NC0005266_permit issuance_20081024

NPDBS DOCUWENT SCANNINK COVER SHEET
NPDES Permit:
NC0005266
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Complete File - Historical
Engineering Alternatives (EAA)
Staff Report
Instream Assessment (67b)
Speculative Limits
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Document Date:
October 24, 2008
This document is printed on reuse paper - ignore aay
ooiitent on the reverse side

Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
October 24, 2008
Joseph R. Hoeflein, P.E.
Plant Environmental Manager
Louisiana-Pacific Corporation -Roaring River
P.O. Box 98
Roaring River, North Carolina 28669
Subject: Issuance of NPDES Permit NCO05266
LP Corporation -Roaring River WWTP
Wilkes County
Dear Mr. Hoefiein:
Division personnel have reviewed and approved your application for renewal of the subject permit.
Accordingly, we are forwarding the attached NPDES discharge permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the
requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North
Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency dated October 15, 2007 (or as subsequently amended).
This final permit includes no major changes from the draft permit sent to you on August 13, 2008.
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are unacceptable to
you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of this
letter. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina
General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings (6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North
Carolina 27699-6714). Unless such demand is made, this decision shall be final and binding.
Please note that this permit is not transferable except after notice to the Division. The Division may require
modification or revocation and reissuance of the pemut. This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain
other permits which may be required by the Division of Water Quality or permits required by the Division of Land
Resources, the Coastal Area Management Act or any other Federal or Local governmental permit that may be
required. If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Sergei Chemikov at telephone number
[phone].
Sincerelye.K
O Coleen H. Sullins
cc: Central Files
Winston-Salem Regional Office, Surface Water Protection
Roosevelt Childress, EPA Region IV
NPDES Files
N. C. Division of Water Quality / NPDES Unit Phone: [phone]
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 fax: [phone]
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us DENR Customer Service Center: 1 800 623-7748

Permit NC0005266
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provisions of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful
standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Water Quality
Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended,
Louisiana Pacific Corporation
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at the
LP Roaring River Plant
Off NC Highway 268
West of Roaring River
Wilkes. County
to receiving waters designated as the Yadkin River in the Yadkin River Basin in accordance with the
discharge limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III, and
IV hereof.
This permit shall become effective December 1, 2008.
This permit and the authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on September 30, 2013.
Signed this day October 24, 2008
✓'^ oleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
By the Authority of the Environmental Management Commission

Permit NC0005266
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
All previous NPDES Permits issued to this facility, whether for operation or discharge, are hereby
revoked. [The exclusive authority to operate this facility arises under this permit. The authority
to operate the facility under previously issued permits bearing this number is no longer effective.]
The conditions, requirements, terms and provisions of this permit authorizing discharge under
the NPDES govern discharges from this facility.
Louisiana Pacific Corporation
Roaring River Wastewater Treatment Plant
is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue to operate a combined wastewater treatment system consisting of:
➢ 0.03 MGD extended aeration package plant with sludge holding tank for
treatment of sanitary wastes
➢ 2.0 MGD industrial waste treatment system. with the following components:
• Bar screen and/or in -line grinder
• Influent pump station
• Primary. clarifier
• Dissolved air flotation unit
• Pumps
• Sludge holding and mixing tank
• Sludge thickener
• Solids dewatering system consisting of two "S" roll filter presses 8s conveyor system
• Two aeration lagoons
• Nutrient addition system
• Secondary clarifier
• Two emergency primary settling basins
• Effluent mixing box
This facility is located at Louisiana Pacific's facility in Roaring River, located
off NC Highway 268 west of Roaring River in Wilkes County.
2. Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached
map into the Yadkin River, currently classified C waters in the Yadkin -Pee
Dee River Basin.

Latitude: 36011'38" Sub -Basin: 03-07-01
Longitude: 81°01' 59"
uad M C14NE
Stream Class: C
Receiving Stream: Yadkin River
Permitted Flow: 1 to 1.5 MGD
Facility
Location
-Agov-
LP Corporation
North Roaring River Plant

Permit NC0005266
A. (1 ) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS [001]
During the period. beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting until expiration, the
Permittee is authorized to discharge from Outfall 001 (combined process and sanitary wastewater).
Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specked below:
PARAMETER s �X
° E
n
' r LIMITS
41 .n l
I '_ "y
MONITOIN RG'REQUIREMENTS' , Y Z
�, S . t-
Moathl
a Y
Average
, 7 Dailyr`,
_ Maximum k
Measurement
Fy
,,; requencyn:
:..
`Sample.,
Type
f- r
;Location)
Flow
2.0 MGD
Continuous
Recording
Influent or
Effluent
BOD-5, 20°C
11,873 pounds/day
22,747 pounds/day
Daily
Composite
Effluent
Total Suspended Solids
12,000pounds/day
18,000pounds/day
Daily
Composite
Effluent
Total Phenolics
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
Total Residual Chlorine
Monthly
Grab
Effluent
COD
3/Week
Composite
Effluent
Temperature
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Temperature
Week
See Footnote 1
Grab
U, D(1), D(2)
Dissolved Oxygen
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Dissolved Oxygen
Week
See Footnote 1
Grab
U, D(1), D(2)
Conductivity
Dail
Grab
Effluent
Conductivity
'
3/Week
See Footnote 1
Grab
U, D(1), D(2)
Settleable Solids
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Total Nitrogen
NO2 + NO3 + TKN
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Total Phosphorus
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Chronic Toxicity 2
Quarterly
Composite .
Effluent
Boron
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Total Zinc
Quarterly
Cornosite
Effluent
H
> 6.0 and < 9.0 standard units
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Notes:
1. U: upstream at least 100 feet above the outfall. D: downstream (1) approximately 1.7 miles at
NCSR 2327 and (2) approximately 8 miles at NCSR 2303. Instream samples shall grab samples
and shall be conducted -three times per week during June,July, August, and September and
weekly during the remaining months of the year.
Instream monitoring is provisionally waived is light of the permittee's participation is the
Yadkin - Pee Dee River Basin Association. Instream monitoring shall be conducted as
stated in this permit should the permittee end its participation in the Association.
2. Chronic Toxicity (Ceriodaphnia) P/F at 1.3%; January, April, July, and October [see Condition'A.
(3)]-
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.

Permit NC0005266
A. (2) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS [602]
During the period beginning on the effective date of this permit and lasting'until expiration, the
Permittee is authorized to discharge from internal Outfall 002 (sanitary wastewater) into the
junction box for Outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as
specified .below:
PARAMETER
N
LIMIT
M NI RIN
TOGREQUIREM NT rf
4 ry F
YE
Mon-11 thly * '
; fl Daily
Measuremeat
� Sample
x
Maxiinum, ''
Fre
-
,{� ue'n'c M
A.
Flow -
0.03 MGD
Instantaneous
Influent or
Effluent
BOD-5, 20°C
30.0 (mg/L)
45.0 (mg/L)
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Total Suspended Solids
30.0 m /L
45.0 m /L
Quarterly'
Grab
Effluent
pH .
> 6.0 and < 9.0 standard units
Quarterly
Grab
Effluent
Notes:
1. • Effluent = prior to mixing with any other wastestream.
Although minimal monitoring is stipulated through this outfall, the permittee is required, through
proper operation and maintenance, to meet minimum secondary treatment levels for sanitary
wastewater. Should inspection sampling results indicate levels of BODS or TSS over the amounts
specified above, enforcement action may be initiated against the permittee.
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
A. (3) CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (Quarterly)
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or, significant
mortality to Ceriodaphnia dubia at an effluent concentration of: 1.3% at 2.0 MGD
The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, _quarterly monitoring using test procedures outlined
in the "North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised February 1998,
or subsequent versions or "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure"
(Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions. The tests will be performed during the months of
January, April, July, and October. Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the
NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in a failure or ChV
below the permit limit, then multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum,
in each of the two following months as described in "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole
Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions.
The chronic value for multiple concentration tests will be determined using the geometric mean of the
highest concentration having no detectable impairment of reproduction or survival and the lowest
concentration that does have a detectable impairment of reproduction or survival. The definition of
"detectable impairment," collection methods, exposure regimes, and further statistical methods are
specified in the "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -
February 1998) or subsequent versions.

Permit NC0005266
A. (3) CHRONIC TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (Quarterly), continued
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) f9r the months in which tests were performed, using the
parameter code TGP3B for the pass/fail results and THP3B for the Chronic Value. Additionally, DWQ
Form AT-3 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: NC DENR / DWQ / Environmental Sciences Section
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Branch no
later than 30 days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and
all concentration/response data, and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved
designate signature. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and
reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is
required, the permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT)
test form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of
the report with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The report shall be
submitted to the Environmental Sciences Branch at the address cited above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required,
monitoring will be required during the following month.
If the Permittee monitors any pollutant more frequently then required by this permit, the results of
such monitoring shall be included in the calculation & reporting of the data submitted on the DMR &
all AT Forms submitted.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re-
opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum
control organism survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental
controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed
no later than the last day of the month following the month of the initial monitoring.
A. (4) OVERFLOW REPORTING
Any bypass of the measuring box or overflow from the cut in the mixing box should be reported to the
Regional Office within 24 hours.

VVT,C,cuminents on Louisiana Pacific Corp permit
Subject: WRC comments on Louisiana Pacific Corp permit
From: Trish MacPherson <[e-mail]>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2008 16:09:32 -0400
To: Sergei Chernikov <[e-mail]>
Sergei,
I received the comments you sent from WRC asking for special benthos sampling of the Yadkin River
above and below the permitted facility. Looking at a map of where they requested samples and where
we have basin sites that were sampled in 2006, I think we covered that portion of the Yadkin River fairly
well.
They asked for an above site at Bridge Rd and we have a basin site within 1/2 mile at NC 18/268 in
North Wilkesboro. It was Excellent in 2006.
They asked for 3 downstream samples and we have two basin sites below. The Yadkin R at US 21 in
Elkin is one,of the sites they requested. It was Good in 2006. Our other Yadkin R site is in Surry Co,
below Rockford where they said the DO sag ended.
Analysis of any Yadkin River data is complicated by the fact that the Wilkesboro WWTP is also above
the US 21 site, and the Roaring River comes in below the discharge, and unless you sample immediately
above and below a discharger, it is harder to say what is causing a change in water quality. Based at
least on the 2006 data, there is no problem in the Yadkin R below this discharger. In fact, our last basin
report noted improving water quality in the section near Elkin.
I think our basin sampling covers the area they requested.
C2
,USGS>''H2112256 YADKIN I2IVER;sA1 'ELlCHr NG
.Jan Jul J.an. ;Jul..
J,,l !
'299$
P0, ly naxinuM dischargo. —Estimated 'daily n'ean •discharge:
—;Daily nininuM i�lscharg�� Pterlod�af`appPoveddata;
;Uaa1y .Wean `discharge° Period of prouYsional datar
While flows were lower in summer 2008, I'm not sure that hasn't already been off set by the higher flows
at the end of the graph above. --
Trish Finn MacPherson
NCDWQ
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1621
919-743-8467 FAX [phone]
1 of 2 10/22/2008 9:25 AM

Michael F. Easley
Governor
North Carolina William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Department of Environment and Natural Resources
October 16, 2008
To: Trish MacPherson, Supervisor
Biological Assessment Unit
Environmental Sciences Section
From: Sergei Chernikov, Ph.D.
Environmental Engineer II
NPDES-West
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
Re: Louisiana Pacific Corporation NC0005266
Comments from NC Wildlife Resources Commission on the Draft NPDES Permit
The NPDES-West has reviewed comments from NC Wildlife Resources Commission on the Draft
NPDES Permit for the Louisiana Pacific Corporation, please see attached. One of the comments
(please see comment #2, on page #2) recommends conduc
Please let me know if you think that such study is warranter The ecial macroinvertebambient monitoringtdata does not
indicate any negative impact on the receiving stream from this facility and the IWC is only 1.3%.
cc: Permit File
N. C. Division of Water Quality / NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us
Phone: [phone]
fax: [phone]
DENR Customer Service Center: 1800 623-7748

about:blank
Ron,
We have received your comments and would like to provide response. Please see our
answers below:
1) The facility does not use chlorine for disinfection.
2) We will froward your recommendation to conduct a special macroi nverte b rate study in the
Yadkin River to our biologists.
3) DWQ is in the process of gathering nutrient data for the discharges in this area of the
Yadkin River Basin. Via correspondence dated 5/23/08 LP is required to conduct additional
effluent monitoring for NH3, TKN, NO2/NO3, TN and turbidity for the High Rock Lake TMDL
study.
LP is also participating in the Yadkin -Pee Dee River Basin Association. The Association
sampling points are on the Yadkin River at Business Hwy. 421 (upstream of the
discharge) and on the Yadkin River at Clingman Road near Ronda (downstream of the
discharge). Review of the coalition data did not indicate obvious impacts.
4) The Permit limits are based on the very conservative assumption of the 7Q10 flow in the
receiving stream. At this time we have no official information from USGS that the current
drought caused cahnges in the previous 7Q10 estimates.
In addition, the Instream Waste Concentration for this facility is only 1.3%. Due to the
high dilution, impacts from the facility are likely insignificant and very difficult to
quantify.
5)\ Every new or expanding discharge is already required to conduct Engineering
Alternative Analysis that includes evaluation of non -discharge option.
6) The issue of EDCs is very complex and should be addresses on a state-wide level.
Studies indicate that these chemicals are also present in municipal WWTPs. NCDENR
have provided grants to study these compounds in the effluent of the municipal WWTPs
in several areas of the state. However, DWQ has no funding to include EDCs in the
ambient monitoring program.
Please let me know if you have any additional questions.
Sergei
Sergei Chernikov, Ph.D.
Environmental Engineer II
NPDES-West
Phone: [phone], fax [phone]
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Express mail: 512 North Salisbury St.
Raleigh, NC 27606
1 of 1 10/15/2008 2:02 PM

Michael F. Easley
Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
October 16, 2008
To: Trish MacPherson, Supervisor
Biological Assessment Unit
Environmental Sciences Section
From: Sergei Chernikov, Ph.D.
Coleen H. Sullins, Director
Division of Water Quality
Environmental Engineer II
NPDES-West
Re: Louisiana Pacific Corporation NC0005266
Comments from NC Wildlife Resources Commission on the Draft NPDES Permit
The NPDES-West has reviewed comments from NC Wildlife Resources Commission on the Draft
NPDES Permit for the Louisiana Pacific Corporation, please see attached. One of the comments
(please see comment #2, on page #2) recommends conducting a special macroinvertebrate study.
Please let me know if you think that such study is warranted. The ambient monitoring data does not
indicate any negative impact on the receiving stream from this facility and the IWC is only 1.3%.
cc: Permit File
N. C. Division of Water Quality / NPDES Unit Phone: [phone]
1617 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 fax: [phone]
Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us DENR Customer Service Center:1800 623-7748

® North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
MEMORANDUM RECEIVED
TO: Bob Sledge, NPDES Program
Division of Water Quality
FROM: Ron Linville, Regional Coordinator S E P - 4 TM
Habitat Conservation Program
DATE: August 29, 2008 DENR - WATER OUALfTY
POINT SOURCE BRA094
SUBJECT: National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit 266
Renewal for Louisiana Pacific Corporation — Roaring River Plant, Roaring
River/Yadkin River Basin, Wilkes County
Biologists with the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission (NCWRC) have reviewed
the Public Notice concerning re -issuance of the referenced NPDES permit. Our comments are
provided in accordance with provisions of the Clean Water Act of 1977 (as amended), Fish and
Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. 401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661-667d), North Carolina
General Statutes (G.S. 113-131 et seq.), and North Carolina Administrative Code 15A NCAC
I01.0102.
Louisiana Pacific Corporation has applied for a renewal of its NPDES permit to discharge 2.0
Million Gallons per Day (MGD) of treated wastewater into the Yadkin River near the confluence
of the Roaring River. The Public Notice indicates that Boron is water quality limited. It is our
understanding that fiber board is manufactured at this facility and that during this process logs
are chipped and digested in a cooking process. Wood fibers are mixed with water and
preservatives and other chemicals prior to heating and pressurization to form construction board.
This process produces heat, tannins and lignons that are likely to be high in soluble BOD as well
as produce colored process waters and storage area stormwater issues. It is our understanding
that the facility has federal NPDES limits that may not satisfactorily address low flow conditions
and wastewater assimilation.
On the upper end of the Yadkin River directly below the W. Kerr Scott dam, NC WRC biologists
found no mussels. The state endangered brook floater (Alasmidonta varicosa) was found from
the Roaring River to below the Pilot Mountain Island Shoals. At the Mitchell River and below,
biologists found the state threatened creeper (Strophitus undulatus). Both of these are priority
Mailing Address: Division of Inland Fisheries • 1721 Mail Service Center •Raleigh, NC 27699-1721
Telephone: [phone] • Fix: [phone]

Louisiana Pacific NPDES Renewal Page 2 August 29, 2008
species for the North Carolina Wildlife Action Plan. Although not overly abundant, Elliptios in
the Yadkin River are threatened by decreased river flows as they prefer to live along the
riverbanks. Diminished flows plus Dissolved Oxygen (DO) reductions or prolonged periods of
low oxygen can affect mussel breathing, feeding, reproduction and. survival.
Based on the limited data that has been collected from the Yadkin. River by NCWRC biologists,
no major differences in the fish community upstream and downstream of the Louisiana-Pacific
discharge are apparent.. However, this data was collected during normal river flows and the
effects of the Louisiana-Pacific discharge may have been less pronounced. NCWRC surveys
indicate that mussel diversity and abundance in the Yadkin. and Roaring Rivers are very low.
Although the reasons for this low abundance are not entirely clear at this time, it is possible that
effluent from the Louisiana-Pacific facility may affect riverine .ecosystems and mussel
populations. If so, more stringent permit limits and wastewater treatment measures are
appropriate. Accordingly, BODs, ammonia, temperature, chlorine and other pollutant parameters
and permit limits should be thoroughly evaluated and modified as needed to protect and improve
aquatic habitats. Permit limits should be based on lower flows and less assimilative capacity
due to ongoing and anticipated future drought conditions as well as flow manipulations
associated with releases from W. Ken Scott Reservoir.
During recent drought conditions, state biologists have noted substantial DO sags that appear to
be associated with this NPDES permit. This sag is persistent in that diminished DO is observed
for many river miles. The DO sag appears to return to normal near Rockford. As indicated
above, aquatic species may be subject to declines and negative influences if the NPDES permit
limits are too high and assimilative capacities are inadequate. Accordingly, we recommend the
following conditions for the NPDES permit renewal to help with diminished water quality and to
reduce impacts to wildlife resources, in particular, listed aquatic species and their habitats.
1. If the WWTP uses chlorine disinfection and/or de -chlorination chemicals, the
disinfection system should be replaced with an ultraviolet or ozone system. Chlorine is
acutely toxic to aquatic organisms and can form secondary compounds that are
detrimental to. aquatic life. Valenti (2006) concluded the impact of long term exposure to
low doses of chlorine may impact juvenile mussels and reduce the chance of them being
recruited to the reproducing population. In addition, ammonia and copper should be
limited. Freshwater mussels are among. the most sensitive aquatic organisms tested for
impacts from ammonia. We have routinely recommend an acute water. quality standard
of 1.75 mg/1 total ammonia as N and chronic standard of 0.50 mg/1(at pH 8) as well as an
acute water quality standard of 3.6 ug/1 copper and chronic standard of 2.2 ug/1 to protect
mussel species (Augspurger et. Al. 2003, see also Technical Support Document).
2. The NC Division of Water Quality should conduct a special study of macroinvertebrates
in the Yadkin River to determine any possible biological impacts from this discharge.
Specifically, we would like to see data collected from sites upstream of the discharge
(Bridge Road & Business 421, Wilkesboro) and downstream of the discharge (Factory
Road, Ronda; Business 21, Elkin; and Highway 601). Other sites may be appropriate
study alternatives. This study should be accomplished during or immediately after the
current drought.

Louisiana Pacific NPDES Renewal Page 3
August 29, 2008
3. Due to diminished water depth, river flow, and algal growth in the Yadkin associated
with droughts, additional nutrient targets may be appropriate for NPDES permits in the
Roaring River and the upper Yadkin to avoid excessive nutrient loading, nuisance. algal
blooms, and DO depletion or reduction.
4. NPDES permit limits should reflect a reduction of dilution during low flow and drought
conditions, especially for smaller streams and shallowed rivers. It is our understanding
that headwater stream recharge has been significantly reduced by prolonged droughts.
5. An evaluation of non -discharge alternatives should be required for this and other NPDES
discharges in the Roaring River and upper Yadkin River (below W. Kerr Scott
Reservoir). This evaluation should include land application and connection to a
municipal sewer.
6., Recent studies have shown that endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDC) in treated
wastewater can inhibit reproduction of aquatic species. Mussels and their host species
could be affected directly or indirectly. We recommend studies be conducted to
document the levels of EDCs in this wastewater discharge through NPDES permit and
N.C. Division of Water Quality ambient studies. Should either monitoring or studies
document the presence of 1✓DCs at levels that can affect aquatic species, treatment train
measures should be implemented without delay to reduce or eliminate EDCs from
wastewater prior to discharge. Dr. W. Gregory Cope with the Department of
Environmental and Molecular Toxicology at N.C. State University has been studying the
effects of these compounds in wastewater discharges on aquatic species and may be
contacted to discuss past studies and study designs. Dr. Cope can be reached at (919)
515-5296.
Please consider these permit condition requests for inclusion in NPDES Permit NC0005266 and
for the provision of needed biological information about the upper Yadkin River. If you have
any questions about sampling locations or fisheries, please contact Mr. Kin Hodges, District 7
Fishery Biologist at 336-789-3266. If you have any questions about mussels and necessary
NPDES limits that protect mussels, please contact Dr. Ryan Heise, Wildlife Diversity Section at
919-528-9886.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this permit renewal. If I can be of further
assistance, please contact me at 336-769-9453.
Literature cited:
Valenti, T.W., D.S. Cherry, R.J. Currie, R.J. Neves, J.W. Jones, R. Mair, and C.M. Kane. 2006.
Chlorine toxicity to early life stages of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae).
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 25(9):2512-2518.
Augspurger, T., A.E. Keller, M.C. Black, W.G. Cope and F.J. Dwyer. 2003.. Water quality
guidance for protection of freshwater mussels (Unionidae) from ammonia exposure.
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 22: 2569-2575.

Louisiana Pacific NPDES Renewal
Page 4
August 29, 2008
Technical Support Document
Aquatic Species in
Watershed.
for Consideration of Federally -listed Threatened or Endangered
Water Quality Management Planning for the Goose Creek
c%20WO%20PIan.pdf
E-copy: Charles Weaver, NCDWQ NPDES Unit
Becky Fox, USEPA-ARO
George Smith, Steve Tedder, DWQ-WSRO
Kin Hodges, Ryan Heise, NCWRC

draft permit review-NC0005266 - LP -Roaring River WWTP
Subject: draft permit review-NC0005266 - LP -Roaring River WWTP
From: [e-mail]
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 07:54:59 -0400
To: [e-mail]
CC: [e-mail]
2 have no comments.
Karrie-Jo Robinson -Shell, P.E.
1 of 1 9/8/2008 10:04 AM

DENR/DWQ
FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT DEVELOPMENT
NPDES No. NC0005266, Louisiana-Pacific Corporation
Roaring River Plant
Facility Information
Applicant Facility Name:
Louisiana-Pacific Corporation Roaring
River Plant
Applicant Address:
P.O. Box 98 Roaring River NC 28669
Facility Address:
Off of H . 268 West of Roaring River
Permitted Flow
1.5 MGD (current)
2.0 MGD (requested expansion of flow)
Type of Waste:
97% Industrial, 3% Domestic
Facility/ Permit Status:
Renewal
County:
Wilkes
Miscellaneous
Receiving Stream:
Yadkin River
Regional Office:
WSRO
Stream Classification:
C
Quad
C14NE, Roaring River
303 d Listed?:
No
Permit Writer:
Ser ei Chernikov
Subbasin:
030701(Yadkin)
Date:
August 1 2008
Drainage Area mil :
610
MOW
Summer 7Q 10 cfs
228
30Q2 (cfs):
Average Flow cfs :
976
IWC (%):
1.3%
Primary SIC Code:
2493
SUMMARY
Louisiana Pacific Corporation (LP) — Roaring River site manufactures smooth one-sided
hardboard. The facility purchases chips (softwood/hardwood) or chips scrap wood on -site, the
chips are washed/screened, the chips are digested/pulped, the pulp slurry is then molded,
then the resulting product is treated (via temperature/pressure) to make smooth one-sided
hardboard. This plant used to manufacture both smooth one-sided hardboard and fiber
cement board (the processing plants are located adjacent to each other). After LP acquired the
plant, it sold the fiber cement board manufacturing portion. However, the fiber cement
manufacturer (now held by Certainteed) discharges its contact cooling water to LP's intake
impoundment.
Recently, LP applied for a major modification due to the need to accommodate a new wet
scrubber blowdown stream. LP requested an increase in flow from 1.5 MGD to 2.0 MGD. The
facility was not requesting any increase in loading or limits (limits will remain the same, with
the exception of toxicity testing percentage and flow). Various water conservation efforts have
been made at the plant over the years, but current conditions require installation of the wet
scrubber to comply with National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants. The mill
will comply with the Maximum Achievable Control Technology Requirements (MACT) by
removing hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) in a new scrubber at the mm's digesters. The use of
this scrubber can create and additional 0.5 MGD of wastewater flow that contain HAPs,
primarily methanol. The HAPs contained in this flow will be effectively removed by
biodegradation in the aeration basin at the mill's wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). The
scrubber blowdown stream will be conveyed directly to the aeration basin in a "hard pipe"
configuration that does not allow loss of HAPs to the atmosphere. The hard pipe will discharge
the new wastewater source below the surface of the aeration basin for immediate mixing and
contact with the biomass in the treatment process. The organic content of the constituents
removed in the scrubber effluent will increase the current BOD loading to the WWTP by only
3%. No changes to the WWTP will be necessary to accommodate this new wastestream.
LP Corporation Roaring River NC0005266
NPDES Renewal
Page 1

The current treatment system consists of a lift station for process flow (approximately 0.9028
MGD, 97% of the total flow), flow meter, spill diversion/2 spill ponds, primary clarifier, influent
mixing box, aerated lagoon, secondary clarifier, backup lagoon, effluent mixing box, effluent
flow meter/sampling, DAF for residuals handling, residuals dewatering presses (land disposal
of residuals). A sanitary package plant handles approximately 0.03 MGD of flow (3% of total
flow). Effluent from the sanitary plant is routed to the.aerated lagoon. The existing primary
clarifier has been converted to equalization "and a primary DAF unit -was added. The sanitary
effluent flow has been diverted to the effluent mixing box (taken out of the aerated lagoon).
Both. sanitary and process wastewater streams will be mixed prior to effluent sampling and. flow
measurement.
TOXICITY TESTING:
Current Requirement: Chronic P/F at 1.3%, January, April, July, October.
"Proposed Requirement: Chronic P/F at 1.3%, January, April, July, October.
The facility has been consistently meeting the permit WET limit with one exception. WET
failure occurred in January 2007, subsequent tests passed (see attached).
COMPLIANCE SUMMARY: BASED ON THE PREVIOUS 4 YEARS
There are no outstanding and/or chronic compliance problems related to the NPDES permit.
The Compliance Evaluation Inspection conducted on 03/24/2008 was satisfactory with some
areas rated as excellent.
INSTREAM MONITORING:
LP is not, required to perform instream monitoring due. to its participation in the Yadkin Pee
Dee River Basin Association.- 'The Association sampling points are on the Yadkin River at
Business Hwy. 421 (upstream of the discharge) and on the Yadkin River at-Clingman Road near
Ronda (downstream of the discharge).. Review of the coalition data did not indicate obvious
impacts. It is difficult to assess the effect of the discharge on the Yadkin River, especially due to
the high dilution.
Via correspondence dated 5/23/08 LP is required to conduct additional eMuent.monitoring for
NH3, TKN, NO2/NO3, TN and turbidity for the;High Rock Lake TMDL study.
PROPOSED CHANGES:
Based on the results of the RPA (please see attached), the limit for Boron has been added and .
monitoring has been increased to weekly.
PROPOSED SCHEDULE FOR PERMIT ISSUANCE:
Draft Permit to Public Notice: August 13, 2008 (est.)
Permit Scheduled'to Issue: October 6, 2008 (est.)
STATE CONTACT:
If you have any questions on any of the above information or on the attached permit, please
contact Sergei Chernikov at [phone] ext. ' 594:
REGIONAL OFFICE COMMENT:
NAME: DATE:
LP Corporation Roaring River NC0005266
NPDES Renewal
Page 2

NOTES FOR APPLICATION OF GUIDELINES:
40 CFR 429 TIMBER PRODUCTS PROCESSING POINT SOURCE CATEGORY
ISUBPART E WET PROCESS HARDBOARD SUBCATEGORY, 429.611
This facility falls under Subpart E -Wet Process Hardboard Subcategory, Smooth One -Sided (SI S)
The parameters. and calculated limits presented here are for comparison purposes only. The current
limits are more restrictive than the guidelines project. The existing limits were based on a negotiated
settlement in 1995. The facility had a history of high effluent solids, which contributed to degradation of
the downstream habitat of the Yadkin River. Significant improvements were made at the plant and this
-portion of the Yadkin River.is now benthically rated as Good/Fair.
Parameter
Daily max,
m /l
Monthly avg.,
m /l .
BOD5
20.5
10.7
TSS
37.3
24.6
PH
6-9 SU
Average production:
1579.57 lbs/ 10001bs gross product
Parameter
. Daily max,
Lbs/da
Monthly avg.,
Lbs/da
BOD5
32,381
15,796
TSS
58,918
38,857
PH
6-9 SU
LP Corporation Roaring River NC0005266
NPDES Renewal
Page 3

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
LP Corporation -Roaring Gap
NC0005266
Time Period 0
Qw (MGD) 2 WWTP Class N
7Q10S (cfs) 228 IWC (%) @ 7Q10S 1-.3414
7Q10W (cfs) 310 @ 7Q10W 0.9901
t, 30Q2 (cfs) Q . @ 30Q2 N/A
Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cfs) 976 @ QA 0.3166
Reeving Stream Yadkin River Stream Class C
Outfall 001
Qw=2MGD
STANDARDS &
PARAMETER
TYPE
CRITERIA (2) '.
PQL
Units
REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS
RECOMMENDED ACTION
NCWQS1 %FAV/
a #Dot MaxPredCw AllowableCw
It)
Chronic Acute
Acute: N/A
in Y r Frrr
r� 5 Y-g r at karu 43a n.
Boron
C
750
ug/L
12 12
1039997.0
_ _
Chronic_ 236,879
50 AL 67
6 6 1.122.0
Acute:
Zinc
-NC
ug/L
Note: n412
Chronic 3,727
Nrs' tUljjx w. 1: s
• Legend: I r •' Freshwater Discharge
C = Carcinogenic
NC = Non -carcinogenic
A =Aesthetic
5266-rpa-2008; rpa
7/31/2008

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Boron
Date
Data
BDL=1/2DL
Results
1
130.0
130.0
Std Dev.
20509.8795
2
170.0
170.0
Mean
7657.5833
3
160.0
160.0
C.V.
2,6784
4
190.0
190.0
n
12
5
210.0
210.0
6
180.0
180.0
Mult Factor
14.7100
7
70700.0
70700.0
Max. Value
70700.0 ug/L
8
18200.0
18200.0
Max. Pred C
1039997.0 ug/L
9
513.0
513.0
10
458.0
458.0
11
526.0
526.0
12
454.0
454.0
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44 "
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
199
200
5266-rpa-2008, data
1 - 7/31/2008

REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Zinc
Date
Data
BDL=112DL
Results
1
300
300.0
Std Dev.
89.8593
2
100
- 100.0
Mean
152.5000
3
70
70.0
C.V.
0.5892
4
71
71.0
n
6
5
183
183.0
6
191
191.0
Mult Factor =
3.7400
7
Max. Value
300.0 ug/L
8
Max. Pred Cw
1122.0 ug4-
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
199
200
5266-rpa-2008, data
- 2 - 7/31/2008

Winston-Salem Journal
Advertising Affidavit
Winston-Salem Journal
P.O Box 3159
Winston-Salem, NC 27102
NCDENR/DWO/POINT SOURCE BRANCH
ATTN: DINA SPRINKLE
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NC 27699-1617
Account Number
3376309
Date
August 16, 2008
Date Category Description Ad Size Total Cost
08/16/2008 Legal Notices PUBLIC NOTICE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA E 2 x 71 L 537.69
PUBLIC NOTICE
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
COMMISSION, NPDES UNIT
1617 MAIL SERVICE CENTER
RALEIGH, NC 27699-1617
NOTIFICATION OF INTENT TO ISSUE
A NPDES WASTEWATER PERMIT
On the basis of thorough staff review and appli-
cation of NC General Statute 143.215.1 and 15A
NCAC O;H.0109 and other lawful standards and reg-
ulations, the North Carolina Environmental Man.
agement Commission proposes to issue a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
wastewater discharge permit to the person(s). list-
ed below effective 45 days from the publish date of
this notice.
Written comments reggarding the proposed permit
will be accepted until 30 days after the publish date
of this notice. All comments received prior to that
date are considered in the final determinations re -
yarding the proposed permit The Director of the
NC Division of Water Quality may decide to hold
a public meeting for the proposed permit, should
the Division receive a significant degree of public
Interest
the draft permit and ,
on file used to de
the draft permit are
yumny at v4 N. 5ausoury Street, Raleigh, NC
27604-1148 between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5:00
p.m. to review information on file.
Media General Operations, Inc.
Publisher of the
Winston-Salem Journal
Forsyth County
Before the undersigned, a Notary Public of Forsyth County, North Carolina, duly
commissioned, qualified, and authorized by law to administer oaths, personally appeared
D.H. Stanfield, who by being duly sworn deposes and says: that he is Controller of the
Winston-Salem Journal, engaged in the publishing of a newspaper (mown as Winston-Salem
Journal, published, issued and entered as second class mail in the City of Winston-Salem, in
said County and State: that he is authorized to make this affidavit and sworn statement: that
the notice or other legal advertisement, a true copy of which is attached hereto, was
published in the Winston-Salem Journal on the following dates:
08/16/2008
and that the said newspaper in which such notice, paper document, or legal advertisement
was published was, at the time of each and every such publication, a newspaper meeting all
the requirements and qualifications of Section 1-597 of the General Statutes of North
Carolina and was a qualified newspaper within the meaning of Section 1-597 of the General
Statutes of North Carolina.
This 16th day of August, 2008
Loublarta Pacti conscription - Roaring River Plant
P.O. Box 9R, Roaring River North Carolina 28669,
has aooIled for a renewal of its NPDES permit
(NC0005266). The permit allows the facility to dis.
charge 2.0 MGD treated sanitary and industrial
wastewater to the Yadkin River in the Yadkin Pee -
Dee River Basin. Currently, Boron is water quality
limited. This discharge ma affect future discharg- Sworn to and subscribed before me, this 16th day of
es in this portion of t e Yadkin River Basin.
The Yadkin County Board of Education [121 Wash.
ington St.. Yadkinville, NC 270551 has applied for re -
of permit NCO070459 for the Starmount High
School WWTP. This permitted facility discharg-es
treated domestic wastewater into an unnamed trib-
utary to South Deep Creek in the Yadkin -Pee Dee
River Basin. Currently, ammonia nitrogen fecal
coliform, dissolved oxygen and total residual chlor-
ine are water quality -limited. This discharge may
affect future allocations in this portion of the
receiv-ing stream.
11151: August 16, 2006
My Commission expires • 2.4 10
1
(signature ojper on 7 ak' 1g affidavit)
THIS IS NOT A BILL. PLEASE PAY FROM INVOICE. THANK YOU

March 17, 2008
Sergei Chernikov
NC DENR, Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
Subject: NPDES Permit Renewal Application
Louisiana-Pacific Corporation - Roaring River Facility
Permit No. NC0005266
Dear Sergei,
LP
_
BUILDING PRODUCTS
MAR 1
Enclosed with this letter are three copies of a permit renewal application package for the
Louisiana-Pacific Roaring River hardboard mill wastewater treatment system, permit number
NC005266. The application package contains the completed application forms as well as a
narrative description of our sludge management plan. The current permit will expire on
September 30, 2008.
Louisiana Pacific employed RMT, Inc., located in Greenville, SC, to assist with the completion
of the application forms. Certification signature authority was not transferred to RMT but
was retained by Louisiana Pacific.
Please contact meat [phone] or via email at billy.thompsonalpcorp.com you have any
questions.
Sincerely,
�. f /'W.
Billy M. Thompson, Jr.
Plant Environmental Manager
Attachments: Permit Application (3)
Narrative description of Sludge Management Plan (3)
Copy: George Smith — NC DENR, Winston-Salem
ADDRESS P.O. BOX 98
Roaring River, NC 28669
TEL [phone]
PAR 336.696.3443
WEB www.Ipcorp.wm

Sludge Management Practices
Louisiana-Pacific Corporation
Roaring River, North Carolina
Louisiana-Pacific Corporation (LP) [formerly known as ABTCo, and LP Company] located in
Roaring River, NC (Wilkes County) generates sludges from two different sources that are
segregated and managed separately.
Primary and Secondary Sludge Management
The major source of sludge from the mill is generated by belt filter presses that dewater a
combination of primary solids removed from the process wastewater at the head -end of the
wastewater treatment plant mixed with waste activated sludge removed from the secondary
treatment process.
LP currently operates a residuals land application program in compliance with the requirements of
NCDENR-DWQ Permit No. WQ0000461. LP has submitted a detailed Residuals Management Plan
to the agency associated with that permit. The land application program beneficially recycles
wastewater residuals resulting from the biological treatment and subsequent mechanical
dewatering of process wastewater solids derived from process water used in the manufacture of
hardboard siding. The residuals are land applied on LP -owned sites as well as privately -owned
local receiver sites planted to row and forage crops. The program is currently operated under the
NCDENR regulations based on 40 CFR 257 and count many of the area's leading growers and
landowners as program participants.
Dewatered residuals are conveyed directly into a spreader truck(s) for distribution/land
application on area receiver sites. During periods of inclement weather or crop rotational patterns
the residuals will be temporarily staged/stored on -site at the LP facility. The staging facility is
comprised of two concrete -lined basins with a total capacity of 2,000 dry tons, or approximately 33
days of production capacity. Once weather or cropping patterns allow for recommencement of
distribution, the residuals will be loaded into a spreader truck via front-end loaders for
transportation and land application.
Zinc Sludge Management
The second source of sludge at the mill is generated from a physical/chemical treatment of the
process wastewaters following the primary treatment system, but prior to biological degradation in
the secondary treatment system. The physical/chemical process precipitates zinc from the waste
stream and also removes residual levels of fine wood solids from the wastewater stream before
entering the aeration basin. The zinc -containing sludge is dewatered with belt filter presses
dedicated to this application.
In a November 15, 2007, letter NCDENR approved the addition of the zinc sludge to the list of
wastes that may be placed in the mill's on -site Wood Products Landfill (Permit No. 97-03). The
Landfill Operations Plan associated with that permit describes the management of zinc sludge in
the Wood Products Landfill. LP also retains the option to dispose of this sludge in commercial
landfills as a non -hazardous waste.
3 13 og,
$i tre Date

.,\CAD\00-6998\ OI\SLG-00.6998.OI-OOI.DGN
•AHS 5/18/200T
L-.
IVSJ
65
�� ✓ �\ ' '. � _ � � n �i /ice '��'
lJ r S O 3b l'1 bLl J� 'I)at
Si 1.936
1
MAP DERIVED FROM DELORME'S
ROARING RIVER (NC)1966
0
3000 fiQQQ
7.5' USGS TOPOGRAPHIC OUADRANGLE
APPROXIMATE IMIE RADIUS
SHOWN AROUND FACILITY
SCALE: 1''=3000'
DRAWN BY AHS
LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORPORATION
APPROVED BY:
ROARING RIVER, NORTH CAROLINA
PROJECT N0. oonxs..
FILE NO
®
SITE LOCATION MAP
DATE: MAY 200T
FIGURE 1

Narr— E17�-00.71345.44-001.DWG Operator Name: H.W.C. Scale: 1"=1' Attached Xrefs: LAYOUT
0.65 MGD
EVAPORATIVE/PROCESS
LOSSES
MACT SCRUBBER
0.05 MGD
MILL
1.492 MGD
PROCESS
�- — — WASTEWATER
CERTAIN TEED 8,000 gpd
SAN ITARY PRIMARY
WASTES SANITARY TREATMENT
WWTP
P
ZINC
TREATMENT
CERTAI NTEED OUTFALL
STORAGE 002
0.1 MGD POND
RIVER INTAKE
2.5 MGD
YADKIN
RIVER
SECONDARY
WWTP
0.5 MGD
BLOWDOWN
DISCHARGE
2.0 MGD PLANT WATER BALANCE SCHEMATIC
OUTFACE 001 LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORP.
ROARING RIVER, NC.
DWN. BY: H. CURINGTON
_ APPROVED BY. B.J.T.
DATE:. 1 22 08
' ' = PROS. # 00-71345.44
FILE #FOG-00.71345.44-001.DWG

Form 2C Attachment
Item II B
Note #1 The process wastewater is a combination of water from the manufacture, fabrication and
finishing of hardboard siding, wet scrubbing, and steam plant discharge (condensate,
boiler scrubber discharge, boiler blowdown).
Note #2 Sanitary package plant codes: 1-T, 3-A, 4-A
Process wastewater treatment system codes: 1-G, 1-H, 1-L, 1-0, 1-U, 2-C, 2-D, 3-A, 4-A,
5-C, 5-E, and 5-P
Note #3 The wastewater treatment system consists of a bar screen and/or in -line grinder, influent
pump station, equalization tank, primary solids dissolved air flotation unit, pumps, sludge
holding/mixing tank, sludge thickener, two "S" roller belt filter presses, solids conveyor,
metals precipitation and removal in a dissolved air floating unit, one activated sludge
aeration basin, nutrient system, secondary clarifier, a secondary solids dissolved air
flotation unit, and two emergency primary settling basins.
Note: Currently, Louisiana Pacific has the capability to receive approximately 0.1 mgd of
treated process wastewater from CertainTeed Corporation into LP's on -site freshwater
makeup pond which combines with approximately 2.0 mgd of raw river water for use as
process water by LP.
Item VIII D
Note #4 List of pollutants analyzed by Environment 1, Inc.
POLLUTANT
Total Organic Carbon (TOC)
Ammonia (as N)
Color
Fecal Coliform
Fluoride 16984 18-8
Nitrate-Nitrite (as N)
Nitrogen, Total Organic (as N)
Oil and Grease
Beta, Total
Sulfate (as SO,) (14808-79-8)
Surfactants (MBAS)
Aluminum, Total (7429-90-5)
Barium, Total 7440-39-3
Boron, Total (7440-42-8)
Cobalt, Total (7440-48-4)
Iron, Total (7439-896)
Magnesium, Total (7439-954)
Man anew, Total (7439-%-5)
Form 2C Attachment, I
Louisiana-Pacific Corporation I:\WPGV \PIT\00-nt\M\FOUJ130.51400%2CATrACHMENT.DOC

t
1M. Antimony, Total (7440-36-0)
2M. Arsenic, Total (7440-38-2)
3M. Beryllium, Total (7440-41-7)
4M. Cadmium, Total (7440-43-9)
5M. Chromium, Total (7440-47-3)
6M. Copper, Total (7440-50-8)
7M. Lead, Total (7439-92-1)
8M. Mercury, Total (7439-97-6)
9M. Nickel, Total (7440-02-0)
10M. Selenium, Total (7782-49-2)
11M. Silver, Total (7440-22-4)
12M. Thallium, Total (7440-28-0)
13M. Zinc, Total (7440-66-6)
14M. Cyanide, Total (57-12-5)
2,3,7,8-Tetra-chlorodibenzo-P-Dioxin (1764-01-6)
FVOLATI44COMPOUN0090M
1V. Acrolein (107-02-8)
2V. Ac lonitrile (107-13-1)
3V. Benzene (71-43-2)
4V. Bis (Chloro-meth 1) Ether (542-88-1)
5V. Bromoform (75-25-2)
6V. Carbon Tetrachloride (56-23-5)
7V. Chlorobenzene (108-90-7)
8V. Chlorodi-bromomethane (124-48-1)
9V. Chloroethane (75-00-3)
10V. 2-Chloro-eth loin 1 Ether (110-75-8)
11V. Chloroform (67-66-3)
12V. Dichloro-bromomethane (75-27-4)
13V. Dichloro-difluoromethane (75-71-8)
14V.1,1-Dichloro-ethane (75-34-3)
15V.1,2-Dichloro-ethane (107-06-2)
16V.1,1-Dichloro- ethylene (75-35-4)
17V,1,2-Dichloro- ro ane (78-87-5)
18V. 1,3-Dichloro- ro lene (542-75-6)
19V. Ethlbenzene (100-414)
20V. Methyl Bromide (74-83-9)
21V. Methyl Chloride (74-87-3)
22V. Methylene Chloride (75-09-2)
23V.1,1,2,2-Tetra-chloroethane (79-34-5)
24V. Tetrachloro-ethylene (127-18-4)
25V. Toluene (108-88-3)
26V.1,2-Trans-Dichloroethlene (156-60-5)
27V.1,1,1-Tri-chloroethane (71-55-6)
28V.1,1,2-Tri-chloroethane (79-00-5)
29V. Trichloro-ethylene (79-01-6)
30V. Trichloro-fluoromethane (75-69-4)
31V. Vinyl Chloride (75-01-4)
Form 2C Attachment, 2
Louisiana-Pacific Corporation
I: \ WPGVL\PJT\00-71345 \44 \F007134544-003_2C ATTACHMENT.DOC

GC/1VISFRACTIONx sACIMMMPOUNDS
1A. 2-Chloro henol (95-57-8)
2A. 2,4-Dichloro- henol (120-83-2)
3A. 2,4-Dimeth1- henol (105-67-9)
4A. 4-6-Dinitro-O-Cresol (534-52-1)
5A. 2,4-Dinitro- henol (51-28-5)
6A. 2-Nitrophenol (88-75-5)
7A. 4-Nitr6henol (100-02-7)
8A. P-Chloro-M-Cresol (59-50-7)
9A. Pentachloro- henol (87-86-5)
10A. Phenol (108-95-2)
11A. 2,4,6-Tri-chloro henol (88-06-2)
., GC/MS FRACTION BASE/1VEIJTRAiCOMPOIJNDS,� ,c �� -�
1B. Acena hthene (83-32-9)
2B. Acena hthlene (208-96-8)
3B. Anthracene (120-12-7)
4B. Benzidine (92-87-5)
5B. Benzo (a) Anthracene (56-55-3)
6B. Benzo (a) P rene (50-32-8)
7B. 3,4-Benzo- fluoranthene (205-99-2)
8B. Benzo (hi) Pe lene (191-24-2)
9B. Benzo W Fluoranthene (207-08-9)
10B. Bis (2-chloro-ethox) Methane (111-91-1)
11B. Bis (2-chloro-ethyl) Ether (111-44-4)
12b. Bis (2-Chloroiso- ro 1) Ether (102-60-1)
13B. Bis (2-Ethyl-he 1) Phthalate (117-81-7)
14B. 4-Bromo- hen 1 Phenyl Ether (101-55-3)
15B Butyl Benz 1 Phthalate (85-68-7)
16B. 2-Chloro-naphthalene (91-58-7)
17B. 4-Chloro- hen 1 Phenyl Ether (7005-72-3)
18B. Chrysene (218-01-9)
19B. Dibenzo (a,h). Anthracene (53-70-3)
20B.1,2-Dichloro-benzene (95-50-1)
21B.1,3-Dichloro-benzene (541-73-1)
22B.1,4-Dichloro-benzene (106-46-7)
23B. 3,3'-Dichloro-benzidine (91-94-1)
24B. Diethyl Phthalate (84-66-2)
25B. Dimeth 1 Phthalate (131-11-3)
26B. Di-N-But 1 Phthalate (84-74-2)
27B. 2,4-Dinitro- toluene (121-14-2)
28B. 2,6-Dinitro-toluene (606-20-2)
29B. Di-N-Octyl Phthalate (117-84-0)
30B.1,2-Di hen 1-h drazine (as Azo-benzene) (122-66-7)
31B. Fluoranthene (206-44-0)
32B. Fluorene (86-73-7)
33B. Hexachlorobenzene(118-84-1)
34B. Hexa-chlorobutadiene(87-68-3)
35B. Hexachloro- clo entadiene (77-47-4)
36B. Hexachloro-ethane (67-72-1)
37B. Indeno (1,2,3-cd) P rene (193-39-5)
Form 2C Attachment, 3
Louisiana-Pacific Corporation
1:\WPGVL\PJT\00-71345\44\F007134544-003_2C ATTACHMENT.DOC

38B. Iso horone (78-59-1)
39B. Na thalene (91-20-3)
4OB. Nitrobenzene (98-95-3)
41B. N-Nitro-sodimeth lamine (62-75-9)
42B. N-Nitrosodi-N-Pro lamine (621-64-7)
43B. N-Nitro-sodi hen lamine (86-30-6)
44B. Phenanthrene (85-01-8)
45B. P rene (129-00-0)
46B.1,2,4-Tri-chlorobenzene (120-82-1)
GC/MSFRACTION PESTICIDES a,....?.s:
1P. Aldrin (309-00-2)
2P. a-BHC (319-84-6)
3P. R-BHC (319-85-7)
4P. y-BHC (58-89-9)
5P. 6-BHC (319-86-8)
6P. Chlordane (57-74-9)
7P. 4,4'-DDT (50-29-3)
8P. 4,4'-DDE (72-55-9)
9P. 4,4'-DDD (72-54-8)
1OP. Dieldrin (60-57-1)
11P. a-Endosulfan (115-29-7)
12P. O-Endosulfan (115-29-7)
13P. Endosulfan Sulfate (1031-07-8)
14P. Endrin (72-20-8)
15P. Endrin Aldehyde (7421-93-4)
16P. Heptachlor (76-44-8)
17P. Heptachlor Epoxide (1024-57-3)
18P. PCB-1242 (53469-21-9)
19P. PCB-1254 (11097-69-1)
2OP. PCB-1221 (11104-28-2)
21P-PCB-1232 (11141-16-5)
22P. PCB-1248 (12672-29-6)
23P. PCB-1260 (11096-82-5)
24P. PCB-1016 (12674-11-2)
25P. Toxa hene (8001-35-2)
Form 2C Attachment, 4
Louisiana-Pacific Corporation
I:\WPGVL\PJT\00-71345\44\F007134594003_2C ATrACHMENT.DOC