HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0004812_permit issuance_20061213 (2)NPDES DOCYNENT SCANNWIi COVER SHEET
NPDES Permit:
NC0004812
Document Typl!
Permit Issuance
Wasteload Allocation
Authorization to Construct (AtC)
Permit Modification
Compliance / Enforcement
Permit History
Date Range:
Correspondence
Document Date:
December 13, 2006
THIS DOCUMENT K PRINTED ON REUSE PAPER - IONORE ANY CONTENT ON THE
REVERSE SIDE
4,
r
�DF W A1'4 Q9
.Q
' r
> r
Mr. Mike Church
Environmental Engineer
Pharr Yarns, Inc.
100 Main Street
McAdenville, North Carolina 28101
Dear Mr. Church:
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carohna Department of Environment and Natural Resources
December 13, 2006
Subject: Issuance of NPDES Permit
Permit No. NC0004812
Pharr Yarns W WTP
Gaston County
Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director
Division of Water Quality
Division personnel have reviewed and approved your request for modification of the subject permit.
Accordingly, we are forwarding the attached NPDES discharge permit. This permit is issued pursuant to the
requirements of North Carolina General Statutes 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between North
Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency dated May 9, 1994 (or as subsequently amended).
Based on effluent guidelines from 40 CFR 410.70 Subpart G and a monthly average production value of
24000 lb/day (which will be used in the calculation of both daily maximum and monthly average limits), the
revised limits are as follows:
• Sulfide = 2.9 lbs/day (Monthly average); 5.8 Ibs/day (Daily maximum)
• Phenol =1.4 Ibs/day (Monthly average); 2.9 Ibs/day (Daily maximum)
• Total Chromium = 1.4 Ibs/day (Monthly average); 2.9 Ibs/day (Daily maximum)
If any parts, measurement frequencies or sampling requirements contained in this permit are
unacceptable to you, you have the right to an adjudicatory hearing upon written request within thirty (30) days
following receipt of this letter. This request must be in the form of a written petition, conforming to Chapter 150B of
the North Carolina General Statutes, and filed with the Office of Administrative Hearings (6714 Mail Service
Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-6714). Unless such demand is made, this decision shall be final and
binding.
Please note that this permit is not transferable except after notice to the Division. The Division may
require modification or revocation and reissuance of the permit. This permit does not affect the legal
requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by the Division of Water Quality or permits required
by the Division of Land Resources, the Coastal Area Management Act or any other Federal or Local
governmental permit that may be required. If you have any questions concerning this permit, please contact
Agyeman Adu-Poku at telephone number (919) 733-5083, extension 508.
Sincerely,
/✓ P"''�
W-42nfw—
. Klimek, P.E.
cc: Central File
NPDES File
Mooresville Regional Office/Surface Water Protection
Aquatic Toxicology Unit
DEH -f rl ��-na
North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail ServiceCenter Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone (919) 733-7015 Customer Service
Internet www.ncwateruualitv.ore Location: 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 Fax (919) 733.2496 1-877-623-6748
An Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer— 50% Recyded/10% Post Consumer Paper
Permit NC00048 f� , r
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY
PERMIT
TO DISCHARGE WASTEWATER UNDER THE
NATIONAL POLLUTANT _DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful
standards and' regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental
Management Commission, and the Fed-er^�Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, .
Pharr Yarns, Incorporated
is hereby authorized to discharge wastewater from a facility located at the
Pharr Yarns Wastewater Treatment Plant
147 Willow Drive
McAdenville
Gaston County
to receiving waters designated as the South Fork Catawba River in the Catawba
River Basin in accordance with effluent 'limitations, monitoring requirements, and
other conditions .set forth in Parts I, II, III and IV hereof.
This permit shall become effective January 1-, 2007.
This permit and authorization to discharge shall expire at midnight on May 31, 2010.
Signed this day- December 13, 2006.
�BI✓Aidn W. Klimek, P.E., Director
Division of Water Quality
By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission
Permit NC0004812
SUPPLEMENT TO PERMIT COVER SHEET
All previous NPDES Permits issued to this facility, whether for operation or discharge are hereby
revoked. As of this permit issuance, any previously issued permit bearing this number is no longer
effective. Therefore, the exclusive authority to operate and discharge from this facility arises under
. the permit conditions, requirements, terms, and provisions included herein.
Pharr Yarns, Inc. is hereby authorized to:
1. Continue to operate an existing 1.0 MGD' wastewater treatment facility for the
treatment of industrial and domestic wastewater that includes the following
components:
➢ Extended aeration basin
➢ Two clarifiers with alum and polymer addition
➢ Two return activated sludge pumps
➢ Three mixed media pressure filters
➢ Two filter pumps
Aerobic digester
➢ Sludge thickening tank
Dewatering belt press
Sludge ,storage and drying pad .
➢. 'Tablet type chlorinator
➢ Dual chlorine contactchamber '
This facility is located at the Pharr Yarns Wastewater Treatment Plant off Willow
Drive near McAderiville in - Gaston :County. .
2. Discharge from said treatment works at the location specified on the attached
map into the South Fork Catawba River, currently classified WS-V waters in the
Catawba River Basin.
Outfall 001'„
iuf nl w
ra)Ww
i r � - fir; ` r •ry( 1daY•
liea".yaayM4E"1'
V,.
Pharr Yarns WWTP
State Grld/Guad:
F 14 SE / MT Holly, NC
Permitted Flow:
1.0 MGD
Latitude:
35° 15' 40" N
Longitude:
81* 04' 39" W
Receivine Stream:
South Fork Catawba
Sub -Basin:
03-OS-34
Drainage Basin:
Catawba River Basin
Stream Class:
WS-V
a
V
�t
•tr..� ' '}i ill
�'•1 G
\ �Iv
'. rl
uw41= �T 41
..
' I 1 14r�h
i,
;}71tACN711C[ t �• �
Facility
Location
not to scale
NortT2 NPDES Permit No. NC0004812
Gaston Count
I
Permit NC0004812
k,
A. (1.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
During the period beginning on January 1, 2007 and lasting until the first time the monthly
average flow exceeds 0.5 MGD, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall 001. Such
discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specified below:
PARAMETER
Y �
Y r
LIMITS 1 f
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
Monthly Average
Daily Maximum
Measurement
$ Frequency.
Sample
;TYPe
Sample Locations
Flow
0.5 MGD
Continuous
Recording
Influent or Effluent
BODs, 20oC
113.4pounds/day
181.0pounds/day
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Total Suspended Solids
147.7pounds/day
249.7pounds/day
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
COD
475.0pounds/day
849.6pounds/day
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Sulfide
2.9 poundslda
5.8pounds/day
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Phenols
1.4pounds/day
2.9pounds/day
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
Total Chromium
1.4pounds/day
2.9 pounds/day
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Fecal Coliform(geometric mean
200/100 mL
400/100 mL
Weekly
Grab
Effluent, U & D
NH3-N
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Dissolved Oxygen
Weekly
Grab
Effluent, U & D
H2
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
Temperature
Daily
Grab
Effluent
Temperature
s
Grab
U & D
Conductivity
Weekly
Grab
Effluent, U & D
Total Nitrogen
(NO2 + NO3 + TKN)3
No Effluent Limitation (mg/L)
No Effluent Limitation (lb/month) (3)
3
13,698 Ib/year (annual mass loading) (�
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Monthly
Calculated
Effluent
Annual) y
(Calculated)
d ( )
E
Total Phosphorus3
No Effluent Limitation (mg/L)
No Effluent Limitation (lb/month) cal
1522 lb/year (annual mass loading) (3)
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Month)
Calculated
Effluent
Annually
(Calculated)
Effluent
Color4
Monthly
Composite
Effluent
Color4
Monthly
Grab
U & D
Chronic Toxicity5
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent
Total Residual Chlorine
28 /L
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
Notes:
1 U: upstream 50 feet or more above the discharge point. D: downstream at Highway 7 bridge.
Instreami monitoring shall be conducted 3/week from June through September and once per
week the remainder of the year.
2 The pH shall not be less than 6.0 standard units nor greater than 9.0 standard units
3 The annual mass loading for total nitrogen and total phosphorus for Outfall 001 shall be
monitored and calculated as prescribed in A. (5.).
4 See A. (6.) for more information on the permit requirements associated with color. Effluent color
samples shall be taken year-round on a monthly basis. Instream sampling shall be performed on
a monthly basis from April through October.
5 Chronic toxicity (Ceriodaphnia, P/F test at 0.62%) tests shall be performed in January, April, July
and October [see A. (3.].)
There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
Permit NC00048 n
A.(2.) EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
During the period beginning on the month following the first time.the monthly average flow exceeds 0.5-
MGD and lasting until permit expiration, the Permittee is authorized to discharge from outfall 001. Such
discharges shall be limited and monitored by the Permittee as specif ed below:
PARAMETER " `
F,
LIMITS
MONITORING REQUIREMENTS
iq y t ... x ;
Monthl Avera e `
y, g
Dail Maxlmum
y
Measurement
Frequency
Sample'.,.
• Sam
15
T' e
Sam le Location!
p
Flow
1.0 MGD
Continuous
Recording
Influent or Effluent
BOD5, 200C
204.7pounds/day
318.0pounds/day
3/Week
Grab
Effluent
Total Sus ended'Solids.
239.0pounds/day
386.7pounds/day
3/Week
Grab
Effluent
COD
675.9pounds/day
1150.9pounds/day
3/Week
Grab
Effluent
Sulfide
2.9pounds/day
5.8pounds/day
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
Phenols
1.4pounds/day
2.9pounds/day
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
Total Chromium
1.4pounds/day
2.9pounds/day
Weekly
Grab
Effluent
Fecal Coliform(geometric mean
200/100 mL
4001100 mL
3/Week
Grab
Effluent, U & D
NH3-N
3/Week "
Composite
Effluent
Dissolved Oxygen
3/Week
Grab
Effluent, U & D
H2
3/Week
Grab
Effluent
Temperature
Daily
Grab
Effluent '
Temperature
Grab
Upstream,
Downstream
Conductivity,3/Week
Grab
Effluent, U & D
Total Nitrogen
(NO2 + NO3 +TKN)3
No Effluent Limitation (mg/L)
No Effluent Limitation (lb/month) (3)
27397 lb/year (annual mass loading) (3)
Weekly "
Composite
Effluent
Monthly
Calculated
Effluent
Annual) y
(Calculated)
( lated)
Effluent
Total Phosphorus3
No Effluent Limitation (mg/L)
No Effluent Limitation (lb/month) (3)
3044 lb/year (annual mass loading) (3)
Weekly
Composite
Effluent
Monthly
Calculated
Effluent
Annually
(Calculated)
Effluent
Color4
Monthly
Composite
Effluents
Color4
Monthly
Grab
Upstream,
Downstream6
Chronic Toxicit 5
Quarterly
Composite
Effluent,
Total Residual Chlorine
28 /L
3/Week
Grab
Effluent —
Notes:
There.shall be no discharge -of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts.
Ni
Permit NC0004812
A. (3.) CHRONIC TOXICITY MONITORING/LIMIT — 0.5-MGD
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant
mortality to Ceriodaphnia dubia at an effluent concentration of 0.62%.
The permit holder. shall perform at a minimum, quarterly monitoring using test procedures outlined
in the "North Carolina Ceriodaphnia Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised February 1998,
or subsequent versions or "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure"
(Revised -February 1998) or subsequent, versions. The tests will be performed during the months of
January, April, July and October. Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the:
NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in a failure or ChV below
the permit limit, then multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum, in each of the
two following months as described in "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test
Procedure" (Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions.
The chronic value for multiple concentration tests will be determined using the geometric mean of the
highest concentration having no detectable impairment of reproduction or survival and the lowest
concentration that does have a detectable impairment of reproduction or survival. The definition. of
"detectable impairment," collection methods, exposure regimes, and further statistical methods are
specified in the "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised -
February 1998) or subsequent versions.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the months in which tests were performed, using the
parameter code TGP3B for the pass/fail results and T14P313 for the Chronic Value. Additionally, DWQ
Form AT-3 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: North Carolina Division of Water Quality
Environmental Sciences Section
1621 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Branch no
later than 30 days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be'compiete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and
all concentration/response data, and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved
designate signature. Total residual chlorineof the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and
reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream.
Should there be no discharge- of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is
required, the permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT)
test form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of
the report with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The report shallbe
submitted to the Environmental Sciences Branch at the address cited above.
Should the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required,
monitoring will be required during the following month.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed by the North Carolina
Division of Water Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re-
opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum
control organism survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and appropriate environmental
controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed
no later than the last day of the month following the month of the initial monitoring.
Permit.NC00048 k2
A. (4.) CHRONIC TOXICITY MONITORING/LIMIT — 1.0-MGD
The effluent discharge shall at no time exhibit observable inhibition of reproduction or significant
mortality to Cedodaphnia dubia at an effluent concentration of 1-.2%.
The permit holder shall perform at a minimum, auarterlU monitoring using test procedures outlined
in the "North Carolina. Ceriodaphnia, Chronic Effluent Bioassay Procedure," Revised February 1998,
or subsequent versions or "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure"
(Revised -February 1998) or subsequent versions. The tests will be performed during the months of
January, AprU, July and October. Effluent sampling for this testing shall be performed at the
NPDES permitted final effluent discharge below all treatment processes.
If the test procedure performed as the first test of any single quarter results in a failure or ChV below
the permit limit, then multiple -concentration testing shall be performed at a minimum, in each of the
two following months as described in "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity -Test
Procedure" (Revised -February 1998} or subsequent versions.
The chronic value for multiple concentration tests will be determined using the geometric mean of the
highest concentration having no detectable impairment of reproduction or survival and the lowest
concentration that does have a detectable impairment of reproduction or survival. The definition of
"detectable impairment," collection methods, exposure regimes, and further statistical methods are
specified in the "North Carolina Phase II Chronic Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Procedure" (Revised-
February 1998) or subsequent versions.
All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent
Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the months in which tests were performed, using the '
parameter code TGP3B for the pass/fail results and THP3B for the Chronic Value. Additionally, DWQ
Form AT-3 (original) is to be sent to the following address:
Attention: North.Carolina Division• of Water Quality
Environmental Sciences Section
1621 Mail Service 'Center
Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1621
Completed Aquatic Toxicity Test Forms shall be filed with the Environmental Sciences Branch no
later than 30 days after the end of the reporting period for which the report is made.
Test data shall be complete, accurate, include all supporting chemical/physical measurements and
all concentration/response data, and be certified by laboratory supervisor and ORC or approved
designate signature. Total residual chlorine of the effluent toxicity sample must be measured and
reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream. '
Should there be no discharge of flow from the facility during a month in which toxicity monitoring is
'required, the permittee will complete the information located at the top of the aquatic toxicity (AT)
test form indicating the facility name, permit number, pipe number, county, and the month/year of
the report with the notation of "No Flow" in the comment area of the form. The report shall be
submitted to the Environmental Sciences Branch at the address cited above.
Should ,the permittee fail to monitor during a month in which toxicity monitoring is required,
monitoring will be required during the following month.
Should any test data from this monitoring requirement or tests performed. by the. North Carolina
Division of Water Quality indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re-
opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits.
NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum
control organism survival, minimum control organism reproduction, and'appropriate environmental
controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate follow-up testing to be completed
no later than the last day of the month following the month of the initial monitoring.
'� v
Permit NC0004812
A.(5.) TOTAL NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS MONITORING
The Permittee shall calculate the annual mass loading of total nitrogen as the sum of
monthly loadings, according to the following equations:
(a) Monthly Mass Loading (pounds/month) =. TN/TP x Q x 8.34
where: TN = the average total nitrogen concentration (mg/ L) of the
composite samples collected during the month at the otitfall
TP = The average total phosphorus concentration (mg/ L) of the
composite samples collected during the month at the outfall
Q = the total wastewater flow discharged during the month at the
outfall(MG/ month)
8.34 = conversion factor, from (mg& x MG) to pounds
(b) Annual Mass Loading (lb/yr) = E (Monthly Mass Loadings) for the calendar year
The Permittee shall report the total nitrogen and total phosphorus concentration for
each sample and the monthly mass loading in the appropriate self -monitoring report
and the annual mass loading of total nitrogen and total phosphorus in the December
self -monitoring report for the year.
A. (6.) Color Permitting Requirements for Tier 1 Facility
This facility has been classified as a Tier 1 color discharger. The permittee will conduct
color monitoring of instream stations (upstream, downstream) on a monthly basis during
summer season (April -October). The permittee will record whether a color plume was
observed around the outfall pipe during the monthly instream sampling events, and
include that information on the monthly discharge monitoring report. Effluent samples will
be collected monthly for color on a year-round basis. Color samples will be analyzed for
ADMI color at natural pH. Effluent samples will consist of 24-hour composites, while
instream samples will be collected as grabs. Samples will be analyzed by a state certified
laboratory.
If data show that water quality standards for color are being violated by the discharge
permitted by the terms of this permit, then the Director may reopen 'this permit for the
purpose of imposing additional requirements pursuant to 15A NCAC 2H.0114.
Alternatively, if future conditions change and color is no longer a component of the:influent
wastestream, then the permittee may request a permit modification to remove color permit
requirements.
DENR/DWQ
AMENDMENT TO AMENDED FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT
NPDES No. NC0004812
Facility Information
Applicant/Facility Name:
Pharr Yams, Inc.
Applicant Address:
100 Main Street, McAdenville, NC 28101
Facility Address:
147 Willow Drive, McAdenville, NC 28101
Permitted Flow
0.5/1.0 MGD
Type of Waste:
100% htdustrial
Facility/Permit Status:
Class I/Active; Renewal
County:
Gaston County
Miscellaneous
Receiving Stream: South Fork Regional Office: MRO
Catawba River
Stream Classification: WS-V State Grid / USGSQuad: F14SE/Mount Holly
303(d) Listed? No Permit Writer: Agyeman Adu-Poke
Subbasin: 03-08-36 Date: November 9, 2006
Drainage Area (fs) 125
636
Summer 7 10 (cfs) 125
Winter 7Q10 (cfs): 228
30 2 cfs 310
Average Flow (cfs): 808
IWC (%): 1.2 Lat. 35° 15' 40" N Long. 81004' 39" W
BASIS FOR PERMIT MODIFICATION
Pharr Yarns has requested that the limits for sulfide, phenols, and total chromium that were assigned in
the January 21, 2005 permit be reevaluated. A review of the spreadsheet used in calculating limitations
based on plant production data and effluent guidelines from 40 CFR 410.70 Subpart G STOCK AND
YARN FINISHING SUBCATEGORY shows that limits were assigned based on only a percentage of plant
process flow. The correct effluent limits for sulfide, phenols and total chromium, while calculated on the
attached spreadsheet, were not assigned in the 2005 permit. This abbreviated fact sheet recommends a
modification in the limits for the three parameters. The previous permit writer had conferred with EPA
about the monthly average production value that should be used and it was decided that 24000 pounds
per day would be appropriate for calculation of daily maximum and monthly average limits. This
modification is to apply the appropriate limits as calculated by effluent guidelines. The correct limits
are listed below and all limits should be in lbs/day
EXISTING LIMITS TO BE MODIFIED
POLLUTANT
DAILY MAX
MONTHLY AVERAGE
Sulfide
2.3
0.8
Phenol
1.2
0.4
Total Chromium
1.2
0.4
Fact Sheet
NPDES NC0004812 Renewal
Page I
CHANGES TO THE PERMIT
Revised limits for sulfide, phenols and total chromium will be given based on monthly
average production value of 24000 lbs/day projected for 2005. This monthly average
production number was used to calculate both the monthly average and daily maximum
limits. There should be no adjustment for percentage of process flow. The revised limits
will be higher than those given in 2005 permit.
COMPARING WATER QUALITY LIMITS AND EFFLUENT LIMITATION GUIDELINE (ELG)
Reasonable potential analysis (RPA) was performed for sulfide, chromium and phenol at both the outfall
in North Carolina waters and at the State line in South Carolina waters. The RPA at the borderline was
based on a very conservative estimate of the summer 7Q10 (223 cfs) of the South Fork Catawba River.
See the attached RPA spreadsheet for details.
The Tables below compare water quality limits in both States to the effluent limitation guideline, and the
most stringent limits of the two are applied in this permit with the exception of the SC standard and the
corresponding allowable for sulfide. The comparative limits in Tables 3-6 are all in mg/L.
TABLE 3. AVERAGE FLOW OF 0.5 MGD
PARAMETERS
WQS - NC LIMITS
ELG-MONTHLY AVE.
ELG-DAILY MAX.
SULFIDE
NO NC WQS
0.70
1.40
TOTAL CHROMIUM
1.02
0.34
0.70
PHENOL
NO NC WQS
0.34
0.70
TABLE 4. AVERAGE FLOW OF 0.5 MGD
PARAMETERS
WQS - SC LIMITS
ELG-MONTHLY AVE.
ELG-DAILY MAX.
SULFIDE
0.58
0.70
1.40
CHROMIUM III
NO RP
0.34
0.70
CHROMIUM IV
NO RP
0.34
0.70
PHENOL
NO RP
0.34
0.70
TABLE 5. AVERAGE FLOW OF 1.0 MGD
PARAMETERS
WQ - NC LIMITS
ELG-MONTHLY AVE.
ELG-DAILY MAX.
SULFIDE
NO NC WQS
0.35
0.70
TOTAL CHROMIUM
1.02
0.17
0.35
PHENOL
NO NC WQS
0.17
0.35
TABLE 6. AVERAGE FLOW OF 1.0 MGD
PARAMETERS
WQ - SC LIMITS
ELG-MONTHLY AVE.
ELG-DAILY MAX.
SULFIDE
0.29
0.35
0.70
CHROMIUM III
NO RP
0.17
0.35
CHROMIUM VI
1.59
0.17
0.35
PHENOL
NO RP
0.17
0.35
Fact Sheet
NPDES NC)004812 Renewal
Page 2
Sulfide — NC has no water quality standard so ELG limit will be protective in NC. In regards to SC water
quality standards, there will likely be no presence of sulfide at the NC/SC State line, assuming
dissipation of sulfide and also taking into account 8.5 miles distance from the outfall to the State line.
Total Chromium — Both NC and SC water quality standards are less stringent than the ELG limit
so ELG limit is applied in this permit.
Phenol — NC has no water quality standard for phenol. SC's standard is above the ELG so ELG
limit is applied in this permit.
The Division of Water Quality has determined that the increased limits will not result in
contravention of applicable water quality standards or loss of the river's designated uses. An
alternative analysis was not performed because there was no increase in wasteflow or change in
the effluent characteristics from the facility.
Due to the stringency of the limits, the instream waste concentration of 0.62 % under 7Q10
conditions and the discharge point 8.5 miles above the month of the South Fork Catawba River
before its confluence into the Catawba River, DWQ does not believe that the discharge of
sulfide, phenols or total chromium. from Pharr Yarns will affect the water quality in South
Carolina. The distance to the NC/SC'State line and the amount of stream flow makes it unlikely
that the SC standards for these parameters will be violated.
WHOLE EFFLUENT TOXICITY (WET) TEST
Type of Toxicity Test: Chronic-P/F, (Quarterly)
Existing Limit: 001: Chronic P/F @ 0.62%
Recommended Limit: 001:, Chronic. P/F @ 0.62%
Monitoring Schedule: January, April, July, and October.
The permittee has passed all of the nineteen WET tests from January 2002 to July 2006. See the
attached WET testing summary.
CONCLUSION
Pharr Yarns, Inc., an embattled textile industry has done an excellent job passing all its toxicity
tests for the past four years. Sulfide will likely not be considered parameter of concern at the
State line where instream waste concentration (IWC) is 0.35% because at the outfall where IWC
is 0.62%, there is no indication of toxicity problem.
Research indicates that when soluble sulfide is discharged into water, it readily reacts with
hydrogen ions and dissociates into equal forms of HS and HZS at pH 7 (NAS 1974). The fact that
HzS is oxidized in well -aerated water by natural biological systems to sulfates or is biologically
oxidized to elemental sulfur has caused investigators to minimize the toxic effects of HZS on fish
and other aquatic life (Quality Criteria for Water, July 1976).
Based on the above theory and the fact that the permittee. has passed all its toxicity tests at the
outfall and assuming dissipation of sulfide, also considering that the discharge has to be
transported 8.5 miles from the outfall to the State line, NC strongly believes that sulfide will
most likely not be detected at the State line.
Fact Sheet
NPDES NC0004812 Renewal
Page 3
PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF ISSUANCE
Draft Permit to Public Notice: April 14, 2006
Permit Scheduled to Issue: November 27, 2006
NPDES UNIT CONTACT
If you have questions regarding any of the above information or on the attached permit, please
contact Agyeman.Adu-Poke at (919) 733-5083 ext. 508.
NAME • DATE
Fact Sheet
iNPDES NC?004812 Renewal
Page 4
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Pharr Yarns, Inc.
NC0004812
Time Period July 2004 - July 2006
Qw (MGD) 0.5'
WWTP Class IV
7Q10S (cfs) 125
IWC (%) @ 7Q10S • 0.6162
7Q10W (cfs) 228
@ 7Q10W 0.3388
30Q2 (cfs) 310
@ 30Q2 0.2494
Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cfs) 808
@ QA 0.0958
Rec'ving Stream South Fork Catawba River
Stream Class WS-V
Outfall 001
Qw=0.5MGD
STANDARDS &
PARAMETER
TYPE
CRITERIA (2)
PQL
Units
REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS
RECOMMENDED ACTION
NCWQS
(t)
NCWQSI %FAV/
n #Det MaxPndCw AllowableCw
Chronic Acute
Acute: N/A
Sulfide
NC
108 13
26.5
No, NCwater quality standards.
_ _..,_
_ _ _
Chronic #VALUE[
_ _ _ _ _
Effluent limitation guideline'limitwill be applied. •,
Acute: 1.022
Effluent limitation guideline limit will be applied.
Chromium
NC
0.05 1.022
mg/L
108 108
2.8
_ _ - -
----------------------------
Chronic 8
Acute: N/A
Phenols
A
0.001 N
mg/L
107 41
0.8
_ _ _ _
_ No water quality standards. • _ _ _ _ _.
_
Chronic 0.40
_
Effluent limitation guideline limit will be applied. '
Acute: N/A
"Legend. •' Freshwater Discharge
C = Carcinogenic
NC = Non -carcinogenic
A =Aesthetic
npdes rpa-NC.5MGD, rpa
12/4/2006
REASONABLE. POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Pharr Yarns, Inc.
NC0004812
Time Period July 2004 -July 2006
Qw (MGD) 1
WWtP Class IV
7Q10S (cfs) 125
/WC (%) @ 7Q10S 1.2248
7Q10W (cfs) 228
@ 7Q10W 0.6752
30Q2 (cfs) 310
@ 30Q2 0.4975
Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cfs) 808
@ QA 0.1915
Rec'ving Stream South Fork Catawba River
Stream Class WS-V
Outfall 001
Qw = 1 MGD
STANDARDS &
PARAMETER
TYPE
CRITERIA (2)
PQL
Units
REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS
RECOMMENDED ACTION
NCWQS
NCWQSI Y,,FAV/
n #Det MaxPmdCw AllowableCw
Chronic Acute
Acute: N/A
Sulfide
NC
mg/L
108 13
26.5
_ _ _ _
__ No quality standards: _ _ _
_
Chronic #VALUEI
_'
Effluent, limitation guideline limit will, .be applied.
Acute: 1.022
Effluent limitation guideline limit will be applied because its
Chromium
NC
0.050 1.022
mg/L
108 108
2.8
more protective of NC waters'
Chronic_ 4.08 -
---------.----------.--------
Acute: N/A
Phenols
A
0.0010 N
mg/L
107 41
0.8
_ _ _ _
__ No quality standards., ,_ _ _ _ _ _
_
Chronic 0.20
Effluent limitation guideline limit will be applied.
Acute: N/A
"Legend. "" Freshwater Discharge
C = Carcinogenic
NC = Non -carcinogenic
A =Aesthetic
npdes rpa-NCIMGD, rpa
12/4/2006
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Pharr Yarns, Inc.
N C0004812
Time Period July 2004 - July 2006
Qw (MGD) 0.5
WWTP Class IV
7Q10S (cfs) 223
/WC (%) @ 7Q10S 0.3463
7Q10W (cfs) 228
@ 7Q10W 0.3388
30Q2 (cfs) 310
@ 30Q2 0.2494
Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cfs) 808
@ QA 0.0958
Rec'ving Stream South Fork Catawba River
Stream Class WS-V
Outfall 001
Qw = 0.5 MGD
STANDARDS &
PARAMETER
TYPE
CRITERIA (2)
PQL
Units
REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS
RECOMMENDED ACTION
SCWQS
(t)
NCWQS/ %FAV/
n #Det MaxPredCw AllowableCw
Chronic Acute
Acute: N/A
Assuming dissipation of sulfide, NC believes .
Sulfide
NC
0.002
mg/L
108 13
26.5
there will not be sulfide af.NC/SC boardedine so ELG will
_
Chronic 0.58
------ ------ ----------------
protect water quality at the borderline.
Acute: N/A
Chromium III
NC
0.028
mg/L
108 108
2.8
No reasonable_ potential _ _ _ _ _
Chronic_ 8.08
Effluent limitation guideline limit for total for chromium
will be.applied.
Acute: N/A
Phenols
A
21.000 N
mg/L
107 41
0.8
No reasonable_ potential
_ _ _ _
Chronic_ 8,421.00
_ _ _ _ _
Effluent limitation guideline limit will be applied.
Acute: N/A
Chromium VI
NC
0.011
mg/L
108 108
2.8
No_ reasonable_ potential
_ _ _ _ _
Chronic 3.18
_°
Effluent limitation guideline limit for total chromium
will be applied.
Legend.
C = Carcinogenic
NC = Non -carcinogenic
A = Aesthetic
" Freshwater Discharge
npdes rpa-SC.5MGD, rpa
12/4/2006
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Pharr Yarns, Inc.
NC0004812-
Time Period July 2004 - July 2006
Qw (MGD) 1
WWTP Class IV
7Q10S (cfs) 223
IWC (%) @ 7Q10S 0.6903
7Q10W (cfs) 228
@ 7Q10W 0.6752
30Q2 (cfs) 310
@ 30Q2 0.4975
Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cfs) 808
@ QA 0.1915
Rec'ving Stream South Fork Catawba River
Stream Class WS-V
Outfall 001
Qw = 1 MGD
STANDARDS &
PARAMETER
TYPE
CRITERIA (2)
PQL
Units
REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS
RECOMMENDED ACTION
SCWQS
(1)
NCWQS/ FAV/
Chronic Acute
n #Det MaxPredCw AllowableCw
Acute: N/A
Assuming dissipation sulfide, NC believes
Sulfide
NC
0.002
mg/L
108 13
26.5
there will not be sulfide at NC/SC,boarderline soELG will
- -
-------- -
Chronic: 0.290
-`-- --- ----- - - --_
-
protect, water quality at the borderline.
Acute: N/A
Chromium 111
NC
0.028
mg/L
108 108
2.8
No reasonable_ potential •_
Chronic_ 4.06
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
Effluent limitation guideline for total chromium will be applies
Acute: N/A
Phenols
A
21.000 N
mg/L
107 41
0.8
No reasonable potential,
_ _ _ _ _
Chronic 4,221.00
Effluent limitation guideline for total chromium will be applies
Acute: N/A
Chromium VI
NC
0.011
mg/L
108 108
2.8
_ _ _ _ _
Chronic 1.59
_ _ _' _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Effluent limitation" guideline limit for total chromium,
will be applied at the outfall because its more protective
Acute: N/A
r.egeno: rresnwarer urscnarge
C = Carcinogenic
NC = Non -carcinogenic
A = Aesthetic
npdes rpa-SC1MGD, rpa
12/4/2006
Pharr Yarns` (NC0004812)- Permit Modification
Subject: Pharr Yarns (NC0004812)- Permit Modification
From: Agyeman Adu-Poku <Agyeman.Adupoku@ncmail.net>
Date: Thu, 09 Nov 2006 11:21:12 -0500
To: vickermg@dhec.sc.gov
CC: Susan Wilson <susan.a.wilson@ncmail.net>
Melinda, ,
Pharr Yarns WWTP's permit modification has been re -assigned to
Nowell had to go on medical leave. We apologize for the delay
in addressing SC concerns on this modification. I will like to
to address all your concerns so that the permit can be issued
delays.
me because Jackie
take this opportunity
without further
Just a recap of the key issues with this permit, NC DWQ issued a permit to Pharr
Yarns, Inc. in January 2005 with miscalculated limits which were developed from 40
CFR Part 410.10 Subpart G. The permittee was issued civil penalties and after further
review of the limits we�realized the error. The permit was then drafted with the
correct permit limits, noticed and EPA approved the draft. SC had concerns about the
new limits as to whether it would protect SC waters.
Based on a very conservative estimate of the summer 7Q10 (223 cfs) of the South Fork
Catawba River at the NC/SC border line with a discharge flow of 0.5 MGD,
approximately 8.5 miles from the outfall, a reasonable potential analysis was
performed for sulfide, chromium and phenol using SC water quality standards.
Considering all the variables involved in this situation, NC believes that SC waters
will be protected (See data for details). Although the permit includes an effluent
limitation page for 1.0 MGD, NC believes that the permittee will never reach that
capacity within this permit cycle based on the last two years effluent data and the
known volatility history of textile industry. See the attachment for all the data
used.
Please let me have your comments as soon as possible (preferably by Nov. 24th). For
your convenience, we will be happy to schedule a conference call with you if you
like. If no comment is.received by the said.date, we will move forward with a final
permit. Thanks a lot for your cooperation on this matter. If you have any questions,
please feel free to give me a call at (919) 733-5083 ext. 508 or you can always reach
me by an email. Thanks a lot.
Agyeman
Agyeman Adu-Poku <agyeman.adupoku a,ncmail.net>
Environmental Engineer
Department of Environment & Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality-NPDES Unit
Content -Type: application/msword
4812-Fact Sheet-mod2006.doc
Content -Encoding: base64
Content -Type: application/msword�
4812-effluent-2006.d0
c
Content -Encoding: base64
1 of 2 12/4/2006 10:05 AN
Pharr Yams (NCO0048lZ+Permit Modification
-- ---------'- — ------ -'
Content -Type: applicafion/vnd.ms-excel
)MR—review—template-Fl Content -En coding: base64
Content -Type: application/vnd.ms-excel
-Encoding: base64
Content
Content -Type: application/vnd.ms-excel
Content -Encoding: base64
/
/
3npdes rpa-SC.5MGD.xlsL!
|� Content -Encoding: base64
�
Content -Encoding: base64
'
IF Content -Type: application/pH
�
2of2 12/4/200610:05AM
TEXTILE EFFLUENT LIMITS SPREADSHEET
PERMIT NO: NC0004812
PERMITTEE: PHARR YARNS, INC.
COUNTY: GASTON
PERMITTED FLOW: 0.5 MGD
BASED ON 40CFR410.70 SUBPART G
STOCK AND YARN FINISHING SUBCATEGORY
PRODUCTION DATA:
DAILY MAX. 24000 according to EPA recommendation
MONTHLY AVG. 24000
rKVmvUVMK W./UDU6YAK1 U tall nmism
6.8
84.6
17.4
e 0.24
t 0.12
Chromium 0.12
must be bets n 6 and 9 at all times
LIMITS
POLLUTANT
BOD5
163.2
81.6
COD
2030.4
1015.2
TSS
417.6
208.8
Sulfide
5.8
2.9
Phenol
2.9
1.4
Total Chromium
2.9
1.4
pH
must be between 6 and 9 at all times
FOR PHARR YARNS, ONLY 27% OF FLOW IS
Lllwl I J XVVVRUINY L-T:
44.1
548.2
112.8
e 1.6
/I 0.8
Chromium 0.8
must be between 6 and 9 at all times
FINAL LIMITS
181.0
849.6
249.7
e
2.3
of
1.2
Chromium
1.2
must be between 6 and 9 at all times
DOMESTIC WASTE IS 73%,
ADD ALLOCATION FOR THAT
ANT
MAX
GODS
IDAILY13
91.3
B(S
O
IMO
91.3
COD
301.3659
200.9106
113.4I• original BOO limits were 390 lb/day (monthly ave)
475.0 and 780 lb/day (daily max), so these limits are still
147.7 orotective of DO
TEXTILE EFFLUENT LIMITS SPREADSHEET
PERMIT NO:
PERMITTEE:
COUNTY:
h tu1011 a,
NC0004812
PHARR YARNS, INC.
GASTON
1 MGD
BASED ON 40CFR410.70 SUBPART G
STOCK AND YARN FINISHING SUBCATEGORY
PRODUCTION DATA (in Ibs/day):
DAILY MAX.
24000
according to EPA recommendation
MONTHLY AVG.
240 00
FROM 40CFR 410.70 SUBPART G (all limits in Ibs/1000 Ibs)
POLLUTANT
DAILY MAX MONTHLY AVERAGN..
,
BODS
6.8
3.4
COD
84.6
42.3
TSS
17.4
8.7
Sulfide
0.24
0.12
Phenol
0.12
0.06
Total Chromium
0.12
0.06
pH
must be between 6 and 9 at all times
LIMITS
POLLUTAj ,
DAILY MAX
MONTHLY AVERAGE
BODS
163.2
81.6
COD
2030.4
1015.2
TSS
417.6
208.8
Sulfde
5.8
2.9
Phenol
2.9
1.4
Total Chromium
2.9
1.4
pH
must be between 6 and 9 at all times
FOR PHARR YARNS, ONLY 27% OF FLOW IS
PROCESS FLOW ADJUST LIMITS ACCORDINGLY:
44.1 22.0
548.2 274.1
112.8 56.4
e
1.6 O.E
tl
0.8 0.4
Chromium
0.8 0.4
must be between 6 and 9 at all times
FINAL LIMITS
i
318.0
1150.9
386.7
e
2.3
31
1.2
Chromium
1.2
9 at all times
DOMESTIC WASTE IS 73%,
ADD ALLOCATION FOR THAT
POS POLLUTANT
AVERAGE
ITS
(DAILY 274
OIMONTHLY
CODS
602.7318
401.8212
�e�"liy 1
original BOD limits were 390lb/day (monthly ave)
nd 780 lb/day (daily max), so these limits are still
rotective of DO
02/15/06 11:38, HORIZON ENGINEERING & CONSULTING a PHARR YARNS TRAF
max
Summary
410.73�6AT
- ,� and 410.72
IEPA_Limitations in 40 CFR
_ _ Effluent Limits -
Effluent Parameter lbs/1000 Ibs of roduct Ibs/da-�-------"
Dail Max TComments+
30 day av Dail Max 30 da av .
BOD5 6.8 3.40 333 129 BAT
C� 84.6 42,30 4,145 1,607 BAT
7aS 17.4 8.70 853
Suicide 3 31 BAT
0.2 4 0.12 11.8 4.6 BAT
Phenols 0.12 0.06
Total Chromiu 5 2.3 BAT
0.12 0.06 5.9 H 6.0-9.0 6.0-9.0 6.0.9.0 ,3 BAT
6.0-2.0
_Production numbs -------J---'__ �_-
numbers are based on letter and into submitted b aP licant 7124%g6. Data- from 4/1/94�- 3/29/96. 1
NO.706
Montht -- S day - based on max. machines production '
_- Yavg. (38.220 Ibs/da - actual avera i --
Per Mike Church --_._ ..- Y _ _�.._.._.... 9 e�_ --- , - --- - i - -
_. Ch _ age o erating dam is 9.5 6 da s -
-T__-� 9221 �er week,'� ._..._
Allowance far Sanita W
Flow see Ittr. 6/26/96' and #
8 on a lication I
:Seconda Con Ibs/da mon, av Dail max
BADS ' _f-__ - ,�.�b:Z-=
--�-��
max
3 0
52.79 4 5i 79`19'
30
52.79 451
7 9.1 9
_
1=ffluent Limits
-
Effluent Para
-
Ibs/da
r
BOD5
Dail Max
30 da av
��-
�
41 2
182 _
TSS
4 145
1,607 -'
Sulfide
932
--
383
f
Phenols
11.8
.6
Total Chroml
H
5.9
5 9
2 ,3
2.3
�
i
6.0-9.0
6.0.9.0 -`--I-
-
r-
Page 1 -
W*d-j
APPENDIX: WATER QUALITY NUMERIC CRITERIA FOR THE PROTECTION OF
AQUATIC LIFE AND HUMAN HEALTH
This appendix contains three charts (priority pollutants, nonpriority pollutants, and organoleptic effects) of numeric criteria for the protection ofhuman health and aquatic life. The appendix also
contains three attachments which address hardness conversions and application of ammonia criteria. Footnotes specific to each chart follow the chart. General footnotes pertaining to all are at
the end of the charts prior to the attachments. Please refer to the text of the regulation for other general information and specifications in applying these numeric criteria.
PRIORITY TOXIC POLLUTANTS
Freshwater Aquatic Life
Saltwater Aquatic Life
Human Health
For Consumption of:
CAS
CMC
CCC
CMC
CCC
FR Cite/
Priority Pollutant
Number
(µg/L)
(µg/L)
(µg/L)
(/sg/L)
Water&
Organism
MCL
Source
Organism
Only
(µ91L)
(ug/L)
(pg/L)
5.6
640
6
65FR66443
1
Antimony7440360
B,«
B,ne
to
SDWA
340
150
69
36
0.018
0.14
10
65FR31682
2
Arsenic
7440382
A, D. K
A, D, K
A, D, Y
A, D, Y
C, R, ff
C, R, ff
C
57FR60848
SDWA
44
65FR31682
3
Beryllium
7440417
1, ee
1,ee
SDWA
0.53
0.10
43
9.3
5
65FR31682
4
Cadmium
7440439
D, E, K
D, E, K
D, Y
D. Y
J. x
1, to
to
SDWA
580
28
100 Tani
EPA820/13-96-001
Sa
Chromium III
16065831
D, E, K
D, E, K
l• ee
l• C0
to
65FR31682
SDWA
16
11
1,100
50
100 Taal
65FR31682
5b
Chromium VI
18540299
D,K
D,K
D,Y
D,Y
l <e
lee
to
SDWA
6
Copper
7440508
3.8
2.9
5.8
3.7
1,300
65FR31682
D, E, K, Z
D, E, K. Z
D. Z, Y, to
D. Z. Y, to
T, to
7
Lead
7439921
14
0.54
220
8.5
65FR31682
D, E,Y
D, E.Y
D,Y
D,Y
'
8
Mercury
7439976
L6
0.91
2.1
1.1
0.050
0.051
2
65FR31682
D, K dd
D, K dd
D. bb, dd
D, bb. dd
B, to
B. to
x
SDWA
36
Freshwater Aquatic Life
Saltwater Aquatic Life
Human Health
For Consumption of-.
CAS
CIVIC
CCC
CMC
CCC
FR Cite/
Priority Pollutant
Number
(1sg/L)
G41-)
G491L)
(ig/L)
Water &
Organism
MCL
Source
Organism
Only
(Ug/L)
Gd9IL)
(14L)
36
1, 2-Trans-
156605
700
140,000
100
65FR31682
Dichloroethylene
B,«
B,«
«
SDWA
37
1, I, 1-Trichloroethane
71556
J,ee
200
65FR31682
ee
SDWA
38
1, 1, 2-Trichloroethane
79005
0.59
16
5
65FR66443
B,C
B,C
C
SDWA
39
Trichloroeth lene
y
79016
2.5
30
5
65FR66443
C
C
C
SDWA
2.0
530 -
2
65FR66443 -
40
Vinyl Chloride
75014
C
C
c
SDWA
41
2-Chlorophenol
95578
81
150
65FR66443B,
T, ee
B, T, m
42
2,4-Dichlorophenol
120832
77
290
65FR66443
B, T, ee
B, T, .
43
2,4-Dimethylphenol
105679
380
850
65FR66443
B, T, ee
B, T, «
2-Methyl- 4, 6-
13
280
65FR66443
44
Dinitrophenol
534521
ee
ee
45
2,4-Dinitrophenol
51285
69
5,300
65FR66443
B. ee
B, «
19
15
13
7.9
0.27
3.0
1
65FR31682
46
Pentachlorophenol
87865
F. K
F, K
v
v
B. C
B, C. H
C
65FR66443
SDWA
47
Phenol
108952
21,000
1,700,000
65FR66443
B, T, «
B, H, T, ee
48
2, 4, 6-Trichlorophenol
88062
1.4
2A
65FR66443
B, C,T
B,C
39
Freshwater Aquatic Life
Saltwater Aquatic Life
Human Health
For Consumption of.
CAS
Non Priority Pollutant
Number
FR Cite/Source
CMC
CCC
CMC
CCC
Water&
Organism
MCL
WIL)
(µg/L)
(µg/L)
(,g/L)
Organism
Only
(µg/L)
(YPiL)
(Vg/L)
49
Salinity
NARRATIVE STATEMENT - SEE TEXT
Gold Book
50
Simazine
122349
4
SDWA
Solids Suspended and
NARRATIVE STATEMENT AND NUMERIC CRITERIA - SEE TEXT
Gold Book
51
Turbidity
State Standard
52
Styrene
100425
100
L
SDWA
53
Sulfide -Hydrogen Sulfide 7783064
2.0
E0
-
Gold Book
54
Tainting Substances
NARRATIVE STATEMENT- SEE TEXT
Gold Book
55
SPECIES DEPENDENT CRITERIA - SEE TEXT
Red Book
Temperature
/
56
1, 2, 4, 5-Tetrachlorobennne
95943
0.97 1.1
D D
65FR66443
57
Tributyltin (TBT)
688733
0.46 0.063
0.37 0.010
EPA 822-F-00-008
58
2, 4, 5-Trichlomphenol
95954
8800 3,600
65FR66443
59
X lens, Total
y
10,000
L
SDWA
60
Uranium
30
SDWA
Freshwater Aquatic Life
Saltwater Aquatic Life
Human Health
For Consumption of -
CAS
CMC CCC
CMC CCC
FR Cite/
Priority Pollutant
Number
(}sg/L) (Ug/L)
(Ug/L) (yg/L)
Water & Organism MCL
Source
Organism Only
(AzglL) (g/L) (Ug/L)
0.52 0.0038
0.053 0.0036
0.000039 0.000039B, 0.2
65FR31682
101
Heptachlor Epoxide
1024573
G, U G, U, x
G, U G, U, x
B, C C C
65FR66443
SDWA
Polychlorinated
0.014
M, x
0.03
M, x
0.000064 0.000064 0.5
B, C, M B, C, M C
65FR31682
102
Biphenyls PCBs
--
65FR66443
SDWA
103
Toxaphene
8001352
0.73 0.0002
0.21 0.0002
0.00028 0.00028 3
65FR31682
x
x
B,C B,C C
65FR66443
SDWA
Footnotes:
A This water quality criterion was derived from data for arsenic (III), but is applied here to total arsenic, which might imply that arsenic (III) and arsenic (V) are equally toxic to aquatic life and that their toxicities are
additive. In the arsenic criteria document (EPA 440/5-84-033, January 1985), Species Mean Acute Values are given for both arsenic (III) and arsenic (V) for five species and the ratios ofthe SMAVs for each species
range from 0.6 to 1.7. Chronic values are available for both arsenic (III) and arsenic (V) for one species; for the fathead minnow, the chronic value for arsenic (V) is 0.29 times the chronic value for arsenic (III). No
data are known to be available concerning whether the toxicities of the forms of arsenic to aquatic organisms are additive.
B This criterion has been revised to reflect The Environmental Protection Agency's ql * or RfD, as contained in the Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) as of May 17, 2002. The fish tissue bioconcentration factor
(BCF) from the 1980 Ambient Water Quality Criteria document was retained in each case. -
C This criterion is based on carcinogenicity of 10-6 risk. As prescribed in Section E of this regulation, application of this criterion for permit effluent limitations requires the use annual average flow or comparable tidal
condition as determined by the Department.
D Freshwater and saltwater criteria for metals are expressed in terms of total recoverable metals. As allowed in Section E of this regulation, these criteria may be expressed as dissolved metal for the purposes of deriving
permit effluent limitations. The dissolved metal water quality criteria value may be calculated by using these 304(a) aquatic life criteria expressed in terms of total recoverable metal, and multiplying it by a conversion
factor (CF). The term "Conversion Factor" (CF) represents the conversion factor for converting a metal criterion expressed as the total recoverable fraction in the water column to a criterion expressed as the dissolved
fraction in the water column. (Conversion Factors for saltwater CCCs are not currently available. Conversion factors derived for saltwater CMCs have been used for both saltwater CMCs and CCCs). See "Office of
Water Policy and Technical Guidance on Interpretation and Implementation of Aquatic Life Metals Criteria", October 1,1993, by Martha G. Prothro, Acting Assistant Administrator for Water, available from the Water
Resource center, USEPA, 401 M St., SW, mail code RC4100,Washington, DC 20460; and 46CFR§ 131.36(b)(1). Conversion Factors can be found in Attachment 1 — Conversion Factors for Dissolved Metals.
E The freshwater criterion for this metal is expressed as a function of hardness (mg/L) in the water column. The value given here corresponds to a hardness of 25 mg/L as expressed as CaCO3. Criteria values for other
hardness may be calculated from the following: CMC (dissolved) = exp{mA [ln(hardness)]+ bA) (CF), or CCC (dissolved) = exp{mc [In (hardness)]+ bc) (CF) and the parameters specified in Attachment 2 —
Parameters for Calculating Freshwater Dissolved Metals Criteria That Are Hardness -Dependent. As noted in footnote D above, the values in this appendix are expressed as total recoverable, the criterion may be
calculated from the following: CMC (total) = exp{mA [In( hardness)]+ bA), or CCC (total) = exp{mc [In (hardness)]+ bc).
F Freshwater aquatic life values for pentachlorophenol are expressed as a function of pH, and are calculated as follows: CMC = exp(1.005(pH)-4.869); CCC = exp(1.005(pH)-5.134). Values displayed in table
correspond to a pH of 7.8.
G This criterion is based on 304(a) aquatic life criterion issued in 1980, and was issued in one of the following documents: Aldrin/Dieldrin (EPA 440/5-80-019), Chlordane (EPA 440/5-80-027), DDT (EPA 440/5-80-
038), Endosulfan (EPA 440/5-80-046), Endrin (EPA 440/5-80-047), Heptachlor (440/5-80-052), Hexachlorocyclohexane (EPA 440/5-80-054), Silver (EPA 440/5-80-071).. The Minimum Data Requirements and
derivation procedures were different in the 1980 Guidelines than in the 1985 Guidelines. For example, a "CMC" derived using the 1980 Guidelines was derived to be used as an instantaneous maximum. If assessment
is to be done using an averaging period, the values given should be divided by 2 to obtain a value that is more comparable to a CMC derived using the 1985 Guidelines.
H No criterion for protection of human health from consumption of aquatic organisms excluding water was presented in the 1980 criteria document or in the 1986 Quality Criteria for Water. Nevertheless, sufficient
information was presented in the 1980 document to allow the calculation of a criterion, even though the results of such a calculation were not shown in the document.
I This criterion for asbestos is the Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) developed under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) and the National Primary Drinking Water Regulation (NPDWR).
J EPA has not calculated a 304(a) human health criterion for this contaminant. The criterion is the Maximum Contaminant Level developed under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) and the National Primary .
Drinking Water Regulation (NPDWR). 44
K This criterion is based on a 304(a) aquatic life criterion that was issued in the 1995 Updates: Water Quality Criteria Documentsfor the Protection ofAquatic Life in Ambient Water, (EPA-820-B-96-001, September
1996). This value was derived using the GLI Guidelines (60FR 15393-15399, March 23, 1995; 40CFRI32 Appendix A); the difference between the 1985 Guidelines and the GLI Guidelines are explained on page iv of
the 1995 Updates. None of the decisions concerning the derivation of this criterion were affected by any considerations'that are specific to the Great Lakes.
L The CMC=1/[(f7/CMC 1) + (f2/CMC2)] where fl and f2 are the fractions of total selenium that are treated as selenite and selenate, respectively, and CMC 1 and CMC2 are 185.9 µg /1 and 12.82 ug /l, respectively.
M This criterion applies to total PCBs, (e.g., the sum of all congener or all isomer or homolog or Aroclor analyses.)
N The derivation of the CCC for this pollutant did not consider exposure through the diet, which is probably important for aquatic life occupying upper trophic levels.
O This state criterion is also based on a. total fish consumption rate of 0.0175 kg/day.
P This water quality criterion is expressed as Ecg free cyanide (as CN)/L.
Q This value was announced (61 FR58444-58449, November 14, 1996) as a proposed GLI 303 I aquatic life. criterion
R This water quality criterion for arsenic refers to the inorganic form only.
S This water quality criterion for selenium is expressed in terms of total recoverable metal in the water column. It is scientifically acceptable to use the conversion factor (0.996 - CMC or 0.922- CCC) thatwas used in
the GLI to convert this to a value that is expressed in terms of dissolved metal.
T The organoleptic effect criterion is more stringent than the value for priority toxic pollutants.
U This value was derived from data for heptachlor and the criteria document provides insufficient data to estimate the relative toxicities of heptachlor and heptachlor epoxide.
V There is a full set of aquatic life toxicity data that show that DEHP is not toxic to aquatic organisms at or below its solubility limit.
W This value was derived from data for endosulfan and is most appropriately applied to the sum of alpha-endosulfan and beta-endosulfan.
X This criterion is based on a 304(a) aquatic life criterion issued in 1980 or 1986, and was issued in one of the following documents: Aldrin/Dieldrin (EPA440/5-80-019), Chlordane (EPA 440/5-80-027), DDT (EPA
440/5-80-038), Endrin (EPA 440/5-80-047), Heptachlor (EPA 440/5-80-052), Polychlorinated Biphenyls (EPA 440/5- 80-068), Toxaphene (EPA 440/5-86-006). This CCC is based on the Final Residue value
procedure in the 1985 Guidelines. Since the publication of the Great Lakes Aquatic Life Criteria Guidelines in 1995 (60FR15393-15399, March 23, 1995), the EPA no longer uses the Final Residue value procedure for
deriving CCCs for new or revised 304(a) aquatic life criteria.
Y This water quality criterion is based on a 304(a) aquatic life criterion that was derived using the 1985 Guidelines (Guidelines for Deriving Numerical National Water Quality Criteria for the Protection ofAquatic
Organisms and Their Uses, P1385-227049, January 1985) and was issued in one of the following criteria documents: Arsenic (EPA 440/5-84-033), Cadmium (EPA 440/5-84-032), Chromium (EPA 440/5-84-029),
Copper (EPA 440/5-84-031), Cyanide (EPA 44015-84-028), Lead (EPA 440/5-84-027), Nickel (EPA 440/5-86-004), Pentachlorophenol (EPA 440/5-86-009), Toxaphene, (EPA 440/5-86-006), Zinc (EPA 440/5-87-
003).
Z When the concentration of dissolved organic carbon is elevated, copper is substantially less toxic and use of Water -Effect Ratios might be appropriate.
as The selenium criteria document (EPA 440/5-87-006, September 1987) provides that if selenium is as toxic to saltwater fishes in the field as it is to freshwater fishes in the field, the status of the fish community should
be monitored whenever the concentration of selenium exceeds 5.0 µg/L in salt water because the saltwater CCC does not take into account uptake via the food chain.
bb This water quality criterion was derived on page 43 of the mercury criteria document (EPA 440/5-84-026, January 1985). The saltwater CCC of 0.025 ug/L given on page 23 of the criteria document is based on the
Final Residue value procedure in the 1985 Guidelines. Since the publication of the Great Lakes Aquatic Life criteria Guidelines in 1995 (60FR15393-15399, March 23, 1995), the EPA no longer uses the Final Residue
value procedure for deriving CCCs for new or revised 304(a) aquatic life criteria.
cc This water quality criterion was derived in Ambient Water Quality Criteria Saltwater CopperAddendum (Draft, April 14, 1995) and was promulgated in the Interim Final National Toxics Rule (60FR22228-222237,
May 4, 1995).
dd This water quality criterion was derived from data for inorganic mercury (II), but is applied here to total mercury. If a substantial portion of the mercury in the water column is methylmercury, this criterion will
probably be under protective. In addition, even though inorganic mercury is converted to methylmercury and methylmercury bioaccumulates to a great extent, this criterion does not account for uptake via the food
chain because sufficient data were not available when the criterion was derived.
ee This criterion is a noncarcinogen. As prescribed in Section E of this regulation, application of this criterion for determining permit effluent limitations requires the use of 7Q10 or comparable tidal condition as
determined by the Department.
ff EPA is currently reassessing the criteria for arsenic.
gg This criterion applies to DDT and its metabolites (i.e., the total concentration of DDT and its metabolites should not exceed this value).
hh Although a new RfD is available in IRIS, the surface water criteria will not be revised until the National Primary Drinking Water Regulations: Stage 2 Disinfectants and Disinfection Byproducts Rule (Stage 2 DBPR) is
completed, since public comment on the relative source contribution (RSC) for chloroform is anticipated. -
ii Although EPA has not published a completed criteria document for phthalate, it is EPA's understanding that sufficient data exist to allow calculation of aquatic life criteria.
45
Attachment 1- Conversion Factors for Dissolved Metals
Metal
Conversion Factor
freshwater CMC
Conversion Factor
freshwater CCC
Conversion Factor,
saltwater CMC
Conversion Factor
saltwater CCC
Arsenic
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
Cadmium
1.136672-[(In
hardness)(0.041838)]
1.101672-[(ln
hardness)(0.041838)]
0.994
0.994
Chromium III
0.316
0.860
--
--
Chromium VI
0.982
0.962
0.993
0.993
Copper
0.960
0.960
0.83
0.83
Lead
1.46203-[(In
hardness)(0.145712)]
1.46203-[(ln
hardness)(0.145712)]
0.951
0.951
Mercury
0.85
0.85
0.85
0.85
Nickel
0.998
0.997
0.990
0.990
Selenium
--
--
0.998
0.998
Silver
0.85
--
0.85
--
Zinc
0.978
0.986
0.946
0.946
57
TEXTILE EFFLUENT LIMITS SPREADSHEET
PERMIT NO: NC0004812
PERMITTEE: PHARR YARNS, INC.
COUNTY: GASTON
BASED ON 40CFR410.70 SUBPART G
STOCK AND YARN FINISHING SUBCATEGORY
PERMITTED FLOW: 0.5 MGD
PRODUCTION DATA:
DAILY MAX. 24000 according to EPA recommendation
MONTHLY AVG. 24000
MUM 4Vl M 41U./U LUbFAKI U tdll IIRInS In lub/IUUU lust
POLLUTANT
DAILY MAX MONTHLY AVERAGE
-�,
BOD5
6.8
3.4
COD
84.6
42.3
S
17.4
8.7
Sulfide
0.24
0.12
Phenol
0.12
0.06
Total Chromium
0.12
0.06
pH
must be between 6 and 9 at all times
LIMITS
417.6 208.8
5.8 2.9
d 2.9 1.4
Chromium 2.9 1.4
must be between 6 and 9 at all times
FOR PHARR YARNS, ONLY 279/o OF FLOW IS
PROCESS FLOW ADJUST LIMITS ACCORDINGLY:
VM1L1 PIMA 1'I VIYIIILI IfY
BOOS
44.1
22.0
COD
548.2
274.1
TSS
112.8
56.4
Sulfide
5.8
2.9
Phenol
2.9
1.4
Total Chromium
2.9
1.4
pH
must be between 6 and 9 at all times
FINAL LIMITS
i 181.0 113
849.6 475
249,f, (h'da 147
e• 5.8'•�j 2
DI 2.9 1
Chromium 2.9 1
DOMESTIC WASTE IS 73%,
ADD AI LOCATION FOR THAT
DAILY M
LY AVERAGE
rLLUTANT
BODS
137.0
91.3
TSS
137.
991.3
GOD W1.3ti59 2UU.`Jlub
original BOD limits were 390 lb/day (monthly ave)
nd 780 Ib/day (daily max), so these limits are still
rotective of DO
t Cr�i2 �w„� ��o �ex�;�e m�1ls faVNf
PT-
VY�a x I 'I`I Ntck) A-tQ-
Clow c�rom►%Aw,
7
I�
'�s Cat
Sc' -b �- m
CO�rn w r to SID
l 11 ) u 7. V I L, /.� f L k a,"
It11 c,
0,.f>1G,✓i1/zrc7S J2S u
4p� O-C
tl" 7ou 3 _
�711 i✓r L D, gS� � O, 0 86 J�,f�L s J. a y s /, /��/ M4� � //g�%/ '�_
67f 1
Gro z w 3
L o, 79y= o. dgx
:r8 $°
Date
Flow
MGD(lb/day)
BOD
COD
(lb/clay)
TSS
(lb/day)
pH (su)
Jul-04
0.094
36.050
220.725
33.100
7.05
Aug-04
0.116
26.750
332.250
39.000
7.18
Sep-04
0.139
48.600
404.400
43.000
7.46
Oct-04
0.140
8.675
172.000
23.075
7.00
Nov-04
0.148
12.900
205.750
30.250
7.15
Dec-04
0.129
17.200
379.000
47.200
7.74
Jan-05
0.145
9.750
143.250
15.750
6.98
Feb-05
0.144
33.000
318.000
16.250
7.18
Mar-05
0.208
22.400.
438.800
124.800
7.24
Apr-05
0.184
27.660
287.750
66.000
7.40
May-05
0.169
44.000
496.500
65.250
7.28
Jun-05
0.234
75.600
449.200
88.400
6.76
Jul-05
0.213
27.530
206.145
61.555
7.30
Aug-05
0.248
51.000
330.000
65.600
6.94
Sep-05
0.214
37.050
213.750
27.500
7.03
Oct-05
0.177
25.250
176.000
16.750
7.08
Nov-05
0.155
30.400
170.600
15.400
7.40
Dec-05
0.180
31.750
308.500
24.750
7.40
Jan-06
0.200
27.250
195.000
16.500
6.70
Feb-06
0.157
13.750
217.000
14.750
6.78
Mar-06
0.147
12.600
124.800
26.600
7.00
Apr-06
0.207
49.500
352.750
28.000
7.28
May-06
0.175
30.600
330.600
47.000
6.68
Jun-06
0.164
17.750
119.500
23.000
6.78
Jul-06
0.133
6.175
85.500
12.425
6.78
Average
0.169
28.928
267.111
38.876
7.101
Maximum
0.248
75.600
496.500
124.800
7.740
Minimum
0.094
6.175
85.500
12.425
6.680
Date
Flow (MGD)
BOD
m/I
COD
m/I
TSS
m/l
Jul-04
0.094
45.98
281.55
42.22
Aug-04
0.116
27.63
343.24
40.29
Sep-04
0.139
41.81
347.92
36.99
Oct-04
0.140
7.41
146.94
19.71
Nov-04
0.148
10.47
166.92
24.54
Dec-04
0.129
15.98
352.19
43.86
Jan-05
0.145
8.09
118.80
13.06
Feb-05
0.144
27.44
264.45
13.51
Mar-05
0.208
12.92
253.07
71.98
Apr-05
0.184
18.07
188.02
43.13
May-05
0.169
31.16
351.59
46.21
Jun-05
0.234
38.82
230.64
45.39
Jul-05
0.213
15.52,
116.20
34.70
Aug-05
0.248
24.69
159.74
31.75
Sep-05
0.214
20.77
119.84
15.42
Oct-05
0.177
17.15
119.55
11.38
Nov-05
0.155
23.57
132.29
11.94
Dec-05
0.180
21.14
205.43
16.48
Jan-06
0.200
16.36
117.08
9.91
Feb-06
0.157
10.48
165.35
11.24
Mar-06
0.147
10.25
101.57
21.65
Apr-06.
0.207
28.71
204.63
16.24
May-06
0.175
20.99
226.77
32.24
Jun-06
0.164
13.00
87.53
16.85
Jul-06
0.133
5.57
77.06
11.20
Average
0.169
20.560
195.134
27.275
Maximum
0.248
45.984
352.189
71.976
Minimum
0.094
5.566
77.063
9.906
L, 61, � k. v` J (n ) =
ao.sanyi�
.
is c
1 ¢r°'�o�, ao,J
h/
Flow (MGD) 1 0.5
aquatic life (mg/1) at 0.5 MGD aquatic life (mg/1) at 1.0'MGD aquatic life (Ibs/d) at 0.5 MGD aquatic life (Ibs/d) at 1 MGD ELGs (Ibs/d) based on 24,000 Ibs/d
monthly avq daily max monthly avq daily max monthly avq daily max monthly avq daily max monthly avg daily max
total chromium*
sulfide**
phenol
7.554
11.216
3.829
5.685
31.519
46.800
31.953 _
47.443
1.4
2.9
0.325
0.649
0.163
0.327
1.354
2.709
1.363
2.725
1.4
2.9
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
1.4
2.9
* aquatic life based on chromium III standards
**based on hydrogen sulfide
previous permit Ibs/d
monthly avg daily max
0.04 1.2
0.04 1.2 _
0.04 1.2
Table 1. Project Information
Facility Name
WWTP .Grade
NPDES Permit
Outfall
flow, Qw (MGD)
Receiving Stream
Stream Class
..7Q10s :(cfs)
.7Q10w -(cfs)
3OQ2 (cfs)
QA (cfs)•
Time Period
Data Source(s)
Table 2. Parameters of Concern
Name
Type
Chronic -Modifier: Acute
PQL - Units
:Par01
Sulfide .
NC '
0.002
mg/L-
Par02
-'.`-
.Chromium
N.0
- , '0.05'.
1.022
mg%L;
Pac03
- Fheriols
" A
0001
N
mg/L
Par04
Par05
Par06
Par07
_
P'arO8
.
»Y
Par1b
Par11
;
Par12
Par13
Par14
Par15
npdes rpa, input
10/18/2006
r
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Pharr Yarns, Inc.
NC0004812
Time -Period July 2004 - July 2006
Qw (MGD) 0.5
7Q10S (cfs) 125
7Q10W (cis) 228
30Q2 (cfs) 310
Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cfs) 808
Rec'ving Stream South Fork Catawba River
WWTP Class IV
IWC (%) @ 7Q10S 0.6162
@ 7Q10W 0.3388
@ 30Q2 0.2494
@ QA 0.0958
Stream Class WS-V
Outfall 001
Qw = 0.5 MGD
STANDARDS &
PARAMETER
TYPE
CRITERIA (2)
PQL
Units
REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS-
RECOMMENDED ACTION
lt)
NCWQS/ Y,,FAIII
n # Det. Mar Fred Cw Allowable Cw
Chronic Acute
Acute: N/A
Sulfide
NC
0.002
mg/L
108 13
26.5
_ _ _ _ _
Chronic 0.32
Weekly average limit of ug/I is recommended
-
1/week monitoring is recommended:€
Acute: 1.02
Daily maximum limit of 1020 ug/I is recommended
Chromium
NC
0.1 1.022
mg/L
108 108
2.8
_ _ _ _
1/week rnonitorj rlg is recommended`' _ �:'
_
Chronic 8.11
Acute: N/A
Phenols
A
401 N
mg/L
107 41
0.8
_ _ _�
_ _ _
_
Chronic 0.40
Weekly average limit of 400 ug/I is recommerded
1/week monitoring is recommended:'_, '
Acute: N/A
*Legend. " Freshwater Discharge
C = Carcinogenic
NC = Non -carcinogenic
A =Aesthetic
QS
1
C�IrDrn w ily\ L� C't CA'A ) I
e
I)
npdes rpa, rpa
10/18/2006 1'
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
I Sulfide I Chromium I
Date Data
BDL-112DL
Results
Date
Data
BDL-112DL
Results
1
Jul-04 <
0.04J"
0.0
Std Oev.
1.8102
1
Jul-04
0,003
0.0
Std Dev. 0.1632
2
Jul-04 <
0.3
Mean
1.2665
2
Jul-04
0.020
0.0
Mean 0.0961
3
Jul-04 <
0.9
C.V.
1.4293
3
Jul-04
0.040
0.0
C.V. 1.6990
4
Jul-04 <
1.0
n
108
4
Jul-04
0.134
0.1
n 108
5
Aug-04 <
0.5
5
Aug-04
0.135
0.1
6
Aug-04 <
0.2
Mult Factor =
1.8800
6
Aug-04
0.051
0.1
Mult Factor = 2.0100
7
Aug-04 <
0.3
Max. Value
14.1 rngA
7
Aug-04
0092
0.1
Max. Value 1.4 m1
8
Aug-04 <
0.4
Max. Pred Cw
26.5 mgA
8
Aug-04
0.073
0.1
Max. Prod Cw 2.8 mt
9
Sep-04 <
0.3
9
Sep-04
0.041
0.0
10
Sep-04 <'..
0.9
10
Sep-04
0.285
0.3
11
Sep-04 <
3.60`
1.8
11
Sep-04
0.184
0.2
12
Sep-04 <
1.09
0.5
12
Sep-04
0.045
0.0
13
Sep-04 <
0.82
0.4
13
Sep-04
0.023
0.0
14
OCt-04 <
0.53
0.3
14
OCt-04
0,006
0.0
15
Oct-04 <
0,52
0.3
15
OCt-04
0.010
0.0
16
Oct-04 <
1.00
0.5
16
Oct-04
0.026
0.0
17
Oct-04 <
5.71
2.9
17
Oct-04
0.137
0.1
18
Nov-04 <
1.23
0.8
18
Nov-04
0.027
0.0
19
Nov-04 <
0,95
0.5
19
Nov-04
0.021
0.0
20
Nov-04 <
1.19
0.6
20
Nov-04
0.031
0.0
21
Nov-04 <
1.66
0.8
21
Nov-04
0.180
0.2
22
Dec-04 <
1.60
0.8
22
Dec-04
0.110
0.1
23
Dec-04 <
0.48
0.2
23
Dec-04
0.041
0.0
24
Dec-04 <
2A9
1.2
24
Deo04
0.280
0.3
25
Dec-04 <
2.88
1.4
25
Dec-04
0.448
0.4
26
Dec-04 <
0,68
0.3
26
Dec-04
0.019
0.0
27
Jan-05 <
2.00
1.0
27
Jan-05
0.038
0.0
28
Jan-05 <
2.10
1.0
28
Jan-05
0.019
0.0
29
Jan-05 <
1.14
0.6
29
Jan-05
0.011
0.0
30
Jan-05 <
1224
0.6
30
Jan-05
0.038
0.0
31
Feb-m <
4,85 '
2.4
31
Feb-05
0.169
0.2
32
Feb-05 <
0.59
0.3
32
Feb-05
0.050
0.0
33
Feb-05 <
0.98
0.5
33
Feb-05
0.096
0.1
34
Feb-05 <
0.87
0.4
34
Feb-05
0.087
0.1
35
Mar-05 <
1.23 ;}
0.6
35
Mar-05
0.050
0.0
36
Mar-05
7.19
7.2
36
Mar-05
0.3D9
0.3
37
Mar-05
5A0
5.1
37
Mar-05
0.267
0.3
38
Mar-05
8,35
8.3
38
Mar-05
1.393
1.4
39
Mar-05
1408
14.1
39
Mar-05
0.224
0.2
40
Apr-05 <
1,00,
0.5
40
Apr-05
0.042
0.0
41
Apr-05 <
1,66 ]
0.8
41
Apr-05
0.063
0.1
42
Apr-05
2.00
2.0
42
Apr-05
0.224
0.2
43
Apr-05
3.04
3.0
43
Apr-05
0.116
0.1
44
May-05 <
1,34 j
0.7
44
May-05
0.026
0.0
45
May-05 <
6.37
3.2
45
May-05
0.787
0.8
46
May-05 <
4.94,
2.5
46
May-05
0.364
0.4
47
May-05 <
1.21 ')
0.6
47
May-05
0.123
0.1
48
Jun-05 <
1,58 n
0.8
48
Jun-05
0.120
0.1
49
Jun-05 <
2.41 '
1.2
49
Jun-05
0.058
0.1
50
Jun-05 <
0.28 f9
0.1
50
Jun-05
0.009
0.0
51
Jun-05 <
1.35
0.7
51
Jun-05
0,125
0.1
52
Jun-05 <
3.21 --
1.6
52
Jun-05
0,148
0.1
53
Jul-05 <
0.01 '
0.0
53
Jul-05
0.000
0.0
54
Jul-05 <
0.03 i
0.0
54
Jul-05
0.088
0.1
55
Jul-05
0.03
0.0
55
Jul-05
0.017
0.0
56
Jul-05 <
1.58 i
0.8
56
Jul-05
0.057
0.1
57
Aug-05 <
0.55
0.3
57
Aug-05
0.023
0.0
58
Aug-05 <
0.85 "
0.4
58
Aug 05
0.044
0.0
59
Aug-05 <
1.02 ;
0.5
59
Aug-05
0.070
0.1
60
Aug-05
5.81
5.8
60
Au05
0.144
0.1
61
Aug-05
1.12
1.1
61
Aug-05
0.028
0.0
62
Sep-05
0.76
0.8
62
Sep-05
0.020
0.0
63
Sep-05
2.10
2.1
63
Sep 05
0.058
0.1
64
Sep-05 <
1.28!
0.6
64
Sep-05
0.082
0.1
65
Sep-05 <
1.64 y
0.8
65
Sep-05
0.055
0.1
66
Oct-05 <
0.99 ,_
0.5
66
Oct-05
0.034
0.0
67
Oct-05 <
1,82 .
0.9
67
Oct-05
0,106
0.1
68
Oct-05 <
0.53
0.3
68
Oct-05
0.020
0.0
69
Oct-05 <
1.05
0.5
69
Oct-05
0.063
0.1
70
Nov-05 <
0,61„ t
0.3
70
Nov-05
0.022
0.0
npdes rpa, data
-1
-
10/18/2006
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
Nov-05
Nov-05
Nov-05
Nov-05
Dec 05
Dec-05
Dec05
Dec-05
Jan-06
Jan-06
Jan-06
Jan-06
Feb-08
Feb-06
Feb-06
Feb-06
Mar-06
Mar-06
Mar-06
Mar-06
Mar-06
Apr-06
Apr-06
Apr-06
Apr-06
May-08
May-06
May-06
May-06
May-06
Jun-06
Jun-06
Jun-06
Jun-06
Jul-06
Jul-06
Jul-06
Jul-06
0.2
71
Nov-05
0.028
0.0
0.5
72
Nov-05
0,024
0.0
0.9
73
Nov-05
0,072
0.1
0.9
74
Nov-05
0,074
0.1
0.4
75
Dec-05
0.078
0.1
2.9
76
Dec-05
0.116
0.1
0.4
77
Dec-05
0.102
0.1
0.4
78
Dec-05
0,029
0.0
1.8
79
Jan-06
0.022
0.0
3.9
80
Jan-06
0.181
0.2
0.8
81
Jan-06
0.081
0.1
1.0
82
Jan-06
0.049
0.0
1.1
83
Feb-06
0.060
0.1
1.6
84
Feb-06
0.055
0.1
1.5
85
Feb-06
0.060
0.1
1.0
86
Feb-06
0.043
0.0
1.2
87
Mar-06
0.056
0.1
0.7
88
Mar-06
0.033
0.0
0.9
89
Mar-06
0.063
0.1
1.1
90
Mar-06
0.061
0.1
0.8
91
Mar-06
0.022
0.0
0.9 '
92
Apr 06
0.030
0.0
1.0
93
Apr-06
0.071
0.1
1.7
94
Apr-06
0.099
0.1
1.8
95
Apr-06
0.117
0.1
1.1
96
May-06
0.006
0.0
1.0
97
May-06
0.082
0.1
0.8
98
May-06
0.038
0.0
0.9
99
May-06
0.025
0.0
0.9
100
May-06
0.107
0.1
0.8
101
Jun-06
0.018
0.0
1.8
102
Jun-06
0.025
0.0
0.8
103
Jun-06
0.024
0.0
1.0
104
Jun-06
0.023
0.0
0.2
106
Jul-06
0,002
0.0
1.3
106
Jul-06
0,032
0.0
0.9
107
Jul-06
0.015
0.0
2.0
108
Jul-06
(1041
0.0
109
_2_
npdes rpa, data
10/18/2D06
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Date
Data
BDL-12DL
Results
Jul-04
0.01
0.0
Std Dev.
0.0411
Jul-04
0.10
0.1
Mean
0.0221
Jul-04
0.02
0.0
C.V.
1,8556
Jul-04
0.39
0.4
n
107
Aug-04
0.01
0.0
Aug-04
0.01
0.0
Mult Factor =
2.0800
Aug-04
0.01
0.0
Max. Value
0.4 mg/L
Aug-04
0.01
0.0
Max. Fred Cw
0.8 mg/L
Sep-04
0.01
0.01
Sep-04
0.02
0.02
Sep-04
0.04
0.04
Sep-04
0.01
0.01
Sep-04
0,01
0.01
Oct-04
<
0.01
0.00
Oct-04
<
0.01
0.00
Ott-04
<
0.01
0.01
Oct-04
<
0.06
0.03
Nov-04
<
0.01
0.01
Nov-04
<
0.01
0.00
Nov-04
<
0.01
0.01
Nov-04
<.
0.02
0.01
Dec-04
0.03
0.03
Dec-04
0.01
0.01
Dec-04
<
0.03
0.02
De 04
<
0.03
0.02
Dec-04
0.02
0.02
Jan-05
0.03
0.03
Jan-05
0.05
0.05
Jan-05
0.02
0.02
Jan-05
0.03
0.03
Feb-05
0.05
0.05
Feb-05
0.01
0.01
Feb-05
<
0.02
0.01
Feb-05
0.01
0.01
Mar-05
<
0.01
0.01
Mar-05
<
0.03
0.01
Mar-05
<
0.04
0.02
Mar-05
0.06
0.06
Mar-05
<
0.06
0.03
Apr-05
<
0.01
0.01
Apr-05
<
0.02
0.01
Apr-05
0.02
0.02
Apr-05
<
0.02
0.01
May-05
<
0.01
0.01
May-05
<
0.06
0.03
May-05
<
0.05
0.02
May-05
<
0.01
0.01
Jun-05
<
0.02
0.01
Jun-05
0.03
0.03
Jun-05
Jun-05
0.01
0.01
Jun-05
<
0.03
0.02
Jul-05
0.00
0.00
Jul-05
0.02
0.02
Jul-05
<
0.01
0.01
Jul-05
<
0.01
0.01
Aug-05
<
0.01
0.00
Aug-05
0.01
0.01
Aug-05
0.02
0.02
Aug-05
<
0.03
0.01
Aug-05
<
0.01
0.00
Sep-05
<
0.01
0.00
Sep-05
<
0.02
0.01
Sep-05
<
0.01
0.01
Sep-05
<
0.02
0.01
Oct-05
<
0.01
0.00
Ott-05
<
0.02
0.01
Oct-05
<
0.01
0.00
Oct-05
<
0.01
0.01
Nov-05
<
0.01
0.00
npdes rpa, data
- 3 - 10/18/2006
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
71
Nov-05
<
0.00
0.00
72
Nov-05
<
0,01
0.00
73
Nov-05
0,02
0.02
74
Nov-05
<
0.02
0.01
75
Dec-05
0,01
0.01
76
Dec-05
0.02
0.02
77
Deo-05
004
0.04
78
Dec-05
0.01
0.01
79
Jan-06
<
0.04
0.02
80
Jan-06
<
0.04
0.02
81
Jan-06
<
0.02
0.01
82
Jan-06
<
0.01
0.01
83
Feb-06
0.02
0.02
84
Feb-06
<
0.01
0.01
85
Feb-06
0,07
0.07
86
Feb-06
0.09
0.09
87
Mar-06
<
0,01
0.01
88
Mar-06
<
0,01
0.00
89
Mar-06
<
0.01
0.00
90
Mar-06
<
0,01
0.01
91
Mar-06
<
0.04
0.02
92
Apr-06
0.05
0.05
93
Apr-06
0.10
0.10
94
Apr-06
<
0.09
0.04
95
Apr-06
<
0.09
0.04
96
May-06
<
0,01
0.00
97
May-06
<
0,00
0.00
98
May-06
<
0.04
0.02
99
May-06
<
0,05
0.02
100
May-06
<
0.04
0.02
101
Jun-06
<
0,04
0.02
102
Jun-06
<
0.08
0.04
103
Jun-06
<
0.04
0.02
104
Jun-06
<
0.05
0.03
105
Jul-06
<
0.01
0.00
106
Jul-06
<
0.00
0.00
107
Jul-06
<
0.04
0.02
108
Jul-06
<
0.10
0.05
npdes rpa, data
-4- 10/18/2006
Table 1. Project Information --
Facility Name
WWTP Grade
NPDES Permit
Outfall
Flow, Qw (MGD)
Receiving Stream
Stream Class
7Q10s (cfs)
7Q10w (cfs)
30Q2 (cfs)
QA (cfs)
Time Period
Data Source(s)-
Table 2.. Parameters of Concern
Name - . Type Chronic- Modifier • Acute - PQL : Units
Par01
Sulfide.
' N'C
0.002,
g
Par02
Chromium
NQ
0.05
1.022
mg/L
Par03
Phenols
A•
0.001
N
Mg/L
Par05
..
Par06
Par07
P}ar08
Pa r09
= .
Par10
Par1,1
_
u.
P'ar12
.
Par13
Par14
npdes rpa-1 MGD Floow, input
10/18/2006
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Pharr Yarns, Inc.
NC0004812
Time Period July 2004 - July 2006
Qw (MGD)
1
7Q10S (cfs)
125
7Q10W (cfs)
228
30Q2 (cfs)
310
Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cfs)
808
Rec'ving Stream South Fork Catawba River
WWTP Class N
IWC (%) @ 7Q10S
1.2248
@ 7Q10W
0.6752
@ 30Q2
0.4975
@ QA
0.1915
Stream Class WS-V
Outfall 001
QW = 1 MGD
STANDARDS &
PARAMETER
TYPE
CRITERIA (2)
PQL
Units
REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS
RECOMMENDED ACTION
NCWQS/ %FAV/
n #Det Max FredCw AllowableCw
(t)
Chronic Acute
Acute: N/A
Sulfide
NC
0.002
mg/L
108 13
26.5
_ _ _-_ _
Chronic 0.16
_ _ _ _ _ _ __-
Weekly average limit of 160 ug/I 1s'rgcommended.
1/week monitoring is recommended.''
Acute: 1.02
Daily maximum limit of 1020 ug/I is. recommended.
Chromium
NC
0.1 1.022
mg/L
108 108
2.8
_ _ _ _ -
1/week monitoring is recommended.
---` - — - — — ---.---------------
_
Chronic 4-
Acute: N/A
Phenols
A
0"CM N
mg/L
107 41
0.8
_---- _ --
_ — - — _--
Chronic: 0.20
-- _+_---___ -
Weekly average limit of 200 ugn'is recommended.
1/week monitoring isrecommended, '
Acute: N/A
;
Legend. " Freshwater Discharge
C = Carcinogenic
NC = Non -carcinogenic
A = Aesthetic
W QS
1b�aH�
npdes rpa-1MGD Floow, rpa
10/18/2006
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Sulfide
Chromium
Date Data
BDL=1/2DL
Results
Date
Data
BDL=1/2DL
Results
1
Jul-04 <
0,04 `"
0.0
Std Dev.
1.8102
1
Jul-04
'. 0.003
0.0
Std Dev. 0.1632
2
Jul-04 <
0,55
0.3
Mean
1.2665
2
Jul-04
0.020
0.0
Mean 0.0961
3
Jul-04 <
1.81
0.9
C.V.
1.4293
3
Jul-04
0.040
0.0
C.V. 1.8990
4
Jul-04 <
2,09
1.0
n
108
4
Jul-04
0.134
0.1
n 108
5
Aug-04 <
0.95
0.5
5
Aug-04
0.135
0.1
6
Aug-04 <
0.44 -:
0.2
Mult Factor =
1.8800
6
Aug-04
0.051
0.1
Mult Factor = 2.0100
7
Aug-04 <
0.64
0.3
Max. Value
14.1 rngfl.
7
Aug-04
0.092
0.1
Max. Value 1.4 m
8
Aug-04 <
0.82
0.4
Max. Pred Garr
26.5 rng1.
8
Aug-04
0.073
0.1
Max. Pred Cw 2.8 m
9
Sep-04 <
0.3
9
Sep-04
0.041
0.0
10
Sep-04='
0.9
10
Sep-04
0.265
0.3
11
Sep-04
1.8
11
Sep-04
0.184
0.2
12
Sep-04
0.5
12
Sep-04
0.045
0.0
13
Sep-04
0.4
13
Sep-04
0.023
0.0
14
Oct-04
0.3
14
Oct-04
0.006
0.0
15
Oct-04 a
0.3
15
00t-04
0.010
0.0
16
Oct-04 <
0.5
16
00t-04
0.026
0.0
17
Oct-04 <
2.9
17
Oct-04
0.137
0.1
18
Nov-04 <
"`
0.6
18
Nov-04
0.027
0.0
19
Nov-04 <
0.95j"
0.5
19
Nov-04
0.021
0.0
20
Nov-04 <
1.19
0.6
20
Nov-04
0.031
0.0
21
Nov-04 <
1.66
0.8
21
Nov-04
0,180
0.2
22
Dec-04 <
1.60
0.8
22
Dec-04
0,110
0.1
23
Dec-04 <
0.48
0.2
23
Dec-04
0.041
0.0
24
Dec-04 <
249
1.2
24
DeC-04
0.280
0.3
25
Dec-04 <
2.88
1.4
25
DeC-04
0.448
0.4
26
Dec-04 <
0,88
0.3
26
Deo-04
0.019
0.0
27
Jan-05 <
2,00
1.0
27
Jan-05
0.038
0.0
28
Jan-05 <
2.10
1.0
28
Jan-05
0.019
0.0
29
Jan-05 <
1A4
0.6
29
Jan-05
0.011
0.0
30
Jan-05 <
1.22
0.6
30
Jan-05
0.038
0.0
31
Feb-05 <
4.85
2.4
31
Feb-05
0.169
0.2
32
Feb-05 <
0,59
0.3
32
Feb-05
0,050
0.0
33
Feb-05 <
0.5
33
Feb-05
0.096
0.1
34
Feb-05 " "
0.4
34
Feb-05
0.067
0.1
35
Mar-05
0.6
35
Mar-05
0.050
0.0
36
Mar-05
7.19
7.2
36
Mar-05
0.309
0.3
37
Mar-05
5.10
5.1
37
Mar-05
0.287
0.3
38
Mar-05
8.35
8.3
38
Mar-05
1.393
1.4
39
Mar-05
14.08
14.1
39
Mar-05
: 0.224
0.2
40
Apr-05
0.5
40
Apr-05
0.042
0.0
41
Apr-05
0.8
41
Apr-05
0,063
0.1
42
Apr-05
200
2.0
42
Apr-05
0.224
0.2
43
Apr-05
3.04
3.0
43
Apr-05
0.116
0.1
44
May-05 <
- 1,34 -.',
0.7
44
May105
0.026
0.0
45
`"
May-05 i .37
3.2
45
May-05
r 0.787
0.8
46
May-05
,1
2.6
46
May-05
0.364
0.4
47
May-O
0.8
47
May-05
0.123
0.1
48
Jun-05
0.8
48
Jun-05
0.120
0.1
49
Jun-05
1.2
49
Jun-05
0.058
0.1
50
Jun-05 < 0.
0.1
50
Jun-05
0.009
0.0
51
Jun-05 <
1.35 <1
0.7
51
Jun-05
0.125
0.1
52
Jun-05 <
3,21 ''.
1.6
52
Jun-05
0.148
0.1
53
Jul-05 <
0.01
0.0
53
Jul-05
0.000
0.0
54
Jul-05 <
003 ';
0.0
54
Jul-05
0.088
0.1
55
Jul-05
0.03
0.0
55
Jul-05
0.017
0.0
56
Jul-05 <
1,58
0.8
56
Jul-05
0.057
0.1
57
Aug-05 <
0.55
0.3
57
Aug-05
0.023
0.0
58
Aug-05 <
0.85
0.4
58
Aug-05
0.D44
0.0
59
Aug-05 <
1,02;
0.5
59
Aug-05
0.070
0.1
60
Aug-05
5.81
5.8
60
Aug-05
0.144
0.1
61
Aug-05
1.12
1.1
61
Aug-05
0.028
0.0
62
Sep-05
0.76
0.8
62
Sep-05
0.020
0.0
63
Sep-05
2.10
2.1
63
Sep-05
0.0m
0.1
64
Sep-05 <
1.28"
0.6
64
Sep-05
0.082
0.1
65
Sep-05 <
1,64 {
0.8
65
Sep-05
0.055
0.1
66
Oct-05 <
0,99
0.5
66
Oct-05
0.034
0.0
67
Oct-05 <
1,82
0.9
67
Oct-05
0.106
0.1
68
Oct-05 <
0,53
0.3
68
Oct-05
0.020
0.0
69
Oct-05 <
1,05
0.5
69
Oct-05
0.063
0.1
70
Nov-05 <
0,61 j
0.3
701
Nov-05
0.022
0.0
npdes rpa-1MGD Floow, data
- 1 - 10/18/2006
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
71
Nov-05 <
0.48
0.2
71
Nov-05
0.028
0.0
72
Nov-05 <
0.96
0.5
72
Nov-05
0.024
0.0
73
Nov-05 <
1.89
0.9
73
Nov-05
0.072
0.1
74
Nov-05 <
1.76
0.9
74
Nov-05
0,074
0.1
75
Deo-05 <
0.74
0.4
75
Dec-05
0,078
0.1
76
Deo-05
2.87
2.9
76
Dec-05
0.116
0.1
77
Dec-05 <
0,89 '
0.4
77
Dec-05
0.102
0.1
78
Dm-05 <
0.83
0.4
78
DeC-05
0.029
0.0
79
Jan-06 <
3.66
1.8
79
Jan-06
0.022
0.0
80
Jan-06
3.88
3.9
80
Jan-06
0.181
0.2
81
Jan-06 <
1.68
0.8
81
Jan-06
0.081
0.1
82
Jan-06 <
1.97
1.0
82
Jan-06
0.049
0.0
83
Feb-06 <
2.24
1.1
83
Feb-06
0.060
0.1
84
Feb-06 <
2.94
1.5
84
Feb-06
0.055
0.1
85
Feb-06 <
294
1.5
85
Feb-06
0.060
0.1
86
Feb-06 <
2.02
1.0
86
Feb-06
0.043
0.0
87
Mar-06 <
2.43
1.2
87
Mar-06
0.056
0.1
88
Mar-06 <
1.49
0.7
88
Mar-06
0.033
0.0
89
Mar-06 <
1.82
0.9
89
Mar-06
0.06.3
0.1
90
Mar-06 <
2.30
1.1
90
Mar-06
0.061
0.1
91
Mar-06 <
1.56
0.8
91
Mar-06
0.022
0.0
92
Apr-06 <
1.88
0.9
92
Apr-06
0.030
0.0
93
Apr-06 <
1.91
1.0
93
Apr-06
0.071
0.1
94
Apr-06 <
3.48
1.7
94
Apr-06
0.099
0.1
95
Apr-06 <
3.60
1.8
95
Apr-06
0.117
0.1
96
May-06 <
2
1.1
96
May-06
0.006
0.0
97
May-06 <
`:
1.0
97
May-06
0,082
0.1
98
May-06 <
`"
0.8
98
May-06
0.038
0.0
99
May-06 <
0.9
99
May 06
0.025
0.0
100
May-06 <
0.9
100
May-06
0.107
0.1
101
Jun-06 <
I';^s:
0.8
101
Jun-06
0.016
0.0
102
Jun-06 <
3.
1.8
102
Jun-06
0.025
0.0
103
Jun-06 <
1.55
0.8
103
Jun-06
0,024
0.0
104
Jun.06 <
2,05
1.0
104
Jun-06
0.023
0.0
105
Jul-06 <
0.40 ;
0.2
105
Jul-06
0.002
0.0
106
Jul-06 <
2.69 '.
1.3
106
Jul-06
0.032
0.0
107
Jul-06 <
1.72
0.9
107
Jul-06
0.015
0.0
108
Jul-06 <
4.09 '..
2.0
108
Jul-06
1 o.041
0.0
109
109
npdes rpa-1MGD Floow, data
- 2 - 10/18/2006
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Date
Data
BDL=IPIDL
Results
Jul-04
0.01
0.0
Std Dev.
0.0411
JUI-04
0.10
0.1
Mean
0.0221
Jul-04
0.02
0.0
C.V.
1.8556
Jul-04
0.39
0.4
n
107
Aug-04
0.01
0.0
Aug-04
0.01
0.0
Mu6 Factor =
2,0800
Aug-04
0.01
0.0
Max. Value
0.4 mg/L
Aug-04
0.01
0.0
Max. Pred Cw
0.8 mg/L
Sep-04
0.01
0.01
Sep-04
0.02
0.02
Sep-04
0.04
0.04
Sep-04
0.01
0.01
Sep-04
0.01
0.01
Oct-04
<
0.01
0.00
Oct-04
<
0.01
0.00
Oct-04
<
0.01
0.01
Oct-04
<
0.06
0.03
Nov-04
<
0.01
0.01
Nov-04
<
0.01
0.00
Nov-04
<
0.01
0.01
Nov-04
<
0.02
0.01
Deo04
0.03
0.03
Dec04
0.01
0.01
Dec-04
<
0.03
0.02
Dec-04
<
0.03
0.02
Deo04
0.02
0.02
Jan-05
0.03
0.03
Jan-05
0.05
0.05
Jan-05
0.02
0.02
Jan-05
0.03
0.03
Feb-05
0.05
0.05
Feb-05
0.01
0.01
Feb-05
<
0.02
0.01
Feb-05
0.01
0.01
Mar-05
<
0.01
0.01
Mar-05
<
0.03
0.01
Mar-05
<
0.04
0.02
Mar-05
0.06
0.06
Mar-05
<
0.05
0.03
Apr-05
<
0.01
0.01
Apr-05
<
0.02
0.01
Apr-05
0.02
0.02
Apr-05
<
0.02
0.01
May-05
<
0.01
0.01
May-05
<
0.06
0.03
May-05
<
0.05
0.02
May-05
<
0.01
0.01
Jun-05
<
0.02
0.01
Jun-05
0.03
0.03
Jun-05
Jun-05
0.01
0.01
Jun-05
<
0.03
0.02
Jul-05
0.00
0.00
Jul-05
0.02
0.02
Jul-05
<
0.01
0.01
Jul-05
<
0.01
0.01
Aug-05
<
0.01
0.00
Aug-05
0.01
0.01
Aug-05
0.02
0.02
Aug-05
<
0.03
0.01
Aug-05
<
0.01
0.00
Sep-05
<
0.01
0.00
Sep-05
<
0.02
0.01
Sep-05
<
0.01
0.01
Sep-05
<
0.02
0.01
Oct-05
<
0.01
0.00
Oct-05
<
0.02
0.01
Oct-05
<
0.01
0.00
Oct-05
<
0.01
0.01
Nov-05
<
0.01
0.00
npdes rpa-1 MGD Floow, data
- 3 - 10/18/2006
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
71
Nov-05
< 0.00
0.00
72
Nov-05
< 0.01
0.00
73
Nov-05
0.02
0.02
74
Nov-05
< 0.02
0.01
75
De 05
0.01
0.01
76
Dec-05
0.02
0.02
77
Dec-05
0.04
0.04
78
Dec-05
0.01
0.01
79
Jan-06
< 0.04
0.02
80
Jan-06
< 0.04
0.02
81
Jan-06
< 0.02
0.01
82
Jan-06
< 0.01
0.01
83
Feb-06
0.02
0.02
84
Feb-06
< 0.01
0.01
85
Feb-06
0.07
0.07
86
Feb-06
0.09
0.09
87
Mar-06
< 0.01
0.01
88
Mar-06
< 0.01
0.00
89
Mar-06
< 0.01
0.00
90
Mar-06
< 0.01
0.01
91
Mar-06
< 0.04
0.02
92
Apr-06
0.05
0.05
93
Apr-06
0.10
0.10
94
Apr-06
< 0.09
0.04
95
Apr-06
< 0.09
0.04
96
May-06
< 0.01
0.00
97
May-06
< 0.00
0.00
98
May-06
< 0.04
0.02
99
May-06
< 0.05
0.02
100
May-06
< 0.04
0.02
101
Jun-06
< 0.04
0.02
102
Jun-06
< 0.08
0.04
103
Jun-06
< 0.04
0.02
104
Jun-06
< 0.05
0.03
105
Jul-06
< 0.01
0.00
106
Jul-06
< 0.00
0.00
107
Jul-06
< 0.04
0.02
108
Jul-06
< 0.10
0.05
npdes rpa-1 MGD Flo , data
- 4 - 10/18/2006
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY „ 1
�� A >W REGION 4 Vl
ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER 1+
;M o= 61 FORSYTH STREET V,
144 PmotE` ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-8960
r,rli 1 9 2006
;t
Ms. Jackie Nowell
North Carolina Department of Environment and
Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
SUBJ: Draft NPDES Permit Modification
Pharr Yarns WWTP - Permit No. NC0004812
Dear Ms. Nowell:
In accordance with the EPA/NCDENR NPDES MOA, we have completed review of the
draft permit modification specified above and have no comments or objections to its conditions.
We request that we be afforded an additional review opportunity only if significant changes are
made to the draft permit modification prior to issuance or if significant comments objecting to it
are received. Otherwise, please send us one copy of the final permit modification when issued.
If you have any questions, please call me at (404) 562-9304.
Sincerely,
Marshall Hyatt, Environmental Scientist
Permits, Grants, and Technical Assistance Branch
Water Management Division
Internet Address (URL) • http://www.spa.gov
Recycled/Recyclable • Printed with Vegetable 00 Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 30 % Postconsumen
APR 13 2006 16:05 FR CLT OBSERVER AD
70435e5340 TO 919197330719827i3 P.01i01
I o r°
FrD r is4e4
Ville (ffi S al;;
5688843 SAT 04/15
TGic�rrlc yo � �
0
CP6 2.00X 3.14
PUBLIC
STATE OF NORTHTim CAROLINA
ENVIRONMENTAL, MANAGEMENT COMMISSION/NPDES UNIT
1617 MAIL,SERVICE CENTER
NOTIFICATIONHOF LATENT TO ISSUE A
NPDES WASTEWATER PERMIT
On the basis cf thorough staff review and application of NC General
Statute 143.21, Public Law 92-500 and other lawful standards and reg-
ulations, the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission
proposes to issue a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) wastewater discharge permit to the person(s) listed below
effective 45 days from the publish date of this notice.
Written comments regarding the proposed permit will be accepted
until 30 days after the publish date of this notice. All comments
received prior to that date are considered in the final determinations
regarding the proposed permit. The Director of the NC Division of
Waste Water Quality may decide to hold a public meeting for the pro-
posed permit should the Division receive a significant degree of pub lic interest.
Copies of the draft permit and other supporting information on file
used to determine conditions present in the draft permit are available upon request and payment of the costs of reproduction. Mail com-
ments and/or requests for information to the NC Division of Water
Oualiry at the above address or call Ms. Carolyn Bryant (919) 733-
.5083, extension 383 or Ms. Frances Calendaria (919) 733-5083, eaten
sion 520 at the Point Source Branchmit. Please include the NPDES per-
ersons ma
also visit the Division numbr (attached) Hof Water Quality n any tacn. Interet 512 N. StedS l sbury Street Raleigh, NC 27604-1148 between the hours of 6:00 a.m, and 5:00
p.m. to review information on file.
Pharr Yarns (100 Main. Street, McAdenville, NC 26101) has applied for
a modification of NPDES permit NC0004812 for the Pharr Yarns
WWTP in Gaston. This permitted facility discharges treated waste-
water to the South Fork Catawba River in the Catawba River Basin.
Currently BOD, TSS, COD, sulfide, toter nitrogen, total phosphorus
and total residual chlorine are water quality limited. This discharge
may affect future allocations in this portion of the Catawba River
Basin.
LP568B843
44 Lines
PsPC,.
Properties Subsidiary Publications ClassifirN Ir
NCDENR/DWQ/NPDES
A D N U M B E R
5688843
R U N D A T F
** TOTAL PAGE.01 **
PUBLIC NOTICE "
STATE OF NORTH
CAROLINA�
ENVIRONMENTA MAN-
AGEMENT' COM SIONI
1617 MAIL :,SER CE
CENTER'. ;• ,
'RALEIGM, OC 27699-1617
AFFIDAVIT OF INSERTION OF-
TENT -TO 4- SU IN -
A
TENT; '•TOISSUE •A
NPDES
ADVERTISEMENT
.,WASTEWATER
,PERMIT,',-•
On the basis of thorough
The Gaston Gazette
staff review and application
Statute
of. NC . General,
143.21, Public law 92-500
and other lawful standards
and regulations, the North
Carolina Environmental
management : Commission
proposes to -issue a nation-
al.. Pollutant- Discharge
Gastonia, NC
Elimination: System
(NPDES) wastewater dis-
Gaston County
charge,' permit, ,to..th6 per-
;sons(s)',Iisted'Below effea-
five 45; days' from the.pub-
I, Melissa Birchfield Legal Advertising Clerk of the The Gaston Gazette, do certify th; lish date,of;this notice:
the advertisement of
the
Written comments: regard -
the;proposed permit will
PUBLIC NOTICE
'be - accepted :until':3o days
after the publlsh,date of this
NOTIFICATION OF INTENT TO ISSUE A NPDES
notice."All 4gimmentsre-
ceived..pnor tcf that date are
WASTEWATER PERMIT
considered in the final de-
terminabons" regarding the
proposed , permit. The, Di-
rector of the NC Division of
Water, Quality may decide
to hold a public'meeting for
Measuring 10.35 inches appeared in The Gaston Gazette, newspaper published in Gast the proposed permit Should
County, Gastonia, NC, In issuesthe
Division receive a sig-
nificant degree` of publib in-'
terest.'+
Copies, of'the'Araft''permit
and other•: supporting. infor-
APRIL 14 2006
mation"orr file.:used'to: de-
termine conditions'present
in the draft -permit are avail-
able Upon:re9uest and•pay-:
meet of the costs of repro-
ductldk. Mail' comments
? 1
anrequa�sts, for infor-
mation foafV -e C Division
Me issa Birchfield
of. Water .Quality, ;at . the
above'.address'or call the
Leaa dvertisinQ Clerk
Point Source : Branch : at
(919) 733-5083,. extension
f
520. Please • include the
NPDES_, permit
Sworn to' and subscribed before me this day o 20C
_number
in any bom-
,(NC0004812).
munication.:Interested per,
sons, may, alspAit,the: Di=
Waibuii. Str at
vi12
N -f,
512, :N,;.Salis6ury.• Street;
1
Raleigh,,,, Nc,;;,27604-1'148
between the hours of 8;00.
Carla Norris Potter, Notary Public
:a.m. and 5:06 p.m. to. re=
view.information,on file.,;.
My Commission Expires September 14, 2008
:.
'Pharir` :Yarlis:," F(100-` Main
Street ',tutcAdenvil1% N.C'
28101)` has:14pplied for a
modification, of. NPDES per;
�f'�,j/f(/
and NC0004812,' for the
Pharr Yarns WWtP `•in
Gaston. Phis perrhitted.facil-
ity 'discharges.,, -treated
wastewater.. to . the South
ForkCatawba.)River in the
Catawba; River,Basin: Cur•
rentiyi.'BbD;':TSS" COD,
sulfide, total.pitrogen,.,tota
phosphorus, arld total resid-
uat.chbdne' are water Aual•
"discharge
ity, limited. This
may affect future allooa•
tions in this portion of the
Catawba River Basin.
1C-April 14,:2006 '
�4 U
- we-,W/W/*US
r
�/E �vv�►� �tEli�/t U �.�,y
ScDff.�Z
Flow (MGD) 1 0.5
aquatic life (mg/1) at 0.5 MGD aquatic life (mg/1) at 1.0 MGD I aquatic life lbs/d at 0.5 MGD aquatic life lbs/d at 1 MGD
mnnthht min HAW max mnnthiv nva daily max I monthly avo daily max monthly avg daily max
total chromium*
sulfide**
phenol
7.554
11.216
3.829
5.685
31.519
46.800
31.953
47.443
0.325
0.649
0.163
0.327
1.354
2.709
1.363
2.725
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
na
* aquatic life based on chromium III standards
**based on hydrogen sulfide
ELGs Ibs/d based on 24,000 Ibs/d
I xevious permit (Ibs/d)
monthiv avq dailV max
ImonthlVavg dail max
1.4
2.9 9
0
1.4
2.
1.2
1.4
2.9
P44 Atl
1.2
o, y 4 z,
n,$_ 23J J
O,Y_ 1,Z,IIi®
.Cirs <. w� .217 4f/e
Alf Ile
!/L ✓
/tv .0ow y
lam-/1 7 /� �%✓G s�� �,✓c�,
W P
k.
Zoo
a 7r�'; C,14s
Nltl"L Sao ^ &AIV 6
��.� 4i ,,7d,
DAILY AVERAGES
Date
Flow
MGD(lb/day)
BOD
COD
(lb/day)
TSS
(lb/day)
pH (su)
Sulfide
(lb/day.).(lb/day)
Phenol
Chromium
(lb/day)
Jul-04
0.289
4.2
34.9
1.4
7.3
0.1
0.001
0.0084
Jul-04
0.247
18.
216.
66.
7.1
1.13
0.02
0.041
Jul-04
0.106
80.
375.
50.
6.9
1.6
0.016
0.035
Jul-04
0.085
42.
257.
15.
6.9
1.48
0.028
0:095
Aug-04
0.139
31.'
413.
35.
7.1
1.1
0.011
0.157
Aug-04
0.192
22.
263.
19.
6.5
0.7
0.007
0.081
Aug-04
0.224
38.
403.
60.
7.5
1.2
0.012
0.172
Aug-04
0.161
16.
250.
42.
7.6
1.1
0.011
0.098
Sep-04
0.279
24.
230.
40.
7.4
1.48,
0.016
0.096
Sep-04'
0.082
43.
459.
126.
7.6
1.25
0.013
0.181
Sep-04
0.047
107.
599.
27.
7.6
1.41
0.014
0.072
Sep-04
0.225
33.
486.
14.
7.6
2.04
0.02
0.084
Sep-04
0.161
36.
248.
8.
7.1
1.1
0.017
0.031
Oct-04
0.147
1.2
126.
5.2
7.2
0.65
0.007
0.007
Oct-04
0.176
3.
120.
al
7.2
0.76
0.008
0.015
Oct-04
0.142
3.5
136.
15.
6.9
1.18
0.012
0.031
Oct-04
0.055
21.
306.
63.
6.7
2.62
0.026
0.063
Nov-04
0.084
&1
78.
11.
7.
0.86
0.009
0.019
Nov-04
0.171
9.5
197.
19.
7.
1.35
0.014
0.03
Nov-04
0.135
4.
150.
12.
6.9
1.34
0.013
0.035
Nov-04
0.142
33.
398.
79.
7.7
1.97
0.02
0.213
Dec-04
0.165
13.
354.
40.
7.2
2.2
0.046
0.152
Dec-04
0.119
10.
144.
23.
7.6
0.48
0.011
0.041
Dec-04
0.063 "
26.
733.
65.
7.9
1.31
0.017
0.147
Dec-04
0.065
31.
613.
89.
8.5
1.56
0.017
0.243
Dec-04
0.102
6.
51.
19.
7.5
0.58
0.019
0.016
Jan-05
0.131
186.
37.
7.3
2.19
0.037
0.042
Jan-05
0.107
11.
108.
6.7
1.87
0.047
0.017
Jan-05
0.129
4.
61.
11.
6.9
1.23
0.023
0:012
Jan-05
0.116
24.
218.
15.
7.
1.18
0.026
0.037
Feb-05
0.022
37.
188.
31.
6.9
0.89
0.009
0.031
Feb-05
0.222
72.
433.
13.
7.2
1.1
0.013
0.092
Feb-05
0.117
14.
391.
11.
7.3
0.96
0.017
0.094 `
Feb-05
0.122
9.
260.
10.
7.3
0.89
0.012
0.068
Mar-05
0.132
9.
207.
9.
7.1
1.35
0.014
0.055
Mar-05
0.062
19.
314.
87.
7.4
3.72
0.014
0.16
Mar-05
0.078
28.
936.
114.
7.4
3.32
0.028
0.174
Mar-05
0.026
20. >
548.
388.
7.6
1.81
0.012
0.302
Mar-05
0.031
36.
189.
26.
6.7
3.64
0.014
0.058
Apr-05
0.2
8.8
188.
42.
7.4
1.76
0.018
0.07
Apr-05
0.142
9.84
173.
30.
7.4
1.97
0.02
0.075
Apr-05
0.115
33.
497.
175.
7.6
1.92
0.019
0.215
Apr-05
0.094
59.
293.
17.
7.2
2.38
0.017
0.091
May-05
0.134
5.
127.
17.
6.8
1.5
0.015
0.029
May-05
0.032
60.
506.
190.
7.9
1.7
0.017
0.21
May-05
0.051
81.
1055.
21.
7.3
2.1
0.021
0.155
May-05
0.158
30.
298.
33.
7.1
1.6
0.016
0.162
Jun-05
0.222
73.
599.
147.
7.2
2.93
0.029
0.223
DAILY AVERAGES
Date
Flow
MGD(mg/1)
BOD
COD
(mg/1)
TSS
m I(mall)
Sulfide
Phenol
m I
Chromiu
mm
Jul-04
0.289
1.74
14.48
0.58
0.04
0.00
0.003
Jul-04
0.247
8.74
104.86
32.04
0.55
0.01
0.020
Jul-04
0.106
90.49
424.19
56.56
1.81
0.02
0.040
Jul-04
0.085
59.25
362.53
21.16
2.09
0.04
0.134
Aug-04
0.139
26.74
356.26
30.19
0.95
0.01
0.135
Aug-04
0.192
13.74
164.24
11.87
0.44
0.D0
0.051
Aug-04
0.224
20.34
215.72
32.12
0.64
0.01
0.092
Aug-04
0.161
11.92
186.19
31.28
0.82
0.01
0.073
Sep-04
0.279
10.31
98.85
17.19
0.64
0.01
0.041
Sep-04
0.082
62.88
671.17
184.24
1.83
0.02
0.265
Sep-04
0.047
272.97
1528.14
68.88
3.60
0.04
0.184
Sep-04
0.225
17.59
258.99
7.46
1.09
0.01
0.045
Sep-04
0.161
26.81
184.70
5.96
0.82
0.01
0.023
Oct-04
0.147
5.87
102.77
4.24
0.53
0.01
0.006
Oct-04
0.176
2.04
81.75
6.20
0.52
0.01
0.010
Oct-04
0.142
2.96
114.84
12.67
1.00
0.01
0.026
Oct-04
0.055
45.78
667.10
137.34
5.71
0.06
0.137
Nov-04
0.084
7.28
111.34
15.70
1.23
0.01
0.027
Nov-04
0.171
6.66
138.14
13.32
0.95
0.01
0.021
Nov-04
0.135
3.55
133.23
10.66
1.19
0.01
0.031
Nov-04
0.142
27.87
336.07
66.71
1.66
0.02
0.180
Dec-04
0.165
9.45
257.25
29.07
1.60
0.03
0.110
Dec-D4
0.119
10.08
145.09
23.17
0.48
0.01
0.041
Dec-04
0.063
49.48
1395.07
123.71
2.49
0.03
0.280
Dec-04
0.065
57.19
1130.79
164.18
2.88
0.03
0.448
Dec-04
0.102
7.05
59.95
22.34
0.68
0.02
0.019
Jan-05
0.131
170.25
33.87
2.00
0.03
0.038
Jan-05
0.107
12.33
121.02
2.10
0.05
0.019
Jan-05
0.129
3.72
56.70
10.22
1.14
0.02
0.011
Jan-05
0.116
24.81
225.34
15.50
1.22
0.03
0.038
Feb-05
0.022
201.66
1024.63
168.96
4.85
0.05
0.169
Feb-05
0.222
38.89
233.87
7.02
0.59
0.01
0.050
Feb-05
0.117
14.35
400.71
11.27
0.98
0.02
0.096
Feb-05
0.122
8.85
255.53
SIM
0.87
0.01
0.067
Mar-05
0.132
8.18
188.03
8.18
1.23
0.01
0.050
Mar-05
0.062
36.74
607.26
168.25
7.19
0.03
0.309
Mar-05
0.078
43.04
1438.85
175.24
5.10
0.04
0.267
Mar-05
0.026
92.23
2527.21
1789.34
8.35
0.06
1.393
Mar-05
0.031
139.24
731.03
100.56
14.08
0.05
0.224
Apr-05
0.2
5.28
112.71
25.18
1.06
0.01
0.042
Apr-05
0.142
8.31
146.08
25.33
1.66
0.02
0.063
Apr-05
0.115
34.41
518.19
182.46
2.00
0.02
0.224
Apr-05
0.094
75.26
373.74
21.68
3.04
0.02
0.116
May-05
0.134
4.47
113.64
15.21
1.34
0.01
0.026
May-05
0.032
224.82
1895.98
711.93
6.37
0.06
0.787
May-05
0.051
190.44
2480.37
49.37
4.94
0.05
0.364
May-05
0.158
22.77
226.15
25.04
1.21
0.01
0.123
Jun-05
0.222
39.43
323.52
79.40
1.58
0.02
0.120
Jun-05
0.107
58.27
263.34
26.89
2.41
0.03
0.058
Jun-05
0.706
2.72
26.32
24.46
0.28
0.00
0.009
Jun-05
0.197
94.34
567.26
43.21
1.35
0.01
0.125
Jun-05
0.077
127.69
506.09
87.20
3.21
0.03
0.148
Jul-05
0.346
0.04
0.55
0.08
0.01
0.00
0.000
Jul-05
0.239
20.07
188.13
79.27
0.03
0.02
0.088
Jul-05
0.204
14.69
134.60
30.56
0.03
0.01
0.017
Jul-05
0.162
33.31
162.09
26.65
1.58
0.01
0.057
Aug-05
0.565
22.28
98.89
34.59
0.55
0.01
0.023
Aug-05
0.267
16.17
101.04
23.35
0.85
0.01
0.044
Aug-05
0.282
12.33
131.81
10.20
1.02
0.02
0.070
Aug-05
0,095
44.18
388.74
88.35
5.81
0.03
0.144
Aug-05
0.385
15.57
106.20
5.92
1.12
0.01
0.028
Sep-05
0.276
1.39
37.36
4.78
0.76
0.01
0.020
Sep-05
0.171
11.22
86.95
16.13
2.10
0.02
0.058
Sep-05
0.23
31.80
243.98
29.19
1.28
0.01
0.082
Sep-05
0.186
43.84
114.10
12.89
1.64
0.02
0.055
Oct-05
0.219
9.31
81.58
7.12
0.99
0.01
0.034
Oct-05
0.132
21.80
147.16
18.17
1.82
0.02
0.106
Oct-05
0.388
14.83
69.84
5.25
0.53
0.01
0.020
Oct-05
0.195
7.38
102.69
10.45
1.05
0.01
0.063
Nov-05
0.332
8.67
31.06
6.14
0.61
0.01
0.022
Nov-05
0.397
21.14
40.17
4.83
0.48
0.00
0.028
Nov-05
0.212
9.61
102.37
9.61
0.96
0.01
0.024
Nov-05
0.108
26.65
276.45
16.65
1.89
0.02
0.072
Nov-05
0.116
17.57
210.87
12.40
1.76
0.02
0.074
Dec-05
0.162
9.62
197.62
8.14
0.74
0.01
0.078
Dec-05
0.142
35.46
411.22
33.78
2.87
0.02
0.116
Dec-05
0.135
52.40
371.26
37.30
0.89
0.04
0.102
Dec-05
0.145
10.75
51.27
4.96
0.83
0.01
0.029
Jan-06
0.072
21.65
51.63
36.64
3.66
0.04
0.022
Jan-06
0.047
58.68
670.95
28.06
3.88
0.04
0.181
Jan-06
0.153
41.54
244.51
11.76
1.68
0.02
0.081
Jan-06
0.178
13.47
117.21
12.13
1.97
0.01
0.049
Feb-06
0.155
4.64
137.70
7.74
2.24
0.02
0.060
Feb-06
0.167
10.77
154.37
8.62
2.94
0.01
0.055
Feb-06
0.167
17.23
196.01
17.23
2.94
0.07
0.060
Feb-06
0.196
6.12
123.57
7.95
2.02
0.09
0.043
Mar-06
0.153
9.40
130.09
8.62
2.43
0.01
0.056
Mar-06
0.079
3.04
71.34
13.66
1.49
0.01
0.033
Mar-06
0.198
7.27
123.54
43.00
1.82
0.01
0.063
Mar-06
0.168
22.13
118.48
22.13
2.30
0.01
0.061
Mar-06
0.211
3.41
23.30
6.25
1.56
0.04
0.022
Apr-06
0.237
7.59
62.23
21.75
1.88
0.05
0.030
Apr-06
0.252
32.36
227.44
10.47
1.91
0.10
0.071
Apr-06
0.143
31.02
250.71
12.58
3.48
0.09
0.099
Apr-06
0.134
69.79
457.25
28.63
3.60
0.09
0.117
May-06
0.204
19.40
238.63
41.14
2.27
0.01
0.006
May-06
0.248
15.47
193.88
43.03
1.91
0.00
0.082
May-06
0.236
8.64
85.36
16.26
1.54
0.04
0.038
May-06
0.177
23.03
105.00
18.97
1.83
0.05
0.025
May-06
0.263
16.87
238.44
7.29
1.78
0.04
0.107
Jun-06
0.232
18.61
106.47
5.17
1.51
0.04
0.016
Jun-06
0.127
14.16
100.08
12.27
3.54
0.08
0.025
Jun-06
0.252
6.19
52.81
27.12
1.55
0.04
0.024
Jun-06
0.158
5.31
41.74
9.11
2.05
0.05
0.023
Jul-06
0.23
0.99
7.82
1.41
0.40
0.01
0.002
Jul-06
0.137
2.71
72.64
15.75
2.69
0.00
0.032
Jul-06
0.235
3.42
66.33
6.12
1.72
0.04
0.015
Jul-06
0.113
13.79
120.97
18.04
4.09
0.10
0.041
0.71 1 272.97 1 2527.21 1 1789.34 1 14.08 1 0.10 1 1.39
k Lk-
Jun-05
0.107
52.
235.
24.
6.6
2.15 .
0.028
0.052
Jun-05
0.706
16.
155.
144.
6.7
1.63
0.016
0.052
Jun-05
0.197
155.
932.
71.
6.7
2.22
0.024
0.206
Jun-05
0.077
82.
325.
56.
6.6
2.06
0.021
0.095
Jul-05
0.346
0.12
1.58
0.22
7.1
0.017
0.0002
0.0007
Jul-05
0.239
40.
375.
158.
7.1
0:06
0.047
0.175
Jul-05
0.204
25.
229.
52.
7.2
0.05
0.02
0.029
Jul-05
0.162
45.
219.
36.
7.8
2.14
0.02
0.077
Aug-05
0.565
1051
466.
163.
6:9
2.6
0.026
0.108
Aug-05
0.267
36.
225.
52.
6.8
1.9
0.027
0.099
Aug-05
0.282
29.
310.
24.
7.
2.4
0.044
0.164
Aug-05
0.095
35.
308.
70.
7.1
4.6
0.022
0.114
Aug-05
0.385
50.
341.
19.
6.9
3.6
0.024
0.091
Sep-05
0.276
3.2
86.
11.
7.8
1.75
0.016
0.046
Sep-05
0.171
16.
124.
23.
6.7
2.99
0.023
0.083
Sep-05
0.23
61.
468.
56.
6.7
2.45
0.025
0.157 '
Sep-05
0.186
68.
177.
20.
6.9
2.54
0.025
.0.086
Oct-05
0.219
17.
149.
13.
6.6
1.8
0.018
0.063
Oct-05
0.132
24.
162.
20.
7.2
2
0.02
0.117
Oct-05
0.388
48.
226.
17.
7.4
1.7
0.017
0.065
Oct-05
0.195
12.
167.
17.
7.1
1.7
0.017
0.103
Nov-05
0.332'
24.
86.
17.
7.4
-1.7
0.017
0.06
Nov-05
0.397
70.
133.
16.
7.2
1.6
0.016
0.092
Nov705
0.212
17.
181.
17.
6.9
1.7
0.017
0.043
Nov-05
0.108
24.
249.
15.
7.8
1.7
0.019
0.065
Nov-05
0.116
17.
204.
12.
7.7
1.7
0.017
0.072
Dec-05
0.162
13.
267.
11.
7.8
1
0.02
0.105
Dec-05
0.142
42.
487.
40.
7.6
3:4
0.019
0.137
Dec-05
0.135
59.
418.
42.
7.6
1
0.042
0.115
Dec-05
0.145
13.
62.
6.
6.6
1
0.01
0.035
Jan-06
0.072
13.
31.
22. -
7.
2.2
0.022
0.013
Jan-06
0.047
23.
263.
11.
6.6
1.52
0.015
0.071
Jan-06
0.153
53.
312.
15.
6.7
2.15
0.022
0.103
Jan-06
0.178
20.
174.
18.
6.5
2.92
0.015
0.072
Feb-06
0.155
6.
178.
10.
6.7
2.9
0.0287
0.077
Feb-06
0.167
15.
2' 5.
12.
6.8
4.1
0.014
0.077
Feb-06
0.167
24.
273.
24.
6.8
4.1
0.1023
0.083
Feb-06
0.196
10.
202.
13.
6.8
3.3
0.1454
0.07
Mar-06
0.153
12.
166.
11.
6.9
3.1
0.016
0.071
Mar-06
0.079
2.
47.
9.
6.8
0.98
0.005
0.022
Mar-06
0.198
12.
204.
71.
7.
3
0.015
0.104
Mar-06
0.168
31.
166.
31.
7.4
3.22
0.016
0.085
Mar-06
0.211
6.
41.
11.
6.9
2.75
0.069
0.038
Apr-06
0.237
15.
123.
43.
7.2
3.72
0.105
0.06
Apr-06
0.252
68.
478:
22.
7.4
4.02
0.201
0.149
Apr-06
0.143
37.
299.
15.
7.2
4.15
0.104
0.118
Apr-06
0.134
78.
511.
32.
7.3
4.02
0.1
0.131
May-06
0.204
33.
406.
70.
6.7
3.87
0.01
0.01
May-06
0.248
32.
401.
89.
6.7
3.95
0.01
0.17
May-06
0.236
17.
168.
32.
6.7
3.04
0.076
0.074
May-06
0.177
34.
155.
28.
6.6
2.7
0.067
0.037
May-06
0.263
37.
523.
16.
6.7
3.9
0.098
0.234
Jun-06
0.232
36.
206.
10.
6.8
2.92
0.07
0.031
Jun-06
0.127
15.
106.
13.
6.9
3.75
0.09
0.026
Jun-06
0.252
13.
111.
57.
6.7
3.25
0.08
0.05
Jun-06
0.158
7.
55.
12.
6.7
2.7
0.07
0.03
Jul-06
0.23
1.9
15.
2.7
6.8
0.76
0.019
0.003
Jul-06
0.137
3.1
83.
18.
6.7
3.07
0.037
Jul-06
0.235
6.7
130.
12.
6.8
3.37
0.084
0.03
Jul-06
0.113
13.
114.
17.
6.8
3.85
0.096
0.039
Average
0.17
29.73
271.65
40.61
7.10
2.08
0.03
0.09
Maximum
0.71
155.00
1055.00
388.00
8.50
4.60
0.20
0.30
Minimum
0.02
0.12
1.58
0.22
6.50
0.02
0.00
0.00
MONTHLY AVERAGES
Date
Flow
(MGD)
SOD
(lb/day)
COD
(lb/day)
TSS
(lb/day)
pH (su)
SuN1de
(INday)
Phenol
(lb/day)
Chromiu
m (lb/day)
Jul-04
0.094
36.05
220.73
33.10
7.05
0.00
0.12
0.04
Aug-04
0.116
26.75
332.25
39.00
7.18
0.00
0.00
0.13
Sep-04
0.139
48.60
404.40
43.00
7.46
0.00
0.01
0.09
OCt-04
0.140
8.68
172.00
23.08
7.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
Nov-04
0.148
12.90
205.75
30.25
7.15
0.00
0.00
0.07
Dec-04
0.129
17.20
379.00
47.20
7.74
0.00
0.02
0.12
Jan-05
0.145
SYS
143.25
15.75
6.98
0.00
0.03
0.03
Feb-05
0.144
33.00
318.00
16.25
7.18
0.00
0.01
0.07
Mar-05
0.208
22.40
438.80
124.80
7.24
2.50
0.00
0.15
Apr-05
0.184
27.68
287.75
66.00
7.40
1.08
0.00
0.11
May-05
0.169
44.00
496.50
65.25
7.28
0.00
0.00
0.14
Jun-05
0.234
75.60
449.20
88.40
6.76
0.00
0.01
0.13
Jul-05
0.213
27.53
206.15
61.56
7.30
0.01
0.01
0.07
Aug-05
0.248
51.00
330.00
65.60
6.94
1.64
0.01
0.12
Sep-05
0.214
37.05
213.75
27.50
7.03
1.19
0.00
0.09
Ott-05
0.177
25.25
176.00
16.75
7.08
0.00
0.00
0.09
Nov-05
0.155
30.40
170.60
15.40
7.40
0.00
0.00
0.07
Dec-05
0.180
31.75
308.50
24.75
7.40
0.85
0.02
0.10
Jan-06
0.200
27.25
195.00
16.50
6.70
0.38
0.00
0.06
Feb-06
0.157
13.75
217.00
14.75
6.78
0.00
0.07
0.08
Mar-06
0.147
12.60
124.80
26.60
7.00 -
0.00
0.00
0.06
Apr-06
0.207
49.50
352.75
28.00
7.28
0.00
0.08
0.11
May-06
0.175
30.60
330.60
47.00
6.68
0.00
0.00
0.11
Jun-06
0.164
17.75
119.50
23.00
6.78
0.00
0.00
0.03
Jul-D6
0.133
6.18
85.50
1 12.43
6.78
0.00
1 0.00
0.03
Average
0.17
28.93
267.11
38.33
7.170
0.31
0.02
0.09
Maximum
0.25
75.60
496.50
124.80
1
7.74
2.50
0.12
0.15
Minimum
0.09
6.18
85.50
12.43
6.68
0.00
0.00
0.03
MONTHLY AVERAGES
Date
Flow (MGD)
BOD
Img/1)
COD
(Mgt[)
TSS
(mgl)
Sulfide
(mgn)
Phenol
(m9/1)
Chromiu
m (MCA)
Jul-04
Aug-04
Sep-04
Oct-04
Nov-04
Dea04
Jan-05
Feb-05
Mar-05
Apr-05
May-05
Jun-05
Jul-05
Aug-05
SOP-05
Oct-05
NOV-05
Dec-05
Jan-06
Feb-06
Mar-06
Apr-06
May-06
Jun-06
Jul-06
0.094
0.116
0.139
0.140
0.148
0.129
0.145
0.144
0.208
0.184
0.169
0.234
0.213
0.248
0.214
0.177
0.155
0.180
0.200
0.157
0.147
0.207
0.175
0.164
0.133
45.98
27.63
41.81
7.41
10.47
15.98
8.09
27.44
12.92
18.07
31.18
38.82
15.52
24.69
20.77
17.15
23.57
21.14
16.36
10.48
10.25
28.71
20.99
13.00
1 5.57
281.55
343.24
347.92
146.94
168.92
352.19
118.80
264.45
253.07
188.02
351.59
230.64
116.20
159.74
119.84
119.55
132.29
205.43
117.08
165.35
101.57
204.63
226.77
87.53
77.06
42.22
40.29
36.99
19.71
24.54
43.86
13.06
13.51
71.98
43.13
46.21
45.39
34.70
31.75
15.42
11.38
11.94
16.48
9.91
11.24
21.65
16.24
32.24
16.85
11.20
0.00
0.15
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.13
0.00
0.01
0.08
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.01
0.11
0.00
0.03
0.02
0.00
0.01
0.06
1.44
0.00
0.09
0.70
0.00
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.10
0.00
0.01
0.06
0.01
0.01
0.04
0.79
0.01
0.06
0.66
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.00
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.57
0.02
0.07
0.23
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.05
0.06
0.00
0.00
0.05
0.00
0.04
0.07
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.00
1 0.00
1 0.03
0.00
1 0.00
1 0.02
Average
Maximum
Minimum
0.17
0.25
0..
20.56
45.98
5.571
195.13
352.19
77.06
27.28
71.98
9.911
0.18
1."
0.00
0.01
0.15
0.00
0.06
0.13
0.02
Org Name Station ID
Activity Start
Activity Del Activity
Del Characteri: Sample Fr Result Valt Units
Analytical Proc ID
NCDENR-I C6500000
11/20/2002 11:30
0.1 m
Copper
Total
3.4 ug/I
USEPA
-220.2
NCDENR-1 C6500000
2/13/2003 12:10
0.1 m
Copper
Total
2.8 ug/I
USEPA
-220.2
NCDENR-1 C6500000
51221200313:20
0.1 m
Copper
Total
26 ug/l
USEPA
-220.2
NCDENR-1 C6500000
8/14/2003 11:45
0.1 m
Copper
Total
3.1 ug/I
USEPA
-220.2
NCDENR-1 C6500000
11/13/2003 10:00
0.1 m
Copper
Total
2.3 ug/l
USEPA
-220.2
NCDENR-1 C6500000
2/12/2004 13:30
0.1 m
Copper
Total
2.6 ug/I
USEPA-
-220.2
NCDENR-1 C6500000
5/13/2004 16:00
0.1 m
Copper
Total
3.1 ug/l
USEPA
-220.2
NCDENR-1 C6606000
81181200414:30
0.1 m
Copper
Total
14 ug/l
USEPA
-220.2
NCDENR-I C6500000
11/15/2004 12:00
0.1 m
Copper
Total
3.7 ug/l
USEPA
-200.8(W)
NCDENR-1 C6500000
2/9/2005 14:15
0.1 m
Copper
Total
*Non=detect
USEPA
-200.8(W)
NCDENR-1 C6500000
5/23/2005 11:16
0.1 m
Copper
Total
*Non -detect
USEPA
-200.8(W)
NCDENR-1 C6500000
8/10/2005 15:40
0.1 m
Copper
Total
4 ug/I
USEPA
-200.8(W)
NCDENR-I C6500000
11/15/2005 14:40
0.1 m
Copper
Total
*Non -detect
USEPA
-200.8(W)
NCDENR-1 C7000000
9/241200214:00
0.1 m
Copper
Total
13 ug/l
USEPA
-226.2
NCDENR-1 C7000000
3/251200312:00
0.1 m
Copper
Total
9.5 ug/I
USEPA
-220.2
NCDENR-1 C7000000
61261200315:30
0.1 m
Copper
Total
9.4 ug/t
USEPA
-220.2
NCDENR-1 C7000000
9129/200311:00
0.1; m
Copper
Total
8.7 ug/l
USEPA
-220.2
NCDENR-1 C7000000
1219/200314:00
0.1 m
Copper
Total
8.3 ug/l
USEPA
-220.2
NCDENR-I C7000000
3/11/2004 10:47
0.1 m
Copper
Total
5.3 ug/I
USEPA
-220.2
NCDENR-1 C7000000
6129/200414:45
0.1 -m
Copper
Total
7.8 ug/l
USEPA
-220.2
NCDENR-1 C7000000
91301200412:00
. 0.1 m
Copper
Total
7.9 ug/l
USEPA
-220.2
NCDENR-1 C7000000
121812004-12:16
0.1 m
Copper
Total
7.6 ug/l
USEPA
-200.8(W)
NCDENR-1 C7000000
3/30/2005 14:00
0.1 m
Copper
Total
6.7 ug/I
USEPA
-200.8(W)
NCDENR-I.C7000000
61221200611:00
. 0.1 m
Copper
Total
8.9 ug/l
USEPA
-200.8(W)
NCDENR-1 C7000000
91261200612:15
0.1 m
Copper
Total
7.3 ug/l
USEPA
-200.8(W)
NCDENR-I C7000000
12/28/2005 13:40
0.1 m
Copper
Total
4.7 ug/I
USEPA
-200.8(W)
C6500000 SF Catawba R at NC7 at McAdenville
C7000000 SF Catawba R near Belmont
te: Fw: a conf call on mon or Um
Subject: Re: Fw: a conf call on mon or tues
From: "Melinda Vickers" <VICKERMG@dhec.sc.gov>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 07:42:17 -0400
To: <Hyatt.Marshali@epamail.epa gov>, <jackie.nowell@ncmail.net>
Sorry, I was out yesterday. I have a meeting this morning (Tues) from 9-10.
Any time this afternoon work? I am open all day tomorrow (wed).
Here is a basic summary of what I need to see so Jackie can be thinking about it:
I was looking for the DMR data (basically the highest sample ever recorded) so I could
check into reasonable potential for chromium and sulfide. We have water quality
standards for both of these parameters that I wanted to compare to the guidelines
values to determine if the WQ limits are more stringent and to see if reasonable
potential exists. It appears that our sulfide WQ limits would be slightly more
restrictive than the guidelines.
Also, the limits derived for guidelines are much higher than the previous permit
limits. No justification was given for backsliding or any info on an antidegradation
review being performed to allow an increase in the limits.
See the attached spreadsheet for a summary of the values that I am using to make these
comparisons.
II
<Hyatt.Marshall@epamail.epa.gov>
7/21/06 2:44 PM >>>
which time of Jackie's
is good
for
you,
if any?
----- Forwarded by Marshall Hyatt/R4/USEPA/US on 07/21/2006 02:43 PM
Jackie Nowell
<jackie.nowell@n
cmail.net>
Marshall Hyatt/R4/USEPA/US@EPA
07/21/2006 02:42
PM
To
cc
Subject
Re: a conf call on mon or tues
Hyatt.Marshall@epamail.epa.gov wrote:
mon afternoon is bad for me. any other time mon or tues is good. let
me know when you are/aren't free.
Monday 10:15 - 12 noon or Tuesday 9 - 9:30 am
I of 2 7/25/2006 9:06 AM
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Pharr Yarns Outfall 001
NC0004812 Qw = 0.5 MGD
Time Period 2003-2004
Qw (MGD) 0.5
WWTP Class
III
7010S (cfs) 125
IWC (%) @ 7Q10S
0.6162
7Q10W(cfs) 228
@ 7Q10W
0.3388
30Q2 (cfs) 310
@ 3002
0.2494
Avg, Stream Flow, QA WS) 808
@ QA
0.0958
Racking Stream South Forks Catawba River
Stream Class
WS-V
STANDARD 8
PARAMETER
TYPE
CRRERIA (2)
POL
Units
REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS
RECOMMENDED ACTION
NCwnS/ %FAVf
n #Der. 1Yr FNd C1 AIn'tlk Cr
(1)
Crean[ Aox*
Aade: WA
SutSdes
NC
2
uglL
42 0
314.7
_—
__�5
_ -_______ _______-_-___
CIMa111G
Awh: 580
Chromium
NC
28 580
u91L
21 21
$5.8
________________._______
ChatYC 4,544
Acute: WA
Ph, -I,
A
1
uBIL
24 4
18.0
_
—
Chronic: 401--
Legend:
C = Cerdnogenlc
NC = Nor camnogenic
A = Aesthetic
"Freshwater Discharge
Phan yarn& rpa- 20D4srstds, rpa
7/25/2006
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Pharr Yarns Outfall 001
NC0004812 Qw = 1 MGD
Time Period 2003-2004
Qw (MGD) 1
WWrP Class III
7Qi0S (c/s) 125
IWC (%) 7Ql0S 1.2248
7QtoW(C/s) 228
g7Q1aW 0.6752
30Q2 (ds) 310
@ 30Q2 0.4975
Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cis) 808
@ QA 0.1915
RecNng Stream South Forks Catawba River
Stream Class WS-V
TANDARDS&
PARAMETER
TYPE
CRITERIA 12)
POL
Units
REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS
RECOMMENDED ACTION
Acrosl XFAVI
tbanc acute
n rM[ Ma PNd Cr A/orabb
(1)
Acute: WA
/1'ircl[. ._L.� Z�%� %/
Ih r �_C____________
Sutkdes
NC
2
uglL
42 0 3147 __
Chmnic: 163
v
•"---, / A.
/jtyc
Acute: 580
Chromium
NC
28 580
ug/L
21 21 85.3
---- --- ------------
Chmnic: 2,286
Acute: WA
PMnob
A
1 N
ug/L
24 4 18.0
----------------------------
Chronic: 201
Legend. "Freshwater Discharge
C = Ceninogenic
NC = Non-caminogenic
A = AesMeac
Phan yams rpa 2004scstds, rya
725/2006
Date Sulfide (lbs/day) Qw m d conc.(mcA) conc. u /I
Jul-05 <2.14
<2.14
<2.14
7/20/2005 0.05 0.25 0.024 mgA 24 ugA
Jun-05 <2.9
<2.9
<2.9
<2.9
<2.9
May-05 <2.1
<2.1
<2.1
<2.1
Apr-05
<1.9
<1.9
4/20/2005
1.92
0.137
1.680 mgA
1680 mg/I
4/27/2005
2.38
0.202
1.413 mgA
1413 mg/I
Mar-05
<1.35
3/9/2005
3.72
0.171
2.608 mgA
2608 ug/I
3/16/2005
3.32
0.332
1.199 mgA
1199 ug/I
3/23/2005
1.81
0.135
1.608 mgA
1608 ug/I
3/31 /2005
3.64
0.167
2.613 mgA
2613 ug/I
Feb-05
<1.1
<1.1
<1.1
<1.1
Jan-05
<2.19
<2.19
<2.19
<2.19
Date Sulfide (Ibs/day) Qw m d conc.(mciA) conc. WWI
May-06 <3.87
<3.87
<3.87
<3.87
<3.87
Apr-06
<3.72
<3.72
<3.72
<3.72
<3.72
Mar-06
<3.72
<3.72
<3.72
<3.72
<3.72
Feb-06
4.72
<3.72
<3.72
<3.72
Jan-06
<2.2
<2.2
<2.2
1/11/2006
1.52 0.192 0.949 mg/I 949 ug/I
1.52 0.192 0.949 949
January avg.
0.38 0.2 0.2278 mg/I 228 ug/I
Dec-05 <1
<1
<1
12/14/2005
3.4
0.228
1.788 mg/I
1788 ug/I
December avg.
0.85
0.18
0.566 mg/I
566 ugA
Nov-05
<1.7
<1.6
<1.7
<1.7
<1.7
Oct-05
<1.7
<1.7
<1.7
<1.7
<1.7
Sep-05
1.75
0.191
1.099 mgA
1099 ug/I
9/14/2005
2.99
0.276
1.299 mgA
1299 ug/I
<2.45
<2.45
Aug-05
<2.6
<2.6
<2.6
8/24/2005
4.6
0.262
2.105 mg/I
2105 ugA
/or'G� 4rZ¢ ,a , zog C4
a 3 N. I— .
L
w7�[d = 22% � �Z7� 63:f••� � = .6, 3,s'� c�3j�,rZ - w ?� �u yr�/� -
3oq 36'9
cis
Av
7- Alf-
-Al
TEXTILE EFFLUENT LIMITS SPREADSHEET
PERMIT NO:
PERMITTEE:
COUNTY:
PERMITTED FLOW:
NC0004812
PHARR YARNS, INC.
GASTON
1 MGD
BASED ON 40CFR410.70 SUBPART G
STOCK AND YARN FINISHING SUBCATEGORY
PRODUCTION DATA (in Ibs/day):
DAILY MAX. 24000 according to EPA recommendation
MONTHLY AVG. 24000
FROM 40CFR 410.70 SUBPART G (all limits in Ibs/1000 Ibs)
k ERAQFj,
6.8
3.4
84.6
42.3
17.4
8.7
7COD
0.24
0.12
0.12
0.06
0.120.06
st be between 6 and 9 at all times
LIMITS
163.2 8
2030.4 101
417.6 20
e 5.8
)I 2.9
Chromium 2.9
must be between 6 and 9 at all times
FOR PHARR YARNS, ONLY 27% OF FLOW IS
PROCESS FLOW ADJUST LIMITS ACCORDINGLY:
FINAL LIMITS
44.1
22.0
548.2
274.1
112.8
56.4
5.81
2.9
2.9
1.4
2.9
1.4
must be between 6 and 9 at all times
DOMESTIC WASTE IS 73%,
ADD ALLOCATION FOR THAT
POLLUTANT DAILY MAX. MON
BOD5 274.0 182.6
TSS 1 274.0 182.6
CODS 602.7318 401.8212
318.0 204.7 ' original SOD limits were 390 Ib/day (monthly ave)
1150.9 675.9 and 780 lb/day (daily max), so these limits are still
386.7 (b�dp 239.0 protective of DO
e 5.81 1.3 2.9
A I 2.9 1.4
Chromium 2.9 1.4
must be between 6 and 9 at all times
Re: Fw: NC0004812 Pharr Yarns effluent pages
Subject: Re: Fw: NC0004812 Pharr Yarns effluent pages
From: "Melinda Vickers" <VICYERMG@dhec.sc.gov>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 07:36:25 -0400
To:<Hyatt.Marshall@epamail.epa.gov>
CC: "Jeff DeBessonet" <DEBESSJP@dhec.sc.gov>, <jackie.nowell@ncmail.net>
Back on June 16, I had asked Jackie Nowell for some DMR data so I could evaluate
sulfide,'chromium and phenols (I copied you on that email). It appeared from the
fact sheet that the SC WQ standards for these parameters were not considered (or if
they were, there was no indication of such) and I wanted to see whether RP exists or
not and what the derived WQ limits would be in comparison to the categorical limits.
It appeared that only the categorical guidelines were limited. I never got a reply
to my request from NC.
Maybe this is something you have evaluated in your review, but there was nothing in
what I was given to indicate such. I hope the permit has not moved forward. If it
has been issued, I would like to see the final version of the -permit and know the
appeal period for the permit. SC would be concerned if there were not limits
protective of water quality in the permit.
Melinda
II (<Hyatt.Marshall@epamail.epa.gov> 7/13/06 3:03 PM >>> 'I
----- Forwarded by Marshall Hyatt/R4/USEPA/US on 07/13/2006 '03:03 PM
Jackie Nowell
<jackie.nowell@n
cmail.net>
Marshall Hyatt/R4/USEPA/US@EPA
07/13/2006 01:30
PM
Re: NC0004812 Pharr Yarns
effluent pages
Hyatt.Marshall@epamail.epa.gov wrote:
To
CC
Subject
I asked SC in an email last week what they thought of your rationale
for
the lack of RP. I haven't heard from them.
Hello Marshall,
We did not receive another request for DMR data from SCDHEC (Susan
asked you to mediate that request in a 6/16 email.) If you have not
gotten a response from them on your email, I am going to move forward
with finalizing the Pharr Yarns permit mod since you all have signed off
on it. Unless you advise otherwise.
1 of 2 7/17/2006 9:09 AM
Re: NC0004812 Pharr Yarns effluent pages
have a water quality standard for sulfide, so the effluent guideline
limit that is given should be protective of the stream. The allowable
concentrations for phenols and chromium from the NC standards are less
stringent that the effluent guideline limits that are given. The limits
assigned in the permits from 1977 through 1996 were less stringent than
the limits that will be assigned in this modification.
1996 limits
2006 limits
Mon. Avg. Da. Max.
Mon. Avg. Da. Max.
sulfide 4.6 lbs/day 11.8 lbs/day
2.9 lbs/day 5.8 lbs/day
Phenols 2.9 lbs/day 5.9 lbs/day
1.4 lbs/day 2.9 lbs/day
Total Chromium 2.9 lbs/day 5.9 lbs/day 1.4
lbs/day 2.9 lbs/day
An antidegradation statement can be added to the factsheet that states
that The Division of Water Quality has determined that the increased
limits will not result in contravention of applicable water quality
standards or loss of the river's designated uses. An alternatives
analysis was not performed because there was no increase in wasteflow or
change in the effluent characteristics from the facility.
Due to the stringency of the limits, the instream waste concentration of
0.6 % under 7Q10 conditions and the discharge point 8.5 miles above the
mouth of the South Fork Catawba River before its confluence into the
Catawba River, DWQ does not believe that the discharge of sulfide,
phenols or total chromium from Pharr Yarns will effect the water
quality in SC. The distance to the NC/SC state line and the amount of
stream flow makes it unlikely that the SC standards for these parameters
will be violated.
Please contact me if there are any additional questions.
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
X-GWTYPE:USER
FN:Melinda Vickers
TEL;WORK:(803) 898-4186
ORG:;EQC Water
TEL;PREF;FAX:(803) 898-4215
EMAIL;WORK;PREF;NGW:VICKERMG@dhec.sc.gov
N:Vickers;Melinda
END:VCARD
Susan A. Wilson, P.E.
Supervisor, Western NPDES Program
(919) 733 - 5083, ext. 510
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
2 of 2 7/5/2006 10:27 AM
f � [�11:I:I�fJBl3 if.Ti'F•TL9
Mike
II Jackie Nowell <jackie.nowell@ncmail.net> 6/2/2006 4:03 PM >>>
Michael, per the request in the April 27 letter from Mihir Mehta
regarding the subject facility. The permit modification is for the
revision of limits for sulfide, phenols, and total chromium based on
effluent guidelines for 40 CFR 410.70 Stock and Yarn Finishing Subcategory.
Attached is the draft cover letter, draft permit and factsheet for Pharr
Yarns. Pharr Yarns discharges into the South Fork Catawba River with a
7Q10 of 125 cfs and an average flow of 808 cfs. At 0.5 MGD, Pharr
Yarns has an instream waste concentration of 0.6 % . At the expansion
flow of 1 MGD, the instream waste concentration is 1.2 8. The distance
from the discharge point to the mouth of the South Fork Catawba River
where it enters the Catawba River is approximately 8.5 miles. North
Carolina has an action level standard for copper of 7 ug/l and the
allowable copper concentrations for Pharr Yarns at the end of pipe would
be 1136 ug/1 at 0.5 MGD and 572 ug/l at 1.0 MGD.
If the SC standard for copper of 2.9 ug/1 is applied, the allowable
concentration for copper at 0.5 MGD is 471 ug/l, and at 1.0 MGD, the
allowable concentration for copper is 237 ug/l. There was one value for
copper of 41 ug/l reported in the pollutant analysis done in Dec. 2004.
This data value is substantially less than the allowable concentrations
and would seem to indicate that copper is not a pollutant of concern for
Pharr Yarns. In addition, Pharr Yarns has consistently passed its whole
effluent toxicity test.
Regarding fecal coliform, the recommended and
the Pharr Yarns permit are 200/100ml (monthly
(daily maximum). Please contact me if there
regarding the modification of the Pharr Yarns
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
X-GWTYPE:USER
FN:Melinda Vickers
TEL;WORK:(803) 898-4186
ORG:;EQC Water
TEL;PREF;FAX:(803) 898-4215
EMAIL;WORK;PREF;NGW:VICKERMG@dhec.sc.gov
N:Vickers;Melinda
END:VCARD
existing limitations in
average) and 400/100ml
are any further questions
permit.
Fvd: NC0004812 Pharr Yarns permit.eml Content -Type: message/rfc822
4812-Fact Sheet- mod 2006.duc Content -Type: application/msword
Content -Encoding: base64
Content -Type: application/msword
4812 draftmod1tr042006.doc Content -Encoding: base64
2 of 3 7/13/2006 1:42 PM
Re: NC0004812 Pharr Yarns effluent pages
Subject: Re: NC0004812 Pharr Yarns effluent pages
From: Susan Wilson <susan.a.wilson@ncmail.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 09:56:27 -0400
To: Hyatt.Marshall@epamail.epa.gov
CC: jackie.nowell@ncmail.net
Marshall - I'll talk to Melinda is necessary - but this really smacks of a lack of trust (it's starting to hurt
our feelings) and we don't really think it's necessary to provide them with this. Jackie was correct - there
is such an amount of dilution prior to the state line - that it shouldn't be an issue anyway. The other
thing is - we screwed up the permit before and we need to get it corrected (and we've gone through all
the proper .procedure to do so).
So - could you mediate this one a bit?
thanks!
Melinda Vickers wrote:
Can you send me the DMR-data set that you are using for your permit decision on
Sulfide, phenols and chromium?
Melinda G. Vickers, Manager
Industrial Wastewater Permitting Section
Bureau of Water
SC Department of Health and Environmental Control
2600 Bull Street
Columbia, SC 29201
803-898-4186
803-898-4095 FAX
vickermg@dhec.sc.gov
Jackie Nowell <jackie.nowell@ncmail.net>. 6/13/06 12:00 PM >>>
Melinda,
Thank you for your comments on the Pharr Yarns draft permit. I
apologize about the deletion of the effluent pages, I forgot that the
permit consisted of two files. The effluent pages with the limits are
attached.
The limits for sulfide, phenols, and total chromium were revised by DWQ
after it was determined that the limits for these parameters were
incorrectly reduced during calculations from the effluent guidelines.
There was no increase in wasteflow from the facility or changes in
production to stimulate the limits revision. This is a correction of
our calculation and EPA has reviewed and approved the modification.
Pharr Yarns has been discharging into the South Fork Catawba River since
1977. The limits for sulfide, phenols, and total chromium have been
reevaluated at each renewal since that time. North Carolina does not
1 of 2 7/5/2006 10:27 AM
14C0004812 Pharr Yams effluent pages
Subject: NC0004812 Pharr Yarns effluent pages
From: Jackie Nowell <jackie.nowell@ncmail.net>
Date: Tue,13 Jun 200612:00:24 -0400
To: VICKERMG@dhec.sc.gov, Michael Montebello <MONTEBMJ@dhec.sc.gov>
CC: Susan A Wilson <Susan.A.Wilson@ncmail.net>, "Hyatt.Marshall@epamail.epa.gov"
<I4yatt.Marshall@epamail.epa.gov>
BCC: sergei chernikov <sergei.chernikov@ncmail.net>
Melinda,
Thank you for your comments.on the Pharr Yarns draft permit. I apologize about the
deletion of the effluent pages, I forgot that the permit consisted of two files. The
effluent pages with the limits are attached.
The limits for sulfide, phenols, and total chromium were revised by DWQ after it was
determined that the limits for these parameters were incorrectly reduced during
calculations from the effluent guidelines. There was no increase in wasteflow from
the facility or changes in production to stimulate the limits revision. This is a
correction of our calculation and EPA has reviewed and approved the modification.
Pharr Yarns has been discharging into the South Fork Catawba River since 1977. The
limits for sulfide, phenols, and total chromium have been reevaluated at each renewal -
since that time. North Carolina does not have a water quality standard for sulfide,
so the effluent guideline limit that is given should be protective of the stream. The
allowable concentrations for phenols and chromium from the NC standards are less
stringent that the effluent guideline limits that are given. The limits assigned in
the permits from 1977 through 1996 were less stringent than the limits that will be
assigned in this modification.
1996 limits 2006
limits Mon. Avg. Da. Max. Mon.
Avg. Da. Max.
Sulfide 4.6 lbs/day 11.8 lbs/day 2.9
lbs/day 5.8 lbs/day
Phenols 2.9 lbs/day 5.9 lbs/day 1.4
lbs/day 2.9 lbs/day
Total Chromium 2.9 lbs/day 5.9 lbs/day 1.4 lbs/day
2.9 lbs/day
An antidegradation statement can be added to the factsheet that states that The
Division of Water Quality has determined that the increased limits will not result in
contravention of applicable water quality standards or loss of the river's designated
uses. An alternatives analysis was not performed because there was no increase in
wasteflow or change in the effluent characteristics from the facility.
Due to the stringency of the limits, the instream waste concentration of 0.6 % under
7Q10 conditions and the discharge point 8.5 miles above the mouth of the South Fork
Catawba River before its confluence into the Catawba River, DWQ does not believe that
the discharge of sulfide, phenols or total chromium from Pharr Yarns will effect the
water quality in SC. The distance to the NC/SC state line and the amount of stream
flow makes it unlikely that the SC standards for these parameters will be violated.
Please contact me if there are any additional questions.
4812effluent-rev04072006.doc I
Content -Type: application/msword
Content -Encoding: base64
1 of 1 7/25/2006 9:04 AM
Addition to the Factsheet 6/13/2006
To address SCDHEC's concern about antidegradation, The Division of Water Quality has determined
that the increased limits will not result in contravention of applicable water quality standards or
loss of the river's designated uses. An alternatives analysis was not performed because there was
no increase in wasteflow or change in the effluent characteristics from the facility.
l�lA4 DATE: (3 6
Fact Sheet
NPDES NC0004812 Renewal
Page 3
DENR/DWQ
AMENDED FACT SHEET FOR NPDES PERMIT
NPDES No. NC0004812
Facility Information
Applicant/Facility Name:
Pharr Yarns, Inc.
Applicant Address:
100 Main Street, McAdenville, NC 28101
Facility Address:
147 Willow Drive, McAdenville, NC 28101
Permitted Flow
0.511.0 MGD
Type of Waste:
100% Industrial
Facility/Permit Status:
Class I/Active; Renewal
Count
Gaston Count
Miscellaneous
Receiving Stream:
South Fork
Catawba River
Regional Office:
MRO
Stream Classification:
WS-V
State Grid / USGSQuad:
F14SE/
303(d) Listed?
No
Permit Writer:
Jackie Nowell
Subbasin:
03-08-36
Date:
Aril 7, 2006
Drainage Area (im):
636
•
Lat. 350 15' 40" N Long. 8l ° 04' 39" W
Summer? 10 (cfs)
125
Winter 7Q10 (cfs):
228
30 2 (cfs)
310
Average Flow cfs):
808
IWC (%):
1.2
BASIS FOR PERMIT MODIFICATION
Pharr Yams has requested that the limits for sulfide, phenols, and total chromium that were assigned in
the January 21, 2005 permit be reevaluated. A review of the spreadsheet used in calculating limitations
based on plant production data and effluent guidelines from 40 CFR 410.70 Subpart G STOCK AND
YARN FINISHING SUBCATEGORY shows that limits were assigned based on only a percentage of plant
process flow. The correct effluent limits for sulfide, phenols and total chromium, while calculated on the
attached spreadsheet, were not assigned in the 2005 permit. This abbreviated fact sheet recommends a
modification in the limits for the three parameters. The previous permit writer had conferred with EPA
about the monthly average production value that should be used and it was decided that 24000 pounds
per day would be appropriate for calculation of daily maximum and monthly average limits. Pharr Yarns
is currently having compliance problems meeting the existing limits for sulfide, phenols, and total
chromium due to the stringency of those limits. This modification is to apply the appropriate limits as
calculated by effluent guidelines. The correct limits are listed below and all limits should be in lbs/day
POLLUTANT > DAILY MAX MONTHLY AVERAGE
Sulfide 5.8 2.9
Phenol 2.9 1.4
Total Chromium 2.9 1.4
EXISTING LIMITS TO BE MODIFIED
POLLUTANT
Sulfide
DAILY MAX MONTHLY AVERAGE
2.3 0.8
Phenol
1.2 0.
Total Chromium
1.2 0.4
No Sheet
NPDES NC0004912 Renewal
Page I
CHANGES TO THE PERMIT
■ Revised limits for sulfide, phenols and total chromium will be given based on monthly
average production value of 24000 lbs/day projected for 2005. This monthly average
production number was used to calculate both the monthly average and daily maximum
limits. There should be no adjustment for percentage of process flow. The revised limits
will be higher than those given in 2005 permit.
STATE CONTACT
If you have any questions on any of the above information or on the attached permit, please contact
Jackie Nowell at (919) 733-5038 ext. 512.
Aluel
NAM . DATE: c �'
REGIONAL OFFICE COMMENTS
NAME: DATE:
Fact Sheet
NFDF,S NCOW4812 Renewal
Paac'
NC0004812 Pharr Yams
Subject: NC0004812 Phan Yarns
From: "Melinda Vickers" <VICKERMG@dhec.sc.gov>
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 15:14:51 -0400
To: <jackie.nowell@ncmail.net>
CC: "JeffDeBessonet" <DEBESSJP@dhec.sc.gov>, "Michael Montebello"
<MONTEBMJ@dhec.sc.gov>, <Hyatt.Marshall@epamail.epa gov>
Mike Montebello forwarded me the permit modification that you e-mailed him to review
because I handle the industrial discharges in SC. I noticed that your public comment
period ended on May 19. I just received this today and hoped my comments could still
be considered.
The permit that is attached does not include the limitations you referenced in your
letter. There seems to be a discussion of NET, nutrients and color, but not the
guideline parameters that were all d increased loadings. Could you send the
appropriate permit or permit pagqW to me for review?
Based on the Fact Sheet, I do not see any record of an antibackslding or
antidegradation review having been performed to show the need to relax the limits.
This may have been done, but justification was not provided in the fact sheet. If
this review was done, how was it decided that the additional load could be allowed?
In SC, our Water Quality Standards regulation requires we evaluate alternatives to
discharge (such as can they operate the system more efficiently to achieve existing
limits, can part or all of the wastewater be land applied or sent to a POTW, etc)
before increased loading will be allowed. We might also only allow a portion of the
increase rather than the entire amount allowed by guidelines. This allows for
additional protection of water quality.
Also, none of the attached documents discusses the water quality criteria for chromium
and sulfide in SC standards. I doubt with the dilution that it would be an issue, but
I wanted to make sure these were considered.
Melinda G. Vickers, Manager
Industrial Wastewater Permitting Section
Bureau of Water
SC Department of Health and Environmental Control
2600 Bull Street
Columbia, SC 29201
803-898-4186
803-898-4095 FAX
vickermg@dhec.sc.gov
Subject: Fwd: NC0004812 Phan Yarns permit
From: "Michael Montebello' <MONTEBMJ@dhec.sc.gov>
Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 10:44:03 -0400
To: "Melinda Vickers" <VICKERMG@dhec.sc.gov>
CC: "JeffDeBessonet" <DEBESSJP@dhec.sc.gov>
Melinda,
This is the NC permit I indicated needed a review for NCDEM. I always copy Marshall on
my comments.
Thanks
Mike
1 of 3 6/6/2006 5:15 PM
NC0004812 Pharr Yarns permit
Subject: NC0004812 Pharr Yarns permit
From: Jackie Nowell <jackie.nowell@ncmail.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2006 1.6:03:00 -0400
To: Michael Montebello <MONTEBMJ@dhec.sc.gov>, giffinma@dhec.sc.gov
Michael, per the request in the April 27 letter from Mihir Mehta regarding the subject
facility. The permit modification is for the revision of limits for sulfide, phenols,
and total chromium based on effluent guidelines for 40 CFR 410.70 Stock and Yarn
Finishing Subcategory.
Attached is the draft cover letter, draft permit and factsheet for Pharr Yarns. Pharr
Yarns discharges into the South Fork Catawba River with a 7Q10 of 125 cfs and an
average flow of 808 cfs. At 0.5 MGD, Pharr Yarns has an instream waste concentration
of 0.6 % . At the expansion flow of 1 MGD, the instream waste concentration is 1.2
%. The distance from the discharge point to the mouth of the South Fork Catawba River
where it enters the Catawba River is approximately 8.5 miles. North Carolina has an
action level standard for copper of 7 ug/1 and the allowable copper concentrations for
Pharr Yarns at the end of pipe would be 1136 ug/1 at 0.5 MGD and 572 ug/1 at 1.0 MGD.
If the SC standard for copper of 2.9 ug/1 is applied, the allowable concentration for
copper at 0.5 MGD is 471 ug/l, and at 1.0 MGD, the allowable concentration for copper
is 237 ug/l. There was one value for copper of 41 ug/l reported in the pollutant
analysis done in Dec. 2004. This data value is substantially less than the allowable
concentrations and would seem to indicate that copper is not a pollutant of concern
for Pharr Yarns. In addition, Pharr Yarns has consistently passed its whole effluent
toxicity test.
Regarding fecal coliform, the recommended and existing limitations in the Pharr Yarns
permit are 200/100ml (monthly average) and 400/100ml (daily maximum). Please contact
me if there are any further questions regarding the modification of the Pharr Yarns
permit.
,4812-Fact Sheet-mod2006.doc i
Content -Type: application/msword
i =
Content -Encoding: base64 '
Content -Type: application/msword
4812 draftmodltr042006.doc Content -Encoding: base64
Content -Type: application/msword
14812 mod-permit-2006.doc '
Content -Encoding: base64
1 of 1 6/6/2006 9:58 AM
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Pharr Yarns
NC0004812
Time Period 12/8/2004
Qw (MGD) 0.5
WWTP Class III
7Q10S (cls) 125
/WC (%) ®7Q10S 0.6162
701OW(cls) 228
® 701OW 0.3388
3002 (cis) 310
@ 3002 0.2494
Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cis) 808
@ QA 0.0958
Rec'ving Stream South Forks Catawba River
Stream Class WS-V
Outfall 1
Ow = 0.5 MGD
STANDARDS &
PARAMETER
TYPE
CRITERIA (2)
POL
Units
REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS
RECOMMENDED ACTION
(1)
NCWQS/ iS FAV/
n iDet Mer Pied LW Allowable Cw
'
chronic Acute
•
Acute: WA
Arsenic
C
50
ug/L
1 0 WA
fir 3 ;'' '� _ �'•'•
Note: n<12
...... _
Chronic: 52,179
'
Limited data set
Acute: WA
Beryllium
C
6.5
uglL
1 0 WA
w
Note: n<12
_
Chronic: 6,783:
- ,-
'�
Limited data set
Acute: 15
Cadmium
NC
2 15
uglL
1 0 WA
-
Note: n<12
Chronic: 325
r
Limited data set
. s �,,; < .`' I-.,,
Acute: 1,02.2.
Chromium
NC
50 1,022
uglL
1 1 WA
Note: n<12
Chronic: 8,115
Limited data set
, n-aw'_�. ,,.
Acute: 7
Copper
NC
2.9 AL 7.3
ug/L
1 1 WA
x_r�, , , g s
Note: n<12
_ _ _ _
Chronic: 471
_ _
Limited data set
I
Acute: 22
Cyanide
NC
5 N 22
10
ug/L
1 0 WA
_
Note: n<12
_ _
Chronic: 811
Limited data set
+`s
Acute: WA
Fluoride
NC
1,800
u L:
0 0
WA
y
...... _
Chronic: 292123
-------
XY` x x •,. „
'
Acute: 34
Lead
NC
25 N 33.8
ug/L
1 0
WA
Note: n<12
,.
_ _ _
Chronic: 4 057
+ '�
•
Limited data
set
'
Acute: WA
x' ;,N,, t
Mercury
NC
12
ng/L
1 0 WA'
Note: n<12
Chronic: 1,947
Limited data set-
•
Acute: N/A
Molybdenum
A
3,500
ug/L
1 1 WA
,
1s ...a' s :'� .. z
�..
Note: n<12
_ _ _ _
Chronic: 1,403.500
Limited data set
Acute: 261
Nickel
NC
88 261
ug/L
1 0
WA
hE g
r� ?_-
Nate: n<12
_ _ _ _ __
Chronic: 14,282
''
'
Limited data
set
'?
Acute: WA
_I
Phenols
A
1 N
ug/L
0 0
WA
Chronic:
Acute: 56
`' x
Selenium
NC
5.0 56
ug/L
1 0 WA
,4 ,, „„ ;
Note: n<12
_ _ _
Chronic: 611
�- c
Limited data set
Acute: 1
-
Silver
NC
0.06 AL 1.23
ug/L
1 0 WA
Note: n<12
.............
Chronic: 10
_ _
Limited data set
Acute: 67
Zinc
NC
50 AL 67
ug/L
1 1 WA
'"�
Note: n<12
_ _ __
Chr0nlc: 8 115
_ _ _
, -
Limited data set
a
Legend: " Freshwater Discharge
C = Carcinogenic
NC = Non -carcinogenic
A= Aesthetic
npdesrpa 2004031,rpa
5/22/2006
NGIle
<
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Pharr Yarns Outfall 1
NCO004812 Ow = 0.5 MW
Time Pel 12/8/2004
Qw S OD)(da) 0.5 %)0 70M4s III Ale-
/ �j />n J7L /
]OfOS (ds) 125 IWC (%)O7OfOS 0.6162 /(/L "/�J T0`'O p1..
]O002 (ds) 310 O 7 3 0W 0.3388
2494 ]f
3002 (ds) 310 03002 0.2494 /w,"•'�'
Avg. Stream Flow, CA (de) 808 O CA 0.0958
RecViing Stream South Forks Catawba River Stream Class all /
STANDARDS A
PARAMETER
TYPE
CRRERIA(2)
POL
Units
REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS
RECOMMENDED ACTION
(1)
fficli NFAV1
IAL YURM LY AbeMYGr
Done Acaa
All WA
Arsenic
C
50
rol
1 0 WA
Note: ll
Chronic: W.179_--
Limited Bats M
Mute: WA
Beryllium
C
(is
ugVL
1 0 WA
_
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Note: n< 22
Chronic: B,T83
Limited dale M
Acute: 15
Cadmium
NC
2 15
u04
1 0 WA
Note: n<12
_
Chiral --925 —
Limited data am
Addle; irm
Chromium
NC
50 1,022
Ug'L
1 1 WA
Note: n<t2
Chronic: 8,115
Limited MY M
Acute: ]
Copper
NC
T AL 7.3
ul
1 1 WA
Note: n<12
__
CNronk: 1, 138
Limited tleY M
Acute: 22
Cyanide
NC
5 N 22
10
ugh
1 0
WA
Note: n<12
_ __ _
Ellronk: 811
Limited Bats
M
Acute: WA
Fluoride
NC
1 eau
uq4
0 0
WA
Chronic: 29&123
Acute: 34
Lead
NC
25 N 33.8
a 'L
1 0 WA
Note: n<12
Chmi 4,057
Llmkad dsts ad
Acids: WA
Mercury
NC
12
uVL
1 0 WA
Note: n42
Chronic: 1,84]
Limited dsM M
Acute: WA
Molybdenum
A
3,500
u,L
1 1 WA
Neal n<12
Chronic: 1,403.500
Limited date M
Ache: 281
Nickel
NC
88 261
u,L
I 0
WA
Note: n<12
Chrank: 14,282
Limited dsts
M
Adults: WA
Phenols
A
1 N
uryL
0 0
WA
Chronic: 401
Acute: W
Selenium
NC
5.0 56
ul
1 a WA
Note: n<12
Chronic: 811
Limited Nts M
Al 1
Silver
NC
ON AL 1.23
ug4
1 0 WA
Note: n<l2
_ _
CMOMc:.—.1U —
—'_._._._._._._______._._____
Limited dots M
Mute: 6]
Zinc
NC
_ i AL 67
ul
I 1 WA
Note: n<12
_
Chronic: 8
Limited dsla M
Legend: '• Freshwater Discharge
C=Canametienk
A Aesthetic genic
A=Aesmelk
nodes ma 2004031, ma
5TV2006
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Pharr Yarns
Outfall 1
NC0004812
Qw =1 MGD
Time Period 12/8/2004
Qw (MGD) 1
WWTP Class III
7010S (cis) 125
IWC (%) ® 7010S 1.2248
7Q10W (cis) 228
® 7Q10W 0.6752
3002 (cfs) 310
® 30Q2 0.4975
Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cfs) 808
® QA 0.1915
Rec'ving Stream South Forks Catawba River
Stream Class WS-V
STANDARDS &
PARAMETER
TYPE
CRITERIA
(2)
POL
Units
REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS
RECOMMENDED ACTION
(t)
Nhrank
1AcuteFAV
n I&L Mal Pmd Cw
Allowable Cw
Cbronfe
Acute
Acute:
WA
Arsenic
C
50
ug/L
1 0
WA
Note: n<12
Chronic:
26,115
-------------
s
Limited data set
Acute:
WA
Beryllium
C
6.5
ug/L
1 0
WA
Note: n<12
Chronic:
3,395
Limited data set
`.✓ '>
Acute:
15
Cadmium
NC
2
15
ug/L
1 0
WA
Nate: n<12
Chronic:
163
Limited data set"
_
Acute:
1,022
`
Chromium
NC
50
1,022
ug/L
1 1
WA
......
_ _ _
_ _ ----
Note: n<12
Chronic:
4,082
-
Limited data set
a
Acute:
7
Copper
NC
7
AL
7.3
ug/L
1 1
WA
Note: n<12
Chronic:
572
Limited data set
Acute:
22
Cyanide
NC
5
N
22
10
ug/L
1 0
N/A
Note: n<72
Chronic:
408
•
Limited data set
"�
_ '' " -
Acute:
WA
Fluoride
NC
1,800
ug/L
0 0
WA
_ _
Chronic:
_ _ __
146,961
_ __
Acute:
34
Lead
NC
25
N
33.8
ug/L
1 0
WA
Note: n<12
Chronic:
_ _ _
2,041
_ -------------------------
Limited data set=i
Acute:
WA
Mercury
NC
12
ng/L
1 0
WA
Note: n<12
Chronic:
__ _ __
980
Limited data set
- -
-"-
Acute:
WA
'•�
Molybdenum
A
3,500
ug/L
1 1
WA
Note: n<12
Chronic:
703,500
'..
_ _
Limited data set
Acute:
261
Nickel
NC
88
261
ug/L
1 0
WA
Note: n<12
Chronic:
7,165
Limited data set
Acute:
WA
,
Phenols
A
1
N
ug/L
0 0
WA
�'
_ _
Chronic:
_ _ _
201
c
Acute:
56
Selenium
NC
5.0
56
ug/L
1 0
N/A
_ _
__ _ _
_
Note: n<12
Chronic:
408
-
Limited data set
Acute:
1
Silver
NC
0.06
AL
1.23
ug/L
1 0
WA
Note: n<12
Chronic:
5.
?
Limited data set
Acute:
67
°
Zinc
NC
50
AL
67
ug/L
1 1
WA
Note: n<12
Chronic:
__ _____
_ _
Limited data set
-
Legend: •• Freshwater Discharge
C = Carcinogenic
NC = Non -carcinogenic
A = Aesthetic
npdes rpa 2004031, rpa
5/22/2006
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Pharr Yarns
Outfall 1
NC0004812
aW = 0.5 MGD
Time Period 12)8n004
Qw (MOO) 0.5
7010s lots) 125
WWTP ass III
/WC (%)0%)O7070f0,S 0.6162
��
7 30ap (cfs) 310
3001 (ds) 310
0 70/0 t 0.3388
O 3002 0.2494
Avg. Stratum Flow, OA (Cls) 808
O OA 0.0958
RwV#)g Stream South Forks Catawba River
Stream Class WS-V
STANDARDS e
PARAMETER
TYPE
CRITERIA 2
POL
Units
REASONABLE POTENTbL RESULTS
RECOMMENDED ACTION
NNFAV/
'Del IIVRd Qr A4a�Ne CN
III
mnk
Cmadr A[eN
Mule: WA
Arsenic
C
50
ug/L
1 0 WA
Nob: n<12
hunk:_
C521T9
—.-----.—.—.—.—.—.---.—.—.—.—_
Limited Wb M
Mule: WA
Beryllium
C
6.5
uyL
t 0 WA
Note: n<12
Chronic:_ B,T83
— — — --- — — — — — --- — _---
Llmlted deb M
Mule: 15
Cadmium
NC
15
ug/L
1 0 WA
Note: ll
Chronic:.-325—
Limited deb set
Mule: I'm
Chromium
NC
50 1,022
ug/L
1 1 WA
Note: n<12
_
Chronic: 8.116
--_---------------------------
Limited Mb M
Mute: 7
Copper
NO
Tfl AL 7.3
ul
1 1 WA
Now: n<12
Chunk: 471—
_._.—.—._.—.—._.—.—.—._.—.—.—
Llmited dab M
MUb: 22
Cyanide
NC
5 N n
10
ug/L
1 0
WA
Note: n<12
Chronic: 611—
-----------------------
umaM deb
M
AMe: WA
Fluoride
NC
1.30a
ug/L
0 0
WA
Chronic: 292,123
Mute: 34
Lead
NC
25 N W.8
not.
1 0 WA
Nob: n02
_
Chronic: 4,087
umibd deb M
Mule: WA
Mercury
NC
12
ngL
1 0 WA
Nob: n<12
Chronic: 1,M7
Limited dMe M
MUM: WA
Molybdenum
A
3.500
ug/L
I 1 WA
Note: n<12
Limited deb M
Mule: 261
Nickel
NC
88 261
ug4
1 0
WA
Note: n<12
Limited deb
eel
rends: WA
Phenols
A
1 N
ugA.
0 0
WA
Cnronk:__—Z _
____._____._._______._._.___._
Mule: W
Selenium
NC
SO 66
uq4
1 0
WA
Nob: n<12
_
Cheek: Bit
Limited dab
M
Mute: i
Sliver
NC
0.06 AL 1.23
ugL
1 0
WA
Note: n<12
Chronic:---10—
Limited deb
M
Mute: 67
Zinc
NC
50 AL 67
1 1 WA
1
JuA
NMe: n<12
_
Chrmec: 8,115
------- _-------------------------
Limied deb M
Legerb: " FrerhnW 01whavpr
C=Carchwgenic
NC=Noncamarlogenk
A=Attainable
npdes ma 2004031, rpe
8/2P 2006
REASONABLE POTENTIAL ANALYSIS
Pharr Yarns
NC0004812
Time Period 12/8/2004
Qw (MGD) 1
WWTP Class III
701OS (cls) 125
IWC (%) @ 7Q10S 1.2248
7Q10W (c/s) 228
® 7Q10W 0.6752
30Q2 (c/s) 310
@ 3OQ2 0.4975
Avg. Stream Flow, QA (cls) 808
® QA 0.1915
Rec'ving Stream South Forks Catawba River
Stream Class WS-V
Outfall 1
Ow =1 MGD
STANDARDS &
PARAMETER
TYPE
CRITERIA (2)
POL
Units
REASONABLE POTENTIAL RESULTS
RECOMMENDED ACTION
No WQS1 %FAVr
n BDeL Mar Prod Llv Allowable Cw
(1)
chronic Acute
Acute: WA-
x'.
Arsenic
C
50
ug/L
1 0 WA
Note: n<12
Chronic: 26 115
x 7
Limited data set
P,'.,x .�a.. 3�.y
Acute: WA
Beryllium
C
6.5
ug/L,
1 0
WA
4��Yw
c.
Note: n<12
_ _ _
Chronic: 3,395
Limited data
set
„;";.,,„`'Tx..�.,.,$f
Acute: 15
Cadmium
NC
2 15
ug/L
1 0
WA
s �r y„"`�; F:. ,.. '`,� `; ? �
Note: n<12
_ _ _ _
Chronic: 163
Limited data
set
Acute: 1,022
�A
;Chromium
NC
50 1,022
ug/L
1 1
WA
_ F�.
Note: n<12
_ _ _
Chronic: 4 082
Limited data
set
Acute: 7
,rb,
Copper
NC
2.9 AL 7.3
ug/L
1 1
WA
Note: n<12
Chronic: 237
Limited data
set,.
°'-a „x<r.�`:> ,. a, '�`"
Acute: 22
a
Cyanide
NC
5 N 22
10
uglL
1 0
WA
'>
Note: n<12
_ _
Chronic: 408
Limited data
set
Acute: WA
Fluoride
NC
1,800
uglL
0 0
.WA
Chronic: 146961xr
"z y
"
Acute: 34
Lead
NC
25 N 33.8
ug/L
1 0 WA
-
Note: n<12
.....................
Chronic: 2,041
Limited data set
Acute: WA
s
Mercury
NC,
12
ng/L
1 0 WA
v
Note: n<12
Chronic: 980
Limited data setfi�
Acute: WA
°
Molybdenum
A
3,500
ug/L
1 1 WA
r
Note: n<12
Chronic: 703,500
Limited data set
Acute: 261
1,
Nickel
NC
88 261
ug/L
1 0
WA
` _1,
Note: n<12
Chronic: 7,185
'
Limited data
set
Acute: WA
Phenols
A
1 N
ug/L
0 0
WA
Chronic: 201�,
r x .: �i t
Acute: 58
Selenium
NC
5.0 56
ug/L
1 0 WA
Note: n<12
Chronic: 408
k -- 1.
Limited data set
FFk
Acute:
Silver
NC
0.06. AL 1.23
ugtL
1 0 WA
Note: n<12
Chronic: 5
7 s
Limited data set
z
Zinc
NC
50 AL 67
ug/L
1 1 WA
Acute: 67�
Note: n<12
Chronic: 4,082�'�
----------
Limited data set?'
-
Legend: " Freshwater Discharge
C = Carcinogenic
NC = Non -carcinogenic
A = Aesthetic
npdes rpa 2004031, rpa
5/22t2006
BOARD;
Elizabeth M. Hagood
Chairman
Edwin H. Cooper, III
Vice Chairman
L Michael Blackmon
Secretary
April 27, 2006
D H E C
I PAW
�a
NN
PROMOTE PROTECT PROSPER
C Ead Hinter, Commissioner
Promoting and protecting the bealth of the pub& and the environment.
Ms. Carolyn Bryant
NC Division of Water Quality
Environmental Management Commission/NPDES Unit
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1617
RE: Notification of Intent to Renew NPDES Wastewater Permits for Pharr Yarns
(NC0004812), dated April 13, 2006.
Dear Ms. Bryant:
BOARD:
Carl L Beazell
Steven G. xisner
Paul C Aughtry, III
Coleman F. Bucki o se, MD
We are submitting comments regarding the above proposed NPDES permit modification,
which would continue the discharge of treated wastewater into the South Fork Catawba River.
Proposed discharge volume information was not provided in the above notice.
According to DHEC's latest approved 303(d) water quality assessment (2004), Lake
Wylie is impaired by copper levels above the Mill Creek arm at the end of SC Road 557 (CW-
197). Also, the Catawba River is impaired by copper levels at SC Road 5 above Bowater (CW-
041). South Carolina's standard for copper is 2.9 ug/l.
In addition, Lake Wylie (CW-027 located in the Crowders Creek arm at SC Highways 49
and 274) and the Catawba River (CW-014 at US Highway 21) are impaired by fecal colifonn
bacteria. South Carolina's standards for fecal coliform in the Catawba River are "not to exceed a
geometric mean of 200/100ml based on five day consecutive samples during any 30 day period;
nor shall more than 10% of the total samples examined during any 30 day period exceed
400/100m1 "
Please ensure that any permit modifications will not contribute to violations of South
Carolina standards. Please send a copy of the draft permit modification and permit rationale to
Mike Montebello, South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC),
Bureau of Water, 2600 Bull St., Columbia, South Carolina 29201. Thank you for considering
these comments when reviewing, and modifying this permit. If you need more information,
please contact Mark Giffin at (803) 898-4203 or giffiiiina@dhec.sc.gov for assistance.
Sincerely,
/VO MdA
Mihir Mehta P.E.,, Manager
Watersheds and Planning Section
MM:MAG
cc: Mark Giffin
Rheta Geddings
Mike Montebello
Gina Fonzi, EPA
M AY - 9 2006
iI i
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL
2600 Bull Street • Columbia, SC 29201 • Phone: (803) 898-3432 • w .scdhecgov
TEXTILE EFFLUENT LIMITS SPREADSHEET
PERMIT NO: N00004812
PERMITTEE: PHARR YARNS, INC.
COUNTY: GASTON
PERMITTED FLOW: 0.5 MGD
BASED ON 40CFR410.70 SUBPART G
STOCK AND YARN FINISHING SUBCATEGORY
PRODUCTION DATA:
DAILY MAX.
24000
according to EPA recommendation
MONTHLY AVG.
24000
FROM 40CFR 410.70 SUBPART G
(all limits in IbS11000 Ibs)
6.8
84.6
17.4
e 0.24
)I 0.12
Chromium 0.12
LIMITS
POLLUTANT DAILY MAX
AVERAGE
�.13 lip 600
1/0
POD
1 •;MONTHLY
81.6
COD
S
B3B:4"
4
1015.2
208.89
/ AA ,A�
T
5. �
2.
2 21uoy'rJ� r
Sulfide
Phenol
9
1.4
pap ^J
Total Chromium
2.9
1.4
re �C
pH
mList be een betw6 and 9 at all tmes
F Y
"1't
FOR PHARR YARNS, ONL� 27% OF FLOW IS
DOMESTIC WASTE IS 73%, Gop is
PROCESS FLOW ADJUST L
tT$ ACCORDINGLY:
ADD ALLOCATION FOR THAT
POLLUTANT DAILY M
( _ HLY AVERAGE
POLLUTANT DAILY MAX MONTHLY AVERAG
BOOS 137.0 91. .�30Y f'31 K 0,S d,�3
BODS
4.
22.0
COD -_
548.2
274.1
TSS .0 91.3
5
112.
56.4
COD 301,3659 200..9'1/06
Sulfide
1.
0.8
1* 4
Phenol
0.
0.4
0.q
131-tF I(,t 7f.Tdf L,L
Chromiu
/otal
pH
m be between 6 and 9 at all times
1 v'd_ 1 r
AL LIMITS (lb/da
POLLUTANT AI
BOOS
MONTHLY AVERAGE
181.0 113.4 '
original BOD limits were 390 lb/day (monthly ave)
COD
849.
475.0 and 780 Ib/day (daily max), so these limits are still
TSS
2
147.7 protective of DO
Sulfide
2.3
0.8
Phenol
1.2
0.4
Total Chromium
H I
1.2
must be and gat all
0.4
1�3.za�o,27
7?Z
e
rl
A,16-0
7,
S z6 0 -z
c/3O
—CV,
c� lr y >
ri2 A
l
A671 `/ �
f 1 `f7,
CIV Liz 3- 8 ��lt 6 6
C>, 1, Z
Sc J-/),�
Fw
C'.N C- CC L--__--_
..c, _V7— /G
;
.� Al
2.4Ae l.S/4
op"
114
; ! jvlhh, 6095' /(/I / P/ flP/2,
f, 8 /! !+w
TEXTILE EFFLUENT LIMITS SPREADSHEET
PERMIT NO: NC0004812
PERMITTEE: PHARR YARNS, INC.
COUNTY: GASTON
PERMITTED FLOW: 0.5 MGD
BASED ON 40CFR410.70 SUBPART G
STOCK AND YARN FINISHING SUBCATEGORY
PRODUCTION DATA:
DAILY MAX.
24000
according to EPA recommendation
MONTHLY AVG.
24000
MUM 4Di l-K 41V./V W15FAKI U
tau emus In IDs/1WU IDS)
POLLUTANT
DAILY MAX
MONTHLY AVERAGE
BODS
6.8
3.4
COD
84.6
42.3
S
17.4
8.7
Sulfide
0.24
0.12
Phenol
0.12
0.06
Total Chromium
0.12
0.06
PH
must be between 6 and 9 at all times
LIMITS
POLLUTANT DAILY MAX MONTHLY AVM.
BOD5 163.2 81.6
COD 2030.4 1015.2
S 417.6 208.8
Sulfide 5.8 2.9
Phenol 2.9 1.4
Total Chromium 2.9 1.4
H must be bets 6 and 9 at all times
FOR PHARR YARNS, ONLY 27% OF FLOW IS
PROCESS FLOW ADJUST LIMITS ACCORDINGLY:
POLLUTANT
DAILY MAX MONTHLY AVERAGE
GODS
44.1
22.0
COD
548.2
274.1
SS
112.8
56.4
Sulfide
1.6
0.8
Phenol
0.8
0.4
Total Chromium
0.8
0.4
H
must be between 6 and 9 at all times
i 181.0
849.6
249.7
e 2.3
DI 1.2
Chromium 1.2
DOMESTIC WASTE IS 73%,
ADD ALLOCATION FOR THAT
MAX AVERAG
IPBOLCILUTANT
(DAILY
IMONTHLY
91
3I
COD
301.3659
200.9106
original BOD limits were 390 lb/day (monthly ave)
nd 780 lb/day (daily max), so these limits are still
rotective of DO
Location:
S Fork Catawba R at NC 7 at McAdenville
Station:
C6500000
Classification:
WS-V
Subbasin:
CTB36
Period:
9/16/1997
to
81132002
<or>
Num.
Eval.
Eval. Level
Percentiles
Parameter
N <R.L.
Level
N %
Min.
10
25
50 75
90
Max
Field
Dissolved Oxygen
59 0
<4
0 0.0
5.2
7.1
7.7
9.2 10.9
12.4
14.0
(DO; mg/L)
<5
0 0.0
Conductivity
59 na
53
95
159
195 250
298
430
Temperature ("C)
59 na
2
7
10
16 23
26
28
PH(s.u.)
59 na
<6
0 0.0
6.5
7.3
74
7.5 7.7
7.9
8.3
>9
0 0.0
Otter (m9IL)
Total Residue
32
0
>500
1
48
89
120
140
180
199
1500
TSS
44
2
>10
20
45.5
1
4
6
10
14
26
60
>20
6
13.6
Chloride
35
0
>250
0
0.0
5
9
15
20
30
37
54
Turbidity (NTU)
59
0
>50
3
5.1
5
6
8
10
14
28
800
>25
9
15.3
>10
26
"A
Nutrients (mg/L)
NH3 as N
56
3
0.01
0.03
0.06
0.10
0.14
0.26
0.56
TKN as N
54
0
0.20
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.54
0.71
1.10
NO2+NO3 as N
56
0
>10
0
0.0
0.42
0.66
0.77
0.94
1.10
1.30
1.90
Total Phosphorus
57
3
>0.05
66
98.2
0.04
0.10
0.13
0.18
0.23
0.28
1.70
Metals (pgfL)
Aluminum (AI)
44
0
110
245
365
585
930
1810
37000
Arsenic (As)
44
44
>50
0
0.0
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Cadmium (Cd)
44
44
>2
0
0.0
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Chromium (Cr)
44
43
>50
0
0.0
25
25
25
25
25
25
26
Copper (Cu)
44
8
>7
5
11.4
2
2
2
3
4
9
350
Iron (Fe)
44
0
>1000
25
56.8
460
670
785
1100
1300
1800
28000
Lead (Pb)
44
43
>25
1
2.3
10
10
10
10
10
10
35
Manganese (Mn)
44
0
>200
1
2.3
30
42
52
68
85
99
1000
Mercury (Hg)
44
44
>0.012
0
0.0
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
Nickel (Ni)
44
43
>25
0
0.0
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Zinc (Zn)
44
21
>50
2
4.5
10
10
10
11
17
40
120
Bacteria (H700 ml)
--
Fecalcol"dorm
56
N>200=8
N>400=4
%>400--7.1
Geometric
mean=63.1
Abbreviations: N = number of samples; Num. < R.L. = number < Reporting Level; < or > refers to "less than or greater than": TSS
= Total Suspended Solids; conductivity measured as pmhos/cm; na = not applicable.
Evaluation Levels (Eval. Level) are presented to facilitate review. Some levels refer to water quality standards; others may be
used for ecological or Action Level review.
NCDENR, Division of Water Quality
Basinwide Assessment Report - Catawba River Basin - June 2003
199
Catawba Cr at SR 2302 at NC -SC State
Location:
Line
Station:
C7400000
Classification:
C
Subbasin:
CTB37
Period:
9/11/1997
to
8128/2002
<or>
Num.
Eval.
EvaL Level
Percentiles
Parameter
N
< R.L.
Level
N
%
Min.
10
25
50
75
90
Max.
Field
Dissolved Oxygen
55
0
<4
0
0.0
4.2
6.7
8.0
9.2
10.2
11.1
13.6
(DO; mg1Q
<5
1
1.8
Conductivity
55
na
65
90
108
121
132
140
151
Temperature (°C)
55
na
8
10
15
22
28
31
34
pH (s.u.)
53
na
<6
0
0.0
6.8
7.0
7.3
7.6
8.7
8.9
9.2
>9
4
7.5
Other (mg1Q
Total Residue
9
0
65
74
86
91
96
100
100
TSS
42
1
>10
1
2.4
1
2
3
4
5
8
11
>20
0
0.0
Chloride
8
0
>230
0
0.0
7
8
9
11
12
14
15
Turbidity (NTU)
55
0
>50
0
0.0
2
3
4
5
7
10
21
>25
0
0.0
>10
5
9.1
Nutrients (mg/L)
NH, as N
43
14
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.05
0.09
0.12
0.43
TKN as N
43
1
0.10
0.20
0.20
0.30
0.40
0.49
0.70
NO2+NO3 as N
43
10
>10
0
0.0
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.16
0.28
0.35
0.58
Total Phosphorus
43
2
>0.05
13
30.2
0.01
0.03
0.03
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.10
Metals (pg/L)
Aluminum (AI)
42
0
54
120
143
260
388
459
1400
Arsenic (As)
42
42
>50
0
0.0
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Cadmium (Cd)
42
42
>2
0
0.0
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Chromium (Cr)
42
42
>50
0
0.0
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
Copper(Cu)
42
2
>7
8
19.0
2
2
4
5
6
10
13
Iron (Fe)
42
0
>1000
0
0.0
84
141
175
275
398
506
990
Lead (Pb)
42
42
>25
0
0.0
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Manganese (Mn)
11
0
15
23
26
36
43
52
91
Mercury (Hg)
42
42
>0.012
0
0.0
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
Nickel (Ni)
42
42
>88
0
0.0
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Zinc (Zn)
42
27
>50
2
4.8
10
10
10
10
15
22
69
Bacteria (#/100 ml)
---------------------
-------------
--
"-
Fecal coliform
52
N>200.0
N>400=0
%>400=0.0
Geometric mean=8.9
Abbreviations: N = number of samples; Num. < R.L. = number < Reporting Level; < or > refers to less than or greater than"; TSS
= Total Suspended Solids; conductivity measured as pmhoslan; na = not applicable.
Evaluation Levels (Eval. Level) are presented to facilitate review. Some levels refer to water quality standards; others may be
used for ecological or Action Level review.
NCDENR, Division of Water Quality
Basimrids Assessment Report - Catawba River Basin - June 2003
201
12-4y"1 'Arr p-6J(
PharrPolomar
Pharr Yarns, Inc.
• Pharr International, Inc
P.O. Box 1939
Sylvan Yarn Systems, Inc.
100 Main Street
McAdenville, K 28101-1939
Telephone:704/824-3551
Facsimile: 704/824-0072
February 15, 2006
Mr. Sergei Chemikov, Ph.D.
NPDES Unit
NC Division of Water Quality
1617 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, N.C. 27699
P AR
R Subject: NPDES Permit No. NC0004812
YARN 8 Pharr Yarns, Inc.
McAdenville WWTP
Dear Mr. Chernikov:
1ti' FE3 27 ZOO
You may be aware that Pharr Yarns has been experiencing considerable difficulty
maintaining compliance with the current permit effluent limitations for sulfides. This
permit, issued March 1, 2005, contains sulfide limits of 0.8 lb/day, monthly average, and
2.3 lb/day, daily maximum.
Based on our experience, we have found that, if we have any detectable sulfide
concentrations in our effluent, the resulting calculated mass loadings (lb/day) will exceed
the mass effluent limits. Therefore, we have been reviewing this matter on several fronts
to get a better understanding of how these limits were derived.
In the course of this review, we have come across some interesting information that our
consultant, Mr. J. Thurman Horne, P.E. (Horizon Engineering & Consulting, Inc.)
discussed with you by phone on February 14, 2006. It is my understanding that, after
discussing this matter with Mr. Home, you agreed that it appears that the effluent limits
for sulfide, phenol and total chromium, may have been assigned incorrectly in the permit
due to a flaw in the derivation of the limits, and that this matter should be reviewed.
The key to this problem appears to be in the "Textile Effluent Limits Spreadsheet" that
was included with the Fact Sheet when the draft permit was first developed and sent to us
by letter dated November 24, 2004 (copy attached.) As you and Mr. Home have
discussed, the error appears near the bottom of the first page of the spreadsheet, where
calculations are made to allow for the contribution of BODS, TSS and COD attributable
to the domestic portion of the wastewater flow. The calculations correctly adjust the
calculated BODS, TSS and COD limits that were derived from the federal guideline (40
CFR 410.70 Subpart G) to account for the contribution of these constituents from the
domestic portion of the wastewater.
The problem is that, in the course of making these calculations, it appears that a mistake
was made wherein the limits calculated based on the federal guidelines for sulfides,
phenol and total chromium, were reduced to 27 % of the allowable limit. Whereas
compliance with this limit is determined by multiplying the concentration of the effluent
times the total flow (combined process and domestic wastewater) to determine the mass
effluent concentration, Pharr Yarns is currently being unfairly deprived of the full
federally allowable mass limits for sulfides, phenol and total chromium.
Page 2
The limits for sulfides, phenol and ti
guidelines, should not have been reduced
Therefore, the correct limits for these con
Daily Max.
Sulfides 8.7
Phenol 4.3
Total chromium 4.3
Based on:
Maximum daily production = 36,200
Monthly average production =
Chernikov to Mike Church dated
Federal Guidelines:
Daily maximum
Sulfide 0.24lb/10001bs
Phenol 0,12 lb/1000 Is
Totalchromium 0.12 lb/1000 lbs
Just for information purposes and as a s
copy of the Fact Sheet from 1996 which
that time, were derived from the federal
described.
Pharr Yarns is hereby requesting that the
that the above limitp for sulfides, phenol
based on consideration of the above infori
We appreciate your assistance and con;
information is sufficient but, if you have
or if there are any matters you need to di
(704-823 -23 10) or Mr. J. Thurman Horne,
704-788-4455.)
Sincerely,
;6��� � � �
Mike Church
Pharr Yarns Environmental Engineer
Cc: Rex Gleason (P.E. (NC DWQ MRO)
Mike Parker (NC DWQ — MRO
J. Therman Home (P.E. Horizon
Frank Lampke (Space Dye Plant
chromium, as derived from the federal
should be the correct limits for our permit.
:nts should be:
Monthly Avg. (lb/day)
2.9
1.4
1.4
lb/day (Note: See attached email from Sergei
y 13, 2005)
Monthly Average
0.12 lb/10001bs
0.06 lb/10001bs
0.06 lb/10001bs
oint of reference, we have attached a
the former effluent limits assigned at
in the correct manner which we have
ent permit be amended or revised to reflect
total chromium are in effect. We trust that,
►n, you will act favorably on this request.
�ideration of this matter. We hope that this
any questions, need any additional information,
scuss, please do not hesitate to contact myself
P.E. (Horizon Engineering & Consulting, Inc.,
jng & Consulting, Inc.)
02/15/06
11:38
HORIZON ENGINEERING &
i
TING 4 PHARR YARNS TRAF NO.706 904
Page 1 of l
We Chu
From:
SeWl CherNkov <sergeLchemikovg
To:
Sent:
<rnike.church@rnhdspring.com>
Attach:
Thursday, January 13, 2005 US AM
4812-effluent 2005.doc
Subject:
new effluent limits
Mike,
iil.net>
I have received -your letter with request to consider potential increase
in production. Accordingto your letter, it is expected that production
will increase 30% in 2005 compared to 2004. Production in 2004 was
19,499 lb/day (monthly average). Therefore, 2005 production level will
be 25,348 lb/day. EPA was not willing to accept thi� number, after
lengthy negotiation I was able to achieve their consepsus at the 24,000
lb/day and recalculated permit limits. Attached is the file with the new
limits. please let me know if these numbers are acceptable. I also had
to change methodology for calculating Daily Max. Limits due to EPA
objections.
Sergei
0
k'iLl-u-- tt
1/13/05
02%15i06 11:38 HORIZON ENGINEERING & CONSULTING 4 PHARR YARNS TRRF
NU. '706
IJU
State of North Carolina
Department of Environment
and Natural Resources
Division of Water Quality
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross, Jr., Secretary
Alan W. Klimek, RE., Director
W. I IL- Church
Environmental Engineer
Pharr Yams
100 Main St.
McAdeuville, North Carolina 28101
Dear Mr. Church;
'+��:. ... �. � - .. '•ii ��9%4 as
1
GOV 2 4 200A
t004
NCDENR
ENVIRONMENT AND N R1.JRAL ResouRCE5
/Subject: Draft NPDES Permit
Permit NC0004812
Pharr Yarns WWrP
Gaston County
Enclosed with this letter is a copy of the draft permit for your f"ry. Please review the draft very carefully
to ensure thorough understanding of the conditions and requirements it contains.
The draft pemlit contains the following significant changes from your current permit:
• The daily maxinnun total residual chlorine (TRC) limit has been added to the permit. See the
attached total residual chlorine policy memo for details. The facility is allowed 18 months from the
effective date of the permit to comply with the total residual chlorine limit. This time period is
Loved in order for the facility to budget and design/construct the dechlorination and /or
alternative disinfection systems.
• Limits for BOD, ODD, TSS and sulfide were changed due to the changes in production volume.
Please submit any comments to me no later than thirty days following your receipt of the draft. Comments
should be sent to the address listed at the bottom of this page. If no adverse comments are received from
the
005.ublic or from you, this permit will hkely be issued in early January, with an effective date of Febnrvy 1,
If you have any questions or conumnts concerning this draft permit, contact me at the telephone number or
e-mail address listed at the bottom of the previous page.
CC: NPDES Files
Mooresville Regional Office / Water Quality Section
Pretreatment Unit
Aquatic ToxicologyUtut
Mr. Roosevelt Childress, EPA Region IV
DEH
NPDES Unit, 1617 Mail Service Center. Raleigh, North Carolina 27699
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Actlon Employer
S rely,
ergei Cherrtilwv, Ph.D.
NPDES Unit
919 733.5083, extension 594 (fax) 919733.0719
Sergei.chemikov® ncmail. net
0�2/1b/0b 11:38 HORIZON ENGINEERING 8 CONSULTING 4 PHARR YARNS TRAF
TEXTILE EFFLUENT LIMITS SPREADSHEET
PERMIT NO:
NCOOD4812
PERMITTEE:
PHARR YARNS, INC.
COUNTY:
GASTON
PERMITTED FLOW:
1 MGD
PRODUCTION DATA
in Ibs/day :
DAILY MAX.
36200
MONTHLY AVG.
19499
FROM 40CFR 410.70 SUBPART G (all limits In Ibs/1000 Ibs)
BOD5
6.8 3.4
COD
134.6 42.3
TSS
17.4 B.7
Sulfide
0.24 0.12
Phenol
0.12 0.06
Total Chromium
0.12 0.06
pH
must be between 6 and 9 at au dies
LIMITS
BUDS
246.2 66.3
COD
3062.5 824.8
TSS
629.9 169.6
Sulfide
8.7 2.3
Phenol
4.3 1.2
Total Chromium
4.3 1.2
pH
I must tie behmen 6 and 9 at all fines
FOR PHARR YARNS, ONLY 27% OF FLOW IS
lrcwcaa rl.Vry ADJUST LIMITS ACCORDINGLY
BODS
68.5 t 7.9
COD
826.9 222.7
SS
170.1 45.8
Sulfide
2.3 0.6
Phenol
1.2 0.3
Total Chromium
1.2 0.3
PH
must be between 6 and 9 at all bores
1430.7
444.0
a 2.3
01 1.2
Chromium 1.2
must be between 6 and 9 at ail
NO.706
BASED ON 40CFR410.70 SUBPART G
STOCK AND YARN FINISHING SUBCATEGUP
DOMESTIC WASTE I5 73%,
ADD ALLOCATION FOR THAI
BOD5
274.0
182.6
IT -SS
274.0
182.6
CODS
602.7318
401.8212
I
I
I
200.5 ' original BOO limits were 390 lb/day (monthly ave)
624.5 and 780 lb/clay (daily max), so these limits are still
228.4protective of DO
in8 L 9
��.5
02/15/06 11:38 HORIZON ENGINEERING &
r V
TEXTILE EFFLUENT LIMITS SPREADSHEET
PERMIT NO: NC0004812
PERMITTEE: PHARR YARNS, INC.
COUNTY: GASTON
PERMr TED FLOW: 015 MGD
PRODUCTION DATA:
40CFR 410.70 SUBPART G all limits In Ibs/1000
L
waw
5.8
COD
84.6
TSS
17.4
1
Sulfide
0.24
Phenol
0.12
Total Chromium
0,12
PH
must be between 6 and 9 at all tines
LIMITS
8.7
0.112
t�uu 3062.5 82:.8
TSS 629.9 16 .6
Sulfide 8.7 i2l
Phenol 4.3 1.2
Total Chromium 4.3 i.2
PH must be between 6 and 9 at all times
FOR PHARR YARNS, ONLY 27CVo OF FLOW IS
PROCESS FLOW ADJUST LIMITS ACCORDINGLY:
Phenol
Total Chromium
pH
FINAL LIMITS
I Chromium
tgblb 1
826.9 22
170,1 g
2,3
1.2
1.2
must be between 6 and 9 at all times
TING 4 PHARR YARNS TRAF NO.706 P07
i
BASED ON 40CFR410.70 SUBPART G
STOCK AND YARN FINISHING SUBCA'TEGC i
I
I
i
i
I
i
i
i
1
I
i
I
DOMESTIC WASTE IS 73%, {
ADD ALLOCATION FOR THAT
BODS 137.0 91.3 I
SS I 137.0 91.311!
COD 301,3659 � 200.9106
203.4
109.2
` original BOD limits were 390 lblday (monthly ave)
1128.2
421.6
and 780 lb/day (daily max), so these limits
307.1
13y.1
are still
protective of DO
2.3
9-6
1.2
0.3
1.2
+ 0.3
Y must be between 6 and 9 at all times
k-
NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION
PERMIT NO.: NC0004812
PERMITTEE NAME: Pharr Yarns, Inc.
FACILITY NAME: Pharr Yards Industrial WWTP
Facility Status: Existing
Pen -nit Status: Renewal
Major Minor
Pipe No.: 001
Design Capacity: 1.0 MGD
COT 4 mr.
Domestic (% of Flow):' 2 % UPIRQA OF
_Industrial (% of Flow): 98 %
Comments:
NOTE change in ggideline calculations. _
0o 51-t�D' �v2 j�u i w`o� BAT', i•(a-, B ESrJ
RECEIVING STREAM: the South Fork Catawba River
Class: WS-IU
Sub -Basin: 03-08-36
Reference USGS Quad: 1714SE (please attach]
County: Gaston
Regional Office: Mooresville Regional Office
Previous Exp. Date: 9/30/96 Treatment Plant Class: class In
Classification changes within three miles:
Requested by: /I R�))let Date: W-•
Prepared by: Date:
Reuie_we /�+r. f � Y ,'1•/ `��.�-�1_� _ Date:`
N
Modeler- Date Rec. # •
�n
SMIJ 5 3l lb �~C'cl i Q01
Drainage Area (mil } fG 3 tc Avg. Stream tlow (cfs): Jo
7Q l0 (cfs) /25 Winter 7Q10 (cfs)z 30Q2 (cfs) i ei
Toxicity Limits: IWC % Acutucfc? co
hisiream Monitoring:
Pararrtcters � Q , '.,a . °l'''
Upstream Location ,1,;.
Downstream y Location lb".4 7 �
Recommended Limits
Monthly Avg-
Daily Max.
WQ or EL
Flow (MGD):
1.0
BADS (lbs/day):
182
412
BAT
-T-SS—(lbslda-Y)--�-38_
9-3-2
DO (mgA):
monitof
monitor
PH (SU):
6-9
6-9
COD (tbs/day):
1607
4145
BAT
NH3-N (mg/1):
monitor
monitor
Totat Chromium
2.3
5.9
BAT
(lbs/day):
Phenols (lbs/day):
2.3
5.9
BAT
Sutfode (ibs/day):
4.6
11.8
BAT
Fecal Cohforrn
200
400
WQ
(/100mI)
Residual Chlorine
monitor
monitor
(pgA):
Temperature (C):
monitor
monitor
TN (m61):
monitor
monitor
TP (rrig/1):
monitor
monitor
Comments:
_
o
N
0
z
m
z
M
z
rn
rn
z.
RO
z
0 .
y
D
D
M
z
D
n
z
0
m
m