Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0004812_permit issuance_20061213 (2)NPDES DOCYNENT SCANNWIi COVER SHEET NPDES Permit: NC0004812 Document Typl! Permit Issuance Wasteload Allocation Authorization to Construct (AtC) Permit Modification Compliance / Enforcement Permit History Date Range: Correspondence Document Date: December 13, 2006 THIS DOCUMENT K PRINTED ON REUSE PAPER - IONORE ANY CONTENT ON THE REVERSE SIDE 4, r �DF W A1'4 Q9 .Q ' r > r Mr. Mike Church Environmental Engineer Pharr Yarns, Inc. 100 Main Street McAdenville, North Carolina 28101 Dear Mr. Church: Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary North Carohna Department of Environment and Natural Resources December 13, 2006 Subject: Issuance of NPDES Permit Permit No. NC0004812 Pharr Yarns W WTP Gaston County Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director Division of Water Quality Division personnel have reviewed and approved your request for modification of the subject permit. Accordingly, we are forwarding the attached NPDES discharge permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statutes 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency dated May 9, 1994 (or as subsequently amended). Based on effluent guidelines from 40 CFR 410.70 Subpart G and a monthly average production value of 24000 lb/day (which will be used in the calculation of both daily maximum and monthly average limits), the revised limits are as follows: • Sulfide = 2.9 lbs/day (Monthly average); 5.8 Ibs/day (Daily maximum) • Phenol =1.4 Ibs/day (Monthly average); 2.9 Ibs/day (Daily maximum) • Total Chromium = 1.4 Ibs/day (Monthly average); 2.9 Ibs/day (Daily maximum) If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days following receipt of this letter. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings (6714 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714). Unless such demand is made, this decision shall be final and binding. Please note that this permit is not transferable except after notice to the Division. The Division may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit. This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the Division of Water Quality or permits required by the Division of Land Resources, the Coastal Area Management Act or any other Federal or Local governmental permit that may be required. If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact Agyeman Adu-Poku at telephone number (919) 733-5083, extension 508. Sincerely, /✓ P"''� W-42nfw— . Klimek, P.E. cc: Central File NPDES File Mooresville Regional Office/Surface Water Protection Aquatic Toxicology Unit DEH -f rl ��-na North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail ServiceCenter Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone (919) 733-7015 Customer Service Internet www.ncwateruualitv.ore Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax (919) 733.2496 1-877-623-6748 An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recyded/10% Post Consumer Paper Permit NC00048 f� , r STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY PERMIT TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT _DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and' regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the Fed-er^�Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, . Pharr Yarns, Incorporated is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at the Pharr Yarns Wastewater Treatment Plant 147 Willow Drive McAdenville Gaston County to receiving waters designated as the South Fork Catawba River in the Catawba River Basin in accordance with effluent 'limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions .set forth in Parts I, II, III and IV hereof. This permit shall become effective January 1-, 2007. This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on May 31, 2010. Signed this day- December 13, 2006. �BI✓Aidn W. Klimek, P.E., Director Division of Water Quality By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission Permit NC0004812 SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET All previous NPDES Permits issued to this facility, whether for operation or discharge are hereby revoked. As of this permit issuance, any previously issued permit bearing this number is no longer effective. Therefore, the exclusive authority to operate and discharge from this facility arises under . the permit conditions, requirements, terms, and provisions included herein. Pharr Yarns, Inc. is hereby authorized to: 1. Continue to operate an existing 1.0 MGD' wastewater treatment facility for the treatment of industrial and domestic wastewater that includes the following components: ➢ Extended aeration basin ➢ Two clarifiers with alum and polymer addition ➢ Two return activated sludge pumps ➢ Three mixed media pressure filters ➢ Two filter pumps Aerobic digester ➢ Sludge thickening tank Dewatering belt press Sludge ,storage and drying pad . ➢. 'Tablet type chlorinator ➢ Dual chlorine contactchamber ' This facility is located at the Pharr Yarns Wastewater Treatment Plant off Willow Drive near McAderiville in - Gaston :County. . 2. Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached map into the South Fork Catawba River, currently classified WS-V waters in the Catawba River Basin. Outfall 001'„ iuf nl w ra)Ww i r � - fir; ` r •ry( 1daY• liea".yaayM4E"1' V,. Pharr Yarns WWTP State Grld/Guad: F 14 SE / MT Holly, NC Permitted Flow: 1.0 MGD Latitude: 35° 15' 40" N Longitude: 81* 04' 39" W Receivine Stream: South Fork Catawba Sub -Basin: 03-OS-34 Drainage Basin: Catawba River Basin Stream Class: WS-V a V �t •tr..� ' '}i ill �'•1 G \ �Iv '. rl uw41= �T 41 .. ' I 1 14r�h i, ;}71tACN711C[ t �• � Facility Location not to scale NortT2 NPDES Permit No. NC0004812 Gaston Count I Permit NC0004812 k, A. (1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS During the period beginning on January 1, 2007 and lasting until the first time the monthly average flow exceeds 0.5 MGD, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below: PARAMETER Y � Y r LIMITS 1 f MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Monthly Average Daily Maximum Measurement $ Frequency. Sample ;TYPe Sample Locations Flow 0.5 MGD Continuous Recording Influent or Effluent BODs, 20oC 113.4pounds/day 181.0pounds/day Weekly Composite Effluent Total Suspended Solids 147.7pounds/day 249.7pounds/day Weekly Composite Effluent COD 475.0pounds/day 849.6pounds/day Weekly Composite Effluent Sulfide 2.9 poundslda 5.8pounds/day Weekly Composite Effluent Phenols 1.4pounds/day 2.9pounds/day Weekly Grab Effluent Total Chromium 1.4pounds/day 2.9 pounds/day Weekly Composite Effluent Fecal Coliform(geometric mean 200/100 mL 400/100 mL Weekly Grab Effluent, U & D NH3-N Weekly Composite Effluent Dissolved Oxygen Weekly Grab Effluent, U & D H2 Weekly Grab Effluent Temperature Daily Grab Effluent Temperature s Grab U & D Conductivity Weekly Grab Effluent, U & D Total Nitrogen (NO2 + NO3 + TKN)3 No Effluent Limitation (mg/L) No Effluent Limitation (lb/month) (3) 3 13,698 Ib/year (annual mass loading) (� Weekly Composite Effluent Monthly Calculated Effluent Annual) y (Calculated) d ( ) E Total Phosphorus3 No Effluent Limitation (mg/L) No Effluent Limitation (lb/month) cal 1522 lb/year (annual mass loading) (3) Weekly Composite Effluent Month) Calculated Effluent Annually (Calculated) Effluent Color4 Monthly Composite Effluent Color4 Monthly Grab U & D Chronic Toxicity5 Quarterly Composite Effluent Total Residual Chlorine 28 /L Weekly Grab Effluent Notes: 1 U: upstream 50 feet or more above the discharge point. D: downstream at Highway 7 bridge. Instreami monitoring shall be conducted 3/week from June through September and once per week the remainder of the year. 2 The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units 3 The annual mass loading for total nitrogen and total phosphorus for Outfall 001 shall be monitored and calculated as prescribed in A. (5.). 4 See A. (6.) for more information on the permit requirements associated with color. Effluent color samples shall be taken year-round on a monthly basis. Instream sampling shall be performed on a monthly basis from April through October. 5 Chronic toxicity (Ceriodaphnia, P/F test at 0.62%) tests shall be performed in January, April, July and October [see A. (3.].) There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts. Permit NC00048 n A.(2.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS During the period beginning on the month following the first time.the monthly average flow exceeds 0.5- MGD and lasting until permit expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall 001. Such discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specif ed below: PARAMETER " ` F, LIMITS MONITORING REQUIREMENTS iq y t ... x ; Monthl Avera e ` y, g Dail Maxlmum y Measurement Frequency Sample'.,. • Sam 15 T' e Sam le Location! p Flow 1.0 MGD Continuous Recording Influent or Effluent BOD5, 200C 204.7pounds/day 318.0pounds/day 3/Week Grab Effluent Total Sus ended'Solids. 239.0pounds/day 386.7pounds/day 3/Week Grab Effluent COD 675.9pounds/day 1150.9pounds/day 3/Week Grab Effluent Sulfide 2.9pounds/day 5.8pounds/day Weekly Grab Effluent Phenols 1.4pounds/day 2.9pounds/day Weekly Grab Effluent Total Chromium 1.4pounds/day 2.9pounds/day Weekly Grab Effluent Fecal Coliform(geometric mean 200/100 mL 4001100 mL 3/Week Grab Effluent, U & D NH3-N 3/Week " Composite Effluent Dissolved Oxygen 3/Week Grab Effluent, U & D H2 3/Week Grab Effluent Temperature Daily Grab Effluent ' Temperature Grab Upstream, Downstream Conductivity,3/Week Grab Effluent, U & D Total Nitrogen (NO2 + NO3 +TKN)3 No Effluent Limitation (mg/L) No Effluent Limitation (lb/month) (3) 27397 lb/year (annual mass loading) (3) Weekly " Composite Effluent Monthly Calculated Effluent Annual) y (Calculated) ( lated) Effluent Total Phosphorus3 No Effluent Limitation (mg/L) No Effluent Limitation (lb/month) (3) 3044 lb/year (annual mass loading) (3) Weekly Composite Effluent Monthly Calculated Effluent Annually (Calculated) Effluent Color4 Monthly Composite Effluents Color4 Monthly Grab Upstream, Downstream6 Chronic Toxicit 5 Quarterly Composite Effluent, Total Residual Chlorine 28 /L 3/Week Grab Effluent — Notes: There.shall be no discharge -of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts. Ni Permit NC0004812 A. (3.) CHRONIC TOXICITY MONITORING/LIMIT — 0.5-MGD The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality to Ceriodaphnia dubia at an effluent concentration of 0.62%. The permit holder. shall perform at a minimum, quarterly monitoring using test procedures outlined in the "North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised February 1998, or subsequent versions or "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent, versions. The tests will be performed during the months of January, April, July and October. Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the: NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes. If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in a failure or ChV below the permit limit, then multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum, in each of the two following months as described in "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions. The chronic value for multiple concentration tests will be determined using the geometric mean of the highest concentration having no detectable impairment of reproduction or survival and the lowest concentration that does have a detectable impairment of reproduction or survival. The definition. of "detectable impairment," collection methods, exposure regimes, and further statistical methods are specified in the "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised - February 1998) or subsequent versions. All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the months in which tests were performed, using the parameter code TGP3B for the pass/fail results and T14P313 for the Chronic Value. Additionally, DWQ Form AT-3 (original) is to be sent to the following address: Attention: North Carolina Division of Water Quality Environmental Sciences Section 1621 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621 Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Branch no later than 30 days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made. Test data shall be'compiete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and all concentration/response data, and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved designate signature. Total residual chlorineof the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream. Should there be no discharge- of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, the permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The report shallbe submitted to the Environmental Sciences Branch at the address cited above. Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, monitoring will be required during the following month. Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of Water Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re- opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits. NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following the month of the initial monitoring. Permit.NC00048 k2 A. (4.) CHRONIC TOXICITY MONITORING/LIMIT — 1.0-MGD The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant mortality to Cedodaphnia dubia at an effluent concentration of 1-.2%. The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, auarterlU monitoring using test procedures outlined in the "North Carolina. Ceriodaphnia, Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised February 1998, or subsequent versions or "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions. The tests will be performed during the months of January, AprU, July and October. Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes. If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in a failure or ChV below the permit limit, then multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum, in each of the two following months as described in "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity -Test Procedure" (Revised -February 1998} or subsequent versions. The chronic value for multiple concentration tests will be determined using the geometric mean of the highest concentration having no detectable impairment of reproduction or survival and the lowest concentration that does have a detectable impairment of reproduction or survival. The definition of "detectable impairment," collection methods, exposure regimes, and further statistical methods are specified in the "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised- February 1998) or subsequent versions. All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the months in which tests were performed, using the ' parameter code TGP3B for the pass/fail results and THP3B for the Chronic Value. Additionally, DWQ Form AT-3 (original) is to be sent to the following address: Attention: North.Carolina Division• of Water Quality Environmental Sciences Section 1621 Mail Service 'Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621 Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Branch no later than 30 days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made. Test data shall be complete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and all concentration/response data, and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved designate signature. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream. ' Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is 'required, the permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT) test form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of the report with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The report shall be submitted to the Environmental Sciences Branch at the address cited above. Should ,the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required, monitoring will be required during the following month. Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed. by the. North Carolina Division of Water Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re- opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits. NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and'appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed no later than the last day of the month following the month of the initial monitoring. '� v Permit NC0004812 A.(5.) TOTAL NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS MONITORING The Permittee shall calculate the annual mass loading of total nitrogen as the sum of monthly loadings, according to the following equations: (a) Monthly Mass Loading (pounds/month) =. TN/TP x Q x 8.34 where: TN = the average total nitrogen concentration (mg/ L) of the composite samples collected during the month at the otitfall TP = The average total phosphorus concentration (mg/ L) of the composite samples collected during the month at the outfall Q = the total wastewater flow discharged during the month at the outfall(MG/ month) 8.34 = conversion factor, from (mg& x MG) to pounds (b) Annual Mass Loading (lb/yr) = E (Monthly Mass Loadings) for the calendar year The Permittee shall report the total nitrogen and total phosphorus concentration for each sample and the monthly mass loading in the appropriate self -monitoring report and the annual mass loading of total nitrogen and total phosphorus in the December self -monitoring report for the year. A. (6.) Color Permitting Requirements for Tier 1 Facility This facility has been classified as a Tier 1 color discharger. The permittee will conduct color monitoring of instream stations (upstream, downstream) on a monthly basis during summer season (April -October). The permittee will record whether a color plume was observed around the outfall pipe during the monthly instream sampling events, and include that information on the monthly discharge monitoring report. Effluent samples will be collected monthly for color on a year-round basis. Color samples will be analyzed for ADMI color at natural pH. Effluent samples will consist of 24-hour composites, while instream samples will be collected as grabs. Samples will be analyzed by a state certified laboratory. If data show that water quality standards for color are being violated by the discharge permitted by the terms of this permit, then the Director may reopen 'this permit for the purpose of imposing additional requirements pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0114. Alternatively, if future conditions change and color is no longer a component of the:influent wastestream, then the permittee may request a permit modification to remove color permit requirements. DENR/DWQ AMENDMENT TO AMENDED FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT NPDES No. NC0004812 Facility Information Applicant/Facility Name: Pharr Yams, Inc. Applicant Address: 100 Main Street, McAdenville, NC 28101 Facility Address: 147 Willow Drive, McAdenville, NC 28101 Permitted Flow 0.5/1.0 MGD Type of Waste: 100% htdustrial Facility/Permit Status: Class I/Active; Renewal County: Gaston County Miscellaneous Receiving Stream: South Fork Regional Office: MRO Catawba River Stream Classification: WS-V State Grid / USGSQuad: F14SE/Mount Holly 303(d) Listed? No Permit Writer: Agyeman Adu-Poke Subbasin: 03-08-36 Date: November 9, 2006 Drainage Area (fs) 125 636 Summer 7 10 (cfs) 125 Winter 7Q10 (cfs): 228 30 2 cfs 310 Average Flow (cfs): 808 IWC (%): 1.2 Lat. 35° 15' 40" N Long. 81004' 39" W BASIS FOR PERMIT MODIFICATION Pharr Yarns has requested that the limits for sulfide, phenols, and total chromium that were assigned in the January 21, 2005 permit be reevaluated. A review of the spreadsheet used in calculating limitations based on plant production data and effluent guidelines from 40 CFR 410.70 Subpart G STOCK AND YARN FINISHING SUBCATEGORY shows that limits were assigned based on only a percentage of plant process flow. The correct effluent limits for sulfide, phenols and total chromium, while calculated on the attached spreadsheet, were not assigned in the 2005 permit. This abbreviated fact sheet recommends a modification in the limits for the three parameters. The previous permit writer had conferred with EPA about the monthly average production value that should be used and it was decided that 24000 pounds per day would be appropriate for calculation of daily maximum and monthly average limits. This modification is to apply the appropriate limits as calculated by effluent guidelines. The correct limits are listed below and all limits should be in lbs/day EXISTING LIMITS TO BE MODIFIED POLLUTANT DAILY MAX MONTHLY AVERAGE Sulfide 2.3 0.8 Phenol 1.2 0.4 Total Chromium 1.2 0.4 Fact Sheet NPDES NC0004812 Renewal Page I CHANGES TO THE PERMIT Revised limits for sulfide, phenols and total chromium will be given based on monthly average production value of 24000 lbs/day projected for 2005. This monthly average production number was used to calculate both the monthly average and daily maximum limits. There should be no adjustment for percentage of process flow. The revised limits will be higher than those given in 2005 permit. COMPARING WATER QUALITY LIMITS AND EFFLUENT LIMITATION GUIDELINE (ELG) Reasonable potential analysis (RPA) was performed for sulfide, chromium and phenol at both the outfall in North Carolina waters and at the State line in South Carolina waters. The RPA at the borderline was based on a very conservative estimate of the summer 7Q10 (223 cfs) of the South Fork Catawba River. See the attached RPA spreadsheet for details. The Tables below compare water quality limits in both States to the effluent limitation guideline, and the most stringent limits of the two are applied in this permit with the exception of the SC standard and the corresponding allowable for sulfide. The comparative limits in Tables 3-6 are all in mg/L. TABLE 3. AVERAGE FLOW OF 0.5 MGD PARAMETERS WQS - NC LIMITS ELG-MONTHLY AVE. ELG-DAILY MAX. SULFIDE NO NC WQS 0.70 1.40 TOTAL CHROMIUM 1.02 0.34 0.70 PHENOL NO NC WQS 0.34 0.70 TABLE 4. AVERAGE FLOW OF 0.5 MGD PARAMETERS WQS - SC LIMITS ELG-MONTHLY AVE. ELG-DAILY MAX. SULFIDE 0.58 0.70 1.40 CHROMIUM III NO RP 0.34 0.70 CHROMIUM IV NO RP 0.34 0.70 PHENOL NO RP 0.34 0.70 TABLE 5. AVERAGE FLOW OF 1.0 MGD PARAMETERS WQ - NC LIMITS ELG-MONTHLY AVE. ELG-DAILY MAX. SULFIDE NO NC WQS 0.35 0.70 TOTAL CHROMIUM 1.02 0.17 0.35 PHENOL NO NC WQS 0.17 0.35 TABLE 6. AVERAGE FLOW OF 1.0 MGD PARAMETERS WQ - SC LIMITS ELG-MONTHLY AVE. ELG-DAILY MAX. SULFIDE 0.29 0.35 0.70 CHROMIUM III NO RP 0.17 0.35 CHROMIUM VI 1.59 0.17 0.35 PHENOL NO RP 0.17 0.35 Fact Sheet NPDES NC)004812 Renewal Page 2 Sulfide — NC has no water quality standard so ELG limit will be protective in NC. In regards to SC water quality standards, there will likely be no presence of sulfide at the NC/SC State line, assuming dissipation of sulfide and also taking into account 8.5 miles distance from the outfall to the State line. Total Chromium — Both NC and SC water quality standards are less stringent than the ELG limit so ELG limit is applied in this permit. Phenol — NC has no water quality standard for phenol. SC's standard is above the ELG so ELG limit is applied in this permit. The Division of Water Quality has determined that the increased limits will not result in contravention of applicable water quality standards or loss of the river's designated uses. An alternative analysis was not performed because there was no increase in wasteflow or change in the effluent characteristics from the facility. Due to the stringency of the limits, the instream waste concentration of 0.62 % under 7Q10 conditions and the discharge point 8.5 miles above the month of the South Fork Catawba River before its confluence into the Catawba River, DWQ does not believe that the discharge of sulfide, phenols or total chromium. from Pharr Yarns will affect the water quality in South Carolina. The distance to the NC/SC'State line and the amount of stream flow makes it unlikely that the SC standards for these parameters will be violated. WHOLE EFFLUENT TOXICITY (WET) TEST Type of Toxicity Test: Chronic-P/F, (Quarterly) Existing Limit: 001: Chronic P/F @ 0.62% Recommended Limit: 001:, Chronic. P/F @ 0.62% Monitoring Schedule: January, April, July, and October. The permittee has passed all of the nineteen WET tests from January 2002 to July 2006. See the attached WET testing summary. CONCLUSION Pharr Yarns, Inc., an embattled textile industry has done an excellent job passing all its toxicity tests for the past four years. Sulfide will likely not be considered parameter of concern at the State line where instream waste concentration (IWC) is 0.35% because at the outfall where IWC is 0.62%, there is no indication of toxicity problem. Research indicates that when soluble sulfide is discharged into water, it readily reacts with hydrogen ions and dissociates into equal forms of HS and HZS at pH 7 (NAS 1974). The fact that HzS is oxidized in well -aerated water by natural biological systems to sulfates or is biologically oxidized to elemental sulfur has caused investigators to minimize the toxic effects of HZS on fish and other aquatic life (Quality Criteria for Water, July 1976). Based on the above theory and the fact that the permittee. has passed all its toxicity tests at the outfall and assuming dissipation of sulfide, also considering that the discharge has to be transported 8.5 miles from the outfall to the State line, NC strongly believes that sulfide will most likely not be detected at the State line. Fact Sheet NPDES NC0004812 Renewal Page 3 PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF ISSUANCE Draft Permit to Public Notice: April 14, 2006 Permit Scheduled to Issue: November 27, 2006 NPDES UNIT CONTACT If you have questions regarding any of the above information or on the attached permit, please contact Agyeman.Adu-Poke at (919) 733-5083 ext. 508. NAME • DATE Fact Sheet iNPDES NC?004812 Renewal Page 4 REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS Pharr Yarns, Inc. NC0004812 Time Period July 2004 - July 2006 Qw (MGD) 0.5' WWTP Class IV 7Q10S (cfs) 125 IWC (%) @ 7Q10S • 0.6162 7Q10W (cfs) 228 @ 7Q10W 0.3388 30Q2 (cfs) 310 @ 30Q2 0.2494 Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cfs) 808 @ QA 0.0958 Rec'ving Stream South Fork Catawba River Stream Class WS-V Outfall 001 Qw=0.5MGD STANDARDS & PARAMETER TYPE CRITERIA (2) PQL Units REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS RECOMMENDED ACTION NCWQS (t) NCWQSI %FAV/ n #Det MaxPndCw AllowableCw Chronic Acute Acute: N/A Sulfide NC 108 13 26.5 No, NCwater quality standards. _ _..,_ _ _ _ Chronic #VALUE[ _ _ _ _ _ Effluent limitation guideline'limitwill be applied. •, Acute: 1.022 Effluent limitation guideline limit will be applied. Chromium NC 0.05 1.022 mg/L 108 108 2.8 _ _ - - ---------------------------- Chronic 8 Acute: N/A Phenols A 0.001 N mg/L 107 41 0.8 _ _ _ _ _ No water quality standards. • _ _ _ _ _. _ Chronic 0.40 _ Effluent limitation guideline limit will be applied. ' Acute: N/A "Legend. •' Freshwater Discharge C = Carcinogenic NC = Non -carcinogenic A =Aesthetic npdes rpa-NC.5MGD, rpa 12/4/2006 REASONABLE. POTENTIAL ANALYSIS Pharr Yarns, Inc. NC0004812 Time Period July 2004 -July 2006 Qw (MGD) 1 WWtP Class IV 7Q10S (cfs) 125 /WC (%) @ 7Q10S 1.2248 7Q10W (cfs) 228 @ 7Q10W 0.6752 30Q2 (cfs) 310 @ 30Q2 0.4975 Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cfs) 808 @ QA 0.1915 Rec'ving Stream South Fork Catawba River Stream Class WS-V Outfall 001 Qw = 1 MGD STANDARDS & PARAMETER TYPE CRITERIA (2) PQL Units REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS RECOMMENDED ACTION NCWQS NCWQSI Y,,FAV/ n #Det MaxPmdCw AllowableCw Chronic Acute Acute: N/A Sulfide NC mg/L 108 13 26.5 _ _ _ _ __ No quality standards: _ _ _ _ Chronic #VALUEI _' Effluent, limitation guideline limit will, .be applied. Acute: 1.022 Effluent limitation guideline limit will be applied because its Chromium NC 0.050 1.022 mg/L 108 108 2.8 more protective of NC waters' Chronic_ 4.08 - ---------.----------.-------- Acute: N/A Phenols A 0.0010 N mg/L 107 41 0.8 _ _ _ _ __ No quality standards., ,_ _ _ _ _ _ _ Chronic 0.20 Effluent limitation guideline limit will be applied. Acute: N/A "Legend. "" Freshwater Discharge C = Carcinogenic NC = Non -carcinogenic A =Aesthetic npdes rpa-NCIMGD, rpa 12/4/2006 REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS Pharr Yarns, Inc. N C0004812 Time Period July 2004 - July 2006 Qw (MGD) 0.5 WWTP Class IV 7Q10S (cfs) 223 /WC (%) @ 7Q10S 0.3463 7Q10W (cfs) 228 @ 7Q10W 0.3388 30Q2 (cfs) 310 @ 30Q2 0.2494 Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cfs) 808 @ QA 0.0958 Rec'ving Stream South Fork Catawba River Stream Class WS-V Outfall 001 Qw = 0.5 MGD STANDARDS & PARAMETER TYPE CRITERIA (2) PQL Units REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS RECOMMENDED ACTION SCWQS (t) NCWQS/ %FAV/ n #Det MaxPredCw AllowableCw Chronic Acute Acute: N/A Assuming dissipation of sulfide, NC believes . Sulfide NC 0.002 mg/L 108 13 26.5 there will not be sulfide af.NC/SC boardedine so ELG will _ Chronic 0.58 ------ ------ ---------------- protect water quality at the borderline. Acute: N/A Chromium III NC 0.028 mg/L 108 108 2.8 No reasonable_ potential _ _ _ _ _ Chronic_ 8.08 Effluent limitation guideline limit for total for chromium will be.applied. Acute: N/A Phenols A 21.000 N mg/L 107 41 0.8 No reasonable_ potential _ _ _ _ Chronic_ 8,421.00 _ _ _ _ _ Effluent limitation guideline limit will be applied. Acute: N/A Chromium VI NC 0.011 mg/L 108 108 2.8 No_ reasonable_ potential _ _ _ _ _ Chronic 3.18 _° Effluent limitation guideline limit for total chromium will be applied. Legend. C = Carcinogenic NC = Non -carcinogenic A = Aesthetic " Freshwater Discharge npdes rpa-SC.5MGD, rpa 12/4/2006 REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS Pharr Yarns, Inc. NC0004812- Time Period July 2004 - July 2006 Qw (MGD) 1 WWTP Class IV 7Q10S (cfs) 223 IWC (%) @ 7Q10S 0.6903 7Q10W (cfs) 228 @ 7Q10W 0.6752 30Q2 (cfs) 310 @ 30Q2 0.4975 Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cfs) 808 @ QA 0.1915 Rec'ving Stream South Fork Catawba River Stream Class WS-V Outfall 001 Qw = 1 MGD STANDARDS & PARAMETER TYPE CRITERIA (2) PQL Units REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS RECOMMENDED ACTION SCWQS (1) NCWQS/ FAV/ Chronic Acute n #Det MaxPredCw AllowableCw Acute: N/A Assuming dissipation sulfide, NC believes Sulfide NC 0.002 mg/L 108 13 26.5 there will not be sulfide at NC/SC,boarderline soELG will - - -------- - Chronic: 0.290 -`-- --- ----- - - --_ - protect, water quality at the borderline. Acute: N/A Chromium 111 NC 0.028 mg/L 108 108 2.8 No reasonable_ potential •_ Chronic_ 4.06 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Effluent limitation guideline for total chromium will be applies Acute: N/A Phenols A 21.000 N mg/L 107 41 0.8 No reasonable potential, _ _ _ _ _ Chronic 4,221.00 Effluent limitation guideline for total chromium will be applies Acute: N/A Chromium VI NC 0.011 mg/L 108 108 2.8 _ _ _ _ _ Chronic 1.59 _ _ _' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Effluent limitation" guideline limit for total chromium, will be applied at the outfall because its more protective Acute: N/A r.egeno: rresnwarer urscnarge C = Carcinogenic NC = Non -carcinogenic A = Aesthetic npdes rpa-SC1MGD, rpa 12/4/2006 Pharr Yarns` (NC0004812)- Permit Modification Subject: Pharr Yarns (NC0004812)- Permit Modification From: Agyeman Adu-Poku <Agyeman.Adupoku@ncmail.net> Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2006 11:21:12 -0500 To: vickermg@dhec.sc.gov CC: Susan Wilson <susan.a.wilson@ncmail.net> Melinda, , Pharr Yarns WWTP's permit modification has been re -assigned to Nowell had to go on medical leave. We apologize for the delay in addressing SC concerns on this modification. I will like to to address all your concerns so that the permit can be issued delays. me because Jackie take this opportunity without further Just a recap of the key issues with this permit, NC DWQ issued a permit to Pharr Yarns, Inc. in January 2005 with miscalculated limits which were developed from 40 CFR Part 410.10 Subpart G. The permittee was issued civil penalties and after further review of the limits we�realized the error. The permit was then drafted with the correct permit limits, noticed and EPA approved the draft. SC had concerns about the new limits as to whether it would protect SC waters. Based on a very conservative estimate of the summer 7Q10 (223 cfs) of the South Fork Catawba River at the NC/SC border line with a discharge flow of 0.5 MGD, approximately 8.5 miles from the outfall, a reasonable potential analysis was performed for sulfide, chromium and phenol using SC water quality standards. Considering all the variables involved in this situation, NC believes that SC waters will be protected (See data for details). Although the permit includes an effluent limitation page for 1.0 MGD, NC believes that the permittee will never reach that capacity within this permit cycle based on the last two years effluent data and the known volatility history of textile industry. See the attachment for all the data used. Please let me have your comments as soon as possible (preferably by Nov. 24th). For your convenience, we will be happy to schedule a conference call with you if you like. If no comment is.received by the said.date, we will move forward with a final permit. Thanks a lot for your cooperation on this matter. If you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call at (919) 733-5083 ext. 508 or you can always reach me by an email. Thanks a lot. Agyeman Agyeman Adu-Poku <agyeman.adupoku a,ncmail.net> Environmental Engineer Department of Environment & Natural Resources Division of Water Quality-NPDES Unit Content -Type: application/msword 4812-Fact Sheet-mod2006.doc Content -Encoding: base64 Content -Type: application/msword� 4812-effluent-2006.d0 c Content -Encoding: base64 1 of 2 12/4/2006 10:05 AN Pharr Yams (NCO0048lZ+Permit Modification -- ---------'- — ------ -' Content -Type: applicafion/vnd.ms-excel )MR—review—template-Fl Content -En coding: base64 Content -Type: application/vnd.ms-excel -Encoding: base64 Content Content -Type: application/vnd.ms-excel Content -Encoding: base64 / / 3npdes rpa-SC.5MGD.xlsL! |� Content -Encoding: base64 � Content -Encoding: base64 ' IF Content -Type: application/pH � 2of2 12/4/200610:05AM TEXTILE EFFLUENT LIMITS SPREADSHEET PERMIT NO: NC0004812 PERMITTEE: PHARR YARNS, INC. COUNTY: GASTON PERMITTED FLOW: 0.5 MGD BASED ON 40CFR410.70 SUBPART G STOCK AND YARN FINISHING SUBCATEGORY PRODUCTION DATA: DAILY MAX. 24000 according to EPA recommendation MONTHLY AVG. 24000 rKVmvUVMK W./UDU6YAK1 U tall nmism 6.8 84.6 17.4 e 0.24 t 0.12 Chromium 0.12 must be bets n 6 and 9 at all times LIMITS POLLUTANT BOD5 163.2 81.6 COD 2030.4 1015.2 TSS 417.6 208.8 Sulfide 5.8 2.9 Phenol 2.9 1.4 Total Chromium 2.9 1.4 pH must be between 6 and 9 at all times FOR PHARR YARNS, ONLY 27% OF FLOW IS Lllwl I J XVVVRUINY L-T: 44.1 548.2 112.8 e 1.6 /I 0.8 Chromium 0.8 must be between 6 and 9 at all times FINAL LIMITS 181.0 849.6 249.7 e 2.3 of 1.2 Chromium 1.2 must be between 6 and 9 at all times DOMESTIC WASTE IS 73%, ADD ALLOCATION FOR THAT ANT MAX GODS IDAILY13 91.3 B(S O IMO 91.3 COD 301.3659 200.9106 113.4I• original BOO limits were 390 lb/day (monthly ave) 475.0 and 780 lb/day (daily max), so these limits are still 147.7 orotective of DO TEXTILE EFFLUENT LIMITS SPREADSHEET PERMIT NO: PERMITTEE: COUNTY: h tu1011 a, NC0004812 PHARR YARNS, INC. GASTON 1 MGD BASED ON 40CFR410.70 SUBPART G STOCK AND YARN FINISHING SUBCATEGORY PRODUCTION DATA (in Ibs/day): DAILY MAX. 24000 according to EPA recommendation MONTHLY AVG. 240 00 FROM 40CFR 410.70 SUBPART G (all limits in Ibs/1000 Ibs) POLLUTANT DAILY MAX MONTHLY AVERAGN.. , BODS 6.8 3.4 COD 84.6 42.3 TSS 17.4 8.7 Sulfide 0.24 0.12 Phenol 0.12 0.06 Total Chromium 0.12 0.06 pH must be between 6 and 9 at all times LIMITS POLLUTAj , DAILY MAX MONTHLY AVERAGE BODS 163.2 81.6 COD 2030.4 1015.2 TSS 417.6 208.8 Sulfde 5.8 2.9 Phenol 2.9 1.4 Total Chromium 2.9 1.4 pH must be between 6 and 9 at all times FOR PHARR YARNS, ONLY 27% OF FLOW IS PROCESS FLOW ADJUST LIMITS ACCORDINGLY: 44.1 22.0 548.2 274.1 112.8 56.4 e 1.6 O.E tl 0.8 0.4 Chromium 0.8 0.4 must be between 6 and 9 at all times FINAL LIMITS i 318.0 1150.9 386.7 e 2.3 31 1.2 Chromium 1.2 9 at all times DOMESTIC WASTE IS 73%, ADD ALLOCATION FOR THAT POS POLLUTANT AVERAGE ITS (DAILY 274 OIMONTHLY CODS 602.7318 401.8212 �e�"liy 1 original BOD limits were 390lb/day (monthly ave) nd 780 lb/day (daily max), so these limits are still rotective of DO 02/15/06 11:38, HORIZON ENGINEERING & CONSULTING a PHARR YARNS TRAF max Summary 410.73�6AT - ,� and 410.72 IEPA_Limitations in 40 CFR _ _ Effluent Limits - Effluent Parameter lbs/1000 Ibs of roduct Ibs/da-�-------" Dail Max TComments+ 30 day av Dail Max 30 da av . BOD5 6.8 3.40 333 129 BAT C� 84.6 42,30 4,145 1,607 BAT 7aS 17.4 8.70 853 Suicide 3 31 BAT 0.2 4 0.12 11.8 4.6 BAT Phenols 0.12 0.06 Total Chromiu 5 2.3 BAT 0.12 0.06 5.9 H 6.0-9.0 6.0-9.0 6.0.9.0 ,3 BAT 6.0-2.0 _Production numbs -------J---'__ �_- numbers are based on letter and into submitted b aP licant 7124%g6. Data- from 4/1/94�- 3/29/96. 1 NO.706 Montht -- S day - based on max. machines production ' _- Yavg. (38.220 Ibs/da - actual avera i -- Per Mike Church --_._ ..- Y _ _�.._.._.... 9 e�_ --- , - --- - i - - _. Ch _ age o erating dam is 9.5 6 da s - -T__-� 9221 �er week,'� ._..._ Allowance far Sanita W Flow see Ittr. 6/26/96' and # 8 on a lication I :Seconda Con Ibs/da mon, av Dail max BADS ' _f-__ - ,�.�b:Z-= --�-�� max 3 0 52.79 4 5i 79`19' 30 52.79 451 7 9.1 9 _ 1=ffluent Limits - Effluent Para - Ibs/da r BOD5 Dail Max 30 da av ��- � 41 2 182 _ TSS 4 145 1,607 -' Sulfide 932 -- 383 f Phenols 11.8 .6 Total Chroml H 5.9 5 9 2 ,3 2.3 � i 6.0-9.0 6.0.9.0 -`--I- - r- Page 1 - W*d-j APPENDIX: WATER QUALITY NUMERIC CRITERIA FOR THE PROTECTION OF AQUATIC LIFE AND HUMAN HEALTH This appendix contains three charts (priority pollutants, nonpriority pollutants, and organoleptic effects) of numeric criteria for the protection ofhuman health and aquatic life. The appendix also contains three attachments which address hardness conversions and application of ammonia criteria. Footnotes specific to each chart follow the chart. General footnotes pertaining to all are at the end of the charts prior to the attachments. Please refer to the text of the regulation for other general information and specifications in applying these numeric criteria. PRIORITY TOXIC POLLUTANTS Freshwater Aquatic Life Saltwater Aquatic Life Human Health For Consumption of: CAS CMC CCC CMC CCC FR Cite/ Priority Pollutant Number (µg/L) (µg/L) (µg/L) (/sg/L) Water& Organism MCL Source Organism Only (µ91L) (ug/L) (pg/L) 5.6 640 6 65FR66443 1 Antimony7440360 B,« B,ne to SDWA 340 150 69 36 0.018 0.14 10 65FR31682 2 Arsenic 7440382 A, D. K A, D, K A, D, Y A, D, Y C, R, ff C, R, ff C 57FR60848 SDWA 44 65FR31682 3 Beryllium 7440417 1, ee 1,ee SDWA 0.53 0.10 43 9.3 5 65FR31682 4 Cadmium 7440439 D, E, K D, E, K D, Y D. Y J. x 1, to to SDWA 580 28 100 Tani EPA820/13-96-001 Sa Chromium III 16065831 D, E, K D, E, K l• ee l• C0 to 65FR31682 SDWA 16 11 1,100 50 100 Taal 65FR31682 5b Chromium VI 18540299 D,K D,K D,Y D,Y l <e lee to SDWA 6 Copper 7440508 3.8 2.9 5.8 3.7 1,300 65FR31682 D, E, K, Z D, E, K. Z D. Z, Y, to D. Z. Y, to T, to 7 Lead 7439921 14 0.54 220 8.5 65FR31682 D, E,Y D, E.Y D,Y D,Y ' 8 Mercury 7439976 L6 0.91 2.1 1.1 0.050 0.051 2 65FR31682 D, K dd D, K dd D. bb, dd D, bb. dd B, to B. to x SDWA 36 Freshwater Aquatic Life Saltwater Aquatic Life Human Health For Consumption of-. CAS CIVIC CCC CMC CCC FR Cite/ Priority Pollutant Number (1sg/L) G41-) G491L) (ig/L) Water & Organism MCL Source Organism Only (Ug/L) Gd9IL) (14L) 36 1, 2-Trans- 156605 700 140,000 100 65FR31682 Dichloroethylene B,« B,« « SDWA 37 1, I, 1-Trichloroethane 71556 J,ee 200 65FR31682 ee SDWA 38 1, 1, 2-Trichloroethane 79005 0.59 16 5 65FR66443 B,C B,C C SDWA 39 Trichloroeth lene y 79016 2.5 30 5 65FR66443 C C C SDWA 2.0 530 - 2 65FR66443 - 40 Vinyl Chloride 75014 C C c SDWA 41 2-Chlorophenol 95578 81 150 65FR66443B, T, ee B, T, m 42 2,4-Dichlorophenol 120832 77 290 65FR66443 B, T, ee B, T, . 43 2,4-Dimethylphenol 105679 380 850 65FR66443 B, T, ee B, T, « 2-Methyl- 4, 6- 13 280 65FR66443 44 Dinitrophenol 534521 ee ee 45 2,4-Dinitrophenol 51285 69 5,300 65FR66443 B. ee B, « 19 15 13 7.9 0.27 3.0 1 65FR31682 46 Pentachlorophenol 87865 F. K F, K v v B. C B, C. H C 65FR66443 SDWA 47 Phenol 108952 21,000 1,700,000 65FR66443 B, T, « B, H, T, ee 48 2, 4, 6-Trichlorophenol 88062 1.4 2A 65FR66443 B, C,T B,C 39 Freshwater Aquatic Life Saltwater Aquatic Life Human Health For Consumption of. CAS Non Priority Pollutant Number FR Cite/Source CMC CCC CMC CCC Water& Organism MCL WIL) (µg/L) (µg/L) (,g/L) Organism Only (µg/L) (YPiL) (Vg/L) 49 Salinity NARRATIVE STATEMENT - SEE TEXT Gold Book 50 Simazine 122349 4 SDWA Solids Suspended and NARRATIVE STATEMENT AND NUMERIC CRITERIA - SEE TEXT Gold Book 51 Turbidity State Standard 52 Styrene 100425 100 L SDWA 53 Sulfide -Hydrogen Sulfide 7783064 2.0 E0 - Gold Book 54 Tainting Substances NARRATIVE STATEMENT- SEE TEXT Gold Book 55 SPECIES DEPENDENT CRITERIA - SEE TEXT Red Book Temperature / 56 1, 2, 4, 5-Tetrachlorobennne 95943 0.97 1.1 D D 65FR66443 57 Tributyltin (TBT) 688733 0.46 0.063 0.37 0.010 EPA 822-F-00-008 58 2, 4, 5-Trichlomphenol 95954 8800 3,600 65FR66443 59 X lens, Total y 10,000 L SDWA 60 Uranium 30 SDWA Freshwater Aquatic Life Saltwater Aquatic Life Human Health For Consumption of - CAS CMC CCC CMC CCC FR Cite/ Priority Pollutant Number (}sg/L) (Ug/L) (Ug/L) (yg/L) Water & Organism MCL Source Organism Only (AzglL) (g/L) (Ug/L) 0.52 0.0038 0.053 0.0036 0.000039 0.000039B, 0.2 65FR31682 101 Heptachlor Epoxide 1024573 G, U G, U, x G, U G, U, x B, C C C 65FR66443 SDWA Polychlorinated 0.014 M, x 0.03 M, x 0.000064 0.000064 0.5 B, C, M B, C, M C 65FR31682 102 Biphenyls PCBs -- 65FR66443 SDWA 103 Toxaphene 8001352 0.73 0.0002 0.21 0.0002 0.00028 0.00028 3 65FR31682 x x B,C B,C C 65FR66443 SDWA Footnotes: A This water quality criterion was derived from data for arsenic (III), but is applied here to total arsenic, which might imply that arsenic (III) and arsenic (V) are equally toxic to aquatic life and that their toxicities are additive. In the arsenic criteria document (EPA 440/5-84-033, January 1985), Species Mean Acute Values are given for both arsenic (III) and arsenic (V) for five species and the ratios ofthe SMAVs for each species range from 0.6 to 1.7. Chronic values are available for both arsenic (III) and arsenic (V) for one species; for the fathead minnow, the chronic value for arsenic (V) is 0.29 times the chronic value for arsenic (III). No data are known to be available concerning whether the toxicities of the forms of arsenic to aquatic organisms are additive. B This criterion has been revised to reflect The Environmental Protection Agency's ql * or RfD, as contained in the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) as of May 17, 2002. The fish tissue bioconcentration factor (BCF) from the 1980 Ambient Water Quality Criteria document was retained in each case. - C This criterion is based on carcinogenicity of 10-6 risk. As prescribed in Section E of this regulation, application of this criterion for permit effluent limitations requires the use annual average flow or comparable tidal condition as determined by the Department. D Freshwater and saltwater criteria for metals are expressed in terms of total recoverable metals. As allowed in Section E of this regulation, these criteria may be expressed as dissolved metal for the purposes of deriving permit effluent limitations. The dissolved metal water quality criteria value may be calculated by using these 304(a) aquatic life criteria expressed in terms of total recoverable metal, and multiplying it by a conversion factor (CF). The term "Conversion Factor" (CF) represents the conversion factor for converting a metal criterion expressed as the total recoverable fraction in the water column to a criterion expressed as the dissolved fraction in the water column. (Conversion Factors for saltwater CCCs are not currently available. Conversion factors derived for saltwater CMCs have been used for both saltwater CMCs and CCCs). See "Office of Water Policy and Technical Guidance on Interpretation and Implementation of Aquatic Life Metals Criteria", October 1,1993, by Martha G. Prothro, Acting Assistant Administrator for Water, available from the Water Resource center, USEPA, 401 M St., SW, mail code RC4100,Washington, DC 20460; and 46CFR§ 131.36(b)(1). Conversion Factors can be found in Attachment 1 — Conversion Factors for Dissolved Metals. E The freshwater criterion for this metal is expressed as a function of hardness (mg/L) in the water column. The value given here corresponds to a hardness of 25 mg/L as expressed as CaCO3. Criteria values for other hardness may be calculated from the following: CMC (dissolved) = exp{mA [ln(hardness)]+ bA) (CF), or CCC (dissolved) = exp{mc [In (hardness)]+ bc) (CF) and the parameters specified in Attachment 2 — Parameters for Calculating Freshwater Dissolved Metals Criteria That Are Hardness -Dependent. As noted in footnote D above, the values in this appendix are expressed as total recoverable, the criterion may be calculated from the following: CMC (total) = exp{mA [In( hardness)]+ bA), or CCC (total) = exp{mc [In (hardness)]+ bc). F Freshwater aquatic life values for pentachlorophenol are expressed as a function of pH, and are calculated as follows: CMC = exp(1.005(pH)-4.869); CCC = exp(1.005(pH)-5.134). Values displayed in table correspond to a pH of 7.8. G This criterion is based on 304(a) aquatic life criterion issued in 1980, and was issued in one of the following documents: Aldrin/Dieldrin (EPA 440/5-80-019), Chlordane (EPA 440/5-80-027), DDT (EPA 440/5-80- 038), Endosulfan (EPA 440/5-80-046), Endrin (EPA 440/5-80-047), Heptachlor (440/5-80-052), Hexachlorocyclohexane (EPA 440/5-80-054), Silver (EPA 440/5-80-071).. The Minimum Data Requirements and derivation procedures were different in the 1980 Guidelines than in the 1985 Guidelines. For example, a "CMC" derived using the 1980 Guidelines was derived to be used as an instantaneous maximum. If assessment is to be done using an averaging period, the values given should be divided by 2 to obtain a value that is more comparable to a CMC derived using the 1985 Guidelines. H No criterion for protection of human health from consumption of aquatic organisms excluding water was presented in the 1980 criteria document or in the 1986 Quality Criteria for Water. Nevertheless, sufficient information was presented in the 1980 document to allow the calculation of a criterion, even though the results of such a calculation were not shown in the document. I This criterion for asbestos is the Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) developed under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) and the National Primary Drinking Water Regulation (NPDWR). J EPA has not calculated a 304(a) human health criterion for this contaminant. The criterion is the Maximum Contaminant Level developed under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) and the National Primary . Drinking Water Regulation (NPDWR). 44 K This criterion is based on a 304(a) aquatic life criterion that was issued in the 1995 Updates: Water Quality Criteria Documentsfor the Protection ofAquatic Life in Ambient Water, (EPA-820-B-96-001, September 1996). This value was derived using the GLI Guidelines (60FR 15393-15399, March 23, 1995; 40CFRI32 Appendix A); the difference between the 1985 Guidelines and the GLI Guidelines are explained on page iv of the 1995 Updates. None of the decisions concerning the derivation of this criterion were affected by any considerations'that are specific to the Great Lakes. L The CMC=1/[(f7/CMC 1) + (f2/CMC2)] where fl and f2 are the fractions of total selenium that are treated as selenite and selenate, respectively, and CMC 1 and CMC2 are 185.9 µg /1 and 12.82 ug /l, respectively. M This criterion applies to total PCBs, (e.g., the sum of all congener or all isomer or homolog or Aroclor analyses.) N The derivation of the CCC for this pollutant did not consider exposure through the diet, which is probably important for aquatic life occupying upper trophic levels. O This state criterion is also based on a. total fish consumption rate of 0.0175 kg/day. P This water quality criterion is expressed as Ecg free cyanide (as CN)/L. Q This value was announced (61 FR58444-58449, November 14, 1996) as a proposed GLI 303 I aquatic life. criterion R This water quality criterion for arsenic refers to the inorganic form only. S This water quality criterion for selenium is expressed in terms of total recoverable metal in the water column. It is scientifically acceptable to use the conversion factor (0.996 - CMC or 0.922- CCC) thatwas used in the GLI to convert this to a value that is expressed in terms of dissolved metal. T The organoleptic effect criterion is more stringent than the value for priority toxic pollutants. U This value was derived from data for heptachlor and the criteria document provides insufficient data to estimate the relative toxicities of heptachlor and heptachlor epoxide. V There is a full set of aquatic life toxicity data that show that DEHP is not toxic to aquatic organisms at or below its solubility limit. W This value was derived from data for endosulfan and is most appropriately applied to the sum of alpha-endosulfan and beta-endosulfan. X This criterion is based on a 304(a) aquatic life criterion issued in 1980 or 1986, and was issued in one of the following documents: Aldrin/Dieldrin (EPA440/5-80-019), Chlordane (EPA 440/5-80-027), DDT (EPA 440/5-80-038), Endrin (EPA 440/5-80-047), Heptachlor (EPA 440/5-80-052), Polychlorinated Biphenyls (EPA 440/5- 80-068), Toxaphene (EPA 440/5-86-006). This CCC is based on the Final Residue value procedure in the 1985 Guidelines. Since the publication of the Great Lakes Aquatic Life Criteria Guidelines in 1995 (60FR15393-15399, March 23, 1995), the EPA no longer uses the Final Residue value procedure for deriving CCCs for new or revised 304(a) aquatic life criteria. Y This water quality criterion is based on a 304(a) aquatic life criterion that was derived using the 1985 Guidelines (Guidelines for Deriving Numerical National Water Quality Criteria for the Protection ofAquatic Organisms and Their Uses, P1385-227049, January 1985) and was issued in one of the following criteria documents: Arsenic (EPA 440/5-84-033), Cadmium (EPA 440/5-84-032), Chromium (EPA 440/5-84-029), Copper (EPA 440/5-84-031), Cyanide (EPA 44015-84-028), Lead (EPA 440/5-84-027), Nickel (EPA 440/5-86-004), Pentachlorophenol (EPA 440/5-86-009), Toxaphene, (EPA 440/5-86-006), Zinc (EPA 440/5-87- 003). Z When the concentration of dissolved organic carbon is elevated, copper is substantially less toxic and use of Water -Effect Ratios might be appropriate. as The selenium criteria document (EPA 440/5-87-006, September 1987) provides that if selenium is as toxic to saltwater fishes in the field as it is to freshwater fishes in the field, the status of the fish community should be monitored whenever the concentration of selenium exceeds 5.0 µg/L in salt water because the saltwater CCC does not take into account uptake via the food chain. bb This water quality criterion was derived on page 43 of the mercury criteria document (EPA 440/5-84-026, January 1985). The saltwater CCC of 0.025 ug/L given on page 23 of the criteria document is based on the Final Residue value procedure in the 1985 Guidelines. Since the publication of the Great Lakes Aquatic Life criteria Guidelines in 1995 (60FR15393-15399, March 23, 1995), the EPA no longer uses the Final Residue value procedure for deriving CCCs for new or revised 304(a) aquatic life criteria. cc This water quality criterion was derived in Ambient Water Quality Criteria Saltwater CopperAddendum (Draft, April 14, 1995) and was promulgated in the Interim Final National Toxics Rule (60FR22228-222237, May 4, 1995). dd This water quality criterion was derived from data for inorganic mercury (II), but is applied here to total mercury. If a substantial portion of the mercury in the water column is methylmercury, this criterion will probably be under protective. In addition, even though inorganic mercury is converted to methylmercury and methylmercury bioaccumulates to a great extent, this criterion does not account for uptake via the food chain because sufficient data were not available when the criterion was derived. ee This criterion is a noncarcinogen. As prescribed in Section E of this regulation, application of this criterion for determining permit effluent limitations requires the use of 7Q10 or comparable tidal condition as determined by the Department. ff EPA is currently reassessing the criteria for arsenic. gg This criterion applies to DDT and its metabolites (i.e., the total concentration of DDT and its metabolites should not exceed this value). hh Although a new RfD is available in IRIS, the surface water criteria will not be revised until the National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule (Stage 2 DBPR) is completed, since public comment on the relative source contribution (RSC) for chloroform is anticipated. - ii Although EPA has not published a completed criteria document for phthalate, it is EPA's understanding that sufficient data exist to allow calculation of aquatic life criteria. 45 Attachment 1- Conversion Factors for Dissolved Metals Metal Conversion Factor freshwater CMC Conversion Factor freshwater CCC Conversion Factor, saltwater CMC Conversion Factor saltwater CCC Arsenic 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Cadmium 1.136672-[(In hardness)(0.041838)] 1.101672-[(ln hardness)(0.041838)] 0.994 0.994 Chromium III 0.316 0.860 -- -- Chromium VI 0.982 0.962 0.993 0.993 Copper 0.960 0.960 0.83 0.83 Lead 1.46203-[(In hardness)(0.145712)] 1.46203-[(ln hardness)(0.145712)] 0.951 0.951 Mercury 0.85 0.85 0.85 0.85 Nickel 0.998 0.997 0.990 0.990 Selenium -- -- 0.998 0.998 Silver 0.85 -- 0.85 -- Zinc 0.978 0.986 0.946 0.946 57 TEXTILE EFFLUENT LIMITS SPREADSHEET PERMIT NO: NC0004812 PERMITTEE: PHARR YARNS, INC. COUNTY: GASTON BASED ON 40CFR410.70 SUBPART G STOCK AND YARN FINISHING SUBCATEGORY PERMITTED FLOW: 0.5 MGD PRODUCTION DATA: DAILY MAX. 24000 according to EPA recommendation MONTHLY AVG. 24000 MUM 4Vl M 41U./U LUbFAKI U tdll IIRInS In lub/IUUU lust POLLUTANT DAILY MAX MONTHLY AVERAGE -�, BOD5 6.8 3.4 COD 84.6 42.3 S 17.4 8.7 Sulfide 0.24 0.12 Phenol 0.12 0.06 Total Chromium 0.12 0.06 pH must be between 6 and 9 at all times LIMITS 417.6 208.8 5.8 2.9 d 2.9 1.4 Chromium 2.9 1.4 must be between 6 and 9 at all times FOR PHARR YARNS, ONLY 279/o OF FLOW IS PROCESS FLOW ADJUST LIMITS ACCORDINGLY: VM1L1 PIMA 1'I VIYIIILI IfY BOOS 44.1 22.0 COD 548.2 274.1 TSS 112.8 56.4 Sulfide 5.8 2.9 Phenol 2.9 1.4 Total Chromium 2.9 1.4 pH must be between 6 and 9 at all times FINAL LIMITS i 181.0 113 849.6 475 249,f, (h'da 147 e• 5.8'•�j 2 DI 2.9 1 Chromium 2.9 1 DOMESTIC WASTE IS 73%, ADD AI LOCATION FOR THAT DAILY M LY AVERAGE rLLUTANT BODS 137.0 91.3 TSS 137. 991.3 GOD W1.3ti59 2UU.`Jlub original BOD limits were 390 lb/day (monthly ave) nd 780 Ib/day (daily max), so these limits are still rotective of DO t Cr�i2 �w„� ��o �ex�;�e m�1ls faVNf PT- VY�a x I 'I`I Ntck) A-tQ- Clow c�rom►%Aw, 7 I� '�s Cat Sc' -b �- m CO�rn w r to SID l 11 ) u 7. V I L, /.� f L k a," It11 c, 0,.f>1G,✓i1/zrc7S J2S u 4p� O-C tl" 7ou 3 _ �711 i✓r L D, gS� � O, 0 86 J�,f�L s J. a y s /, /��/ M4� � //g�%/ '�_ 67f 1 Gro z w 3 L o, 79y= o. dgx :r8 $° Date Flow MGD(lb/day) BOD COD (lb/clay) TSS (lb/day) pH (su) Jul-04 0.094 36.050 220.725 33.100 7.05 Aug-04 0.116 26.750 332.250 39.000 7.18 Sep-04 0.139 48.600 404.400 43.000 7.46 Oct-04 0.140 8.675 172.000 23.075 7.00 Nov-04 0.148 12.900 205.750 30.250 7.15 Dec-04 0.129 17.200 379.000 47.200 7.74 Jan-05 0.145 9.750 143.250 15.750 6.98 Feb-05 0.144 33.000 318.000 16.250 7.18 Mar-05 0.208 22.400. 438.800 124.800 7.24 Apr-05 0.184 27.660 287.750 66.000 7.40 May-05 0.169 44.000 496.500 65.250 7.28 Jun-05 0.234 75.600 449.200 88.400 6.76 Jul-05 0.213 27.530 206.145 61.555 7.30 Aug-05 0.248 51.000 330.000 65.600 6.94 Sep-05 0.214 37.050 213.750 27.500 7.03 Oct-05 0.177 25.250 176.000 16.750 7.08 Nov-05 0.155 30.400 170.600 15.400 7.40 Dec-05 0.180 31.750 308.500 24.750 7.40 Jan-06 0.200 27.250 195.000 16.500 6.70 Feb-06 0.157 13.750 217.000 14.750 6.78 Mar-06 0.147 12.600 124.800 26.600 7.00 Apr-06 0.207 49.500 352.750 28.000 7.28 May-06 0.175 30.600 330.600 47.000 6.68 Jun-06 0.164 17.750 119.500 23.000 6.78 Jul-06 0.133 6.175 85.500 12.425 6.78 Average 0.169 28.928 267.111 38.876 7.101 Maximum 0.248 75.600 496.500 124.800 7.740 Minimum 0.094 6.175 85.500 12.425 6.680 Date Flow (MGD) BOD m/I COD m/I TSS m/l Jul-04 0.094 45.98 281.55 42.22 Aug-04 0.116 27.63 343.24 40.29 Sep-04 0.139 41.81 347.92 36.99 Oct-04 0.140 7.41 146.94 19.71 Nov-04 0.148 10.47 166.92 24.54 Dec-04 0.129 15.98 352.19 43.86 Jan-05 0.145 8.09 118.80 13.06 Feb-05 0.144 27.44 264.45 13.51 Mar-05 0.208 12.92 253.07 71.98 Apr-05 0.184 18.07 188.02 43.13 May-05 0.169 31.16 351.59 46.21 Jun-05 0.234 38.82 230.64 45.39 Jul-05 0.213 15.52, 116.20 34.70 Aug-05 0.248 24.69 159.74 31.75 Sep-05 0.214 20.77 119.84 15.42 Oct-05 0.177 17.15 119.55 11.38 Nov-05 0.155 23.57 132.29 11.94 Dec-05 0.180 21.14 205.43 16.48 Jan-06 0.200 16.36 117.08 9.91 Feb-06 0.157 10.48 165.35 11.24 Mar-06 0.147 10.25 101.57 21.65 Apr-06. 0.207 28.71 204.63 16.24 May-06 0.175 20.99 226.77 32.24 Jun-06 0.164 13.00 87.53 16.85 Jul-06 0.133 5.57 77.06 11.20 Average 0.169 20.560 195.134 27.275 Maximum 0.248 45.984 352.189 71.976 Minimum 0.094 5.566 77.063 9.906 L, 61, � k. v` J (n ) = ao.sanyi� . is c 1 ¢r°'�o�, ao,J h/ Flow (MGD) 1 0.5 aquatic life (mg/1) at 0.5 MGD aquatic life (mg/1) at 1.0'MGD aquatic life (Ibs/d) at 0.5 MGD aquatic life (Ibs/d) at 1 MGD ELGs (Ibs/d) based on 24,000 Ibs/d monthly avq daily max monthly avq daily max monthly avq daily max monthly avq daily max monthly avg daily max total chromium* sulfide** phenol 7.554 11.216 3.829 5.685 31.519 46.800 31.953 _ 47.443 1.4 2.9 0.325 0.649 0.163 0.327 1.354 2.709 1.363 2.725 1.4 2.9 na na na na na na na na 1.4 2.9 * aquatic life based on chromium III standards **based on hydrogen sulfide previous permit Ibs/d monthly avg daily max 0.04 1.2 0.04 1.2 _ 0.04 1.2 Table 1. Project Information Facility Name WWTP .Grade NPDES Permit Outfall flow, Qw (MGD) Receiving Stream Stream Class ..7Q10s :(cfs) .7Q10w -(cfs) 3OQ2 (cfs) QA (cfs)• Time Period Data Source(s) Table 2. Parameters of Concern Name Type Chronic -Modifier: Acute PQL - Units :Par01 Sulfide . NC ' 0.002 mg/L- Par02 -'.`- .Chromium N.0 - , '0.05'. 1.022 mg%L; Pac03 - Fheriols " A 0001 N mg/L Par04 Par05 Par06 Par07 _ P'arO8 . »Y Par1b Par11 ; Par12 Par13 Par14 Par15 npdes rpa, input 10/18/2006 r REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS Pharr Yarns, Inc. NC0004812 Time -Period July 2004 - July 2006 Qw (MGD) 0.5 7Q10S (cfs) 125 7Q10W (cis) 228 30Q2 (cfs) 310 Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cfs) 808 Rec'ving Stream South Fork Catawba River WWTP Class IV IWC (%) @ 7Q10S 0.6162 @ 7Q10W 0.3388 @ 30Q2 0.2494 @ QA 0.0958 Stream Class WS-V Outfall 001 Qw = 0.5 MGD STANDARDS & PARAMETER TYPE CRITERIA (2) PQL Units REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS- RECOMMENDED ACTION lt) NCWQS/ Y,,FAIII n # Det. Mar Fred Cw Allowable Cw Chronic Acute Acute: N/A Sulfide NC 0.002 mg/L 108 13 26.5 _ _ _ _ _ Chronic 0.32 Weekly average limit of ug/I is recommended - 1/week monitoring is recommended:€ Acute: 1.02 Daily maximum limit of 1020 ug/I is recommended Chromium NC 0.1 1.022 mg/L 108 108 2.8 _ _ _ _ 1/week rnonitorj rlg is recommended`' _ �:' _ Chronic 8.11 Acute: N/A Phenols A 401 N mg/L 107 41 0.8 _ _ _� _ _ _ _ Chronic 0.40 Weekly average limit of 400 ug/I is recommerded 1/week monitoring is recommended:'_, ' Acute: N/A *Legend. " Freshwater Discharge C = Carcinogenic NC = Non -carcinogenic A =Aesthetic QS 1 C�IrDrn w ily\ L� C't CA'A ) I e I) npdes rpa, rpa 10/18/2006 1' REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS I Sulfide I Chromium I Date Data BDL-112DL Results Date Data BDL-112DL Results 1 Jul-04 < 0.04J" 0.0 Std Oev. 1.8102 1 Jul-04 0,003 0.0 Std Dev. 0.1632 2 Jul-04 < 0.3 Mean 1.2665 2 Jul-04 0.020 0.0 Mean 0.0961 3 Jul-04 < 0.9 C.V. 1.4293 3 Jul-04 0.040 0.0 C.V. 1.6990 4 Jul-04 < 1.0 n 108 4 Jul-04 0.134 0.1 n 108 5 Aug-04 < 0.5 5 Aug-04 0.135 0.1 6 Aug-04 < 0.2 Mult Factor = 1.8800 6 Aug-04 0.051 0.1 Mult Factor = 2.0100 7 Aug-04 < 0.3 Max. Value 14.1 rngA 7 Aug-04 0092 0.1 Max. Value 1.4 m1 8 Aug-04 < 0.4 Max. Pred Cw 26.5 mgA 8 Aug-04 0.073 0.1 Max. Prod Cw 2.8 mt 9 Sep-04 < 0.3 9 Sep-04 0.041 0.0 10 Sep-04 <'.. 0.9 10 Sep-04 0.285 0.3 11 Sep-04 < 3.60` 1.8 11 Sep-04 0.184 0.2 12 Sep-04 < 1.09 0.5 12 Sep-04 0.045 0.0 13 Sep-04 < 0.82 0.4 13 Sep-04 0.023 0.0 14 OCt-04 < 0.53 0.3 14 OCt-04 0,006 0.0 15 Oct-04 < 0,52 0.3 15 OCt-04 0.010 0.0 16 Oct-04 < 1.00 0.5 16 Oct-04 0.026 0.0 17 Oct-04 < 5.71 2.9 17 Oct-04 0.137 0.1 18 Nov-04 < 1.23 0.8 18 Nov-04 0.027 0.0 19 Nov-04 < 0,95 0.5 19 Nov-04 0.021 0.0 20 Nov-04 < 1.19 0.6 20 Nov-04 0.031 0.0 21 Nov-04 < 1.66 0.8 21 Nov-04 0.180 0.2 22 Dec-04 < 1.60 0.8 22 Dec-04 0.110 0.1 23 Dec-04 < 0.48 0.2 23 Dec-04 0.041 0.0 24 Dec-04 < 2A9 1.2 24 Deo04 0.280 0.3 25 Dec-04 < 2.88 1.4 25 Dec-04 0.448 0.4 26 Dec-04 < 0,68 0.3 26 Dec-04 0.019 0.0 27 Jan-05 < 2.00 1.0 27 Jan-05 0.038 0.0 28 Jan-05 < 2.10 1.0 28 Jan-05 0.019 0.0 29 Jan-05 < 1.14 0.6 29 Jan-05 0.011 0.0 30 Jan-05 < 1224 0.6 30 Jan-05 0.038 0.0 31 Feb-m < 4,85 ' 2.4 31 Feb-05 0.169 0.2 32 Feb-05 < 0.59 0.3 32 Feb-05 0.050 0.0 33 Feb-05 < 0.98 0.5 33 Feb-05 0.096 0.1 34 Feb-05 < 0.87 0.4 34 Feb-05 0.087 0.1 35 Mar-05 < 1.23 ;} 0.6 35 Mar-05 0.050 0.0 36 Mar-05 7.19 7.2 36 Mar-05 0.3D9 0.3 37 Mar-05 5A0 5.1 37 Mar-05 0.267 0.3 38 Mar-05 8,35 8.3 38 Mar-05 1.393 1.4 39 Mar-05 1408 14.1 39 Mar-05 0.224 0.2 40 Apr-05 < 1,00, 0.5 40 Apr-05 0.042 0.0 41 Apr-05 < 1,66 ] 0.8 41 Apr-05 0.063 0.1 42 Apr-05 2.00 2.0 42 Apr-05 0.224 0.2 43 Apr-05 3.04 3.0 43 Apr-05 0.116 0.1 44 May-05 < 1,34 j 0.7 44 May-05 0.026 0.0 45 May-05 < 6.37 3.2 45 May-05 0.787 0.8 46 May-05 < 4.94, 2.5 46 May-05 0.364 0.4 47 May-05 < 1.21 ') 0.6 47 May-05 0.123 0.1 48 Jun-05 < 1,58 n 0.8 48 Jun-05 0.120 0.1 49 Jun-05 < 2.41 ' 1.2 49 Jun-05 0.058 0.1 50 Jun-05 < 0.28 f9 0.1 50 Jun-05 0.009 0.0 51 Jun-05 < 1.35 0.7 51 Jun-05 0,125 0.1 52 Jun-05 < 3.21 -- 1.6 52 Jun-05 0,148 0.1 53 Jul-05 < 0.01 ' 0.0 53 Jul-05 0.000 0.0 54 Jul-05 < 0.03 i 0.0 54 Jul-05 0.088 0.1 55 Jul-05 0.03 0.0 55 Jul-05 0.017 0.0 56 Jul-05 < 1.58 i 0.8 56 Jul-05 0.057 0.1 57 Aug-05 < 0.55 0.3 57 Aug-05 0.023 0.0 58 Aug-05 < 0.85 " 0.4 58 Aug 05 0.044 0.0 59 Aug-05 < 1.02 ; 0.5 59 Aug-05 0.070 0.1 60 Aug-05 5.81 5.8 60 Au05 0.144 0.1 61 Aug-05 1.12 1.1 61 Aug-05 0.028 0.0 62 Sep-05 0.76 0.8 62 Sep-05 0.020 0.0 63 Sep-05 2.10 2.1 63 Sep 05 0.058 0.1 64 Sep-05 < 1.28! 0.6 64 Sep-05 0.082 0.1 65 Sep-05 < 1.64 y 0.8 65 Sep-05 0.055 0.1 66 Oct-05 < 0.99 ,_ 0.5 66 Oct-05 0.034 0.0 67 Oct-05 < 1,82 . 0.9 67 Oct-05 0,106 0.1 68 Oct-05 < 0.53 0.3 68 Oct-05 0.020 0.0 69 Oct-05 < 1.05 0.5 69 Oct-05 0.063 0.1 70 Nov-05 < 0,61„ t 0.3 70 Nov-05 0.022 0.0 npdes rpa, data -1 - 10/18/2006 REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 Nov-05 Nov-05 Nov-05 Nov-05 Dec 05 Dec-05 Dec05 Dec-05 Jan-06 Jan-06 Jan-06 Jan-06 Feb-08 Feb-06 Feb-06 Feb-06 Mar-06 Mar-06 Mar-06 Mar-06 Mar-06 Apr-06 Apr-06 Apr-06 Apr-06 May-08 May-06 May-06 May-06 May-06 Jun-06 Jun-06 Jun-06 Jun-06 Jul-06 Jul-06 Jul-06 Jul-06 0.2 71 Nov-05 0.028 0.0 0.5 72 Nov-05 0,024 0.0 0.9 73 Nov-05 0,072 0.1 0.9 74 Nov-05 0,074 0.1 0.4 75 Dec-05 0.078 0.1 2.9 76 Dec-05 0.116 0.1 0.4 77 Dec-05 0.102 0.1 0.4 78 Dec-05 0,029 0.0 1.8 79 Jan-06 0.022 0.0 3.9 80 Jan-06 0.181 0.2 0.8 81 Jan-06 0.081 0.1 1.0 82 Jan-06 0.049 0.0 1.1 83 Feb-06 0.060 0.1 1.6 84 Feb-06 0.055 0.1 1.5 85 Feb-06 0.060 0.1 1.0 86 Feb-06 0.043 0.0 1.2 87 Mar-06 0.056 0.1 0.7 88 Mar-06 0.033 0.0 0.9 89 Mar-06 0.063 0.1 1.1 90 Mar-06 0.061 0.1 0.8 91 Mar-06 0.022 0.0 0.9 ' 92 Apr 06 0.030 0.0 1.0 93 Apr-06 0.071 0.1 1.7 94 Apr-06 0.099 0.1 1.8 95 Apr-06 0.117 0.1 1.1 96 May-06 0.006 0.0 1.0 97 May-06 0.082 0.1 0.8 98 May-06 0.038 0.0 0.9 99 May-06 0.025 0.0 0.9 100 May-06 0.107 0.1 0.8 101 Jun-06 0.018 0.0 1.8 102 Jun-06 0.025 0.0 0.8 103 Jun-06 0.024 0.0 1.0 104 Jun-06 0.023 0.0 0.2 106 Jul-06 0,002 0.0 1.3 106 Jul-06 0,032 0.0 0.9 107 Jul-06 0.015 0.0 2.0 108 Jul-06 (1041 0.0 109 _2_ npdes rpa, data 10/18/2D06 REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS Date Data BDL-12DL Results Jul-04 0.01 0.0 Std Dev. 0.0411 Jul-04 0.10 0.1 Mean 0.0221 Jul-04 0.02 0.0 C.V. 1,8556 Jul-04 0.39 0.4 n 107 Aug-04 0.01 0.0 Aug-04 0.01 0.0 Mult Factor = 2.0800 Aug-04 0.01 0.0 Max. Value 0.4 mg/L Aug-04 0.01 0.0 Max. Fred Cw 0.8 mg/L Sep-04 0.01 0.01 Sep-04 0.02 0.02 Sep-04 0.04 0.04 Sep-04 0.01 0.01 Sep-04 0,01 0.01 Oct-04 < 0.01 0.00 Oct-04 < 0.01 0.00 Ott-04 < 0.01 0.01 Oct-04 < 0.06 0.03 Nov-04 < 0.01 0.01 Nov-04 < 0.01 0.00 Nov-04 < 0.01 0.01 Nov-04 <. 0.02 0.01 Dec-04 0.03 0.03 Dec-04 0.01 0.01 Dec-04 < 0.03 0.02 De 04 < 0.03 0.02 Dec-04 0.02 0.02 Jan-05 0.03 0.03 Jan-05 0.05 0.05 Jan-05 0.02 0.02 Jan-05 0.03 0.03 Feb-05 0.05 0.05 Feb-05 0.01 0.01 Feb-05 < 0.02 0.01 Feb-05 0.01 0.01 Mar-05 < 0.01 0.01 Mar-05 < 0.03 0.01 Mar-05 < 0.04 0.02 Mar-05 0.06 0.06 Mar-05 < 0.06 0.03 Apr-05 < 0.01 0.01 Apr-05 < 0.02 0.01 Apr-05 0.02 0.02 Apr-05 < 0.02 0.01 May-05 < 0.01 0.01 May-05 < 0.06 0.03 May-05 < 0.05 0.02 May-05 < 0.01 0.01 Jun-05 < 0.02 0.01 Jun-05 0.03 0.03 Jun-05 Jun-05 0.01 0.01 Jun-05 < 0.03 0.02 Jul-05 0.00 0.00 Jul-05 0.02 0.02 Jul-05 < 0.01 0.01 Jul-05 < 0.01 0.01 Aug-05 < 0.01 0.00 Aug-05 0.01 0.01 Aug-05 0.02 0.02 Aug-05 < 0.03 0.01 Aug-05 < 0.01 0.00 Sep-05 < 0.01 0.00 Sep-05 < 0.02 0.01 Sep-05 < 0.01 0.01 Sep-05 < 0.02 0.01 Oct-05 < 0.01 0.00 Ott-05 < 0.02 0.01 Oct-05 < 0.01 0.00 Oct-05 < 0.01 0.01 Nov-05 < 0.01 0.00 npdes rpa, data - 3 - 10/18/2006 REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS 71 Nov-05 < 0.00 0.00 72 Nov-05 < 0,01 0.00 73 Nov-05 0,02 0.02 74 Nov-05 < 0.02 0.01 75 Dec-05 0,01 0.01 76 Dec-05 0.02 0.02 77 Deo-05 004 0.04 78 Dec-05 0.01 0.01 79 Jan-06 < 0.04 0.02 80 Jan-06 < 0.04 0.02 81 Jan-06 < 0.02 0.01 82 Jan-06 < 0.01 0.01 83 Feb-06 0.02 0.02 84 Feb-06 < 0.01 0.01 85 Feb-06 0,07 0.07 86 Feb-06 0.09 0.09 87 Mar-06 < 0,01 0.01 88 Mar-06 < 0,01 0.00 89 Mar-06 < 0.01 0.00 90 Mar-06 < 0,01 0.01 91 Mar-06 < 0.04 0.02 92 Apr-06 0.05 0.05 93 Apr-06 0.10 0.10 94 Apr-06 < 0.09 0.04 95 Apr-06 < 0.09 0.04 96 May-06 < 0,01 0.00 97 May-06 < 0,00 0.00 98 May-06 < 0.04 0.02 99 May-06 < 0,05 0.02 100 May-06 < 0.04 0.02 101 Jun-06 < 0,04 0.02 102 Jun-06 < 0.08 0.04 103 Jun-06 < 0.04 0.02 104 Jun-06 < 0.05 0.03 105 Jul-06 < 0.01 0.00 106 Jul-06 < 0.00 0.00 107 Jul-06 < 0.04 0.02 108 Jul-06 < 0.10 0.05 npdes rpa, data -4- 10/18/2006 Table 1. Project Information -- Facility Name WWTP Grade NPDES Permit Outfall Flow, Qw (MGD) Receiving Stream Stream Class 7Q10s (cfs) 7Q10w (cfs) 30Q2 (cfs) QA (cfs) Time Period Data Source(s)- Table 2.. Parameters of Concern Name - . Type Chronic- Modifier • Acute - PQL : Units Par01 Sulfide. ' N'C 0.002, g Par02 Chromium NQ 0.05 1.022 mg/L Par03 Phenols A• 0.001 N Mg/L Par05 .. Par06 Par07 P}ar08 Pa r09 = . Par10 Par1,1 _ u. P'ar12 . Par13 Par14 npdes rpa-1 MGD Floow, input 10/18/2006 REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS Pharr Yarns, Inc. NC0004812 Time Period July 2004 - July 2006 Qw (MGD) 1 7Q10S (cfs) 125 7Q10W (cfs) 228 30Q2 (cfs) 310 Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cfs) 808 Rec'ving Stream South Fork Catawba River WWTP Class N IWC (%) @ 7Q10S 1.2248 @ 7Q10W 0.6752 @ 30Q2 0.4975 @ QA 0.1915 Stream Class WS-V Outfall 001 QW = 1 MGD STANDARDS & PARAMETER TYPE CRITERIA (2) PQL Units REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS RECOMMENDED ACTION NCWQS/ %FAV/ n #Det Max FredCw AllowableCw (t) Chronic Acute Acute: N/A Sulfide NC 0.002 mg/L 108 13 26.5 _ _ _-_ _ Chronic 0.16 _ _ _ _ _ _ __- Weekly average limit of 160 ug/I 1s'rgcommended. 1/week monitoring is recommended.'' Acute: 1.02 Daily maximum limit of 1020 ug/I is. recommended. Chromium NC 0.1 1.022 mg/L 108 108 2.8 _ _ _ _ - 1/week monitoring is recommended. ---` - — - — — ---.--------------- _ Chronic 4- Acute: N/A Phenols A 0"CM N mg/L 107 41 0.8 _---- _ -- _ — - — _-- Chronic: 0.20 -- _+_---___ - Weekly average limit of 200 ugn'is recommended. 1/week monitoring isrecommended, ' Acute: N/A ; Legend. " Freshwater Discharge C = Carcinogenic NC = Non -carcinogenic A = Aesthetic W QS 1b�aH� npdes rpa-1MGD Floow, rpa 10/18/2006 REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS Sulfide Chromium Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results Date Data BDL=1/2DL Results 1 Jul-04 < 0,04 `" 0.0 Std Dev. 1.8102 1 Jul-04 '. 0.003 0.0 Std Dev. 0.1632 2 Jul-04 < 0,55 0.3 Mean 1.2665 2 Jul-04 0.020 0.0 Mean 0.0961 3 Jul-04 < 1.81 0.9 C.V. 1.4293 3 Jul-04 0.040 0.0 C.V. 1.8990 4 Jul-04 < 2,09 1.0 n 108 4 Jul-04 0.134 0.1 n 108 5 Aug-04 < 0.95 0.5 5 Aug-04 0.135 0.1 6 Aug-04 < 0.44 -: 0.2 Mult Factor = 1.8800 6 Aug-04 0.051 0.1 Mult Factor = 2.0100 7 Aug-04 < 0.64 0.3 Max. Value 14.1 rngfl. 7 Aug-04 0.092 0.1 Max. Value 1.4 m 8 Aug-04 < 0.82 0.4 Max. Pred Garr 26.5 rng1. 8 Aug-04 0.073 0.1 Max. Pred Cw 2.8 m 9 Sep-04 < 0.3 9 Sep-04 0.041 0.0 10 Sep-04=' 0.9 10 Sep-04 0.265 0.3 11 Sep-04 1.8 11 Sep-04 0.184 0.2 12 Sep-04 0.5 12 Sep-04 0.045 0.0 13 Sep-04 0.4 13 Sep-04 0.023 0.0 14 Oct-04 0.3 14 Oct-04 0.006 0.0 15 Oct-04 a 0.3 15 00t-04 0.010 0.0 16 Oct-04 < 0.5 16 00t-04 0.026 0.0 17 Oct-04 < 2.9 17 Oct-04 0.137 0.1 18 Nov-04 < "` 0.6 18 Nov-04 0.027 0.0 19 Nov-04 < 0.95j" 0.5 19 Nov-04 0.021 0.0 20 Nov-04 < 1.19 0.6 20 Nov-04 0.031 0.0 21 Nov-04 < 1.66 0.8 21 Nov-04 0,180 0.2 22 Dec-04 < 1.60 0.8 22 Dec-04 0,110 0.1 23 Dec-04 < 0.48 0.2 23 Dec-04 0.041 0.0 24 Dec-04 < 249 1.2 24 DeC-04 0.280 0.3 25 Dec-04 < 2.88 1.4 25 DeC-04 0.448 0.4 26 Dec-04 < 0,88 0.3 26 Deo-04 0.019 0.0 27 Jan-05 < 2,00 1.0 27 Jan-05 0.038 0.0 28 Jan-05 < 2.10 1.0 28 Jan-05 0.019 0.0 29 Jan-05 < 1A4 0.6 29 Jan-05 0.011 0.0 30 Jan-05 < 1.22 0.6 30 Jan-05 0.038 0.0 31 Feb-05 < 4.85 2.4 31 Feb-05 0.169 0.2 32 Feb-05 < 0,59 0.3 32 Feb-05 0,050 0.0 33 Feb-05 < 0.5 33 Feb-05 0.096 0.1 34 Feb-05 " " 0.4 34 Feb-05 0.067 0.1 35 Mar-05 0.6 35 Mar-05 0.050 0.0 36 Mar-05 7.19 7.2 36 Mar-05 0.309 0.3 37 Mar-05 5.10 5.1 37 Mar-05 0.287 0.3 38 Mar-05 8.35 8.3 38 Mar-05 1.393 1.4 39 Mar-05 14.08 14.1 39 Mar-05 : 0.224 0.2 40 Apr-05 0.5 40 Apr-05 0.042 0.0 41 Apr-05 0.8 41 Apr-05 0,063 0.1 42 Apr-05 200 2.0 42 Apr-05 0.224 0.2 43 Apr-05 3.04 3.0 43 Apr-05 0.116 0.1 44 May-05 < - 1,34 -.', 0.7 44 May105 0.026 0.0 45 `" May-05 i .37 3.2 45 May-05 r 0.787 0.8 46 May-05 ,1 2.6 46 May-05 0.364 0.4 47 May-O 0.8 47 May-05 0.123 0.1 48 Jun-05 0.8 48 Jun-05 0.120 0.1 49 Jun-05 1.2 49 Jun-05 0.058 0.1 50 Jun-05 < 0. 0.1 50 Jun-05 0.009 0.0 51 Jun-05 < 1.35 <1 0.7 51 Jun-05 0.125 0.1 52 Jun-05 < 3,21 ''. 1.6 52 Jun-05 0.148 0.1 53 Jul-05 < 0.01 0.0 53 Jul-05 0.000 0.0 54 Jul-05 < 003 '; 0.0 54 Jul-05 0.088 0.1 55 Jul-05 0.03 0.0 55 Jul-05 0.017 0.0 56 Jul-05 < 1,58 0.8 56 Jul-05 0.057 0.1 57 Aug-05 < 0.55 0.3 57 Aug-05 0.023 0.0 58 Aug-05 < 0.85 0.4 58 Aug-05 0.D44 0.0 59 Aug-05 < 1,02; 0.5 59 Aug-05 0.070 0.1 60 Aug-05 5.81 5.8 60 Aug-05 0.144 0.1 61 Aug-05 1.12 1.1 61 Aug-05 0.028 0.0 62 Sep-05 0.76 0.8 62 Sep-05 0.020 0.0 63 Sep-05 2.10 2.1 63 Sep-05 0.0m 0.1 64 Sep-05 < 1.28" 0.6 64 Sep-05 0.082 0.1 65 Sep-05 < 1,64 { 0.8 65 Sep-05 0.055 0.1 66 Oct-05 < 0,99 0.5 66 Oct-05 0.034 0.0 67 Oct-05 < 1,82 0.9 67 Oct-05 0.106 0.1 68 Oct-05 < 0,53 0.3 68 Oct-05 0.020 0.0 69 Oct-05 < 1,05 0.5 69 Oct-05 0.063 0.1 70 Nov-05 < 0,61 j 0.3 701 Nov-05 0.022 0.0 npdes rpa-1MGD Floow, data - 1 - 10/18/2006 REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS 71 Nov-05 < 0.48 0.2 71 Nov-05 0.028 0.0 72 Nov-05 < 0.96 0.5 72 Nov-05 0.024 0.0 73 Nov-05 < 1.89 0.9 73 Nov-05 0.072 0.1 74 Nov-05 < 1.76 0.9 74 Nov-05 0,074 0.1 75 Deo-05 < 0.74 0.4 75 Dec-05 0,078 0.1 76 Deo-05 2.87 2.9 76 Dec-05 0.116 0.1 77 Dec-05 < 0,89 ' 0.4 77 Dec-05 0.102 0.1 78 Dm-05 < 0.83 0.4 78 DeC-05 0.029 0.0 79 Jan-06 < 3.66 1.8 79 Jan-06 0.022 0.0 80 Jan-06 3.88 3.9 80 Jan-06 0.181 0.2 81 Jan-06 < 1.68 0.8 81 Jan-06 0.081 0.1 82 Jan-06 < 1.97 1.0 82 Jan-06 0.049 0.0 83 Feb-06 < 2.24 1.1 83 Feb-06 0.060 0.1 84 Feb-06 < 2.94 1.5 84 Feb-06 0.055 0.1 85 Feb-06 < 294 1.5 85 Feb-06 0.060 0.1 86 Feb-06 < 2.02 1.0 86 Feb-06 0.043 0.0 87 Mar-06 < 2.43 1.2 87 Mar-06 0.056 0.1 88 Mar-06 < 1.49 0.7 88 Mar-06 0.033 0.0 89 Mar-06 < 1.82 0.9 89 Mar-06 0.06.3 0.1 90 Mar-06 < 2.30 1.1 90 Mar-06 0.061 0.1 91 Mar-06 < 1.56 0.8 91 Mar-06 0.022 0.0 92 Apr-06 < 1.88 0.9 92 Apr-06 0.030 0.0 93 Apr-06 < 1.91 1.0 93 Apr-06 0.071 0.1 94 Apr-06 < 3.48 1.7 94 Apr-06 0.099 0.1 95 Apr-06 < 3.60 1.8 95 Apr-06 0.117 0.1 96 May-06 < 2 1.1 96 May-06 0.006 0.0 97 May-06 < `: 1.0 97 May-06 0,082 0.1 98 May-06 < `" 0.8 98 May-06 0.038 0.0 99 May-06 < 0.9 99 May 06 0.025 0.0 100 May-06 < 0.9 100 May-06 0.107 0.1 101 Jun-06 < I';^s: 0.8 101 Jun-06 0.016 0.0 102 Jun-06 < 3. 1.8 102 Jun-06 0.025 0.0 103 Jun-06 < 1.55 0.8 103 Jun-06 0,024 0.0 104 Jun.06 < 2,05 1.0 104 Jun-06 0.023 0.0 105 Jul-06 < 0.40 ; 0.2 105 Jul-06 0.002 0.0 106 Jul-06 < 2.69 '. 1.3 106 Jul-06 0.032 0.0 107 Jul-06 < 1.72 0.9 107 Jul-06 0.015 0.0 108 Jul-06 < 4.09 '.. 2.0 108 Jul-06 1 o.041 0.0 109 109 npdes rpa-1MGD Floow, data - 2 - 10/18/2006 REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS Date Data BDL=IPIDL Results Jul-04 0.01 0.0 Std Dev. 0.0411 JUI-04 0.10 0.1 Mean 0.0221 Jul-04 0.02 0.0 C.V. 1.8556 Jul-04 0.39 0.4 n 107 Aug-04 0.01 0.0 Aug-04 0.01 0.0 Mu6 Factor = 2,0800 Aug-04 0.01 0.0 Max. Value 0.4 mg/L Aug-04 0.01 0.0 Max. Pred Cw 0.8 mg/L Sep-04 0.01 0.01 Sep-04 0.02 0.02 Sep-04 0.04 0.04 Sep-04 0.01 0.01 Sep-04 0.01 0.01 Oct-04 < 0.01 0.00 Oct-04 < 0.01 0.00 Oct-04 < 0.01 0.01 Oct-04 < 0.06 0.03 Nov-04 < 0.01 0.01 Nov-04 < 0.01 0.00 Nov-04 < 0.01 0.01 Nov-04 < 0.02 0.01 Deo04 0.03 0.03 Dec04 0.01 0.01 Dec-04 < 0.03 0.02 Dec-04 < 0.03 0.02 Deo04 0.02 0.02 Jan-05 0.03 0.03 Jan-05 0.05 0.05 Jan-05 0.02 0.02 Jan-05 0.03 0.03 Feb-05 0.05 0.05 Feb-05 0.01 0.01 Feb-05 < 0.02 0.01 Feb-05 0.01 0.01 Mar-05 < 0.01 0.01 Mar-05 < 0.03 0.01 Mar-05 < 0.04 0.02 Mar-05 0.06 0.06 Mar-05 < 0.05 0.03 Apr-05 < 0.01 0.01 Apr-05 < 0.02 0.01 Apr-05 0.02 0.02 Apr-05 < 0.02 0.01 May-05 < 0.01 0.01 May-05 < 0.06 0.03 May-05 < 0.05 0.02 May-05 < 0.01 0.01 Jun-05 < 0.02 0.01 Jun-05 0.03 0.03 Jun-05 Jun-05 0.01 0.01 Jun-05 < 0.03 0.02 Jul-05 0.00 0.00 Jul-05 0.02 0.02 Jul-05 < 0.01 0.01 Jul-05 < 0.01 0.01 Aug-05 < 0.01 0.00 Aug-05 0.01 0.01 Aug-05 0.02 0.02 Aug-05 < 0.03 0.01 Aug-05 < 0.01 0.00 Sep-05 < 0.01 0.00 Sep-05 < 0.02 0.01 Sep-05 < 0.01 0.01 Sep-05 < 0.02 0.01 Oct-05 < 0.01 0.00 Oct-05 < 0.02 0.01 Oct-05 < 0.01 0.00 Oct-05 < 0.01 0.01 Nov-05 < 0.01 0.00 npdes rpa-1 MGD Floow, data - 3 - 10/18/2006 REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS 71 Nov-05 < 0.00 0.00 72 Nov-05 < 0.01 0.00 73 Nov-05 0.02 0.02 74 Nov-05 < 0.02 0.01 75 De 05 0.01 0.01 76 Dec-05 0.02 0.02 77 Dec-05 0.04 0.04 78 Dec-05 0.01 0.01 79 Jan-06 < 0.04 0.02 80 Jan-06 < 0.04 0.02 81 Jan-06 < 0.02 0.01 82 Jan-06 < 0.01 0.01 83 Feb-06 0.02 0.02 84 Feb-06 < 0.01 0.01 85 Feb-06 0.07 0.07 86 Feb-06 0.09 0.09 87 Mar-06 < 0.01 0.01 88 Mar-06 < 0.01 0.00 89 Mar-06 < 0.01 0.00 90 Mar-06 < 0.01 0.01 91 Mar-06 < 0.04 0.02 92 Apr-06 0.05 0.05 93 Apr-06 0.10 0.10 94 Apr-06 < 0.09 0.04 95 Apr-06 < 0.09 0.04 96 May-06 < 0.01 0.00 97 May-06 < 0.00 0.00 98 May-06 < 0.04 0.02 99 May-06 < 0.05 0.02 100 May-06 < 0.04 0.02 101 Jun-06 < 0.04 0.02 102 Jun-06 < 0.08 0.04 103 Jun-06 < 0.04 0.02 104 Jun-06 < 0.05 0.03 105 Jul-06 < 0.01 0.00 106 Jul-06 < 0.00 0.00 107 Jul-06 < 0.04 0.02 108 Jul-06 < 0.10 0.05 npdes rpa-1 MGD Flo , data - 4 - 10/18/2006 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY „ 1 �� A >W REGION 4 Vl ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER 1+ ;M o= 61 FORSYTH STREET V, 144 PmotE` ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960 r,rli 1 9 2006 ;t Ms. Jackie Nowell North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality NPDES Unit 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 SUBJ: Draft NPDES Permit Modification Pharr Yarns WWTP - Permit No. NC0004812 Dear Ms. Nowell: In accordance with the EPA/NCDENR NPDES MOA, we have completed review of the draft permit modification specified above and have no comments or objections to its conditions. We request that we be afforded an additional review opportunity only if significant changes are made to the draft permit modification prior to issuance or if significant comments objecting to it are received. Otherwise, please send us one copy of the final permit modification when issued. If you have any questions, please call me at (404) 562-9304. Sincerely, Marshall Hyatt, Environmental Scientist Permits, Grants, and Technical Assistance Branch Water Management Division Internet Address (URL) • http://www.spa.gov Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable 00 Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 30 % Postconsumen APR 13 2006 16:05 FR CLT OBSERVER AD 70435e5340 TO 919197330719827i3 P.01i01 I o r° FrD r is4e4 Ville (ffi S al;; 5688843 SAT 04/15 TGic�rrlc yo � � 0 CP6 2.00X 3.14 PUBLIC STATE OF NORTHTim CAROLINA ENVIRONMENTAL, MANAGEMENT COMMISSION/NPDES UNIT 1617 MAIL,SERVICE CENTER NOTIFICATIONHOF LATENT TO ISSUE A NPDES WASTEWATER PERMIT On the basis cf thorough staff review and application of NC General Statute 143.21, Public Law 92-500 and other lawful standards and reg- ulations, the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission proposes to issue a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) wastewater discharge permit to the person(s) listed below effective 45 days from the publish date of this notice. Written comments regarding the proposed permit will be accepted until 30 days after the publish date of this notice. All comments received prior to that date are considered in the final determinations regarding the proposed permit. The Director of the NC Division of Waste Water Quality may decide to hold a public meeting for the pro- posed permit should the Division receive a significant degree of pub lic interest. Copies of the draft permit and other supporting information on file used to determine conditions present in the draft permit are available upon request and payment of the costs of reproduction. Mail com- ments and/or requests for information to the NC Division of Water Oualiry at the above address or call Ms. Carolyn Bryant (919) 733- .5083, extension 383 or Ms. Frances Calendaria (919) 733-5083, eaten sion 520 at the Point Source Branchmit. Please include the NPDES per- ersons ma also visit the Division numbr (attached) Hof Water Quality n any tacn. Interet 512 N. StedS l sbury Street Raleigh, NC 27604-1148 between the hours of 6:00 a.m, and 5:00 p.m. to review information on file. Pharr Yarns (100 Main. Street, McAdenville, NC 26101) has applied for a modification of NPDES permit NC0004812 for the Pharr Yarns WWTP in Gaston. This permitted facility discharges treated waste- water to the South Fork Catawba River in the Catawba River Basin. Currently BOD, TSS, COD, sulfide, toter nitrogen, total phosphorus and total residual chlorine are water quality limited. This discharge may affect future allocations in this portion of the Catawba River Basin. LP568B843 44 Lines PsPC,. Properties Subsidiary Publications ClassifirN Ir NCDENR/DWQ/NPDES A D N U M B E R 5688843 R U N D A T F ** TOTAL PAGE.01 ** PUBLIC NOTICE " STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA� ENVIRONMENTA MAN- AGEMENT' COM SIONI 1617 MAIL :,SER CE CENTER'. ;• , 'RALEIGM, OC 27699-1617 AFFIDAVIT OF INSERTION OF- TENT -TO 4- SU IN - A TENT; '•TOISSUE •A NPDES ADVERTISEMENT .,WASTEWATER ,PERMIT,',-• On the basis of thorough The Gaston Gazette staff review and application Statute of. NC . General, 143.21, Public law 92-500 and other lawful standards and regulations, the North Carolina Environmental management : Commission proposes to -issue a nation- al.. Pollutant- Discharge Gastonia, NC Elimination: System (NPDES) wastewater dis- Gaston County charge,' permit, ,to..th6 per- ;sons(s)',Iisted'Below effea- five 45; days' from the.pub- I, Melissa Birchfield Legal Advertising Clerk of the The Gaston Gazette, do certify th; lish date,of;this notice: the advertisement of the Written comments: regard - the;proposed permit will PUBLIC NOTICE 'be - accepted :until':3o days after the publlsh,date of this NOTIFICATION OF INTENT TO ISSUE A NPDES notice."All 4gimmentsre- ceived..pnor tcf that date are WASTEWATER PERMIT considered in the final de- terminabons" regarding the proposed , permit. The, Di- rector of the NC Division of Water, Quality may decide to hold a public'meeting for Measuring 10.35 inches appeared in The Gaston Gazette, newspaper published in Gast the proposed permit Should County, Gastonia, NC, In issuesthe Division receive a sig- nificant degree` of publib in-' terest.'+ Copies, of'the'Araft''permit and other•: supporting. infor- APRIL 14 2006 mation"orr file.:used'to: de- termine conditions'present in the draft -permit are avail- able Upon:re9uest and•pay-: meet of the costs of repro- ductldk. Mail' comments ? 1 anrequa�sts, for infor- mation foafV -e C Division Me issa Birchfield of. Water .Quality, ;at . the above'.address'or call the Leaa dvertisinQ Clerk Point Source : Branch : at (919) 733-5083,. extension f 520. Please • include the NPDES_, permit Sworn to' and subscribed before me this day o 20C _number in any bom- ,(NC0004812). munication.:Interested per, sons, may, alspAit,the: Di= Waibuii. Str at vi12 N -f, 512, :N,;.Salis6ury.• Street; 1 Raleigh,,,, Nc,;;,27604-1'148 between the hours of 8;00. Carla Norris Potter, Notary Public :a.m. and 5:06 p.m. to. re= view.information,on file.,;. My Commission Expires September 14, 2008 :. 'Pharir` :Yarlis:," F(100-` Main Street ',tutcAdenvil1% N.C' 28101)` has:14pplied for a modification, of. NPDES per; �f'�,j/f(/ and NC0004812,' for the Pharr Yarns WWtP `•in Gaston. Phis perrhitted.facil- ity 'discharges.,, -treated wastewater.. to . the South ForkCatawba.)River in the Catawba; River,Basin: Cur• rentiyi.'BbD;':TSS" COD, sulfide, total.pitrogen,.,tota phosphorus, arld total resid- uat.chbdne' are water Aual• "discharge ity, limited. This may affect future allooa• tions in this portion of the Catawba River Basin. 1C-April 14,:2006 ' �4 U - we-,W/W/*US r �/E �vv�►� �tEli�/t U �.�,y ScDff.�Z Flow (MGD) 1 0.5 aquatic life (mg/1) at 0.5 MGD aquatic life (mg/1) at 1.0 MGD I aquatic life lbs/d at 0.5 MGD aquatic life lbs/d at 1 MGD mnnthht min HAW max mnnthiv nva daily max I monthly avo daily max monthly avg daily max total chromium* sulfide** phenol 7.554 11.216 3.829 5.685 31.519 46.800 31.953 47.443 0.325 0.649 0.163 0.327 1.354 2.709 1.363 2.725 na na na na na na na na * aquatic life based on chromium III standards **based on hydrogen sulfide ELGs Ibs/d based on 24,000 Ibs/d I xevious permit (Ibs/d) monthiv avq dailV max ImonthlVavg dail max 1.4 2.9 9 0 1.4 2. 1.2 1.4 2.9 P44 Atl 1.2 o, y 4 z, n,$_ 23J J O,Y_ 1,Z,IIi® .Cirs <. w� .217 4f/e Alf Ile !/L ✓ /tv .0ow y lam-/1 7 /� �%✓G s�� �,✓c�, W P k. Zoo a 7r�'; C,14s Nltl"L Sao ^ &AIV 6 ��.� 4i ,,7d, DAILY AVERAGES Date Flow MGD(lb/day) BOD COD (lb/day) TSS (lb/day) pH (su) Sulfide (lb/day.).(lb/day) Phenol Chromium (lb/day) Jul-04 0.289 4.2 34.9 1.4 7.3 0.1 0.001 0.0084 Jul-04 0.247 18. 216. 66. 7.1 1.13 0.02 0.041 Jul-04 0.106 80. 375. 50. 6.9 1.6 0.016 0.035 Jul-04 0.085 42. 257. 15. 6.9 1.48 0.028 0:095 Aug-04 0.139 31.' 413. 35. 7.1 1.1 0.011 0.157 Aug-04 0.192 22. 263. 19. 6.5 0.7 0.007 0.081 Aug-04 0.224 38. 403. 60. 7.5 1.2 0.012 0.172 Aug-04 0.161 16. 250. 42. 7.6 1.1 0.011 0.098 Sep-04 0.279 24. 230. 40. 7.4 1.48, 0.016 0.096 Sep-04' 0.082 43. 459. 126. 7.6 1.25 0.013 0.181 Sep-04 0.047 107. 599. 27. 7.6 1.41 0.014 0.072 Sep-04 0.225 33. 486. 14. 7.6 2.04 0.02 0.084 Sep-04 0.161 36. 248. 8. 7.1 1.1 0.017 0.031 Oct-04 0.147 1.2 126. 5.2 7.2 0.65 0.007 0.007 Oct-04 0.176 3. 120. al 7.2 0.76 0.008 0.015 Oct-04 0.142 3.5 136. 15. 6.9 1.18 0.012 0.031 Oct-04 0.055 21. 306. 63. 6.7 2.62 0.026 0.063 Nov-04 0.084 &1 78. 11. 7. 0.86 0.009 0.019 Nov-04 0.171 9.5 197. 19. 7. 1.35 0.014 0.03 Nov-04 0.135 4. 150. 12. 6.9 1.34 0.013 0.035 Nov-04 0.142 33. 398. 79. 7.7 1.97 0.02 0.213 Dec-04 0.165 13. 354. 40. 7.2 2.2 0.046 0.152 Dec-04 0.119 10. 144. 23. 7.6 0.48 0.011 0.041 Dec-04 0.063 " 26. 733. 65. 7.9 1.31 0.017 0.147 Dec-04 0.065 31. 613. 89. 8.5 1.56 0.017 0.243 Dec-04 0.102 6. 51. 19. 7.5 0.58 0.019 0.016 Jan-05 0.131 186. 37. 7.3 2.19 0.037 0.042 Jan-05 0.107 11. 108. 6.7 1.87 0.047 0.017 Jan-05 0.129 4. 61. 11. 6.9 1.23 0.023 0:012 Jan-05 0.116 24. 218. 15. 7. 1.18 0.026 0.037 Feb-05 0.022 37. 188. 31. 6.9 0.89 0.009 0.031 Feb-05 0.222 72. 433. 13. 7.2 1.1 0.013 0.092 Feb-05 0.117 14. 391. 11. 7.3 0.96 0.017 0.094 ` Feb-05 0.122 9. 260. 10. 7.3 0.89 0.012 0.068 Mar-05 0.132 9. 207. 9. 7.1 1.35 0.014 0.055 Mar-05 0.062 19. 314. 87. 7.4 3.72 0.014 0.16 Mar-05 0.078 28. 936. 114. 7.4 3.32 0.028 0.174 Mar-05 0.026 20. > 548. 388. 7.6 1.81 0.012 0.302 Mar-05 0.031 36. 189. 26. 6.7 3.64 0.014 0.058 Apr-05 0.2 8.8 188. 42. 7.4 1.76 0.018 0.07 Apr-05 0.142 9.84 173. 30. 7.4 1.97 0.02 0.075 Apr-05 0.115 33. 497. 175. 7.6 1.92 0.019 0.215 Apr-05 0.094 59. 293. 17. 7.2 2.38 0.017 0.091 May-05 0.134 5. 127. 17. 6.8 1.5 0.015 0.029 May-05 0.032 60. 506. 190. 7.9 1.7 0.017 0.21 May-05 0.051 81. 1055. 21. 7.3 2.1 0.021 0.155 May-05 0.158 30. 298. 33. 7.1 1.6 0.016 0.162 Jun-05 0.222 73. 599. 147. 7.2 2.93 0.029 0.223 DAILY AVERAGES Date Flow MGD(mg/1) BOD COD (mg/1) TSS m I(mall) Sulfide Phenol m I Chromiu mm Jul-04 0.289 1.74 14.48 0.58 0.04 0.00 0.003 Jul-04 0.247 8.74 104.86 32.04 0.55 0.01 0.020 Jul-04 0.106 90.49 424.19 56.56 1.81 0.02 0.040 Jul-04 0.085 59.25 362.53 21.16 2.09 0.04 0.134 Aug-04 0.139 26.74 356.26 30.19 0.95 0.01 0.135 Aug-04 0.192 13.74 164.24 11.87 0.44 0.D0 0.051 Aug-04 0.224 20.34 215.72 32.12 0.64 0.01 0.092 Aug-04 0.161 11.92 186.19 31.28 0.82 0.01 0.073 Sep-04 0.279 10.31 98.85 17.19 0.64 0.01 0.041 Sep-04 0.082 62.88 671.17 184.24 1.83 0.02 0.265 Sep-04 0.047 272.97 1528.14 68.88 3.60 0.04 0.184 Sep-04 0.225 17.59 258.99 7.46 1.09 0.01 0.045 Sep-04 0.161 26.81 184.70 5.96 0.82 0.01 0.023 Oct-04 0.147 5.87 102.77 4.24 0.53 0.01 0.006 Oct-04 0.176 2.04 81.75 6.20 0.52 0.01 0.010 Oct-04 0.142 2.96 114.84 12.67 1.00 0.01 0.026 Oct-04 0.055 45.78 667.10 137.34 5.71 0.06 0.137 Nov-04 0.084 7.28 111.34 15.70 1.23 0.01 0.027 Nov-04 0.171 6.66 138.14 13.32 0.95 0.01 0.021 Nov-04 0.135 3.55 133.23 10.66 1.19 0.01 0.031 Nov-04 0.142 27.87 336.07 66.71 1.66 0.02 0.180 Dec-04 0.165 9.45 257.25 29.07 1.60 0.03 0.110 Dec-D4 0.119 10.08 145.09 23.17 0.48 0.01 0.041 Dec-04 0.063 49.48 1395.07 123.71 2.49 0.03 0.280 Dec-04 0.065 57.19 1130.79 164.18 2.88 0.03 0.448 Dec-04 0.102 7.05 59.95 22.34 0.68 0.02 0.019 Jan-05 0.131 170.25 33.87 2.00 0.03 0.038 Jan-05 0.107 12.33 121.02 2.10 0.05 0.019 Jan-05 0.129 3.72 56.70 10.22 1.14 0.02 0.011 Jan-05 0.116 24.81 225.34 15.50 1.22 0.03 0.038 Feb-05 0.022 201.66 1024.63 168.96 4.85 0.05 0.169 Feb-05 0.222 38.89 233.87 7.02 0.59 0.01 0.050 Feb-05 0.117 14.35 400.71 11.27 0.98 0.02 0.096 Feb-05 0.122 8.85 255.53 SIM 0.87 0.01 0.067 Mar-05 0.132 8.18 188.03 8.18 1.23 0.01 0.050 Mar-05 0.062 36.74 607.26 168.25 7.19 0.03 0.309 Mar-05 0.078 43.04 1438.85 175.24 5.10 0.04 0.267 Mar-05 0.026 92.23 2527.21 1789.34 8.35 0.06 1.393 Mar-05 0.031 139.24 731.03 100.56 14.08 0.05 0.224 Apr-05 0.2 5.28 112.71 25.18 1.06 0.01 0.042 Apr-05 0.142 8.31 146.08 25.33 1.66 0.02 0.063 Apr-05 0.115 34.41 518.19 182.46 2.00 0.02 0.224 Apr-05 0.094 75.26 373.74 21.68 3.04 0.02 0.116 May-05 0.134 4.47 113.64 15.21 1.34 0.01 0.026 May-05 0.032 224.82 1895.98 711.93 6.37 0.06 0.787 May-05 0.051 190.44 2480.37 49.37 4.94 0.05 0.364 May-05 0.158 22.77 226.15 25.04 1.21 0.01 0.123 Jun-05 0.222 39.43 323.52 79.40 1.58 0.02 0.120 Jun-05 0.107 58.27 263.34 26.89 2.41 0.03 0.058 Jun-05 0.706 2.72 26.32 24.46 0.28 0.00 0.009 Jun-05 0.197 94.34 567.26 43.21 1.35 0.01 0.125 Jun-05 0.077 127.69 506.09 87.20 3.21 0.03 0.148 Jul-05 0.346 0.04 0.55 0.08 0.01 0.00 0.000 Jul-05 0.239 20.07 188.13 79.27 0.03 0.02 0.088 Jul-05 0.204 14.69 134.60 30.56 0.03 0.01 0.017 Jul-05 0.162 33.31 162.09 26.65 1.58 0.01 0.057 Aug-05 0.565 22.28 98.89 34.59 0.55 0.01 0.023 Aug-05 0.267 16.17 101.04 23.35 0.85 0.01 0.044 Aug-05 0.282 12.33 131.81 10.20 1.02 0.02 0.070 Aug-05 0,095 44.18 388.74 88.35 5.81 0.03 0.144 Aug-05 0.385 15.57 106.20 5.92 1.12 0.01 0.028 Sep-05 0.276 1.39 37.36 4.78 0.76 0.01 0.020 Sep-05 0.171 11.22 86.95 16.13 2.10 0.02 0.058 Sep-05 0.23 31.80 243.98 29.19 1.28 0.01 0.082 Sep-05 0.186 43.84 114.10 12.89 1.64 0.02 0.055 Oct-05 0.219 9.31 81.58 7.12 0.99 0.01 0.034 Oct-05 0.132 21.80 147.16 18.17 1.82 0.02 0.106 Oct-05 0.388 14.83 69.84 5.25 0.53 0.01 0.020 Oct-05 0.195 7.38 102.69 10.45 1.05 0.01 0.063 Nov-05 0.332 8.67 31.06 6.14 0.61 0.01 0.022 Nov-05 0.397 21.14 40.17 4.83 0.48 0.00 0.028 Nov-05 0.212 9.61 102.37 9.61 0.96 0.01 0.024 Nov-05 0.108 26.65 276.45 16.65 1.89 0.02 0.072 Nov-05 0.116 17.57 210.87 12.40 1.76 0.02 0.074 Dec-05 0.162 9.62 197.62 8.14 0.74 0.01 0.078 Dec-05 0.142 35.46 411.22 33.78 2.87 0.02 0.116 Dec-05 0.135 52.40 371.26 37.30 0.89 0.04 0.102 Dec-05 0.145 10.75 51.27 4.96 0.83 0.01 0.029 Jan-06 0.072 21.65 51.63 36.64 3.66 0.04 0.022 Jan-06 0.047 58.68 670.95 28.06 3.88 0.04 0.181 Jan-06 0.153 41.54 244.51 11.76 1.68 0.02 0.081 Jan-06 0.178 13.47 117.21 12.13 1.97 0.01 0.049 Feb-06 0.155 4.64 137.70 7.74 2.24 0.02 0.060 Feb-06 0.167 10.77 154.37 8.62 2.94 0.01 0.055 Feb-06 0.167 17.23 196.01 17.23 2.94 0.07 0.060 Feb-06 0.196 6.12 123.57 7.95 2.02 0.09 0.043 Mar-06 0.153 9.40 130.09 8.62 2.43 0.01 0.056 Mar-06 0.079 3.04 71.34 13.66 1.49 0.01 0.033 Mar-06 0.198 7.27 123.54 43.00 1.82 0.01 0.063 Mar-06 0.168 22.13 118.48 22.13 2.30 0.01 0.061 Mar-06 0.211 3.41 23.30 6.25 1.56 0.04 0.022 Apr-06 0.237 7.59 62.23 21.75 1.88 0.05 0.030 Apr-06 0.252 32.36 227.44 10.47 1.91 0.10 0.071 Apr-06 0.143 31.02 250.71 12.58 3.48 0.09 0.099 Apr-06 0.134 69.79 457.25 28.63 3.60 0.09 0.117 May-06 0.204 19.40 238.63 41.14 2.27 0.01 0.006 May-06 0.248 15.47 193.88 43.03 1.91 0.00 0.082 May-06 0.236 8.64 85.36 16.26 1.54 0.04 0.038 May-06 0.177 23.03 105.00 18.97 1.83 0.05 0.025 May-06 0.263 16.87 238.44 7.29 1.78 0.04 0.107 Jun-06 0.232 18.61 106.47 5.17 1.51 0.04 0.016 Jun-06 0.127 14.16 100.08 12.27 3.54 0.08 0.025 Jun-06 0.252 6.19 52.81 27.12 1.55 0.04 0.024 Jun-06 0.158 5.31 41.74 9.11 2.05 0.05 0.023 Jul-06 0.23 0.99 7.82 1.41 0.40 0.01 0.002 Jul-06 0.137 2.71 72.64 15.75 2.69 0.00 0.032 Jul-06 0.235 3.42 66.33 6.12 1.72 0.04 0.015 Jul-06 0.113 13.79 120.97 18.04 4.09 0.10 0.041 0.71 1 272.97 1 2527.21 1 1789.34 1 14.08 1 0.10 1 1.39 k Lk- Jun-05 0.107 52. 235. 24. 6.6 2.15 . 0.028 0.052 Jun-05 0.706 16. 155. 144. 6.7 1.63 0.016 0.052 Jun-05 0.197 155. 932. 71. 6.7 2.22 0.024 0.206 Jun-05 0.077 82. 325. 56. 6.6 2.06 0.021 0.095 Jul-05 0.346 0.12 1.58 0.22 7.1 0.017 0.0002 0.0007 Jul-05 0.239 40. 375. 158. 7.1 0:06 0.047 0.175 Jul-05 0.204 25. 229. 52. 7.2 0.05 0.02 0.029 Jul-05 0.162 45. 219. 36. 7.8 2.14 0.02 0.077 Aug-05 0.565 1051 466. 163. 6:9 2.6 0.026 0.108 Aug-05 0.267 36. 225. 52. 6.8 1.9 0.027 0.099 Aug-05 0.282 29. 310. 24. 7. 2.4 0.044 0.164 Aug-05 0.095 35. 308. 70. 7.1 4.6 0.022 0.114 Aug-05 0.385 50. 341. 19. 6.9 3.6 0.024 0.091 Sep-05 0.276 3.2 86. 11. 7.8 1.75 0.016 0.046 Sep-05 0.171 16. 124. 23. 6.7 2.99 0.023 0.083 Sep-05 0.23 61. 468. 56. 6.7 2.45 0.025 0.157 ' Sep-05 0.186 68. 177. 20. 6.9 2.54 0.025 .0.086 Oct-05 0.219 17. 149. 13. 6.6 1.8 0.018 0.063 Oct-05 0.132 24. 162. 20. 7.2 2 0.02 0.117 Oct-05 0.388 48. 226. 17. 7.4 1.7 0.017 0.065 Oct-05 0.195 12. 167. 17. 7.1 1.7 0.017 0.103 Nov-05 0.332' 24. 86. 17. 7.4 -1.7 0.017 0.06 Nov-05 0.397 70. 133. 16. 7.2 1.6 0.016 0.092 Nov705 0.212 17. 181. 17. 6.9 1.7 0.017 0.043 Nov-05 0.108 24. 249. 15. 7.8 1.7 0.019 0.065 Nov-05 0.116 17. 204. 12. 7.7 1.7 0.017 0.072 Dec-05 0.162 13. 267. 11. 7.8 1 0.02 0.105 Dec-05 0.142 42. 487. 40. 7.6 3:4 0.019 0.137 Dec-05 0.135 59. 418. 42. 7.6 1 0.042 0.115 Dec-05 0.145 13. 62. 6. 6.6 1 0.01 0.035 Jan-06 0.072 13. 31. 22. - 7. 2.2 0.022 0.013 Jan-06 0.047 23. 263. 11. 6.6 1.52 0.015 0.071 Jan-06 0.153 53. 312. 15. 6.7 2.15 0.022 0.103 Jan-06 0.178 20. 174. 18. 6.5 2.92 0.015 0.072 Feb-06 0.155 6. 178. 10. 6.7 2.9 0.0287 0.077 Feb-06 0.167 15. 2' 5. 12. 6.8 4.1 0.014 0.077 Feb-06 0.167 24. 273. 24. 6.8 4.1 0.1023 0.083 Feb-06 0.196 10. 202. 13. 6.8 3.3 0.1454 0.07 Mar-06 0.153 12. 166. 11. 6.9 3.1 0.016 0.071 Mar-06 0.079 2. 47. 9. 6.8 0.98 0.005 0.022 Mar-06 0.198 12. 204. 71. 7. 3 0.015 0.104 Mar-06 0.168 31. 166. 31. 7.4 3.22 0.016 0.085 Mar-06 0.211 6. 41. 11. 6.9 2.75 0.069 0.038 Apr-06 0.237 15. 123. 43. 7.2 3.72 0.105 0.06 Apr-06 0.252 68. 478: 22. 7.4 4.02 0.201 0.149 Apr-06 0.143 37. 299. 15. 7.2 4.15 0.104 0.118 Apr-06 0.134 78. 511. 32. 7.3 4.02 0.1 0.131 May-06 0.204 33. 406. 70. 6.7 3.87 0.01 0.01 May-06 0.248 32. 401. 89. 6.7 3.95 0.01 0.17 May-06 0.236 17. 168. 32. 6.7 3.04 0.076 0.074 May-06 0.177 34. 155. 28. 6.6 2.7 0.067 0.037 May-06 0.263 37. 523. 16. 6.7 3.9 0.098 0.234 Jun-06 0.232 36. 206. 10. 6.8 2.92 0.07 0.031 Jun-06 0.127 15. 106. 13. 6.9 3.75 0.09 0.026 Jun-06 0.252 13. 111. 57. 6.7 3.25 0.08 0.05 Jun-06 0.158 7. 55. 12. 6.7 2.7 0.07 0.03 Jul-06 0.23 1.9 15. 2.7 6.8 0.76 0.019 0.003 Jul-06 0.137 3.1 83. 18. 6.7 3.07 0.037 Jul-06 0.235 6.7 130. 12. 6.8 3.37 0.084 0.03 Jul-06 0.113 13. 114. 17. 6.8 3.85 0.096 0.039 Average 0.17 29.73 271.65 40.61 7.10 2.08 0.03 0.09 Maximum 0.71 155.00 1055.00 388.00 8.50 4.60 0.20 0.30 Minimum 0.02 0.12 1.58 0.22 6.50 0.02 0.00 0.00 MONTHLY AVERAGES Date Flow (MGD) SOD (lb/day) COD (lb/day) TSS (lb/day) pH (su) SuN1de (INday) Phenol (lb/day) Chromiu m (lb/day) Jul-04 0.094 36.05 220.73 33.10 7.05 0.00 0.12 0.04 Aug-04 0.116 26.75 332.25 39.00 7.18 0.00 0.00 0.13 Sep-04 0.139 48.60 404.40 43.00 7.46 0.00 0.01 0.09 OCt-04 0.140 8.68 172.00 23.08 7.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 Nov-04 0.148 12.90 205.75 30.25 7.15 0.00 0.00 0.07 Dec-04 0.129 17.20 379.00 47.20 7.74 0.00 0.02 0.12 Jan-05 0.145 SYS 143.25 15.75 6.98 0.00 0.03 0.03 Feb-05 0.144 33.00 318.00 16.25 7.18 0.00 0.01 0.07 Mar-05 0.208 22.40 438.80 124.80 7.24 2.50 0.00 0.15 Apr-05 0.184 27.68 287.75 66.00 7.40 1.08 0.00 0.11 May-05 0.169 44.00 496.50 65.25 7.28 0.00 0.00 0.14 Jun-05 0.234 75.60 449.20 88.40 6.76 0.00 0.01 0.13 Jul-05 0.213 27.53 206.15 61.56 7.30 0.01 0.01 0.07 Aug-05 0.248 51.00 330.00 65.60 6.94 1.64 0.01 0.12 Sep-05 0.214 37.05 213.75 27.50 7.03 1.19 0.00 0.09 Ott-05 0.177 25.25 176.00 16.75 7.08 0.00 0.00 0.09 Nov-05 0.155 30.40 170.60 15.40 7.40 0.00 0.00 0.07 Dec-05 0.180 31.75 308.50 24.75 7.40 0.85 0.02 0.10 Jan-06 0.200 27.25 195.00 16.50 6.70 0.38 0.00 0.06 Feb-06 0.157 13.75 217.00 14.75 6.78 0.00 0.07 0.08 Mar-06 0.147 12.60 124.80 26.60 7.00 - 0.00 0.00 0.06 Apr-06 0.207 49.50 352.75 28.00 7.28 0.00 0.08 0.11 May-06 0.175 30.60 330.60 47.00 6.68 0.00 0.00 0.11 Jun-06 0.164 17.75 119.50 23.00 6.78 0.00 0.00 0.03 Jul-D6 0.133 6.18 85.50 1 12.43 6.78 0.00 1 0.00 0.03 Average 0.17 28.93 267.11 38.33 7.170 0.31 0.02 0.09 Maximum 0.25 75.60 496.50 124.80 1 7.74 2.50 0.12 0.15 Minimum 0.09 6.18 85.50 12.43 6.68 0.00 0.00 0.03 MONTHLY AVERAGES Date Flow (MGD) BOD Img/1) COD (Mgt[) TSS (mgl) Sulfide (mgn) Phenol (m9/1) Chromiu m (MCA) Jul-04 Aug-04 Sep-04 Oct-04 Nov-04 Dea04 Jan-05 Feb-05 Mar-05 Apr-05 May-05 Jun-05 Jul-05 Aug-05 SOP-05 Oct-05 NOV-05 Dec-05 Jan-06 Feb-06 Mar-06 Apr-06 May-06 Jun-06 Jul-06 0.094 0.116 0.139 0.140 0.148 0.129 0.145 0.144 0.208 0.184 0.169 0.234 0.213 0.248 0.214 0.177 0.155 0.180 0.200 0.157 0.147 0.207 0.175 0.164 0.133 45.98 27.63 41.81 7.41 10.47 15.98 8.09 27.44 12.92 18.07 31.18 38.82 15.52 24.69 20.77 17.15 23.57 21.14 16.36 10.48 10.25 28.71 20.99 13.00 1 5.57 281.55 343.24 347.92 146.94 168.92 352.19 118.80 264.45 253.07 188.02 351.59 230.64 116.20 159.74 119.84 119.55 132.29 205.43 117.08 165.35 101.57 204.63 226.77 87.53 77.06 42.22 40.29 36.99 19.71 24.54 43.86 13.06 13.51 71.98 43.13 46.21 45.39 34.70 31.75 15.42 11.38 11.94 16.48 9.91 11.24 21.65 16.24 32.24 16.85 11.20 0.00 0.15 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.01 0.08 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.03 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.06 1.44 0.00 0.09 0.70 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.01 0.06 0.01 0.01 0.04 0.79 0.01 0.06 0.66 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.57 0.02 0.07 0.23 0.00 0.04 0.00 0.05 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.00 0.04 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.03 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.02 Average Maximum Minimum 0.17 0.25 0.. 20.56 45.98 5.571 195.13 352.19 77.06 27.28 71.98 9.911 0.18 1." 0.00 0.01 0.15 0.00 0.06 0.13 0.02 Org Name Station ID Activity Start Activity Del Activity Del Characteri: Sample Fr Result Valt Units Analytical Proc ID NCDENR-I C6500000 11/20/2002 11:30 0.1 m Copper Total 3.4 ug/I USEPA -220.2 NCDENR-1 C6500000 2/13/2003 12:10 0.1 m Copper Total 2.8 ug/I USEPA -220.2 NCDENR-1 C6500000 51221200313:20 0.1 m Copper Total 26 ug/l USEPA -220.2 NCDENR-1 C6500000 8/14/2003 11:45 0.1 m Copper Total 3.1 ug/I USEPA -220.2 NCDENR-1 C6500000 11/13/2003 10:00 0.1 m Copper Total 2.3 ug/l USEPA -220.2 NCDENR-1 C6500000 2/12/2004 13:30 0.1 m Copper Total 2.6 ug/I USEPA- -220.2 NCDENR-1 C6500000 5/13/2004 16:00 0.1 m Copper Total 3.1 ug/l USEPA -220.2 NCDENR-1 C6606000 81181200414:30 0.1 m Copper Total 14 ug/l USEPA -220.2 NCDENR-I C6500000 11/15/2004 12:00 0.1 m Copper Total 3.7 ug/l USEPA -200.8(W) NCDENR-1 C6500000 2/9/2005 14:15 0.1 m Copper Total *Non=detect USEPA -200.8(W) NCDENR-1 C6500000 5/23/2005 11:16 0.1 m Copper Total *Non -detect USEPA -200.8(W) NCDENR-1 C6500000 8/10/2005 15:40 0.1 m Copper Total 4 ug/I USEPA -200.8(W) NCDENR-I C6500000 11/15/2005 14:40 0.1 m Copper Total *Non -detect USEPA -200.8(W) NCDENR-1 C7000000 9/241200214:00 0.1 m Copper Total 13 ug/l USEPA -226.2 NCDENR-1 C7000000 3/251200312:00 0.1 m Copper Total 9.5 ug/I USEPA -220.2 NCDENR-1 C7000000 61261200315:30 0.1 m Copper Total 9.4 ug/t USEPA -220.2 NCDENR-1 C7000000 9129/200311:00 0.1; m Copper Total 8.7 ug/l USEPA -220.2 NCDENR-1 C7000000 1219/200314:00 0.1 m Copper Total 8.3 ug/l USEPA -220.2 NCDENR-I C7000000 3/11/2004 10:47 0.1 m Copper Total 5.3 ug/I USEPA -220.2 NCDENR-1 C7000000 6129/200414:45 0.1 -m Copper Total 7.8 ug/l USEPA -220.2 NCDENR-1 C7000000 91301200412:00 . 0.1 m Copper Total 7.9 ug/l USEPA -220.2 NCDENR-1 C7000000 121812004-12:16 0.1 m Copper Total 7.6 ug/l USEPA -200.8(W) NCDENR-1 C7000000 3/30/2005 14:00 0.1 m Copper Total 6.7 ug/I USEPA -200.8(W) NCDENR-I.C7000000 61221200611:00 . 0.1 m Copper Total 8.9 ug/l USEPA -200.8(W) NCDENR-1 C7000000 91261200612:15 0.1 m Copper Total 7.3 ug/l USEPA -200.8(W) NCDENR-I C7000000 12/28/2005 13:40 0.1 m Copper Total 4.7 ug/I USEPA -200.8(W) C6500000 SF Catawba R at NC7 at McAdenville C7000000 SF Catawba R near Belmont te: Fw: a conf call on mon or Um Subject: Re: Fw: a conf call on mon or tues From: "Melinda Vickers" <VICKERMG@dhec.sc.gov> Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 07:42:17 -0400 To: <Hyatt.Marshali@epamail.epa gov>, <jackie.nowell@ncmail.net> Sorry, I was out yesterday. I have a meeting this morning (Tues) from 9-10. Any time this afternoon work? I am open all day tomorrow (wed). Here is a basic summary of what I need to see so Jackie can be thinking about it: I was looking for the DMR data (basically the highest sample ever recorded) so I could check into reasonable potential for chromium and sulfide. We have water quality standards for both of these parameters that I wanted to compare to the guidelines values to determine if the WQ limits are more stringent and to see if reasonable potential exists. It appears that our sulfide WQ limits would be slightly more restrictive than the guidelines. Also, the limits derived for guidelines are much higher than the previous permit limits. No justification was given for backsliding or any info on an antidegradation review being performed to allow an increase in the limits. See the attached spreadsheet for a summary of the values that I am using to make these comparisons. II <Hyatt.Marshall@epamail.epa.gov> 7/21/06 2:44 PM >>> which time of Jackie's is good for you, if any? ----- Forwarded by Marshall Hyatt/R4/USEPA/US on 07/21/2006 02:43 PM Jackie Nowell <jackie.nowell@n cmail.net> Marshall Hyatt/R4/USEPA/US@EPA 07/21/2006 02:42 PM To cc Subject Re: a conf call on mon or tues Hyatt.Marshall@epamail.epa.gov wrote: mon afternoon is bad for me. any other time mon or tues is good. let me know when you are/aren't free. Monday 10:15 - 12 noon or Tuesday 9 - 9:30 am I of 2 7/25/2006 9:06 AM REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS Pharr Yarns Outfall 001 NC0004812 Qw = 0.5 MGD Time Period 2003-2004 Qw (MGD) 0.5 WWTP Class III 7010S (cfs) 125 IWC (%) @ 7Q10S 0.6162 7Q10W(cfs) 228 @ 7Q10W 0.3388 30Q2 (cfs) 310 @ 3002 0.2494 Avg, Stream Flow, QA WS) 808 @ QA 0.0958 Racking Stream South Forks Catawba River Stream Class WS-V STANDARD 8 PARAMETER TYPE CRRERIA (2) POL Units REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS RECOMMENDED ACTION NCwnS/ %FAVf n #Der. 1Yr FNd C1 AIn'tlk Cr (1) Crean[ Aox* Aade: WA SutSdes NC 2 uglL 42 0 314.7 _— __�5 _ -_______ _______-_-___ CIMa111G Awh: 580 Chromium NC 28 580 u91L 21 21 $5.8 ________________._______ ChatYC 4,544 Acute: WA Ph, -I, A 1 uBIL 24 4 18.0 _ — Chronic: 401-- Legend: C = Cerdnogenlc NC = Nor camnogenic A = Aesthetic "Freshwater Discharge Phan yarn& rpa- 20D4srstds, rpa 7/25/2006 REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS Pharr Yarns Outfall 001 NC0004812 Qw = 1 MGD Time Period 2003-2004 Qw (MGD) 1 WWrP Class III 7Qi0S (c/s) 125 IWC (%) 7Ql0S 1.2248 7QtoW(C/s) 228 g7Q1aW 0.6752 30Q2 (ds) 310 @ 30Q2 0.4975 Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cis) 808 @ QA 0.1915 RecNng Stream South Forks Catawba River Stream Class WS-V TANDARDS& PARAMETER TYPE CRITERIA 12) POL Units REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS RECOMMENDED ACTION Acrosl XFAVI tbanc acute n rM[ Ma PNd Cr A/orabb (1) Acute: WA /1'ircl[. ._L.� Z�%� %/ Ih r �_C____________ Sutkdes NC 2 uglL 42 0 3147 __ Chmnic: 163 v •"---, / A. /jtyc Acute: 580 Chromium NC 28 580 ug/L 21 21 85.3 ---- --- ------------ Chmnic: 2,286 Acute: WA PMnob A 1 N ug/L 24 4 18.0 ---------------------------- Chronic: 201 Legend. "Freshwater Discharge C = Ceninogenic NC = Non-caminogenic A = AesMeac Phan yams rpa 2004scstds, rya 725/2006 Date Sulfide (lbs/day) Qw m d conc.(mcA) conc. u /I Jul-05 <2.14 <2.14 <2.14 7/20/2005 0.05 0.25 0.024 mgA 24 ugA Jun-05 <2.9 <2.9 <2.9 <2.9 <2.9 May-05 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 <2.1 Apr-05 <1.9 <1.9 4/20/2005 1.92 0.137 1.680 mgA 1680 mg/I 4/27/2005 2.38 0.202 1.413 mgA 1413 mg/I Mar-05 <1.35 3/9/2005 3.72 0.171 2.608 mgA 2608 ug/I 3/16/2005 3.32 0.332 1.199 mgA 1199 ug/I 3/23/2005 1.81 0.135 1.608 mgA 1608 ug/I 3/31 /2005 3.64 0.167 2.613 mgA 2613 ug/I Feb-05 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 <1.1 Jan-05 <2.19 <2.19 <2.19 <2.19 Date Sulfide (Ibs/day) Qw m d conc.(mciA) conc. WWI May-06 <3.87 <3.87 <3.87 <3.87 <3.87 Apr-06 <3.72 <3.72 <3.72 <3.72 <3.72 Mar-06 <3.72 <3.72 <3.72 <3.72 <3.72 Feb-06 4.72 <3.72 <3.72 <3.72 Jan-06 <2.2 <2.2 <2.2 1/11/2006 1.52 0.192 0.949 mg/I 949 ug/I 1.52 0.192 0.949 949 January avg. 0.38 0.2 0.2278 mg/I 228 ug/I Dec-05 <1 <1 <1 12/14/2005 3.4 0.228 1.788 mg/I 1788 ug/I December avg. 0.85 0.18 0.566 mg/I 566 ugA Nov-05 <1.7 <1.6 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 Oct-05 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 <1.7 Sep-05 1.75 0.191 1.099 mgA 1099 ug/I 9/14/2005 2.99 0.276 1.299 mgA 1299 ug/I <2.45 <2.45 Aug-05 <2.6 <2.6 <2.6 8/24/2005 4.6 0.262 2.105 mg/I 2105 ugA /or'G� 4rZ¢ ,a , zog C4 a 3 N. I— . L w7�[d = 22% � �Z7� 63:f••� � = .6, 3,s'� c�3j�,rZ - w ?� �u yr�/� - 3oq 36'9 cis Av 7- Alf- -Al TEXTILE EFFLUENT LIMITS SPREADSHEET PERMIT NO: PERMITTEE: COUNTY: PERMITTED FLOW: NC0004812 PHARR YARNS, INC. GASTON 1 MGD BASED ON 40CFR410.70 SUBPART G STOCK AND YARN FINISHING SUBCATEGORY PRODUCTION DATA (in Ibs/day): DAILY MAX. 24000 according to EPA recommendation MONTHLY AVG. 24000 FROM 40CFR 410.70 SUBPART G (all limits in Ibs/1000 Ibs) k ERAQFj, 6.8 3.4 84.6 42.3 17.4 8.7 7COD 0.24 0.12 0.12 0.06 0.120.06 st be between 6 and 9 at all times LIMITS 163.2 8 2030.4 101 417.6 20 e 5.8 )I 2.9 Chromium 2.9 must be between 6 and 9 at all times FOR PHARR YARNS, ONLY 27% OF FLOW IS PROCESS FLOW ADJUST LIMITS ACCORDINGLY: FINAL LIMITS 44.1 22.0 548.2 274.1 112.8 56.4 5.81 2.9 2.9 1.4 2.9 1.4 must be between 6 and 9 at all times DOMESTIC WASTE IS 73%, ADD ALLOCATION FOR THAT POLLUTANT DAILY MAX. MON BOD5 274.0 182.6 TSS 1 274.0 182.6 CODS 602.7318 401.8212 318.0 204.7 ' original SOD limits were 390 Ib/day (monthly ave) 1150.9 675.9 and 780 lb/day (daily max), so these limits are still 386.7 (b�dp 239.0 protective of DO e 5.81 1.3 2.9 A I 2.9 1.4 Chromium 2.9 1.4 must be between 6 and 9 at all times Re: Fw: NC0004812 Pharr Yarns effluent pages Subject: Re: Fw: NC0004812 Pharr Yarns effluent pages From: "Melinda Vickers" <VICYERMG@dhec.sc.gov> Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 07:36:25 -0400 To:<Hyatt.Marshall@epamail.epa.gov> CC: "Jeff DeBessonet" <DEBESSJP@dhec.sc.gov>, <jackie.nowell@ncmail.net> Back on June 16, I had asked Jackie Nowell for some DMR data so I could evaluate sulfide,'chromium and phenols (I copied you on that email). It appeared from the fact sheet that the SC WQ standards for these parameters were not considered (or if they were, there was no indication of such) and I wanted to see whether RP exists or not and what the derived WQ limits would be in comparison to the categorical limits. It appeared that only the categorical guidelines were limited. I never got a reply to my request from NC. Maybe this is something you have evaluated in your review, but there was nothing in what I was given to indicate such. I hope the permit has not moved forward. If it has been issued, I would like to see the final version of the -permit and know the appeal period for the permit. SC would be concerned if there were not limits protective of water quality in the permit. Melinda II (<Hyatt.Marshall@epamail.epa.gov> 7/13/06 3:03 PM >>> 'I ----- Forwarded by Marshall Hyatt/R4/USEPA/US on 07/13/2006 '03:03 PM Jackie Nowell <jackie.nowell@n cmail.net> Marshall Hyatt/R4/USEPA/US@EPA 07/13/2006 01:30 PM Re: NC0004812 Pharr Yarns effluent pages Hyatt.Marshall@epamail.epa.gov wrote: To CC Subject I asked SC in an email last week what they thought of your rationale for the lack of RP. I haven't heard from them. Hello Marshall, We did not receive another request for DMR data from SCDHEC (Susan asked you to mediate that request in a 6/16 email.) If you have not gotten a response from them on your email, I am going to move forward with finalizing the Pharr Yarns permit mod since you all have signed off on it. Unless you advise otherwise. 1 of 2 7/17/2006 9:09 AM Re: NC0004812 Pharr Yarns effluent pages have a water quality standard for sulfide, so the effluent guideline limit that is given should be protective of the stream. The allowable concentrations for phenols and chromium from the NC standards are less stringent that the effluent guideline limits that are given. The limits assigned in the permits from 1977 through 1996 were less stringent than the limits that will be assigned in this modification. 1996 limits 2006 limits Mon. Avg. Da. Max. Mon. Avg. Da. Max. sulfide 4.6 lbs/day 11.8 lbs/day 2.9 lbs/day 5.8 lbs/day Phenols 2.9 lbs/day 5.9 lbs/day 1.4 lbs/day 2.9 lbs/day Total Chromium 2.9 lbs/day 5.9 lbs/day 1.4 lbs/day 2.9 lbs/day An antidegradation statement can be added to the factsheet that states that The Division of Water Quality has determined that the increased limits will not result in contravention of applicable water quality standards or loss of the river's designated uses. An alternatives analysis was not performed because there was no increase in wasteflow or change in the effluent characteristics from the facility. Due to the stringency of the limits, the instream waste concentration of 0.6 % under 7Q10 conditions and the discharge point 8.5 miles above the mouth of the South Fork Catawba River before its confluence into the Catawba River, DWQ does not believe that the discharge of sulfide, phenols or total chromium from Pharr Yarns will effect the water quality in SC. The distance to the NC/SC state line and the amount of stream flow makes it unlikely that the SC standards for these parameters will be violated. Please contact me if there are any additional questions. BEGIN:VCARD VERSION:2.1 X-GWTYPE:USER FN:Melinda Vickers TEL;WORK:(803) 898-4186 ORG:;EQC Water TEL;PREF;FAX:(803) 898-4215 EMAIL;WORK;PREF;NGW:VICKERMG@dhec.sc.gov N:Vickers;Melinda END:VCARD Susan A. Wilson, P.E. Supervisor, Western NPDES Program (919) 733 - 5083, ext. 510 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 2 of 2 7/5/2006 10:27 AM f � [�11:I:I�fJBl3 if.Ti'F•TL9 Mike II Jackie Nowell <jackie.nowell@ncmail.net> 6/2/2006 4:03 PM >>> Michael, per the request in the April 27 letter from Mihir Mehta regarding the subject facility. The permit modification is for the revision of limits for sulfide, phenols, and total chromium based on effluent guidelines for 40 CFR 410.70 Stock and Yarn Finishing Subcategory. Attached is the draft cover letter, draft permit and factsheet for Pharr Yarns. Pharr Yarns discharges into the South Fork Catawba River with a 7Q10 of 125 cfs and an average flow of 808 cfs. At 0.5 MGD, Pharr Yarns has an instream waste concentration of 0.6 % . At the expansion flow of 1 MGD, the instream waste concentration is 1.2 8. The distance from the discharge point to the mouth of the South Fork Catawba River where it enters the Catawba River is approximately 8.5 miles. North Carolina has an action level standard for copper of 7 ug/l and the allowable copper concentrations for Pharr Yarns at the end of pipe would be 1136 ug/1 at 0.5 MGD and 572 ug/l at 1.0 MGD. If the SC standard for copper of 2.9 ug/1 is applied, the allowable concentration for copper at 0.5 MGD is 471 ug/l, and at 1.0 MGD, the allowable concentration for copper is 237 ug/l. There was one value for copper of 41 ug/l reported in the pollutant analysis done in Dec. 2004. This data value is substantially less than the allowable concentrations and would seem to indicate that copper is not a pollutant of concern for Pharr Yarns. In addition, Pharr Yarns has consistently passed its whole effluent toxicity test. Regarding fecal coliform, the recommended and the Pharr Yarns permit are 200/100ml (monthly (daily maximum). Please contact me if there regarding the modification of the Pharr Yarns BEGIN:VCARD VERSION:2.1 X-GWTYPE:USER FN:Melinda Vickers TEL;WORK:(803) 898-4186 ORG:;EQC Water TEL;PREF;FAX:(803) 898-4215 EMAIL;WORK;PREF;NGW:VICKERMG@dhec.sc.gov N:Vickers;Melinda END:VCARD existing limitations in average) and 400/100ml are any further questions permit. Fvd: NC0004812 Pharr Yarns permit.eml Content -Type: message/rfc822 4812-Fact Sheet- mod 2006.duc Content -Type: application/msword Content -Encoding: base64 Content -Type: application/msword 4812 draftmod1tr042006.doc Content -Encoding: base64 2 of 3 7/13/2006 1:42 PM Re: NC0004812 Pharr Yarns effluent pages Subject: Re: NC0004812 Pharr Yarns effluent pages From: Susan Wilson <susan.a.wilson@ncmail.net> Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 09:56:27 -0400 To: Hyatt.Marshall@epamail.epa.gov CC: jackie.nowell@ncmail.net Marshall - I'll talk to Melinda is necessary - but this really smacks of a lack of trust (it's starting to hurt our feelings) and we don't really think it's necessary to provide them with this. Jackie was correct - there is such an amount of dilution prior to the state line - that it shouldn't be an issue anyway. The other thing is - we screwed up the permit before and we need to get it corrected (and we've gone through all the proper .procedure to do so). So - could you mediate this one a bit? thanks! Melinda Vickers wrote: Can you send me the DMR-data set that you are using for your permit decision on Sulfide, phenols and chromium? Melinda G. Vickers, Manager Industrial Wastewater Permitting Section Bureau of Water SC Department of Health and Environmental Control 2600 Bull Street Columbia, SC 29201 803-898-4186 803-898-4095 FAX vickermg@dhec.sc.gov Jackie Nowell <jackie.nowell@ncmail.net>. 6/13/06 12:00 PM >>> Melinda, Thank you for your comments on the Pharr Yarns draft permit. I apologize about the deletion of the effluent pages, I forgot that the permit consisted of two files. The effluent pages with the limits are attached. The limits for sulfide, phenols, and total chromium were revised by DWQ after it was determined that the limits for these parameters were incorrectly reduced during calculations from the effluent guidelines. There was no increase in wasteflow from the facility or changes in production to stimulate the limits revision. This is a correction of our calculation and EPA has reviewed and approved the modification. Pharr Yarns has been discharging into the South Fork Catawba River since 1977. The limits for sulfide, phenols, and total chromium have been reevaluated at each renewal since that time. North Carolina does not 1 of 2 7/5/2006 10:27 AM 14C0004812 Pharr Yams effluent pages Subject: NC0004812 Pharr Yarns effluent pages From: Jackie Nowell <jackie.nowell@ncmail.net> Date: Tue,13 Jun 200612:00:24 -0400 To: VICKERMG@dhec.sc.gov, Michael Montebello <MONTEBMJ@dhec.sc.gov> CC: Susan A Wilson <Susan.A.Wilson@ncmail.net>, "Hyatt.Marshall@epamail.epa.gov" <I4yatt.Marshall@epamail.epa.gov> BCC: sergei chernikov <sergei.chernikov@ncmail.net> Melinda, Thank you for your comments.on the Pharr Yarns draft permit. I apologize about the deletion of the effluent pages, I forgot that the permit consisted of two files. The effluent pages with the limits are attached. The limits for sulfide, phenols, and total chromium were revised by DWQ after it was determined that the limits for these parameters were incorrectly reduced during calculations from the effluent guidelines. There was no increase in wasteflow from the facility or changes in production to stimulate the limits revision. This is a correction of our calculation and EPA has reviewed and approved the modification. Pharr Yarns has been discharging into the South Fork Catawba River since 1977. The limits for sulfide, phenols, and total chromium have been reevaluated at each renewal - since that time. North Carolina does not have a water quality standard for sulfide, so the effluent guideline limit that is given should be protective of the stream. The allowable concentrations for phenols and chromium from the NC standards are less stringent that the effluent guideline limits that are given. The limits assigned in the permits from 1977 through 1996 were less stringent than the limits that will be assigned in this modification. 1996 limits 2006 limits Mon. Avg. Da. Max. Mon. Avg. Da. Max. Sulfide 4.6 lbs/day 11.8 lbs/day 2.9 lbs/day 5.8 lbs/day Phenols 2.9 lbs/day 5.9 lbs/day 1.4 lbs/day 2.9 lbs/day Total Chromium 2.9 lbs/day 5.9 lbs/day 1.4 lbs/day 2.9 lbs/day An antidegradation statement can be added to the factsheet that states that The Division of Water Quality has determined that the increased limits will not result in contravention of applicable water quality standards or loss of the river's designated uses. An alternatives analysis was not performed because there was no increase in wasteflow or change in the effluent characteristics from the facility. Due to the stringency of the limits, the instream waste concentration of 0.6 % under 7Q10 conditions and the discharge point 8.5 miles above the mouth of the South Fork Catawba River before its confluence into the Catawba River, DWQ does not believe that the discharge of sulfide, phenols or total chromium from Pharr Yarns will effect the water quality in SC. The distance to the NC/SC state line and the amount of stream flow makes it unlikely that the SC standards for these parameters will be violated. Please contact me if there are any additional questions. 4812effluent-rev04072006.doc I Content -Type: application/msword Content -Encoding: base64 1 of 1 7/25/2006 9:04 AM Addition to the Factsheet 6/13/2006 To address SCDHEC's concern about antidegradation, The Division of Water Quality has determined that the increased limits will not result in contravention of applicable water quality standards or loss of the river's designated uses. An alternatives analysis was not performed because there was no increase in wasteflow or change in the effluent characteristics from the facility. l�lA4 DATE: (3 6 Fact Sheet NPDES NC0004812 Renewal Page 3 DENR/DWQ AMENDED FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT NPDES No. NC0004812 Facility Information Applicant/Facility Name: Pharr Yarns, Inc. Applicant Address: 100 Main Street, McAdenville, NC 28101 Facility Address: 147 Willow Drive, McAdenville, NC 28101 Permitted Flow 0.511.0 MGD Type of Waste: 100% Industrial Facility/Permit Status: Class I/Active; Renewal Count Gaston Count Miscellaneous Receiving Stream: South Fork Catawba River Regional Office: MRO Stream Classification: WS-V State Grid / USGSQuad: F14SE/ 303(d) Listed? No Permit Writer: Jackie Nowell Subbasin: 03-08-36 Date: Aril 7, 2006 Drainage Area (im): 636 • Lat. 350 15' 40" N Long. 8l ° 04' 39" W Summer? 10 (cfs) 125 Winter 7Q10 (cfs): 228 30 2 (cfs) 310 Average Flow cfs): 808 IWC (%): 1.2 BASIS FOR PERMIT MODIFICATION Pharr Yams has requested that the limits for sulfide, phenols, and total chromium that were assigned in the January 21, 2005 permit be reevaluated. A review of the spreadsheet used in calculating limitations based on plant production data and effluent guidelines from 40 CFR 410.70 Subpart G STOCK AND YARN FINISHING SUBCATEGORY shows that limits were assigned based on only a percentage of plant process flow. The correct effluent limits for sulfide, phenols and total chromium, while calculated on the attached spreadsheet, were not assigned in the 2005 permit. This abbreviated fact sheet recommends a modification in the limits for the three parameters. The previous permit writer had conferred with EPA about the monthly average production value that should be used and it was decided that 24000 pounds per day would be appropriate for calculation of daily maximum and monthly average limits. Pharr Yarns is currently having compliance problems meeting the existing limits for sulfide, phenols, and total chromium due to the stringency of those limits. This modification is to apply the appropriate limits as calculated by effluent guidelines. The correct limits are listed below and all limits should be in lbs/day POLLUTANT > DAILY MAX MONTHLY AVERAGE Sulfide 5.8 2.9 Phenol 2.9 1.4 Total Chromium 2.9 1.4 EXISTING LIMITS TO BE MODIFIED POLLUTANT Sulfide DAILY MAX MONTHLY AVERAGE 2.3 0.8 Phenol 1.2 0. Total Chromium 1.2 0.4 No Sheet NPDES NC0004912 Renewal Page I CHANGES TO THE PERMIT ■ Revised limits for sulfide, phenols and total chromium will be given based on monthly average production value of 24000 lbs/day projected for 2005. This monthly average production number was used to calculate both the monthly average and daily maximum limits. There should be no adjustment for percentage of process flow. The revised limits will be higher than those given in 2005 permit. STATE CONTACT If you have any questions on any of the above information or on the attached permit, please contact Jackie Nowell at (919) 733-5038 ext. 512. Aluel NAM . DATE: c �' REGIONAL OFFICE COMMENTS NAME: DATE: Fact Sheet NFDF,S NCOW4812 Renewal Paac' NC0004812 Pharr Yams Subject: NC0004812 Phan Yarns From: "Melinda Vickers" <VICKERMG@dhec.sc.gov> Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 15:14:51 -0400 To: <jackie.nowell@ncmail.net> CC: "JeffDeBessonet" <DEBESSJP@dhec.sc.gov>, "Michael Montebello" <MONTEBMJ@dhec.sc.gov>, <Hyatt.Marshall@epamail.epa gov> Mike Montebello forwarded me the permit modification that you e-mailed him to review because I handle the industrial discharges in SC. I noticed that your public comment period ended on May 19. I just received this today and hoped my comments could still be considered. The permit that is attached does not include the limitations you referenced in your letter. There seems to be a discussion of NET, nutrients and color, but not the guideline parameters that were all d increased loadings. Could you send the appropriate permit or permit pagqW to me for review? Based on the Fact Sheet, I do not see any record of an antibackslding or antidegradation review having been performed to show the need to relax the limits. This may have been done, but justification was not provided in the fact sheet. If this review was done, how was it decided that the additional load could be allowed? In SC, our Water Quality Standards regulation requires we evaluate alternatives to discharge (such as can they operate the system more efficiently to achieve existing limits, can part or all of the wastewater be land applied or sent to a POTW, etc) before increased loading will be allowed. We might also only allow a portion of the increase rather than the entire amount allowed by guidelines. This allows for additional protection of water quality. Also, none of the attached documents discusses the water quality criteria for chromium and sulfide in SC standards. I doubt with the dilution that it would be an issue, but I wanted to make sure these were considered. Melinda G. Vickers, Manager Industrial Wastewater Permitting Section Bureau of Water SC Department of Health and Environmental Control 2600 Bull Street Columbia, SC 29201 803-898-4186 803-898-4095 FAX vickermg@dhec.sc.gov Subject: Fwd: NC0004812 Phan Yarns permit From: "Michael Montebello' <MONTEBMJ@dhec.sc.gov> Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 10:44:03 -0400 To: "Melinda Vickers" <VICKERMG@dhec.sc.gov> CC: "JeffDeBessonet" <DEBESSJP@dhec.sc.gov> Melinda, This is the NC permit I indicated needed a review for NCDEM. I always copy Marshall on my comments. Thanks Mike 1 of 3 6/6/2006 5:15 PM NC0004812 Pharr Yarns permit Subject: NC0004812 Pharr Yarns permit From: Jackie Nowell <jackie.nowell@ncmail.net> Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 1.6:03:00 -0400 To: Michael Montebello <MONTEBMJ@dhec.sc.gov>, giffinma@dhec.sc.gov Michael, per the request in the April 27 letter from Mihir Mehta regarding the subject facility. The permit modification is for the revision of limits for sulfide, phenols, and total chromium based on effluent guidelines for 40 CFR 410.70 Stock and Yarn Finishing Subcategory. Attached is the draft cover letter, draft permit and factsheet for Pharr Yarns. Pharr Yarns discharges into the South Fork Catawba River with a 7Q10 of 125 cfs and an average flow of 808 cfs. At 0.5 MGD, Pharr Yarns has an instream waste concentration of 0.6 % . At the expansion flow of 1 MGD, the instream waste concentration is 1.2 %. The distance from the discharge point to the mouth of the South Fork Catawba River where it enters the Catawba River is approximately 8.5 miles. North Carolina has an action level standard for copper of 7 ug/1 and the allowable copper concentrations for Pharr Yarns at the end of pipe would be 1136 ug/1 at 0.5 MGD and 572 ug/1 at 1.0 MGD. If the SC standard for copper of 2.9 ug/1 is applied, the allowable concentration for copper at 0.5 MGD is 471 ug/l, and at 1.0 MGD, the allowable concentration for copper is 237 ug/l. There was one value for copper of 41 ug/l reported in the pollutant analysis done in Dec. 2004. This data value is substantially less than the allowable concentrations and would seem to indicate that copper is not a pollutant of concern for Pharr Yarns. In addition, Pharr Yarns has consistently passed its whole effluent toxicity test. Regarding fecal coliform, the recommended and existing limitations in the Pharr Yarns permit are 200/100ml (monthly average) and 400/100ml (daily maximum). Please contact me if there are any further questions regarding the modification of the Pharr Yarns permit. ,4812-Fact Sheet-mod2006.doc i Content -Type: application/msword i = Content -Encoding: base64 ' Content -Type: application/msword 4812 draftmodltr042006.doc Content -Encoding: base64 Content -Type: application/msword 14812 mod-permit-2006.doc ' Content -Encoding: base64 1 of 1 6/6/2006 9:58 AM REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS Pharr Yarns NC0004812 Time Period 12/8/2004 Qw (MGD) 0.5 WWTP Class III 7Q10S (cls) 125 /WC (%) ®7Q10S 0.6162 701OW(cls) 228 ® 701OW 0.3388 3002 (cis) 310 @ 3002 0.2494 Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cis) 808 @ QA 0.0958 Rec'ving Stream South Forks Catawba River Stream Class WS-V Outfall 1 Ow = 0.5 MGD STANDARDS & PARAMETER TYPE CRITERIA (2) POL Units REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS RECOMMENDED ACTION (1) NCWQS/ iS FAV/ n iDet Mer Pied LW Allowable Cw ' chronic Acute • Acute: WA Arsenic C 50 ug/L 1 0 WA fir 3 ;'' '� _ �'•'• Note: n<12 ...... _ Chronic: 52,179 ' Limited data set Acute: WA Beryllium C 6.5 uglL 1 0 WA w Note: n<12 _ Chronic: 6,783: - ,- '� Limited data set Acute: 15 Cadmium NC 2 15 uglL 1 0 WA - Note: n<12 Chronic: 325 r Limited data set . s �,,; < .`' I-.,, Acute: 1,02.2. Chromium NC 50 1,022 uglL 1 1 WA Note: n<12 Chronic: 8,115 Limited data set , n-aw'_�. ,,. Acute: 7 Copper NC 2.9 AL 7.3 ug/L 1 1 WA x_r�, , , g s Note: n<12 _ _ _ _ Chronic: 471 _ _ Limited data set I Acute: 22 Cyanide NC 5 N 22 10 ug/L 1 0 WA _ Note: n<12 _ _ Chronic: 811 Limited data set +`s Acute: WA Fluoride NC 1,800 u L: 0 0 WA y ...... _ Chronic: 292123 ------- XY` x x •,. „ ' Acute: 34 Lead NC 25 N 33.8 ug/L 1 0 WA Note: n<12 ,. _ _ _ Chronic: 4 057 + '� • Limited data set ' Acute: WA x' ;,N,, t Mercury NC 12 ng/L 1 0 WA' Note: n<12 Chronic: 1,947 Limited data set- • Acute: N/A Molybdenum A 3,500 ug/L 1 1 WA , 1s ...a' s :'� .. z �.. Note: n<12 _ _ _ _ Chronic: 1,403.500 Limited data set Acute: 261 Nickel NC 88 261 ug/L 1 0 WA hE g r� ?_- Nate: n<12 _ _ _ _ __ Chronic: 14,282 '' ' Limited data set '? Acute: WA _I Phenols A 1 N ug/L 0 0 WA Chronic: Acute: 56 `' x Selenium NC 5.0 56 ug/L 1 0 WA ,4 ,, „„ ; Note: n<12 _ _ _ Chronic: 611 �- c Limited data set Acute: 1 - Silver NC 0.06 AL 1.23 ug/L 1 0 WA Note: n<12 ............. Chronic: 10 _ _ Limited data set Acute: 67 Zinc NC 50 AL 67 ug/L 1 1 WA '"� Note: n<12 _ _ __ Chr0nlc: 8 115 _ _ _ , - Limited data set a Legend: " Freshwater Discharge C = Carcinogenic NC = Non -carcinogenic A= Aesthetic npdesrpa 2004031,rpa 5/22/2006 NGIle < REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS Pharr Yarns Outfall 1 NCO004812 Ow = 0.5 MW Time Pel 12/8/2004 Qw S OD)(da) 0.5 %)0 70M4s III Ale- / �j />n J7L / ]OfOS (ds) 125 IWC (%)O7OfOS 0.6162 /(/L "/�J T0`'O p1.. ]O002 (ds) 310 O 7 3 0W 0.3388 2494 ]f 3002 (ds) 310 03002 0.2494 /w,"•'�' Avg. Stream Flow, CA (de) 808 O CA 0.0958 RecViing Stream South Forks Catawba River Stream Class all / STANDARDS A PARAMETER TYPE CRRERIA(2) POL Units REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS RECOMMENDED ACTION (1) fficli NFAV1 IAL YURM LY AbeMYGr Done Acaa All WA Arsenic C 50 rol 1 0 WA Note: ll Chronic: W.179_-- Limited Bats M Mute: WA Beryllium C (is ugVL 1 0 WA _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Note: n< 22 Chronic: B,T83 Limited dale M Acute: 15 Cadmium NC 2 15 u04 1 0 WA Note: n<12 _ Chiral --925 — Limited data am Addle; irm Chromium NC 50 1,022 Ug'L 1 1 WA Note: n<t2 Chronic: 8,115 Limited MY M Acute: ] Copper NC T AL 7.3 ul 1 1 WA Note: n<12 __ CNronk: 1, 138 Limited tleY M Acute: 22 Cyanide NC 5 N 22 10 ugh 1 0 WA Note: n<12 _ __ _ Ellronk: 811 Limited Bats M Acute: WA Fluoride NC 1 eau uq4 0 0 WA Chronic: 29&123 Acute: 34 Lead NC 25 N 33.8 a 'L 1 0 WA Note: n<12 Chmi 4,057 Llmkad dsts ad Acids: WA Mercury NC 12 uVL 1 0 WA Note: n42 Chronic: 1,84] Limited dsM M Acute: WA Molybdenum A 3,500 u,L 1 1 WA Neal n<12 Chronic: 1,403.500 Limited date M Ache: 281 Nickel NC 88 261 u,L I 0 WA Note: n<12 Chrank: 14,282 Limited dsts M Adults: WA Phenols A 1 N uryL 0 0 WA Chronic: 401 Acute: W Selenium NC 5.0 56 ul 1 a WA Note: n<12 Chronic: 811 Limited Nts M Al 1 Silver NC ON AL 1.23 ug4 1 0 WA Note: n<l2 _ _ CMOMc:.—.1U — —'_._._._._._._______._._____ Limited dots M Mute: 6] Zinc NC _ i AL 67 ul I 1 WA Note: n<12 _ Chronic: 8 Limited dsla M Legend: '• Freshwater Discharge C=Canametienk A Aesthetic genic A=Aesmelk nodes ma 2004031, ma 5TV2006 REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS Pharr Yarns Outfall 1 NC0004812 Qw =1 MGD Time Period 12/8/2004 Qw (MGD) 1 WWTP Class III 7010S (cis) 125 IWC (%) ® 7010S 1.2248 7Q10W (cis) 228 ® 7Q10W 0.6752 3002 (cfs) 310 ® 30Q2 0.4975 Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cfs) 808 ® QA 0.1915 Rec'ving Stream South Forks Catawba River Stream Class WS-V STANDARDS & PARAMETER TYPE CRITERIA (2) POL Units REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS RECOMMENDED ACTION (t) Nhrank 1AcuteFAV n I&L Mal Pmd Cw Allowable Cw Cbronfe Acute Acute: WA Arsenic C 50 ug/L 1 0 WA Note: n<12 Chronic: 26,115 ------------- s Limited data set Acute: WA Beryllium C 6.5 ug/L 1 0 WA Note: n<12 Chronic: 3,395 Limited data set `.✓ '> Acute: 15 Cadmium NC 2 15 ug/L 1 0 WA Nate: n<12 Chronic: 163 Limited data set" _ Acute: 1,022 ` Chromium NC 50 1,022 ug/L 1 1 WA ...... _ _ _ _ _ ---- Note: n<12 Chronic: 4,082 - Limited data set a Acute: 7 Copper NC 7 AL 7.3 ug/L 1 1 WA Note: n<12 Chronic: 572 Limited data set Acute: 22 Cyanide NC 5 N 22 10 ug/L 1 0 N/A Note: n<72 Chronic: 408 • Limited data set "� _ '' " - Acute: WA Fluoride NC 1,800 ug/L 0 0 WA _ _ Chronic: _ _ __ 146,961 _ __ Acute: 34 Lead NC 25 N 33.8 ug/L 1 0 WA Note: n<12 Chronic: _ _ _ 2,041 _ ------------------------- Limited data set=i Acute: WA Mercury NC 12 ng/L 1 0 WA Note: n<12 Chronic: __ _ __ 980 Limited data set - - -"- Acute: WA '•� Molybdenum A 3,500 ug/L 1 1 WA Note: n<12 Chronic: 703,500 '.. _ _ Limited data set Acute: 261 Nickel NC 88 261 ug/L 1 0 WA Note: n<12 Chronic: 7,165 Limited data set Acute: WA , Phenols A 1 N ug/L 0 0 WA �' _ _ Chronic: _ _ _ 201 c Acute: 56 Selenium NC 5.0 56 ug/L 1 0 N/A _ _ __ _ _ _ Note: n<12 Chronic: 408 - Limited data set Acute: 1 Silver NC 0.06 AL 1.23 ug/L 1 0 WA Note: n<12 Chronic: 5. ? Limited data set Acute: 67 ° Zinc NC 50 AL 67 ug/L 1 1 WA Note: n<12 Chronic: __ _____ _ _ Limited data set - Legend: •• Freshwater Discharge C = Carcinogenic NC = Non -carcinogenic A = Aesthetic npdes rpa 2004031, rpa 5/22/2006 REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS Pharr Yarns Outfall 1 NC0004812 aW = 0.5 MGD Time Period 12)8n004 Qw (MOO) 0.5 7010s lots) 125 WWTP ass III /WC (%)0%)O7070f0,S 0.6162 �� 7 30ap (cfs) 310 3001 (ds) 310 0 70/0 t 0.3388 O 3002 0.2494 Avg. Stratum Flow, OA (Cls) 808 O OA 0.0958 RwV#)g Stream South Forks Catawba River Stream Class WS-V STANDARDS e PARAMETER TYPE CRITERIA 2 POL Units REASONABLE POTENTbL RESULTS RECOMMENDED ACTION NNFAV/ 'Del IIVRd Qr A4a�Ne CN III mnk Cmadr A[eN Mule: WA Arsenic C 50 ug/L 1 0 WA Nob: n<12 hunk:_ C521T9 —.-----.—.—.—.—.—.---.—.—.—.—_ Limited Wb M Mule: WA Beryllium C 6.5 uyL t 0 WA Note: n<12 Chronic:_ B,T83 — — — --- — — — — — --- — _--- Llmlted deb M Mule: 15 Cadmium NC 15 ug/L 1 0 WA Note: ll Chronic:.-325— Limited deb set Mule: I'm Chromium NC 50 1,022 ug/L 1 1 WA Note: n<12 _ Chronic: 8.116 --_--------------------------- Limited Mb M Mute: 7 Copper NO Tfl AL 7.3 ul 1 1 WA Now: n<12 Chunk: 471— _._.—.—._.—.—._.—.—.—._.—.—.— Llmited dab M MUb: 22 Cyanide NC 5 N n 10 ug/L 1 0 WA Note: n<12 Chronic: 611— ----------------------- umaM deb M AMe: WA Fluoride NC 1.30a ug/L 0 0 WA Chronic: 292,123 Mute: 34 Lead NC 25 N W.8 not. 1 0 WA Nob: n02 _ Chronic: 4,087 umibd deb M Mule: WA Mercury NC 12 ngL 1 0 WA Nob: n<12 Chronic: 1,M7 Limited dMe M MUM: WA Molybdenum A 3.500 ug/L I 1 WA Note: n<12 Limited deb M Mule: 261 Nickel NC 88 261 ug4 1 0 WA Note: n<12 Limited deb eel rends: WA Phenols A 1 N ugA. 0 0 WA Cnronk:__—Z _ ____._____._._______._._.___._ Mule: W Selenium NC SO 66 uq4 1 0 WA Nob: n<12 _ Cheek: Bit Limited dab M Mute: i Sliver NC 0.06 AL 1.23 ugL 1 0 WA Note: n<12 Chronic:---10— Limited deb M Mute: 67 Zinc NC 50 AL 67 1 1 WA 1 JuA NMe: n<12 _ Chrmec: 8,115 ------- _------------------------- Limied deb M Legerb: " FrerhnW 01whavpr C=Carchwgenic NC=Noncamarlogenk A=Attainable npdes ma 2004031, rpe 8/2P 2006 REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS Pharr Yarns NC0004812 Time Period 12/8/2004 Qw (MGD) 1 WWTP Class III 701OS (cls) 125 IWC (%) @ 7Q10S 1.2248 7Q10W (c/s) 228 ® 7Q10W 0.6752 30Q2 (c/s) 310 @ 3OQ2 0.4975 Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cls) 808 ® QA 0.1915 Rec'ving Stream South Forks Catawba River Stream Class WS-V Outfall 1 Ow =1 MGD STANDARDS & PARAMETER TYPE CRITERIA (2) POL Units REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS RECOMMENDED ACTION No WQS1 %FAVr n BDeL Mar Prod Llv Allowable Cw (1) chronic Acute Acute: WA- x'. Arsenic C 50 ug/L 1 0 WA Note: n<12 Chronic: 26 115 x 7 Limited data set P,'.,x .�a.. 3�.y Acute: WA Beryllium C 6.5 ug/L, 1 0 WA 4��Yw c. Note: n<12 _ _ _ Chronic: 3,395 Limited data set „;";.,,„`'Tx..�.,.,$f Acute: 15 Cadmium NC 2 15 ug/L 1 0 WA s �r y„"`�; F:. ,.. '`,� `; ? � Note: n<12 _ _ _ _ Chronic: 163 Limited data set Acute: 1,022 �A ;Chromium NC 50 1,022 ug/L 1 1 WA _ F�. Note: n<12 _ _ _ Chronic: 4 082 Limited data set Acute: 7 ,rb, Copper NC 2.9 AL 7.3 ug/L 1 1 WA Note: n<12 Chronic: 237 Limited data set,. °'-a „x<r.�`:> ,. a, '�`" Acute: 22 a Cyanide NC 5 N 22 10 uglL 1 0 WA '> Note: n<12 _ _ Chronic: 408 Limited data set Acute: WA Fluoride NC 1,800 uglL 0 0 .WA Chronic: 146961xr "z y " Acute: 34 Lead NC 25 N 33.8 ug/L 1 0 WA - Note: n<12 ..................... Chronic: 2,041 Limited data set Acute: WA s Mercury NC, 12 ng/L 1 0 WA v Note: n<12 Chronic: 980 Limited data setfi� Acute: WA ° Molybdenum A 3,500 ug/L 1 1 WA r Note: n<12 Chronic: 703,500 Limited data set Acute: 261 1, Nickel NC 88 261 ug/L 1 0 WA ` _1, Note: n<12 Chronic: 7,185 ' Limited data set Acute: WA Phenols A 1 N ug/L 0 0 WA Chronic: 201�, r x .: �i t Acute: 58 Selenium NC 5.0 56 ug/L 1 0 WA Note: n<12 Chronic: 408 k -- 1. Limited data set FFk Acute: Silver NC 0.06. AL 1.23 ugtL 1 0 WA Note: n<12 Chronic: 5 7 s Limited data set z Zinc NC 50 AL 67 ug/L 1 1 WA Acute: 67� Note: n<12 Chronic: 4,082�'� ---------- Limited data set?' - Legend: " Freshwater Discharge C = Carcinogenic NC = Non -carcinogenic A = Aesthetic npdes rpa 2004031, rpa 5/22t2006 BOARD; Elizabeth M. Hagood Chairman Edwin H. Cooper, III Vice Chairman L Michael Blackmon Secretary April 27, 2006 D H E C I PAW �a NN PROMOTE PROTECT PROSPER C Ead Hinter, Commissioner Promoting and protecting the bealth of the pub& and the environment. Ms. Carolyn Bryant NC Division of Water Quality Environmental Management Commission/NPDES Unit 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 RE: Notification of Intent to Renew NPDES Wastewater Permits for Pharr Yarns (NC0004812), dated April 13, 2006. Dear Ms. Bryant: BOARD: Carl L Beazell Steven G. xisner Paul C Aughtry, III Coleman F. Bucki o se, MD We are submitting comments regarding the above proposed NPDES permit modification, which would continue the discharge of treated wastewater into the South Fork Catawba River. Proposed discharge volume information was not provided in the above notice. According to DHEC's latest approved 303(d) water quality assessment (2004), Lake Wylie is impaired by copper levels above the Mill Creek arm at the end of SC Road 557 (CW- 197). Also, the Catawba River is impaired by copper levels at SC Road 5 above Bowater (CW- 041). South Carolina's standard for copper is 2.9 ug/l. In addition, Lake Wylie (CW-027 located in the Crowders Creek arm at SC Highways 49 and 274) and the Catawba River (CW-014 at US Highway 21) are impaired by fecal colifonn bacteria. South Carolina's standards for fecal coliform in the Catawba River are "not to exceed a geometric mean of 200/100ml based on five day consecutive samples during any 30 day period; nor shall more than 10% of the total samples examined during any 30 day period exceed 400/100m1 " Please ensure that any permit modifications will not contribute to violations of South Carolina standards. Please send a copy of the draft permit modification and permit rationale to Mike Montebello, South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC), Bureau of Water, 2600 Bull St., Columbia, South Carolina 29201. Thank you for considering these comments when reviewing, and modifying this permit. If you need more information, please contact Mark Giffin at (803) 898-4203 or giffiiiina@dhec.sc.gov for assistance. Sincerely, /VO MdA Mihir Mehta P.E.,, Manager Watersheds and Planning Section MM:MAG cc: Mark Giffin Rheta Geddings Mike Montebello Gina Fonzi, EPA M AY - 9 2006 iI i SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL 2600 Bull Street • Columbia, SC 29201 • Phone: (803) 898-3432 • w .scdhecgov TEXTILE EFFLUENT LIMITS SPREADSHEET PERMIT NO: N00004812 PERMITTEE: PHARR YARNS, INC. COUNTY: GASTON PERMITTED FLOW: 0.5 MGD BASED ON 40CFR410.70 SUBPART G STOCK AND YARN FINISHING SUBCATEGORY PRODUCTION DATA: DAILY MAX. 24000 according to EPA recommendation MONTHLY AVG. 24000 FROM 40CFR 410.70 SUBPART G (all limits in IbS11000 Ibs) 6.8 84.6 17.4 e 0.24 )I 0.12 Chromium 0.12 LIMITS POLLUTANT DAILY MAX AVERAGE �.13 lip 600 1/0 POD 1 •;MONTHLY 81.6 COD S B3B:4" 4 1015.2 208.89 / AA ,A� T 5. � 2. 2 21uoy'rJ� r Sulfide Phenol 9 1.4 pap ^J Total Chromium 2.9 1.4 re �C pH mList be een betw6 and 9 at all tmes F Y "1't FOR PHARR YARNS, ONL� 27% OF FLOW IS DOMESTIC WASTE IS 73%, Gop is PROCESS FLOW ADJUST L tT$ ACCORDINGLY: ADD ALLOCATION FOR THAT POLLUTANT DAILY M ( _ HLY AVERAGE POLLUTANT DAILY MAX MONTHLY AVERAG BOOS 137.0 91. .�30Y f'31 K 0,S d,�3 BODS 4. 22.0 COD -_ 548.2 274.1 TSS .0 91.3 5 112. 56.4 COD 301,3659 200..9'1/06 Sulfide 1. 0.8 1* 4 Phenol 0. 0.4 0.q 131-tF I(,t 7f.Tdf L,L Chromiu /otal pH m be between 6 and 9 at all times 1 v'd_ 1 r AL LIMITS (lb/da POLLUTANT AI BOOS MONTHLY AVERAGE 181.0 113.4 ' original BOD limits were 390 lb/day (monthly ave) COD 849. 475.0 and 780 Ib/day (daily max), so these limits are still TSS 2 147.7 protective of DO Sulfide 2.3 0.8 Phenol 1.2 0.4 Total Chromium H I 1.2 must be and gat all 0.4 1�3.za�o,27 7?Z e rl A,16-0 7, S z6 0 -z c/3O —CV, c� lr y > ri2 A l A671 `/ � f 1 `f7, CIV Liz 3- 8 ��lt 6 6 C>, 1, Z Sc J-/),� Fw C'.N C- CC L--__--_ ..c, _V7— /G ; .� Al 2.4Ae l.S/4 op" 114 ; ! jvlhh, 6095' /(/I / P/ flP/2, f, 8 /! !+w TEXTILE EFFLUENT LIMITS SPREADSHEET PERMIT NO: NC0004812 PERMITTEE: PHARR YARNS, INC. COUNTY: GASTON PERMITTED FLOW: 0.5 MGD BASED ON 40CFR410.70 SUBPART G STOCK AND YARN FINISHING SUBCATEGORY PRODUCTION DATA: DAILY MAX. 24000 according to EPA recommendation MONTHLY AVG. 24000 MUM 4Di l-K 41V./V W15FAKI U tau emus In IDs/1WU IDS) POLLUTANT DAILY MAX MONTHLY AVERAGE BODS 6.8 3.4 COD 84.6 42.3 S 17.4 8.7 Sulfide 0.24 0.12 Phenol 0.12 0.06 Total Chromium 0.12 0.06 PH must be between 6 and 9 at all times LIMITS POLLUTANT DAILY MAX MONTHLY AVM. BOD5 163.2 81.6 COD 2030.4 1015.2 S 417.6 208.8 Sulfide 5.8 2.9 Phenol 2.9 1.4 Total Chromium 2.9 1.4 H must be bets 6 and 9 at all times FOR PHARR YARNS, ONLY 27% OF FLOW IS PROCESS FLOW ADJUST LIMITS ACCORDINGLY: POLLUTANT DAILY MAX MONTHLY AVERAGE GODS 44.1 22.0 COD 548.2 274.1 SS 112.8 56.4 Sulfide 1.6 0.8 Phenol 0.8 0.4 Total Chromium 0.8 0.4 H must be between 6 and 9 at all times i 181.0 849.6 249.7 e 2.3 DI 1.2 Chromium 1.2 DOMESTIC WASTE IS 73%, ADD ALLOCATION FOR THAT MAX AVERAG IPBOLCILUTANT (DAILY IMONTHLY 91 3I COD 301.3659 200.9106 original BOD limits were 390 lb/day (monthly ave) nd 780 lb/day (daily max), so these limits are still rotective of DO Location: S Fork Catawba R at NC 7 at McAdenville Station: C6500000 Classification: WS-V Subbasin: CTB36 Period: 9/16/1997 to 81132002 <or> Num. Eval. Eval. Level Percentiles Parameter N <R.L. Level N % Min. 10 25 50 75 90 Max Field Dissolved Oxygen 59 0 <4 0 0.0 5.2 7.1 7.7 9.2 10.9 12.4 14.0 (DO; mg/L) <5 0 0.0 Conductivity 59 na 53 95 159 195 250 298 430 Temperature ("C) 59 na 2 7 10 16 23 26 28 PH(s.u.) 59 na <6 0 0.0 6.5 7.3 74 7.5 7.7 7.9 8.3 >9 0 0.0 Otter (m9IL) Total Residue 32 0 >500 1 48 89 120 140 180 199 1500 TSS 44 2 >10 20 45.5 1 4 6 10 14 26 60 >20 6 13.6 Chloride 35 0 >250 0 0.0 5 9 15 20 30 37 54 Turbidity (NTU) 59 0 >50 3 5.1 5 6 8 10 14 28 800 >25 9 15.3 >10 26 "A Nutrients (mg/L) NH3 as N 56 3 0.01 0.03 0.06 0.10 0.14 0.26 0.56 TKN as N 54 0 0.20 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.54 0.71 1.10 NO2+NO3 as N 56 0 >10 0 0.0 0.42 0.66 0.77 0.94 1.10 1.30 1.90 Total Phosphorus 57 3 >0.05 66 98.2 0.04 0.10 0.13 0.18 0.23 0.28 1.70 Metals (pgfL) Aluminum (AI) 44 0 110 245 365 585 930 1810 37000 Arsenic (As) 44 44 >50 0 0.0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Cadmium (Cd) 44 44 >2 0 0.0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Chromium (Cr) 44 43 >50 0 0.0 25 25 25 25 25 25 26 Copper (Cu) 44 8 >7 5 11.4 2 2 2 3 4 9 350 Iron (Fe) 44 0 >1000 25 56.8 460 670 785 1100 1300 1800 28000 Lead (Pb) 44 43 >25 1 2.3 10 10 10 10 10 10 35 Manganese (Mn) 44 0 >200 1 2.3 30 42 52 68 85 99 1000 Mercury (Hg) 44 44 >0.012 0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Nickel (Ni) 44 43 >25 0 0.0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Zinc (Zn) 44 21 >50 2 4.5 10 10 10 11 17 40 120 Bacteria (H700 ml) -- Fecalcol"dorm 56 N>200=8 N>400=4 %>400--7.1 Geometric mean=63.1 Abbreviations: N = number of samples; Num. < R.L. = number < Reporting Level; < or > refers to "less than or greater than": TSS = Total Suspended Solids; conductivity measured as pmhos/cm; na = not applicable. Evaluation Levels (Eval. Level) are presented to facilitate review. Some levels refer to water quality standards; others may be used for ecological or Action Level review. NCDENR, Division of Water Quality Basinwide Assessment Report - Catawba River Basin - June 2003 199 Catawba Cr at SR 2302 at NC -SC State Location: Line Station: C7400000 Classification: C Subbasin: CTB37 Period: 9/11/1997 to 8128/2002 <or> Num. Eval. EvaL Level Percentiles Parameter N < R.L. Level N % Min. 10 25 50 75 90 Max. Field Dissolved Oxygen 55 0 <4 0 0.0 4.2 6.7 8.0 9.2 10.2 11.1 13.6 (DO; mg1Q <5 1 1.8 Conductivity 55 na 65 90 108 121 132 140 151 Temperature (°C) 55 na 8 10 15 22 28 31 34 pH (s.u.) 53 na <6 0 0.0 6.8 7.0 7.3 7.6 8.7 8.9 9.2 >9 4 7.5 Other (mg1Q Total Residue 9 0 65 74 86 91 96 100 100 TSS 42 1 >10 1 2.4 1 2 3 4 5 8 11 >20 0 0.0 Chloride 8 0 >230 0 0.0 7 8 9 11 12 14 15 Turbidity (NTU) 55 0 >50 0 0.0 2 3 4 5 7 10 21 >25 0 0.0 >10 5 9.1 Nutrients (mg/L) NH, as N 43 14 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.05 0.09 0.12 0.43 TKN as N 43 1 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.49 0.70 NO2+NO3 as N 43 10 >10 0 0.0 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.16 0.28 0.35 0.58 Total Phosphorus 43 2 >0.05 13 30.2 0.01 0.03 0.03 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.10 Metals (pg/L) Aluminum (AI) 42 0 54 120 143 260 388 459 1400 Arsenic (As) 42 42 >50 0 0.0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Cadmium (Cd) 42 42 >2 0 0.0 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Chromium (Cr) 42 42 >50 0 0.0 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Copper(Cu) 42 2 >7 8 19.0 2 2 4 5 6 10 13 Iron (Fe) 42 0 >1000 0 0.0 84 141 175 275 398 506 990 Lead (Pb) 42 42 >25 0 0.0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Manganese (Mn) 11 0 15 23 26 36 43 52 91 Mercury (Hg) 42 42 >0.012 0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 Nickel (Ni) 42 42 >88 0 0.0 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 Zinc (Zn) 42 27 >50 2 4.8 10 10 10 10 15 22 69 Bacteria (#/100 ml) --------------------- ------------- -- "- Fecal coliform 52 N>200.0 N>400=0 %>400=0.0 Geometric mean=8.9 Abbreviations: N = number of samples; Num. < R.L. = number < Reporting Level; < or > refers to less than or greater than"; TSS = Total Suspended Solids; conductivity measured as pmhoslan; na = not applicable. Evaluation Levels (Eval. Level) are presented to facilitate review. Some levels refer to water quality standards; others may be used for ecological or Action Level review. NCDENR, Division of Water Quality Basimrids Assessment Report - Catawba River Basin - June 2003 201 12-4y"1 'Arr p-6J( PharrPolomar Pharr Yarns, Inc. • Pharr International, Inc P.O. Box 1939 Sylvan Yarn Systems, Inc. 100 Main Street McAdenville, K 28101-1939 Telephone:704/824-3551 Facsimile: 704/824-0072 February 15, 2006 Mr. Sergei Chemikov, Ph.D. NPDES Unit NC Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, N.C. 27699 P AR R Subject: NPDES Permit No. NC0004812 YARN 8 Pharr Yarns, Inc. McAdenville WWTP Dear Mr. Chernikov: 1ti' FE3 27 ZOO You may be aware that Pharr Yarns has been experiencing considerable difficulty maintaining compliance with the current permit effluent limitations for sulfides. This permit, issued March 1, 2005, contains sulfide limits of 0.8 lb/day, monthly average, and 2.3 lb/day, daily maximum. Based on our experience, we have found that, if we have any detectable sulfide concentrations in our effluent, the resulting calculated mass loadings (lb/day) will exceed the mass effluent limits. Therefore, we have been reviewing this matter on several fronts to get a better understanding of how these limits were derived. In the course of this review, we have come across some interesting information that our consultant, Mr. J. Thurman Horne, P.E. (Horizon Engineering & Consulting, Inc.) discussed with you by phone on February 14, 2006. It is my understanding that, after discussing this matter with Mr. Home, you agreed that it appears that the effluent limits for sulfide, phenol and total chromium, may have been assigned incorrectly in the permit due to a flaw in the derivation of the limits, and that this matter should be reviewed. The key to this problem appears to be in the "Textile Effluent Limits Spreadsheet" that was included with the Fact Sheet when the draft permit was first developed and sent to us by letter dated November 24, 2004 (copy attached.) As you and Mr. Home have discussed, the error appears near the bottom of the first page of the spreadsheet, where calculations are made to allow for the contribution of BODS, TSS and COD attributable to the domestic portion of the wastewater flow. The calculations correctly adjust the calculated BODS, TSS and COD limits that were derived from the federal guideline (40 CFR 410.70 Subpart G) to account for the contribution of these constituents from the domestic portion of the wastewater. The problem is that, in the course of making these calculations, it appears that a mistake was made wherein the limits calculated based on the federal guidelines for sulfides, phenol and total chromium, were reduced to 27 % of the allowable limit. Whereas compliance with this limit is determined by multiplying the concentration of the effluent times the total flow (combined process and domestic wastewater) to determine the mass effluent concentration, Pharr Yarns is currently being unfairly deprived of the full federally allowable mass limits for sulfides, phenol and total chromium. Page 2 The limits for sulfides, phenol and ti guidelines, should not have been reduced Therefore, the correct limits for these con Daily Max. Sulfides 8.7 Phenol 4.3 Total chromium 4.3 Based on: Maximum daily production = 36,200 Monthly average production = Chernikov to Mike Church dated Federal Guidelines: Daily maximum Sulfide 0.24lb/10001bs Phenol 0,12 lb/1000 Is Totalchromium 0.12 lb/1000 lbs Just for information purposes and as a s copy of the Fact Sheet from 1996 which that time, were derived from the federal described. Pharr Yarns is hereby requesting that the that the above limitp for sulfides, phenol based on consideration of the above infori We appreciate your assistance and con; information is sufficient but, if you have or if there are any matters you need to di (704-823 -23 10) or Mr. J. Thurman Horne, 704-788-4455.) Sincerely, ;6��� � � � Mike Church Pharr Yarns Environmental Engineer Cc: Rex Gleason (P.E. (NC DWQ MRO) Mike Parker (NC DWQ — MRO J. Therman Home (P.E. Horizon Frank Lampke (Space Dye Plant chromium, as derived from the federal should be the correct limits for our permit. :nts should be: Monthly Avg. (lb/day) 2.9 1.4 1.4 lb/day (Note: See attached email from Sergei y 13, 2005) Monthly Average 0.12 lb/10001bs 0.06 lb/10001bs 0.06 lb/10001bs oint of reference, we have attached a the former effluent limits assigned at in the correct manner which we have ent permit be amended or revised to reflect total chromium are in effect. We trust that, ►n, you will act favorably on this request. �ideration of this matter. We hope that this any questions, need any additional information, scuss, please do not hesitate to contact myself P.E. (Horizon Engineering & Consulting, Inc., jng & Consulting, Inc.) 02/15/06 11:38 HORIZON ENGINEERING & i TING 4 PHARR YARNS TRAF NO.706 904 Page 1 of l We Chu From: SeWl CherNkov <sergeLchemikovg To: Sent: <rnike.church@rnhdspring.com> Attach: Thursday, January 13, 2005 US AM 4812-effluent 2005.doc Subject: new effluent limits Mike, iil.net> I have received -your letter with request to consider potential increase in production. Accordingto your letter, it is expected that production will increase 30% in 2005 compared to 2004. Production in 2004 was 19,499 lb/day (monthly average). Therefore, 2005 production level will be 25,348 lb/day. EPA was not willing to accept thi� number, after lengthy negotiation I was able to achieve their consepsus at the 24,000 lb/day and recalculated permit limits. Attached is the file with the new limits. please let me know if these numbers are acceptable. I also had to change methodology for calculating Daily Max. Limits due to EPA objections. Sergei 0 k'iLl-u-- tt 1/13/05 02%15i06 11:38 HORIZON ENGINEERING & CONSULTING 4 PHARR YARNS TRRF NU. '706 IJU State of North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Division of Water Quality Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary Alan W. Klimek, RE., Director W. I IL- Church Environmental Engineer Pharr Yams 100 Main St. McAdeuville, North Carolina 28101 Dear Mr. Church; '+��:. ... �. � - .. '•ii ��9%4 as 1 GOV 2 4 200A t004 NCDENR ENVIRONMENT AND N R1.JRAL ResouRCE5 /Subject: Draft NPDES Permit Permit NC0004812 Pharr Yarns WWrP Gaston County Enclosed with this letter is a copy of the draft permit for your f"ry. Please review the draft very carefully to ensure thorough understanding of the conditions and requirements it contains. The draft pemlit contains the following significant changes from your current permit: • The daily maxinnun total residual chlorine (TRC) limit has been added to the permit. See the attached total residual chlorine policy memo for details. The facility is allowed 18 months from the effective date of the permit to comply with the total residual chlorine limit. This time period is Loved in order for the facility to budget and design/construct the dechlorination and /or alternative disinfection systems. • Limits for BOD, ODD, TSS and sulfide were changed due to the changes in production volume. Please submit any comments to me no later than thirty days following your receipt of the draft. Comments should be sent to the address listed at the bottom of this page. If no adverse comments are received from the 005.ublic or from you, this permit will hkely be issued in early January, with an effective date of Febnrvy 1, If you have any questions or conumnts concerning this draft permit, contact me at the telephone number or e-mail address listed at the bottom of the previous page. CC: NPDES Files Mooresville Regional Office / Water Quality Section Pretreatment Unit Aquatic ToxicologyUtut Mr. Roosevelt Childress, EPA Region IV DEH NPDES Unit, 1617 Mail Service Center. Raleigh, North Carolina 27699 An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Actlon Employer S rely, ergei Cherrtilwv, Ph.D. NPDES Unit 919 733.5083, extension 594 (fax) 919733.0719 Sergei.chemikov® ncmail. net 0�2/1b/0b 11:38 HORIZON ENGINEERING 8 CONSULTING 4 PHARR YARNS TRAF TEXTILE EFFLUENT LIMITS SPREADSHEET PERMIT NO: NCOOD4812 PERMITTEE: PHARR YARNS, INC. COUNTY: GASTON PERMITTED FLOW: 1 MGD PRODUCTION DATA in Ibs/day : DAILY MAX. 36200 MONTHLY AVG. 19499 FROM 40CFR 410.70 SUBPART G (all limits In Ibs/1000 Ibs) BOD5 6.8 3.4 COD 134.6 42.3 TSS 17.4 B.7 Sulfide 0.24 0.12 Phenol 0.12 0.06 Total Chromium 0.12 0.06 pH must be between 6 and 9 at au dies LIMITS BUDS 246.2 66.3 COD 3062.5 824.8 TSS 629.9 169.6 Sulfide 8.7 2.3 Phenol 4.3 1.2 Total Chromium 4.3 1.2 pH I must tie behmen 6 and 9 at all fines FOR PHARR YARNS, ONLY 27% OF FLOW IS lrcwcaa rl.Vry ADJUST LIMITS ACCORDINGLY BODS 68.5 t 7.9 COD 826.9 222.7 SS 170.1 45.8 Sulfide 2.3 0.6 Phenol 1.2 0.3 Total Chromium 1.2 0.3 PH must be between 6 and 9 at all bores 1430.7 444.0 a 2.3 01 1.2 Chromium 1.2 must be between 6 and 9 at ail NO.706 BASED ON 40CFR410.70 SUBPART G STOCK AND YARN FINISHING SUBCATEGUP DOMESTIC WASTE I5 73%, ADD ALLOCATION FOR THAI BOD5 274.0 182.6 IT -SS 274.0 182.6 CODS 602.7318 401.8212 I I I 200.5 ' original BOO limits were 390 lb/day (monthly ave) 624.5 and 780 lb/clay (daily max), so these limits are still 228.4protective of DO in8 L 9 ��.5 02/15/06 11:38 HORIZON ENGINEERING & r V TEXTILE EFFLUENT LIMITS SPREADSHEET PERMIT NO: NC0004812 PERMITTEE: PHARR YARNS, INC. COUNTY: GASTON PERMr TED FLOW: 015 MGD PRODUCTION DATA: 40CFR 410.70 SUBPART G all limits In Ibs/1000 L waw 5.8 COD 84.6 TSS 17.4 1 Sulfide 0.24 Phenol 0.12 Total Chromium 0,12 PH must be between 6 and 9 at all tines LIMITS 8.7 0.112 t�uu 3062.5 82:.8 TSS 629.9 16 .6 Sulfide 8.7 i2l Phenol 4.3 1.2 Total Chromium 4.3 i.2 PH must be between 6 and 9 at all times FOR PHARR YARNS, ONLY 27CVo OF FLOW IS PROCESS FLOW ADJUST LIMITS ACCORDINGLY: Phenol Total Chromium pH FINAL LIMITS I Chromium tgblb 1 826.9 22 170,1 g 2,3 1.2 1.2 must be between 6 and 9 at all times TING 4 PHARR YARNS TRAF NO.706 P07 i BASED ON 40CFR410.70 SUBPART G STOCK AND YARN FINISHING SUBCA'TEGC i I I i i I i i i 1 I i I DOMESTIC WASTE IS 73%, { ADD ALLOCATION FOR THAT BODS 137.0 91.3 I SS I 137.0 91.311! COD 301,3659 � 200.9106 203.4 109.2 ` original BOD limits were 390 lblday (monthly ave) 1128.2 421.6 and 780 lb/day (daily max), so these limits 307.1 13y.1 are still protective of DO 2.3 9-6 1.2 0.3 1.2 + 0.3 Y must be between 6 and 9 at all times k- NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION PERMIT NO.: NC0004812 PERMITTEE NAME: Pharr Yarns, Inc. FACILITY NAME: Pharr Yards Industrial WWTP Facility Status: Existing Pen -nit Status: Renewal Major Minor Pipe No.: 001 Design Capacity: 1.0 MGD COT 4 mr. Domestic (% of Flow):' 2 % UPIRQA OF _Industrial (% of Flow): 98 % Comments: NOTE change in ggideline calculations. _ 0o 51-t�D' �v2 j�u i w`o� BAT', i•(a-, B ESrJ RECEIVING STREAM: the South Fork Catawba River Class: WS-IU Sub -Basin: 03-08-36 Reference USGS Quad: 1714SE (please attach] County: Gaston Regional Office: Mooresville Regional Office Previous Exp. Date: 9/30/96 Treatment Plant Class: class In Classification changes within three miles: Requested by: /I R�))let Date: W-• Prepared by: Date: Reuie_we /�+r. f � Y ,'1•/ `��.�-�1_� _ Date:` N Modeler- Date Rec. # • �n SMIJ 5 3l lb �~C'cl i Q01 Drainage Area (mil } fG 3 tc Avg. Stream tlow (cfs): Jo 7Q l0 (cfs) /25 Winter 7Q10 (cfs)z 30Q2 (cfs) i ei Toxicity Limits: IWC % Acutucfc? co hisiream Monitoring: Pararrtcters � Q , '.,a . °l''' Upstream Location ,1,;. Downstream y Location lb".4 7 � Recommended Limits Monthly Avg- Daily Max. WQ or EL Flow (MGD): 1.0 BADS (lbs/day): 182 412 BAT -T-SS—(lbslda-Y)--�-38_ 9-3-2 DO (mgA): monitof monitor PH (SU): 6-9 6-9 COD (tbs/day): 1607 4145 BAT NH3-N (mg/1): monitor monitor Totat Chromium 2.3 5.9 BAT (lbs/day): Phenols (lbs/day): 2.3 5.9 BAT Sutfode (ibs/day): 4.6 11.8 BAT Fecal Cohforrn 200 400 WQ (/100mI) Residual Chlorine monitor monitor (pgA): Temperature (C): monitor monitor TN (m61): monitor monitor TP (rrig/1): monitor monitor Comments: _ o N 0 z m z M z rn rn z. RO z 0 . y D D M z D n z 0 m m