NC0020567_wasteload allocation_19810212

NPDES DOCUWENT SCANNINS COVER SHEET
NPDES Permit:
NC0020567
Elkin WWTP
Document Type:
Permit Issuance
Wasteload Allocat!qii.
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Speculative Limits
Correspondence
Re:
Instream Assessment (67B)
Environmental Assessment (EA)
Permit
History
Document Date:
February 12, 1981
This document is printed on reuse paper - iganore any
content on the reverse side

1naf * I h
NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
�/'; --AAi
Facility Name: �16n Li�U ) j Date:
Existing a Permit No.: Pipe No.
Proposed Ez
Design Capacity (MGD): U Industrial (% of Flow):
County: Sur( 4 _
Domestic (% of Flow): ICY�)cle
Y S� Sub -Basin: 6 `? -t�7
Receiving Stream: zd��n 12 � Class: - -
C 15 NE I_rrir P-r:[ E -
Reference USGS Quad: f115 S E (Please attach) Requestor: -Fr Regional Office _(US S 0
SSpC.
(Guideline limitations, if applicable, are to be listed on the back of this form.)
Design Temp.: ' C Drainage Area: C/ e" Avg. Streamflow: nn � � t _n-1'
7Q10: ,:3 , S c Winter 7Q10: 30Q2: 7 U O CTS
Location of
ID.O.minimum (miles below outfall): Slope:.
3, (c '/rn, 17
Velocity (fps): I, 5 Kl (base e, per day, �6)-_ a'tL2 K2 (base e, per day,..A9c):
ropo5�d QurChaS� ^ot ihsr�+LYri'
�ci�71'1RS il1L'.
��l �T.il
11T.: I �� Ilfa'lPi
I Effluent
Characteristics
Comments
� ►��ll
l
ZTY 6Jy1 fowr+ of tlkin ar%d
_t�n UJ�t1"f S .
Effluent Monthly
Characteristics I Average Comments
Orr/Aginal Allocation FX
j,J ised Allocation Date(s) of Revision(s)
11 (Please attach previous allocation)
� 1n_ (' o�
P epared By: r-nr%"i 1EBU2Uh IPt-1) Reviewed By: Am Date: I /��
4
d
41
� n2tlo�1

MEMO.
DATE:
TO: �'- ,y/�" !e &,e SUBJECT:
T 6 L // i / % Fae Ff Fz
14l F 5-0 `�c5 EERoEN7-
MW " 7/%lZ v� z-
z
47
fiff� J/L7�4s
51 /I -,�Z2
/4,'64, Q 6�z
North Carolina Department of Natural
Resources &Commun'ty Development

RMT
WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION APPROVAL FORM
Facility Name: Elkin WBTP
County: Surry Sub -basin:
Regional Office: NPRO Requestor:Ia rry Pierce -Moore Ga ek /lssoc
Type of Wastewater: Industrial %
Domestic Z
If industrial, specify type(s) of industry:
aaceiving stream: Yadkin R
Other stream(s) affected:
7Q10 flow at point of discharge:
30Q2 flow at point of discharge:
Natural stream drainage area at
/UU cis
rge point
Class
Recommended Effluent Limitations
Mcaithly Ave
BODS 30 mg/1
TSS 30 mg/l
pH 6-9 SU see s lfec%ed
—Tot. Cv. a C
Fecal Coliform 1000/100 ml
Flow 4.0 M(;D
This facility involves the purchase of the Chatham Mfg. WWfP
by the town of Elkin, and the discharge of the combined Elkin
$ Chatham Mfg. wastewaters from the Chatham Mfg. KWI'P site.
This allocation is: /Y
Recommended and
reviewed by
combination of two existing
for a proposed facility facilities.
for a new (existing) facility
a revision of existing limitations
a confirmation of existing limitations
Date: 2 Sp
Head, Techncial Services Branch ' Date:
Reviewed b �� �
//
y' st[C ? / a 1 ' Aiaty' %Cl�i��N'. //, y�,«1V
Regional Supervisor Date: / e-
Permits Manager C, Da to Z"9
Approved by:
Division Director Dater

!�. pr��os��l Akin - C'ha��arn �znu-�ac�ur�r►U
W WTI J
C15NG
13j5SuEzA {-ern) Rr=re a� �ttJdvrt - Caor�e)Ei,.
�SSaCr���S' it +ham IElki„- o
E114v�-i "Is Ai -rnktny off pu r churn.
CVIA,m r11 211u�ac�Jurvv-c6rA
�ou.)S
di SC 1
WWI P JJ C155chc( p6 nA.
w-T P / coal 6 ni n7
J
both l ai ll S, al c
�1Ha"I�z.r�n 111 ae�vi,
Fror-'Nat Is15 on yzjkiIl ► , \-/ - LY�ztllzm {iaJJY�VY V uIcsa
�(aksr1c`6*ero Ap�l;-no E go)A
IIr'�'r�S -�cX tiiS City — oWh{�� "�Z{'1lit� IrJOU'q
sEcot�dzf y ' `J JJ
BUD, = 110 mS/j
90US = 30 "'Z�i
N t�13 -N
TSS
aA-e i
:, = 11,9 m5�1 �by v�iasS
`
i, Sep-Ci1r�41rn"+ Matlut.
i

® aaa 16 o
14
CT
y WLUTP V
--qua
�4
e
s
d ��CT°

UpsAre.!-m aS R1
1 oa. iiaz.5-000 - 7cplo = 385c�s
R,jr+oW
385 cVB&y m6, 2
U.yy3 /mom2
zVIC- t R p
93, roi
Esi, r�nott = q3.a mi' o,g93 cfS/mc;
- 19. 1A /vr. 7 Mi
3. 3 (o C(V ..i
v� o.Ixrl (3E5�o�°9

4ST = 385 crs
DR. ' SO r*+i'
: 070,
`C
i0 C70 DO SA 1
= 7. 6 5 m�l
h?I
RD�
R3
RI
R5
L= G,2mi
CG.`I
I.1
.:?.(j
a.C)
\nl =
I.5 �s
I, 5
1,5
I, 5
1.5
Qw:
-4,C)
o,a
I,v
J3,�
o.l
o.o3.S
0.0 y/�
7.39 "A
o.o
o.o
S, C)b
ICI
= I to �y�
19 . O
1
3G
&1
3.&1Q/ma
3,(c4l
3,%`4
3,(04
3,6`I
1<I
O.9717 Ae�l
GA710
G,Y735
-1• 705-1 day
ti, 7oS7
-i, 7057
1,7oS7
9, 7057
Z.O.
7 3.3(0
3. 3 io
SS
5.0 "'��I
SO
5•C)

- j
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
January 13, 1981
MEMORANDUM
TO. A. C. Turnage //�
FROM: Forrest Westall
SUBJECT: Effluent Limitations for a Proposed Elkin WWTP
I have reviewed the attached memo (1/9/81) from Fin Johnson and have
discussed this situation with others in the Winston Salem Regional Office.
Basedon the low total chromium levels presently in the Chatham Mfg.
discharge and with adequate monitoring requirements in the permit
(if granted), the deletion of the total chromium limit is acceptable.
If you agree, then the approval form can be modified. I would recommend
that Fin Johnson's memo and my memo be attached to the form as backup for
this change. If you have any questions, please let me know.
I -r 69 n Cv r I'll
re,Gc m M P•i d e 41
e-.4 2R j es,

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES & COMMONIIT DZVZLOpn=
DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGVgW
Winston-Salem Regional Office
January 9, 1481
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: A. C. Turnage d Forrest Qestall
Permits d Engineering Technical Services ISranch
FROM: Fin Johnson
Regional Supervisor
SUBJECT: Waste Load Allocation for a combined
Town of Elkin and Chatham ::anufacturinr Company
treated waste discharge
Sorry County
Since the Town's Mi'."1' is desil;::ed for .11 11Cll (permitted at a 1. 1 itGD
level) and the Town is proposing, to pvrcliase the Chatham twlTp designed for
4.0 MGD (new permit drafted it a 2.9 :[CD level), it necessitated some thought
re&arding the limitations for i.nown inrlu;;trin; pollutant levels in the future
combined discharge.
There may he a problem with TSS proposed since the Chatham discharge
averages approximately 45 mg/l and the Elkin discharge averages approximately
27 mg/l. Oil and grease ling averaged 15 mg/l, total chromium has averaged
.08 mg/l, phenol has avernrred 14 ug/l, and sulfide .14 mg/1 in the Chatham
discharge during the period November, 1979 through October, 1980.
Since the levels of chromium, oil and greane, phenol, and sulfide have
been consistantly low, it nppears logical to merely require monitoring of each
in the effluent rather than to set limits at this point. The proposed 11.4
mg/l total chromium for the 4.0 MGD discharge should be deleted since it
doesn't reflect the established level of .08 mg/l (12 month average) by Chathemo
the Town's only known source of chromium bearing wnuee.
Therefore, we recommend deletion of the 11.4 ng/1 total chromium limit as
It would appear to encourage pollution and we agree with the other limits a'--0