NCG020166_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20100408

PERMIT NO.
DOC TYPE
DOC DATE
STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET
NCG PERMITS
/V CCU aj6�(o�P
HISTORICAL FILE
❑ MONITORING REPORTS
❑Flo
YYYYMMDD

Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
T e c h n i c a I M e m o r a n d u m
Date: April 6, 2010
Project: Martin Marietta Materials
Rocky Point Quarry
Rocky Point, Pcndcr County, NC
Subject: 2009 Annual Summary of Hydrologic Monitoring;
Introduction
Hydrologic monitoring at the Martin Marietta Materials (MMM) Rocky Point Quarry in Pender County,
North Carolina has continued through 2009 with the on -going mining activities. The following
memorandum presents an annual summary of the monitoring data in compliance with the site's National
Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and approved Modified Pumping Plan. The
monitoring plan was modified in late 2008 and MMM met with North Carolina Division of Water Quality
(NCDWQ) staff in May 2009 to discuss the monitoring plan in relation to the mine development.
Subsequent to the May meeting, MMM requested a reduction in the monitoring plan to focus monitoring
efforts south of the active mine and remove monitoring gages east of the mine since that portion of the
site would be abandoned and allowed to recharge. In their letter dated November 24, 2009, NCDWQ
approved a portion of the request, allowing for the removal of the monitoring gage at Location 14 (i.e.
monitoring at Location 14 would change from daily monitoring to annual inspection). Monitoring at
Locations 3, 7, and 8 would be reduced from daily data collection to monthly data collection. NCDWQ
staff (Linda Willis) reviewed the site with MMM and Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (KHA) as part of
the annual inspection included in this report on February 18, 2010.
Background
The initial monitoring program consisted of nine locations east of the mine and included water level
monitoring of shallow water tablclwetland hydrology, overburden/surficial aquifer hydrology, deeper
aquifer groundwater, and surface water (outfalls) (Figure 1). The monitoring program was expanded in
2004 to implement the Modified Pumping Plan, and included additional monitoring locations (# 10419)
east and south of the mine (Figure 2) for mine expansion east into Tracts G1 and G2. The monitoring

J

program was modified again in 2005 to include additional locations south of Tract E in conjunction with
southward mine expansion into that tract (Figure 3).
Locations 1, 4, and 9 were removed as a result of the eastward mine expansion in 2004 (Tracts GI and
G2). Location 12 was removed by timber management activities in 2006.
In October 2008, the monitoring data was summarized and presented to NCDWQ per their request in
response to MMM's request to amend the monitoring program. Figure 4 shows the locations monitored
at that time (Locations 1 through 26, excluding 1, 4, 7, 9, and 12), consisting of thirty total monitoring
gages (five overburden/surficial gages, six deeper aquifer groundwater gages, three surface water gages,
and 16 shallow water table/wetland gages).
In November and December 2008, the Monitoring Program was modified per MMM's recommendations
with the approval of NCDWQ. Figure 5 presents the location of daily data logger gages and other
locations that will be visually inspected with manual water table measurements on an annual basis.
Monitoring in 2009 continued at the monitoring locations shown in Figure 5. However, in 2010, the
monitoring plan will be modified per the approved changes (i.e. Location 14 will become a manual
observation and inspection location, and Locations 3, 7, and 8 will become monthly measurement
locations).
The 2009 data for the daily monitoring gages is attached as Appendix A, and annual site inspection
photographs and notes from all monitoring locations in attached as Appendix B.
Summary of Monitoring Locations
The following is a summary of changes by monitoring location.
• Location 1 — Previously removed from mine expansion
• Location 2 — Annual inspection
• Location 3 —Daily shallow water table gage (NW 17) monitoring. The surface water gage (NW8)
was removed due to repeated failure of the datalogger unit. To be monitored monthly in 2010.
• Location 4 — Previously removed for mine expansion
• Location 5 — Daily shallow water table gage (CE5) monitoring.
• Location 6 — Annual inspection
2

• Location 7 - Daily shallow water table gage (NW15) monitoring. To be monitored monthly in
2010.
• Location 8 - Daily shallow water table gage (CE4) monitoring. To be monitored monthly in
2010.
• Location 9 - Previously removed for mine expansion
• Location 10 - Annual inspection
• Location I l - Annual inspection
• Location 12 - Previously removed from silviculture activity
• Location 13 - Annual inspection
• Location 14 - Daily shallow water table gage (CEC3) monitoring. Gage will be removed in 2010
and will transition to annual inspection.
• Location 15 - Annual inspection
• Location 16 - Annual inspection
• Location 17 - Annual inspection
• Location 18 - Annual inspection
• Location l9 - Daily surface water gage (N W I) monitoring
• Locations 20 - Daily shallow water table gage (NW4) monitoring
• Locations 21 - Daily shallow water table gage (NW12) monitoring
• Locations 22 - Daily shallow water table gage (NW2) monitoring
• Location 23 - Replaced Deep Groundwater gage NW24 with gage NW26 in February 2009.
Continued daily Overburden water level (NW19) and Deep Groundwater water level (NW26)
monitoring
• Location 24 - Daily Overburden water level (MM5) and Deep Groundwater water level (MM4)
monitoring
• Location 25 - Daily Overburden water level (NW22) and Deep Groundwater water level (NW23)
monitoring; daily surface water level (NW 10) monitoring in the adjacent ditch
• Location 26 - Daily Deep Groundwater water level (MM6) monitoring
The changes at the monitoring locations include the removal of the surface water level monitoring
gage at Location 3, and the replacement of the Deep Groundwater monitoring gage at Location 23. In
2010 the monitoring gage at Location 14 will be removed, and the monitoring at locations 3, 7, and 8
will be reduced from daily to monthly measurements.
3

J

Figure 1: Initial Rocky Point Quarry Monitoring Program in 2002
4

Figure Z: Rocky Point Quarry Monitoring Program per the Modified P nrpirtti Plan, 2004
5
Is

i
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Figure 3: Additional Monitoring Locations to Modified Pumping Plan for Southern Expansion, 2005

Figure 4: Rocky Point Quarry Modified Pumping Plan Monitoring locations, October 2008

J

roe
Figure 5: Rocky Point Quarry Modified Pumping Plan Monitoring Locations, Amended November and December 2008
Is

2009 Data Summary
The monitoring data collected for 2009 is attached as Appendix A and site photographs and observations
are included in Appendix B. An important note in evaluation of the monitoring data is that the region
suffered a significant drought in 2007-2008. Figure 6 shows the magnitude of the drought severity for
this period which likely had significant influence on the early portion of 2009.
Figure 6: North Carolina Drought Severity since 1895
NC Statewide Average Drought Indicators
PDSi PhD] SP13 —SP16 —AYG of Indicators
4
I son I
Is
V
oz
W
2
Q 1
W
0
M
'a
N
L
O 2
n
-3
-4 in MEN
'+ %
7K4 1WO �µL�+O µO µp ZP ON ON
0 O 'D O O
Vn a V1 O V1 O tJO O O LA l![] X
O ln
Year
V��
II��I
��
�;
■Iirl
Source: North Carolina State Climate Office, 2008 (htip://www.nc-climate.tiesu.edu/climate/d`rozight.php)
Figure 7 shows a summary of drought conditions and departures for normal for precipitation and rainfall
in North Carolina between late 2008 to October 2009. This figure shows that rainfall was still below
normal for the southeast region of the state including the Rocky Point Quarry site.
9

Figure 7: Climate Departures from Normal in North Carolina
Temperature are Precipitation by climate c:visivn
Departures from Normal for 14ovember IOU - October;009
based on orelrminary (tare
+0.19F -0.12F
+3.171n (106%) •5,01in (69%) -G.13F
-3.701n 192
-0.32F
+0.14F +0.39in (101%)
+5.1Bin (11V.4) -0-0.18F
n (9 -5 991n (88roi
North Carolina Statewide Average -0.12F
O"r-ires from kurnw6
fo, kuvembe- 2003 - oLlober 2". -4A51n (91 %)
Tempef.nure: -0.13F
PnKipilmion: •1 "in (9107)
State Climate Office of NC
Source: North Carolina State Climate Ojjice, 2009 (http://www.ncdrought.org/documents/2009_annual_report.pdfj
However, rainfall conditions improved in late 2009, and the state received enough rainfall so that all
counties in the state were considered normal in December 2009 (North Carolina Drought Management
Advisory Council; Annual Report — 2009). This recharge and increased rainfall was observed in the
monitoring data collected at the Rocky Point Quarry.
Eastern Tracts
Location 2
Location 2 continues to be maintained by the water control structure and is inundated. Photograph 10
Appendix B shows the maintained ponded area.
Location 3
The surface water gage (NW8) had repeatedly failed and needed to be removed. However, from
observation of the shallow water table monitoring gage (NW17), surface water has been sustained at this
location by mine dewatering discharge and the Modified Pumping Plan for the quarry, and the drainage
swale at this location has been maintained as hydrated. From visual observation, the primary flow
channel has developed into more of a defined stream, and the elevation of the channel bottom is
approximately one foot lower than the ground surface at the shallow water table gage. Therefore, this
area likely had sustained surface flow throughout the entire year. Water table level has also been

J

sustained within the upper 12 inches of the soil throughout the year. Photographs 1 and 2 in Appendix B
show the site conditions at this location.
Location 5
The shallow water table gage was replaced again in February 2009. The data collected in 2009 shows
that this wetland area was maintained hydrologically with the water table dropping below the upper 12
inches of the soil for only brief periods during the growing season. Otherwise, the water level was within
the upper surface, or ponded just above the surface throughout the year. In the later portion of 2009 the
area stayed inundated with higher rainfall in the fall and the beginning of the dormant season in
November. The sustained water level observed here shows that the water control structure and Modified
Pumping Plan has been effective in maintaining wetland hydrology in the G 1 tract closest to the mine.
Photographs 3 and 4 in Appendix B shows the vegetation community and site conditions at this location.
Location 6
The monitoring location was inspected in February 2010 and it was noted that water table was visible at
the ground surface and there had been no change to the vegetation community. Photographs 5 and 6 in
Appendix B shows the vegetation community and site conditions at this location.
Location 7
The shallow water table monitoring gage (NW15) shows that the wet flat wetland area cast of the mine
demonstrated appropriate hydrologic function for this wetland type. The water table was at, or ponded
just above the ground surface for most of the monitoring period. The exception was during July and
August at the peak of the growing season. As expected, water table in this area was below the upper
surface (i.e. upper 12 inches of the soil surface) when evapotranspiration withdrawal is at its highest
levels. In the fall, with significant rainfall and decreasing; evapotranspiration demand, the water table
recharged back to the ground surface. Photographs 7 and $ in Appendix B show the site conditions at
this location.
Location 8
The shallow water table gage (NW5) shows that the water level has been maintained above the ground
surface and that the Strawberry Branch floodpiairdswamp was inundated throughout most of the year.
The exception was the period of June through August where the water table levels were lower (below the
ground surface), but still was sustained in the upper surface (i.e_ upper 12 inches of the soil surface).
Photograph 9 in Appendix B show the site conditions at this location.

Location 10
The monitoring location was inspected in February 2010 and it was noted that surface water levels at this
location had been maintained since last year. The hydrologic monitoring data in Location 5 (CE5)
demonstrates that this area has been maintained by the water control structure and water management
from dewatering. Photograph 10 in Appendix B shows the vegetation community and site conditions at
this location.
Location 1 l
The monitoring location was inspected in February 2010 and it was noted that water table level at this
location was approximately one foot below the ground surface. This is consistent with previous years
monitoring data. During the site inspection in February 2010, it was noted that there appears to be more
Giant Cane (arundinaria gigantea) indicating that the vegetation community at this location may be
trending towards a wetter community. Photographs I I and 12 in Appendix B show the vegetation
community and site conditions at this location.
Location 13
The monitoring location was inspected in February 2010 and it was noted that the location, a depression,
had ponded water surrounding the remaining monitoring well. Surface water at the location was observed
to be approximately one foot deep. This area was observed to be significantly wetter than previous years,
although there was no observed change in the vegetation community. Photograph 13 in Appendix B
shows the vegetation community and site conditions at this location.
Location 14
The shallow water table gage (CEC3) recorded readings at the bottom of the well throughout most of the
year indicating that water table never reached the upper three feet of the soil surface, or that the unit was
collecting; inaccurate readings. Late in the year the gage did record water table readings, which does
coincide with the general recharge observed in other gages, however, with the difficulty in maintaining
this unit, it is unlikely that the data from this unit may be relied upon. In addition, evidence of a bear
damaging (chewing on the plastic tubing) the unit was noted in the fall of 2009. Water table was noted
to be approximately 2.5 feet below the soil surface at the time of the site inspection in February 2010.
Photographs 14 and 15 in Appendix B show the site conditions at this location.
Locations B, 16, and 17
12

These locations were transitioncd to annual inspection locations, however the site conditions are all
similar to Location 7, and all locations are within a large contiguous wetland. The monitoring locations
were inspected in February 2010 and water was ponded three inches above the surface at locations 15 and
16. At Location 17 the water table was observed to be at the surface. Visual observation of these
locations indicates that water table and hydrologic indicators are similar to monitoring Location 7. Also,
there was no noticeable change to the wetland community or vegetation. Photographs 16 through 20 in
Appendix B show the vegetation community and site conditions at these locations.
Location 18
The monitoring location was inspected in February 2010 and it was noted that water table was
approximately 10 inches below the ground surface_ However, there were no significant indicators that the
area surrounding the well had been ponded (i.e. no stained leaves or water marks). This area was
observed to be significantly wetter than previous years, although there was no observed change in the
vegetation community. Photograph 21 in Appendix B shows the vegetation community and site
conditions at this location.
Southern Trucfs
Location 19
The surface water gage (NW 1) shows that surface water has been sustained in the drainage feature/ditch
throughout the monitoring period. The data shows that although mining activities have continued to
expand in Tract E, base flow in the ditch has continued and higher flows associated with rainfall events
arc evident. Photographs 22 and 23 in Appendix B show the site conditions at this location.
Locations 20, 21, and 22
Locations 20, 21, and 22 are located along the wetland boundary of the "Oxbow wetland" feature south of
Tract E. Locations 20 and 21 demonstrate wetland hydrology with sustained water table levels in the
upper surface for extended periods between May -June and September -October. Location 22 is slightly
higher in elevation than the other two gages and demonstrates that the area is hydrated near the surface,
but does not meet minimum wetland hydrology criteria of a sustained water table in the upper twelve
inches. The closest the location comes to meeting hydrology criteria is during a 6-day period (5/17/2010-
5/2212010) followed by a 7-day period three days later (5/22/2010-6/1/2010). The gage at location 22
responds similarly to the other two gages within the oxbow feature, showing that the larger wetland area
demonstrates hydrologic functions; however, Location 22 is closer to the wetland boundary and marginal
13

edge of wetland hydrologic functions. Photographs 24 through 28 in Appendix B show the site
conditions at these locations.
Locations 23 and 25
The overburden gages for Locations 23 and 25 (NW 19 and NW22 respectively) are located near the
drainage Swale south of Tract E. This swale receives mine dewatering discharge, and the water levels
within the overburden reflect the hydrologic connection to the Swale. A surface water gage (N W 10) was
installed at Location 25 in November 2008 to evaluate groundwater levels in relation to water level in the
Swale. Both overburden gages along the swale adjacent to Locations 23 and 25 show that the wetland
system has been hydrated in the upper surface throughout 2009. Likewise, the stream gage at Location 25
shows that the drainage swale was hydrated throughout the year with water levels between I to 2.5 feel
from the bottom of the ditch. Also, the overburden gages show fluctuating water levels that do not appear
to be correlated to the deeper groundwater levels which may indicate that there is an effective subsurface
impermeable clay layer. However, overburden and deeper groundwater water levels showed a recharge
trend in 2009 even with the advancement of the pit in that general direction. Photographs 29 through 32
in Appendix B show the site conditions at these locations.
Locations 24 and 26
The overburden gage at Location 24 (MM5) shows a water level response to rainfall events and slight
rising -lowering trends associated with the growing season. The deeper aquifer gages at Locations 24 and
26 (MM4 and MM6 respectively) show a recharging water level in the lower aquifer throughout the
monitoring period. Photograph 33 in Appendix B shows the site conditions at Location 26.
Conclusions
As was the case in 2008, the monitoring program at Rocky Point has continued to show in 2009 that
water management under the Modified Pumping Plan is effective in maintaining hydration to wetlands
and/or stream systems adjacent to the mine, and that dewatcring activities have not had an adverse affect
to the hydrology on these systems.
In 2009, the hydrologic data does show that the project area generally recharged in 2009 as the area
recovered from previous drought with more normal rainfall.
Tables 1, 2, and 3 below provide summaries for each monitoring gage and location.
14

In 2010, Martin Marietta Materials will be completing construction of the interior haul road that will
allow for the northern portion of the pit area to be reclaimed and allowed to recharge. As this recharge
occurs, it is anticipated that areas cast of the mine will no longer need to be monitored for potential
dewatering influence. These areas have been demonstrated to be hydrologically sustained and not
affected by the mining activity when the mine was closer to this portion of the site. Now, as the mine
moves southward and away from the eastern wetlands, and the pit is abandoned and allowed to recharge,
MMM requests that the monitoring program be reduced to focus data collection efforts along the southern
portion of the property. The perimeter recharge trench adjacent to the eastern tracts will continue to
receive dewatering discharge under the Modified Pumping Plan, and the monitoring gage at Location 5
will continue to document that this area is hydrated and that the discharge is being maintained. Therefore,
Location 5 monitoring gage is proposed to remain in place to document appropriate water management
and discharge, however, the remaining gages (Locations 3, 7, and 8) should be removed and these
locations transitioned to visual inspection and annual monitoring.
15

Table l: 2009 Summary for Shallow Water Table Monitoring Gages
r
�Ga
Shallow Watei Table MonitorinE
Gage ID or
Meets Minimum
Percent of Growing
Tract
Location
Annual
Type
Criteria
Season (°/.)
Notes
Inspection
G1
5
CE5
Shallow
Yes
> 12.5
Water level is within the upper 12 inches for most of the monitoring period except for brief
periods (1-2 days) in April, July, and September.
G1
10
Annual
Visual
Water control structure maintained, and dewatering discharge has been sustained. Area is
still ponded and there is no visual change from previous years"
There is no visual change from previous years, however there may be more dominance of
G1
11
Annual
Visual
Giant Cane (arundinaria gigantea) indicating that the site may be wetter with more normal
rainfall than previous drought years.
H1
3
NW 17
Shallow
Yes
> 12"5
Water table is above, or just within a few inches of the ground surface throughout the
Monitoring eriod,
H1
6
Annual
Visual
No change observed at location compared to previous years" Water table was observed at
the ground surface during inspection.
_
No change observed at location compared to previous years" Location is in a shallow
H1
13
Annual
Visual
depression feature which had ponded around the remaining well casing. This was observed
to be considerable more wet than previous years.
The gage shows to be dry throughout most of the monitoring year except for a period of
H1
14
CEC3
Shallow
No
recharge in December where the water table is recorded in the upper surface. Historically this
area has shown to not meet wetland hydrology criteria and the gage has had recurring
maintenance issues. Gage is to be removed and transition to visual inspection in 2010.
H1
Is
Annual
Visual
No change observed at location compared to previous years. Water table was observed at 10
inches from the ground surface during inspection"
H2
7
NW 15
Shallow
Yes
>12.5
Water table level is sustained at or above the ground surface for the year except for July and
parts of August.
15 1 S
Locations 15, 16, and 17 all showed no change in vegetation community or to the ground
H2
17
Annual
Visual
surface Ci.e" no subsidence or sinkhole development). Water table levels were at or above the
ground surface at all locations during the inspection,
Location is within Strawberry Branch floodplain (swamp), North of Tract H2, and is inundated
Other
8
CE4
Shallow
Yes
> 12.5
during the spring and fall, with water table level within the upper 12 inches of the ground
surface during the summer months.
Gage showed multiple periods meeting or exceeding hydrology criteria (consecutive days of
South
20
NW 4
Shallow
Yes
> 12"5
water table level in the upper 12 inches during the growing season)" The longest of which
occurred in September/October.
Similar to Location 20, the gage showed multiple periods meeting or exceeding hydrology
South
21
MMA3
Shallow
Yes
> 12.5
criteria (consecutive days of water table level in the upper 12 inches during the growing
season). The Ion est of which occurred in September/October.
Hydrology responded similarly to Locations 20 and 21; however the location did not sustain a
South
22
MMA2
Shallow
No
< 5
water table level in the upper surface sufficient to meet wetland hydrology criteria" Elevation at
this location is slightly higher and likel represents the edge of the wetland boundary.
South
19
NW 1
Surface
NA
NA
Water level in the drainage ditch in the southern portion of Tract E has continued to be
Water
hydrated with water levels varying between 0.5 and 2.0 feet from the ditch bottom.
- Minimum Wetland Criteria is defined by the Army Corps of Engineers as the upper 12 inches of soil must be saturated for 5% of the growing season (12 days)
" - Pender County growing season ranges from March 17 through November 15 (242 days) and is defined by NRCS as temperatures 28OF or higher with a 50% probability
16

Table 2: 2009 Summary Table for Deeper Groundwater and Overburden Monitoring Gages
..1-
Tract
Location
Ga a ID
Type
Notes
South
23
NW 19
Overburden
Drainage swaie area adjacent to gage is hydrated with water levels fluctuating relative to rainfall events, and appears to be on a rechargin
trend late in 2009 into 2010.
South
23
NW26
Deep
Groundwater level shows a recharging trend through the monitoring year.
South
24
MM5
Overburden
Surficial water levels maintained between 6 and 2 feet from surface and correlated with NW 19, fluctuating with growing season and
rainfall events.
South
24
MM4
Deep
Groundwater level shows a recharging trend similar to !NW26.
South
25
NW22 i
Overburden
Drainage $wale area adjacent to gage is hydrated with water levels fluctuating relative to growing season and rainfall events_
Periodic drawdown events seen in the previous year were not as frequent or pronounced in 2009 under more normal rainfall conditions.
South
25
NW23
Deep
These water level fluctuations were not observed in the overburden gage, and the water level of the adjacent ditch was maintained
throughout the year. Groundwater levels also show a general recharging trend in 2009.
South
25
NW 110
Surface water
Base flow water level of approximately 1 foot of water from the ditch bottom was maintained throughout the monitoring period with water
level
level rise associated with rainfall events as high as another 1.5 feet.
South
26
MM6
Deep
Groundwater level fluctuations observed in 2006 were not seen in 2009 with more normal rainfall conditions. The gage showed a
general recharging trend in 2009.
Table 3: 2009 Summary Table for Surface Water Monitoring Gages
Suifac6 Water Level Monitorin g Gages
Gage
Tract
Location
ID
-Type
Notes
Water level in the drainage ditch in the southern portion of Tract E has continued to be hydrated with water levels varying between 0.5 and 2.0 feet from the
E
19
NW 1
Surface
ditch bottom.
South
25
NWiO
Surface
Base flow water level of approximately 1 foot of water from the ditch bottom was maintained throughout the monitoring period with water level rise
associated with rainfall events as high as another 1.5 feet
17

Appendix A
2009 Hydrologic Monitoring Data

Rocky Point Quarry
Moran Marki"a Materials
-y ` Hydrologic Monitoring
Location 3 - Surface Water Level Gage (NW8)
January
1. 2009 - December 31, 2009
Water Level -Ground Surface • Rainfall
18.00 +� —
-+ ---
I — M• -
0.00
Il
I i
1.00
2.00
I
3.00
I
4.00
�
rn
16,00
5.00
0
6.00
y
l6
a7
Y
a>
7.00
8.00
is
o
Gage failed and was removed.
Refer to Shallow Monitoring Gage
9.00
cv
>
(NW17) to observe periods of
a)
w
14.00
inundation at Location 3.
11.00
11.00
12.00
12•09
13.00
i
14.00
12.00
15.00
rn
a o
rn rn Cn 0)
o O O O O
M
o
O N
cn cD c7 �- ao
N N N N
cn
O O
CN Cn T) GD
O O O O O
O
Date
areparEd By Chad Erenhouse
Date. 41612010 � � I , W-d*=NxftKVC

•�������tt�t�t�t�����������t��������t����t�•

Rocky Point Quarry
Martin UmwieUa MMerWs / \/ 4 w Hydrologic Monitoring
Location 3 - Shallow Water Table Gage (NW17)
Janoary 1. 2009 - December 31, 2009
Water Level T Ground Surface f USACE Wetland Criteria t Monitoring Depth ♦ Rainfall l
0.00
15.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
13.00
4.00
J
vy
2.
8
i
5.00
ar
>
O
_
6.00 v+
—
--
t
--
—
--
--
--
--
—
--
—
--
—
—
7.00 v
11.00
8.00
s=
�
0
9.00
a�
10.00
LU
OII''V I
E
5
9.40
Aarch
17
1)
Novemberl1
11.00
12.00
I
�
13.00
I
14.00
I
15.00
TOO
rn rn rn rn CY) Cr) 03 rn a)
O O O C7 O O O O O O O O O O
r a) CD CD C'7 r aO CD C_rJ O a0 lD M
O N (14 N CV N r �_ O O
N M V tfJ CD f� CO a'i C) CV N
O O O O O O O O O O r r r r
Date
Prepared By: Chad Evenho se =^ R
Date: 47612010 I ,

Rocky Point Quarry
Martin Marlette Materials ^^ Hydrologic Monitoring
19.00
J
17.00
m
0
M
M
d
aD
u-
Location 5 - Shallow Water Table Gage (CE5)
January 1, 2009 - December 31, 2009
Water r Level tGround Surface --*—USACE Wetland Criteria Monitoring Depth Rainfall
FT171"TFI-11
Gage KHA2 was replaced with
gage CE5 in February 2009.
13.00 1 I
rn
O
O
O
oa=oQxaoz=c
R I GS 3 N
lai ch 1 T to IN o e b r 5
M M
rn
rn
rn
rn
rn
M
rn
a O
o
0
o
O
o
o
O o
CY) ((D
(fl
M
00
(0
M
O 00
N N
CV
N
N
r'
!Z
•"
— O
N
C7
4
LO
(0
ti
00
M O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Date
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4,00
5.00
6.00
t
7.00 c
8.00
9.00 .�
10.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
15.00
rn M
l)
o O
o
LO M
r
O O
Q
N
N
� r
T
Prepared By Chad Evenhouse ^
Cate, 41612010 CE ,

/� Rocky Point Quarry
Ma.b- Ma.ietta Msleri.h / \/
V ` Hydrologic Monitoring
Location 7 - Shallow Water Table Gage (NW15)
January 1, 2009 - December 31, 2009
Water Level --W-Ground Surface 0 USACE Wetland Criteria f Monitoring Depth • Rainfall
0.00
22.00
l
1.00
2.00
3.00
07
_ 2000 IN
4.00
J
g
5.00
-I-
0
6.00 N
«.
7.00
18.00
G
WIIN
E
ti
M
r
h
7
to
NOV
8.00 m
o
9.00
>
17.14
10.00
w
11.00
16.00
Gage NW9 was replaced with
gage NC15 in January 2009.
12.00
13.00
14,00
15.00
14.00
rn a� o rn rn rn rn rn rn
0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
rn cD (0 ao cc ci o OD
O N N N N CV f f y- - o
N m V Lf CO i-- Go 6) o r CV N
o O O o 0 0 o (n O o '-
Date
Prepared By. Chad Everhouse
Date .41&2010 ��� dA�drga+c

Rocky Point Quarry
" emn Marietta Hydrologic Monitoring
Location 8 - Shallow Water Table Gage (CE4)
January 1. 2009 - December 31, 2009
Water Level —&-Ground Surface f USACE Wetland Criteria - Monitoring Depth • Rainfall
8.00 0.00
1.00
2.00
3,00
6.00
4.00
-j
.4
5.00
v
0
6.00 N
M
s
w7.00
� 4.00
_
8.00
c
0
9.00
M
y
Q7
10.00
w
2.00
I
11.00
Gage KHA1 was replaced with
I
S
SON
gage CE4 in January 2009.
March1
to
I'loveribar
15
12,00
13.00
14.00
15.00
0.00
rn M rn M M M M 0 M M CD rn M rn
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
M Lo cp i*) 0 cD c i O O �?5 r
O N N N CN N — O O O C''J
r^ N co V ai CD I` ai O N N
CD CD CD CD CD CD O O O O r
Date
Prepared By Chad Evenhouse
Date. 4/&2010 E z ! . K

23.00
21.00
c
0
m
W 17.00
Rocky Point Quarry
Hydrologic Monitoring
Location 14 - Shallow Water Table Gage {CEC3)
January 1, 2009 - December 31. 2009
Water Level -0-- Ground Surface f USACE Wetland Criteria t Monitoring Depth • Rainfall
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
I
4.00
i
i
5.00
I
6.00
9 01 I I L
7.00 t
8.00
-- - - -- -- - -- - - -- - t -- 9.00
O N N 33, SE kSlOP 1 10.00 W
rc 7 o 90vernbet 1
11.00
12.00
6. 37 13.00
14.00
15.00
15.00
0 0
o
a
0)
o
M
0
o
cr)
a
Cr3
o
CD
0
0)
0
cr) m
a o 0
m
O (V
Cp
N
cD
N
M
tV
N
00
CO
ch
O
00
O
u"� ch
O O M
c=- -
N
CO
"r
if)
t0
�+
ap
a)
O
N N
0 0
0
o
a
o
a
o
0
0
r r •-
Date
Prepared By. Chad Evenhouse �n
Date. 4W2010 �Z, ` = W-

Mena„ U1110*114" "M
v�
h. A6111]
J
w
O
M
M 20.00
�r
a
LL
18.00
Rocky Point Quarry
Hydrologic Monitoring
Location 19 - Surface Water Level Gage (NW1)
January 1, 2009 - December 31, 2009
Water Level Ditch Bottom • Rainfall
0.00
Ir
1.00
2.00
IN
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
.c
TOOc
8.00
w
9.00
10.00
11,00
12.00
13.00
Elevation of
bottom of the ditch
is 17.26'.
14.00
16.00 15.00
0 0 0 0 © o 0 0 0 0
aD cD co M ao co M a
O N N N
N M
p O O O O Q (D O C7 O
Date
Prepared By Chad Evenhouse
Dale. 41612010
M 0)
rn
o O
o
0
00 In
M
r
O Q
O
M
O
N
N
cEn ft

9.00
700
c
0
w
0 3.00
w
Rocky Point Quarry
Hydrologic Monitoring
Location 20 - Shallow Water Table Gage (NW4)
January 1. 2009 - December 31, 2009
' Water Level --a— Ground Surface -} USACE Wetland Criteria } Monitoring Depth • Rainfatl
0.00
1
1.00
2.00
3.00
2
4.00
5.00
—
—
—
—
—
—
--
+
--
—
--
6,00 in
�
a
s
7.00
8.00
w
9.00 'm
tY
G
WIN
3
SE
10.00
M
r
h
7toN
v
m
Ap
11.00
8$
12.00
Gage MMA5 was replaced with
gage NW4 in January 2009.
13.00
14.00
G
p
o_
o
0
0
o
a
CO
N
N
(V
CCV
N
�_
r
N
M
IT
�
O
Q
O
O
O
C>
O O
Date
0
0
o
0
0
_0
O
r
O
O
O
M
CO
0)
O
r
N
N
C7
Q
r-
Prepared By. Chad Evenhovse Dale 41612010 Con IFyn, �lesK

11.00
J
07.00
m
U-
r-
0
0)5.00
W
Location 21 - Shallow Water Table Gage (NW12)
January 1. 2009 - December 31. 2009
Gage IVIMA3 was replaced with
gage NW12 in January 2009.
O_O
r
CA
(p
Cr5
r
co
fD
M O
N
M
Ln
i0
ti
00 m
O
O
O
O
Q
O
O
O
Q Q
Date
Rocky Point Quarry
Hydrologic Monitoring
rn rn
M
rn
O O
O
O
00 LO
c7
O O
O
cr?
p
N
N
r P
Y^
r
Prepared By. Chad Evenhouse n
Data 4f6F1010 �' ` "Aroro4 nr

Martin Marietta Materials M
V �'
12.00
10.00
J
fN
2
c
0
d 6.00
w
Rocky Point Quarry
Hydrologic Monitoring
Location 22 - Shallow Water Table Gage (NW2)
January 1, 2009 - December 31, 2009
Water Level f Ground Surface t USACE Wetland Criteria --*—Monitoring Depth • Rainfall
N PP 0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
.1
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00 is
c
9.00
10.00
11.00
8 12.00
Gage MMA2 was replaced with R I GSA N 3.00
gage NW2 in January 2009. a c 1 tNovember 5
14.00
4.00
15.00
rn 0)
0 0
rn
0
M
02
rn
0') M rn rn M rn M M rn
0 CDa o a a a o 0
M
O N
t(D
N
CD
N
M
(V
- OO (A M 4 CO �6 M
N Y O O O
O O
N
O
th
O
V
O
+17 to f+ CO O N
O O O O O �— r
Date
Prepared By. Chad Evenhousa
Pate. 41EV2010 r, Z" � A=OOdba rc

'••••••••••••••it•/�••••�••••••�••�••••••••••

Rocky Point Quarry
""a" w..+.nw NW*rio�s� Hydrologic Monitoring
Location 23 - Overburden Gage (NW19)
January 1. 2009 - December 31. 2009
Water Level f Ground Surface Monitoring Depth • Rainfall
30.00
-
0.00
T77
7,
1.00
28.00
2.00
26.00
4
8
3.00
24.00
4.00
22.00
5.00
Approximate
ground
surface
of
aa+acPnt
wetland
area
N 20.00
N
6.00 a:
s
7.00
18.00
-
--
-
-:-
--
-
-
--
-
-
- -
__
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
--
-
0
7
t
8.00
y 16.00
Apptoximlare
elevaf+on
of
USAGE
hydro!
y criteria
C
9.00
LL
0 14.00
WOO
`
11.00
12.00
W
GRON
N
EAS
12.00
10.00
qrc
7
o
lslovern6er
1
13.00
8.00
14.00
.3
15.00
6,00
rn M 0) 0') rn rn rn a� o� rn rn rn
CJ O_ O O Q O O O O O O
_O _O _O
O� (D cD cri r ep fG O OD
O O O c
O
>✓ N M �T l�A cD � co M CD C� N
0 0 0 0 o O o O o o.-
Date
Prepared By Chad Evenhouse
081e, 416l701a

Rocky Point Quarry
'run mwrk ntu 1Mwteri�w►s � Hydrologic Monitoring
30.00
15.00
Location 23 - Deep Groundwater Gage (NW26)
January 1. 2009 - December 31, 2009
Water Level TGround Surface ---W- Monitoring Depth ♦ Rainfall
0.00
1.00
45
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00 v)
7.00 c
8.00 a
9.00
10.00
11.00
Gage NW24 was replaced with
gage NW26 in January 2009.
12.00
13.00
7-'
1 J41
14.00
-15.00 15.00
rn rn M Cr) rn M C�) am rn rn rn rn rn
O OO O O O O OCD OO O O O O CD
COcfl P5 3 cDrn O 0 f•7
O N CV N SCV C14 ! r r O CD O c�
CV c7 V In (ti OD M O
O Q O O O O Q O O O r r
Date
Prepared By. Chad Evenhouse
Date � 41612410 � mC Ils000Yc n¢

Rocky Point Quarry
Moran "its hia`e""it' ^n Hydrologic Monitoring
Location 24 - Overburden Gage (MM5)
January 1, 2009 - December 31, 2009
LWater Level --W-Ground Surface --w- Monitoring Depth ♦ Rainfall
0.00
30.00
10
1.00
2.00
25,47
25.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
cn 20.00
6.00
7.00 U
o
.1
8.00
y
c
15.00
9.00
c
C
10.00
>
11.00
m
W 10.00
12.00
13.00
8,417
14.00
15.00
5.00
M rn rn Cr) rn Cr) rn M rn rn rn rn rn rn
O O O O O O O O O Q O O O O
6l CO CO i i 00 c0 M O o0 irs c=� �—
p O b O CI)
CV (7 IT CD LW (D O rizA
CD O CD CD O O O O O �
Date
Prepared By: Chad Evenhouse
c-n
Date: 47672010 � sM F�ocaec k.

Rocky Point Quarry
"&ru^ &SOrlenw Mwarixs Hydrologic Monitoring
Location 24 - Deep Groundwater Gage (MM4)
January 1. 2009 - December 31, 2009
Water Level (Ground Surface -G -Monitoring Depth ♦ Rainfall
30.00 0.00
`77
f
74
♦
V�
7
7
T
8
1.00
25.00
-Wr�
2.00
20.00
3.00
4-00
1500
'
5.00
10.00
6.00
01
7.00 c
0 5.00
ra
8.00
w
�
0.00
9.00
c
p
10.00
-5.00
>
11.00
W
-10.00
12.00
13.00
-15.00
-
6
1
14.00
15.00
-20.00
rn rn rn M rn rn M rn rn rn rn am rn rn
o C=� a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6) 0 to M o fl c o o0 Ln cn
O N N N CV N r- � � � 0 4 d
r r � CO V CO �3 61 O N N
o Q o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r
Date
Prepared By. Chad Evenhouse
Hate 4/61201D , dry Aswoubs. rc

Rocky Point Quarry
w.t►n u..ie4U Materials
^ A Hydrologic Monitoring
v
Location 25 - Overburden Gage (NW22)
January 1. 2009 - December 31, 2009
Water Level
+Ground Surface
0 Monitoring Depth _ • Rainfall
35.00
ILI oil
0.00
1.00
ji7
� 2.00
30.00
- 3.00
- 4.00
25.00
5.00
J
6.00
hom
7.00
C
0
20 00
8.00
--
9.00
wit
. he ground surface the wetlan
0
15.00T
japproximately
10.00
w
6.5 lower elevation
11.00
m
12.00
10.00
13.00
14.00
5.00
15.00
rn M M M
O O O O
rn 0) rn
O O O
CD rn Cr)rn
CO O O G7 O
0)
O
0
OO
O N N N
N N
M 4 6-0 t 7
CDO
c�
O
C7
Cn
O O O CD
Lf') C0
a a CD
!� Gb 6) O r
O O O
C 4
Date
.
uu►�
r�I1Jlu\��
ii�i
"
■AI
Prepared By Chap Evenhouse
Oate.4!&26t0 CE" �p� M

•�i�����������������������������������������1

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
Rocky Point Quarry
Martin Marietta Materials Hydrologic Monitoring
30.00
25.00
J
to
2 15.00
m
0
m 10.00
a�
LL
C
0
Y
5.00
u1
Location 25 - Deep Groundwater Gage (NW23)
January 1, 2009 - December 31. 2009
Water Level -Ground Surface Monitoring Depth ♦ Rainfall
0.00
7 �V�7 7�11`v V
726 37 7 �T in�. 47�7� 1.00
2.00
I � I
3.00
4.00
5.00
i
6.00 d
i t
7.00 U
8.00 w
>r
00
9.00
10.00
11.00
12.00
I
Q 13.00
14.00
-5.00 15.00
rn o� rn rn M M rn a) rn rn M rn rn rn
a a o O O o 0 0
rn zp co ch � ao cfl ch o as to c�
O N 4V N N N r O O O S7
r — N ('7 V +f) CO N_ OD M O r N N
O O O O O O O O O O r
Date
Prepared By Chad EvenhaoSe
Date. 41&2010 V ,�m

C
fC
d
W
Martin Marietta MaleriMf
V �'
NIXON
• 11
Rocky Point Quarry
Hydrologic Monitoring
Location 25 - Surface Water Level Gage (NW90)
January 1, 2009 - December 31, 2009
L
•
Water
Level
---*—Ditch
Bottom
•
Rainfall
0.00
77
Ip
1.00
it
2.00
3.00
,4.00
5.00
6.00
L
7.00 c
8.00 M
C
s.aa
10.00
I
Elevation of bottom of the ditch
11.a0
approximately 16.5' MSL.
1200
13.00
14.00
14.00
15.00
rn M rn
0 0 0
M
o
rn
a
M rn rn M M M M
o a o o a o 0
rn rn
0 0
M co
O N N
co
N
m
21
00 in
[q �_ f _r O 0
_O
cY r
O M
N
O O Q
M
O
IT
O
Ln (A � 00 O6 r
O O Q O O r
N N
r
Date
Prepared By Chad Evenhouse
Date 416/2010 r O"d !marl rr

UWbn h9AA* ea mmerm"
V �
35.00
30.00
25.00
20.00
5.00
W
0.00
Rocky Point Quarry
Hydrologic Monitoring
Location 26 - Deep Groundwater Gage (MM6)
January 1. 2009 - December 31, 2009
Water Level T Ground Surface -$ Monitoring Depth _ _ ♦ Rain(alf
0.00
1.00
95 2.00
I
3.00
I
4.00
5.00
i
1
�
6.00
7.00 U
8.00 is
i
C
9.00
i
10.00
I
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
5
�
M
M
M
rn
M
M
M
rn
rn
rn
rn
M M
p
O
O
O
C
O
6
O
O
O
O
O C�
O�
C 3
(O
C'7
;5
cD
c*]
O
a0
Ln i--5
O
N
C\!
N
N
CV
�-
r
r
e—
O
a C;)r
N
c*�
to
c 3
m
O
N
O
O
O
C)
O
O
O
CQ
Ca
CD
Date
CO
C3
C'7
N
Prepared By Chao Evenhou5e
Date: 4/6/2010 W4 OdOZINK K

Fe -
Appendix B
Annual Site Inspection Photographs
Low

•
J

f'� 1 i Jam. � �����✓ i��_ �_ �',+• �" '' ';
1 t
l 'r�4•^ r tl�� s� �,��yf 1 �

•
•
•
•
J

pill MIN
Ti.
Photograph 3 — West view of Location 5 (gage CE5) which is closest of the eastern monitoring locations to the active mine area.
Water level is ponded at the surface at the gage, and is effectively maintained by the outlet control structure and dewatering
PFIA
Photograph 4 — East view of Location 5 (CE5) taken at the gage. The PVC pipe in the foreground is a precious gage location
abandoned when the gage unit was maintained and replaced in 2008.
Title I Annual Site Inspection and Visual Assessment Site Photographs
Project MMM -- Rocky Point Quarry Pender County, North Carolina
Date Project Number Appendix -Page
2/17/2010 13-'
1 i:i WII16501MManrtorm&Q(XN Annual RpOApprndix B_Sitr Phowsdoc Prcpwcd by i'hud Ermhouae

i
•
•
•
i

Photograph 5 - Location 6 (gage removed). Visual inspection noted that the water table was at the surface during the inspection on
2/17/2010 and that depressions around the location had ponded water. There was no visible change to the vegetation community or
land surface fi.e. no subsidence or sinkhole develonmentl.
Photograph 6 - Location 6 (gage removed). Soil is saturated at the surface within the managed pine plantation.
Title Annual Site Inspection and Visual Assessment Site Photographs
Project M M M - Rocky Point Quarry
I'r:;..,«., r•Pender County. North Carolina
Date Project Number Appendix -Page
2/17/2010 B-3
II:YWI I lK501UJNonnOMW,2009 Annual ltpt App=dw B Stte Photu.,d— Pmpacd by Chard Fvenhnuw [11" 0-1=a

Photograph 7 -West view of Location 7 (gage N W 15) located in the wet flat wetland area. Water table was observed at the surface
with ponded water in depressions. There was no visible change to the vegetation community or land surface.
Photograph S - Lust view of Location 7 (N W 15).
Title I Annual Site Inspection and Visual Assessment Site Photographs
Project MMM- SelmaSite
r. -,,, ,,, ,•, Johnston County, North Carolina
pate Project Number
2/ t 7/20l o
Appendix -Page
13-4
L1,1PN10111850101MunaunngQ009 Annual Rpi'Appmdu B_Sae Phoiax,doc Pmpe d by ('had Evmhou v con .-- -

&I
•i

RM
0
Photograph 9 - North view of Location 8 (gage CE4) located in the Strawberry Branch floodplain/swamp north of the active mine.
The entire floodplain was inundated at the time of the site inspection.
Photograph 10 - West view of the impounded area upstream of the water control structure. Locations 2 and 10 (gages removed) are
representative of the photograph (Location 2 in the foreground, and Location 10 further in the distance of the ponded area). No
visible chance in the vegetation community or water surface indicatine that the modified numnine Dian has been maintained.
Title I Annual Site Inspection and Visual Assessment Site Photographs
Project MMM - Selma Site
Nep,ord'm Johnston County. North Carolina
^, Date Project Number Appendix -Page
2/17/2010 I3
HA MM I l85OVAMonhunng\1OW Annual RpMpprndw B_Sue Photos.dsw Prepamd by Chad Evrnhaux C=n n."„,

al

i
' I
r-
It 4
`j •r
Photograph 1 I - North view of Location I 1 (gage removed). The location appears to have more arundinaria giganrea (Giant Cane)
indicating that this area may be transitioning to a slightly wetter environment as the area recovers from drought conditions in 2007-
2008.
r
Photograph 12 - South view of Location l I taken from the remaining riser (gage removed). No visible change to the land surface.
Title Annual Site Inspection and Visual Assessment Site Photographs
Project MMM - Selma Site
Prcpacl Fa Johnston County,North Carolina
M
v Date Project Number Appendix -Page
2/ 17/2010 1 S-6
H:1PM01 118501U1MnnrtnnnBUIVY Amnuul Api\Appendu, R_Si c Photos doc Pmpa d by Chrd Fv nhonse [on =.

i
•
•
•
•

f�
4•l ..
•Lti y
�1
1.
Photograph 13 -- East view of Location 13 (gage removed). This depression within the managed pine plantation had ponded water
surrounding the remaining riser at the monitoring location.
r
i
Z
�f
a
Y
Photograph 14 - East view of Location 14 (gage CEC3, to be removed). The gage at Location 14 has historically malfunctioned and
will be removed in 2010. There has been no visible change to the vegetation community (managed pine plantation) or evidence of
subsidence or sinkhole development.
Title Annual Site Inspection and Visual Assessment Site Photographs
Project MMM - Selma Site
Johnston County, North Carolina
Date Project Number Appendix -Page
2/17/2010 13-�
1 PWO1 E 185U][Y•Monnoimg,2AU9 ,Annual RplAppmda B_Sne Phol-doc Prtpamd by C'hgd Evenhouae con _ s.

it
•
•
•
•
•

r
�r.
1,
l
r
Photograph
15 - Monitoring gage at Location 14 appears to have been damaged by bear activity.
• ir.
� •
� � f
4
Y `I
Photograph lb - East view of Location 15 (gage removed). Water was ponded at the surface at the monitoring location. There was
no visible change to the vegetation community or land surface.
Title
Annual Site Inspection and Visual Assessment Site Photographs
Project
MMM - Selma Site
Prcparnl For
Johnston County, North Carolina
•' AA
©ate
Project Number
Appendix -Page
2/ 17/2d1 o
B-R
H:+P.Wl I1890tO\MonammS12OOv Annual RpuAppmdm 8_tiim Phatoa.doc Pmpami by Chad Cvnhuuae [an -a.....,

J

• $x .11w I
a
r � .
1'
Photograph 17 - Area west of Location 15 (cleared by the landowner/hunt club for wildlife management). This open area shows the
water table at the surface and large portions of the site ponded with surface water.
r
Photograph 18 - North view of Location 16 (gage removed). Water table was observed at the surface during the site inspection.
There was no visible change to the vegetation community or land surface.
Title Annual Site Inspection and Visual Assessment Site Photographs
Project MMM - Selma Site
Pfepe d F­ Johnston County, North Carolina
---__-._
%.i. Date Project Number Appendix -Page
2/ 17/2010 8-9
RXP"l 119501 OIManaonngl2tlW Annual NptNppenda 6 Sitr Phulus.dnc Prnpumd by Chad Ncnhuuse [an ., d.

�l
1
i�
♦y
nR
Photograph 19 — East view of Location 17 (gage removed). Water is ponded in depressions surrounding the remaining riser. Water
table was observed at the surface. There was no visible change to the vegetation community or land surface.
IM
r•
eke,
Photographe f�
r J
dd}
F'
:t
Photograph 20 — Remaining riser are Location 17. Observed saturated soil at the ground surface and ponded water in adjacent
depressions.
Title Annual Site Inspection and Visual Assessment Site Photographs
Project MMM - Selma Site
p«Johnston tyNorth Carolina
v� Date Project Number Appendix -Page
2/ 17/2010 B_ 10
1i M01118501MMonennng'.10W Annual RprAppeudla 13 Site Pholm.doc Pspwed by Chad C4enhouxe [an =

+ y
R'
.aAa
4.0
102
_ r
Photograph 21 - North view of Location 18 (gage removed). Water table was observed at ten inches below the ground surface at this
location during the inspection. Where was no visible change to the vegetation community or land surface.
lti �V
=1T�J
Photograph 22 - Downstream (south) view of the drainage ditch in the southern portion of the site (Tract E) at monitoring Location
19 (NW I, surface water gage). Water level was approximately six inches from the bottom of the ditch during the site inspection, an
there was evidence of higher storm flows debris and wrack lines along the banks).
Title
Annual Site Inspection and Visual Assessment Site Photographs
Project
MMM - Selma Site
Prepaed For
Johnston County, North Carolina
A
Date
Project Number
Appendix -Page
2/17/2010
B-1 I
H'',PNQI I III50101.Monrtonng'2009 Annust RpalApprndu B Snc Phnwa doc P,cpa d by Chad Fvcnho"r Cs" � � R

1;.
.ett PMF� -,,I-,
L I" ' 1, 'i, v
� � � �
Photograph 23 — Riser portion of NWI at Location 19
',� r
i
Lam' � ♦r -- • 1,, �-`�.(..... Ut11 - �• I
Photograph 24 — South view of Location 20 (NW4, shallow water table gage). Soil was saturated at the ground surface, although
there were no ponded areas around the location at the time of the inspection. Also, there was no visible change to the vegetation
community or land surface.
Title I Annual Site Inspection and Visual Assessment Site Photographs
Project MMM — Selma Site
Rc, .oral I -or Johnston County, North Carolina
w�ao. �r�.r rrww. A A
Date Project Number Appendix -Page
2/17/2010 13-12
H:1PN161 1185(11OMonl(anneJ(H)9 Annual RpOApMdu B_51u Pholm doc Pmp=d by ('hd! kenhowe can .

i
•
•
•
•
i
•
•
•
•
•
i
•
•
•
•
•

� r 4
i •
A
l
s ..
1\I;Irk It,
•, 'r !� '«`^'>` 1, } �� � r+F' it '�r'"�'� 'FI • �I �r
�; l r• � � 4s A I y. * r �,����� 1i �� � j1
i yr; �a j .,I•, �.� _i . �-�� ��� t
A fr7T
li 1
Photograph 26 - West view of the swamp area taken from the gage at Location 21.
Annual Site Inspection and Visual Assessment Site Photographs
MMM - Selma Site
Johnston County, North Carolina
Date Projectr r r
I I
H:�PkWi i IN5111o',Mmmunng41RWAnnual Rpt,Appcndw B_Sur Phnnu Jac Prep=d by Chud F.v"huuue Can �r�.xrR

d
WZ A
Y'
Photograph 27 - South view of Location 22 (NW2, shallow water table gage). Soil was saturated at the ground surface during the
inspection although there was no ponded water surrounding the gage. There was no visible change to the vegetation community or
land surface.
'a
Photograph 28 - Fallen tree adjacent to Location 21 showing water table approximately one foot below the ground surface.
Title
Annual Site Inspection and Visual Assessment Site Photographs
Project ect
MMM - Selma Site
P;qP ej 1„r
Johnston County, North Carolina
M
v
Date
Project Number
Appendix -Page
2/ 17/2010
13-14
11:TNW1 118501VMuntamn 2(XNAnnul RpVApprnda B_Sue Phaiub.doc Prepared by Chad Evenhn"c c:zn� �.

al

I I I'NM I [H5111O\Monnonny121MW Annual RptlAppendu 6_Sue Phoios.doc Prcpa d by Chad i-vcnhouic [mn

r;3 -yl
- - h
Photograph 33 - Bast view of Location 26 (deep groundwater gage). No visible change to the vegetation community or land surface.
tr
a�
i
a-
i
Photograph 34 — North view of the newly -constructed outlet structure for the northern portion of the abandoned pit (swamp along
Strawberry Branch is seen in the distance). This will be the outlet for the reclaimed northern pit once the pit recharges in 2010.
Title
Annual Site Inspection and Visual Assessment Site Photographs
Project
MMM - Selma
Prepared For
Johnston County,North Carolina
Number
Appendix
Date
Project
-Page
2/17/2010
[3-17
H:rPWI118501ilWonitonn%0*9 Annual RpMppenda 8 Site Pbutos.dac Prepured by Chad Pvenhousc

❑ � ❑ Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
April 6, 2010
MS. Linda % illis
NC 1.)ivision ol' Water Quality
127 Cardinal Drive Ext
Wilrrrin+,lon, NC 28405-2004
Ile: 2009 Ai mml Monitorin+Report
Martin Marietta Materials Rocky Point Quarry
fender Comity, NC
Ocar Ms. Willis:
Attached is the 2009 Annwrl Monitorin+,, Report for the Rocky Point Quarry III
Pendcr County, NC for your review and comment. In sunrnlary, the nlollilorim,
prc�s,r;mr at the duarry has continued to demonstrate that dewaterin" activities
have not had adverse effects on adjacent wetland andand sircmil systcnns.
As we discussed dririn+, the field review mectin, on f ebruary 18. 2010, Martin
Marietta Materials (ti-lMjM) is completim, construction ofan internal dike that
will allow the northern portion of the pit to be abandoned, reclaimed. and
allowed to rechar!,e. This will reduce IivClrolo+,ic inllucnce firm dcwcrtcrin, to
the areas east of mine which are currently part ofthe monitoriui, pro -ram.
Once the pit rcrhar-cs tlrc numitgrirt0 Liale <l [.,ocalion 5 should be nillicicnt to
demonstrate 11IMIM's continued nlanaIcmeilt of dewatcrin,0 dischar'�-le and
sustained hvdrolo,v east of [he mine. We will look forward to reviewin, tfte site
with you a`,ain as this portion of -the site is r'cclaimcd and allowcd to
Please feel free to contact me at 919-677-2121 or chad.cvcnhousc o kinrlcv-
horn.com should you have any questions Or aced additional ill l,ornr<uion.
Very truly yours,
KIMI,F;Y-1-101ZN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Chad Iverihouse, PWS
Project M anaoer
Attaclimcnl
Cc: Horace Willson, Martin Monello Materials
■
TEL [phone]
FAX [phone]
M
P.O. Box 33068
Raleigh, North Carolina
27636.3068

i
0
Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
M e in o r a n d u in
Bale: November 12, 2008
Project: Martin Marietta Materials: Rocky Point Quarry
Pender County, North Carolina
Subjcet: Notes ['or the project meeting to discuss the Hydrologic Monitoring Summary (2002-
2008) and Program Anzendozent Proposal (submitted to the North Carolina Division of
Water Quality on October 15, 2008)
Attendees: Linda Willis, North Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ)
Horace Willson, Martin Marietta Materials (MMM)
Chad EVCnh0L1se, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (KHA)
Background
The lollowing contains a summary of the project meeting with DWQ regarding the Hydrologic
Monitoring Summary (2002-2008) and Program Amendment Proposal for the MMM Rocky Point Quarry
in Pcnder County, NC.
The meeting was held to review the evolution of monitoring objectives for the site, permitting history,
analysis of data collected to dale in regards to these objectives, and a proposal to amend the monitoring;
program for the future.
KHA presented a brief history of the permitting and wetland hydrology discussions between the
regulatory agencies and MMM that developed the current monituring program at Rocky Point Quarry.
The issues discussed in the past became the monitoring objectives for the project, and now the data record
is sufficient to evaluate the effectiveness of the water management activities in minimizing hydrologic
impacts to adjacent wetlands from mine dewatering.
November 12, 2008
Rocky Point Quarry
DWQ project meeting notes

In addition, the current permitted mine expansion is southward and eastward expansion is complete.
Therefore, the summary document was submitted to evaluate the data available to date with respect to the
monitoring objectives, as well as propose amendments to improve monitoring locations south of the
mining activities while maintaining monitoring to the cast through a reduced number of locations,
Discus.vion
The following observations were discussed at the meeting.
Eastern Tracts G] H1 H2 Strawberry Branch
• The deeper groundwater and overburden gages at Locations 2 and 3 (east of the mine) show that
the dewatering influence in the deeper aquiferllimestonc is likely 1,500-2,000 feet from the mine
and hydrology of the overburden 1,500 feet (Location 3) from the mine is unaffeeted by the
dewatering activities.
• Stream and floodplain hydrology of Strawberry Branch and its adjacent swamp wetlands have
been unaffected by the reduction of mine dewatering discharge through the relucation of a
portion of that flow to the water control structures and hydrologic barrier/recharge trench around
® G 1 and between the mine and the H I tract.
• The recharge trench around Gl has been effective in sustaining surface and near -surface
hydrology in wetland areas closest to the mine.
• The drainage Swale between H1 and H2 has been effectively recharged through the water
management plan and maintaining discharge to the water control structure in G 1.
• Location 7 data shows that the wet flat wetland that largely comprises the 1­12 tract has exhibited
wetland hydrology throughout the monitoring period to date. '['his wetland environment, typical
of a wet flat, is hydrologically dominated by precipitation and clearly shows that under normal
conditions, water table levels arc near the surface throughout the year except for the peak
portions of the growing season.
• Other monitoring locations within the H2 tract (15, 16, and 17) correlate well with the data
shown in Location 7 indicating that the entire wetland in 1-12 has maintained wetland hydrologic
functions as the mine advanced eastward between 2004 and 2006.
• The gages in the HI tract, .Locations 6, 13, 14, and 19, have had difficulties through the
monitoring period to date in providing consistent data. This is likely due the water table
fluctuating more rapidly and with higher amplitude (i.e. within the upper 5 or 6 feet of the soil
rather than the upper 2 to 3 feet of soil). This may be causing a greater tendency for the well
screens to clog with fine sediments, as well as for suction to occur at the pressure probe in the
® November 12, 2005 Rocky Point Quarry
DWQ project meeting notes
2

E
bottom of the casing. Compared to the H2 tract, the Hl tract has similar soils and topography,
and both tracts lack interior drainage ditches. However, the HI tract has been managed for
timber production and has significant surface disturbance from bedding and rows, and the H2
tract is unmanaged and has re-established with natural pocosin-type vegetation. The water table
data in H1 shows that this tract rarely meets wetland hydrology criteria. However, there is
evidence that there is an active water table in the upper surface indicating that the hydrology of
this site is likely more influenced by the vegetation community than mine dewatering.
Southern "tracts
• The gages in Locations 20, 21, and 22 have provided limited data and need to be replaced.
• The overburden gages at locations 23, 24, and 25 show that the stream/wetland system southwest
of the current mine expansion is hydrated. A sketch of the groundwater monitoring and adjacent
wetland area is attached as discussed at the meeting.
• As monitoring of the southern tracts continue, it will be useful to add a surface water level gage
to the drainage Swale to be able to characterize the surface water levels in the system in relation
® to the adjacent overburden gages.
Conclusiol;s
The hydrologic monitoring program at Rocky Point Quarry has been successful in demonstrating that
mine dewatering activities have not had an adverse effect on adjacent wetlands, and that through
management of dewatering discharge, surface water may be utilized to minimize offsite hydrologic
impacts while mining is ongoing. For future monitoring, the recommended changes proposed in the
summary document were accepted by DWQ with the addition of maintaining a monitoring gage in 'Tract
Hl at Location 14. Also, for all gage locations where the data logger is to be removed, the well casing
will remain and capped to be checked manually on an annual basis, This annual inspection/site evaluation
will be dOCumented and included in the annual report to be submitted to DWQ.
Therefore, MMM will implement the approved amendments to the monitoring program and will
rehabilitate all of the monitoring locations to remain as discussed in the summary document, including the
additional location discussed at the 1 1/12/2008 meeting (Location 14, Tract H1). It is anticipated that the
amended monitoring program will be implemented by mid -December and that documentation of that
effort will be prepared and submitted to DWQ by the end of December 2008.
® November 12, 2008 Rocky Point Quarry
DWQ project meeting notes
3

As discussed at (lie meeting, submittal of this documentation, along with the remainder of 2008 data, will
serve as the annual report required for the NPDE5 permit. Also, for 2009 and beyond, annual monitoring
reports will be submitted to DWQ at the end of December of each year while mining activities continue at
the site.
END
HAIPMU11185U10A)WQ mretin#;notes 11-12.2009.doe
•
® November 12, 2008 Rocky Point Quarry
DWQ project meeting notes

•
rZK4mley-Hcm
i — and AssobEles, Irc 5hee! NO � ef—
(bvv%WI-Czcxky �,;..� y 5 �r k +firer,, 1-,.ce4':4_ job tap
Designedby Date checkedhy Dale L�
7kGd-cL,.�...if%s/I ,'_5
(\��� w+•Ci+^'S <3 i-�a4-T j .Lii��.:�- �..�"'� f.�'.G`� Gs,.[C�+T' '�"'�"rCl..��.�GVG3't.G�--••{ � y.Jo� �4� r �
✓�.3 Lc-, vt,I G...•_ p �.. CI, ,�� !�l`C C-C��,'+G. C)") /`.10 4VI , ^:5.. 5 e-5 a
1 5 ell [ �. GtiJr�.� c4 u, r� C try-. kl % C G� c�L V� C� c'c�•.. A.
-C�1(i 1AJ 5 (o ov j- lt�-�c.L"' ��+t i n_. p 'QVQCb�JC�CCw„C�
V r
a s
Dice I,elt
.0u&14,r,ch,...1e. [.:
.3
One of FOB7UNE's 100 Best Companies to Work For

•
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
July 15, 2008
Mr. Horace Wilson
Martin Marietta Materials
P.O. Boa 30013
Raleigh, North Carolina 27622-0013
Re: NPDES Compliance Inspection
Rocky Point Quarry
Permit NCG020166
Pender County
Dear Mr. Wilson,
Colcen 11. Sullins, Dircclor
Division of Water duality
Thank you for your response to the inspection letter dated June 25, 2008. The intended
corrective actions are appreciated. The maintenance described should resolve the problems this
facility has experienced with high total suspended solids from outfall 001.
Please have Doug Pope contact nee at the Wilmington Regional Office when the maintenance
activities are completed. I will update the files at that time and close out the inspection report
indicating appropriate actions were taken. Thank you for addressing this issue promptly. I
appreciate both your efforts in this matter.
Should you have any questions or concerns regarding this correspondence, please do not hesitate
to contact me at the Wilmington Regional Office at 910-796-7343. You may also reach me at
my email address linda.willisnancmaii.net.
Best Regards,
Linda Willis
Environmental Engineer I
Division of Water Qualitv
Surface Water Protection Section
Cc: WiRO files NCG020166
DWQ CO files
Mailing Address Phone [phone] Location NOnc�
1617 Mail Service Center Fax (919) 807�ia92 512 N. Salisbury St. �/� t l ,�iCarol
in
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Raleigh, Nr 27604
Internet: w_Stivr.n�wateruualit}.ori CuslomerService 1-877-623.67j8
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer - 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper

m
•
11
Martin Marietta Materials
P. 0. Box 30013
Raleigh, North Carolina 27622-0013
Telephone [phone] .
E-mail: horace.willson a; martinmarietta.com
Ilorace S. Willson
1"iwirorsmental Services
Certified Mail: Return Receipt Requested
.IUIV 8, 2008
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Nis. Linda Willis
P.nvironmental Engineer 1
Surface water Prot;ction Section
127 Cardinal Drive..L-Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
RE: NPD) S Compliance
Rocky Point Quarry
Permit NCG020166
fender County
Dear Nis. Willis
c�mz vsD
'[j!
In response to your .lime 25, 2008 inspection letter regarding our outfall 001 at Rocky Point, we
offer the: following corrective action:
As you may remember during our inspection on April 25, 2008, Plant Manager Doug Pope was
in the process of building up a stone pad next to the sump serving outfall 001. This pad is needed
to support the dragline machine that will be used -to repair the sump.
In talking with Doug Pope about this project, he plans to do the following work:
l) Plans to excavate and expand the sump hole, is to begin in approximately two weeks. The
surface area of the sump will be expanded to 2 to 3 times the current sire and will be
excavated to a depth of approximately 20 feet. This change should give an adequate area
for proper settling.

S i z
. Ms. Linda Willis
July 8, 2008
Page 2
2) flans are to also excm,ate the settling; area at the immediate pipe discharge point above
the sump for further settling before the-watcr enters (lie series of eanals, approxima0y
6,400 feet, that leads to the outfall paint off the property.
3} The sump at outfall 001 will be maintained by further excavation of sediment as needed
in the future.
We trustthat the above plan to repair the sump serving outfall 001 ineets with you're approval_
Please give one a call at 9191783-4631 if you should have any questions.
Sincerely,
�AIOIOV—I-C IdjAwn
!brace Willson
Environmental Services Department
•
cc: Doug Pope
Ray Thatcher
0

Martin Marietta Materials
P. O. Box 30013
Raleigh, North Carolina 27622-0013
Telephone [phone]
E-Mail: horace.willson a, martinmarietta.com
Horace S. Willson
Environmental Services
Certified Mail: Return Receipt Requested
July 8, 2008
North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Ms. Linda Willis
Environmental Engineer 1
Surface water Protection Section
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
RIH: NPDES Compliance
Rocky Point Quarry
Permit NCG020166
Pender County
Dear Ms. Willis
BY;
JUL 0 9 2008
In response to your June 25, 2008 inspection letter regarding our outfall 001 at Rocky Point, we
offer the following corrective action:
As you may remember during our inspection on April 25, 2008, Plant Manager Doug Pope was
in the process of building up a stone pad next to the sump serving outfall 001. This pad is needed
to support the dragline machine that will be used to repair the sump.
In talking with Doug Pope about this project, he plans to do the following work:
1) Plans to excavate and expand the sump hole, is to begin in approximately two weeks. The
surface area of the sump will be expanded to 2 to 3 times the current size and will be
excavated to a depth of approximately 20 feet. This change should give an adequate area
for proper settling.
0

Ms. Linda Willis
July 8, 2008
Page 2
2) Plans are to also excavate the settling area at the immediate pipe discharge point above
the sump for further settling before the water enters the series of canals, approximately
6,400 feet, that leads to the outfall point off the property.
3) The sump at outfall 001 will be maintained by further excavation of sediment as needed
in the future.
We trust that the above plan to repair the sump serving outfall 001 meets with you're approval.
Please give me a call at 919/783-4631 if you should have any questions.
Sincerely,
yy4ft�
Horace Willson
I nvironmental Services Department
•
cc: Doug Pope
Ray Thatcher
C.

;w
Martin Marietta Materials
P. 0. Box 3001'
Raleigh, North Carolina 27622-0013
Telephone [phone]
E-Mail: horace.willson a,martinmarietta.com
Horace S. Willson
Environmental services
CERTIFIED MAIL: Return Receipt Requested
July 14, 2008
Mr. Edward Beck
Environmental PRG SPV III
NC Division of Water Quality
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
RE: Martin Marietta Materials
Rocky Point Quarry
Year 4 Monitoring Report Through April 2008
Dear Mr. Beck:
R F=�IV�D
JUL Y 8 2008
BY:
In accordance with Certification No. 3452 which was issued to Martin Marietta Materials on
March 15, 2004, we are enclosing; two copies of our Wetland Monitoring; and Pumping Plan
Report for Year 4. This report covers activities occurring since April 2007 through April 2008.
Included in the report is the following information:
• Executive Summary and Conclusions.
Summary of Monitoring Gages in Shallow Wells (16), Deep Wells (6), Overburden
Wells (5) and Surface Wells (3). The entire well network consists of 30 wells.
0 Data by Tract and Well Location # - Site Inspection forms & Graphical Gage Data

:y
We have experienced some difficulty with downloading some of the wells. One of the problems
is having too much data to unload. The wells were originally set up to measure every hour. This
gives 24 readings per day per well, which is overkill. The are now set up to measure daily, which
will greatly reduce the amount of data being collected.
Visual inspections have verified that the pumping plan is providing; sufficient hydrology to the
tracts noted as 1-11 and F12 on the aerial map shown in Figure 1. The long; drainage ditch located
along the eastern edge of the timber road that separates tracts G 1 & G2 from tracts 1-11 & 1-I2 is
providing; a buffer from the mining activity located to the east. The flashboard risers in this ditch
are designed to maintain an adequate depth of water along the entire length of the ditch and the
canal surrounding; the eastern portion of tract G 1.
Further inspections at each monitoring gage location has shown no evidence of instability,
eroding, sloughing, subsidence, collapse and/or removal o#'hydrology. Photographs of each
monitoring location are included in the Appendix by tract number.
Request for Reduction:
In a separate letter, dated June 10, 2008, we have made a request to reduce the large number of
monitoring wells we are required to monitor on tracts G1, 1-11 and 112. All of'these areas are
located on the eastern edge ofthe pit operation. A good many of these wells are either under
water or in very wet areas. Also, mining; towards the cast, where these wells are located, will be
discontinued shortly. All future mining will be to the south.
We trust that the attached Year 4 Monitoring; Report meets with your approval. We will be
glad to meet with you on site to show you how well this system is working;. Please give me a call
at 919/783-4631 if you should have any questions.
Sincerely, 3
X/X444 t'
fvj-a�
Horace Willson
Environmental Services Department

•
E
Martin Marietta Materials
P. O. Box 30013
Raleigh, North Carolina 27622-0013
Telephone [phone]
E-Mail: horace.willson u,niartin,narietta,com
Horace S. Willson
Environmental Services
(:ertilied 19ai1: Return Receipt Reguested
,tune 10, 2008
Mr. Edward Beck
Environmental PRG SPV III
NC Division of Water Quality
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
RE: Rocky Point Quarry
fender County _
Reduced Monitoring Request
Dear Mr, Beck:
As noted in my letter to you dated May 27, 2008, we are working on the Year 4 Monitoring;
Report that we hope to get to you by August 1. Our delay in getting this report to you has been
due to a problem in downloading the massive amount of data i-rom all 30 monitoring well gages.
Also in the May 27`h letter, we mentioned that we would be requesting a reduction in the number
of monitoring wells we are required to monitor. This letter addresses that request.
Back in 2002, we began developing, a pumping and monitoring plan to monitor any wetland
impacts that may develop as we proceeded to mine towards the east. To monitor the potential
impacts, our consultant, Kimley-Horn, developed a monitoring well network throughout this
area. A total of 21 monitoring well gages were installed

In later negotiations with the Division of Water Quality and the U. S. Army Corps of lynggineers,
we agreed to suspend mining to the east and begin mining; to the south on the Plum Creek
Timber property.
After the pumping plan was put into place in May, 2004, a continuous Floe' of pit water has been
diverted into the main drainage ditch that runs between tracts G 1,62 and 1-11.1-12. An outfalI
located near the upper portion of tract GI allows this water to continue under the timber road and
out into tracts H 1 and 1-12. This continuous flow of water has flooded some areas and created
very wet and muddy conditions in other areas.
A good many of these monitoring welts are now either under water or located in very wet
conditions. Ms. Linda Willis of your office visited the quarry on April 25, 2008. We grave her a
brief tour of some of the well locations and the outfalI area. Ms. Willis was in agreement that
some ofthese well locations were useless due to the wet conditions surrounding; them. -L.--�9
D We strongly feel that all wells located east of the long; drainage ditch separating; tracts G 1, G2
from HI,H2 are no longer needed. Any impacts from the pit are intercepted by the wall of water
maintained in the drainage ditch. We are willing to continue monitoring most of these wells but
not those that are standing in water or are located in very wet areas. Just getting to some of these
wells requires wading into waters with very muddy bottoms. At times, it is not possible to reach
some of them. ']'his is also dangerous when the observer is alone, which is usually the case.
In light of the above circumstance, we are requesting; that the following~ well monitoring; Q}
locations be removed trom the network:
t
v Tract G 1
)j4l a
Well NW 21 (at location # 2 under water) kIS`
PAooWell NW 26 (at location # 2 under water).z,Well NW 1 l (at location # 5 under water)
I Well NW 15 (at location # 10) underwater)
Tract H 1:
Well NW 8 (at location # 3 very wet & muddy)
Well NW 17 (at location # 3 very wet & muddy)
Well NW 20 (at location # 3 very wet & muddy)
Well NW 25 (at location # 3 very wet & muddy)
Tract H2•
Well NW 5 (at location # 8 very wet & muddy)
Well NW 7 ' (at location # 8 very wet & muddy)
Photographs are attached showing the conditions at each well location. "hhere are also several
photographs showing; the flow of water through the system.

El
•
11
With these wells removed from the network, we will still have ninc monitorin,, wAs locLltcC on
the east side of the long drainage ditch.
We trust that you will agree with our request to remove those wells that are actually tinder water
or are in very wet and muddy areas. We will be glad to meet with you or your stall'on site and
visit each well location to verify the conditions stated above. Please give me a call il'you should
have any questions about this request.
Sincerely,
X/&�
Horace Willson
hnvironmental Services Department

ROCK' POINT MONITORING GAUGES —TRACT G1
Site Visit April 23, 2008
Eo
m
Wells NW21 — right and NW26 left — Under Water
OWell NW 15 — Under water.

ROCKY POINT MONITORING GAUGES —TRACT HI
r�
U
Wells NW20 — right and NW25 — left very wet.
Site Visit April 23, 2008

ROCKY POINT MONITORING GAUGES — TRACT H2
Site Visit April 23, 21W8
0 Wells NW5 --- foreground and NW7 — background — Very wet.

r
�^ ` ��i '� ���°. S} ' S 1 t It a� �,r ••F�� �.
.t�E';?'G
���
014
r;`�'�_ .,��••xi�_-�'���.dr_��ti''�i�_ ���,r•._. ��r.

16

Martin Marietta Materials
P, 0. Bob 30013
Raleigh, North Carolina
Telephone [phone]
13-Mail: h orace.w i I I son nwiiiartinmarietta.com
May 27, 2008
Mr. Edward Beck
Environmental PRG SPV III
NC Division of Water Quality
127 Cardinal Drive Extension
Wilmington, NC 28405
RE: Martin Marietta Materials
Rocky Point Quarry
Request For Extension Of Time
Dear Mr. Beck:
REC-EI VEIL
pax:
MAY 2 8 2008
We are in the process of developing our Year 4 Monitoring Report covering the 30 some odd
monitoring wells at our Rocky Point Quarry. According to our permit, Certification No. 3452,
this report should be submitted by .tune 1 of each year.
We have decided to do this report in-house so that we are familiar with the program iu case we
will need a similar monitoring; network at one of our other coastal operations.
Unfortunately, we have run into a problem in downloading the massive amount of data. The
current program takes a well reading every hour. This amounts to approximately 720 data points
per day, or a total of262,800 data points per year!
We are trying to work through this data to develop the graphs for each monitoring well. We feel
that it will take us another month or two to get this information together in a format that will be
useful.

ti
Because of the above problems in downloading this data, we would like to request an extension
ol'time to complete this report. U possible, could the deadline for this report be extended to
August 1?
Please give me a call at 919-783-4631 ii'you have any questions.
Sincerely.
11X&tA-'
k;fflAwn
Horace Willson
Environmental Services

COUNTY:
RIVER BASIN:
itE:P(mT'ro :
Wk( z
S1111'PFI) Ily :
Courier
COLLECTUK(S):
� Ott` L�
Fstirnmed BOD Range:
Seed:
Chlurivatcd:
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - LAB FORM
E SAMPLE TYPE
PRIORITY
AMBIENT � QA � STREAM � EFFLUENT
COMPLIANCE CHAIN OF CUSTODY 0 LAKIi � INFLUENT
EMI RGFNCl' SPECIAL. STUDY I_sT[JnHY
Co►n Plain}- Visit ID�
Station Loeation:
Remarks:
I-ub Number:
Date Received
Time Received
Received By:
Station tl CC
Datc Begin (yylrnnrldd)
Date End (yy/mm/dd)
Time Kegin
Time End
Depth - DNI, DII, DBM Value Type - A, H, L
Camposite-T, 5, It.
Sample'I
130D 310 mg/L
Chloride 940 mg/L
jL-
NH3 as N 610 mg/1-
Li- Lithium 1132 ugli-
COD High 340 rng/L
Chi a: 70953 pg/L
)L
TKN as N 625 mg/1-
Mg- Magnesium 92' m_e1l-
COD Low 335 rng/l.
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/L
Nin- Manganese 10: pg/L
Coliforrn: %1F Fcca1 31010 #/100 mis
P: Total as P 665 mg/L
Na- Sodium 929 mg11-
Coliform: N11--'rotas 31504 #/100 mis
Color: True 80 c.u.
PO4 as P 70507 mg/1-
As- Arsenic:Total 14 µg/F_
Coliform: Tube fecal 31615 #/100 mis
Color: (PI1) 83 c.u.
N Dissolved as P 666 mg/l.
Se- Selenium 1 t47 Pg/L
Colilbml: Fecal Strep 31673 0100 MIS
Color: pi -I 7.6 82 c.u.
IC- Potassium mg/L
Ilg- Mercury 71900 jig![ -
Residue: Total 500 melt,
Cyanide 720 m8/1.
Cd- Cadmium 1027 pgll-
132• Barium PglL
Volatile 505 trig/l.
Fluoride 951 mg/L
Cr-Chromiurwl'wal 1034 pgJL
Organochlotine Pesticides
Fixed 510 tng/L
Forinaldehyde 71880 mg/L
Cu- Copper 1042 µg11-
Organophospborus Pesticides
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/I.
Grease and Oils 556 mg/l-
Ni- Nickel 1067 µg/L
Valatile 535 nig/l,
Hardness 'total 900 mg/L_
Pb- Lead 1051 pg/L
Acid Herbicides
Fixed 540 rng/L
Specific Coud. 95 µmhostern")
Zn- Zinc 1092 pg/L
pH 403 units
N113AS 38260 mg/L
V- Vanadium yg1L
13ase/Neutral&-Acid I:mracuth
Acidity it) pIi 4.5 436 mg/L
11henois 32730 µglL
Ag- Silver 1077 µg/L
TP) t Diesel Range
Acidity to p11 8.3 435 mgll,
Sulfate 945 mgA.
Al- Aluminum 1105 µg/L
Alkalinity to pit 8.3 415 nig/L
Sulfide 745 mg/L
Be- Beryllium 1012 µg/L
Purgeahlc Organics (VOA brit
Alkalinity to pit 4.5 410 mg/L
Boron: Total 1022 µg/L
Ca- Calcium 916 mg/L
TPH Gasoline Range
TOC.680 mg/L
Tannin & Lignin 32240 pg)L
Co -Cobalt t037 pglL
7'PU1I3TI;X (lanoline Range
Turbidity 82079 NTIJ
Hexavalcttt Chromium 1032 pg1L
Fe- Iron 1045 pg/1.,
Phymplankion
(;olifanr) Total Tube 31508 q/100 nits
COMMENTS
:
LA It USE ONLY
Te Dille ra trite
on arrival (°C):
Sample Paint %(2)
Conductance (94)
Waler'renip-C (10) D.U. (300)
pis (400)
8.3 Alkalinity (82244
4,S Alkalinity (431) 4.5 Acidity (82243 8.3 Acidity (82242)
�Air'fcnlp
Sdcehi depth m
�at:inity ppt (490)
Precipit-Inlday (45) Cloud Cover % (32)
Wind Dir-Deg (36
Stan F�louw Sev (i 35I
Turbidity Severity (13 Wind Velocity•mp Mean Strm Ltepth-ft (64)
Simi Wh
m

C0U.NTY :
Nz,x,
RIVER BASIN :
gs�i4'
RF11010 "I"O:
Vll>"s•
SHIPPED BY :
Courier
COLLEC 0146) :
1,\1,1.(s•,.
Estimated ROU Range-
DIVISION OF WATFR QUALITY - LAB FORM
PRloion,
AMBIENT � QA
COMPLIANCE CHAIN GI= CUSTODY
F-111FRGENCY SPECIAL STUDY
Station I,ucation: 1"Cv �J��V• ivCl'4L
FwJ SAMPLEi TYPE
STRI:Ahl 0 EFFLUENT
LAKE INFLUFNT
ED ESTUARY
Lab Numher:
Dote Received
'rims Received
Receives! By
Data ROcised
Date Reported
Seed: Chlorinated:
Remarks:
Station 4
Cs•
hate Begin (yylmnt/4d)
Dale End (yy/rnnildd)
Time Begin
rime End
Depth - IM1, Dli, D13jN1 Value Type -A. 11, 1-
Composite-T, S, B
Sample'1
ILjcrI1
11lo
1r�1c;l�lls
Ic�}o
l�rtc
O.t
l-.GL
1301) )VU
Ing/1.
I
Chloride 940
mg/L
)cl
NEi3 as N 610
mg/1-
Li- I.ithium 1132 ugll-
COD High 340
mgIL
Cht a: 70953
►rja/!-
<-
l,KN as N 625
mgir,
Nlg- Magnesium 92' mgfi-
C.'OD Lose 335
mg/L
'X-
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630
mglL
N1n- Manganese 10' pg1L
C:oliform: P1F Fccal 31616
il1100 mis
}'' Total 2S P (zCrS
mgJL
Na- Sodium 929 mg/l.
Loiiform: N1F"rotal 31504
N/100 mis
Color: True g0
C.u.
1`04 a5I' 70507
mg/1-
As- Arscruc:Tota1 It µgA,
C ulifonn Tuhc fecal 31615
Sr/100 MIS
Color: (PIi ) 81
C.U.
P: Dissolved as P 606
mg/L
Se- Selenium t f t7 pgH-
C:olititrm: Decal Strop 31673
9/100 mis
Color: pH 7.6 82
c.u,
K- Potassium
rng/L
Ilg- Mercury 71000 µfill.
Residue: Total 500
mg/1-
Cyanide 720
mg/L
Cd- C'adrnium 1027
µg/1-
Ba- Barium µg/L
Volatile 505
mg/l.
Fluoride 951
mg/L
Cr- Chromium:'Tutal 1034
jig/I,
Organochlorine Pesticides
1 ixed 510 -
mglL
Formaldehyde 71 HMO
mg1L
Cu- Copper 1042
jIg/L
Organophosphorus Pesticides
RCSOLIC Suspended 530
mg/l.
Grease and Oils 536
mglL
Ni- Nickel 1067
py,/L
Volatile 535
mgll,
hardness 'Total 900
mg!L.
Pb, I -cad 1051
µg,/L
Acid Herbicides
Fixed 540
rng/1-
Speciric Cund. 95
pmhos/cnt2
7n-Zinc 1092
jig/L
pit 4)3
units
MESAS 38201)
mg1L
V. Vanadium
µg/L
I4asc1Neuiral&Acid Fxrractabl.
Acidity to pll 4"5 436
mgli
Phenols 32730
pg/l.
Ag- Silver 1077
µe/L
TPII Diesel Range
Acidity to PFI 8.3 435
mg/L
Sulfate 945
mg/[.
Al� Aluminum 1105
erg/L
Alkalinity to ph ii.3 415
mg/l,
$ulfidc 745
mg/l.
Re- }3esyllium 1012
pg1L
Purgeable Organics (VOA bout
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410
mg/i-
IiUron: Total 1022
µg/L
Ca- Calcium 916
mg/L
'rPI [ Gasoline Range
Tt)C (380
mg/L
Tannin & Lignin 32240
pg/l..
Co- Cobalt 1037
µg/L
TPl t1 ATFI51 Gasoline Range
Turbidity iQu7s)
NTU
Hexavalcot Chromium 1032
pg/L
Fe- Iron 1045
1 Phytoplankton
Coliform "rota) Tube 31508
41100 etas
C"OSIyIE;NI'S :
LAIC USE ONLY
Teniperalllre
rrival (°C):a
Sample Point "o f2) Conductance (94)
Water letup C {10)
i).U. (300) pl[ (400)
8.3 Alkakinit}' (82244 4.5 Alkalinity 1431}
4.5 Acidity
(82243
8"3 Acidity (82242) hit "TernP-
deplh rn Salinity ppt (490) Precipit-In/day (45) 112toud Cover % (32) Wind Dir-Deg (36�SErm Flox' Sev (1351 Turbidity Severity (13�Wind Velocity-mphMears Sirm Depth-t'i (64) Immt 51'idt tl
s

Ili
County:
NEW HANOVER
River Basin
CPF
Report To
WIROSP
Collector:
L WILLIS
Region:
WIRO
Sample Matrix;
SURFACEWATER
Loc. Type:
LAKE
Emergency Yes/No VisitlD
COC Yes/No
Sample ID:
gyp£ Wa7'�� PbNumber#
Date Received:
Time Received:
Lehworks Loginl0
Report Generated;
Date Reported:
AB61078
10 W 5852
07/2012010
08AS
SMATHIS
7128110
D71281201 D
Loc. Descr.: MEISE POND
Location 10: WIROSPNLC Collect Date: 0711612010 Collect Time: %35 Sample Depth 0.1
CAS # Analyte NameL
Result/ Units Method Analysis Validated by
Qualifier Reference Date
LAB
Sample temperature at receipt by lab
1.2
°C
7120110
SMATHIS
NUT
NH3 as N in liquid
0.02
0.02 U
mg1L as N
Lac10.107-06-1-J
7/21/10
CGREEN
Tota4 KjeldaW N as N in liquid
. 0.2
1.2
mg1L as N
Lachat107-06-2-H
7123/10
CGREEN
NO2*NO3 as N in liquid
0.02
0.02 U
mg1L as N
Loci 0-107-04-1-c
7/21/10
CGREEN
Phosphorus total as P in liquid
0,02
0.81
mgILas P
Loci 0-115-01-1EF
7/21110
CGREEN
Laboratory Seetion}> 1623 Mail Sarvlco Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1623 [phone]
For a delalled desWp!ion o11he quemer c"w reler to ptyi!'?f'YJ.hIL[.ISn1.SAf,A'9'1.Y.?.4AY.Mii6?253B.1f!I'.1.4fisA.C.�.L}j LN a ugillier �nAnv <hlln:f/p5!ngLpf61e1Sf pn�k+et5!1+tJVJh , 1ntQ(rr {t yj
Page 1 of 1

COUNTY, itu�
RIVER BAsm t
REZOi4TTO; WIV2—x,
SHIPPED BY: Courier
COLLECTOR(S) :_
Estimated BOD Range:
Seed:
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - LAB FORIM
SANIPI.E TYPE
PRIORITY
AMBIEN r F-1 QA a 36 STREAM ❑ EFFLUENT
El COMPLIANCE Q CHAIN OF CUSTODY LAKE EDINFLUt-.NT
EMERGENCY ESYEC1a1. STUDY ESTUARY r
10 Co+n Pain{ visit roC� 1J
Station Localion; Y T��4�''E`. ID�Y�,✓
Chlorinated: Retoark5:
Lab NumbyO„
Date ReceivAiv
Time Received:
Received By:
Station #
Date Begin (yv/mmldd)
i� cn nl ko'
Date End (yy/mm/dd)
Sb 10-111, LF
Time Begin Time End
i035 103)
Depth - DtiI, DB, BB,Nl
0-1
Value Type - A, H, L
Composite-T, 5, B
Sample'
BOD 310 mg/L
Chloride 940 mg/L
}C
NH3 as N 610 mg/L
Li- Lithium 1132 ug/L
COD High 340 mg/L
Chia- 70953 µgtL
jc
TKN as N 625 mg/L
Mg- Magnesium 92' mg/L
COD Low 335 mg/L
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mQ_/L
%1n- Manganese 10` µg/L
Coliform: MF Fecal 31616 41100 mis
P: Total as P 665 mg/L
Na- Sodium 929 mg/1-
Coliform: MF Totai 31504 #/100 mis
Color: True 80 c.u.
PO4 as P 70507 rng1L
A5- Arsenic:Total 1( µg/l.
Col iform: Tube Fecal 31615 #/100 mis
Color: (pli ) 83 C.U.
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/L
Se- Selenium 1147 µg/L
Coliform_ Fecal Strep 31673 #/100 mis
Color: pH 7.6 82 C.U.
K- Potassium mg/L
Hg- Mercury 71900 pg/I_
Residue: Total 500 mg/L
Cyanidc 720 mg/L
Cd- Cadmium 1027 µg/1-
Ba- Barium pg/L
Volatile 505 mg/L
Fluoride 951 mg/L
Cr- Chromium:Total 1034 µg/L
Organochlorine Pesticides
Fixed 510 mg/L
Formaldehyde 71880 mg/L
Cu- Copper 1042 µg/L
Organophosphorus Pesticides
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/L
Grease and Oils 556 mg/L
Ni- Nickel 1067 µg/L
Volatile 335 mg/l-
Iiardness 'total 900 mg/L.
Pb- Lead 1051 pg)L
Acid Herbicides
Fixed 540 mg/1-
Specific Cond. 95 µmhos/crn2
Zn- Zinc 1092 µg/L
ph -:03 units
MBAS 38260 mg/L
V- Vanadium µg/L
Base/Neutral&-Acid Extracmh
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/L
Phcnols 32730 µ91L
Ag- Silver 1077 µg/L
TPH Diesel Range
Acidity to pH 8.3 433 mgfL
Sulfate 945 mg/L
Al- Aluminum 1105 pg/L
_
Alkalinity to pH &3 415 mg1L
Sulfide 745 mg/L
Be- Beryllium 1012 µg/L
Purgeabic Organics (VOA bo
Alkalinity to pH 4.5 410 mg/I-
Boron: Total 1022 pg/L
Ca- Calcium 916 mg/L
TPI I Gasoline Range
TUC 680 mg/L
Tannin & Lignin 32240 pg/L
Co- Cobalt 1037 µg/L
TPH/BTEX Gasoline Range
Turbidity 82079 NTU
Hexavalem Chromium 1032 µg/L
Fe- Iron 1045 µg/L
Phytoplanklbn
Coliform Total Tube 31508 W 100 mis
CONINIENTS
:
LAB USE C1YLY
Temperature
on arrival {°C}:
Sample Point % (2)
Conductance (94)
Water Tcmp-C (10)
D.O. (300)
pH (400)
8.3 Aikalinity (82244
4.5 Alkalinity (431)
4.5 Acidity (82243
8.3 Acidity (82242)
Ail remr
1
1;achi t( plh m
&aitmly ppi (480)
Precipit-lrt/day (45)
Cloud Cover % (32)
Blind Dir-Deg (36
iStrTn Flow 5ev (1351'
Turbidity Severity (13
Wind Velocity•-mphMcan
S[rm Depth-11(64)
Sam IN I(

A
rNr (DWO Laboratorv.Section Tesutts
County: NEW HANOVER Sample ID: AB61079
River Basin
Report To
CPF
WIROSP
F WA7g
a� Rp
Q
`U
PO Number
Date Received:
1OW5853
0712012010
j
��
Time Received:
08:15
Collector.
Region:
L WILLIS
WIRO
W
LebwDrXs LoginlD
SMATHIS
Report Generated;
7128110
Sample Matrix:
SURFACEWATER
Date Reported:
0712812010
Loc, Type;
RIVERISTREAM
Emergency Yes/No
VisitlD
COC Yes/No
Loc. Descr,: STRAWBERRY BRANCH
Location ID:
WIROSPNLC
Coilact Dale: 07fi612010
Collect Time: 10:40
Sample Depth 0.1
Result/
Method
Analysis
CAS # Analyte Name
P L
Units
Validated by
Qualifier
Reference
Date
LAB
Sample temperature at receipt by lab
1.2
`c
7120110
SMATHIS
NUT
NH3 as N in liquid
0.02
1.5
mglL as N
Lac10-107-06-1-4
7121/10
CGREEN
Total Kjeldahl N as N In liquid
0.2
3.5
mglL as N
Lachat107-06-2-1-1
7/23110
CGREEN
NO2+NO3 as N in liquid
0.02
0.02 U
mgi as N
Loci 0-107-04-1-c
7121/10
CGREEN
Phosphorus —total as P in liquid
0.02
0.52
mg1L as P
LaclO-115-01-1EF
7121/10
CGREEN
Laboratory Section» 1623 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699.1623 [phone]
For a delalled description of the qualifier codes refer to u r{.ygj l,1+�t4!Ir,�ryt}yq,¢/w,ni t}u5i,71}l�.(!,R,H hr_8112IkDJlI�iSl4Lv!Il{'{ Cndna • Lllnl/Miit�d-neeh�hr.one(wetVwarlelJstnflin}wlnchnsslxl+
Page 1 of 1

COUNTY :
RIVER HASON 3 Cam✓
E(E Pb wr -ro . V) t ci.•
SHIPPED BV : Courier
COLLECTOR(Sf : _W Itl.
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY - LAB FORM
PRIORFry 3
AMBIENT 0 QA
{J COMPLIANCE D CHAIN OF CUSTODY
0 EMERGENCY CECIAI-STUDY
IM Comrjoin{- Visit11)
Estimated BOD Range: Station Location:
Sced: Chlorin2ted: Remarks:
LV`c3
Lab Number
SAMPLE TYPE Date C:eceive
Time Receives! :
-STREAM ❑ EFFLUENT Received By
LAKE INFLUENT
ESTUARY Data Released:
Date Reported -
Station Fl
Date Begin (yy/mm/dd)
(L'1C),l�(�
Date End (yy/mm/dd)
161Q-111CF
Time Begin Time End
10LA0
Depth - DNI, DS, DHINI
0.l
Value Type - A,11, L
I
Composite-T, S, N Sample'!
I z
BOD 310 mg/L
Chloride 940 mg/L
YC
NI13 as N 610 mg/L
Li- Lithium 1132 ue/L
COD }sigh 340 mEIL
Chi a: 70953 pg/L
TKN as N 625 mg/L
Mg- Magnesium 92' mgll_
COD Loin 335 mg/L
NO2 plus NO3 as N 630 mg/L
Nln- Manganese 10' pg/L
Coliform: NIF Fccal 31616 #/100 rrtls
P: Total as P 665 mg/L
Na- Sodium 929 mg/l.
Col Ifomr: MF Total 31504 #/100 mis
Color: True 80 c.u-
PO4 as P 70507 mg/L
As- Arsenic: Total It µg/L.
Coliform: Tube I-ecat 31615 #/100 mis
Color: (pH ) 83 c.u.
P: Dissolved as P 666 mg/L
Se- Selenium 1147 pg/L
Coliform: Fecal Strep 31673 #1i00 MIS
Color: pH 7.6 82 c.u,
K- Potassium mg/L
lig- Mercury 71900 pg.`I_
Residue: Total 500 mg/L
i Cyanide 720 mg/L
Cd- Cadmium 1027 pg/L
Ba- Fariurn µg/L
Volatile 505 mg/L
Fluoride 951 mg/L
Cr- Chromium:Total 1034 }1 -
Organochlarinc Pesticides
Fixed 5l0 mg/L
Furmaldehyde 71890 mg1L
Cu- Copper 1042 pg/L
Organophosphorus Pesticides
Residue: Suspended 530 mg/L
Grease and Oils 356 mg/L
Ni- Nickel 1067 pg/L
Volatile 535 mg/l-
Hardness Total 900 rng'L.
Pb- Lead lost pg/L
Acid herbicides
Fred 540 mg/1-
Specific Cond. 95 µmhos/ern2
Zn- Zinc 1092 pg/L
pli 403 units
NIBAS 38260 mg1L
V- Vanadium pg/L
Base/Alcutrid&Acid Extraciab
Acidity to pH 4.5 436 mg/L
E'henols 32730 pg/i.
Ag- Silver 1077 µ811-
TPH Diesel Range
Acidity to pli 8.3 435 me/L
Sulfate 945 mg/i.
Al- Aluminum 1105 µg/l,
Alkalinity to pH 8.3 415 mg/L
Sulfide 745 mg1L
Be- Beryllium 1012 p /L
Purgeable Organics (VOA bot
Alkalinit)• to pli 4.5 410 mg/L
Boron: Total 1022 µg/L
Ca- Calcium 916 mg1L
TPI I Gasoline Range
TOC 680 mg/L
'Tannin & Lignin 32240 µg/L
Co- Cobalt 1037 Mg/L.
TPHIRTEX Gasoline Range
Turbidity 82079 NTU
Hexavalent Chromium 1032 pg/L
Fe -Iron 1045 pg/L
Fhytoplankton
Coliform'fotal Tube 31508 4/100 MIS
COMMENTS :
LAN USE ONLY
Temperature
on arrival (°C):
Sample Point % (2)
Conductance (94)
Water Temp-C (10) D.O. (300.1
p)l (4013) 83 Alkalinity (82244 4.5 Alkalinity (431) 4.5 Acidity (82243 8.3 Acidity (82242) Air. fernr.
such1 deplh m
Salinity ppi (490)
Precipit-In/day (45) Cloud Cover % (32)
Wind Dir-Deg (36 Start Flow Sev (1351 Turbidity Severity (l3 Wind Velocity-mp Mean Strni [)epth-R (64) Stan Wic
m

�� ® Kittt %Horn
f� and Associates, Inc.
Memorandum
To: Steve Whitt, Horace Willson
Martin Marietta Materials
From: Chad Evenhouse, PWS
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc
Date: August 5, 2010
Subject: Observations of Strawberry Branch hydrology data from hydrologic
monitoring program at the Rocky Point Quarry.
Background
This memorandum is prepared to provide observations of the hydrology of
Strawberry Branch within the Martin Marietta Materials (MMM) property using
available data collected as part of Rocky Point Hydrologic Monitoring Plan. The
Monitoring Plan has been implemented since 2002 per the quarry's NPDES permit
and has been useful in demonstrating that the operations at the MMM site have not
had an adverse effect on hydrologic conditions of adjacent wetland and stream
systems.
In early 2010, MMM began construction activities to reclaim a portion of the mine
pit in the northern portion of the site. This included a dike internal to the pit and
outlet spillway to Strawberry Branch that would allow water levels to rise
establishing the lake in this portion of the site. Once reclaimed, it is intended that the
dewatering discharge location at Strawberry Branch (Outfall 002) would be
abandoned (see Figure 1).
With completion of outlet structure, grading, and dike in the reclaimed area in April
2010, the discharge to Strawberry Branch was discontinued on May 12, 2010. Since
then, MMM staff at the quarry has observed water level in this reclaimed portion of
the pit has been raising an average of 1.2 inches per day.
In July 2010, MMM received notice from the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality (NCDWQ) that a downstream property owner, Ms. Andrea Meisse, had
contacted them with a concern that Strawberry Branch was dry at her property. The
Meisse property is adjacent to the MMM property east of the mine. Her concern was
that she was not able to pump water from Strawberry Branch which she has done in
the past to maintain water levels of landscaped ponds on her property.
At MMM's request, Kimley-l-lorn and Associates, Inc (KHA) reviewed the available
hydrologic data and site photographs for Strawberry Branch to evaluate the
hydrologic conditions of Strawberry Branch at the MMM property boundary.
n
TFL 972-770-1300
FAX [phone]
0
P.O. Box 33068
Raleigh, North Carolina
27636-3066

Lr
;g
JP it" A .5
Xj
yt
V., 29-A
N

Observations — Hydrologic Data
Figure 2 is a graph showing the shallow water table monitoring data for Location 8 (Strawberry Branch
floodplain) from January 2008 through July 21, 2010. Since the discharge to Outfall 002 was discontinued on
May 12, 2010, the areas shaded on the figure show the preceding (light blue) and following (light purple) 45
days from May 12 of each year to provide a comparison of rainfall and water table levels for those periods
over the past three years.
The cumulative rainfall prior to the discontinued discharge at 002 was significantly less in 2010 (2.20 inches)
than for the same periods in 2008 (6.5 inches) and 2009 (5.35 inches). So the timing of the discontinued
discharge occurred at the beginning of the 2010 growing season which had received significantly less rainfall
for that period than previous years.
The rainfall for the 45 days after May 12 was higher in 2010, similar to 2009. 2008 was significantly dry
(peak of the growing season) for that period.
Looking at 2010 rainfall and the response in the Strawberry Branch floodplain water table monitored near the
Meisse property, the lack of rainfall prior to May 12 corresponds to a water table drawdown that was occurring
before the discharge from the mine was turned off. The historical data for this monitoring location shows that
with the mine dewatering discharge, the water table is typically maintained at or above the surface. However,
even with the discharge, the floodplain water table would drawdown daring drought periods as seen in the
2008 shown in Figure 2.
After the dewatering discharge was turned off on May 12, 2010, with significant rainfall during the next few
weeks, the water table in the Strawberry Branch floodplain responded to these rainfall events even without the
mine discharge.
Therefore, it is observed from the site hydrology data that Strawberry Branch experienced a significant city
period at the same time that the reclaimed area of the mine was beginning to recharge. When the discharge
was discontinued on May 12, 2010, Strawberry Branch likely did dry up as an intermittent streani/wetland
system as a combination of the discontinued discharge and climatic factors. However, it may be that the
natural hydrodynamic for this portion of Strawberry Branch is to be an intermittently dry during significant dry
periods.
MMM reconnected the discharge to Strawberry Branch on July 21, 2010 to continue hydration of this system
while the reclaimed pit continues to recharge.
Observations — Site Reconnaissance
In addition to the observations of the hydrologic data for Strawberry Branch, MMM collected the following
site photographs to characterize the conditions of Strawberry Branch in July 2010. Refer to Figure 3 for
photograph locations.
The photographs show that the headwater area of Strawberry Branch was dry due to the recent lack of rainfall
(Photo 3), and although the discharge to Strawberry Branch had been stopped, the beaver impoundment area
just below the outfall still had some ponded surface water (Photo 2). This impoundment area upstream from
the Meisse property also likely contributed to the lack of flow downstream.
The photos also show that Strawberry Branch near the Meisse property and the eastern boundary of the MMM
property contained some water within pool features of the channel bed but did not have visible flow. This is
consistent with the water level data from the monitoring gage discussed above.
Conclusions
Surface water now in Strawberry Branch will likely experience intermittent flow during peak growing season
and/or during significant droughts under natural conditions once the dewatering discharge is permanently

stopped, The beaver impoundments upstream will also influence downstream flows under low -flow
conditions. The hydrologic data indicates that the Strawberry Branch stream -wetland floodplain system will
continue to function as a headwater swamp. However, fluctuations of stream flow and floodplain water table
elevations will more naturally correspond to the climatic conditions, and will not be sustained as they were
with the mine discharge.
The recharge to the reclaimed portion of the pit will likely continue to have some influence on the hydrology
of Strawberry Branch, so it may be beneficial to continue discharge to this location, as needed, until the
dormant season.
4

Figure 2: Rainfall and Shallow Water Table Level in the Strawberry Branch Floodplain Wetland Monitoring Location 2008-2010
-IT
800
6 00
2.00
Ili
Location 8 - Shallow Water Table Gage
(Strawberry Branch floodplain wetland)
January 1, 2008 - July 21, 2010
Water bevel —in-- Ground Surface +USAGE Wetland Criteria - ■ Monitoring Depth s Rainfall
�j fp�
0
ivr
_
_
_
_
_
__
_.
The dischargeto Strawberry Branch
(Outfall 002) was discontinued on
May 12, 2010.
Cum mulative rainfall for the 45 days
-
-
- - -
priorto 5/12/2010 was 2.20 inches.
The monitoring gage was
Cummulative rainfall for the same
replaced and relocated
45-day periods in 2008 and 2009
accounting forthe change in
were 6.50 and 5.35 inches
ground surrface elevation (+1.1
respectively.
feet) shown in the graph.
Cum mulative rainfall for the 45 days
after 5112/2010 was 8.65 inches.
Cummulative rainfall for the same
-- - --
45-day periods in 2008 and 2009
were 2.69 and 8.61 inches
respectively.
00 00 CO 00 00 co Co co Oo c0 Oo c0 Co 00 O aZ Cr) 0) (J) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) O O C) O O O CO O
CD O O CD O O O O O O O O CD O CD O CD O O CD CD O O O O CD
_O
0) CD �f7 CV M ((D ct r 0000 Co CO � CD CO C M 00 O 0000 l) M
r O CDf� t�i CV 0-)M1 it N CD N- � '�
CD N (N N N N O O O O 07e) N N N N =- O Or O O N N N N (N
CV �t Lf) CD r`- 00 0) O (N C`! r CA CO -T LO CO r- CO C) O r Ceti! (N r C N V ) LQ t0 r"-
r r CO r
O CD O O O O O O O O r r r r CD O O CD O O O O O r r r t- O O O C> O O CD
Date
0.00
1.00
2.00
300
4.00
5.00
6.00
L
7.00 =
8.00 iv
c
9 00
10.00
11.00
12.00
1300
14.00
15.00
5

>
-Ot
A.
L
L 5
.41
4M Aerial
Ij 0- Photoo.raph Locations

Photo I:
Photo 2:
the discharge to 002 had been discontinued.
is influenced by beaver impoundments.
onth after
location

Photo 3: North view looking upstream at Strawherry Brunch rnccrr it crosses Rehecca Kennedy Road north of the
reclaimed mine area taken on July 20, 2010.
Photo 4:
of the MMM property taken July 21. 2010.
boundary

Photo 5:
r from the
stream to maintain aesthetic ponds on the property, taken July 21, 2010. There is water in the channel, however
levels are significantly lower than when the mine was discharging to this location.
Photo6. Strawberry Branch downstream from the Meisse property taken July 21. 2010.

Photo 7.
Photo 8:
her?y Branch a1 the .same location as shown in Photo
mine wars re -initialed.
discharge from the pit to Strowherry Branch was re -initiated.
from the
after the
10

11

❑�❑ Kimley-Horn
and Associates, Inc.
Memorandum
To: Steve Whitt, Horace Willson
Martin Marietta Materials
From: Chad Evenhouse, PWS
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc
Date: August 5, 2010
Subject: Observations of Strawberry Branch hydrology data from hydrologic
monitoring program at the Rocky Point Quarry.
Background
This memorandum is prepared to provide observations of the hydrology of
Strawberry Branch within the Martin Marietta Materials (MMM) property using
available data collected as part of Rocky Point Hydrologic Monitoring Plan. The
Monitoring Plan has been implemented since 2002 per the quarry's NPDES permit
and has been useful in demonstrating that the operations at the MMM site have not
had an adverse effect on hydrologic conditions of adjacent wetland and stream
systems.
In early 2010, MMM began construction activities to reclaim a portion of the mine
pit in the northern portion of the site. This included a dike internal to the pit and
outlet spillway to Strawberry Branch that would allow water levels to rise
establishing the lake in this portion of the site. Once reclaimed, it is intended that the
dewatering discharge location at Strawberry Branch (Outfall 002) would be
abandoned (see Figure 1).
With completion of outlet structure, grading, and dike in the reclaimed area in April
2010, the discharge to Strawberry Branch was discontinued on May 12, 2010. Since
then, MMM staff at the quarry has observed water level in this reclaimed portion of
the pit has been raising an average of 1.2 inches per day.
In July 2010, MMM received notice from the North Carolina Division of Water
Quality (NCDWQ) that a downstream property owner, Ms. Andrea Meisse, had
contacted them with a concern that Strawberry Branch was dry at her property. The
Meisse property is adjacent to the MMM property east of the mine. Her concern was
that she was not able to pump water from Strawberry Branch which she has done in
the past to maintain water levels of landscaped ponds on her property.
At MMM's request, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc (KHA) reviewed the available
hydrologic data and site photographs for Strawberry Branch to evaluate the
hydrologic conditions of Strawberry Branch at the MMM property boundary.
•
TEL [phone]
FAX [phone]
■
P.Q. Box 33068
Raleigh, North Carolina
27636-3068

� 1
..+ram �.. .;.,��, �_ •�
!Q } l y
-. : s• _ �� _-yam•-....tom
a
t
b Y '
Fyn �.4^' f_. _ �'� • �' �
2008 Aerial Photog hLegend
t ttt ttt ,

Observations — Hydrologic Data
Figure 2 is a graph showing the shallow water table monitoring data for Location 8 (Strawberry Branch
iloodplain) from January 2008 through July 21, 2010. Since the discharge to Outfal1 002 was discontinued on
May 12, 2010, the areas shaded on the figure show the preceding (light blue) and foliowing (light purple) 45
days from May 12 of each year to provide a comparison of rainfall and water table levels for those periods
over the past three years.
The cumulative rainfall prior to the discontinued discharge at 002 was significantly less in 2010 (2.20 inches)
than for the same periods in 2008 (6.5 inches) and 2009 (5.35 inches). So the timing of the discontinued
discharge occurred at the beginning of the 2010 growing season which had received significantly less rainfall
for that period than previous years.
The rainfall for the 45 days after May 12 was higher in 2010, similar to 2009. 2008 was significantly dry
(peak of the growing season) for that period.
Looking at 2010 rainfall and the response in the Strawberry Branch iloodplain water table monitored near the
Meisse property, the lack of rainfall prior to May 12 corresponds to a water table drawdown that was occurring
before the discharge from the mine was turned off. The historical data for this monitoring location shows that
with the mine dewatering discharge, the water table is typically maintained at or above the surface. However,
even with the discharge, the iloodplain water table would drawdown during drought periods as seen in the
2008 shown in Figure 2.
After the dewatering discharge was turned off on May 12, 2010, with significant rainfall during tlae next few
weeks, the water table in the Strawberry Branch floodplain responded to these rainfall events even without the
mine discharge.
Therefore, it is observed front the site hydrology data that Strawberry Branch experienced a significant dry
period at the same time that (lie reclaimed area of the mine was beginning to recharge. When the discharge
was discontinued on May 12, 2010, Strawberry Branch likely did dry up as an intermittent stream/wetland
system as a combination of the discontinued discharge and climatic factors. However, it may be that the
natural hydrodynamic for this portion of Strawberry Branch is to be an intermittently dry during significant dry
periods.
MMM reconnected the discharge to Strawberry Branch on July 21, 2010 to continue hydration of this system
while the reclaimed pit continues to recharge.
Observations — Site Reconnaissance
In addition to the observations of tlae hydrologic data for Strawberry Branch, MMM collected the Following
site photographs to characterize the conditions of Strawberry Branch in July 2010. Refer to Figure 3 for
photograph locations.
The photographs show that the headwater area of Strawberry Branch was dry due to the recent lack of rainfall
(Photo 3), and although the discharge to Strawberry Branch had been stopped, the beaver impoundment area
just below the outfall still had some ponded surface water (Photo 2). This impoundment area upstream from
the Meisse property also likely contributed to the lack of flow downstream.
The photos also show that Strawberry Branch near the Meisse property and the eastern boundary of the MMM
property contained some water within pool features of the channel bed but did not have visible flow. This is
consistent with the water level data from the monitoring gage discussed above.
Conclusions
Surface water now in Strawberry Branch will likely experience intermittent flow during peak growing season
and/or during significant droughts tinder natural conditions once the dewatering discharge is permanently

stopped. The beaver impoundments upstream will also influence downstream flows under low -flow
conditions. The hydrologic data indicates that the Strawberry Branch stream -wetland floodplain system will
continue to Function as a headwater swamp. However, fluctuations of stream flow and floodplain water table
elevations will more naturally correspond to the climatic conditions, and will not be sustained as they were
with the mine discharge.
The recharge to the reclaimed portion of the pit will likely continue to have soine influence on the hydrology
of Strawberry Branch, so it may be beneflciai to continue discharge to this location, as needed, until the
dormant season.

Figure 2: Rainfall and Shallow Water Table Level in the Strawberry Branch Floodplain Wetland Monitoring Location 2008-2010
M
J
0
4.00
U.
W
2:00
RM
Location 8 - Shallow Water Table Gage
(Strawberry Branch floodplain wetland}
January 1; 2008 - July 21, 2010
UVater Level Ground Surface - USACE Wetland Criteria --st— Monitoring Depth # Rainfall
I
i
f
1
f
1
I
i
k
i
f
l
kr
Thy ' discharge to 'Sfrawbe­rry Branch
,.
r
:(Ou,tfall 002);was discontinued on
r
',M'ay.12;;2010:
-Cummuiative:rainfail for -the 457days
—
-
pri on to 5112/2010 :was .2O j n ' hbs„
The monitoring gage was
GUmmulat€ve rainfall'fortfie same,
repIad6d,and,re.located
45-day periods in 2o08'andw2009
accaunting fortfie change ih
were 6..50 and'5 31 inches
!
.ground drr-face;eievation'� -TA
_. Fespect,lvel'Y.,. —
feet) sl�bin i'n the g(aph.
'Cum mulative'rainfall for'fhe 453tlays
a''ftert/1`2l2010'was'8 65,inchgs,.
Cummulative`rainfall;fiorthe same,
45=da�J periods in an 2009`
ere2,89and;8_;6 E;0cles
i
_ ,res�ectiv.e(y.
i
00
00
W
m
w
CO
00
00
00
co
00
00
00
ca
0)
0)
'm
a)
a)
0)
U),
rn
a)
M
a)
rn
to
C7
O
O
-O
.O
O
o
C�
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
p
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
C�
O
V-
,
�-
T
r
00
O
M
' CU
M
M
C D
CO
crS
r^
O
Oi
N
Cti
C"V
lr)
C V
N
N
C3
N
P •
-
Lt)
f
CV
-
CTi
O
O
CD
N
CDc
O
">
r�
N
Zt
N
,I'
N
T-
Ct!
t'
7t
r
77
Ca
O
(+)
O
c-
O
(N
N
N
N
N
r
to
-
N
W)
(O
r-
00
C�
O
e-
N
N
-
N
M
In
(D
r-
CO
O
CDr'
N
r
N
M
(D
�--
O.
_CD D
c*?
C)
d
C)
O
O
CD
CD
C D
v
+-
r'
CD
O
7C)
O
O
CD
_
O
(D
O
r
c--
c
' C:) *
O
O
O
O
O
O
Date
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6:00
7.00 =
.8:00 w
9:00
10.00.
11.0.0
12.00
13.00
14.00
15.00

s a•ryK" 7�� s i � y } _ i i ri � � �i�,4'y �« k fs" � . � � f ' Lr r ��' ,. .^, � a
r{%rt,��
- n r ' t Yr� •t C,
�4 !"'�yt � :: �7r ` a n." �.�' �3 Y+�^ ��i�r� �,��''�' Jro }• � v,"?f .n �` e
w t+ '8 5yyi' O ,.
"D(�-,Vt CF�l1. '�r ,F + s {' •,'..� �; { : v'�a �� rj v{ k.:
�w1 F �+�,� Ars'�I,Y"k r ���� ��.+4 !i �jt .^�'�� 'U ;i3'��.i3'�r `+s:��•�ti � r ��(' r� � `,�' ., T' 1L� �L4 iw'
y?n„�-,�•.i �i's,r�s/'( ?.J `{�'1'F1k.T.:.� ,�5,,� �Jrf a 4,,yf�f.�r_'y,Vrcn �'^1.!? '� 4 _ etc r ,r• .
,t 'a.3 4a). a �3_f�''S�is�� :: .. 1 r.a .. �'�-'+. � •'}I�4r .=�a�� e.. E� N..°i� L. . � � �51/y
41
µ. i•t ���. _ u �"•x'�fj{"^' iJ.`! StL.4 4I` �F•yj
M�*

Y�--.�..', r r�a�• ,\'Y•'�
WAN
`� r"� �rV•i�' ,� � . t ' r.,w �'� r .�� � Alt 7# $ a1 � �.
' "•`5: `j/"+ ri'�r `ice'
5 � f
e�- r vj.,.v 4'.v� s ram. T \ as � _ • \ t 1't ... x.
401,
Eo
r
- .. i [iP r Cx �i ''.l`i '' A *''ai rr� X'` ly.n' f Nh •�i � � � t.1�� a f; §t - }::j r 7 `t`!+ ��
u r,- s •r�'l �. pYh7? - �'94 K "r; -i7 i�-..'' fi��f;*'R "•t,
Jh
- -•,, �'� �'� s r J , ; c. M„ s, }
ffll
r a''f �' r 4 w�.• _ _ � iS.�it'�
-� r F rt ati
. a _:�tL:�'+� '"• `. )^ �X, s � .. 5 _': n f ��a.S .4 �. .`.+ �ts+�L��.� .:�'esew�
�Sr' � - k��! � "� c�lVr*�u� �,�y 3� j�� �..4 -mod `qst{ F, ,S `_ : •.
a � r j� ¢ ^�"a � W ''�YLs•i1�3,� t;Sid' 13f,"s � ,i
71
�y d —clot

�. •� `'AFC Y�1,. � 1Q1Q�� ���.,`*.'(4ly`kI!:' �.� ��
1±f�hIle�
-11 �. '. a • 1 A a 1 � Sal 6 .A, yl, rl i� . ',^f!'it'!
IF
'ham �./ � ♦ a �� �, � rS� �� {wy,ik'�� �_ + :'� � a �
1 I r _ f 4k3..i �•�- ,l .eye � �!
t ti♦ y � w l .a "ILy '.
iii �rr f �. ,���, �.; • � �.
�a • yr
�+ u
1 Fir.•\} •fir F'kn
1''.1Y. hs; i'A'-nr.'s- ._ 4 • `. �_l7" .�,: a?....a�s.y.r.. , - t��, . elf
s
'A
J

�'I h n.. ' +a'� •LiX •..5 b p,a-{n«[r¢� 1W'"�
%:S p�, � F '� : -.�� ..a. ',i •• a o-iM sa" .i
. , t � � ��y, �'� t6• ' \ ,fl.Or` , r rs � +t t ,.- � �1 ' r • a ''
,I•Iji ��,',l 4 �r 1 'do- �'lli+i a��n -+ � V� • t r• •ha � LY `�r� NW,
ly�� 1'1
•..nf yy - ` f ti•.yr "ri . iV ya,
< �'
�W+�'
•1 .h b �� ,�.,. r�+,N:^:f t � � -y� 7,. . RIP
�M1lE+e
u ; 1 1 w '. r !� i i ' JY ! r��� l,. •:9 [i � tt 'S•;''ti.
♦ t
1� t � a ,.�,i���nY! �.n,llaa r r 'Pr•,�t(L N. . i 4. n.
ICA
tic� �` ai'l 1�tt+�` �ty_ .t��.:^fl•• r fat �i.�
�,. 1•�r !/!t!!v J 4 ,. r ��L r,�rl� d• �� s�sr �r �� �,�� . `•
sk"f `✓.i.if a . t�tt ,FI�{f� '�:it
!r� � may. ` _•_C. `.9' .ffJ i 1��' 4.. . Y �^'�4 �{� G �N �1}1 6' a �I
~�"'�,�. � � � �_,�{F'i �i r.. r...." it •'.li! �-st 5l'"'? :: r' ��. .11�".f,W`">"i, • . J,'. i. i'�,� , \ � i.'_, .

�l"M
ri

�.
76
CIO)
u.
.17
1
W.ly
r 2 7 >24
rn, 3
- =zAL
V •j
I �� O� Ip f

1
Year 4 Monitoring Report
MonitoringPlan
Rocky Point Quarry
Pender County, North Carolina
Prepared by:
Martin Marietta Materials
A`.,A
i.n...mo.onnoi�nmon 1 � `�
Tune 2008

Martin Marietta Materials Rocky Point Quarry: Year 4 Monitoring Report,
V �• June 2008
1.0 INTRODUCTION....................................................................................... 5
2.0 OBSERVATIONS...................................................................................... 5
2.1 Executive Summary.......................................................................................................................5
2.2 Past Monitoring Plans: .................................................................................................................. 6
2.3 Current Monitoring Plan: May 2007 — Present........................................................................... 6
TractG1..............................................................................:.............................:..... 7
Location2........................................................................................................... 7
Location5........................................................................................................... 7
Location10......................................................................................................... 8
LocationI l......................................................................................................... 8
Location12............................................................................
TractH1.........................................................
Location3........................................................................................................... 9
Location6......................................................................................................... 10
Location13....................................................................................................... 10
Location14....................................................................................................... 10
Location18.......................................................... ................. 10
TractH2............................................................................................................... l 1
Location7......................................................................................................... l 1
Location15....................................................................................................... 11
Location16....................................................................................................... 11
Location17....................................................................................................... 12
OtherLocations................................................................................................... 12
Location8......................................................................................................... 12
Location19....................................................................................................... 12
Southern Tracts (Tract D and South of Tract E)................................................. 13
Location20....................................................................................................... 13
Location21....................................................................................................... 13
Location22....................................................................................................... 13
Location23....................................................................................................... 13
Location 24......................................... .......... 14
....................................................
Location25....................................................................................................... 14
Location26....................................................................................................... 14
1t

Martin Marietta Materials
Rocky Point Quar)y: Year 4 Aonitoring Report,
Jute 2008
3.0 CONCLUSIONS..................................:...................................................14
TABLES
Table 1: Summary of Shallow Water Table Monitoring Gages Data ............................................ 17
Table 2: Summary of Deeper Aquifer Monitoring Gages Data...........:.........................................1 S
Table 3: Summary of Surface Water Level Monitoring Gage Data .............................................. 18
Table 4: Summary of Discharge Volumes..................................................................................... 19
FIGURES
Figure 1: Monitoring Gage Locations Installed May 2004
Figure 2, Southern Tracts Monitoring Gage Locations Installed May/June 2005
APPENDIX
Monthly Field Data — Events of Interest
Site Inspections & Graphs
Tract G1
Location 2 NW 21 (Overburden)
Location S NW 11 (Shallow)
Location 10 NW 15 (Shallow)
Location 11 NW 18 (Shallow)
Tract H1
Location 3
NW 8 (Surface)
NW 20 (Overburden)
Location 6
NW 6 (Shallow)
Location 13
NW 4 (Shallow)
Location 14
CEC3 (Shallow)
Location 18
CEC1 (Shallow)
NW 26 (Deep)
NW 17 (Shallow)
NW 25 (Deep)
u

Martin Marietta Materials
AA
, V ,
Traci 112
Location 7
Location 15
Location 16
Location 17
Other Locations
Location 8
Location 19
Southern Tracts
Location 20
Location 21
Location 22
Location 23
Location 24
Location 25
Location 26
Rocky Point Quarry: Year 4 Monitoring Report,
June 2008
NW 9 (Shallow)
NW 14 (Shallow)
NW 2 (Shallow)
NW 12 (Shallow)
Nei' 5 (Shailow)
NW 7 (Stream gage in Strawberry Branch)
NW 1 (Stream Cage in Ditch on Tract I )
mma5 (Shallow)
mma3 (Shallow)
mma2 (Shallow)
NW19 (Overburden)
mm4 (Deep)
NW 23 (Deep)
mm6 (Deep)
tv
NW 24 (Deep)
mm5 (Overburden)
NW 22 (Overburden)

I
Martin Marietta Maleriars Rocky Point Quarry: Year 4 Monitoring Report,
June 2008
1.0 Introduction
The Rocky Point Quarry Monitoring Plan Year4 Monitoring Report is prepared to satisfy North
Carolina Division of Water Quality (NCDWQ) requirements for Martin Marietta Materials
(MMM) to perform groundwater monitoring of adjacent tracts at the Rocky Point Quarry mine in
Pender County, North Carolina. A brief history of the evolution of the monitoring program as
' developed through coordination and input from the US Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and
NCDWQ and an outline of the methodology employed in this project are presented in sections 2.0
and 4.0, respectively, of the Rocky Point Quarry: Year 1 Monitoring Report (May 2005). The
second annual report presented an evaluation of the data from May 2005 to May 2006. The third
annual report presented an evaluation of the data fromMay 2006 to May 2007. This fourth annual
ireport presents an evaluation of the data from April 2007 to April 2008.
Conclusions of this monitoring report summarize the effectiveness of managing discharge from
the dewatering operation of the mine to maintain surticial groundwater supply supporting
adjacent wetland areas.
2.0 Observations
' 2.1 Executive Summa ry
The water management system is effectively hydrating the wetland areas adjacent to the mine as
the pit is being expanded per the approved 404/401 permit. The water management system has
i been successful in meeting the objective of not allowing dewatering activities to negatively affect
wetland hydrology in these areas. As observed in the Year -I , Year-2 and Year -3 Monitoring
Reports, much of the avoided area (including areas which were not jurisdictional wetlands) within
tract G i has been enhanced by rehydrating the entire block and raising the local groundwater
level for the entire area. In fact, several monitoring wells located on Tracts GI, HI and well
location # 8 above Tract 1-12 are actually operating in standing water.
Additionally, based on the visual inspection of the monitoring locations, there have been no
observed occurrences of subsidence or sinkhole development throughout the study area. The
region may be susceptible to sinkhole development during drought conditions due to the geology
of the region, however this has not been observed since the monitoring at the quarry began in
2002. Photographs were taken around all monitoring well locations on April 23,2008 to document

Martin Marietta Materials ^
v
Rocky Point Quarry: Year 4 Monitoring Report,
June 2008
that no noticeable changes have occurred since this monitoring program was initiated in May .
2004.
2.2 Past Monitoring Plans:
The initial monitoring plan provided critical observations important to the development of the
modified and current monitoring plan_ The data collected throughout the initial plan provided an
understanding that the hydrology of the adjacent wetlands was not significantly influenced from
the dewatering activity, but was more likely influenced from lateral groundwater flow in the
upper surficial aquifer towards the mine wall as the mine advanced. These observations led to the
development of the current monitoring location configuration. The initial monitoring plan is
further discussed in section 5.1 of the Year I Monitoring Report.
The Year 2 Monitoring Report showed that the water management system was effectively
hydrating the wetland areas adjacent to the mine as the pit expanded per the approved 404/401
permit. As observed in the Year- I Monitoring Report, much of the avoided area (including areas
which were not jurisdictional wetlands) within tract G I had been enhanced by rehydrating the
entire block and raising the local groundwater level for the entire area.
The Year 3 Monitoring Report continues to demonstrate that the hydration effort continues to
protect adjacent wetland areas. Mining to the east towards Tracts HI and 112 is nearing
completion. All future mining will be to the south on the Plum Creek timber property.
There was no evidence from the site evaluations and monitoring program that dewatering was
having any significant effect on wetland, or surficial hydrology in the adjacent tracts.
Additionally, no observed occurrences of subsidence or sinkhole development were observed
throughout the study area.
2.3 Current Monitoring Plan: May 2007 -- Present
The monitoring gages .were installed in May 2004 and the water management system (new
discharge location, risers, and water control structure) was completed in July 2004. The data
from the GI monitoring gages clearly demonstrates that the entire area has been significantly
hydrated.

Martin Marietta Materials
v
Rocky Point Quariy Year 4 Monitoring Report,
June 2008
A copy of the monthly download log collected by MMM staff is included in the appendix along
with the monitoring gage location data. The data is grouped by tract, and each monitoring
location includes the following:
• Annual Monitoring Gage Site Inspection Form
• Water Level Data Graph
In review of the .eater level data, please note that the growing season is shown on the Shallow
Aquifer graphs shaded and that an estimate for the minimum duration to meet Corps' wetland
hydrology criteria is 12 consecutive days of saturation within the upper 12 inches of -the soil.
This represents 5% of the growing season stated in the Pender County Soil Survey. The
Following is a discussion on each monitoring location:
Tract G1
The eastern portion of Tract G I is fully encircled by the recharge trench and is nearest to the
active mine area (Figure 1). The tract contains avoided wetlands and areas that had been
converted to pine plantation. There is a depression in the center of the tract commonly referred to
as the "Gatos Hole". This area is completely under water. Mining in this direction is almost
completed. Future mining will be to the south, away from Tracts G I and 1-11.
Location 2
Location 2 contains an overburden gage (NW 21) and a deeper aquifer gage (NW 26). The
location is near the water control structure (RO) and has been inundated since the implementation
of the modified discharge design per the Modified Pumping Plan (July 2004). The gages have
been in operation since the initial monitoring plan began (2002) and demonstrate the re -hydration
of G 1, and that the design to maintain water levels in the recharge trench has been successful.
The deeper groundwater gage, NW26, shows that the area is within the cone of influence as the
water levels are well below the ground surface. Even though the gage is under water. The
overburden gage remained consistent with historical readings. We will be requesting that these
wells at Location 2 be removed from the monitoring program as they are both inundated.
Location S
Location 5 contains a shallow water table gage (NW 11) and is located in the "Gator Hole"
depression area. This gage replaced NW 10, which was installed for the initial monitoring plan
0
7

Martin Marietta Materials
�,
Rock), Point Quarry Year 4 Monitoring Report,
June 2008
and had consistent maintenance issues because the gage was consistently dry. Hydrology criteria
had not been met prior to the initiation of the pumping and water control structure. Since July
2004, the area has been re -hydrated and has a water table elevation consistently near or at the
surface, meeting Corps' wetland hydrology criteria.
Wetland hydrology criteria has been met at this location with the water level maintained within
the upper 12 inches of the soil surface throughout the 2007 growing season. The area around this
well location is normally under water or extremely wet.
Location 10
Location 10 contains a shallow water table gage (NW 15) and is in an area that has been inundated
or saturated at the surface since the implementation of the water control structure. The data
demonstrates that the water table has been sustained at or above the surface siltce pumping to the
recharge trench began in 2004, meeting Corps' wetland hydrology criteria. We will be requesting
that this well be removed from the monitoring program as it is also inundated
Location 11
Location I I is a shallow water table gage (N W 18) closest to the advancing mine. This gage was
installed adjacent to the recharge trench in an area of slightly higher elevation due to relic spoil
piles adjacent to the drainage ditch. The gage data demonstrates that during the growing season
there are brief periods where the water table is within the upper 12 inches of the soil in response
to storm events.
The duration of saturation in the upper surface does not meet the Corps' 111inimunt criteria for
wetland hydrology with only 3 consecutive days of hydration. The water table appears to be
more consistently maintained at about 1.5 to 2.0 feet below the ground surface. This is likely due
to the monitoring location being on a slight topographic high point. It is likely that this area will
only meet wetland hydrology criteria during -periods of significant rainfall during the growing
season.
Location 12
Location 12 used to contain a shallow water table gage (NW 16) located in the central area of G 1.
The well was damaged beyond repair during August 2006 by the landowner (timbering
company). We do not plan to replace this well since mining to the east will be completed in the
8

Martin Marietta Materials
w A
Rock), Point Quarry: Year 4 Monitoring Repot,
Jute 2008
near future. Well MW 1 I is almost due west and should pick up any impacts from the mining
activity.
Tract H1
Tract 1-11 is east of the recharge trench and tract G 1. The tract is predominately pine plantation
forest including beds and rows. "I'liere are areas of small depressions (location 13). However,
this area does not generally contain hydrology indicators sufficient to meet Corps' hydrology
criteria. This is likely due to the altered landscape (beds and rows) and land management
practices for timber production.
Location 3
Location 3 is located in a depression/swale that defines the boundary between H1 and 1.12. This
location contains a shallow water table gage (NW 17), an overburden gage (NW 20), a deep
aquifer gage (NW 25), and a surface water gage (NW8). This area is downslope from the water
control -structure and since July 2004 has received discharge from the rnodified pumping; plan.
The deep groundwater gage (NW 25),shows that this location is likely beyond the cone of
influence from the dewalering activity of the mine as the water levels are much more near the
surface as compared to Location 2. (NW26).
The shallow water table gage (NW 17) data demonstrates that this location has met and exceeded
Corps' wetland hydrology criteria throughout the 2007 growing season and thus far in the 2008
growing season. Water level is consistently maintained at or above the ground surface within the
drainage swale.
The overburden water gage (NW 20) remains consistent with previous data readings continuing
almost always above land surface elevation. The surface water gage (NW 8) shows that the
wetland Swale surface flow has been consistently sustained with much larger flooding events in
response to rainfall since the discharge has been redirected to this swalc. We will be requesting
that all four of these monitoring well be removed from the monitoring program as this area is
very wet. This location is well east of the recharge area and beyond the cone of influence from
the dewatering activity of the pit operation.
9

Martin Marietta Materials
A A .
.
Location is
Rocky POh7t Quarry: Year 4 Monitoring Report,
June 2008
Location 6 contains a shallow water table gage (NW6) and is located in a forested pine plantation,
including beds and rows. The location has been monitored since 2002 and has shown that water
table levels have periodically been near the surface to meet minimum Corps' criteria for wetland
hydrology during periods of significant rainfall.
A new well screen and casing was installed approximately 15 feet from the previous location and
gage NW 6 was relocated to the new casing (NW6 on May 17, 2006. Following installation, a
period of stabilization occurred through August 2006 wherein the water levels began to resume
consistency with previous monitoring. After this period, water levels began to show the
necessary wetland criteria for the year. In early 2007, this well began to malfunction. Repairs
will be made in 2008.
Location 13
Location 13 contains a shallow water table gage (NW4) and is located in a small depression area
surrounded by forested pine plantation. Some logging occurs in the nearby area. The data shows
that this.location exceeded ininimum Corp's wetland hydrology criteria with the water table
elevation within the upper surface until May of 2007. After that period, the gage has been
malfunctioning. Repairs will be made in 2008.
Location 14
Location 14 contains a shallow water table gage (CEC3) that replaces a malfunctioning well
(NW I3).which was removed from service in March 2007.
The gage data at CEC3 demonstrates that the minimum Corps' hydrology criterion at this location
was met for most of the growing season.
Location 18
Location 18 is a shallow water table gage CEC1 located in a cutover area adjacent to the forested
pine plantation.
The gage data at CECI demonstrates that the minimum Corps' hydrology criterion at this
location was not met
H

Martin Marietta Materials 1 V w A
Tract H2
Rocky Point Quarry: Year 4 Monitoring Report,
June 2008
Tract H2 is a large wet -fiat type wetland area typical of a topographic flat area between drainage
features. There is a roadside ditch along the western boundary of the tract; however, the
remainder of the tract contains natural vegetation. The area was logged at one tire, so there is
evidence of some disturbance of the soil surface; however, there is evidence of ponding and
saturation of the surface throughout the tract.
Location 7
Location 7 contains a shallow water table gage (NW9) and was installed as part of the initial
monitoring plan (2002). The data collected to date at this location shows that the water table is
above or near the surface throughout the dormant season and is maintained for longer periods of
the growing season in response to rainfall events. The data shows that this location has exceeded
Corp's wetland hydrology criteria for consecutive days of water table elevation within the upper
surface on multiple occasions in each monitored growing season. This gage went through a
malfunction period between July 2007 and February 2008.
Location 15
Location 15 contains a shallow water table gage (NW 14) and is located in a natural vegetation
area similar to Location 7. The gage was added in May 2004 to provide additional data for the
1.12 tract and is consistent with the shallow gage in Location 7. This gage does not appear to be
responding to natural conditions. Repairs are planned for 2008.
Location 16
Location ]b contains a shallow water table gage (NW2) and is located in a natural vegetation area
similar to Location 7 and Location 15. However, this gage location is more than a foot higher in
elevation than the other two locations and thus the water table appears to be lower in elevation
from the ground surface as compared to the other 1-12 gage locations. This gage does not appear to
be responding to natural conditions. Repairs are planned for 2008.

N
Martin Marietta Materials Rocky Point Quarry: Year 4 Manrlortng Report,
• �/ v Jane 2008
Location 17
Location 17 contains a shallow ,eater table gage (NW 12) and is located in a natural vegetation
area similar to Locations 7, 15, and 16. The water table dynamics are also very similar as
observed in the other H2 tract monitoring locations where the water table is maintained at or near
the surface and fluctuates in response to rainfall events.
Other Locations
Location 8 (Strawberry Branch)
Location 8 contains a shallow water table gage (NW5) and a surface water gage (NW7) in
Strawberry Branch. The shallow water table gage is located along the toe of slope of the
' floodplain, and the surface gage is located in the channelized section of the stream. The
monitoring location is downstream from a discharge outfall tronn the mine dewatering and the
' data demonstrates that water level is maintained in the stream and its floodplain consistently year
round.
The gage data at NW5 demonstrates that the minimuln Corps' hydrology criterion at this location
was met on multiple occasions throughout the 2007-growing season. We will be requesting that
both of these monitoring stations be removed from the monitoring program as they are both
normally inundated. The water gage in Strawberry Branch is surrounded by several feet of water.
tLocation 19
Location 19 contains a surface water gage (NWI) in the ditch south of the mine in tract E. This
location was added in May 2004 to monitor water levels in the ditch as it was determined to be a
jurisdictional wetland feature that had been historically channelized. At this time, the elevation
shown for the gage is relative to the channel bottom (i.e. elevation 0.00 is the bottom of the
ditch/bottom of the probe). The data demonstrates that hydrology has been maintained in the
bottom of the ditch since the monitoring period began, with a significant spike in water level in
during large rainfall events.
1 12

Martin Marietta Materiaks Rocky Point Quarry: Year 4 Monitoring Report,
- by Ane 2008
aSouthern Tracts (Tract D and South of Tract E)
The monitoring gage locations south of "Tract E and in Tract D were added in June 2005 to
observe potential dewatering influence in that direction as the mining operation moved into Tract
E in 2005-2006. Deeper aquifer and overburden gages were installed, and shallow water level
monitoring gages were installed to observe wetland hydrology in the swale drainage system
(Tract D) and floodplain/oxbow wetland feature associated with the Northeast Cape Fear River
' floodplain (south of Tract E).
Location 20
' Location 20 contains a shallow water table gage (ntma5) located south of Tract E slightly upslope
from an oxbow wetland feature associated with the Northeast Cape Fear River floodplain. .
Location 21
Location 21 contains a shallow water table gage (tnma3) located south of tract E within the
' oxbow wetland feature associated with the Northeast Cape Fear River floodplain.
BLocation 22
Location 22 contains a shallow water table gage (mma2) located south of tract E within the
oxbow wetland feature associated with the Northeast Cape Fear River floodplain.
Location 23
Location 23 contains an overburden gage (NW 19) and a deep groundwater gage (NW 24)
adjacent to and slightly upslope from a jurisdictional wetland and drainage swale (approximately
6 feet in elevation). The deeper gages were installed to determine the potential advancement of a
cone of depression as the mine advances southward.
The overburden a e at Location 23 demonstrates that dewaterin activities have not ne ativel
gg b E y
influenced surficial hydrology, and wetland hydrology of adjacent wetlands is likely at or near the
surface. This location will continue to be evaluated periodically over the upcoming growing
season for proper function and for deep aquifer impacts in this area.
1 13

Martin Marietta Materials A Rocky Point Quarry: Year 4 Monitoring Report,
1 �V` .hone 2008
Location 24
Location 24 contains a deep groundwater gage (mm4) and an overburden gage (mm5) located in
a roadside field edge adjacent to a forested pine plantation. The gages are monitored to evaluate
potential cone of influence from mining activities as the mine advances in comparison with
Bmonitoring Location 23. Since the gages were installed, it appears that mining activities have not
negatively influenced surficial hydrology.
Location 25
Location 25 contains an overburden gage (NW 22) and a deep groundwater gage (NW 23)
adjacent to a slightly upslope from a jurisdictional wetland.
The overburden gage (NW 22) shows that hydrology is likely at or near the surface in the
adjacent wetland assuming an elevation difference of approximately six feet, and the
advancement of the mine has not negatively influenced surficial (wetland) hydrology adjacent to
this area.
Location 26
Location 26 contains a deep groundwater gage (min 6) located at the end of a forest road. The
overburden gage was not installed at this location due to the depth of the roadside drainage
ditches (-12 feet) in this area.
The gage is evaluated to provide cone of influence information as the mine advances and no
wetlands are adjacent to the location. Since its installation, the data has continued to show that
the advancement of the mine is not negatively influencing surficial hydrology in this area.
3.0 Conclusions
The water management system is effectively hydrating the wetland areas adjacent to the mine as
the pit is being expanded per the approved 404/401 permit. The water management system has
been successful in meeting the objective of not allowing dewatering activities to negatively affect
wetland hydrology in these areas. As observed in the Year-1, Year-2 and Year —3 Monitoring
Reports, much of the avoided area (including areas which were not jurisdictional wetlands) within
tract G 1 has been enhanced by rehydrating the entire block and raising the local groundwater
level for the entire area.
14

I
L
Martin Marietta Materials
A A
\/
Rocky Point Quarry. Year 4 Monitoring Report,
.June 2008
The recharge trench is continuous and separates tracts H 1 and F12 from the active mine, while
fully encircling the remainder of tract G 1. Of particular interest to NCDWQ during discussions
regarding the design of the recharge trench/hydrologic barrier, was hydrating the depressional
area in the interior of tract Gl (Location 5, often referred to as the "Galor Hole"). Since July
2004, the area has been re -hydrated and has established a water table elevation consistently near
or at the surface, meeting Corps' wetland hydrology criteria.
Table I contains a summary of the shallow water table gage data regarding Corps' wetland
hydrology criteria. In summary, the water management design of the Pumping Plan has
demonstrated to be effective in inailltaining surficial hydrology within the study area. There is no
evidence from the site evaluations and monitoring program that dewatering is having any
significant effect on wetland, or surficial hydrology in the adjacent tracts.
Table 2 contains a summary of the deeper aquifer. In summary, these wells continue to be
monitored along with the shallow water table gages. The focus on the data from these wells is to
observe whether the cone of depression advances as the Aline advances eastward. Location 3
continues to appear to be beyond the cone of influence of the current mine exhibited increase
water levels within the last year. The Southern Tracts deeper aquifer gages show the baseline
condition of the mine prior to advancement southward and that there is no noticeable change in
the deeper aquifer data with the additional slot in Tract E constructed in early 2006.
Table 3 contains a summary of the surface water level gages. Location 19 is a drainage ditch
south of the active mine in Tract E that has demonstrated to be hydrated throughout the entire
monitoring period to date. Note that the elevation shown for this gage is relative to the bottom of
the ditch and is not tied to an actual elevation at this time and that the culvert outlet likely
maintains the elevation of water level in the ditch.
Table 4 shows the estimated discharge from the dewatering activities at the mine pet- the
approved Modified Pumping Plan. As documented in the Year -I Monitoring Report, the re -
hydration volume is an estimate of the amount of water utilized to re -hydrate the remainder of
tract G 1 and/or was returned back to the mine through seepage from the recharge trench. The
significant volume of water being utilized, along with the demonstrated wetland hydrology at the
monitoring locations, indicate that the pumping plan and recharge trench have been effective in
protecting adjacent wetlands from the hydraulic impact caused by dewatering.
15

Martin Marietta Materials
ww
--- .y �.
RocAy Point Quarry: Year 4 Monitoring Report,
June 2008
The amount of water used to re -hydrate the area is figured at 0.60 MGD based on data collected
from the 2"d. quarter of 2007 to the end of the I". quarter of 2008.
Based on the visual inspection of the monitoring locations, there have been no observed
occurrences of subsidence or sinkhole development throughout the study area. The region may
be susceptible to sinkhole development during drought conditions due to the geology of the
region, however this has not been observed since the monitoring at the quarry began in 2002.
16

No ® ® �m ® M M M ® IM M IM O M � ® m
Martin Marietta Materials Rocky Point Quarry: Yew-4 Monitoring Report, June 2008
Table 1: Sumntar7 of Shallow Water Table Monitoring Gages Data
ShaII!raterTTa 9 1,1 MF,—NTin Ga es, Year,-4
Tract
Location
ID
Type
Meets
Minimum
Criteria "
Notes
G1
5
NW11
Shallow
Yes
Water level consistently at or near the surface since implementation of pumping plan in July 2004 -
G1
10
NW 15
Shallow
Yes
The water table has been sustained at or above land surface since trench pumping began in 2004.
G1
11
NW 18
Shallow
No
The area appears to he significantly re -hydrated and responds to rainfall. Gage on topographic high point
H1
3
NW 17
Shallow
Yes
Wetiand criteria consistently met throughout the growing season .
H1
6
NW 6
Shallow
NIA
Gage malfunction. To be repaired in 2008.
HI
13
NW 4
Shallow
NIA
Gage malfunction To be repaired in 2008.
H1
14
CEC3
Shallow
Yes
CEC3 met wetland criteria_
H1
18
CEC1
Shallow
No
Did not demonstrate minimum Corps' hydrology criterion. Location will continue to be monitored closely. And checked for repairs
H2
7
NW 9
Shallow
Yes
Gage not functioning between July '07 and February '08. Now functioning properly.
H2
15
NW 14
Shallow
Yes
Water level spiking during large rainfall events
H2
16
NW 2
Shallow
NIA
Not functioning properly. To be repaired in 2008.
H2
17
NW 12
Shallow
Yes
Water level consistently at or near the surface, maintained during growing season by rainfall
Other
8
NW 5
Shallow
Yes
Location is adjacent to Strawberry Branch, North of Tract H2, and is inundated most of the year
Southern
20
MMA5
Shallow
NIA u
, .ir.,
MiViA1'was replaced on�lkay172006 {IUIM45)�The-gage Is-readrng'data inaccurately+:Gage,will be:reglaced.or:repat(edjin►2t1089 -
,_4;> • �G.s .
Southern
Tracts
21
MMA3
Shallow
N1A
' + '-6rttiEr
Gage working part of the�.ti Neet� ds too ie,palred" r c rr
Southern
22
MMA2
Shallow
N1A
��T�� 1�17
Gage reading belaw,botiomTaf casing Will,be adjusted in 2008:
" - Minimum Wetland Criteria is defined by the Army Corps of Engineers as the upper 12 inches of soil must be saturated for 5% of the growing season (12 consecutive days)
Pender County growing season ranges from March 17 through November 15 (242 days) and is defined by NRCS as temperatures 280E or higher with a 50% probability
U

1 s ■w ® r ® e ® ® ® ® � ass M _ a � ■as sass:® a
N artin Marietta Materials
AAAA
Table 2: Summary of Deeper Aquifer Monitoring Gages Data
Rocky Point Quarry: } ear4 Monitoring Report, June 2008
a; DeeperA uifer. onitonn Gages.,ra
11 le
Tract
Location
ID
Type
Notes
G1
2
NW 21
v/
Overburden
Within cone of influence of dewatering activities
G1
2
NW 26
Deep
Within cone of influence of dewatering activities
H1
3
NW 20
✓
Overburden
Beyond cone of influence from dewatering
activities
H1
3
NW 25
Deep
Beyond cone of influence from dewatering
activities
Southern
23
NW 19
Overburden
Beyond cone of influence from dewatering
activities
Southern
23
NW 24
!l
Deep
Beyond cone of influence from dewatering
activities
Southern
24
MM 5
Overburden
Beyond cone of influence from dewatering
activities
t
Southern
24
MM 4
Deep
Beyond cone of influence from dewatering
activities
11
Southern
25
NW 22
Overburden
Beyond cone of influence from dewatering
activities
!
Southern
25
NW 23
V-
Deep
Beyond cone of influence from dewatering
activities
13
Southern
26
1 MM 6
Deep
Beyond cone of influence from dewatering
activities
Table 3: Summary of Surface Water Level Monitoring Gage Data
�N mill Surface' ater,Level onit -in .Gages - -�
Tract
Location
NW
Type
Notes
H1
3
8
Surface
Water.level is maintained by discharge from dewatering activities since implementation of pumping plan (July 2004)
Other
8
7
Surface
Water level in Strawberry Branch is maintained consistently year round
Other
19
1
Surface
The data demonstrates that hydrology has been maintained in the bottom of the ditch since the monitoring period began, with a significant spike in water level in late
August to mid September 2006 due to large rainfall events. One large spike in Sept. '07,
is

1=11 1=1 � ® IMI 101111111 tI IM l 11111101 1MI IM M IM IMM I0
Martin Marietta Materials
Table 4: Summary° of Discharge Volumes
Period
Discharge Volumes
Outfall0Q,1 Qutfiall04Z
O.u'tfall003
Rehydration
Volume
2nd Quarter 2007
1.38 MGD
2.17 MGD
0.26 MGD
1.31 MGD
3rd Quarter 2007
1.91 MGD
0.14 MGD
0.29 MGD
0.64 MGD
4th Quarter 2007
1.06 MGD
0.94 MGD
0.31 MGD
0.64 MGD
1st Quarter 2008
3.11 MGD
1.97 MGD
0.30 MGD
0.60 MGD
_-
RocA3, Point Quarry: Year,; iWonitoring Report, June 2008
Notes:
1) Outfall 001 - Flow to this outfall is measured as the hours that Pump #3 and
Pump #6 are sending water south of the property to the drainage ditch system
parallel to 1-40.
2) Outfall 002 - Flow is measured as 50% of the hours from Pump #4 and all of
the hours from Pump#5 and directs flow northeast of the mine to Strawberry
Branch
3) Outfall 003 - Flow is measured as the discharge over a 60" wide sharp -
crested weir and directs flow east of the mine to the water control structure
between Tracts G1 and H11H2.
4) Re -hydration Volume - This volume is the difference between the flow sent
to Outfall 003 (50% of the flow from Pump#4) and the discharge over the weir
at Outfall 003.
19

J
L/

.r .::z

May. 27. 2008 10.48AM
No.4135 P. 2/3
Rocky Point Field Data
Events of Interest
Date
Location
Description
l �Ei�
Al rAtyG
d
pc� of
A"w,43�
MAAA3 c2m� of rd lbe.r
A1W 11 fep'VY*--4 IAuIP ,-EW-1,444_ys
iY K rP U~ qit
9'
14-A�� /1yr8rr,� 4I�S
'r r,P 12—m 4,-V,-5 04101
Gf/�
7/ai 1 u+�ias.,rr �'',�l R1 rN �+• -,✓ram
Gs1 ! feaftaj L,,jvASrs S r
Alkv
Alw _7q refoSw-d T,a�cs�
!Utz/ ! t! Nr tv D�#aJ�
.ltl
W L J i I d 1 for l� OV
`a �' 07
ial �rtb� 4�
�d✓A F!Z �`�'`'`" Gc./G/ 5
41W Z q &n t'ej,� �
r•
C7�
1
, a w� .�1 rG �N� f /Jf
�
%,
I,
/VO f-CIAP,N 1 (0,4
R1
Oe

May.27. 290$ 10:49AM
No. 4135 P. 3/3
L
P
u
1
I
a
8
Rocky Point Field Data
Events of Interest
Date
Location
Description
/
ry
�V44C(�
rc .u' JVL, d 5AM-.: ,-
P .i rtT* : �r. r y/
' 0
"VIA/ q � ,vw 17
�-

a � ® � ® ® air � ® ® ® ® ® �■ � � e

Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County Date: 04/23/2008
Annual Monitoring Gage Site Inspection Inspected by: Horace Willson
GAGE ID
NW 21
LOCATION: 2
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
1.42 "of rainfall was meastired
between 04/20/08 and 04/23/08
OBSERVATIONS:
Wells were completely
inundated
Photo Description: --60' North of Gages at Location 2
Well NW 21. is on the Right in photo.

Martin Marietta Aggregates Monitoring Location #2
Rocky Point Monitoring Plan
22.00
16.00
J
0
.a
w
Ui 10.00
4.00
-2.00
Overburden Gage: NW21
May 1, 2007 - April 30, 2008
fVW21 fElev. Ground Surface-FElev_ Bottom of Casing --*--Rai
1 �
16 56
Gage Malfindion
Gage f lalf inci ion J t
-0 56
r�
0
O
11
r-
0
C4
L-)
N
0
r
UD
r-
0
N
O
N
r -
0
M
N
ti
o
(n
r
00
ti
a
[�
[]
r-
o
c7
N
47
r-
0
r•
0
CD
r•
0
N
r
r•
0
co
M
0
O
ram-
co
C
N
at}
o
No
co
0
O
`C
Co to
0 0
a
N
0
0
0
C
a
CD
o
C3
r
r
CD
o
Q o
Date
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
10.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
15.00
Prepared By Sandra Cleveland
Date 6/20/2008 Location_ Well Data Year 4-xls

Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County
Annual Monitoring Gage Site Inspection
GAGE 1D:
LOCATION:
NW 26
0
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
1.42 " of rainfall was measured
between 04/20/08 and 04/23/08
OBSERVATIONS:
Wells were completely
inundated
Date: 04/23/2008
Inspected by: Horace Willson
Photo Description: --60' North of Gages at Location _2
Well NW 26 is on the Left in photo.

1=111 1=1 m m 111= m
Martin Marietta Aggregates Monitoring Location #2
Rocky Point Monitoring Plan
Deep Groundwater Gage: NW26 -
May 1. 2007 - April 30, 2008
NW26 f—Elev. Ground Surface #Elev. Bottom of Casing 0 Rainfall
24.00
J
CO)
0
d
LL 6.00
-12.00
14 73
� I I
i
U
-11h46
r-
ti r~
CD
CD 0
CD
{V
LO
Ln
� CD
U') CD
CD
O CD
Prepared By Sandra Cleveland
Date &201200a
I,-
o
o
0
CD 0
0
0
N
_o
CI)
M
_o
ory
!]
4
V LO
Lb
CD
CD
N
Q
N
r
O N
r
CD
r•
f—
CO
07
Q7
Or-
O
O
C]
O
r
CD
Date
LOCa:,O'
4Vea Data Year d els
0 CD
O
2 0
co CD
a00
Cn m
N
O
m
N
CO qT
T N
m
CO V
Q CD
CD
CD CD
0.00
1.00
200
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
L
7.00 c
8.00 Fu
900
10.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
15.00

Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County
Annual Monitoring Gage Site Inspection
GAGE ID: NW 11 (B)
LOCATION: 5
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
1.42 " of rainfall was measured
between 04/20/08 and 04/23/08
OBSERVATIONS;
NW 11 was removed from
Location 2 in April 2006 and
reinstalled at Location 5 as
N W 11 (B) in Dlace of NW 10
No observed change or
subsidence
Date: 04/23/2008
Inspected by: Horace Willson
Photo Description: From Reference Location to
Monitoring Gage

111111M r M M M M r M M M Ili M
Martin Marietta Aggregates cy r r� -N '
� � Monitoring Location # 5
Rocky Point Monitoring Plan
Shallow Water Table e., NW11B Gag
e., ( ) ,
May 1, 2007 - April 30, 2008
*NW11 was re -installed at Location 5, replacing NW10
NW11—W-Elev. Ground Surface --*—COE Wetland Det. Hydrology --W—Elev. Bottom of Casing �— Rainfall
N. it
3.00
cn
0
M
as
0.00
3' -3.00
I-- I� r- r- t` r-I- I --co Co coJ I` ao OD
Q C) CD 0 CD0 0 0 o
r N Ch [+') C7 C7 4 4 cb CD Z6 cD tb a a
N O N r O N — CD N_ �-' O N O Q
� (D f` I� CO �n- �-yi O N N co cri V
4 Q O O O O O — z-- r x- O O O O O O
Date
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00 c
8.00
C
9.00
10.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
1500
Prepared By: Sandra Cleveland
Date 612020DB
Location. Well Data -Year 4.a1s

Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County
Annual Monitoring Gage Site Inspection
GAGE 1D: NW 15
LOCATION: 10
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
1.42 " of rainfall was measured
between 04/20/08 and 04/23/08
OBSERVATIONS:
No observed altered landscape
Well Inundated
Date: 04/23/2008
Inspected by: Horace Willson
Photo Description: From Reference Location to
Monitoring Ga c

Martin Marietta Aggregates Monitoring Location # 10
Rocky Point Monitoring Plan
Shallow Water Table Gage: NW15
May 1, 2007 - April 30, 2008
I
NW 15-N—Elev. Ground Surface--*—COE Wetland Det. Hydrology fElev. Bottom of Casing —Rainfall
19.00
I
m
m
J
2
Q
._
11.00
0
o
a
C:)
o
0 0
[V
m
c7 co
C7
N
O
IN
e O
0
co
00 CD
o
a
o
0
o a
r
ti
ti
ti
OD
00
00
00
00
co
a o
a
o
0
0
0
o
a
a
o
�3
(p
cp
cn
c4
to
rn
O
N
4
N
OO
r
N
M
m
O �
e
0
o
a
o
0
0
Date
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
t
7.00
8.00
c
I
9,00
10.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
15.00
Prepared By: Sandra Cleveland
Datw 6202008 Localiorr. Well Data Year 4 As

Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County
Annual Monitoring Gage Site Inspection
GAGE ID: NW18
LOCATION: 11
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
1.42 " of rainfall was measured
between 04/20/08 and 04/23/08
Photo Description:
OBSERVATIONS:
No observed altered landscape
No observed subsidence
LC'kLn\...i ems, . r.
lA r ti sic",
Date: 04/23/2008
Inspected by: Horace Willson
From Reference Location to
Monitoring Gage

I• � I• � � I♦ � I♦ � � i♦ � � � � � � i♦ i•
Martin Marietta Aggregates �� Monitoring Location #11
Rocky Point Monitoring Plan ,
Shallow Water Table Gage: NW18
May 1, 2007 - April 30, 2008
�-NW 18—IF—Elev. Ground Surface --*—COE Wetland Det. Hydrology---E-Elev_ Bottorn of Casing Rainfall
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
t
7.00 c
8.00 Fv
9.0a
10.00
I
11.00
12.00
1300
14.00
15.00
Prepared By. Sandra Cleveland
Dale. 6/2012008 Location. Well Data_Year 4.AS

Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County
Annual Monitoring Gage Site Inspection
Date: 04/23/2008
Inspected by: Horace Willson
Water flowing through culvert onto Tract H i
One of several baffles in ditch carrying pit water
to hydrate area.

1
I
N
J
1

Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County Date: 04/23/2008
Annual Monitoring Gage Site Inspection Inspected by: Horace Willson
GAGE ID: NW8
LOCATION: 3
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
1.42 " of rainfall was measured
between 04/20/08 and 04/23/08
OBSERVATIONS:
Entire area well inundated
No subsidence or altered
landscape observed
Photo Description: From Reference Location to
Monitoring
Gage NW8 Not Shown

111111111111 IIIII- IIIIIIIIIII� 111111111111 IIIIIIIIIII, IIIIIIIIIII, 111111111111 IIIIIIIIII■ 111111111111 111111111111 111111111111 I_ 111111111111 IIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIII� 111111111111 IIII- III_
Martin Marietta Aggregates Monitoring Location #3
Rocky Point Monitoring Plan
J
16.00
12.00
Surface Water Level Gage: NW8
May 1, 2007 - April 30. 2008
NW8 --*—Elev. Bottom of Casing 0—Rainfall
r—
r•
r�
ti
-
r-
r- r- r-
r•
co
W
CO
00
cc CO
0 0
o
a
o
0
0
0
0 0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
OO
11f
r
O
N
0 N
-
C7
N
r
(N r
Ln U-)
CO
I,—
r+
00
)
6)
O r e—
(N
r
N
M
c'7 V
O C)
0
O
O
O
O
O
r r r—
r
CD
0
0
0
O O
Date
Prepared By Sandra Cleveland
Date: &20l2008
Location. Well Data —Year 4.xIs
0.00
1.00
2 00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
CD
7.00 c
8.00
c
9.00 m
10.00
11.00
1200
13.00
1400
1500

Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County Date: 04/23/2008
Annual Monitoring Gage Site Inspection Inspected by: Horace Willson
GAGE 1D: NW17
LOCATION: 3
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
1.42 " of rainfall was measured
between 04/20/08 and 04/23/08
OBSERVATIONS:
Entire area well inundated
No subsidence or altered
landscape observed
Photo Description: From Reference Location to
Monitoring Gage (NW not shown)

Martin Marietta Aggregates Monitoring Location #3
Rocky Point Monitoring Plan
Shallow Water Table Gage: NW17
May 1, 2007 - April 30, 2008
NW17—Elev. Ground Surface --*—COE Wetland Det. Hydrology—&—Elev. Bottom of Casing +Rainfall
17.00
J
Cn
0
M
M
12.00
0
J
M
7.00
t•
n
r`
s`
r-
r`
r`
�
r-
r,
f`
00
00
00
00
CID 00
O
o
0
0
CD
O
o
CD
a
o
o
Q
o
a
O
O
CD o
<
N
CI)
C�
c 3
i
V
LO
CD
CD
CD
cD
a5 M
CD
N
r
O
CV
b
Cif
O
N
O
N
O
N
to
In
to
to
(D
(D
r—
f`
r—
f—
n0
Cif
Cif
CD
O
r
r
N
r
r
_Y
N
C'"7
_
C'') C1'
O
Ca
CJ
O
�
O
O
b
r
r
r
O
O
O
O
O O
Date
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
I
6.00 y
7.00 c
8.00
w
c
9.00
10.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
15.00
Prepared By: Sandra Cleveland
Date. 61202008 Location. Well Data Year 4. x€s

Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County
Annual Monitoring Gage Site Inspection
GAGE ID:
LOCATION:
NW20
3
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
1.42 " of rainfall was measured
between 04/20/08 and 04/23/08
OBSERVATIONS:
Entire area well inundated
No subsidence or altered
landscape observed
Date: 04/23/2008
Inspected by: Horace Willson
Photo Description: From Reference Location to
Monitoriny, Gage
Well NW20 i5 on Right in photo.
Photo Description:

r r r■■r r r r r r r r r■ r■ r r■r r■r r r r r
Martin Marietta Aggregates Monitoring Location #3
Rocky Point Monitoring Plan
28.00
24.00
Cn 20.00
m
16.00
to
a�
w
LL 12.00
m
m
J
16. 8.00
f,
4.00
er
Overburden Gage: NW20
May 1, 2007 - April 30, 2008
NW20 - *-Elev. Ground Surface-FElev. Bottom of Casing t Rainfall
1
i
12 59
-2 41
-4.00
CD
ti �
o o Q
t- ti
o 0
t,
CD
r-
0
t, � r-
0 0 0
ti 00
0 0
00 CD 00 01) 00
00 00 a
r N
e— O
co co
co co
N r
�
CI)
m C7
N
�r �r LC)
r CDN
CO (O
r O
C_U
O N N �_
t j
0
Ln CD r--
O O O
Il- OD
O O
_p
61
C)
6]
O
O r
r
N
r Q
0 O O O O
Date
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
t
7.00
8.00
c
9.00
10.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
15.00
Prepared By Sandra Cleveland
{late: 6/20/2008 Location Well Data —Year 4 As

Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County
Annual Monitoring Gage Site Inspection
GAGE ID: NW25
LOCATION: 3
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
1.42 " of rainfall was measured
between 04/20/08 and 04/23/08
OBSERVATIONS:
Entire area well inundated
No subsidence or altered
landscape observed
Date: 04/23/2008
Inspected by: Horace Willson
Photo Description: From Reference Location to
Monitoring Gage
Well NW25 is on the Left in photo.
Photo Description:

Martin Marietta Aggregates Monitoring Location #3
Rocky Point Monitoring Plan
Deep Groundwater Gage: NW25
May 1, 2007 - Aprd 30, 2008
-NW25 f- Elev. Ground Surface -11F- Elev. Bottom of Casing Rainfall
20.00
10.00
m
3 -10.00
-20.00
r~ r-
r•
i~
r~
r• n r-
r-
oD
ca
CO
co
CO
ao
0
o
O
O
O
(D
O_
T
r
CV
C'7
CO
Cr)
CO
V i, 5
tD
[O
tD
CD
C7]
_O
OD
O
IN
T
p
CV
r O N
_O
r
O
N
T
O
N
T
L tI7
Cfl
r—
CO
Q)
T
N
T
T
N
M
CO
O O
O
O
O
CD
O
CD
r
T
O
O
O
O
CD
[�
Date
Prepared By Sandra Cleveland
Data_ 6/n12O08
Location: Well Data —Year 4.xls
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00 d
7.00 c
8.00
c
9.00
10.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
15.00

Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County
Annual Monitoring Gage Site Inspection
GAGE ID: NW6 (B)
LOCATION: 6
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
1.42 " of rainfall was measured
between 04/20/08 and 04/23/08
OBSERVATIONS:
Well casing replaced on
05/ 17/06
No hydrology indicators
observed
Surrounded area affected by
timbering
No subsidence or sinkholes
observed
Date: 04/23/2008
Inspected by: Horace Willson
Photo Description: From Reference Location to
Monitoring Gage
Photo Description: Shot of well can
Showing well number

Martin Marietta Aggregates Monitoring Location #6
Rocky Point Monitoring Plan
Shallow Water Table Gage: NW6 (B)
May 1, 2007 - April 30, 2008
-Well was re -installed at the same location in Year 3
f Elev. Bottom of Casing NW 6 —W— Elev. Ground Surface --*--16.00 Rainfall
6.00
3.00
J
0
,L 0.00
r— r— r` r— ti rl- I- t— r— � r- I,- CO 00 00 00 OD 00
O a o 0 O 0 CDO o O O a o 0 0 0 O o
LO co CD CD (9 00 CS> CSC
N O N O N OO N
LO U) CD r- � CO D? Ch C7
0 CD 0 O 0 O O O r O O O O O 0
Date
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
600
7.00 c
8.00 CU
9.00
!r
10.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
15.00
Prepared By Sandra Cleveland
Data 6=12008
Location, Well Data Year 4 As

Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County Date: 04/23/2008
Annual Monitoring Gage Site Inspection Inspected by: Horace Willson
GAGE ID: NW4
LOCATION: 13
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
1.42 " of rainfall was measured
between 04/20/08 and 04/23/08
OBSERVATIONS:
No hydrology indicators
observed —usually inundated
Additional timbering observed
near well
Photo Description: From Reference Location to
Monitorinp- Gaze

r llllr r rr Ir r r lillr r r Ir r Ir r r r r Ir rr
Martin Marietta Aggregates Monitoring Location #13
Rocky Point Monitoring Plan
Shallow Water Table Gage: NW4
May 9, 2O07 - April 30, 2008
NW 4 f Elev. Ground Surface —9-- COE Wetland Det. Hydrology --W— Elev. Bottom of Casing 0 Rainfall
2400
J
U) 21.00
d
O
e4
ar
d
LL 18.00
d
a
L
15 00
12.00
0
r• r`
0 0
r~
0
r~ r` r` r~ ti ti r• 00 on a0 0a 00 00
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a 0 0 0 0 0
O
N
O
(N — N t— CD N N CD N
t �
O
L0 (D
Q Q
f
CD
_O
f a0 0) 4') O <_-- r � � m co NT
CD CD CD r r r p CD CD CD CD 0
Date
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
t
7.00
8.00
9.00 m
10.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
15.00
Prepared By: Sandra Ctevelarxf
Dale: M20r,pOW Location Well Data Year 4-xl$

Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County
Annual Monitoring Gage Site Inspection
GAGE ID: CEC3
LOCATION: 14
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
1.42 " of rainfall was measured
between 04/20/08 and 04/23/08
OBSERVATIONS:
NW 13 gage replaced on
03/01/07 and replaced with
CEC3
No hydrology indicators
observed
Surrounded area affected by
timbering
No subsidence or sinkholes
observed
Date: 04/23/2008
Inspected by: Horace Willson
Photo Description: From Reference Location to
Monitoring Gage

rr � r rr r r ■■r � r � r r � � r r � ■r �
Martin Marietta Aggregates Monitoring Location #14
Rocky Point Monitoring Plan —
Shallow Water Table Gage: CEC3
May 1, 2007 - April 30, 2008
Well replaced NW13 in Year 3
CEC3 f Elev. Ground Surface f COE Wetland Det. Hydrology f Elev. Bottorn of Casing —*—Rainfall
14.00
12.00
10.00
J
d
.n 6.00
e�
.r
4.00
m
m 2.00
J
>v
0.00
-2.00
-4 00
-6.00
r—
f•
N
r�
I--
TI-
r-- I--
a
o
O
O
O
O
O o
N
c7
co
co co
O
N
O
N
O N
1�5
In
r9
r~
r~
00
07 0)
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
Prepared By Sandra Cleveland
Date. 06119=08
�
ti ti
0
0 0
I�r
ct <n
f
O N
C)
o
r
�
r r
Date
Location. Well Data -Year 4 As
ti oo
aD
ca
UJ
00 co
o O
O
O
O
O O
CEO cD
Ur
cD
c0
6> O)
O
Nco
O
N
CI)
r O
O
O
O
O O
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00 c
8.00
9.00 co
10.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
15.00

Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County
Annual Monitoring Gage Site Inspection
GAGE ID: CEC1
LOCATION: 18
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
1.42 " of rainfall was measured
between 04/20/08 and 04/23/08
OBSERVATIONS:
NW3 gage replaced on
03/01/07 and replaced with
CEC1
No hydrology indicators
observed
No subsidence or sinkholes
observed
Date: 04/23/2008
Inspected by: Horace Willson
Photo Description: From Reference Location to
Monitoring Gage,

1
rr r r r r r r■■ r Ir r r r r r r■ rr r r �■
Martin Marietta Aggregates Monitoring Location #18
Rocky Point Monitoring Plan
.m
J 3.00
-3 00
Shallow Water Table Gage CEC1
May 1. 2007 - Aprrl 30. 2008
CEC1—FElev. Ground Surface +COE Wetland Det. Hydrology --a—Elev. Bottom of Casing 4 Rainfall
I-_ t~ I` I,- I` I` i` t` ti I-- r` r~ OD 00 CC) CO 00
O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O
(O <.Q (O CO 0)
O N O (V
LO l') (0 ti f~ c6 0) m O N N co M V
O O O O O O O O r •— O O a O O O
Date
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
s
7.00 �
8.00
9.00
tr
10.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
15.00
Prepared By. Sends Cleveland
Dale. 7/9/2008 l.ocal�on. Well Dala_Year 4 xls

F
L
M
I
I

Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County
Annual Monitoring Gage Site Inspection
GAGE ID: NW9
LOCATION: 7
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
1.42 " of rainfall was measured
between 04/20/08 and 04/23/08
OBSERVATIONS:
No hydrology indicators
observed
No subsidence or sinkholes
observed
Date: 04/23/2008
Inspected by: Horace Willson
Photo Description: From Reference Location to
Monitoring Gage

Martin Marietta Aggregates Monitoring Location #7
Rocky Point Monitoring Plan
Shallow Water Table Gage: NW9
May ?, 2007 - April 30, 2008
NW9—/—Elev. Ground Surface —0 COE Wetland Det. Hydrology — —Elev. Bottom of Casing 0 Rainfall
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00 H
L
7.00 0
8.00
C
9.00
10.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
15.00
Prepared BY Sandra Cleveland
Dale: 6120/2oca Location Well Data Year 4xls

� m m

Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County
Annual Monitoring Gage Site Inspection
GAGE ID: NW 14
LOCATION: 15
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
1.42 " of rainfall was measured
between 04/20/08 and 04/23/08
OBSERVATIONS:
Area slightly inundated
No subsidence or sinkholes
observed
Date: 04/23/2008
Inspected by: Horace Willson
Photo Description: From Reference Location to
Monitoring Gage

1
1

11111= mii 11=l !•
Martin Marietta Aggregates Monitoring Location #15
Rocky Point Monitoring Plan
Shallow Water Table Gage: NW14
May 1. 2007 - April 30. 2008
NW 14 f Elev. Ground Surface f COE Wetland Det. Hydrology f Elev. Bottom of Casing 0 Rainfall
23.00
11111.r.�r�wls��aem
i� i` r-
r`
I--
r—
r—
r
r— t`
N 00
00
00
m
00
00
0 0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0 0 0
0 0
0
0
o
a
o
r � r
N
tY]
M
M
M
V � it7
CD CD
Cfl
Cfl
00
CF)
(3)
4
N
Lr) Ln CO
co
O)
0)
b
IN
co
CI -)CD
O CD
CD
CD
O
CD
CDr
r 'r—
r CDO
O
O
O
O
Date
Premed BY Sandra Cleverand
Date: WQQO08
Location Welh Dala_Year 4.xls
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
c
9.00
i
10.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
15.00

� m m

Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County
Annual Monitoring Gage Site Inspection
GAGE ID: NWz
LOCATION: 16
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
1.42 " of rainfall was measured
between 04/20/08 and 04/23/08
OBSERVATIONS:
No hydrology indicators
observed
No subsidence or sinkholes
observed
Date: 04/23/2008
Inspected by: Horace Willson
Photo Description: From Reference Location to
Monitoring Gage

it
I�

Martin Marietta Aggregates Monitoring Location #16
Rocky Point Monitoring Plan
0T m
m
O
J3
m
Ulu 21.00
W
Q
J
16.00
Shallow Water Table Gage: NW2
May 1, 2007 - April 30, 2008
NW 2 —W- Elegy. Ground Surface f COE Wetland Det. Hydrology—FElev. Bottom of Casing —0 Rainfall
4r
r F
MR
I
,A
.�
s
�
#:
r,
L v
wel'.
d
toFied
No
ta
ata
d"atr
Coll
act
au
d snc
f
��
ter'
i
I
May,
2
07
3 I
Y
10
1=�n rc 11 l r is huv11161C-r k 5
M
I-
I--
I—
I—
Imo-
n r—
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O
N
r
CD
in
LD
CD
N
ti
6�
O
O
O
O
Q
Q O
I— � I— n n 00 00 00 00 00 00
O o o a a o o O O Q O
v v Ur, cD c0 (D c0 0o a� orn
m O N N
CD r' r O O O O O O
Date
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00 i
8.00 �
9.00
10.00
11.00
12,00
13.00
14.00
15,00
Prepared By. Sandra Cleveland
Date &2012DOa
Location. WellData—Year 4.xIr

m

Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County
Annual Monitoring Gage Site Inspection
GAGE ID: NW12
LOCATION: 17
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
1.42 " of rainfall was measured
between 04/20/08 and 04/23/08
OBSERVATIONS:
No hydrology indicators
observed
No subsidence or sinkholes
observed
Date: 04/23/2008
Inspected by: Horace Willson
Photo Description: From Reference Location to
Monitoring Gam

1
1
I
I I
I I
1

rr r �■■� rr rr rr rr rrr r�■ r rr � r r ■�r rr r �■r rr
Martin Marietta Aggregates Monitoring Location #17
Rocky Point Monitoring Plan
Shallow Water Table Gage: NW12
May 1, 2007 - April 30, 2008
iVW 12 --II—Elev. Ground Surface --*—COE Wetland het. Hydrology f Elev. Bottom of Casing 0 Rainfall
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
t
7.00 c
8.00 is
c
9.00
10.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
15.00
Prepared By- Sandra ckaveland
Date. 620noW Location. Well Data_Year4.x0s

1
1
1

i
40
1
al
1
ei

Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County
Annual Monitoring Gage Site Inspection
GAGE ID:
LOCATION
NW5
8
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
1.42 " of rainfall was measured
between 04/20/08 and 04/23/08
OBSERVATIONS:
Area well inundated
No subsidence or sinkholes
observed
Batteries in need of replacing
Date: 04/23/200.8
Inspected by: Horace Willson
Photo Description: From Reference Location to
Monitoring Gage

1
Li

M
0.00
r--
CD
Q
CD
LO
O
Shallow Water Table Gage: NW5
May 9, 2007- April 30, 2008
NW5 —R— Elev. Ground Surface —0—COE Wetland Det. Hydrology --W- Elev. Bottom of Casing + Rainfall
r- r— ti t` r- r- r- r- ti r- r- co 0D ao 00 00 ao
Q O C7 O O O O O O O O `) O O Q O CD
N c7 r) 7 <� Nr N O CV O N O N O CNO 0
tf) [D ti oD M rn O N M c7 v
O O O O O O r r r r O O O G O Q
Date
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00 c
8.00 iu
w
c
9.00
10.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
15.00
Prepared By: Sandra Cleveland
Date- 061t8120 O
Location. Well Data_Year 4xls

Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County
Annual Monitoring Gage Site Inspection
GAGE ID: HW7
LOCATION: 8
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
1.42 " of rainfall was measured
between 04/20/08 and 04/23/08
0135k:ftVATIONS:
Stream gage in strawberry
branch -could not get access -too
wet
Area well inundated
Date: 04/23/2008
Inspected by: Horace Willson
Could not gain access to this well
to obtain photo. The area is too wet.
Photo Description:

11
1
ri
1
I

Martin Marietta Aggregates Monitoring Location #8
Rocky Point Monitoring Plan
12.00
Cn
m
a
LL 8 00
m
m
Q
w
m
4.00
0 0 0
r r r
O CN
to
O O O
Surface Water Level Gage: NW7
May 1, 2007 - April 30, 2008
NW7 fElev. Bottom of Casing Rainfall
I- r-- r- r- r-- r 1� r ti CO w m m ao ao
CD CD CD CD o o C) o O O O o 0 0 0
cV M M CO m ct 4 iC] (O CD cfl C0 C5 0) O
O N O N O N ` 0 N r O N
r— r- 00 O (m O r r 04 r r N CO CM CY
a o O o O r 0 o O O o 0
Date
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00 ca
w
9.00
10.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
15.00
Prepared By Sandra Gheveland
DaleW012008 Location. Well Data -Year 4 As

� m � � m � m �

Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County
Annual Monitoring Gage Site Inspection
GAGE ID: NW1
LOCATION: 19
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
1.42 " of rainfall was measured
between 04/20/08 and 04/23/08
OBSERVATIONS:
No subsidence or sinkholes
observed
Stream gage in ditch on tract
"E„
Date: 04/23/2008
Inspected by: Horace Willson
Photo Description: From Reference Location to
MonitoringGaQe

I
I
11
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

r� Illllr r r ■�■ Ir rr �■■� r i■r rr r r rr r r r r rr
Martin Marietta Aggregates Monitoring Location #19
Rocky Point Monitoring Plan
m
w
0
a
0
m
20.00
I/1
Surface Water Level Gage: NW1
May 1, 2007 - April 30, 2008
NW1 f Rainfail
#
11
NE
1
I vd
vGSEns
�
y
a
€
5
ft
ge
m
lfun
do
s:
x
LZ
Elevation of bottom of the ditch
ad
is assumed as O.DO.
r�
r`
r-
rl-
�
r-
r-
r-
I`
I-
ti
a0
00
00
OD
00 00
cc�
o
0
o
CD
a
o
C)
C)
o
o
C=)
C7
0
0
o
C) C)
N
)
C7
il-5
C°i
V
LO
CO
(D
(D
(C7
OD
O) 07
O
N
o
N
C7
(V
r-
(D
N
Q
N
a
(V t-
C)
)
(D
I—
I-r~
CA
0)C)
Q
�
T
�
0
C
0
0
CD
a
C)
0
0
T
0
0
a
o
0 0
Date
0.00
1.nn
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00 c
8.00
c
9.00
10.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
15.00
Prepared By: Sandra Cleveland
Date: 6/20/2008
Location. Well Cata-Year 4 xls

C
1
r.

al

Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County
Annual Monitoring Gage Site Inspection
GAGE ID: MMA5
LOCATION: 20
' WEATHER CONDITIONS:
' 1.42 " of rainfall was measured
between 04/20/08 and 04/23/08
1
1
'
OBSERVATIONS:
1
MM 1 replaced with gage
' MMAS on May 17, 2006
No subsidence or sinkholes
' observed
I
it
Date: 04/23/2008
Inspected by: Horace Willson
Photo Description: From Reference Location to
Monitoring Gage

r
F

Martin Marietta Aggregates Monitoring Location # 21
Rocky Point Monitoring Plan
10 00
W
> 5.00
J
L
R
Shallow Water Table Gage: MMA5
May 1, 2007 - April 30, 2008
`MMA1 was renamed MMA5
MMA5 Elev. Ground Surface 0 CCE Wetland Det Hydrology ♦ Rainfall T Elev. Bottom of Casing
0.00 F
o o 0
0 0
0 0
N
O N O_
M co
(V
M n
_
� iC] (D
O O O O
ti a0
O O
CD M
O O
Prepared By Sandra Cleveland
pate7)14r2p68
0
0 0
O
_
Q
_N
T r
Date
Location Well Oata Year 4 Xls
00
co
co
co
00 OD
o O
o
o
O
o a
co
(0
�o
co
CD M
_
N
N
M
cri
O
O
O
O
O O
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
r
7.00 c
8.00
C
9.00
10.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
15.00

I
Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County
Annual Monitoring Gage Site Inspection
GAGE ID: MMA3
LOCATION: 21
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
1.42 " of rainfall was measured
between 04/20/08 and 04/23/08
OBSERVATIONS:
No subsidence or sinkholes
observed
Well has been reporting an
"Out of Range" error since
• ApriI 2006. Martin Marietta
intends to repair or replace the
gage as needed.
Date: 04/23/2008
Inspected by: Horace Willson
Photo Description: From Reference Location to
Monitoring Ga e
Photo Description:

1
I
1

i i !R i i �■ i i i i i i i i i i i i i
Martin Marietta Aggregates Monitoring Location # 21
Rocky Point Monitoring Plan
Shallow Water Table Gage: MMA3
May 1, 2pp7 -April 30, 20Q8
r
as
m
LL
IMMA3 --0— Elev. Ground Surface f COE Wetland Det. Hydroiogy f Elev. Bottom of Casing —0 Rainfall
10 00
0.00
(• ti
O {�
O N
ifs t 7
O Q
Prepared By: Sandra Cleveland
Date: U20l2008
r N
Ci
_O
CI) C•7
r— O
N
O
tD iz:
oo m
O O
CD
O Q
O O
O
C17
_O
O r
r
Date
Location, Well Date Year 4.xls
CIO
CIO
co
O
O O_
O C)
O
(>a tD
r0
Cfl
0000
m O
r O
N_
Q
N r
N
CV
[i
M
r CD
O
C:3
O
C� Q
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00 c
8.00
S_
9.00
10.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
15.00

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County
Annual Monitoring Gage Site Inspection
GAGE ID: MMA2
LOCATION: 22
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
1.42 " of rainfall was measured
between 04/20/08 and 04/23/08
OBSERVATIONS:
No subsidence or sinkholes
observed
Date: 04/23/2008
Inspected by: Horace Willson
Photo Description: From Reference Location to
Monitoring Gage

u
11

! ! ! ! ! � ! lift i ! ! ! ! ! ! ! >•I ! !
Martin Marietta Aggregates Monitoring Location # 22
Rocky Point Monitoring Plan
Shallow Water Table Gage: MMA2
May 9, 2007 - April 30, 2008
MMA2 ---Elev. Ground Surface -0 COE Wetland Det. Hydrology
-i-Elev. Bottom of Casing
Rainfall
12.00
0.00
-
2.00
3.00
I-
4.00
i
5.00
—
-
6.00CD
v'
I
f
�
Z
I
i
r
7.00
a 7.00
i
8.00
c�
a
I
9.00
I
10.00
3
[EE {
,
'
`
�
11.00
12.00
G
C3YfIJIIJG
� ON
1 s.oa
i March
17 to Nolverhbet
�
15;
� � ":
i
j
I
3 i
--
a
14.00
aY
'
200
-
-
15.00
r-
I-
r- r- r` r- r-
n r-_ rl- rI_
ti
00
00
Co
0o
co 0
O
O
O O O O CD
d O o
O
O
(D
O
O
O O
U')
(O
CD
(_o
(D
0_0
0) 6�
O
N r O N
�T-
O
CV
r
p
ro
N
u�
0D
to
07
iD `n rl-- co 0)
CD CD CD0
0) o
CD f r c-
C
N
e-
O
O
N
0
r'l
O
M v
O O
Date
Prepared By. Sandra Cleveland
Date: 6r2o2ooe
Location: Well Data -Year 4.xls

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County Date: 04/23/2008
Annual Monitoring Gage Site Inspection Inspected by: Horace Willson
GAGE ID: NW19
LOCATION: 23
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
1.42 " of rainfall was measured
between 04/20/08 and 04/23/08
OBSERVATIONS:
No subsidence or sinkholes
observed
No hydrology indicators
observed
Photo Description: From Reference Location to
Monitoring Gage (NW] 9 to the left)
Well NW 19 is on the Left in this photo.

1
1
1
1
1

i i ! ! .'� �� ai i i i i i i ! ! ! i i i
Martin Marietta Aggregates Monitoring Location # 23
Rocky Point Monitoring Plan
40.00
10.00
j
Prepared By: Sandra Cleveland
Date. 6/20/2008
Overburden Gage: NW19
May 9, 2007 - April 30, 2008
NW19 f-Elev. Ground Surface----Elev. Bottom of Casing --*-- Rainfall
i
nd ground surface adjI
m gageis pproximaNI
,ati n. i �
rl- n
P-
1,
I-
r-
r-
�
O [7
C7
O
O
O
O
O
N t_7
[_o
M
C0
O N
O
N
O
N
ti ti
00
Qf
G)
O
O cl�
O
O
O
.-
Date
Location. Well Data -Year 4.xls
CID
0 0
0
0
0
CD C)
CD CD
CD
cD
od
m 07
�- O
N
O
N r—
N
ram,
c rr
r O
(7
O
O
O O
0.00
1.00
200
3.00
4.00
5.00
&00
7.00
8.00
9.00
10.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
15.00

� � � � � m m � � m m m � � � m � � �

Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County Date: 04/23/2008
Annual Monitoring Gage Site Inspection Inspected by: Horace Willson
GAGE ID: NW24
LOCATION: 23
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
1.42 " of rainfall was measured
between 04/20/08 and 04/23/08
OBSERVATIONS:
No subsidence or sinkholes
observed
No hydrology indicators
observed
Photo Description: From Reference Location to
Monitoring Gage (NW24 to the right)
Well NW24 is on the Right in this photo.

I
I
1

1
Martin Marietta Aggregates Monitoring Location # 23
Rocky Point Monitoring Plan
Deep Groundwater Gage: NW24
May 1, 2007 - April 30. 2008
`NW24 --M - Elev. Ground Surface --*- Elev. Bottom of Casing -�- Rainfall
33.00 jT 4
2 .58
Z 18.00
ag e rn alfu ncti n
u_
a�
a
w
J
3.00
-11.4
-12.00
cv
m
ci
CD
N
r C?
zo— 0)
Q
O
O
O
CD
Q O
Prepared By: Sandra Cleveland
Date 151 2008
0
o CD 0
CD CD
0 0
N
CD N
O
N
)
O
N r-
N
CD
r r
Q
Q CD
Date
Location: Well Data —Year 4.xls
00 00
00
CD 0
0
m
O N
■—
CD CD
0
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
r
7.00 c
8.00
w
C
9.00 M
10.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
15.00

� � � � � m � � � � � � m m � � � � m

Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County Date: 04/23/2008
Annual Monitoring Gage Site Inspection Inspected by: Horace Willson
GAGE ID: MM4
LOCATION: 24
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
1.42 " of rainfall was measured
between 04/20/08 and 04/23/08
OBSERVATIONS:
No subsidence or sinkholes
observed
No hydrology indicators
observed
Photo Description: From Reference Location to
Monitoring Gage (MM4 to the right)
Well MM4 is on the Rieht in this photo.

IJ
I
1

r r r ■�r ■� ■■■i r +� � r• ■�■ r r r r r >• r 1•
Martin Marietta Aggregates Monitoring Location # 24
Rocky Point Monitoring Plan
32.00
27.00
22.00
17.00
LL
12.00
w
y
7.00
L
2.00
-3.00
-8.00
-13.00
-18.00
Deep Groundwater Gage: MM4
May 1, 2007 - April 30, 2008
MM4 fElev. Ground Surface —E -Elev. Bottom of Casing --*--Rainfall
I- r— r-- r` r— fl- r- r— r— r- r— r- Co CO CO 00 00 00
0 0 0 0 o a a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a
ti (0 [(d cD cf) 00 O�
O N Cd N O N
Liz I O CO r-- I,- CO 63 a) O N r cal c'7 M 4
0 O O O 0 C7 C:� O r r r r p O O O CD O
Date
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
C
900
10.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
15.00
Prepared By Sandra Cleveland
Dale- W20l2D08
Location, Well Data Year 4.xls

� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � m �

Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County
Annual Monitoring Gage Site Inspection
GAGE ID: MM5
LOCATION: 24
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
1.42 " of rainfall was measured
between 04/20/08 and 04/23/08
OBSERVATIONS:
No subsidence or sinUioles
observed
No hydrology indicators
observed
Date: 04/23/2008
Inspected by: Horace Willson
Photo Description: From Reference Location to
Monitoring Gage (MM5 to the left)
Well MM5 is on the Left in this photo.

1
1
I
1
1

11110111111 111=1 1=11 ® i•
Martin Marietta Aggregates Monitoring Location # 24
Rocky Point Monitoring Plan
Overburden Gage: MM5
May 9, 2007 - April 30, 2008
MM5—fElev. Ground Surface -Allll�-Elev. Bottom of casing 0 Rainfall
30.00
25.00
20.00
LL
J
10.00
y 1 1
�
r-
t -
ram-
r-
r1
r-_
R
I--
r-
n
r-
Co
00
00
00
00
CO
(D
CD
O
C)
0
0
0
CD
O
C1
Q
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
CD
C3
C']
V
U 7
C_0
CO
Co
C3
Co
m
Cr)
2
N
O
N
r
O
N
r_
O
N
r
p
N
r
CJ
N
r
Lo
_
(9
n
t�
(b
m
0')
C0
E-
N
CV
Co
Co
�
0
o
a
CD
C)
CD
C)
o
r
o
0
o
CD
C7
0
Date
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00 U
s
7.00
8.00 r�
c
9.00
10.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
15.00
prepared By Sandra Cleve€and
Date: 6f20 G08 Location, Well Dala_Year 4 As

Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County Date: 04/23/2008
Annual Monitoring Gage Site Inspection Inspected by: Horace Willson
GAGE ID: NW22
LOCATION: 25
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
1.42 " of rainfall was measured
between 04/20/08 and 04/23/08
Photo Description: From Reference Location to
Monitoring Gage (NW 22 to the left)
OBSERVATIONS:
No subsidence or sinkholes
observed
Area slightly inundated Well NW22 is on the Left in this j2hoto.

1
I

Martin Marietta Aggregates Monitoring Location # 25
Rocky Point Monitoring Plan
3500
.4
m
m
LL
w
y 20.00
J
U
Overburden Gage: NW22
May 9, 2007 - April 30, 2008
NW22 f Eiev. Ground Surface f Elev. Bottom of Casing —* Rainfall
ti
00
0o
W
ao
Co ao
O o
a
Q
O
O
o
o
O o O
O
O
O
CD
0
0 0
1 0)
O N
O
CV
O
N
in LID
(D
ti
00
6l
O r
N
r
r
N
C_3
(
O O
p
p
CD
O
O
— r r
r
O
O
O
O
O O
Date
Prepared By Sandra Cleveladn
Dale: 6@612008
Local3on_ Well Data —Year 4xls
000
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
s
7.00
800
C
9.00
10.00
11.00
1200
13.00
14.00
15.00

Rocky Point Quarry-, Pender County Date: 04/23/2008
Annual Monitoring Gage Site Inspection Inspected by: Horace Willson
GAGE ID: NW23
LOCATION: 25
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
1.42 " of rainfall was measured
between 04/20/08 and 04/23/08
Photo Description: From Reference Location to
Monitoring Gage (NW23 to the right)
OBSERVATIONS:
No subsidence or sinkholes
observed
Area slightly inundated Well NW23 is on the Right in this photo.

1
I

1=1 11=1 1=1
Martin Marietta Aggregates Monitoring Location # 25
Rocky Point Monitoring Plan
20.00
a
LL_ 15.00
J
5.00
i M$
NW23 --W- Elev. Ground Surface --E— Elev. Boftom of Casing --#-- Rainfal]l
1��Ni� II
I I
ti rl- r-- r+ r �
0 O Q CD 0 0
r
0
r—
0
r— rI— r~ r- 00 00 oO CO ao 00
0. Q O 0 CD CD 0 CD CD _0
CO co
C3 N O N r
CO
O
m
N
q- Ltj CO CD Cfl c.4 00 0 �
O N CD CV O N
to to CD ti E` 0D
O 0 0 O 0 O
ai
O
67
CD
N N c+? M �
r [] O O O O O
Date
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00 In
r
7.00 c
8.00 is
9.00
10.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
15.00
Prepared By: Sandra Cleveland
Date 6120/2008 LocationWO Dafa_Year 4.As

Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County
Annual Monitoring Gage Site Inspection
GAGE ID:
LOCATION:
MM6
26
WEATHER CONDITIONS:
1.42 " of rainfall was measured
between 04/20/08 and 04/23/08
OBSERVATIONS:
No subsidence or sinkholes
observed
No hydrology indicators
Date: 04/23/2008
Inspected by: Horace Willson
Photo Description: From Reference Location —20 feet north of
Monitorinp, Gap -

J
1
1
1
1

w iw lillilw Iw Iw iiiiiiiw Iww liiiiiiw liiliiiw w iiiliiiw liiiiw iilllllw w wr lilliillw Iw wi w
Martin Marietta Aggregates Monitoring Location # 26
Rocky Point Monitoring Plan
Deep Groundwater Gage: MM6
May 1, 2007 - April 30, 2008
MM6--W-Elev. Ground Surface --IF-Elev. Bottom of Casing - Rainfall
35.00
30.00
25.00
20.00
tv
u_
1 M,
5.00
mm
-5.00
r r`
ti r
r
r-
r
r-
r~ ti r
r•
CO
m
ao
00
CO
00
0 0
o a
o
CD
0
0
0 0 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CD
M
M
�
C7
� � to
Cfl
[O
(O
[D
DO
IM
IM
�
N
O
N
r
2
N
N
r
O
N
CD
(—V
4[3 LIO
(0 r—
r--
CO
m
M
O r
N
N
ro
CO
�Y
O O
O O
CD
CD
O
(D
r r e—
c-
O
O
O
O
O
CD
Date
Prepared By Sandra Cleveland
Dale WCV2008
Location Well Data -Year 4 Yfs
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6,00
t
7.00 =
8.00 m
c
9.00
10.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
15.00

w r w � � � � � � � � � m� m m m� m