20140325 Ver 4_09_PJDRequest_20190924_updated20191212_20200124

Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017
Page 1

This form is intended for use by anyone requesting a jurisdictional determination (JD) from the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District (Corps). Please include all supporting
information, as described within each category, with your request. You may submit your request
via mail, electronic mail, or facsimile. Requests should be sent to the appropriate project
manager of the county in which the property is located. A current list of project managers by
assigned counties can be found on-line at:
http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/RegulatoryPermitProgram/Contact/CountyLocator.aspx,
by calling 910-251-4633, or by contacting any of the field offices listed below. Once your
request is received you will be contacted by a Corps project manager.
ASHEVILLE & CHARLOTTE REGULATORY
FIELDOFFICES
US ArmyCorps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue,Room 208
Asheville, North Carolina28801-5006
GeneralNumber: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
RALEIGHREGULATORYFIELDOFFICE
US ArmyCorps of Engineers
3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105
Wake Forest, North Carolina27587
GeneralNumber: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WASHINGTONREGULATORYFIELDOFFICE
US ArmyCorps of Engineers
2407 West Fifth Street
Washington, North Carolina27889
GeneralNumber: [phone]
Fax Number: [phone]
WILMINGTONREGULATORYFIELDOFFICE
US ArmyCorps of Engineers
69 Darlington Avenue
Wilmington, North Carolina 28403
GeneralNumber:910-251-4633
Fax Number: [phone]
INSTRUCTIONS:
All requestors must complete Parts A, B, C, D, E, F and G.
NOTE TO CONSULTANTS AND AGENCIES: If you are requesting a JD on behalf of a
paying client or your agency, please note the specific submittal requirements in Part H.
NOTE ON PART D – PROPERTY OWNER AUTHORIZATION: Please be aware that
all JD requests must include the current property owner authorization for the Corps to
proceed with the determination, which may include inspection of the property when
necessary. This form must be signed by the current property owner(s) or the owner(s)
authorized agent to be considered a complete request.
NOTE ON PART D - NCDOT REQUESTS: Property owner authorization/notification for
JD requests associated with North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT)
projects will be conducted according to the current NCDOT/USACE protocols.
NOTE TO USDA PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS: A Corps approved or preliminary JD
may not be valid for the wetland conservation provisions of the Food Security Act of
1985. If you or your tenant are USDA Program participants, or anticipate participation in
USDA programs, you should also request a certified wetland determination from the local
office of the Natural Resources Conservation Service, prior to starting work.
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017
Page 2
A. PARCEL INFORMATION
Street Address: _______________________________________________
City, State: _______________________________________________
County:
Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN):
B. REQUESTORINFORMATION
Name:
Mailing Address:
_________________________________________
Telephone Number: _________________________________________
Electronic Mail Address: ________________________________________
Select one:
I am the current property owner.
I am an Authorized Agent or Environmental Consultant
1
Interested Buyer or Under Contract to Purchase
Other, please explain. ________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
C. PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION
2
Name:
Mailing Address:
Telephone Number:
Electronic Mail Address:
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1 Must provide completed Agent Authorization Form/Letter.
2 Documentation of ownership also needs to be provided with request (copy of Deed, County GIS/Parcel/Tax Record).
N/A (Linear Utility Project)
Raleigh, NC
Wake County
See Figure 5
Kimley-Horn; ATTN: Mackenzie Richards
421 Fayetteville St., Suite 600
Raleigh, NC 27601
[phone]
[e-mail]
City of Raleigh - Public Utilities Department; AATN: Ruffin L. Hall, City Manager
222 W. Hargett Street
Raleigh, NC 27601
[phone]
[e-mail]
✔
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017
Page 3
D. PROPERTY ACCESS CERTIFICATION
3,4
By signing below, I authorize representatives of the Wilmington District, U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) to enter upon the property herein described for the purpose of conducting on-
site investigations, if necessary, and issuing a jurisdictional determination pursuant to Section
404 of the Clean Water Act and/or Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899. I, the
undersigned, am either a duly authorized owner of record of the property identified herein, or
acting as the duly authorized agent of the owner of record of the property.
Print Name
Capacity: Owner Authorized Agent5
Date
Signature
E. REASON FOR JD REQUEST:(Check as many as applicable)
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all aquatic resources.
I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be
designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources underCorpsauthority.
I intendto construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcelwhich may
require authorization from the Corps, andthe JDwould beusedto avoid and minimize
impacts tojurisdictional aquatic resources and as aninitialstep in a future permitting
process.
I intendto construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcelwhich may
require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application
and the JD is to be used in the permitting process.
I intendto construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the
U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of
the tide.
A Corps JD is required in order obtain my local/state authorization.
I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps
confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel.
I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land.
Other:___________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
3 For NCDOT requests following the current NCDOT/USACE protocols, skip to Part E.
4 If there are multiple parcels owned by different parties, please provide the following for each additional parcel on a
continuation sheet.
5 Must provide agent authorization form/letter signed by owner(s).
Mackenzie Richards
✔
✔
Mackenzie Richards Date: 2019.09.24 12:01:22 -04'00'
Digitally signed by Mackenzie Richards
9/24/2019
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017
Page 4
F. JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (JD) TYPE (Select One)
I am requesting that the Corps provide a preliminary JD for the property identified herein.
A Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination (PJD) provides an indication that there may
be “waters of the United States” or “navigable waters of the United States”on a property.
PJDs are sufficient as the basis for permit decisions. For the purposes of permitting, all
waters and wetlands on the property will be treated as if they are jurisdictional “waters of
the United States”. PJDs cannot be appealed (33 C.F.R. 331.2); however, a PJD is
“preliminary” in the sense that an approved JD can be requested at any time. PJDs do
not expire.
I am requesting that the Corps provide an approved JD for the property identified herein.
An Approved Jurisdictional Determination (AJD) is a determination that
jurisdictional “waters of the United States” or “navigable waters of the United
States” are either present or absent on a site. An approved JD identifies the limits of
waters on a site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act and/or
Rivers and Harbors Act. Approved JDs are sufficient as the basis for permit
decisions. AJDs are appealable (33 C.F.R. 331.2). The results of the AJD will be
posted on the Corps website. A landowner, permit applicant, or other “affected
party” (33 C.F.R. 331.2) who receives an AJD may rely upon the AJD for five years
(subject to certain limited exceptions explained in Regulatory Guidance Letter 05-
02).
I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information
to inform my decision.
G. ALL REQUESTS
Map of Property or Project Area. This Map must clearly depict the boundaries of the
review area.
Size of Property or Review Area acres.
The property boundary (or review area boundary) is clearly physically marked on the site.
39.4
✔
✔
✔
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017
Page 5
H. REQUESTS FROM CONSULTANTS
Project Coordinates (Decimal Degrees): Latitude: ______________________
Longitude: ______________________
A legible delineation map depicting the aquatic resources and the property/review area.
Delineation maps must be no larger than 11x17 and should contain the following: (Corps
signature of submitted survey plats will occur after the submitted delineation map has been
reviewed and approved).6
ƒNorth Arrow
ƒGraphical Scale
ƒBoundary of Review Area
ƒDate
ƒLocation of data points for each Wetland Determination Data Form or tributary
assessment reach.
For Approved Jurisdictional Determinations:
ƒJurisdictional wetland features should be labeled as Wetland Waters of the US, 404
wetlands, etc. Please include the acreage of these features.
ƒJurisdictional non-wetland features (i.e. tidal/navigable waters, tributaries,
impoundments) should be labeled as Non-Wetland Waters of the US, stream, tributary,
open water, relatively permanent water, pond, etc. Please include the acreage or linear
length of each of these features as appropriate.
ƒIsolated waters, waters that lack a significant nexus to navigable waters, or non-
jurisdictional upland features should be identified as Non-Jurisdictional. Please
include a justification in the label regarding why the feature is non-jurisdictional (i.e.
“Isolated”, “No Significant Nexus”, or “Upland Feature”). Please include the acreage
or linear length of these features as appropriate.
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations:
ƒWetland and non-wetland features should not be identified as Jurisdictional, 404,
Waters of the United States, or anything that implies jurisdiction. These features can be
identified as Potential Waters of the United States, Potential Non-wetland Waters of
the United States, wetland, stream, open water, etc. Please include the acreage and
linear length of these features as appropriate.
Completed Wetland Determination Data Forms for appropriate region
(at least one wetland and one upland form needs to be completed for each wetland type)
____________________________________________________________________________
6 Please refer to the guidance document titled “Survey Standards for Jurisdictional Determinations” to ensure that the
supplied map meets the necessary mapping standards.http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-
Program/Jurisdiction/
35.762075
-78.600975
✔
✔
✔
Jurisdictional Determination Request
Version: May 2017
Page 6
Completed appropriate Jurisdictional Determination form
x PJDs,please complete a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination Form7 and include the
Aquatic Resource Table
x AJDs, please complete an Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form
8
Vicinity Map
Aerial Photograph
USGS Topographic Map
Soil Survey Map
Other Maps, as appropriate (e.g. National Wetland Inventory Map, Proposed Site
Plan, previous delineation maps, LIDAR maps, FEMA floodplain maps)
Landscape Photos (if taken)
NCSAM and/or NCWAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets
NC Division of Water Resources Stream Identification Forms
Other Assessment Forms
_____________________________________________________________________________
7 www.saw.usace.army.mil/Portals/59/docs/regulatory/regdocs/JD/RGL_08-02_App_A_Prelim_JD_Form_fillable.pdf
8 Please see http://www.saw.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory-Permit-Program/Jurisdiction/
Principal Purpose:The information thatyouprovide will beusedinevaluating your requestto determine
whether thereareany aquatic resources within the project areasubjecttofederaljurisdictionunder the regulatory
authorities referencedabove.
RoutineUses:Thisinformation maybeshared with the Departmentof Justice andotherfederal, state,and local
government agencies, and the public,andmaybe made available aspartof a public notice as required byfederal
law. Your nameandproperty location wherefederal jurisdiction is to bedetermined will beincluded in the
approved jurisdictional determination (AJD),which will bemade available tothe public on the District's website
andontheHeadquartersUSAGEwebsite.
Disclosure:Submission ofrequested information is voluntary; however, ifinformation is notprovided, the
requestforanAJD cannot beevaluatednorcananAJD be issued.
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
✔
Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A.REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B.NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD:
C.DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D.PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: County/parish/borough: City:
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.:Long.:
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody:
E.REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH “MAY BE”SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non-wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource “may be”
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
see attached table
Mackenzie Richards, 421 Fayetteville St., Suite 600, Raleigh, NC 27601
NC Wake Raleigh
35.762075 -78.600975
17
Walnut Creek
1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring “pre-
construction notification” (PCN), or requests verification for a non-reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the termsand
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant’s acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit)or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or toprovideanofficial
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there “may be” waters of the U.S. and/or that there “may be”navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:
SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map: ________________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale: _______BBBBBBBBBBBB.
Data sheets prepared by the Corps:________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
Corps navigable waters’ study: ____________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas: ________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
USGS NHD data.
USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name: _________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: __________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name: ________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
State/local wetland inventory map(s): ____________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
FEMA/FIRM maps: ________________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
100-year Floodplain Elevation is: ____BBBBBBBBBBBB.(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
Photographs: Aerial (Name & Date): ______BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
or Other (Name & Date): ______BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:__________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
Other information (please specify): ______________BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB.
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member person requesting PJD
completing PJD (REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)
1
1 Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.
1:24,000/ Raleigh East
Wake County, 1970
NC Statewide Orthoimagery, 2017
Mackenzie Richards Digitally signed by Mackenzie Richards
Date: 2019.09.24 12:01:22 -04'00'
1
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
Type of
aquatic
resource
Geographic authority to
which the aquatic
resource “may be”
subject
W 1 35.760519 -78.590300 0.01 ac. Wetland Section 404
W 2 35.761046 -78.599512 0.08 ac. Wetland Section 404
W 3 35.763836 -78.608787 0.42 ac. Wetland Section 404
W4 35.763415 -78.608453 0.07 ac. Wetland Section 404
W5 35.764183 -78.609316 0.22 ac. Wetland Section 404
W8 35.761554 -78.584580 0.17 ac. Wetland Section 404
W9 35.759569 -78.591873 <0.01 ac. Wetland Section 404
W10 35.763031 -78.604162 0.18 ac. Wetland Section 404
W11 35.764990 -78.609416 <0.01 ac. Wetland Section 404
W12 35.765576 -78.610416 0.69 ac. Wetland Section 404
W13 35.764358 -78.614260 0.20 ac. Wetland Section 404
W14 35.760487 -78.623524 0.35 ac. Wetland Section 404
W16 35.760526 -78.595341 0.21 ac. Wetland Section 404
W17 35.762815 -78.602716 0.06 ac. Wetland Section 404
W18 35.763073 -78.605326 0.02 ac. Wetland Section 404
S1 35.762296 -78.588560 259 LF Non-
Wetland Section 404
S3 35.761956 -78.596985 203 LF Non-
Wetland Section 404
S4 35.761836 -78.596915 26 LF Non-
Wetland Section 404
S5 35.762844 -78.602895 60 LF Non-
Wetland Section 404
S6 35.763600 -78.608806 90 LF Non-
Wetland Section 404
S7 35.763820 -78.608941 113 LF Non-
Wetland Section 404
S8 35.765732 -78.610126 68 LF Non-
Wetland Section 404
S9 35.763732 -78.617714 62 LF Non-
Wetland Section 404
S10 35.765624 -78.610536 218 LF Non-
Wetland Section 404
S11 35.765707 -78.610567 63 LF Non-
Wetland Section 404
S12 35.764376 -78.614228 78 LF Non-
Wetland Section 404
S13 35.762505 -78.588702 33 LF Non-
Wetland Section 404
2
S14 35.762266 -78.587431 62 LF Non-
Wetland Section 404
S17 35.764201 -78.603934 42 LF Non-
Wetland Section 404

GatlingBranchChavisBranch Ca
r
o
l
i
n
a
La
k
e
Longview
Branch
B
r
i
d
g
e
s

C
r
e
e
k
(
B
r
i
d
g
e
s

L
a
k
e
)
Milb
u
r
n
i
e

C
r
e
e
k
(Milb
u
r
n
i
e

L
a
k
e
)Wat
sonBr
anchMahlersCreekWilliam
s
o
n

B
r
a
n
c
h
P e w s
P o n d
B
us
h
y
C
r
e
ekWhite

O
a
k

C
r
e
e
k
(Austi
n

P
o
n
d
)Swift Cree
k
(L a keWh
eeler)BridgesBranchOxfordBranchCemeteryBranchWi
l
dcat
Br
anchBigBranch
BeddingfieldC reekHouseCreekPoplarBranchSoutheastProngBeaverdamCreekReedyBranchMarshCreekWalnut Creek(Lake Raleigh)BuckBranchSouthwestProngBeaverdamCreekRocky
Bra
nc
h Pige o n H o u s e
B ra n c h
U
n
n
a
me
d
Tri
but
ar
yt
oSwiftC
r
e
e
k
(Yat
esMi
l
l
Pond)Mango
Cr
e
e
k
LittleArmBranchW a ln ut Creek
NEUSERI
VERC r a b t r ee
C r e e k
"É54
"É50
£¤1
£¤401
£¤64
£¤70
§¨¦440
§¨¦440 §¨¦540
§¨¦540
§¨¦440
§¨¦440
§¨¦40
§¨¦40
Figure 1: Vicinity Map
Upper Walnut Creek Sanitary Sewer Improvements
Raleigh, Wake County, NC
December 2019
±
Virginia
North Carolina
Georgia
South Carolina
Kentucky
Tennessee
West Virginia
Maryland
WAKE
JOHNSTON
FRANKLIN
DURHAM
HARNETT
CHATHAM NASH
LEE
GRANVILLE
0 1.5 3Miles
Project Location
Wake County
Legend
Raleigh
Wake County
Project Study Area
^_
Atlantic Ocean
±
Legend
Project Study Area
Figure 2: USGS Topographic MapUpper Walnut Creek Sanitary Sewer ImprovementsRaleigh, Wake County, NC
December 2019
0 900 1,800Feet
S6
W14
S17
Figure 3.4
Figure 3.3
Figure 3.2
Figure 3.1
S4
S13
S5 S14
S9
S11 S8
S12
S7
S3 S1
S10
W4
W3
W1
W5W13
W11
W12
W8
W9
W16
W17
W10W18
W2 Hocutts LnSRaleighBlvdM art i n Lut herKingJrBlvd
Rock Quar
r
y RdSunnybrookRdKingstreeCt
SweetgumCir
HarmonyCt
CinnamonCir
Tw i n b ro o kCt
C y n t h i aCt
Blandwood
Ct
Baton Rd
Curthay CtDavyLnBristol Pl
Fulton Ct
B ath C irBradford Pl
H o p eDiam o n d C tPineIvy LnJu
n
o
Ct
Alabaster Ct
Alto
n Pl
Tham
es Ct
Sundial Pl
CandyflowerPlEn
g
l
e
s
i
d
eCt
Bolton Pl
BlueRibbon LnBartStC a b o c h o nDiamond C t
G o l d e nAmber C tSherrybrookDr
Liberty PlThelonious DrFreeman StBrightcreekWayElmhurst CirSunview StFernbrook Rd
Calloway Dr Merrywood DrCartierRuby LnTeeDee St Keenwood Ct
E a t m o nMill C t
PageSt HabitatCtRoyal Pines Dr
MerrickStMaltaAve
OwensLnTiptonSt
Spaulding StBromleySt
ThoroughbredLnBeautyAve P r o v i d e n c eRd
LouiseSt
BowmanLnPlatinumAve
Ma p le wo o dLn
B ri dgevilleRd
Hightower St
MalonePlStoneySpring DrB la z in g
S t a r L n
Ji m m yCarter Wa y Forestford CtUpchurchSt
ProctorRd Ral
phDrCommunity Dr RaleighClub DrRushingCreek PkwyGoldenIvyLn
Londonderry Cir
B
l
a
r
n
e
y
C
t
C o t t o nGrove R u n
SmokyTopazLn
SanderfordRdWoodmeadowPkwy
BlueCoral DrTroutLilly PlBri
armontCtS
h
e
r
woodA
v
eNobleCreekLnAshfordStJoe LouisAve
RobinsonAve
Ki
ngArt
hur RdNi
ght
shadeWayHewberryLn
Glasgow S tLa
montStELenoir St
WinstonDiamond CtKitt Pl Parnell DrBragg St RawlsDrEllerbe Ln
EdisonRdBelafonteDr
GreysonSt B
ell D
r
SunnyCoveDrW atersDrS
h
an
non St
Dandridge DrHaywood StGilliamLn
Postell St
Curtis Dr
Bates StP
eyto
n
St Belmont DrBe
n
tl
e
y

L
n
L i t t l e J o h n R dSP eartreeLnAberdeenDrG la d s to n e D rGreenwichStLansing StColeman StBoaz RdGregg StBri
gham RdKing Richard RdC ro y do n S t
Briar
cliffRdChurch StFountainDrSouthgateDrQuarry StMelvidCt
Grantl
andDrP e t e r s o n S t
Darby StS unbrightLnEdwinDrFriarTuckRdEasternBranchRd
Fitzgerald Dr Williams RdGlenbrookDrBeverly
Dr
Red Quartz DrPl
easantGarden LnPoole Rd
Weston StB u nc h e D r Cumberland StCarl
i
sl
e StHadley Rd CrawfordRdM i d d l e B r a n c h R dLunarDrCooper RdSolar Dr Dacian Rd SamuelStLyndhurst DrCross Link RdS State StAtkins DrVardaman StSt George RdRoseLn±
Legend
Streams
Wetlands
Project Study Area
Figure 3: J urisdictional Features MapUpper Walnu t Creek Sanitary Sewer ImprovementsRaleigh, Wake County, NCDecember 2019
0 900 1,8 00Feet
S9
S12
W14
W13 Ni
ght
shadeWa
y
P e t e r s o n S tVardaman StS State StRock Quar
r
y Rd±
Legend
Streams
Wetlands
Project Study Area
Figure 3.1 : Jurisdictional Features MapUpper Walnu t Creek Sanitary Sewer ImprovementsRaleigh, Wake County, NCDecember 2019
0 250 500Feet
S17
S5
S11 S8
S12
S6
S7
S10
W4
W3
W5
W13
W11
W12
W17
W10
W18WildMint CtC y n t h i aCt
Carmen CtRoyal Pines Dr
Glenbrook DrG r e y s o n S t
Bl
azi
ngSt
ar
LnTroutLillyPlNi
ght
shade WayGrantland DrPeyto
n
St Belmont DrBri
gham RdL
u
n
a
r Dr
Dacian RdRock Quar
r
y Rd±
Legend
Streams
Wetlands
Project Study Area
Figure 3.2 : Jurisdictional Features MapUpper Walnu t Creek Sanitary Sewer ImprovementsRaleigh, Wake County, NCDecember 2019
0 250 500Feet
S4
S5
S3
W1
W9
W16
W17
W2
L o n d onderryCir
Thames Ct
CarlisleSt
B
la
r
n
e
y

C
tSherwood Av
eGlasgow St
WestonStFriar Tuck RdB
e
n
tl
e
y

L
n
L i t t l e J o h n R d
G la d s to n e D rGreenwichStDacianRd
Beverly DrRose Ln±
Legend
Streams
Wetlands
Project Study Area
Figure 3.3 : Jurisdictional Features MapUpper Walnu t Creek Sanitary Sewer ImprovementsRaleigh, Wake County, NCDecember 2019
0 250 500Feet
S1 W8
W8
S13
S14
S1
W1
W8
W9
Blandwood Ct
Thames Ct
Springshire CtEngl
esi
deCtCooper RdWeston StWindycr
est
CtKeenwood Ct
CarlisleSt
Beverly DrNobl
e Creek LnForestford CtRushi
ng Creek PkwyLondonderryCir
B
l
a
r
n
e
y

C
t
Bri
armont CtWoodmeadow PkwyPl
easant Garden LnG la d s t o n e D r
B
e
n
tl
e
y

L
n
L i t t l e J o h n R d
SunnybrookRd±
Legend
Streams
Wetlands
Project Study Area
Figure 3.4 : Jurisdictional Features MapUpper Walnu t Creek Sanitary Sewer ImprovementsRaleigh, Wake County, NCDecember 2019
0 250 500Feet
±
Legend
Project Study Area
Figure 4: NRCS Soils Survey
Upper Walnut Creek Sanitary Sewer Improvements
Raleigh, Wake County, NC
December 2019
0 900 1,800
Feet
KingstreeCt
SweetgumCir
HarmonyCt
CinnamonCir
DowlingRdWildMint CtNomarRdBaton Rd
Sosa Rd
Curthay CtDavyLnBristol Pl
Moton Pl
Fulto
n

C
t
Bath Cir
Bradford Pl
HopeDiamond CtPineIvy LnJu
n
o

C
t
Pettis Pl
Alabaster Ct
Al
t
o
n

P
l
Sun
d
i
a
l
Pl
Walser Pl
CandyflowerPlPoitierPlLeadCrystal Ct En
g
l
e
s
i
d
e
C
t
Bolton

P
l
BlueRibbon LnBr
ia
rmon
t
C
t
BaileyDr
CabochonDiamond CtSherrybrookDrLibertyPlThelonious DrFreeman StElmh
u
r
s
t

C
i
rSunviewStFernbr
o
o
k

R
dMerrywood DrCartierRuby LnWarren Ave
Keenwood C
t
EatmonMill Ct
PageSt HabitatCtRoyal Pines Dr
Nelson
St
MerrickStMaltaAve
TiptonSt
Spaulding StBromley St
Ramseu
r

S
t
ThoroughbredLnBeautyAve ProvidenceRd
LouiseSt
Bowman LnPlatinum Ave
MaplewoodLn
B ri dgevilleRd
Hightower St
MalonePlRockbridge RdTeeDee

S
t Stoney Spring DrB la z in g
S ta rL n
JimmyCarter Way Forestford CtUpchurchSt
Pro
c
t
o
r
Rd
Community

D
r
RushingCreek PkwyGoldenIvyLn
B
l
a
r
neyCt
Cotton Grove Run
Woodmea
d
o
wPkwy
BlueCoralDrTroutLilly PlBartStRaleighClub DrHaywoodStNobleCreekLnAshfordStJoe LouisAve
KingArthur
Rd
HewberryLn
L
a
montStGlasg o wSt
E Lenoir
St
WinstonDiamond CtBates StKitt Pl
Bragg St WaltonStEllerbe LnAngier AveSanderfordRdEdisonRdW ood p e c k e rC tBel
a
f
o
n
t
e

D
r
GreysonSt B
e
l
l

D
rRawls DrWinslowRidgeDr
W a tersDrMontagueLnMark Massengill DrSunnyCoveDrS
h
a
n
n
o
n

S
t
Dandridge DrRalph DrS
K
i
n
gCharle
s
RdGilliamLn
Postell St
Curtis Dr BelmontDrBent
l
ey
L
n Birch Ridge DrTomGipson DrPeytonStE Davie St
Little John RdAberdeenDr
Peterson St
G la d s to n e D rGreenwichStLansing StColeman StBoaz RdBrighamRdKing Richard RdCroydon St
Briar
cliffRdChurch StFountainDrMelvid Ct
SouthgateDrQuarry StGrantl
andDrDarby StSunbrightLn
Edwin DrBeverly DrE asternBranchRdFriarTuckRdParnell DrNewcombe Rd S Peartree LnFitzgerald Dr Williams RdGlenbrookDrBunche Dr RedQuartz DrPleasant Garden Ln
Poole R
d
Weston StCumberlandStCarl
is
le St
Hadley Rd CrawfordRdLunar
Dr Cooper RdSolarDrDa
c
i
a
n

R
d
Middle Branch RdSamuelSt
Lyndhurst DrCross Link RdS State StAtkins DrVardaman StSt George RdRose LnHocutts LnS Raleigh BlvdM art i n Lut he rK i ng Jr B l vd
Rock Qua
r
ry
RdSunnybrookRd§¨¦40
§¨¦440
0
2
35
7
9
13
14
16
23
25
27
33
34
36
38
41
42
43 46
51 53
55 56
57
58
61
67
69
70 71
72
74
75
76
77
78
79
84
85
87
88
91 92
94
95
97 97
98
99
100
101
102
105
106
110 116
117
118
119
121
122 123
124
125
127
128129
131
132
132135136
137
139
141 145
148 149
151
152
154
157
159
161
164
166
167
168
±
Legend
Adjacent Properties
Project Study Area
Figure 5: Adjacent Property Owners Map Upper Walnut Creek Sanitary Sewer ImprovementsRaleigh, Wake County, NC
December 2019
0 900 1,800Feet
Map ID PIN Property Owner Address 1 Address 2 Address 3
0 1713929122 BEVERLY 1208 LLC 410 BYRAMS FORD DR CARY NC 27513-4295
1 1723122036 VERKERK, CORNELIS FORD 1229 BENTLEY LN RALEIGH NC 27610-4201
2 1713530538 THOMAS, TRACEY 813 WILD MINT CT RALEIGH NC 27610-4957
3 1723220475 VOGLER ENTERPRISES LLC 308 BUNCOMBE ST RALEIGH NC 27609-6312
4 1723019771 WILSON, RENEE A 1320 BEVERLY DR RALEIGH NC 27610-4208
5 1713927324 LAWRENCE, MICHAEL L LAWRENCE, FRANCES H 8311 BRIER CREEK PKWY STE 105-363 RALEIGH NC 27617-7328
6 1713822839 BATRES, FLOR YAZIRA 559 DACIAN RD RALEIGH NC 27610-3539
7 1723110997 SCOTT, DONALD L SCOTT, NANCY E 1323 BEVERLY DR RALEIGH NC 27610-4241
8 1723020123 BEVERLY 1212 LLC 410 BYRAMS FORD DR CARY NC 27513-4295
9 1713729821 DACIAN ROAD LLC 5509B W FRIENDLY AVE STE 201 GREENSBORO NC 27410-4279
10 1723129601 SORLANO, PORFIRIO GUITIERREZ, EVA 1305 LONDONDERRY CIR RALEIGH NC 27610-4235
11 1713632491 ALEXANDER, ANNIE P 1801 CYNTHIA PL RALEIGH NC 27610-3533
12 1713730131 JAG PROPERTIES LLC 116 COVINGTON SQUARE DR CARY NC 27513-4782
13 1713927512 BAKER, SONIA 1108 BEVERLY DR RALEIGH NC 27610-4204
14 1713824443 RALEIGH CITY OF PO BOX 590 RALEIGH NC 27602-0590
15 1713827340 RASAKULASURIAR, ROHINI 1927 MOSTYN LN APEX NC 27502-6509
16 1713436076 TRIANGLE GREENWAYS COUNCIL 520 POLK ST RALEIGH NC 27604-1960
17 1713921474 WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY FSB TRUSTEE THE RESIDENTIAL CREDIT OPPORTUNITIES TRUST V-CC/O AMERICAN MORTGAGE INVESTMENT3020 OLD RANCH PKWY STE 180 SEAL BEACH CA 90740-2799
18 1713928157 JACKSON, LASHANNA 1204 BEVERLY DR RALEIGH NC 27610-4206
19 1713735431 LEA, CHRISTOPHER 841 BELMONT DR RALEIGH NC 27610-3521
20 1713729930 HOLT, JORDAN DENYSE 823 COTTON PL RALEIGH NC 27601-1617
21 1713437294 SETTLES, LAWANDA 840 NIGHTSHADE WAY RALEIGH NC 27610-4980
22 1723111766 HUNTER, ROBERT LEE HUNTER, LUCILLE G 1328 BEVERLY DR RALEIGH NC 27610-4208
23 1713739156 PETTIFORD, BOBBY L PETTIFORD, SHIRLEY W 1019 ANDERSON ST DURHAM NC 27705-5803
24 1713929436 SEWELL, LOUISE L SEWELL-FISHER, SHIRLA PO BOX 14492 RALEIGH NC 27620-4492
25 1723014687 PEEBLES, ERVIN PEEBLES, LAKISHA 1300 BEVERLY DR RALEIGH NC 27610-4208
26 1713920215 HUFF, SUSAN 2420 LITTLE JOHN RD RALEIGH NC 27610-4222
27 1713832416 SANDERS, JEREMY BAITY, JUDITH 523 DACIAN RD RALEIGH NC 27610-3539
28 1713926578 PICKETT, DWIGHT D 1104 BEVERLY DR RALEIGH NC 27610-4204
29 1713927413 WHITAKER, JERRY CORNELL 1112 BEVERLY DR RALEIGH NC 27610-4204
30 1723021227 LANE FAMILY LLC 130 FOREST RD RALEIGH NC 27605-1756
31 1723221431 HODGE, DONALD M HODGE, MARY W 1329 UJAMAA DR RALEIGH NC 27610-5773
32 1723023157 COSMIC HOLDINGS LLC 613 POLK ST RALEIGH NC 27604-1961
33 1723127143 BOONE, RYAN BOONE, TAYLOR 104 WINDEL DR RALEIGH NC 27609-4440
34 1723017628 WALKER, JERRY LEE DAVIS-WALKER, SARAH M 1308 BEVERLY DR RALEIGH NC 27610-4208
35 1713832037 JP REAL ESTATE LLC PO BOX 1697 RALEIGH NC 27602-1697
36 1723128200 BRILLIANT, JONATHAN DAVID BRILLIANT, MARTHA BROOKE 1432 BEVERLY DR RALEIGH NC 27610-4210
37 1723024054 JONES, SHEILAH R 1225 BEVERLY DR RALEIGH NC 27610-4205
38 1713634163 PIERCE, BENJAMIN 800 CARMEN CT RALEIGH NC 27610-3532
39 1713920657 GOODINGS LLC 518 SE MAYNARD RD CARY NC 27511-5716
40 1713436346 MAYZES, CHARLES 828 NIGHTSHADE WAY RALEIGH NC 27610-4980
41 1713734313 HILL, NAOMI L 900 PEYTON ST RALEIGH NC 27610-3545
42 1713827114 RALEIGH CITY OF PO BOX 590 RALEIGH NC 27602-0590
43 1713624159 WAKE CNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION RE SERVICES DIRECTOR 1551 ROCK QUARRY RD RALEIGH NC 27610-4145
44 1713625924 BORN, JAMES JOSEPH 425 AMELIA AVE RALEIGH NC 27615-1502
45 1713921346 HOLLOWAY, DELORES M 2500 LITTLE JOHN RD RALEIGH NC 27610-4224
46 1723012877 SLIPSTREAM RTP REAL ESTATE 1 LLC 1105 TRANSPORT DR RALEIGH NC 27603-4146
47 1723126043 COFIELD, ISHMEL GREGORY COFIELD, TIMOTHY 1420 BEVERLY DR RALEIGH NC 27610-4210
48 1713922585 WIGGINS, CHARLIE JR WIGGINS, NEATRICE L 2512 LITTLE JOHN RD RALEIGH NC 27610-4224
49 1723018790 SCALES, DERRICK L SCALES, HEATHER Z PO BOX 21521 WINSTON SALEM NC 27120-1521
50 1713822841 GUPTA, ANGELA K 3316 BOULDER CT RALEIGH NC 27607-3111
51 1713924861 LYNN, WILLIAM 2605 LITTLE JOHN RD RALEIGH NC 27610-4225
52 1713634244 MCFARLAND, DOUGLAS W MCFARLAND, ANNIE L 1808 CYNTHIA PL RALEIGH NC 27610-3534
53 1723128611 JAMERSON, JERRY A JAMERSON, NANNIE B 1301 LONDONDERRY CIR RALEIGH NC 27610-4235
54 1713832333 JONES, JERALD E 531 DACIAN RD RALEIGH NC 27610-3539
55 1723113867 PRIDE INVESTMENTS LLC 11032 BRASS KETTLE RD RALEIGH NC 27614-8442
56 1723114941 VIERA, SHAKIMA L CARTER, ELIZABETH J 1408 BEVERLY DR RALEIGH NC 27610-4210
57 1713829422 MERRITT, ALONZO S JR MERRITT, GLORIA 2421 LITTLE JOHN RD RALEIGH NC 27610-4221
58 1723020066 PRIDGEON, CHAUNCEY F PRIDGEON, RENWICK D 1013 DELTA RIVER WAY KNIGHTDALE NC 27545-7326
59 1713732084 JOHNSON, RICHARD L OLDS, CARLA J 1005 BELMONT DR RALEIGH NC 27610-3525
60 1723011988 TAYLOR, BARRINGTON TAYLOR, DALE 3125 GOLDEN NUGGET DR CLAYTON NC 27520-8052
61 1713739540 GRAHAM, MAURICE W GRAHAM, ETRICE J 2220 KEITH DR RALEIGH NC 27610-4942
62 1713832230 RODRIGUEZ, LUCILA U GARCIA, ADOLFO 539 DACIAN RD RALEIGH NC 27610-3539
63 1713539712 MIAL, TONY MIAL, MAURICE L 748 LUNAR DR RALEIGH NC 27610-3429
64 1723115906 DUNSTON, MARY L DUNSTON, GEORGETTE DUNSTON PO BOX 15454 KANSAS CITY MO 64106-0454
65 1713739043 AB ELLIOTT LLC BRANDON B ELLIOTT 737 ANCIENT OAKS DR HOLLY SPRINGS NC 27540-8350
66 1713638028 HAYNES, LILLIE MARIE 2220 GRANTLAND DR RALEIGH NC 27610-3550
67 1713924622 KING, FLORA HEIRS ADMIN ANTONIO V KING 4301 THISTLEHILL CT RALEIGH NC 27616-6254
68 1713538931 NEWTON, MARY M 736 LUNAR DR RALEIGH NC 27610-3429
69 1723114635 RALEIGH CITY OF PO BOX 590 RALEIGH NC 27602-0590
70 1713822319 RALEIGH CITY OF PO BOX 590 RALEIGH NC 27602-0590
71 1713827414 GUZMAN, MARIO RENE ROMERO 571 ROSE LN RALEIGH NC 27610-3646
72 1713824628 ROSE BURNTWOOD LLC 11959 AUTUMNWOOD LN FT WASHINGTON MD 20744-6060
73 1713739239 SMITH, JAMES J DAVIS, MARY S PO BOX 28361 RALEIGH NC 27611-8361
74 1713739442 LIM, PHOOL KEE 5716 CRUTCHFIELD RD RALEIGH NC 27606-9700
75 1713925869 LYNN, WILLIAM M LYNN, PATRICIA A 2605 LITTLE JOHN RD RALEIGH NC 27610-4225
76 1723115979 PARTIN, STANLEY PARTIN, GWEN 1416 BEVERLY DR RALEIGH NC 27610-4210
77 1723222304 NATION, ROBERT HAMILTON 1319 CURFMAN ST RALEIGH NC 27603-2207
78 1723112882 STEVENS, QUEEN MARIE LOTSON 1400 BEVERLY DR RALEIGH NC 27610-4210
79 1713436360 SCHOOLER, PAMELA L SCHOOLER, REUBEN G 832 NIGHTSHADE WAY RALEIGH NC 27610-4980
80 1713929612 RAMNARINE, IMRAN RAMNARINE, JUANITA A 1401 TIMBER DR GARNER NC 27529-4746
81 1723021023 KING, ALLEN L KING, EMMA M 1220 BEVERLY DR RALEIGH NC 27610-4206
82 1713631512 HOOKS, ROBERT JEREMY HOOKS, PAMELA J 415 NEW BERN AVE RALEIGH NC 27601-1509
83 1713739140 MIAL, HENRY MIAL, PINESE W 546 DACIAN RD RALEIGH NC 27610-3540
84 1723014998 DANIELS, DIANNE 1229 BEVERLY DR RALEIGH NC 27610-4205
85 1713922448 PRESTIGE HOME SOLUTIONS LLC 400 CARDINAL DR RALEIGH NC 27604
86 1723220543 TOMLISON, OLA MAE 1313 LONDONDERRY CIR RALEIGH NC 27610-4235
87 1713623987 HAYNES, RONALD 804 CARMEN CT RALEIGH NC 27610-3532
88 1713632370 EVANS INVESTMENT GROUP, LLC 206 JEWEL HAVEN WAY KNIGHTDALE NC 27545-7212
89 1723013830 SANDERS, BRENDA H 731 NIGHTSHADE WAY RALEIGH NC 27610-4956
90 1713437224 BROWN, OLIVER W BROWN, SANDRIA J 836 NIGHTSHADE WAY RALEIGH NC 27610-4980
91 1713828242 MACKEY, MARVIN MACKEY, KERRIE 2412 LITTLE JOHN RD RALEIGH NC 27610-4222
92 1723020322 HOME REACH II LLC CRAWFORD CRENSHAW 1312 LUTZ AVE RALEIGH NC 27607-6847
93 1713637058 GUPTA, ANGELA K 3316 BOULDER CT RALEIGH NC 27607-3111
94 1713638190 WHITAKER, JEAN 2224 GRANTLAND DR RALEIGH NC 27610-3550
95 1723013782 SCARBORO, LESTER SCARBORO, ADDIE B 1240 BEVERLY DR RALEIGH NC 27610-4206
96 1723126413 MURRAY, LAWRENCE A 1431 BEVERLY DR RALEIGH NC 27610-4209
97 1723414973 RALEIGH CITY OF PO BOX 590 RALEIGH NC 27602-0590
98 1713722977 WILSON, EDNA M 1009 BELMONT DR RALEIGH NC 27610-3525
99 1723022217 HARGROVE, BETTYE JEAN HEIRS FANNIE HARGROVE 619 ASHFORD ST RALEIGH NC 27610-3720
100 1723016808 RICHARDSON, KERMIT L RICHARDSON, LIZZIE H 1301 BEVERLY DR RALEIGH NC 27610-4207
101 1713639170 LANGLEY, ALICE P 112 LORD BERKLEY RD RALEIGH NC 27610-2418
102 1713920299 JONES, WILLIAM H JONES, FELICIA N 2424 LITTLE JOHN RD RALEIGH NC 27610-4222
103 1713732191 DRUMMOND, JAMES E DRUMMOND, HESTER V 1001 BELMONT DR RALEIGH NC 27610-3525
104 1713827348 CLARK, ANDREW J KLEINSTREUER, NICOLE C 1904 EVERGREEN AVE RALEIGH NC 27603-3010
105 1713719857 RALEIGH CITY OF PO BOX 590 RALEIGH NC 27602-0590
106 1723124201 JONES, BOBBY VINSON JONES, BETTY B 1212 THAMES CT RALEIGH NC 27610-4238
107 1713923558 MBONU, HENRY PO BOX 26953 RALEIGH NC 27611-6953
108 1723123104 HOWARD, JACQUELINE T 1405 BEVERLY DR RALEIGH NC 27610-4242
109 1723129576 RIGGS, WILBUR 1309 LONDONDERRY CIR RALEIGH NC 27610-4235
110 1713626936 BARNER, JEANETTE DENISE 805 CARMEN CT RALEIGH NC 27610-3531
111 1713733204 FLOYD, BARBARA M 911 BELMONT DR RALEIGH NC 27610-3523
112 1723024100 EVANS, CAROLYN H 1221 BEVERLY DR RALEIGH NC 27610-4205
113 1713832040 CAROWAY, JUANITA 551 DACIAN RD RALEIGH NC 27610-3539
114 1713928782 HORNE, WESLEY F HORNE, HELEN S 2700 LITTLE JOHN RD RALEIGH NC 27610-4228
115 1713538864 BURCHETTE, STEVEN 740 LUNAR DR RALEIGH NC 27610-3429
116 1713822944 SIMMONS, DAVID C 555 DACIAN RD RALEIGH NC 27610-3539
117 1713832124 ROBERSON, CHARLIE MAY JR 543 DACIAN RD RALEIGH NC 27610-3539
118 1723126098 LAKWUWA, FASTMAN 1424 BEVERLY DR RALEIGH NC 27610-4210
119 1723022293 BROWN, GWENDOLYN ROSE PRIDGEON, DEBORAH ELAINE 1240 SOMERSET RD RALEIGH NC 27610-1137
120 1713920519 ELLIS, CHRISTOPHER JASON 2505 LITTLE JOHN RD RALEIGH NC 27610-4223
121 1723126512 JONES, EDWARD LEE JONES, CARLENE T 1120 CARLISLE ST RALEIGH NC 27610-4214
122 1713625844 RALEIGH CITY OF PO BOX 590 RALEIGH NC 27602-0590
123 1713822740 DACIAN ROAD LLC 5509B W FRIENDLY AVE STE 201 GREENSBORO NC 27410-4279
124 1713923494 RALEIGH CITY OF PO BOX 590 RALEIGH NC 27602-0590
125 1713539636 LOCH INVESTMENTS, LLC 155 AVENUE JEAN JAURES 92140 CLAMART FRANCE
126 1723129330 ANTHONY, ARTHUR G ANTHONY, ARNITA G 1316 LONDONDERRY CIR RALEIGH NC 27610-4236
127 1723325850 RALEIGH CITY OF PO BOX 590 RALEIGH NC 27602-0590
128 1713832227 ANDERSON, JUANITA GRAY 535 DACIAN RD RALEIGH NC 27610-3539
129 1713739242 ONNIPAUPER LLC 7424 CHAPEL HILL RD STE 204 RALEIGH NC 27607-5041
130 1723128423 MILLER, LILLIAN 1300 LONDONDERRY CIR RALEIGH NC 27610-4236
131 1723222282 JONES, SOPHIA BEVERLY 1329 LONDONDERRY CIR RALEIGH NC 27610-4235
132 1723320892 RALEIGH CITY OF PO BOX 590 RALEIGH NC 27602-0590
133 1713739345 GUPTA, ANGELA K 3316 BOULDER CT RALEIGH NC 27607-3111
134 1713926608 PRIDE INVESTMENTS LLC 11032 BRASS KETTLE RD RALEIGH NC 27614-8442
135 1713921724 LEONARD, RICHARD MARVIN LEONARD, MARY B 2513 LITTLE JOHN RD RALEIGH NC 27610-4223
136 1713927700 THOMPSON, DARLENE 1100 BEVERLY DR RALEIGH NC 27610-4204
137 1713633147 HODGE, MARCELLIN D HODGE, LISA K 1804 CYNTHIA PL RALEIGH NC 27610-3534
138 1723127383 CARR, VALERIE OLIVIA 1436 BEVERLY DR RALEIGH NC 27610-4210
139 1723220009 SMITH, JOHNNIE L JR SMITH, IRIS C 1324 LONDONDERRY CIR RALEIGH NC 27610-4236
140 1723015932 DAVIS, PATRICIA A 1233 BEVERLY DR RALEIGH NC 27610-4205
141 1713735056 RALEIGH CITY OF PO BOX 590 RALEIGH NC 27602-0590
142 1723018619 BURNO, TAWANDA M 1312 BEVERLY DR RALEIGH NC 27610-4208
143 1713832420 GUPTA, ANGELA K 3316 BOULDER CT RALEIGH NC 27607-3111
144 1713824527 ROSE BURNTWOOD LLC 11959 AUTUMNWOOD LN FT WASHINGTON MD 20744-6060
145 1713729947 SMITH, THOMAS C SMITH, DENISE M 4078 TRISHA TRL MIDLOTHIAN VA 23112-3460
146 1713924695 HINTON, SHERRON D 2600 LITTLE JOHN RD RALEIGH NC 27610-4226
147 1723012923 ORCHID HOMES LLC PO BOX 23 MORRISVILLE NC 27560-0023
148 1713539467 RALEIGH CITY OF PO BOX 590 RALEIGH NC 27602-0590
149 1713631573 COSMIC HOLDINGS LLC 613 POLK ST RALEIGH NC 27604-1961
150 1723125333 HINTON, ALMA S CLAUDE TROTTER PO BOX 14241 RALEIGH NC 27620-4241
151 1713733108 FLOYD, WILLARD JR MAJETTE, WILLIE MAE 9613 EDEN TRL FUQUAY VARINA NC 27526-9242
152 1713928943 SANSOM, JOSEPH M SANSOM, SARAH S 2701 LITTLE JOHN RD RALEIGH NC 27610-4227
153 1713538788 WRIGHT, SAMUEL L 744 LUNAR DR RALEIGH NC 27610-3429
154 1713924031 RALEIGH CITY OF PO BOX 590 RALEIGH NC 27602-0590
155 1723221143 STEWART, ROBERT EARL 1328 LONDONDERRY CIR RALEIGH NC 27610-4236
156 1713730084 BLAKE, MICHAEL JAMES SOUTHERN, JAMES MUNRO 15 E MARTIN ST RALEIGH NC 27601-1841
157 1713927283 TURNER, LYNN ORIS 1200 BEVERLY DR RALEIGH NC 27610-4206
158 1713636058 MITCHELL, PAUL ROSA 801 CARMEN CT RALEIGH NC 27610-3531
159 1713538917 WILLIAMS, MELVIN WILLIAMS, SUE A 732 LUNAR DR RALEIGH NC 27610-3429
160 1713926951 CHEEK, JAMES E CHEEK, SUSIE B 1008 BEVERLY DR RALEIGH NC 27610-3616
161 1723110763 GOODSON, DOUGLAS C GOODSON, JANICE B 1324 BEVERLY DR RALEIGH NC 27610-4208
162 1723016616 BARFIELD, EVELYN N 1304 BEVERLY DR RALEIGH NC 27610-4208
163 1713829223 THOMAS, JULIEN A ALLEN 5207 SLEEPY FALLS RUN KNIGHTDALE NC 27545-5101
164 1713920407 COOLEY, BERNICE W 2501 LITTLE JOHN RD RALEIGH NC 27610-4223
165 1713733249 RODRIGUEZ, JUAN F RODRIGUEZ, GLORIA M 905 BELMONT DR RALEIGH NC 27610-3523
166 1723129251 KAFKA, ANNA-VALERIA 1320 LONDONDERRY CIR RALEIGH NC 27610-4236
167 1713827562 SCHRADER FAMILY LTD PTNRP 5862 FARINGDON PL STE 1 RALEIGH NC 27609-4582
168 1713227709 NORTH CAROLINA STATE OF STATE PROPERTY OFFICE 116 W JONES ST RALEIGH NC 27603-1300
Date:Project/Site:Latitude:
Evaluator:County:Longitude:
Total Points:38.5
Stream is at least intermittent
if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = Absent Weak Strong Score01330132
0 1 3 2
0 1 3 3013101330132013000.5 1.5 000.5 1.5 1.5
3a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 9.5 0 1 3 301311.5 1 0 100.5 1.5 0.500.5 1.5 1
3
C. Biology Subtotal = 8.5 3 2 0 332030130013000.5 1.5 100.5 1.5 000.5 1.5 100.5 1.5 0.5
0*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: The channel is disturbed, with a narrow riparian buffer, lots of sedimentation, bars, and benches.
2
22. Fish 1
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0
23. Crayfish 124. Amphibians 125. Algae 1
21. Aquatic Mollusks 220. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 1
14. Leaf litter 0.515. Sediment on plants or debris 116. Organic debris lines or piles 117. Soil-based evidence of high water table?No = 0 Yes = 3
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 1
6. Depositional bars or benches 27. Recent alluvial deposits 2
10. Natural valley 1
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 2
8. Headcuts 29. Grade control 1
12. Presence of Baseflow 2
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple-pool sequence 2
4. Particle size of stream substrate 25. Active/relic floodplain 2
Other e.g. Quad Name:Raleigh East
20.5 Moderate
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 21a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 2
Stream Determination (circle one) Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
6/14/2018 Upper Walnut Creek Improvements - S1 35.762087
W. Sullivan, M. Richards, A. Hough (Kimley-Horn)Wake -78.588051
Date:Project/Site:Latitude:
Evaluator:County:Longitude:
Total Points:30.75
Stream is at least intermittent
if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = Absent Weak Strong Score01330131
0 1 3 1
0 1 3 1013301320131013000.5 1.5 000.5 1.5 1
0a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 10 0 1 3 201311.5 1 0 100.5 1.5 1.500.5 1.5 1.5
3
C. Biology Subtotal = 7.75 3 2 0 232030130013000.5 1.5 000.5 1.5 100.5 1.5 0.500.5 1.5 0.5
0.75*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: Stream S2 is a weak perennial reach with strong sedimentation and low to moderate flow. The stream eventually flows into Upper Walnut Creek.
2
22. Fish 1
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0
23. Crayfish 124. Amphibians 125. Algae 1
21. Aquatic Mollusks 220. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 1
14. Leaf litter 0.515. Sediment on plants or debris 116. Organic debris lines or piles 117. Soil-based evidence of high water table?No = 0 Yes = 3
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 1
6. Depositional bars or benches 27. Recent alluvial deposits 2
10. Natural valley 1
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 2
8. Headcuts 29. Grade control 1
12. Presence of Baseflow 2
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple-pool sequence 2
4. Particle size of stream substrate 25. Active/relic floodplain 2
Other e.g. Quad Name:Raleigh East
13 Moderate
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 21a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 2
Stream Determination (circle one) Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
6/14/2018 Upper Walnut Creek Improvements - S2 35.761266
W. Sullivan, M. Richards, A. Hough (Kimley-Horn)Wake -78.598177
Date:Project/Site:Latitude:
Evaluator:County:Longitude:
Total Points:38
Stream is at least intermittent
if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = Absent Weak Strong Score01330132
0 1 3 1
0 1 3 2013201330132013000.5 1.5 0.500.5 1.5 1
3a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 11 0 1 3 301321.5 1 0 100.5 1.5 100.5 1.5 1
3
C. Biology Subtotal = 7.5 3 2 0 332030130013000.5 1.5 000.5 1.5 000.5 1.5 0.500.5 1.5 1
0*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: Stream S3 is a strong perennial reach with a strong baseflow. Depositional bars/benches are present throughout the stream channel. The stream flows southeast and eventually flows into wetland W16.
2
22. Fish 1
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0
23. Crayfish 124. Amphibians 125. Algae 1
21. Aquatic Mollusks 220. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 1
14. Leaf litter 0.515. Sediment on plants or debris 116. Organic debris lines or piles 117. Soil-based evidence of high water table?No = 0 Yes = 3
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 1
6. Depositional bars or benches 27. Recent alluvial deposits 2
10. Natural valley 1
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 2
8. Headcuts 29. Grade control 1
12. Presence of Baseflow 2
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple-pool sequence 2
4. Particle size of stream substrate 25. Active/relic floodplain 2
Other e.g. Quad Name:Raleigh East
19.5 Moderate
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 21a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 2
Stream Determination (circle one) Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
6/14/2018 Upper Walnut Creek Improvements - S3 35.761685
W. Sullivan, M. Richards, A. Hough (Kimley-Horn)Wake -78.596901
Date:Project/Site:Latitude:
Evaluator:County:Longitude:
Total Points:21.5
Stream is at least intermittent
if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = Absent Weak Strong Score01320130
0 1 3 0
0 1 3 2013001310131013000.5 1.5 0.500.5 1.5 0.5
0a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 9.5 0 1 3 201331.5 1 0 0.500.5 1.5 0.500.5 1.5 0.5
3
C. Biology Subtotal = 5 3 2 0 132030130013000.5 1.5 000.5 1.5 000.5 1.5 0.500.5 1.5 0.5
0*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: Stream S4 is a short, intermittent channel originating at the adjacent culvert outlet. Stream S4 flows into stream S3.
2
22. Fish 1
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0
23. Crayfish 124. Amphibians 125. Algae 1
21. Aquatic Mollusks 220. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 1
14. Leaf litter 0.515. Sediment on plants or debris 116. Organic debris lines or piles 117. Soil-based evidence of high water table?No = 0 Yes = 3
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 1
6. Depositional bars or benches 27. Recent alluvial deposits 2
10. Natural valley 1
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 2
8. Headcuts 29. Grade control 1
12. Presence of Baseflow 2
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple-pool sequence 2
4. Particle size of stream substrate 25. Active/relic floodplain 2
Other e.g. Quad Name:Raleigh East
7 Moderate
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 21a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 2
Stream Determination (circle one) Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
6/14/2018 Upper Walnut Creek Improvements - S4 35.761842
W. Sullivan, M. Richards, A. Hough (Kimley-Horn)Wake -78.5969
Date:Project/Site:Latitude:
Evaluator:County:Longitude:
Total Points:24.5
Stream is at least intermittent
if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = Absent Weak Strong Score01320131
0 1 3 1
0 1 3 1013201310131013000.5 1.5 000.5 1.5 0.5
0a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 10 0 1 3 201331.5 1 0 100.5 1.5 0.500.5 1.5 0.5
3
C. Biology Subtotal = 5 3 2 0 232030130013000.5 1.5 000.5 1.5 000.5 1.5 000.5 1.5 0
0*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
6/14/2018 Upper Walnut Creek Improvements - S5 35.762680
W. Sullivan, M. Richards, A. Hough (Kimley-Horn)Wake -78.602815
Other e.g. Quad Name:Raleigh East
9.5 Moderate
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 21a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 2
Stream Determination (circle one) Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple-pool sequence 2
4. Particle size of stream substrate 25. Active/relic floodplain 2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 2
8. Headcuts 29. Grade control 1
12. Presence of Baseflow 2
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 27. Recent alluvial deposits 2
10. Natural valley 1
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 1
14. Leaf litter 0.515. Sediment on plants or debris 116. Organic debris lines or piles 117. Soil-based evidence of high water table?No = 0 Yes = 3
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 1
Stream S5 is a short, intermittent reach with an abundance of iron oxidizing bacteria that flows through a culvert under the greenway.
2
22. Fish 1
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0
23. Crayfish 124. Amphibians 125. Algae 1
21. Aquatic Mollusks 220. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
Date:Project/Site:Latitude:
Evaluator:County:Longitude:
Total Points:30.5
Stream is at least intermittent
if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = Absent Weak Strong Score01320132
0 1 3 2
0 1 3 1013201310132013000.5 1.5 0.500.5 1.5 1
0a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 11 0 1 3 301321.5 1 0 100.5 1.5 100.5 1.5 1
3
C. Biology Subtotal = 6 3 2 0 232030130013000.5 1.5 000.5 1.5 000.5 1.5 0.500.5 1.5 0.5
0*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: Stream S6 is a weak perennial reach with iron oxidizing bacteria throughout the channel and moderate flow.
2
22. Fish 1
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0
23. Crayfish 124. Amphibians 125. Algae 1
21. Aquatic Mollusks 220. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 1
14. Leaf litter 0.515. Sediment on plants or debris 116. Organic debris lines or piles 117. Soil-based evidence of high water table?No = 0 Yes = 3
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 1
6. Depositional bars or benches 27. Recent alluvial deposits 2
10. Natural valley 1
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 2
8. Headcuts 29. Grade control 1
12. Presence of Baseflow 2
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple-pool sequence 2
4. Particle size of stream substrate 25. Active/relic floodplain 2
Other e.g. Quad Name:Raleigh East
13.5 Moderate
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 21a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 2
Stream Determination (circle one) Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
6/14/2018 Upper Walnut Creek Improvements - S6 35.763147
W. Sullivan, M. Richards, A. Hough (Kimley-Horn)Wake -78.608257
Date:Project/Site:Latitude:
Evaluator:County:Longitude:
Total Points:22
Stream is at least intermittent
if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = Absent Weak Strong Score01320131
0 1 3 1
0 1 3 1013101300131013000.5 1.5 0.500.5 1.5 0
0a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 9.5 0 1 3 201321.5 1 0 100.5 1.5 100.5 1.5 0.5
3
C. Biology Subtotal = 5 3 2 0 232030130013000.5 1.5 000.5 1.5 000.5 1.5 000.5 1.5 0
0*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: Stream S7 is a short, intermittent reach that originates at a culvert outlet.
2
22. Fish 1
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0
23. Crayfish 124. Amphibians 125. Algae 1
21. Aquatic Mollusks 220. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 1
14. Leaf litter 0.515. Sediment on plants or debris 116. Organic debris lines or piles 117. Soil-based evidence of high water table?No = 0 Yes = 3
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 1
6. Depositional bars or benches 27. Recent alluvial deposits 2
10. Natural valley 1
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 2
8. Headcuts 29. Grade control 1
12. Presence of Baseflow 2
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple-pool sequence 2
4. Particle size of stream substrate 25. Active/relic floodplain 2
Other e.g. Quad Name:Raleigh East
7.5 Moderate
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 21a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 2
Stream Determination (circle one) Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
6/14/2018 Upper Walnut Creek Improvements - S7 35.763689
W. Sullivan, M. Richards, A. Hough (Kimley-Horn)Wake -78.608906
Date:Project/Site:Latitude:
Evaluator:County:Longitude:
Total Points:26
Stream is at least intermittent
if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = Absent Weak Strong Score01320131
0 1 3 1
0 1 3 2013201310131013000.5 1.5 0.500.5 1.5 0.5
0a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 10 0 1 3 201331.5 1 0 100.5 1.5 0.500.5 1.5 0.5
3
C. Biology Subtotal = 5 3 2 0 232030130013000.5 1.5 000.5 1.5 000.5 1.5 000.5 1.5 0
0*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
6/14/2018 Upper Walnut Creek Improvements - S8 35.765594
W. Sullivan, M. Richards, A. Hough (Kimley-Horn)Wake -78.610143
Other e.g. Quad Name:Raleigh East
11 Moderate
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 21a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 2
Stream Determination (circle one) Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple-pool sequence 2
4. Particle size of stream substrate 25. Active/relic floodplain 2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 2
8. Headcuts 29. Grade control 1
12. Presence of Baseflow 2
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 27. Recent alluvial deposits 2
10. Natural valley 1
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 1
14. Leaf litter 0.515. Sediment on plants or debris 116. Organic debris lines or piles 117. Soil-based evidence of high water table?No = 0 Yes = 3
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 1
Stream S8 is tied hydologically to the wetland across the greenway. The stream has low flow and iron oxidizing bacteria throughout the channel.
2
22. Fish 1
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0
23. Crayfish 124. Amphibians 125. Algae 1
21. Aquatic Mollusks 220. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
Date:Project/Site:Latitude:
Evaluator:County:Longitude:
Total Points:21
Stream is at least intermittent
if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = Absent Weak Strong Score01320131
0 1 3 1
0 1 3 1013101320131013000.5 1.5 0.500.5 1.5 0.5
0a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 7 0 1 3 101311.5 1 0 100.5 1.5 0.500.5 1.5 0.5
3
C. Biology Subtotal = 4 3 2 0 132030130013000.5 1.5 000.5 1.5 000.5 1.5 000.5 1.5 0
0*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: Stream S9 is an intermittent reach flowing north to south through the project area. S9 receives hydrologic input from the surrouding development and uplands. S9 flows south offsite before discharging into a large swamp offsite. No biology was observed.
2
22. Fish 1
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0
23. Crayfish 124. Amphibians 125. Algae 1
21. Aquatic Mollusks 220. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 1
14. Leaf litter 0.515. Sediment on plants or debris 116. Organic debris lines or piles 117. Soil-based evidence of high water table?No = 0 Yes = 3
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 1
6. Depositional bars or benches 27. Recent alluvial deposits 2
10. Natural valley 1
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 2
8. Headcuts 29. Grade control 1
12. Presence of Baseflow 2
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple-pool sequence 2
4. Particle size of stream substrate 25. Active/relic floodplain 2
Other e.g. Quad Name:Raleigh East
10 Moderate
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 21a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 2
Stream Determination (circle one) Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
9/30/2014 Upper Walnut Creek Improvements - S9 35.763768
J. Hartshorn (KHA)Wake -78.617706
Date:Project/Site:Latitude:
Evaluator:County:Longitude:
Total Points:27
Stream is at least intermittent
if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = Absent Weak Strong Score01320132
0 1 3 1
0 1 3 1013301320131013000.5 1.5 0.500.5 1.5 0.5
0a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 9 0 1 3 101331.5 1 0 1.500.5 1.5 000.5 1.5 0.5
3
C. Biology Subtotal = 5 3 2 0 232030130013000.5 1.5 000.5 1.5 000.5 1.5 000.5 1.5 0
0*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: Stream S10 is an intermittent channel in a wide floodplain network with multiple streams braiding out. Hydrology is likely modified (natural or artificial) and flows through the adjacent stream. Water is pooled throughout the stream and iron oxidizing bacteria is thick in the channel.
2
22. Fish 1
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0
23. Crayfish 124. Amphibians 125. Algae 1
21. Aquatic Mollusks 220. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 1
14. Leaf litter 0.515. Sediment on plants or debris 116. Organic debris lines or piles 117. Soil-based evidence of high water table?No = 0 Yes = 3
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 1
6. Depositional bars or benches 27. Recent alluvial deposits 2
10. Natural valley 1
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 2
8. Headcuts 29. Grade control 1
12. Presence of Baseflow 2
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple-pool sequence 2
4. Particle size of stream substrate 25. Active/relic floodplain 2
Other e.g. Quad Name:Raleigh East
13 Moderate
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 21a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 2
Stream Determination (circle one) Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
5/9/2019 Upper Walnut Creek Improvements - S10 35.765651
J. Hartshorn, W. Sullivan, M. Richards (KHA)Wake -78.610566
Date:Project/Site:Latitude:
Evaluator:County:Longitude:
Total Points:21
Stream is at least intermittent
if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = Absent Weak Strong Score01320131
0 1 3 1
0 1 3 1013201310130013000.5 1.5 000.5 1.5 1
0a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 8 0 1 3 101331.5 1 0 000.5 1.5 0.500.5 1.5 0.5
3
C. Biology Subtotal = 4 3 2 0 132030130013000.5 1.5 000.5 1.5 000.5 1.5 000.5 1.5 0
0*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: Stream S11 is a low-flow intermittent channel that is choked with iron oxidizing bacteria. Hydrology appears to have shifted away from the channel to the adjacent stream.
2
22. Fish 1
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0
23. Crayfish 124. Amphibians 125. Algae 1
21. Aquatic Mollusks 220. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 1
14. Leaf litter 0.515. Sediment on plants or debris 116. Organic debris lines or piles 117. Soil-based evidence of high water table?No = 0 Yes = 3
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 1
6. Depositional bars or benches 27. Recent alluvial deposits 2
10. Natural valley 1
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 2
8. Headcuts 29. Grade control 1
12. Presence of Baseflow 2
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple-pool sequence 2
4. Particle size of stream substrate 25. Active/relic floodplain 2
Other e.g. Quad Name:Raleigh East
9 Moderate
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 21a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 2
Stream Determination (circle one) Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
5/9/2019 Upper Walnut Creek Improvements - S11 35.765739
J. Hartshorn, W. Sullivan, M. Richards (KHA)Wake -78.610514
Date:Project/Site:Latitude:
Evaluator:County:Longitude:
Total Points:34.5
Stream is at least intermittent
if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = Absent Weak Strong Score01320132
0 1 3 2
0 1 3 2013201330132013100.5 1.5 0.500.5 1.5 1
0a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 11 0 1 3 301321.5 1 0 100.5 1.5 100.5 1.5 1
3
C. Biology Subtotal = 6 3 2 0 332030130013000.5 1.5 000.5 1.5 000.5 1.5 000.5 1.5 0
0*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: Stream S12 is a perennial reach of stream S12 that originates at a headcut. The stream is incised and has heavy flow, which is evidenced by scours and wrack lines.
2
22. Fish 1
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0
23. Crayfish 124. Amphibians 125. Algae 1
21. Aquatic Mollusks 220. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 1
14. Leaf litter 0.515. Sediment on plants or debris 116. Organic debris lines or piles 117. Soil-based evidence of high water table?No = 0 Yes = 3
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 1
6. Depositional bars or benches 27. Recent alluvial deposits 2
10. Natural valley 1
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 2
8. Headcuts 29. Grade control 1
12. Presence of Baseflow 2
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple-pool sequence 2
4. Particle size of stream substrate 25. Active/relic floodplain 2
Other e.g. Quad Name:Raleigh East
17.5 Moderate
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 21a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 2
Stream Determination (circle one) Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
5/9/2019 Upper Walnut Creek Improvements - S12 35.764400
J. Hartshorn, W. Sullivan, M. Richards (KHA)Wake -78.61421
Date:Project/Site:Latitude:
Evaluator:County:Longitude:
Total Points:30.5
Stream is at least intermittent
if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = Absent Weak Strong Score01330132
0 1 3 1
0 1 3 2013101320131013000.5 1.5 0.500.5 1.5 1
0a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 9 0 1 3 301301.5 1 0 1.500.5 1.5 0.500.5 1.5 1
3
C. Biology Subtotal = 8 3 2 0 332030131013000.5 1.5 0.500.5 1.5 000.5 1.5 0.500.5 1.5 0
0*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: Stream S13 an encised perennial stream draining an urban watershed. The stream has good flow and sandy substrate.
2
22. Fish 1
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5; Other = 0
23. Crayfish 124. Amphibians 125. Algae 1
21. Aquatic Mollusks 220. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 1
14. Leaf litter 0.515. Sediment on plants or debris 116. Organic debris lines or piles 117. Soil-based evidence of high water table?No = 0 Yes = 3
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 1
6. Depositional bars or benches 27. Recent alluvial deposits 2
10. Natural valley 1
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 2
8. Headcuts 29. Grade control 1
12. Presence of Baseflow 2
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple-pool sequence 2
4. Particle size of stream substrate 25. Active/relic floodplain 2
Other e.g. Quad Name:Raleigh East
13.5 Moderate
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 21a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 2
Stream Determination (circle one) Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
5/9/2019 Upper Walnut Creek Improvements - S13 35.762638
J. Hartshorn, W. Sullivan, M. Richards (KHA)Wake -78.588621
Date:Project/Site:Latitude:
Evaluator:County:Longitude:
Total Points:32.5
Stream is at least intermittent
if ≥ 19 or perennial if ≥ 30
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = Absent Weak Strong Score01320132
0 1 3 1
0 1 3 3013201330132013100.5 1.5 0.500.5 1.5 0.5
0a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology Subtotal = 8.5 0 1 3 201311.5 1 0 100.5 1.5 100.5 1.5 0.5
3
C. Biology Subtotal = 7 3 2 0 2
3 2 0 3
0 1 3 0
0 1 3 0
0 0.5 1.5 0
0 0.5 1.5 0
0 0.5 1.5 000.5 1.5 0.5
1.5*perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
North Carolina Division of Water Quality - Stream Identification Form, Version 4.11
10/17/2016 Upper Walnut Creek Improvements - S14 34.7624
J. Hartshorn (KHA), L. Virtaranta (KHA)Wake -78.5873
Other e.g. Quad Name:Raleigh East
17 Moderate
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg 2
1a. Continuity of channel bed and bank 2
Stream Determination (circle one) Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
3. In-channel structure: ex. riffle-pool, step-pool, ripple-pool sequence 2
4. Particle size of stream substrate 25. Active/relic floodplain 2
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria 2
8. Headcuts 29. Grade control 1
12. Presence of Baseflow 2
11. Second or greater order channel No = 0 Yes = 3
6. Depositional bars or benches 27. Recent alluvial deposits 2
10. Natural valley 1
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed 1
14. Leaf litter 0.515. Sediment on plants or debris 116. Organic debris lines or piles 117. Soil-based evidence of high water table?No = 0 Yes = 3
18. Fibrous roots in streambed 1
Down stream of the easement, S14 is downcut and encised. The stream passes through 24" HDPE piping as it crosses over the pre-existing sewerline easement.
2
22. Fish 1
26. Wetland plants in streambed FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 ; Other = 0
23. Crayfish 124. Amphibians 125. Algae 1
21. Aquatic Mollusks 220. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
Project/Site:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation , Soil X , or Hydrology Yes X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
XNo
XNo X
XNo
X
X X
X
X
X
X X
X
Yes X
Yes X
Yes X X
Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Surface Water Present?
Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Remarks:
Field Observations:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (B5)
City/County:Upper Walnut Creek Improvements Raleigh/Wake County
W1-WET
6/14/2018
City of Raleigh NC
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
No
Section, Township, Range: n/aW. Sullivan, M. Richards, A. Hough (Kimley-Horn)
0-2%ConcaveHeadwater seep
Datum: NAD83-78.59026835.760526LRR P, MLRA 136
n/aNWI classification:LoC- Louisburg loamy sand
Slope (%):
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
0
0
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
Wetland W1 receives hydrology from surrounding upland runoff.

NoYes
2
Is the Sampled Area
Wetland W1 is a headwater seep that originates at a culvert outlet and drains downslope to a stream offsite. The wetland is located on top of a
concrete flume.
HYDROLOGY
Yes
Yes
Yes
Hydric Soil Present?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Nowithin a Wetland? Yes
No
No
Water Table Present?
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
7.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 2 =
1.x 3 =
2.x 4 =
3.x 5 =
4.Column Totals: (B)
5.
6.
7.
8.X
9.X
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:Yes X
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
No
W1-WET
4
4
FACU species
UPL species
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
0
105
0
60
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute
% Cover
100.0%
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
Tree Stratum
)
=Total Cover
Platanus occidentalis
Acer rubrum
30 )
10
Indicator
Status
5
5
Dominant
Species?
Boehmeria cylindrica
Yes
No
20Polygonum pensylvanicum
5Juncus effusus FACW
Saururus cernuus 20
30
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
=Total Cover
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
30 )
50
FACWNo
1025
5
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
5
0
(A)
(B)
(A)
15
20
0
Multiply by:
70
1.75Prevalence Index = B/A =
35
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.
5220
Yes
Yes
FAC
FACW
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
)30
=Total Cover
OBL
FACW
Yes
=Total Cover
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
X
Depth (inches):X
Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
No
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
% Texture
W1-WETSOIL
Type1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox FeaturesDepth
(inches) Color (moist)Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
%
Matrix
10YR 4/1
10YR 2/1
2-4
0-2
Loc2
100
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
100
Color (moist)
Sampling Point:
Yes
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Remarks:
The soils are disturbed on top of a concrete bed, with a thin layer of hydric soils.
Hydric Soil Present?
Type:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Project/Site:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
No X
No X X
No X
Yes X
Yes X
Yes X X
Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Surface Water Present?
Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Remarks:
Field Observations:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (B5)
City/County:Upper Walnut Creek Improvements Raleigh/Wake County
W1-UP
6/14/2018
City of Raleigh NC
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
No
Section, Township, Range: n/aW. Sullivan, M. Richards, A. Hough (Kimley-Horn)
5-10%NoneHeadwater seep
Datum: NAD83-78.59026835.760526LRR P, MLRA 136
n/aNWI classification:LoC- Louisburg loamy sand
Slope (%):
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
No primary or secondary indicators of hydrology were present.

NoYes
Is the Sampled Area
The upland point was taken above the culvert from wetland W1 on a steep hillslope.
HYDROLOGY
Yes
Yes
Yes
Hydric Soil Present?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Nowithin a Wetland? Yes
No
No
Water Table Present?
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
7.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 2 =
1.x 3 =
2.x 4 =
3.x 5 =
4.Column Totals: (B)
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:Yes
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
No
W1-UP
1
7
FACU species
UPL species
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
425
580
85
125
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
FACU
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
5
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute
% Cover
14.3%
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
15
Ligustrum sinense
Tree Stratum
)
=Total Cover
Pyrus calleryana
30 )
5
Indicator
Status
5
Dominant
Species?
Yes
5
No10
10
Phytolacca americana
Trifolium repens
Festuca sp 80
30
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
FAC
FACU
=Total Cover
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
30 )
Lonicera japonica
90
18
38
45
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
5
35
(A)
(B)
(A)
15
0
140
Multiply by:
0
4.64Prevalence Index = B/A =
0
Yes FACU
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.
310
Yes UPL
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
)30
=Total Cover
UPL
FACU
Yes
38
=Total Cover
5
15
Vitis rotundifolia
5Yes
Yes
YesParthenocissus quinquefolia
FACU
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Depth (inches):X
Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
No
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
%
Distinct redox concentrations
Texture
10 M
W1-UPSOIL
Type1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox FeaturesDepth
(inches) Color (moist)Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
%
Matrix
10YR 4/4 7.5YR 5/60-12
Loc2
Loamy/Clayey90 C
Color (moist)
Sampling Point:
Yes
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present?
Type:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Project/Site:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
XNo
XNo X
XNo
X X
X
X
X
Yes X
Yes X
Yes X X
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
The wetlands receive hydrology primarily from Walnut Creek flooding events and runoff from the adjacent small hillslopes.

NoYes
Is the Sampled Area
Wetlands W2-W7, W17 and W18 are floodplain wetlands and the wetland point was generated from wetland W7.
HYDROLOGY
Yes
Yes
Yes
Hydric Soil Present?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Nowithin a Wetland? Yes
No
No
Water Table Present?
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
8
0
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
City/County:Upper Walnut Creek Improvements Raleigh/Wake County
W2-W7/W17/W18 WET
6/14/2018
City of Raleigh NC
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
No
Section, Township, Range: n/aW. Sullivan, M. Richards, A. Hough (Kimley-Horn)
0-2%ConcaveFloodplain
Datum: NAD83-78.590268 35.765080LRR P, MLRA 136
PFO1CNWI classification:LoC- Louisburg loamy sand, CeC2, CeB2, CeF- Cecil sandy loam, Cn- Calfax sandy loam, Ro- Roanoke fine sandy loam
Slope (%):Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Surface Water Present?
Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Remarks:
Field Observations:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (B5)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
7.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 2 =
1.x 3 =
2.x 4 =
3.x 5 =
4.Column Totals: (B)
5.
6.
7.
8.X
9.X
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:Yes X
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
The wetland areas are disturbed.
)30
=Total Cover
FAC
FACW
Yes
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.
25 10 0
Yes
Yes
FACW
FAC
345
0
80
Multiply by:
70
2.91Prevalence Index = B/A =
35
Yes FAC
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
115
20
(A)
(B)
(A)
18
615
45
30
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
=Total Cover
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
30 )
90
Yes
Yes
20
20
Sambucus nigra
Polygonum pensylvanicum
20Carex spp.FAC
Fescue spp.50
30
Ligustrum sinense
Tree Stratum
)
=Total Cover
Acer rubrum
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
30 )
50
Indicator
Status
35
15
Dominant
Species?
Yes
10
FACU
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute
% Cover
85.7%
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
No
W7/W17/W18 W
6
7
FACU species
UPL species
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
0
495
0
170
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
X
Depth (inches):X
Sampling Point:
Yes
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present?
Type:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Loc2
100
Loamy/Clayey
Loamy/Clayey
60 C
Color (moist)
Matrix
10YR 5/1
10YR 4/1 10YR 5/4
16-24
0-16
W7/W17/W18 SOIL
Type1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox FeaturesDepth
(inches) Color (moist)Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
%%
Distinct redox concentrations
Texture
40 M
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
No
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Project/Site:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
No X
No X X
No X
Yes X
Yes X
Yes X X
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)
Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)
Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)
Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)
Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
No primary or secondary indicators of hydrology were present.

NoYes
Is the Sampled Area
The upland point was taken on the greenway easement, adjacent to wetland W7.
HYDROLOGY
Yes
Yes
Yes
Hydric Soil Present?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Nowithin a Wetland? Yes
No
No
Water Table Present?
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
City/County:Upper Walnut Creek Improvements Raleigh/Wake County
W2-W7/W17/W18 UP
6/14/2018
City of Raleigh NC
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
No
Section, Township, Range: n/aW. Sullivan, M. Richards, A. Hough (Kimley-Horn)
1-2%NoneSlight hillslope
Datum: NAD83-78.609543 35.765080LRR P, MLRA 136
n/aNWI classification:LoC- Louisburg loamy sand, CeC2, CeB2, CeF- Cecil sandy loam, Cn- Calfax sandy loam, Ro- Roanoke fine sandy loam
Slope (%):Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Surface Water Present?
Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? (If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Remarks:
Field Observations:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (B5)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
7.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover: x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 2 =
1.x 3 =
2.x 4 =
3.x 5 =
4.Column Totals: (B)
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover: 20% of total cover:Yes X
=Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
)30
=Total Cover
UPL
FACU
Yes
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.
0
30
0
40
Multiply by:
0
4.60Prevalence Index = B/A =
0
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
10
10
(A)
(B)
(A)
UPLNo
1538
5
30
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
=Total Cover
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
30 )
75
Rumex acetosella
No
No
10Trifolium repens
10Carex spp.FAC
Festuca spp.50
Tree Stratum
)
=Total Cover
30 )
Indicator
Status
Dominant
Species?
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft
(1 m) tall.
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute
% Cover
0.0%
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
No
2-W7/W17/W18
0
1
FACU species
UPL species
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
275
345
55
75
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Depth (inches):X
Sampling Point:
Yes
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Remarks:
Hydric Soil Present?
Type:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Stratified Layers (A5)
Loc2
Loamy/Clayey100
Color (moist)
Matrix
10YR 4/40-6
W7/W17/W18SOIL
Type1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox FeaturesDepth
(inches) Color (moist)Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
%%
Could not augar belwo 6" because of rock
Texture
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
No
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Raleigh/Wake County
W8-WET
n/a
35.762272 -78.587621
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì
The data collection point was taken at the confluence of wetland W8 and stream S14.NOAA/NWS
recorded 0.53" of rainfall 48 hours prior to the field evaluation.
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì ì
The data collection point was taken within the confluence of S14. The area is a large alluvial wash
and pockets of standing water are present throughout wetland WA.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
W8-WET
ì
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10)(MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)(MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9)(MLRA 147, 148)(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3)(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10)(LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)(LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12)(LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13)(MLRA 136, 122)3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21)(MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
W8-WET
ì
ì
ì
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Raleigh/Wake County
W8-UP
n/a
35.762202 -78.587400
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì
The upland ridge is approximately 20' upland and 1.5' above wetland W8. NOAA/NWS recorded
0.53" of rainfall 48 hours prior to the field evaluation.
ì
ì
ì ì
There were no indicators of wetland hydrology observed. Neither saturation nor the water table
were observed within 24" of the surface.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
W8-UP
ì
The upland ridge has dense canopy cover and an herbaceous layer dominated by microstegium.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10)(MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)(MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9)(MLRA 147, 148)(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3)(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10)(LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)(LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12)(LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13)(MLRA 136, 122)3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21)(MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
W8-UP
ì
There are no hydric soil indicators present. Neither saturation nor the water table occur within the
upper 24" of the soil profile. There is large black organic debris found in the soil below a depth of
20".
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present?Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present?Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Raleigh/Wake County
W9/W16-WET
n/a
35.759612 -78.592200
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì
The data point was taken in wetland W9. Wetlands W9 and W16 are within the floodplain of an
offsite stream. NOAA/NWS recorded 0.53" of rainfall 48 hours prior to the field evaluation.
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì ì
The floodplain is likely seasonally inundated. Flood flows from the adjacent, off-site creek sustain
hydrology.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
W9/W16-WET
ì
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10)(MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)(MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9)(MLRA 147, 148)(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3)(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10)(LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)(LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12)(LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13)(MLRA 136, 122)3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21)(MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
W9/W16-WET
ì
ì
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present?Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present?Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Raleigh/Wake County
W9/W16-UP
n/a
35.7597 -78.5923
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì
The upland point was taken approximately 20' up the hillslope of wetland W9. Wetland W9 and W16 are
wetlands in the floodplain of an offsite stream. NOAA/NWS recorded 0.53" of rainfall 48 hours prior to the
field evaluation.
ì
ì
ì ì
There are no indicators of wetland hydrology present. Saturation and the water table occur below
18" of the soil surface.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
W9/W16-UP
ì
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10)(MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)(MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9)(MLRA 147, 148)(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3)(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10)(LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)(LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12)(LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13)(MLRA 136, 122)3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21)(MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
W9/W16-UP
ì
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Raleigh/Wake County
W10-WET
n/a
Depression None 0-1%
35.763110 -78.604379
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì
Wetland W10 is located between the adjacent residential development and adjacent green-way.
NOAA/NWS recorded 0.53" of rainfall 48 hours prior to the field evaluation.
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì ì
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
W10-WET
ì
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10)(MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)(MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9)(MLRA 147, 148)(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3)(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10)(LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)(LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12)(LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13)(MLRA 136, 122)3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21)(MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
W10-WET
ì
ì
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Raleigh/Wake County
W10-UP
Slight hillslope None 1-2%
35.763146 -78.604479
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì ì
There are no indicators of wetland hydrology present. Saturation and the water table occur below
18" of the soil surface.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
W10-UP
ì
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10)(MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)(MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9)(MLRA 147, 148)(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3)(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10)(LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)(LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12)(LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13)(MLRA 136, 122)3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21)(MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
W10-UP
ì
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Raleigh/Wake County
W11-WET
n/a
35.7650 -78.6095 NAD 83
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì
Wetland W11 is a floodplain to a tributary of Walnut Creek. The wetland is bounded by a distinct break in
topography. The low-lying areas are seasonally inundated. W11 is separated from W12 by a walkway that
dissects the wetland system. NOAA/NWS recorded 0.53" of rainfall 48 hours prior to the field evaluation.
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì ì
The floodplain is likely seasonally inundated. Flooding flows from the adjacent, offsite creek and
sustains the wetland's hydrology.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
W11-WET
ì
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10)(MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)(MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9)(MLRA 147, 148)(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3)(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10)(LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)(LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12)(LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13)(MLRA 136, 122)3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21)(MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
W11-WET
ì
ì
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Raleigh/Wake County
W11-UP
n/a
35.7650 -78.6093
ì
ì ì
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì ì
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
W11-UP
ì
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10)(MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)(MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9)(MLRA 147, 148)(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3)(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10)(LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)(LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12)(LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13)(MLRA 136, 122)3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21)(MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
W11-UP
ì
The upper 6" of the soil profile appears to be disturbed. This is likely a result from the
fill/construction of the greenway and sewerline. Below 6", the soil is uniform, a likely indicator of
historical disturbance. There are no hydric soil indicators present.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present?Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present?Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Raleigh/Wake County
W12-WET
n/a
35.7640 -78.6124 NAD 83
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì
Wetland W12 is a floodplain to a tributary of Walnut Creek. The wetland is bounded by a distinct break in
topography. The low-lying areas are seasonally inundated. NOAA/NWS recorded 0.53" of rainfall 48 hours
prior to the field evaluation.
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì ì
The floodplain is likely seasonally inundated. Flooding flows from the adjacent, offsite creek and
sustains the wetland's hydrology.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
W12-WET
ì
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10)(MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)(MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9)(MLRA 147, 148)(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3)(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10)(LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)(LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12)(LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13)(MLRA 136, 122)3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21)(MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
W12-WET
ì
ì
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present?Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present?Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Raleigh/Wake County
W12-UP
n/a
35.7640 -78.6126 NAD 83
ì
ì ì
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì ì
No primary or secondary indicators were observed. Saturation and the water table occur below 18"
of the surface.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
W12-UP
ì
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10)(MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)(MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9)(MLRA 147, 148)(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3)(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10)(LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)(LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12)(LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13)(MLRA 136, 122)3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21)(MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
W12-UP
ì
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present?Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present?Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Raleigh/Wake County
W13-WET
n/a
35.7644 -78.6141 NAD 83
N/A
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì
Wetland W13 is a floodplain to a tributary of Walnut Creek. The wetland is bounded by a distinct break in
topography. The low-lying areas are seasonally inundated. NOAA/NWS recorded 0.53" of rainfall 48 hours
prior to the field evaluation.
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì ì
The floodplain is likely seasonally inundated. Flooding flows from the adjacent, offsite creek that
sustains the wetland's hydrology.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
W13-WET
ì
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10)(MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)(MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9)(MLRA 147, 148)(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3)(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10)(LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)(LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12)(LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13)(MLRA 136, 122)3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21)(MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
W13-WET
ì
ì
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
Project/Site: City/County: Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner: State: Sampling Point:
Investigator(s): Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Local relief (concave, convex, none): Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: NWI classification:
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are “Normal Circumstances” present? Yes No
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No
Hydric Soil Present?Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Is the Sampled Area
within a Wetland? Yes No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)
Surface Water (A1) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
High Water Table (A2) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Drainage Patterns (B10)
Saturation (A3) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Water Marks (B1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) Dry-Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (B2) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (B3) Thin Muck Surface (C7) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Other (Explain in Remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (B5) Geomorphic Position (D2)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (B13) FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches):
Saturation Present?Yes No Depth (inches):
(includes capillary fringe)
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
Raleigh/Wake County
W13-UP
n/a
35.7644 -78.6141 NAD 83
N/A
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì
ì
The upland point was taken approximately 10 feet from and 2 feet higher in elevation from
wetland W13. NOAA/NWS recorded 0.53" of rainfall 48 hours prior to the field evaluation.
ì
ì
ì ì
No primary or secondary indicators were observed. Saturation and the water table occur below 18"
of the surface.
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
VEGETATION (Four Strata) – Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point:____________
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) % Cover Species? Status
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
= Total Cover
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
= Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: )
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
= Total Cover
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A)
Total Number of Dominant
Species Across All Strata: (B)
Percent of Dominant Species
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
OBL species x 1 =
FACW species x 2 =
FAC species x 3 =
FACU species x 4 =
UPL species x 5 =
Column Totals: (A) (B)
Prevalence Index = B/A =
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
3 - Prevalence Index is 3.01
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1
m) tall.
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
W13-UP
ì
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point:
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type1 Loc2 Texture Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
Hydric Soil Indicators:Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
Histosol (A1) Dark Surface (S7) 2 cm Muck (A10)(MLRA 147)
Histic Epipedon (A2) Polyvalue Below Surface (S8)(MLRA 147, 148) Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3) Thin Dark Surface (S9)(MLRA 147, 148)(MLRA 147, 148)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Matrix (F3)(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10)(LRR N) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Other (Explain in Remarks)
Thick Dark Surface (A12) Redox Depressions (F8)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)(LRR N, Iron-Manganese Masses (F12)(LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)MLRA 136)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Umbric Surface (F13)(MLRA 136, 122)3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5) Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148) wetland hydrology must be present,
Stripped Matrix (S6) Red Parent Material (F21)(MLRA 127, 147) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches):Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks:
W13-UP
ì
Project/Site:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation X , Soil X , or Hydrology Yes X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
X No
X No X X
X No
X
X
X
Yes X
Yes X
Yes X X
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Geomorphic Position (D2)Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Hydrology was held in the upper portion of W14 by the sewer line and easement fill. Water seeps slowly across the easement creating soil saturation; however, a water table was not found within 14 inches of the soil surface.

NoYes
0
Is the Sampled Area
Wetland W14 is a seep wetland crossing a sanitary sewer easement and draining into the larger floodplain associated with Walnut Creek. W14 is bounded by topography on two sides and hydrology is impounded by the sewer line.
HYDROLOGY
Yes
YesYesHydric Soil Present?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?Nowithin a Wetland?Yes
NoNoWater Table Present?
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
140
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
City/County:Upper Walnut Creek Improvements Raleigh/Wake County
W14-WET
9/11/2019
City of Raleigh NC
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
No
Section, Township, Range:RaleighJ. Hartshorn, M. Richards (Kimley-Horn)
<1%concaveSewer Easement
Datum:NAD 83-78.62352335.760488LRR P, MLRA 136
n/aNWI classification:RgC - Rawlings-Rion Complex, ChA - Chewlacla and Wehadkee
Slope (%):Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Surface Water Present?
Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?(If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Remarks:
Field Observations:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (B5)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
7.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 2 =
1.x 3 =
2.x 4 =
3.x 5 =
4.Column Totals:(B)
5.
6.
7.
8.X
9.
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:Yes X3
=Total Cover5
5 Yes FAC
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)The wetland is within an easement. The canopy has been modified and cleared.
)30
=Total Cover
FAC
UPL
Yes
1
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.
10 4 0
Yes
Yes
FAC
FAC
255
0
0
Multiply by:
40
3.16Prevalence Index = B/A =
20
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
85
0
(A)
(B)
(A)
No
20
25
50
Typha
5
5
30
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
=Total Cover
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
30 )
Vitis rotundifolia
100
Peltandra
No
Yes
No
20
10
Rhus aromatica
10Juncus effusus FACW
Microstegium vimineum 60
10
Fraxinus pennsylvanica
Tree Stratum
)
=Total Cover
Acer negundo
Acer rubrum
30 )
20
Indicator Status
10
10
Dominant Species?
Yes FACW
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute % Cover
83.3%Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
No
W14-WET
5
6
FACU species
UPL species
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
100
395
20
125
Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
X
Depth (inches):X X
Sampling Point:
Yes
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Remarks:Soils were saturated at the surface and no water table was observed. However, the vegetation within the wetland is highly hydrophytic.
Hydric Soil Present?
Type:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Stratified Layers (A5)
Loc2
M
90
Loamy/Clayey
Sandy
Loamy/Clayey
100
Color (moist)
5
Matrix
C10YR 4/1
10YR 3/2
10YR 3/22-8
0-2
W14-WETSOIL
8-14 10YR 2/1
Type1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
95
Redox FeaturesDepth(inches)Color (moist)Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
10GY 5/1
%%
M10
Texture
sandy loam; gravel present
D
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
No
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Project/Site:Sampling Date:
Applicant/Owner:State:Sampling Point:
Investigator(s):
Landform (hillside, terrace, etc.):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA):Lat:Long:
Soil Map Unit Name:
X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology Yes X
Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS – Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
No X
No X X
No X
Yes X
Yes X
Yes X X
Surface Water (A1)
High Water Table (A2)Saturation (A3)
Water Marks (B1)Sediment Deposits (B2)
Drift Deposits (B3)
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Surface Soil Cracks (B6)Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8)
Drainage Patterns (B10)Moss Trim Lines (B16)
Dry-Season Water Table (C2)Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Geomorphic Position (D2)Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7)
Water-Stained Leaves (B9)Aquatic Fauna (B13)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
No primary or secondary indicators of hydrology were observed.

NoYes
Is the Sampled Area
The upland point was taken approximately 40 feet from and 2 feet higher in elevation from wetland W14. The upland area is adjacent to a roadside and is well-maintained.
HYDROLOGY
Yes
YesYesHydric Soil Present?
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?Nowithin a Wetland?Yes
NoNoWater Table Present?
Remarks:
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Depth (inches):
Depth (inches):Depth (inches):
No
Saturation Present?
(includes capillary fringe)
City/County:Upper Walnut Creek Improvements Raleigh/Wake County
W14-UP
9/11/2019
City of Raleigh NC
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA SHEET – Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region
No
Section, Township, Range:n/aJ. Hartshorn, M. Richards (Kimley-Horn)
0-2%ConvexHeadwater seep
Datum:NAD 83-78.62317635.760410LRR P, MLRA 136
n/aNWI classification:RgC - Rawlings-Rion Complex, ChA - Chewlacla and Wehadkee
Slope (%):Local relief (concave, convex, none):
Surface Water Present?
Yes NoAre climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year?(If no, explain in Remarks.)
significantly disturbed?
naturally problematic?
Are “Normal Circumstances” present?
(If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
Remarks:
Field Observations:
True Aquatic Plants (B14)
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1)Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Thin Muck Surface (C7)Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (B5)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Sampling Point:
(Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.(A/B)
7.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:x 1 =
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:x 2 =
1.x 3 =
2.x 4 =
3.x 5 =
4.Column Totals:(B)
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
4 - Morphological Adaptations1 (Provide supporting
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Herb Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
50% of total cover:20% of total cover:Yes X40
=Total Cover
20
80
Wisteria sinensis
20 Yes
Yes
YesLonicera japonica
UPL
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)The upland area is well maintained along the forested edge.
)30
=Total Cover
UPL
FAC
Yes
Toxicodendron radicans 20 Yes FAC
16
1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
2 - Dominance Test is >50%
VEGETATION (Four Strata)– Use scientific names of plants.
35 14 0
Yes
Yes
FAC
FAC
390
0
300
Multiply by:
0
3.82Prevalence Index = B/A =
0
FACU
Yes FACU
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of:
130
75
(A)
(B)
(A)
No
18
923
45
30
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Woody Vine – All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present?
UPL
FACU
=Total Cover
Herb – All herbaceous (non-woody) plants, regardless of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
30 )
Pueraria montana
90
Yes
No
40
30
Phytolacca americana
Microstegium vimineum
10Eupatorium capillifolium FACU
Festuca sp 40
45
Juglans nigra
Ligustrum sinense
Tree Stratum
)
=Total Cover
Acer negundo
Pinus taeda
30 )
70
Indicator Status
50
20
Dominant Species?
Yes
10
5
FACU
OBL species
FACW species
FAC species
20
Sapling/Shrub – Woody plants, excluding vines, less than 3 in. DBH and greater than or equal to 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Tree – Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of height.
1Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Absolute % Cover
40.0%Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
3 - Prevalence Index is ≤3.01
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation1 (Explain)
No
W14-UP
4
10
FACU species
UPL species
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
400
1090
80
285
Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata:
Dominance Test worksheet:
Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0
Depth (inches):X
Sampling Point:
Yes
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Remarks:No hydric soil indicators, saturation or water table were observed. Soils were rocky and compacted from fill or easement construction. Could not remove the soil sample past 6 inches.
Hydric Soil Present?
Type:
Histosol (A1)
Histic Epipedon (A2)Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)Stratified Layers (A5)
Loc2
Sandy100
Color (moist)Matrix
5YR 3/30-6
W14-UPSOIL
Type1
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Redox FeaturesDepth(inches)Color (moist)Remarks
1Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains.2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix.
%%
sandy loam; gravel present
Texture
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (A12)Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1)
Sandy Redox (S5)
Stripped Matrix (S6)
Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 122, 136)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)MLRA 136)
Dark Surface (S7)unless disturbed or problematic.Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147, 148)
No
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (MLRA 136)
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (F22)
Red Parent Material (F21)
(outside MLRA 127, 147, 148)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont – Version 2.0