HomeMy WebLinkAbout410014_Inspection_20200109ROY COOPER
Governor
MICHAEL S. REGAN
Secretary
LINDA CULPEPPER
Director
George Teague
Reedy Fork Farm
7092 Sockwell Rd
Elon, NC 27244
NORTH CAROLINA
Environmental Quality
January 9, 2020
SUBJECT: Annual Compliance Inspection
Permit AWC410014
Dear Mr. Teague,
An annual Compliance Inspection of the subject permit was conducted on December 19, 2019. A copy of
the inspection report is included for your records and review. Please take note of the following comments
from the inspection and take action as needed:
1. Calibration of your equipment was completed in 2019. It will be due again in 2021.
2. Soils analysis had been taken but results were not available to review by the inspection date. Soils
analysis will be due again in 2022.
3. While records of waste application were tracked on the IRR-1 form, the IRR-2 had not been
completed due to technical issues with the digital file. Please update your IRR-2 forms now that
the correct form has been provided.
4. Reminder to include crop yields of anything harvested with waste application records. Yields were
provided during inspection.
5. Reminder to keep your own stocking records now that you are no longer using DHI.
6. A copy of your Certificate of Coverage for the renewed General Permit is enclosed. Please keep
this with your records as required. Be aware that a request for waste storage pond volume
calculations was requested (highlighted).
Thank you for your time during the inspection. Please contact me at 336-776-9705 or
rebecca.chandler@ncdenr.gov if you have any questions regarding this inspection.
Sincerely,
DocuSigned by:
�C�--
AB94CAC558544E9...
Rebecca D. Chandler
Environmental Specialist II
NCDEQ-Division of Water Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office
encl.
D E Q�p North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality I Division of Water Resources
Winston-Salem Regional Office 1450 West Hanes Mill Road, Suite 300 I Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27105
NORTH CAROLINA
o•o•°"•mme""WMMKV /� 336.776.9800
Division of Water Resources
❑ Division of Soil and Water Conservation
❑ Other Agency
Facility Number: 410014
Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit: Routine
Date of Visit: 12/19/2019 Entry Time
Farm Name: Reedy Fork Farm
Owner: George Y Teague
Mailing Address: 7092 Sockwell Rd
Physical Address: 7092 Sockwell Rd
Facility Status: Active
Permit: AWC410014 ❑ Denied Access
Inactive Or Closed Date:
County: Guilford Region: Winston-Salem
10:00 am Exit Time: 11:00 am Incident #:
Owner Email: gyteague@gmail.com
Phone: 336-449-4888
Elon College NC 272449607
Elon College NC 27244
Facility Status: 0Compliant ❑ Not Compliant Integrator:
Location of Farm: Latitude:
36' 10' 23" Longitude:
79' 33' 28"
From WSRO: 1-40 east to GSO. North on NC Hwy 61. Right onto Sockwell Road. Farm on right at intersection of Sockwell and
Baldwin Roads.
Question Areas:
Dischrge & Stream Impacts Waste Col, Stor, & Treat
Waste Application
Records and Documents Other Issues
Certified Operator: George Y Teague
Operator Certification Number:
21329
Secondary OIC(s):
On -Site Representative(s): Name Title
Phone
24 hour contact name George Teague
336-449-4883
On -site representative George Teague
336-449-4883
Primary Inspector: Rebecca D Chandler Docusigned by:
Phone:
336-776-9705
Inspector Signature:—
Date:
1/9/2020
Secondary Inspector(s): AB94CAC558544E9...
Inspection Summary:
24. Calibration completed 8/29/2019, due again 2021
21. Soils have been taken, review results next inspection
21. Missing IRR-2s because of broken link, all applications included on IRR-1, no concern for over application, but please fill
IRR-2s out once form is provided by DWR.
21. Reminder to keep own record of stocking since no longer using DHI.
21. Reminder for crop yields if corn silage is cut again. Provided during inspection.
18/ton ac corn
DWR check permit renewal and send COC again for records.
Page 1 of 5
Permit: AWC410014 Owner: George Y Teague Facility Number: 410014
Inspection Date: 12/19/19 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit: Routine
Regulated Operations
Design Capacity
Current promotions
Cattle
Cattle - Milk Cow 200 I 95
Total Design Capacity: 200
Total SSLW: 280,000
Waste Structures
Effective Built Closed Designated Observed
Type Identifier Date Date Date Freeboard Freeboard
Waste Pond
WSP 1 MILK
01/01/2005
01/01/1987
26.40
36.00
Waste Pond
WSP 2 FREESTALL
01/01/2005
01/01/1996
31.40
36.00
Page 2 of 5
Permit: AWC410014 Owner: George Y Teague
Facility Number:
410014
Inspection Date: 12/19/19 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Reason for Visit:
Routine
Discharges & Stream Impacts
Yes
No NA NE
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation?
❑
MEIEI
Discharge originated at:
Structure
❑
Application Field
❑
Other
❑
a. Was conveyance man-made?
❑
0 ❑
❑
b. Did discharge reach Waters of the State? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d. Does discharge bypass the waste management system? (if yes, notify DWQ)
❑
0 ❑
❑
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation?
❑
0 ❑
❑
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to Waters
of the ❑
0 ❑
❑
State other than from a discharge?
Waste Collection, Storage & Treatment
Yes
No NA NE
4. Is storage capacity less than adequate?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, is waste level into structural freeboard?
❑
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed (Le./ large
❑
0 ❑
❑
trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)?
6. Are there structures on -site that are not properly addressed and/or managed through a
❑
MEI
❑
waste management or closure plan?
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement?
❑
MEI
❑
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? (Not applicable
❑
0 ❑
❑
to roofed pits, dry stacks and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require
❑
0 ❑
❑
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
Yes No NA NE
10. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect application?
❑ 0 ❑ ❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Excessive Ponding?
❑
Hydraulic Overload?
❑
Frozen Ground?
❑
Heavy metals (Cu, Zn, etc)?
❑
PAN?
❑
Is PAN > 10%/10 lbs.?
❑
Total Phosphorus?
❑
Failure to incorporate manure/sludge into bare soil?
❑
Outside of acceptable crop window?
❑
Evidence of wind drift?
❑
Application outside of application area?
❑
Crop Type 1
Corn (Silage)
Page 3 of 5
Permit: AWC410014 Owner: George Y Teague
Inspection Date: 12/19/19 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection
Facility Number:
Reason for Visit:
410014
Routine
Waste Application
Yes
No NA NE
Crop Type 2
Fescue (Pasture)
Crop Type 3
Crop Type 4
Crop Type 5
Crop Type 6
Soil Type 1
Soil Type 2
Soil Type 3
Soil Type 4
Soil Type 5
Soil Type 6
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the Certified Animal Waste
❑
0 ❑
❑
Management Plan(CAWMP)?
15. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement?
❑
0 ❑
❑
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable acre
❑
0 ❑
❑
determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
❑
0 ❑
❑
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA NE
19. Did the facility fail to have Certificate of Coverage and Permit readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
WUP?
❑
Checklists?
❑
Design?
❑
Maps?
❑
Lease Agreements?
❑
Other?
❑
If Other, please specify
21. Does record keeping need improvement?
❑
❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Waste Application?
❑
Weekly Freeboard?
❑
Waste Analysis?
❑
Soil analysis?
❑
Waste Transfers?
❑
Weather code?
❑
Rainfall?
❑
Stocking?
❑
Crop yields?
❑
Page 4 of 5
Permit: AWC410014 Owner: George Y Teague Facility Number:
Inspection Date: 12/19/19 Inspection Type: Compliance Inspection Reason for Visit:
410014
Routine
Records and Documents
Yes
No NA NE
120 Minute inspections?
❑
Monthly and 1" Rainfall Inspections
❑
Sludge Survey
❑
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑
0 ❑
❑
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain a rainbreaker on irrigation equipment
❑
❑ 0
❑
(NPDES only)?
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check the
❑
❑ 0
❑
appropriate box(es) below:
Failure to complete annual sludge survey
❑
Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑
Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
❑
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail to provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge?
❑
❑
❑
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorous loss assessment (PLAT) certification?
❑
❑
❑
Other Issues
Yes
No NA NE
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals within 24 hours and/or document
❑
0 ❑
❑
and report mortality rates that exceed normal rates?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern? If yes,
❑
0 ❑
❑
contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify regional DWQ of emergency situations as required by Permit?
❑
0 ❑
❑
(i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility?
❑
0 ❑
❑
If yes, check the appropriate box below.
Application Field
❑
Lagoon / Storage Pond
❑
Other
❑
If Other, please specify
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the Permit or
❑
0 ❑
❑
CAW M P?
33. Did the Reviewer/Inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with on -site representative?
❑
0 ❑
❑
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by same agency?
❑
0 ❑
❑
Page 5 of 5