20191641 Ver 1_Lumley Road Project_Delineation Report_20191127

301 McCullough Drive, Suite 109, Charlotte, NC 28262
p. 704.548.0333
f. 704.548.0334
[e-mail]
20190065
Lumley Road Project
Investigation of Waters of the United States
Hendrick Automotive Group
March 20, 2019

Lumley Road Project
Investigation of Waters of the United States
TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1

2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW .......................................................................................................... 1
2.1 Topographic Features ................................................................................................ 1
2.2 Mapped Soils ............................................................................................................. 1
2.3 Hydrologic Conditions ............................................................................................... 2

3.0 DELINEATION INVESTIGATION RESULTS .......................................................................... 2
3.1 Potential Jurisdictional Features ................................................................................ 2

4.0 WETLAND HABITAT ASSESSMENT ..................................................................................... 3

5.0 REGULATORY JURISDICTION ............................................................................................ 4

6.0 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................................... 4

7.0 REFERENCES ...................................................................................................................... 4

TABLES
TABLE 1: Onsite Mapped Soils ....................................................................................... 2
TABLE 2: Extent of Onsite Surface Water Features ......................................................... 3
TABLE 3: Jurisdictional Classification of Onsite Surface Water Features ....................... 3
TABLE 4: Wetland Habitat Assessment Summary .......................................................... 4

APPENDICES
APPENDIX A: Investigative Methodology
APPENDIX B: Signed and Sealed Delineation Survey Map
APPENDIX C: USACE Wetland and Upland Dataforms
APPENDIX D: NC DWQ’s Stream Identification Forms
APPENDIX E: NC WAM Assessment Forms and Rating Sheets

EXHIBITS
Exhibit 1: Location Map
Exhibit 2: USGS Topographic Map
Exhibit 3: Soils Map
Exhibit 4: Delineation Map

PHOTOGRAPHS

Lumley Road Project 1
Investigation of Waters of the United States

1.0 INTRODUCTION

A routine delineation of Waters of the United States, including wetlands, was conducted by EMH&T
for an approximately 17.29-acre study area located north of Lumley Road and west of U.S. 70 in
the City of Raleigh, Wake County, North Carolina (Exhibit 1). This study was performed at the
request of and for the exclusive use of Hendrick Automotive Group.

The study area currently consists of areas of several parcels with wooded areas and areas
previously developed. The approximate center coordinates for the study area are 35.901023°, -
78.768786°.

The study area is located in the Neuse River Basin (8-Digit HUC: 03020201) and the Turkey Creek
12-Digit HUC subwatershed (12-Digit HUC: 030202010802). The study area is regulated by the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Wilmington District.

A field investigation was conducted for the site on February 18 and 19, 2019 by an EMH&T
environmental scientist. Potential wetlands and streams were identified for confirmation by the
USACE. The location and extent of the identified potentially jurisdictional surface water features
are summarized in the following sections. The boundaries identified by EMH&T are potential, as
only the USACE has the final authority to determine whether a wetland or water is jurisdictional.

2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW

A review was made of available topographic maps, soils maps, and wetland inventory maps. This
information helped determine topography and soil types present in the study area. It also identified
any previously mapped wetlands and whether any portions of the study area were located within
mapped floodways.

2.1 Topographic Features

As shown on Exhibit 2, the study area is between the approximate elevations of 370 and 410 feet
(National Geodetic Vertical Datum) according to the USGS 7.5' Series Southeast Durham, North
Carolina Quadrangle (USGS, 1982). A building is mapped in the central portion of the study area
and a large building is mapped north of Lumley Road. Forested areas are mapped in the eastern
portion of the study area. No streams, drainageways, marsh symbols, or open water ponds are
mapped for the study area.

2.2 Mapped Soils

According to the Web Soil Survey for Wake County, North Carolina (SSURGO-NRCS, 2018) (Exhibit
3), four soils are mapped for the study area. The mapped soil is listed in Table 1 along with its
hydric status.

Lumley Road Project 2
Investigation of Waters of the United States

TABLE 1
Onsite Mapped Soils
Mapped Soil Unit
Map
Unit
Symbol
Hydric Status Hydric
Inclusions (%)
Location of
Hydric
Inclusions
Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0
to 2 percent slopes, frequently
flooded
ChA Non-hydric with
hydric inclusions
Chewacla (80%);
Wehadkee (50%);
Riverview (15%)
Floodplains
Creedmoor-Green Level complex,
2 to 6 percent slopes CrB Non-hydric with
hydric inclusions
Creedmoor (65%);
Green Level (45%) Interfluves
Creedmoor-Green Level complex,
10 to 15 percent slopes CrD Non-hydric with
hydric inclusions
Creedmoor (65%);
Green Level (45%) Interfluves
Urban Land Ur Non-hydric - -

A hydric soil is a soil that is saturated, flooded, or ponded long enough during the growing season to
develop anaerobic conditions that favor the growth and regeneration of hydrophytic vegetation
(USDA-SCS, 1985). Three onsite soil types are non-hydric with hydric inclusions in floodplains and
interfluves landforms.

2.3 Hydrologic Conditions

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) was
reviewed for the study area (FEMA, 2019). As shown in Exhibit 4, the entirety of the study area lies
within Zone X (unshaded), which are areas mapped outside the 500-year floodplain.

The United States Fish and Wildlife Service’s (USFWS) National Wetland Inventory Map (NWI)
was also reviewed for the study area (USFWS, 2019). As shown in Exhibit 5, no NWI features are
mapped for the study area.

3.0 DELINEATION INVESTIGATION RESULTS

EMH&T conducted a field investigation of the study area on February 18 and 19, 2019 to
determine the location, extent, and quality of potential Waters of the United States, including
wetlands. The investigative methodology employed by EMH&T is summarized in Appendix A.

As shown on Exhibit 6, one potentially jurisdictional wetland and two jurisdictional streams were
identified within the study area. A signed and sealed delineation survey map has been prepared
by a registered surveyor and is included in Appendix B. Table 2 lists the extent of the surface water
features identified and Table 3 summarizes the jurisdictional classification of each surface water
feature. The USACE wetland and upland data forms are provided in Appendix C. Photographs of
the surface water features are included in the Photographs section.

3.1 Potential Jurisdictional Features

Two jurisdictional streams, Streams 1 and 2, are located on the subject property. One stream,
Stream 3, begins offsite, directly adjacent to the subject property. Stream 3 was not evaluated but
its location was noted due to its direct adjacency to the subject property. Stream 1 is a perennial

Lumley Road Project 3
Investigation of Waters of the United States

headwater stream that scored a 41 on the North Carolina Division of Water Quality’s (NC DWQ)
Stream Identification Form. Stream 1 was characterized by a strong continuous bed and bank that
was fed through a combination of groundwater discharge and stormwater runoff from the adjacent
development on the study area. The stream contained abundant amounts of sediment and moderate
organic debris within the stream. An existing culvert was observed in a portion of Stream 1. Stream
2 is an ephemeral headwater stream that scored a 14.5 on the NC DWQ’s Stream Identification
Form. Stream 2 was characterized by a strong continuous bed and bank that was also fed through
a combination of groundwater discharge and stormwater runoff from the adjacent development on
the study area. The stream also contained weak amounts of fibrous roots in the streambed. The two
onsite streams converged near the northcentral study area boundary and flowed southeast. These
unnamed tributaries flow to Sycamore Creek, Big Lake in Ulmstead Park, Crabtree Creek, which is
a tributary of the Neuse River. The NC DWQ’s Stream Identification Forms are provided in
Appendix D.

The one potential wetland, Wetland A, was identified within the study area. The wetland was
located in a wooded riparian corridor. Wetland A was observed to be abutting a perennial Stream
1, that flows generally west to east through the study area. Wetland A continues offsite to the west.
Wetland B was observed to be adjacent to an ephemeral Stream 2 but was located offsite, outside
of the subject property. Wetland B also extended further west and into the wooded area outside
of the study area. Under the definition of “waters of the United States” (WOTUS) listed in the pre-
2015 Clean Water Rule (51 FR 41250, 1986) as well as Rapanos Guidance (Clean Water Act
Jurisdiction, 2008), these wetlands would be considered potentially federally jurisdictional, as they
are abutting and adjacent to jurisdictional streams.

TABLE 2
Extent of Onsite Surface Water Features
Feature ID Classification Stream (lf) Culverted
Stream (lf) Wetland (ac) Stream (ac)
Stream 1 Perennial 465 17 -- 0.06
Stream 2 Ephemeral 107 0 -- 0.01
Wetland A Forested -- -- 0.08 --
Total -- 572 17 0.08 0.07

TABLE 3
Jurisdictional Classification of Onsite Surface Water Features
Feature ID TNW RPW
Wetland
Abutting
an RPW
Wetland
Adjacent
to a RPW
Non RPW
Wetland
Adjacent
to a Non-
RPW
Isolated
Wetlands
Stream 1 -- X -- -- -- -- --
Stream 2 -- -- -- -- X -- --
Wetland A -- -- X -- -- -- --

4.0 WETLAND HABITAT ASSESSMENT

As shown in Table 4, Wetland A had an overall wetland rating of High. North Carolina Wetland
Asssessment Method (NC WAM) scores are potential until confirmed by the North Carolina Division
of Water Quality (NC DWQ). NC WAM dataforms are located in Appendix E.

Lumley Road Project 4
Investigation of Waters of the United States

TABLE 4
Wetland Habitat Assessment Summary
Feature ID Type Area (ac) NC WAM
Wetland Rating
Wetland A Forested 0.08 High

5.0 REGULATORY JURISDICTION

Impacts to WOTUS, including jurisdictional streams and wetlands, are regulated by the USACE and
the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) through Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (33
U.S.C. 1344). Prior to federal authorization for impacts to streams or wetlands, certification must
also be obtained from the North Carolina Division of Water Quality (NC DWQ) as defined in
Section 401 of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1341). Accordingly, no filling may occur in the
potentially jurisdictional wetlands described in this document without appropriate permits and
authorization from the USACE and NC DWQ.

6.0 CONCLUSIONS

A routine delineation of Waters of the United States, including streams and wetlands, was
conducted and a report was prepared by EMH&T for an approximately 17.29-acre study area is
located north of Lumley Road and west of U.S. 70 in the City of Raleigh, Wake County, North
Carolina. This study was performed at the request of and for the exclusive use of Hendrick
Automotive Group.

The results of the delineation identified one potentially jurisdictional wetlands (0.08 acre) and two
jurisdictional streams (572 linear feet open channel; 17 linear feet culverted) within the study area
boundaries. The boundaries and jurisdictional status of the wetlands are potential until verified by
the USACE.

7.0 REFERENCES

Flood Emergency Management Agency. 2019. Flood Insurance Rate Map for Wake County, North
Carolina. Map numbers: 3710453500K and 3710453600K. Available from:
http://msc.fema.gov/portal.

United States Army Corps of Engineers. 1986. Clean Water Rule: Definition of “Waters of the
United States”. 51 FR 41250. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC Vol. 51, No. 219,
pp. 41067-41292.

United States Army Corps of Engineers & United States Environmental Protection Agency. 2008.
Clean Water Act Jurisdiction, Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s Decisions in Rapanos v. United States
and Carabell v. United States.

United States Department of Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service. USDA-NRCS.
2015. National Hydric Soils List by State. Available online from the website of the Natural Resources
Conservation Service: http://soils.usda.gov/use/hydric/.

Lumley Road Project 5
Investigation of Waters of the United States

United States Department of Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service. USDA-NRCS.
2017. NRCS Web Soil Survey. Available online: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/.

United States Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. USFWS. 2019. National
Wetland Inventory Map. Available online: https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/Data/Mapper.html.
United States Geological Service. USGS. 1982. Southeast Durham, North Carolina Quadrangle, 7.5
minute Series (Topographic). Maps prepared by the U.S. Geological Survey and revised in
cooperation with State of North Carolina Agencies. For sale from the U.S. Geological Survey, Reston,
Virginia 22092.

APPENDIX A:
Investigative Methodology

INVESTIGATIVE METHODOLOGY

Wetlands

According to the Federal Register (1980; 1982), wetlands are defined as Those areas that are
inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support,
and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life
in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas.
Potential wetlands located on non-agricultural lands are identified using the 1987 Wetland
Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory, 1987) for confirmation by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE).

Under normal site conditions, all three (3) indicators of jurisdictional wetlands including the presence
of hydrophytic macrophytes, hydric soils and certain hydrologic indicators must be identified to
meet the criteria for a jurisdictional wetland (Environmental Laboratory, 1987). As such,
identification of potential wetlands requires characterization of plant community types,
identification of hydric soils, and hydrologic indicators for each community type.

For all potential wetland areas, dominant species in the tree, sapling, shrub, woody vine, and herb
layers are determined, in accordance with the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual: Midwest Region, Version 2.0 (USACE, 2010). Recorded vegetative
data consists of herbs with the greatest percentage of aerial cover within 5’ of the plot center.
Within a 15’ radius of the plot center, saplings and shrubs with the greatest height are recorded.
Within a 30’ radius of the plot center, trees with the largest relative basal area and woody vines
with the greatest number of stems are recorded. Species within each of these layers are listed on
data forms in order of dominance.

Dominance is determined for each stratum individually. Dominant species include those that comprise
50 percent of the total dominance measure for a stratum, plus any additional species comprising
20 percent or more of the total dominance measure of a stratum. Hydrophytic vegetation is
determined to be present when more than 50 percent of the dominants in a sample area are listed
as facultative (FAC), facultative wetland (FACW) or obligate wetland (OBL) plants according to
Lichvar (2016).

Where possible, soil data are collected by digging a test pit to a maximum depth of 20” to
determine the presence of hydric soil. Soil matrix and mottle colors are identified using a Munsell
Soil Color Chart (Macbeth, Revised 1994). Evidence of any hydric soil characteristics and evidence
of the presence of wetland hydrology are also recorded.

The boundaries of areas that meet all three (3) wetland criteria are identified and measured in the
field. Points at which dominant vegetation species changes from wetland to upland, where soils
change from hydric to non-hydric, or where indicators of wetland hydrology are no longer observed
are noted. The characteristics of each community type are recorded on dataforms and sample
points are chosen to represent both an identified potential wetland and its surrounding upland
community. All potential wetlands delineated in the field are marked with flagging and surveyed
by a professional land surveyor. The dominant vegetation, soils, and indicators of wetland

hydrology are described on delineation forms. Wetland communities are classified according to
the classification scheme of Cowardin et al. (1979).

Wetlands are further classified using the North Carolina Wetland Assessment Method (NC WAM)
Version 4.1 (N.C. Wetland Functional Assessment Team, 2010). The NC WAM seeks to determine
whether wetlands should be overall rated as Low, Medium, or High quality based on indicators of
wetland condition relative to a reference wetland as a surrogate for wetland function. In effect,
observed wetland condition is used to infer wetland function. The individual wetland function raterins
are combined to produce an overall wetland rating. The overall wetland rating is an aggregate of
all functional levels considered in the NC WAM.

Streams

The centerline of the streams are mapped for their entire length found on-site as surveyed by a
professional land surveyor. Ordinary High Water Marks (OHWM), which define the outermost
regulatory boundaries of streams and open waters, are flagged, and mapped using the GPs unit.
Streams are classified as ephemeral, intermittent, or perennial based on NC DWQ’s Methodology
for Identification of Intermittent and Perennial Streams and Their Origins, Version 4.11 (2010).

Open Water Habitat

The boundaries of open water systems (ponds, lakes, and basins) are delineated either using recent
aerial photography or by flagging boundaries in the field and locating them using a GPS unit.

REFERENCES

Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, Technical Report
Y-87-1. US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. 100 pp. and
appendices.

Federal Register. 1980. 40 CFR Part 230: Section 404(b)(1) Guidelines for Specification of Disposal
Sites for Dredged or Fill Material. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC Vol. 45, No.
249, pp. 85352-3.

Federal Register. 1982. Title 33: Navigation and Navigable Waters; Chapter II, Regulatory
programs of the Corps of Engineers. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC Vol. 47, No.
138, p31810.

Lichvar, R.W., D.L. Banks, W.N. Kirchner, and N.C. Melvin. 2016. The National Wetland Plant List:
2016 wetland ratings. Phytoneuron 2016-30: 1-17. Published 28 April 2016. ISSN 2153 733X.

Macbeth. Revised 1994. Munsell Soil Color Charts. Macbeth, division of Lollmorgen Instruments Corp.,
P.O. Box 230, Newburgh, New York 12551-0230.

U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland
Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region (Version 2.0), ed. J.F. Berkowitz, J. S.
Wakeley, R. W. Lichvar, and C. V. Noble. ERDC/EL TR-12-9. Vicksburg, MS: U.S. Army Engineer

Research and Development Center. Available online at:
http://www.usace.army.mil/Missions/CivilWorks/RegulatoryProgramandPermits/reg_supp.aspx

APPENDIX B

Signed and Sealed Delineation Survey Map
THIS CERTIFIES THAT THIS COPY OF THIS PLAT ACCURATELY DEPICTS THE BOUNDARY OF THE JURISDICTION OF
SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT AS DETERMINED BY THE UNDERSIGNED ON THIS DATE. UNLESS THERE
IS A CHANGE IN THE LAW OR OUR PUBLISHED REGULATIONS, THIS DETERMINATION OF SECTION 404 JURISDICTION
MAY BE RELIED UPON FOR A PERIOD NOT TO EXCEED FIVE YEARS FROM THIS DATE. THIS UNDERSIGNED
COMPLETED THIS DETERMINATION UTILIZING THE APPROPRIATE REGIONAL SUPPLEMENT TO THE 1987 U.S. ARMY
CORPS OF ENGINEERS WETLAND DELINEATION MANUAL, 33 C.F.R. PART 328 AND OTHER U.S. ARMY CORPS OF
ENGINEERS GUIDANCE.
REGULATORY OFFICIAL: ------------------------------
TITLE: --------------------
DATE: ______________________________
= USACE ACTION ID NO.: ______
------------------------
i
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
WAKE COUNTY
I, MATTHEW D. ROWLES, CERTIFY THAT THIS PROJECT WAS COMPLETED UNDER MY DIRECT AND RESPONSIBLE
CHARGE FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION; THAT THIS GROUND SURVEY WAS PERFORMED
AT THE 95% CONFIDENCE LEVEL TO MEET FEDERAL GEOGRAPHIC DATA COMMITTEE STANDARDS; THAT THIS
SURVEY WAS PERFORMED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR A PLANIMETRIC SURVEY TO THE ACCURACY OF
CLASS "A" STANDARD, AND THAT THE ORIGINAL DATA WAS OBTAINED ON JULY 15, 2014; THAT THE SURVEY WAS
COMPLETED ON FEBRUARY 28, 2019; THAT NO ELEVATION INFORMATION OR VERTICAL RELIEF IS SHOWN
HEREON; AND ALL COORDINATES ARE BASED ON THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM NAD
83 AND REALIZATION OF 2011.
I, MATTHEW D. ROWLES, FURTHER CERTIFY THAT THE GRID TIE AS SHOWN HEREON WAS DETERMINED FROM AN
ACTUAL GNSS SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND THAT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION WAS USED TO
i PERFORM THE SURVEY:
CLASS OF SURVEY: A
POSITIONAL ACCURACY: 0.05 sFT
TYPE OF GNSS SURVEY: NC VRS RTN
DATE OF SURVEY: JULY 15, 2014
DATUM/EPOCH: NAD 83(2011)/2010.00
PUBLISHED FIXED CONTROL: NCGS "WAKE 117"
GEOID MODEL: GEOID12B
PROJECT COMBINED GRID FACTOR: 0.99992298 (PUBLISHED)
UNITS: US SURVEY FEET
1GA�T���r��
w
WITNESS MY ORIGINAL
SIGNATURE, LICENSE NUMBER �%--IP
DAY OF ^,-4%4
A.D., 20 ��•tip�", ASS... Z/off•.
a
_ SEAL _
L-4 061
0:��w
N
SUR
,rrr0►�''
D. OWLES,
PLS L-4961 fl P'C)
a?�Z
owfas®emht.com
"+
z
m
v� Job No: 2019-0065
LUMLEY ROAD
o , Scale: 1" = 100'
WETLAND DELINEATION EXHIBIT
� AUTOMOTII/E GROUP
Date: March 14, 2019
H RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
m
Firm Number: F-1016
LEGEN
•- - - - WETLAND BOUNDARY
- ORDINARY HIGH WATER MARK
- - — STREAM
BOUNDARY LINE (SEE NOTE 2)
STM— —STM — STORM CULVERT
RIGHT—OF—WAY
WETLAND
13
14 f
3 2
N/F BARBARA GLOVER MANGUM
D.B. 5566 P. 50
PIN: 0768-83-2574
5
N/F TERRY B. AND DEBORAH OVERTON
D.B. 15802 P. 2630
PIN: 0768-73-9476
7
171
17
00 11
a 101 106
� 200 10210 0 =i
201 202 2 5
Cu r-
STREAM 2
±107 L.F.
(OPEN CHANNEL)
LOCAL PROJECT BENCHMARK
CAPPED 1/2" REBAR SET
X: 2,068,548.07
Y: 782,944.73
PROJECT BENCHMARK
US SURVEY FEET
NCGS "WAK 117"
(GRID, OBSERVED)
X: 2,064,026.91
NCSPCS NAD 83(2011
Y: 782,005.36
US
(SHED)7g15
45"E 4,61 a. S.)
(GRIDS PU/8
NCSPCS NAD 83(201 1)
(11 GR� N 0g1U. N. D. S )
4517.71' �
GRAPHIC
SCALE
0 50 100 200
1 inch = 100 feet
Parcel Ownership: Hendrick Automotive Group
6000 Monroe Road Suite 100
Charlotte NC, 28212
Surveyed For: Hendrick Automotive Group
Date of Field Survey: February 28, 2019
O N
N'D
Cj
0 0Cj
SITE �QO qL
i �OP9 Fti��
-1 QG
.� >
VICINITY MAP
WETLAND A ` SCALE: 1" - 2,000'
0.08t ACRES
N/F HENDRICK AUTOMOTIVE GROUP �l ❑b
D.B. 13295 PG1453
PIN: 0768-83-7222
ADDRESS: 9500 LUMLEY ROAD
STREAM 1 J
±465 L.F. (OPEN CHANNEL)
±17 L.F. (CULVERTED)
�NfF.T
2 ❑ Oyj
R4��E ' Q s8s ' p(c}V C o�p 11
109 11tg530 $ M 7g2S LU Q '
11a 1 3 116 STORMOAO N/F 9520 LUMLEY RD. LLC
CULVERT D.B. 12936 P. 1195
�t14 11 118 PIN: 0768-83-9060
W119 120 127 28
121 12$
117 %
122 125
123 124 1
STREAM 1 0�
±465 L.F. (OPEN CHANNEL)
f 17 L.F. (CULVERTED)���'
N/F HENDRICK AUTOMOTIVE GROUP
t3.12 AC. (GIS)�
D.B. 13295 P. 453
PIN: 0768-82-5739
ADDRESS: 9540 LUMLEY ROAD
REVISIONS
DATE I DESCRIPTION
Evans, Mechwart, Hambleton & Tilton, Inc.
Engineers " Surveyors " Planners - Scientists
5500 New Albany Road, Columbus, OH 43054
Phone: [phone] Toll Free: 888.775.3648
emhtcom
21

GENERAL NOTE:
1. THE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAT IS TO THE SHOW THE SURVEYED STREAM AND WETLAND AREA LOCATIONS FOR THE CURRENT HENDRICK AUTOMOTIVE GROUP SITES AT 9500, 9530 AND 9540
LUMLEY RD, MORRISVILLE, NC.
2. THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY AND SHOULD NOT BE CONSTRUED AS SUCH. BOUNDARY INFORMATION IS SHOWN HEREON FOR ILLUSTRATIVE PURPOSE ONLY PER NOTED DEEDS OF
RECORD AND AN ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY BY MICHAEL D GOODFRED, PLS OF WITHERS & RAVENEL KENNETH CLOSE SURVEYING, TITLED "ALTA SURVEY FOR EHR
INVESTORS, INC.", DATED JULY 22, 2008.
3. THIS SURVEY WAS PERFORMED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT. THE PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON IS SUBJECTED TO ANY SUCH FACTS OR EASEMENTS WHICH MAY BE
DISCOVERED BY A FULL AND ACCURATE TITLE SEARCH.
4. ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL GROUND DISTANCES IN US SURVEY FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. ALL COORDINATES SHOWN HEREON ARE
LOCALIZED, GROUND COORDINATES UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED AS "GRID".
5. WETLAND AREAS SHOWN HEREON DELINEATED BY EMH&T, INC. ON FEBRUARY 18, 2019.
6. OWNERSHIP INFORMATION LISTED FOR ADJACENT PARCELS TAKEN FROM PUBLIC RECORDS AND WAKE COUNTY GIS.
7. PER FEMA FIRM PANEL 3720076800J EFFECTIVE MAY 2, 2006, THE SUBJECT PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON LIES IN FLOOD ZONE 'X'. ZONE 'X' IS THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE ZONE THAT
CORRESPONDS TO AREAS OUTSIDE THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN, AREAS WITHIN THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN, AND TO AREAS OF 1 % ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODING
WHERE AVERAGE DEPTHS ARE LESS THAN 1 FOOT, AREAS OF 1 % ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODING WHERE THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA IS LESS THAN 1 SQUARE MILE, AND AREAS
PROTECTED FROM THE 1% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD BY LEVEES. NO BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS OR DEPTHS ARE SHOWN WITHIN THIS ZONE.
LO
�ll�l�iCl
AUTOMOT/l/E GROUP
N
41 - -
Point Table
Point #
Northing
Easting
1
783515.2460
2068582.0800
2
783444.3960
2068591.2790
3
783443.2160
2068582.4200
4
783386.1280
2068587.4460
5
783366.3970
2068597.9950
6
783352.1910
2068588.4660
7
783329.4870
2068606.3800
8
783299.0440
2068587.3520
9
783277.8550
2068608.1910
10
783192.5400
2068580.6490
11
783146.1720
2068582.3200
12
783148.4780
2068546.6830
13
783513.9714
2068580,7176
14
783458.8039
2068580.5023
15
783289.5282
2068579.8418
16
783189.6210
2068579.4520
17
783157.4687
2068536.3251
LUMLEY ROAD
WETLAND DELINEATION EXHIBIT
RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA
Point Table
Point #
Northing
Easting
100
783142.9740
2068541.7760
101
783133.2020
2068545.9230
102
783121.1870
2068548.2640
103
783111.5850
2068555.6330
104
783105.0380
2068560.4670
105
783112.7710
2068580.5930
106
783118.6580
2068601.4080
107
783109.4590
2068618.0210
108
783096.1220
2068646.9620
109
783070.1570
2068658.1760
110
783062.5780
2068670.6230
ill
783056.8910
2068697.8270
112
783052.2390
2068701.6120
113
783040.6770
2068693.9830
114
783025.7440
2068712.5250
Point Table
Point #
Northing
Easting
115
783011.9500
2068726.2690
116
783016.3460
2068743.4100
117
783004.4510
2068761.3930
118
783001.5260
2068774,2420
119
782999.4180
2068784.1040
120
782996.0170
2068794.2950
121
782974.9970
2068802.4250
122
782958.6600
2068811.8720
123
782959.9570
2068818.7130
124
782956.7060
2068834.6330
125
782956.1100
2068843.0480
126
782967.4170
2068850.0630
127
782971.0820
2068861.3730
128
782984.0800
2068888.2490
Job No: 2019-0065 Parcel Ownership: Hendrick Automotive Group
6000 Monroe Road Suite 100 MARK
Scale: 1" = 100, Charlotte NC, 28212
Date: March 14, 2019 Surveyed For: Hendrick Automotive Group
Date of Field Survey: February 28, 2019
Firm Number: F-1016
DATE
RtH �
v�+�No
O
SITE �4
L
_
� G
�0)
SCALE, 1" - 2,000'
Point Table
Point #
Northing
Easting
200
783110.5840
2068481.8600
201
783105.0250
2068499.0130
202
783105.8640
2068522.7000
203
783108.7110
2068529.3010
204
783102.2850
2068543.8690
205
783102.8320
2068558.6130
REVISIONS
DESCRIPTION
SCAL 9r
d.49 � 1 0�
��++IrYltlt��1
Evans, Mechwart, Hambleton & Tilton, Inc.
Engineers • Surveyors • Planners - Scientists
5500 New Albany Road, Columbus, OH 43054
Phone: [phone] Toll Free: 888.775.3648
emhtcom
2
Z

APPENDIX C:
USACE Wetland and Upland Dataforms
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Lumley Road City/County: Raleigh/ Wake County Sampling Date: 2/18/2019
Applicant/Owner: Hendrick Automotive Group State: NC Sampling Point: W-A-8
Investigator(s): Eric Nagy, EMH&T Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Valley Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave, linear Slope (%):
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 35.902123 Long:-78.768373 Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes (ChA) NWI classification: NA
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation N Soil N or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes _
Are Vegetation N , Soil N or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
✓ No
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No
Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes ✓ No within a Wetland? Yes • No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes ✓ No
Remarks:
Approximately 0.75 inches of rain fell during the week prior to fieldwork.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required)
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required: check all that apply)
_ Surface Soil Cracks (136)
✓ Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
_ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138)
✓ High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
✓ Drainage Patterns (1310)
✓ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Water Marks (61)
✓ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Sediment Deposits (132)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
_ Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Drift Deposits (63)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
_ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
Algal Mat or Crust (64)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Iron Deposits (135)
✓ Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
✓ Water -Stained Leaves (69)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
Aquatic Fauna (1313)
✓ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches): 0.5"
Water Table Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches): 0.5"
Saturation Present? Yes ✓ No
Depth (inches): surface
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No
(includes caoillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available
Remarks:
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants.
Sampling Point: W-A-8
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' )
% Cover Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1 Liquidambar styraciflua
40
YES FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 4 (A)
2. Quercus macrocarpa
30
YES FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3 Quercus rubrum
30
YES FACU
Species Across All Strata: 5 (B)
4.
"
Percent of Dominant Species
5•
That Are 013L, FACW, or FAC: B0 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
8.
_
_
100
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1 =
Sa lin /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
)
FACW species x 2 =
1
-
FAC species x 3 =
2.
-
FACU species x 4 =
3
UPL species x 5 =
4
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
5.
_ "
Prevalence Index = B/A = 0
6.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
7
✓ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9
- -
3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0'
10.
_
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
0
= Total Cover
_
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
1 Carex spp.
15
YES FACW
—
2 Leersia virginica
50
YES FACW
Aster spp-
5
NO FACW
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
3
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
4 Juncus effusus
5
NO FACW
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
5 Dichanthelium clandestinum
5
NO FAC
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
_
6
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
7.
-
height.
8.
-
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
9.
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
10.
" -
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
11.
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
12.
-
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
80
Total Cover
height.
Wood Vine Stratum (Plot size:
)
1.
2.
-
3.
4.
- -
Hydrophytic
5•
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
6
0
= Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

SOIL
Sampling Point: W-A-g
Profile Description: (describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) _ % Color (moist) % Type' Loc` Texture Remarks
0-10 10 YR 5/1 70 2.5 YR 5/4 30 C M sandy
'Tvpe: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. _ 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol (Al)
_ Dark Surface (S7)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
_ Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
_ Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
Black Histic (A3)
_ Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
(MLRA 147, 148)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
✓ Depleted Matrix (F3)
(MLRA 136, 147)
2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
_ Redox Dark Surface (176)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
_ Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
_ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
Thick Dark Surface (Al 2)
_ Redox Depressions (F8)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
_ Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
MLRA 136)
_ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
_ Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
wetland hydrology must be present,
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer (ff observed):
Type: N/A
Depth (inches): N/A
Hydric
Soil Present? Yes No
Remarks
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Eastern Mountains and Piedmont
Project/Site: Lumley Road City/County: Raleigh/ Wake County Sampling Date: 2/18/2019
Applicant/Owner: Hendrick Automotive Group State: NC Sampling Point: U-A-8
Investigator(s): Eric Nagy, EMH&T Section, Township, Range:
Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): hillslope Local relief (concave, convex, none): Convex
Subregion (LRR or MLRA): LRR P Lat: 35.902123 Long: -78.768373
_ Slope (%):
Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name: Chewacla and Wehadkee soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes (ChA) NWI classification: NA
Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes ✓ No (If no, explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation N , Soil N or Hydrology N significantly disturbed? Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes V No
Are Vegetation N , Soil N or Hydrology N naturally problematic? (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes ✓ No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No ✓ within a Wetland? Yes No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No ✓
Remarks:
Approximately 0.75 inches of rain fell during the week prior to fieldwork.
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators (minimum of one is reouired: check all that.aoply)
Surface Water (Al)
_ True Aquatic Plants (1314)
High Water Table (A2)
_ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl)
_ Saturation (A3)
_ Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3)
_ Water Marks (61)
_ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4)
_ Sediment Deposits (62)
_ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6)
Drift Deposits (133)
_ Thin Muck Surface (C7)
Algal Mat or Crust (B4)
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Iron Deposits (135)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137)
Water -Stained Leaves (69)
Aquatic Fauna (613)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No
✓ Depth (inches):
Surface Soil Cracks (86)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68)
Drainage Patterns (610)
Moss Trim Lines (1316)
Dry -Season Water Table (C2)
Crayfish Burrows (C8)
Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9)
_ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1)
Geomorphic Position (D2)
_ Shallow Aquitard (D3)
Microtopographic Relief (D4)
_ FAC-Neutral Test (D5)
Saturation Present? Yes No ✓ Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes
includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available:
Remarks:
No hydrology observed.
No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont —Version 2.0

VEGETATION (Four Strata) — Use scientific names of plants. Sampling Point: U-A-8
Absolute
Dominant Indicator
Dominance Test worksheet:
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'
% Cover
Species? Status
Number of Dominant Species
1. Pinus taeda
60
YES FAC
That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 2 (A)
2 Quercus macrocarpa
40
YES FAC
Total Number of Dominant
3.
-
Species Across All Strata: 2 (B)
4.
-
Percent f Dominant Species
oOBL,
5•
_
That Are FACW, or FAC: 100 (A/B)
Prevalence Index worksheet:
7.
Total % Cover of: Multiply by:
8
100
= Total Cover
OBL species x 1
Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'
)
FACW species x 2 =
1
FAC species x 3 =
2
FACU species x 4 =
3
-
UPL species x 5 =
4
- -
Column Totals: 0 (A) 0 (B)
5.
- -
Prevalence Index = B/A = 0
6:
Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
✓ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
8.
- -
✓ 2 - Dominance Test is >50%
9•
3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0'
%
-
4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting
0
= Total Cover
_
data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5' )
Problematic Hvdrophytic Vegetation (Explain)
1
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9. —
10. _
11.
12.
0 = Total Cover
Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ]
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6. _
0 = Total Cover
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
be present, unless disturbed or problematic.
Definitions of Four Vegetation Strata:
Tree — Woody plants, excluding vines, 3 in. (7.6 cm) or
more in diameter at breast height (DBH), regardless of
height.
Sapling/Shrub — Woody plants, excluding vines, less
than 3 in. DBH and greater than 3.28 ft (1 m) tall.
Herb — All herbaceous (non -woody) plants, regardless
of size, and woody plants less than 3.28 ft tall.
Woody vine — All woody vines greater than 3.28 ft in
height.
Hydrophytic
Vegetation
Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

U9II
Sampling Point: U-A-8
Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Tyne, Loc` Texture Remarks
0-20 10 YR 8/3 60 2.5 YR 3/2 40 C M sandy loam
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol (Al)
_ Histic Epipedon (A2)
Black Histic (A3)
Hydrogen Sulfide (A4)
_ Stratified Layers (A5)
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (LRR N)
Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11)
Thick Dark Surface (Al2)
Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) (LRR N,
MLRA 147, 148)
Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4)
Sandy Redox (S5)
_ Stripped Matrix (S6)
Restrictive Layer (if observed):
Type: N/A
Depth (inches): N/A
Remarks:
Dark Surface (S7)
Polyvalue Below Surface (S8) (MLRA 147, 148)
Thin Dark Surface (S9) (MLRA 147, 148)
Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2)
_ Depleted Matrix (F3)
Redox Dark Surface (F6)
Depleted Dark Surface (F7)
Redox Depressions (F8)
Iron -Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR N,
MLRA 136)
Umbric Surface (F13) (MLRA 136, 122)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19) (MLRA 148)
Red Parent Material (F21) (MLRA 127, 147)
on: PL=Pore Lininq, M=Matrix.
Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sol
_ 2 cm Muck (A10) (MLRA 147)
Coast Prairie Redox (A16)
(MLRA 147, 148)
Piedmont Floodplain Soils (F19)
(MLRA 136, 147)
Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12)
_ Other (Explain in Remarks)
3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
wetland hydrology must be present,
unless disturbed or problematic.
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No
US Army Corps of Engineers Eastern Mountains and Piedmont — Version 2.0

APPENDIX D:
NC DWQ’s Stream Identification Forms
NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
y�4 Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
NC DWQ Stream Identification Form Version 4.11
Date: Project/Site: Latitude:
Fe.� rk r 18 a l q L �V_vN � Qoaa 3 S. 9 01 a.�6
Evaluator: IFir 1 i �''r County: W Longitude: - 7 8, 76 7 c,76
Total Points:
Stream is at least intermittent � 1 Stream Determination [circle one Other
Stream
a i erleast i if 2! intermittent
Ephemeral Intermittent Perennia e.g. Quad Name:
if
A. Geomorphology Subtotal =- )
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1 a' Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri le- ool se uence
0
1
(D
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
0
1
2
3
5, Active/relict floodplain
0
1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
0
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
0
1
2
8. Headcuts
0
1
2
3
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
o =
Yes = 3
a artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
R 4-fteA in ICirhfnfnl = 1
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
0
1
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
15. Sediment on plants or debris
0
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0
0.5
C1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
r` Pininrry IQuh+n+nI c 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
C3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
2
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0
IL.
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0
Q0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0J
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1.5 Cher = 0
*perennial streams iso be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes: _ _-_
Sketch: J p

NC Division of Water Quality -Methodology for Identification of Intermittent and
Perennial Streams and Their Origins v. 4.11
.NC DWQ Stream Identification r orm v ersion 4.11
0
Date: '�� 8 + T Project/Site: L �� Latitude: 3 5". 9 r
Evaluator: G N +T County: W k Longitude: - 76 . 76 87a
Total Points: Stream Determination (circle one) Other
S>_ Stream is at least intermittent 7 phemera Intermittent Perennial e.g. Quad Name:
if 19 or perennial if ? 30" 1
A. Geomor hold Subtotal =
Absent
Weak
Moderate
Strong
1a Continuity of channel bed and bank
0
1
2
3
2. Sinuosity of channel along thalweg
0
1
2
3
3. In -channel structure: ex. riffle -pool, step -pool,
ri le- aol sequence
0
1
2
3
4. Particle size of stream substrate
1
2
3
5. Active/relict floodplainCO-)1
2
3
6. Depositional bars or benches
C 0J
1
2
3
7. Recent alluvial deposits
C22
1
2
3
8. Headcuts
C-02
1
2
9. Grade control
0
0.5
1
1.5
10. Natural valley
0
0.5
1
1.5
11. Second or greater order channel
rNo=O
Yes = 3
4 artificial ditches are not rated; see discussions in manual
12. Presence of Baseflow
0
1
2
3
13. Iron oxidizing bacteria
D
1
2
3
14. Leaf litter
1.5
1
0.5
0
15. Sediment on plants or debris
Co
0.5
1
1.5
16. Organic debris lines or piles
0.5
1
1.5
17. Soil -based evidence of high water table?
No = 0
Yes = 3
r' Rif%! n rQ"kiMnA - 1
18. Fibrous roots in streambed
3
2
1
0
19. Rooted upland plants in streambed
3
1
0
20. Macrobenthos (note diversity and abundance)
0
1
2
3
21. Aquatic Mollusks
0
1
2
3
22. Fish
0
0.5
1
1.5
23. Crayfish
0.5
1
1.5
24. Amphibians
0.5
1
1.5
25. Algae
0.5
1
1.5
26. Wetland plants in streambed
FACW = 0.75; OBL = 1,
r = 0
`perennial streams may also be identified using other methods. See p. 35 of manual.
Notes:
Sketch: �•fr�:��
Q
Nr `f
41
n

APPENDIX E:
NC WAM Assessment Rating Sheet

NC WAM Wetland Rating Sheet
Accompanies User Manual Version 4.1
Rating Calculator Version 4.1
Wetland Site Name Lumley Road - Wetland A Date
2/18/2019
Wetland Type Headwater Forest Assessor Name/Organization
Eric Nagy, EMH&T
Notes on Field Assessment Form (Y/N)
YES
Presence of regulatory considerations (Y/N)
YES
Wetland is intensively managed (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is located within 50 feet of a natural tributary or other open water (Y/N)
YES
Assessment area is substantially altered by beaver (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area experiences overbank flooding during normal rainfall conditions (Y/N)
NO
Assessment area is on a coastal island (Y/N)
NO
Sub -function Rating Summary
Function Sub -function
Metrics
Rating
Hydrology Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
MEDIUM
Sub -Surface Storage and Retention
Condition
HIGH
Water Quality Pathogen Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NO
Particulate Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NA
Soluble Change
Condition
MEDIUM
Condition/Opportunity
MEDIUM
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NO
Physical Change
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NO
Pollution Change
Condition
NA
Condition/Opportunity NA
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N) NA
Habitat Physical Structure Condition HIGH
Landscape Patch Structure Condition LOW
Vegetation Composition Condition MEDIUM
Function Rating Summary
Function
Metrics/Notes
Rating
Hydrology
Condition
HIGH
Water Quality
Condition
HIGH
Condition/Opportunity
HIGH
Opportunity Presence? (Y/N)
NO
Habitat
Conditon
MEDIUM
Overall Wetland Rating HIGH

EXHIBITS
Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P,
NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri
(Thailand), NGCC, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User
Community
CITY OF RALEIGH, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Lumley Road Project
Location Map
Exhibit 1 ¹
0120.5
Miles
SCALE: 1" = 1 Mile
Path: J:\20190065\GIS\Exhibit 1 - Location Map.mxdProject Area
CITY OF RALEIGH, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Lumley Road Project
USGS Topographic Map
Exhibit 2
SCALE: 1" = 1,000'Path: J:\20190065\GIS\Exhibit 2 - USGS.mxdCopyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed
Source: USGS Southeast Durham Quad Map (Pub. 1982)
¹
0 1,000 2,000500
Feet
Legend
Study Area
CITY OF RALEIGH, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Lumley Road Project
Soil Survey of Wake County
Exhibit 3A ¹
SCALE: 1" = 300'Path: J:\20190065\GIS\Exhibit 3A - Soils.mxdSource: Soils - NRCS, 2018; Aerial - Bing Aerials
Legend
Study Area
Soils
Non-Hydric Soils with Hydric Inclusions
0 300 600150
Feet
MT HERMAN RDLUMLEY RDS
E
S
A
M
E

S
T
MT HERMAN
RD
LUMLEY RD
CITY OF RALEIGH, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Lumley Road Project
Soils Map
Exhibit 3B ¹
SCALE: 1" = 300'Path: J:\20190065\GIS\Exhibit 3B - Soils.mxdSource: Soils - USDA, 1970
Legend
Study Area
0 300 600150
Feet
CITY OF RALEIGH, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Lumley Road Project
Flood Insurance Rate Map
Exhibit 4 ¹
SCALE: 1" = 300'Path: J:\20190065\GIS\Exhibit 4 - FIRM.mxdSource: Cross Sections & Flood Hazard Zones - FEMA;
Aerial - Bing Aerials0 300 600150
Feet
Legend
Flood Hazard Zones
Zone Type
Zone AE: 100 year floodplain with base
flood elevations determined.
Zone X (unshaded):Areas outside the
500 year floodplain
Floodway
Study Area
CITY OF RALEIGH, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Lumley Road Project
National Wetland Inventory Map
Exhibit 5 ¹
SCALE: 1" = 300'Path: J:\20190065\GIS\Exhibit 5 - NWI.mxdSource: NWI Features - FWS, 2019;
Aerial - Bing Aerials
Legend
Study Area
NWI Features
0 300 600150
Feet
CITY OF RALEIGH, WAKE COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
Lumley Road Project
Delineation Map
Exhibit 6 ¹
SCALE: 1" = 300'Path: J:\20190065\GIS\Exhibit 6 - Delineation Map.mxdSource: Aerial - Bing Aerials
Legend
Study Area
Wetlands
Streams
Culvert
0 300 600150
Feet

PHOTOGRAPHS

Lumley Road Project
Photograph 1
View of Stream 1 facing downstream.
(EMH&T 2/18/2019)

Photograph 2
Stream 1 facing upstream.
(EMH&T 2/18/2019)

Lumley Road Project
Photograph 3
Stream 2 facing downstream
(EMH&T 2/18/2019)

Photograph 4
View of Potential Wetland A facing north.
(EMH&T 2/18/2019)

Lumley Road Project
Photograph 5
View of Potential Wetland A facing southwest.
(EMH&T 2/18/2019)

Photograph 6
View of Potential Wetland B (offsite), facing west.
(EMH&T 2/18/2019)

Lumley Road Project
Photograph 7
Stream 3 (offsite) facing east.
(EMH&T 2/18/2019)