The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNCG020029_COMPLETE FILE - HISTORICAL_20170724STORMWATER DIVISION CODING SHEET NCG PERMITS PERMIT NO. /V U&Ua Uba O' DOC TYPE HISTORICAL FILE ❑ MONITORING REPORTS DOC DATE ❑ YYYYMMDD Kir.1-0 Environmental `Quality July 24, 2017 JoHN TMERI DIVISION PRESIDENT P.O. Box 30013 RALEIGH, NC 27622+0013 ROY COOPER Governor MICHAEL S. REGAN Secretary Subject: Multimedia Compliance Inspection Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. Alamance County Dear Permittee: Department of Environmental Quality staff from the Winston-Salem Regional Office conducted a multimedia compliance inspection of Martin Marietta Materials, Inc, on July 13, 2017 for permits and programs administered by the following Divisions: Division of Air Division of Energy, Division of Water Division of Waste Quality Mineral, and Land Resources Management Resources We appreciate your cooperation during the inspection and hope that you have enjoyed the benefit of our initiative to provide a single inspector capable of handling multiple areas of environmental compliance at your facility. The results of each applicable inspection and any associated response actions or necessary corrective measures are detailed in the inspection letters/reports attached to this transmittal sheet. If a Division report is not attached, you may assume compliance with that Division's rules and regulations at the time of inspection. If you have any questions regarding this multimedia inspection, please contact Ryan Swaim at (336) 776- 9659 or ryan.swaim@ncdenr.gov. Thank you for your cooperation. enei: Air Quality Inspection Report DEMLR Inspection Report Stormwater Inspection Report cc: DAQ WSRO Files DEMLR WSRO Files DWR WSRO Files DWM WSRO Files State of North Carolina I Environmental Quality Winston-Salem Reglonafoffice 1450West Hanes Mill RoadSulte300 { Winston-Salem, North Carolina27105-7407 336 776 9800 T 1 336 776 9757 F NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY Inspection Report Date: 07/ 1312011 Facility Data Winston-Salem Regional Office Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. - East Alamance Query NC Facility ID 0100227 County/FIPS: Alamance/001 Permit Data Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. - East Alamance Quarry Permit 06132 / R18 2251 Martin Marietta Drive Issued 12/30/2016 Burlington, NC 27215 Expires 11/30/2024 Lat: 36d 7.7150m Long: 79d 21.3030m Classification Small SIC: 1429 / Crushed And Broken Stone Nec Permit Status Active NAICS: 212319 / Other Crushed and Broken Stone Mining and Quarrying Current Permit Application(s) None Contact Data Program Applicability Facility Contact Authorized Contact Technical Contact SIP Josh Turner John Tiberi Jay Nivens NSPS: Subpart 000 Plant Manager Division President Sr. Environmental (336) 578-5420 (919) 7814550 Engineer 704 409-1475 Compliance Data Comments: Inspector's Signature: ti Date of Signature: / - Z L/ I Total Actual esnisslans in TONS/YEAR: Inspection Date 07/13/2017 Inspector's Name Ryan Swaim Operating Status Operating Compliance Code Compliance - inspection Action Code FCE RS O"Ite Inspection Result Compliance TSP S02 NOX VOC CO PM10 * HAP 2015 0.6400 --- --- --- — 0.2400 --- 2010. 0.5800 -- -- --- — 0.2800 -- * Highest HAP Emitted Five Year Violation History: None Date Letter Tviae Rule Violated Violation Resolution Date Performed Stack Tests since last FCE: None Date Test Results Test Method(s) Source(s) Tested Permitted Sources Emission Source ID Emission Source Description Control System ID Control System Description Non -Metallic Mineral Processia Plant, utilizin water suppression with no other control devices including: ....... g .......... _. _........................... pp......._...... -....._ . .. �........ ,... ES -Convey jConVeying Operations NIA N/A ES -Crush Crushing Operations N/A- N/A ............... .... ... . ................. ES -Screen _� M...... Screening Operations _ r_...____.. — N/A N/A 1 Insignificant/Exempt Activities Source Exemption Source of Source of Title V ....... .... " -.._ .... _.. ........... Regulation ...... .. TAPS? Pollutants? ....... _. _. above -ground, above ound, diesel fuel storage teaks (10,000 � 2Q .0102 �— Yes Yes gallon capacity).... (c)(1)(D)(i) I-TO2 - above -ground, diesel fuel storage tanks (10,000- 12Q.0102 I Yes Yes gallon capacity) _.. . .. ................_.......-..........._........................................ ... (c)(1)(D)(i) .......__. .._. _... _.._......'.1..-......_...................................._ . I-TO3 - (NESHAP) above -ground gasoline storage tank Q .0102 Yes Yes (3,000-gallon capacity) : _. ...jF7 (c)(1)(D)(ii} - I-T04 - Seven (7) above -ground lubricating oil storage tanks less than 2,000-gallon '1(c)(1)(D)(i)._.. 2Q2Q 00102 Yes Yes (each with capacity) Introduction On July 13, 2017, Mr. Ryan Swaim, Environmental Specialist, of the DEMLR WSRO contacted Mr. Josh Turner, Plant Manager, and Jay Nivens of Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. — East Alamance Quarry for an announced targeted multi- media compliance inspection. The facility was previously inspected on June 8, 2016 by Paul Williams, Environmental Specialist, of the DAQ WSRO and was found to be operating in compliance at that time. The facility is a crushed stone quarry and typically operates lam to 5pm on a variable basis based on demand. Mr. Turner also stated that the facility has not added any new equipment since the last inspection. All IBEAM contacts were confirmed to be accurate. Safety Equipment Safety shoes, hard hat, safety vest and ear protection are required in areas of production. Wheel chocks are not required if parking in paved lot by the office. Applicable Regulations According to permit Condition A.1, the facility is subject to the following regulations: Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC), Subchapter 2D .0202, 2D .0501, 2D .0510, 2D .0521, 2D .0524 (40 CFR 60, Subpart 000), 2D .0535, 2D .0540, 2D .1806 and 2Q .0309. The facility is not subject to the RMP requirements of the 112(r) program since it does not use or store any of the regulated chemicals in quantities above the threshold in the rule. The facility is only subject to the General Duty clause of the Section 112(r) program because they do not produce, use or store any regulated chemicals in quantities above their corresponding threshold limits. Discussion This facility is a crushed stone quarrying and sales operation, with a vast majority of its product being sold to the construction and paving industries. Granite of various sizes are produced on -site. The facility was actively crushing (ES - Crush), screening (ES -Screen) and conveying (ES -Convey) during this inspection. The plant flow diagram and equipment list were reviewed and found to be dated April 14, 20I4 (fixed equipment list) and October 10, 2016 (Mobile'Equipment List) which matches what is on file at WSRO. Any changes to the non -primary crushing equipment are required to be submitted to DAQ, with an updated flow diagram, at least 15 days prior. The process begins as granite rock face is blasted and transported to the primary crusher. After the material is crushed it is sorted into various sizes through the screening and conveyor systems. Mr. Turner stated that the primary crusher is setup to operate at a 4.75-inch discharge opening setting. Smaller material bypasses the crusher as it drops out through a bypass screen. The materials are then transported, via conveyor, to the main screening operation where the material is processed through multiple screens, secondary crushers and a wash tower, before being conveyed to their appropriate surge pile. The facility was observed using the appropriate wet suppression on the conveying, crushing and screening operations. No visible emissions were observed at time of inspection. This facility lists several exempt.sources which include; two above -ground 10,000-gallon diesel fuel storage tanks (I -TO 1, I-T02), one 3,000 gallon above -ground gasoline storage tank (1-T03), and 7 above -ground lubricating oil storage tanks (I- T04). Each of these exempt sources were observed and found to be consistent as listed on the permit. Permit Conditions/ Applicable Regulations Condition A.2 contains 15A NCAC 213.0202 permit renewal and emissions inventory requirements. The permit expires November 30, 2024 and the facility is required to submit a renewal request and air pollution emission inventory report for the 2023 calendar year 90 days prior to the expiration of the permit. This condition was discussed with Mr. Turner and compliance with this condition is anticipated. Condition A.3 contains the 2D .0501(c) equipment reporting requirements. The permittee shall maintain an on -site equipment list and flow diagram of all equipment used covered under this permit. The equipment list and flow diagram are also required to include the revision date. The equipment list and plant flow diagram are kept in the main office and were observed to be completed and up to date. Compliance with this condition is indicated. Condition A.4 contains the requirements for 2D .0510 particulate control requirements for particles from sand, gravel or . crushed stone operations. This condition requires the facility to take steps to reduce, to a minimum, any particulate matter from becoming airborne to prevent exceeding the ambient air quality standards beyond the property line. This facility makes use of wet suppression in order to control process particulate matter. The wet suppression systems were observed and appeared to be functioning correctly at time of inspection. Compliance with this condition is anticipated. Condition A.5 contains the primary crusher specifications. This condition requires the facility to submit a permit application if any changes are made to the primary crusher other than like -for -like replacement. The primary crusher is listed as a 4248 Allis Chalmers and is rated at 615 tons per hour, at a 10-inch maximum jaw setting. Mr. Turner confirmed that the crusher was set at 4.75 inches and was producing approximately 375 tons/hr. Compliance with this condition is indicated. Condition A.6 contains the requirements for operating additionai.primary crushers. On April 16, 2014, the facility modified their permit in order to add portable, self-propelled, crushing, screening, feeder and conveyor units. This condition prohibits the facility from operating the primary crushers simultaneously and states that the throughput of any additional primary crusher shall not exceed the rated capacity of the 4248 Allis Chalmers Jaw Crusher (61 5 tons/hr. at a maximum discharge opening setting of 10-inches). At time of inspection the quarry only had one crusher on site according to Mr. Turner. Compliance with this condition is indicated. Condition A.7 contains the 15A NCAC 2D .0521 visible emissions control requirement. This facility is limited to 200/u opacity visible emissions, for sources manufactured after July 1, 1971, when averaged over a six -minute period. No visible emissions were observed during this inspection. Compliance with this condition is indicated. Condition AS contains the 15A NCAC 2D .0521 visible emissions control requirement. This facility is limited to 40% opacity visible emissions, for sources manufactured as of July 1, 1971, when averaged over a six -minute period. The facility does not operate any listed equipment manufactured as of July 1, 1971. Compliance with this condition is indicated. Condition A.10 contains the 15A NCAC 2D .0535 rule which requires the permittee to notify the director of any excess emissions lasting longer than four hours resulting from a malfunction, breakdown of process or control equipment or any other abnormal conditions. Mr. Turner stated that no process malfunctions have occurred since the last inspection and there are no issues registered to this facility in IBEAM. Compliance with this condition is indicated. Condition A.11 contains the 15A NCAC 2D .0540 fugitive dust control requirement. No fugitive dust was observed traveling beyond the property boundaries during this inspection. This facility operates a water tanker truck which was observed wetting the unpaved driving surfaces during the course of this inspection, indicating compliance with this condition. Condition A.12 contains the requirements for 2D .1806 control and prohibition of odorous emissions requirements. No objectionable odors were detected during the approach to the facility or at the property boundaries. The facility does not have any previous odor complaints in ]BEAM. Compliance with this condition is indicated. NSPS/NESHAP Condition A.9 contains the requirements for 2D .0524 New Source Performance Standards (NSPS), for the nonmetallic mineral processing equipment, as promulgated in 40 CFR 60, Subpart 000, including Subpart A "General Provisions". This condition applies to the crushing operations (ES -Crush), Conveying operations (ES -Convey) and Screening operations (ES -Screen).. Under this condition the following conditions are set: • Notify the Regional Supervisor, in writing, of the startup of an affected facility. • A 15% opacity limit is set for any crusher and I0% opacity for conveyor belts, screening operations and other affected facilities constructed, modified or re -constructed after August 31, 1983, but before April 22, 2008. • A 12% opacity limit is set for any crusher and 7% opacity.for conveyor belts, screening operations and other affected facilities constructed, modified or re -constructed on or after April 22, 2008. • Monthly inspections of the wet suppression systems are required for any affected equipment that commenced construction, modification or reconstruction on or after April 22, 2008 and must record these inspections within a logbook. No visible emissions were observed. The facility utilizes wet suppression for its conveying, screening and crushing operations. Compliance with this condition is indicated at this time. Condition A.13 contains the Federal Rules Applicable to Sources Exempted from Air Permitting Requirements, as promulgated in 49 CFR 63, Subpart CCCCCC (NESHAP). This requirement applies to each gasoline cargo tank during the delivery of product to a gasoline dispensing facility, including storage tank I-T03. A GDF with a monthly throughput of <I0,000 gallons of gasoline must comply with the requirements. • Minimize gasoline spills. • Clean up any spills as expeditiously as possible. • Cover all open gasoline containers and all storage tank fill pipes with a gasket seal when not in use. • Minimize gasoline sent to open waste collection systems. • Maintain records of monthly gasoline throughput. During this inspection, the gasoline storage tank, and surrounding area, was observed to be properly maintained and sealed. There was no evidence of any recent spills. Mr. Turner and Nivens indicated that the threshold for this requirement had not been exceeded and showed receipts of the gasoline purchased of just over 2,500 gallons used since February of 2016 to current. Compliance with this condition is indicated. This facility does not appear to be subject to any other NSPS/NESHAP rules at this time. Emissions Data The emissions data for 2010 and 2015 are located in the reportheader. 4 Permit Issues Thera do not appear to be any permit issues at this time. Stack/Source Testing Visible emissions testing was conducted, on January 29, 1998, on several conveyor belts, a double deck screen and VSI crusher. The testing produced maximum observed visible emissions of 5% opacity and satisfied the testing requirement within condition A (5) (c) of Permit 06132R09. 5 Year Compliance History There have been no NOD's, NOV's or NOVIRE's issued to this facility in the past 5 years. Conclusion Based on visual observation and review of records, Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. — East Alamance Quarry appears to be operating in compliance with all applicable Air Quality standards and regulations at the time of this inspection. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources, Land Quality Section MINE INSPECTION REPORT ® PERNUTTED MINE SITE ❑ UNPERMITTED MINE SITE 1. MINE NAME: East Alamance Quarry2. MINE LOCATION: 2251 Martin Marietta Dr._ 3. COUNTY: Alamance 4. RIVER BASIN: Cape Fear 5. CASE: 6. OPERATOR: Martin Marietta Materials Inc. 7. ADDRESS: 8701 Red Oak Blvd. Charlotte, NC 28217 8. NEPUNG PERMIT #: 01-08 ❑ N/A 9. PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE: 8-22-2018 El NIA 10. PERSON(S) CONTACTED AT SITE: Josh Turner and Jay Nievens 11. PICTURES? ❑ Yes ® No TAKEN BY: NA 12. TYPE OF INSPECTION: ❑ A. Initial Inspection (Unpermitted Mine Sites) 1. Size of affected land: ac: (attach sketch map) 2. How was this area measured? NA Measured by: NA ® B. Routine Inspection (Permitted Mine Sites) Q C. Fallow -up Inspection 13. Date of last inspection: 7-25-16 14. Any mining since that date? ® Yea El No If yes, cite evidence of such mining activity: Smaller aggregate was being produced at time of inspection. 15. Was mine operating at time of inspection? ® Yes No If yes, explain: The mine appeared to be operating at time of inspection with truck hauling and conveying activities observed at time of inspection._ 16. Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit? 0 Yes. Ej -No ❑ NIA If no, explain: 17. Is the .mine incompliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit? El Yes ❑ No ® NIA If no, explain: 18. Is there any off -site damage? A. ❑ Yes B. N No C. ❑ None observed If A, describe the type and severity of the damage: If B or C, is there potential for offsite damage? ❑ Yes ® No Explain: 19. Corrective measures needed and/or taken: N 20. Other recommendations and comments: Please provide this office with the most current version of the approved mine map. Provide stabilization for the settling pond #1 cleanout activities where equipment damage has occurred. Take steps to ensure all settling ponds are functioning as designed. Remove excess vegetation from inside all settling pond riser pipes. Provide adequate stabilization on all stockpiled dirt as discussed in field. 21. Is the Annual Reclamation Report +/- map accurate? U Yes LI No (Explain) U Not Reviewed M NIA 22. Follow-up inspection needed? LJ Yes Q9 No Proposed date NA 23. No. of additional pages of Inspection Report NA 24. Copy of Report sent to operator 7/24/2017 INSPECTED BY: Ryan Swaim DATE 7-13-17 Telephone No: 336-776-9659 Copy to file Copy to operator Copy to Mining Specialist Compliance IngRqgtion Report Permit NCG020029 Effective: 10/01/15 Expiration: 09/30/20 Owner: Marlln Marietta Materials Inc SOC: Effective: Expiration, Facility: East Alamance Quarry County: Alamance 1666 Hwy 49 N Region: Winston-Salem Haw River NC 27258 Contact Person: Jay Nivens Title: Phone: 704-409-1475 Directions to Facility: System Clasalflcatlons: Primary ORC: Certification: Phone: Secondary ORC(s): On -Site Represontative(s): Related Pemafts: Inspection Date: 07/1312017 Entry Time: 09:30AM Exit Time: 12:30PM Primary Inspector: Ryan Swaim Phone: 336-776-9659 Secondary Inspoctor(a): Ree4on for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Permit Inspoction Type: Mining Activities Stormwater Discharge COC Facility Status: Compliant [] Not Compliant Question Areas: Storm Water (See attachment summary) Page: 1 Permit NCGO20029 owner - Facility: Martin Marlelta Materials Imo Inspection Date: 07113M017 Inspectioom Type : Compllance Evaluation Reason for Via t Routine Inspection Summary: Page: 2 pemdC NCGD20029 owner- Foolllty: Martin Marlette Materials Inc Inspection Deb: 07/1312017 Inspvatlon Typo: Compllenoe Evaluation Reesan for Vlslt:- Routine Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan? Yee No NA NE S ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan Include a General Location (USGS) map? S ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a 'Narrative Description of Practices"? E ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a detailed site map Including outfall locations and drainage areas? ®❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a list of signlflcant spills occurring during the past 3 years? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices? ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a BMP summary? ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan Include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)? S ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan Include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the facility provide and document Employee Training? ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan Include a list of Responsible Party(s)? S ❑ ❑ ❑ # Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually? E ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facillty Inspection Program? ❑ ❑ ❑ Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented? E ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: A Copy of the SWPPP was reviewed and was found to be up to date for the 2017 year. Yes No NA NE Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment, Qualitative monitoring was being completed as theNCG permit requires. Analytical Monitodna Yes No NA NE Has the facility conducted Its Analytical monitoring? 1111 ❑ # Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Comment: Analytical monitorfna was also being completed as rectuired. Permit and Outfalle # Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Were all outfalls observed during the Inspection? ❑ ❑ ❑ # If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ ❑ # Has the facility evaluated all Illicit (non atormwater) discharges? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: Ail components ofpie NCG etmit appealed to be in good order and the site insoection reflected Its reguirementp. Page: 3 , _77 Environmental Quality June 22, 2016 JOHN TIBERI — PRESIDENT MID -ATLANTIC DCvisiON MARTIN MARII.TTA MATERIALS, INC. 2710 WYCLIFF ROAD RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA 27607 Dear Permittee: PAT McCRORY Governor DONALD R. VAN DER VAART secrurury Subject: Multimedia Compliance Inspection Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. — East Alamance Quarry Alamance Department of Environment and Natural Resources staff from the Raleigh Regional Office conducted a multimedia compliance inspection of Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. — East Alamance Quarry on June 8, 2016 for permits and programs administered by the following Divisions: Division of Air Division of Energy, Division of Water Division of Waste Quality Mineral, and Land Resources Management Resou roes - We appreciate your cooperation during the inspection and hope that you have enjoyed the benefit of our initiative to provide a single inspector capable of handling multiple areas of environmental compliance at your facility. The results of each applicable inspection and any associated response actions or necessary corrective measures are detailed in the inspection letters/reports attached to this transmittal sheet. If a Division report is not attached, you may assume compliance with that particular Division's rules and regulations at the time of inspection. If you have any questions regarding this multimedia inspection, please contact Jack Kitchen at (919) 218- 8409 or Jack.Kitchen@ncdenr.gov. Thank you for your cooperation. encl: Air Quality Inspection Report Mining Inspection Report Stormwater Inspection Report cc: DAQ WSRO Files DEMLR WSRO Files DWR WSRO Files DWM WSRO Files State of North Carokna I EnvironmrntalQuality Wlnston-Salem Regional Office 1 450 West Hanes Mill Road Suite 300 1 Winston-Salem, North Cardin 27105-7407 336 776 9600 T 1 336 T76 9797 F e'- y NORTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF AIR QUALITY Inspection Report Date: 06/ 16/2016 Facility Data Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. - East Alamance Quarry 1666 North NC Highway 49 Haw River, NC 27258 Lot: 36d 7.7150m Long: 79d 21.3030m SIC: 1429 / Crushed And Broken Stone Nec NAICS: 212319 / Other Crushed and Broken Stone Mining and Quarrying Contact Data Facility Contact Authorized Contact Technical Contact Josh Turner John Tiberi Jay Nivens 'Plant Manager Division President Sr. Environmental (336)584-8875 (919)781-4550 Engineer (704)409-1475 Comments: Inspector's Signature: Date'ofSignature: Total Actual emissions in TONSIYFAR Winston-Salem Regional Office Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. - East Alamance Quarry NC Facility ID 0100227 County/FIPS: Alamance/001 Permit Data Permit 06132 / R17 Issued 4/16/2014 Expires 1/31/2017 Classification Small Permit Status Active Current Permit Application(s) None Program Applicability SIP NSPS: Subpart 000 Compliance Data Inspection Date- 06/08/2016 Inspector's Name Paul E Williams Operating Status Operating Compliance Code Compliance - inspection Action Code FCE On -Site Inspection Result Compliance 1 TSP S02 NOX VOC CO PMIO * HAP 2010 0.5800 --- --- --- --- 0.2800 --- 2006 2.03 --- --- --- --- 0.9700 --- * Hi hest HAP Emitted (inpounds) Five Year Violation History: None Date Letter Tyge Rule Violated Violation Resolution Date Performed Stack Tests since last FCE: None .Date Test Results Test Methods) Sources Tested Permitted Emission Sources Emission. Source CD Emission Source ..... Description Control System ID FControl System Description. III Non.Metallic Mineral ProcessingPlant utilizingwater suppression with no other control devices including.-: pp ES -Convey : EConvey�ng Operations rW_ N/A NIA ................... I _ ES -Crush Crushing Operations _ NIA I NIA '. NIA ES -Screen :Screening Operations NIA ..... InAfinificantfF.xemnt Activities Exemption Source of Source of Title V Source Regulation TAPS? Pollutants? I -TO 1 - above -ground, diesel fuel storage tanks { 10,000- Q .0102 F(C) yes Yes gallon capacity} (1)(D)(i) i-T02 - above round diesel fuel storage tanks (10 000- 2Q .0102 yes Yes gallon capacity) __..._::_.-__-- (c)(1)(D)G} — — �.------- --- I-T03 - (NESHAP) above -ground gasoline storage tank '(3,000_gallon —._ ---- 2Q .0102 ((c)(I)(D)(ii) ---- Yes -- Yes capacity) I-T04 Seven (7) above -ground lubricating oil storage 2Q 0102 Yes Yes tanks (each with less than 2,000-gallon capacity) Introduction On June 8, 2016, Mr. Paul Williams, Environmental Specialist, of the DAQ WSRO contacted Mr. Josh Turner, Plant Manager, of Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. — East Alamance Quarry for an announced targeted multi -media compliance inspection. The facility was previously inspected on March 25, 2015 by Steve Helms, former Environmental Specialist, of WSRO and was found to be operating in compliance at that time. The facility is a crushed stone quarry and typically operates lam to 5pm on a variable basis based on demand. Mr. Turner stated that business has been slow and that the facility has only operated the crushers twice so far in 2016. Most of the stone being sold is being trucked in from their Burlington quarry. Mr. Turner also stated that the facility has not added any new equipment since the last inspection. All IBEAM contacts were confirmed to be accurate. Safety Equipment Safety shoes, hard hat, safety vest and ear protection are required in areas of production. Wheel chocks are not required if parking in paved lot by the office. Latitude[Longitude Verifications The latitude and longitude coordinates were verified to be accurate as documented in IBEAM. Applicable Regulations According to permit Condition A.1, the facility is subject to the following regulations: Title 15A North Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC), Subchapter 2D .0202, 2D .0501, 2D .0510, 2D .0521, 2D .0524 . (40 CFR 60, Subpart 000), 2D .0535, 2D .0540, 2D .1806 and 2Q .0309. The facility is not subject to the RMP requirements of the 112(r) program since it does not use or store any of the regulated chemicals in quantities above the threshold in the rule. The facility is only subject to the General Duty clause of the Section 112(r) program because they do not produce, use or store any regulated chemicals in quantities above their corresponding threshold limits. Discussion This facility is a crushed stone quarrying and sales operation, with a vast majority of its product being -sold to the construction and paving industries. Granite of various sizes are produced on -site. The facility was not actively crushing (ES -Crush), screening (ES -Screen) or conveying (ES -Convey) during this inspection. The plant flow diagram and equipment list were reviewed and found to be dated April 14, 2014 which matches what is on file at WSRO. Any changes to the non -primary crushing equipment are required to be submitted to DAQ, with an updated flow diagram, at least 15 days prior. The process begins as granite rock face is blasted and transported to the primary crusher. After the material is crushed it is sorted into various sizes through the screening and conveyor systems. On the day 2 of this inspection, crushes and sorted stone was observed being loaded into haul trucks, though the quarry was not actively in production. Mr. Turner stated that the primary crusher is. setup to operate at a 4.5-inch discharge opening setting. Smaller material bypasses the crusher as it drops out through a bypass screen. This step is effective in minimizing wear to the crusher jaws. The materials are then transported, via conveyor, to the main screening operation where the material is processed through multiple screens, secondary crushers and a wash tower, before being conveyed to their appropriate surge pile. When operating the facility utilizes wet suppression on the conveying, crushing and screening operations. This facility lists several exempt sources which include; two above -ground 10,000-gallon diesel fuel storage tanks (I-TOI, I-T02), one 3,000 gallon above -ground gasoline storage tank (i-T03), and 7 above- ground lubricating oil storage tanks (1-T04). Each of these exempt sources were observed and found to be consistent as listed on the permit. Permit Conditions/ Applicable Regulations Condition A42 contains 15A NCAC 2D .0202 permit renewal and emissions inventory requirements. The permit expires January 31, 2017 and the facility is required to submit a renewal request and air pollution emission inventory report for the 2015 calendar year 90 days prior to the expiration of the permit. This condition was discussed with Mr. Turner and compliance with this condition is anticipated. Condition A.3 contains the 2D .0501(c) equipment reporting requirements. The permittee shall maintain an on -site equipment list and flow diagram of all equipment used covered under this permit. The equipment list and flow diagram are also required to include the revision,date. The equipment list and plant flow diagram are kept in the main office and were observed to be completed and up to date. Compliance with this condition is indicated. Condition A.4 contains the requirements for 2D .0510 particulate control requirements for particles from sand, gravel or crushed stone operations. This condition requires the facility to take steps to reduce, to a minimum, any particulate matter from becoming airborne to prevent exceeding the ambient air quality standards beyond the property line. This facility makes use of wet suppression in order to'control process particulate matter. The wet suppression systems were not observed operating during this inspection since the facility was not in production. Compliance with this condition is anticipated. Condition A.5 contains the primary crusher specifications. This condition requires the facility to submit a permit application if any changes are made to the primary crusher other than like -for -like replacement. The primary crusher is listed as a 4248 Allis Chalmers and is rated at 615 tons per hour, at a 10 inch maximum jaw setting. Mr. Turner confirmed that the crusher was set at 4.5 inches and has a maximum operating capacity of less than 655 tons per hour. Compliance with this condition is indicated. Condition A.6 contains the requirements for operating additional primary crushers. On April 16, 2014, the facility modified their permit in order to add portable, self-propelled, crushing, screening, feeder and conveyor units. This condition prohibits the facility from operating the primary crushers simultaneously and states that the throughput of any additional primary crusher shall not exceed the rated capacity of the 4248 Allis Chalmers Jaw Crusher (615 tons/hr. at a maximum discharge opening setting of I0-inches). Mr. Turner stated that the portable crusher had been removed from the site and the facility has no immediate plans to return it to this facility at this time. Compliance with this condition is indicated. Condition A.7 contains the 15A NCAC 2D .0521 visible emissions control requirement. This facility is limited to 20% opacity visible emissions, for sources manufactured after July 1, 1971, when averaged over a six -minute period. No visible emissions were observed during this inspection, since the facility was not operating. Compliance with this condition is anticipated. Condition A.8 contains the 15A NCAC 2D .0521 visible emissions control requirement. This facility is limited to 40% opacity visible emissions, for sources manufactured as of July 1, 1971, when -averaged over a six -minute period. No visible emissions were observed during this inspection and the facility does not operate any listed equipment manufactured as of July 1, 1971. Compliance with this condition is indicated. Condition A.10 contains the 15A NCAC 2D .0535 rule which requires the permittee to notify the director of any excess emissions lasting longer than four hours resulting from a malfunction, breakdown of process or control equipment or any other abnormal conditions. Mr. Turner stated that no process malfunctions have occurred since the last inspection and there are no issues registered to this facility in IBEAM. Compliance with this condition is indicated. Condition A.11 contains the 15A NCAC 2D .0540 fugitive dust control requirement. No fugitive dust was observed traveling beyond the property boundaries during this inspection. This facility operates a water tanker truck which was observed wetting the unpaved driving surfaces during the course of this inspection, indicating compliance with this condition. Condition A.12 contains the requirements for 2D .1806 control and prohibition of odorous emissions requirements. No objectionable odors were detected during the approach to the facility or at the property boundaries: The facility does not have any previous odor complaints in IBEAM. Compliance with this condition is indicated. NSPS/NESHAP Condition A.9 contains the requirements for 2D .0524 New Source Performance Standards (NSPS), for 'the nonmetallic mineral processing equipment, as promulgated in 40 CFR 60, Subpart 000, including Subpart A "General Provisions". This condition applies to the crushing operations (ES -Crush), Conveying operations (ES -Convey) and Screening operations (ES -Screen). Under this condition the following conditions are set: • Notify the Regional Supervisor, in writing, of the startup of an affected facility. • A 15% opacity limit is set for any crusher and 10% opacity for conveyor belts, screening operations and other affected facilities constructed, modified or re -constructed after August 31, 1983, but before April 22, 2008. • A 12% opacity limit is set for any crusher and 7% opacity for conveyor belts, screening operations and other affected facilities constructed, modified or re -constructed on or after April 22, 2008. + Monthly inspections of the wet suppression systems are required for any affected equipment that commenced construction, modification or reconstruction on or after April 22, 2008 and must record these inspections within a logbook. No visible emissions were observed, since the plant was not actively operating during this inspection. The facility utilizes wet suppression for its conveying, screening and crushing operations. Mr. Turner stated that the facility does not maintain a logbook of the I/M activities, for the wet suppression system, since none of the affected equipment was constructed, modified or reconstructed on or after April 22, 2008. Mr. Turner also stated that if any of the equipment falls under this requirement, in the future, they will keep and maintain a logbook of these actions. Compliance with this condition is indicated at this time. Condition A.13 contains the Federal Rules Applicable to Sources Exempted from Air Permitting Requirements, as promulgated in 49 CFR 63, Subpart CCCCCC (NESHAP). This requirement applies to i each gasoline cargo tank during the delivery of product to a gasoline dispensing facility, including storage tank I-T03. A GDF with a monthly throughput of <10,060 gallons of gasoline must comply with the requirements: • Minimize gasoline spills. • Clean up any spills as expeditiously as possible. • Cover all open gasoline containers and all storage tank fill pipes with a gasket seal when not in use. • Minimize gasoline sent to open waste collection systems. • Maintain records of monthly gasoline throughput. During this inspection the gasoline storage tank, and surrounding area, was observed to be properly maintained and sealed. There was no evidence of any recent spills. Monthly. throughput records were reviewed and found to be complete. Records were reviewed and indicated that 4 gasoline deliveries were made in 2015, totaling 2.059.1 gallons. There have been 3 deliveries thus far in 2016, which total 1,502.0 gallons. 'Compliance with this condition is indicated. This facility does not appear to be subject to any other NSPS/NESHAP rules at this time. Facility Wide Emissions .Actual and potential emissions from permit review RI 7 for Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. — East Alamance Quarry (Sharon Wyatt, April 16, 2014). Pollutant CY2010 Actual Emissions, tons/year Potential Emissions, tons/year 'with wet suppression without wet suppression' PM 2.03 51.04 536.67 PM 10 0.28 18.52 191.47 PM2.5 Not gjven 2.52 186.88 Permit Issues There do not appear to be any permit issues at this time. Stack/Source Testing Visible emissions testing was conducted, on January 29, 1998, on several conveyor belts, a double deck screen and VSI crusher. The testing produced maximum observed visible emissions of 5% opacity and satisfied the testing requirement within condition A (5) (c) of Permit 06132R09. 5 Year Compliance History There have been no NOD's, NOV's or NOWRE's issued to this facility in the past 5 years. Conclusion Based on visual observation and review of records, Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. — East Alamance Quarry appears to be operating in compliance with all applicable Air Quality standards and regulations at the time of this inspection. 5 Compliance Inspection Report Permit: NCG020029 Effective: 10101/15 Expiration: 09/30/20 Owner : Martin Marietta Materials Inc SOC: Effective: Expiration: Facility: East Alamance Quarry County: Alamance 1666 Hwy 49 N Region: Winston-Salem Haw River NC 27258 Coritact Person: Jay Nivens Title: Phone: 704-409-1475 Directions to Facility: System Classifications: Primary ORC: Certification: Phone: Secondary ORC(s): On -Site Representative(s): Related Permits: inspection Date: 06108/2016 Entry Time: 09:30AM Exit Time: 12:301`M Primary Inspector: Sue L Homewood Phone: 336-776-9694 Secondary inspector(s): Reason for Inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Permit Inspection Type: Mining Activities Stormwater Discharge COC Facility Status: ® Compliant Not Compliant Question Areas: Storm Water (See attachment summary) Page: 1 Permit: NCG020029 Owner - Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc Inspection Date: 0610812016 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine Inspection Summary: Page: 2 Permit: NCG020029 Owner - Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc Inspection Rate: 06108/2016 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason For Visit: Routine Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: Monitoring conducted 1/29/15, 4128115, 9/23/15, all within limits. No discharge activity from Vehicle Maintenance area. Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE # Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ ❑ ❑ # Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwaler) discharges? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: New basin at shop, installed about 2 Years, acting as primary containment. Pit discharge pumped to water trucks and adjacent pond, samples taken from pipe. Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: Monitoring conducted June 2015, December 2015 and April 2016 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Yes No NA NE Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"? E ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas? E ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years? E ❑ ❑ ❑ # Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a BMP summary? E ❑ i❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)? 0 [] ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the facility provide and document Employee Training? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually? E ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program? ❑ [] [] Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented? ❑ ❑ ❑ Page: 3 Permit: NCG020029 Owner - Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc Inspection Date: 06108/2016 Inspection Type : Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Yes No NA NE Comment: Most recent plan was updated in April 2016 Page: 4 North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources, Land Quality Section MINE INSPECTION REPORT X PERMITTED MINE SITE ❑ UNPERMITTED MINE SITE 1. MINE NAME: East Alamance Quarry_ 2. MINE LOCATION: Haw River 3. COUNTY: Alamance 4. RIVER BASIN: Cape Fear _ 5. CASE: 6. OPERATOR: Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. Attn: Mr. Brian North, 7. ADDRESS: 413 S. Chimney Rock Road Greensboro, NC 27409 - + 8. MINING PERMIT #: 01-08 ❑ N/A 9. PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE: 08-22-2018 ❑ N/A 10. PERSON(S) CONTACTED AT SITE: Jay Nivens / Josh Turner 11. PICTURES? ❑ Yes X No TAKEN BY: 12. TYPE OF INSPECTION: ❑ A. Initial Inspection (Unpermitted Mine Sites) 1. Si7e of affected land: ac. (attach sketch map) 2. How was this area measured? Measured by: ® B. Routine Inspection (Permitted Mine Sites) n C. Follow-up Inspection 13. Date of last inspection: 14. Any mining since that date? ® Yes ❑ No If yes, cite evidence of such mining activity: Mine in operation at time of inspection 15. Was mine operating at time of inspection? ® Yes ❑ No If yes, explain: _Stone being._ transferred offsite. 16. Is the mine in compliance with the Operating Conditions of the Permit? ® Yes ❑ No ❑ N/A If no, explain: 17. Is the mine in compliance with the Reclamation Conditions of the Permit? ❑ Yes ❑ No ® N/A If no, explain: 18. Is there any off -site damage? A. ❑ Yes B. ® No C. ❑ None observed If A, describe the type and severity of the damage: If B or C, is there potential for offsite damage? ❑ Yes ® No Explain: 19. Corrective measures needed and/or taken: N/A 20. Other recommendations and comments: 1. Ensure buffer area is maintained around creek and an disturbed areas are stabilized per the approved mining permit. 21. Is the Annual Reclamation Report +/- map accurate? ® Yes ❑ No (Explain) ❑ Not Reviewed ❑ N/A 22. Follow-up inspection needed? LI Yes L!j No Proposed date 23. No. of additional pages of Inspection Report 0 24. Copy of Report sent to operator INSPECTED BY: Chuck Kirchner (Team-2 Multimedia DATE 6-8-16 Telephone No: 336-776-9800 Copy to file Copy to operator Copy to Mining Specialist Permit: NCG020029 SOC: County: Alamance Region: Winston-Salem Contact Person: Jay Nivens Directions to Facility: System Classifications: Primary ORC: Secondary ORC(s): On -Site Representative(s): Related Permits: Compliance inspection Report Effective: 10/01/15 Expiration: 09/30/20 Owner; Martin Marietta Materiais Inc Effective: Expiration: Facility: East Alamance Quarry 1666 Hwy 49 N Haw River NC 27258 Title: Phone: 704-409-1475 Inspection Date: 07/13/2017 Primary Inspector: Ryan Swaim Secondary Inspector(s): Certification: Phone: Entry Time: 09:30AM Exit Time: 12:30PM Phone: 336-776-9659 Reason for inspection: Routine Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Permit Inspection Type: Mining Activities Stormwater Discharge COC Facility Status: Compliant Not Compliant Question Areas: Storm Water (See attachment summary) Page: 1 permit: NCG020029 Owner - Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc Inspection Data: 07113/2017 Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine Inspection Summary: Page: 2 Permit: NCG020029 Owner - Facility: Martin Marietta Materials Inc Inspection Date: 07/13/2017 Inspection Type; Compliance Evaluation Reason for Via it: Routine Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan . Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan? # Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map? # Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"? # Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas? # Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years? # Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices? # Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment? # Does the Plan include a BMP summary? # Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)? # Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan? # Does the facility provide and document Employee Training? # Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)? # Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually? # Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program? Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented? Comment: A copy of the SWPPP was reviewed and was found to be up to date for the 2017 year. Qualitative Monitoring Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? Comment: Qualitative monitorincLwas being completed as the NCG permit requires. Analytical Monitoring Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? # Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? Comment: Analytical monitoring was also being completed as required. Yes No NA NE ■❑❑❑ ■❑❑❑ ■❑❑❑ ■❑❑❑ ■❑❑❑ Yes No NA NE ❑ ❑ ❑ Yes No NA NE ■❑❑❑ Cl ❑ E ❑ Permit and Outfalls Yea No NA NE # Is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Were all outfalls observed during the inspection? ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ # If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ # Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? 0 ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: All components of the NCG permit appeared to be in good order and the site inspection_ reflected its requirements. Page: 3 MINING PERMITAPPLICATION REVIEW FORM for DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY Project: CArz- �c Rrac-E (�UZCounty: **Due Date for Comments Back to Land Quality Section.-__R1 16 ** Water Quality Section Review: Assigned to- Je iVl q bYaz_gai� Date Review Completed W`k 1 �ZCM8 Will the operation, as proposed, violate standards of water quality? No CQmments:lte._ ihI60-4. as P(-pDOw_J. W k 11 Jlsi_� b O_qq acmes r r r� r r r r• r � r� ♦ � r NPDES permit required NPDES permit existing Nondischarge permit required Nondischarge permit existing Wetianda-disturbed ✓— 401 Wetland Cer1_ required YES rho I CCb '(Permit ) NIA (Permit n ) NtA Approved by: ADate: H (� g 9199 NO Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director Division of Water Quality December 1, 2006 - �matd=M=Mae=6wrr8; - Martin Marietta Materials 2710 Wycliff Road Raleigh, NC 27607 Subject: NPDES Mining General Permit Inspection Martin Marietta Materials — East Alamance Quarry (NCG020029) Alamance County Dear Mr. Moe: On November 28, 2006, Jenny Freeman of this office performed a General Permit Inspection at Martin Marietta Materials — East Alamance Quarry located at 1666 Highway 49 North in Alamance County, North Carolina. This facility holds General Permit No. NCG020029 under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to discharge Stormwater and Wastewater from Mining Activities. Nuwan Wijesuriya (Environmental Engineer) and Tony Jenkins (Plant Manager) were present for the inspection. This type of inspection consists of two basic parts: an in -office review of facility files and self -monitoring data and an on -site inspection of the facility's discharge outfalls. This particular inspection evaluated five (5) areas, and observations from each area are addressed below: 1. Permit The permit became effective January 19, 2005 and expires December 31, 2009. 2, Records/Reports As required by the permit, the facility has implemented a Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) Plan for the site. All mandatory paperwork was available during the inspection, including monitoring records, secondary containment information, and a complete map of the quarry with the outfalls marked and labeled. The facility also has a Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan dated April 10, 2003. Plant staff observes accumulated stormwater in the secondary containment areas prior to release; records of these inspections are maintained with permit records and reports. 3. Facility Site Review Materials stored outside include kerosene (--250 gallon tank) and bulk oil storage, all in secondary containment. The facility does conduct on site vehicle maintenance, utilizing more than 55 gallons per month of new motor oil. Mine dewatering wastewater is pumped from the borrow pit to discharge outfall. 4. Effluent/Receiving Waters Stormwater and wastewater from the property discharges to Boyds Creek (Class C; NSW) in the Cape Fear River Basin. There are two stormwater discharge outfalls: shop maintenance area drainage (SD02), and overburden maintenance area drainage (SD03). Both outfalls have settling ponds prior to discharge. The ponds are routinely cleaned out.. The pond in the overburden maintenance area had been cleaned out the day before the inspection. There is one wastewater discharge; the effluent appeared clear with no traceable solids. North Carolina Division of Water Quality 585 Waughtown Street Winston Salem NC 27107 Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.us o ` NCarolina NWturally Phone (336) 771-5000 Customer Service FAX (336) 771-4630 1-877-623-6748 An Equal OpportunitylAffirmative Action Employer — 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper Martin Marietta Materials — East Alamance Quarry 1 Page 2 December 1, 2006' 5. Self -Monitoring Program The facility uses TriTest Laboratories for sample analysis. The facility is required to perform: (1) Annual analytical monitoring for stormwater discharges from land disturbing activities and process areas, (2) Annual analytical monitoring for stormwater discharges from on -site vehicle maintenance (3) Semi-annual qualititative monitoring for stormwater discharges from land disturbance areas, process areas, and vehicle maintenance areas, (4) Quarterly analytical monitoring for mine dewatering wastewater, and (5) Weekly inspections of all stormwater BMPs An on -site review of the monitoring data during the inspection showed that ail parameters were evaluated per the specifications of the permit. You are found to be in compliance with General Permit No. NCG020029, Please refer to the attached report for further details from the inspection. if you have any questions concerning this report, please contact Ms. Freeman or me at (336) 771-5000. Sincerely, Steve W. Tedder Regional Supervisor. Surface Water Protection Section cc: NPS Assistance & Compliance Oversight Unit SWP — Central Files .•SWP W.SRO� United States Environmental Protection Agency Form Approved. ' EPA Washington, D.C. 2046C OMB No. 2040-0057 Water Compliance Inspection Report Approval expires 8-31-98 Section A: National Data System Coding (i.e., PCS) Transaction Code NPDES yr/mo/day Inspection Type Inspector Fac Type - 1 N 1 - 5 IVCGUTOLrZ9 - — lTrIZB -0 i-VI—WoS Remarks J I 1 1 16 Inspection Work Days Facility Self -Monitoring Evaluation Rating 81 CA --------------------------- Reserved ---------------------- L 80 671 169 701 31 711 1 721 NI 73 W 74 711 1 1 1 _ 1 _ I Section B: Facility.Data Name and Location of Facility Inspected (For Industrial Users discharging to POTW, afso include Entry Timetbate Permit Effective Date POTW name and NPDES permit Number) 11:00 AM 06/11/28 05/01/19 East Alamance Quarry Exit Time/Date Permit Expiration Date 1666 Hwy 49 N Haw River NC 2725E 12:00 PM 06/11/28 09/12/31 Name(s) of Onsite Representative (s)/Titles(s)/Ph one and Fax Number(s) Other Facility Data Name, Address of Responsible Official/Title/Phone and Fax Number Contacted Steve Whitt,PO Box 30013 Raleigh NC 27622//919-781-4550/9195104739 No Section C: Areas Evaluated During Inspection (Check only those areas evaluated) Permit ® Records/Reports ® Self -Monitoring Program ® Facility Site Review Effluent/Receiving Waters Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary) (See attachment summary) Name(s) and Signature(s) of Inspector(s) Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date Jennifer M. Freeman WSRO wQ//336-771-5000/ / l Signature of Manageme t O A Reviewer Agency/Office/Phone and Fax Numbers Date iG ��o EPA Form 3560-3 (Rev 9-94) Previous editions are obsolete. Page # 1 NPDES yr/mo/day inspection Type 3I NCG020029 111 12I 06/11/28 I 17 18IWI (cont.) Section D: Summary of Finding/Comments (Attach additional sheets of narrative and checklists as necessary) nnv Freeman of this office performed a General Permit Insr)ection at Martin IVIaIIMUCI IVICILCIIdIJ — L:dJL J'UOIIIdI1GC UUdlIy Wi dil;U dL IUUU rllyIIVVdy'id INIUILI1 Ill MldlIIdIIGC UUUIIty, NUI U I — Carolina. This facility holds General Permit No. NCG020029 under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) to discharge Stormwater and Wastewater from Mining Activities. Nuwan Wijesuriya (Environmental Engineer) and Tony Jenkins (Plant Manager) were present for the inspection. This type of inspection consists of two basic parts: an in -office review of facility files and self -monitoring data and an on -site inspection of the facility's discharge outfalls. This particular inspection evaluated five (5) areas, and observations from each area are addressed below: 1. Permit The permit. became effective January 19, 2005 and expires December 31, 2009. 2. Records/Reports As required by the permit, the facility has implemented a Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) Plan for the site. All mandatory paperwork was available during the inspection, including monitoring records, secondary containment information, and a complete map of the quarry with the outfalls marked and labeled.. The facility also has a Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan dated April 10, 2003. Plant staff observes accumulated stormwater in the secondary containment areas prior to release; records of these inspections are maintained with permit records and reports. 3. Facility Site Review Materials stored outside include kerosene (--250 gallon tank) and bulk oil storage, all in secondary containment. The facility does conduct on site vehicle maintenance, utilizing more than 55 gallons per month of new motor oil. Mine dewatering wastewater is pumped from the borrow pit to discharge outfall. 4. Effluent/Receiving Waters Stormwater and wastewater from the property discharges to Boyds Creek (Class C; NSW) in the Cape Fear River Basin. There are two stormwater discharge outfalls: shop maintenance area drainage (SDO2), and overburden maintenance area drainage (SDO3). Both outfalls have settling ponds prior to discharge. The ponds are routinely cleaned out. The pond in the overburden maintenance'area had been cleaned out the day before the inspection. There is one wastewater discharge; the effluent appeared clear with no traceable solids. 5. Self -Monitoring Program The facility uses ThTest Laboratories for sample analysis. The facility is required to perform: (1) Annual analytical monitoring for stormwater discharges from land disturbing activities and process areas, (2) Annual analytical monitoring for stormwater discharges from on -site vehicle maintenance areas, (3) Semi-annual quantitative monitoring for stormwater discharges from land disturbance areas, process areas, and vehicle maintenance areas, (4) Quarterly analytical monitoring for mine dewatering wastewater, and (5) Weekly inspections of all stormwater BMPs An on -site review of the monitoring data during the inspection showed that all parameters were evaluated per the specifications of the permit. You are found to be in compliance with General Permit No. NCG020029. Page # 2 Permit: NCG020029 Inspection Date: 11128/2006 Owner - Facility: East Alamance Quarry Inspection Type: Stormwater Permit (If the present permit expires in 6 months or less). Has the permittee submitted a new application? n n n Is the facility as described in the permit? ■ n n n # Are there any special conditions for the permit? ❑ ■ n n Is access to the plant site restricted to the general public? n n n Is the inspector granted access to all areas for inspection? ❑ L n Comment: Page # 3 Michael F. Easley, Governor William G. Ross Jr., Secretary North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources Alan W. Klimek, P.E. Director Division of Water Quality February 7, 2005 Donald M Moe Martin Marietta Materials Inc PO Box 30013 Raleigh, NC 276220013 Subject: NPDES Stormwater Permit Coverage Renewal East Alamance Quarry COC Number NCG020029 Alamance County Dear Permittee: In response to your renewal application for continued coverage under general permit NCG020000 the Division of Water Quality (DWQ) is forwarding herewith the reissued stormwater general permit. Please review the new permit to familiarize yourself with the changes in the reissued permit. The general permit authorizes discharges of stormwater and some types of wastewater. You must meet the provisions of the permit for the types of discharges present at your facility. This permit is reissued pursuant to the requirements of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1 and the Memorandum of Agreement between the state of North Carolina and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, dated December 6, 1983. The following information is included with your permit package: • A new Certificate of Coverage A copy of General Stormwater Permit NCG020000 • A copy of a Technical Bulletin for the general permit • Five copies of Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR) Forms - wastewater and stormwater Five copies of Qualitative Monitoring Report Form Your coverage under this general permit is not transferable except after notice to DWQ. The Division may require modification or revocation and reissuance of the Certificate of Coverage. This permit does not affect the legal requirements to obtain other permits which may be required by DENR or relieve the permittee from responsibility for compliance with any other applicable federal, state, or local law, rule, standard, ordinance, order, judgment, or decree. If you have any questions regarding this permit package please contact Aisha Lau of the Central Office Stormwater Permitting Unit at (919) 733-5083, ext.578. Sincerely, for Alan W. Klimek, P.E. cc: Central Files Stormwater & General Permits Unit Files Winston-Salem Regional Office one NoahCarolina Xaturally North Carolina Division of Water Quality 1617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC 27699-1617 Phone (919) 733-7015 Customer Service Internet: h2o.enr.state.nc.ustsulstormwater.html 512 N. Salisbury St. Raleigh, NC 27604 FAX (919) 733-9612 1-877-623-6749 An Equal OpportunitylAffirmabve Action Employer- 50% Recycled110% Post Consumer Paper STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES DIVISION OF WATER QUALITY GENERAL PERMIT NO. NCG020000 CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE No. NCG020029 STORMWATER AND PROCESS WASTEWATER DISCHARGES NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM In compliance with the provision of North Carolina General Statute 143-215.1, other lawful standards and regulations promulgated and adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended, Martin Marietta Materials Inc is hereby authorized to discharge stormwater and to operate treatment systems and discharges associated with mine dewatering wastewater and process wastewater from a facility located at East Alamance Quarry 1666 Hwy 49 N Haw River Alamance County to receiving waters designated as Boyds Creek, a class C;NSW stream in the Cape Fear River Basin in accordance with the effluent limitations, monitoring requirements, and other conditions set forth in Parts I, II, III, IV, V, and VI of General Permit No. NCG020000 as attached. This certificate of coverage shall become effective February 7, 2005. This Certificate of Coverage shall remain in effect for the duration of the General Permit. Signed this day February 7, 2005 for Alan W. Klimek, P.E., Director Division of Water Quality By Authority of the Environmental Management Commission Pormit: Owner - Facility: f Inspoction Date: Inspection Type: Compliance Evaluation Reason for Visit: Routine Stormwater Pollution Preventlon Plan Yes No NA NE Does the site have a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a General Location (USGS) map? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a "Narrative Description of Practices"? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a detailed site map including outfall locations and drainage areas? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a list of significant spills occurring during the past 3 years? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Has the facility evaluated feasible alternatives to current practices? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the facility provide all necessary secondary containment? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a BMP summary? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a Spill Prevention and Response Plan (SPRP)? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a Preventative Maintenance and Good Housekeeping Plan? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the facility provide and document Employee Training? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a list of Responsible Party(s)? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Is the Plan reviewed and updated annually? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Does the Plan include a Stormwater Facility Inspection Program? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Has the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan been implemented? ❑ ❑ ❑ '❑ Comment: Qualitative Monitoring Yes No NA NE Has the facility conducted its Qualitative Monitoring semi-annually? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Comment: Analytical Monitoring Yes No NA NE Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Has the facility conducted its Analytical monitoring from Vehicle Maintenance areas? ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ Comment: Permit and Outfalls Yes No NA NE # is a copy of the Permit and the Certificate of Coverage available at the site? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ # Were all outfalis observed during the inspection? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ # If the facility has representative outfall status, is it properly documented by the Division? ❑ 1100 # Has the facility evaluated all illicit (non stormwater) discharges? 0 000 Comment: