20190732 Ver 2_Modifications_20200114

Staff Review
Does this application have all the attachments needed to accept it into the review process?
r Yes r No
ID#*
20190732
Version* 2
Is this project a public transportation project?* r Yes
r No
Reviewer List:* Alan Johnson:eads\adjohnson1
Select Reviewing Office:* Mooresville Regional Office - [phone]
Submittal Type:*
401 Application
Does this project require a request for payment to be sent?*
r
Yes
r
No
How much is r $240.00
owed?* r $570.00

Project Submittal Form
Please note: fields marked with a red asterisk below are required. You will not be able to submit the form until all
mandatory questions are answered.
Project Type: r New Project
r Pre -Application Submittal
r More Information Response
r Other Agency Comments
r For the Record Only (Courtesy Copy)
r Stream or Buffer Appeal
New Project - Please check the new project type if you are trying to submit a new project that needs an official approval
decision.
Pre -Application Submittal - Please check the pre -application submittal if you just want feedback on your submittal and
do not have the expectation that your submittal will be considered a complete application requiring a formal decision.
More Information Response - Please check this type if you are responding to a request for information from staff and
you have and ID# and version for this response.
Other Agency Comments - Please check this if you are submitting comments on an existing project.
Project Contact Information
Name: Chris Tinklenberg
ftio is subrritting the information?
Email Address: [e-mail]
Project Information
Project Name: No Da Sugar Creek
Is this a public transportation project?
r Yes
r No
Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)?
r Yes r No r Unknown
County (ies)
Mecklenburg
Please upload all files that need to be submited.
aick the upload button or drag and drop files here to attach document
00_NoDa_404-401_Permit Mod (SAW-2018-01201;
8.58MB
DWR 19-0732).pdf
Only pdf or krm files are accepted.
Describe the attachments:

Good afternoon,
Please find the attached Pre -Construction Notification Modification request (NWP 14) for the above -
referenced project. Please let me know if you have any questions or need any additional information.
Thank you,
Chris
V By checking the box and signing box below, I certify that:
• I have given true, accurate, and complete information on this form;
• I agree that submission of this form is a "transaction" subject to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes (the
"Uniform Electronic Transactions Act")
• I agree to conduct this transaction by electronic means pursuant to Chapter 66, Article 40 of the NC General Statutes
(the "Uniform Electronic Transactions Act');
• I understand that an electronic signature has the same legal effect and can be enforced in the same way as a written
signature; AND
• I intend to electronically sign and submit the online form."
Signature:
Submittal Date: Is filled in auto ratically.

kimley-horn.com 200 South Tryon, Suite 200, Charlotte, NC 28202 704-333-5131

January 13, 2020

Mr. David Shaeffer
Asheville Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers
151 Patton Avenue, Room 208
Asheville, NC 28801-5006

Mr. Alan Johnson
Division of Water Resources – Water Quality Regional Operations
610 East Center Drive, Suite 301
Mooresville, NC 28115

Re: Pre-Construction Notification (NWP #14) Modification Request
NoDa Sugar Creek – Brand Properties, LLC
(SAW-2018-01201 & DWR# 19-0732)
Charlotte, Mecklenburg County, NC

Dear Mr. Shaeffer and Mr. Johnson:

On behalf of our client, Brand Properties, LLC, Kimley-Horn (KH) is requesting a modification to the
Nationwide Permit #14 and the General Water Quality Certification number 4135, both authorized
on July 25, 2019 for the above referenced project. The following revised information is included as
part of this permit modification request:

 Project Summary Sheet
 Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
 Figure 5 – Proposed Conditions (2019 Meck. Co. Aerial)
 Permit Plans – NoDa Sugar Creek Site
PROJECT BACKGROUND
Based on unanticipated geotechnical issues, the site plan for the proposed 16-acre multi-family
development has been modified, resulting in a reduction in overall impacts to aquatic resources.
Access into the site, still requires a single private driveway off Matheson Avenue and a bridge
crossing over Little Sugar Creek; however, the bridge location has been shifted west to allow for a
more perpendicular crossing over Little Sugar Creek and to minimize stream and wetland impacts.

PROPOSED IMPACTS TO JURISDICTIONAL WATERS
The proposed project seeks to install a 52 linear-foot, 60” reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) along
Stream B as part of the proposed bridge construction. The culvert will be installed no less than one
Page 2
kimley-horn.com 200 South Tryon, Suite 200, Charlotte, NC 28202 704-333-5131

foot below the bed of the stream to allow low flow passage of water and aquatic life. Rip-rap
dissipation is proposed at the inlet and outlet of the proposed pipe to reduce discharge velocity and
meet non-erosive design criteria. Both areas will be constructed using natural channel design
techniques that include ensuring that the rip-rap is properly installed into the channel bed and
placed in a fashion to ensure aquatic passage. The culvert installation and inlet/outlet protections
will result in 72 lf of permanent stream impacts to non-wetland waters of the US. Installation of the
culvert requires 40 lf of temporary stream impacts for the construction activities necessary to work
in dry conditions. Additionally, construction of the bridge consists of 0.09-ac of permanent impacts
to Wetland B. 0.04-ac of temporary wetland impacts are necessary to facilitate construction of the
retaining wall within Wetland B.

Construction activities on the southern portion of the property include 0.11-ac of permanent
wetland impacts to Wetland C from grading fill slopes necessary for construction of a pedestrian
footpath. 0.04-ac of temporary wetland impacts are necessary to Wetland C to construct the
retaining wall for the footpath.

In total, the proposed development project seeks permanent impacts to 72 lf of non-wetland
waters of the US and 0.2-ac of wetland-waters of the US. A total of 40 lf of temporary non-
wetland waters of the US impacts are needed for construction activities necessary to work in dry
conditions. 0.1-ac of temporary wetland impacts are necessary for construction of retaining walls.
All temporary impacts will be restored to preconstruction conditions following completion of the
activities.

COMPENSATORY MITIGATION
Compensatory mitigation will be met by the purchase of credits through the NC Division of
Mitigation Services (NCDMS) in-lieu fee program. 72 lf of stream impacts will be mitigated through
the purchase of stream mitigation credits. Based on an NCSAM assessment of intermittent Stream
B, mitigation is proposed at a 1.75:1 ratio. Since the project is located within the Lower Catawba
watershed (HUC 03050103), credits will be purchased at a 3.5:1 ratio; therefore, 252 SMUs will be
purchased from NCDMS for impacts associated with the new development. 0.2-ac of wetland
impacts will be mitigated through the purchase of wetland mitigation credits. Based on an NCWAM
assessment of Wetlands B and C, mitigation is proposed at a 1.5:1 ratio. Wetland mitigation credits
will be purchased at 3:1 based on the location of the project within the Lower Catawba watershed,
therefore, 0.6 wetland credits will be purchased from NCDMS for wetland impacts.

In total, 252 stream credits and 0.8 wetland credits will be purchased from NCDMS to provide the
appropriate compensatory mitigation for this project.

Page 3
kimley-horn.com 200 South Tryon, Suite 200, Charlotte, NC 28202 704-333-5131

Please feel free to contact me at [phone] if you have any questions or if additional
information is necessary.

Sincerely,

KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
Environmental Scientist

Attachments

Project Summary Sheet
kimley-horn.com 200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200, Charlotte, NC 28202 704-333-5131

Project Name: NoDa Sugar Creek

Applicant Name and Address: Brand Properties (POC: Dan Fitzpatrick)
3328 Peachtree Road NE, Suite 100
Atlanta, GA 30326
Telephone Number:770-822-2090
Type of Request: Nationwide PCN (NWP # 14) Individual Permit Application

Jurisdictional Determination Other:
Included Attachments: Project Plans USGS Map NRCS Soil Survey
Agent Authorization Delineation Sketch Delineation Survey
Data Forms (Up & Wet) NCDWR Stream Forms USACE Stream Forms
NCDMS Confirmation Aerial Photo Site Photos
Agency Correspondence Other: NCSAM Forms Other: NCWAM Forms
Check if applicable: CAMA County Trout County Isolated Waters
Section 7, ESA Section 106, NHPA EFH
Mitigation Proposed ( NC EEP On-Site Off-Site Other)
County: Mecklenburg Nearest City/Town: Charlotte
Waterway: Little Sugar Creek River Basin: Catawba
H.U.C.: 03050103 USGS Quad Name: Charlotte East
Property Size (acres): 16.02 acres Approx. Size of Jurisdiction on Site (acres): 1.7 ac
Site Coordinates (in decimal degrees): 35.247920 °N -80.812634 °W
Project Location: The site consists of an approximate 16-acre mixed use tract located at 255 Matheson Avenue, which is
situated between Matheson Avenue and Cullman Avenue, in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County.

Site Description: The project area is currently undeveloped forest land. Existing land use in the vicinity of the project
includes, industrial and commercial development, and undeveloped forested/maintained properties.

Impact Summary (if applicable): The proposed project seeks to install a 52 lf RCP resulting in 72 lf of permanent stream
impacts. The project requires 40lf of temporary stream impacts for the construction activities necessary to work in dry
conditions to install the culvert. Additionally, 0.2-ac of permanent wetland impacts will result from the construction of
retaining walls and site grading. 0.1-ac of temporary wetland impacts are necessary for construction of retaining walls.

NWP
#
Open Water
(acres)
Wetland
(acres)
Stream Channel
Intermittent and/or Unimportant
Aquatic Function
Perennial and/or Important
Aquatic Function
Temp. Perm. Temp. Perm. Temp. Perm. Temp. Perm.
lf ac lf ac lf ac lf Ac
14 0.1 0.2 40 0.005 72 0.04

Total 0.1 0.2 40 0.005 72 0.04
Total Permanent (Loss) Impact to Non-Wetland Waters of the U.S. 72 lf (0.04 ac)
Total Permanent (Loss) Impact to Wetland Waters of the U.S. 0.2 ac

Kimley-Horn Contact: Chris Tinklenberg, PWS Direct Number: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

Page 1 of 11
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version
Office Use Only:
Corps action ID no. _____________
DWQ project no. _______________
Form Version 1.3 Dec 10 2008
Pre-Construction Notification (PCN) Form
A. Applicant Information
1. Processing
1a. Type(s) of approval sought from the
Corps: Section 404 Permit Section 10 Permit
1b. Specify Nationwide Permit (NWP) number: 14 or General Permit (GP) number:
1c. Has the NWP or GP number been verified by the Corps? Yes No
1d. Type(s) of approval sought from the DWQ (check all that apply):
401 Water Quality Certification – Regular Non-404 Jurisdictional General Permit
401 Water Quality Certification – Express Riparian Buffer Authorization
1e. Is this notification solely for the record
because written approval is not required?

For the record only for DWQ 401
Certification:
Yes No
For the record only for Corps Permit:

Yes No
1f. Is payment into a mitigation bank or in-lieu fee program proposed for mitigation
of impacts? If so, attach the acceptance letter from mitigation bank or in-lieu
fee program.
Yes No

1g. Is the project located in any of NC’s twenty coastal counties. If yes, answer 1h
below.
Yes No

1h. Is the project located within a NC DCM Area of Environmental Concern (AEC)? Yes No
2. Project Information
2a. Name of project: NoDa Sugar Creek
2b. County: Mecklenburg
2c. Nearest municipality / town: Charlotte
2d. Subdivision name: N/A
2e. NCDOT only, T.I.P. or state
project no: N/A
3. Owner Information
3a. Name(s) on Recorded Deed: BP Trail LLC / BP NODA LLC
3b. Deed Book and Page No. 33183 and 233, 239
3c. Responsible Party (for LLC if
applicable): Dan Fitzpatrick
3d. Street address: 3328 Peach Tree Rd NE STE 100
3e. City, state, zip: Atlanta, GA, 30326
3f. Telephone no.: 770.822.2090
3g. Fax no.:
3h. Email address: [e-mail]

Page 2 of 11
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Applicant Information (if different from owner)
4a. Applicant is: Agent Other, specify:
4b. Name:
4c. Business name
(if applicable):
4d. Street address:
4e. City, state, zip:
4f. Telephone no.:
4g. Fax no.:
4h. Email address:
5. Agent/Consultant Information (if applicable)
5a. Name: Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
5b. Business name
(if applicable): Kimley-Horn and Associates
5c. Street address: 200 South Tryon Street, Suite 200
5d. City, state, zip: Charlotte, NC 28202
5e. Telephone no.: 704-409-1802
5f. Fax no.:
5g. Email address: [e-mail]

Page 3 of 11
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

B. Project Information and Prior Project History
1. Property Identification
1a. Property identification no. (tax PIN or parcel ID): 06156005B
1b. Site coordinates (in decimal degrees): Latitude: 35.247920 Longitude: - 80.812634
(DD.DDDDDD) (-DD.DDDDDD)
1c. Property size: 16.02 acres (Project Boundary)
2. Surface Waters
2a. Name of nearest body of water (stream, river, etc.) to proposed
project: Little Sugar Creek
2b. Water Quality Classification of nearest receiving water: Little Sugar Creek - Class "C"
2c. River basin: Catawba; HUC 03050103
3. Project Description
3a. Describe the existing conditions on the site and the general land use in the vicinity of the project at the time of this
application:
The project area is located southeast of the intersection of North Tryon Street and Matheson Avenue, Mecklenburg
County, North Carolina. The project area is currently undeveloped forest land. Existing land use in the vicinity of the
project includes industrial development, commercial development, and undeveloped forested/maintained properties.
3b. List the total estimated acreage of all existing wetlands on the property:
1.33 ac
3c. List the total estimated linear feet of all existing streams (intermittent and perennial) on the property:
The total length of all on-site streams is approximately 1,994 linear feet.
3d. Explain the purpose of the proposed project:
The purpose of the project to construct a new multi-family development including buildings, associated parking lots,
pedestrian connections, and landscaping.
3e. Describe the overall project in detail, including the type of equipment to be used:
The site consists of a roughly 16-acre tract located at 255 Matheson Avenue, which is situated between Matheson
Avenue and Cullman Avenue, in Charlotte, Mecklenburg County. The project site is currently two (2) separate parcels;
PIN’s: 08303150 and 08303151. The site is primarily wooded and bisected by a utility easement and Little Sugar Creek.
Development of the approximately 16-acre residential parcel will include three separate multi-story buildings consisting of
251 individual units, a leasing/amenity center, pool area/courtyard, and associated parking lots. Access into the site
includes a single private driveway off Matheson Avenue and a bridge crossing over Little Sugar Creek connecting the
disjointed site from north to south.
The proposed project seeks to install a 52 linear-foot, 60” reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) along Stream B as part of the
proposed bridge construction. The culvert will be installed no less than one foot below the bed of the stream to allow low
flow passage of water and aquatic life. Rip-rap dissipation is proposed at the inlet and outlet of the proposed pipe to
reduce discharge velocity and meet non-erosive design criteria. Both areas will be constructed using natural channel
design techniques that include ensuring that the rip-rap is properly installed into the channel bed and placed in a fashion
to ensure aquatic passage. The culvert installation and inlet/outlet protections will result in 72 lf of permanent stream
impacts to non-wetland waters of the US. Installation of the culvert requires 40 lf of temporary stream impacts for the
construction activities necessary to work in dry conditions. Additionally, construction of the bridge includes 0.09-ac of
permanent impacts to Wetland B. 0.04-ac of temporary wetland impacts are necessary to facilitate construction of the
retaining wall within Wetland B.
Construction activities on the southern portion of the property include 0.11-ac of permanent wetland impacts to Wetland C
from grading fill slopes necessary for construction of a pedestrian footpath. 0.04-ac of temporary wetland impacts are
necessary to Wetland C to construct the retaining wall for the footpath.
General construction equipment, such as; bulldozers, back hoes, front end loaders, etc. will be used for construction
purposes.

Page 4 of 11
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Jurisdictional Determinations
4a. Have jurisdictional wetland or stream determinations by the Corps
or State been requested or obtained for this property / project
(including all prior phases) in the past?
Comments:
Yes No Unknown
4b. If the Corps made the jurisdictional determination, what type of
determination was made? Preliminary Final
4c. If yes, who delineated the jurisdictional areas?
Name (if known): Chris Tinklenberg, PWS
Agency/Consultant Company: Kimley-Horn &
Assoc., Inc.
Other:
4d. If yes, list the dates of the Corps jurisdictional determinations or State determinations and attach documentation.
Field verification visit on August 31, 2018
5. Project History
5a. Have permits or certifications been requested or obtained for this
project (including all prior phases) in the past? Yes No Unknown
5b. If yes, explain in detail according to “help file” instructions.

6. Future Project Plans
6a. Is this a phased project? Yes No
6b. If yes, explain.

Page 5 of 11
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

C. Proposed Impacts Inventory
1. Impacts Summary
1a. Which sections were completed below for your project (check all that apply):
Wetlands Streams - tributaries Buffers
Open Waters Pond Construction
2. Wetland Impacts
If there are wetland impacts proposed on the site, then complete this question for each wetland area impacted.
2a.
Wetland impact
number –
Permanent (P)
or Temporary
(T)
2b.

Type of impact
2c.

Type of wetland
(if known)
2d.

Forested

2e.
Type of jurisdiction
(Corps - 404, 10
DWQ – non-404, other)
2f.

Area of impact
(acres)
WB – Impact 3
P T Grading Fill Riparian Yes
No
Corps
DWQ 0.09
WB – Impact 4
P T
Construction of
retaining wall Riparian Yes
No
Corps
DWQ 0.04
WC – Impact 5
P T Grading Fill Riparian Yes
No
Corps
DWQ 0.11
WC – Impact 6
P T
Construction of
retaining wall Riparian Yes
No
Corps
DWQ 0.04
2g. Total wetland impacts 0.28
2h. Comments: Construction of the bridge consists of 0.09-ac of permanent impacts to Wetland B. 0.04-ac of temporary
wetland impacts are necessary to facilitate construction of the retaining wall within Wetland B.
Construction activities on the southern portion of the property include 0.11-ac of permanent wetland impacts to Wetland C
from grading fill slopes necessary for construction of a pedestrian footpath. 0.04-ac of temporary wetland impacts are
necessary to Wetland C to construct the retaining wall for the footpath. In total, 0.2-ac of permanent wetland impacts, and
0.1-ac of temporary wetland impacts are proposed.
3. Stream Impacts
If there are perennial or intermittent stream impacts (including temporary impacts) proposed on the site, then complete this
question for all stream sites impacted.
3a.
Stream impact
number -
Permanent (P)
or Temporary
(T)
3b.
Type of impact
3c.
Stream name
3d.
Perennial
(PER) or
intermittent
(INT)?
3e.
Type of jurisdiction
(Corps - 404, 10
DWQ – non-404,
other)
3f.
Average
stream
width
(feet)
3g.
Impact
length
(linear
feet)
SB – Impact 1
P T Installation of RCP UT to Little Sugar
Creek
PER
INT
Corps
DWQ 3 72
SB – Impact 2
P T
Impervious Dike and
Pumped Diversion
UT to Little Sugar
Creek
PER
INT
Corps
DWQ 3 40
3h. Total stream and tributary impacts 112
3i. Comments: The proposed project seeks to install a 52 linear-foot, 60” reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) along Stream B as
part of the proposed bridge construction. The culvert will be installed no less than one foot below the bed of the stream to
allow low flow passage of water and aquatic life. Rip-rap dissipation is proposed at the inlet and outlet of the proposed pipe to
reduce discharge velocity and meet non-erosive design criteria. Both areas will be constructed using natural channel design
techniques that include ensuring that the rip-rap is properly installed into the channel bed and placed in a fashion to ensure
aquatic passage. The culvert installation and inlet/outlet protections will result in 72 lf of permanent stream impacts to non-
wetland waters of the US. Installation of the culvert requires 40 lf of temporary stream impacts for the construction activities
necessary to work in dry conditions. In total, the proposed project seeks 72 lf of permanent stream impacts and 40 lf of
temporary stream impacts.

Page 6 of 11
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

4. Open Water Impacts
If there are proposed impacts to lakes, ponds, estuaries, tributaries, sounds, the Atlantic Ocean, or any other open water of
the U.S. then individually list all open water impacts below.
4a.
Open water
impact number
– Permanent
(P) or
Temporary (T)
4b.
Name of waterbody
(if applicable)
4c.

Type of impact
4d.

Waterbody type
4e.

Area of impact (acres)
O1 P T
O2 P T
O3 P T
O4 P T
4f. Total open water impacts
4g. Comments:
5. Pond or Lake Construction
If pond or lake construction proposed, then complete the chart below.
5a.

Pond ID
number
5b.

Proposed use or purpose of
pond

5c.
Wetland Impacts (acres)
5d.
Stream Impacts (feet)
5e.
Upland
(acres)
Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded Filled Excavated Flooded
P1
P2
5f. Total
5g. Comments:
5h. Is a dam high hazard permit required?
Yes No If yes, permit ID no:
5i. Expected pond surface area (acres):
5j. Size of pond watershed (acres):
5k. Method of construction:

Page 7 of 11
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

6. Buffer Impacts (for DWQ)
If project will impact a protected riparian buffer, then complete the chart below. If yes, then individually list all buffer impacts
below. If any impacts require mitigation, then you MUST fill out Section D of this form.
6a.
Project is in which protected basin?
Neuse Tar-Pamlico Other:
Catawba Randleman
6b.
Buffer impact
number –
Permanent (P)
or Temporary
(T)
6c.

Reason
for impact
6d.

Stream name
6e.

Buffer
mitigation
required?
6f.

Zone 1 impact
(square feet)
6g.

Zone 2 impact
(square feet)
B1 P T Yes
No
B2 P T Yes
No
B3 P T Yes
No
6h. Total buffer impacts
6i. Comments:
D. Impact Justification and Mitigation
1. Avoidance and Minimization
1a. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts in designing project.
Avoidance and minimization efforts during development planning and design were implemented to the greatest extents
practicable in order to reduce the overall impacts on the aquatic environment while staying within nationwide permit
thresholds. Large retaining walls are proposed throughout the entirety of the site to eliminate fill slopes which would result in
additional stream and wetland impacts. Initial site layout and grading plans proposed over 600 lf of stream impacts and nearly
1-acre of wetland impacts. Through multiple iterations of siting and the implementation of retaining walls, the final plan
demonstrates maximum minimization efforts by reducing the proposed stream and wetland impacts to 72 lf and 0.2-ac,
respectively.
1b. Specifically describe measures taken to avoid or minimize the proposed impacts through construction techniques.
Temporary wetland impacts associated with construction of the retaining walls were limited to the areas necessary for the
contractor to conduct the construction activity. Construction activities associated with the stream location are limited to the
areas within the top of bank of the new channel to avoid additional temporary wetland impacts. All temporary impacts will be
restored to preconstruction conditions following completion of the activities. All temporary erosion and sediment control
measures will be removed and disturbed areas will be restored following construction.
2. Compensatory Mitigation for Impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State
2a. Does the project require Compensatory Mitigation for
impacts to Waters of the U.S. or Waters of the State?
Yes No

2b. If yes, mitigation is required by (check all that apply): DWQ Corps
2c. If yes, which mitigation option will be used for this project?
Mitigation bank
Payment to in-lieu fee program
Permittee Responsible Mitigation
3. Complete if Using a Mitigation Bank
3a. Name of Mitigation Bank:
3b. Credits Purchased (attach receipt and letter) Type Quantity

Page 8 of 11
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

3c. Comments:
4. Complete if Making a Payment to In-lieu Fee Program
4a. Approval letter from in-lieu fee program is attached. Yes
4b. Stream mitigation requested: 252 linear feet
4c. If using stream mitigation, stream temperature: warm cool cold
4d. Buffer mitigation requested (DWQ only): square feet
4e. Riparian wetland mitigation requested: 0.8 acres
4f. Non-riparian wetland mitigation requested: acres
4g. Coastal (tidal) wetland mitigation requested: acres
4h. Comments: Compensatory mitigation will be met by the purchase of credits through the NC Division of Mitigation Services
(NCDMS) in-lieu fee program. 72 lf of stream impacts will be mitigated through the purchase of stream mitigation credits.
Based on an NCSAM assessment of intermittent Stream B, mitigation is proposed at a 1.75:1 ratio. Since the project is
located within the Lower Catawba watershed (HUC 03050103), credits will be purchased at a 3.5:1 ratio; therefore, 252 SMUs
will be purchased from NCDMS for impacts associated with the new development. 0.2-ac of wetland impacts will be mitigated
through the purchase of wetland mitigation credits. Based on an NCWAM assessment of Wetlands B and C, mitigation is
proposed at a 1.5:1 ratio. Wetland mitigation credits will be purchased at 3:1 based on the location of the project within the
Lower Catawba watershed, therefore, 0.6 wetland credits will be purchased from NCDMS for wetland impacts.
5. Complete if Using a Permittee Responsible Mitigation Plan
5a. If using a permittee responsible mitigation plan, provide a description of the proposed mitigation plan.

6. Buffer Mitigation (State Regulated Riparian Buffer Rules) – required by DWQ
6a. Will the project result in an impact within a protected riparian buffer that requires
buffer mitigation?
Yes No

6b. If yes, then identify the square feet of impact to each zone of the riparian buffer that requires mitigation. Calculate the
amount of mitigation required.
Zone
6c.
Reason for impact
6d.
Total impact
(square feet)

Multiplier
6e.
Required mitigation
(square feet)
Zone 1 3 (2 for Catawba)
Zone 2 1.5
6f. Total buffer mitigation required:
6g. If buffer mitigation is required, discuss what type of mitigation is proposed (e.g., payment to private mitigation bank,
permittee responsible riparian buffer restoration, payment into an approved in-lieu fee fund).

6h. Comments:

Page 9 of 11
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

E. Stormwater Management and Diffuse Flow Plan (required by DWQ)
1. Diffuse Flow Plan
1a. Does the project include or is it adjacent to protected riparian buffers identified
within one of the NC Riparian Buffer Protection Rules? Yes No
1b. If yes, then is a diffuse flow plan included? If no, explain why.
Comments: The project is not subject to the NC Riparian Protection Rules; however,
the project meets the City of Charlotte 30-FT Post Construction Buffer & City of
Charlotte 100-FT Post Construction Buffer requirements.
Yes No
2. Stormwater Management Plan
2a. What is the overall percent imperviousness of this project? 45%
2b. Does this project require a Stormwater Management Plan? Yes No
2c. If this project DOES NOT require a Stormwater Management Plan, explain why: N/A
2d. If this project DOES require a Stormwater Management Plan, then provide a brief, narrative description of the plan:
Per City of Charlotte Post Construction Stormwater Ordinance and the Charlotte-Mecklenburg Storm Water Design
Manual, the project will control peak discharge of the 10-year, 6-hour storm event as well as detain the 1-year, 24-hour
channel protection volume in accordance with the transit-oriented development requirements. Though not required due to
location/zoning, the project has elected to treat a portion (+/-3.62 acres) for stormwater quality of the 1-in, 6hr-storm event
for 85% Total Suspended Solids (TSS) removal as mitigation for buffer impact.
2e. Who will be responsible for the review of the Stormwater Management Plan?
Certified Local Government
DWQ Stormwater Program
DWQ 401 Unit
3. Certified Local Government Stormwater Review
3a. In which local government’s jurisdiction is this project? City of Charlotte
3b. Which of the following locally-implemented stormwater management programs
apply (check all that apply):
Phase II
NSW
USMP
Water Supply Watershed
Other:
3c. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached?
Yes No – Under review
4. DWQ Stormwater Program Review
4a. Which of the following state-implemented stormwater management programs apply
(check all that apply):
Coastal counties
HQW
ORW
Session Law 2006-246
Other:
4b. Has the approved Stormwater Management Plan with proof of approval been
attached? Yes No
5. DWQ 401 Unit Stormwater Review
5a. Does the Stormwater Management Plan meet the appropriate requirements? Yes No

Page 10 of 11
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5b. Have all of the 401 Unit submittal requirements been met? Yes No
F. Supplementary Information
1. Environmental Documentation (DWQ Requirement)
1a. Does the project involve an expenditure of public (federal/state/local) funds or the
use of public (federal/state) land? Yes No
1b. If you answered “yes” to the above, does the project require preparation of an
environmental document pursuant to the requirements of the National or State
(North Carolina) Environmental Policy Act (NEPA/SEPA)?
Yes No
1c. If you answered “yes” to the above, has the document review been finalized by the
State Clearing House? (If so, attach a copy of the NEPA or SEPA final approval
letter.)
Comments:
Yes No
2. Violations (DWQ Requirement)
2a. Is the site in violation of DWQ Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .0500), Isolated
Wetland Rules (15A NCAC 2H .1300), DWQ Surface Water or Wetland Standards,
or Riparian Buffer Rules (15A NCAC 2B .0200)?
Yes No
2b. Is this an after-the-fact permit application? Yes No
2c. If you answered “yes” to one or both of the above questions, provide an explanation of the violation(s):
3. Cumulative Impacts (DWQ Requirement)
3a. Will this project (based on past and reasonably anticipated future impacts) result in
additional development, which could impact nearby downstream water quality? Yes No
3b. If you answered “yes” to the above, submit a qualitative or quantitative cumulative impact analysis in accordance with the
most recent DWQ policy. If you answered “no,” provide a short narrative description.

4. Sewage Disposal (DWQ Requirement)
4a. Clearly detail the ultimate treatment methods and disposition (non-discharge or discharge) of wastewater generated from
the proposed project, or available capacity of the subject facility.
Waste water directed to a Charlotte Water public sewer main adjacent to the project.

Page 11 of 11
PCN Form – Version 1.3 December 10, 2008 Version

5. Endangered Species and Designated Critical Habitat (Corps Requirement)
5a. Will this project occur in or near an area with federally protected species or
habitat? Yes No
5b. Have you checked with the USFWS concerning Endangered Species Act
impacts? Yes No
5c. If yes, indicate the USFWS Field Office you have contacted. Raleigh
Asheville
5d. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Endangered Species or Designated Critical
Habitat?
A review of the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (NCNHP) database on November 5, 2018 did not indicate
known occurrences of threatened or endangered species within the project boundary. Additionally, pedestrian surveys
conducted by Kimley-Horn in August 2018 did not identify any occurrences of protected species. (See attached NCNHP
Letter).
6. Essential Fish Habitat (Corps Requirement)
6a. Will this project occur in or near an area designated as essential fish habitat? Yes No
6b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact Essential Fish Habitat?
NCNHP element occurrence database did not indicate the presence of EFH within the project boundary.
7. Historic or Prehistoric Cultural Resources (Corps Requirement)
7a. Will this project occur in or near an area that the state, federal or tribal
governments have designated as having historic or cultural preservation
status (e.g., National Historic Trust designation or properties significant in
North Carolina history and archaeology)?
Yes No
7b. What data sources did you use to determine whether your site would impact historic or archeological resources?
A review of the North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) HPOWEB GIS Service database on November
5, 2018 did not indicate any cultural or historic resources within the project boundary.
8. Flood Zone Designation (Corps Requirement)
8a. Will this project occur in a FEMA-designated 100-year floodplain? Yes No
8b. If yes, explain how project meets FEMA requirements: A flood impact analysis report, no-rise impact certification, and
individual floodplain development permit will be submitted to the City of Charlotte for review and approval prior to
construction/restoration activities. The results of the flood impact analysis show that there is no net increase in base flood
elevations.
8c. What source(s) did you use to make the floodplain determination? FIRM Panels 4555 and 4554

Chris Tinklenberg, PWS

Applicant/Agent's Printed Name

_______________________________
Applicant/Agent's Signature
(Agent's signature is valid only if an authorization letter from the applicant
is provided.)

12/17/2019

Date

M
a
t
h
e
s
o
n

A
v
eN. Tryon St.0 200 400Feet
±
Figure 5Proposed ConditionsBrand Properties NoDa Sugar CreekMecklenburg County, NCDecember 17, 2019
Stream B - Impact 240 lf TemporaryImpervious Dike andPumped Diversion
Stream B - Impact 172 lf Permanent Culvert Installation
Wetland C - Impact 50.11 ac Permanent Grading Fill
Wetland C - Impact 60.04 ac TemporaryConstruction of Retaining Wall
Wetland B - Impact 30.09 ac PermanentGrading Fill
Wetland B - Impact 40.04 ac TemporaryConstruction of Retaining Wall
Legend
Project Boundary (Limits of Disturbance)BuildingsPermanent Wetland ImpactPipes/CulvertsRetaining Walls
Site Plan LayoutProposed GradingExisting StreamsExisting Wetlands
THE EXCHANGEPREPARED FORBP NODA, LLCCOVER SHEET
C0-1©SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS FOR
SITE LOCATION MAP
BRAND PROPERTIES
3328 PEACHTREE ROAD N.E., STE 100
ATLANTA, GEORGIA, 30326
[phone] TEL
CONTACT: MICHAEL ADAMS
KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
200 SOUTH TRYON STREET, SUITE 200
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 28202
[phone] TEL
CONTACT: JOHN HOLCOMB, P.E.
ARCHITECT:ENGINEER:
PROJECT OWNER AND CONSULTANT INFORMATION
OWNER:
STUDIO ARCHITECTS
1000 MARIETTA STREET NW, SUITE 244
ATLANTA, GA 30318
[phone] TEL
CONTACT: JAMES ANDERSON, RA
UTILITY AND GOVERNING AGENCIES
CONTACT LIST:
THE EXCHANGE2710 CHICK GODLEY ROAD
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA, 28206
01976500612/10/2019
PREPARED BY:
REV.DATE REVISIONS PAGES
Know what's
R
NOTES:
SITE
SURVEYOR:
A.G. ZOUTEWELLE SURVEYORS
1418 EAST 5TH STREET
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA, 28204
[phone] TEL
CONTACT: ANDY ZOUTEWELLE, RLS
THE PROJECT SITE DOES LIE WITHIN A FLOOD HAZARD AREA PER FIRM
PANEL 3710455500L AND 3710455400K DATED 09/02/2015 AND 02/19/2014.
FEMA MAP
ZONING DEPARTMENT
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
7605 DISTRICT DRIVE
CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA 28213
[phone]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
EROSION CONTROL
PLANNING DEPARTMENTFIRE MARSHAL
SANITARY SEWER COMPANY
WATER COMPANY
CHARLOTTE WATER
600 EAST 4TH STREET
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
[phone]
POWER COMPANY
CABLE COMPANY
GAS COMPANY
CHARLOTTE FIRE DEPARTMENT
500 DALTON AVENUE
CHARLOTTE, NC 28206
[phone]
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
GINA HODGES
600 EAST 4TH STREET
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
[phone]
DUKE ENERGY
526 SOUTH CHURCH STREET
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
[phone]
SPECTRUM
[phone]
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS
4720 PIEDMONT ROW DRIVE
CHARLOTTE, NC 28210
[phone]
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
600 EAST 4TH STREET
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
[phone]
CITY OF CHARLOTTE
600 EAST 4TH STREET
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
[phone]
CHARLOTTE WATER
600 EAST 4TH STREET
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
[phone]
CHARLOTTE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
600 EAST 4TH STREET
CHARLOTTE, NC 28202
[phone]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
SEDIMENT & EROSION CONTROL
INSPECTOR
GINA HODGES (CITY OF CHARLOTTE)
[phone]
SITE INSPECTOR
GARY BENNER (CITY OF CHARLOTTE)
[phone]
ENGINEERING INSPECTOR
ROBERT ZINK (CITY OF CHARLOTTE)
[phone]
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
THE FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE IS FURNISHED AS A
GENERAL GUIDE FOR PREPARATION OF A SEQUENCE OF
MODIFICATIONS SHOULD BE MADE AS APPROPRIATE.
PHASE 2:
PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITH EACH PHASE, CONTRACTOR SHALL MEET
WITH THE CITY OF CHARLOTTE EROSION CONTROL INSPECTOR.
CONTACT GINA HODGES [phone].
1. SCHEDULE AN ON-SITE INSPECTION BY CITY OF CHARLOTTE
GRADING PERMIT. UPON RECEIPT OF THE GRADING PERMIT,
CLEARING AND GRUBBING MAY BEGIN.
2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DILIGENTLY AND CONTINUOUSLY
MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AND STRUCTURES.
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN CLOSE CONTACT WITH THE
CITY INSPECTOR SO THAT PERIODIC INSPECTIONS CAN BE
PERFORMED AT APPROPRIATE STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION.
3.
OF RETAINING WALL SHOWN IN PHASE 2. BEGIN GRADING
BUILDING PADS. MAINTAIN AND VERTICALLY ADJUST ALL
TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCHES, ROCK CHECK DAMS, HIGH
HAZARD SILT FENCE, SILT FENCE, AND OTHER MEASURES AS
SHOWN ON PLANS TO MAINTAIN DRAINAGE PATTERNS.
CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES
DO NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT CONSTRUCTABILITY OF THE
PROJECT.
4. TEMPORARILY STABILIZE, THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION,
IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING THE COMPLETION OF THE MOST
RECENT LAND DISTURBING/GRADING ACTIVITY, ANY DISTURBED
AREAS, INCLUDING MATERIAL STOCKPILES THAT ARE
SCHEDULED OR LIKELY TO REMAIN INACTIVE FOR 7 DAYS OR
MORE.
5. IMMEDIATELY INITIATE PERMANENT STABILIZATION OF AREAS TO
BE VEGETATED AS THEY ARE BROUGHT TO FINAL GRADE.
GRADED SLOPES AND FILLS ARE TO BE PLANTED OR PROVIDED
WITH PROTECTIVE COVER SUFFICIENT TO RESTRAIN EROSION
WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER THE COMPLETION OF ANY
PHASE OF GRADING.
6. BEGIN INSTALLATION OF RETAINING WALLS AS SHOWN IN PHASE2.
7. AS SLOPES ARE BROUGHT TO PHASE 2 GRADES, CONTRACTOR
SHALL TERRACE SLOPES GREATER THAN 10 VERTICAL FEET PER
CLDS 30.16.
EROSION CONTROL NOTES:
1. ALL "STD." NUMBERS REFER TO THE CITY OF CHARLOTTE LAND
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS MANUAL (CLDSM)
2. ANY GRADING BEYOND THE DENUDED LIMITS SHOWN ON THE PLAN IS A
VIOLATION OF THE COUNTY EROSION CONTROL ORDINANCE AND IS
SUBJECT TO A FINE.
3. GRADING MORE THAN ONE ACRE WITHOUT AN APPROVED EROSION
CONTROL PLAN IS A VIOLATION OF THE COUNTY EROSION CONTROL
ORDINANCE AND IS SUBJECT TO A FINE.
4. ALL PERIMETER AREAS AND SLOPES GREATER THAN 3:1 SHALL BE
STABILIZED WITHIN 7 DAYS. GROUND STABILIZATION ON ALL OTHER AREAS
MUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN 14 DAYS. REFER TO THE EROSION CONTROL
ORDINANCE FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS.
5. ADDITIONAL MEASURES TO CONTROL EROSION AND SEDIMENT MAY BE
REQUIRED BY A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE COUNTY.
6. A GRADING PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED FOR ANY LOT GRADING EXCEEDING
ONE ACRE THAT WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED.
7. ALL EMBANKMENTS MUST BE CONSTRUCTED PER SECTION 4.0.6
EMBANKMENT REQUIREMENTS IN THE BMP DESIGN MANUAL.
8. SLOPES SHALL BE GRADED NO STEEPER THAN 2:1. SLOPES GREATER
THAN 10 VERTICAL FEET REQUIRE ADEQUATE TERRACING (CLDSM # 30.16).
SOILS ENGINEER TO VERIFY STABILITY OF SLOPES GREATER THAN 2:1.
9. SOIL COMPACTION TESTS ARE REQUIRED ON ANY BERM >= 5' IN HEIGHT
FROM THE NATURAL GRADE. SOIL COMPACTION MUST BE AT 95%
PROCTOR AND CERTIFIED BY A LICENSED SOIL ENGINEER.THE EXCHANGEPREPARED FORBP NODA, LLCEROSION CONTROLPHASE 2C2-3Know what's
RNORTHXxXSOIL TYPE
EROSION CONTROL LEGEND
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR
EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR
PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR
PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR
SLOPE ARROW
SWPPP INFORMATION SIGN
PROPERTY LINE
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE; CLDS 30.06A
TEMPORARY SLOPE MATTING - SC150
OR GREATER
TEMPORARY JUTE NETTING BAFFLES;
CLDS 30.19
CATCH BASIN INLET PROTECTION;
CLDS 30.15
CONSTRUCTION EXIT, SEE DETAIL
30.11A
LOD
SIS
CE
SM
SF
JN
IPC
TEMPORARY DIVERSION DITCH;
CLDS 30.05
SLOPE DRAIN
SKIMMER
SILT FENCE OUTLET (LOCATED AT LOW
POINTS ALONG SILT FENCE); CLDS
30.06C
DD#
SD#
SK
SFO
RIP-RAP APRONRR
DRAINAGE AREA
CHECK DAMCD
HIGH HAZARD TEMPORARY SILT FENCE;
CLDS 30.06BHH
DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS:
GRADING SHALL BE LIMITED TO 20 ACRES IN CRITICAL OR PROTECTED AREAS, UNLESS
APPROVED BY CITY/ COUNTY ENGINEER.
SUFFICIENT ACCESS FOR CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE MUST BE ALLOWED AT TOE
OF FILL SLOPES AND RETAINING WALLS.
PRE-CONSTRUCTION AND POST-CONSTRUCTION IMPACT SURVEYS INCLUDING DEPTH
MEASUREMENTS ARE TO BE CONDUCTED IN ANY RECEIVING LAKE, COVE, OR POND.
FILL SLOPE STEEPNESS SHALL BE LIMITED TO 3:1 (THREE FOOT HORIZONTAL TO ONE
FOOT VERTICAL). ALL SLOPES MUST HAVE SLOPE BREAKS AS SET FORTH IN THE NC SOIL
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING & DESIGN MANUAL, TABLE 6.02A.
ALL DIVERSION DITCHES AND INTERIOR BASIN SLOPES MUST BE LINED WITH AN
APPROPRIATE ROLLED EROSION CONTROL PRODUCT (RECP).
HIGH HAZARD SILT FENCE IS REQUIRED ALONG DENUDED LIMITS AND A DOUBLE ROW OF
HIGH HAZARD SILT FENCE IS REQUIRED ALONG WETLANDS, STREAMS, LAKES, OR OTHER
SURFACE WATER BODIES AS WELL AS ADJACENT TO ALL WATER QUALITY BUFFERS.
ALL BASINS AND SPILLWAYS SHALL BE SIZED TO PASS THE 25-YEAR STORM EVENT.
ALL BASINS MUST PROVIDE ADDITIONAL STORAGE VOLUME IN A ROCK COFFER FOREBAY.
POLYACRYLAMIDES IN BASINS AND SILT-SACKS AT SKIMMER OUTFLOWS MAY BE
REQUIRED.
SITE MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS:
POLYACRYLAMIDES IN BASINS AND SILT-SACKS AT SKIMMER OUTFLOWS MAY BE
REQUIRED.
TEMPORARY GROUND COVER MUST BE PROVIDED FOR WITHIN 5 DAYS OF ANY PHASE OF
GRADING.
ALL CRITICAL AREA PLANS WILL CARRY A "PERFORMANCE RESERVATION".
ALL LOG BOOK ENTRIES WILL BE ELECTRONICALLY SENT TO THE AREA INSPECTOR.
FOR PROJECTS GREATER THAN 10 ACRES IN SIZE TURBIDITY MEASUREMENTS (OR
TRANSPARENT TUBE READINGS) ARE REQUIRED TO MEASURE CLARITY OF BASIN
EFFLUENT AND ANY POTENTIAL IMPACT TO RECEIVING WATERS AT THE TIME OF
RAINFALL-TRIGGERED INSPECTIONS. READINGS MUST BE COLLECTED AT THE BASIN
OUTFALL (TO MEASURE CLARITY OF BASIN EFFLUENT), UPSTREAM OF THE DISCHARGE
POINT (TO MEASURE BASELINE CONDITIONS), AND DOWNSTREAM OF THE DISCHARGE
POINT (TO MEASURE STREAM IMPACTS OF BASIN EFFLUENT). THE RESULTS MUST BE
LOGGED IN THE INSPECTION REPORT.
ENHANCED EROSION CONTROL CHECKLIST
1. INLET PROTECTION MUST BE CLEANED AFTER EVERY
RAINFALL EVENT. CURB AND GUTTER SHOULD BE SWEPT
AND KEPT CLEAR.
2. PERIMETER SILT FENCE AND TREE PROTECTION FENCE
SHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL REFERENCE ONLY. PERIMETER
PROTECTION MUST BE AT LEAST 3' FROM TOE OF ADJACENT
SLOPE TO ALLOW ROOM FOR ACCESS AND MAINTENANCE.
GENERAL NOTES
CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE
THE FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE IS FURNISHED AS A
GENERAL GUIDE FOR PREPARATION OF A SEQUENCE OF
SHOULD BE MADE AS APPROPRIATE.
PHASE 3:
PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITH EACH PHASE, CONTRACTOR SHALL MEET WITH
THE CITY OF CHARLOTTE EROSION CONTROL INSPECTOR. CONTACT GINA
HODGES [phone].
1. BEGIN INSTALLATION OF RETAINING WALLS AS SHOWN IN PHASE 3.
REMOVE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AND TEMPORARY PIPE AND
JUNCTION BOX AS SHOWN IN PHASE 3. RESTORE ALL AREAS IMPACTED
BY TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ACCESS TO THE PRE-EXISTING
CONDITIONS.
2. AS PAVING STONE BASE IS INSTALLED, REMOVE SEDIMENT BASIN,
REMOVE RIPRAP FROM BMP SPILLWAY, COMPLETE GRADING IN
DIVERSION DITCHES AND TEMPORARY SWALE AREAS ROUTE ALL
STORMWATER TO STORM SYSTEM. REMOVE ANY SOFT SUBBASE
MATERIALS AND PLACE STRUCTURAL FILL AS REQUIRED BY
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER.
3. INSTALL REMAINING STORM SEWER, SAND FILTER, AND PERMANENT
UNDERGROUND DETENTION SYSTEM. SKIMMER TO BE USED INSIDE
PERMANENT UNDERGROUND DETENTION SYSTEM AT OUTFALL
STRUCTURE UNTIL FINAL STABILIZATION.
4. INSTALL APPROPRIATE INLET PROTECTION DEVICES AS WORK
PROGRESSES, PER BMP DETAILS.
5. CONSTRUCT PAVING AREAS AS SHOWN IN PHASE 3. INSTALL CURB
AND CUTTER AND PAVING STONE BASE TO STABILIZE PARKING LOT.
6. DILIGENTLY AND CONTINUOUSLY MAINTAIN ALL EROSION CONTROL
SHALL MAINTAIN CLOSE CONTACT WITH THE CITY OF CHARLOTTE
INSPECTOR SO THAT PERIODIC INSPECTIONS CAN BE PERFORMED AT
APPROPRIATE STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION.
7. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE N.C. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
PLANNING AND DESIGN MANUAL, U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE,
MECKLENBURG COUNTY SOIL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION
CONTROL ORDINANCE, AND THE CITY OF CHARLOTTE EROSION
CONTROL STANDARDS.
8. COORDINATE WITH EROSION CONTROL INSPECTOR PRIOR TO
REMOVAL OF ANY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES. PERMANENT
UNDERGROUND DETENTION SYSTEM TO BE CLEANED OUT PRIOR TO
COMPLETION OF EROSION CONTROL MEASURES CLOSE OUT.
SEDIMENT & EROSION CONTROL INSPECTOR
GINA HODGES (CITY OF CHARLOTTE)
[phone]
SITE INSPECTOR
GARY BENNER (CITY OF CHARLOTTE)
[phone]
ENGINEERING INSPECTOR
ROBERT ZINK (CITY OF CHARLOTTE)
[phone]
EROSION CONTROL NOTES:
1. ALL "STD." NUMBERS REFER TO THE CITY OF CHARLOTTE LAND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
MANUAL (CLDSM)
2. ANY GRADING BEYOND THE DENUDED LIMITS SHOWN ON THE PLAN IS A VIOLATION OF THECOUNTY EROSION CONTROL ORDINANCE AND IS SUBJECT TO A FINE.
3. GRADING MORE THAN ONE ACRE WITHOUT AN APPROVED EROSION CONTROL PLAN IS AVIOLATION OF THE COUNTY EROSION CONTROL ORDINANCE AND IS SUBJECT TO A FINE.
4. ALL PERIMETER AREAS AND SLOPES GREATER THAN 3:1 SHALL BE STABILIZED WITHIN 7 DAYS.
GROUND STABILIZATION ON ALL OTHER AREAS MUST BE COMPLETED WITHIN 14 DAYS. REFER
TO THE EROSION CONTROL ORDINANCE FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS.
5. ADDITIONAL MEASURES TO CONTROL EROSION AND SEDIMENT MAY BE REQUIRED BY A
REPRESENTATIVE OF THE COUNTY.
6. A GRADING PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED FOR ANY LOT GRADING EXCEEDING ONE ACRE THAT
WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED.
7. ALL EMBANKMENTS MUST BE CONSTRUCTED PER SECTION 4.0.6 EMBANKMENTREQUIREMENTS IN THE BMP DESIGN MANUAL.
8. SLOPES SHALL BE GRADED NO STEEPER THAN 2:1. SLOPES GREATER THAN 10 VERTICAL FEETREQUIRE ADEQUATE TERRACING (MCLDSM # 30.16). SOILS ENGINEER TO VERIFY STABILITY OF
SLOPES GREATER THAN 2:1.
9. SOIL COMPACTION TESTS ARE REQUIRED ON ANY BERM >= 5' IN HEIGHT FROM THE NATURAL
GRADE. SOIL COMPACTION MUST BE AT 95% PROCTOR AND CERTIFIED BY A LICENSED SOILENGINEER.THE EXCHANGEPREPARED FORBP NODA, LLCEROSION CONTROLPHASE 3C2-4Know what's
RNORTHXxXSOIL TYPE
EROSION CONTROL LEGEND
LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE
EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR
EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR
PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR
PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR
SLOPE ARROW
PROPERTY LINE
TEMPORARY SILT FENCE
PERMANENT STABILIZATION SEEDING
CATCH BASIN INLET PROTECTION;
CLDS 30.15
CONSTRUCTION EXIT, SEE DETAIL
30.11A
LOD
CE
PS
SF
IPC
SILT FENCE OUTLETSFO
RIP-RAP APRONRR
DRAINAGE AREA
STONE FILTER RINGSFR
HARDWARE CLOTH AND GRAVEL INLET
PROTECTION; CLDS 30.15IPH
DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS:
GRADING SHALL BE LIMITED TO 20 ACRES IN CRITICAL OR PROTECTED AREAS, UNLESS
APPROVED BY CITY/ COUNTY ENGINEER.
SUFFICIENT ACCESS FOR CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE MUST BE ALLOWED AT TOE
OF FILL SLOPES AND RETAINING WALLS.
PRE-CONSTRUCTION AND POST-CONSTRUCTION IMPACT SURVEYS INCLUDING DEPTH
MEASUREMENTS ARE TO BE CONDUCTED IN ANY RECEIVING LAKE, COVE, OR POND.
FILL SLOPE STEEPNESS SHALL BE LIMITED TO 3:1 (THREE FOOT HORIZONTAL TO ONE
FOOT VERTICAL). ALL SLOPES MUST HAVE SLOPE BREAKS AS SET FORTH IN THE NC SOIL
EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANNING & DESIGN MANUAL, TABLE 6.02A.
ALL DIVERSION DITCHES AND INTERIOR BASIN SLOPES MUST BE LINED WITH AN
APPROPRIATE ROLLED EROSION CONTROL PRODUCT (RECP).
HIGH HAZARD SILT FENCE IS REQUIRED ALONG DENUDED LIMITS AND A DOUBLE ROW OF
HIGH HAZARD SILT FENCE IS REQUIRED ALONG WETLANDS, STREAMS, LAKES, OR OTHER
SURFACE WATER BODIES AS WELL AS ADJACENT TO ALL WATER QUALITY BUFFERS.
ALL BASINS AND SPILLWAYS SHALL BE SIZED TO PASS THE 25-YEAR STORM EVENT.
ALL BASINS MUST PROVIDE ADDITIONAL STORAGE VOLUME IN A ROCK COFFER FOREBAY.
POLYACRYLAMIDES IN BASINS AND SILT-SACKS AT SKIMMER OUTFLOWS MAY BE
REQUIRED.
SITE MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS:
POLYACRYLAMIDES IN BASINS AND SILT-SACKS AT SKIMMER OUTFLOWS MAY BE
REQUIRED.
TEMPORARY GROUND COVER MUST BE PROVIDED FOR WITHIN 5 DAYS OF ANY PHASE OF
GRADING.
ALL CRITICAL AREA PLANS WILL CARRY A "PERFORMANCE RESERVATION".
ALL LOG BOOK ENTRIES WILL BE ELECTRONICALLY SENT TO THE AREA INSPECTOR.
FOR PROJECTS GREATER THAN 10 ACRES IN SIZE TURBIDITY MEASUREMENTS (OR
TRANSPARENT TUBE READINGS) ARE REQUIRED TO MEASURE CLARITY OF BASIN
EFFLUENT AND ANY POTENTIAL IMPACT TO RECEIVING WATERS AT THE TIME OF
RAINFALL-TRIGGERED INSPECTIONS. READINGS MUST BE COLLECTED AT THE BASIN
OUTFALL (TO MEASURE CLARITY OF BASIN EFFLUENT), UPSTREAM OF THE DISCHARGE
POINT (TO MEASURE BASELINE CONDITIONS), AND DOWNSTREAM OF THE DISCHARGE
POINT (TO MEASURE STREAM IMPACTS OF BASIN EFFLUENT). THE RESULTS MUST BE
LOGGED IN THE INSPECTION REPORT.
ENHANCED EROSION CONTROL CHECKLIST
1. INLET PROTECTION MUST BE CLEANED AFTER EVERY RAINFALL EVENT. CURB AND
GUTTER SHOULD BE SWEPT AND KEPT CLEAR.
2. PERIMETER SILT FENCE AND TREE PROTECTION FENCE SHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL
REFERENCE ONLY. PERIMETER PROTECTION MUST BE AT LEAST 3' FROM TOE OF
ADJACENT SLOPE TO ALLOW ROOM FOR ACCESS AND MAINTENANCE.
GENERAL NOTES
SKIMMER ; SEE EROSION CONTROL
DETAILS FOR SIZINGSK
THE EXCHANGEPREPARED FORBP NODA, LLCSITE PLANC3-1Know what's
RNORTHSITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NOTES
1. SEE "GENERAL NOTES" SHEET FOR SITE GENERAL NOTES AND ZONING NOTES.
2. SEE "EXISTING CONDITIONS" FOR COMPLETE BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION, ADJOINING
PROPERTIES, ZONING AND USE.
3. ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE MEASURED FROM THE FACE OF CURB TO FACE OF
CURB, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
4. ALL RADII SHALL BE 3 FEET UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN.
5. DIMENSIONS TO THE BUILDING ARE MEASURED TO THE EXTERIOR OF THE
FOUNDATION WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN.
6. BEARINGS, DIMENSIONS AND EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN FOR REFERENCE. REFER TO
RECORDED PLATS AND SURVEYS FOR ADDITIONAL PROPERTY INFORMATION.
7. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS
AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULES, SLOPE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, EXIT PORCHES, TRUCK
DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE
LOCATIONS.
8. ALL ON-SITE STRIPING IS TO BE PAINTED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL STRIPING IN
PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY TO BE THERMOPLASTIC STRIPING.
9. THE SITE WILL BE FULLY COMPLIANT WITH THE ADA ACCESSIBILITY CODES UNLESS
AND EXCEPT IN AREAS WHERE AN APPROVED STATEMENT FROM A SITE ENGINEER,
SURVEYOR, OR ARCHITECT VERIFIES THAT SITE CONDITIONS EXIST WHERE THE
TOPOGRAPHY OF THE SITE IS EXTREME AND ONLY ALTERNATE METHODS OF
COMPLIANCE ARE POSSIBLE.
10.TESTING OF MATERIALS REQUIRED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PAVING
IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE PERFORMED BY AN APPROVED AGENCY FOR TESTING
MATERIALS. THE TESTING LABORATORY AND THE PAYMENT OF SUCH TESTING
SERVICES SHALL BE MADE BY THE OWNER. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S
RESPONSIBILITY TO SHOW BY STANDARD TESTING PROCEDURES THAT THE WORK
CONSTRUCTED DOES MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPECIFICATIONS.
LEGEND FOR PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS
PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER
PROPOSED SPILL CURB
PROPOSED PARKING SPACES
PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT
PROPOSED STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT
PROPERTY LINE
CONCRETE PAD
STANDARD DUTY CONCRETE SIDEWALK
SITE DATA TABLE
PROJECT AREA:
TOTAL DISTURBED AREA 8.70 AC.
ZONING CODE SUMMARY
PARCEL TAX ID:08303150, 08303151, 08303152
STREET ADDRESS:2710 CHICK GODLEY ROAD
CHARLOTTE, NC 28206
ZONING:TOD-M(CD) PER REZONING PETITION
2014-100
PROPOSED USE:MULTI-FAMILY
BUILDING HEIGHT:VARIES
SETBACK REQUIREMENTS:
MATHESON AVENUE: 24' FROM BACK
OF CURB
CHICK GODLEY ROAD: 9' FROM BACK
OF CURB
PARKING SUMMARY
PARKING REQUIREMENTS:MAXIMUM 1.5 SPACES/UNIT
251 TOTAL UNITS, MAXIMUM 376
SPACES
PARKING REQUIRED:
STANDARD SPACES: MAXIMUM 376
SPACES
ADA SPACES: 6 STANDARD, 2 VAN
PARKING PROVIDED:STANDARD SPACES: 322 SPACES
ADA SPACES: 9 STANDARD, 6 VAN
TOTAL PARKING SPACES: 337 SPACES
BICYCLE PARKING SUMMARY
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED:
LONG TERM: NONE
SHORT TERM: 1 SPACE PER 20 UNITS;
13 TOTAL SPACES
TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED: 14 TOTAL SPACES
OPEN SPACE SUMMARY
PROJECT AREA:
*AREAS EXCLUDE EXISTING AND FUTURE RIGHT-OF-WAYS
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA :
(PAVEMENT, WALKS, AND
BUILDINGS):
EXISTING: 0 SF
PROPOSED: 266,152 SF / 6.11 AC.
OPEN SPACE REQUIRED: 0 SF / 0 AC.
PROVIDED: 332,905 SF / 7.64 AC.
SITE LEGEND
EXISTING WETLANDS
PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT
PROPOSED OPEN SPACE
PERMANENT GREENWAY EASEMENT LINE
PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT LINE
CHICK GODLEY RD
OPPORTUNITY LANE
CULLMAN AVE
THE EXCHANGEPREPARED FORBP NODA, LLCROADWAY PROFILESC3-2Know what's
R
Know what's
R
SECTION A-A'
CHICK GODLEY ROAD
SCALE: NTS
SECTION B-B'
OPPORTUNITY LANE
SCALE: NTS
SECTION C-C'
CULLMAN AVE
SCALE: NTS
(MODIFIED LOCAL RESIDENTIAL WIDE STREET - CLDSM STANDARD NO. U-03C)
(MODIFIED LOCAL RESIDENTIAL WIDE STREET - CLDSM STANDARD NO. U-03C)
(MODIFIED LOCAL RESIDENTIAL WIDE STREET - CLDSM STANDARD NO. U-03C)THE EXCHANGEPREPARED FORBP NODA, LLCTYPICAL SECTIONSC3-3
SECTION D-D'
CULLMAN AVE
SCALE: NTS
(MODIFIED LOCAL RESIDENTIAL WIDE STREET - CLDSM STANDARD NO. U-03C)
THE EXCHANGEPREPARED FORBP NODA, LLCGRADING ANDDRAINAGE PLANC4-1Know what's
RNORTHGRADING NOTESGRADING LEGEND
PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR
PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR
PROPOSED ELEVATION
PROPOSED STORM PIPE
EXISTING STORM PIPE
PROPOSED ELEVATION - TOP OF WALL
PROPOSED SPILL CURB
PROPOSED ELEVATION - BOTTOM OF WALL
PROPOSED RETAINING WALL
PROPOSED ELEVATION - MATCH EXISTING
STORM DRAINAGE ABBREVIATION LIST
PROPOSED ELEVATION - END OF WALL