20001364 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20001024

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
A. Preston Howard, Jr., P.E., Director

NCDENR
January 4, 2001
Orange County
Project # 001364
WAIVER of 401 Water Quality Certification
K.A. Caerel (NC), LLC
C/o Richard Razook
One Southeast third Ave.
Miami, Fl 33131
Dear Mr. Razook:
Your application for a 401 Water Quality Certification was received in the Central Office
on October 24, 2000. According to our rules [ 15A NCAC 2H .0507 (A)], if final action is not
taken within 60 days, the Certification is waived unless DWQ has objected in writing to your
application. Therefore, DWQ has waived the requirement for a 401 Water Quality Certification
for your plains to impact 0.277 acres of wetlands or 2,400 feet of streams for road crossings and a
pond (Caerel development) as described in your application dated October 23, 2000.
However if additional impact occurs or your development plains change, this waiver is no
longer valid and a 401 Water Quality Certification will be required.
Please call me at 919-733-9646 if you have any questions.
U
Cc
Raleigh DWQ Regional Office
Raleigh Field Office Corps of Engineers
Wilmington District Office Corps of Engineers
Central Files
File Copy
Ben Wilson; ECS, Ltd
Wetlands/401 Unit • 1621 Mail Service Center • Raleigh NC 27669-1621
Telephone [phone] • FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer
50% recycled/ 10% post-consumer paper
`e
fry
fp??(!
® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr. Todd Tugwell, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Office
FROM: Danielle R. Pender, Piedmont Region Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: 20 November 2000
SUBJECT: Public Notice for Excavation and Construction activities of Lake Loch Lomond, Wake County,
North Carolina, Action ID No. 200021943
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission have reviewed the subject document.
Our comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (as amended), the Fish
and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d), and North Carolina General Statutes
(G.S. 113-131 et seq.).
The applicant proposes to excavate 7,500 cubic yards of accumulated sediment from approximately 1.5
acres of the upper end of Lake Loch Lomond and discharge the excavated material into approximately 1.5 acres of a
deeper portion (middle) of the lake as part of the Loch Lomond improvement project. This project will impact Long
Branch, a WS-III NSW tributary to Swift Creek, which ultimately drains into the Neuse River.
We have the following comments on this project.
We request that the draining process take place during the cool weather seasons to reduce impacts to
aquatic species.
Sediment will likely become stirred up and suspended during the lake filling process. We request that
discharge from the dam be managed to minimize downstream sedimentation.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this Public Notice. If we can be of further
assistance, please contact our office at [phone].
cc: John Dorney, Wetland Scientist, DWQ
Stephen Hall, Zoologist, Natural Heritage Program
Kathy Matthews, Wetland Section, EPA
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries • 1721 Mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] cm. 281 • Fax: [phone]
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Charles R..Fullwood,Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr. Todd Tugwell, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Office
Ur FROM: Danielle R. Pender, Piedmont Region tnator
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: 21 November 2000

SUBJECT: Public Notice for Fill and Flooding Activities Associated with Construction for
Breckenridge Subdivision, Wake County, North Carolina. Action ID No.
200021794
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission have reviewed the
subject document. Our comments are provided in accordance with provisions of the Clean
Water Act of 1977 (as amended), the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as
amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d), and North Carolina General Statutes (G.S. 113-131 et seq.).
Applicant proposes to impact 0.01 acres wetlands and 1,662 linear feet (if) of streams for
road crossings, sewer line crossings, storm drainage culverts, and residential foundation
construction in a 215-acre residential development, Breckenridge Subdivision. An additional
impact of 1,1001f of an intermittent stream, due to flooding, to construct a storm water
management4)ond/lake is also proposed. The streams that run through the project are tributaries
to Kit Creek. Kit Creek is a major tributary of Northeast Creek, which flows into B. Everett
Jordan Lake. The applicant proposes to provide preservation of 1,7001f of intermittent streams,
establish a naturally vegetated buffer associated with the preserved areas ranging from 30 to
100+ feet wide, preserve a buffer around approximately 40% of the lake, establish a 5-foot wide
vegetative shelf around approximately 50% of the lake, and pay into the North Carolina Wetland
Restoration Program to provide 421 if of stream restoration.
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries • 1721 Mail Service Center • Kalei; h, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] ext. 2S 1 • Fax: [phone]+3
., Page 2
21 November 2000
Breckenridge Subdivision
Corp ID: 200021794
We recommend that the following conditions be incorporated into the permit to reduce
impacts to fish and wildlife resources.
1. In order to minimize stream impacts, while retaining some measure of wildlife habitat,
we recommend a 100-foot undisturbed, native, forested buffer along perennial streams,
and a 50-foot buffer along intermittent streams and wetlands. Maintaining undisturbed,
forested buffers along these areas will minimize impacts to fish and wildlife resources,
water quality, aquatic habitat both within and downstream of the project area, and help
prevent the extirpation of endangered and threatened species. In addition, wide riparian
buffers are helpful in maintaining stability of stream banks and for treatment of pollutants
associated with urban stormwater. Whereas, a grassed buffer, particularly fescue, is a
vegetated buffer but will not provide the necessary and highly valuable functions as
discussed for forested buffers.
2. We request that the littoral shelf be planted in native herbaceous aquatic plants and be
constructed along the entire edge of the pond (excluding the dam) to help mitigate some
of the lost wetland functions and aquatic habitat. In addition, a buffer of native trees and
shrubs should be planted around the pond to provide avian and terrestrial habitat and to
reduce exposure of the water surface to sunlight.
3. Use bridges for all permanent roadway crossings of streams to eliminate the need to fill
and culvert. If culverts must be used, the culvert should be designed to allow for fish
passage. Generally, this means that the culvert or pipe invert is buried at least one foot
below the natural streambed. If multiple cells are required, the second and/or third cells
should be placed so that their bottoms are at stream bankfull stage (similar to Lyonsfield
design). This will allow sufficient water depth in the culvert or pipe during normal flows
to accommodate fish movements. If culverts are long, baffle systems are required to trap
gravel and provide resting areas for fish and other aquatic organisms. If multiple pipes or
cells are used, at least one pipe or box should be designed to remain dry during normal
flows to allow for wildlife passage. In addition, culverts or pipes should be situated so
that no channel realignment or widening is required. Widening of the stream channel at
the inlet or outlet of structures usually causes a decrease in water velocity causing
sediment deposition that will require future maintenance. Finally, riprap should not be
placed on the streambed.
4. Locate sewers and other utilities as far away from creeks as functionally possible and
minimize stream crossings. It is preferable that sewers be located outside the riparian
buffers.
5. The construction of roadways in new neighborhoods can produce short-term direct
impacts as well as long-term cumulative effects. Increased stormwater runoff can
accelerate erosion of stream banks and scouring of the stream channel. Additionally, the
pollutants (e.g., sediment, heavy metals, herbicides, pesticides, and fertilizers) washed
Page 3
21 November 2000
Breckenridge Subdivision
Corp ID: 200021794
from roads and urban landscapes can adversely affect and extirpate species downstream
of developed areas. Grassed swales in place of curb and gutter and on-site stormwater
management (i.e. bioretention areas) can be installed to produce no net change in the
hydrology of the watershed and are recommended. These designs often cost less to
install and significantly reduce environmental impacts from residential development.
Many of these recommendations have been applied in Maryland in efforts to protect the
Chesapeake Bay from water quality degradation.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this Public Notice. If you
require further assistance please contact our office at [phone].
cc: John Dorney, Wetland Scientist, DWQ (DWQ ID: 001218)
Kathy Matthews, Wetland Section, EPA
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney
Non-Discharge Branch
Regional Contact: Matt Flynn
WQ Supervisor: Ken Schuster
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name K. A. Caeral Property County Orange
Project Number 00 1364 County2
Recvd From APP Region Raleigh
Received Date 10/24/00 Recvd By Region
Project Type
Certificates Stream
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
O YO N F-6-24-4-(2) WSll NSW CA 30,604. 0.28 r
O Y O N r I I r I-rI - xI - F_ F_
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet

Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? Q Y O N Did you request more info? Q Y O N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? Q Y O N
Is Mitigation required? p Y O N Recommendation: Q Issue 0 Issue/fond O Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 355849 Longitude (ddmmss) 790948
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Comments:
Issue under the condition that only one road crossing is allowed, and pond has a buffer placed

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
?,. WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
RO. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
IN REPLY REFER TO
Regulatory Branch
Action ID No. 200120110
November 29, 2000
Mr. Richard Razook
K.A. Caeral (NC), LLC
One Southeast Third Avenue, 17?' Floor
Miami, Florida 33131
Dear Mr. Razook:
Please reference your Preconstruction Notification (PCN) for Department of the Army
(DA) nationwide permit authorization to adversely impact approximately 2400 linear feet (0.277
acre) of an unnamed tributary of Water Fork Creek associated with the proposed construction of
a 5 acre pond on your property, located off of SR 1102, near Dodson Crossroads, in Orange
County, North Carolina.
On March 9, 2000, the DA published in the Federal Register the Final Notice of Issuance
and Modification of Nationwide Permits establishing procedures and conditions for Nationwide
permit authorization for impacts to jurisdictional waters and wetlands of the United States.
Nationwide Permit General Condition 19 ("Mitigation") of this Federal Register notice mandates
that projects must be designed and constructed to avoid and minimize adverse effects to waters
of the United States to the maximum extent practicable at the project site (i.e., onsite). It also
states that mitigation will be required when necessary to ensure that the adverse effects to the
aquatic environment are minimal. Nationwide Permit General Condition 13 ("Notification")
requires that all PCNs submitted for the utilization of Nationwide Permit 39 must include a
written statement to the District Engineer explaining how avoidance and minimization of losses
of waters of the United States were achieved, and include a compensatory mitigation proposal
that offsets unavoidable losses of waters of the United States or justification explaining why
compensatory mitigation should not be required. Your PCN, in the absence of a mitigation
proposal and description of avoidance and minimization efforts, is incomplete and can not be
processed.
To complete your application and enable us to process it in full compliance with the
above nationwide permit general conditions, you must provide the following additional
information:

a. It is necessary for you to have taken all appropriate and practical steps to avoid and
minimize impacts to jurisdictional waters. Please indicate all that you have done, especially
regarding development and modification of plans and proposed construction techniques, to avoid
and minimize adverse impacts.
b. Please indicate your plan to mitigate for the projected, unavoidable loss of waters or
provide information as to the why such mitigation should not be required.
This requested information is essential to our processing of your application and should
be forwarded to us by December 15, 2000. We will initiate processing of your permit request
upon receipt of your response. Please note that a copy of your response must be sent to the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality to enable them to adequately evaluate your application for a
Water Quality Certification pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act.
If you have questions, please do not hesitate to contact John Thomas, Raleigh Regulatory
Field Office, Regulatory Branch, telephone [phone].
Sincerely,
'?:I. A?'? " "-C'?tA
S. Kenneth Jolly
Chief, Raleigh Regulatory
Field Office
Copies Furnished:
Mr. Doug Huggett
North Carolina Department of
Environment and
Natural Resources
Post Office Box 27687
Raleigh, North Carolina 27611
Mr. John Dorney
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
Wetland / 401 Unit
Mr. Paul G. Wiesner
Engineering Consulting Services, Ltd.
P.O. Box 12015
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621

y

® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Charles R. Fulhvood, Executive Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr. John Thomas, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
FROM: Danielle R. Pender, Piedmont Region Coordinator
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: 20 November 2000
SUBJECT: Pre-Construction Notification Application for Caeral Creek Subdivision, Orange
County, Action ID: 200120110, DWQ ID No. 001364
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have
reviewed the subject pre-construction notification application. Our comments are provided in
accordance with provisions of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (as amended), the Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d), and North Carolina General
Statutes (G.S. 113-131 et seq.).
The applicant has proposed to impact approximately 2,400 linear feet (If) of stream and
0.277 acres of wetlands for the construction of a 5-acre residential pond. Impacts due to two
stream crossings are also proposed, although it is unclear as to whether the applicant is
requesting a permit for these impacts at this time or whether these additional impacts will be
addressed in a future application. This project will impact Watery Fork, a Class WS-II tributary
to Cane Creek, which ultimately flows into the Cape Fear River. There are records for the
existence of the state threatened squawfoot (Strophitu.s undulatus) and the state significantly rare
notched rainbow (Villosa constricts) and caddisfly (Ceraclea tarsipunctata) in Cane Creek;
therefore, protecting water quality is essential.
We would prefer that the stream and adjacent wetlands remain in their natural state with
100-foot native undisturbed, forested buffers. This scenario would best minimize impacts to fish
and wildlife and additionally provide water quality benefits. If the 401/404 certification is issued
for the proposed project, we request a 4-6-foot wide littoral shelf, planted in native herbaceous
aquatic plants, be constructed along the edge of the pond to help mitigate some of the lost
Mailing Address: Division of Inlaid Fisheries • 1721 mail Service Center • Raleigh, NC 2 7699-1 72 1
Telephone: [phone] ext. 281 • Fax: [phone]
Page 2
20 November 2000
Caeral Creek Subdivision
Action ID: 200120110, DWQ ID 001364
wetland functions and aquatic habitat. In addition, a 50-foot buffer of native trees and shrubs
should be planted around the pond to provide avian and terrestrial habitat and to reduce exposure
of the water surface to sunlight.
In addition to the above recommendations, we request that the following conditions be
incorporated into the permit to reduce impacts to fish and wildlife resources.
Require all remaining wetlands on the site to be protected from additional impacts by
placing them in a permanent conservation easement to prohibit filling, draining, flooding,
and excavation.
2. A minimum 50-foot undisturbed, forested buffer should be maintained along all
intermittent streams and wetland areas, while a minimum 100-foot undisturbed, forested
buffer should be maintained along all perennial streams within the project area.
Maintaining undisturbed, forested buffers along these areas will minimize impacts to fish
and wildlife resources, water quality, aquatic habitat both within and downstream of the
project area, and to help prevent the extirpation of endangered and threatened species. In
addition, wide riparian buffers are helpful in maintaining stability of stream banks and for
treatment of pollutants associated with urban stormwater.
3. Use bridges for all permanent roadway crossings of streams to eliminate the need to fill
and culvert. If culverts must be used, the culvert should be designed to allow for fish
passage. Generally, this means that the culvert or pipe invert is buried at least one foot
below the natural streambed. If multiple cells are required, the second and/or third cells
should be placed so that their bottoms are at stream bankfull stage (similar to Lyonsfield
design). This will allow sufficient water depth in the culvert or pipe during normal flows
to accommodate fish movements. If culverts are long, baffle systems are required to trap
gravel and provide resting areas for fish and other aquatic organisms. If multiple pipes or
cells are used, at least one pipe or box should be designed to remain dry during normal
flows to allow for wildlife passage. In addition, culverts or pipes should be situated so
that no channel realignment or widening is required. Widening of the stream channel at
the inlet or outlet of structures usually causes a decrease in water velocity causing
sediment deposition that will require future maintenance. Finally, riprap should not be
placed on the streambed.
4. Locate sewers and other utilities as far away from creeks as functionally possible and
minimize stream crossings. It is preferable that sewers be located outside the riparian
buffers.
The construction of roadways in new neighborhoods can produce short-term direct
impacts as well as long-term cumulative effects. Increased stormwater runoff can
accelerate erosion of stream banks and scouring of the stream channel. Additionally, the
pollutants (e.g., sediment, heavy metals, herbicides, pesticides, and fertilizers) washed
from roads and urban landscapes can adversely affect and extirpate species downstream
of developed areas. Grassed swales in place of curb and gutter and on-site stormwater
management (i.e. bioretention areas) can be installed to produce no net change in the
hydrology of the watershed and are recommended. These designs often cost less to
install and significantly reduce environmental impacts from residential development.
Page 3
20 November 2000
Caeral Creek Subdivision
Action ID: 200120110, DWQ ID 001364
Many of these recommendations have been applied in Maryland in efforts to protect the
Chesapeake Bay from water quality degradation.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this pre-construction notice. If
we can provide further assistance, please contact our office at [phone].
cc: John Dorney, Wetland Scientist, DWQ
Steve Hall, Zoologist, Natural Heritage Program
#-. -0 -%
ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD.
Ge?ltj tion Materials • Environmental
OCT 2 42000
October 23 2000
PAYMENT
Mr. John Thomas RECEIVED
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
6508 Falls of Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Mr. John Dorney
NCDENR - Division of Water Quality
Wetland/401 Unit
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699 0 0 1 3 6 4
RE: Pre-Construction Notification Application
K.A. Caeral Property
Orange County, Hillsborough, North Carolina
ECS project # 8776
Dear Sirs:
Please find the Pre-Construction Notification Application for the above referenced site. We
estimate that the project will impact approximately 0.277 acres of wetlands.
Based on our calculations, we estimate the total amount of wetlands impacted by this project will
be 0.277 acres. We are requesting a Nationwide Permit 39 and 401 Water Quality certification
for the proposed wetlands impact and stream crossings. Please feel free to contact me at (919)
544-1735 if you have any questions concerning this request or if additional information is
required. Thank you in advance for your timely consideration in this matter,
Sincerely,
Paul G. Wiesner
Staff Scientist
Benjamin J. Wilson, P.E.
Principal Engineer / Vice President
I:\Dept6\Proj ects\8776\letter.doc
P. O. Box 12015, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709 * [phone] • FAX [phone] • 1-800-327-5832 • www.ecslimited.com
Aberdeen, MD * Atlanta, GA Austin, TX Baltimore, MD Chantilly, VA Charlotte, NC Chicago,&U'ING*?BN[ l'INCi JkV?CFSFrLe"ck, MD Fredericksburg, VA
Greensboro, NC - Greenville, SC • Norfolk, VA • Research Triangle Park, NC Richmond, VA - Roanoke, VA illiamsburg, VA • Wilmington, NC Winchester, VA*
*Testing Services Only
w

001364
DMI ID: CG"13 A XOX XD:
IM4TO=DZ PBFJIXT RBQOSSTBD (PROVIDZ NTIOMXDZ PZIi2dIT 0) t_
PRZ-CCNSTRIICTIOH NOMICATION APPLICATION
FOR NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE:
1) NOTIFICATION TO THE CORPS OF SNGINBERS
2) APPLICATION FOR SHCTION 401 CERTIFICATION
3) COORDINATION WITH THE NC DIVISION OF COASTAL, MANAGEMBNr
SEND THE ORIGINAL AND (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED FORK TO THE APPROPRIATE FIELD OFFICE
OF THE CORPS OF MTGINESRS (ME AORNCY A=nSSEB SHE=). SEVEN (7) C0912S SHOULD BE
SENT TO THE N.C. DIVrSrOg OF EUVIRONMBNTAL MANAGEM= (SES AGENCY ADDRBSSES SH8'T).
FY.SAAB hRYb1T .
1. OWNERS NAME : / \ ' / I e t/ y c ?? L Z__
i o
o l( ?ipwl S? n V/a i n J t 1o k 4 11, 1 •
2. MAILING ADDRESS : ?-b X ?
/l
tti Pl, 33131
r, ?+e"S i V P? 1 StisDIVISIIODi NAM& : ?? C c C<PP ??
CITY: STATE.N CZIP CODE :
PROJECT LOCATION DRESS, INCL ING SUDDIVISION NAME (IF DXPFERENT FROM
MAILING ADIMESS ABOVE) : p/? Son rn S s /o t?O r 6,/. 3. TELEPHONE NUM31ER (HOME)- (WORK) : es_ _ Q
4. IF APPLICABLE; AGENT'S NAME OR RBSpONSnLR CORPORATE OPF' CIAL,
ADDRESS, PHONE N VBER-
l
S. LOCATION OF %OAX (PROVIDE A MAP, PREFERABLY .A COPY OF USGS TOPOQRAPHIC MAP OR
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY WITH SCA'LS):
COUNTY: O? NPARRST TOWN OR CITY: rc' r r o l?
SPECIFIC LOCATION (INCLUDE ROAD NDMBMS. LANDMARKS, ETC.)
>? l? "Ad
6. IMPACTED OR NEAREST STREAM/RIVER :
RI'D'ER BASIN: i' a

e
?a. IS PROTECT LOCATED NEAR WATER CLASSIFIED AS TROUT, TIDAL SALTWATER
(SA), HIGH QUALITY WATERS (HQW), OUTSTANDING RBS07JRCS WATERS (ORW), WATSR SUPpLy
(WS-1 OR WS-1I)? YES ( i NO EX1 IF YES, EXPLAIN:
7b. IF THE PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN A NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
ARE OF ENVIRONMMffAL CONCERN (ABC) ? YES I ) NO ?<j
7C. IF THE PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN A COASTAL COUNTY (SBB PAGE 7 FOR LIST OF COASTAL
COUNTIES), WHAT IS T14E LAND USE PLAN (LUV) DESIONATION
$a. 1MVE ANY 92CTIOR 404 PERMITS 1092H PREVIOC7SLY REQUESTED POR LYSE ON THX9 PROPERTY?
YBS f ] No EX) ZV YES. PROVIDE ACTION I.D. SUMIMR. OF IRE" XCUS PERMIT AND ANY
ADDITYOIrAL IN709MATIONY (INCLUDE PHOTOCOPY OF 401 CERTIFICATION) :
9b. ARE ADDITIONAL PERMIT R'6ODESTS EXPECTED FOR THIS PROPERTY IN THE FUTURE?
YES (Yj 90 E I IF YES, DESCRIBE A TICIPAT2D WORK-
`-©"S-f(u(-l")n os I' e s'11P. ?-.rI )\0i., r5 d /o"ll ?//cps
9A. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES IN TRACT OF LAND: ii),P0 C . - F -. ,
98. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS LOCATED ON PROJECT SITE: n[?? ?/ ; ? (?„ ?1ac
10A. NOMSER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECP BY:
FILLING: ? `) 1 EXCAVATION:
FLOODYNYG : OTHEst.
DRAINAGE: TOTAL ACRES TO BE IMPACTED:
? 1 t
r I
f
10B. (1) STREAM CHANNEL TO BE IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT (IF RELOCATED, PROVIDE
DISTANCE BOTH BEFORE AND AMR RELOCATION):
LENGTH BEFORE: /;Yj FT AFTER: 4-0 WIDTH BEFORE (base//d on normal high water contours) a T PT
WIDTH AFTER : 4 . () BT
AVERAGE DEPTH BEFORE : O S AFTER, /? f U( ? 1, '0 FT
(2) 9TREAIK cxtnML IMPACTS WILL R]IgULT FROM: (CHECK ALL THNT APUL )
OPEN C*I11rML RE X=TEON: PLACEM9UT OF PIPS tfT Ct Y,:
CHANNEL RLEVAT101r: CONSTRUCTION OF A DAK1FLc0DYL=: 7_
OTHER:
11. IF CONSTRUCTION OF A POND IS PROPOSED, WHAT IS THE SIZE OF THE WATERSHED DRAINING
TO THE POND? ? ) ?? -. r /rS
WHAT 13 THE EXPECTED POYD SURFACE AREA? : ffzeoY. i c, C / P S
12. DESCRXPTION OF PROPOSED WORK INCLUDING DISCUSSION OF TYPE OF MECHANICAL tSOCIPMENT
TO BE USED (ATTACH PLANS: 8%0 x I10 DRAWINGS ONLY):
7 '/ J
P_. (J?lll I/dlt/PS ?!?/`S"?ii,r•?.n?, n?---+? ;?IrOc,A
?- / / 't f- 1ln P ?I 1 t.,0 /n.. .. , f . r ) . 6,J/'

13. PURPOSE OF PROPOSED WORK: O (7r? ./P c n ?( /?f•rl

r
14. STATE REASONS WHY IT IS BELIEVED THAT THIS ACTIVITY MUST BE CARRIED OUT IN
WETLANDS. (INCLUDE ANY MEASURES TAKEN TO MINIMIZE WETLAND IMPACTS):
('???5?? / mod.=ice ??s. < ???
?r
40 -

15. YOU AR8 REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER (9-HPO) (BSS
AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET} REGARDING TI49 PRESENCE OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES IN THE
PERMIT AREA WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT
DATE C0NTACTBD : L u i \
16. DOES THE PROJECT INVOLVE AN EXPENDIT(ME OF PUBLIC ?UNDO 01 THE USE OF PUBLIC
(STATE) LAND7 YES ( I NO [XI (IF NO, GO TO 18)
a. IF YES, DOTS THE PROJECT REQUIRE PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT
PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT?
YES [ I No [ I
b. IF YES, HAS THE DOCUMENT BEEN REVIEWED THROU= THS NORTE CAROLINA. DEPARTMENT
OP ADMINISTRATION STATE CLEARINGHOUSE? YES [ I NO [ I
IF ANSWER TO 17b IS YES, TOW SUBMIT APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION PROM THE STATB
CLEARII UROUSE TO DIVISION OF LNVTRO1s "VTAL MANAQEMF.b1T REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT.
QUESTIONS REGA"ING THE STATE CLEARINGHOUSE RIZVIR'W PROCESS SHOULD an DIRECT= TO
MS. CHRYS DAGGETT, DIRECTOR STATE CLEARINGHOUSE, NORTH CAROLINA DEPWZM OF
ADMINISTRATION, 1302 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27699-1302,
TELEPHONE [phone].
17. THE FOLLOWXNQ ITEMS SHOULD BE XNCLtMMD WITH THIS APPLICATION IF PR0POS13D ACTIVITY
INVOLVES THE DISCHARGE OF EXCAVATED OR FILL MATERIAL INTO WETLANDS:
a. WETLAND DELINEATION MAP SHOWING ALL WETLANDS, STREAMS, LAKES AND PONDS ON THE
PROPERTY (FOR NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBSRS 14, 18, 21, 26, 24, AND 38). ALL
STREAMS (INTERMITTENT AND PERMANENT) ON T%M PROPERTY MUST BE SHOWN ON THE MAP.
H" SCALES SHOULD BE I INCH EQUALS SO nFT OR 1 INCli EQUALS 100 FEET OR THEIR
FQU IVAI,ENT .
b. IF AVAILABLE, REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPH OF WETLANDS TO BE IMPACTED BY PROJECT.
r?
C. IF DELINEATION WAS PERFORMED BY A CONSULTANT, INCLUDE ALL DATA SHEETS RELEVANT
TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE DELINEATION LINE•
d. ATTACH A COPY OF THO STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN IF R20MRir'D.
i
e. WHAT X3 LAND USE OF Si7l2RO't7 MIND PROPERTY? lie, c ??. ?. / / , , ?' J
f. IF APPLICABLE, WHAT IS PROPOSED NETXOD Off' SBWAGE DISPOSAL?

S. SIGNED A= DATRD BY AGENT AMORIZATIOR' LETTER. IF APPLICABLE.
NOTE t WETLANDS OR WATERS OP TICS U.S. MAY NOT BE IMPACTED PRIOR Tit :
1} ISSUANCE OF A SECTIOM 404 CORPS OF ENGINEERS PERMIT, AND
2) EITHER THE ISSUANCE OR WAIVER OF A 901 DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGZMPXT
(WATER QUALITY) CERTIFICATION.

OWNER' S/AGEMT' S SIGNAT
(AGENT'S SIGNATURE VALID ONLY
IF AUTHORIZATION LETTER FROM
THE OWNER IS PROVrDID (1$0.))
fo/
DATE
dw ,

U.S. F2$H "M MILY)I,IF2! SBRvICB M&TIO1tl, MARINE FIiABRISS 8ZRVICE V.S. PISS AND ¦It.PLYy"RRVICO
RALEICn YIELD OFF=CE 8A8ITAT CONSERVATSON OZVISION A83{MLLLN FIELD OFFICE
P.O. BOY 33725 PIVSRS iSLANO 160 ZILLICOA S22NZT
:Araz*m, NO 17636-3728 BMWFORT, NG Wif AMXN'VILLR. Jxo 28803
TELBPLMNZ [phone] TELSPEi)NE [phone] TMLRPSONE [phone]
ATATS RYSTORYC PRH$=RVATXOK OFF=
IT-0. DIVISION of AXMVNB AND HISTORY
109 EAST JONZS STRZET
2AIESi1ul me 17601
TELSPHONZ 1919) 733-5763
STATR??FB?.ATORS.._AQEI+iCIB@ a
MR. JCM DORNZY
bivisznw Of S61t? RCMM ETAL M&WAXbMNT
NORTZ CAMPINA DRBAA'17am OF
ZXVIRODEfW AND KAITURAL RESOURCES
1621 MARL 9ZRVIC3 CM4TZR
RAX=Qa, RONTR CUMLIMA 37698-1621
TRLVPAKM [phone]
CORPS OF maYNQER3 FTELO OXFTC$s.
RALEIGH RROULATORT FRED OFFICE
us mm CORPS OF 7 crwsL*B9
$599 FALLS OF TSE "USN ROAD, SVITB 120
VAL8t08, me 17615
MEPSOM'A [phone]
NASMjwGTON REGULATORY FISLD OFFICE
ve Am CORPS OF ENGINZERS
mar OFFICE sor laoa
wmm;)Mcni, MC 27889-1000
TYLSPRONS [phone]
MR. STEVE amr ON
DIviBIom OF CQUTAL KLKAOE=ff
MORTM QAl*ts% x DRPA N Or
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL 9ESOURCE8
im xLzL SZAYICE ciwTER
IXLNICM, WCkM CM]tOLTAk 27899-1621
T
CP%WM 1919) 733-2293
VA {919) 733-1495
AMtIEVILLB REGULATORY FIBLD OF"CR
Us ARMY CORPS 08 amzm SSRS
151 PaxTON AVID =, ROOM 143
hsmv%mz, 1R: 28801-6006
TELEPHONE [phone]
WIMMINOTOR RBGOY,ATORY IPXIC= orrxcZ
V3 ARMY CORPS OF BNt3INSERS
PIO07 OIFZCll sox 1840
mXt=wCT0M, WC 28402-1990
TELEPNONE [phone]

COASTAL COUH TIn IN M RTK CAROLIWAt

BEAUFORT BERTIB BRUNSWICK
CEOWAN CRAVEN CMITOcx
88RTFQRD =2 im "NOVRR.
PASOOOT"K PSNDER 11SA001"ANS
1220M . Cot G mss IN NORTH CARO Lm l

ALL88FOlblY ASHB AVERY
BURKE CALDWELL cHrAima
C+RAK" KAYWOOD imNDER90m
MACON MADISON MODOWELL
POLK RUTHRR80RL STOK29
SMA.YN T"NsYAVAlm KATAU+ A WYI.IKES
YAKCEY
CAMM CA[tTxlt*T
DARB GATES
ONSLOW PAMBTCo
TaRBLL WASHINGTON
BUNG MR
CLAY
JACK=
MITCHRLL
St)"Y
Y SY P Y 2 U-5, 4M GQU$ QZ a F D O YC s
RUNS= PAWMATOiIY nzw OFFICE AB=VSLLS Ra00LATCZr FI=LD 4FFICE
ALAHANC4 1488 AXAMmmBR LINCOLN
ALLEGHAMY NAGH AVERY MR CON
A9N8 NORTHAMOTON Bl9NCOMm MADISON
CASWELL ORANGE SURKS MCDOWEGL
CHATHAN PERUGN CABARRUS MammU NBURG
DAVIDSON BANDOLPH CALDWBLL MITCHELL
DAVXB 13OC9CIHGld X CATANBA POLjt
DURNAN STX7W cmROKES ROWAN
mcam ` M7. BURRY CLAY B.UTHERPORD
FRANKLIN VAMCB CLEVELAND STAMSY
FORSYTti WAKE CAS% SWAIm
GRANVILLE WARREN GRAM M TRANSYLVANIA
GUILFORD WILKSS FAYWOOD UNION
HALIFAX WILSON KWORISON UkTikom
JONMTCN YADKIN IRE MLL YANEW
JACKSON
WA8=XGT= Ra3IILATORY FI8LA OFFICE WILxxx*roH RMULATORY rxBLD OFFICE
B$AmjkT PAMLICO ANSON ROBESON
BERTIS PASOUOTANX 8Ld a $UPSON
CAMDEN PHA($1IMAN3 BRUNSWICK SCOTLAND
CARTm=* PYTT CARTSRET
CHOWPX TYARSLL COLUM M
CRAVEN 1WRI GTON CMERLANO
CURRTTOCK WAYNE DUPLIN
DARE KAR=rr
CATER HOKE
0*19 N " (CROATAN MONWOMERY
PERTFORD NATIONAL FOREST )00R$
BYDE ONLY) NEW NANOVER
170"ss ONSLOW
LENOIR PSNDL6t
DWTIN RrCKNOnm

77
\ /!}•r_ I v Yet ?/ ? -t - s ? ?'F .
N ? ! lisp! 1rg s S /,? 4;.: i
y- ,r vJ_ m r ? 1i?
K / i U .Tlo P'= ?1
y
14
_ U .L •. _ •` W9?ifYff ? m` C ?
to CA co
N / rl W `?{ ?` to W jm ?j Ile U
N. U ?? V C9 . , m T f7
rV?7r fD i:.: •V F- m .. a
?, C7 • ?? m W U a
\NV
u ? F I
m S4
?' _ z
w
c 17 .? xL
.

/? J r I Jk i9 \
c J
1 vii
C?
\ 1 /(( ,y J r
y / -
I)

K? Irv c

.?- I ?' rli
58-

.J ,? ?/'??

?\i i ? ,\'I ;-.`•

? 4?' ?

_t 3y \I/-/ ?.-. i'.

t??„', ?(\??, hl' 1'
'

??
.
I'? ? ?? / ? % ? I ^ ? ?(" f 1' ` 1 ? r 'S. /j 6 7rZ Ji?/ .?.."!y??.,. Y /, .. ??\\!!\\----''??-y ?' .? . 1
e,? ???%!;
?-- l f 1 ? .
,
-
S c"? ,'
?
. ? 6 `/
/
?j? y [k,dsone Cr ssroad
• ?// \,1 i,,
'-, - ='t, l) \`J L_v -Er ? - `f" i ? ,?'?(Q f r Q?" ?- t/' -?a11??>,,r?? '' /".r•?s ??_?.?\ \ 45
t
NJ
\ •e / L i F % i _ ?. ?? .-. - 1 j r .,
/"? i i I ..,.

?
• "N?t Vf-., rs" ,\? -Ff11?(..r ?? •`r+
r'
? ?\??
\\, ?- `.?{ t ?
_ /
..` l,,)i} L._! l" ?' ut'. -???`
1
I?1 f Pt
% .' ? ``/? , ,\???
_.l? - ' ? .mil' ?Fra?,...
•/ ?/?( rll????(v ?? ??`? ?
?- ?-f? %?E.Sd
? /?-
r?:
/? • ? !
y
t ` ?.
i/ „?
? 1 /
t
f i I
1 ? J `

l11 11, . , I1,1 I ,1 ? . {IIRI,Ift ?,.tl I `<.nnu Ilclail: 11-I? (hltuln'' N(:?c.t
wk;+e Oros s
74
PT
?J

0
"/ fr
100,

111;,'
OD
Qo
co
V
m
Q W O W
w O W
CL Q LL w w
a O W a
N Q Q
Q Q (n
U ? v C,
fA V J p
a r I j M
a LL
¢ U W
U O W j z o z
0
a
o V Y Q j
W o_
J O
Q Q O ,
z
O
O O
CV ?
A
Q w
O

i
w ?.
i
+i ? Vp
17
Q
°r``
\I
~? 1
e
e
c ?r
t? o
,v
v
i
w

j,.
a
c
ti
v
j
-. r
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WET
LAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Applicant/Owner: ate: /0/19YOO
Project/Site: K. A . _.,-j ?qYesw
Investigator: CC ounty: Ora,,, t
tate: Do Normal Circumstances ea
st on the site?
Is the site significantly disturbed At ommunity ID: Is the area a potential Problemeap?cal Sduatlansect ID:
If needed, a lain on reverse. ot ID:
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum for
3._ t? tltrf ( Dt aJ -C'I"
5.
6.
7.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL. FACW or FAC
rwlRd ,1G- pen ?
Sko'( (n.)
Remarks:
7( J 1'
, % `irJ` • ?.?.on SOS S
S rt? rc.•?
bej.
HYDROLOGY
Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
- Stream. Lake, or ride Gauge
_ Aerial Photographs
_ Other
-- No Recorded Data Available
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water:
Depth to Free Water in Pit
- S Cn.)
Su- b (in.)
Depth to Saturated SoU:
Remarks: 1 n v n < f-? of

B2
Dominant nt a?Q
9. Tatum hdic_ a1_`r
10.
11.
13.
14.
15.
7s
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary indicators:
x Inundated
-? Saturated in Upper 12 inches
Water Marks
Drift Lines
Sediment Deposits
Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary, indicators (2 or more required):
Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches
Water-Stained Leaves
Sol Surrey Data
FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
to If S' I
VIrl f,.r-
Appendlx B Blank and Example Data Forms

"r

VF-
SOILS
Map lkiA Name
(Series and Phase):
Drainage Class:
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type? Yes M
Profile Descriotlom
Depth Matrix Color
(inks) Horizon (Munson Moist)
Mottle Colors Mottle Abundance/ Texture, Concretions,
(Munson Moist) wag Stricture, etc"
1 'f"
1) L A"

Hydric Sol indicators:
_ Histosol _ Concretions
_ Histic Epipedon _ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Sods
-X Sul idic Odor _ Organic Streaking In Sandy Solt
_ Aquic Moisture Regime
Reducing Conditions _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
_ Lbted on National
Sods List
-X Gleyed or Low•Chroma Colors _ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
?I y?, ,? so,?l
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? es No (Circle) (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
eYq? No
Hydric Sols Present? j1q No Is Us Sampling Point Within a Wetland? (9 No
Remarks:
-r4 e- t4 r{e ve f14J
7-k 1 I /
L? / ?G n Y ?/a w1 it J)
.100/11--re 07
www?
Approved by HOUSACE W92
Appendix B Blank and Example Data Fonns
B3

DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Is, l`1 Cwt it / ??opt.
Applicant/Owner:
Investigator: efo e
Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? Yes No
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes No
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Yes No
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
+o S f ,-, 6 ed,
Date: /0/19/60
County:
State:
Community ID:
TransectlD:
Plot ID:
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator
F., c
n
3. ?JI I I S- G/?7P/'_'i?nc Fit Y/
4.1n 1C C b?Q hd? n rt?, MJ w L
5.
6.
7.
8.
Dominant Plant So 1gks Stratum Indicator
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL. FACW or FAC o
excluding FAC-).
Remarks:
?O %
HYDROLOGY
_ Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
_ Stream, Lake, or ride Gauge Primary Indicators:
- Aerial Photographs
A _ Other
No Recorded Data Availabl _ Inundated
_ Saturated in tipper 12 Inches
_
e _ Water Narks
_ Drift Lines

Field Observations: - Sediment Deposits
_ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: N
(in
) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
O
. -
xidized Root Channels In Upper 12 Inches

Depth to Free Water in Pit /p
1A _ Water-Stained Leaves
_ Local Sop Survey Data

Depth to Saturated Sop: ??- - FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: /V D Su r
A? '
?
?/
r
?
r
4-, Nr C ?? f t
in fPPf f, din !
,U
4 ?
?
l? 11 ?1 !1 pn
B2
Appendix 8 Bleak and Example Data Forms
L V

r..
SOILS
Map Link Name
(Series and Phase):
Drainage Claw:
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Depth Matrix Color Motto Colors Motto Abundance/ Texture, Concretions.
(inches) Horizon (Munsef Moffat) (Munsef Moist) Size/contrast
` I Structure_ etc. /
0-10 i / A NO I-10* & A)O- nel y ?o?.ti
Hydric Sol Indicators:
- hfstosol - Concretions
- Histic EpWOn - Hgh Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soft
- SuNklic Odor _ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
- Aquk: Moisture Regime _ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
- Reducing Conditions - Listed on National Hyddc Soft List
- Gleyed or Low-Chroma Coors _ Other (amain in Remarks)
Remarks:
149v 17 se
LJ/o /h o-F 4, s U ?' F ?? a Sv ?? . ?, a -?' ?,?i, cc o?
?dlo r
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophydc Vegetation Present? Q No (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yet
Hydric Solt Present? Yes
Remarks:
N ydf. C so; its
(Ckcle)
Is this Sampling Point Wilhin a Wetland? Yes
o ? G ?y?ra?o g` G (?5?? f
Approved by HOUSACE 3192
Appendix B Blank and Example Data Fortes
B3