified. Appeared to be in compliance. The facility stated that they had not operated in an upset
state.
A.9 . 213.0540 Particulates from FuettiveNon' Process Dust Emission Sources. The purpose of this rule is to
control fugitive non -process dust emissions from such items as haul. roads, stock piles, parking lots and yards... This
is a complaint driven stipulation. Appeared to be in compliance. The facility has a pavedparking lot No fugitive
dust was observed and the facility has not received any complaints.
A.10 2D .0611 Cyclone Requirements Establish inspection, maintenance and recordkeeping requirements for the
cyclones at the facility. Appeared to be in compliance. The company does daily inspections of their cyclone system,
when in operation
A.11 2D .0611 Fabric Filter Requirement, The pennittee is to maintain, inspect' and record the results of these
activities. Appeared to be incompliance.,''The company keeps daily records of the magnehelie gauge reading and
does a monthly internal check. The last one was performed 1112712011,
A.12 2D .1100, Toxic Air Pollutant Emission Limitations: the Permittee shall not exceed the toxic emission
limits specified in the permit.. The facility has not made any changes to process or equipment that would increase
their toxic emissions, _therefore they appear to be in compliance with. their permit
A.13 213.1806 Control and Prohibition of Odorous Emissions May not produce odorous emissions that can cause
or contribute to objectionable odors beyond the facility boundaries. Appeared to be in compliance, no odors were
detected and the facilityhas not received any complaints.
A.14 2Q .0315, Synthetic Minor Facilities. Allows a company to accept limit(s) placed into their permit to avoid
the procedures of 15A NCAC 2Q .0500. Appeared to be in compliance. The facility is limited to 1,400,000 rpy and
in 1014 theyproduced 51,727 tons of asphalt TheJlue is restricted to less than 0.5% sulfur by weigh4 the facility
is complying with this by burning only natural gas. The facility reported that they emitted 3.58 tons of CO and
1.51 tons of NOx so far in 2014.
i
A.15 2Q .0317 Allows for the avoidance of 2D .0530, "Prevention of Significant Deterioration," by accepting
limits elsewhere in the permit. Appears to be in compliance because they appear to be in compliance with the
synthetic minor condition.
A.16 2Q .0317 Allows for the avoidance of 2Q .0700 so the firm may bum RECYCLED No(s)2 and 4 FUEL
OIL REOUIREMENM The Permittee is allowed to use the recycled fuel oil(s) supplied by a DAQ-approved
vendor. Appeared to be in compliance. The facility has no recycled fuel oil on site.
A.17 2Q .0317 Allows for the avoidance of 2Q .0700 so the firm may use recycled shingles. Appeared to be in
compliance. The facility is currently only using virgin shingle rejects.

A.18 2Q .0711 Toxic Air Pollutant Emission Limitation. This is a list of chemicals the facility has triggered for
toxic review, that's potential have not exceeded the TEPR for that given chemical. Appears to be in compliance,
per permit review.
EXEMPT EMISSION SOURCES:
Source
1(ESAB-4) - six 30 ton aggregate bins
1.1 (ESA13 4) - associated conveyors for six 30 ton
,regate bins
2.1 (ESSH-4.4) - No. 2 fuel oil -fired heater, 2
nBtu/hr heat input, associated with three 300 ton
Exemption
Source of
Source of Title V
Regulation
TAPS?
Pollutants?
_0102
F No T
Yes
.0102
No I Yes
Yes it Yes
IS-3 (ESDC-4.5) -one drag conveyor
2Q.0102 Yes
(c)(2)(E
Yes
IS-4 (ESLA-4 2) 30,000 gallon liquid asphalt cement
2Q 0102 yes
Yes
tank
IS41 (ESLAH4.3) - No 2 fuel oil fired heater (2
I2Q 0102
FYes
I
mmBtu/hr heat input), associated with 30,000 gallon
Yes
(c)(2)(13)(i)(1)
Y ^ -
_
Tj
IS-4 (ESLA 4 3 3Q,000 gallon liquid asphalt cement
SLA9,000
J
2Q 0102
Yes.....
;�
IS 4 (ESLA-4 4 30,000 gallon liquid asphalt cement
tank ,.
2Q .0102 yes
(c)(1)(D)Ol
Yes
Appeared to be in compliance. No new equipment was observed.,
(VIII) 112(r) APPLICABILITY: 112r is not applicable to this facility.,
(IX) COMPLIANCE HISTORY: There were no NOVs listed in the [BEAM database for this facility.
(X) PERFORMANCE TESTING REVIEW: There has been no testing in the last five years.
(XI) CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS: At the time of this inspection, this facility appeared to be in compliance with all
permitted requirements. It is recommended that the facility be re -inspected in one (1) year.

PAT MCCRORY
G.,, mor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
Secretory
Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
February 18, 2016
MR. JAMES WASHBURN — ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE MGR.
ST WOOTEN CORPORATION
PO BOX 2408
WILSON, NORTH CAROLINA 27894
Subject: NPDES Stormwater Compliance Evaluation Inspection
COC Number NCG 160053
ST Wooten — Sims Plant
NCG 160000 General Permit for Asphalt Paving Mixtures and Blocks
Wilson County
Dear Mr. Washburn,
S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
m—,.
Staff from the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) conducted a stormwater compliance
inspection on December 4, 2015 for permit no. NCG160053 as part of a multimedia inspection of the
subject facility. We appreciate the assistance you and other plant personnel provided during the
inspection. Please reference the attached inspection report checklist and summary in addition to the
comments provided below.
The facility was not operating the day of the inspection but appeared reasonably well -managed and a
stormwater management program has been implemented; however, a number of items do require your
attention to achieve full compliance as follows:
1. The stormwater pollution prevention plan (SPPP) was complete based on the presence of all
essential elements but will require revision based on the finding of the inspection and items
below. Update the site plan, stormwater monitoring program, and all other affected SPPP
components as necessary.
2. Walkthrough of the site revealed several massive rap, shingle, and/or waste piles in the southern
half of the property that were not depicted on the SPPP site plan (reference the enclosed aerial
photography). These areas are part of your industrial activity must be added to the site plan and
maintained under the SPPP. One ►ow -lying area was observed acting as a discrete stormwater
conveyance along the fence line near a shingle pile and is not currently monitored. Unless the
area is regraded and stabilized with vegetation to promote sheet flow off the property, this
stormwater discharge outfall (SDO) location must be monitored for analytical and qualitative
parameters.
Two other discharge points (sediment basins) were observed that must be accounted for in the
SPPP. Only two (2) outfall locations have been properly identified and monitored so far out of a
possible five (5). All outfalls must be monitored going forward as discussed during the
inspection..A request for representative outfall status will be considered by DEQ if you wish to
pursue that option.
Division of Water Resources, Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Operations Section www.ncwaterquality.org
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Phone: [phone]
Location: 3800 Barrett Drive, Raleigh, NC 27609 Fax: [phone]

February 18, 2016
Page 2 of 2
Please provide a written response to the above items within 30 days of receipt of this letter.. Your
response should include measures taken to address the above compliance items and/or a schedule for their
completion. If you have any questions regarding these matters, please ,contact me at
cory.larsen(i�ncdenr. og_v or 919-791-4200.
Sincerely, p�
Cory rse PE
Environmental Engineer
Raleigh Regional Office
Encl: Compliance Inspection Repoli
Site Aerial Photo
cc: RRO/SWP Files

Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG160053 Effective: 10/02/14 Expiration: 09/30/19 Owner: S T Woolen Corporation
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: S T Wooten Corporation- Sims
County: Wilson 6148 Greenpond Rd
Region: Raleigh
Sims NC 27880
Contact Person: James Washburn Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
On -site representative
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 12/04/2015
Primary Inspector: Cory Larsen
Secondary Inspector(s):
Certification: Phone:
James Washburn 252-290-5912
Entry Time: 09:30AM Exit Time: 11:30PM
Phone: [phone]
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Asphalt Paving Mixture Stormwater Discharge CDC
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG160053 Owner- Facility: S T Wooten Corporation
Inspection Date: 12/04/2015 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
A multi -media program compliance inspection was conducted by staff from the Division of Water Resources, Air Quality,
and Waste Management on December 4 2015 to evaluate compliance with NPDES stormwater and air quality permits
issued to the facility. The stormwater inspection results for NCG160053 are presented below.
The stormwater pollution prevention plan (SPPP) was reviewed and was complete based on the presence of all essential
elements, however, the SPPP will need be revised based on the findings of the site walk-through. A review of analytical
monitoring included one tier 1 response due to 220 mg/L TSS at SDO 2 in 2015. Result from next event was below
benchmark.
The existing site plan does not depict massive rap, shingle, and/or waste piles in the rear of the site. These areas must be
added to the site plan and maintained under the SPPP. One low-lying area was observed acting as an outfall along the
fence line near a shingle pile and is not currently monitored. If not monitored going forward, it may be regraded and
vegetated to promote sheet flow off the property.
Two other sediment basins were observed that appear to discharge and should be added to the SPPP. Division staff
discussed the possibility of representative outfall status (ROS) and explained that the request must be made in writing if
desired. Only 2 of 4 outfall locations have been properly identified and monitored so far. ROS may be an option otherwise
all outfalls must be monitored going forward. The site appeared reasonably well kept and maintained and was not operating
at the time of inspection.
Page: 2

Permit: NCG160053
Inspection Date: 12/04/2015
Owner. Facility: S T Wooten Corporation
Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
®El ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
Q
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
®�
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
S Q
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
Q ❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
-0 ❑ Q ❑
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
0❑ Q ❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
■ ❑ ❑ El
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
0 ❑ Q ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
M ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Site plan is incomplete and only covers a portion of the site Must revise to include features in
rear of site and all outfall locations.
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Completed for 2 outfalls.
Analytical Monitoring
Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
0❑ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: One tier one response due to 220 mg/L TSS at SDO 2 in 2015
Result from next event was
below benchmark.
Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? M El Q ❑
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? Y ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ 11 0 ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? i ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Only 2 of 4 outfall locations have been properly identified and monitored so far. ROS may be
option otherwise all outfalls must be monitored going forward
Page: 3

Wf.
PAT MCCRORY
', Governor
DONALD R. VAN DER VAART
« Secretory
Water Resources
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY S. JAY ZIMMERMAN
nr..nn.
February 18, 2016
MR. JAMES WASHBURN - ENVIRONMENTAL, COMPLIANCE MGR.
ST WOOTEN CORPORATION
PO Box 2408
WILSON, NORTH CAROLINA 27894
Subject: NPDES Stormwater Compliance Evaluation Inspection
COC Number NCG 160053
ST Wooten — Sims Plant
NCG 160000 General Permit for Asphalt Paving Mixtures and Blocks
Wilson County
Dear Mr. Washburn,
Staff from the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) conducted a stormwater compliance
inspection on December 4, 2015 for permit no. NCG160053 as part of a multimedia inspection of the
subject facility. We appreciate the assistance you and other plant personnel provided during the
inspection. Please reference the attached inspection report checklist and summary in addition to the
comments provided below.
The facility was not operating the day of the inspection but appeared reasonably well -managed and a
stormwater management program has been implemented; however, a number of items do require your
attention to achieve full compliance as follows:
1. The stormwater pollution prevention plan (SPPP) was complete based on the presence of all
essential elements but will require revision based on the finding of the inspection and items
below. Update the site plan, stormwater monitoring program, and all other affected SPPP
components as necessary. .
2. Walkthrough of the site revealed several massive rap, shingle, and/or waste piles in the southern
half of the property that were not depicted on the SPPP site plan (reference the enclosed aerial
photography). These areas are part of your industrial activity must be added to the site plan and
maintained under the SPPP. One low-lying area was observed acting as a discrete stormwater
conveyance along the fence line near a shingle pile and is not currently monitored. Unless the
area is regraded and stabilized with vegetation to promote sheet flow off the property, this
stormwater discharge outfall (SDO) location must be monitored for analytical and qualitative
parameters.
3. Two other discharge points (sediment basins) were observed that must be accounted for in the
SPPP. Only two (2) outfall locations have been properly identified and monitored so far out of a
possible five (5). All outfalls must be monitored going forward as discussed during the
inspection. A request for representative outfall status will be considered by DEQ if you wish to
pursue that option.
Division of Water Resources, Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Operations Section www.ncwaterquality.org
1628 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1628 Phone: [phone]
Location: 3800 Barrett Drive, Raleigh, NC 27609 Fax: [phone]

. A
February 18, 2016 ..
Page 2 of 2
Please provide a written response to the above items within 30 days of receipt of this letter. Your
response should include measures'taken to address the above compliance items and/or a schedule for their
completion. If you have any questions regarding these matters, please contact me at
cory.larsen(ancdenr.gov or 919-791-4200.
Sincerely, p� Q
Cory rse PE
Environmental Engineer
Raleigh Regional Office
Encl: Compliance Inspection Report
Site Aerial Photo
cc: RRO/SWP Files

Wi .
Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG160053 Effective: 10/02/14 Expiration: 09/30/19 Owner: S T Wooten Corporation
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility:. S T Wooten Corporation- Sims
County: Wilson 6148 Greenpond Rd
Region: Raleigh
Sims NC 27880
Contact Person: James Washburn Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s):
On -site representative
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 12/04/2015
Primary Inspector: Cory Larsen
Secondary Inspector(s):
Certification: Phone:
James Washburn 252-290-5912
Entry Time: 09:30AM Exit Time: 11:30PM
Phone: [phone]
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Asphalt Paving Mixture Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: ❑ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
E Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page: 1

Permit: NCG160053 Owner- Facility: S T Woolen Corporation
Inspection Date: 12/04/2015 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary:
A multi -media program compliance inspection was conducted by staff from the Division of Water Resources, Air Quality,
and Waste Management on December 4 2015 to evaluate compliance with NPDES stormwater and air quality permits
issued to the facility. The stormwater inspection results for NCG160053 are presented below.
The stormwater pollution prevention plan (SPPP) was reviewed and was complete based on the presence of all essential
elements, however, the SPPP will need be revised based on the findings of the site walk-through. A review of analytical
monitoring included one tier 1 response due to 220 mg/L TSS at SDO 2 in 2015. Result from next event was below
benchmark.
The existing site plan does not depict massive rap, shingle, and/or waste piles in the rear of the site. These areas must be
added to the site plan and maintained under the SPPP. One low-lying area was observed acting as an outfall along the
fence line near a shingle pile and is not currently monitored. If not monitored going forward, it may be regraded and
vegetated to promote sheet flow off the property.
Two other sediment basins were observed that appear to discharge and should be added to the SPPP. Division staff
discussed the possibility of representative outfall status (ROS) and explained that the request must be made in writing if .
desired. Only 2 of 4 outfall locations have been properly identified and monitored so far. ROS may be an option otherwise
all outfalls must be monitored going forward. The site appeared reasonably well kept and maintained and was not operating
at the time of inspection.
Page: 2

A
Permit: NCG160053
Owner -Facility: S T Wooten Corporation
Inspection Date: 12/04/2015 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation
Reason for Visit: Routine
Storrnwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Yes No NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
®❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
E❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
N. ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
❑0 ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
®❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
0❑ Q El
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
- .0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
0 ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
E ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
E ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Pany(s)?
E ❑ ❑ El
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
E ❑ ❑ El
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
N❑ Q ❑
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
0❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Site plan is incomplete and only covers a Portion of the site Must revise to include features in
rear of site and all outfall locations.
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
N❑ ❑ El
Comment: Completed for 2 outfalls.
Analytical Monitoring
Yes No NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
El ❑ on
Comment: One tier one response due to 220 mg/L TSS at SDO 2 in 2015
Result from next event was
below benchmark.
Permit and Outfalls
Yes No NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? E ❑ ❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ E ❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? N ❑ ❑ ❑
Comment: Only 2 of 4 outfall locations have been Properly identified and monitored so far. ROS may be an
option otherwise all outfalls must be monitored going forward
Page: 3

-I bo65-3
PonniC ry Owner - Facility: � rt
Inspection Date:, i2f q ( (S Inspection Type: Compiiance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Yews VD
NA NE
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan? li+• ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"?
l3'❑nn
vfo❑❑ J L
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas? yAr 9 g❑ ❑ t'j' "�'{ �''
,-,mac-,
It Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years? 9 ! r ❑ ❑
If Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices? VD n n �� r
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment? �❑ ❑ n
4f Does the Plan include a BMP summary? ` ❑ ❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
ga(o
n n
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
M ❑
❑ ❑
It Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
'-;rQ
❑ ❑
It Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Pady(s)?
0
❑ ❑
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
IO ❑
❑ ❑
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
2'n
n n
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
❑
❑ ❑
Comment:
Qualitative Monitoring
Yes No
NA NE
Dias the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
U ❑
❑ ❑
Comment.
/
Analytical Monitoring tZ0`/ i
Yes No
NA NE
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? ( ��7- r
g❑
❑ ❑
U/S-,
It Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? za'e/fk.
❑ ❑
V ❑
Comment:
Permit and Outfalls
Yes No
NA NE
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
s/-❑
❑ ❑
# Were all outfalis observed during the inspection?
. Vo
❑ ❑
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
110
E�❑
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
V❑
❑ ❑
Comment:
S io 5loll Sw .
Y r° r4c
VoIr Mti
�Y.VI411'711't-y�
4
Vj Ajt_k!
KxO ,

A•k r
NC®ENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Division of Water Quality
Pat McCrory Thomas A. Reeder
Governor Acting Director
June 20, 2013
Jimmy Washburn
P.O. Box 24081
Wilson, NC 27894-2408
Natural Resources
SUBJECT: Compliance Evaluation Inspection
S.T. Wooten Corporation — Sims Facility
NPDES Permit NCG160000
Stormwater Permit CDC NCG160053
Dear Mr. Washburn:
John E. Skvarla, III
On June 13, 2013, Mitch Hayes of the Raleigh Regional Office conducted the subject inspection.
Dwayne Nederhoff s assistance with this inspection was greatly appreciated. Below is a list of findings and
recommendations developed from the inspection:
1. The subject permit was reissued and became effective October 01, 2009 and will expire September
30, 2013. Request for permit renewal is required 180 days prior to permit expiration date.
2. The Sims Facility is a manufacture of asphalt. The facility has two distinct outfalls. Stormwater
Discharge Outfall (SDO) 1 receives flow from the stockpile area and enters a shallow sediment
basin. Stormwaterflows through rip/rap and out to a road ditch. Water in basin SDO 2 receives flow
from the parking lot and loading area. Water in the basin was orange and turbid most likely due to
recent excessive rainfall. Stormwater flows on the pavement and into a shallow basin line with
rip/rap. There was no water present.
3. All elements of the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan are being carried out. Qualitative and
analytical monitoring was last conducted 02.13.2013. Analytical results for the past year have been
within benchmark values.
I would like to thank Mr. Nederhoff for his time and assistance with this inspection. If you have any
questions about this letter or the inspection, please contact me at 919.791.4261 or by email at
mitch.hayesCa�ncdenr.00v
Sincerely,
Mitch Hayes
Environmental Specialist
Cc: RRO permit files, Central files
North Carolina Division or Water Quality 1628 Nlail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27691628 Phone [phone]
Internet: www.ncwaterquulity.org Location: 3800 Barrett Drive Raleigh. NC 27609 Pae [phone]
An Equal OppootuntylAf rmative Action Employer-50% Recycledl 10% Post Consumer Paper
Customer Service
1-877-623-6748
NorthCarolina
,lVatilClll.'1/

r ® •
Compliance Inspection Report
Permit: NCG160053 Effective: 10/O1/09 Expiration: 09/30/14 Owner: S T Wooten Corporation
SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: S T Wooten Corporation- Sims
County: Wilson 6148 Greenpond Rd
Region: Raleigh
Sims NC 27880
Contact Person: Phil Adams Title: Phone: [phone]
Directions to Facility:
System Classifications:
Primary ORC:
Secondary ORC(s):
On -Site Representative(s)
Certification: Phone:
24 hour contact name James Washburn Phone: [phone]
On -site representative Dwayne Nederhoff Phone:
Related Permits:
Inspection Date: 06/1312013 Entry Time: 10:45 AM /Exit Time: 11:30 AM
Primary Inspector: Mitchell S Hayes /*Vc6 eff 7 -f—f p/� Phone: [phone]
Secondary Inspector(s): /
Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
Permit Inspection Type: Asphalt Paving Mixture Stormwater Discharge COC
Facility Status: ■ Compliant ❑ Not Compliant
Question Areas:
0 Storm Water
(See attachment summary)
Page:1

1
Permit: NCG160053 .Owner - Facility: S T Wooten Corporation
Inspection Date: 06/1312013 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine
Inspection Summary
The Sims Facility is a manufacture of asphalt. The facility has two distinct outfalls. Stormwater Discharge Outfall (SDO) 1
receives flow from the stockpile area and enters a shallow sediment basin. Stormwater flows through rip/rap and out to a
road ditch. Water in basin SDO 2 receives flow from the parking lot and loading area. Water in the basin was orange and
turbid most likely due to recent excessive rainfall. Stormwater flows on the pavement and into a shallow basin line with
rip/rap. There was no water present.
All elements of the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan are being carried out. Qualitative and analytical monitoring was
last conducted 02.13.2013. Analytical results for the past year have been within benchmark values.
Page: 2

IF
Permit: NCG160053
Inspection Date: 06/13/2013
0 0
Owner -Facility: S T Wooten Corporation
Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation
--.:._.Stormwater Pollution. Prevention Plan
Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan?
Reason for Visit: Routine
# Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map?
# Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices'?
# Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas?
# Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years?
# Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices?
# Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment?
# Does the Plan include a BMP summary?
# Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)?
# Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan?
# Does the facility provide and document Employee Training?
# Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)?
# Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually?
# Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program?
Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented?
Comment: Employee training was last held 01.10.2013. The SWPPP was last revised
01.05.2013.
Qualitative Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually?
Comment: Monitoring last conducted 02.13.2013.
Analytical Monitoring
Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring?
# Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas?
Comment: Monitoring was last conducted 02.13.2013.
Permit and Outfalls
# Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site?
# Were all outfalls observed during the inspection?
# If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division?
# Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges?
Comment:
Yes
No
NA
NE
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
0
■
❑
❑
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■❑❑❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■❑❑n
■❑❑❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
■
❑
❑
❑
ROOD
i No NA NE
■❑❑❑
Yes No NA NE
❑ ❑ ■ ❑
Yes No NA NE
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
❑❑■❑
■ ❑ ❑ ❑
Page: 3

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan. W. Klimek, P.E., Director
August 15, 2003
Mr. Phil Adams
S T Wooten Asphalt Mixing Services LLC
PO Box 2408
Wilson, North Carolina 27894
A1�
�...- i0
NCuENR
NORTH CAROUNA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Subject: NPDES Permit Modification - Name/Ownership Change
Permit NCG160053
S T Wooten Corp
(Formerly S T Wooten Asphalt Mixing Services LLC)
Wilson County
Dear Mr. Adams:
In accordance with your request received August 8, 2003, the Division is forwarding the subject permit
modification. This modification documents the change in name/ownership at the subject facility. All other terms
and conditions in the original permit remain unchanged and in full effect. This permit modification is issued under
the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between
North Carolina and the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency dated December 6, 1983.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit modification are
unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days
following receipt of this letter. This request must be a written petition conforming to Chapter 150E of the North
Carolina General Statutes, filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh,
North Carolina 27699-6714. Unless such demand is made, this decision shall be final and binding.
This permit does not affect the legal requirement to obtain other permits which may be required by the
Division of Water Quality, the Division of Land Resources, Coastal Area Management Act, or any other Federal or
Local government permit that may be required. If you have any questions concerning this permit; please contact
Valery Stephens at the telephone number or address listed below. /'
Sincerely,
cc: Central Files .
Raleigh Regional Office, Water Quality Section
NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617
V
/
l�AIan W. Klimek, P.E.
919 733-5083, extension 520 (fax) 919 733-0719
VIS11 US ON THE INTERNET @ http://h2o.enr,state.nc.us/ [e-mail]

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG160000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG160053
STORMWATER DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful
standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
S T Wooten Corporation
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at
S T Wooten Asphalt Mixing Services LLC - Sims
6148 Greenpond Road
Sims
Wilson County
to receiving waters designated as Millston Creek, a class C NSW water in the Neuse River
Basin in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other
conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III, IV, V, and VI of General Permit No. NCG160000 as
attached.
This certificate of coverage shall become effective August 15, 2003.
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this day August 15, 2003.
Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

-t>
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
PHIL ADAMS
S.T. WOOTEN- SIMS
P.O. BOX 2408
WILSON. NC 27894
1�
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
July 27,1999
Subject: Reissue - NPDES Stormwater Permit
S.T. Wooten- Sims
COC Number NCG 160053
Dear Permittee: Wilson County
In response to your renewal application for continued coverage under general permit NCG160000, the Division of
Water Quality (DWQ) is forwarding herewith the reissued stormwater general permit. This permit is reissued
pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement
between the state of North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, dated December 6, 1983.
The following information is included with your permit package:
* A copy of general stormwater permit NCG160000
* A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP) Certification Form. Completion of this form is required to
certify that you have developed and implemented the SPPP as per the conditions of the permit. This form
must be completed and returned to the Division within 30 days of receipt of this letter.
DO NOT SEND the SPPP with the signed form.
* Five copies of the Analytical Monitoring form and five copies of the Qualitative Monitoring form
* A copy of a Technical Bulletin for the general permit which outlines changes in the permit, key requirements,
and addresses frequently asked questions
* A Certificate of Coverage
Your coverage under this general permit is not transferable except after notice to DWQ. The Division may require
modification or revocation and reissuance of the Certificate of Coverage. This permit does not affect the legal
requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by DENR or relieve the permittee from responsibility
for compliance with any other applicable federal, state, or local law, rule, standard, ordinance, order, judgment, or
decree.
If you have any questions regarding this permit package please contact Aisha Lau of the Central Office Stormwater
and General Permits Unit at [phone], ext. 578
Sincerely.
/,J/I,.A-ejle /
for Kerr T. Stevens
cc: Central Files
Stormwater and General permits Unit Files
Raleigh Regional Office
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1617 Telephone [phone] Fax [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 10% post -consumer paper

a
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG160000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG160053
STORMWATER DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
S.T. WOOTEN- SIMS
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at
S.T. WOOTEN- SIMS
6148 GREENPOND RD.
SIMS
WILSON COUNTY
to receiving waters designated as Millstone Creek in the Neuse River Basin
in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, II. III,
IV, V. and VI of General Permit No. NCG160000 as attached.
This certificate of coverage shall become effective August 1, 1999,
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this day July 27. 1999,
for Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

yState of North Carolina
Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
Division of Environmental Management
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Jonathan B. Howes, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director
April7, 1995
George Strickland
S.T. Wooten Corp. -Sims
P.O. Box 2408
Wilson, NC 27894
A,&aI4Jp'6A
IDEHNR
Subject: General Permit No. NCG160000
S.T. Wooten Corp. -Sims
COC NCG160053
Wilson County
Dear George Strickland
In accordance with your application for discharge permit received on January 25, 1995, we are
forwarding herewith the subject certificate of coverage to discharge under the subject state - NPDES general
permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215 .1 and
the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the US Environmental Protection agency dated
December 6, 1983.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are
unacceptable to you, you have the right to request an individual permit by submitting an individual permit
application. Unless such demand is made, this certificate of coverage shall be final and binding.
Please take notice that this certificate of coverage is not transferable except after notice to the Division
of Environmental Management. The Division of Environmental Management may require modification or
revocation and reissuance of the certificate of coverage.
This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the
Division of Environmental Management or permits required by the Division of Land Resources, Coastal
Area Management Act or any other Federal or Local governmental permit that may be required.
If you have any question concerning this permit, please contact MS. AISHA LAU at telephone number
919/733-5083.
Sincerely,
A. Preston Howard, Jr. P.E.
cc: -Raleigh Regional Office_'
P.O. Box 29535, Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0535 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/ 101. post -consumer paper

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, HEALTH, AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
GENERAL PERMIT NO, NCG160000
CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG160053
STORMWATER DISCHARGES
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and
regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended
S.T. Wooten Corporation
is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater from a facility located at
S.T. Wooten Corporation Sims Asphalt Plant
6148 Green Pond Road
Sims
Wilson County
to receiving waters designated as Millstone Creek in the Neuse River Basin
in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I,11, III
and IV of General Permit No. NCGI60000 as attached.
This Certificate of Coverage shall become effective April 7, 1995.
This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit.
Signed this day April 7, 1995.
A. Preston Howard Jr., P.E„ Director
Division of Environmental Management
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

i. • I U••••Cb . •.. �•a�`.
M
/ n 11 1 � L• 1x -209
ce'm C
C m" ;7 •
1960Dn
94
,
uni
2.
• ��=in I / � till _ / .���` J
�•
700
sinliL
n :II
U100 -1"� •i - •ol
I26
G a[4 n
0
11151 'r07?
�I�\
fi3 2270000 FEET 5' '64 '65 I W55IA/ NEf N'67 2'30' '68
b356
SCALE 1:24000
* 1 2 0 1 MILE
CM
1000 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 FEET
IlI 1 .5 0 1 KILOMETER
11.43' CONTOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET
31 MILS NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929 f
f
781 MAGNETIC NORTH
CENTER OF SHEET 0
012 and wnndlznd rmmmilml in THIS MAP COMPLIES WITH NATIONAL MAP ACCURACY STANDARDS