510039_Compliance Evaluation Inspection_20191024

r"; fvl 041tl
WDivision of Water Resources
Facility Number 5 - ® 0 Division of Soil and Water Conservation
0 Other Agency
le of Visit: E3 Compliance Inspection 0 Operation Review 0 Structure Evaluation 0 Technical Assistance
tson for Visit: ORoutine 0 Complaint 0 Follow-up 0 Referral 0 Emergency 0 Other 0 Denied Access
Date of Visit: Arrival Time: f rya y� Departure Time: ;a County: 1hato_ Region:
Farm Name: P/1/m nwnnr V—.;I.
Owner Name: C s9i f'e Phone:
Mailing Address:
Physical Address:
Facility Contact: , jj CQS� '+/ ° Tide:
Onsite Representative:
Certified Operator: S
Back-up Operator:
Location of Farm:
Swine
Wean to Finish
Wean to Feeder
Feeder to Finish
Farrow to Wean
Farrow to Feeder
Farrow to Finish
Boars
Other
Other
Latitude:
Phone:
Integrator: 11J
Certification Number: _I $ g $a
Certification Number:
Design Current Design Current
Capacity Pop. Wet Poultry Capacity Pop.
Layer
Nan -La er
Discharees and Stream Impacts
Pou
Non-L
Pullets
Other
Design Current
Longitude:
Design Current
Cattle Capacity Pop.
Dai Cow
Dai Calf
Dai Heifer
Dry Cow
,Non -Dairy
Beef Stocker
Beef Feeder
Beef Brood Cow
1. Is any discharge observed from any part of the operation'' ❑ Yes CR No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Discharge originated at: ❑ Structure ❑ Application Field ❑ Other:
a. Was the conveyance man-made? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
b_ Did the discharge reach waters of the State? (If yes, notify DWR) []Yes ❑ No [:]NA ❑ NE
c. What is the estimated volume that reached waters of the State (gallons)?
d, Does the discharge bypass the waste management system? (If yes, notify DWR) [:]Yes ❑ No [:]NA []NE
2. Is there evidence of a past discharge from any part of the operation? ❑ Yes S No ❑ NA ❑ NE
3. Were there any observable adverse impacts or potential adverse impacts to the waters ❑ Yes [g No ❑ NA ❑ NE
of the State other than from a discharge?
Page 1 of 3 21412015 Continued

Facili Number: - Date of Inspection:
Waste Collection & Treatment
4. Is storage capacity (structural plus storm storage plus heavy rainfall) less than adequate? ❑ Yes 12 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
a. If yes, is waste level into the structural freeboard? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Structure I Structure 2 Structure 3 Structure 4 Structure 5 Structure 6
Identifier: �, I NPW
Spillway?:
Designed Freeboard (in):
Observed Freeboard (in):
5. Are there any immediate threats to the integrity of any of the structures observed? ❑ Yes to No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(i.e., large trees, severe erosion, seepage, etc.)
6. Are there structures on -site which are not properly addressed and?or managed through a ❑ Yes 4 No ❑ NA ❑ NE
waste management or closure plan?
If any orquestions 4-6 were answered yes, and the situation poses an immediate public health or environmental threat, notify DWR
7. Do any of the structures need maintenance or improvement? ❑ Yes Q No ❑ NA ❑ NE
8. Do any of the structures lack adequate markers as required by the permit? ❑ Yes El No ❑ NA ❑ NE
(not applicable to roofed pits, dry stacks, and/or wet stacks)
9. Does any part of the waste management system other than the waste structures require ❑ Yes JZ No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
Waste Application
I0. Are there any required buffers, setbacks, or compliance alternatives that need ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
maintenance or improvement?
11. Is there evidence of incorrect land application? If yes, check the appropriate box below. ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Excessive Ponding ❑ Hydraulic Overload ❑ Frozen Ground ❑ Heavy Metals (Cu, Zn, etc.)
❑ PAN ❑ PAN > 10% or 10 lbs. ❑ Total Phosphorus ❑ Failure to Incorporate Manure/Sludge into Bare Soil
❑ Outside of Acceptable }Crop Window ❑ Evidence of Wind Drift ❑ Application Outside of Approved Area
12. Crop Type(s): Coln— 1i11S J ye� � QI" 7
13. Soil Type(s):
14. Do the receiving crops differ from those designated in the CAWMP? ❑ Yes to No ❑ NA ❑ NE
I5. Does the receiving crop and/or land application site need improvement? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
16. Did the facility fail to secure and/or operate per the irrigation design or wettable ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
acres determination?
17. Does the facility lack adequate acreage for land application?
18. Is there a lack of properly operating waste application equipment?
❑ Yes [Z No ❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Yes n No ❑ NA ❑ NE
Required Records & Documents
19. Did the facility fail to have the Certificate of Coverage & Permit readily available?
❑ Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
W NE
20. Does the facility fail to have all components of the CAWMP readily available? If yes, check
❑ Yes
CR No
❑ NA
❑ NE
the appropriate box.
❑ Wi1P []Checklists [:]Design ❑ Maps ❑ Lease Agreements
❑Other:
21. Does record keeping need improvement? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
IP Yes
❑ No
❑ NA
❑ NE
❑ Waste Application ❑ Weekly Freeboard JKWaste Analysis 0 Soil Analysis
❑ Waste Transfers
❑ Weather
Code
❑ Rainfall ❑ Stocking ❑ Crop Yield ❑ 120 Minute Inspections ❑ Monthly and I" Rainfall Inspections ❑ Sludge Survey
22. Did the facility fail to install and maintain a rain gauge?
❑ Yes
C2 No
❑ NA
❑ NE
23. If selected, did the facility fail to install and maintain rainbreakers on irrigation equipment?
❑ Yes
❑ No
0 NA
❑ NE
Page 2 of 3
21412015 Continued

Facili Number: Ijj Date of Inspection:
24. Did the facility fail to calibrate waste application equipment as required by the permit? ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
25. Is the facility out of compliance with permit conditions related to sludge? If yes, check ❑ Yes No ❑ NA ❑ NE
the appropriate box(es) below.
❑ Failure to complete annual sludge survey ❑ Failure to develop a POA for sludge levels
❑ Non -compliant sludge levels in any lagoon
List structure(s) and date of first survey indicating non-compliance:
26. Did the facility fail provide documentation of an actively certified operator in charge? ❑ Yes 6a No ❑ NA ❑ NE
27. Did the facility fail to secure a phosphorus loss assessments (PLAT) certification? ❑ Yes ❑ No NA ❑ NE
Other Issues
28. Did the facility fail to properly dispose of dead animals with 24 hours and/or document ❑ Yes EjNo ❑ NA ❑ NE
and report mortality rates that were higher than normal?
29. At the time of the inspection did the facility pose an odor or air quality concern?
❑ Yes
N No
❑ NA ❑ NE
If yes, contact a regional Air Quality representative immediately.
30. Did the facility fail to notify the Regional Office of emergency situations as required by the
❑ Yes
Dfl No
❑ NA ❑ NE
permit? (i.e., discharge, freeboard problems, over -application)
31. Do subsurface tile drains exist at the facility? If yes, check the appropriate box below.
❑ Yes
F;Uf No
❑ NA ❑ NE
❑ Application Field ❑ Lagoon/Storage Pond ❑ Other:
32. Were any additional problems noted which cause non-compliance of the permit or CAWMP?
❑ Yes
M No
❑ NA ❑ NE
33. Did the Reviewer/inspector fail to discuss review/inspection with an on -site representative?
❑ Yes
[21 No
DNA ❑ NE
34. Does the facility require a follow-up visit by the same agency?
❑ Yes
W No
❑ NA ❑ NE
Comments (refer to question #): Explain any YES answers and/or any additional recommendations or any other comments.
Use drawings or facility to better explain situations (use additional pages as necessary).
)&-sial wfl) nP>FtC W ri CQ' hf170)) ed y 4he -oi � o?oal,
a� = sri►slxue s due, b n a�x , ord areret,;ar aOIS t
1l��rrl pan Sion
ado a � U
year,
a t- Woj,�_ Arta y SP1
b a �apeak sam lcr, , K o RPle- s a eve ref d t r i nr�le . IUo-h"�e
117119 0P c1 o30 VI " rr of --
I W0a 3 c c�e of Ada wAI �be i6sutok- PAW' }��e r
�� aNlEg y �, �
evmclae ir peh wed ut
p?o so i j 4e�- I�, Lajt�e d&le % ao1�a P x«lao bu-f -rvas clue on a -E�eld�,
new � yew
15 %eAe, chi ©,j 4410-er 11 Wd5 OVef,I
TIQ��e al+a2 Orr(y of 0:�)jed,
riium har beeq dgprvlct4 since, aoir , Me4 df le,,j+ ) iyr/) fp)WM
olt°'0f01n 5 � �' fo Qn v �4 �s �c i„t pi rAjgvokvAya-f `b
GW ry rat rwt -C m.
rst��`���`� `n�oaCsh`��2 4 tvt�e 1 oc�r�,
D� lid IS uP re ,, t)ue/ 0- N 4-PC- aj, qj
RevieweHnspectorName: Phone:-ilq2) "40y
Revieweri Inspector Signature: 6u Date:
Page 3 of 3 21412015