20040994 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_20040618

O?0 W AT ?qQG
O '<
Michael F. Easley, Governor
William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
August 17, 2004
Nathan Rosen
450 Fern Lane
King of Prussia, PA, 19406
Alan W. Klimek, P,E. Director
Division of Water Quality
DWQ Project # 04-0994
Dare County
Subject Property: Lot 3, Block A, C.H. Fulcher Tract, Adjacent to NC 12, Frisco, NC
Approval of 401 Water Quality Certification (GC3351) with Additional Conditions
Dear Mr. Rosen:
You have our approval, in accordance with the attached conditions, to place fill material within or
otherwise impact 0.023 acres of waters to driveway to access your residential property as described in
your application received by the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) Wetlands/401 Unit on June 18, 2004.
After reviewing your application, we have determined that the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) General
Water Quality Certification Number 3351 covers these water impacts. This Certification allows you to
General Permit No. 198000291 when issued by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). In addition,
you should get or otherwise comply with any other federal, state and local requirements before you go
ahead with your project including (but not limited to) erosion and sediment control regulations and
CAMA. Also, this approval to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct impacts to waters
as depicted in your application shall expire upon expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
This approval is for the purpose and design that you described in your application. If you change your
project, you must notify us and you may be required to send us a new application. If the property is sold,
the new owner must be given a copy of this Certification and approval letter and is thereby responsible for
complying with all conditions. If total fills for this project (now or in the future) exceed one acre of
wetland or 150 linear feet of stream, compensatory mitigation may be required as described in 15A
NCAC 21-1.0506 (h). This approval requires you to follow the conditions listed in the attached
certification and any additional conditions listed below.
The Additional Conditions of the Certification are:
1. Impacts Approved
The following impacts are hereby approved as long as all of the other specific and general
conditions of this Certification (or Isolated Wetland Permit) are met. No other impacts are
approved including incidental impacts:
Amount Approved
(Units) Plan Location or Reference
Stream (feet)
404/LAMA Wetlands 0.023 (acres) DCM field report
Waters (acres)
Buffers (square ft.)
Wetlands Certification Unit
I Mail Service Center, Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-1650
Crabtree Boulevard, Suite 250, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604
1: 919-733-1786 / FAX [phone] / Internet: http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/ncwetlands
Nor hCaro ma
Naturally
sl Opportunity/Affirmative Action Employer- 509/6 Recycled/100/6 Post Consumer Paper
Mr. Nathan Rosen
Page 2 of 2
August 17, 2004
2. Certificate of Completion
Upon completion of all work approved within the 401 Water Quality Certification or applicable
Buffer Rules, and any subsequent modifications, the applicant is required to return the attached
certificate of completion to the 401/Wetlands Unit, North Carolina Division of Water Quality,
1650 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC, 27699-1650.
3. Water Quality Certification
The proposed project must comply with all of the conditions of General Water Quality
Certification (GC) 3351.
Violations of any condition herein set forth may result in revocation of this Certification and may result in
criminal and/or civil penalties. The authorization to proceed with your proposed impacts or to conduct
impacts to waters as depicted in your application and as authorized by this Certification, shall expire upon
expiration of the 404 or CAMA Permit.
If you do not accept any of the conditions of this Certification (associated with the approved water
impacts), you may ask for an adjudicatory hearing. You must act within 60 days of the date that you
receive this letter. To ask for a hearing, send a written petition, which conforms to Chapter 150B of the
North Carolina General Statutes to the Office of Administrative\'Hearings, 6714 Mail Service Center,
Raleigh, N.C. 27699-6714. This certification and its conditions \hre final and binding unless you ask for a
hearing.
This letter completes the review of the Division of Water Quality under Section 401 of the Clean Water
Act. If you have any questions, please telephone Cyndi Karoly in the Central Office in Raleigh at 919-
733-9721 or Tom Steffens in the DWQ Washington Regional Office at 252-946-6481.
Sincerely,
Alan W. Klimek, P.E.
//I", AWKlcbk
Enclosures: GC 3351
Certification of Completion
cc: Gary Price
Doug Huggett, DCM
USACE Washington Regulatory Field Office
DWQ Washington Regional Office
File Copy
Central Files
Filename: 040994Rosen(Dare)401
NCDENR
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources
Division of Coastal Management
Michael F. Easley, Governor Charles S. Jones, Director William G. Ross Jr., Secretary
June 16, 2004
MEMORANDUM: 0409),4 WETLANDS 1401 G
TO: Mr. John R. Dorney RQUP
Environmental Biological Supervisor JUN 1 R 2004
Division of Water Quality WA
TE, ? QUgLiTySECT10N
FROM: Doug Huggett
Major Permits Processing Coordinator
SUBJECT: CAMA/DREDGE & FILL Permit Application Review
Applicant: Nathan Rosen
Project Location: Lot 3, Block A, C. H. Fulcher Tract, Adjacent NC 12, Frisco, NC
Proposed Project: Driveway/bridge approach and bridge to provide access to residence
Please indicate below your agency's position or viewpoint on the proposed project and return this
form by July 6, 2004. If you have any questions regarding the proposed project, please contact
Dennis Hawthorn at [phone]. When appropriate, in-depth comments with supporting data
are requested.
REPLY: This agency has no objection to the project as proposed.
This agency has no comment on the proposed project.
This agency approves of the project only if the recommended changes are
incorporated. See attached.
This agency objects to the project for reasons described in the attached
comments.
SIGNED DATE
1367 U.S. 17 South, Elizabeth City, North Carolina 27909
Phone: [phone] \ FAX: [phone] \ Internet: www.nccoastalmanagement.net
An Equal Opportunity \ Affirmative Action Employer - 30% Recycled by Fiber Weight

FeE DGM %
(14300 1601 435100093 1625 62531 DWQ %
(24300 1502 435100095 2341

e
Development Typ
1, private, non.commercial
nt that does not Involve
$250 100%(S250) 0°ib (So)
developme
the ing or excavation of any

wetlands lands or open
e water areas:
II. Public or commercial development 100% (5400) 0% (SO)
that does not involve the filling or 5400
excavation of any wetlands or open
water areas:
Ill. For development that involves the
filling and/or excavation of up to 1
acre of wetands and/or open water
areas, determine if A, S. C, or D
below applies:
III(A). For Private, non.commercial
if General water Quality
nt
5250 100%(5250) 0% (SO)
,
developme
Certification No.3301 (see attached)
can be applied:
111((3): For public or commercial
If Genera( water Quality
ent
5400 100%(S400) 0% (SO)
,
developm
Certification No.3301 (see attached)
can be applied:
111(C). If General Water Quality
Certification 3301 (see
t DCM staff attached)

ould be app

0%(S240)

40% (SifiO)
c
determined that additional review and $400
written DWQ concurrence is needed
because of concerns related to water
quality or aquatic life: _
III(D). 1I General 1h'atar Quality 5400 60%(S240) 40% (5160)
Certification No. 3301 (see attached) I
can not be applied:
IV. For development that involves 60% (5285) 40% (5190)
the filling and/or excavation of more 5475
than one acre of wetlands and/or
open water areas:
Personal Account Information Redacted
DIVISION OF COASTAL MANAGEMENT
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT
0440994
APPLICANT'S NAME: Nathan Rosen
2. LOCATION OF PROJECT SITE: Lot 3, Block A, C. H. Fulcher Tract, Adjacent to NC 12 and
a man-made ditch that connects to the Pamlico Sound, in Frisco, Dare County
Photo Index - 2000: 172-2018 1995: 172-1752 (P-13)
State Plane Coordinates, X: 301010000;Y: 563400 GPS C052014A
3. INVESTIGATION TYPE: CAMA / D & F
4. INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURE: Dates of Site Visit - March 17 & April 20, 2004
Was Applicant Present - yes / no
5. PROCESSING PROCEDURE: Application Received Complete -April 2, 2004
Office - Elizabeth City
6. SITE DESCRIPTION:
(A) Local Land Use Plan - Dare County
Land Classification From LUP - Conservation
(B) AEC(s) Involved: Estuarine Waters, Public Trust Area, Estuarine Shoreline, Coastal
Wetlands
(C) Water Dependent: Yes
(D) Intended Use: Private
(E) Wastewater Treatment: Existing - none; Planned - none
(F) Type of Structures: Existing - vacant lot that is divided by a man-made ditch
Planned - 141 feet by 15 feet driveway/bridge approach with 43 feet by 15 feet bridge
with bridge abutment bulkhead stabilization
(G) Estimated Annual Rate of Erosion: none
Source - Applicant
7. HABITAT IMPACT DESCRIPTION: [AREA]
EXCAVATED FILLED SHADING
(A) Vegetated Wetlands 485 sq. ft. 60 sq. ft.
(B) Estuarine Waters 450 sq. ft.
(C) Upland 1655 sq. ft.
(D) Total Area Disturbed:
(E) Primary Nursery Area
(F) Water Classification:
2650 sq. ft. (0.061 acres)
No
SA; Open: no
8. PROJECT SUMMARY: This project involves the construction of a driveway/bridge approach 141
feet long by 15 feet wide, with a43 feet long by 15 feet wide bridge across a man-made ditch to
provide private access to a residential high-ground building site.
FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT: Nathan Rosen, Dare County
Page 2
PROJECT SETTING
This project is proposed on property owned by Elizabeth E. Lauer. Nathan and Susan Rosen of 450
Fern Lane, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, have entered into a contract with Ms. Lauer to purchase
this parcel provided that the proposed development can be permitted so that the high ground portion
of the property can be accessible. The site is located along NC 12 in Frisco, Dare County, and is
described as Lot 3, Block A of the C. H. Fulcher Tract.
The adjacent riparian properties are owned by Bennie J. Morris to the west and Jennie G. Sharp to the
east. The shorelines of these properties have not been stabilized with any hardened structures and a
coastal wetland marsh fringe is present near the Normal Water Level (NWL) of the Sharp property.
The site consists of a 1.23-acre lot with approximately 92 feet of shoreline along the Pamlico Sound.
The lot extends from NC 12 north to the Pamlico Sound and is bisected by a small man-made
canal/ditch that eventually connects to the Pamlico Sound to the northeast and northwest. The portion
of the ditch, which bisects this property, is not navigable except during high wind tides. A wooden
bridge crosses this ditch on a nearby property to the northeast and is visible from the proposal site.
The shoreline of this ditch is vegetated with Spartina alterniflora, Spartina patens, and Distichlis
spicata, as well as other wetland grasses and shrubs, including Borrichia frutescens, Baccharis
halimifolia, and Iva frutescens. The ditch is approximately 25 to 30 feet in width and no more than 1
foot in depth at its deepest portion. According to the permit application, the site is approximately 3.5-
feet above the NWL. The topsoils of this property are hydric-organic type soils located within the first
8 to10 inches of the ground level, and are present on the entire front portion of the lot. Most of the
front portion of the lot is vegetated in U.S. Army Corp of Engineer (USACOE) 404 wetland plant
species. No fish species were observed during the site visits at this site in the ditch area. The access
driveway directly to the west has a culvert and this structure has collapsed overtime, allowing little or
no water exchange to the canal/ditch portion to the west.
The NC Marine Fisheries and Wildlife Resources Commission classify the waters of the Pamlico
Sound and waters that directly connect to the Sound as Coastal Waters. The Coastal Resources
Commission (CRC) has designated these waters as an Area of Environmental Concern, and this
includes Estuarine Waters and Public Trust Area waters. The CRC has also designated this shoreline
as Estuarine Shoreline, and this includes a 30-feet wide Coastal Shoreline Buffer. Spartina
alterniflora, Spartina patens, and Distichlis spicata wetland marsh areas that receive occasional
Estuarine Water flooding are also designated as Coastal Wetlands by the CRC.

A preliminary review of archaeological site data for this portion of Hatteras Island indicates that there
are cultural resource sites in the vicinity of this project.
` FIELD INVESTIGATION REPORT: Nathan Rosen, Dare County
Page 3
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The applicant proposes to construct a 15 feet wide by 53 feet long bridge for private use to provide
access to a residential high ground building site adjacent to the Pamlico Sound on Lot 3. The
structure will be pile supported, most likely constructed from treated wood. A bulkhead retaining wall
will be placed at each bridge abutment to provide stabilization and bridge support. The bridge
structure will be a minimum of 3 feet above the wetland substrate to be crossed, and will include less
than 25 square feet of coastal wetland fill. This proposal also includes the construction of a 141 feet
by 15 feet fill area to provide a driveway approach to the bridge. This approach will result in the filling
of approximately 90 square feet of Coastal Wetlands and 370 square feet of 404 type vegetated
wetlands. It is anticipated that other work requiring a CAMA Permit, by virtue of its location within the
Estuarine Shoreline AEC, will be applied for at a later time.
ANTICIPATED IMPACTS
The proposed bridge will result in the shading of 60 square feet of Coastal Wetlands, and the bridge
approach/driveway will result in the filling of less than 500 square feet of wetlands, mostly 404 type
wetlands. The bridge structure over the canal will result in the shading of 450 square feet of Estuarine
and Public Trust Area Waters. Navigation in this canal will be no more limited after this project than
before:
During the construction of the proposed structure, some minor turbidity associated with the installation
of bridge pilings may occur. The proposed structure will provide vehicular access to the waterfront
portion of Lot 1.
An inspection of mapping data on cultural resources revealed that archaeological, or cultural resource
findings had been recorded on the available maps in the vicinity of this project. It is important to note
that these maps have not been updated in at least 10 years, and Hatteras Island has a rich heritage in
cultural resources. The discovery of additional cultural or historical resources is possible.
Submitted by: Dennis W. Hawthorn
Revised: June 14, 2004
Form DCM-W-1 RECEIVED
APR 0 2 2004
APPLICATIONCOASTAL N4ANAGEMENT
ELIZABETH CITY
(To be completed by all applicants)
1. APPLICANT
a. Landowner:
t^!1N FACT
Name Tad L02LIf AIMMr,
Address
city K111(;a ff RRY.. AIX State PQ
Zip 19'Vi9b Day Phone ?
Fax
b. Authorized Agent:
Name «R % P/?/C,-F
Address ' P, D, BdX -5 /
City 411d N State &
Zip 2 7 9 /5- Day Phone 252" -30-2-,t- . ` 7
Fax 252- ?I°/S-6 3`f7
c. Project name (if any) IVIA -
NOTE: Permit will be issued in name of landm?vner(s), and/or
project name.
2. LOCATION OF PROPOSED
PROJECT
a. County 8496
b. City, town,. community or landmark
f/ZlS'LO
c. Street address or secondary road number
d. Is proposed work within city limits or planning
jurisdiction? _Z Yes No
e. Name of body of water nearest project (e.g. river,
creek, sound, bay) FWAM160 '.1941 ID
3. DESCRIP'T'ION AND PLANNED USE
OF PROPOSED PROJECT
a. List all development activities you propose (e.g.
building a home, motel, marina, bulkhead, pier, and
excavation and/or filling activities.
Sate D G J! ec. R 45 74iAiit AJ6 C1/4 G C,
b. Is the proposed activity maintenance of an existing
project, new work, or both? _ .NEW
c. Will the project be for public, private or commercial
use? jPR1l/A TE -
d. Give a brief description of purpose, use, methods of
construction and daily operations of proposed
project. If more space is needed, please attach
additional pages.
AZZ*iM Y B911,0%/V?6T? '
_? lYIfT?U I M?CI(,?dV? L
? ?YIlJNC/?IL L/_
Revised 03/95 •
Form DCM-MP-1
4. LAND AND WATER
CHARACTERISTICS
a. Size of entire tract
b. Size of individual lot(s) NIA
c. Approximate elevation of tract above MHW or
NWL 3, s,
d. Soil type(s) and texture(s) of tract
SM2
e. Vesetation on tract D16F?V6VS
UPEAVD ? Wt Z RIB
f. Man-made features now on tract /V N&
g. What is the . CAMA Land Use Plan land
classification of the site? (Consult the local kind use pan.)
Conservation
Developed
Rural
h. How is the tract zpned by local government?
2f--5I0E/U7IA-L
b Z3 ACIDS
Transitional
Community
Other
m. Describe existing wastewater treatment facilities.
AIPA/C-
n. Describe location and type of discharges to waters
of the state. (For example, surface runoff, sanitary
wastewater, industrial/commercial effluent, "wash
down" and residential discharges.)
SUQFAM
o. Describe existing drinking water supply source.
691INTY
5. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In addition to the completed application form, the
following items must be submitted:
• A copy of the deed (with state application only) or
other instrument under which the applicant claims title
to the affected properties. If the applicant is not
claiming to be the owner of said property, then
forward a copy of the deed or other instrument under
which the owner claims title, plus written permission
from the owner to carry out the project.
i. Is the proposed project consistent with the applicable
zoning? ? Yes No
(Attach zoning compliance cert(ftcate, (f applicable)
j•
Has a professional
done for the tract?
If yes, by whom? .
archaeological assessment been
Yes No
k. Is the project located in a National Registered
Historic District or does it involve a National
Register listed or eligible property?
Yes No LINKNOWiV
1. Are there wetlands op the site? ?Yes No
Coastal (marsh) f Other
If yes, has a delineation been conducted? ?
(,4noch documentation, if available) DCN11/S L1.4w111,9.p e
(4100 DE41X1f 701V A77AG744-ED)
• An accurate, dated work plat (including plan view
and cross-sectional drawings) drawn to scale in black
ink on an 8 1/2" by 11 " white paper. (Refer to
Coastal Resources Commission Rule 7J.0203 for a
detailed description.)
Please note that original drawings are preferred and
only high quality copies will be accepted. Blue-line
prints or other larger plats are acceptable only if an
adequate number of quality copies are provided by
applicant. (Contact the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers regarding that agency's use of larger
drawings.) A site or location map is a part of plat
requirements and it must be sufficiently detailed to
guide agency personnel unfamiliar with the area to the
Form DCM-MP-1
RECEIVED
APR 0 2 20P4
site. Include highway or secondary road (SR)
numbers, landmarks, and the like.
• A Stormwater Certification, if one is necessary.
• A list of the names and complete addresses of the
adjacent waterfront (riparian) landowners and
signed return receipts as proof that such owners
have received a copy of the application and plats
by certified mail. Such landowners must be advised
that they have 30 days in which to submit comments
on the proposed project to the Division of Coastal
Management. Upon signing this form, the applicant
further certifies that such notice has been provided.
Name 13ENNIf Jr 1Y96fPISS
Address F D,BOX 96
PKI-769, NC, 7 7 ?J(6
Name ?5"ENN/F9 . S/mf P
Address Z/OD ROKENY 44E.
C11F,5,d P f-44 -i W. i Z 35Z.Ca
Name
Address
Phone
• A list of previous state or federal permits issued for
work on the project tract. Include permit numbers,
permittee, and issuing dates.
• A check for $250 made payable to the Department of
Environment, Health, and Natural Resources
(DEHNR) to cover the costs of processing the
application.
• A signed AEC hazard notice for projects in
oceanfront and inlet areas.
• A statement of compliance with the N.C.
Environmental Policy Act (N.C.G.S. 113A - 1 to
10) If the project involves the expenditure of public
funds or use 'of public lands, attach a statement
documenting compliance with the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act.
,r
COASTAL MANAGEMENT
6. CERTIFICATION AND PERMISSION
TO ENTER ON LAND
I understand that any permit issued in response to this
application will allow only the development described in
the application. The project will be subject to conditions
and restrictions contained in the permit.
I certify that to the best of my knowledge, the proposed
activity complies with the State of North Carolina's
approved Coastal Management Program and will be
conducted in a manner consistent with such program.
I certify that I am authorized to grant, and do in fact,
grant permission to representatives of state and federal
review agencies to enter on the aforementioned lands in
connection with evaluating information related to this
permit application and follow-up monitoring of the
project.
I further certify that the information provided in this
application is truthful to the best of my knowledge.
This is the ILZ# day of Feb, , f4ZX fX
Print Name CVA/? % Rl?l(e
Signature
Imidowner or nthori2ed Agent
Please indicate attachments pertaining to your proposed
project.
?DCM MP-2 Excavation and Fill Information
DCM MP-3 Upland Development
DCM MP-4 Structures Information
DCM MP-5 Bridges and Culverts
DCM MP-6 Marina Development
NOTE: Please sign and date each attachment In the
. space provided at the bottom of each form.
Revised 03/95
EXCAVATION
AND FILL
(Except bridges and culverts)
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA
Major Permit, Form DCM-MP-l. Be sure to complete
all other sections of the Joint Permit Application relate
to this proposed project.
Describe below the purpose of proposed excavation or
fill activities. All values to be given in feet.
RECEIVED
APR U 2 20'4
':;OASTAL I?IANAGEMEN7
kL lZABETH CITY
1. EXCAVATION N,1,q
a. Amount of material to be excavated below
MWW or MLW in cubic yards
b. Type of material to be excavated
Access
channel
(MLW) or (NWL)
Canal
Boat
basin
Boat
ramp
Rock
breakwater
Average Final
Existing Project
Length Width Depth Depth
Other
(Excluding
shoreline IB3 is 2 NIA NIA
stabilization)
C. Does the area to be excavated include coastal
wetlands (marsh), submerged aquatic vegetation
d. I-lighground excavation in cubic yards
2. DISPOSAL OF EXCAVATED
MATERIAL N14
a. Location of disposal area
b. Dimensions of disposal area
c. Do you claim title to disposal area?
Yes No
d. Will a disposal area be available for future
Maintenance? Yes No
If yes. where?
c. Does the disposal area include any coastal wetlands
(marsh), SAV's or other wetlands?
Yes No
f. Does the disposal include any area in water?
Yes No
3. SHORELINE STABILIZATION
A(1Q
a. Type of shoreline stabilization
X- Bulkhead . Riprap
b. Length___, /U1??f79 VrAo7 7W 7'
c. Average distance waterward of MI-IW o NW I,
t''
d. Maximum distance waterward of MHW or MLW
e. Shoreline erosion during preceding 12 months
UAI KNGO vjl j
(solace of inforneation)
f. Type of bulkhead or riprap material
INvo1D
g. Amount of rill in cubic yards to be placed below
water level
(1) Riprap /y/R
(2) Bulkhead backfill d
h. Type of fill material 5 a.,P?D
i. Source of fill material LI PG?F?J b
4. OTHER FILL ACTIVITIES
a. Will fill material be brought to site?
?Yes No
If yes,
(1) Amount of material to be placed in the
water D
(2) Dimensions of fill area
(3) Purpose of fill WNVEL4 4Y
1). Will fill material be placed in coastal wetlands
(mars ), SAVs or other wetlands?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Dimensions of fill area
q' Y:9 JA1h I D X Z9"
(2) Purpose of rill
.?4AlD
5. GENERAL
a. IIow will excavated material be kept on site
and erosion controlled?_ N/A c
b. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe, or hydraulic
dredge)? ZA-CLCIIDE'. D(1MR T/ZUGL'
c. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
to project site? Yes ji?_ No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts
/1!/1 T mAi ROS i=iU
Applicant or Project Name
Signature 4
Date
RECEIVED
APR 0 2 ?Pn!,
UASTAL I .IANAGENIENT
"I 17417FTH CITY

Form DCM-MP 5
BRIDGES AND
CULVERTS
Attach this form to Joint Application for CAMA Major
Permit, Form DCM-MP-1. Be sure to complete all
other sections of the Joint Application that relate to this
proposed project.
1. BRIDGES
a. Public Private A
b. Type of bridge (construction material)
W06 0
c. Water body to be crossed by bridge
MarvMAbV CA"AL.
d. Water depth at the proposed crossing at MLW or
NWL (o
e. Will proposed bridge replace an existing bridge?
Yes X No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing bridge
(2) Width of existing bridge
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing
bridge
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain)
f. Will proposed bridge replace an existing culvert(s)?
Yes c_1No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the MHW or NWL
RECEIVED
APR o z ?o??n
t.;OASTAL MANAGEMENT
ELIZABETH CITY
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain)
g. Length of proposed bridge y3
h. Width of proposed bridge 15'
i. Height of proposed bridge above wetlands
3'
j. Will the proposed bridge affect existing water flow?
Yes K' No
If yes, explain
k. Navigation clearance underneath proposed bridge
A/ZA (AEab Eum CAA44)
1. Will the proposed bridge affect navigation by
reducing or increasing the existing navigable
opening? Yes No
If yes, explain
D E,4 b CA)O O sc CAA)A
m. Will the proposed bridge cross wetlands containing
no navigable waters? x_ Yes No
If yes, explain
1J???J CW © C.4L
r- t> w1414 b6541
n. Have you contacted the U.S. Coast Guard
concerning their approval?
Yes X No
If yes, please provide record of their action.
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-S
2. CULVERTS N1,4
a. Water body in which culvert is to be placed
b. Number of culverts proposed
c. Type of culvert (construction material, style)
d. Will proposed culvert replace an existing bridge?
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of existing bridge
(2) Width of existing bridge
(3) Navigation clearance underneath existing
bridge
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing bridge be
removed? (Explain)
e. Will proposed culvert replace an existing culvert?
Yes No
if yes,
(1) Length of existing culvert
(2) Width of existing culvert
(3) Height of the top of the existing culvert above
the MHW or NWL
(4) Will all, or a part of, the existing culvert be
removed? (Explain)
f. Length of proposed culvert
g. Width of proposed culvert
h.' Height of the top of the proposed culvert above the
MHW or NWL
i. Will the proposed culvert affect existing water flow?
Yes No
if yes, explain
j. Will the proposed culvert affect existing navigation
potential? Yes No
If yes, explain
3. EXCAVATION AND FILL
a. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation below the MHW or NWL?
Yes No A/
if yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Depth of area to be excavated
(4) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards
b. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any excavation within: N!?
_ Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs _ Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards
c. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any highground excavation? WIA
Yes No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be excavated
(2) Width of area to be excavated
(3) Amount of material to be excavated in cubic
yards
d. If the placement of the bridge or culvert involves
any excavation, please complete the following: MIA
(1) Location of the spoil disposal area
(2) Dimensions of spoil disposal area
(3) Do you claim title to the disposal area?
Yes No
If no, attach a letter granting permission from
the owner.
Revised 03/95
Form DCM-MP-S
(4) Will the disposal area be available for future
maintenance? Yes No klft
(5) Does the disposal area include any coastal
wetlands (marsh), SAVs, or other wetlands?
Yes No
If yes, give dimensions if different from (2)
above.
(6) Does the disposal area include any area belowA//A-
the MHW or NWL? Yes No
If yes, give dimension if different from No. 2
above.
e. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed below
MHW or NWL? Yes X_ No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill
f. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed within:
,< Coastal Wetlands _ SAVs _ Other Wetlands
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled 9
(2) Width of area to be filled 1ST
(3) Purpose of fill 494! Z. CA-17'
g. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
result in any fill (other than excavated material
described in Item d. above) to be placed on
highground? Yes X _ No
If yes,
(1) Length of area to be filled
(2) Width of area to be filled
(3) Purpose of fill
4. GENERAL.
a.
Will the proposed project involve any mitigation?
Yes %o," No
If yes, explain in detail
b. Will the proposed project require the relocation of
any existing utility lines? Yes ? No
If yes, explain in detail
c. Will the proposed project require the construction of
any temporary detot}r structures?
Yes ?
If yes, explain in detail
d. Will the proposed project require any work
channels? Yes v-" No
If yes, complete Form DCM-MP-2
e. How will excavated or fill material be kept on site
and erosion controlled?
7E/!/19"&%- SILTTrge
f. What type of construction equipment will be used
(for example, dragline, backhoe or hydraulic
dredge)? B/aL'1 AM .1 Muiz-
g. Will wetlands be crossed in transporting equipment
to project site? Yes _;,e' No
If yes, explain steps that will be taken to lessen
environmental impacts.
h. Will the placement of the proposed bridge or culvert
require any shoreline stabilization?
Yes No iVIX
If yes, explain in detail
IVA711141V RtMAI
Applicant or Project Name
I-
Signature
Z//6Il y
Date
Revised 03/95
GARY PRICE
Environmental & Governmental Permitting
P.O. Box 591
Avon, NC 27915-0591
[phone], Fax [phone]
March 2, 2004
di.AR C 4 li:l(1l?
Mr. Dennis Hawthorne
NC DCM
1367 US 17 South
Elizabeth City, NC., 27909

Re: CAMA Major Permit Application for Mr. Nathan Rosen to Construct a
Driveway on Lot 3, Block A, C.H. Fulcher Tract, Frsico, NC
Dear Dennis,
Attached for your review is the referenced completed application. The applicant proposes
a driveway that impacts Coastal and 404 Wetlands. In order to get to the suitable building
area on this parcel, the applicant proposes to fill to create a driveway that complies with
Dare County minimum requirements for emergency vehicle access. The proposed
driveway is immediately adjacent to a similarly filled driveway access.
Before submitting this application, the adjacent property owner of lot 4 was contacted in
an effort to obtain an easement over the existing filled driveway for access to lot 3. The
adjacent property owner declined this proposal.
The driveway proposed is the minimum width (15') required by Dare County to allow
access for emergency vehicles and has been located on this parcel to have the least impact
on wetlands.
If you have any questions or need any additional information, please feel free to call.
Thanks You,
Gary Price
BUILDABLE
HIGHLAND
N AREA
HIGHLAND
12,614.32 sq ft
w E PROPOSED BRIDGE
15' X 43' ????
G?
?NW
10
? J
??` \ \\Z s fir" p
41-
l
WETLANE
a J -.1 9,392 sq ft
?r o
\ ?o \
0
` \o
lvl-
\ LEGEND
? EXISTING CONCRETE MONUME
O EXISTING IRON STAKE
O PK NAIL
® UTILITY POLE
\ FIRE HYDRANT
Q GEODETIC MONUMENT
® WATER METER
© PED-LOCK
V SET IRON STAKE
? CC
% E ` '?ie®
APR
,OASTALAIGEMENT
fm-1-17A FT CITY
1
o
T FENCE <*l
HIGHLAND '
2,817.32 sq ft
\ 68.00,
60, RA
? 5 750 ? W
N?GN
NC 12
BRIDGE MATERIALS: `tU
2"X 8" LAPPED DECKING RETAINING WALL MATERIALS:
DOUBLE 2"X 12" GIRDER STRINGERS PILES - 8"X 12' 40 0 40 80
TRIPLE 2"X 12" GIRDERS SHEETING - 2"X8"X12'
PILES 10" BUTT/ BURIED +12' BELOW WALERS - 6"X6"
EXISTING BOTTOM (5' O.C.) TIE BACK PILES - 8" X 8'
ALL TIMBER 2.5 CCA TREATED TIE RODS - 3/4" X 12'
ALL HARDWARE HD GALV. ALL HARDWARE HD GALV. PROPOSED GRADE PROPOSED 2:1
ALLTIMBER 2.5 CCATREATED MATCH EXISTING VEGETATED SLOPE
15, ADJACENT GRADE
6'0 SIL I FENCE
iii I ig I ! I I !!III 1 11 SG
ff
014
-EXISTING GROUND III Ill Ill ? ;l1lill, 1111, 11111111 !!1 !111 111 1111?111111 111111151,
PROPOSED RETAINING WALL EXISTING GROUND
u u RETAINING WALL SECTION SECTION B
SECTION A tits nts
III
PROPOSED DRIVEWAY PLAN FOR:
NATHAN
LOT 3, BLOCK A, C
REV. 04/01/04
DATE: 02/11/04 PLAN BY
ROSEN
H. FULCHER TRACT
27936
PRICE SHEET 2 OF 2
WETLAND & FILL AREAS : (South of canal)
COASTAL WETLAND - 2,605 sq ft
COASTAL WETLAND TO BE FILLED - 250 SQ FT
404 WETLAND - 9,392 sq ft
404 WETLAND TO BE FILLED - 2,544 sq ft
Note: See sheet 1 for other wetlands north of car

PAMLICO SOUND
Pq/qtjCO SOUND

\ ?\ LEGEND
\ D EXISTING CONCRETE MONUMENT IV O PKI TI G IRON STAKE
NAIL
® UTILITY POLE
\ S FIRE HYDRANT
\ ` p GEODETIC MONUMENT
® WATER METER
LOT 3 6 PEW OCK
\ 23 acres ? \? • SET IRON STAKE
t
\` `\ 53,760.88 sq ft \` \
..?-
Z' THISMEA RECEIVED
.` ` as NOT DEUNEATED
? APR 0 2 m04
"OASTAL •104 WETIAND UNE
ELIZAM13FTNAH CITY
? E
,, as ? ,, 4R P? `?
LOT 2 \'` \• ORS SN 2 _-,-A
\? \ /CWARP
?

-
REVISED 04/01/04
N?2H' AN
. ?4£ll1f6916
site
0
? , ` \
W01AND 1
9391.97 sq 9
?,A? Y ? 8?acoa ?
'00

? :nsr

100 0 100 200
SITE & LOCATION MAP FOR:
SHEET 1 OF 2
PLAN BY GARY PRICE
NATHAN ROSEN
LOT 3, BLOCK A, C.H. FULCHER TRACT
FRISCO, NC 27936
Township County State
HATTERAS DARE NORTH CAROLINA
Date File Number F.I.R.M. Zone Pin Number
02/11/04 AE 05 0516 13 23 0124
Scale FB/Pg Base Flood Elevation Zoning
11'=100' 7.00' S-1
Recorded Reference Community/Panel/Suffix Average Ground Elevatil
MB 2, PAGE 191 375348 0880E
`,,.? \` I, p1C12 AIDAOS?
N - a COMER O
` RED DRUM
`\? \ FLOUNDER
0
FRISCO, NC awEE??
,
` LOCATION SKETCH NOT TO SCALE

Nathan Rosen CAMA major application
Subject: Nathan Rosen CAMA major application
From: Kristie Corson <[e-mail]>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 11:49:36 -0400
To: Cyndi Karoly <[e-mail]>
CC: Tom Steffens <Tom. Steffens@ ncmail. net>, Doug Huggett <[e-mail]>
Cyndi/Tom,
Nathan Rosen is proposing to fill 100 square feet of coastal in order to
construct a bridge approach/driveway (15-foot wide by 141-feet long)
necesary to reach a proposed single family residence on a lot adjacent
to Pamlico Sound in Dare County. No water dependent structures are
proposed. Is this proposed fill activity a violation of water quality
standards?
The CAMA Major permit application arrived in the DCM Raleigh office on
day 76. The time needed for review and coordination is critical. Doug
and I would greatly appreciate your prompt review of this application.
We do not want to default. Please keep us posted on your review.
thanks,
Kristie
1
1 of 1 6/21/04 10:10 AM