20191242 Ver 1_Response to USACE incomplete notice_20191130

Strickland, Bev
From: Krissina Newcomb <[e-mail]>
Sent: Saturday, November 30, 2019 3:36 PM
To: Lastinger, James C CIV USARMY CESAW (USA); [e-mail]
Cc: Goss, Stephanie
Subject: [External] Re: Summerdale II PCN, incomplete notice, SAW-2019-02106
Attachments: Coley_Farm_DWR_Stream_Form.pdf, Coley_Farm_USACE_Data _Forms.pdf,
Coley_Farm_PJD_Form.pdf, Coley_Farm_PJD_Map.pdf, summerdalell_Site Plan
USACOE_2019-11-30.pdf
ail. Do not click links or open attachments unless you verifvA9M&d all suspicious email as an attachment to
Re: USACE AID SAW-2019-02106 NCDWR Project 9 20191242 Ver 1
The following information and attached maps are provided as requested by USACE (email dated 10/30/19) and
NCDWR (email dated 11/5/19).
1. Jurisdictional features (streams and wetlands) were delineated by Alex Adams. I have attached the
supporting documents for a preliminary jurisdictional determination (PJD). The map depicts the jurisdictional
features within a defined project area, to include part of the western half of the site (where the existing sewer
line and proposed stormwater basin are). Wetland determination data forms and a PJD form are also attached.
These files are named Coley_Farm*.pdf
2. A revised impact map is attached (summerdaleII Site Plan USACOE_2019-11-30.pdf). The plan has been
modified to reduce wetland impacts by moving one of the lots from the northern side of Varina Towns Drive to
the southern side. Also, wetlands in the common area have been removed from the proposed impacts. Proposed
wetland impacts have been reduced to 0.23 acre.
3. Avoidance and Minimization Measures:
(a) The road could not be sited perpendicular to the stream due to the narrow width of the property in that
location. A perpendicular road alignment was considered, as suggested, but reduced the total lot count by 15%
which is below a financially viable threshold for the project.
(b) A lot has been moved to a location requiring fewer wetland impacts.
(c) the road shoulder slopes at the wetland crossing will be constructed at a 2:1 slope (2ft run to lft rise).
(d) Heavy vinyl protection fencing will be installed to protect wetlands during construction, as indicated on
the map.
(f) Wetlands in the common area have been removed from the proposed impacts.

Krissina Newcomb
Hal Owen & Associates, Inc.
PO Box 400, Lillington NC 27546
910-893-8743 www.halowensoil.com
Find us on Facebook at www.facebook.com/halowensoil
On 10/30/2019 12:12 PM, Lastinger, James C CIV USARMY CESAW (USA) wrote:
Krissina,
I have reviewed the PCN for Summerdale II, and have determined it to be
incomplete. Please address the following in order for me to proceed with PCN
review:
1. Your PCN indicated a delineation by others was performed for the site. It
appears that there is no record of a delineation that was ever submitted in
our files, and no delineation, data forms, and appropriate paperwork in the
form of a JD request packet was submitted with the PCN. Please submit this
information for Corps concurrence. Please keep in mind that a site visit
will required in order to verify potential aquatic resources on site. Once a
delineation packet has been submitted I will contact you to schedule a site
visit.
2. Your impact maps are unclear, as I am not able to determine the impact
areas associated with this permit application. It also appears that stream
channels and wetlands will be impacted that are currently not accounted for
within the PCN. Specifically, based on your submitted plans there appears to
be unaccounted wetland impacts for lots 7-9, unaccounted wetland impacts for
sewer line connection below the proposed stormwater BMP, and unaccounted
wetland impacts from fill slopes for the BMP itself. Please clarify, and
include these impacts if necessary.
Your stream channel impacts associated with this project in the wetland area
proposed for impacts for Varina Towns Drive are unclear and inconsistent. The
culvert is not shown on all plan sheets, nor was a cross section of the
culvert submitted (please submit). While the pipe length is shown at 78 feet,
it also appears that addition stream channel length above and below the
culvert will be filled. Please clarify.
Until these impacts are quantified this office will be unable to determine if
the project qualifies for the use of a NWP or if a standard permit will be
required, or if additional mitigation may be required.
3. Please clearly demarcate the boundary of the project on all plans
submitted to this office. Please consistently label all jurisdictional
features on your submitted plans. Please use a graphic scale on all impact
maps so that impact lengths can be measured. It is currently unclear where
wetland boundaries, project boundaries, stream channels, or impact areas
exist on the site.
4. Your avoidance and minimization statement is insufficient. Please submit
further information regarding why the roadway could not be designed to cross
the stream channel at a perpendicular angle, or the use of headwalls (thereby
reducing stream impact lengths), and the need for the proposed number of lots
necessitating lot fill.
Please submit the above information within 30 days of receipt of this
Notification or we will consider your application withdrawn and close the
file. I will be out of the office the remainder of the week on vacation.
When I return I will try to get further information regarding the mitigation
2

bank site from our Mitigation POC in the office (unfortunately she is out of
the office all week as well), and update you on my findings.
Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns regarding the above
requested information.
James Lastinger
Regulatory Project Manager
Raleigh Regulatory Field Office
US Army Corps of Engineers, Wilmington District
ADDRESS: 3331 Heritage Trade Drive, Suite 105 Wake Forest, NC 27587
Tel: [phone], x32
Cell: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
3

NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: 7-13-19
Project/Site: Coley Farm
Latitude: 35.584315
Evaluator: A. Adams
County: Wake
Longitude:-78.811823
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent 34.00
if >_ 19 or perennial if? 30
Stream Determination (circle one)
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennial
Other
e.g. Quad Name: Fuquay-Varina
A. Geomorphology Subtotal = 15.0)
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
18. Continuity of bed and bank
0
1
2 •
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
in
2 •
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ripple -pool sequence
0 O
10
2 Q
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0 01
2 •
3
5. Active/relict floodplain
0
1 0
2
3 •
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2 •
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0 0
1 •
2
3
8. Headcuts
0 •
1
2
3
9. Grade controls
0
0.5 •
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5 •
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
No = 0 •
Yes = 3
I Man-made ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
B. Hydrology (Subtotal = 9L-5)
12. Presence of Baseflow
00
10
2
3 •
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
00
10
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1 •
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5 •
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
00
0.5
1 •
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes '= 3 •
C. Biology (Subtotal =9.50)
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3 •
2 0
1
Q
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3 •
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1 •
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0 •
1
2
3
22. Fish
0 •
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
0.5 •
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
0.5 •
1
1.5
25. Algae
0 •
0.50
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; ®
OBL = 1.5
(F) Other = 0
" perennial streams may also be identified using other methods.
See p. 35 of manual
Notes:
Sketch:

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 131 Coley Farm Road City/County: Wake Sampling Date: 7/13/2019
Applicant/Owner: Prime 1 Builders, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: WA -UP
Investigator(s): A. Adams Section, Township, Range: Fuquay-Varina
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.) Side slope Local Relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 2
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR-P Lat: 35.584714 Long:-78.81199 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: FrB - Fuquay loamy sand, 0-6% NWI Classification: PFO
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes 0 No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? NO Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes NO ❑
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? NO (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map snowing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No 0 within a wetland? Yes ❑ No 0
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No 0
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply):
❑
Surface Soil Cracks (66)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
❑
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
❑ High Water Table (A2)
❑
Marl Deposits (615) (LRR U)
❑
Drainage Patterns (1310)
❑ Saturation (A3)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
❑ Water Marks (61)
❑
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
❑
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
❑
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (63)
❑
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (64)
❑
Thin Much Surface (0)
❑
Geomorphic Position (132)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
❑
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
❑ Water -Stained Leaves (69)
❑
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRRT, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No
❑
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes ❑ No
❑
Depth (inches):
Saturation Present? Yes ❑ No
❑
Depth (inches):
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ❑ No 0
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2

VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WA -UP
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30-ft )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
Acer rubrum
25
y
FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 11
(A)
2.
Pinus taedo
25
y
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Acer rubrum
10
FACW
Species Across All Strata: 12
(B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 92%
(A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
60
= Total Cover
OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
Sapling Stratum (Plot size: 30-ft )
FACW species 40 x 2 = 80
1.
Nyssa sylvatica
5
y
FAC
FAC species 70 x 3 = 210
2.
Liquidambar styraciflua
5
y
FAC
FACU species 5 x 4 = 20
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 115 (A) 310
(B)
5.
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.7
7.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
10
= Total Cover
❑ 1. Rapid test for hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30-ft )
0 2. Dominance Test is > 50%
1.
Liquidambar styraciflua
5
y
FAC
❑ 3. Prevalence Index is15 3.0'
2.
Nyssa sylvatica
5
y
FAC
❑ 4. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
Ligustrum sinense
5
y
FAC
4.
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
6.
7.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
15
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30-ft )
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
1.
Lonicera japonica
10
y
FAC
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
2.
Smilax rotundifolia
5
y
FACU
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
3.
Vitis spp.
5
y
FAC
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
4.
Arundinaria tecta
5
y
FACW
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
5.
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
6.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
7.
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
8.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
9.
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
10.
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
11.
ft (1 m) in height.
12.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
25
= Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratui (Plot size: 30-ft )
1.
Vitis spp.
5
y
FAC
2.
Hydrophytic
3.
Vegetation Yes 0 No ❑
4.
Present?
5
=Total Cover
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2

SOIL
Sampling Point: WA -UP
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators).
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc'
Texture Remarks
0-5
10YR 4/2 100
LS
4-9
10YR 6/4 100
SL
9-15+
10YR 6/6 100
SCL
'Type C = Concentration, D = depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, CS = Covered or Coated Sand Grains
2Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S,T,U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
Li
Histic Epipedon (A2)
Li
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
Li
Black Histic (A3)
Li
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (1`18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
Li
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
Li
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
Li Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P,S,T)
Li
Stratified Layers (AS)
U
Depleted Matrix (F3)
Li Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
Li
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P,T,U)
Li
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
Li
S cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P,T,U)
LJ
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Li Red Parent Material (TF2)
Li
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
Li
Redox Depressions (F8)
Li Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T,U)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P,T)
Li
Marl (1`10) (LRR U)
Li Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Li
Depleted Ochric (F11) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (1`12) (LRR O,P,T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 15OA:
❑
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P,T,U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
Li
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR O,S)
❑
Delta Ochric (1`17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Li
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
Li
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
Li
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C,
153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P,S,T,U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ❑ No 0
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region
Project/Site: 131 Coley Farm Road City/County: Wake Sampling Date: 7/13/2019
Applicant/Owner: Prime 1 Builders, LLC State: NC Sampling Point: WA -WET
Investigator(s): A. Adams Section, Township, Range: Fuquay-Varina
Landform: (hillslope, terrace, etc.) Floodplain Local Relief (concave, convex, none): none Slope (%): 0
Subregion (LRR or MLRA) LRR-P Lat: 35.584605 Long:-78.81196 Datum: NAD 83
Soil Map Unit Name: BbA - Bibb sandy loam, 0-2% slopes, frequently flooded NWI Classification: PFO
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes 0 No ❑ (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ significantly disturbed? NO Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes NO ❑
Are Vegetation ❑ , Soil ❑ , or Hydrology ❑ naturally problematic? NO (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map snowing sampling point locations, transects, Important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes 0 No ❑ Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes 0 No ❑ within a wetland? Yes 0 No ❑
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No ❑
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply):
❑
Surface Soil Cracks (66)
❑ Surface Water (Al)
❑
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
0
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
0 High Water Table (A2)
❑
Marl Deposits (615) (LRR U)
0
Drainage Patterns (1310)
0 Saturation (A3)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
❑
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
0 Water Marks (61)
❑
Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (0)
❑
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
❑ Sediment Deposits (132)
❑
Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
❑
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
❑ Drift Deposits (63)
❑
Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
❑
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
❑ Algal Mat or Crust (64)
❑
Thin Much Surface (0)
❑
Geomorphic Position (132)
❑ Iron Deposits (135)
❑
Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Shallow Aquitard (D3)
❑ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
0
FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
0 Water -Stained Leaves (69)
❑
Sphagnum moss (D8) (LRRT, U)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ❑ No
0
Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes 0 No
❑
Depth (inches): 11
Saturation Present? Yes 0 No
❑
Depth (inches): 9
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes 0 No ❑
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2

VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: WA -WET
Absolute
Dominant
Indicator
Dominance Test Worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30-ft )
% Cover
Species?
Status
Number of Dominant Species
1.
Acer rubrum
30
y
FACW
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 12
(A)
2.
Liquidambar styraciflua
30
y
FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3.
Nyssa sylvatica
5
FAC
Species Across All Strata: 13
(B)
4.
Percent of Dominant Species
5.
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 92%
(A/B)
6.
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
65
= Total Cover
OBL species 10 x 1 = 10
Sapling
Stratum (Plot size: 30-ft )
FACW species 55 x 2 = 110
1.
Acer rubrum
10
y
FACW
FAC species 65 x 3 = 195
2.
Liquidambar styraciflua
10
y
FAC
FACU species 5 x 4 = 20
3.
UPL species 0 x 5 = 0
4.
Column Totals: 135 (A) 335
(B)
5.
6.
Prevalence Index = B/A = 2.5
7.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
20
= Total Cover
❑ 1. Rapid test for hydrophytic Vegetation
Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 30-ft )
0 2. Dominance Test is > 50%
1.
Liquidambar styraciflua
5
y
FAC
❑ 3. Prevalence Index is15 3.0'
2.
Nyssa sylvatica
5
y
FAC
❑ 4. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain)
3.
Clethro olnifolia
5
y
FACW
4.
' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
5.
be present, unless disturbed or problematic
6.
7.
Definitions of Vegetation Strata:
15
= Total Cover
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 30-ft )
Tree - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
1.
Arundinaria tecta
10
y
FACW
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and 3 in.
2.
Smilax rotundifolia
5
y
FACU
(7.6 cm) or larger in diameter at breast height (DBH).
3.
Vitis spp.
5
y
FAC
Sapling - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
4.
Woodwardia areolata
5
y
OBL
approximately 20 ft (6 m) or more in height and less
5.
Osmundostrum cinnamomeum
5
y
OBL
than 3 in. (7.6 cm) DBH.
6.
Shrub - Woody plants, excluding woody vines,
7.
approximately 3 to 20 ft (1 to 6 m) in height.
8.
Herb - All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, including
9.
herbaceous vines, regardless of size. Includes woody
10.
plants, except woody vines, less than approximately 3
11.
ft (1 m) in height.
12.
Woody vine - All woody vines, regardless of height.
30
= Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratui (Plot size: 30-ft )
1.
Vitis spp.
5
y
FAC
2.
Hydrophytic
3.
Vegetation Yes 0 No ❑
4.
Present?
=Total Cover
Remarks: (If observed, list morphological adaptations below)
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2

SOIL
Sampling Point: WA -WET
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators).
Depth
Matrix
Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) %
Color (moist) % Type' Loc'
Texture Remarks
0-4
10YR 4/2 95
7.5YR 5/6 5 C PL
SL
4-9
10YR 2/1 85
7.5YR 5/6 10 C M
SL
5 C PL
9-13+
10YR 2/1 90
7.5YR 5/6 5 C M
SL
Type C =
Concentration, D = depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, CS = Covered or Coated Sand Grains
2Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3:
❑
Histosol (Al)
❑
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (LRR S,T,U)
❑ 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR O)
❑
Histic Epipedon (A2)
❑
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (LRR S,T,U)
❑ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR S)
❑
Black Histic (A3)
❑
Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (LRR O)
❑ Reduced Vertic (F18) (outside MLRA 150A,B)
❑
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
❑
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
❑ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (LRR P,S,T)
❑
Stratified Layers (AS)
0
Depleted Matrix (F3)
❑ Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20)
❑
Organic Bodies (A6) (LRR P,T,U)
❑
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
(MLRA 153B)
❑
5 cm Mucky Mineral (A7) (LRR P,T,U)
❑
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
❑ Red Parent Material (TF2)
❑
Muck Presence (A8) (LRR U)
❑
Redox Depressions (F8)
❑ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) (LRR T,U)
❑
1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR P,T)
❑
Marl (F10) (LRR U)
❑ Other (Explain in Remarks)
❑
Depleted Below Dark Surface (All)
❑
Depleted Ochric (Fll) (MLRA 151)
❑
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
❑
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR O,P,T)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
❑
Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (MLRA 15OA:
7
Umbric Surface (F13) (LRR P,T,U)
wetland hydrology must be present,
❑
Sandy Mucky Mineral (Sl) (LRR 0,S)
❑
Delta Ochric (F17) (MLRA 151)
unless disturbed or problematic.
❑
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
❑
Reduced Vertic (F18) (MLRA 150A, 150B)
❑
Sandy Redox (S5)
❑
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 149A)
❑
Stripped Matrix (S6)
❑
Anomalous Bright Loamy Soils (F20) (MLRA 149A, 153C,
153D)
❑
Dark Surface (S7) (LRR P,S,T,U)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type:
Depth (inches)
Hydric Soil Present? Yes F No
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region - Version 2

Appendix 2 - PRELIMINARY JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION (PJD) FORM
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. REPORT COMPLETION DATE FOR PJD:
B. NAME AND ADDRESS OF PERSON REQUESTING PJD: Lee Balance, Prime 1 Builders, 2209 Hamrick Dr, Raleigh NC 27616
C. DISTRICT OFFICE, FILE NAME, AND NUMBER:
D. PROJECT LOCATION(S) AND BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
(USE THE TABLE BELOW TO DOCUMENT MULTIPLE AQUATIC RESOURCES AND/OR
AQUATIC RESOURCES AT DIFFERENT SITES)
State: NC County/parish/borough: Wake City: Fuauay
Center coordinates of site (lat/long in degree decimal format):
Lat.: 35.584561 Long.:-78.812719
Universal Transverse Mercator:
Name of nearest waterbody: Kenneth Creek
E. REVIEW PERFORMED FOR SITE EVALUATION (CHECK ALL THAT APPLY):
❑ Office (Desk) Determination. Date:
❑ Field Determination. Date(s):
TABLE OF AQUATIC RESOURCES IN REVIEW AREA WHICH "MAY BE" SUBJECT TO REGULATORY
JURISDICTION.
Site
number
Latitude
(decimal
degrees)
Longitude
(decimal
degrees)
Estimated amount
of aquatic resource
in review area
(acreage and linear
feet, if applicable)
Type of aquatic
resource (i.e., wetland
vs. non -wetland
waters)
Geographic authority
to which the aquatic
resource "may be"
subject (i.e., Section
404 or Section 10/404)
WA
35.584605
-78.81196
^-0.7 ac
wetland
404
S 1
35.584315
-78.811823
-330 If
non -wetland water
404
S2
35.584592
-78.811491
-90 If
non -wetland water
404
S3
35.584613
-78.811310
-501f
non -wetland water
404

1) The Corps of Engineers believes that there may be jurisdictional aquatic resources in
the review area, and the requestor of this PJD is hereby advised of his or her option
to request and obtain an approved JD (AJD) for that review area based on an
informed decision after having discussed the various types of JDs and their
characteristics and circumstances when they may be appropriate.
2) In any circumstance where a permit applicant obtains an individual permit, or a
Nationwide General Permit (NWP) or other general permit verification requiring "pre -
construction notification" (PCN), or requests verification for a non -reporting NWP or
other general permit, and the permit applicant has not requested an AJD for the
activity, the permit applicant is hereby made aware that: (1) the permit applicant has
elected to seek a permit authorization based on a PJD, which does not make an
official determination of jurisdictional aquatic resources; (2) the applicant has the
option to request an AJD before accepting the terms and conditions of the permit
authorization, and that basing a permit authorization on an AJD could possibly result
in less compensatory mitigation being required or different special conditions; (3) the
applicant has the right to request an individual permit rather than accepting the terms
and conditions of the NWP or other general permit authorization; (4) the applicant can
accept a permit authorization and thereby agree to comply with all the terms and
conditions of that permit, including whatever mitigation requirements the Corps has
determined to be necessary; (5) undertaking any activity in reliance upon the subject
permit authorization without requesting an AJD constitutes the applicant's acceptance
of the use of the PJD; (6) accepting a permit authorization (e.g., signing a proffered
individual permit) or undertaking any activity in reliance on any form of Corps permit
authorization based on a PJD constitutes agreement that all aquatic resources in the
review area affected in any way by that activity will be treated as jurisdictional, and
waives any challenge to such jurisdiction in any administrative or judicial compliance
or enforcement action, or in any administrative appeal or in any Federal court; and (7)
whether the applicant elects to use either an AJD or a PJD, the JD will be processed
as soon as practicable. Further, an AJD, a proffered individual permit (and all terms
and conditions contained therein), or individual permit denial can be administratively
appealed pursuant to 33 C.F.R. Part 331. If, during an administrative appeal, it
becomes appropriate to make an official determination whether geographic
jurisdiction exists over aquatic resources in the review area, or to provide an official
delineation of jurisdictional aquatic resources in the review area, the Corps will
provide an AJD to accomplish that result, as soon as is practicable. This PJD finds
that there "may be" waters of the U.S. and/or that there "may be" navigable waters of
the U.S. on the subject review area, and identifies all aquatic features in the review
area that could be affected by the proposed activity, based on the following
information:

SUPPORTING DATA. Data reviewed for PJD (check all that apply)
Checked items should be included in subject file. Appropriately reference sources
below where indicated for all checked items:
❑■ Maps, plans, plots or plat submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor:
Map:
❑■ Data sheets prepared/submitted by or on behalf of the PJD requestor.
❑ Office concurs with data sheets/delineation report.
❑ Office does not concur with data sheets/delineation report. Rationale:
❑ Data sheets prepared by the Corps:
❑ Corps navigable waters' study:
❑ U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Atlas:
❑ USGS NHD data.
❑ USGS 8 and 12 digit HUC maps.
❑■ U.S. Geological Survey map(s). Cite scale & quad name:
Fuquay-Varina Quad 1:24000
❑m Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey. Citation: Wake Co, NC 1:15840
❑ National wetlands inventory map(s). Cite name:
❑ State/local wetland inventory map(s):
❑■ FEMA/FIRM maps:
❑ 100-year Floodplain Elevation is:
❑ Photographs: ❑ Aerial (Name & Date):
or ❑ Other (Name & Date):
(National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929)
❑ Previous determination(s). File no. and date of response letter:
❑ Other information (please specify):
IMPORTANT NOTE: The information recorded on this form has not necessarily
been verified by the Corps and should not be relied upon for later jurisdictional
determinations.
Signature and date of
Regulatory staff member
completing PJD
Krissina Newcomb Digitally signed by Knssina Newcomb
Date: 2019.11.30 15:07:29-05'00'
Signature and date of
person requesting PJD
(REQUIRED, unless obtaining
the signature is impracticable)'
' Districts may establish timeframes for requestor to return signed PJD forms. If the requestor does not respond
within the established time frame, the district may presume concurrence and no additional follow up is
necessary prior to finalizing an action.

Li I �\
11 i Il 11 � cO�Fy� .
190
40
s
4Q2
^0-0
400 Scale 1 in = 100 ft
Qa �2 Wetland ��, I�
SITE DATA
ADDRESS
AREA PER DEED
ZONING
PIN NUMBERS
DEED
OWNER/DEVELOPER
PRIME 1 BUILDERS, LLC
_ 2209 HAMRICK DRIVE
RALEIGH, NC 27616
Ph. [phone]
i i o
396
H
I � h I
1 z a
J,37 P49 ,yp
L
6.52 AQRE SIT IS LIT WOODED 394
ti°20b�o���
I / \ — —o4
Summerdale II
aM Wetlands and Streams Map
For Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination
30 Nov 2019
ENGINEER
GREG BAGLEY
805 COKESBUR`
FUQUAY VARINA,
Ph. (919) 609-
A Ski"
/S1
F,CR6 69,
I 4 s41 \388 / / / ski \
Project Area
(Limit of Study for Surface Waters)
��ss66 01V ,`•` A 1 / O 2 �y R�/o 2g63a R<o 94
Stream Form
A
ois
p Z�N n uT
I 1 /
i
/ 11 Project Area
IJ \ ', (Limit of Study for Surface Waters)
\'I
\ '4, '9
131 COLEY FARM ROAD
WA WETLAND DELINIATION
Stream/RPW (ie S1, S2, S3)

I OF P
Ro FCT
�A`NAT7pN
f�WgR
, ZNo 06566" A(
RfgO 9M13' PC
s `�p3
V�-A
d
�T^ 6, O
\gags
131 COLEY
FARM )1OAD
40' 20' 0' 40, 80
SITE DATA
ADDRESS
131 COLEY FARM ROAD
AREA PER DEED
6.52 A..
ZONING
END
PIN NUMDERS
0856578506
D EEO
SM 2004 PG 1782
OPEN SPACE
.98 REWIRED, 2,35 AC PROVIDED
DISILRRED AREA
182 ACRES
WETLAND DISTURBED
0.34 AC
WOODED
ADDRESS
6.52 AC
SEi9AGKS
131 COLEY FARM ROAD
FR ONi
20'
REAR
5
SIDE
e•
SEPARATION
10'
LAND USE
EXISTING - VACANT
PROPOSED - TOWNHOUSES
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE
DRIVEWAYS/PARKING - 11,572 SO FT
DWELLINGS = 48.]50 SO FT
ROADWAY = 28.240 SO FT
SIDEWALK =9605 SQ FT
rc105K = 246 SQ FT
TiYEAL - 98.713 m' 2PS GC
LOT SIZE
1560 SO. FT.
OWNER/DEVELOPER ENGINEER
PRIME 1 BUILDERS, LLC
2209 HAMRICK DRIVE
RALEIGH, INC 27616
Ph. [phone]
e
/o' A
1 o
l�� 06 y�QG
� 1
Q
�CJ2
0
,p. 06 � a
00 y`O
� s
n/'1, FN R op
,1,okC 0-56 RpeN
RFS/pF �7 A A(� 369p
\ MSC G 7j47
\ \ WETLAND DELINIATION
kAR \
QQ pNNC psSs6glrE•RSON Wetlands Redaimed
Rfsip "'e3 pc 1194
of 01,14
\ pRp fCT F
`-000AT oN
\
GREG BAGLEY
805 COKESBURY ROAD
FUQUAY VARINA, N,C. 27526
Ph. [phone]
SO FT OF DISTURBED WETLANDS -9898 SO FT = .23 tlC
LF OF 12' PIPE IN WETLANDS -18 LF
LF OF 35' PIPE IN WETLANDS =44 LF
SITE PLAN USA COE
Scale 1 in = 100 ft
W V
cl� z
Q
co O
� m U
Sheet N um Ee,
01