Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutNC0020761_wasteload allocation_19931208NPDES WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION PERMIT NO.: NCO020761 PERWITEE NAME: Town of North Wilkesboro FACILITY NAME: Town of North Wilkesboro WWTP Facility Status: Existin Permit Status: Renewal Major Minor Pipe No.: 001 Design Capacity: 1.0 MGD Domestic (% of Flow): 94 % Industrial (% of Flow): 6 % Comments: =treatment information re ueste . RECEIVING STREAM: the Yadkin River Class: C Sub -Basin: 03-07-01 Reference USGS Quad: C 14 NW (please attach) County: Wilkes Regional Office: Winston-Salem Regional Office Previous Exp. Date: 4/30/94 Treatment Plant Class: III Classification changes within three miles: none Requested by: Sean D. Goris Date: 9/27/93 Prepared by: Date: 1-2 ! 9 Reviewed by: Date: % 02 Modeler, Date Rec. # sA--'rA3' 917_21J3 1 Drainage Area (mi`) S,2(o Avg. Streainflow (cfs): 6 8,3_ 7Q10 (cfs) /q(® Winter 7Q10 (cfs) a67 30Q2 (cfs) 3,93 Toxicity Limits:IWC 78 % LC.�"O Acute hronic 7aPtiwdd qS 6r Instream Monitoring: s AN , APR, s uL, o CT Parameters -Cc a( Co Upstream ✓ Location �, s-� ,. Downstream Location 100 Is „-sue c- Characteristics BOD5 (mg/1) NH3-N (mg/1) D.O. (mg/1) TSS (mg/1) F. Col. (/100 ml) PH (SU) Comments: t, FACT SHEET FOR WASTELOAD ALLOCATION Facility Name: NPDES No.: Type of Waste: Facility Status: Permit Status: Receiving Stream: Stream Classification: Subbasin: County: Regional Office: Requestor: Date of Request: Topo Quad: Request # 7608 Town of North Wilkesboro WWTP NCO020761 Domestic/ Industrial Existing Renewal Yadkin River C 03-07-01 Wilkes Winston-Salem Sean Goris 9/27/93 C14NW Wasteload Allocation Summary OCT 20 1993 Winston -Salle 1 Regional Office Stream Characteristic: USGS # dz►izo0( Date: rz,/c 3 Drainage Area (mi2): 526 Summer 7Q10 (cfs): 196 Winter 7Q10 (cfs): 267'° ' Average Flow (cfs): 683-�'"• t 30Q2 (cfs): 393 ' IWC (%): 0.78 Dilution:127:1 s '- {approach taken correspondence with region EPA etc ) Renewal per Yadkin Riverpasin schedule. This is a five year� e_ rmit. Passing 0.A s,1v4• toxicity tests. Drop copper monitoring requiremeMcopper leve s in effluent are insignificant (self -monitoring and ppa). A fecal coliform limit should be added based on new Divisional procedures and instream monitoring data. Special Schedule Requirements and additional comments from Reviewers: Recommended by: - Date: !�11_3 Bets nson Reviewed by Instream Assessment: Date: 0 /5 Regional Supervisor: Date: Permits & Engineering: - Date: NOV 16 1993 RETURN TO TECHNICAL SERVICES BY: CONVENTIONAL PARAMETERS Existing Limits: Wasteflow (MGD): BOD5 (mg/1): NH3N (mg/1): DO (mg/1): TSS (mg/1): Fecal Col. (/100 ml): PH (SU): Residual Chlorine (µg/1): Oil & Grease (mg/1): TP (mg/l): TN (mg/1): Recommended Limits: Wasteflow (MGD): BOD5 (mg/1): NH3N (mg/1): DO (mg/1): TSS (mg/1): Fecal Col. (/100 ml): PH (SU): Residual Chlorine (µg/1): Oil & Grease (mg/1): TP (mg/1): TN (mg/1): Ionthly Average 1 30 monitor 30 monitor 6-9 monitor monitor Monthly Average 30 monitor �h 30 200 6-9 28 *dechlorinatic monitor monitor Limits Changes Due To: Change in 7Q10 data Change in stream classification Relocation of discharge Change in wasteflow Other (onsite toxicity study, interaction, etc.) Instream data New regulations/standards/procedures New facility information or alternate disinfection Parameter(s_Affected Fecal, Cl (explanation of any modifications to past modeling analysis including new flows, rates, field data, interacting discharges) Type of Toxicity Test: Existing Limit: Recommended Limit: Monitoring Schedule: Existing Limits Copper (ug/1): Sit~ �u9�►�: Recommended Limits Copper (ug/1): TOXICS/METALS Acute, quarterly Daphnid 48 hr LC50 78% j'p', A PA -I tk L , OCT- Limits Changes Due To: Change in 7Q10 data Relocation of discharge Change in wasteflow New pretreatment information Failing toxicity test Other (pollutant scan) Daily max WQ or EL monitor ww%z4-.r- Daily max WQ or EL Parameters Affected Parameter(s) are water quality limited. For some parameters, the available load capacity of the immediate receiving water will be consumed. This may affect future water quality based effluent limitations for additional dischargers within this portion of the watershed. X' No parameters are water quality limited, but this discharge may affect future allocations. INSTREAM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Upstream Location: 50 yds upstream Downstream Location: 100 yds downstream Parameters: Fecal Coliform Special instream monitoring locations or monitoring frequencies: , y MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION & SPECIAL CONDITIONS Adequacy of Existing Treatment Has the, facility demonstrated the ability to meet the proposed new limits with existing treatment facilities? Yes No L� If no, which parameters cannot be met? FECOL Would a "phasing in" of the new limits be appropriate? Yes V No If yes, please provide a schedule (and basis for that schedule) with the regional office recommendations: If no, why not? �.' th 1 4 Wasteload sent to EPA? (Major) -,&L (Y or N) (If yes, then attach schematic, toxics spreadsheet, copy of model, or, if not modeled, then old assumptions that were made, and description of how it fits into basinwide plan) Additional Information attached? _� (Y or N) If yes, explain with attachments. Facility Name ww vF /�(onrtf �cic�s8orz o tv i' Permit # A16n 20 ! Pipe # 5- r ACUTE TOXICITY PERMIT LIMIT (QRTRLY) The permittee shall conduct acute toxicity tests on a awrWrb basis using protocols defined as definitive in E.P.A. Document 600/4-85/013 entitled 'The Acute Toxicity of Effluents to Freshwater and Marine Organisms." The monitoring shall be performed as a D hni pulex or feriodaphnia 48 hour static test, using effluent collected as a 24 hour composite. The LC50 of this effluent using the previously stated methodology may at no time in any toxicity test be less than 7K%. Effluent samples for self -monitoring purposes must be obtained during representative effluent discharge below all waste treatment. The first test will be performed afWr &LOL&US from the effective date of this permit during the months of j M. ,. A \a o c The parameter code for this test if using Daphnia pulex is TAA3D. The parameter code for this test if using erida hni is TAA3B. All toxicity testing results required as part of this permit condition will be entered on the Effluent Discharge Monitoring Form (MR-1) for the month in which it was performed, using the appropriate parameter code. Additionally, DEM Form AT-1 (original) is to be sent to the following address: Attention: Environmental Sciences Branch North Carolina Division of Environmental Management 4401 Reedy Creek Road Raleigh, N.C. 27607 Test data shall be complete and accurate and include all supporting in association with the toxicity tests, as well as all dose/resposedt.c Total residualchlorinechlorine of thsical e efts fluent toxicity ity sample must be measured and reported if chlorine is employed for disinfection of the waste stream. Should any single quarterly monitoring indicate a failure to Meet specified limits, then monthly monitoring will begin immediately until such time that a single test is passed: Upon passing, this monthly test requirement will revert to quarterly in the months specified above. Should any test data from either these monitoring requirements or tests performed by the North Carolina Division of Environmental Management indicate potential impacts to the receiving stream, this permit may be re -opened and modified to include alternate monitoring requirements or limits. NOTE: Failure to achieve test conditions as specified in the cited document, such as minimum control organism survival and appropriate environmental controls, shall constitute an invalid test and will require immediate retesting(within 30 days of initial monitoring event). Failure to submit suitable test results will constitute noncompliance with monitoring requirements. 7Q 10 ! I cfs Permitted Flow __L,. o MGD IWC 6.7 ff % Basin & Sub -basin 03- 07 - o I Receiving Stream a ; n -River— County e QAL Daphnid 48 Version 10191 Recommended by: Date /0 l r �/q Z /9z. ., %1 z /7z 1 f97- 1 o j42. ly 143- (J��I 3 7�9 3 3/ 3 ffl� RVpY:- At �p /Ov -2 y 3c 9� g, 7v5/ a5-3 3 4/;Z S-0 a -7sq 7.7 (3 3 aq,a 00 1-30 X,40keA) ,Z 1-7C l_I�2-3 137 Z 2 e-ao ,4', aS',0C,v % ,� o rIU;ee, 'Zll�- w-sv4t dram. Gs-� ecc�c� 1 Wo CY co NPDES PRETREATMENT INFORMATION REQUEST FORM r FACILITY NAME: 06-"n+ fuw77 NPDES NO. NCO Z Q % b r r WT�lSTbrI -- � REQUESTER: 5"A o s DATE: / Z 7/ l93 REGION: 5 t r r r r r • �,•, ... . . �,• ,. This facility has no SIUs and should not have pretreatment language. This facility should and/or is developing a pretreatment program. Please include the following conditions: Program Development r Phase I due _J / Phase II due r Additional Conditions r (attached) t This facility is currently implementing a pretreatment program. ,.- ,.;; -j Please include the following conditions: t Program Implementation `m ; 1.� Additional Conditions (attached) SIGNIFICANT INDUSTRIAL USERS' (SIUS) CONTRIBUTIONS SIU FLOW - TOTAL: r r - ODMPOSITION: MGD' r � r METAL FINISHING: MGp ' r ' i OTHER: MCA r ' MGM r r ' r ' r M ' r ' r ! HEM,JORKS REVIEW • • : t ula1Y�IC Cd Cr cu Ni Pb Zn CN Phenol Other -+ PASS ' r THROUGH DAILY LOAD IN LBS/DAY ACTUAL r r �\ ALLOWABLE DOMESTIC PEFda= INDUSTRIAL % REMOVAL cr, rer; a 6 .200� - Z OQZ7 -J' �0//3 2 Qf.�rl� _ 4 O .1 0 6 . oys ols7 se-1/, _OOYS 64P-Aflidr No fir; YPri . Od..5r' . O % O Ivi