19991033 Ver 1_COMPLETE FILE_19990914

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (EA) AND
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT (FONSI)
PLANTATION CANAL
PROPOSED MAINTENANCE DREDGING PROJECT
TOWN OF RIVER BEND, NORTH CAROLINA
' JULY 129 1999

PREPARED FOR:
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND
' NATURAL RESOURCES (NCDENR) CLEARINGHOUSE

I

PREPARED BY:
Mid-Atlantic Associates, P.A.
' 5041 New Centre Drive, Suite 214
Wilmington, NC 28403
' [phone]

ID-ATLANTIC
' M
ASSOCIATES, P. A.
Engineering & Environmental Solutions
Mid-Atlantic Associates, P.A.
Environmental Assessment (EA) and
Finding of No Insignificant Impact (FONSI)
t Plantation Canal
Proposed Maintenance Dredging Project
Town of River Bend, North Carolina
July 12, 1999 -_--

' 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
1.1 Description of Project Area
1. 1.1 Setting
' 1.1.2 NC DWQ, WQS Surface Freshwater Classifications
Used in North Carolina - Adjacent Waterbodies
1.2 Description of Proposed Action
' 1.3 Benefits of Proposed Project
2.0 NEED FOR PROPOSED PROJECT
'
3.0 ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS
3.1 No Action
3
2 O
tion as Pro
osed
.
p
p
' 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES
4.1 Changes in Land Use
4.2 Wetlands
4.3 Prime or Unique Agricultural Lands
' 4.4 Public Lands
4.5 Scenic and Recreational Areas
4.6 Areas of Archeological or Historical Value
' 4.7 Air Quality
4.8 Groundwater Quality
' 4.9 Noise Levels
4.10 Water Supplies
4.11 Shellftsh/Fish Habitats/Wildlife Habitats
(Endangered/Threatened Species)
4.12 Introduction of Toxic Substances
4.13 Eutrophication of Receiving Waters
' 4.14 Hydraulics
4.15 Sediment Sampling
4.16 Water Quality Sampling
5.0 MITIGATIVE MEASURES
' 6.0 FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT (FONSI)
7.0 SIGNATURES AND SEALS
PAGE
2
2
3
4
5
6
6
7
8
8
8
8
9
9
9
10
11
11
11
11
12
12
13
15
Mid-Atlantic Associates, P.A.
T.O.C. 1

Mid-Atlantic Associates, P.A.
Environmental Assessment (EA) and
Finding of No Insignificant Impact (FONSI)
Plantation Canal
Proposed Maintenance Dredging Project
Town of River Bend, North Carolina
.July 12, 1999
PAGE
8.0 REFERENCES
FIGURES
FIGURE I
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 5
APPENDICES
APPENDIX I
APPENDIX II
APPENDIX III
APPENDIX IV
APPENDIX V
APPENDIX VI
APPENDIX VII
APPENDIX VIII
16
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC QUADRANGLE
POLLOCKSVILLE, NC
SITE PLAN
CANAL PLAN (1 OF 3)
CANAL PLAN (2 OF 3)
CANAL PLAN (3 OF 3)
PHOTODOCUMENTATION
AERIAL PHOTOGRAMMETRY
LETTER: WAYNE MCDEVITT
NCDENR DWR
WETLAND SURVEY
LETTER: NC WILDLIFE RESOURCES
COMMISSION
LETTER: NC NATURAL HERITAGE
LETTER: US FISH AND WILDLIFE
SERVICE
EASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL
SEDIMENT SAMPLING REPORT
Mid-Atlantic Associates. P.A.
T.O.C. 2

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (EA) AND
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT (FONSI)
' PLANTATION CANAL
PROPOSED MAINTENANCE DREDGING PROJECT
TOWN OF RIVER BEND, NORTH CAROLINA
I.July 12, 1999
1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
' Mid-Atlantic Associates, P.A. (formerly GulfStream Environmental, Inc.) was
retained by Mr. William C. Raybon, P.E. of Raybon Engineering P.A., to perform
an Environmental Assessment (EA) on the proposed Plantation Canal
' maintenance-dredging project within the Town of River Bend, North Carolina.
The proposed maintenance project is classified under the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act (NCEPA), as outlined in NCAC T 15A: 01 C.0504 (4n):
' (7/31/96), as a Non-Major Management Activity. Per this designation, the
"dredging of existing navigation channels and basins to originally approved
' specifications, provided that the spoil is placed in existing and approved high
ground disposal areas" does not warrant the preparation of an EA. However, this
EA has been commissioned to document potential environmental impacts that
' may arise during the execution of the proposed project, in an effort to mitigate
these potential factors. The purpose of the EA -- as directed by NCAC T15A:
01 C.0100-.0500 (7.31.96) and included in the Guidelines for the preparation of an
' EA -- is to provide a decision making tool for state agencies in determining the
potential environmental impacts of planned projects, and to make the
determination of whether an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is necessary
' (Guidelines EA-1).
The scope of work performed during this assessment has included (1) the review
' of pertinent technical documentation, (2) the review of available aerial
photography, (3) the consultation of regulatory officials with the United States
Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the North Carolina (NC) Division of Marine
' Fisheries (DMF), the NC Division of Coastal Management (DCM), the NC
Division of Water Quality (DWQ), Water Quality Section (WQS), the NC
Division of Water Resources (DWR), the North Carolina Wildlife Resources
' Commission (NCWRC), and the NC Natural Heritage Program, and (4) the
review of the proposed engineering design, to date.
' Mid-Atlantic has performed this assessment in accordance with the proposal
entitled "Proposal/Cost to Prepare an Environmental Assessment (EA)," dated
November 10, 1998, and the Guidelines for the preparation of an EA/FONSI. The
' activities performed during this study were authorized by Mr. William C. Raybon,
P.E., on behalf of the Town of River Bend, in the Mid-Atlantic Proposal
Acceptance Contract executed on December 10, 1998.
1
Mid-Atlantic Associates, P.A.
' Page 1

I

I

EA/FONSI
July 12, 1999
1.1 Description of Project Area
A USGS Topographic Quadrangle (7.5 Minute) depicting the site region
has been provided as Figure 1, a Site Plan has been provided as Figure 2.
and details of the canal system have been provided as Figures 3-5. Site
photographs collected during the site reconnaissance are provided in
Appendix 1. Aerial photographs of the area have been furnished in
Appendix 11 for the years of 1968, 1989, and 1993.
1.1.1 Setting
The Town of River Bend is located in Craven County, within the coastal
plain physiographic province of North Carolina, approximately 5.0 miles
west of New Bern, North Carolina (Figure 1). The corporate limits of the
town are bound to the north by Highway 17; however it should be noted
that the Springdale subdivision, Hidden Oaks (Extra-Territorial
Jurisdiction (ETJ)), and Deerfield Phase III (ETJ), are located north of
Hwy. 17 (Figure 2). The southern boundary of the town abuts the Trent
River, which adjoins Plantation Canal. Plantation Canal, its branches.
headbasin, and Island Lake are backwaters of the Trent River.
Plantation Canal is an artificial waterway constructed in 1974, during the
initial development of River Bend (Figures 3-5/Photographs 1,3,4.5,6).
Dredging of the freshwater canal was performed in the location of a
former creek bed adjacent to Samuel's Branch in Rocky Run, a division of
Hayward Creek along the eastern boundary of the property limits (see
Aerial Photographs). The original CAMA Major Permit Application was
not available at the time of this report. The project included the
excavation of a watercourse through wetland swamp areas, including the
construction of a marina basin, main canal course, drainage/retention
ponds, and secondary canals. Project excavation limits included the
dredging of the marina basin, consisting of approximately 4.0 acres, and
the main channel connecting to the Trent River, stretching approximately
1.0 mile (Report 5). Initial project design criteria involved the excavation
of a main channel with a surface width of ±100.0 ft. and a center channel
with a bottom width of ±50.0 ft., at a minimum centerline depth of 6.0 ft.
below mean low water (MLW) (Report 5). Sediment accumulation and
shoaling within Plantation Canal has been caused by a number of factors
consisting of sedimentation, siltation, and sloughing of the unstabilized
north bank (in the main channel).
The canal system was originally designed to (1) provide
boating/recreational access to the waterfront community of River Bend.
and (2) serve as the central drainage feature for the development.
Plantation Canal, the associated secondary canals, and the retention
Mid-Atlantic
EANFONSI
.July 12, 1999
' ponds/drainage ditches throughout the town are interconnected, and
function to facilitate proper drainage regimes, as intended by the
' developer (Photographs 2,5,6,7). The canal acts as the receiving body for
directed flow and sheet flow throughout the town limits. The canal's
utility as a drainage feature is absolutely necessary (Photograph 5).
' Circulation within the canal system is driven by precipitation, runoff, and
wind tides. Lunar tidal influence is minimal and saline intrusion into the
canal system is limited to the confluence point of Plantation Canal and the
' Trent River.
1.1.2 North Carolina Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section
' Surface Freshwater Classifications Used in North Carolina -
Adjacent Waterbodies
' The NC DWQ, WQS has developed water quality classifications for
surface freshwaters in North Carolina. These surface water classifications
"are designations applied to surface water bodies, such as streams, rivers,
' and lakes, which define the best uses to be protected within these waters
and carry out with them an associated set of water quality standards to
protect those uses" (Classifications 1). The water bodies located adjacent
' to the Town of River Bend carry the following classifications
(Classifications and NCAC T15A: 02B .0100):

Trent River (SB Sw NSW)-- The portion of the Trent River that runs
adjacent to River Bend is located in the NEUI 1 sub-basin is indicated
by index number 27-101-(31) and is located on map number G30S W5.
This run of the Trent is classified as SB (saltwaters protected for
primary recreation which includes swimming on a frequent or
organized basis and all SC uses, including secondary recreation,
fishing, aquatic life including propagation and survival, and wildlife),
with supplemental classifications of Sw (swamp waters which have
low velocities and other natural characteristics which are different
from adjacent streams) and NSW (nutrient sensitive waters subject to
growths of microscopic or macroscopic vegetation requiring
limitations on nutrient inputs).
• Rocky Run (C Sw NSW) - This tributary of Hayward Creek is
located in the NEU 11 sub-basin, is indicated by index number 27-101-
35-1, and is located on map number G30S W6. Rocky Run is
classified as C (freshwaters protected for secondary recreation, fishing,
aquatic life including propagation and survival, and wildlife), with
supplemental classifications of Sw (swamp waters) and NSW (nutrient
sensitive waters).
• Hayward Creek (C Sw NSW) - This branch of Hayward Creek is
located in the NEU 11 sub-basin, is indicated by index number 27- 10 1 -
Mid-Atlaotic Associates, P.A.
Pate 3

EANONSI
July 12,1999
' 35, and is located on map number G30SW3. Hayward Creek is
classified as C (freshwaters protected for secondary recreation, fishing,
aquatic life including propagation and survival, and wildlife), with
supplemental classifications of Sw (swamp waters) and NSW (nutrient
sensitive waters).
' • Plantation Canal - Plantation Canal is not listed within the
classification schedule. This manmade canal is therefore incorporated
' by reference to the adjacent stretch of the Trent River (SB Sw NSW).
• Samuel's Branch - Samuel's Branch is not listed within the
classification schedule. This tributary is therefore incorporated by
reference because it is a branch of Hayward Creek and Rocky Run (C
Sw NSW).
'
1.2 Description of Proposed Action
' The objective of this project is to perform routine maintenance dredging
on Plantation Canal to return the watercourse to its original permitted
elevation and condition. Because this project involves the maintenance of
a pre-existing channel, and does not entail the expansion of the waterway,
or dredging in areas outside the original footprint of the canal system, it
qualifies as a Non-Major Activity with respect to the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act. This classification is an exemption from the
requirement to prepare environmental documentation, such as this EA.
' As proposed, this maintenance project will involve the removal of
approximately 42,000 yds3 of material, consisting of some surficial silt
material, but mostly comprised of sand throughout the entire length of
' Plantation Canal and the secondary canals. Dredging will be effected with
a hydraulic dredge and decanter/staging barge. Dredge spoils will be
placed in one of three upland disposal areas designated for use in this
' project (Photographs 8-10). The location of the three proposed disposal
areas is shown. on Figure 2. Maintenance dredging will be performed on
the central navigation channel only, and will not cover the entire canal
width. Current profile elevations are noted in the hydrographic survey
generated by Raybon Engineering, P.A. The design standard for the
' channel will provide a channel width of approximately 30.0-ft., and a
minimum centerline channel depth of approximately 6.0 ft. below MLW.
' The Town of River Bend has been awarded $292,000 in financial
assistance to subsidize this project. The project has been endorsed by
NCDENR based on its merit for improvements to existing water quality
within the system. Per the 9.22.97 correspondence from Wayne McDevitt,
Secretary of the Department of the Environment and Natural Resources
(NCDENR), the grant has been approved on behalf of the DWR and
' Mid-Atlantic Associates, P.A.
Page 4

Ci

EA/FONSI
July 12, 1999
NCDENR to improve navigation, facilitate stormwater drainage, and
benefit fish habitats (Appendix III).
1.3 Benefits of Proposed Project
The maintenance dredging of Plantation Canal and the associated
secondary canals will provide multiple benefits to every medium affected
by the project, whether water quality, fish, wildlife, or human interests.
As noted above in Section 1.2, a financial assistance package has been
approved for this maintenance project by the NCDENR, because the
"removal of sediment and shoals from the Plantation Canal will improve
navigation for the citizens of River Bend and the boating public,"
and "will also improve fish habitat and storm water drainage" (McDevitt).
In addition, representatives from the North Carolina Division of Coastal
Management (Mr. Scott Jones) have expressed their support for this
project, due to increased flushing and an improvement in water quality
resulting in decreased aquatic vegetation growth (green algae and blue-
green algae).
The community and citizens of River
associated with improved navigation and i
the maintenance dredging of River Ben
uniform bottom elevation throughout
navigation throughout the canal system.
entail the removal of accumulated sedime
expense of the respective property owner
that may have been impeded due to sh
CAMA permit application should reflec
from this activity.
Bend will realize the benefits
ecreation potential. In doing so,
1's watercourses will provide a
the central channel, to ease
Additionally, the project may
nts in private boat basins (at the
>) and enable personal moorings
)cling and sedimentation. The
t which properties will benefit
Potential economic benefits also present
maintenance project. Improved navigatic
yield the marina more viable and offer the
increased slip rental, and allow for the I
drafts, which are currently restricted from
Other benefits may include using the
suitable fill material for municipal pro
elevation of several low-lying/frequently-f
parks, ballfields, and access roads. These
unusable following periods of heavy rain.
is an increase in property values due to rest
themselves as a result of the
n within the canal system will
)ossibility of transient dockage,
assage of vessels with greater
travelling through the channel.
iredged sediments to provide
lects including increasing the
ooded public use areas, such as
areas are often impassable and
A final benefit that could occur
gyration of the canal.
Mid-Atlantic Associates, P.A.
Page 5

2.0

NEED FOR PROPOSED PROJECT
EANONSI
July 12,1999
The need for the maintenance dredging of Plantation Canal has been recognized
by the citizens of River Bend, the River Bend Town Council, the Waterways
Advisory Board, and the regulatory community, as documented by their support
of this project.
As documented above in Section 1.3, the need for this project arises from an
improvement in water quality, circulation, flushing, and fish habitats, the
reduction of aquatic plant growth, the benefits to the local economy and land use
potential, and the importance of the watercourse as the central drainage feature of
the town.
The River Bend community was originally developed around this
navigational/drainage feature. By dredging the watercourses, the health of the
entire system will be augmented.
Maintenance dredging of the canal system will effectively (1) improve water
quality, (2) benefit fishery habitats and spawning areas, (3) improve circulation
and flushing within the canals by removing accumulated sediments, (4) reduce the
effects of eutrophication, i.e. aquatic vegetation propagation, (5) maintain the
canal as the central drainage feature within the town, and (6) provide suitable fill
materials to enhance public-use areas.
3.0 ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS
In considering the maintenance dredging project, as proposed, one other
alternative is also available - a no action alternative. Analysis of this proposed
alternative is provided hereafter in Section 3.1.
3.1 No Action
' The option proposed as "No Action" will facilitate continual degradation
of the environmental condition of the canal system. The eutrophication of
receiving waters will continue to foster aquatic vegetation growth with the
' introduction of nitrates and phosphates, as noted in the study entitled
"Water Quality Monitoring of the Waterways of River Bend, NC May
1994 to April 1995," dated April 12, 1995. This perpetuation of
green/blue-green algae in the spring and summer months will ultimately
cause a degradation of water quality, resulting in low dissolved oxygen
content, and conditions possibly leading to a fish-kill. Without increased
circulation and flushing of the watercourse, combined with continual
sedimentation, shoaling, and nutrient loading, the Plantation Canal system
may ultimately become a tributary unable to support normal aquatic life
' functions.
I Mid-Atlantic Associates, P.A.
Page 6
EA/FONSI
July 12,1999
Excess nitrogen
enters the water.
Fish die because
of lack of oxygen.
Oxygen level in
the water drops.
Nitrogen fertilizes algae
and make it grow.
Algae uses oxygen
for respiration (at night)
and decay.
Detail 1
Source: Neuse River Riparian Area Rule
http://h2o.etir, state. nc.us/nps/cheat-s3.htm
Additionally, the "No Action" alternative will prevent free flow exchange
between the Trent River and Plantation Canal. This prohibition will also
result in water quality degradation, which will adversely impact
anadromous fishery spawning (Bream, Striper, Losid, Blue Back Herring,
and American Shad) and habitat areas (Striped Bass).
' In summary, the rate of degradation to the canal eco-system is anticipated
to occur exponentially. Eutrophication and water quality degradation will
be exacerbated without improvements to hydraulic flow regime of the
' system. The "No Action" alternative is not a viable solution for
improving the current declining quality of surface water in the canal.
' 3.2 Option as Proposed
By performing the maintenance-dredging project, as proposed,
' improvements to water quality, fishery habitats, and spawning areas will
be realized. Additionally, the canal system will remain open for navigable
' use and recreation by the public. Further, the maintenance project will
facilitate the improvement of the canal as a drainage feature, as it was
originally designed. The multiple benefits of this project, as discussed
' above in Sections 1.0 and 1.2, will all benefit property values throughout
the Town of River Bend, as they should appreciate as a function of the
canal improvement.
1
' Mid-Atlantic Associates, P.A.
Page 7
EANONSI
July 12,1999
' 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES
' 4.1 Changes in Land Use

' Changes in land use will result in the preparation of the dredge spoil
upland disposal/staging areas. These areas will be cleared and diked to
accommodate all materials generated during the project. Ultimately, the
dredged materials will be relocated to provide fill in low-lying/frequently
' flooded areas. This measure will provide beneficial use of the material,
and will improve these public-use areas. Following the removal of the
dredged sediments from the disposal areas, the impoundments will be
' restored to their original conditions, and will be seeded to prevent erosion
of surficial sediments.
' Additionally, any disturbance caused to the canal bank during dredging
o
erations will be restored before
roject com
letion
p
p
p
.
' 4.2 Wetlands
According to. the proposed project engineering design, no impacts to
' wetlands will occur. Dredged materials will be placed in existing upland
disposal areas only. No dredging, filling, or alteration of wetlands will
occur during the project, as only the original canal will be maintained.
'
One of the disposal areas selected will however, abut a USACOE Section
404 wetlands area. The wetlands in this locale have been properly
' delineated and will not be impacted by dike construction. The location of
this wetland area is shown in Appendix IV.
' 4.3 Prime or Unique Agricultural Lands
No prime or unique agricultural lands were identified as part of the scope
' of this project.
4.4 Public Lands
' Maintenance dredging of the canal system within River Bend is a
r?pscsen
significant improvement to the public trust waters constituting the channel.
' No other public lands - national forests, seashores, corridors, easements,
or reserves - will be impacted as a result of this project.
' 4.5 Scenic and Recreational Areas
' As discussed previously in Sections 1.3 and 4.1, recreational areas will
benefit from this project. First, several areas of low elevation, which are
frequently flooded, will be provided with suitable sand fill from the
' Mid-Atlantic Associates, P.A.
Page 8
1
u

0
EAMONSI
July 12, 1999
maintenance-dredging project. This me,
prevent future flooding caused as a rest
Second, the navigable waterways within
improved to allow for unobstructed trave
dredging the canal system, thus imprc
habitats, recreational fishing opportunitii
of the canal system will improve the he
the waterway.
ure will raise the elevation and
t of intensive rainfall episodes.
he Town of River Bend will be
by the public. Additionally, by
ring .water quality and fishery
will be augmented. Dredging
lth and recreational viability of
4.6 Areas of Archaeological or Historical Value
No areas of archaeological or historical value have been identified during
this assessment. Additional research will be performed to confirm the
cultural or archaeological significance of the proposed disposal sites, for
inclusion in the final document.
4.7 Air Quality
Potential impacts to air quality, as a result of the project operations, are
not anticipated. No emissions of primary or secondary sources are
proposed. Some sediments may become airborne following drying in the
upland disposal impoundments. Impacts as a result of these effects should
be mitigated by the design height of the impoundment structures.
4.8 Groundwater Quality
No impacts to groundwater quality were identified during this assessment.
4.9 Noise Levels
Noise levels, both sub-aqueous and ambient, may exceed normal
background levels during the execution of the project. This is primarily
due to noise caused by the mechanical dredge apparatus. These levels are
not expected to pose adverse effects to the surrounding environments and
are characteristic of routine dredging projects conducted throughout the
region.
4.10 Water Supplies
r
No direct impacts to water supplies are expected to occur as a result of this
project. The NC Division of Water Resources has expressed their
approval of the project, as resulted in the approval of the financial
assistance package discussed in Section 1.2.
' Mid-Atlantic Associates, P.A.
Page 9
C
I
I

EA/FONSI
July 12,1999
4.11 Shellfish/Fish Habitats/Wildlife Habitats - Endangered/Threatened
Species (NC Wildlife Resources Commission, NC Division of Marine Fisheries, NC
Natural Heritage Commission, US Fish and Wildlife Service)
• According to Brad Hammers, Biologist with the North Carolina
Wildlife Resources Commission, potential impacts of the
maintenance-dredging project stem from sedimentation, impacts to
fishery habitats, and possible interruption of normal spawning cycles.
A letter from Mr. Hammers and the NC Wildlife Resources
Commission is included in Appendix V. Throughout the course of
discussions with Mr. Hammers, and included in the letter from him,
Mr. Hammers noted that the Striped Bass Fishery utilizes portions of
the Trent River adjacent to Plantation Canal for winter habitat;
however he was unaware of their use of Plantation Canal as such, but
indicated that it is a possibility. Additionally, Mr. Hammers indicated
that the dredging should be performed in the winter months to avoid
impacts to Bream and Striped Bass spawning cycles in the vicinity.
These spawning periods occur during a moratorium from April 1-
September 30. Additionally, according to Mr. Hammers, "fisheries
resources in this area or adjacent areas provide a very valuable
recreational fishery and include striped bass, largemouth bass, bluegill,
redear sunfish, and pumpkinseed" (Letter dated February 5, 1999).
• Mr. Jim Francesconi, Fisheries Biologist with the NC Division of
Marine Fisheries, indicated that Plantation Canal area was not under
the jurisdiction of the agency. Mr. Francesconi stated, however, that
this region was not a primary nursery area, but it is a spawning area for
Stripers, Losids, Blue Back Herring, and American Shad.
• According to Ms. Susan Giles, Information Specialist with the North
Carolina Natural Heritage Program, "The NC Natural Heritage
Program does not have records of high quality natural communities,
rare species, or Significant Natural Heritage Areas at or within a 1.0
mile radius of the site of the proposed maintenance dredging of the
Plantation Canal, Town of River Bend, NC" (letter 1.14.99). The
letter documenting these findings has been included in Appendix VI.
• According to Mr. Ken Graham, Biologist with the US Fish and
Wildlife Service, endangered terrestrial species have been highlighted
and located in Craven County by the Department of the Interior,
however, this has not been done for aquatic species. Mr. Graham
referred the inquiry to the NC Natural Heritage Program, as referenced
above. Mr. Graham noted the sighting of one Manatee and one
Leatherback Sea Turtle, both discovered at the mouth of the Trent
River within the last ten years. No sightings have been confirmed in
the area of the Trent adjacent to Plantation Canal or within the canal.
Mr. Graham stated that the likelihood of encountering either of these
species within Plantation Canal was "very low."
I Mid-Atlantic Associates, P.A.
Page 10
EA/FONSI
July 12, 1999
i A letter from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has been included in
Appendix VII.
' 4.12 Introduction of Toxic Substances
' The likelihood of the introduction of toxic substances during the dredging
project is very low, and is limited to the potential release of liquid
petroleum hydrocarbons associated with refueling and normal operation
' procedures of the dredge.
A characterization of sediments quality was performed in March of 1999.
' Sediment samples were collected by Eastern Environmental in eleven
locations through the entire length of the canal. Samples were analyzed
for Oil & Grease as well as the RCRA primary metals. Oil & Grease
' concentrations were detected above the regulatory limit of 250 mg/kg in
six of the 11 stations sampled. The firm conducting the sampling has
attributed this occurrence to naturally occurring organics. None of the
' RCRA metals analyzed exceeded regulatory limits. A copy of the
sampling report is contained in Appendix VIII.
' 4.13 Eutrophication of Receiving Waters
The eutrophication of receiving waters is already a current phenomenon
within the Plantation Canal system. Mitigative measures to address this
problem are further detailed in Section 5.0. Additional nutrient loading is
not expected to occur as a result of this project.
' 4.14 Hydraulics
' Maintenance dredging of the channel will increase the cross-sectional area
of the channel, thus increasing circulation and flushing. This
improvement between the exchange of waters between the Trent River and
Plantation Canal, however, will not result in increased water levels within
the canal during flood stages or storm events. Dredging should actually
result in the displacement of floodwaters during these episodes.
4.15 Sediment Sampling
' Sampling of proposed dredged sediments has been performed by Eastern
Environmental. A report documenting the results of the sampling event
has been included in Appendix VIII. As noted in the report,
concentrations of TCLP RCRA Metals were not detected above the
regulatory action levels in any of the 11 samples. However,
' concentrations of Oil & Grease were detected above regulatory action
levels in six of the 11 samples. Eastern Environmental attributed the
presence of these compounds to "Naturally occurring oils from both macro
' Mid-Atlandc Associates, P.A.
Page 11
i
' EA/FONSI
July 12,1999
and micro plant and animal remains" found in these "highly organic
bottom ...swampy sediments" (March 16, 1999).
' 4.16 Water Quality Sampling
No water quality sampling has been performed as of the date of this report.
' 5.0 MITIGATIVE MEASURES
The Town of River Bend was designed around an interconnected series of
' drainage ditches, retention ponds, and finger canals, all of which flow to
Plantation Canal and eventually to the Trent River. River Bend has, and
continues to move forward in a pro-active manner to address sensitive
' environmental issues within and around the Plantation Canal system. Presently,
the town has implemented measures to mitigate the effects of sediment influx,
nutrient loading (eutrophication), and the introduction of toxic substances, via
' stormwater runoff, into the receiving waters of the canal system and ultimately
the Trent and Neuse Rivers. The Town has been awarded a financial assistance
package for the .implementation of a Wetlands Enhancement Program from the
' NC Water Resources Planning Section. This grant was provided to execute a
water resources development project, as outlined further below.
' To date, the Town of River Bend has installed aerating fountains in the retention
ponds to increase circulation, and has also implemented a Wetlands Enhancement
Program in two areas (Photographs 2 and 7). First as detailed in Photograph 2,
the Enhancement Program involved the construction of wetlands in one of the
retention ponds (adjacent to Hwy. 17). Since this pond is located near the head of
the drainage system, this vegetative filter serves to reduce sediment, nutrient, and
' toxic material loading from the area around Highway 17, and adjacent
neighborhoods, to the receiving waters. Vegetative swales were also constructed
around the perimeter of this pond to serve as filters for surficial runoff. Second, a
' series of vegetative filters/ wetlands will be constructed within a drainage ditch
that empties into the pond/canal system (Photograph 7). This ditch is located at a
topographic low point along Plantation Drive, which acts as the receiving drain
for an upgradient neighborhood.
With respect to future mitigative measures, the Town of River Bend proposes to
' first ; develop a "Nutrient Management Plan (NMP)" in accordance with the
requirements outlined in the Neuse Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management
Strategy, adopted by the North Carolina Environmental Management Commission
' on December 11, 1997. The objective of this NMP would be to reduce nutrient
loading (eutrophication), promote denitrification, prevent sedimentation, and
increase vegetative buffers within riparian corridors. Detail 2 outlines the
' composition of vegetative riparian corridors below. Secondly, as a proposed
mitigative measure, River Bend will schedule all dredging activities around
Mid-Atlantic Associates, P.A.
Page 12

EANONSI
July 12,1999
spawning moratoriums established by the relevant agencies, as discussed in
Section 4.11. A third mitigative measure to promote flushing and prevent
stagnant conditions would involve dredging the mouth of the canal as the deepest
point, with a general decrease in elevation to the end of the project. Additionally,
a sediment or silt curtain will be emplaced at the mouth of the canal to prevent
potential sedimentation in the receiving waters of the Trent River. And lastly, to
minimize potential effects from increased upland drainage, properly engineered
and constructed upland disposal areas will be utilized.

?6
'
{ ?
? ? ty c
? ? ?
Ir 3
SW Co if

YY

! {i{mot 1•S• LK { { L
{K L•L Li;.'M L.L
L. ?.; L•L .1.. S
L•LJ. ;K•?• K
L. ?.Li L?? YL
:!?}:!? ?!: L !•!•!•l.l:
;.ti.L LAC{ {.{
?•LKKK• L•?•L•L L•
1? Yti.L•L.L.L.L. L.L.~.L.Ly??
L•LiLK L+LKK• L Ki
:! li}:•L•L.L.L•L.L;L?LK?'

ir
Zara 2: 20 ft. Zane 1: 30 R.
20 ft. hr&edhamst 110 ft. undistuzbed
Detail 2
Source: Neuse River Riparian Area Rule
littp://112o.ciir.st,ite.ilc.iis/iips/cIicat-s3. Mill
6.0
FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT (FONSI)
As described in the Environmental Assessment above, the Town of River Bend
proposes to remove approximately 42,000 yds3 of a sand/silt material during the
routine maintenance dredging of the Plantation Canal system. All dredged
materials generated during this project will be placed in existing upland disposal
areas. The activities proposed herein are classified under the North Carolina
Environmental Policy Act (NCEPA), as outlined in NCAC T15A: 01C.0504 (4n):
(7/31/96), as a Non-Major Management Activity. Per this designation, the
"dredging of existing navigation channels and basins to originally approved
specifications, provided that the spoil is placed in existing and approved high
ground disposal areas" does not warrant the preparation of an EA. This EA has
been commissioned by the Town of River Bend to identify potential
environmental impacts that may arise during the execution of the proposed
project, in an effort to mitigate any potential adverse elements.
I Mid-Atlantic Associates, P.A.
Page 13
I EA/FONSI
July 12, 1999
I This project will not have significant adverse impacts on the state or quality of the
surrounding environment because the canal will only be maintained to its
' originally permitted condition. No expansion of the canal or extension of the
original footprint will be effected. This project will actually serve to benefit the
condition of the watercourse in its entirety through:
I • improvement of water quality
• improvement of fishery habitats
I • improvement of flushing/circulation
• establishment of a Nutrient Management Plan to implement riparian
corridor buffers, reduce nitrate/phosphate loading, promote
' denitrification, and prevent sedimentation
• improvement of navigation/recreation potential
• reduce oxygen-depleting algae
' River Bend has begun implementing a pro-active campaign to mitigate adverse
environmental impacts as they relate to runoff, eutrophication, sedimentation, and
' the vitality of the canal.
The Town of River Bend has already been awarded a financial assistance
' package, consisting of $292,000, to assist in the performance of this project. As
noted in the approval letter from Wayne McDevitt, Secretary of the NCDENR,
dated 9.22.97, "the removal of shoals from the Plantation Canal will improve
' navigation for the citizens of River Bend and the boating public" and "will also
improve fish habitat and storm water drainage." This support emphasizes the
approval of this project by the Department of Environment and Natural
' Resources, the Secretary, and the Division of Water Resources.
' No Environmental Impact Statement is anticipated for this project. This Finding
of No Significant Impact (FONSI) completes the environmental record for
presentation to the State Clearinghouse.

I Mid-Atlantic Associates, P.A.
Page 14

i
i
i
i
i
i
EA/FONSI
July 12,1999
7.0 SIGNATURES AND SEALS
- AAA
Rudy A. Smithwick, P.G.
Project Manager
P
C:\Mid-Atiantic\M[D-ATLANTIC\Projects\River Bend\EA\roport.doc
8.0 REFERENCES
Mid-Atlantic Associates, P.A.
Page 15

I
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 40, Parts 260-299.
EA/FONSI
July 12,1999
Details 1/2. "Meuse River Riparian Area Rule." hity//h-o.enr.state.nc.us/nps/cheat-s3.lit.
"Meuse Nutrient Sensitive Waters Management Strategy Rules." 12.11.97.
http:/ih2o.enr.state.nc.us/nps.iieuse.htni
' "Neuse River Riparian Area Rule." http://h2o.enr.state.nc.us/nps/clicat-sli.htm
North Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC) Title 15A, Subchapter 1C, Sections
' .0100-.0500, Conformity with North Carolina Environmental Policy Act.
01 March 1990 through 01 March 1993. http://h2o.enr. state.nc.us/Rules/Index.
hUnl
' North Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC) Title 15A, Subchapter 02B,
Sections .0100-.0500. "Surface Water Standards: Monitoring." 01 July
' 1988 through 15 June 1998.. http://h2o.enr.statc.nc.us/Rtiles/Indc.\.htnil
North Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC) Title 15A, Subchapter 02B, .0202.,
and Amendments to the Neuse River Nutrient Sensitive Waters
Management Strategy. 01 August 1998. http://h2o.ew.state.nc.us/nps/all2ncus
.htm
' North Carolina Administrative Code (NCAC) Title 15A, Subchapter 02B, .0315,
Neuse River Basin. http://li2o.enr.state.nc.tis/strcamclassAiN-dro/neuse.htm
' North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources (LETTER).
Mr. Wayne McDevitt, Secretary. September 22, 1997.
' North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (LETTER). Ms. Susan Giles. January
14, 1999.
' "North Carolina Neuse River Water Quality Conditions." United States
Geological Survey. http://s ig ldncrl .er.usgs.gov/gw/NeuseRiN,er.html
' "
"
Raybon Engineering, P.A.
Dredging (MAP).
5.11.98.
' "Report of the Plantation Canal Study Committee to the Town Council of River
Bend, North Carolina." July 1988.
' Suitt & Associates, P.A., Inc. "Town of River Bend, Corporate Limits &
Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (MAP)." 8.13.98.
"Surface Freshwater Classifications Used in North Carolina." North
' Mid-Atlantic Associates, P.A.
Page 16
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
EA/FONSI
July 12,1999
Carolina Division of Water Quality, Water Quality Section.
httg://h2o. enr. state. nc.us/hiquality. html
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. Soil Survey
of Craven County, North Carolina. 1989.
U.S. Geological Survey Topographic Quadrangle. Pollocksville, North Carolina.
1994.
"Water Quality Monitoring of the Waterways of River Bend, NC, May 1994 to
April 1995." Christian Waters c/o Mount Olive College. April 12, 1995.
Mid-Atiandc Associates, P.A.
Page 17
I

'00�

FIGURES
P,
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
P ' 27
ocky RuS% t 0\\ t zB: - -%Z
33LerWinp Strip
x
06
b az?` l_ 7
II _ 23 - .-?y..-
II
4 lI -_ /
i Q 25 f '- ' -, y?
t to,
c
C ,
TRENA 3?1 \ \? 2 - - "i?
•° 34 ' ? ?\ s ?' % - - OCR
con C;
V t .
x33 122
\ =
f. it f 1. 4?• ? fr
bl Tar
LaWill
i
u
J _ Unit
fill
I \ S "
o \ n
-t4. Z' -?4- _Mr: ,?.. ? y4- _?`• J tio -fie, ,u;.. - / \ 1 II
4Lt II
ki?
it
L 7 ,y
26
---
MID-ATLANTIC ASSOCIATES. P.A.
PROJMTI EA/FONSI
TITIEt USGS Topographic Quadran
le
FIGURE
Civil .Geotechnical *Environmental Town of River Bend g
Pollocksville, NC i
Wilmington, NC lae Na DA IT"' 1.20.99 1.24,000 nRnvN BY, ,TK.I 62C BYtIZAS
Town of River Bend
('nrnrnrate Limits &

Extra Territorial Jurisdiction
+
•
\J I? / j JJJ -
l 1_..
J-I
~` / ?! l _;? T `tom' V0101
\
,? I 1
r` 1. .. -7
%

r
DISPOSAL AREA 3
i

(IHAPHIC SCALIC
.-..---.. _.
1 m rccr i
' li ? ?<e ewi u
cP°?1
Legend _...r--- --- -
l Land Planning'- Surveying
34
Extra Territorial Jurisdiction P.O. BOX k28562
NE:W BERN, (2521633-2999
FAX: (252) 633-'9304 8-13-2
mmik
IDS
z
.t
\ .• r \
I.x
`
,
'ji
, i I 9s r \ ? i
1 u z '\ r o, ,, ` tl'? 1
N / /, ' 4-.c` Irv .\ ?,• ,4, ,rl II r'?II
tf tp, I,,l I I?r
I t I
I's
,
r~ I ` / ?? i '' 11 `•?
1 I
• .. '.V - e ? ?:' ill { r -, I
.
. ? f
1 I
1 ', I Ii I
I
/ F.` Ir f ?i I {I I I I ?` II? /// l IIII ? ? I(? i
1
. h /
-nj
C?? 3j
,
Z G?
,•
2 2
Dwo
log
I;w .? ? VGA°?'?• -;:??!. /. ? ?.i? 1•'.,
i
ri r r r r rr ?..:; ?? ¦?¦

/
r• ?Q
'
'ti

?`..
•` ,
.
r A r
rf
T ??
i
Y AA
•
`te'----""
,

J

t .`
mt, 4_3
r ?
Q
,,4r
,''tl 1rw'//'y ?.
d I `rte -,
kL? '1
,1? S 1
R/a^ °
r?/r0 21?G yW? ? N yNN
\, •"gyp !°1 G
------ - ------
I? ? g t?l??? /' ?,? ; ? ? ? /.? •? '.?,?, I.I.
i

VA

V'l
,
I ?
I I
I

,
I1
E `
i
t t t
i
i
i t

I

.
l y /

I j y \1 \ t,
I

, IS 10

!ten i
? -- t t t "`•
t
a ,
_-•?` _ .?-` ?? \ ?\ \\ _ i yep
,1 ', `\\y CZ i i
, •,, ` ?__,._ ., it ?\, ?? " ? -?'("?,?', „r (j i
n A
r
x
z?
N
d 8 ?H Z IR
d C1 ? H
z
?M
o?
C1 pf I
Y M EI ?a ?

??r
T

b
b
CD
o.,
>4
0--i
APPENDIX I
PHOTO DOCUMENTATION
Mid-Atlantic

Photograph 2. View of Retention Pond adjacent to Hwy. 17. Note aeration fountains,
vegetative swales (left), area of wetland construction (foreground).
Mid-Atlantic Associates, P.A.
Photodocumentation 1
l I I ??
Photograph 1. View of Canal.

Photograph 4. View of canal from River Bend lot. Looking at undeveloped wetland across
canal.
Mid-Atlantic Associates, P.A.
Photodocumentation 2
i i
along River Bend side of canal
Photograph 3. View of canal. Note bulkhead stabil
(right bank) and unstabilized bank to the left of photo.

Photograph 6. View of corrugated metal pipe
secondary canal.
connects two portions of the
Mid-Atlantic Associates, P.A.
Photodocumentation 3
i
I
I
I
1
I
1
1
I
I
1
I
1

Ux`"
GiMO ? .,? ?'9:w4
14 W'.,f
? J
{
Photograph 7. View of drainage ditch for proposed vegetative filter system (Wetland
Enhancement Program).
Mid-Adantk Associates, P.A.
Photodocumentation 4

I

Photograph 10. View of upland disposal site (Area 3).
I Mid-ANantic Associates, P.A.
Photodocumentation 5
Photograph 9. View of proposed upland disposal site (Area 2).
1
APPENDIX II
AERIAL PHOTOGRAMMETRY
Mi&Adautic Associates, P.A.
i
i
i
i
i

''
1\
I1
i ?

J?A
\ 4
f a +
x i
o
Pit,
A- +'f
nnu Aerial Photogrammetry
EAIFONSI Source: NCDOT
Town of River Bend
-.. _ _.
]+e]ppp+ DRAWN BY- JKJ
?nnrE 1.2o."
Mal

6$
MID-AU ANTIC ASSOCIATES.
Civil o0eot=Wcal *Envimnnmte
Wilmington, NC

i ?
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i

I

APPENDIX III

LETTER: WAYNE MCDEVITT
NCDENR DWR
Mid-Atlantic
1
State of North Carolina
1 Department of Environment,
Health and Natural Resources
1
James B. Hunt, Jr., Governor
Wayne McDevitt, Secretary
1

TOM OF Rkl'lcp? rj? r
September 22, 1997
The Honorable William H. Ritchie, Jr.
Mayor, Town of River Bend
45 Shoreline Drive
River Bend, North Carolina 28562-8970
Dear Mavor Ritchie:
11LE COPY
EDF-=HNFR
I am pleased to announce that $292,000 In financial assistance for the Plantation
Canal klaintenance Dredging project has been approved by the State of North Carolina.
I congratulate the Town of River Bend on its sponsorship of this project. The
removal of sediment and shoals from the Plantation Canal will improve navigation for the
citizens of River Bend and the boating- public. It will also improve fish habitat and storm
water drainage.
The Division of Water Resources of the Department of Environment and Natural
Resources will be contacting your Town Clerk concerning administrative requirements
for the use of state funds for this project.
WiNl:jnm
cc: Mr. John Sutherland, DWR
Sinter 'y.
'W - -...Pqw 40lov4L?*
Wayne McDevitt
1 PO. Box 27687, Raleigh, North Carolina 2761 1-7687 Telephone [phone] FAX [phone]
An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer 50% recycled/10% post-consumer paper
i
i
M,
RCs
>a
E.
1

1

1
1
1

APPENDIX IV
WETLAND SURVEY
1 Mid-Adaotic Associates, P.A.
a
b
'?
C?
R.
C
I

APPENDIX V
LETTER: NC WILDLIFE RESOURCES COMMISSION
I

Mid-Adantic Associate. P.A.

North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
312 N. Salisbury Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27604-1188, 919-733-3391
Charles R. Fullwood, Executive Director
' MEMORANDUM
February 5, 1999
' FROM: Brad E. i lanuners 41,
Division of Inland Fisherics
' TO: Jon Jester
Gulfstream Environmental
' SUBJECT: Scoping request for information to be used in preparing an Environmental
Assessment (EA) for Maintenance Dredging of Riverbend Canal in Craven
' Countv. North Carolina.
The following information is pro% ided as per our discussion on 1/14/99 concerning the
' maintenance dredging project in the canal connecting to the Trent River in the Riverbend
community. Some potential concerns rewarding the project include excessive
sedimentation/turbidity and hottom disturbance during dredging activities. Elevated turbidity
' could reduce water quality in this area and stress aquatic organisms. Excessive turbidity is
particularly damaging to eg and larval lifi: stages of aquatic organisms. Fisheries resources in
this area or adjacent areas provide a verb %aluahle recreational fishery and include striped bass,
' largemouth bass. hluegill, redear sunfish. anti pumpkinseed. Measures to avoid or minimize
impacts to these resources should include restricting dredging activities during warmer summer
months (i.e. April i - September ,0) and localizing turbidity by employing a sediment curtain at
the mouth of the canal during dredging. -Also. a stormwater management plan should be
implemented to control nutrients and other pollutants that negatively impact aquatic resources in
' the canal.
In addition, we are providing the following standardized letter. Although some of the
' information requests and comments ma% not he applicable to certain projects, these guidelines
should facilitate preparation of fisheries and wildlife impact assessments. Our ability to evaluate
project impacts and provide heneficial recommendations when reviewing environmental
t documents will be enhanced if consultants. project sponsors, or permit applicants provide the
following information.
1

1. Complete descriptions ol'\viIdlil'k!. fisheries, and wetland resources within, adjacent to,
or utilizing the proposed project construction area including a listing of species
designated as Iedcrally or state endangered, threatened, or special concern. When
practicable, potential borrow areas to he used for project construction and discharge areas
should be included in the invcntorics. i\ listing ofdesignated animal and plant species
can be developed through consultation with:
N.C. Natural I Ieritage Program
P.O. Box 27087
Raleigh, N.C. 17611
[phone]
and,
N.C.D.A. Plant Conservation Program
P.O. Box 27047
Raleigh, N.C. 27611
(919)7')3-',0 10
' ?. Project map identifying wetland acreage impacted by the project. Wetland acreage
should include all pro.iect related .a-cas that may undergo hydrologic change as a result of
ditching, other drainage. or tilling for project construction. Wetland identification may be
' accomplished through coordination with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE). If the
COE is not consulted. the person delineating wetlands should be identified and criteria
listed.
3. Description of anv streams or \cctlands affected by the project. The need for
channelizing or relocatlnul portion; )I streams and the extent of such activities should be
noted. Any water withdrawals from 11-01.1ndwater or surface water sources should also be
well described. In addition. wetland acreage impacted by alternative project designs
should be provided. Finally, for prOiccts involving the discharge of wastewater, potential
impacts to streams and wetlands >hOUld be thoroughly described, whether wastes are
directly dischgruod tr. surface wa. rs „ !and applied. Adequate buffers should be
maintained bemeen all land application areas and wetlands or streams.
4. Description of project site and non-wetland vegetative communities.
5. The extent of wildlife habitat iragmentation in uplands and wetlands and impacts
associated with fragmentation.
6. Mitigation for avoiding, minimiAna, or compensating for direct and indirect habitat
loss and degradation in quantitative terms.
1
7. A discussion of the cunlul IM e impacts of secondary development facilitated by the
proposed faciIIth inlpro\enlentS. tillch discussion should weigh the economic benefits of
' the project against the costs ofassociated environmental degradation.
8. Ifenvironmcntal docunrents are required, a list ofpreparers and respective areas of
' expertise, including professional qu:llifications, should be included.
Measures to avoid or minimize impacts to sensitive resources, including wetlands, should
' be implemented throughout Iacility p1a1111111e and construction. Where impacts to wetlands are
unavoidable, the N.C. Wildlife Resources c '0mlrlission %?ill recommend mitigation for the losses.
Professional wildlife and fisheries hiolouists should be consulted if aquatic, wetland, or terrestrial
' habitats are affected by this type of development.
Thank you for the opportunity to conullent during the early planning stages of this
project. If you have questions reLl"Irdin-, thc , comments, please call me at [phone].

1

b
a
?•
>a
C

I

I

I
I
7
APPENDIX VI
LETTER: NC NATURAL HERITAGE
Mid-Atlantic Associates. P.A.

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
DIVISION OF PARKS AND RECREATION
AGA
' January 14, 1999
NCDENR

JAMS! B. HUNTJR. Mr. Jon K. Jester
GOVERNOR
GulfStream Environmental, Inc.
P. O. Box 592
Wrightsville Beach, NC 28480
t WAYNE MCDEVITT
SECRETARY SUBJECT: Rare Species, High Quality Natural Communities, and
Significant Natural Heritage Areas at Plantation Canal, Town
' of River Bend, Craven County, N.C.
' DR. PHILIP K. MCKNELLY
DIRECTOR Dear Mr. Jester:
The NC Natural Heritage Program does not have records of high quality natural
communities, rare species, or Significant Natural Heritage Areas at or within a 1.0
' mile radius of the site of the proposed maintenance dredging of the Plantation Canal,
Town of River Bend, Craven County, NC.
E
l
d i
li
f
i
nc
ose
s a
st o
rare species known to ex
st in Craven County. If habitat for any
of these species exists at the site, they may be present there. In order to be sure that
' no rare species exist at the site, a survey might be needed.
Please do not hesitate to contact me at the address below or call me at (919) 715-
8703 if you have any questions or need further information.
Sincerely,
'
r
' Susan Reece Giles
Information Specialist
' Natural Heritage Program
Enclosure

- 'pt ++ P.O. Box 27687
RALEIGH NC 27611-7687 PHONE [phone] FAX [phone]
,
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY /AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER - 50% RECYCLED/109{ POST-CONSUM[R PAP[R
'
SCIENTIFIC NAME
COMMON NAME STATE
STATUS FED.
STATUS STATE
RANK GLOBAL
RANK
' Craven
Vertebrates
Aimophila aestivalis
Bachman's Sparrow
SC
FSC
S3B,S2N
G3
Alligator mississippiensis American Alligator T T(S/A) S3 G5
'
Anhinga anhinga Anhinga SR S2B,SZN G5
Dermochelys coriacea Leatherback Turtle E E SZN G3
Haliaeetus leucocephalus Bald Eagle E T S2B,S2N G4
Laterallus jamaicensis Black Rail SR FSC S3B,S2N G4
Necturus lewisi Neuse River Waterdog SC S3 G3
Notropis bifrenatus Bridle Shiner SC SH G5
Noturus furiosus pop 1 Carolina Madtom - Neuse River SC - S2 G3T2Q
Population
Phalacrocorax auritus Double-crested Cormorant SR SlB,S5N G5
Picoides borealis Red-cockaded Woodpecker E E S2 G3
Sistrurus miliarius Pigmy Rattlesnake SR - S3 G5
Trichechus manatus Manatee E E S1N G2?
'
Ursus americanus Black Bear SR S3 G5
Invertebrates
Lithophane lemmeri
Lemmer's Pinion
SR
-
S
G3G9
Lynceus gracilicornis Graceful Clam Shrimp SR - S22? ? G?
Procambarus plumimanus Croatan Crayfish SR FSC S3? G3
' Vascular plants
Aeschynomene virginica Virginia Jointvetch E T Sl G2

Agalinis aphylla
Scale-leaf Gerardia
SR -
53
G3G4
Agalinis linifolia Flaxleaf Gerardia SR - S3 G4?
Agalinis virgata Branched Gerardia SR - S2 G3G4Q
' Andropogon mohrii Bog Bluestem c - S1
31 G4?
G2Q
Asplenium heteroresiliens Carolina Spleenwort E FSC
Bidens coronata Crowned Beggarticks SR SH G5
Cystopteris tennesseensis Tennessee Bladder-fern E-SC - Sl G5
Dionaea muscipula Venus Flytrap C-Sc FSC S3 G3
G4G5
Eleocharis robbinsii Robbins's Spikerush C S2 5
Eriocaulon aquaticum Seven-angled Pipewort SR S2 G
Isoetes riparia Riverbank Quillwort SR - S1 G4
G3
Litsea aestivalis Pondspice C FSC S2
S2 G3G4
'
Ludwigia alata Winged Seedbox SR
Minuartia godfreyi Godfrey's Sandwort E FSC S1 G1
Myriophyllum laxum Loose Watermilfoil T FSC S1 G3
Peltandra sagittifolia Spoonflower SR - 52S3 G3G4
'
Platanthera integra Yellow Fringeless Orchid T S1 G3G4
Platanthera nivea snowy Orchid T
- S1
S2 G5
G4G5
Ponthieva racemosa Shadow-witch SR - Sl G5
Quercus austrina Bluff Oak SR - S2 G5
Rhynchospora alba Northern White Beaksedge C
Rhynchospora breviseta Short-bristled Beaksedge C 32 G3G4
Rhynchospora oligantha Feather-bristle Beaksedge C - S2S3 G4
Rhynchospora scirpoides Long-beak Baldsedge SR - S2 G4
G4G5
' Sagittaria stagnorum Water Arrowhead SR - S1 G5
Schoenoplectus acutus Hardstem Bulrush SR - SH
S3 G3G4
Schoenoplectus etuberculatus Canby's Bulrush SR G4
Scirpus lineatus Drooping Bulrush C -
- S2
S2 G4
' Scleria georgiana Georgia Nutrush SR
E FSC S3 G3
Solidago pulchra Carolina Goldenrod 33 G3
Solidago verna Spring-flowering Goldenrod E/PT FSC
Utricularia olivacea Dwarf Bladderwort T - S2 G4
G5
Veronica americana American Speedwell SR - S2
S1 G4
Xyris elliottii Elliott's Yellow-eyed-grass SR
Nonvascular plants
' Sphagnum fitzgeraldii
Fitzgerald's Peatmoss
SR
-
S2S3
G2G3
Natural cosaunities
-
-
S1?
GST3
Basic Mesic Forest (Coastal Plain -
Subtype) S3.o G3G9.

Bay Forest - -
55
GS
Brackish Marsh - - - S1 G3?
Coastal Fringe Evergreen Forest - - - S1 G3?
Coastal Fringe Sandhill
' -
me xaTnR]?L HSAITAGSE PRoCtAI[, DIVISION OP PARRS AND RECREATION, DENR July 1998
1
anrovmrsrr tasuL! COMMON NAME
- - 51 G2?
- - S5 G5
- - S4 G4
- - S3 G3
- - S4 G5T5
- - S3 G5
- - S2 G2
- - S1 G1
- - S2 G3
- - 33 G4
- - S4 G4GS
- - Si? G2?
- - S2 G3
- - S3 G4
- - S3 G4
- - S2 G3
- - S3 G3G4
- - S4 G5
Coastal Plain Marl Outcrop
Dry-Mesic Oak--Hickory Forest
High Pocosin
Low Pocosin
' Mesic Mixed Hardwood Forest
(Coastal Plain Subtype)
Mesic Pine Flatwoods
Natural Lake Shoreline
' Nonriverine Wet Hardwood Forest
Pine Savanna
Pine/Scrub Oak Sandhill
Pond Pine Woodland
t Small Depression Pocosin
Small Depression Pond
Tidal Cypress--Gum Swamp
Tidal Freshwater Marsh
' Vernal Pool
Wet Pine Flatwoods
Xeric Sandhill Scrub
special animal habitats
' Gull*Tern*Skimmer Colony
osprey Nesting Area
' Wading Bird Rookery
Craven*
' Vertebrates
Crotalus adamanteus
Heterodon simus
' Vascular plants
Cladium mariscoides
Kalmia cuneata
' Tofieldia glabra
Craven**
' Invertebrates
Agrotis buchholzi
Calephelis virginiensis
Erynnis martialis
Euagrotis lubricans
Euphyes dukesi
Hesperia attalus slossonae
Incisalia irus
' Problema byssus
Pyreferra ceromatica
Satyrium kingi
1
Colonial Waterbirds Nesting
Site
Eastern Diamondback
Rattlesnake
Southern Hognose Snake
SR - 31 G4
SR FSC S3 G4
Twig-rush
White Wicky
Carolina Asphodel
STATE FED. STATE GLOBAL
STATUS STATUS RANK RANK
SR - S2 G5
E-SC ESC S3 G3
C FSC S3 G3
Buchholz's Dart Moth SR FSC S2S3 G2G3
Little Metalmark SR - S3 G4
Mottled Dusky Wing SR - S3 G4
Slippery Dart Moth SR - S3? G4
Dukes' Skipper SR - S2? G3
Dotted Skipper SR - S2S3 G4T3
Frosted Elfin SR - S2S3 G3G4
Byssus Skipper SR - S2 G3G4
Annointed sallow moth SR FSC S1S3 GU
King's Hairstreak SR - S2S3 G3G4
-- - -_-_-- ........?...? ,.4 a nwa Aw" nvrgm1UTI0N. DSNR July 1998
tv%.. PIAI uKAL nr U ALYL rxvtzKAM UMINTY brhL;Mb LlbT LUVLK SHEET
e county species list from the NC Natural Heritage Program is a listing of the elements (rare species, natural communities, and
ecial animal habitats) known to occur in a county. The information on this printout is compiled from a variety of sources,
including field surveys, museums and herbaria, literature, and personal communications. The Heritage Program's Biological and
conservation Database (BCD) is dynamic, with new records being added and old records being revised as new information is
ceived. The BCD was developed and is maintained using methodology developed by The Nature Conservancy. The enclosed list
cannot be considered a definitive record of natural heritage elements, and it should not be considered a substitute for field surveys.
['he-i this information is used in anv document, we request that the printout date be given and that the NC Natural Heritage
ogram be credited.
s cover sheet explains the four columns of status codes that are given on the right-hand side of the county list printout.
STATE STATUS
ODE STATUS
Endangered
T Threatened
I C Special Concern
Candidate
CODE STATUS
P Proposed (E, T, or C)
SR Significantly Rare
EX Extirpated
Wan: statuses are determined by the Plant Conservation Program (NC Department of Agriculture) and the Natural Henmee
roz'am (NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources). E, T, and SC species are protected by state law (Plant
Protection and Conservation Act, 1979). C and SR designations indicate rarity and the need for population monitoring and
I orservation action.
Ammal statuses that indicate state protection (E, T, and SC) are published in Endangered Wildlife of Yorrh Carolina, March 16,
99:, Nongame and Endangered Wildlife Program (NC Department of Environment and Natural Resources). SR and EX statuses
Ire Natural Heritage Program designations. SR indicates rarity and the need for population monitoring and conservation action.
FEDERAL STATUS
is status is designated by the US Fish and Wildlife Service. Federally listed Endangered and Threatened species are protected
under the provisions of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended through the 100th Congress. Unless otherwise noted.
Flniiions are taken from the Federal Re?isrer, Vol. 56, No. 325, November 21, 1991 (50 CFR Part 17).
CODE STATUS DEFINITION
Endangered A taxon "in danger of extinction throughout all of a significant portion of its range."
Threatened A taxon "likely to become an endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all of a
significant portion of its range."
_ Proposed A taxon proposed for official listing as endangered or threatened.
Candidate A taxon under consideration for which there is sufficient information to support listing. This categor;.- was
formerly designated as a Candidate 1 (C1) species.
SC Federal "Species of Concern" (also called "Species at Risk"). Formerlv defined as a [axon under
consideration for which there is insufficient information to support listing; formerly designated as a
Candidate ' (C2) species. Currently, the US Fish and Wildlife Service does not recognize this as an
official designation.
(S, A) Threatened due to Similarity of Appearance. Species with this designation are not considered biologically
endangered or threatened and are listed for trade purposes. [The American Alligator has this designation
' due to similarity of appearance to other rare crocodilians. The Bog Turtle (southern population) has this
designation due to similarity of appearance to Bog Turtles in the threatened northern population.]
Please note that the US Fish and Wildlife Service no longer recognizes the following categories:
IA Candidate 3A A taxon formerly under consideration for listing, but for which there is "persuasive evidence of
extinction."
3B Candidate 3B A taxon formerly under consideration for listing, but which current taxonomic understanding does not
support as a distinct entity meeting the Endangered Species Act's definition of "species."
'C Candidate 3C A taxon formerly under consideration for listing, but which has been "proven to be more abundant or
widespread than previously believed and/or [which is] not subject to any identifiable threat."
GLOBAL AND STATE RANKS
These ranks are determined by The Nature Conservancy's system of measuring rarity and threat status. "Global" refers to
worldwide ranks and "State" to statewide ranks.
STATE RANK DEFINITIONS
Sl Critically imperiled in North Carolina because of extreme rarity or otherwise very vulnerable to extirpation in the state.
S" Imperiled in North Carolina because of rarity or otherwise vulnerable to extirpation in the state.
S3 Rare or uncommon in North Carolina.
S» Apparently secure in North Carolina, with many occurrences.
S5 Demonstrably secure in North Carolina and essentially ineradicable under present conditions.
SA Accidental or casual; one to several records for North Carolina, but the state is outside the normal range of the species.
SH Of historical occurrence in North Carolina, perhaps not having been verified in the past 25 years, and suspected to be still
extant in the state.
SR Reported from North Carolina, but without persuasive documentation for either accepting or rejecting the report
SX Believed to be extirpated from North Carolina.
S: Possibly in peril in North Carolina, but status uncertain; more information is needed.
S^ Unranked, or rank uncertain.
B Rank: of breeding population in the state. Used for migratory species only.
Rank of non-breeding population in the state. Used for migratory species only.
_Z_ Population is not of significant conservation concern; applies to transitory, migratory species.
GLOBAL RANK DEFINITIONS
G1 Critically imperiled globally because of extreme rarity or otherwise very vulnerable to extinction throughout its range.
GZ Imperiled globally because of rarity or otherwise vulnerable to extinction throughout its range.
G3 Either very rare and local throughout its range, or found locally in a restricted area.
G» Apparently secure globally, although it may be quite rare in parts of its range (especially at the periphery).
G5 Demonstrably secure globally, although it may be quite rare in parts of its range (especially at the periphery).
GH Of historical occurrence throughout its range.
GX Believed to be extinct throughout its range.
Gt; Possibly in peril, but status uncertain; more information is needed.
G` Unranked, or rank uncertain.
G _Q Of questionable taxonomic status.
T_ Status of subspecies or variety; the G rank refers to the species as a whole.
ADDITIONAL DEFINITIONS
Elements following county names marked with one or two asterisks indicate obscure or historic records.
Obscure record: the date the element was last observed in the county is uncertain.
'• Historic record: the element was last observed in the county more than 50 years ago.
Scientific and common names listed in parentheses are synonyms listed in US Fish and Wildlife Service, 1992, Endangered and I
Threatened Species of the Southeastern United States (The Red Book).
L

1

1
a
APPENDIX VII
LETTER: US FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE
Mid-Atiantic Associates, P.A.

TO:
United States Department of the Interior
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE.
Raleigh Field Office
Post Office Box 33726
Raleigh, North Carolina 276361726
' Mr. Jon K. Jester
Vice President
Gulf Stream Environmental, Inc.
P.O. Box 592
Wrightsville Beach, NC 28480
' Thank you for your letter requesting information or recommendations from the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service. This letter provides the Service's response pursuant to Section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531-1543), and the Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 661-667d).
Re: Environmental Assessment for proposed maintenance dredging of Plantation Canal, in the
Town of River Bend, in Craven County, North Carolina
Project Name/Location/County
January 14, 1999 99-0280
Date of Incoming Letter Log Number
' The attached pages list the federally-listed species which occur within Craven County.
The attached maps indicate the locations where Federally-listed endangered or threatened
species have been sighted in the area. The project as described appears unlikely to affect
upland or terrestrial species, therefore only aquatic/marine species are included.
' For further information about state-listed or rare species, and State designated, rare or valuable
biological habitats, you may wish to contact the North Caroiina Natural Heritage Program at
[phone].

c logical Ser es Supervisor Date

COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME STATUS
CRAVEN COUNTY
Vertebrates
Bachman's sparrow Aimophila aestivalis FSC
American alligator Alligator mississippiensis T(S/A)
Leatherback sea turtle Dermochelvs coriacea Endangered
Bald eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Threatened
Southern hognose snake Heterodon simus FSC
Black rail Laterallus jatnaicensis FSC
Red-cockaded woodpecker Picoides borealis Endangered
Manatee Trichechus tnanatus Endangered
Invertebrates
Croatan crayfish Procambarus plumimanus FSC
Annointed sallow moth Pvreferra cerornatica FSC*
Vascular Plants
Sensitive jointvetch Aeschvnaanene virginica Threatened
Carolina spleenwort Asplenium heteroresiliens FSC
Chapman's sedge Carex chapmanii FSC*
Venus flytrap Dionea inuscipula FSC
White wicky Kalmia cuneata FSC*
Pondspice Litsea aestivalis FSC
Godfrey's sandwort Minuartia godfreyi FSC
Loose watermilfoil Myriophyllum laxum FSC
Savanna cowbane Oxvpolis ternata FSC
Spring-flowering goldenrod Solidago verna FSC
Carolina asphodel Tojieldia glabra FSC*
January 15, 1999 Page 14 of 49

1

s
J
C
0
m
L
N
C
N
r C)
L Q?
L Q.
O V)
a
x (1)
W L
v ?
Q ?
W ui
a ? a ' i?
o) a - a
m L
_0 I a U
a u E c c
.11 1

CF)
C
co
m
L
F-

d
?.J

d
d
'.d

J

1

1
1

1

C
co
L
N?
LPL.
N
C
N
o ?
/fly.
L /1
L
O
a ?
x
Q ?
W
W
m a vi a
T
a 5 E c c
.11 1

L
H

?J
-d
°s
m
I

t

I
I

oor
'IN

I

I

I
I

APPENDIX VIII
EASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL
SEDIMENT SAMPLING REPORT
Mid-Adaotic Associates. P.A.
i
RAYBON ENGINEERING PA
Civil-Environmental-Marine
P.O. Box 15009 New Bern, NC 28561
March 18, 1999
Mr. Rudy Smithwick
Gulf Stream Environmental, Inc.
P.O. Box 592
Wrightsville Beach, NC 28480
[phone] Pager 636-8566 Digital
Fax [phone]
RE: River Bend Sampling Report
Dear Mr. Smithwick:
Enclosed is a copy of the report of sampling for the River Bend dredging project. This is for
inclusion in your report.
Thank you for your assistance.
Respectfully,
William C. Raybon, P.E.

1-10

1 March 16, 1999
Dear Mr. Raybon:
' Mr. William C. Raybon
Raybon Engineering
t PO Box 15009
NC 28561
New Bern,
u

1

1
t

1

EASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL
PO BOX 561 BRIDGETON, NC 28519
[phone] FAX [phone]

RE: River Bend, Channel Run Canal Sediment Analysis.
Eastern Environmental recently collected sediment samples from along River Bend's
Channel Run Canal. The samples were collected at approximately 750 feet intervals.
Sediment cores ranging between 12 and 18 inches were recovered, placed in sterile
jars on ice for delivery to the analyzing laboratory. The samples were analyzed by
Method 9071A for Oil & Grease and TCLP Extraction, Method SW846 1311, RCRA
Metals. The analysis results indicate metal concentrations are significantly below
regulatory action levels. The Oil & Grease concentrations are above regulatory limits
in 6 of the sediment samples. These results are not surprising for highly organic
bottom or swampy sediments. Naturally occurring oils from both macro and micro plant
and animal remains can account for the elevated concentrations found in the samples.
A correlation in the analysis and the sediment descriptions is apparent. The mucky,
highly organic sediment samples with obvious plant debris show the highest Oil &
Grease concentrations. Sandier, less organic samples have lower Oil & Grease
concentrations.
Please see the following attachments:
Figure 1 Site location & Topographic Map
Figure 2 Bottom Sample Collection Locations (except Island Creek)
Figure 3 Sediment Core Descriptions
Table 1 Summary of Sediment Sample Laboratory Analysis
Laboratory Reports and Chain of Custody.
If you have questions please call [phone].
Thank you for allowing Eastern Environmental to be of service.
Sincerel
F.X. LaValle
Project Manager

Ch`
Hdy?oof
,aA'?• orb`
Rodky Hun
Sch
V 3
?LOCAnoN .
TpEN. ti RIVER BEND
CHANNEL.RUN.CANAL `'.Ce•`on
' M ?'
Tar .. LOCAPON ?r
,.RNER BEND
-ISLAND CREED- cif
P ham
• ?. ^? ? \, dl8?. f1Q. /'rte •
?/ ''? wmc ora - 'S
Land,RL
f
R A . T A.
LL C
EASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL
DATE: 3/99 SCALE' 1:24,000 DRAWN BY: USGS
f- ` TITLE: SITE L TION & TOPOGRAPHIC MAP
. FIGURE: 1 PROJECT: RIVER BEND CHANNEL RUN CANAL
RIVER BEND
CHANNEL RUN CANAL
O

KEY
?6 SAMPLE COLLECTION
POINT
L
SAMPLE # L1 WAS
COLLECTED IN ISLAND /
CREEK (NOT SHOWN)
9
L1
y
BASE DRAINUNG PROVIDED BY
RAYBON ENGINEERING
EASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL
L1
DATE: 3/99 SCALE: 1" = 500' DRAWN BY: JDR
TITLE: BOTTOM SAMPLE COLLECTION LOCATIONS
RIVER FIGURE: 2 PROJECT: RIVER BEND CHANNEL RUN CANAL
PROJECT.'
RIVER BEND CHANNEL RUN CANAL
SEDIMENT CORE DESCRIPTIONS
NO. DESCRIPTION
1 16", VERY DARK BROWN, OOZY, HIGH ORGANIC, MUCKY, OILY
SHEEN, PLANT DEBRIS.
2 18", DARK BROWN, OOZY TO SLIGHTLY FIRM, HIGH ORGANIC,
SOME SAND.
3 14", VERY DARK BROWN, OOZY TO SLIGHTLY FIRM, HIGH
ORGANIC, OILY SHEEN, PLANT DEBRIS.
4 16", VERY DARK BROWN, OOZY TO SLIGHTLY FIRM, HIGH
ORGANIC.
5 12", DARK BROWN, SOME OOZY TO FIRM, HIGH ORGANIC, SOME
SAND.
6 14", DARK BROWN TO BROWN, SLIGHTLY FIRM TO FIRM, ORGANIC,
SANDY.
7 18", VERY DARK BROWN, OOZY TO SLIGHTLY FIRM, HIGH
ORGANIC.
8 16", DARK BROWN, OOZY TO SLIGHTLY FIRM, HIGH ORGANIC.
9 18", VERY DARK BROWN, OOZY TO SLIGHTLY FIRM, HIGH
ORGANIC, OILY SHEEN, PLANT DEBRIS.
10 16", VERY DARK BROWN, OOZY TO MUCKY, HIGH ORGANIC,
ABUNDANT PLANT DEBRIS.
11 18", VERY DARK BROWN, OOZY TO MUCKY, HIGH ORGANIC, PLANT
DEBRIS.

Eastern Environmental
1-1
_... c A, .

W
Z
O
1 ?
W
Z
' W
ti

t

1

W

J

Z

0

Q

0
m

W
J

Z
L.U

W J
Q

<
=

IJLI
Z
Q

Z

0

U
Z
=
z

- -
u
0 U

ZZ

-
=

°'
(3)
°'
J

Q
E- ?

(n m
w
>
= m

W
Z U

Q
2

4
,
to In LO LO LO LO Ln LO LO LO In
?;. O O O O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O O O O
\y, V V V V V V V V V V V

u
\ In
°
° LO In Ln T-
° 1-
\
O O
° O
° O O O O
° O
V V O V V V V O
(DO
N N LO N N LO N N N C0 N
0 O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
O O
O
O O
' O O O
, O O O O
' O O
lit. V V O V V O v v V O V

O
O
Lo
O
Lo
O
Lo
O
Lo to
O In
O Ln
O to
O 0
O to
O
O O O O O O O O O O O
?s4 O V V V V V V V V V V
\
l N LO w d M N N M N N N
O
p, 0
' O
0 O
0 O
0 O
0 O
0
' O
0
' O
0 O
0
' O
0
' O
0

v 0 0 0 0 v v o v v v

N N N N N N N N N N N
O
O
I O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O O
O
m
oll ? V V V V V V V V V V V
O .?,M
O ? C r-
N IT
LO O
M N
M O
M O
M O
N co
M co
N N co
M

O O O O O O O
to O
' O ' o O
V V O V O O O O O O

0
?
Y
°
0
rn
M LO 00
0
0 N C
7 N 0
0 00

0 z
J r- N M 'T Ln 14 ti OP M r
U a J J J J J J J J -? J J
O
:\v\
J <

r
LAW P; CO . . . TEL:[phone] Mar 15'99
From: Law & Company of Wilmington, Inc.
17.1 Castle Street / PO Box 629
Wilmington, NC 28402 NC 37704 I 'WW 16
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone] SC 99049
March 15, 1999
lb:UI NU.vvo r.iz,
To : EAPTERIL MURONMENTAL
17. }{ L97JUM
p.p. Bax 561
BRXDGETON, NC 28519
EMME
The following analytical results have be On obtain fnt tha
indicated sample which was submitted to this laba=tazT;
I

t

1
t

I
SaWle I`.D. SR-12910
Purchase,order number: RB399
Location Description: RIVER BEND
Sample collection date: 02/27/99
Lab submittal date: 03/03/99
Received by: DL
Location code:
Project account` cadaa_ &.-
Sample collector: F.X. LAVALLE
Time: 13:45
Time: 12:10
Validated by: 0C
Parameter: OIL & GREASE, SOXLET EXTRACT
Method reference: 9071A Mme, or sensitivity: 50
Result: 489 m9/kJ Date finished: T3714/39
Date started: 03/11/99 Analyst: 9
Time started: 0800
Parameter: TCLR EXTRACTION NON VOLATILES
Method reference: SW846 1311 Unit: N/A
Mn$ or
Result: pomplau
Date started.. 03/08/99 Dade fin f x/99
Analyst: Tel
Time started: 15:00
Parameter: ARSWIC (As), TCLP
Method reference: EPA 200.8
Result: k.009- -
Date stared : 63 /°13 / 9 9
Time started: 13:00
Parameter: BARIUM (Ba), TCLP
Method reference: EPA 200.8
Result: 0.27 mg/L
Date started: 03110/99
Time started: - 14:80
Parameter: CADMIUM ((CAd)200. , TeLP
Hothc)& rot evemmWe
Result: c.002
n2 ata:rted: a3/10/99
Time started: 14:50

I - s
Unit: mg/L
MDt or • 00'x'
Date fifft
Analyst. JD
MDL or senfitd?!-L? .005
Date fini WTW49
Analyst: Jam"
Unfit :
MDL or sw=A g .002
Date f ini - CC== an
-
Analyst: JAD

L

t

t
t

n
LAW & CO... TEL:[phone] Mar 15'99 1b:U2 NO.UUM F'.2U
EASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL Sample I.D. BR32910 (continued)
Page : 2 ---
- - -
Ma ah 151, 199a
Parameter: CHYLQMIUM (Cr), TCLP
Method r?eferenee: EPA 200.8
Result : ? . 002-
Date otazted: 03/10/99
Time staktad. 1A:50
Parameter: LEAD (Pb), TCLP
Method rpferen?? EPA 200.8
Result : 0.001A mg/-L
Date stat'ted: 03/10/99
Time started: L4 t50
Parameter: MERCLW, TCLP
Method reference: EPA 245.1
Result: k.0002-
Date started: Q3/--12/99
Time started: 10:00
Parameter: SELENIUM (Se), TCLP
Method refere=e: EPA 200.8
Result: x.005
Data atazted: 03/13/99
Time started- 1300
Parameter: SIL!&ER- (Ag) , TCLP
Method ref erne :-- EPA 200.8
Result: 0.005
Date started: 03/10/99
Time stai-ted: t4--430
Sample comments:
su D= s: Knorr x.-1
"=w ax mom u??L? f
If there are any questions regarding this data, gleams call.

n
Iichardpive
President
Unit: mg/L
MDR or Qentit1wj&v. .002
Date finite} 0 - W99
Analyst: 3IJ)-• _
MDL or semi. - . H9
Date fiaistmd:- 43-/W99
Analyst.L JAD-
Unit: mg/L
MM or seWd y ? . Q2
Date fi -
Analyst : C1T
Unit: mg/L
MDR, or wemtiyi r ?1Q5
DaXe f iaisked- - 03¢x/ 9.9-
AMlyet: J= - -
Urd t : rng/-L -- -
MD1 or sen itiv t'T. 005
Date fidisfuad: 031=0/99
Analyst: JXU-- -

4

LAW & CO... TEL:[phone] Mar 15'99 16:00 No.008 P.17
From: Law & Company of Wilmington, Inc. _
17*11 Castelc Street / PO Box 629 Wi`lmtnq=, NC 28402
TEL: [phone] NC 37704 / WW 16
FAX: [phone] SC 99049
March 15, 1999
To : &WERN ZNURONMENTAL
Ef . x . LAMLE
P.O. BOX Stl
BRXDGETON, NC 28519
EE?V?TSFs
The following analytical results
indicated- sampte which was submit
i
8amp1• I:D. DR32911
Purchase order number: RB399
Location Description: RIVER BEND
Sample collectton date: 03/02/99
Lab submittal date: 03/03/99
Received; by : DL
have been obtained for the
*ted to this 1
Location code: HENI a
Project account Cede: A
Sample collector: F.X. LAVALLE
Time: 13:10
Time: 12:10
Validated by: DC
Parameter: OIL & GREASE, SOXLET EXTRACT
Method reference: 9071A
iv tr y 5.0
ReaLtlt : ? 9 .kg M14 or sen!ir -
Date started: Q3711/99 Date fiaiskad.,:-03/]2/99
Time started: 08x00 Analyst: TiBDt
Parameter: TCLP EXTRACTION NON VOLATILES
Method reference :- SW846 1311 Ur4t : N/A
Result: complou MDL or saKsi 1f/A
Date started: Q3/08/99 Date finidmCL./99
Time started: 15:00 Analyst: TAX
Parameter: ARSENIC (As), TCLP
Method r¢ferecs: EPA 200.8
Result: <.005
Date started: Q3/13/99
Time started: 13:.00
Parameter: BARIUM (Ba), TCLP
Method r6fer mm. EPA 200.8
Result : 6.S4 rtq/L
Date ataTted: O3/10/99
Time started: 14:50
Unit: mg/L_ _ ,
MDL or serrtitivtty: .002
Date fini&h&&--03/13/99
Analyst: JAD
MDL or sensitiVIX7: .QOS
Date f inimbmds- 91
Analyst: JAS
Parameter: CADMIUM (Cd), TCLP
Met=od;- mere= L EPA 200.8
Result : <,002
Date started: 03/10/99
Time started: 14:50
Ur4t : mg/L_
MDL or sen*Lt:- at .0_-02
Date fins _
Analyst: JAD
J
R _ -
LAW C CO... TEL:[phone] Mar 15'99 1b:U1 NO.uuu r.io
EASTERN ENV I ROUMENTAL Sample I . D . BR3 2911 (coafi inuada-
Page : 2 ,
March 15;, 199-9-
Parameter: CHROMIUM (Cr), TCLP
0
8
.
Method referenes3: EPA 20
/L
m MDL or sensitivitys 002
g
Date Result: eta=ted rted:
03/10/99 Date finitdsad:..0-TLI0/99

Time atapted=1A.I.SD An?lya -
Param tee :. LEAf1 (fib) , TCLP
Method refersaee t EPA 200.8
Unit.
ormg///L rfiGL ': .005
Result :
- 03/10/99
d
rt Date finis3md: ax/1.Q/99
: :
e
sta
Date
Time startedr-14s50 Anelyet s JW
Parameter: MERCURY, TCLP
Method reference: EPA 245.1 Unit: m9/L
Q2
started: tarrteedd: : 03/12/99
t
D
D U or ss?
Date fintah*&- 03 lZ/49
e
a
Time started: 10:00 Analyst: Ca.
TCLP
)
,
Parameters SaLWIUM (Se
8
EPA 200 Unit: mQ/L
.
Method rofereneez MDL or ssm&i tidy : .005
Result: K.05
- 03/13/99
tarted Date fin TV-"

.
Date s
Time started: 13:00 -
Analysti 17A-=
Parameter: SILVER (Ag), TCLP
8
EPA 200
m
:
Unit
eL
.
Method reference: ?
,005
o
or
Reault : 1;C.005

tartad: X3/`3.0/99
Date f isttib 7.`=V 9S
r?
Date
Time started: 1.4:50 Analyst: JAD
I Sample comments::
RYCiIM By DjBM LAVA M
yLV= .L-2 - j
If there: are any questions regarding this data, please call.
t w s??
ichard Spivey
President

LAW & CO... TEL:910-762
From: Law & Company of Wilt
1711 Castle Street /
Wilmington, NC 28402
TEL: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
t

1

1

1
-7082 Mar 15'99 15:58 No.008 r.1?)
nington, Inc.
PO Box 629
NC 37704 /-WW 16
SC 99049
March 15, 1999
To; &"TEAN MVIRONMENTAL
F . K . LAVILLE
P.O. sox Sel
-BR OGRTM MC 28519
The follbving analytical results have been obtained tea tine
indicated sample which was submitted to this laboratory:
$&Mle I09. B432912
Purchase order number: RB399
Location-Description: RIVER BEND
Sample collection date: 03/02/99
Lab submittal date: 03/03/99
Received by: DL
Location code: EEM2-
Project account code :-A
Sample collector: F.X. LAVALLE
Time: 13:35
Time: 22:10
Validated by: DC
Parameter: OIL & GREASE, SOXLET EXTRACT
Method reference: 9071A
Result : 130 mg/-cg MDL or aomitie : 50
Date started: 03/11/99 Date finiA?had: 03-/L-2/99
Time started: 08:00 Analysts TA
Parameter: TCLP EXTRACTION NON VOLATILE9
Method reference: SW846 1311 Unit: N/A
Result: gomplete MDI1 or aeuattivity: H/A
Date started: 03/08/99 Date finiahd: Q3fQ9/99
Time started: L600 Analyst i- TJX--- -
Parameter; ARMWIC (As), TCLP
Method referteUM: EPA 200.8
Result : 0.005 1119/L
Date started: 03/13/99
Time started: 13:00
Parameter: BARIUM (Ba), TCLP
Method reference: EPA 200.8
Result: 0.39 mg/L
Data ota3tted: Q3/10/99
Time started: 14:50
Parameter: CADMIUM (Cd), TCLP
Method reference? EPA 200.8
Result: 4.002
Date started. 03/10/99
Time started: 14:50
MDL or sensitivity: Q02
Dace firzishad: o:Vi3/99
Analyst: JAD
MDL or sensitivity: .005
Date f ' i-9a
Analyst: JAD
Unit : mg-/L = --
.
MDr. or eanait 1= .0W
Date f inishwL 1 D I29
Ana6lyst :6 ?- - -- - - -
r

LAW & CO... TEL:[phone] Mar 15'99 15:59 No.008 P.16
2 d)

t
t
t

1

EASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL Sample I.D. BR3 912 (continue
Page : 2
Ma;ch 15,, 190-?
Parameter: CHROM.111M (Cr) , TCLP
Method reference: EPA 200.8
Result: 0.006 tsg/L MOt or sensitivity: .002
Date started: 03/10/99 Date finished: 03-/10/99
Time started: 14 i30 Anlilyst- T=
Parameter: LEAD (Pb), TCLP
Method re-ferencet EPA 200.8
Result: x.005
Date stated: 03/10/99
Time started: 14:50
Parameter: KM=W, TCLP
Method refereesez EPA 245.1
Result: 0 0 05' tsg,CL
Date started: 03/12/99
Time atarted: :LO:-00
Parameter: SPJAVMM (Se), TCLP
Method reference EPA 200.8
Result : 0.01 mg/L
Date started: 03/13/99
Time started: 133-00
Parameter: SILVER (Ag), TCLP
Method reference: EPA 200.8
Result: x.005
Date started: 03/10/99
Time started: 14:50
Sample comments:
at?onas ass ?.-:
Unit: mg/L
MM or senti•tiuiaLy t • Q05
Date finished:"03-1 10/99
Analyst : JAD
M13L or ten?.ttiu W . .02
Date finished: 03-11'2/99
Analyst: CU--- -
mt or senoltfr ty: .005
Date finite 03713/99
Analysts JAD " -
Unit: mg/L
MDL or sensitivity: .005
Date finisftct: 03/10/99
Analyst: JU

If there are any questions regarding this data, pleisa carp. u3-
Richar?Spivey
President

LAW-9 CO... TEL:[phone] Mar 15'99
From: Law & Company of Wilmington, Inc.
1711 Castle Street / PO Box 629
Wil. mingtozi, NC 28402
TEL: [phone] NC 37704 /:-WW 16
FAX: [phone] SC 99049
March 15, 1999

1

t

1
To : EA?LT= $NMMNMENTAL
F. LAVALLE
P.O. BOX 561
BRID0911M, NC 28519
EE?EIBB
15:57 No. 008 P.13
The following analytical results have been obtain-A fcr the
indicated sample which was submitted to this laboratory:
sanple I.D. BRI2913 Location code: MDPJBS
Purchase order number: RB399 Project account erY"t A
Location Description: RIVER BEND Sample collector: F.K. LAVALLE
Sample collection date: 03/02/99 Time: 13:50
Lab submittal date: 03/03/99 Time: 12:10
Received-by: DL Validated by : DC
Parameter: OIL & GREASE, SOXLET EXTRACT
Method reference: 9071A
Result: 134 mg/'kg MDL or sensitivity-. 50
Date started: 03/11/99 Date finialubd: 03-/12/99
Time started: 06:00 Analyst: T!&
Parameter: TCLP EXTRACTION NON VOLATILES
Method r4farenne: SW846 1311 Unit: N/A
Result: domplete MDL or sensitivity: N/A
Date started: 03/08/99 Date fizriahad.: 014'a9/"
Time stagt-ed: 15:00 Analyst: T W
Unit: mg/L
MDL or sensitivity: .002
Date fins. zhad; W13119
Analyst.- JAD
Parameter: ARSEI+TIC (As) , TCLP
Method references EPA 200.8
Result: 4.005
Date started: 03/13/99
Time started: 13:00
Parameter : BA9II3M (Ba) , TCLP
Method reference: BPA 200.8
Result: 0.32 mg/L
Date started: 03/10/99
Time started: Lt:SO
Parameter: CADMIUM (Cd), TCLP
Method reference: EPA 200.8
Result: 4.002
Date started: 03/10/99
¦ Time started: 1A:30
r
MDL or sensitivity: .005
Date finished: 03/10/99
Analyst : JAC
Unit : mg/L
MDL or sensitivity-e 002
Date fin4.ahed-r- Gayle/99
Anallyst r JAS'" -
r
- _..qd0MM11r

LAW G CO... TEL:[phone] Mar 15'99 15:58 No.uuj r'.14
EASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL Sample I.D. BR3Z913 (continu&d4
Page : 2 , - - .? -
March 15;, 194

Parameter: CHROMIUM (Cr), TCLP
Method reference: EPA 200.8
Result: 0'.00C-mKjj'L
Date started: 03/10/99
Timms started-:- 1AA0
MDR, or sen&Wx: ty: .002
Date finite; 03/:_0/99
Arftlyst-: J? - -
i

1

1

1
Parameters: LEAD ft), TCLP
Method reference: EPA 200.8
Result: 4.005
Date started: 03/10/99
Time started: 14:50
Parameter: Nom, TCLP
Method reference: EPA 245.1
Result: <.0002
Date started: 03/12/99
Time started : 1.0 -00
Parameter: alLMMM (Se), TCLP
Method raferenrs u EPA 200.8
Result: 0.009 Mg/L
Date stated: (13/13/99
Time started: 1300
Parameter: SILVER (Ag), TCLP
Method referenee;. EPA 200.8
Result: f..005
Date started: 0a/10/99
Time st4tted: 14:50
Unit: mq/L_
MDL or senaitivity: 005
Date finiss- 03,/10/99
Analyst. JW
Unit: mg/L
MDL or sensit}vitX: .Q2
Date finishad: 03/12/99
Analyst i -C2,--
MDL or sensitivity: .005
Date f i 9
Analyst : JE$--
Unit: mg/L
MDtr or a°--1 t'4Xi 1'' .005
Date fini9#ed:-45-/x-/99
Analyst : JU
sample cmmmenta':
8LUDO 9WLt L-a
RSCt= NY DXM LAVA= -
If there-are any questions regarding this data, plea** call.
icy ?V v
Richard Spivey
President

LAW 3 CO... TEL:[phone] Mar 15'99 15:56 No.uuu v.ii
1 _
From: Law- & Company of Wilmington, Inc.
' 1711 Castli Street / PO Box 629 `
K 1lmiagtLm,? NC 28402 -
TE: 910-762-7082 NC 37704 f WW 16
' FAX: [phone] SC 99049
March 15, 1994
' To EA=Mff M1171RONMENTAL
F. X . LA VALLS
P.O. BOK 561
_B1ZIDC33MQ51, NC 28519
EENu?E
1 -
The following analytical results have been obtained for the

' indicated sample, which was submi tted to this labatakery:
Sample I.D. MU2914 Location code: EBNNU
Purchase order number: RB399 Project account cad&+ A
' Location Description: RIVER BEND Sample collector: F.R. LAVALLE
Sample collection date: 03/02/99 Time: 14:05
Lab submittal date: 03/03/99 Time: 12:10
Received,by: DL Validated by: DC

' Parameter: OIL & ©REASE, SOXLET
Method reieronae r 9071A EXTRACT
Result: 124 mgA7 MDb or senaitiQtt; gs
?
?-
Date stated: C3/11/99 0
Date finixH
t Time ata;ted: C[8:00 Analyst., TAM -
Parametet: TCLP EXTRACTION NON VOLATILES
Method roferenaa: SN846 1311 Unit: N/A
MDL or aensitivfXy: Y/A
' Result: complete -
Datz started- G.3/08/99 Dabe finiakseL- 4"/99
Tim& st& rted : 15:00 Analyst T: TAT
TCLP
A
)
s
,
Paramete ARSIMIC (
Method r Terence: EPA 200.8
Result: .01 mq,/L
MDL or r®neitivit: .002
'
Date started: 03/13/99
Date finishsd: 013/99
Time started: x3:00 Analyst; J 3w
' Parameter: MR111M (Ba), TCLP
Method "ferenco EPA 200.8
m
0--
0.39
Result:
I„
DL or aensitivcity: .005
3/10/99
O?d
d:
starte
Date Date finished-: 03/10/99
'
Time started: 14:50 a,l.yst: JAM
An

' Parameter: CADUM (Cd), TCLP
Method rafsreaaa: - SPA 200.8
Unit- : mg,/L -
Result: 4.002
03/10/99
d MDL or seneitiaity. 002
Dane fin1nbmd.-14V"t%q-
' :
Mato starte
Time started: 2A : 50 Analyst : JAMB = - ?-

i
TEL:[phone] Mar 15'99 15:5b No.uut3 r.i4
' LAW & CO...
EASTERN ENVIRONMR4TAL Sample I.D. BR32?14 (continued)
' Page: 2
March 15, 1939
' Parameter: CHROMIUM (Cr) , TCLP
- _
EPA 200.8
Method rg-feTmcer
: b .003 mQ/L
Result
MDJ+ or •ansitivi `??.002

Dates started: t3/-10/99 fitiil?d??71a/g9
Date
-
t Time staltted: 14.-SO Analyst 3 J&

' Parametez: LEAD (Pb), TCLP
- Method r6feramve : EPA 200.8
Unit: mg/L
Result: c.005
3/10/99
rted: 0
t MDR or eensitLvi :-.005
Date finieh?: 010/99
' .
a
Date s
Time started: 3r4:50 Analysts JSD
Paramet:K : 14EAHJM, TCLP
Method roferencr : EPA 245.1
??t:
mg/

'
Result: s. ^,^n? ia
saattd.'a• o-?

Date started: 03/12/99 ?
Dare f
Time started.. 3.D:.00 Analyst : CO
' CLP
? .
IUM (Se), T
Parameter: SEL
Method rgferenge:--3PA 200.8
Desalt : 0.01 m ?& or sensitivity: .005
Date started: Oa/13/99
Date f i4iglS?? 73 /99

Time started: 13:00 Anatl st: JAM
y
' Parameter,: SILVER (Ag), TCLP
Method refereaaa: EPA 200.8
Unit: mq/L

Result: <.005
MDT or aeni * ODS
14-
Date started: 03/10/99 Date finished: 03)'10/99
' Time started: 14:20 An4lyst: JAII
t Sample ccmments:
BrAmm SAM" 0-6
' 1zCzrw R M*A LFVMZ&
If there are any questions regarding thist data, prrea ffa call.
Li

1j'sf, t
Richar Spivey
President In IP

TEL:[phone] Mar 15'99 15:54 NO.UUb r.uy
' LAW 3 CO...
t From: LaW & Company of Wilmington, Inc.
1711 Cant46- Street / PO Box 629
wllmingCOn NC 28402

I
I

TEL: [phone] NC 37704 / WW 16
FAX: [phone] SC 99049
March 15, 1999
To: EASTERN E rRONMENTAL
F.Z. LAVALLE
P.b. RD" 61
BRIDE ET= DEC 28519
EEI?SLf
The following analytical results have been obtained for the
indicated sample which was submitted to this laboratory:
Sample I.D. B1372915 Location code: EMME
Purchase order number: RB399 Project account core: A
Location Description: RIVER BEND Sample collector: F.X. LAVALLE
Sample collection date: 03/02/99 Time: 14:20
Lab submittal date: 03/03/99 Time: 1-2:10
Received:by: DL Validated by: De
Parameter: OIL & GREASE, SOXLET EXTRACT
Method reference: 9071A
Result: 5.0 mg/kg MDL or senaittvtty: 50
Date started: 03/11/99 Date finiobadr 03-A11199
Time started: 06:00 Analyst : TX14
Parameter: TCLP EXTRACTION NON VOLATILES
Method referenca: SW846 1311 Unit: Nsensitivity: N/A complete MDL or Result:
Date started: : 03 03 /08/99 Date finished.- 03-/04/99 Time started: 19:00 Analyst: TAH
Parameter: ARSWIC (As), TCLP
Method reference.: 8pA 200.8
Result: 0'.009 n/L
Date started: 03/13/99
Time started: 13:Q0
Parameter. BARIUM (Ba), TCLP
Method referaneei SPA 200.8
Result: 0; 39 mgtL
Date started: 03/3.0/99
Time started: 14:90
MDL. or oenaitivity: .002
Date finished: 03J13/99
Analyst: JAD
MDL'or oensit:vitr: .005
Date finished.: 03/10/99
Analyst: JAC
Parameter: CADMIMN (Cd), TCLP
Method reference: EPA 200.8
Result: <,002
Date started: Q3/10/99
Time: started: 14WSQ

Unit: mg/L
MDL..or sensair.,i Xi &-- -44'
Date finiahad; BQ.B_y`99-
Ana3yst . -dW

' LAW 3 CO... TEL:[phone] Mar 15'99 15 55 NO.uuu r.iu
EASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL Sample I.D. BR32915 (continued)
Page; 2 ? '- J
March 15; 1959
' Parameter: CHRnMITM (Cr), TCLP
Method r!i f erence : EPA 200.8
Result: x.002
Date, started: 04/10/99
Time started: 3A SSA
Parameter: LSAD (Pb), TCLP
' Method rlteraaa&?- SPA 200.8
Result: t.005

t Date started: Q3/10/99
Tim sta;ted: IA450
Parameters MEACUU, TCLP
Me.bodr ":fereaerf SPA 245.1
Restat : 1004!?-eff/S
Date started: ®/12/99
Time started: 10:00
Parameter: SELENIUM (Se), TCLP
Method reference: SPA 200.8
' Result: 1.005
Date started: 03/13/99
Time sta=tted: 13:00
' Parameter: SILVER (Ag), TCLP
Method rgtarsum : SPA 200.8
' Result: <.005
Date started: 03/10/99
Time started: 14:90
MIellts
S
l
e C X
amp
euJoa WOU u-*
"Cww w DAL LRVMNM
' If there are any questions regarding this data, please call.

Unfit: mg/L
MDL or sensitivity: 002
Date finisRSd- Q3 n/99
Analyst., AD
Untt: mg/L
MDL or sensitivity 005
Dade f ini*uda-43A"9
Analyst f JIM
MDf; or aewdt4 %1=:. .112
Date finished: 03/12199
CST'
Analysts-
Unit: mg/L
MD!{ or amnsitA*LtV-,- .005
Date f inisftt: 03760/"
AnaElyst : JIW
unit-: mg/L -
MDL or senaitivit;.y s .005
Dane finishadf 03/10/99
Analyst: JXD
har?S ive
Ric p
President

1

1

LAW 3 CO... TEL:[phone] Mar 15'99 15:53 No.=3 r.ur
From: Lair & CompatLy of Wilmington, Inc.
1711 Castle Street / PO Box 629
Wilmingt h, NC 28402
TEL: [phone] NC 37704 / WW 16
FAX: 9LO-762-8785 SC 99049

1

March 15, 1999
To: EASTERK ENVIRONMENTAL
F. K. LARUM
P.6. BQX 5 Cpl
BRIDGETON-, NC 28519
EE$UME
The foll6wing analytical results have been obtained for the
indicated sample which was submitted to this lab rataxy:
8a vie 1. 0. SPA-2916
Purchase order number: RB399
Location Description: RIVER BEND
Sample collection date: 03/02/99
Lab submittal date: 03/03/99
Received by: DL
Parameter: OIL & GREASE,
Method reference: 9071A
Result : 194 MgAg
Date statted: 03/11/99
Time started: 06:0-0
Location code: SMM
Project account code: A
Sample collector: F.I. LAVALLE
Time: 14:37
Time: 12:10
Validated by: DC
SOXLET EXTRACT
MDh or eeaaj kj. SO-
Date finished. 03 99
Analyst: TIN
Parameter: TCLP EXTRACTION NON VOLATILEa
Method reference: SW846 1311 Unit: N/A
Result : complete MDU or s6n*tttvit7-:-A/A
Date started: 03/0-9/99 Date finished: 03715/99
Time started: 15:00 Analyst: TXL
Parameter.: A09E'DiIC (As) , TCLP
Method referees: SPA 200.8
lfesult : 0;. 00'T m r
Date started: 03/13/99
Time started: 13:00
MDL.-or senaitixfty4 .002
Date finished: Q31473/99
Analyst: JAD:
' Parameter;: BARIUM {Ba), TCLP
Method references': EPA 200.8
Result : 0.29 mgr/L
MDL-- or sensitivity: 005
Date started: 03/12/99 Date finished: X112/99
'
' Time started: 11:30 Analysts JAD

' Parameters CA011U M (Cd), TCLP
Method referenca: EPA 200.8
Unit: mg/L
Result: <?002 MDIr=or senett r .OQ2
:'
finished
Dati
shed
Date started: 03/12/99 .
Analyst :
' 'Funs started: 114 34
J

3 CO TEL:[phone] Mar 15'99 15:54 No.00?
' LAID
EASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL Sample I . D . BR3 2916 (cQnt.'?d.1_ .
Page : 2 ? - 1
Maash IrS, 124 ?_
' Parameter: CHROMIUM (Cr), TCLP
Method riefereaae: EPA 200.8
Result : -s-. 003
Date etaarted: 03f12/99
' Time starteds 11:30

ParameteF: LEBa (Pb), TCLP
Method reference : EPA 200.8
Result : is, 005
Date started: 0312/99
Time started: 11:30
Paramater: KNQW, TCLP
Method r31e*'=§ L- SPA 245.1
Result: x.06-43
Date ata?ted: 03/12/99
Time started: I'0:00
' Parameter: SELEMIM (Se), TCLP
Method referaaas ;- EPA 200.8
Result: <,005
Date ataited: C3/13/99
Time otaited: 13:00
' Parameter: SILVER (Ag), TCLP
Method rgferenm: EPA 200.8
Result : . -0fl5
Date started: 03/12/99
Time started: 11:30

Sample comments:
5MW= UPWA 4-7
Unit: mg/L
MIX or ssmisi -on
Date fininhad. 03/11/99
Analyst.: %TKEL. -
Unit: mg/L-
MDL or sonwitivie .003
Date f inter: n7=1"
Analyst: MU- -
Unit: mjfL
MD1 or am-WEdtisdo -02.
Dade f izishnd?0 19
Analysts Cif
Untt: mg/L
MDL or sensitivixy: .005
Date finishedr-031/13/99
Analyst: JAS
Unbt : mg/L
MDU or aanaftivlWi- .0.05
Dabe finisba& 034U/-9-4
AnaLlyst : JAD

If there 'are any questions regarding this. data, Ams;?ca 1.
ichard Spive
President

' LAW & CO... TEL:[phone] Mar 15'99 15:52 NO.UUM
' From: Lai- & CoMalLy of Wilmington, Inc. • _= - -
17il CA061a Street / PO Box 629
Wi 18tagr1,,.NC 28402 -
TEL: [phone] NC 37704 / WW 16
FA:C: 910-762-8785 SC 99049
March 15, 1999
Ta;r- EJ=ERaL NMENTAL - - - -
FA. LAVW,ffi
P.Q. Box 561
BR=379W 5C 28519
HUNH& - -

The following analytical results have been obtained for the
indicated sample which was submi tted to this laboratory:
Sample I.D. S*U917 Location code: EEMME
Purchase order number: RB399 Project account code: A
' Location Description: RIVER BEND Sample collector: F.X. LAVALLE
Sample collection date: 03/02/99 Time: 14:50
Lab submittal date: 03/03/99 Time: 12:10
Received Jay: DID Validated by: DC
Parameter: OIL & CREASE, SOXLET EXTRACT
r Method refersrus: 9071A
Result: 1,97 mg/kg MDL or sen-1 ivtty: 50
Date started: 03/11199 Date finiahad- 014ZA99
Time started: 08:00 Analyst : TAB!
Parameter: TCLP EXTRACTION NON VOLATILES
Method reference: SW846 1311 Unit: N/A
Result: complato MDL or sensitivity: N/A
Date started: Q3./09/99 Date finis 03110/99
Time started: 15:00 Analyst: TAM`

Parameter::. SIC (As) , TCLP
Method references: EPA 200.8
Result: 0'.007 tag/L MDL or sensitivity: .002
' Date stared: 03/13/99 Date finiahedf 53-/1-3=/99
Time started: 13:00 Analyst: JAD
t Parametsr?; AATUNN (Ra), TCLP = -
Method refers : E?A 200.8
Result: 0.38 mg/L MDL or sensitivity: _005
Date started: 03/12/99 Datq finished: Q 99
t Time started: 11:30 Analyst: JAIR
' Parameter; CADl=YA (Cd), TCLP
Method reference: EPA 200.8
Result: <;002
Data started: 03/12/99
' Time started: 11:30
Unit: mg/L
MDL or sensitivity. 002
Datd f inished: 43 94
Analyst: JAD

LAW '3 CO... TEL:[phone] Mar 15'99 15:52 No.uuu r.uo
EASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL Sample I.D. BR32917 (continund
_ Page : 2 -?-
4 -

11
t

r?

Parameter: CHEnM3:UM (Cr), TCLP
Method reference: EPA 200.8
Eaaul.t_: 0.0A3_mq, L
Date started: 03/12/99
Time started: 1100
Parameter: LEAD (Pb), TCLP
Method reference: EPA 200.8
Remit : c . 009-
Date started: 03/12/99
Time started: 11:30
Parameters NERD, TCLP
.Method referenr?: EPA 245.1
Date sta#ad: ®/112/99
Time staj;tad- 3.0:00
ParameteX: 9E1=IUM (Se), TCLP
Method rei terenem : EPA 200.8
Result: d.005 mg/L
Date started: 03/13/99
Time started: 13:00
Paramete q L S LLVZL (Ag) , TCLP
Method rdference: EPA 200.8
Result: <.005
Dat• started: 03/12/99
Time started: L3.:.30
Sample comment
MDL or •entittvtTr: .002
Dade finished: 01/32/99
Analyst: JAD
Unit: mg/L
MDL or sensitivity: .005
Dare fini,&WH.: 03/12/99
Analyst -. SAO
unit: MSZL-- _ _
MD4 or ewu6i tL . U
Dabe f in-i~: 09 bft2-/ l
Analyst: CO- -
MDL or sensitivity- .005
Date finished: 03--/13/99
Anaayst : J= -
Unit: mg/L
MDL• or eaeart-ttvttt- .005
Date finiahsd: 12199
Analyst: JW
sum= BWL6 L-i
,!scan .T Dum LAVALLI
If there are any questions regarding this data, please call.
w
Richard Spiv
President

/P . -

a - -
LAW.& CO... TEL:[phone] Mar 15'99
1
From: Law & Compaaiy of Wilmington, Inc.
1711 C&etle- Street / PO Box 629
Wilmington, NC 28402
TEL: [phone] NC 37704 / WW 16
FAX: [phone] SC 99049
March 15, 1999
To : FASTEN WriaRONMENTAL
F.X. LAVALLE
P.O. BOX se
B&IDG = 28519
8?88g
15:5U NO.uuo r.uo
The following analytical results have been obtained for the
indicated samplA which was submitted to this 7raboratery-
numle 11D. n9M9" Locatidn code: _=Wir
Purchase order number: RB399 Project account-codas A-
Location'Deecrtptton: RIVER BEND Sample.-collector: R.X. LAVALLE
Sample collection date: 03/02/99 Time: 15:20
Lab submittal date: 03/03/99 Time: 12:10
Received -by: DL- Validated by: DC
Pa[ratmetere: OIL' & (RUME, SOXLET EXTRACT
Method reference: 9071A
Result: 433 mg/kg MDL or sanaitivj.tV__ 50
Date started: a3/11/99 Date finished: 03/11/99
Time started: 011:040 Analyst: TAM
Parameter: TCLP EXTRACTION NON VOLATILES
Method reference: SN846 1311 Unit: N/A
Result : completes MDL• or senettivtty: N/A
Date started: 03/09/99 Date finished: 03/10/99
Time started: 19-00 Analyst : TAB[
- 1
Parameter: ARSMC (As), TCLP
Method reference: SPA 200.8
Result: 0.007 mfl/L MDL.or oenaitivity> .002
Date started: 01/13/99 Date finished: 03711/49
Time started: 13-:00 Analyst: JAU
Parameter; RARTUR.(Ba), TCLP
Method reference, EPA 200.8
Result: 0; 28 WtL
Dater started: CV=/99
Tim* started-- 11:34
MDL-or aensitimity-.ODS
Date finishes: 03/I2
Analyst : J=' Parameter; CAZKZUK (Cd), TCLP
Method references! ZPA 200.8
Result: <.002
Date stared: 03/12/99
Time started: 1x:30
Unit: mg/L
MDL or sennitiVJ4Lt 003
Date finished:- 3- J 93.
Analyst: JAa
J
?Am -adb: 7e "

t
t

LAW 8 CO... TEL:[phone] Mar 15'99 15:51 No.008 P.04
EASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL Sample I.D. BR32,918 (corxtintod)
Page: 2
Mar h 15 9
C 1 9-9
Parametar : CHROb l-UM (Cr) , TCLP
Method refesenI t: EPA 200.8
Reauult: i .0(32
Date started: 03/12/99
Time started: 11.30
Parameter: LEAD (Pb), TCLP
Method rlfereneer EPA 200.8
Rwmlt : ? . OQS
Data atarted,: Q3/11/99
Time started: U L10
Parameter : MMX3M, TCLP
Method rofereum : EPA 245.1
ROW41 t : t . 0012-
Date started: 03/12/99
Time started: I-000
Parameter: SELWn1M (Se), TCLP
Meffiiod rd germs! : -LPA 200.8
Result: 4-00S
Date started: 03/13/99
Tima ata3dte& 14--G0
Parameter: SILVER (Ag), TCLP
Method reference: EPA 200.8
Result: a.005
Date started: 03/12/99
Time staz'ed: 11:30
Unit: mg/L
MDli, or •empl.tj.vt .002
Date finished: 03/12/99
Analyst a JIM -
Unfit: mg/L
MDB or sensitivity- .005
Daie fini-eisd: Q27=/99
Analyst }
Unit: mg/L
MD& or aenmftiaify: .02
Date fini.skedi nZ-12/99
Analyst -1 W
Unft: mg/L
MDL or sensitivity: .005
Dade finishedz 01,W/99
Analyst- J7U -
Unit : mg4/L
MDL or senmitiviCIir: 005
Date finiahedr W:L2/"
Ana. yst : JAM
Sample comments
BLUD? 9711RL8 I? 4
14C=IVw R mox L?o1Qii- -
If there are any- cgitestions regarding this- data, pleases *all.
RicharSpivey
- -
President
t I ulil r'. 1-I1 TFI :9l?l-7h?-7(1R7 Mar 17'aG 1'?:1i7 Nn (111 P 111
From: Law & Company of Wilmington, Inc.
3.73r CtNeTa"Street /' PO Box 629 --?_
Wt1"1T1gt'?7i, -NC 28402 -
TEL: [phone] NC 37704 / WW 16
FAX: [phone] SC 99049
March 17, 1999
To : EASMRN UWZRONMENTAL
F Ili . LAVAU.Li
P-6. sorni
2R1aGET=,- KC 28519
EBT?NSE -
The following analytical results have been obtained for the
indicated sample which was submitted to this labarat .
Sample I.D. DR31919
Purchase order number: RB399
Location Description: RIVER BEND
Sample collection date: 03/02/99
Lab submittal date: 03/03/99
Received by: DU

1

Location code: EENNBS
Project account code: A
Sample collector: F.X. LAVALLE
Time: 15:50
Time: 12:10
Validated by: apt valtdned
Parameter: OIL & GREASE, SOXLET EXTRACT
Method refer: 9071A
Result. 385 mgYkq MDt or sensitivity:
Date started: 03/11/99 Daher fini,?imd; 03/12/99
Time-started: 08:00 Analyst: TAM
Parameter: TCLP E=RACTION NON VOLATILES
Method reference: SW846 1311 Unit: N/A
Result: complette-
Date started: 03/09/99 MDIr or sansitivtity: N/A

Time started: 15:00 Data finishads 03/10/99
Anaalyst: TAM
Parameter: ARSENIC (As), TCLP `
Method referenuoi SPA 200.8
Result: 0 , 0075 mg/ta
Date started: 03/13/99 MDL or sensitivity: .0-02

Time started: 13:00 Datze finished: 03/13/99
Analyst: JAD
Parameter: 3AR1MM (Ba.), TCLP
Method roF-ran XPA 200.8
Result: 0.20 mq/L
Date started: 03/12/99
Time started: 11:30
Parameter: CADMIUM (Cd), TCLP
Method refere=a: EPA 200.8
Result: <.002
Date started: 03/12/99
Time started: 11:3-0
MDL or sensitivity r, , 005
Date finished: 03/12/99
Analyst: JAD
Unix: mg/L
MDTe or sensitivity: .002
Data finished: 03/12/99
Analyst : JXIY
LHI,J CO... TEL:[phone] Mar 17'99 12:58 No.005 P-1-j-'
EASTERN ENVIRONMENTAL Sample I.D. BR32919 (continued)
Paces : 2
March 11, 199g '
Parameter: CHELGMIUM (Cr) TCL
P
Method reference: EPA 200.8
Result: <.ooz
-Date started: 03/12/99
Time started-. Ll.-30
Parameter: LEM (Pb), TCL?
Method reference: EPA 200.8
Result: c.0091,
1 Date started: 03/12/99
Time started: 11:30
Parameters MBitC-%13W, TCLP
Method refs-Imn a : EPA 245.1
PA&Wl t : , Q 016 mg/L
Date started: 03/1/99
Time started: 10:00
t
1

I
Parameter r SEIMILM4 (Se) , TCLP
Method referencv: EPA 200.8
Result: 0.01 mg?L
Date started: 03/13/99
Time started: 13:00
Parameter: SILVER (Ag), TCLP
Method- zw; 3PA 200.8
Result: <.005
Date started: 03-/12/99
Time started: 11:30
Sample comments:
U 4W= SM U L-LO
MKZZVC By D12M LAVALLI
Urii t : mV/L
MAL or "zUF-itiVl:tr-.- .002
Dete finishsd? 03/12/99
Arglyst : JW
Un4 t : mg/L_
MIX or sensitivit-yt- 005
Date finished: 03/12/99
Anglyst: JAn_ -
MD or atnai tIMIXV
4_ AOZ
Date finiabAdv 03/1:2141
Anilyst : Co.
_
MDL or sensitivity: .005
Dade finished:. Q3,/L3./94
Analyst: JAD
Unit: mg/L
MDL or eenmauvtt
Dalfe finished: 03/ ],Z/g.g
An4lyst : JBM
If there are any questions regarding this data, please call.
W S y
ichard Spivey
President
F.
r
LAW & CO... TEL:[phone] Mar 15'99 15:49 No.008 P.01
From: Law & Company of Wilmington, Inc.
17V Caz44L-.8treet / PO Box 629 - - -
Ei irypgol,? ETC 28402
-? --
TELs 910-702-7082 NC 37704 / WW 16
PAZ: 91 6•r78t-8785 SC 99049
March 15, 1999
To : 9AATERff IMMONMENTAL
F.X. LAVML9
BR4UCWVW RC 28519
The follgwing_ ana.]?ytical results have bean obtained fta~bh&
indicated sampl* which was submitted to this laboratory:
=3192V Location cote : ]3EPR8E
Purehasa order msmber: RB399 Project account cod . A
Location beeeription: RIVER BEND Sample collector: 7AC. LAVALLE
Sample collection date: 03/02/99 Time: 16:25
Lab-- submit & L 03/03/99 Time: 12:10
Received, bl: Wa validated by: Ir
Parameter: OIL & GREASE, SOXLET EXTRACT
Method re6ereum: 9071A
Reaalt : 34X8 mM(kg MDL: or sen&itLv- W;. 50
na.ta stastsd) W11/99 Date fin-ished-r 03 -Z/9.5
Time started: W.- OO Analyst : TAB -
Parameter.: TCLP EXTRACTION NON VOLATILES
Msthod referer=W: SW846 1311 Unit : NIA
MDtr or
Date started: 03/09/99 Date fin#.shadL 43,A=9.9-
Time started: ].T. 00 Analyst : TAM
Parameters-ABBMC (As), TCLP
Method ref ers?e?=SPA 200.8
- - --
Result: 01,008 mg/L- MDL or sensitivity:
.002
Dst* smarted: 0 1 /99 -
Data finf,sl?I -T9
Time start,sd : 13508 Analyst : JAjr _
Parameter; BAR= (Ba), TCLP
Method raf4r6=4P EPA 200.8
Result: 0:38 mg/-L
Date started; 0113.2/99
Time trtarted : it: 3'II
Parameter; CAD11 M4- (Cd) , TCLP
Method referent=:-EPA 200.8
Result : 41002
Da[tt started: 03/12/99
Time started: I= 38

005
MDL or sensitivQa;99
Date finiehad- Analyst: JAD`
Unit: mg/L
MDIs or eansttiE -0@2 .
Datdt finfeFle
d: 9S
Analyst : _J=_r
LAID & CO... TEL:[phone] Mar 15'99 15:5U NO.UUM r.U2
' EASTERN ENVIRONMBNTAL Sample I.D. BR32920 (continued)
Karch 15i 1991
' Parameter: CAROG7aM (Cr), TCLP
- Me !hod rtfezan :-EPA 200.8 Unit: mg/L
milt': 4,004- MDE or sensitivity: .002
Dates a-tarted. 03/12/99 Date finished: QVW99
Time started: 11:30 Analyst: JAD
Parameter.- LBUTI, (lb) , TCLP
' Method releream.-EPA 200.8 Unit: mg/L
Result : 4.0.09 MDt or aens,itivrity_._ _QO5
Data stazteed. 013/T2/99 Date fininhod: GVL2/99
' Time started; 11:30 Analystr JAD
Parametet. MERCURY, TCLP
Method r jf erenu=,._EPA 245.1
Result: ..Q002 tR/L MDra or aenaiti .0?
Date started: 03/392/99 Date finished: 03;12/99
Time started: 1D:QO Analyst: CO
' Paramater -_ 93rd MM (Se), TCLP
Me thad rd fit : EPA 200.8
_
Refalt- 0,007' peg/tr MDZ or 9ens1x-Xv_f1*; 005
Date startedt Q3/LV99 Date
7i.ata starteda 12 :04 Anadyst . JIM
Parameter: 2l6VZi -(Ag), TCLP
Method re rases: EPA 200.8 Unit : mg/L
-Result <}.DQS y MDU or serartt OU5
Dats stated: 63/12/99 Data finished: ?-1ZJ99
Time started: 11:30 Analyst : JAE1
Sample cotemerrte : _ -
PAM= 2r 080a 1AVM&AL--
.If there are any questions regarding this data, please call.
icharl! Spivey
' President -
t
W afi
00 uj
~o
WV)-~o g w
D Z W
W a
1
N<om u
c w9wo~'~ z
Of a < " r~ W m
o0I LLI O~
o w
Zw~x~ a ~Qsp o C.D oz
W t)wV?OW <0, .4 p = ~
G jQQQWWcr~ 2 4 W h I-A
J m ~
W W 2 N ~ < YJ .O p p z aac°S ,
ZOO = L;j
F F. J x 8~ < j 4t s ' ~~yy ee~~ yy~~ oo C~ Nh f Ntp 1~ ~I Z J J J J J ~J J J ~J J J J J J J J o i m z s.,
> mwzXwom ?-~F~ i
3 r <WOWOMa-jr < ~d
O mOE zz gga J m a' InO, l
g Z w<tz <5 a oW ~.1 QJ.-
p oaW~ZNQa aJ$d Z U w
U 4 < m z W Ckf Z w LLJ lL M m lQi ~??snJ.~efgb~ w.
1= ~0rxZa : W 9Q8
CL w o .10< cZ 0a
O W ONO> m p~<Of W) 0 dOJ< w v m ' O,,,o Off' . ` It
mar aZ <W a~owW3 4.Qw ? {;4~ ~s.r OwZ • • , -1 ~r p'
U r_n (Ym • • ? A`rrQ.`
Ioz Qoo oow°wV}
O0UFF~wZ
- jF 1 ' 1 f f ? ? f 1 ? f ? '
O~=)WOD :7 2 0.0~Zwmu-<O
m}X0 oV) 0:oomw
WOrNW0OOwx >W ~pOW<0 1,
< \
0'~Z ~Q ~ zWz= F<u,o-ate o <3r
gyp. / d~ + ? • ? ? • • ~A ? • • • ? ? ? • r • ? ?hi"
zoooo o
NIP
ilia
car %
1N3113SV3 MfWM ,04 / s~yhe tl,.~.~ 4r0 s. • 0` . ? • ~A x000000 1 ? ? ? • • • • • + + ?
It St 6 i s • f ? y m t \ ? • • • • ? ?
S 2020'46' E (pWl 007U M Cf,9LOZ N m OD • • ? ? t ? ? ? ? ?
•q Y rj f fit.,
80.1 W9 0
FU
- - - - -
1

ti 0%
114' v • ar1~
\ o~ g sd 1 NIP ~ O
/0' 4qc
Z
cow LLJ
H LLI
•1' 1 ~Z~F v, s 1 `~A~ Q'
44, n
~O 1 1 ai o Z
ra ~ L.Li z0
O w
1 I Gg V C)
$w o a w c~ F->
W ` / / r I }y NN nN ' ~Pg1 Za
Z O S s~.~... Q~tZj ta. -3 W
\ I I , Y I U3 F- l~-.~x~t CAP a~ ` z C'! Q Qt`y
OD leg fw
fi
z it tt a u,- n u z 'S *w
lop
~ c°n` tC3 3 -C U o ,
Lu CN n t 1n co r~ 00, 0) 0
~w I 1~
r
x x
x ~r` t tp~~ t`2e
4 R, 2
,e -,~Y #a k ;v,j fir`: 1~i+esn: r D , r y fr F S- 7 w
~'tiFlk~` , ~ ~r,. ip y Y~ J ;rC <<~~ L x } a

. ~ ~ I
! V
V z~ . ?
H t
w ~ tD D < 00 W +L w
- rn. Z 3 ~ ~ I 1. C1 M
~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~
10• ~ < OnD 01 W 3~W Opp O r r 1"" W ~ 1 t~
J }F w W w
U H p fn m * 2 !n O s. r
oaz w ~ ~ ,.r Qc~Qw w z ~o ~ ~ ~ W. fr'~ , ~ } ' e~ r . i a ~ ~ h ~
o w z j ~ ~ o s r~ . Q m r w ~w~: caw,
~ I ~ a ~z ~ ~ ~ o z ~ z ~ ' ~
< w- ~ $ wo~ < ~ I-- r Q ~ W ~ < Z 01 I m ~ ~ ~
S ° ! N a w I W la. to v? F- tq to r- m v ~ rM h r ~ r,~••
D= 0 < <~< ~ J ~ V)~ yW2~; < ~ ~ ~ C~= < r r r w ~n
z ~ a ~ ~ o U _ _ o ~ ~ ~ b r ~ m c~ Z~ ~ ~ ~ ~G ~ r m ~ -
. ~a?-2~-z F ~ f/) - O dUF~ 1' 2Z Z Z ~ ~ y~ mU V ~ ~ +
W -WV UW F a a v ~ x wwQ < ~ Q ~ U W V~ ~ w ~~G1M
W ti. li W tll 2 J D c0 l~. Q l.~ ~W Nz ~ < r`r ~N '~.:r 'c~ri d 'ti ~ ~
- W ~WJ W ~ rZZ I WVO ~ < z o Q ~ a ~ ~a° O JQQ ~ ~ ~zz > r N~ N M~~ N r~ n ~i I ~ + n ~ ~j , z a ~
Q O N ~ a ~ a
WWmON Q S 2 .vi _ ~ F ~r/^~ >W(~ZN Q dU< pp~ yJ O W ~ ~ prNn~~f1~OP ~ ~ Z ~~yyN~ ~~pp 0.
• o o ~ ~ f- ZOO Im N u1r;< pp F. QNO~ -V1 ~ • ~JJJJ~nJJ.7~J~ j^rrr.+.- ~ m W ~ ~ J J J J J J J I a,
F w N t O Q ~ a k a ~ ~ ~ g~ ~ ~ i
LD J - ~ w rY h ~ t~ c x i ~ ~ MM
} Qw wa = O < z~w00 z < ~ UU~Om J~ tL W ~~N ~ 3 Ow O~. ~ } N ~1
w ~a ~WZz < J O ~ a s ~i w Q~aow v, ~ I- N
~ ~ z yy,, ~ z Q ~ ~ a • Z UZ ~ O ~ O aw ~ Q. 8~ZZ O ~ Z U W ~ `1j1?r~r?r?1/?
H Vr O N Q W W O W Q D ~~~ti
Q p~ } w ~ tna ~~..mo~ , $ a ~ < ~
~ w? rZ ZW oa~a cn 5 Jf- aQ~oa z _oc • n. -wcn3wa ~O ~ ~ ~'~z Z _ r~ro~' n
~ °~--Wa Z w -~zz °C x2 - Q~ ~m»~~ . w U .Q'a3 m ~N:
O .w OnjO> U ~ ~ o r 1-' ~ , ~ s
~~'-zQa`~o~Q Q W ' ~ c 0;
w a w II ~ Qw o 3 ~ ~ ~ W Z ? ? ~ A,~,, Q.. Q. U - ? ? ? 1,
Q V~.~Q'Ir%j 00 2ZWOIlif- -~O ~ Q ~ ~ ? ? ? ? ? ? U rim ~ ~ ? ? ? • ? 1
-Ow ~ }QOZ 5 O (n U. F- ~ J Z
~-p- f"ZZIi.- ~ ~
OUZ>-f'~O- f- ~ Ow 00 ~ W~
c3 a a ~ W~L?.QO
~,aooma ~ m~OOW V w
wa~Op cnwa Q>w~oOwQa
w~o_ O~..wwcn ~OZ JQLY _ ~ ~ / ~ ? / ? / ? ? ? ? 1 • ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 1 1 1
wQ li.~Q F- • ? ? ? • ?
; ~r i ~ i ~ ti ~ .
zoooo o i~ i ~ ~ ? ? 1 ? ? • ? ? • ? • ? ? 1 1 ? ? • 1 ~ i
i /,q
i~~/ ~ s i yM ? ? ? 1 ? • ? ? • ? ? ? • 1 ? ?
1 i~ ~ ~
~ i'' ~p ~
~ 1v ? • ? ?K1 m ? ? 1 ? 1 ? ? • ? ? • ? ? • ? • 1
to , ~ ~'`P add •s • B~•l ~ ~ ~
r r Q • . _Y.~ ~ x__. _ . ~ M
~ i / 1 1 / ~
~1 / 1N3YV35`d3 a3M3S ,Oti . ~ g . ~ ~ ~ ~ `0 +
i 1 1 ..r • ? • v +
S 20'20'46` E (~°10#),00'BLl M ,££,91.OZ N .e-'r ' ~ 1 r • + ~ Mp g O r Z .O
~ 60.1 ' 31114 13Aba9 ~
~ 1 ~ v
r ~ ~ ~ ~ 2~ ~ ox ~
r
q~~ o a
tal `
i \ 0 ~ ! 2 ~ s ~ 't~° o~ ~
/ r O ~ a ti~k~ _
~ V _ ~ / ~ t o . ,,y3 ~~{6
~ k d 0 0 ~ ~ 0
~ ~ ~d I o
~ \ O~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ i ~ p
~ ~ r~ ~
~ ~ `f' ~ r
7 Y ~ Z W
~ ~ ~ 2 1 6
r ~6 W 8 ~
2 0 ~ ~ N 1 Q
~ ti 1 , o;al ~ s. t ~ opl ~otd d
a ~ 1 li U
v~/ l O
5.,s w?
Nk Z©
J W ~
' 0. ~ w w~ p d w t~ Z w
~ / I 'N O o ~d ~ ~ ~ Qw (~Z 00 ~ W W J W
f~' ~ . ~ N / r ~ J (n N ~ 5 Q, ~ w ~ ~P Z _ w 1 ~ ~ 6 g 0~' U U
W ~ E 5~ ~ n. w ~ to o g y ~y ~ O
a- gP p+ 0~ _ d~0.o J ~ ~ ~ 0 fly' ~ Z Q Z ©Z Z
~ 1 \ ~ z _ v, w rn ~ F gG ~ ~ w Z ~ V ~ r w P~ ~t P ~ ~ 4. r- O
~ ~ I w ~ "'r~ ~ G 04' Q ~2CJ . ~ 't y1 RP Z ~ p cl) F ~,P 4 G ~ C7 V) ~ w .
x ac ~ Jmw >az Q ~ X ~mW cn3cr t=~tt wwZ g
$ I ~ . ~ m ~ go xw III p a
°sa,~ 7 3mo za U1 W P ~ I ~ O m U zQ n wz II d Z C7 ~ II II JI W ~ ~ II II
~ ' ~ Z Z P I ~ W ~p ~ o I o 0 a ~ r II II ~ li it II
0 ~ ~ J ~ . Q g ~ \d
r?d I Q p a i5 { a Z ~cn ~a~ Qv w~0
~n ~ ~ I ~ . W N ~ d tf) (0 I~ 00 ~ Ch d r
a JOOOOO~QO O O~"
W ' \
1 JIM
1 4