20031589 Ver 1_Complete File_20030830

o?0? w A
Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
p
liii;?Smvlv 'C Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
February 16, 20Cu
DWQ Project No. 03-1589
County: Beaufort
William G. Frey
324 Stephen Way
Belhaven, NC 27810
Subject Property: 324 Stephen Way, Belhaven, NC 27810
Pungo Creek [03-03-07, 29-34-35, SC NSW nutrient sensitive)]
A010"VAL of Tar-Pa .Ilco Rlver Buffer Rut; (15A NCAC 0216.021;9) AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATE
Dear Mr. Frey:
You have our approval in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0259 anc any conditions listed below, to impact
approximately 2,500 W of the protected riparian buffers for the purpos a of installing the proposed retaining wall and fill at
the subject property as described within your application dated Decen Iber 1, 2003. In addition, you should obtain or
otherwise comply with any other required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including
(but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control, Non-discharge and CAMA regulations. This approval is only valid for
the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your project, you must notify us and you
may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this
authorization and approval letter and is thereby responsible for compl /ing with all conditions. For this approval to be valid,
you must follow the conditions listed below.
Conditions:
1. Diffuse Flow - An additional condition is that all stormwater shall t e directed as diffuse flow at non-erosive velocities
through the protected stream buffers and will not re-concentrate tefore discharging into the stream as identified within
15A NCAC 2B.0233(5).
2. Certificate of Completion - Upon completion of all work approved within this authorization, and any subsequent
modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North
Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Ra.l,3igh, NC, 27699-1650.
3. CAMA Line Setback - The retaining wall and fill must be kept at least fifteen (15) feet from the Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA) / Division of Coastal Management (DCIA) coastal wetland line.
Any disputes over determinations regarding this Authorization Certific ate (associated with the approved buffer impacts)
shall be referred in writing to the Director for a decision. The Directors decision is subject to review as provided in
Articles 3 and 4 of G.S. 1508. This Authorization Certificate shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. This
letter completes the review of the "No Practical Alternatives" determination under 15A NCAC 213.0259. If you have any
questions or would like a copy of the buffer rules, please call [phone]. This letter does not authorize any impacts
to either Waters of the United States or Waters of the State. Please (ontact the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) or
NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ) if any impacts are proposed to a ther of these waters.
Sincerely,
cc: DWQ Washington Regional Office
File Copy
Central Office
Kllme .E:.
Q, Director
a[A@[R5V[R I
MAR 1 4 2005
DENR - WATER QUALITY
WETLANDS AND STORMINATER BRANCH
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, WETLANDS / 401 UNIT
1650 Mall Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Addre :s)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh NC 27604.2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc. is/ncwetlands/

1hr
64?IX e;7)1 ?

OF W A TFR Michael F. Easley
\O? pG Governor
Uj William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
] Department of Environment and Natural Resources
p 'C Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
February 16, 2004
DWQ Project No. 03-1589
County: Beaufort
William G. Frey
324 Stephen Way
Belhaven, NC 27810
Subject Property: 324 Stephen Way, Belhaven, NC 27810
Pungo Creek [03-03-07, 29-34-35, SC NSW (nutrient sensitive)]
APPROVAL of Tar-Pamlico River Buffer Rule (15A NCAC 026 .0259) AUTHORIZATION CERTIFICATE
Dear Mr. Frey:
You have our approval, in accordance with 15A NCAC 02B .0259 and any conditions listed below, to impact
approximately 2,500 ft2 of the protected riparian buffers for the purpose of installing the proposed retaining wall and fill at
the subject property as described within your application dated December 1, 2003. In addition, you should obtain or
otherwise comply with any other required federal, state or local permits before you go ahead with your project including
(but not limited to) Erosion and Sediment Control, Non-discharge and CAMA regulations. This approval is only valid for
the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your project, you must notify us and you
may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold, the new owner must be given a copy of this
authorization and approval letter and is thereby responsible for complying with all conditions. For this approval to be valid,
you must follow the conditions listed below.
Conditions:
1. Diffuse Flow - An additional condition is that all stormwater shall be directed as diffuse flow at non-,erosive velocities
through the protected stream buffers and will not re-concentrate before discharging into the stream as identified within
15A NCAC 2B.0233(5).
2. Certificate of Completion - Upon completion of all work approved within this authorization, and any subsequent
modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North
Carolina Division of Water Quality, 1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
3. CAMA Line Setback - The retaining wall and fill must be kept at least fifteen (15) feet from the Coastal Area
Management Act (CAMA) / Division of Coastal Management (DCM) coastal wetland line.
Any disputes over determinations regarding this Authorization Certificate (associated with the approved buffer impacts)
shall be referred in writing to the Director for a decision. The Director's decision is subject to review as provided in
Articles 3 and 4 of G.S. 150B. This Authorization Certificate shall expire five (5) years from the date of this letter. This
letter completes the review of the "No Practical Alternatives" determination under 15A NCAC 26 .0259. If you have any
questions or would like a copy of the buffer rules, please call [phone]. This letter does not authorize any impacts
to either Waters of the United States or Waters of the State. Please contact the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) or
NC Division of Water Quality (DWQ) if any impacts are proposed to either of these waters.
Sincerely,
cc: DWQ Washington Regional Office
File Copy
Central Office
. Klimek, E.
Q, Director
North Carolina Division of Water Quality, WETLANDS / 401 UNIT
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1650 (Mailing Address)
2321 Crabtree Blvd., Raleigh, NC 27604-2260 (Location)
919-733-1786 (phone), 919-733-6893 (fax), http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands/
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dorney Regional Contact: tom steffens
Non-Discharge Branch WO Supervisor: nnPr Thorpe
Date:
SUBJECT: WETLAND STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Facility Name William G. Frey County Beaufort
Project Number 03 1589 County2
Recvd From APP Region Washington
Received Date 12/18/03 Recvd By Region
Project Type retaining wall
Certificates Stream
Permit Wetland Wetland Wetland Stream Class Acres Feet
Type Type Impact Score Index Prim. Supp. Basin Req. Req.
TPBR Buffers FT-0-
Y O N 29-34-35 SC NSW 30,307.
Mitigation Wetland
MitigationType Type Acres Feet
Is Wetland Rating Sheet Attached? 0 Y 0 N Did you request more info? 0 Y 0 N
Have Project Changes/Conditions Been Discussed With Applicant? 0 Y 0 N
Is Mitigation required? 0 Y O N Recommendation: 0 Issue 0 Issue/fond 0 Deny
Provided by Region: Latitude (ddmmss) Longitude (ddmmss)
Comments:
Issue as protection of an existing structure, 15' retaining. wall as measured from theDCM marsh line.
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 1
Facility Name William G. Frey County Beaufort
Project Number 03 1589 Regional Contact:
Date:
Comments (continued from page 1):
tom steffens
cc: Regional Office
Central Office Page Number 2
a?
0
U
0
u

o C o a o
c ,,
a?
O
w
4?
j y N N
c y G 4.
O
°' ? 3 O N
C
x 3 C o a
a y c? v c? c? v U c?
??C7a aZ?
M ° E
o
ts v
?
cts A
ELI c
u

U U) 0 U a?
x b4.
? -,1-4 1.-0 ?-4 ?-4?.1-4 *-4 .?

(D A A 17 ti A ?
'
N 17
N N N N --+ N N
-+
M
b N N
U
N

C) CD CD

N
CC
C
F CC E C CC
E
Q u
U u U

G>
w N
w N U
ww N U U N N G? N N
wwwwwwww N
w U
w
b
3 M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
U
Con
N
m
cn
l!1 N
A 4-
b u Q
o ° U
ova U ? U o 0 0
U 0
8 o ° cn
N bb
4. N 03 cn
°O o maw"('? = C7
o ° 3 cj
u u xFo-000UQ WdU ti
1,21
N
cd O O O? M ct 00 It r- N N ? r- O\ 00 D1
° -O 00 l- O? 110 W) O O N r- ? O O N
y U 0 0 0 %10 O M O O O
? C V 'b i, --i?+?000OO?OO O
A E-y V v a O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O
a.,
v
g
N
N
N
w
O
v]
i
> ?

p
o -
o a o N
41

2
a
o
b
°
bbDo
w
?' p

3
v > o 3
c? (? • 0 (? cd ? ? ? f y
o ? /]
a
o
O a o o
N v. ? o W G.
4 "
'A=
2 o
Q a?i a? Q A °'
° t o
O ?
' o ? O X
U 0F'?M 0F'?'1
R aa
na?;?
°
o o
>
x i4 H H z w z d ° ?

w
ww ti
w
O M O N
M
00 00 00
-- ?
? ?
O O O O

w ww w w w
M MM M M ?

CIO
U
?
? ? "cJ CG
U v? fx
cn

a?
E
a, o E
?O t O M 00 0
_ v
O O O O O O ?'
It I?h It It It
O 00 O O O r• +.
a.
v
g
N
N
N
w
O
N
O
N
L
cz
N
O
cz
a--0
O
L
CL
i
cz

?? 0 0 0 0
/?
Q TT co co
yy.
o T
a \
N T
a T
a
L
.
0
'C
>
M M M M

4- O O

a _O
00 O
0)
?o T
oc a a a a
O T T T T
U

75 75 75
? Y Y Y ?

U U U 0
a?
v

O O O O O
CC Cc CC cr
o
.
5
4)
oc
C
0
cn
-0 0 co .5;

o
r- 2
?
c
N (D
>
0
N
.o cr O Z m
IL o
0
2 U 0

H
CD

co co "t 0
d LO LO LO ?
T T T T
co co co co
O O O O
++ L
0
U

N
C'
M
v
c
e?
to
C
N
t?
8
0
G1?
E
ro
1

Date:. - 12- I-)_2 Q 3
To:
From:
? ARO
? FRO
? MRO
? RRO
Telephone : (919)33 l?
The file attached is being forwarded to dour for your evaluation.
Please call if you need assistance.
? Stream length impacted
? Stream determination
? Wetland determination and distance to blue-line surface waters on USFW topo maps
? h inimization/avoidance issues
Buffer Rules (Meuse, Tar-Pamlico, Catawba, Randleman)
? Pond fill
? Mitigation Ratios
? Ditching
? ' Are the stream and or wetland mitigation sites available and viable?
? Check drawings for accuracy
? Is the application consistent with pre-application meetings?
Cumulative impact concern
Comments:
Triage Check List
Name:
Project
DWQ#: - S
County: AP?W_
Mike Parker WaRO Tom Steffens
I X
Ken Averitte ? WiRO Noelle Lutheran
Alan Johnson ? WSRO Daryl Lamb
Steve Mitchell
c ?
dY\-
( L
4p, 5 %zi
1
M6t_
An
OFFICE USE ONLY: Date Received Request
i i@
State of Noft Carolina
Department of Environment and Natural Resources ? r _ 2 i 3
Division of Water Quality
Variance Re uest For ?' WQ ???????
q m - for Minor Variances
Protection and Maintenance of Riparian Amas Rules
NOTE.' This form may be photocopied for use as an origir E 4?'r
Please identify which Riparian Area ProtecrJon Rule appIAf4,FCT
o Neuse River Basin: Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management rategy
Protection and Maintenance of Ripariari Areas Rule (15A NCAC .0233)
hd/Tar-Pamlico River Basin: Nutrient Sent; tive Waters Management
Strategy Protection and Maintenance o•P Riparian Areas Rule (15A
NCAC.0259)

Part 1: General Information
(Please include affechments ff the room provided is insufficient.)
1. Applicant's name (the corporation, individual, etc. w -,o owns the property):
2. Print Owner/Signing Ofitlcral (person legally responsi ale for the property and its compliance)
Name:
Title:
Street address: Sa=o%? r? •%
City, State, Zip: fix/ /?.???:J ?c/G 7ia
Telephone: _Z.3a ?-
Fax: (_,
3. Contact person who can answer questons about th,! proposed project:
Name: Telephone. l )
Fax: jr, --
Email:
4. Project Name (Subdivision, facility, or establishmen: name - consistent with project name on
plans, specifications, letters, operation and mainten. i nce agreements, etc.):
5. Project Location:
Street address: 207 ST- 1? l
City, State, Zip: - O
County:
Version 1: February 2000
c
L.atitudeAongitude,. 30. 03 0_ Al --Al 49
-!F?O 1-?
6. Directions to site from nearest major intersection (Ale o, attach an 8 'A x 11 copy of the USGS
topographic map indicating the location of the site):
-?Z61,KZZ-d 77,
Y, . 7o S bWZ;F y le"D- L . 7:?e, i . //?/ sC/ -.;-t r /' - v . -r

7. Stream to be impacted by the proposed activity:
Stpsm name (for unnamed streams label as "UT' to the nearest named stream):
Strea classification las identified 'thin the Schedule of Classifications 15A NCAC 28.0315
(Neuse) or .0316 (Tar-Pamlico)): ?r.?o ?'.2/!. il.?,? s ?%?T ?0??•yT`v ?2, %- .? ,? tT
Which of the following permits/approvals will be required or have been received already for
this project?
Required: Received: Date received: PerTiit Type:
?Ci,iAA Major
C?JAA Minor
I I [ i. [a 11 111
Or.site Wastewater Permit
NFIDES Permit (including stormwater)
Nc ri-discharge Permit
Wier Supply Watemihed Variance-
Ot i ers (specify)
Part 2: Proposed Activity
(Please include attachments if the room provided is insufcient,)„g/i2,?.U
Description of proposed activity [Also, please attach, i map of sufficient detail (such as a plat
map or site plan) to accurately delineate the boundar i is of the land to be utilized in carrying
out the activity, the location and dimension of any dis, lirbance in the riparian buffers
associated with the activity, and the extent of riparian ')uffsm on the land. include the area
of buffer Impact in ft=.: 7
2.
3
Description of any best management practices to be used to control impacts associated with
the proposed activity (i.e., control of runoff from Imps; ivious surfaces to provide diffuse flow,
fe..plNtng vegetation or enhancement of existing vegetation, etc.) ,
S

oAkn1j +at Form. Dag* 2
G?'x i ;v
State reasons why this plan for the proposed activity : annot be practically accomplished,
reduced or reconfigured to better minimize or eliminEIe disturbance to the riparian buffers:
a :
,?

ff,cJ1? ?J ? ..? S? r=!-lye,, r-
4. Please provide an explanation of the following:
(1) The practical difficulties or hardships that would n it ult from the strict application of this
Rule.
D ?_ ?/? T'ctyT.,?? _A12? ?hc i•U y' _ ? ?o Ste, O C tJc /CJ hoc-laid
(2) How these difficult)es or hardships result from coiii iitions that are unique to the property
involved.
(3) If economic hardship is the major consideration, tien include it specific explanation of the
economic hardships and the proportion of the hardO,, i:) to the entire value of the project.
r -9of9 //^, ,a G' sycli L ir. i/' -„ /' -J- ..f//. _ Z. - r-) -i± - - ,
1 -777
Part 3: Deed Restrictions
By your signature in Part 5 of this application, you certify chat all structural stormwater best
management practices required by this variance shall be located in recorded stormwater
easements, that the easements will run with the land, thir the easements cannot be changed or
deleted without concurrence from the State, and that the oasements will be recorded prior to the
sale of any lot,
Part 4: Agent Authorization
if you wish to designate submittal authority to another ind vidual or firm so that they may provide
information on your behalf, please complete this section:
Designated agent (individual or firm): ze-2t) i _
Mailing address:
City, State, Zip:
Telephone:
Fax: _
Email:
Part 5: Applicant's Certification
i, (print or type name of person listed
in Part I, item 2), certify that the information included on fits permit application form is correct,
that the project will be constructed in conformance with i Ire approved plans and that the deed
restrictions in accordance ' Part 5 of this form will a •ecorded with all required permit
conditions.
Signature:
Date: -
Title: 1aL17-
Variance Request Form, page 3
Version 1: February 2000
h? ?I
rod ?L L -?•r ?- v"
kf r1 ?'?V i?/4 BALL
we T?-,4ivb / ? ? ?
.
- - -- - ? -- moo- -- ---- -- - '_ ?-
n - - '`-1 - -- ----
_ 1
It.
O M CE
? r
E -,+ CZ
- - - 41 --- ----
r
r"

lz
-L5 -
1
1 i / ?