Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout410014_Inspection_20200109ROY COOPER Governor MICHAEL S. REGAN Secretary LINDA CULPEPPER Director George Teague Reedy Fork Farm 7092 Sockwell Rd Elon, NC 27244 NORTH CAROLINA Environmental Quality January 9, 2020 SUBJECT: Annual Compliance Inspection Permit AWC410014 Dear Mr. Teague, An annual Compliance Inspection of the subject permit was conducted on December 19, 2019. A copy of the inspection report is included for your records and review. Please take note of the following comments from the inspection and take action as needed: 1. Calibration of your equipment was completed in 2019. It will be due again in 2021. 2. Soils analysis had been taken but results were not available to review by the inspection date. Soils analysis will be due again in 2022. 3. While records of waste application were tracked on the IRR-1 form, the IRR-2 had not been completed due to technical issues with the digital file. Please update your IRR-2 forms now that the correct form has been provided. 4. Reminder to include crop yields of anything harvested with waste application records. Yields were provided during inspection. 5. Reminder to keep your own stocking records now that you are no longer using DHI. 6. A copy of your Certificate of Coverage for the renewed General Permit is enclosed. Please keep this with your records as required. Be aware that a request for waste storage pond volume calculations was requested (highlighted). Thank you for your time during the inspection. Please contact me at 336-776-9705 or rebecca.chandler@ncdenr.gov if you have any questions regarding this inspection. Sincerely, DocuSigned by: �C�-- AB94CAC558544E9... Rebecca D. Chandler Environmental Specialist II NCDEQ-Division of Water Resources Winston-Salem Regional Office encl. D E Q�p North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources Winston-Salem Regional Office 1450 West Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300 I Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27105 NORTH CAROLINA o•o•°"•mme""­WMMKV /� 336.776.9800 Division of Water Resources ❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation ❑ Other Agency Facility Number: 410014 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Date of Visit: 12/19/2019 Entry Time Farm Name: Reedy Fork Farm Owner: George Y Teague Mailing Address: 7092 Sockwell Rd Physical Address: 7092 Sockwell Rd Facility Status: Active Permit: AWC410014 ❑ Denied Access Inactive Or Closed Date: County: Guilford Region: Winston-Salem 10:00 am Exit Time: 11:00 am Incident #: Owner Email: gyteague@gmail.com Phone: 336-449-4888 Elon College NC 272449607 Elon College NC 27244 Facility Status: 0Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator: Location of Farm: Latitude: 36' 10' 23" Longitude: 79' 33' 28" From WSRO: 1-40 east to GSO. North on NC Hwy 61. Right onto Sockwell Road. Farm on right at intersection of Sockwell and Baldwin Roads. Question Areas: Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat Waste Application Records and Documents Other Issues Certified Operator: George Y Teague Operator Certification Number: 21329 Secondary OIC(s): On -Site Representative(s): Name Title Phone 24 hour contact name George Teague 336-449-4883 On -site representative George Teague 336-449-4883 Primary Inspector: Rebecca D Chandler Docusigned by: Phone: 336-776-9705 Inspector Signature:— Date: 1/9/2020 Secondary Inspector(s): AB94CAC558544E9... Inspection Summary: 24. Calibration completed 8/29/2019, due again 2021 21. Soils have been taken, review results next inspection 21. Missing IRR-2s because of broken link, all applications included on IRR-1, no concern for over application, but please fill IRR-2s out once form is provided by DWR. 21. Reminder to keep own record of stocking since no longer using DHI. 21. Reminder for crop yields if corn silage is cut again. Provided during inspection. 18/ton ac corn DWR check permit renewal and send COC again for records. Page 1 of 5 Permit: AWC410014 Owner: George Y Teague Facility Number: 410014 Inspection Date: 12/19/19 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Regulated Operations Design Capacity Current promotions Cattle Cattle - Milk Cow 200 I 95 Total Design Capacity: 200 Total SSLW: 280,000 Waste Structures Effective Built Closed Designated Observed Type Identifier Date Date Date Freeboard Freeboard Waste Pond WSP 1 MILK 01/01/2005 01/01/1987 26.40 36.00 Waste Pond WSP 2 FREESTALL 01/01/2005 01/01/1996 31.40 36.00 Page 2 of 5 Permit: AWC410014 Owner: George Y Teague Facility Number: 410014 Inspection Date: 12/19/19 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine Discharges & Stream Impacts Yes No NA NE 1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation? ❑ MEIEI Discharge originated at: Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other ❑ a. Was conveyance man-made? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)? d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ) ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters of the ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ State other than from a discharge? Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment Yes No NA NE 4. Is storage capacity less than adequate? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard? ❑ 5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)? 6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a ❑ MEI ❑ waste management or closure plan? 7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ MEI ❑ 8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks) 9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ maintenance or improvement? Waste Application Yes No NA NE 10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ maintenance or improvement? 11. Is there evidence of incorrect application? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Excessive Ponding? ❑ Hydraulic Overload? ❑ Frozen Ground? ❑ Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)? ❑ PAN? ❑ Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.? ❑ Total Phosphorus? ❑ Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil? ❑ Outside of acceptable crop window? ❑ Evidence of wind drift? ❑ Application outside of application area? ❑ Crop Type 1 Corn (Silage) Page 3 of 5 Permit: AWC410014 Owner: George Y Teague Inspection Date: 12/19/19 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Facility Number: Reason for Visit: 410014 Routine Waste Application Yes No NA NE Crop Type 2 Fescue (Pasture) Crop Type 3 Crop Type 4 Crop Type 5 Crop Type 6 Soil Type 1 Soil Type 2 Soil Type 3 Soil Type 4 Soil Type 5 Soil Type 6 14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Management Plan(CAWMP)? 15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ determination? 17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Records and Documents Yes No NA NE 19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. WUP? ❑ Checklists? ❑ Design? ❑ Maps? ❑ Lease Agreements? ❑ Other? ❑ If Other, please specify 21. Does record keeping need improvement? ❑ ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Waste Application? ❑ Weekly Freeboard? ❑ Waste Analysis? ❑ Soil analysis? ❑ Waste Transfers? ❑ Weather code? ❑ Rainfall? ❑ Stocking? ❑ Crop yields? ❑ Page 4 of 5 Permit: AWC410014 Owner: George Y Teague Facility Number: Inspection Date: 12/19/19 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: 410014 Routine Records and Documents Yes No NA NE 120 Minute inspections? ❑ Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey ❑ 22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ (NPDES only)? 24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ appropriate box(es) below: Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels ❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon ❑ List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance: 26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ ❑ ❑ 27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification? ❑ ❑ ❑ Other Issues Yes No NA NE 28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates? 29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes, ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately. 30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application) 31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ If yes, check the appropriate box below. Application Field ❑ Lagoon / Storage Pond ❑ Other ❑ If Other, please specify 32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ CAW M P? 33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ 34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency? ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ Page 5 of 5