19991172 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_19991020

Environmental Consultants
TRANSMITTAL LETTER
TO
Mr. John Dorney
NC Division of Water Quality
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607,
Mr. Ken Jolly
U.S. Army Corp of Engineers
6508 Falls of the Neuse. Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
WE ARE SENDING ATTACHED D UNDER SEPARATE COVER VIA
Plans 0 Contracts 0 Letters
Prints D Literature D Other:
Copies 0 Samples

COPIES DATED DESCRIPTION
1 11-13-2000 Receipt from WRP
THESE ARE BEING SENT:
D As per your request = For your comments 0 For your signature
CJ For your review ® For your use/files 0 For your
NOTES
Enclosed is the receipt for contributions to the N.C Wetlands Restoration Program as per
your authorization for the above-referenced permit.
COPY TO SIGNAT
Mr. Don Garner, Isakson-Barnhart
Chuck Roadley, Reg. S ec./Project Manager]
3000 Easter Circle • Williamsburg, Virginia 23188 • [phone] • FAX [phone]
DATE"
November 14, 2000
RE
Proof of Mitigation
USACOE # 200020130, NCDWQ 4 99-1172

Vgmsbg Envir?, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
A
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES

NCDENR N 0V 13 2000
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
RECEIVED RECEIPT
November 6, 2000
JAMES B. HUNT JR.
GOVERNOR
Mr. Donald Garner
Isakson-Barnhart
BILL HOLMAN
SECRETARY
25 Technology Parkway South
Suite 201
Norcross, Georgia 30092
KERwT. STEVENS
DIRECTOR
Subject: Project Name: Hanes Mali Blvd.
DWQ #: 991172
County: Forysth
COE Permit 200020130
The Wetlands Restoration Program has received a check in the amount of
$126,375.00 check number 1008 as payment for the compensatory mitigation
requirements of the 401 Water Quality Certification issued for the subject project.
This receipt serves as notification that the compensatory mitigation requirements for
this project have been satisfied. Please note that you must also comply with all
other conditions of this certification and any other state, federal or local government
permits or authorization associated with this activity.
The NCWRP, by acceptance of this payment, acknowledges that the
NCWRP is responsible for the compensatory mitigation requirements associated
with DWQ #991172 and agrees to provide the compensatory mitigation as specified
in the 401 Water Quality Certification. As specified, the NCWRP will restore 0.64
acres of wetlands and 867 linear feet of stream in Cataloging Unit 03040101 of the
- Yadkin River basin.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Ron Ferrell at
[phone].
Sincerely,
Ronald E. Ferrell,
Program Manager
REF/cvb
cc: Rob Ridings ?" -
Charles Roadley
File w
WETLANDS RESTORATION PROGRAM
1619 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NC 27699-1619
website: h2o.encstate.nc.us PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST-CONSUMER PAPER
4
A?
NCDENR
JAMES B. HUNT JR.
GOVERNOR
BILL HOLMAN
SECRETARY
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
Mr. Donald Garner
Isakson-Barnhart
25 Technology Parkway South
Suite 201
Norcross, Georgia 30092
Subject: Project. Name:
DWQ #:
County:
COE Permit #:
RECEIPT
November 6, 2000
Hanes Mall Blvd.
991172
Forysth
200020130
? E
j' ? ? 3 ZOC?O
The Wetlands Restoration Program has received a check in the amount of
$126,375.00 check number 1008 as payment for the compensatory mitigation
requirements of the 401 Water Quality Certification issued for the subject project.
This receipt serves as notification that the compensatory mitigation requirements for
this project have been satisfied. Please note that you must also comply with all
other conditions of this certification and any other state, federal or local government
permits or authorization associated with this activity.
The NCWRP, by acceptance of this payment, acknowledges that the
NCWRP is responsible for the compensatory mitigation requirements associated
with DWQ #991172 and agrees to provide the compensatory mitigation as specified
in the 401 Water Quality Certification. As specified, the NCWRP will restore 0.64
acres of wetlands and 867 linear feet of stream in Cataloging Unit 03040101 of the
Yadkin River basin.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Ron Ferrell at
[phone].
Sincerely,
Ronald E. Ferrell,
Program Manager
REF/cvb
cc: Rob Ridings ?" .
Charles RoadleyY
File
WETLANDS RESTORATION PROGRAM
1619 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NC 27699-1 6 1 9
website: h2o.enr.state.nc.us PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY / AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - SO% RECYCLED/10% POST-CONSUMER PAPER
State of North Carolina
/ .Department of Environment
and Natural Resources 4 • •
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor D E N R
Bill Holman, Secretary Kerr T. Stevens, Director
Division of Water Quality
Environmental Sciences Branch & Wetlands/401 Unit
Location: 4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Mailing Address: 1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699
FAX: [phone]
FROM: 'TA94 4
PHONE: v1 -733 - g917
NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS SHEET:79'.n ntc,

If you receive this fax by mistake call: ESB [phone] or Wetlands [phone].
DWQ NCWRP
',? Sep
NCEXNR
.1AM65 B. HUNTJR. ? _R
.6oV6-RNOR '
919 733 5321 1/02 100 16:50 N0.232 01/01
W;SP f NORTH CAROLINA DIMPARTMENT Op.
EN tRONiMENT AND NATvRAL RESouRCEg
DlYISTOW OF WATZR QUA .[+,r
FAX COV'ER SHEET
TO: JV I?iCLtJSt'1Q (C
wArrla MeoRvr*r
Fax number
i. r'ihr 'w• : C?.'?' FROM.
KBRRZST[VLKS i4
CIRaGCOR `' .??.? r
Phone number
>~ SVB TECr: C
::. LATE: 11-oz-4
? s
Total of pages including <
Message: 2-11au-
?at.; Urv (A
:ry
._ .yam
.. "y .11 }
• ? ?Pi
DWQ/Wctlands Restoration Prcgrc
,j 1619 Mail Service Center
4 Raleigh, NC 27699-1619
Phone Number: [phone]
` Fax Number: [phone]
•" " AN 6CVAL 00?oq?'tlN1'ri / APOIRMATIVe A.
b
r 1 l? - I
33 -5ao8
sheet
cop G #7
&MaI.oYLA • 30% RBCTCLEW/Oy rerr.eap9UMAR rrP6R
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
A17A
MIN
NCDEk""'NR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
September 25, 2000
Isakson-Barnhart
c/o Donald Garner
25 Technology Parkway South, Suite 201
Norcross, GA, 30092
Dear Mr. Garner:
Re: Hanes Commons Shopping Center, Forsyth County
DWQ No. 99-1172; DOA Action ID. NO. 200020130
Attached hereto is a copy of Certification No. 3303 issued to Mr. Donald Garner,
Isakson-Barnhart, dated September 25, 2000.
If we can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
Attachment
991172
t
T. Stevens
cc: John Thomas, Corps of Engineers, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
Jennifer Frye, DWQ Winston-Salem Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Charles Roadley, 3000 Easter Circle, Williamsburg, VA, 23188
Division of Water Quality • Non-Discharge Branch
401 Wetlands Unit, 1621 Mail Service Center., Raleigh, NC 27699-1621 Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
..t
NORTH CAROLINA 401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
THIS CERTIFICATION is issued in conformity with the requirements of Section
401 Public Laws 92-500 and 95-217 of the United States and subject to the North
Carolina Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Regulations in 15 NCAC 2H, Section .0500
to the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of
Water Resources, resulting in permanent impacts to 0.32 acre of wetlands and 867 linear
feet of streams in order to construct the Hanes Commons Shopping Center in Forsyth
County, pursuant to an application filed on the 3rd day of March of 2000. Additional
required information was provided by the applicant in subsequent correspondence dated
or received April 27, July 13, August 3, August 16, September 1, September 15 and
September 20, 2000.
The application provides adequate assurance that the discharge of fill material into
unnamed tributaries of Little Creek in conjunction with the proposed work will not result
in a violation of applicable Water Quality Standards and discharge guidelines. Therefore,
the State of North Carolina certifies that this activity will not violate the applicable
portions of Sections 301, 302, 303, 306, 307 of PL 92-500 and PL 95-217 if conducted in
accordance with the application and conditions hereinafter set forth.
This approval is only valid for the purpose and design that you submitted in your
application and follow-up correspondence and as described in the Public Notice. If you
change your project, you must notify us and send us a new application for a new
certification. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of the
Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all
conditions. Should additional wetland or stream fill be requested in the future,
compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A NCAC 2H.0506 (h) (6)
and (7). For this approval to be valid, you must follow the conditions listed below. In
addition, you should get any other federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with
your project including (but not limited to) Solid Waste, Sediment and Erosion control,
Non-discharge and Water Supply Watershed regulations.
Condition(s) of Certification:
1. The activity will be conducted in such manner as to prevent significant increase
in turbidity outside the area of construction or construction related discharge (50
NTU's in streams and rivers not designated as trout waters by DWQ; 25 NTU's
in all saltwater classes, and all lakes and reservoirs; 10 NTU's in trout waters);
2. Should waste or borrow sites be located in wetlands, compensatory mitigation
will be required since it is a direct impact from construction activities;
3. All temporary fill shall be removed to the original grade after construction is
complete and the site shall be stabilized to prevent erosion;
4. Measures shall be taken to prevent live or fresh concrete from coming into
contact with waters of the State until the concrete has hardened;
V
• r?A
5. All sediment and erosion control measures placed in wetlands or waters shall be
removed and the natural grade restored after the Division of Land Resources
releases the project;
6. The stormwater plan dated July 20, 2000 is acceptable except that a pump
capable of completely drawing down the pond must be maintained onsite. Also,
the stormwater plan must be constructed and implemented before any of the
planned buildings are occupied;
7. We understand that you have chosen to contribute to the Wetland Restoration Program
in order to compensate for the impacts to streams and wetlands. In accordance with
15A NCAC 2R.0402 and 15A NCAC 213 .0242(7), this contribution will satisfy our
compensatory mitigation requirements under 15A NCAC 2H.0506(h) and 15A NCAC
2B .0233(10). Until the Wetland Restoration Program receives and clears your check
(made payable to: DENR - Wetlands Restoration Program), wetland and stream
impacts (including fill) shall not occur. Mr. Ron Ferrell should be contacted at
[phone] if you have any questions concerning the Wetland Restoration Program.
You have one month from the date of this Certification to make this payment. For
accounting purposes, this Certification authorizes the fill of 867 feet of streams and
0.32 acre of wetlands, in the Yadkin-Pee Dee River and sub-basin and 867 feet of
stream mitigation and 0.64 acre of wetland mitigation are required. Please be
aware that the Wetland Restoration Program (WRP) rules require rounding of
stream impacts to the nearest foot and acreage amounts to one-quarter acre
increments (15A NCAC 2R.0503(b))."
Violations of any condition herein set forth shall result in revocation of this
Certification and may result in criminal and/or civil penalties. This Certification shall
become null and void unless the above conditions are made conditions of the Federal 404
Permit. This Certification shall expire upon expiration of the 404 Permit.
If this Certification is unacceptable to you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing
upon written request within sixty (60) days following receipt of this Certification. This
request must be in the form of a written petition conforming to Chapter 150B of the
North Carolina General Statutes and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings,
P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. If modifications are made to an original
Certification, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing on the modifications upon
written request within sixty (60) days following receipt of the Certification. Unless such
demands are made, this Certification shall be final and binding.
This the 25th day of September 2000
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
7
Steve'
WQC # 3303
5. All sediment and erosion control measures placed in wetlands or waters shall be
removed and the natural grade restored after the Division of Land Resources
releases the project; y
6. The stormwater plan dated July 20, 2000 is acceptable except that a pump
capable of completely drawing down the pond must be maintained onsite. Also,
the stormwater plan must be constructed and implemented before any of the
planned buildings are occupied;
7. We understand that you have chosen to contribute to the Wetland Restoration Program
in order to compensate for the impacts to streams and wetlands. In accordance with
15A NCAC 2R.0402 and 15A NCAC 213 .0242(7), this contribution will satisfy our
compensatory mitigation requirements under 15A NCAC 2H.0506(h) and 15A NCAC
2B .0233(10). Until the Wetland Restoration Program receives and clears your check
(made payable to: DENR - Wetlands Restoration Program), wetland and stream
impacts (including fill) shall not occur. Mr. Ron Ferrell should be contacted at
[phone] if you have any questions concerning the Wetland Restoration Program.
You have one month from the date of this Certification to make this payment. For
accounting purposes, this Certification authorizes the fill of 867 feet of streams and
0.32 acre of wetlands, in the Yadkin-Pee Dee River and sub-basin and 867 feet of
stream mitigation and 0.64 acre of wetland mitigation are required. Please be
aware that the Wetland Restoration Program (WRP) rules require rounding of
stream impacts to the nearest foot and acreage amounts to one-quarter acre
increments (15A N CAC 2R .0503(b)). "
Violations of any condition herein set forth shall result in revocation of this
Certification and may result in criminal and/or civil penalties. This Certification shall
become null and void unless the above conditions are made conditions of the Federal 404
Permit. This Certification shall expire upon expiration of the 404 Permit.
If this Certification is unacceptable to you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing
upon written request within sixty (60) days following receipt of this Certification. This
request must be in the form of a written petition conforming to Chapter 150B of the
North Carolina General Statutes and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings.
P.O. Box 27447, Raleigh, N.C. 27611-7447. If modifications are made to an original
Certification, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing on the modifications upon
written request within sixty (60) days following receipt of the Certification. Unless such
demands are made, this Certification shall be final and binding.
This the 25th day of September 2000
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
ti
Stevens
WQC # 3303

NORTH CAROLINA-DIVISON OF WATER QUALITY
401 WATER QUALITY CERTIFICATION
SUMMARY OF PERMITTED IMPACTS AND MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS
In accordance with 15A NCAC 2 H .0500, Mr. Donald Garner has permission as outline below for the purpose(s)
of proposed Hanes Commons Shopping Center. All activities associated with these authorized impacts must be conducted
with the conditions listed in the attached certification transmittal letter. THIS CERTIFICATION IS NOT VALID
WITHOUT THE ATTACHMENTS.
COMPENSATORY MITIGATION REQUIREMENT WETLAND RESTORATION PROGRAM
LOCATION
COUNTY: Forsyth County
BASIN/SUBBASIN Yadkin Pee Dee
As required by 15A NCAC 2H .0506, and the conditions of this certification, you are required to compensate for
the above impacts through the restoration, creation, enhancement or preservation of wetlands and surface waters as
outlined below prior to conducting any activities that impact or degrade the waters of the state.
Note: Acreage requirements proposed to be mitigated through the wetland Restoration Programs must be rounded to one-
quarter acre increments according to 15 2r.0503(b)
0.64 acres of Class WL wetlands
acres of riparian wetland
acres of non-riparian wetlands
acres of Class SWL wetlands
867 feet of stream mitigation
(other)
One of the options you have available to satisfy the compensatory mitigation requirements is through the payment
of a fee to the Wetlands Restoration Fund per NCAC 2R .0503. If you choose this option, please sign this form and mail
it to the Wetlands Restoration Fund at the address listed below. An invoice for the appropriate amount of payment will be
sent to you upon receipt of this form. PLEASE NOTE, THE ABOVE IMPACTS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED UNTIL
YOU RECEIVED NOTIFICATION THAT YOUR PAYMENT HAS BEEN PROCESSED BY THE WETLANDS
RESTORATION PROGRAM.
Signature
Date
WETLANDS RESTORATION PROGRAM
DIVISON OF WATER QUALITY
1619 Mail Service Center
RALEIGH, N.C. 27669-1619
[phone]
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
099MA,
'&74?j 0
D E N R
Division of Water Quality
Environmental Sciences Branch & Wetlands/401 Unit
Location: 4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, N.C. 27607
Mailing Address: 1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699
FAX: [phone] <p// 710D
FAX TO: FAX NUMBER- 76-7) 2
q-?fs?7
FROM: jro-& Dl gA,ey , kJF41a C>S UA111
PHONE: ( j/g) 733 - Y& i/&
NO. OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS SHEET:
J i a, 1 /xw •- 1A1V©/
If you receive this fax by mistake call: ESB [phone] or Wetlands [phone].
r ?,
. ? ?..
? ?.? ?? r ?
`? v l ?A
}.
,t 11?
.?. f ?.
,,,? ,?+?
a ?: ?, iii? ! t
? ?,
??-
UM/ZU/ZUUU WED 11:SZ t''AA '101 ZZV 4aUt WX t5U ZAVIXuatl;PIA? %?xuur
Williamsburg Environmen al Group, Inc.
3000 Easter Circle
Williamsburg, Virginia 3188_
[phone]
Fax (757) 229A50 7
FACSEMME
File DWQ - 991172
Date September 20, 2000
To Cyndi Karoly
From Chuck Roadley
Phone Number of Receiving
Fax Machine [phone]
Number of Pages Following 1
If you do not receive all pages of this transmittal, pie
6869 as soon as possible,
Cyndh
Attached is the official response from the WRP regarding
you require additional information.
Thinku
\\SOtVLRl VobSles\0900's\941 Wiwtw Salem\ecologyTax to Cyndi.doc
AL
contact Amanda at (757) 220-
ie above-referenced project. Please call if
%w VV1/ %P V'6
ern
HCDENR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
September 15, 2000
Memorandum To: File
From: Todd St. John
Subject: Isakson-Barnhart
Forsyth County
DWQ#991172
If this project is issued, the stormwater plan dated 7/20/00 is acceptable except the
401 WQC should stipulate-that a pump must be maintained on site that can completely
draw down the pond. The 401 WQC should also stipulate the language that the
stormwater plan should be constructed and implemented before the first building is
occupied.
U8/ZaU/ZUUU WEE) 11:JZ kA3 757 ZZU 40UY WAbJJ'U rAV11(UZJML11A} tIRUUr
,
Williamsburg Environmen al Group, Inc.
3000 Easter Urcl
Williamsburg, Virginia 3188_
[phone]
Fax [phone]
FACSD11LE
AL
File DWQ - 991172
Date September 20, 2000
To Cyndi Karoly
From Chuck Roadley
Phone Number of Receiving
Fax Machine [phone]
Number of Pages Following 1
If you do not receive all pages of this transmittal, ple
6869 as soon as possible,
Cyndh
Attached is the official response from the WRP regarding t
you require additional information.
contact Amanda at (757) 220-
WJ VV1/ V-
ie above-referenced project. Please call if
Thanks Again,
ASUVERIVobfiles109001041 Winston SelanecologyTax to Cyndi.doc

a
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
NMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCi I;
DIVISION OI~ WAVER QUALITY

1,w ' 1

11 DILL HOLMAN
Ei:iar&ARY
1
n?a
7 ?t r ''? 4F 4?? ??'+
??? yiyy NM?.Ce 1", ..•??
bb ,^ r 'P
I-4¦ n???,•Y FIN'' .?•g?,'y??
F , 4
A ? S r. M •? 1,.i.?.y,. t.?lY el ?1?? ? 4
`r?a r
f *. ; 4
wi w„X4A
010T' IA
p ? N'14

Mr. Charles Roadley, Jr.
Williamsburg Environmental Group
3000 Easter Circle
Williamsburg, Virginia 23188
Dear Mr. Roadley:
ENVE
Subject: Projec
DWQ
The purpose of this letter is to notify
Restoration Program (NCWRP) will accept I
associated with the subject project in accords
Understanding between the North Carolina T
Resources and the U.S..Army Corps of Engii
on information supplied by you in a letter da
requesting authorization to impact 0.32 acres
stream channel has been submitted for the su
mitigation as specified in the 401 Water Qua
permit (up to 0.64 acres of wetlands and 867
impacts associated with the subject project it
Yadkin River basin.
If you have any questions or need
Crystal Braswell at [phone],
REF/cvb
cc: John Dorney, Wetlands/401 Unit
Ken Jolly, USACOE
Steve Mitchell, DWQ-RRO
file
webslte:
AN EQUAL OPPORYUNITr ! AFFIRMATIVE AG•
September 1, 2000
• s
Hanes Mall Blvd.
991172
Forsyth
lou that the North Carolina Wetlands
ayment for wetland and stream impacts
ace with the Memorandum of
epartment of Environment and Natural
eers dated November 4, 1998. Based
rd August 15, 2000, an application
of wetlands and 867 linear feet of
;ject project. The NCWRP will provide
ity Certification and/or Section 404
linear feet of stream restoration) for
Cataloging Unit 03040101 of the
information, please contact
Sincerely,
Ronald E. Ferrell,
Program Manager
1:1 A- r.
WETLANDS RESTORATION PROGRAM
1610 MAIL SERVICE CENTER, RALEIGH, NC 27699-1019
11r.stsle_ne-m FHONC 910-733.3208 FAX 91 B-793-5321
EMPLOYER - 50% REGTGLEP/10% PONT•GONBVMER PAPER
ern
NCDENR
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
September 15, 2000
Memorandum To: File
From: Todd St. John
Subject: Isakson-Barnhart
Forsyth County
DWQ#991172
If this project is issued, the stormwater plan dated 7/20/00 is acceptable except the
401 WQC should stipulate-that a pump must be maintained on site that can completely
draw down the pond. The 401 WQC should also stipulate the language that the
stormwater plan should be constructed and implemented before the first building is
occupied.
Regional Contact: Jennifer Frye
ranch . 'NO Supervisor: J..??rry Coble
Date:
STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
on-Barnhard County Forsyth
1172 County2
Frorri APP Region Winston-Salem:
Received Date 10:20/99 Recvd By Region 10/26/99
Project Type Commercial
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req. MIS
?? O Y O N r 12-94-11 F c 30,?04. 0.32 1,328.69 867.00 461.69
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres
WRP ?- I -
Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? Q Y O N
Did you request more info? QQ Y O N
Feet
867.00
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? Q Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? QQ Y O N Recommendation: Q Issue * Issue/Coed O Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 36° 3' 50"
Longitude (ddmmss) 80° 19' 00"
Comments:
ON Ho l n I ETTER SENT BY REGION ON 11/4/99 for the following reasons-
1 . Propose imimpacts greater than 590 LF, need to re-apply for IP_
Did not include all im acp is to j?,lrisdictional waters. (only the mitiaatable waters)
3 Used square footage instead of linear footage for intermittent channel.
d Did not include a delineated wetland with total acreage to be impacted.
5 Did not sufficiently provide documentation that they investigated the possibility of off-site
mitigation _-
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Isakson-Barnhard
99 1172
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 2
2. They have stated that they have accounted for all wetlands to be impacted. However, it iS still the
position of this Office that a small area (<1 acre) of wetlands exists at the Lowe's propel/ ounda in
Area II

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Wilmington District, Corps of Engineers
Post Office Box 1890
Wilmington, North Carolina 28402-1890
Action ID No. 200020130

t
MAR ! 32000

'11rT_P ? ?s;?sJ

February 24, 2000
PUBLIC NOTICE
MR. DONALD W. GARNER / ISAKSON-BARNHART, 25 TECHNOLOGY
PARKWAY SOUTH, SUITE 201, NORCROSS, GEORGIA, 30092, has requested a
Department of the Army (DA) permit TO AUTHORIZE THE PROPOSED RELOCATION OF
UNNAMED TRIBUTARIES OF LITTLE CREEK AND THE DISCHARGE OF FILL INTO
ADJACENT WOODED WETLANDS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROPOSED
CONSTRUCTION OF COMMERCIAL RETAIL DEVELOPMENT, LOCATED OFF OF
HANES MALL BOULEVARD, IN WINSTON-SALEM, FORSYTH COUNTY, NORTH
CAROLINA.
The following description of the work is taken from data provided by the applicant and
from observations made during a site visit by a representative of the Corps of Engineers. Plans
submitted with the application depict permanent impacts to 0.32 acre of wetlands and 0.23 acre
(A'67 linear filet) of streams (total of 0.55 acres of impacts to jurisdictional waters of the United
States). The applicant for the 35-acre project is proposing a commercial retail center involving
the construction of approximately 300,000 square feet of commercial retail space, associated
access roads, and a required stormwater management facility. The site is divided into two small
drainages. The western drainage consists of an intermittent stream/forested headwater wetland
with an onsite drainage area of 14 acres and an offsite drainage area of 8 acres. This tributary
flows into a 42-inch culvert under Hanes Mall Boulevard. The eastern drainage is somewhat
larger with an onsite drainage area of approximately 25 acres and an offsite area of
approximately 10 acres. Drainage within this section enters the property from two existing
culverts and exits the project through a 54-inch culvert under Hanes Mall Boulevard. The
existing streams have been degraded by past upstream and adjacent urban activities as evidenced
by unstable eroded banks, silted.stream..bottoms,.and the.presence of substantial vegetative
debris.
The proposed project will permanently impact, by culvert and fill, 0.55 acre
(approximately 0.32 acre of jurisdictional wooded wetlands and 0.23 acre/867 linear feet of
jurisdictional stream channels) of waters of the United States associated with unnamed tributaries
of Little Creek. The purpose of the work is to provide for the construction of a commercial retail
development within a section of Hanes Mall Boulevard that has and continues to experience
ongoing commercial development. The project's location makes this site desirable for
commercial users who want to utilize the adjacent, existing roadway infrastructure and existing
commercial enterprises. Plans showing the work are included with this public notice.

2
The State of North Carolina will review this public notice to determine the need for the
applicant to obtain any required State authorization. No Department of the Army (DA) permit
will be issued until the coordinated State viewpoint on the proposal has been received and
reviewed by this agency, nor will a DA permit be issued until the North Carolina Division of
Environmental Management (NCDEM) has determined the applicability of a Water Quality
Certificate as required by PL 92-500.
This application is being considered pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33
U.S.C. 1344). Any person may request, in writing within the comment period specified in the
notice, that a public hearing be held to consider this application. Requests for public hearing
shall state, with particularity, the reasons for holding a public hearing.
The District Engineer has consulted the latest published version of the National Register
of Historic Places for the presence or absence of registered properties, or properties listed as
being eligible for inclusion therein, and this site is not registered property or property listed as
being eligible for inclusion in the Register. Consultation of the National Register constitutes the
extent of cultural resource investigations by the District Engineer, and he is otherwise unaware of
the presence of such resources. Presently, unknown archeological, scientific, prehistorical, or
historical data may be lost or destroyed by work under the requested permit.
The District Engineer has determined, based on a review of data furnished by the applicant
and onsite observation, that the activity will not affect species, or their critical habitat, designated
as endangered or threatened pursuant to the Endangered Species Act of 1973.
The decision whether to issue a permit will be based on an evaluation of the probable
impacts, including cumulative impacts, of the proposed activity and its intended use on the
public interest. Evaluation of the probable impacts which the proposed activity may have on the
public interest requires a careful weighing of all those factors which become relevant in each
particular case. The benefits which reasonably may be expected to accrue from the proposal
must be balanced against its reasonably foreseeable detriments. The decision whether to
authorize a proposal, and if so the conditions under which it will be allowed to occur, are
therefore determined by the outcome of the general balancing process. That decision should
reflect the national concern for both protection and utilization of important resources. All factors
which may be relevant to the proposal must be considered including the cumulative effects
thereof. Among those are conservation, economics, aesthetics, general environmental concerns,
wetlands, cultural values, fish and wildlife values, flood hazards and flood plain values (in
accordance with Executive Order 11988), land use, navigation, shore erosion and accretion,
recreation, water supply and conservation, water quality, energy needs, safety, food and fiber
production, mineral needs, considerations of property ownership, and, in general, the needs and
welfare of the people. For activities involving the placement of dredged or fill materials in
waters of the United States, a permit will be denied if the discharge that would be authorized by
such permit would not comply with the Environmental Protection Agencies' 404(b)(1)
guidelines. Subject to the preceding sentence and any other applicable guidelines or criteria, a
permit will be granted unless the District Engineer determines that it would be contrary to the
public interest.
i
3
The Corps of Engineers is soliciting comments from the public; Federal, State and local
agencies and officials; Indian Tribes and other interested parties in order to consider and evaluate
the impacts of this proposed activity. Any comments received will be considered by the Corps of
Engineers to determine whether to issue, modify, condition or deny a permit for this proposal.
To make this decision, comments are used to assess impacts on endangered species, historic
properties, water quality, general environmental effects and the other public interest factors listed
above. Comments are used in the preparation of an Environmental Assessment (EA) and/or an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA). Comments are also used to determine the need for a public hearing and to determine
the overall public interest of the proposed activity.
Generally, the decision whether to issue this Department of the Army (DA) permit will not
be made until the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management (NCDEM) issues,
denies, or waives State certification required by Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. The
NCDEM considers whether or not the proposed activity will comply with Sections 301, 302,
306, and 307 of the Clean Water Act. The application and this public notice for the Department
of the Army (DA) permit serves as application to the NCDEM for certification.
Additional information regarding the Clean Water Act certification may be reviewed at the
offices of the Environmental Operations Section, North Carolina Division of Water Quality
(NCDWQ), Salisbury Street, Archdale Building, Raleigh, North Carolina. Copies of such
materials will be furnished to any person requesting copies upon payment of reproduction costs.
All persons desiring to make comments regarding the application for Clean Water Act
certification should do so in writing delivered to the North Carolina Division of Water Quality
(NCDWQ), Wetlands/401 Unit, 1621 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621,
on or before March 17, 2000, Attention: Mr. John Dorney.
Written comments pertinent to the proposed work, as outlined above, will be received in
this office, Attention: Mr. John Thomas, until 4:15 p.m., March 24, 2000, or telephone (919)
876-8441, Extension 25.

SOURCE: NORT14 CAROLINA ATLAS AND GAZEMER,
PoLORlE MAPPWx CO„ 1995.
FIGURE 1 of 3
PROJECT VICINITY MAP
WINSTON-SALEM SITE
WMSTON-SALEM, N.C. I OCTOBER 1999
ILLIAMSBURG
4XWMNMENTAL
9ROUP, INC.
2.4 MILES 12 0 MILES 2.4 MILES
SCALE: I INC44 = 2.4 MILES

2000, 1000' 0' UW'
SCALE: 1 INCH . 2000 FEET
LATITUDE: 36'3'50°
L OWsRUDE: 8099'00°
SOURCE: USGS 15 MINUTE SERJES TOPOGRAM41C MAP,
WNSTON-SALEM WEST. N.C a ADRANGLE, 1950
REVISED 1994
ROUP, INC.
FIGURE 2 of 3
PROJECT LOCATION MAP
1PINSTON-SALEM SITE
WINSTON-SALEM, N.C. i OCTOBER 1999

C;? -
o cy
LIZLL
RIX?0w
"~,??-rte ? ?r??--Wa .oo) cau as •asta ? smtts ? -.. ??•?- -
a?
np
i
a' .9
v
Nit r 3 2B '
1ytrra t [t y
I?L1O Flip-)}?'Jt g aD Ali
D R r
? 3 a 3
(l 2a, 9
gig
F1GuXj' 3of3
DATE: OCTOBER 0. 1999 J
JOB D: JANUARY 25, EooO ypETl, p IMPACT'S MAp-S L p ALTERNATIVE • ?u ErrvmDNxerrrAr ceour. [NC.
RE NOI JAN 942
SCALE: 2• - 200• WWSTON-SALEM SITE n Environmental Consultants
SOURCE: ISAKSON-BARNEART DEVELOPMENT WWSTON-SALEM. NORTH cAROUNA .y
ILLIAMSBURG
IRONMENTAL
ROUP, INC.
August 16, 2000
Mr. John Thomas
US Army Corps of Engineers
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Re: Winston-Salem Site, USACOE # 200020130, NCDWQ # 99-1172
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Environmental Consultants
This correspondence will follow up our discussions regarding the above-referenced application
submitted to you for the development of a 35-acre parcel located in Winston-Salem, North
Carolina. Based upon your request, we initiated an offsite review of available compensatory
mitigation areas within the Winston-Salem area.
As I have conveyed to you previously, our client does not own additional land in the Winston-
Salem area. As such, our efforts focused on finding available land with property owners willing
to either sell their property or at least commit to having the compensation area and associated
upland buffer protected under a suitable deed restriction. Our analysis of available land suitable
for restoration included the assistance of the Meridian Realty Group located in Winston-Salem,
NC, the City of Winston-Salem, and the North Carolina Housing Foundation., We examined 10
sites in the Winston-Salem area for potential restoration and one near Kemersville.
The following represents a summary of our analysis documenting the sites that were examined
for potential stream restoration. We have also included several photographs that document the
site conditions we encountered. Potential sites were evaluated based on the following criteria.
• Existing Wetlands • Land Use
• Existing Vegetation • Access
• Utilities • Topography
• Soils • Future Development Potential
• Floodplain Elevation • Available Spoil Area
• Drainage Area • Mitigation Requirement
1. The first site was located along Mill Creek just south of Stanleyville. The site is
associated with a 9-acre remnant of the larger Vulcan Tract. This larger area serves a
variety of landuse including industrial and residential development. The majority of the 9-
acre property lies within the floodplain and approximately 60 percent of the site can be
categorized as jurisdictional wetlands. A utility line runs parallel to Mill Creek
throughout the property. At this location, Mill Creek as a drainage area of approximately
5000 acres (8 square miles). The 20-foot wide creek is bounded to the south by 30-foot
slopes heavily vegetated with mature tree canopy. The northern bank is 6-8 feet high and
is also vegetated with a mature tree canopy. Topography within the project area is
relatively uniform and the creek makes a gentle meander as it enters the property.
3000 Easter Circle • Williamsburg, Virginia 23188 • [phone] • FAX [phone]
Mr. John Thomas
August 16, 2000
Page 2
While it is evident that large portions of Mill Creek have been historically impacted
through channelization and activities on adjoining uplands, the site fails to meet basic
criteria for restoration. The side slopes are relatively stable and heavily vegetated with
mature trees. Access to the site is limited. along the southern shore and the presence of
jurisdictional resources and the buried utility further limits the available upland. The
drainage area for the proposed Winston-Salem development located in the headwaters of
Little Creek is approximately 118 acres (0.18 square miles). At 8 square miles, the Mill
Creek watershed is significantly larger. As such and in consideration of the site as a
whole, the Mill Creek site was determined to be unsuitable and eliminated from further
consideration.
2. The second site is associated with an unnamed tributary to the South Fork of Muddy
Creek. The site has a drainage area of approximately 50 acres. The site is also heavily
vegetated with mature tree species and we have recently learned that the landowner has
expressed a reluctance to place deed restrictions on the property. For this reason, this
property was eliminated from further consideration.
3. , A third site involved portions of land controlled by the North Carolina Housing
Foundation along a headwater reach of a stream segment associated with the West Fork
Deep River in Kernersville. The site has a small drainage of less than 50 acres with no
peak attenuation or treatment of stormwater discharged from surrounding development.
While the stream continues to be heavily impacted by peak flows, site restoration, is
constrained by existing utilities, the presence of mature hardwood trees and the prevailing
steep topography. A potential candidate for restoration, the primary focus of a
remediation effort in this setting should be stormwater management. When you combine
this understanding with an evaluation of the site constraints, the limited drainage area, and
compare it to our goal for compensatory mitigation, this site falls short of the quantity of
mitigation required. For this reason, this site was eliminated from further consideration.
4. The next site we inspected is located on property owned by the School of the Arts in
Winston-Salem. The site drains approximately 60 acres adjacent to the school and flows
into Salem Creek below Central Park. The existing stream channel is bounded by very
steep slopes covered in Kudzu which give way to existing development on either side of
the riparian corridor including right-of-way for existing roadways and home sites.
Destabilizing these slopes with channel modifications is not recommended. Such a
proposal would involve significant grading and encroachment into surrounding lands
including the adjacent home sites. Enhancement through riparian plantings and the
control of Kudzu may be an option but the overall project area is not sufficient to meet the
compensation requirements. In addition, the site has a small drainage area that brings into
question the status of the stream as a perennial feature.
5-8. The City of Winston-Salem has recently begun an evaluation of stream channels within
City property with the goal of restoring eroded and problem areas in the Muddy Creek
watershed. The City has been awarded a $ 985,800.00 grant through the Clean Water
Management Trust Fund for these purposes. The focal point of their evaluation is the
Salem Creek drainage. The City chose Salem Creek because it is on North Carolina's
Mr. John Thomas
August 16, 2000
Page 3
April 3, 2000 § 303(d) list of waters nonsupporting in its uses. " The Salem Creek
watershed is mostly urban and drainsall of downtown Winston-Salem. The total drainage
area of Salem Creek within the study area is approximately 13,700 acres (21 square
miles).
Through the City's scoping efforts, they have identified three reaches of Salem Creek in
need of restoration. We inspected these sites with the City on June 27, 2000 and looked for
areas where we could expand on the City's existing effort by restoring additional areas
within the main stem of the waterway. The first site (Site 5) is located in Central. Park just
south of downtown off Main Street. The length of restoration proposed is approximately
1050 linear feet. This section of stream is severely eroded and is threatening utility
infrastructure. The second segment (Site 6) is located at the Martin Luther King Jr. Drive
Bridge in Civitan Park. The length of restoration in this area is approximately 2500 linear
feet. This site is also experiencing severe erosion in stream meanders. The third site (Site
7) is located on Brushy Fork Creek in Bowen Park situated just off of New Walkertown
Road east of downtown Winston-Salem. This 2200-foot section has 10-foot vertical banks
and is about to claim an electrical transmission tower. We also examined a portion of
Brushy Fork Creek downstream of the City project (Site 8) but the linear distance was not
sufficient to meet the compensation requirement.
9. We also inspected tributary streams in close proximity to the proposed restoration. The
tributary systems we examined tend to be unstable channelized conveyances designed to
expedite water movement into the adjacent receiving body. The existing conditions vary
between sections but include scour and excessive sediment deposition along with a little to
no riparian buffer. We believe these areas represented a good opportunity to provide
stream restoration in keeping with the impacts proposed for the Hanes Mall Boulevard
development. A portion of stream locally mapped as Stadium Branch in the Civitan Park
area has an 1100-foot section just upstream of the confluence with Salem Creek that we
felt would meet your restoration requirements. The drainage area for this section is
approximately 220 acres (0.34 square miles). The majority of this stream is nothing more
that a "Y' channel cut into the surrounding upland. The channel slopes are vegetated with
grass but this straight linear feature is functioning more as a flume directing the erosive
force of stormwater directly into the streambanks of Salem Creek.
10-11.Two additional tributaries located within the Central Park/Happy Hill Park project area
were also examined for restoration opportunities however the linear distance of these
combined systems is only 650 feet. In addition, Ms. Jennifer Frye (NCDENR) indicated
that we could not propose restoration in an intermittent waterway. Both of these areas
were considered intermittent based on our inspection and as such unsuitable.
The only viable site identified during this review was located along Stadium Branch (Site 9) on
property owned by the City of Winston-Salem. Stadium Branch is a tributary to a portion of
Salem Creek that is scheduled to undergo enhancement/restoration under the grant from the
Clean Water Management Trust Fund. Unfortunately, following conceptual plan preparation and
tentative approval by you during our July 26, 2000 site inspection, the City declined use of the
site due to the potential to impact recreation areas in the park.
Mr. John Thomas
August 16, 2000
Page 4
Over .the course of the last three months, we have made every effort to identify a suitable
compensation area. And while we were successful in identifying an area that met with your
tentative approval, the property owner ultimately denied the proposed action. We have now
reached a stage in the evaluation process where we have no viable alternative but to request
authorization for compensatory mitigation through a contribution to the North Carolina Wetland
Restoration Program (WRP).
On behalf of our client, the Williamsburg Environmental Group, Inc. (WEG) respectfully
requests that the Corps and the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources issue their respective permits contingent upon our proposed mitigation. I have
forwarded a letter to Mr. Ron Ferrell soliciting the WRP's acceptance of our request. If you
have any questions, please feel free to call me at your convenience.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter..
Sincerely,
Charles R. Roadley, Jr.
Senior Regulatory Specialist/Project Manager
Enclosure
cc: Ms. Jennifer Frye, NCDENR
Ms. Cyndi Bell, NCDENR
Mr. Donald W. Garner, Isakson-Barnhart
Site 1. Mill Creek
Site 4. Salem Creek Trib.
Site 3. West Fork Deep River
Site 5. Salem Creek
Site 3. West Fork Deep River
Site 6. Salem Creek
Site 4. Salem Creek Trib.
Site 7. Brushy Creek

Site 1. Mill Creek
Site 4. Salem Creek Trib.
Site 3. West Fork Deep River
Site 5. Salem Creek
Site 3. West Fork Deep River
Site 6. Salem Creek
Site 4. Salem Creek Trib.
Site 7. Brushy Creek

,s ? - ?. ak i. car
r r x S,?
Site 10. Salem Crcci< Trib.
Site 8. Brushy Creek
Site 11. Salem Creek Trib.
Site 9. Stadium Branch
Site 9. Stadium Branch
Site 10. Salem Creek Trib.

' ILLIAMSBURG
'IRONMENTAL
ROUP, INC.
August 15, 2000
Mr. Ron Ferrell
Environmental Consultants
? Q V
NC Wetlands Restoration Program AUG, 1 6 2000
320 W. Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27603
NDS GROUP
WATER U1':Li3Y SEG e `
RE: USACOE # 200020130, NCDWQ # 99-1172
35-Acre Site, Hanes Mall Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC
Dear Mr. Ferrell:
This correspondence will follow up our conversation in June regarding a project located in
Winston-Salem, North Carolina. Williamsburg Environmental Group, Inc. (WEG) has been
retained to provide environmental services for the above-referenced parcel. This process began
back in October 1999 with the submission of a permit application involving impacts to
jurisdictional resources regulated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and the North
Carolina Department of the Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality
(DWQ). Enclosed is a copy of the original application along with subsequent submittals made
during the course of the agency review.
The construction of this development including the stormwater management facility will require
direct impacts to 0.32 acres of nontidal-forested headwater wetlands, 0.07 acres of other waters
of the U.S. and 867 linear feet of stream channel. The applicant has worked diligently to avoid
and minimize impacts to natural resources to the greatest extent practicable, however in this
instance, impacts to jurisdictional resources are unavoidable. In an effort to compensate for
permanent unavoidable impacts, the applicant proposed to mitigate these impacts through a
contribution to the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (WRP). In my latest
conversation with both the Corps and DWQ, they are requesting 1:1 compensation for 867 linear
feet of stream channel.
Prior to approving a WRP mitigation proposal, both the Corps and DWQ recently requested that
our client investigate additional offsite opportunities for stream restoration. Our client does not
own additional land in the Winston-Salem area and as such, our efforts focused on finding
available land with property owners willing to either sell their property or at least commit to
having the compensation area and associated upland buffer protected under a suitable deed
restriction. We contacted a local real estate broker and the City of Winston-Salem in an effort
locate areas for potential stream restoration. We have examined 10 sites for potential restoration
in the Winston-Salem area and one near Kernersville. The only viable site identified during this
review was located along Stadium Branch, in Civitan Park, on property owned by the City of
Winston-Salem. Stadium Branch is a tributary to a portion of Salem Creek that is scheduled to
undergo enhancement/restoration under a grant from the Clean Water Management Trust Fund.
3000 Easter Circle • Williamsburg, Virginia 23188 • [phone] • FAX [phone]
r_ 14
ILLIAMSBURG
IRONMENTAL
ROUP, INC.
Environmental Consultants
August 15, 2000
Mr. Ron Ferrell
NC Wetlands Restoration Program
320 W. Jones Street
Raleigh, NC 27603
AUG,1 6 2000
RE: USACOE # 200020130, NCDWQ # 99-1172 1
35-Acre Site, Hanes Mall Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC
Dear Mr. Ferrell:
This correspondence will follow up our conversation in June regarding a project located in
Winston-Salem, North Carolina. Williamsburg Environmental Group, Inc. (WEG) has been
retained to provide environmental services for the above-referenced parcel. This process began
back in October 1999 with the submission of a permit application involving impacts to
jurisdictional resources regulated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) and the North
Carolina Department of the Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality
(DWQ). Enclosed is a copy of the original application along with subsequent submittals made
during the course of the agency review.
The construction of this development including the stormwater management facility will require
direct impacts to 0.32 acres of nontidal-forested headwater wetlands, 0.07 acres of other waters
of the U.S. and 867 linear feet of stream channel. The applicant has worked diligently to avoid
and minimize impacts to natural resources to the greatest extent practicable, however in this
instance, impacts to jurisdictional resources are unavoidable. In an effort to compensate for
permanent unavoidable impacts, the applicant proposed to mitigate these impacts through a
contribution to the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration Program (WRP). In my latest
conversation with both the Corps and DWQ, they are requesting 1:1 compensation for 867 linear
feet of stream channel.
Prior to approving a WRP mitigation proposal, both the Corps and DWQ recently requested that
our client investigate additional offsite opportunities for stream restoration. Our client does not
own additional land in the Winston-Salem area and as such, our efforts focused on finding
available land with property owners willing to either sell their property or at least commit to
having the compensation area and associated upland buffer protected under a suitable deed
restriction. We contacted a local real estate broker and the City of Winston-Salem in an effort
locate areas for potential stream restoration. We have examined 10 sites for potential restoration
in the Winston-Salem area and one near Kernersville. The only viable site identified during this
review was located along Stadium Branch, in Civitan Park, on property owned by the City of
Winston-Salem. Stadium Branch is a tributary to a portion of Salem Creek that is scheduled to
undergo enhancement/restoration under a grant from the Clean Water Management Trust Fund.
r
3000 Easter Circle • Williamsburg, Virginia 23188 • [phone] • FAX [phone]

Mr. Ron Ferrell
August 15, 2000
Page 2
Unfortunately, following conceptual plan preparation and tentative approval by the Corps, the
City declined use of the site due to its potential to impact recreation areas in the park.
Our client has made a significant effort to satisfy the requests of the regulatory agencies.
Unfortunately, we have been unable to find a site that meets both the requirements of the
agencies and is acceptable to the landowner(s). Therefore, on behalf of our client, WEG
respectfully requests that you accept our proposal for a donation to the WRP as compensatory
mitigation for the proposed impacts. We have been in the regulatory process now for almost a
year and my client is running short on time. If you require any additional information, please do
not hesitate to contact me.
Thank you for your assistance in this matter.
Sincerely,
Charles R. Roadley, Jr.
Senior Regulatory Specialist/Project Manager
Enclosures
Mr. John Thomas, U.S.A.C.E., w/o enclosures
Ms. Jennifer Frye, NCDENR, w/o enclosures
Ms. Cyndi Bell, NCDENR, w/o enclosures
Mr. Donald W. Garner, Isakson-Barnhart, w/o enclosures
r
:SON/BARNHART DEVELOPMENT
07/21/00 VENDOR NCL.
account #
Invoice #
PERMIT
Inv.Date Co-Pro P.O. #
07/21/00 06-006
TOTAL
(AC-Ak--
143 9
ISAKSON/BARNHART DEVELOPMENT SUNTRUST .BANK
P.: o. BOX 4418
770-417-1788 FAX A.17-1789.
ATLANTA, 'GA 30302
25`TECHNOLOGY PARKWAY,;SUITE 201`
NOR:CROSS,, GA 30092
DATE
0 07/21/00 ., *****
W
R PAY FOUR HUNDRED "TWENTY' ;AND N'0110:0 DOLLARS
C
.H
E
C
K
To THE N.C.D.:N.R.
ORDER 0?u
AUTHOR12
11'00 L4 39"s -0:06 1000 X041: 880 X99044411'
o"'t
FREELAND AND KAUFFII AN, OF TRANSMITTAL
EvIneers a I andsweve A 0 tects' Date July 24, 2000
209 West Stone Aveni e-µµ`•- Attention:
Greenville, South Carolina 29609
[phone] RE: Hanes Commons Shopping Center
FAX [phone] Winston-Salem, NC
TO NCDENR
We are sending to you Attached ?Under separate cover via The following:
?Shop Drawings ? Pnnts ® Plans ? Paper Vellums ? Specifications
? Copy of Letter ? Change Order ? Disk ?Other As listed below
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
2 Construction Plans
2 Stormwater & Sediment Calculations
2 Stormwater Mngmt. Permit Application (1 original)
1 Wet Detention Basin Supplement (original)
1 Narrative of Treatment Procedures
1 Check $420

THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
?For approval ?Approved as submitted ?Resubmit copies for approval
®For your use ?Approved as noted ?Submit copies for distribution
?As requested ?Return for corrections ?Return corrected prints
?For review and comment ?
FOR BIDS DUE PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS Please call with
COPY TO
Signed:

i
Permit No.
C , Ell ; r_ (to be provided ky DWQ)
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Nlliavval a tr 64f 'Fi '
Division of Water Quality J U L 2 5 2000
t? 0 ? M
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APn,kA
eglona ,
WET DETENTION BASIN SUPPLEMENT
This form may be photocopied for use as an original
DWO Stormwater Management Plan Review:
A complete stormwater management plan submittal includes an application form, a wet detention basin
supplement for each basin, design calculations, and plans and specifications showing all basin and outlet
structure details.
1. PROJECT INFORMATION
Project Name:'
t't a S v-%_N,m r L ,v N V,;.4?_
Contact Person: poop ??,,^®, S Phone Number: SG
For projects with multiple basins, specify which basin this worksheet appli( (? ?]
elevations
Basin Bottom Elevation -7(c(,,,, do ft.
Permanent Pool Elevation _? 7 Z, c2? 0 ft.
Temporary Pool Elevation Jl "t 4-, 31 ft.
areas
Permanent Pool Surface Area-35,52 5 sq. ft.
Drainage Area 3 8.2 ac.
Impervious Area 2-9, Z ac.
volumes
J U L 2.7 2000
(floor of the basin)
(elevation of the or
(elevation of the di,
LOT VVATER QUALITY
Pr ?s•?
?..rit i ??, U : Br ANA
(water surface area at the orifice elevation)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
(on-site and off-site drainage to the basin)
Permanent Pool Volume 14 Z-, ozm cu. ft. (combined volume of main basin and forebay)
Temporary Pool Volume (0 1 5 s n cu. ft. (volume detained above the permanent pool)
Forebay Volume ` 51:5 5 cu. ft. (approximately 20% of total volume)
Other parameters
SA/DA 1
Diameter of Orifice
Design Rainfall
Design TSS Removal 2
191
7,.1
in.
(surface area to drainage area ratio from DWQ table)
(2 to 5 day temporary pool draw-down required)
Form SWU-102 Rev 3.99

(minimum 85% required)
Page 1 of 4
r
Footnotes:
I When using the Division SA/DA tables, the correct SA/DA ratio for permanent pool sizing should be computed based upon the
actual impervious % and permanent pool depth. Linear interpolation should be employed to determine the correct value for non-
standard table entries.
2 In the 20 coastal counties, the requirement for a vegetative filter may be waived if the wet detention basin is designed to provide
90% TSS removal. The NCDI NR BW manual provides design tables for both 85% TSS removal and 90% TSS removal.
II. REQUIRED ITEMS CHECKLIST
The following checklist outlines design requirements per the Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual
(N.C. Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources, February 1999) and Administrative Code
Section: 15 A NCAC 2H.1008.
Initial in the space provided to indicate the following design requirements have been met and supporting
documentation is attached. If the applicant has designated an agent in the Stormwater Management Permit
Application Form, the agent may initial below. If a requirement has not been met, attach justification.
Applicants Initials
----- a. The permanent pool depth is between 3 and 6 feet (required minimum of 3 feet).
ANIC b. The forebay volume is approximately equal to 20% of the basin volume.
c. The temporary pool controls runoff from the design storm event.
d. The temporary pool draws down in 2 to 5 days.
e. If required, a 30-foot vegetative filter is provided at the outlet (include non-erosive flow
calculations)
f. The basin length to width ratio is greater than 3:1.
Tatlis- g. The basin side slopes above the permanent pool are no steeper than 3:1.
'Fib ' h. A submerged and vegetated perimeter shelf with a slope of 6:1 or less (show detail).
i. Vegetative cover above the permanent pool elevation is. specified.
j. A trash rack or similar device is provided for both the overflow and orifice.
.k. A recorded drainage easement is provided for each basin including access to nearest right-
of-way.
1. If the basin is used for sediment and erosion control during construction, clean out of -the
basin is specified prior to use as a wet detention basin.
m. A mechanism is specified which will drain the basin for maintenance or an emergency.
M. WET DETENTION BASIN OPERATION AND MAWMNANCE AGREEMENT
The wet detention basin system is defined as the wet detention basin, pretreatment including forebays and the
vegetated filter if one is provided.
This system (check one) 0 does does not incorporate a vegetated filter at the outlet.
This system (check one) 0 does W does not incorporate pretreatment other than a forebay.
Form SWU-102 Rev 3.99 Page 2 of 4
'0 1 v '
i.
Maintenance activities shall be performed as follows
1. After every significant runoff producing rainfall event and at least monthly:
a. Inspect the wet detention basin system for sediment accumulation, erosion, trash accumulation,
vegetated cover, and general condition.
b. Check and clear the orifice of any obstructions such that drawdown of the temporary pool occurs
within 2 to 5 days as designed.
2. Repair eroded areas immediately, re-seed as necessary to maintain good vegetative 'cover mow vegetative
cover to maintain a maximum height of six inches, and remove trash as needed. .
3. Inspect and repair the collection system (i.e. catch basins, piping, swales, riprap,- etc.) quarterly to
maintain proper functioning.
4. Remove accumulated sediment from the wet detention basin system semi-annually or when depth is '
reduced to 75% of the original design depth (see diagram below). Removed sediment shall be disposed
of in an appropriate manner and shall be handled in a manner that will not adversely impact water quality
(i.e. stockpiling near a wet detention basin or stream, etc.)... -
The measuring device used to determine the sediment elevation shall be such that it will give an accurate
depth reading and not readily penetrate into accumulated sediments.
When .the permanent pool depth reads ?_ feet in the main pond, the sediment shall be removed.
When the permanent pool depth reads _41.L41' feet in the forebay, the sediment shall be removed.
BASIN DIAGRAM
(ft11 in the blanks)
V Permanent Pool Elevation M.-Q
Sediment Re oval El. &,Z_5 175
-------------- -- 75%
Sediment Removal Elevation g• 0
Bottom Ele anon 7610.f? % --------------------------------------------- -------
Bottom Elevation 7,66. 25%
S
FOREBAY MAIN POND
5. Remove cattails and other indigenous wetland plants when they cover 50% of the basin surface. These
plants shall be encouraged to grow along the vegetated shelf and forebay berm.
6. If the basin must be drained for an emergency or to perform maintenance, the flushing of sediment
through the emergency drain shall be minimized to the maximum extent practical.
Form SV U-102 Rev 3.99 Page 3 of 4
7. All domponents of the wet detention basin system shall be maintained in good working order.
f
r
I acknowledge and agree by my signature below that I am responsible for the performance of the seven
maintenance procedures listed above. I agree to notify DWQ of any problems with the system or prior to any
changes to the system or responsible party.
Print name:
Title:
;"z
Note: The legally responsible party should not be a homeowners association unless more than 50% of the lots have been sold and
a resident of the subdivision has been named the president.
L r) l' a Notary Public for the State of a V S .
County ' /.
of
do hereby certify that a ? Q
personally appeared before me this day of Y and acknowledge the due
execution of the forgoing wet detention basin maintenance requirements. Witness my hand and official seal,
Notary Pubk, FURM Munty G ,a
My commission expires MY OnMrftm Expires A? A 20,
Form SW- 102 Rev 3.99 Page 4 of 4
Date: ? 3, =aav
r• y R
STOI AI'ER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
This, form may be photocopied for use as an original
L , GEPVERAL INFORMATION
1. Applicants nalILe s ---
(pacify the name of the corpo._ration, individual, etc, who owns the project);
2. Print Owner/Signing Official's name and title (person legally responsible for facility and compliance):
3. Mailing Address for person listed in item 2 above:
ZS Cad ?E.°LEd-ir C ?? b uil 4-1
iTlk L"
City Q 'V 6 x r? ? State GR .Zip:
Telephone Number. ( -7 "a ) 5 S5 - 4-6 lac
4. Project Name (subdivision, facility, or establishment name - should be consistent with project name on
plans, specifications, letters, operation and maintenance agreements, etc.):
Ll t?1.R\ f i
5. Location of Project (street address):
in L 2 7. 2000
City Im's
County
6. Directions to project (from nearest major intersection):
/L?ol'..?-?..\3 6?-l?i SLa"?-' •y5 ? i? &i'?' e `?y'??1?0. ? ? C ii ?a1. ? C"?? G..1' ?S ? ..
G y:t3 . ?i 0? 4? L?ail¢3 ??s ?'Stl$S-?Sla?lS
'7. Latitude:- o Longitude:- Boo I c - -
of project
8. Contact person who can answer questions about the project:
Name: --®z,?> ,->.?•a ?; S Telephone Number: (s'Cc 4--) g4,-7 Z--?,•?
II. PERMIT INFORMATION:
L Specify whether project is (check one): X New Renewal Modification
Form SWU 101 Version 3.99 Page 1 of 4
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
2. If this application is being submitted as the resulrof a-renewal or modification to an existing permit, list the
existing permit number t?1 I and its issue date (if known)
3. Specify the type of project (check one):
Low Density High Density Redevelop _,X General Permit Other
4. Additional Project Requirements (check applicable blanks):
_,CAMA Major -Sedimentation/Erosion Control _444/401 Permit _NPDES Stomiwater
Information on required state permits can be obtained by contacting the Customer Service Center at
1-877-623-6748.
IIL PROJECT INFORMATION
1. In the space provided below, summarize how stormwater will be treated. Also attach a detailed narrative
(one to two pages) iescnbing stonnwater management for the project.
5 m Zee- W ta. , iL V'e CAS c a- 6 `I C eK t?sa 3 c s S c? D ? N t
tiS\ Q s2C; ?? ?\PrG`3 TC, 4 ..uzsc"_'
- Tt-t-? ? \tts'r Z' ?f • t26 t? ? S - R.?'-?--?? i'? ? -6z dJ ?,-?s ?-o i? iZc ? a _ _ ?_ _
2. Stormwater runoff from this project drains to the River basin.
3. Total Project Area:- 9 -acres 4. Project Built Upon Area:_ ,r_.s %
5. How many drainage areas does the project have? -Z-
6. Complete the following information for each drainage area. If there are more than two drainage areas in the
project, attach an additional sheet with the information for each area provided in the same format as below.
Receiving Stream Name
Receiving Stream Class
Drainage Area ( 4- 3 2A. 10 (4
Existing Impervious' Area
Pro osed Im ervious*Area (c?. t. ?? Z
Impervious' Area (total)

Form SITU-101 Version 3.99 Page 2 of 4
lrnpCTuiuus area zs aepnea as the auut upon area including, but not limited to, buildings, roads, parking areas,
sidewalks, gravel areas, etc.
:r
7. How was the off-site impervious area listed above derived? USG
4.4
IV. DEED RESTRICTIONS AND PROTECTIVE COVENANTS
The following italicized deed restrictions and protective covenants. are required to be recorded for all
subdivisions, outparcels and future development prior to the sale of any lot. If lot sizes vary significantly, a
table listing each lot number, size and the allowable built-upon area for each lot must be provided. as an
attachment.
1. The following covenants are intended to ensure ongoing compliance with state stormwater management permit
number as issued by the Division of Water Quality.. These covenants may
not be changed or deleted without the consent of the State.
2. No more than 01 r' square feet of any lot shall be covered by structures or impervious materials. '
Impervious materials include asphalt, gravel, concrete, brick, stone, slate or similar material but do not include wood
decking or the water surface of swimming pools.
3. Swales shall not be filled in, piped, or altered except as necessary to provide driveway crossings.
4. Built-upon area in excess of the permitted amount requires a state stormwater management permit modification prior to
construction.
5. All permitted runoff from outparcels or future development shall be directed into the permitted stonmwater control
system. These connections to the stormwater control system shall be per formed in a manner that maintains the
integrity and performance of the system as permitted.
By your signature below, you certify that the recorded deed restrictions and protective covenants for this project
shall include all the applicable items required above, that the covenants will be binding on all parties and
persons claiming under them, that they will run with the land, that the required covenants cannot be changed or
deleted without concurrence from the State, and that they will be recorded prior to the sale of any lot.
V. SUPPLEMENT FORMS
The applicable state stormwater man agement permit supplement form(s) listed below must be submitted for
each BMP specified for this project. Contact the Storzawater and General Permits Unit at [phone] for the
status and- availability of these forms.
Form SWU-102 Wet Detention Basin Supplement
Form SWU-103 Infiltration Basin Supplement
Form SWU 104 Low Density Supplement.
Form SWU--105 Curb Outlet System'Supplement
Form SW U 106 Off-Site System Supplement
Form SWU-107 Underground Infiltration Trench Supplement
Form SWU-108 Neuse River Basin Supplement
Form SWU-109 Innovative. Best Management Practice Supplement
Form SWU 101 Version 3.99
Page 3 of 4
VI. SUBMIT'T'AL REQUIREMENTS

Only complete application packages will be accepted and reviewed by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ).
A complete package includes all of the items listed below. The complete application package should be
submitted to the appropriate DWQ. Regional Office.
1. Please indicate that you have provided the following required information by initialing in the space
provided next to each item. =
Initials
® Original and one copy of the Stormwater Management Permit Application Form:
® One copy of the applicable Supplement Form(s) for each &MP
® Permit application processing fee of $424 (payable to NCDENR)
Detailed narrative description of stormwater treatment/management,
® Two copies of plans and specifications, including:
- Development/Project name
- Engineer and fret
-Legend
- North arrow
- Scale
- Revision number & date
- Mean high waterline
- Dimensioned property/project.boundary
- Location map with named streets or NCSR numbers
- Original contours, proposed contours, spot elevations, finished floor elevations
- Details of roads, drainage features, collection systems, and stormwater control measures
- Wetlands delineated, or a note on plans that none exist
- Existing drainage (including off-site), drainage easements, pipe sizes, runoff calculations
-Drainage areas delineated
- Vegetated buffers (where required)
VII. AGENT AUTHORIZATION
If you wish to designate authority to another individual or firm so that they may provide information on your
behalf, please complete this section:
Designated agent (individual or firm): _ C-?z^_s_cp : •%> o=.
Mailing Address: Z10 S . i,? I S wl la
City: C_ azer-- av Ua 6 State: C_ Zip: 77-&(6 -Wt)
Phone: (-- '8 (o 4-) Z. 3 S 5 Q-5
Fax: ( 43 (o 1- ) s 9 (S
VUL APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION
I, (print or type name of person listed in General Information, item 2)
certify that the information included on this permit application forrm is, to the best of my knowledge, correct and
that the project will be constructed in confo ce ith the approved plans, that the required deed restrictions
and protective covenants will be recorded, and e proposed project complies with the requirements of 1SA
NCAC 2H .1000. at I
Signature: ??. Date: ??.?, ??
Form SWU-101 Version 3.99 Page 4 of 4

?Yvif-"`x`.F?'%?xS'?'L1 Fly ?+?7 ?7??)-?,o%??ii<T?'df'\°m
±i iw7E01V L.L` M
Date Received Fee Paid ?
$ 1 ti 9 SR?¢ ?L G
Permit Number

State of North Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
This form may be photocopied for use as an original
L GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Applicants name (specify the name of the corporation, individual, etc. who owns the project):
- ?f?slf' S Wry owls ? (?? -
2. Print Owner/Signing Official's name and title (person legally responsible for facility and compliance):
3. Mailing Address for person listed in item 2 above:
City: fJ ct2?cZo S? State: CAA Zip: 3609 Z
Telephone Number. { ? ) 5 3 -S - Q-$ $o
4. Project Name (subdivision, facility, or establishment name - should be consistent with project name on
plans, specifications, letters, operation and maintenance agreements, etc.):
CDtA
5. Location of Project (street address):
IFJ U L 2 7 2000 U*?
- ti??? sro,? -r-o County: -
?xf • rs. Ott ?
NINT S()UR U BRANCH
6. Directions to project (from nearest major intersection):
- '? l Lo?q-TEt? i-?ofLTb?-? S W?S9 0z f??e?F ?S(onE OF ?,.??s"P- - _
Gz c?i"? C?,?C@R_ R y a S ?{iwt iY S ?'?A ? L L.yt:
.7. Latitude: M- 20 0 4 Longitude: SOS S of project
8. Contact person who can answer questions about the project:
Name:_ Telephone Number: (_g& 4-)
II. PERMIT INFORMATION:
1. Specify whether project is (check one): X ---New Renewal Modification -
Form SWU-101 Version 3.99
Page 1 of 4
AW
2. If this application is being submitted as the result'of a-renewal or modification to an existing permit, list the
existing permit number 1?11? and its issue date (if known)
3. Specify the type of project (check one):
Low Density High Density Redevelop -,Y-General Permit Other
4. Additional Project Requirements (check applicable blanks):
._CAMA Major -Sedimentation/Erosion Control 404/401 Permit _NPDES Stormwater
Information on required state permits can be obtained by contacting the Customer Service Center at
1-877-623-6748.
III, PROJECT INFORMATION
L In the space provided below, summarize how stormwater will be treated. Also attach a detailed narrative
(one to two pages) ;describing stormwater management for the project.
k%--? 13tL CAS 6 t+'c- 5 %4 CPAvcE{ 'RFa s k rI S < c,? ? ?cZAt ,J ilk
V t
U 1Si7?tt?c its?c?,,? P?PEg tp s, i,J T mniE- **Iyt na Daed? ? k4? coss"T Pn rsg? W AL-k- 15,m a-C
T1t???QST ?'o(= 20 0 tilr- S RLe?P.S iT cso-c-Z A 4?, ?0 2ro+1. --- _
2. Stormwater runoff from this project drains to the D;,er
3. Total Project Area:_ 3 5, -C -acres
5. How many drainage areas does the project have? 2--
6. Complete the following information for each drainage area. If there are more than two drainage areas in the
project, attach an additional sheet with the information for each area provided in the same format as below.
Receiving Stream Name
Receiving Stream Class
Drainage Area
Existing Impervious' Area
Proposed Impervious*Area
% Impervious' Area
........... _.-..
_ ..._.__.w....
On-site Buildings
On-site Streets
On-site Parking
On-site Sidewalks
Other on-site

t. l
9 _ ,z-
15:o
L I Total- t o g Ptc Total:
Impervious area is defined as the built upon area including, but not limited to, buildings, roads, parking areas,
sidewalks, gravel areas, etc.
asui.
4. Project Built Upon Area: 7 S %
Form SWU-101 Version 3.99 Page 2 of 4
7` How was the off-site impervious area listed above derived? O:SG > 'ia q ?c Mq?s s
U 1?,.? a? t ? SPEW Tt® ?-!
IV. DEED RESTRICTIONS AND PROTECTIVE COVENANTS
The following italicized deed restrictions and protective covenants are required to be recorded for all
subdivisions, outparcels and future development prior to the sale of any lot. If lot sizes vary significantly, a
table listing each lot number, size and the allowable built-upon area for each lot-must be provided as an
attachment.
1. The following covenants are intended to ensure ongoing compliance with state stormwater management permit
number as issued by the Division of Water Quality. These covenants may
not be changed or deleted without the consent of the State.
2. No more than Olk square feet of any lot shall be covered by structures or impervious materials.
Impervious materials include asphalt, gravel, concrete, brick, stone, slate or similar material but do not include wood
decking or the water surface of swimming pools.
3. Swales shall not be filled in, piped, or altered except as necessary to provide driveway crossings.
4. Built-upon area in excess of the permitted amount requires a state stormwater management permit modification prior to
construction.
5. All permitted runoff from outparcels or future development shall be directed into the permitted stormwater control
system. These connections to the stormwater control system shall be performed in a manner that maintains the
integrity and performance of the system as permitted.
By your signature below, you certify that the recorded deed restrictions and protective covenants for this project
shall include all the applicable items required above, that the covenants will be binding on all parties and
persons claiming under them, that they will run with the land, that the required covenants cannot be changed or
deleted without concurrence from the State, and that they will be recorded prior to the sale of any lot.
V. SUPPLEMENT FORMS
The applicable state stormwater management permit supplement form(s) listed below must be submitted for
each BMP specified for this project. Contact the Stormwater and General Permits Unit at [phone].for the
status and availability of these forms.
Form SWU-102
Form SWU-103
Form SWU-104
Form SWU-105
Form SWU-106
Form SWU-107
Form SWU-108
Form SWU-109
Wet Detention Basin Supplement
Infiltration Basin Supplement
Low Density Supplement.
Curb Outlet System'Supplement
Off-Site System Supplement
Underground Infiltration Trench Supplement
Neuse River Basin Supplement
Innovative, Best Management Practice Supplement
Form SWU-101 Version 3.99 Page 3 of 4
VI. SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
1
Only complete application packages will be accepted and reviewed by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ).
A complete package includes all of the items listed below. The complete application package should be
submitted to the appropriate DWQ Regional Office.
1. Please indicate that you have provided the following required information by initialing in the space
provided next to each item.
Initials
• Original and one copy of the Stormwater Management Permit Application Form _ g
• One copy of the applicable Supplement Form(s) for each BMP
• Permit application processing fee of $420 (payable to NCDENR) a?,;
• Detailed narrative description of stormwater treatment/management k3
• Two copies of plans and specifications, including:
- Development/Project name
- Engineer and firm
- Legend
- North arrow
- Scale
- Revision number & date
- Mean high water line
- Dimensioned property/project boundary
- Location map with named streets or NCSR numbers
- Original contours, proposed contours, spot elevations, finished floor elevations
- Details of roads, drainage features, collection systems, and stormwater control measures
- Wetlands delineated, or a note on plans that none exist
- Existing drainage (including off-site), drainage easements, pipe sizes, runoff calculations
- Drainage areas delineated
-Vegetated buffers (where required)
VII. AGENT AUTHORIZATION
If you wish to designate authority to another individual or firm so that they may provide information on your
behalf, please complete this section:
Designated agent (individual or firm): rcr yLo,,,k, , V C-r o,--4 0C.
Mailing Address: Z,09- k j3,
S? ?? Av C
City: State: C Zip: 7 9(c 09
Phone: C = 8(0 4- ) Z-3 3 5457
Fax: ( 8 (o I- ) Z--_,s,- "16
VIII. APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION
I, (print or type name of person listed in General information, item 2)
AP?EDK .
certify that the information included on this permit application form is, to the best of my knowledge, correct and
that the project will be constructed in confo ce ith the approved plans, that the required deed restrictions
and protective covenants will be recorded, and t e proposed project complies with the requirements of 15A
NCAC 2H.1000.
Signature: -a-Y....SJ-? .? Dater ??t 13
Form SWU-101 Version 3.99 Page 4 of 4
Stornr>water Management Treatment Procedures
Hanes Commons Shopping Center
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Project Location:
The project is a proposed commercial development adjacent to Hanes Mail Boulevard in Winston-
Salem, North Carolina.
Project Description
The project is being proposed to be developed to contain a 148,000 sf Costco, two 30,000 sf
"mini-anchors", a 6,400 sf restaurant, a 5,000 sf restaurant, and various shops space totaling
46,100 sf. The site will consist of these buildings, as well as the associated parking, storm
drainage, landscaping, and detention facilities.
Treatment Procedures:
We are proposing a wet detention basin to effectively treat and release the stormwater runoff.
The proposed basin has been designed to be located in the northeast comer of the property
adjacent to Hanes Mail Boulevard.
The stormwater will be collected using a series of catch basins and drop inlets. Once the
stormwater enters the catch basin or drop inlet, it will be carried via the storm drain network to
the wet detention pond. The runoff will enter the forebay for settling of the stormwater. A
vegetated shelf has been created just below the permanent pool elevation of the pond to filter
sediment and improve overall water quality. The storm drain network will create some storage
area for the pond that has been neglected in our study for a conservative design.
The pond was designed using NCDENR guidelines for sediment removal. The design of the pond
was performed using a 85% TSS removal. The pond and forebay was designed to be 6' deep. The
proposed surface area for the basin meets the required surface area.
Due to constraints on the site, it was impractical to design the pond to have an emergency outlet
that drained the pond via gravity flow. In the case of an emergency and the pond has to be
drained, we are proposing to bring portable pumps in to drain the pond. These pumps will beset
up to drain through the outlet device.
We have designed the outlet structure(s) to control the 1-inch, 2-yr, I0-yr, & 25-yr storms to pre-
developed rates. The 50yr & 100-yr storms will be routed through the structure without
overtopping the pond. The 1-inch rainfall is being controlled by using (2) 2.7" orifices to release
the 1" runoff in a 2-5 day time period. The larger storms are controlled by a variety of orifices
and weirs to release the runoff at a predeveloped rate. The discha_rgi1.[..b..anto_a.42",pipe and a
54" pipe under Hanes Mail Boulevard.
p ???OM[
f
N.C.
JUL 2 5 2000
Winstan-Sedoff
SRegionalOffic(
REPORT & CALCULATIONS 14-G
FOR
' Hanes Commons - Costco
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
REVISED SUBMITTAL
07/13/00

tJ U L 2 7
CHEFS ?t r9
POINY
_-
?®tt1111t/1???
CA ?s
°°°°....
Z-1 E
; SEAL
025419
Nyy .
FREELAND & KAUFFMAN, INC.
ENGINEERS - LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
209 WEST STONE AVE.
GREENVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA 29609

p,
r?
71
0
Winston Salem Drainage Study
Hanes Commons Shopping Center
Hanes Mall Blvd. neat to Lowes
Forsyth County, N.C.
DRAINAGE STUDY AND WATER QUALITY REPORT
The following is the drainage study for the proposed Hanes Commons Shopping Center to
be built along Hanes Mall Blvd. across from the existing Home Depot and south of the
existing Lowes Store. The site is being proposed to be developed to contain a +/- 148,000
s.f. Costco Store, two 30,000 s.f. "mini-anchors", a 6,400 s.f restaurant, a 5000 s.f
restaurant, and various shops space totaling 46,100 s.f. There is also off-site runoff that
1b will drain on to the site, although a large portion of the off-site runoff from the Lowes site
and Hanes Mall Blvd. will be routed around the site. The report includes determination of
required pond size for water quality as well as quantity. The pond will be analyzed based
upon the 10 year and 25 year storm, as well as for water quality standards. The existing
stormwater system along Hanes Mall Blvd. will be utilized to take the runoff from the
pond as this is where the current runoff pattern lies. All runoff from the developed site will
be directed to the proposed pond located in the western front corner of the site. The new
pond will be sized to handle the first 1" of runoff and release it over a 48 hour period, the
2, 10, and 25 year storm events and restrict these storm events to the pre-developed rates.
The pond will have a staged outlet to manage each storm. The 100 year storm event will
overtop the outlet structure but will not overtop the pond.
The stormwater runoff calculations shown in this report are based on the SCS TR-55
Method as required by the State of North Carolina and the City of Winston Salem. The
runoff numbers and hydrographs are included.
0
a
0
Existing Conditions:
The property is divided into three major drainage areas. The first is on the eastern side and
leads from south to north towards Hanes Mall Blvd. The runoff drains through wooded
areas and eventually into an existing channel that flows north to Hanes Mall Blvd. From
there the runoff enters a 54" pipe and is conveyed down the road to an existing creek. This
drainage area also picks up the runoff from the Lowes Store on the east side and a portion
of Hanes Mall Blvd. The runoff from Lowes and the road will not be affected by the new
development as it will be piped around the system. The second drainage area encompasses
the "middle" of the site and takes in most of the proposed development area. There is also
an area of off-site drainage to the south of the site that flows through this section and will
continue to flow through in the developed state. Again, the flow sheets through wooded
areas into an existing channel and ultimately to a 42" culvert at Hanes Mall Blvd. The last
drainage area is a small section in the southwest corner that drains south and west off the
property into a completely separate drainage basin. This area will not be affected by the
development. The total site is +/- 40.0 acres with areas of off-site drainage coming onto
the property.
Slopes on the property vary but in general the site slopes from south to north. The bulk of
the slopes are 10% and get somewhat flatter in areas in and around the creek.
Soil types consist of type "B" soils as defined in the TR-55 manual and the Handbook on
Erosion Control design as issued by the state. These soils are mostly clays and sands with
small elements of loam and loamy sands. These soils are well drained, are moderately
permeable and have a medium capacity for water. Surface runoff is generally rapid to very
rapid.
The closest body of water to the site is "Little Creek" located north and west of the
property that leads west. Wetlands described as waters of the United States (creeks) are
present on the site. These wetlands areas have been approved by the State of North
Carolina and U. S. Corps of Engineers to be impacted by this development. However, the
mitigation plan has not been finalized.

0
0
Developed Conditions:
In the developed condition the site will be used for commercial development. This will
consist of several "big box" users. There will also be smaller shops spaces available that
may total 46,100 s. f. The development will include a field of parking, stormdrain system,
and all accompanying utilities. The developed condition will also include the installation of
a stormwater pond to control both quantity and quality of runoff that leaves the site. The
pond has been sized to meet both the State of North Carolina requirements and the City of
Winston Salem Requirements.
a
0
0
0
Runoff Calculations: Existing Conditions:
The runoff for both the existing and developed condition will be calculated using the TR-
55 Method. This method considers land use, time of travel for runoff, and rainfall events
as prescribed by the US National Weather Service for this particular area, and the size of
the area to determine stormwater runoff.
The rainfall amounts will vary based on the design storm and these numbers are taken
from the precipitation maps issued by the U. S. National Weather Service. The area is also
analyzed to determine its current land use and a Runoff Curve Number is then generated
for the site. Next the time of concentration (travel in minutes) of the runoff from the most
remote point of the drainage basin to the outlet point is determined and these items are
used in the calculations to determine the runoff Q.
Runoff Curve Number :
The runoff curve number is based on land use for each area and the percent of the area
with that type of use. For example, pavement has a runoff number of 98 as it is almost
entirely made up of impervious area. This number also takes into account the soil type as
determined by the Soil Conservation Service. The soils are then classified as type AB, C
& D which each have varying rates at which water runs off. This site is comprised of
mostly Type B soils. Since the majority of this site is one use type we will use this CN
number the entire site which will give us a more conservative design. Again, due to the
stormwater management pond for Lowe's being installed after the first expansion, we will
consider the existing condition to be the condition prior to the first expansion. This would
include 5.00 acres of pavement and roof. The CN for this use is as follows.
Area #1- 14.43 Area # 2 - 24.66
acres,Woods & acres, Woods &
Grass (type B soils) Roof
(type B'soils)
CN = 56 CN = 55
0
Time of Concentration:
The time of concentration for the existing drainage area will be calculated using three
types of flow. Sheet flow for flow overland, not in a defined channel, Shallow
Concentrated flow for any sheet flow after 300 feet assuming that the flow has
concentrated somewhat, and Open channel flow for any flow through pipes or ditches.
The time of concentration is a function of slope, the roughness coefficient of the surface
the water is flowing over, and in the case of open channel flow, the velocity. For Sheet
Flow the T = {0.007(nL)110.8)/P^0.5 s^0.4 and for shallow concentrated flow the time is
based on the velocity and .the length per Fig. 3-1 from TR-55. The Open Channel time is
based and the velocity from Manning's equation and this velocity is divided into the length
a
I
D
to get the time. All of this information is fed into the TR-55 computer program and the Tc
is as follows for each area:
Area #I
First 300 ft. Sheet
Flow @ 7.33%
slope, Wooded
Next 360 ft. Shallow
Conc. Flow @
10.3%Q slope,
111-. A-A
Next 830 ft. Opoen
Channel Flow @ 4.0
ft!s
The total Tc is;
Tc = 34.2 min.
Area # 2
First' 300 ft. Sheet Next 360 ft. Shallow Next 830 ft. Open
Flow @ 7.33% Conc. Flow'@ Channel Flow@ 4.0
slope, Wooded 10.3% slope, ft/s
Wooded
The total Tc is;
Tc = 34.8 min.
D
Rainfall
From the U.S. National Weather Service maps the rainfall amounts can be determined.
These maps show the rainfall amounts for various design storms (i.e. 2, 10, 100 yr.) with
the totals being in inches. These are derived for Forsythe County and the various storms
are as follows:
2 yr. - 3.5 in.
10 yr.-5.0in
25 yr. - 6.0 in.
100 yr. - 7.2 in.
This is based on a "Type II" storm as defined by SCS.

Runoff Calculations
b
P
Per the TR-55 Method the runoff will be calculated for the existing condition and a
hydrograph will be generated for this runoff showing Q vs. time. This will be done for the
2 year and 10 year storm events. The results are as follows:
Pre Developed Area #I
Pre-Developed Rainfall Runoff.
Storm Event in cfs
2 year 3.5 in 2.34 cfs
10 year 5.0 9.75 cfs
25 year 6.0 16.52 cfs
100 year 7.0 in 25.78 cfs
Pre Developed Area #2
Pre-Developed Rainfall Runoff
Storm Event Q in cfs
2 year 3.5 in 3.36 cfs
10 year 5.0 15.31 cfs
25 year 6.0 26.52 cfs
100 year 7.0 in 42.05 cfs
The runoff from area 2 will be combined with the off-site runoff to the rear of the
proposed development to get the total pre-developed runoff from area 2. This is:
Total including Off-Site from Pre Developed Area #2
Pre-Developed Rainfall Runoff
Storm Event Q in cfs
2 year 3.5 in 8.34 cfs
10 year 5.0 25.90 cfs
25 year 6.0 41.24 cfs
100 year 7.0 in 61.99 cfs
0
I

2
2
1
v
U
1
0.
0,
1
1 -SCS Runoff-2Yr-Qp=2.34cfs
Time (hrs)
/ Hyd. 1
0
0 5 10 15 20 25
71
a
0
1 - SCS Runoff - 25 Yr - Qp = 16.52 cfs
2
1
1*02
0 1
CJ
0
5
i
0
i
5
i
i
0
0 5 10
Time (hrs)
15 20 25
/ Hyd. 1
0
0
1 - SCS Runoff -100 Yr - Qp = 25.78 cfs
N
U
a
Time (hrs)
/ Hyd. 1
0
0 5 10 15 20 25

? 2 - SCS Runoff - 2 Yr - Qp = 3.36 cfs
0

C
•
0
2 - SCS Runoff - 25 Yr - Qp = 26.52 cfs
30----
25-
20
15 / Hyd. 2
C1
10
5
0
0 5 10 15 20 25
Time (hrs)
0
0
0
a
v
CJ
Time (hrs)
2 - SCS Runoff -100 Yr - Op = 42.05 cfs
/ Hyd. 2
0
0 5 10 15 20 25
r
D
0
aTA4..??.- Td Tbt i,.?r
11 - Combine - 2 Yr - Op = 8.34 cfs
1
CY
Hyd. 2
/ Hyd. 4
/ Hyd. 11
Time (hrs)
61 I'IcL... 6 r-r- - Sa-'..
0
0 5 10 15 20 25
D
0
0
I
11 - Combine - 25 Yr - Qp = 41.24 cfs
50
i
40 Hyd. 2
i
30
v
CY / Hyd. 4
20
I
10,
Hyd. 11
0 5 10 15 20 25
Time (hrs)
0
0
0
C
11 -Combine -100 Yr - Qp = 61.99 cfs
so
? Hyd.2
60
40-
0 40
/ Hyd.4
20-'
?
I I L / Hyd. 11 I -Now O
0 5 10 15 20 25
Time (hrs)
0
D

C
Developed Condition to Pond
Next the developed condition will be evaluated for the drainage area to the Pond. The
runoff number will then be compared to the pre-developed rate and the pond will be
designed to limit outflow to less than the pre-developed rate.
Runoff Curve Number
The developed condition will consist of parking areas and the roof areas of the shopping
center. This water will sheet across the parking lot to catch basins and be conveyed via
pipes and ditches to the pond. The post developed runoff will also include the off-site from
the rear of the site.
Shopping Center Paved & Wooded Areas, A = 7.80 Grassed areas, A - 1.49
Roof Area = 29.16 acres acres. acres
Type B soils
CN=98 CN=55 CN=58
Total weighted CN = 88
Time of Concentration
The time of concentration for the developed condition will be comprised of sheet flow for
the first 300 feet across wooded areas, then shallow concentrated flow to the pipe system,
and finally open channel flow through pipes to the pond.
First300 ft. Sheet Next Shallow Canc. Lastly Open Channel
Flow @ 5.33% Flow- rQ 5.5% slope, Flow next 1675 ft.
slope, wooded paved areas at avg V=6.0 ft/s, in
vipe
Total Tc = 39.0 min.
Rainfall
The rainfall from the U.S. National Weather Service (as stated above) are as follows:
2 yr. - 3.50 in
25 yr. - 6.0 in
100 yr. - 7.20 in
0
D
0
0
Runoff Calculations
Per the TR-55 Method the runoff will be calculated for the existing condition and a
hydrograph will be generated for this runoff showing Q vs. time. This will be done for the
2 year, 10 year, 25 year, and 100 year storm events. The results are as follows:
Post Developed Rainfall Rate Runoff cfs
Storm Event in cfs
2 year 3.5 in 69.64 cfs
10 year 5.0 in 114.43 cfs
25 year 6.0 in. 144.79 cfs
100 year 7.2 in 181.38 cfs
These numbers will be used to develop hydrographs through the pond.
0
'Pos-r -D avs
)a ?Oklp
10 - Combine - 2 Yr - Qp = 69.64 cfs
v
C?
0
Time (hrs)
/ Hyd. 3
/ Hyd. 4
/ Hyd. 10
0
0 5 10 15 20 25
N
9
0
10 - Combine - 25 Yr - Qp = 144.79 cfs
150
i
Hyd. 3
100
j
V
C'1
? j /Hyd. 4
50
I , I
I
Hyd. 10
o
0 5 10 15 20 25
Time (hrs)
0

10 - Combine -100 Yr - Qp = 181.38 cfs
2
1
C1

Time (hrs)
Hyd. 3
/ Hyd. 4
/ Hyd. 10
0
0 5 10 15 20 25
0
POND SIZING AND ROUTING
The required pond sizing as stated earlier will be based on water quantity requirements
and water quality requirements. The required quantity is based on the 1" of runoff being
stored and released over a 48 hour period, and storing and releasing the 2 year and 25 year
storms at their pre-developed rates. The quality storage will be provided by supplying a
defined storage area (in square feet) as determined by the depth of the permanent pool and
the surface area to drainage area ratio.
The pond will be a surface pond with a.bottom elevation of 766.0, a permanent pool
elevation off 772.0, and a top elevation of 780.75. Based on the proposed depth of 6 feet,
the required surface area for the 38.2 acre drainage area is 32,781 s.f. The surface area
9 provided at elevation 772.0 is 35,575 s.f. Based on these requirements we have sized the
outlet to release the runoff at the various stages. The resulting outlet will have to release
runoff to the two existing culverts on Hanes Mall Blvd. For this reason there will actually
be two outlets for the pond, each sized for the individual pre-developed areas. To release
point `A' the outlet will have a 2.72" orifice. This will be accomplished with the use of a 2
'/2" pvc pipe at elevation 772.0 that will elbow down into the permanent pool. The 2 year
storm will be released through an orifice. The orifice will be 7.0" in diameter placed at the
top of the 1" storage (el. 774.37). The 25 year storm will be release via a weir at the top
of the 2 year storage elevation. This weir will be 0.7' in length at elevation 776.7. The 100
year storm will overtop the riser and exit through the outlet pipe. For the release to Point
"B' the outlet will have the same 2 '/2" pvc pipe. The 2 year release will be through an
orifice placed at the top of the 1" storage (el. 774.37). The orifice will be 15" in diameter.
The 25 year storm will be released through a weir at the top of the 2 year storage
elevation. The weir will be 1.40 feet in length. Again, the 100 year storm will overtop the
riser and exit through the outlet pipe. Refer to the calculations included for more details of
required volumes. The outlet pipes from each riser are sized as follows;
Manning's Equation - Q= 1.49/n x A x R^2/3 X S^1/2
From.this equation it is determined that the required pipe size for each outlet will be 42".
Refer to the hydrographs for reservoir routing showing storage elevations, release rates,
etc.. The results are as follows:
POND Stage Storage
Volume Allowable
Release Actual Release
First 1" 774.37 101,930 0.6 cfs 0.6 cfs
2 . 776.70 191,781 cf 10.67 cfs 10.30 cfs
25 . 779.97 349,550 cf 57.68 cfs 57.00 cfs
100 yr. 780.69 386,103 cf N/a 116.33 cfs
0

As can be seen in the above table the release rate from the pond for the 2 yr. and 25 yr.
storm events is below the allowable release rates in the pre-developed condition. The
required storage volume and the pond hydrographs show that the water is released over a
period of 48 hours or longer.
0
0
C
a Hydrograph Plot
English
Hyd. No. 13
Pond Routing
Hydrograph type = Reservoir
Storm frequency = 2 yrs
Inflow hyd. No. = 10
Max. Elevation = 776.70 ft
Peak discharge
Time interval
Reservoir name
Max. Storage
= 10.30 cfs
= 1 min
= Front Pond all
= 191,781 cuft
storage Indication method used. Total Volume = 232,521 cuR
r
13 - Reservoir - 2 Yr - Qp =10.30 ds

0
Time (hrs)
/ Hyd. 10
/ Hyd. 13
0
0 5 10 15 20 25
Hydrograph Plot
English
Hyd. No. 13
Pond Routing
Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 10.30 cfs
Storm frequency = 2 yrs Time interval = 1 min
Inflow hyd. No. = 10 Reservoir name = Front Pond all
Max. Elevation = 776.70 ft Max. Storage = 191,781 cult
Storage Indication method used. Total Volume = 232,521 Cuft
10
0
13 - Reservoir - 2 Yr - Max. El. = 776.70 ft
777
77
V 77
as
W 77
77
77
0 5 10 15 20 25
Time (hrs)
i

6
5
4
3
2
C?
Hydrograph Plot
English
r
lb
Hyd. No. 13
Pond Routing
Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 35.48 cfs
Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time interval = 1 min
Inflow hyd. No. = 10 Reservoir name = Front Pond all
Max. Elevation = 778.82 ft Max. Storage = 291,413 cuft
Stmape Indication method used.
Total Volume = 447,595 tuft
13 - Reservoir -10 Yr - Qp = 35.48 cfs
150
/ Hyd. 10
100
C!
50 I i
i
/ Hyd. 13
0
0 5 10 15 20 25
Time (hrs)
0
Hydrograph Plot
English
Hyd. No. 13
Pond Routing
Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 35.48 cfs
Storm frequency = 10 yrs Time interval = 1 min
Inflow hyd. No. = 10 Reservoir name = Front Pond all
Max. Elevation = 778.82 ft Max. Storage = 291,413 cuft
Storage Indmton method used. Total Volume = 447,596 cult
a
0
13 - Reservoir -10 Yr - Max. El. = 778.82 ft
779.0-
777.6-
776.2-
>
_d
W 774.8-
773.4-
772.0.
5 10 15 20 25
Time (hrs)

Hydrograph Plot
English
0
a
Hyd. No. 13
Pond Routing
Hydrograph type = Reservoir
Storm frequency = 25 yrs
Inflow hyd. No. = 10
Max. Elevation = 780.00 ft
Peak discharge
Time interval
Reservoir name
Max. Storage
= 57.00 cfs
= 1 min
= Front Pond all
349,550 cult
Storage Indication method used. Total Volume = 596,607 cuft
13 - Reservoir - 25 Yr - Qp = 57.00 ds
150
/ Hyd. 10
100
a
50
/ Hyd. 13
0
0 5 10 15 20 25
Time (hrs)
0
• Hydrograph Plot
English
Hyd. No. 13
Pond Routing
Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 57.00 cfs
Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time interval = 1 min
Inflow hyd. No. = 10 Reservoir name = Front Pond all
Max. Elevation = 780.00 ft Max. Storage = 349,550 cuft
Storage Indication metlrod used. Total Volume = 596,607 cuft
!
!
13 - Reservoir - 25 Yr - Max. El. = 780.00 ft
780.0-
778.4-
776.8
_m
to 775.2
773.6
772.
0 5 10 15 20 25
Time (hrs)

I
,
i
I
I
0

Hydrograph Plot
English
Hyd. No. 13
Pond Routing
Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 87.33 cfs
Storm frequency = 50 yrs Time interval = 1 min
Inflow hyd. No. = 10 Reservoir name = Front Pond all
Max. Elevation = 780.43 ft Max. Storage = 371,482 cuft
storage indication method used. Total Volume = 687,370 cult
0
0
13 - Reservoir - 50 Yr - Qp = 87.33 dfs
200
15 / Hyd. 10
0
100
U
5
/ Hyd. 13
Time (hrs)
i
I
I
?
i

0 5 1 0 15 2
0
0
0
25
0
0

Hydrograph Plot
English
le
a
Hyd. No. 13
Pond Routing
Hydrograph type = Reservoir
Storm frequency = 50 yrs
Inflow hyd. No. = 10
Max. Elevation = 780.43 ft
Peak discharge
Time interval
Reservoir name
Max. Storage
= 87.33 cfs
= 1 min
= Front Pond all
= 371,482 cuft
Stage Indication melded used. Total Volume = 687,370 cult
13 - Reservoir - 50 Yr - Max. El. = 780.43 ft
781.0-
779.2-
777.4
777.4
>
_m
W 775.6
773.8
772.
0 5 10 15 20 25
Time (hrs)

i
I
'
i
i
0

Hydrograph Plot
English
0
a
Hyd. No. 13
Pond Routing
Hydrograph type = Reservoir
Storm frequency = 100 yrs
Inflow hyd. No. = 10
Max. Elevation = 780.71 ft
Peak discharge
Time interval
Reservoir name
Max. Storage
= 116.33 cfs
= 1 min
= Front Pond all
= 386,103 cuft
Storage Indication metfiod used. Total Volume = 778,841 tuft
I
13 - Reservoir -100 Yr - Qp =116.33 ds
200-
150- / Hyd. 10
100
50 j
/ Hyd. 13
i
0
0 5 10 15 20 25
Time (hrs)
0
Hydrograph Plot
English
Hyd. No. 13
Pond Routing
Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 116.33 cfs
Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time interval = 1 min
Inflow hyd. No. = 10 Reservoir name = Front Pond all
Max. Elevation = 780.71 ft Max. Storage = 386,103 cult
storage Indication method used. Total Volume = 778,841 tuft
i
0
13 - Reservoir -100 Yr - Max. El. = 780.71 ft
781 0
779.2
777.4
W 775.6
773.8
772.
10 15 20 25
Time (hrs)

,
i
0

0 5

Reservoir Report Page 1
English
Reservoir No. 1 - Front Pond all Surface
Pond Data
Pond storage is based on known contour areas
Stage / Storage Table
Stage Elevation Contour area Incr. Storage Total storage
ft ft sqft cult cult
0.00 772.00 35,575 0 0
1.00 773.00 38,280 36,928 36,928
2.00 774.00 40,175 39,228 76,156
3.00 775.00 42,100 41,138 117,294
4.00 776.00 44,070 43,085 160,379
5.00 777.00 45,700 44,885 205,264
6.00 778.00 47,310 46,505 251,769
7.00 779.00 48,940 48,125 299,894
8.00 780.00 50,595 49,768 349,662
9.00 780.75 52,000 51,298 400,960
Culvert / Orifice Structures
[A?] [B] [C] [D]
0
Weir Structures
[A] [B] [C] ID]
Rise in = 70.0 2.7 7.0 15.0 Crest Len ft = 0.6 1.4 24.0 0.0
Span in = 70.0 2.7 7.0 15.0 Crest El. ft = 776.70 776.70 779.97 0.00
No. Barrels = 1 2 1 1 Weir Coeff. = 3.30 3.30 3.00 0.00
Invert El. ft = 772.00 772.00 774.37 774.37 Eqn. Exp. = 1.50 1.50 1.50 0.00
Length ft = 250.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Multi-Stage = Yes Yes Yes No
Slope % = 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
N -Value = .013 .013 .013 .013
Orif. Coeff. = 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60
Multi-Stage = ----- Yes Yes Yes Tailwater Elevation = 0.00 ft

Note: All outflows have been analyzed under inlet and outlet control.
Stage / Storage / Discharge Table
Stage Storage Elevation Civ A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Discharge
ft cult ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs
0.00 0 772.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- 0.00
0.10 3,693 772.10 0.12 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- 0.04
0.20 7,386 772.20 0.51 0.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- 0.12
0.30 11,078 772.30 1.06 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.17
0.40 14,771 772.40 1.91 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- 0.21
0.50 18,464 772.50 3.13 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- 0.24
0.60 22,157 772.60 4.07 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- 0.27
0.70 25,850 772.70 6.00 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 --- 0.29
0.80 29,542 772.80 7.39 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 --- 0.31
0.90 33,235 772.90 8.96 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.34
1.00 36,928 773.00 10.72 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 --- 0.36
Continues on next page...
0
Front Pond all Surface Page 2
Stage / Storage / Discharge Table
Stage Storage Elevation Clv A Clv B Civ C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Discharge
It cult It cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs
1.10 40,851 773.10 12.67 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.38
1.20 44,774 773.20 14.82 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 --- 0.40
1.30 48,696 773.30 19.01 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- 0.41
1.40 52,619 773.40 21.73 0.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 --- 0.43
1.50 56,542 773.50 24.65 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- 0.45
1.60 60,465 773.60 27.79 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 --- 0.46
1.70 64,388 773.70 31.14 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.48
1.80 68,310 773.80 32.04 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 --- 0.49
1.90 72,233 773.90 35.64 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 --- 0.51
2.00 76,156 774.00 39.43 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- 0.52
2.10 80,270 774.10 43.43 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 --- 0.54
2.20 84,384 774.20 47.61 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 --- 0.55
2.30 88,497 774.30 51.97 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 --- 0.56
2.40 92,611 774.40 56.50 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 --- 0.58
2.50 96,725 774.50 61.19 0.59 0.06 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.73
2.60 100,839 774.60 66.04 0.60 0.16 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.00 --- 1.03
2.70 104,953 774.70 71.02 0.60 0.31 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 --- 1.45
2.80 109,066 774.80 72.32 0.61 0.48 0.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 --- 1.92
2.90 113,180 774.90 77.47 0.61 0.64 1.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 2.54
3.00 117,294 775.00 82.74 0.62 0.75 1.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 --- 3.11
3.10 121,603 775.10 88.10 0.63 0.85 2.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.70
3.20 125,911 775.20 93.54 0.63 0.94 2.72 0.00 0.00 0.00 --- 4.30
3.30 130,220 775.30 99.04 0.64 1.03 3.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 --- 4.88
3.40 134,528 775.40 104.59 0.65 1.11 3.74 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 5.49
3.50 138,837 775.50 110.18 0.65 1.18 4.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 --- 6.06
3.60 143,145 775.60 115.78 0.66 1.25 4.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 --- 6.53
3.70 147,454 775.70 117.38 0.67 1.31 4.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 --- 6.94
3.80 151,762 775.80 123.02 0.68 1.37 5.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- 7.35
3.90 156,071 775.90 128.63 0.68 1.43 5.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 -- 7.74
4.00 160,379 776.00 134.22 0.69 1.49 5.92 0.00 0.00 0.00 --- 8.10
4.10 164,868 776.10 139.75 0.70 1.54 6.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 --- 8.45
4.20 169,356 776.20 145.22 0.71 1.60 6.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 --- 8.79
4.30 173,845 776.30 150.61 0.72 1.65 6.75 0.00 0.00 0.00 --- 9.11
4.40 178,333 776.40 155.90 0.73 1.70 7.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 --- 9.43
4.50 182,822 776.50 161.08 0.73 1.74 7.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 9.73
4.60 187,310 776.60 166.15 0.74 1.79 7.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 --- 10.02
4.70 191,799 776.70 171.08 0.75 1.84 7.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 --- 10.30
4.80 196,287 776.80 175.86 0.76 1.88 7.94 0.07 0.14 0.00 -- 10.79
4.90 200,776 776.90 183.12 0.77 1.92 8.15 0.19 0.40 0.00 --- 11.44
5.00 205,264 777.00 187.42 0.77 1.97 8.37 0.34 0.74 0.00 --- 12.19
5.10 209,915 777.10 191.56 0.78 2.01 8.57 0.53 1.14 0.00 --- 13.03
5.20 214,565 777.20 195.51 0.79 2.05 8.77 0.73 1.60 0.00 --- 13.94
5.30 219,216 777.30 201.00 0.79 2.09 8.97 0.97 2.10 0.00 -- 14.92
5.40 223,866 777.40 204.43 0.80 2.13 9.16 1.22 2.65 0.00 -- 15.95
5.50 228,517 777.50 208.86 0.80 2.17 9.35 1.49 3.23 0.00 --- 17.04
5.60 233,167 777.60 212.64 0.81 2.21 9.54 1.77 3.86 0.00 --- 18.18
5.70 237,818 777.70 216.29 0.82 2.24 9.72 2.08 4.52 0.00 --- 19.37
5.80 242,468 777.80 219.06 0.82 2.28 9.89 2.40 5.21 0.00 -- 20.61
5.90 247,119 777.90 222.23 0.83 2.32 10.07 2.73 5.94 0.00 - 21.89
6.00 251,769 778.00 225.93 0.83 2.35 10.24 3.08 6.70 0.00 -- 23.21
6.10 256,582 778.10 229.56 0.84 2.39 10.41 3.44 7.49 0.00 --- 24.57
6.20 261,394 778.20 233.14 0.84 2.42 10.58 3.82 8.31 0.00 --- 25.96
6.30 266,207 778.30 236.66 0.85 2.45 10.74 4.21 9.15 0.00 --- 27.40
Continues on next page...
0
0
Front Pond all Surface Page 3
Stage / Storage / Discharge Table
Stage Storage Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Discharge
ft cult ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs
6.40 271,019 778.40 240.13 0.85 2.49 10.90 4.61 10.02 0.00 --- 28.87
6.50 275,832 778.50 243.56 0.86 2.52 11.06 5.02 10.92 0.00 --- 30.38
6.60 280,644 778.60 246.93 0.86 2.55 11.22 5.44 11.84 0.00 --- 31.92
6.70 285,457 778.70 250.26 0.86 2.59 11.37 5.88 12.79 0.00 --- 33.48
6.80 290,269 778.80 253.54 0.87 2.62 11.52 6.33 13.76 0.00 --- 35.09
6.90 295,082 778.90 256.79 0.87 2.65 11.67 6.78 14.75 0.00 --- 36.73
7.00 299,894 779.00 260.00 0.87 2.68 11.82 7.25 15.77 0.00 --- 38.40
7.10 304,871 779.10 263.16 0.88 2.71 11.97 7.73 16.81 0.00 --- 40.10
7.20 309,848 779.20 266.29 0.88 2.74 12.12 8.22 17.87 0.00 --- 41.83
7.30 314,824 779.30 269.38 0.89 2.77 12.26 8.72 18.95 0.00 --- 43.59
7.40 319,801 779.40 272.43 0.89 2.80 12.40 9.22 20.06 0.00 --- 45.37
7.50 324,778 779.50 275.45 0.90 2.83 12.54 9.74 21.18 0.00 - 47.19
7.60 329,755 779.60 278.44 0.90 2.86 12.68 10.27 22.33 0.00 --- 49.03
7.70 334,732 779.70 281.40 0.91 2.89 12.82 10.80 23.49 0.00 --- 50.90
7.80 339,709 779.80 284.32 0.91 2.92 12.95 11.35 24.67 0.00 --- 52.80
7.90 344,685 779.90 287.22 0.92 2.94 13.08 11.90 25.88 0.00 -- 54.72
8.00 349,662 780.00 290.09 0.92 2.97 13.22 12.46 27.10 0.37 -- 57.05
8.10 354,792 780.10 292.93 0.93 3.00 13.35 13.03 28.34 3.37 -- 62.03
8.20 359,922 780.20 295.74 0.93 3.03 13.48 13.61 29.60 7.94 --- 68.59
8.30 365,051 780.30 298.53 0.92 3.06 13.61 14.20 30.88 13.65 --- 76.31
8.40 370,181 780.40 301.29 0.91 3.02 13.74 14.80 32.17 20.30 --- 84.94
8.50 375,311 780.50 304.02 0.91 3.01 13.80 15.40 33.49 27.77 --- 94.38
8.60 380,441 780.60 306.73 0.90 2.99 13.71 16.01 34.82 35.99 --- 104.42
8.70 385,571 780.70 309.42 0.89 2.96 13.61 16.63 36.17 44.89 -- 115.15
8.80 390,701 780.80 312.08 0.89 2.94 13.49 17.26 37.53 54.43 --- 126.53
8.90 395,830 780.90 314.72 0.87 2.89 13.26 17.89 38.91 64.55 --- 138.38
9.00 400,960 780.75 310.76 0.84 2.78 12.77 16.94 36.85 49.60 -- 119.79
End
D
10
FREELAND and KAUFFMAN,'INC.
F.nrcuv?xs • L?wvsc?+veARCtrrFC?s '
209 WsstStoneAvenue Job Job No. Date
ChwenvUls, South Carolina 29609
Telephone [phone]
F=864-23"915
Computed Dy
Checked By Date
0

L
FREELAND and KAUFFMAN, INC.
E iNEERS • L wDsc4rE ARCHITECT5
209 West Stone Avenue
Greer"le. South CaroBna 29609 Job
Telephone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Job No.
Date
Computed By
Checked By
Date
R EFERENCE alci latl n Far? _

511 L

1 ! I j i ? , I
E ' 1 I j I t

_ ? l !U ? i ? # r G; f 3

I L411 i
?
9t( I j ! ; F + j E ? ? f
]( ? ' 2 - 4. v ' ,, pis t cf. I S { ocii '

f
` 1 E E
I
? ! ' I i 1 ? I i
i j
z
'
E
3 I
? n 1
Y„?ll
j:/ L I
E

#
t

f ?
?. i i f { ? I S < ???
i
?
( ?{

I
f
i
t

t
FREELAND and KAUFFMAN, INC.
ENGINEERS - L wDsc4PEAwwrmcm
209 WestStone Avenue
Job
Greenville, South Carolina 29609
Telephone [phone]
Fax [phone]
0
0

Job No. Date
Computed By
Checked By
Date
R ?FEI?EN E Cakulatf n Fa ' i ? Dis ci U

ral
( - .,
all

Vr A-4

1 t
I
!

..._....._.3 .........,...j,..._.- ..._._ _.
.
..K_w._... ....w .....
L... .. t .. .-? .........
t ..? .. ....y....
i E ...y
?
t
I ? {
C'
?,I, EE 1
c? l I {
- I ? ;
= ? 1
-?
4
JP
5
4
5 !-4
4 i
e 0 Mr- s t

! ( € ?
_- y -T

i
H I
{

1
I 1
?;
?
I

i
1
I
s

l
1 1 I f
ell,
s
j :

t

i !

<

...............
3

........ _.... .:_..:....... ...

........
s

i
`

i
!
t f

` f

I
0

FREELAND and KAUFFMAN, INC.
&afivmw • L wDSGIPE/3R6Nrmm
209 West Stone Avenue
Greenville, South Carolina 29609
Telephone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Job Job No. Date
Computed By
Checked By Date
R FEIZ RENQEND -
E
aiculati i
on Fcir. 1 i Dis cipii 1 ?

I
i
? 11
1
I
1
i
i
!
fill
i{

AsIrl-I .0-

- 714-13 17 A 451;
• ! O ?-- { G,! ice. 1 ? { ?}?-l ? e7r? ?1••?- ?,. ? i ?: i f,? .1? -
! { #
• -

........-...

i
.._ _ i

..
s

?.':
---

to l
r

I

I

?

t! 3 s

!

{

!
1
t -- i
I 4 - 13 ? i 1 rya ?d ?' Q ; t?- l? i- 1 4 IQ 5t i
i i ??i. R ? • `?I ? ?
- ? ?- i 1 I ? i ? /.'p{ ` I j•.? 'a.?- ?y ? i i
!, ; i ? i 1 I 1

1771-

T ri-" so,
17 F
?
1 [ i i ?
? i t t I s
(j t
- - -
_ € i i t j
t !
!.j= D A te= ; I !

i ! {

1
1
=

# 4/

i
>

e
z

'
I

t
5 Iy; _ ? -
r 4
a

:
:
.
E
• _

She

ai

0
FREELAND and KAUFFMAN, INC.
EnrGwaws e L AN05GAm ARCHITECTS
209 West Stone Avenue
Greenville, South Carolina 29609
Telephone [phone]
Fax[phone]
Job Job No. Date
Computed 6y
Checked Dy Date

_
FEREN(
?E
?
alculati
n Ftir.
I {
{ Dis c(pli

u M v r E.
T• ___r •
f -
? (jam/

!

_• i L i

G.; i DE
i
{
E
-
}
j 'c 3 f t ! ? i ? ! !

144

1

Ell-
,-
VE.

;
0 FREELAND and KAUFFMAN, INC.
ENGINEERS a L4VDswEARCHITECTS
209 West Stone Avenue
GreenvOls, South CaroUm 29609
Telephone [phone]
Fax[phone]

Job Job No.
Date
Computed By
Checked By
Date
' -R -H-FEREN E alculati For. ' - I Dis cipll ?

4 L. T1

I ? k
s
1

l ?

1 1

t ! 1

- ----- - - -- ---
C -------
i
t

' t

? k a j
1 k
l
i....«.. ._._.
_., _ .._
_ ? .?1}!??.?..F_??
^Y?•
^ j ;i-Y.c-+4•? ? I ? I ? ? v s.. I ? ,1?" ?.-' ?? k t k
F
m f ? ? ?
? 1 ! ? t I ! 1 i
? G oZ _
? ? i
-IS 7. S le Nt { i t k
? I

i
I
i t
F 1
1 t
{ '{/y I,

bo 2 - ; Z G a?5 G

! ? t _..k
3 f ? k

E I

F?C
f

?- xa f

? i

i
! ?

k

. t
• T
t.:1
• 3 i ? ! k t k

t :
F ?2 t w? I

£
t
? . 2h !
£
te
FREELAND and KAUFFMAN, INC.
ENGINEERS a bwme IPEAwHrmcm
209 West Stone Avenue
Gres"vilis. South Carolina 29609 Job
Telephone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Job No. Date
Computed By
Checked Dy Date
FEIZEN E 1 Calculati n Far. Di I i

A
_1 PIC_

'n ?j

,

'' ""?" H, r ' ?a t i }

r
1 I
i i
i I
i
1
s

_ ?.

? ? + i ? t S 1 } i e
:
4

34- -T

£ i
'm. w•r.•i._r re _ /.s5a' r -:C3'I ' ../,.._t?\ / , //? ?? I - a? •
-+'???.?? .? ???•. ?S' r-? - _ rte, I, -, ? ? .? 1 I _? Li"
./j, / I '^-S I _ \ J (? , /jam i /i? • r I ? R F . ?.+? ? !. ?.. •; r ?`-=1 _. .
-' i .. ?. t ' °'-• ??' / ?? JAI ?\.,,rl ll. 7'?_, _.r.., ? .; .u/ \ / ? -. ? 5?, r
t \\?\ ??' '4•r ?s--P rte.- ? t?? -?,j ? r ., _r I'???.,? o ?'/ _ ? ?"-' 1• ? ?
7 7-
-:?V ????^ rl???? :I I,? 1' if - ? `I,?Z?}'1` .• ?„??? .-?i?.n?? ?t ! ??.. J _?;.. ? ,? _//.•%fl'Yb .
Z ?,' N\ ('J? ?f/?.. 1? '`?. ti,,7(s 4 F{. N f F. 6 .,`• ?' r ?.a`¢.?•>, •? li - '?? i?
r ^ .mom + ? %??' r? ? '7'• ?-'-'?._, I - ??- ?') '?-,r / ?'a"-y"--'?',? AA?
J' 1?1 \\-? -? I• '-?/J?- _
Wool?
yay., // ^?? =? I IE'? ? _ ?? ? \M?,(?•?-/ ?'? '?\? W 'A ?_,cl?'y??-?? `.?1/ E?i,,'?(. 1/,
Ple
,-40
r ? ^':.: /'' •?`? I ? i? \\ \, ?'? ?; ??/J/ t _ • ?i
It 1 7:7.
.? ,? ?`?` \ ••k `? a •?iESti ..1 {J I. O ???`??t??` . i'\ !??? ; : I `/??`•-f"a ?\ \?: \ '' t " ?'J
X'I
""7 `? I' • ? LL / =. '/tee 1 \n ` ?5-?.-_?\Y/
?'.• ? ? \I.j. _-? ? . \?' ???. ."' 1 - .? ? l•..?i ?? •_ : r: /? __`__ ?"^?i ?•, 4•.-.. i `fie ? ? ? `'; ? ? ?'?1-??.
? ????` `},?? ? : -N - 1 ,•,r . t\: -??::. i ^ •??\ • `-r+? .? b.?aC /--Jr' _ ' d •itj"?) S ?? ?'?? ti 1 ?. ??? '
171,
y1f
a ? % ??•; . i \?. l-. ?- `. ?? I '+?Y? ( \m' ?1 i'l%?. ?? ??° ?r\ ? t Itr ?. ? ??. j ? j lily ? .
??. ?} / ! i`_.. ";'d ?o , j I ? /ice t!? •./y ? ?.G'-?! t.J t?. /`.1. ? ??
17
"?i `, ` ??? ?? ;;\.l' '-.i ??I`??`?I`?7'...?t ? I lil :rl' ; ? n ? - - •?'. j ?`?`7// .(,ti / ,r °',;:
'All
?;?--? o`I I)II. ??? -? / / •, - ??\? ? 1 :??' 1. ? i ?, +'? ? - ?\ ) ?~ ?' ? : ?? ? . t. ?'<?? \.?
v•? ? `/ ? ` -?? ?/ ry.' r• 7'+'../ ? ? ! 1 ??'V?' \• ??,(? "` "'`
aa?\ ??77°.,. ^7 ??/ ,•!/; j ?!0. /• ?r-??• ?I'?/•?. I ? I?\1?,,.ir? ? f•• c?0;.i (?I• .,yam
,/? ?),?..y `•„. 1 ? ,/-1??•.?.?...? ?\\ , ?;j ?
!/ _ ?? n. •M .,? /?,? Off'' nom.;. '???I n r i ? ' cam/ v ?.?
FREELAND and KAUFFMAN, INC.
ENGINEERS • L 4wsc,4nARCHflECTS
209 West Stone Avenue
Greenville, South Carolina 29609 Job
Telephone [phone]
Fax [phone]

101
Job No. Date
Computed By
Checked By
Date
R?FERENCi E i calcufatl ?n Fdr
? i ! i Dis iplf i
. .

?
?` ;
rte-
i
I
rz?
i -_?--?---?-^ ? ---1------•
?---?--_-
?
?,

d4 4 i % ?a " _? / iC t? ._ i 1 `? i L « w j r" I\l b a: t
<

.
: i i

t
< •

It
•
?
? $ ? i i i
L-sa

Is,

E Fii
i i;t
- ?
i i
F f i t t € i ? i f ? [
•
S
_
11 ??? i

7 `
jj

,

i

f

< no s

I
f

i
.
}
i

4 r i f ; i

I G €

cam
.
All
All
_ .......

t I
FREELAND and KAUFFMAN, INC.
ENGINEERS • L wasc nARCHIrEms
209 West Stone Avenue
Greenville. South Carolina 29609 Job
Telephone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Job No.
Computed By
Checked Dy Date
Date
-REFERENCE - Calc ilatimn Far. n inli _
_.L_ I _ L _ _#

-
- _ _.I ._ ___._ ?....... . _?.. o .-°- .._.? - ? G "` t`:_s :__.=?:? ?•.-?_?_-?.__..Ir..<
11
< ?'?`?S
4- ..._. i ? S ..a?`?`?_-.:_._.._ ll,?%T! ? ? _ ? G'? ...._...?:??.ir._ __ _.:..,_
dr i i

<

£
i

i
,

+7 i

!

?
0
f S t_ icrj v I r^S,i i
$
--T P
77 ?
r-
jam. ;.<
.- I
1
,
___.
-•

G AC ' G t £_ lye q t
?i
3 € ? ??^T I f ? r
? E i £
Z, IL
`
;
`
.
{
l '
f .d ?.-.L ? it
3,- l/L' ?F. t€
±GS',.... t l'?1 /+?,.
-..G?l_?.:.: ?
• T?-?»-? /
7 1 ` ?
1/ ? •
Y?'3 `?' i

... .:: _ ... ____ ?_._........... .. .__f__....___ i ., _. f..._..
f

:
a
, ? 1 £

x I

:
I
€ ¢ ? ? 5hee
jj F
t Of i
i +_-
0 FREELAND and KAUFFMAN, INC.
&amEw • bwsc4mARcHrmcrs
209 West Stone Avenue
Greenville, South Carolina 29609 Job
Telephone [phone]
Fax [phone]
6

Job No. Date
Computed By
Checked By
Date
REFERENCE iCalc elatio n Far 7G, I.1 I? t : i LI

-- ------- ---
_. _41_l
t --
i

- - --- --------

?i

+ 4-vli! a x,
-. .i L`•.:•' ELL ' .. ..j...1. 6. ?.1"? ._.' I. .
` " .._... ...... _• i•........ f .... --..--

:

I
i

I s
=tom -
.

s
` .
e G• Z 'Y f ? { I 1 I
i .,,,,..,.? . .....1.1.10

_ ....-. ..._...._.. _... {.-.•.•+_+t+. ? " '_•" t"...'..K.`."_` ; .'ice'
j i
_-_6_.._?._..WFC-..... ?: r
I,{ I
3..__...-ar.?...Y.
( .........S.rj..........., n'. ",y I .:.. ?
?. i ' !
- I ` :
I I ^•r'_ j ?- /7
s ....
.....
_ J7,
t1
it

` t t I t %

<

`

I

i !
1

I

}

<
<

,

x

?

I

_

?- i I t
I I _ I ^ ^ ? ?
? s 1
:
"

'
% S i
e

3

I

!
i

<

•
b FREELAND and KAUFFMAN, INC.
ENaiNEERS • LANDSCawEARCH/ wrs
209 West Stone Avenue Job
Greenville, South Carolina 29609
Telephone [phone]
Fax [phone]
D

0
Job No.
Date
Computed By
Checked By
Date
REFERENC E Calculation For. D&Ipli '

1
:r.j?- I
I f

:
?.

J
i i f ? ? ? € k 3 1
,
`7 t?Da 22
,
s
t
7.
((
f

41-1
:

I

f

;

€

i :
F

i
,
,
G.

y?•-•

i

)

Ij
r
-E

i E

t
I '. I p1 - i ??I = ,
.
t t
€
4
? ? ?
i t?

e
III

.
{
_
i
i

I

E
..__ ?
? _ 7411
4

I r I

i

t I

i i ? ? € 3
f
,
f i
4 t
t
?
:
_ _._......_-.. . ._ ........_.__..._.... ...._.......-
FREELAND and KAUFFMAN, INC.
ENGINEERS • LANDSCAPE ARCHI7PCT5
209 West Stone Avenue
Greenville, South Carolina 29609 Job Job No.
Telephone [phone] Computed By
Fax [phone]
Date
Checked by Date
REFERENQ E Calculati®n Far
.

T , LI e?"•.? 1.+. ii?r?. tr??, 1 .i. ^? ? { I ? <: ? ? 1 j }

_-.T.____...._i-___._ .« ......._?... ?-. '?-.-?._......?.?.. Q.,? ?. ._?Vc:.£; L --..? ?-•1-af -----??..s?+ aw..-_..r ? .?".?-.??s?iu, .... ? .i/ _.........? ......._ F i

- •• i{'_?l r__T..-..^ } . t 4 i 'w.;-_ i.. -€ ,?,. 'rj, (?! , :A, ?? . • ?} '.o ??i

F . ?iw..
? -
-*-•
--_{.._._...._. ?....... --N ? ate'./ _?_
. ? _ _ _ t )
_ _ f I '?..--.?-.? ?_...?
.
! .
:O
S`
'i {
j
r
,
?1 -

I ' '> I
? 1 ? i ^
? S { j 3
l j i ? j? E

1
1

i _ E t f

. }

i

I

i

F

€

,

'

f

€
t 3
h
b
0
0

FREELAND and KAUFFMAN, INC.
ENGINEERS -L wDsc4EARCH/TECTS
209 West Stone Avenue Job
Greamrille, South Carolina 29609
Telephone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Job No.
Computed By
Checked By Date
Date
REFERENC E Calculation For. Discipli

<
< i
?1
x
_?-

-!- c4rn ;-71 r- I

:
I

__ `' T f _ GJ+ /-N i
t
-,
i-

j i 4 < t

i t
<
i

:
i

5 {

i
4 w..l i _..
< _ ..... _ ._........?.._..__.

F s ? ?• ? F ? t t
4

e 6
?
Z ,
4

I
N

---
k

_
4aTI

t

Q
,i< ?_9?

q
4
j F
1 3333 i

T€ ---- - ------
?
F ------

I
i
I
I
i

<
1
{
f
I
r

•
4
<
< 1
a FREELAND and KAUFFMAN, INC.
ENGINEERS - LANDSCMEARCHIMCTS
209 West Stone Avenue Job
Greenville, South Carolina 29609
Telephone [phone]
Fax [phone]
a
0
10
Job No. Date
Computed By
Checked By
Date
R EFEREN E ICalculati n Far. 4 1 '•" ? ' ?? -f ! ! 11 scipii ft

Ito,

• 3 `
IT.
Z-A

' ; <
i
A
3

sD • i

5 °

C',2

1

r'"

. - - -------- ---
g
1
S

<
.

h

?
Of
3 5LSC
FREELAND and KAUFFMAN, INC.
ENwNEEw • LmDSC4PEAwHrmcr9
209 West Stone Avenue
Greenville, South Carolina 29609 Job Job No. Date
Telephone [phone] Computed By
Fax [phone]
Checked By Date

10
REFERENCE Ca?ulation For !
IL

( i

? ? Discipline: {

r

L __.--___
E-
12-
;........-_ i .. __.._ __.. .__

r
?
i'! 21 2-1-
__ -

}

.
- ice' ?`
i'" --•
h--4 -'....?__..?
+._ i .,{*;'G".
;
I
._.
I S,?L / ,lam h
! J « 1
? - - _ ' __.
.
? I
I
l 1 ? Sy.--:?. `7's ? i V i "• C/ I `?ir W„ i ?f^'

« ' `'•'? '"i-_..... ?" M ?1 ! /r emu' s `wa"r '? y .? ~ ! ' G . I i
_ . _.; __. _. L..e "? , t-. _ r __,{-??_...? ? ? _. fir-' --?-j --. _.-•i_,..:. -?" ?--•-•IY---- { i _" _-

......s........._T-_._.
y......__ t
?_ -'? [isu-__:..IG.........}.-... c Cs'
_
i
.....,.t
?..„. 5
' I
7, 7_..._».

? 7 f i„ ? 1 I { { { {
33 i i
r
1-> I

.

111 ?
3
'
-
I , {

j

i

I

{
i
t i

{

t

I f

{

i

a

w
w
FREELAND and KAUFFMAN, INC.
&s1NEERS - L4NOSC4PE ARCHITECTS
209 West Stone Avenue Job
Greenville, South Carolina 29609
Telephone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Job No. Date
Computed By
Checked By
Date
REFEREN E alculati ®n Far. !?? ! ! ;~ ! ! Di ipii !

1 i ? ? ? =tea ?` ?...
?= r?.li ? ?.G? ? • -` , r-L o i
___. ..
_._ •. _
# r
,

14

'.__._# .._.._..».._-_•.
, __.-..•-_ .-.-
? --""I^'9'Y_.:
?
' '? I ..?..--.-.- -.r..... _.-._ j°`.t&!._..
ti• r ?
# ' IA'^ 4i
? i
'?
1 Jl.-:•?--w
Mi - -J4el
i t ...f1?: '1 w. r f
(---•?''? ?` ? F ? ..
? 1 ' - - --,?
1 i -i.?C'-.{^=•
'' r
. » .
-.
....).__
:=
4?r
47

._. .... .. •.... '?-w:i.?11 _......j?-'1?'-J.y,--' -..-•F-•- /` ,w ti".r R'I . !.?,?,.#i f"' + I i ' i I # }

€
t t
" f j ( 7

i ?- n
€ F
j #
$
.`, ..._..-...... ............. ..
«.__-...•
L... .......
L ...__.?._-. J-. .•
.-•__.-
..._ -.....^?
_._..
....•.-.r. ..----•...i-•----
.
am.-t-_.__
?
._+

1
, #
# ? + f
f

r
t

,
f(

.
+

?

#
e

£
FREELAND and KAUFFMAN, INC.
ENGINEERS • LANDsawEARCH/1ECTS
209 West Storm Avenue Job
Greenville, South Carolina 29609
Telephone [phone]
Fax [phone]
r

Job No. Date
Computed By
Checked By
Date
R?FERE CN E ? Calculati
' n Far. I
c j Distipil !

- + rte'- !f
4 C
- zdl - __ ? C-F

?. -L2... fill
_

:

i
;

.

t
s

z

---..--
i
I

,-....?

.

1

'
i
7

...-.•''' t --i- ?`?= i? I ?7, 1-"' ?i va ^ I ! ? p ? ,?r ? ? ' ."r^.? 3 L 1 . ='f? ?G' t i

i i
€

lip,

.. €

i?

?!7 S

• it
:
:
t [

?

#

3

?

j

E

?

'

€
t
and
E
i
#
?r
'
_
f
I 4s
i
L.....-.:•-..-._..,i
i
_-__i
__
A I i I!{ J /? j I G

!! i ? #
3 ? ? # i 4 1 I j i
4 €

r F } t

' h
?YSG

?
Y
Of
p FREELAND and KAUFFMAN, INC.
ENGINEERS •Lmrisa PEARCHrmcm
209 WeatStone Avenue
Job Job NO.
Greenville, South Carolina 29609
Telephone [phone] Computed By
Fax [phone]
Date
Checked By Date

REFERENCE iCalculati bn Fcjr ? ? ! i { f 4 ! !
! Di50
iplin?e
f
'

s

i
. ,

i

i
i
( 1
,

: ;

E
i

i
i

i
i
f 1

g 4

!

< 7j

-

TT

.
<
f

_ i

1
???

r
5

?
?
i

?? ?

i-?;. .. ..

Y'
.

t i

?.<.. i

i O
'

?
__.........
-
,
----
•-
__
_......
.
j
L!.
_ ? ?s?,? ' ??? ? - 2= ?"_:.,. ? u gym-- ?? ? ? ?? •- ?'' ? -

:
_.??-?_?...'. ?.
^"-e'f...r
s?

_

4

i
_LK
.?! 3
pf - j

:
FREELAND and KAUFFMAN, INC.
• F-wavEERs sLmosavEAwHimcm
209 WestStone Avenue Job wx 0 5 - ? Job No. Date 7 l I o?
Oreenvilis, South Carolina 29609
Telephone W4-233-5497 Computed By
Rix 864-233-8915
Checked By Dale

0
FEI EN E ?aiculati For ? - ' ? c?-1 "r r 1 ! DISCIPlf !
.

? ? 0 1 S n r+r za3 _ l r i i

t I E ,

f ( 4?-a 10 dLc- ?h
,
i

' A
C o
z-
-?t't,
'
I
i
E
7'

( I
S i ! ?
TT
< i t
i
k ; _ ` =a d?0 2lA I

/SE _? I i i € [ E

i ! } i E
_
t ! f 1? i i t
?

?
f
i t ? ? t
I

e '

tt
i

i
! 1
{
=
i
t
FREELANO and KAUFFMAN, INC.
??? • c.?wvsc.+rE A??
209 west Stone Avenue
Greenville, South Carolina 29609 Job Job No. Date o
Telsphone864-233-5497 Computed By Rn
Fax [phone]
Checked By Date
10
0
FEKEN E alcWitlb n Far E ? ?- R ?.- tL ' D( Ili
.
?
x Pte ` v t o FT' 3 i 1 S Ac -? P. 3
t

OLL
-4- 5
?
rL
14 ?1 au: Z
?Fs
-

- --- -------- -------

i k i
??
???p
E
'
F
i t
€ ' ! !!
3 i r j i
.. '

!

? _... -
.
!

O
1 I
? 110-0 -

1
P40 i 7 0 1 £
t £ ? i ? t E
---- - ------- -----------
?
?
i
f E ? I E s E
4 E '
,L < <

C } E ? ?

h I
0
FREELAND and KAUFFMAN, INC.
&aaymw • GWDSCAf'EARCH/mcrs -
209 WeetStonsAvenus
job J
GnQm (cn
rvNls South Carolina 29609 '3iOr Q Job No. Date (5
Tslephons864233-5497 Computed By ?N'?>
Fear 864-233-8915
Checked Dy Date
L

FEIZEN E Calculati on Far. i Di ipi(n v.
i

..
7
a?
c.. -7 7

7-1 -2
i
t1
1-
E
4z
Q V

j i ? s ! 1 i { I
77
--

-?'
-
CV, 1 2-
I

i

1

T

i
U L X
i r--R- A-

-
-
V 171

' E
!
?
i
1
?
f
F ! 4 ? f 1 4
i

F i
e ! E i

`

t
E t
. j
<
: E
i
F

e
:

^ <
f, f t ` ! j f
E _

:
C

i

c
-

:
I
E EEE
h s
v
a

FREELAND and KAUFFMAN, INC.

209 W"%,StonaAv=w
GraemMe. South CaroUm 29609
Telephone [phone]
Fax [phone]
Job Wif-15TD"Job No. Date -7/ 5 (?
Computed By T!T's
Checked By
Daze
R FE12EN E ?aIculati n Far. r-+ t ? ?E, I t? l 1 ? Distipl( _
I i i ? s 3

Te F!a c. `

t ? S
! \ t

r_._
_ __
_.
_
__ _ 4?_
b.o ?.
4_? L
_ 4-)l
._
. _._. ___ _.
.._._..•.....
___... f
__ ___.
___..
-. .-
-_-- ._
-

-6 P,

t i f i ? ? I f ? ? ' ?
;` I i S Q- o s F v oa
^_
i S ? ? f 3 j

+
F
i
i

i

i

;

I
€
i - ---------
----- -----
s-
€
p '
l f f

.. I I EE i
C E1?i s T 7Z ?P'TN S
€ F

- -------- ---

,
<
I
i
? f j i f t [
1 ? 3
i E ?

FREELAND and KAUFFMAN, INC.
c/NEERS • LANDsa4m Amawmcm -
209 W"tStonaAvsnus
Greenville. South Carolhu 29609 Job f .1?? os - Job No. Date 7l 00
Telephone[phone] Computed By T?>-r5
Fax [phone]
Checked By Date
FEK, EN E Fo
k
ul
Vb M '
Z ! DisCipli
n
r.
;
a _

j '? ? E- U 1 f Z

'

r

r.._..._
....._....
1............
_ ...._
...-_.}
_..?__?
._. _.v_......a ?
_.__.p._..... i
..........w......._
...........f.........
.......}.....-.....
{ of G EFL'

i t 1i j( ? ? E 1

* 1
?
j ! j

:
E
?v e

! 1 l ? ? i f '
? I ( €
E
E M t

i.. 1

( j h 1
0
a
Re: Isakson-barnhart, 99 1172, Forsyth Co.
Subject: Re: Isakson-barnhart, 991172, Forsyth Co.
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2000 08:23:33 -0400
From: John Dorney <[e-mail]>
To: Jennifer Frye <[e-mail]>
CC: Cyndi Bell <[e-mail]>
cyndi and i talked yesterday.. she will get up with ewe. thankx
p.s. jennifer - steve kroeger will be sending an announcement real soon re
wetland delineation classes this summer. you may want to go to one if your
schedule allows.
Jennifer Frye wrote:
> Just wondering if you two have had a chance to talk about this one at
> all. Mainly, because Mr. Helpful Consultant (Chuck Roadley) is driving
> me nuts.
> My two questions/concerns are this
> 1. Since this is an IP, can we push the avoidance/minimization issue?
> John, in case you haven't seen this yet, their AIM is to pipe the whole
> damn thing. Two things actually, one perennial, one intermittent.
> 2. Do we have to look at this project from the standpoint of what they
> want to do with the property (one major retail store w/ multiple
> outbuildings) or can we look at it from the development potential of the
> property (suitable for smaller and fewer retail stores)? The reason
> that I ask this is that the applicant is a major retail chain (Cosco, I
> think) and not yet the property owner (they have an option and are
> currently going through the zoning process) and I ASSUME that they will
> want to build one of their own stores, hence their "need" for the one
> big store w/ multiple outbuildings.
> Thanks,
> Jennifer
,? eta ?G? rto/ ?l?f
1 of 1 6/6/00 1:39 PN
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
1••
NCDENR
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
June 5, 2000
Forsyth County
DWQ Project No. 991172
Donald Garner
Isakson-Barnhart
25 Technology Parkway South, Suite 201
Norcross, Georgia, 30092
Dear Mr. Garner:
Reference is made to your application for a 401 Water Quality Certification to impact 867 linear feet of
streams and 0.32 acre of wetlands for a commercial retail center in Forsyth County. Since you propose to
impact greater than 150 linear feet of perennial streams, compensatory stream mitigation will be required in
accordance with 15A NCAC 2H.0506(h). You have the following options for satisfying the mitigation
requirement associated with this project:
1. Payment into the North Carolina Wetland Restoration Program, if the WRP will accept the
responsibility for conducting this mitigation work, or
2. Preparing and implementing a stream mitigation plan.
In your original application, you proposed using the WRP for stream mitigation. Please contact Mr. Ron
Ferrell, supervisor of the Wetland Restoration Program, at 919-733-5208. We must receive written
concurrence from the WRP that they are prepared to locate and implement a stream mitigation site for your
project. If you decide to develop a stream mitigation site at another location, your application will be
considered incomplete until a mitigation plan is forwarded to this office.
Also, please provide details for the stormwater pond referenced in your application. It will be helpful to
review the calculations used to determine the size of the pond so that we can conclude whether or not it will be
adequate.
Until this information is received, I will request (by copy of this letter) that the Corps of Engineers place
this project on hold. Also, this project will be placed on hold for our processing due to incomplete
information (15A NCAC 2H.0507(h)). I can be reached at [phone].
'ncerely,
o mey
991172
cc: Corps of Engineers Raleigh Field Office
Winston-Salem DWQ Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Chuck Roadley, 3000 Easter Circle, Williamsburg, VA, 23188
Division of Water Quality • Non-Discharge Branch
401/Wetlands Unit, 1621 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer • 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
MEMO
TO: /
oar-, )o'?
DATE: ? (416
SUBJECT:
6t, 10-6.k 4571 -/_4

--TG?

Ck
6 Iz/oJ

.I? &2,
From:
North Carolina Department of Environment,
=r ?g Health, and Natural Resources e,
Printed on Recycled Paper
V V ILLIAMSBURG
NVIRONMENTAL
"N ROUP, INC.
Environmental Consultants
April 13, 2000
Mr. S. Kenneth Jolly
US Army Corps of Engineers
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615 APR
Re: Winston-Salem Site, ID 200020130
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Applicant: Mr. Donald W. Garner
Isakson-Barnhart
25 Technology Parkway South, Suite 201
Norcross, Georgia 30092
c000
On behalf of our client, Williamsburg Environmental Group, Inc. (WEG) is pleased to provide
the following additional information, as you requested in your letter of March 13, 2000.. The
enclosed material presents an overview of the alternatives considered for this project and
highlights the efforts taken to minimize impacts to waters and wetlands within the proposed
development. Isakson-Barnhart, the applicant for the 35-acre Winston-Salem Site, is proposing
a commercial retail center involving the construction of road infrastructure, utility line
installation, and commercial retail development. The purpose of the project is to create a quality
retail shopping complex that satisfies the market sector demands of the retail merchants.
proposing to utilize this facility.
Prior to focusing their effort within the proposed 35-acre site, the project proponents evaluated
two additional sites within the service area surrounding Hanes Mall (Figure 1). Available sites
located out of this service area were considered and rejected early in the process since they were
too far from the Hanes Mall area to support the commercial aspect of this project. The major
retail tenants, such as the ones wanting to use this development, require that the site be located
within the immediate shopping area of a regional commerce center. They require the project to
be located on a major roadway and at a major intersection with traffic control. In addition, the
specific requirements. of the proposed tenants dictate that the development contain other national
tenants to provide the synergy and customer volume necessary to support this commercial
venture.
There is only one other tract of land in the Hanes Mall area large enough for this type of
development. The property is located on Hanes Mall Boulevard adjacent to Interstate 40.
Although the property occupies 53 acres, it is not located at a major intersection with traffic
control and it has limited buildable area due to a sewer easement that bisects the property at an
angle. This would greatly reduce the number of large tenant stores that could locate on the
property without which there would not be enough income producing area to provide for an
economically successful development. The core anchor for the proposed development has
confirmed they would not locate in this location. This site also contains environmental
3000 Easter Circle Williamsburg, Virginia 23188 [phone] FAX [phone]
Mr. S. Kenneth Jolly
April 13, 2000
Page 2
constraints similar to if not greater than those found on the proposed site. The property is
bisected by a downstream segment of the same waterway found on the current site and due to its
location on the property would require greater impacts to jurisdictional resources should the site
be developed under the proposed use. The site is also significantly below the roadway elevation.
It would not be economically feasible to raise the building grades to the road elevation. As such,
this alternative would leave the buildings in a hole, which is unacceptable. As a result of a,
combination of these factors, this site was rejected from further consideration.
There is a second property located on Hanes Mall Boulevard that was considered and rejected.
This 22-acre parcel is located across from the 53-acre tract and is currently not for sale. The.
property is also critically constrained by the Duke Power high voltage transmission lines. Such a
constraint restricts the actual buildable. area on the property rendering it too small for the
proposed development. No other properties-were found in this area which meet the requirements
of the proposed tenants.
Once a decision was made to focus on the proposed location, a considerable effort was made to
arrive at commercial layout that avoids and minimizes impacts to jurisdictional resources to the
greatest extent practicable. Several alternative layouts were examined in an effort to reduce
impacts. A representative composite of these alternatives was presented as Alternative #1 in the
application document. However, numerous iterations of similar layouts were considered in an
effort to decrease the footprint within the resource areas. All of these alternatives sought to
minimize impacts with particular attention paid to the stream section designated as Area II on.the
project drawings. These alternatives (A through C) were developed to examine the practicability
of alternative development configurations given other site constraints, zoning requirements,
tenant needs, and the economic requirements of the investors.
Alternative A eliminates the majority of the commercial area along Hanes Mall Boulevard. This
layout is contrary to the requirement of the neighborhood association that adjoins this project to
the rear and the City of Winston-Salem. It violates the concept of staging development as one
moves away from the roadway such that the large anchor stores do not dominate the landscape in
the immediate vicinity of the roadway. The small retail stores need to be located along Hanes
Mall Boulevard while the larger box stores are located to the rear of the development. This
alternative also does not meet the parking requirement of the City of Winston-Salem and the
retail tenants, which require a certain number of parking spaces before agreeing to locate in a
development. This plan has only 1024 parking spaces while the requirement is 1429 spaces.
There is not enough room to provide more parking without further impacting jurisdictional
resources. This alternative also contains a major flaw in that the applicant cannot locate smaller
retail development under the Duke Power high voltage lines. The equity partners and the lender
require a certain return on their investment. The elimination of small retail stores would bring
the return below acceptable levels.
Alternative B sought to investigate the impact of removing the retail area from under the power
lines while still minimizing impacts to jurisdictional areas. However, many of the same
constraints that plagued the previous alternative remain under this scenario. The parking
requirement has not been met, the commercial area has been reduced further impacting the return

Mr. S. Kenneth Jolly
April 13, 2000
Page 3
on investment, and the service center associated with the major tenant has been eliminated. The
elimination of this facility is not acceptable to them since it represents a significant component of
their overall business plan. The parking requirement for this alternative is .1413 spaces and only
1151 can be provided. In addition, all of the retail stores going into this development require
storefront parking. There is not enough room available in front of the stores to provide this
required area. In order to satisfy this requirement, the detention pond would have to be relocated
within the same creek we sought to avoid.
Alternative C was developed to examine. the practicality of. expanding the retail component
outside of jurisdictional areas in an effort to satisfy the economic constraints of the investors and
site configuration requirements imposed by the tenants. While this configuration does replace
the service center in the northern portion of the project, the overall retail area is decreased. The
parking, requirement of 1308 spaces for this layout is not met and the direct access to the rear of
the development has been removed. This rear access is a requirement of the neighborhood
association, the City of Winston-Salem, and the property owner to keep this area from being
landlocked. The landowner cannot provide internal access to the rear parcel through an existing
residential road network. This parcel needs to have direct access off of Hanes Mall Boulevard
through the proposed development. In addition, the location of small retail stores at a 90-degree
angle to Hanes Mall Boulevard is unacceptable. Small. retailers such as these require visibility
for their economic. success. This location would greatly reduce such visibility due the grade
differences and the linear distance from the roadway.
In summary, the applicant has investigated both offsite locations and onsite development
configurations in an effort to reduce impacts to jurisdictional resources. However, given the site
constraints, economic constraints, tenant needs and local requirements, it is our opinion that the
selection and development of this property represents the most viable and least environmentally
damaging practicable alternative for this project.
In your letter you also requested that the applicant include a mitigation proposal to offset the
unavoidable impacts to jurisdictional waters and wetlands. The original permit support
document submitted last fall proposed to mitigate for the unavoidable impacts to 867 linear feet
of stream channel (Area II), 0.32 acres of nontidal forested-headwater wetlands and 0.07 acres of
other waters of the U.S. (Area 1). The applicant investigated various compensation options
including onsite creation, offsite creation, and offsite preservation of significant or sensitive
aquatic/wetland environments. The 0.07 acres of waters impacted in Area I should be adequately
compensated thought the creation 40,538 S.F. of ponded surface area within the proposed BMP.
A 10-foot vegetated wetland bench is also proposed within this BMP. Onsite creation of
wetlands, however, is not feasible due to the limited project size and severe topography. A
wetland creation ratio of 2:1 would require the excavation and planting of approximately 0.64
acres of forested wetlands and the creation of 867 linear feet of stream channel. This project site
will not support any kind of commercial development and such a mitigation compensation site.
A review of adjacent properties revealed that most uplands are either developed or are in the
process of developing. In addition, no disturbed offsite areas in the vicinity were determined to
be suitable for wetland restoration or creation. As such, the applicant proposes to make a

Mr. S. Kenneth Jolly
April 13, 2000
Page 4
contribution to the Wetlands Restoration Program (WRP) in the amount of $123,735.00 (867 l.f
x $125.00 + 0.64 acres x $24,000), subject to Corps and NCDENR approval.
On behalf of our client, the Williamsburg Environmental Group, Inc. respectfully requests that
the Corps proceed with the processing of this permit. I have also included a copy of the pipeline
routing plan as requested by Mr. John Thomas. If you have any questions, please feel free to call
me at your convenience. Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
SSiinncerely,1
Charles R. Roadley, Jr.
Regulatory Specialist/Project Manager
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Donald W. Garner, Isakson-Barnhart -
Mr. John Thomas, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Raleigh
Ms. Jennifer Frye, NCDENR, Winston-Salem
Environmental Consultants
TRANSMITTAL LETTER
TO
Ms. Cyndi Bell,
NCDENR
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607
J
DATE
April 26, 2000
RE
Winston Salem Site
991172,
Additional Information
WE ARE SENDING ATTACHED D UNDER SEPARATE COVER VIA
= Plans D 'Contracts D Letters
0 Prints Literature D Other:
l• Copies D Samples
COPIES: ;DATED DESCRIPTION
1 , 4/13/2000 Letter to Kenneth Joll
I N/A figure 1 - Alternative Sites
L N/A Figures A-C, Alternative Development Plans

THESE ARE BEING SENT;
As per your request = For your comments = For your signature
= For your review = For your use/files = For your
NOTES Ms. Bell:
Jennifer Frye requested that I forward the enclosed material to you attention.
Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.
ATU
COPY TO SIGN
Mr. Don Garner, Isakson-Barnhart
L
Chuck Roadley, Reg. Spec. roject Manager
3000 Easter Circle Williamsburg, Virginia 23188' [phone] FAX [phone]

r-

APR 2 7
i
WETLANDS GMO L
C?UALITY q?0.

M E'
:.. I J'
i 6 LRAI

mill
?g
H
W ?
w
? o
W w ?
?4 H
x
z
W ? v
E- x
z a
FT. CD
o
0
m
H
a o
? z
A ? ?

ease-= (494 99M -all I-Wm9M 'M -M aaoe
VMnOava fUZION ',UNnOD HUSZ10A
RES ITS-NOZSNLW
SUIS HIIIZM911V I Mfl-DId
awOS OZ ,COAT :awOS
TV6 QMEWIN 9Or
oooz `ET IIziciv :alv(l
. r °Jldf4.?
t??? `ice
I
• 1aa ? ti
}
A
'? a nat?! ?? ?•?? ?' ? ??
} . ? '.? , „ter

f s. ? r
x7

6 1 -

4 .

nr i s.-

? xl M;lili! ?Y ';" f

• 1 .
¢! r

r,

iF
• L.?• T+

C\
! W"
.

cv zQ+
_-
Ci
i? FNII ?
jq:
R
a
a
?E

•A/IG?1.
er•d••ior• ? -,-
t
s. "
!
?r p a . •Y
wl• ? •r
mac.. ? ` •
4 v IL
1
?, 1 K
A• Y ?•
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact:
Non-Discharge Branch WO Supervisor:
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name lsakson-Barnhard
Project Number 99 1172
Recvd From APP
Received Date 10/20/99 Recvd By Region 10/26/99
Project Type Commercial
County Forsyth
County2
Region Winston-Salem
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet EM
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
rF-,P-F-P'!7 @)N __ 12-94-11 rC -- 30,704. 0.25 F1,551.31) 867.00 684.39
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
WRP F_ F- 867.00
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y 0 N Did you request more info? 0 Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? QQ Y 0 N
Recommendation: 0 issue QQ Issue/fond 0 Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 360315011 Longitude (ddmmss) 80° 19' 00"
Comments:
ON Ho l n I ETTER SENT BY REGION ON 11/4/99 for the following reasons-
1 Pro opacts gr at r than 500 LF, need to re-any for IP_
? Did not include all im acp is to jurisdictional waters. (only the mitigatable waters)
3 Used square footage instead of linear footage fgr intermittent channel.
4 Did not include a delineated wetland with total acreage to be impacted.
Did not sufficiently provide documentation that they Myestigated the possihili y of off-site
mitigation
cc: Regional Office Page Number 1
Central Office
Facility Name Isakson-Bernhard County Fors th
.7
Project Number 99 1172 Regional Contact: Jennifer Frye
\ Date: 2/1/2000
Comments (contin
They submitted the ted on January 31, 2000.
1. They have applied a
2. They have stated th`.-mey have accounted for all wetlands to be impacted. However, still the
position of this Office that a small area (<1 acre) of wetlands exists at the Lowe's propey boundary in
Area 11.

3. In order to pay int o the WRP, they need to contact Ron Ferrell to make certain that WRP will
aQ!?42 their mitigatio n payment.

4. The WSRO recom mends that the WO certification be issued for the im an cts proposed on
their AVOIDANCE P LAN. This plan minimizes the impacts to the permanent channel to 160 LF for a
Load crossing. Moreo ver, if they were able to decrease that impact to less that 150 LF (remove the
traffic islands at that they would not be required to mitigate- (The project immediately
point)
downstream (M'chael ,
-Neill proper has minimized their impacts to less than 150 LF for a road
r.rn.. _GSina.----- so it is po ssible..... even with frontage propeU-)

It is known that the pr operties along Hanes Mall Boulevard are rapidly eveloping for commercial use
and that DWO will se e future prQ.ects downstream of this property. It is the belief of this Office that
the waters in this are a are degrading. However, this SHOULD NOT be used as justification by the
developers to culvert as these projects that may be causing the degradation, 15A
drain
and fill
,
I NCAC 2H _0506(h)_ ,
,
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 2
[Fwd: Isakson-Barnhart 99 1172]
Subject: [Fwd: Isakson-Barnhart 991172]
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 10:57:27 -0400
From: Jennifer Frye <[e-mail]>
Organization: NC DENR Water Quality
To: Cyndi Bell <[e-mail]>
Cyndi,
The info. that I have requested that they send to you is their response
to the Corps need for more information. I just thought that you would
like to have a copy for your files.
have a great day,
Jen
Subject: RE: Isakson-Barnhart 991172
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2000 09:46:56 -0400
From: Chuck Roadley <[e-mail]>
Organization: Williamsburg Environmental Group
To: 'Jennifer Frye' <[e-mail]>
Thanks Jen:
Sorry I couldn't get back to you sooner. I'll get that in today's mail.
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: Jennifer Frye [SMTP:[e-mail]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2000 9:31 AM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Isakson-Barnhart 99 1172
Hello Chuck,
I received the copy of your April 13, 2000 package to the Corps. If
possible, could you send a copy to our 401/Wetlands Unit Central Office,
attn: Cyndi Bell, 4401 Reedy Creek Road, Raleigh, NC 27607.
Thanks,
Jen
1 of 1 4/27/00 12:25 P1V
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF
Regulatory Division
Action ID No. 200020130
Mr. John Dorney
Water Quality Section
Division of Water Quality
February 24, 2000
North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Dear Mr. Dorney:
Enclosed is the application of Mr. Donald W. Garner, Isakson-Barnahart for Department
of the Army (DA) authorization and a State Water Quality Certification for the excavation,
culverting, and fill of approximately 0.32 acre of wetlands and 0.23 acre (867 linear feet) of
stream channel (total of 0.55 acre of impacts to jurisdictional waters of the United States) of
Little Creek associated the construction of a new commercial retail development. The proposed
new construction site is located off of Hanes Mall Boulevard, in Winston-Salem, Forsyth
County, North Carolina. Your receipt of this letter verifies your acceptance of a valid request for
certification in accordance with Section 325.2(b)(ii) of our administrative regulations.
We are considering authorizing the proposed activity pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean
Water Act, and we have determined that a water quality certification is required under the
provisions of Section 401 of the same law. A Department of the Army permit will not be granted
until the certification has been obtained or waived.
In accordance with our administrative regulations, in most cases, 60 days after receipt of a
request for certification is a reasonable time for State action. Therefore, if you have not acted on
the request, or asked for an extension of time, by April 24, 2000, the District Engineer will deem
that waiver has occurred.
Printed on ® Recycled Paper
1?

If you have questions, please do not hesitate to contact Mr. John Thomas, Raleigh
Regulatory Field Office, telephone [phone].
Sincerely,
S. Kenneth Jolly
Chief, Raleigh Regulatory
Field Office
Enclosures
Copies Furnished (without enclosure):
Mr. Doug Huggett
Division of Coastal Management
North Carolina Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
1638 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1638
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT OMB APPROVAL NO. 0710-003
(33 CFR 325) Expires October 1996
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 5 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining he data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send
comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to
Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Service Directorate of Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson David Highway, Suite
1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302; and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003), Washington, DC 20503.
Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction
over the location of the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authority: 33 USC 401, Section 10; 1413, Section 404. Principal Purpose: These laws require permits authorizing activities in, or affecting, navigable
waters of the United States, the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States, and the transportation of dredged material for the
purpose of dumping it into ocean waters. Routine Uses: Information provided on this form will be used in evaluating the application for a permit.
Disclosure: Disclosure of requested information is voluntary. If information is not provided, however, the permit application cannot be processed nor
can a permit be issued.
One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this
application (see sample drawings and instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed
activity. An application that is not completed in full will be returned.
(ITEMS 1 THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS)
1. APPLICATION NO. 2. FIELD OFFICE CODE 3. DATE RECEIVED 4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETED
ITEMS BELOW TO BE FILLED BYAPPLICAN
5. APPLICANTS NAME 8. AUTHORIZED AGENTS NAME AND TITLE (an agent is not required)
Isakson-Barnhart, c/o Mr. Don Garner Charles R. Roadley, Jr.
Regulatory SpecialistfProject Manager
6. APPLICANTS ADDRESS 9. AGENT'S ADDRESS
25 Technology Parkway South, Suite 201 Williamsburg Environmental Group, Inc.
Norcross, Georgia 30092 3000 Easter Circle
Williamsburg, Virginia 23188
7. APPLICANTS PHONE NOS. W/AREA CODE 10. AGENT'S PHONE NOS W/AREA CODE
a. Residence a. Residence
b. Business [phone] b. Business [phone] [phone] (Fax)
11. b 1 A I tMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
I hereby authorize, to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to fumish, upon request,
supplemental information in support of this permit application.
Please see attached agent authorization form.
APPLICANTS SIGNATURE DATE
NAME, LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructions)
Winston-Salem Site
13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN (if applicable) 14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (if applicable)
Unnamed tributary to Little Creek N/A
a
m
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
az
1\.
Forsyth County (Winston Salem) NC r?
COUNTY STATE y?r
C
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN (see instructions) nc`
O?? O
Hanes Mall Boulevard, Immediately adjacent to Lowe's Home Center Z
17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
From the Intersection of Stafford Road and Hanes Mall Boulevard, travel wet on Hanes Mall Boulevard approximately 118 mile. Subject property is
located adjacent to Lowe's Home Center.
ENG. FORM 4345, Feb 94 EDITION OF SEP 91 IS OBSOLETE. (Proponent: CECW-OR)
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT OMB APPROVAL NO. 0710-003
(33 CFR 325) Expires October 1996
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 5 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining he data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send
comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to
Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Service Directorate of Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson David Highway, Suite
1204, Arlington, VA 22202.4302; and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003), Washington, DC 20503.
Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction
over the location of the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authority: 33 USC 401, Section 10; 1413, Section 404. Principal Purpose: These laws require permits authorizing activities in, or affecting, navigable
waters of the United States, the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States, and the transportation of dredged material for the
purpose of dumping it into ocean waters. Routine Uses: Information provided on this form will be used in evaluating the application for a permit
Disclosure: Disclosure of requested information is voluntary. If information is not provided, however, the permit application cannot be processed nor
can a permit be issued.
One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this
application (see sample drawings and instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed
activity. An application that is not completed in full will be returned.
(ITEMS 1 THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS)
1. APPLICATION NO. 2. FIELD OFFICE CODE P. DATE RECEIVED 4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETED
/ITEMS RFLOW TO RF FILLFD RV APPLirAivn
5. APPLICANT'S NAME 8. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE (an agent is not required)
Isakson-Barnhart, c/o Mr. Don Garner Charles R. Roadley, Jr.
Regulatory Specialist/Project Manager
6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS 9. AGENT'S ADDRESS
25 Technology Parkway South, Suite 201 Williamsburg Environmental Group, Inc.
Norcross, Georgia 30092 3000 Easter Circle
Williamsburg, Virginia 23188
7. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOS. W/AREA CODE 10. AGENT'S PHONE NOS W/AREA CODE
a. Residence a. Residence
b. Business [phone] b. Business [phone] [phone] (Fax)
11. STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
hereby authorize, to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to fumish, upon request,
supplemental information in support of this permit application.
Please see attached agent authorization form.
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE
NAME, LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructions)
Winston-Salem Site
13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN (if applicable) 14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (if applicable)
Unnamed tributary to Little Creek N/A
rn
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
Forsyth County (Winston-Salem) NC
COUNTY STATE y?
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN (see instructions) .nick C
o-o"C
Hanes Mall Boulevard, Immediately adjacent to Lowe's Home Center
17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
From the Intersection of Stafford Road and Hanes Mall Boulevard, travel wet on Hanes Mall Boulevard approximately 1/8 mile. Subject property is
located adjacent to Lowe's Home Center.
ENG. FORM 4345, Feb 94 EDITION OF SEP 91 IS OBSOLETE. (Proponent: CECW-OR)
18. Nature of Activity (Description of project, include all features)
The applicant for the 35-acre site is proposing a commercial retail center involving the construction of approximately 300,000 square feet of
commercial retail space, associated access roads, and a required stormwater management facility. The site is divided into two small drainages.
The western drainage (Area 1) consists of an intermittent stream/forested-headwater wetland with and onsite drainage area of 14 acres and an
offsite drainage area of 8 acres. Drainage within this area flows into a 42-inch culvert under Hanes Mall Blvd. The eastern drainage (Area II) is
somewhat larger with an onsite area of approx. 25 acres and an offsite drainage area of approx. 10 acres. Drainage within this section enters the
property from two existing culverts and exists the project through a 64-inch culvert under Hanes Mall Blvd. Neither of these waters is classified a
critical resources waters of trout waters.
19. Project Purpose (Describe the reason or purpose of the project, see instructions)
The project involves commercial development within a section of Hanes Mall Boulevard that has and continues to experience ongoing commercial
development The project's location makes this site desirable for commercial users who want to locate in this particular location adjacent to
existing roadway infrastructure and existing commercial enterprises.
USE BLOCKS 20-22 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for Discharge
A discharge into waters of the United States is required in order to meet the projects purpose and provide sufficient water quality treatment in the
proposed stormwater management facility. The site is severely constrained by existing topography and resource areas within the northern portion
of the site. In examining practicable development scenarios, the applicant evaluated the potential for avoidance of these resource areas within the
context of the project goals and objectives. The option of reducing commercial area was also investigated. This option, however, was ultimately
eliminated from consideration due to economic reasons. The projects location directly along the Hanes Mall Boulevard corridor makes this
property highly desirable commercial real estate. Further decreasing the amount of proposed building square footage is not possible due to the
applicant's need to make an acceptable return on investment
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards
Native soil will be utilized as a source of fill material. The applicant will make every effort to balance the earthworks onsite.
area of Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled (See Instructions)
The project involves permanent impacts to 0.32 acres of wetlands and 0.23 acres (867 linear feet) of other waters of the United States.
23. Is any portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes No X IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
24. Address of Adjoining Property owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (if more than can be entered here, please attach a supplemental
list).
Please see attached list.
25. List of Other Certifications or Approvals/Denials Received from other Federal, State or Local Agencies for Work Described in this Application.
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL* IDENTIFICATION NUMBER DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED
USACOE JD 199505069 August 28, 1995
*Would include but is not restricted to zoning building and flood plain permits
26. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that the information in this application is
complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the duly authorized agent for the
applicant.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE SIGNATURE OF AGIPIT /-' DATE
The application must be signed by the person who desires o undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly authorized agent if the
statement block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly and willfully
falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or representations or
makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than
$10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
'U. S. G P 0:1994520-478/82018
'61
AGENT CERTIFICATION OF AUTHORIZATION
I Mr. Donald W. Garner hereby certify that I have authorized Williamsburg Environmental Group, Inc.
[Applicant's Name] (Agent's Name)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary to the processing, issuance, acceptance of this permit and
any and all standard and special conditions attached.
We hereby certify that the tfotion submitted in this application is true and accurate the best of our
knowledge.
APPLICANTS SI NATURE AGENTS SIGNATYRE
DATE
1
DATE
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS
P.O. BOX 1890
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF
February 22, 2000
ory Division
N ID: 200020535
y Scoggin
S
I.k Limited Partnership
ily Street, Suite 200
Ile, Tennesse 27619
r. Scoggin:
i E

I,-S;

c?c
-; O
o

a
Reference is made to your Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) received on February 8,
)r the proposed Oak Summit Shopping Center located off of Hanes Mill Road, adjacent to
,med tributary of Mill Creek, north of Winston-Salem, in Forsyth County, North Carolina.
'N requested our review and verification that your project can be authorized by
rent of the Army (DA) nationwide permits pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water
The referenced PCN requested DA permit authorization to discharge fill into
mately 0.12 acre (including 490 linear feet of stream channel and adjacent wetlands) of
tional waters of the United States associated with an unnamed tributary of Mill Creek.
iew of the preliminary plans submitted with your request revealed that impacts to
tional waters of the United States are greater than those included in your PCN. This
ial work, not included in your PCN, involves discharging fill into an existing pond to
tormwater detention facilities. As your PCN does not include all anticipated work within
)r wetlands, we can not verify your requested DA permit authorization and consider the
be incomplete. Should you wish to continue to pursue DA nationwide permit
ration for your proposal, you will need to re-submit a modified application which includes
I.cts to jurisdictional waters.
Please be reminded that any placement of fill in jurisdictional waters of the United States,
ig wetlands, associated with your project without prior DA permit authorization will be a
n of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1311).
\?_?_
,..
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
WILMINGTON DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS 5U°
P.O. BOX 1890 ,
WILMINGTON, NORTH CAROLINA 28402-1890
REPLY TO
ATTENTION OF February 22, 2000
Regulatory Division
ACTION ID: 200020535
. :._ I

r
Mr. Guy Scoggin
'
Azur-US
.
rn
mo`
O

Blue Oak Limited Partnership Cl)
C_

500 Henly Street, Suite 200
Knoxville, Tennesse 27619
Dear Mr. Scoggin:
Reference is made to your Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) received on February 8,
2000, for the proposed Oak Summit Shopping Center located off of Hanes Mill Road, adjacent to
an unnamed tributary of Mill Creek, north of Winston-Salem, in Forsyth County, North Carolina.
This PCN requested our review and verification that your project can be authorized by
Department of the Army (DA) nationwide permits pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act.
The referenced PCN requested DA permit authorization to discharge fill into
approximately 0.12 acre (including 490 linear feet of stream channel and adjacent wetlands) of
jurisdictional waters of the United States associated with an unnamed tributary of Mill Creek.
Our review of the preliminary plans submitted with your request revealed that impacts to
jurisdictional waters of the United States are greater than those included in your PCN. This
additional work, not included in your PCN, involves discharging fill into an existing pond to
create stormwater detention facilities. As your PCN does not include all anticipated work within
waters or wetlands, we can not verify your requested DA permit authorization and consider the
PCN to be incomplete. Should you wish to continue to pursue DA nationwide permit
authorization for your proposal, you will need to re-submit a modified application which includes
all impacts to jurisdictional waters.
Please be reminded that any placement of fill in jurisdictional waters of the United States,
including wetlands, associated with your project without prior DA permit authorization will be a
violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1311).
Printed on ® Recycled Paper

Thank you for your time and cooperation. If you have any questions, please contact Mr.
John Thomas, Raleigh Regulatory Field Office, telephone [phone].
Sincerely,
S. Kenneth Jolly
Manager, Raleigh Regulatory
Field Office
Copies Furnished:
e -_'Mr. John Dorney
Water Quality Section
Division of Water Quality
North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Regional Office Manager
North Carolina Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
attn: Jennifer Frye
585 Waughton Street
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27107
Mr. J. Joseph Ferowich
ASG Inc.
412 Executive Tower Drive, Suite 403
Knoxville, TN 37923
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Bill Holman, Secretary
Kerr T. Stevens, Director
NC ENR
-monk
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
February 14, 2000
Isakson Barnharat
C/o Don Garner
25 Technology Parkway South, Suite 201
Norcross, Georgia 30092
Dear Mr. Bamharat:
Subject: 401 Water Quality Certification
Isakson-Barnhart Site
Forsyth County
DWQ #: 991172
On 20 October 1999 you wrote to the Division of Water Quality requesting a 401 Water Quality
Certification for your project to fill wetlands for commercial/industrial development at Hanes Mall Blvd. in
Forsyth County. We also have a 31 January 2000 response to our November 4, 1999 letter for additional
information. The US Army Corps of Engineers has informed us that this project will require an Individual
Permit for this project. We cannot continue to process your application until the Corps of Engineers issues a
Public Notice for this project to begin this the permitting process. Therefore I must place this project on
indefinite hold until you and Corps of Engineers gathers the necessary information to develop an acceptable
permit application.
If you believe that this decision is in error, please call me at 919-733-1786 to discuss the matter.
y
pterQuality I?
Certi ation Program
cc: Winston-Salem DWQ Regional Office
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Raleigh District Office
Central Files
File Copy
Chuck Roadley, Willamsburg Environmental Group, Inc. - 3000 Easter Circle, Willamsburg, VA 23188
Environmental Sciences Branch 1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27669-1621
Telephone [phone] FAX # [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post consumer paper
• r
FREE LAND and KAFF4
ENGIIW?P3 • fD?J?,?RL?l1?FC7.5'
TOW.
Etx: 9 t 9 - -9s s
2C
l
NY, 5 C +

POO= 3
.alt ate
and Fmac=; Irsc
??nvifle. ?ri?-?
Phom Dab.- (1 o c,
© U veri © For Revim L"1 Gcnuvat Q ftme awbf Q
bbl?
"?i t.? ? pF.+o 9
0e,:> Vore_3 t ,?•.?
w ?, i J Gnni 6rQ a nJ

111 ? c+J ?S ..

m?©

9 'West Stone Avenue + Crmville, 3aui?s
'd MZ'ON Tina 29609 • Telephone 864-?33.54 7 • Fa„ 864-233.85
NVNddAO q ONd HU WVZVI OOOZ

f
r"
?wc? a yy ? 11`12.
Facility Name:
Company Name:
Responsible Party:
Address :
Phone No..,
WATERSEED
Hanes
SSN#9 M
77OL417-1788
MAIlV'i'ENANCE AGREEMEN'T'
Shopping Center
I. Monthly, or after every runoffpr4ducing rainfall event, whichever comes first:
A. Inspect the trash rack; re ove accumulated debris, repair / replace if it is not
functioning.
B. Inspect and clear the o ' of any obstructions.
_ ?m hanisa :p nPz ?onvill be clteckedx` log aftest runs of the pump r
will- a t,.on,,site-rand a ava4ablefjo DWQ'personnel upon request.
C. Inspect the pond side slo and grassed :inlet swales, remove trash and repair
eroded areas before the rainfall event.
D. Pond outlet (rip-rap apro to be inspected to ensure no downstream erosion is
occurring. Rip-rap to be r eplaced where needed.
II. Quarterly (Four times it year):
A. Inspect the collection cyst (i.e. catch basins, piping, grassed swales) for proper
functioning. Accumulated rash will be cleaned from the basin grates, basin
bottoms, and piping will b* checked for obstructions and cleared as required.
B. , Pond inlets will be check for underattting. Rip-rap or other energy dissipation
structures will be rep and broken pipes will be repaired.
M. Semi-annually (twice a year):
A Accumulated sediment fro the bottom of the outlet structure will be removed.
B, The pond depth will be c ked at various points. Sediment removal is required
when the depth is reduced to 75% of the original forebay design depth of 6.Q feet.
Z 'd IEN' ON I ffld3Nd? '8 M133H NVZV:8 00H ' 9I' deS

POND MAINMNANCE
PAGE 2
IV. General.:
A. Mowing of the side do
Maximum grass height
B. Cattails are encouraged
they cover more than on
them is at the end of the
chemicals for use in kills
Agricultural Extension )
C. The orifice is designed tc
not accomplished in that
orifice. Slow draw down
clogging will be found ax
will be accomplished according to the season.
. be 6.
ag the perimeter, however they will be removed when
calf the surface area of the pond. The best time to cut
owing season, in November. Environmentally sensitive
cattails can also be used. Contact your nearest
v down the pond in the 2-5 days. If draw down is
the orifice will be replaced with a larger or smaller
be attributed to a clogged system. The source of the
D. All components of the d ention pond system will be kept in good working order.
Repair or replacement c onents will meet the original design specifications as
per the approved storm er plan If previously approved components are
determined to be ineffecti e, the component must be redesigned and/or replaced.
V. Special Requirements:
y acknowledge that I am the financially responsible
heri
party for maintenance of this detention n
d. I will be responsible for the performance of the
maintenance as outlined above, as part o$ the Stormwater Management Permit received for this
project.
Signature:
1, ± la+ C6V_N.F ll _ an(
County of &<5,A,? do heret
before me this a -?, _ day of ? yu
foregoing instrument. Witness my hand
Notary Public
Paa I:kAW caft
?4Consa?loaapas,?,? ? zoor
E 'd ISLZ'ON
Date:- . If'/ 2.,)' 6 a
tary public for the State of ,
r certify S M1 ?? n personally appeared
,fi 2040 and acknowledge the due execution of the
end official seat.
NVWddnVN q ONU33d3 NVZV:8 OOOZ '9l'dOS
Project No. DWQ 991003
Project Name:.Isakson-Barnhard
SUBMITTED DESIGN: REQUIRED DESIGN:
elevations status
Bottom of Basin (ft) 766
Permanent Pool (ft) 772 6 ft. depth ok
Temporary Pool (ft) 774.37 2.37 ft. depth ok
areas
Permanent Pool SA (sq ft)
3.5575
33107 sq. ft.
ok
Drainage Area (ac) 38.2
Impervious Area (ac) 72 76.4%
-
volumes
Permanent Pool (cu ft)
142020

C ?p
Temporary Pool (cu ft) 101950 102330 cu. ft. check tempc
Forebay (cu ft) 30955 21.8 % ok

other parameters
SA/DA 0 1.99 -
201
Orifice Diameter (in) 2.7 0.21 cfs drawdown -
Design Rainfall (in) 1 5.7 day drawdown check drawc ; .?
$ 7 1 y?
d
?1`
Linear Interpolation of Correct SAIDA***
6 ft. Permanent Pool Depth
% Impervious SA/DA from Table
Next Lowest 70 1.79
Project Impervious 76.4 1.99
Next Highest 80 2.1

dov A pas4f
? lr,/a0
`-7

5
4::2-4-5dw mow
lee

a
0
a
0
0
0
s
s
s
O
Q'
Er'
a
O
cc
cc
s
O
a
O
O
O
4
L.
?e
Taal
. i E[!!
J U L 2 6
w??,?tP: r ern;
Regional office
???lW
N' , .

M1EMO'RANI»_,eA

ion Water Qity
f
i
I Contact: Jennifer Frye
s
iti
D 2 ?, /
Date
EMO From:
ct: aa
_ 'pervisor: I_arry Coble
Date: 21112000
S
Subje
M

)unty Forsyth

v ? inty2
gion Winston-Salem

%-

/99-'`'i' Feet :.
...
Req. GtiijJ,
551.39: _

L
Mi

?
r
Is VV ON
?:,+ O N

Is Mil ssue/Cond O Deny
Provi .: ' t9' 00"
Coal
ON F NCDENR
1. Pr' Carolina Department of Environment and NaC 27 R0? ources
2. Di North htown street, Winston-Salem, N S)
3. U 585 Wau9
c Telephone [phone]
4. Do( _ ?N?c rPCi.
5. Die ..witation that thPv investigated the possibility of off-site
mitioa ,c)n
cc: Regional Office Page Number 1
Central Office

cn o
w o

0
N
cn -
'v

Z a
# ~
• •
N #

r
k ti
?

o

a

• N
O
M
ZOOM

0
"rL..
?x Ic N

LLE
(n aQ

. a
a
O
• A
0
0
H

z
. o
X
- a w
- 0 E,

- ODW w
W?
E
a H
W
. a?
a

?C
o
p4
?
\ODOO o A
z r-, 0 w U
?mw
z
r
O
-I V
>,
cl)
H U
1
w
_W?
? o a w
?,? 11
H r-NZ 000
CL03wo: c-?xwUY
J
J
J
O
Q-
Ir
.a
J
O
.-.
O
O
O

JUL26mon
r n
Regional Office
5
? ? 3 ?,
Division of Water Quality
MEMO From:_(:::??t Date a-11 Ad
To: Subject: ,,lu.k. -
99
Al" c,n
41
4
1?_?
0,
r
COW
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
585 Waughtown Street, Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Telephone [phone]
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney
Non-Discharge Branch
Regional Contact:
WQ Supervisor:
. Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Isakson-Barnhard
Project Number 99 1172
Recvd From APP
Received Date 10/20/99
Project Type Commercial

Certificates Stream
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
F IP F__ P-7- *N 112-94-11 I 1 - 30,704. 0.25 1,551.39
F-F-O Y O N ?????F__F__
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
WRP F- F- 867.00
1I111?
i` FT
li

Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y 0 N Did you request more info? 0 Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? 0 Y 0 N
Recommendation: 0 Issue 0 Issue/Cond 0 Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 36° 3' 50"
Longitude (ddmmss) 80° 19' 00"
Comments:
ON Nni Q I ETTER CENT BY REGION ON 11/4/99 for the following reasons:
1. Propose impacts greater than 500 LF, need to re-apply for IP -
2 Did not include all impacts to jurisrtictional waters (only the mitigatable waters)
? Used square otage instead of linear footage for intermittent channel
4 Did not include a delineated wetland with total acreage to be imparted,
5 Did not sufficiently provide documentatlon that they investigated the possibility of off-site
mjfigation -
County Forsyth
County2
Region Winston-Salem
Recvd By Region 10/26/99
cc: Regional Office Page Number 1
Central Office
Facility Name Isakson-Barnhard County Forsyth
Project Number 99 1172 Regional Contact: Jennifer Frye
Date: 2/1/2000
Comments (continued from page 1):
They submitted the addtional information requested on January 31, 2000.
1 The have applied for the IP - -
22. They have stated that they have accounted for all wetlands to be impactedi However, it is still the
position of this Office that a small area (<1 acre) of wetlands exists at the Lowe's property boundary in
Area II
3 In order to pay into the WRP- they need to contact Ron Ferrell to make certain that WRP will
accept their mitigation payment
4 The WSRO recommends that the WO certification be issued for the impacts proposed on
their AVOIDANCE PLAN, This plan minimizes the impacts to the permanent channel to 160 LF for a
road crossing. Moreover, if they were able to decrease that impact to less that 150 LF (remove the
traffic islands at th
IIQ?I? at that point). they would not be reauired to mitigate. (The project immediately
downstream (Michael Neill prQ.- . I has minimized their impacts to less than 150 LF for a road
crossing so it is possible even with frontaga_property )
It is known that the properties alono Hanes Mall Boulevard are rapidly developing for commercial use
and that DWO will see future prole +s downstream of this property. It is the belief of this Office that
the waters in this area are de6rading However, this SHOULD NOT be used as justification by the
developers to culvert, drain.. and fill as i+ is these projects that may be causing the dearae dation- 15
n QAG 2H 05060
1 YVlIV
cc: Regional Office Page Number 2
Central Office

V V ILLIAMSBURG
NVIRONMENTAL
?N_ROUP, INC.
RECEIVED
?,!.C. Dept. of EHNR
JAN 3 1 2000
VVinston-1,13 aI(?r
January 27, 2000
Mr. Larry D. Coble
NCDENR-DWQ
Winston-Salem Regional Office
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Re: DWQ Application # 99-1172
Winston-Salem Site
Additional Information
Dear Mr. Coble:
On behalf of our client, Williamsburg Environmental Group, Inc. (WEG) is pleased to provide
the following information, per your request of November 4, 1999. The information is itemized to
correspond to your letter.
1) Since the proposed impacts are greater than 500 linear feet, please contact the USACOE for
instructions regarding applying for an Individual Permit.
We have coordinated with the Corps regarding an Individual Permit application. Enclosed
please find a copy of our correspondence to the Corps including the application.
2) Please include the impacts to all jurisdictional waters.
I spoke with Mr. John Thomas regarding the jurisdictional determination that was approved
in August of 1995. Since I was not personally involved in the determination at that time, I
had to rely on Mr. Thomas for clarification on this point. His response to me was that as
long as the existing determination is valid, the limits of jurisdictional area are defined by the
mapping that was confirmed at that time. As such, he felt it inappropriate to modify the
delineation.
3) For Area I, the USACOE called this drainage jurisdictional waters with a square footage
requirement. However, NCDENR-DWQ utilizes only linear footage for stream channels
(mitigatable or not). Therefore, for sections of this channel noted as "waters impact",
please determine the linear footage of impact.
The project drawings have been revised to reflect the change requested.
4) If the delineated wetland in Area III (0.02acres) is to be impacted and the Corps determined
it jurisdictional, please include this with the total acreage of impact.
The wetland area identified on the jurisdictional determination as Area III is not a part of the
proposed project. No wetland impacts are proposed in this area.
3000 Easter Circle Williamsburg, Virginia 23188 [phone] FAX [phone]

Mr. Larry D. Coble
January 27, 2000
Page 2
S) It is mentioned in your application that "...no disturbed offsite areas were determined to be
suitable for wetland restoration or creation. " Please provide documentation as to how and
where sites were invested and why they are not suitable.
WEG evaluated the area along the backside of the property associated with Area III for
potential mitigation. While this property adjoins the project area it is not a part of the
project. Its landscape position is somewhat higher and has a limited drainage area. . For
surface water driven wetland compensation, our experience indicates a need for considerable
surface area drainage to support the compensation area. In our opinion, this site's higher
landscape position and limited drainage area exclude this site as a potential mitigation site.
Unfortunately, the applicant does not have access to any additional sites in the project area.
WEG also evaluated a stream channel alignment change to restore onsite, all or a portion of,
the stream channel that is proposed to be impacted. We evaluated alignments through the
project, along the northern perimeter adjacent to Hanes Mall Boulevard, and along the
western perimeter. None of these alternatives were determined to be engineeringly viable
due to the topography of the site.
WEG continues to support and recommend onsite mitigation when and where opportunities
exist. We also realize, however, what others have come to question, that fragmented,
piecemeal compensation can have reduced functional value and an increased likelihood of
failure. Hence, in this instance, we recommended a contribution to the Wetlands Restoration
Program where these dollars could be leveraged with other resources for larger
environmental gains.
In addition, the practicability of this project is directly related to the project's location and
visibility situated adjacent to existing commercial areas along a major thoroughfare. It is my
understanding from discussions with the Corps and NCDENR staff that the proposed
development of this site is consistent with other permit actions in the immediate vicinity.
We hope that this submittal answers all of your questions. We apologize for the delay in our
response. We were coordinating the Corps on the best direction to take this application
considering the anticipated changes to the Nationwide Permit program. If we can provide any
additional information, please do not hesitate to call me.
Sincerely,
Charles R. Roadley, Jr.
Regulatory Specialist/Project Manager
Enclosures
cc: Mr. John Thomas, USACOE
Mr. Donald W. Garner, Isakson-Barnhart
W
V V ILLIAMSBURG
NVIRONMENTAL
"N ROUP, INC.
January 27, 2000
Mr. John Thomas
US Army Corps of Engineers
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Environmental Consultants
Re: Winston-Salem Site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Applicant: Mr. Donald W. Garner
Isakson-Barnhart
25 Technology Parkway South, Suite 201
Norcross, Georgia 30092
This correspondence will follow up our discussions regarding the application submitted to you
last fall for the development of a site located in Winston-Salem, North Carolina. Enclosed please
find the application you requested along with the list of adjoining property owners and
certification of the list from Forsyth County. I have also included a revised set of project
drawings in both full size and 8.5 " x 11" format. Please append this material to the permit
support document that was submitted with the original application.
The only changes to the drawings are in the accounting for impacts to waters of the United
States. The North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR)
requested the linear footage on waters in Area I of the project site. I apologize for the delay in
responding to your request but based on our conversation regarding the pending changes in the
Nationwide Permit (NWP) program, we were in somewhat of a quandary as to how to proceed.
It is our understanding that under the new permits, the proposed impacts could be authorized by a
Nationwide Permit. The scheduling delays that have plagued the effective date of the proposed
changes, however, have caused us to proceed with the individual permit process at this time. It is
my understanding, based on our conversation, that should the new NWP's become effective
during the application review, my client has the option of withdrawing this application and
requesting that it be considered under the new NWP program.
On behalf of our client, the Williamsburg Environmental Group, Inc. (WEG) respectfully
requests that the Corps process this application. If you have any questions, please feel free to
call me at your convenience. Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Sincerely,
Charles R. Roadley, Jr.
Regulatory Specialist/Project Manager
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Larry Coble, NCDENR
Mr. Donald W. Garner, Isakson-Barnhart
3000 Easter Circle Williamsburg, Virginia 23188 [phone] FAX [phone]
Jw
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT I OMB APPROVAL NO. 0710-003
(33 CFR 325) Expires October 1996
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 5 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining he data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send
comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to
Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Service Directorate of Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson David Highway, Suite
1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302; and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003), Washington, DC 20503.
Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction
over the location of the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authority: 33 USC 401, Section 10;1413, Section 404. Principal Purpose: These laws require permits authorizing activities in, or affecting, navigable
waters of the United States, the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States, and the transportation of dredged material for the
purpose of dumping it into ocean waters. Routine Uses: Information provided on this form will be used in evaluating the application for a permit.
Disclosure: Disclosure of requested information is voluntary. If information is not provided, however, the permit application cannot be processed nor
can a permit be issued.
One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this
application (see sample drawings and instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed
activity. An application that is not completed in full will be returned.
(ITEMS 1 THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS)
1. APPLICATION NO. 2. FIELD OFFICE CODE 3. DATE RECEIVED 4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETED
TO BE
5. APPLICANT'S NAME 8. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE (an agent is not required)
Isakson-Barnhart, c/o Mr. Don Garner Charles R. Roadley, Jr.
Regulatory Specialist/Project Manager
6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS 9. AGENT'S ADDRESS
25 Technology Parkway South, Suite 201 Williamsburg Environmental Group, Inc.
Norcross, Georgia 30092 3000 Easter Circle
Williamsburg, Virginia 23188
7. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOS. W/AREA CODE 10. AGENT'S PHONE NOS W/AREA CODE
a. Residence a. Residence
b. Business [phone] b. Business [phone] [phone] (Fax)
11. STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
I hereby authorize, to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish, upon request,
supplemental information in support of this permit application.
Please see attached agent authorization form.
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE
DATE
NAME, LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructions)
Winston-Salem Site
13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN (if applicable) 114. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (if applicable)
Unnamed tributary to Little Creek N/A
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
Forsyth County (Winston-Salem) NC
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN (seeinstruc6ons)
Hanes Mall Boulevard, Immediately adjacent to Lowe's Home Center
17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
From the intersection of Stafford Road and Hanes Mall Boulevard, travel wet on Hanes Mall Boulevard approximately 1/8 mile. Subject property is
located adjacent to Lowe's Home Center.
J
ENG. FORM 4345, Feb 94 EDITION OF SEP 91 IS OBSOLETE. (Proponent: CECW-OR)

18. Nature of Activity (Description of project, include all features)
The applicant for the 35-acre site is proposing a commercial retail center involving the construction of approximately 300,000 square feet of
commercial retail space, associated access roads, and a required stormwater management facility. The site is divided into two small drainages.
The western drainage (Area 1) consists of an intermittent stream/forested-headwater wetland with and onsite drainage area of 14 acres and an
offsite drainage area of 8 acres. Drainage within this area flows into a 42-inch culvert under Hanes Mail Blvd. The eastern drainage (Area 11) is
somewhat larger with an onsite area of approx. 25 acres and an offsite drainage area of approx. 10 acres. Drainage within this section enters the
property from two existing culverts and exists the project through a 54-inch culvert under Hanes Mall Blvd. Neither of these waters is classified a
critical resources waters of trout waters.
19. Project Purpose (Describe the reason or purpose of the project, see instructions)
The project involves commercial development within a section of Hanes Mall Boulevard that has and continues to experience ongoing commercial
development The project's location makes this site desirable for commercial users who want to locate in this particular location adjacent to
existing roadway infrastructure and existing commercial enterprises.
USE BLOCKS 20-22 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
20. Reason(s) for Discharge
A discharge into waters of the United States is required in order to meet the projects purpose and provide sufficient water quality treatment in the
proposed stormwater management facility. The site is severely constrained by existing topography and resource areas within the northern portion
of the site. In examining practicable development scenarios, the applicant evaluated the potential for avoidance of these resource areas within the
context of the project goals and objectives. The option of reducing commercial area was also investigated. This option, however, was ultimately
eliminated from consideration due to economic reasons. The projects location directly along the Hanes Mall Boulevard corridor makes this
property highly desirable commercial real estate. Further decreasing the amount of proposed building square footage is not possible due to the
applicant's need to make an acceptable return on investment
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards
Native soil will be utilized as a source of fill material. The applicant will make every effort to balance the earthworks onsite.
22. Surface area of Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled (See Instructions)
The project involves permanent impacts to 0.32 acres of wetlands and 0.23 acres (867 linear feet) of other waters of the United States.
23. Is any portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes No X IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
24. Address of Adjoining Property owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (if more than can be entered here, please attach a supplemental
list).
Please see attached list.
25. List of Other Certifications or Approvals/Denials Received from other Federal, State or Local Agencies for Work Described in this Application.
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL* IDENTIFICATION NUMBER DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED
USACOE JD 199505069
August 28, 1995
"Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building and flood lain permits
26. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. 1 certify that the information in this application is
complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the duly authorized agent for the
applicant.
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE SIGNATURE OF AG DATE
The application must be signed by the person who desires o undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly authorized agent if the
statement block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly and willfully
falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fad or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or representations or
makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than
$10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
'U.S.GPO 1994 5201478 820 10

AGENT CERTIFICATION OF AUTHORIZATION
I Mr. Donald W. Garner hereby certify that I have authorized Williamsburg Environmental Group, Inc.
[Applicant's Name] (Agent's Name)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary to the processing, issuance, acceptance of this permit and
any and all standard and special conditions attached.
We hereby certify that the ' fo tion submitted in this
knowledge.
APPLICANTS SIG-NATURE
DATE
application is true and accurate_tp the best of our
AGENTS SIGNA
DATE

_.----------- I 1
I I I ag °k
v i I r)ocn
i m
1. ? Li o°. cv v v o o?
? N I T y e ,?.?\ y

?'t I o- dT o x fl ? ?
?,

?
' /
(a/9 .09) C91C 9S
MR TI Yn S?

w O
oQ

r 17)

M

`^1 •h1 **1 13 f1

W o L? 41
w v tV
4j co
-

& A

o c5p 1 1
r? >, b
a - " •? ?b
p
>? T
9-
Oi
oQ
T
Xtyi x? ® ? ®??

699 C
y3
E '
nn ±
n ;
l
D eE
D
tai l q
1 ?m
N !p
0 rn 8
Z O 0 N = O O r
Fn m
`" `"
g
D g Fn
`" 9 mv

?w (D1
N
aw W
°
? N
$
N h
AAA ?A?
FFnATE:OCTOBER 13, 1999
RY 15, 2000 T ILUAMSBURG ENVIRONMENTA L GROUP, INC.
941 JOB R WETLAND IMPACTS MAP-SELECTED ALTERNATIVE `, LL?%'
0' WINSTON-SALEM SITE EnvironN-BARNHART DEVELOPMENT WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA
NY 0000 ra.r afa.. ?wi.m.wq. nryw arse (n>) ao-eeea
0
va
-a?
Oq

'

L_ Vol-
C>
r ?
i (A/H .00) OSLO AS '0A7B MR SZNVH
O ?
-11
V' ^?.? ? j Q Q 0
t( ? \ Q
6 Q Q lA1 cQ '? `I.1
0 -4J -13
g r ?o
mM? mtAF
n
Egg ` ?g
OOy; to N ?
W ?
t=n ?1 yy
?1 t? A ttnl ?
?

q O
N
M '
j r?i
? 3 0 0
T_
G
?
D
? ? D N N ?
? mm
Z
o
n n n a
e? D
p(
3w N

w W
N
?
?"
? u• w
? ?

fEDATE::E: OCTOBER 13, 1999 ED: JANUARY 15, 2000 WETLANND IMPACTS MAP-AVOIDANCE FFWILSBURI'mental ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP, INC.
UMBE1• 100• WINSTON-SALEM SITE Consultants
ISAKSON-BARNHART DEVELOPMENT WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA
COMPANY m.e?. nrdnl. Mw (m) ao-eeec
Adjacent Property Owners List
List Certification from Forsyth County
Mailing Labels

WM. A. (PETE) RODDA, CAE
ASSESSOR/COLLECTOR
HAROLD RENFRO,CMS
ASST. ASSESSOR
t

?O K
V `

ALDON M. IDOL
REAL ESTATE
N. DELBERT LAUTEN, JR.
PERSONAL PROPERTY
RICHARD L. DAVIS, CMS
GIS/MAPPING
ASSESSOR'S OFFICE
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
THE ATTACKED LIST(S) CONTAIN THE IDENTIFIERS, OWNERS, AND OWNERS' ADDRESSES
ACCORDING TO TAX OFFICE RECORDS FOR THE SUBJECT AND ADJOINING PROPERTIES:
1
TI IIS 'rimjf DAY OF 19
?? C,
NUMBER OF ATTACHED SHEETS
n
°p'tr
00
BY:
r?cJ
TAX OWNER : BRENDA G SMITH
: TOMMY R SMITH
Mail Add : 699 DEER TRACK LN
: PURLEAR , NC 28665-0000
----------------------------------------------------------- -------------------
BLKLOT : 3984 028 STATUS: C
PROPERTY Add : 2851 EDDYSTONE LN
TAX OWNER : LLOYD MARTIN SMITH
Mail Add : 2851 EDDYSTONE LN
: WINSTON-SALEM , NC 27103-5419
-------------------------------------------------------------------r -----------
BLKLOT : 3984 031 STATUS: C
PROPERTY Add : 2901 EDDYSTONE LN
TAX OWNER : JERRY LEON SMITH
Mail Add : 2901 EDDYSTONE LN
: WINSTON-SALEM , NC 27103-5421
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BLKLOT : 4028 020 STATUS: C
PROPERTY Add : 2911 SPRINGHAVEN DR
TAX OWNER CHARLES R STUMP
SARAH STUMP
Mail Add 2911 SPRINGHAVEN DR
WINSTON-SALEM NC 27103-5454
------------------------------------------------------------------------.-------
BLKLOT : 4028 021D STATUS: C ADDLOTS: 021F
PROPERTY Add : 2550 CREEKWOOD DR
TAX OWNER : EARL G YOUNG
: HEIDI YOUNG
Mail Add : 2550 CREEKWOOD DR
: WINSTON-SALEM , NC 27103-5462
------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------
BLKLOT : 6197 001 STATUS: C ADDLOTS: 002
PROPERTY Add : 950 HANES MALL BLVD
TAX OWNER : FIRST SECURITY BANK OF UTAH
care of : TRUSTEE FOR PET STORES TRUST
Mail Add : 19601 N 27TH AVE
: PHOENIX , AZ 85027-4008
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BLKLOT : 6373 003 STATUS: F
PROPERTY Add : 100 HANES SQUARE CIR
NEW OWNER : PRIMAX PROPERTIES LLC
Mail Add : 1115 E MOREHEAD•ST
: CHARLOTTE , NC 28204-0000
------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------
BLKLOT : 6373 004 STATUS: F
PROPERTY Add 110 HANES SQUARE CIR
NEW OWNER IIM??C??iOIIIQ,'?i
Ma i l eAdd
-----------------------
-------------------- Ch --- ? --- --------
BLKLOT : 6373 005 STATUS: F
PROPERTY Add : 120 HANES SQUARE CIR
NEW OWNER : MICHAEL NEILL PROPERTIES LLC
care of : MANNER STATION
Mail Add - POBox: 25107 Route: Box:
WINSTQN-SALEM , NC 27114-5107 ,
tsysdate: 19990925

*******************************************************************************
**** THE SUBJECT PROPERTY LIST **** PRINT DATE: 01-OCT-1999
BLKLOT : 3901 030C STATUS: C ADDLOTS: 114
PROPERTY Add : 0 HANES MALL BLVD
TAX OWNER : EUGENIA S DULL - ETAL
care of : LUCY DONADIO
Mail Add : 5925 ARDEN DR
: CLEMMONS , NC 27012-9407
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BLKLOT : 3901 033A STATUS: C
PROPERTY Add : 0 BECKWOOD DR
TAX OWNER : REBECCA A BAIRD - ETAL
Mail Add : 917 WOODCREST DR
: ROYAL OAK MI 48067-1617
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BLKLOT : 3901 033B STATUS: C
PROPERTY Add : 0 BECKWOOD DR
TAX OWNER : EUGENIA S ET AL DULL - ETAL
care of : LUCY DONADIO
Mail Add : 5925 ARDEN DR
: CLEMMONS NC 27012-9407
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BLKLOT : 3901 034 STATUS: C
PROPERTY Add : 2800 EDDYSTONE LN
TAX OWNER JAYNE RUSSELL SOMMER
Mail Add 2800 EDDYSTONE LN
WINSTON-SALEM , NC 27103-5420
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BLKLOT`: 3901 035C STATUS: C ADDLOTS: 035H
PROPERTY Add 2830 EDDYSTONE LN -
TAX OWNER : EUGENIA S DULL
care of : LUCY DONADIO
Mail Add : 5925 ARDEN DR
: CLEMMONS , NC 27012-9407
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BLKLOT : 3901 035F STATUS: C
PROPERTY Add : 0 EDDYSTONE LN
TAX OWNER EUGENIA S DULL
care of LUCY DONADIO
Mail Add 5925 ARDEN DR
CLEMMONS , NC 27012-9407
---------------------------,---------------------------------------------------
BLKLOT : 3901 102A STATUS: C
PROPERTY Add ! 0 CREEKWOOD DR
TAX OWNER : EUGENIA S DULL
Eugenia S. Dull, et al Rebecca A. Baird, et al Jayne Russell Sommer
c/o Lucy Donadio 917 Woodcrest Dr 2800 Eddystone Ln
5925 Arden Dr Royal Oak, MI 48067-1617 Winston-Salem, NC 27103-5420
Clemmons, NC 27012-9407
Brenda G. Smith
Tommy R. Smith
699 Deer Track Ln
Purlear, NC 28665-0000
Charles R. Stump
Sarah Stump
2911 Springhaven Dr
Winston-Salem, NC 27103-5454
Primax Properties LLC
1115 E. Morehead St
Charoltte, NC 28204-0000
Lloyd Martin Smith Jerry Leon Smith
2851 Eddystone Ln 2901 Eddystone Ln
Winston-Salem, NC 27103-5419 Winston-Salem, NC 27103-5454
Earl G. Young First Security Bank of Utah
Heidi Young c/o Trustee for Pet Stores Trust
2550 Creekwood Dr 19601 N. 27 Ave
Winston-Salem, NC 27103-5462 Phoenix, AZ 85027-4008
Michael Neill Properties LLC
Manner Station
P.O. Box 25107
Winston-Salem, NC 27114-5107
MEMO
TO:

A C RFS
ReQ
4. 3a
70 e R
From:
M STATE o
North Carolina Department of Environment,
Health, and Natural Resources e,,? Printed on Recyo
DATE: T Zoo
Akso„J ' B,42NJf?,eJj
SUBJECT:
a c-4--k_ " -;kL t.,-m G,e ti.J
Ah ?-
FF i _nrr?Ra?rTENT ?'E2ENNlAL
QF (?
)3DS. L,,9 yu 1.0
$c?? . ?a

????
?t?

MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact:
Non-Discharge Branch WQ Supervisor:
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Isakson-Barnhard
Project Number 99 1172
Recvd From APP
Received Date 10/20/99
Project Type Commercial
Recvd By Region 10/26/99
County Forsyth
County2
Region Winston-Salem
Certificates Stream
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
IP F_ O Y O N F 12-94-11 I ?- 30,704. 0.25 7,551.39
F-F-O Y ON F F_ F__F__ F_ (- F-
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
WRP F- I - 867.00
F_ 1 F_
i?
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? Q Y 0 N Did you request more info? ( Y
j ,
ON
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? Q Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? QQ Y O N
Recommendation: Q Issue OO Issue/Cond O Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 36° 3' 50"
Longitude (ddmmss) 80° 19' 00"
Comments:
ON uni D I FTTER SENT BY REGION ON 11/4/99 for the following reasons:
1. Prog ? impacts greater than 500 LF, need to re-apply for IP_
2 Did not include all im ace is to *urisdicticnal waters. (only the mitiaatable waters)
3 Used square footage instead of linear footage for intermittent channel
4 Did not include a delineated wetland with total acreage to be impacted
5 Did not sufficiently provide documentation that they investigated the possibility of off-site
rriffigation -
cc: Regional Office Page Number 1
Central Office
Facility Name Isakson-Barnhard County Forsyth
Project Number 99 1172 Regional Contact: Jennifer Frye
Date: 2/1/2000
Comments (continued from page 1):
They submitted the addtional information requested on January 31 2000.
1. They have applied for the IP
2• They have stated that they have accounted for all wetlands to be impacted, However, it is still the
position of this Office that a small area (<1 acre) of wetlands exists at the Lowe's property boundary in
Area II
3 In order to pay into the WRP,they need to contact Ron Ferrell to make certain that WRP will
accept their metiClatmon payment.
The WSRO recommends that the WO certification be issued for the impacts imposed on
their AVOIDANCE PLAN This plan minimizes the impacts to the permanent channel to 160 LF for a_
road crossing Moreover, if they were able to decrease that impact to less that 150 LF (remove the
traffic islands at that point) theY would not be required to mitigate. (The _project immediately
downstream (Michael-Neill property) has minimized their impacts to less than 150 LF for a road
Crossing en it is poss*ble even with frontaoe property.)
It is known that the properties along Hanes Mall Boulevard are rapidly de a ping for commercial use
and that DWO will see future proiects downstream of this prQperty. It is the belief of this Office that
the waters On this s area are degrading However1 this SHOULD NOT he used as justification by the
the yy QlGl ? 11 1 ll II
developers to culvert, drain, and fill, as these projects that may be ca! sing the degradation. 15A
NQ n r 2H 05060
1 Y V/""?V
cc: Regional Office Page Number 2
Central Office
.•?L..._..---- -•-----.._.._..?
a
I yt r:.: C4
.;
f
I n c? s C, C-) 4 ? c .0 C-? ? ? ? .?. .
s
Ai T /
..,n1 a :? :.? c= c? o Y o c > :,?%••!
FQ
. `? I ?:.> c ? c:... . _ tub c ::.> c i _ ? .?. .
?_
- --
? U L? _. ? y
_ r?.
n
?;'?y ? (x/a .09) 65 [E 96 'OA7fl 71YN 63NYF7 /
S
_Z
? ? 0 000
i
W 0
c4
°4 6 +?
$ Ut j LN
? .C ,,1 oQ, p ?
S C
? n n
DATE: OCTOBER 13, 1999
REVISED: JANUARY 15, 2000 WETLAND'.:IMPACTS MAP-SELECTED ALTERNATIVE ILLIAMSBURG ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP, INC.
JOB NUMBER: 941 - - -
scALE: 1 =loo WINSTON-SALEM SITE r Environmental consultants
SOURCE: ISARSON-HARNHART DEVELOPMENT WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA y
COMPANY ?ooo e.w. nw. nw.m.ew?. wpv. - M7) ao-eeno
? mr
?
? N ?
n N `m
-?i
E E to
?? ?
i
i `
? D D T A C
p yy

? Z
m p
n O
'? a

? y
e
c?c?? -'
m e ?
g g m
D y
r D
D N w t? g
r O z
D
D D ? 3
N
N
D

?0W tl
N

??W
N
°
?

i `- -
i .
i
vs \1\
v `
$ oQ
O
e n
MJ
g

i
43 ?

I eI ? 6
I '
qq Wa .ae) CSIE US aA78 Ta7f SiNYH
a?

G
?' mn?n ml?
? ADD

g= V
V6g m` .
E
0 1-
O ? ? O ? CI N ? 3 ? O r

a D A
L7 pp
?b ? ? B w O+ 1D

DATE: OCTOBER 13, 1999
REVISED: JANUARY 15, 2000,7
JOB NUMBER: 941
SCALE: 1• = 100'
SOURCE: ISAKSON-BARNHART DEVELOPMENT
COMPANY
WETLAND IMPACTS MAP-AVOIDANCE FEREnvironmental ENVIRONMENTAL GROUP, INC.
WINSTON-SALEM SITE Consultants
WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH CAROLINA
-m?. Ytrd =85 (M) ?Mg
J
4011-
V V ILLIAMSBURG
NVIRONMENTAL
'! ROUP, INC.
RECEIVED
N.C. De Pt. of EHNR
.1A N 3 1 2000
i ?instor-Sraie,r
January 27, 2000
Mr. Larry D. Coble
NCDENR-DWQ
Winston-Salem Regional Office
585 Waughtown Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27107
Re: DWQ Application # 99-1172
Winston-Salem Site
Additional Information
Dear Mr. Coble:
On behalf of our client, Williamsburg Environmental Group, Inc. (WEG) is pleased to provide
the following information, per your request of November 4, 1999. The information is itemized to
correspond to your letter.
1) Since the proposed impacts are greater than 5001inear feet, please contact the USACOE for
instructions regarding applying for an Individual Permit.
We have coordinated with the Corps regarding an Individual Permit application. Enclosed
please find a copy of our correspondence to the Corps including the application.
2) Please include the impacts to all jurisdictional waters.
I spoke with Mr. John Thomas regarding the jurisdictional determination that was approved
in August of 1995. Since I was not personally involved in the determination at that time, I
had to rely on Mr. Thomas for clarification on this point. His response to me was that as
long as the existing determination is valid, the limits of jurisdictional area are defined by the
mapping that was confirmed at that time. As such, he felt it inappropriate to modify the
delineation.
3) For Area I, the USACOE called this drainage jurisdictional waters with a square footage
requirement. However, NCDENR-DWQ utilizes only linear footage for stream channels
(mitigatable or not). Therefore, for sections of this channel noted as "waters impact",
please determine the linear footage of impact.
The project drawings have been revised to reflect the change requested.
4) If the delineated wetland in Area III (0.02acres) is to be impacted and the Corps determined
it jurisdictional, please include this with the total acreage of impact.
The wetland area identified on the jurisdictional determination as Area III is not a part of the
proposed project. No wetland impacts are proposed in this area.
3000 Easter Circle Williamsburg, Virginia 23188 [phone] FAX [phone]
t -# -
Mr. Larry D. Coble
January 27, 2000
Page 2
S) It is mentioned in your application that "...no disturbed offsite areas were determined to be
suitable for wetland restoration or creation. " Please provide documentation as to how and
where sites were invested and why they are not suitable.
WEG evaluated the area along the backside of the property associated with Area III for
potential mitigation. While this property adjoins the project area it is not a part of the
project. Its landscape position is somewhat higher and has a limited drainage area. For
surface water driven wetland compensation, our experience indicates a need for considerable
surface area drainage to support the compensation area. In our opinion, this site's higher
landscape position and limited drainage area exclude this site as a potential mitigation site.
Unfortunately, the applicant does not have access to any additional sites in the project area.
WEG also evaluated a stream channel alignment change to restore onsite, all or a portion of,
the stream channel that is proposed to be impacted. We evaluated alignments through the
project, along the northern perimeter adjacent to Hanes Mall Boulevard, and along the
western perimeter. None of these alternatives were determined to be engineeringly viable
due to the topography of the site.
WEG continues to support and recommend onsite mitigation when and where opportunities
exist. We also realize, however, what others have come to question, that fragmented,
piecemeal compensation can have reduced functional value and an increased likelihood of
failure. Hence, in this instance, we recommended a contribution to the Wetlands Restoration
Program where these dollars could be leveraged with other resources for larger
environmental gains.
In addition, the practicability of this project is directly related to the project's location and
visibility situated adjacent to existing commercial areas along a major thoroughfare. It is my
understanding from discussions with the Corps and NCDENR staff that the proposed
development of this site is consistent with other permit actions in the immediate vicinity.
We hope that this submittal answers all of your questions. We apologize for the delay in our
response. We were coordinating the Corps on the best direction to take this application
considering the anticipated changes to the Nationwide Permit program. If we can provide any
additional information, please do not hesitate to call me.
Sincerely,
Charles R. Roadley, Jr.
Regulatory Specialist/Project Manager
Enclosures
cc: Mr. John Thomas, USACOE
Mr. Donald W. Garner, Isakson-Barnhart
l
V V ILLIAMSBURG
NVIRONMENTAL
N ROUP, INC.
January 27, 2000
Mr. John Thomas
US Army Corps of Engineers
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Re: Winston-Salem Site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Applicant: Mr. Donald W. Garner
Isakson-Barnhart
25 Technology Parkway South, Suite 201
Norcross, Georgia 30092
Environmental Consultants
This correspondence will follow up our discussions regarding the application submitted to you
last fall for the development of a site located in Winston-Salem, North Carolina. Enclosed please
find the application you requested along with the list of adjoining property owners and
certification of the list from Forsyth County. I have also included a revised set of project
drawings in both full size and 8.5 " x I V format. Please append this material to the permit
support document that was submitted with the original application.
The only changes to the drawings are in the accounting for impacts to waters of the United
States. The North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR)
requested the linear footage on waters in Area I of the project site. I apologize for the delay in
responding to your request but based on our conversation regarding the pending changes in the
Nationwide Permit (NWP) program, we were in somewhat of a quandary as to how to proceed.
It is our understanding that under the new permits, the proposed impacts could be authorized by a
Nationwide Permit. The scheduling delays that have plagued the effective date of the proposed
changes, however, have caused us to proceed with the individual permit process at this time. It is
my understanding, based on our conversation, that should the new NWP's become effective
during the application review, my client has the option of withdrawing this application and
requesting that it be considered under the new NWP program.
On behalf of our client, the Williamsburg Environmental Group, Inc. (WEG) respectfully
requests that the Corps process this application. If you have any questions, please feel free to
call me at your convenience. Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Sincerely,oadle
Charles R. Ry, Jr.
Regulatory Specialist/Project Manager
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Larry Coble, NCDENR
Mr. Donald W. Garner, Isakson-Barnhart
3000 Easter Circle Williamsburg, Virginia 23188 [phone] FAX [phone]
APPLICATION FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY PERMIT I OMB APPROVAL NO. 0710-003
(33 CFR 325) Expires October 1996
Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 5 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining he data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send
comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to
Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Service Directorate of Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson David Highway, Suite
1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302; and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0710-0003), Washington, DC 20503.
Please DO NOT RETURN your form to either of those addresses. Completed applications must be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction
over the location of the proposed activity.
PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
Authority: 33 USC 401, Section 10;1413, Section 404. Principal Purpose: These laws require permits authorizing activities in, or affecting, navigable
waters of the United States, the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States, and the transportation of dredged material for the
purpose of dumping it into ocean waters. Routine Uses: Information provided on this fonn will be used in evaluating the application for a permit
Disclosure: Disclosure of requested information is voluntary. If information is not provided, however, the permit application cannot be processed nor
can a permit be issued.
One set of original drawings or good reproducible copies which show the location and character of the proposed activity must be attached to this
application (see sample drawings and instructions) and be submitted to the District Engineer having jurisdiction over the location of the proposed
activity. An application that is not completed in full will be returned.
(ITEMS I THRU 4 TO BE FILLED BY THE CORPS)
1. APPLICATION NO. 2. FIELD OFFICE CODE 3. DATE RECEIVED 4. DATE APPLICATION COMPLETED
ITEMS BELOW TO BE FILLED BY APPL/CAN
5. APPLICANT'S NAME 8. AUTHORIZED AGENT'S NAME AND TITLE (an agent is not required)
Isakson-Barnhart, c/o Mr. Don Garner Charles R. Roadley, Jr.
Regulatory S ialist/Pro' t Manager
6. APPLICANT'S ADDRESS 9. AGENT'S ADDRESS
25 Technology Parkway South, Suite 201 Williamsburg Environmental Group, Inc.
Norcross, Georgia 30092 3000 Easter Circle
Williamsburg, Virginia 23188
7. APPLICANT'S PHONE NOS. W/AREA CODE 10. AGENT'S PHONE NOS W/AREA CODE
a. Residence a. Residence
b. Business [phone] b. Business [phone] [phone] (Fax)
11. STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
I hereby authorize, to act in my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish, upon request,
supplemental information in support of this permit application.
Please see attached agent authorization form.
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE DATE
NAME, LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT OR ACTIVITY
12. PROJECT NAME OR TITLE (see instructions)
Winston-Salem Site
13. NAME OF WATERBODY, IF KNOWN (if applicable) 14. PROJECT STREET ADDRESS (if applicable)
Unnamed tributary to Little Creek WA
15. LOCATION OF PROJECT
Forsyth County (Winston-Salem) NC
COUNTY STATE
16. OTHER LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS, IF KNOWN (see instructions)
Hanes Mall Boulevard, Immediately adjacent to Lowe's Home Center
17. DIRECTIONS TO THE SITE
From the intersection of Stafford Road and Hanes Mall Boulevard, travel wet on Hanes Mall Boulevard approximately 1/8 mile. Subject property is
located adjacent to Lowe's Home Center.
ENG. FORM 4345. Feb 94 EDITION OF SEP 91 IS OBSOLETE. (Proponent: CECW-OR)
18. Nature of Activity (Description of project, include all features)
The applicant for the 35-acre site is proposing a commercial retail center involving the construction of approximately 300,000 square feet of
commercial retail space, associated access roads, and a required stormwater management facility. The site is divided into two small drainages.
The western drainage (Area 1) consists of an intermittent stream/forested-headwater wetland with and onsite drainage area of 14 acres and an
offsite drainage area of 8 acres. Drainage within this area flows into a 42-inch culvert under Hanes Mall Blvd. The eastern drainage (Area 11) is
somewhat larger with an onsite area of approx. 25 acres and an offsite drainage area of approx. 10 acres. Drainage within this section enters the
property from two existing culverts and exists the project through a 64-inch culvert under Hanes Mall Blvd. Neither of these waters is classified a
critical resources waters of trout waters.
19. Project Purpose (Describe the reason or purpose of the project, see instructions)
The project involves commercial development within a section of Hanes Mall Boulevard that has and continues to experience ongoing commercial
development The project's location makes this site desirable for commercial users who want to locate in this particular location adjacent to
existing roadway infrastructure and existing commercial enterprises.
USE BLOCKS 20-22 IF DREDGED AND/OR FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE DISCHARGED
Reason(s) for Discharge
A discharge into waters of the United States is required in order to meet the projects purpose and provide sufficient water quality treatment in the
proposed stormwater management facility. The site is severely constrained by existing topography and resource areas within the northern portion
of the site. In examining practicable development scenarios, the applicant evaluated the potential for avoidance of these resource areas within the
context of the project goals and objectives. The option of reducing commercial area was also investigated. This option, however, was ultimately
eliminated from consideration due to economic reasons. The projects location directly along the Hanes Mall Boulevard corridor makes this
property highly desirable commercial real estate. Further decreasing the amount of proposed building square footage is not possible due to the
applicant's need to make an acceptable return on investment.
21. Type(s) of Material Being Discharged and the Amount of Each Type in Cubic Yards
Native soil will be utilized as a source of fill material. The applicant will make every effort to balance the earthworks onsite.
22. Surface area of Acres of Wetlands or Other Waters Filled (See instructions)
The project involves permanent impacts to 0.32 acres of wetlands and 0.23 acres (867 linear feet) of other waters of the United States.
23. Is any portion of the Work Already Complete? Yes No X IF YES, DESCRIBE THE COMPLETED WORK
24. Address of Adjoining Property owners, Lessees, Etc., Whose Property Adjoins the Waterbody (if more than can be entered here, please attach a supplemental
list).
Please see attached list.
25. List of Other Certifications or Approvals/Denials Received from other Federal, State or Local Agencies for Work Described in this Application.
AGENCY TYPE APPROVAL* IDENTIFICATION NUMBER DATE APPLIED DATE APPROVED DATE DENIED
USACOE JD 199505069
August 28,1995
'Would include but is not restricted to zoning, building and flood lain permits
26. Application is hereby made for a permit or permits to authorize the work described in this application. I certify that the information in this application is
complete and accurate. I further certify that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein or am acting as the duly authorized agent for the
applicant.
L lQP7
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE SIGNATURE OF AG DATE
The application must be signed by the person who desires o undertake the proposed activity (applicant) or it may be signed by a duly authorized agent if the
statement block 11 has been filled out and signed.
18 U.S.C. Section 1001 provides that: Whoever, in any manner within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly and willfully
falsifies, conceals, or covers up any trick, scheme, or disguises a material fact or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or representations or
makes or uses any false writing or document knowing same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or entry, shall be fined not more than
$10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years or both.
AGENT CERTIFICATION OF AUTHORIZATION
I Mr. Donald W. Garner hereby certify that I have authorized Williamsburg Environmental Group, Inc.
[Applicant's Name] (Agent's Name)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary to the processing, issuance, acceptance of this permit and
any and all standard and special conditions attached.
We hereby certify that the ' fo tion submitted in this application is true and accurate_tp the best of our
?knowledge.
- -::_ Z4;& . x
APPLICANTS SIGNATURE AGENTS SIGNATVRE
DATE ?? `'?, DATE
Adjacent Property Owners List
List Certification from Forsyth County
Mailing Labels
t
WM. A. (PETE) RODDA, CAE
ASSESSOR/COLLECTOR
HAROLD RENFRO,CMS
ASST. ASSESSOR

,
0.
Ui
C'am'
ALDON M. IDOL
REAL [STATE
N. DELBERT LAUTEN, JR.
PERSONAL PROPERTY
RICHARD L. DAVIS, CMS
GIS/MAPPING
ASSESSOR'S OFFICE
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN
THE ATTACHED LIST(S) CONTAIN THE IDENTIFIERS, OWNERS, AND OWNERS' ADDRESSES
ACCORDING TO TAX OFFICE RECORDS FOR THE SUBJECT AND ADJOINING PROPERTIES:
oaf ,,
THIS TI-IEcDAY OF ()d I9'
NUMBER OF ATTACHED SHEETS t?
or p
BY:
TAX OWNER : BRENDA G SMITH
: TOMMY R SMITH
Mail Add : 699 DEER TRACK LN
: PURLEAR , NC 28665-0000
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BLKLOT : 3984 028 STATUS: C
PROPERTY Add : 2851 EDDYSTONE LN
TAX OWNER : LLOYD MARTIN SMITH
Mail Add : 2851 EDDYSTONE LN
: WINSTON-SALEM , NC 27103-5419
------------------------------------------------------------------- ,------------
BLKLOT : 3984 031 STATUS: C
PROPERTY Add : 2901 EDDYSTONE LN
TAX OWNER : JERRY LEON SMITH
Mail Add : 2901 EDDYSTONE LN
: WINSTON-SALEM , NC 27103-5421
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BLKLOT : 4028 020 STATUS: C
PROPERTY Add : 2911 SPRINGHAVEN DR
TAX OWNER : CHARLES R STUMP
: SARAH STUMP
Mail Add : 2911 SPRINGHAVEN DR
: WINSTON-SALEM NC 27103-5454
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BLKLOT : 4028 021D STATUS: C ADDLOTS: 021F
PROPERTY Add : 2550 CREEKWOOD DR
TAX OWNER : EARL G YOUNG
: HEIDI YOUNG
Mail Add : 2550 CREEKWOOD DR
: WINSTON-SALEM , NC 27103-5462
------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------
BLKLOT : 6197 001 STATUS: C ADDLOTS: 002
PROPERTY Add : 950 HANES MALL BLVD
TAX OWNER : FIRST SECURITY BANK OF UTAH
care of : TRUSTEE FOR PET STORES TRUST
Mail Add : 19601 N 27TH AVE
: PHOENIX , AZ 85027-4008
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BLKLOT : 6373 003 STATUS: F
PROPERTY Add : 100 HANES SQUARE CIR
NEW OWNER : PRIMAX PROPERTIES LLC
Mail Add : 1115 E MOREHEAD•ST
: CHARLOTTE , NC 28204-0000
------------- 7-----------=--------------------------------------------------
BLKLOT : 6373 004 STATUS: F
PROPERTY Add 110 HANES SQUARE CIR
NEW OWNER,
care of :
Mail Add - Pn z ? 1011-ce ,, ... ^ l `rl (?
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - , - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ?- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
BLKLOT : 6373 005 STATUS: F
PROPERTY Add : 120 HANES SQUARE CIR
NEW OWNER : MICHAEL NEILL PROPERTIES LLC
care of : MANNER STATION
Mail Add - POBox: 25107 Route: Box:
WINSTQN-SALEM , NC 27114-5107
tsysdate: 19990925
4

*******************************************************************************
**** THE SUBJECT PROPERTY LIST **** PRINT DATE: 01-OCT-1999
BLKLOT : 3901 030C STATUS: C ADDLOTS: 114
PROPERTY Add : 0 HANES MALL BLVD
TAX OWNER EUGENIA S DULL - ETAL
care of LUCY DONADIO
Mail Add 5925 ARDEN DR
CLEMMONS NC 27012-9407
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BLKLOT : 3901 033A STATUS: C
PROPERTY Add : 0 BECKWOOD DR
TAX OWNER : REBECCA A BAIRD - ETAL
Mail Add : 917 WOODCREST DR
: ROYAL OAK , MI 48067-1617
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BLKLOT : 3901 033B STATUS: C
PROPERTY Add : 0 BECKWOOD DR
TAX OWNER : EUGENIA S ET AL DULL - ETAL
care of : LUCY DONADIO
Mail Add : 5925 ARDEN DR
: CLEMMONS , NC 27012-9407
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BLKLOT : 3901 034 STATUS: C
PROPERTY Add : 2800 EDDYSTONE LN
TAX OWNER JAYNE RUSSELL SOMMER
Mail Add 2800 EDDYSTONE LN
WINSTON-SALEM , NC 27103-5420
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BLKLOT : 3901 035C STATUS: C ADDLOTS: 035H
PROPERTY Add : 2830 EDDYSTONE LN
TAX OWNER EUGENIA S DULL
care of LUCY DONADIO
Mail Add 5925 ARDEN DR
CLEMMONS , NC 27012-9407
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BLKLOT : 3901 035F STATUS: C
PROPERTY Add : 0 EDDYSTONE LN
TAX OWNER EUGENIA S DULL
care of LUCY DONADIO
Mail Add 5925 ARDEN DR
CLEMMONS , NC 27012-9407
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BLKLOT : 3901 102A STATUS: C
PROPERTY Add 0 CREEKWOOD DR
TAX OWNER : EUGENIA S DULL
Eugenia S. Dull, et al Rebecca A. Baird, et al Jayne Russell Sommer
c/o Lucy Donadio 917 Woodcrest Dr 2800 Eddystone Ln
5925 Arden Dr Royal Oak, MI 48067-1617 Winston-Salem, NC 27103-5420
Clemmons, NC 27012-9407
Brenda G. Smith
Tommy R. Smith
699 Deer Track Ln
Purlear, NC 28665-0000
Lloyd Martin Smith
2851 Eddystone Ln
Winston-Salem, NC 27103-5419
Jerry Leon Smith
2901 Eddystone Ln
Winston-Salem, NC 27103-5454
Charles R. Stump
Sarah Stump
2911 Springhaven Dr
Winston-Salem, NC 27103-5454
Primax Properties LLC
1115 E. Morehead St
Charoltte, NC 28204-0000
Earl G. Young
Heidi Young
2550 Creekwood Dr
Winston-Salem, NC 27103-5462
Michael Neill Properties LLC
Manner Station
P.O. Box 25107
Winston-Salem, NC 27114-5107
First Security Bank of Utah
c/o Trustee for Pet Stores Trust
19601 N. 27'x' Ave '
Phoenix, AZ 85027-4008
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
e
I?DENR :.
Certified Mail P-536 308 480
JAMES B. HUNTJR. Return Receipt Requested
WINSTON-SALEM REGIONAL OFFICE
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
November 4,1999
GOVERNOR
Mr. Don W. Garner
Isakson-Barnhart
25 Technology Parkway South, Suite 201
Norcross, Georgia 30092
SUBJECT: Request for Additional Information
Hanes Mall Boulevard, Winston-Salem Site
DW P t # 991172
as I _
CIO

Q roJec ??a 2 ffC4
Forsyth County 0 d
Dear Mr. Garner:
The Division of Water Quality has reviewed your plans for the discharge of fill
material into 867 feet of a stream channel and 0.32 acres of wetlands located at Hanes
Mall Boulevard, Winston-Salem, Forsyth County, for the construction of commercial
property. Insufficient evidence is present in our files to conclude that your project
must be built as planned in waters and/or wetlands in accordance with 15A NCAC 2H
.0506. Therefore, unless modifications of the proposal are made as described below,
we will have to move toward denial of your 401 Certification as required by 15A
NCAC 2H .0507(e) and will place this project on hold as incomplete until we receive
this additional information. We are requesting (by copy of this letter) that the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers place your project on administrative hold.a
v
(1) Since the proposed impacts are greater that 500 linear feet, please A
contact the USACOE for instructions regarding applying for an Individual Permit.
(2) Please include the impacts to all jurisdictional waters. Specifically, the
headwaters of the channel in Area II (from the Lowe's Parking Lot culvert downstream
to the established knickpoint of the Duke Power lines) must be included as impact,
even though mitigation is not required. It is also the understanding of this Office that,
based on the 2/12/99 site visit, this area was to be delineated for the presence of
riparian wetlands. Your wetland delineation map does not show if this area had been
investigated for the presence of wetlands.
(3) For Area I, the USACOE called this drainage jurisdictional waters with
'.f a square footage requirement. However, NCDENR-DWQ utilizes only linear footage
for stream channels (mitigatable or not). Therefore, for the sections of this channel
r , noted as "waters impact", please determine the linear footage of impact.
G

OL INA 27107
SSS WAUGHTOWN STREET, WINSTON-SALEM, NORTH AR
PHONE [phone] FAX[phone]
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/10% POST-CONSUMER PAPER
Isakson-Barnhart
Page 2
(4) If the delineated wetland in Area III (0.02 acres) is to be impacted and the
Corps determined it jurisdictional, please include this with the total acreage of impact.
(5) It is mentioned in your application that "... no disturbed offsite areas were
determined to be suitable for wetland restoration or creation." Please provide
documentation as to how and where sites were investigated and why they are not suitable.
Please respond within three weeks of the date of this letter by sending a copy of
this information to me and one copy to John R. Dorney, 4401 Reedy Creek Road,
Raleigh, NC 27607. If we do not hear from you in three weeks, we will assume that you
no longer want to pursue this project and we will consider the project as withdrawn. If
you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Mrs. Jennifer Frye or myself
at [phone].
Sincerely,

Larry D. Coble
WQ Regional Supervisor
cc: Williamsburg Environmental Group, Inc.
Raleigh Field Office, US Army Corps of Engineers
Wilmington Office, US Army Corps of Engineers
Wetlands/401 Unit Central Office
Central Files
WSRO

i
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: Jennifer Frve
Non-Discharge Branch WO Supervisor: 1 arry Coble
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Isakson-Barnhard County Forsyth
Project Number 99 1172 County2
Recvd From APP Region Winston-Salem
Received Date 10/20/99 Recvd By Region 10/26/99
Project Type Commercial
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet " - -
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req. = mi
1 - ? O Y O N 1__ 12-94-11 F -cF-- 30,704. 0.39 F- ?-
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y 0 N Did you request more info? Q Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? 0 Y 0 N
Recommendation: 0 Issue 0 Issue/Cond 0 Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 36° 3' 50" Longitude (ddmmss) 80° 19' 00"
Comments:
ON NOl Q LETTER SENT BY REGION ON 11/4/99 for the following reasons:
1. Propose impacts greater than 500 LF, need to re-apply for IP.
2 Did not include all impacts to jurisdictional waters. (only the mitiaatable waters)
3 Used square footage instead of linear footage for intermittent channel-
4 Did not include a delineated wetland with total acreage to be imparted.
ti Did not sufficiently provide documentation that they investigated the possibility of off-site
cc: Regional Office Page Number 1
Central Office
Eility Name Isakson-Barnhard
!ct Number 99 1172
mments (continued from page 1):
County Forsyth
Regional Contact: Jennifer Frye
Date:
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 2
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: Jennifer Frye
Non-Discharge Branch WO Supervisor: 1 arw Cable
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name Isakson-Barnhard County Forsyth
Project Number 99 1172 County2
Recvd From APP Region Winston-Salem
Received Date 10/20/99 Recvd By Region 10/26/99
Project Type Commercial
Certificates Stream Stream Impacts (ft.)
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
F_ O Y O N F_ 12-94-ll ?F 30,704. 0.39 F__ F_ ?-
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
P,/A ?n
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? O Y ON Did you request more info? OQ Y ON
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? O Y O N
Is Mitigation required? O Y O N Recommendation: O Issue O Issue/fond O Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) 36° 3' 50" Longitude (ddmmss) 80° 19' 00"
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Comments:
ON HOLD LETTER SENT BY REGION ON 11/4/99 for the following reasons:
cility Name Isakson-Barnhard County Forsyth
ct Number 99 1172 Regional Contact: Jennifer Frye
Date:
nments (continued from page 1):

cc: Regional Office Page Number 2
Central Office
TRONMENTAL
ROUP, INC.
Environmental Consultants
October 19, 1999
Mr. John Thomas
US Army Corps of Engineers
6508 Falls of the Neuse Road, Suite 120
Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
Re: Winston-Salem Site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Applicant: Mr. Donald W. Garner
Isakson-Barnhart
25 Technology Parkway South, Suite 201
Norcross, Georgia 30092
This correspondence will follow up our on-site meeting in January 1999 at a proposed
development site located in Winston=Salem, North Carolina. You may recall we visited the site
to examine waterways present on the property. The enclosed application contains a permit
support document with appendices, a wetlands confirmation, a stormwater management plan,
relevant maps and correspondence.
The construction of this development including the stormwater management facility will require
direct impacts to 0.32 acres of nontidal-forested headwater wetlands, 0.07 acres of other waters
of the U.S. and 867 linear feet of stream channel. The applicant has worked diligently to avoid
and minimize impacts to natural resources to the greatest extent practicable, however in this
instance, impacts to jurisdictional resources are unavoidable. In an effort to compensate for
permanent unavoidable impacts to wetlands and stream channel, the applicant is proposing to
mitigate these impacts through a contribution to the Wetlands Restoration Program (WRP).
On behalf of our client, the. Williamsburg Environmental Group, Inc. (WEG) respectfully
requests.that the Corps process this application. By copy of this correspondence, WEG also
requests that the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (NCDENR)
process the application. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at your
convenience. Thank you for your consideration in this matter.
Sincerely,
Charles R. Roadley, J .
Regulatory Specialist/Project Manager
Enclosure
cc: ?Mr. John Dorney, NCDENR w/ (7) copies
Mr. Donald W. Garner, Isakson-Barnhart
3000 Easter Circle Williamsburg, Virginia 23188 [phone] FAX [phone]
WILLm'MSI3UR'G
NVIRONMENTAL
ROUP, INC.
F Environmental"
COT 2 p : w
TRANSMITTAL LETTE
Wt TLR, 3D GNOIIP
luarGp.,?,..._
TO
Mr. John Dorney
NC Division of Water Quality
4401 Reedy Creek Road
Raleigh, NC 27607

DATE --..? -- .
October 19, 1999
RE
Winston-Salem Site
Permit Application
WE ARE SENDING ATTACHED UNDER SEPARATE COVER VIA
0 Plans Contracts D Letters PAYMENT
Prints 0 Literature Other: _ O cr% c?
Copies Samples 11CI?C VC
COPIES DATED DESCRIPTION
.7 October 1999 Winston-Salem Site, Permit Application
1, October 19, 1999 Permit Fee

THESE ARE BEING SENT:
As per your request = For your comments = For your signature
For your review = For your use/files 0 For your
NOTES Mr. Dorney:
Enclosed is a permit application for commercial development located in Winston-Salem, N.C.
I have previously met on-site with Ms. Jennifer Frye of the Winston-Salem office and discussed
various aspects of the project including the two stream segments involved. If you have
any questions, please give me a call.
COPY TO Is IGNA
Chuck Roadley,
3000 Easter Circle Williamsburg, lirginia 23188 (757) 220-6(
ec./Project Manager
FAX [phone]

0

1
1
V V ILLIAMSBURG
NVIRONMENTAL
?! ROUP, INC.
Environmental Consultants
1
C

u

u

Joint Permit Application and
Permit Support Document for
Winston-Salem Site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
prepared for:
Isakson-Barnhart
25 Technology Parkway South, Suite 201
Norcross, Georgia 30092

prepared by:
' Williamsburg Environmental Group, Inc.
3000 Easter Circle
' Williamsburg, Virginia 23188
[phone]
WEG40961
1 October 1999
1
1

I
n

n

i
1
1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................1
2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ..........................................................................4
2.1 WATER RESOURCES ............................................................................................... 4
2.2 VEGETATION ............................................................................................................5
2.3 WILDLIFE ...............................................................................................................5
3.0 CULTURAL RESOURCES .................................................................................7
4.0 DEVELOPMENT OVERVIEW ..........................................................................8
4.1 DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVES .......................................................................... 8
4. 1.1 DEVELOPMENT ALT. # 1 ......................................................................... 9
4.1.2 DEVELOPMENT ALT. #2 ....................................................................... 10
4.1.3 ROADS ...................................................................................................... 10
4.1.4 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT .......................................................... 11
4.1.5 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ......................................................... 12
5.0 MITIGATION PLAN ..........................................................................................14
6.0 REGULATORY SUMMARY ...........................................................................16
7.0 REFERENCES ...................................................................................................18
APPENDIX A - Permit Application
APPENDIX B - Confirmation of Wetlands Delineation, dated August 18, 1995
APPENDIX C - Correspondence with U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
APPENDIX D - Stormwater Management Plan and Water Quality Assessment
APPENDIX E - Site Photographs
ii

r

0
0
J

J

1

LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE PAGE
1-1 Project Vicinity Map .......................................................................................................... 2
1-2 Project Location Map ......................................................................................................... 3
Wetlands Map
Alternative #I Development Plan
Alternative #2 Development Plan (Selected Alternative)
LIST OF TABLES
TABLE
5-1 Selected Alternative Impact Summary..
iii
Map Pocket A
Map Pocket B
Map Pocket C
................................ 17

n

n

n

11

u

n

0

1.0 INTRODUCTION
Isakson-Barnhart, the applicant for the 35-acre Winston-Salem Site, is proposing a
commercial retail center involving the construction of road infrastructure, utility line installation,
and commercial retail development. The proposed project is located in southwestern Winston-
Salem, North Carolina (Figure 1-1) along the southern lane of Hanes Mall Boulevard (Figure 1-
2). The property is bordered by Lowe's Home Center to the east, Hanes Mall Boulevard to the
north, residential development to the south, property currently under commercial development to
the west.
The proposed commercial development for this property has been carefully designed to
integrate the development into the landscape while providing long-term protection to water
quality. The plan calls for the construction of approximately 300,000 square feet of commercial
space as well as the construction of associated road and utility infrastructure. Impacts are
necessary in order to provide a suitable commercial pad and a required stormwater management
facility. Impacts to jurisdictional waters of the U. S., including wetlands, have been examined in
an effort to avoid and minimize these impacts to the maximum extent practicable while still
meeting the project purpose. Development alternatives were investigated including total
elimination of impacts, elimination of building square footage to minimize impacts, and redesign
of the stormwater management facility. The applicant has worked to develop the site in a manner
acceptable to the City of Winston Salem.
In accordance with the regulatory agencies' procedures, Isakson-Barnhart, the applicant,
is submitting this application for review and approval of the proposed development (Appendix
A). This document has been prepared to accompany the application and provide more detail of
the proposed project than is possible within the format of the application itself.
1

n

J

0
n
1

i
7L== NO
2.4 MILES 12 0 MILES 1.4 MILES
SCALE. I INCH . 2.4 MILES
SOURCE: NORTH CAROLINA ATLAS AND GAZETTEER
PsLORME MAPPING CO., 19%.
ROUP, INC.
FIGURE i - i
PROJECT VICINITY MAP
WINSTON-SALEM SITE
WINSTON-SALEM, N.C.I OCTOBER 1999

u

u

71= 6
2000' 1000' of 2000'
SCALE: I INCH ¦ 2000 FEET
LATITUDE: 36.3'50°
LONGITUDE: 80'19'00°
SOURCE: USGS 1.5 MINUTE SERIES TOPOGRAPHIC MAP,
WINSTON-SALEM WEST, N.C. QUADRANGLE, 1950.
REVISED 1994
, INC.
FIGURE 1-2
PROJECT LOCATION MAP
WINSTON-SALEM SITE
WINSTON-SALEM, N.C.I OCTOBER 1999

n
u

n

1

0

2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
The regulatory review process is based on the assessment of the potential environmental
impacts expected, to occur as a result of the proposed project. In order to facilitate the review of
this project, an environmental characterization of the project area has been completed. This
section provides a general environmental overview of the project area and specifically discusses
environmental parameters that are pertinent to the permitting process. This section was written
utilizing information from a variety of correspondence, reports, and studies including wetland
investigations conducted by the Williamsburg Environmental Group, Inc. (WEG).
2.1 WATER RESOURCES
Aquatic habitats present on the property consist primarily of palustrine forest associated
with the headwater areas located within the Little Creek drainage basin. The water bodies
situated within the immediate project area consist primarily of two nontidal headwater drainages
that flow south to north into existing culverts under Hanes Mall Boulevard. The western
drainage on the property (Area I) consists of an intermittent stream/forested-headwater wetland
(Photo 1) with an on-site drainage area of approximately 14 acres and off-site drainage area of
approximately 8 acres. Drainage within this area flows into a 42-inch culvert at Hanes Mall
Boulevard (Photo 2). The eastern drainage (Area Il) is somewhat larger with an on-site drainage
area of approximately 25 acres and off-site drainage area of approximately 10 acres (Photos 3 &
4). Drainage within this section of the project enters the property from two culverts, one under
Hanes Mall Boulevard and a second culvert entering the property from the adjacent Lowe's
Home Center. Waters with this drainage flow through the project area and into a 54-inch culvert
' under Hanes Mall Boulevard (Photo 5). Neither of these systems are classified as critical
resource waters or trout waters. The stream segment within Area H has essentially been isolated
' by existing development on adjoining parcels. In addition, this development continues to
degrade on-site resources and would be expected to continue even in the absence of the proposed
development. This was made apparent with the erosion of 0.02 acres of wetlands within Area II
since the site was confirmed in 1995 and the appearance of degraded stream conditions including
' eroding banks with exposed root material and evidence of increasing sediment deposition.

n
n

n

FIJI

D

t

L

F

I

r

Jurisdictional waters of the U.S., including wetlands, present within the entire parcel
were delineated by WEG ecologists in accordance with the Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory, 1987). Wetland flags were placed in the field
by WEG to provide an onsite record of the location of jurisdictional areas. The Corps confirmed
this delineation on August 18, 1995. The jurisdictional limits are shown on the plans within Map
Pocket A and the confirmation letter is included within Appendix B.
Dominant vegetation within the forested wetlands includes red maple (Acer rubrum),
sweetgum (Liquidambar styrac j7ua), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), and poison ivy
(Toxicodendron radicans).
2.2 VEGETATION
The project site,is situated within the Eastern Deciduous Forest Province as described by
Gleason & Cronquist (1964). The mixed hardwood forest typical of this province is comprised
of a diverse community, which contains over two dozen hardwood species, intermixed with
stands of pine. Upland immature hardwood forests represent the majority of the vegetation
community type in the project area, however, there are some scattered mature hardwoods. The
most commonly occurring species in the subcanopy within this forest community included sweet
gum (Liquidambar styraciflua), red maple (Acer rubrum), and tulip tree (Liriodendron
tulipifera). Other accessory species of the subcanopy included sycamore (Platanus occidentalis),
Virginia pine (Pinus virginiana) and green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica).
The shrub layer consists of tree saplings in addition to common privet (Liqustrum
vulgare) and dogwood (Corpus jlorida). The sparse herbaceous stratum of this community
consists of Christmas fern (Polystichum acrostichoides), poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans),
Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica), greenbriar (Smilax sp.), Virginia creeper
(Parthenocissus quinquefolia) and violet (Viola sp.).
1 2.3 WILDLIFE

Wildlife is dependent upon the habitat in which they thrive. The vegetation communities
discussed above provide habitat for a variety of wildlife species. Some of the wildlife species
typically encountered in such forest habitat of this region include gray squirrel (Sciurus
5

0
F

n

' carolinensis), white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), Virginia opossum (Didelphis virginia),
Eastern chipmunk (Tamias striatus), Raccoon (Procyon lotor), Groundhog (Marmota monax),
Striped skunk (Mephitis mephitis), Eastern cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus), Eastern box turtle
(Terrapene carolina), Northern copperhead (Agkistrodon contotrix), Northern black snake
' (Coluber constrictor), American crow (Corvus brabchyrhynchos), Northern cardinal (Cardinalis
cardinalis), Carolina wren (Thryothorus ludovicianus), Pileated woodpecker (Dryocopus
' pileatus), and the blue jay (Cyanocilta cristata).
' Of the numerous threatened and endangered wildlife species listed by the U.S Fish &
Wildlife Service (FWS) and the North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
' Resources (NCDENR) that occur in North Carolina, no Federally listed threatened or endangered
species have been reported on the project site. However, FWS records indicate that there are
' records of bog turtles (Clemmys muhlenbergii) within approximately 4.0 miles southeast of the
project site. The bog turtle is not listed but is placed under "threatened due to similar
' appearance" status (see correspondence, Appendix Q.

n

u

0

Fj

n

I I
u

u
I
L

1 3.0 CULTURAL RESOURCES
' A search of the National Register Listings of Historic Places in North Carolina database
revealed no historic sites within the project vicinity.
CIS
n

,7

I

u

0
n
f

n

n
u
I I
n

0
0

E
I I

4.0 DEVELOPMENT OVERVIEW
The development plan for this Winston-Salem site includes the construction of
approximately 300,000 square feet of commercial retail space, associated access roads, and a
required stormwater management facility. The planning for this site sought to avoid and
minimize impacts to wetlands and other waters of the United States, as well as other sensitive
and/or valuable natural resources located on, or in the vicinity of, the project site. Site
constraints, however, limit potential development configurations. These constraints include the
presence of jurisdictional wetlands and other waters of the United States, project boundaries,
topography, and stormwater management requirements. Taking the project requirements and
' environmental constraints into consideration, a land plan was prepared which attempted to
minimize environmental impacts to the greatest extent possible. The site is severely constrained

r
[J
11
u
iL

?7

by existing topography and resource areas within the northern portion of the project. In
examining practicable development scenarios, the applicant evaluated the potential for avoidance
of these resource areas within the context of the project goals and objectives. The option of
reducing commercial area was also investigated. This option, however, was ultimately
eliminated from consideration due to economic reasons. Further decreasing the amount of
proposed building square footage on the project site is not possible due to the applicant's need to
make an acceptable return on investment.
4.1 DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVES
Two primary development alternatives were evaluated using the most efficient
preliminary layout possible given the property size, the market demands along the Hanes Mall
Boulevard corridor, the wetlands and other waters on the site and the location of the proposed
stormwater management facility (BMP). In Alternative #l, aquatic resources were partially
avoided (Map Pocket B). While this represents a reduction in direct impacts, we recognized that
construction activity in this area would result in fragmentation, hydrologic alteration and
possibly the erosion or siltation of the remaining wetlands and other waters of the U.S.
Ultimately, the secondary impacts would result in the loss of wetland functions in this area and a
permit modification would be required to address these impacts. In Alternative #2 (the Selected
Alternative, Map Pocket C), the plan incorporates the wetlands and waters that would have a
8

F

0

E
E

I
E

0

I
n

[I
11
n
11

n
n
u
L

high probability of being inadvertently impacted during construction even under the avoidance
scenario developed in Alternative #1.
4. 1.1 Development Alternative #I
The Development Alternative #1 in Map Pocket B depicts a conceptual buildout of the
property with the goal of avoiding and minimizing direct impacts to wetlands and other waters of
the United States. Where possible, building footprints were located outside of jurisdictional
areas and impacts to jurisdictional resources adjacent to Hanes Mall Boulevard were avoided. In
addition, the majority of the drainageway and floodplain for Area 11 was placed in open space,
thus preserving the natural vegetation and wildlife habitat in these areas. The plan sought to
preserve existing stream channel and incorporate a 30-foot buffer adjoining this stream segment.
In addition, wetland impacts associated with the stormwater management pond in Area I were
minimized.
Total impacts resulting from this plan include approximately 160 linear feet of stream
channel, 0.18 acres of wetlands and 0.06 acres of other waters of the U.S. This plan eliminates
virtually all commercial development potential fronting Hanes Mall Boulevard. The steep
topography adjoining the stream combined with limited upland area adjoining Hanes Mall
Boulevard precludes development within this section of the project under the avoidance scenario.
Concurrent with plan development, an evaluation of alternative stormwater management
facility designs was conducted by Freeland & Kauffinan, Inc. to arrive at a feasible plan that
meets the requirements of the City of Winston Salem, Forsyth County and NCDENR. Upon
further evaluation, it was determined that the size of the conceptual storm water management
facility proposed in this plan was not adequate. Additional impacts would be required in order to
meet water quality standards and peak flow attenuation.
The development layout must include the commercial development along the Hanes Mall
Boulevard corridor. Limiting development along this corridor in a manner inconsistent with
existing adjacent developed areas not only limits total return but also has a negative influence on
the remaining commercial area proposed for this site. A great deal of effort was put forth to
reduce impacts associated with site development and specifically within the Area II stream
9
I I

E
1?
n
u

I?

0
0

u

segment. With the exception of one road crossing in this area, maximum avoidance was
evaluated but determined to be an impracticable alternative considering the economic impact
such a reduction in commercial space would have on the overall return on this project. In
addition, WEG considered the probable secondary impacts to jurisdictional resources that might
occur even under strict erosion and sediment control. Given the topography of the site, we
anticipate continued degradation of jurisdictional resources beyond that which has occurred from
adjoining development activities. As such, this alternative was dropped from further
consideration.
1

H

11?

4.1.2 Development Alternative #2 (Selected Alternative)
Development Alternative #2 (Map Pocket C) represents the selected alternative, which is
the most realistic development scenario for the Winston-Salem site. The proposed impacts are
unavoidable due to the limited space available to meet the project's purpose. This plan
incorporates the wetlands and waters that would have a high probability of being inadvertently
impacted during construction even under the avoidance scenario developed in Alternative # 1.
This plan includes the implementation of a stormwater management facility that will
enhance post-development water quality before waters leave the site. In addition, up-front
recognition of the effects of development on wetlands and other waters in this area will allow for
compensation for all impacts at one time, rather than incorporating secondary impact areas into a
permit modification several years after the commencement of construction. Total impacts
resulting from this plan include approximately 867 linear feet of stream channel, 0.32 acres of
wetlands and 0.07 acres of other waters of the U.S. The following sections describe this
alternative in greater detail.
4.1.3 Roads
u
I

This development involves the construction of a main access road to the interior of the
development, a secondary access point off of Hanes Mall Boulevard, and lateral connections to
adjoining parcels along Hanes Mall Boulevard. The proposed 35-acre development involves the
construction of one main. access at the existing intersection of Westgate Center Boulevard and
Hanes Mall Boulevard. This access point will utilize existing traffic control on Hanes Mall
10

7

J
J

Boulevard and serve as the primary point for ingress and egress from the project. Secondary
access will be provided approximately 560 feet west along Hanes Mall Boulevard. This
secondary access will not include a median break on Hanes Mall Boulevard or traffic control.
Each of these intersections provides a critical link for the flow of traffic through the development
and incorporate traffic safety considerations. Ancillary access is proposed to adjoining parcels
via connector roads extending east and west of the project site.
Within the Winston-Salem development, 160 linear feet of waters (Area 11) and 435
square feet of other waters of the United States associated with Area I will be unavoidably
impacted by roadway crossings. The City of Winston Salem is requiring access through the
development to the rear of the commerce center along the Westgate Center corridor. This is
designed to provide access to the adjoining parcel and will serve as the primary access point for
property that is not owned by the applicant. This dictates the alignment of the roadway and has
required additional modifications to the development plan that further reduced the commercial
area available along the rear of the property.
4.1.4 Commercial Development
I I

n

u
u

The development layout must include the commercial development along the Hanes Mall
Boulevard corridor. A great deal of effort has been put forth to reduce the impacts associated
with the commercial development and specifically within the stream segment in Area 11.
Avoidance was evaluated but determined to be an unacceptable alternative considering the
economic impact such a reduction in commercial space would have on both the overall return on
this project as well at the tax base to the city. Within the Winston-Salem development, 707
linear feet of waters (Area H) and 0.32 acres of waters of the United States associated with Area I
will be unavoidably impacted by the commercial area.
One of several contributing factors influencing the commercial development potential
along the Hanes Mall Boulevard corridor is the presence of the Duke Power Easement that
essentially bisects the project from east to west. While this might appear insignificant, this
limitation has a significant impact on the commercial layout. The need to develop a regional
complex and the resulting traffic patterns dictate that large block areas be utilized. The applicant
attempted to configure proposed development within various portions of the project site in an
11

J
n

u
0

u
' effort to minimize overall impacts to jurisdictional resources. Such alignments resulted in
fragmented development plans that did not achieve project goals or traffic safety requirements.
Alternative configurations were considered. The goal was to minimize impacts to
' jurisdictional resources while accommodating approximately 300,000 square feet of commercial
space. The conceptual alternatives directly impact 160 linear feet of stream channel (Area II),
' 0.18 acres of wetlands and 0.06 acres of other waters of the U.S the United States. While this
represents a reduction in direct impacts when compared with the selected alternative, we
t recognized that construction activity in this area would result in fragmentation, hydrologic
alteration and possibly the erosion or siltation of the remaining resources. Ultimately, the
' secondary impacts would result in the loss of aquatic resource functions in this area and a permit
modification would be required to address these impacts. As such, we felt it prudent to simply
' account for the impact and mitigate accordingly.
' 4.1.5 Stormwater Management
' The evaluation of alternative stormwater management facility design was conducted by
' Freeland & Kauffman, Inc. to arrive at a feasible plan that meets the requirements of the City of
Winston Salem, Forsyth County and NCDENR (Appendix D). The City of Winston Salem
requires that all new developments provide for stormwater to be retained/detained on-site and
' released at the pre-development rate. The City requires that the pond be designed to hold and
release the 10-year storm event.
The county requires that the site be designed to retain erosion and sediment. The
' requirements are based on the state standards for Best Management Practices (BMP's) and
require that the site be designed to have a minimum of 85% sediment removal. This can be
t accomplished by the use of silt fence, inlet protection, sediment traps, and sediment basins. The
proposed BMP is designed to handle the silt from the site by using a forebay to act as a settling
' basin before water flows into the main pond.
' The state will require water quality treatment prior to discharge into the existing culvert
under Hanes Mall Boulevard. The water quality treatment is accomplished by using a wet pond
12
u

n
u
F

n

' that allows for evaporation of constituents and also allows for settling of suspended solids. The
total development input to the proposed pond will be approximately 35 acres. The total area to
the pond includes 8.0 acres of offsite runoff to the south of the site. This area cannot be diverted
around the facility so it will be diverted to the pond. Existing inputs from the Lowe's Home
' Center will be directed around the site.
' The Stormwater Management Plan for the Winston-Salem site calls the construction of a
BMP structure with a 40,538 square foot surface area incorporating approximately 9,000 square
feet of vegetated wetlands. Impacts to jurisdictional resources associated with the structure
include approximately 0.02 acres of forested-headwater wetlands and 0.04 acres of intermittent
' stream channel. These impacts are necessary to attenuate peak flows and to provide treatment
for water quality before discharging into existing culverts.
Additional impacts to the environment will be minimized through the implementation of
' strict erosion and sedimentation control plan to include immediate soil and slope stabilization,
temporary sediment basins, silt fencing, and diversion dikes.
u

n
1

I I

13

n

_7
1

n

u

5

5.0

r

J

L
F

u
L

NMIGATION PLAN
The primary objective of mitigation for unavoidable impacts to jurisdictional wetlands
and other waters of the U.S. is to offset environmental losses, and in particular functional values
lost. WEG personnel met onsite with North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural
Resources (NCDENR) staff on February 12, 1999 for the purpose of stream evaluation. We
walked the two main drainages and evaluated the biological significance of each as it relates to
the need for compensatory mitigation. The NCDENR staff sampled for signs of aquatic life
along the downstream segment of Area I using a "D-frame" kick net. The stream segment
associate with Area I is a small drainage feature heavily incised in areas (Photo 1). life
forms indicative of a perennial system were found. NCDENR staff concluded that Area I stream
segments would not require linear foot mitigation. Area R was sampled from the downstream
54-inch culvert under Hanes Mall Boulevard to the upstream 48-inch culvert at the toe of fill
associated with the Lowe's Home Center parking lot. No fish were found, however, crayfish
were located along this stretch from the downstream culvert. up to the Duke
ENR staff
Power transmission lines cross the stre (Approximately 867 imdim
concluded that this stream section would requ' clujumvpensato epacts
exceed 150 linear feet.
WEG personn
el met onsite with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) on March 4,
1999 to determine the biological significance of the streams under the Corps' purview. A 36-
inch culvert under Hanes Mall Boulevard in the northeast corner of the property appears to have
increased inflows into the project site. This has resulted in the erosion of 0.02 acres of wetlands
previously associated with the Area 11 drainage (Photo 6). During this site inspection, the Corps
ruled this drainage, from its origin under Hanes Mall Boulevard to the confluence with the main
stem, as non jurisdictional. Otherwise, the Corps supported NCDENR findings that the main
stem of the Area H stream is jurisdictional and impacts greater than 150 linear feet would need to
mitigated on a linear foot basis. The Corps review of Area I stream segments indicated these
areas were jurisdictional, however, due to their small size they would be mitigated on a square
foot basis.
In an effort to adequately mitigate for the unavoidable impacts to 867 linear feet of
stream channel (Area 11), 0.32 acres of nontidal forested-headwater wetlands and 0.07 acres of
14
1

J

n
H
J

I
H

' other waters of the U.S. (Area I), the applicant investigated various compensation options
including onsite creation, offsite creation, and offsite preservation of significant or sensitive
' aquatic/wetland environments. The 0.07 acres of waters impacted in Area I should be adequately
compensated thought the creation 40,538 s.f. of ponded surface area within the proposed BMP.
' Onsite creation of wetlands, however, is not feasible due to the limited project size and severe
topography. A wetland creation ratio of 2:1 would require the excavation and planting of
' approximately 0.64 acres of forested wetlands and the creation of 867 linear feet of stream
channel. This project site will not support any kind of commercial development and such a
' mitigation compensation site. A review of adjacent properties revealed that most uplands are
either developed or are in the process of developing. In addition, no disturbed offsite areas were
' determined to be suitable for wetland restoration or creation. As such, the applicant proposes to
make a contribution to the Wetlands Restoration Program (WRP) in the amount of $123,735.00
(867 l.f. x $125.00 + 0.64 acres x $24,000), subject to Corps and NCDENR approval.

n

n

L
r
E

15

71

u

n
u
I I

6.0 REGULATORY SUMMARY
' Isakson-Barnhart, the applicant, is proposing to construct a commercial retail center
within a 35-acre tract of land in the City of Winston Salem, North Carolina. The development
' plan for this Winston-Salem site includes the construction of approximately 300,000 square feet
of commercial retail space, associated access roads, and a required stormwater management
' facility. The planning for this site sought to avoid and minimize impacts to wetlands and other
waters of the United States, as well as other sensitive and/or valuable natural resources located
' on, or in the vicinity of, the project site. Site constraints, however, limit potential development
configurations.
Two primary development alternatives were evaluated using the most efficient
' preliminary layout possible given the property size, the market demands along the Hanes Mall
Boulevard corridor, the wetlands and other waters on the site and the location of the proposed
' stormwater management facility (BMP). In Alternative #1, aquatic resources were partially
avoided (Map Pocket B). While this represents a reduction in direct impacts, we recognized that
construction activity in this area would result in fragmentation, hydrologic alteration and
possibly the erosion or siltation of the remaining wetlands and other waters of the U.S.
' Ultimately, the secondary impacts would result in the loss of wetland functions in this area and a
permit modification would be required to address these impacts. In Alternative #2 (Selected
' Alternative, Map Pocket C), the plan incorporates the wetlands and waters that would have a
high probability of being inadvertently impacted during construction even under the avoidance
' scenario developed in Alternative # 1.
' A great deal of effort was expended by the project team analyzing the development plan
to reduce direct impacts and account for all secondary impacts resulting from the project. Total
permanent impacts to jurisdictional waters are expected to be approximately 0.39 acres of
forested-headwater wetlands and intermittent stream channel and 867 linear feet of other waters
of the United States. The total impacts to jurisdictional areas proposed by the development plan
' are itemized in Table 6-1.

I I
1 16

I

u

n

n

I I
0
n

1

1 Table 6-1 Selected Alternative Impact Summary
F
I I
n
Wetland Waters Stream
Impact (Ac.) Impact (Ac.) Impact (L.F.)
Road 0.00 0.01 160
Commercial Area 0.30 0.02 707
BMP 0.02 0.04 0
Total Impacts 0.32 Ac. 0.07 Ac. 8671f
Of the numerous threatened and endangered wildlife species listed by the U.S Fish &
' Wildlife Service (FWS) and the NCDENR that occur in North Carolina, no Federally listed
threatened or endangered species have been reported on the project site.
In summary, the applicant has attempted to avoid and minimize impacts to jurisdictional
wetlands and other waters of the U.S. to the greatest extent practicable within the project site and
its vicinity. The site is severely constrained by existing topography and resource areas within the
northern portion of the project. In addition, existing development within adjoining parcels
continues to degrade on-site resources and would be expected to continue even in the absence of
the proposed development. This was made apparent with the erosion of 0.02 acres of wetlands
within Area H since the site was confirmed in 1995 and the appearance of degraded stream
' conditions including eroding banks with exposed root material and evidence of increasing
sediment deposition. In examining practicable development scenarios, the applicant evaluated
the potential for avoidance of these resource areas within the context of the project goals and
objectives. The option of reducing commercial area was also investigated. This option,
' however, was ultimately eliminated from consideration due to economic reasons. Further
decreasing the amount of proposed building square footage on the project site is not possible due
to the applicant's need to make an acceptable return on investment. As such, the applicant will
compensate for the permanent unavoidable impacts through a contribution to the Wetlands
Restoration Program (WRP), subject to Corps and NCDENR approval. This permit support
' document and the attached Application are submitted in support of the applicant's request for
Corps and NCDENR permit approval.
0
1 17

F",

H
0

n

Ll

7.0 REFERENCES
1
Gleason, Henry A. and Cronquist, Arthur, 1964. The Natural Geography of plants.
Columbia University Press, New York, 420 pp.
National Register Information System, 1999. On-line Service
' North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, 1999. Personal
Communication
' U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, January 1999. Personal Correspondence
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 1999. Personal Communication
1
n
I
n

u

18
L
J

n

C
L

J

I I
J

E

J

APPENDIX A
Permit Application
19

u

1

u

n
DEM ID: CORPS ACTION ID:
NATIONWIDE PERMIT REQUEST (PROVIDE NATIONWIDE PERMIT #):
' PRE-CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION APPLICATION
' FOR NATIONWIDE PERMITS THAT REQUIRE:
' 1) NOTIFICATION TO THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS
2) APPLICATION FOR SECTION 410 CERTIFICATION
3) COORDINATION WITH THE NC DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
SEND THE ORIGINAL AND (1) COPY OF THIS COMPLETED FROM TO THE APPROPRIATE FIELD OFFICE
' OF THE CORPS OF ENGINEERS (SEE AGENCY ADDRESS SHEET). SEVEN (7) COPIES SHOULD BE
SENT TO THE N.C. DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (SEE AGENCY ADDRESS SHEET).
PLEASE PRINT
1. OWNERS NAME: Isakson-Barnhart, c/o Mr. Don W. Garner
' 2. MAILING ADDRESS: 25 Technology Parkway South, Suite 201
SUBDIVISION NAME: Winston-Salem Site
CITY: Norcross STATE: Georgia ZIP CODE: 30092
' PROJECT LOCATION ADDRESS, INCLUDING SUBDIVISION NAME (IF DIFFERENT FROM MAILING
ADDRESS ABOVE): Hanes Mall Boulevard, Winston-Salem, N.C. adjacent to existing
' Lowe's Home Center
3. TELEPHONE NUMBER (HOME): (WORK): [phone]
' 4. IF APPLICABLE: AGENT'S NAME OR RESPONSIBLE CORPORATE OFFICAL,
ADDRESS, PHONE NUMBER: Williamsburg Environmental Group, Inc.
' 3000 Easter Circle
Williamsburg, Virginia 23188
5. LOACTION OF WORK (PROVIDE A MAP, PREFERABLY A COPY OF A USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP OR
' AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY WITH SCALE):
COUNTY: Forsyth NEAREST TOWN OR CITY: Winston-Salem
' SPECIFIC LOCATION (INCLUDINE ROAD NUMBERS, LANDMARKS, ETC.) From the
intersection of Stafford Road and Hanes Mall Boulevard, travel west on Hanes Mall
Boulevard approx 1/8 mile Subject property is located adjacent to Lowe's Home
Center.
' 6. IMPACTED OR NEAREST STREAM/RIVER: Unnamed Tributaries
RIVER BASIN: Little Creek
I?

n
IJ

H

u

n

0
n
u

7a. IS PROJECT LOACTED NEAR WATER CLASSIFIED AS TROUT, TIDAL SALTWATER (SA),
HIGH QUALITY WATERS (HQW), OUTSTANDING RESOURCE WATERS (ORW), WATER SUPPLY
WS- I OR WS-II)? YES [] NO [x ] IF YES, EXPLAIN
7b. IF THE PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN A NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
AREA OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN (AEC)? YES [ ] NO [x]
7c. IF THE PROJECT IS LOCATED WITHIN A COASTAL COUNTY (SEE PAGE 7 FOR LIST OF COASTAL
COUNTIES), WHAT IS THE LAND USE PLAN (LUP) DESIGNATION: N/A
8a. HAVE ANY SECTION 404 PERMITS BEEN PREVIOUSLY REQUESTED FOR USE ON THIS PROPERTY?
YES [ ]NO [x] IF YES, PROVIDE ACTION I.D. NUMBER OR PREVIOUS PERMIT AND ANY
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (INCLUDE PHOTOCOPY OF 410 CERTIFICATION):
8b. ARE ADDITIONAL PERMIT REQUESTS EXPECTED FOR THIS PROPERTY IN THE FUTURE?
YES [ ]NO [x] IF YES, DESCRIBE ANTICIPATED WORK:
9A. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES IN TRACT OF LAND:
35
9B. ESTIMATED TOTAL NUMBER OF ACRES OF WETLANDS LOCATED ON PROJECT SITE: 0.32
i

10A. NUMBER OF ACRES OW WETLANDS IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT BY:
FILLING: 0.32 EXCAVATION:
FLOODING: OTHER:
DRAINAGE: TOTAL ACRES TO BE IMPACTED:
10B. (1) STREAM CHANNEL TO BE IMPACTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT (IF RELOCATED, PROVIDE
' DISTANCE BOTH BEFORE AND AFTER RELOACTION):
LENGTH BEFORE: 867 FT AFTER: FT
' WIDTH BEFORE (based on normal high water contours): 4-7 FT
WIDTH AFTER: FT
AVERAGE DEPTH BEFORE: .5 FT AFTER: FT
' (2) STREAM CHANNEL IMPACTS WIL L RESULT FROM: (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY)
OPEN CHANNEL RELOCATION: PLACEMENT OF PIPE IN CHANNEL: x
' CHANNEL ELEVATION: CONSTRUCTION OF A DAM/FLOODING:
OTHER:

0.32

n

I

n
u

h
11. IF CONSTRUCTION OF A POND IS PROPOSED, WHAT IS THE SIZE OF THE WATERSHED DRAINING
TO THE POND? 38 acres POND SURFACE AREA?.
12. WHAT IS THE EXPECTED POND SURFACE AREA? 40,538 sf
13. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED WORK INCLUDING DISCUSSION OF TYPE OF MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT
TO BE USED (ATTACH PLANS: 81/2" X11" DRAWINGS ONLY: The proposed project
involves commercial retail development. The proposed impacts result fill
activities associated with site development.
13. PURPOSE OF PROPOSED WORK: Commercial Development
14. STATE REASONS WHY IT IS BELIEVED THAT THIS ACTIVITY MUST BE CARRIED OUT IN
WETLANDS. (INCLUDE ANY MEASURES TAKEN TO MINIMIZE WETLAND IMPACTS): Two primary
development alternatives were evaluated using the most efficient preliminary
layout possible given the property size, the market demands along the Hanes Mall
Boulevard corridor, the wetlands and other waters on the site and the location of
the proposed stormwater management facility (BMP). In Alternative #1, aquatic
resources were partially avoided (Map Pocket B). While this represents a
reduction in direct impacts, we recognized that construction activity in this
area would result in fragmentation, hydrologic alteration and possibly the
erosion or siltation of the remaining wetlands and other waters of the U.S.
Ultimately, the secondary impacts would result in the loss of wetland functions
in this area and a permit modification would be required to address these
impacts. In Alternative #2 (Selected Alternative, Map Pocket C), the plan
incorporates the wetlands and waters that would have a high probability of being
inadvertently impacted during construction even under the avoidance scenario
developed in Alternative #1. The site is severely constrained by existing
topography and resource areas within the northern portion of the project. In
examining practicable development scenarios, the applicant evaluated the
potential for avoidance of these resource areas within the context of the project
goals and objectives. The option of reducing commercial area was also
investigated. This option, however, was ultimately eliminated from consideration
due to economic reasons. Further decreasing the amount of proposed building
square footage on the project site is not possible due to the applicant's need to
make an acceptable return on investment.
15. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE (USFWS) AND/OR
NATINAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE (NMFS) (SEE AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET) REGARDING
THE PRESENCE OF ANY FEDERALLY LISTED OR PROPOSED FOR LISTING ENDANGERED OR
TREATENED SPECIES OR CRITICAL HABITAT IN THE PERMIT AREA THAT MAY BE AFFECTED BY
THE PROPOSED PROJECT.
DATE CONTACTED: January 7, 1999 (ATTACH RESPONSES FROM THESE AGENCIES.)

F

n

F

L-'

u

16. YOU ARE REQUIRED TO CONTACT THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICER (SHPO) (SEE
AGENCY ADDRESSES SHEET) REGARDING THE PRESENCE OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES IN THE
PERMIT AREA WHICH MAY BE AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED PROJECT.
DATE CONTACTED: Conducted search of the National Register of Historic Places
17. DOES THE PROJECT INVOLVE AN EXPENDITURE OF PUBLIC FUNDS OF THE USE OF PUBLIC
(STATE) LAND? YES [ ] NO [x] (IF NO, GO TO 18)
a. IF YES, DOES THE PROJECT REQUIRE PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT
PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT?
YES [ ] NO [ ]
b. IF YES, HAS THE DOCUMENT BEEN REVIEWED THROUGH THE NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT
OF ADMINISTRATION STATE CLEARINGHOUSE? YES [ ) NO [ ]
IF ANSWER TO 17b IS YES, THEN SUBMIT APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION FROM THE STATE
CLEARINGHOUSE TO DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH THE
NORTH CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT.
QUESTIONS REGARDING THE STATE CLEARINGHOUSE REVIEW PROCESS SHOULD BE DIRECTED TO MS.
CHRYS BAGGETT, DIRECTOR STATE CLEARINGHOUSE, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ADMINISTRATION, 116 WEST JONES STREET, RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27603-8003, TELEPHONE
[phone].
F
f

F-1

n

n
fl
18. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SHOULD BE INCLUDED WITH THIS APPLICATION IF PROPOSED ACTIVITY
INVOLVES THE DISCHARGE OF EXCAVATED OR FILL MATERIAL INTO WETLANDS:
a. WETLAND DELINEATION MAP SHOWING ALL WETLANDS, STREAMS, LAKES AND PONDS ON THE
PROPERTY (FOR NATIONWIDE PERMIT NUMBERS 14, 18, 21, 26, 29, AND 38). ALL
STREAMS (INTERMITTENT AND PERMANENT) ON THE PROPERTY MUST BE SHOWN ON THE MAP.
MAP SCALES SHOULD BE 1 INCH EQUALS 50 FEET OR 1 INCH EQUALS 100 FEET OR THEIR
EQUIVALENT.
b. IF AVAILABLE, REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOGRAPH OF WETLANDS TO BE IMPACTED BY PROJECT.
c. IF DELINEATION WAS PERFORMED BY A CONSULTANT, INCLUDE ALL DATA SHEETS RELEVANT
TO THE PLACEMENT OF THE DELINEATION LINE.
d. ATTACH A COPY OF THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN IF REQUIRED.
e. WHAT IS LAND USE OR SURROUNDING PROPERTY? Commercial
f. IF APPLICABLE, WHAT IS PROPOSED METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL? N/A
g. SIGNED AND DATED BY AGENT AUTHROIZATION LETTER, IF APPLICABLE. See attached

n

n
n

11

I I
i?
E

L
C

I?

NOTE: WETLANDS OR WATERS OF THE U.S. MAY NOT BE IMPACTED PRIOR TO:
1) ISSUANCE OF A SECTION 404 CORPS OF ENGINEERS PERMIT, AND
2) EITHER THE ISSUANCE OR WAIVER OF A 401 DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
(WATER QUALITY) CERTIFICATION.
OWNER'S%AGENT'S
(AGENT'S SIGNAT
IF AUT14ORIZATI
THE OWNER IS R
IGNATURE
E VALID ONLY
LETTER FROM
IED (18G.))
October 15, 1999
DATE

L

n

C

E

F

C

J

L

AGENT CERTIFICATION OF AUTHORIZATION
I Mr. Donald W. Garner hereby certify that I have authorized Williamsburg Environmental Group, Inc.
[Applicant's Name] (Agent's Name)
to act on my behalf and take all actions necessary to the processing, issuance, acceptance of this permit and
any and all standard and special conditions attached.
We hereby certify that the ' fo tion submitted in this application is true and accurate the best of our
knowledge.
k "'e000,
APPLICANT'S SIGNATURE AGENT'S SIGNAA(RE
V5 4fzj
DATE DATE
n

I

C

1

n

?J

n

APPENDIX B

IJ

Confirmation of Wetlands Delineation
Dated August 15, 1995
20

I

1

n

RECEIVED
AUG 2 8 1995 U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS
' Wilmington District co'pr
wmss?g ??ment? ?
' Action ID:f County: r
Notification of Jurisdictional Determination

Property owner/Authorized Agent o-t,,t 41 0 V1 *-_ez 'e (? (!/ e eI ?Y
Address C D ?^ S S• 3
Q ! G
dtl c?
`n L l *731
Telephone Number
Size and Location of Property water 'ghway name/number, town, etc.)
3 c/?a ra v a r7ef 3441
r.
Gf 'I: ,W ke C'/X.0/Y Wr 1.r 7i.c, ??.,. ;9"" Indicate Which of the following apply:

• There are wetlands on the above described property which we strongly suggest should be delineated and
surveyed. The surveyed wetland lines must be verified by our staff before the Corps will make a final
jurisdictional determination on your property.
• Because of the size of your property and our present workload, our identification and delineation of your
wetlands cannot be accomplished in a timely manner. You may wish to employ a consultant to obtain a
more timely delineation of the wetlands. Once your consultant has flagged a wetland line on the property,
Corps staff will review it, and, if it is accurate, we strongly recommend that you have the line surveyed for
final approval by the Corps. The Corps will not make a final jurisdictional determination on your property
without an approved survey.
The wetlands on your lot have been delineated, and the limits of Corps jurisdiction have been explained
to you. Unless there is a change in the law or our published regulations, this determination may be relied
upon for a period not to exceed t>.c years from the date of this notification.
• There are no wetlands present onthe above described property which are subject to the permit
requirements of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1344). Unless there is a change in the law
or our published regulations, this determination may be relied upon for a period not to exceed three years
from the date of this notification.
• The project is located in one of the 20 Coastal Counties. You should contact the nearest State Office of
Coastal Management to determine their requirements.
Placement of dredged or fill material in wetlands on this property without a Department of the Army
permit is in most cases a violation of Section 301 of the Clean Water Act (33 USC 1311). A permit is
not required for work on the property restricted entirely to existing high ground. If you have any
questions regarding the Corps of Engineers regulato ropmmi, please contact
J0hh 74 ma.I at Y/? [?! g ! 'e ?S
Property owner/Authorized Agent
Project Manager Signature ?
Date /Expiration Date G U
SURVEY LAT OR FIELD SKETCH OF DESCRIBED PROPERIOY' D THE WETLA#
DELINEATION FORM MUST BE ATTACHED TO THE YELLOW (FILE) COPY OF THIS FORV-
CFSAw Foam S"
I ocr9z

u

J

u

L7-

0

I
J
n

APPENDIX C
Correspondence from the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Survey
Dated January 7, 1999
21
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
U

CI
J

v r??
FisH-NIZ U.S. Fish Wildlife Service RECEIVED
Asheville Field Office
160 Zillicoa sheet JAN 8 1999
Asheville, North Carolina 288oi
828/258-3939, ext 227 Fax: [phone] ? !:€trtrcr?a::'„
MEMO FOR: Chuck Roadley
FROM: Mark A. Cantrell
DATE: January 7, 1999
SUBJECT: Forsyth County endangered species, 99-03 COE Permit Application
1. The attached list is known listed species for Forsyth County.
2. I checked our records, and we do not have. Any species occurrences in the immediate vicinity
of the location of your project. We do have records of bog turtles from nearby (-3.9 nu
southeast). I suggest you consider this species in yuu, analysis.
3. We are most concerned about potential impacts to the streams and wetlands. We suggest
maintaining buffers of at least 30 feet along any streams within the project area, rninim ng
disturbance to vegetation, and revegetate any disturbed areas within two weeks of construction.

L

J
7
1
n

A successful stream mitigation plan will need to first describe what the natural channel design is
relative to the principles of fluvial geomorphology. We will likely recomumend the following
elements be included in any stream mitigation fhr this project:
a. Riparian vegetation should inaludr, nntive woody species, such as alder (A)mts
spp•), black willow, and dogwood, as well as Arundinaria, sedges, grasses, and
rushes, as appropriate to the area, Exotic vegetation should be screened from any
plant material. Large woody species will provide thermal cover as well as deep
bank-stabilizing root systems along the constructed/reconstructed stream channel.
b. Stream channel construction and vegetation establishment should take place prior
to the diversion of water into the new channel.. Sequential construction of
segments and temporary pipe diversinnr can be utilized to ensure channel stability.
We would like to have an opportunity to inspect stream segments for stability prior
to the water diversion.
C. Stream channel design should mimic slope, riffle slope, pool slope, valley slope,
meander geometry, sinuosity, cross-sectinnai dimensions, entrenchment ratio, bed
material (pebble count), and bank-full discharge of a nearby reference reach of a
stable stream ofthc same classification (Rusgvtt 1996). Sank-full dimensions
should be generated based on those of an appropriate reference reach and/or the
latest discharge/channel dimension relationship developed for the Piedmont (we

u
r

u
u
n

u

I I

vir vl ? oo 1I&V 1 r co raa I M4 LJO 40%ty rrro AI*nLV IJILXI
can supply a copy of these curves if needed). We would like to review the final
' dcsign of the stream channel restoration and relocations.
d. Monitoring should continue for at least 5 years following channel construction.
' Annual reports should be submitted to the resource ageneics. Resource ageuuics
should be notified of problems with success or function of the stream mitigation
witUi 30 days of detection.
' e. An appropriate regional conservation organization should hold title to the deed
rPCtrielions on the mitigation site. The title to the conservation ea5cmcnt shoulJ be
' conveyed along with an endowment for future monitoring, management, and any
wiitinbencies to ensure a perpetual net increase in stream channel function in the
project area.
' f. Thn final mitigation plan should provide details relative to what measures will be
taken to control watershed conditions and prevent sediment pollution and
' increased water discharge that would potentially negate efforts at the stream
mitigation site(s).
' 3. The lxtexr draft "Guidelines for stream relocation and restoration in North Carolina," by the
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission, is a good guide to proper stream restoration and
relocation wunk. We do recommend obtaining a copy of the "Base nwide Wetlands and Riparian,
' Restoration Plan For The YadIdn-P= Dec River Basin" as a source of information about potential
sites. This document was published in September by the North Carolina Wetlands Restoration
program of the Division of Water Quality. Ms. Carol Shaw is the contact and may be reached at
' 9191733-7015, ert 250.
3. I am available to meet on the site with your staff if needed. Please contact me at 828/258-
3939, extension 227.
Thanks,
Marls
I

u

wi uuz

7

n

0

C
n
V1/Vf/t't7 lAV 1f.L21 t•11h. 1 -1 GJo JJJV rna A0EMr1JLZ WJVIIJ
' )ENDANGERED, TEMEATENED, AND CANDMA,TE SPECIES
' AND FEDERAL SFECIES OF CONCERN
IN FORSYTH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
' This list was adapted from the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program's County Species List.
It is a listing of North Carolina's federally listed and proposed endangered, threatened, and
cauditleAc sped"s and Federal species of concern (for a complete list of rare species in the state,
' please contact the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program). The information on this list is
compiled from a variety of sources, including field surveys, inuseums and herbariums, literature,
' and personal nnmmunications. The North Carolina Natural Heritage Program's database is
dynamic, with new records being added and old records being revised as new information is
receivvd. Plouse note that this list cannot be considered a definitive record of listed species and
' Federal species of concern, and it should not be considered a substitute for field surveys.
Vertebrates
Bog turtle Clemmys muhlenbergii T(SIAY
' Red-coclm&d woodpecker I''icuides borealis Endangered **4.+
Vascular Plants
' Small-anthered bitterc Tess Cardamine micranthera Endangered
I' KEY:
Status Definition
' Euclaugvn;d A =on "in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range."
Threatened A taxon "likely to became endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a
significant portion of its range."
' Proposed A taxon proposed for official listing as endangered or thnmteneri
C I A taxon under consideration for official listing for which there is sufficient information
to support listing.
' FSC A Federal species of concern - a species that tttay or may not be listed in the future
(formerly C2 candidate specicz ui NPccics under consideration for listing for which there
is insufficient information to support hstuna).
' T(S!A) Tbrea=W due to srtndanty of appearance (e.g., American alligator) - a species that is
threatened due to similarity of appearance %ith other rare species and is fisted for its
protection. These species are not biologically endangered or threatened and are not
subject to Section 7 consultation.
EXP A taxon that is listed as experimental (either essential or nonessential), Experimental,
nonessential endangered speoiee (o. g., rod wolf) arc treated as tluratccrcd ou public laud,
for consultation purposes, and as species proposed for listing on private land.
Species Aith 1, 2, 3, or 4 asterisks behind them indicate historic, obscure, or incidental records.
_l _... *Historic record - the species was last observed in the county more than 50 wars ago.
* *Obswit; ruvord - chc date and/or location of observation is uncertain_?
' ***Incidental/migrant record - the species was observed outride of its normal range or habitat.
*'"*Historic - obscure and incidental record.

n

1?

L

I?

u
L
STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT REPORT AND
WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT
PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER
ISAKSON-BARNHART DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
WINSTON-SALEM, N.C.
ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL
08/30/99
?'?e???? CARD •.
$ s SEAL
v ' 10565
??'?••.;cNGIN???•' Pao!
??'•?SR F R?ti?"•```
??t1I1t11t1j11,,
FREELAND & KAUFFMAN, INC.
ENGINEERS - LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
209 WEST STONE AVE.
GREENVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA 29609

V1/Vf/t?G inv it za rnA fVf GUo ooov r"a nommy ILLG tad VVJ
ENDANGERED, THREATENED AND CANDIDATE SPECm
' AND FEDERAL SPECIES OF CONCERN
IN FORSYTH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
' This list was adapted from the North Carolina Natural Heritage program's County Species List.
It is a listing of North Carolina's federally listed and proposed endangered, threatened, and
caudiddw species and Federal species of concern (for a complete list of rare species in the state,
' please contact the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program). The information on this list is
compiled from a variety of sources, including field surveys, museums and herbariums, literature,
' and persnmal cnmmunications. The North Carolina. Natural Heritage Program's database is
dynamic, with new records being added and old records being revised as new information is
receitGd. Phase note that this list cannot be considered a definitive record of fisted species and
' Federal species of concern, and it should not be considered a substitute for field surveys.
Vertehr'tes
Bog turtle Clemmys muhlenbergn T(S/Ay
' Red-cockaded woodpwkcr l'icuides bore"10 Endangered **4.+
Vascular Plants
' Small-anthered bittercress Cardamine micrantheta Endangered
' EE'Y:
Status Definition
' EiAdugom d A taxon "in danger of extinction throughmt ail or a sigiOcant portion of its range."
Threatened A taxon "likely to become endangered within the foreseeable future throughout all or a
significant portion of its ranges,"
' Proposed A taxon Proposed for official lisWw as endangered or thrmteneri
C l A taxon under consideration for official listing for which there is sufficient information
to support listing.
' FSC A Federal species of concern - a species that may or may not be listed in the future
(formorly C2 candidate specim ui spc oicu under consideration for listing for which there
is insufficient information to support listiV.
' T(S/A) ThrW=ed due to srmtlarity of appearance (e.g., American alligator) - a species that is
threatened due to similarity of appearance %rith other raze species and is listed for its
protection, These species are not biologically endangered or threatened and are not
subject to Section 7 consultation.
A taxon that is listed as experimental (either essential or nonessential), Experimental,
nonessential endangered species (o.S., rod wolf) arc trcated as tlucatured uu public law,
for consultation purposes, and as species proposed for listing on private land.
Species with 1, 2, 3, of 4 asterisks behind them indicate historic, obscure, or incidental records.
1 _.,. %storic record - the species was last observed in the county more than 50 years ago.
"Obscurc record - the date and/or location of observation is uncertain-
' ***Incidental/migrant record - the species was observed outside of its normal range or habitat.
****Historic - obscure and incidental record.
`i

7

F

L

APPENDIX D
Stormwater Management Plan & Water Quality Assessment
22

u

j
J
n

STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT REPORT AND
WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT
PROPOSED SHOPPING CENTER
ISAKSON-BARNHART DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
WINSTON-SALEM, N.C.
ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL
08/30/99
osoo ,(? CARS •?
0?4 ?? eiN•e•y /? ??
?. ?,?oF+?ss?oy.9
M° 0`04 9!•.
s SEAL
v 10565
• i • a
:9'? •?• •FN G t N E !I• • ? PLO'
F ••e......•
FREELAND & KAUFFMAN, INC.
ENGINEERS - LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
209 WEST STONE AVE.
GREENVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA 29609
F

n

1

I I

n

Winston Salem Drainage Study
Isakson - Barnhart Development
Hanes Mall Blvd. next to Lowes
Forsyth County, N.C.
DRAINAGE STUDY AND WATER QUALITY REPORT
The following is the drainage study for the proposed Costco Shopping Center to be built
along Hanes Mall Blvd. across from the existing Home Depot and south of the existing
Lowes Store. The site is being proposed to be developed to contain a +/- 145,946 s.f.
Costco Store, a +/- 75,000 s.f. "mini-anchor", a 30,000 s.f. Babies R Us, various shops
space totaling 28,380 s.f., a 24,000 s.f. Staples, and assorted other outparcels and
commercial space. The layout may contain the addition of a new road (an extension of
Westgate Center Blvd.) but this has not been determined at the time of this report. There
is also off-site runoff that will drain on to the site although a large portion of the off-site
runoff from the Lowes site and Hanes Mall Blvd. will be routed around the site. The
report includes determination of required pond size for water quality as well as quantity.
The State of North Carolina Dept. of Environment and Natural Resources requires the
treatment of water any time the disruption of a wetlands or stream occurs over 1501.f.
The City of Winston Salem requires that water quantity storage be accomplished to store
and release the runoff at the pre-developed rate not to exceed the 10 year design storm.
Lastly, since the runoff empties to a state road system, the pond will be analyzed for the
25 year storm event and measures shall be taken to store this runoff as well. In the final
design phase of the project, once final plans are established, the city and state will require
that sedimentation and erosion control will also be handled in this project to protect
downstream areas from silt. Plans also include the accompanying parking and landscape
areas. The existing stormwater system along Hanes Mall Blvd. will be utilized to take the
runoff from the pond as this is where the current runoff pattern lies. All runoff from the
developed site will be directed to a proposed pond located in the western front corner of
the site. We will also be researching alternative methods for stormwater storage to try and
accomplish the pond in an underground system. There are no underground storage system
currently approved by the NCDENR but they do have a procedure where, if a system is
proposed and can be proven to meet the requirements of the state they will be willing to
review it. The new pond will be sized to handle the first 1" of runoff and release it over a
48 hour period, the 2 year and 10 year storm events and restrict these storm events to the
pre-developed rates. The pond will have a staged outlet to manage each storm. The 100
year storm event will overtop the outlet structure but will not overtop the pond.
The stormwater runoff calculations shown in this report are based on the SCS TR-55
Method as required by the State of North Carolina and the City of Winston Salem. The
runoff numbers and hydrographs are included.

I

I I f :? I 1 1 \\\ \ I 1 I IKin?
CE POWER
?'1\11;111;11 1 1 \ \\ \ 1 1 I \ /iiii ,/ /'i ??
WAY - 1 1111 111 11 1 1 1 1 \ \ 1 l I%i??/ / / ???"1
) t l i 11111/11 111 1 1 1 1 ) \ 4 1 1 1////// j/// / /' 1
][NT I l l l f 11 11111
i32-597 I ! it I j 1 1 1 t?11i1111\\\
1 1 (-1 1 1 1 1 1111 \\1 \\\ \ ,
/ / / ? 1 i i i 1 i j ? \??\\???\??\ \\_`---`}/??/i/// /2206r i ! / ? + ?l \
j ! / / 111 / - jl 1 ? i I I \\\\\\\ ?``-? 1 1 i //I ?Pi \
\? + 1 + 1 / c??/,/ f l l l l /1l %/ ! ?/ _ 1 2
if i If
/? 1 / / ? 1 ? ao ! 1 ! i 1 ? l liiit/< / / 1 1 / 11 1 / l ! / ! / ! , `?•?;.::?x•' • :•.• ~ i 11
+ ? I 1 t ! /ice \ ? r 11111//11 !/! f' -,{??F`.,??;
,!//! e
1 /
N:V/ TRACT-
-164
?? i
/ , j i
jrj
/Z if
/ ! J _-` ? •? l III I
R
/ //Zj 1
-1 9
/
? -- ?? -??? ? ? / l /' / / / ! / !% //// % 1!/1!1( It ! 1-•= ,
i /! ! +
fill I
1111 I 1
cr)
//i/%?%%//?!!%!?/l
f

0

n

n

Existing Conditions:
The property is divided into three major drainage areas. The fast is on the eastern side
and leads from south to north towards Hanes Mall Blvd. The runoff drains through
wooded areas and eventually into an existing channel that flows north to Hanes Mall
Blvd. From there the runoff enters a 54" pipe and is conveyed down the road to an
existing creek. This drainage area also picks up the runoff from the Lowes Store on the
east side and a portion of Hanes Mall Blvd. The runoff from Lowes and the road will not
be affected by the new development as it will be piped around the system. The second
drainage area encompasses the "middle" of the "site and takes in most of the proposed
development area. There is also an area of off-site drainage to the south of the site that
flows through this section and will continue to flow through in the developed state.
Again, the flow sheets through wooded areas into an existing channel and ultimately to a
42" culvert at Hanes Mall Blvd. The last drainage area is a small section in the southwest
corner that drains south and west off the property into a completely separate drainage
basin. This area will not be affected by the development. The total the site is +/- 40.0
acres with areas of off-site drainage coming onto the property.
Slopes on the property vary but in general the site slopes from south to north. The bulk of
the slopes are 10% and get somewhat flatter in areas in and around the creek.
Soil types consist of type "B" soils as defined in the TR 55 manual and the Handbook on
Erosion Control design as issued by the state. These soils are mostly clays and sands with
small elements of loam and loamy sands. These soils are well drained, are moderately
permeable and have a medium capacity for water. Surface runoff is generally rapid to
very rapid.
The closest body of water to the site is "Little Creek" located north and west of the
property that leads west. The most northern extreme end, towards the west side, may lie
within a Flood Zone. Wetlands described as waters of the United States (creeks) are
present on the site. Refer to map provided by Williamsburg Environmental Group for
more detail.
I I

'
Developed Conditions:
' In the developed condition the site will be used for commercial development. This will
consist of several "big box" users that may include Costco, Staples, etc. There will also
be smaller shops spaces available that may total 30,000 s.f. The development will include
a field of parking, stormdrain system, and all accompanying utilities. The developed
condition will also include the installation of a stormwater pond to control both quantity

' and quality of runoff that leaves the site. The pond will be sized to meet both the State of
e
i
N
th C
li
t
d th
Cit
f Wi
t
l
S
R
i
na r
qu
remen
or
aro
e
y o
s an
ns
on
a
em
equ
rements.
' Permitting and Regulatory Requirements:
The permitting for stormwater falls into several categories, each divided by jurisdictional
' body, but all applying. The plans must be reviewed by the City of Winston Salem, the
County (in this case Forsyth County) for sediment and erosion control, and finally the
state (NCDENR) for water quality. We will discuss each body and what each will be
' reviewing and then discuss how all will need to be met.
The City of Winston Salem requires that all new developments provide for stormwater to
' be retained / detained on site and released at the pre-developed rate. This is standard
practice for most towns and requires that the runoff be held in a "pond" and then released
through an outlet structure to an existing culvert system or natural drainage way. The City
' requires that the pond be designed to hold and release the 10 year storm event. The 10
year storm is not a storm that can only happen once every 10 years as the name would
imply but rather a storm that has a 10 percent chance of happening each year. The storage
' can be accomplished with a surface pond (as shown on these plans), by storing water in
underground vaults or pipes, storing the water on the parking surface, or a combination of
these methods. The outlet structure is designed to release the runoff in stages by releasing
' the 2 year storm first, then releasing the 10 year storm etc. However, since the outlet will
empty to a state road we have designed the system to hold and release the 25 year storm.
' The county requires that the site be designed to retain sediment and erosion. The
requirements are based on the state standards for "Best Management Practices" and
' require that the site be designed to have a minimum of 85% removal of sediment. This
can be accomplished by the use of silt fence, inlet protection, sediment traps, sediment
basins, etc. We have designed the pond to handle the silt from the site by using a
' "forebay" in the pond that acts as a settling basin. The surface area is also based on the
depth of the pond and the overall developed area draining to the pond to provide for the
85% removal.
Lastly, the state will also have jurisdiction on the project because of the proposed
disturbance of wetlands. Due to this disturbance we are required to provide water quality
' treatment prior to turning the stormwater loose to the Hanes Mall Blvd. system. The
water quality is accomplished by the use of a wet pond that allows for evaporation of

phosphates, nitrogen, etc. and also allows for settling of suspended solids. This requires
that we store the first 1" of runoff and release it over a 2 to 4 day period.
' The total developed condition to the new pond will be approximately 3 8 acres of
pavement, roof and grass. The total area to the new pond also includes 8.0 acres of off-
s to the south of the site. This runoff can not be piped around the development so it will
be diverted to the pond. As stated earlier the off-site runoff from the Lowes store and
from Hanes Mall Blvd. will be directed around the site via new piping. All disturbed
' areas not receiving pavement will be grassed with a permanent grass mixture upon
completion of grading. These numbers will be used to obtain the Runoff Coefficient that
is a definition of percent impervious area.
' The slopes of the new parking lot will range from I% to 4.0 % with driveways ranging up
to 10% and all will drain to a series of catch basins which will lead via underground pipes
' to the new retention pond. The outlets into the pond will be submerged due to the pond
having a permanent pool. We have also sized the pond to pass (not store) the 100 year
storm without spilling out onto Hanes Mall Blvd.
E

r

E

J

7

n
L

L'
r

Runoff Calculations
Per the TR-55 Method the runoff will be calculated for the existing condition and a
hydrograph will be generated for this runoff showing Q vs. time. This will be done for the
2 year and 10 year storm events. The results are as follows:
Pre Developed Area #1
Pre=Devel?' d Rainfall Ruoff
Storm Event Q in cfs
2 year 3.5 in 2.34 cfs
10 year 5.0 9.75 cfs
25 year 6.0 16.52 cfs
100 year 7.0 in 25.78 cfs
Pre Developed Area #2
Pre'-Daelo ed,A Rainfall, onoff
Storm Event Q in cfs
2 year 3.5 in 3.36 cfs
10 year 5.0 15.31 cfs
25 year 6.0 26.52 cfs
100 year 7.0 in 42.05 cfs
' The runoff from area. 2 will be combined with the off-site runoff to the rear of the
proposed development to get the total pre-developed runoff from area 2. This is:
' Total including Off-Site from Pre Developed Area #2

L
C

Pre-Develo ,Rain-fall, uno"ff
Storm Event in cfs
2 year 3.5 in 8.34 cfs
10 year 5.0 25.90 cfs
25 year 6.0 41.24 cfs
100 year 7.0 in 61.99 cfs
11
r
i
t>F-yF L-gpEn To PT. A
1 - SCS Runoff - 2 Yr - Qp = 2.34 cfs
2
2
1
C1
1
0
0
Time (hrs)
/ Hyd. 1
0 5 10 15 20 25

1 - SCS Runoff -100 Yr - Qp 25.78 cfs
30-
25- 2
15 / Hyd. 1
CJ
10
5
0 0 5 10 15 20 25
Time (hrs)

v
C?
PTV- -17i'cVF•?--O r-- y C-*l - S iTR-. 'I c.
2 - SCS Runoff - 2 Yr - Qp = 3.36 cfs
14
DL
0 5 10 15 20
Time (hrs)
25
/ Hyd. 2

2 - SCS Runoff - 25 Yr - Qp = 26.52 cfs
30-
25-
20-
15- ? / Hyd. 2
10-
5-
o
L -1
0 5 10 15 20 25
Time (hrs)

2 - SCS Runoff -100 Yr - Qp = 42.05 cfs
50
40
30
/ Hyd. 2
Cl
20-
10-
01
0 5 10 15 20 25
Time (hrs)

11 - Combine - 2 Yr - Qp = 8.34 cfs
1
v
cr
Time (hrs)
(114C,L?. Or-r- - Srrr--
/ Hyd. 2
/ Hyd. 4
/ Hyd. 11
0 5 10 15 20 25

11 -Combine -25Yr-Qp=41.24cfs
50-
40- Hyd. 2
30
v
CY / Hyd. 4
20
10
?,... / Hyd. 11
0
0 5 10 15 20 25
Time (hrs)

11 - Combine -100 Yr - Qp = 61.99 cfs
so
/ Hyd. 2
6
40
/ Hyd. 4
20
/ Hyd. 11
Ol I-
]
0 5 10 15 20 25
Time (hrs)

Developed Condition to Pond
Next the developed condition will be evaluated for the drainage area to the Pond. The
runoff number will then be compared to the pre-developed rate and the pond will be
designed to limit outflow to less than the pre-developed rate.
Runoff Curve Number :
The developed condition will consist of parking areas and the roof areas of the shopping
center. This water will sheet across the parking lot to catch basins and be conveyed via
pipes and ditches to the pond. The pond will also be sized to accommodate the additional
pavement area. The post developed runoff will also include the off-site from the rear of
the site.
lioppu _Ziter Pa ed,& Voocl e i Areas. A 7 80 Grassed areas, 1 9
Kocif Arc a =.29acres 'acres. , c es
B'; oils
CN=98 CN=55 CN=58
Total weighted CN = 88
f Time of Concentration
' The time of concentration for the developed condition will be comprised of sheet flow for
the first 300 feet across wooded areas, then shallow concentrated flow to the pipe system,
and finally open channel flow through pipes to the pond.

r?

First 300 ft. Sheet I'Nct Shallow Conc. , LKastly. Open
rio'w {cry 5; 3% Flow >5°?q?slope, -C44IIIellFlovv next
slope, wgodcd `paved:are ' ," ??75 ft at'ivg.
?G:0 ftl
Total Tc = 39.0 min.
Rainfall
The rainfall from the U.S. National Weather Service (as stated above) are as follows:
2 yr. - 3.50 in
25 yr. - 6.0 in
100 yr. - 7.20 in
11

Runoff Calculations
Per the TR-55 Method the runoff will be calculated for the existing condition and a
hydrograph will be generated for this runoff showing Q vs. time. This will be done for the
2 year, 10 year, and 100 year storm events. The results are as follows:
Y t De. Wed Rainfal[Rate R (cfs)
Storm Event Q in cfs
2 year 3.5 in 69.64 cfs
10 year 5.0 in 114.43 cfs
25 year 6.0 in. 144.79 efs
100 year 7.2 in 181.38 cfs
These numbers will be used to develop hydrographs through the pond.

v
CY
POST -D TcVlGl.a??,p ) o ?kip
10 - Combine - 2 Yr - Qp = 69.64 cfs
Time (hrs)
/ Hyd. 3
/ Hyd. 4
/ Hyd. 10
0 5 10 15 20 25

10 - Combine - 25 Yr - Qp = 144.79 cfs
15
Hyd. 3
10
1,02
0
CY / Hyd. 4
50
/ Hyd. 10
0
0 5 10 15 20 2,5
Time (hrs)

10 - Combine -100 Yr - Qp =181.38 cfs
20 .
/ Hyd. 3
15
100
/ Hyd. 4
50
/ Hyd. 10
0
0 5 10 15 20 25
Time (hrs)

?u
n
L

POND SIZING AND ROUTING
The required pond sizing as stated earlier will be based on water quantity requirements
and water quality requirements. The required quantity is based on the 1" of runoff being
stored and released over a 48 hour period, and storing and releasing the 2 year and 25 year
storms at their pre-developed rates. The quality storage will be provided by supplying a
defined storage area (in square feet) as determined by the depth of the permanent pool and
the surface area to drainage area ratio.
Our fast proposal is to provide the pond area and volume in a "surface" pond. The pond,
as can be seen on the grading plan, will be a surface pond with a bottom elevation of
766.0, a permanent pool elevation off 772.0, and a top elevation of 780.0. Based on the
depth proposed of 6 feet, the required surface area for the 38.2 acre drainage area is
32,781 s.f. The surface area provided at elevation 772.0 is 40,538 s.f. This surface area
must be provided regardless of how the quantity is provided unless a new and
"innovative" system is proposed. The state allows for innovative systems as long as the
system can be proven to meet the state requirements and the state is given a chance to
review and approve the new system. Based on these requirements we have sized the
outlet to release the runoff at the various stages. The resulting outlet will have to release
runoff to the two existing culverts on Hanes Mall Blvd. For this reason there will actually
be two outlets for the pond, each sized for the individual pre-developed areas. To release
point `A' the outlet will have a 2.72" orifice. This will be accomplished with the use of a
2 %2" pvc pipe at elevation 772.0 that will elbow down into the permanent pool. The 2
year storm will be released through an orifice. The orifice will be 7.2" in diameter. The
25 year storm will be release via a weir at the top of the 2 year storage elevation. This
weir will be 1.0' in length at elevation 776.3. The 100 year storm will overtop the riser
and exit through the outlet pipe. For the release to Point "B' the outlet will have the same
2 %2" pvc pipe. The 2 year release will be through an orifice placed at the top of the 1"
storage (el. 774.33). The orifice will be 14.6" in diameter. The 25 year storm will be
released through a weir at the top of the 2 year storage elevation. The weir will be 1.89
feet in length. Again, the 100 year storm will overtop the riser and exit through the outlet
pipe. Refer to the calculations included for more details of required volumes The outlet
pipes from each riser are sized as follows;
Manning's Equation - Q= 1.49/n x A x R^2/3 X S^1/2
' From this equation it is determined that the required pipe size for each outlet will be 42".
Refer to the hydrographs for reservoir routing showing storage elevations, release rates,
etc.. The results are as follows:

POND Stage Storage
Voluhie Allowable
Release Actual Release
First 1" 774.33 101,930 0.6 cfs 0.6 cfs
2 . 776.20 193,996 cf 10.67 cfs 10.17 cfs
25 . 779.0 352,802 cf 57.68 cfs 56.89 cfs
100 yr. 779.70 392,584 cf N/a 112.32 cfs
' As can be seen in the above table the release rate from the pond for the 2 yr. and 25 yr.
storm events is below the allowable release rates in the pre-developed condition. The
required storage volume and the pond hydrographs show that the water is released over a
' period of 48 hours or longer.

n

J

t
CY
'Po Na Ka V-ro w'-)
13 - Reservoir - 2 Yr - Qp = 10.17 cfs
Time (hrs)
/ Hyd. 10
/ Hyd. 13
0 5 10 15 20 25

13 - Reservoir - 2 Yr - Max. El. = 776.20 ft
777
776
775
a?
w 774
773
772
0 5 10 15 20 25
Time (hrs)

' Hydrograph Report
Page 1
English
' Hyd. No. 13
Pond Routing
' Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 10.17 cfs
Stone frequency = 2 yrs Time interval = 1 min
Inflow hyd. No. = 10 Reservoir name = Front Pond all
' Max. Elevation = 776.20 ft Max. Storage = 193,969 cuft
' st«ap Wicab. meftd used, Total Volume = M.3U cuft
Hydrograph Discharge Table
' Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Outflow
(hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs
10.13 1.62 772.19 0.47 0.11 - - - -
-
0.11
' 10.20 1.69 772.20 0.50 0.12 `
?
0.12
10.27 1.77 772.21 0.55 0.12 - - - - - - 0.12
10.33 1.86 772.22 0.61 0.13 - - - - - - 0.13
10.40 1.95 772.23 0.66 0.13 0.13
' 10.47 2.05 772.24 0.72 0.14 - - - -- -- -
0.14
10.53 2.16 772.25 0.78 0.14 - - - - - - 0.14
10.60 2.28 772.26 0.85 0.15 - -
0.15
' 10.67 2.40 772.27 0.92 0.15 -
- -
0.15
10.73 2.53 772.29 0.99 0.16 - -
-
0.16
10.80 2.67 772.30 1.08 0.17 - - - ----- - - 0.17
10.87 2.83 772.32 1.20 0.17 0.17
' 10.93 3.00 772.33 1.33 0.18 - - ____ 0.18
11.00 3.18 772.35 1.48 0.19 - - - - - - 0.19
11.07 3.35 772.37 1.63 0.19 - - - - - - 0.19
' 11.13 3.54 772.39 1.78 0.20 -
0.20
11.20 3.76 772.40 1.97 0.21 - _
-- - - - -
0.21
11.27 4.00 772.43 2.23 0.22 - - - - - - 0.22
' 11.33 4.28
11.40 4.59 772.45
772.47 2.50
2.79 0.22
0.23 --- -- -
0.22
0.23
11.47 4.99 772.50 3.11 0.24 - -
-
0.24
11.53 5.46 772.53 3.38 0.25 - - - - - ---- 0.25
11.60 6.15 772.56 3.68 0.26 - -
0.26
' 11.67 7.32 772.60 4.03 0.27 - _ - - r
?
0.27
11.73 9.30 772.64 4.86 0.28 - - - - - - 0.28
11.80 12.53 772.70 6.02 0.29 -- - - ---- - - 0.29
' 11.87 17.93 772.79 7.19 0.31 0.31
11.93 26.56 772.91 9.13 0.34 - --- - - -
0.34
12.00 37.27 773.08 12.38 0.37 - - - ----- ---- ---- 0.37
12.07 47.78 773.31 19.35 0.42 0.42
-- - - -
' 12.13 57.23 773.59 27.61 0.46 -
--
0.46
12.20 64.89 773.92 36.48 0.51 - - - - ---- ---- 0.51
12.27 69.28 774.27 50.53 0.56 - ----- - ---- - 0.56
12.33 68.60 774.62 66.85 0.60 0.27 0.42-
1.29
12.40 64.04 774.94 79.77 0.61 -- -- --
0.89 1.75 3.26
12.47 58.45 775.22 94.73 0.63 1.25 3.22 - ----- - - 5.10
' Continues on next page...

FBI

E

n

Pond Routing Page 2
Hydrograph Discharge Table
Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C CIv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Outflow
(firs) cfs ft Cfs Cfs Cfs Cfs efs Cfs Cfs Cfs Cfs
12.53 52.43 775.46 107.95 0.64 1.50 4.58 - - - - 6.73
12.60 46.06 775.66 116.77 0.66 1.68 5.50 - - - - 7.83
12.67 39.48 775.83 124.60 0.67 1.81 6.13 - - - - 8.61
12.73 32.92 775.96 131.96 0.68 1.91 6.59 - - - - 9.19
12.80 26.63 776.05 137.24 0.69 1.98 6.91 - - - - 9.58
12.87 20.90 776.12 140.75 0.69 2.03 7.12 - - - - 9.84
12.93 16.34 776.16 142.89 0.70 2.05 7.24 - - - - 9.99
13.00 13.60 776.18 144.09 0.70 2.07 7.31 - - - - 10.08
13.07 12.22 776.19 144.77 0.70 2.08 7.35 - - - - 10.13
13.13 11.24 776.20 145.16 0.70 2.08 7.37 - - - - 10.15
13.20 10.47 776.20 145.33 0.70 2.08 7.38 - - - ---- 10.17
13.27 9.83 776.20 145.33 0.70 2.08 7.38 - - - - 10.17
13.33 9.29 776.20 145.18 0.70 2.08 7.37 - - - - 10.15
13.40 8.83 776.19 144.90 0.70 2.08 7.36 - - - - 10.14
13.47 8.44 776.19 144.53 0.70 2.07 7.33 - - - - 10.11
13.53 8.10 776.18 144.08 0.70 2.07 7.31 - - - - 10.08
13.60 7.79 776.17 143.55 0.70 2.06 7.28 - - - - 10.04
13.67 7.50 776.16 142.96 0.70 2.05 7.24 - - - - 10.00
13.73 7.23 776.15 142.31 0.70 2.05 7.21 - - - - 9.95
13.80 6.98 776.13 141.60 0.70 2.04 7.17 - - - - 9.90
13.87 6.74 776.12 140.85 0.69 2.03 7.12 - - - - 9.85
13.93 6.52 776.11 140.05 0.69 2.02 7.08 - - - - 9.79
14.00 6.31 776.09 139.21 0.69 2.01 7.03 - - - - 9.73
14.07 6.11 776.07 138.33 0.69 2.00 6.98 - - - - 9.66
14.13 5.92 776.06 137.42 0.69 1.98 6.92 - - - - 9.60
14.20 5.74 776.04 136.48 0.69 1.97 6.87 - - - - 9.53
14.27 5.57 776.02 135.51 0.69 1.96 6.81 - - - - 9.46
14.33 5.42 776.01 134.52 0.68 1.95 6.75 - - - - 9.38
14.40 5.28 775.99 133.46 0.68 1.93 6.69 - - - - 9.30
14.47 5.15 775.97 132.38 0.68 1.92 6.62 - - - - 9.22
14.53 5.04 775.95 131.28 0.68 1.90 6.55 - - - - 9.14
14.60 4.94 775.93 130.17 0.68 1.89 6.48 - - - - 9.05
14.67 4.85 775.91 129.07 0.68 1.87 6.42 - - - - 8.97
14.73 4.77 775.89 127.96 0.68 1.86 6.34 - - - - 8.88
14.80 4.70 775.87 126.85 0.67 1.84 6.27 - - - - 8.79
14.87 4.63 775.85 125.74 0.67 1.83 6.20 - - - - 8.70
14.93 4.56 775.83 124.64 0.67 1.81 6.13 - - - - 8.61
15.00 4.50 775.81 123.55 0.67 1.80 6.06 - - - - 8.53
15.07 4.44 775.79 122.47 0.67 1.78 5.99 - - - - 8.44
15.13 4.38 775.77 121.38 0.67 1.77 5.91 - - - - 8.35
15.20 4.32 775.75 120.31 0.66 1.75 5.84 - - - - 8.26
15.27 4.26 775.73 119.25 0.66 1.74 5.77 - - -- - 8.17
15.33 4.20 775.71 118.19 0.66 1.72 5.69 - - - - 8.08
15.40 4.14 775.70 117.31 0.66 1.71 5.62 - - --- - 7.99
15.47 4.08 775.68 117.02 0.66 1.69 5.55 ----- - ----- - 7.90
15.53 4.02 775.66 116.73 0.66 1.68 5.49 - - -- - 7.82
15.60 3.96 775.64 116.43 0.66 1.66 5.42 - ---- - - 7.74
15.67 3.90 775.62 116.14 0.66 1.65 5.35 - - - - 7.65
15.73 3.84 775.60 115.86 0.65 1.63 5.29 - ----- -- - 7.57
Continues on next page...

u
n
u

Pond Routing Page 3
Hydrograph Discharge Table
Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Outflow
(hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs
15.80 3.77 775.59 115.03 0.65 1.61 5.21 - - - - 7.47
15.87 3.71 775.57 114.04 0.65 1.60 5.12 - - - - 7.37
15.93 3.65 775.55 113.06 0.65 1.58 5.04 - - - - 7.27
16.00 3.59 775.53 112.09 0.65 1.57 4.96 - - - - 7.17
16.07 3.53 775.52 111.13 0.65 1.55 4.87 - - - - 7.07
16.13 3.47 775.50 110.18 0.65 1.54 4.79 - - - - 6.98
16.20 3.41 775.48 109.24 0.65 1.52 4.70 - - - - 6.87
16.27 3.35 775.47 108.31 0.64 1.51 4.62 - - - - 6.77
16.33 3.30 775.45 107.40 0.64 1.49 4.53 - - - - 6.66
16.40 3.25 775.43 106.50 0.64 1.47 4.45 - - - - 6.56
16.47 3.21 775.42 105.62 0.64 1.46 4.36 - - - - 6.46
16.53 3.17 775.40 104.75 0.64 1.44 4.28 - - - - 6.36
16.60 3.13 775.39 103.90 0.64 1.43 4.20 - - - - 6.27
16.67 3.10 775.37 103.07 0.64 1.41 4.12 - - - - 6.17
16.73 3.07 775.36 102.26 0.64 1.40 4.04 - - - - 6.08
16.80 3.04 775.34 101.46 0.64 1.39 3.97 - - - - 5.99
16.87 3.02 775.33 100.68 0.64 1.37 3.89 - - - - 5.90
16.93 2.99 775.32 99.92 0.63 1.36 3.82 - - - - 5.81
17.00 2.97 775.30 99.18 0.63 1.34 3.75 - - - - 5.73
17.07 2.95 775.29 98.46 0.63 1.33 3.67 - - - - 5.63
17.13 2.93 775.28 97.76 0.63 1.32 3.58 - -- - - 5.53
17.20 2.91 775.26 97.07 0.63 1.30 3.50 - - - - 5.43
17.27 2.88 775.25 96.42 0.63 1.29 3.42 - ---- ---- - 5.34
17.33 2.86 775.24 95.77 0.63 1.28 3.34 - - - - 5.25
17.40 2.84 775.23 95.15 0.63 1.26 3.27 - - ----- ---- 5.16
17.47 2.82 775.22 94.54 0.63 1.25 3.20 - - - - 5.07
17.53 2.80 775.21 93.96 0.63 1.24 3.13 - - ---- - 4.99
17.60 2.78 775.20 93.38 0.63 1.23 3.06 - - - - 4.91
17.67 2.75 775.19 92.83 0.62 1.22 3.00 -- - - - 4.84
17.73 2.73 775.18 92.29 0.62 1.20 2.94 - - - - 4.77
17.80 2.71 775.17 91.76 0.62 1.19 2.89 - - - ----- 4.70
17.87 2:69 775.16 91.25 0.62 1.18 2.83 - - - - 4.64
17.93 2.67 775.15 90.74 0.62 1.17 2.78 - - - - 4.57
18.00 2.64 775.14 90.25 0.62 1.16 2.73 ----- ----- ----- ----- 4.51
18.07 2.62 775.13 89.76 0.62 1.15 2.68 - ----- - - 4.44
18.13 2.60 775.12 89.29 0.62 1.14 2.63 -- - - - 4.38
18.20 2.58 775.11 88.83 0.62 1.13 2.58 - - ---- - 4.32
18.27 2.55 775.11 88.38 0.62 1.12 2.53 - - - ----- 4.27
18.33 2.53 775.10 87.93 0.62 1.11 2.49 - - - - 4.21
18.40 2.51 775.09 87.51 0.62 1.10 2.45 - - - - - 4.16
18.47 2.49 775.08 87.08 0.62 1.08 2.41 ----- - - - 4.12
18.53 2.47 775.07 86.66 0.62 1.07 2.38 - - ----- - 4.07
18.60 2.44 775.07 86.25 0.62 1.06 2.34 ----- --- - - 4.02
18.67 2.42 775.06 85.85 0.62 1.05 2.31 - - - - 3.98
18.73 2.40 775.05 85.45 0.62 1.04 2.27 - - - - 3.94
18.80 2.38 775.04 85.06 0.62 1.03 2.24 - - - - 3.89
18.87 2.35 775.64 84.67 0.62 1.02 2.21 -- - - - 3.85
18.93 2.33 775.03 84.29 0.62 1.01 2.17 ---- ---- - - 3.81
19.00 2.31 775.02 83.91 0.62 1.00 2.14 - - - - 3.76
Continues on next page...

E
L
n

1?
F
E

1
Pond Routing Page 4
Hydrograph Discharge Table
Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B. Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Outflow
(hrs) cfs ft CfS CfS CfS cfs as cfs as cfs cfs
19.07 2.29 775.01 83.53 0.62 1.00 2.11 - - - - 3.72
19.13 2.26 775.01 83.17 0.62 0.99 2.08 - - - - 3.68
19.20 2.24 775.00 82.80 0.62 0.98 2.05 - - - - 3.64
19.27 2.22 774.99 82.43 0.62 0.97 2.01 - - - - 3.60
19.33 2.20 774.99 82.07 0.62 0.96 1.98 - - - - 3.55
19.40 2.18 774.98 81.71 0.61 0.95 1.94 - - - - 3.50
19.47 2.15 774.97 81.36 0.61 0.94 1.91 - - - - 3.46
19.53 2.13 774.97 81.01 0.61 0.93 1.87 - - - - 3.41
19.60 2.11 774.96 80.67 0.61 0.92 1.84 - - - - 3.37
19.67 2.08 774.95 80.33 0.61 0.91 1.81 - - - - 3.33
19.73 2.06 774.95 80.00 0.61 0.90 1.77 - - - - 3.29
19.80 2.04 774.94 79.68 0.61 0.89 1.74 - - - - 3.24
19.87 2.02 774.94 79.36 0.61 0.88 1.71 - - - - 3.20
19.93 1.99 774.93 79.04 0.61 0.87 1.68 - - - - 3.16
20.00 1.97 774.92 78.73 0.61 0.86 1.65 - - - - 3.12
20.07 1.95 774.92 78.42 0.61 0.85 1.62 - - - - 3.08
20.13 1.93 774.91 78.12 0.61 0.84 1.59 - - - - 3.05
20.20 1.91 774.91 77.82 0.61 0.84 1.56 - - - - 3.01
20.27 1.89 774.90 77.53 0.61 0.83 1.53 - - - - 2.97
20.33 1.87 774.90 77.25 0.61 0.82 1.51 - - - - 2.93
20.40 1.85 774.89 76.97 0.61 0.81 1.48 - - - - 2.90
20.47 1.84 774.88 76.70 0.61 0.79 1.46 - - - - 2.86
20.53 1.82 774.88 76.43 0.61 0.78 1.43 - - - - 2.83
20.60 1.81 774.87 76.17 0.61 0.77 1.41 - - - - 2.79
20.67 1.80 774.87 75.91 0.61 0.76 1.39 - - - - 2.76
20.73 1.79 774.86 75.67 0.61 0.75 1.37 - - - - 2.73
20.80 1.79 774.86 75.42 0.61 0.74 1.35 - - - - 2.70
20.87 1.78 774.86 75.19 0.61 0.73 1.33 - - - - 2.67
20.93 1.78 774.85 74.96 0.61 0.72 1.31 - - - - 2.64
21.00 1.77 774.85 74.74 0.61 0.72 1.29 - - - - 2.61
21.07 1.77 774.84 74.52 0.61 0.71 1.27 - - - - 2.58
21.13 1.76 774.84 74.31 0.61 0.70 1.25 - - - - 2.55
21.20 1.76 774.83 74.11 0.61 0.69 1.23 - - - - 2.53
21.27 1.76 774.83 73.91 0.61 0.68 1.21 - - - - 2.50
21.33 1.75 774.83 73.72 0.61 0.67 1.20 - - - - 2.48
21.40 1.75 , 774.82 73.53 0.61 0.67 1.18 - - - - 2.45
21.47 1.74 774.82 73.34 0.61 0.66 1.16 - - - - 2.43
21.53 1.74 774.82 73.17 0.61 0.65 1.15 - - -- - 2.41
21.60 1.73 774.81 73.00 0.61 0.65 1.13 - - - - 2.38
21.67 1.73 774.81 72.83 0.61 0.64 1.12 - - 2.36
21.73 1.73 774.81 72.67 0.61 0.63 1.10 - - - - 2.34
21.80 1.72 774.80 72.50 0.61 0.63 1.09 - - - - 2.32
21.87 1.72 774.80 72.35 0.60 0.62 1.08 - - --- - 2.30
21.93 1.71 774.80 72.29 0.60 0.61 1.06 - - - - 2.28
22.00 1.71 774.79 72.25 0.60 0.61 1.05 - - - - 2.27
22.07 1.70 774.79 72.22 0.60 0.60 1.04 - - - - 2.25
22.13 1.70 774.79 72.18 0.60 0.60 1.03 -- - -- - 2.23
22.20 1.69 774.79 72.15 0.60 0.59 1.02 - - - - 2.22
22.27 1.69 774.78 72.11 0.60 0.59 1.01 - - - - 2.20
Continues on next page...

' Pond Routing

Hydrograph Discharge Table
Page 5
Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Outflow
(hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs
22.33 1.69 774.78 72.08 0.60 0.58 1.00 - - - - 2.19
22.40 1.68 774.78 72.05 0.60 0.57 0.99 - ----- - - 2.17
22.47 1.68 774.78 72.01 0.60 0.57 0.98 - - - - 2.16
22.53 1.67 774.77 71.98 0.60 0.56 0.98 ---- - - - 2.14
22.60 1.67 774.77 71.95 0.60 0.56 0.97 - - - - 2.13
22.67 1.66 774.77 71.92 0.60 0.56 0.96 - - - - 2.12
22.73 1.66 774.77 71.89 0.60 0.55 0.95 - - - - 2.10
22.80 1.66 774.76 71.86 0.60 0.55 0.94 - - - - 2.09
22.87 1.65 774.76 71.83 0.60 0.54 0.93 - - - - 2.08
22.93 1.65 774.76 71.81 0.60 0.54 0.92 - - - - 2.06
23.00 1.64 774.76 71.78 0.60 0.53 0.92 - - - - 2.05
23.07 1.64 774.76 71.75 0.60 0.53 0.91 - - - - 2.04
23.13 1.63 774.75 71.72 0.60 0.52 0.90 - - - - 2.03
23.20 1.63 774.75 71.70 0.60 0.52 0.89 - - - - 2.02
23.27 1.62 774.75 71.67 0.60 0.52 0.89 - - - - 2.01
23.33 1.62 774.75 71.65 0.60 0.51 0.88 - - - - 1.99
23.40 1.62 774.75 71.62 0.60 0.51 0.87 - - - - 1.98
23.47 1.61 774.74 71.60 0.60 0.51 0.86 - - - - 1.97
23.53 1.61 774.74 71.58 0.60 0.50 0.86 - - - - 1.96
23.60 1.60 774.74 71.55 0.60 0.50 0.85 - - - - 1.95
23.67 1.60 774.74 71.53 0.60 0.49 0.84 - - - - 1.94
23.73 1.59 774.74 71.51 0.60 0.49 0.84 - - - - 1.93
23.80 1.59 774.74 71.48 0.60 0.49 0.83 - - - - 1.92
23.87 1.59 774.73 71.46 0.60 0.48 0.83 -- - ---- - 1.91
23.93 1.58 774.73 71.44 0.60 0.48 0.82 - - - - 1.90
24.00 0.00 774.73 71.41 0.60 0.48 0.81 ---- - - - 1.89
...End
? a
?OW O
13 - Reservoir - 25 Yr - Qp = 56.89 cfs
1
1
Time (hrs)
/ Hyd. 10
/ Hyd. 13
0 5 10 15 20 25

13 - Reservoir - 25 Yr - Max. El. = 779.05 ft
780
778
776
v
w 775
773
772
0 5 10 15 20 25
Time (hrs)

Hydrograph Report
' Page 1
English
Hyd. No. 13
Pond Routing
Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge = 56.89 cfs
Storm frequency = 25 yrs Time interval = 1 min
Inflow hyd. No. = 10 Reservoir name = Front Pond all
' Max. Elevation = 779 .05 ft Max. Storage = 352,802 cuft

storne Wscr"dw meawd used. Total Volume = 584,690 cult
H
d h Di h T
bl
y
rograp sc
arge a
e
Time Inflow Elevation Civ A Civ B Civ C Civ D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Outflow
(hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs -Cfs
11.93 59.45 774.52 62.12 0.59 0.13 0.20 - - - - 0.91
' 12.00 81.42 774.87 75.87 0.61 0.76 1.39 2.76
12.07 102.68 775.30 99.04 0.63 1.34 3.74 - - _ -
5.71
12.13 121.45 775.81 123.37 0.67 1.80 6.05 - - - - 8.51
' 12.20
12.27 136.29
144.28 776.36
776.94 153.88 0.71
184.95 0.75 2.19
2.54 7.85
9.38 0.05
1.36 0.11 -
2.93 - 10.92
16.95
12.33 142.06 777.48 207.90 0.78 2.82 10.59 3.38 7.26 24.82
12.40 132.09 777.95 224.00 0.80 3.05 11.55 5.59 12.00 - - 32.97
12.47 120.03 778.32 237.30 0.81 3.21 12.25 7.57 16.26 - 40.11
' 12.53 107.18 778.61 247.20 0.82 3.34 12.77 9.26 19.88 - -
46.07
12.60 93.70 778.82 254.25 0.83 3.43 13.15 10.57 22.71 - - 50.69
12.67 79.90 778.96 258.82 0.84 3.48 13.39 11.48 24.65 - - 53.84
' 12.73 66.25 779.04 261.12 0.84 3.51 13.51 11.95 25.66 0.81 56.28
12.80 53.27 779.05 261.49 0.84 3.52 13.53 12.02 25.82 1.07 -
56.81
12.87 41.57 779.01 260.39 0.84 3.50 13.47 11.79 25.33 0.28 - 55.22
' 12.93
13.00 32.30
26.67 778.94
778.85 258.10 0.84
255.03 0.83 3.48
3.44 13.35
13.19 11.33
10.72 24.34 -
23.03 ----- - 53.33
51.22
13.07 23.76 778.74 251.68 0.83 3.39 13.01 10.08 21.65 - - 48.97
13.13 21.75 778.64 248.25 0.83 3.35 12.83 9.45 20.29 - - 46.75
13.20 20.23 778.54 244.84 0.82 3.31 12.65 8.84 18.99 - 44.61
' 13.27 18.96 778.44 241.49 0.82 3.27 12.47 8.26 17.75 - -
42.56
13.33 17.89 778.34 238.20 0.81 3.22 12.30 7.72 16.58 - - 40.63
13.40 16.99 778.25 235.00 0.81 3.18 12.13 7.21 15.47 38.80
13.47 16.22 778.16 231.89 0.80 3.14 11.96 6.73 14.44 - -
37.08
13.53 15.55 778.08 228.88 0.80 3.11 11.81 6.28 13.48 35.47
13.60 14.94 778.00 225.97 0.80 3.07 11.65 5.86 12.58 - - 33.96
13.67 14.38 777.92 223.00 0.80 3.03 11.49 5.45 11.70 - 32.48
' 13.73 13.85 777.84 220.47 0.80 3.00 11.34 5.07 10.88 - _
31.09
13.80 13.35 777.77 218.27 0.79 2.96 11.20 4.71 10.12 - - 29.79
13.87 12.89 777.70 216.35 0.79 2.93 11.06 4.38 9.41 - - 28.57
' 13.93 12.46 777.64 213.95 0.79 2.90 10.92 4.08 8.76 27.44
14.00 12.05 777.57 211.60 0.78 2.87 10.79 3.79 _
8.14 -
26.37
14.07 11.67 777.51 209.31 0.78 2.84 10.66 3.52 7.57 - - 25.37
' 14.13
14.20 11.30
10.95 777.45
777.40 206.82 0.78
204.37 0.78 2.81
2.78 10.54
10.42 3.27
3.04 7.03 -
6.53 - 24.43
23.54
14.27 10.62 777.34 202.54 0.77 2.75 10.30 2.82 6.06 22.71
' Continues on next page...
i

n
it
U

u

Pond Routing Page 2
Hydrograph Discharge Table
Time Inflow Elevation Clv A CIv 6 Civ C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Outflow
(hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs
14.33 10.32 777.29 200.65 0.77 2.73 10.19 2.62 5.62 - - 21.92
14.40 10.05 777.24 197.96 0.77 2.70 10.08 2.43 5.21 - - 21.18
14.47 9.81 777.20 195.41 0.77 2.68 9.97 2.24 4.82 - - 20.48
14.53 9.59 777.15 193.62 0.76 2.65 9.87 2.08 4.47 - - 19.83
14.60 9.40 777.11 191.90 0.76 2.63 9.77 1.92 4.13 - - 19.20
14.67 9.23 777.07 190.20 0.76 2.61 9.67 1.78 3.82 - - 18.63
14.73 9.07 777.03 188.56 0.76 2.58 9.58 1.64 3.52 - - 18.08
14.80 8.92 776.99 186.94 0.75 2.56 9.49 1.51 3.24 - - 17.56
14.87 8.79 776.95 185.28 0.75 2.54 9.39 1.39 2.98 - - 17.05
14.93 8.66 776.91 183.69 0.75 2.52 9.31 1.27 2.73 - - 16.57
15.00 8.54 776.88 181.52 0.75 2.50 9.22 1.16 2.49 - - 16.12
15.07 8.43 776.84 179.07 0.74 2.48 9.14 1.06 2.28 - - 15.70
15.13 8.31 776.81 176.71 0.74 2.46 9.06 0.97 2.08 - - 15.30
15.20 8.19 776.78 174.92 0.74 2.44 8.98 0.88 1.89 - - 14.93
15.27 8.08 776.75 173.47 0.74 2.43 8.90 0.80 1.72 - - 14.58
15.33 7.96 776.72 172.08 0.74 2.41 8.83 0.72 1.55 - - 14.25
15.40 7.84 776.69 170.72 0.74 2.39 8.75 0.65 1.40 - - 13.93
15.47 7.72 776.67 169.37 0.73 2.38 8.68 0.59 1.26 - - 13.64
15.53 7.61 776.64 168.05 0.73 2.36 8.61 0.52 1.13 - - 13.36
15.60 7.49 776.61 166.78 0.73 2.35 8.54 0.46 1.00 - ----- 13.08
15.67 7.37 776.59 165.52 0.73 2.33 8.48 0.41 0.88 - - 12.83
15.73 7.25 776.56 164.28 0.73 2.32 8.41 0.36 0.77 - - 12.59
15.80 7.14 776.54 163.06 0.73 2.30 8.35 0.31 0.67 - - 12.36
15.87 7.02 776.52 161.87 0.73 2.29 8.28 0.27 0.57 - - 12.13
15.93 6.90 776.49 160.68 0.72 2.27 8.22 0.22 0.48 - - 11.92
16.00 6.78 776.47 159.51 0.72 2.26 8.16 0.19 0.41 - - 11.73
16.07 6.67 776.45 158.35 0.72 2.24 8.09 0.16 0.33 - - 11.55
16.13 6.55 776.42 157.20 0.72 2.23 8.03 0.12 0.26 - - 11.37
16.20 6.44 776.40 156.07 0.72 2.22 7.97 0.09 0.19 - - 11.18
16.27 6.33 776.38 154.93 0.72 2.20 7.91 0.07 0.15 - - 11.04
16.33 6.23 776.36 153.80 0.71 2.19 7.85 0.05 0.11 - - 10.91
16.40 6.13 776.34 152.67 0.71 2.18 7.79 0.03 0.07 - - 10.78
16.47 6.05 776.32 151.55 0.71 2.16 7.73 0.01 0.03 - - 10.64
16.53 5.97 776.30 150.45 0.71 2.15 7.67 - - - - 10.52
16.60 5.90 776.28 149.33 0.71 2.13 7.60 - - - - 10.44
16.67 5.84 W 776.26 148.22 0.71 2.12 7.54 - -- - 10.37
16.73 5.78 776.23 147.11 0.70 2.11 7.48 - - - - 10.29
16.80 5.73 776.21 146.01 0.70 2.09 7.42, - - - -- 10.21
16.87 5.68 776.19 144.90 0.70 2.08 7.36 - - - ---- 10.14
16.93 5.64 776.17 143.80 0.70 2.07 7.29 - - - ----- 10.06
17.00 5.60 776.15 142.70 0.70 2.05 7.23 - - - - 9.98
17.07 5.55 776.13 141.61 0.70 2.04 7.17 - - - -- 9.90
17.13 5.51 776.11 140.53 0.69 2.02 7.11 - - - ----- 9.82
17.20 5.47 776.09 139.46 0.69 2.01 7.04 - - - - 9.75
17.27 5.43 776.08 138.39 0.69 2.00 6.98 -- -- - - 9.67
17.33 5.39 776.06 137.32 0.69 1.98 6.92 ---- - - ---- 9.59
17.40 5.34 776.04 136.26 0.69 1.97 6.85 - -- - - 9.51
17.47 5.30 776.02 135.22 0.69 1.96 6.79 - --- --- - 9.43
17.53 5.26 776.00 134.18 0.68 1.94 6.73 - - - - 9.36
Continues on next page...

v

n

Pond Routing Page 3
Hydrograph Discharge Table
Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B. Civ C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Outflow
(hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs as cfs as cfs cfs
17.60 5.22 775.98 133.08 0.68 1.93 6.66 - - - - 9.27
17.67 5.18 775.96 131.99 0.68 1.91 6.60 - - - - 9.19
17.73 5.13 775.94 130.92 0.68 1.90 6.53 - - - - 9.11
17.80 5.09 775.92 129.85 0.68 1.88 6.46 - - - - 9.03
17.87 5.05 775.90 128.80 0.68 1.87 6.40 - - - - 8.95
17.93 5.01 775.88 127.76 0.68 1.86 6.33 - - -- - 8.86
18.00 4.97 775.87 126.72 0.67 1.84 6.26 ---- - - - 8.78
18.07 4.92 775.85 125.69 0.67 1.83 6.20 - ----- - - 8.70
18.13 4.88 775.83 124.68 0.67 1.81 6.13 - -- - - 8.62
18.20 4.84 775.81 123.67 0.67 1.80 6.07 - - - - 8.54
18.27 4.80 775.79 122.67 0.67 1.79 6.00 - ---- - - 8.46
18.33 4.75 775.78 121.68 0.67 1.77 5.93 - - - - 8.37
18.40 4.71 775.76 120.71 0.67 1.76 5.87 - - - - 8.29
18.47 4.67 775.74 119.74 0.66 1.74 5.80 - - - 8.21
18.53 4.63 775.72 118.79 0.66 1.73 5.73 - - - - 8.13
18.60 4.58 775.71 117.84 0.66 1.72 5.67 - - - - 8.05
18.67 4.54 775.69 117.25 0.66 1.70 5.61 - - - - 7.97
18.73 4.50 775.68 116.98 0.66 1.69 5.55 - - - - 7.89
18.80 4.46 775.66 116.72 0.66 1.68 5.49 - - - - 7.82
18.87 4.41 775.64 116.47 0.66 1.66 5.43 - - - - 7.75
18.93 4.37 775.63 116.21 0.66 1.65 5.37 - - - - 7.67.
19.00 4.33 775.61 115.96 0.65 1.64 5.31 - - - - 7.60
19.07 4.29 775.60 115.52 0.65 1.62 5.25 - - - - 7.52
19.13 4.24 775.58 114.66 0.65 1.61 5.17 - - - - 7.43
19.20 4.20 775.56 113.80 0.65 1.59 5.10 - - - - 7.35
19.27 4.16 775.55 112.96 0.65 1.58 5.03 - - - - 7.26
19.33 4.12 775.53 112.13 0.65 1.57 4.96 - - - - 7.18
19.40 4.07 775.52 111.31 0.65 1.56 4.89 - - - - 7.09
19.47 4.03 775.51 110.50 0.65 1.54 4.82 - - - - 7.01
19.53 3.99 775.49 109.70 0.65 1.53 4.75 - - - - 6.92
19.60 3.95 775.48 108.92 0.65 1.52 4.67 - - - - 6.84
19.67 3.90 775.46 108.15 0.64 1.50 4.60 - - - - 6.75
19.73 3.86 775.45 107.39 0.64 1.49 4.53 - - - - 6.66
19.80 3.82 775.44 106.64 0.64 1.48 4.46 - - - - 6.58
19.87 3.77 775.42 105.90 0.64 1.46 4.39 - - - - 6.49
19.93 3.73 775.41 105.18 0.64 1.45 4.32 - - - - 6.41
20.00 3.69 775.40 104.46 0.64 1.44 4.25 - - - - 6.33
20.07 3.65 775.38 103.76 0.64 1.43 4.19 - - - - 6.25
20.13 3.60 775.37 103.07 0.64 1.41 4.12 - - - - 6.17
20.20 3.56 775.36 102.39 0.64 1.40 4.05 - - - - 6.09
20.27 3.53 775.35 101.72 0.64 1.39 3.99 - - - - 6.02
20.33 3.49 775.34 101.05 0.64 1.38 3.93 - - - - 5.94
20.40 3.46 775.32 100.41 0.63 1.37 3.87 - - - - 5.87
20.47 3.43 775.31 99.77 0.63 1.35 3.81 - - - - 5.79
20.53 3.41 775.30 99.14 0.63 1.34 3.75 - ---- -- - 5.72
20.60 3.39 775.29 98.54 0.63 1.33 3.68 - - --- - 5.64
20.67 3.37 775.28 97.95 0.63 1.32 3.61 - - - - 5.56
20.73 3.35 775.27 97.38 0.63 1.31 3.54 - - - - 5.48
20.80 3.34 775.26 96.82 0.63 1.30 3.47 -- ----- -- - 5.40
Continues on next page...

u
Pond Routing Page 4
Hydrograph Discharge Table
'
Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Civ B Civ C Civ D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Outflow
(hrs) efs ft Cfs Cfs Cfs Cfs Cfs Cfs Cfs Cfs Cfs
' 20.87 3.33 775.25 96.29 0.63 1.29 3.41 - - - - 5.32
20.93 3.32 775.24 95.77 0.63 1.28 3.34 - - - - 5.25
21.00 3.31 775.23 95.26 0.63 1.27 3.28 - - - - 5.18
' 21.07 3.30 775.22 94.78 0.63 1.26 3.22 5.11
21.13 3.29 775.21 94.31 0.63 1.25 - -
3.17 - -
5.04
21.20 3.29 775.21 93.85 0.63 1.24 3.11 - - - ---- 4.98
' 21.27
21.33 3.28
3.27 775.20
775.19 93.41
92.99 0.63
0.62 1.23
1.22 3.06 - -
3.02 - - 4.92
4.86
21.40 3.26 775.18 92.58 0.62 1.21 2.97 ----- 4.81
21.47 3.25 775.17 92.18 0.62 1.20 2.93 - - - - 4.76
21.53 3.24 775.17 91.79 0.62 1.19 2.89 4.71
' 21.60 3.24 775.16 91.41 0.62 1.18 - _
2.85 - -
4.66
21.67 3.23 775.15 91.05 0.62 1.18 2.81 - - - - 4.61
21.73 3.22 775.15 90.69 0.62 1.17 2.77 4.56
' 21.80 3.21 775.14 90.34 0.62 1.16 -
2.74 -
4.52
21.87 3.20 775.14 90.00 0.62 1.15 -
2.70 _
4.48
21.93 3.19 775.13 89.67 0.62 1.15 2.67 - - - --- 4.43

' 22.00
22.07 3.19
3.18 775.12
775.12 89.35
89.04 0.62
0.62 1.14
1.13 2.63 - -
2.60 - - 4.39
- ----- 4.35
22.13 3.17 775.11 88.74 0.62 1.12 - -
2.57 - - 4.31
22.20 3.16 775.11 88.44 0.62 1.12 2.54 - - - - 4.27
22.27 3.15 775.10 88.15 0.62 1.11 2.51 4.24
' 22.33 3.14 775.10 87.87 0.62 1.10 - _
2.48 - -
4.21
22.40 3.14 775.09 87.60 0.62 1.10 2.46 - - - - 4.18
22.47 3.13 775.09 87.34 0.62 1.09 2.43 4.15
' 22.53 3.12 775.08 87.08 0.62 1.08 -
2.41 - -
4.12
22.60 3.11 775.08 86.82 0.62 1.08 -
2.39 4.09
22.67 3.10 775.07 86.57 0.62 1.07 2.37 - - - - 4.06
22.73 3.09 775.07 86.33 0.62 1.07 2.35 -- - - 4.03
' 22.80 3.08 775.06 86.09 0.62 1.06 2.33 4.01
22.87 3.08 775.06 85.85 0.62 1.05 2.31 - - - - 3.98
22.93 3.07 775.05 85.62 0.62 1.05 2.29 - - - ---- 3.95
23.00 3.06 775.05 85.40 0.62 1.04 2.27 3.93
' 23.07 3.05 775.05 85.17 0.62 1.04 - _
2.25 _ -
3.90
23.13 3.04 775.04 84.95 0.62 1.03 2.23 - - - ----- 3.88
23.20 3.03 775.04 84.74 0.62 1.03 2.21 3
86
' 23.27 3.03 775.03 84.53 0.62 1.02 -
2.20 - -
.
3.83
23.33 3.02 775.03 84.33 0.62 1.02 -
2.18 3.81
23.40 3.01 775.03 84.12 0.62 1.01 2.16 - - - ----- 3.79
23.47 3.00 775.02 83.92 0.62 1.00 2.14 3.77
23.53 2.99 775.02 83.73 0.62 1.00 - -
2.13 _ -
3.74
23.60 2.98 775.01 83.53 0.62 1.00 2.11 - - - - 3.72
23.67 2.97 775.01 83.34 0.62 0.99 2.09 - - - - 3.70
' 23.73 2.97 775.01 83.16 0.62 0.99 2.08 3.68
23.80 2.96 775.00 82.98 0.62 0.98 2.06 -
3.66
23.87 2.95 775.00 82.80 0.62 0.98 2.05 - - - - 3.64
23.93 2.94 775.00 82.62 0.62 0.97 2.03 - 3.62
' 24.00 0.00 774.99 82.34 0.62 0.96 2.00 3.58
...End

i
C?
13 - Reservoir -100 Yr-- Qp = 112.32 cfs
Time (hrs)
/ Hyd. 10
/ Hyd. 13
0 5 10 15 20 25

13 - Reservoir -100 Yr - Max. El. = 779.70 ft
780
778
776
W 775
773
772
0 5 10 15 20 25
Time (hrs)

Reservoir Report
Page 1
Reservoir No. 1 - Front Pond all Surface English
Pond Data
Pond storage is based on known contour areas
Stage / Storage Table
' Stage Elevation
ft ft

L

1

0.00 772.00
1.00 773.00
2.00 774.00
3.00 775.00
4.00 776.00
5.00 777.00
6.00 778.00
7.00 779.00
8.00 780.00
Contour area Incr. Storage Total storage
sqft cult cult
40,607 0 0
43,160 41,884 41,884
45,780 44,470 86,354
48,466 47,123 133,477
51,217 49,842 183,319
54,031 52,624 235,943
56,908 55,470 291,413
59,848 58,378 349,791
62,850 61,349 411,140
Culvert / Orifice Structures
[A] [B] [C] [D]
Rise in = 70.0 2.7 8.0 16.0
Span in = 70.0 2.7 8.0 16.0
No. Barrels = 1 2 1 1
Invert El. ft = 772.00 772.00 774.33 774.33
Length ft = 250.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Slope % = 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
N -Value = .013 .013 .013 .013
Orif. Coeff. = 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60
Multi-Stage = - Yes Yes Yes
Weir Structures
[A] [B] [C] [D]
Crest Len ft = 0.8 1.9 24.0 0.0
Crest El. ft = 776.30 776.30 779.00 0.00
Weir Coeff. = 3.30 3.00 3.00 0.00
Eqn. Exp. = 1.50 1.50 1.50 0.00
Multi-Stage = Yes Yes Yes No
Tailwater Elevation = 0.00 ft
We: AN oudlows have been analyzed under wM and outlet control.
Stage / Storage / Disch arge Ta ble
Stage Storage Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Discharge
ft cult ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs
0.00 0 772.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.00
1.00 41,884 773.00 10.72 0.36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.36
2.00 86,354 774.00 39.43 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 0.52
3.00 133,477 775.00 82.74 0.62 0.98 2.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 3.63
4.00 183,319 776.00 134.22 0.68 1.94 6.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 - 9.36
5.00 235,943 777.00 187.42 0.75 2.57 9.51 1.55 3.32 0.00 - 17.70
6.00 291,413 778.00 225.93 0.80 3.07 11.65 5.85 12.57 0.00 - 33.93
7.00 349,791 779.00 260.00 0.84 3.50 13.45 11.71 25.16 0.00 - 54.66
8.00 411,140 780.00 290.09 0.77 3.35 13.39 18.79 40.35 72.00 - 148.66

' Hydrograph Report
u

L

u

n
?I

Hyd. No. 13
Pond Routing
Hydrograph type = Reservoir Peak discharge
Storm frequency = 100 yrs Time interval
Inflow hyd. No. = 10 Reservoir name
Max. Elevation = 779.70 ft Max. Storage
Storage Wfication me#md used.
Hydrograph Discharge Table
Page 1
English
= 112.32 cfs
= 1 min
= Front Pond all
= 392,584 cuft
Total Volume = 767,312 cuft
Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C Clv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Outflow
(hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs
11.68 24.97 774.58 65.01 0.59 0.22 0.32 - - - - 1.13
11.70 26.30 774.61 66.54 0.59 0.26 0.40 - - - - 1.26
11.72 27.80 774.64 68.17 0.60 0.32 0.51 - - - - 1.42
11.73 29.48 774.68 69.89 0.60 0.38 0.62 - - - - 1.60
11.75 31.37 774.71 71.20 0.60 0.44 0.75 - - - - 1.79
11.77 33.47 774.75 71.71 0.60 0.52 0.90 - - - - 2.02
11.78 35.84 774.79 72.25 0.60 0.61 1.05 - - - - 2.26
11.80 38.52 774.84 74.30 0.61 0.70 1.25 - - - - 2.55
11.82 41.54 774.89 76.75 0.61 0.80 1.46 - - - - 2.87
11.83 44.96 774.94 79.43 0.61 0.88 1.72 - - - - 3.21
11.85 48.81 774.99 82.34 0.62 0.96 2.00 - - - - 3.58
11.87 53.14 775.05 85.41 0.62 1.04 2.27 - - --- - 3.93
11.88 57.99 775.11 88.73 0.62 1.12 2.57 - - - - 4.31
11.90 63.41 775.18 92.41 0.62 1.21 2.96 - ---- - - 4.79
11.92 69.41 775.25 96.46 0.63 1.29 3.43 - - - - 5.35
11.93 75.77 775.33 100.91 0.64 1.38 3.91 - ----- - - 5.93
11.95 82.44 775.42 105.79 0.64 1.46 4.38 ----- --- --- - 6.48
11.97 89.31 775.52 111.11 0.65 1.55 4.87 - ----- - - 7.07
11.98 96.27 775.62 116.10 0.65 1.64 5.34 - - - - 7.64
12.00 103.19 775.73 119.07 0.66 1.74 5.75 - - - - 8.15
12.02 110.01 775.85 125.72 0.67 1.83 6.20 - - ----- - 8.70
12.03 116.71 775.97 132.76 0.68 1.92 6.64 - ----- - - 9.25
12.05 123.26 776.10 139.82 0.69 2.02 7.06 - - - - 9.77
12.07 129.63 776.23 147.05 0.70 2.11 7.48 - - - - 10.29
12.08 135.80 776.37 154.48 0.72 2.20 7.89 0.06 0.13 ---- - 10.99
12.10 141.75 776.52 162.00 0.73 2.29 8.29 0.27 0.58 - - 12.16
12.12 147.45 776.67 169.52 0.73 2.38 8.69 0.59 1.27 - - 13.67
12.13 152.88 776.82 177.53 0.74 2.47 9.08 1.00 2.15 ---- ----- 15.44
12.15 158.02 776.98 186.62 0.75 2.56 9.47 1.49 3.19 - - 17.46
12.17 162.82 777.14 192.98 0.76 2.64 9.83 2.02 4.34 - - 19.59
12.18 167.21 777.29 200.56 0.77 2.72 10.18 2.61 5.60 - - 21.89
12.20 171.14 777.45 206.64 0.78 2.81 10.53 3.26 7.00 - - 24.36
12.22 174.53 777.61 212.97 0.79 2.88 10.86 3.95 8.49 - - 26.98
12.23 177.33 777.77 218.19 0.79 2.96 11.19 4.70 10.09 - - 29.74
12.25 179.45 777.93 223.26 0.80 3.04 11.51 5.48 11.78 - - 32.61
12.27 180.82 778.08 228.90 0.80 3.11 11.81 6.28 13.49 - - 35.48
Continues on next page...
L

n

L

u
I I

Pond Routing Page 2
Hydrograph Discharge Table
Time Inflow Elevation Clv A Clv B Clv C CIv D Wr A Wr B Wr C Wr D Outflow
(hrs) cfs ft cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs cfs
12.28 181.38 < < 778.23 234.19 0.81 3.17 12.09 7.08 15.20 - - 38.35
12.30 181.05 778.38 239.27 0.81 3.24 12.36 7.89 16.95 - - 41.25
12.32 179.76 778.52 244.12 0.82 3.30 12.61 8.71 18.71 ---- - 44.16
12.33 177.81 778.65 248.72 0.83 3.36 12.85 9.53 20.48 - - 47.05
12.35 175.24 778.79 253.06 0.83 3.41 13.08 10.34 22.21 - - 49.88
12.37 172.17 778.91 257.14 0.84 3.46 13.30 11.14 23.92 - - 52.66
12.38 168.77 779.03 260.92 0.84 3.51 13.50 11.90 25.56 0.66 - 55.98
12.40 165.18 779.13 264.25 0.85 3.55 13.67 12.60 27.07 3.73 - 61.47
12.42 161.49 779.23 267.25 0.85 3.59 13.83 13.25 28.46 8.12 - 68.10
12.43 157.71 779.32 269.91 0.84 3.61 13.97 13.84 29.72 12.94 - 74.92
12.45 153.86 779.39 272.23 0.83 3.60 14.09 14.36 30.85 17.78 - 81.51
12.47 149.95 779.46 274.22 0.83 3.58 14.20 14.82 31.84 22.48 - 87.75
12.48 145.99 779.52 275.91 0.82 3.57 14.25 15.22 32.69 26.67 - 93.22
12.50 141.97 779.56 277.32 0.82 3.55 14.20 15.56 33.41 30.46 - 98.00
12.52 137.89 779.60 278.49 0.82 3.54 14.15 15.84 34.01 33.59 ---- 101.96
12.53 133.76 779.63 279.42 0.82 3.53 14.11 16.07 34.50 36.34 - 105.36
12.55 129.58 779.66 280.14 0.81 3.52 14.08 16.24 34.88 38.46 - 108.00
12.57 125.36 779.68 280.68 0.81 3.51 14.05 16.37 35.17 40.03 - 109.95
12.58 121.10 779.69 281.04 0.81 3.51 14.04 16.46 35.36 41.11 - 111.29
12.60 116.81 779.69 281.25 0.81 3.51 14.03 16.51 35.47 41.73 - 112.06
12.62 112.49 779.70 << 281.33 0.81 3.51 14.02 16.53 35.51 41.94 - 112.32 <<
12.63 108.16 779.70 281.27 0.81 3.51 14.03 16.52 35.48 41.78 - 112.12
12.65 103.83 779.69 281.10 0.81 3.51 14.03 16.48 35.39 41.28 - 111.50
12.67 99.49 779.68 280.83 0.81 3.51 14.05 16.41 35.25 40.48 - 110.51
12.68 95.17 779.67 280.47 0.81 3.52 14.06 16.32 35.06 39.42 - 109.19
12.70 90.88 779.65 280.03 0.81 3.52 14.08 16.21 34.82 38.11 - 107.57
12.72 86.62 779.64 279.51 0.82 3.53 14.11 16.09 34.55 36.60 - 105.68
12.73 82.40 779.62 278.93 0.82 3.53 14.13 15.94 34.24 34.88 - 103.55
12.75 78.23 779.59 278.29 0.82 3.54 14.16 15.79 33.91 33.03 - 101.25
12.77 74.13 779.57 277.59 0.82 3.55 14.19 15.62 33.55 31.17 - 98.89
12.78 70.10 779.55 276.84 0.82 3.56 14.21 15.44 33.17 29.17 - 96.37
12.80 66.16 779.52 276.06 0.82 3.56 14.24 15.26 32.77 27.06 - 93.71
12.82 62.31 779.49 275.23 0.83 3.57 14.25 15.06 32.34 24.92 - 90.97
12.83 58.58 779.46 274.37 0.83 3.58 14.21 14.86 31.91 22.85 - 88.24
12.85 54.99 779.43 273.48 0.83 3.59 14.16 14.65 31.47 20.73 - 85.43
12.87 51.56 779.40 272.58 0.83 3.59 14.11 14.44 31.02 18.55 - 82.55
12.88 48.32 779.37 271.64 0.83 3.60 14.06 14.23 30.56 16.56 ---- 79.85
12.90 45.30 779.34 270.70 0.84 3.61 14.01 14.02 30.10 14.58 - 77.16
12.92 42.51 779.31 269.74 0.84 3.62 13.96 13.80 29.64 12.59 - 74.45
12.93 40.00 779.28 268.78 0.84 3.61 13.91 13.59 29.18 10.79 - 71.92
12.95 37.77 779.25 267.82 0.84 3.60 13.86 13.37 28.72 9.11 - 69.52
12.97 35.87 779.22 266.87 0.85 3.59 13.81 13.17 28.28 7.45 - 67.14
12.98 34.30 779.19 265.93 0.85 3.57 13.76 12.96 27.84 5.96 - 64.94
13.00 32.97 779.16 265.00 0.85 3.56 13.71 12.76 27.41 4.73 - 63.02
13.02 31.85 779.13 264.09 0.85 3.55 13.67 12.57 26.99 3.52 - 61.14
13.03 30.89 779.10 263.21 0.85 3.54 13.62 12.38 26.59 2.34 - 59.32
13.05 30.06 779.07 262.34 0.84 3.53 13.57 12.20 26.20 1.69 - 58.03
13.07 29.30 779.05 261.48 0.84 3.52 13.53 12.02 25.82 1.07 -- 56.79
13.08 28.59 779.02 260.64 0.84 3.51 13.48 11.85 25.44 0.46 - 55.58
Continues on next page...

kEELAND and KAUFFMAN, INC.
WmEms • LANo8G4PEA/ecwmcTS
West Stone Avenue
6reenilgle South Carolina 2960.9 Job Job No. Date
telephow 864-233-5497 Computed by
864-233-8915
Checked Sy Date
.
.
€
R FEftEN(E ?alculati n Fdr t E Dis
ipli
i
F ?T
?E _? ? L E F E f € e ? ( ? E
Q%. mc; 171 ir "-7F-
K Qt
'M 12
+s'
.- _ - - €
E - iI
U-1
"0.09 C., o € 54 -?-15
' -•-{- ?? `' ? E € E E t i t € €
14 e?? 1-4 c
010
€? ;^'t F -.?•F t„? !? ` i } .1 SFr
f- T
€ ? € E i !
PREELANP and KAUFFMAN INC.
rw,lvT,:=74PEARcHrmcrs
Greenville, South Carolina 29609 Job Job No. Date
hone864-233-5497 Computed By
864-233-8915
Checked By Date
:
a ,
£
REFERS E Iculati?n For. I {
` ? D15?Ipll
is s. .:. ... <.
:
i.
1 ; P?.."•-?S_ : ? IBS ??
y £ _ ? S t {
I
jE ?? ? 11 1 ! i F t ! € 3 € ? ? 1 !
PILD 41
£ I ?{ I 4 F r £ i
'GZ f
I { . ` { 1 ???r+?T#FF i t i 5
?? ?...l? 1 ? - 4 s ( f ! € ! 1 ( 4 F
a, -4
4t
s ;
e
- - - .. ?t-
a
S { ! of
kREELANP and KAUFFMAN INC.
r6W11V
ERS ? LANDSCAPEAKCHITEGTS
E
9 est Stone Avenue
Greenville. South Carolina 29609 job
phone [phone]
re 864-233-8915
Job No. Date
Computed By
Checked by
Date
f

fZ -FWN

E..

IcUlat

4n Far.
x
a

s t

!I I
s

1

'. ?? 4?F?i' J i1 i i } f t { E t
i
f
1 } { f
S i ? e t
i S i ?
1 ¢
S f
#

1
- tLz?
1
((
i Q j i F F I l j ? 1

` L L { ` ?t

ial SO 4-

r2l
^

F

e

F

f

': -4 f?
??
?
7`-?1'-1
I tom' {
.

f
{ €
f
!
i
a
i +I i 1 j
E F € 1 ? ? ( i
y f
! I ?/ f G i. S i i
f'jo

t
€ 3
f
f ?
i 1
?
f
!
€
-E Li? ?sxd LL

£ £ ?
F 1 i f ? E I ? Y { ? l t f f

`• #
1E
? 1
? F
E
'
F
1
1 #
?
j
F

e 5

i 4 N?7?.Lj_

F
j r s {
I F
i

:
, i

kEELANP and KAUFFMAN, INC.
tIN:Z • CANS 4 1PEARcHnFcT5
Wne Avenue
Greenville. South Carolina 29609 Job
hone 864-233-5497
64233-8915
Job No.
Computed Dy
Checked Dy _
Date
Date
}

FEt ENCIE

calculati

n Far.
:

iplir

}
e.

t

1

s

j
Q 1
- ?CtJ
E
?' ?

i I

t i
?
? t

t
?
`
!

? t
I

{ - t f j € E i I I#
I
t
I € k !
i { ' ? f 1 F € t ?

S=1^ i 4t 1- tA(# E- {'s ©? ?/t 17 ! ' ?'1 p f s ° S
1
i .'?_ 1 j „ t ty fT f
t f €? } 1 't =?` v i ! [
` Fi 1

i
}
? j
5 dLr1"_`;'7? t
?1
?'4 € t
tl !"t. ?• I 4= z:
` t
? -
i
f
_-._ .
€ 1 1{ .
_.
.sue i } l 1 A'f `' T 1 C H r- p i
G ;
Ti E
i .' ,t? ?_t^` ? } i t I ,> € O mss= : :? t ! {c € [ U

E COY/ ;

I i ? i } ? ? ( 1
f { ; ? t

' - 1-= -? -- t _

1 l._ - v '- 1 If-
IREELAND and KAUFFMAN, INC.
r OINEERS LANDSCAMARCHMCTS
9W. Stone Avenue
Greenville. South Carolina 29609 Job
Telephone [phone]
864-233-8915
Job No.
Computed by
Checked Dy_
Date
Date
--- ---
FEtZEW T-- `
E
Paiculati --
?n For.
€ 3

'

:
?

?

{

i

?

i

f

(

W } PJ i t €

V-4-
:G.
f € i i f } t

Irp
-

1 ?-{ ? l € f l ? ? t t {
f
p ( y

?• 15 j It
'
s ??
?? ?
-??}`-------?--?•--- + ?
i / ?
F ? i [
? ISM
[ i
j 1 €
l { i
? F
1
€ !? _ - t?j s i I i l €

CF5

..?.._ _...i.......... .-.?.... M1 1e- ?Sf I ^y i € {cif S?h\ • _I T? t ? t
Ga't ?1 t1 t iFkFj t - 4 f=

<
(
?s
kREELANP and KAUFFMAN, INC.
G/NEEKB • L.4NvSG4YE14RCJi/TECTS
West Stone Avenue
GS•e llle. South Carolina 29609 JOb
Telephone [phone]
I x864233-8915
Job No.
Computed by
CheoWDy
Date
Date

R FEIZEN
tE t
Ga?i3lati -
3n Fdr- €
'

t
I
s

t
m ipli

i
j
s

s

3
i e
i
3

1-4

?

? € t

i

1

? 3

+

l

! .

3

i
'

_i
1
1G?
i S
T,
s
S
lit/
[
t
-n
I
I

14N t Iml I ej4 j i
t IlApf a.,
7 3j i Ii "
_
`F. + c/ i I i

?_
t ? t
? O L 7P 1- t t s
??` t i
t-i f s lJ ci s [ ? ; e
t I
I € `
C?i -6, i 3 F E

??
? (
[
r5 4e-
?
i
i
+ 1
3
f
------ -- -----
\-j Q

P
iDoj
`
3
E
IVP
v ,

t € 1
s
: ` i^

F

t
'

i `• It ?- i \ ? . C .. iA? "rte -i ? F r. ,?-'r'
} r ?'?...rr i... _ .. :ti 14 ..y ? \ `,?? ? •?.: :.??T?,1f`,/ i. ,•, ?.,`.1/ - ••? 1,?? ",J r<? ?? ? ? "l]-' •i
_ / i • ?:.'.,?J}.?' .. ?--, `??-""') ?Y.'' 1 . ?? 'k ?_`-"?/i : m % O%.' co" ?• ,r j i .Fr `??`\ ` i ?`.`.3 mot, !
'{ r, '"?n'''*--c'?•-t'? ??''.? t? ? ----+ r .\ ??:, .p?/?S9' 1, t6; ?,?-? ???.? s????,,.i.. .r?,??i:, .•.
J 1 ••,.,i. •? i?1 •'? v. `?,i.. /?.?0 `?\-f ?? r' „" ?4pCr i ? ?• l?>•tr. r/. ?? i ? ^? r' ? •?-+.... «?'l?? a. 1 D
-?( \?•-•? 1f? ? ,'v.t "-'_?\`c ? ?J??\?? ?\ `L r? j '1o ?`` 1'Z"?t` ?,4 ?. . r ti f??! ?!? • ???J?..???' , ?,?/ '.?y l?.i?
? ?O a. t y ?i:.?'`?1;.`P `; ?: t• ? , ?- i .. ?. mot, ?:; •, ,: •.• ••?J;
^- ?, ? ?1 .ay ?;.?? • '? r? • ?' `\ is ? `?! ?. ` • ? ? I??? t r''` ;,. ?:,?.:: ? _
??J~ •?? Jet; 4 •`?'^y•"?Ci ?? V? v? i^\t?' •.'`v/?j' ??` i !'l I `1??1/i `Y` .',•. •r? •t
- '17
%t n? t. It • ; `r •r , /; ?? \ t -
12 Ish,
tom, :?1+, ?^^?^? -'?: _ .?• ?-? Z.:'?''??'?'?%, : ?(.?;F""??j? - ??; _..:? ?/ `.• -(? `,' ? ` c
" - al .7
a. .%`____'`-! ? ,• ./• ." ??: ?`? `? ? a ,? ? ?-- ` ' ?`j5\'r.ri rt? 'tE `.?k:?'ssi= `e's ? _ ?v
I-V
• -ter ' :.. / ?\ /•1 ' ??J'•. ?? ?'\ '?' ;? ?? `--/ \ .`?,O ,,'/ \ 1 i???.? ? « ?: _
? ' r.y `? j ;?•? t ??r,?t'-_. •wr ;i? ti ? ??,?? ? i `?\-?? S ?' .` "?7'' r^v(\a! rtii ?' ?'' /lO- / /i'.,
> ?'v? / :•• i. i .
' 1...i -?'?'. ?; r}'o1'v nr ?n°,?' .. »r a a`4'_?'' ?,4:•.'?"• • s 1 "fit
/jig
'\ ? ? ?_ I, \??-.Ji''? '9+ /' i .5"?' '?, j?t. l `_,?Jr/..\?,. - ?. ' - .mss'- + ? ?? -7%?? ? ? ? •.:%
;.i ?^°,. ,s' j/ / ?"-""-•? ..?< ?? `- j ; ? ?\` r• y? tom; ,.'?•.
kEELANE) and KAUFFMAN INC.
t lm-mRS • L.AN05G4mARCHITECT5
West Stone Avenue
Job Job No. Gree"Alle, South Carolina 29609 Date
IgFphone&64-233-5497 Computed By
864-233-8915
Checked By Date
€
€
. i
Rf=FEREN(IE alcuiati n For. 11 1 '
. < Dis?ipli
< 3 f ?.. i
[ i ? t
<
i
I ( F t I ?,a r.i C?iu f --It i
e;?, ? j ; ?7 i t' F V f '3 i
_; ' all E. i.,' w1
i. +-t" ° t 3 f !
T 4-&1 P11
€ i ? € ? i ? ; ? i
kli
44! 4"
r? P= p
----R-11 4 f € {? ;- --- - t
F- i4> !ps
( -..yam _.... £ E{ e 3 1 I f I {
4- 4
S13, he A
«-'i!FT E t E i i °? ; I I
; ? ? Sheet -?
IREELANO and KAUFFMAN, INC.
LNF_ERS • LANUSCAPEARCHITECTS
West Stone Avenue
Greenville. South Carolina 29609 Job Job No. Date
864-233-5497 Computed by
x864-233-8915
Checked By Date
l
E
.
RrFEIZEN E iCalculatio'n Far° 3 l' i Di € iplirre: i
-4) 7 Lk
€ E f - ? € I? € If E € f i ? €
F ? r
??r,F._ 1 € F tt
[ ?? i i ; ; F ° 1 1 # l
to -A P Ta
LLJ
f f O f i ?' l' l7 ? ( €t i 1 E ! ?
} 1 t 1• l i E f i t{j
-71
99
-112i Ae-
_? pp €
:i:i: A
A
-- -- r-q... Z
___.._ t ( _ ;
f
i A
€^ S 1 i f E € # 1 4 i E € '
> t [
:
' i
f s 7
IZEELAND and KAUFFMAN, INC.
/NEERS • LANDSG4PEARCHITECTS

nue
West Stone Ave
GreemMe, South Carolina 29609 Job Job No. Date
kkphone&64-233-5497 computed By
1 864-233-8915
Checked By Date
......... R
j F [

i

i t .
1
i {{
f
FER ENOE Calculatibn For i t
_

?
jg

1. Soo ?it i ?U TS .41Z. Q? O 11 4

VI!
E i { V' l
E Z
65
9
f
7A
to
)

`
4-'4-
?
(
F
i F
i
I
'1 A a

! € ? 4 1 i s e i F ( s 1 F ? 1 i
t
1 L t 4 -? { F 1 ? •-I W? V TS {

j t ?
l - -- -- - - -* - - E s F - ?

a
4 ? F
IREELAND and KAUFFMAN, INC.
fmEps • Lmvsc4PEARCHmcrs
West Stone Avenue
Greenville, South Carolina 29609 Job
Telephone [phone]
r 864-233-8915
Job No. Date
Computed By
Checked By Date
R FEREN E Plculatibn Far. t1T ?? t tJi E
t

f DiIpli ?
1t
1 i f { F{
I
1 (} ?
-j x-
{ E
I
t f
(_ f ?
E
{
( {p
4
f
Tw l I
? f
t S i

f i I
{ -??
s
? E ? f
f ? ? l [ t ( E i-?_ t
F k
t
yy i 1{
?E?"ir"
f ? f i !
'
^

_# y_
u
' i ;G 4 t
l c' E r1b
lei
41
05c
I I
T
i
r
-- ?- st t5TI!?- € ll wcjrs itA `t- L I ° Tb
4 3

-i ---F
-
? .-
_
•_-i -_.. .-..F f
5
F
t
?
--j
-
t
E
F
I
14-
t
r` ?
y
? ?¢ E LJ
1-4
.E
I

!

f (
...........

`

f

(
-7-1. -7 f

E
.14

i

E 7

{

[ f { ? f
l
f
t
II??

tt rlFl ` E! f
f

(
f
•
'

11
: ? -
t _
€ 4 ? S f T i f
i f
i
f
kREELANP and KAUFFMAN, INC.
*vOwEERS • LANOSCAPEARCH/TEGTS
9 West Stone Avenue
Greenville. South Carolina 29609 Job Job No. Date
Telephone [phone] Computed 13Y
x864-255-8915
Checked BY Date
----
f
l .
E1ZEN E ? ak Ulati n For. i ' scipfill 6-,
i
s i { i ( { i i i
? :t
Yea
f f
{-} fly 1 1 l ?Y _?,??-? F
0 45
Jb"
14- P2 '-Mp
f::w fz-
ILE&
i - _ ?Z;.?t.-rF -v`-'•?`'° t tom..., ?e''. "ti t { f#- p !{ f
H-jfl
J\Z
14
€ ?i €
_?i...__.___`j..__._. __.?..? it .s-- t, 1f l i ?-? ,•.? ?. ! ;,o j ?. ; l i i
l ° € t. t
Er 1, IrT ?:r
f
l
f i
i !
i I Sh ? of
LELANP and KAUFFMAN INC.
rW,m=,=rEAkcHrrEcr5
G Date
reenville, South Carolina 29609 Job Job No.
hone 664-233-5497 Computed Dy
864-233-89t5
Checked By Date
t t
R?FEREN E Palciat! n For. € 1 D'iscipli s
} ?"_ _(, `? L? s LET t < ?•"' {_„ 6?i+ i i
} _- _ _ i ! -G Ot t s "? tt't } r>: i O '_t
t } t t ?i 'ti - ? F? tE { ? ° f ! € 3 t E
?ti<
i € r t ! ? f ? i t €
! }I.^ r'A's L C 1 -f-t` ? { C ?-?-_ }
A= t : _ ! !? t }? ! E t L
--.`.•...,. < f? t tc..€ ' < t S € aL1 f°"-,_; k :'? 'jam e t ?? t
l id } Sib -All 4-;? t lt?
41-
1
!
E ?Y+ ; ? Imo. i i i t
A, IP4 !
?1 gt 1'14_._?f Ar? i
AT
t
1
} ! -
1 4--
f
Q
LELAND and KAUFFMAN INC.
tINEERS ' LAN?APEARGH/TEGTS
West Stone Avenue
Date
Greenville, South Carolina 29609 Job Job No.
TAkphonc864-233-54.97 Computed by
664-253-8915
-j''--- -; C'hecked by Date
FEt EN(E Caiculati n Fctr. Disci O
€ F F ,
Lam! i L f ? Ij t
F r f ? f f ? 1 t I F j f {
f _ .? __ i F 4 3 f j t 1
( t t {
'? ? t ( I f
E i .. _-?Y? ! 7 f F t
\1
i i i S ? i ? { F F S i t
j' '. ? F ? € I t t f
S i t ' ( ? e j 1 j
41
r A,
_ ? -,_t? r ?,1 t 1
-21 AA f
14. 44 In, f l t i € i f i
12 -1&1 IY €( t f i aT ! -`-? ? ? f
E f l i ? j ` ? t 7
71
?. f
:
•
: ? 1 f
t Z €
t € f
t
a
,
i of
tREELANP and KAUFFMAN, INC.
G/NEERS • LAWSGAPEAKCHTMOG
West Stone Avenue
reenville, South Carona 29609 Job Job NO. Date .
Telephone [phone] Computed 13y
864-233-8915
Checked BY Date
!
! !
!
FEfEN FE Iculati n For § ! i i --
ii
f€ s
4
.__ E -,^ § € to
A-4 ?J
-35
1 17 -7 k"
F i -? f i •? € ! ? !
09
- F ! €
i f € € §
ter,
§ i i f € 5 i ?
f
i • • 4
het

u
I I

u
n

1

u

APPENDIX E
Site Photographs
23

Photo 1. Waters in Area I
Photo 2. Existing Culvert in Area I under Hanes Mall Boulevard

0

0

1?

Photo 3. Existing Waters in Area II
Photo 4. Existing Waters in Area II

I I

I I

r

H

I-'
L
Photo 5. Existing Culvert in Area II under Hanes Mall Boulevard

Photo 6. Eroded Wetlands in Area II at Confluence with Main Stem

'I

11

i

0

n
w

Photo 1. Waters in Area I
Photo 2. Existing Culvert in Area I under Hanes Mall Boulevard

?r
h. c •N •? {C i,
A
1
Photo 3. Existing Waters in Area II
Photo 4. Existing Waters in Area 11

I
I

0

Photo 5. Existing Culvert in Area II under Hanes Mall Boulevard
,4,
?? r Z ? -j"Y Mkt -?
.f
rrt<

Photo 6. Eroded Wetlands in Area II at Confluence with Main Stem